Michael Faraday_ Man of Science Walter Jerrold 857 downloads.pdf

The Project Gutenberg eBook of Michael Faraday, Man of
Science
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you
will have to check the laws of the country where you are located
before using this eBook.

Title: Michael Faraday, Man of Science

Author: Walter Jerrold

Release date: September 3, 2014 [eBook #46763]
Most recently updated: October 24, 2024

Language: English

Other information and formats: www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/46763

Credits: E-text prepared by Chris Curnow, Craig Kirkwood, and the
Online Distributed Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net)
from page images generously made available by Internet
Archive (https://archive.org)

*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK MICHAEL
FARADAY, MAN OF SCIENCE ***

The Project Gutenberg eBook, Michael Faraday, by Walter Jerrold

Note: Images of the original pages are available through Internet
Archive. See https://archive.org/details/michaelfaradayma00jerr

MICHAEL FARADAY.

MICHAEL FARADAY:
Man of Science.

BY

WALTER JERROLD.

"Whose work was wrought for love, and not for gain."

"One rule his life was fashioned to fulfil;
That he who tends Truth's shrine and does the hest
Of Science, with a humble, faithful will,
The God of Truth and Knowledge serveth best."

FLEMING H. REVELL COMPANY,
NEW YORK CHICAGO TORONTO
Publishers of Evangelical Literature.

PREFACE.
"Tyndall, I must remain plain Michael Faraday to the last." In these words,
with which he replied to Professor Tyndall's urgent appeal to him to accept
the Presidency of the Royal Society, we have a key-note to the character of
the illustrious yet modest scientist, the good and great man, whose life-story
I have attempted to tell in the following pages.
A life-story such as that of Michael Faraday is both easy and difficult to tell
—it is easy in that he passed a simple and unadventurous life; it is difficult,
partly, perhaps, for the same reason, and partly because the story of his life-
work is a story of the wonderful advance made in natural science during the
first half of the present century. Any detailed account of that scientific work
would be out of place in a biography such as the present, which aims at
showing by the testimony of those who knew him and by an account of his
relations with his fellow-men, how nobly unselfish, how simple, yet how
grand and useful, was the long life of Michael Faraday.
Besides this, we are shown—how many an illustrious name in the bede-roll
of our great men brings it to mind—that with an enthusiastic love for a
particular study, and unflagging perseverance in pursuance of it, the most
adverse circumstance of birth and fortune may be overcome, and he who
has striven take rank among the great and good whose names adorn the
annals of their country. Such lives are useful, not alone for the work which
is done, but for the example which they afford us, that we also—to use
Longfellow's well-known, yet beautifully true lines—

"May make our lives sublime,
And departing, leave behind us
Footprints on the sands of time."

"The true scientist," says Mr. Robert Buchanan in a recent work, "should be
patient like Darwin and reverent like Faraday." The latter, indeed, seems to
me to have been a truly typical scientist. Never have we seen an instance of
a less selfish devotion to a man's chosen work. Born the son of a

journeyman blacksmith, brought up amidst the most unpromising
surroundings, with but the scantiest schooling, we find Michael Faraday
educating himself during his spare time, and gradually acquiring, by
indomitable perseverance, that scientific knowledge for which he thirsted.
We find him seeking employment, even in the humblest capacity, in a place
that must have appeared to his youthful mind as the very home of science.
Once there, we find him advancing with marvellous rapidity not only in the
acquirement of knowledge which had been gained by others, but, yet
prouder position, we find him ever adding to that store of knowledge the
discovery of new facts. The patience of the true scientist was assuredly his.
We find him acknowledged by his great contemporaries not only as an
equal but as a leader among them. We find him with wealth and high social
position within his reach. All this do we find—and not this alone; for we
find him at the same time unspoiled in the slightest degree by his success;
caring not in the least for the wealth that might be his, and declining
honours which most men would have considered as but the fair reward of
work which they had done. We find him also the object of love and
admiration, not of his family and intimate friends alone, but of all persons
with whom he came into contact. We find him exploring all the hidden
workings of nature—making known discovery after discovery in the same
modest and enthusiastic manner; and despite all these inquiries into the
secrets of nature, we find him retaining unshaken that firm faith with which
he had started—that beautiful and unquestioning trust in

"A far off divine event
To which the whole creation moves."

Much of Faraday's kindliness and good nature, his considerateness and his
simple earnest faith could be revealed only by his letters and by the records
of those who had known him personally—on this account I have found it
necessary somewhat freely to make use of illustrative quotations. After
studying his life, however, the kindliness, nay more, the true brotherhood of
the man with all men is the feeling which most firmly clings to us; we do
not alone remember the great electrician, experimentalist, and lecturer, but
we have an ever-present idea of the sterling goodness of the man.

"A purer, less selfish, more stainless existence, has rarely been witnessed.
At last came the voice which the dying alone can hear, and the hand which
the living may not see, beckoned him away; and then that noble intellect,
awakening from its lethargy, like some sleeper roused from a heavy dream,
rose up and passed through the gates of light into the better land, where,
doubtless, it is now immersed in the study of grander mysteries than it ever
attempted to explore on earth."
In closing this preface I have much pleasure in recording my deep
indebtedness to Miss Jane Barnard, a niece of the great Professor, and for
some two and twenty years a member of his household, for several
reminiscences of her uncle; and also for her kindness in allowing me to look
through the many interesting manuscripts of Faraday's which are in her
possession.
WALTER JERROLD.

LIBRARY, ROYAL INSTITUTION

CONTENTS.
PAGE
CHAPTER I.
As Child—Newsboy and Bookbinder 11
CHAPTER II.
The Turning Point 27
CHAPTER III.
"Home Thoughts from Abroad" 36
CHAPTER IV.
Back at Work 53
CHAPTER V.
"Science which I Loved" 71
CHAPTER VI.
As Teacher and Preacher 89
CHAPTER VII.
Overwork—The End 107
CHAPTER VIII.
As Friend and Lecturer 127
CHAPTER IX.
Notes on his Work 140
CHAPTER X.
About the Royal Institution 150

MICHAEL FARADAY.

CHAPTER I.
As Child—Newsboy and Bookbinder.

"A virtuous household, though exceeding poor!
Pure livers were they all, austere and grave,
And fearing God; the very children taught
Stern self-respect, a reverence for God's word,
And an habitual piety."
Wordsworth.

Among those of our great men who, born in humble circumstances and
unfurnished with the benefits of early education, have yet secured for
themselves honourable positions in the history of the world's progress,
Michael Faraday holds a remarkable place. Born the son of a journeyman
blacksmith, Michael yet gained for himself a conspicuous position among
the very first scientists of his day, and at the time of his death was
acknowledged as one of the leading philosophers—electricians—chemists
—of this nineteenth century.
Our interest in a great man makes us always interested also in his family—
we become anxious to know who and what he was apart from that which
has made him great. Who were his parents? from where did they come?
what were they like? what did they do? and a number of similar questions
are at once started as soon as we commence considering the lives of our
"great and good." In the case of Faraday we have only scanty information as
to his family, but thus much we have gleaned:—
During the whole of last century there was living in or near the village of
Clapham, in Yorkshire, a family of the name of Faraday. Between the years
1708 and 1730 the Clapham parish register shows us that "Richard ffaraday,
stonemason, tiler, and separatist," recorded the births of ten children, and it
is probable that he had in his large family yet another son, Robert. Whether,
however, Robert was his son or only his nephew is a matter of doubt, but it
is known of him that he married Elizabeth Dean, the possessor of a small

though comfortable house called Clapham Wood Hall, and that he was the
father of ten children, one of whom, James, was born in 1761, and became
the father of Michael Faraday.
Robert and Elizabeth Faraday's six sons were each of them brought up to
some trade or craft, and were thus all of them fitted to go out into the world
and fight the battle of life. One son became a grocer and (as his grandfather,
"Richard ffaraday," had been) tiler; one a farmer; one a shoemaker, and so
on. The third son, James, to us the most interesting member of this large
family, although he appears to have been of somewhat weak constitution
and unfitted for so laborious a vocation, became a blacksmith, served his
apprenticeship, and exercised his craft for some time in the neighbourhood
of his birthplace. When he was five-and-twenty years old (in 1786), James
married; his wife being Margaret Hastwell, the daughter of a farmer living
near Kirkby Stephen, a place some few miles away from Clapham, over the
Westmoreland border. For two years or thereabouts did the young
blacksmith and his wife remain in the neighbourhood of Clapham; but after
that time had elapsed they determined to come up to London, and seek their
fortunes in the great metropolis. To the young men and women of our rural
places the very name of London has about it, even to-day, a ring as of
genuine coin, that tempts them to leave in large numbers the homes of their
childhood that they may plunge into the vortex of city life. A hundred years
ago this strange attractive power of the metropolis was probably much
greater, owing to the difficulty of reaching it and the vague stories that were
told of its wealth. They who had "been to London" were looked upon in
rural places as veritable travellers, and were to their "home-keeping" friends
objects of greater curiosity than anyone who to-day returns from the farthest
or wildest portion of the earth's surface. The old story of "the London
streets being paved with gold"—the story that had buoyed up the spirits of
the youthful Whittington—seems yet in the last century to have gained
some credence. Whether they were induced to do so by promises of work,
or merely attracted to London as a centre where work would probably be
plentiful, we cannot say; but it is at any rate certain that the Faradays
removed from the Yorkshire village to a London suburb some time before
the autumn of 1791. For it was on the 22nd of September in that year that
there was born to them at Newington Butts their third child, Michael, the
future illustrious chemist and philosopher, upon the story of whose life we
are now about to enter.

Of Michael's early years we have but a very meagre account. When he was
about five years old his family removed from Newington Butts, and went to
live in Jacob's Well Mews, Charles Street, Manchester Square, where they
occupied rooms over a coach-house. James Faraday found employment at
this time in Welbeck Street, while his young son passed his time, as children
so circumstanced generally do, in playing in the streets; in after years,
indeed, that son, become a prominent man, would point out where in
Spanish Place he used to play at marbles, and where in Manchester Square
he had at a later time been proud of having to take care of his younger
sister, Margaret. It was from Jacob's Well Mews, too, that Michael went to
school, and received such scant education as was to be his before it became
necessary that he, as a youth of thirteen, should step into the ranks of the
workers and begin the battle of life in earnest; such education as he received
was of the "most ordinary description (to use his own words), consisting of
little more than the rudiments of reading, writing, and arithmetic at a
common day-school. My hours out of school were passed at home and in
the streets."
When Faraday was a boy nine years of age, in the first year of the present
century, there was a time of much distress, when the rate of wages was very
low, and the price of food very high: corn, indeed, which is at the present
time about forty shillings per quarter, cost then as much as £9 for the same
quantity. The distress, was felt very generally throughout the country, and
the Faraday family severely felt the hard times; Michael, we are told, was
allowed one loaf each week, and, it is added (poor Michael!), that the loaf
had to last him that time.

THE HOUSE IN JACOB'S WELL MEWS.
Near by where the Faraday family lived in Jacob's Well Mews there was, at
No. 2, Blandford Street, a worthy bookseller named Riebau. In 1804, when
Faraday was a boy of thirteen, he was employed as an errand boy by Mr.
Riebau, "for one year on trial"—a trial that, as we shall shortly see, proved
highly satisfactory. Michael's duty as errand boy, when he commenced, was
to carry round the newspapers which were lent out by his master. He would
get up very early each Sunday morning, and take the papers round, so that

he might be able to call again for them while it was yet fairly early;
frequently he would be told that he "must call again," as the paper was not
done with. On such occasions he would beg to be allowed to have it at once,
as the next place at which he had to call might be a mile off, and he would
lose so much time going twice over his rounds that he would not be able to
get home and make himself neat, so that he might go with his parents to
their place of worship. Mr. Riebau's shop, it may be noted, has changed but
little since the early part of this century, it is still a stationer's business, and
on the front of the house is placed a plaque bearing the simple inscription
"Michael Faraday, Man of Science," with the date of his apprenticeship
there. This plaque has furnished the simple yet sufficient title for this
volume.
His father, it may here be noted, had joined the Sandemanian Church, or the
followers of Robert Sandeman, who, with his father-in-law, the Reverend
John Glas, had seceded from the Scotch Presbyterian Church, and with him
had started the sect which was named after Sandeman, or, as they are still
called in Scotland, Glasites. In joining the Sandemanian Church, James
Faraday was following the family tradition, for the large family of Clapham
Faradays, to whom we have referred, were all members of the same body.
Michael's mother, although she had not formally become a member of the
Church, used regularly to attend as one of the congregation. Michael, as we
shall learn, joined the Church later on, and continued a devout and sincere
member of it up to the time of his death.
For about a year did young Faraday continue as Mr. Riebau's errand boy;
for about a year, as Professor Tyndall puts it, "he slid along the London
pavements, a bright-eyed errand boy, with a load of brown curls upon his
head and a packet of newspapers under his arm." We learn from one of his
nieces that in his later years he rarely saw a newsboy without making some
kind remark about him; as he said on one such occasion, "I always feel a
tenderness for those boys, because I once carried newspapers myself." He
was reproached, he says, as a boy, with being a great questioner. "He that
questioneth much," says Lord Bacon, "shall learn much;" but this truth is
too often forgotten by their elders when children are "inquisitive," and, as in
Faraday's case, what is but the natural questioning of an awakening mind is
put down to idle curiosity, and the child is told (as we may often hear) "not
to ask so many questions."

Although Faraday says he was thus "charged with being a great questioner,"
he could not recall what kind of questions he put; though he tells one story
against himself which shows that all questioning, even that of a young
philosopher, is not necessarily wise. He had called at a certain house to
leave a newspaper, and whilst waiting for the door to be opened he put his
head between the iron bars that separated the house from the next, and
while in that position asked himself, somewhat strangely, which side of the
railing he was on? No sooner had he started the question than the door
behind him opened, he drew suddenly back, and, hitting himself so as to
make his nose bleed, he forgot all about his question, which, without being
answered, was yet it would seem somewhat definitely settled.
When his year as errand boy expired, Michael was apprenticed to Mr.
Riebau to learn the trade of bookbinder and stationer. His indentures are
dated October 7th, 1805, and contain in one line an excellent testimonial to
his character: "In consideration of his faithful service no premium is given."
Of the earlier part of his seven years' apprenticeship we know but little. His
father wrote in 1809 to a brother at the old home at Clapham, "Michael is
bookbinder and stationer, and is very active at learning his business. He has
been most part of four years of his time out of seven. He has a very good
master and mistress, and likes his place well. He had a hard time for some
while at first going; but, as the old saying goes, he has rather got the head
above water, as there are two boys under him."

"MICHAEL FARADAY, MAN OF SCIENCE, APPRENTICE
HERE."
In that he was placed within reach of many and good books, which should
go a great way towards deciding his scientific and speculative bent of mind,
a position such as that in Mr. Riebau's shop was as good a one as he could
have had. Not only were many scientific books, that had hitherto been
unavailable, now placed ready to his hand, but he had in Riebau a kind and
considerate master; he was allowed, and it was a valuable privilege, to be
out occasionally of an evening that he might attend the lectures on natural
philosophy which a Mr. Tatum was delivering at that time at his house in
Dorset Street, Fleet Street. Michael saw bills announcing the lectures in
shop windows, and became anxious to hear them, which he was enabled to
do owing to the kindness of his master, Mr. Riebau, and the generosity of
his elder brother Robert, who at the time was following their father's
business, and made Michael a present on several occasions of the shilling
which was charged for entrance to the lectures.
Towards the end of the year 1809 Faraday's family removed from Jacob's
Well Mews, where their home had been for thirteen years, and went to live
at 18, Weymouth Street, near Portland Place, and there, on October 30th of
the following year, James Faraday died. He had been out of health for some

years, and seems indeed to have been quite physically unfitted for so
laborious an occupation as that of blacksmith. In 1807 he had written to a
brother at Clapham, "I am sorry to say I have not had the pleasure of
enjoying one day's health for a long time. Although I am very seldom off
work for a whole day together, yet I am under the necessity (through pain)
of being from work part of almost every day." He then concludes his letter
in that spirit of simple yet earnest devotion that appears to have been
characteristic of the whole family: "But we, perhaps, ought to leave these
matters to the overruling hand of Him who has a sovereign right to do what
seemeth good to Him, both in the armies of heaven and amongst the
inhabitants of the earth."
Michael's strong affection for his parents became, as he grew older, one of
the most marked features of his character; his great love for his mother is
shown in many ways, notably in every letter which he wrote to her. The
following story illustrates, as do many others that are told of him, Faraday's
depth of feeling with regard to his family. After he had become recognised
by the world as the great man that he was, and when sitting to Noble for his
bust, it happened that the sculptor, in giving the finishing touches to the
marble, made a clattering with his chisels: noticing that his sitter appeared
moved, he said he feared the jingling of the tools had distressed him, and
that he was weary. "No, my dear Mr. Noble," said Faraday, putting his hand
upon his shoulder, "but the noise reminded me of my father's anvil, and
took me back to my boyhood."
Gradually Faraday's interest widened in those matters which later on were
to entirely engross his attention. His apprenticeship at first gave him many
opportunities of reading philosophical and scientific works. "I loved," he
afterwards wrote, referring to this time, "to read the scientific books which
were under my hands, and, amongst them, delighted in Marcet's
Conversations in Chemistry, and the electrical treatise in the Encyclopædia
Britannica. I made," he adds, and the item is interesting as giving us a first
glimpse at his experiments, "I made such simple experiments in chemistry
as could be defrayed in their expense by a few pence per week, and also
constructed an electrical machine, first with a glass phial, and afterwards
with a real cylinder, as well as other electrical apparatus of a corresponding
kind." Watts' On the Mind, was, he said, the first thing that made him really
think; while his thoughts were directed towards science by an article on

electricity, which he lighted upon in an encyclopædia entrusted to him to
bind. Such glimpses into the early reading—showing us how the bent of his
genius is decided—are always interesting in the life of one who, as
Tennyson says, "Has made by force his merit known."
Into Faraday's early reading—or that part of his reading which bore upon
the science with which his name is so intimately connected—we have
indeed something more than a glimpse, for he compiled (during 1809-10) a
note book in which he wrote down the names of such books and articles
connected with the sciences as interested him. This note book he called,
"The Philosophical Miscellany: being a collection of notices, occurrences,
events, etc., relating to the arts and sciences, collected from the public
papers, reviews, magazines, and other miscellaneous works; intended to
promote both amusement and instruction, and also to corroborate or
invalidate those theories which are continually starting into the world of
science."
Thus ambitiously did Michael Faraday, a youth of not yet twenty years,
start upon his career as an investigator; thus early did he evince a desire to
"corroborate or invalidate those theories which are continually starting into
the world of science." Among books and articles to which reference is made
in the interesting Miscellany, there are papers by Dr. Darwin,[1] papers on a
"Description of a Pyro-pneumatic Apparatus," and "Experiment on the
Ocular Spectra of Light and Colours," frequent references to "lightning,"
"electric fish," and other electrical phenomena, showing his early leaning
towards this particular branch of investigation. There is a reference to the
short essay on the Formation of Snow, which forms the reading for
December 5th, in that interesting, and at the present time neglected, work,
Sturm's Reflections on the Works of God. This book has perhaps been
supplanted in a great measure by the many popular treatises on science and
natural history which recent years have produced, but which, nevertheless,
have not taken the place of the Reflections, the simplicity and directness of
which give to the volume a perennial charm such as but few books can
maintain. Other papers, such as that on "How to Loosen Glass Stopples,"
included in the Miscellany, show us Faraday's interest in the science of
everyday life, to which in his later years we owe those delightfully
interesting lectures on "The Chemical History of a Candle," lectures to
which fuller reference is made later on in this volume. One other reference

in the Miscellany is at any rate worthy of passing note for obvious reasons,
or for reasons which are obvious as soon as we learn how closely connected
is the career of Faraday with that of his great benefactor and predecessor in
the field of research, Sir Humphry Davy. The reference is from the
Chemical Observer, to the effect that "Mr. Davy (he was knighted in 1812)
has announced to the Royal Society a great discovery in chemistry—the
fixed alkalies have been decomposed by the galvanic battery."
From the lectures at Mr. Tatum's house our young philosopher gained
something more than a knowledge of the subjects discussed—he gained
several friends, intercourse and exchange of ideas with whom were to form
no inconsiderable part of his education; that he might illustrate the lectures,
too, he set to study perspective, being kindly assisted in his work by Mr.
Masquarier, a French refugee artist who was lodging at the time at Mr.
Riebau's, and whose kindness to him Faraday never in after years forgot to
acknowledge. About a dozen lectures at Mr. Tatum's were spread over
rather more than eighteen months (February, 1810—September, 1811). At
them, Faraday became acquainted with Benjamin Abbott, a confidential
clerk in the City—an acquaintance that ripened into life-long friendship;
here also he met Huxtable, a medical student, to whom he addressed the
earliest note of his which is extant. Other kindred spirits with whom
Faraday entered into friendly relations at the Dorset Street lectures, were
Magrath, Newton, Nichol, and many more. There is a perverted and
ridiculous story told of Faraday's first hearing Davy lecture, to the effect
that "Magrath happening, many years ago, to enter the shop of Mr. Riebau,
observed one of the bucks of the paper bonnet zealously studying a book
which he ought to have been binding. He approached; it was a volume of
the old Britannica, open at 'Electricity.' He entered into talk with the
journeyman, and was astonished to find in him a self-taught chemist, of no
slender pretensions. He presented him with a set of tickets for Davy's
lectures at the Royal Institution; and daily thereafter might the nondescript
be seen perched, pen in hand, and his eyes starting out of his head, just over
the clock opposite the chair. At last the course terminated; but Faraday's
spirit had received a new impulse, which nothing but dire necessity could
have restrained." This circumstantial yet exaggerated story, couched as it is
in the worst of tastes, is yet quoted with approval in a recent work supposed
of some authority.

Magrath, as we have seen, Faraday had met earlier, and, as he tells us
himself, the kindness of giving him tickets for Davy's lectures was done
him by Mr. Dance.[2] The story quoted above says also that he might be
seen daily, and that "at last" the course terminated. To show us how garbled
is this account and in what it is true, we will turn to an account of this
incident—this important incident—in his life, which Faraday himself wrote
out later at the request of a correspondent. "During my apprenticeship," he
says, "I had the good fortune, through the kindness of Mr. Dance, who was
a customer of my master's shop, and also a member of the Royal Institution,
to hear four of the last lectures of Sir H. Davy in that locality. The dates of
these lectures were February 29th, March 14th, April 8th and 10th, 1812. Of
these I made notes, and then wrote out the lectures in a fuller form,
interspersing them with such drawings as I could make. The desire to be
engaged in scientific occupation, even though of the lowest kind, induced
me, whilst an apprentice, to write, in my ignorance of the world and
simplicity of my mind, to Sir Joseph Banks, then President of the Royal
Society. Naturally enough, 'no answer' was the reply left with the porter."
The four lectures which Faraday heard during the spring of 1812 were, as
we shall see in the next chapter, to mark an epoch in his life. At each of
these lectures, we are told, the delighted youth listened to Sir Humphry
Davy, from a seat in the gallery immediately over the clock directly facing
the illustrious lecturer;[3] both speaker and listener being unaware of the
close inter-connection there was destined to be between their two careers.
But of this in the next chapter, for between Faraday's hearing Davy's
lectures and his correspondence with that great man, there are one or two
other interesting facts in connection with the life of our bookbinder's
apprentice and would-be philosopher. In July of this year it was that
Michael commenced his long and interesting series of letters to Benjamin
Abbott, letters that show us how keenly alive Faraday was to all things
connected with the work with which he was anxious to become more
intimately connected, and at the same time how anxious he was to make up
for his deficiencies of education.
In all his letters we find a charm in the simple earnestness of the man, in his
straightforward search for truth, in the unreserved openness which
characterised him when corresponding with one whom he not only called a
friend, but treated as such on all occasions. Simplicity, in its best and

highest meaning, was, if we can in one word sum up the character of a man,
the chief feature of Faraday in all his relations throughout life. Through all
his letters to his intimate friends, too, there runs a vein of unaffected
pleasantry which shows us at once that he was no "mere scientist," no "dry-
as-dust" philosopher, which is a character too often given by thoughtless
and careless persons to men who earn their laurels in any special field of
research. We find that the great chemist or philosopher is not only a great
scientist, but that he is also, as Faraday undoubtedly was, a man of a simple,
earnest, reverent nature, a man whose married life was one series of years
of love-making, who was a cheerful, pleasant friend and companion, and
intense and earnest lover of children.
Perhaps I cannot better conclude this chapter than by giving a few passages
from his early letters, passages that will fully bear out much of what is said
in the preceding paragraph. It was in July, 1812, three months before the
articles of his apprenticeship ran out, that Faraday began his letters to
Abbott; he was not as yet twenty-one years of age, his early education, as
we have seen, had been chiefly the three R's, yet we find these letters
eminently remarkable for their correctness and fluency, not less than for
their kindness, courtesy, and candour. His first letter to Abbott is, indeed,
doubly interesting, for it gives us the earliest account we have of any of his
experiments. After writing a good deal on what he considers to be the
advantage of a correspondence, he continues: "I have lately made a few
simple galvanic experiments, merely to illustrate to myself the first
principles of the science.... I, sir, I my own self, cut out seven discs of the
size of halfpennies each! I, sir, covered them with seven halfpence, and I
interposed between seven, or rather six, pieces of paper soaked in a solution
of muriate of soda!!! But laugh no longer, dear A.; rather wonder at the
effects this trivial power produced. It was sufficient to produce the
decomposition of sulphate of magnesia—an effect which extremely
surprised me; for I did not, could not, have any idea that the agent was
competent to the purpose."
Again, to the same friend, he writes: "What? affirm you have little to say,
and yet a philosopher? What a contradiction! What a paradox! 'tis a
circumstance I till now had no idea of, nor shall I at any time allow you to
advance it as a plea for not writing. A philosopher cannot fail to abound in
subjects, and a philosopher can scarcely fail to have a plentiful flow of

words, ideas, opinions, etc., etc., when engaged on them; at least, I never
had reason to suppose you deficient there. Query by Abbott: 'Then pray,
Mike, why have you not answered my last before now since subjects are so
plentiful?' 'Tis neither more nor less, dear A., than a want of time. Time, sir,
is all I require, and for time will I cry out most heartily. Oh that I could
purchase at a cheap rate some of our modern gents' spare hours, nay, days; I
think it would be a good bargain both for them and me. As for subjects,
there is no want of them. I could converse with you, I will not say for ever,
but for any finite length of time. Philosophy would furnish us with matter;
and even now, though I have said nothing, yet the best part of a page is
covered."
A little later he writes, acknowledging a letter from his friend, a letter which
found him paper-hanging—"but what a change of thought it occasioned;
what a concussion, confusion, conglomeration; what a revolution of ideas it
produced—oh! 'twas too much; away went cloths, shears, paper, paste, and
brush, all—all was too little, all was too light to keep my thoughts from
soaring high, connected close with thine."
This letter, after referring to his friend's electrical experiments, he finishes
somewhat sadly, "You know I shall shortly enter on the life of a
journeyman, and then I suppose time will be more scarce than it is even
now." Little did he dream how great a change in his prospects one short half
year would make.

CHAPTER II.
The Turning Point.

"And Nature, the old nurse, took
The child upon her knee,
Saying: 'Here is a story-book
Thy Father has written for thee.'

'Come, wander with me,' she said,
'Into regions yet untrod;
And read what is still unread
In the manuscripts of God!'"
Longfellow.

There is a story told of Sir Humphry Davy, that, on being asked on a certain
occasion to enumerate what he considered as his greatest discoveries, he
named first one thing and then another,—now his wonderful safety-lamp,
then some electrical discovery, finishing up with "but the greatest of all my
discoveries was the discovery of Michael Faraday."
In the autumn of 1812, as we have seen, Faraday was a bookbinder, whose
apprenticeship was just at an end, and who was contemplating, as the only
thing possible, the taking up of life as a journeyman at the craft at which for
seven years he had been working; indeed, a journeyman bookbinder he
became, for in October of that year he engaged himself to a Mr. De la
Roche, who, though a quick-tempered, passionate man, seems to have
really cared for Faraday, so much so, indeed, that he said to him, "I have no
child, and if you will stay with me you shall have all I have when I am
gone." But Michael was not thus to be tempted from the path which he
desired to tread, as he wrote afterwards to Davy's biographer, "My desire to
escape from trade, which I thought vicious and selfish, and to enter into the
service of science, which I imagined made its pursuers amiable and liberal,
induced me at last to take the bold and simple step of writing to Sir H.

Davy, expressing my wishes and a hope that if an opportunity came in his
way he would favour my views; at the same time, I sent the notes I had
taken of his lectures."
Shortly after Sir Humphry received Faraday's application, speaking to a
friend—the honorary inspector of the models and apparatus—he said,
"Pepys, what am I to do? Here is a letter from a young man named Faraday;
he has been attending my lectures, and wants me to give him employment
at the Royal Institution. What can I do?"
"Do?" was Pepys' reply, "do? put him to wash bottles; if he is good for
anything, he will do it directly; if he refuses, he is good for nothing."
"No, no," said Davy, "we must try him with something better than that."
Notwithstanding the fact that his similar application of some months before
to Sir Joseph Banks had met with no answer, Faraday, in his desire to leave
trade for science, had thus addressed another of the leading men of the day.
Davy's reply was "immediate, kind, and favourable." It was this—

"December 12th, 1812.
"To Mr. Faraday,
"Sir,—I am far from displeased with the proof you have given me of
your confidence, and which displays great zeal, power of memory, and
attention. I am obliged to go out of town, and shall not be settled in
town till the end of January; I will then see you at any time you wish.
It would gratify me to be of any service to you; I wish it may be in my
power.
"I am, Sir, your obedient humble servant,
"H. Davy."

SIR HUMPHRY DAVY.
The young bookbinder's delight on receiving the great and kindly-natured
man's note may easily be imagined, as also may his anxiety for Davy's
return. Five weeks, however, are soon passed, and Michael duly met Sir
Humphry "by the window which is nearest to the corridor, in the ante-room
to the theatre" at the Royal Institution. Davy was much impressed by the
sincerity and modesty of the applicant, but yet advised him to continue at
his bookbinding, going so far, indeed, as to say that he would get the Royal
Institution binding for him, and would recommend him to his friends.[4]
With this, for the present, Faraday had to be content. He returned to his

binding, delighted that he had met and conversed with the greatest chemist
of his time, but still anxious for an opportunity to leave that trade to which,
as he had said, he was so averse, and to become wholly the servant of that
science to which he was so attached.
The change in his vocation was to come far more rapidly than he could
have anticipated. He was still living, at this time (early in 1813), at 18,
Weymouth Street, and one night, not very long after his interview with
Davy, just as he was undressing to go to bed, there came a loud knock at the
front door. Michael went to the window to see if there was any evidence as
to whom the unwonted visitor might be. A carriage was there, from which a
footman had alighted and left a note for "Mr. M. Faraday." It proved to be
from Sir Humphry, who had already an opportunity of serving the young
enthusiast. The note requested Michael to call on Davy the next morning.
This he did, and learned that an assistant in the laboratory of the Royal
Institution was required at once, the former assistant having been dismissed
the day before. Michael instantly expressed his willingness to accept the
position; he was to have twenty-five shillings a week salary, and two rooms
at the top of the Institution building.
It was not long before arrangements were all completed. A meeting of the
managers of the Institution was held on March 1st; the following is entered
in the minutes of that day's proceedings:—"Sir Humphry Davy has the
honour to inform the managers that he has found a person who is desirous
to occupy the situation in the Institution lately filled by William Payne. His
name is Michael Faraday. He is a youth of twenty-two years of age. As far
as Sir H. Davy has been able to observe or ascertain, he appears well fitted
for the situation. His habits seem good, his disposition active and cheerful,
and his manner intelligent. He is willing to engage himself on the same
terms as those given to Mr. Payne at the time of quitting the Institution.
Resolved:—That Michael Faraday be engaged to fill the situation lately
occupied by Mr. Payne on the same terms."
The duties of the assistant were specified by the managers in the following
manner, his work being something other than the washing of bottles, which
Pepys had recommended. It is a fact, also, that Faraday, almost from the
commencement of his engagement, was concerned in more important work
than that herein particularised. He was "to attend and assist the lecturers and
professors in preparing for, and during, lectures; when any instruments or

apparatus may be required, to attend to their careful removal from the
model room or laboratory to the lecture-room, and to clean and replace
them after being used, reporting to the manager such accidents as shall
require repair, a constant diary being kept by him for that purpose. That, in
one day in each week, he be employed in keeping clean the models in the
repository, and that all the instruments in the glass cases be cleaned and
dusted at least once within a month." As has been said, Faraday's work was
almost from the first of a higher nature; he is reported to have set in order
the mineralogical collection soon after his arrival.
But a very short while elapsed between Michael's appointment as assistant
and his taking up the duties of his post, for, on the 8th of March, he writes
to Abbott, dating his letter from his new home, the two rooms at the top of
the Institution. His letter tells us that he was already concerned in the active
duties of his post, as the following passages show: "It is now about nine
o'clock, and the thought strikes me that the tongues are going both at
Tatum's and at the lecture in Bedford Street; but I fancy myself much better
employed than I should have been at the lecture at either of those places.
Indeed, I have heard one lecture already to-day, and had a finger in it (I
can't say a hand, for I did very little). It was by Mr. Powell on mechanics, or
rather, on rotatory motion, and was a pretty good lecture, but not very fully
attended.
"As I know you will feel a pleasure in hearing in what I have been or shall
be occupied, I will inform you that I have been employed to-day, in part, in
extracting the sugar from a portion of beetroot, and also in making a
compound of sulphur and carbon—a combination which has lately occupied
in a considerable degree the attention of chemists."
About a month after writing the letter of which the above forms a part,
Faraday again wrote to his friend Abbott, giving him an account of some
experiments, in which he had been assisting Sir Humphry Davy, on "the
detonating compound of chlorine and azote, and of four different and strong
explosions of the substance, explosions from which neither he nor Davy
had altogether escaped unhurt." "Of these," he says, "the most terrible was
when I was holding between my thumb and finger a small tube containing
7-1/2 grains of the compound. My face was within twelve inches of the
tube; but I fortunately had on a glass mask. It exploded by the slight heat of
a small piece of cement that touched the glass above half-an-inch from the

substance, and on the outside. The explosion was so rapid as to blow my
hand open, bear off a part of one nail, and has made my fingers so sore that
I cannot yet use them easily. The pieces of the tube were projected with
such force as to cut the glass face of the mask I had on." In the other three
experiments also they each of them got more or less cut about by the
explosion of the "terrible compound," as Faraday calls it, Davy, indeed, in
the last one, getting somewhat seriously cut.
He writes thus frequently to Abbott during the summer of 1813, giving him
in the later letters some well thought-out ideas on lectures and lecturing,
which we shall have occasion to glance at when we are considering Faraday
himself in the capacity of a lecturer,—one of the most popular and yet truly
scientific lecturers of any time. In this year, his twenty-first, Faraday joined
the City Philosophical Society, which had been founded about five years
earlier by Mr. Tatum, at whose house the meetings were held. The Society
consisted of some thirty or forty individuals, "perhaps all in the humble or
moderate rank of life;" and certainly all of them anxious to improve
themselves and add to their knowledge of scientific subjects. Once a week
the members gathered together for mutual instruction; each member
opening the discussion in his turn by reading a paper of a literary or
philosophical nature, any member failing to do so at his proper time being
fined half-a-guinea. In addition, the members had what they modestly
called a "class book," but probably very like what we should now call a
manuscript magazine; in this each member wrote essays, and the work was
passed round from one to another.
Michael, it will be seen, was not neglecting any opportunity of educating
himself; as he had said in starting his correspondence with Abbott, one of
his objects was to improve himself in composition and to acquire a clear
and simple method of expressing that which he had to say. Yet another
method had he of furthering his self-education. In the scanty notes which he
wrote about his own life he says, "During this spring (1813) Magrath and I
established the mutual improvement plan, and met at my rooms up in the
attics of the Royal Institution, or at Wood Street at his warehouse. It
consisted, perhaps, of half-a-dozen persons, chiefly from the City
Philosophical Society, who met of an evening to read together, and to
criticise, correct, and improve each other's pronunciation and construction
of language. The discipline was very sturdy, the remarks very plain and

open, and the results most valuable. This continued for several years." It is a
matter for wonder how Faraday, with all these attempts to improve his
language and method, and to avoid even the slightest peculiarity, managed
yet to retain in all his work a remarkable simplicity and naturalness of style.
On September 13, 1813, Faraday wrote to his uncle and aunt, giving them
an account of himself because he had nothing else to say, and was asked by
his mother to write the account:—"I was formerly a bookseller and binder,
but am how turned philosopher, which happened thus: Whilst an apprentice,
I, for amusement, learnt a little of chemistry and other parts of philosophy,
and felt an eager desire to proceed in that way further. After being a
journeyman for six months, under a disagreeable master, I gave up my
business, and, by the interest of Sir Humphry Davy, filled the situation of
chemical-assistant to the Royal Institution of Great Britain, in which office I
now remain, and where I am constantly engaged in observing the works of
nature and tracing the manner in which she directs the arrangement and
order of the world. I have lately had proposals made to me by Sir Humphry
Davy to accompany him, in his travels through Europe and into Asia, as
philosophical assistant. If I go at all, I expect it will be in October next,
about the end, and my absence from home will perhaps be as long as three
years. But, as yet, all is uncertain, I have to repeat that, even though I may
go, my path will not pass near any of my relations, or permit me to see
those whom I so much long to see."
This Continental trip with Davy forms one of the chief episodes in
Faraday's life. He had, though two-and-twenty years of age, never before
been further than a few miles out of London. The country through which he
passed, the sea, and the mountains, all came to him as a revelation. The
letters which he wrote home from abroad, and the journals which he kept,
all express his wonder at the strange sights, and all breathe the kindliness of
nature and affection for home and those at home which all his life long were
strongly marked characteristics. His letters to his mother are especially
pleasing. He was away for but little over eighteen months, yet an account of
his travels merits a chapter to itself. The commencement of 1813 marked an
epoch in his life, the close of the same year marked another.

CHAPTER III.
"Home Thoughts from Abroad."

"One rule his life was fashioned to fulfil:
That he who tends Truth's shrine, and does the hest
Of Science, with a humble, faithful will,
The God of Truth and Knowledge serveth best."

"Wednesday, October 13th, 1813.—This morning formed an epoch in my
life."
Thus commences the first entry in that journal, in which, all the while that
he was away, Faraday noted down particulars of what he saw and thought.
And, indeed, the young traveller's remark is by no means an exaggeration,
as we recognise when we consider that he had never been out of sight of the
metropolis, that he was accompanying one of the leading chemists, and that
he and Davy, Englishmen both, were allowed free passports through France,
although this and that country were at the time at war with one another. The
fact that Davy was a scientist overshadowed the fact that he was an
Englishman in the eyes of the French authorities; as the former, he was
permitted to travel anywhere, and to use libraries, museums, etc., at any
time; as the latter, he would have been instantly taken prisoner. This was an
early and pleasing recognition of the universality of science, of its more
than political or national interest, nay, of its international importance.
So minute are the descriptions of things seen, so clear and simple is the
language employed, that Faraday's journal is most delightful reading; while
the letters written home and to his friends are no less pleasing; perhaps,
indeed, they are more so as they are so eminently characteristic of the man.
They are remarkable for the unaffected spirit of affection which breathes
through them, and show us, as indeed was shown in all ways throughout his
life, the keen sensitiveness of his feelings and the genuine earnestness with
which he was at all times seeking for self-improvement.

On reaching Plymouth, Faraday gives expression in his diary to the wonder
which moved him at seeing the country for the first time. The journey, of
course, had to be done by road, as it was long before the time of railways;
but coach or carriage riding, during fine autumn weather, through some of
the most delightful scenery of rural England, must at any time be preferable
to, though less expeditious than, railway travelling; and that Michael felt the
full benefit of it is shown by the following passage from the journal:—
"Friday, October 15th.—Reached Plymouth this afternoon. I was more
taken by the scenery to-day than by anything else I have ever seen. It came
upon me unexpectedly, and caused a kind of revolution in my ideas
respecting the nature of the earth's surface. That such a revolution was
necessary is, I confess, not much to my credit; and yet I can assign to
myself a very satisfactory reason, in the habit of ideas induced by an
acquaintance with no other green surface than that within three miles of
London. Devonshire, however, presented scenery very different to this; the
mountainous nature of the country continually put forward new forms and
objects, and the landscape changed before the eye more rapidly than the
organ could observe it. This day gave me some idea of the pleasures of
travelling, and has raised my expectations of future enjoyment to a very
high point."
If the surface of the earth gave our amateur traveller cause for wonder, what
must have been his feelings when he first went down to the sea-shore? or
when, on the night of October 17th, he was on board in mid-channel, with
the "immense waves," as he graphically puts it, "striding one after another
at a considerable distance?" or when, again, to use his own words, the
vessel "sank down into the valleys between the great waves, and we had
nothing in view but the wall of waters around us." He carefully observed,
on this occasion, remaining on deck all night for that purpose, the
phosphorescence of the sea. The next day they reached the harbour of
Morlaix, on the French coast, where, after much examination of luggage,
and searching in all possible and impossible places for contraband goods by
the French Customs' officers, they took up their lodging for a couple of
nights. And on the 22nd, the carriage having been successfully put together
(to ensure comfortable accommodation Sir Humphry had brought his own
with him), the party commenced their tour, reaching Paris, where a stay of
three months' length was made, on the 29th. Faraday's observant nature is

made evident to us in every page of his journal, and the light, humorous
style in which much of it—that part which admits of such treatment—is
written, gives evidence of the abiding cheerfulness of his disposition.
On the road to Paris there was a temporary stoppage, owing to the breaking
of one of the horses' traces. While the accident was being repaired by the
postillion, Faraday found, to his great delight, a glow-worm, the first that he
had seen, and which gave him much food for reflection. So great an
impression did the first sight of the luminous little grub make on him, that,
writing to his mother six months afterwards, and enumerating some of the
more important things he had seen in his travels, he says, "I have seen a
GLOW-WORM!"
In Paris Davy stayed some three months, and Faraday records the great
disadvantage under which he laboured through not knowing the French
language. Despite this, however, he attended lectures with Davy, and
accompanied him on visits to the laboratories of the various French
chemists of the day, among others to that of Chevreul, who was even then
(he was three years older than Faraday) well known as one of the rising
chemists of the day.[5] It was well for Davy, and his assistant too, perhaps,
that the Paris authorities did not read the entries which the young
Englishman "with a round chin, a brown beard, a large mouth, and a great
nose,"[6] made in his journal, for he records as follows a visit which he paid
to the Galerie Napoléon:—"It is," he wrote, "both the glory and the disgrace
of France. As being itself, and as containing specimens of those things
which proclaim the power of man, and which point out the high degree of
refinement to which he has risen, it is unsurpassed, unequalled, and must
call forth the highest and most unqualified admiration; but when memory
brings to mind the manner in which the works came here, and views them
only as the gains of violence and rapine, she blushes for the people that
even now glory in an act that made them a nation of thieves."[7]
Although he thus discoursed in his journal about what he saw and thought,
he did not by any means neglect his favourite science, and his journal
during the stay in Paris contains frequent reference to the experiments
which Sir Humphry was carrying on with a new substance which had been
discovered a short while before by a French chemist—M. Courtois. This
substance, now known as iodine, was the source of much interesting

research. Not only about the time of its discovery, but during the whole of
the century it has afforded scope to chemists for much speculation and
useful experiment.
The race-prejudice, which early in the present century affected English
opinion of all things French, is to be traced even in Faraday, who, with all
his fairness and open-mindedness, seems always congratulating himself on
not belonging to the people among whom he finds himself. This insular
spirit finds expression in such passages as the following, which he wrote
after staying indoors all day with nothing better to do than to note the
difference between the rooms in Paris and those he was accustomed to in
England. He sums his views up thus:—"French apartments are magnificent,
English apartments are comfortable; French apartments are highly
ornamented, English apartments are clean; French apartments are to be
seen, English apartments enjoyed; and the style of each kind best suits the
people of the respective countries."
From Paris the small party—which
consisted of Sir Humphry and Lady
Davy and Faraday, whose nominal
position was that of "assistant in
chemistry and experiments"—went
south to Montpelier, near the coast
of the Mediterranean and some
seventy-five miles from Marseilles.
After about six weeks' stay they
again started on their travels; and
after a cold and adventurous TORPEDO FISH.
journey across the Alps, reached
Turin on February 22nd, at the
close of the Carnival. From Turin they went to Genoa—where Faraday was
much interested in several water-spouts which he saw in the bay—and then
on to Florence. Various experiments were made by Davy at each place, on
iodine, on the electricity of the torpedo fish, etc.; while at each place
Faraday found some opportunity of helping to satisfy his craving for
improvement. Of the stay at Florence the journal gives but little account
other than of Davy's experiment to find out of what a diamond is composed,
and of the various attempts which were made with the assistance of the

"Duke's burning glass" to burn diamond. After noting these experiments,
Faraday concludes: "As yet it appears that the diamond is pure carbon."
From Rome, which was the next halting-place on their travels, Michael
wrote home to his mother a long letter, every line of which breathes a spirit
of true affection. "I trust that you are well in health and spirits, and that all
things have gone right since I left you.... Mr. Riebau and fifty other friends
would be inquired after, could I but have an answer. You must consider this
letter as a kind of general one, addressed to that knot of friends who are
twined round my heart; and I trust that you will let them all know that,
though distant, I do not forget them, and that it is not from want of regard
that I do not write to each singly, but from want of convenience and
propriety; indeed, it appears to me that there is more danger of my being
forgot than of my forgetting. The first and last thing in my mind is England,
home, and friends. It is the point to which my thoughts still ultimately tend,
and the goal to which, looking over intermediate things, my eyes are still
directed. But, on the contrary, in London you are all together, your circle
being little or nothing diminished by my absence; the small void which was
formed on my departure would soon be worn out, and, pleased and happy
with one another, you will seldom think of me. Such are sometimes my
thoughts, but such do not rest with me; an innate feeling tells me that I shall
not be forgot, and that I still possess the hearts and love of my mother, my
brother, my sisters, and my friends.... Whenever a vacant hour occurs I
employ it by thinking on those at home. In short, when sick, when cold,
when tired, the thoughts of those at home are a warm and refreshing balm to
my heart. Let those who think such thoughts useless, vain, and paltry, think
so still; I envy them not their more refined and more estranged feelings: let
them look about the world, unencumbered by such ties and heartstrings, and
let them laugh at those who, guided more by nature, cherish such feelings.
For me, I still will cherish them, in opposition to the dictates of modern
refinement, as the first and greatest sweetness in the life of man."
It is in his letters such as this that we get to understand Faraday, and to
appreciate how it was that his friends, members of his family, nay, even
persons who casually met him, were always struck by the simplicity and
lovableness of the man. Altogether, Michael got much pleasure, and a great
deal of experience, both of life and of science, during his Continental tour,
although it was not a source of unmixed delight. His engagement was to

accompany Davy in the capacity of secretarial and scientific assistant, but
some work certainly not included under that head fell to him owing to Sir
Humphry's valet not accompanying the party at the last moment. Had he
been with Davy alone this would have been of little matter, for Davy was a
kind and considerate man, and would have dispensed with a servant's
attendance, and have recognised in Faraday the scientific assistant only; but
—unfortunately for Michael—Lady Davy, as has been mentioned,
accompanied her husband, and she was not so considerate; and, in
consequence, Faraday was treated at times almost as a servant. This,
occasionally, was very trying to him; but Michael was too much of a
philosopher to give in because circumstances were not as he could wish,
and he wrote to his friend Abbott, that though he had to sacrifice much, "the
glorious opportunity he enjoyed of improving in the knowledge of
chemistry and the sciences continually determined him to finish the voyage
with Sir Humphry Davy." A decision of this nature is characteristic of
Faraday at all times: he rarely started any work without having carefully
considered it; but, having started it, he was not one to take his hand from
the plough before the furrow was completed.
This quality is well illustrated in a story which is told of Faraday when he
had become a well-known chemist. He was arranging some apparatus with
a scientific instrument maker, when a small piece of glass fell to the ground;
Faraday made several unsuccessful efforts to pick it up, when his
companion said that it was not worth troubling over. "Perhaps not," said
Faraday; "but I do not like to fail in accomplishing anything that I have
attempted."
The months of May and June were spent by the small party mostly in Italy
—first in Rome, then Naples, and afterwards travelling from place to place.
At Naples a stay of some days was made, and Faraday's journal gives us an
interesting account of two visits to Mount Vesuvius. On the second day the
party, largely increased by other visitors, had a picnic on the Mount. "Cloths
were laid on the smoking lava, and bread, chickens, turkey, cheese, wine
and water, and eggs roasted on the mountain, brought forth, and a species of
dinner taken at this place. Torches were now lighted, and the whole had a
singular appearance; and the surrounding lazzaroni assisted not a little in
adding to the picturesque effect of the scene. After having eaten and drunk,
Old England was toasted, and 'God save the king!' and 'Rule, Britannia'

sung; and two very entertaining Russian songs by a gentleman, a native of
that country, the music of which was peculiar and very touching."

NAPLES AND MOUNT VESUVIUS.
From Naples the journey is continued up north through all the magnificent
scenery of Italy; the journal giving us occasionally delightful word-pictures
of the landscape, and recording the young traveller's observations on
various natural phenomena. Now, as we have seen, glowworms attract his
attention, then waterspouts, and the magnificent spectacle presented by
Vesuvius; and again his attention is occupied with the beautiful fire-flies
that appeared "in innumerable quantities; at a distance they covered the side
of the mountain, and near us they passed over the fields, hovered on the
edge or crossed the road, often attaching themselves to the harness, and
emitting their bright and harmless flashes of light in a rapid and beautiful
manner."
In July our party found themselves settled in Geneva, where some three
months were passed very enjoyably in congenial society. Davy was the
guest of the elder De la Rive, with whom he experimented in chemistry, and
with whom, they both being ardent sportsmen, he went out fishing and
shooting. "On these occasions," says Professor Tyndall, "Faraday charged

Davy's gun, while De la Rive charged his own. Once the Genevese
philosopher found himself by the side of Faraday, and in his frank and
genial way entered into conversation with the young man. It was evident
that a person possessing such a charm of manner and such high intelligence
could be no mere servant. On inquiry De la Rive was somewhat shocked to
find that the soi-disant domestique was really preparateur in the laboratory
of the Royal Institution; and he immediately proposed that Faraday
thenceforth should join the masters instead of the servants at their meals. To
this Davy, probably out of weak deference to his wife, objected; but an
arrangement was come to that Faraday thenceforward should have his food
in his own room."
For reasons such as these we can well understand that Faraday's life during
his Continental journeying was not altogether as pleasant as he had
anticipated it would be. In his letters his reserve on this matter is
marvellous, for it is only twice, and in writing to his intimate friend, Abbott,
that he refers at all to his, at times, uncomfortable situation, and then it is to
give point to what he has been saying in reply to his friend's complaint as to
the sordid and unintellectual surroundings amid which he is compelled to
live. In his journals also Faraday's reticence with regard to those with whom
he travelled is noticeable; he wrote impressions of what he saw, and of what
he thought that was worth record, and this was done merely for his own
future use and pleasure—he would never wish to recall any petty
humiliations which circumstances compelled him to suffer, and they were
very properly allowed to pass unrecorded. Indeed, in the note quoted above,
particulars of which were given Professor Tyndall by M. De la Rive, we
learn more of the discomforts of his post than Faraday himself ever allowed
to escape. It is indeed a great pity for his own good fame that Davy should
have allowed a "weak deference to his wife" to influence him in such a
matter, as it was a great pity when a few years later he allowed a petty spirit
of jealousy to make him oppose the election of Faraday as a Fellow of the
Royal Society.
From Geneva many letters were written home to his mother and friends.
This is characteristic: "Here, dear mother, all goes well. I am in perfect
health, and almost contented, except with my ignorance, which becomes
more visible to me every day, though I endeavour as much as possible to
remedy it." It is strange how different we find the Faraday of the letters and

the Faraday of the journal. In the first case the cheerful kindliness, the
affectionate, sympathetic side of the man's nature at once strikes us; while
in the journal the clear and simple description, uncoloured by personal
feeling or prejudice, is no less remarkable.
The three months' stay at Geneva at an end, the small party, bidding
farewell to their hospitable and kindly host, De la Rive, turned south again.
In De la Rive, Michael, by his intelligence, his scientific enthusiasm, and
his unassuming cheerful disposition had won a life-long friend. The route
south may well be described briefly in Michael's own words, from a letter
to his mother written early in November at Rome: "On leaving Geneva we
entered Switzerland, and traversed that mountainous and extraordinary
country with health and fine weather, and were much diverted with the
curious dresses and customs of the country.... From Switzerland we passed
through the States of Baden, on the Lake of Constance (they are very
small), across an arm of the kingdom of Wurtemburg, and into Bavaria. In
this route we had seen, though slightly, Lausanne, Vevey, Zurich,
Schaffhausen and the falls of the Rhine, in Switzerland, and Munich, and
many other towns in Germany. On leaving Munich we proceeded to and
across the Tyrol, and got to Padua, and from Padua to Venice. You will
remember very well, I have no doubt, the picture which hung in the parlour
over the fireplace, and which represented the Rialto and the Great Canal of
this town. The first I have had the pleasure of crossing several times, and
the second I have partly traversed in a Venetian gondola.... After seeing
Venice for three days we left it, and came towards Italy, passing Bologna
and Florence."
Before reaching Florence the two philosophers went out of their way to
inquire into a phenomenon at Pietra Mala which was much talked about.
From certain tracts of ground in the neighbourhood sheets of flame of
various sizes were said to burst out; the fire was said to burn anything
combustible, although the ground where the flames were was not even
heated; locally, it was said to be the remains of an ancient volcano. "Though
it was raining hard, yet that would not deter Sir Humphry from visiting
those places; but, at the same time, it made us wish to be as quick as
possible. Sir Humphry therefore went to the first place, and I went to the
Acqua bollenti, conducted by a man of the village, who carried some fire,
some straw, and some water. I found the place in a cultivated field, not far

from a mountain, apparently of limestone. It was simply a puddle perhaps
formed by the present showers of rain. Much gas rose from the earth, and
passed through the water, which made it appear boiling, and had given rise
to its name; but the water and the ground were quite cold. I made another
puddle with the water we brought, near the one I found there, and I saw that
the gas rose up through it also; and it appeared to be continually passing off
from a surface of more than eighteen inches in diameter. The soil appeared
deep, and close to the spot supported vegetation readily. The man inflamed
some straw, and then laid it on the ground; immediately the gas inflamed,
and the flame spread to some distance from the straw over the surface of the
earth, waving about like the flame of weak spirits of wine; this flame burnt
some moments. On putting a light to the bubbles which rose through the
water they inflamed, and sometimes a flame ran quickly from them over the
whole surface of the water. I filled a bottle with the gas, but I could not
distinguish any smell in it. In pouring water into the bottle, and lighting the
jet of gas that came out, a large clear flame was obtained. The whole of this
flame was a very pale blue, like spirits of wine. It inflamed paper and
matches readily, as might be expected; and when I held a dry bottle or knife
over it, they appeared to become dim by condensing water: but this was
uncertain, as the weather was so rainy. The water had no taste, and appeared
pure rain water. I brought some of it and the gas away, and returned to the
village." In the "almost deserted laboratory of the Florence Academy"
experiments with the Pietra Mala gas convinced Davy that it was "light
hydrocarburet, pure."
The second stay in Rome extended over nearly four months, during which
time the grand Carnival took place. Faraday had at this part of his tour a
great deal of his time to himself, and earnestly devoted himself to
continuing the study of the French and Italian languages, on which indeed
he had been working all the while he had been away from home. But he
also continued his observations on men and manners, for during the
Carnival week he twice attended masked balls in a domino, besides being
present at the horse-races on the Corso, and at other of the events of the
Carnival. He was, however, anxious to be on his way home to England, and
his letters occasionally show how sad he felt at not knowing how soon the
return would be.

It was, however, to be earlier than he anticipated. On January 25th, 1815, he
wrote to Abbott: "Now for news! We shall part in a few weeks (pray write
quickly) for Naples, and from thence proceed immediately to Sicily.
Afterwards our road is doubtful; but this much I know, that application is
made for passports to travel in the Turkish Empire, and to reside in
Constantinople; that it is Sir Humphry's intention to be among the Greek
islands in March, and at Athens early in the spring.... Adieu, dear friend.
With you I have no ceremony. The warmest wishes that friendship can
dictate are formed for you by M. Faraday." Thus had he written towards the
end of January—within three months he was to be shaking hands with his
friend at home!
While on the road to Naples, Faraday heard of the escape of Napoleon from
Elba on March 7th, and records it thus briefly in his journal: "Tuesday,
March 7th.—I heard for news that Bonaparte was again at liberty. Being no
politician, I did not trouble myself about it, though I suppose it will have a
strong influence on the affairs of Europe." It is strange how quietly Davy
and his "assistant" passed through Europe at a time when war was
convulsing nearly the whole of it; quietly and apparently unconcernedly
they went their way, seeing who and what was to be seen at the various
stopping-places, prosecuting their researches in different branches of
chemistry, and adding in many ways to their stores of knowledge,
seemingly unaffected by
"The time that tried men's souls."
At Naples Faraday again ascended Vesuvius, and on this occasion had the
grand experience of seeing it in active eruption. He writes a full and graphic
account in the journal, from which one passage, descriptive of the eruption
itself, may well be quoted. This time Faraday had ascended with a guide
only, Sir Humphry having stayed part way up the mountain to see Monte
Somma. "I saw a large shower of red-hot stones in the air," writes Faraday,
"and felt the strong workings of the mountain; but my care was now to get
to the crater, and that was soon done. Here the scene surpassed everything.
Before me was the crater, like a deep gulf, appearing bottomless from the
smoke that rose from below. On the right hand this smoke ascended in
enormous wreaths, rolling above us into all forms; on the left hand the
crater was clear, except where the fire burst out from the side with violence,
its product rising and increasing the volume of volatile matter already raised

in the air. The ground was in continual motion, and the explosions were
continual, but at times more powerful shocks and noises occurred; then
might be seen rising high in the air numbers of red-hot stones and pieces of
lava, which at times came so near as to threaten us with a blow. The
appearance of the lava was at once sufficient to satisfy one of its pasty
form. It rose in the air in lumps of various size, from 1/2 lb. to 25 lb. or
more. The form was irregular, but generally long, like splashes of thick
mud; a piece would often split into two or more pieces in the air. They were
red-hot, and, when they fell down, continued glowing for five, ten, or
fifteen minutes.... I was there during one explosion of very great force,
when the ground shook as with a strong earthquake, and the shower of lava
and of stones ascended to a very great height, and at this moment the smoke
increased much in quantity. The guide now said this place was not safe,
from its exposed situation to the melted lava and to the smoke, and because
it oftentimes happens that a portion of the edge of the crater is shaken down
into the gulf below. We therefore retreated a little, and then sat down,
listened, and looked."
We have seen from the letter to Abbott at the end of January that a
somewhat lengthened tour had been planned out. On March the 21st
Faraday's journal says, "We left Naples at five o'clock." From that time the
return was rapid. At Rome there was some delay owing to the lack of post-
horses; the French troops under Murat were advancing, and everybody was
leaving the city; the Pope had fled, and the cardinals were flying. After a
delay of a couple of days carriage-horses were hired at a great expense, and
the travellers proceeded on their homeward flight. At Mantua delay again
occurred, as the passports had to be "signed, re-signed, and countersigned."
"At last," says Faraday, "we saw the outside of the town, having, much
against our will, remained two hours and a-half in it."
Faraday's last letter home is written from Brussels on April 16th; it is to his
mother, and is well worth reading: "My very dear Mother,—It is with no
small pleasure I write you my last letter from a foreign country, and I hope
it will be with as much pleasure you will hear I am within three days of
England. Nay more, before you read this letter I hope to tread on British
ground.... I am not acquainted with the reason of our sudden return; it is,
however, sufficient for me that it has taken place. We left Naples very
hastily, perhaps because of the motions of the Neapolitan troops, and

perhaps for private reasons. We came rapidly to Rome, we as rapidly left it.
We ran up Italy, we crossed the Tyrol, we stepped over Germany, we
entered Holland, and we are now at Brussels, and talk of leaving it to-
morrow for Ostend; at Ostend we embark, and at Deal we land on a spot of
earth which I will never leave again. You may be sure we shall not creep
from Deal to London, and I am sure I shall not creep to 18, Weymouth
Street; and then—but it is of no use. I have a thousand times endeavoured to
fancy a meeting with you and my relations and friends, and I am sure I have
as often failed: the reality must be a pleasure not to be imagined or
described.... You may be sure that my first moment will be in your
company. If you have opportunities, tell some of my dearest friends, but do
not tell everybody—that is, do not trouble yourself to do it.... My thoughts
wander from one to another, my pen runs on by fits and starts; I do not
know what to say, and yet cannot put an end to my letter. I would fain be
talking to you, but must cease. Adieu till I see you, dearest mother; and
believe me ever your affectionate and dutiful son,
"M. Faraday."
"'Tis the shortest and (to me) the sweetest letter I ever wrote you."
Thus ended Faraday's wanderings—

"But who may tell
What forms he brought away,
To stand reveal'd at mem'ry's spell,
And glad some distant day!"

He returned home better equipped for continuing the work of chemical
research, for which he had so intense a liking, with his stores of knowledge
vastly increased, and his energy and application not one whit abated. How
he again took up the thread of his work must be told in another chapter.

CHAPTER IV.
Back at Work.

"A choice that from the passions of the world
Withdrew, and fixed me in a still retreat;
Sheltered, but not to social duties lost,
Secluded, but not buried; and with song
Cheering my days, and with industrious thought;
With the ever-welcome company of books;
With virtuous friendship's soul-sustaining aid,
And with the blessings of domestic love."
Wordsworth.

His friends and relations having had due attentions from him, Faraday at
once began to cast about for work. On going abroad with Davy he had
relinquished his position at the Royal Institution, though Sir Humphry had
promised to befriend him on their return; this promise was, much to
Faraday's gratification, duly fulfilled. Within a fortnight of his return
Michael found himself re-engaged at the Institution in the capacity of
"assistant in the laboratory and mineralogical collection, and superintendent
of the apparatus," a high-sounding office that carried with it the none too
substantial honorarium of thirty shillings a week, and, as before, rooms in
the building. It was, however, a distinct rise, both in position and in wage,
and Faraday, we may be sure, was pleased to get back to his well-loved
Institution on such terms.
A life spent in scientific research is, generally, an apparently uneventful
one. Faraday's life, far from being an exception to this rule, was rather an
accentuation of it. The story of his life is indeed highly interesting; but its
interest lies in it, not as a story of action and change, but as a life that may
be said to have realised almost wholly the ideal which was set before it.
From the very first moment when Faraday gave expression to his hate for
trade and his love for science, his whole life was a practical illustration of

his feelings; as we shall find on following him through his great and
honourable career, there were many occasions on which he refused not only
titles and such like honours, but pecuniary benefits which might fairly be
considered his dues—no, "his work was wrought for love and not for gain,"
as the line which I have placed on the title page of this little book so well
expresses it.
The tour on the Continent, as has been noted, was the most striking episode
in Faraday's long life. From May 7th, 1815 (the date on which he rejoined
the Institution), onwards, his life was a time of steady intellectual growth,
spent in chemical research, in the explaining of phenomena, and in what is
by no means his least claim on our regard, the popularisation of scientific
knowledge. We have seen in his early correspondence with Benjamin
Abbott how, on his very earliest acquaintance with lecturing and lectures at
the Royal Institution, he began to study the different styles of the various
lecturers, to note their peculiarities, and in what lay the secret of their
success; we have seen, too, how he was striving to improve himself in
composition—in the clear and intelligent method of stating things. He was
preparing himself betimes for what he felt to be part of his true vocation;
how eminently successful—beyond his wildest imaginings—he was, will be
seen as we follow his life-story year by year.
It was, as Faraday frequently acknowledged, his
good fortune to assist Sir Humphry Davy in his
experiments not only while abroad, but after
their home-coming. One of the most important
of all Davy's discoveries was made in the year
of their return. On August 3rd he acknowledged
a letter which he had received from Dr. Gray,
directing his attention to the awful destruction of
human life by explosions in coal mines. On
October 31st, Davy announced to his
correspondent that he had discovered a "safety
lamp;" on November 2nd he read a paper on
fire-damp before the Royal Society, and on
December 14th submitted to Dr. Gray models of
lamps and lanterns made on the principle of his
discovery, "that fire-damp will not explode in

tubes or feeders of a certain small diameter." In THE DAVY SAFETY
his experiments, in connection with this LAMP.
discovery, Davy received considerable help
from his laboratory assistant, who must have been much gratified by that
passage in Davy's paper on the "safety lamp," in which the great discoverer
expressed himself as "indebted to Mr. Michael Faraday for much able
assistance." This was "Mr. Michael Faraday's" first public recognition, and
must have been very delightful to him, especially coming as it did from the
man of all others for whom, in his scientific capacity, Michael had the most
profound admiration.
Davy gained, as is well known, much honour and no inconsiderable amount
of money for his discovery. There are, however, circumstances in which the
safety lamp is not safe; Faraday, and, it is to be presumed, Davy himself,
was aware of this. It is illustrative of Faraday's stern regard for truth that,
although he was at the time Davy's own assistant, he did not, and would
not, attest before a parliamentary committee to the universal safety of the
Davy lamp.
Early in 1816 we find Faraday beginning to put into practice those ideas on
lectures and lecturing which he had so carefully considered before. On the
point of giving his first lecture, though, he seems to doubt himself, and in a
letter to Abbott occurs the following passage—"I intend making some
experiments on that subject (lecturing) soon; I will defer it (his letter on
lecturing) till after such experiments are made. In the meantime, as
preparatory and introductory to such a course of experiments, I will ask
your opinion of, and observations on, English composition—style, delivery,
reading, oratory, grammar, pronunciation, perspicuity, and in general all the
branches into which the belles lettres divide themselves; and if by asking I
procure, I shall congratulate myself on the acquisition of much useful
knowledge and experience."
The first lecture—on the "General Properties of Matter"—was duly and
successfully delivered before the City Philosophical Society on January
17th. Before trusting himself to go upon the platform, Faraday carefully
wrote out his lecture, word for word, as it was to be delivered; a plan which
he followed in the case of each of the other six lectures which he gave
before the same Society during the year. These lectures I have had the
pleasure of seeing, as they are neatly written out and bound by their author.

They are, with many similar treasures, in the possession of Miss Jane
Barnard, a niece of Faraday.
This year was an important one in several ways; not only did Faraday give
his first lecture, but also his first printed paper appeared in the Quarterly
Journal of Science, which was edited by Mr. Brande, who succeeded Sir
Humphry as chief of the Royal Institution. The paper was on an analysis of
native caustic lime, which had been undertaken at Davy's instigation. That
his scientific friends and patrons were beginning to recognise something out
of the common in their laboratory assistant is shown in various ways,
notably by such a passage as the following, taken from Faraday's note-
book: "When Mr. Brande left London in August, he gave the Quarterly
Journal in charge to me; it has had very much of my time and care, and
writing, through it, has been more abundant with me. It has, however, also
been the means of giving me earlier information on some new objects of
science."
Faraday's common-place book—a kind of continuation of his Philosophical
Miscellany of six years earlier—gives us a good deal of information as to
his intellectual progress at this time; it shows us not only what scientific
subjects were interesting him, but also how zealously he was continuing his
study of composition and the mode of expressing what he had to say clearly
and definitely. There are passages from the Spectator, alongside of tests
with arsenic, a description of a visit to a silk-ribbon dresser's, along with an
account of Zerah Colburn, the American calculating boy. Sir Humphry
Davy wrote to Faraday, saying, "Mr. Colburn, the father of the American
boy who has such extraordinary powers of calculation, will explain to you
the method his son uses in confidence. I wish to ascertain if it can be
practically used."
It has been remarked of Faraday that his was a poet-nature expressing itself
through science; and this estimate seems largely true, but the verses which
he wrote in his common-place book, "On Love," if they be his own
composition, are extremely poor; there are other verses though which will
merit quotation. They are written by Mr. Dryden, a fellow-member of the
City Philosophical Society, and are entitled "Quarterly Night," October 2nd,
1816, being descriptive of one of the periodical gatherings of the Society.
The following passage is of especial interest to us, as it shows how Faraday
impressed a young contemporary:—

"But hark! A voice arises near the chair!
Its liquid sounds glide smoothly through the air;
The listening Muse with rapture bends to view
The place of speaking and the speaker too.
Neat was the youth in dress, in person plain;
His eye read thus, Philosopher-in-grain;
Of understanding clear, reflection deep;
Expert to apprehend, and strong to keep.
His watchful mind no subject can elude,
Nor specious arts of sophist e'er delude;
His powers, unshackled, range from pole to pole;
His mind from error free, from guilt his soul.
Warmth in his heart, good humour in his face,
A friend to mirth, but foe to vile grimace;
A temper candid, manner unassuming,
Always correct, yet always unpresuming.
Such was the youth, the chief of all the band;
His name well known, Sir Humphry's right hand.
With manly ease towards the chair he bends,
With Watts' logic at his finger-ends,
'I rise (but shall not on the theme enlarge)
To show my approbation of this charge:
If proved it be, the censure should be passed
Or this offence be neither worst nor last.
A precedent will stand from year to year,
And 'tis the usual practice we shall hear.
Extreme severity 'tis right to shun,
For who could stand were justice only done?
And yet experience does most clearly show
Extreme indulgence oft engenders woe.
In striving then to hit the golden mean—
To knowledge, prudence, wisdom, virtue seen—
Let Isaac then be censured, not in spite
But merely to evince our love of right.
Truth, order, justice, cannot be preserved
Unless the laws which rule us are observed.
I for the principle alone contend,

I for the principle alone contend,
Would lash the crime, but make the man my friend.'"

Faraday's progress during these first few years after his reinstatement at the
Royal Institution was rapid: his lectures to the City Philosophical Society,
his published papers, and his letters, all give evidence of it. In 1817, as in
the previous year, he delivered six lectures before the Society. It is
interesting to find that instead of being written out word for word, the
lectures were now delivered from notes, showing how the young lecturer
was becoming so assured of his own command of language as to make the
earlier method no longer necessary. His common-place book for this year
continues to show a wide range of reading and thoughtfulness. In the
summer, when the lectures at the Institution had ceased for the recess,
Faraday availed himself of an invitation from his friend Huxtable, who was
living at South Moulton, and spent a month holiday-making in Devonshire.
His early impressions of that county, when he passed through it with Davy
on their way to the Continent, must have made him especially delighted to
visit it once more; more particularly as he had an opportunity on this
occasion of making geological excursions and of studying "wavellite,
hydrargellite, and such hard things." A letter which he wrote from
Barnstaple to his mother during this holiday is interesting, referring as it
does to those country occupations amid which she, in her girlhood, passed
her time:—"I have seen a great deal of country life since I left town, and am
highly pleased with it, though I should by no means be contented to live
away from town. I have been at sheep-shearings, merry-makings,
junketings, etc., and was never more merry; and I must say of the country
people (of Devonshire, at least) that they are the most hospitable I could
imagine. I have seen all your processes of threshing, winnowing, cheese
and butter-making, and think I could now give you some instruction, but all
I have to say to you on these subjects shall be said verbally."
Each year of his life at this period Faraday found himself becoming busier
than the previous one. Another five chemical lectures (on the metals, well
known and little known) were given before the City Philosophical Society
during 1818, completing a course, extending over three years, of seventeen
lectures on the chemical science, no mean accomplishment for a young man
from twenty-three to twenty-six years of age. So much was his time now
becoming occupied that we find a great falling-off in his letters this year, a

falling-off not only in number, but also in length. The correspondence with
Abbott, commenced six years earlier, practically comes to an end in 1818;
there was not, it is necessary to mention, the slightest abatement in the
warmth of affection of the two friends; it was that, to a great extent,
perhaps, the correspondence had done its work, and what is undoubtedly the
more powerful reason, our young scientist was beginning to find his time so
well occupied with his favourite work that he could not devote enough of it
to the writing of long letters. Abbott was yet, and always, sure of the
heartiest hand-shake and the most unaffected welcome from one who to the
end of his life was the staunchest of friends.
On July 1st, 1818, Faraday read a highly interesting paper before the
members of the City Philosophical Society, on "Observations on the Inertia
of the Mind," in which he drew, in an able manner, an analogy between a
state of the mind and what in the physical world is known as the inertia of
matter. It may be of interest to note a few passages from this lecture to
illustrate the thoughtfulness and thoroughness of Faraday's work at this
time, and also to give an example of his early style as a lecturer.
"Unlike the animated world around him, which remains in the same
constant state, man is continually varying, and it is one of the noblest
prerogatives of his nature, that in the highest of earthly distinctions he has
the power of raising and exalting himself continually. The transition state of
man has been held up to him as a memento of his weakness; to man
degraded it may be so with justice; to man as he ought to be it is no
reproach; and in knowledge that man only is to be contemned and despised
who is not in a state of transition....
"By advancement on the plain of life, I mean advancement in those things
which distinguish men from beasts—sentient advancement. It is not he who
has soared above his fellow-creatures in power, it is not he who can
command most readily the pampering couch or the costly luxury; but it is
he who has done most good to his fellows, he who has directed them in the
doubtful moment, strengthened them in the weak moment, aided them in
the moment of necessity, and enlightened them in their ignorance, that leads
the ranks of mankind....
"There is a power in natural philosophy, of an influence universal, and yet
withal so obscure, in its nature so unobtrusive, that for many ages no idea of

it existed. It is called inertia. It tends to retain every body in its present
state, and seems like the spirit of constancy impressed upon matter.
Whatever is in motion is by it retained in motion, and whatever is at rest
remains at rest under its sway. It opposes every new influence, strengthens
every old one. Is there nothing in the human mind which seems analogous
to this power?...
"Inertia is an essential property of matter; is it a never-failing attendant on
the mind? I hope it is; for as it seems to be in full force whenever the mind
is passive, I trust it is also in power when she is actively engaged. Was the
idle mind ever yet pleased to be placed in activity? Was the dolt ever
willing to resign inanity for perception? Or are they not always found
contented to remain as if they were satisfied with their situation? They are
like the shepherd Magnus: although on a barren rock, their efforts to
remove are irksome and unpleasant; and they seem chained to the spot by a
power over which they have no control, of which they have no perception.
Again: in activity, what intellectual being would resign his employment?
Who would be content to forego the pleasures hourly crowding upon him?
Each new thought, perception, or judgment is a sufficient reward in itself
for his past labours, and all the future is pure enjoyment. There is a labour
in thought, but none who have once engaged in it would willingly resign it.
Intermissions I speak not of; 'tis the general habit and tenor of the mind that
concerns us, and that which has once been made to taste the pleasures of its
own voluntary exertions will not by a slight cause be made to forego them.
"Inertia, as it regards matter, is a term sufficiently well understood both in a
state of rest and of motion. As it is not my intention to attempt a description
of functions of the mind according to strict mathematical terms, I shall
resign the exclusive use of the word at present, and adopt two others,
which, according to the sense they have acquired from usage, will, I
believe, supply its place with accuracy. Apathy will represent the inertia of a
passive mind; industry that of an active mind.
"It is curious to consider how we qualify ideas essentially the same,
according to the words made use of to represent them. I might talk of
mental inertia for a long time without attaching either blame or praise to it
—without the chance even of doing so; but mention apathy and industry,
and the mind simultaneously censures the one and commends the other. Yet

the things are the same, both idleness and industry are habits, and habits
result from inertia....
"Inertia has a sway as absolute in natural philosophy over moving bodies as
over those at rest. It therefore does not retard motion or change, but is as
frequently active in continuing that state as in opposing it. Now, is this the
case with mental inertia?"
These passages from Faraday's early lectures serve to show us not only how
he was attaining the art of expressing himself clearly, but how thoroughly
he went into a subject on which he had once entered. It is not possible to
follow in detail the work on which Faraday was engaged. We have seen him
learning assiduously, and essaying to teach in the friendly circle of the
Philosophical Society. His work during the next few years continued on
very similar lines to those which we have been regarding. Year by year,
about this time, his scientific writing increased—his work was increasing,
his friends were increasing—he was beginning to be "somebody," though as
yet but in a small world. He had commenced a correspondence with
Professor G. de la Rive—the gentleman who at Geneva had been so struck
by him when he was acting as Davy's travelling factotum—a
correspondence which on the death of De la Rive was continued with his
son, Professor Auguste de la Rive.
In 1821 Faraday married. Before, however, we treat of this important step in
his life, let us glance at the journal which he kept of a walking tour he took
in Wales during the summer of 1819. This journal gives us further evidence
of the genuine enjoyment which he found in scenery and nature in her
wilder and more impressive aspects; it also gives further evidence of his
simple yet direct way of describing things, of that true descriptive power of
which his Continental journal was often a good illustration. At five o'clock
in the morning of July 10th, he mounted the top of the Regulator coach at
the White Horse Cellar, Piccadilly, and at ten o'clock of the same evening
was set down at Bristol. Not at all a bad coach-ride for one day's journey.
He afterwards visited Cardiff, and went over the Dowlais Ironworks at
Merthyr; thence he and his companion wandered about at their own sweet
will, unconfined by any artificial circumstances. They walked in that
manner which adds so great a charm to a walking tour, never knowing one
day whither they should bend their way on the next. The following is a

delightful bit descriptive of a visit to the Fall of Scwd-yv-hên-rhyd, or
Glentaree, formed by the descent of the River Hên-rhyd.
"Monday, 19th.—Proceeding onward into Brecknockshire, we suddenly
heard the roar of water where we least expected it, and came on the edge of
a deep and woody dell. Entering among the trees, we scrambled onwards
after our guide, tumbling and slipping, and jumping, and swinging down the
steep sides of the dingle, sometimes in the path of a running torrent,
sometimes in the projecting fragments of slate, and sometimes where no
path or way at all was visible. The thorns opposed our passage, the boughs
dashed the drops in our faces, and stones frequently slipped from beneath
our feet into the chasm below, in places where the view fell uninterrupted
by the perpendicular sides of the precipices. By the time we had reached the
bottom of the dingle, our boots were completely soaked, and so slippery
that no reliance could be placed on steps taken in them. We managed,
however, very well, and were amply rewarded by the beauty of the fall
which now came in view. Before us was a chasm enclosed by high
perpendicular and water-worn rocks of slate, from the sides of which sprang
a luxuriant vegetation of trees, bushes, and plants. In its bosom was a basin
of water, into which fell from above a stream divided into minute drops
from the resistance of its deep fall. Here and there lay trunks of trees which
had been brought down by the torrent—striking marks of its power—and
the rugged bed of shingles and rocky masses further heightened the idea
other objects were calculated to give of the force it possessed when swelled
by rains. We stepped across the river on a few tottering and slippery stones
placed in its bed, and passing beneath the overhanging masses ran round on
projecting points, until between the sheet of water and the rock over which
it descended; and there we remained some time admiring the scene. Before
us was the path of the torrent, after the fine leap which it made in this place;
but the abundance of wood hid it ere it had proceeded many yards from the
place where it fell. No path was discernible from hence, and we seemed to
be enclosed on a spot from whence there was no exit, and where no cry for
help could be heard because of the torrent-roar."
Yet another passage should be quoted from this journal; a passage
descriptive of an ascent of Cader Idris during a thunder-storm. A thunder-
storm was, all his life long, one of the most moving things to Faraday. It
seemed always to quicken him into new life.

CADER IDRIS.
"Sunday, July 26th.—Ascent of Cader Idris. The thunder had gradually
become more and more powerful, and now rain descended. The storm had
commenced at the western extremity of the valley, and rising up Cader Idris
traversed it in its length, and then passing over rapidly to the south-east,
deluged the hills with rain. The waters descended in torrents from the very
tops of the highest hills in places where they had never yet been observed,
and a river which ran behind the house into the lake below rose
momentarily, overflowing its banks, and extended many yards over the
meadows. The storm then took another direction, passing over our heads to
the spot in the west at which it had commenced, and having been very
violent in its course, seemed there to be exhausted and to die away. The
scene altogether was a very magnificent one—the lightning's vivid flash
illuminated those parts which had been darkened by its humid habitation,

and the thunder's roar seemed the agonies of the expiring clouds as they
dissolved into rain; whilst the mountains in echoes mocked the sounds, and
laughed at the fruitless efforts of the elements against them."
The journeying was continued on to Dolgelly and Llangollen; and then back
again to London, and to work on in his old indefatigable manner. Sir
Humphry Davy was in Italy in 1818-19, investigating the questions with
regard to the unrolling of papyri recovered from the ruins of Herculaneum.
In February, 1819, he wrote to Faraday saying, "I have sent a report on the
state of the MSS. to our Government, with a plan for the undertaking of
unrolling; one part of the plan is to employ a chemist for the purpose at
Naples; should they consent, I hope I shall have to make a proposition to
you on the subject." At the end of the same year Davy again wrote to his
protégé in a similar strain, but nothing ever came of it. And delighted as
Faraday would doubtless have been to re-visit Italy, he probably would not
have undertaken the few months' work at Naples if it had meant, as it would
doubtless have done, his severing his connection with the Royal Institution.
A much more important step was about to be taken by Faraday. He had a
friend, also a member and elder of the Sandemanian Church, by name
Barnard. Mr. Barnard was a silversmith who lived in Paternoster Row, and
thither Faraday often went, attracted by the charms of Mr. Barnard's third
daughter, Sarah. Faraday was at this time twenty-nine years of age, the lady
who was to exercise so great an influence over his life was but twenty, and
what is more she did not favour his advances. At last, in July, 1820, he
wrote to her, and in a letter characterised by the depth no less than the
warmth of his affection, begged at any rate to be heard. Such letters,
intended for the eyes of but one person, are, as a rule, and it is well they
should be, too sacred to be freely reproduced for all the world to read. The
letters have, however, before been printed, and it may assist us in forming a
correct picture of Michael Faraday—of the earnest, affectionate nature
which was his—to re-peruse a passage such as this:—
"Again and again I attempt to say what I feel, but I cannot. Let me,
however, claim not to be that selfish being that wishes to bend your
affections for his own sake only. In whatever way I can best minister to
your happiness, either by assiduity or by absence, it shall be done. Do not
injure me by withdrawing your friendship, or punish me for aiming to be

more than a friend by making me less; and if you cannot grant me more,
leave me what I possess, but hear me."
Miss Barnard showed the letter from which this passage is quoted to her
father, whose reply was merely to the effect that "love made philosophers
into fools." Doubtful of her own decision on so momentous a question as
this, involving the life-long happiness of two persons, Miss Barnard
postponed making an immediate decision by accompanying a married sister
to Ramsgate. Faraday made up his mind "to run all risks of a kind reception
at Ramsgate." He went there, and after a week of delightful holiday-
making, returned to London on August the 7th, having won the consent of
her for whom he had evinced so strong a passion. Within twelve months (on
June 12th, 1821), Michael Faraday and Sarah Barnard were married, and
took up their residence in the Royal Institution. The union proved a perfect
one, and a wedded life of nearly half-a-century's duration and of unclouded
love was the result. From this time forward the kindliness, the affection, the
love of home and of those persons forming "home," which had been earlier
so marked in Faraday's letters to his mother, become even yet more marked
in the letters written to his wife any time between his marriage and his
death. Some of these we shall note as we come to treat of the period in
which they were written.

From a drawing by] MRS. MICHAEL FARADAY.
[Alexander Blaikley.
The year 1820 was an important one to Faraday for other though less
significant reasons: in it his first paper was read before the Royal Society,
and he was also engaged with a Mr. Stodart, surgical instrument maker, in
experimenting on alloys of steel with a view to improving its quality. For
many years after, we are told, Faraday used to present his friends with
razors made of a particular alloy discovered at this time. The paper

embodying the results of these experiments in alloys was duly published in
the Quarterly Journal of Science.
A description of our hero (for hero he was—one of our true "heroes of
peace"), written by a friend about the time of his marriage, is interesting as
assisting us to realise what manner of man he really was in the flesh. "A
young-looking man of about thirty years of age, well made, and neat in his
dress, his cheerfulness of disposition often breaking out in a short crisp
laugh, but thoughtful enough when something important is to be done."
We find Faraday now a young man of thirty, happily married, with a large
circle of friends who are finding in him something of that genius which year
by year henceforward was to manifest itself; we find him not only gaining
the goodwill of these friends for his talents, but gaining their affectionate
regard by his unselfishness and unremitting good nature. After their
marriage in June, 1821, Mr. and Mrs. Faraday took up their residence in the
Institution, where they continued to live for close upon forty years.
Although fortune seemed thus to be smiling upon Michael Faraday it must
not be supposed that his position at the Royal Institution was a highly
remunerative one, his position was yet nominally that of laboratory
assistant, and the return which he received for his services was a salary of
one hundred pounds per annum, a suite of rooms, and coal and gas.
One month after his marriage Faraday made his confession of sin and
profession of faith before the Sandemanian Church. It is characteristic of
his whole attitude towards religion, and the great and serious regard which
it demands from every individual, that when his wife asked him why he had
not told her what he was about to do, he simply yet earnestly answered,
"That is between me and my God." Truth in all things was what he aimed
at, and his whole life may be said to be a seeking after truth in the various
branches of knowledge; to half know a thing was never sufficient for him,
he could not rest there; he must test its truth, and either cast it away, having
proved it worthless, or accept it with delight, having proved its truth. This is
evidenced in all his life-work, in his social intercourse no less than in his
scientific work, in his letters and journals no less than in his lectures and
published papers.
A circumstantial account has appeared in some of the newspapers of
Faraday's secession from the Sandemanian Church, and his penitent return

to it. Not having seen any reference to such a secession in the biographies
of Faraday I wrote to Miss Barnard, who in the following note, most
emphatically denies the truth of the story:—"Faraday never seceded from
the Church of which he became a member early in life (1821). It is true that
for a few weeks in 1844 there was a cessation of his communion with this
Church, but the reasons for this were absolutely private, and had nothing to
do with any conflict in his mind between his faith in the Scriptures and his
scientific work. The statement is altogether without foundation, and neither
the scene described nor anything like it ever took place.
"10 Aug., 1891. Jane Barnard."

CHAPTER V.
"Science which I Loved."

"If I would strive to bring back times, and try
The world's pure gold, and wise simplicity;
If I would virtue set as she was young,
And hear her speak with one, and her first tongue;
If holiest friendship naked to the touch,
I would restore and keep it ever such;
I need no other arts but study thee,
Who prov'st all these were, and again may be."
Ben Jonson.

The year of Faraday's marriage which, as we have seen in the previous
chapter, was also important to him in other ways, was marked by one
unpleasant incident which was talked about for some time afterward; but
although Faraday was then spoken of in no measured terms, it has been
conclusively shown that far from any blame being attached to him, the facts
of the case are much to his credit. To put the matter shortly it was this. Dr.
Wollaston had an idea as to the possibility of electro-magnetic rotation; he
expected, in other words, to be able to demonstrate that the "wire in the
voltaic circuit would revolve on its own axis." He was at the Institution one
day in the early part of 1821, and was making an experiment in the
laboratory with Sir Humphry Davy. Faraday, who was not present during
the experiment, came in in time to hear the conversation that followed. He
afterwards made various experiments on this subject, and was invited by the
editor of the Annals of Philosophy to contribute an historical sketch of
electro-magnetism. This sketch appeared in the Annals of the same year;
Faraday repeating nearly all of the experiments to which he referred. These
experiments of Faraday's led him to the discovery, early in September, of
the "rotation of a wire in voltaic current round a magnet, and of a magnet
round the wire." He could not make the wire and the magnet revolve on

their own axis. "There was not the slightest indication that such was the
case."
Before he published the paper descriptive of these "new electro-magnetical
motions," Faraday essayed to see Dr. Wollaston that he might get
permission to refer to Wollaston's experiments. The doctor was out of town,
and the paper was published "by an error of judgment" without any
reference to his opinions and intentions. Directly afterwards Faraday was
extremely distressed at hearing rumours which "affected his honour and his
honesty." He wrote at once, not only to Stodart, but directly to Dr.
Wollaston, whom he met, and after mutual explanation the matter dropped.
Faraday, however, continued his electro-magnetic experiments. It is one of
these that is referred to by his brother-in-law, who was with him one
Christmas Day when: "All at once he exclaimed, 'Do you see, do you see,
do you see, George?' as the small wire began to revolve. I shall never forget
the enthusiasm expressed in his face, and the sparkling in his eyes."
In the summer of 1822 Faraday was at Swansea for a fortnight with
Phillips, the editor of the Philosophical Magazine. Before starting,
however, he took his wife and her mother down to Ramsgate, whither he
addressed to his wife three letters, in which are evident the deep feelings
which were his in regard to their relations. The first letter was written on his
arrival in town after leaving Ramsgate. After detailing what he has done, he
breaks off, "And now, my dear girl, I must set business aside. I am tired of
the dull detail of things, and want to talk of love to you; and surely there
can be no circumstance under which I can have more right. The theme was
a cheerful and delightful one before we were married, but it is doubly so
now.... Oh, my dear Sarah, poets may strive to describe and artists to
delineate the happiness which is felt by two hearts truly and mutually
loving each other; but it is beyond their efforts, and beyond the thoughts
and conceptions of anyone who has not felt it. I have felt it and do feel it,
but neither I nor any other man can describe it; nor is it necessary. We are
happy, and our God has blessed us with a thousand causes why we should
be so. Adieu for to-night."
The letters from Swansea give an account of his journey, and of his host's
house, of work at the copper furnaces, and other places; of the many people
there are at Mr. Vivian's (with whom he was staying), and of the late and
long dinner, which he made up his mind to avoid if possible. He stayed out

walking one evening, got back after dinner had commenced, and so stole up
to his own room that he might write a long letter to his wife, in reply to one
which he had received from her. "I could almost rejoice at my absence from
you," he wrote, "if it were only that it has produced such an earnest and
warm mark of affection from you as that letter. Tears of joy and delight fell
from my eyes on its perusal."
Early in the following year Faraday was experimenting on chlorine, a
subject that had attracted a great deal of Davy's attention. At Davy's
suggestion he enclosed some of the gas in an hermetically sealed glass tube,
that he might "work with it under pressure, and see what would happen by
heat." What "happened" was that on several occasions the tube exploded,
twice doing injury to Faraday's eyes. On one of the occasions when Faraday
was at work, Dr. Paris happened to enter the laboratory, and seeing an oily
liquid in the tube rallied him on his carelessness in using dirty vessels.
When, afterwards, the end of the tube was filed off, there was an explosion,
and the oily matter disappeared. Early on the following day Dr. Paris
received this note:—

"Dear Sir,—The oil you noticed yesterday turns out to be liquid
chlorine.
"Yours faithfully, M. Faraday."

He had in fact succeeded in converting chlorine gas into a liquid by means
of its own pressure. This was an important discovery which led to numerous
experiments with other gases, and with like results.
On May 1st, 1823, Faraday's certificate as a candidate for fellowship in the
Royal Society was read for the first time. Such a distinction was no doubt a
coveted one in Faraday's eyes, and it must have been extremely painful to
him when he found that Sir Humphry Davy was opposed to his election. It
is interesting to observe, however, that the very first signature on his
certificate is that of Dr. Wollaston. Such being the case it seems impossible
that the old charge against Faraday in regard to electro-magnetic rotation
could have been revived, and yet so it was. Wollaston himself had
expressed perfect satisfaction, and the matter seemed definitely settled.
Much as this revival of an untrue charge must have distressed a man of
Faraday's uncompromising integrity, to find Davy, of all men, opposing him

must have been yet more distressing. That Davy's opposition was active
may be surmised from the following, which is told by Faraday himself: "Sir
H. Davy told me I must take down my certificate. I replied that I had not
put it up; that I could not take it down, as it was put up by my proposers. He
then said I must get my proposers to take it down. I answered that I knew
they would not do so. Then he said, I, as President, will take it down. I
replied that I was sure Sir H. Davy would do what he thought was for the
good of the Royal Society."
This attitude of Davy's naturally pained Faraday exceedingly; many years
afterwards some allusion by a friend to his early life led up to a mention of
it; Faraday rose abruptly from his seat, and took a rapid walk up and down
the room, saying, "Talk of something else, and never let me speak of this
again. I wish to remember nothing but Davy's kindness." There were tears
in his eyes as he spoke, showing how deeply the man was moved. Faraday
also said that Davy had walked for an hour about the courtyard of Somerset
House, arguing with one of his proposers that Faraday should not be
elected. We know none of the reasons for Davy's opposition, and his
attitude in this affair must ever remain a cloud on his fair fame; that he, a
self-made man, who had risen to the first position among modern chemists,
should oppose at this stage of his career a man somewhat similarly
circumstanced, who was also moving upwards step by step to one of the
highest positions among modern philosophers, as he loved always to be
called, is indeed as strange as it is regrettable. The fact, sad as it is, has to be
noted; but we will not dwell upon it; more gratifying is it to learn how,
when the ballot was taken, Michael Faraday was almost unanimously
elected a Fellow of the Royal Society, there being but one black ball. This,
in after years, he proudly mentioned, was the only one among his
innumerable honours that he had sought for. Scarce a year passed
afterwards but some fresh distinction was conferred upon him.
Early in 1824 John Wilson Croker, with Sir Thomas Lawrence, Sir F.
Chantrey, and Sir H. Davy founded the Athenæum Club, which still
flourishes. For a short while Faraday acted as honorary secretary to the
Club; but his more congenial scientific labours could not be neglected, and
he soon retired from the secretaryship, in which he was succeeded by his
friend Magrath, who continued to hold the post for many years.

Faraday's notes and papers contributed to the scientific journals and other
periodicals were frequent, but it would profit little here to detail them. One
discovery he made about this time is well worthy of mention as it has had
an important effect on a particular industry—the discovery was that of
benzol, benzine, or as Faraday named it, "bicarburet of hydrogen." This is
prepared now in large quantities, being employed in the manufacture of
aniline colours.
We have it on the authority of Sir Roderick Murchison that Faraday's first
lecture at the Royal Institution was delivered in the following
circumstances. Brande, who had succeeded Sir Humphry Davy as the
Professor of Chemistry, was delivering a course of lectures; one day the
lecturer, owing to illness or some other cause, was absent, but his assistant
(Faraday) took his place, and lectured with so much ease that he won the
complete approval of his audience. In this connection too, it is interesting to
note that it was towards the close of this same year that Faraday began his
experiments in magnetic electricity, the particular branch of research which
was to occupy a great part of his later life, and in which he was destined to
make some of his most brilliant discoveries.

THE LABORATORY, ROYAL INSTITUTION.

It is pleasing to find that whatever may have been Davy's object in opposing
Faraday's election into the Royal Society, he did not bear him any continued
ill-will; this is shown us not only by Davy's expressions of goodwill in his
letters, but by such things as an entry in the minutes of a meeting of the
managers of the Royal Institution in February, 1825. From this entry we
learn that Sir Humphry Davy, "having stated that he considered the talents
and services of Mr. Faraday, assistant in the laboratory, entitled to some
mark of approbation from the managers, and these sentiments having met
the cordial concurrence of the board; Resolved:—That Mr. Faraday be
appointed Director of the Laboratory, under the superintendence of the
Professor of Chemistry."
It was after receiving this appointment that Faraday occasionally invited
members of the Institution to evening meetings in the laboratory, when he
generally had something new and interesting to show them. In these
meetings in the laboratory was the origin of those regular Friday evening
meetings in the theatre, which commenced in 1826, which have had for
many years a world-wide reputation, and which have drawn together, week
after week and year after year, large numbers of persons interested in
science and in its popular exposition. In 1826, the year in which the first
regular Friday evening meetings took place, seventeen lectures were
delivered, six of them being given by Faraday himself, on such a variety of
subjects as "Caoutchouc," "Lithography," "Brunel's Tunnel at Rotherhithe,"
etc. His aim in inaugurating these "Friday evenings" may be gathered from
the scanty notes which he made for introducing one of the earliest of the
lectures:—"Evening opportunities—interesting, amusing; instructive also:
—scientific research—abstract reasoning, but in a popular way—dignity;—
facilitate our object of attracting the world, and making ourselves with
science attractive to it."
These notes, slight as they are, give us an idea of what Faraday's objects
were, and are at the same time interesting, as they may fairly be said to
represent the aim of a large part of his lecturing work throughout his career,
the aim that is, which always seemed to be his, to make the subject of which
he was speaking amusing, interesting, and instructive. No other man had
ever succeeded in attracting the world to science by making the science
attractive to them. High as is Faraday's position as a scientist and
philosopher, he is also to be remembered with much gratitude as, in point of

time as well as of ability, the first of all true popularisers of science. This
may not at first sound a very high title to bestow, but yet it is far from an
insignificant one, and one that must indeed have gratified Faraday; much as
he was pleased with the acknowledgment of himself as one of their peers by
such men as Davy, De la Rive, and other scientists, the knowledge that he
was interpreting the wonders of Nature to a vast number of persons hitherto
ignorant, or in a measure ignorant, of her marvellous ways, was yet more
pleasing to him. We can fully understand his echoing the sentiment which
the late James Russell Lowell, speaking of the poet, expresses in the
following beautiful verses:—

"It may be glorious to write
Thoughts that shall glad the two or three
High souls, like those far stars that come in sight
Once in a century;—

"But better far it is to speak
One simple word, which now and then
Shall waken their free nature in the weak
And friendless sons of men;

"To write some earnest verse or line,
Which, seeking not the praise of art,
Shall make a clearer faith and manhood shine
In the untutored heart.

"He who doth this in verse or prose,
May be forgotten in his day,
But surely shall be crowned at last with those
Who live and speak for aye."

In 1827 Faraday's first book—On Chemical Manipulation—was produced.
Faraday had published a short while before an account of some discovery
he had made with respect to the existence of fluid sulphurs; in this year he
writes:—"I have just learned that Signor Bellani had observed the same fact
in 1813. M. Bellani complains of the manner in which facts and theories
which have been published by him are afterwards given by others as new

discoveries; and though I find myself classed with Gay-Lussac, Sir H.
Davy, Daniell and Bostock, in having thus erred, I shall not rest satisfied
without making restitution, for M. Bellani in this instance certainly deserves
it at my hand." This is worthy of note as a slight illustration of the true
integrity of Faraday's character; much as he valued any original discovery
he might make, he valued much more that absolute truth which made him
render honour to any predecessor even at his own expense; this was done,
too, always as a matter of course, without the slightest spirit of grudging.
His behaviour on such occasions, which are indeed too trying to most
persons, had perhaps a great deal to do with the feeling which he awakened
in all who came in contact with him. Never, perhaps, was there a more
unselfish, as there was never a more universally beloved, man. "His
friendship," as Professor Tyndall says, "was energy and inspiration."
Faraday was appointed member of a "committee for the improvement of
glass for optical purposes;" one of the results of his investigation was that
when delivering, in 1829, the Bakerian lecture at the Royal Institution, he
took for his subject, "The Manufacture of Glass for Optical Purposes." For
further investigation of this subject a special experimenting room and
furnace had been built at the Institution in 1827, and a special assistant—
Sergeant Anderson—engaged to assist Faraday. One chief object of these
experiments was to improve the glasses of telescopes. This desired result
was, however, not attained, although some notable work was done; the glass
then manufactured, for instance, became invaluable in some of Faraday's
later researches. In 1830 the glass-making investigation stopped, and in the
year following the committee presented their report to the Royal Society
which had appointed them.
The recognition of Faraday's importance in the world of science was now
made more manifest each year; not only were honours done him by various
English and Continental societies, but in 1826 the managers of the Royal
Institution "relieved him from his duty as chemical assistant at the lectures
because of his occupation in research." In 1829 he was invited to attend the
meetings of the managers. In 1827 he had been offered the Professorship of
Chemistry in London University, but much as he felt the honour which was
done him, Faraday declined it, and from the noblest of motives, as will be
seen in this passage from his letter to Dr. Lardner on the subject.

"I think it a matter of duty and gratitude on my part to do what I can for the
good of the Royal Institution in the present attempt to establish it firmly.
The Institution has been a source of knowledge and pleasure to me for the
last fourteen years; and though it does not pay me in salary for what I now
strive to do for it, yet I possess the kind feelings and goodwill of its
authorities and members, and all the privileges it can grant or I require; and,
moreover, I remember the protection it has afforded me during the past
years of my scientific life."
In 1829 he was offered, and accepted, as it did not interfere with his Royal
Institution work, a post as lecturer in chemistry at the Royal Academy,
Woolwich.
In the same year died Sir Humphry Davy—the great chemist to whom
Faraday owed so much, and to whom, as we have shown, he remained
deeply attached to the last. Davy had fought his way up as Faraday had
done, but, unlike Faraday, had been in a measure spoiled by his success; he
had very little self-control, and but little method and order, and was,
perhaps, too anxious about his fame,—about how he would stand in the
eyes of men. With Faraday it was far different—he aimed at truth in his
knowledge, and cared but little for what the world might consider as
success. He was known to say, referring to his experiments under Davy,
"that the greatest of all his great advantages was that he had a model to
teach him what to avoid." Faraday and Davy were, nevertheless, friends to
the last, and the death of the latter at the comparatively early age of fifty-
two must have been a great blow to the younger man.
The year 1831 is an important one in the life of Michael Faraday, for it was
then that he commenced his brilliant series of experiments in electro-
magnetism. It is on his electrical research that his chief claim to be
remembered as a scientist rests. He had earlier experimented in the same
connection, but hitherto without attaining the results which he had
anticipated. But from this time forward he devoted much energy to this
branch of research, with such success that if we pick up any of the most
recent works on electrical science we inevitably find an important position
given in it to the name and discoveries of Michael Faraday. This is not the
place to enter into a description of these experiments, though reference to
them will of course be made later on in this biography in the chapter
devoted to a consideration of Faraday's discoveries. In the year 1833

Faraday was appointed Fullerian Professor of Chemistry in the Royal
Institution for life, without the obligation of having to deliver lectures in
connection with the professorship.
In the year 1834 a boy living in a distant part of England wrote to Professor
Faraday, saying that he was desirous of taking up a scientific career.
Doubtless remembering his own beginning, Faraday sent "by return of post
a kind and courteous reply," which that boy, grown to man's estate, and
known as Doctor J. Scoffern, gratefully referred to in a graceful tribute
which he wrote after Faraday's death. It was during this early part of
Faraday's success that he once gave evidence in a judicial case, when the
scientific testimony was so diverse that the judge, in summing up, levelled
something very like a reproach at the scientific witnesses, saying, "Science
has not shone this day." Faraday would never again appear as a witness in a
court of law.
This is, perhaps, the most fitting place in which we can refer to some slight
account of Faraday's home-life in the Institution, which is given by his
brother-in-law George (Mrs. Faraday's youngest brother) and Miss Reid
(her niece). George Barnard was much with the Faradays in these earlier
times. "All the years I was with Harding I dined at the Royal Institution," he
says. "After dinner we nearly always had our games just like boys—
sometimes at ball, or with horse-chestnuts instead of marbles—Faraday
appearing to enjoy them as much as I did, and generally excelling us all.
Sometimes we rode round the theatre on a velocipede, which was then a
new thing." It is said "that sometimes of an early summer morning the
philosopher was to be seen going up Hampstead Hill on this velocipede."
Barnard tells, too, of Faraday's unflagging good spirits and his faculty for
entering with keen enjoyment into any fun that was going forward—pic-
nics up the river, with rustic cookery, charades, or anything else the party
seemed bent upon, Faraday would join in with delight; how he used to
attend Hullmandel's conversaziones, where he met many of the leading
singers and artists of the day—Garcia and Malibran, Sir Edwin Landseer,
Clarkson Stanfield, J. M. W. Turner, and indeed most of the members of the
Royal Academy. The last-named artist often applied to Faraday for
chemical information about his pigments; upon Turner, and all artists who
made similar requests, Faraday would always impress the importance there
was in their prosecuting experiments with regard to their colours

themselves, giving them a hint to put some of their colour and colour-
washes in a bright sunlight, covering up one half and leaving the other
exposed, and then observing the effect of light and gases on the latter. Mr.
Barnard says that during their various country trips Faraday was in the habit
of just "rambling about geologising or botanising."
Mrs. Faraday's niece, Miss Reid, was peculiarly well fitted to give
reminiscences of her uncle, as she was for nearly twenty years (from 1826)
one of the family at the Royal Institution. When she first went there Miss
Reid was only a little child; and when her aunt was going out she was taken
down to Faraday's laboratory, where, as she afterwards wrote, "I had, of
course, to sit as still as a mouse, with my needlework; but my uncle would
often stop and give me a kind word or a nod, or sometimes throw a bit of
potassium into water to amuse me."
"In all my childish troubles," Miss Reid continues, "he was my never-
failing comforter, and seldom too busy, if I stole into his room, to spare me
a few minutes; and when perhaps I was naughty and rebellious, how gently
and kindly he would win me round, telling me what he used to feel himself
when he was young, advising me to submit to the reproof I was fighting
against.
"I remember his saying that he found it a good and useful rule to listen to all
corrections quietly, even if he did not see reason to agree with them.
"If I had a difficult lesson, a word or two from him would clear away all my
trouble; and many a long wearisome sum in arithmetic became quite a
delight when he undertook to explain it."
The same lady gives some admirable notes of a holiday the small family
party spent at Walmer, in Kent. How they drove down on the outside of the
coach, and how full of fun Faraday was, when they reached Shooter's Hill,
over Falstaff and the men in buckram; "not a sight nor a sound of interest
escaped his quick eye and ear."
"At Walmer we had a cottage in a field, and my uncle was delighted
because a window looked directly into a blackbird's nest built in a cherry
tree. He would go many times in a day to watch the parent birds feeding
their young."

Sunrise and sunset were never-failing sources of delighted admiration to
him; at such times he was the best of companions, and it has been described
as a great treat to watch the glorious sight with him.
"He carried Galpin's Botany in his pocket, and used to make me examine
any flower new to me as we rested in the fields. The first we got at Walmer
was the Echium vulgare, and is always associated in my mind with his
lesson. For when we met with it a second time he asked, 'What is the name
of that flower?' 'Viper's bugloss,' said I. 'No, no, I must have the Latin
name,' said he."
On one occasion he called his wife and niece into his room to "see a
spectre." It was about ten o'clock in the evening, a thick white mist had
risen. He then placed a candle behind them as they stood by the window,
and they saw two gigantic shadowy beings projected on the mist and
imitating, of course, every movement they made. Faraday had gone to
Walmer for rest and refreshment, and his niece says that she, the young one
of the party, had to inveigle him away from his books and papers to which
he would return, and tempt him out on some excursion to see or find
something, on which occasion he was nothing loth. We see, indeed, at all
times of his life how keen was the delight he took in the company of young
people; how beautifully he could enter into the spirit which animated their
play, as though he was still a child himself, and this valuable faculty was his
up to the latest.
Of the Walmer excursion his niece further says:—"One day he went far out
among the rocks, and brought home a great many wonderful things to show
me; for in those days I had never seen nor heard of hermit crabs and sea
anemones. My uncle seemed to watch them with as much delight as I did;
and how heartily he would laugh at some of the movements of the crabs!
We went one night to look for glow-worms. We searched every bank and
likely place near, but not one did we see. On coming home to our cottage he
espied a tiny speck of light on one of the doorposts. It came from a small
centipede; but though it was put carefully under a glass, it never showed its
light again.
"My uncle read aloud delightfully. Sometimes he gave us one of
Shakespeare's plays or Scott's novels. But of all things I used to like to hear
him read Childe Harold; and never shall I forget the way in which he read

the description of the storm on Lake Leman. He took great pleasure in
Byron, and Coleridge's 'Hymn to Mont Blanc' delighted him. When
anything touched his feelings as he read—and it happened not infrequently
—he would show it not only by tears in his voice, but by tears in his eyes
also. Nothing vexed him more than any kind of subterfuge or prevarication,
or glossing over things."
His niece mentioned on one occasion a professor who had been discovered
abstracting some manuscript from a library. He instantly said, "What do you
mean by abstracting? You should say stealing; use the right word, my dear."
Indecision of any kind Faraday could not bear; not only should one decide,
but quickly. Indeed he thought that in trifling matters immediate decision
was important; it was better to decide incorrectly than to remain hesitating.
As soon as he left his study and laboratory Faraday had the happy faculty of
being able to throw aside his science, and would, on going into the sitting-
room, "enter into all the nonsense that was going on as heartily as any one;
and as we sat round the fire he would often play some childish game, at
which he was usually the best performer; or he would take part in a charade,
and I well recollect his being dressed up to act the villain, and very fierce he
looked. Another time I recollect him as the learned pig."

FARADAY'S STUDY.
As we learn such things as these about him we cease to wonder that
Faraday was the object of so much admiration and love from all persons,
old and young, with whom he came in contact. His wonderful work as a
scientist will, it is to be hoped, never be remembered as his only claim on
our regard; for as one of the best and kindest and most helpful of men,
whose singular modesty and gentleness of character endeared him to all, he
certainly deserves to be kept ever in our recollection. We must not, as a
friend wrote of him, allow the name of Faraday "to be nothing but a peg on
which to hang discoveries;" but must also recollect that his "time, thoughts,
purse, everything was freely given to those who had need of them."

CHAPTER VI.
As Teacher and Preacher.

"'Tis the man who with a man
Is an equal, be he king,
Or poorest of the beggar clan,
Or any other wondrous thing
A man may be."
Keats.

By the commencement of the year 1835 we find Michael Faraday, not yet
forty-four years of age, generally acknowledged as one of their peers by the
leading men of science, not only in England but also on the Continent. We
find him elected member of many of the most important scientific and
philosophical societies of this and other countries; we find him honoured by
the University of Oxford with the degree of D.C.L.; and, as we shall shortly
see, we find the Government proposing to confer a pension on him in
consideration of the services which he has already rendered to science.
Truly a wonderful change to be wrought in the life of a man who thirty
years before was carrying round newspapers as a common errand boy. It is,
however, always gratifying to note, and especially pleasing to remember,
that however successful he might be, Faraday was never spoiled by the
honours that were done him; he was always the same kindly, helpful, simple
man that he had been. Those persons who had the great good fortune to visit
him at the Royal Institution, either at the time of which we are treating or
during his later life, never failed to find a cordial welcome; "a friendly chat
in those quiet rooms was one of the greatest pleasures it was possible to
enjoy. The frugal simplicity of the furniture was characteristic of Faraday."
The Faradays lived quietly to themselves at the Institution, though they
often, after the Friday evening lectures, went round to Berkley Street to tea
to Mr. Richard Barlow's house, that gentleman and his wife always being at
home to their friends after the Friday evenings. On such occasions as these

gatherings, Faraday, we learn, used to be the centre of much interest and
delight; for he had, as may be gathered from what has already been said of
his character, that happy disposition which placed him at once in sympathy
with any person with whom he might be speaking; especially was this rare
sympathy his with regard to children, with whom he seemed at once able to
place himself on an equal footing; and this it was that made his lectures to
young people not only so interesting but so widely popular as they were.
This subject, however, deserves fuller consideration, and will be found
treated in a later chapter.
Had he chosen to do so at this period of his career, Faraday might have been
in receipt of a pretty considerable income. In 1830, indeed, he had
undertaken several commercial analyses, and his income from this source
alone came to as much as a thousand pounds. Such work interfered with his
research, and was therefore unhesitatingly given up, and two years
afterwards his professional gains amounted to but little more than a hundred
and fifty pounds for the year, and in after years they did not reach even that
sum.
Early in 1835 Faraday received an intimation from Sir James South that had
Sir Robert Peel remained in office he had intended conferring a pension
upon him. Faraday wrote in reply, saying that he could not accept a pension.
The matter after this remained in abeyance for a while. During the summer
Faraday spent a short holiday in Switzerland, whence he wrote to his old
friend Magrath: "The weather has been most delightful, and everything in
our favour, so that the scenery has been in the most beautiful condition.
Mont Blanc, above all, is wonderful, and I could not but feel at it what I
have often felt before, that painting is very far beneath poetry in cases of
high expression; of which this is one. No artist should try to paint Mont
Blanc; it is utterly out of his reach. He cannot convey an idea of it, and a
formal mass or a commonplace model conveys more intelligence, even with
respect to the sublimity of the mountain, than his highest efforts can do. In
fact, he must be able to dip his brush in light and darkness before he can
paint Mont Blanc. Yet the moment one sees it Lord Byron's expressions
come to mind, as they seem to apply. The poetry and the subject dignify
each other."
In the autumn of the same year, shortly after his return from the Continent,
the subject of a pension for Faraday was re-opened. The independence and

openness of his character came out in a remarkable manner in this matter.
He was asked to wait upon Lord Melbourne, the Prime Minister, at the
Treasury, which he did on October 26th. However he may have spoken of
Faraday personally, Lord Melbourne spoke of literary and scientific men
with but scant courtesy, and in effect seemed to consider the awarding them
pensions as a piece of State humbug. We have seen how Faraday resented a
slur cast upon science in a court of law, and he was no less indignant on this
occasion; he returned home and wrote a letter, the tone of which though
dignified was very decided. This letter, in which he declined to accept or
even further to consider the acceptance of a pension from the Government,
Faraday intended to forward at once to Lord Melbourne. He finally,
however, allowed somewhat wiser counsels to prevail; his father-in-law,
while justly proud of Michael's scientific attainments, was also a shrewd
business-like man, and persuaded him to write a letter, which, although it
was not one whit less dignified in its tone was less decided in its refusal of
the proposed pension.
After many fruitless efforts to make Faraday change his decision, a lady,
who was a friend both of the philosopher and of the Prime Minister, asked
the former what he would require at the hand of Lord Melbourne to make
him change his mind on the subject. "I should require," he replied, "from
his lordship what I have no right or reason to expect that he would grant—a
written apology for the words he permitted himself to use to me." To
Melbourne's credit, be it said, that as soon as he knew of this he apologised
amply for, as he expressed it, the "too blunt and inconsiderate manner in
which he had expressed himself."
On December 24th of the same year the pension of three hundred pounds a
year was awarded to Michael Faraday for his services to the cause of
science. A pension, it may here be mentioned, half of which was continued
to the Professor's widow, and on her death to his niece, Miss Jane Barnard.
He was not yet forty-five, we must recollect, when he was thought to have
fairly earned this reward. Early in 1836 further honour was done to him by
his being appointed scientific adviser to the Trinity House; in accepting the
position he wrote a characteristic letter, of which the following is a portion;
it was addressed to Captain Pelly, Deputy-Master: "I consider your letter to
me as a great compliment, and should view the appointment at the Trinity
House, which you propose, in the same light; but I may not accept even

honours without due consideration. In the first place my time is of great
value to me, and if the appointment you speak of involved anything like
periodical routine attendances I do not think I could accept it. But if it
meant that in consultation, in the examination of proposed plans and
experiments, in trials, etc., made as my convenience would allow, and with
an honest sense of a duty to be performed, then I think it would consist with
my present engagements.... In consequence of the goodwill and confidence
of all around me, I can at any moment convert my time into money, but I do
not require more of the latter than is sufficient for necessary purposes. The
sum, therefore, of £200 is quite enough in itself, but not if it is to be the
indicator of the character of the appointment. But I think you do not view it
so, and that you and I understand each other in that respect; and your letter
confirms me in that opinion. The position which I presume you would wish
me to hold is analogous to that of a standing counsel. As to the title it might
be what you pleased almost. Chemical adviser is too narrow; for you would
find me venturing into parts of the philosophy of light not chemical.
Scientific adviser (the title afterwards decided upon) you may think too
broad—or in me too presumptuous—and so it would be, if by it was
understood all science.... The thought occurs to me whether, after all, you
want such a person as myself. This you must judge of; but I always
entertain a fear of taking an office in which I may be of no use to those who
engage me."
This letter is, as I have said, characteristic of the writer; it is characteristic
of his sensitiveness to any honour done to him, and of his unworldliness, of
his conscientiousness in making sure that he will be able to perform
anything that he may undertake, and of a half-diffidence with regard to
himself as to whether he was able to do all that was anticipated of him. For
nearly thirty years, with credit to himself and to the Brethren of the Trinity
House, did Michael Faraday continue as their scientific adviser. Frequently
do we find him experimenting on lights and lighting—visiting the various
lighthouses round the coast, trying the electric light for them, comparing the
various lights, and reporting to the Brethren—such work as this is, as has
been said, to be frequently noted in looking over a record of the mass of
work which during these years Faraday was doing. It is pleasing to notice
here that on her husband's death Mrs. Faraday presented such of his
portfolios, of well-ordered and indexed manuscripts, as referred to this part
of his work to the Trinity House. So carefully were these notes made and

kept that it is possible now to refer quite easily to any particular piece of
work on which Faraday was engaged during these thirty years.
In this same year (1836) there appeared the Life of Sir Humphry Davy, by
his brother, Dr. John Davy. In this work statements were made with relation
to Faraday and his patron which were not true; and painful indeed though it
must have been to the former, he felt compelled to deny them. This he did
in a long letter to his friend R. Phillips, editor of the Philosophical
Magazine, in which periodical the letter was published. "I regret," Faraday
wrote, "that Dr. Davy has made that necessary which I did not think before
so; but I feel that I cannot, after his observation, indulge my earnest desire
to be silent on the matter, without incurring the risk of being charged with
something opposed to an honest character. This I dare not risk; but in
answering for myself I trust that it will be understood that I have been
driven unwillingly into utterance."
The subject must indeed have been a painful one; to have to assert his own
right to be the discoverer of certain chemical results which were being
credited to Davy. In one or two cases, when he found that he had been
preceded in the discovery of anything he was the first to acknowledge that
all honour was due to his predecessor, and that strict regard for true honesty
in all things very properly would not allow him to be silent now. He
concludes his letter to Phillips in these words, "Believing that I have now
said enough to preserve my own 'honest fame' from any injury it might have
risked from the mistakes of Dr. Davy, I willingly bring this letter to a close,
and trust that I shall never again have to address you on the subject."
It was at about this time that another incident occurred which illustrates
Faraday's absolute integrity of character—integrity that would not wink at
anything that was in the slightest degree not straightforward, even though it
was against his own interest, which, indeed, rather shunned doing a good
deed that might seem dictated by mere self-interest. His brother was
working at the time as a gas-fitter, and there was a possibility of his getting
the Athenæum Club work in connection with his trade. Michael, writing on
the subject, said, "Few things would please me more than to help my
brother in his business, or than to know that he had got the Athenæum
work; but I am exceedingly jealous of myself, lest I should endeavour to
have that done for him as my brother which the Committee might not like

to do for him as a tradesman, and it is this which makes me very shy of
saying a word about the matter."
During these years Faraday was getting through a vast quantity of work, his
experimental researches in electricity were taking up a great part of his
time, but other matters were not neglected. He was frequently lecturing
before the Royal Institution or the Royal Society; while he wrote a large
number of scientific papers for the various philosophical periodicals to
which he contributed. Besides presenting series after series of his brilliant
Experimental Researches to the Royal Society, he had also to attend to his
lectures at Woolwich, and his work for the Trinity House. He must indeed,
hard-working man that he was, have found his long day very fully
occupied; and it is scarcely to be wondered at that in 1839 the strain began
to tell upon him, and a period of rest became necessary. As years went on,
such periods of rest were more frequent and yet more vitally important.
In 1837 the British Association[8] held its Annual Meeting at Liverpool, and
Faraday attended it, and was made, as he put it, "a most responsible
person," President of the Chemical section. From Liverpool he wrote home
to his wife, "To-day I think we made our section rather more interesting
than was expected, and to-morrow I expect will be good also. In the
afternoon Daniell and I took a quiet walk; in the evening he dined with me
here. We have been since to a grand conversazione at the Town Hall, and I
have now returned to my room to talk with you as the pleasantest and
happiest thing I can do. Nothing rests me so much as communion with you.
I feel it even now as I write; and I catch myself saying the words aloud as I
write them, as if you were within hearing. Dear girl, think of me till
Saturday evening. I find I can get home very well by that time; so you may
expect me.
"Ever, my dear Sarah, your affectionate husband,
"M. Faraday."
This reference to getting home on Saturday evening is especially
interesting, for Faraday always took his wife home to her father's house
every Saturday evening, that she might see her family; they all went to
church together on the Sunday. This was an unvarying rule of Faraday's for
very many years, as long, indeed, as it was possible.

Faraday's mother, after having lived to see "her Michael" come to be one of
the great men of his time, died at Islington in March, 1838. The loss must
have been keenly felt by Faraday, for between mother and son the tenderest
affection had always subsisted. She was justly proud of the position which
her boy had won for himself; and he ever retained that beautiful chivalrous
kindness and deference to his mother that had characterised him all along.
The passages from his earlier letters to his mother which have been given in
previous pages are evidence of this, and his kindly consideration was ever
the same. Much as the death of his mother, and, a few years later, of his
brother Robert, affected him, Faraday had in his beautiful clear-sighted faith
in his religion a source of inextinguishable solace, and looking forward to a
reunion hereafter could see a "beautiful and consoling influence in the
midst of all these troubles."
Severe and long-continued mental work, as I have said, began to tell upon
Faraday in 1839, and he was ordered by his doctor to take an absolute rest.
He suffered from loss of memory and similar symptoms of an overworked
brain. His wife, as her niece tells us, used to carry him off to Brighton, or
somewhere down into the country for a few days when he became dull and
low-spirited, and the rest soon restored him. During such a sojourn at
Brighton, towards the close of 1839, Professor Brande wrote to him, saying
that the doctor said Faraday was to remain thoroughly idle for a time; and
he (Brande) kindly offered at the same time to do anything he could to
relieve Faraday of any routine work. He had indeed read some of Faraday's
electricity lectures at the Institution, although, as he terms it in his letter to
Faraday, "he began to fear the fate of Phæton in the chariot of Phœbus." As
yet, however, Faraday would not take a very long-continued rest, and he
was before long back in Albemarle Street working, although less than he
had been doing.
In the year 1840 Faraday's health made it necessary that his scientific
labours should be reduced, and just about this time, although he was still
adding to his series of Experimental Researches, he was husbanding his
strength as far as possible. This year, too, deserves especial note, for it was
now that he became an elder in the Sandemanian Church; he had before on
some occasions exhorted those present at week-day meetings, but it now
devolved upon him to deliver regular sermons. Faraday, as we have already
seen, on more than one occasion, was not a man to undertake anything

without doing it to the best of his abilities; and if this was his character in
matters of everyday concern, how much more so should we expect it to be,
and not without reason, his character in so vital a question as that
concerning his religion. Or perhaps it would be more correct to say
concerning the more obvious exercise of his religious faith, for the spirit of
his religion coloured all that he did; it was indeed the moving force of his
soul, and was not confined to any narrow circle.

INTERIOR OF THE OLD SANDEMANIAN MEETING-HOUSE,
PAUL'S ALLEY.
The flow and energy which characterised Faraday as a lecturer were
replaced in his sermons by a simplicity and earnestness that together are
best described as true devoutness. His sermons were always extemporary,
although the outlines of them were carefully prepared beforehand, a small
card having noted down on either side of it the heads of the elder's
discourse and reference to such passages in the Bible as he wanted to quote.
One of these cards is given that it may show with what slight notes the
earnest and reverent preacher provided himself. A friend, describing him

officiating at the chapel, which was situated in Paul's Alley, Redcross Street,
City, but which has long since been pulled down, and the Church
transferred to Barnsbury Grove, N., said, "He read a long portion of one of
the Gospels slowly, reverently, and with such an intelligent and
sympathising appreciation of the meaning, that I thought I had never before
heard so excellent a reader."

— 2 Peter iii. 1, 2, 14. A prophetic warning to Christians.

— First, the power and grace and promises of the gospel.
— i. 3, by His power are given great and precious promises,
— 4, divine nature and brethren exhorted to give diligence,
— 5, whilst in this life up to v. 8.

— Then cometh a warning of the state into which they may
— fall, 8, 9, if they forget—as he stirs them up, 12, 13, 15, as
— escapers from the corruption, i. 4.

— iii. 14. Wherefore, beloved, seeing ye LOOK for such things,
— their hope and expectation—it is to stir up their pure mind,
— iii., 1, by way of remembrance—hastening the day of the,
— v. 12, awful as that day will be, 12, 7, because of the
— deliverance from the plague of our own heart.
— 2 Cor. iv. 18, 17, 16, look not at things seen—temporal.
— Titus ii. 13, looking for the hope and glorious appearing.
— Heb. x. 37, yet a little while, and He that shall come will come.

— The world make His forbearance a plea to forget Him or
— deny Him.
— iii. 4, 5, perceiving Him not in His works. His people see
— His mercy and long-suffering and look for His promise, 12,

— 14, and salvation, 15, and learn that He knoweth how to
— reserve, ii 3, 9, and preserve, hence

— they are not to be slothful, Prov. xxiv. 30.
— nor sleeping—Matt xxv. 1. Sleeping virgins
— nor doubting iii. 4.
— nor repining Heb. xii. 12, 3, 5, lift up hands
— Jas. v. 7, 8, be patient—husbandmen
— waiteth, but waiting, Luke xii. 36, 37, 39, 40,
— Peter 41, v. 58, 58 refers to days of long-suffering.

— Wherefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things, beware, etc.,
— danger of falling away in many parts, i. 9, ii. 20, 21, 22,
— great pride of the formal adherers, ii. 19, 13.
— But the assurance is at iii. 18—i. 2, 8.

COPY OF ONE OF THE CARDS FROM WHICH FARADAY
PREACHED.
Another of his listeners said, "His object seemed to be to make the most use
of the words of Scripture, and to make as little of his own words as he
could. Hence a stranger was struck first by the number and rapidity of his
references to texts in the Old and New Testaments, and secondly, by the
devoutness of his manner." Yet another friend, who had been privileged to
hear Faraday preach before his small flock, said of his sermons, "They
struck me as resembling a mosaic work of texts. At first you could hardly
understand their juxtaposition and relationship; but as the well-chosen
pieces were filled in by degrees their congruity and fitness became
developed, and at last an amazing sense of the power and beauty of the
whole filled one's thoughts at the close of the discourse."
This, his first period of eldership in the Church, continued from 1840 until
1844, when a slight misunderstanding having arisen between himself and
the brethren, he for a time relinquished the office; occupying it again,
however, later on in life. His earnest religious feeling was an abiding source
of consolation to him in all his trials; it affected in no slight degree his life

and life-work at all points, although, to his credit be it said, that it was
rather the spirit of his religious feeling which was thus manifested, and it is
not by any means to be understood that he was in even the slightest degree
given to cant, such a thing being far from possible with him. His religion
was a something too sacred and too immediately between himself and his
God, as he said, for him to refer to it, except when circumstances especially
called for it. Then, in the earnest sympathetic words of comfort, which he
addressed to those persons with whom he was intimate when they were in
trouble, we may trace the true deep current of religion, which was so
essentially a part of his nature.
It is interesting to connect the name of our philosopher with a great
institution such as the establishment of the penny post. In 1840 Sir Rowland
Hill tells us in his autobiography that he was sorely puzzled to find an ink
that, having obliterated the postage stamps, should not be removable. "In
my anxiety," he says, "I went so far as to trouble the greatest chemist of the
age. Kindly giving me the needful attention, though in an extremely
depressed state of health, the result of excessive labour, a fact, of course,
unknown to me when I made the application, Mr. Faraday approved of the
course which I submitted to him: viz., that an aqueous ink should be used
both for the stamp and for obliteration."
Referring to this same year we find an interesting entry in Crabb Robinson's
Diary. "May 8th.—Attended Carlyle's second lecture.... It gave great
satisfaction, for it had uncommon thoughts and was delivered with unusual
animation.... In the evening heard a lecture by Faraday. What a contrast to
Carlyle! A perfect experimentalist, with an intellect so clear! Within his
sphere, un uomo compito. How great would that man be who could be as
wise on Mind and its relations as Faraday is on Matter!"
Faraday's life as a scientific experimentalist and discoverer is divided into
two periods by an interval of four years, during which he did but little, or,
compared with his previous performances but little, work. Such a time of
rest was indeed rendered absolutely necessary by loss of memory and
giddiness, which had troubled him occasionally before, and which now put
a stop to his experiments. This period of partial rest commenced with a
three months' trip in Switzerland, where he was accompanied by his wife
and her brother. Dr. Bence Jones says, "In different ways he showed much
of his character during this period of rest. The journal he kept of his Swiss

tour is an image of himself. It was written with excessive neatness, and it
had the different mountain flowers which he gathered in his walks fixed in
it as few but Faraday himself could have fixed them. His letters are free
from the slightest sign of mental disease. His only illness was overwork,
and his only remedy was rest."
A few passages from this Swiss journal are all that can be given. The first
stay of any length was made at Thun, whence many walking excursions
were undertaken, sometimes indeed Faraday walking as much as forty-five
miles in the one day, a sufficient proof that he was not at all bodily ill. The
journal gives us many a word-picture of the scenery and of the people, with
now and then quaint observations and humorous reflections; let the
following passages speak for themselves:—
"July 18th.—Took a long walk to the valley called the Simmenthal, which
goes off from the valley of the lake.... The frogs were very beautiful, lively,
vocal, and intelligent, and not at all fearful. The butterflies, too, became
familiar friends with me, as I sat under the trees on the river's bank. It is
wonderful how much intelligence all these animals show when they are
treated kindly and quietly; when, in fact, they are treated as having their
right and part in creation, instead of being frightened, oppressed, and
destroyed.
"Monday, 19th.—Very fine day; walk with dear Sarah on the lake side to
Oberhofen, through the beautiful vineyards; very busy were the women and
men in trimming the vines, stripping off leaves and tendrils from fruit-
bearing branches. The churchyard was beautiful, and the simplicity of the
little remembrance posts set upon the graves very pleasant. One who had
been too poor to put up an engraved brass plate, or even a painted board,
had written with ink on paper the birth and death of the being whose
remains were below, and this had been fastened to a board and mounted on
the top of a stick at the head of the grave, the paper being protected by a
little edge and roof. Such was the simple remembrance; but nature had
added her pathos, for under the shelter by the writing a caterpillar had
fastened itself and passed into its death-like state of chrysalis; and having
ultimately assumed its final state it had winged its way from the spot, and
had left the corpse-like relics behind. How old and how beautiful is this
figure of the resurrection! surely it can never appear before our eyes
without touching the thoughts.

"Tuesday, 27th.—More pleasant rambles: fine. Now we shall think of a
move, and really the changing character of the table d'hôte and other things
make me in love with the thoughts of home. Dear England, dear home! dear
friends! I long to be in and among them all; and where can I expect to be
more happy, or better off in anything? Dear home, dear friends, what is all
this moving, and bustle, and whirl, and change worth compared to you?
"August 2nd.—Interlaken.... The Jungfrau has been occasionally
remarkably fine: in the morning particularly, covered with tiers of clouds,
whilst the snow between them was beautifully distinct; and in the evening
showing a beautiful series of tints from the base to the summit, according to
the proportion of light on the different parts. At one time the summit was
beautifully bathed in golden light, whilst the middle part was quite blue,
and the snow of its peculiar blue-green colour in the clefts.... Clout-nail
making goes on here rather considerably, and is a very neat and pretty
operation to observe. I love a smith's shop, and anything relating to a
smithy. My father was a smith."
How beautiful is the following description of the waterfall at Brienz Lake:
"The sun shone brightly, and the rainbows seen from various points were
very beautiful. One at the bottom of a fine but furious fall was very
pleasant. There it remained motionless, whilst the gusts and clouds of spray
swept furiously across its place, and were dashed against the rock. It looked
like a spirit strong in faith and steadfast in the storm of passions sweeping
across it; and though it might fade and revive, still it held on to the rock as
in hope, and giving hope, and the very drops which in the whirlwind of
their fury seemed as if they would carry all away were made to revive it and
give it greater beauty."
At length, on September 29th, the small party reach London again, and
Faraday's journal ends thus:—"Crossing the new London Bridge street we
saw M.'s pleasant face, and shook hands; and though we separated in a
moment or two, still we feel and know we are where we ought to be—at
home."
Faraday's allusion to his father in the extract above is very pleasing and
interesting. We are told that he used to like to pay visits to the scenes of his
boyhood and youth, and that he once went to the shop where his father had
formerly been employed as a blacksmith, and asked to be allowed to look

over the place. When he got to a part of the premises at which there was an
opening into the lower workshop, he stopped and said, "I very nearly lost
my life there once. I was playing in the upper room at pitching halfpence
into a pint pot close by this hole, and having succeeded at a certain distance,
I stepped back to try my fortune further off, forgetting the aperture, and
down I fell; and if it had not been that my father was working over an anvil
fixed just below, I should have fallen on it, broken my back, and probably
killed myself. As it was, my father's back just saved mine."
On his return from his Swiss trip, Faraday took up a great part of his work
again, and was fully occupied with a few electrical experiments, lectures,
and Trinity House work. What has been termed his second great period of
research did not commence until 1845. He lectured frequently at the
Institution—so frequently indeed that we cannot refer to them here, but
must leave them to the chapter on his lectures. Indeed, merely to detail the
work which Faraday did would take up considerably more than the whole
space of this little book.
In 1844 Faraday became one of the special commissioners appointed to
investigate the Haswell colliery explosion. In 1846 his brother Robert met
with a fatal accident, and Faraday writes to his wife, who was staying at
Tunbridge Wells:—"Dear Heart,—.... Come home, dear. Come and join in
the sympathy and comfort needed by many.... My sister and her children
have not forgotten the hope in which they were joined together with my
dear Robert, and I see its beautiful and consoling influence in the midst of
all these troubles. I and you, though joined in the same trouble, have part in
the same hope. Come home, dearest.
"Your affectionate husband,
"M. Faraday."
In 1849 he delivered his famous lectures on "The Chemical History of a
Candle;" and in the following year he gave a series of six lectures on "Some
Points of Domestic Chemical Philosophy—a Fire, a Candle, a Lamp, a
Chimney, a Kettle, Ashes." His work during these years is shown in his
many published letters, in his correspondence which for years he
maintained with many of the leading scientists, not only in England but
abroad—with De la Rive, Liebig, Humboldt, etc. His work, however,
cannot be particularised, neither can the many honours that year after year

were awarded to him. We find that he was a man nearly sixty years of age,
in the front rank of the great chemists of his country, and acknowledged as
such on every hand, and yet we find that he was still the same energetic and
enthusiastic scientist, the same kindly and unselfish friend, the same honest
and disinterested man that we have seen him all through. Such, indeed, he
continued until the very last, his character but "deepening"—as he said of
his love for his wife—as the years passed by. His chivalrous deference to
women of all ages and ranks was also a remarkable feature of his character,
no less at this later part of his life, than when he was a younger man; his
chivalry has, indeed, been often referred to, but it was, I learn from Miss
Barnard, one of his most readily observed good qualities.

CHAPTER VII.
Overwork—The End.

"Have you found your life distasteful?
My life did, and does, smack sweet.
Was your youth of pleasure wasteful?
Mine I saved, and hold complete.

Do your joys with age diminish?
When mine fail me I'll complain.
Must in death your daylight finish?
My sun sets to rise again."
Robert Browning.

The year of the Great Exhibition was a busy one for Faraday; he was
working in his old accustomed, unremitting manner at his magnetic, and
electric, and general experiments, he was continuing to write those
Experimental Researches which he sent in to the Royal Society, and upon
which rests so large a part of his reputation as a scientist. He had given up
his professorship at Woolwich Academy the previous year. He was
lecturing, however, a good deal, and not alone on his own account, for
during the summer he delivered a lecture on ozone for his good friend
Professor Schönbein. His health, however, was far from being as good as it
had been, and he had to take frequent rests; so that, although he was
working as earnestly and enthusiastically as ever, it was, so to speak, only
intermittently. That the loss of memory from which he had before suffered
was still afflicting him at times, is made evident by such passages from his
letters as the following pathetic one from a letter to Schönbein: "I have no
doubt I answer your letters very badly; but, my dear friend, do you
remember that I forget, and that I can no more help it than a sieve can help
the water running out of it. Still you know me to be your old and obliged
and affectionate friend, and all I can say is, the longer I know you the more
I seem to cling to you. Ever, my dear Schönbein, yours affectionately."

A pathetic interest attaches to the following reminiscence of Faraday by his
niece (Miss Jane Barnard); she was reading to him an anecdote of the Duke
of Marlborough's intimation to the king that as he felt that the time when his
faculties would fade had arrived he did not wish again to attend any Council
meeting, and that if he should attend he desired that no heed should be
given to anything he said. Faraday after listening attentively to it, asked
Miss Barnard to read that anecdote to him if at any time she felt that his
judgment no longer controlled his wishes.
So numerous were the honours which were showered upon Michael
Faraday during the last forty years of his life, that to enumerate them would
be as tedious as it would be profitless; suffice it to say that he was elected a
member of all the chief scientific and philosophical bodies in Europe.
Indeed it is said that a Continental Professor addressed a letter to him as
"Professor Michael Faraday, Member of all the learned Societies of
Europe." It is worthy of note, however, that he was elected a member of the
Senate of the University of London, and was asked to act as examiner for
the same body, but declined.
During the periods of rest which his failing health made necessary, Faraday
would go off to Brighton or Hastings with his wife, where he would spend a
few days in quiet idleness. In February, 1851, he was at Brighton, where
Mr. Masquerier, the French refugee who had in early life given him lessons
in geometry, was living. In Crabb Robinson's diary the following entry,
which is of much interest to us here, occurs against February 18: "(At
Masquerier's, Brighton.) We had calls soon after breakfast. The one to be
mentioned was that of Faraday, one of the most remarkable men of the day,
the very greatest of our discoverers in chemistry, a perfect lecturer in the
unaffected simplicity and intelligent clearness in his statement; so that the
learned are instructed and the ignorant charmed. His personal character is
admirable. When he was young, poor, and altogether unknown, Masquerier
was kind to him; and now that he is a great man he does not forget his old
friend."
An interesting story is told by Dr. Scoffern of an incident that happened
during this year; an incident that illustrates in a remarkable manner the
unaltered good humour and geniality which belonged to Faraday as much
during his later as his earlier years. Professor Brande was lecturing at the
time on a newly-discovered method of purifying sugar by sugar of lead;

while they were in the laboratory Scoffern accidentally let fall a retort of
corrosive liquid. In an instant, he tells us, Professor Faraday "threw some
soda upon the floor; then down on his hands and knees he went, slop cloth
in hand, like any humble housemaid. Laughing, I expressed my desire to
photograph him then and there; he demurred to the pose, begged me to
consult his dignity, and began laughing with a childish joyousness.
Hilariously boyish upon occasion he could be, and those who knew him
best, knew he was never more at home, that he never seemed so pleased as
when making an 'old boy' of himself, as he was wont to say, lecturing
before a juvenile audience at Christmas."
Faraday, as has been said earlier, attended some of the annual meetings of
the British Association; in this year of 1851 the meeting was held at
Ipswich, and on that occasion Dr. J. H. Gladstone says he first met Faraday
to have any intercourse with him. "I watched him," he writes, "with all the
interest of an admiring disciple, and there is deeply engraven on my
memory the vivacity of his conversation, the eagerness with which he
entered into some mathematico-chemical speculations of Dumas, and the
playfulness with which, when we were dining together, he cut boomerangs
out of card, and shot them across the table at his friends."
Yet another story of Faraday's remarkable disinterestedness is given us by
Dr. Scoffern, who, writing of the year 1852, says that he had made an
abstract of a course of lectures which Faraday had delivered on the subject
of the non-metallic elements; this abstract he wished to embody in a book
which he was about to publish. The kindly old chemist at once gave his
permission, and would not even listen to any proposal as to sharing the
profits of the work. Scoffern immediately suggested that he would be
misunderstood by the publisher, who would not be able to comprehend such
a piece of generosity on the great professor's part. "Oh," said Faraday, "we'll
soon settle that by writing;" and he wrote out a formal letter of assignment.
Despite the fact that his time was always fully occupied, Faraday found
time to write many letters, not only the long friendly, yet scientific letters to
such men as De la Rive and Schönbein, but letters of advice and sympathy
to his nephews and nieces, and other friends. His advice was always given
in so kindly a spirit that it could not be taken amiss, and his sympathy was
tendered in that rare manner—sincere and unostentatious—which
characterises this feeling in its highest manifestation. The following

passage, from a letter to his nephew, Frank Barnard, who was just starting
life, is an illustration of this: "And so you are hard at work, and somewhat
embarrassed by your position; but no man can do just as he likes, and in
many things he has to give way, and may do so honourably, provided he
preserves his self-respect. Never, my dear Frank, lose that, whatever may be
the alternative. Let no one tempt you to it, for nothing can be expedient that
is not right; and though some of your companions may tease you at first,
they will respect you for your consistency in the end; and if they pretend
not to do so it is of no consequence. However, I trust the hardest part of
your probation is over, for the earliest is usually the hardest, and that you
know how to take all things quietly."
Although I have made but little special reference to the work on which our
great hero was engaged when treating of different periods of his life; it
becomes necessary here to refer to the part which Faraday took in exposing
a popular delusion which was widely believed in at the time, and which yet
has many supporters—the delusion as to table-turning. He wrote a long
account fully exposing the error which so many people were willing to
believe; and although his exposure convinced most persons who troubled
themselves to follow him in his investigations, the popular mind refused to
be disillusionised, and the turning of the tables was referred to electricity,
magnetism, spirits, a new natural force, and other agencies. This occasion
perhaps drew more emphatic utterance from Faraday than any other; he had
no patience with people who would not be enlightened, and his feeling is
shown in a letter written in July, 1853, to Professor Schönbein: "I have not
been at work except in turning the tables upon the table-turners, nor should
I have done that, but that so many inquiries poured in upon me, that I
thought it better to stop the inpouring flood by letting all know at once what
my views and thoughts were. What a weak, credulous, incredulous,
unbelieving, superstitious, bold, frightened,—what a ridiculous world ours
is, as far as concerns the mind of man. How full of inconsistencies,
contradictions, and absurdities it is. I declare that, taking the average of
many minds that have recently come before me (and apart from that spirit
which God has placed in each), and accepting for a moment that average as
a standard, I should far prefer the obedience, affections, and instincts of a
dog before it. Do not whisper this, however, to others. There is One above
who worketh in all things, and who governs even in the midst of that
misrule to which the tendencies and powers of men are so easily perverted."

In his Juvenile Lectures, delivered at Christmas of the same year, he again
referred to this popular error, giving at the same time some sound advice to
his young friends. "In conclusion, I must address a few words to the
intending philosophers who form the juvenile part of my audience. Study
science with earnestness—search into nature—elicit the truth—reason on it,
and reject all which will not stand the closest investigation. Keep your
imagination within bounds, taking heed lest it run away with your
judgment. Above all, let me warn you young ones of the danger of being led
away by the superstitions which at this day of boasted progress are a
disgrace to the age, and which afford astonishing proofs of the vast floods
of ignorance overflowing and desolating the highest places.
"Educated man, misusing the glorious gift of reason which raises him above
the brute, actually lowers himself below the creatures endowed only with
instinct; inasmuch as he casts aside the natural sense which might guide
him, and in his credulous folly pretends to discover and investigate
phenomena which reason would not for a moment allow, and which, in fact,
are utterly absurd.
"Let my young hearers mark and remember my words. I desire that they
should dwell in their memory as a protest uttered in this Institution against
the progress of error. Whatever be the encouragement it may receive
elsewhere, may we, at any rate in this place, raise a bulwark which shall
protect the boundaries of truth, and preserve them uninjured during the
rapid encroachments of gross ignorance under the mask of scientific
knowledge."
Faraday's high position in the world of science and his well-known
thoroughness in investigating any subject in which he interested himself,
made his utterances on the subject of spirit-rapping and table-turning
convincing to a large number of people. He was, however, for many years
occasionally pestered with questions about it, by persons who thought they
could prove to him that he was wrong; perhaps in no matter did Faraday so
nearly lose his patience as over this; at no other time did he so nearly
exhibit that volcano of fiery passion which, according to Tyndall, underlay
the sweetness and gentleness of disposition which were his ever-obvious
qualities. He had, as Tyndall well puts it, "through high self-discipline
converted the fire into a central glow and motive power of life, instead of
permitting it to waste itself in useless passion. 'He that is slow to anger,'

saith the sage, 'is greater than the mighty, and he that ruleth his own spirit
than he that taketh a city!' Faraday was not slow to anger, but he completely
ruled his own spirit; and thus, though he took no cities, he captivated all
hearts."
Miss Barnard, from her long and intimate acquaintance with her uncle,
quite endorses what Professor Tyndall says. She says that a most fiery
passion was kept under by the most perfect master, and during all the years
she knew him she could not recollect above two occasions when Faraday,
even for a moment, let his passion get the better of him.
Lightly as he looked upon honours such as are the ones usually appreciated
by more worldly men, Faraday was always well-pleased and more than
gratified when recognised by leading men of science or literature. Many as
were the distinctions which had been and were still being heaped upon him,
he would especially value such a one as was offered him in 1854, when one
who in a measure had been his pupil—Henry Mayhew—dedicated to him a
volume on the Wonders of Science, illustrating the life and progress in
scientific knowledge of young Humphry Davy. This dedication runs, "My
dear sir, I inscribe your name on one of the fly-leaves of this little book,
with the same devotion as youths are wont to carve upon the trunk of some
forest tree the name of those whom they admire most in the world; and I do
so for many reasons." And in concluding the dedication he shows us once
more the helpfulness and goodness of Faraday's nature: "And now, my dear
sir, let me, in conclusion, thank you for your generous encouragement of
my labours when I was engaged in inquiring into the condition of the
'London Poor.' Many know your wisdom, but none are better acquainted
with your goodness than yours very truly,
"Henry Mayhew."
Never, when a success beyond the wildest imaginings of his youth had
crowned his devotion to science, did Faraday forget the time of his early
struggles, and the humble beginning which he had made. As we have before
mentioned, he would frequently stop in the street to speak a kindly word of
encouragement to young newspaper lads who were just starting in life in the
way that he had done over half a century earlier. An incident such as that
depicted in the illustration was, indeed, a not uncommon one, for, to refer

again to the Professor's own words, he could not but feel a tenderness for
such boys, because he had once carried newspapers himself.

FARADAY AND THE NEWSBOY.
In Miss Reid's recollections of her illustrious uncle, from which we have
quoted in an earlier chapter, there was something said about the reading
which interested the scientist in his hours of relaxation. This is always an
interesting matter in connection with our great men; we are always glad to
know what they read, and, if possible, why they read it. At a party about this

time, Faraday joined in a discussion which was being carried on on the
subject of novel reading, and some one of those present took a few notes of
such works as he mentioned as being specially interesting or entertaining to
him. He liked novels, he said, with some stir and life in them, such as Paul
Ferrol, Jane Eyre, too—although of this he characteristically said, "there's a
touch of mesmerism and mystery at the end which would be better away."
Of Scott's novels he was always a great admirer, liking particularly Ivanhoe,
Guy Mannering, and Waverley; he also spoke admiringly of Fanny Burney's
novel, Evelina, a book that is hardly among the generally read novels of to-
day. Writing in 1858 to Professor de la Rive on the death of Mrs. Marcet,[9]
Faraday mentions his early reading as follows: "Do not suppose that I was a
very deep thinker, or was marked as a precocious person, I could believe in
the Arabian Nights as easily as in the Encyclopædia. But facts were
important to me and saved me. I could trust a fact, and always cross-
examined an assertion. So when I questioned Mrs. Marcet's book by such
little experiments as I could find means to perform, and found it true to the
facts as I could understand them, I felt that I had got hold of an anchor in
chemical knowledge, and clung fast to it. Thence my deep veneration for
Mrs. Marcet."
When, in 1857, Mr. Cyrus Field was in England preparing for the laying of
the great telegraph cable across the Atlantic Ocean, he inquired of Faraday
as to what he thought of its practicability; the philosopher doubted the
possibility of transmitting a message. Field saw that an objection from so
great an authority would prove well-nigh fatal, and that it must be removed
at once; he therefore offered to pay Faraday sufficiently for his services if
he would undertake such experiments as were necessary. Faraday declined
the money, but undertook the experiments, and on their completion reported
to Field, "It can be done, but you will not get an instantaneous message."
"How long will it take?" anxiously inquired the engineer.
"Oh, perhaps a second."
"Well, that's quick enough for me."
The year 1858 is an interesting one in the life of Michael Faraday; for over
forty years he had lived in the Royal Institution, and during that time had
risen from being a journeyman bookbinder with a small circle of friends, to
being the first of living philosophers, with a fame known all over the world,

and with friends wherever his fame had penetrated. In this year, however,
while still retaining his connection with the Royal Institution, he removed
with his wife to a house at Hampton Court, which had been kindly placed at
their disposal by Her Majesty the Queen, at the instigation of the Prince
Consort. Faraday writes in April to Prince Albert's secretary acknowledging
the extreme kindness of Her Majesty, but expressing himself as doubtful
whether to accept or to decline. The house it appeared wanted some repairs
which Faraday felt doubtful about; he did not feel that he would be enabled
to undertake them, but his mind was soon set at rest on this score, for in the
summer of this year, writing to one of his nieces, he says, "The case is
settled. The Queen has desired me to dismiss all thoughts of the repairs, as
the house is to be put into thorough repair both inside and out. The letter
from Sir C. Phipps is most kind." In writing to Sir C. Phipps himself
Faraday said, "I find it difficult to write my thanks or express my sense of
the gratitude I owe to Her Majesty; first, for the extreme kindness which is
offered to me in the use of the house at Hampton Court, but far more for
that condescension and consideration which, in respect of personal rest and
health, was the moving cause of the offer. I feared that I might not be able
properly to accept Her Majesty's most gracious favour. I would not bring
myself to decline so honourable an offer, and yet I was constrained
carefully to consider whether its acceptance was consistent with my own
particular and peculiar circumstances. The enlargement of Her Majesty's
favour has removed all difficulty. I accept with deep gratitude, and I hope
that you will help me to express fitly to Her Majesty my thanks and feelings
on this occasion."

FARADAY'S HOUSE, HAMPTON COURT GREEN.
Faraday's house, standing pleasantly on Hampton Court Green, was, as will
be seen from the illustration, a delightful creeper-embowered place, and
with its open aspect and surrounding greenery, must have afforded a great
and agreeable change to the tired philosopher and his wife. For some years
after his removal Faraday made frequent runs up to town to the Institution,
where he continued his research work and also delivered many lectures,
notably, several courses of the now annual Juvenile Lectures. He was,
however, not able to continue for long spells of work, but had to take
occasional intervals of rest. He still made frequent reports in connection
with Trinity House, but refused to take up any further work. He declined
even to prepare his Juvenile Lectures for publication, although other

reasons than his own incapacity for sustained work here influenced him, as
we see by the following letter:—

"Royal Institution, January 3, 1859.
"Dear Sir,—Many thanks both to you and Mr. Bentley. Mr. Murray
made me an unlimited offer like that of Mr. Bentley's many years ago,
but for the reasons I am about to give you I had to refuse his kindness.
He proposed to take them by shorthand, and so save me trouble, but I
knew that would be a thorough failure; even if I cared to give time to
the revision of the MS., still the lectures without the experiments and
the vivacity of speaking would fall far behind those in the lecture room
as to effect. And then I do not desire to give time to them, for money is
no temptation to me. In fact, I have always loved science more than
money; and because my occupation is almost entirely personal, I
cannot afford to get rich.
"Again thanking you and Mr. Bentley,
"I remain, very truly yours,
"M. Faraday."

I have had to insist once or twice upon Faraday's deeply religious nature; it
comes out very clearly in some letters written about this time, when he was
an old man—having very nearly attained to the threescore years and ten of
man's life. In his work and in his conversation he never obtruded his
religious convictions, but the innate religious feeling of the man coloured
his every relation with his fellow men. In that we have but few direct
writings of his on this subject, a grave interest attaches to the following
letter to his niece: "I never heard of the saying that separation is the brother
of death; I think that it does death an injustice, at least in the mind of the
Christian; separation simply implies no re-union; death has to the Christian
everything hoped for contained in the idea of re-union. I cannot think that
death has to the Christian anything in it that should make it a rare, or other
than a constant thought; out of the view of death comes the view of the life
beyond the grave, as out of the view of sin (that true and real view which
the Holy Spirit alone can give to a man) comes the glorious hope; without
the conviction of sin there is no ground of hope to the Christian. As far as
he is permitted for the trial of his faith to forget the conviction of sin, he

forgets his hope, he forgets the need of Him who became sin or a sin-
offering for His people, and overcame death by dying. And though death be
repugnant to the flesh, yet where the Spirit is given, to die is gain. What a
wonderful transition it is! for, as the apostle says, even whilst having the
firstfruits of the Spirit, the people of God groan within themselves, 'waiting
for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of the body.' Elsewhere he says, that
whilst in the earthly house of this tabernacle we groan, earnestly desiring to
be clothed upon with our house which is from heaven.
"It is permitted to the Christian to think of death; he is even represented as
praying that God would teach him to number his days. Words are given to
him, 'O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?' and the
answer is given him, 'Thanks be to God, who giveth us the victory through
our Lord Jesus Christ.' And though the thought of death brings the thought
of judgment, which is far above all the trouble that arises from the breaking
of mere earthly ties, it also brings to the Christian the thought of Him who
died, was judged, and who rose again for the justification of those who
believe in Him. Though the fear of death be a great thought, the hope of
eternal life is a far greater.... You see I chat now and then with you as if my
thoughts were running openly before us on the paper, and so it is. My
worldly faculties are slipping away day by day. Happy is it for all of us that
the true good lies not in them. As they ebb, may they leave us as little
children, trusting in the Father of mercies and accepting His unspeakable
gift."
In 1860 Faraday became once more an elder in the Sandemanian Church,
and retained that office for nearly four years, when he finally resigned it.
The meeting of the British Association was held in this year at Oxford, and
Faraday was once more present, as he liked to be, at this scientific
gathering. A friend, apropos of this visit, wrote the following jeu d'esprit,
which is worth remembering—

"'That P will change to F in the British tongue is true
(Quoth Professor Phillips), though the instances are few.'
An entry in my journal then I ventured thus to parody,
'I this day dined with Fillips, where I hobbed and nobbed with Pharaday.'"

FARADAY DELIVERING HIS CHRISTMAS JUVENILE
LECTURES.
This same year is also notable as being the nineteenth, and last, in which
Faraday delivered the Christmas Juvenile Lectures; for ten years in
succession he had given them, the four lectures of this, his final course,
being those well known and generally appreciated ones upon "The
Chemical History of a Candle." An earlier course having been given some
years before on the same subject. His failing health and memory made it
necessary for him to discontinue much of his work, and in the following
year his last experimental work was done, and (on June 20) his last Friday
evening lecture delivered. A touching and pathetic interest attaches to the
slight notes which he made for this, his last lecture. The notes are brief—
but yet how much is there not expressed in them?
"Personal explanation—years of happiness here, but time of retirement;
LOSS OF MEMORY and physical endurance of the brain.
"1. Causes—hesitation and uncertainty of the convictions which the
speaker has to urge.

"2. Inability to draw upon the mind for the treasures of knowledge it has
previously received.
"3. Dimness, and forgetfulness of one's former self-standard in respect of
right, dignity, and self-respect.
"4. Strong duty of doing justice to others, yet inability to do so.
"Retire."
Thus did the old man of seventy years touchingly bid farewell to work
which he had been carrying on for the greater part of half a century—to that
work which had received from him the untiring devotion of a life-time. In
1862 his memory, which had previously troubled him, became even less
trustworthy; though his cheerfulness, faith, and innate optimism were never
clouded for a moment, as is well-shown in a letter which he wrote to the
wife of his old friend Barlow. "I called at your house," Faraday wrote, "and
I rejoice to think that your absence is a sign of good health. Our love to you
both. I am enjoying the gradual decay of strength and life, for when I revive
it is no great revival or desire to me, and that cheers me in the view of death
near and round us."
In 1863 his chief work was in connection with the Trinity House, Faraday
continuing to report upon the value of the magneto-electric light for
lighthouses, and visiting yet again, as he had frequently done for years past,
Dungeness and other stations for the purpose. Despite his incapacity for
sustained mental work owing to his failing memory, Faraday continued
fairly hale in body, and was yet active, for in February of 1863 he was at
Dungeness, and in the autumn of the same year he was in Scotland for a
fortnight, and wrote from Glasgow to one who for over forty years had been
his loving companion, a letter breathing an affection unaltered by the lapse
of years, unless indeed it were, to use his own expression, that it had grown
deeper. We have seen the letters which he wrote in the early years of his
marriage; it is fitting that we should quote from this one to show how
unchanged he was, despite the many years which had passed over him. "I
long to see you, dearest," he wrote, "and to talk over things together, and
call to mind all the kindness I have received. My head is full and my heart
also, but my recollection rapidly fails, even as regards the friends that are in
the room with me. You will have to resume your old function of being a
pillow to my mind, and a rest, a happy-making wife.... Dearest, I long to see

and be with you. Whether together or separate, your husband, very
affectionate,
"M. Faraday."
In 1865 he felt compelled to relinquish the active work in connection with
the Trinity House, without altogether retiring from his position, for after
thirty years' work, during which he had been treated by the Brethren with
uniform kindness and consideration, he did not like to altogether sever his
connection with friends with whom he had been so long and so
harmoniously working. In accordance with Faraday's wishes Professor
Tyndall undertook this work for him. In the same year he felt it necessary to
communicate with the managers of the Royal Institution, expressing his
desire to be allowed, without severing his connection with it, to give up his
active work for the Institution.
The last two years of his life were thus passed "waiting" as he once or twice
expressed it. To an old friend of very many years' standing he had said,
"Barlow, you and I are waiting—that is what we have to do now; and we
must try to do it patiently." And again, in reply to a friend who inquired as
to how he was, he simply replied, "Just waiting." Thus gradually and
quietly the end approached. One of his nieces writes of her annual visit in
1867:
"I spent June at Hampton Court. Dear uncle kept up rather better than
sometimes; but oh! there was always pain in seeing afresh how far the mind
had faded away. Still the sweet unselfish disposition was there, winning the
love of all around him....
"I shall never look at the lightning flashes without recalling his delight in a
beautiful storm. How he would stand at the window for hours, watching the
effects and enjoying the scene; while we knew his mind was full of lofty
thoughts; sometimes of the great Creator, and sometimes of the laws by
which He sees meet to govern the earth.
"I shall also always connect the sight of the hues of a brilliant sunset with
him, and especially he will be present to my mind while I watch the fading
of the tints into the sombre grey of night. He loved to have us with him, as
he stood or sauntered on some open spot, and spoke his thoughts, perhaps in
the words of Gray's Elegy, which he retained in memory, clearly, long after

many other things had faded quite away. Then, as darkness stole on, his
companions would gradually turn indoors, while he was well pleased to be
left to solitary communings with his own thoughts."

FARADAY'S TOMB AT HIGHGATE.
On the 25th of August, 1867, he passed quietly away, dying in his chair in
his study at Hampton Court. His niece, Miss Barnard, from whose
recollections we have learned much in earlier chapters, had spent a good
part of her life with her aunt and uncle, and had helped to nurse the latter
during the last few months. "My occupation has gone," she pathetically
wrote to Dr. Bence Jones. On August 30th, the funeral took place,
everything being conducted simply and quietly; it was, as Faraday had
himself expressed a desire that it should be, strictly private. A plain
headstone in Highgate Cemetery, with the following simple inscription,
marks the place where lies all that was mortal of one of England's noblest
sons.

"Michael Faraday,
Born, 22nd September,
1791,
Died, 25th August,
1867"
If it were necessary to add anything to these simple words that mark his
resting-place, there might be put, and it would apply to Faraday as truly as
to any man that ever lived, the well-known line—
"An honest man, the noblest work of God."

CHAPTER VIII.
As Friend and Lecturer.

"I thought these men will carry hence
Promptings their former life above,
And something of a finer reverence
For beauty, truth, and love."
Lowell.

At various periods of Faraday's life his genial good-nature and kindliness
have been brought home to us in different ways. From that early time when
he used to take care of his little sister Margaret in Manchester Square, up to
the very latest course of Juvenile Lectures which he delivered at the Royal
Institution in 1863, he had always the same love for young people; and, as
is usual with persons of such a disposition, he was ever a great favourite of
the children, whether of those who used to hear his Christmas lectures, or
with those happier ones who met him more intimately. Intimate seems
perhaps a curious word to use with regard to the relations of young children
and an old man; but yet it is the only word that really expresses what is
meant; that really indicates that instant bond of sympathy that seems to
connect children with men and women who possess the power of attracting
and delighting them by becoming from the first as one of themselves. This
quality, this delightful quality, belonged to Michael Faraday in an eminent
degree.
Fortunate indeed were those children who listened to his Christmas
Lectures to Juveniles, and fortunate also were those older people who were
present on the same occasions. Many people who enjoyed the pleasure and
privilege of hearing him at such a time recorded their impressions, and
pleasant reading is the result. Lady Pollock, for instance, wrote: "When he
lectured to children he was careful to be perfectly distinct, and never
allowed his ideas to outrun their intelligence. He took great delight in
talking to them, and easily won their confidence. The vivacity of his manner

and of his countenance, his pleasant laugh, the frankness of his whole
bearing, attracted them to him. They felt as if he belonged to them; and
indeed he sometimes, in his joyous enthusiasm, appeared like an inspired
child. He was not at all a man for evening parties; he was nothing of a
ladies' man; but he was the true man for the juveniles, and would go to see a
domestic charade when the boys acted in it, and suddenly appear behind the
scene to offer a little help or suggest a new arrangement; and then, while he
was in front, he would laugh and applaud so loudly, that his presence was
the best encouragement which the young performers could have. Or he
would help the young people to wonder at the feats of a conjuror, or he
would join in a round game, and romp quite noisily. But all was done with a
natural impulse. There was no assumption of kindness, no air of
condescension."
Another writer, who had the rare privilege of meeting the great man
socially, said: "Nothing indeed pleased him better than to be a boy again,
and to mingle in the sports of the young, especially if they took a turn
congenial at all to his own pursuits. He has been known to join a youthful
party on a November evening to assist in a display of fireworks. There he
might be seen running to and fro in a garden at night, with his pockets
crammed with combustibles—now kindling lycopodium or burning
potassium—then letting off blue fires, green fires, purple fires—sometimes
dropping ignited crackers at the feet of the boys with an air of affected
astonishment, or probably chasing the girls in order to streak their cheeks
with phosphorus."
As a lecturer to children Faraday was indeed particularly successful and
especially interesting. His first course of Christmas Juvenile Lectures was
given in 1827—his last, on "The Chemical History of a Candle," was given
in 1863, and during that time he gave in all nineteen of these courses. The
first consisted of six lectures on chemistry, and the first lecture of the course
was illustrated with no fewer than eighty-six experiments, which were, it is
scarcely necessary to say, carried out on the platform. In his note-book
Faraday made the following entry with regard to this course, "The six
juvenile lectures were just what they ought to have been, both in matter and
manner; but it would not answer to give an extended course in the same
spirit."

One secret of Faraday's success as a lecturer, both to juveniles and others,
was the carefulness with which he always tried to ascertain what was the
best method. In early years he would have a friend (Magrath, or some other)
among the audience, who was to tell him afterwards of any peculiarities,
either of manner or style, that wanted correcting; and Miss Reid tells us that
in the early years of the Juvenile Lectures her uncle used to encourage her
to tell him everything that struck her; and, when she did not fully
understand him, where her difficulties lay. He would then enlarge upon
those points in the next lecture, and thus he made a child's remark serve him
in making things clear to children. He used also, at first, to have a card, on
which was distinctly written the word Slow, before him; and if he forgot it
and became rapid, his assistant Anderson had orders to place it before him.
Sometimes also when his lecture hour was nearly expired, he would arrange
to have a card with the word Time on it, placed within his view.
One of his early courses for children treated of that subject which always
possessed a great fascination for him, and in which he did much of his
greatest work—electricity. The slight notes which he made for the first
lecture of this course are interesting. "An extraordinary power that I have to
explain; not fear boldly entering into its consideration, because I think it
ought to be understood by children—not minutely, but so as to think
reasonably about it, and such effects as children can produce, or observe to
take place in nature—simple instances of its power." This first lecture was
illustrated by eighty experiments.
We have dwelt upon his kindliness and sympathy with children; but, it may
be noted, he had none of his own, though from almost the earliest year of
his married life he always liked to have one or other of his nieces with him.
His love for children is well shown in an anecdote which Dr. Gladstone tells
of his later life. He was at a soirée at the house of Mr. Justice Grove; the
eldest daughter having heard him express himself disappointed at being too
late to see any of the younger members of the family, brought down the
little ones in their nightgowns to the foot of the stairs, when Faraday
showed how gratified he was by saying to her, "Ah! that's the best thing
you've done to-night."
Sometimes he would indulge in some slight practical jokes with the young
people. For instance, a nephew visiting him in his study one morning,
Faraday said to him, "Why, Frank, what a tall boy you are growing; you can

almost touch that brass ball—just try." Nothing loth, the boy standing on
tiptoe reached up and touched the ball with his fingers, when his playful
uncle gave a turn to a wheel and the boy received a slight shock, and with it
a first, and somewhat unexpected, lesson on the nature of electricity.

FARADAY LECTURING BEFORE THE PRINCE CONSORT,
PRINCE OF WALES AND DUKE OF EDINBURGH.
Reduction of the picture painted] [in 1856 by Alexander Blaikley.
The Prince Consort was a constant patron of the Royal Institution, and the
young princes also were present at many of the Juvenile Lectures. After
attending such a course H.R.H. the Prince of Wales, then a lad of fifteen,
and his brother, H.R.H. Prince Alfred, Duke of Edinburgh, wrote from
Windsor Castle the following letters to Professor Faraday:—

"Dear Sir,—I am anxious to thank you for the advantage I have
derived from attending your most interesting lectures. Their subject, I
know very well, is of great importance, and I hope to follow the advice
you gave us of pursuing it beyond the lecture-room; and I can assure
you that I shall always cherish with great pleasure the recollection of
having been assisted in my early studies in chemistry by so
distinguished a man.

"Believe me, dear Sir, yours truly,
"Albert Edward."

Prince Alfred's letter was as follows:—

"Dear Sir,—I write to thank you very much for the pleasure you have
given me by your lectures, and I cannot help hoping they will not be
the last I shall hear from you. Their subject was very interesting, and
your clear explanations made it doubly so.
"Believe me, dear Sir, yours truly,
"Alfred."

It is interesting to learn Faraday's own views with regard to popular
lectures, for never yet was there a truly scientific lecturer who was more
truly popular; perhaps, indeed, there is no other single man who, without in
any degree lowering his work for the purpose, succeeded so well in
popularising scientific knowledge. These are his own words on the subject:
"As to popular lectures (which at the same time are to be respectable and
sound) none are more difficult to find. Lectures which really teach will
never be popular; lectures which are popular will never really teach." His
own success as a lecturer was owing largely to the power he had of adapting
himself to all minds, from the deepest thinkers to the liveliest youth; this
power gave him a "wide range of influence, and his sympathy with the
young among his listeners imparted more life and colour to his discourses
than they might otherwise have possessed. He had the art of making
philosophy charming, and this was due in no little measure to the fact that
to grey-headed wisdom, he united wonderful juvenility of spirit."
"He was," to quote once more from Lady Pollock's recollections of the
illustrious lecturer, "completely master of the situation; he had his audience
at his command, as he had himself and all his belongings; he had nothing to
fret him, and he could give his eloquence full sway. It was an irresistible
eloquence, which compelled attention and insisted upon sympathy. It waked
the young from their visions and the old from their dreams. There was a
gleaming in his eye which no painter could copy, and which no poet could
describe.... His enthusiasm sometimes carried him to the point of ecstasy
when he expatiated on the beauty of nature, and when he lifted the veil from

her deep mysteries. His body then took motion from his mind; his hair
streamed out from his head, his hands were full of nervous action, his light,
lithe body seemed to quiver with its eager life. His audience took fire with
him, and every face was flushed.... A pleasant vein of humour accompanied
his ardent imagination, and occasionally, not too often, relieved the tension
of thought imposed upon his pupils. He would play with his subject now
and then, but very delicately; his sport was only just enough to enliven the
effort of attention. He never suffered an experiment to allure him away from
his theme. Every touch of his hand was a true illustration of his argument."
As he once remarked in giving advice to a young lecturer: "If I said to my
audience, 'This stone will fall to the ground if I open my hand,' I should
open my hand and let it fall. Take nothing for granted as known; inform the
eye at the same time as you address the ear."
It is of interest here—after seeing how Faraday as a lecturer impressed
others—to note some of the remarks which he made on the subject of
lectures, lecturers, and lecturing in his early correspondence with his friend,
Benjamin Abbott. Several long letters on this matter passed between the
friends, and Faraday (he was twenty-one at the time) not only speaks in a
discriminating manner with regard to lectures, but he also treats with his
native good sense of lecture rooms, apparatus, etc. All his remarks, he says
in his earliest letter to Abbott on the subject, are the result of his own
personal observation. The most necessary quality for a lecturer, says the
youthful Faraday, is a good delivery; he then dwells upon the necessity of
illustrating a lecture with experiments wherever possible. (How well he
carried this rule into practice has been seen in an earlier part of this chapter,
where we learned of some of his Juvenile Lectures being illustrated by
upwards of eighty experiments.) "A lecturer," he goes on to say, "should
appear easy and collected, undaunted and unconcerned,[10] his thoughts
about him, and his mind clear and free for the contemplation and
description of his subject." He then says, and we instantly think of the
"time" card he had placed before him later, "I disapprove of long lectures;
one hour is long enough for anyone, nor should they be allowed to exceed
that time."
The last of this series of letters on lectures commences in a style of genial
banter, which, as it illustrates the lighter side of Faraday's character, merits
quotation. "Dear Abbott," he writes, "As when on some secluded branch in

forest far and wide sits perched an owl, who, full of self-conceit and self-
created wisdom, explains, comments, condemns, ordains, and orders things
not understood, yet full of his importance still holds forth to stocks and
stones around—so sits and scribbles Mike; so he declaims to walls, stones,
tables, chairs, hats, books, pens, shoes, and all the things inert that be
around him, and so he will to the end of the chapter."
This playful mood comes out, also, in one or two anecdotes which are told
of him, when his fame was established. For instance, an old lady friend
being much troubled by some rancid butter, thought that she had hit upon a
method of improving it, which she did by mixing with it a quantity of soda,
she having a somewhat high opinion of the purifying virtues of that alkali,
although, it is to be presumed, she little suspected the uses to which it was
applied in the manufactures. By this addition of soda, she triumphantly
claimed that her butter "was greatly improved." One evening, when
Professor Faraday called upon her, the old lady produced a sample of her
"improved" butter. A merry laugh rang out from the philosopher's lips as he
exclaimed, "Well done, Mrs. W., you have improved your bad butter into
very indifferent soap!"
Good-humoured and good-natured as Faraday habitually was, he did not
like to be worried unnecessarily over unimportant matters; and willing as he
was to place even his invaluable time at the disposal of almost anyone who
claimed his attention, he had no patience with persons who came to him
thoughtlessly, as the following story shows: A young man called on him one
morning, and with an air of great importance confided to him the result of
some original researches in electrical philosophy. "And pray," asked the
professor, taking down a volume of Ree's Cyclopœdia, "did you consult
this, or any elementary work, to learn whether your discovery had been
anticipated?" The young man replied in the negative. "Then why do you
come to waste my time about well-known facts that were published forty
years ago?" "Sir," said the visitor in self-excuse, and hoping to flatter the
philosopher, "I thought I had better bring the matter to headquarters
immediately." "All very well for you, but not so well for headquarters,"
replied the professor sharply, and he forthwith set his visitor to read the
article in the Cyclopœdia.
Yet another story is told of a grave old gentleman who once waited upon
Faraday that he might show to him "a new law of physics." The gentleman

asked for a jug of water and a tumbler; they were brought, and he then
produced a cork. "You will be pleased to observe," he then said, "how
persistently this cork clings to the side of the glass when the vessel is half-
filled."
"Just so," replied the professor.
"But now," continued the discoverer of a new law of physics, "mark what
happens when I fill the glass to the brim. There! you see the cork flies to the
centre—positively repelled by the sides!"
"Precisely so," answered Faraday in an amused tone, which showed that the
"new law" was more familiar to him than to his visitor, who, somewhat
abashed, said, "Pray, how long have you known this?" "Oh, ever since I was
a boy," was the reply; but the innate kindliness of his nature must show
itself even in such a case, for, seeing the old gentleman's disappointed look,
he added that he was not to be grieved, he might possibly some day alight
upon something really new.
The last course of Faraday's Juvenile Lectures—on "The Chemical History
of a Candle"—has been referred to once or twice. These lectures are indeed
of very great interest, not only in themselves as chemical illustrations, but
as being part of Professor Faraday's best known works, and the only
juvenile lectures of his which are obtainable in the form of a book. The way
in which he introduced his subject will show us how simple, and yet how
explicit he was in explaining to his young audience the phenomena which
he brought before them.
"I purpose," he said, to quote the beginning of the initial lecture of the series
of six, "in return for the honour you do us by coming to see what are our
proceedings here, to bring before you in the course of these lectures, the
chemical history of a candle. I have taken this subject on a former occasion,
and were it left to my own will, I should prefer to repeat it almost every
year—so abundant is the interest that attaches itself to the subject, so
wonderful are the varieties of outlet which it offers into the various
departments of philosophy. There is not a law under which any part of this
universe is governed which does not come into play, and is touched upon in
these phenomena. There is no better, there is no more open door by which
you can enter into the study of natural philosophy, than by considering the
physical phenomena of a candle. I trust, therefore, I shall not disappoint you

in choosing this for my subject rather than any newer topic, which could not
be better, were it even so good.
"And before proceeding, let me say this also—that though our subject be so
great, and our intention that of treating it honestly, seriously, and
philosophically, yet I mean to pass away from all those who are seniors
amongst us. I claim the privilege of speaking to juveniles as a juvenile
myself. I have done so on former occasions—and, if you please, I shall do
so again. And though I stand here with the knowledge of having the words I
utter given to the world, yet that shall not deter me from speaking in the
same familiar way to those whom I esteem nearest to me on this occasion.
"And now, my boys and girls, I must first tell you of what candles are made.
Some are great curiosities. I have here some bits of timber, branches of trees
particularly famous for their burning. And here you see a piece of that very
curious substance taken out of some of the bogs in Ireland, called
candlewood—a hard, strong, excellent wood, evidently fitted for good work
as a resister of force, and yet withal burning so well that where it is found
they make splinters of it, and torches, since it burns like a candle, and gives
a very good light indeed. And in this wood we have one of the most
beautiful illustrations of the general nature of a candle that I can possibly
give. The fuel provided, the means of bringing that fuel to the place of
chemical action, the regular and gradual supply of air to that place of action
—heat and light—all produced by a little piece of wood of this kind,
forming, in fact, a natural candle.
"But we must speak of candles as they are in commerce. Here are a couple
of candles commonly called dips. They are made of lengths of cotton cut
off, hung up by a loop, dipped into melted tallow, taken out again and
cooled, then re-dipped until there is an accumulation of tallow round the
cotton. In order that you may have an idea of the various characters of these
candles, you see these which I hold in my hand—they are very small and
very curious. They are, or were, the candles used by miners in coal mines.
In olden times the miner had to find his own candles; and it was supposed
that a small candle would not so soon set fire to the fire-damp in the coal
mines as a larger one; and for that reason, as well as for economy's sake, he
made candles of this sort—twenty, thirty, forty, or sixty to the pound. They
have been replaced since then by the steel-mill, and then by the Davy lamp,
and other safety lamps of various kinds. I have here a candle that was taken

out of the Royal George, it is said, by Colonel Pasley. It has been sunk in
the sea for many years, subject to the action of salt water. It shows you how
well candles may be preserved; for though it is cracked about and broken a
good deal, yet, when lighted, it goes on burning regularly, and the tallow
resumes its natural condition as soon as it is fused."
We have not space to quote further from these delightful lectures, which
however, as I have said earlier, can be got in a little volume by themselves.
These lectures were, as indeed were most of Faraday's lectures, beautifully
illustrated with a large number of experiments.
On one occasion, when suffering much in health, Faraday yet insisted upon
taking his place at the lecture table at the Royal Institution; for an
obstruction of voice, which was indeed too painfully apparent, he
apologised, saying that "in an engagement where the contracting parties
were one and many, the one ought not on any slight ground to break his part
of the engagement with the many, and therefore, if the audience would
excuse his imperfect utterance he would proceed." The audience murmured,
and there were cries of "Put off the lecture;" but Faraday begged to be
allowed to go on. A medical man rose and said it would in his opinion be
dangerous for the Professor to proceed. Faraday still urged his desire to go
on with the lecture; he could not give people all the trouble of coming there,
having perhaps put off other engagements, for nothing. On this, as by a
single impulse, the whole audience rose, and Faraday yielded to the
generally expressed desire to spare him the pain and inconvenience of
lecturing. After a fortnight's rest he reappeared, and continued the broken
course, carrying it on later that his audience should not lose any of the eight
lectures which they had anticipated. It was on a reappearance such as this
after illness that "as soon as his presence was recognised, the whole
audience rose simultaneously, and burst into a spontaneous utterance of
welcome, loud and long."

CHAPTER IX.
Notes on His Work.

"So that I draw the breath of finer air
Station is nought, nor footways laurel-strewn,
Nor rivals tightly belted for the race.
God speed to them! My place is here or there;
My pride is that among them I have place:
And thus I keep this instrument in tune."
George Meredith.

In treating of the life-story of Michael Faraday I have let particulars as to
his various experiments and discoveries interfere as little as possible with
the continuity of the narrative, and have thought it advisable to slightly refer
to them in a special chapter. The value of his contributions to our fund of
scientific knowledge is made manifest by the fact that whatever book on
electricity and allied subjects we may take up now—works even bringing
the science down to the very latest date—we always find the name and
experiments of Michael Faraday quoted with great respect as a leader and
an unquestioned authority. Indeed, our debt to him for his electrical work is
incalculable; we are now seeing the electric light carried day by day into
more streets, lighting more public places, nay, even being used in
illuminating private buildings. This light we owe, primarily, to Michael
Faraday. Writing nearly a quarter of a century ago Professor Tyndall
answers this question as to "What is the use of it all?" thus explicitly and
unhesitatingly—"As far as electricity has been applied for medical
purposes, it has been almost exclusively Faraday's electricity. You have
noticed those lines of wire which cross the streets of London. It is Faraday's
currents that speed from place to place through these wires. Approaching
the point of Dungeness the mariner sees an unusually brilliant light, and
from the noble phares of La Hève the same light flashes across the sea.
These are Faraday's sparks exalted by suitable machinery to sunlike
splendour. At the present moment the Board of Trade and the Brethren of

the Trinity House, as well as the Commissioners of Northern Lights, are
contemplating the introduction of the Magneto-electric Light at numerous
points upon our coasts; and future generations will be able to refer to those
guiding stars in answer to the question, What has been the practical use of
the labours of Faraday? But I would again emphatically say that his work
needs no such justification; and that if he had allowed his vision to be
disturbed by considerations regarding the practical use of his discoveries,
those discoveries would never have been made by him."
In one of his very earliest lectures delivered before the City Philosophical
Society on the subject of chlorine,[11] Faraday referred to the question too
often and too thoughtlessly put on hearing of a new discovery. "Before
leaving this subject," he said, "I will point out the history of this substance,
as an answer to those who are in the habit of saying to every new fact,
'What is its use?' Benjamin Franklin says to such, 'What is the use of an
infant?' The answer of the experimentalist is, 'endeavour to make it useful.'"
Truly the infant Electricity has already grown to goodly proportions. It is to
his researches in connection with electrical science that we must look for
the chief result of Faraday's work. His later years were almost exclusively
taken up in the investigation of this fascinating subject.
The value of his contributions to the sum of knowledge on this new branch
of science was testified to in a remarkable manner during the past summer,
when the centenary of his birth was celebrated in a fitting manner at that
Institution which had been a "home" to him for so many years. It was
indeed an unique incident in the history of modern science, when on the
17th of June, 1891, many of the leading living scientists met in the theatre
of the Royal Institution to hear a lecture by Lord Rayleigh on the life-work
of "one of England's greatest worthies." "A quarter of a century has not
elapsed," wrote a contemporary journal,[12] "since his death, and yet we find
the highest nobles of the land vieing with the most illustrious professors of
our own and of foreign universities in testifying their admiration for this
man of the people, who rose to be a leader of scientific men." "When the
history of electricity comes to be written," continues the same authority, "a
chapter of great extent and first importance must be given to the prolific
life-work of Faraday. He will be pointed to as the man who in the middle of
the nineteenth century, waged an energetic and relentless warfare against
the two fluid theories in electricity and magnetism, and who dealt its death-

blow to the theory of action at a distance. And to show the powerful
influence his master-mind exercised over contemporary science, the
historian may merely refer to Clerk-Maxwell, Sir William Thomson,
Rayleigh, Tyndall, and others, all admiring disciples and professed
followers of the great Michael Faraday."
The meeting that thus did honour to the memory of Faraday, was probably
the most fitting method of celebrating the anniversary of his birth that could
have been devised; it was, we may feel sure, just such a celebration as
Faraday would have felt most proud of. Wealth and social rank, as we have
seen throughout his life, had no attraction for him; but he did like to receive
the appreciation of capable men, in whose appreciation he found the highest
honour to which it was possible to attain.
Some of Faraday's earliest experiments, as was incidentally mentioned in an
earlier part of this little book, were in connection with chlorine, etc., and
then on the making of glass for optical purposes; and it was not, indeed,
until he had been at the Institution for about eighteen years that he really
entered with any degree of success into his electrical research. Here it is of
interest to note a remark which he once made in this connection to the effect
that it requires twenty years of work to make a man in physical science, the
whole of the previous period being one of infancy. Once, however, he had
reached this scientific manhood his work was done with remarkable
rapidity; he would, once on the track, so to speak, of a discovery, mature it
in a space of time so short as to be nothing less than marvellous; and one
after another of his "experimental researches" were carried out, completed,
described, and the resultant paper submitted to the Royal Society with a
rapidity, and at the same time with an accuracy which has never been
equalled. He was asked once what was the secret of his success, and
answered that the whole secret might be told in three words, they were
these "Work—Finish—Publish." Perhaps the centre word is the one on
which Faraday would himself have lain most stress—he was always careful
to finish everything before he announced it, which makes his almost
unexceptional accuracy, considering the rapidity with which he worked,
even more remarkable. It is, however, not inaccurate to say that the results
which he definitely announced, were never found to be wrong; further
developments have of course taken place, but the result of a research as

announced by him was never found to be untrue, and has never had to be
put aside.
He had said, in the early part of his scientific career, "the thing that I am
proudest of is that I have never been found to be wrong." And after the
death of his friend, Professor A. de la Rive wrote, "I do not think that
Faraday has once been caught in a mistake; so precise and conscientious
was his mode of experimenting and observing." Dr. Gladstone commenting
upon this says, "The extreme rarity of his mistakes, notwithstanding the
immense amount of his published researches, is one of those marvels which
can be appreciated only by those who are in the habit of describing what
they have seen in the mist-land that lies beyond the boundaries of previous
knowledge."
The proper treatment of Faraday's discoveries could of course only be
undertaken by one who was himself a scientist; the technicalities of the
laboratory and the lecture-theatre would be somewhat out of place in a book
such as this, which but aims at presenting in a popular form the facts in
connection with the life of one of the greatest of England's scientists—one
of the best of her sons. It may, however, here be pointed out that to those
who would become acquainted with the details of Faraday's scientific work,
with particulars of his numerous experiments, a delightful introduction has
been afforded by Professor Tyndall, who in his little work on Faraday as a
Discoverer, has summarised much of the great man's work, and explains in
a clear and delightful manner much about the experiments which were
undertaken and the discoveries which were made by his illustrious
predecessor and friend. It is of interest to notice here what discovery of
Faraday it is which Tyndall selects as the greatest—it is the discovery of
electro-magnetism, of which he says: "The beauty and exactitude of the
results of this investigation are extraordinary. I cannot help thinking while I
dwell upon them, that this discovery of magneto-electricity is the greatest
experimental result ever obtained by an investigator. It is the Mont Blanc of
Faraday's own achievements. He always worked at great elevations, but a
higher than this he never subsequently attained."
The following impromptu lines with reference to Faraday's great discovery
of magneto-electricity were written by Herbert Mayo:—

"Around the magnet Faraday
Was sure that Volta's lightnings play,
But how to draw them from the wire?
He drew a lesson from the heart.—
'Tis when we meet, 'tis when we part,
Breaks forth th' electric fire."

Of this same subject Tyndall wrote shortly after Faraday's death:—"Seven
and thirty years have passed since the discovery of magneto-electricity; but,
if we except the extra current, until quite recently nothing of moment was
added to the subject. Faraday entertained the opinion that the discoverer of
a great law or principle had a right to the 'spoils'—this was his term—
arising from its illustration; and guided by the principle he had discovered,
his wonderful mind, aided by his wonderful ten fingers, overran in a single
autumn this vast domain, and hardly left behind him the shred of a fact to
be gathered by his successors."
This indeed is a quality which has been insisted upon by all who have as
fellow scientists treated of the work which was done by Michael Faraday,—
this quality, that is, of completion, of thoroughness in finishing that which
he had commenced; he seemed to become aware almost as though by
intuition of the full meaning of a discovery, and of its true bearing with
regard to previous knowledge.
Great as was Faraday's work in the service of science he not only did not
aim at, but he frequently declined to accept what many men would have
considered but just reward. He was a chemist, a scientist, a philosopher (to
give him the name which he best liked, and of which he felt most proud),
and did his work as such from the purest love for it, as I have tried to show
in earlier chapters. He did not seek worldly position—he was above it; he
did not seek for wealth, he had no use for it, as his wants were of the
simplest; he did not seek for popular applause, for the suffrage of the
multitude; but what he did all his life long most earnestly and most
faithfully strive for was—Truth. He ever aimed at fulfilling what the
Laureate has beautifully expressed in his dedication to In Memoriam
wherein he says—

"Let knowledge grow from more to more,
And more of reverence in us dwell,
That mind and soul according well
May make one music as before,
But vaster."

He sought to make knowledge grow from more to more, but it is to be
recollected that he never for one more moment swerved from his faithful
adherence to his Church. In all his research among physical phenomena he
was never led to doubt, as some have done, the truth of that religion in
which he always maintained a sincere and beautiful faith; his religion was,
indeed, always a something far above his science, a something sacred and
of moment to himself, as a single soul. We saw in his reply to his wife on
his formally entering the Sandemanian Church shortly after his marriage,
what was his attitude on this question. It was, as he had said, a matter
between himself and his God; and thus we find in what he has written but
very little about his religion, although one or two of his letters to relations,
where he has been directly appealed to, breathe the sincere and earnest
devotion of the man, and his true Christian spirit. His whole life was,
however, a practical expression of his religious faith; as is shown to us by
what has been said or written by all who came in contact with him.
The following tribute to his memory from Monsieur Dumas is yet one
further proof of the universal feeling which his friendship inspired, "I do
not know whether there is a savant who would not feel happy in leaving
behind him such works as those with which Faraday has gladdened his
contemporaries, and which he has left as a legacy to posterity; but I am
certain that all those who have known him would wish to approach that
moral perfection which he attained to without effort. In him it appeared to
be a natural grace, which made him a professor, full of ardour for the
diffusion of truth, an indefatigable worker, full of enthusiasm and
sprightliness in his laboratory, the best and most amiable of men in the
bosom of his family, and the most enlightened preacher among the humble
flock whose faith he followed.
"The simplicity of his heart, his candour, his ardent love of the truth, his
fellow interest in all the successes, and ingenuous admiration of all the

discoveries of others, his natural modesty in regard to what he himself
discovered, his noble soul—independent and bold—all these combined
gave an incomparable charm to the illustrious physicist.
"I have never known a man more worthy of being loved,—of being
admired,—of being mourned. Fidelity to his religious faith, and the constant
observance of the moral law, constitute the ruling characteristics of his
life.... There is more than one useful lesson to be learnt from the proper
study of this illustrious man, whose youth endured poverty with dignity,
whose mature age bore honours with moderation, and whose last years
passed gently away surrounded by marks of respect and tender affection."
Several stories are told that illustrate the constant habit of experimenting
which seemed to be innate in Faraday's mind, and also show how simple
were the means which he often adopted to attain a required end. An
example of the latter is given us by Sir Frederick Arrow in describing a visit
which he, as one of the Committee of the Elder Brethren of the Trinity
House, paid, to observe the Dungeness electric light, in June 1862. The
committee accompanied Faraday, who had always been a most energetic
worker in the cause of the Trinity House.
"We dined," says Sir Frederick Arrow, "I think at Dover, and embarked in
the yacht from there, and were out for some hours watching it, to Faraday's
great delight—(a very fine night)—and especially we did so from the Varne
lightship about equi-distant between it and the French light of Grisnez,
using all our best glasses and photometers to ascertain the relative value of
the lights; and this brings me to my story. Before we left Dover, Faraday,
with his usual bright smile, in great glee showed me a little common paper-
box, and said, 'I must take care of this; it's my special photometer,'—and
then, opening it, produced a lady's ordinary black shawl pin—jet, or
imitation perhaps—and then, holding it a little way off the candle, showed
me the image very distinct; and then putting it a little further off, placed
another candle near it, and the relative distance was shown by the size of
the image. He lent me this afterwards when we were at the Varne lightship,
and it acted admirably; ever since I have used one as a very convenient
mode of observing, and I never do so but I think of that night and dear good
Faraday, and his genial happy way of showing how even common things
may be made useful."

Such men as had occasion to work in the laboratory with Faraday, were
always struck by his lively enthusiasm, and the great activity with which he
worked—"his motions were wonderfully rapid; and if he had to cross the
laboratory for anything, he did not walk at an ordinary step but ran for it,
and when he wanted anything he spoke quickly."
In his methods of working he was most exact. Having carefully planned out
in his own mind work to be done, he would enter the laboratory, and with
his table unencumbered with anything beyond such things as he was using,
would set to work in a grave, silent manner. After a time, however, as the
experiment proceeded and the result which he had anticipated began to
manifest itself, he would begin humming a tune, and even speak to his
attendant of the expected result. On finishing such experimental work for
the day, everything had to be put carefully away, all bottles stoppered, open
vessels covered over, all instruments and materials returned to their various
drawers, all rubbish cleared from the floor, and the laboratory left ready for
the Professor to start work again. Faraday would then go upstairs to his
study, and think further on the subject on which he happened to be working.
In his later years we are told that he invariably carried about with him
convenient sized cards on which he could jot down at once—in the street, in
the lecture room, at a friend's, indeed anywhere—such thoughts as should
flash across his mind.
A few words deserve to be said with regard to Sergeant Anderson, who for
over thirty years acted as Faraday's laboratory assistant at the Royal
Institution. In 1829, when Faraday was working at experiments on the
manufacture of glass for optical purposes, a special furnace was erected at
the Royal Institution, and Anderson was engaged to assist at it. After the
glass experiments were over, however, Anderson, who had demonstrated his
usefulness, was retained, and he continued throughout the rest of Faraday's
life as his assistant, having won the good opinion not only of the Professor
but of all with whom he had anything to do. There is one good story told of
Anderson, who had been chosen for his post on account of the habits of
strict obedience, which his military training had given him. His duty was to
keep the furnaces always at the same heat, and the water in the ashpit
always at the same level. In the evening he was released; but one night
Faraday forgot to tell Anderson he could go, and early next morning he

found his faithful servant still stoking the glowing furnace, as he had been
doing all night long.

CHAPTER X.
About the Royal Institution.

"The heights by great men reached and kept
Were not attained by sudden flight,
But they, while their companions slept,
Were toiling upward in the night.

Standing on what too long we bore,
With shoulders bent and downcast eyes,
We may discern—unseen before—
A path to higher destinies.

Nor deem the irrevocable past
As wholly wasted, wholly vain,
If, rising on its wrecks, at last
To something nobler we attain."
Longfellow.

The Royal Institution, which for so many years was "home" to Michael
Faraday, must ever remain intimately associated with his name. It is not a
hundred years since it was founded, yet its history is the history of Sir
Humphry Davy, Michael Faraday, and John Tyndall—or perhaps it would
be more correct to say that its history is in a large measure a history of
experimental research during the century. Before regarding the Institution as
it is especially connected with the life-story of Michael Faraday, it may be
well to just glance at its origin.
Early in the year 1799 a party of noblemen and gentlemen met at the house
of Sir Joseph Banks for the purpose of forming themselves, at the
suggestion of Count Rumford, into a "Society for bettering the condition of
the poor." Count Rumford and his friends were most anxious for the success
of their undertaking; and having once made a start did not remain idle, but

in January, 1800, succeeded in having their Society incorporated by Royal
Charter. The Society started perhaps on a somewhat narrower basis than
that on which it now stands; its original object was that it should be "an
institution for diffusing the knowledge, and facilitating the general
introduction of useful mechanical inventions and improvements; and for
teaching by courses of philosophical lectures and experiments, the
application of science to the common purposes of life."
In a guide to London published in the early part of the present century, No.
21, Albemarle Street is thus referred to: "Here is also the Society's house for
the encouragement of improvements in arts and manufactures, or the Royal
Institution. The front of this house is barricaded by double windows, to
prevent the entrance of cold in winter and heat in summer. Here is a room
for experimental dinners, and a kitchen fitted up on the late Count
Rumford's plan. Adjoining this is a large workshop, in which a number of
coppersmiths, braziers, etc., are employed, and over this a large room for
the reception of such models of machinery as may be presented to the
Institution." It has been said that chemistry dates one of its chief epochs
from the foundation of the Royal Institution laboratory.
The large building in Albemarle Street cannot be mistaken, for there are
along the front of it fourteen great fluted Corinthian columns which give a
striking appearance to the premises. These columns were built on to the
face of the building in 1838, at a cost of five hundred pounds, by Mr. Lewis
Vulliamy.

From photo by] ROYAL INSTITUTION, ALBEMARLE STREET. [H.
Dixon & Son.]
That the Royal Institution is, indeed, well worth visiting it must be quite
unnecessary to say. Even was there not much to be seen which is of itself
interesting, the place would have an attraction as being the place where so
much has been done for the advancement of science by Faraday, his
predecessors, Davy, Rumford, and Brande, and by Tyndall, and other
successors.

From photo by] LECTURE-THEATRE, ROYAL INSTITUTION. [H.
Dixon & Son.
On entering the building we find ourselves in a lofty hall; in front of us, at
the head of a short flight of stone steps, is a large portrait of Sir Humphry
Davy, while to the right we see Foley's fine and striking statue of Faraday,
which was placed there as being the most fitting memorial of the great
man's connection with the Institution. On going up the flight of steps to the
right, we find ourselves in the well-appointed library, where we are shown
under a glass case a beautiful little statuette of Faraday, and also a large
photograph portrait of the philosopher. We next visit the lecture-theatre, our
eyes being immediately drawn to the "seat over the clock," where Michael
Faraday as a boy first sat, and listened and marvelled at the wonders of
chemistry unfolded before him by the great Humphry Davy. This theatre it

may be noted is one of the best for its acoustic properties in London. Well
may we pause here—thinking of the great men who have lectured here, and
of the great men who have come here to listen. It may be mentioned that the
lectures are not strictly confined to scientific subjects, for it was here, in
1812, that Thomas Campbell gave his course of lectures on poetry, and that
another poet—Thomas Moore—was also invited to lecture.
From the lecture-theatre we are taken downstairs to see the room where all
the numerous instruments and materials are kept. Here we are shown the
primitive electrical machine, which Faraday early constructed for himself,
and many of the things which he used in his work; here, too, we have
pointed out to us a large glass-case running along one side of the room, and
divided into sections, each section containing the tools and appliances used
by one or other of the great men of the Institution, Davy and Brande and
Faraday himself. In several of the smaller rooms through which we are
permitted to pass, we notice among the many portraits several of the
subjects of this little work. And among other interesting things especially
pointed out to us there is a locked glass-case "presented to the Royal
Institution by Michael and Sarah Faraday" (it was characteristic of Faraday
thus to put his wife in as one of the donors). This case contains several
books which Michael had himself bound in those days when, disliking
trade, he was seeking to enter the service of science. There are, besides,
several books of Davy's and several manuscripts of his also, which his
assistant had carefully kept.
And not only is the building worthy a visit on account of the many
interesting relics it contains of some of our greatest scientists, and on
account of the memoirs of its many great men, but even to the unscientific
there is much that is attractive in the Friday Evening Lectures, which since
that year 1826, when Faraday may be said to have inaugurated them, up to
now, have been regularly carried on. No trouble is spared by the lecturers to
make their matter understood, and innumerable experiments are presented
on these occasions. The experiments, too, are such as often require a great
expenditure of time and trouble in their preparation. As an instance of this I
may mention an experiment which was made on the occasion of my latest
attendance at a "Friday evening." The lecturer was Professor Harold Dixon;
the subject of which he was treating was "The Rate of Explosion of Gases."
To show the rapidity with which an explosion of a certain gas travelled, the

lecturer had fitted up a leaden piping all round the theatre; the ends of the
piping rested upon either end of the table at which Professor Dixon was
lecturing. The piping was filled with gas, and the Professor applied a light
at one end; a sharp explosion took place as the gas was fired, and was
followed almost instantaneously by an explosion at the other end of the
pipe—the explosion having in that very short time travelled through a
length of two hundred and twenty feet of piping! I quote this instance to
show that no trouble is spared in preparing an illustrative experiment,
although such experiment may be demonstrated in a minute or less.
It may be appropriate, while considering the long connection of Faraday
with the scene of his many experimental triumphs, to refer more
particularly to that unique meeting which took place last summer (June 8th,
1891) in celebration of the hundredth anniversary of the birth of Faraday,
and to which slight reference is made in the last chapter. The meeting,
appropriately enough, took the form of a gathering in the theatre of the
Royal Institution of many of the most able and distinguished chemists of
the day; Lord Rayleigh delivering an address on the developments of
Faraday's discoveries. The chair was taken by His Royal Highness the
Prince of Wales, who referred in his opening remarks to the time when he
had sat in that theatre and listened to Faraday himself. The letter from
H.R.H., which is quoted on p. 131, was read, as was also the following
letter which the Prince wrote to Mrs. Faraday on the occasion of her
husband's death.

"Wiesbaden, September 10, 1867.
"Dear Mrs. Faraday,—Although I have not the pleasure of knowing
you, I cannot resist sending you a few lines to tell you how deeply
grieved and distressed I am to hear of the death of your husband,
Professor Faraday. Having had the great pleasure of knowing him for
some years, and having heard his interesting lectures when quite a boy,
I can fully appreciate how great the loss must be, not only to you, but
to the whole country at large, where his name was deeply venerated by
all classes. His name will not only be remembered as a great and
distinguished scientific man, but also as a good man, whose excellent
and amiable qualities were so universally known. Pardon my

trespassing so soon on your great grief, and believe me, dear Mrs.
Faraday, yours very sincerely,
"Albert Edward."

A very interesting yet pathetic letter was read from Dr. Tyndall, which,
coming as it did from a man who had so well known and so thoroughly
appreciated Faraday, is of great interest to us. "As Faraday recedes from me
in time," wrote Tyndall, "he becomes to me more and more beautiful.
Anything, therefore, calculated to do honour to his memory must command
my entire sympathy. But the utmost liberty I can now allow myself is to be
shifted from my bed to a couch, and wheeled to a position near the window,
from which I can see the bloom of the gorse and the brown of the heather.
Thus, considerations affecting the body only present an insuperable barrier
to my going to London on Wednesday."
Not very far from Albemarle Street, is Blandford Street, where it will be
remembered Michael Faraday began the battle of life as a newsboy. Mr.
Riebau's shop (No. 2) is yet standing, and is still a stationer's and
bookseller's. Over the shop front is now to be observed a plaque, on which
are the simple words, "Michael Faraday, Man of Science, apprentice here,
1791-1867." Professor Tyndall tells us of a pleasing story of a visit which
he paid with the ex-bookbinder to this scene of his early labours. "Mr.
Faraday and myself quitted the Institution one evening together, to pay a
visit in Baker Street. He took my arm at the door, and pressing it to his side
in his warm genial way, said, 'Come, Tyndall, I will now show you
something that will interest you.' We reached Blandford Street; and after a
little looking about, he paused before a stationer's shop, and then went in.
On entering the shop, his usual animation seemed doubled; he looked
rapidly at everything it contained. To the left on entering was a door,
through which he looked down into a little room, with a window in front
facing Blandford Street. Drawing me toward him, he said eagerly, 'Look
there, Tyndall, that was my working-place. I bound books in that little
nook.' A respectable-looking woman stood behind the counter; his
conversation with me was too low to be heard by her, and he now turned to
the counter to buy some cards as an excuse for our being there. He asked
the woman her name—her predecessor's name—his predecessor's name.
'That won't do,' he said, with good-humoured impatience; 'who was his

predecessor?' 'Mr. Riebau,' she replied, and immediately added, as if
suddenly recollecting herself, 'He, sir, was the master of Sir Charles
Faraday!' 'Nonsense!' he responded, 'there is no such person!' Great was her
delight when I told her the name of her visitor; but she assured me that as
soon as she saw him running about the shop, she felt—though she did not
know why—that it must be Sir Charles Faraday!"
Turning to our right on coming out of No. 2, Blandford Street, we shall
notice on the opposite side of the way a small turning down under an
archway. That turning is the beginning of Jacob's Well Mews, where the
Faraday family lived, and of which an illustration has been given on an
earlier page of this book. The place is interesting and worthy of a visit, as
showing us that however poor and unpromising may be the surroundings of
a man's childhood, he may yet win for himself an enduring name, as has
Michael Faraday, not only in the annals of his own country, but in those of
knowledge—whose annals are concerned not with one, but with all
countries.
A most interesting and pleasant trip, too, may be taken to Hampton Court
Green, where a visit can be paid to the house, the use of which Her Majesty
the Queen so kindly gave to the Professor, and where he passed the greater
part of the last ten years of his life. Of the very many visitors to the famous
palace and gardens of Hampton Court, there are, I fear, not a very large
proportion who notice the charming little house facing the Green, and not
far from the entrance to the Palace where the Professor lived. "Faraday
House," however, appears much the same as it did when he whose name it
now bears was living there. With its front all overgrown with ivy and
Virginian creeper, with its creeper-bowered archway from the gate to the
front door, with its trees and shrubs all along the front, and with its view
across the Green to the trees in the Palace grounds beyond, the old-
fashioned house has a delightful aspect, and seems indeed an ideal spot to
which a man of Faraday's simple, unpretentious, yet nature-loving
character, could retire after a long life of arduous and useful work.
The following "in memoriam" poem, which appeared in the pages of Punch
shortly after Faraday's death, so beautifully sums up much of the man's life
and character, that it may be fittingly quoted as a conclusion to this short
account of the life of the illustrious philosopher, a life which must impress

all who have studied it as one of the purest and most unselfish of which we
have any record.

"Statesmen and soldiers, authors, artists,—still
The topmost leaves fall off our English oak:
Some in green summer's prime, some in the chill
Of autumn-tide, some by late winter's stroke.

Another leaf has dropped on that sere heap—
One that hung highest; earliest to invite
The golden kiss of morn, and last to keep
The fire of eve—but still turned to the light.

No soldier's, statesman's, poet's, painter's name
Was this, through which is drawn death's last black line;
But one of rarer, if not loftier fame—
A priest of Truth, who lived within her shrine.

A priest of Truth: his office to expound
Earth's mysteries to all who willed to hear—
Who in the book of science sought and found,
With love, that knew all reverence, but no fear.

A priest who prayed as well as ministered:
Who grasped the faith he preached, and held it fast:
Knowing the light he followed never stirred,
Howe'er might drive the clouds through which it past.

And if Truth's priest, servant of Science too,
Whose work was wrought for love and not for gain:
Not one of those who serve but to ensue
Their private profit: lordship to attain

Over their lord, and bind him in green withes,
For grinding at the mill 'neath rod and cord;
Of the large grist that they may take their tithes—
So some serve Science that call Science lord.

One rule his life was fashioned to fulfil:
That he who tends Truth's shrine, and does the hest
Of Science with a humble faithful will

Of Science, with a humble, faithful will,
The God of Truth and Knowledge serveth best.

And from his humbleness what heights he won!
By slow march of induction, pace on pace,
Scaling the peaks that seem to strike the sun,
Whence few can look, unblinded, in his face.

Until he reached the stand which they that win
A bird's-eye glance o'er Nature's realm may throw;
Whence the mind's ken by larger sweeps takes in
What seems confusion, looked at from below.

Till out of seeming chaos order grows,
In ever-widening orbs of law restrained,
And the Creation's mighty music flows
In perfect harmony, serene, sustained;

And from varieties of force and power,
A larger unity and larger still,
Broadens to view, till in some breathless hour
All force is known, grasped in a central Will,

Thunder and light revealed as one same strength—
Modes of the force that works at Nature's heart—
And through the Universe's veinèd length
Bids, wave on wave, mysterious pulses dart.

That cosmic heart-beat it was his to list,
To trace those pulses in their ebb and flow
Towards the fountain-head, where they subsist
In form as yet not given e'en him to know.

Yet, living face to face with these great laws,
Great truths, great myst'ries, all who saw him near
Knew him for childlike, simple, free from flaws
Of temper, full of love that casts out fear:

Untired in charity, of cheer serene;
N i ld' lh d d

Not caring world's wealth or good word to earn;
Childhood's or manhood's ear content to win;
And still as glad to teach as meek to learn.

Such lives are precious: not so much for all
Of wider insight won where they have striven,
As for the still small voice with which they call
Along the beamy way from earth to heaven."

THE END.

LONDON: KNIGHT, PRINTER, MIDDLE STREET, ALDERSGATE,
E.C.

FOOTNOTES:
[1] Erasmus Darwin, author of The Botanic Garden, Loves of the Plants, etc.,
and grandfather of the more famous Charles Darwin.
[2] It may be noted here that there are several spurious stories told of Faraday's
first visit to the Institution and his introduction to Davy. The story as told here is
as Faraday himself told it to Davy's biographer.
[3] It is interesting to note that Sir Humphry Davy was only thirteen years the
senior of Michael Faraday.
[4] Some of the books which Faraday bound for the Royal Institution are there
now; kept carefully with other relics of the great chemist. See the chapter
entitled "About the Royal Institution."
[5] Chevreul, many readers will remember, lived to celebrate his hundredth
birthday in 1886, and all his life continued experiments in his fascinating
science. He died on the 10th of April, 1889.
[6] So was Faraday described in the passport issued to him at Paris.
[7] The works of art which Faraday refers to are the Laocoön, the Venus de
Medici, the Dying Gladiator, and other sculpture brought from Rome to Paris by
Napoleon after one of his Italian campaigns. Faraday must have been gratified at
their return to Rome the year after his words were written.
[8] Founded in 1831, for the purpose of stimulating scientific inquiry.

[9] Author of Conversations on Chemistry, a work which had had a considerable
influence on Faraday in his early youth.
[10] It is interesting here to see what Tyndall says, referring to Faraday as a
lecturer: "I doubt his unconcern, but his fearlessness was often manifested. It
used to rise within him as a wave, which carried both him and his audience
along with it. On rare occasions also, when he felt himself and his subject
hopelessly unintelligible, he suddenly evoked a certain recklessness of thought;
and without halting to extricate his bewildered followers, he would dash alone
through the jungle into which he had unwittingly led them; thus saving them
from ennui by the exhibition of a vigour which, for the time being, they could
neither share nor comprehend."
[11] A non-metallic element first discovered in 1774 by Scheele, and the subject
of much research to succeeding chemists.
[12] Engineering for June 19th, 1891.

Transcriber's Notes:
Footnotes have been moved to the end of the text and renumbered consecutively through
the document.
Illustrations have been moved to paragraph breaks near where they are discussed. This
has sometimes left consecutive page numbers right next to each other.
Punctuation has been made consistent.
Variations in spelling and hyphenation were retained as they appear in the original
publication.
Changes have been made as follows:
Page 135: "whe" changed to "who" (anyone who claimed his attention)
Page 157: "precedessor" changed to "predecessor" (predecessor?' 'Mr. Riebau,)
Page 158: "virginian" changed to "Virginian" (with ivy and Virginian creeper)

*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK MICHAEL
FARADAY, MAN OF SCIENCE ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
States without permission and without paying copyright royalties.
Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license,
apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic
works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and
trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not
be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of
the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the Project
Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for copies of this
eBook, complying with the trademark license is very easy. You may
use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative
works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg eBooks
may be modified and printed and given away—you may do practically
ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S.
copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license,
especially commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG™ LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or
any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
Gutenberg License available with this file or online at
www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing
Project Gutenberg electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg electronic
work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept
all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
all copies of Project Gutenberg electronic works in your possession. If
you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg
electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms of this
agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom
you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people
who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg electronic
works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the

collection of Project Gutenberg electronic works. Nearly all the
individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the
United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in
the United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
that you will support the Project Gutenberg mission of promoting free
access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg works
in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project
Gutenberg name associated with the work. You can easily comply with
the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format
with its attached full Project Gutenberg License when you share it
without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
other Project Gutenberg work. The Foundation makes no
representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
access to, the full Project Gutenberg License must appear prominently
whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg work (any work on which
the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase
“Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed,
viewed, copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States
and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
under the terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License included with

this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located
in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the
country where you are located before using this eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg electronic work is derived
from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a
notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright
holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the United
States without paying any fees or charges. If you are redistributing or
providing access to a work with the phrase “Project Gutenberg”
associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply either with
the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain
permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg
trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
will be linked to the Project Gutenberg License for all works posted
with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of
this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide
access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg work in a format
other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official

version posted on the official Project Gutenberg website
(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of
obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain
Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the
full Project Gutenberg License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg electronic works provided
that:

• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from the
use of Project Gutenberg works calculated using the method you
already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the
owner of the Project Gutenberg trademark, but he has agreed to donate
royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days
following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to
prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly
marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information about
donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”

• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does
not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You
must require such a user to return or destroy all copies of the works
possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use of and all
access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.

• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
receipt of the work.

• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free distribution
of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™
electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth
in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of the
Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in
Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend
considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and
proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the
Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may be
stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete,
inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES -
Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in
paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation,
the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party
distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this
agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and
expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO
REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH
OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE
FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY
DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT,
CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES

EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you
discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it,
you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by
sending a written explanation to the person you received the work
from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must return
the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity that
provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a
replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work
electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to
give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu
of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a
refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If
any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law
of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the
Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the
Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any
volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution
of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability,
costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly
from any of the following which you do or cause to occur: (a)

distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg work, (b) alteration,
modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg work,
and (c) any Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project
Gutenberg

Project Gutenberg is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg’s goals
and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg collection will remain freely
available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure and
permanent future for Project Gutenberg and future generations. To
learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and
the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the state
of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue
Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification number is
64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S.
federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 41 Watchung Plaza
#516, Montclair NJ 07042, USA, +1 (862) 621-9288. Email contact

links and up to date contact information can be found at the
Foundation’s website and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small
donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax
exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United States.
Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a considerable
effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up with these
requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where we have
not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg
electronic works

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg
concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project
Gutenberg eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search facility:
www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg, including
how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.