The Tribes and Castes of the Central Provinces of India_ Volume 4 R. V. Russell 2439 downloads.pdf

762 pages · Make another flipbook

Page 1

Page 2

Page 3

The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Tribes and Castes
of the Central Provinces of India, Volume 4

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you
will have to check the laws of the country where you are located
before using this eBook.

Title: The Tribes and Castes of the Central Provinces of India, Volume
4

Author: R. V. Russell

Release date: February 25, 2007 [eBook #20668]

Language: English

Other information and formats: www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/20668

Credits: Produced by Jeroen Hellingman and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net/ (This file was
produced partly from images generously made available by
The Internet Archive/Million Book Project)

*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE TRIBES
AND CASTES OF THE CENTRAL PROVINCES OF INDIA, VOLUME
4 ***

Page 4

The Tribes and Castes of the

Central Provinces of India

Page 5

By
R.V. Russell
Of the Indian Civil Service Superintendent of
Ethnography, Central Provinces
Assisted by
Rai Bahadur Hira Lāl
Extra Assistant Commissioner

Page 6

Published Under the Orders of the Central
Provinces Administration
In Four Volumes
Vol. IV.
Macmillan and Co., Limited St. Martin’s Street,
London.
1916

Page 7

Contents of Volume IV

Page 8

Articles on Castes and Tribes of the Central
Provinces in Alphabetical Order
The articles which are considered to be of most general interest are shown
in capitals

Kumhār (Potter) 3
Kunbi (Cultivator) 16
Kunjra (Greengrocer) 50
Kuramwār (Shepherd) 52
Kurmi (Cultivator) 55
Lakhera (Worker in lac) 104
Lodhi (Landowner and cultivator) 112
Lohār (Blacksmith) 120
Lorha (Growers of san-hemp) 126
Mahār (Weaver and labourer) 129
Mahli (Forest tribe) 146
Majhwar (Forest tribe) 149
Māl (Forest tribe) 153
Māla (Cotton-weaver and labourer) 156
Māli (Gardener and vegetable-grower) 159
Mallāh (Boatman and fisherman) 171
Māna (Forest tribe, cultivator) 172
Mānbhao (Religious mendicant) 176
Māng (Labourer and village musician) 184
Māng-Garori (Criminal caste) 189
Manihār (Pedlar) 193
Mannewār (Forest tribe) 195
Marātha (Soldier, cultivator and service) 198
Mehtar (Sweeper and scavenge) 215
Meo (Tribe) 233
Mīna or Deswāli (Non-Aryan tribe, cultivator) 235

Page 9

Mirāsi (Bard and genealogist) 242
Mochi (Shoemaker) 244
Mowār (Cultivator) 250
Murha (Digger and navvy) 252
Nagasia (Forest tribe) 257
Nāhal (Forest tribe) 259
Nai (Barber) 262
Naoda (Boatman and fisherman) 283
Nat (Acrobat) 286
Nunia (Salt-refiner; digger and navvy) 294
Ojha (Augur and soothsayer) 296
Oraon (Forest tribe) 299
Pāik (Soldier, cultivator) 321
Panka (Labourer and village watchman) 324
Panwār Rājpūt (Landowner and cultivator) 330
Pardhān (Minstrel and priest) 352
Pārdhi (Hunter and fowler) 359
Parja (Forest tribe) 371
Pāsi (Toddy-drawer and labourer) 380
Patwa (Maker of silk braid and thread) 385
Pindāri (Freebooter) 388
Prabhu (Writer and clerk) 399
Rāghuvansi (Cultivator) 403
Rājjhar (Agricultural labourer) 405
Rājpūt (Soldier and landowner) 410
Rājpūt Clans
Baghel. Hūna.
Bāgri. Kachhwāha.
Bais. Nāgvansi.
Baksaria. Nikumbh.
Banāphar. Pāik.
Bhadauria. Parihār.
Bisen. Rāthor.
Bundela. Sesodia.
Chandel. Solankhi.

Page 10

Chauhān. Somvansi.
Dhākar. Sūrajvansi.
Gaharwār. Tomara.
Gaur. Yādu.
Haihaya.
Rajwār (Forest tribe) 470
Rāmosi (Village watchmen and labourers, formerly thieves) 472
Rangrez (Dyer) 477
Rautia (Forest tribe and cultivators, formerly soldiers) 479
Sanaurhia (Criminal thieving caste) 483
Sānsia (Vagrant criminal tribe) 488
Sānsia (Uria) (Mason and digger) 496
Savar (Forest tribe) 500
Sonjhara (Gold-washer) 509
Sudh (Cultivator) 514
Sunār (Goldsmith and silversmith) 517
Sundi (Liquor distiller) 534
Tamera (Coppersmith) 536
Taonla (Soldier and labourer) 539
Teli (Oilman) 542
Thug (Criminal community of murderers by strangulation) 558
Turi (Bamboo-worker) 588
Velama (Cultivator) 593
Vidur (Village accountant, clerk and writer) 596
Wāghya (Religious mendicant) 603
Yerūkala (Criminal thieving caste) 606

Page 11

Illustrations in Volume IV
97. Potter and his wheel 4
98. Group of Kunbis 16
99. Figures of animals made for Pola festival 40
100. Hindu boys on stilts 42
101. Throwing stilts into the water at the Pola festival 46
102. Carrying out the dead 48
103. Pounding rice 60
104. Sowing 84
105. Threshing 86
106. Winnowing 88
107. Women grinding wheat and husking rice 90
108. Group of women in Hindustāni dress 92
109. Coloured Plate: Examples of spangles worn by women on the
forehead 106
110. Weaving: sizing the warp 142
111. Winding thread 144
112. Bride and bridegroom with marriage crowns 166
113. Bullocks drawing water with mot 170
114. Māng musicians with drums 186
115. Statue of Marātha leader, Bīmbāji Bhonsla, in armour 200
116. Image of the god Vishnu as Vithoba 248
117. Coolie women with babies slung at the side 256
118. Hindu men showing the choti or scalp-lock 272
119. Snake-charmer with cobras 292
120. Transplanting rice 340
121. Group of Pardhāns 352
122. Little girls playing 400
123. Gujarati girls doing figures with strings and sticks 402
124. Ornaments 524
125. Teli’s oil-press 544
126. The Goddess Kāli 574

Page 12

127. Wāghya mendicants 604

Page 13

Pronunciation

a, has the sound of u in but or murmur.
ā has the sound of a in bath or tar.
e has the sound of é in écarté or ai in maid.
i has the sound of i in bit, or (as a final letter) of y in sulky.
ī has the sound of ee in beet.
o has the sound of o in bore or bowl.
u has the sound of u in put or bull.
ū has the sound of oo in poor or boot

The plural of caste names and a few common Hindustāni words is formed
by adding s in the English manner according to ordinary usage, though this
is not, of course, the Hindustāni plural.

Note.—The rupee contains 16 annas, and an anna is of the same value as a
penny. A pice is a quarter of an anna, or a farthing. Rs. 1–8 signifies one
rupee and eight annas. A lakh is a hundred thousand, and a krore ten
million.

Page 14

Part II

Page 15

Articles on Castes and Tribes

Page 16

Kumhār—Yemkala

Page 17

Vol. IV

Page 18

Kumhār
List of Paragraphs

1. Traditions of origin
2. Caste sub-divisions
3. Social Customs
4. The Kumhār as a village menial
5. Occupation
6. Breeding pigs for sacrifices
7. The goddess Demeter
8. Estimation of the pig in India
9. The buffalo as a corn-god
10. The Dasahra festival
11. The goddess Devi

1. Traditions of origin

Kumhār, Kumbhār.—The caste of potters, the name being derived from
the Sanskrit kumbh, a water-pot. The Kumhārs numbered nearly 120,000
persons in the Central Provinces in 1911 and were most numerous in the
northern and eastern or Hindustāni-speaking Districts, where earthen vessels
have a greater vogue than in the south. The caste is of course an ancient one,
vessels of earthenware having probably been in use at a very early period,
and the old Hindu scriptures consequently give various accounts of its origin
from mixed marriages between the four classical castes. “Concerning the
traditional parentage of the caste,” Sir H. Risley writes,1 “there seems to be a
wide difference of opinion among the recognised authorities on the subject.
Thus the Brahma Vaivārtta Purāna says that the Kumbhakār or maker of

Page 19

water-jars (kumbka), is born of a Vaishya woman by a Brāhman father; the
Parāsara Samhita makes the father a Mālākār (gardener) and the mother a
Chamār; while the Parāsara Padhati holds that the ancestor of the caste was
begotten of a Tili woman by a Pattikār or weaver of silk cloth.” Sir Monier
Williams again, in his Sanskrit Dictionary, describes them as the offspring of
a Kshatriya woman by a Brāhman. No importance can of course be attached
to such statements as the above from the point of view of actual fact, but
they are interesting as showing the view taken of the formation of castes by
the old Brāhman writers, and also the position given to the Kumhār at the
time when they wrote. This varies from a moderately respectable to a very
humble one according to the different accounts of his lineage. The caste
themselves have a legend of the usual Brāhmanical type: “In the Kritayuga,
when Maheshwar (Siva) intended to marry the daughter of Hemvanta, the
Devas and Asuras2 assembled at Kailās (Heaven). Then a question arose as
to who should furnish the vessels required for the ceremony, and one
Kulālaka, a Brāhman, was ordered to make them. Then Kulālaka stood
before the assembly with folded hands, and prayed that materials might be
given to him for making the pots. So Vishnu gave his Sudarsana (discus) to
be used as a wheel, and the mountain of Mandāra was fixed as a pivot
beneath it to hold it up. The scraper was Adi Kūrma the tortoise, and a rain-
cloud was used for the water-tub. So Kulālaka made the pots and gave them
to Maheshwar for his marriage, and ever since his descendants have been
known as Kumbhakār or maker of water-jars.”

Page 20

Potter and his wheel

2. Caste sub-divisions

The Kumhārs have a number of subcastes, many of which, as might be
expected, are of the territorial type and indicate the different localities from
which they migrated to the Central Provinces. Such are the Mālwi from
Mālwa, the Telenga from the Telugu country in Hyderābād, the Pardeshi
from northern India and the Marātha from the Marātha Districts. Other
divisions are the Lingāyats who belong to the sect of this name, the
Gadhewāl or Gadhere who make tiles and carry them about on donkeys
(gadha), the Bardia who use bullocks for transport and the Sungaria who
keep pigs (suar). Certain endogamous groups have arisen simply from
differences in the method of working. Thus the Hāthgarhia3 mould vessels
with their hands only without using the wheel; the Goria4 make white or red
pots only and not black ones; the Kurere mould their vessels on a stone slab
revolving on a stick and not on a wheel; while the Chakere are Kumhārs who
use the wheel (chāk) in localities where other Kumhārs do not use it. The

Page 21

Chhutakia and Rakhotia are illegitimate sections, being the offspring of kept
women.

3. Social Customs

Girls are married at an early age when their parents can afford it, the matches
being usually arranged at caste feasts. In Chānda parents who allow a
daughter to become adolescent while still unwed are put out of caste, but
elsewhere the rule is by no means so strict. The ceremony is of the normal
type and a Brāhman usually officiates, but in Betūl it is performed by the
Sawāsa or husband of the bride’s paternal aunt. After the wedding the couple
are given kneaded flour to hold in their hands and snatch from each other as
an emblem of their trade. In Mandla a bride price of Rs. 50 is paid.

The Kumhārs recognise divorce and the remarriage of widows. If an
unmarried girl is detected in criminal intimacy with a member of the caste,
she has to give a feast to the caste-fellows and pay a fine of Rs. 1–4 and five
locks of her hair are also cut off by way of purification. The caste usually
burn the dead, but the Lingāyat Kumhārs always bury them in accordance
with the practice of their sect. They worship the ordinary Hindu deities and
make an offering to the implements of their trade on the festival of Deothān
Igāras. The village Brāhman serves as their priest. In Bālāghāt a Kumhār is
put out of caste if a dead cat is found in his house. At the census of 1901 the
Kumhār was ranked with the impure castes, but his status is not really so
low. Sir D. Ibbetson said of him: “He is a true village menial; his social
standing is very low, far below that of the Lohār and not much above the
Chamār. His association with that impure beast, the donkey, the animal
sacred to Sitala, the smallpox goddess, pollutes him and also his readiness to
carry manure and sweepings.” As already seen there are in the Central
Provinces Sungaria and Gadheria subcastes which keep donkeys and pigs,
and these are regarded as impure. But in most Districts the Kumhār ranks not
much below the Barhai and Lohār, that is in what I have designated the
grade of village menials above the impure and below the cultivating castes.

Page 22

In Bengal the Kumhārs have a much higher status and Brāhmans will take
water from their hands. But the gradation of caste in Bengal differs very
greatly from that of other parts of India.

4. The Kumhār as a village menial

The Kumhār is not now paid regularly by dues from the cultivators like other
village menials, as the ordinary system of sale has no doubt been found more
convenient in his case. But he sometimes takes the soiled grass from the
stalls of the cattle and gives pots free to the cultivator in exchange. On Akti
day, at the beginning of the agricultural year, the village Kumhār of Saugor
presents five pots with covers on them to each cultivator and receives 2½
lbs. of grain in exchange. One of these the tenant fills with water and
presents to a Brāhman and the rest he reserves for his own purposes. On the
occasion of a wedding also the bridegroom’s party take the bride to the
Kumhārin’s house as part of the sohāg ceremony for making the marriage
propitious. The Kumhār seats the bride on his wheel and turns it round with
her seven times. The Kumhārin presents her with seven new pots, which are
taken back to the house and used at the wedding. They are filled with water
and are supposed to represent the seven seas. If any two of these pots
accidentally clash together it is supposed that the bride and bridegroom will
quarrel during their married life. In return for this the Kumhārin receives a
present of clothes. At a funeral also the Kumhār must supply thirteen vessels
which are known as ghāts, and must also replace the broken earthenware.
Like the other village menials at the harvest he takes a new vessel to the
cultivator in his field and receives a present of grain. These customs appear
to indicate his old position as one of the menials or general servants of the
village ranking below the cultivators. Grant-Duff also includes the potter in
his list of village menials in the Marātha villages.5

Page 23

5. Occupation

The potter is not particular as to the clay he uses and does not go far afield
for the finer qualities, but digs it from the nearest place in the neighbourhood
where he can get it free of cost. Red and black clay are employed, the former
being obtained near the base of hills or on high-lying land, probably of the
laterite formation, and the latter in the beds of tanks or streams. When the
clay is thoroughly kneaded and ready for use a lump of it is placed on the
centre of the wheel. The potter seats himself in front of the wheel and fixes
his stick or chakrait into the slanting hole in its upper surface. With this stick
the wheel is made to revolve very rapidly, and sufficient impetus is given to
it to keep it in motion for several minutes. The potter then lays aside the
stick and with his hands moulds the lump of clay into the shape required,
stopping every now and then to give the wheel a fresh spin as it loses its
momentum. When satisfied with the shape of his vessel he separates it from
the lump with a piece of string, and places it on a bed of ashes to prevent it
sticking to the ground. The wheel is either a circular disc cut out of a single
piece of stone about a yard in diameter, or an ordinary wooden wheel with
spokes forming two diameters at right angles. The rim is then thickened with
the addition of a coating of mud strengthened with fibre.6 The articles made
by the potter are ordinary circular vessels or gharas used for storing and
collecting water, larger ones for keeping grain, flour and vegetables, and
surāhis or amphoras for drinking-water. In the manufacture of these last salt
and saltpetre are mixed with the clay to make them more porous and so
increase their cooling capacity. A very useful thing is the small saucer which
serves as a lamp, being filled with oil on which a lighted wick is floated.
These saucers resemble those found in the excavations of Roman remains.
Earthen vessels are more commonly used, both for cooking and eating
purposes among the people of northern India, and especially by
Muhammadans, than among the Marāthas, and, as already noticed, the
Kumhār caste musters strong in the north of the Province. An earthen vessel
is polluted if any one of another caste takes food or drink from it and is at

Page 24

once discarded. On the occasion of a death all the vessels in the house are
thrown away and a new set obtained, and the same measure is adopted at the
Holi festival and on the occasion of an eclipse, and at various other
ceremonial purifications, such as that entailed if a member of the household
has had maggots in a wound. On this account cheapness is an indispensable
quality in pottery, and there is no opening for the Kumhār to improve his art.
Another product of the Kumhār’s industry is the chilam or pipe-bowl. This
has the usual opening for inhaling the smoke but no stem, an impromptu
stem being made by the hands and the smoke inhaled through it. As the
chilam is not touched by the mouth, Hindus of all except the impure castes
can smoke it together, passing it round, and Hindus can also smoke it with
Muhammadans.

It is a local belief that, if an earthen pot is filled with salt and plastered over,
the rains will stop until it is opened. This device is adopted when the fall is
excessive, but, on the other hand, if there is drought, the people sometimes
think that the potter has used it to keep off the rain, because he cannot pursue
his calling when the clay is very wet. And on occasions of a long break in
the rains, they have been known to attack his shop and break all his vessels
under the influence of this belief. The potter is sometimes known as
Prājapati or the ‘The Creator,’ in accordance with the favourite comparison
made by ancient writers of the moulding of his pots with the creation of
human beings, the justice of which will be recognised by any one who
watches the masses of mud on a whirling wheel growing into shapely vessels
in the potter’s creating hands.

6. Breeding pigs for sacrifices

Certain Kumhārs as well as the Dhīmars make the breeding of pigs a means
of subsistence, and they sell these pigs for sacrifices at prices varying from
eight annas (8d.) to a rupee. The pigs are sacrificed by the Gonds to their
god Bura Deo and by Hindus to the deity Bhainsāsur, or the buffalo demon,
for the protection of the crops. Bhainsāsur is represented by a stone in the

Page 25

fields, and when crops are beaten down at night by the wind it is supposed
that Bhainsāsur has passed over them and trampled them down. Hindus,
usually of the lower castes, offer pigs to Bhainsāsur to propitiate him and
preserve their crops from his ravages, but they cannot touch the impure pig
themselves. What they have to do, therefore, is to pay the Kumhār the price
of the pig and get him to offer it to Bhainsāsur on their behalf. The Kumhār
goes to the god and sacrifices the pig and then takes the body home and eats
it, so that his trade is a profitable one, while conversely to sacrifice a pig
without partaking of its flesh must necessarily be bitter to the frugal Hindu
mind, and this indicates the importance of the deity who is to be propitiated
by the offering. The first question which arises in connection with this
curious custom is why pigs should be sacrificed for the preservation of the
crops; and the reason appears to be that the wild pig is the animal which, at
present, mainly damages the crops.

7. The goddess Demeter

In ancient Greece pigs were offered to Demeter, the corn-goddess, for the
protection of the crops, and there is good reason to suppose that the
conceptions of Demeter herself and the lovely Proserpine grew out of the
worship of the pig, and that both goddesses were in the beginning merely the
deified pig. The highly instructive passage in which Sir J. G. Frazer
advances this theory is reproduced almost in full7: “Passing next to the corn-
goddess Demeter, and remembering that in European folklore the pig is a
common embodiment of the corn-spirit, we may now ask whether the pig,
which was so closely associated with Demeter, may not originally have been
the goddess herself in animal form? The pig was sacred to her; in art she was
portrayed carrying or accompanied by a pig; and the pig was regularly
sacrificed in her mysteries, the reason assigned being that the pig injures the
corn and is therefore an enemy of the goddess. But after an animal has been
conceived as a god, or a god as an animal, it sometimes happens, as we have
seen, that the god sloughs off his animal form and becomes purely
anthropomorphic; and that then the animal which at first had been slain in

Page 26

the character of the god, comes to be viewed as a victim offered to the god
on the ground of its hostility to the deity; in short, that the god is sacrificed
to himself on the ground that he is his own enemy. This happened to
Dionysus and it may have happened to Demeter also. And in fact the rites of
one of her festivals, the Thesmophoria, bear out the view that originally the
pig was an embodiment of the corn-goddess herself, either Demeter or her
daughter and double Proserpine. The Thesmophoria was an autumn festival
celebrated by women alone in October, and appears to have represented with
mourning rites the descent of Proserpine (or Demeter) into the lower world,
and with joy her return from the dead. Hence the name Descent or Ascent
variously applied to the first, and the name Kalligeneia (fair-born) applied to
the third day of the festival. Now from an old scholium on Lucian we learn
some details about the mode of celebrating the Thesmophoria, which shed
important light on the part of the festival called the Descent or the Ascent.
The scholiast tells us that it was customary at the Thesmophoria to throw
pigs, cakes of dough, and branches of pine-trees into ‘the chasms of Demeter
and Proserpine,’ which appear to have been sacred caverns or vaults.

“In these caverns or vaults there were said to be serpents, which guarded the
caverns and consumed most of the flesh of the pigs and dough-cakes which
were thrown in. Afterwards—apparently at the next annual festival—the
decayed remains of the pigs, the cakes, and the pine-branches were fetched
by women called ‘drawers,’ who, after observing, rules of ceremonial purity
for three days, descended into the caverns, and, frightening away the
serpents by clapping their hands, brought up the remains and placed them on
the altar. Whoever got a piece of the decayed flesh and cakes, and sowed it
with the seed-corn in his field, was believed to be sure of a good crop.

“To explain this rude and ancient rite the following legend was told. At the
moment when Pluto carried off Proserpine, a swineherd called Eubuleus
chanced to be herding his swine on the spot, and his herd was engulfed in the
chasm down which Pluto vanished with Proserpine. Accordingly, at the
Thesmophoria pigs were annually thrown into caverns to commemorate the
disappearance of the swine of Eubuleus. It follows from this that the casting
of the pigs into the vaults at the Thesmophoria formed part of the dramatic
representation of Proserpine’s descent into the lower world; and as no image

Page 27

of Proserpine appears to have been thrown in, we may infer that the descent
of the pigs was not so much an accompaniment of her descent as the descent
itself, in short, that the pigs were Proserpine. Afterwards, when Proserpine or
Demeter (for the two are equivalent) became anthropomorphic, a reason had
to be found for the custom of throwing pigs into caverns at her festival; and
this was done by saying that when Pluto carried off Proserpine, there
happened to be some swine browsing near, which were swallowed up along
with her. The story is obviously a forced and awkward attempt to bridge over
the gulf between the old conception of the corn-spirit as a pig and the new
conception of her as an anthropomorphic goddess. A trace of the older
conception survived in the legend that when the sad mother was searching
for traces of the vanished Proserpine, the footprints of the lost one were
obliterated by the footprints of a pig; originally, we may conjecture, the
footprints of the pig were the footprints of Proserpine and of Demeter
herself. A consciousness of the intimate connection of the pig with the corn
lurks in the legend that the swineherd Eubuleus was a brother of
Triptolemus, to whom Demeter first imparted the secret of the corn. Indeed,
according to one version of the story, Eubuleus himself received, jointly with
his brother Triptolemus, the gift of the corn from Demeter as a reward for
revealing to her the fate of Proserpine. Further, it is to be noted that at the
Thesmophoria the women appear to have eaten swine’s flesh. The meal, if I
am right, must have been a solemn sacrament or communion, the
worshippers partaking of the body of the god.”

8. Estimation of the pig in India

We thus see how the pig in ancient Greece was worshipped as a corn-deity
because it damaged the crops and subsequently became an anthropomorphic
goddess. It is suggested that pigs are offered to Bhainsāsur by the Hindus for
the same reason. But there is no Hindu deity representing the pig, this animal
on the contrary being regarded as impure. It seems doubtful, however,
whether this was always so. In Rājputāna on the stone which the Regent of
Kotah set up to commemorate the abolition of forced taxes were carved the

Page 28

effigies of the sun, the moon, the cow and the hog, with an imprecation on
whoever should revoke the edict.8 Colonel Tod says that the pig was
included as being execrated by all classes, but this seems very doubtful. It
would scarcely occur to any Hindu nowadays to associate the image of the
impure pig with those of the sun, moon and cow, the representations of three
of his greatest deities. Rather it gives some reason for supposing that the pig
was once worshipped, and the Rājpūts still do not hold the wild boar impure,
as they hunt it and eat its flesh. Moreover, Vishnu in his fourth incarnation
was a boar. The Gonds regularly offer pigs to their great god Bura Deo, and
though they now offer goats as well, this seems to be a later innovation. The
principal sacrifice of the early Romans was the Suovetaurilia or the sacrifice
of a pig, a ram and a bull. The order of the words, M. Reinach remarks,9 is
significant as showing the importance formerly attached to the pig or boar.
Since the pig was the principal sacrificial animal of the primitive tribes, the
Gonds and Baigas, its connection with the ritual of an alien and at one time
hostile religion may have strengthened the feeling of aversion for it among
the Hindus, which would naturally be engendered by its own dirty habits.

9. The buffalo as a corn-god

It seems possible then that the Hindus reverenced the wild boar in the past as
one of the strongest and fiercest animals of the forest and also as a destroyer
of the crops. And they still make sacrifices of the pig to guard their fields
from his ravages. These sacrifices, however, are not offered to any deity who
can represent a deified pig but to Bhainsāsur, the deified buffalo. The
explanation seems to be that in former times, when forests extended over
most of the country, the cultivator had in the wild buffalo a direr foe than the
wild pig. And one can well understand how the peasant, winning a scanty
subsistence from his poor fields near the forest, and seeing his harvest
destroyed in a night by the trampling of a herd of these great brutes against
whom his puny weapons were powerless, looked on them as terrible and
malignant deities. The sacrifice of a buffalo would be beyond the means of a
single man, and the animal is now more or less sacred as one of the cow

Page 29

tribe. But the annual joint sacrifice of one or more buffaloes is a regular
feature of the Dasahra festival and extends over a great part of India. In
Betūl and other districts the procedure is that on the Dasahra day, or a day
before, the Māng and Kotwār, two of the lowest village menials, take a
buffalo bull and bring it to the village proprietor, who makes a cut on its
nose and draws blood. Then it is taken all round the village and to the
shrines of the gods, and in the evening it is killed and the Māng and Kotwār
eat the flesh. It is now believed that if the blood of a buffalo does not fall at
Dasahra some epidemic will attack the village, but as there are no longer any
wild buffaloes except in the denser forests of one or two Districts, the
original meaning of the rite might naturally have been forgotten.10

10. The Dasahra festival

The Dasahra festival probably marks the autumnal equinox and also the time
when the sowing of wheat and other spring crops begins. Many Hindus still
postpone sowing the wheat until after Dasahra, even though it might be
convenient to begin before, especially as the festival goes by the lunar month
and its date varies in different years by more than a fortnight. The name
signifies the tenth day, and prior to the festival a fast of nine days is
observed, when the pots of wheat corresponding to the gardens of Adonis are
sown and quickly sprout up. This is an imitation of the sowing and growth of
the real crop and is meant to ensure its success. During these nine days it is
said that the goddess Devi was engaged in mortal combat with the buffalo
demon Mahisāsur or Bhainsāsur, and on the tenth day or the Dasahra she
slew him. The fast is explained as being observed in order to help her to
victory, but it is really perhaps a fast in connection with the growing of the
crops. A similar nine daysfast for the crops was observed by the Greeks.11

Page 30

11. The goddess Devi

Devi signifies ‘the goddess’ par excellence. She is often the tutelary goddess
of the village and of the family, and is held to have been originally Mother
Earth, which may be supposed to be correct. In tracts where the people of
northern and southern India meet she is identified with Anna Pūrna, the
corn-goddess of the Telugu country; and in her form of Gauri or ‘the Yellow
One’ she is perhaps herself the yellow corn. As Gauri she is worshipped at
weddings in conjunction with Ganesh or Ganpati, the god of Good Fortune;
and it is probably in honour of the harvest colour that Hindus of the upper
castes wear yellow at their weddings and consider it lucky. A Brahman also
prefers to wear yellow when eating his food. It has been seen12 that red is the
lucky colour of the lower castes of Hindus, and the reason probably is that
the shrines of their gods are stained red with the blood of the animals
sacrificed. High-caste Hindus no longer make animal sacrifices, and their
offerings to Siva, Vishnu and Devi consist of food, flowers and blades of
corn. Thus yellow would be similarly associated with the shrines of the gods.
All Hindu brides have their bodies rubbed with yellow turmeric, and the
principal religious flower, the marigold, is orange-yellow. Yellow is,
however, also lucky as being the colour of Vishnu or the Sun, and a yellow
flag is waved above his great temple at Rāmtek on the occasion of the fair.
Thus Devi as the corn-goddess perhaps corresponds to Demeter, but she is
not in this form an animal goddess. The Hindus worshipping Mother Earth,
as all races do in the early stage of religion, may by a natural and proper
analogy have ascribed the gift of the corn to her from whom it really comes,
and have identified her with the corn-goddess. This is by no means a full
explanation of the goddess Devi, who has many forms. As Pārvati, the hill-
maiden, and Durga, the inaccessible one, she is the consort of Siva in his
character of the mountain-god of the Himalayas; as Kāli, the devourer of
human flesh, she is perhaps the deified tiger; and she may have assimilated
yet more objects of worship into her wide divinity. But there seems no
special reason to hold that she is anywhere believed to be the deified buffalo;

Page 31

and the probable explanation of the Dasahra rite would therefore seem to be
that the buffalo was at first venerated as the corn-god because, like the pig in
Greece, he was most destructive to the crops, and a buffalo was originally
slaughtered and eaten sacramentally as an act of worship. At a later period
the divinity attaching to the corn was transferred to Devi, an
anthropomorphic deity of a higher class, and in order to explain the
customary slaughter of the buffalo, which had to be retained, the story
became current that the beneficent goddess fought and slew the buffalo-
demon which injured the crops, for the benefit of her worshippers, and the
fast was observed and the buffalo sacrificed in commemoration of this event.
It is possible that the sacrifice of the buffalo may have been a non-Aryan
rite, as the Mundas still offer a buffalo to Deswāli, their forest god, in the
sacred grove; and the Korwas of Sargūja nave periodical sacrifices to Kāli in
which many buffaloes are slaughtered. In the pictures of her fight with
Bhainsāsur, Devi is shown as riding on a tiger, and the uneducated might
imagine the struggle to have resembled that between a tiger and a buffalo. As
the destroyer of buffaloes and deer which graze on the crops the tiger may
even be considered the cultivator’s friend. But in the rural tracts Bhainsāsur
himself is still venerated in the guise of a corn-deity, and pig are perhaps
offered to him as the animals which nowadays do most harm to the crops.

1 Tribes and Castes of Bengal, art. Kumhār.

2 Gods and demons.
3 Hāth, hand and garhna to make or mould.

4 Gora, white or red, applied to Europeans.
5 History of the Marāthas, edition 1878, vol. i. p. 26.
6 The above description is taken from the Central Provinces Monograph on Pottery and Glassware
by Mr. Jowers, p. 4.
7 Golden Bough, ii. pp. 299, 301.

8 Rājasthān, ii. p. 524.
9 Orphèus, p. 152.

10 The sacrifice is now falling into abeyance, as landowners refuse to supply the buffalo.

Page 32

11 Dr. Jevons, Introduction to the History of Religion, p. 368.

12 Vide article on Lakhera.

Page 33

Kunbi
[This article is based on the information collected for the District Gazetteers
of the Central Provinces, manuscript notes furnished by Mr. A.K. Smith,
C.S., and from papers by Pandit Pyāre Lāl Misra and Munshi Kanhya Lāl.
The Kunbis are treated in the Poona and Khāndesh volumes of the Bombay
Gazetteer. The caste has been taken as typical of the Marāthi-speaking
Districts, and a fairly full description of the marriage and other ceremonies
has therefore been given, some information on houses, dress and food being
also reproduced from the Wardha and Yeotmal District Gazetteers.]

List of Paragraphs

1. Distribution of the caste and origin of name
2. Settlement in the Central Provinces
3. Subcastes
4. The cultivating status
5. Exogamus septs
6. Restrictions on marriage of relatives
7. Betrothal and marriage
8. Polygamy and divorce
9. Widow-marriage
10. Customs at birth
11. Sixth and twelfth day ceremonies
12. Devices for procuring children
13. Love charms
14. Disposal of the dead
15. Mourning
16. Religion
17. The Pola festival
18. Muhammadan tendencies of Berār Kunbis
19. Villages and houses
20. Furniture

Page 34

21. Food
22. Clothes and ornaments
23. The Kunbi as cultivator
24. Social and moral characteristics

1. Distribution of the caste and origin of name

Kunbi—The great agricultural caste of the Marātha country. In the Central
Provinces and Berār the Kunbis numbered nearly 1,400,000 persons in 1911;
they belong to the Nāgpur, Chānda, Bhandāra, Wardha, Nimār and Betūl
Districts of the Central Provinces. In Berār their strength was 800,000, or
nearly a third of the total population. Here they form the principal cultivating
class over the whole area except in the jungles of the north and south, but
muster most strongly in the Buldāna District to the west, where in some
tāluks nearly half the population belongs to the Kunbi caste. In the combined
Province they are the most numerous caste except the Gonds. The name has
various forms in Bombay, being Kunbi or Kulambi in the Deccan, Kulwādi
in the south Konkan, Kanbi in Gujarāt, and Kulbi in Belgaum. In Sanskrit
inscriptions it is given as Kutumbika (householder), and hence it has been
derived from kutumba, a family. A chronicle of the eleventh century quoted
by Forbes speaks of the Kutumbiks or cultivators of the grāms, or small
villages.1 Another writer describing the early Rājpūt dynasties says:2 “The
villagers were Koutombiks (householders) or husbandmen (Karshuks); the
village headmen were Putkeels (patels).” Another suggested derivation is
from a Dravidian root kul a husbandman or labourer; while that favoured by
the caste and their neighbours is from kun, a root, or kan grain, and bi, seed;
but this is too ingenious to be probable.

Page 35

Group of Kunbis

2. Settlement in the Central Provinces

It is stated that the Kunbis entered Khāndesh from Gujarāt in the eleventh
century, being forced to leave Gujarāt by the encroachments of Rājpūt tribes,
driven south before the early Muhammadan invaders of northern India.3
From Khāndesh they probably spread into Berār and the adjoining Nāgpur
and Wardha Districts. It seems probable that their first settlement in Nāgpur
and Wardha took place not later than the fourteenth century, because during
the subsequent period of Gond rule we find the offices of Deshmukh and
Deshpāndia in existence in this area. The Deshmukh was the manager or
headman of a circle of villages and was responsible for apportioning and

Page 36

collecting the land revenue, while the Deshpāndia was a head patwari or
accountant. The Deshmukhs were usually the leading Kunbis, and the titles
are still borne by many families in Wardha and Nāgpur. These offices4
belong to the Marātha country, and it seems necessary to suppose that their
introduction into Wardha and Berār dates from a period at least as early as
the fourteenth century, when these territories were included in the dominions
of the Bahmani kings of Bījapur. A subsequent large influx of Kunbis into
Wardha and Nāgpur took place in the eighteenth century with the conquest
of Raghūji Bhonsla and the establishment of the Marātha kingdom of
Nāgpur. Traces of these separate immigrations survive in the subdivisions of
the caste, which will now be mentioned.

3. Subcastes

The internal structure of the Kunbi caste in the Central Provinces shows that
it is a mixed occupational body recruited from different classes of the
population. The Jhāre or jungly5 Kunbis are the oldest immigrants and have
no doubt an admixture of Gond blood. They do not break their earthen
vessels after a death in the house. With them may be classed the Mānwa
Kunbis of the Nāgpur District; these appear to be a group recruited from the
Mānas, a primitive tribe who were dominant in Chānda perhaps even before
the advent of the Gonds. The Mānwa Kunbi women wear their cloths drawn
up so as to expose the thigh like the Gonds, and have some other primitive
practices. They do not employ Brāhmans at their marriages, but consult a
Mahār Mohtūria or soothsayer to fix the date of the ceremony. Other Kunbis
will not eat with the Mānwas, and the latter retaliate in the usual manner by
refusing to accept food from them; and say that they are superior to other
Kunbis because they always use brass vessels for cooking and not earthen
ones. Among the other subcastes in the Central Provinces are the Khaire,
who take their name from the khaīr6 or catechu tree, presumably because
they formerly prepared catechu; this is a regular occupation of the forest
tribes, with whom it may be supposed that the Khaire have some affinity.
The Dhanoje are those who took to the occupation of tending dhan7 or small

Page 37

stock, and they are probably an offshoot of the Dhangar or shepherd caste
whose name is similarly derived. Like the Dhangar women they wear
cocoanut-shell bangles, and the Mānwa Kunbis also do this; these bangles
are not broken when a child is born, and hence the Dhanojes and Mānwas
are looked down on by the other subcastes, who refuse to remove their leaf-
plates after a feast. The name of the Khedule subcaste may be derived from
kheda a village, while another version given by Mr. Kitts8 is that it signifies
‘A beardless youth.’ The highest subcaste in the Central Provinces are the
Tirole or Tilole, who now claim to be Rājpūts. They say that their ancestors
came from Therol in Rājputāna, and, taking to agriculture, gradually became
merged with the Kunbis. Another more probable derivation of the name is
from the til or sesamum plant. The families who held the hereditary office of
Deshmukh, which conferred a considerable local position, were usually
members of the Tirole subcaste, and they have now developed into a sort of
aristocratic branch of the caste, and marry among themselves when matches
can be arranged. They do not allow the remarriage of widows nor permit
their women to accompany the wedding procession. The Wāndhekars are
another group which also includes some Deshmukh families, and ranks next
to the Tiroles in position. Mr. Kitts records a large number of subcastes in
Berār.9 Among them are some groups from northern India, as the Hindustāni,
Pardesi, Dholewār, Jaiswār and Singrore; these are probably Kurmis who
have settled in Berār and become amalgamated with the Kunbis. Similarly
the Tailanges and Munurwārs appear to be an offshoot of the great Kāpu
caste of cultivators in the Telugu country. The Wanjāri subcaste is a fairly
large one and almost certainly represents a branch of the Banjāra caste of
carriers, who have taken to agriculture and been promoted into the Kunbi
community. The Lonhāre take their name from Lonār Mehkar, the well-
known bitter lake of the Buldāna District, whose salt they may formerly
have refined. The Ghātole are those who dwelt above the ghāts or passes of
the Saihadri range to the south of the Berār plain. The Baone are an
important subcaste both in Berār and the Central Provinces, and take their
name from the phrase Bāwan Berār,10 a term applied to the province by the
Mughals because it paid fifty-two lakhs of revenue, as against only eight
lakhs realised from the adjoining Jhādi or hill country in the Central
Provinces. In Chhindwāra is found a small local subcaste called Gādhao
because they formerly kept donkeys, though they no longer do so; they are

Page 38

looked down on by the others who will not even take water from their hands.
In Nimār is a group of Gujarāti Kunbis who are considered to have been
originally Gūjars.11 Their local subdivisions are Leve and Karwa and many
of them are also known as Dālia, because they made the dāl or pulse of
Burhānpur, which had a great reputation under native rule. It is said that it
was formerly despatched daily to Sindhia’s kitchen.

4. The cultivating status

It appears then that a Kunbi has in the past been synonymous with a
cultivator, and that large groups from other castes have taken to agriculture,
have been admitted into the community and usually obtained a rise in rank.
In many villages Kunbis are the only ryots, while below them are the village
menials and artisans, several of whom perform functions at weddings or on
other occasions denoting their recognition of the Kunbi as their master or
employer; and beneath these again are the impure Mahārs or labourers. Thus
at a Kunbi betrothal the services of the barber and washerman must be
requisitioned; the barber washes the feet of the boy and girl and places
vermilion on the foreheads of the guests. The washerman spreads a sheet on
the ground on which the boy and girl sit. At the end of the ceremony the
barber and washerman take the bride and bridegroom on their shoulders and
dance to music in the marriage-shed; for this they receive small presents.
After a death has occurred at a Kunbi’s house the impurity is not removed
until the barber and washerman have eaten in it. At a Kunbi’s wedding the
Gurao or village priest brings the leafy branches of five trees, the mango,
jāmun12 umar13 and two others and deposits them at Māroti’s temple,
whence they are removed by the parents of the bride. Before a wedding
again a Kunbi bride must go to the potter’s house and be seated on his wheel
while it is turned round seven times for good luck. At seed-time and harvest
all the village menials go to the cultivator’s field and present him with a
specimen of their wares or make obeisance to him, receiving in return a
small present of grain. This state of things seems to represent the primitive
form of Hindu society from which the present widely ramified system, of

Page 39

castes may have expanded, and even now the outlines of the original
structure may be discernible under all subsequent accretions.

5. Exogamus septs

Each subcaste has a number of exogamous septs or clans which serve as a
table of affinities in regulating marriage. The vernacular term for these is
kul. Some of the septs are named after natural objects or animals, others
from titles or nicknames borne by the reputed founder of the group, or from
some other caste to which he may have belonged, while others again are
derived from the names of villages which maybe taken to have been the
original home of the sept or clan. The following are some septs of the Tirole
subcaste: Kole, jackal; Wānkhede, a village; Kadu, bitter; Jagthāp, famous;
Kadam, a tree; Meghe, a cloud; Lohekari, a worker in iron; Ughde, a child
who has been exposed at birth; Shinde, a palm-tree; Hagre, one who suffers
from diarrhoea; Aglāwe, an incendiary; Kalamkār, a writer; Wāni (Bania), a
caste; Sutār, a carpenter, and so on, A few of the groups of the Bāone
subcaste are:—Kāntode, one with a torn ear; Dokarmāre, a killer of pigs;
Lūte, a plunderer; Titarmāre, a pigeon-killer; and of the Khedule: Patre, a
leaf-plate; Ghoremāre, one who killed a horse; Bāgmare, a tiger-slayer;
Gadhe, a donkey; Burāde, one of the Burud or Basor caste; Nāktode, one
with a broken nose, and so on. Each subcaste has a number of septs, a total
of 66 being recorded for the Tiroles alone. The names of the septs confirm
the hypothesis arrived at from a scrutiny of the subcastes that the Kunbis are
largely recruited from the pre-Aryan or aboriginal tribes. Conclusions as to
the origin of the caste can better be made in its home in Bombay, but it may
be noted that in Canara, according to the accomplished author of A
Naturalist on the Prowl14 the Kunbi is quite a primitive forest-dweller, who
only a few years back lived by scattering his seed on patches of land burnt
clear of vegetation, collecting myrobalans and other fruits, and snaring and
trapping animals exactly like the Gonds and Baigas of the Central Provinces.
Similarly in Nāsik it is stated that a large proportion of the Kunbi caste are
probably derived from the primitive tribes15. Yet in the cultivated plains

Page 40

which he has so largely occupied, he is reckoned the equal in rank of the
Kurmi and other cultivating castes of Hindustān, who in theory at any rate
are of Aryan origin and of so high a grade of social purity that Brāhmans
will take water from them. The only reasonable explanation of this rise in
status appears to be that the Kunbi has taken possession of the land and has
obtained the rank which from time immemorial belongs to the hereditary
cultivator as a member and citizen of the village community. It is interesting
to note that the Wanjāri Kunbis of Berār, who, being as already seen
Banjāras, are of Rājpūt descent at any rate, now strenuously disclaim all
connection with the Banjāra caste and regard their reception into the Kunbi
community as a gain in status. At the same time the refusal of the Marātha
Brāhmans to take water to drink from Kunbis may perhaps have been due to
the recognition of their non-Aryan origin. Most of the Kunbis also eat fowls,
which the cultivating castes of northern India would not usually do.

6. Restrictions on marriage of relatives

A man is forbidden to marry within his own sept or kul, or in that of his
mother or either of his grandmothers. He may marry his wife’s younger
sister but not her elder sister. Alliances between first and second cousins are
also prohibited except that a sister’s son may be married to a brother’s
daughter. Such marriages are also favoured by the Marātha Brāhmans and
other castes, and the suitability of the match is expressed in the saying Ato
ghari bhāsi sūn, or ‘At a sister’s house her brother’s daughter is a daughter-
in-law.’ The sister claims it as a right and not unfrequently there are quarrels
if the brother decides to give his daughter to somebody else, while the
general feeling is so strongly in favour of these marriages that the caste
committee sometimes imposes a fine on fathers who wish to break through
the rule. The fact that in this single case the marriage of near relatives is not
only permitted but considered almost as an obligation, while in all other
instances it is strictly prohibited, probably points to the conclusion that the
custom is a survival of the matriarchate, when a brother’s property would
pass to his sister’s son. Under such a law of inheritance he would naturally

Page 41

desire that his heir should be united to his own daughter, and this union
might gradually become customary and at length almost obligatory. The
custom in this case may survive when the reasons which justified it have
entirely vanished. And while formerly it was the brother who would have
had reason to desire the match for his daughter, it is now the sister who
insists on it for her son, the explanation being that among the Kunbis as with
other agricultural castes, to whom a wife’s labour is a valuable asset, girls
are expensive and a considerable price has to be paid for a bride.

7. Betrothal and marriage

Girls are usually married between the ages of five and eleven and boys
between ten and twenty. The Kunbis still think it a mark of social distinction
to have their daughters married as young as possible. The recognised bride-
price is about twenty rupees, but much larger sums are often paid. The boy’s
father goes in search of a girl to be married to his son, and when the bride-
price has been settled and the match arranged the ceremony of Māngni or
betrothal takes place. In the first place the boy’s father proceeds to his future
daughter-in-law’s house, where he washes her feet, smears her forehead with
red powder and gives her a present of a rupee and some sweetmeats. All the
party then eat together. This is followed by a visit of the girl’s father to the
boy’s house where a similar ceremony is enacted and the boy is presented
with a cocoanut, a pagri and cloth, and a silver or gold ring. Again the boy’s
relatives go to the girl’s house and give her more valuable presents of
jewellery and clothing. A Brāhman is afterwards consulted to fix the date of
the marriage, but the poorer Kunbis dispense with his services as he charges
two or three rupees. Prior to the ceremony the bodies of the bride and
bridegroom are well massaged with vegetable oil and turmeric in their
respective houses, partly with a view to enhance their beauty and also
perhaps to protect them during the trying period of the ceremony when
maleficent spirits are particularly on the alert. The marriage-shed is made of
eleven poles festooned with leaves, and inside it are placed two posts of the
sāleh (Boswellia serrata) or umar (Ficus glomerata) tree, one longer than

Page 42

the other, to represent the bride and bridegroom. Two jars filled with water
are set near the posts, and a small earthen platform called baola is made. The
bridegroom wears a yellow or white dress, and has a triangular frame of
bamboo covered with tinsel over his forehead, which is known as bāsing and
is a substitute for the maur or marriage-crown of the Hindustāni castes. Over
his shoulder he carries a pickaxe as the representative implement of
husbandry with one or two wheaten cakes tied to it. This is placed on the top
of the marriage-shed and at the end of the five days’ ceremonies the
members of the families eat the dried cakes with milk, no outsider being
allowed to participate. The barāt or wedding procession sets out for the
bride’s village, the women of the bridegroom’s family accompanying it
except among the Tirole Kunbis, who forbid the practice in order to
demonstrate their higher social position. It is received on the border of the
girl’s village by her father and his friends and relatives, and conducted to the
janwāsa or temporary lodging prepared for it, with the exception of the
bridegroom, who is left alone before the shrine of Māroti or Hanumān. The
bridegroom’s father goes to the marriage-shed where he washes the bride’s
feet and gives her another present of clothes, and her relatives then proceed
to Māroti’s temple where they worship and make offerings, and return
bringing the bridegroom with them. As he arrives at the marriage pavilion he
touches it with a stick, on which the bride’s brother who is seated above the
shed pours down some water and is given a present of money by the
bridegroom. The bridegroom’s feet are then washed by his father-in-law and
he is given a yellow cloth which he wears. The couple are made to stand on
two wooden planks opposite each other with a curtain between them, the
bridegroom facing east and the bride west, holding some Akshata or rice
covered with saffron in their hands. As the sun sets the officiating Brāhman
gets on to the roof of the house and repeats the marriage texts from there. At
his signal the couple throw the rice over each other, the curtain between
them is withdrawn, and they change their seats. The assembled party
applaud and the marriage proper is over. The Brāhman marks their foreheads
with rice and turmeric and presses them together. He then seats them on the
earthen platform or baola, and ties their clothes together, this being known
as the Brahma Gānthi or Brāhman’s knot. The wedding usually takes place
on the day after the arrival of the marriage procession and another two days
are consumed in feasting and worshipping the deities. When the bride and

Page 43

bridegroom return home after the wedding one of the party waves a pot of
water round their heads and throws it away at a little distance on the ground,
and after this some grain in the same manner. This is a provision of food and
drink to any evil spirits who may be hovering round the couple, so that they
may stop to consume it and refrain from entering the house. The expenses of
the bride’s family may vary from Rs. 60 to Rs. 100 and those of the
bridegroom’s from Rs. 160 to Rs. 600. A wedding carried out on a lavish
scale by a well-to-do man is known as Lāl Biāh or a red marriage, but when
the parties are poor the expenses are curtailed and it is then called Safed
Biāh or a white marriage. In this case the bridegroom’s mother does not
accompany the wedding procession and the proceedings last only two days.
The bride goes back with the wedding procession for a few days to her
husband’s house and then returns home. When she arrives at maturity her
parents give a feast to the caste and send her to her husband’s house, this
occasion being known as Bolvan (the calling). The Karwa Kunbis of Nimār
have a peculiar rule for the celebration of marriages. They have a guru or
priest in Gujarāt who sends them a notice once in every ten or twelve years,
and in this year only marriages can be performed. It is called Singhast ki sāl
and is the year in which the planet Guru (Jupiter) comes into conjunction
with the constellation Sinh (Leo). But the Karwas themselves think that there
is a large temple in Gujarāt with a locked door to which there is no key. But
once in ten or twelve years the door unlocks of itself, and in that year their
marriages are celebrated. A certain day is fixed and all the weddings are held
on it together. On this occasion children from infants in arms to ten or twelve
years are married, and if a match cannot be arranged for them they will have
to wait another ten or twelve years. A girl child who is born on the day fixed
for weddings may, however, be married twelve days afterwards, the twelfth
night being called Māndo Rāt, and on this occasion any other weddings
which may have been unavoidably postponed owing to a death or illness in
the families may also be completed. The rule affords a loophole of escape
for the victims of any such contretemps and also insures that every girl shall
be married before she is fully twelve years old. Rather than not marry their
daughter in the Singhast ki sāl before she is twelve the parents will accept
any bridegroom, even though he be very poor or younger than the bride.
This is the same year in which the celebration of marriages is forbidden
among the Hindus generally. The other Kunbis have the general Hindu rule

Page 44

that weddings are forbidden during the four months from the 11th Asārh
Sudi (June) to the 11th Kārtik Sudi (October). This is the period of the rains,
when the crops are growing and the gods are said to go to sleep, and it is
observed more or less as a time of abstinence and fasting. The Hindus should
properly abstain from eating sugarcane, brinjals, onions, garlic and other
vegetables for the whole four months. On the 12th of Kārtik the marriage of
Tulsi or the basil plant with the Sāligrām or ammonite representing Vishnu is
performed and all these vegetables are offered to her and afterwards
generally consumed. Two days afterwards, beginning from the 14th of
Kārtik, comes the Diwāli festival. In Betūl the bridal couple are seated in the
centre of a square made of four plough yokes, while a leaf of the pīpal tree
and a piece of turmeric are tied by a string round both their wrists. The
untying of the string by the local Brāhman constitutes the essential and
binding portion of the marriage. Among the Lonhāre subcaste a curious
ceremony is performed after the wedding. A swing is made, and a round
pestle, which is supposed to represent a child, is placed on it and swung to
and fro. It is then taken off and placed in the lap of the bride, and the effect
of performing this symbolical ceremony is supposed to be that she will soon
become a mother.

8. Polygamy and divorce

Polygamy is permitted but rarely practised, a second wife being only taken if
the first be childless or of bad character, or destitute of attractions. Divorce is
allowed, but in some localities at any rate a divorced woman cannot marry
again unless she is permitted to do so in writing by her first husband. If a girl
be seduced before marriage a fine is imposed on both parties and they are
readmitted to social intercourse, but are not married to each other. Curiously
enough, in the Tirole and Wāndhekar, the highest subcastes, the keeping of a
woman is not an offence entailing temporary exclusion from caste, whereas
among the lower subcastes it is.16

Page 45

9. Widow-marriage

The Kunbis permit the remarriage of widows, with the exception of the
Deshmukh families of the Tirole subcaste who have forbidden it. If a
woman’s husband dies she returns to her father’s house and he arranges her
second marriage, which is called choli-pātal, or giving her new clothes. He
takes a price for her which may vary from twenty-five to five hundred
rupees according to the age and attractions of the woman. A widow may
marry any one outside the family of her deceased husband, but she may not
marry his younger brother. This union, which among the Hindustāni castes is
looked upon as most suitable if not obligatory, is strictly forbidden among
the Marātha castes, the reason assigned being that a wife stands in the
position of a mother to her husband’s younger brothers. The contrast is
curious. The ceremony of widow-marriage is largely governed by the idea of
escaping or placating the wrath of the first husband’s ghost, and also of its
being something to be ashamed of and contrary to orthodox Hinduism. It
always takes place in the dark fortnight of the month and always at night.
Sometimes no women are present, and if any do attend they must be
widows, as it would be the worst of omens for a married woman or
unmarried girl to witness the ceremony. This, it is thought, would lead to her
shortly becoming a widow herself. The bridegroom goes to the widow’s
house with his male friends and two wooden seats are set side by side. On
one of these a betel-nut is placed which represents the deceased husband of
the widow. The new bridegroom advances with a small wooden sword,
touches the nut with its tip, and then kicks it off the seat with his right toe.
The barber picks up the nut and burns it. This is supposed to lay the
deceased husband’s spirit and prevent his interference with the new union.
The bridegroom then takes the seat from which the nut has been displaced
and the woman sits on the other side to his left. He puts a necklace of beads
round her neck and the couple leave the house in a stealthy fashion and go to
the husband’s village. It is considered unlucky to see them as they go away
because the second husband is regarded in the light of a robber. Sometimes

Page 46

they stop by a stream on the way home, and, taking off the woman’s clothes
and bangles, bury them by the side of the stream. An exorcist may also be
called in, who will confine the late husband’s spirit in a horn by putting in
some grains of wheat, and after sealing up the horn deposit it with the
clothes. When a widower or widow marries a second time and is afterwards
attacked by illness, it is ascribed to the illwill of their former partner’s spirit.
The metal image of the first husband or wife is then made and worn as an
amulet on the arm or round the neck. A bachelor who wishes to marry a
widow must first go through a mock ceremony with an ākra or swallow-wort
plant, as the widow-marriage is not considered a real one, and it is
inauspicious for any one to die without having been properly married once.
A similar ceremony must be gone through when a man is married for the
third time, as it is held that if he marries a woman for the third time he will
quickly die. The ākra or swallow-wort (Calotropis gigantea) is a very
common plant growing on waste land with mauve or purple flowers. When
cut or broken a copious milky juice exudes from the stem, and in some
places parents are said to poison children whom they do not desire to keep
alive by rubbing this on their lips.

10. Customs at birth

During her monthly impurity a woman stays apart and may not cook for
herself nor touch anybody nor sleep on a bed made of cotton thread. As soon
as she is in this condition she will untie the cotton threads confining her hair
and throw them away, letting her hair hang down. This is because they have
become impure. But if there is no other woman in the house and she must
continue to do the household work herself, she does not throw them away
until the last day.17 Similarly she must not sleep on a cotton sheet or mattress
during this time because she would defile it, but she may sleep on a woollen
blanket as wool is a holy material and is not defiled. At the end of the period
she proceeds to a stream and purifies herself by bathing and washing her
head with earth. When a woman is with child for the first time her women
friends come and give her new green clothes and bangles in the seventh

Page 47

month; they then put her into a swing and sing songs. While she is pregnant
she is made to work in the house so as not to be inactive. After the birth of a
child the mother remains impure for twelve days. A woman of the Māng or
Mahār caste acts as midwife, and always breaks her bangles and puts on new
ones after she has assisted at a birth. If delivery is prolonged the woman is
given hot water and sugar or camphor wrapped in a betel-leaf, or they put a
few grains of gram into her hand and then someone takes and feeds them to
a mare, as it is thought that the woman’s pregnancy has been prolonged by
her having walked behind the tethering-ropes of a mare, which is twelve
months in foal. Or she is given water to drink in which a Sulaimāni onyx or
a rupee of Akbar’s time has been washed; in the former case the idea is
perhaps that a passage will be made for the child like the hole through the
bead, while the virtue of the rupee probably consists in its being a silver coin
and having the image or device of a powerful king like Akbar. Or it may be
thought that as the coin has passed from hand to hand for so long, it will
facilitate the passage of the child from the womb. A pregnant woman must
not look on a dead body or her child may be still-born, and she must not see
an eclipse or the child may be born maimed. Some believe that if a child is
born during an eclipse it will suffer from lung-disease; so they make a silver
model of the moon while the eclipse lasts and hang it round the child’s neck
as a charm. Sometimes when delivery is delayed they take a folded flower
and place it in a pot of water and believe that as its petals unfold so the
womb will be opened and the child born; or they seat the woman on a
wooden bench and pour oil on her head, her forehead being afterwards
rubbed with it in the belief that as the oil falls so the child will be born. If a
child is a long time before learning to speak they give it leaves of the pīpal
tree to eat, because the leaves of this tree make a noise by rustling in the
wind; or a root which is very light in weight, because they think that the
tongue is heavy and the quality of lightness will thus be communicated to it.
Or the mother, when she has kneaded dough and washed her hands
afterwards, will pour a drop or two of the water down the child’s throat. And
the water which made her hands clean and smooth will similarly clear the
child’s throat of the obstruction which prevented it from speaking. If a
child’s neck is weak and its head rolls about they make it look at a crow
perching on the house and think this will make its neck strong like the
crow’s. If he cannot walk they make a little triangle on wheels with a pole

Page 48

called ghurghuri, and make him walk holding on to the pole. The first teeth
of the child are thrown on to the roof of the house, because the rats, who
have especially good and sharp teeth, live there, and it is hoped that the
child’s second teeth may grow like theirs. A few grains of rice are also
thrown so that the teeth may be hard and pointed like the rice; the same
word, kani, being used for the end of a grain of rice and the tip of a tooth. Or
the teeth are placed under a water-pot in the hope that the child’s second
teeth may grow as fast as the grass does under water-pots. If a child is lean
some people take it to a place where asses have lain down and rolled in
ashes; they roll the child in the ashes similarly and believe that it will get fat
like the asses are. Or they may lay the child in a pigsty with the same idea.
People who want to injure a child get hold of its coat and lay it out in the sun
to dry, in the belief that the child’s body will dry up in a similar manner. In
order to avert the evil eye they burn some turmeric and juāri flour and hold
the newly-born child in the smoke. It is also branded on the stomach with a
burning piece of turmeric, perhaps to keep off cold. For the first day or two
after birth a child is given cow’s milk mixed with water or honey and a little
castor oil, and after this it is suckled by the mother. But if she is unable to
nourish it a wet-nurse is called in, who may be a woman of low caste or even
a Muhammadan. The mother is given no regular food for the first two days,
but only some sugar and spices. Until the child is six months old its head and
body are oiled every second or third day and the body is well hand-rubbed
and bathed. The rubbing is meant to make the limbs supple and the oil to
render the child less susceptible to cold. If a child when sitting soon after
birth looks down through its legs they think it is looking for its companions
whom it has left behind and that more children will be born. It is considered
a bad sign if a child bites its upper teeth on its underlip; this is thought to
prognosticate illness and the child is prevented from doing so as far as
possible.

11. Sixth and twelfth day ceremonies

Page 49

On the sixth day after birth they believe that Chhathi or Satwai Devi, the
Sixth-day Goddess, comes at midnight and writes on the child’s forehead its
fate in life, which writing, it is said, may be seen on a man’s skull when the
flesh has come off it after death. On this night the women of the family stay
awake all night singing songs and eating sweetmeats. A picture of the
goddess is drawn with turmeric and vermilion over the mother’s bed. The
door of the birth-room is left open, and at midnight she comes. Sometimes a
Sunār is employed to make a small image of Chhathi Devi, for which he is
paid Rs. 1–4, and it is hung round the child’s neck. On this day the mother is
given to eat all kinds of grain, and among flesh-eating castes the soup of fish
and meat, because it is thought that every kind of food which the mother eats
this day will be easily digested by the child throughout its life. On this day
the mother is given a second bath, the first being on the day of the birth, and
she must not bathe in between. Sometimes after childbirth a woman buys
several bottles of liquor and has a bath in it; the stimulating effect of the
spirit is supposed to remedy the distension of the body caused by the birth. If
the child is a boy it is named on the twelfth and if a girl on the thirteenth day.
On the twelfth day the mother’s bangles are thrown away and new ones put
on. The Kunbis are very kind to their children, and never harsh or quick-
tempered, but this may perhaps be partly due to their constitutional lethargy.
They seldom refuse a child anything, but taking advantage of its innocence
will by dissimulation make it forget what it wanted. The time arrives when
this course of conduct is useless, and then the child learns to mistrust the
word of its parents. Minute quantities of opium are generally administered to
children as a narcotic.

12. Devices for procuring children

If a woman is barren and has no children one of the remedies prescribed by
the Sarodis or wandering soothsayers is that she should set fire to
somebody’s house, going alone and at night to perform the deed. So long as
some small part of the house is burnt it does not matter if the fire be
extinguished, but the woman should not give the alarm herself. It is

Page 50

supposed that the spirit of some insect which is burnt will enter her womb
and be born as a child. Perhaps she sets fire to someone else’s house so as to
obtain the spirit of one of the family’s dead children, which may be supposed
to have entered the insects dwelling on the house. Some years ago at
Bhāndak in Chānda complaints were made of houses being set on fire. The
police officer18 sent to investigate found that other small fires continued to
occur. He searched the roofs of the houses, and on two or three found little
smouldering balls of rolled-up cloth. Knowing of the superstition he called
all the childless married women of the place together and admonished them
severely, and the fires stopped. On another occasion the same officer’s wife
was ill, and his little son, having fever, was sent daily to the dispensary for
medicine in charge of a maid. One morning he noticed on one of the soles of
the boy’s feet a stain of the juice of the bhilawa19 or marking-nut tree, which
raises blisters on the skin. On looking at the other foot he found six similar
marks, and on inquiry he learned that these were made by a childless woman
in the expectation that the boy would soon die and be born again as her
child. The boy suffered no harm, but his mother, being in bad health, nearly
died of shock on learning of the magic practised against her son.

Another device is to make a pradakshana or pilgrimage round a pīpal tree,
going naked at midnight after worshipping Māroti or Hanumān, and holding
a necklace of tulsi beads in the hand. The pīpal is of course a sacred tree, and
is the abode of Brahma, the original creator of the world. Brahma has no
consort, and it is believed that while all other trees are both male and female
the pīpal is only male, and is capable of impregnating a woman and
rendering her fertile. A variation of this belief is that pīpal trees are inhabited
by the spirits of unmarried Brāhman boys, and hence a woman sometimes
takes a piece of new thread and winds it round the tree, perhaps with the idea
of investing the spirit of the boy with the sacred thread. She will then walk
round the tree as a symbol of the wedding ceremony of walking round the
sacred post, and hopes that the boy, being thus brought to man’s estate and
married, will cause her to bear a son. But modest women do not go naked
round the tree. The Amawas or New Moon day, if it falls on a Monday, is
specially observed by married women. On this day they will walk 108 times
round a pīpal tree, and then give 108 mangoes or other fruits to a Brahman,
choosing a different fruit every time. The number 108 means a hundred and

Page 51

a little more to show there is no stint, ‘Full measure and flowing over,’ like
the customary present of Rs. 1–4 instead of a rupee. This is also no doubt a
birth-charm, fruit being given so that the woman may become fruitful. Or a
childless woman will pray to Hanumān or Mahābir. Every morning she will
go to his shrine with an offering of fruit or flowers, and every evening will
set a lamp burning there; and morning and evening, prostrating herself, she
makes her continuous prayer to the god: ‘Oh, Mahābīr, Mahārāj! hamko ek
batcha do, sirf ek batcha do.’20 Then, after many days, Mahābir, as might be
anticipated, appears to her in a dream and promises her a child. It does not
seem that they believe that Mahabir himself directly renders the woman
fertile, because similar prayers are made to the River Nerbudda, a goddess.
But perhaps he, being the god of strength, lends virile power to her husband.
Another prescription is to go to the burying-ground, and, after worshipping
it, to take some of the bone-ash of a burnt corpse and wear this wrapped up
in an amulet on the body. Occasionally, if a woman can get no children she
will go to the father of a large family and let him beget a child upon her, with
or without the connivance of her husband. But only the more immodest
women do this. Or she cuts a piece off the breast-cloth of a woman who has
children, and, after burning incense on it, wears it as an amulet For a
stronger charm she will take a piece of such a woman’s cloth and a lock of
her hair and some earth which her feet have pressed and bury these in a pot
before Devi’s shrine, sometimes fashioning an image of the woman out of
them. Then, as they rot away, the child-bearing power of the fertile woman
will be transferred to her. If a woman’s first children have died and she
wishes to preserve a later one, she sometimes weighs the child against sugar
or copper and distributes the amount in charity. Or she gives the child a bad
name, such as Dagharia (a stone), Kachria (sweepings), Ukandia (a
dunghill).

13. Love charms

If a woman’s husband is not in love with her, a prescription of a Mohani or
love-charm given by the wise women is that she should kill an owl and serve

Page 52

some of its flesh to her husband as a charm. “It has not occurred,” Mr.
Kipling writes, “to the oriental jester to speak of a boiled owl in connection
with intoxication, but when a husband is abjectly submissive to his wife her
friends say that she has given him boiled owl’s flesh to eat.”21 If a man is in
love with some woman and wishes to kindle a similar sentiment in her the
following method is given: On a Saturday night he should go to a graveyard
and call out, ‘I am giving a dinner tomorrow night, and I invite you all to
attend.’ Then on the Sunday night he takes cocoanuts, sweetmeats, liquor
and flowers to the cemetery and sets them all out, and all the spirits or
Shaitans come and partake. The host chooses a particularly big Shaitan and
calls to him to come near and says to him, ‘Will you go with me and do what
I ask you.’ If the spirit assents he follows the man home. Next night the man
again offers cocoanuts and incense to the Shaitan, whom he can see by night
but not by day, and tells him to go to the woman’s house and call her. Then
the spirit goes and troubles her heart, so that she falls in love with the man
and has no rest till she goes to him. If the man afterwards gets tired of her he
will again secretly worship and call up the Shaitan and order him to turn the
woman’s inclination away. Another method is to fetch a skull from a
graveyard and go to a banyan tree at midnight. There, divesting himself of
his clothes, the operator partially cooks some rice in the skull, and then
throws it against the tree; he gathers all the grains that stick to the trunk in
one box and those that fall to the ground in another box, and the first rice
given to the woman to eat will turn her inclination towards him, while the
second will turn it away from him. This is a sympathetic charm, the rice
which sticks to the tree having the property of attracting the woman.

14. Disposal of the dead

The Kunbis either bury or burn the dead. In Berār sepulture is the more
common method of disposal, perhaps in imitation of the Muhammadans.
Here the village has usually a field set apart for the disposal of corpses,
which is known as Smashān. Hindus fill up the earth practically level with
the ground after burial and erect no monument, so that after a few years

Page 53

another corpse can be buried in the same place. When a Kunbi dies the body
is washed in warm water and placed on a bier made of bamboos, with a
network of san-hemp.22 Ordinary rope must not be used. The mourners then
take it to the grave, scattering almonds, sandalwood, dates, betel-leaf and
small coins as they go. These are picked up by the menial Mahārs or
labourers. Halfway to the grave the corpse is set down and the bearers
change their positions, those behind going in front. Here a little wheat and
pulse which have been tied in the cloth covering the corpse are left by the
way. On the journey to the grave the body is covered with a new unwashed
cloth. The grave is dug three or four feet deep, and the corpse is buried
naked, lying on its back with the head to the south. After the burial one of
the mourners is sent to get an earthen pot from the Kurnhār; this is filled
with water at a river or stream, and a small piece is broken out of it with a
stone; one of the mourners then takes the pot and walks round the corpse
with it, dropping a stream of water all the way. Having done this, he throws
the pot behind him over his shoulder without looking round, and then all the
mourners go home without looking behind them. The stone with which the
hole has been made in the earthen pot is held to represent the spirit of the
deceased. It is placed under a tree or on the bank of a stream, and for ten
days the mourners come and offer it pindas or balls of rice, one ball being
offered on the first day, two on the second, and so on, up to ten on the tenth.
On this last day a little mound of earth is made, which is considered to
represent Mahādeo. Four miniature flags are planted round, and three cakes
of rice are laid on it; and all the mourners sit round the mound until a crow
comes and eats some of the cake. Then they say that the dead man’s spirit
has been freed from troubling about his household and mundane affairs and
has departed to the other world. But if no real crow comes to eat the cake,
they make a representation of one out of the sacred kusha grass, and touch
the cake with it and consider that a crow has eaten it. After this the mourners
go to a stream and put a little cow’s urine on their bodies, and dip ten times
in the water or throw it over them. The officiating Brāhman sprinkles them
with holy water in which he has dipped the toe of his right foot, and they
present to the Brāhman the vessels in which the funeral cakes have been
cooked and the clothes which the chief mourner has worn for ten days. On
coming home they also give him a stick, umbrella, shoes, a bed and anything
else which they think the dead man will want in the next world. On the

Page 54

thirteenth day they feed the caste-fellows and the head of the caste ties a new
pagri on the chief mourner’s head backside foremost; and the chief mourner
breaking an areca-nut on the threshold places it in his mouth and spits it out
of the door, signifying the final ejectment of the deceased’s spirit from the
house. Finally, the chief mourner goes to worship at Maroti’s shrine, and the
household resumes its ordinary life. The different relatives of the deceased
man usually invite the bereaved family to their house for a day and give
them a feast, and if they have many relations this may go on for a
considerable time. The complete procedure as detailed above is observed
only in the case of the head of the household, and for less important
members is considerably abbreviated. The position of chief mourner is
occupied by a man’s eldest son, or in the absence of sons by his younger
brother, or failing him by the eldest son of an elder brother, or failing male
relations by the widow. The chief mourner is considered to have a special
claim to the property. He has the whole of his head and face shaved, and the
hair is tied up in a corner of the grave-cloth. If the widow is chief mourner a
small lock of her hair is cut off and tied up in the cloth. When the corpse is
being carried out for burial the widow breaks her mangalsūtram or marriage
necklace, and wipes off the kunku or vermilion from her forehead. This
necklace consists of a string of black glass beads with a piece of gold, and is
always placed on the bride’s neck at the wedding. The widow does not break
her glass bangles at all, but on the eleventh day changes them for new ones.

15. Mourning

The period of mourning for adults of the family is ten days, and for children
three, while in the case of distant relatives it is sufficient to take a bath as a
mark of respect for them. The male mourners shave their heads, the walls of
the house are whitewashed and the floor spread with cowdung. The chief
mourner avoids social intercourse and abstains from ordinary work and from
all kinds of amusements. He debars himself from such luxuries as betel-leaf
and from visiting his wife. Oblations are offered to the dead on the third day
of the light fortnight of Baisākh (June) and on the last day of Bhādrapad

Page 55

(September). The Kunbi is a firm believer in the action of ghosts and spirits,
and never omits the attentions due to his ancestors. On the appointed day he
diligently calls on the crows, who represent the spirits of ancestors, to come
and eat the food which he places ready for them; and if no crow turns up, he
is disturbed at having incurred the displeasure of the dead. He changes the
food and goes on calling until a crow comes, and then concludes that their
previous failure to appear was due to the fact that his ancestors were not
pleased with the kind of food he first offered. In future years, therefore, he
changes it, and puts out that which was eaten, until a similar contretemps of
the non-appearance of crows again occurs. The belief that the spirits of the
dead pass into crows is no doubt connected with that of the crow’s longevity.
Many Hindus think that a crow lives a thousand years, and others that it
never dies of disease, but only when killed by violence. Tennyson’s ‘many-
wintered crow’ may indicate some similar idea in Europe. Similarly if the
Gonds find a crow’s nest they give the nestlings to young children to eat, and
think that this will make them long-lived. If a crow perches in the house
when a woman’s husband or other relative is away, she says, ‘Fly away,
crow; fly away and I will feed you’; and if the crow then flies away she
thinks that the absent one will return. Here the idea is no doubt that if he had
been killed his spirit might have come home in the shape of the crow
perching on the house. If a married woman sees two crows breeding it is
considered a very bad omen, the effect being that her husband will soon die.
It is probably supposed that his spirit will pass into the young crow which is
born as a result of the meeting which she has seen.

Mr. A. K. Smith states that the omen applies to men also, and relates a story
of a young advocate who saw two crows thus engaged on alighting from the
train at some station. In order to avert the consequences he ran to the
telegraph office and sent messages to all his relatives and friends announcing
his own death, the idea being that this fictitious death would fulfil the omen,
and the real death would thus become unnecessary. In this case the belief
would be that the man’s own spirit would pass into the young crow.

Page 56

16. Religion

The principal deities of the caste are Māroti or Hanumān, Mahādeo or Siva,
Devi, Satwai and Khandoba. Māroti is worshipped principally on Saturdays,
so that he may counteract the evil influences exercised by the planet Saturn
on that day. When a new village is founded Māroti must first be brought and
placed in the village and worshipped, and after this houses are built. The
name Māroti is derived from Marut, the Vedic god of the wind, and he is
considered to be the son of Vāyu, the wind, and Anjini. Khandoba is an
incarnation of Siva as a warrior, and is the favourite deity of the Marāthas.
Devi is usually venerated in her Incarnation of Marhai Māta, the goddess of
smallpox and cholera—the most dreaded scourges of the Hindu villager.
They offer goats and fowls to Marhai Devi, cutting the throat of the animal
and letting its blood drop over the stone, which represents the goddess; after
this they cut off a leg and hang it to the tree above her shrine, and eat the
remainder. Sometimes also they offer wooden images of human beings,
which are buried before the shrine of the goddess and are obviously
substitutes for a human sacrifice; and the lower castes offer pigs. If a man
dies of snake-bite they make a little silver image of a snake, and then kill a
real snake, and make a platform outside the village and place the image on it,
which is afterwards regularly worshipped as Nāgoba Deo. They may perhaps
think that the spirit of the snake which is killed passes into the silver image.
Somebody afterwards steals the image, but this does not matter. Similarly if
a man is killed by a tiger he is deified and worshipped as Bāghoba Deo,
though they cannot kill a tiger as a preliminary. The Kunbis make images of
their ancestors in silver or brass, and keep them in a basket with their other
household deities. But when these get too numerous they take them on a
pilgrimage to some sacred river and deposit them in it. A man who has lost
both parents will invite some man and woman on Akshaya Tritiya,23 and call
them by the names of his parents, and give them a feast. Among the
mythological stories known to the caste is one of some interest, explaining
how the dark spots came on the face of the moon. They say that once all the

Page 57

gods were going to a dinner-party, each riding on his favourite animal or
vāhan (conveyance). But the vāhan of Ganpati, the fat god with the head of
an elephant, was a rat, and the rat naturally could not go as fast as the other
animals, and as it was very far from being up to Ganpati’s weight, it tripped
and fell, and Ganpati came off. The moon was looking on, and laughed so
much that Ganpati was enraged, and cursed it, saying, ‘Thy face shall be
black for laughing at me.’ Accordingly the moon turned quite black; but the
other gods interfered, and said that the curse was too hard, so Ganpati agreed
that only a part of the moon’s face should be blackened in revenge for the
insult. This happened on the fourth day of the bright fortnight of Bhādon
(September), and on that day it is said that nobody should look at the moon,
as if he does, his reputation will probably be lowered by some false charge
or libel being promulgated against him. As already stated, the Kunbi firmly
believes in the influence exercised by spirits, and a proverb has it,
‘Brāhmans die of indigestion, Sunārs from bile, and Kunbis from ghosts’;
because the Brāhman is always feasted as an act of charity and given the best
food, so that he over-eats himself, while the Sunār gets bilious from sitting
all day before a furnace. When somebody falls ill his family get a Brāhman’s
cast-off sacred thread, and folding it to hold a little lamp, will wave this to
and fro. If it moves in a straight line they say that the patient is possessed by
a spirit, but if in a circle that his illness is due to natural causes. In the former
case they promise an offering to the spirit to induce it to depart from the
patient. The Brāhmans, it is said, try to prevent the Kunbis from getting hold
of their sacred threads, because they think that by waving the lamp in them,
all the virtue which they have obtained by their repetitions of the Gāyatri or
sacred prayer is transferred to the sick Kunbi. They therefore tear up their
cast-off threads or sew them into clothes.

17. The Pola festival

The principal festival of the Kunbis is the Pola, falling at about the middle of
the rainy season, when they have a procession of plough-bullocks. An old
bullock goes first, and on his horns is tied the makhar, a wooden frame with

Page 58

pegs to which torches are affixed. They make a rope of mango-leaves
stretched between two posts, and the makhar bullock is made to break this
and stampede back to the village, followed by all the other cattle. It is said
that the makhar bullock will die within three years. Behind him come the
bullocks of the proprietors and then those of the tenants in the order, not so
much of their wealth, but of their standing in the village and of the
traditional position held by their families. A Kunbi feels it very bitterly if he
is not given what he considers to be his proper rank in this procession. It has
often been remarked that the feudal feeling of reverence for hereditary rights
and position is as strong among the Marātha people as anywhere in the
world.

Figures of animals made for Pola festival

Page 59

18. Muhammadan tendencies of Berār Kunbis

In Wardha and Berār the customs of the Kunbis show in several respects the
influence of Islām, due no doubt to the long period of Muhammadan
dominance in the country. To this may perhaps be attributed the prevalence
of burial of the dead instead of cremation, the more respectable method
according to Hindu ideas. The Dhanoje Kunbis commonly revere Dāwal
Mālik, a Muhammadan saint, whose tomb is at Uprai in Amraoti District. An
urus or fair is held here on Thursdays, the day commonly sacred to
Muhammadan saints, and on this account the Kunbis will not be shaved on
Thursdays. They also make vows of mendicancy at the Muharram festival,
and go round begging for rice and pulse; they give a little of what they
obtain to Muhammadan beggars and eat the rest. At the Muharram they tie a
red thread on their necks and dance round the alāwa, a small hole in which
fire is kindled in front of the tāsias or tombs of Hussain. At the Muharram24
they also carry horseshoes of silver or gilt tinsel on the top of a stick
decorated with peacock’s feathers. The horseshoe is a model of that of the
horse of Hussain. The men who carry these horseshoes are supposed to be
possessed by the spirit of the saint, and people make prayers to them for
anything they want. If one of the horseshoes is dropped the finder will keep
it in his house, and next year if he feels that the spirit moves him will carry it
himself. In Wardha the Kunbis worship Khwāja Sheikh Farīd of Girar, and
occasionally Sheikh Farīd appears to a Kunbi in a dream and places him
under a vow. Then he and all his household make little imitation beggars’
wallets of cloth and dye them with red ochre, and little hoes on the model of
those which saises use to drag out horses’ dung, this hoe being the badge of
Sheikh Farīd. Then they go round begging to all the houses in the village,
saying, ‘Dam,25 Sāhib, dam.’ With the alms given them they make cakes of
malīda, wheat, sugar and butter, and give them to the priest of the shrine.
Sometimes Sheikh Farīd tells the Kunbi in the dream that he must buy a goat
of a certain Dhangar (shepherd), naming the price, while the Dhangar is
similarly warned to sell it at the same price, and the goat is then purchased

Page 60

and sacrificed without any haggling: At the end of the sacrifice the priest
releases the Kunbi from his vow, and he must then shave the whole of his
head and distribute liquor to the caste-fellows in order to be received back
into the community. The water of the well at Sheikh Farīd’s shrine at Girar is
considered to preserve the crops against insects, and for this purpose it is
carried to considerable distances to be sprinkled on them.

Hindu boys on stilts

19. Villages and houses

An ordinary Kunbi village26 contains between 70 and 80 houses or some 400
souls. The village generally lies on a slight eminence near a nullah or
stream, and is often nicely planted with tamarind or pīpal trees. The houses
are now generally tiled for fear of fire, and their red roofs may be seen from

Page 61

a distance forming a little cluster on high lying ground, an elevated site
being selected so as to keep the roads fairly dry, as the surface tracks in
black-soil country become almost impassable sloughs of mud as soon as the
rains have broken. The better houses stand round an old mud fort, a relic of
the Pindāri raids, when, on the first alarm of the approach of these
marauding bands, the whole population hurried within its walls. The village
proprietor’s house is now often built inside the fort. It is an oblong building
surrounded by a compound wall of unbaked bricks, and with a gateway
through which a cart can drive. Adjoining the entrance on each side are
rooms for the reception of guests, in which constables, chuprāssies and
others are lodged when they stay at night in the village. Kothas or sheds for
keeping cattle and grain stand against the walls, and the dwelling-house is at
the back. Substantial tenants have a house like the proprietor’s, of well-laid
mud, whitewashed and with tiled roof; but the ordinary cultivator’s house is
one-roomed, with an angan or small yard in front and a little space for a
garden behind, in which vegetables are grown during the rains. The walls are
of bamboo matting plastered over with mud. The married couples sleep
inside, the room being partitioned off if there are two or more in the family,
and the older persons sleep in the verandahs. In the middle of the village by
the biggest temple will be an old pīpal tree, the trunk encircled by an earthen
or stone platform, which answers to the village club. The respectable
inhabitants will meet here while the lower classes go to the liquor-shop
nearly every night to smoke and chat. The blacksmith’s and carpenter’s
shops are also places of common resort for the cultivators. Hither they wend
in the morning and evening, often taking with them some implement which
has to be mended, and stay to talk. The blacksmith in particular is said to be
a great gossip, and will often waste much of his customer’s time, plying him
for news and retailing it, before he repairs and hands back the tool brought to
him. The village is sure to contain two or three little temples of Māroti or
Mahādeo. The stones which do duty for the images are daily oiled with
butter or ghī, and a miscellaneous store of offerings will accumulate round
the buildings. Outside the village will be a temple of Devi or Māta Mai
(Smallpox Goddess) with a heap of little earthen horses and a string of hens’
feet and feathers hung up on the wall. The little platforms which are the
shrines of the other village gods will be found in the fields or near groves. In
the evening the elders often meet at Māroti’s temple and pay their respects to

Page 62

the deity, bowing or prostrating themselves before him. A lamp before the
temple is fed by contributions of oil from the women, and is kept burning
usually up to midnight. Once a year in the month, of Shrāwan (July) the
villagers subscribe and have a feast, the Kunbis eating first and the menial
and labouring castes after them. In this month also all the village deities are
worshipped by the Joshi or priest and the villagers. In summer the cultivators
usually live in their fields, where they erect temporary sheds of bamboo
matting roofed with juāri stalks. In these most of the household furniture is
stored, while at a little distance in another funnel-shaped erection of bamboo
matting is kept the owner’s grain. This system of camping out is mainly
adopted for fear of fire in the village, when the cultivator’s whole stock of
grain and his household goods might be destroyed in a few minutes without
possibility of saving them. The women stay in the village, and the men and
boys go there for their midday and evening meals.

20. Furniture

Ordinary cultivators have earthen pots for cooking purposes and brass ones
for eating from, while the well-to-do have all their vessels of brass. The
furniture consists of a few stools and cots. No Kunbi will lie on the ground,
probably because a dying man is always laid on the ground to breathe his
last; and so every one has a cot consisting of a wooden frame with a bed
made of hempen string or of the root-fibres of the palās tree (Butea
frondosa). These cots are always too short for a man to lie on them at full
length, and are in consequence supremely uncomfortable. The reason may
perhaps be found in the belief that a man should always lie on a bed a little
shorter than himself so that his feet project over the end. Because if the bed
is longer than he is, it resembles a bier, and if he lies on a bier once he may
soon die and lie on it a second time. For bathing they make a little enclosure
in the compound with mats, and place two or three flat stones in it. Hot
water is generally used and they rub the perspiration off their bodies with a
flat stone called Jhāwar. Most Kunbis bathe daily. On days when they are
shaved they plaster the head with soft black earth, and then wash it off and

Page 63

rub their bodies with a little linseed or sesamum oil, or, if they can afford it,
with cocoanut oil.

21. Food

The Kunbis eat three times a day, at about eight in the morning, at midday
and after dark. The morning meal is commonly eaten in the field and the two
others at home. At midday the cultivator comes home from work, bathes and
takes his meal, having a rest for about two hours in all. After finishing work
he again comes home and has his evening meal, and then, after a rest, at
about ten o’clock he goes again to the fields, if the crops are on the ground,
and sleeps on the mara or small elevated platform erected in the field to
protect the grain from birds and wild animals; occasionally waking and
emitting long-drawn howls or pulling the strings which connect with
clappers in various parts of the field. Thus for nearly eight months of the
year the Kunbi sleeps in his fields, and only during the remaining period at
home. Juāri is the staple food of the caste, and is eaten both raw and cooked.
The raw pods of juāri were the provision carried with them on their saddles
by the marauding Marātha horsemen, and the description of Sivaji getting
his sustenance from gnawing at one of these as he rode along is said to have
struck fear into the heart of the Nizām. It is a common custom among well-
to-do tenants and proprietors to invite their friends to a picnic in the fields
when the crop is ripe to eat hurda or the pods of juāri roasted in hot ashes.
For cooking purposes juāri is ground in an ordinary handmill and then
passed through a sieve, which separates the finer from the coarser particles.
The finer flour is made into dough with hot water and baked into thick flat
chapātis or cakes, weighing more than half a pound each; while the coarse
flour is boiled in water like rice. The boiled pulse of arhar (Cajanus indicus)
is commonly eaten with juāri, and the chapātis are either dipped into cold
linseed oil or consumed dry. The sameness of this diet is varied by a number
of green vegetables, generally with very little savour to a European palate.
These are usually boiled and then mixed into a salad with linseed or
sesamum oil and flavoured with salt or powdered chillies, these last being

Page 64

the Kunbi’s indispensable condiment. He is also very fond of onions and
garlic, which are either chopped and boiled, or eaten raw. Butter-milk when
available is mixed with the boiled juāri after it is cooked, while wheat and
rice, butter and sugar are delicacies reserved for festivals. As a rule only
water is drunk, but the caste indulge in country liquor on festive occasions.
Tobacco is commonly chewed after each meal or smoked in leaf cigarettes,
or in chilams or clay pipe-bowls without a stem. Men also take snuff, and a
few women chew tobacco and take snuff, though they do not smoke. It is
noticeable that different subdivisions of the caste will commonly take food
from each other in Berār, whereas in the Central Provinces they refuse to do
so. The more liberal usage in Berār is possibly another case of
Muhammadan influence. Small children eat with their father and brothers,
but the women always wait on the men, and take their own food afterwards.
Among the Dālia Kunbis of Nimār, however, women eat before men at caste
feasts in opposition to the usual practice. It is stated in explanation that on
one occasion when the men had finished their meal first and gone home, the
women on returning were waylaid in the dark and robbed of their ornaments.
And hence it was decided that they should always eat first and go home
before nightfall. The Kunbi is fairly liberal in the matter of food. He will eat
the flesh of goats, sheep and deer, all kinds of fish and fowls, and will drink
liquor. In Hoshangābād and Nimār the higher subcastes abstain from flesh
and wine. The caste will take food cooked without water from Brāhmans,
Banias and Sunārs, and that mixed with water only from Marātha Brāhmans.
All castes except Marātha Brāhmans will take water from the hands of a
Kunbi.

Page 65

Throwing stilts into the water at the Pola festival

22. Clothes and ornaments

The dress of the ordinary cultivator is most common-place and consists only
of a loin-cloth, another cloth thrown over the shoulders and upper part of the
body, which except for this is often bare, and a third rough cloth wound
loosely round the head. All these, originally white, soon assume a very dingy
hue. There is thus no colour in a man’s everyday attire, but the gala dress for
holidays consists of a red pagri or turban, a black, coloured or white coat,
and a white loin-cloth with red silk borders if he can afford it. The Kunbi is
seldom or never seen with his head bare; this being considered a bad omen
because every one bares his head when a death occurs. Women wear lugras,
or a single long cloth of red, blue or black cotton, and under this the choli, or
small breast-cloth. They have one silk-bordered cloth for special occasions.
A woman having a husband alive must not wear a white cloth with no colour
in it, as this is the dress of widows. A white cloth with a coloured border may
be worn. The men generally wear shoes which are open at the back of the

Page 66

heel, and clatter as they move along. Women do not, as a rule, wear shoes
unless these are necessary for field work, or if they go out just after their
confinement. But they have now begun to do so in towns. Women have the
usual collection of ornaments on all parts of the person. The head ornaments
should be of gold when this metal can be afforded. On the finger they have a
miniature mirror set in a ring; as a rule not more than one ring is worn, so
that the hands may be free for work. For a similar reason glass bangles,
being fragile, are worn only on the left wrist and metal ones on the right. But
the Dhanoje Kunbis, as already stated, have cocoanut shell bangles on both
wrists. They smear a mark of red powder on the forehead or have a spangle
there. Girls are generally tattooed in childhood when the skin is tender, and
the operation is consequently less painful. They usually have a small
crescent and circle between the brows, small circles or dots on each temple
and on the nose, cheeks and chin, and five small marks on the back of the
hands to represent flies. Some of the Deshmukh families have now adopted
the sacred thread; they also put caste marks on the forehead, and wear the
shape of pagri or turban formerly distinctive of Marātha Brāhmans.

23. The Kunbi as cultivator

The Kunbi has the stolidity, conservative instincts, dulness and patience of
the typical agriculturist. Sir R. Craddock describes him as follows27: “Of the
purely agricultural classes the Kunbis claim first notice. They are divided
into several sections or classes, and are of Marātha origin, the Jhāri Kunbis
(the Kunbis of the wild country) being the oldest settlers, and the Deshkar
(the Kunbis from the Deccan) the most recent. The Kunbi is certainly a most
plodding, patient mortal, with a cat-like affection for his land, and the
proprietary and cultivating communities, of both of which Kunbis are the
most numerous members, are unlikely to fail so long as he keeps these
characteristics. Some of the more intelligent and affluent of the caste, who
have risen to be among the most prosperous members of the community, are
as shrewd men of business in their way as any section of the people, though
lacking in education. I remember one of these, a member of the Local Board,

Page 67

who believed that the land revenue of the country was remitted to England
annually to form part of the private purse of the Queen Empress. But of the
general body of the Kunbi caste it is true to say that in the matter of
enterprise, capacity to hold their own with the moneylender, determination
to improve their standard of comfort, or their style of agriculture, they lag far
behind such cultivating classes as the Kirār, the Rāghvi and the Lodhi.
While, however, the Kunbi yields to these classes in some of the more
showy attributes which lead to success in life, he is much their superior in
endurance under adversity, he is more law-abiding, and he commands, both
by reason of his character and his caste, greater social respect among the
people at large. The wealthy Kunbi proprietor is occasionally rather spoilt by
good fortune, or, if he continues a keen cultivator, is apt to be too fond of
land-grabbing. But these are the exceptional cases, and there is generally no
such pleasing spectacle as that afforded by a village in which the cultivators
and the proprietors are all Kunbis living in harmony together.” The feeling28
of the Kunbi towards agricultural improvements has hitherto probably been
something the same as that of the Sussex farmer who said, ‘Our old land, it
likes our old ploughs’ to the agent who was vainly trying to demonstrate to
him the advantages of the modern two-horse iron plough over the great
wooden local tool; and the emblem ascribed to old Sussex—a pig couchant
with the motto ‘I wun’t be druv’—would suit the Kunbi equally well. But
the Kunbi, too, though he could not express it, knows something of the
pleasure of the simple outdoor life, the fresh smell of the soil after rain, the
joy of the yearly miracle when the earth is again carpeted with green from
the bursting into life of the seed which he has sown, and the pleasure of
watching the harvest of his labours come to fruition. He, too, as has been
seen, feels something corresponding to “That inarticulate love of the English
farmer for his land, his mute enjoyment of the furrow crumbling from the
ploughshare or the elastic tread of his best pastures under his heel, his ever-
fresh satisfaction at the sight of the bullocks stretching themselves as they
rise from the soft grass.”

Page 68

Carrying out the dead

24. Social and moral characteristics

Some characteristics of the Marātha people are noticed by Sir R. Jenkins as
follows29: “The most remarkable feature perhaps in the character of the
Marāthas of all descriptions is the little regard they pay to show or ceremony
in the common intercourse of life. A peasant or mechanic of the lowest order,
appearing before his superiors, will sit down of his own accord, tell his story
without ceremony, and converse more like an equal than an inferior; and if
he has a petition he talks in a loud and boisterous tone and fearlessly sets
forth his claims. Both the peasantry and the better classes are often coarse
and indelicate in their language, and many of the proverbs, which they are

Page 69

fond of introducing into conversation, are extremely gross. In general the
Marāthas, and particularly the cultivators, are not possessed of much activity
or energy of character, but they have quick perception of their own interest,
though their ignorance of writing and accounts often renders them the dupes
of the artful Brāhmans.” “The Kunbi,” Mr. Forbes remarks,30 “though
frequently all submission and prostration when he makes his appearance in a
revenue office, is sturdy and bold enough among his own people. He is fond
of asserting his independence and the helplessness of others without his aid,
on which subject he has several proverbs, as: ‘Wherever it thunders there the
Kunbi is a landholder,’ and ‘Tens of millions are dependent on the Kunbi,
but the Kunbi depends on no man.’” This sense of his own importance,
which has also been noticed among the Jāts, may perhaps be ascribed to the
Kunbi’s ancient status as a free and full member of the village community.
“The Kunbi and his bullocks are inseparable, and in speaking of the one it is
difficult to dissociate the other. His pride in these animals is excusable, for
they are most admirably suited to the circumstances in which nature has
placed them, and possess a very wide-extended fame. But the Kunbi
frequently exhibits his fondness for them in the somewhat peculiar form of
unmeasured abuse. ‘May the Kāthis31 seize you!’ is his objurgation if in the
peninsula of Surat; if in the Idar district or among the mountains it is there
‘May the tiger kill you!’ and all over Gujarāt, ‘May your master die!’
However, he means by this the animal’s former owner, not himself; and
when more than usually cautious he will word his chiding thus—‘May the
fellow that sold you to me perish.’” But now the Kāthis raid no more and the
tiger, though still taking good toll of cattle in the Central Provinces, is not
the ever-present terror that once he was. But the bullock himself is no longer
so sacrosanct in the Kunbi’s eyes, and cannot look forward with the same
certainty to an old age of idleness, threatened only by starvation in the hot
weather or death by surfeit of the new moist grass in the rains; and when
therefore the Kunbi’s patience is exhausted by these aggravating animals, his
favourite threat at present is, ‘I will sell you to the Kasais’ (butchers); and
not so very infrequently he ends by doing so. It may be noted that with the
development of the cotton industry the Kunbi of Wardha is becoming much
sharper and more capable of protecting his own interests, while with the
assistance and teaching which he now receives from the Agricultural

Page 70

Department, a rapid and decided improvement is taking place in his skill as a
cultivator.

1 Rāsmāla, i. p. 100.

2 Ibidem, p. 241.
3 Khāndesh Gazetteer, p. 62.

4 Bombay Gazetteer, vol. i. part ii. p. 34.
5 From jihār, a tree or shrub.

6 Acacia catechu.
7 Dhan properly means wealth, cf. the two meanings of the word stock in English.

8 Berār Census Report (1881), para. 180.
9 Ibidem.

10 Bāwan = fifty-two.
11 Bombay Gazetteer, Hindus of Gujarāt p. 490, App. B, Gūjar.

12 Eugenia jambolana.
13 Ficus glomerata.

14 See the article entitled ‘An Anthropoid.’
15 Bombay Gazetteer; Nāsik p. 26.

16 This is the rule in the Nāgpur District.
17 From a note by Mr. A. K. Smith, C.S.

18 Circle Inspector Ganesh Prasād.
19 Semicarpus anacardium.

20 ‘Oh, Lord Mahābīr, give me a child, only one child.’
21 Beast and Man in India, p. 44. But, according to the same writer, the Hindus do say, ‘Drunk as an
owl’ and also ‘Stupid as an owl.’

22 Crotalaria juncea.
23 The 3rd Baisākh (May) Sudi, the commencement of the agricultural year. The name means, ‘The
day of immortality.’

Page 71

24 Furnished by Inspector Ganesh Prasād.

25 Dam: breath or life.
26 These paragraphs are largely based on a description of a Wardha village by Mr. A.K. Smith, C.S.

27 Nāgpur Settlement Report, para. 45.
28 The references to English farming in this paragraph are taken from an article in the Saturday
Review of 22nd August 1908.

29 Report on the Territories of the Rāja of Nāgpur.
30 Rāsmālā, ii. 242.

31 A freebooting tribe who gave their name to Kāthiawār.

Page 72

Kunjra
Kunjra.1—A caste of greengrocers, who sell country vegetables and fruit
and are classed as Muhammadans. Mr. Crooke derives the name from the
Sanskrit kunj, ‘a bower or arbour.’ They numbered about 1600 persons in the
Central Provinces in 1911, principally in the Jubbulpore Division. The
customs of the Kunjras appear to combine Hindu and Muhammadan rites in
an indiscriminate medley. It is reported that marriage is barred only between
real brothers and sisters and foster brothers and sisters, the latter rule being
known as Dudh bachāna, or ‘Observing the tie of the milk.’ At their
betrothal presents are given to the parties, and after this a powder of henna
leaves is sent to the boy, who rubs it on his fingers and returns it to the girl
that she may do the same. As among the Hindus, the bodies of the bridal
couple are anointed with oil and turmeric at their respective houses before
the wedding. A marriage-shed is made and the bridegroom goes to the
bride’s house wearing a cotton quilt and riding on a bullock. The barber
holds the umbrella over his head and must be given a present before he will
fold it, but the wedding is performed by the Kāzi according to the Nikāh
ceremony by the repetition of verses from the Korān. The wedding is held at
four o’clock in the morning, and as a preliminary to it the bride is presented
with some money by the boy’s father, which is known as the Meher or
dowry. On its conclusion a cup of sherbet is given to the bridegroom, of
which he drinks half and hands the remainder to the bride. The gift of the
Meher is considered to seal the marriage contract. When a widow is married
the Kāzi is also employed, and he simply recites the Kalama or
Muhammadan profession of belief, and the ceremony is completed by the
distribution of dates to the elders of the caste. Divorce is permitted and is
known as talāq. The caste observe the Muhammadan festivals, and have
some favourite saints of their own to whom they make offerings of gulgula a
kind of pudding, with sacrifices of goats and fowls. Participation in these
rites is confined to members of the family. Children are named on the day of
their birth, the Muhammadan Kāzi or a Hindu Brāhman being employed
indifferently to select the name. If the parents lose one or more children, in

Page 73

order to preserve the lives of those subsequently born, they will allow the
choti or scalp-lock to grow on their heads in the Hindu fashion, dedicating it
to one of their Muhammadan saints. Others will put a hasli or silver circlet
round the neck of the child and add a ring to this every year; a strip of
leather is sometimes also tied round the neck. When the child reaches the
age of twelve years the scalp-lock is shaved, the leather band thrown into a
river and the silver necklet sold. Offerings are made to the saints and a feast
is given to the friends of the family. The dead are buried, camphor and attar
of roses being applied to the corpse. On the Tīja and Chālisa, or third and
fortieth days after a death, a feast is given to the caste-fellows, but no
mourning is observed, neither do the mourners bathe nor perform
ceremonies of purification. On the Tīja the Korān is also read and fried grain
is distributed to children. For the death of a child the ordinary feasts need not
be given, but prayers are offered for their souls with those of the other dead
once a year on the night of Shab-i-Barāt or the fifteenth day of the month
Shabān,2 which is observed as a vigil with prayer, feasts and illuminations
and offerings to the ancestors. Kunjra men are usually clean-shaven with the
exception of the beard, which is allowed to grow long below the chin. Their
women are not tattooed. In the cities, Mr. Crooke remarks,3 their women
have an equivocal reputation, as the better-looking girls who sit in the shops
are said to use considerable freedom of manners to attract customers. They
are also very quarrelsome and abusive when bargaining for the sale of their
wares or arguing with each other. This is so much the case that men who
become very abusive are said to be behaving like Kunjras; while in Dacca
Sir H. Risley states4 that the word Kunjra has become a term of abuse, so
that the caste are ashamed to be known by it, and call themselves Mewa-
farosh, Sabzi-farosh or Bepāri. When two women are having an altercation,
their husbands and other male relatives are forbidden to interfere on pain of
social degradation. The women never sit on the ground, but on small wooden
stools or pīrhis. The Kunjras belong chiefly to the north of the Province, and
in the south their place is taken by the Marārs and Mālis who carry their own
produce for sale to the markets. The Kunjras sell sugarcane, potatoes, onions
and all kinds of vegetables, and others deal in the dried fruits imported by
Kābuli merchants.

Page 74

1 This article is partly based on papers by Nanhe Khān, Sub-Inspector of Police, Khurai, Saugor,
and Kesho Rao, Headmaster, Middle School, Seoni-Chhapāra.

2 Literally ‘The Month of Separatica.’ It is the eighth month of the Muhammadan year and is said
to be so called because in this month the Arabs broke up their encampments and scattered in
search of water. On the night of Shab-i-Barāt God registers all the actions of men which they are to
perform during the year; and all the children of men who are to be born and die in the year are
recorded. Though properly a fast, it is generally observed with rejoicings and a display of fireworks.
Hughes’ Dictionary of Islam, p. 570.
3 Tribes and Castes of the N.W.P., art. Kunjra.

4 Tribes and Castes of Bengal, ibidem.

Page 75

Kuramwār
Kuramwār.1—The shepherd caste of southern India, who are identical with
the Tamil Kurumba and the Telugu Kuruba. The caste is an important one in
Madras, but in the Central Provinces is confined to the Chānda District
where it numbered some 4000 persons in 1911. The Kuramwārs are
considered to be the modern representatives of the ancient Pallava tribe
whose kings were powerful in southern India in the seventh century.2

The marriage rules of the Kuramwārs are interesting. If a girl reaches
adolescence while still single, she is finally expelled from the caste, her
parents being also subjected to a penalty for readmission. Formerly it is said
that such a girl was sacrificed to the river-goddess by being placed in a small
hut on the river-bank till a flood came and swept her away. Now she is taken
to the river and kept in a hut, while offerings are made to the river-goddess,
and she may then return and live in the village though she is out of caste. In
Madras, as a preliminary to the marriage, the bridegroom’s father observes
certain marks or ‘curls’ on the head or hair of the bride proposed. Some of
these are believed to forecast prosperity and others misery to the family into
which she enters. They are therefore very cautious in selecting only such
girls as possess curls (sūli) of good fortune. The writer of the North Arcot
Manual3 after recording the above particulars, remarks: “This curious
custom obtaining among this primitive tribe is observed by others only in the
case of the purchase of cows, bulls and horses.” In the Central Provinces,
however, at least one parallel instance can be given from the northern
Districts where any mark resembling the V on the head of a cobra is
considered to be very inauspicious. And it is told that a girl who married into
one well-known family bore it, and to this fact the remarkable succession of
misfortunes which has attended the family is locally attributed. Among the
Kuramwārs marriages can be celebrated only on four days in the year, the
fifth day of both fortnights of Phāgun (February), the tenth day of the second
fortnight of the same month and the third day of Baisākh (April). At the
marriage the bride and bridegroom are seated together under the canopy,

Page 76

with the shuttle which is used for weaving blankets between them, and they
throw coloured rice at each other. After this a miniature swing is put up and a
doll is placed in it in imitation of a child and swung to and fro. The bride
then takes the doll out and gives it to the bridegroom, saying: ‘Here, take
care of it, I am now going to cook food’; while after a time the boy returns
the doll to the girl, saying, ‘I must now weave the blanket and go to tend the
flock.’ The proceeding seems a symbolic enactment of the cares of married
life and the joint tending of the baby, this sort of symbolism being
particularly noticeable in the marriage ceremonies of the people of Madras.
Divorce is not permitted even though the wife be guilty of adultery, and if
she runs away to her father’s house her husband cannot use force to bring
her back if she refuses to return to him. The Kuramwārs worship the
implements of their calling at the festival of Ganesh Chaturthi, and if any
family fails to do this it is put out of caste. They also revere annually
Mallana Deva and Mallani Devi who guard their flocks respectively from
attacks of tigers and epidemics of murrain. The shrines of these deities are
generally built under a banyan tree and open to the east. The caste are
shepherds and graziers and also make blankets. They are poor and ignorant,
and the Abbé Dubois4 says of them: “Being confined to the society of their
woolly charge, they seem to have contracted the stupid nature of the animal,
and from the rudeness of their nature they are as much beneath the other
castes of Hindus as the sheep by their simplicity and imperfect instruction
are beneath the other quadrupeds.” Hence the proverbial comparison ‘As
stupid as a Kuramwār.’ When out of doors the Kuramwār retains the most
primitive method of eating and drinking; he takes his food in a leaf and licks
it up with his tongue, and sucks up water from a tank or river with his
mouth. They justify this custom by saying that on one occasion their god had
taken his food out of the house on a leaf-plate and was proceeding to eat it
with his hands when his sheep ran away and he had to go and fetch them
back. In the meantime a crow came and pecked at the food and so spoilt it. It
was therefore ordained that all the caste should eat their food straight off the
leaf, in order to do which they would have to take it from the cooking-pot in
small quantities and there would be no chance of leaving any for the crows
to spoil. The story is interesting as showing how very completely the deity of
the Kuramwārs is imagined on the principle that god made man in his own
image. Or, as a Frenchman has expressed the idea, ‘Dieu a fait l’homme à

Page 77

son image, mais l’homme le lui a bein rendu.’ The caste are dark in colour
and may be distinguished by their caps made from pieces of blankets, and by
their wearing a woollen cord round the waist over the loin-cloth. They speak
a dialect of Canarese.

1 This article is compiled from notes taken by Mr. Hīra Lāl and by Pyāre Lāl Misra, Ethnographic
clerk.

2 North Arcot Manual, vol. i. p. 220.
3 Vol. i. p. 224.

4 Hindu Manners, Customs and Ceremonies.

Page 78

Page 79

Kurmi
List of Paragraphs

1. Numbers and derivation of name
2. Functional character of the caste
3. Subcastes
4. Exogamous groups
5. Marriage rules. Betrothal
6. The marriage-shed or pavilion
7. The marriage-cakes
8. Customs at the wedding
9. Walking round the sacred post
10. Other ceremonies
11. Polygamy widow-marriage and divorce
12. Impurity of women
13. Pregnancy rites
14. Earth-eating
15. Customs at birth
16. Treatment of mother and child
17. Ceremonies after birth
18. Suckling children
19. Beliefs about twins
20. Disposal of the dead
21. Funeral rites
22. Burning the dead
23. Burial
24. Return of the soul
25. Mourning
26. Shaving, and presents to Brahmans
27. End of mourning
28. Anniversaries of the dead
29. Beliefs in the hereafter

Page 80

30. Religion. Village gods
31. Sowing the Jawaras or Gardens of Adonis
32. Rites connected with the crops. Customs of cultivation
33. Agricultural superstitions
34. Houses
35. Superstitions about houses
36. Furniture
37. Clothes
38. Women’s clothes
39. Bathing
40. Food
41. Caste-feasts
42. Hospitality
43. Social customs. Tattooing
44. Caste penalties
45. The cultivating status
46. Occupation
Appendix: List of Exogamous Clans

1. Numbers and derivation of name

Kurmi.1—The representative cultivating caste of Hindustān or the country
comprised roughly in the United Provinces, Bihār arid the Central Provinces
north of the Nerbudda. In 1911 the Kurmis numbered about 300,000 persons
in the Central Provinces, of whom half belonged to the Chhattīsgarh
Division and a third to the Jubbulpore Division; the Districts in which they
were most numerous being Saugor, Damoh, Jubbulpore, Hoshangābād,
Raipur, Bilāspur and Drūg. The name is considered to be derived from the
Sanskrit krishi, cultivation, or from kurma, the tortoise incarnation of
Vishnu, whether because it is the totem of the caste or because, as suggested
by one writer, the Kurmi supports the population of India as the tortoise
supports the earth. It is true that many Kurmis say they belong to the

Page 81

Kashyap gotra, Kashyap being the name of a Rishi, which seems to have
been derived from kachhap, the tortoise; but many other castes also say they
belong to the Kashyap gotra or worship the tortoise, and if this has any
connection with the name of the caste it is probable that the caste-name
suggested the gotra-name and not the reverse. It is highly improbable that a
large occupational caste should be named after an animal, and the
metaphorical similitude can safely be rejected. The name seems therefore
either to come from krishi, cultivation, or from some other unknown source.

2. Functional character of the caste

There seems little reason to doubt that the Kurmis, like the Kunbis, are a
functional caste. In Bihār they show traces of Aryan blood, and are a fine-
looking race. But in Chota Nāgpur Sir H. Risley states: “Short, sturdy and of
very dark complexion, the Kurmis closely resemble in feature the Dravidian
tribes around them. It is difficult to distinguish a Kurmi from a Bhumij or
Santāl, and the Santāls will take cooked food from them.”2 In the Central
Provinces they are fairly dark in complexion and of moderate height, and no
doubt of very mixed blood. Where the Kurmis and Kunbis meet the castes
sometimes amalgamate, and there is little doubt that various groups of
Kurmis settling in the Marātha country have become Kunbis, and Kunbis
migrating to northern India have become Kurmis. Each caste has certain
subdivisions whose names belong to the other. It has been seen in the article
on Kunbi that this caste is of very diverse origin, having assimilated large
bodies of persons from several other castes, and is probably to a
considerable extent recruited from the local non-Aryan tribes; if then the
Kurmis mix so readily with the Kunbis, the presumption is that they are of a
similar mixed origin, as otherwise they should consider themselves superior.
Mr. Crooke gives several names of subcastes showing the diverse
constitution of the Kurmis. Thus three, Gaharwār, Jādon and Chandel are the
names of Rājpūt clans; the Kori subcaste must be a branch of the low weaver
caste of that name; and in the Central Provinces the names of such subcastes
as the Agaria or iron-workers, the Lonhāre or salt-refiners, and the Khaira or

Page 82

catechu-collectors indicate that these Kurmis are derived from low Hindu
castes or the aboriginal tribes.

3. Subcastes

The caste has a large number of subdivisions. The Usrete belonged to
Bundelkhand, where this name is found in several castes; they are also
known as Havelia, because they live in the rich level tract of the Jubbulpore
Haveli, covered like a chessboard with large embanked wheat-fields. The
name Haveli seems to have signified a palace or headquarters of a ruler, and
hence was applied to the tract surrounding it, which was usually of special
fertility, and provided for the maintenance of the chief’s establishment and
household troops. Thus in Jubbulpore, Mandia and Betūl we find the forts of
the old Gond rulers dominating an expanse of rich plain-country. The Usrete
Kurmis abstain from meat and liquor, and may be considered as one of the
highest subcastes. Their name may be derived from a-sreshtha, or not the
best, and its significance would be that formerly they were considered to be
of mixed origin, like most castes in Bundelkhand. The group of Sreshtha or
best-born Kurmis has now, however, died out if it ever existed, and the
Usretes have succeeded in establishing themselves in its place. The
Chandnāhes of Jubbulpore or Chandnāhus of Chhattīsgarh are another large
subdivision. The name may be derived from the village Chandnoha in
Bundelkhand, but the Chandnāhus of Chhattīsgarh say that three or four
centuries ago a Rājpūt general of the Rāja of Ratanpur had been so
successful in war that the king allowed him to appear in Durbār in his
uniform with his forehead marked with sandalwood, as a special honour.
When he died his son continued to do the same, and on the king’s attention
being drawn to it he forbade him. But the son did not obey, and hence the
king ordered the sandalwood to be rubbed from his forehead in open Durbār.
But when this was done the mark miraculously reappeared through the
agency of the goddess Devi, whose favourite he was. Three times the king
had the mark rubbed out and three times it came again. So he was allowed to
wear it thereafter, and was called Chandan Singh from chandan,

Page 83

sandalwood; and his descendants are the Chandnāhu Kurmis. Another
derivation is from Chandra, the moon. In Jubbulpore these Chandnāhes
sometimes kill a pig under the palanquin of a newly married bride. In
Bilāspur they are prosperous and capable cultivators, but are generally
reputed to be stingy, and therefore are not very popular. Here they are
divided into the Ekbahinyas and Dobahinyas, or those who wear glass
bangles on one or both arms respectively. The Chandrāha Kurmis of Raipur
are probably a branch of the Chandnāhus. They sprinkle with water the
wood with which they are about to cook their food in order to purify it, and
will eat food only in the chauka or sanctified place in the house. At harvest
when they must take meals in the fields, one of them prepares a patch of
ground, cleaning and watering it, and there cooks food for them all.

The Singrore Kurmis derive their name from Singror, a place near
Allahābād. Singror is said to have once been a very important town, and the
Lodhis and other castes have subdivisions of this name. The Desha Kurmis
are a group of the Mungeli tahsīl of Bilāspur. Desh means one’s native
country, but in this case the name probably refers to Bundelkhand. Mr.
Gordon states3 that they do not rear poultry and avoid residing in villages in
which their neighbours keep poultry. The Santore Kurmis are a group found
in several Districts, who grow san-hemp,4 and are hence looked down upon
by the remainder of the caste. In Raipur the Mānwa Kurmis will also do this;
Māna is a word sometimes applied to a loom, and the Mānwa Kurmis may
be so called because they grow hemp and weave sacking from the fibres.
The Pataria are an inferior group in Bilāspur, who are similarly despised
because they grow hemp and will take their food in the fields in patris or
leaf-plates. The Gohbaiyān are considered to be an illegitimate group; the
name is said to signify ‘holding the arm.’ The Bāhargaiyan, or ‘those who
live outside the town,’ are another subcaste to which children born out of
wedlock are relegated. The Palkiha subcaste of Jubbulpore are said to be so
named because their ancestors were in the service of a certain Rāja and
spread his bedding for him; hence they are somewhat looked down on by the
others. The name may really be derived from palal, a kind of vegetable, and
they may originally have been despised for growing this vegetable, and thus
placing themselves on a level with the gardening castes. The Masūria take
their name from the masūr or lentil, a common cold-weather crop in the

Page 84

northern Districts, which is, however, grown by all Kurmis and other
cultivators; and the Agaria or iron-workers, the Kharia or catechu-makers,
and the Lonhāre or salt-makers, have already been mentioned. There are also
numerous local or territorial subcastes, as the Chaurasia or those living in a
Chaurāsi5 estate of eighty-four villages, the Pardeshi or foreigners, the
Bundelkhandi or those who came from Bundelkhand, the Kanaujias from
Oudh, the Gaur from northern India, and the Marāthe and Telenge or
Marāthas and Telugus; these are probably Kunbis who have been taken into
the caste. The Gabel are a small subcaste in Sakti State, who now prefer to
drop the name Kurmi and call themselves simply Gabel. The reason
apparently is that the other Kurmis about them sow san-hemp, and as they
have ceased doing this they try to separate themselves and rank above the
rest. But they call the bastard group of their community Rakhaut Kurmis,
and other people speak of all of them as Gabel Kurmis, so that there is no
doubt that they belong to the caste. It is said that formerly they were pack-
carriers, but have now abandoned this calling in favour of cultivation.

4. Exogamous groups

Each subcaste has a number of exogamous divisions and these present a
large variety of all types. Some groups have the names of Brāhman saints as
Sāndil, Bhāradwaj, Kausil and Kashyap; others are called after Rājpūt septs,
as Chauhān, Rāthor, Panwār and Solanki; other names are of villages, as
Khairagarhi from Khairagarh, Pandariha from Pandaria, Bhadaria, and
Harkotia from Harkoti; others are titular, as Sondeha, gold-bodied,
Sonkharchi, spender of gold, Bimba Lohir, stick-carrier, Banhpagar, one
wearing a thread on the arm, Bhandāri, a store-keeper, Kumaria, a potter, and
Shikaria, a hunter; and a large number are totemistic, named after plants,
animals or natural objects, as Sadāphal, a fruit; Kathail from kath or catechu;
Dhorha, from dhor, cattle; Kānsia, the kāns grass; Karaiya, a frying-pan;
Sarang, a peacock; Samundha, the ocean; Sindia, the date-palm tree; Dudhua
from dudh, milk, and so on. Some sections are subdivided; thus the Tidha
section, supposed to be named after a village, is divided into three

Page 85

subsections named Ghurepake, a mound of cowdung, Dwarparke, door-
jamb, and Jangi, a warrior, which are themselves exogamous. Similarly the
Chaudhri section, named after the title of the caste headman, is divided into
four subsections, two, Majhgawān Bamuria, named after villages, and two,
Purwa Thok and Pascham Thok, signifying the eastern and western groups.
Presumably when sections get so large as to bar the marriage of persons not
really related to each other at all, relief is obtained by subdividing them in
this manner. A list of the sections of certain subcastes so far as they have
been obtained is given at the end of the article.

Page 86

Pounding rice

5. Marriage rules. Betrothal

Page 87

Marriage is prohibited between members of the same section and between
first and second cousins on the mother’s side. But the Chandnāhe Kurmis
permit the wedding of a brother’s daughter to a sister’s son. Most Kurmis
forbid a man to marry his wife’s sister during her lifetime. The Chhattīsgarh
Kurmis have the practice of exchanging girls between two families. There is
usually no objection to marriage on account of religious differences within
the pale of Hinduism, but the difficulty of a union between a member of a
Vaishnava sect who abstains from flesh and liquor, and a partner who does
not, is felt and expressed in the following saying:

Vaishnava purush avaishnava nāri
Unt beil ki jot bichāri,

or ‘A Vaishnava husband with a non-Vaishnava wife is like a camel yoked
with a bullock.’ Muhammadans and Christians are not retained in the caste.
Girls are usually wedded between nine and eleven, but well-to-do Kurmis
like other agriculturists, sometimes marry their daughters when only a few
months old. The people say that when a Kurmi gets rich he will do three
things: marry his daughters very young and with great display, build a fine
house, and buy the best bullocks he can afford. The second and third
methods of spending his money are very sensible, whatever may be thought
of the first. No penalty is imposed for allowing a girl to exceed the age of
puberty before marriage. Boys are married between nine and fifteen years,
but the tendency is towards the postponement of the ceremony. The boy’s
father goes and asks for a bride and says to the girl’s father, ‘I have placed
my son with you,’ that is, given him in adoption; if the match be acceptable
the girl’s father replies, ‘Yes, I will give my daughter to collect cowdung for
you’; to which the boy’s father responds, ‘I will hold her as the apple of my
eye.’ Then the girl’s father sends the barber and the Brāhman to the boy’s
house, carrying a rupee and a cocoanut. The boy’s relatives return the visit
and perform the ‘God bharna,’ or ‘Filling the lap of the girl.’ They take some
sweetmeats, a rupee and a cocoanut, and place them in the girl’s lap, this
being meant to induce fertility. The ceremony of betrothal succeeds, when
the couple are seated together on a wooden plank and touch the feet of the
guests and are blessed by them. The auspicious date of the wedding is fixed

Page 88

by the Brāhman and intimation is given to the boy’s family through the
lagan or formal invitation, which is sent on a paper coloured yellow with
powdered rice and turmeric. A bride-price is paid, which in the case of well-
to-do families may amount to as much as Rs. 100 to Rs. 400.

6. The marriage-shed or pavilion

Before the wedding the women of the family go out and fetch new earth for
making the stoves on which the marriage feast will be cooked. When about
to dig they worship the earth by sprinkling water over it and offering flowers
and rice. The marriage-shed is made of the wood of the sāleh tree,6 because
this wood is considered to be alive. If a pole of sāleh is cut and planted in the
ground it takes root and sprouts, though otherwise the wood is quite useless.
The wood of the kekar tree has similar properties and may also be used. The
shed is covered with leaves of the mango or jāmun7 trees, because these
trees are evergreen and hence typify perpetual life. The marriage-post in the
centre of the shed is called Magrohan or Khām; the women go and worship
it at the carpenter’s house; two pice, a piece of turmeric and an areca-nut are
buried below it in the earth and a new thread and a toran or string of mango-
leaves is wound round it. Oil and turmeric are also rubbed on the marriage-
post at the same time as on the bride and bridegroom. In Saugor the
marriage-post is often a four-sided wooden frame or a pillar with four pieces
of wood suspended from it. The larger the marriage-shed is made the greater
honour accrues to the host, even though the guests may be insufficient to fill
it. In towns it has often to be made in the street and is an obstacle to traffic.
There may be eight or ten posts besides the centre one.

7. The marriage-cakes

Page 89

Another preliminary ceremony is the family sacrament of the Meher or
marriage-cakes. Small balls of wheat-flour are kneaded and fried in an
earthen pan with sesamum oil by the eldest woman of the family. No metal
vessel may be used to hold the water, flour or oil required for these cakes,
probably because earthen vessels were employed before metal ones and are
therefore considered more sacred. In measuring the ingredients a quarter of a
measure is always taken in excess, such as a seer8 and a quarter for a seer of
wheat, to foreshadow the perpetual increase of the family. When made the
cakes are offered to the Kul Deo or household god. The god is worshipped
and the bride and bridegroom then first partake of the cakes and after them
all members of the family and relatives. Married daughters and daughters-in-
law may eat of the cakes, but not widows, who are probably too impure to
join in a sacred sacrament Every person admitted to partake of the marriage-
cakes is held to belong to the family, so that all other members of it have to
observe impurity for ten days after a birth or death has occurred in his house
and shave their heads for a death. When the family is so large that this
becomes irksome it is cut down by not inviting persons beyond seven
degrees of relationship to the Meher sacrament This exclusion has
sometimes led to bitter quarrels and actions for defamation. It seems likely
that the Meher may be a kind of substitute for the sacrificial meal, at which
all the members of the clan ate the body of the totem or divine animal, and
some similar significance perhaps once attached to the wedding-cake in
England, pieces of which are sent to relatives unable to be present at the
wedding.

8. Customs at the wedding

Before the wedding the women of each party go and anoint the village gods
with oil and turmeric, worshipping them, and then similarly anoint the bride
and bridegroom at their respective houses for three days. The bridegroom’s
head is shaved except for his scalp-lock; he wears a silver necklet on his
neck, puts lamp-black on his eyes, and is dressed in new yellow and white
clothes. Thus attired he goes round and worships all the village gods and

Page 90

visits the houses of his relatives and friends, who mark his forehead with rice
and turmeric and give him a silver piece. A list of the money thus received is
made and similar presents are returned to the donors when they have
weddings. The bridegroom goes to the wedding either in a litter or on a
horse, and must not look behind him. After being received at the bride’s
village and conducted to his lodging, he proceeds to the bride’s house and
strikes a grass mat hung before the house seven times with a reed-stick. On
entering the bride’s house the bridegroom is taken to worship her family
gods, the men of the party usually remaining outside. Then, as he goes
through the room, one of the women who has tied a long thread round her
toe gets behind him and measures his height with the thread without his
seeing. She breaks off the thread at his height and doubling it once or twice
sews it round the top of the bride’s skirt, and they think that as long as the
bride wears this thread she will be able to make her husband do as she likes.
If the girls wish to have a joke they take one of the bridegroom’s shoes
which he has left outside the house, wrap it up in a piece of cloth, and place
it on a shelf or in a cupboard, where the family god would be kept, with two
lamps burning before it. Then they say to the bridegroom, ‘Come and
worship our household god’; and if he goes and does reverence to it they
unwrap the cloth and show him his own shoe and laugh at him. But if he has
been to one or two weddings and knows the joke he just gives it a kick. The
bride’s younger brother steals the bridegroom’s other shoe and hides it, and
will not give it back without a present of a rupee or two. The bride and
bridegroom are seated on wooden seats, and while the Brāhman recites texts,
they make the following promises. The bridegroom covenants to live with
his wife and her children, to support them and tell her all his concerns,
consult her, make her a partner of his religious worship and almsgiving, and
be with her on the night following the termination of her monthly impurity.
The bride promises to remain faithful to her husband, to obey his wishes and
orders, to perform her household duties as well as she can, and not to go
anywhere without his permission. The last promise of the bridegroom has
reference to the general rule among Hindus that a man should always sleep
with his wife on the night following the termination of her menses because
at this time she is most likely to conceive and the prospect of a child being
born must not be lost. The Shāstras lay it down that a man should not visit
his wife before going into battle, this being no doubt an instance of the

Page 91

common custom of abstinence from conjugal intercourse prior to some
important business or undertaking; but it is stated that if on such an occasion
she should have just completed a period of impurity and have bathed and
should desire him to come in to her, he should do so, even with his armour
on, because by refusing, in the event of his being killed in battle, the chance
of a child being born would be finally lost. To Hindu ideas the neglect to
produce life is a sin of the same character, though in a minor degree, as that
of destroying life; and it is to be feared that it will be some time before this
ingrained superstition gives way to any considerations of prudential restraint
Some people say that for a man not to visit his wife at this time is as great a
sin as murder.

9. Walking round the sacred post

The binding ceremony of the marriage is the walking seven times round the
marriage-post in the direction of the sun. The post probably represents the
sun and the walk of the bridal couple round it may be an imitation of the
movement of the planets round the sun. The reverence paid to the marriage-
post has already been noticed. During the procession the bride leads and the
bridegroom puts his left hand on her left shoulder. The household pounding-
slab is near the post and on it are placed seven little heaps of rice, turmeric,
areca-nut, and a small winnowing-fan. Each time the bride passes the slab
the bridegroom catches her right foot and with it makes her brush one of the
little heaps off the slab. These seven heaps represent the seven Rishis or
saints who are the seven large stars of the constellation of the Great Bear.

10. Other ceremonies

Page 92

After the wedding the bride and bridegroom resume their seats and the
parents of the bride wash their feet in a brass tray, marking their foreheads
with rice and turmeric. They put some silver in the tray, and other relations
and friends do the same. The presents thus collected go to the bridegroom.
The Chandnāhu Kurmis then have a ceremony known as palkachār. The
bride’s father provides a bed on which a mattress and quilt are laid and the
bride and bridegroom are seated on it, while their brother and sister sprinkle
parched rice round them. This is supposed to typify the consummation of the
marriage, but the ceremony is purely formal as the bridal couple are
children. The bridegroom is given two lamps and he has to mix their flames,
probably to symbolise the mixing of the spirits of his wife and himself. He
requires a present of a rupee or two before he consents to do so. During the
wedding the bride is bathed in the same water as the bridegroom, the joint
use of the sacred element being perhaps another symbolic mark of their
union. At the feasts the bride eats rice and milk with her husband from one
dish, once at her own house and once after she goes to her husband’s house.
Subsequently she never eats with her husband but always after him. She also
sits and eats at the wedding-feasts with her husband’s relations. This is
perhaps meant to mark her admission into her husband’s clan. After the
wedding the Brāhmans on either side recite Sanskrit verses, praising their
respective families and displaying their own learning. The competition often
becomes bitter and would end in a quarrel, but that the elders of the party
interfere and stop it.

The expenses of an ordinary wedding on the bridegroom’s side may be Rs.
100 in addition to the bride-price, and on the bride’s Rs. 200. The bride goes
home for a day or two with the bridegroom’s party in Chhattīsgarh but not in
the northern Districts, as women accompany the wedding procession in the
former but not in the latter locality. If she is too small to go, her shoes and
marriage-crown are sent to represent her. When she attains maturity the
chauk or gauna ceremony is performed, her husband going to fetch her with
a few friends. At this time her parents give her clothes, food and ornaments
in a basket called jhanpi or tipara specially prepared for the occasion.

Page 93

11. Polygamy widow-marriage and divorce

A girl who becomes pregnant by a man of the caste before marriage is
wedded to him by the rite used for widows. If the man is an outsider she is
expelled from the community. Women are much valued for the sake of their
labour in the fields, and the transgressions of a wife are viewed with a
lenient eye. In Damoh it is said that a man readily condones his wife’s
adultery with another Kurmi, and if it becomes known and she is put out of
caste, he will give the penalty feasts himself for her admission. If she is
detected in a liaison with an outsider she is usually discarded, but the
offence may be condoned should the man be a Brāhman. And one instance is
mentioned of a mālguzār’s wife who had gone wrong with a Gond, and was
forgiven and taken back by her husband and the caste. But the leniency was
misplaced as she subsequently eloped with an Ahīr. Polygamy is usual with
those who can afford to pay for several wives, as a wife’s labour is more
efficient and she is a more profitable investment than a hired servant. An
instance is on record of a blind Kurmi in Jubbulpore, who had nine wives. A
man who is faithful to one wife, and does not visit her on fast-days, is called
a Brahmachari or saint and it is thought that he will go to heaven. The
remarriage of widows is permitted and is usual. The widow goes to a well on
some night in the dark fortnight, and leaving her old clothes there puts on
new ones which are given to her by the barber’s wife. She then fills a pitcher
with water and takes it to her new husband’s house. He meets her on the
threshold and lifts it from her head, and she goes into the house and puts
bangles on her wrists. The following saying shows that the second marriage
of widows is looked upon as quite natural and normal by the cultivating
castes:

“If the clouds are like partridge feathers it will rain, and if a widow puts
lamp-black on her eyes she will marry again; these things are certain.”9

Page 94

A bachelor marrying a widow must first go through the ceremony with a ring
which he thereafter wears on his finger, and if it is lost he must perform a
funeral ceremony as if a wife had died. If a widower marries a girl she must
wear round her neck an image of his first wife. A girl who is twice married
by going round the sacred post is called Chandelia and is most unlucky. She
is considered as bad or worse than a widow, and the people sometimes make
her live outside the village and forbid her to show them her face. Divorce is
open to either party, to a wife on account of the impotency or ill-treatment of
her husband, and to a husband for the bad character, ill-health or
quarrelsome disposition of his wife. A deed of divorce is executed and
delivered before the caste committee.

12. Impurity of women

During her periodical impurity, which lasts for four or five days, a woman
should not sleep on a cot. She must not walk across the shadow of any man
not her husband, because it is thought that if she does so her next child will
be like that man. Formerly she did not see her husband’s face for all these
days, but this rule was too irksome and has been abandoned. She should eat
the same kind of food for the whole period, and therefore must take nothing
special on one day which she cannot get on other days. At this time she will
let her hair hang loose, taking out all the cotton strings by which it is tied
up.10 These strings, being cotton, have become impure, and must be thrown
away. But if there is no other woman to do the household work and she has
to do it herself, she will keep her hair tied up for convenience, and only
throw away the strings on the last day when she bathes. All cotton things are
rendered impure by her at this time, and any cloth or other article which she
touches must be washed before it can be touched by anybody else; but
woollen cloth, being sacred, is not rendered impure, and she can sleep on a
woollen blanket without its thereby becoming a defilement to other persons.
When bathing at the end of the period a woman should see no other face but
her husband’s; but as her husband is usually not present, she wears a ring
with a tiny mirror and looks at her own face in this as a substitute.

Page 95

If a woman desires to procure a miscarriage she eats a raw papāya fruit, and
drinks a mixture of ginger, sugar, bamboo leaves and milk boiled together.
She then has her abdomen well rubbed by a professional masseuse, who
comes at a time when she can escape observation. After a prolonged course
of this treatment it is said that a miscarriage is obtained. It would seem that
the rubbing is the only treatment which is directly effective. The papāya,
which is a very digestible fruit, can hardly be of assistance, but may be eaten
from some magical idea of its resemblance to a foetus. The mixture drunk is
perhaps designed to be a tonic to the stomach against the painful effects of
the massage.

13. Pregnancy rites

As regards pregnancy Mr. Marten writes as follows:11 “A woman in
pregnancy is in a state of taboo and is peculiarly liable to the influence of
magic and in some respects dangerous to others. She is exempt from the
observance of fasts, is allowed any food she fancies, and is fed with sweets
and all sorts of rich food, especially in the fifth month. She should not visit
her neighbour’s houses nor sleep in any open place. Her clothes are kept
separate from others. She is subject to a large number of restrictions in her
ordinary life with a view of avoiding everything that might prejudice or
retard her delivery. She should eschew all red clothes or red things of any
sort, such as suggest blood, till the third or fourth month, when conception is
certain. She will be careful not to touch the dress of any woman who has had
a miscarriage. She will not cross running water, as it might cause premature
delivery, nor go near a she-buffalo or a mare lest delivery be retarded, since
a mare is twelve months in foal. If she does by chance approach these
animals she must propitiate them by offerings of grain. Nor in some cases
will she light a lamp, for fear the flame in some way may hurt the child. She
should not finish any sowing, previously begun, during pregnancy, nor
should her husband thatch the house or repair his axe. An eclipse is
particularly dangerous to the unborn child and she must not leave the house
during its continuance, but must sit still with a stone pestle in her lap and

Page 96

anoint her womb with cowdung. Under no circumstances must she touch any
cutting instrument as it might cause her child to be born mutilated.

“During the fifth month of pregnancy the family gods are worshipped to
avoid generally any difficulties in her labour. Towards the end of that month
and sometimes in the seventh month she rubs her body with a preparation of
gram-flour, castor-oil and turmeric, bathes herself, and is clothed with new
garments and seated on a wooden stool in a space freshly cleaned and spread
with cowdung. Her lap is then filled with sweets called pakwān made of
cocoanut. A similar ceremony called Boha Jewan is sometimes performed in
the seventh or eighth month, when a new sāri is given to her and grain is
thrown into her lap. Another special rite is the Pansavan ceremony,
performed to remove all defects in the child, give it a male form, increase its
size and beauty, give it wisdom and avert the influence of evil spirits.”

14. Earth-eating

Pregnant women sometimes have a craving for eating earth. They eat the
earth which has been mixed with wheat on the threshing-floor, or the ashes
of cowdung cakes which have been used for cooking. They consider it as a
sort of medicine which will prevent them from vomiting. Children also
sometimes get the taste for eating earth, licking it up from the floor, or
taking pieces of lime-plaster from the walls. Possibly they may be attracted
by the saltish taste, but the result is that they get ill and their stomachs are
distended. The Panwar women of Bālāghāt eat red and white clay in order
that their children may be born with red and white complexions.

15. Customs at birth

Page 97

During the period of labour the barber’s wife watches over the case, but as
delivery approaches hands it over to a recognised midwife, usually the
Basorin or Chamārin, who remains in the lying-in room till about the tenth
day after delivery. “If delivery is retarded,” Mr. Marten continues,12
“pressure and massage are used, but coffee and other herbal decoctions are
given, and various means, mostly depending on sympathetic magic, are
employed to avert the adverse spirits and hasten and ease the labour. She
may be given water to drink in which the feet of her husband13 or her
mother-in-law or a young unmarried girl have been dipped, or she is shown
the swastik or some other lucky sign, or the chakra-vyuha, a spiral figure
showing the arrangement of the armies of the Pāndavas and Kauravas which
resembles the intestines with the exit at the lower end.”

The menstrual blood of the mother during child-birth is efficacious as a
charm for fertility. The Nāin or Basorin will sometimes try and dip her big
toe into it and go to her house. There she will wash her toe and give the
water to a barren woman, who by drinking it will transfer to herself the
fertility of the woman whose blood it is. The women of the family are in the
lying-in room and they watch her carefully, while some of the men stand
about outside. If they see the midwife coming out they examine her, and if
they find any blood exclaim, ‘You have eaten of our salt and will you play us
this trick’; and they force her back into the room where the blood is washed
off. All the stained clothes are washed in the birth-room, and the water as
well as that in which the mother and child are bathed is poured into a hole
dug inside the room, so that none of it may be used as a charm.

16. Treatment of mother and child

The great object of the treatment after birth is to prevent the mother and
child from catching cold. They appear to confuse the symptoms of
pneumonia and infantile lockjaw in a disease called sanpāt, to the prevention
of which their efforts are directed. A sigri or stove is kept alight under the
bed, and in this the seeds of ajwāin or coriander are burnt. The mother eats

Page 98

the seeds, and the child is waved over the stove in the smoke of the burning
ajwāin. Raw asafoetida is put in the woman’s ears wrapped in cotton-wool,
and she eats a little half-cooked. A freshly-dried piece of cowdung is also
picked up from the ground and half-burnt and put in water, and some of this
water is given to her to drink, the process being repeated every day for a
month. Other details of the treatment of the mother and child after birth are
given in the articles on Mehtar and Kunbi. For the first five days after birth
the child is given a little honey and calf’s urine mixed. If the child coughs it
is given bans-lochan, which is said to be some kind of silicate found in
bamboos. The mother does not suckle the child for three days, and for that
period she is not washed and nobody goes near her, at least in Mandla. On
the third day after the birth of a girl, or the fourth after that of a boy, the
mother is washed and the child is then suckled by her for the first time, at an
auspicious moment pointed out by the astrologer. Generally speaking the
whole treatment of child-birth is directed towards the avoidance of various
imaginary magical dangers, while the real sanitary precautions and other
assistance which should be given to the mother are not only totally
neglected, but the treatment employed greatly aggravates the ordinary risks
which a woman has to take, especially in the middle and higher castes.

17. Ceremonies after birth

When a boy is born the father’s younger brother or one of his friends lets off
a gun and beats a brass plate to proclaim the event The women often
announce the birth of a boy by saying that it is a one-eyed girl. This is in
case any enemy should hear the mention of the boy’s birth, and the envy felt
by him should injure the child. On the sixth day after the birth the Chhathi
ceremony is performed and the mother is given ordinary food to eat, as
described in the article on Kunbi. The twelfth day is known as Barhon or
Chauk. On this day the father is shaved for the first time after the child’s
birth. The mother bathes and cuts the nails of her hands and feet; if she is
living by a river she throws them into it, otherwise on to the roof of the
house. The father and mother sit in the chauk or space marked out for

Page 99

worship with cowdung and flour; the woman is on the man’s left side, a
woman being known as Bāmangi or the left limb, either because the left limb
is weak or because woman is supposed to have been made from man’s left
side, as in Genesis. The household god is brought into the chauk and they
worship it. The Bua or husband’s sister brings presents to the mother known
as bharti, for filling her lap: silver or gold bangles if she can afford them, a
coat and cap for the boy; dates, rice and a breast-cloth for the mother; for the
father a rupee and a cocoanut. These things are placed in the mother’s lap as
a charm to sustain her fertility. The father gives his sister back double the
value of the presents if he can afford it. He gives her husband a head-cloth
and shoulder-cloth; he waves two or three pice round his wife’s head and
gives them to the barber’s wife. The latter and the midwife take the clothes
worn by the mother at child-birth, and the father gives them each a new cloth
if he can afford it. The part of the navel-string which falls off the child’s
body is believed to have the power of rendering a barren woman fertile, and
is also intimately connected with the child’s destiny. It is therefore carefully
preserved and buried in some auspicious place, as by the bank of a river.

In the sixth month the Pasni ceremony is performed, when the child is given
grain for the first time, consisting of rice and milk. Brāhmans or religious
mendicants are invited and fed. The child’s hair and nails are cut for the first
time on the Shivrātri or Akti festival following the birth, and are wrapped up
in a ball of dough and thrown into a sacred river. If a child is born during an
eclipse they think that it will suffer from lung disease; so a silver model of
the moon is made immediately during the eclipse, and hung round the child’s
neck, and this is supposed to preserve it from harm.

18. Suckling children

A Hindu woman will normally suckle her child for two to three years after
its birth, and even beyond this up to six years if it sleeps with her. But they
think that the child becomes short of breath if suckled for so long, and advise
the mother to wean it. And if she becomes pregnant again, when she has

Page 100

been three or four months in this condition, she will wean the child by
putting nīm leaves or some other bitter thing on her breasts. A Hindu should
not visit his wife for the last six months of her pregnancy nor until the child
has been fed with grain for the first time six months after its birth. During
the former period such action is thought to be a sin, while during the latter it
may have the effect of rendering the mother pregnant again too quickly, and
hence may not allow her a sufficiently long period to suckle the first child.

19. Beliefs about twins

Twins, Mr. Marten states, are not usually considered to be inauspicious.14 “It
is held that if they are of the same sex they will survive, and if they are of a
different sex one of them will die. Boy twins are called Rāma and
Lachhman, a boy and a girl Mahādeo and Pārvati, and two girls Ganga and
Jamuni or Sīta and Konda. They should always be kept separate so as to
break the essential connection which exists between them and may cause
any misfortune which happens to the one to extend to the other. Thus the
mother always sleeps between them in bed and never carries both of them
nor suckles both at the same time. Again, among some castes in
Chhattīsgarh, when the twins are of different sex, they are considered to be
pāp (sinful) and are called Pāpi and Pāpin, an allusion to the horror of a
brother and sister sharing the same bed (the mother’s womb).” Hindus think
that if two people comb their hair with the same comb they will lose their
affection for each other. Hence the hair of twins is combed with the same
comb to weaken the tie which exists between them, and may cause the
illness or death of either to follow on that of the other.

20. Disposal of the dead

Page 101

The dead are usually burnt with the head to the north. Children whose ears
have not been bored and adults who die of smallpox or leprosy are buried,
and members of poor families who cannot afford firewood. If a person has
died by hanging or drowning or from the bite of a snake, his body is burnt
without any rites, but in order that his soul may be saved, the hom sacrifice
is performed subsequently to the cremation. Those who live near the
Nerbudda and Mahānadi sometimes throw the bodies of the dead into these
rivers and think that this will make them go to heaven. The following
account of a funeral ceremony among the middle and higher castes in Saugor
is mainly furnished by Major W. D. Sutherland, I.M.S., with some additions
from Mandla, and from material furnished by the Rev. E. M. Gordon:15
“When a man is near his end, gifts to Brāhmans are made by him, or by his
son on his behalf. These, if he is a rich man, consist of five cows with their
calves, marked on the forehead and hoofs with turmeric, and with garlands
of flowers round their necks. Ordinary people give the price of one calf,
which is fictitiously taken at Rs. 3–4, Rs. 1–4, ten annas or five annas
according to their means. By holding on to the tail of this calf the dead man
will be able to swim across the dreadful river Vaitarni, the Hindu Styx. This
calf is called Bachra Sānkal or ‘the chain-calf,’ as it furnishes a chain across
the river, and it may be given three times, once before the death and twice
afterwards. When near his end the dying man is taken down from his cot and
laid on a woollen blanket spread on the ground, perhaps with the idea that he
should at death be in contact with the earth and not suspended in mid-air as a
man on a cot is held to be. In his mouth are placed a piece of gold, some
leaves of the tulsi or basil plant, or Ganges water, or rice cooked in
Jagannāth’s temple. The dying man keeps on repeating ‘Rām, Rām,
Sitārām.’”

21. Funeral rites

As soon as death occurs the corpse is bathed, clothed and smeared with a
mixture of powdered sandalwood, camphor and spices. A bier is constructed
of planks, or if this cannot be afforded the man’s cot is turned upside down

Page 102

and the body is carried out for burial on it in this fashion, with the legs of the
cot pointing upwards. Straw is laid on the bier, and the corpse, covered with
fine white cloth, is tied securely on to it, the hands being crossed on the
breast, with the thumbs and great toes tied together. When a married woman
dies she is covered with a red cloth which reaches only to the neck, and her
face is left open to the view of everybody, whether she went abroad unveiled
in her life or not. It is considered a highly auspicious thing for a woman to
die in the lifetime of her husband and children, and the corpse is sometimes
dressed like a bride and ornaments put on it. The corpse of a widow or girl is
wrapped in a white cloth with the head covered. At the head of the funeral
procession walks the son of the deceased, or other chief mourner, and in his
hand he takes smouldering cowdung cakes in an earthen pot, from which the
pyre will be kindled. This fire is brought from the hearth of the house by the
barber, and he sometimes also carries it to the pyre. On the way the
mourners change places so that each may assist in bearing the bier, and once
they set the bier on the ground and leave two pice and some grain where it
lay, before taking it up again. After the funeral each person who has helped
to carry it takes up a clod of earth and with it touches successively the place
on his shoulder where the bier rested, his waist and his knee, afterwards
dropping the clod on the ground. It is believed that by so doing he removes
from his shoulder the weight of the corpse, which would otherwise press on
it for some time.

22. Burning the dead

At the cremation-ground the corpse is taken from the bier and placed on the
pyre. The cloth which covered it and that on which it lay are given to a
sweeper, who is always present to receive this perquisite. To the corpse’s
mouth, eyes, ears, nostrils and throat is applied a mixture of barley-flour,
butter, sesamum seeds and powdered sandalwood. Logs of wood and
cowdung cakes are then piled on the body and the pyre is fired by the son,
who first holds a burning stick to the mouth of the corpse as if to inform it
that he is about to apply the fire. The pyre of a man is fired at the head and

Page 103

of a woman at the foot. Rich people burn the corpse with sandalwood, and
others have a little of this, and incense and sweet-smelling gum. Nowadays
if the rain comes on and the pyre will not burn they use kerosine oil. When
the body is half-consumed the son takes up a piece of wood and with it
strikes the skull seven times, to break it and give exit to the soul. This,
however, is not always done. The son then takes up on his right shoulder an
earthen pot full of water, at the bottom of which is a small hole. He walks
round the pyre three times in the direction of the sun’s course and stands
facing to the south, and dashes the pot on the ground, crying out in his grief,
‘Oh, my father.’ While this is going on mantras or sacred verses are recited
by the officiating Brāhman. When the corpse is partly consumed each
member of the assembly throws the Pānch lakariya (five pieces of wood or
sprigs of basil) on to the pyre, making obeisance to the deceased and saying,
‘Swarg ko jao,’ or ‘Ascend to heaven.’ Or they may say, ‘Go, become
incarnate in some human being.’ They stay by the corpse for 1¼ pahars or
watches or some four hours, until either the skull is broken by the chief
mourner or breaks of itself with a crack. Then they bathe and come home
and after some hours again return to the corpse, to see that it is properly
burnt. If the pyre should go out and a dog or other animal should get hold of
the corpse when it is half-burnt, all the relatives are put out of caste, and
have to give a feast to all the caste, costing for a rich family about Rs. 50 and
for a poor one Rs. 10 to Rs. 15. Then they return home and chew nīm leaves,
which are bitter and purifying, and spit them out of their mouth, thus
severing their connection with the corpse. When the mourners have left the
deceased’s house the women of the family bathe, the bangles of the widow
are broken, the vermilion on the parting of her hair and the glass ornament
(tikli) on her forehead are removed, and she is clad in white clothing of
coarse texture to show that henceforth she is only a widow.

On the third day the mourners go again and collect the ashes and throw them
into the nearest river. The bones are placed in a silken bag or an earthen pot
or a leaf basket, and taken to the Ganges or Nerbudda within ten days if
possible, or otherwise after a longer interval, being buried meantime. Some
milk, salt and calfs urine are sprinkled over the place where the corpse was
burnt. These will cool the place, and the soul of the dead will similarly be
cooled, and a cow will probably come and lick up the salt, and this will

Page 104

sanctify the place and also the soul. When the bones are to be taken to a
sacred river they are tied up in a little piece of cloth and carried at the end of
a stick by the chief mourner, who is usually accompanied by several caste-
fellows. At night during the journey this stick is planted in the ground, so
that the bones may not touch the earth.

23. Burial

Graves are always dug from north to south. Some people say that heaven is
to the north, being situated in the Himalayas, and others that In the Satyug or
Golden Age the sun rose to the north. The digging of the grave only
commences on the arrival of the funeral party, so there is of necessity a delay
of several hours at the site, and all who attend a funeral are supposed to help
in digging. It is considered to be meritorious to assist at a burial, and there is
a saying that a man who has himself conducted a hundred funerals will
become a Rāja in his next birth. When the grave has been filled in and a
mound raised to mark the spot, each person present makes five small balls of
earth and places them in a heap at the head of the grave. This custom is also
known as Pānch lakariya, and must therefore be an imitation of the placing
of the five sticks on the pyre; its original meaning in the latter case may have
been that the mourners should assist the family by bringing a contribution of
wood to the pyre. As adopted in burial it seems to have no special
significance, but somewhat resembles the European custom of the mourners
throwing a little dust into the grave.

24. Return of the soul

On the third day the pindas or sacrificial cakes are offered and this goes on
till the tenth day. These cakes are not eaten by the priest or Mahā-Brāhman,

Page 105

but are thrown into a river. On the evening of the third day the son goes,
accompanied by a Brāhman and a barber, and carrying a key to avert evil, to
a pīpal16 tree, on whose branches he hangs two earthen pots: one containing
water, which trickles out through a hole in the bottom, and the other a lamp.
On each succeeding night the son replenishes the contents of these pots,
which are intended to refresh the spirit of the deceased and to light it on its
way to the lower world. In some localities on the evening of the third day the
ashes of the cooking-place are sifted, and laid out on a tray at night on the
spot where the deceased died, or near the cooking-place. In the morning the
layer of ashes is inspected, and if what appears to be a hand- or footprint is
seen, it is held that the spirit of the deceased has visited the house. Some
people look for handprints, some for footprints, and some for both, and the
Nais look for the print of a cow’s hoof, which when seen is held to prove
that the deceased in consideration of his singular merits has been reborn a
cow. If a woman has died in child-birth, or after the birth of a child and
before the performance of the sixth-day ceremony of purification, her hands
are tied with a cotton thread when she is buried, in order that her spirit may
be unable to rise and trouble the living. It is believed that the souls of such
women become evil spirits or Churels. Thorns are also placed over her grave
for the same purpose.

25. Mourning

During the days of mourning the chief mourner sits apart and does no work.
The others do their work but do not touch any one else, as they are impure.
They leave their hair unkempt, do not worship the gods nor sleep on cots,
and abjure betel, milk, butter, curds, meat, the wearing of shoes, new clothes
and other luxuries. In these days the friends of the family come and comfort
the mourners with conversation on the shortness and uncertainty of human
life and kindred topics. During the period of mourning when the family go to
bathe they march one behind the other in Indian file. And on the last day all
the people of the village accompany them, the men first and after they have
returned the women, all marching one behind the other. They also come back

Page 106

in this manner from the actual funeral, and the idea is perhaps to prevent the
dead man’s spirit from following them. He would probably feel impelled to
adopt the same formation and fall in behind the last of the line, and then
some means is devised, such as spreading thorns in the path, for leaving him
behind.

26. Shaving, and presents to Brahmans

On the ninth, tenth or eleventh day the males of the family have the front of
the head from the crown, and the beard and moustaches, shaved in token of
mourning. The Mahā-Brāhman who receives the gifts for the dead is shaved
with them. This must be done for an elder relation, but a man need not be
shaved on the death of his wife, sister or children. The day is the end of
mourning and is called Gauri Ganesh, Gauri being Pārvati or the wife of
Siva, and Ganesh the god of good fortune. On the occasion the family give
to the Mahā-Brāhman17 a new cot and bedding with a cloth, an umbrella to
shield the spirit from the sun’s rays, a copper vessel full of water to quench
its thirst, a brass lamp to guide it on its journey, and if the family is well-to-
do a horse and a cow, All these things are meant to be for the use of the dead
man in the other world. It is also the Brāhman’s business to eat a quantity of
cooked food, which will form the dead man’s food. It is of great spiritual
importance to the dead man’s soul that the Brāhman should finish the dish
set before him, and if he does not do so the soul will fare badly. He takes
advantage of this by stopping in the middle of the meal, saying that he has
eaten all he is capable of and cannot go on, so that the relations have to give
him large presents to induce him to finish the food. These Mahā-Brāhmans
are utterly despised and looked down on by all other Brāhmans and by the
community generally, and are sometimes made to live outside the village.
The regular priest, the Malai or Purohit, can accept no gifts from the time of
the death to the end of the period of mourning. Afterwards he also receives
presents in money according to the means of his clients, which it is supposed
will benefit the dead man’s soul in the next world; but no disgrace attaches
to the acceptance of these.

Page 107

27. End of mourning

When the mourning is complete on the Gauri-Ganesh day all the relatives
take their food at the chief mourner’s house, and afterwards the panchāyat
invest him with a new turban provided by a relative. On the next bazār day
the members of the panchāyat take him to the bazār and tell him to take up
his regular occupation and earn his livelihood. Thereafter all his relatives
and friends invite him to take food at their houses, probably to mark his
accession to the position of head of the family.

28. Anniversaries of the dead

Three months, six months and twelve months after the death presents are
made to a Brāhman, consisting of Sīdha, or butter, wheat and rice for a day’s
food. The anniversaries of the dead are celebrated during Pitripaksh or the
dark fortnight of Kunwār (September-October). If a man died on the third
day of any fortnight in the year, his anniversary is celebrated on the third day
of this fortnight and so on. On that day it is supposed that his spirit will visit
his earthly house where his relatives reside. But the souls of women all
return to their homes on the ninth day of the fortnight, and on the thirteenth
day come the souls of all those who have met with a violent death, as by a
fall, or have been killed by wild animals or snakes. The spirits of such
persons are supposed, on account of their untimely end, to entertain a special
grudge against the living.

Page 108

29. Beliefs in the hereafter

As regards the belief in the hereafter Mr. Gordon writes:18 “That they have
the idea of hell as a place of punishment may be gathered from the belief
that when salt is spilt the one who does this will in Pātāl or the infernal
region have to gather up each grain of salt with his eyelids. Salt is for this
reason handed round with great care, and it is considered unlucky to receive
it in the palm of the hand; it is therefore invariably taken in a cloth or vessel.
There is a belief that the spirit of the deceased hovers round familiar scenes
and places, and on this account, whenever possible, a house in which any
one has died is destroyed or deserted. After the spirit has wandered round
restlessly for a certain time it is said that it will again become incarnate and
take the form either of man or of one of the lower animals.” In Mandla they
think that the soul after death is arraigned and judged before Yama, and is
then chained to a flaming pillar for a longer or shorter period according to its
sins. The gifts made to Brāhmans for the dead somewhat shorten the period.
After that time it is born again with a good or bad body and human or animal
according to its deserts.

30. Religion. Village gods

The caste worship the principal Hindu deities. Either Bhagwān or
Parmeshwar is usually referred to as the supreme deity, as we speak of God.
Bhagwān appears to be Vishnu or the Sun, and Parmeshwar is Siva or
Mahādeo. There are few temples to Vishnu in villages, but none are required
as the sun is daily visible. Sunday or Raviwār is the day sacred to him, and
some people fast in his honour on Sundays, eating only one meal without
salt. A man salutes the sun after he gets up by joining his hands and looking

Page 109

towards it, again when he has washed his face, and a third time when he has
bathed, by throwing a little water in the sun’s direction. He must not spit in
front of the sun nor perform the lower functions of the body in its sight.
Others say that the sun and moon are the eyes of God, and the light of the
sun is the effulgence of God, because by its light and heat all moving and
immobile creatures sustain their life and all corn and other products of the
earth grow. In his incarnations of Rāma and Krishna there are temples to
Vishnu in large villages and towns. Khermāta, the mother of the village, is
the local form of Devi or the earth-goddess. She has a small hut and an
image of Devi, either black or red. She is worshipped by a priest called
Panda, who may be of any caste except the impure castes. The earth is
worshipped in various ways. A man taking medicine for the first time in an
illness sprinkles a few drops on the earth in its honour. Similarly for the first
three or four times that a cow is milked after the birth of a calf the stream is
allowed to fall on the ground. A man who is travelling offers a little food to
the earth before eating himself. Devi is sometimes considered to be one of
seven sisters, but of the others only two are known, Marhai Devi, the
goddess of cholera, and Sitala Devi, the goddess of smallpox. When an
epidemic of cholera breaks out the Panda performs the following ceremony
to avert it. He takes a kid and a small pig or chicken, and some cloth, cakes,
glass bangles, vermilion, an earthen lamp, and some country liquor, which is
sprinkled all along the way from where he starts to where he stops. He
proceeds in this manner to the boundary of the village at a place where there
are cross-roads, and leaves all the things there. Sometimes the animals are
sacrificed and eaten. While the Panda is doing this every one collects the
sweepings of his house in a winnowing-fan and throws them outside the
village boundary, at the same time ringing a bell continuously. The Panda
must perform his ceremony at night and, if possible, on the day of the new
moon. He is accompanied by a few other low-caste persons called Gunias. A
Gunia is one who can be possessed by a spirit in the temple of Khermāta.
When possessed he shakes his head up and down violently and foams at the
mouth, and sometimes strikes his head on the ground. Another favourite
godling is Hardaul, who was the brother of Jujhār Singh, Rāja of Orchha,
and was suspected by Jujhār Singh of loving the latter’s wife, and poisoned
in consequence by his orders. Hardaul has a platform and sometimes a hut
with an image of a man on horseback carrying a spear in his hand. His shrine

Page 110

is outside the village, and two days before a marriage the women of the
family visit his shrine and cook and eat their food there and invite him to the
wedding. Clay horses are offered to him, and he is supposed to be able to
keep off rain and storms during the ceremony. Hardaul is perhaps the deified
Rājpūt horseman. Hanumān or Mahābīr is represented by an image of a
monkey coloured with vermilion, with a club in his hand and a slain man
beneath his feet. He is principally worshipped on Saturdays so that he may
counteract the evil influences exercised by the planet Saturn on that day. His
image is painted with oil mixed with vermilion and has a wreath of flowers
of the cotton tree; and gugal or incense made of resin, sandalwood and other
ingredients is burnt before him. He is the deified ape, and is the god of
strength and swiftness, owing to the exploits performed by him during
Rāma’s invasion of Ceylon. Dūlha Deo is another godling whose shrine is in
every village. He was a young bridegroom who was carried off by a tiger on
his way to his wedding, or, according to another account, was turned into a
stone pillar by a flash of lightning. Before the starting of a wedding
procession the members go to Dūlha Deo and offer a pair of shoes and a
miniature post and marriage-crown. On their return they offer a cocoanut.
Dūlha Deo has a stone and platform to the east of the village, or occasionally
an image of a man on horseback like Hardaul. Mirohia is the god of the field
boundary. There is no sign of him, but every tenant, when he begins sowing
and cutting the crops, offers a little curds and rice and a cocoanut and lays
them on the boundary of the field, saying the name of Mirohia Deo. It is
believed among agriculturists that if this godling is neglected he will flatten
the corn by a wind, or cause the cart to break on its way to the threshing-
floor.

31. Sowing the Jawaras or Gardens of Adonis

The sowing of the Jawaras, corresponding to the gardens of Adonis, takes
place during the first nine days of the months of Kunwār and Chait
(September and March). The former is a nine days’ fast preceding the
Dasahra festival, and it is supposed that the goddess Devi was during this

Page 111

time employed In fighting the buffalo-demon (Bhainsāsur), whom she slew
on the tenth day. The latter is a nine days’ fast at the new year, preceding the
triumphant entry of Rāma into Ajodhia on the tenth day on his return from
Ceylon. The first period comes before the sowing of the spring crop of wheat
and other grains, and the second is at the commencement of the harvest of
the same crop. In some localities the Jawaras are also grown a third time in
the rains, probably as a preparation for the juāri sowings,19 as juāri is planted
in the baskets or ‘gardens’ at this time. On the first day a small room is
cleared and whitewashed, and is known as the diwāla or temple. Some earth
is brought from the fields and mixed with manure in a basket, and a male
member of the family sows wheat in it, bathing before he does so. The
basket is kept in the diwāla and the same man attends on it throughout the
nine days, fasting all day and eating only milk and fruit at night. A similar
nine days’ fast was observed by the Eleusinians before the sacramental
eating of corn and the worship of the Corn Goddess, which constituted the
Eleusinian mysteries.20 During the period of nine days, called the Naorātra,
the plants are watered, and long stalks spring up. On the eighth day the hom
or fire offering is performed, and the Gunias or devotees are possessed by
Devi. On the evening of the ninth day the women, putting on their best
clothes, walk out of the houses with the pots of grain on their heads, singing
songs in praise of Devi. The men accompany them beating drums and
cymbals. The devotees pierce their cheeks with long iron needles and walk
in the procession. High-caste women, who cannot go themselves, hire the
barber’s or waterman’s wife to go for them. The pots are taken to a tank and
thrown in, the stalks of grain being kept and distributed as a mark of amity.
The wheat which is sown in Kunwār gives a forecast of the spring crops. A
plant is pulled out, and the return of the crop will be the same number of
times the seed as it has roots. The woman who gets to the tank first counts
the number of plants in her pot, and this gives the price of wheat in rupees
per māni.21 Sometimes marks of red rust appear on the plants, and this
shows that the crop will suffer from rust. The ceremony performed in Chait
is said to be a sort of harvest thanksgiving. On the ninth day of the autumn
ceremony another celebration called ‘Jhinjhia’ or ‘Norta’ takes place in large
villages. A number of young unmarried girls take earthen pots and, making
holes in them and placing lamps inside, carry them on their heads through
the village, singing and dancing. They receive presents from the villagers,

Page 112

with which they hold a feast. At this a small platform is erected and two
earthen dolls, male and female, are placed on it; rice and flowers are offered
to them and their marriage is celebrated.

Sowing

The following observances in connection with the crops are practised by the
agricultural castes in Chhattīsgarh:

32. Rites connected with the crops. Customs of
cultivation

The agricultural year begins on Akti or the 3rd day of Baisākh (April-May).
On that day a cup made of palās22 leaves and filled with rice is offered to
Thākur Deo. In some villages the boys sow rice seeds before Thākur Deo’s
shrine with little toy ploughs. The cultivator then goes to his field, and
covering his hand with wheat-flour and turmeric, stamps it five times on the
plough. The mālguzār takes five handfuls of the seed consecrated to Thākur

Page 113

Deo and sows it, and each of the cultivators also sows a little. After this
regular cultivation may begin on any day, though Monday and Friday are
considered auspicious days for the commencement of sowing. On the Hareli,
or festival of the fresh verdure, which falls on the 15th day of Shrāwan
(July-August), balls of flour mixed with salt are given to the cattle. The
plough and all the implements of agriculture are taken to a tank and washed,
and are then set up in the courtyard of the house and plastered with
cowdung. The plough is set facing towards the sun, and butter and sugar are
offered to it. An earthen pot is whitewashed and human figures are drawn on
it with charcoal, one upside down. It is then hung over the entrance to the
house and is believed to avert the evil eye. All the holes in the cattle-sheds
and courtyards are filled and levelled with gravel. While the rice is growing,
holidays are observed on five Sundays and no work is done. Before harvest
Thākur Deo must be propitiated with an offering of a white goat or a black
fowl. Any one who begins to cut his crop before this offering has been made
to Thākur Deo is fined the price of a goat by the village community. Before
threshing his corn each cultivator offers a separate sacrifice to Thākur Deo
of a goat, a fowl or a broken cocoanut. Each evening, on the conclusion of a
day’s threshing, a wisp of straw is rubbed on the forehead of each bullock,
and a hair is then pulled from its tail, and the hairs and straw made into a
bundle are tied to the pole of the threshing-floor. The cultivator prays, ‘O
God of plenty! enter here full and go out empty.’ Before leaving the
threshing-floor for the night some straw is burnt and three circles are drawn
with the ashes, one round the heap of grain and the others round the pole.
Outside the circles are drawn pictures of the sun, the moon, a lion and a
monkey, or of a cart and a pair of bullocks. Next morning before sunrise the
ashes are swept away by waving a winnowing-fan over them. This ceremony
is called anjan chadhāna or placing lamp-black on the face of the threshing-
floor to avert the evil eye, as women put it on their eyes. Before the grain is
measured it must be stacked in the form of a trapezium with the shorter end
to the south, and not in that of a square or oblong heap. The measurer stands
facing the east, and having the shorter end of the heap on his left hand. On
the larger side of the heap are laid the kalara or hook, a winnowing-fan, the
dauri, a rope by which the bullocks are tied to the threshing-pole, one or
three branches of the ber or wild plum tree, and the twisted bundle of straw
and hair of the bullocks which had been tied to the pole. On the top of the

Page 114

heap are placed five balls of cowdung, and the hom or fire sacrifice is
offered to it. The first kātha23 of rice measured is also laid by the heap. The
measurer never quite empties his measure while the work is going on, as it is
feared that if he does this the god of abundance will leave the threshing-
floor. While measuring he should always wear a turban. It is considered
unlucky for any one who has ridden on an elephant to enter the threshing-
floor, but a person who has ridden on a tiger brings luck. Consequently the
Gonds and Baigas, if they capture a young tiger and tame it, will take it
round the country, and the cultivators pay them a little to give their children
a ride on it. To enter a threshing-floor with shod feet is also unlucky. Grain is
not usually measured at noon but in the morning or evening.

Threshing

33. Agricultural superstitions

Page 115

The cultivators think that each grain should bear a hundredfold, but they do
not get this as Kuvera, the treasurer of the gods, or Bhainsāsur, the buffalo
demon who lives in the fields, takes it. Bhainsāsur is worshipped when the
rice is coming into ear, and if they think he is likely to be mischievous they
give him a pig, but otherwise a smaller offering. When the standing corn in
the fields is beaten down at night they think that Bhainsāsur has been
passing over it. He also steals the crop while it is being cut and is lying on
the ground. Once Bhainsāsur was absent while the particular field in the
village from which he stole his supply of grain was cut and the crop
removed, and afterwards he was heard crying that all his provision for the
year had been lost. Sometimes the oldest man in the house cuts the first five
bundles of the crop, and they are afterwards left in the field for the birds to
eat. And at the end of harvest the last one or two sheaves are left standing in
the field, and any one who likes can cut and carry them away. In some
localities the last stalks are left standing in the field and are known as
barhona or the giver of increase. Then all the labourers rush together at this
last patch of corn and tear it up by the roots; everybody seizes as much as he
can and keeps it, the master having no share in this patch. After the barhona
has been torn up all the labourers fall on their faces to the ground and
worship the field. In other places the barhona is left standing for the birds to
eat. This custom, arises from the belief demonstrated by Sir J. G. Frazer in
The Golden Bough that the corn-spirit takes refuge in the last patch of grain,
and that when it is cut he flies away or his life is extinguished. And the idea
is supported by the fact that the rats and other vermin, who have been living
in the field, seek shelter in the last patch of corn, and when this is cut have to
dart out in front of the reapers. In some countries it is thought, as shown by
Sir J. G. Frazer, that the corn-spirit takes refuge in the body of one of these
animals.

34. Houses

The house of a mālguzār or good tenant stands in a courtyard or angan 45 to
60 feet square and surrounded by a brick or mud wall. The plan of a typical

Page 116

house is shown below:—

The dālān or hall is for the reception of visitors. One of the living-rooms is
set apart for storing grain. Those who keep their women secluded have a
door at the back of the courtyard for their use. Cooking is done in one of the
rooms, and there are no chimneys, the smoke escaping through the tiles.
They bathe either in the chauk or central courtyard, or go out and bathe in a
tank or river or at a well. The family usually sleep inside the house in the
winter and outside in the hot weather. A poor mālguzār or tenant has only
two rooms with a veranda in front, one of which is used by the family, while
cattle are kept in the other; while the small tenants and labourers have only
one room in which both men and cattle reside. The walls are of bamboo
matting plastered on both sides with mud, and the roof usually consists of
single small tiles roughly baked in an improvised kiln. The house is
surrounded by a mud wall or hedge, and sometimes has a garden behind in
which tobacco, maize or vegetables are grown. The interior is dark, for light
is admitted only by the low door, and the smoke-stained ceiling contributes

Page 117

to the gloom. The floor is of beaten earth well plastered with cowdung, the
plastering being repeated weekly.

Winnowing

35. Superstitions about houses

The following are some superstitious beliefs and customs about houses. A
house should face north or east and not south or west, as the south is the
region of Yama, the god of death, who lives in Ceylon, and the west the
quarter of the setting sun. A Muhammadan’s house, on the other hand,
should face south or west because Mecca lies to the south-west. A house may
have verandas front and back, or on the front and two sides, but not on all
four sides. The front of a house should be lower than the back, this shape
being known as gai-mukh or cow-mouthed, and not higher than the back,
which is singh-mukh or tiger-mouthed. The front and back doors should not

Page 118

be in a straight line, which would enable one to look right through the house.
The angan or compound of a house should be a little longer than it is wide,
no matter how little. Conversely the building itself should be a little wider
along the front than it is long from front to rear. The kitchen should always
be on the right side if there is a veranda, or else behind. When an astrologer
is about to found a house he calculates the direction in which Shesh Nāg, the
snake on whom the world reposes, is holding his head at that time, and
plants the first brick or stone to the left of that direction, because snakes and
elephants do not turn to the left but always to the right. Consequently the
house will be more secure and less likely to be shaken down by Shesh Nāg’s
movements, which cause the phenomenon known to us as an earthquake.
Below the foundation-stone or brick are buried a pice, an areca-nut and a
grain of rice, and it is lucky if the stone be laid by a man who has been
faithful to his wife. There should be no echo in a house, as an echo is
considered to be the voice of evil spirits. The main beam should be placed in
position on a lucky day, and the carpenter breaks a cocoanut against it and
receives a present. The width of the rooms along the front of a house should
be five cubits each, and if there is a staircase it must have an uneven number
of steps. The door should be low so that a man must bend his head on
entering and thus show respect to the household god. The floor of the
verandas should be lower than that of the room inside; the Hindus say that
the compound should not see the veranda nor the veranda the house. But this
rule has of course also the advantage of keeping the house-floor dry. If the
main beam of a house breaks it is a very bad omen, as also for a vulture or
kite to perch on the roof; if this should happen seven days running the house
will inevitably be left empty by sickness or other misfortune. A dog howling
in front of the house is very unlucky, and if, as may occasionally happen, a
dog should get on to the roof of the house and bark, the omen is of the worst
kind. Neither the pīpal nor banyan trees should be planted in the yard of a
house, because the leavings of food might fall upon them, and this would be
an insult to the deities who inhabit the sacred trees. Neither is it well to plant
the nīm tree, because the nīm is the tree of anchorites, and the frequent
contemplation of it will take away from a man the desire of offspring and
lead to the extinction of his family. Bananas should not be grown close to the
house, because the sound of this fruit bursting the pod is said to be audible,
and to hear it is most unlucky. It is a good thing to have a gular24 tree in the

Page 119

yard, but at a little distance from the house so that the leavings of food may
not fall upon it; this is the tree of the saint Dattatreya, and will cause wealth
to increase in the house. A plant of the sacred tulsi or basil is usually kept in
the yard, and every morning the householder pours a vessel of water over it
as he bathes, and in the evening places a lamp beside it. This holy plant
sanctifies the air which passes over it to the house.

No one should ever sit on the threshold of a house; this is the seat of
Lakshmi, the goddess of wealth, and to sit on it is disrespectful to her. A
house should never be swept at twilight, because it is then that Lakshmi
makes her rounds, and she would curse it and pass by. At this time a lamp
should be lighted, no one should be allowed to sleep, and even if a man is
sick he should sit up on his bed. At this time the grinding-mill should not be
turned nor grain be husked, but reverence should be paid to ancestors and to
the household deities. No one must sit on the grinding-mill; it is regarded as
a mother because it gives out the flour by which the family is fed. No one
must sit on cowdung cakes because they are the seat of Saturn, the Evil One,
and their smell is called Sanīchar ke bās. No one must step on the chūlka or
cooking-hearth nor jar it with his foot. At the midday meal, when food is
freshly cooked, each man will take a little fire from the hearth and place it in
front of him, and will throw a little of everything he eats on to the fire, and
some ghī as an offering to Agni, the god of fire. And he will also walk round
the hearth, taking water in his hand and then throwing it on the ground as an
offering to Agni. A man should not sleep with his feet to the south, because a
corpse is always laid in that direction. He should not sleep with his feet to
the east, nor spit out water from his mouth in the direction of the east.

Page 120

Women grinding wheat and husking rice

36. Furniture

Of furniture there is very little. Carefully arranged in their places are the
brass cooking-pots, water-pots and plates, well polished with mud and water
applied with plenty of elbow-grease by the careful housewife. Poor tenants
frequently only have one or two brass plates and cups and an iron girdle,
while all the rest of their vessels are of earthenware. Each house has several
chūlhas or small horseshoe erections of earth for cooking. Each person in the
house has a sleeping-cot if the family is comfortably off, and a spare one is
also kept. These must be put out and exposed to the sun at least once a week
to clear them of fleas and bugs. It is said that the Jains cannot adopt this
method of disinfecting their beds owing to the sacrifice of insect life thereby

Page 121

involved; and that there are persons in Calcutta who make it their profession
to go round and offer to lie on these cots for a time; they lie on them for
some hours, and the little denizens being surfeited with their blood
subsequently allow the owner of the cot to have a quiet night. A cot should
always be shorter than a man’s length, so that his legs project over the end; if
it is so long as to contain his whole length it is like a bier, and it is feared
that lying on a cot of this kind will cause him shortly to lie on a bier. Poor
tenants do not usually have cots, but sleep on the ground, spreading kodon-
straw on it for warmth. They have no bedding except a gudri or mattress
made of old rags and clothes sewn together. In winter they put it over them,
and sleep on it in summer. They will have a wooden log to rest their heads
on when sleeping, and this will also serve as a seat for a guest. Mālguzārs
have a razai or quilt, and a doria or thick cloth like those used for covering
carts. Clothes and other things are kept in jhāmpis or round bamboo baskets.
For sitting on there are machnīs or four-legged stools about a foot high with
seats of grass rope or pīrhis, little wooden stools only an inch or two from
the ground. For lighting, wicks are set afloat in little earthen saucers filled
with oil.

37. Clothes

Landowners usually have a long coat known as angarkha reaching to the
knees, with flaps folding over the breasts and tied with strings. The bandi is
a short coat like this but coming only to the hips, and is more popular with
cultivators. In the cold weather it is frequently stuffed with cotton and dyed
dark green or dark blue so as not to show the dirt. For visits of ceremony a
pair of paijāmas are kept, but otherwise the dhoti or loin-cloth is commonly
worn. Wearing the dhoti pulled half-way up to the thighs is called
‘cultivator’s fashion.’ A shirt may be worn under the coat; but cultivators
usually have only one garment, nowadays often a sleeveless coat with
buttons in front. The proper head-dress is the pagri, a piece of coloured cloth
perhaps 30 feet long and a foot wide, twisted tightly into folds, which is
lifted on and off the head and is only rarely undone. Twisting the pagri is an

Page 122

art, and a man is usually hired to do it and paid four annas. The pagris have
different shapes in different parts of the country, and a Hindu can tell by the
shape of a man’s pagri where he comes from. But nowadays cultivators
usually wear a dupatta or short piece of cloth tied, loosely round the head.
The tenant arranges his head-cloth with a large projection on one side, and in
it he carries his chilam or pipe-bowl, and also small quantities of vegetables,
salt or condiments purchased at the bazār. In case of necessity he can
transform it into a loin-cloth, or tie up a bundle of grass with it, or tie his lota
to it to draw water from a well. ‘What can the washerman do in a village
where the people live naked?’ is a Chhattīsgarhi proverb which aptly
indicates that scantiness is the most prominent feature of the local apparel.
Here a cloth round the loins, and this usually of meagre dimensions,
constituted, until recently, the full dress of a cultivator. Those who have
progressed a stage farther throw a cloth loosely over one shoulder, covering
the chest, and assume an apology for a turban by wrapping another small rag
carelessly round the head, leaving the crown generally bare, as if this part of
the person required special sunning and ventilation. Hindus will not be seen
out-of-doors with the head bare, though the Gonds and other tribes only
begin to wear head-cloths when they are adopting Hinduism. The Gondi
fashion was formerly prevalent in Chhattīsgarh. Some sanctity attaches to
the turban, probably because it is the covering of the head. To knock off a
man’s turban is a great insult, and if it drops off or he lets it fall, it is a very
bad omen.

Page 123

Group of women in Hindustāni dress

38. Women’s clothes

Women, in the northern Districts wear a skirt made of coarse cloth, usually
red or blue, and a shoulder-cloth of the same material. Hand-woven cloth is
still commonly used in the interior. The skirt is sometimes drawn up through
the legs behind so as to give it a divided appearance; this is called kachhota.
On the upper part of the body they wear an angia or breast-cloth, that is a
short, tight, sleeveless jacket reaching only to below the breasts. The angia
is tied behind, while the Marātha choli, which is the same thing, is buttoned
or tied in front. High-caste women draw their shoulder-cloth right over the
head so that the face cannot be seen. When a woman goes before a person of
position she covers her head, as it is considered immodest to leave it bare.
Women of respectable families wear a sheet of fine white, yellow, or red
cloth drawn over the head and reaching to the ankles when they go on a
journey, this being known as pichhora. In Chhattīsgarh all the requirements
of fashion among women are satisfied by one cloth from 8 to 12 yards long

Page 124

and about a yard wide, which envelops the person in one fold from the waist
to below the knee, hanging somewhat loosely. It is tied at the waist, and the
remaining half is spread over the breast and drawn across the right shoulder,
the end covering the head like a sheet and falling over the left shoulder. The
simplicity of this solitary garment displays a graceful figure to advantage,
especially on festival days, when those who can afford it are arrayed in tasar
silk. When a girl is married the bridegroom’s family give her expensive
clothes to wear at festivals and her own people give her ordinary clothes, but
usually not more than will last a year. Whenever she goes back to her
father’s house after her marriage, he gives her one or two cloths if he can
afford it. Women of the middle and lower classes wear ornaments of bell-
metal, a mixture of copper and zinc, which are very popular. Some women
wear brass and zinc ornaments, and well-to-do persons have them of silver
or gold.

39. Bathing

Hot water is not used for bathing in Saugor, except by invalids, but is
customary in Betūl and other Districts. The bathing-place in the courtyard is
usually a large square stone on which the bather sits; he has a big circular
brass vessel by him called gangāl,25 and from this he takes water either in a
cup or with his hands and throws it over himself, rubbing his body. Where
there is a tank or stream people go to bathe in it, and if there is none the
poorer classes sometimes bathe at the village well. Each man or woman has
two body-or loin-cloths, and they change the cloth whenever they bathe—
going into the water in the one which they have worn from the previous day,
and changing into the other when they come out; long practice enables them
to do this in public without any undue exposure of the body. A good tank or
a river is a great amenity to a village, especially if it has a ghāt or flight of
stone steps. Many people will spend an hour or so here daily, disporting
themselves in the water or on the bank, and wedding and funeral parties are
held by it, owing to the facilities for ceremonial bathing.

Page 125

40. Food

People who do not cultivate with their own hands have only two daily meals,
one at midday and the other at eight or nine in the evening. Agriculturists
require a third meal in the early morning before going out to the fields.
Wheat and the millets juāri and kodon are the staple foods of the cultivating
classes in the northern Districts, and rice is kept for festivals. The millets are
made into thick chapātis or cakes, their flour not being sufficiently adhesive
for thin ones, and are eaten with the pulses, lentils, arhar,26 mung27 and
urad.28 The pulses are split into half and boiled in water, and when they get
soft, chillies, salt and turmeric are mixed with them. Pieces of chapāti are
broken off and dipped into this mixture. Various vegetables are also eaten.
When pulse is not available the chapātis are simply dipped into buttermilk.
If chapātis cannot be afforded at both meals, ghorna or the flour of kodon or
juār boiled into a paste with water is substituted for them, a smaller quantity
of this being sufficient to allay hunger. Wheat-cakes are fried in ghī
(clarified butter) as a luxury, and at other times in sesamum oil. Rice or
ground gram boiled in buttermilk are other favourite foods.

In Chhattīsgarh rice is the common food: it is eaten with pulses at midday
and with vegetables cooked in ghī in the evening. In the morning they drink
a rice-gruel, called bāsi> which consists of the previous night’s repast mixed
with water and taken cold. On festivals rice is boiled in milk. Milk is often
drunk at night, and there is a saying, “He who drinks water in the morning
and milk at night and takes harra before he sleeps will never need a doctor.”
A little powdered harra or myrobalan acts as an aperient. The food of
landowners and tenants is much the same, except that the former have more
butter and vegetables, according to the saying, ‘Rāja praja ka ekhi khāna’ or
‘The king and peasant eat the same food.’ Those who eat flesh have an
occasional change of food, but most Kurmis abstain from it. Farmservants
eat the gruel of rice or kodon boiled in water when they can afford it, and if
not they eat mahua flowers. These are sometimes boiled in water, and the

Page 126

juice is then strained off and mixed with half-ground flour, and they are also
pounded and made into chapātis with flour and water. The leaves of the
young gram-plants make a very favourite vegetable and are eaten raw, either
moist or dried. In times of scarcity the poorer classes eat tamarind leaves, the
pith of the banyan tree, the seeds of the bamboo, the bark of the semar
tree,29 the fruit of the babūl,30 and other articles. A cultivator will eat 2 lbs.
of grain a day if he can get it, or more in the case of rice. Their stomachs get
distended owing to the large quantities of boiled rice eaten at one time. The
leaves of the chirota or chakora a little plant31 which grows thickly at the
commencement of the rains near inhabited sites, are also a favourite
vegetable, and a resource in famine time. The people call it ‘Gaon ka
thākur,’ or ‘lord of the village,’ and have a saying:

Amarbel aur kamalgata,
Gaon ka thākur, gai ka matha,
Nagar sowāsan, unmen milai,
Khāj, dād, sehua mīt jāwe.

Amarbel is an endless creeper, with long yellow strings like stalks, which
infests and destroys trees; it is called amarbel or the immortal, because it has
no visible root. Kamalgata is the seed of the lotus; gai ka matha is
buttermilk; nagar sowāsan, ‘the happiness of the town,’ is turmeric, because
married women whose husbands are alive put turmeric on their foreheads
every day; khāj, dād and sehua are itch, ringworm and some kind of rash,
perhaps measles; and the verse therefore means:

“Eat amarbel, lotus seeds, chirota, buttermilk and turmeric mixed together,
and you will keep off itch, ringworm and measles.” Chirota is good for the
itch.

41. Caste-feasts

Page 127

At the commencement of a marriage or other ceremonial feast the host must
wash the feet of all the guests himself. If he does not do this they will be
dissatisfied, and, though they will eat at his house, will consider they have
not been properly welcomed. He takes a large brass plate and placing the
feet of his guest on it, pours water over them and then rubs and dries them;
the water is thrown away and fresh water poured out for the next guest
unless they should be brothers. Little flat stools about three inches high are
provided for the guests, and if there are not enough of them a carpet is
spread; or baithkis or sitting-mats plaited from five or six large leaves are set
out. These serve as a mark of attention, as it would be discourteous to make
a man sit on the ground, and they also prevent the body-cloth from getting
wet. The guests sit in the chauk or yard of the house inside, or in the angan
or outside yard, either in lines or in a circle; members of the same caste sit
with their crossed knees actually touching those of the man on either side of
them to emphasise their brotherhood; if a man sat even a few inches apart
from his fellows people would say he was out of caste—and this is how a
man who is put out of caste actually does sit. Before each guest may be set
two plates of leaves and eight donas or leaf-cups. On the plates are heaped
rice, cakes of wheat fried in butter, and of husked urad pulse cooked with
tilli or sesamum oil, and the pulse of gram and lentils. In the cups will be
sugar, ghī, dahi or curded milk, various vegetables, pumpkins, and besin or
ground gram cooked with buttermilk. All the male members of the host’s
family serve the food and they take it round, heaping and pouring it into
each man’s plates or cups until he says enough; and they continue to give
further helpings as required. All the food is served at once in the different
plates and cups, but owing to the number of guests a considerable time
elapses before all are fully served, and the dinner lasts about two hours. The
guests eat all the different dishes together with their fingers, taking a little of
each according to their fancy. Each man has his lota or vessel of water by
him and drinks as he eats. When the meal is finished large brass plates are
brought in, one being given to about ten guests, and they wash their hands
over these, pouring water on them from their vessels. A fresh carpet is then
spread in the yard and the guests sit on it, and betel-leaf and tobacco are
distributed. The huqqa is passed round, and chilams and chongis (clay pipe-
bowls and leaf-pipes) are provided for those who want them. The women do

Page 128

not appear at the feast but stay inside, sitting in the angan or inner court,
which is behind the purda.

42. Hospitality

The people still show great hospitality, and it is the custom of many
mālguzārs, at least in Chhattīsgarh, to afford food and a night’s rest to all
travellers who may require it. When a Brāhman comes to the village such
mālguzārs will give him one or two annas, and to a Pandit or learned man as
much as a rupee. Formerly it is said that when any stranger came through the
village he was at once offered a cup of milk and told to drink it or throw it
away. But this custom has died out in Chhattīsgarh, though one has met with
it once or twice in Sambalpur. When District Officers go on tour, well-to-do
landowners ask to be allowed to supply free provisions for the whole camp
at least for a day, and it is difficult to refuse them gracefully. In Mandla,
Banias and mālguzārs in villages near the Nerbudda sometimes undertake to
give a pound of grain to every parikramawāsi or pilgrim perambulating the
Nerbudda. And as the number of these steadily increases in consequence,
they often become impoverished as a result of such indiscriminate charity.

43. Social customs. Tattooing

The Kurmis employ Brāhmans for their ceremonies. They have gurus or
spiritual preceptors who may be Brāhmans or Bairāgis; the guru is given
from 8 annas to Rs. 5 when he initiates a neophyte, as well as his food and a
new white cloth. The guru is occasionally consulted on some religious
question, but otherwise he does nothing for his disciple except to pay him an
occasional visit, when he is hospitably entertained. The Kurmis of the
northern Districts do not as a rule eat meat and also abstain from alcohol, but

Page 129

in Chhattīsgarh they eat the flesh of clean animals and fish, and also of
fowls, and drink country liquor. Old men often give up flesh and wine as a
mark of piety, when they are known as Bhagat or holy. They will take food
cooked with water only from Brāhmans, and that cooked without water from
Rājpūts, Banias and Kāyasths as well. Brāhmans and Rājpūts will take water
from Kurmis in the northern Districts though not in Chhattīsgarh. Here the
Kurmis do not object to eating cooked food which has been carried from the
house to the fields. This is called rengai roti, and castes which will eat it are
considered inferior to those who always take their food in the chauka or
purified place in the house. They say ‘Rām, Rām’ to each other in greeting,
and the Raipur Kurmis swear by a dog or a pig. Generally they do not
plough on the new or full moon days. Their women are tattooed after
marriage with dots on the cheeks, marks of flies on the fingers, scorpions on
the arms, and other devices on the legs.

44. Caste penalties

Permanent expulsion from caste is inflicted for a change of religion, taking
food or having sexual intercourse with a member of an impure caste, and for
eating beef. For killing a man, a cow, a buffalo, an ass, a horse, a squirrel, a
cat or a monkey a man must purify himself by bathing in the Ganges at
Allahābād or Benāres and giving a feast to the caste. It will be seen that all
these are domestic animals except the monkey, who is the god Hanumān.
The squirrel is counted as a domestic animal because it is always about the
house, and the souls of children are believed to go into squirrels. One
household animal, the dog, is omitted, and he appears to be less sacred than
the others. For getting maggots in a wound the offender must bathe in a
sacred river, such as the Nerbudda or Mahānadi, and give a feast to the caste.
For eating or having intercourse with a member of any caste other than the
impure ones, or for a liaison within the caste, or for divorcing a wife or
marrying a widow, or in the case of a woman for breaking her bangles in a
quarrel with her husband, a penalty feast must be given. If a man omits to

Page 130

feast the caste after a death in his family a second feast is imposed, and if he
insults the panchāyat he is fined.

45. The cultivating status

The social status of the Kurmi appears to be that of the cultivator. He is
above the menial and artisan castes of the village and the impure weaving
and labouring castes; he is theoretically equal to the artisan castes of towns,
but one or two of these, such as the Sunār or goldsmith and Kasār or brass-
worker, have risen in the world owing to the prosperity or importance of
their members, and now rank above the Kurmi. The Kurmi’s status appears
to be that of the cultivator and member of the village community, but a large
proportion of the Kurmis are recruited from the non-Aryan tribes, who have
obtained land and been admitted into the caste, and this tends to lower the
status of the caste as a whole. In the Punjab Kurmis apparently do not hold
land and are employed in grass-cutting, weaving, and tending horses, and are
even said to keep pigs.32 Here their status is necessarily very low as they
follow the occupations of the impure castes. The reason why the Kurmi as
cultivator ranks above the village handicraftsmen may perhaps be that
industrial pursuits were despised in early times and left to the impure Sūdras
and to the castes of mixed descent; while agriculture and trade were the
occupations of the Vaishya. Further, the village artisans and menials were
supported before the general use of current coin by contributions of grain
from the cultivators and by presents of grain at seed-time and harvest; and
among the Hindus it is considered very derogatory to accept a gift, a man
who does so being held to admit his social inferiority to the giver. Some
exception to this is made in the case of Brāhmans, though even with them
the rule partly applies. Of these two reasons for the cultivator’s superiority to
the menial and artisan castes the former has to a large extent lost its force.
The handicrafts are no longer considered despicable, and, as has been seen,
some of the urban tradesmen, as the Sunār and Kasār, now rank above the
Kurmi, or are at least equal to him. Perhaps even in ancient times these
urban artificers were not despised like the village menials, as their skill was

Page 131

held in high repute. But the latter ground is still in full force and effect in the
Central Provinces at least: the village artisans are still paid by contributions
from the cultivator and receive presents from him at seed-time and harvest.
The remuneration of the village menials, the blacksmith, carpenter,
washerman, tanner, barber and waterman is paid at the rate of so much grain
per plough of land according to the estimated value of the work done by
them for the cultivators during the year. Other village tradesmen, as the
potter, oilman and liquor-vendor, are no longer paid in grain, but since the
introduction of currency sell their wares for cash; but there seems no reason
to doubt that in former times when no money circulated in villages they were
remunerated in the same manner. They still all receive presents, consisting of
a sowing-basketful of grain at seed-time and one or two sheaves at harvest.
The former are known as Bījphuti, or ‘the breaking of the seed,’ and the
latter as Khanvār, or ‘that which is left.’ In Bilāspur the Kamias or village
menials also receive as much grain as will fill a winnowing-fan when it has
been threshed. When the peasant has harvested his grain all come and beg
from him. The Dhīmar brings waternut, the Kāchhi or market-gardener some
chillies, the Teli oil and tobacco, the Kalār some liquor if he drinks it, the
Bania some sugar, and all receive grain in excess of the value of their gifts.
The village menials come for their customary dues, and the Brāhman, the
Nat or acrobat, the Gosain or religious mendicant, and the Fakīr or
Muhammadan beggar solicit alms. On that day the cultivator is like a little
king in his fields, and it is said that sometimes a quarter of the crop may go
in this way; but the reference must be only to the spring crop and not to the
whole holding. In former times grain must have been the principal source of
wealth, and this old custom gives us a reason for the status of the cultivator
in Hindu society. There is also a saying:

Uttam kheti, madhyam bān,
Kanisht chākri, bhīk nidān,

or ‘Cultivation is the best calling, trade is respectable, service is menial, and
begging is degraded.’

Page 132

46. Occupation

The Kurmi is the typical cultivator. He loves his land, and to lose it is to
break the mainspring of his life. His land gives him a freedom and
independence of character which is not found among the English farm-
labourers. He is industrious and plodding, and inured to hardship. In some
Districts the excellent tilth of the Kurmi’s fields well portrays the result of
his persevering labour, which he does not grudge to the land because it is his
own. His wife is in no way behind him; the proverb says, “Good is the caste
of the Kurmin; with a hoe in her hand she goes to the fields and works with
her husband.” The Chandnāhu Kurmi women are said to be more
enterprising than the men, keeping them up to their work, and managing the
business of the farm as well as the household.

Appendix

List of Exogamous Clans

Sections of the Chandnāhu subcaste:

Chānwar bambar Fly fan.
Sandil Name of a Rishi.
Gaind Ball.
Sadāphal A fruit.
Sondeha Gold-bodied.
Sonkharchi Spender of gold.
Kathail Kath, wood, or kaththa, catechu.

Page 133

Kāshi Benares. The Desha Kurmis are all of this gotra. It may also be a corruption of
Kachhap, tortoise.
Dhorha Dhor, cattle.
Sumer A mountain.
Chatur Midalia Chatur, clever.
Bhāradwāj After the Rishi of that name; also a bird.
Kousil Name of a Rishi.
Ishwar God.
Samund Karkari A particle in an ocean.
Akālchuwa Akāl, famine.
Padel Fallow.
Bāghmār Tiger-slayer.
Hardūba Green grass.
Kānsia Kāns, a kind of grass.
Ghiu Sāgar Ocean of ghī
Dharam Most charitable.
Dhurandar
Singnāha Singh, a lion.
Chimangarhia Belonging to Chimangarh.
Khairagarhia Belonging to Khairagarh.
Gotam A Rishi.
Kāskyap A Rishi.
Pandariha From Pandaria, a village.
Paipakhār One who washes feet.
Bānhpakhār One who washes arms.
Chauria Chaurai, a vegetable.
Sānd Sathi Sānd, bullock.
Singhi Singh, lion or horn.
Agra—Chandan Sandalwood.
Tek Sanichar Saturday.
Karaiya Frying-pan.

Page 134

Pukharia Pond.
Dhubinha Dhobi, a caste.
Pāwanbare Pāwan, air.
Modganga Ganges.

Sections of the Gabel subcaste:

Gangajal Ganges water.
Bimba Lohir Bearer of a lāthi (stick).
Sarang Peacock.
Rāja Rāwat Royal prince.
Singūr Beauty.
Bānk pagar With a thread on the arm.
Samundha Ocean.
Parasrām, Rishi
Katārmal Katār, dagger.
Chaultān Sept of Rājpūts.
Pātan Village.
Gajmani Elephant.
Deori Sumer Village.
Lahura Samudra Small sea.
Hansbimbraon Hans, goose.
Sunwāni Purifier.

Sections of the Santora subcaste:

Narvaria Narwar, a town in Gwalior State.
Mundharia Mundhra, a village.
Naigaiyan Naogaon, a town in Bundelkhand.
Pipraiya Piparia, a village.
Dindoria Dindori, a village in Mandla District.
Baheria A village.

Page 135

Bāndha Bāndh, embankment.
Ktmūsar Wooden pestle.

Sections of the Tirole subcaste:

Baghele Bāgh, tiger, or a sept of Rājpūts.
Rāthor Clan of Rājpūts.
Panwār Clan of Rājpūts.
Solanki Clan of Rājpūts.
Aulia Aonla, a fruit-bearing tree.
Sindia Sindi, date-palm tree.
Khusia Khusi, happiness.
Sanoria San, hemp.
Gora Fair-coloured.
Bhākrya Bhākar, a thick bread.

Sections of the Gaur subcaste:

Bhandāri Storekeeper.
Dudhua Dūdh, milk.
Patele A headman.
Lonia Salt-maker.
Kumaria A potter.
Sionia Seoni town.
Chhaparia Chhapāra, a town.
Bijoria A tree.
Simra A village.
Ketharia Keth, a fruit.
Usarguiyan Perhaps a village.
Bhadoria Village.
Rurgaiyan Village.
Musrele Mūsar, a pestle.

Page 136

Sections of the Usrete subcaste:

Shikāre Hunter.
Nāhar Tiger.
Gursaraiyan Gursarai, a town.
Bardia A village.
Sandia Sānd, a bull.
Sirwaiyan Sirwai, a village.
Itguhān A village.
Sengaiyan or Sengai, a village.
Singaiyan
Harkotia Harkoti, a village.
Noria Norai, a village.
Larent Lareti, a village.
Rabia Rabai, a village.
Lakhauria (Lakori village. It is said that whoever utters the name of this section early in the
morning is sure to remain hungry the whole day, or at least will get into some
trouble that day.)
Dhandkonya Dhandakna, to roll.
Badgaiyan Badagaon, a large village.
Kotia Kot, a fort
Bilwār Billi, cat
Thutha Stump of a tree.

Sections of the Kanaujia subcaste:

Tidha.—From Tidha, a village. This section is subdivided into (a)
Ghureparke (of the cow-dung hill); (b) Dwārparke (of the door); and
(c) Jangi (warrior).
Chamania—From Chamyani (village). This is also subdivided into:
(a) Gomarkya
(b) Mathuria (Muttra town).
Chaudhri (caste headman). This is divided as follows:

Page 137

(a) Majhgawān A village.
(b) Purva thok Eastern group.
(c) Pashchim thok Western group.
(d) Bamurya A village.
Rāwat Title.
Malha Perhaps sailor or wrestler.
Chiloliān Chiloli, a village.
Dhanuiyan Dhanu Kheda, a village.

1 In this article some account of the houses, clothes and food of the Hindus generally of the
northern Districts has been inserted, being mainly reproduced from the District Gazetteers.

2 Tribes and Castes of Bengal, art. Kurmi.
3 Indian Folk Tales, p. 8.

4 Crotalaria juncea. See article on Lorha for a discussion of the Hindus’ prejudice against this
crop.
5 There are several Chaurāsis, a grant of an estate of this special size being common under native
rule.

6 Boswellia serrata.
7 Eugenia Jambolana.

8 2 lbs.
9 Elliot, Hoshangābād Settlement Report, p. 115.

10 The custom is pointed out by Mr. A. K. Smith, C.S.
11 Central Provinces Census Report (1911), p. 153.

12 C.P. Census Report (1911), p. 153.
13 Or his big toe.

14 C.P. Census Report (1911), p. 158.
15 In Indian Folk Tales.

16 Ficus R.
17 He is also known as Katia or Kattaha Brāhman and as Mahāpātra.

18 Indian Folk Tales, p. 54.

Page 138

19 Sorghum vulgare, a large millet.

20 Dr. Jevons, Introduction to the History of Religion, p. 365.
21 A measure of 400 lbs.

22 Butea frondosa.
23 A measure containing 9 lb. 2 oz. of rice.

24 Ficus glomerata.
25 From Ganga, or the Ganges, and āla a pot.

26 Cajanus indicus.
27 Phaseolus mungo.

28 Phaseolus radiatus.
29 Bombax malabaricum.

30 Acacia arabica.
31 Cassia tora.

32 Punjab Census Report (1881), p. 340.

Page 139

Page 140

Lakhera
List of Paragraphs

1. General notice
2. Social customs
3. The lac industry
4. Lac bangles
5. Red, a lucky colour
6. Vermilion and spangles
7. Red dye on the feet
8. Red threads
9. Lac toys

1. General notice

Lakhera, Laheri.—The small caste whose members make bangles and
other articles of lac. About 3000 persons were shown as belonging to the
caste in the Central Provinces in 1911, being most numerous in the
Jubbulpore, Chhīndwāra and Betūl Districts. From Berār 150 persons were
returned, chiefly from Amraoti. The name is derived from the Sanskrit
laksha-kara, a worker in lac. The caste are a mixed functional group closely
connected with the Kacheras and Patwas; no distinction being recognised
between the Patwas and Lakheras in some localities of the Central
Provinces. Mr. Baillie gives the following notice of them in the Census
Report of the North-Western Provinces (1891): “The accounts given by
members of the caste of their origin are very various and sometimes
ingenious. One story is that like the Patwas, with whom they are connected,
they were originally Kāyasths. According to another account they were made

Page 141

from the dirt washed from Pārvati before her marriage with Siva, being
created by the god to make bangles for his wife, and hence called Deobansi.
Again, it is stated, they were created by Krishna to make bangles for the
Gopis or milkmaids. The most elaborate account is that they were originally
Yāduvansi Rājpūts, who assisted the Kurus to make a fort of lac, in which
the Pāndavas were to be treacherously burned. For this traitorous conduct
they were degraded and compelled eternally to work in lac or glass.”

2. Social customs

The bulk of these artisan and manufacturing castes tell stories showing that
their ancestors were Kāyasths and Rājpūts, but no importance can be
attached to such legends, which are obviously manufactured by the family
priests to minister to the harmless vanity of their clients. To support their
claim the Lakheras have divided themselves like the Rājpūts into the
Sūrajvansi and Somvansi subcastes or those who belong to the Solar and
Lunar races. Other subdivisions are the Mārwāri or those coming from
Mārwār in Rājpūtana, and the Tarkhera or makers of the large earrings which
low-caste women wear. These consist of a circular piece of wood or fibre,
nearly an inch across, which is worked through a large hole in the lobe of the
ear. It is often the stalk of the ambāri fibre, and on the outer end is fixed a
slab decorated with little pieces of glass. The exogamous sections of the
Lakheras are generally named after animals, plants and natural objects, and
indicate that the caste is recruited from the lower classes of the population.
Their social customs resemble those of the middle and lower Hindustāni
castes. Girls are married at an early age when the parents can afford the
expense of the ceremony, but no penalty is incurred if the wedding is
postponed for want of means. The remarriage of widows and divorce are
permitted. They eat flesh, but not fowls or pork, and some of them drink
liquor, while others abstain. Rājpūts and Banias will take water from them,
but not Brāhmans. In Bombay, however, they are considered to rank above
Kunbis.

Page 142

3. The lac industry

The traditional occupation of the Lakheras is to make and sell bangles and
other articles of lac. Lac is regarded with a certain degree of superstitious
repugnance by the Hindus because of its red colour, resembling blood. On
this account and also because of the sin committed in killing them, no Hindu
caste will propagate the lac insect, and the calling is practised only by
Gonds, Korkus and other primitive tribes. Even Gonds will often refuse
employment in growing lac if they can make their living by cultivation.
Various superstitions attach to the propagation of the insects to a fresh tree.
This is done in Kunwār (September) and always by men, the insects being
carried in a leaf-cup and placed on a branch of an uninfected tree, usually the
kusum.1 It is said that the work should be done at night and the man should
be naked when he places the insects on the tree. The tree is fenced round and
nobody is allowed to touch it, as it is considered that the crop would thus be
spoiled. If a woman has lost her husband and has to sow lac, she takes her
son in her arms and places the cup containing the insects on his head; on
arriving at the tree she manages to apply the insects by means of a stick, not
touching the cup with her own hands. All this ritual attaches simply to the
infection of the first tree, and afterwards in January or February the insects
are propagated on to other trees without ceremony. The juice of onions is
dropped on to them to make them healthy. The stick-lac is collected by the
Gonds and Korkus and sold to the Lakheras; they clear it of wood as far as
possible and then place the incrusted twigs and bark in long cotton bags and
heat them before a fire, squeezing out the gum, which is spread out on flat
plates so as to congeal into the shape of a pancake. This is again heated and
mixed with white clay and forms the material for the bangles. They are
coloured with chapra, the pure gum prepared like sealing-wax, which is
mixed with vermilion, or arsenic and turmeric for a yellow colour. In some
localities at least only the Lakheras and Patwas and no higher caste will sell
articles made of lac.

Page 143

Examples of spangles worn by women on the forehead

4. Lac bangles

The trade in lac bangles has now greatly declined, as they have been
supplanted by the more ornamental glass bangles. They are thick and clumsy
and five of them will cover a large part of the space between the elbow and
the wrist. They may be observed on Banjāra women. Lac bangles are also
still used by the Hindus, generally on ceremonial occasions, as at a marriage,
when they are presented to and worn by the bride, and during the month of
Shrāwan (July), when the Hindus observe a fast on behalf of the growing
crops and the women wear bangles of lac. For these customs Mr. Hīra Lāl
suggests the explanation that lac bangles were at one time generally worn by
the Hindus, while glass ones are a comparatively recent fashion introduced
by the Muhammadans. In support of this it may be urged that glass bangles
are largely made by the Muhammadan Turkāri or Sīsgar, and also that lac
bangles must have been worn prior to glass ones, because if the latter had
been known the clumsy and unornamental bracelet made of lac and clay

Page 144

could never have come into existence. The wearing of lac bangles on the
above occasions would therefore be explained according to the common
usage of adhering on religious and ceremonial occasions to the more ancient
methods and accessories, which are sanctified by association and custom.
Similarly the Holi pyre is often kindled with fire produced by the friction of
wood, and temples are lighted with vegetable instead of mineral oil.

5. Red, a lucky colour

It may be noted, however, that lac bangles are not always worn by the bride
at a wedding, the custom being unknown in some localities. Moreover, it
appears that glass was known to the Hindus at a period prior to the
Muhammadan invasions, though bangles may not have been made from it.
Another reason for the use of lac bangles on the occasions noticed is that lac,
as already seen, represents blood. Though blood itself is now repugnant to
the Hindus, yet red is pre-eminently their lucky colour, being worn at
weddings and generally preferred. It is suggested in the Bombay Gazetteer2
that blood was lucky as having been the first food of primitive man, who
learnt to suck the blood of animals before he ate their flesh. But it does not
seem necessary to go back quite so far as this. The earliest form of sacrifice,
as shown by Professor Robertson Smith,3 was that in which the community
of kinsmen ate together the flesh of their divine or totem animal god and
drank its blood. When the god became separated from the animal and was
represented by a stone at the place of worship and the people had ceased to
eat raw flesh and drink blood, the blood was poured out over the stone as an
offering to the god. This practice still obtains among the lower castes of
Hindus and the primitive tribes, the blood of animals offered to Devi and
other village deities being allowed to drop on to the stones representing
them. But the higher castes of Hindus have abandoned animal sacrifices, and
hence cannot make the blood-offering. In place of it they smear the stone
with vermilion, which seems obviously a substitute for blood, since it is used
to colour the stones representing the deities in exactly the same manner.
Even vermilion, however, is not offered to the highest deities of Neo-

Page 145

Hinduism, Siva or Mahādeo and Vishnu, to whom animal sacrifices would
be abhorrent. It is offered to Hanumān, whose image is covered with it, and
to Devi and Bhairon and to the many local and village deities. In past times
animal sacrifices were offered to Bhairon, as they still are to Devi, and
though it is not known that they were made to Hanumān, this is highly
probable, as he is the god of strength and a mighty warrior. The Mānbhao
mendicants, who abhor all forms of bloodshed like the Jains, never pass one
of these stones painted with vermilion if they can avoid doing so, and if they
are aware that there is one on their road will make a circuit so as not to see
it.4 There seems, therefore, every reason to suppose that vermilion is a
substitute for blood in offerings and hence probably on other occasions. As
the places of the gods were thus always coloured red with blood, red would
come to be the divine and therefore the propitious colour among the Hindus
and other races.

6. Vermilion and spangles

Among the constituents of the Sohāg or lucky trousseau without which no
Hindu girl of good caste can be married are sendur or vermilion, kunku or
red powder or a spangle (tikli), and mahāwar or red balls of cotton-wool. In
Chhattīsgarh and Bengal the principal marriage rite is usually the smearing
of vermilion by the bridegroom on the parting of the bride’s hair, and
elsewhere this is commonly done as a subsidiary ceremony. Here also there
is little reason to doubt that vermilion is a substitute for blood; indeed, in
some castes in Bengal, as noted by Sir H. Risley, the blood of the parties is
actually mixed.5 This marking of the bride with blood is a result of the
sacrifice and communal feast of kinsmen already described; only those who
could join in the sacrificial meal and eat the flesh of the sacred animal god
were kin to it and to each other; but in quite early times the custom prevailed
of taking wives from outside the clan; and consequently, to admit the wife
into her husband’s kin, it was necessary that she also should drink or be
marked with the blood of the god. The mixing of blood at marriage appears
to be a relic of this, and the marking of the forehead with vermilion is a

Page 146

substitute for the anointing with blood. Kunku is a pink powder made of
turmeric, lime-juice and borax, which last is called by the Hindus ‘the milk
of Anjini,’ the mother of Hanumān. It seems to be a more agreeable
substitute for vermilion, whose constant use has probably an injurious effect
on the skin and hair. Kunku is used in the Marātha country in the same way
as vermilion, and a married woman will smear a little patch on her forehead
every day and never allow her husband to see her without it. She omits it
only during the monthly period of impurity. The tikli or spangle is worn in
the Hindustāni Districts and not in the south. It consists of a small piece of
lac over which is smeared vermilion, while above it a piece of mica or thin
glass is fixed for ornament. Other adornments may be added, and women
from Rājputāna, such as the Mārwāri Banias and Banjāras, wear large
spangles set in gold with a border of jewels if they can afford it. The spangle
is made and sold by Lakheras and Patwas; it is part of the Sohāg at
marriages and is affixed to the girl’s forehead on her wedding and thereafter
always worn; as a rule, if a woman has a spangle it is said that she does not
smear vermilion on her forehead, though both may occasionally be seen. The
name tikli is simply a corruption of tīka, which means a mark of anointing or
initiation on the forehead; as has been seen, the basis of the tikli is vermilion
smeared on lac-clay, and it is made by Lakheras; and there is thus good
reason to suppose that the spangle is also a more ornamental substitute for
the smear of vermilion, the ancient blood-mark by which a married woman
was admitted into her husband’s clan. At her marriage a bride must always
receive the glass bangles and the vermilion, kunku, or spangle from her
husband, the other ornaments of the Sohāg being usually given to her by her
parents. Unmarried girls now also sometimes wear small ornamental
spangles, and put kunku on their foreheads. But before marriage it is optional
and afterwards compulsory. A widow may not wear vermilion, kunku, or
spangles.

7. Red dye on the feet

Page 147

The Lakheras also sell balls of red cotton-wool known as māhur ki guleli or
mahāwar. The cotton-wool is dipped in the melted lac-gum and is rubbed on
to the feet of women to colour them red or pink at marriages and festivals.
This is done by the barber’s wife, who will colour the feet of the whole
party, at the same time drawing lines round the outside of the foot and
inward from the toes. The mahāwar is also an essential part of the Sohāg of
marriage. Instead of lac the Muhammadans use mehndi or henna, the henna-
leaves being pounded with catechu and the mixture rubbed on to the feet and
hands. After a little time it is washed off and a red dye remains on the skin. It
is supposed that the similar custom which prevailed among the ancient
Greeks is alluded to in the epithet of ‘rosy-fingered Aurora.’ The Hindus use
henna dye only in the month Shrāwan (July), which is a period of fasting;
the auspicious kunku and mahāwar are therefore perhaps not considered
suitable at such a time, but as special protection is needed against evil spirits,
the necessary red colouring is obtained from henna. When a married woman
rubs henna on her hands, if the dye comes out a deep red tinge, the other
women say that her husband is not in love with her; but if of a pale yellowish
tinge, that he is very much in love.

8. Red threads

The Lakheras and Patwas also make the kardora or waist-band of red thread.
This is worn by Hindu men and women, except Marātha Brāhmans. After he
is married, if a man breaks this thread he must not take food until he has put
on a fresh one, and the same rule applies to a woman all her life. Other
threads are the rākhis tied round the wrists for protection against evil spirits
on the day of Rakshābandhan, and the necklets of silk or cotton thread
wound round with thin silver wire, which the Hindus put on at Anant
Chaudas and frequently retain for the whole year. The colour of all these
threads is generally red in the first place, but they soon get blackened by
contact with the skin.

Page 148

9. Lac toys

Toys of lac are especially made during the fast of Shrāwan (July). At this
time for five years after her marriage a Hindu bride receives annually from
her husband a present called Shrāoni, or that which is given in Shrāwan. It
consists of a chakri or reel, to which a string is attached, and the reel is
thrown up into the air and wound and unwound on the string; a bhora or
wooden top spun by a string; a bansuli or wooden flute; a stick and ball, lac
bangles and a spangle, and cloth, usually of red chintz. All these toys are
made by the carpenter and coloured red with lac by the Lakhera, with the
exception of the bangles which may be yellow or green. For five years the
bride plays with the toys, and then they are sent to her no longer as her
childhood has passed. It is probable that some, if not all of them, are in a
manner connected with the crops, and supposed to have a magical influence,
because during the same period it is the custom for boys to walk on stilts and
play at swinging themselves; and in these cases the original idea is to make
the crops grow as high as the stilts or swing. As in the other cases, the red
colour appears to have a protective influence against evil spirits, who are
more than usually active at a time of fasting.

1 Schleichera trijuga.

2 Hindus of Gujarat, App., art. Vaghri, footnote.
3 Religion of the Semites.
4 Mackintosh, Report on the Mānbhaos..
5 See articles on Khairwār and Kewat.

Page 149

Lodhi
List of Paragraphs

1. Origin and traditions
2. Position in the central Provinces
3. Sub-divisions
4. Exogamous groups
5. Marriage customs
6. The gauna ceremoney. Fertility rites
7. Widow-marriage and puberty rite
8. Mourning impurity
9. Social customs
10. Greetings and method of address
11. Sacred thread and social status

1. Origin and traditions

Lodhi, Lodha.—An important agricultural caste residing principally in the
Vindhyan Districts and Nerbudda valley, whence they have spread to the
Wainganga valley and the Khairāgarh State of Chhattīsgarh. Their total
strength in the Province is 300,000 persons. The Lodhis are immigrants from
the United Provinces, in whose Gazetteers it is stated that they belonged
originally to the Ludhiāna District and took their name from it. Their proper
designation is Lodha, but it has become corrupted to Lodhi in the Central
Provinces. A number of persons resident in the Harda tahsīl of Hoshangābād
are called Lodha and say that they are distinct from the Lodhis. There is
nothing to support their statement, however, and it is probable that they
simply represent the separate wave of immigration which took place from

Page 150

Central India into the Hoshangābād and Betūl Districts in the fifteenth
century. They spoke a different dialect of the group known as Rajasthāni,
and hence perhaps the caste-name did not get corrupted. The Lodhis of the
Jubbulpore Division probably came here at a later date from northern India.
The Mandla Lodhis are said to have been brought to the District by Raja
Hirde Sah of the Gond-Rājpūt dynasty of Garha-Mandla in the seventeenth
century, and they were given large grants of the waste land in the interior in
order that they might clear it of forest.1 The Lodhis are a good instance of a
caste who have obtained a great rise in social status on migrating to a new
area. In northern India Mr. Nesfield places them lowest among the
agricultural castes and states that they are little better than a forest tribe. He
derives the name from lod, a clod, according to which Lodhi would mean
clodhopper.2 Another suggestion is that the name is derived from the bark of
the lodh tree,3 which is collected by the Lodhas in northern India and sold
for use as a dyeing agent. In Bulandshahr they are described as “Of short
stature and uncouth appearance, and from this as well as from their want of a
tradition of immigration from other parts they appear to be a mixed class
proceeding from aboriginal and Aryan parents. In the Districts below Agra
they are considered so low that no one drinks water touched by them; but
this is not the case in the Districts above Agra.”4 In Hamīrpur they appear to
have some connection with the Kurmis, and a story told of them in Saugor is
that the first Lodhi was created by Mahādeo from a scarecrow in a Kurmi
woman’s field and given the vocation of a farmservant But the Lodhis
themselves claim Rājpūt ancestry and say that they are descended from
Lava, the eldest of the two sons of Rāja Rāmchandra of Ajodhya.

2. Position in the central Provinces

In the Central Provinces they have become landholders and are addressed by
the honorific title of Thākur, ranking with the higher cultivating castes.
Several Lodhi landholders in Damoh and Saugor formerly held a quasi-
independent position under the Muhammadans, and subsequently
acknowledged the Raja of Panna as their suzerain, who conferred on some

Page 151

families the titles of Rāja and Diwān. They kept up a certain amount of state,
and small contingents of soldiery, attended by whom they went to pay their
respects to the representative of the ruling power. “It would be difficult,”
says Grant,5 “to recognise the descendants of the peaceful cultivators of
northern India in the strangely accoutred Rājas who support their style and
title by a score of ragged matchlock-men and a ruined mud fort on a hill-
side.” Sir B. Fuller’s Damoh Settlement Report says of them: “A
considerable number of villages had been for long time past in the
possession of certain important families, who held them by prescription or
by a grant from the ruling power, on a right which approximated as nearly to
the English idea of proprietorship as native custom permitted. The most
prominent of these families were of the Lodhi caste. They have developed
tastes for sport and freebooting and have become decidedly the most
troublesome item in the population. During the Mutiny the Lodhis as a class
were openly disaffected, and one of their proprietors, the Tālukdār of
Hindoria, marched on the District headquarters and looted the treasury.”
Similarly the Ramgarh family of Mandla took to arms and lost the large
estates till then held by them. On the other hand the village of Imjhira in
Narsinghpur belonging to a Lodhi mālguzār was gallantly defended against a
band of marauding rebels from Saugor. Sir R. Craddock describes them as
follows: “They are men of strong character, but their constant family feuds
and love of faction militate against their prosperity. A cluster of Lodhi
villages forms a hotbed of strife and the nearest relations are generally
divided by bitter animosities. The Revenue Officer who visits them is beset
by reckless charges and counter-charges and no communities are less
amenable to conciliatory compromises. Agrarian outrages are only too
common in some of the Lodhi villages.”6 The high status of the Lodhi caste
in the Central Provinces as compared with their position in the country of
their origin may be simply explained by the fact that they here became
landholders and ruling chiefs.

3. Sub-divisions

Page 152

In the northern Districts the landholding Lodhis are divided into a number of
exogamous clans who marry with each other in imitation of the Rājpūts.
These are the Mahdele, Kerbania, Dongaria, Narwaria, Bhadoria and others.
The name of the Kerbanias is derived from Kerbana, a village in Damoh,
and the Bālākote family of that District are the head of the clan. The
Mahdeles are the highest clan and have the titles of Rāja and Diwān, while
the others hold those of Rao and Kunwar, the terms Diwān and Kunwar
being always applied to the younger brother of the head of the house. These
titles are still occasionally conferred by the Rāja of Panna, whom the Lodhi
clans looked on as their suzerain. The name of the Mahdeles is said to be
derived from the mehndi or henna plant. The above clans sometimes practise
hypergamy among themselves and also with the other Lodhis, taking
daughters from the latter on receipt of a large bridegroom-price for the
honour conferred by the marriage. This custom is now, however, tending to
die out. There are also several endogamous subcastes ranking below the
clans, of whom the principal are the Singrore, Jarha, Jāngra and Mahālodhi.
The Singrore take their name from the old town of Singraur or Shrengera in
northern India, Singrore, like Kanaujia, being a common subcaste name
among several castes. It is also connected more lately with the Singrām Ghat
or ferry of the Ganges in Allahābād District, and the title of Rāwat is said to
have been conferred on the Singrore Lodhis by the emperor Akbar on a visit
there. The Jarha Lodhis belong to Mandla. The name is probably a form of
Jharia or jungly, but since the leading members of the caste have become
large landholders they repudiate this derivation. The Jāngra Lodhis are of
Chhattīsgarh, and the Mahālodhis or ‘Great Lodhis’ are an inferior group to
which the offspring of irregular unions are or were relegated. The
Mahalodhis are said to condone adultery either by a man or woman on
penalty of a feast to the caste. Other groups are the Hardiha, who grow
turmeric (haldi), and the Gwālhare or cowherds. The Lodhas of
Hoshangābād may also be considered a separate subcaste. They disclaim
connection with the Lodhis, but the fact that the parent caste in the United
Provinces is known as Lodha appears to establish their identity. They abstain
from flesh and liquor, which most Lodhis consume.

This division of the superior branch of a caste into large exogamous clans
and the lower one into endogamous subcastes is only found, so far as is

Page 153

known, among the Rājpūts and one or two landholding castes who have
imitated them. Its origin is discussed in the Introduction.

4. Exogamous groups

The subcastes are as usual divided into exogamous groups of the territorial,
titular and totemistic classes. Among sections named after places may be
mentioned the Chāndpuria from Chāndpur, the Kharpuria from Kharpur, and
the Nāgpuriha, Raipuria, Dhamonia, Damauha and Shāhgariha from Nāgpur,
Raipur, Dhamoni, Damoh and Shāhgarh. Two-thirds of the sections have the
names of towns or villages. Among titular names are Saulākhia, owner of
100 lakhs, Bhainsmār, one who killed a buffalo, Kodonchor, one who stole
kodon,7 Kumharha perhaps from Kumhār a potter, and Rājbhar and Barhai
(carpenter), names of castes. Among totemistic names are Baghela, tiger,
also the name of a Rājpūt sept; Kutria, a dog; Khajūria, the date-palm tree;
Mirchaunia, chillies; Andwār, from the castor-oil plant; Bhainsaiya, a
buffalo; and Nāk, the nose.

5. Marriage customs

A man must not marry in his own section nor in that of his mother. He may
marry two sisters. The exchange of girls between families is only in force
among the Bilāspur Lodhis, who say, ‘Eat with those who have eaten with
you and marry with those who have married with you.’ Girls are usually
wedded before puberty, but in the northern Districts the marriage is
sometimes postponed from desire to marry into a good family or from want
of funds to pay a bridegroom-price, and girls of twenty or more may be
unmarried. A case is known of a man who had two daughters unmarried at
twenty-two and twenty-three years old, because he had been waiting for

Page 154

good partis, with the result that one of them went and lived with a man and
he then married off the other in the Singhast8 year, which is forbidden
among the Lodhis, and was put out of caste. The marriage and other
ceremonies of the Lodhis resemble those of the Kurmis, except in
Chhattīsgarh where the Marātha fashion is followed. Here, at the wedding,
the bride and bridegroom hold between them a doll made of dough with 21
cowries inside, and as the priest repeats the marriage texts they pull it apart
like a cracker and see how many cowries each has got. It is considered
auspicious if the bridegroom has the larger number. The priest is on the roof
of the house, and before the wedding he cries out:

‘Are the king and queen here?’ And a man below answers, ‘Yes.’

‘Have they shoes on their feet?’ ‘Yes.’

‘Have they bracelets on their hands?’ ‘Yes.’

‘Have they rings in their ears?’ ‘Yes.’

‘Have they crowns on their heads?’ ‘Yes.’

‘Has she glass beads round her neck?’ ‘Yes.’

‘Have they the doll in their hands?’ ‘Yes.’

And the priest then repeats the marriage texts and beats a brass dish while
the doll is pulled apart In the northern Districts after the wedding the
bridegroom must untie one of the festoons of the marriage-shed, and if he
refuses to do this, it is an indelible disgrace on the bride’s party. Before
doing so he requires a valuable present, such as a buffalo.

6. The gauna ceremoney. Fertility rites

Page 155

When the girl becomes mature the Gauna or going-away ceremony is
performed. In Chhattīsgarh before leaving her home the bride goes out with
her sister and worships a palās tree.9 Her sister waves a lighted lamp seven
times over it, and the bride goes seven times round it in imitation of the
marriage ceremony. At her husband’s house seven pictures of the family
gods are drawn on a wall inside the house and the bride worships these,
placing a little sugar and bread on the mouth of each and bowing before
them. She is then seated before the family god while an old woman brings a
stone rolling-pin10 wrapped up in a piece of cloth, which is supposed to be a
baby, and the old woman imitates a baby crying. She puts the roller in the
bride’s lap saying, ‘Take this and give it milk.’ The bride is abashed and
throws it aside. The old woman picks it up and shows it to the assembled
women saying, ‘The bride has just had a baby,’ amid loud laughter. Then she
gives the stone to the bridegroom who also throws it aside. This ceremony is
meant to induce fertility, and it is supposed that by making believe that the
bride has had a baby she will quickly have one.

7. Widow-marriage and puberty rite

The higher clans of Lodhis in Damoh and Saugor prohibit the remarriage of
widows, but instances of it occur. It is said that a man who marries a widow
is relegated to the Mahālodhi subcaste or the Lahuri Sen, an illegitimate
group, and the Lodhis of his clan no longer acknowledge his family. But if a
girl’s husband dies before she has lived with him she may marry again. The
other Lodhis freely permit widow-marriage and divorce. When a girl first
becomes mature she is secluded, and though she may stay in the house
cannot enter the cook-room. At the end of the period she is dressed in red
cloth, and a present of cocoanuts stripped of their shells, sweetmeats, and a
little money, is placed in her lap, while a few women are invited to a feast.
This rite is also meant to induce fertility, the kernel of the cocoanut being
held to resemble an unborn baby.

Page 156

8. Mourning impurity

The higher clans consider themselves impure for a period of 12 days after a
birth, and if the birth falls in the Mūl asterism or Nakshatra, for 27 days.
After death they observe mourning for 10 days; on the 10th day they offer
ten pindas or funeral cakes, and on the 11th day make one large pinda or
cake and divide it into eleven parts; on the 12th day they make sixteen
pindas and unite the spirit of the dead man with the ancestors; and on the
13th day they give a feast and feed Brāhmans and are clean. The lower
subcastes only observe impurity for three days after a birth and a death.
Their funeral rites are the same as those of the Kurmis.

9. Social customs

The caste employ Brāhmans for weddings, but not necessarily for birth and
death ceremonies. They eat flesh and fish, and the bulk of the caste eat fowls
and drink liquor, but the landowning section abjures these practices. They
will take food cooked with water from Brāhmans, and that cooked without
water also from Rājpūts, Kāyasths and Sunārs. In Narsinghpur they also
accept cooked food from such a low caste as Rājjahrs,11 probably because
the Rājjhars are commonly employed by them as farmservants, and hence
have been accustomed to carry their master’s food. A similar relation has
been found to exist between the Panwār Rājpūts and their Gond
farmservants. The higher class Lodhis make an inordinate show of
hospitality at their weddings. The plates of the guests are piled up profusely
with food, and these latter think it a point of honour never to refuse it or say
enough. When melted butter is poured out into their cups the stream must
never be broken as it passes from one guest to the other, or it is said that they

Page 157

will all get up and leave the feast. Apparently a lot of butter must be wasted
on the ground. The higher clans seclude their women, and these when they
go out must wear long clothes covering the head and reaching to the feet.
The women are not allowed to wear ornaments of a cheaper metal than
silver, except of course their glass bangles. The Mahālodhis will eat food
cooked with water in the cook-room and carried to the fields, which the
higher clans will not do. Their women wear the sāri drawn through the legs
and knotted behind according to the Maratha fashion, but whenever they
meet their husband’s elder brother or any other elder of the family they must
undo the knot and let the cloth hang down round their legs as a mark of
respect. They wear no breast-cloth. Girls are tattooed before adolescence
with dots on the chin and forehead, and marks on one hand. Before she is
tattooed the girl is given sweets to eat, and during the process the operator
sings songs in order that her attention may be diverted and she may not feel
the pain. After she has finished the operator mutters a charm to prevent evil
spirits from troubling the girl and causing her pain.

10. Greetings and method of address

The caste have some strict taboos on names and on conversation between the
sexes. A man will only address his wife, sister, daughter, paternal aunt or
niece directly. If he has occasion to speak to some other woman he will take
his daughter or other female relative with him and do his business through
her. He will not speak even to his own women before a crowd. A woman will
similarly only speak to her father, son or nephew, and father-, son- or
younger brother-in-law. She will not speak to her elder brother-in-law, and
she will not address her husband in the presence of his father, elder brother
or any other relative whom he reveres. A wife will never call her husband by
his name, but always address him as father of her son, and, if she has no son,
will sometimes speak to him through his younger brother. Neither the father
nor mother will call their eldest son by his name, but will use some other
name. Similarly a daughter-in-law is given a fresh name on coming into the
house, and on her arrival her mother-in-law looks at her for the first time

Page 158

through a guna or ring of baked gram-flour. A man meeting his father or
elder brother will touch his feet in silence. One meeting his sister’s husband,
sister’s son or son-in-law, will touch his feet and say, ‘Sāhib, salaam.’

11. Sacred thread and social status

The higher clans invest boys with the sacred thread either when they are
initiated by a Guru or spiritual preceptor, or when they are married. The
thread is made by a Brāhman and has five knots. Recently a large landholder
in Mandla, a Jarha Lodhi, has assumed the sacred thread himself for the first
time and sent round a circular to his caste-men enjoining them also to wear
it. His family priest has produced a legend of the usual type showing how
the Jarha Lodhis are Rājpūts whose ancestors threw away their sacred
threads in order to escape the vengeance of Parasurāma. Generally in social
position the Lodhis may be considered to rank with, but slightly above, the
ordinary cultivating castes, such as the Kurmis. This superiority in no way
arises from their origin, since, as already seen, they are a very low caste in
their home in northern India, but from the fact that they have become large
landholders in the Central Provinces and in former times their leaders
exercised quasi-sovereign powers. Many Lodhis are fine-looking men and
have still some appearance of having been soldiers. They are passionate and
quarrelsome, especially in the Jubbulpore District. This is put forcibly in the
saying that ‘A Lodhi’s temper is as crooked as the stream of a bullock’s
urine.’ They are generally cultivators, but the bulk of them are not very
prosperous as they are inclined to extravagance and display at weddings and
on other ceremonial occasions.

1 Colonel Ward’s Mandia Settlement Report p. 29.

2 Brief View of the Caste System, p. 14.
3 Symplocos racemosa.

4 Rāja Lachman Singh’s Bulandshahr Memo, p. 182, quoted in Mr. Crooke’s Tribes and Castes,
art. Lodha.

Page 159

5 Narsinghpur Settlement Report (1866), p. 28.

6 Nagpur Settlement Report, p. 24.
7 A small millet.

8 Every twelfth year when the planet Jupiter is in conjunction with the constellation Sinh (Leo).
9 Butea Frondosa.

10 This is known as lodha.
11 The Rājjhars are a low caste of farmservants and labourers, probably an offshoot of the Bhar
tribe.

Page 160

Lohar

1. Legends of the caste

Lohar, Khati, Ghantra, Ghisāri, Panchāl.—The occupational caste of
blacksmiths. The name is derived from the Sanskrit Lauha-kara>, a worker
in iron. In the Central Provinces the Loharhas in the past frequently
combined the occupations of carpenter and blacksmith, and in such a
capacity he is known as Khāti. The honorific designations applied to the
caste are Karīgar, which means skilful, and Mistri, a corruption of the
English ‘Master’ or ‘Mister.’ In 1911 the Lohārs numbered about 180,000
persons in the Central Provinces and Berār. The Lohār is indispensable to the
village economy, and the caste is found over the whole rural area of the
Province.

“Practically all the Lohārs,” Mr. Crooke writes1, “trace their origin to
Visvakarma, who is the later representative of the Vedic Twashtri, the
architect and handicraftsman of the gods, ‘The fashioner of all ornaments,
the most eminent of artisans, who formed the celestial chariots of the deities,
on whose craft men subsist, and whom, a great and immortal god, they
continually worship,’ One2 tradition tells that Visvakarma was a Brāhman
and married the daughter of an Ahīr, who in her previous birth had been a
dancing-girl of the gods. By her he had nine sons, who became the ancestors
of various artisan castes, such as the Lohār, Barhai, Sunār, and Kasera.”

The Lohārs of the Uriya country in the Central Provinces tell a similar story,
according to which Kamar, the celestial architect, had twelve sons. The
eldest son was accustomed to propitiate the family god with wine, and one
day he drank some of the wine, thinking that it could not be sinful to do so as

Page 161

it was offered to the deity. But for this act his other brothers refused to live
with him and left their home, adopting various professions; but the eldest
brother became a worker in iron and laid a curse upon the others that they
should not be able to practise their calling except with the implements which
he had made. The second brother thus became a woodcutter (Barhai), the
third a painter (Mahārana), the fourth learnt the science of vaccination and
medicine and became a vaccinator (Suthiār), the fifth a goldsmith, the sixth a
brass-smith, the seventh a coppersmith, and the eighth a carpenter, while the
ninth brother was weak in the head and married his eldest sister, on account
of which fact his descendants are known as Ghantra.3 The Ghantras are an
inferior class of blacksmiths, probably an offshoot from some of the forest
tribes, who are looked down on by the others. It is said that even to the
present day the Ghantra Lohārs have no objection to eating the leavings of
food of their wives, whom they regard as their eldest sisters.

2. Social position of the Lohar

The above story is noticeable as indicating that the social position of the
Lohār is somewhat below that of the other artisan castes, or at least of those
who work in metals. This fact has been recorded in other localities, and has
been explained by some stigma arising from his occupation, as in the
following passage: “His social position is low even for a menial, and he is
classed as an impure caste, in so far that Jāts and others of similar standing
will have no social communion with him, though not as an outcast like the
scavenger. His impurity, like that of the barber, washerman and dyer, springs
solely from the nature of his employment; perhaps because it is a dirty one,
but more probably because black is a colour of evil omen. It is not
improbable that the necessity under which he labours of using bellows made
of cowhide may have something to do with his impurity,”4

Mr. Nesfield also says: “It is owing to the ubiquitous industry of the Lohār
that the stone knives, arrow-heads and hatchets of the indigenous tribes of
Upper India have been so entirely superseded by iron-ores. The memory of

Page 162

the stone age has not survived even in tradition. In consequence of the evil
associations which Hinduism has attached to the colour of black, the caste of
Lohār has not been able to raise itself to the same social level as the three
metallurgic castes which follow.” The following saying also indicates that
the Lohār is of evil omen:

Ar, Dhār, Chuchkār
In tinon se bachāwe Kartār.

Here Ar means an iron goad and signifies the Lohār; Dhār represents the
sound of the oil falling from the press and means a Teli or oilman; Chuchkār
is an imitation of the sound of clothes being beaten against a stone and
denotes the Dhobi or washerman; and the phrase thus runs, ‘My Friend,
beware of the Lohār, Teli, and Dhobi, for they are of evil omen.’ It is not
quite clear why this disrepute should attach to the Lohār, because iron itself
is lucky, though its colour, black, may be of bad omen. But the low status of
the Lohār may partly arise from the fact of his being a village menial and a
servant of the cultivators; whereas the trades of the goldsmith, brass-smith
and carpenter are of later origin than the blacksmith’s, and are urban rather
than rural industries; and thus these artisans do not commonly occupy the
position of village menials. Another important consideration is that the iron
industry is associated with the primitive tribes, who furnished the whole
supply of the metal prior to its importation from Europe: and it is hence
probable that the Lohār caste was originally constituted from these and
would thus naturally be looked down upon by the Hindus. In Bengal, where
few or no traces of the village community remain, the Lohār ranks as the
equal of Koiris and Kurmis, and Brāhmans will take water from his hands;5
and this somewhat favours the argument that his lower status elsewhere is
not due to incidents of his occupation.

3. Caste subdivisions

Page 163

The constitution of the Lohār caste is of a heterogeneous nature. In some
localities Gonds who work as blacksmiths are considered to belong to the
caste and are known as Gondi Lohārs. But Hindus who work in Gond
villages also sometimes bear this designation. Another subdivision returned
consists of the Agarias, also an offshoot of the Gonds, who collect and smelt
iron-ore in the Vindhyan and Satpūra hills. The Panchāls are a class of
itinerant smiths in Berār. The Ghantras or inferior blacksmiths of the Uriya
country have already been noticed. The Ghisāris are a similar low class of
smiths in the southern Districts who do rough work only, but sometimes
claim Rājpūt origin. Other subcastes are of the usual local or territorial type,
as Mahūlia, from Māhul in Berār; Jhāde or Jhādia, those living in the
jungles; Ojha, or those professing a Brāhmanical origin; Marātha, Kanaujia,
Mathuria, and so on.

4. Marriage and other customs

Infant-marriage is the custom of the caste, and the ceremony is that prevalent
among the agricultural castes of the locality. The remarriage of widows is
permitted, and they have the privilege of selecting their own husbands, or at
least of refusing to accept any proposed suitor. A widow is always married
from her father’s house, and never from that of her deceased husband. The
first husband’s property is taken by his relatives, if there be any, and they
also assume the custody of his children as soon as they are old enough to
dispense with a mother’s care. The dead are both buried and burnt, and in the
eastern Districts some water and a tooth-stick are daily placed at a cross-road
for the use of the departed spirit during the customary period of mourning,
which extends to ten days. On the eleventh day the relatives go and bathe,
and the chief mourner puts on a new loin-cloth. Some rice is taken and seven
persons pass it from hand to hand. They then pound the rice, and making
from it a figure to represent a human being, they place some grain in its
mouth and say to it, ‘Go and become incarnate in some human being,’ and
throw the image into the water. After this the impurity caused by the death is
removed, and they go home and feast with their friends. In the evening they

Page 164

make cakes of rice, and place them seven times on the shoulder of each
person who has carried the corpse to the cemetery or pyre, to remove the
impurity contracted from touching it. It is also said that if this be not done
the shoulder will feel the weight of the coffin for a period of six months. The
caste endeavour to ascertain whether the spirit of the dead person returns to
join in the funeral feast, and in what shape it will be born again. For this
purpose rice-flour is spread on the floor of the cooking-room and covered
with a brass plate. The women retire and sit in an adjoining room while the
chief mourner with a few companions goes outside the village, and sprinkles
some more rice-flour on the ground. They call to the deceased person by
name, saying, ‘Come, come,’ and then wait patiently till some worm or
insect crawls on to the floor. Some dough is then applied to this and it is
carried home and let loose in the house. The flour under the brass plate is
examined, and it is said that they usually see the footprints of a person or
animal, indicating the corporeal entity in which the deceased soul has found
a resting-place. During the period of mourning members of the bereaved
family do not follow their ordinary business, nor eat flesh, sweets or other
delicate food. They may not make offerings to their deities nor touch any
persons outside the family, nor wear head-cloths or shoes. In the eastern
Districts the principal deities of the Lohārs are Dūlha Deo and Somlai or
Devi, the former being represented by a knife set in the ground inside the
house, and the latter by the painting of a woman on the wall. Both deities are
kept in the cooking-room, and here the head of the family offers to them rice
soaked in milk, with sandal-paste, flowers, vermilion and lamp-black. He
burns some melted butter in an earthen lamp and places incense upon it. If a
man has been affected by the evil eye an exorcist will place some salt on his
hand and burn it, muttering spells, and the evil influence is removed. They
believe that a spell can be cast on a man by giving him to eat the bones of an
owl, when he will become an idiot.

5. Occupation

Page 165

In the rural area of the Province the Lohār is still a village menial, making
and mending the iron implements of agriculture, such as the ploughshare,
axe, sickle, goad and other articles. For doing this he is paid in Saugor a
yearly contribution of twenty pounds of grain per plough of land6 held by
each cultivator, together with a handful of grain at sowing-time and a sheaf
at harvest from both the autumn and spring crops. In Wardha he gets fifty
pounds of grain per plough of four bullocks or forty acres. For making new
implements the Lohār is sometimes paid separately and is always supplied
with the iron and charcoal. The hand-smelting iron industry has practically
died out in the Province and the imported metal is used for nearly all
purposes. The village Lohārs are usually very poor, their income seldom
exceeding that of an unskilled labourer. In the towns, owing to the rapid
extension of milling and factory industries, blacksmiths readily find
employment and some of them earn very high wages. In the manufacture of
cutlery, nails and other articles the capital is often found by a Bhātia or
Bohra merchant, who acts as the capitalist and employs the Lohārs as his
workmen. The women help their husbands by blowing the bellows and
dragging the hot iron from the furnace, while the men wield the hammer.
The Panchāls of Berār are described as a wandering caste of smiths, living in
grass mat-huts and using as fuel the roots of thorn bushes, which they batter
out of the ground with the back of a short-handled axe peculiar to
themselves. They move from place to place with buffaloes, donkeys and
ponies to carry their kit.7 Another class of wandering smiths, the Ghisāris,
are described by Mr. Crooke as follows: “Occasional camps of these most
interesting people are to be met with in the Districts of the Meerut Division.
They wander about with small carts and pack-animals, and, being more
expert than the ordinary village Lohār, their services are in demand for the
making of tools for carpenters, weavers and other craftsmen. They are
known in the Punjab as Gādiya or those who have carts (gādi, gāri). Sir D.
Ibbetson8 says that they come up from Rājputāna and the North-Western
Provinces, but their real country is the Deccan. In the Punjab they travel
about with their families and implements in carts from village to village,
doing the finer kinds of iron-work, which are beyond the capacity of the
village artisan. In the Deccan9 this class of wandering blacksmiths are called
Saiqalgar, or knife-grinders, or Ghisāra, or grinders (Hindi, ghisāna ‘to
rub’). They wander about grinding knives and tools.”

Page 166

1 Tribes and Castes of the N.W.P. and Oudh, art. Lohār.

2 Dowson, Classical Dictionary, s.v.
3 In Uriya the term, Ghantrabela means a person who has illicit intercourse with another. The
Ghantra Lohārs are thus probably of bastard origin, like the groups known as half-castes and
others which are frequently found.

4 Punjab Census Report (1881), para. 624. (Ibbetson.)
5 Tribes and Castes of Bengal, art. Lohār
6 About 15 acres.
7 Berār Census Report, 1881 (Kitts).

8 Punjāb Ethnography, para. 624.
9 Bombay Gazetteer, xvi. 82.

Page 167

Lorha
Lorha.1—A small caste of cultivators in the Hoshangābād and Nimār
Districts, whose distinctive occupation is to grow san-hemp (Crotalaria
juncea) and to make sacking and gunny-bags from the fibre. A very strong
prejudice against this crop exists among the Hindus, and those who grow it
are usually cut off from their parent caste and become a separate community.
Thus we have the castes known as Kumrāwat, Patbīna and Dāngur in
different parts of the Province, who are probably offshoots from the Kurmis
and Kunbis, but now rank below them because they grow this crop; and in
the Kurmi caste itself a subcaste of Santora (hemp-picking) Kurmis has
grown up. In Bilāspur the Pathāria Kurmis will grow san-hemp and ret it,
but will not spin or weave the fibre; while the Athāria Kurmis will not grow
the crop, but will spin the fibre and make sacking. The Saugor Kewats grow
this fibre, and here Brāhmans and other high castes will not take water from
Kewats, though in the eastern Districts they will do so. The Narsinghpur
Mallāhs, a branch of the Kewats, have also adopted the cultivation of san-
hemp as a regular profession. The basis of the prejudice against the san-
hemp plant is not altogether clear. The Lorhas themselves say that they are
looked down upon because they use wheat-starch (lapsi) for smoothing the
fibre, and that their name is somehow derived from this fact. But the
explanation does not seem satisfactory. Many of the country people appear
to think that there is something uncanny about the plant because it grows so
quickly, and they say that on one occasion a cultivator went out to sow hemp
in the morning, and his wife was very late in bringing his dinner to the field.
He grew hungry and angry, and at last the shoots of the hemp-seeds which
he had sown in the morning began to appear above the ground. At this he
was so enraged that when his wife finally came he said she had kept him
waiting so long that the crop had come up in the meantime, and murdered
her. Since then the Hindus have been forbidden to grow san-hemp lest they
should lose their tempers in the same manner. This story makes a somewhat
excessive demand on the hearer’s credulity. One probable cause of the taboo
seems to be that the process of soaking and retting the stalks of the plant

Page 168

pollutes the water, and if carried on in a tank or in the pools of a stream
might destroy the village supply of drinking-water. In former times it may
have been thought that the desecration of their sacred element was an insult
to the deities of rivers and streams, which would bring down retribution on
the offender. It is also the case that the proper separation of the fibres
requires a considerable degree of dexterity which can only be acquired by
practice. Owing to the recent increase in the price of the fibre and the large
profits which can now be obtained from hemp cultivation, the prejudice
against it is gradually breaking down, and the Gonds, Korkus and lower
Hindu castes have waived their religious scruples and are glad to turn an
honest penny by sowing hemp either on their own account or for hire. Other
partially tabooed crops are turmeric and āl or Indian madder (Morinda
citrifolia), while onions and garlic are generally eschewed by Hindu
cultivators. For growing turmeric and āl special subcastes have been formed,
as the Alia Kunbis and the Hardia Mālis and Kāchhis (from haldi, turmeric),
just as in the case of san-hemp. The objection to these two crops is believed
to lie in the fact that the roots which yield the commercial product have to be
boiled, and by this process a number of insects contained in them are
destroyed. But the preparation of the hemp-fibre does not seem to involve
any such sacrifice of insect life. The Lorhas appear to be a mixed group,
with a certain amount of Rājpūt blood in them, perhaps an offshoot of the
Kirārs, with whose social customs their own are said to be identical.
According to another account, they are a lower or illegitimate branch of the
Lodha caste of cultivators, of whose name their own is said to be a
corruption. The Nimār Gūjars have a subcaste named Lorha, and the Lorhas
of Hoshangābād may be connected with these. They live in the Seoni and
Harda tahsīls of Hoshangābād, the san-hemp crop being a favourite one in
villages adjoining the forests, because it is not subject to the depredations of
wild animals. Cultivators are often glad to sublet their fields for the purpose
of having a crop of hemp grown upon them, because the stalks are left for
manure and fertilise the ground. String and sacking are also made from the
hemp-fibre by vagrant and criminal castes like the Banjāras and Bhāmtas,
who formerly required the bags for carrying their goods and possessions
about with them.

Page 169

1 This article is partly based on papers by Mr. P.B. Telang, Munsiff Seoni-Mālwa, and Mr. Wāman
Rao Mandloi, nāib-tahsīldār, Harda.

Page 170

Mahār
List of Paragraphs

1. General Notice.
2. Length of residence in the Central Provinces
3. Legend of origin
4. Sub-castes
5. Exogamous groups and marriage customs
6. Funeral rites
7. Childbirth
8. Names
9. Religion
10. Adoption of foreign religions
11. Superstitions
12. Social rules
13. Social subjection
14. Their position improving
15. Occupation

1. General Notice.

Mahār, Mehra, Dhed.—The impure caste of menials, labourers and village
watchmen of the Marātha country, corresponding to the Chamārs and Koris
of northern India. They numbered nearly 1,200,000 persons in the combined
Province in 1911, and are most numerous in the Nāgpur, Bhandāra, Chānda
and Wardha Districts of the Central Provinces, while considerable colonies
are also found in Bālāghāt, Chhindwāra and Betūl. Their distribution thus
follows largely that of the Marāthi language and the castes speaking it. Berār

Page 171

contained 400,000, distributed over the four Districts. In the whole Province
this caste is third in point of numerical strength. In India the Mahārs number
about three million persons, of whom a half belong to Bombay. I am not
aware of any accepted derivation for the word Mahār, but the balance of
opinion seems to be that the native name of Bombay, Mahārāshtra, is derived
from that of the caste, as suggested by Wilson. Another derivation which
holds it to be a corruption of Maha Rāstrakūta, and to be so called after the
Rāshtrakūta Rājpūt dynasty of the eighth and ninth centuries, seems less
probable because countries are very seldom named after ruling dynasties.1
Whereas in support of Mahārāshtra as ‘The country of the Mahārs,’ we have
Gujarāshtra or Gujarāt, ‘the country of the Gūjars,’ and Saurāshtra or Surat,
‘the country of the Sauras.’ According to Platts’ Dictionary, however,
Mahārāshtra means ‘the great country,’ and this is what the Marātha
Brāhmans themselves say. Mehra appears to be a variant of the name current
in the Hindustāni Districts, while Dheda, or Dhada, is said to be a corruption
of Dharadas or billmen.2 In the Punjab it is said to be a general term of
contempt meaning ‘Any low fellow.’3

Wilson considers the Mahārs to be an aboriginal or pre-Aryan tribe, and all
that is known of the caste seems to point to the correctness of this
hypothesis. In the Bombay Gazetteer the writer of the interesting Gujarāt
volume suggests that the Mahārs are fallen Rājpūts; but there seems little to
support this opinion except their appearance and countenance, which is of
the Hindu rather than the Dravidian type. In Gujarāt they have also some
Rājpūt surnames, as Chauhān, Panwār, Rāthor, Solanki and so on, but these
may have been adopted by imitation or may indicate a mixture of Rājpūt
blood. Again, the Mahārs of Gujarāt are the farmservants and serfs of the
Kunbis. “Each family is closely connected with the house of some
landholder or pattidār (sharer). For his master he brings in loads from the
fields and cleans out the stable, receiving in return daily allowances of
buttermilk and the carcases of any cattle that die. This connection seems to
show traces of a form of slavery. Rich pattidārs have always a certain
number of Dheda families whom they speak of as ours (hamāra) and when a
man dies he distributes along with his lands a certain number of Dheda
families to each of his sons. An old tradition among Dhedas points to some
relation between the Kunbis and Dhedas. Two brothers, Leva and Deva,

Page 172

were the ancestors, the former of the Kunbis, the latter of the Dhedas.” 4
Such a relation as this in Hindu society would imply that many Mahār
women held the position of concubines to their Kunbi masters, and would
therefore account for the resemblance of the Mahār to Hindus rather than the
forest tribes. But if this is to be regarded as evidence of Rājpūt descent, a
similar claim would have to be allowed to many of the Chamārs and
sweepers. Others of the lowest castes also have Rājpūt sept names, as the
Pārdhis and Bhīls; but the fact can at most be taken, I venture to think, to
indicate a connection of the ‘Droit de Seigneur’ type. On the other hand, the
Mahārs occupy the debased and impure position which was the lot of those
non-Aryan tribes who became subject to the Hindus and lived in their
villages; they eat the flesh of dead cattle and this and other customs appear
to point decisively to a non-Aryan origin.

2. Length of residence in the Central Provinces

Several circumstances indicate that the Mahār is recognised as the oldest
resident of the plain country of Berār and Nāgpur. In Berār he is a village
servant and is the referee on village boundaries and customs, a position
implying that his knowledge of them is the most ancient. At the Holi festival
the fire of the Mahārs is kindled first and that of the Kunbis is set alight from
it. The Kāmdār Mahār, who acts as village watchman, also has the right of
bringing the toran or rope of leaves which is placed on the marriage-shed of
the Kunbis; and for this he receives a present of three annas. In Bhandrā the
Telis, Lohārs, Dhimārs and several other castes employ a Mahār Mohturia or
wise man to fix the date of their weddings. And most curious of all, when the
Panwār Rājpūts of this tract celebrate the festival of Nārāyan Deo, they call a
Mahār to their house and make him the first partaker of the feast before
beginning to eat themselves. Again in Berār5 the Mahār officiates at the
killing of the buffalo on Dasahra. On the day before the festival the chief
Mahār of the village and his wife with their garments knotted together bring
some earth from the jungle and fashioning two images set one on a clay
elephant and the other on a clay bullock. The images are placed on a small

Page 173

platform outside the village site and worshipped; a young he-buffalo is
bathed and brought before the images as though for the same object. The
Patel wounds the buffalo in the nose with a sword and it is then marched
through the village. In the evening it is killed by the head Mahār, buried in
the customary spot, and any evil that might happen during the coming year is
thus deprecated and, it is hoped, averted. The claim to take the leading part
in this ceremony is the occasion of many a quarrel and an occasional affray
or riot Such customs tend to show that the Mahārs were the earliest
immigrants from Bombay into the Berār and Nāgpur plain, excluding of
course the Gonds and other tribes, who have practically been ousted from
this tract. And if it is supposed that the Panwārs came here in the tenth
century, as seems not improbable,6 the Mahārs, whom the Panwārs recognise
as older residents than themselves, must have been earlier still, and were
probably numbered among the subjects of the old Hindu kingdoms of
Bhāndak and Nagardhan.

3. Legend of origin

The Mahārs say they are descended from Mahāmuni, who was a foundling
picked up by the goddess Pārvati on the banks of the Ganges. At this time
beef had not become a forbidden food; and when the divine cow, Tripād
Gayatri, died, the gods determined to cook and eat her body and Mahāmuni
was set to watch the pot boiling. He was as inattentive as King Alfred, and a
piece of flesh fell out of the pot. Not wishing to return the dirty piece to the
pot Mahāmuni ate it; but the gods discovered the delinquency, and doomed
him and his descendants to live on the flesh of dead cows.7

4. Sub-castes

Page 174

The caste have a number of subdivisions, generally of a local or territorial
type, as Daharia, the residents of Dāhar or the Jubbulpore country, Baonia
(52) of Berār, Nemādya or from Nimar, Khāndeshi from Khāndesh, and so
on; the Katia group are probably derived from that caste, Katīa meaning a
spinner; the Bārkias are another group whose name is supposed to mean
spinners of fine thread; while the Lonārias are salt-makers. The highest
division are the Somvansis or children of the moon; these claim to have
taken part with the Pāndavas against the Kauravas in the war of the
Mahābhārata, and subsequently to have settled in Mahārāshtra.8 But the
Somvansi Mahārs consent to groom horses, which the Baone and Kosaria
subcastes will not do. Baone and Somvansi Mahārs will take food together,
but will not intermarry. The Ladwān subcaste are supposed to be the
offspring of kept women of the Somvansi Mahārs; and in Wardha the
Dhārmik group are also the descendants of illicit unions and their name is
satirical, meaning ‘virtuous.’ As has been seen, the caste have a subdivision
named Katia, which is the name of a separate Hindustāni caste; and other
subcastes have names belonging to northern India, as the Mahobia, from
Mahoba in the United Provinces, the Kosaria or those from Chhattīsgarh,
and the Kanaujia from Kanauj. This may perhaps be taken to indicate that
bodies of the Kori and Katia weaving castes of northern India have been
amalgamated with the Mahārs in Districts where they have come together
along the Satpūra Hills and Nerbudda Valley.

5. Exogamous groups and marriage customs

The caste have also a large number of exogamous groups, the names of
which are usually derived from plants, animals, and natural objects. A few
may be given as examples out of fifty-seven recorded in the Central
Provinces, though this is far from representing the real total; all the common
animals have septs named after them, as the tiger, cobra, tortoise, peacock,
jackal, lizard, elephant, lark, scorpion, calf, and so on; while more curious
names are—Darpan, a mirror; Khānda Phari, sword and shield; Undrimāria,
a rat-killer; Aglāvi, an incendiary; Andhāre, a blind man; Kutramāria, a dog-

Page 175

killer; Kodu Dūdh, sour milk; Khobragāde, cocoanut-kernel; Bhājikhai, a
vegetable eater, and so on.

A man must not marry in his own sept, but may take a wife from his
mother’s or grandmother’s. A sister’s son may marry a brother’s daughter,
but not vice versa. A girl who is seduced before marriage by a man of her
own caste or any higher one can be married as if she were a widow, but if
she has a child she must first get some other family to take it off her hands.
The custom of Lamjhana or serving for a wife is recognised, and the
expectant bridegroom will live with his father-in-law and work for him for a
period varying from one to five years. The marriage ceremony follows the
customary Hindustāni or Marātha ritual9 as the case may be. In Wardha the
right foot of the bridegroom and the left one of the bride are placed together
in a new basket, while they stand one on each side of the threshold. They
throw five handfuls of coloured rice over each other, and each time, as he
throws, the bridegroom presses his toe on the bride’s foot; at the end he
catches the girl by the finger and the marriage is complete. In the Central
Provinces the Mohtūria or caste priest officiates at weddings, but in Berār,
Mr. Kitts states10 the caste employ the Brāhman Joshi or village priest. But
as he will not come to their house they hold the wedding on the day that one
takes place among the higher castes, and when the priest gives the signal the
dividing cloth (Antarpat) between the couple is withdrawn, and the garments
of the bride and bridegroom are knotted, while the bystanders clap their
hands and pelt the couple with coloured grain. As the priest frequently takes
up his position on the roof of the house for a wedding it is easy for the
Mahārs to see him. In Mandla some of the lower class of Brāhmans will
officiate at the weddings of Mahārs. In Chhindwāra the Mahārs seat the
bride and bridegroom in the frame of a loom for the ceremony, and they
worship the hide of a cow or bullock filled with water. They drink together
ceremoniously, a pot of liquor being placed on a folded cloth and all the
guests sitting round it in a circle. An elder man then lays a new piece of cloth
on the pot and worships it. He takes a cup of the liquor himself and hands
round a cupful to every person present.

In Mandla at a wedding the barber comes and cuts the bride’s nails, and the
cuttings are rolled up in dough and placed in a little earthen pot beside the

Page 176

marriage-post. The bridegroom’s nails and hair are similarly cut in his own
house and placed in another vessel. A month or two after the wedding the
two little pots are taken out and thrown into the Nerbudda. A wedding costs
the bridegroom’s party about Rs. 40 or Rs. 50 and the bride’s about Rs. 25.
They have no going-away ceremony, but the occasion of a girl’s coming to
maturity is known as Bolāwan. She is kept apart for six days and given new
clothes, and the caste-people are invited to a meal. When a woman’s
husband dies the barber breaks her bangles, and her anklets are taken off and
given to him as his perquisite. Her brother-in-law or other relative gives her
a new white cloth, and she wears this at first, and afterwards white or
coloured clothes at her pleasure. Her hair is not cut, and she may wear
patelas or flat metal bangles on the forearm and armlets above the elbow, but
not other ornaments. A widow is under no obligation to marry her first
husband’s younger brother; when she marries a stranger he usually pays a
sum of about Rs. 30 to her parents. When the price has been paid the couple
exchange a ring and a bangle respectively in token of the agreement. When
the woman is proceeding to her second husband’s house, her old clothes,
necklace and bangles are thrown into a river or stream and she is given new
ones to wear. This is done to lay the first husband’s spirit, which may be
supposed to hang about the clothes she wore as his wife, and when they are
thrown away or buried the exorcist mutters spells over them in order to lay
the spirit. No music is allowed at the marriage of a widow except the
crooked trumpet called singāra. A bachelor who marries a widow must first
go through a mock ceremony with a cotton-plant, a sword or a ring. Divorce
must be effected before the caste panchāyat or committee, and if a divorced
woman marries again, her first husband performs funeral and mourning
ceremonies as if she were dead. In Gujarāt the practice is much more lax and
“divorce can be obtained almost to an indefinite extent. Before they finally
settle down to wedded life most couples have more than once changed their
partners.”11 But here also, before the change takes place, there must be a
formal divorce recognised by the caste.

6. Funeral rites

Page 177

The caste either burn or bury the dead and observe mourning for three
days,12 having their houses whitewashed and their faces shaved. On the tenth
day they give a feast to the caste-fellows. On the Akshaya Tritia 13 and the
30th day of Kunwār (September) they offer rice and cakes to the crows in
the names of their ancestors. In Berār Mr. Kitts writes:14 “If a Mahār’s child
has died, he will on the third day place bread on the grave; if an infant, milk;
if an adult, on the tenth day, with five pice in one hand and five betel-leaves
in the other, he goes into the river, dips himself five times and throws these
things away; he then places five lighted lamps on the tomb, and after these
simple ceremonies gets himself shaved as though he were an orthodox
Hindu.”

7. Childbirth

In Mandla the mother is secluded at childbirth in a separate house if one is
available, and if not they fence in a part of the veranda for her use with
bamboo screens. After the birth the mother must remain impure until the
barber comes and colours her toe-nails and draws a line round her feet with
red mahur powder. This is indispensable, and if the barber is not
immediately available she must wait until his services can be obtained.
When the navel-string drops it is buried in the place on which the mother sat
while giving birth, and when this has been done the purification may be
effected. The Dhobi is then called to wash the clothes of the household, and
their earthen pots are thrown away. The head of the newborn child is shaved
clean, as the birth-hair is considered to be impure, and the hair is wrapped up
in dough and thrown into a river.

8. Names

Page 178

A child is named on the seventh or twelfth day after its birth, the name being
chosen by the Mohtūria or caste headman. The ordinary Hindu names of
deities for men and sacred rivers or pious and faithful wives for women are
employed; instances of the latter being Ganga, Godāvari, Jamuna, Sīta,
Laxmi and Rādha. Opprobrious names are sometimes given to avert ill-luck,
as Damdya (purchased for eight cowries), Kauria (a cowrie), Bhikāria (a
beggar), Ghusia (from ghus, a mallet for stamping earth), Harchatt (refuse),
Akāli (born in famine-time), Langra (lame), Lula (having an arm useless); or
the name of another low caste is given, as Bhangi (sweeper), Domari (Dom
sweeper), Chamra (tanner), Basori (basket-maker). Not infrequently children
are named after the month or day when they were born, as Pusau, born in
Pus (December), Chaitu, born in Chait (March), Manglu (born on Tuesday),
Buddhi (born on Wednesday), Sukka (born on Friday), Sanīchra (born on
Saturday). One boy was called Mulua or ‘Sold’ (mol-dena). His mother had
no other children, so sold him for one pice (farthing) to a Gond woman.
After five or six months, as he did not get fat, his name was changed to
Jhuma or ‘lean,’ probably as an additional means of averting ill-luck.
Another boy was named Ghurka, from the noise he made when being
suckled. A child born in the absence of its father is called Sonwa, or one
born in an empty house.

9. Religion

The great body of the caste worship the ordinary deities Devi, Hanumān,
Dūlha Deo, and others, though of course they are not allowed to enter Hindu
temples. They principally observe the Holi and Dasahra festivals and the
days of the new and full moon. On the festival of Nāg-Panchmi they make
an image of a snake with flour and sugar and eat it. At the sacred Ambāla
tank at Rāmtek the Mahārs have a special bathing-ghāt set apart for them,
and they may enter the citadel and go as far as the lowest step leading up to
the temples; here they worship the god and think that he accepts their
offerings. They are thus permitted to traverse the outer enclosures of the
citadel, which are also sacred. In Wardha the Mahārs may not touch the

Page 179

shrines of Mahādeo, but must stand before them with their hands joined.
They may sometimes deposit offerings with their own hands on those of
Bhīmsen, originally a Gond god, and Māta Devi, the goddess of smallpox.

10. Adoption of foreign religions

In Berār and Bombay the Mahārs have some curious forms of belief. “Of the
confusion which obtains in the Mahār theogony the names of six of their
gods will afford a striking example. While some Mahārs worship Vithoba,
the god of Pandharpur, others revere Varuna’s twin sons, Meghoni and
Deghoni, and his four messengers, Gabriel, Azrael, Michael and Anādin, all
of whom they say hail from Pandharpur.”15 The names of archangels thus
mixed up with Hindu deities may most probably have been obtained from
the Muhammadans, as they include Azrael; but in Gujarāt their religion
appears to have been borrowed from Christianity. “The Karia Dhedas have
some rather remarkable beliefs. In the Satya Yug the Dhedas say they were
called Satyas; in the Dvāpar Yug they were called Meghas; in the Treta Yug,
Elias; and in the Kāli Yug, Dhedas. The name Elias came, they say, from a
prophet Elia, and of him their religious men have vague stories; some of
them especially about a famine that lasted for three years and a half, easily
fitting into the accounts of Elijah in the Jewish Scriptures. They have also
prophecies of a high future in store for their tribe. The king or leader of the
new era, Kuyām Rai by name, will marry a Dheda woman and will raise the
caste to the position of Brāhmans. They hold religious meetings or
ochhavas, and at these with great excitement sing songs full of hope of the
good things in store for them. When a man wishes to hold an ochhava he
invites the whole caste, and beginning about eight in the evening they often
spend the night in singing. Except perhaps for a few sweetmeats there is no
eating or drinking, and the excitement is altogether religious and musical.
The singers are chiefly religious Dhedas or Bhagats, and the people join in a
refrain ‘Avore Kuyām Rai Rāja’, ‘Oh! come Kuyām Rai, our king.’”16 It
seems that the attraction which outside faiths exercise on the Mahārs is the
hope held out of ameliorating the social degradation under which they

Page 180

labour, itself an outcome of the Hindu theory of caste. Hence they turn to
Islām, or to what is possibly a degraded version of the Christian story,
because these religions do not recognise caste, and hold out a promise to the
Mahār of equality with his co-religionists, and in the case of Christianity of a
recompense in the world to come for the sufferings which he has to endure
in this one. Similarly, the Mahārs are the warmest adherents of the
Muhammadan saint Sheikh Farīd, and flock to the fairs held in his honour at
Girar in Wardha and Partāpgarh in Bhandāra, where he is supposed to have
slain a couple of giants.17 In Berār18 also they revere Muhammadan tombs.
The remains of the Muhammadan fort and tank on Pimpardol hill in Jalgaon
tāluk are now one of the sacred places of the Mahārs, though to the
Muhammadans they have no religious associations. Even at present Mahārs
are inclined to adopt Islām, and a case was recently reported when a body of
twenty of them set out to do so, but turned back on being told that they
would not be admitted to the mosque.19 A large proportion of the Mahārs are
also adherents of the Kabīrpanthi sect, one of the main tenets of whose
founder was the abolition of caste. And it is from the same point of view that
Christianity appeals to them, enabling European missionaries to draw a large
number of converts from this caste. But even the Hindu attitude towards the
Mahārs is not one of unmixed intolerance. Once in three or four years in the
southern Districts, the Panwārs, Mahārs, Pankas and other castes celebrate
the worship of Nārāyan Deo or Vishnu, the officiating priest being a Mahār.
Members of all castes come to the Panwār’s house at night for the ceremony,
and a vessel of water is placed at the door in which they wash their feet and
hands as they enter; and when inside they are all considered to be equal, and
they sit in a line and eat the same food, and bind wreaths of flowers round
their heads. After the cock crows the equality of status is ended, and no one
who goes out of the house can enter again. At present also many educated
Brāhmans recognise fully the social evils resulting from the degraded
position of the Mahārs, and are doing their best to remove the caste
prejudices against them.

11. Superstitions

Page 181

They have various spells to cure a man possessed of an evil spirit, or stung
by a snake or scorpion, or likely to be in danger from tigers or wild bears;
and in the Morsi tāluk of Berār it is stated that they so greatly fear the effect
of an enemy writing their name on a piece of paper and tying it to a
sweeper’s broom that the threat to do this can be used with great effect by
their creditors.20 To drive out the evil eye they make a small human image of
powdered turmeric and throw it into boiled water, mentioning as they do so
the names of any persons whom they suspect of having cast the evil eye
upon them. Then the pot of water is taken out at midnight of a Wednesday or
a Sunday and placed upside down on some cross-roads with a shoe over it,
and the sufferer should be cured. Their belief about the sun and moon is that
an old woman had two sons who were invited by the gods to dinner. Before
they left she said to them that as they were going out there would be no one
to cook, so they must remember to bring back something for her. The elder
brother forgot what his mother had said and took nothing away with him; but
the younger remembered her and brought back something from the feast. So
when they came back the old woman cursed the elder brother and said that
as he had forgotten her he should be the sun and scorch and dry up all
vegetation with his beams; but the younger brother should be the moon and
make the world cool and pleasant at night. The story is so puerile that it is
only worth reproduction as a specimen of the level of a Mahār’s intelligence.
The belief in evil spirits appears to be on the decline, as a result of education
and accumulated experience. Mr. C. Brown states that in Malkāpur of Berār
the Mahārs say that there are no wandering spirits in the hills by night of
such a nature that people need fear them. There are only tiny pari or fairies,
small creatures in human form, but with the power of changing their
appearance, who do no harm to any one.

12. Social rules

When an outsider is to be received into the community all the hair on his
face is shaved, being wetted with the urine of a boy belonging to the group
to which he seeks admission. Mahārs will eat all kinds of food including the

Page 182

flesh of crocodiles and rats, but some of them abstain from beef. There is
nothing peculiar in their dress except that the men wear a black woollen
thread round their necks.21 The women may be recognised by their bold
carriage, the absence of nose-rings and the large irregular dabs of vermilion
on the forehead. Mahār women do not, as a rule, wear the choli or breast-
cloth. An unmarried girl does not put on vermilion nor draw her cloth over
her head. Women must be tattooed with dots on the face, representations of
scorpions, flowers and snakes on the arms and legs, and some dots to
represent flies on the hands. It is the custom for a girl’s father or mother or
father-in-law to have her tattooed in one place on the hand or arm
immediately on her marriage. Then when girls are sitting together they will
show this mark and say, ‘My mother or father-in-law had this done,’ as the
case may be. Afterwards if a woman so desires she gets herself tattooed on
her other limbs. If an unmarried girl or widow becomes with child by a man
of the Mahār caste or any higher one she is subjected after delivery to a
semblance of the purification by fire known as Agnikāsht. She is taken to the
bank of a river and there five stalks of juāri are placed round her and burnt.
Having fasted all day, at night she gives a feast to the caste-men and eats
with them. If she offends with a man of lower caste she is finally expelled.
Temporary exclusion from caste is imposed for taking food or drink from the
hands of a Māng or Chamār or for being imprisoned in jail, or on a Mahār
man if he lives with a woman of any higher caste; the penalty being the
shaving of a man’s face or cutting off a lock of a woman’s hair, together with
a feast to the caste. In the last case it is said that the man is not readmitted
until he has put the woman away. If a man touches a dead dog, cat, pony or
donkey, he has to be shaved and give a feast to the caste. And if a dog or cat
dies in his house, or a litter of puppies or kittens is born, the house is
considered to be defiled; all the earthen pots must be thrown away, the whole
house washed and cleaned and a caste feast given. The most solemn oath of
a Mahār is by a cat or dog and in Yeotmāl by a black dog.22 In Berār, the
same paper states, the pig is the only animal regarded as unclean, and they
must on no account touch it. This is probably owing to Muhammadan
influence. The worst social sin which a Mahār can commit is to get vermin
in a wound, which is known as Deogan or being smitten by God. While the
affliction continues he is quite ostracised, no one going to his house or
giving him food or water; and when it is cured the Mahārs of ten or twelve

Page 183

surrounding villages assemble and he must give a feast to the whole
community. The reason for this calamity being looked upon with such
peculiar abhorrence is obscure, but the feeling about it is general among
Hindus.

Weaving: sizing the warp

Page 184

13. Social subjection

The social position of the Mahārs is one of distressing degradation. Their
touch is considered to defile and they live in a quarter by themselves outside
the village. They usually have a separate well assigned to them from which
to draw water, and if the village has only one well the Mahārs and Hindus
take water from different sides of it. Mahār boys were not until recently
allowed to attend school with Hindu boys, and when they could not be
refused admission to Government schools, they were allotted a small corner
of the veranda and separately taught. When Dher boys were first received
into the Chānda High School a mutiny took place and the school was
boycotted for some time. The people say, ‘Mahār sarva jātīcha bāhar’ or
‘The Mahār is outside all castes.’ Having a bad name, they are also given
unwarrantably a bad character; and ‘Mahār jātīchā’ is a phrase used for a
man with no moral or kindly feelings. But in theory at least, as conforming
to Hinduism, they were supposed to be better than Muhammadans and other
unbelievers, as shown by the following story from the Rāsmāla:23 A
Muhammadan sovereign asked his Hindu minister which was the lowest
caste. The minister begged for leisure to consider his reply and, having
obtained it, went to where the Dhedas lived and said to them: “You have
given offence to the Pādishāh. It is his intention to deprive you of caste and
make you Muhammadans.” The Dhedas, in the greatest terror, pushed off in
a body to the sovereign’s palace, and standing at a respectful distance
shouted at the top of their lungs: “If we’ve offended your majesty, punish us
in some other way than that. Beat us, fine us, hang us if you like, but don’t
make us Muhammadans.” The Pādishāh smiled, and turning to his minister
who sat by him affecting to hear nothing, said, ‘So the lowest caste is that to
which I belong.’ But of course this cannot be said to represent the general
view of the position of Muhammadans in Hindu eyes; they, like the English,
are regarded as distinguished foreigners, who, if they consented to be
proselytised, would probably in time become Brāhmans or at least Rājpūts.
A repartee of a Mahār to a Brāhman abusing him is: The Brāhman, ‘Jāre

Page 185

Mahārya’ or ‘Avaunt, ye Mahār’; the Mahār, ‘Kona dīushi neīn tumchi
goburya’ or ‘Some day I shall carry cowdung cakes for you (at his funeral)’;
as in the Marātha Districts the Mahār is commonly engaged for carrying fuel
to the funeral pyre. Under native rule the Mahār was subjected to painful
degradations. He might not spit on the ground lest a Hindu should be
polluted by touching it with his foot, but had to hang an earthen pot round
his neck to hold his spittle.24 He was made to drag a thorny branch with him
to brush out his footsteps, and when a Brahman came by had to lie at a
distance on his face lest his shadow might fall on the Brāhman. In Gujarāt25
they were not allowed to tuck up the loin-cloth but had to trail it along the
ground. Even quite recently in Bombay a Mahār was not allowed to talk
loudly in the street while a well-to-do Brāhman or his wife was dining in one
of the houses. In the reign of Sidhrāj, the great Solanki Rāja of Gujarāt, the
Dheras were for a time at any rate freed from such disabilities by the
sacrifice of one of their number.26 The great tank at Anhilvāda Pātan in
Gujarāt had been built by the Ods (navvies), but Sidhrāj desired Jusma Odni,
one of their wives, and sought to possess her. But the Ods fled with her and
when he pursued her she plunged a dagger into her stomach, cursing Sidhrāj
and saying that his tank should never hold water. The Rāja, returning to
Anhilvada, found the tank dry, and asked his minister what should be done
that water might remain in the tank. The Pardhān, after consulting the
astrologers, said that if a man’s life were sacrificed the curse might be
removed. At that time the Dhers or outcastes were compelled to live at a
distance from the towns; they wore untwisted cotton round their heads and a
stag’s horn as a mark hanging from their waists so that people might be able
to avoid touching them. The Rāja commanded that a Dher named Māyo
should be beheaded in the tank that water might remain. Māyo died, singing
the praises of Vishnu, and the water after that began to remain in the tank. At
the time of his death Māyo had begged as a reward for his sacrifice that the
Dhers should not in future be compelled to live at a distance from the towns
nor wear a distinctive dress. The Rāja assented and these privileges were
afterwards permitted to the Dhers for the sake of Māyo.

Page 186

Winding thread

14. Their position improving

From the painful state of degradation described above the Mahārs are
gradually being rescued by the levelling and liberalising tendency of British
rule, which must be to these depressed classes an untold blessing. With the
right of acquiring property they have begun to assert themselves, and the
extension of railways more especially has a great effect in abolishing caste
distinctions. The Brāhman who cannot afford a second-class fare must either
not travel or take the risk of rubbing shoulders with a Mahār in a third-class
carriage, and if he chooses to consider himself defiled will have to go hungry
and thirsty until he gets the opportunity of bathing at his journey’s end. The
observance of the rules of impurity thus becomes so irksome that they are
gradually falling into abeyance.

Page 187

15. Occupation

The principal occupations of the Mahārs are the weaving of coarse country
cloth and general labour. They formerly spun their own yarn, and their
fabrics were preferred by the cultivators for their durability. But practically
all thread is now bought from the mills; and the weaving industry is also in a
depressed condition. Many Mahārs have now taken to working in the mills,
and earn better wages than they could at home. In Bombay a number of them
are employed as police-constables.27 They are usually the village watchmen
of the Marātha Districts, and in this capacity were remunerated by
contributions of grain from the tenants, the hides and flesh of animals dying
in the village, and plots of rent-free land. For these have now been
substituted in the Central Provinces a cash payment fixed by Government. In
Berār the corresponding official is known as the Kāmdār Mahār. Mr. Kitts
writes of him:28 As fourth balutedār on the village establishment the Mahār
holds a post of great importance to himself and convenience to the village.
To the patel (headman), patwāri and big men of the village, he acts often as a
personal servant and errand-runner; for a smaller cultivator he will also at
times carry a torch or act as escort. He had formerly to clean the horses of
travellers, and was also obliged, if required, to carry their baggage.29 For the
services which he thus renders as pāndhewār the Mahār receives from the
cultivators certain grain-dues. When the cut juāri is lying in the field the
Mahārs go round and beg for a measure of the ears (bhīk payāli). But the
regular payment is made when the grain has been threshed. Another duty
performed by the Mahār is the removal of the carcases of dead animals. The
flesh is eaten and the skin retained as wage for the work. The patel and his
relatives, however, usually claim to have the skins of their own animals
returned; and in some places where half the agriculturists of the village claim
kinship with the patel, the Mahārs feel and resent the loss. A third duty is the
opening of grain-pits, the noxious gas from which sometimes produces
asphyxia. For this the Mahārs receive the tainted grain. They also get the
clothes from a corpse which is laid on the pyre, and the pieces of the burnt

Page 188

wood which remain when the body has been consumed. Recent observations
in the Nāgpur country show that the position of the Mahārs is improving. In
Nāgpur it is stated:30 “Looked down upon as outcastes by the Hindus they
are hampered by no sense of dignity or family prejudice. They are fond of
drink, but are also hard workers. They turn their hands to anything and
everything, but the great majority are agricultural labourers. At present the
rural Mahār is in the background. If there is only one well in the village he
may not use it, but has to get his water where he can. His sons are consigned
to a corner in the village school, and the schoolmaster, if not superior to
caste prejudices, discourages their attendance. Nevertheless, Mahārs will not
remain for years downtrodden in this fashion, and are already pushing
themselves up from this state of degradation. In some places they have
combined to dig wells, and in Nāgpur have opened a school for members of
their own community. Occasionally a Mahār is the most prosperous man in
the village. Several of them are moneylenders in a small way, and a few are
mālguzārs.” Similarly in Bhandāra Mr. Napier writes that a new class of
small creditors has arisen from the Mahār caste. These people have given up
drinking, and lead an abstemious life, wishing to raise themselves in social
estimation. Twenty or more village kotwārs were found to be carrying on
moneylending transactions on a small scale, and in addition many of the
Mahārs in towns were exceedingly well off.

1 This derivation is also negatived by the fact that the name Mahāratta was known in the third
century B.C., or long before the Rāstrakūtas became prominent.
2 Bombay Gazetteer; Gujarāt Hindus, p. 338.

3 Ibbetson, Punjab Census Report (1881).
4 Bombay Gazetteer, l.c. text and footnote by R. v. J. S. Taylor.

5 Kitts’ Berār Census Report (1881), p. 143.
6 See article on Panwār Rājpūt.

7 Berār Census Report (1881), p. 144.
8 Kitts’ Berār Census Report p. 144.

9 Described in the articles on Kurmi and Kunbi.
10 Loc. cit.

Page 189

11 Bombay Gazetteer, Gujarāt Hindus, loc. cit.

12 In Berār for ten days—Kitts’ Berār Census Report, l.c.
13 3rd Baisākh (April) Sudi, commencement of agricultural year.

14 Berār Census Report, l.c.
15 Berār Census Report, l.c.

16 Bombay Gazetteer, Gujarat Hindus.
17 It was formerly suggested that the fact of the Mahars being the chief worshippers at the shrines of
Sheikh Farīd indicated that the places themselves had been previously held sacred, and had been
annexed by the Muhammadan priests; and the legend of the giant, who might represent the
demonolatry of the aboriginal faith, being slain by the saint might be a parable, so to say, expressing
this process. But in view of the way in which the Mehtars worship Musalmān saints, it seems quite
likely that the Mahārs might do so for the same reason, that is, because Islām partly frees them from
the utter degradation imposed by Hinduism. Both views may have some truth. As regards the legends
themselves, it is highly improbable that Sheikh Farid, a well-known saint of northern India, can ever
have been within several hundred miles of either of the places with which they connect him.

18 From Mr. C. Brown’s notes.
19 C.P. Police Gazette.

20 Kitts, l.c.
21 Ibidem.

22 Stated by Mr. C. Brown.
23 Vol. ii. p. 237.

24 Bombay Gazetteer, vol. xii. p. 175.
25 Rev. A. Taylor in Bombay Gazetteer, Gujarāt Hindus, p. 341 f.

26 The following passage is taken from Forbes, Rāsmāla, i. p. 112.
27 Bombay Gazetteer, vol. xi p. 73.

28 Bombay Gazetteer, vol. xi. p. 73.
29 Grant Duff; History of the Marāthas, vol. i. p. 24.

30 Nāgpur Settlement Report (1899), p. 29.

Page 190

Page 191

Mahli

1. Origin of the caste

Mahli, Mahili.1—A small caste of labourers, palanquin-bearers and workers
in bamboo belonging to Chota Nāgpur. In 1911 about 300 Mahlis were
returned from the Feudatory States in this tract. They are divided into five
subcastes: the Bānsphor-Mahli, who make baskets and do all kinds of
bamboo-work; the Pāhar-Mahli, basket-makers and cultivators; the
Sulunkhi, cultivators and labourers; the Tānti who carry litters; and the
Mahli-Munda, who belong to Lohardaga. Sir H. Risley states that a
comparison of the totemistic sections of the Mahlis given in the Appendix to
his Tribes and Castes with those of the Santāls seems to warrant the
conjecture that the main body of the caste are merely a branch of the Santāls.
Four or five septs, Hansda a wild goose, Hemron, Murmu the nilgai, Saren
or Sarihin, and perhaps Tudu or Turu are common to the two tribes. The
Mahlis are also closely connected with the Mundas. Seven septs of the main
body of the Mahlis, Dumriār the wild fig, Gundli a kind of grain, Kerketa a
bird, Mahukal a bird (long-tail), Tirki, Tunduār and Turu are also Munda
septs; and the three septs given of the Mahli-Munda subcaste, Bhuktuār,
Lāng Chenre, and Sānga are all found among the Mundas; while four septs,
Hansda a wild goose, Induār a kind of eel, as well as Kerketa and Tirki,
already mentioned, are common to the Mahlis and Turis who are also
recognised by Sir H. Risley as an offshoot of the Munda tribe with the same
occupation as the Mahlis, of making baskets.2 The Santāls and Mundas were
no doubt originally one tribe, and it seems that the Mahlis are derived from
both of them, and have become a separate caste owing to their having settled
in villages more or less of the open country, and worked as labourers,
palanquin-bearers and bamboo-workers much in the same manner as the

Page 192

Turis. Probably they work for hire for Hindus, and hence their status may
have fallen lower than that of the parent tribe, who remained in their own
villages in the jungles. Colonel Dalton notes3 that the gipsy Berias use
Mānjhi and Mahali as titles, and it is possible that some of the Mahlis may
have joined the Beria community.

2. Social customs

Only a very few points from Sir H. Risley’s account of the caste need be
recorded here, and for further details the reader may be referred to his article
in the Tribes and Castes of Bengal. A bride-price of Rs. 5 is customary, but it
varies according to the means of the parties. On the wedding day, before the
usual procession starts to escort the bridegroom to the bride’s house, he is
formally married to a mango tree, while the bride goes through the same
ceremony with a mahua. At the entrance to the bride’s house the bridegroom,
riding on the shoulders of some male relation and bearing on his head a
vessel of water, is received by the bride’s brother, equipped in similar
fashion, and the two cavaliers sprinkle one another with water. At the
wedding the bridegroom touches the bride’s forehead five times with
vermilion and presents her with an iron armlet. The remarriage of widows
and divorce are permitted. When a man divorces his wife he gives her a
rupee and takes away the iron armlet which was given her at her wedding.
The Mahlis will admit members of any higher caste into the community. The
candidate for admission must pay a small sum to the caste headman, and
give a feast to the Mahlis of the neighbourhood, at which he must eat a little
of the leavings of food left by each guest on his leaf-plate. After this
humiliating rite he could not, of course, be taken back into his own caste,
and is bound to remain a Mahli.

1 This article consists of extracts from Sir H. Risley’s account of the caste in the Tribes and Castes
of Bengal.

Page 193

2 See lists of exogamous septs of Mahli, Sandāl, Munda and Puri in Appendix to Tribes and Castes
cf Bengal.

3 Ethnology of Bengal, p. 326.

Page 194

Majhwār
List of Paragraphs

1. Origin of the tribe
2. The Mīrzāpur Majhwārs derived from the Gonds
3. Connection with the Kawars
4. Exogamy and totemism
5. Marriage customs.
6. Birth and funeral rites
7. Religious dance

1. Origin of the tribe

Majhwār, Mānjhi, Mājhia.1—A small mixed tribe who have apparently
originated from the Gonds, Mundas and Kawars. About 14,000 Majhwārs
were returned in 1911 from the Raigarh, Sargūja and Udaipur States. The
word Mānjhi means the headman of a tribal subdivision, being derived from
the Sanskrit madhya, or he who is in the centre.2 In Bengal Mānjhi has the
meaning of the steersman of a boat or a ferryman, and this may have been its
original application, as the steersman might well be he who sat in the
centre.3 When a tribal party makes an expedition by boat, the leader would
naturally occupy the position of steersman, and hence it is easy to see how
the term Mānjhi came to be applied to the leader or head of the clan and to
be retained as a title for general use. Sir H. Risley gives it as a title of the
Kewats or fishermen and many other castes and tribes in Bengal. But it is
also the name for a village headman among the Santāls, and whether this
meaning is derived from the prior signification of steersman or is of
independent origin is, uncertain. In Raigarh Mr. Hīra Lāl states that the

Page 195

Mānjhis or Mājhias are fishermen and are sometimes classed, with the
Kewats. They appear to be Kols who have taken to fishing and, being looked
down on by the other Kols on this account, took the name of Mājhia or
Mānjhi, which they now derive from Machh, a fish. “The appearance of the
Mājhias whom I saw and examined was typically aboriginal and their
language was a curious mixture of Mundāri, Santāl and Korwa, though they
stoutly repudiated connection with any of these tribes. They could count
only up to three in their own language, using the Santāl words mit, baria,
pia. Most of their terms for parts of the body were derived from Mundāri,
but they also used some Santāli and Korwa words. In their own language
they called themselves Hor, which means a man, and is the tribal name of
the Mundas.”

2. The Mīrzāpur Majhwārs derived from the Gonds

On the other hand the Majhwārs of Mīrzāpur, of whom Mr. Crooke gives a
detailed and interesting account, clearly appear to be derived from the
Gonds. They have five subdivisions, which they say are descended from the
five sons of their first Gond ancestor. These are Poiya, Tekām, Marai, Chika
and Oiku. Four of these names are those of Gond clans, and each of the five
subtribes is further divided into a number of exogamous septs, of which a
large proportion bear typical Gond names, as Markām, Netām, Tekām,
Mashām, Sindrām and so on. The Majhwārs of Mīrzāpur also, like the
Gonds, employ Pathāris or Pardhāns as their priests, and there can thus be no
doubt that they are mainly derived from the Gonds. They would appear to
have come to Mīrzāpur from Sargūja and the Vindhyan and Satpūra hills, as
they say that their ancestors ruled from the forts of Mandla, Garha in
Jubbulpore, Sārangarh, Raigarh and other places in the Central Provinces.4
They worship a deified Ahīr, whose legs were cut off in a fight with some
Rāja, since when he has become a troublesome ghost. “He now lives on the
Ahlor hill in Sargūja, where his petrified body may still be seen, and the
Mānjhis go there to worship him. His wife lives on the Jhoba hill in Sargūja.
Nobody but a Baiga dares to ascend the hill, and even the Rāja of Sargūja

Page 196

when he visits the neighbourhood sacrifices a black goat. Mānjhis believe
that if these two deities are duly propitiated they can give anything they
need.” The story makes it probable that the ancestors of these Mānjhis dwelt
in Sargūja. The Mānjhis of Mīrzāpur are not boatmen or fishermen and have
no traditions of having ever been so. They are a backward tribe and practise
shifting cultivation on burnt-out patches of forest. It is possible that they
may have abandoned their former aquatic profession on leaving the
neighbourhood of the rivers, or they may have simply adopted the name,
especially since it has the meaning of a village headman and is used as a title
by the Santāls and other castes and tribes. Similarly the term Munda, which
at first meant the headman of a Kol village, is now the common name for the
Kol tribe in Chota Nāgpur.

3. Connection with the Kawars

Again the Mānjhis appear to be connected with the Kawar tribe. Mr. Hīra
Lāl states that in Raigarh they will take food with Kewats, Gonds, Kawars
and Rāwats or Ahīrs, but they will not eat rice and pulse, the most important
and sacred food, with any outsiders except Kawars; and this they explain by
the statement that their ancestors and those of the Kawars were connected. In
Mirzāpur the Kaurai Ahirs will take food and water from the Majhwārs, and
these Ahīrs are not improbably derived from the Kawars.5 Here the
Majhwārs also hold an oath taken when touching a broadsword as most
binding, and the Kawars of the Central Provinces worship a sword as one of
their principal deities.6 Not improbably the Mānjhis may include some
Kewats, as this caste also use Mānjhi for a title; and Mānjhi is both a
subcaste and title of the Khairwārs. The general conclusion from the above
evidence appears to be that the caste is a very heterogeneous group whose
most important constituents come from the Gond, Munda, Santāl and Kawar
tribes. Whether the original bond of connection among the various people
who call themselves Mānjhi was the common occupation of boating and
fishing is a doubtful point.

Page 197

4. Exogamy and totemism

The Mānjhis of Sargūja, like those of Raigarh, appear to be of Munda and
Santāl rather than of Gond origin. They have no subdivisions, but a number
of totemistic septs. Those of the Bhainsa or buffalo sept are split into the
Lotan and Singhan subsepts, lotan meaning a place where buffaloes wallow
and singh a horn. The Lotan Bhainsa sept say that their ancestor was born in
a place where a buffalo had wallowed, and the Singhan Bhainsa that their
ancestor was born while his mother was holding the horn of a buffalo. These
septs consider the buffalo sacred and will not yoke it to a plough or cart,
though they will drink its milk. They think that if one of them killed a
buffalo their clan would become extinct. The Bāghani Majhwārs, named
after the bāgh or tiger, think that a tiger will not attack any member of their
sept unless he has committed an offence entailing temporary
excommunication from caste. Until this offence has been expiated his
relationship with the tiger as head of his sept is in abeyance and the tiger will
eat him as he would any other stranger. If a tiger meets a member of the sept
who is free from sin, he will run away. When the Bāghani sept hear that any
Majhwār has killed a tiger they purify their houses by washing them with
cowdung and water. Members of the Khoba or peg sept will not make a peg
or drive one into the ground. Those of the Dūmar7 or fig-tree sept say that
their first ancestor was born under this tree. They consider the tree to be
sacred and never eat its fruit, and worship it once a year. Members of the
sept named after the shiroti tree worship the tree every Sunday.

5. Marriage customs.

Page 198

Marriage within the sept is prohibited and for three generations between
persons related through females. Marriage is adult, but matches are arranged
by the parents of the parties. At betrothal the elders of the caste must be
regaled with cheora or parched rice and liquor. A bride-price of Rs. 10 is
paid, but a suitor who cannot afford this may do service to his father-in-law
for one or two years in lieu of it. At the wedding the bridegroom puts a
copper ring on the bride’s finger and marks her forehead with vermilion. The
couple walk seven times round the sacred post, and seven little heaps of rice
and pieces of turmeric are arranged so that they may touch one of them with
their big toes at each round. The bride’s mother and seven other women
place some rice in the skirts of their cloths and the bridegroom throws this
over his shoulder. After this he picks up the rice and distributes it to all the
women present, and the bride goes through the same ceremony. The rice is
no doubt an emblem of fertility, and its presentation to the women may
perhaps be expected to render them fertile.

6. Birth and funeral rites

On the birth of a child the navel-string is buried in front of the house. When
a man is at the point of death they place a little cooked rice and curds in his
mouth so that he may not go hungry to the other world, in view of the fact
that he has probably eaten very little during his illness. Some cotton and rice
are also placed near the head of the corpse in the grave so that he may have
food and clothing in the next world. Mourning is observed for five days, and
at the end of this period the mourners should have their hair cut, but if they
cannot get it done on this day, the rite may be performed on the same day in
the following year.

7. Religious dance

Page 199

The tribe worship Dūlha Deo, the bridegroom god, and also make offerings
to their ploughs at the time of eating the new rice and at the Holi and
Dasahra festivals. They dance the karma dance in the months of Asārh and
Kunwār or at the beginning and end of the rains. When the time has come
the Gaontia headman or the Baiga priest fetches a branch of the karma tree
from the forest and sets it up in his yard as a notice and invitation to the
village. After sunset all the people, men, women and children, assemble and
dance round the tree, to the accompaniment of a drum known as Māndar.
The dancing continues all night, and in the morning the host plucks up the
branch of the karma tree and consigns it to a stream, at the same time
regaling the dancers with rice, pulse and a goat. This dance is a religious rite
in honour of Karam Rāja, and is believed to keep sickness from the village
and bring it prosperity. The tribe eat flesh, but abstain from beef and pork.
Girls are tattooed on arrival at puberty with representations of the tulsi or
basil, four arrow-heads in the form of a cross, and the foot-ornament known
as pairi.

1 This article is based on papers by Mr. Hīra Lāl and Suraj Baksh Singh, Assistant Superintendent,
Udaipur State, with references to Mr. Crooke’s exhaustive article on the Majhwārs in his Tribes
and Castes.

2 Crooke, art Majhwār, para. 1.
3 Tribes and Castes of Bengal, art. Mānjhi.

4 Crooke, Tribes and Castes of Bengal, art. Mānjhi, para. 4.
5 Crooke, Tribes and Castes of Bengal, art. Mānjhi, para. 63.

6 Ibidem, para. 54.
7 Ficus glomerata.

Page 200

Page 201

Māl
Māl, Māle, Māler, Māl Pahāria.1—A tribe of the Rājmahal hills, who may
be an isolated branch of the Savars. In 1911 about 1700 Māls were returned
from the Chota Nāgpur Feudatory States recently transferred to the Central
Provinces. The customs of the Māls resemble those of the other hill tribes of
Chota Nāgpur. Sir H. Risley states that the average stature is low, the
complexion dark and the figure short and sturdy. The following particulars
are reproduced from Colonel Dalton’s account of the tribe:

“The hill lads and lasses are represented as forming very romantic
attachments, exhibiting the spectacle of real lovers ‘sighing like furnaces,’
and the cockney expression of ‘keeping company’ is peculiarly applicable to
their courtship. If separated only for an hour they are miserable, but there are
apparently few obstacles to the enjoyment of each other’s society, as they
work together, go to market together, eat together, and sleep together! But if
it be found that they have overstepped the prescribed limits of billing and
cooing, the elders declare them to be out of the pale, and the blood of
animals must be shed at their expense to wash away the indiscretion and
obtain their readmission into society.

“On the day fixed for a marriage the bridegroom with his relations proceeds
to the bride’s father’s house, where they are seated on cots and mats, and
after a repast the bride’s father takes his daughter’s hand and places it in that
of the bridegroom, and exhorts him to be loving and kind to the girl that he
thus makes over to him. The groom then with the little finger of his right
hand marks the girl on the forehead with vermilion, and then, linking the
same finger with the little finger of her right hand, he leads her away to his
own house.

“The god of hunting is called Autga, and at the close of every successful
expedition a thank-offering is made to him. This is the favourite pastime,
and one of the chief occupations of the Mālers, and they have their game

Page 202

laws, which are strictly enforced. If a man, losing an animal which he has
killed or wounded, seeks for assistance to find it, those who aid are entitled
to one-half of the animal when found. Another person accidentally coming
on dead or wounded game and appropriating it, is subjected to a severe fine.
The Mānjhi or headman of the village is entitled to a share of all game killed
by any of his people. Any one who kills a hunting dog is fined twelve
rupees. Certain parts of an animal are tabooed to females as food, and if they
infringe this law Autga is offended and game becomes scarce. When the
hunters are unsuccessful it is often assumed that this is the cause, and the
augur never fails to point out the transgressing female, who must provide a
propitiatory offering. The Mālers use poisoned arrows, and when they kill
game the flesh round the wound is cut off and thrown away as unfit for food.
Cats are under the protection of the game laws, and a person found guilty of
killing one is made to give a small quantity of salt to every child in the
village.

“I nowhere find any description of the dances and songs of the Pahārias. Mr.
Atkinson found the Mālers extremely reticent on the subject, and with
difficulty elicited that they had a dancing-place in every village, but it is only
when under the influence of God Bacchus that they indulge in the
amusement. All accounts agree in ascribing to the Pahārias an immoderate
devotion to strong drink, and Buchanan tells us that when they are dancing a
person goes round with a pitcher of the home-brew and, without
disarranging the performers, who are probably linked together by circling or
entwining arms, pours into the mouth of each, male and female, a refreshing
and invigorating draught. The beverage is the universal pachwai, that is,
fermented grain. The grain, either maize, rice or janera (Holcus sorghum), is
boiled and spread out on a mat to cool. It is then mixed with a ferment of
vegetables called takar, and kept in a large earthen vessel for some days;
warm water may at any time be mixed with it, and in a few hours it ferments
and is ready for use.”

When the attention of English officers was first drawn to them in 1770 the
Māles of the Rājmahal hills were a tribe of predatory freebooters, raiding
and terrorising the plain country from the foot of the hills to the Ganges. It
was Mr. Augustus Cleveland, Collector of Bhāgalpur, who reduced them to

Page 203

order by entering into engagements with the chiefs for the prevention and
punishment of offences among their own tribesmen, confirming them in
their estates and jurisdiction, and enrolling a corps of Māles, which became
the Bhāgalpur Hill Rangers, and was not disbanded till the Mutiny. Mr.
Cleveland died at the age of 29, having successfully demonstrated the
correct method of dealing with the wild forest tribes, and the Governor-
General in Council erected a tomb and inscription to his memory, which was
the original of that described by Mr. Kipling in The Tomb of his Ancestors,
though the character of the first John Chinn in the story was copied from
Outram.2

1 Based entirely on Colonel Dalton’s account in the Ethnology of Bengal, and Sir H. Risley’s in the
Tribes and Castes of Bengal.
2 See The Khāndesh Bhīl Corps, by Mr. A. H. A. Simcox, p. 62.

Page 204

Mala
Mala.—A low Telugu caste of labourers and cotton-weavers. They
numbered nearly 14,000 persons in the Central Provinces in 1911, belonging
mainly to the Chānda, Nāgpur, Jubbulpore, and Yeotmāl Districts, and the
Bastar State. The Marāthas commonly call them Telugu Dhers, but they
themselves prefer to be known as ‘Telangi Sadar Bhoi,’ which sounds a more
respectable designation. They are also known as Mannepuwār and Netkāni.
They are the Pariahs of the Telugu country, and are regarded as impure and
degraded. They may be distinguished by their manner of tying the head-cloth
more or less in a square shape, and by their loin-cloths, which are worn very
loose and not knotted. Those who worship Narsinghswāmi, the man-lion
incarnation of Vishnu, are called Namaddār, while the followers of Mahādeo
are known as Lingadārs. The former paint their foreheads with vertical lines
of sandal-paste, and the latter with horizontal ones. The Mālas were formerly
zealous partisans of the right-handed sect in Madras, and the description of
this curious system of faction given by the Abbé Dubois more than a century
ago may be reproduced:1

“Most castes belong either to the left-hand or right-hand faction. The former
comprises the Vaishyas or trading classes, the Panchālas or artisan classes
and some of the low Sūdra castes. It also contains the lowest caste, viz. the
Chaklas or leather-workers, who are looked upon as its chief support. To the
right-hand faction belong most of the higher castes of Sūdras. The Pariahs
(Mālas) are also its great support, as a proof of which they glory in the title
of Valangai Maugattar or Friends of the Right Hand. In the disputes and
conflicts which so often take place between the two factions it is always the
Pariahs who make the most disturbance and do the most damage. The
Brāhmans, Rājas and several classes of Sūdras are content to remain neutral
and take no part in these quarrels. The opposition between the two factions
arises from certain exclusive privileges to which both lay claim. But as these
alleged privileges are nowhere clearly defined and recognised, they result in
confusion and uncertainty, and are with difficulty capable of settlement.

Page 205

When one faction trespasses on the so-called right of the other, tumults arise
which spread gradually over large tracts of territory, afford opportunity for
excesses of all kinds, and generally end in bloody conflicts. The Hindu,
ordinarily so timid and gentle in all other circumstances of life, seems to
change his nature completely on occasions like these. There is no danger that
he will not brave in maintaining what he calls his rights, and rather than
sacrifice a little of them he will expose himself without fear to the risk of
losing his life. The rights and privileges for which the Hindus are ready to
fight such sanguinary battles appear highly ridiculous, especially to a
European. Perhaps the sole cause of the contest is the right to wear slippers
or to ride through the streets in a palanquin or on horseback during marriage
festivals. Sometimes it is the privilege of being escorted on certain occasions
by armed retainers, sometimes that of having a trumpet sounded in front of a
procession, or of being accompanied by native musicians at public
ceremonies.” The writer of the Madras Census Report of 1871 states:2 “It is
curious that the females of two of the inferior castes should take different
sides to their husbands in these disputes. The wives of the agricultural
labourers side with the left hand, while their husbands help in fighting the
battles of the right, and the shoemakers’ wives also take the side opposed to
their husbands. During these festival disturbances, the ladies who hold
political views opposed to those of their husbands deny to the latter all the
privileges of the connubial state.” The same writer states that the right-hand
castes claimed the prerogative of riding on horseback in processions, of
appearing with standards bearing certain devices, and of erecting twelve
pillars to sustain their marriage booths; while the left-hand castes might not
have more than eleven pillars, nor use the same standards as the right. The
quarrels arising out of these small differences of opinion were so frequent
and serious in the seventeenth century that in the town of Madras it was
found necessary to mark the respective boundaries of the right- and left-hand
castes, and to forbid the right-hand castes in their processions from
occupying the streets of the left hand and vice versa. These disturbances
have gradually tended to disappear under the influence of education and
good government, and no instance of them is known to have occurred in the
Central Provinces. The division appears to have originated among the
members of the Sākta sect or the worshippers of Sakti as the female
principle of life in nature. Dr. L. D. Barnett writes:3—“The followers of the

Page 206

sect are of two schools. The ‘Walkers in the Right Way’ (Dakshināchāri) pay
a service of devotion to the deity in both male and female aspects, and
except in their more pronounced tendency to dwell upon the horrific aspects
of the deity (as Kāli, Durga, etc.), they differ little from ordinary Saivas and
Vaishnavas. The ‘Walkers in the Left Way’ (Vāmachāri), on the other hand,
concentrate their thought upon the godhead in its sexually maternal aspect,
and follow rites of senseless magic and—theoretically at least—promiscuous
debauchery.” As has been seen, the religious differences subsequently gave
rise to political factions.

1 Hindu Manners, Customs and Ceremonies, ed. 1897, pp. 25, 26.

2 Page 130.
3 Hinduism, in ‘Religions Ancient and Modern’ Series, p. 26.

Page 207

Māli
List of Paragraphs

1. General notice of the caste, and its social position
2. Caste legend
3. Flowers offered to the gods
4. Custom of wearing garlands
5. Sub-castes
6. Marriage
7. Widow-marriage, divorce and polygamy
8. Disposal of the dead
9. Religion
10. Occupation
11. Traits and character
12. Other functions of the Māli
13. Physical appearance

1. General notice of the caste, and its social position

Māli, Marār, Marāl.1—The functional caste of vegetable and flower-
gardeners. The terms Māli and Marār appear to be used indifferently for the
same caste, the former being more common in the west of the Province and
the latter in the eastern Satpūra Districts and the Chhattīsgarh plain. In the
Nerbudda valley and on the Vindhyan plateau the place of both Māli and
Marār is taken by the Kāchhi of Upper India.2 Marār appears to be a Marāthi
name, the original term, as pointed out by Mr. Hira Lāl, being Malāl, or one
who grows garden-crops in a field; but the caste is often called Māli in the
Marātha country and Marār in the Hindi Districts. The word Māli is derived

Page 208

from the Sanskrit māla, a garland. In 1911 the Mālis numbered nearly
360,000 persons in the present area of the Central Provinces, and 200,000 in
Berār. A German writer remarks of the caste3 that: “It cannot be considered
to be a very ancient one. Generally speaking, it may be said that flowers
have scarcely a place in the Veda. Wreaths of flowers, of course, are used as
decorations, but the separate flowers and their beauty are not yet
appreciated. That lesson was first learned later by the Hindus when
surrounded by another flora. Amongst the Homeric Greeks, too, in spite of
their extensive gardening and different flowers, not a trace of horticulture is
yet to be found.” It seems probable that the first Mālis were not included
among the regular cultivators of the village but were a lower group permitted
to take up the small waste plots of land adjoining the inhabited area and
fertilised by its drainage, and the sandy stretches in the beds of rivers, on
which they were able to raise the flowers required for offerings and such
vegetables as were known. They still hold a lower rank than the ordinary
cultivator. Sir D. Ibbetson writes4 of the gardening castes: “The group now
to be discussed very generally hold an inferior position among the
agricultural community and seldom if ever occupy the position of the
dominant tribe in any considerable tract of country. The cultivation of
vegetables is looked upon as degrading by the agricultural classes, why I
know not, unless it be that night-soil is generally used for their fertilisation;
and a Rājpūt would say: ‘What! Do you take me for an Arāin?’ if anything
was proposed which he considered derogatory.” But since most Mālis in the
Central Provinces strenuously object to using night-soil as a manure the
explanation that this practice has caused them to rank below the agricultural
castes does not seem sufficient. And if the use of night-soil were the real
circumstance which determined their social position, it seems certain that
Brāhmans would not take water from their hands as they do. Elsewhere Sir
D. Ibbetson remarks:5 “The Mālis and Sainis, like all vegetable growers,
occupy a very inferior position among the agricultural castes; but of the two
the Sainis are probably the higher, as they more often own land or even
whole villages, and are less generally mere market-gardeners than are the
Mālis.” Here is given what may perhaps be the true reason for the status of
the Māli caste as a whole. Again Sir C. Elliot wrote in the Hoshangābād
Settlement Report: “Garden crops are considered as a kind of fancy
agriculture and the true cultivator, the Kisān, looks on them with contempt

Page 209

as little peddling matters; what stirs his ambition is a fine large wheat-field
eighty or a hundred acres in extent, as flat as a billiard-table and as black as
a Gond.” Similarly Mr. Low6 states that in Bālāghāt the Panwārs, the
principal agricultural caste, look down on the Marārs as growers of petty
crops like sama and kutki. In Wardha the Dāngris, a small caste of melon
and vegetable growers, are an offshoot of the Kunbis; and they will take
food from the Kunbis, though these will not accept it from them, their social
status being thus distinctly lower than that of the parent caste. Again the
Kohlis of Bhandāra, who grow sugarcane with irrigation, are probably
derived from an aboriginal tribe, the Kols, and, though they possess a
number of villages, rank lower than the regular cultivating castes. It is also
worth noting that they do not admit tenant-right in their villages among their
own caste, and allot the sugarcane plots among the cultivators at pleasure.7
In Nimār the Mālis rank below the Kunbis and Gūjars, the good agricultural
castes, and it is said that they grow the crops which the cultivators proper do
not care to grow. The Kāchhis, the gardening caste of the northern Districts,
have a very low status, markedly inferior to that of the Lodhis and Kurmis
and little if any better than the menial Dhīmars. Similarly, as will be seen
later, the Marārs themselves have customs pointing clearly to a non-Aryan
origin. The Bhoyars of Betūl, who grow sugarcane, are probably of mixed
origin from Rājpūt fathers and mothers of the indigenous tribes; they eat
fowls and are much addicted to liquor and rank below the cultivating castes.
The explanation seems to be that the gardening castes are not considered as
landholders, and have not therefore the position which attaches to the
holding of land among all early agricultural peoples, and which in India
consisted in the status of a constituent member of the village community. So
far as ceremonial purity goes there is no difference between the Mālis and
the cultivating castes, as Brāhmans will take water from both. It may be
surmised that this privilege has been given to the Mālis because they grow
the flowers required for offerings to the gods, and sometimes officiate as
village priests and temple servants; and their occupation, though not on a
level with regular agriculture, is still respectable. But the fact that Brāhmans
will take water from them does not place the Mālis on an equality with the
cultivating castes, any more than it does the Nais (barbers) and Dhīmars
(watermen), the condemned menial servants of the cultivators, from whom
Brāhmans will also take water from motives of convenience.

Page 210

2. Caste legend

The Mālis have a Brāhmanical legend of the usual type indicating that their
hereditary calling was conferred and ratified by divine authority.8 This is to
the effect that the first Māli was a garland-maker attached to the household
of Rāja Kānsa of Mathura. One day he met with Krishna, and, on being
asked by him for a chaplet of flowers, at once gave it. On being told to fasten
it with string, he, for want of any other, took off his sacred thread and tied it,
on which Krishna most ungenerously rebuked him for his simplicity in
parting with his paīta, and announced that for the future his caste would be
ranked among the Sūdras.

The above story, combined with the derivation of Māli from māla, a garland,
makes it a plausible hypothesis that the calling of the first Mālis was to grow
flowers for the adornment of the gods, and especially for making the
garlands with which their images were and still are decorated. Thus the
Mālis were intimately connected with the gods and naturally became priests
of the village temples, in which capacity they are often employed. Mr.
Nesfield remarks of the Māli:9 “To Hindus of all ranks, including even the
Brāhmans, he acts as a priest of Mahādeo in places where no Gosain is to be
found, and lays the flower offerings on the lingam by which the deity is
symbolised. As the Māli is believed to have some influence with the god to
whose temple he is attached, none objects to his appropriating the fee which
is nominally presented to the god himself. In the worship of those village
godlings whom the Brāhmans disdain to recognise and whom the Gosain is
not permitted to honour the Māli is sometimes employed to present the
offering. He is thus the recognised hereditary priest of the lower and more
ignorant classes of the population.” In the Central Provinces Mālis are
commonly employed in the temples of Devi because goats are offered to the
goddess and hence the worship cannot be conducted by Brāhmans. They also
work as servants in Jain temples under the priest. They sweep the temple,

Page 211

clean the utensils, and do other menial business. This service, however, does
not affect their religion and they continue to be Hindus.

His services in providing flowers for the gods would be remunerated by
contributions of grain from the cultivators, the acceptance of which would
place the Māli below them in the rank of a village menial, though higher
than most of the class owing to the purity of his occupation. His status was
probably much the same as that of the Guraos or village priests of Mahādeo
in the Marātha country. And though he has now become a cultivator, his
position has not improved to the level of other cultivating castes for the
reasons already given. It was probably the necessity of regularly watering his
plants in order to obtain a longer and more constant supply of blooms which
first taught the Māli the uses of irrigation.

3. Flowers offered to the gods

Flowers are par excellence suited for the offerings and adornment of the
gods, and many Hindus have rose or other plants in their houses whose
flowers are destined to the household god. There is little reason to doubt that
this was the purpose for which cultivated flowers were first grown. The
marigold, lotus and champak are favourite religious flowers, while the tulsi
or basil is itself worshipped as the consort of Vishnu; in this case, however,
the scent is perhaps the more valued feature. In many Hindu households all
flowers brought into the house are offered to the household god before being
put to any other use. A Brāhman school-boy to whom I had given some
flowers to copy in drawing said that his mother had offered them to the god
Krishna before he used them. When faded or done with they should be
consigned to the sacred element, water, in any stream or river. The statues of
the gods are adorned with sculptured garlands or hold them in their hands. A
similar state of things prevailed in classical antiquity:

Who are these coming to the sacrifice?
To what green altar, O mysterious priest,

Page 212

Lead’st thou that heifer lowing at the skies,
And all her silken flanks with garlands drest?

And,

Fairer than these, though temple thou hast none,
Nor altar decked with flowers,
Nor virgin choir to make delicious moan
Upon the midnight hours.

M. Fustel de Coulanges describes the custom of wearing crowns or garlands
of flowers in ancient Rome and Greece as follows: “It is clear that the
communal feasts were religious ceremonies. Each guest had a crown on the
head; it was an ancient custom to crown oneself with leaves or flowers for
any solemn religious act.” “The more a man is adorned with flowers,” they
said, “the more pleasing he is to the gods; but they turn away from him who
wears no crown at his sacrifice.” And again, ‘A crown is the auspicious
herald which announces a prayer to the gods.’10

Among the Persians the flowers themselves are worshipped:11 “When a pure
Iranian sauntered through (the Victoria Gardens in Bombay) ... he would
stand awhile and meditate over every flower in his path, and always as in a
vision; and when at last the vision was fulfilled, and the ideal flower found,
he would spread his mat or carpet before it, and sit before it to the going
down of the sun, when he would arise and pray before it, and then refold his
mat or carpet and go home; and the next night, and night after night, until
that bright particular flower faded away, he would return to it, bringing his
friends with him in ever-increasing numbers, and sit and sing and play the
guitar or lute before it—and anon they all would arise together and pray
before it; and after prayers, still sit on, sipping sherbet and talking the most
hilarious and shocking scandal, late into the moonlight.”

Page 213

4. Custom of wearing garlands

From the custom of placing garlands on the gods as a mark of honour has no
doubt arisen that of garlanding guests. This is not confined to India but
obtained in Rome and probably in other countries. The word ‘chaplet’12
originally meant a garland or wreath to be worn on the head; and a garland
of leaves with four flowers at equal distances. Dryden says, ‘With chaplets
green upon their foreheads placed.’ The word māla originally meant a
garland, and subsequently a rosary or string of beads. From this it seems a
legitimate deduction that rosaries or strings of beads of a sacred wood were
substituted for flower-garlands as ornaments for the gods in view of their
more permanent nature. Having been thus sanctified they may have come to
be worn as a mark of holiness by saints or priests in imitation of the divine
images, this being a common or universal fashion of Hindu ascetics.
Subsequently they were found to serve as a useful means of counting the
continuous repetition of prayers, whence arose the phrase ‘telling one’s
beads.’ Like the Sanskrit māla, the English word rosary at first meant a
garland of roses and subsequently a string of beads, probably made from
rose-wood, on which prayers were counted. From this it may perhaps be
concluded that the images of the deities were decorated with garlands of
roses in Europe, and the development of the rosary was the same as the
Indian māla. If the rose was a sacred flower we can more easily understand
its importance as a badge in the Wars of the Roses.

5. Sub-castes

The caste has numerous endogamous groups, varying in different localities.
The Phūlmālis, who derive their name from their occupation of growing and

Page 214

selling flowers (phūl), usually rank as the highest. The Ghāse Mālis are the
only subcaste which will grow and prepare turmeric in Wardha; but they will
not sell milk or curds, an occupation to which the Phūlmālis, though the
highest subcaste, have no objection. In Chānda the Kosaria Mālis, who take
their name from Kosala, the classical designation of the Chhattīsgarh
country, are the sole growers of turmeric, while in Berār the Halde subcaste,
named after the plant, occupy the same position. The Kosaria or Kosre
subcaste abstain from liquor, and their women wear glass bangles only on
one hand and silver ones on the other. The objection entertained to the
cultivation of turmeric by Hindus generally is said to be based on the fact
that when the roots are boiled numbers of small insects are necessarily
destroyed; but the other Mālis relate that one of the ancestors of the caste
had a calf called Hardulia, and one day he said to his daughter, Haldi pakā,
or ‘Cook turmeric.’ But the daughter thought that he said ‘cook Hardulia,’ so
she killed and roasted the calf, and in consequence of this her father was
expelled from the caste, and his descendants are the Ghāse or Halde
subcaste. Ever since this happened the shape of a calf may be seen in the
flower of turmeric. This legend has, however, no real value and the meaning
of the superstition attaching to the plant is obscure. Though the growing of
turmeric is tabooed yet it is a sacred plant, and no Hindu girl, at least in the
Central Provinces, can be married without having turmeric powder rubbed
on her body. Mr. Gordon remarks in Indian Folk-Tales: “I was once speaking
to a Hindu gardener of the possibility of turmeric and garlic being stolen
from his garden. ‘These two vegetables are never stolen,’ he replied, ‘for we
Hindus believe that he who steals turmeric and garlic will appear with six
fingers in the next birth, and this deformity is always considered the birth-
mark of a thief.’” The Jīre Mālis are so named because they were formerly
the only subcaste who would grow cumin (jira), but this distinction no
longer exists as other Mālis, except perhaps the Phūlmālis, now grow it.
Other subcastes have territorial names, as Baone from Berār, Jaipuria,
Kanaujia, and so on. The caste have also exogamous septs or bargas, with
designations taken from villages, titles or nicknames or inanimate objects.

Page 215

Bride and bridegroom with marriage crowns

6. Marriage

Marriage is forbidden between members of the same sept and between first
and second cousins. Girls are generally betrothed in childhood and should be
married before maturity. In the Uriya country if no suitable husband can be
found for a girl she is sometimes made to go through the marriage ceremony
with a peg of mahua wood driven into the ground and covered over with a
cloth. She is then tied to a tree in the forest and any member of the caste may
go and release her, when she becomes his wife. The Marārs of Bālāghāt and
Bhandāra have the lamjhana form of marriage, in which the prospective
husband serves for his wife; this is a Dravidian custom and shows their
connection with the forest tribes. The marriage ceremony follows the
standard form prevalent in the locality. In Betūl the couple go seven times
round a slab on which a stone roller is placed, with their clothes knotted
together and holding in their hands a lighted lamp. The slab and roller may

Page 216

be the implements used in powdering turmeric. “Among the Marārs of
Bālāghāt13 the maternal uncle of the bridegroom goes to the village of the
bride and brings back with him the bridal party. The bride’s party do not at
once cross the boundary of the bridegroom’s village, but will stay outside it
for a few hours. Word is sent and the bridegroom’s party will bring out
cooked food, which they eat with the bride’s party. This done, they go to the
house of the bridegroom and the bride forthwith walks five times round a
pounding-stone. Next day turmeric is applied to the couple, and the caste
people are given a feast. The essential portion of the ceremony consists in
the rubbing of vermilion on the foreheads of the couple under the cover of a
cloth. The caste permit the practice of ralla-palla or exchanging sisters in
marriage. They are said to have a custom at weddings known as kondia,
according to which a young man of the bridegroom’s party, called the Sānd
or bull, is shut up in a house at night with all the women of the bride’s party;
he is at liberty to seize and have intercourse with any of them he can catch,
while they are allowed to beat him as much as they like. It is said that he
seldom has much cause to congratulate himself.” But the caste have now
become ashamed of this custom and it is being abandoned. In Chhattīsgarh
the Marārs, like other castes, have the forms of marriage known as the Badi
Shādi and Chhoti Shādi or great and small weddings. The former is an
elaborate form of marriage, taking place at the house of the bride. Those
who cannot afford the expense of this have a ‘Small Wedding’ at the house
of the bridegroom, at which the rites are curtailed and the expenditure
considerably reduced.

7. Widow-marriage, divorce and polygamy

Widow-marriage is permitted. The widower, accompanied by his relatives
and a horn-blower, goes to the house of the widow, and here a space is
plastered with cowdung and the couple sit on two wooden boards while their
clothes are knotted together. In Bālāghāt14 the bridegroom and bride bathe in
a tank and on emerging the widow throws away her old cloth and puts on a
new one. After this they walk five times round a spear planted in the ground.

Page 217

Divorce is permitted and can be effected by mutual consent of the parties.
Like other castes practising intensive cultivation the Mālis marry several
wives when they can afford it, in order to obtain the benefit of their labour in
the vegetable garden; a wife being more industrious and honest than a hired
labourer. But this practice results in large families and household
dissensions, leading to excessive subdivision of property, and wealthy
members of the caste are rare. The standard of sexual morality is low, and if
an unmarried girl goes wrong her family conceal the fact and sometimes try
to procure an abortion. If these efforts are unsuccessful a feast must be given
to the caste and a lock of the woman’s hair is cut off by way of punishment.
A young hard-working wife is never divorced, however bad her character
may be, but an old woman is sometimes abandoned for very little cause.

8. Disposal of the dead

The dead may be either buried or burnt; in the former case the corpse is laid
with the feet to the north. Mourning is observed only for three days and
propitiatory offerings are made to the spirits of the dead. If a man is killed by
a tiger his family make a wooden image of a tiger and worship it.

9. Religion

Devi is the principal deity of the Mālis. Weddings are celebrated before her
temple and large numbers of goats are sacrificed to the favourite goddess at
her festival in the month of Māgh (January). Many of the Marārs of Bālāghāt
are Kabīrpanthis and wear the necklace of that sect; but they appear none the
less to intermarry freely with their Hindu caste-fellows.15 After the birth of a
child it is stated that all the members of the sept to which the parents belong
remain impure for five days, and no one will take food or water from them.

Page 218

10. Occupation

The Māli combines the callings of a gardener and nurseryman. “In laying out
a flower-garden and in arranging beds,” Mr. Shearing remarks,16 “the Māli is
exceedingly expert. His powers in this respect are hardly surpassed by
gardeners in England. He lacks of course the excellent botanical knowledge
of many English gardeners, and also the peculiar skill displayed by them in
grafting and crossing, and in watching the habits of plants. Yet in
manipulative labour, especially when superintended by a European, he is,
though much slower in execution, almost if not quite equal to gardeners at
home.” They are excellent and very laborious cultivators, and show much
skill in intensive cultivation and the use of water. Mālis are the best
sugarcane growers of Betūl and their holdings usually pay a higher rental
than those of other castes. “In Bālāghāt,” Mr. Low remarks,17 “they are great
growers of tobacco and sugarcane, favouring the alluvial land on the banks
of rivers. They mostly irrigate by a dhekli or dipping lift, from temporary
wells or from water-holes in rivers. The pole of the lift has a weight at one
end and a kerosene tin suspended from the other. Another form of lift is a
hollowed tree trunk worked on a fulcrum, but this only raises the water a
foot or two. The Marārs do general cultivation as well; but as a class are not
considered skilled agriculturists. The proverb about their cultivating status
is:

Marār, Māli jote tāli
Tāli margayi, dhare kudāli

or, ‘The Marār yokes cows; if the cow dies he takes to the pickaxe’;
implying that he is not usually rich enough to keep bullocks.” The saying has
also a derogatory sense, as no good Hindu would yoke a cow to the plough.
Another form of lift used by the Kāchhis is the Persian wheel. In this two
wheels are fixed above the well or tank and long looped ropes pass over

Page 219

them and down into the well, between which a line of earthen pots is
secured. As the ropes move on the wheels the pots descend into the well, are
filled with water, brought up, and just after they reach the apex of the wheel
and turn to descend again, the water pours out to a hollow open tree-trunk,
from which a channel conveys it to the field. The wheel which turns the rope
is worked by a man pedalling, but he cannot do more than about three hours
a day. The common lift for gardens is the mot or bag made of the hide of a
bullock or buffalo. This is usually worked by a pair of bullocks moving
forwards down a slope to raise the mot from the well and backwards up the
slope to let it down when empty.

Bullocks drawing water with mot

11. Traits and character

“It is necessary,” the account continues, “for the Marār’s business for one
member at least of his family to go to market with his vegetables; and the
Marārin is a noteworthy feature in all bazārs, sitting with her basket or

Page 220

garment spread on the ground, full of white onions and garlic, purple brinjals
and scarlet chillies, with a few handfuls of strongly flavoured green stuff.
Whether from the publicity which it entails on their women or from
whatever cause, the Marārin does not bear the best of reputations for
chastity; and is usually considered rather a bold, coarse creature. The
distinctive feature of her attire is the way in which she ties up her body-cloth
so as to leave a tail sticking up behind; whence the proverb shouted after her
by rude little boys: ‘Jump from roof to roof, Monkey. Pull the tail of the
Marārin, Monkey,’ She also rejoices in a very large tikli or spangle on her
forehead and in a peculiar kind of angia (waistcoat). The caste are usually
considered rather clannish and morose. They live in communities by
themselves, and nearly always inhabit a separate hamlet of the village. The
Marārs of a certain place are said to have boycotted a village carpenter who
lost an axe belonging to one of their number, so that he had to leave the
neighbourhood for lack of custom.”

12. Other functions of the Māli

Many Mālis live in the towns and keep vegetable- or flower-gardens just
outside. They sell flowers, and the Māli girls are very good flower-sellers,
Major Sutherland says, being famous for their coquetry. A saying about them
is: “The crow among birds, the jackal among beasts, the barber among men
and the Mālin among women; all these are much too clever.” The Māli also
prepares the maur or marriage-crown, made from the leaves of the date-
palm, both for the bride and bridegroom at marriages. In return he gets a
present of a rupee, a piece of cloth and a day’s food. He also makes the
garlands which are used for presentation at entertainments, and supplies the
daily bunches of flowers which are required as offerings for Mahādeo. The
Māli keeps garlands for sale in the bazār, and when a well-to-do person
passes he goes up and puts a garland round his neck and expects a present of
a pice or two.

Page 221

13. Physical appearance

“Physically,” Mr. Low states, “the Marār is rather a poor-looking creature,
dark and undersized; but the women are often not bad looking, and dressed
up in their best at a wedding, rattling their castanets and waving light-
coloured silk handkerchiefs, give a very graceful dance. The caste are not as
a rule celebrated for their cleanliness. A polite way of addressing a Marār is
to call him Patel.”

1 This article is based principally on Mr. Low’s description of the Marārs in the Bālāghāt District
Gazetteer and on a paper by Major Sutherland, I.M.S.
2 C.P. Census Report (1891), para. 180.
3 Schröder, Prehistoric Antiquities, 121, quoted in Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, art. Māli.

4 Punjab Census Report (1881), para. 483.
5 Ibidem, para. 484.

6 Bālāghāt District Gazetteer, para. 59.
7 Mr. Napier’s Bhandara Settlement Report, quoted in article on Kohli.

8 Tribes and Castes of Bengal, art. Māli.
9 Brief View of the Caste System, p. 15.

10 La Cité antique, 21st ed., p. 181.
11 The Antiquity of Oriental Carpets, Sir G. Birdwood (Society of Arts, 6th November 1908).

12 The derivations of chaplet and rosary are taken from Ogilvy’s Dictionary.
13 Bālāghāt District Gazetteer (C.E. Low), para. 59.

14 Ibidem, loc. cit.
15 Bālāghāt District Gazetteer, para. 59.
16 Hindu Castes, vol. i. p. 327.
17 Bālāghāt District Gazetteer, loc. cit.

Page 222

Page 223

Mallāh
Mallāh, Malha.1—A small caste of boatmen and fishermen in the
Jubbulpore and Narsinghpur Districts, which numbered about 5000 persons
in 1911. It is scarcely correct to designate the Mallāhs as a distinct caste, as
in both these Districts it appears from inquiry that the term is synonymous
with Kewat. Apparently, however, the Mallāhs do form a separate
endogamous group, and owing to many of them having adopted the
profession of growing hemp, a crop which respectable Hindu castes usually
refuse to cultivate, it is probable that they would not be allowed to
intermarry with the Kewats of other Districts. In the United Provinces Mr.
Crooke states that the Mallāhs, though, as their Arabic name indicates, of
recent origin, have matured into a definite social group, including a number
of endogamous tribes. The term Mallāh has nothing to do with the Mulla or
Muhammadan priest among the frontier tribes, but comes from an Arabic
word meaning ‘to be salt,’ or, according to another derivation, ‘to move the
wings as a bird.’2 The Mallāhs of the Central Provinces are also, in spite of
their Arabic name, a purely Hindu caste. In Narsinghpur they say that their
original ancestor was one Bali or Balirām, who was a boatman and was so
strong that he could carry his boat to the river and back under his armpit. On
one occasion he ferried Rāma across the Ganges in Benāres, and it is said
that Rāma gave him a horse to show his gratitude; but Balirām was so
ignorant that he placed the bridle on the horse’s tail instead of the head. And
from this act of Balirām’s arose the custom of having the rudder of a boat at
the stern instead of at the bow. The Mallāhs in the Central Provinces appear
from their family names to be immigrants from Bundelkhand. Their customs
resemble those of lower-class Hindus. Girls are usually married under the
age of twelve years, and the remarriage of widows is permitted, while
divorce may be effected in the presence of the panchāyat or caste committee
by the husband and wife breaking a straw between them. They are scantily
clothed and are generally poor. A proverb about them says:

Jahān bethen Malao

Page 224

Tahan lage alao,

or, ‘Where Mallāhs sit, there is always a fire.’ This refers to their custom of
kindling fires on the river-bank to protect themselves from cold. In
Narsinghpur the Mallāhs have found a profitable opening in the cultivation
of hemp, a crop which other Hindu castes until recently tabooed on account
probably of the dirty nature of the process of cleaning out the fibre and the
pollution necessarily caused to the water-supply. They sow and cut hemp on
Sundays and Wednesdays, which are regarded as auspicious days. They also
grow melons, and will not enter a melon-field with their shoes on or allow a
woman during her periodical impurity to approach it. The Mallāhs are poor
and illiterate, but rank with Dhīmars and Kewats, and Brāhmans will take
water from their hands.

1 This article is based on papers by Mr. Shyāmācharan, B.A., B.L., Pleader, Narsinghpur, and
Pyāre Lāl Misra, Ethnographic clerk.

2 Crooke’s Tribes and Castes of the N. W. P. and Oudh, art. Mallāh.

Page 225

Māna
Māna.1—A Dravidian caste of cultivators and labourers belonging to the
Chānda District, from which they have spread to Nāgpur, Bhandāra and
Bālāghāt. In 1911 they numbered nearly 50,000 persons, of whom 34,000
belonged to Chānda. The origin of the caste is obscure. In the Chānda
Settlement Report of 1869 Major Lucie Smith wrote of them: “Tradition
asserts that prior to the Gond conquest the Mānas reigned over the country,
having their strongholds at Surajgarh in Ahiri and at Mānikgarh in the
Mānikgarh hills, now of Hyderābād, and that after a troubled rule of two
hundred years they fell before the Gonds. In appearance they are of the Gond
type, and are strongly and stoutly made; while in character they are hardy,
industrious and truthful. Many warlike traditions still linger among them,
and doubtless in days gone by they did their duty as good soldiers, but they
have long since hung up sword and shield and now rank among the best
cultivators of rice in Chānda.” Another local tradition states that a line of
Māna princes ruled at Wairāgarh. The names of three princes are
remembered: Kurumpruhoda, the founder of the line; Surjāt Badwāik, who
fortified Surjāgarh; and Gahilu, who built Mānikgarh. As regards the name
Mānikgarh, it may be mentioned that the tutelary deity of the Nāgvansi kings
of Bastar, who ruled there before the accession of the present Rāj-Gond
dynasty in the fourteenth century, was Mānikya Devi, and it is possible that
the chiefs of Wairāgarh were connected with the Bastar kings. Some of the
Mānas say that they, as well as the Gowāris, are offshoots of the Gond tribe;
and a local saying to the effect that ‘The Gond, the Gowāri and the Māna eat
boiled juāri or beans on leaf-plates’ shows that they are associated together
in the popular mind. Hislop states that the Ojhas, or soothsayers and
minstrels of the Gonds, have a subdivision of Māna Ojhas, who lay claim to
special sanctity, refusing to take food from any other caste.2 The Gonds have
a subdivision called Mannewār, and as wār is only a Telugu suffix for the
plural, the proper name Manne closely resembles Māna. It is shown in the
article on the Parja tribe that the Parjas were a class of Gonds or a tribe akin
to them, who were dominant in Bastar prior to the later immigration under

Page 226

the ancestors of the present Bastar dynasty. And the most plausible
hypothesis as to the past history of the Mānas is that they were also the
rulers of some tracts of Chānda, and were displaced like the Parjas by a
Gond invasion from the south.

In Bhandāra, where the Mānas hold land, it is related that in former times a
gigantic kite lived on the hill of Ghurkundi, near Sākoli, and devoured the
crops of the surrounding country by whole fields at a time. The king of
Chānda proclaimed that whoever killed the kite would be granted the
adjoining lands. A Māna shot the kite with an arrow and its remains were
taken to Chānda in eight carts, and as his reward he received the grant of a
zamīndāri. In appearance the Mānas, or at least some of them, are rather fine
men, nor do their complexion and features show more noticeable traces of
aboriginal descent than those of the local Hindus. But their neighbours in
Chānda and Bastar, the Māria Gonds, are also taller and of a better physical
type than the average Dravidian, so that their physical appearance need not
militate against the above hypothesis. They retained their taste for fighting
until within quite recent times, and in Kātol and other towns below the
Satpūra hills, Mānas were regularly enlisted as a town guard for repelling the
Pindāri raids. Their descendants still retain the ancestral matchlocks, and
several of them make good use of these as professional shikāris or hunters.
Many of them are employed as servants by landowners and moneylenders
for the collection of debts or the protection of crops, and others are
proprietors, cultivators and labourers, while a few even lend money on their
own account. Mānas hold three zamīndāri estates in Bhandāra and a few
villages in Chānda; here they are considered to be good cultivators, but have
the reputation as a caste of being very miserly, and though possessed of
plenty, living only on the poorest and coarsest food.3 The Māna women are
proverbial for the assistance which they render to their husbands in the work
of cultivation.

Owing to their general adoption of Marātha customs, the Mānas are now
commonly regarded as a caste and not a forest tribe, and this view may be
accepted. They have two subcastes, the Badwāik Mānas, or soldiers, and the
Khād Mānas, who live in the plains and are considered to be of impure
descent. Badwāik or ‘The Great Ones’ is a titular term applied to a person

Page 227

carrying arms, and assumed by certain Rājpūts and also by some of the
lower castes. A third group of Mānas are now amalgamated with the Kunbis
as a regular subdivision of that caste, though they are regarded as somewhat
lower than the others. They have also a number of exogamous septs of the
usual titular and totemistic types, the few recognisable names being Marāthi.
It is worth noticing that several pairs of these septs, as Jamāre and Gazbe,
Narnari and Chudri, Wāgh and Rāwat, and others are prohibited from
intermarriage. And this may be a relic of some wider scheme of division of
the type common among the Australian aborigines. The social customs of the
Mānas are the same as those of the other lower Marātha castes, as described
in the articles on Kunbi, Kohli and Mahār. A bride-price of Rs. 12–8 is
usually paid, and if the bridegroom’s father has the money, he takes it with
him on going to arrange for the match. Only one married woman of the
bridegroom’s family accompanies him to the wedding, and she throws rice
over him five times. Four days in the year are appointed for the celebration
of weddings, the festivals of Shivrātri and of Akhātij, and a day each in the
months of Māgh (January) and Phāgun (February). This rule, however, is not
universal. Brāhmans do not usually officiate at their ceremonies, but they
employ a Brāhman to prepare the rice which is thrown over the couples.
Marriage within the sept is forbidden, as well as the union of the children of
two sisters. But the practice of marrying a brother’s daughter to a sister’s son
is a very favourite one, being known as Māhunchār, and in this respect the
Mānas resemble the Gonds. When a widow is to be remarried, she stops on
the way by the bank of a stream as she is proceeding to her new husband’s
house, and here her clothes are taken off and buried by an exorcist with a
view to laying the first husband’s spirit and preventing it from troubling the
new household. If a woman goes wrong with a man of another caste she is
not finally cast out, but if she has a child she must first dispose of it to
somebody else after it is weaned. She may then be re-admitted into caste by
having her hair shaved off and giving three feasts; the first is prepared by the
caste and eaten outside her house, the second is prepared by her relatives and
eaten within her house, and at the third the caste reinstate her by partaking of
food cooked by herself. The dead are either buried or burnt; in the former
case a feast is given immediately after the burial and no further mourning is
observed; in the latter the period of mourning is three days. As among the

Page 228

Gonds, the dead are laid with feet to the north. A woman is impure for seven
days after child-birth.

The Mānas have Bhāts or genealogists of their own caste, a separate one
being appointed for each sept. The Bhāt of any sept can only accept gifts
from members of that sept, though he may take food from any one of the
caste. The Bhāts are in the position of beggars, and the other Mānas will not
take food from them. Every man must have a Bhāt for his family under
penalty of being temporarily put out of caste. It is said that the Bhāts
formerly had books showing the pedigrees of the different families, but that
once in a spirit of arrogance they placed their shoes upon the books; and the
other Mānas, not brooking this insolence, burnt the books. The gravity of
such an act may be realised when it is stated that if anybody even threatens
to hit a Māna with a shoe, the indignity put upon him is so great that he is
temporarily excluded from caste and penalised for readmission. Since this
incident the Bhāts have to address the Mānas as ‘Brahma,’ to show their
respect, the Māna replying ‘Rām, Rām.’ Their women wear short loin-cloths,
exposing part of the thigh, like the Gonds. They eat pork and drink liquor,
but will take cooked food only from Brāhmans.

1 This article is based on papers by Mr. Hīra Lāl and G. Padaya Naidu of the Gazetteer Office.
2 Papers on the Aboriginal Tribes of the Central Provinces, p. 6.
3 Rev. A. Wood in Chānda District Gazetteer, para. 96.

Page 229

Mānbhao

1. History and nature of the sect

Mānbhao.1—A religious sect or order, which has now become a caste,
belonging to the Marātha Districts of the Central Provinces and to Berār.
Their total strength in India in 1911 was 10,000 persons, of whom the
Central Provinces and Berār contained 4000. The name would appear to
have some such meaning as ‘The reverend brothers.’ The Mānbhaos are
stated to be a Vaishnavite order founded in Berār some two centuries ago.2
They themselves say that their order is a thousand years old and that it was
founded by one Arjun Bhat, who lived at Domegaon, near Ahmadnagar. He
was a great Sanskrit scholar and a devotee of Krishna, and preached his
doctrines to all except the Impure castes. Ridhpur, in Berār, is the present
headquarters of the order, and contains a monastery and three temples,
dedicated to Krishna and Dattātreya,3 the only deities recognised by the
Mānbhaos. Each temple is named after a village, and is presided over by a
Mahant elected from the celibate Mānbhaos. There are other Mahants, also
known after the names of villages or towns in which the monasteries over
which they preside are located. Among these are Sheone, from the village
near Chāndur in Amraoti District; Akulne, a village near Ahmadnagar;
Lāsorkar, from Lāsor, near Aurangābād; Mehkarkar, from Mehkar in
Buldāna; and others. The order thus belongs to Berār and the adjoining parts
of India. Colonel Mackenzie describes Ridhpur as follows: “The name is
said to be derived from ridh, meaning blood, a Rākshas or demon having
been killed there by Parasurāma, and it owes its sanctity to the fact that the
god lived there. Black stones innumerable scattered about the town show
where the god’s footsteps became visible. At Ridhpur Krishna is represented
by an ever-open, sleeplessly watching eye, and some Mānbhaos carry about

Page 230

a small black stone disk with an eye painted on it as an amulet.” Frequently
their shrines contain no images, but are simply chabutras or platforms built
over the place where Krishna or Dattātreya left marks of their footprints.
Over the platform is a small veranda, which the Mānbhaos kiss, calling upon
the name of the god. Sukli, in Bhandāra, is also a headquarters of the caste,
and contains many Mānbhao tombs. Here they burn camphor in honour of
Dattātreya and make offerings of cocoanuts. They make pilgrimages to the
different shrines at the full moons of Chait (March) and Kārtik (October).
They pay reverence to no deities except Krishna and Dattātreya, and observe
the festivals of Gokul Ashtami in August and Datta-Jayantri in December.
They consider the month of Aghan (November) as holy, because Krishna
called it so in the Bhāgavat-Gīta. This is their sacred book, and they reject
the other Hindu scriptures. Their conception of Krishna is based on his
description of himself to Arjun in the Bhāgavat-Gīta as follows: “‘Behold
things wonderful, never seen before, behold in this my body the whole
world, animate and inanimate. But as thou art unable to see with these thy
natural eyes, I will give thee a heavenly eye, with which behold my divine
connection.’

“The son of Pandu then beheld within the body of the god of gods standing
together the whole universe divided forth into its vast variety. He was
overwhelmed with wonder and every hair was raised on end. ‘But I am not
to be seen as thou hast seen me even by the assistance of the Vedas, by
mortification, by sacrifices, by charitable gifts: but I am to be seen, to be
known in truth, and to be obtained by that worship which is offered up to me
alone: and he goeth unto me whose works are done for me: who esteemeth
me supreme: who is my servant only: who hath abandoned all consequences,
and who liveth amongst all men without hatred.’”

Again: “He my servant is dear to me who is free from enmity, the friend of
all nature, merciful, exempt from all pride and selfishness, the same in pain
and in pleasure, patient of wrong, contented, constantly devout, of subdued
passions and firm resolves, and whose mind and understanding are fixed on
me alone.”

Page 231

2. Divisions of the order

The Mānbhaos are now divided into three classes: the Brahmachāri; the
Gharbāri; and the Bhope. The Brahmachāri are the ascetic members of the
sect who subsist by begging and devote their lives to meditation, prayer and
spiritual instruction. The Gharbāri are those who, while leading a mendicant
life, wearing the distinctive black dress of the order and having their heads
shaved, are permitted to get married with the permission of their Mahant or
guru. The ceremony is performed in strict privacy inside a temple. A man
sometimes signifies his choice of a spouse by putting his jholi or beggar’s
wallet upon hers; if she lets it remain there, the betrothal is complete. A
woman may show her preference for a man by bringing a pair of garlands
and placing one on his head and the other on that of the image of Krishna.
The marriage is celebrated according to the custom of the Kunbis, but
without feasting or music. Widows are permitted to marry again. Married
women do not wear bangles nor toe-rings nor the customary necklace of
beads; they put on no jewellery, and have no choli or bodice. The Bhope or
Bhoall, the third division of the caste, are wholly secular and wear no
distinctive dress, except sometimes a black head-cloth. They may engage in
any occupation that pleases them, and sometimes act as servants in the
temples of the caste. In Berār they are divided into thirteen bas or orders,
named after the disciples of Arjun Bhat, who founded the various shrines.
The Mānbhaos are recruited by initiation of both men and women from any
except the impure castes. Young children who have been vowed by their
parents to a religious life or are left without relations, are taken into the
order. Women usually join it either as children or late in life. The celibate
members, male or female, live separately in companies like monks and nuns.
They do not travel together, and hold services in their temples at different
times. A woman admitted into the order is henceforward the disciple of the
woman who initiated her by whispering the guru mantra or sacred verse into
her ear. She addresses her preceptress as mother and the other women as
sisters. The Mānbhaos are intelligent and generally literate, and they lead a

Page 232

simple and pure life. They are respectable and are respected by the people,
and a guru or spiritual teacher is often taken from them in place of a
Brāhman or Gosain. They often act as priests or gurus to the Mahārs, for
whom Brāhmans will not perform these services. Their honesty and humility
are proverbial among the Kunbis, and are in pleasing contrast to the
character of many of the Hindu mendicant orders. They consider it essential
that all their converts should be able to read the Bhāgavat-Gīta or a
commentary on it, and for this purpose teach them to read and write during
the rainy season when they are assembled at one of their monasteries.

3. Religious observances and customs

One of the leading tenets of the Mānbhaos is a respect for all forms of
animal and even vegetable life, much on a par with that of the Jains. They
strain water through a cloth before drinking it, and then delicately wipe the
cloth to preserve any insects that may be upon it. They should not drink
water in, and hence cannot reside in, any village where animal sacrifices are
offered to a deity. They will not cut down a tree nor break off a branch, or
even a blade of grass, nor pluck a fruit or an ear of corn. Some, it is said, will
not even bathe in tanks for fear of destroying insect-life. For this reason also
they readily accept cooked food as alms, so that they may avoid the risk of
the destruction of life involved in cooking. The Mānbhaos dislike the din
and noise of towns, and live generally in secluded places, coming into the
towns only to beg. Except in the rains they wander about from place to
place. They beg in the morning, and then return home and, after bathing and
taking their food, read their religious books. They must always worship
Krishna before taking food, and for this purpose when travelling they carry
an image of the deity about with them. They will take food and water from
the higher castes, but they must not do so from persons of low caste on pain
of temporary excommunication. They neither smoke nor chew tobacco. Both
men and women shave the head clean, and men also the face. This is first
done on initiation by the village barber. But the sendhi or scalp-lock and
moustaches of the novice must be cut off by his guru, this being the special

Page 233

mark of his renunciation of the world. The scalp-locks of the various
candidates are preserved until a sufficient quantity of hair has been collected,
when ropes are made of it, which they fasten round their loins. This may be
because Hindus attach a special efficacy to the scalp-lock, perhaps as being
the seat of a man’s strength or power. The nuns also shave their heads, and
generally eschew every kind of personal adornment. Both monks and nuns
usually dress in black or ashen-grey clothes as a mark of humility, though
some have discarded black in favour of the usual Hindu mendicant colour of
red ochre. The black colour is in keeping with the complexion of Krishna,
their chief god. They dye their cloths with lamp-black mixed with a little
water and oil. They usually sleep on the ground, with the exception of those
who are Mahants, and they sometimes have no metal vessels, but use bags
made of strong cloth for holding food and water. Men’s names have the
suffix Boa, as Datto Boa, Kesho Boa, while those of boys end in da, as
Manoda, Raojīda, and those of women in Bai, as Gopa Bai, Som Bai. The
dead are buried, not in the common burial-grounds, but in some waste place.
The corpse is laid on its side, facing the east, with head to the north and feet
to the south. A piece of silk or other valuable cloth is placed on it, on which
salt is sprinkled, and the earth is then filled in and the ground levelled so as
to leave no trace of the grave. No memorial is erected over a Mānbhao tomb,
and no mourning nor ceremony of purification is observed, nor are oblations
offered to the spirits of the dead. If the dead man leaves any property, it is
expended on feeding the brotherhood for ten days; and if not, the Mahant of
his order usually does this in his name.

4. Hostility between Mānbhaos and Brāhmans

The Mānbhaos are dissenters from orthodox Hinduism, and have thus
naturally incurred the hostility of the Brāhmans. Mr. Kitts remarks of them:4
“The Brāhmans hate the Mānbhaos, who have not only thrown off the
Brāhmanical yoke themselves, but do much to oppose the influence of
Brāhmans among the agriculturists. The Brāhmans represent them as
descended from one Krishna Bhat, a Brāhman who was outcasted for

Page 234

keeping a beautiful Māng woman as his mistress. His four sons were called
the Māng-bhaos or Māng brothers.” This is an excellent instance of the
Brāhman talent for pressing etymology into their service as an argument, in
which respect they resemble the Jesuits. By asserting that the Mānbhaos are
descended from a Māng woman, one of the most despised castes, they
attempt to dispose of these enemies of a Brāhman hegemony without further
ado.

Another story about their wearing black or ashen-coloured clothes related by
Colonel Mackenzie is that Krishna Bhat’s followers, refusing to believe the
aspersions cast on their leader by the Brāhmans, but knowing that some one
among them had been guilty of the sin imputed to him, determined to decide
the matter by the ordeal of fire. Having made a fire, they cast into it their
own clothes and those of their guru, each man having previously written his
name on his garments. The sacred fire made short work of all the clothes
except those of Krishna Bhat, which it rejected and refused to burn, thereby
forcing the unwilling disciples to believe that the finger of God pointed to
their revered guru as the sinner. In spite of the shock of thus discovering that
their idol had feet of very human clay, they still continued to regard Krishna
Bhat’s precepts as good and worthy of being followed, only stipulating that
for all time Mānbhaos should wear clothes the colour of ashes, in memory of
the sacred fire which had disclosed to them their guru’s sin.

Captain Mackintosh also relates that “About A.D. 1780, a Brāhman named
Anand Rishi, an inhabitant of Paithan on the Godāvari, maltreated a
Mānbhao, who came to ask for alms at his door. This Mānbhao, after being
beaten, proceeded to his friends in the vicinity, and they collected a large
number of brethren and went to the Brāhman to demand satisfaction; Anand
Rishi assembled a number of Gosains and his friends, and pursued and
attacked the Mānbhaos, who fled and asked Ahalya Bai, Rāni of Indore, to
protect them; she endeavoured to pacify Anand Rishi by telling him that the
Mānbhaos were her gurus; he said that they were Māngs, but declared that if
they agreed to his proposals he would forgive them; one of them was that
they were not to go to a Brāhman’s house to ask for alms, and another that if
any Brāhman repeated Anand Rishi’s name and drew a line across the road
when a Mānbhao was advancing, the Mānbhao, without saying a word, must

Page 235

return the road he came. Notwithstanding this attempt to prevent their
approaching a Brāhman’s house, they continue to ask alms of the Brāhmans,
and some Brāhmans make a point of supplying them with provisions.”

This story endeavours to explain a superstition still observed by the caste.
This is that when a Mānbhao is proceeding along a road, if any one draws a
line across the road with a stick in front of him the Mānbhao will wait
without passing the line until some one else comes up and crosses it before
him. In reality this is probably a primitive superstition similar to that which
makes a man stop when a snake has crossed the road in front of him and
efface its track before proceeding. It is said that the members of the order
also carry their sticks upside down, and a saying is repeated about them:

Mānbhao hokar kāle kapre dārhi mūchi mundhāta hai,
Ulti lakri hāth men pakri woh kya Sāhib milta hai;

or, “The Mānbhao wears black clothes, shaves his face and holds his stick
upside down, and thinks he will find God that way.”

This saying is attributed to Kabīr.

1 This article is compiled from notes on the caste drawn up by Colonel Mackenzie and contributed
to the Pioneer newspaper by Mrs. Horsburgh; Captain Mackintosh’s Account of the Manbhaos
(India Office Tracts); and a paper by Pyāre Lāl Misra, Ethnographic clerk.

2 Berār Census Report (1881), p. 62.
3 Dattātreya was a celebrated Sivite devotee who has been deified as an incarnation of Siva.

4 Berār Census Report (1881), p. 62.

Page 236

Māng
List of Paragraphs

1. Origin and traditions
2. Subdivisions
3. Marriage
4. Widow marriage
5. Burial
6. Occupation
7. Religion and social status

1. Origin and traditions

Māng.1—A low impure caste of the Marātha Districts, who act as village
musicians and castrate bullocks, while their women serve as midwives. The
Māngs are also sometimes known as Vājantri or musician. They numbered
more than 90,000 persons in 1911, of whom 30,000 belonged to the Nāgpur
and Nerbudda Divisions of the Central Provinces, and 60,000 to Berār. The
real origin of the Māngs is obscure, but they probably originated from the
subject tribes and became a caste through the adoption of the menial services
which constitute their profession. In a Marātha book called the Shūdra
Kamlākar2, it is stated that the Māng was the offspring of the union of a
Vaideh man and an Ambashtha woman. A Vaideh was the illegitimate child
of a Vaishya father and a Brāhman mother, and an Ambashtha of a Brāhman
father and a Vaishya mother. The business of the Māng was to play on the
flute and to make known the wishes of the Rāja to his subjects by beat of
drum. He was to live in the forest or outside the village, and was not to enter
it except with the Rāja’s permission. He was to remove the dead bodies of

Page 237

strangers, to hang criminals, and to take away and appropriate the clothes
and bedding of the dead. The Māngs themselves relate the following legend
of their origin as given by Mr. Sāthe: Long ago before cattle were used for
ploughing, there was so terrible a famine upon the earth that all the grain
was eaten up, and there was none left for seed. Mahādeo took pity on the
few men who were left alive, and gave them some grain for sowing. In those
days men used to drag the plough through the earth themselves. But when a
Kunbi, to whom Mahādeo had given some seed, went to try and sow it, he
and his family were so emaciated by hunger that they were unable, in spite
of their united efforts, to get the plough through the ground. In this pitiable
case the Kunbi besought Mahādeo to give him some further assistance, and
Mahādeo then appeared, and, bringing with him the bull Nandi, upon which
he rode, told the Kunbi to yoke it to the plough. This was done, and so long
as Mahādeo remained present, Nandi dragged the plough peaceably and
successfully. But as soon as the god disappeared, the bull became restive and
refused to work any longer. The Kunbi being helpless, again complained to
Mahādeo, when the god appeared, and in his wrath at the conduct of the bull,
great drops of perspiration stood upon his brow. One of these fell to the
ground, and immediately a coal-black man sprang up and stood ready to do
Mahādeo’s bidding. He was ordered to bring the bull to reason, and he went
and castrated it, after which it worked well and quietly; and since then the
Kunbis have always used bullocks for ploughing, and the descendants of the
man, who was the first Māng, are employed in the office for which he was
created. It is further related that Nandi, the bull, cursed the Māng in his pain,
saying that he and his descendants should never derive any profit from
ploughing with cattle. And the Māngs say that to this day none of them
prosper by taking to cultivation, and quote the following proverb: ‘Keli
kheti, Zhāli mati,’ or, ‘If a Māng sows grain he will only reap dust.’

2. Subdivisions

The caste is divided into the following subcastes: Dakhne, Khāndeshe and
Berārya, or those belonging to the Deccan, Khāndesh and Berār; Ghodke,

Page 238

those who tend horses; Dafle, tom-tom players; Uchle, pickpockets; Pindāri,
descendants of the old freebooters; Kakarkādhe, stone-diggers; Holer, hide-
curers; and Garori. The Garoris3 are a sept of vagrant snake-charmers and
jugglers. Many are professional criminals.

Māng musicians with drums

3. Marriage

The caste is divided into exogamous family groups named after animals or
other objects, or of a titular nature. One or two have the names of other
castes. Members of the same group may not intermarry. Those who are well-
to-do marry their daughters very young for the sake of social estimation, but
there is no compulsion in this matter. In families which are particularly
friendly, Mr. Sāthe remarks, children may be betrothed before birth if the
two mothers are with child together. Betel is distributed, and a definite
contract is made, on the supposition that a boy and girl will be born.
Sometimes the abdomen of each woman is marked with red vermilion. A

Page 239

grown-up girl should not be allowed to see her husband’s face before
marriage. The wedding is held at the bride’s house, but if it is more
convenient that it should be in the bridegroom’s village, a temporary house
is found for the bride’s party, and the marriage-shed is built in front of it. The
bride must wear a yellow bodice and cloth, yellow and red being generally
considered among Hindus as the auspicious colours for weddings. When she
leaves for her husband’s house she puts on another or going-away dress,
which should be as fine as the family can afford, and thereafter she may
wear any colour except white. The distinguishing marks of a married woman
are the mangal-sūtram or holy thread, which her husband ties on her neck at
marriage; the garsoli or string of black beads round the neck; the silver toe-
rings and glass bangles. If any one of these is lost, it must be replaced at
once, or she is likely soon to be a widow. The food served at the wedding-
feast consists of rice and pulse, but more essential than these is an ample
provision of liquor. It is a necessary feature of a Māng wedding that the
bridegroom should go to it riding on a horse. The Mahārs, another low caste
of the Marātha Districts, worship the horse, and between them and the
Māngs there exists a long-standing feud, so that they do not, if they can help
it, drink of the same well. The sight of a Māng riding on a horse is thus gall
and wormwood to the Mahārs, who consider it a terrible degradation to the
noble animal, and this fact inflaming their natural enmity, formerly led to
riots between the castes. Under native rule the Māngs were public
executioners, and it was said to be the proudest moment of Māng’s life when
he could perform his office on a Mahār.

The bride proceeds to her husband’s house for a short visit immediately after
the marriage, and then goes home again. Thereafter, till such time as she
finally goes to live with him, she makes brief visits for festivals or on other
social occasions, or to help her mother-in-law, if her assistance is required. If
the mother-in-law is ill and requires somebody to wait on her, or if she is a
shrew and wants some one to bully, or if she has strict ideas of discipline and
wishes personally to conduct the bride’s training for married life, she makes
the girl come more frequently and stay longer.

Page 240

4. Widow marriage

The remarriage of widows is permitted, and a widow may marry any one
except persons of her own family group or her husband’s elder brother, who
stands to her in the light of a father. She is permitted, but not obliged, to
marry her husband’s younger brother, but if he has performed the dead man’s
obsequies, she may not marry him, as this act has placed him in the relation
of a son to her deceased husband. More usually the widow marries some one
in another village, because the remarriage is always held in some slight
disrepute, and she prefers to be at a distance from her first husband’s family.
Divorce is said to be permitted only for persistent misconduct on the part of
the wife.

5. Burial

The caste always bury the dead and observe mourning only for three days.
On returning from a burial they all get drunk, and then go to the house of the
deceased and chew the bitter leaves of the nīm tree (Melia indica). These
they then spit out of their mouths to indicate their complete severance from
the dead man.

6. Occupation

Page 241

The caste beat drums at village festivals, and castrate cattle, and they also
make brooms and mats of date-palm and keep leeches for blood-letting.
Some of them are village watchmen and their women act as midwives. As
soon as a baby is born, the midwife blows into its mouth, ears and nose in
order to clear them of any impediments. When a man is initiated by a guru
or spiritual preceptor, the latter blows into his ear, and the Māngs therefore
say that on account of this act of the midwife they are the gurus of all
Hindus. During an eclipse the Māngs beg, because the demons Rāhu and
Ketu, who are believed to swallow the sun and moon on such occasions,
were both Māngs, and devout Hindus give alms to their fellow-castemen in
order to appease them. Those of them who are thieves are said not to steal
from the persons of a woman, a bangle-seller, a Lingāyat Māli or another
Māng.4 In Marātha villages they sometimes take the place of Chamārs, and
work in leather, and one writer says of them: “The Māng is a village menial
in the Marātha villages, making all leather ropes, thongs and whips, which
are used by the cultivators; he frequently acts as watchman; he is by
profession a thief and executioner; he readily hires himself as an assassin,
and when he commits a robbery he also frequently murders.” In his menial
capacity he receives presents at seed-time and harvest, and it is said that the
Kunbi will never send the Māng empty away, because he represents the
wrath of Mahādeo, being made from the god’s sweat when he was angry.

7. Religion and social status

The caste especially venerate the goddess Devi. They apparently identify
Devi with Sāraswati, the goddess of wisdom, and they have a story to the
effect that once Brahma wished to ravish his daughter Sāraswati. She fled
from him and went to all the gods, but none of them would protect her for
fear of Brahma. At last in despair she came to a Māng’s house, and the Māng
stood in the door and kept off Brahma with a wooden club. In return for this
Sāraswati blessed him and said that he and his descendants should never lack
for food. They also revere Mahādeo, and on every Monday they worship the
cow, placing vermilion on her forehead and washing her feet. The cat is

Page 242

regarded as a sacred animal, and a Māng’s most solemn oath is sworn on a
cat. A house is defiled if a cat or a dog dies or a cat has kittens in it, and all
the earthen pots must be broken. If a man accidentally kills a cat or a dog a
heavy penance is exacted, and two feasts must be given to the caste. To kill
an ass or a monkey is a sin only less heinous. A man is also put out of caste
if kicked or beaten with a shoe by any one of another caste, even a Brāhman,
or if he is struck with the kathri or mattress made of rags which the villagers
put on their sleeping-cots. Mr. Gayer remarks5 that “The Māngs show great
respect for the bamboo; and at a marriage the bridal couple are made to stand
in a bamboo basket. They also reverence the nīm tree, and the Māngs of
Sholapur spread hariāli6 grass and nīm leaves on the spot where one of their
caste dies.” The social status of the Māngs is of the lowest. They usually live
in a separate quarter of the village and have a well for their own use. They
may not enter temples. It is recorded that under native rule the Mahārs and
Māngs were not allowed within the gates of Poona between 3 P.M. and 9
A.M., because before nine and after three their bodies cast too long a
shadow; and whenever their shadow fell upon a Brāhman it polluted him, so
that he dare not taste food or water until he had bathed and washed the
impurity away. So also no low-caste man was allowed to live in a walled
town; cattle and dogs could freely enter and remain but not the Mahār or
Māng.7 The caste will eat the flesh of pigs, rats, crocodiles and jackals and
the leavings of others, and some of them will eat beef. Men may be
distinguished by the senai flute which they carry and by a large ring of gold
or brass worn in the lobe of the ear. A Māng’s sign-manual is a
representation of his bhall-singāra or castration-knife. Women are tattooed
before marriage, with dots on the forehead, nose, cheeks and chin, and with
figures of a date-palm on the forearm, a scorpion on the palm of the hand,
and flies on the fingers. The caste do not bear a good character, and it is said
of a cruel man, ‘Māng-Nirdayi,’ or ‘Hardhearted as a Māng.’

1 This article is based partly on a paper by Mr. Achyut Sitārām Sāthe, Extra Assistant
Commissioner.

2 P. 389.
3 See also separate article Māng-Garori.

Page 243

4 Berār Census Report (1881), p. 147.

5 Lectures on the Criminal Tribes of the Central Provinces, p. 79.
6 Cynodon dactylon.

7 Dr, Murray Mitchell’s Great Religions of India, p. 63.

Page 244

Māng-Garori
Māng-Garori.—This is a criminal subdivision of the Māng caste, residing
principally in Berār. They were not separately recorded at the census. The
name Garori appears to be a corruption of Garūdi, and signifies a snake-
charmer.1 Garūda, the Brahminy kite, the bird on which Vishnu rides, was
the great subduer of snakes, and hence probably snake-charmers are called
Garūdi. Some of the Māng-Garoris are snake-charmers, and this may have
been the original occupation of the caste, though the bulk of them now
appear to live by dealing in cattle and thieving. The following notice of them
is abstracted from Major Gunthorpe’s Notes on Criminal Tribes.2 They
usually travel about with small pāls or tents, taking their wives, children,
buffaloes and dogs with them. The men are well set up and tall. Their
costume is something like that worn by professional gymnasts, consisting of
light and short reddish-brown drawers (chaddi), a waistband with fringe at
either end (katchhe), and a sheet thrown over the shoulders. The Nāik or
headman of the camp may be recognised by his wearing some red woollen
cloth about his person or a red shawl over his shoulders. The women have
short sāris (body-cloths), usually of blue, and tied in the Telugu fashion.
They are generally very violent when any attempt is made to search an
encampment, especially if there is stolen property concealed in it. Instances
have been known of their seizing their infants by the ankles and swinging
them round their heads, declaring they would continue doing so till the
children died, if the police did not leave the camp. Sometimes also the
women of a gang have been known to throw off all their clothing and appear
in a perfect state of nudity, declaring they would charge the police with
violating their modesty. Men of this tribe are expert cattle-lifters, but confine
themselves chiefly to buffaloes, which they steal while out grazing and very
dexterously disguise by trimming the horns and firing, so as to avoid
recognition by their rightful owners. To steal goats and sheep is also one of
their favourite occupations, and they will either carry the animals off from
their pens at night or kill them while out grazing, in the following manner:
having marked a sheep or goat which is feeding farthest away from the

Page 245

flock, the thief awaits his opportunity till the shepherd’s back is turned, when
the animal is quickly captured. Placing his foot on the back of the neck near
the head, and seizing it under the chin with his right hand, the thief breaks
the animal’s neck by a sudden jerk; he then throws the body into a bush or in
some dip in the ground to hide it, and walks away, watching from a distance.
The shepherd, ignorant of the loss of one of his animals, goes on leisurely
driving his flock before him, and when he is well out of sight the Māng-
Garori removes the captured carcase to his encampment. Great care is taken
that the skin, horns and hoofs should be immediately burnt so as to avoid
detection. Their ostensible occupation is to trade in barren half-starved
buffaloes and buffalo calves, or in country ponies. They also purchase from
Gaoli herdsmen barren buffaloes, which they profess to be able to make
fertile; if successful they return them for double the purchase-money, but if
not, having obtained if possible some earnest-money, they abscond and sell
the animals at a distance.3 Like the Bhāmtas, the Māng-Garoris, Major
Gunthorpe states, make it a rule not to give a girl in marriage until the
intended husband has proved himself an efficient thief. Mr. Gayer4 writes as
follows of the caste: “I do not think Major Gunthorpe lays sufficient
emphasis on the part taken by the women in crimes, for they apparently do
by far the major part of the thieving, Sherring says the men never commit
house-breaking and very seldom rob on the highway: he calls them
‘wanderers, showmen, jugglers and conjurors,’ and describes them as
robbers who get their information by performing before the houses of rich
bankers and others. Māng-Gārori5 women steal in markets and other places
of public resort. They wait to see somebody put down his clothes or bag of
rupees and watch till his attention is attracted elsewhere, when, walking up
quietly between the article and its owner, they drop their petticoat either over
or by it, and manage to transfer the stolen property into their basket while
picking up the petticoat. If an unfavourable omen occurs on the way when
the women set out to pilfer they place a stone on the ground and dash
another on to it saying, ‘If the obstacle is removed, break’; if the stone struck
is broken, they consider that the obstacle portended by the unfavourable
omen is removed from their path, and proceed on their way; but if not, they
return. Stolen articles are often bartered at liquor-shops for drink, and the
Kalārs act as receivers of stolen property for the Māng-Gāroris.”

Page 246

The following are some particulars taken from an old account of the criminal
Māngs;6 Their leader or headman was called the nāik and was elected by a
majority of votes, though considerable regard was paid to heredity. The
nāik’s person and property were alike inviolable; after a successful foray
each of the gang contributed a quarter of his share to the nāik, and from the
fund thus made up were defrayed the expenses of preparation, religious
offerings and the triumphal feast. A pair of shoes were usually given to a
Brāhman and alms to the poor. To each band was attached an informer, who
was also receiver of the stolen goods. These persons were usually bangle- or
perfume-sellers or jewellers. In this capacity they were admitted into the
women’s apartments and so enabled to form a correct notion of the
topography of a house and a shrewd guess as to the wealth of its inmates.
Like all barbarous tribes and all persons addicted to criminal practices the
Māngs were extremely superstitious. They never set out on an expedition on
a Friday. After the birth of a child the mother and another woman stood on
opposite sides of the cradle, and the former tossed her child to the other,
commending it to the mercy of Jai Gopāl, and waited to receive it back in
like manner in the name of Jai Govind. Both Gopāl and Govind are names of
Krishna, The Māngs usually married young in life. If a girl happened to hang
heavy on hand she was married at the age of puberty to the deity. In other
words, she was attached as a prostitute to the temple of the god Khandoba or
the goddess Yellama. Those belonging to the service of the latter were wont
in the month of February to parade the streets in a state of utter nudity. When
a bachelor wished to marry a widow he was first united to a swallow-wort
plant, and this was immediately dug up and transplanted, and withering
away left him at liberty to marry the widow. If a lady survived the sorrow
caused by the death of two or three husbands she could not again enter the
holy state unless she consented to be married with a fowl under her armpit;
the unfortunate bird being afterwards killed to appease the manes of her
former consorts.

1 From a note by Mr. Hīra Lāl.
2 Times Press, Bombay, 1882.

3 Kennedy, Criminal Classes of the Bombay Presidency, p. 122.

Lectures on some Criminal Tribes of India.

Page 247

4 5 This passage is quoted by Mr. Gayer from the Supplement to the Central Provinces Police
Gazette of 24th January 1905.

6 Hutton’s Thugs, Dacoits and Gang-robbers of India (1857), pp. 164–168, quoting an account by
Captain Barr.

Page 248

Manihār
Manihār.1—A small caste of pedlars and hawkers. In northern India the
Manihārs are makers of glass bangles, and correspond to the Kachera caste
of the Central Provinces. Mr. Nesfield remarks2 that the special industry of
the Manihārs of the United Provinces is the making of glass bangles or
bracelets. These are an indispensable adjunct to the domestic life of the
Hindu woman; for the glass bangle is not worn for personal ornament, but as
the badge of the matrimonial state, like the wedding-ring in Europe. But in
the Central Provinces glass bangles are made by the Kacheras and the
Muhammadan Turkāris or Sīsgars, and the Manihārs are petty hawkers of
stationery and articles for the toilet, such as miniature looking-glasses,
boxes, stockings, needles and thread, spangles, and imitation jewellery; and
Hindu Jogis and others who take to this occupation are accustomed to give
their caste as Manihār. In 1911 nearly 700 persons belonging to the caste
were returned from the northern Districts of the Central Provinces. The
Manihārs are nominally Muhammadans, but they retain many Hindu
customs. At their weddings they erect a marriage-tent, anoint the couple with
oil and turmeric and make them wear a kankan or wrist-band, to which is
attached a small purse containing a little mustard-seed and a silver ring. The
mustard is intended to scare away the evil spirits. When the marriage
procession reaches the bride’s village it is met by her people, one of whom
holds a bamboo in his hands and bars the advance of the procession. The
bridegroom’s father thereupon makes a present of a rupee to the village
panchāyat, and his people are allowed to proceed. When the bridegroom
reaches the bride’s house he finds her younger sister carrying a kalās or pot
of water on her head; he drops a rupee into it and enters the house. The
bride’s sister then comes holding above her head a small frame like a tāzia3
with a cocoanut core hanging inside. She raises the frame as high as she can
to prevent the bridegroom from plucking out the cocoanut core, which,
however, he succeeds in doing in the end. The girl applies powdered mehndi
or henna to the little finger of the boy’s right hand, in return for which she
receives a rupee and a piece of cloth. The Kāzi then recites verses from the

Page 249

Korān which the bridegroom repeats after him, and the bride does the same
in her turn. This is the Nikāh or marriage proper, and before it takes place
the bridegroom’s father must present a nose-ring to the bride. The parents
also fix the Meher or dowry, which, however, is not a dowry proper, but a
stipulation that if the bridegroom should put away his wife after marriage he
will pay her a certain agreed sum. After the Nikāh the bridegroom is given
some spices, which he grinds on a slab with a roller. He must do the grinding
very slowly and gently so as to make no noise, or it is believed that the
married life of the couple will be broken by quarrels. A widow is permitted
to marry the younger brother of her deceased husband, but not his elder
brother. The caste bury their dead with the head to the north. The corpse is
first bathed and wrapped in a new white sheet, with another sheet over it,
and is then laid on a cot or in a janāza or coffin. While it is being carried to
the cemetery the bearers are changed every few steps, so that every man who
accompanies the funeral may carry the corpse for a short distance. When it is
lowered into the grave the sheet is taken off and given to a Fakīr or beggar.
When the body is covered with earth the priest reads the funeral verses at a
distance of forty steps from the grave. Feasts are given to the caste-fellows
on the third, tenth, twentieth and fortieth days after the death. The Manihārs
observe the Shabrāt festival by distributing to the caste-fellows halua or a
mixture of melted butter and flour. The Shabrāt is the middle night of the
month Shabān, and Muhammad declared that on this night God registers the
actions which every man will perform during the following year, and all
those who are fated to die and the children who are to be born. Like Hindu
widows the Manihār women break their bangles when their husband’s corpse
is removed to the burial-ground. The Manihārs eat flesh, but not beef or
pork; and they also abstain from alcoholic liquor. If a girl is seduced and
made pregnant before marriage either by a man of the caste or an outsider,
she remains in her father’s house until her child has been born, and may then
be married either to her paramour or any other man of the caste by the
simple repetition of the Nikāh or marriage verses, omitting all other
ceremonies. The Manihārs will admit into their community converted
Hindus belonging even to the lowest castes.

1 This article is based on papers by Rai Sāhib Nānakchand, B.A., Headmaster, Saugor High
School, and Munshi Pyāre Lāl Misra of the Gazetteer office.

Page 250

2 Brief View, p. 30.

3 The tāzias are ornamental representations of the tomb of Hussain, which the Muhammadans
make at the Muharram festival.

Page 251

Mannewār
Mannewār.1—A small tribe belonging to the south or Telugu-speaking
portion of the Chānda District, where they mustered about 1600 persons in
1911. The home of the tribe is the Hyderābād State, where it numbers 22,000
persons, and the Mannewārs are said to have once been dominant over a part
of that territory. The name is derived from a Telugu word mannem, meaning
forest, while wār is the plural termination in Telugu, Mannewār thus
signifying ‘the people of the forest.’ The tribe appear to be the inferior
branch of the Koya Gonds, and they are commonly called Mannewār Koyas
as opposed to the Koya Doras or the superior branch, Dora meaning ‘lord’ or
master. The Koya Doras thus correspond to the Rāj-Gonds of the north of the
Province and the Mannewār Koyas to the Dhur or ‘dust’ Gonds.2 The tribe is
divided into three exogamous groups: the Nalugu Velpulu worshipping four
gods, the Ayidu Velpulu worshipping five, and the Anu Velpulu six. A man
must marry a woman of one of the divisions worshipping a different number
of gods from his own, but the Mannewārs do not appear to know the names
of these gods, and consequently no veneration can be paid to them at
present, and they survive solely for the purpose of regulating marriage.
When a betrothal is made a day is fixed for taking an omen. In the early
morning the boy who is to be married has his face washed and turmeric
smeared on his feet, and is seated on a wooden seat inside the house. The
elders of the village then proceed outside it towards the rising sun and watch
for any omen given by an animal or bird crossing their path. If this is good
the marriage is celebrated, and if bad the match is broken off. In the former
case five of the elders take their food on returning from the search for the
omen and immediately proceed to the bride’s village. Here they are met by
the Pesāmuda or village priest, and stay for three days, when the amount of
the dowry is settled and a date fixed for the wedding. The marriage
ceremony resembles that of the low Telugu castes. The couple are seated on
a plough-yoke, and coloured rice is thrown on to their heads, and the
bridegroom ties the mangalya or bead necklace, which is the sign of
marriage, round the neck of the bride. If a girl is deformed, or has some

Page 252

other drawback which prevents her from being sought in marriage, she is
given away with her sister to a first cousin3 or some other near relative, the
two sisters being married to him together. A widow may marry any man of
the tribe except her first husband’s brothers. If a man takes a widow to his
house without marrying her he is fined three rupees, while for adultery with
a married woman the penalty is twenty rupees. A divorce can always be
obtained, but if the husband demands it he is mulcted of twenty rupees by
the caste committee, while a wife who seeks a divorce must pay ten rupees.
The Mannewārs make an offering of a fowl and some liquor to the
ploughshare on the festival of Ganesh Chaturthi. After the picking of the
flowers of the mahua4 they worship that tree, offering to it some of the liquor
distilled from the new flowers, with a fowl and a goat. This is known as the
Burri festival. At the Holi feast the Mannewārs make two human figures to
represent Kāmi and Rati, or the god of love and his wife. The male figure is
then thrown on to the Holi fire with a live chicken or an egg. This may be a
reminiscence of a former human sacrifice, which was a common custom in
many parts of the world at the spring festival. The caste usually bury the
dead, but are beginning to adopt cremation. They do not employ Brāhmans
for their ceremonies and eat all kinds of food, including the flesh of pigs,
fowls and crocodiles, but in view of their having nominally adopted
Hinduism, they abstain from beef.

1 This article is based on a note furnished by Mr. M. Aziz, Officiating Nāib-Tahsīldār, Sironcha.
2 From a glossary published by Mr. Gupta, Assistant Director of Ethnology for India.

3 Generally the paternal aunt’s son.
4 Bassia latifolia.

Page 253

Marātha
List of Paragraphs

1. Numerical statistics
2. Double meaning of the term Marātha
3. Origin and position of the caste
4. Exogamous clans
5. Other subdivisions
6. Social customs
7. Religion
8. Present position of the caste
9. Nature of the Marātha insurrection
10. Marātha women in past times
11. The Marātha horseman
12. Cavalry in the field
13. Military administration
14. Sitting Dharna
15. The infantry
16. Character of the Marātha armies

1. Numerical statistics

Marātha, Mahrātta.—The military caste of southern India which manned
the armies of Sivaji, and of the Peshwa and other princes of the Marātha
confederacy. In the Central Provinces the Marāthas numbered 34,000
persons in 1911, of whom Nāgpur contained 9000 and Wardha 8000, while
the remainder were distributed over Raipur, Hoshangābād and Nimār. In
Berār their strength was 60,000 persons, the total for the combined province

Page 254

being thus 94,000. The caste is found in large numbers in Bombay and
Hyderābād, and in 1901 the India Census tables show a total of not less than
five million persons belonging to it.

2. Double meaning of the term Marātha

It is difficult to avoid confusion in the use of the term Marātha, which
signifies both an inhabitant of the area in which the Marāthi language is
spoken, and a member of the caste to which the general name has in view of
their historical importance been specifically applied. The native name for the
Marāthi-speaking country is Mahārāshtra, which has been variously
interpreted as ‘The great country’ or ‘The country of the Mahārs.’1 A third
explanation of the name is from the Rāshtrakūta dynasty which was
dominant in this area for some centuries after A.D. 750. The name
Rāshtrakūta was contracted into Rattha, and with the prefix of Mahā or
Great might evolve into the term Marātha. The Rāshtrakūtas have been
conjecturally identified with the Rāthor Rājpūts. The Nāsik Gazetteer2 states
that in 246 B.C. Mahāratta is mentioned as one of the places to which Asoka
sent an embassy, and Mahārashtraka is recorded in a Chālukyan inscription
of A.D. 580 as including three provinces and 99,000 villages. Several other
references are given in Sir J. Campbell’s erudite note, and the name is
therefore without doubt ancient. But the Marāthas as a people do not seem to
be mentioned before the thirteenth or fourteenth century.3 The antiquity of
the name would appear to militate against the derivation from the
Rāshtrakūta dynasty, which did not become prominent till much later, and
the most probable meaning of Mahārāshtra would therefore seem to be ‘The
country of the Mahārs.’ Mahāratta and Marātha are presumably derivatives
from Mahārāshtra.

Page 255

3. Origin and position of the caste

The Marāthas are a caste formed from military service, and it seems
probable that they sprang mainly from the peasant population of Kunbis,
though at what period they were formed into a separate caste has not yet
been determined. Grant-Duff mentions several of their leading families as
holding offices under the Muhammadan rulers of Bījapur and Ahmadnagar
in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, as the Nimbhālkar, Ghārpure and
Bhonsla;4 and presumably their clansmen served in the armies of those
states. But whether or no the designation of Marātha had been previously
used by them, it first became prominent during the period of Sivaji’s guerilla
warfare against Aurāngzeb. The Marāthas claim a Rājpūt origin, and several
of their clans have the names of Rājpūt tribes, as Chauhān, Panwār, Solanki
and Suryavansi. In 1836 Mr. Enthoven states,5 the Sesodia Rāna of Udaipur,
the head of the purest Rājpūt house, was satisfied from inquiries conducted
by an agent that the Bhonslas and certain other families had a right to be
recognised as Rājpūts. Colonel Tod states that Sivaji was descended from a
Rājpūt prince Sujunsi, who was expelled from Mewār to avoid a dispute
about the succession about A.D. 1300. Sivaji is shown as 13th in descent
from Sujunsi. Similarly the Bhonslas of Nāgpur were said to derive their
origin from one Bunbir, who was expelled from Udaipur about 1541, having
attempted to usurp the kingdom.6 As Rājpūt dynasties ruled in the Deccan
for some centuries before the Muhammadan conquest, it seems reasonable to
suppose that a Rājpūt aristocracy may have taken root there. This was
Colonel Tod’s opinion, who wrote: “These kingdoms of the south as well as
the north were held by Rājpūt sovereigns, whose offspring, blending with
the original population, produced that mixed race of Marāthas inheriting
with the names the warlike propensities of their ancestors, but who assume
the names of their abodes as titles, as the Nimalkars, the Phalkias, the
Patunkars, instead of their tribes of Jādon, Tüār, Püār, etc.”7 This statement
would, however, apply only to the leading houses and not to the bulk of the
Marātha caste, who appear to be mainly derived from the Kunbis. In

Page 256

Sholāpur the Marāthas and Kunbis eat together, and the Kunbis are said to
be bastard Marāthas.8 In Satāra the Kunbis have the same division into 96
clans as the Marāthas have, and many of the same surnames.9 The writer of
the Satara Gazetteer says:10 “The census of 1851 included the Marāthas
with the Kunbis, from whom they do not form a separate caste. Some
Marātha families may have a larger strain of northern or Rājpūt blood than
the Kunbis, but this is not always the case. The distinction between Kunbis
and Marāthas is almost entirely social, the Marāthas as a rule being better
off, and preferring even service as a constable or messenger to husbandry.”
Exactly the same state of affairs prevails in the Central Provinces and Berār,
where the body of the caste are commonly known as Marātha Kunbis. In
Bombay the Marāthas will take daughters from the Kunbis in marriage for
their sons, though they will not give their daughters in return. But a Kunbi
who has got on in the world and become wealthy may by sufficient payment
get his sons married into Marātha families, and even be adopted as a member
of the caste.11 In 1798 Colonel Tone, who commanded a regiment of the
Peshwa’s army, wrote12 of the Marāthas: “The three great tribes which
compose the Marātha caste are the Kunbi or farmer, the Dhangar or
shepherd, and the Goāla or cowherd; to this original cause may perhaps be
ascribed that great simplicity of manner which distinguishes the Marātha
people.”

Page 257

Statue of Marātha leader, Bīmbāji Bhonsla, in armour

It seems then most probable that, as already stated, the Marātha caste was of
purely military origin, constituted from the various castes of Mahārāshtra
who adopted military service, though some of the leading families may have
had Rājpūts for their ancestors. Sir D. Ibbetson thought that a similar relation

Page 258

existed in past times between the Rājpūts and Jāts, the landed aristocracy of
the Jāt caste being gradually admitted to Rājpūt rank. The Khandaits or
swordsmen of Orissa are a caste formed in the same manner from military
service. In the Imperial Gazetteer Sir H. Risley suggests that the Marātha
people were of Scythian origin:

“The physical type of the people of this region accords fairly well with this
theory, while the arguments derived from language and religion do not seem
to conflict with it.... On this view the wide-ranging forays of the Marāthas,
their guerilla methods of warfare, their unscrupulous dealings with friend
and foe, their genius for intrigue and their consequent failure to build up an
enduring dominion, might well be regarded as inherited from their Scythian
ancestors.”

4. Exogamous clans

In the Central Provinces the Marāthas are divided into 96 exogamous clans,
known as the Chhānava Kule, which marry with one another. During the
period when the Bhonsla family were rulers of Nāgpur they constituted a
sort of inner circle, consisting of seven of the leading clans, with whom
alone they intermarried; these are known as the Sātghare or Seven Houses,
and consist of the Bhonsla, Gūjar, Ahirrao, Mahādik, Sirke, Palke and Mohte
clans. These houses at one time formed an endogamous group, marrying
only among themselves, but recently the restriction has been relaxed, and
they have arranged marriages with other Marātha families. It may be noted
that the present representatives of the Bhonsla family are of the Gūjar clan to
which the last Rāja of Nāgpur, Raghūji III., belonged prior to his adoption.
Several of the clans, as already noted, have Rājpūt sept names; and some are
considered to be derived from those of former ruling dynasties; as Chālke,
from the Chālukya Rājpūt kings of the Deccan and Carnatic; More, who may
represent a branch of the great Maurya dynasty of northern India; Sālunke,
perhaps derived from the Solanki kings of Gujarāt; and Yādav, the name of
the kings of Deogiri or Daulatābād.13 Others appear to be named after

Page 259

animals or natural objects, as Sinde from sindi the date-palm tree, Ghorpade
from ghorpad the iguana; or to be of a titular nature, as Kāle black, Pāndhre
white, Bhāgore a renegade, Jagthāp renowned, and so on. The More,
Nimbhālkar, Ghātge, Māne, Ghorpade, Dafle, Jādav and Bhonsla clans are
the oldest, and held prominent positions in the old Muhammadan kingdoms
of Bījapur and Ahmadnagar. The Nimbhālkar family were formerly Panwār
Rājpūts, and took the name of Nimbhālkar from their ancestral village
Nimbālik. The Ghorpade family are an offshoot of the Bhonslas, and
obtained their present name from the exploit of one of their ancestors, who
scaled a fort in the Konkan, previously deemed impregnable, by passing a
cord round the body of a ghorpad or iguana.14 A noticeable trait of these
Marātha houses is the fondness with which they clung to the small estates or
villages in the Deccan in which they had originally held the office of a patel
or village headman as a watan or hereditary right, even after they had carved
out for themselves principalities and states in other parts of India. The
present Bhonsla Rāja takes his title from the village of Deor in the Poona
country. In former times we read of the Rāja of Satāra clinging to the watans
he had inherited from Sivaji after he had lost his crown in all but the name;
Sindhia was always termed patel or village headman in the revenue accounts
of the villages he acquired in Nimār; while it is said that Holkar and the
Panwār of Dhār fought desperately after the British conquest to recover the
pateli rights of Deccan villages which had belonged to their ancestors.15

5. Other subdivisions

Besides the 96 clans there are now in the Central Provinces some local
subcastes who occupy a lower position and do not intermarry with the
Marāthas proper. Among these are the Deshkar or ‘Residents of the country’;
the Waindesha or those of Berār and Khāndesh; the Gangthade or those
dwelling on the banks of the Godāvari and Wainganga; and the Ghātmāthe
or residents of the Mahādeo plateau in Berār. It is also stated that the
Marāthas are divided into the Khāsi or ‘pure’ and the Kharchi or the
descendants of handmaids. In Bombay the latter are known as the

Page 260

Akarmāshes or 11 māshas, meaning that as twelve māshas make a tola, a
twelfth part of them is alloy.

6. Social customs

A man must not marry in his own clan or that of his mother. A sister’s son
may be married to a brother’s daughter, but not vice versa. Girls are
commonly married between five and twelve years of age, and the ceremony
resembles that of the Kunbis. The bridegroom goes to the bride’s house
riding on horseback and covered with a black blanket When a girl first
becomes mature, usually after marriage, the Marathas perform the Shāntik
ceremony. The girl is secluded for four days, after which she is bathed and
puts on new clothes and dresses her hair and a feast is given to the caste-
fellows. Sometimes the bridegroom comes and is asked whether he has
visited his wife before she became mature, and if he confesses that he has
done so a small fine is imposed on him. Such cases are, however, believed to
be rare. The Marāthas proper forbid widow-marriage, but the lower groups
allow it. If a maiden is seduced by one of the caste she may be married to
him as if she were a widow, a fine being imposed on her family; but if she
goes wrong with an outsider she is finally expelled. Divorce is not ostensibly
allowed but may be concluded by agreement between the parties. A wife
who commits adultery is cast off and expelled from the caste. The caste burn
their dead when they can afford it and perform the shrāddh ceremony in the
month of Kunwār (September), when oblations are offered to the dead and a
feast is given to the caste-fellows. Sometimes a tomb is erected as a
memorial to the dead, but without his name, and is surmounted usually by an
image of Mahādeo. The caste eat the flesh of clean animals and of fowls and
wild pig, and drink liquor. Their rules about food are liberal like those of the
Rājpūts, a too great stringency being no doubt in both cases incompatible
with the exigencies of military service. They make no difference between
food cooked with or without water, and will accept either from a Brāhman,
Rājpūt, Tirole Kunbi, Lingāyat Bania or Phūlmāli.

Page 261

The Marāthas proper observe the parda system with regard to their women,
and will go to the well and draw water themselves rather than permit their
wives to do so. The women wear ornaments only of gold or glass and not of
silver or any baser metal. They are not permitted to spin cotton as being an
occupation of the lower classes. The women are tattooed in the centre of the
forehead with a device resembling a trident. The men commonly wear a
turban made of many folds of cloth twisted into a narrow rope and large gold
rings with pearls in the upper part of the ear. Like the Rājpūts they often
have their hair long and wear beards and whiskers. They assume the sacred
thread and invest a boy with it when he is seven or eight years old or on his
marriage. Till then they let the hair grow on the front of his head, and when
the thread ceremony is performed they cut this off and let the choti or scalp-
lock grow at the back. In appearance the men are often tall and well-built
and of a light wheat-coloured complexion.

7. Religion

The principal deity of the Marāthas is Khandoba, a warrior incarnation of
Mahādeo. He is supposed to have been born in a field of millet near Poona
and to have led the people against the Muhammadans in early times. He had
a watch-dog who warned him of the approach of his enemies, and he is
named after the khanda or sword which he always carried. In Bombay16 he
is represented on horseback with two women, one of the Bania caste, his
wedded wife, in front of him, and another, a Dhangarin, his kept mistress,
behind. He is considered the tutelary deity of the Marātha country, and his
symbol is a bag of turmeric powder known as bhandār. The caste worship
Khandoba on Sundays with rice, flowers and incense, and also on the 21st
day of Māgh (January), which is called Champa Sashthi and is his special
festival. On this day they will catch hold of any dog, and after adorning him
with flowers and turmeric give him a good feed and let him go again. The
Marāthas are generally kind to dogs and will not injure them. At the Dasahra
festival the caste worship their horses and swords and go out into the field to
see a blue-jay in memory of the fact that the Marātha marauding expeditions

Page 262

started on Dasahra. On coming back they distribute to each other leaves of
the shami tree (Bauhinia racemosa) as a substitute for gold. It was formerly
held to be fitting among the Hindus that the warrior should ride a horse
(geldings being unknown) and the zamīndār or landowner a mare, as more
suitable to a man of peace. The warriors celebrated their Dasahra, and
worshipped their horses on the tenth day of the light fortnight of Kunwār
(September), while the cultivators held their festival and worshipped their
mares on the ninth day. It is recorded that the great Rāghuji Bhonsla, the first
Rāja of Nāgpur, held his Dasahra on the ninth day, in order to proclaim the
fact that he was by family an agriculturist and only incidentally a man of
arms.17

8. Present position of the caste

The Marāthas present the somewhat melancholy spectacle of an
impoverished aristocratic class attempting to maintain some semblance of
their former position, though they no longer have the means to do so. They
flourished during two or three centuries of almost continuous war, and
became a wealthy and powerful caste, but they find a difficulty in turning
their hands to the arts of peace. Sir R. Craddock writes of them in Nāgpur:

“Among the Marāthas a large number represent connections of the Bhonsla
family, related by marriage or by illegitimate descent to that house. A
considerable proportion of the Government political pensioners are
Marāthas. Many of them own villages or hold tenant land, but as a rule they
are extravagant in their living; and several of the old Marātha nobility have
fallen very much in the world. Pensions diminish with each generation, but
the expenditure shows no corresponding decrease. The sons are brought up
to no employment and the daughters are married with lavish pomp and show.
The native army does not much attract them, and but few are educated well
enough for the dignified posts in the civil employ of Government. It is a
question whether their pride of race will give way before the necessity of
earning their livelihood soon enough for them to maintain or regain some of

Page 263

their former position. Otherwise those with the largest landed estates may be
saved by the intervention of Government, but the rest must gradually
deteriorate till the dignities of their class have become a mere memory. The
humbler members of the caste find their employment as petty contractors or
traders, private servants, Government peons, sowārs and hangers-on in the
retinue of the more important families.

“What18 little display his means afford a Marātha still tries to maintain.
Though he may be clad in rags at home, he has a spare dress which he
himself washes and keeps with great care and puts on when he goes to pay a
visit. He will hire a boy to attend him with a lantern at night, or to take care
of his shoes when he goes to a friend’s house and hold them before him
when he comes out. Well-to-do Marāthas have usually in their service a
Brāhman clerk known as divānji or minister, who often takes advantage of
his master’s want of education to defraud him. A Marātha seldom rises early
or goes out in the morning. He will get up at seven or eight o’clock, a late
hour for a Hindu, and attend to business if he has any or simply idle about
chewing or smoking tobacco and talking till ten o’clock. He will then bathe
and dress in a freshly-washed cloth and bow before the family gods which
the priest has already worshipped. He will dine, chew betel and smoke
tobacco and enjoy a short midday rest. Rising at three, he will play cards,
dice or chess, and in the evening will go out walking or riding or pay a visit
to a friend. He will come back at eight or nine and go to bed at ten or eleven.
But Marāthas who have estates to manage lead regular, fairly busy lives.”

9. Nature of the Marātha insurrection

Sir D. Ibbetson drew attention to the fact that the rising of the Marāthas
against the Muhammadans was almost the only instance in Indian history of
what might correctly be called a really national movement. In other cases, as
that of the Sikhs, though the essential motive was perhaps of the same
nature, it was obscured by the fact that its ostensible tendency was religious.
The gurus of the Sikhs did not call on their followers to fight for their

Page 264

country but for a new religion. This was only in accordance with the Hindu
intellect, to which the idea of nationality has hitherto been foreign, while its
protests against both alien and domestic tyrannies tend to take the shape of a
religious revolt. A similar tendency is observable even in the case of the
Marāthas, for the rising was from its inception largely engineered by the
Marātha Brāhmans, who on its success hastened to annex for themselves a
leading position in the new Poona state. And it has been recorded that in
calling his countrymen to arms, Sivaji did not ask them to defend their
hearths and homes or wives and children, but to rally for the protection of
the sacred persons of Brāhmans and cows.

10. Marātha women in past times

Although the Marāthas have now in imitation of the Rājpūts and
Muhammadans adopted the parda system, this is not a native custom, and
women have played quite an important part in their history. The women of
the household have also exercised a considerable influence and their
opinions are treated with respect by the men. Several instances occur in
which women of high rank have successfully acted as governors and
administrators. In the Bhonsla family the Princess Bāka Bāi, widow of
Raghūji II., is a conspicuous instance, while the famous or notorious Rāni of
Jhānsi is another case of a Marātha lady who led her troops in person, and
was called the best man on the native side in the Mutiny.

11. The Marātha horseman

This article may conclude with one or two extracts to give an idea of the way
in which the Marātha soldiery took the field. Grant Duff describes the
troopers as follows:

Page 265

“The Marātha horsemen are commonly dressed in a pair of light breeches
covering the knee, a turban which many of them fasten by passing a fold of
it under the chin, a frock of quilted cotton, and a cloth round the waist, with
which they generally gird on their swords in preference to securing them
with their belts. The horseman is armed with a sword and shield; a
proportion in each body carry matchlocks, but the great national weapon is
the spear, in the use of which and the management of their horse they evince
both grace and dexterity. The spearmen have generally a sword, and
sometimes a shield; but the latter is unwieldy and only carried in case the
spear should be broken. The trained spearmen may always be known by
their riding very long, the ball of the toe touching the stirrup; some of the
matchlockmen and most of the Brāhmans ride very short and ungracefully.
The bridle consists of a single headstall of cotton-rope, with a small but very
severe flexible bit”

12. Cavalry in the field

The following account of the Marātha cavalry is given in General Hislop’s
Summary of the Marātha and Pindāri Campaigns of 1817–1819:

“The Marāthas possess extraordinary skill in horsemanship, and so intimate
an acquaintance with their horses, that they can make their animals do
anything, even in full speed, in halting, wheeling, etc.; they likewise use the
spear with remarkable dexterity, sometimes in full gallop, grasping their
spears short and quickly sticking the point in the ground; still holding the
handles, they turn their horse suddenly round it, thus performing on the point
of a spear as on a pivot the same circle round and round again. Their horses
likewise never leave the particular class or body to which they belong; so
that if the rider should be knocked off, away gallops the animal after its
fellows, never separating itself from the main body. Every Marātha brings
his own horse and his own arms with him to the field, and possibly in the
interest they possess in this private equipment we shall find their usual
shyness to expose themselves or even to make a bold vigorous attack. But if

Page 266

armies or troops could be frightened by appearances these horses of the
Marāthas would dishearten the bravest, actually darkening the plains with
their numbers and clouding the horizon with dust for miles and miles
around. A little fighting, however, goes a great way with them, as with most
others of the native powers in India.”

On this account the Marāthas were called razāh-bazān or lance-wielders.
One Muhammadan historian says: “They so use the lance that no cavalry can
cope with them. Some 20,000 or 30,000 lances are held up against their
enemy so close together as not to leave a span between their heads. If
horsemen try to ride them down the points of the spears are levelled at the
assailants and they are unhorsed. While cavalry are charging them they
strike their lances against each other and the noise so frightens the horses of
the enemy that they turn round and bolt.”19 The battle-cries of the Marāthas
were, ‘Har, Har Mahādeo,’ and ‘Gopāl, Gopāl.’20

13. Military administration

An interesting description of the internal administration of the Marātha
cavalry is contained in the letter on the Marāthas by Colonel Tone already
quoted. But his account must refer to a period of declining efficiency and
cannot represent the military system at its best:

“In the great scale of rank and eminence which is one peculiar feature of
Hindu institutions the Marātha holds a very inferior situation, being just
removed one degree above those castes which are considered absolutely
unclean. He is happily free from the rigorous observances as regards food
which fetter the actions of the higher castes. He can eat of all kinds of food
with the exception of beef; can dress his meal at all times and seasons; can
partake of all victuals dressed by any caste superior to his own; washing and
praying are not indispensable in his order and may be practised or omitted at
pleasure. The three great tribes which compose the Marātha caste are the
Kunbi or farmer, the Dhangar or shepherd and the Goāla or cowherd; to this

Page 267

original cause may perhaps be ascribed that great simplicity of manner
which distinguishes the Marātha people. Homer mentions princesses going
in person to the fountain to wash their household linen. I can affirm having
seen the daughters of a prince who was able to bring an army into the field
much larger than the whole Greek confederacy, making bread with their own
hands and otherwise employed in the ordinary business of domestic
housewifery. I have seen one of the most powerful chiefs of the Empire,
after a day of action, assisting in kindling a fire to keep himself warm during
the night, and sitting on the ground on a spread saddle-cloth dictating to his
secretaries.

“The chief military force of the Marāthas consists in their cavalry, which
may be divided into four distinct classes: First the Khāsi Pagah or household
forces of the prince; these are always a fine well-appointed body, the horses
excellent, being the property of the Sirkār, who gives a monthly allowance to
each trooper of the value of about eight rupees. The second class are the
cavalry furnished by the Sillādārs,21 who contract to supply a certain number
of horse on specified terms, generally about Rs. 35 a month, including the
trooper’s pay. The third and most numerous description are volunteers, who
join the camp bringing with them their own horse and accoutrements; their
pay is generally from Rs. 40 to Rs. 50 a month in proportion to the value of
their horse. There is a fourth kind of native cavalry called Pindāris, who are
mere marauders, serve without any pay and subsist but by plunder, a fourth
part of which they give to the Sirkār; but these are so very licentious a body
that they are not employed but in one or two of the Marātha services.

“The troops collected in this manner are under no discipline whatever and
engage for no specific period, but quit the army whenever they please; with
the exception of furnishing a picquet while in camp, they do no duty but in
the day of battle.

“The Marātha cavalry is always irregularly and badly paid; the household
troops scarcely ever receive money, but are furnished with a daily allowance
of coarse flour and some other ingredients from the bazār which just enable
them to exist. The Sillādār is very nearly as badly situated. In his
arrangements with the State he has allotted to him a certain proportion of

Page 268

jungle where he pastures his cattle; here he and his family reside, and his
sole occupation when not on actual service is increasing his Pagah or troop
by breeding out of his mares, of which the Marātha cavalry almost entirely
consist. There are no people in the world who understand the method of
rearing and multiplying the breed of cattle equal to the Marāthas. It is by no
means uncommon for a Sillādār to enter a service with one mare and in a
few years be able to muster a very respectable Pagah. They have many
methods of rendering the animal prolific; they back their colts much earlier
than we do and they are consequently more valuable as they come sooner on
the effective strength.

“When called upon for actual service the Sillādār is obliged to give muster.
Upon this occasion it is always necessary that the Brāhman who takes it
should have a bribe; and indeed the Hāzri, as the muster is termed, is of such
a nature that it could not pass by any fair or honourable means. Not only any
despicable tattus are substituted in the place of horses but animals are
borrowed to fill up the complement. Heel-ropes and grain-bags are produced
as belonging to cattle supposed to be at grass; in short every mode is
practised to impose on the Sirkār, which in turn reimburses itself by irregular
and bad payments; for it is always considered if the Sillādārs receive six
months’ arrears out of the year that they are exceedingly well paid. The
Volunteers who join the camp are still worse situated, as they have no
collective force, and money is very seldom given in a Marātha State without
being extorted. In one word, the native cavalry are the worst-paid body of
troops in the world. But there is another grand error in this mode of raising
troops which is productive of the worst effects. Every man in a Marātha
camp is totally independent; he is the proprietor of the horse he rides, which
he is never inclined to risk, since without it he can get no service. This single
circumstance destroys all enterprise and spirit in the soldier, whose sole
business, instead of being desirous of distinguishing himself, is to keep out
of the way of danger; for notwithstanding every horseman on entering a
service has a certain value put upon his horse, yet should he lose it even in
action he never receives any compensation or at least none proportioned to
his loss. If at any time a Sillādār is disgusted with the service he can go away
without meeting any molestation even though in the face of an enemy. In
fact the pay is in general so shamefully irregular that a man is justified in

Page 269

resorting to any measure, however apparently unbecoming, to attain it. It is
also another very curious circumstance attending this service that many great
Sillādārs have troops in the pay of two or three chiefs at the same time, who
are frequently at open war with each other.

14. Sitting Dharna

“To recover an arrear of pay there is but one known mode which is
universally adopted in all native services, the Mughal as well as the Marātha;
this is called Dharna,22 which consists in putting the debtor, be he who he
will, into a state of restraint or imprisonment, until satisfaction be given or
the money actually obtained. Any person in the Sirkār’s service has a right to
demand his pay of the Prince or his minister, and to sit in Dharna if it be not
given; nor will he meet with the least hindrance in doing so; for none would
obey an order that interfered with the Dharna, as it is a common cause; nor
does the soldier incur the slightest charge of mutiny for his conduct, or suffer
in the smallest manner in the opinion of his Chief, so universal is the custom.
The Dharna is sometimes carried to very violent lengths and may either be
executed on the Prince or his minister indifferently, with the same effect; as
the Chief always makes it a point of honour not to eat or drink while his
Diwān is in duress; sometimes the Dharna lasts for many days, during which
time the party upon whom it is exercised is not suffered to eat or drink or
wash or pray, or in short is not permitted to move from the spot where he
sits, which is frequently bare-headed in the sun, until the money or security
be given; so general is this mode of recovery that I suppose the Marātha
Chiefs may be said to be nearly one-half of their time in a state of Dharna.

15. The infantry

Page 270

“In the various Marātha services there are very little more than a bare
majority who are Marāthas by caste, and very few instances occur of their
ever entering into the infantry at all. The sepoys in the pay of the different
princes are recruited in Hindustān, and principally of the Rājpūt and Pūrbia
caste; these are perhaps the finest race of men in the world for figure and
appearance; of lofty stature, strong, graceful and athletic; of acute feelings,
high military pride, quick, apprehensive, brave, prudent and economic; at the
same time it must be confessed they are impatient of discipline, and
naturally inclined to mutiny. They are mere soldiers of fortune and serve
only for their pay. There are also a great number of Musalmāns who serve in
the different Marātha armies, some of whom have very great commands.

16. Character of the Marātha armies

“The Marātha cavalry at times make very long and rapid marches, in which
they do not suffer themselves to be interrupted by the monsoon or any
violence of weather. In very pressing exigencies it is incredible the fatigue a
Marātha horseman will endure; frequently many days pass without his
enjoying one regular meal, but he depends entirely for subsistence on the
different corn-fields through which the army passes: a few heads of juāri,
which he chafes in his hands while on horseback, will serve him for the day;
his horse subsists on the same fare, and with the addition of opium, which
the Marāthas frequently administer to their cattle, is enabled to perform
incredible marches.”

The above analysis of the Marātha troops indicates that their real character
was that of freebooting cavalry, largely of the same type as, though no doubt
greatly superior in tone and discipline to the Pindāris. Like them they lived
by plundering the country. “The Marāthas,” Elphinstone remarked, “are
excellent foragers. Every morning at daybreak long lines of men on small
horses and ponies are seen issuing from their camps in all directions, who
return before night loaded with fodder for the cattle, with firewood torn
down from houses, and grain dug up from the pits where it had been

Page 271

concealed by the villagers; while other detachments go to a distance for
some days and collect proportionately larger supplies of the same kind.”23
They could thus dispense with a commissariat, and being nearly all mounted
were able to make extraordinarily long marches, and consequently to carry
out effectively surprise attacks and when repulsed to escape injury in the
retreat. Even at Pānīpat where their largest regular force took the field under
Sadāsheo Rao Bhao, he had 70,000 regular and irregular cavalry and only
15,000 infantry, of whom 9000 were hired sepoys under a Muhammadan
leader. The Marāthas were at their best in attacking the slow-moving and
effeminate Mughal armies, while during their period of national ascendancy
under the Peshwa there was no strong military power in India which could
oppose their forays. When they were by the skill of their opponents at length
brought to a set battle, their fighting qualities usually proved to be distinctly
poor. At Pānīpat they lost the day by a sudden panic and flight after Ibrahīm
Khān Gārdi had obtained for them a decided advantage; while at Argaon and
Assaye their performances were contemptible. After the recovery from
Pānīpat and the rise of the independent Marātha states, the assistance of
European officers was invoked to discipline and train the soldiery.24

1 Sir H. Risley’s India Census Report (1901), Ethnographic Appendices, p. 93.
2 P. 48, footnote.

3 Nāsik Gazetteer, ibidem. Elphinstone’s History, p. 246.
4 The proper spelling is Bhosle, but Bhonsla is adopted in deference to established usage.

5 Bombay Census Report (1901), pp. 184–185.
6 Rājasthān, i. 269.

7 Ibidem, ii. 420.
8 Sholapur Gazetteer, p. 87.

9 Satāra Gazetteer, p. 64.
10 Ibidem, p. 75.

11 Bombay Census Report (1907), ibidem.
12 Letter on the Marāthas (India Office Tracts).

13 Satāra Gazetteer, p. 75.

Page 272

14 Grant-Duff, 4th edition (1878), vol. i. pp. 70–72.

15 Forsyth, Nimār Settlement Report.
16 Bombay Gazetteer, vol. xviii. part i. pp. 413–414.

17 Elliott, Hoshangābād Settlement Report.
18 The following description is taken from the Ethnographic Appendices to Sir H.H. Risley’s India
Census Report of 1901.

19 Irvine’s Army of the Mughals, p. 82.
20 Ibidem, p. 232. Gopāl is a name of Krishna.
21 Lit. armour-bearers. Colonel Tone writes: “I apprehend from the meaning of this term that it was
formerly the custom of this nation, as was the case in Europe, to appear in armour. I have
frequently seen a kind of coat-of-mail worn by the Marātha horsemen, known as a beuta, which
resembles our ancient hauberk; it is made of chain work, interlinked throughout, fits close to the body
and adapts itself to all its motions.”
22 In order to obtain redress by Dharna the creditor or injured person would sit starving himself
outside his debtor’s door, and if he died the latter would be held to have committed a mortal sin
and would be haunted by his ghost; see also article on Bhāt. The account here given must be
exaggerated.

23 Elphinstone’s History, 7th ed. p. 748.
24 Ibidem, p. 753.

Page 273

Page 274

Mehtar
[Bibliography: Mr. R. Greeven’s Knights of the Broom, Benāres 1894
(pamphlet); Mr. Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, art. Bhangi; Sir H. Risley’s
Tribes and Castes, art. Hari; Sir E. Maclagan’s Punjab Census Report, 1891
(Sweeper Sects); Sir D. Ibbetson’s Punjab Census Report, 1881 (art.
Chuhra); Bombay Gazetteer, Hindus of Gujarāt, Mr. Bhimbhai Kirparam.]

List of Paragraphs

1. Introductory notice
2. Caste subdivisions
3. Social organisation
4. Caste punishments
5. Admission of outsiders
6. Marriage customs
7. Disposal of the dead
8. Devices for procuring children
9. Divination of sex
10. Childbirth
11. Treatment of the mother
12. Protecting the lives of children
13. Infantile diseases
14. Religion. Vālmīki
15. Lālbeg
16. Adoption of foreign religions
17. Social status
18. Occupation
19. Occupation (continued)

Page 275

1. Introductory notice

Mehtar, Bhangi, Hari,1 Dom, Lālbegi.—The caste of sweepers and
scavengers. In 1911 persons returning themselves as Mehtar, Bhangi and
Dom were separately classified, and the total of all three was only 30,000. In
this Province they generally confine themselves to their hereditary
occupation of scavenging, and are rarely met with outside the towns and
large villages. In most localities the supply of sweepers does not meet the
demand. The case is quite different in northern India, where the sweeper
castes—the Chuhra in the Punjab, the Bhangi in the United Provinces and
the Dom in Bengal—are all of them of great numerical strength. With these
castes only a small proportion are employed on scavengers’ work and the
rest are labourers like the Chamārs and Mahārs of the Central Provinces. The
present sweeper caste is made up of diverse elements, and the name Mehtar,
generally applied to it, is a title meaning a prince or leader. Its application to
the caste, the most abject and despised in the Hindu community, is perhaps
partly ironical; but all the low castes have honorific titles, which are used as
a method of address either from ordinary politeness or by those requiring
some service, on the principle, as the Hindus say, that you may call an ass
your uncle if you want him to do something for you. The regular caste of
sweepers in northern India are the Bhangis, whose name is derived by Mr.
Crooke from the Sanskrit bhanga, hemp, in allusion to the drunken habits of
the caste. In support of this derivation he advances the Beria custom of
calling their leaders Bhangi or hemp-drinker as a title of honour.2 In Mr.
Greeven’s account also, Lālbeg, the patron saint of the sweepers, is
described as intoxicated with the hemp drug on two occasions.3 Mr.
Bhīmbhai Kirpārām suggests4 that Bhangia means broken, and is applied to
the sweepers because they split bamboos. In Kaira, he states, the regular
trade of the Bhangias is the plaiting of baskets and other articles of split
bamboo, and in that part of Gujarāt if a Koli is asked to split a bamboo he
will say, ‘Am I to do Bhangia’s work?’ The derivation from the hemp-plant
is, however, the more probable. In the Punjab, sweepers are known as

Page 276

Chuhra, and this, name has been derived from their business of collecting
and sweeping up scraps (chūra-jhārna) Similarly, in Bombay they are
known as Olganas or scrap-eaters. The Bengal name Hāri is supposed to
come from haddi, a bone; the Hāri is the bone-gatherer, and was familiar to
early settlers of Calcutta under the quaint designation of the ‘harry-wench,’5
In the Central Provinces sections of the Ghasia, Mahār and Dom castes will
do sweepers’ work, and are therefore amalgamated with the Mehtars. The
caste is thus of mixed constitution, and also forms a refuge for persons
expelled from their own societies for social offences. But though called by
different names, the sweeper community in most provinces appears to have
the same stock of traditions and legends. The name of Mehtar is now
generally employed, and has therefore been taken as the designation of the
caste.

2. Caste subdivisions

Mr. Greeven gives seven main subdivisions, of which the Lālbegis or the
followers of Lālbeg, the patron saint of sweepers, are the most important.
The Rāwats appear to be an aristocratic subdivision of the Lālbegis, their
name being a corruption of the Sanskrit Rājpūtra, a prince. The Shaikh
Mehtars are the only real Muhammadan branch, for though the Lālbegis
worship a Musalmān saint they remain Hindus. The Hāris or bone-gatherers,
as already stated, are the sweepers of Bengal. The Helas may either be those
who carry baskets of sweepings, or may derive their name from hela, a cry;
and in that case they are so called as performing the office of town-criers, a
function which the Bhangi usually still discharges in northern India6. The
other subcastes in his list are the Dhānuks or bowmen and the Bānsphors or
cleavers of bamboos. In the Central Provinces the Shaikh Mehtars belong
principally to Nāgpur, and another subcaste, the Makhia, is also found in the
Marātha Districts and in Berar; those branches of the Ghasia and Dom castes
who consent to do scavengers’ work now form separate subcastes of Mehtars
in the same locality, and another group are called Narnolia, being said to
take their name from a place called Narnol in the Punjab. The Lālbegis are

Page 277

often considered here as Muhammadans rather than Hindus, and bury their
dead. In Saugor the sweepers are said to be divided into Lālbegis or
Muhammadans and Doms or Hindus. The Lālbegi, Dom or Dumar and the
Hela are the principal subcastes of the north of the Province, and Chuhra
Mehtars are found in Chhattīsgarh. Each subcaste is divided into a number
of exogamous sections named after plants and animals.

3. Social organisation

In Benāres each subdivision, Mr. Greeven states, has an elaborate and quasi-
military organisation. Thus the Lālbegi sweepers have eight companies or
berhas, consisting of the sweepers working in different localities; these are
the Sadar, or those employed by private residents in cantonments; the Kāli
Paltan, who serve the Bengal Infantry; the Lāl Kurti, or Red-coats, who are
employed by the British Infantry; the Teshan (station), or those engaged at
the three railway stations of the town; the Shahar, or those of the city; the
Rāmnagar, taking their name from the residence of the Mahārāja of Benāres,
whom they serve; the Kothīwāl, or Bungalow men, who belong to residents
in the civil lines; and lastly the Genereli, who are the descendants of
sweepers employed at the military headquarters when Benāres was
commanded by a General of Division. This special organisation is obviously
copied from that of the garrison and is not found in other localities, but
deserves mention for its own interest. All the eight companies are
commanded by a Brigadier, the local head of the caste, whose office is now
almost hereditary; his principal duty is to give two dinners to the whole caste
on election, with sweetmeats to the value of fourteen rupees. Each company
has four officers—a Jamādār or president, a Munsif or spokesman, a
Chaudhari or treasurer and a Nāib or summoner. These offices are also
practically hereditary, if the candidate entitled by birth can afford to give a
dinner to the whole subcaste and a turban to each President of a company.
All the other members of the company are designated as Sipāhis or soldiers.
A caste dispute is first considered by the inferior officers of each company,
who report their view to the President; he confers with the other Presidents,

Page 278

and when an agreement has been reached the sentence is formally confirmed
by the Brigadier. When any dispute arises, the aggrieved party, depositing a
process-fee of a rupee and a quarter, addresses the officers of his company.
Unless the question is so trivial that it can be settled without caste
punishments, the President fixes a time and place, of which notice is given to
the messengers of the other companies; each of these receives a fee of one
and a quarter annas and informs all the Sipāhis in his company.

4. Caste punishments

Only worthy members of the caste, Mr. Greeven continues, are allowed to sit
on the tribal matting and smoke the tribal pipe (huqqa). The proceedings
begin with the outspreading (usually symbolic) of a carpet and the smoking
of a water-pipe handed in turn to each clansman. For this purpose the
members sit on the carpet in three lines, the officers in front and the private
soldiers behind. The parties and their witnesses are heard and examined, and
a decision is pronounced. The punishments imposed consist of fines,
compulsory dinners and expulsion from the caste; expulsion being inflicted
for failure to comply with an order of fine or entertainment. The formal
method of outcasting consists in seating the culprit on the ground and
drawing the tribal mat over his head, from which the turban is removed; after
this the messengers of the eight companies inflict a few taps with slippers
and birch brooms. It is alleged that unfaithful women were formerly tied
naked to trees and flogged with birch brooms, but that owing to the fatal
results that occasionally followed such punishment, as in the case of the five
kicks among Chamārs (tanners) and the scourging with the clothes line
which used to prevail among Dhobis (washer men), the caste has now found
it expedient to abandon these practices. When an outcaste is readmitted on
submission, whether by paying a fine or giving a dinner, he is seated apart
from the tribal mat and does penance by holding his ears with his hands and
confessing his offence. A new huqqa, which he supplies, is carried round by
the messenger, and a few whiffs are taken by all the officers and Sipāhis in
turn. The messenger repeats to the culprit the council’s order, and informs

Page 279

him that should he again offend his punishment will be doubled. With this
warning he hands him the water-pipe, and after smoking this the offender is
admitted to the carpet and all is forgotten in a banquet at his expense.

5. Admission of outsiders

The sweepers will freely admit outsiders into their community, and the caste
forms a refuge for persons expelled from their own societies for sexual or
moral offences. Various methods are employed for the initiation of a
neophyte; in some places he, or more frequently she, is beaten with a broom
made of wood taken from a bier, and has to give a feast to the caste; in
others a slight wound is made in his body and the blood of another sweeper
is allowed to flow on to it so that they mix; and a glass of sherbet and sugar,
known as the cup of nectar, is prepared by the priest and all the members of
the committee put their fingers into it, after which it is given to the candidate
to drink; or he has to drink water mixed with cowdung into which the caste-
people have dipped their little fingers, and a lock of his hair is cut off. Or he
fasts all day at the shrine of Lālbeg and in the evening drinks sherbet after
burning incense at the shrine; and gives three feasts, the first on the bank of a
tank, the second in his courtyard and the third in his house, representing his
gradual purification for membership; at this last he puts a little water into
every man’s cup and receives from him a piece of bread, and so becomes a
fully qualified caste-man. Owing to this reinforcement from higher castes,
and perhaps also to their flesh diet, the sweepers are not infrequently taller
and stronger as well as lighter in colour than the average Hindu.

6. Marriage customs

Page 280

The marriage ceremony in the Central Provinces follows the ordinary Hindu
ritual. The lagan or paper fixing the date of the wedding is written by a
Brāhman, who seats himself at some distance from the sweeper’s house and
composes the letter. This paper must not be seen by the bride or bridegroom,
nor may its contents be read to them, as it is believed that to do so would
cause them to fall ill during the ceremony. Before the bridegroom starts for
the wedding his mother waves a wooden pestle five times over his head,
passing it between his legs and shoulders. After this the bridegroom breaks
two lamp-saucers with his right foot, steps over the rice-pounder and departs
for the bride’s house without looking behind him. The sawāsas or relatives
of the parties usually officiate at the ceremony, but the well-to-do sometimes
engage a Brāhman, who sits at a distance from the house and calls out his
instructions. When a man wishes to marry a widow he must pay six rupees
to the caste committee and give a feast to the community. Divorce is
permitted for incompatibility of temper, or immorality on the part of the
wife, or if the husband suffers from leprosy or impotence. Among the
Lālbegis, when a man wishes to get rid of his wife he assembles the brethren
and in their presence says to her, ‘You are as my sister,’ and she answers,
‘You are as my father and brother.’7

7. Disposal of the dead

The dead are usually buried, but the well-to-do sometimes cremate them. In
Benāres the face or hand of the corpse is scorched with fire to symbolise
cremation and it is then buried. In the Punjab the ghosts of sweepers are
considered to be malevolent and are much dreaded; and their bodies are
therefore always buried or burnt face downwards to prevent the spirit
escaping; and riots have taken place and the magistrates have been appealed
to to prevent a Chuhra from being buried face upwards.8 In Benāres as the
body is lowered into the grave the sheet is withdrawn for a moment from the
features of the departed to afford him one last glimpse of the heavens, while
with Muhammadans the face is turned towards Mecca. Each clansman flings
a handful of dust over the corpse, and after the earth is filled in crumbles a

Page 281

little bread and sugar-cake and sprinkles water upon the grave. A provision
of bread, sweetmeats and water is also left upon it for the soul of the
departed.9 In the Central Provinces the body of a man is covered with a
white winding-sheet and that of a woman with a red one. If the death occurs
during the lunar conjunction known as Panchak, four human images of flour
are made and buried with the dead man, as they think that if this is not done
four more deaths will occur in the family.

8. Devices for procuring children

If a woman greatly desires a child she will go to a shrine and lay a stone on it
which she calls the dharna or deposit or pledge. Then she thinks that she has
put the god under an obligation to give her a child. She vows that if she
becomes pregnant within a certain period, six or nine months, she will make
an offering of a certain value. If the pregnancy comes she goes to the temple,
makes the offering and removes the stone. If the desired result does not
happen, however, she considers that the god has broken his obligation and
ceases to worship him. If a barren woman desires a child she should steal on
a Sunday or a Wednesday a strip from the body-cloth of a fertile woman
when it is hung out to dry; or she may steal a piece of rope from the bed in
which a woman has been delivered of a child, or a piece of the baby’s soiled
swaddling clothes or a piece of cloth stained with the blood of a fertile
woman. This last she will take and bury in a cemetery and the others wear
round her waist; then she will become fertile and the fertile woman will
become barren. Another device is to obtain from the midwife a piece of the
navel-string of a newborn child and swallow it. For this reason the navel-
string is always carefully guarded and its disposal seen to.

9. Divination of sex

Page 282

If a pregnant woman is thin and ailing they think a boy will be born; but if
fat and well that it will be a girl. In order to divine the sex of a coming child
they pour a little oil on the stomach of the woman; if the oil flows straight
down it is thought that a boy will be born and if crooked a girl. Similarly if
the hair on the front of her body grows straight they think the child will be a
boy, but if crooked a girl; and if the swelling of pregnancy is more apparent
on the right side a boy is portended, but if on the left side a girl. If delivery is
retarded they go to a gunmaker and obtain from him a gun which has been
discharged and the soiling of the barrel left uncleaned; some water is put into
the barrel and shaken up and then poured into a vessel and given to the
woman to drink, and it is thought that the quality of swift movement
appertaining to the bullet which soiled the barrel will be communicated to
the woman and cause the swift expulsion of the child from her womb.

10. Childbirth

When a woman is in labour she squats down with her legs apart holding to
the bed in front of her, while the midwife rubs her back. If delivery is
retarded the midwife gets a broom and sitting behind the woman presses it
on her stomach, at the same time drawing back the upper part of her body.
By this means they think the child will be forced from the womb. Or the
mother of the woman in labour will take a grinding-stone and stand holding
it on her head so long as the child is not born. She says to her daughter,
‘Take my name,’ and the daughter repeats her mother’s name aloud. Here the
idea is apparently that the mother takes on herself some of the pain which
has to be endured by the daughter, and the repetition of her name by the
daughter will cause the goddess of childbirth to hasten the period of delivery
in order to terminate the unjust sufferings of the mother for which the
goddess has become responsible. The mother’s name exerts pressure or
influence on the goddess who is at the time occupied with the daughter or
perhaps sojourning in her body.

Page 283

11. Treatment of the mother

If a child is born in the morning they will give the mother a little sugar and
cocoanut to eat in the evening, but if it is born in the evening they will give
her nothing till next morning. Milk is given only sparingly as it is supposed
to produce coughing. The main idea of treatment in childbirth is to prevent
either the mother or child from taking cold or chill, this being the principal
danger to which they are thought to be exposed. The door of the birth
chamber is therefore kept shut and a fire is continually burning in it night
and day. The woman is not bathed for several days, and the atmosphere and
general insanitary conditions can better be imagined than described. With the
same end of preventing cold they feed the mother on a hot liquid produced
by cooking thirty-six ingredients together. Most of these are considered to
have the quality of producing heat or warmth in the body, and the following
are a few of them: Pepper, ginger, azgan (a condiment), turmeric, nutmeg,
ajwāin (aniseed), dates, almonds, raisins, cocoanut, wild singāra or water-
nut, cumin, chironji,10 the gum of the babūl11 or khair,12 asafoetida, borax,
saffron, clarified butter and sugar. The mixture cannot be prepared for less
than two rupees and the woman is fed on it for five days beginning from the
second day after birth, if the family can afford the expense.

12. Protecting the lives of children

If the mother’s milk runs dry, they use the dried bodies of the little fish
caught in the shallow water of fields and tanks, and sometimes supposed to
have fallen down with the rain. They are boiled in a little water and the fish
and water are given to the woman to consume. Here the idea is apparently
that as the fish has the quality of liquidness because it lives in water, so by

Page 284

eating it this will be communicated to the breasts and the milk will flow
again. If a woman’s children die, then the next time she is in labour they
bring a goat all of one colour. When the birth of the child takes place and it
falls from the womb on to the ground no one must touch it, but the goat,
which should if possible be of the same sex as the child, is taken and passed
over the child twenty-one times. Then they take the goat and the after-birth
to a cemetery and here cut the goat’s throat by the halāl rite and bury it with
the after-birth. The idea is thus that the goat’s life is a substitute for that of
the child. By being passed over the child it takes the child’s evil destiny
upon itself, and the burial in a cemetery causes the goat to resemble a human
being, while the after-birth communicates to it some part of the life of the
child. If a mother is afraid her child will die, she sells it for a few cowries to
another woman. Of course the sale is only nominal, but the woman who has
purchased the child takes a special interest in it, and at the naming or other
ceremony she will give it a jewel or such other present as she can afford.
Thus she considers that the fictitious sale has had some effect and that she
has acquired a certain interest in the child.

13. Infantile diseases

If a baby, especially a girl, has much hair on its body, they make a cake of
gram-flour and rub it with sesamum oil all over the body, and this is
supposed to remove the hair.

If a child’s skin dries up and it pines away, they think that an owl has taken
away a cloth stained by the child when it was hung out to dry. The remedy is
to obtain the liver of an owl and hang it round the child’s neck.

For jaundice they get the flesh of a yellow snake which appears in the rains,
and of the rohu fish which has yellowish scales, and hang them to its neck;
or they get a verse of the Korān written out by a Maulvi or Muhammadan
priest and use this as an amulet; or they catch a small frog alive, tie it up in a
yellow cloth and hang it to the child’s neck by a blue thread until it dies. For

Page 285

tetanus the jaws are branded outside and a little musk is placed on the
mother’s breast so that the child may drink it with the milk. When the child
begins to cut its teeth they put honey on the gums and think that this will
make the teeth slip out early as the honey is smooth and slippery. But as the
child licks the gums when the honey is on them they fear that this may cause
the teeth to grow broad and crooked like the tongue. Another device is to
pass a piece of gold round the child’s gums. If they want the child to have
pretty teeth its maternal uncle threads a number of grains of rice on a piece
of string and hangs them round its neck, so that the teeth may grow like the
rice. If the child’s navel is swollen, the maternal uncle will go out for a walk
and on his return place his turban over the navel. For averting the evil eye
the liver of the Indian badger is worn in an amulet, this badger being
supposed to haunt cemeteries and feed on corpses; some hairs of a bear also
form a very favourite amulet, or a tiger’s claws set in silver, or the tail of a
lizard enclosed in lac and made into a ring.

14. Religion. Vālmīki

The religion of the sweepers has been described at length by Mr. Greeven
and Mr. Crooke. It centres round the worship of two saints, Lālbeg or Bale
Shāh and Bālnek or Bālmīk, who is really the huntsman Vālmīki, the reputed
author of the Rāmāyana. Bālmīk was originally a low-caste hunter called
Ratnakār, and when he could not get game he was accustomed to rob and kill
travellers. But one day he met Brahma and wished to kill him; but he could
not raise his club against Brahma, and the god spoke and convinced him of
his sins, directing him to repeat the name of Rāma until he should be
purified of them. But the hunter’s heart was so evil that he could not
pronounce the divine name, and instead he repeated ‘Māra, Māra’ (struck,
struck), but in the end by repetition this came to the same thing. Mr.
Greeven’s account continues: “As a small spark of fire burneth up a heap of
cotton, so the word Rāma cleaneth a man of all his sins. So the words ‘Rām,
Rām,’ were taught unto Ratnakār who ever repeated them for sixty thousand
years at the self-same spot with a heart sincere. All his skin was eaten up by

Page 286

the white ants. Only the skeleton remained. Mud had been heaped over the
body and grass had grown up, yet within the mound of mud the saint was
still repeating the name of Rāma. After sixty thousand years Brahma
returned. No man could he see, yet he heard the voice of Rām, Rām, rising
from the mound of mud. Then Brahma bethought him that the saint was
beneath. He besought Indra to pour down rain and to wash away the mud.
Indra complied with his request and the rain washed away the mud. The
saint came forth. Nought save bones remained. Brahma called aloud to the
saint. When the saint beheld him he prostrated himself and spake: ‘Thou hast
taught me the words “Rām, Rām,” which have cleansed away all my sins.’
Then spake Brahma: ‘Hitherto thou wast Ratnakār. From to-day thy name
shall be Vālmīki (from valmīk, an ant-hill). Now do thou compose a
Rāmāyana in seven parts, containing the deeds and exploits of Rāma.’”
Vālmīki had been or afterwards became a sweeper and was known as
‘cooker of dog’s food’ (Swapach), a name applied to sweepers13, who have
adopted him as their eponymous ancestor and patron saint.

15. Lālbeg

Lālbeg, who is still more widely venerated, is considered to have been Ghāzi
Miyān, the nephew of Sultān Muhammad of Ghazni, and a saint much
worshipped in the Punjab. Many legends are told of Lālbeg, and his worship
is described by Mr. Greeven as follows:14 “The ritual of Lālbeg is conducted
in the presence of the whole brotherhood, as a rule at the festival of the
Diwāli and on other occasions when special business arises. The time for
worship is after sunset and if possible at midnight. His shrine consists of a
mud platform surrounded by steps, with four little turrets at the corners and a
spire in the centre, in which is placed a lamp filled with clarified butter and
containing a wick of twisted tow. Incense is thrown into the flame and
offerings of cakes and sweetmeats are made. A lighted huqqa is placed
before the altar and as soon as the smoke rises it is understood that a whiff
has been drawn by the hero.” A cock is offered to Lālbeg at the Dasahra
festival. When a man is believed to have been affected by the evil eye they

Page 287

wave a broom in front of the sufferer muttering the name of the saint. In the
Damoh District the guru or priest who is the successor of Lālbeg comes
from the Punjab every year or two. He is richly clad and is followed by a
sweeper carrying an umbrella. Other Hindus say that his teaching is that no
one who is not a Lālbegi can go to heaven, but those on whom the dust
raised by a Lālbegi sweeping settles acquire some modicum of virtue.
Similarly Mr. Greeven remarks:15 “Sweepers by no means endorse the
humble opinion entertained with respect to them; for they allude to castes
such as Kunbis and Chamārs as petty (chhota), while a common anecdote is
related to the effect that a Lālbegi, when asked whether Muhammadans
could obtain salvation, replied: ‘I never heard of it, but perhaps they might
slip in behind Lālbeg.’”

16. Adoption of foreign religions

On the whole the religion of the Lālbegis appears to be monotheistic and of a
sufficiently elevated character, resembling that of the Kabīrpanthis and other
reforming sects. Its claim to the exclusive possession of the way of salvation
is a method of revolt against the menial and debased position of the caste.
Similarly many sweepers have become Muhammadans and Sikhs with the
same end in view, as stated by Mr. Greeven:16 “As may be readily imagined,
the scavengers are merely in name the disciples of Nānak Shāh, professing
in fact to be his followers just as they are prepared at a moment’s notice to
become Christians or Muhammadans. Their object is, of course, merely to
acquire a status which may elevate them above the utter degradation of their
caste. The acquaintance of most of them with the doctrines of Nānak Shāh is
at zero. They know little and care less about his rules of life, habitually
disregarding, for instance, the prohibitions against smoking and hair-cutting.
In fact, a scavenger at Benāres no more becomes a Sikh by taking Nānak
Shāh’s motto than he becomes a Christian by wearing a round hat and a pair
of trousers.” It was probably with a similar leaning towards the more liberal
religion that the Lālbegis, though themselves Hindus, adopted a
Muhammadan for their tutelary saint. In the Punjab Muhammadan sweepers

Page 288

who have given up eating carrion and refuse to remove night-soil rank
higher than the others, and are known as Musalli.17 And in Saugor the
Muhammadans allow the sweepers to come into a mosque and to stand at the
back, whereas, of course, they cannot approach a Hindu temple. Again in
Bengal it is stated, “The Dom is regarded with both disgust and fear by all
classes of Hindus, not only on account of his habits being abhorrent and
abominable, but also because he is believed to have no humane or kindly
feelings”; and further, “It is universally believed that Doms do not bury or
burn their dead, but dismember the corpse at night like the inhabitants of
Thibet, placing the fragments in a pot and sinking them in the nearest river
or reservoir. This horrid idea probably originated from the old Hindu law,
which compelled the Doms to bury their dead at night.”18 It is not
astonishing that the sweepers prefer a religion whose followers will treat
them somewhat more kindly. Another Muhammadan saint revered by the
sweepers of Saugor is one Zāhir Pīr. At the fasts in Chait and Kunwār
(March and September) they tie cocoanuts wrapped in cloth to the top of a
long bamboo, and marching to the tomb of Zāhir Pīr make offerings of cakes
and sweetmeats. Before starting for his day’s work the sweeper does
obeisance to his basket and broom.

17. Social status

The sweeper stands at the very bottom of the social ladder of Hinduism. He
is considered to be the representative of the Chandāla of Manu,19 who was
said to be descended of a Sūdra father and a Brāhman woman. “It was
ordained that the Chandāla should live without the town; his sole wealth
should be dogs and asses; his clothes should consist of the cerecloths of the
dead; his dishes should be broken pots and his ornaments rusty iron. No one
who regarded his duties should hold intercourse with the Chandālas and they
should marry only among themselves. By day they might roam about for the
purposes of work, but should be distinguished by the badges of the Rāja, and
should carry out the corpse of any one who died without kindred. They
should always be employed to slay those who by the law were sentenced to

Page 289

be put to death, and they might take the clothes of the slain, their beds and
their ornaments.” Elsewhere the Chandāla is said to rank in impurity with
the town boar, the dog, a woman during her monthly illness and a eunuch,
none of whom must a Brāhman allow to see him when eating.20 Like the
Chandāla, the sweeper cannot be touched, and he himself acquiesces in this
and walks apart. In large towns he sometimes carries a kite’s wing in his
turban to show his caste, or goes aloof saying pois, which is equivalent to a
warning. When the sweeper is in company he will efface himself as far as
possible behind other people. He is known by his basket and broom, and
men of other castes will not carry these articles lest they should be mistaken
for a sweeper. The sweeper’s broom is made of bamboo, whereas the
ordinary house-broom is made of date-palm leaves. The house-broom is
considered sacred as the implement of Lakshmi used in cleaning the house.
No one should tread upon or touch it with his foot. The sweeper’s broom is a
powerful agent for curing the evil eye, and mothers get him to come and
wave it up and down in front of a sick child for this purpose. Nevertheless it
is lucky to see a sweeper in the morning, especially if he has his basket with
him. In Gujarāt Mr. Bhīmbhai Kirpārām writes of him: “Though he is held to
be lower and more unclean, the Bhangia is viewed with kindlier feelings
than the Dhed (Mahār). To meet the basket-bearing Bhangia is lucky, and the
Bhangia’s blessing is valued. Even now if a Government officer goes into a
Bhangia hamlet the men with hands raised in blessing say: ‘May your rule
last for ever.’” A sweeper will eat the leavings of other people, but he will
not eat in their houses; he will take the food away to his own house. It is
related that on one occasion a sweeper accompanied a marriage party of
Lodhis (cultivators), and the Lodhi who was the host was anxious that all
should share his hospitality and asked the sweeper to eat in his house;21 but
he repeatedly refused, until finally the Lodhi gave him a she-buffalo to
induce him to eat, so that it might not be said that any one had declined to
share in his feast. No other caste, of course, will accept food or water from a
sweeper, and only a Chamār (tanner) will take a chilam or clay pipe-bowl
from his hand. The sweeper will eat carrion and the flesh of almost all
animals, including snakes, lizards, crocodiles and tigers, and also the
leavings of food of almost any caste. Mr. Greeven remarks:22 “Only Lālbegis
and Rāwats eat food left by Europeans, but all eat food left either by Hindus
or Muhammadans; the Sheikh Mehtars as Muhammadans alone are

Page 290

circumcised and reject pig’s flesh. Each subcaste eats uncooked food with all
the others, but cooked food alone.” From Betūl it is reported that the
Mehtars there will not accept food, water or tobacco from a Kāyasth, and
will not allow one to enter their houses.

18. Occupation

Sweeping and scavenging in the streets and in private houses are the
traditional occupations of the caste, but they have others. In Bombay they
serve as night watchmen, town-criers, drummers, trumpeters and hangmen.
Formerly the office of hangman was confined to sweepers, but now many
low-caste prisoners are willing to undertake it for the sake of the privilege of
smoking tobacco in jail which it confers. In Mīrzāpur when a Dom hangman
is tying a rope round the neck of a criminal he shouts out, ‘Dohai Mahārāni,
Dohai Sarkār, Dohai Judge Sāhib,’ or ‘Hail Great Queen! Hail Government!
Hail Judge Sahib!’ in order to shelter himself under their authority and
escape any guilt attaching to the death.23 In the Central Provinces the
hangman was accompanied by four or five other sweepers of the caste
panchāyat the idea being perhaps that his act should be condoned by their
presence and approval and he should escape guilt. In order to free the
executioner from blame the prisoner would also say: “Dohai Sarkar ke,
Dohai Kampani ke; jaisa maine khūn kiya waisa apne khūn ko pahunchha”
or “Hail to the Government and the Company; since I caused the death of
another, now I am come to my own death”; and all the Panches said, ‘Rām,
Rām.’ The hangman received ten rupees as his fee, and of this five rupees
were given to the caste for a feast and an offering to Lālbeg to expiate his
sin. In Bundelkhand sweepers are employed as grooms by the Lodhis, and
may put everything on to the horse except a saddle-cloth. They are also the
village musicians, and some of them play on the rustic flute called shahnai at
weddings, and receive their food all the time that the ceremony lasts.
Sweepers are, as a rule, to be found only in large villages, as in small ones
there is no work for them. The caste is none too numerous in the Central
Provinces, and in villages the sweeper is often not available when wanted for

Page 291

cleaning the streets. The Chamārs of Bundelkhand will not remove the
corpses of a cat or a dog or a squirrel, and a sweeper must be obtained for
the purpose. These three animals are in a manner holy, and it is considered a
sin to kill any one of them. But their corpses are unclean. A Chamār also
refuses to touch the corpse of a donkey, but a Kumhār (potter) will
sometimes do this; if he declines a sweeper must be fetched. When a
sweeper has to enter a house in order to take out the body of an animal, it is
cleaned and whitewashed after he has been in. In Hoshangābād an objection
appears to be felt to the entry of a sweeper by the door, as it is stated that a
ladder is placed for him, so that he presumably climbs through a window. Or
where there are no windows it is possible that the ladder may protect the
sacred threshold from contact with his feet. The sweeper also attends at
funerals and assists to prepare the pyre; he receives the winding-sheet when
this is not burnt or buried with the corpse, and the copper coins which are
left on the ground as purchase-money for the site of the grave. In Bombay in
rich families the winding-sheet is often a worked shawl costing from fifty to
a hundred rupees.24 When a Hindu widow breaks her bangles after her
husband’s death, she gives them, including one or two whole ones, to a
Bhangia woman.25 A letter announcing a death is always carried by a
sweeper.26 In Bengal a funeral could not be held without the presence of a
Dom, whose functions are described by Mr. Sherring27 as follows: “On the
arrival of the dead body at the place of cremation, which in Benāres is at the
basis of one of the steep stairs or ghāts, called the Burning-Ghāt, leading
down from the streets above to the bed of the river Ganges, the Dom
supplies five logs of wood, which he lays in order upon the ground, the rest
of the wood being given by the family of the deceased. When the pile is
ready for burning a handful of lighted straw is brought by the Dom, and is
taken from him and applied by one of the chief members of the family to the
wood. The Dom is the only person who can furnish the light for the purpose;
and if for any reason no Dom is available, great delay and inconvenience are
apt to arise. The Dom exacts his fee for three things, namely, first for the five
logs, secondly for the bunch of straw, and thirdly for the light.”

Page 292

19. Occupation (continued)

During an eclipse the sweepers reap a good harvest; for it is believed that
Rāhu, the demon who devours the sun and moon and thus causes an eclipse,
was either a sweeper or the deity of the sweepers, and alms given to them at
this time will appease him and cause him to let the luminaries go. Or,
according to another account, the sun and moon are in Rāhu’s debt, and he
comes and duns them, and this is the eclipse; and the alms given to sweepers
are a means of paying the debt. In Gujarāt as soon as the darkening sets in
the Bhangis go about shouting, ‘Garhandān, Vastradān, Rupādān,’ or ‘Gifts
for the eclipse, gifts of clothes, gifts of silver.’28 The sweepers are no doubt
derived from the primitive or Dravidian tribes, and, as has been seen, they
also practise the art of making bamboo mats and baskets, being known as
Bānsphor in Bombay on this account. In the Punjab the Chuhras are a very
numerous caste, being exceeded only by the Jāts, Rājpūts and Brāhmans.
Only a small proportion of them naturally find employment as scavengers,
and the remainder are agricultural labourers, and together with the vagrants
and gipsies are the hereditary workers in grass and reeds.29 They are closely
connected with the Dhānuks, a caste of hunters, fowlers and village
watchmen, being of nearly the same status.30 And Dhānuk, again, is in some
localities a complimentary term for a Basor or bamboo-worker. It has been
seen that Vālmīki, the patron saint of the sweepers, was a low-caste hunter,
and this gives some reason for the supposition that the primary occupations
of the Chūhras and Bhangis were hunting and working in grass and bamboo.
In one of the legends of the sweeper saint Bālmīk or Vālmīki given by Mr.
Greeven,31 Bālmīk was the youngest of the five Pāndava brothers, and was
persuaded by the others to remove the body of a calf which had died in their
courtyard. But after he had done so they refused to touch him, so he went
into the wilderness with the body; and when he did not know how to feed
himself the carcase started into life and gave him milk until he was full
grown, when it died again of its own accord. Bālmīk burst into tears, not
knowing how he was to live henceforward, but a voice cried from heaven

Page 293

saying, “Of the sinews (of the calf’s body) do thou tie winnows (sūp), and of
the caul do thou plait sieves (chalni).” Bālmīk obeyed, and by his handiwork
gained the name of Sūpaj or the maker of winnowing-fans. These are natural
occupations of the non-Aryan forest tribes, and are now practised by the
Gonds.

1 Some information has been obtained from a paper by Mr. Harbans Rai, Clerk of Court, Damoh.
2 Rājendrā Lāl Mitra, quoted in art. on Beria.
3 Greeven, op. cit. pp. 29, 33.

4 Op. cit p. 334.
5 Greeven, p. 66, quoting from Echoes of Old Calcutta.

6 Crooke, op. cit.
7 Crooke, op. cit. para. 52.

8 Ibbetson, op. cit. para. 227.
9 Greeven, op. cit. p. 21.

10 The fruit of the achār (Buchanamia latifolia).
11 Acacia arabica.

12 Acacia catechu.
13 Some writers consider that Bālmik, the sweeper-saint, and Vālmīki, the author of the Rāmāyana,
are not identical.

14 Page 38.
15 Page 8.

16 Page 54.
17 Punjab Census Report (1881), para. 599.

18 Sir H. Risley, l.c., art. Dom.
19 Institutes, x. 12–29–30.

20 Ibidem, iv. 239, quoted by Mr. Crooke, art. Dom.
21 Probably not within the house but in the veranda or courtyard.

22 Ibidem.

Page 294

23 Crooke, Tribes and Castes, art. Dom, para. 34.

24 Bombay Gazetteer, l.c.
25 Ibidem.

26 Punjab Census Report (1881), and Bombay Gazetteer, l.c.
27 Hindu Tribes and Castes, quoted by Sir H. Risley, art. Dom.

28 Bombay Gazetteer, l.c.
29 Ibbetson, l.c. para. 596.

30 Ibidem, para. 601.
31 L.c. pp. 25, 26.

Page 295

Meo
Meo, Mewāti.—The Muhammadan branch of the Mīna tribe belonging to
the country of Mewāt in Rājputāna which is comprised in the Alwar,
Bharatpur and Jaipur States and the British District of Gurgaon. A few Meos
were returned from the Hoshangābād and Nimār Districts in 1911, but it is
doubtful whether any are settled here, as they may be wandering criminals.
The origin of the Meo is discussed in the article on the Mīna tribe, but some
interesting remarks on them by Mr. Channing and Major Powlett in the
Rājputāna Gazetteer may be reproduced here. Mr. Channing writes:1

“The tribe, which has been known in Hindustān according to the Kutub
Tawārīkh for 850 years, was originally Hindu and became Muhammadan.
Their origin is obscure. They themselves claim descent from the Rājpūt
races of Jādon, Kachhwāha and Tuar, and they may possibly have some
Rājpūt blood in their veins; but they are probably, like many other similar
tribes, a combination from ruling and other various stocks and sources, and
there is reason to believe them very nearly allied with the Mīnas, who are
certainly a tribe of the same structure and species. The Meos have twelve
clans or pāls, the first six of which are identical in name and claim the same
descent as the first six clans of the Mīnas. Intermarriage between them both
was the rule until the time of Akbar, when owing to an affray at the marriage
of a Meo with a Mīna the custom was discontinued. Finally, their mode of
life is or was similar, as both tribes were once notoriously predatory. It is
probable that the original Meos were supplemented by converts to Islām
from other castes. It is said that the tribe were conquered and converted in
the eleventh century by Māsūd, son of Amīr Sālār and grandson of Sultān
Mahmūd Subaktagin on the mother’s side, the general of the forces of
Mahmūd of Ghazni. Māsūd is still venerated by the Meos, and they swear by
his name. They have a mixture of Hindu and Muhammadan customs. They
practise circumcision, nikāh2 and the burial of the dead. They make
pilgrimages to the tomb of Māsūd in Bahraich in Oudh, and consider the
oath taken on his banner the most binding. They also make pilgrimages to

Page 296

Muhammadan shrines in India, but never perform the Haj. Of Hindu
customs they observe the Holi or Diwāli; their marriages are never arranged
in the same got or sept; and they permit daughters to inherit. They call their
children indiscriminately by both Muhammadan and Hindu names. They are
almost entirely uneducated, but have bards and musicians to whom they
make large presents. These sing songs known as Rātwai, which are
commonly on pastoral and agricultural subjects. The Meos are given to the
use of intoxicating drinks, and are very superstitious and have great faith in
omens. The dress of the men and women resembles that of the Hindus.
Infanticide was formerly common among them, but it is said to have entirely
died out. They were also formerly robbers by avocation; and though they
have improved they are still noted cattle-lifters.”

In another description of them by Major Powlett it is stated that, besides
worshipping Hindu gods and keeping Hindu festivals, they employ a
Brāhman to write the Pīli Chhitthi or yellow note fixing the date of a
marriage. They call themselves by Hindu names with the exception of Rām;
and Singh is a frequent affix, though not so common as Khān. On the
Amāwas or monthly conjunction of the sun and moon, Meos, in common
with Hindu Ahīrs and Gūjars, cease from labour; and when they make a well
the first proceeding is to erect a chabūtra (platform) to Bhaironji or
Hanumān. However, when plunder was to be obtained they have often
shown little respect for Hindu shrines and temples; and when the sanctity of
a threatened place has been urged, the retort has been, ‘Tum to Deo, Ham
Meo’ or ‘You may be a Deo (God), but I am a Meo.’

Meos do not marry in their pāl or clan, but they are lax about forming
connections with women of other castes, whose children they receive into
the community. As already stated, Brāhmans take part in the formalities
preceding a marriage, but the ceremony itself is performed by a Kāzi. As
agriculturists Meos are inferior to their Hindu neighbours. The point in
which they chiefly fail is in working their wells, for which they lack
patience. Their women, whom they do not confine, will, it is said, do more
field-work than the men; indeed, one often finds women at work in the crops
when the men are lying down. Like the women of low Hindu castes they
tattoo their bodies, a practice disapproved by Musalmāns in general. Abul

Page 297

Fazl writes that the Meos were in his time famous runners, and one thousand
of them were employed by Akbar as carriers of the post.

1 Rājputāna Gazetteer, vol. i. p. 165.

2 A Muhammadan form of marriage.

Page 298

Mīna

1. The Mīnas locally termed Deswā

Mīna, Deswāli, Maina.—A well-known caste of Rājputāna which is found
in the Central Provinces in the Hoshangābād, Nimār and Saugor Districts.
About 8000 persons of the caste were returned in 1911. The proper name for
them is Mīna, but here they are generally known as Deswāli, a term which
they probably prefer, as that of Mīna is too notorious. A large part of the
population of the northern Districts is recruited from Bundelkhand and
Mārwār, and these tracts are therefore often known among them as ‘Desh’ or
native country. The term Deswāli is applied to groups of many castes coming
from Bundelkhand, and has apparently been specially appropriated as an
alias by the Mīnas. The caste are sometimes known in Hoshangābād as
Maina, which Colonel Tod states to be the name of the highest division of
the Mīnas. The designation of Pardeshi or ‘foreigner’ is also given to them in
some localities. The Deswālis came to Harda about A.D. 1750, being invited
by the Marātha Amīl or governor, who gave one family a grant of three
villages. They thus gained a position of some dignity, and this reaching the
ears of their brothers in Jaipur they also came and settled all over the
District.1 In view of the history and character of the Mīnas, of which some
account will be given, it should be first stated that under the régime of
British law and order most of the Deswālis of Hoshangābād have settled
down into steady and honest agriculturists.

Page 299

2. Historical notice of the Mīna tribe

The Mīnas were a famous robber tribe of the country of Mewāt in Rājputāna,
comprised in the Alwar and Bharatpur States and the British District of
Gurgaon.2 They are also found in large numbers in Jaipur State, which was
formerly held by them. The Meos and Mīnas are now considered to be
branches of one tribe, the former being at least nominally Muhammadans by
religion and the latter Hindus. A favourite story for recitation at their feasts is
that of Darya Khān Meo and Sasibādani Mīni, a pair of lovers whose
marriage led to a quarrel between the tribes to which they belonged, in the
time of Akbar. This dispute caused the cessation of the practice of
intermarriage between Meos and Mīnas which had formerly obtained. Both
the Meos and Mīnas are divided into twelve large clans called pāl, the word
pāl meaning, according to Colonel Tod, ‘a defile in a valley suitable for
cultivation or defence.’ In a sandy desert like Rājputāna the valleys of
streams might be expected to be the only favourable tracts for settlement,
and the name perhaps therefore is a record of the process by which the
colonies of Mīnas in these isolated patches of culturable land developed into
exogamous clans marrying with each other. The Meos have similarly twelve
pāls, and the names of six of these are identical with those of the Mīnas.3
The names of the pāls are taken from those of Rājpūt clans,4 but the
recorded lists differ, and there are now many other gots or septs outside the
pāls. The Mīnas seem originally to have been an aboriginal or pre-Aryan
tribe of Rājputāna, where they are still found in considerable numbers. The
Rāja of Jaipur was formerly marked on the forehead with blood taken from
the great toe of a Mīna on the occasion of his installation. Colonel Tod
records that the Amber or Jaipur State was founded by one Dholesai in A.D.
967 after he had slaughtered large numbers of the Mīnas by treachery. And
in his time the Mīnas still possessed large immunities and privileges in the
Jaipur State. When the Rājpūts settled in force in Rājputāna, reducing the
Mīnas to subjection, illicit connections would naturally arise on a large scale
between the invaders and the women of the conquered country. For even

Page 300

when the Rājpūts only came as small isolated parties of adventurers, as into
the Central Provinces, we find traces of such connections in the survival of
castes or subcastes of mixed descent from them and the indigenous tribes. It
follows therefore that where they occupied the country and settled on the soil
the process would be still more common. Accordingly it is generally
recognised that the Mīnas are a caste of the most mixed and impure descent,
and it has sometimes been supposed that they were themselves a branch of
the Rājpūts. In the Punjab when one woman accuses another of illicit
intercourse she is said ‘Mīna dena,’ or to designate her as a Mīna.5 Further it
is stated6 that “The Mīnas are of two classes, the Zamīndāri or agricultural
and the Chaukīdāri or watchmen. These Chaukīdāri Mīnas are the famous
marauders.” The office of village watchman was commonly held by
members of the aboriginal tribes, and these too furnished the criminal
classes. Another piece of evidence of the Dravidian origin of the tribe is the
fact that there exists even now a group of Dhedia or impure Mīnas who do
not refuse to eat cow’s flesh. The Chaukīdāri Mīnas, dispossessed of their
land, resorted to the hills, and here they developed into a community of
thieves and bandits recruited from all the outcastes of society. Sir A. Lyall
wrote7 of the caste as “a Cave of Adullam which has stood open for
centuries. With them a captured woman is solemnly admitted by a form of
adoption into one circle of affinity, in order that she may be lawfully married
into another.” With the conquest of northern India by the Muhammadans,
many of the Mīnas, being bound by no ties to Hinduism, might be expected
to embrace the new and actively proselytising religion, while their robber
bands would receive fugitive Muhammadans as recruits as well as Hindus.
Thus probably arose a Musalmān branch of the community, who afterwards
became separately designated as the Meos. As already seen, the Meos and
Mīnas intermarried for a time, but subsequently ceased to do so. As might be
expected, the form of Islām professed by the Meos is of a very bastard order,
and Major Powlett’s account of it is reproduced in a short separate notice of
that tribe.

3. Their robberies

Page 301

The crimes and daring of the Mīnas have obtained for them a considerable
place in history. A Muhammadan historian, Zia-ud-dīn Bāmi, wrote of the
tribe:8 “At night they were accustomed to come prowling into the city of
Delhi, giving all kinds of trouble and depriving people of their rest, and they
plundered the country houses in the neighbourhood of the city. Their daring
was carried to such an extent that the western gates of the city were shut at
afternoon prayer and no one dared to leave it after that hour, whether he
travelled as a pilgrim or with the display of a king. At afternoon prayer they
would often come to the Sarhouy, and assaulting the water-carriers and girls
who were fetching water they would strip them and carry off their clothes. In
turn they were treated by the Muhammadan rulers with the most merciless
cruelty. Some were thrown under the feet of elephants, others were cut in
halves with knives, and others again were flayed alive from head to foot.”
Regular campaigns against them were undertaken by the Muhammadans,9 as
in later times British forces had to be despatched to subdue the Pindāris.
Bābar on his arrival at Agra described the Mewāti leader Rāja Hasan Khān
as ‘the chief agitator in all these confusions and insurrections’; and Firishta
mentions two terrible slaughters of Mewātis in A.D. 1259 and 1265. In 1857
Major Powlett records that in Alwar they assembled and burnt the State ricks
and carried off cattle, though they did not succeed in plundering any towns
or villages there. In British territory they sacked Firozpur and other villages,
and when a British force came to restore order many were hanged. Sir D.
Ibbetson wrote of them in the Punjab:10

“The Mīnas are the boldest of our criminal classes. Their headquarters so far
as the Punjab is concerned are in the village of Shāhjahānpur, attached to the
Gurgaon District but surrounded on all sides by Rājputāna territory. There
they until lately defied our police and even resisted them with armed force.
Their enterprises are on a large scale, and they are always prepared to use
violence if necessary. In Mārwār they are armed with small bows which do
considerable execution. They travel great distances in gangs of from twelve
to twenty men, practising robbery and dacoity even as far as the Deccan. The
gangs usually start off immediately after the Diwāli feast and often remain
absent the whole year. They have agents in all the large cities of Rājputāna
and the Deccan who give them information, and they are in league with the

Page 302

carrying castes of Mārwār. After a successful foray they offer one-tenth of
the proceeds at the shrine of Kāli Devi.”

Like other criminals they were very superstitious, and Colonel Tod records
that the partridge and the maloli or wagtail were their chief birds of omen. A
partridge clamouring on the left when he commenced a foray was a certain
presage of success to a Mīna. Similarly, Mr. Kennedy notes that the finding
of a dried goatskin, either whole or in pieces, among the effects of a
suspected criminal is said to be an infallible indication of his identity as a
Mīna, the flesh of the goat’s tongue being indispensable in connection with
the taking of omens. In Jaipur the Mīnas were employed as guards, as a
method of protection against their fellows, for whose misdeeds they were
held responsible. Rent-free lands were given to them, and they were always
employed to escort treasure. Here they became the most faithful and trusted
of the Rāja’s servants. It is related that on one occasion a Mīna sentinel at the
palace had received charge of a basket of oranges. A friend of the same tribe
came to him and asked to be shown the palace, which he had never seen.
The sentinel agreed and took him over the palace, but when his back was
turned the friend stole one orange from the basket. Subsequently the sentinel
counted the oranges and found one short; on this he ran after his friend and
taxed him with the theft, which being admitted, the Mīna said that he had
been made to betray his trust and had become dishonoured, and drawing his
sword cut off his friend’s head. The ancient treasure of Jaipur or Amber was,
according to tradition, kept in a secret cave in the hills under a body of Mīna
guards who alone knew the hiding-place, and would only permit any part of
it to be withdrawn for a great emergency. Nor would they accept the orders
of the Rāja alone, but required the consent of the heads of the twelve
principal noble families of Amber, branches of the royal house, before they
would give up any part of the treasure. The criminal Mīnas are said to
inhabit a tract of country about sixty-five miles long and forty broad,
stretching from Shāhpur forty miles north of Jaipur to Guraora in Gurgaon
on the Rohtak border. The popular idea of the Mīna, Mr. Crooke remarks,11
is quite in accordance with his historical character; his niggardliness is
shown in the saying, ‘The Meo will not give his daughter in marriage till he
gets a mortar full of silver’; his pugnacity is expressed in, ‘The Meo’s son
begins to avenge his feuds when he is twelve years old’; and his toughness

Page 303

in, ‘Never be sure that a Meo is dead till you see the third-day funeral
ceremony performed.’

4. The Deswālis of the Central Provinces

As already stated, the Deswālis of the Central Provinces have abandoned the
wild life of their ancestors and settled down as respectable cultivators. Only
a few particulars about them need be recorded. Girls are usually married
before they are twelve years old and boys at sixteen to twenty. A sum of Rs.
24 is commonly paid for the bride, and a higher amount up to Rs. 71 may be
given, but this is the maximum, and if the father of the girl takes more he
will be fined by the caste and made to refund the balance. A triangle with
some wooden models of birds is placed on the marriage-shed and the
bridegroom strikes at these with a stick; formerly he fired a gun at them to
indicate that he was a hunter by profession. A Brāhman is employed to
celebrate the marriage. A widow is usually taken by her late husband’s
younger brother, but if there be none the elder brother may marry her,
contrary to the general rule among Hindus. The object is to keep the woman
in the family, as wives are costly. If she is unwilling to marry her brother-in-
law, however, no compulsion is exercised and she may wed another man.
Divorce is allowed, and in Rājputāna is very simply effected. If tempers do
not assimilate or other causes prompt them to part, the husband tears a shred
from his turban which he gives to his wife, and with this simple bill of
divorce, placing two jars of water on her head, she takes whatever path she
pleases, and the first man who chooses to ease her of her load becomes her
future lord. ‘Jehur nikāla,’ ‘Took the jar and went forth,’ is a common saying
among the mountaineers of Merwara.12

The dead are cremated, the corpse of a man being wrapped in a white and
that of a woman in a coloured cloth. They have no shrāddh ceremony, but
mourn for the dead only on the last day of Kārtik (October), when they offer
water and burn incense. Deswālis employ the Parsai or village Brāhman to
officiate at their ceremonies, but owing to their mixed origin they rank

Page 304

below the cultivating castes, and Brāhmans will not take water from them. In
Jaipur, however, Major Powlett says, their position is higher. They are, as
already seen, the trusted guards of the palace and treasury, and Rājpūts will
accept food and water from their hands. This concession is no doubt due to
the familiarity induced by living together for a long period, and parallel
instances of it can be given, as that of the Panwārs and Gonds in the Central
Provinces. The Deswālis eat flesh and drink liquor, but abstain from fowls
and pork. When they are invited to a feast they do not take their own brass
vessels with them, but drink out of earthen pots supplied by the host, having
the liquor poured on to their hands held to the mouth to avoid actual contact
with the vessel. This is a Mārwāri custom and the Jāts also have it. Before
the commencement of the feast the guests wait until food has been given to
as many beggars as like to attend. In Saugor the food served consists only of
rice and pulse without vegetables or other dishes. It is said that a Mīna will
not eat salt in the house of another man, because he considers that to do so
would establish the bond of Nimak-khai or salt-eating between them, and he
would be debarred for ever from robbing that man or breaking into his
house. The guests need not sit down together as among other Hindus, but
may take their food in batches; so that the necessity of awaiting the arrival of
every guest before commencing the feast is avoided. The Deswālis will not
kill a black-buck nor eat the flesh of one, but they assign no reason for this
and do not now worship the animal. The rule is probably, however, a
totemistic survival. The men may be known by their manly gait and harsh
tone of voice, as well as by a peculiar method of tying the turban; the women
have a special ornament called rākhdi on the forehead and do not wear
spangles or toe-rings. They are said also to despise ornaments of the baser
metals as brass and pewter. They are tattooed with dots on the face to set off
the fair-coloured skin by contrast, in the same manner as patches were
carried on the face in Europe in the eighteenth century. A tattoo dot on a fair
face is likened by a Hindu poet to a bee sitting on a half-opened mango.

1 Elliott’s Hoshangābād Settlement Report, p. 63.

2 Cunningham’s Archaeological Survey Reports, xx. p. 24.
3 Ibidem.

Page 305

4 General Cunningham’s enumeration of the pāls is as follows: Five Jādon clans—Chhirkilta,
Dalāt, Dermot, Nai, Pundelot; five Tuar clans—Balot, Darwār, Kalesa, Lundāvat, Rattāwat; one
Kachhwāha clan—Dingāl; one Bargjūar clan—Singāl. Besides these there is one miscellaneous or
half-blood clan, Palakra, making up the common total of 12½ clans.

5 Ibbetson’s Punjab Census Report, para. 582. Sir D. Ibbetson considered it doubtful, however,
whether the expression referred to the Mīna caste.
6 Major Powlett, Gazetteer of Alwar.

7 Asiatic Studies, vol. i. p. 162.
8 Quoted in Dowson’s Elliott’s History of India, iii. p. 103.

9 Dowson’s Elliott, iv. pp. 60, 75, 283, quoted in Crooke’s Tribes and Castes.
10 Census Report (1881), para. 582.

11 Tribes and Castes of the N.W.P. art. Meo.
12 Rājasthān, i. p. 589.

Page 306

Mirāsi
Mirāsi.—A Muhammadan caste of singers, minstrels and genealogists, of
which a few members are found in the Central Provinces. General
Cunningham says that they are the bards and singers of the Meos or Mewātis
at all their marriages and festivals.1 Mr. Crooke is of opinion that they are
undoubtedly an offshoot of the great Dom caste who are little better than
sweepers.2 The word Mirāsi is derived from the Arabic mirās, inheritance,
and its signification is supposed to be that the Mirāsis are the hereditary
bards and singers of the lower castes, as the Bhāt is of the Rājpūts. Mirās as
a word may, however, be used of any hereditary right, as that of the village
headman or Karnam, or even those of the village watchman or temple
dancing-girl, all of whom may have a mirāsi right to fees or perquisites or
plots of land held as remuneration for service.3 The Mirāsis are also known
as Pakhāwaji, from the pakhāwaj or timbrel which they play; as Kawwāl or
one who speaks fluently, that is a professional, story-teller; and as Kalāwant
or one possessed of art or skill. The Mirāsis are most numerous in the
Punjab, where they number a quarter of a million. Sir D. Ibbetson says of
them:4 “The social position of the Mirāsi as of all minstrel castes is
exceedingly low, but he attends at weddings and similar occasions to recite
genealogies. Moreover there are grades even among Mirāsis. The outcaste
tribes have their Mirāsis, who though they do not eat with their clients and
merely render their professional services are considered impure by the
Mirāsis of the higher castes. The Mirāsi is generally a hereditary servant like
the Bhāt, and is notorious for his exactions, which he makes under the threat
of lampooning the ancestors of him from whom he demands fees. The
Mirāsi is almost always a Muhammadan.” They are said to have been
converted to Islām in response to the request of the poet Amīr Khusru, who
lived in the reign of Ala-ud-dīn Khilji (A.D. 1295). The Mirāsi has two
functions, the men being musicians, storytellers and genealogists, while the
women dance and sing, but only before the ladies of the zenāna. Mr.
Nesfield5 says that they are sometimes regularly entertained as jesters to
help these ladies to kill time and reconcile them to their domestic prisons. As

Page 307

they do not dance before men they are reputed to be chaste, as no woman
who is not a prostitute will dance in the presence of men, though singing and
playing are not equally condemned. The implements of the Mirāsis are
generally the small drum (dholak), the cymbals (majīra) and the gourd lute
(kingri).6

1 Archaeological Reports. vol. xx. p. 26.
2 Tribes and Castes of the North-Western Provinces, vol. iii. p. 496.

3 Baden Powell’s Land Systems of British India, vol. iii. p. 116.
4 Punjab Ethnography, p. 289.

5 Brief View, p. 43.
6 Crooke, loc. cit.

Page 308

Mochi1
List of Paragraphs

1. General notice
2. Legends of origin
3. Art among the Hindus
4. Antagonism of Mochis and Chamārs
5. Exogamous groups
6. Social customs
7. Shoes

1. General notice

Mochi, Muchi, Jīngar, Jirayat, Jīldgar, Chitrakār, Chitevari, Musabir.—
The occupational caste of saddlers and cobblers. In 1911 about 4000 Mochis
and 2000 Jīngars were returned from the Central Provinces and Berār, the
former residing principally in the Hindustāni and the latter in the Marāthi-
speaking Districts. The name is derived from the Sanskrit mochika and the
Hindustāni mojna, to fold, and the common name mojah for socks and
stockings is from the same root (Platts). By origin the Mochis are no doubt
an offshoot of the Chamār caste, but they now generally disclaim the
connection. Mr. Nesfield observes2 that, “The industry of tanning is
preparatory to and lower than that of cobblery, and hence the caste of
Chamār ranks decidedly below that of Mochi. The ordinary Hindu does not
consider the touch of a Mochi so impure as that of the Chamār, and there is a
Hindu proverb to the effect that ‘Dried or prepared hide is the same thing as
cloth,’ whereas the touch of the raw hide before it has been tanned by the
Chamār is considered a pollution. The Mochi does not eat carrion like the

Page 309

Chamār, nor does he eat swine’s flesh; nor does his wife ever practise the
much-loathed art of midwifery.” In the Central Provinces, as in northern
India, the caste may be considered to have two branches, the lower one
consisting of the Mochis who make and cobble shoes and are admittedly
descended from Chamārs; while the better-class men either make saddles
and harness, when they are known as Jīngar; or bind books, when they are
called Jīldgar; or paint and make clay idols, when they are given the
designation either of Chitrakār, Chitevari or Murtikār. In Berār some Jīngars
have taken up the finer kinds of iron-work, such as mending guns, and are
known as Jirāyat. All these are at great pains to dissociate themselves from
the Chamār caste. They call themselves Thākur or Rājpūt and have
exogamous sections the names of which are identical with those of the
Rājpūt septs. The same people have assumed the name of Rishi in Bengal,
and, according to a story related by Sir H. Risley, claim to be debased
Brāhmans; while in the United Provinces Mr. Crooke considers them to be
connected with the Srivāstab Kāyasths, with whom they intermarry and
agree in manners and customs. The fact that in the three Provinces these
workers in leather claim descent from three separate high castes is an
interesting instance of the trouble which the lower-class Hindus will take to
obtain a slight increase in social consideration; but the very diversity of the
accounts given induces the belief that all Mochis were originally sprung
from the Chamārs. In Bombay, again, Mr. Enthoven3 writes that the caste
prefers to style itself Arya Somavansi Kshatriya or Aryan Kshatriyas of the
Moon division; while they have all the regular Brāhmanical gotras as
Bhāradwāja, Vasishtha, Gautam and so on.

2. Legends of origin

The following interesting legends as to the origin of the caste adduced by
them in support of their Brāhmanical descent are related4 by Sir H. Risley:
“One of the Prajā-pati, or mind-born sons of Brahma, was in the habit of
providing the flesh of cows and clarified butter as a burnt-offering (Ahuti) to
the gods. It was then the custom to eat a portion of the sacrifice, restore the

Page 310

victim to life, and drive it into the forest. On one occasion the Prajā-pati
failed to resuscitate the sacrificial animal, owing to his wife, who was
pregnant at the time, having clandestinely made away with a portion.
Alarmed at this he summoned all the other Prajā-patis, and they sought by
divination to discover the cause of the failure. At last they ascertained what
had occurred, and as a punishment the wife was cursed and expelled from
their society. The child which she bore was the first Mochi or tanner, and
from that time forth, mankind being deprived of the power of reanimating
cattle slaughtered for food, the pious abandoned the practice of killing kine
altogether. Another story is that Muchirām, the ancestor of the caste, was
born from the sweat of Brahma while dancing. He chanced to offend the
irritable sage Durvāsa, who sent a pretty Brāhman widow to allure him into a
breach of chastity. Muchirām accosted the widow as mother, and refused to
have anything to do with her; but Durvāsa used the miraculous power he had
acquired by penance to render the widow pregnant so that the innocent
Muchirām was made an outcaste on suspicion. From her two sons are
descended the two main branches of the caste in Bengal.”

3. Art among the Hindus

In the Central Provinces the term Mochi is often used for the whole caste in
the northern Districts, and Jīngar in the Marātha country; while the
Chitrakārs or painters form a separate group. Though the trades of cobbler
and book-binder are now widely separated in civilised countries, the
connection between them is apparent since both work in leather. It is not at
first sight clear why the painter should be of the same caste, but the reason is
perhaps that his brushes are made of the hair of animals, and this is also
regarded as impure, as being a part of the hide. If such be the case a
senseless caste rule of ceremonial impurity has prevented the art of painting
from being cultivated by the Hindus; and the comparatively poor
development of their music may perhaps be ascribed to the same cause,
since the use of the sinews of animals for stringed instruments would also
prevent the educated classes from learning to play them. Thus no stringed

Page 311

instruments are permitted to be used in temples, but only the gong, cymbal,
horn and conch-shell. And this rule would greatly discourage the cultivation
of music, which art, like all the others, has usually served in its early period
as an appanage to religious services. It has been held that instruments were
originally employed at temples and shrines in order to scare away evil spirits
by their noise while the god was being fed or worshipped, and not for the
purpose of calling the worshippers together; since noise is a recognised
means of driving away spirits, probably in consequence of its effect in
frightening wild animals. It is for the same end that music is essential at
weddings, especially during the night when the spirits are more potent; and
this is the primary object of the continuous discordant din which the Hindus
consider a necessary accompaniment to a wedding.

Except for this ceremonial strictness Hinduism should have been favourable
to the development of both painting and sculpture, as being a polytheistic
religion. In the early stages of society religion and art are intimately
connected, as is shown by the fact that images and paintings are at first
nearly always of deities or sacred persons or animals, and it is only after a
considerable period of development that secular subjects are treated.
Similarly architecture is in its commencement found to be applied solely to
sacred buildings, as temples and churches, and is only gradually diverted to
secular buildings. The figures sculptured by the Mochis are usually images
for temples, and those who practise this art are called Murtikar, from murti,
an image or idol; and the pictures of the Chitrakārs were until recently all of
deities or divine animals, though secular paintings may now occasionally be
met with. And the uneducated believers in a polytheistic religion regularly
take the image for the deity himself, at first scarcely conceiving of the one
apart from the other. Thus some Bharewas or brass-workers say that they
dare not make metal images of the gods, because they are afraid that the
badness of their handiwork might arouse the wrath of the gods and move
them to take revenge. The surmise might in fact be almost justifiable that the
end to which figures of men and animals were first drawn or painted, or
modelled in clay or metal was that they might be worshipped as images of
the deities, the savage mind not distinguishing at all between an image of the
god and the god himself. For this reason monotheistic religions would be
severely antagonistic to the arts, and such is in fact the case. Thus the

Page 312

Muhammadan commentary, the Hadith, has a verse: “Woe to him who has
painted a living creature! At the day of the last judgment the persons
represented by him will come out of the tomb and join themselves to him to
demand of him a soul. Then that man, unable to give life to his work, will
burn in eternal flames.” And in Judaism the familiar prohibition of the
Second Commandment appears to be directed to the same end.

Page 313

Image of the god Vishnu as Vithoba

Hindu sculpture has indeed been fairly prolific, but is not generally
considered to have attained to any degree of artistic merit. Since sculpture is
mainly concerned with the human form it seems clear that an appreciation of
the beauty of muscular strength and the symmetrical development of the

Page 314

limbs is an essential preliminary to success in this art; and such a feeling can
only arise among a people who set much store on feats of bodily strength
and agility. This has never been the character of the Hindus, whose religion
encourages asceticism and mortification of the body, and points to mental
self-absorption and detachment from worldly cares and exercises as the
highest type of virtue.

4. Antagonism of Mochis and Chamārs

As a natural result of the pretensions to nobility made by the Mochis, there is
no love lost between them and the Chamārs; and the latter allege that the
Mochis have stolen their rāmpi, the knife with which they cut leather. On
this account the Chamārs will neither take water to drink from the Mochis
nor mend their shoes, and will not even permit them to try on a new pair of
shoes until they have paid the price set on them; for they say that the Mochis
are half-bred Chamārs and therefore cannot be permitted to defile the shoes
of a true Chamār by trying them on; but when they have been paid for, the
maker has severed connection with them, and the use to which they may be
put no longer affects him.

5. Exogamous groups

In the Central Provinces the Mochis are said to have forty exogamous
sections or gotras, of which the bulk are named after all the well-known
Rājpūt clans, while two agree with those of the Chamārs. And they have also
an equal number of kheras or groups named after villages. The limits of the
two groups seem to be identical; thus members of the sept named after the
Kachhwāha Rājpūts say that their khera or village name is Mungāvali in
Gwālior; those of the Ghangere sept give Chanderi as their khera, the

Page 315

Sitāwat sept Dhāmoni in Saugor, the Didoria Chhatarpur, the Narele Narwar,
and so on. The names of the village groups have now been generally
forgotten and they are said to have no influence on marriage, which is
regulated by the Rājpūt sept names; but it seems probable that the kheras
were the original divisions and the Rājpūt gotras have been more recently
adopted in support of the claims already noticed.

6. Social customs

The Mochis have adopted the customs of the higher Hindu castes. A man
may not take a wife from his own gotra, his mother’s gotra or from a family
into which a girl from his own family has married. They usually marry their
daughters in childhood and employ Brāhmans in their ceremonies, and no
degradation attaches to these latter for serving as their priests. In minor
domestic ceremonies for which the Brāhman is not engaged his place is
taken by a relative, who is called sawāsa, and is either the sister’s husband,
daughter’s husband, or father’s sister’s husband, of the head of the family.
They permit widow-remarriage and divorce, and in the southern Districts
effect a divorce by laying a pestle between the wife and husband. They burn
their dead and observe mourning for the usual period. After a death they will
not again put on a coloured head-cloth until some relative sets it on their
heads for the first time on the expiry of the period of mourning. They revere
the ordinary Hindu deities, and like the Chamārs they have a family god,
known as Mair, whose representation in the shape of a lump of clay is
enshrined within the house and worshipped at marriages and deaths. In
Saugor he is said to be the collective representative of the spirits of their
ancestors. In some localities they eat flesh and drink liquor, but in others
abstain from both. Among the Hindus the Mochis rank considerably higher
than the Chamārs; their touch does not defile and they are permitted to enter
temples and take part in religious ceremonies. The name of a Saugor Mochi
is remembered who became a good drawer and painter and was held in much
esteem at the Peshwa’s court. In northern India about half the Mochis are
Muhammadans, but in the Central Provinces they are all Hindus.

Page 316

7. Shoes

In view of the fact that many of the Mochis were Muhammadans and that
slippers are mainly a Muhammadan article of attire Buchanan thought it
probable that they were brought into India by the invaders, the Hindus
having previously been content with sandals and wooden shoes. He wrote:
“Many Hindus now use leather slippers, but some adhere to the proper
custom of wearing sandals, which have wooden soles, a strap of leather to
pass over the instep, and a wooden or horn peg with a button on its top. The
foot is passed through the strap and the peg is placed between two of the
toes.”5 It is certain, however, that leather shoes and slippers were known to
the Hindus from a fairly early period: “The episode related in the Rāmāyana
of Bhārata placing on the vacant throne of Ajodhya a pair of Rāma’s
slippers, which he worshipped during the latter’s protracted exile, shows that
shoes were important articles of wear and worthy of attention. In Manu and
the Mahābhārata slippers are also mentioned and the time and mode of
putting them on pointed out. The Vishnu Purāna enjoins all who wish to
protect their persons never to be without leather shoes. Manu in one place
expresses great repugnance to stepping into another’s shoes and
peremptorily forbids it, and the Purānas recommend the use of shoes when
walking out of the house, particularly in thorny places and on hot sand.”6
Thus shoes were certainly worn by the Hindus before Muhammadan times,
though loose slippers may have been brought into fashion by the latter. And
it seems possible that the Mochis may have adopted Islām, partly to obtain
the patronage of the followers of the new religion, and also to escape from
the degraded position to which their profession of leather-working was
relegated by Hinduism and to dissociate themselves from the Chamārs.

1 This article is partly based on papers by Mr. Gopal Parmanand, Deputy Inspector of Schools,
Saugor, and Mr. Shamsuddīn, Sub-Inspector, City Police, Saugor.
2 Brief View.

Page 317

3 Bombay Ethnographic Survey Draft Monograph on Jīngar.

4 Tribes and Castes of Bengal, art. Mochi.
5 Eastern India, vol. iii. p. 105.

6 Rājendra Lāl Mitra, Indo-Aryans, vol. i. pp. 222, 223.

Page 318

Mowār
Mowār.—A small caste of cultivators found in the Chhattīsgarh country, in
the Raipur and Bilāspur Districts and the Raigarh State. They numbered
2500 persons in 1901. The derivation of the name is obscure, but they
themselves say that it is derived from Mow or Mowagarh, a town in the
Jhānsi District of the United Provinces, and they also call themselves
Mahuwār or the inhabitants of Mow. They say that the Rāja of Mowagarh,
under whom they were serving, desired to marry the daughter of one of their
Sirdārs (headmen), because she was extremely beautiful, but her father
refused, and when the Rāja persisted in his desire they left the place in a
body and came to Ratanpur in the time of Rāja Bīmbaji, in A.D. 1770. A
Bilāspur writer states that the Mowārs are an offshoot from the Rajwār
Rājpūts of Sargūja State. Colonel Dalton writes1 of the Rajwār Rājpūts of
Sargūja and other adjoining States that they are peaceably disposed
cultivators, who declare themselves to be fallen Kshatriyas; but he remarks
later that they are probably aborigines, as they do not conform to Hindu
customs, and they are skilled in a dance called Chailo, which he considers to
be of Dravidian origin. In another place he remarks that the Rajwārs of
Bengal admit that they are derived from the miscegenation of Kurmis and
Kols. The fact that the Mowārs of Sārangarh make a representation of a bow
and arrow on their documents, instead of signing their names, affords some
support to the theory that they are probably a branch of one of the aboriginal
tribes. The name may be derived from mowa, a radish, as the Mowārs of
Bilāspur are engaged principally in garden cultivation.

The Mowārs have no subcastes, but are divided into a number of exogamous
groups, principally of a totemistic nature. Those of the Sūrajha or sun sept
throw away their earthen pots on the occasion of an eclipse, and those of the
Hataia or elephant sept will not ride on an elephant and worship that animal
at the Dasahra festival. Members of other septs named after the cobra, the
crow, the monkey and the tiger will not kill their totem animal, and when
they see the dead body of one of its species they throw away their earthen

Page 319

cooking-pots as a sign of mourning. The marriage of persons belonging to
the same sept and also that of first cousins is prohibited. If an unmarried girl
is seduced by a man of the caste she becomes his wife and is not expelled,
but the caste will not eat food cooked by her. But a girl going wrong with an
outsider is finally cast out. The marriage and other social customs resemble
those of the Kurmis. The caste employ Brāhmans at their ceremonies and
have a great regard for them. Their gurus or spiritual preceptors are Bairāgis
and Gosains. They eat the flesh of clean animals and a few drink liquor, but
most of them abstain from it. Their women are tattooed on the arms and
hands with figures intended to represent deer, flies and other animals and
insects. The caste say that they were formerly employed as soldiers under
the native chiefs, but they are now all cultivators. They grow all kinds of
grain and vegetables, except turmeric and onions. A few of them are
landowners, and the majority tenants. Very few are constrained to labour for
hire. In appearance the men are generally strong and healthy, and of a dark
complexion.

1 Ethnology of Bengal, p. 326.

Page 320

Murha

1. Origin of the caste

Murha.—A Dravidian, caste of navvies and labourers found in Jubbulpore
and the adjoining Districts, to the number of about 1500 persons. The name
Murha has been held to show that the caste are connected with the Munda
tribe. The Murhas, however, call themselves also Khare Bind Kewat and
Lunia or Nunia (salt-maker), and in Jubbulpore they give these two names as
subdivisions of the caste. And these names indicate that the caste are an
offshoot of the large Bind tribe of Bengal and northern India, though in parts
of the Central Provinces they have probably been recruited from the Kols or
Mundas. Sir H. Risley1 records a story related by the Binds to the effect that
they and the Nunias were formerly one, and that the existing Nunias are
descended from a Bind who consented to dig a grave for a Muhammadan
king and was put out of caste for doing so. And he remarks that the Binds
may be a true primitive tribe and the Nunias a functional group differentiated
from them by taking to the manufacture of earth salt. This explanation of the
relationship of the Binds and Nunias seems almost certainly correct. In the
United Provinces the Binds are divided into the Khare and Dhusia or first
and second subcastes, and the Khare Binds also call themselves Kewat.2 And
the Murhas of Narsinghpur call themselves Khare Bind Kewats, though the
other Kewats repudiate all connection with them. There seems thus to be no
doubt that the Murhas of these Provinces are another offshoot of the Bind
tribe like the Nunias, who have taken up the profession of navvies and
earthworkers and thus become a separate caste. Mr. Hīra Lāl notes that the
Narsinghpur District contains a village Nonia, which is inhabited solely by
Murhas who call themselves Khare Bind Kewat. As the village is no doubt
named Nonia or Nunia after them, we thus have an instance of all the three

Page 321

designations being applied to the same set of persons. The Murhas say that
they came into Narsinghpur from Rewah, and they still speak the Bagheli
dialect, though the current vernacular of the locality is Bundeli. The Binds
themselves derive their name from the Vindhya (Bindhya) hills.3 They relate
that a traveller passing by the Vindhya hills heard a strange flute-like sound
coming out of a clump of bamboos. He cut a shoot and took from it a fleshy
substance, which afterwards grew into a man, the supposed ancestor of the
Binds. In Mandla the Murhas say that the difference between themselves and
the Nunias is that the latter make field-embankments and other earthwork,
while the Murhas work in stone and build bridges. According to their own
story they were brought to Mandla from their home in Eastern Oudh more
than ten generations ago by a Gond king of the Garha-Mandla dynasty for
the purpose of building his fort or castle. He gave them two villages for their
maintenance which they have now lost. The caste has, however, probably
received some local accretions and in Mandla some Murhas appear to be
Kols; members of this tribe are generally above the average in bodily
strength and are in considerable request for employment on earth- and stone-
work.

2. Marriage customs

In Narsinghpur the Murhas appear to have no regular exogamous divisions.
Some of them remember the names of their kheros or ancestral villages and
do not marry with families belonging to the same khero, but this is not a
regular rule of the caste. Generally speaking, persons descended through
males from a common ancestor do not intermarry so long as they remember
the relationship. In Mandla they have five divisions, of which the highest is
Pūrbia. The name Pūrbia (Eastern) is commonly applied in the Central
Provinces to persons coming from Oudh, and in this case the Pūrbia Murhas
are probably the latest immigrants from home and have a superior status on
this account. Up till recently they practised hypergamy with the other
groups, taking daughters from them in marriage, but not giving their
daughters to them. This rule is now, however, breaking down on account of

Page 322

the difficulty they find in getting their daughters married. The children of
brothers and sisters may marry in some places, but in others neither they nor
their children may marry with each other. Anta Sānta or the exchange of girls
between two families is permitted. The bridegroom’s father has to pay from
five to twenty rupees as a chari or bride-price to the girl’s father, which sum
is regarded as the remuneration of the latter for having brought up his
daughter. In the case of the daughter of a headman the bride-price is
sometimes as high as Rs. 150. In Damoh a curious survival of marriage by
capture remains. The bridegroom’s party give a ram or he-goat to the bride’s
party and these take it to their shed, cut its head off and hang it by the side of
the khām or marriage-pole. The brother-in-law of the bridegroom or of his
father then sallies forth to bring back the head of the animal, but is opposed
by the women of the bride’s party, who belabour him and his friends with
sticks, brooms and rolling-pins. But in the end the head is always taken
away. The binding portion of the marriage is the bhānwar or walking round
the sacred post. When the bride is leaving for her husband’s house the
women of her party take seven balls of flour with burning wicks thrust into
them, and place them in a winnowing-fan. They wave this round the bride’s
head and then throw the balls and after them the fan over the litter in which
the bride is seated. The bridegroom’s party must catch the fan, and if they let
it fall to the ground they are much laughed at for their clumsiness. When the
pair arrive at the bridegroom’s house, the fan is again waved over their
heads; and a cloth is spread before the house, on which seven burning wicks
are placed like the previous ones. The bride walks quickly over the cloth to
the house and the bridegroom must keep pace with her, picking up the
burning flour balls as he goes. When the pair arrive at the house the
bridegroom’s sister shuts the door and will not open it until she is given a
present. Divorce and the remarriage of widows are permitted.

3. Funeral rites

The caste worship the ordinary Hindu deities. Well-to-do members burn their
dead and the poorer ones bury them. The corpse is usually placed with the

Page 323

head to the south as is the custom among the primitive tribes, but in some
localities the Hindu fashion of laying the head to the north has been adopted.
Two pice are thrown down by the grave or burning-ghāt to buy the site, and
these are taken by the sweeper. The ashes are collected on the third day and
thrown into a river. The usual period of mourning is only three days, but it is
sometimes extended to nine days when the chief mourner is unable to feed
the caste-fellows on the third day, and the feast may in case of necessity be
postponed to any time within six months of the death. The chief mourner
puts on a new white cloth and eats nothing but rice and pulse without salt.

4. Occupation

The caste are employed on all kinds of earthwork, such as building walls,
excavating trenches, and making embankments in fields. Their trade
implements consist of a pickaxe, a basket, and a thin wooden hod to fill the
earth into the basket. The Murha invokes these as follows: “Oh! my lord the
basket, my lord the pickaxe shaped like a snake, and my lady the hod, come
and eat up those who do not pay me for my work!” The Murhas are strict in
their rules about food and will not accept cooked food even from a Brāhman,
but notwithstanding this, their social position is so low that not even a
sweeper would take food from them. The caste eat flesh and drink liquor, but
abstain from fowls, pork and beef. They engage Brāhmans on the occasion
of births and marriages, but not usually for funerals. The women tattoo their
bodies after marriage, and the charge for this should always be paid by the
maternal uncle’s wife, the paternal aunt, or some other similar relation of the
girl. The fact that among most Hindus a girl must be tattooed before leaving
for her husband’s house, and that the cost of the operation must always be
paid for by her own family, seems to indicate that tattooing was formerly a
rite of puberty for the female sex. A wife must not mention the name of her
husband or of any person who stands in the relation of father, mother, uncle
or aunt to him. Parents do not call their eldest son by his proper name, but by
some pet name. Women are impure for five days during menstruation and
are not allowed to cook for that period. The Murhas have a caste panchāyat

Page 324

or committee, the head of which is known as Patel or Mukhia, the office
being hereditary. He receives a part of all fines levied for the commission of
social offences. In appearance the caste are dark and short of stature, and
have some resemblance to the Kols.

Coolie women with babies slung at the side

5. Women’s song

In conclusion, I reproduce one of the songs which the women sing as they
are carrying the basketfuls of earth or stones at their work; in the original
each line consists of two parts, the last words of which sometimes rhyme
with each other:

Our mother Nerbudda is very kind; blow, wind, we are hot with
labour.
He said to the Maina: Go, carry my message to my love.

Page 325

The red ants climb up the mango-tree; and the daughter follows her
mother’s way.
I have no money to give her even lime and tobacco; I am poor, so
how can I tell her of my love.
The boat has gone down on the flood of the Nerbudda; the
fisherwoman is weeping for her husband.
She has no bangles on her arm nor necklace on her neck; she has no
beauty, but seeks her lovers throughout the village.
Bread from the girdle, curry from the lota; let us go, beloved, the
moon is shining.
The leaves of gram have been plucked from the plants; I think much
on Dadaria, but she does not come.
The love of a stranger is as a dream; think not of him, beloved, he
cannot be yours.
Twelve has struck and it is thirteen time (past the time of labour); oh,
overseer, let your poor labourers go.
The betel-leaf is pressed in the mouth (and gives pleasure); attractive
eyes delight the heart.
Catechu, areca and black cloves; my heart’s secret troubles me in my
dreams.
The Nerbudda came and swept away the rubbish (from the works);
fly away, bees, do not perch on my cloth.
The colour does not come on the wheat; her youth is passing, but she
cannot yet drape her cloth on her body.
Like the sight of rain-drops splashing on the ground; so beautiful is
she to look upon.
It rains and the hidden streams in the woodland are filled (and come
to view); hide as long as you may, some day you must be seen.
The mahua flowers are falling from the trees on the hill; leave me
your cloth so that I may know you will return.
He went to the bazār and brought back a cocoanut; it is green
without, but insects are eating the core.
He went to the hill and cut strings of bamboo; you cannot drape your
cloth, you have wound it round your body.
The coral necklace hangs on the peg; if you become the second wife
of my husband I shall give you clothes.

Page 326

She put on her clothes and went to the forest; she met her lover and
said you are welcome to me.
He went to the bazār and bought potatoes; but if he had loved me he
would have brought me liquor.
The fish in the river are on the look-out; the Brāhman’s daughter is
bathing with her hair down.
The arhar-stumps stand in the field; I loved one of another caste, but
must give him up.
He ate betel and coloured his teeth; his beloved came from without
and knew him.
The ploughmen are gone to the field; my clever writer is gone to the
court-house.
The Nerbudda flows like a bent bow; a beautiful youth is standing in
court.4
The broken areca-nuts lie in the forest; when a man comes to
misfortune no one will help him.
The broken areca-nuts cannot be mended; and two hearts which are
sundered cannot be joined.
Ask me for five rupees and I will give you twenty-five; but I will not
give my lover for the whole world.
I will put bangles on my arm; when the other wife sees me she will
die of jealousy.
Break the bangles which your husband gave you; and put others on
your wrists in my name.
O my lover, give me bangles; make me armlets, for I am content
with you.
My lover went to the bazār at Lakhanpur; but he has not brought me
even a choli5 that I liked.
I had gone to the bazār and bought fish; she is so ugly that the flies
would not settle on her.

1 Tribes and Castes of Bengal, art. Bind.
2 Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, art. Bind.

3 Tribes and Castes of Bengal, loc. cit.

Page 327

4 The clever writer referred to in the preceding line.

5 Breast-cloth.

Page 328

Nagasia
Nagasia, Naksia.—A primitive tribe found principally in the Chota Nāgpur
States. They now number 16,000 persons in the Central Provinces, being
returned almost entirely from Jashpur and Sargūja. The census returns are,
however, liable to be inaccurate as the Nagasias frequently call themselves
Kisān, a term which is also applied to the Oraons. The Nagasias say that they
are the true Kisāns whereas the Oraons are only so by occupation. The
Oraons, on the other hand, call the Nagasias Kisāda. The tribe derive their
name from the Nāg or cobra, and they say that somebody left an infant in the
forest of Setambu and a cobra came and spread its hood over the child to
protect him from the rays of the sun. Some Mundas happened to pass by and
on seeing this curious sight they thought the child must be destined to
greatness, so they took him home and made him their king, calling him
Nagasia, and from him the tribe are descended. The episode of the snake is,
of course, a stock legend related by many tribes, but the story appears to
indicate that the Nagasias are an offshoot of the Mundas; and this hypothesis
is strengthened by the fact that Nāgbasia is often used as an alternative name
for the Mundas by their Hindu neighbours. The term Nāgbasia is supposed
to mean the original settlers (basia) in Nāg (Chota Nāgpur).

The tribe are divided into the Telha, Dhuria and Senduria groups. The Telhas
are so called because at the marriage ceremony they mark the forehead of
the bride with tel (oil), while the Dhurias instead of oil use dust (dhur) taken
from the sole of the bridegroom’s foot, and the Sendurias like most Hindu
castes employ vermilion (sendur) for this purpose. The Telhas and Dhurias
marry with each other, but not with the Sendūrias, who consider themselves
to be superior to the others and use the term Nāgbansia or ‘Descendants of
the Snake’ as their tribal name. The Telha and Dhuria women do not wear
glass bangles on their arms but only bracelets of brass, while the Sendurias
wear glass bangles and also armlets above the elbow. Telha women do not
wear nose-rings or tattoo their bodies, while the Sendūrias do both. The
Telhas say that the tattooing needle and vermilion, which they formerly

Page 329

employed in their marriages, were stolen from them by Wāgdeo or the tiger
god. So they hit upon sesamum oil as a substitute, which must be pressed for
ceremonial purposes in a bamboo basket by unmarried boys using a plough-
yoke. This is probably, Mr. Hīra Lāl remarks, merely the primitive method of
extracting oil, prior to the invention of the Teli’s ghāni or oil-press; and the
practice is an instance of the common rule that articles employed in
ceremonial and religious rites should be prepared by the ancient and
primitive methods which for ordinary purposes have been superseded by
more recent labour-saving inventions.

Page 330

Nāhal

1. The tribe and its subdivisions

Nāhal, Nihāl.1—A forest tribe who are probably a mixture of Bhīls and
Korkus. In 1911 they numbered 12,000 persons, of whom 8000 belonged to
the Hoshangābād, Nimār and Betūl Districts, and nearly 4000 to Berār. They
were classed at the census as a subtribe of Korkus. According to one story
they are descended from a Bhīl father and a Korku mother, and the writer of
the Khāndesh Gazetteer calls them the most savage of the Bhīls. But in the
Central Provinces their family or sept names are the same as those of the
Korkus, and they speak the Korku language. Mr. Kitts2 says that the Korkus
who first went to Berār found the Nāhals in possession of the Melghāt hills.
Gradually the latter caste lost their power and became the village drudges of
the former. He adds that the Nāhals were fast losing their language, and the
younger generation spoke only Korku. The two tribes were very friendly,
and the Nāhals acknowledged the superior position of the Korkus. This, if it
accurately represents the state of things prevailing for a long period, and was
not merely an incidental feature of their relative position at the time Mr.
Kitts’ observations were made, would tend to show that the Nāhals were the
older tribe and had been subjected by the Korkus, just as the Korkus
themselves and the Baigas have given way to the Gonds. Mr. Crosthwaite
also states that the Nāhal is the drudge of the Korku and belongs to a race
which is supposed to have been glorious before the Korku star arose, and
which is now fast dying out. In any case there is no doubt that the Nāhals are
a very mixed tribe, as they will even now admit into the community Gonds,
Korkus and nearly all the Hindu castes, though in some localities they will
not eat from the other tribes and the lower Hindu castes and therefore refuse
to admit them. There are, moreover, two subdivisions of the caste called

Page 331

Korku and Marāthi Nāhals respectively. The latter are more Hinduised than
the former and disclaim any connection with the Korkus. The Nāhals have
totemistic exogamous septs. Those of the Kāsa sept worship a tortoise and
also a bell-metal plate, which is their family god. They never eat off a bell-
metal plate except on one day in the month of Māgh (January), when they
worship it. The members of the Nāgbel sept worship the betel-vine or
‘snake-creeper,’ and refrain from chewing betel-leaves, and they also
worship the Nāg or cobra and do not kill it, thus having a sort of double
totem. The Bhawaria sept, named after the bhaunr or black bee, do not eat
honey, and if they see a person taking the honey-comb from a nest they will
run away. The Khadia sept worship the spirits of their ancestors enshrined in
a heap of stones (khad), or according to another account they worship a
snake which sits on a heap of pebbles. The Surja sept worship Sūrya or the
sun by offering him a fowl in the month of Pūs (December-January), and
some members of the sept keep a fast every Sunday. The Saoner sept
worship the san or flax plant.

2. Marriage

Marriage is prohibited between members of the same sept, but there are no
other restrictions and first cousins may marry. Both sexes usually marry
when adult, and sexual license before wedlock is tolerated. A Brāhman is
employed only for fixing the date of the ceremony. The principal part of the
marriage is the knotting together of the bride’s and bridegroom’s clothes on
two successive days. They also gamble with tamarind seeds, and it is
considered a lucky union if the bridegroom wins. A bride-price is usually
paid consisting of Rs. 1–4 to Rs. 5 in cash, some grain and a piece of cloth
for the bride’s mother. The remarriage of widows is allowed, and the couple
go five times round a bamboo stick which is held up to represent a spear, the
ceremony being called barchhi se bhānwar phirna or the marriage of the
spear.

Page 332

3. Religion

The Nāhals worship the forest god called Jhārkhandi in the month of Chait,
and until this rite has been performed they do not use the leaves or fruits of
the palās,3 aonlā4 or mango trees. When the god is worshipped they collect
branches and leaves of these trees and offer cooked food to them and
thereafter commence using the new leaves, and the fruit and timber. They
also worship the ordinary village godlings. The dead are buried, except in
the case of members of the Surja or sun sept, whose corpses are burnt.
Cooked food is offered at the grave for four days after the death.

4. Occupation

The Nāhals were formerly a community of hill-robbers, ‘Nāhal, Bhīl, Koli’
being the phrase generally used in old documents to designate the marauding
bands of the western Satpūra hills. The Rāja of Jītgarh and Mohkot in Nimār
has a long account in his genealogy of a treacherous massacre of a whole
tribe of Nāhals by his ancestor in Akbar’s time, in recognition of which the
Jītgarh pargana was granted to the family. Mr. Kitts speaks of the Nāhals of
Berār as having once been much addicted to cattle-lifting, and this
propensity still exists in a minor degree in the Central Provinces, accentuated
probably by the fact that a considerable number of Nāhals follow the
occupation of graziers. Some of them are also village watchmen, and another
special avocation of theirs is the collection of the oil of the marking-nut tree
(Semecarpus anacardium). This is to some extent a dangerous trade, as the
oil causes swellings on the body, besides staining the skin and leaving a
peculiar odour. The workers wrap a fourfold layer of cloth round their
fingers with ashes between each fold, while the rest of the body is also

Page 333

protected by cloth when gathering the nuts and pounding them to extract the
oil. At the end of the day’s work powdered tamarind and ghī are rubbed on
the whole body. The oil is a stimulant, and is given to women after delivery
and to persons suffering from rheumatism.

5. Social status

The social status of the Nāhals is very low and they eat the flesh of almost
all animals, while those who graze cattle eat beef. Cow-killing is not
regarded as an offence. They are also dirty and do not bathe for weeks
together. To get maggots in a wound is, however, regarded as a grave
offence, and the sufferer is put out of the village and has to live alone until
he recovers.

1 This article is mainly compiled from papers by Mr. Hīra Lāl and Bābu Gulāb Singh,
Superintendent of Land Records, Betūl.

2 Berār Census Report (1881), p. 158.
3 Butea frondosa.

4 Phyllanthus emiblica.

Page 334

Nai
List of Paragraphs

1. Structure of the caste
2. Marriage and other customs
3. Occupation
4. Other services
5. Duties at weddings
6. The barber-surgeon
7. A barber at the court of Oudh
8. Character and position of the barber
9. Beliefs about hair
10. Hair of kings and priests
11. The beard
12. Significance of removal of the hair and shaving the head
13. Shaving the head by mourners
14. Hair offerings
15. Keeping hair unshorn during a vow
16. Disposal of cut hair and nails
17. Superstitions about shaving the hair
18. Reasons why the hair was considered the source of strength

1. Structure of the caste

Nai, Nao, Mhāli, Hajjām, Bhanāri, Mangala.1—The occupational caste of
barbers. The name is said to be derived from the Sanskrit nāpita according to
some a corruption of snāpitri, one who bathes. In Bundelkhand he is also
known as Khawās, which was a title for the attendant on a grandee; and

Page 335

Birtiya, or ‘He that gets his maintenance (vritti) from his constituents.’2
Mhāli is the Marāthi name for the caste, Bhandāri the Uriya name and
Mangala the Telugu name. The caste numbered nearly 190,000 persons in
the Central Provinces in 1911, being distributed over all Districts. Various
legends of the usual type are related of its origin, but, as Sir. H. Risley
observes, it is no doubt wholly of a functional character. The subcastes in the
Central Provinces entirely bear out this view, as they are very numerous and
principally of the territorial type: Telange of the Telugu country, Marāthe,
Pardeshi or northerners, Jhāria or those of the forest country of the
Wainganga Valley, Bandhaiya or those of Bāndhogarh, Barāde of Berār,
Bundelkhandi, Mārwāri, Mathuria from Mathura, Gadhwarīa from Garha
near Jubbulpore, Lānjia from Lānji in Bālāghāt, Mālwi from Mālwa, Nimāri
from Nimār, Deccane, Gujarāti, and so on. Twenty-six divisions in all are
given. The exogamous groups are also of different types, some of them
being named after Brāhman saints, as Gautam, Kashyap, Kosil, Sandil and
Bhāradwāj; others after Rājpūt clans as Sūrajvansi, Jāduvansi, Solanki and
Panwār; while others are titular or totemistic, as Nāik, leader; Seth, banker;
Rāwat, chief; Nāgesh, cobra; Bāgh, a tiger; Bhādrawa, a fish.

2. Marriage and other customs

The exogamous groups are known as khero or kul, and marriage between
members of the same group is prohibited. Girls are usually wedded between
the ages of eight and twelve and boys between fifteen and twenty. A girl who
goes wrong before marriage is finally expelled from the caste. The wedding
ceremony follows the ritual prevalent in the locality as described in the
articles on Kurmi and Kunbi. At an ordinary wedding the expenses on the
girl’s side amount to about Rs. 150, and on the boy’s to Rs. 200. The
remarriage of widows is permitted. In the northern Districts the widow may
wed the younger brother of her deceased husband, but in the Marātha
country she may not be married to any of his relatives. Divorce may be
effected at the instance of the husband before the caste committee, and a
divorced woman is at liberty to marry again. The Nais worship all the

Page 336

ordinary Hindu deities. On the Dasahra and Diwāli festivals they wash and
revere their implements, the razor, scissors and nail-pruners. They pay
regard to omens. It is unpropitious to sneeze or hear the report of a gun when
about to commence any business; and when a man is starting on a journey, if
a cat, a squirrel, a hare or a snake should cross the road in front of him he
will give it up and return home. The bodies of the dead are usually burnt. In
Chhattīsgarh the poor throw the corpses of their dead into the Mahānadi, and
the bodies of children dying under one year of age were until recently buried
in the courtyard of the house. The period of mourning for adults is ten days
and for children three days. The chief mourner must take only one meal a
day, which he cooks himself until the ceremony of the tenth day is
performed.

3. Occupation

“The barber’s trade,” Mr. Crooke states,3 “is undoubtedly of great antiquity.
In the Veda we read, ‘Sharpen us like the razor in the hands of the barber’;
and again, ‘Driven by the wind, Agni shaves the hair of the earth like the
barber shaving a beard.’” In early times they must have enjoyed considerable
dignity; Upali the barber was the first propounder of the law of the Buddhist
church. The village barber’s leather bag contains a small mirror (ārsi), a pair
of iron pincers (chimta), a leather strap, a comb (kanghi), a piece of cloth
about a yard square and some oil in a phial. He shaves the faces, heads and
armpits of his customers, and cuts the nails of both their hands and feet. He
uses cold water in summer and hot in winter, but no soap, though this has
now been introduced in towns. For the poorer cultivators he does a rapid
scrape, and this process is called ‘asūdhal’ or a ‘tearful shave,’ because the
person undergoing it is often constrained to weep. The barber acquires the
knowledge of his art by practice on the more obliging of his customers,
hence the proverb, ‘The barber’s son learns his trade on the heads of fools.’
The village barber is usually paid by a contribution of grain from the
cultivators, calculated in some cases according to the number of ploughs of
land possessed by each, in others according to the number of adult males in

Page 337

the family. In Saugor he receives 20 lbs. of grain annually for each adult
male or 22½ lbs. per plough of land, besides presents of a basket of grain at
seed-time and a sheaf at harvest. Cultivators are usually shaved about once a
fortnight. In towns the barber’s fee may vary from a pice to two annas for a
shave, which is, as has been seen, a much more protracted operation with a
Hindu than with a European. It is said that Berār is now so rich that even
ordinary cultivators can afford to pay the barber two annas (2d.) for a single
shave, or the same price as in the suburbs of London.

4. Other services

After he has shaved a client the barber pinches and rubs his arms, presses his
fingers together and cracks the joints of each finger, this last action being
perhaps meant to avert evil spirits. He also does massage, a very favourite
method of treatment in India, and also inexpensive as compared with
Europe. For one rupee a month in towns the barber will come and rub a
man’s legs five or ten minutes every day. Cultivators have their legs rubbed
in the sowing season, when the labour is intensely hard owing to the
necessity of sowing all the land in a short period. If a man is well-to-do he
may have his whole head and body rubbed with scented oil. Landowners
have often a barber as a family servant, the office descending from father to
son. Such a man will light his master’s chilam (pipe-bowl) or huqqa (water-
pipe), clean and light lamps, prepare his bed, tell his master stories to send
him to sleep, act as escort for the women of the family when they go on a
journey and arrange matches for the children. The barber’s wife attends on
women in child-birth after the days of pollution are over, and rubs oil on the
bodies of her clients, pares their nails and paints their feet with red dye at
marriages and on other festival occasions.

Page 338

5. Duties at weddings

The barber has also numerous and important duties4 in connection with
marriages and other festival occasions. He acts as the Brāhman’s assistant,
and to the lower castes, who cannot employ a Brāhman, he is himself the
matrimonial priest. The important part which he plays in marriage
ceremonies has led to his becoming the matchmaker among all respectable
castes. He searches for a suitable bride or bridegroom, and is often sent to
inspect the other party to a match and report his or her defects to his clients.
He may arrange the price or dowry, distribute the invitations and carry the
presents from one house to the other. He supplies the leaf-plates and cups
which are used at weddings, as the family’s stock of metal vessels is usually
quite inadequate for the number of guests. The price of these is about 4
annas (4d.) a hundred. He also provides the torans or strings of leaves which
are hung over the door of the house and round the marriage-shed. At the
feast the barber is present to hand to the guests water, betel-leaf and pipes as
they may desire. He also partakes of the food, seated at a short distance from
the guests, in the intervals of his service. He lights the lamps and carries the
torches during the ceremony. Hence he was known as Masālchi or torch-
bearer, a name now applied by Europeans to a menial servant who lights and
cleans the lamps and washes the plates after meals. The barber and his wife
act as prompters to the bride and bridegroom, and guide them through the
complicated ritual of the wedding ceremony, taking the couple on their knees
if they are children, and otherwise sitting behind them. The barber has a
prescriptive right to receive the clothes in which the bridegroom goes to the
bride’s house, as on the latter’s arrival he is always presented with new
clothes by the bride’s father. As the bridegroom’s clothes may be an
ancestral heirloom, a compact is often made to buy them back from the
barber, and he may receive as much as Rs. 50 in lieu of them. When the first
son is born in a family the barber takes a long bamboo stick, wraps it round
with cloth and puts an earthen pot over it and carries this round to the

Page 339

relatives, telling them the good news. He receives a small present from each
household.

6. The barber-surgeon

The barber also cleans the ears of his clients and cuts their nails, and is the
village surgeon in a small way. He cups and bleeds his patients, applies
leeches, takes out teeth and lances boils. In this capacity he is the counterpart
of the barber-surgeon of mediaeval Europe. The Hindu physicians are called
Baid, and are, as a rule, a class of Brāhmans. They derive their knowledge
from ancient Sanskrit treatises on medicine, which are considered to have
divine authority. Consequently they think it unnecessary to acquire fresh
knowledge by experiment and observation, as they suppose the perfect
science of medicine to be contained in their sacred books. As these books
probably do not describe surgical operations, of which little or nothing was
known at the time when they were written, and as surgery involves contact
with blood and other impure substances, the Baids do not practise it, and the
villagers are left to get on as best they can with the ministrations of the
barber. It is interesting to note that a similar state of things appears to have
prevailed in Europe. The monks were the early practitioners of medicine and
were forbidden to practise surgery, which was thus left to the barber-
chirurgeon. The status of the surgeon was thus for long much below that of
the physician.5 The mediaeval barber of Europe kept a bottle of blood in his
window, to indicate that he undertook bleeding and the application of
leeches, and the coloured bottles in the chemist’s window may have been
derived from this. It is also said that the barber’s pole originally served as a
support for the patient to lean on while he was being bled, and those barbers
who did the work of bleeding patients painted their poles in variegated red
and white stripes to show it.

Page 340

7. A barber at the court of Oudh

Perhaps the most successful barber known to Indian history was not a Hindu
at all, but a Peninsular and Oriental Company’s cabin-boy, who became the
barber of one of the last kings of Oudh, Nasīr-ud-Dīn, in the early part of the
nineteenth century, and rose to the position of a favourite courtier. He was
entrusted with the supply of every European article used at court, and by
degrees became a regular guest at the royal table, and sat down to take
dinner with the king as a matter of right; nor would his majesty taste a bottle
of wine opened by any other hands than the barber’s.6 This was, however, a
wise precaution as it turned out, since after he had finally been forced to part
with the barber the king was poisoned by his own relatives. The barber was
also made keeper of the royal menagerie, for which he supplied the animals
and their food, and made enormous profits. The following is an account of
the presentation of the barber’s monthly bill of expenses:7 “It was after tiffin,
or lunch, when we usually retired from the palace until dinner-time at nine
o’clock, that the favourite entered with a roll of paper in his hand. In India,
long documents, legal and commercial, are usually written, not in books or
on successive sheets, but on a long roll, strip being joined to strip for that
purpose, and the whole rolled up like a map.

“‘Ha, Khan!’ said the king, observing him; ‘the monthly bill, is it?’

“‘It is, your majesty,’ was the smiling reply.

“‘Come, out with it; let us see the extent. Unroll it, Khan.’

“The king was in a playful humour; and the barber was always in the same
mood as the king. He held the end of the roll in his hand, and threw the rest
along the floor, allowing it to unroll itself as it retreated. It reached to the
other side of the long apartment—a goodly array of items and figures,
closely written too. The king wanted it measured. A measure was brought

Page 341

and the bill was found to be four yards and a half long. I glanced at the
amount; it was upwards of Rs. 90,000, or £9000!”

The barber, however, encouraged the king in every form of dissipation and
excess, until the state of the Oudh court became such a scandal that the king
was forced by the British Government to dismiss him.8 He retired, it was
said, with a fortune of £240,000.

8. Character and position of the barber

The barber is also, Mr. Low writes,9 the scandal-bearer and gossip-monger
of the village. His cunning is proverbial, and he is known as Chhattīsa from
the saying—

Nai hai chhattīsa
Khai an ka pīsa,

or ‘A barber has thirty-six talents by which he eats at the expense of others.’
His loquacity is shown in the proverb, ‘As the crow among birds so the
barber among men.’ The barber and the professional Brāhman are considered
to be jealous of their perquisites and unwilling to share with their caste-
fellows, and this is exemplified in the proverb, “The barber, the dog and the
Brāhman, these three snarl at meeting one of their own kind.” The joint
association of the Brāhman priest and the barber with marriages and other
ceremonies has led to the saying, “As there are always reeds in a river so
there is always a barber with a Brāhman.” The barber’s astuteness is alluded
to in the saying, ‘Nine barbers are equal to seventy-two tailors.’ The fact that
it is the barber’s duty to carry the lights in marriage processions has led to
the proverb, “At the barber’s wedding all are gentlemen and it is awkward to
have to ask somebody to carry the torch.” The point of this is clear, though
no English equivalent occurs to the mind. And a similar idea is expressed by
‘The barber washes the feet of others but is ashamed to wash his own.’ It

Page 342

would appear from these proverbs that the Nai is considered to enjoy a social
position somewhat above his deserts. Owing to the nature of his duties,
which make him a familiar inmate of the household and bring him into
contact with the persons of his high-caste clients, the caste of the Nai is
necessarily considered to be a pure one and Brāhmans will take water from
his hands. But, on the other hand, his calling is that of a village menial and
has also some elements of impurity, as in cupping which involves contact
with blood, and in cutting the nails and hair of the corpse before cremation.
He is thus looked down upon as a menial and also considered as to some
extent impure. No member of a cultivating caste would salute a barber first
or look upon him as an equal, though Brāhmans put them on the same level
of ceremonial purity by taking water from both. The barber’s loquacity and
assurance have been made famous by the Arabian Nights, but they have
perhaps been affected by the more strenuous character of life, and his
conversation does not flow so freely as it did. Often he now confines himself
to approving and adding emphasis to any remarks of the patron and greeting
any of his little witticisms with bursts of obsequious laughter. In Madras, Mr.
Pandiān states, the village barber, like the washerman, is known as the son of
the village. If a customer does not pay him his dues, he lies low, and when
he has begun to shave the defaulter, engages him in a dispute and says
something to excite his anger. The latter will then become abusive to the
barber, whom he regards as a menial, and perhaps strike him, and this gives
the barber an opportunity to stop shaving him and rush off to lay a complaint
at the village court-house, leaving his enemy to proceed home with half his
head shaved and thus exposed to general ridicule.10

9. Beliefs about hair

Numerous customs appear to indicate that the hair was regarded as the
special seat of bodily strength. The Rājpūt warriors formerly wore their hair
long and never cut it, but trained it in locks over their shoulders. Similarly
the Marātha soldiers wore their hair long. The Hatkars, a class of Marātha
spearmen, might never cut their hair while engaged on military service. A

Page 343

Sikh writer states of Guru Govind, the founder of the militant Sikh
confederacy: “He appeared as the tenth Avatār (incarnation of Vishnu). He
established the Khālsa, his own sect, and by exhibiting singular energy,
leaving the hair on his head, and seizing the scimitar, he smote every wicked
person.”11 As is well known, no Sikh may cut his hair, and one of the five
marks of the Sikh is the kanga or comb, which he must always carry in order
to keep his hair in proper order. A proverb states that ‘The origin of a Sikh is
in his hair.’12 The following story, related by Sir J. Malcolm, shows the vital
importance attached by the Sikh to his hair and beard: “Three inferior agents
of Sikh chiefs were one day in my tent. I was laughing and joking with one
of them, a Khālsa Sikh, who said he had been ordered to attend me to
Calcutta. Among other subjects of our mirth I rallied him on trusting himself
so much in my power. ‘Why, what is the worst,’ he said, ‘that you can do to
me?’ I passed my hand across my chin, imitating the act of shaving. The
man’s face was in an instant distorted with rage and his sword half-drawn.
‘You are ignorant,’ he said to me, ‘of the offence you have given; I cannot
strike you who are above me, and the friend of my master and the state; but
no power,’ he added, indicating the Khālsa Sikhs, ‘shall save these fellows
who dared to smile at your action.’ It was with the greatest difficulty and
only by the good offices of some Sikh Chiefs that I was able to pacify his
wounded honour.”13 These instances appear to show clearly that the Sikhs
considered their hair of vital importance; and as fighting was their object in
life, it seems most probable that they thought their strength in war was
bound up in it. Similarly when the ancient Spartans were on a military
expedition purple garments were worn and their hair was carefully decked
with wreaths, a thing which was never done at home.14 And when Leonidas
and his three hundred were holding the pass of Thermopylae, and Xerxes
sent scouts to ascertain what the Greeks were doing in their camp, the report
was that some of them were engaged in gymnastics and warlike exercises,
while others were merely sitting and combing their long hair. If the
hypothesis already suggested is correct, the Spartan youths so engaged were
perhaps not merely adorning themselves for death, but, as they thought,
obtaining their full strength for battle. “The custom of keeping the hair
unshorn during a dangerous expedition appears to have been observed, at
least occasionally, by the Romans. Achilles kept unshorn his yellow hair,

Page 344

because his father had vowed to offer it to the river Sperchius if ever his son
came home from the wars beyond the sea.”15

When the Bhīls turned out to fight they let down their long hair prior to
beginning the conflict with their bows and arrows.16 The pirates of Surat,
before boarding a ship, drank bhāng and hemp-liquor, and when they wore
their long hair loose they gave no quarter.17 The Mundas appear to have
formerly worn their hair long and some still do. Those who are converted to
Christianity must cut their hair, but a non-Christian Munda must always
keep the chundi or pigtail. If the chundi is very long it is sometimes tied up
in a knot.18 Similarly the Oraons wore their hair long like women, gathered
in a knot behind, with a wooden or iron comb in it. Those who are Christians
can be recognised by the fact that they have cut off their pigtails. A man of
the low Pārdhi caste of hunters must never have his hair touched by a razor
after he has once killed a deer. As already seen, every orthodox Hindu wore
till recently a choti or scalp-lock, which should theoretically be as long as a
cow’s tail. Perhaps the idea was that for those who were not warriors it was
sufficient to retain this and have the rest of the head shaved. The choti was
never shaved off in mourning for any one but a father. The lower castes of
Muhammadans, if they have lost several children, will allow the scalp-lock
to grow on the heads of those subsequently born, dedicating it to one of their
Muhammadan saints. The Kanjars relate of their heroic ancestor Māna that
after he had plunged a bow so deeply into the ground that no one could
withdraw it, he was set by the Emperor of Delhi to wrestle against the two
most famous Imperial wrestlers. These could not overcome him fairly, so
they made a stratagem, and while one provoked him in front the other
secretly took hold of his choti behind. When Māna started forward his choti
was thus left in the wrestler’s hands, and though he conquered the other
wrestler, showing him the sky as it is said, the loss of his choti deprived him
for ever after of his virtue as a Hindu and in no small degree of his renown
as an ancestor.19 Thus it seems clear that a special virtue attaches to the
choti. Before every warlike expedition the people of Minahassa in Celebes
used to take the locks of hair of a slain foe and dabble them in boiling water
to extract the courage; this infusion of bravery was then drunk by the
warriors.20 In a modern Greek folk-tale a man’s strength lies in three golden
hairs on his head. When his mother plucks them out, he grows weak and

Page 345

timid and is slain by his enemies.21 The Red Indian custom of taking the
scalp, of a slain enemy and sometimes wearing the scalps at the waist-belt
may be due to the same relief.

Hindu men showing the choti or scalp-lock

In Ceram the hair might not be cut because it was the seat of a man’s
strength; and the Gaboon negroes for the same reason would not allow any
of their hair to pass into the possession of a stranger.22

10. Hair of kings and priests

If the hair was considered to be the special source of strength and hence
frequently of life, that of the kings and priests, in whose existence the

Page 346

primitive tribe believed its own communal life to be bound up, would
naturally be a matter of peculiar concern. That it was so has been shown in
the Golden Bough. Two hundred years ago the hair and nails of the Mikādo
of Japan could only be cut when he was asleep.23 The hair of the Flamen
Dialis at Rome could be cut only by a freeman and with a bronze knife, and
his hair and nails when cut had to be buried under a lucky tree.24 The
Frankish kings were never allowed to crop their hair; from their childhood
upwards they had to keep it unshorn. The hair of the Aztec priests hung
down to their hams so that the weight of it became very troublesome; for
they might never crop it so long as they lived, or at least till they had been
relieved from their office on the score of old age.25 In the Māle Pahāria tribe
from the time that any one devoted himself to the profession of priest and
augur his hair was allowed to grow like that of a Nazarite; his power of
divination entirely disappeared if he cut it.26 Among the Bawarias of India
the Bhuva or priest of Devi may not cut or shave his hair under penalty of a
fine of Rs. 10. A Parsi priest or Mobed must never be bare-headed and never
shave his head or face.27 Professor Robertson Smith states: “As a diadem is
in its origin nothing more than a fillet to confine hair that is worn long, I
apprehend that in old times the hair of Hebrew princes like that of a Maori
chief, was taboo, and that Absalom’s long locks (2 Sam. xiv. 26) were the
mark of his political pretensions and not of his vanity. When the hair of a
Maori chief was cut, it was collected and buried in a sacred place or hung on
a tree; and it is noteworthy that Absalom’s hair was cut annually at the end
of the year, in the sacred season of pilgrimage, and that it was collected and
weighed.”28

11. The beard

The importance attached by other races to the hair of the head seems among
the Muhammadans to have been concentrated specially in the beard. The
veneration displayed for the beard in this community is well known. The
Prophet ordained that the minimum length of the beard should be the breadth

Page 347

of five fingers. When the beard is turning grey they usually dye it with henna
and sometimes with indigo; it may be thought that a grey beard is a sign of
weakness. The Prophet said, ‘Change the whiteness of your hair, but not
with anything black.’ It is not clear why black was prohibited. It is said that
the first Caliph Abu Bakar was accustomed to dye his beard red with henna,
and hence this practice has been adopted by Muhammadans.29 The custom
of shaving the chin is now being adopted by young Muhammadans, but as
they get older they still let the beard grow. A very favourite Muhammadan
oath is, ‘By the beard of the Prophet’; and in Persia if a man thinks another
is mocking him he says, ‘Do you laugh at my beard?’ Neither Hindus nor
Muhammadans have any objection to becoming bald, as the head is always
covered by the turban in society. But when a man wishes to grow a beard it
is a serious drawback if he is unable to do it; and he will then sometimes
pluck the young wheat-ears and rub the juice over his cheeks and chin so
that he may grow bearded like the wheat. Among the Hindus, Rājpūts and
Marāthas, as well as the Sikhs, commonly wore beards, all of these being
military castes. Both the beard and hair were considered to impart an aspect
of ferocity to the countenance, and when the Rājpūts and Muhammadans
were going into battle they combed the hair and trained the beard to project
sideways from the face. When a Muhammadan wears a beard he must have
hair in the centre of his chin, whereas a Hindu shaves this part. A
Muhammadan must have his moustache short so that it may not touch and
defile food entering the mouth. It is related that a certain Kāzī had a small
head and a very long beard; and he had a dream that a man with a small head
and a long beard must be a fool. When he woke up he thought this was
applicable to himself. As he could not make his head larger he decided to
make his beard smaller, and looked for scissors to cut part of it off. But he
could not find any scissors, and being in a hurry to shorten his beard he
decided to burn away part of it, and set it alight. But the fire consumed the
whole of his beard before he could put it out, and he then realised the truth
of the dream.

Page 348

12. Significance of removal of the hair and shaving the
head

If the hair was considered to be the source of a man’s strength and vigour,
the removal of it would involve the loss of this and might be considered
especially to debar him from fighting or governing. The instances given
from the Golden Bough have shown the fear felt by many people of the
consequences of the removal of their hair. The custom of shaving the head
might also betoken the renunciation of the world and of the pursuit of arms.
This may be the reason why monks shaved the head, a practice which was
followed by Buddhist as well as Christian monks. A very clear case is also
given by Sir James Frazer: “When the wicked brothers Clotaire and
Childebert coveted the kingdom of their dead brother Clodomir, they
inveigled into their power their little nephews, the two sons of Clodomir;
and having done so, they sent a messenger bearing scissors and a naked
sword to the children’s grandmother, Queen Clotilde, at Paris. The envoy
showed the scissors and the sword to Clotilde, and bade her choose whether
the children should be shorn and live, or remain unshorn and die. The proud
queen replied that if her grandchildren were not to come to the throne she
would rather see them dead than shorn. And murdered they were by their
ruthless uncle Clotaire with his own hand.”30 In this case it appears that if
their hair was shorn the children could not come to the throne but would be
destined to become monks. Similarly, in speaking of the Georgians, Marco
Polo remarks that they cut their hair short like churchmen.31 When a
member of the religious order of the Mānbhaos is initiated his head is shaved
clean by the village barber, and the scalp-lock and moustache must be cut off
by his guru or preceptor, this being perhaps the special mark of his
renunciation of the world. The scalp-locks are preserved and made into ropes
which some of them fasten round their loins. Members of the Hindu orders
generally shave their scalp-locks and the head on initiation, probably for the
same reason as the Mānbhaos. But afterwards they often let the whole of
their hair grow long. These men imagine that by the force of their austerities

Page 349

they will obtain divine power, so their religious character appears to be of a
different order from monasticism. Perhaps, therefore, they wear their hair
long in order to increase their spiritual potency. They themselves now say
that they do it in imitation of the god Siva and the ancient ascetics who had
long matted locks. The common Hindu practice of shaving the heads of
widows may thus be interpreted as a symbol of their complete renunciation
of the world and of any idea of remarriage. It was accompanied by numerous
other rules designed to make a widow’s life a continual penance. This
barbarous custom was formerly fairly general, at least among the higher
castes, but is rapidly being abandoned except by one or two of the stricter
sections of Brāhmans. Shaving the head might also be imposed as a
punishment. Thus in the time of the reign of the Emperor Chandraguptra
Maurya in the fourth century B.C. it is stated that ordinary wounding by
mutilation was punished by the corresponding mutilation of the offender, in
addition to the amputation of his hand. The crime of giving false evidence
was visited with mutilation of the extremities; and in certain unspecified
cases, serious offences were punished by the shaving of the offender’s hair, a
penalty regarded as specially infamous.32 The cutting off of some or all of
the hair is at the present time a common punishment for caste offences.
Among the Korkus a man and woman caught in adultery have each a lock of
hair cut off. If a Chamār man and woman are detected in the same offence,
the heads of both are shaved clean of hair. A Dhīmar girl who goes wrong
before marriage has a lock of her hair cut off as a penalty, the same being
done in several other castes.

13. Shaving the head by mourners

The exact significance which is to be attached to the removal by mourners of
their hair after a death is perhaps doubtful. Sir James Frazer shows that the
Australian aborigines are accustomed to let their own blood flow on to the
corpse of a dead kinsman and to place their cut hair on the corpse. He
suggests that in both cases the object is to strengthen the feeble spirit within
the corpse and sustain its life, in order that it may be born again. As a

Page 350

development of such a rite the hair might have become an offering to the
dead, and later still its removal might become a sacrifice and indication of
grief. In this manner the common custom of tearing the hair in token of grief
and mourning for the dead would be accounted for. Whether the Hindu
custom of shaving the heads of mourners was also originally a sacrifice and
offering appears to be uncertain. Professor Robertson Smith considered33
that in this case the hair is shaved off as a means of removing impurity, and
quotes instances from the Bible where lepers and persons defiled by contact
with the dead are purified by shaving the hair.34 As the father of a child is
also shaved after its birth, and the shaving must here apparently be a rite of
purification, it probably has the same significance in the case of mourners; it
is not clear whether any element of sacrifice is also involved. The degree to
which the Hindu mourner parts with his hair varies to some extent with the
nearness of the relationship, and for females or distant relatives they do not
always shave. The mourners are shaved on the last day of the impurity, when
presents are given to the Mahā-Brāhman, and the latter, representing the
dead man, is also shaved with them. When a Hindu is at the point of death,
before he makes the gifts for the good of his soul the head is shaved with the
exception of his choti or scalp-lock, the chin and upper lip. Often the corpse
is also shaved after death.

14. Hair offerings

Another case of the hair offering is that made in fulfilment of a vow or at a
temple. In this case the hair appears to be a gift-offering which is made to
the god as representing the life and strength of the donor; owing to the
importance attached to the hair as the source of life and strength, it was a
very precious sacrifice. Sir James Frazer also suggests that the hair so given
would impart life and strength to the god, of which he stood in need, just as
he needed food to nourish him. Among the Hindus it is a common practice to
take a child to some well-known temple to have its hair cut for the first time,
and to offer the clippings of hair to the deity. If they cannot go to the temple
to have the hair cut they have it cut at home, and either preserve the whole

Page 351

hair or a lock of it, until an opportunity occurs to offer it at the temple. In
some castes a Brāhman is invited at the first cutting of a child’s hair, and he
repeats texts and blesses the child; the first lock of hair is then cut by the
child’s maternal uncle, and its head is shaved by the barber. A child’s hair is
cut in the first, third or fifth year after birth, but not in the second or fourth
year. Among the Muhammadans when a child’s hair is cut for the first time,
or at least on one occasion in its life, the hair should be weighed against
silver or gold and the amount distributed in charity. In these cases also it
would appear that the hair as a valuable part of the child is offered to the god
to obtain his protection for the life of the child. If a woman has no child and
desires one, or if she has had children and lost them, she will vow her next
child’s hair to some god or temple. A small patch known as chench is then
left unshorn on the child’s head until it can be taken to the temple.

15. Keeping hair unshorn during a vow

It was also the custom to keep the hair unshorn during the performance of a
vow. “While his vow lasted a Nazarite might not have his hair cut: ‘All the
days of the vow of his separation there shall no razor come upon his head.’35
The Egyptians on a journey kept their hair uncut till they returned home.36
Among the Chatti tribe of the ancient Germans the young warriors never
clipped their hair or their beard till they had slain an enemy. Six thousand
Saxons once swore that they would not clip their hair nor shave their beards
until they had taken vengeance on their enemies.”37 Similarly, Hindu
religious mendicants keep their hair long while they are journeying on a
pilgrimage, and when they arrive at the temple which is their goal they shave
it all off and offer it to the god. In this case, as the hair is vowed as an
offering, it clearly cannot be cut during the performance of the vow, but must
be preserved intact. When the task to be accomplished for the fulfilment of a
vow is a journey or the slaying of enemies, the retention of the hair is
probably also meant to support and increase the wearer’s strength for the
accomplishment of his purpose.

Page 352

16. Disposal of cut hair and nails

If the hair contained a part of the wearer’s life and strength its disposal
would be a matter of great importance, because, according to primitive
belief, these qualities would remain in it after it had been severed. Hence, if
an enemy obtained it, by destroying the hair or some analogous action he
might injure or destroy the life and strength of the person to whom it
belonged. The Hindus usually wrap up a child’s first hair in a ball of dough
and throw it into a running stream, with the cuttings of his nails. Well-to-do
people also place a rupee in the ball, so that it is now regarded as an offering.
The same course is sometimes followed with the hair and nails cut
ceremoniously at a wedding, and possibly on one or two other occasions,
such as the investiture with the sacred thread; but the belief is decaying, and
ordinarily no care is taken of the shorn hair. In Berār when the Hindus cut a
child’s hair for the first time they sometimes bury it under a water-pot where
the ground is damp, perhaps with the idea that the child’s hair will grow
thickly and plentifully like grass in a damp place. It is a common belief that
if a barren woman gets hold of a child’s first hair and wears it round her
waist the fertility of the child’s mother will be transferred to her. The
Sarwaria Brāhmans shave a child’s hair in its third year. A small silver razor
is made specially for the occasion, costing a rupee and a quarter, and the
barber first touches the child’s hair with this and then shaves it
ceremoniously with his own razor.38 The Halbas think that the severed
clippings of hair are of no use for magic, but if a witch can cut a lock of hair
from a man’s head she can use it to work magic on him. In making an image
of a person with intent to injure or destroy him, it was customary to put a
little of his hair into the image, by which means his life and strength were
conveyed to it. A few years ago a London newspaper mentioned the case of
an Essex man entering a hairdresser’s and requesting the barber to procure
for him a piece of a certain customer’s hair. When asked the reason for this
curious demand, he stated that the customer had injured him and he wished
to ‘work a spell’ against him.39 In the Pārsi Zend-Avesta it is stated that if

Page 353

the clippings of hair or nails are allowed to fall in the ground or ditches, evil
spirits spring up from them and devour grain and clothing in the house. It
was therefore ordained for the Pārsis through their prophet Zarathustra that
the cuttings of hair or nails should be buried in a deep hole ten paces from a
dwelling, twenty paces from fire, and fifty paces from the sacred bundles
called baresmān. Texts should be said over them and the hole filled in. Many
Pārsis still bury their cut hair and nails four inches under ground, and an
extracted tooth is disposed of in the same manner.40 Some Hindus think that
the nail-parings should always be thrown into a frequented place, where they
will be destroyed by the traffic. If they are thrown on to damp earth they will
grow into a plant which will ruin the person from whose body they came. It
is said that about twenty years ago a man in Nāgpur was ruined by the
growth of a piece of finger-nail, which had accidentally dropped into a
flower-pot in his house. Apparently in this case the nail is supposed to
contain a portion of the life and strength of the person to whom it belonged,
and if the nail grows it gradually absorbs more and more of his life and
strength, and he consequently becomes weaker and weaker through being
deprived of it. The Hindu superstition against shaving the head appears to
find a parallel regarding the nails in the old English saying:

Cut no horn
On the Sabbath morn.

Among some Hindus it is said that the toe-nails should not be cut at all until
a child is married, when they are cut ceremoniously by the barber.

17. Superstitions about shaving the hair

Since the removal of the hair is held to involve a certain loss of strength and
power, it should only be effected at certain seasons and not on auspicious
days. A man who has male children should not have his head shaved on
Monday, as this may cause his children to die. On the other hand, a man who

Page 354

has no children will fast on Sunday in the hope of getting them, and
therefore he will neither shave his head nor visit his wife on that day. A
Hindu must not be shaved on Thursday, because this is the day of the planet
Jupiter, which is also known as Guru, and his act would be disrespectful to
his own guru or preceptor. Tuesday is Devi’s day, and a man will not get
shaved on that day; nor on Saturday, because it is Hanumān’s day.41 On
Sundays, Wednesdays and Fridays he may be shaved, but not if the day
happens to be the new moon, full moon, or the Ashtami or Ekadashi, that is
the eighth or eleventh day of the fortnight. He should not shave on the day
that he is going on a journey. If all these rules were strictly observed there
would be very few days on which one could get shaved, but many of them
are necessarily more honoured in the breach. Wednesdays and Fridays are
the best days for shaving, and by shaving on these days a man will see old
age. Debtors are shaved on Wednesdays, as they think that this will help
them to pay off their debts. Some Brāhmans are not shaved during the month
of Shrāwan (July), when the crops are growing, nor during the nine days of
the months of Kunwār (September) and Chait (March), when a fast is
observed and the jawaras42 are sown. After they have been shaved high-
caste Hindus consider themselves impure till they have bathed. They touch
no person or thing in the house, and sometimes have the water thrown on
them by a servant so as to avoid contact with the vessels. They will also
neither eat, drink nor smoke until they have bathed. Sometimes they throw
so much water over the head in order to purify themselves as to catch a bad
cold. In this case, apparently, the impurity accrues from the loss of the hair,
and the man feels that virtue has gone out of him. Women never shave their
hair with a razor, as they think that to do so would make the body so heavy
after death that it could not be carried to the place of cremation. They
carefully pluck out the hair under the armpits and the pubic hair with a pair
of pincers. A girl’s hair may be cut with scissors, but not after she is ten
years old or is married. Sometimes a girl’s hair is not cut at all, but her father
will take a pearl and entwine it into her hair, where it is left until she is
married. It is considered very auspicious to give away a girl in marriage with
hair which has never been cut, and a pearl in it. After marriage she will take
out the pearl and wear it in an ornament.

Page 355

18. Reasons why the hair was considered the source of
strength

The above evidence appears to indicate that the belief of a man’s strength
and vigour being contained in his hair is by no means confined to the legend
of Samson, but is spread all over the world. This has been pointed out by
Professor Robertson Smith,43 Professor Wilken and others. Sir J.G. Frazer
also adduces several instances in the Golden Bough to show that the life or
soul was believed to be contained in the hair. This may well have been the
case, but the hair was also specialised, so to speak, as the seat of bodily
vigour and strength. The same idea appears to have applied in a minor
measure to the nails and teeth. The rules for disposing of the cut hair usually
apply to the parings of nails, and the first teeth are also deposited in a rat’s
hole or on the roof of the house. As suggested by Professor Robertson Smith
it seems likely that the strength and vigour of the body was believed to be
located in the hair, and also to a less extent in the nails and teeth, because
they grew more visibly and quickly than the body and continued to do so
after it had attained to maturity. The hair and nails continue to grow all
through life, and though the teeth do not grow when fully formed, the second
teeth appear when the body is considerably developed and the wisdom teeth
after it is fully developed. The hair grows much more palpably and
vigorously than the nails and teeth, and hence might be considered especially
the source of strength. Other considerations which might confirm the idea
are that men have more hair on their bodies than women, and strongly built
men often have a large quantity of hair. Some of the stronger wild animals
have long hair, as the lion, bear and wild boar; and the horse, often
considered the embodiment of strength, has a long mane. And when anger is
excited the hair sometimes appears to rise, as it were, from the skin. The
nails and teeth were formerly used on occasion as weapons of offence, and
hence might be considered to contain part of the strength and vigour of the
body.

Page 356

Finally, it may be suggested as a possibility that the Roundheads cut their
hair short as a protest against the superstition that a soldier’s hair must be
long, which originated in the idea that strength is located in the hair and may
have still been current in their time. We know that the Puritans strove vainly
against the veneration of the Maypole as the spirit of the new vegetation,44
and against the old nature-rites observed at Christmas, the veneration of fire
as the preserver of life against cold, and the veneration of the evergreen
plants, the fir tree, the holly, and the mistletoe, which retained their foliage
through the long night of the northern winter, and were thus a pledge to man
of the return of warmth and the renewal of vegetation in the spring. And it
therefore seems not altogether improbable that the Puritans may have
similarly contended against the superstition as to the wearing of long hair.

1 This article is compiled from papers by Mr. Chatterji, retired E.A.C., Jubbulpore; Professor
Sadāshiva Jairām, M.A., Hislop College, Nagpur; and Mr. C. Shrinivas Naidu, First Assistant
Master, Sironcha, Chānda; and from the Central Provinces District Gazetteers.
2 Mr. Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, art. Nai.

3 Tribes and Castes, art. Nai, para. 5.
4 The following account is largely taken from Mr. Nesfield’s Brief View of the Caste System, pp.
42, 43.

5 Eighteenth Century Middle-Class Life, by C.S. Torres, in the Nineteenth Century and After, Sept.
1910.
6 Private Life of an Eastern King, p. 17.

7 Ibidem, p. 107.
8 Private Life of an Eastern King, p. 330.

9 In the Bālāghāt District Gazetteer.
10 D.B. Pandiān, Indian Village Life, under Barber.

11 Quoted in Malcolm’s Sketch of the Sikhs, Asiatic Researches, vol. xi., 1810, p. 289.
12 Quoted in Sir D. Ibbetson’s account of the Sikhs in Punjab Census Report (1881).

13 Sketch of the Sikhs, ibidem, pp. 284, 285.
14 Professor Blümners, Home Life of the Ancient Greeks, translation, p. 455.

Page 357

15 Golden Bough, 2nd ed. vol. iii. p. 370.

16 Hendley, Account of the Bhīls, J.A.S.B. vol. xxxiv., 1875, p. 360.
17 Bombay Gazetteer, Hindus of Gujarāt, p. 528.

18 S.C. Roy, The Mundas and their Country, p. 369.
19 W. Kirkpatrick in J.A.S.B., July 1911, p. 438.

20 Golden Bough, 3rd ed. vol. viii. p. 153.
21 G.B., 3rd ed., Balder the Beautiful, vol. ii. p. 103.

22 Dr. Jevons, Introduction to the History of Religion, p. 45.
23 Golden Bough, 2nd ed. vol. i. p. 234.

24 Ibidem, vol. i. p. 242.
25 Ibidem, vol. i. pp. 368, 369.

26 Dalton, Ethnology of Bengal, p. 270.
27 Bombay Gazetteer, Parsis of Gujarāt, p. 226.

28 Religion of the Semites, note i. pp. 483, 484.
29 Bombay Gazetteer, Muhammadans of Gujarāt, p. 52.

30 Golden Bough, 2nd ed. vol. i. p. 368.
31 Yule’s ed. i. 50, quoted in Bombay Gazetteer, Hindus of Gujarāt, p. 470.

32 Mr. V.A. Smith, Early History of India, 2nd ed. p. 128.
33 Religion of the Semites, p. 33.

34 Lev. xiv. 9 and Deut. xxi. 12.
35 Golden Bough, 2nd ed. vol. i. p. 371.

36 Ibidem, 2nd ed. vol. i. p. 370.
37 Ibidem, 2nd ed. vol. i. p. 371.

38 Mr. Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, art. Sarwaria.
39 Occult Review, October 1909.

40 Orpheus, p. 99, and Bombay Gazetteer, Pārsis of Gujarāt; p. 220.
41 Hanumān is worshipped on this day in order to counteract the evil influence of the planet Saturn,
whose day it really is.

Page 358

42 Pots in which wheat-stalks are sown and tended for nine days, corresponding to the Gardens of
Adonis.

43 Religion of the Semites p. 324.
44 Golden Bough, 2nd ed. vol. i. p. 203.

Page 359

Page 360

Naoda
Naoda.1—A small caste found in the Nimār District and in Central India.
The name means a rower and is derived from nao, a boat. The caste are
closely connected with the Mallāhs or Kewats, but have a slightly distinctive
position, as they are employed to row pilgrims over the Nerbudda at the
great fair held at Siva’s temple on the island of Mandhāta. They say that
their ancestors were Rājpūts, and some of their family names, as Solanki,
Rāwat and Mori, are derived from those of Rājpūt septs. But these have
probably been adopted in imitation of their Kshatriya overlords. The caste is
an occupational one. They have a tradition that in former times a Naoda
boatman recovered the corpse of a king’s daughter, who had drowned herself
in the river wearing costly jewels, and the king as a reward granted them the
right of ferrying pilgrims at Mandhāta, which they still continue to enjoy,
keeping their earnings for themselves. They have a division of impure blood
called the Gāte or bastard Naodas, who marry among themselves, and any
girl who reaches the age of puberty without being married is relegated to
this. In the case of a caste whose numbers are so small, irregular connections
with outsiders must probably be not infrequent. Another report states that
adult unmarried girls are not expelled but are married to a pīpal tree. But
girls are sought after, and it is customary to pay a bride-price, the average
amount of which is Rs. 25. Before the bridegroom starts for his wedding his
mother takes and passes in front of him, successively from his head to his
feet, a pestle, some stalks of rūsa grass, a churning rod and a winnowing-
fan. This is done with the object of keeping off evil spirits, and it is said that
by her action she threatens to pound the spirits with the pestle, to tie them up
with the grass, to churn and mash them with the churning-rod, and to scatter
them to the winds with the winnowing-fan. When a man wishes to divorce
his wife he simply turns her out of the house in the presence of four or five
respectable men of the caste. The marriage of a widow is celebrated on a
Sunday or Tuesday, the clothes of the couple being tied together by another
widow at night. The following day they spend together in a garden, and in
the evening are escorted home by their relatives with torches and music.

Page 361

Next morning the woman goes to the well and draws water, and her husband,
accompanying her, helps her to lift the water-pots on to her shoulder.

The caste worship the ordinary Hindu deities and especially Bhairon, the
guardian of the gate of Mahādeo’s temple. They have a nail driven into the
bow of their boat which is called ‘Bhairon’s nail,’ and at the Dasahra festival
they offer to this a white pumpkin with cocoanuts, vermilion, incense and
liquor. The caste hold in special reverence the cow, the dog and the tamarind
tree. The dog is sacred as being the animal on which Bhairava rides, and
their most solemn oaths are sworn by a dog or a cow. They will on no
account cut or burn the tamarind tree, and the women veil their faces before
it. They cannot explain this sentiment, which is probably due to some
forgotten belief of the nature of totemism. To kill a cow or a cat intentionally
involves permanent exclusion from the caste, while the slaughter of a
squirrel, dog, horse, buffalo or monkey is punished by temporary exclusion,
it being equally sinful to allow any of these animals to die with a rope round
its neck. The Naodas eat the flesh of pigs and fowls, but they occupy a fairly
good social position and Brāhmans will take water from their hands.

1 In 1911 the Naodas numbered 700 persons in the Central Provinces. About 1000 were returned in
Central India in 1891, but in 1901 they were amalgamated with the Mallāhs or Kewats. This
article is based on a paper by Mr. P.R. Kaipitia, Forest Ranger.

Page 362

Nat
List of Paragraphs

1. The Nats not a proper caste
2. Muhammadan Nats
3. Social customs of the Nats. Their low status
4. Acrobatic performances
5. Sliding or walking on ropes as a charm for the crops
6. Snake-charmers

1. The Nats not a proper caste

Nat,1 Bādi, Dang-Charha, Karnati, Bāzigar, Sapera.—The term Nat
(Sanskrit Nata—a dancer) appears to be applied indefinitely to a number of
groups of vagrant acrobats and showmen, especially those who make it their
business to do feats on the tight-rope or with poles, and those who train and
exhibit snakes. Bādi and Bāzigar mean a rope-walker, Dang-Charha a rope-
climber, and Sapera a snake-charmer. In the Central Provinces the Garūdis or
snake-charmers, and the Kolhātis, a class of gipsy acrobats akin to the
Berias, are also known as Nat, and these are treated in separate articles. It is
almost certain that a considerable section, if not the majority, of the Nats
really belong to the Kanjar or Beria gipsy castes, who themselves maybe
sprung from the Doms.2 Sir D. Ibbetson says: “They wander about with their
families, settling for a few days or weeks at a time in the vicinity of large
villages or towns, and constructing temporary shelters of grass. In addition
to practising acrobatic feats and conjuring of a low class, they make articles
of grass, straw and reeds for sale; and in the centre of the Punjab are said to
act as Mirāsis, though this is perhaps doubtful. They often practise surgery

Page 363

and physic in a small way and are not free from suspicion of sorcery.”3 This
account would just as well apply to the Kanjar gipsies, and the Nat women
sometimes do tattooing like Kanjar or Beria women. In Jubbulpore also the
caste is known as Nat Beria, indicating that the Nats there are probably
derived from the Beria caste. Similarly Sir H. Risley gives Bāzigar and
Kabūtari as groups of the Berias of Bengal, and states that these are closely
akin to the Nats and Kanjars of Hindustān.4 An old account of the Nats or
Bāzigars5 would equally well apply to the Kanjars; and in Mr. Crooke’s
detailed article on the Nats several connecting links are noticed. The Nat
women are sometimes known as Kabūtari or pigeon, either because their
acrobatic feats are like the flight of the tumbler pigeon, or on account of the
flirting manner with which they attract their male customers.6 In the Central
Provinces the women of the small Gopāl caste of acrobats are called
Kabūtari, and this further supports the hypothesis that Nat is rather an
occupational term than the name of a distinct caste, though it is quite likely
that there may be Nats who have no other caste. The Bādi or rope-dancer
group again is an offshoot of the Gond tribe, at least in the tracts adjoining
the Central Provinces. They have Gond septs as Marai, Netām, Wīka,7 and
they have the damru or drum used by the Gaurias or snake-charmers and
jugglers of Chhattīsgarh, who are also derived from the Gonds. The
Chhattīsgarhi Dang-Charhas are Gonds who say they formerly belonged to
Panna State and were supported by Rāja Amān Singh of Panna, a great
patron of their art. They sing a song lamenting his death in the flower of his
youth. The Karnatis or Karnataks are a class of Nats who are supposed to
have come from the Carnatic. Mr. Crooke notes that they will eat the
leavings of all high castes, and are hence known as Khushhāliya or ‘Those in
prosperous circumstances.’8

2. Muhammadan Nats

One division of the Nats are Muhammadans and seem to be to some extent a
distinctive group. They have seven gotras—Chicharia, Damaria, Dhalbalki,

Page 364

Pūrbia, Dhondabalki, Karimki and Kalasia. They worship two Birs or spirits,
Halaila Bir and Sheikh Saddu, to whom they sacrifice fowls in the months of
Bhādon (August) and Baisākh (April). Hindus of any caste are freely
admitted into their community, and they can marry Hindu girls.

3. Social customs of the Nats. Their low status

Generally the customs of the Nats show them to be the dregs of the
population. There is no offence which entails permanent expulsion from
caste. They will eat any kind of food including snakes, crocodiles and rats,
and also take food from the hands of any caste, even it is said from
sweepers. It is not reported that they prostitute their women, but there is little
doubt that this is the case; in the Punjab9 when a Nat woman marries, the
first child is either given to the grandmother as compensation for the loss of
the mother’s gains as a prostitute, or is redeemed by a payment of Rs. 30.
Among the Chhattīsgarhi Dang-Charhas a bride-price of Rs. 40 is paid, of
which the girl’s father only keeps ten, and the remaining sum of Rs. 30 is
expended on a feast to the caste. Some of the Nats have taken to cultivation
and become much more respectable, eschewing the flesh of unclean animals.
Another group of the caste keep trained dogs and hunt the wild pig with
spears like the Kolhātis of Berār. The villagers readily pay for their services
in order to get the pig destroyed, and they sell the flesh to the Gonds and
lower castes of Hindus. Others hunt jackals with dogs in the same manner.
They eat the flesh of the jackals and dispose of any surplus to the Gonds,
who also eat it. The Nats worship Devi and also Hanumān, the monkey god,
on account of the acrobatic powers of monkeys. But in Bombay they say that
their favourite and only living gods are their bread-winners and averters of
hunger, the drum, the rope and the balancing-pole.10

Page 365

4. Acrobatic performances

The tight-rope is stretched between two pairs of bamboos, each pair being
fixed obliquely in the ground and crossing each other at the top so as to form
a socket over which the rope passes. The ends of the rope are taken over the
crossed bamboos and firmly secured to the ground by heavy pegs. The
performer takes another balancing-pole in his hands and walks along the
rope between the poles which are about 12 feet high. Another man beats a
drum, and a third stands under the rope singing the performer’s praises and
giving him encouragement. After this the performer ties two sets of cow or
buffalo horns to his feet, which are secured to the back of the skulls so that
the flat front between the horns rests on the rope, and with these he walks
over the rope, holding the balancing-rod in his hands and descends again.
Finally he takes a brass plate and a cloth and again ascends the rope. He
places the plate on the rope and folds the cloth over it to make a pad. He then
stands on his head on the pad with his feet in the air and holds the balancing-
rod in his hands; two strings are tied to the end of this rod and the other ends
of the strings are held by the man underneath. With the assistance of the
balancing-rod the performer then jerks the plate along the rope with his
head, his feet being in the air, until he arrives at the end and finally descends
again. This usually concludes the performance, which demands a high
degree of skill. Women occasionally, though rarely, do the same feats.
Another class of Nats walk on high stilts and the women show their
confidence by dancing and singing under them. A saying about the Nats is:
Nat ka bachcha to kalābazi hi karega; or ‘The rope-dancer’s son is always
turning somersaults.’11

5. Sliding or walking on ropes as a charm for the crops

Page 366

The feats of the Nats as tight-rope walkers used apparently to make a
considerable impression on the minds of the people, as it is not uncommon
to find a deified Nat, called Nat Bāba or Father Nat, as a village god. A Natni
or Nat woman is also sometimes worshipped, and where two sharp peaks of
hills are situated close to each other, it is related that in former times there
was a Natni, very skilful on the tight-rope, who performed before the king;
and he promised her that if she would stretch a rope from the peak of one hill
to that of the other and walk across it he would marry her and make her
wealthy. Accordingly the rope was stretched, but the queen from jealousy
went and cut it half through in the night, and when the Natni started to walk
the rope broke and she fell down and was killed. She was therefore deified
and worshipped. It is probable that this legend recalls some rite in which the
Nat was employed to walk on a tight-rope for the benefit of the crops, and, if
he failed, was killed as a sacrifice; for the following passage taken from
Traill’s account of Kumaon12 seems clearly to refer to some such rite:

“Drought, want of fertility in the soil, murrain in cattle, and other calamities
incident to husbandry are here invariably ascribed to the wrath of particular
gods, to appease which recourse is had to various ceremonies. In the
Kumaon District offerings and singing and dancing are resorted to on such
occasions. In Garhwāl the measures pursued with the same view are of a
peculiar nature, deserving of more particular notice. In villages dedicated to
the protection of Mahādeva propitiatory festivals are held in his honour. At
these Bādis or rope-dancers are engaged to perform on the tight-rope, and
slide down an inclined rope stretched from the summit of a cliff to the valley
beneath and made fast to posts driven into the ground. The Bādi sits astride
on a wooden saddle, to which he is tied by thongs; the saddle is similarly
secured to the bast or sliding cable, along which it runs, by means of a deep
groove; sandbags are tied to the Bādi’s feet sufficient to secure his balance,
and he is then, after various ceremonies and the sacrifice of a kid, started off;
the velocity of his descent is very great, and the saddle, however well
greased, emits a volume of smoke throughout the greater part of his
progress. The length and inclination of the bast necessarily vary with the
nature of the cliff, but as the Bādi is remunerated at the rate of a rupee for
every hundred cubits, hence termed a tola, a correct measurement always
takes place; the longest bast which has fallen within my observation has

Page 367

been twenty-one tolas, or 2100 cubits in length. From the precautions taken
as above mentioned the only danger to be apprehended by the Bādi is from
breaking of the rope, to provide against which the latter, commonly from one
and a half to two inches in diameter, is made wholly by his own hand; the
material used is the bhābar grass. Formerly, if a Bādi fell to the ground in
his course, he was immediately despatched with a sword by the surrounding
spectators, but this practice is now, of course, prohibited. No fatal accident
has occurred from the performance of this ceremony since 1815, though it is
probably celebrated at not less than fifty villages in each year. After the
completion of the sliding, the bast or rope is cut up and distributed among
the inhabitants of the village, who hang the pieces as charms on the eaves of
their houses. The hair of the Bādi is also taken and preserved as possessing
similar virtues. He being thus made the organ to obtain fertility for the lands
of others, the Bādi is supposed to entail sterility on his own; and it is firmly
believed that no grain sown with his hand can ever vegetate. Each District
has its hereditary Bādi, who is supported by annual contributions of grain
from the inhabitants.” It is not improbable that the performance of the Nat is
a reminiscence of a period when human victims were sacrificed for the
crops, this being a common practice among primitive peoples, as shown by
Sir J.G. Frazer in Attis, Adonis, Osiris. Similarly the spirits of Nats which are
revered in the Central Provinces may really be those of victims killed during
the performance of some charm for the good of the crops, akin to that still
prevalent in the Himalayas. The custom of making the Nat slide down a rope
is of the same character as that of swinging a man in the air by a hook
secured in his flesh, which was formerly common in these Provinces. But in
both cases the meaning of the rite is obscure.

6. Snake-charmers

The groups who practise snake-charming are known as Sapera or Garūdi and
in the Marātha Districts as Madāri. Another name for them is Nāg-Nathi, or
one who seizes a cobra. They keep cobras, pythons, scorpions, and the
iguana or large lizard, which they consider to be poisonous. Some of them

Page 368

when engaged with their snakes wear two pieces of tiger-skin on their back
and chest, and a cap of tiger-skin in which they fix the eyes of various birds.
They have a hollow gourd on which they produce a kind of music and this is
supposed to charm the snakes. When catching a cobra they pin its head to
the ground with a stick and then seize it in a cleft bamboo and prick out the
poison-fangs with a large needle. They think that the teeth of the iguana are
also poisonous and they knock them out with a stick, and if fresh teeth
afterwards grow they believe them not to contain poison. The python is
called Ajgar, which is said to mean eater of goats. In captivity the pythons
will not eat of themselves, and the snake-charmers chop up pieces of meat
and fowls and placing the food in the reptile’s mouth massage it down the
body. They feed the pythons only once in four or five days. They have
antidotes for snake-bite, the root of a creeper called kalipār and the bark of
the karheya tree. When a patient is brought to them they give him a little
pepper, and if he tastes the pungent flavour they think that he has not been
affected by snake-poison, but if it seems tasteless that he has been bitten.
Then they give him small pieces of the two antidotes already mentioned with
tobacco and 2½ leaves of the nīm tree13 which is sacred to Devi. On the
festival of Nāg-Panchmi (Cobra’s Fifth) they worship their cobras and give
them milk to drink and then take them round the town or village and the
people also worship and feed the snakes and give a present of a few annas to
the Sapera. In towns much frequented by cobras, a special adoration is paid
to them. Thus in Hatta in the Damoh District a stone image of a snake,
known as Nāg-Bāba or Father Cobra is worshipped for a month before the
festival of Nāg-Panchmi. During this period one man from every house in
the village must go to Nāg-Bāba’s shrine outside and take food there and
come back. And on Nāg-Panchmi the whole town goes out in a body to pay
him reverence, and it is thought that if any one is absent the cobras will
harass him for the whole year. But others say that cobras will only bite men
of low caste. The Saperas will not kill a snake as a rule, but occasionally it is
said that they kill one and cut off the head and eat the body, this being
possibly an instance of eating the divine animal at a sacrificial meal. The
following is an old account of the performances of snake-charmers in
Bengal:14

Page 369

Snake-charmer with cobras

“Hence, on many occasions throughout the year, the dread Manasa Devi, the
queen of snakes, is propitiated by presents, vows and religious rites. In the
month of Shrābana the worship of the snake goddess is celebrated with great
éclat. An image of the goddess, seated on a water-lily, encircled with

Page 370

serpents, or a branch of the snake-tree (a species of Euphorbia), or a pot of
water, with images of serpents made of clay, forms the object of worship.
Men, women and children, all offer presents to avert from themselves the
wrath of the terrific deity. The Māls or snake-catchers signalise themselves
on this occasion. Temporary scaffolds of bamboo work are set up in the
presence of the goddess. Vessels filled with all sorts of snakes are brought in.
The Māls, often reeling with intoxication, mount the scaffolds, take out
serpents from the vessels, and allow them to bite their arms. Bite after bite
succeeds; the arms run with blood; and the Māls go on with their pranks,
amid the deafening plaudits of the spectators. Now and then they fall off
from the scaffold and pretend to feel the effects of poison, and cure
themselves by their incantations. But all is mere pretence. The serpents
displayed on the occasion and challenged to do their worst, have passed
through a preparatory state. Their fangs have been carefully extracted from
their jaws. But most of the vulgar spectators easily persuade themselves to
believe that the Māls are the chosen servants of Siva and the favourites of
Manasa. Although their supernatural pretensions are ridiculous, yet it must
be confessed that the Māls have made snakes the subject of their peculiar
study. They are thoroughly acquainted with their qualities, their dispositions,
and their habits. They will run down a snake into its hole, and bring it out
thence by main force. Even the terrible cobra is cowed down by the
controlling influence of a Māl. When in the act of bringing out snakes from
their subterranean holes, the Māls are in the habit of muttering charms, in
which the names of Manasa and Mahādeva frequently occur; superstition
alone can clothe these unmeaning words with supernatural potency. But it is
not inconsistent with the soundest philosophy to suppose that there may be
some plants whose roots are disagreeable to serpents, and from which they
instinctively turn away. All snake-catchers of Bengal are provided with a
bundle of the roots of some plant which they carefully carry along with
them, when they set out on their serpent-hunting expeditions. When a
serpent, disturbed in its hole, comes out furiously hissing with rage, with its
body coiled, and its head lifted up, the Māl has only to present before it the
bundle of roots above alluded to, at the sight of which it becomes spiritless
as an eel. This we have ourselves witnessed more than once.”

Page 371

These Māls appear to have been members of the aboriginal Māle or Māle
Pahāria tribe of Bengal.

1 This article is partly compiled from notes furnished by Mr. Adurām Chaudhri and Mr. Jagannāth
Prasad, Naib-Tahsīldārs.

2 See art. Kanjar.
3 Punjab Census Report (1881), para. 588.

4 Tribes and Castes of Bengal, art. Beria.
5 Asiatic Researches, vol. vii., 1803, by Captain Richardson.

6 Tribes and Castes, art. Nat.
7 Crooke, l.c., art. Nat.
8 Ibidem.
9 Ibbetson, Punjab Census Report (1886), para. 588.

10 Bombay Gazetteer, vol. xx. p. 186, quoted in Mr. Crooke’s article.
11 Temple and Fallon’s Hindustāni Proverbs, p. 171.

12 As. Res. vol. xvi., 1828, p. 213.
13 Melia indica.

14 Bengali Festivals and Holidays, by the Rev. Bihāri Lāl De, Calcutta Review, vol. v. pp. 59, 60.

Page 372

Nunia
Nunia, Lunia.1—A mixed occupational caste of salt-makers and earth-
workers, made up of recruits from the different non-Aryan tribes of northern
India. The word non means salt, and is a corruption of the Sanskrit lavana,
‘the moist,’ which first occurs as a name for sea-salt in the Atharva Veda.2 In
the oldest prose writings salt is known as Saindhava or ‘that which is
brought from the Indus,’ this perhaps being Punjab rock-salt. The Nunias are
a fairly large caste in Bengal and northern India, numbering 800,000
persons, but the Central Provinces and Berār contain only 3000, who are
immigrants from Upper India. Here they are navvies and masons, a calling
which they have generally adopted since the Government monopoly has
interfered with their proper business of salt-refining. The mixed origin of the
caste is shown by the list of their subdivisions in the United Provinces,
which includes the names Mallāh, Kewat, Kūchbandhia, Bind, Musahār,
Bhuinhār and Lodha, all of which are distinct castes, besides a number of
territorial subcastes. A list of nearly thirty subcastes is given by Mr. Crooke,
and this is an instance of the tendency of migratory castes to split up into
small groups for the purpose of arranging marriages, owing to the difficulty
of ascertaining the status and respectability of each other’s families, and the
unwillingness to contract alliances with those whose social position may turn
out to be not wholly satisfactory. “The internal structure of the caste,” Mr.
Crooke remarks, “is far from clear; it would appear that they are still in a
state of transition, and the different endogamous subcastes are not as yet
fully recognised.” In Bilāspur the Nunias have three local subcastes, the
Bandhaiya, the Ratanpuria and the Kharodhia. The two last, deriving their
names from the towns of Ratanpur and Kharod in Bilāspur, are said to have
been employed in former times in the construction of the temples and other
buildings which abound in these localities, and have thus acquired a
considerable degree of professional skill in masonry work; while the
Bandhaiya, who take their name from Bāndhogarh, confine themselves to
the excavation of tanks and wells. The exogamous divisions of the caste are
also by no means clearly defined; in Mīrzāpur they have a system of local

Page 373

subdivisions called dīh, each subdivision being named after the village
which is supposed to be its home. The word dīh itself means a site or village.
Those who have a common dīh do not intermarry.3 This fact is interesting as
being an instance of the direct derivation of the exogamous clan from
residence in a parent village and not from any heroic or supposititious
ancestor.

The caste have a legend which shows their mixed origin. Some centuries
ago, they say, a marriage procession consisting of Brāhmans, Rājpūts,
Banias and Gosains went to a place near Ajodhya. After the ceremony was
over the bride, on being taken to the bridegroom’s lodging, scraped up a
little earth with her fingers and put it in her mouth. She found it had a saltish
taste, and spat it out on the ground, and this enraged the tutelary goddess of
the village, who considered herself insulted, and swore that all the bride’s
descendants should excavate salt in atonement; and thus the caste arose.

In Bilāspur the caste permit a girl to be married to a boy younger than
herself. A price of five rupees has to be paid for the bride, unless her family
give a girl in exchange. The bridegroom is taken to the wedding in a
palanquin borne by Mahārs. After its conclusion the couple are carried back
in the litter for some distance, after which the bridegroom gets out and walks
or rides. When he goes to fetch his wife on her coming of age the
bridegroom wears white clothes, which is rather peculiar, as white is not a
lucky colour among the Hindus. The Nunias employ Brāhmans at their
ceremonies, and they have a caste panchāyat or committee, whose headman
is known as Kurha. The Bilāspur section of the caste has two Kurhas. Here
Brāhmans take water from them, but not in all places. They consider their
traditional occupation to have been the extraction of salt and saltpetre from
saline earth. At present they are generally employed in the excavation of
tanks and the embankment of fields, and they also sink wells, build and erect
houses, and undertake all kinds of agricultural labour.

1 Based on papers by Munshi Kanhya Lāl of the Gazetteer Office, and Mr. Mīr Patcha, Tahsīldār,
Bilāspur.
2 Mr. Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, art. Lunia.

Page 374

3 Mr. Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, art. Lunia.

Page 375

Ojha
Ojha.—The community of soothsayers and minstrels of the Gonds. The
Ojhas may now be considered a distinct subtribe, as they are looked down
upon by the Gonds and marry among themselves. They derive their name
from the word ojh meaning ‘entrail,’ their original duty having been, like
that of the Roman augurs, to examine the entrails of the victim immediately
after it had been slain as an offering to the gods. In 1911 the Ojhas numbered
about 5000 persons distributed over all Districts of the Central Provinces. At
present the bulk of the community subsist by beggary. The word Ojha is of
Sanskrit and not of Gond origin and is applied by the Hindus to the seers or
magicians of several of the primitive tribes, while there is also a class of
Ojha Brāhmans who practise magic and divination. The Gond Ojhas, who
are the subject of this article, originally served the Gonds and begged from
them alone, but in some parts of the western Satpūras they are also the
minstrels of the Korkus. Those who beg from the Korkus play on a kind of
drum called dhānk while the Gond Ojhas use the kingri or lyre. Some of
them also catch birds and are therefore known as Moghia. Mr. Hislop1
remarks of them: “The Ojhas follow the two occupations of bard and fowler.
They lead a wandering life and when passing through villages they sing from
house to house the praises of their heroes, dancing with castanets in their
hands, bells at their ankles and long feathers of jungle birds in their turbans.
They sell live quails and the skins of a species of Buceros named Dhan-
chīria; these are used for making caps and for hanging up in houses in order
to secure wealth (dhan), while the thigh-bones of the same bird when
fastened round the waists of children are deemed an infallible preservative
against the assaults of devils and other such calamities. Their wives tattoo
the arms of Hindu and Gond women. Among them there is a subdivision
known as the Māna Ojhas, who rank higher than the others. Laying claim to
unusual sanctity, they refuse to eat with any one, Gonds, Rājpūts or even
Brāhmans, and devote themselves to the manufacture of rings and bells
which are in request among their own race, and even of lingas (phallic
emblems) and nandis (bull images), which they sell to all ranks of the Hindu

Page 376

community. Their wives are distinguished by wearing the cloth of the upper
part of the body over the right shoulder, whereas those of the common Ojhas
and of all the other Gonds wear it over the left.”

Mr. Tawney wrote of the Ojhas as follows:2 “The Ojha women do not dance.
It is only men who do so, and when thus engaged they put on special attire
and wear anklets with bells. The Ojhas like the Gonds are divided into six or
seven god gots (classes or septs), and those with the same number of gods
cannot intermarry. They worship at the same Deokhala (god’s threshing-
floor) as the Gonds, but being regarded as an inferior caste they are not
allowed so near the sacred presence. Like the Gonds they incorporate the
spirits of the dead with the gods, but their manner of doing so is somewhat
different, as they make an image of brass to represent the soul of the
deceased and keep this with the household gods. As with the Gonds, if a
household god makes himself too objectionable he is quietly buried to keep
him out of mischief and a new god is introduced into the family. The latter
should properly bear the same name as his degraded predecessor, but very
often does not. The Ojhas are too poor to indulge in the luxury of burning
their deceased friends and therefore invariably bury them.”

The customs of the Ojhas resemble those of the Gonds. They take the bride
to the bridegroom’s house to be married, and a widow among them is
expected, though not obliged, to wed her late husband’s younger brother.
They eat the flesh of fowls, pigs, and even oxen, but abstain from that of
monkeys, crocodiles and jackals. They will not touch an ass, a cat or a dog,
and consider it sinful to kill animals which bark or bray.

They will take food from the hands of all except the most impure castes, and
will admit into the community any man who has taken an Ojha woman to
live with him, even though he be a sweeper, provided that he will submit to
the prescribed test of begging from the houses of five Gonds and eating the
leavings of food of the other Ojhas. They will pardon the transgression of
one of their women with an outsider of any caste whatever, if she is able and
willing to provide the usual penalty feast. They have no sūtak or period of
impurity after a death, but merely take a mouthful of liquor and consider
themselves clean. In physical appearance the Ojhas resemble the Gonds but

Page 377

are less robust. They rank below the Gonds and are considered as impure by
the Hindu castes. In 1865, an Ojha held a village in Hoshangābād District
which he had obtained as follows:3 “He was singing and dancing before Rāja
Rāghuji, when the Rāja said he would give a rent-free village to any one
who would pick up and chew a quid of betel-leaf which he (the Rāja) had
had in his mouth and had spat out. The Ojha did this and got the village.”

The Maithil or Tirhūt Brāhmans who are especially learned in Tāntric magic
are also sometimes known as Ojha, and a family bearing this title were
formerly in the service of the Gond kings of Mandla. They do not now admit
that they acted as augurs or soothsayers, but state that their business was to
pray continuously for the king’s success when he was engaged in any battle,
and to sit outside the rooms of sick persons repeating the sacred Gāyatri
verse for their recovery. This is often repeated ten times, counting by a
special method on the joints of the fingers and is then known as Jap. When it
is repeated a larger number of times, as 54 or 108, a rosary is used.

1 Papers relating to the Aboriginal Tribes of the C.P., p. 6.
2 Note by Mr. Tawney as Deputy Commissioner of Chhindwāra, quoted in Central Provinces
Census Report of 1881 (Mr. Drysdale).

3 Sir C.A. Elliott’s Hoshangābād Settlement Report, p. 70.

Page 378

Oraon
[Authorities: The most complete account of the Oraons is a monograph
entitled, The Religion and Customs of the Oraons, by the late Rev. Father P.
Dehon, published in 1906 in the Memoirs of the Asiatic Society of Bengal,
vol. i. No. 9. The tribe is also described at length by Colonel Dalton in The
Ethnography of Bengal, and an article on it is included in Mr. (Sir H.)
Risley’s Tribes and Castes of Bengal. References to the Oraons are
contained in Mr. Bradley-Birt’s Chota Nāgpur, and Mr. Ball’s Jungle Life in
India. The Kurukh language is treated by Dr. Grierson in the volume of the
Linguistic Survey on Munda and Dravidian Languages. The following
article is principally made up of extracts from the accounts of Father Dehon
and Colonel Dalton. Papers have also been received from Mr. Hīra Lāl, Mr.
Balārām Nand, Deputy Inspector of Schools, Sambalpur, Mr. Jeorākhan Lāl,
Deputy Inspector of Schools, Bilāspur, and Munshi Kanhya Lāl of the
Gazetteer Office.]

List of Paragraphs

1. General notice
2. Settlement in Chota Nāgpur
3. Subdivisions
4. Pre-nuptial licence
5. Betrothal
6. Marriage ceremony
7. Special Customs
8. Widow-remarriage and divorce
9. Customs at birth
10. Naming a child
11. Branding and tattooing
12. Dormitory discipline
13. Disposal of the dead
14. Worship of ancestors

Page 379

15. Religion. The supreme deity
16. Minor godlings
17. Human sacrifice
18. Christianity
19. Festivals. The Karma or May-day
20. The sāl flower festival
21. The harvest festival
22. Fast for the crops
23. Physical appearance and costume of the Oraons
24. Dress of women
25. Dances
26. Social customs
27. Social rules
28. Character
29. Language

1. General notice

Oraon, Uraon, Kurukh, Dhangar, Kūda, Kisān.—The Oraons are an
important Dravidian tribe of the Chota Nāgpur plateau, numbering altogether
about 750,000 persons, of whom 85,000 now belong to the Central
Provinces, being residents of the Jashpur and Sargūja States and the
neighbouring tracts. They are commonly known in the Central Provinces as
Dhāngar or Dhāngar-Oraon. In Chota Nāgpur the word Dhāngar means a
farmservant engaged according to a special customary contract, and it has
come to be applied to the Oraons, who are commonly employed in this
capacity. Kūda means a digger or navvy in Uriya, and enquiries made by Mr.
B.C. Mazumdar and Mr. Hīra Lāl have demonstrated that the 18,000 persons
returned under this designation from Raigarh and Sambalpur in 1901 were
really Oraons. The same remark applies to 33,000 persons returned from
Sambalpur as Kisān or cultivator, these also being members of the tribe. The
name by which the Oraons know themselves is Kurukh or Kurunkh, and the

Page 380

designation of Oraon or Orao has been applied to them by outsiders. The
meaning of both names is obscure. Dr. Halm1 was of opinion that the word
kurukh might be identified with the Kolarian horo, man, and explained the
term Oraon as the totem of one of the septs into which the Kurukhs were
divided. According to him Oraon was a name coined by the Hindus, its base
being orgorān, hawk or cunny bird, used as the name of a totemistic sept. Sir
G. Grierson, however, suggested a connection with the Kaikāri, urūpai, man;
Burgandi urāpo, man; urāng, men. The Kaikāris are a Telugu caste, and as
the Oraons are believed to have come from the south of India, this derivation
sounds plausible. In a similar way Sir. G. Grierson states, Kurukh may be
connected with Tamil kurūgu, an eagle, and be the name of a totemistic clan.
Compare also names, such as Korava, Kurru, a dialect of Tamil, and
Kudāgu. In the Nerbudda valley the farmservant who pours the seed through
the tube of the sowing-plough is known as Oraya; this word is probably
derived from the verb ūrna to pour, and means ‘one who pours.’ Since the
principal characteristic of the Oraons among the Hindus is their universal
employment as farmservants and labourers, it may be suggested that the
name is derived from this term. Of the other names by which they are known
to outsiders Dhāngar means a farmservant, Kūda a digger, and Kisān a
cultivator. The name Oraon and its variant Orao is very close to Oraya,
which, as already seen, means a farmservant. The nasal seems to be often
added or omitted in this part of the country, as Kurukh or Kurunkh.

2. Settlement in Chota Nāgpur

According to their own traditions, Mr. Gait writes,2 “The Kurukh tribe
originally lived in the Carnatic, whence they went up the Nerbudda river and
settled in Bihār on the banks of the Son. Driven out by the Muhammadans,
the tribe split into two divisions, one of which followed the course of the
Ganges and finally settled in the Rājmahāl hills: while the other went up the
Son and occupied the north-western portion of the Chota Nāgpur plateau,
where many of the villages they occupy are still known by Mundāri names.
The latter were the ancestors of the Oraons or Kurukhs, while the former

Page 381

were the progenitors of the Māle or Saonria as they often call themselves.”
Towards Lohardaga the Oraons found themselves among the Mundas or
Kols, who probably retired by degrees and left them in possession of the
country. “The Oraons,” Father Dehon states, “are an exceedingly prolific
tribe and soon become the preponderant element, while the Mundas, being
conservative and averse to living among strangers, emigrate towards another
jungle. The Mundas hate zamīndārs, and whenever they can do so, prefer to
live in a retired corner in full possession of their small holding; and it is not
at all improbable that, as the zamīndārs took possession of the newly-formed
villages, they retired towards the east, while the Oraons, being good beasts
of burden and more accustomed to subjection, remained.” In view of the fine
physique and martial character of the Larka or Fighting Kols or Mundas,
Dalton was sceptical of the theory that they could ever have retired before
the Oraons; but in addition to the fact that many villages in which Oraons
now live have Mundāri names, it may be noted that the headman of an
Oraon village is termed Munda and is considered to be descended from its
founder, while for the Pāhan or priest of the village gods, the Oraons always
employ a Munda if available, and it is one of the Pāhan’s duties to point out
the boundary of the village in cases of dispute; this is a function regularly
assigned to the earliest residents, and seems to be strong evidence that the
Oraons found the Mundas settled in Chota Nāgpur when they arrived there.
It is not necessary to suppose that any conquest or forcible expropriation
took place; and it is probable that, as the country was opened up, the Mundas
by preference retired to the wilder forest tracts, just as in the Central
Provinces the Korkus and Baigas gave way to the Gonds, and the Gonds
themselves relinquished the open country to the Hindus. None of the writers
quoted notice the name Munda as applied to the headman of an Oraon
village, but it can hardly be doubted that it is connected with that of the tribe;
and it would be interesting also to know whether the Pāhan or village priest
takes his name from the Pāns or Gandas. Dalton says that the Pāns are
domesticated as essential constituents of every Ho or Kol village
community, but does not allude to their presence among the Oraons. The
custom in the Central Provinces, by which in Gond villages the village priest
is always known as Baiga, because in some localities members of the Baiga
tribe are commonly employed in the office, suggests the hypothesis of a
similar usage here. In villages first settled by Oraons, the population, Father

Page 382

Dehon states, is divided into three khūnts or branches, named after the
Munda, Pahan and Mahto, the founders of the three branches being held to
have been sons of the first settler. Members of each branch belong therefore
to the same sept or got. Each khūnt has a share of the village lands.

3. Subdivisions

The Oraons have no proper subcastes in the Central Provinces, but the
Kudas and Kisans, having a distinctive name and occupation, sometimes
regard themselves as separate bodies and decline intermarriage with other
Oraons. In Bengal Sir H. Risley gives five divisions, Barga, Dhānka, Kharia,
Khendro and Munda; of these Kharia and Munda are the names of other
tribes, and Dhānka may be a variant for Dhāngar. The names show that as
usual with the tribes of this part of the country the law of endogamy is by no
means strict. The tribe have also a large number of exogamous septs of the
totemistic type, named after plants and animals. Members of any sept
commonly abstain from killing or eating their sept totem. A man must not
marry a member of his own sept nor a first cousin on the mother’s side.

4. Pre-nuptial licence

Marriage is adult and pre-nuptial unchastity appears to be tacitly recognised.
Oraon villages have the institution of the Dhūmkuria or Bachelors’
dormitory, which Dalton describes as follows:3 “In all the older Oraon
villages when there is any conservation of ancient customs, there is a house
called the Dhūmkuria in which all the bachelors of the village must sleep
under penalty of a fine. The huts of the Oraons have insufficient
accommodation for a family, so that separate quarters for the young men are
a necessity. The same remark applies to the young unmarried women, and it

Page 383

is a fact that they do not sleep in the house with their parents. They are
generally frank enough when questioned about their habits, but on this
subject there is always a certain amount of reticence, and I have seen girls
quietly withdraw when it was mooted. I am told that in some villages a
separate building is provided for them like the Dhūmkuria, in which they
consort under the guardianship of an elderly duenna, but I believe the more
common practice is to distribute them among the houses of the widows, and
this is what the girls themselves assert, if they answer at all when the
question is asked; but however billeted, it is well known that they often find
their way to the bachelors’ hall, and in some villages actually sleep there. I
not long ago saw a Dhūmkuria in a Sargūja village in which the boys and
girls all slept every night.” Colonel Dalton considered it uncertain that the
practice led to actual immorality, but the fact can hardly be doubted. Sexual
intercourse before marriage, Sir H. Risley says, is tacitly recognised, and is
so generally practised that in the opinion of the best observers no Oraon girl
is a virgin at the time of her marriage. “To call this state of things immoral is
to apply a modern conception to primitive habits of life. Within the tribe,
indeed, the idea of sexual morality seems hardly to exist, and the unmarried
Oraons are not far removed from the condition of modified promiscuity
which prevails among many of the Australian tribes. Provided that the
exogamous circle defined by the totem is respected, an unmarried woman
may bestow her favours on whom she will. If, however, she becomes
pregnant, arrangements are made to get her married without delay, and she is
then expected to lead a virtuous life.”4 According to Dalton, however,
liaisons between boys and girls of the same village seldom end in marriage,
as it is considered more respectable to bring home a bride from a distance.
This appears to arise from the primitive rule of exogamy that marriage
should not be allowed between those who have been brought up together.
The young men can choose for themselves, and at dances, festivals and other
social gatherings they freely woo their sweethearts, giving them flowers for
the hair and presents of grilled field-mice, which the Oraons consider to be
the most delicate of food. Father Dehon, however, states that matches are
arranged by the parents, and the bride and bridegroom have nothing to say in
the matter. Boys are usually married at sixteen and girls at fourteen or
fifteen. The girls thus have only about two years of preliminary flirtation or
Dhūmkuria life before they are settled.

Page 384

5. Betrothal

The first ceremony for a marriage is known as pān bandhi or the settling of
the price; for which the boy’s father, accompanied by some men of his
village to represent the panch or elders, goes to the girl’s house. Father
Dehon states that the bride-price is five rupees and four maunds of grain.
When this has been settled the rejoicings begin. “All the people of the
village are invited; two boys come and anoint the visitors with oil. From
every house of the village that can afford it a handia or pot of rice-beer is
brought, and they drink together and make merry. All this time the girl has
been kept inside, but now she suddenly sallies forth carrying a handia on her
head. A murmur of admiration greets her when stepping through the crowd
she comes and stands in front of her future father-in-law, who at once takes
the handia from her head, embraces her, and gives her one rupee. From that
time during the whole of the feast the girl remains sitting at the feet of her
father-in-law. The whole party meanwhile continue drinking and talking; and
voices rise so high that they cannot hear one another. As a diversion the old
women of the village all come tumbling in, very drunk and wearing fantastic
hats made of leaves, gesticulating like devils and carrying a straw manikin
representing the bridegroom. They all look like old witches, and in their
drunken state are very mischievous.”

6. Marriage ceremony

The marriage takes place after about two years, visits being exchanged twice
a year in the meantime. When the day comes the bridegroom proceeds with a
large party of his friends, male and female, to the bride’s house. Most of the
males have warlike weapons, real or sham, and as they approach the village

Page 385

of the bride’s family the young men from thence emerge, also armed, as if to
repel the invasion, and a mimic fight ensues, which like a dissolving view
blends pleasantly into a dance. In this the bride and bridegroom join, each
riding on the hips of one of their friends. After this they have a feast till late
in the night. Next morning bread cooked by the bride’s mother is taken to the
dari or village spring, where all the women partake of it. When they have
finished they bring a vessel of water with some leaves of the mango tree in
it. Meanwhile the bride and bridegroom are in the house, being anointed
with oil and turmeric by their respective sisters. When everybody has
gathered under the marriage-bower the boy and girl are brought out of the
house and a heap is made of a plough-yoke, a bundle of thatching-grass and
a curry-stone. The bride and bridegroom are made to stand on the curry-
stone, the boy touching the heels of the bride with his toes, and a long piece
of cloth is put round them to screen them from the public. Only their heads
and feet can be seen. A goblet full of vermilion is presented to the boy, who
dips his finger in it and makes three lines on the forehead of the girl; and the
girl does the same to the boy, but as she has to reach him over her shoulder
and cannot see him, the boy gets it anywhere, on his face, which never fails
to provoke hearty bursts of laughter. “When this is complete,” Dalton states,
“a gun is fired and then by some arrangement vessels full of water, placed
over the bower, are upset, and the young couple and those near them receive
a drenching shower-bath, the women shouting, ‘The marriage is done, the
marriage is done.’ They now retire into an apartment prepared for them,
ostensibly to change their clothes, but they do not emerge for some time, and
when they do appear they are saluted as man and wife.”

7. Special Customs

Meanwhile the guests sit round drinking handias or earthen pots full of rice-
beer. The bride and bridegroom come out and retire a second time and are
called out for the following rite. A vessel of beer is brought and the bride
carries a cupful of it to the bridegroom’s brother, but instead of giving it into
his hand she deposits it on the ground in front of him. This is to seal a kind

Page 386

of tacit agreement that from that time the bridegroom’s brother will not
touch his sister-in-law, and was probably instituted to mark the abolition of
the former system of fraternal polyandry, customs of an analogous nature
being found among the Khonds and Korkus. “Then,” Father Dehon
continues, “comes the last ceremony, which is called khirītengna handia or
the handia of the story, and is considered by the Oraons to be the true form
of marriage which has been handed down to them by their forefathers. The
boy and girl sit together before the people, and one of the elder men present
rises and addressing the boy says: ‘If your wife goes to fetch sāg and falls
from a tree and breaks her leg, do not say that she is disfigured or crippled.
You will have to keep and feed her.’ Then turning to the girl: ‘When your
husband goes hunting, if his arm or leg is broken, do not say, “He is a
cripple, I won’t live with him.” Do not say that, for you have to remain with
him. If you prepare meat, give two shares to him and keep only one for
yourself. If you prepare vegetables, give him two parts and keep only one
part for yourself. If he gets sick and cannot go out, do not say that he is dirty,
but clean his mat and wash him.’ A feast follows, and at night the girl is
brought to the boy by her mother, who says to him, ‘Now this my child is
yours; I do not give her for a few days but for ever; take care of her and love
her well.’ A companion of the bridegroom’s then seizes the girl in his arms
and carries her inside the house.”

8. Widow-remarriage and divorce

It is uncommon for a man to have two wives. Divorce is permitted, and is
usually effected by the boy or girl running away to the Duārs or Assam.
Widow-remarriage is a regular practice. The first time a widow marries
again, Father Dehon states, the bridegroom must pay Rs. 3–8 for her; if
successive husbands die her price goes down by a rupee on each fresh
marriage, so that a fifth husband would pay only eight annas. Cases of
adultery are comparatively rare. When offenders are caught a heavy fine is
imposed if they are well-to-do, and if they are not, a smaller fine and a
beating.

Page 387

9. Customs at birth

“The Oraons,” Father Dehon continues, “are a very prolific race, and
whenever they are allowed to live without being too much oppressed they
increase prodigiously. What strikes you when you come to an Oraon village
is the number of small dirty children playing everywhere, while you can
scarcely meet a woman that does not carry a baby on her back. The women
seem, to a great extent, to have been exempted from the curse of our first
mother: ‘Thou shalt bring forth, etc.’ They seem to give birth to their
children with the greatest ease. There is no period of uncleanness, and the
very day after giving birth to a child, you will see the mother with her baby
tied up in a cloth on her back and a pitcher on her head going, as if nothing
had happened, to the village spring.” This practice, it may be remarked in
parenthesis, may arise from the former observance of the Couvade, the
peculiar custom prevailing among several primitive races, by which, when a
child is born, the father lies in the house and pretends to be ill, while the
mother gets up immediately and goes about her work. The custom has been
reported as existing among the Oraons by one observer from Bilāspur,5 but
so far without confirmation.

10. Naming a child

“A child is named eight or ten days after birth, and on this day some men of
the village and the members of the family assemble at the parents’ house.
Two leaf-cups are brought, one full of water and the other of rice. After a
preliminary formula grains of rice are let fall into the cup, first in the name
of the child and then successively in those of his ancestors in the following
order: paternal grandfather, paternal great-grandfather, father, paternal uncle,

Page 388

maternal grandfather, other relatives. When the grain dropped in the name of
any relative meets the first one dropped to represent the child, he is given the
name of that relative and is probably considered to be a reincarnation of
him.”

11. Branding and tattooing

“When a boy is six or seven years old it is time for him to become a member
of the Dhūmkuria or common dormitory. The eldest boys catch hold of his
left arm and, with burning cloth, burn out five deep marks on the lower part
of his arm. This is done so that he may be recognised as an Oraon at his
death when he goes into the other world.” The ceremony was probably the
initiation to manhood on arrival at puberty, and resembled those prevalent
among the Australian tribes. With this exception men are not tattooed, but
this decoration is profusely resorted to by women. They have three parallel
vertical lines on the forehead which form a distinctive mark, and other
patterns on the arms, chest, knees and ankles. These usually consist of lines
vertical and horizontal as shown below:

The marks on the knees are considered to be steps by which the wearer will
ascend to heaven after her death. If a baby cries much it is also tattooed on
the nose and chin.

Page 389

12. Dormitory discipline

The Dhūmkuria fraternity, Colonel Dalton remarks, are, under the severest
penalties, bound down to secrecy in regard to all that takes place in their
dormitory; and even girls are punished if they dare to tell tales. They are not
allowed to join in the dances till the offence is condoned. They have a
regular system of fagging in this curious institution. The small boys serve
those of larger growth, shampoo their limbs, comb their hair, and so on, and
they are sometimes subjected to severe discipline to make men of them.

13. Disposal of the dead

The Oraons either bury or burn the dead. As the corpse is carried to the
grave, beginning from the first crossroads, they sprinkle a line of rice as far
as the grave or pyre. This is done so that the soul of the deceased may find
its way back to the house. Before the burial or cremation cooked food and
some small pieces of money are placed in the mouth of the corpse. They are
subsequently, however, removed or recovered from the ashes and taken by
the musicians as their fee. Some clothes belonging to the deceased and a
vessel with some rice are either burnt with the corpse or placed in the grave.
As the grave is being filled in they place a stalk of orai6 grass vertically on
the head of the corpse and gradually draw it upwards as the earth is piled on
the grave. They say that this is done in order to leave a passage for the air to
pass to the nostrils of the deceased. This is the grass from which reed pens
are made, and the stalk is hard and hollow. Afterwards they plant a root of
the same grass where the stalk is standing over the head of the corpse. On
the tenth day they sacrifice a pig and fowl and bury the legs, tail, ears and
nose of the pig in a hole with seven balls of iron dross. They then proceed to

Page 390

the grave scattering a little parched rice all the way along the path. Cooked
rice is offered at the grave. If the corpse has been burnt they pick up the
bones and place them in a pot, which is brought home and hung up behind
the dead man’s house. At night-time a relative sits inside the house watching
a burning lamp, while some friends go outside the village and make a
miniature hut with sticks and grass and set fire to it. They then call out to the
dead man, ‘Come, your house is being burnt,’ and walk home striking a
mattock and sickle together. On coming to the house they kick down the
matting which covers the doorway; the man inside says, ‘Who are you?’ and
they answer, ‘It is we.’ They watch the lamp and when the flame wavers they
believe it to show that the spirit of the deceased has followed them and has
also entered the house. Next day the bones are thrown into a river and the
earthen pot broken against a stone.

14. Worship of ancestors

The pitras or ancestors are worshipped at every festival, and when the new
rice is reaped a hen is offered to them. They pray to their dead parents to
accept the offering and then place a few grains of rice before the hen. If she
eats them, it is a sign that the ancestors have accepted the offering and a man
kills the hen by crushing its head with his closed fist. This is probably, as
remarked by Father Dehon, in recollection of the method employed before
the introduction of knives, and the same explanation may be given of the
barbaric method of the Baigas of crushing a pig to death by a beam of wood
used as a see-saw across its body, and of the Gond bride and bridegroom
killing a fowl by treading on it when they first enter their house after the
wedding.

15. Religion. The supreme deity

Page 391

The following account of the tribal religion is abridged from Father Dehon’s
full and interesting description:

“The Oraons worship a supreme god who is known as Dharmes; him they
invoke in their greatest difficulties when recourse to the village priests and
magicians has proved useless. Then they turn to Dharmes and say, ‘Now we
have tried everything, but we have still you who can help us.’ They sacrifice
to him a white cock. They think that god is too good to punish them, and that
they are not answerable to him in any way for their conduct; they believe
that everybody will be treated in the same way in the other world. There is
no hell for them or place of punishment, but everybody will go to merkha or
heaven. The Red Indians speak of the happy hunting-grounds and the Oraons
imagine something like the happy ploughing-grounds, where everybody will
have plenty of land, plenty of bullocks to plough it with, and plenty of rice-
beer to drink after his labour. They look on god as a big zamīndār or
landowner, who does nothing himself, but keeps a chaprāsi as an agent or
debt-collector; and they conceive the latter as having all the defects so
common to his profession. Baranda, the chaprāsi, exacts tribute from them
mercilessly, not exactly out of zeal for the service of his master, but out of
greed for his talbāna or perquisites. When making a sacrifice to Dharmes
they pray: ‘O god, from to-day do not send any more your chaprāsi to
punish us. You see we have paid our respects to you, and we are going to
give him his dastūri (tip).’

16. Minor godlings

“But in the concerns of this world, to obtain good crops and freedom from
sickness, a host of minor deities have to be propitiated. These consist of
bhūts or spirits of the household, the sept, the village, and common deities,
such as the earth and sun. Chola Pācho or the lady of the grove lives in the
sarna or sacred grove, which has been left standing when the forest was
cleared. She is credited with the power of giving rain and consequently good
crops. Churel is the shade of a woman who has died while pregnant or in

Page 392

childbirth. She hovers over her burial-place and is an object of horror and
fright to every passer-by. It is her nature to look out for a companion, and
she is said always to choose that member of a family whom she liked best
during her lifetime. She will then come at night and embrace him and tickle
him under the arms, making him laugh till he dies. Bhūla or the wanderers
are the shades of persons who have died an unnatural death, either having
been murdered, hanged, or killed by a tiger. They all keep the scars of their
respective wounds and one can imagine what a weird-looking lot they are.
They are always on the move, and are, as it were, the mendicant portion of
the invisible community. They are not very powerful and are responsible
only for small ailments, like nightmares and slight indispositions. When an
Ojha or spirit-raiser discovers that a Bhūla has appeared in the light of his
lamp he shows a disappointed face, and says: ‘Pshaw, only Bhūla!’ No
sacrifice is offered to him, but the Ojha then and there takes a few grains of
rice, rubs them in charcoal and throws them at the flame of his lamp, saying,
‘Take this, Bhūla, and go away.’ Mūrkuri is the thumping bhūt. Europeans to
show their kindness and familiarity thump people on the back. If this is
followed by fever or any kind of sickness it will be ascribed to the passing of
Mūrkuri from the body of the European into the body of the native.

“Chordewa is a witch rather than a bhūt. It is believed that some women
have the power to change their soul into a black cat, who then goes about in
the houses where there are sick people. Such a cat has a peculiar way of
mewing, quite different from its brethren, and is easily recognised. It steals
quietly into the house, licks the lips of the sick man and eats the food which
has been prepared for him. The sick man soon gets worse and dies. They say
it is very difficult to catch the cat, as it has all the nimbleness of its nature
and the cleverness of a bhūt. However, they sometimes succeed, and then
something wonderful happens. The woman out of whom the cat has come
remains insensible, as it were in a state of temporary death, until the cat re-
enters her body. Any wound inflicted on the cat will be inflicted on her; if
they cut its ears or break its legs or put out its eyes the woman will suffer the
same mutilation. The Oraons say that formerly they used to burn any woman
who was suspected of being a Chordewa.

Page 393

17. Human sacrifice

“There is also Anna Kuāri or Mahādhani, who is in our estimation the most
cruel and repulsive deity of all, as she requires human sacrifice. Those
savage people, who put good crops above everything, look upon her in a
different light. She can give good crops and make a man rich, and this covers
a multitude of sins. People may be sceptical about it and say that it is
impossible that in any part of India under the British Government there
should still be human sacrifices. Well, in spite of all the vigilance of the
authorities, there are still human sacrifices in Chota Nāgpur. As the vigilance
of the authorities increases, so also does the carefulness of the Urkas or
Otongas increase. They choose for their victims poor waifs or strangers,
whose disappearance no one will notice. April and May are the months in
which the Urkas are at work. Doīsa, Panāri, Kūkra and Sargūja have a very
bad reputation. During these months no strangers will go about the country
alone and during that time nowhere will boys and girls be allowed to go to
the jungle and graze the cattle for fear of the Urkas. When an Urka has found
a victim he cuts his throat and carries away the upper part of the ring finger
and the nose. Anna Kuāri finds votaries not only among the Oraons, but
especially among the big zamīndārs and Rājas of the Native States. When a
man has offered a sacrifice to Anna Kuāri she goes and lives in his house in
the form of a small child. From that time his fields yield double harvest, and
when he brings in his paddy he takes Anna Kuāri and rolls her over the heap
to double its size. But she soon becomes restless and is only pacified by new
human sacrifices. At last after some years she cannot bear remaining in the
same house any more and kills every one.”

18. Christianity

Page 394

In Jashpur State where the Oraons number 47,000 about half the total
number have become Christians. The non-Christians call themselves Sansār,
and the principal difference between them is that the Christians have cut off
the pigtail, while the Sansār retain it. In some families the father may be a
Sansār and the son a Kiristān, and they live together without any distinction.
The Christians belong to the Roman Catholic and Lutheran Missions, but
though they all know their Church, they naturally have little or no idea of the
distinctions of doctrine.

19. Festivals. The Karma or May-day

The principal festivals are the Sārhūl, celebrated when the sāl tree7 flowers,
the Karma or May-day when the rice is ready for planting out, and the
Kanihāri or harvest celebration.

“At the Karma festival a party of young people of both sexes,” says Colonel
Dalton, “proceed to the forest and cut a young karma tree (Nauclea
parvifolia) or the branch of one; they bear this home in triumph and plant it
in the centre of the Akhāra or wrestling ground. Next morning all may be
seen at an early hour in holiday array, the elders in groups under the fine old
tamarind trees that surround the Akhāra, and the youth of both sexes, arm-
linked in a huge circle, dancing round the karma tree, which, festooned with
garlands, decorated with strips of coloured cloth and sham bracelets and
necklets of plaited straw, and with the bright faces and merry laughter of the
young people encircling it, reminds one of the gift-bearing tree so often
introduced at our own great festival.” The tree, however, probably
corresponds to the English Maypole, and the festival celebrates the renewal
of vegetation.

Page 395

20. The sāl flower festival

At the Sārhūl festival the marriage of the sun-god and earth-mother is
celebrated, and this cannot be done till the sāl tree gives the flowers for the
ceremony. It takes place about the beginning of April on any day when the
tree is in flower. A white cock is taken to represent the sun and a black hen
the earth; their marriage is celebrated by marking them with vermilion, and
they are sacrificed. The villagers then accompany the Pāhan or Baiga, the
village priest, to the sarna or sacred grove, a remnant of the old sāl forest in
which is located Sarna Burhi or ‘The old women of the grove.’ “To this
dryad,” writes Colonel Dalton, “who is supposed to have great influence
over the rain (a superstition not improbably founded on the importance of
trees as cloud-compellers), the party offer five fowls, which are afterwards
eaten, and the remainder of the day is spent in feasting. They return laden
with the flowers of the sāl tree, and next morning with the Baiga pay a visit
to every house, carrying the flowers. The women of the village all stand on
the threshold of their houses, each holding two leaf-cups; one empty to
receive the holy water; the other with rice-beer for the Baiga. His reverence
stops at each house, and places flowers over it and in the hair of the women.
He sprinkles the holy water on the seeds that have been kept for the new
year and showers blessings on every house, saying, ‘May your rooms and
granary be filled with paddy that the Baiga’s name may be great.’ When this
is accomplished the woman throws a vessel of water over his venerable
person, heartily dousing the man whom the moment before they were
treating with such profound respect. This is no doubt a rain-charm, and is a
familiar process. The Baiga is prevented from catching cold by being given
the cup of rice-beer and is generally gloriously drunk before he completes
his round. There is now a general feast, and afterwards the youth of both
sexes, gaily decked with the sāl blossoms, the pale cream-white flowers of
which make the most becoming of ornaments against their dusky skins and
coal-black hair, proceed to the Akhāra and dance all night.”

Page 396

21. The harvest festival

The Kanihāri, as described by Father Dehon, is held previous to the
threshing of the rice, and none is allowed to prepare his threshing-floor until
it has been celebrated. It can only take place on a Tuesday. A fowl is
sacrificed and its blood sprinkled on the new rice. In the evening a common
feast is held at which the Baiga presides, and when this is over they go to the
place where Mahādeo is worshipped and the Baiga pours milk over the stone
that represents him. The people then dance. Plenty of rice-beer is brought,
and a scene of debauchery takes place in which all restraint is put aside.
They sing the most obscene songs and give vent to all their passions. On that
day no one is responsible for any breach of morality.

22. Fast for the crops

Like other primitive races, and the Hindus generally, the Oraons observe the
Lenten fast, as explained by Sir J.G. Frazer, after sowing their crops. Having
committed his seed with every propitiatory rite to the bosom of Mother
Earth, the savage waits with anxious expectation to see whether she will
once again perform on his behalf the yearly miracle of the renewal of
vegetation, and the growth of the corn-plants from the seed which the
Greeks typified by the descent of Proserpine into Hades for a season of the
year and her triumphant re-emergence to the upper air. Meanwhile he fasts
and atones for any sin or shortcoming of his which may possibly have
offended the goddess and cause her to hold her hand. From the beginning of
Asārh (June) the Oraons cease to shave, abstain from eating turmeric, and
make no leaf-plates for their food, but eat it straight from the cooking-vessel.

Page 397

This they now say is to prevent the field-mice from consuming the seeds of
the rice.

23. Physical appearance and costume of the Oraons

“The colour of most Oraons,” Sir H. Risley states, “is the darkest brown
approaching to black; the hair being jet-black, coarse and rather inclined to
be frizzy. Projecting jaws and teeth, thick lips, low narrow foreheads, and
broad flat noses are the features characteristic of the tribe. The eyes are often
bright and full, and no obliquity is observable in the opening of the eyelids.”

“The Oraon youths,” Dalton states, “though with features very far from
being in accordance with the statutes of beauty, are of a singularly pleasing
class, their faces beaming with animation and good humour. They are a
small race, averaging 4 feet 5 inches, but there is perfect proportion in all
parts of their form, and their supple, pliant, lithe figures are often models of
symmetry. There is about the young Oraon a jaunty air and mirthful
expression that distinguishes him from the Munda or Ho, who has more of
the dignified gravity that is said to characterise the North American Indian.
The Oraon is particular about his personal appearance only so long as he is
unmarried, but he is in no hurry to withdraw from the Dhūmkuria
community, and generally his first youth is passed before he resigns his
decorative propensities.

“He wears his hair long like a woman, gathered in a knot behind, supporting,
when he is in gala costume, a red or white turban. In the knot are wooden
combs and other instruments useful and ornamental, with numerous
ornaments of brass.8 At the very extremity of the roll of hair gleams a small
circular mirror set in brass, from which, and also from his ears, bright brass
chains with spiky pendants dangle, and as he moves with the springy elastic
step of youth and tosses his head like a high-mettled steed in the buoyancy
of his animal spirits, he sets all his glittering ornaments in motion and
displays as he laughs a row of teeth, round, white and regular, that give light

Page 398

and animation to his dusky features. He wears nothing in the form of a coat;
his decorated neck and chest are undraped, displaying how the latter tapers
to the waist, which the young dandies compress within the smallest compass.
In addition to the cloth, there is always round the waist a girdle of cords
made of tasar-silk or of cane. This is now a superfluity, but it is no doubt the
remnant of a more primitive costume, perhaps the support of the antique fig-
leaves.

“Out of the age of ornamentation nothing can be more untidy or more
unprepossessing than the appearance of the Oraon. The ornaments are nearly
all discarded, hair utterly neglected, and for raiment any rags are used. This
applies both to males and females of middle age.

24. Dress of women

“The dress of the women consists of one cloth, six yards long, gracefully
adjusted so as to form a shawl and a petticoat. The upper end is thrown over
the left shoulder and falls with its fringe and ornamented border prettily over
the back of the figure. Vast quantities of red beads and a large, heavy brass
ornament shaped like a torque are worn round the neck. On the left hand are
rings of copper, as many as can be induced on each finger up to the first
joint, on the right hand a smaller quantity; rings on the second toe only of
brass or bell-metal, and anklets and bracelets of the same material are also
worn.” The women wear only metal and not glass bangles, and this with the
three vertical tattoo-marks on the forehead and the fact that the head and
right arm are uncovered enables them to be easily recognised. “The hair is
made tolerably smooth and amenable by much lubrication, and false hair or
some other substance is used to give size to the mass into which it is
gathered not immediately behind, but more or less on one side, so that it lies
on the neck just behind and touching the right ear; and flowers are arranged
in a receptacle made for them between the roll of hair and the head.” Rings
are worn in the lobes of the ear, but not other ornaments. “When in dancing
costume on grand occasions they add to their head-dress plumes of heron

Page 399

feathers, and a gay bordered scarf is tightly bound round the upper part of
the body.”

25. Dances

“The tribe I am treating of are seen to best advantage at the great national
dance meetings called Jātras, which are held once a year at convenient
centres, generally large mango groves in the vicinity of old villages. As a
signal to the country round, the flags of each village are brought out on the
day fixed and set upon the road that leads to the place of meeting. This
incites the young men and maidens to hurry through their morning’s work
and look up their jātra dresses, which are by no means ordinary attire. Those
who have some miles to go put up their finery in a bundle to keep it fresh
and clean, and proceed to some tank or stream in the vicinity of the tryst
grove; and about two o’clock in the afternoon may be seen all around groups
of girls laughingly making their toilets in the open air, and young men in
separate parties similarly employed. When they are ready the drums are
beaten, huge horns are blown, and thus summoned the group from each
village forms its procession. In front are young men with swords and shields
or other weapons, the village standard-bearers with their flags, and boys
waving yaks’ tails or bearing poles with fantastic arrangements of garlands
and wreaths intended to represent umbrellas of dignity. Sometimes a man
riding on a wooden horse is carried, horse and all, by his friends as the Rāja,
and others assume the form of or paint themselves up to represent certain
beasts of prey. Behind this motley group the main body form compactly
together as a close column of dancers in alternate ranks of boys and girls,
and thus they enter the grove, where the meeting is held in a cheery dashing
style, wheeling and countermarching and forming lines, circles and columns
with grace and precision. The dance with these movements is called kharia,
and it is considered to be an Oraon rather than a Munda dance, though
Munda girls join in it. When they enter the grove the different groups join
and dance the kharia together, forming one vast procession and then a
monstrous circle. The drums and musical instruments are laid aside, and it is

Page 400

by the voices alone that the time is given; but as many hundreds, nay,
thousands, join, the effect is imposing. In serried ranks, so closed up that
they appear jammed, they circle round in file, all keeping perfect step, but at
regular intervals the strain is terminated by a hurūru, which reminds one of
Paddy’s ‘huroosh’ as he ‘welts the floor,’ and at the same moment they all
face inwards and simultaneously jumping up come down on the ground with
a resounding stamp that makes the finale of the movements, but only for a
momentary pause. One voice with a startling yell takes up the strain again, a
fresh start is made, and after gyrating thus till they tire of it the ring breaks
up, and separating into village groups they perform other dances
independently till near sunset, and then go dancing home.”

26. Social customs

But more often they go on all night. Mr. Ball mentions their dance as
follows:9 “The Oraon dance was distinct from any I had seen by the Santāls
or other races. The girls, carefully arranged in lines by sizes, with the tallest
at one end and the smallest at the other, firmly grasp one another’s hands,
and the whole movements are so perfectly in concert that they spring about
with as much agility as could a single individual.” Father Dehon gives the
following interesting notice of their social customs: “The Oraons are very
sociable beings, and like to enjoy life together. They are paying visits or
pahis to one another nearly the whole year round. In these the handia (beer-
jar) always plays a great part. Any man who would presume to receive
visitors without offering them a handia would be hooted and insulted by his
guests, who would find a sympathising echo from all the people of the
village. One may say that from the time of the new rice at the end of
September to the end of the marriage feast or till March there is a continual
coming and going of visitors. For a marriage feast forty handias are prepared
by the groom’s father, and all the people of the village who can afford it
supply one also. Each handia gives about three gallons of rice-beer, so that
in one day and a half, in a village of thirty houses, about 200 gallons of rice-
beer are despatched. The Oraons are famous for their dances. They delight in

Page 401

spending the whole night from sunset till morning in this most exciting
amusement, and in the dancing season they go from village to village. They
get, as it were, intoxicated with the music, and there is never any slackening
of the pace. On the contrary, the evolutions seem to increase till very early in
the morning, and it sometimes happens that one of the dancers shoots off
rapidly from the gyrating group, and speeds away like a spent top, and,
whirlwind-like, disappears through paddy-fields and ditches till he falls
entirely exhausted. Of course it is the devil who has taken possession of him.
One can well imagine in what state the dancers are at the first crow of the
cock, and when ‘L’aurore avec ses doigts de rose entr’ouvre les portes de
l’orient,’ she finds the girls straggling home one by one, dishevelled,
traînant l’aile, too tired even to enjoy the company of the boys, who remain
behind in small groups, still sounding their tom-toms at intervals as if sorry
that the performance was so soon over. And, wonderful to say and incredible
to witness, they will go straight to the stalls, yoke their bullocks, and work
the whole morning with the same spirit and cheerfulness as if they had spent
the whole night in refreshing sleep. At eleven o’clock they come home, eat
their meal, and stretched out in the verandah sleep like logs until two, when
poked and kicked about unmercifully by the people of the house, they
reluctantly get up with heavy eyes and weary limbs to resume their work.”

27. Social rules

The Oraons do not now admit outsiders into the tribe. There is no offence for
which a man is permanently put out of caste, but a woman living with any
man other than an Oraon is so expelled. Temporary expulsion is awarded for
the usual offences. The head of the caste panchāyat is called Panua, and
when an offender is reinstated, the Panua first drinks water from his hand,
and takes upon himself the burden of the erring one’s transgression. For this
he usually receives a fee of five rupees, and in some States the appointment
is in the hands of the Rāja, who exacts a fine of a hundred rupees or more
from a new candidate. The Oraons eat almost all kinds of food, including
pork, fowls and crocodiles, but abstain from beef. Their status is very low

Page 402

among the Hindus; they are usually made to live in a separate corner of the
village, and are sometimes not allowed to draw water from the village well.
As already stated, the dress of the men consists only of a narrow wisp of
cloth round the loins. Some of them say, like the Gonds, that they are
descended from the subjects of Rāwan, the demon king of Ceylon; this
ancestry having no doubt in the first instance been imputed to them by the
Hindus. And they explain that when Hanumān in the shape of a giant
monkey came to the assistance of Rāma, their king Rāwan tried to destroy
Hanumān by taking all the loin-cloths of his subjects and tying them soaked
in oil to the monkey’s tail with a view to setting them on fire and burning
him to death. The device was unsuccessful and Hanumān escaped, but since
then the subjects of Rāwan and their descendants have never had a sufficient
allowance of cloth to cover them properly.

28. Character

“The Oraons,” Colonel Dalton says, “if not the most virtuous, are the most
cheerful of the human race. Their lot is not a particularly happy one. They
submit to be told that they are especially created as a labouring class, and
they have had this so often dinned into their ears that they believe and admit
it. I believe they relish work if the taskmaster be not over-exacting. Oraons
sentenced to imprisonment without labour, as sometimes happens, for
offences against the excise laws, insist on joining the working gangs, and
wherever employed, if kindly treated, they work as if they felt an interest in
their task. In cold weather or hot, rain or sun, they go cheerfully about it, and
after some nine or ten hours of toil (seasoned with a little play and chaff
among themselves) they return blithely home in flower-decked groups
holding each other by the hand or round the waist and singing.”

Page 403

29. Language

The Kurukh language, Dr. Grierson states, has no written character, but the
gospels have been printed in it in the Devanāgri type. The translation is due
to the Rev. F. Halm, who has also published a Biblical history, a catechism
and other small books in Kurukh. More than five-sixths of the Oraons are
still returned as speaking their own language.

1 Linguistic Survey, vol. iv. p. 406.

2 Bengal Census Report (1901).
3 Ethnography, p. 248.

4 Tribes and Castes, vol. ii. p. 141.
5 Panna Lāl, Revenue Inspector.

6 Sorghum halepense.
7 Shorea robusta.

8 In Bilāspur the men have an iron comb in the hair with a circular end and two prongs like a fork.
Women do not wear this.
9 Jungle Life in India, p. 134.

Page 404

Pāik
Pāik.—A small caste of the Uriya country formed from military service, the
term pāik meaning ‘a foot-soldier.’ In 1901 the Pāiks numbered 19,000
persons in the Kālāhandi and Patna States and the Raipur District, but since
the transfer of the Uriya States to Bengal less than 3000 remain in the
Central Provinces. In Kālāhandi, where the bulk of them reside, they are
called Nalia Sipāhis from the fact that they were formerly armed with nalis
or matchlocks by the State. After the Khond rising of 1882 in Kālāhandi
these were confiscated and bows and arrows given in lieu of them. The Pāiks
say that they were the followers of two warriors, Kālmīr and Jaimīr, who
conquered the Kālāhandi and Jaipur States from the Khonds about a
thousand years ago. There is no doubt that they formed the rough militia of
the Uriya Rājas, a sort of rabble half military and half police, like the
Khandaits. But the Khandaits were probably the leaders and officers, and, as
a consequence, though originally only a mixed occupational group, have
acquired a higher status than the Pāiks and in Orissa rank next to the
Rājpūts. The Pāiks were the rank and file, mainly recruited from the forest
tribes, and they are counted as a comparatively low caste, though to
strangers they profess to be Rājpūts. In Sambalpur it is said that Rājpūts,
Sudhs, Bhuiyas and Gonds are called Pāiks. In Kālāhandi they wear the
sacred thread, being invested with it by a Brāhman at the time of their
marriage, and they say that this privilege was conferred on them by the Rāja.
It is reported, however, that social distinctions may be purchased in some of
the Uriya States for comparatively small sums. A Bhatra or member of a
forest tribe was observed wearing the sacred thread, and, on being
questioned, stated that his grandfather had purchased the right from the Rāja
for Rs. 50. The privileges of wearing gold ear ornaments, carrying an
umbrella, and riding on horseback were obtainable in a similar manner. It is
also related that when one Rāja imported the first pair of boots seen in his
State, the local landholders were allowed to wear them in turn for a few
minutes on payment of five rupees each, as a token of their right thereafter to
procure and wear boots of their own. In Damoh and Jubbulpore another set

Page 405

of Pāiks is to be found who also claim to be Rājpūts, and are commonly so
called, though true Rājpūts will not eat or intermarry with them. These are
quite distinct from the Sambalpur Pāiks, but have probably been formed into
a caste in exactly the same manner. The sept or family names of the Uriya
Pāiks sufficiently indicate their mixed descent. Some of them are as follows:
Dube (a Brāhman title), Chālak Bansi (of the Chalukya royal family), Chhit
Karan (belonging to the Karans or Uriya Kāyasths), Sahāni (a sais or
groom), Sudh (the name of an Uriya caste), Benet Uriya (a subdivision of
the Uriya or Od mason caste), and so on. It is clear that members of different
castes who became Pāiks founded separate families, which in time
developed into exogamous septs. Some of the septs will not eat food cooked
with water in company with the rest of the caste, though they do not object
to intermarrying with them. After her marriage a girl may not take food
cooked by her parents nor will they accept it from her. And at a marriage
party each guest is supplied with grain and cooks it himself, but everybody
will eat with the bride and bridegroom as a special concession to their
position. Besides the exogamous clans the Pāiks have totemistic gots or
groups named after plants and animals, as Harin (a deer), Kadamb (a tree),
and so on. But these have no bearing on marriage, and the bulk of the caste
have the Nāgesh or cobra as their sept name. It is said that anybody who
does not know his sept considers himself to be a Nāgesh, and if he does not
know his clan, he calls himself a Mahanti. Each family among the Pāiks has
also a Sainga or title, of a high-sounding nature, as Nāik (lord), Pujāri
(worshipper), Baidya (physician), Raut (noble), and so on. Marriages are
generally celebrated in early youth, but no penalty is incurred for a breach of
this rule. If the signs of adolescence appear in a girl for the first time on a
Tuesday, Saturday or Sunday, it is considered a bad omen, and she is
sometimes married to a tree to avert the consequences. Widow-marriage and
divorce are freely permitted. The caste burn their dead and perform the
shrāddh ceremony. The women are tattooed, and men sometimes tattoo their
arms with figures of the sun and moon in the belief that this will protect
them from snake-bite. The Pāiks eat flesh and fish, but abstain from fowls
and other unclean animals and from liquor. Brāhmans will not take water
from them, but other castes generally do so. Some of them are still employed
as armed retainers and are remunerated by free grants of land.

Page 406

Page 407

Panka
List of Paragraphs

1. Origin of the caste
2. Caste subdivisions
3. Endogamous divisions
4. Marriage
5. Religion
6. Other customs
7. Occupation

1. Origin of the caste

Panka.1—A Dravidian caste of weavers and labourers found in Mandla,
Raipur and Bilāspur, and numbering 215,000 persons in 1911. The name is a
variant on that of the Pān tribe of Orissa and Chota Nāgpur, who are also
known as Panika, Chīk, Gānda and by various other designations. In the
Central Provinces it has, however, a peculiar application; for while the Pan
tribe proper is called Gānda in Chhattīsgarh and the Uriya country, the
Pankas form a separate division of the Gāndas, consisting of those who have
become members of the Kabīrpanthi sect. In this way the name has been
found very convenient, for since Kabīr, the founder of the sect, was
discovered by a weaver woman lying on the lotus leaves of a tank, like
Moses in the bulrushes, and as a newly initiated convert is purified with
water, so the Pankas hold that their name Is pāni ka or ‘from water.’ As far as
possible then they disown their connection with the Gāndas, one of the most
despised castes, and say that they are a separate caste consisting of the

Page 408

disciples of Kabīr. This has given rise to the following doggerel rhyme about
them:

Pāni se Panka bhae, bundan rāche sharīr,
Age age Panka bhae, pāchhe Dās Kabīr.

Which may be rendered, ‘The Panka indeed is born of water, and his body is
made of drops of water, but there were Pankas before Kabīr.’ Or another
rendering of the second line is, ‘First he was a Panka, and afterwards he
became a disciple of Kabīr,’ Nevertheless the Pankas have been successful in
obtaining a somewhat higher position than the Gāndas, in that their touch is
not considered to convey impurity. This is therefore an instance of a body of
persons from a low caste embracing a new religion and thereby forming
themselves into a separate caste and obtaining an advance in social position.

2. Caste subdivisions

Of the whole caste 84 per cent are Kabīrpanthis and these form one subcaste;
but there are a few others. The Mānikpuria say that their ancestors came
from Mānikpur in Darbhanga State about three centuries ago; the Saktaha
are those who profess to belong to the Sakta sect, which simply means that
they eat flesh and drink liquor, being unwilling to submit to the restrictions
imposed on Kabīrpanthis; the Bajania are those who play on musical
instruments, an occupation which tends to lower them in Hindu eyes; and the
Dom Pankas are probably a section of the Dom or sweeper caste who have
somehow managed to become Pankas. The main distinction is however
between the Kabirha, who have abjured flesh and liquor, and the Saktaha,
who indulge in them; and the Saktaha group is naturally recruited from
backsliding Kabīrpanthis. Properly the Kabirha and Saktaha do not
intermarry, but if a girl from either section goes to a man of the other she
will be admitted into the community and recognised as his wife, though the
regular ceremony is not performed. The Saktaha worship all the ordinary

Page 409

village deities, but some of the Kabirha at any rate entirely refrain from
doing so, and have no religious rites except when a priest of their sect comes
round, when he gives them a discourse and they sing religious songs.

3. Endogamous divisions

The caste have a number of exogamous septs, many of which are named
after plants and animals: as Tandia an earthen pot, Chhura a razor, Neora the
mongoose, Parewa the wild pigeon, and others. Other septs are Panaria the
bringer of betel-leaf, Kuldīp the lamp-lighter, Pandwār the washer of feet,
Ghughua one who eats the leavings of the assembly, and Khetgarhia, one
who watches the fields during religious worship. The Sonwānia or ‘Gold-
water’ sept has among the Pankas, as with several of the primitive tribes, the
duty of readmitting persons temporarily put out of caste; while the Naurang
or nine-coloured sept may be the offspring of some illegitimate unions. The
Sati sept apparently commemorate by their name an ancestress who
distinguished herself by self-immolation, naturally a very rare occurrence in
so low a caste as the Pankas. Each sept has its own Bhāt or genealogist who
begs only from members of the sept and takes food from them.

4. Marriage

Marriage is prohibited between members of the same sept and also between
first cousins, and a second sister may not be married during the lifetime of
the first. Girls are usually wedded under twelve years of age. In Mandla the
father of the boy and his relatives go to discuss the match, and if this is
arranged each of them kisses the girl and gives her a piece of small silver.
When a Saktaha is going to look for a wife he makes a fire offering to Dūlha
Deo, the young bridegroom god, whose shrine is in the cook-room, and

Page 410

prays to him saying, ‘I am going to such and such a village to ask for a wife;
give me good fortune.’ The father of the girl at first refuses his consent as a
matter of etiquette, but finally agrees to let the marriage take place within a
year. The boy pays Rs. 9, which is spent on the feast, and makes a present of
clothes and jewels to the bride. In Chānda a chauka or consecrated space
spread with cowdung with a pattern of lines of flour is prepared and the
fathers of the parties stand inside this, while a member of the Pandwār sept
cries out the names of the gotras of the bride and bridegroom and says that
the everlasting knot is to be tied between them with the consent of five caste-
people and the sun and moon as witnesses. Before the wedding the betrothed
couple worship Mahādeo and Pārvati under the direction of a Brāhman, who
also fixes the date of the wedding. This is the only purpose for which a
Brāhman is employed by the caste. Between this date and that of the
marriage neither the boy nor girl should be allowed to go to a tank or cross a
river, as it is considered dangerous to their lives. The superstition has
apparently some connection with the belief that the Pankas are sprung from
water, but its exact meaning cannot be determined. If a girl goes wrong
before marriage with a man of the caste, she is given to him as wife without
any ceremony. Before the marriage seven small pitchers full of water are
placed in a bamboo basket and shaken over the bride’s head so that the water
may fall on her. The principal ceremony consists in walking round the sacred
pole called magrohan, the skirts of the pair being knotted together. In some
localities this is done twice, a first set of perambulations being called the
Kunwāri (maiden) Bhānwar, and the second one of seven, the Byāhi
(married) Bhānwar. After the wedding the bride and her relations return with
the bridegroom to his house, their party being known as Chauthia. The
couple are taken to a river and throw their tinsel wedding ornaments into the
water. The bride then returns home if she is a minor, and when she
subsequently goes to live with her husband the gauna ceremony is
performed. Widow-marriage is permitted, and divorce may be effected for
bad conduct on the part of the wife, the husband giving a sort of funeral
feast, called Marti jīti ka bhāt, to the castefellows. Usually a man gives
several warnings to his wife to amend her bad conduct before he finally casts
her off.

Page 411

5. Religion

The Pankas worship only Kabīr. They prepare a chauka and, sitting in it,
sing songs in his praise, and a cocoanut is afterwards broken and distributed
to those who are present. The assembly is presided over by a Mahant or
priest and the chauka is prepared by his subordinate called the Dīwān. The
offices of Mahant and Dīwān are hereditary, and they officiate for a
collection of ten or fifteen villages. Otherwise the caste perform no special
worship, but observe the full moon days of Māgh (January), Phāgun
(February) and Kārtik (October) as fasts in honour of Kabīr. Some of the
Kabirhas observe the Hindu festivals, and the Saktahas, as already stated,
have the same religious practices as other Hindus. They admit into the
community members of most castes except the impure ones. In Chhattīsgarh
a new convert is shaved and the other Pankas wash their feet over him in
order to purify him. He then breaks a stick in token of having given up his
former caste and is invested with a necklace of tulsi2 beads. A woman of any
such caste who has gone wrong with a man of the Panka caste may be
admitted after she has lived with him for a certain period on probation,
during which her conduct must be satisfactory, her paramour also being put
out of caste for the same time. Both are then shaved and invested with the
necklaces of tulsi beads. In Mandla a new convert must clean and whitewash
his house and then vacate it with his family while the Panch or caste
committee come and stay there for some time in order to purify it. While
they are there neither the owner nor any member of his family may enter the
house. The Panch then proceed to the riverside and cook food, after driving
the new convert across the river by pelting him with cowdung. Here he
changes his clothes and puts on new ones, and coming back again across the
stream is made to stand in the chauk and sip the urine of a calf. The chauk is
then washed out and a fresh one made with lines of flour, and standing in
this the convert receives to drink the dal, that is, water in which a little betel,
raw sugar and black pepper have been mixed and a piece of gold dipped. In
the evening the Panch again take their food in the convert’s house, while he

Page 412

eats outside it at a distance. Then he again sips the dal, and the Mahant or
priest takes him on his lap and a cloth is put over them both; the Mahant
whispers the mantra or sacred verse into his ear, and he is finally considered
to have become a full Kabirha Panka and admitted to eat with the Panch.

6. Other customs

The Pankas are strict vegetarians and do not drink liquor. A Kabirha Panka is
put out of caste for eating flesh meat. Both men and women generally wear
white clothes, and men have the garland of beads round the neck. The dead
are buried, being laid on the back with the head pointing to the north. After a
funeral the mourners bathe and then break a cocoanut over the grave and
distribute it among themselves. On the tenth day they go again and break a
cocoanut and each man buries a little piece of it in the earth over the grave.
A little cup made of flour containing a lamp is placed on the grave for three
days afterwards, and some food and water are put in a leaf cup outside the
house for the same period. During these days the family do not cook for
themselves but are supplied with food by their friends. After childbirth a
mother is supposed not to eat food during the time that the midwife attends
on her, on account of the impurity caused by this woman’s presence in the
room.

7. Occupation

The caste are generally weavers, producing coarse country cloth, and a
number of them serve as village watchmen, while others are cultivators and
labourers. They will not grow sān-hemp nor breed tasar silk cocoons. They
are somewhat poorly esteemed by their neighbours, who say of them,
‘Where a Panka can get a little boiled rice and a pumpkin, he will stay for

Page 413

ever,’ meaning that he is satisfied with this and will not work to get more.
Another saying is, ‘The Panka felt brave and thought he would go to war;
but he set out to fight a frog and was beaten’; and another, ‘Every man tells
one lie a day; but the Ahīr tells sixteen, the Chamār twenty, and the lies of
the Panka cannot be counted.’ Such gibes, however, do not really mean
much. Owing to the abstinence of the Pankas from flesh and liquor they rank
above the Gāndas and other impure castes. In Bilāspur they are generally
held to be quiet and industrious.3 In Chhattīsgarh the Pankas are considered
above the average in intelligence and sometimes act as spokesmen for the
village people and as advisers to zamīndārs and village proprietors. Some of
them become religious mendicants and act as gurus or preceptors to
Kabīrpanthis.4

1 This article is compiled from papers by Pyāre Lāl Misra, Ethnographic clerk, and Hazari Lāl,
Manager, Court of Wards, Chānda.
2 The basil plant.

3 Bilaspur Settlement Report (1868), p. 49.
4 From a note by Mr. Gauri Shankar, Manager, Court of Wards, Drūg.

Page 414

Panwār Rājpūt
List of Paragraphs

1. Historical notice. The Agnikula clans and the slaughter of the
Kshatriyas by Parasurāma
2. The legend of Parasurāma
3. The Panwār dynasty of Dhār and Ujjain
4. Diffusion of the Panwārs over India
5. The Nāgpur Panwārs
6. Subdivisions
7. Marriage customs
8. Widow-marriage
9. Religion
10. Worship of the spirits of those dying a violent death
11. Funeral rites
12. Caste discipline
13. Social customs

1. Historical notice. The Agnikula clans and the slaughter
of the Kshatriyas by Parasurāma

Panwār,1 Puar, Ponwār, Prāmara Rājpūt.—The Panwār or Pramāra is
one of the most ancient and famous of the Rājpūt clans. It was the first of the
four Agnikulas, who were created from the fire-pit on the summit of Mount
Abu after the Kshatriyas had been exterminated by Parasurāma the
Brāhman. “The fire-fountain was lustrated with the waters of the Ganges;2
expiatory rites were performed, and after a protracted debate among the gods
it was resolved that Indra should initiate the work of recreation. Having

Page 415

formed an image of dūba grass he sprinkled it with the water of life and
threw it into the fire-fountain. Thence on pronouncing the sajīvan mantra
(incantation to give life) a figure slowly emerged from the flame, bearing in
the right hand a mace and exclaiming, ‘Mār, Mār!’ (Slay, slay). He was
called Pramār; and Abu, Dhār, and Ujjain were assigned to him as a
territory.”

The four clans known as Agnikula, or born from the fire-pit, were the
Panwār, the Chauhān, the Parihār and the Chalukya or Solanki. Mr. D.R.
Bhandarkar adduces evidence in support of the opinion that all these were of
foreign origin, derived from the Gūjars or other Scythian or Hun tribes.3 And
it seems therefore not unlikely that the legend of the fire-pit may
commemorate the reconstitution of the Kshatriya aristocracy by the
admission of these tribes to Hinduism after its partial extinction during their
wars of invasion; the latter event having perhaps been euphemised into the
slaughter of the Kshatriyas by Parasurāma the Brāhman. A great number of
Indian castes date their origin from the traditional massacre of the Kshatriyas
by Parasurāma, saying that their ancestors were Rājpūts who escaped and
took to various occupations; and it would appear that an event which bulks
so largely in popular tradition must have some historical basis. It is
noticeable also that Buddhism, which for some five centuries since the time
of Asoka Maurya had been the official and principal religion of northern
India, had recently entered on its decline. “The restoration of the
Brāhmanical religion to popular favour and the associated revival of the
Sanskrit language first became noticeable in the second century, were
fostered by the satraps of Gujarāt and Surāshtra during the third, and made a
success by the Gupta emperors in the fourth century.4 The decline of
Buddhism and the diffusion of Sanskrit proceeded side by side with the
result that by the end of the Gupta period the force of Buddhism on Indian
soil had been nearly spent; and India with certain local exceptions had again
become the land of the Brāhman.5 The Gupta dynasty as an important power
ended about A.D. 490 and was overthrown by the Huns, whose leader
Toramāna was established at Mālwa in Central India prior to A.D. 500.”6
The revival of Brāhmanism and the Hun supremacy were therefore nearly
contemporaneous. Moreover one of the Hun leaders, Mihiragula, was a
strong supporter of Brāhmanism and an opponent of the Buddhists. Mr. V.A.

Page 416

Smith writes: “The savage invader, who worshipped as his patron deity Siva,
the god of destruction, exhibited ferocious hostility against the peaceful
Buddhist cult, and remorselessly overthrew the stūpas and monasteries,
which he plundered of their treasures.”7 This warrior might therefore well be
venerated by the Brāhmans as the great restorer of their faith and would
easily obtain divine honours. The Huns also subdued Rājputāna and Central
India and were dominant here for a time until their extreme cruelty and
oppression led to a concerted rising of the Indian princes by whom they were
defeated. The discovery of the Hun or Scythian origin of several of the
existing Rājpūt clans fits in well with the legend. The stories told by many
Indian castes of their first ancestors having been Rājpūts who escaped from
the massacre of Parasurāma would then have some historical value as
indicating that the existing occupational grouping of castes dates from the
period of the revival of the Brāhman cult after a long interval of Buddhist
supremacy. It is however an objection to the identification of Parasurāma
with the Huns that he is the sixth incarnation of Vishnu, coming before
Rāma and being mentioned in the Mahābhārata, and thus if he was in any
way historical his proper date should be long before their time. As to this it
may be said that he might have been interpolated or put back in date, as the
Brāhmans had a strong interest in demonstrating the continuity of the
Kshatriya caste from Vedic times and suppressing the Hun episode, which
indeed they have succeeded in doing so well that the foreign origin of
several of the most prominent Rājpūt clans has only been established quite
recently by modern historical and archaeological research. The name
Parasurāma signifies ‘Rāma with the axe’ and seems to indicate that this
hero came after the original Rāma. And the list of the incarnations of Vishnu
is not always the same, as in one list the incarnations are nearly all of the
animal type and neither Parasurāma, Rāma nor Krishna appear.

2. The legend of Parasurāma

The legend of Parasurāma is not altogether opposed to this view in itself.8
He was the son of a Brāhman Muni or hermit, named Jamadagni, by a lady,

Page 417

Renuka, of the Kshatriya caste. He is therefore not held to have been a
Brāhman and neither was he a true Kshatriya. This might portray the foreign
origin of the Huns. Jamadagni found his wife Renuka to be harbouring
thoughts of conjugal infidelity, and commanded his sons, one by one, to slay
her. The four elder ones successively refused, and being cursed by
Jamadagni lost all understanding and became as idiots; but the youngest,
Parasurāma, at his father’s bidding, struck off his mother’s head with a blow
of his axe. Jamadagni thereupon was very pleased and promised to give
Parasurāma whatever he might desire. On which Parasurāma begged first for
the restoration of his mother to life, with forgetfulness of his having slain her
and purification from all defilement; secondly, the return of his brothers to
sanity and understanding; and for himself that he should live long and be
invincible in battle; and all these boons his father bestowed. Here the hermit
Jamadagni might represent the Brāhman priesthood, and his wife Renuka
might be India, unfaithful to the Brāhmans and turning towards the Buddhist
heresy. The four elder sons would typify the princes of India refusing to
respond to the exhortations of the Brāhmans for the suppression of
Buddhism, and hence themselves made blind to the true faith and their
understandings darkened with Buddhist falsehood. But Parasurāma, the
youngest, killed his mother, that is, the Huns devastated India and
slaughtered the Buddhists; in reward for this he was made invincible as the
Huns were, and his mother, India, and his brothers, the indigenous princes,
regained life and understanding, that is, returned to the true Brāhman faith.
Afterwards, the legend proceeds, the king Kārrtavīrya, the head of the
Haihaya tribe of Kshatriyas, stole the calf of the sacred cow Kamdhenu from
Jamadagni’s hermitage and cut down the trees surrounding it. When
Parasurāma returned, his father told him what had happened, and he
followed Kārrtavīrya and killed him in battle. But in revenge for this the
sons of the king, when Parasurāma was away, returned to the hermitage and
slew the pious and unresisting sage Jamadagni, who called fruitlessly for
succour on his valiant son. When Parasurāma returned and found his father
dead he vowed to extirpate the whole Kshatriya race. ‘Thrice times seven
did he clear the earth of the Kshatriya caste,’ says the Mahābhārata. If the
first part of the story refers to the Hun conquest of northern India and the
overthrow of the Gupta dynasty, the second may similarly portray their
invasion of Rājputāna. The theft of the cow and desecration of Jamadagni’s

Page 418

hermitage by the Haihaya Rājpūts would represent the apostasy of the
Rājpūt princes to Buddhist monotheism, the consequent abandonment of the
veneration of the cow and the spoliation of the Brāhman shrines; while the
Hun invasions of Rājputāna and the accompanying slaughter of Rājpūts
would be Parasurāma’s terrible revenge.

3. The Panwār dynasty of Dhār and Ujjain

The Kings of Mālwa or Ujjain who reigned at Dhār and flourished from the
ninth to the twelfth centuries were of the Panwār clan. The seventh and ninth
kings of this dynasty rendered it famous.9 “Rāja Munja, the seventh king
(974–995), renowned for his learning and eloquence, was not only a patron
of poets, but was himself a poet of no small reputation, the anthologies
including various works from his pen. He penetrated in a career of conquest
as far as the Godāvari, but was finally defeated and executed there by the
Chalukya king. His nephew, the famous Bhoja, ascended the throne of Dhāra
about A.D. 1018 and reigned gloriously for more than forty years. Like his
uncle he cultivated with equal assiduity the arts of peace and war. Though
his fights with neighbouring powers, including one of the Muhammadan
armies of Mahmūd of Ghaznī, are now forgotten, his fame as an enlightened
patron of learning and a skilled author remains undimmed, and his name has
become proverbial as that of the model king according to the Hindu
standard. Works on astronomy, architecture, the art of poetry and other
subjects are attributed to him. About A.D. 1060 Bhoja was attacked and
defeated by the confederate kings of Gujarāt and Chedi, and the Panwār
kingdom was reduced to a petty local dynasty until the thirteenth century. It
was finally superseded by the chiefs of the Tomara and Chauhān clans, who
in their turn succumbed to the Muhammadans in 1401.” The city of Ujjain
was at this time a centre of Indian intellectual life. Some celebrated
astronomers made it their home, and it was adopted as the basis of the Hindu
meridional system like Greenwich in England. The capital of the state was
changed from Ujjain to Dhār or Dhāranāgra by the Rāja Bhoja already

Page 419

mentioned;10 and the name of Dhār is better remembered in connection with
the Panwārs than Ujjain.

A saying about it quoted by Colonel Tod was:

Jahān Puār tahān Dhār hai;
Aur Dhār jahān Puār;
Dhār bina Puār nahin;
Aur nahin Puār bina Dhār:

or, “Where the Panwār is there is Dhār, and Dhār is where the Panwār is;
without the Panwārs Dhār cannot stand, nor the Panwārs without Dhār.” It is
related that in consequence of one of his merchants having been held to
ransom by the ruler of Dhār, the Bhatti Rāja of Jaisalmer made a vow to
subdue the town. But as he found the undertaking too great for him, in order
to fulfil his vow he had a model of the city made in clay and was about to
break it up. But there were Panwārs in his army, and they stood out to defend
their mock capital, repeating as their reason the above lines; and in resisting
the Rāja were cut to pieces to the number of a hundred and twenty.11 There
is little reason to doubt that the incident, if historical, was produced by the
belief in sympathetic magic; the Panwārs really thought that by destroying
its image the Raja could effect injury to the capital itself,12 just as many
primitive races believe that if they make a doll as a model of an enemy and
stick pins into or otherwise injure it, the man himself is similarly affected. A
kindred belief prevails concerning certain mythical old kings of the Golden
Age of India, of whom it is said that to destroy their opponents all they had
to do was to collect a bundle of juāri stalks and cut off the heads, when the
heads of their enemies flew off in unison.

The Panwārs were held to have ruled from nine castles over the Marusthali
or ‘Region of death,’ the name given to the great desert of Rājputāna, which
extends from Sind to the Aravalli mountains and from the great salt lake to
the flat skirting the Garah. The principal of these castles were Abu, Nundore,
Umarkot, Arore, and Lodorva.13 And, ‘The world is the Prāmara’s,’ was
another saying expressive of the resplendent position of Dhāranāgra or

Page 420

Ujjain at this epoch. The siege and capture of the town by the
Muhammadans and consequent expulsion of the Panwārs are still a well-
remembered tradition, and certain castes of the Central Provinces, as the
Bhoyars and Korkus, say that their ancestors formed part of the garrison and
fled to the Satpūra hills after the fall of Dhāranāgra. Mr. Crooke14 states that
the expulsion of the Panwārs from Ujjain under their leader Mitra Sen is
ascribed to the attack of the Muhammadans under Shāhab-ud-dīn Ghori
about A.D. 1190.

4. Diffusion of the Panwārs over India

After this they spread to various places in northern India, and to the Central
Provinces and Bombay. The modern state of Dhār is or was recently still
held by a Panwār family, who had attained high rank under the Marāthas and
received it as a grant from the Peshwa. Malcolm considered them to be the
descendants of Rājpūt emigrants to the Deccan. He wrote of them:15 “In the
early period of Marātha history the family of Puār appears to have been one
of the most distinguished. They were of the Rājpūt tribe, numbers of which
had been settled in Mālwa at a remote era; from whence this branch had
migrated to the Deccan. Sivaji Puār, the first of the family that can be traced
in the latter country, was a landholder; and his grandsons, Sambaji and
Kāloji, were military commanders in the service of the celebrated Sivaji.
Anand Rao Puār was vested with authority to collect the Marātha share of
the revenue of Mālwa and Gujarāt in 1734, and he soon afterwards settled at
Dhār, which province, with the adjoining districts and the tributes of some
neighbouring Rājpūt chiefs, was assigned for the support of himself and his
adherents. It is a curious coincidence that the success of the Marāthas
should, by making Dhār the capital of Anand Rāo and his descendants,
restore the sovereignty of a race who had seven centuries before been
expelled from the government of that city and territory. But the present
family, though of the same tribe (Puār), claim no descent from the ancient
Hindu princes of Mālwa. They have, like all the Kshatriya tribes who
became incorporated with the Marāthas, adopted even in their modes of

Page 421

thinking the habits of that people. The heads of the family, with feelings
more suited to chiefs of that nation than Rājpūt princes, have purchased the
office of patel or headman in some villages in the Deccan; and their
descendants continue to attach value to their ancient, though humble, rights
of village officers in that quarter. Notwithstanding that these usages and the
connections they formed have amalgamated this family with the Marāthas,
they still claim, both on account of their high birth and of being officers of
the Rāja of Satāra (not of the Peshwa), rank and precedence over the houses
of Sindhia and Holkar; and these claims, even when their fortunes were at
the lowest ebb, were always admitted as far as related to points of form and
ceremony.” The great Marātha house of Nimbhālkar is believed to have
originated from ancestors of the Panwār Rājpūt clan. While one branch of
the Panwārs went to the Deccan after the fall of Dhār and marrying with the
people there became a leading military family of the Marāthas, the destiny of
another group who migrated to northern India was less distinguished. Here
they split into two, and the inferior section is described by Mr. Crooke as
follows:16 “The Khidmatiā, Barwār or Chobdār are said to be an inferior
branch of the Panwārs, descended from a low-caste woman. No high-caste
Hindu eats food or drinks water touched by them.” According to the Ain-i-
Akbari17 a thousand men of the sept guarded the environs of the palace of
Akbar, and Abul Fazl says of them: “The caste to which they belong was
notorious for highway robbery, and former rulers were not able to keep them
in check. The effective orders of His Majesty have led them to honesty; they
are now famous for their trustworthiness. They were formerly called Māwis.
Their chief has received the title of Khidmat Rao. Being near the person of
His Majesty he lives in affluence. His men are called Khidmatias.” Thus
another body of Panwārs went north and sold their swords to the Mughal
Emperor, who formed them into a bodyguard. Their case is exactly
analogous to that of the Scotch and Swiss Guards of the French kings. In
both cases the monarch preferred to entrust the care of his person to
foreigners, on whose fidelity he could the better rely, as their only means of
support and advancement lay in his personal favour, and they had no local
sympathies which could be used as a lever to undermine their loyalty.
Buchanan states that a Panwār dynasty ruled for a considerable period over
the territory of Shāhabād in Bengal. And Jagdeo Panwār was the trusted
minister of Sidhrāj, the great Solanki Rāja of Gujarāt. The story of the

Page 422

adventures of Jagdeo and his wife when they set out together to seek their
fortune is an interesting episode in the Rāsmāla. In the Punjab the Panwārs
are found settled up the whole course of the Sutlej and along the lower
Indus, and have also spread up the Biās into Jalandhar and Gurdāspur.18

5. The Nāgpur Panwārs

While the above extracts have been given to show how the Panwārs
migrated from Dhār to different parts of India in search of fortune, this
article is mainly concerned with a branch of the clan who came to Nāgpur,
and subsequently settled in the rice country of the Wainganga Valley. At the
end of the eleventh century Nāgpur appears to have been held by a Panwār
ruler as an appanage of the kingdom of Mālwa.19 It has already been seen
how the kings of Mālwa penetrated to Berār and the Godāvari, and Nāgpur
may well also have fallen to them. Mr. Muhammad Yūsuf quotes an
inscription as existing at Bhāndak in Chānda of the year A.D. 1326, in which
it is mentioned that the Panwār of Dhār repaired a statue of Jag Nārāyan in
that place.20 Nothing more is heard of them in Nāgpur, and their rule
probably came to an end with the subversion of the kingdom of Mālwa in the
thirteenth century. But there remain in Nāgpur and in the districts of
Bhandāra, Bālāghāt and Seoni to the north and east of it a large number of
Panwārs, who have now developed into an agricultural caste. It may be
surmised that the ancestors of these people settled in the country at the time
when Nāgpur was held by their clan, and a second influx may have taken
place after the fall of Dhār. According to their own account, they first came
to Nagardhan, an older town than Nāgpur, and once the headquarters of the
locality. One of their legends is that the men who first came had no wives,
and were therefore allowed to take widows of other castes into their houses.
It seems reasonable to suppose that something of this kind happened, though
they probably did not restrict themselves to widows. The existing family
names of the caste show that it is of mixed ancestry, but the original Rājpūt
strain is still perfectly apparent in their fair complexions, high foreheads and
in many cases grey eyes. The Panwārs have still the habit of keeping women

Page 423

of lower castes to a greater degree than the ordinary, and this has been found
to be a trait of other castes of mixed origin, and they are sometimes known
as Dhākar, a name having the sense of illegitimacy. Though they have lived
for centuries among a Marāthi-speaking people, the Panwārs retain a dialect
of their own, the basis of which is Bagheli or eastern Hindi. When the
Marāthas established themselves at Nāgpur in the eighteenth century some
of the Panwārs took military service under them and accompanied a general
of the Bhonsla ruling family on an expedition to Cuttack. In return for this
they were rewarded with grants of the waste and forest lands in the valley of
the Wainganga river, and here they developed great skill in the construction
of tanks and the irrigation of rice land, and are the best agricultural caste in
this part of the country. Their customs have many points of interest, and, as
is natural, they have abandoned many of the caste observances of the
Rājpūts. It is to this group of Panwārs21 settled in the Marātha rice country
of the Wainganga Valley that the remainder of this article is devoted.

Transplanting rice

Page 424

6. Subdivisions

They number about 150,000 persons, and include many village proprietors
and substantial cultivators. The quotations already given have shown how
this virile clan of Rājpūts travelled to the north, south and east from their
own country in search of a livelihood. Everywhere they made their mark so
that they live in history, but they paid no regard to the purity of their Rājpūt
blood and took to themselves wives from the women of the country as they
could get them. The Panwārs of the Wainganga Valley have developed into a
caste marrying among themselves. They have no subcastes but thirty-six
exogamous sections. Some of these have the names of Rājpūt clans, while
others are derived from villages, titles or names of offices, or from other
castes. Among the titular names are Chaudhri (headman), Patlia (patel or
chief officer of a village) and Sonwānia (one who purifies offenders among
the Gonds and other tribes). Among the names of other castes are Bopcha or
Korku, Bhoyar (a caste of cultivators), Pārdhi (hunter), Kohli (a local
cultivating caste) and Sahria (from the Saonr tribe). These names indicate
how freely they have intermarried. It is noticeable that the Bhoyars and
Korkus of Betūl both say that their ancestors were Panwārs of Dhār, and the
occurrence of both names among the Panwārs of Bālāghāt may indicate that
these castes also have some Panwār blood. Three names, Rahmat (kind),
Turukh or Turk, and Farīd (a well-known saint), are of Muhammadan origin,
and indicate intermarriage in that quarter.

7. Marriage customs

Girls are usually, but not necessarily, wedded before adolescence.
Occasionally a Panwār boy who cannot afford a regular marriage will enter

Page 425

his prospective father-in-law’s house and serve him for a year or more, when
he will obtain a daughter in marriage. And sometimes a girl will contract a
liking for some man or boy of the caste and will go to his house, leaving her
home. In such cases the parents accept the accomplished fact, and the couple
are married. If the boy’s parents refuse their consent they are temporarily put
out of caste, and subsequently the neighbours will not pay them the
customary visits on the occasions of family joys and griefs. Even if a girl has
lived with a man of another caste, as long as she has not borne a child, she
may be re-admitted to the community on payment of such penalty as the
elders may determine. If her own parents will not take her back, a man of the
same gotra or section is appointed as her guardian and she can be married
from his house.

The ceremonies of a Panwār marriage are elaborate. Marriage-sheds are
erected at the houses both of the bride and bridegroom in accordance with
the usual practice, and just before the marriage, parties are given at both
houses; the village watchman brings the toran or string of mango-leaves,
which is hung round the marriage-shed in the manner of a triumphal arch,
and in the evening the party assembles, the men sitting at one side of the
shed and the women at the other. Presents of clothes are made to the child
who is to be married, and the following song is sung:

The mother of the bride grew angry and went away to the mango
grove.
Come soon, come quickly, Mother, it is the time for giving clothes.
The father of the bridegroom has sent the bride a fold of cloth from
his house,
The fold of it is like the curve of the winnowing-fan, and there is a
bodice decked with coral and pearls.

Before the actual wedding the father of the bridegroom goes to the bride’s
house and gives her clothes and other presents, and the following is a
specimen given by Mr. Muhammad Yūsuf of the songs sung on this
occasion:

Page 426

Five years old to-day is Bāja Bai the bride;
Send word to the mother of the bridegroom;
Her dress is too short, send for the Koshta, Husband;
The Koshta came and wove a border to the dress.

Afterwards the girl’s father goes and makes similar presents to the
bridegroom. After many preliminary ceremonies the marriage procession
proper sets forth, consisting of men only. Before the boy starts his mother
places her breast in his mouth; the maid-servants stand before him with
vessels of water, and he puts a pice in each. During the journey songs are
sung, of which the following is a specimen:

The linseed and gram are in flower in Chait.22
O! the boy bridegroom is going to another country;
O Mother! how may he go to another country?
Make payment before he enters another country;
O Mother! how may he cross the border of another country?
Make payment before he crosses the border of another country;
O Mother! how may he touch another’s bower?
Make payment before he touches another’s bower;
O Mother! how shall he bathe with strange water?
Make payment before he bathes with strange water;
O Mother! how may he eat another’s banwat?23
Make payment before he eats another’s banwat;
O Mother! how shall he marry another woman?
He shall wed her holding the little finger of her left hand.

The bridegroom’s party are always driven to the wedding in bullock-carts,
and when they approach the bride’s village her people also come to meet
them in carts. All the party then turn and race to the village, and the winner
obtains much distinction. The cartmen afterwards go to the bridegroom’s
father and he has to make them a present of from one to forty rupees. On
arriving at the village the bridegroom is carried to Devi’s shrine in a man’s
arms, while four other men hold a canopy over him, and from there to the
marriage-shed. He touches a bamboo of this, and a man seated on the top

Page 427

pours turmeric and water over his head. Five men of the groom’s party go to
the bride’s house carrying salt, and here their feet are washed and the tīka or
mark of anointing is made on their foreheads. Afterwards they carry rice in
the same manner and with this is the wedding-rice, coloured yellow with
turmeric and known as the Lagun-gāth. Before sunset the bridegroom goes
to the bride’s house for the wedding. Two baskets are hung before Dulha
Deo’s shrine inside the house, and the couple are seated in these with a cloth
between them. The ends of their clothes are knotted, each places the right
foot on the left foot of the other and holds the other’s ear with the hand.
Meanwhile a Brāhman has climbed on to the roof of the house, and after
saying the names of the bride and bridegroom shouts loudly, ‘Rām nawara,
Sīta nawari, Saodhān,’ or ‘Rām, the Bridegroom, and Sīta, the Bride, pay
heed,’ The people inside the house repeat these words and someone beats on
a brass plate; the wedding-rice is poured over the heads of the couple, and a
quid of betel is placed first in the mouth of one and then of the other. The
bridegroom’s party dance in the marriage-shed and their feet are washed.
Two plough-yokes are brought in and a cloth spread over them, and the
couple are seated on them face to face. A string of twisted grass is drawn
round their necks and a thread is tied round their marriage-crowns. The
bride’s dowry is given and her relatives make presents to her. This property
is known as khamora, and is retained by a wife for her own use, her husband
having no control over it. It is customary also in the caste for the parents to
supply clothes to a married daughter as long as they live, and during this
period a wife will not accept any clothes from her husband. On the following
day the maid-servants bring a present of gulāl or red powder to the fathers of
the bride and bridegroom, who sprinkle it over each other. The bridegroom’s
father makes them a present of from one to twenty rupees according to his
means, and also gives suitable fees to the barber, the washerman, the Barai
or betel-leaf seller and the Bhāt or bard. The maid-servants then bring
vessels of water and throw it over each other in sport. After the evening
meal, the party go back, the bride and bridegroom riding in the same cart. As
they start the women sing:

Let us go to the basket-maker
And buy a costly pair of fans;
Fans worth a lot of money;

Page 428

Let us praise the mother of the bride.

8. Widow-marriage

After a few days at her husband’s house the bride returns home, and though
she pays short visits to his family from time to time, she does not go to live
with her husband until she is adolescent, when the usual pathoni or going-
away ceremony is performed to celebrate the event. The people repeat a set
of verses containing advice which the bride’s mother is supposed to give her
on this occasion, in which the desire imputed to the caste to make money out
of their daughters is satirised. They are no doubt libellous as being a gross
exaggeration, but may contain some substratum of truth. The gist of them is
as follows: “Girl, if you are my daughter, heed what I say. I will make you
many sweetmeats and speak words of wisdom. Always treat your husband
better than his parents. Increase your private money (khamora) by selling
rice and sugar; abuse your sisters-in-law to your husband’s mother and
become her favourite. Get influence over your husband and make him come
with you to live with us. If you cannot persuade him, abandon your modesty
and make quarrels in the household. Do not fear the village officers, but go
to the houses of the patel24 and Pāndia25 and ask them to arrange your
quarrel.”

It is not intended to imply that Panwār women behave in this manner, but the
passage is interesting as a sidelight on the joint family system. It concludes
by advising the girl, if she cannot detach her husband from his family, to
poison him and return as a widow. This last counsel is a gibe at the custom
which the caste have of taking large sums of money for a widow on her
second marriage. As such a woman is usually adult, and able at once to
perform the duties of a wife and to work in the fields, she is highly valued,
and her price ranges from Rs. 25 to Rs. 1000. In former times, it is stated,
the disposal of widows did not rest with their parents but with the Sendia or
headman of the caste. The last of them was Karūn Panwār of Tumsar, who
was empowered by the Bhonsla Rāja of Nāgpur to act in this manner, and

Page 429

was accustomed to receive an average sum of Rs. 25 for each widow or
divorced woman whom he gave away in marriage. His power extended even
to the reinstatement of women expelled from the caste, whom he could
subsequently make over to any one who would pay for them. At the end of
his life he lost his authority among the people by keeping a Dhīmar woman
as a mistress, and he had no successor. A Panwār widow must not marry
again until the expiry of six months after her husband’s death. The stool on
which a widow sits for her second marriage is afterwards stolen by her
husband’s friends. After the wedding when she reaches the boundary of his
village the axle of her cart is removed, and a new one made of tendu wood is
substituted for it. The discarded axle and the shoes worn by the husband at
the ceremony are thrown away, and the stolen stool is buried in a field.
These things, Mr. Hīra Lāl points out, are regarded as defiled, because they
have been accessories in an unlucky ceremony, that of the marriage of a
widow. On this point Dr. Jevons writes26 that the peculiar characteristic of
taboo is this transmissibility of its infection or contagion. In ancient Greece
the offerings used for the purification of the murderer became themselves
polluted during the process and had to be buried. A similar reasoning applies
to the articles employed in the marriage of a widow. The wood of the tendu
or ebony tree27 is chosen for the substituted axle, because it has the valuable
property of keeping off spirits and ghosts. When a child is born a plank of
this wood is laid along the door of the room to keep the spirits from
troubling the mother and the newborn infant. In the same way, no doubt, this
wood keeps the ghost of the first husband from entering with the widow into
her second husband’s village. The reason for the ebony-wood being a spirit-
scarer seems to lie in its property of giving out sparks when burnt. “The
burning wood gives out showers of sparks, and it is a common amusement to
put pieces in a camp fire in order to see the column of sparks ascend.”28 The
sparks would have a powerful effect on the primitive mind and probably
impart a sacred character to the tree, and as they would scare away wild
animals, the property of averting spirits might come to attach to the wood.
The Panwārs seldom resort to divorce, except in the case of open and
flagrant immorality on the part of a wife. “They are not strict,” Mr. Low
writes,29 “in the matter of sexual offences within the caste, though they
bitterly resent and if able heavily avenge any attempt on the virtue of their
women by an outsider. The men of the caste are on the other hand somewhat

Page 430

notorious for the freedom with which they enter into relations with the
women of other castes.” They not infrequently have Gond and Ahīr girls
from the families of their farmservants as members of their households.

9. Religion

The caste worship the ordinary Hindu divinities, and their household god is
Dūlha Deo, the deified bridegroom. He is represented by a nut and a date,
which are wrapped in a cloth and hung on a peg in the wall of the house
above the platform erected to him. Every year, or at the time of a marriage or
the birth of a first child, a goat is offered to Dūlha Deo. The animal is
brought to the platform and given some rice to eat. A dedicatory mark of red
ochre is made on its forehead and water is poured over the body, and as soon
as it shivers it is killed. The shivering is considered to be an indication from
the deity that the sacrifice is acceptable. The flesh is cooked and eaten by the
family inside the house, and the skin and bones are buried below the floor.
Nārāyan Deo or Vishnu or the Sun is represented by a bunch of peacock’s
feathers. He is generally kept in the house of a Mahār, and when his worship
is to be celebrated he is brought thence in a gourd to the Panwār’s house, and
a black goat, rice and cakes are offered to him by the head of the household.
While the offering is being made the Mahār sings and dances, and when the
flesh of the goat is eaten he is permitted to sit inside the Panwār’s house and
begin the feast, the Panwārs eating after him. On ordinary occasions a Mahār
is not allowed to come inside the house, and any Panwār who took food with
him would be put out of caste; and this rite is no doubt a recognition of the
position of the Mahārs as the earlier residents of the country before the
Panwārs came to it. The Turukh or Turk sept of Panwārs pay a similar
worship to Bāba Farīd, the Muhammadan saint of Girar. He is also
represented by a bundle of peacock’s feathers, and when a goat is sacrificed
to him a Muhammadan kills it and is the first to partake of its flesh.

Page 431

10. Worship of the spirits of those dying a violent death

When a man has been killed by a tiger (bāgh) he is deified and worshipped
as Bāgh Deo. A hut is made in the yard of the house, and an image of a tiger
is placed inside and worshipped on the anniversary of the man’s death. The
members of the household will not afterwards kill a tiger, as they think the
animal has become a member of the family. A man who is bitten by a cobra
(nāg) and dies is similarly worshipped as Nāg Deo. The image of a snake
made of silver or iron is venerated, and the family will not kill a snake. If a
man is killed by some other animal, or by drowning or a fall from a tree, his
spirit is worshipped as Ban Deo or the forest god with similar rites, being
represented by a little lump of rice and red lead. In all these cases it is
supposed, as pointed out by Sir James Frazer, that the ghost of the man who
has come to such an untimely end is especially malignant, and will bring
trouble upon the survivors unless appeased with sacrifices and offerings. A
good instance of the same belief is given by him in Psyche’s Task30 as found
among the Karens of Burma: “They put red, yellow and white rice in a
basket and leave it in the forest, saying: Ghosts of such as died by falling
from a tree, ghosts of such as died of hunger or thirst, ghosts of such as died
by the tiger’s tooth or the serpent’s fang, ghosts of the murdered dead, ghosts
of such as died by smallpox or cholera, ghosts of dead lepers, oh ill-treat us
not, seize not upon our persons, do us no harm! Oh stay here in this wood!
We will bring hither red rice, yellow rice, and white rice for your
subsistence.”

That the same superstition is generally prevalent in the Central Provinces
appears to be shown by the fact that among castes who practise cremation,
the bodies of men who come to a violent end or die of smallpox or leprosy
are buried, though whether burial is considered as more likely to prevent the
ghost from walking than cremation, is not clear. Possibly, however, it may be
considered that the bodies are too impure to be committed to the sacred fire.

Page 432

11. Funeral rites

Cremation of the dead is the rule, but the bodies of those who have not died
a natural death are buried, as also of persons who are believed to have been
possessed of the goddess Devi in their lifetime. The bodies of small children
are buried when the Khīr Chatai ceremony has not been performed. This
takes place when a child is about two years old: he is invited to the house of
some member of the same section on the Diwāli day and given to eat some
Khīr or a mess of new rice with milk and sugar, and thus apparently is held
to become a proper member of the caste, as boys do in other castes on
having their ears pierced. When a corpse is to be burnt a heap of cowdung
cakes is made, on which it is laid, while others are spread over it, together
with butter, sugar and linseed. The fire with which the pyre is kindled is
carried by the son or other chief mourner in an earthen pot at the head of the
corpse. After the cremation the ashes of the body are thrown into water, but
the bones are kept by the chief mourner; his head and face are then shaved
by the barber, and the hair is thrown into the water with most of the bones;
he may retain a few to carry them to the Nerbudda at a convenient season,
burying them meanwhile under a mango or pīpal tree. A present of a rupee or
a cow may be made to the barber. After the removal of a dead body the
house is swept, and the rubbish with the broom and dustpan are thrown away
outside the village. Before the body is taken away the widow of the dead
man places her hands on his breast and forehead, and her bangles are broken
by another widow. The shrāddh ceremony is performed every year in the
month of Kunwār (September) on the same day of the fortnight as that on
which the death took place. On the day before the ceremony the head of the
household goes to the houses of those whom he wishes to invite, and sticks
some grains of rice on their foreheads. The guests must then fast up to the
ceremony. On the following day, when they arrive at noon, the host, wearing
a sacred thread of twisted grass, washes their feet with water in which the
sacred kusa grass has been mixed, and marks their foreheads with sandal-
paste and rice. The leaf-plates of the guests are set out inside the house, and

Page 433

a very small quantity of cooked rice is placed in each. The host then gathers
up all this rice and throws it on to the roof of the house while his wife throws
up some water, calling aloud the name of the dead man whose shrāddh
ceremony is being performed, and after this the whole party take their
dinner.

12. Caste discipline

As has been shown, the Panwārs have abandoned most of the distinctive
Rājpūt customs. They do not wear the sacred thread and they permit the
remarriage of widows. They eat the flesh of goats, fowls, wild pig, game-
birds and fish, but abstain from liquor except on such ceremonial occasions
as the worship of Nārāyan Deo, when every one must partake of it. Mr. Low
states that the injurious habit of smoking madak (a preparation of opium) is
growing in the caste. They will take water to drink from a Gond’s hand and
in some localities even cooked food. This is the outcome of their close
association in agriculture, the Gonds having been commonly employed as
farmservants by Panwār cultivators. A Brāhman usually officiates at their
ceremonies, but his presence is not essential and his duties may be
performed by a member of the caste. Every Panwār male or female has a
guru or spiritual preceptor, who is either a Brāhman, a Gosain or a Bairāgi.
From time to time the guru comes to visit his chela or disciple, and on such
occasions the chauk or sacred place is prepared with lines of wheat-flour.
Two wooden stools are set within it and the guru and his chela take their
seats on these. Their heads are covered with a new piece of cloth and the
guru whispers some text into the ear of the disciple. Sweetmeats and other
delicacies are then offered to the guru, and the disciple makes him a present
of one to five rupees. When a Panwār is put out of caste two feasts have to
be given on reinstatement, known as the Maili and Chokhi Roti (impure and
pure food). The former is held in the morning on the bank of a tank or river
and is attended by men only. A goat is killed and served with rice to the
caste-fellows, and in serious cases the offender’s head and face are shaved,
and he prays, ‘God forgive me the sin, it will never be repeated.’ The Chokhi

Page 434

Roti is held in the evening at the offender’s house, the elders and women as
well as men of the caste being present. The Sendia or leader of the caste eats
first, and he will not begin his meal unless he finds a douceur of from one to
five rupees deposited beneath his leaf-plate. The whole cost of the ceremony
of readmission is from fifteen to fifty rupees.

13. Social customs

The Panwār women wear their clothes tied in the Hindustāni and not in the
Marātha fashion. They are tattooed on the legs, hands and face, the face
being usually decorated with single dots which are supposed to enhance its
beauty, much after the same fashion as patches in England. Padmākar, the
Saugor poet, Mr. Hīra Lāl remarks, compared the dot on a woman’s chin to a
black bee buried in a half-ripe mango. The women, Mr. Low says, are
addicted to dances, plays and charades, the first being especially graceful
performances. They are skilful with their fingers and make pretty grass mats
and screens for the house, and are also very good cooks and appreciate
variety in food. The Panwārs do not eat off the ground, but place their dishes
on little iron stands, sitting themselves on low wooden stools. The housewife
is a very important person, and the husband will not give anything to eat or
drink out of the house without her concurrence. Mr. Low writes on the
character and abilities of the Panwārs as follows: “The Panwār is to Bālāghāt
what the Kunbi is to Berār or the Gūjar to Hoshangābād, but at the same
time he is less entirely attached to the soil and its cultivation, and much more
intelligent and cosmopolitan than either. One of the most intelligent officials
in the Agricultural Department is a Panwār, and several members of the caste
have made large sums as forest and railway contractors in this District;
Panwār shikāris are also not uncommon. They are generally averse to
sedentary occupations, and though quite ready to avail themselves of the
advantages of primary education, they do not, as a rule, care to carry their
studies to a point that would ensure their admission to the higher ranks of
Government service. Very few of them are to be found as patwāris,
constables or peons. They are a handsome race, with intelligent faces,

Page 435

unusually fair, with high foreheads, and often grey eyes. They are not, as a
rule, above middle height, but they are active and hard-working and by no
means deficient in courage and animal spirits, or a sense of humour. They
are clannish in the extreme, and to elucidate a criminal case in which no one
but Panwārs are concerned, and in a Panwār village, is usually a harder task
than the average local police officer can tackle. At times they are apt to
affect, in conversation with Government officials, a whining and unpleasant
tone, especially when pleading their claim to some concession or other; and
they are by no means lacking in astuteness and are good hands at a bargain.
But they are a pleasant, intelligent and plucky race, not easily cast down by
misfortune and always ready to attempt new enterprises in almost any
direction save those indicated by the Agricultural Department.

“In the art of rice cultivation they are past masters. They are skilled tank-
builders, though perhaps hardly equal to the Kohlis of Chānda. But they
excel especially in the mending and levelling of their fields, in neat
transplantation, and in the choice and adaptation of the different varieties of
rice to land of varying qualities. They are by no means specially efficient as
labourers, though they and their wives do their fair share of field work; but
they are well able to control the labour of others, especially of aborigines,
through whom most of their tank and other works are executed.”

1 With the exception of the historical notice, this article is principally based on a paper by Mr.
Muhammad Yusuf, reader to Mr. C.E. Low, Deputy Commissioner of Bālāghāt.

2 Tod’s Rājasthān, ii. p. 407.
3 Foreign elements in the Hindu population, Ind. Ant. (January 1911), vol. xl.

4 Early History of India (Oxford, Clarendon Press), 3rd ed., p. 303.
5 Ibidem, 2nd ed., p. 288.

6 Ibidem, p. 316.
7 Early History of India (Oxford, Clarendon Press), 3rd ed., p. 319.

8 Garret’s Classical Dictionary of Hinduism, s.v. Jamadagni and Rāma.
9 The following extract is taken from Mr. V.A. Smith’s Early History of India, 3rd ed. pp. 395, 396.
The passage has been somewhat abridged in reproduction.

Page 436

10 Malcolm, i. p. 26.

11 Rājasthān, ii. p. 215.
12 A similar instance in Europe is related by Colonel Tod, concerning the origin of the Madrid
Restaurant in the Bois de Boulogne at Paris. After Francis I had been captured by the Spaniards
he was allowed to return to his capital, on pledging his parole that he would go back to Madrid. But
the delights of liberty and Paris were too much for honour; and while he wavered a hint was thrown
out similar to that of destroying the clay city. A mock Madrid arose in the Bois de Boulogne, to which
Francis retired. (Rājasthān, ii. p. 428.)

13 Rājasthān, ii. pp. 264, 265.
14 Tribes and Castes, art. Panwār.

15 Memoir of Central India, i. 96.
16 Tribes and Castes, art. Panwār.

17 Blockmann, i. 252, quoted by Crooke.
18 Ibbetson, P.C.R., para. 448.

19 His name, Lakshma Deva, is given in a stone inscription dated A.D. 1104–1105.
20 The inscription is said to be in one of the temples in Winj Bāsini, near Bhāndak, in the Devanāgri
character in Marāthi, and to run as follows: “Consecration of Jagnārāyan (the serpent of the
world). Dajíanashnaku, the son of Chogneka, he it was who consecrated the god. The Panwār, the ruler
of Dhār, was the third repairer of the statue. The image was carved by Gopināth Pandit, inhabitant of
Lonār Mehkar. Let this shrine be the pride of all the citizens, and let this religious act be notified to the
chief and other officers.”

21 A few Panwār Rājpūts are found in the Saugor District, but they are quite distinct from those of
the Marātha country, and marry with the Bundelas. They are mentioned in the article on that clan.
22 March.

23 Rice boiled with milk and sugar.
24 Village headman.

25 Patwāri or village accountant.
26 Introduction to the History of Religion, p. 59.

27 Diospyros tomentosa.
28 Gamble, Manual of Indian Timbers, p. 461.

Page 437

29 Bālāghāt District Gazetteer.
30 P. 62, quoting from Bringand, Les Karens de la Birmanie, Les Missions Catholiques, xx. (1888),
p. 208.

Page 438

Page 439

Pardhān
List of Paragraphs

1. General notice
2. Tribal Subdivisions
3. Marriage
4. Religion
5. Social Customs
6. Methods of cheating among Pathāris
7. Musicians and priests

1. General notice

Pardhān, Pathāri, Panāl.—An inferior branch of the Gond tribe whose
occupation is to act as the priests and minstrels of the Gonds. In 1911 the
Pardhāns numbered nearly 120,000 persons in the Central Provinces and
Berār. The only other locality where they are found is Hyderābād, which
returned 8000. The name Pardhān is of Sanskrit origin and signifies a
minister or agent. It is the regular designation of the principal minister of a
Rājpūt State, who often fulfils the functions of a Mayor of the Palace. That it
was applied to the tribe in this sense is shown by the fact that they are also
known as Diwān, which has the same meaning. There is a tradition that the
Gond kings employed Pardhāns as their ministers, and as the Pardhāns acted
as genealogists they may have been more intelligent than the Gonds, though
they are in no degree less illiterate. To themselves and their Gond relations
the Pardhāns are frequently not known by that name, which has been given
to them by the Hindus, but as Panāl. Other names for the tribe are Parganiha,
Desai and Pathāri. Parganiha is a title signifying the head of a pargana, and

Page 440

is now applied by courtesy to some families in Chhattīsgarh. Desai has the
same signification, being a variant of Deshmukh or the Marātha revenue
officer in charge of a circle of villages. Pathāri means a bard or genealogist,
or according to another derivation a hillman. On the Satpūra plateau and in
Chhattīsgarh the tribe is known as Pardhān Pathāria. In Bālāghāt they are
also called Mokāsi. The Gonds themselves look down on the Pardhāns and
say that the word Pathāria means inferior, and they relate that Bura Deo,
their god, had seven sons. These were talking together one day as they dined
and they said that every caste had an inferior branch to do it homage, but
they had none; and they therefore agreed that the youngest brother and his
descendants should be inferior to the others and make obeisance to them,
while the others promised to treat him almost as their equal and give him a
share in all the offerings to the dead. The Pardhāns or Pathārias are the
descendants of the youngest brother and they accost the Gonds with the
greeting ‘Bābu Johār,’ or ‘Good luck, sir.’ The Gonds return the greeting by
saying ‘Pathāri Johār,’ or ‘How do you do, Pathāri.’ Curiously enough Johār
is also the salutation sent by a Rājpūt chief to an inferior landholder,1 and the
custom must apparently have been imitated by the Gonds. A variant of the
story is that one day the seven Gond brothers were worshipping their god,
but he did not make his appearance; so the youngest of them made a musical
instrument out of a string and a piece of wood and played on it. The god was
pleased with the music and came down to be worshipped, and hence the
Pardhāns as the descendants of the youngest brother continue to play on the
kingri or lyre, which is their distinctive instrument. The above stories have
been invented to account for the social inferiority of the Pardhāns to the
Gonds, but their position merely accords with the general rule that the bards
and genealogists of any caste are a degraded section. The fact is somewhat
contrary to preconceived ideas, but the explanation given of it is that such
persons make their living by begging from the remainder of the caste and
hence are naturally looked down upon by them; and further, that in pursuit of
their calling they wander about to attend at wedding feasts all over the
country, and consequently take food with many people of doubtful social
position. This seems a reasonable interpretation of the rule of the inferiority
of the bard, which at any rate obtains generally among the Hindu castes.

Page 441

Group of Pardhāns

2. Tribal Subdivisions

Page 442

The tribe have several endogamous divisions, of which the principal are the
Rāj Pardhāns, the Gānda Pardhāns and the Thothia Pardhāns. The Rāj
Pardhāns appear to be the descendants of alliances between Raj Gonds and
Pardhān women. They say that formerly the priests of Bura Deo lived a
celibate life, and both men and women attended to worship the god; but on
one occasion the priests ran away with some women and after this the Gonds
did not know who should be appointed to serve the deity. While they were
thus perplexed, a kingri (or rude wooden lyre) fell from heaven on to the lap
of one of them, and, in accordance with this plain indication of the divine
will, he became the priest, and was the ancestor of the Rāj Pardhāns; and
since this contretemps the priests are permitted to marry, while women are
no longer allowed to attend the worship of Bura Deo. The Thothia subtribe
are said to be the descendants of illicit unions, the word Thothia meaning
‘maimed’; while the Gāndas are the offspring of intermarriages between the
Pardhāns and members of that degraded caste. Other groups are the Mādes
or those of the Mād country in Chānda and Bastar, the Khalotias or those of
the Chhattīsgarh plain, and the Deogarhias of Deogarh in Chhindwāra; and
there are also some occupational divisions, as the Kandres or bamboo-
workers, the Gaitas who act as priests in Chhattīsgarh, and the Arakhs who
engage in service and sell old clothes. A curious grouping is found in
Chānda, where the tribe are divided into the Gond Pathāris and Chor or
‘Thief’ Pathāris. The latter have obtained their name from their criminal
propensities, but they are said to be proud of it and to refuse to intermarry
with any families not having the designation of Chor Pathāri. In Raipur the
Pathāris are said to be the offspring of Gonds by women of other castes, and
the descendants of such unions. The exogamous divisions of the Pardhāns
are the same as those of the Gonds, and like them they are split up into
groups worshipping different numbers of gods whose members may not
marry with one another.

3. Marriage

Page 443

A Pardhān wedding is usually held in the bridegroom’s village in some
public place, such as the market or cross-roads. The boy wears a blanket and
carries a dagger in his hand. The couple walk five times round in a circle,
after which the boy catches hold of the girl’s hand. He tries to open her fist
which she keeps closed, and when he succeeds in this he places an iron ring
on her little finger and puts his right toe over that of the girl’s. The
officiating priest then ties the ends of their clothes together and five chickens
are killed. The customary bride-price is Rs. 12, but it varies in different
localities. A widower taking a girl bride has, as a rule, to pay a double price.
A widow is usually taken in marriage by her deceased husband’s younger
brother.

4. Religion

As the priests of the Gonds, the Pardhāns are employed to conduct the
ceremonial worship of their great god Bura Deo, which takes place on the
third day of the bright fortnight of Baisākh (April). Many goats or pigs are
then offered to him with liquor, cocoanuts, betel-leaves, flowers, lemons and
rice. Bura Deo is always enshrined under a tree outside the village, either of
the mahua or sāj (Terminalia tomentosa) varieties. In Chhattīsgarh the
Gonds say that the origin of Bura Deo was from a child born of an illicit
union between a Gond and a Rāwat woman. The father murdered the child
by strangling it, and its spirit then began to haunt and annoy the man and all
his relations, and gradually extended its attentions to all the Gonds of the
surrounding country. It finally consented to be appeased by a promise of
adoration from the whole tribe, and since then has been installed as the
principal deity of the Gonds. The story is interesting as showing how
completely devoid of any supernatural majesty or power is the Gond
conception of their principal deity.

Page 444

5. Social Customs

Like the Gonds, the Pardhāns will eat almost any kind of food, including
beef, pork and the flesh of rats and mice, but they will not eat the leavings of
others. They will take food from the hands of Gonds, but the Gonds do not
return the compliment. Among the Hindus generally the Pardhāns are much
despised, and their touch conveys impurity while that of a Gond does not.
Every Pardhān has tattooed on his left arm near the inside of the elbow a
dotted figure which represents his totem or the animal, plant or other natural
object after which his sept is named. Many of them have a better type of
countenance than the Gonds, which is perhaps due to an infusion of Hindu
blood. They are also generally more intelligent and cunning. They have
criminal propensities, and the Pathārias of Chhattīsgarh are especially noted
for cattle-lifting and thieving. Writing forty years ago Captain Thomson2
described the Pardhāns of Seoni as bearing the very worst of characters,
many of them being regular cattle-lifters and gang robbers. In some parts of
Seoni they had become the terror of the village proprietors, whose houses
and granaries they fired if they were in any way reported on or molested.
Since that time the Pardhāns have become quite peaceable, but they still
have a bad reputation for petty thieving.

6. Methods of cheating among Pathāris

In Chhattīsgarh one subdivision is said to be known as Sonthaga (sona, gold,
and thag, a cheat), because they cheat people by passing counterfeit gold.
Their methods were described as follows in 1872 by Captain McNeill,
District Superintendent of Police:3 “They procure a quantity of the dry bark
of the pīpal,4 mahua,5 tamarind or gular6 trees and set it on fire; when it has

Page 445

become red-hot it is raked into a small hole and a piece of well-polished
brass is deposited among the glowing embers. It is constantly moved and
turned about and in ten or fifteen minutes has taken a deep orange colour
resembling gold. It is then placed in a small heap of wood-ashes and after a
few minutes taken out again and carefully wrapped in cotton-wool. The
peculiar orange colour results from the sulphur and resin in the bark being
rendered volatile. They then proceed to dispose of the gold, sometimes going
to a fair and buying cattle. On concluding a bargain they suddenly find they
have no money, and after some hesitation reluctantly produce the gold, and
say they are willing to part with it at a disadvantage, thereby usually
inducing the belief that it has been stolen. The cupidity of the owner of the
cattle is aroused, and he accepts the gold at a rate which would be very
advantageous if it were genuine. At other times they join a party of pilgrims,
to which some of their confederates have already obtained admission in
disguise, and offer to sell their gold as being in great want of money. A piece
is first sold to the confederates on very cheap terms and the other pilgrims
eagerly participate.” It would appear that the Pathāris have not much to learn
from the owners of buried treasure or the confidence or three-card trick
performers of London, and their methods are in striking contrast to the
guileless simplicity usually supposed to be a characteristic of the primitive
tribes. Mr. White states that “All the property acquired is taken back to the
village and there distributed by a panchāyat or committee, whose head is
known as Mokāsi. The Mokāsi is elected by the community and may also be
deposed by it, though he usually holds office for life; to be a successful
candidate for the position of Mokāsi one should have wealth and experience
and it is not a disadvantage to have been in jail. The Mokāsi superintends the
internal affairs of the community and maintains good relations with the
proprietor and village watchman by means of gifts.”

7. Musicians and priests

The Pardhāns and Pathāris are also, as already stated, village musicians, and
their distinctive instrument the kingri or kingadi is described by Mr. White

Page 446

as consisting of a stick passed through a gourd. A string or wire is stretched
over this and the instrument is played with the fingers. Another kind
possesses three strings of woven horse-hair and is played with the help of a
bow. The women of the Gānda Pardhān subtribe act as midwives. Mr.
Tawney wrote of the Pardhāns of Chhindwāra:7 “The Rāj-Pardhāns are the
bards of the Gonds and they can also officiate as priests, but the Bhumka
generally acts in the latter capacity and the Pardhāns confine themselves to
singing the praises of the god. At every public worship in the Deo-khalla or
dwelling-place of the gods, there should, if possible, be a Pardhān, and great
men use them on less important occasions. They cannot even worship their
household gods or be married without the Pardhāns. The Rāj-Pardhāns are
looked down on by the Gonds, and considered as somewhat inferior, seeing
that they take the offerings at religious ceremonies and the clothes of the
dear departed at funerals. This has never been the business of a true Gond,
who seems never happier than when wandering in the jungle, and who above
all things loves his axe, and next to that a tree to chop at. There is nothing in
the ceremonies or religion of the Pardhāns to distinguish them from the
Gonds.”

1 Tod’s Rājasthān, i. p. 165. But Johār is a common term of salutation among the Hindus.
2 Seoni Settlement Report (1867), p. 43.

3 From a collection of notes on Pathāris by various police officers. The passage is somewhat
abridged in reproduction.
4 Ficus R.

5 Bassia latifolia.
6 Ficus glomerata.

7 Note already quoted.

Page 447

Pārdhi
List of Paragraphs

1. General notice of the caste
2. Subdivisions
3. Marriage and funeral customs
4. Religion
5. Dress, food and social customs
6. Ordeals
7. Methods of catching birds
8. Hunting with leopards
9. Decoy stags
10. Hawks
11. Crocodile fishing
12. Other occupations and criminal practices

1. General notice of the caste

Pārdhi,1 Bahelia, Mīrshikār, Moghia, Shikāri, Tākankar.—A low caste
of wandering fowlers and hunters. They numbered about 15,000 persons in
the Central Provinces and Berār in 1911, and are found scattered over
several Districts. These figures include about 2000 Bahelias. The word
Pārdhi is derived from the Marāthi paradh, hunting. Shikāri, the common
term for a native hunter, is an alternative name for the caste, but particularly
applied to those who use firearms, which most Pārdhis refuse to do. Moghia
is the Hindustāni word for fowler, and Tākankar is the name of a small
occupational offshoot of the Pārdhis in Berār, who travel from village to
village and roughen the household grinding-mills when they have worn

Page 448

smooth. The word is derived from tākna, to tap or chisel. The caste appears
to be a mixed group made up of Bāwarias or other Rājpūt outcastes, Gonds
and social derelicts from all sources. The Pārdhis perhaps belong more
especially to the Marātha country, as they are numerous in Khāndesh, and
many of them talk a dialect of Gujarāti. In the northern Districts their speech
is a mixture of Mārwāri and Hindi, while they often know Marāthi or Urdu
as well. The name for the similar class of people in northern India is Bahelia,
and in the Central Provinces the Bahelias and Pārdhis merge into one
another and are not recognisable as distinct groups. The caste is recruited
from the most diverse elements, and women of any except the impure castes
can be admitted into the community; and on this account their customs differ
greatly in different localities. According to their own legends the first
ancestor of the Pārdhis was a Gond, to whom Mahādeo taught the art of
snaring game so that he might avoid the sin of shooting it; and hence the
ordinary Pārdhis never use a gun.

2. Subdivisions

Like other wandering castes the Pārdhis have a large number of endogamous
groups, varying lists being often given in different areas. The principal
subcastes appear to be the Shikāri or Bhīl Pārdhis, who use firearms; the
Phānse Pārdhis, who hunt with traps and snares; the Langoti Pārdhis, so
called because they wear only a narrow strip of cloth round the loins; and the
Tākankars. Both the Tākankars and Langotis have strong criminal
tendencies. Several other groups are recorded in different Districts, as the
Chitewāle, who hunt with a tame leopard; the Gāyake, who stalk their prey
behind a bullock; the Gosain Pārdhis, who dress like religious mendicants in
ochre-coloured clothes and do not kill deer, but only hares, jackals and
foxes; the Shīshi ke Telwāle, who sell crocodile’s oil; and the Bandarwāle
who go about with performing monkeys. The Bahelias have a subcaste
known as Kārijāt, the members of which only kill birds of a black colour.
Their exogamous groups are nearly all those of Rājpūt tribes, as Sesodia,
Panwār, Solanki, Chauhān, Rāthor, and soon; it is probable that these have

Page 449

been adopted through imitation by vagrant Bāwarias and others sojourning
in Rājputāna. There are also a few groups with titular or other names, and it
is stated that members of clans bearing Rājpūt names will take daughters
from the others in marriage, but will not give their daughters to them.

3. Marriage and funeral customs

Girls appear to be somewhat scarce in the caste and a bride-price is usually
paid, which is given as Rs. 9 in Chānda, Rs. 35 in Bilāspur, and Rs. 60 or
more in Hoshangābād and Saugor. If a girl should be seduced by a man of
the caste she would be united to him by the ceremony of a widow’s
marriage: but her family will require a bride from her husband’s family in
exchange for the girl whose value he has destroyed. Even if led astray by an
outsider a girl may be readmitted into the caste; and in the extreme case of
her being debauched by her brother, she may still be married to one of the
community, but no one will take food from her hands during her lifetime,
though her children will be recognised as proper Pārdhis. A special fine of
Rs. 100 is imposed on a brother who commits this crime. The ceremony of
marriage varies according to the locality in which they reside; usually the
couple walk seven times round a tānda or collection of their small mat tents.
In Berār a cloth is held up by four poles as a canopy over them and they are
preceded by a married woman carrying five pitchers of water. Divorce and
the marriage of widows are freely permitted. The caste commonly bury their
dead, placing the head to the north. They do not shave their heads in token of
mourning.

4. Religion

Page 450

In Berār their principal deity is the goddess Devi, who is known by different
names. Every family of Langoti Pārdhis has, Mr. Gayer states,2 its image in
silver of the goddess, and because of this no Langoti Pārdhi woman will
wear silver below the waist or hang her sāri on a peg, as it must never be put
on the same level as the goddess. They also sometimes refuse to wear red or
coloured clothes, one explanation for this being that the image of the
goddess is placed on a bed of red cloth. In Hoshangābād their principal deity
is called Guraiya Deo, and his image, consisting of a human figure embossed
in silver, is kept in a leather bag on the west side of their tents; and for this
reason women going out of the encampment for a necessary purpose always
proceed to the east. They also sleep with their feet to the east. Goats are
offered to Guraiya Deo and their horns are placed in his leather bag. In
Hoshangābād they sacrifice a fowl to the ropes of their tents at the Dasahra
and Diwāli festivals, and on the former occasion clean their hunting
implements and make offerings to them of turmeric and rice. They are
reported to believe that the sun and moon die and are reborn daily. The
hunter’s calling is one largely dependent on luck or chance, and, as might be
expected, the Pārdhis are firm believers in omens, and observe various rules
by which they think their fortune will be affected. A favourite omen is the
simple device of taking some rice or juāri in the hand and counting the
grains. Contrary to the usual rule, even numbers are considered lucky and
odd ones unlucky. If the first result is unsatisfactory a second or third trial
may be made. If a winnowing basket or millstone be let fall and drop to the
right hand it is a lucky omen, and similarly if a flower from Devi’s garland
should fall to the right side. The bellowing of cows, the mewing of a cat, the
howling of a jackal and sneezing are other unlucky omens. If a snake passes
from left to right it is a bad omen and if from right to left a good one. A man
must not sleep with his head on the threshold of a house or in the doorway of
a tent under penalty of a fine of Rs. 2–8; the only explanation given of this
rule is that such a position is unlucky because a corpse is carried out across
the threshold. A similar penalty is imposed if he falls down before his wife
even by accident. A Pārdhi, with the exception of members of the Sesodia
clan, must never sleep on a cot, a fine of five rupees being imposed for a
breach of this rule. A man who has once caught a deer must not again have
the hair of his head touched by a razor, and thus the Pārdhis may be
recognised by their long and unkempt locks. A breach of this rule is punished

Page 451

with a fine of fifteen rupees, but it is not observed everywhere. A woman
must never step across the rope or peg of a tent, nor upon the place where
the blood of a deer has flowed on to the ground. During her monthly period
of impurity a woman must not cross a river nor sit in a boat. A Pārdhi will
never kill or sell a dog and they will not hunt wild dogs even if money is
offered to them. This is probably because they look upon the wild dog as a
fellow-hunter, and consider that to do him injury would bring ill-luck upon
themselves. A Pārdhi has also theoretically a care for the preservation of
game. When he has caught a number of birds in his trap, he will let a pair of
them loose so that they may go on breeding. Women are not permitted to
take any part in the work of hunting, but are confined strictly to their
household duties. A woman who kicks her husband’s stick is fined Rs. 2–8.
The butt end of the stick is employed for mixing vegetables and other
purposes, but the meaning of the rule is not clear unless one of its uses is for
the enforcement of conjugal discipline. A Pārdhi may not swear by a dog, a
cat or a squirrel. Their most solemn oath is in the name of their deity
Guraiya Deo, and it is believed that any one who falsely takes this oath will
become a leper. The Phāns Pārdhis may not travel in a railway train, and
some of them are forbidden even to use a cart or other conveyance.

5. Dress, food and social customs

In dress and appearance the Pārdhis are disreputable and dirty. Their features
are dark and their hair matted and unkempt. They never wear shoes and say
that they are protected by a special promise of the goddess Devi to their first
ancestor that no insect or reptile in the forests should injure them. The truth
is, no doubt, that shoes would make it impossible for them to approach their
game without disturbing it, and from long practice the soles of their feet
become impervious to thorns and minor injuries. Similarly the Langoti
Pārdhis are so called because they wear only a narrow strip of cloth round
the loins, the reason probably being that a long one would impede them by
flapping and catching in the brushwood. But the explanation which they
themselves give,3 a somewhat curious one in view of their appearance, is

Page 452

that an ordinary dhoti or loin-cloth if worn might become soiled and
therefore unlucky. Their women do not have their noses pierced and never
wear spangles or other marks on the forehead. The Pārdhis still obtain fire by
igniting a piece of cotton with flint and iron. Mr. Sewell notes that their
women eat at the same time as the men, instead of after them as among most
Hindus. They explain this custom by saying that on one occasion a woman
tried to poison her husband and it was therefore adopted as a precaution
against similar attempts; but no doubt it has always prevailed, and the more
orthodox practice would be almost incompatible with their gipsy life.
Similar reasons of convenience account for their custom of celebrating
marriages all the year round and neglecting the Hindu close season of the
four months of the rains. They travel about with little huts made of matting,
which can be rolled up and carried off in a few minutes. If rain comes on
they seek shelter in the nearest village.4 In some localities the caste eat no
food cooked with butter or oil. They are usually considered as an impure
caste, whose touch is a defilement to Hindus. Brāhmans do not officiate at
their ceremonies, though the Pārdhis resort to the village Joshi or astrologer
to have a propitious date indicated for marriages. They have to pay for such
services in money, as Brāhmans usually refuse to accept even uncooked
grain from them. After childbirth women are held to be impure and
forbidden to cook for their families for a period varying from six weeks to
six months. During their periodical impurity they are secluded for four, six
or eight days, the Pārdhis observing very strict rules in these matters, as is
not infrequently the case with the lowest castes. Their caste meetings, Mr.
Sewell states, are known as Deokāria or ‘An act performed in honour of
God’; at these meetings arrangements for expeditions are discussed and caste
disputes decided. The penalty for social offences is a fine of a specified
quantity of liquor, the liquor provided by male and female delinquents being
drunk by the men and women respectively. The punishment for adultery in
either sex consists in cutting off a piece of the left ear with a razor, and a
man guilty of intercourse with a prostitute is punished as if he had
committed adultery. The Pārdhi women are said to be virtuous.

Page 453

6. Ordeals

The Pārdhis still preserve the primitive method of trial by ordeal. If a woman
is suspected of misconduct she is made to pick a pice coin out of boiling oil;
or a pīpal leaf is placed on her hand and a red-hot axe laid over it, and if her
hand is burnt or she refuses to stand the test she is pronounced guilty. Or, in
the case of a man, the accused is made to dive into water; and as he dives an
arrow is shot from a bow. A swift runner fetches and brings back the arrow,
and if the diver can remain under water until the runner has returned he is
held to be innocent. In Nimār, if an unmarried girl becomes pregnant, two
cakes of dough are prepared, a piece of silver being placed in one and a lump
of coal in the other. The girl takes one of the cakes, and if it is found to
contain the coal she is expelled from the community, while if she chooses
the piece of silver, she is pardoned and made over to one of the caste. The
idea of the ordeal is apparently to decide the question whether her condition
was caused by a Pārdhi or an outsider.

7. Methods of catching birds

The Phāns Pārdhis hunt all kinds of birds and the smaller animals with the
phānda or snare. Mr. Ball describes their procedure as follows:5 “For
peacock, sāras crane and bustard they have a long series of nooses, each
provided with a wooden peg and all connected with a long string. The
tension necessary to keep the nooses open is afforded by a slender slip of
antelope’s horn (very much resembling whalebone), which forms the core of
the loop. Provided with several sets of these nooses, a trained bullock and a
shield-like cloth screen dyed buff and pierced with eye-holes, the bird-
catcher sets out for the jungle, and on seeing a flock of pea-fowl circles

Page 454

round them under cover of the screen and the bullock, which he guides by a
nose-string. The birds feed on undisturbed, and the man rapidly pegs out his
long strings of nooses, and when all are properly disposed, moves round to
the opposite side of the birds and shows himself; when they of course run
off, and one or more getting their feet in the nooses fall forwards and flap on
the ground; the man immediately captures them, knowing that if the strain is
relaxed the nooses will open and permit of the bird’s escape. Very cruel
practices are in vogue with these people with reference to the captured birds,
in order to keep them alive until a purchaser is found. The peacocks have a
feather passed through the eyelids, by which means they are effectually
blinded, while in the case of smaller birds both the legs and wings are
broken.” Deer, hares and even pig are also caught by a strong rope with
running nooses. For smaller birds the appliance is a little rack about four
inches high with uprights a few inches apart, between each of which is hung
a noose. Another appliance mentioned by Mr. Ball is a set of long conical
bag nets, which are kept open by hooks and provided with a pair of folding
doors. The Pārdhi has also a whistle made of deer-horn, with which he can
imitate the call of the birds. Tree birds are caught with bird-lime as described
by Sir G. Grierson.6 The Bahelia has several long shafts of bamboos called
nāl or nār, which are tied together like a fishing rod, the endmost one being
covered with bird-lime. Concealing himself behind his bamboo screen the
Bahelia approaches the bird and when near enough strikes and secures it
with his rod; or he may spread some grain out at a short distance, and as the
birds are hopping about over it he introduces the pole, giving it a zig-zag
movement and imitating as far as possible the progress of a snake. Having
brought the point near one of the birds, which is fascinated by its stealthy
approach, he suddenly jerks it into its breast and then drawing it to him,
releases the poor palpitating creature, putting it away in his bag, and
recommences the same operation. This method does not require the use of
bird-lime.

8. Hunting with leopards

Page 455

The manner in which the Chita Pārdhis use the hunting leopard (Felis
jubata) for catching deer has often been described.7 The leopard is caught
full-grown by a noose in the manner related above. Its neck is first clasped in
a wooden vice until it is half-strangled, and its feet are then bound with
ropes and a cap slipped over its head. It is partially starved for a time, and
being always fed by the same man, after a month or so it becomes tame and
learns to know its master. It is then led through villages held by ropes on
each side to accustom it to the presence of human beings. On a hunting party
the leopard is carried on a cart, hooded, and, being approached from down
wind, the deer allow the cart to get fairly close to them. The Indian antelope
or black-buck are the usual quarry, and as these frequent cultivated land,
they regard country carts without suspicion. The hood is then taken off and
the leopard springs forward at the game with extreme velocity, perhaps
exceeding that which any other quadruped possesses. The accounts given by
Jerdon say that for the moment its speed is greater than that of a race-horse.
It cannot maintain this for more than three or four hundred yards, however,
and if in that distance the animal has not seized its prey, it relinquishes the
pursuit and stalks about in a towering passion. The Pārdhis say that when it
misses the game the leopard is as sulky as a human being and sometimes
refuses food for a couple of days. If successful in the pursuit, it seizes the
antelope by the throat; the keeper then comes up, and cutting the animal’s
throat collects some of the blood in the wooden ladle with which the leopard
is always fed; this is offered to him, and dropping his hold he laps it up
eagerly, when the hood is cleverly slipped on again.

The conducting of the cheetah from its cage to the chase is by no means an
easy matter. The keeper leads him along, as he would a large dog, with a
chain; and for a time as they scamper over the country the leopard goes
willingly enough; but if anything arrests his attention, some noise from the
forest, some scented trail upon the ground, he moves more slowly, throws
his head aloft and peers savagely round. A few more minutes perhaps and he
would be unmanageable. The keeper, however, is prepared for the
emergency. He holds in his left hand a cocoanut shell, sprinkled on the inside
with salt; and by means of a handle affixed to the shell he puts it at once
over the nose of the cheetah. The animal licks the salt, loses the scent,

Page 456

forgets the object which arrested his attention, and is led quietly along
again.8

9. Decoy stags

For hunting stags, tame stags were formerly used as decoys according to the
method described as follows: “We had about a dozen trained stags, all males,
with us. These, well acquainted with the object for which they were sent
forward, advanced at a gentle trot over the open ground towards the skirt of
the wood. They were observed at once by the watchers of the herd, and the
boldest of the wild animals advanced to meet them. Whether the intention
was to welcome them peacefully or to do battle for their pasturage I cannot
tell; but in a few minutes the two parties were engaged in a furious contest.
Head to head, antlers to antlers, the tame deer and the wild fought with great
fury. Each of the tame animals, every one of them large and formidable, was
closely engaged in contest with a wild adversary, standing chiefly on the
defensive, not in any feigned battle or mimicry of war but in a hard-fought
combat. We now made our appearance in the open ground on horseback,
advancing towards the scene of conflict. The deer on the skirts of the wood,
seeing us, took to flight; but those actually engaged maintained their ground
and continued the contest. In the meantime a party of native huntsmen, sent
for the purpose, gradually drew near to the wild stags, getting in between
them and the forest. What their object was we were not at the time aware; in
truth it was not one that we could have approved or encouraged. They made
their way into the rear of the wild stags, which were still combating too
fiercely to mind them; they approached the animals, and with a skilful cut of
their long knives the poor warriors fell hamstrung. We felt pity for the noble
animals as we saw them fall helplessly on the ground, unable longer to
continue the contest and pushed down of course by the decoy-stags. Once
down, they were unable to rise again.”9

Page 457

10. Hawks

Hawks were also used in a very ingenious fashion to prevent duck from
flying away when put upon water: “The trained hawks were now brought
into requisition, and marvellous it was to see the instinct with which they
seconded the efforts of their trainers. The ordinary hawking of the heron we
had at a later period of this expedition; but the use now made of the animal
was altogether different, and displayed infinitely more sagacity than one
would suppose likely to be possessed by such an animal. These were trained
especially for the purpose for which they were now employed. A flight of
ducks—thousands of birds—were enticed upon the water as before by
scattering corn over it. The hawks were then let fly, four or five of them. We
made our appearance openly upon the bank, guns in hand, and the living
swarm of birds rose at once into the air. The hawks circled above them,
however, in a rapid revolving flight and they dared not ascend high. Thus
was our prey retained fluttering in mid-air, until hundreds had paid the
penalty with their lives. Only picture in your mind’s eye the circling hawks
above gyrating monotonously, the fluttering captives in mid-air, darting now
here, now there to escape, and still coward-like huddling together; and the
motley group of sportsmen on the bank and you have the whole scene before
you at once.”10

11. Crocodile fishing

For catching crocodile, a method by which as already stated one group of the
Pārdhis earn their livelihood, a large double hook is used, baited with a piece
of putrid deer’s flesh and attached to a hempen rope 70 or 80 feet long.
When the crocodile has swallowed the hook, twenty or thirty persons drag

Page 458

the animal out of the water and it is despatched with axes. Crocodiles are
hunted only in the months of Pūs (December), Māgh (January) and Chait
(March), when they are generally fat and yield plenty of oil. The flesh is cut
into pieces and stewed over a slow fire, when it exudes a watery oil. This is
strained and sold in bottles at a rupee a seer (2 lbs.). It is used as an
embrocation for rheumatism and for neck galls of cattle. The Pārdhis do not
eat crocodile’s flesh.

12. Other occupations and criminal practices

A body of Pārdhis are sometimes employed by all the cultivators of a village
jointly for the purpose of watching the spring crops during the day and
keeping black-buck out of them. They do this perhaps for two or three
months and receive a fixed quantity of grain. The Tākankars are regularly
employed as village servants in Berār and travel about roughening the stones
of the household grinding-mills when their surfaces have worn smooth. For
this they receive an annual contribution of grain from each household. The
caste generally have criminal tendencies and Mr. Sewell states, that “The
Langoti Pārdhis and Tākankars are the worst offenders. Ordinarily when
committing dacoity they are armed with sticks and stones only. In digging
through a wall they generally leave a thin strip at which the leader carefully
listens before finally bursting through. Then when the hole has been made
large enough, he strikes a match and holding it in front of him so that his
features are shielded has a good survey of the room before entering.... As a
rule, they do not divide the property on or near the scene of the crime, but
take it home. Generally it is carried by one of the gang well behind the rest
so as to enable it to be hidden if the party is challenged.” In Bombay they
openly rob the standing crops, and the landlords stand in such awe of them
that they secure their goodwill by submitting to a regular system of
blackmail.11

Page 459

1 This article is partly compiled from papers by Mr. Adurām Chaudhri and Pandit Pyāre Lāl Misra
of the Gazetteer Office, and extracts from Mr. Kitts’ Berār Census Report (1881), and Mr.
Sewell’s note on the caste quoted in Mr. Gayer’s Lectures on the Criminal Tribes of the Central
Provinces.

2 Lectures on Criminal Tribes of the C.P., p. 19.
3 Berār Census Report (1881), p. 135.

4 Bombay Ethnographic Survey, art. Pārdhi.
5 Jungle Life in India, pp. 586–587.
6 Peasant Life in Bihār, p. 80.
7 See Jerdon’s Mammals of India, p, 97. The account there given is quoted in the Chhindwāra
District Gazetteer, pp. 16–17.

8 Private Life of an Eastern King, p. 75.
9 Private Life of an Eastern King, pp. 69, 71.

10 Private Life of an Eastern King, pp. 39–40.
11 Bombay Ethnographic Survey, ibidem.

Page 460

Parja
List of Paragraphs

1. General notice of the tribe
2. Exogamous septs
3. Kinship and marriage
4. Marriage dance
5. Nuptial ceremony
6. Widow-marriage and divorce
7. Religion and festivals
8. Disposal of the dead
9. Occupation and social customs

1. General notice of the tribe

Parja.—A small tribe,1 originally an offshoot of the Gonds, who reside in
the centre and east of the Bastar State and the adjoining Jaipur zamīndāri of
Madras. They number about 13,000 persons in the Central Provinces and
92,000 in Madras, where they are also known as Poroja. The name Parja
appears to be derived from the Sanskrit Parja, a subject. The following
notice of it is taken from the Madras Census Report2 of 1871: “The term
Parja is, as Mr. Carmichael has pointed out, merely a corruption of a Sanskrit
term signifying a subject; and it is understood as such by the people
themselves, who use it in contradistinction to a free hillman. Formerly, says
a tradition that runs through the whole tribe, Rājas and Parjas were brothers,
but the Rājas took to riding horses or, as the Barenja Parjas put it, sitting
still, and we became carriers of burdens and Parjas. It is quite certain in fact
that the term Parja is not a tribal denomination, but a class denomination;

Page 461

and it may be fitly rendered by the familiar epithet of ryot. There is no
doubt, however, that by far the greater number of these Parjas are akin to the
Khonds of the Ganjam Maliāhs. They are thrifty, hardworking cultivators,
undisturbed by the intestinal broils which their cousins in the north engage
in, and they bear in their breasts an inalienable reverence for their soil, the
value of which they are rapidly becoming acquainted with. Their ancient
rights to these lands are acknowledged by colonists from among the Aryans,
and when a dispute arises about the boundaries of a field possessed by recent
arrivals a Parja is usually called in to point out the ancient landmarks.
Gadbas are also represented as indigenous from the long lapse of years that
they have been in the country, but they are by no means of the patriarchal
type that characterises the Parjas.”

In Bastar the caste are also known as Dhurwa, which may be derived from
Dhur, the name applied to the body of Gonds as opposed to the Rāj-Gonds.
In Bastar, Dhurwa now conveys the sense of a headman of a village. The
tribe have three divisions, Thakara or Tagara, Peng and Mudara, of which
only the first is found in Bastar. Thakara appears to be a corruption of
Thākur, a lord, and the two names point to the conclusion that the Parjas
were formerly dominant in this tract. They themselves have a story,
somewhat resembling the one quoted above from Madras, to the effect that
their ancestor was the elder brother of the first Rāja of Bastar when he lived
in Madras, to the south of Warangal. From there he had to flee on account of
an invasion of the Muhammadans, and was accompanied by the goddess
Dānteshwari, the tutelary deity of the Rājas of Bastar. In accordance with the
command of the goddess the younger brother was considered as the Rāja and
rode on a horse, while the elder went before him carrying their baggage. At
Bhadrachallam they met the Bhatras, and further on the Halbas. The goddess
followed them, guiding their steps, but she strictly enjoined on the Rāja not
to look behind him so as to see her. But when they came to the sands of the
rivers Sankani and Dankani, the tinkle of the anklets of the goddess could
not be heard for the sand. The Rāja therefore looked behind him to see if she
was following, on which she said that she could go no more with him, but he
was to march as far as he could and then settle down. The two brothers
settled in Bastar, where the descendants of the younger became the ruling
clan, and those of the elder were their servants, the Parjas. The story

Page 462

indicates, perhaps, that the Parjas were the original Gond inhabitants and
rulers of the country, and were supplanted by a later immigration of the same
tribe, who reduced them to subjection, and became Rāj-Gonds. Possibly the
first transfer of power was effected by the marriage of an immigrant into a
Parja Rāja’s family, as so often happened with these old dynasties. The
Parjas still talk about the Rāni of Bastar as their Bohu or ‘younger brother’s
wife,’ and the custom is probably based on some such legend. The Madras
account of them as the arbiters of boundary disputes points to the same
conclusion, as this function is invariably assigned to the oldest residents in
any locality. The Parjas appear to be Gonds and not Khonds. Their sept
names are Gondi words, and their language is a form of Gondi, called after
them Parji. Parji has hitherto been considered a form of Bhatri, but Sir G.
Grierson3 has now classified the latter as a dialect of the Uriya language,
while Parji remains ‘A local and very corrupt variation of Gondi,
considerably mixed with Hindi forms.’ While then the Parjas, in Bastar at
any rate, must be held to be a branch of the Gonds, they may have a
considerable admixture of the Khonds, or other tribes in different localities,
as the rules of marriage are very loose in this part of the country.4

2. Exogamous septs

The tribe have exogamous totemistic septs, as Bāgh a tiger, Kachhim a
tortoise, Bokda a goat, Netām a dog, Gohi a big lizard, Pandki a dove and so
on. If a man kills accidentally the animal after which his sept is named, the
earthen cooking-pots of his household are thrown away, the clothes are
washed, and the house is purified with water in which the bark of the mango
or jāmun5 tree has been steeped. This is in sign of mourning, as it is thought
that such an act will bring misfortune. If a man of the snake sept kills a
snake accidentally, he places a piece of new yarn on his head, praying for
forgiveness, and deposits the body on an anthill, where snakes are supposed
to live. If a man of the goat sept eats goat’s flesh, it is thought that he will
become blind at once. A Parja will not touch the body of his totem-animal
when dead, and if he sees any one killing or teasing it when alive, he will go

Page 463

away out of sight. It is said that a man of the Kachhim sept once found a
tortoise while on a journey, and leaving it undisturbed, passed on. When the
tortoise died it was reborn in the man’s belly and troubled him greatly, and
since then every Parja is liable to be afflicted in the same way in the side of
the abdomen, the disease which is produced being in fact enlarged spleen.
The tortoise told the man that as he had left it lying by the road, and had not
devoted it to any useful purpose, he was afflicted in this way. Consequently,
when a man of the Kachhim sept finds a tortoise nowadays, he gives it to
somebody else who can cut it up. The story is interesting as a legend of the
origin of spleen, but has apparently been invented as an excuse for killing
the sacred animal.

3. Kinship and marriage

Marriage is prohibited in theory between members of the same sept. But as
the number of septs is rather small, the rule is not adhered to, and members
of the same sept are permitted to marry so long as they do not come from the
same village; the original rule of exogamy being perhaps thus exemplified.
The proposal for a match is made by the boy’s father, who first offers a cup
of liquor to the girl’s father in the bazār, and subsequently explains his
errand. If the girl’s father, after consulting with his family, disapproves of the
match, he returns an equal quantity of liquor to the boy’s father in token of
his decision. The girl is usually consulted, and asked if she would like to
marry her suitor, but not much regard is had to her opinion. If she dislikes
him, however, she usually runs away from him after a short interlude of
married life. If a girl becomes pregnant with a caste-fellow before marriage,
he is required to take her, and give to the family the presents which he would
make to them on a regular marriage. The man can subsequently be properly
married to some other woman, but the girl cannot be married at all. If a girl
is seduced by a man outside the caste, she is made over to him. It is essential
for a man to be properly married at least once, and an old bachelor will
sometimes go through the form of being wedded to his maternal uncle’s
daughter, even though she may be an infant. If no proposal for marriage is

Page 464

made for a girl, she is sometimes handed over informally to any man who
likes to take her, and who is willing to give as much for her as the parents
would receive for a regular marriage. A short time before the wedding, the
boy’s father sends a considerable quantity of rice to the girl’s father, and on
the day before he sends a calf, a pot of liquor, fifteen annas worth of copper
coin, and a new cloth. The bridegroom’s expenses are about Rs. 50, and the
bride’s about Rs. 10.

4. Marriage dance

At weddings the tribe have a dance called Surcha, for which the men wear a
particular dress consisting of a long coat, a turban and two or three scarves
thrown loosely over the shoulders. Strings of little bells are tied about the
feet, and garlands of beads round the neck; sometimes men and women
dance separately, and sometimes both sexes together in a long line or a
circle. Music is provided by bamboo flutes, drums and an iron instrument
something like a flute. As they dance, songs are sung in the form of question
and answer between the lines of men and women, usually of a somewhat
indecent character. The following short specimen may be given:—

Man. If you are willing to go with me we will both follow the officer’s elephant. If I go back
without you my heart can have no rest.

Woman. Who dare take me away from my husband while the Company is reigning. My
husband will beat me and who will pay him the compensation?

Man. You had better make up your mind to go with me. I will ask the Treasurer for some
money and pay it to your husband as compensation.

Woman. Very well, I will make ready some food, and will run away with you in the next
bright fortnight.

These dialogues often, it is said, lead to quarrels between husband and wife,
as the husband cannot rebuke his wife in the assembly. Sometimes the
women fall in love with men in the dance, and afterwards run away with
them.

Page 465

5. Nuptial ceremony

The marriage takes place at the boy’s house, where two marriage-sheds are
made. It is noticeable that the bride on going to the bridegroom’s house to be
married is accompanied only by her female relatives, no man of her family
being allowed to be with her. This is probably a reminiscence of the old
custom of marriage by capture, as in former times she was carried off by
force, the opposition of her male relatives having been quelled. In memory
of this the men still do not countenance the wedding procession by their
presence. The bridal couple are made to sit down together on a mat, and
from three to seven pots of cold water are poured over them. About a week
after the wedding the couple go to a market with their friends, and after
walking round it they all sit down and drink liquor.

6. Widow-marriage and divorce

The remarriage of widows is permitted, and a widow is practically
compelled to marry her late husband’s younger brother, if he has one. If she
persistently refuses to do so, in spite of the strongest pressure, her parents
turn her out of their house. In order to be married the woman goes to the
man’s house with some friends; they sit together on the ground, and the
friends apply the tīka or sign by touching their foreheads with dry rice. A
man can divorce his wife if she is of bad character, or if she is supposed to
be under an unfavourable star, or if her children die in infancy. A divorced
woman can marry again as if she were a widow.

Page 466

7. Religion and festivals

The Parjas worship the class of divinities of the hills and forests usually
revered among primitive tribes, as well as Dānteshwari, the tutelary goddess
of Bastar. On the day that sowing begins they offer a fowl to the field, first
placing some grains of rice before it. If the fowl eats the rice they
prognosticate a good harvest, and if not the reverse. A few members of the
tribe belong to the Rāmānandi sect, and on this account a little extra
attention is paid to them. If such a one is invited to a feast he is given a
wooden seat, while others sit on the ground. It is said that a few years ago a
man became a Kabīrpanthi, but he subsequently went blind and his son died,
and since this event the sect is absolutely without adherents. Most villages
have a Sirha or man who is possessed by the deity, and his advice is taken in
religious matters, such as the detection of witches. Another official is called
Medha Gantia or ‘The Counter of posts.’ He appoints the days for weddings,
calculating them by counting on his fingers, and also fixes auspicious days
for the construction of a house or for the commencement of sowing. It is
probable that in former times he kept count of the days by numbering posts
or trees. When rain is wanted the people fix a piece of wood into the ground,
calling it Bhīmsen Deo or King of the Clouds. They pour water over it and
pray to it, asking for rain. Every year, after the crops are harvested, they
worship the rivers or streams in the village. A snake, a jackal, a hare and a
dog wagging its ears are unlucky objects to see when starting on a journey,
and also a dust devil blowing along in front. They do not kill wild dogs,
because they say that tigers avoid the forests where these reside, and some of
them hold that a tiger on meeting a wild dog climbs a tree to get out of his
way. Wednesday and Thursday are lucky days for starting on a journey, and
the operations of sowing, reaping and threshing should be commenced and
completed on one of these days. When a man intends to build a house he
places a number of sets of three grains of rice, one resting on the other two,
on the ground in different places. Each set is covered by a leaf-cup with
some earth to hold it down. Next morning the grains are inspected, and if the

Page 467

top one has fallen down the site is considered to be lucky, as indicating that
the earth is wishful to bear the burden of a house in this place. A house
should face to the east or west, and not to the north or south. Similarly, the
roads leading out of the village should run east or west from the starting-
point. The principal festivals of the Parjas are the Hareli6 or feast of the new
vegetation in July, the Nawākhāni7 or feast of the new rice crop in August or
September, and the Am Nawākhāni or that of the new mango crop in April or
May. At the feasts the new season’s crop should be eaten, but if no fresh rice
has ripened, they touch some of the old grain with a blade of a growing rice-
plant, and consider that it has become the new crop. On these occasions
ancestors are worshipped by members of the family only inside the house,
and offerings of the new crops are made to them.

8. Disposal of the dead

The dead are invariably buried, the corpse being laid in the ground with head
to the east and feet to the west. This is probably the most primitive burial, it
being supposed that the region of the dead is towards the west, as the setting
sun disappears in that direction. The corpse is therefore laid in the grave with
the feet to the west ready to start on its journey. Members of the tribe who
have imbibed Hindu ideas now occasionally lay the corpse with the head to
the north in the direction of the Ganges. Rice-gruel, water and a tooth-stick
are placed on the grave nightly for some days after death. As an interesting
parallel instance, near home, of the belief that the soul starts on a long
journey after death, the following passage may be quoted from Mr.
Gomme’s Folklore: “Among the superstitions of Lancashire is one which
tells us of a lingering belief in a long journey after death, when food is
necessary to support the soul. A man having died of apoplexy at a public
dinner near Manchester, one of the company was heard to remark, ‘Well,
poor Joe, God rest his soul! He has at least gone to his long rest wi’ a belly
full o’ good meat, and that’s some consolation!’ And perhaps a still more
remarkable instance is that of the woman buried in Curton Church, near
Rochester, who directed by her will that the coffin was to have a lock and

Page 468

key, the key being placed in her dead hand, so that she might be able to
release herself at pleasure.”8

After the burial a dead fish is brought on a leaf-plate to the mourners, who
touch it, and are partly purified. The meaning of this rite, if there be any, is
not known. After the period of mourning, which varies from three to nine
days, is over, the mourners and their relatives must attend the next weekly
bazār, and there offer liquor and sweets in the name of the dead man, who
upon this becomes ranked among the ancestors.

9. Occupation and social customs

The Parjas are cultivators, and grow rice and other crops in the ordinary
manner. Many of them are village headmen, and to these the term Dhurwa is
more particularly applied. The tribe will eat fowls, pig, monkeys, the large
lizard, field-rats, and bison and wild buffalo, but they do not eat carnivorous
animals, crocodiles, snakes or jackals. Some of them eat beef while others
have abjured it, and they will not accept the leavings of others. They are not
considered to be an impure caste. If any man or woman belonging to a
higher caste has a liaison with a Parja, and is on that account expelled from
their own caste, he or she can be admitted as a Parja. In their other customs
and dress and ornaments the tribe resemble the Gonds of Bastar. Women are
tattooed on the chest and arms with patterns of dots. The young men
sometimes wear their hair long, and tie it in a bunch behind, secured by a
strip of cloth.

1 This article is based on papers by Mr. Panda Baijnāth and other officers of the Bastar State.
2 By Dr. Cornish.

3 Linguistic Survey; vol. ix, p. 554; vol. ii. part ii. pp. 434 ff.
4 In the article on Gond it is suggested that the Gonds and Khonds were originally one tribe, and
the fact that the Parjas have affinities with both of them appears to support this view.

Page 469

5 Eugenia jambolana.

6 Hareli, lit. ‘the season of greenness.’
7 Nawākhāni, lit. ‘the new eating.’

8 Folklore as a Historical Science (G.L. Gomme), pp. 191, 192.

Page 470

Pāsi
List of Paragraphs

1. The nature and origin of the caste
2. Brāhmanical legends
3. Its mixed composition
4. Marriage and other customs
5. Religion, superstitions and social customs
6. Occupation
7. Criminal tendencies

1. The nature and origin of the caste

Pāsi, Passi.1—A Dravidian occupational caste of northern India, whose
hereditary employment is the tapping of the palmyra, date and other palm
trees for their sap. The name is derived from the Sanskrit pāshika, ‘One who
uses a noose,’ and the Hindi, pās or pāsa, a noose. It is a curious fact that
when the first immigrant Parsis from Persia landed in Gujarāt they took to
the occupation of tapping palm trees, and the poorer of them still follow it.
The resemblance in the name, however, can presumably be nothing more
than a coincidence. The total strength of the Pāsis in India is about a million
and a half persons, nearly all of whom belong to the United Provinces and
Bihār. In the Central Provinces they number 3500, and reside principally in
the Jubbulpore and Hoshangābād Districts. The caste is now largely
occupational, and is connected with the Bhars, Arakhs, Khatīks and other
Dravidian groups of low status. But in the past they seem to have been of
some importance in Oudh. “All through Oudh,” Mr. Crooke states, “they
have traditions that they were lords of the country, and that their kings

Page 471

reigned in the Districts of Kheri, Hardoi and Unao. Rāmkot, where the town
of Bāngarmau in Unao now stands, is said to have been one of their chief
strongholds. The last of the Pāsi lords of Rāmkot, Rāja Santhar, threw off his
allegiance to Kanauj and refused to pay tribute. On this Rāja Jaichand gave
his country to the Banāphar heroes Alha and Udal, and they attacked and
destroyed Rāmkot, leaving it the shapeless mass of ruins which it now is.”
Similar traditions prevail in other parts of Oudh. It is also recorded that the
Rājpāsis, the highest division of the caste, claim descent from Tilokchand,
the eponymous hero of the Bais Rājpūts. It would appear then that the Pāsis
were a Dravidian tribe who held a part of Oudh before it was conquered by
the Rājpūts. As the designation of Pāsi is an occupational term and is derived
from the Sanskrit, it would seem that the tribe must formerly have had some
other name, or they may be an occupational offshoot of the Bhars. In favour
of this suggestion it may be noted that the Bhars also have strong traditions
of their former dominance in Oudh. Thus Sir C. Elliott states in his
Chronicles of Unao2 that after the close of the heroic age, when Ajodhya was
held by the Sūrajvansi Rājpūts under the great Rāma, we find after an
interval of historic darkness that Ajodhya has been destroyed, the
Sūrajvansis utterly banished, and a large extent of country is being ruled
over by aborigines called Cheros in the far east, Bhars in the centre and
Rājpāsis in the west. Again, in Kheri the Pāsis always claim kindred with the
Bhars,3 and in Mīrzāpur4 the local Pāsis represent the Bhars as merely a
subcaste of their own tribe, though this is denied by the Bhars themselves. It
seems therefore a not improbable hypothesis that the Pāsis and perhaps also
the kindred tribe of Arakhs are functional groups formed from the Bhar tribe.
For a discussion of the early history of this important tribe the reader must
be referred to Mr. Crooke’s excellent article.

2. Brāhmanical legends

The following tradition is related by the Pāsis themselves in Mīrzāpur and
the Central Provinces: One day a man was going to kill a number of cows.
Parasurāma was at that time practising austerities in the jungles. Hearing the

Page 472

cries of the sacred animals he rushed to their assistance, but the cow-killer
was aided by his friends. So Parasurāma made five men out of kusha grass
and brought them to life by letting drops of his perspiration fall upon them.
Hence arose the name Pāsi, from the Hindi pasīna, sweat. The men thus
created rescued the cows. Then they returned to Parasurāma and asked him
to provide them with a wife. Just at that moment a Kāyasth girl was passing
by, and her Parasurāma seized and made over to the Pāsis. From them sprang
the Kaithwās subcaste. Another legend related by Mr. Crooke tells that
during the time Parasurāma was incarnate there was an austere devotee
called Kuphal who was asked by Brahma to demand of him a boon,
whereupon he requested that he might be perfected in the art of thieving. His
request was granted, and there is a well-known verse regarding the devotions
of Kuphal, the pith of which is that the mention of the name of Kuphal, who
received a boon from Brahma, removes all fear of thieves; and the mention
of his three wives—Māya (illusion), Nidra (sleep), and Mohani
(enchantment)—deprives thieves of success in their attempts against the
property of those who repeat these names. Kuphal is apparently the
progenitor of the caste, and the legend is intended to show how the position
of the Pāsis in the Hindu cosmos or order of society according to the caste
system has been divinely ordained and sanctioned, even to the recognition of
theft as their hereditary pursuit.

3. Its mixed composition

Whatever their origin may have been the composition of the caste is now of
a very mixed nature. Several names of other castes, as Gūjar, Guāl or Ahīr,
Arakh, Khatīk, Bahelia, Bhīl and Bania, are returned as divisions of the Pāsis
in the United Provinces. Like all migratory castes they are split into a
number of small groups, whose constitution is probably not very definite.
The principal subcastes in the Central Provinces are the Rājpāsis or highest
class, who probably were at one time landowners; the Kaithwās or
Kaithmās, supposed to be descended from a Kāyasth, as already related; the
Tirsulia, who take their name from the trisūla or three-bladed knife used to

Page 473

pierce the stem of the palm tree; the Bahelia or hunters, and Chiriyamār or
fowlers; the Ghudchadha or those who ride on ponies, these being probably
saises or horse-keepers; the Khatīk or butchers and Gūjar or graziers; and the
Māngta or beggars, these being the bards and genealogists of the caste, who
beg from their clients and take food from their hands; they are looked down
on by the other Pāsis.

4. Marriage and other customs

In the Central Provinces the tribe have now no exogamous groups; they
avoid marriage with blood relations as far back as their memory carries
them. At their weddings the couple walk round the srāwan or heavy log of
wood, which is dragged over the fields before sowing to break up the larger
clods of earth. In the absence of this an ordinary plough or harrow will serve
as a substitute, though why the Pāsis should impart a distinctively
agricultural implement into their marriage ceremony is not clear. Like the
Gonds, the Pāsis celebrate their weddings at the bridegroom’s house and not
at the bride’s. Before the wedding the bridegroom’s mother goes and sits
over a well, taking with her seven urad cakes5 and stalks of the plant. The
bridegroom walks seven times round the well, and at each turn the parapet is
marked with red and white clay and his mother throws one of the cakes and
stalks into the well. Finally, the mother threatens to throw herself into the
well, and the bridegroom begs her not to do so, promising that he will serve
and support her. Divorce and the remarriage of widows are freely permitted.
Conjugal morality is somewhat lax, and Mr. Crooke quotes a report from
Pertābgarh to the effect that if a woman of a tribe become pregnant by a
stranger and the child be born in the house of her father or husband, it will
be accepted as a Pāsi of pure blood and admitted to all tribal privileges. The
bodies of adults may be buried or burnt as convenient, but those of children
or of persons dying from smallpox, cholera or snake-bite are always buried.
Mourning is observed during ten days for a man and nine days for a woman,
while children who die unmarried are not mourned at all.

Page 474

5. Religion, superstitions and social customs

The Pāsis worship all the ordinary Hindu deities. All classes of Brāhmans
will officiate at their marriages and other ceremonies, and do anything for
them which does not involve touching them or any article in their houses. In
Bengal, Sir H. Risley writes, the employment of Brāhmans for the
performance of ceremonies appears to be a very recent reform for, as a rule,
in sacrifices and funeral ceremonies, the worshipper’s sister’s son performs
the functions of a priest. “Among the Pāsis of Monghyr this ancient custom,
which admits of being plausibly interpreted as a survival of female kinship,
still prevails generally.” The social status of the Pāsis is low, but they are not
regarded as impure. At their marriage festivals, Mr. Gayer notes, boys are
dressed up as girls and made to dance in public, but they do not use drums or
other musical instruments. They breed pigs and cure the bacon obtained
from them. Marriage questions are decided by the tribal council, which is
presided over by a chairman (Chaudhri) selected at each meeting from
among the most influential adult males present. The council deals especially
with cases of immorality and pollution caused by journeys across the black
water (kāla pāni) which the criminal pursuits of the tribe occasionally
necessitate.

6. Occupation

The traditional occupation of the Pāsis, as already stated, is the extraction of
the sap of palm trees. But some of them are hunters and fowlers like the
Pārdhis, and like them also they make and mend grindstones, while others
are agriculturists; and the caste has also strong criminal propensities, and
includes a number of professional thieves. Some are employed in the Nāgpur

Page 475

mills and others have taken small building contracts. Pāsis are generally
illiterate and in poor circumstances, and are much addicted to drink. In
climbing6 palm trees to tap them for their juice the worker uses a heel-rope,
by which his feet are tied closely together. At the same time he has a stout
rope passing round the tree and his body. He leans back against this rope and
presses the soles of his feet, thus tied together, against the tree. He then
climbs up the tree by a series of hitches or jerks of his back and feet
alternately. The juice of the palmyra palm (tār) and the date palm (khajūr) is
extracted by the Pāsi. The tār trees, Sir H. Risley states,7 are tapped from
March to May, and the date palm in the cold season. The juice of the former,
known as tāri or toddy, is used in the manufacture of bread, and an
intoxicating liquor is obtained from it by adding sugar and grains of rice.
Hindustāni drunkards often mix dhatūra with the toddy to increase its
intoxicating properties. The quantity of juice extracted from one tree varies
from five to ten pounds. Date palm tāri is less commonly drunk, being
popularly believed to cause rheumatism, but is extensively used in preparing
sugar.

7. Criminal tendencies

Eighty years ago, when General Sleeman wrote, the Pāsis were noted
thieves. In his Journey through Oudh8 he states that in Oudh there were then
supposed to be one hundred thousand families of Pāsis, who were skilful
thieves and robbers by profession, and were formerly Thugs and poisoners
as well. They generally formed the worst part of the gangs maintained by
refractory landowners, “who keep Pāsis to fight for them, as they pay
themselves out of the plunder and cost little to their employers. They are all
armed with bows and are very formidable at night. They and their refractory
employés keep the country in a perpetual state of disorder.” Mr. Gayer notes9
that the criminally disposed members of the caste take contracts for the
watch and sale of mangoes in groves distant from habitations, so that their
movements will not be seen by prying eyes. They also seek employment as
roof-thatchers, in which capacity they are enabled to ascertain which houses

Page 476

contain articles worth stealing. They show considerable cunning in disposing
of their stolen property. The men will go openly in the daytime to the
receiver and acquaint him with the fact that they have property to dispose of;
the receiver goes to the bazār, and the women come to him with grass for
sale. They sell the grass to the receiver, and then accompany him home with
it and the stolen property, which is artfully concealed in it.

1 Based principally on Mr. Crooke’s article on the caste in his Tribes and Castes of the North-
Western Provinces and Oudh.

2 Quoted in Mr. Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, art. Bhar.
3 Art. Pāsi, para. 3.

4 Art. Bhar, para. 4.
5 A pulse of a black colour (Phaseolus radiatus).

6 These sentences are taken from Dr. Grierson’s Peasant Life in Behār, p. 79.
7 Tribes and Castes of Bengal, art. Pāsi.

8 The following passage is taken from Mr. Crooke’s article on Pāsi, and includes quotations from
the Sitāpur and Hardoi Settlement Reports.
9 Lectures on Criminal Tribes of the Central Provinces.

Page 477

Patwa
Patwa, Patwi, Patra, Ilākelband.—The occupational caste of weavers of
fancy silk braid and thread. In 1911 the Patwas numbered nearly 6000
persons in the Central Provinces, being returned principally from the
Narsinghpur, Raipur, Saugor, Jubbulpore and Hoshangābād Districts. About
800 were resident in Berār. The name is derived from the Sanskrit pata,
woven cloth, or Hindi pāt, silk. The principal subcastes of the Patwas are the
Naraina; the Kanaujia, also known as Chhipi, because they sew marriage
robes; the Deobansi or ‘descendants of a god,’ who sell lac and glass
bangles; the Lakhera, who prepare lac bangles; the Kachera, who make glass
bangles; and others. Three of the above groups are thus functional in
character. They have also Rājpūt and Kāyastha subcastes, who may consist
of refugees from those castes received into the Patwa community. In the
Central Provinces the Patwas and Lakheras are in many localities considered
to be the same caste, as they both deal in lac and sell articles made of it; and
the account of the occupations of the Lakhera caste also applies largely to
the Patwas. The exogamous groups of the caste are named after villages, or
titles or nicknames borne by the reputed founder of the group. They indicate
that the Patwas of the Central Provinces are generally descended from
immigrants from northern India. The Patwa usually purchases silk and
colours it himself. He makes silk strings for pyjamas and coats, armlets and
other articles. Among these are the silk threads called rākhis, used on the
Rakshābandhan festival,1 when the Brāhmans go round in the morning tying
them on to the wrists of all Hindus as a protection against evil spirits. For
this the Brāhman receives a present of one or two pice. The rākhi is made of
pieces of raw silk fibre twisted together, with a knot at one end and a loop at
the other. It goes round the wrist, and the knot is passed through the loop.
Sisters also tie it round their brothers’ wrists and are given a present. The
Patwas make the phundri threads for tying up the hair of women, whether of
silk or cotton, and various threads used as amulets, such as the janjīra, worn
by men round the neck, and the ganda or wizard’s thread, which is tied
round the arm after incantations have been said over it; and the necklets of

Page 478

silk or cotton thread bound with thin silver wire which the Hindus wear at
Anant Chaudas, a sort of All Saints’ Day, when all the gods are worshipped.
In this various knots are made by the Brāhmans, and in each a number of
deities are tied up to exert their beneficent influence for the wearer of the
thread. These are the bands which Hindus commonly wear on their necks.
The Patwas thread necklaces of gold and jewels on silk thread, and also
make the strings of cowries, slung on pack-thread, which are tied round the
necks of bullocks when they race on the Pola day, and on ponies, probably as
a charm. After a child is born in the family of one of their clients, the Patwas
make tassels of cotton and hemp thread coloured red, green and yellow, and
hang them to the centre-beam of the house and the top of the child’s cradle,
and for this they get a present, which from a rich man may be as much as ten
rupees. The sacred thread proper is usually made by Brāhmans in the Central
Provinces. Some of the Patwas wander about hawking their wares from
village to village. Besides the silk threads they sell the tiklis or large
spangles which women wear on their foreheads, lac bangles and balls of
henna, and the large necklaces of lac beads covered with tinsel of various
colours which are worn in Chhattīsgarh. A Patwa must not rear the tasar
silkworm nor boil the cocoons on pain of expulsion from caste.

1 The word Rakshābandhan is said to mean literally, ‘the bond of protection.’ Another suggested
derivation, ‘binding the devil,’ is perhaps incorrect.

Page 479

Pindāri
List of Paragraphs

1. Origin of the name
2. Rise of the Pindāris
3. Their strength and sphere of operations
4. Pindāri expeditions and methods
5. Return from an expedition
6. Suppression of the Pindāris. Death of Chitu
7. Character of the Pindāris
8. The existing Pindāris
9. Attractions of a Pindāri’s life

1. Origin of the name

Pindāri, Pindāra, Pendhāri.1—The well-known professional class of
freebooters, whose descendants now form a small cultivating caste. In the
Central Provinces they numbered about 150 persons in 1911, while there are
about 10,000 in India. They are mainly Muhammadans but include some
Hindus. The Pindāris of the Central Provinces are for the most part the
descendants of Gonds, Korkus and Bhīls whose children were carried off in
the course of raids, circumcised, and brought up to follow the profession of a
Pindāri. When the bands were dispersed many of them returned to their
native villages and settled down. Malcolm considered that the name Pindāri
was derived from pinda, an intoxicating drink, and was given to them on
account of their dissolute habits. He adds that Karīm Khān, a famous Pindāri
leader, had never heard of any other reason for the name, and Major Henley
had the etymology confirmed by the most intelligent of the Pindāris of

Page 480

whom he inquired.2 In support of this may be adduced the name of Bhangi,
given to the sweeper caste on account of their drinking bhang or hemp.
Wilson again held the most probable derivation to be from the Marāthi
pendha, in the sense of a bundle of rice-straw, and hara one who takes,
because the name was originally applied to horsemen who hung on to an
army and were employed in collecting forage. The fact that the existing
Pindāris are herdsmen and tenders of buffaloes and thus might well have
been employed for the collection of forage may be considered somewhat to
favour the above view; but the authors of Hobson-Jobson, after citing these
derivations, continue: “We cannot think any of the etymologies very
satisfactory. We venture another as a plausible suggestion merely. Both pind-
parna in Hindi and pindas-basnen in Marāthi signify ‘to follow,’ the latter
being defined as ‘to stick closely; to follow to the death; used of the
adherence of a disagreeable fellow.’ Such phrases could apply to these
hangers-on of an army in the field looking out for prey.” Mr. W. Irvine3 has
suggested that the word comes from a place or region called Pandhār, which
is referred to by native historians and seems to have been situated between
Burhānpur and Handia on the Nerbudda; and states that there is good
evidence to prove that a large number of Pindāris were settled in this part of
the country. Mr. D. Chisholm reports from Nimār that “Pandhār or Pāndhar
is the name given to a stream which rises in the Gularghāt hills of the Asīr
range and flows after a very circuitous course into the Masak river by
Mandeva. The name signifies five, as it is joined by four other small streams.
The Asīr hills were the haunts of the Pindāris, and the country about these,
especially by the banks of the Pandhār, is very wild; but it is not commonly
known that the Pindāris derived their name from this stream.” And as the
Pindāris are first heard of as hangers-on of the Marātha armies in the Deccan
prior to A.D. 1700, it seems unlikely also that their name can be taken from a
place in the Nimār District, where it is not recorded that they were settled
before 1794. Nor does the Pandhār itself seem sufficiently important to have
given a name to the whole body of freebooters. Malcolm’s or Wilson’s
derivations are perhaps on the whole the most probable. Prinsep writes:
“Pindāra seems to have the same reference to Pandour that Kuzāk has to
Cossack. The latter word is of Turkish origin but is commonly used to
express a mounted robber in Hindustān.” Though the Pandours were the
predatory light cavalry of the Austrian army, and had considerable

Page 481

resemblance to the Pindāris, it does not seem possible to suppose that there
is any connection between the two words. The Pendra zamīndāri in Bilāspur
is named after the Pindāris, the dense forests of the Rewah plateau which
includes Pendra having been one of their favourite asylums of refuge.

2. Rise of the Pindāris

The Pindāri bands appear to have come into existence during the wars of the
late Muhammadan dynasties in the Deccan, and in the latter part of the
seventeenth century they attached themselves to the Marāthas in their revolt
against Aurāngzeb. The first mention of the name occurs at this time. During
and after the Marātha wars many of the Pindāri leaders obtained grants in
Central India from Sindhia and Holkar, and were divided into two parties
owing a nominal allegiance to these princes and designated as the Sindhia
Shāhi and Holkar Shāhi. In the period of chaos which reigned at this time
outside British territories their raids in all directions attended by the most
savage atrocities became more and more intolerable. These outrages
extended from Bundelkhand to Cuddapah south of Madras and from Orissa
to Gujarāt.

When attached to the Marātha armies, Malcolm states, the Pindāris always
camped separately and were not permitted to plunder in the Marātha
territories; they were given an allowance averaging four annas each a day,
and further supported themselves by employing their small horses and
bullocks in carrying grain, forage and wood, for which articles the Pindāri
bazār was the great mart. When let loose to pillage, which was always the
case some days before the army entered an enemy’s country, all allowances
stopped; no restraint whatever was put upon these freebooters till the
campaign was over, when the Marātha commander, if he had the power,
generally seized the Pindāri chiefs or surrounded their camps and forced
them to yield up the greater part of their booty. A knowledge of this practice
led the Pindāris to redouble their excesses, that they might be able to satisfy
without ruin the expected rapacity of their employers.

Page 482

In 1794, Grant-Duff writes, Sindhia assigned some lands to the Pindāris near
the banks of the Nerbudda, which they soon extended by conquests from the
Grassias or original independent landholders in their neighbourhood. Their
principal leaders at that time were two brothers named Hiru and Burun, who
are said to have been put to death for their aggressions on the territory of
Sindhia and of Rāghuji Bhonsla. The sons of Hiru and Burun became
Pindāri chiefs; but Karīm Khān, a Pindāra who had acquired great booty at
the plunder of the Nizām’s troops after the battle of Hurdla, and was
distinguished by superior cunning and enterprise, was the principal leader of
this refuse of the Marātha armies. Karīm got the district of Shujahalpur from
Umar Khān which, with some additions, was afterwards confirmed to him
by Sindhia. During the war of 1803 and the subsequent disturbed state of the
country Karīm contrived to obtain possession of several districts in Mālwa
belonging to Sindhia’s jāgirdārs; and his land revenue at one time is said to
have amounted to fifteen lakhs of rupees a year. He also wrested some
territory from the Nawāb of Bhopāl on which he built a fort as a place of
security for his family and of deposit for his plunder. Karīm was originally a
Sindhia Shāhi, but like most of the Pindāris, except about 5000 of the Holkar
Shāhis who remained faithful, he changed sides or plundered his master
whenever it suited his convenience, which was as often as he found an
opportunity. Sindhia, jealous of his encroachments, on pretence of lending
him some gems inveigled him to an interview, made him prisoner, plundered
his camp, recovered the usurped districts and lodged Karīm in the fort of
Gwalior.

A number of leaders started up after the confinement of Karīm, of whom
Chitu, Dost Muhammad, Namdār Khān and Sheikh Dullah became the most
conspicuous. They associated themselves with Amīr Khān in 1809 during his
expedition to Berār; and in 1810, when Karīm Khān purchased his release
from Gwalior, they assembled under that leader a body of 25,000 horse and
some battalions of newly raised infantry with which they again proposed to
invade Berār; but Chitu, always jealous of Karīm’s ascendency, was
detached by Rāghuji Bhonsla from the alliance, and afterwards co-operated
with Sindhia in attacking him; Karīm was in consequence driven to seek an
asylum with his old patron Amīr Khān, but by the influence of Sindhia Amīr
Khān kept him in a state of confinement until 1816.

Page 483

When the Marāthas ceased to spread themselves over India, the Pindāris who
had attended their armies were obliged to plunder the territories of their
former protectors for subsistence. To the unemployed soldiery of India,
particularly to the Muhammadans, the life of a Pindāra had many
allurements; but the Marātha horsemen who possessed hereditary rights or
had any pretensions to respectability did not readily join them. One of the
above leaders, Sheikh Dullah or Abdullah, apparently became a dacoit after
the Pindāris had been dispersed, and he is still remembered in Hoshangābād
and Nimār in the following saying:

Niche zamīn aur upar Allah,
Aur bīch men phiren Sheikh Dullah,

or ‘God is above and the earth beneath, and Sheikh Dullah ranges at his will
between.’

3. Their strength and sphere of operations

In 1814, Prinsep states,4 the actual military force at the disposal of the
Pindāris amounted to 40,000 horse, inclusive of the Pathāns, who though
more orderly and better disciplined than the Pindāris of the Nerbudda,
possessed the same character and were similarly circumstanced in every
respect, supporting themselves entirely by depredations whenever they could
practise them. Their number would be doubled were we to add the remainder
of Holkar’s troops of the irregular kind, which were daily deserting the
service of a falling house in order to engage in the more profitable career of
predatory enterprise; and the loose cavalry establishments of Sindhia and the
Bhonsla, which were bound by no ties but those of present entertainment,
and were always in great arrears of pay. The presence of this force in the
centre of India and able to threaten each of the three Presidencies imposed
the most extensive annual precautions for defence, in spite of which the
territories of our allies were continually overrun. On two occasions, once

Page 484

when they entered Gujarāt in 1808–9 and again in 1812 when the Bengal
provinces of Mirzāpur and Shahābād were devastated, they penetrated into
our immediate territories. Grant-Duff records that in one raid on the coast
from Masulipatam northward they in ten days plundered 339 villages,
burning many, killing and wounding 682 persons, torturing 3600 and
carrying off or destroying property to the amount of two lakhs and a half.
Indeed their reputation was such that the mere rumour of an incursion caused
a regular panic at Madras in 1816, of which General Hislop gives an
amusing account:5 “In the middle of this year the troops composing the
garrison of Fort St. George were moved out and encamped on the island
outside Black Town wall. This imprudent step was taken, as was affirmed, to
be in readiness to meet the Pindāris, who were reported to be on their road to
Madras, although it was well known that not half a dozen of them were at
that time within 200 miles of the place. The native inhabitants of all classes
throughout Madras and its vicinity were in the utmost alarm, and looked for
places of retreat and security for their property. It brought on Madras all the
distresses in imagination of Hyder Ali’s invasion. It was about this period
that an idle rumour reached Madras of the arrival of the Pindāris at the
Mount; all was uproar, flight and despair to the walls of Madras. This alarm
originated in a few Dhobis and grass-cutters of the artillery having mounted
their tattus and, in mock imitation of the Pindāris, galloped about and played
with long bamboos in their hands in the vicinity of the Mount. The effect
was such, however, that many of the civil servants and inhabitants of the
Mount Road packed up and moved to the Fort for protection. Troopers,
messengers, etc., were seen galloping to the Government House and thence
to the different public authorities. Such was the alarm in the Government
House that on the afternoon of that day an old officer, anxious to offer some
advice to the Governor, rode smartly to the Government gardens, and on
reaching the entrance observed the younger son of the Governor running
with all possible speed into the house; who having got to a place of security
ventured to look back and then discovered in the old officer a face which he
had before seen; when turning back again he exclaimed, ‘Upon my word, sir,
I was so frightened I took you for a Pindāri.’”

Page 485

4. Pindāri expeditions and methods

A Pindāri expedition6 usually started at the close of the rains, as soon as the
rivers became fordable after the Dasahra festival in October. Their horses
were then shod, having previously been carefully trained to prepare them for
long marches and hard work. A leader of tried courage having been chosen
as Luhbaria, all who were so inclined set forth on a foray, or Luhbar as it
was called in the Pindāri nomenclature, the strength of the party often
amounting to several thousands. In every thousand Pindāris about 400 were
tolerably well mounted and armed; of this number about every fifteenth man
carried a matchlock, but their favourite weapon was the ordinary bamboo
spear of the Marāthas, from 12 to 18 feet long. Of the remaining 600 two-
thirds were usually common Lootais or plunderers, indifferently mounted
and armed with every variety of weapon; and the rest slaves, attendants and
camp-followers, mounted on tattus or wild ponies and keeping up with the
Luhbar in the best manner they could. They were encumbered neither by
tents nor baggage; each horseman carried a few cakes of bread for his own
subsistence and some feeds of grain for his horse. They advanced at the
rapid rate of forty or fifty miles a day, neither turning to the right nor to the
left till they arrived at their place of destination. They then divided, and
made a sweep of all the cattle and property they could find; committing at
the same time the most horrid atrocities and destroying what they could not
carry away. They trusted to the secrecy and suddenness of the irruption for
avoiding those who guarded the frontiers of the countries they invaded; and
before a force could be brought against them they were on their return. Their
chief strength lay in their being intangible. If pursued they made marches of
extraordinary length, sometimes upwards of sixty miles, by roads almost
impracticable for regular troops. If overtaken they dispersed and
reassembled at an appointed rendezvous; if followed to the country from
which they issued they broke into small parties. The cruelties they
perpetrated were beyond belief. As it was impossible for them to remain
more than a few hours on the same spot the utmost despatch was necessary

Page 486

in rifling any towns or villages into which they could force an entrance;
every one whose appearance indicated the probability of his possessing
money was immediately put to the most horrid torture till he either pointed
out his hoard or died under the infliction. Nothing was safe from the pursuit
of Pindāri lust or avarice; it was their common practice to burn and destroy
what they could not carry away; and in the wantonness of barbarity to ravish
and murder women and children under the eyes of their husbands and
parents. The ordinary modes of torture inflicted by these miscreants were to
apply red-hot irons to the soles of the feet; or to throw the victim on the
ground and place a plank or beam across his chest on which two men
pressed with their whole weight; and to throw oil on the clothes and set fire
to them, or tie wisps of rag soaked in oil to the ends of all the victim’s
fingers and set fire to these. Another favourite method was to put hot ashes
into a horse-bag, which they tied over a man’s mouth and nostrils and
thumped him on the back until he inhaled the ashes. The effect on the lungs
of the sufferer was such that few long survived the operation.

5. Return from an expedition

The return of the Pindāris from an expedition presented at one view their
character and habits. When they recrossed the Nerbudda and reached their
homes their camp became like a fair. After the claims of the chief of the
territory (whose right was a fourth part of the booty, but who generally
compounded for one or two valuable articles) had been satisfied, the usual
share paid to their Luhbaria, or chosen leader for the expedition, and all
debts to merchants and others who had made advances discharged, the
plunder of each man was exposed for sale; traders from every part came to
make cheap bargains; and while the women were busy in disposing of their
husbands’ property, the men, who were on such occasions certain of visits
from all their friends, were engaged in hearing music, seeing dancers and
drolls, and in drinking. This life of debauchery and excess lasted till their
money was gone; they were then compelled to look for new scenes of rapine,
or, if the season was favourable, were supported by their chiefs, or by loans

Page 487

at high interest from merchants who lived in their camps, many of whom
amassed large fortunes. This worst part of the late population of Central
India is, as a separate community, now extinct.7

6. Suppression of the Pindāris. Death of Chitu

The result of the Pindāri raids was that Central India was being rapidly
reduced to the condition of a desert, and the peasants, unable to support
themselves on the land, had no option but to join the robber bands or starve.
It was not until 1817 that Lord Hastings obtained authority from home to
take regular measures for their repression; and at the same time he also
forced or persuaded the principal chiefs of Central India to act vigorously in
concert with him. When these were put into operation and the principal
routes from Central India occupied by British detachments, the Pindāris
were completely broken up and scattered in the course of a single campaign.
They made no stand against regular troops, and their bands, unable to escape
from the ring of forces drawn round them, were rapidly dispersed over the
country. The people eagerly plundered and seized them in revenge for the
wrongs long suffered at their hands, and the Bhīl Grassias or border
landholders gladly carried out the instructions to hunt them down. On one
occasion a native havildar with only thirty-four men attacked and put a large
body of them to flight. The principal chiefs, reduced to the condition of
hunted outlaws in the jungles, soon accepted the promise of their lives, and
on surrendering were either settled on a grant of land or kept in confinement.
The well-known leader Chitu joined Apa Sāhib, who had then escaped from
Nāgpur and was in hiding in the Pachmarhi hills. Being expelled from there
in February 1819 he proceeded to the fort of Asīrgarh in Nimār, but was
refused admittance by Sindhia’s commandant. He sought shelter in the
neighbouring jungle, and on horseback and alone attempted to penetrate a
thick cover known to be infested with tigers. He was missed for some days
afterwards and no one knew what had become of him. His horse was at last
discovered grazing near the margin of the forest, saddled and bridled, and
exactly in the state in which it was when Chitu had last been seen upon it.

Page 488

Upon search a bag of Rs. 250 was found in the saddle; and several seal rings
with some letters of Apa Sāhib, promising future reward, served more
completely to fix the identity of the horse’s late master. These circumstances,
combined with the known resort of tigers to the spot, induced a search for
the body, when at no great distance some clothes clotted with blood, and
farther on fragments of bones, and at last the Pindāri’s head entire with
features in a state to be recognised, were successively discovered. The
chief’s mangled remains were given over to his son for interment, and the
miserable fate of one who so shortly before had ridden at the head of twenty
thousand horse gave an awful lesson of the uncertainty of fortune and drew
pity even from those who had been victims of his barbarity when living.8

7. Character of the Pindāris

The Pindāris, as might be expected, were recruited from all classes and
castes, and though many became Muhammadans the Hindus preserved the
usages of their respective castes. Most of the Hindu men belonged to the
Ladul or grass-cutter class, and their occupation was to bring grass and
firewood to the camps. “Those born in the Durrahs or camps,” Malcolm
states,9 “appear to have been ignorant in a degree almost beyond belief and
were in the same ratio superstitious. The women of almost all the
Muhammadan Pindāris dressed like Hindus and worshipped Hindu deities.
From accompanying their husbands in most of their excursions they became
hardy and masculine; they were usually mounted on small horses or camels,
and were more dreaded by the villagers than the men, whom they exceeded
in cruelty and rapacity.” Colonel Tod notes that the Pindāris, like other
Indian robbers, were devout in the observance of their religion:

“A short distance to the west of the Regent’s (Kotāh) camp is the Pindāri-ka-
chhaoni, where the sons of Karīm Khān, the chief leader of those hordes,
resided; for in those days of strife the old Regent would have allied himself
with Satan, if he had led a horde of plunderers. I was greatly amused to see
in this camp the commencement of an Id-Gāh or place of prayer; for the

Page 489

villains, while they robbed and murdered even defenceless women, prayed
five times a day!”10

8. The existing Pindāris

While the freebooting Pindāris had no regular caste organisation, their
descendants have now become more or less of a caste in accordance with the
usual tendency of a distinctive occupation, producing a difference in status,
to form a fresh caste. The existing Pindāris in the Central Provinces are both
Muhammadans and Hindus, the Muhammadans, as already stated, having
been originally the children of Hindus who were kidnapped and converted. It
is one of the very few merits of the Pindāris that they did not sell their
captives to slavery. Their numerous prisoners of all ages and both sexes were
employed as servants, made over to the chiefs or held to ransom from their
relatives, but the Pindāris did not carry on like the Banjāras a traffic in
slaves.11 The Muhammadan Pindāris were said some time ago to have no
religion, but with the diffusion of knowledge they have now adopted the
rites of Islam and observe its rules and restrictions. In Bhandāra the Hindu
Pindāris are Garoris or Gowāris, They say that the ancestors of the Pindāris
and Gowāris were two brothers, the business of the Pindāri brother being to
tend buffaloes and that of the Gowāri brother to herd cows. These Pindāris
will beg from the owners of buffaloes for the above reason. They revere the
dog and will not kill it, and also worship snakes and tigers, believing that
these animals never do them injury. They carry their dead to the grave in a
sitting posture, seated in a jholi or wallet, and bury them in the same
position. They wear their beards and do not shave. Some of these Pindāris
are personal servants, others cultivators and labourers, and others snake-
charmers and jugglers.

Page 490

9. Attractions of a Pindāri’s life

The freebooting life of the Pindāris, unmitigated scoundrels though they
were, no doubt had great charms, and must often have been recalled with
regret by those who settled down to the quiet humdrum existence of a
cultivator. This feeling has been admirably depicted in Sir Alfred Lyall’s
well-known poem, of which it will be permissible to quote a short extract:

When I rode a Dekhani charger with the saddle-cloth gold-laced,
And a Persian sword and a twelve-foot spear and a pistol at my
waist.
It’s many a year gone by now; and yet I often dream
Of a long dark march to the Jumna, of splashing across the stream,
Of the waning moon on the water and the spears in the dim starlight
As I rode in front of my mother12 and wondered at all the sight.
Then the streak of the pearly dawn—the flash of a sentinel’s gun,
The gallop and glint of horsemen who wheeled in the level sun,
The shots in the clear still morning, the white smoke’s eddying
wreath,
Is this the same land that I live in, the dull dank air that I breathe?
And if I were forty years younger, with my life before me to choose,
I wouldn’t be lectured by Kafirs or bullied by fat Hindoos;
But I’d go to some far-off country where Musalmāns still are men,
Or take to the jungle like Chetoo, and die in the tiger’s den.

1 The historical account of the Pindāris is compiled from Malcolm’s Memoir of Central India,
Grant-Duff’s History of the Marāthas, and Prinsep’s Transactions in India (1825). Some notes on
the modern Pindāris have been furnished by Mr. Hīra Lāl, and Mr. Waman Rustom Mandloi, Naib-
Tahsīldār, Harda.
2 Memoir of Central India, i, p. 433.

Page 491

3 Indian Antiquary, 1900.

4 Transactions in India, 1813–23, by H.T. Prinsep.
5 Marātha and Pindāri Campaigns.

6 The above is compiled from the accounts given by Prinsep and Malcolm.
7 That is when Malcolm wrote his Memoir.

8 This account is copied from Prinsep’s Transactions.
9 Memoir, ii. p. 177.

10 Rājasthān, ii. p. 674.
11 Malcolm, ii. p. 177.

12 The Pindāri’s childhood is recalled here, vide poem.

Page 492

Prabhu

1. Historical notice

Prabhu, Parbhu.—The Marātha caste of clerks, accountants and patwāris
corresponding to the Kāyasths. They numbered about 1400 persons in the
southern Districts of the Central Provinces and Berār in 1911. The Prabhus,
like the Kāyasths, claim to be descendants of a child of Chandra Sena, a
Kshatriya king and himself a son of Arjun, one of the five Pāndava brothers.
Chandra Sena was slain by Parasurāma, the Brāhman destroyer of the
Kshatriyas, but the child was saved by a Rishi, who promised that he should
be brought up as a clerk. The boy was named Somrāj and was married to the
daughter of Chitra Gupta, the recorder of the dead. The caste thus claim
Kshatriya origin. The name Prabhu signifies ‘lord,’ but the Brāhmans
pretend that the real name of the caste was Parbhu, meaning one of irregular
birth. The Prabhus say that Parbhu is a colloquial corruption used by the
uneducated. The gotras of the Prabhus are eponymous, the names being the
same as those of Brāhmans. In the Central Provinces many of them have the
surname of Chitnavīs or Secretary. Child-marriage is in vogue and widow-
remarriage is forbidden. The wedding ceremony resembles that of the
Brāhmans.

Page 493

Little girls playing

In his Description of a Prabhu marriage1 Rai Bahādur B.A. Gupte shows
how the old customs are being broken through among the educated classes
under the influence of modern ideas. Marriages are no longer arranged
without regard to the wishes of the couple, which are thus ascertained: “The
next step2 is to find out the inclination of the hero of the tale. His friends and
equals do that easily enough. They begin talking of the family and the girl,
and are soon able to fathom his mind. They leave on his desk all the
photographs of the girls offered and watch his movements. If he is sensible
he quietly drops or returns all the likenesses except the one he prefers, and
keeps this in his drawer. He dare not display it, for it is immodest to do so.
The news of the approval by the boy soon reaches the parents of the girl.”
Similarly in her case: “The girl has no direct voice, but her likes and dislikes
are carefully fathomed through her girl friends. If she says, ‘Why is papa in
such a hurry to get rid of me,’ or turns her face and goes away as soon as the
proposed family is mentioned, a sensible father drops the case and turns his
attention to some other boy. This is the direct result of higher education
under British rule, but among the masses the girl has absolutely no voice,
and the boy has very little unless he revolts and disobediently declines to
accept a girl already selected.” Similarly the educated Prabhus are beginning

Page 494

to dispense with the astrologer’s calculations showing the agreement of the
horoscopes of the couple, which are too often made a cloak for the extortion
of large presents. “It very often happens that everything is amicably settled
except the greed of the priest, and he manages to find out some disagreement
between the horoscopes of the marriageable parties to vent his anger. This
trick has been sufficiently exposed, and the educated portion of this ultra-
literary caste have in most cases discarded horoscopes and planetary
conjunctions altogether. Under these restrictions the only thing the council of
astrologers have to do is to draw up two documents giving diagrams based
on the names of the parties—for names are presumably selected according to
the conjunctions of the stars at birth. But they are often not, and depend on
the liking of the father for a family god, a mythological hero, a patron or a
celebrated ancestor in the case of the boy. In that of the girl the favourite
deity or a character in the most recent fable or drama the father has just
read.”

According to custom the bridegroom should go to the bride’s house to be
married, but if it is more convenient to have the wedding at the bridegroom’s
town, the bride goes there to a temporary house taken by her father, and then
the bridegroom proceeds to a temple with his party and is welcomed as if he
had arrived on completion of a journey. Mr. Gupte thus describes the
reception of the bride when she has come to be married: “But there comes an
urgent telegram. The bride and her mother are expected and information is
given to the bridegroom’s father. In all haste preparations are made to give
her a grand and suitable reception. Oh, the flutter among the girls assembled
in the house of the bridegroom from all quarters. Every one is dressed in her
best and is trying to be the foremost in welcoming the new bride, the
Goddess Lakshmi. The numerous maidservants of the house want to
prostrate themselves before their future queen on the Sūna or borderland of
the city, which is of course the railway station. Musicians have been already
despatched and the platform is full of gaily dressed girls. The train arrives,
the party assemble at the waiting-room, a maidservant waves rice and water
to ‘take off’ the effects of evil eyes and they start amid admiring eyes of the
passengers and onlookers. As soon as the bride reaches her father’s
temporary residence another girl waves rice and water and throws it away.
The girls of the bridegroom’s house run home and come back again with a

Page 495

Kalash (water-pot) full of water, with its mouth covered with mango-leaves
and topped over with a cocoanut and a large tray of sugar. This is called
Sakhar pāni, sugar and water, the first to wash the mouth with and the
second to sweeten it. The girls have by this time all gathered round the bride
and are busy cheering her up with encouraging remarks: ‘Oh, she is a Rati,
the goddess of beauty,’ says one, and another, ‘How delicate,’ ‘What a fine
nose’ from a third, and ‘Look at her eyes’ from a fourth. All complimentary
and comforting. ‘We are glad it is our house you are coming to,’ says a
sister-in-law in prospect. ‘We are happy you are going to be our mālikin
(mistress),’ adds a maidservant. As soon as the elder ladies have completed
their courteous inquiries pān-supāri and attar are distributed and the party
returns home. But on arrival the girls gather round the bridegroom to tease
him. ‘Oh, you Sudhārak (reformer),’ ‘Oh, you Sāhib (European), you have
selected your bride.’ ‘You have seen her before marriage. You have broken
the rule of the society. You ought to be excommunicated.’ ‘But,’ says
another, ‘he will now have no time to speak to us. His Rati (goddess of
beauty) and he! The Sāhib and the Memsāhib! We shall all be forgotten now.
Who cares for sisters and cousins in these days of civilisation?’ But all these
little jokes of the little girls are meant as congratulations to him for having
secured a good girl.” At a wedding among the highest families such as is
described here, the bridegroom is presented with drinking cups and plates,
trays for holding sandalwood paste, betel-leaf and an incense-burner, all in
solid silver to the value of about Rs. 1000; water-pots and cooking vessels
and a small bath in German silver costing Rs. 300 to Rs. 400; and a set of
brass vessels.3

Page 496

Gujarati girls doing figures with strings and sticks

2. General Customs

The Prabhus wear the sacred thread. In Bombay boys receive it a short time
before their marriage without the ceremonies which form part of the regular
Brāhman investiture. On the fifth day after the birth of a child, the sword and
also pens, paper and ink are worshipped, the sword being the symbol of their
Kshatriya origin and the pens, paper and ink of their present occupation of
clerks.4 The funeral ceremonies, Mr. Enthoven writes, are performed during
the first thirteen days after death. Oblations of rice are offered every day, in
consequence of which the soul of the dead attains a spiritual body, limb by
limb, till on the thirteenth day it is enabled to start on its journey. In twelve
months the journey ends, and a shrāddh ceremony is performed on an
extensive scale on the anniversary of the death. Most of the Prabhus are in
Government service and others are landowners. In the Bombay Presidency5

Page 497

they had at first almost a monopoly of Government service as English
writers, and the term Prabhu was commonly employed to denote a clerk of
any caste who could write English. Both men and women of the caste are
generally of a fair complexion, resembling the Marātha Brāhmans. The taste
of the women in dress is proverbial, and when a Sunār, Sutār or Kasār
woman has dressed herself in her best for some family festival, she will ask
her friends, ‘Prabhuin disto,’ or ‘Do I look like a Prabhu?’

1 Pamphlet published in connection with the Ethnographic Survey.

2 A Prabhu Marriage, p. 3 et seq.
3 A Prabhu Marriage, pp. 26–27.

4 Bombay Ethnographic Survey, art. Prabhu.
5 Bombay Gazetteer, ix. p. 68, footnotes.

Page 498

Rāghuvansi

1. Historical notice

Rāghuvansi, Rāghvi.—A class of Rājpūts of impure descent, who have now
developed in the Central Provinces into a caste of cultivators, marrying
among themselves. Their first settlement here was in the Nerbudda Valley,
and Sir C. Elliott wrote of them:1 “They are a queer class, all professing to
be Rājpūts from Ajodhia, though on cross-examination they are obliged to
confess that they did not come here straight from Ajodhia, but stopped in
Bundelkhand and the Gwalior territory by the way. They are obviously of
impure blood as they marry only among themselves; but when they get
wealthy and influential they assume the sacred thread, stop all familiarity
with Gūjars and Kirārs (with whom they are accustomed to smoke the huqqa
and to take water) and profess to be very high-caste Rājpūts indeed.” From
Hoshangābād they have spread to Betūl, Chhindwāra and Nāgpur and now
number 24,000 persons in all in the Central Provinces. Chhindwāra, on the
Satpūra plateau, is supposed to have been founded by one Ratan
Rāghuvansi, who built the first house on the site, burying a goat alive under
the foundations. The goat is still worshipped as the tutelary deity of the
town. The name Rāghuvansi is derived from Rāja Rāghu, king of Ajodhia
and ancestor of the great Rāma, the hero of the Rāmāyana. In Nāgpur the
name has been shortened to Rāghvi, and the branch of the caste settled here
is somewhat looked down upon by their fellows in Hoshangābād. Sir R.
Craddock2 states that their religion is unorthodox and they have gurus or
priests of their own caste, discarding Brāhmans. Their names end in Deo.
Their origin, however, is still plainly discernible in their height, strength of
body and fair complexion. The notice continues: “Whatever may happen to
other classes the Rāghvi will never give way to the moneylender. Though he

Page 499

is fond of comfort he combines a good deal of thrift with it, and the clannish
spirit of the caste would prevent any oppression of Rāghvi tenants by a
landlord or moneylender of their own body.” In Chhindwāra, Mr.
Montgomerie states,3 they rank among the best cultivators, and formerly
lived in clans, holding villages on bhaiachāri or communal tenure. As
mālguzārs or village proprietors, they are very prone to absorb tenant land
into their home-farms.

2. Social customs

The Rāghuvansis have now a set of exogamous groups of the usual low-
caste type, designated after titles, nicknames or natural objects. They
sometimes invest their sons with the sacred thread at the time of marriage
instead of performing the proper thread ceremony. Some discard the cord
after the wedding is over. At a marriage the Rāghuvansis of Chhindwara and
Nāgpur combine the Hindustāni custom of walking round the sacred pole
with the Marātha one of throwing coloured rice on the bridal couple.
Sometimes they have what is known as a gānkar wedding. At this, flour,
sugar and ghī4 are the only kinds of food permissible, large cakes of flour
and sugar being boiled in pitchers full of ghī, and everybody being given as
much of this as he can eat. The guests generally over-eat themselves, and as
weddings are celebrated in the hot weather, one or two may occasionally die
of repletion. The neighbours of Rāghuvansis say that the host considers such
an occurrence as evidence of the complete success of his party, but this is
probably a libel. Such a wedding feast may cost two or three thousand
rupees. After the wedding the women of the bride’s party attack those of the
bridegroom’s with bamboo sticks, while these retaliate by throwing red
powder on them. The remarriage of widows is freely permitted, but a widow
must be taken from the house of her own parents or relatives, and not from
that of her first husband or his parents. In fact, if any members of the dead
husband’s family meet the second husband on the night of the wedding they
will attack him and a serious affray may follow. On reaching her new house
the woman enters it by a back door, after bathing and changing all her

Page 500

clothes. The old clothes are given away to a barber or washerman, and the
presentation of new clothes by the second husband is the only essential
ceremony. No wife will look on a widow’s face on the night of her second
marriage, for fear lest by doing so she should come to the same position. The
majority of the caste abstain from liquor, and they eat flesh in some
localities, but not in others. The men commonly wear beards divided by a
shaven patch in the centre of the chin; and the women have two body-cloths,
one worn like a skirt according to the northern custom. Mr. Crooke states5
that “in northern India a tradition exists among them that the cultivation of
sugar is fatal to the farmer, and that the tiling of a house brings down divine
displeasure upon the owner; hence to this day no sugar is grown and not a
tiled house is to be seen in their estates.” These superstitions do not appear
to be known at all in the Central Provinces.

1 Hoshangābād Settlement Report (1807), p. 60.
2 Nāgpur Settlement Report.

3 Settlement Report.
4 Preserved butter.

5 Tribes and Castes, art. Raghūvansi.

Page 501

Page 502

Rājjhar

1. General notice

Rājjhar, Rājbhar, Lajjhar.—A caste of farmservants found in the northern
Districts. In 1911 they numbered about 8000 persons in the Central
Provinces, being returned principally from the Districts of the Satpūra
plateau. The names Rājjhar and Rājbhar appear to be applied
indiscriminately to the same caste, who are an offshoot of the great Bhar
tribe of northern India. The original name appears to have been Rāj Bhar,
which signifies a landowning Bhar, like Rāj-Gond, Rāj-Korku and so on. In
Mandla all the members of the caste were shown as Rājbhar in 1891, and
Rājjhar in 1901, and the two names seem to be used interchangeably in
other Districts in the same manner. Some section or family names, such as
Bamhania, Patela, Barhele and others, are common to people calling
themselves Rājjhar and Rājbhar. But, though practically the same caste, the
Rājjhars seem, in some localities, to be more backward and primitive than
the Rājbhars. This is also the case in Berār, where they are commonly
known as Lajjhar and are said to be akin to the Gonds. A Gond will there
take food from a Lajjhar, but not a Lajjhar from a Gond. They are more
Hinduised than the Gonds and have prohibited the killing or injuring of
cows by some caste penalties.1

2. Origin and subdivisions

Page 503

The caste appears to be in part of mixed origin arising from the unions of
Hindu fathers with women of the Bhar tribe. Several of their family names
are derived from those of other castes, as Bamhania (from Brāhman),
Sunārya (from Sunār), Baksaria (a Rājpūt sept), Ahīriya (an Ahīr or
cowherd), and Bisātia from Bisāti (a hawker). Other names are after plants
or animals, as Baslya from the bāns or bamboo, Mohanya from the mohin
tree, Chhitkaria from the sītaphal or custard-apple tree, Hardaya from the
banyan tree, Rīchhya from the bear, and Dukhania from the buffalo.
Members of this last sept will not drink buffalo’s milk or wear black cloth,
because this is the colour of their totem animal. Members of septs named
after other castes have also adopted some natural object as a sept totem;
thus those of the Sunārya sept worship gold as being the metal with which
the Sunār is associated. Those of the Bamhania sept revere the banyan and
pipal trees, as these are held sacred by Brāhmans. The Bakraria or Bagsaria
sept believe their name to be derived from that of the bāgh or tiger, and they
worship this animal’s footprints by tying a thread round them.

3. Marriage

The marriage of members of the same sept, and also that of first cousins, is
forbidden. The caste do not employ Brāhmans at their marriage and other
ceremonies, and they account for this somewhat quaintly by saying that
their ancestors were at one time accustomed to rely on the calculations of
Brāhman priests; but many marriages which the Brāhman foretold as
auspicious turned out very much the reverse; and on this account they have
discarded the Brāhman, and now determine the suitability or otherwise of a
projected union by the common primitive custom of throwing two grains of
rice into a vessel of water and seeing whether they will meet. The truth is
probably that they are too backward ever to have had recourse to the
Brāhman priest, but now, though they still apparently have no desire for his
services, they recognise the fact to be somewhat discreditable to
themselves, and desire to explain it away by the story already given. In
Hoshangābād the bride still goes to the bridegroom’s house to be married as

Page 504

among the Gonds. A bride-price is paid, which consists of four rupees, a
khandi2 of juāri or wheat, and two pieces of cloth. This is received by the
bride’s father, who, however, has in turn to pay seven rupees eight annas
and a goat to the caste panchāyat or committee for the arrangement and
sanction of the match. This last payment is known as Skarāb-ka-rupaya or
liquor-money, and with the goat furnishes the wherewithal for a sumptuous
feast to the caste. The marriage-shed must be made of freshly-cut timber,
which should not be allowed to fall to the ground, but must be supported
and carried off on men’s shoulders as it is cut. When the bridegroom arrives
at the marriage-shed he is met by the bride’s mother and conducted by her
to an inner room of the house, where he finds the bride standing. He seizes
her fist, which she holds clenched, and opens her fingers by force. The
couple then walk five times round the chauk or sacred space made with
lines of flour on the floor, the bridegroom holding the bride by her little
finger. They are preceded by some relative of the bride, who walks round
the post carrying a pot of water, with seven holes in it; the water spouts
from these holes on to the ground, and the couple must tread in it as they go
round the post. This forms the essential and binding portion of the marriage.
That night the couple sleep in the same room with a woman lying between
them. Next day they return to the bridegroom’s house, and on arriving at his
door the boy’s mother meets him and touches his head, breast and knees
with a churning-stick, a winnowing-fan and a pestle, with the object of
exorcising any evil spirits who may be accompanying the bridal couple. As
the pair enter the marriage-shed erected before the bridegroom’s house they
are drenched with water by a man sitting on the roof, and when they come
to the door of the house the bridegroom’s younger brother, or some other
boy, sits across it with his legs stretched out to prevent the bride from
entering. The girl pushes his legs aside and goes into the house, where she
stays for three months with her husband, and then returns to her parents for
a year. After this she is sent to her husband with a basket of fried cakes and
a piece of cloth, and takes up her residence with him. When a widow is to
be married, the couple pour turmeric and water over each other, and then
walk seven times round in a circle in an empty space, holding each other by
the hand. A widow commonly marries her deceased husband’s younger

Page 505

brother, but is not compelled to do so. Divorce is permitted for adultery on
the part of the wife.

4. Social Customs

The caste bury their dead with the head pointing to the west. This practice is
peculiar, and is also followed, Colonel Dalton states, by the hill Bhuiyas of
Bengal, who in so doing honour the quarter of the setting sun. When a
burial takes place, all the mourners who accompany the corpse throw a little
earth into the grave. On the same day some food and liquor are taken to the
grave and offered to the dead man’s spirit, and a feast is given to the caste-
fellows. This concludes the ceremonies of mourning, and the next day the
relatives go about their business. The caste are usually petty cultivators and
labourers, while they also collect grass and fuel for sale, and propagate the
lac insect. In Seoni they have a special relation with the Ahīrs, from whom
they will take cooked food, while they say that the Ahīrs will also eat from
their hands. In Narsinghpur a similar connection has been observed between
the Rājjhars and the Lodhi caste. This probably arises from the fact that the
former have worked for several generations as the farm-servants of Lodhi
or Ahīr employers, and have been accustomed to live in their houses and
partake of their meals, so that caste rules have been abandoned for the sake
of convenience. A similar intimacy has been observed between the Panwārs
and Gonds, and other castes who stand in this relation to each other. The
Rājjhars will also eat katcha food (cooked with water) from Kunbis and
Kahārs. But in Hoshangābād some of them will not take food from any
caste, even from Brāhmans. Their women wear glass bangles only on the
right hand, and a brass ornament known as māthi on the left wrist. They
wear no ornaments in the nose or ears, and have no breast-cloth. They are
tattooed with dots on the face and patterns of animals on the right arm, but
not on the left arm or legs. A liaison between a youth and maiden of the
caste is considered a trifling matter, being punished only with a fine of two
to four annas or pence. A married woman detected in an intrigue is mulcted
in a sum of four or five rupees, and if her partner be a man of another caste

Page 506

a lock of her hair is cut off. The caste are generally ignorant and dirty, and
are not much better than the Gonds and other forest tribes.

1 Kitts’ Berār Census Report (1881), p. 157.
2 About 400 lbs.

Page 507

Rājpūt
[The following article is based mainly on Colonel Tod’s classical Annals
and Antiquities of Rājasthān, 2nd ed., Madras, Higginbotham, 1873, and
Mr. Crooke’s articles on the Rājpūt clans in his Tribes and Castes of the
North-Western Provinces and Oudh. Much information as to the origin of
the Rājpūt clans has been obtained from inscriptions and worked up mainly
by the late Mr. A.M.T. Jackson and Messrs. B.G. and D.R. Bhandarkar; this
has been set out with additions and suggestions in Mr. V.A. Smith’s Early
History of India, 3rd ed., and has been reproduced in the subordinate
articles on the different clans. Though many of the leading clans are very
weakly represented in the Central Provinces, some notice of them is really
essential in an article treating generally of the Rājpūt caste, on however
limited a scale, and has therefore been included. In four cases, Panwār,
Jādum, Rāghuvansi and Daharia, the original Rājpūt clans have now
developed into separate cultivating castes, ranking well below the Rājpūts;
separate articles have been written on these as for independent castes.]

List of Paragraphs

1. Introductory notice
2. The thirty-six royal races
3. The origin of the Rājpūts
4. Subdivisions of the clans
5. Marriage customs
6. Funeral rites
7. Religion
8. Food
9. Opium
10. Improved training of Rājpūt chiefs
11. Dress
12. Social customs
13. Seclusion of women

Page 508

14. Traditional character of the Rājpūts
15. Occupation

1. Introductory notice

Rājpūt, Kshatriya, Chhatri, Thākur.—The Rājpūts are the
representatives of the old Kshatriya or warrior class, the second of the four
main castes or orders of classical Hinduism, and were supposed to have
been made originally from the arms of Brahma. The old name of Kshatriya
is still commonly used in the Hindi form Chhatri, but the designation
Rājpūt, or son of a king, has now superseded it as the standard name of the
caste. Thākur, or lord, is the common Rājpūt title, and that by which they
are generally addressed. The total number of persons returned as Rājpūts in
the Province in 1911 was about 440,000. India has about nine million
Rājpūts in all, and they are most numerous in the Punjab, the United
Provinces, and Bihār and Orissa, Rājputāna returning under 700,000 and
Central India about 800,000.

The bulk of the Rājpūts in the Central Provinces are of very impure blood.
Several groups, such as the Panwārs of the Wainganga Valley, the
Rāghuvansis of Chhindwāra and Nāgpur, the Jādams of Hoshangābād and
the Daharias of Chhattīsgarh, have developed into separate castes and marry
among themselves, though a true Rājpūt must not marry in his own clan.
Some of them have abandoned the sacred thread and now rank with the
good cultivating castes below Banias. Reference may be made to the
separate articles on these castes. Similarly the Sūrajvansi, Gaur or Gorai,
Chauhān, and Bāgri clans marry among themselves in the Central
Provinces, and it is probable that detailed research would establish the same
of many clans or parts of clans bearing the name of Rājpūt in all parts of
India. If the definition of a proper Rājpūt were taken, as it should be
correctly, as one whose family intermarried with clans of good standing, the
caste would be reduced to comparatively small dimensions. The name

Page 509

Dhākar, also shown as a Rājpūt clan, is applied to a person of illegitimate
birth, like Vidūr. Over 100,000 persons, or nearly a quarter of the total, did
not return the name of any clan in 1911, and these are all of mixed or
illegitimate descent. They are numerous in Nimār, and are there known as
chhoti-tur or low-class Rājpūts. The Bāgri Rājpūts of Seoni and the
Sūrajvansis of Betal marry among themselves, while the Bundelas of
Saugor intermarry with two other local groups, the Panwār and Dhundhele,
all the three being of impure blood. In Jubbulpore a small clan of persons
known as Pāik or foot-soldier return themselves as Rājpūts, but are no
doubt a mixed low-caste group. Again, some landholding sections of the
primitive tribes have assumed the names of Rājpūt clans. Thus the
zamīndārs of Bilāspur, who originally belonged to the Kawar tribe, call
themselves Tuar or Tomara Rājpūts, and the landholding section of the
Mundas in Chota Nāgpur say that they are of the Nāgvansi clan. Other
names are returned which are not those of Rājpūt clans or their offshoots at
all. If these subdivisions, which cannot be considered as proper Rājpūts,
and all those who have returned no clan be deducted, there remain not more
than 100,000 who might be admitted to be pure Rājpūts in Rājputāna. But a
close local scrutiny even of these would no doubt result in the detection of
many persons who have assumed and returned the names of good clans
without being entitled to them. And many more would come away as being
the descendants of remarried widows. A Rājpūt of really pure family and
descent is in fact a person of some consideration in most parts of the
Central Provinces.

2. The thirty-six royal races

Traditionally the Rājpūts are divided into thirty-six great clans or races, of
which Colonel Tod gives a list compiled from different authorities as
follows (alternative names by which the clan or important branches of it are
known are shown in brackets):

1. Ikshwaka or Sūrajvansi.

Page 510

2. Indu, Somvansi or Chandravansi.
3. Gahlot or Sesodia (Rāghuvansi).
4. Yādu (Bhatti, Jareja, Jādon, Banāphar).
5. Tuar or Tomara.
6. Rāthor.
7. Kachhwāha (Cutchwāha).
8. Prāmara or Panwār (Mori).
9. Chauhān (Hāra, Khichi, Nikumbh, Bhadauria).
10. Chalukya or Solankhi (Baghel).
11. Parihār.
12. Chawara or Chaura.
13. Tāk or Takshac (Nāgvansi, Mori).
14. Jit or Gete.
15. Hūna.
16. Kāthi.
17. Balla.
18. Jhalla.
19. Jaitwa or Kamari.
20. Gohil.
21. Sarweya.
22. Silar.
23. Dhābi.
24. Gaur.
25. Doda or Dor.
26. Gherwāl or Gaharwār (Bundela).
27. Badgūjar.
28. Sengar.
29. Sikarwāl.
30. Bais.
31. Dahia.
32. Johia.
33. Mohil.
34. Nikumbh.
35. Rājpali.
36. Dahima.

Page 511

And two extra, Hul and Daharia.

Several of the above races are extinct or nearly so, and on the other hand
some very important modern clans, as the Gautam, Dikhit and Bisen, and
such historically important ones as the Chandel and Haihaya, are not
included in the thirty-six royal races at all. Practically all the clans should
belong either to the solar and lunar branch, that is, should be descended
from the sun or moon, but the division, if it ever existed, is not fully given
by Colonel Tod. Two special clans, the Sūrajvansi and Chandra or
Somvansi, are named after the sun and moon respectively; and a few others,
as the Sesodia, Kachhwāha, Gohil, Bais and Badgūjar, are recorded as being
of the solar race, descended from Vishnu through his incarnation as Rāma.
The Rāthors also claimed solar lineage, but this was not wholly conceded
by the Bhāts, and the Dikhits are assigned to the solar branch by their
legends. The great clan of the Yādavas, of whom the present Jādon or
Jādum and Bhatti Rājpūts are representatives, was of the lunar race, tracing
their descent from Krishna, though, as a matter of fact, Krishna was also an
incarnation of Vishnu or the sun; and the Tuar or Tomara, as well as the Jit
or Gete, the Rājpūt section of the modern Jāts, who were considered to be
branches of the Yādavas, would also be of the moon division, The Gautam
and Bisen clans, who are not included in the thirty-six royal races, now
claim lunar descent. Four clans, the Panwār, Chauhān, Chalukya or
Solankhi, and Parihār, had a different origin, being held to have been born
through the agency of the gods from a firepit on the summit of Mount Abu.
They are hence known as Agnikula or the fire races. Several clans, such as
the Tāk or Takshac, the Hūna and the Chaura, were considered by Colonel
Tod to be the representatives of the Huns or Scythians, that is, the nomad
invading tribes from Central Asia, whose principal incursions took place
during the first five centuries of the Christian era.

At least six of the thirty-six royal races, the Sarweya, Silar, Doda or Dor,
Dahia, Johia and Mohil, were extinct in Colonel Tod’s time, and others
were represented only by small settlements in Rājputāna and Surat. On the
other hand, there are now a large number of new clans, whose connection
with the thirty-six is doubtful, though in many cases they are probably

Page 512

branches of the old clans who have obtained a new name on settling in a
different locality.

3. The origin of the Rājpūts

It was for long the custom to regard the Rājpūts as the direct descendants
and representatives of the old Kshatriya or warrior class of the Indian
Aryans, as described in the Vedas and the great epics. Even Colonel Tod by
no means held this view in its entirety, and modern epigraphic research has
caused its partial or complete abandonment Mr. V.A. Smith indeed says:1
“The main points to remember are that the Kshatriya or Rājpūt caste is
essentially an occupational caste, composed of all clans following the
Hindu ritual who actually undertook the act of government; that
consequently people of most diverse races were and are lumped together as
Rājpūts, and that most of the great clans now in existence are descended
either from foreign immigrants of the fifth or sixth century A.D. or from
indigenous races such as the Gonds and Bhars.” Colonel Tod held three
clans, the Tāk or Takshac, the Hūna and the Chaura, to be descended from
Scythian or nomad Central Asian immigrants, and the same origin has been
given for the Haihaya. The Hūna clan actually retains the name of the White
Huns, from whose conquests in the fifth century it probably dates its
existence. The principal clan of the lunar race, the Yādavas, are said to have
first settled in Delhi and at Dwārka in Gujarāt. But on the death of Krishna,
who was their prince, they were expelled from these places, and retired
across the Indus, settling in Afghānistan. Again, for some reason which the
account does not clearly explain, they came at a later period to India and
settled first in the Punjab and afterwards in Rājputāna. The Jit or Jāt and the
Tomara clans were branches of the Yādavas, and it is supposed that the Jits
or Jāts were also descended from the nomad invading tribes, possibly from
the Yueh-chi tribe who conquered and occupied the Punjab during the first
and second centuries.2 The legend of the Yādavas, who lived in Gujarāt
with their chief Krishna, but after his defeat and death retired to Central

Page 513

Asia, and at a later date returned to India, would appear to correspond fairly
well with the Sāka invasion of the second century B.C. which penetrated to
Kāthiāwār and founded a dynasty there. In A.D. 124 the second Sāka king
was defeated by the Andhra king Vilivāyakura II. and his kingdom
destroyed.3 But at about the same period, the close of the first century, a
fresh horde of the Sākas came to Gujarāt from Central Asia and founded
another kingdom, which lasted until it was subverted by Chandragupta
Vikramaditya about A.D. 390.4 The historical facts about the Sākas, as
given on the authority of Mr. V.A. Smith, thus correspond fairly closely
with the Yādava legend. And the later Yueh-chi immigrants might well be
connected by the Bhāts with the Sāka hordes who had come at an earlier
date from the same direction, and so the Jāts5 might be held to be an
offshoot of the Yādavas. This connection of the Yādava and Jāt legends
with the facts of the immigration of the Sākas and Yueh-chi appears a
plausible one, but may be contradicted by historical arguments of which the
writer is ignorant. If it were correct we should be justified in identifying the
lunar clans of Rājpūts with the early Scythian immigrants of the first and
second centuries. Another point is that Buddha is said to be the progenitor
of the whole Indu or lunar race.6 It is obvious that Buddha had no real
connection with these Central Asian tribes, as he died some centuries before
their appearance in India. But the Yueh-chi or Kushān kings of the Punjab
in the first and second centuries A.D. were fervent Buddhists and
established that religion in the Punjab. Hence we can easily understand
how, if the Yādus or Jāts and other lunar clans were descended from the
Sāka and Yueh-chi immigrants, the legend of their descent from Buddha,
who was himself a Kshatriya, might be devised for them by their bards
when they were subsequently converted from Buddhism to Hinduism. The
Sākas of western India, on the other hand, who it is suggested may be
represented by the Yādavas, were not Buddhists in the beginning, whether
or not they became so afterwards. But as has been seen, though Buddha was
their first progenitor, Krishna was also their king while they were in
Gujarāt, so that at this time they must have been supposed to be Hindus.
The legend of descent from Buddha arising with the Yueh-chi or Kushāns
might have been extended to them. Again, the four Agnikula or fire-born
clans, the Parihār, Chalukya or Solankhi, Panwār and Chauhān, are

Page 514

considered to be the descendants of the White Hun and Gūjar invaders of
the fifth and sixth centuries. These clans were said to have been created by
the gods from a firepit on the summit of Mount Abu for the re-birth of the
Kshatriya caste after it had been exterminated by the slaughter of
Parasurāma the Brāhman. And it has been suggested that this legend refers
to the cruel massacres of the Huns, by which the bulk of the old aristocracy,
then mainly Buddhist, was wiped out; while the Huns and Gūjars, one at
least of whose leaders was a fervent adherent of Brāhmanism and
slaughtered the Buddhists of the Punjab, became the new fire-born clans on
being absorbed into Hinduism.7 The name of the Huns is still retained in the
Hūna clan, now almost extinct. There remain the clans descended from the
sun through Rāma, and it would be tempting to suppose that these are the
representatives of the old Aryan Kshatriyas. But Mr. Bhandarkar has
shown8 that the Sesodias, the premier clan of the solar race and of all
Rājpūts, are probably sprung from Nāgar Brāhmans of Gujarāt, and hence
from the Gūjar tribes; and it must therefore be supposed that the story of
solar origin and divine ancestry was devised because they were once
Brāhmans, and hence, in the view of the bards, of more honourable origin
than the other clans. Similarly the Badgūjar clan, also of solar descent, is
shown by its name of bara or great Gūjar to have been simply an
aristocratic section of the Gūjars; while the pedigree of the Rāthors, another
solar clan, and one of those who have shed most lustre on the Rājpūt name,
was held to be somewhat doubtful by the Bhāts, and their solar origin was
not fully admitted. Mr. Smith gives two great clans as very probably of
aboriginal or Dravidian origin, the Gaharwār or Gherwāl, from whom the
Bundelas are derived, and the Chandel, who ruled Bundelkhand from the
ninth to the twelfth centuries, and built the fine temples at Mahoba,
Kālanjar and Khajarāho as well as making many great tanks. This
corresponds with Colonel Tod’s account, which gives no place to the
Chandels among the thirty-six royal races, and states that the Gherwāl
Rājpūt is scarcely known to his brethren in Rājasthān, who will not admit
his contaminated blood to mix with theirs, though as a brave warrior he is
entitled to their fellowship.9 Similarly the Kāthi clan may be derived from
the indigenous Kāthi tribe who gave their name to Kāthiāwār. And the
Sūrajvansi, Somvansi and Nāgvansi clans, or descendants of the sun, moon

Page 515

and snake, which are scarcely known in Rājputāna, may represent
landholding sections of lower castes or non-Aryan tribes who have been
admitted to Rājpūt rank. But even though it be found that the majority of
the Rājpūt clans cannot boast a pedigree dating farther back than the first
five centuries of our era, this is at any rate an antiquity to which few if any
of the greatest European houses can lay claim.

4. Subdivisions of the clans

Many of the great clans are now split up into a number of branches. The
most important of these were according to locality, the different sachae or
branches being groups settled in separate areas. Thus the Chalukya or
Solankhi had sixteen branches, of which the Baghels of Rewah or
Baghelkhand were the most important. The Panwārs had thirty-five
branches, of which the Mori and the Dhunda, now perhaps the Dhundele of
Saugor, are the best known. The Gahlot had twenty-four branches, of which
one, the Sesodia, became so important that it has given its name to the
whole clan. The Chamār-Gaur section of the Gaur clan now claim a higher
rank than the other Gaurs, though the name would apparently indicate the
appearance of a Chamār in their family tree; while the Tilokchandi Bais
form an aristocratic section of the Bais clan, named after a well-known
king, Tilokchand, who reigned in upper India about the twelfth century and
is presumably claimed by them as an ancestor. Besides this the Rājpūts have
gotras, named after eponymous saints exactly like the Brāhman gotras, and
probably adopted in imitation of the Brāhmans. Since, theoretically,
marriage is prohibited in the whole clan, the gotra divisions would appear
to be useless, but Sir H. Risley states that persons of the same clan but with
different gotras have begun to intermarry. Similarly it would appear that the
different branches of the great clans mentioned above must intermarry in
some cases; while in the Central Provinces, as already stated, several clans
have become regular castes and form endogamous and not exogamous
groups. In northern India, however, Mr. Crooke’s accounts of the different
clans indicate that marriage within the clan is as a rule not permitted. The

Page 516

clans themselves and their branches have different degrees of rank for
purposes of marriage, according to the purity of their descent, while in each
clan or subclan there is an inferior section formed of the descendants of
remarried widows, or even the offspring of women of another caste, who
have probably in the course of generations not infrequently got back into
their father’s clan. Thus many groups of varying status arise, and one of the
principal rules of a Rājpūt’s life was that he must marry his daughter,
sometimes into a clan of equal, or sometimes into one of higher rank than
his own. Hence arose great difficulty in arranging the marriages of girls and
sometimes the payment of a price to the bridegroom; while in order to
retain the favour of the Bhāts and avoid their sarcasm, lavish expenditure
had to be incurred by the bride’s father on presents to these rapacious
mendicants.10 Thus a daughter became in a Rājpūt’s eyes a long step on the
road to ruin, and female infanticide was extensively practised. This crime
has never been at all common in the Central Provinces, where the rule of
marrying a daughter into an equal or higher clan has not been enforced with
the same strictness as in northern India. But occasional instances formerly
occurred in which the child’s neck was placed under one leg of its mother’s
cot, or it was poisoned with opium or by placing the juice of the ākra or
swallow-wort plant on the mother’s nipple.

5. Marriage customs

Properly the proposal for a Rājpūt marriage should emanate from the
bride’s side, and the customary method of making it was to send a cocoanut
to the bridegroom. ‘The cocoanut came,’ was the phrase used to intimate
that a proposal of marriage had been made.11 It is possible that the bride’s
initiative was a relic of the Swayamwāra or maiden’s choice, when a king’s
daughter placed a garland on the neck of the youth she preferred among the
competitors in a tournament, and among some Rājpūts the Jāyamāla or
garland of victory is still hung round the bridegroom’s neck in memory of
this custom; but it may also have been due to the fact that the bride had to

Page 517

pay the dowry. One tenth of this was paid as earnest when the match had
been arranged, and the boy’s party could not then recede from it. At the
entrance of the marriage-shed was hung the toran, a triangle of three
wooden bars, having the apex crowned with the effigy of a peacock. The
bridegroom on horseback, lance in hand, proceeded to break the toran,
which was defended by the damsels of the bride. They assailed him with
missiles of various kinds, and especially with red powder made from the
flowers of the palās12 tree, at the same time singing songs full of immoral
allusions. At length the toran was broken amid the shouts of the retainers,
and the fair defenders retired. If the bridegroom could not attend in person
his sword was sent to represent him, and was carried round the marriage-
post, with the bride, this being considered a proper and valid marriage. At
the rite of hātleva or joining the hands of the couple it was customary that
any request made by the bridegroom to the bride’s father should meet with
compliance, and this usage has led to many fatal results in history. Another
now obsolete custom was that the bride’s father should present an elephant
to his son-in-law as part of the dowry, but when a man could not afford a
real elephant a small golden image of the animal might be substituted. In
noble families the bride was often accompanied to her husband’s house by a
number of maidens belonging to the servant and menial castes. These were
called Devadhari or lamp-bearers, and became inmates of the harem, their
offspring being golas or slaves. In time of famine many of the poor had also
perforce to sell themselves as slaves in order to obtain subsistence, and a
chiefs household would thus contain a large number of them. They were
still adorned in Mewār, Colonel Tod states, like the Saxon slaves of old,
with a silver ring round the left ankle instead of the neck. They were well
treated, and were often among the best of the military retainers; they took
rank among themselves according to the quality of the mothers, and often
held confidential places about the ruler’s person. A former chief of Deogarh
would appear at court with three hundred golas or slaves on horseback in
his train, men whose lives were his own.13 These special customs have now
generally been abandoned by the Rājpūts of the Central Provinces, and their
weddings conform to the usual Hindu type as described in the article on
Kurmi. The remarriage of widows is now recognised in the southern
Districts, though not in the north; but even here widows frequently do

Page 518

marry and their offspring are received into the caste, though with a lower
status than those who do not permit this custom. Among the Baghels a full
Rājpūt will allow a relative born of a remarried widow to cook his food for
him, but not to add the salt nor to eat it with him. Those who permit the
second marriage of widows also allow a divorced woman to remain in the
caste and to marry again. But among proper Rājpūts, as with Brāhmans, a
wife who goes wrong is simply put away and expelled from the society.
Polygamy is permitted and was formerly common among the chiefs. Each
wife was maintained in a separate suite of rooms, and the chief dined and
spent the evening alternately with each of them in her own quarters. The
lady with her attendants would prepare dinner for him and wait upon him
while he ate it, waving the punkah or fan behind him and entertaining him
with her remarks, which, according to report, frequently constituted a pretty
severe curtain lecture.

6. Funeral rites

The dead are burnt, except infants, whose bodies are buried. Mourning is
observed for thirteen days for a man, nine days for a woman, and three days
for a child. The shrāddh ceremony or offering of sacrificial cakes to the
spirit is performed either during the usual period in the month of Kunwār
(September), or on the anniversary day of the death. It was formerly held
that if a Kshatriya died on the battlefield it was unnecessary to perform his
funeral rites because his spirit went straight to heaven, and thus the end to
which the ceremonies were directed was already attained without them. It
was also said that the wife of a man dying such a death should not regard
herself as a widow nor undergo the privations imposed on widowhood. But
this did not apply so far as self-immolation was concerned, since the wives
of warriors dying in battle very frequently became sati. In the case of chiefs
also it was sometimes the custom, probably for political reasons, that the
heir should not observe mourning; because if he did so he would be
incapable of appearing in an assembly for thirteen days, or of taking the
public action which might be requisite to safeguard his succession. The

Page 519

body of the late chief would be carried out by the back door of the house,
and as soon as it left his successor would take his seat on the gaddi or
cushion and begin to discharge the public business of government.

7. Religion

The principal deity of the Rājpūts is the goddess Devi or Durga in her more
terrible form as the goddess of war. Their swords were sacred to her, and at
the Dasahra festival they worshipped their swords and other weapons of
war and their horses. The dreadful goddess also protected the virtue of the
Rājpūt women and caused to be enacted the terrible holocausts, not
infrequent in Rājpūt history, when some stronghold was besieged and could
hold out no longer. A great furnace was then kindled in the citadel and into
this the women, young and old, threw themselves, or else died by their
husbands’ swords, while the men, drunk with bhāng and wearing saffron-
coloured robes, sallied out to sell their lives to the enemy as dearly as
possible. It is related that on one occasion Akbar desired to attempt the
virtue of a queen of the Sesodia clan, and for that purpose caused her to lose
herself in one of the mazes of his palace. The emperor appeared before her
suddenly as she was alone, but the lady, drawing a dagger, threatened to
plunge it into her breast if he did not respect her, and at the same time the
goddess of her house appeared riding on a tiger. The baffled emperor gave
way and retired, and her life and virtue were saved.

The Rājpūts also worship the sun, whom many of them look upon as their
first ancestor. They revere the animals and trees sacred to the Hindus, and
some clans show special veneration to a particular tree, never cutting or
breaking the branches or leaves. In this manner the Bundelas revere the
kadamb tree, the Panwārs the nīm14 tree, the Rāthors the pīpal15 tree, and so
on. This seems to be a relic of totemistic usage. In former times each clan
had also a tribal god, who was its protector and leader and watched over the
destinies of the clan. Sometimes it accompanied the clan into battle. “Every
royal house has its palladium, which is frequently borne to battle at the

Page 520

saddle-bow of the prince. Rao Bhima Hāra of Kotah lost his life and
protecting deity together. The celebrated Khīchi (Chauhān) leader Jai Singh
never took the field without the god before him. ‘Victory to Bujrung’ was
his signal for the charge so dreaded by the Marātha, and often has the deity
been sprinkled with his blood and that of the foe.”16 It is said that a Rājpūt
should always kill a snake if he sees one, because the snake, though a
prince among Rājpūts, is an enemy, and he should not let it live. If he does
not kill it, the snake will curse him and bring ill-luck upon him. The same
rule applies, though with less binding force, to a tiger.

8. Food

The Rājpūts eat the flesh of clean animals, but not pigs or fowls. They are,
however, fond of the sport of pig-sticking, and many clans, as the Bundelas
and others, will eat the flesh of the wild pig. This custom was perhaps
formerly universal. Some of them eat of male animals only and not of
females, either because they fear that the latter would render them
effeminate or that they consider the sin to be less. Some only eat animals
killed by the method of jatka or severing the head with one stroke of the
sword or knife. They will not eat animals killed in the Muhammadan
fashion by cutting the throat. They abstain from the flesh of the nīlgai or
blue bull as being an animal of the cow tribe. Among the Brāhmans and
Rājpūts food cooked with water must not be placed in bamboo baskets, nor
must anything made of bamboo be brought into the rasoya or cooking-
place, or the chauka, the space cleaned and marked out for meals. A special
brush of date-palm fibre is kept solely for sweeping these parts of the
house. At a Rājpūt banquet it was the custom for the prince to send a little
food from his own plate or from the dish before him to any guest whom he
especially wished to honour, and to receive this was considered a very high
distinction. In Mewār the test of legitimacy in a prince of the royal house
was the permission to eat from the chief’s plate. The grant of this privilege
conferred a recognised position, while its denial excluded the member in

Page 521

question from the right to the succession.17 This custom indicates the
importance attached to the taking of food together as a covenant or
sacrament.

9. Opium

The Rājpūts abstain from alcoholic liquor, though some of the lower class,
as the Bundelas, drink it. In classical times there is no doubt that they drank
freely, but have had to conform to the prohibition of liquor imposed by the
Brāhmans on high-caste Hindus. In lieu of liquor they became much
addicted to the noxious drugs, opium and gānja or Indian hemp, drinking
the latter in the form of the intoxicating liquid known as bhāngs, which is
prepared from its leaves. Bhāng was as a rule drunk by the Rājpūts before
battle, and especially as a preparation for those last sallies from a besieged
fortress in which the defenders threw away their lives. There is little reason
to doubt that they considered the frenzy and carelessness of death produced
by the liquor as a form of divine possession. Opium has contributed much
to the degeneration of the Rājpūts, and their relapse to an idle, sensuous life
when their energies were no longer maintained by the need of continuous
fighting for the protection of their country. The following account by Forbes
of a Rājpūt’s daily life well illustrates the slothful effeminacy caused by the
drug:18 “In times of peace and ease the Rājpūt leads an indolent and
monotonous life. It is usually some time after sunrise before he bestirs
himself and begins to call for his hookah; after smoking he enjoys the
luxury of tea or coffee, and commences his toilet and ablutions, which
dispose of a considerable part of the morning. It is soon breakfast-time, and
after breakfast the hookah is again in requisition, with but few intervals of
conversation until noon. The time has now arrived for a siesta, which lasts
till about three in the afternoon. At this hour the chief gets up again, washes
his hands and face, and prepares for the great business of the day, the
distribution of the red cup, kusumba or opium. He calls together his friends
into the public hall, or perhaps retires with them to a garden-house. Opium

Page 522

is produced, which is pounded in a brass vessel and mixed with water; it is
then strained into a dish with a spout, from which it is poured into the
chief’s hand. One after the other the guests now come up, each protesting
that kusumba is wholly repugnant to his taste and very injurious to his
health, but after a little pressing first one and then another touches the
chief’s hand in two or three places, muttering the names of Deos (gods),
friends or others, and drains the draught. Each after drinking washes the
chief’s hand in a dish of water which a servant offers, and after wiping it
dry with his own scarf makes way for his neighbour. After this refreshment
the chief and his guests sit down in the public hall, and amuse themselves
with chess, draughts or games of chance, or perhaps dancing-girls are called
in to exhibit their monotonous measures, or musicians and singers, or the
never-failing favourites, the Bhāts and Chārans. At sunset the torch-bearers
appear and supply the chamber with light, upon which all those who are
seated therein rise and make obeisance towards the chief’s cushion. They
resume their seats, and playing, singing, dancing, story-telling go on as
before. At about eight the chief rises to retire to his dinner and his hookah,
and the party is broken up.” There is little reason to doubt that the Rājpūts
ascribed a divine character to opium and the mental exaltation produced by
it, as suggested in the article on Kalār in reference to the Hindus generally.
Opium was commonly offered at the shrines of deified Rājpūt heroes.
Colonel Tod states: “Umul lār khāna, to eat opium together, is the most
inviolable, pledge, and an agreement ratified by this ceremony is stronger
than any adjuration.”19 The account given by Forbes of the manner in which
the drug was distributed by the chief from his own hand to all his clansmen
indicates that the drinking of it was the renewal of a kind of pledge or
covenant between them, analogous to the custom of pledging one another
with wine, and a substitute for the covenant made by taking food together,
which originated from the sacrificial meal. It has already been seen that the
Rājpūts attached the most solemn meaning and virtue to the act of partaking
of the chief’s food, and it is legitimate to infer that they regarded the
drinking of a sacred drug like opium from his hand in the same light. The
following account20 of the drinking of healths in a Highland clan had, it
may be suggested, originally the same significance as the distribution of
opium by the Rājpūt chief: “Lord Lovat was wont in the hall before dinner

Page 523

to have a kind of herald proclaiming his pedigree, which reached almost up
to Noah, and showed each man present to be a cadet of his family, whilst
after dinner he drank to every one of his cousins by name, each of them in
return pledging him—the better sort in French claret, the lower class in
husky (whisky).” Here also the drinking of wine together perhaps implied
the renewal of a pledge of fealty and protection between the chief and his
clansmen, all of whom were held to be of his kin. The belief in the kinship
of the whole clan existed among the Rājpūts exactly as in the Scotch clans.
In speaking of the Rāthors Colonel Tod states that they brought into the
field fifty thousand men, Ek bāp ka beta, the sons of one father, to combat
with the emperor of Delhi; and remarks: “What a sensation does it not
excite when we know that a sentiment of kindred pervades every individual
of this immense affiliated body, who can point out in the great tree the
branch of his origin, of which not one is too remote from the main stem to
forget his pristine connection with it.”21

The taking of opium and wine together, as already described, thus appear to
be ceremonies of the same character, both symbolising the renewal of a
covenant between kinsmen.

10. Improved training of Rājpūt chiefs

The temptations to a life of idleness and debauchery to which Rājpūt
gentlemen were exposed by the cessation of war have happily been largely
met and overcome by the careful education and training which their sons
now receive in the different chiefs’ colleges and schools, and by the
fostering of their taste for polo and other games. There is every reason to
hope that a Rājpūt prince’s life will now be much like that of an English
country gentleman, spent largely in public business and the service of his
country, with sport and games as relaxation. Nor are the Rājpūts slow to
avail themselves of the opportunities for the harder calling of arms afforded
by the wars of the British Empire, in which they are usually the first to
proffer their single-hearted and unselfish assistance.

Page 524

11. Dress

The most distinctive feature of a Rājpūt’s dress was formerly his turban; the
more voluminous and heavy this was, the greater distinction attached to the
bearer. The cloth was wound in many folds above the head, or cocked over
one ear as a special mark of pride. An English gentleman once remarked to
the minister of the Rao of Cutch on the size and weight of his turban, when
the latter replied, ‘Oh, this is nothing, it only weighs fifteen pounds.’22 A
considerable reverence attached to the turban, probably because it was the
covering of the head, the seat of life, and the exchanging of turbans was the
mark of the closest friendship. On one occasion Shāh Jahān, before he came
to the throne of Delhi, changed turbans with the Rāna of Mewār as a mark
of amity. Shāh Jahān’s turban was still preserved at Udaipur, and seen there
by Colonel Tod in 1820. They also wore the beard and moustaches very
long and full, the moustache either drooping far below the chin, or being
twisted out stiffly on each side to impart an aspect of fierceness. Many
Rājpūts considered it a disgrace to have grey beards or moustaches, and
these were accustomed to dye them with a preparation of indigo. Thus dyed,
however, after a few days the beard and moustache assumed a purple tint,
and finally faded to a pale plum colour, far from being either deceptive or
ornamental. The process of dyeing was said to be tedious, and the artist
compelled his patient to sit many hours under the indigo treatment with his
head wrapped up in plantain leaves.23 During the Muhammadan wars,
however, the Rājpūts gave up their custom of wearing beards in order to be
distinguished from Moslems, and now, as a rule, do not retain them, while
most of them have also discarded the long moustaches and large turbans. In
battle, especially when they expected to die, the Rājpūts wore saffron-
coloured robes as at a wedding. At the same time their wives frequently
performed sati, and the idea was perhaps that they looked on their deaths as
the occasion of a fresh bridal in the warrior’s Valhalla. Women wear skirts
and shoulder-cloths, and in Rājputāna they have bangles of ivory or bone

Page 525

instead of the ordinary glass, sometimes covering the arm from the
shoulders to the wrist. Their other ornaments should be of gold if possible,
but the rule is not strictly observed, and silver and baser metals are worn.

12. Social customs

The Rājpūts wear the sacred thread, but many of them have abandoned the
proper upanayana or thread ceremony, and simply invest boys with it at
their marriage. In former times, when a boy became fit to bear arms, the
ceremony of kharg bandai, or binding on of the sword, was performed, and
considered to mark his attainment of manhood. The king himself had his
sword thus bound on by the first of his vassals. The Rājpūts take food
cooked with water (katchi) only from Brāhmans, and that cooked without
water (pakki) from Banias, and sometimes from Lodhis and Dhīmars.
Brāhmans will take pakki food from Rājpūts, and Nais and Dhīmars katchi
food. When a man is ill, however, he may take food from members of such
castes as Kurmi and Lodhi as a matter of convenience without incurring
caste penalties. The large turbans and long moustaches and beards no longer
characterise their appearance, and the only point which distinguishes a
Rājpūt is that his name ends with Singh (lion). But this suffix has also been
adopted by others, especially the Sikhs, and by such castes as the Lodhis
and Rāj-Gonds who aspire to rank as Rājpūts. A Rājpūt is usually addressed
as Thākur or lord, a title which properly applies only to a Rājpūt landholder,
but has now come into general use. The head of a state has the designation
of Rāja or Rāna, and those of the leading states of Mahārāja or Mahārāna,
that is, great king. Mahārāna, which appears to be a Gujarāti form, is used
by the Sesodia family of Udaipur. The sons of a Rāja are called Kunwar or
prince. The title Rao appears to be a Marāthi form of Rāj or Rāja; it is
retained by one or two chiefs, but has now been generally adopted as an
honorific suffix by Marātha Brāhmans. Rawat appears to have been
originally equivalent to Rājpūt, being simply a diminutive of Rājpūtra, the
Sanskrit form of the latter. It is the name of a clan of Rājpūts in the Punjab,
and is used as an honorific designation by Ahīrs, Saonrs, Kols and others.

Page 526

13. Seclusion of women

Women are strictly secluded by the Rājpūts, especially in Upper India, but
this practice does not appear to have been customary in ancient times, and it
would be interesting to know whether it has been copied from the
Muhammadans. It is said that a good Rājpūt in the Central Provinces must
not drive the plough, his wife must not use the rehnta or spinning-wheel,
and his household may not have the kathri or gudri, the mattress made of
old pieces of cloth or rag sewn one on top of the other, which is common in
the poorer Hindu households.

14. Traditional character of the Rājpūts

The Rājpūts as depicted by Colonel Tod resembled the knights of the age of
chivalry. Courage, strength and endurance were the virtues most highly
prized. One of the Rājpūt trials of strength, it is recorded, was to gallop at
full speed under the horizontal branch of a tree and cling to it while the
horse passed on. This feat appears to have been a common amusement, and
it is related in the annals of Mewār that the chief of Bunera broke his spine
in the attempt; and there were few who came off without bruises and falls,
in which consisted the sport. Of their martial spirit Colonel Tod writes:
“The Rājpūt mother claims her full share in the glory of her son, who
imbibes at the maternal fount his first rudiments of chivalry; and the
importance of this parental instruction cannot be better illustrated than in
the ever-recurring simile, ‘Make thy mother’s milk resplendent.’ One need
not reason on the intensity of sentiment thus implanted in the infant Rājpūt,
of whom we may say without metaphor the shield is his cradle and daggers
his playthings, and with whom the first commandment is ‘Avenge thy

Page 527

father’s feud.’24 A Rājpūt yet loves to talk of the days of chivalry, when
three things alone occupied him, his horse, his lance and his mistress; for
she is but third in his estimation after all, and to the first two he owed
her.”25 And of their desire for fame: “This sacrifice (of the Johar)
accomplished, their sole thought was to secure a niche in that immortal
temple of fame, which the Rājpūt bard, as well as the great minstrel of the
West peoples ‘with youths who died to be by poets sung.’ For this the
Rājpūt’s anxiety has in all ages been so great as often to defeat even the
purpose of revenge, his object being to die gloriously rather than to inflict
death; assured that his name would never perish, but, preserved in immortal
rhyme by the bard, would serve as the incentive to similar deeds.”26 He
sums up their character in the following terms: “High courage, patriotism,
loyalty, honour, hospitality and simplicity are qualities which must at once
be conceded to them; and if we cannot vindicate them from charges to
which human nature in every clime is obnoxious; if we are compelled to
admit the deterioration of moral dignity from continual inroads of, and their
consequent collision with rapacious conquerors; we must yet admire the
quantum of virtue which even oppression and bad example have failed to
banish. The meaner vices of deceit and falsehood, which the delineators of
national character attach to the Asiatic without distinction, I deny to be
universal with the Rājpūts, though some tribes may have been obliged from
position to use these shields of the weak against continuous oppression.”27
The women prized martial courage no less than the men: they would hear
with equanimity of the death of their sons or husbands in the battlefield,
while they heaped scorn and contumely on those who returned after defeat.
They were constantly ready to sacrifice themselves to the flames rather than
fall into the hands of a conqueror; and the Johar, the final act of a besieged
garrison, when the women threw themselves into the furnace, while the men
sallied forth to die in battle against the enemy, is recorded again and again
in Rājpūt annals. Three times was this tragedy enacted at the fall of Chitor,
formerly the capital fortress of the Sesodia clan; and the following vivid
account is given by Colonel Tod of a similar deed at Jaisalmer, when the
town fell to the Muhammadans:28 “The chiefs were assembled; all were
unanimous to make Jaisalmer resplendent by their deeds and preserve the
honour of the Yādu race. Muhāj thus addressed them: ‘You are of a warlike

Page 528

race and strong are your arms in the cause of your prince; what heroes excel
you who thus tread in the Chhatri’s path? For the maintenance of my
honour the sword is in your hands; let Jaisalmer be illumined by its blows
upon the foe.’ Having thus inspired the chiefs and men, Muhāj and Ratan
repaired to the palace of their queens. They told them to take the sohāg29
and prepare to meet in heaven, while they gave up their lives in defence of
their honour and their faith. Smiling the Rāni replied, ‘This night we shall
prepare, and by the morning’s light we shall be inhabitants of heaven’; and
thus it was with all the chiefs and their wives. The night was passed
together for the last time in preparation for the awful morn. It came;
ablutions and prayers were finished and at the royal gate were convened
children, wives and mothers. They bade a last farewell to all their kin; the
Johar commenced, and twenty-four thousand females, from infancy to old
age, surrendered their lives, some by the sword, others in the volcano of
fire. Blood flowed in torrents, while the smoke of the pyre ascended to the
heavens: not one feared to die, and every valuable was consumed with
them, so that not the worth of a straw was preserved for the foe. The work
done, the brothers looked upon the spectacle with horror. Life was now a
burden and they prepared to quit it They purified themselves with water,
paid adoration to the divinity, made gifts to the poor, placed a branch of the
tulsi30 in their casques, the sāligrām31 round their neck; and having cased
themselves in armour and put on the saffron robe, they bound the marriage
crown around their heads and embraced each other for the last time. Thus
they awaited the hour of battle. Three thousand eight hundred warriors,
their faces red with wrath, prepared to die with their chiefs.” In this account
the preparation for the Johar as if for a wedding is clearly brought out, and
it seems likely that husbands and wives looked on it as a bridal preparatory
to the resumption of their life together in heaven.

Colonel Tod gives the following account of a Rājpūt’s arms:32 “No prince
or chief is without his silla-khāna or armoury, where he passes hours in
viewing and arranging his arms. Every favourite weapon, whether sword,
dagger, spear, matchlock or bow, has a distinctive epithet. The keeper of the
armoury is one of the most confidential officers about the person of the
prince. These arms are beautiful and costly. The sirohi or slightly curved

Page 529

blade is formed like that of Damascus, and is the greatest favourite of all the
variety of weapons throughout Rājputāna. The long cut-and-thrust sword is
not uncommon, and also the khanda or double-edged sword. The
matchlocks, both of Lahore and the country, are often highly finished and
inlaid with mother-of-pearl and gold; those of Boondi are the best. The
shield of the rhinoceros-hide offers the best resistance, and is often
ornamented with animals beautifully painted and enamelled in gold and
silver. The bow is of buffalo-horn, and the arrows of reed, which are barbed
in a variety of fashions, as the crescent, the trident, the snake’s tongue, and
other fanciful forms.” It is probable that the forms were in reality by no
means fanciful, but were copied from sacred or divine objects; and similarly
the animals painted on the shields may have been originally the totem
animals of the clan.

15. Occupation

The traditional occupation of a Rājpūt was that of a warrior and landholder.
Their high-flown titles, Bhupāl (Protector of the earth), Bhupati (Lord of
the earth), Bhusur (God of the earth), Bahuja (Born from the arms),
indicate, Sir H. Risley says,33 the exalted claims of the tribe. The notion that
the trade of arms was their proper vocation clung to them for a very long
time, and has retarded their education, so that they have perhaps lost status
relatively to other castes under British supremacy. The rule that a Rājpūt
must not touch the plough was until recently very strictly observed in the
more conservative centres, and the poorer Rājpūts were reduced by it to
pathetic straits for a livelihood, as is excellently shown by Mr. Barnes in the
Kāngra Settlement Report:34 “A Miān or well-known Rājpūt, to preserve
his name and honour unsullied, must scrupulously observe four
fundamental maxims: first, he must never drive the plough; second, he must
never give his daughter in marriage to an inferior nor marry himself much
below his rank; thirdly, he must never accept money in exchange for the
betrothal of his daughter; and lastly, his female household must observe

Page 530

strict seclusion. The prejudice against the plough is perhaps the most
inveterate of all; that step can never be recalled; the offender at once loses
the privileged salutation; he is reduced to the second grade of Rājpūts; no
man will marry his daughter, and he must go a step lower in the social scale
to get a wife for himself. In every occupation of life he is made to feel his
degraded position. In meetings of the tribe and at marriages the Rājpūts
undefiled by the plough will refuse to sit at meals with the Hal Bāh or
plough-driver as he is contemptuously styled; and many to avoid the
indignity of exclusion never appear at public assemblies.... It is melancholy
to see with what devoted tenacity the Rājpūt clings to these deep-rooted
prejudices. Their emaciated looks and coarse clothes attest the vicissitudes
they have undergone to maintain their fancied purity. In the quantity of
waste land which abounds in the hills, a ready livelihood is offered to those
who will cultivate the soil for their daily bread; but this alternative involves
a forfeiture of their dearest rights, and they would rather follow any
precarious pursuit than submit to the disgrace. Some lounge away their time
on the tops of the mountains, spreading nets for the capture of hawks; many
a day they watch in vain, subsisting on berries and on game accidentally
entangled in their nets; at last, when fortune grants them success, they
despatch the prize to their friends below, who tame and instruct the bird for
the purpose of sale. Others will stay at home and pass their time in sporting,
either with a hawk or, if they can afford it, with a gun; one Rājpūt beats the
bushes and the other carries the hawk ready to be sprung after any quarry
that rises to the view. At the close of the day if they have been successful
they exchange the game for a little meal and thus prolong existence over
another span. The marksman armed with a gun will sit up for wild pig
returning from the fields, and in the same manner barter their flesh for other
necessaries of life. However, the prospect of starvation has already driven
many to take the plough, and the number of seceders daily increases. Our
administration, though just and liberal, has a levelling tendency; service is
no longer to be procured, and to many the stern alternative has arrived of
taking to agriculture and securing comparative comfort, or enduring the
pangs of hunger and death. So long as any resource remains the fatal step
will be postponed, but it is easy to foresee that the struggle cannot be long
protracted; necessity is a hard task-master, and sooner or later the pressure
of want will overcome the scruples of the most bigoted.” The objection to

Page 531

ploughing appears happily to have been quite overcome in the Central
Provinces, as at the last census nine-tenths of the whole caste were shown
as employed in pasture and agriculture, one-tenth of the Rājpūts being
landholders, three-fifths actual cultivators, and one-fifth labourers and
woodcutters. The bulk of the remaining tenth are probably in the police or
other branches of Government service.

1 Early History of India (Oxford, Clarendon Press), 3rd edition, p. 414.

2 Early History of India, pp. 252, 254.
3 Ibidem, p. 210.

4 Ibidem, p. 227.
5 Colonel Tod states that, the proper name of the caste was Jit or Jat, and was changed to Jāt by a
section of them who also adopted Muhammadanism. Colonel Tod also identifies the Jats or Jits
with the Yueh-chi as suggested in the text (Rājasthān, i. p. 97).

6 Rājasthān, i. p. 42. Mr. Crooke points out that the Buddha here referred to is probably the planet
Mercury. But it is possible that he may have been identified with the religious reformer as the
names seem to have a common origin.
7 See also separate articles on Panwār, Rājpūt and Gūjar.

8 J.A.S.B., 1909, p. 167, Guhilots. See also annexed article on Rājpūt Sesodia.
9 Ibidem, i. p. 105.

10 See also article Bhāt.
11 Rājasthān, i. pp. 231, 232.

12 Butea frondosa. This powder is also used at the Holi festival and has some sexual significance.
13 Rājasthān, i. p. 159.

14 Melia indica.
15 Ficus R.

16 Rājasthān, i. p. 123.
17 Rājasthān, i. pp. 267, 268.

18 Rāsmāla, ii. p. 261.

Rājasthān, i. p. 553.

Page 532

19 20 Reminiscences of Lady Dorothy Nevill, Nelson’s edition, p. 367.

21 Rājasthān, ii. p. 3.
22 Mrs. Postans, Cutch, p. 35.
23 Mrs. Postans, Cutch, p. 138.
24 Rājasthān, i. pp. 543, 544.

25 Ibidem, i. p. 125.
26 Ibidem, ii. p. 52.

27 Rājasthān, i. p. 552.
28 Vol. ii. p. 227.

29 A ceremony of smearing vermilion on the bride before a wedding, which is believed to bring
good fortune.
30 The basil plant, sacred to Vishnu.

31 A round black stone, considered to be a form of Vishnu.
32 Rājasthān, i. p. 555.

33 Tribes and Castes of Bengal. art. Rājpūt.
34 Quoted in Sir D. Ibbetson’s Punjab Census Report (1881), para. 456.

Page 533

Rājpūt, Baghel
Rājpūt, Baghel.—The Baghel Rājpūts, who have given their name to
Baghelkhand or Rewah, the eastern part of Central India, are a branch of the
Chalukya or Solankhi clan, one of the four Agnikulas or those born from
the firepit on Mount Abu. The chiefs of Rewah are Baghel Rājpūts, and the
late Mahārāja Raghurāj Singh has written a traditional history of the sept in
a book called the Bhakt Māla.1 He derives their origin from a child, having
the form of a tiger (bāgh) who was born to the Solankhi Rāja of Gujarāt at
the intercession of the famous saint Kabīr. One of the headquarters of the
Kabīrpanthi sect are at Kawardha, which is close to Rewah, and the ruling
family are members of the sect; hence probably the association of the
Prophet with their origin. The Bombay Gazetteer2 states that the founder of
the clan was one Anoka, a nephew of the Solankhi king of Gujarāt,
Kumarpāl (A.D. 1143–1174). He obtained a grant of the village Vaghela,
the tiger’s lair, about ten miles from Anhilvāda, the capital of the Solankhi
dynasty, and the Baghel clan takes its name from this village. Subsequently
the Baghels extended their power over the whole of Gujarāt, but in A.D.
1304 the last king, Karnadeva, was driven out by the Muhammadans, and
one of his most beautiful wives was captured and sent to the emperor’s
harem. Karnadeva and his daughter fled and hid themselves near Nāsik, but
the daughter was subsequently also taken, while it is not stated what
became of Karnadeva. Mr. Hīra Lāl suggests that he fled towards Rewah,
and that he is the Karnadeva of the list of Rewah Rājas, who married a
daughter of the Gond-Rājpūt dynasty of Garha-Mandla.3 At any rate the
Baghel branch of the Solankhis apparently migrated to Rewah from Gujarāt
and founded that State about the fourteenth century, as in the fifteenth they
became prominent. According to Captain Forsyth, the Baghels claim
descent from a tiger, and protect it when they can; and, probably, as
suggested by Mr. Crooke,4 the name is really totemistic, or is derived from
some ancestor of the clan who obtained the name of the tiger as a title or
nickname, like the American Red Indians. The Baghels are found in the

Page 534

Hoshangābād District, and in Mandla and Chhattīsgarh which are close to
Rewah. Amarkantak, at the source of the Nerbudda, is the sepulchre of the
Mahārājas of Rewah, and was ceded to them with the Sohāgpur tahsīl of
Mandla after the Mutiny, in consideration of their loyalty and services
during that period.

1 Mr. Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, art. Baghel.
2 Vol. i. part i. p. 198.
3 See also a history of the Baghels, called Pratāp Vinod, written by Khān Bahādur Rahmat Ali
Khān, and translated by Thākur Pratāp Singh, Revenue Commissioner of Rewah.

4 Article Baghel, quoting Forsyth’s Highlands of Central India.

Page 535

Rājpūt, Bāgri
Rājpūt, Bāgri.—This clan is found in small numbers in the Hoshangābād
and Seoni Districts. The name Bāgri, Malcolm says,1 is derived from that
large tract of plain called Bāgar or ‘hedge of thorns,’ the Bāgar being
surrounded by ridges of wooded hills on all sides as if by a hedge. The
Bāgar is the plain country of the Bikaner State, and any Jāt or Rājpūt
coming from this tract is called Bāgri.2 The Rājpūts of Bikaner are Rāthors,
but they are not numerous, and the great bulk of the people are Jāts. Hence
it is probable that the Bāgris of the Central Provinces were originally Jāts.
In Seoni they say that they are Baghel Rājpūts, but this claim is
unsupported by any tradition or evidence. In Central India the Bāgris are
professed robbers and thieves, but these seem to be a separate group, a
section of the Badhak or Bāwaria dacoits, and derived from the aboriginal
population of Central India. The Bāgris of Seoni are respectable cultivators
and own a number of villages. They rank higher than the local Panwārs and
wear the sacred thread, but will remove dead cattle with their own hands.
They marry among themselves.

1 Memoir of Central India, vol. ii. p. 479.

2 Punjab Census Report (1881), para. 445.

Page 536

Rājpūt, Bais
Rājpūt, Bais.1—The Bais are one of the thirty-six royal races. Colonel Tod
considered them a branch of the Sūrajvansi, but according to their own
account their eponymous ancestor was Sālivāhana, the mythic son of a
snake, who conquered the great Rāja Vikramaditya of Ujjain and fixed his
own era in A.D. 55. This is the Sāka era, and Sālivāhana was the leader of
the Sāka nomads who invaded Gujarāt on two occasions, before and shortly
after the beginning of the Christian era. It is suggested in the article on
Rājpūt that the Yādava lunar clan are the representatives of these Sākas, and
if this were correct the Bais would be a branch of the lunar race. The fact
that they are snake-worshippers is in favour of their connection with the
Yādavas and other clans, who are supposed to represent the Scythian
invaders of the first and subsequent centuries, and had the legend of being
descended from a snake. The Bais, Mr. Crooke says, believe that no snake
has destroyed, or ever can destroy, one of the clan. They seem to take no
precautions against the bite except hanging a vessel of water at the head of
the sufferer, with a small tube at the bottom, from which the water is poured
on his head as long as he can bear it. The cobra is, in fact, the tribal god.
The name is derived by Mr. Crooke from the Sanskrit Vaishya, one who
occupies the soil. The principal hero of the Bais was Tilokchand, who is
supposed to have come from the Central Provinces. He lived about A.D.
1400, and was the premier Rāja of Oudh. He extended his dominions over
all the tract known as Baiswāra, which comprises the bulk of the Rai Bareli
and Unao Districts, and is the home of the Bais Rājpūts. The descendants of
Tilokchand form a separate subdivision known as Tilokchandi Bais, who
rank higher than the ordinary Bais, and will not eat with them. The Bais
Rājpūts are found all over the United Provinces. In the Central Provinces
they have settled in small numbers in the northern and eastern Districts.

1 This article consists entirely of extracts from Mr. Crooke’s article on the Bais Rājpūts.

Page 537

Page 538

Rājpūt, Baksaria
Rājpūt, Baksaria.—A small clan found principally in the Bilāspur District,
who derive their name from Baxār in Bengal. They were accustomed to
send a litter, that is to say, a girl of their clan, to the harem of each Mughal
Emperor, and this has degraded them. They allow widow-marriage, and do
not wear the sacred thread. It is probable that they marry among
themselves, as other Rājpūts do not intermarry with them, and they are no
doubt an impure group with little pretension to be Rājpūts. The name
Baksaria is found in the United Provinces as a territorial subcaste of several
castes.

Page 539

Rājpūt, Banāphar
Rājpūt, Banāphar.—Mr. Crooke states that this sept is a branch of the
Yādavas, and hence it is of the lunar race. The sept is famous on account of
the exploits of the heroes Alha and Udal who belonged to it, and who
fought for the Chandel kings of Mahoba and Khajurāha in their wars
against Prithwi Rāj Chauhān, the king of Delhi. The exploits of Alha and
Udal form the theme of poems still well known and popular in
Bundelkhand, to which the sept belongs. The Banāphars have only a
moderately respectable rank among Rājpūts.1

1 Mr. Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, art. Banāphar.

Page 540

Rājpūt, Bhadauria
Rājpūt, Bhadauria.—An important clan who take their name from the
village of Bhadāwar near Ater, south of the Jumna. They are probably a
branch of the Chauhāns, being given as such by Colonel Tod and Sir H.M.
Elliot.1 Mr. Crooke remarks2 that the Chauhāns are disposed to deny this
relationship, now that from motives of convenience the two tribes have
begun to intermarry. If they are, as supposed, an offshoot of the Chauhāns,
this is an instance of the subdivision of a large clan leading to intermarriage
between two sections, which has probably occurred in other instances also.
This clan is returned from the Hoshangābād District.

1 Rājasthān, i. p. 88, and Supplementary Glossary, s.v.
2 Tribes and Castes, s.v.

Page 541

Rājpūt, Bisen
Rājpūt, Bisen.—This clan belongs to the United Provinces and Oudh. They
do not appear in history before the time of Akbar, and claim descent from a
well-known Brāhman saint and a woman of the Sūrajvansi Rājpūts whom
he married. The Bisens occupy a respectable position among Rājpūts, and
intermarry with other good clans.

Page 542

Rājpūt, Bundela
Rājpūt, Bundela.—A well-known clan of Rājpūts of somewhat inferior
position, who have given their name to Bundelkhand, or the tract comprised
principally in the Districts of Saugor, Damoh, Jhānsi, Hamīrpur and Bānda,
and the Panna, Orchha, Datia and other States. The Bundelas are held to be
derived from the Gaharwār or Gherwāl Rājpūts, and there is some reason
for supposing that these latter were originally an aristocratic section of the
Bhar tribe with some infusion of Rājpūt blood. But the Gaharwārs now rank
almost with the highest clans. According to tradition one of the Gaharwār
Rājas offered a sacrifice of his own head to the Vindhya-basini Devi or the
goddess of the Vindhya hills, and out of the drops (bund) of blood which
fell on the altar a boy was born. He returned to Panna and founded the clan
which bears the name Bundela, from bund, a drop.1 It is probable that, as
suggested by Captain Luard, the name is really a corruption of Vindhya or
Vindhyela, a dweller in the Vindhya hills, where, according to their own
tradition, the clan had its birth. The Bundelas became prominent in the
thirteenth or fourteenth century, after the fall of the Chandels. “Orchha
became the chief of the numerous Bundela principalities; but its founder
drew upon himself everlasting infamy, by putting to death the wise Abul
Fazl, the historian and friend of the magnanimous Akbar, and the encomiast
and advocate of the Hindu race. From the period of Akbar the Bundelas
bore a distinguished part in all the grand conflicts, to the very close of the
monarchy.”2

The Bundelas held the country up to the Nerbudda in the Central Provinces,
and, raiding continually into the Gond territories south of the Nerbudda on
the pretence of protecting the sacred cow which the Gonds used for
ploughing, they destroyed the castle on Chauragarh in Narsinghpur on a
crest of the Satpūras, and reduced the Nerbudda valley to subjection. The
most successful chieftain of the tribe was Chhatarsāl, the Rāja of Panna, in
the eighteenth century, who was virtually ruler of all Bundelkhand; his
dominions extending from Bānda in the north to Jubbulpore in the south,

Page 543

and from Rewah in the east to the Betwa River in the west. But he had to
call in the help of the Peshwa to repel an invasion of the Mughal armies,
and left a third of his territory by will to the Marāthas. Chhatarsāl left
twenty-two legitimate and thirty illegitimate sons, and their descendants
now hold several small Bundela States, while the territories left to the
Peshwa subsequently became British. The chiefs of Panna, Orchha, Datia,
Chhatarpur and numerous other small states in the Bundelkhand agency are
Bundela Rājpūts.3 The Bundelas of Saugor do not intermarry with the good
Rājpūt clans, but with an inferior group of Panwārs and another clan called
Dhundhele, perhaps an offshoot of the Panwārs, who are also residents of
Saugor. Their character, as disclosed in a number of proverbial sayings and
stories current regarding them, somewhat resembles that of the Scotch
highlanders as depicted by Stevenson. They are proud and penurious to the
last degree, and quick to resent the smallest slight. They make good shikāris
or sportsmen, but are so impatient of discipline that they have never found a
vocation by enlisting in the Indian Army. Their characteristics are thus
described in a doggerel verse: “The Bundelas salute each other from miles
apart, their pagris are cocked on the side of the head till they touch the
shoulders. A Bundela would dive into a well for the sake of a cowrie, but
would fight with the Sardārs of Government.” No Bania could go past a
Bundela’s house riding on a pony or holding up an umbrella; and all low-
caste persons who passed his house must salute it with the words, Diwān ji
ko Rām Rām. Women must take their shoes off to pass by. It is related that a
few years ago a Bundela was brought up before the Assistant
Commissioner, charged with assaulting a tahsīl process-server, and
threatening him with his sword. The Bundela, who was very poor and
wearing rags, was asked by the magistrate whether he had threatened the
man with his sword. He replied “Certainly not; the sword is for gentlemen
like you and me of equal position. To him, if I had wished to beat him I
would have taken my shoe.” Another story is that there was once a very
overbearing Tahsīldār, who had a shoe 2½ feet long with which he used to
collect the land revenue. One day a Bundela mālguzār appeared before him
on some business. The Tahsīldār kept his seat. The Bundela walked quietly
up to the table and said, “Will the Sirkār step aside with me for a moment,
as I have something private to say.” The Tahsīldār got up and walked aside

Page 544

with him, on which the Bundela said, ‘That is sufficient, I only wished to
tell you that you should rise to receive me.’ When the Bundelas are
collected at a feast they sit with their hands folded across their stomachs
and their eyes turned up, and remain impassive while food is being put on
their plates, and never say, ‘Enough,’ because they think that they would
show themselves to be feeble men if they refused to eat as much as was put
before them. Much of the food is thus ultimately wasted, and given to the
sweepers, and this leads to great extravagance at marriages and other
ceremonial occasions. The Bundelas were much feared and were not
popular landlords, but they are now losing their old characteristics and
settling down into respectable cultivators.

1 Mr. Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, art. Bundela.
2 Rājasthān, i. p. 106.
3 Imperial Gazetteer, articles Bundelkhand and Panna.

Page 545

Rājpūt, Chandel
Rājpūt, Chandel.—An important clan of Rājpūts, of which a small number
reside in the northern Districts of Saugor, Damoh and Jubbulpore, and also
in Chhattīsgarh. The name is derived by Mr. Crooke from the Sanskrit
chandra, the moon. The Chandel are not included in the thirty-six royal
races, and are supposed to have been a section of one of the indigenous
tribes which rose to power. Mr. V.A. Smith states that the Chandels, like
several other dynasties, first came into history early in the ninth century,
when Nannuka Chandel about A.D. 831 overthrew a Parihār chieftain and
became lord of the southern parts of Jejākabhukti or Bundelkhand. Their
chief towns were Mahoba and Kālanjar in Bundelkhand, and they gradually
advanced northwards till the Jumna became the frontier between their
dominions and those of Kanauj. They fought with the Gūjar-Parihār kings
of Kanauj and the Kālachuris of Chedi, who had their capital at Tewar in
Jubbulpore, and joined in resisting the incursions of the Muhammadans. In
A.D. 1182 Parmāl, the Chandel king, was defeated by Prithwi Rāja, the
Chauhān king of Delhi, after the latter had abducted the Chandel’s daughter.
This was the war in which Alha and Udal, the famous Banāphar heroes,
fought for the Chandels, and it is commemorated in the Chand-Raisa, a
poem still well known to the people of Bundelkhand. In A.D. 1203 Kālanjar
was taken by the Muhammadan Kutb-ud-Dīn Ibak, and the importance of
the Chandel rulers came to an end, though they lingered on as purely local
chiefs until the sixteenth century. The Chandel princes were great builders,
and beautified their chief towns, Mahoba, Kālanjar and Khajurāho with
many magnificent temples and lovely lakes, formed by throwing massive
dams across the openings between the hills.1 Among these were great
irrigation works in the Hamīrpur District, the forts of Kālanjar and Ajaighar,
and the noble temples at Khajurāho and Mahoba.2 Even now the ruins of
old forts and temples in the Saugor and Damoh Districts are attributed by
the people to the Chandels, though many were in fact probably constructed
by the Kālachuris of Chedi.

Page 546

Mr. Smith derives the Chandels either from the Gonds or Bhars, but inclines
to the view that they were Gonds. The following considerations tend, I
venture to think, to favour the hypothesis of their origin from the Bhars.
According to the best traditions, the Gonds came from the south, and
practically did not penetrate to Bundelkhand. Though Saugor and Damoh
contain a fair number of Gonds they have never been of importance there,
and this is almost their farthest limit to the north-west. The Gond States in
the Central Provinces did not come into existence for several centuries after
the commencement of the Chandel dynasty, and while there are authentic
records of all these states, the Gonds have no tradition of their dominance in
Bundelkhand. The Gonds have nowhere else built such temples as are
attributed to the Chandels at Khajurāho, whilst the Bhars were famous
builders. “In Mīrzāpur traces of the Bhars abound on all sides in the shape
of old tanks and village forts. The bricks found in the Bhar-dīhs or forts are
of enormous dimensions, and frequently measure 19 by 11 inches, and are
2¼ inches thick. In quality and size they are similar to bricks often seen in
ancient Buddhist buildings. The old capital of the Bhars, five miles from
Mīrzāpur, is said to have had 150 temples.”3 Elliot remarks4 that “common
tradition assigns to the Bhars the possession of the whole tract from
Gorakhpur to Bundelkhand and Saugor, and many old stone forts,
embankments and subterranean caverns in Gorakhpur, Azamgarh, Jaunpur,
Mīrzāpur and Allahābād, which are ascribed to them, would seem to
indicate no inconsiderable advance in civilisation.” Though there are few or
no Bhars now in Bundelkhand, there are a large number of Pāsis in
Allahābād which partly belongs to it, and small numbers in Bundelkhand;
and the Pāsi caste is mainly derived from the Bhars;5 while a Gaharwār
dynasty, which is held to be derived from the Bhars, was dominant in
Bundelkhand and Central India before the rise of the Chandels. According
to one legend, the ancestor of the Chandels was born with the moon as a
father from the daughter of the high priest of the Gaharwār Rāja Indrajīt of
Benāres or of Indrajīt himself.6 As will be seen, the Gaharwārs were an
aristocratic section of the Bhars. Another legend states that the first Chandel
was the offspring of the moon by the daughter of a Brāhman Pandit of
Kalanjar.7 In his Notes on the Bhars of Bundelkhand8 Mr. Smith argues that
the Bhars adopted the Jain religion, and also states that several of the

Page 547

temples at Khajurāho and Mahoba, erected in the eleventh century, are Jain.
These were presumably erected by the Chandels, but I have never seen it
suggested that the Gonds were Jains or were capable of building Jain
temples in the eleventh century. Mr. Smith also states that Maniya Deo, to
whom a temple exists at Mahoba, was the tutelary deity of the Chandels;
and that the only other shrine of Maniya Deo discovered by him in the
Hamīrpur District was in a village reputed formerly to have been held by
the Bhars.9 Two instances of intercourse between the Chandels and Gonds
are given, but the second of them, that the Rāni Dūrgavati of Mandla was a
Chandel princess, belongs to the sixteenth century, and has no bearing on
the origin of the Chandels. The first instance, that of the Chandel Rāja Kīrat
Singh hunting at Maniagarh with the Gond Rāja of Garha-Mandla, cannot
either be said to furnish any real evidence in favour of a Gond origin for the
Chandels; it maybe doubted whether there was any Gond Rāja of Garha-
Mandla till after the fall of the Kālachuri dynasty of Tewar, which is quite
close to Garha-Mandla, in the twelfth century; and a reference so late as this
would not affect the question.10 Finally, the Chandels are numerous in
Mīrzāpur, which was formerly the chief seat of the Bhars, while the Gonds
have never been either numerous or important in Mīrzāpur. These
considerations seem to point to the possibility of the derivation of the
Chandels from the Bhars rather than from the Gonds; and the point is
perhaps of some interest in view of the suggestion in the article on Kol that
the Gonds did not arrive in the Central Provinces for some centuries after
the rise of the Chandel dynasty of Khajurāho and Mahoba. The Chandels
may have simply been a local branch of the Gaharwārs, who obtained a
territorial designation from Chanderi, or in some other manner, as has
continually happened in the case of other clans. The Gaharwārs were
probably derived from the Bhars. The Chandels now rank as a good Rājpūt
clan, and intermarry with the other leading clans.

1 Early History of India, 3rd edition, pp. 390–394.
2 Mr. Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, art. Chandel.

3 Sherring’s Castes and Tribes, i. pp. 359, 360.
4 Supplemental Glossary, art. Bhar.

Page 548

5 See art. Pāsi.

6 Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, art. Chandel.
7 Ibidem.

8 J.A.S.B. vol. xlvi. (1877), p. 232.
9 Ibidem, p. 233.

10 J.A.S.B. vol. xlvi. (1877), p. 233.

Page 549

Rājpūt, Chauhān
Rājpūt, Chauhān.—The Chauhān was the last of the Agnikula or fire-born
clans, According to the legend: “Again Vasishtha seated on the lotus
prepared incantations; again he called the gods to aid; and as he poured
forth the libation a figure arose, lofty in stature, of elevated front, hair like
jet, eyes rolling, breast expanded, fierce, terrific, clad in armour with quiver
filled, a bow in one hand and a brand in the other, quadriform (Chaturanga),
whence his name was given as Chauhān.” This account makes the Chauhān
the most important of the fire-born clans, and Colonel Tod says that he was
the most valiant of the Agnikulas, and it may be asserted not of them only
but of the whole Rājpūt race; and though the swords of the Rāhtors would
be ready to contest the point, impartial decision must assign to the Chauhān
the van in the long career of arms.1 General Cunningham shows that even
so late as the time of Prithwi Rāj in the twelfth century the Chauhāns had no
claim to be sprung from fire, but were content to be considered descendants
of a Brāhman sage Bhrigu.2 Like the other Agnikula clans the Chauhāns are
now considered to have sprung from the Gurjara or White Hun invaders of
the fifth and sixth centuries, but I do not know whether this is held to be
definitely proved in their case. Sāmbhar and Ajmer in Rājputāna appear to
have been the first home of the clan, and inscriptions record a long line of
thirty-nine kings as reigning there from Anhul, the first created Chauhān.
The last but one of them, Vigraha Rāja or Bisāl Deo, in the middle of the
twelfth century extended the ancestral dominions considerably, and
conquered Delhi from a chief of the Tomara clan. At this time the
Chauhāns, according to their own bards, held the line of the Nerbudda from
Garha-Mandla to Maheshwar and also Asīrgarh, while their dominions
extended north to Hissar and south to the Aravalli hills.3 The nephew of
Bisāl Deo was Prithwi Rāj, the most famous Chauhān hero, who ruled at
Sāmbhar, Ajmer and Delhi. His first exploit was the abduction of the
daughter of Jaichand, the Gaharwār Rāja of Kanauj, in about A.D. 1175.
The king of Kanauj had claimed the title of universal sovereign and

Page 550

determined to celebrate the Ashwa-Medha or horse-sacrifice, at which all
the offices should be performed by vassal kings. Prithwi Rāj alone declined
to attend as a subordinate, and Jaichand therefore made a wooden image of
him and set it up at the gate in the part of doorkeeper. But when his
daughter after the tournament took the garland of flowers to bestow it on
the chief whom she chose for her husband, she passed by all the assembled
nobles and threw the garland on the neck of the wooden image. At this
moment Prithwi Rāj dashed in with a few companions, and catching her up,
escaped with her from her father’s court.4 Afterwards, in 1182, Prithwi Rāj
defeated the Chandel Rāja Parmāl and captured Mahoba. In 1191 Prithwi
Rāj was the head of a confederacy of Hindu princes in combating the
invasion of Muhammad Ghori. He repelled the Muhammadans at Tarāin
about two miles north of Delhi, but in the following year was completely
defeated and killed at Thaneswar, and soon afterwards Delhi and Ajmer fell
to the Muhammadans. The Chauhān kingdom was broken up, but scattered
parts of it remained, and about A.D. 1307 Asīrgarh in Nimār, which
continued to be held by the Chauhāns, was taken by Ala-ud-Dīn Khilji and
the whole garrison put to the sword except one boy. This boy, Raisi
Chauhān, escaped to Rājputāna, and according to the bardic chronicle his
descendants formed the Hāra branch of the Chauhāns and conquered from
the Mīnas the tract known as Hāravati, from which they perhaps took their
name.5 This is now comprised in the Kotah and Bundi states, ruled by Hāra
chiefs. Another well-known offshoot from the Chauhāns are the Khīchi
clan, who belong to the Sind-Sāgar Doāb; and the Nikumbh and Bhadauria
clans are also derived from them. The Chauhāns are numerous in the Punjab
and United Provinces and rank as one of the highest Rājpūt clans. In the
Central Provinces they are found principally in the Narsinghpur and
Hoshangābād Districts, and also in Mandla. The Chauhān Rājpūts of
Mandla marry among themselves, with other Chauhāns of Mandla, Seoni
and Bālāghāt They have exogamous sections with names apparently derived
from villages like an ordinary caste. The remarriage of widows is forbidden,
but those widows who desire to do so go and live with a man and are put
out of caste. This, however, is said not to happen frequently. A widow’s hair
is not shaved, but her glass bangles are broken, she is dressed in white,
made to sleep on the ground, and can wear no ornaments. Owing to the

Page 551

renown of the clan their name has been adopted by numerous classes of
inferior Rājpūts and low Hindu castes who have no right to it. Thus in the
Punjab a large subcaste of Chamārs call themselves Chauhān, and in the
Bilāspur District a low caste of village watchmen go by this name. These
latter may be descendants of the illegitimate offspring of Chauhān Rājpūts
by low-caste women.

1 Rājasthān, i. pp. 86, 87.

2 Archaeological Reports, ii. 255, quoted in Mr. Crooke’s art. Chauhān.
3 Imperial Gazetteer, India, vol. ii, p. 312.

4 Early History of India and Imperial Gazetteer, loc. cit.
5 Rājasthān, ii. p. 419.

Page 552

Rājpūt, Dhākar
Rājpūt, Dhākar.—In the Central Provinces this term has the meaning of
one of illegitimate descent, and it is often used by the Kirārs, who are
probably of mixed descent from Rājpūts. In northern India, however, the
Dhākars are a clan of Rājpūts, who claim Sūrajvansi origin; but this is not
generally admitted. Mr. Crooke states that some are said to be emigrants
from the banks of the Nerbudda; but the main body say they came from
Ajmer in the sixteenth century. They were notorious in the eighteenth
century for their lawlessness, and gave the imperial Mughal officers much
trouble in the neighbourhood of Agra, rendering the communications
between that city and Etāwah insecure. In the Mutiny they broke out again,
and are generally a turbulent, ill-conducted sept, always ready for petty acts
of violence and cattle-stealing. They are, however, recognised as Rājpūts of
good position and intermarry with the best clans.1

In the Central Provinces the Dhākars are found principally in Hoshangābād,
and it is doubtful if they are proper Rājpūts.

1 The above particulars are taken from Mr. Crooke’s article Dhākara in his Tribes and Castes.

Page 553

Rājpūt, Gaharwār
Rājpūt, Gaharwār, Gherwāl.—This is an old clan. Mr. V.A. Smith states
that they had been dominant in Central India about Nowgong and
Chhatarpur before the Parihārs in the eighth century. The Parihār kings were
subsequently overthrown by the Chandels of Mahoba. In their practice of
building embankments and constructing lakes the Chandels were imitators
of the Gaharwārs, who are credited with the formation of some of the most
charming lakes in Bundelkhand.1 And in A.D. 1090 a Rāja of the Gaharwār
clan called Chandradeva seized Kanauj (on the Ganges north-west of
Lucknow), and established his authority certainly over Benāres and
Ajodhia, and perhaps over the Delhi territory. Govindachandra, grandson of
Chandradeva, enjoyed a long reign, which included the years A.D. 1114 and
1154. His numerous land grants and widely distributed coins prove that he
succeeded to a large extent in restoring the glories of Kanauj, and in making
himself a power of considerable importance. The grandson of
Govindachandra was Jayachandra, renowned in the popular Hindu poems
and tales of northern India as Rāja Jaichand, whose daughter was carried off
by the gallant Rai Pithora or Prithwi Rāj of Ajmer. Kanauj was finally
captured and destroyed by Shihāb-ud-Dīn in 1193, when Jaichand retired
towards Benāres but was overtaken and slain.2 His grandson, Mr. Crooke
says,3 afterwards fled to Kantit in the Mīrzāpur District and, overcoming
the Bhar Rāja of that place, founded the family of the Gaharwār Rājas of
Kantīt Bijaypur, which was recently still in existence. All the other
Gaharwārs trace their lineage to Benāres or Bijaypur. The predecessors of
the Gaharwārs in Kantit and in a large tract of country lying contiguous to it
were the Bhars, an indigenous race of great enterprise, who, though not
highly civilised, were far removed from barbarism. According to Sherring
they have left numerous evidences of their energy and skill in earthworks,
forts, dams and the like.4 Similarly Elliot says of the Bhars: “Common
tradition assigns to them the possession of the whole tract from Gorakhpur
to Bundelkhand and Saugor, and the large pargana of Bhadoi or Bhardai in

Page 554

Benāres is called after their name. Many old stone forts, embankments and
subterranean caverns in Gorakhpur, Azamgarh, Jaunpur, Mīrzāpur and
Allahābād, which are ascribed to them, would seem to indicate no
inconsiderable advance in civilisation.”5 Colonel Tod says of the
Gaharwārs: “The Gherwāl Rājpūt is scarcely known to his brethren in
Rājasthān, who will not admit his contaminated blood to mix with theirs,
though as a brave warrior he is entitled to their fellowship.”6 It is thus
curious that the Gaharwārs, who are one of the oldest clans to appear in
authentic history, if they ruled Central India in the eighth century before the
Parihārs, should be considered to be of very impure origin. And as they are
subsequently found in Mīrzāpur, a backward forest tract which is also the
home of the Bhars, and both the Gaharwārs and Bhars have a reputation as
builders of tanks and forts, it seems likely that the Gaharwārs were really, as
suggested by Mr. V.A. Smith, the aristocratic branch of the Bhars, probably
with a considerable mixture of Rājpūt blood. Elliot states that the Bhars
formerly occupied the whole of Azamgarh, the pargana of Bara in
Allahābād and Khariagarh in the Kanauj tract. This widespread dominance
corresponds with what has been already stated as regards the Gaharwārs,
who, according to Mr. V.A. Smith, ruled in Central India, Kanauj, Oudh,
Benāres and Mīrzāpur. And the name Gaharwār, according to Dr. Hoernle,
is connected with the Sanskrit root gah, and has the sense of ‘dwellers in
caves or deep jungle.’7 The origin of the Gaharwārs is of interest in the
Central Provinces, because it is from them that the Bundela clan of Saugor
and Bundelkhand is probably descended.8

The Gaharwārs, Mr. Crooke states, now hold a high rank among Rājpūt
septs; they give daughters to the Baghel, Chandel and Bisen, and take
brides of the Bais, Gautam, Chauhān, Parihār and other clans. The
Gaharwārs are found in small numbers in the Central Provinces, chiefly in
the Chhattīsgarh Districts and Feudatory States.

1 Early History of India, 3rd edition, p. 391.

2 Early History of India, 3rd edition, p. 385.
3 Tribes and Castes, art. Gaharwār.

Page 555

4 Tribes and Castes, i. p. 75.

5 Supplementary Glossary, p. 33.
6 Rājasthān, i. p. 105.

7 Quoted in Mr. Crooke’s article on Gaharwār.
8 See art. Rājpūt, Bundela.

Page 556

Rājpūt, Gaur
Rājpūt, Gaur, Chamar Gaur.—Colonel Tod remarks of this tribe: “The
Gaur tribe was once respected in Rājasthān, though it never there attained to
any considerable eminence. The ancient kings of Bengal were of this race,
and gave their name to the capital, Lakhnauti.” This town in Bengal, and the
kingdom of which it was the capital, were known as Ganda, and it has been
conjectured that the Gaur Brāhmans and Rājpūts were named after it. Sir
H.M. Elliot and Mr. Crooke, however, point out that the home of the Gaur
Brāhmans and Rājpūts and a cultivating caste, the Gaur Tāgas, is in the
centre and west of the United Provinces, far removed from Bengal; the
Gaur Brāhmans now reside principally in the Meerut Division, and between
them and Bengal is the home of the Kanaujia Brāhmans. General
Cunningham suggests that the country comprised in the present Gonda
District round the old town of Sravāsti, was formerly known as Gauda, and
was hence the origin of the caste name.1 The derivation from Gaur in
Bengal is perhaps, however, more probable, as the name was best known in
connection with this tract. The Gaur Rājpūts do not make much figure in
history. “Repeated mention of them is found in the wars of Prithwi Rāj as
leaders of considerable renown, one of whom founded a small state in the
centre of India. This survived through seven centuries of Mogul
domination, till it at length fell a prey indirectly to the successes of the
British over the Marāthas, when Sindhia in 1809 annihilated the power of
the Gaur and took possession of his capital, Supur.”2

In the United Provinces the Gaur Rājpūts are divided into three groups, the
Bāhman, or Brāhman, the Bhāt, and the Chamār Gaur. Of these the Chamār
Gaur, curiously enough appear to rank the highest, which is accounted for
by the following story: When trouble fell upon the Gaur family, one of their
ladies, far advanced in pregnancy, took refuge in a Chamār’s house, and
was so grateful to him for his disinterested protection that she promised to
call her child by his name. The Bhāts and Brāhmans, to whom the others
fled, do not appear to have shown a like chivalry, and hence, strange as it

Page 557

may appear, the subdivisions called after their name rank below the Chamār
Gaur.3 The names of the subsepts indicate that this clan of Rājpūts is
probably of mixed origin. If the Brāhman subsept is descended from
Brāhmans, it would be only one of several probable cases of Rājpūt clans
originating from this caste. As regards the Bhāt subcaste, the Chārans or
Bhāts of Rājputāna are admittedly Rājpūts, and there is therefore nothing
curious in finding a Bhāt subsection in a Rājpūt clan. What the real origin
of the Chamār Gaurs was is difficult to surmise. The Chamār Gaur is now a
separate clan, and its members intermarry with the other Gaur Rājpūts,
affording an instance of the subdivision of clans. In the Central Provinces
the greater number of the persons returned as Gaur Rājpūts really belong to
a group known as Gorai, who are considered to be the descendants of
widows or kept women in the Gaur clan, and marry among themselves.
They should really therefore be considered a separate caste, and not
members of the Rājpūt caste proper. In the United Provinces the Gaurs rank
with the good Rājpūt clans. In the Central Provinces the Gaur and Chamār-
Gaur clans are returned from most Districts of the Jubbulpore and Nerbudda
divisions, and also in considerable numbers from Bhandāra.

1 Quoted in Mr. Crooke’s article Gaur Brāhman.
2 Rajasthān, i. p. 105.

3 Supplemental Glossary, s.v.

Page 558

Rājpūt, Haihaya
Rājpūt, Haihaya, Haihaivansi, Kālaehuri.—This well-known historical
clan of the Central Provinces is not included among the thirty-six royal
races, and Colonel Tod gives no information about them. The name Haihaya
is stated to be a corruption of Ahihaya, which means snake-horse, the
legend being that the first ancestor of the clan was the issue of a snake and a
mare. Haihaivansi signifies descendants of the horse. Colonel Tod states
that the first capital of the Indu or lunar race was at Mahesvati on the
Nerbudda, still existing as Maheshwar, and was founded by Sahasra Arjuna
of the Haihaya tribe.1 This Arjuna of the thousand arms was one of the
Pāndava brothers, and it may be noted that the Ratanpur Haihaivansis still
have a story of their first ancestor stealing a horse from Arjuna, and a
consequent visit of Arjuna and Krishna to Ratanpur for its recovery. Since
the Haihayas also claim descent from a snake and are of the lunar race, it
seems not unlikely that they may have belonged to one of the Scythian or
Tartar tribes, the Sākas or Yueh-chi, who invaded India shortly after the
commencement of the Christian era, as it has been conjectured that the
other lunar Rājpūt clans worshipping or claiming descent from a snake
originated from these tribes. The Haihaivansis or Kālachuris became
dominant in the Nerbudda valley about the sixth century, their earliest
inscription being dated A.D. 580. Their capital was moved to Tripura or
Tewar near Jubbulpore about A.D. 900, and from here they appear to have
governed an extensive territory for about 300 years, and were frequently
engaged in war with the adjoining kingdoms, the Chandels of Mahoba, the
Panwārs of Mālwa, and the Chalukyas of the south. One king,
Gangeyadeva, appears even to have aspired to become the paramount
power in northern India, and his sovereignty was recognised in distant
Tirhūt. Gangeyadeva was fond of residing at the foot of the holy fig-tree of
Prayāga (Allahābād), and eventually found salvation there with his hundred
wives. From about A.D. 1100 the power of the Kālachuri or Haihaya
princes began to decline, and their last inscription is dated A.D. 1196. It is
probable that they were subverted by the Gond kings of Garha-Mandla, the

Page 559

first of whom, Jadurai, appears to have been in the service of the Kālachuri
king, and subsequently with the aid of a dismissed minister to have
supplanted his former-master.2 The kingdom of the Kālachuri or Haihaya
kings was known as Chedi, and, according to Mr. V.A. Smith, corresponded
more or less roughly to the present area of the Central Provinces.3

In about the tenth century a member of the reigning family of Tripura was
appointed viceroy of some territories in Chhattīsgarh, and two or three
generations afterwards his family became practically independent of the
parent house, and established their own capital at Ratanpur in Bilāspur
District (A.D. 1050). This state was known as Dakshin or southern Kosāla.
During the twelfth century its importance rapidly increased, partly no doubt
on the ruins of the Jubbulpore kingdom, until the influence of the Ratanpur
princes, Ratnadeva II. and Prithwideva II., may be said to have extended
from Amarkantak to beyond the Godāvari, and from the confines of Berār
in the west to the boundaries of Orissa in the east.4 The Ratanpur kingdom
of Chedi or Dakshin Kosāla was the only one of the Rājpūt states in the
Central Provinces which escaped subversion by the Gonds, and it enjoyed a
comparatively tranquil existence till A.D. 1740, when Ratanpur fell to the
Marāthas almost without striking a blow. “The only surviving
representative of the Haihayas of Ratanpur,” Mr. Wills states,5 “is a quite
simple-minded Rājpūt who lives at Bargaon in Raipur District. He
represents the junior or Raipur branch of the family, and holds five villages
which were given him revenue-free by the Marāthas for his maintenance.
The mālguzār of Senduras claims descent from the Ratanpur family, but his
pretensions are doubtful. He enjoys no privileges such as those of the
Bargaon Thākur, to whom presents are still made when he visits the chiefs
who were once subordinate to his ancient house.” In the Ballia District of
the United Provinces6 are some Hayobans Rājpūts who claim descent from
the Ratanpur kings. Chandra Got, a cadet of this house, is said to have
migrated northwards in A.D. 8507 and settled in the Sāran District on the
Ganges, where he waged successful war with the aboriginal Cheros.
Subsequently one of his descendants violated a Brāhman woman called
Maheni of the house of his Purohit or family priest, who burnt herself to
death, and is still locally worshipped. After this tragedy the Hayobans

Page 560

Rājpūts left Sāran and settled in Ballia. Colonel Tod states that, “A small
branch of these ancient Haihayas yet exist in the country of the Nerbudda,
near the very top of the valley, at Sohāgpur in Baghelkhand, aware of their
ancient lineage, and, though few in number, are still celebrated for their
valour.”8 This Sohāgpur must apparently be the Sohāgpur tahsīl of Rewah,
ceded from Mandla after the Mutiny.

1 Rajasthān, i. p. 36.
2 The above notice of the Kālachuri or Haihaya dynasty of Tripura is taken from the detailed
account in the Jubbulpore District Gazetteer, pp. 42–47, compiled by Mr. A.E. Nelson, C.S.,
and Rai Bahādur Hīra Lāl.

3 Early History of India, 3rd edition, p. 390. This, however, does not only refer to the Jubbulpore
branch, whose territories did not probably include the south and east of the present Central
Provinces, but includes also the country over which the Ratanpur kings subsequently extended their
separate jurisdiction.
4 Bilāspur District Gazetteer, chap. ii., in which a full and interesting account of the Ratanpur
kingdom is given by Mr. C.U. Wills, C.S.

5 Ibidem, p. 49.
6 Mr. Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, art. Hayobans.

7 The date is too early, as is usual in these traditions. Though the Haihaivansis only founded
Ratanpur about A.D. 1050, their own legends put it ten centuries earlier.
8 Rajasthān, i. p. 36.

Page 561

Rājpūt, Hūna
Rājpūt, Hūna, Hoon.—This clan retains the name and memory of the Hun
barbarian hordes, who invaded India at or near the epoch of their incursions
into Europe. It is practically extinct; but in his Western India Colonel Tod
records the discovery of a few families of Hūnas in Baroda State: “At a
small village opposite Ometa I discovered a few huts of Huns, still existing
under the ancient name of Hoon, by which they are known to Hindu history.
There are said to be three or four families of them at the village of Trisavi,
three kos from Baroda, and although neither feature nor complexion
indicate much relation to the Tartar-visaged Hun, we may ascribe the
change to climate and admixture of blood, as there is little doubt that they
are descended from these invaders, who established a sovereignty on the
Indus in the second and sixth centuries of the Christian era, and became so
incorporated with the Rājpūt population as to obtain a place among the
thirty-six royal races of India, together with the Gete, the Kāthi, and other
tribes of the Sacae from Central Asia, whose descendants still occupy the
land of the sun-worshipping Saura or Chaura, no doubt one of the same
race.”

Page 562

Page 563

Rājpūt, Kachhwāha
Rājpūt, Kachhwāha, Cutchwāha—A celebrated clan of Rājpūts included
among the thirty-six royal races, to which the Mahārājas of the important
states of Amber or Jaipur and Alwar belong. They are of the solar race and
claim descent from Kash, the second son of the great king Rāma of Ajodhia,
the incarnation of Vishnu. Their original seat, according to tradition, was
Rohtās on the Son river, and another of their famous progenitors was Rāja
Nal, who migrated from Rohtās and founded Narwar.1 The town of Damoh
in the Central Provinces is supposed to be named after Damyanti, Rāja
Nal’s wife. According to General Cunningham the name Kachhwāha is an
abbreviation of Kachhaha-ghāta or tortoise-killer. The earliest appearance
of the Kachhwāha Rājpūts in authentic history is in the tenth century, when
a chief of the clan captured Gwalior from the Parihār-Gūjar kings of Kanauj
and established himself there. His dynasty had an independent existence till
A.D. 1128, when it became tributary to the Chandel kings of Mahoba.2 The
last prince of Gwalior was Tejkaran, called Dūlha Rai or the bridegroom
prince, and he received from his father-in-law the district of Daora in the
present Jaipur State, where he settled. In 1150 one of his successors wrested
Amber from the Mīnas and made it his capital. The Amber State from the
first acknowledged the supremacy of the Mughal emperors, and the chief of
the period gave his daughter in marriage to Akbar. This chief’s son,
Bhagwān Dās, is said to have saved Akbar’s life at the battle of Sarnāl.
Bhagwān Dās gave a daughter to Jahāngīr, and his adopted son, Mān Singh,
the next chief, was one of the most conspicuous of the Mughal Generals,
and at different periods was governor of Kābul, Bengal, Bihār and the
Deccan. The next chief of note, Jai Singh I., appears in all the wars of
Aurāngzeb in the Deccan. He was commander of 6000 horse, and captured
Sivaji, the celebrated founder of the Marātha power. The present city of
Jaipur was founded by a subsequent chief, Jai Singh II., in 1728. During the
Mutiny the Mahārāja of Jaipur placed all his military power at the disposal
of the Political Agent, and in every way assisted the British Government. At

Page 564

the Durbar of 1877 his salute was raised to 21 guns. Jaipur, one of the
largest states in Rājputāna, has an area of nearly 16,000 square miles, and a
population of 2½ million persons. The Alwar State was founded about 1776
by Pratāp Singh, a descendant of a prince of the Jaipur house, who had
separated from it three centuries before. It has an area of 3000 square miles
and a population of nearly a million.3 In Colonel Tod’s time the Kachhwāha
chiefs in memory of their descent from Rāma, the incarnation of the sun,
celebrated with great solemnity the annual feast of the sun. On this occasion
a stately car called the chariot of the sun was brought from Rāma’s temple,
and the Mahārāja ascending into it perambulated his capital. The images of
Rāma and Siva were carried with the army both in Alwar and Jaipur. The
banner of Amber was always called the Pānchranga or five-coloured flag,
and is frequently mentioned in the traditions of the Rājpūt bards. But it does
not seem to be stated what the five colours were. Some of the finest soldiers
in the old Sepoy army were Kachhwāha Rājpūts. The Kachhwāhas are
fairly numerous in the United Provinces and rank with the highest Rājpūt
clans.4 In the Central Provinces they are found principally in the Saugor,
Hoshangābād and Nimār Districts.

1 Rajasthān, ii. p. 319.
2 Early History of India, 3rd edition, p. 381.

3 The above information is taken from the new Imperial Gazetteer, articles Jaipur and Alwar
States.
4 Mr. Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, art. Kachhwāha.

Page 565

Rājpūt, Nāgvansi
Rājpūt, Nāgvansi.—This clan are considered to be the descendants of the
Tāk or Takshac, which is one of the thirty-six royal races, and was
considered by Colonel Tod to be of Scythian origin. The Takshac were also
snake-worshippers. “Nāga and Takshac are synonymous appellations in
Sanskrit for the snake, and the Takshac is the celebrated Nāgvansa of the
early heroic history of India. The Mahābhārat describes in its usual
allegorical style the war between the Pāndus of Indraprestha and the
Takshacs of the north. Parikhīta, a prince on the Pāndu side, was
assassinated by the Takshac, and his son and successor, Janamejaya,
avenged his death and made a bonfire of 20,000 snakes.”1 This allegory is
supposed to have represented the warfare of the Aryan races against the
Sākas or Scythians. The Tāk or Takshac would be one of the clans held to
be derived from the earlier invading tribes from Central Asia, and of the
lunar race. The Tāk are scarcely known in authentic history, but the poet
Chand mentions the Tāk from Aser or Asīrgarh as one of the princes who
assembled at the summons of Prithwi Rāj of Delhi to fight against the
Muhammadans. In another place he is called Chatto the Tāk. Nothing more
is known of the Tāk clan unless the cultivating Tāga caste of northern India
is derived from them. But the Nāgvansi clan of Rājpūts, who profess to be
descended from them, is fairly numerous. Most of the Nāgvansis, however,
are probably in reality descended from landholders of the indigenous tribes
who have adopted the name of this clan, when they wished to claim rank as
Rājpūts. The change is rendered more easy by the fact that many of these
tribes have legends of their own, showing the descent of their ruling
families from snakes, the snake and tiger, owing to their deadly character,
being the two animals most commonly worshipped. Thus the landholding
section of the Kols or Mundas of Chota Nāgpur have a long legend2 of their
descent from a princess who married a snake in human form, and hence call
themselves Nāgvansi Rājpūts; and Dr. Buchanan states that the Nāgvansi
clan of Gorakhpur is similarly derived from the Chero tribe.3 In the Central

Page 566

Provinces the Nāgvansi Rājpūts number about 400 persons, nearly all of
whom are found in the Chhattīsgarh Districts and Feudatory States, and are
probably descendants of Kol or Munda landholding families.

1 Rājasthān, i. p. 94; Elliot’s Supplemental Glossary, art. Gaur Tāga.
2 See article on Kol.
3 Eastern India, ii. 461, quoted in Mr. Crooke’s art. Nāgvansi.

Page 567

Rājpūt, Nikumbh
Rājpūt, Nikumbh.—The Nikumbh is given as one of the thirty-six royal
races, but it is also the name of a branch of the Chauhāns, and it seems that,
as suggested by Sherring,1 it may be an offshoot from the great Chauhān
clan. The Nikumbh are said to have been given the title of Sirnet by an
emperor of Delhi, because they would not bow their heads on entering his
presence, and when he fixed a sword at the door some of them allowed their
necks to be cut through by the sword rather than bend the head. The term
Sirnet is supposed to mean headless. A Chauhān column with an inscription
of Rāja Bisal Deo was erected at Nigumbode, a place of pilgrimage on the
Jumna, a few miles below Delhi, and it seems a possible conjecture that the
Nikumbhs may have obtained their name from this place.2 Mr. Crooke,
however, takes the Nikumbh to be a separate clan. The foundation of most
of the old forts and cities in Alwar and northern Jaipur is ascribed to them,
and two of their inscriptions of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries have
been discovered in Khāndesh. In northern India some of them are now
known as Rāghuvansi.3 They are chiefly found in the Hoshangābād and
Nimār Districts, and may be connected with the Rāghuvansi or Rāghwi
caste of these Provinces.

1 Tribes and Castes, vol. i. art. Nikumbh.

2 Rājasthān, ii. p. 417.
3 Mr. Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, art. Nikumbh.

Page 568

Rājpūt, Pāik
Rājpūt, Pāik.—This term means a foot-soldier, and is returned from the
northern Districts. It belongs to a class of men formerly maintained as a
militia by zamīndārs and landholders for the purpose of collecting their
revenue and maintaining order. They were probably employed in much the
same manner in the Central Provinces as in Bengal, where Buchanan thus
describes them:1 “In order to protect the money of landowners and convey
it from place to place, and also, as it is alleged, to enforce orders, two kinds
of guards are kept. One body called Burkandāz, commanded by Duffadārs
and Jemādārs, seems to be a more recent establishment The other called
Pāik, commanded by Mīrdhas and Sirdārs, are the remains of the militia of
the Bengal kingdom. Both seem to have constituted the foot-soldiers whose
number makes such a formidable appearance in the Ain-i-Akbari. These
unwieldy establishments seem to have been formed when the Government
collected rent immediately from the farmer and cultivator, and when the
same persons managed not only the collections but the police and a great
part of the judicial department. This vast number of armed men, more
especially the latter, formed the infantry of the Mughal Government, and
were continued under the zamīndārs, who were anxious to have as many
armed men as possible to support them in their depredations. And these
establishments formed no charge, as they lived on lands which the zamīndār
did not bring to account.” The Pāiks are thus a small caste formed from
military service like the Khandaits or swordsmen of Orissa, and are no
doubt recruited from all sections of the population. They have no claim to
be considered as Rājpūts.

1 Eastern India, ii. p. 919.

Page 569

Rājpūt, Parihār
Rājpūt, Parihār.—This clan was one of the four Agnikulas or fire-born.
Their founder was the first to issue from the fire-fountain, but he had not a
warrior’s mien. The Brāhmans placed him as guardian of the gate, and
hence his name, Prithi-ha-dwāra of which Parihār is supposed to be a
corruption1. Like the Chauhāns and Solankis the Parihār clan is held to have
originated from the Gurjara or Gūjar invaders who came with the white
Huns in the fifth and sixth centuries, and they were one of the first of the
Gūjar Rājpūt clans to emerge into prominence. They were dominant in
Bundelkhand before the Chandels, their last chieftain having been
overthrown by a Chandel prince in A.D. 8312. A Parihār-Gūjar chieftain,
whose capital was at Bhinmāl in Rājputāna, conquered the king of Kanauj,
the ruler of what remained of the dominions of the great Harsha Vārdhana,
and established himself there about A.D. 8163. Kanauj was then held by
Gūjar-Parihār kings till about 1090, when it was seized by Chandradeva of
the Gaharwār Rājpūt clan. The Parihār rulers were thus subverted by the
Gaharwārs and Chandels, both of whom are thought to be derived from the
Bhars or other aboriginal tribes, and these events appear to have been in the
nature of a rising of the aristocratic section of the indigenous residents
against the Gūjar rulers, by whom they had been conquered and perhaps
taught the trade of arms. After this period the Parihārs are of little
importance. They appear to have retired to Rājputāna, as Colonel Tod states
that Mundore, five miles north of Jodhpur, was their headquarters until it
was taken by the Rāhtors. The walls of the ruined fortress of Mundore are
built of enormous square masses of stone without cement, and attest both its
antiquity and its former strength4. The Parihārs are scattered over
Rājputāna, and a colony of them on the Chambal was characterised as the
most notorious body of thieves in the annals of Thug history5. Similarly in
Etāwah they are said to be a peculiarly lawless and desperate community6.
The Parihār Rājpūts rank with the leading clans and intermarry with them.

Page 570

In the Central Provinces they are found principally in Saugor, Damoh and
Jubbulpore.

1 Rājasthān, i. p. 86.
2 Early History of India, 3rd edition, p. 390.
3 Ibidem, pp. 378, 379.

4 Rājasthān, i. p. 91.
5 Ibidem.

6 Mr. Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, art. Parihār.

Page 571

Rājpūt, Rāthor
Rājpūt, Rāthor, Rāthaur.—The Rāthor of Jodhpur or Mārwār is one of the
most famous clans of Rājpūts, and that which is most widely dominant at
the present time, including as it does the Rājas of Jodhpur, Bikaner, Ratlām,
Kishengarh and Idar, as well as several smaller states. The origin of the
Rāthor clan is uncertain. Colonel Tod states that they claim to be of the
solar race, but by the bards of the race are denied this honour; and though
descended from Kash, the second son of Rāma, are held to be the offspring
of one of his progeny, Kashyap, by the daughter of a Dait (Titan). The view
was formerly held that the dynasty which wrested Kanauj from the
descendants of Harsha Vārdhana, and held it from A.D. 810 to 1090, until
subverted by the Gaharwārs, were Rāthors, but proof has now been
obtained that they were really Parihār-Gūjars. Mr. Smith suggests that after
the destruction of Kanauj by the Muhammadans under Shihāb-ud-Dīn
Ghori in A.D. 1193 the Gaharwār clan, whose kings had conquered it in
1090 and reigned there for a century, migrated to the deserts of Mārwār in
Rājputāna, where they settled and became known as Rāthors.1 It has also
been generally held that the Rāshtrakūta dynasty of Nāsik and Mālkhed in
the Deccan which reigned from A.D. 753 to 973, and built the Kailāsa
temples at Ellora were Rāthors, but Mr. Smith states that there is no
evidence of any social connection between the Rāshtrakūtas and Rāthors.2
At any rate Siāhji, the grandson or nephew of Jai Chand, the last king of
Kanauj, who had been drowned in the Ganges while attempting to escape,
accomplished with about 200 followers—the wreck of his vassalage—the
pilgrimage to Dwārka in Gujarāt. He then sought in the sands and deserts of
Rājputāna a second line of defence against the advancing wave of
Muhammadan invasion, and planted the standard of the Rāthors among the
sandhills of the Luni in 1212. This, however, was not the first settlement of
the Rāthors in Rājputāna, for an inscription, dated A.D. 997, among the
ruins of the ancient city of Hathūndi or Hastikūndi, near Bāli in Jodhpur
State, tells of five Rāthor Rājas who ruled there early in the tenth century,

Page 572

and this fact shows that the name Rāthor is really much older than the date
of the fall of Kanauj.3

In 1381 Siāhji’s tenth successor, Rao Chonda, took Mundore from a Parihār
chief, and made his possession secure by marrying the latter’s daughter. A
subsequent chief, Rao Jodha, laid the foundation of Jodhpur in 1459, and
transferred thither the seat of government. The site of Jodhpur was selected
on a peak known as Joda-gīr, or the hill of strife, four miles distant from
Mundore on a crest of the range overlooking the expanse of the desert
plains of Mārwār. The position for the new city was chosen at the bidding
of a forest ascetic, and was excellently adapted for defence, but had no good
water-supply.4 Joda had fourteen sons, of whom the sixth, Bīka, was the
founder of the Bikaner state. Rāja Sur Singh (1595–1620) was one of
Akbar’s greatest generals, and the emperor Jahāngīr buckled the sword on
to his son Gaj Singh with his own hands. Gaj Singh, the next Rāja (1620–
1635), was appointed viceroy of the Deccan, as was his successor, Jaswant
Singh, under Aurāngzeb. The Mughal Emperors, Colonel Tod remarks,
were indebted for half their conquests to the Lākh Tulwār Rāhtorān, the
hundred thousand swords which the Rāthors boasted that they could
muster.5 On another occasion, when Jahāngīr successfully appealed to the
Rājpūts for support against his rebel son Khusru, he was so pleased with the
zeal of the Rāthor prince, Rāja Gaj Singh, that he not only took the latter’s
hand, but kissed it,6 perhaps an unprecedented honour. But the constant
absence from his home on service in distant parts of the empire was so
distasteful to Rāja Sur Singh that, when dying in the Deccan, he ordered a
pillar to be erected on his grave containing his curse upon any of his race
who should cross the Nerbudda. The pomp of imperial greatness or the
sunshine of court favour was as nothing with the Rāthor chiefs, Colonel Tod
says, when weighed against the exercise of their influence within their own
cherished patrimony. The simple fare of the desert was dearer to the Rāthor
than all the luxuries of the imperial banquet, which he turned from in
disgust to the recollection of the green pulse of Mundore, or his favourite
rabi or maize porridge, the prime dish of the Rāthor.7 The Rāthor princes
have been not less ready in placing themselves and the forces of their States
at the disposal of the British Government, and the latest and perhaps most

Page 573

brilliant example of their loyalty occurred during 1914, when the veteran
Sir Partāp Singh of Idar insisted on proceeding to the front against
Germany, though over seventy years of age, and was accompanied by his
nephew, a boy of sixteen.

The Ratlām State was founded by Ratan Singh, a grandson of Rāja Udai
Singh of Jodhpur, who was born about 1618, and obtained it as a grant for
good service against the Usbegs at Kandahār and the Persians in Khorasān
about 1651–52. Kishangarh was founded by Kishan Singh, a son of the
same Rāja Udai Singh, who obtained a grant of territory from Akbar about
1611. Idar State in Gujarāt has, according to its traditions, been held by
Rāthor princes from a very early period. Jodhpur State is the largest in
Rājputāna, with an area of 35,000 square miles, and a population of two
million. The Mahārāja is entitled to a salute of twenty-one guns. A great
part of the State is a sandy desert, and its older name of Mārwār is,
according to Colonel Tod, a corruption of Mārusthān, or the region of death.
In the Central Provinces the Rāthor Rājpūts number about 6000 persons,
and are found mainly in the Saugor, Jubbulpore, Narsinghpur and
Hoshangābād Districts. The census statistics include about 5000 persons
enumerated in Mandla and Bilaspur, nearly all of whom are really Rāthor
Telis.

1 Early History of India, 3rd edition, p. 389.
2 Ibidem, p. 413.
3 Imperial Gazetteer, art. Bali.

4 Rajasthān, ii. pp. 16, 17.
5 Ibidem, i. p. 81.
6 Ibidem, ii. p. 37.
7 Ibidem, ii. p. 35.

Page 574

Rājpūt, Sesodia
Rājpūt, Sesodia, Gahlot, Ahāria.—The Gahlot or Sesodia is generally
admitted to be the premier Rājpūt clan. Their chief is described by the bards
as “The Sūryavānsi Rāna, of royal race, Lord of Chitor, the ornament of the
thirty-six royal races.” The Sesodias claim descent from the sun, through
Loh, the eldest son of the divine Rāma of Ajodhia. In token of their ancestry
the royal banner of Mewār consisted of a golden sun on a crimson field.
Loh is supposed to have founded Lahore. His descendants migrated to
Saurāshtra or Kāthiāwār, where they settled at Vidurbha or Balabhi, the
capital of the Valabhi dynasty. The last king of Valabhi was Silāditya, who
was killed by an invasion of barbarians, and his posthumous son,
Gohāditya, ruled in Idar and the hilly country in the south-west of Mewār.
From him the clan took its name of Gohelot or Gahlot. Mr. D.R.
Bhandarkar, however, from a detailed examination of the inscriptions
relating to the Sesodias, arrives at the conclusion that the founders of the
line were Nāgar Brāhmans from Vadnagar in Gujarāt, the first of the line
being one Guhadatta, from which the clan takes its name of Gahlot1 The
family were also connected with the ruling princes of Valabhi. Mr.
Bhandarkar thinks that the Valabhi princes, and also the Nāgar Brāhmans,
belonged to the Maitraka tribe, who, like the Gūjars, were allied to the
Huns, and entered India in the fifth or sixth century. Mr. Bhandarkar’s
account really agrees quite closely with the traditions of the Sesodia bards
themselves, except that he considers Guhadatta to have been a Nāgar
Brāhman of Valabhi, and descended from the Maitrakas, a race allied to the
Huns, while the bards say that he was a descendant of the Aryan Kshatriyas
of Ajodhia, who migrated to Surat and established the Valabhi kingdom.
The earliest prince of the Gahlot dynasty for whom a date has been obtained
is Sīla, A.D. 646, and he was fifth in descent from Guhadatta, who may
therefore be placed in the first part of the sixth century. Bāpa, the founder of
the Gahlot clan in Mewār, was, according to tradition, sixth in descent from
Gohāditya, and he had his capital at Nāgda, a few miles to the north of

Page 575

Udaipur city.2 A tradition quoted by Mr. Bhandarkar states that Bāpa was
the son of Grahadāta. He succeeded in propitiating the god Siva. One day
the king of Chitor died and left no heir to his throne. It was decided that
whoever would be garlanded by a certain elephant would be placed on the
throne. Bāpa was present on the occasion, and the elephant put the garland
round his neck not only once, but thrice. Bāpa was thus seated on the
throne. One day he was suffering from some eye-disease. A physician
mixed a certain medicine in alcoholic liquor and applied it to his eyes,
which were speedily cured. Bāpa afterwards inquired what the medicine
was, and learnt the truth. He trembled like a reed and said, “I am a
Brāhman, and you have given me medicine mixed in liquor. I have lost my
caste,” So saying he drank molten lead (sīsa), and forthwith died, and hence
arose the family name Sesodia.3 This story, current in Rājputāna, supports
Mr. Bhandarkar’s view of the Brāhman origin of the clan. According to
tradition Bāpa went to Chitor, then held by the Mori or Prāmara Rājpūts, to
seek his fortune, and was appointed to lead the Chitor forces against the
Muhammadans on their first invasion of India.4 After defeating and
expelling them he ousted the Mori ruler and established himself at Chitor,
which has since been the capital of the Sesodias. The name Sesodia is really
derived from Sesoda, the residence of a subsequent chief Rāhup, who
captured Mundore and was the first to bear the title of Rāna of Mewār.
Similarly Ahāria is another local name from Ahār, a place in Mewār, which
was given to the clan. They were also known as Rāghuvansi, or of the race
of king Rāghu, the ancestor of the divine Rāma. The Rāghuvansis of the
Central Provinces, an impure caste of Rājpūt origin, are treated in a separate
article, but it is not known whether they were derived from the Sesodias.
From the fourteenth century the chronicles of the Sesodias contain many
instances of Rājpūt courage and devotion. Chitor was sacked three times
before the capital was removed to Udaipur, first by Ala-ul-Din Khilji in
1303, next by Bahādur Shāh, the Muhammadan king of Gujarāt in 1534,
and lastly by Akbar in 1567. These events were known as Sāka or
massacres of the clan. On each occasion the women of the garrison
performed the Johar or general immolation by fire, while the men sallied
forth, clad in their saffron-coloured robes and inspired by bhāng, to die
sword in hand against the foe. At the first sack the goddess of the clan

Page 576

appeared in a dream to the Rāna and demanded the lives of twelve of its
chiefs as a condition of its preservation. His eleven sons were in their turn
crowned as chief, each ruling for three days, while on the fourth he sallied
out and fell in battle.5 Lastly, the Rāna devoted himself in order that his
favourite son Ajeysi might be spared and might perpetuate the clan. At the
second sack 32,000 were slain, and at the third 30,000. Finally Aurāngzeb
destroyed the temples and idols at Chitor, and only its ruins remain.
Udaipur city was founded in 1559. The Sesodias resisted the
Muhammadans for long, and several times defeated them. Udai Singh, the
founder of Udaipur, abandoned his capital and fled to the hills, whence he
caused his own territory to be laid waste, with the object of impeding the
imperial forces. Of this period it is recorded that the Rānas were from father
to son in outlawry against the emperor, and that sovereign had carried away
the doors of the gate of Chitor, and had set them up in Delhi. Fifty-two rājas
and chiefs had perished in the struggle, and the Rāna in his trouble lay at
nights on a counterpane spread on the ground, and neither slept in his bed
nor shaved his hair; and if he perchance broke his fast, had nothing better
with which to satisfy it than beans baked in an earthen pot. For this reason it
is that certain practices are to this day observed at Udaipur. A counterpane
is spread below the Rāna’s bed, and his head remains unshaven and baked
beans are daily laid upon his plate.6 A custom of perhaps somewhat similar
origin is that in this clan man and wife take food together, and the wife does
not wait till her husband has finished. It is said that the Sesodia Rājpūts are
the only caste in India among whom this rule prevails, and it may have been
due to the fact that they had to eat together in haste when occasion offered
during this period of guerilla warfare.

In 1614 Rāna Amar Singh, recognising that further opposition was
hopeless, made his submission to the emperor, on the condition that he
should never have to present himself in person but might send his two sons
in his place. This stipulation being accepted, the heir-apparent Karan Singh
proceeded to Ajmer where he was magnanimously treated by Jahāngīr and
shortly afterwards the imperial troops were withdrawn from Chitor. It is the
pride of the Udaipur house that it never gave a daughter in marriage to any
of the Musalmān emperors, and for many years ceased to intermarry with
other Rājpūt families who had formed such alliances. But Amar Singh II.

Page 577

(1698–1710) made a league with the Mahārājas of Jodhpur and Jaipur for
mutual protection against the Muhammadans; and it was one of the
conditions of the compact that the latter chiefs should regain the privilege
of marriage with the Udaipur family which had been suspended since they
had given daughters in marriage to the emperors. But the Rāna
unfortunately added a proviso that the son of an Udaipur princess should
succeed to the Jodhpur or Jaipur States in preference to any elder son by
another mother. The quarrels to which this stipulation gave rise led to the
conquest of the country by the Marāthas, at whose hands Mewār suffered
more cruel devastation than it had ever been subjected to by the
Muhammadans. Ruinous war also ensued between Jodhpur and Jaipur for
the hand of the famous Udaipur princess Kishen Kumāri at the time when
Rājputāna was being devastated by the Marāthas and Pindāris; and the
quarrel was only settled by the voluntary death of the object of contention,
who, after the kinsman sent to slay her had recoiled before her young
beauty and innocence, willingly drank the draught of opium four times
administered before the fatal result could be produced.7

The Mahārāna of Udaipur is entitled to a salute of nineteen guns. The
Udaipur State has an area of nearly 13,000 square miles and a population of
about a million persons. Besides Udaipur three minor states, Partābgarh,
Dungarpur and Banswāra, are held by members of the Sesodia clan. In the
Central Provinces the Sesodias numbered nearly 2000 persons in 1911,
being mainly found in the districts of the Nerbudda Division.

1 J.A.S.B. (1909), vol. v. p. 167.
2 Imperial Gazetteer, loc. cit.

3 Bhandarkar, loc. cit. p. 180.
4 The following extracts from the history of the clan are mainly taken from the article on Udaipur
State in the Imperial Gazetteer.

5 Rājasthān, pp. 222, 223.
6 Forbes, Rāsmala i. p. 400.

Page 578

7 Rajasthān i. pp, 398, 399. The death of the young princess was mainly the work of Amīr Khān
Pindāri who brought pressure on the Rāna to consent to it in order to save his state.

Page 579

Rājpūt, Solankhi
Rājpūt, Solankhi, Solanki, Chalukya.—This clan was one of the
Agnikula or fire-born, and are hence considered to have probably been
Gurjaras or Gūjars. Their original name is said to have been Chaluka,
because they were formed in the palm (chalu) of the hand. They were not
much known in Rājputāna, but were very prominent in the Deccan. Here
they were generally called Chalukya, though in northern India the name
Solankhi is more common. As early as A.D. 350 Pulakesin I. made himself
master of the town of Vatapi, the modern Bādāmi In the Bijāpur District,
and founded a dynasty, which developed into the most powerful kingdom
south of the Nerbudda, and lasted for two centuries, when it was
overthrown by the Rāshtrakūtas1. Pulākesin II. of this Chalukya dynasty
successfully resisted an inroad of the great emperor Harsha Vardhana of
Kanauj, who aspired to the conquest of the whole of India. The Rāshtrakūta
kings governed for two centuries, and in A.D. 973 Taila or Tailapa II., a
scion of the old Chalukya stock, restored the family of his ancestors to its
former glory, and founded the dynasty known as that of the Chalukyas of
Kalyān, which lasted like that which it superseded for nearly two centuries
and a quarter, up to about A.D. 1190. In the tenth century apparently
another branch of the clan migrated from Rājputāna into Gujarāt and
established a new dynasty there, owing to which Gujarāt, which had
formerly been known as Lāta, obtained its present name2. The principal
king of this line was Sidh Rāj Solankhi, who is well known to tradition.
From these Chalukya or Solankhi rulers the Baghel clan arose, which
afterwards migrated to Rewah. The Solankhis are found in the United
Provinces, and a small number are returned from the Central Provinces,
belonging mainly to Hoshangābād and Nimār.

1 If the Chalukyas were in the Deccan in the fourth century they could not have originated from
the Hun and Gūjar invaders of the fifth and sixth centuries, but must have belonged to an earlier
horde.

Page 580

2 Some Problems of Ancient Indian History, by Dr. Rudolf Hoernle, J.R.A.S. (1905) pp. 1–14.

Page 581

Rājpūt, Somvansi
Rājpūt, Somvansi, Chandravansi.—These two are returned as separate
septs, though both names mean ‘Descendants of the moon.’ Colonel Tod
considers Sūrajvansi and Somvansi, or the descendants of the sun and moon
as the first two of the thirty-six royal clans, from which all the others were
evolved. But he gives no account of them, nor does it appear that they were
regularly recognised clans in Rājputāna. It is probable that both Somvansi
and Chandravansi, as well as Sūrajvansi and perhaps Nāgvansi
(Descendants of the snake) have served as convenient designations for
Rājpūts of illegitimate birth, or for landholding sections of the cultivating
castes and indigenous tribes when they aspired to become Rājpūts. Thus the
Sūrajvansis, and Somvansis of different parts of the country might be quite
different sets of people. There seems some reason for supposing that the
Somvansis of the United Provinces as described by Mr. Crooke are derived
from the Bhar tribe;1 in the Central Provinces a number of Somvansis and
Chandravansis are returned from the Feudatory States, and are probably
landholders who originally belonged to one of the forest tribes residing in
them. I have heard the name Somvansi applied to a boy who belonged to
the Baghel clan of Rājpūts, but he was of inferior status on account of his
mother being a remarried widow, or something of the kind.

1 Tribes and Castes, s.v.

Page 582

Rājpūt, Sūrajvansi
Rājpūt, Sūrajvansi.—The Sūrajvansi (Descendants of the Sun) is recorded
as the first of the thirty-six royal clans, but Colonel Tod gives no account of
it, and it does not seem to be known to history as a separate clan. Mr.
Crooke mentions an early tradition that the Sūrajvansis migrated from
Ajodhia to Gujarāt in A.D. 224, but this is scarcely likely to be authentic in
view, of the late dates now assigned for the origin of the important Rājpūt
clans. Sūrajvansi should properly be a generic term denoting any Rājpūt
belonging to a clan of the solar race, and it seems likely that it may at
different times have been adopted by Rājpūts who were no longer
recognised in their own clan, or by families of the cultivating castes or
indigenous tribes who aspired to become Rājpūts. Thus Mr. Crooke notes
that a large section of the Soiris (Savaras or Saonrs) have entirely
abandoned their own tribal name and call themselves Sūrajvansi Rājpūts;1
and the same thing has probably happened in other cases. In the Central
Provinces the Sūrajvansis belong mainly to Hoshangābād, and here they
form a separate caste, marrying among themselves and not with other
Rājpūt clans. Hence they would not be recognised as proper Rājpūts, and
are probably a promoted group of some cultivating caste.

1 Ibidem, art. Soiri.

Page 583

Rājpūt, Tomara
Rājpūt, Tomara, Tuar, Turtwar.—This clan is an ancient one, supposed
by Colonel Tod to be derived from the Yādavas or lunar race. The name is
said to come from tomar a club.1 The Tomara clan was considered to be a
very ancient one, and the great king Vikramāditya, whose reign was the
Hindu Golden Age, was held to have been sprung from it. These traditions
are, however, now discredited, as well as that of Delhi having been built by
a Tomara king, Anang Pāl I., in A.D. 733. Mr. V.A. Smith states that Delhi
was founded in 993–994, and Anangapāla, a Tomara king, built the Red
Fort about 1050. In 1052 he removed the celebrated iron pillar, on which
the eulogy of Chandragupta Vikramāditya is incised, from its original
position, probably at Mathura, and set it up in Delhi as an adjunct to a group
of temples from which the Muhammadans afterwards constructed the great
mosque.2 This act apparently led to the tradition that Vikramāditya had been
a Tomara, and also to a much longer historical antiquity being ascribed to
the clan than it really possessed. The Tomara rule at Delhi only lasted about
150 years, and in the middle of the twelfth century the town was taken by
Bisāl Deo, the Chauhān chieftain of Ajmer, whose successor, Prithwi Rāj,
reigned at Delhi, but was defeated and killed by the Muhammadans in A.D.
1192. Subsequently, perhaps in the reign of Ala-ud-Dīn Khilji, a Tomara
dynasty established itself at Gwalior, and one of their kings, Dungara Singh
(1425–1454), had executed the celebrated rock-sculptures of Gwalior.3 In
1518 Gwalior was taken by the Muhammadans, and the last Tomara king
reduced to the status of an ordinary jāgīrdār. The Tomara clan is numerous
in the Punjab country near Delhi, where it still possesses high rank, but in
the United Provinces it is not so much esteemed.4 No ruling chief now
belongs to this clan. In the Central Provinces the Tomaras or Tunwars
belong principally to the Hoshangābād District The zamīndārs of Bilāspur,
who were originally of the Tawar subcaste of the Kawar tribe, now also
claim to be Tomara Rājpūts on the strength of the similarity of the name.

Page 584

1 Mr Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, art. Tomara.

2 Early History of India, 3rd edition, p. 386.
3 Elliot, Supplemental Glossary, s.v.

4 Mr. Crooke’s Tribes, and Castes, art. Tomara.

Page 585

Rājpūt; Yādu
Rājpūt; Yādu, Yādava, Yādu-Bhatti, Jādon.1—The Yādus are a well-
known historical clan. Colonel Tod says that the Yādu was the most
illustrious of all the tribes of Ind, and became the patronymic of the
descendants of Buddha, progenitor of the lunar (Indu) race. It is not clear,
even according to legendary tradition, what, if any, connection the Yādus
had with Buddha, but Krishna is held to have been a prince of this tribe and
founded Dwārka in Gujarāt with them, in which locality he is afterwards
supposed to have been killed. Colonel Tod states that the Yādu after the
death of Krishna, and their expulsion from Dwārka and Delhi, the last
stronghold of their power, retired by Multān across the Indus, founded
Ghazni in Afghānistān, and peopled these countries even to Samārcand.
Again driven back on the Indus they obtained possession of the Punjab and
founded Salbhānpur. Thence expelled they retired across the Sutlej and
Gāra into the Indian deserts, where they founded Tannote, Derawāl and
Jaisalmer, the last in A.D. 1157. It has been suggested in the main article on
Rājpūt that the Yādus might have been the Sākas, who invaded India in the
second century A.D. This is only a speculation. At a later date a Yādava
kingdom existed in the Deccan, with its capital at Deogiri or Daulatābād
and its territory lying between that place and Nāsik.2 Mr. Smith states that
these Yādava kings were descendants of feudatory nobles of the Chalukya
kingdom, which embraced parts of western India and also Gujarāt. The
Yādu clan can scarcely, however, be a more recent one than the Chalukya,
as in that case it would not probably have been credited with having had
Krishna as its member. The Yādava dynasty only lasted from A.D. 1150 to
1318, when the last prince of the line, Harāpala, stirred up a revolt against
the Muhammadans to whom the king, his father-in-law, had submitted, and
being defeated, was flayed alive and decapitated. It is noticeable that the
Yādu-Bhatti Rājpūts of Jaisalmer claim descent from Sālivāhana, who
founded the Sāka era in A.D. 78, and it is believed that this era belonged to
the Sāka dynasty of Gujarāt, where, according to the tradition given above,

Page 586

the Yādus also settled. This point is not important, but so far as it goes
would favour the identification of the Sākas with the Yādavas.

The Bhatti branch of the Yādus claim descent from Bhāti, the grandson of
Sālivāhana. They have no legend of having come from Gujarāt, but they
had the title of Rāwal, which is used in Gujarāt, and also by the Sesodia
clan who came from there. The Bhattis are said to have arrived in Jaisalmer
about the middle of the eighth century, Jaisalmer city being founded much
later in A.D. 1183. Jaisalmer State, the third in Rājputāna, has an area of
16,000 square miles, most of which is desert, and a population of about
100,000 persons. The chief has the title of Mahārāwal and receives a salute
of fifteen guns. The Jareja Rājpūts of Sind and Cutch are another branch of
the Yādus who have largely intermarried with Muhammadans. They now
claim descent from Jāmshīd, the Persian hero, and on this account, Colonel
Tod states, the title of their rulers is Jām. They were formerly much
addicted to female infanticide. The name Yādu has in other parts of India
been corrupted into Jādon, and the class of Jādon Rājpūts is fairly numerous
in the United Provinces, and in some places is said to have become a caste,
its members marrying among themselves. This is also the case in the
Central Provinces, where they are known as Jādum, and have been treated
under that name in a separate article. The small State of Karauli in
Rājputāna is held by a Jādon chief.

1 See also article Jādum for a separate account of the local caste in the Central Provinces.

2 Early History of India, 3rd edition, p. 434.

Page 587

Rajwār
Rajwār.1—A low cultivating caste of Bihār and Chota Nāgpur, who are
probably an offshoot of the Bhuiyas. In 1911 a total of 25,000 Rajwārs were
returned in the Central Provinces, of whom 22,000 belong to the Sargūja
State recently transferred from Bengal. Another 2000 persons are shown in
Bilāspur, but these are Mowārs, an offshoot of the Rajwārs, who have taken
to the profession of gardening and have changed their name. They probably
rank a little higher than the bulk of the Rajwārs. “Traditionally,” Colonel
Dalton states, “the Rajwārs appear to connect themselves with the Bhuiyas;
but this is only in Bihār. The Rajwārs in Sargūja and the adjoining States
are peaceably disposed cultivators, who declare themselves to be fallen
Kshatriyas; they do not, however, conform to Hindu customs, and they are
skilled in a dance called Chailo, which I believe to be of Dravidian origin.
The Rajwārs of Bengal admit that they are the descendants of mixed unions
between Kurmis and Kols. They are looked upon as very impure by the
Hindus, who will not take water from their hands.” The Rajwārs of Bihār
told Buchanan that their ancestor was a certain Rishi, who had two sons.
From the elder were descended the Rajwārs, who became soldiers and
obtained their noble title; and from the younger the Musāhars, who were so
called from their practice of eating rats, which the Rajwārs rejected. The
Musāhars, as shown by Sir H. Risley, are probably Bhuiyas degraded to
servitude in Hindu villages, and this story confirms the Bhuiya origin of the
Rajwārs. In the Central Provinces the Bhuiyas have a subcaste called
Rajwār, which further supports this hypothesis, and in the absence of
evidence to the contrary it is reasonable to suppose that the Rajwārs are an
offshoot of the Bhuiyas, as they themselves say, in Bihār. The substitution
of Kols for Bhuiyas in Bengal need not cause much concern in view of the
great admixture of blood and confused nomenclature of all the Chota
Nāgpur tribes. In Bengal, where the Bhuiyas have settled in Hindu villages,
and according to the usual lot of the forest tribes who entered the Hindu
system have been degraded into the servile and impure caste of Musāhars,
the Rajwārs have shared their fate, and are also looked upon as impure. But

Page 588

in Chota Nāgpur the Bhuiyas have their own villages and live apart from
the Hindus, and here the Rajwārs, like the landholding branches of other
forest tribes, claim to be an inferior class of Rājpūts.

In Sargūja the caste have largely adopted Hindu customs. They abstain from
liquor, employ low-class Brāhmans as priests, and worship the Hindu
deities. When a man wishes to arrange a match for his son he takes a basket
of wheat-cakes and proceeding to the house of the girl’s father sets them
down outside. If the match is acceptable the girl’s mother comes and takes
the cakes into the house and the betrothal is then considered to be ratified.
At the wedding the bridegroom smears vermilion seven times on the parting
of the bride’s hair, and the bride’s younger sister then wipes a little of it off
with the end of the cloth. For this service she is paid a rupee by the
bridegroom. Divorce and the remarriage of widows are permitted. After the
birth of a child the mother is given neither food nor water for two whole
days; on the third day she gets only boiled water to drink and on the fourth
day receives some food. The period of impurity after a birth extends to
twelve days. When the navel-string drops it is carefully put away until the
next Dasahra, together with the child’s hair, which is cut on the sixth day.
On the Dasahra festival all the women of the village take them to a tank,
where a lotus plant is worshipped and anointed with oil and vermilion, and
the hair and navel-string are then buried at its roots. The dead are burned,
and the more pious keep the bones with a view to carrying them to the
Ganges or some other sacred river. Pending this, the bones are deposited in
the cow-house, and a lamp is kept burning in it every night so long as they
are there. The Rajwārs believe that every man has a soul or Prān, and they
think that the soul leaves the body, not only at death, but whenever he is
asleep or becomes unconscious owing to injury or illness. Dreams are the
adventures of the soul while wandering over the world apart from the body.
They think it very unlucky for a man to see his own reflection in water and
carefully avoid doing so.

1 Based on the accounts of Sir H. Risley and Colonel Dalton and a paper by Pandit G.L. Pāthak,
Superintendent, Korea State.

Page 589

Page 590

Rāmosi

1. General notice

Rāmosi, Rāmoshi.—A criminal tribe of the Bombay Presidency, of which
about 150 persons were returned from the Central Provinces and Berār in
1911. They belong to the western tract of the Satpūras adjoining Khāndesh.
The name is supposed to be a corruption of Rāmvansi, meaning ‘The
descendants of Rāma.’ They say1 that when Rāma, the hero of the
Rāmāyana, was driven from his kingdom by his step-mother Kaikeyi, he
went to the forest land south of the Nerbudda. His brother Bharat, who had
been raised to the throne, could not bear to part with Rāma, so he followed
him to the forest, began to do penance, and made friends with a rough but
kindly forest tribe. After Rāma’s restoration Bharat took two foresters with
him to Ajodhia (Oudh) and brought them to the notice of Rāma, who
appointed them village watchmen and allowed them to take his name. If this
is the correct derivation it may be compared with the name of Rāwanvansi
or Children of Rāwan, the opponent of Rāma, which is applied to the Gonds
of the Central Provinces. The Rāmosis appear to be a Hinduised caste
derived from the Bhīls or Kolis or a mixture of the two tribes. They were
formerly a well-known class of robbers and dacoits. The principal scenes of
their depredations were the western Ghāts, and an interesting description of
their methods is given by Captain Mackintosh in his account of the tribe.2
Some extracts from this are here reproduced.

Page 591

2. Methods of robbery

They armed themselves chiefly with swords, taking one, two or three
matchlocks, or more should they judge it necessary. Several also carried
their shields and a few had merely sticks, which were in general shod with
small bars of iron from eight to twelve inches in length, strongly secured by
means of rings and somewhat resembling the ancient mace. One of the
party carried a small copper or earthen pot or a cocoanut-shell with a supply
of ghī or clarified butter in it, to moisten their torches with before they
commenced their operations. The Rāmosis endeavoured as much as
possible to avoid being seen by anybody either when they were proceeding
to the object of their attack or returning afterwards to their houses. They
therefore travelled during the night-time; and before daylight in the
morning they concealed themselves in a jungle or ravine near some water,
and slept all day, proceeding in this way for a long distance till they reached
the vicinity of the village to be attacked. When they were pursued and much
pressed, at times they would throw themselves into a bush or under a
prickly pear plant, coiling themselves up so carefully that the chances were
their pursuers would pass them unnoticed. If they intended to attack a
treasure party they would wait at some convenient spot on the road and
sally out when it came abreast of them, first girding up their loins and
twisting a cloth tightly round their faces, to prevent the features from being
recognised. Before entering the village where their dacoity or durrowa was
to be perpetrated, torches were made from the turban of one of the party,
which was torn into three, five or seven pieces, but never into more, the
pieces being then soaked with butter. The same man always supplied the
turban and received in exchange the best one taken in the robbery. Those
who were unarmed collected bags of stones, and these were thrown at any
people who tried to interfere with them during the dacoity. They carried
firearms, but avoided using them if possible, as their discharge might
summon defenders from a distance. They seldom killed or mutilated their
victims, except in a fight, but occasionally travellers were killed after being

Page 592

robbed as a measure of precaution. They retreated with their spoils as
rapidly as possible to the nearest forest or hill, and from there, after
distributing the booty into bags to make it portable, they marched off in a
different direction from that in which they had come. Before reaching their
homes one of the party was deputed with an offering of one, two or five
rupees to be presented as an offering to their god Khandoba or the goddess
Bhawāni in fulfilment of a vow. All the spoil was then deposited before
their Nāik or headman, who divided it into equal shares for members of the
gang, keeping a double share for himself.

3. Rāmosis employed as village watchmen

In order to protect themselves from the depredations of these gangs the
villagers adopted a system of hiring a Rāmosi as a surety to be responsible
for their property, and this man gradually became a Rakhwāldār or village
watchman. He received a grant of land rent-free and other perquisites, and
also a fee from all travellers and gangs of traders who halted in the village
in return for his protection during the night. If a theft or house-breaking
occurred in a village, the Rāmosi was held responsible to the owner for the
value of the property, unless a large gang had been engaged. If he failed to
discover the thief he engaged to make the lost property good to the owner
within fifteen days or a month unless its value was considerable. If a gang
had been engaged, the Rāmosi, accompanied by the patel and other village
officials and cultivators, proceeded to track them by their footprints.
Obtaining a stick he cut it to the exact length of the footprint, or several
such if a number of prints could be discovered, and followed the tracks,
measuring the footprints, to the boundary of the village. The inhabitants of
the adjoining village were then called and were responsible for carrying on
the trail through their village. The measures of footprints were handed over
to them, and after satisfying themselves that the marks came from outside
and extended into their land they took up the trail accompanied by the
Rāmosi. In this way the gang was tracked from village to village, and if it
was run to earth the residents of the villages to which it belonged had to

Page 593

make good the loss. If the tracks were lost owing to the robbers having
waded along a stream or got on to rocky ground or into a public road, then
the residents of the village in whose borders the line failed were considered
responsible for the stolen property. Usually, however, a compromise was
made, and they paid half, while the other half was raised from the village in
which the theft occurred. If the Rāmosi failed to track the thieves out of the
village he had to make good the value of the theft, but he was usually
assisted by the village officer. Often, too, the owner had to be contented
with half or a quarter of the amount lost as compensation. In the early part
of the century the Rāmosis of Poona became very troublesome and
constantly committed robberies in the houses of Europeans. As a
consequence a custom grew up of employing a Rāmosi as chaukidār or
watchman for guarding the bungalow at night on a salary of seven rupees a
month, and soon became general. It was the business of the Rāmosi
watchman to prevent other Rāmosis from robbing the house. Apparently
this was the common motive for the custom, prevalent up to recent years, of
paying a man solely for the purpose of watching the house at night, and it
originated, as in Poona, as a form of insurance and an application of the
proverb of setting a thief to catch a thief. The selection of village watchmen
from among the low, criminal castes appears to have been made on the
same principle.

4. Social customs

The principal deity of the Rāmosis is Khandoba, the Marātha god of war.3
He is the deified sword, the name being khanda-aba or sword-father. An
oath taken on the Bhandar or little bag of turmeric dedicated to Khandoba is
held by them most sacred and no Rāmosi will break this oath. Every
Rāmosi has a family god known as Devak, and persons having the same
Devak cannot intermarry. The Devak is usually a tree or a bunch of the
leaves of several trees. No one may eat the fruit of or otherwise use the tree
which is his Devak. At their weddings the branches of several trees are

Page 594

consecrated as Devaks or guardians of the wedding. A Gurao cuts the leafy
branches of the mango, umar,4 jāmun5 and of the rui6 and shami7 shrubs
and a few stalks of grass and sets them in Hanumān’s temple. From here the
bridegroom’s parents, after worshipping Hanumān with a betel-leaf and five
areca-nuts, take them home and fasten them to the front post of the
marriage-shed. When the bridegroom is taken before the family gods of the
bride, he steals one of them in token of his profession, but afterwards
restores it in return for a payment of money. In social position the Rāmosis
rank a little above the Mahārs and Māngs, not being impure. They speak
Marāthi but have also a separate thieves’ jargon of their own, of which a
vocabulary is given in the account of Captain Mackintosh. When a Rāmosi
child is seven or eight years old he must steal something. If he is caught and
goes to prison the people are delighted, fall at his feet when he comes out
and try to obtain him as a husband for their daughters.8 It is doubtful
whether these practices obtain in the Central Provinces, and as the Rāmosis
are not usually reckoned here among the notorious criminal tribes they may
probably have taken to more honest pursuits.

1 B. G. Poona, Part I., p. 409.
2 An Account of the Origin and Present Condition of the Tribe of Rāmosis (Bombay, 1833; India
Office Tracts. Also published in the Madras Journal of Literature and Science.)

3 This paragraph is mainly compiled from the Nāsik and Poona volumes of the Bombay
Gazetteer.
4 Ficus glomerata.

5 Eugenia jambolana.
6 Calotropis gigantea.
7 Bauhinia racemosa.
8 Poona Gazetteer, part i. p. 425.

Page 595

Rangrez
Rangrez.—The Muhammadan caste of dyers. The caste is found generally
in the northern Districts, and in 1901 its members were included with the
Chhīpas, from whom, however, they should be distinguished as having a
different religion and also because they practise a separate branch of the
dyeing industry. The strength of the caste in the Central Provinces does not
exceed a few hundred persons. The Rangrez is nominally a Muhammadan
of the Sunni sect, but the community forms an endogamous group after the
Hindu fashion, marrying only among themselves. Good-class
Muhammadans will neither intermarry with nor even take food from
members of the Rangrez community. In Sohāgpur town of Hoshangābād
this is divided into two branches, the Kherālawālas or immigrants from
Kherāla in Mālwa and the local Rangrezes. These two groups will take food
together but will not intermarry. Kherālawāla women commonly wear a
skirt like Hindu women and not Muhammadan pyjamas. In Jubbulpore the
Rangrez community employ Brāhmans to conduct their marriage and other
ceremonies. Long association with Hindus has as usual caused the Rangrez
to conform to their religious practices and the caste might almost be
described as a Hindu community with Muhammadan customs. The bulk of
them no doubt were originally converted Hindus, but as their ancestors
probably immigrated from northern India their present leaning to that
religion would perhaps be not so much an obstinate retention of pre-Islamic
ritual as a subsequent lapse following on another change of environment. In
northern India Mr. Crooke records them as being governed mainly by
Muhammadan rules. There1 they hold themselves to be the descendants of
one Khwāja Bali, a very pious man, about whom the following verse is
current:

Khwāja Bali Rangrez
Range Khuda ki sez:

Page 596

‘Khwāja Bali dyes the bed of God.’ The name is derived from rang, colour,
and rez, rekhtān, to pour. In Bihār, Sir G. Grierson states2 the word Rangrez
is often confounded with ‘Angrezi’ or ‘English’; and the English are
sometimes nicknamed facetiously Rangrez or ‘dyers,’ The saying, ‘Were I a
dyer I would dye my own beard first,’ in reference to the Muhammadan
custom of dyeing the beard, has the meaning of ‘Charity begins at home,’3

The art of the Rangrez differs considerably from that of the Chhīpa or
Rangāri, the Hindu dyer, and he produces a much greater variety of colours.
His principal agents were formerly the safflower (Carthamus tinctorius),
turmeric and myrobalans. The fact that the brilliant red dye of safflower
was as a rule only used by Muhammadan dyers, gives some ground for the
supposition that it may have been introduced by them to India. This would
account for the existence of a separate caste of Muhammadan dyers, and in
support of it may be adduced the fact that the variety of colours is much
greater in the dress of the residents of northern India and Rājputāna than in
those of the Marātha Districts. The former patronise many different shades,
more especially for head-cloths, while the latter as a rule do not travel
beyond red, black or blue. The Rangrez obtains his red shades from
safflower, yellow from haldi or turmeric, green from a mixture of indigo
and turmeric, purple from indigo and safflower, khāki or dust-colour from
myrobalans and iron filings, orange from turmeric and safflower, and
badāmi or almond-colour from turmeric and two wild plants kachora and
nāgarmothi, the former of which gives a scent. Cloths dyed in the badāmi
shades are affected, when they can afford it, by Gosains and other religious
mendicants, who thus dwell literally in the odour of sanctity.
Muhammadans generally patronise the shades of green or purple, the latter
being often used as a lining for white coats. Fakīrs or Muhammadan
beggars wear light green. Mārwāri Banias and others from Rājputāna like
the light yellow, pink or orange shades. A green or black head-cloth is with
them a sign of mourning. Cloths dyed in yellow or scarlet are bought by
Brāhmans and other castes of Hindus for their marriages. Blue is not a
lucky colour among the Hindus and is considered as on a level with black.
It may be worn on ordinary occasions, but not at festivals or at auspicious
periods. Muhammadans rather affect black and do not consider it an
unlucky colour. I have seen a Rangrez dye a piece of cloth in about twenty

Page 597

colours in the course of two or three hours, but several of these dyes are
fugitive and will not stand washing. The trade of the Rangrez is being
undermined by the competition of cheap chemical dyes imported from
Germany and sold in the form of powders; the process of dyeing with these
is absolutely simple and can be carried out by any one. They are far cheaper
than safflower, and this agent has consequently been almost driven from the
market. People buy a little dyeing powder from the bazār and dye their own
cloths. But men will only wear cloths dyed in this manner, and known as
katcha kapra, on their heads and not on their bodies; women sometimes
wear them also on their bodies. The decay in the indigenous art of dyeing
must be a matter for regret.

1 Tribes and Castes, art. Rangrez.

2 Peasant Life in Bihār, p. 101, footnote.
3 Temple and Fallon’s Hindustani Proverbs.

Page 598

Rautia

1. Origin of the tribe

Rautia.1—A cultivating caste of the Chota Nāgpur plateau. In 1911 about
12,000 Rautias were enumerated in the Province, nearly all of whom belong
to the Jashpur State with a few in Sargūja. These states lie outside the scope
of the Ethnographic Survey and hence no regular inquiry has been made on
the Rautias. The following brief notice is mainly taken from the account of
the caste in Sir H. Risley’s Tribes and Castes of Bengal. He describes the
caste as, “refined in features and complexion by a large infusion of Aryan
blood. Their chief men hold estates on quit-rent from the Mahārāja of Chota
Nāgpur, and the bulk of the remainder are tenants with occupancy right and
often paying only a low quit-rent or half the normal assessment.” These
favourable tenures may probably be explained by the fact that they were
held in former times on condition of military service, and were analogous to
the feudal fiefs of Europe. The Rautias themselves say that this was their
original occupation in Chota Nāgpur. The name Rautia is a form of Rāwat,
and this latter word signifies a prince and is a title borne by relatives of a
Rāja. It may be noticed that Rāwat is the ordinary name by which the Ahīr
caste is known in Chhattīsgarh, the neighbouring country to Chota Nāgpur
in the Central Provinces; and further that the Rautias will take food from a
Chhattīsgarhi Rāwat. This fact, coupled with the identity of the name,
appears to demonstrate a relationship of the two castes. The Rautias will not
take food from any other Hindu caste, but they will eat with the Kawar and
Gond tribes, at least in Raigarh. The Kawars have a subtribe called Rautia
as also have the Kols. In Sir H. Risley’s list of the sept-names of the
Rautias2 we find two names, Aind the eel, and Rukhi a squirrel, which are

Page 599

also the names of Munda septs, and one, Karsāyal or deer, which is the
name of a Kawar sept. They have also a name Sanwāni, which is probably
Sonwāni or ‘gold-water,’ and is common to many of the primitive tribes.
The most plausible hypothesis of the origin of the Rautias on the above
facts seems to be that they were a tribal militia in Chota Nāgpur, the leaders
being Ahīrs or Rāwats with possibly a sprinkling of the local Rājpūts, while
the main body were recruited from the Kawar and Kol tribes. The
Khandaits or swordsmen of Orissa furnish an exact parallel to the Rautias,
being a tribal militia, who have now become a caste, and are constituted
mainly from the Bhuiya tribe with a proportion of Chasas or cultivators and
Rājpūts. They also have obtained possession of the land, and in Orissa the
Sresta or good Khandaits rank next to the Rājpūts. The history and position
of the Rautias appears to be similar to that of the Khandaits. The Halbas of
Bastar are probably another nearly analogous instance. They were Gonds,
who apparently formed the tribal militia of the Rājas of Bastar and got
grants of land and consequently a certain rise in status though not to the
same level as the Khandaits and Rautias. It does not seem that the Rautias
have any special connection with the Gonds, and their acceptance of food
from Gonds may perhaps, as suggested by Mr. Hīra Lāl, be due to the fact
that they served a Gond Rāja.

2. Subdivisions

The Rautias had formerly three subdivisions, the Barki, Majhli and Chhotki
Bhīr or Gorhi, or the high, middle and low class Rautias. But it is related
that the Barki group found that they could not obtain girls in marriage for
their sons, so they extended the privileges of the connubium to the Majhli
group after taking a caste feast. Possibly the Barki Rautias formerly
practised hypergamy with the Majhli, taking daughters in marriage but not
giving daughters, and in course of time this has led to the obliteration of the
distinction between them. The different status of the three groups was based
on their purity of descent. The Majhli and Chhotki were the descendants of
Rautia fathers and mothers of other castes; the offspring going to the Majhli

Page 600

group if the mother was a Gond or Kawar or of respectable caste, while the
children of impure Gānda and Ghasia women by Rautia fathers were
admitted into the Chhotki group. These divisions confirm the hypothesis
previously given of the genesis of the Rautia caste; and it is further worth
noting that the Khandaits have also Bar and Chhot Gohir divisions or those
of pure and mixed blood, and the Halbas of Bastar are similarly divided into
the Purāit or pure Halbas, and the Surāit or descendants of Halba fathers by
women of other castes. In a military society, where the men were frequently
on the move or stationed in outlying forts and posts, temporary unions and
illegitimate children would naturally be of common occurrence. And the
mixed nature of the three castes affords some support to the hypothesis of
their common origin from military service.

The tribe have totemistic septs, and retain some veneration for their totems.
Those of the Bāgh or tiger sept throw away their earthen pots on hearing of
the death of a tiger. Those of the Sānd or bull sept will not castrate bullocks
themselves, and must have this operation performed on their plough-
bullocks by others. Those of the Kānsi sept formerly, according to their own
account, would not root up the kāns grass3 growing in their fields, but now
they no longer object to do so. Other septs are Tithi a bird, Bīra a hawk,
Barwan a wild dog, and so on.

3. Marriage

Marriage is forbidden within the sept, but is permitted between the children
of a brother and a sister or of two sisters. Matches are arranged at the caste
feasts and the usual bride-price is four rupees with six or seven pieces of
cloth and some grain. When the procession arrives at the bride’s village her
party go out to meet it, and the Gāndas or musicians on each side try to
break each other’s drums, but are stopped by their employers. At the
wedding two wooden images of the bridegroom and bride are made and
placed in the centre of the marriage-shed. A goat is led round these and
killed, and the bride and bridegroom walk round them seven times. They

Page 601

rub vermilion on the wooden images and then on each other’s foreheads. It
is probable that the wooden images are made and set up in the centre of the
shed to attract the evil eye and divert it from the real bride and bridegroom,
and the goat may be a substituted sacrifice on their behalf. Divorce and the
remarriage of widows are permitted.

4. Funeral rites

In the forest tracts the tribe bury the dead, placing the corpse with the feet
to the south. Before being placed in the grave the corpse is rubbed with oil
and turmeric and carried seven times round the grave according to the ritual
of a wedding. This is called the Chhed vivāh or marriage to the grave. The
Kabīrpanthi Rautias are placed standing in the grave with the face turned to
the north. Well-to-do members of the caste burn their dead and employ
Brāhmans to perform the shrāddh ceremony.

5. Inheritance

The tribe have some special rules of inheritance. In Bengal4 the eldest son
of the legitimate wife inherits the whole of the father’s property, subject to
the obligation of making grants for the maintenance of his younger
brothers. These grants decrease according to the standing of the brothers,
the elder ones getting more and the younger less. Sons of a wife married by
the ceremony used for widows receive smaller grants. But the widow of an
elder brother counts as the regular wife of a younger brother and her sons
have full rights of succession. In the Central Provinces the eldest son does
not succeed to the whole property but obtains a share half as large again as
the other sons. And if the father divides the property in his lifetime and
participates in it he himself takes only the share of a younger son.

Page 602

1 Based on Sir H. Risley’s account of the tribe in the Tribes and Castes of Bengal, and on notes
taken by Mr. Hīra Lāl at Raigarh.

2 Tribes and Castes of Bengal, vol. ii. App. I.
3 Saccharum spontaneum.

4 Tribes and Castes of Bengal, art. Rautia.

Page 603

Sanaurhia

1. A band of criminals

Sanaurhia, Chandravedi.1—A small but well-known community of
criminals in Bundelkhand. They claim to be derived from the Sanādhya
Brāhmans, and it seems possible that this may in fact have been their origin;
but at present they are a confraternity recruited by the initiation of
promising boys from all castes except sweepers and Chamārs;2 and a census
taken of them in northern India in 1872 showed that they included members
of the following castes: Brāhman, Rājpūt, Teli, Kurmi, Ahīr, Kanjar, Nai,
Dhobi, Dhīmar, Sunār and Lodhi. It is said, however, that they do not form
a caste or intermarry, members of each caste continuing their relations with
their own community. Their regular method of stealing is through the
agency of a boy, and no doubt they pick up a likely urchin whenever they
get the chance, as only selected boys would be clever enough for the work.
Their trade is said to possess much fascination, and Mr. Crooke quotes a
saying, ‘Once a Sanaurhia always a Sanaurhia’; so that unless the increased
efficiency of the police has caused the dangers of their calling to outweigh
its pleasures they should have no difficulty in obtaining recruits.

2. Traditions of origin

Mr. Seagrim3 states that their home is in the Datia State of Bundelkhand,
and some of them live in the adjoining Alamgarh tract of Indore State.

Page 604

Formerly they also resided in the Orchha and Chanderi States of
Bundelkhand, having six or eight villages in each state4 in their sole
occupation, with colonies in other villages. In 1857 it was estimated that the
Tehri State contained 4000 Sanaurhias, Bānpur 300 and Datia 300. They
occupied twelve villages in Tehri, and an officer of the state presided over
the community and acted as umpire in the division of the spoils. The office
of Mukhia or leader was hereditary in the caste, and in default of male issue
descended to females. If among the booty there happened to be any object
of peculiar elegance or value, it was ceremoniously presented to the chief of
the state. They say that their ancestors were two Sanādhya Brāhmans of the
village of Rāmra in Datia State. They were both highly accomplished men,
and one had the gift of prophecy, while the other could understand the
language of birds. One day they met at a river a rich merchant and his wife,
who were on a pilgrimage to Jagannāth. As they were drinking water a crow
sitting on a tree commenced cawing, and the Sanādhya heard him say that
whoever got hold of the merchant’s walking-stick would be rich. The two
Brāhmans then accompanied the merchant until they obtained an
opportunity of making off with his stick; and they found it to be full of gold
mohurs, the traveller having adopted this device as a precaution against
being robbed. The Brāhmans were so pleased at their success that they took
up stealing as a profession, and opened a school where they taught small
boys of all castes the art of stealing property in the daytime. Prior to
admission the boys were made to swear by the moon that they would never
commit theft at night, and on this account they are known as Chandravedi
or ‘Those who observe the moon.’ In Bombay and Central India this name
is more commonly used than Sanaurhia. Another name for them is
Uthaigīra or ‘A picker-up of that which has fallen,’ corresponding to the
nickname of Uchla or ‘Lifter’ applied to the Bhāmtas. Mr. Seagrim
described them as going about in small gangs of ten to twenty persons
without women, under a leader who has the title of Mukhia or Nālband. The
other men are called Upardār, and each of these has with him one or two
boys of between eight and twelve years old, who are known as Chauwa
(chicks) and do the actual stealing. The Nālband or leader trains these boys
to their work, and also teaches them a code vocabulary (Pārsi) and a set of
signals (teni) by which the Upardār can convey to them his instructions

Page 605

while business is proceeding. The whole gang set out at the end of the rains
and, arriving at some distant place, break up into small parties; the Nālband
remains at a temporary headquarters, where he receives and disposes of the
spoil, and arranges for the defence of any member of the gang who is
arrested, and for the support of his wife and children if he is condemned to
imprisonment.

3. Methods of stealing

The methods of the Sanaurhias as described by Mr. Seagrim show
considerable ingenuity. When they desire to steal something from a stall in
a crowded market two of the gang pretend to have a violent quarrel, on
which all the people in the vicinity collect to watch, including probably the
owner of the stall. In this case the Chauwa or boy, who has posted himself
in a position of vantage, will quickly abstract the article agreed upon and
make off. Or if there are several purchasers at a shop, the man will wait
until one of them lays down his bundle while he makes payment, and then
pushing up against him signal to the Chauwa, who snatches up the bundle
and bolts. If he is caught, the Sanaurhia will come up as an innocent
member of the crowd and plead for mercy on the score of his youth; and the
boy will often be let off with a few slaps. Sometimes three or four
Sanaurhias will proceed to some place of resort for pilgrims to bathe, and
two or three of them entering the water will divert the attention of the
bather by pointing out some strange object or starting a discussion. In the
meantime the Chauwas or chicks, under the direction of another on the
bank, will steal any valuable article left by the bather. The attention of any
one left on shore to watch the property is diverted by a similar device. If
they see a man with expensive clothes the Chauwa will accidentally brush
against him and smear him with dirt or something that causes pollution; the
victim will proceed to bathe, and one of the usual stratagems is adopted. Or
the Sanaurhia will engage the man in conversation and the Chauwa will
come running along and collide with them; on being abused by the
Sanaurhia for his clumsiness he asks to be pardoned, explaining that he is

Page 606

only a poor sweeper and meant no harm; and on hearing this the victim,
being polluted, must go off and bathe.5 Colonel Sleeman relates the
following case of such a theft:6 “While at Saugor I got a note one morning
from an officer in command of a treasure escort just arrived from
Narsinghpur stating that the old Sūbahdār of his company had that morning
been robbed of his gold necklace valued at Rs. 150, and requesting that I
would assist him in recovering it. The old Sūbahdār brought the note, and
stated that he had undressed at the brook near the cantonments, and placed
the necklace with his clothes, about twenty yards from the place where he
bathed; that on returning to his clothes he could not find the necklace, and
the only person he saw near the place was a young lad who was sauntering
in the mango grove close by. This lad he had taken and brought with him,
and I found after a few questions that he belonged to the Sanaurhia
Brāhmans of Bundelkhand. As the old Sūbahdār had not seen the boy take
the necklace or even approach the clothes, I told him that we could do
nothing, and he must take the boy back to camp and question him in his
own way. The boy, as I expected, became alarmed, and told me that if I
would not send him back with the angry old Sūbahdār he would do
anything I pleased. I bade him tell me how he had managed to secure the
necklace; and he told me that while the Sūbahdār turned his back upon his
clothes in prayer, he had taken it up and made it over to one of the men of
his party; and that it must have been taken to their bivouac, which was in a
grove about three miles from the cantonments. I sent off a few policemen,
who secured the whole party, but could not find anything upon them.
Seeing some signs of a hole having been freshly made under one of the
trees they dug up the fresh earth and discovered the necklace, which the old
man was delighted to recover so easily.” Another device which they have is
to beat the Chauwa severely in the sight of a rich stranger. The boy runs
crying and clings to the stranger asking him for help, and in the meantime
picks his pocket. When the Sanaurhias are convicted in Native States and
put into jail they refuse to eat, pleading that they are poor Brāhmans, and
pretend to starve themselves to death, and thus often get out of jail. In reply
to a letter inquiring about these people from the Superintendent of Chanderi
about 1851, the Rāja of Bānpur wrote:

Page 607

“I have to state that from former times these people following their
profession have resided in my territory and in the states of other native
princes; and they have always followed this calling, but no former kings or
princes or authority have ever forbidden the practice. In consequence of
these people stealing by day only, and that they do not take life or distress
any person by personal ill-usage, and that they do not break into houses by
digging walls or breaking door-locks, but simply by their smartness manage
to abstract property; owing to such trifling thefts I looked upon their
proceedings as a petty matter and have not interfered with them.”7 This
recalls another famous excuse.

1 This article is based principally on an account of the Sanaurhias written by Mr. C.M. Seagrim,
Inspector-General of Police, Indore, and included in Mr. Kennedy’s Criminal Classes of
Bombay (1908).
2 Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, art. Sanaurhia.

3 Criminal Classes of Bombay Presidency, pp. 296, 297.
4 Sleeman’s Reports on the Badhaks, p. 327.
5 Mr. Gayer’s Lectures on some Criminal Tribes.
6 Report on the Badhak or Bāgri Dacoits (1849), p. 328.

7 J. Hutton, A Popular Account of the Thugs and Dacoits and Gang-robbers of India (London,
1857).

Page 608

Sānsia
List of Paragraphs

1. Historical notice of the caste
2. Social customs
3. Taboos of relationship
4. Organisation for dacoity
5. Description of a dacoity
6. Omens
7. Ordeals
8. Sānsias at the present time

1. Historical notice of the caste

Sānsia.1—A small caste of wandering criminals of northern India, who live
by begging and dealing in cattle. They also steal and commit dacoities,
house-breaking and thefts on railway trains. The name Sānsia is borne as
well by the Uriya or Od masons of the Uriya country, but these are believed
to be quite a distinct group from the criminal Sānsias of Central India and
are noticed in another short article. Separate statistics of the two groups
were not obtained at the census. The Sānsias are closely connected with the
Berias, and say that their ancestors were two brothers Sains Mūl and Sānsi,
and that the Berias are descended from the former and the Sānsias from the
latter. They were the bards of the Jāt caste, and it was their custom to
chronicle the names of the Jāts and their ancestors, and when they begged
from Jāt families to recite their praises. The Sānsias, Colonel Sleeman
states, had particular families (of the Jāts) allotted to them, from whom they
had not only the privilege of begging, but received certain dues; some had

Page 609

fifty, some a hundred houses appointed to them, and they received yearly
from the head of each house one rupee and a quarter and one day’s food.
When the Jāts celebrated their marriages they were accustomed to invite the
Sānsias, who as their minstrels recited the praises of the ancestors of the
Jāts, tracing them up to the time of Punya Jāt; and for this they received
presents, according to the means of the parties, of cows, ponies or buffaloes.
Should any Jāt demur to paying the customary dues the Sānsias would dress
up a cloth figure of his father and parade with it before the house, when the
sum demanded was generally given; for if the figure were fastened on a
bamboo and placed over the house the family would lose caste and no one
would smoke or drink water with them.2

The Sānsias say that their ancestors have always resided in Mārwār and
Ajmer. About twenty-four miles distant from Ajmer are two towns,
Pīsangān and Sagun; on their eastern side is a large tank, and the bones of
all persons of the Sānsia tribe who died in any part of the country were
formerly buried there, being covered by a wooden platform with four
pillars.3 On one occasion a quarrel had arisen over a Sānsia woman, and a
large number of the caste were killed in this place. So they left Mārwār, and
some of them came to the Deccan, where they took to house-breaking and
dacoity; and so successful were they that the other Sānsias followed them
and gave up all their former customs, even those of reciting the praises of
and begging from the Jāts.

2. Social customs

The Sānsias are divided into two groups, Kalkar and Malha; and these two
are further subdivided into eight and twelve sections respectively. No one
belonging to the Kalkar group may marry another person of that group, but
he may marry anybody belonging to any section of the Malha group. Thus
the two groups being exogamous the sections do not serve any purpose, but
it is possible that the rules are really more complicated. In the Punjab their
marriage ceremony is peculiar, the bride being covered by a basket, on

Page 610

which the bridegroom sits while the nuptial rites are being performed.4
According to Colonel Sleeman, after the arrangement of a match the caste
committee assemble to determine the price to be paid to the father of the
girl, which may amount to as much as Rs. 2000. When this is settled some
liquor is spilt on the ground in the name of Bhagwān or Vishnu, and an
elder pronounces that the two have become man and wife; a feast is given
to the caste, and the ceremony is concluded. After child-birth a woman
cannot wash herself for five days, but on the sixth she may go to a stream
and wash. Even on ordinary occasions a woman must never wash herself
inside the house, but must always go to a stream, which rule does not apply
to men. When the hair of a child begins to grow it is all shaved except the
scalp-lock, which is dedicated to Bhagwān; and at ten or twelve years of
age this lock is also shaved off and a dinner is given to members of the
caste. The last ceremony is of the nature of a puberty-rite, and if children
die prior to its performance their bodies are buried, whereas after it they
have a right to cremation. After a body has been burnt the bones are buried
on the spot in an earthen vessel, over the mouth of which a large stone is
placed. Some pig’s flesh is cooked and sweet cakes prepared, portions of
which are placed upon the stone; and the deceased is then called upon, by
reason of the usual ceremonies having been performed at his death, to
watch over his surviving relatives. If any Sānsia happened to commit a
murder when engaged in a dacoity he was afterwards obliged to make an
offering for forgiveness, and to spend a rupee and a quarter in liquor for the
caste-fellows. If a dacoit had himself been killed and his body abandoned,
his clothes, with some new clothes, were put upon a sleeping-cot, and his
companions of the same caste carried it to a convenient spot, where it was
either burnt or buried in the ground.

3. Taboos of relationship

Colonel Sleeman records some curious taboos among relations.5 A man
cannot go into the hut of his mother-in-law or of his son’s wife; for if their

Page 611

petticoat should touch him he would be turned out of his caste and would
not be admitted into it until he had paid a large sum. “If we quarrel with a
woman,” said a Sānsia, “and she strikes us with her petticoat we lose our
caste; we should be allowed to eat and drink with our tribe, but not to
perform worship with them nor to assist in burial rites. If a woman piles up
a heap of stones and puts her petticoat upon it and throws filth upon it and
says to any other, ‘This disgrace fell upon your ancestors for seven
generations back,’ both are immediately expelled from our caste, and cannot
return to it until they have paid a large sum of money.”

4. Organisation for dacoity

As in the case of the Badhaks the arrangements for a dacoity were carefully
organised. Each band had a Jemādār or leader, while the others were called
Sipāhis or soldiers. A tenth of all the booty taken was given to the Jemādār
in return for the provision of the spears, torches and other articles, and of
the remainder the Jemādār received two shares and the Sipāhis one each.
But no novice was permitted to share in the booty or carry a spear until he
had participated in two or three successful dacoities; and inasmuch as
outsiders, with the exception of the impure Dhers and Māngs, were freely
admitted to the Sānsia community in return for a small money payment,
some such apprenticeship as this was no doubt necessary. If a Sipāhi was
killed in a dacoity his wife was entitled to a sum of Rs. 350 and half an
ordinary share in future dacoities as long as she remained with the gang.
The Sānsias never pitched their camp in the vicinity of the place in which
they contemplated an enterprise, but despatched their scouts to it,
themselves remaining some twenty miles distant.

5. Description of a dacoity

Page 612

The scouts,6 having prospected the town and determined the house to be
exploited, usually that of the leading banker, would then proceed to it in the
early morning before business began and ask to purchase some ornaments
or change some money; by this request they often induced the banker to
bring out his cash chest from the place of security where he was
accustomed to deposit it at night, and learnt where it should be looked for.
Having picked up as much information as possible, the scouts would
purchase some spear-heads, bury them in a neighbouring ravine, and rejoin
the main body. The party would arrive at the rendezvous in the evening, and
having fitted their spears to bamboo shafts, would enter the town carrying
them concealed in a bundle of karbi or the long thick stalks of the large
millet, juāri.7 One man was appointed to carry the torch,8 and the oil to be
poured on this had always to be purchased in the town or village where the
dacoity was to take place, the use of any other oil being considered most
unlucky. The vessel containing the oil was not allowed to touch the earth
until its contents had been poured upon the torch, when it was dashed upon
the ground. From this time until the completion of the dacoity no one might
spit or drink water or relieve himself under penalty of putting a stop to the
enterprise. The Jemādār invoked Khandoba, an incarnation of Mahādeo,
and said that if by his assistance the box of money was broken at the first or
second stroke of the axe, a chain of gold weighing one and a quarter tolas
would be made over to him. The party then approached the shop, the roads
surrounding it being picketed to guard against a rescue, and the Jemādār,
accompanied by four or five men and the torch-bearer, rushed into the shop
crying Dīn, Dīn. The doors usually gave way under a few heavy blows with
the axe, which they wielded with great expertness, and the scout pointed out
the location of the money and valuables. Once in possession of the property
the torch was extinguished and the whole party made off as rapidly as
possible. During their retreat they tried to avoid spearing people who
pursued them, first calling out to them to go away. If any member of the
party was killed or so desperately wounded that he could not be removed,
the others cut off his head and carried it off so as to prevent recognition; a
man who was slightly wounded would be carried off by his companions,
but if the pursuit became hot and he had to be left, they cut off his head also
and took it with them, escaping by this drastic method the risk of his turning

Page 613

approver with the consequent danger of conviction for the rest of the gang.
About a mile from the place of the dacoity they stopped and mustered their
party, and the Jemādār called out to the god Bhagwān to direct any pursuers
in the wrong direction and enable them to reach their families. If any dacoit
had ever been killed at this particular town they also called upon his spirit
to assist them, promising to offer him a goat or some liquor; and so,
throwing down a rupee or two at any temple or stream which they might
pass on their way, they came to their families. When about a mile away
from the camp they called out ‘Cuckoo’ to ascertain if any misfortune had
occurred during their absence; if they thought all was well they went nearer
and imitated the call of the partridge; and finally when close to the
encampment made a hissing noise like a snake. On arrival at the camp they
at once mounted their ponies and started off, marching fifty or sixty miles a
day, for two or three days.

6. Omens

The Sānsias never committed a dacoity on moonlight nights, but had five
appointed days during the dark half of the month, the seventh, ninth,
eleventh, thirteenth and the night of the day on which the new moon was
first seen. If they did not meet with a favourable omen on any of these
nights, no dacoity was committed that month. The following is a list of
omens given by one of the caste:9 “If we see a cat when we are near the
place where we intend to commit a dacoity, or we hear the relations of a
dead person lamenting, or hear a person sneeze while cooking his meal, or
see a dog run away with a portion of any person’s food, or a kite screams
while sitting on a tree, or a woman breaks the earthen vessel in which she
may have been drawing water, we consider the omens unfavourable. If a
person drops his turban or we meet a corpse, or the Jemādār has forgotten to
put some bread into his waistbelt, or any dacoit forgets his axe or spear or
sees a snake whether dead or alive; these omens are also considered
unfavourable and we do not commit the dacoity. Should we see a wolf and

Page 614

any one of us have on a red turban, we take this and tear it into seven pieces
and hang each piece upon a separate tree. We then purchase a rupee’s worth
of liquor and kill a goat, which is cut up into four pieces. Four men pretend
that they are wolves and rushing on the four quarters of the meat seize
them, imitating the howl of these animals, while the rest of the dacoits pelt
them with the entrails; the meat is afterwards cooked and eaten in the name
of Bhagwān.”

It would appear that the explanation of this curious ceremony must be that
the Sānsias thought the appearance of the wolf to be an omen that one of
them would furnish a meal for him. The turban is venerated on account of
its close association with the head, a sacred part of the body among Hindus,
and in this case it probably served as a substituted offering for the head,
while its red colour represented blood; and the mimic rite of the goat being
devoured by men pretending to be wolves fulfilled the omen which
portended that the wolves would be provided with a meal, and hence
averted the necessity of one of the band being really devoured. In somewhat
analogous fashion the Gonds and Baigas placate or drive away a tiger who
has killed a man in order to prevent him from obtaining further victims.
Some similar idea apparently underlay the omen of the dog running away
with food. Perhaps the portent of hearing the kite scream on a tree also
meant that he looked on them with a prescient eye as a future meal. On the
other hand, meeting a corpse and seeing a snake are commonly considered
to be lucky omens, and their inclusion in this list is curious.10 The passage
continues: “Among our favourable omens are meeting a woman selling
milk; or a person carrying a basket of grain or a bag of money; or if we see
a calf sucking its mother, or meet a person with a vessel of water, or a
marriage procession; or if any person finds a rupee that he has lost; or we
meet a bearer carrying fish or a pig or a blue-jay; if any of these occur near
our camp on the day we contemplate a dacoity, we proceed forthwith to
commit it and consider that these signs assure us a good booty. If a Fakīr
begs from us while we are on our way to the place of dacoity we cannot
give him anything.” Another Sānsia said: “We think it very favourable if,
when on the way to commit a dacoity we hear or see the jackal; it is as good
as gold and silver to us; also if we hear the bray of the ass in a village we
consider it to be lucky.”

Page 615

7. Ordeals

The following is a description given by a Sānsia of their ordeals:11 If a
Jemādār suspects a Sipāhi of secreting plunder a panchāyat is assembled,12
the members of which receive five rupees from both parties. Seven pīpal13
leaves are laid upon his hand and bound round with thread, and upon these
a heated iron tawa or plate is set; he is then ordered to walk seven paces and
put the plate down upon seven thorns; should he be able to do so he is
pronounced innocent, but if he is burnt by the plate and throws it down he is
considered guilty. Another ordeal is by fixing arrows, two of which are shot
off at once from one bow, one in the name of Bhagwān (god), and the other
in the name of the panchāyat; the place being on the bank of the river. The
arrow that flies the farthest is stuck upright into the ground; upon which a
man carrying a long bamboo walks up to his breast in the water and the
suspected person is desired to join him. One of the panchāyat then claps his
hands seven times and runs off to pick up the arrow; at this instant the
suspected person is obliged to put his head under water, and if he can hold
his breath until the other returns to the bank with the arrow and has again
clapped his hands seven times he is pronounced innocent. If he cannot do so
he is declared guilty and punished. A third form of ordeal was as follows:
The Jemādār and the gang assemble under a pīpal tree, and after knocking
off the neck of an earthen pitcher they kill a goat and collect its blood in the
pitcher, and put some glass bangles in it. Four lines are drawn on the pitcher
with vermilion (representing blood), and it is placed under a tree and 1¼
seers14 of gur (sugar) are tied up in a piece of cloth 1¼ cubits in length and
hung on to a branch of the tree. The Jemādār then says, ‘I will forgive any
person who has not secreted more than fifteen or twenty rupees, but
whoever has stolen more than that sum shall be punished.’ The Jemādār
dips his finger in the pitcher of blood, and afterwards touches the sugar and
calls out loudly, ‘If I have embezzled any money may Bhagwān punish me’;
and each dacoit in turn pronounces the same sentence. No one who is guilty

Page 616

will do this but at once makes his confession. The oath pronounced on 1¼
seers of sugar tied up in 1¼ cubits of cloth was considered the most solemn
and binding which a Sānsia could take.

8. Sānsias at the present time

At present, Mr. Kennedy states,15 the Sānsias travel about in gangs of
varying strength with their families, bullocks, sheep, goats and dogs. The
last mentioned of these animals are usually small mongrels with a terrier
strain, mostly stolen or bred from types dishonestly obtained during their
peregrinations. Dacoity is still the crime which they most affect, and they
also break into houses and steal cattle. Men usually have a necklace of red
coral and gold beads round the neck, from which is suspended a square
piece of silver or gold bearing an effigy of a man on horseback. This
represents either the deity Rāmdeo Pīr or one of the wearer’s ancestors, and
is venerated as a charm. They are very quarrelsome, and their drinking-
bouts in camp usually end in a free fight, in which they also beat their
women, and the affray not infrequently results in the death of one of the
combatants. When this happens the slayer makes restitution to the relatives
by defraying the expenses of a fresh drinking-bout.16 During the daytime
men are seldom to be found in the encampment, as they are in the habit of
hiding in the ditches and jungle, where the women take them their food; at
night they return to their tents, but are off again at dawn.

1 This article is based almost entirely on a description of the Sānsias contained in Colonel
Sleeman’s Report on the Badhak or Bāgri Dacoits (1849). Most of the material belongs to a
report drawn up at Nāgpur by Mr. C. Ramsay, Assistant Resident, in 1845.
2 Sleeman’s Report on the Badhaks, p. 253.

3 Ibidem, p. 254.
4 Sir D. Ibbetson, Punjab Census Report (1881), para. 577.

5 P. 259.

Page 617

6 The description of a dacoity is combined from two accounts given at pp. 257, 273 of Colonel
Sleeman’s Report.

7 Sorghum vulgare.
8 Made of the bark of the date-palm tied with strips of cloth round some inflammable wood.

9 Sleeman, p. 263.
10 But it is unlucky for a snake to cross one’s path in front.

11 Sleeman, pp. 261, 262.
12 Committee of five persons.

13 Ficus religiosa.
14 The seer = 2 lbs.

15 Criminal Classes in the Bombay Presidency; Sānsias and Berias.
16 Mr. Gayer, Central Provinces Police Lectures; p. 68.

Page 618

Sānsia, Uria

1. The caste and its subdivisions

Sānsia, Uria.1—A caste of masons and navvies of the Uriya country. The
Sānsias are really a branch of the great migratory Ud or Odde caste of
earth-workers, whose name has been corrupted into various forms.2 Thus in
Chānda they are known as Wadewār or Waddar. The term Uria is here a
corruption of Odde, and it is the one by which the caste prefer to be known,
but they are generally called Sānsia by outsiders. The caste sometimes class
the Sānsias as a subcaste of Urias, the others being Benātia Urias and
Khandait Urias. Since the Uriya tract has been transferred to Bengal, and
subsequently to Bihār and Orissa, there remain only about 1000 Sānsias in
the Chhattīsgarh Districts and States. Although it is possible that the name
of the caste may have been derived from some past connection, the Sānsias
of the Uriya country have at present no affinities with the outcaste and
criminal tribe of Sānsis or Sānsias of northern India. They enjoy a fairly
high position in Sarnbalpur, and Brāhmans will take water from them.

They are divided into two subcastes, the Benetia and Khandait. The Benetia
are the higher and look down on the Khandaits, because, it is said, these
latter have accepted service as foot-soldiers, and this is considered a menial
occupation. Perhaps in the households of the Uriya Rājas the tribal militia
had also to perform personal services, and this may have been considered
derogatory., In Orissa, on the other hand, the Khandaits have become
landholders and occupy a high position next to Rājpūts. The Benetia
Sānsias practise hypergamy with the Khandait Sansias, taking their
daughters in marriage, but not giving daughters to them. When a Benetia is
marrying a Khandait girl his party will not take food with the bride’s

Page 619

relatives, but only partake of some sugar and curds and depart with the
bride. The Sānsias have totemistic exogamous septs, usually derived from
the names of sacred objects, as Kachhap, tortoise, Sankh, the conch-shell,
Tulsi, basil, and so on.

2. Marriage customs

Girls are married between seven and ten, and after she is twelve years old a
girl cannot go through the proper ceremony, but can only be wedded by a
simple rite used for widows, in which vermilion is rubbed on her forehead
and some grains of rice stuck on it. The marriage procession, as described
by Mr. Rāma Prasād Bohidār, is a gorgeous affair: “The drummers, all
drunk, head the procession, beating their drums to the tune set by the piper.
Next in order are placed dancing-boys between two rows of lights carried
on poles adorned with festoons of paper flowers. Rockets and fireworks
have their proper share in the procession, and last of all comes the
bridegroom in his wedding apparel, mounted on a horse. His person is
studded with various kinds of gold necklaces borrowed for the occasion,
and the fingers of his right hand are covered with rings. Bangles and chains
of silver shine on his wrists and arms. His forehead is beautifully painted
with ground sandalwood divided in the centre by a streak of vermilion. His
head carries a crown of palm-leaves overlaid with bright paper of various
colours. A network of mālti flowers hangs loosely from the head over the
back and covers a portion of the loins of the steed. The eyes are painted
with collyrium and the feet with red dye. The lips and teeth are also
reddened by the betel-leaf, which the bridegroom chews in profusion. A silk
cloth does the work of a belt, in which is fixed a dagger on the right side.”
Here the red colour which predominates in the bridegroom’s decorations is
lucky for the reasons given in the article on Lakhera; the blacking of the
eyes is also considered to keep off evil spirits; betel-leaf is itself a powerful
agent of magic and averter of spirits, and to the same end the bridegroom
carries iron in the shape of the dagger. The ceremony is of the customary
Uriya type. On the seventh day of the wedding the husband and wife go to

Page 620

the river and bathe, throwing away the sacred threads worn at the time of
marriage, and also those which have been tied round their wrists. On
returning home the wife piles up seven brass vessels and seven stools one
above the other and the husband kicks them over, this being repeated seven
times. The husband then washes his teeth with water brought from the river,
breaks the vessel containing the water in the bride’s house, and runs away,
while the women of her family throw pailfuls of coloured water over him.
On the ninth day the bride comes and smears a mixture of curds and sugar
on the forehead of each member of the bridegroom’s family, probably as a
sign of her admission to their clan, and returns home. Divorce and the
remarriage of widows are permitted.

3. Religion and worship of ancestors

The caste worship Viswakarma, the celestial architect, and on four principal
festivals they revere their trade-implements and the book on architecture, by
which they work. At Dasahra a pumpkin is offered to these articles in lieu
of a goat. They observe the shrāddh ceremony, and first make two offerings
to the spirits of ancestors who have died a violent death or have committed
suicide, and to those of relatives who died unmarried, for fear lest these
unclean and malignant spirits should seize and defile the offerings to the
beneficent ancestors. Thereafter pindas or sacrificial cakes are offered to
three male and three female ancestors both on the father’s and mother’s
side, twelve cakes being offered in all. The Sānsias eat the flesh of clean
animals, but the consumption of liquor is strictly forbidden, on pain, it is
said, of permanent exclusion from caste.

4. Occupation

Page 621

In Sambalpur the caste are usually stone-workers, making cups, mortars,
images of idols and other articles. They also build tanks and wander from
place to place for this purpose in large companies. It is related that on one
occasion they came to dig a tank in Drūg, and the Rāja of that place, while
watching their work, took a fancy to one of the Odnis, as their women were
called, and wanted her to marry him. But as she was already married, and
was a virtuous woman, she refused. The Rāja persisted in his demand, on
which the whole body of Sānsias from Chhattīsgarh, numbering, it is said,
nine lakhs of persons, left their work and proceeded to Warārbāndh, near
Rāj-Nāndgaon. Here they dug the great tank of Warārbāndh3 in one night to
obtain a supply of water for themselves. But the Raja followed them, and as
they could not resist him by force, the woman whom he was pursuing burnt
herself alive, and thus earned undying fame in the caste. This legend is
perpetuated in the Odni Gīt, a popular folk-song in Chhattīsgarh. But it is a
traditional story of the Sānsias in connection with large tanks, and in
another version the scene is laid in Gujarāt.4

1 This article is mainly based on a paper by Mr. Rāma Prasād Bohidār, Assistant Master,
Sambalpur High School.
2 See article Beldār for a notice of the different groups of earth-workers.

3 Said to be derived from their name Waddar.
4 Story of Jasma Odni in Sati Charita Sangrah.

Page 622

Savar
List of Paragraphs

1. Distribution and historical notices
2. Tribal legends
3. Tribal subdivisions
4. Marriage
5. Death ceremonies
6. Religion
7. Occupation

1. Distribution and historical notices

Savar,1 Sawara, Savara, Saonr, Sahra (and several other variations. In
Bundelkhand the Savars, there called Saonrs, are frequently known by the
honorific title of Rāwat).—A primitive tribe numbering about 70,000
persons in the Central Provinces in 1911, and principally found in the
Chhattīsgarh Districts and those of Saugor and Damoh. The eastern branch
of the tribe belongs chiefly to the Uriya country. The Savars are found in
large numbers in the Madras Districts of Ganjām and Vizagapatam and in
Orissa. They also live in the Bundelkhand Districts of the United Provinces.
The total number of Savars enumerated in India in 1911 was 600,000, of
which the Bundelkhand Districts contained about 100,000 and the Uriya
country the remainder. The two branches of the tribe are thus separated by a
wide expanse of territory. As regards this peculiarity of distribution General
Cunningham says: “Indeed there seems good reason to believe that the
Savaras were formerly the dominant branch of the great Kolarian family,
and that their power lasted down to a comparatively late period, when they

Page 623

were pushed aside by other Kolarian tribes in the north and east, and by the
Gonds in the south. In the Saugor District I was informed that the Savaras
had formerly fought with the Gonds and that the latter had conquered them
by treacherously making them drunk.”2 Similarly Cunningham notices that
the zamīndār of Suarmār in Raipur, which name is derived from Savar, is a
Gond. A difference of opinion has existed as to whether the Savars were
Kolarian or Dravidian so far as their language was concerned, Colonel
Dalton adopting the latter view and other authorities the former and correct
one. In the Central Provinces the Savars have lost their own language and
speak the Aryan Hindi or Uriya vernacular current around them. But in
Madras they still retain their original speech, which is classified by Sir G.
Grierson as Mundāri or Kolarian. He says: “The most southerly forms of
Munda speech are those spoken by the Savars and Gadabas of the north-
east of Madras. The former have been identified with the Suari of Pliny and
the Sabarae of Ptolemy. A wild tribe of the same name is mentioned in
Sanskrit literature, even so far back as in late Vedic times, as inhabiting the
Deccan, so that the name at least can boast great antiquity.”3 As to the
origin of the name Savar, General Cunningham says that it must be sought
for outside the language of the Aryans. “In Sanskrit savara simply means ‘a
corpse.’ From Herodotus, however, we learn that the Scythian word for an
axe was sagaris, and as ‘g’ and ‘v’ are interchangeable letters savar is the
same word as sagar. It seems therefore not unreasonable to infer that the
tribe who were so called took their name from their habit of carrying axes.
Now it is one of the striking peculiarities of the Savars that they are rarely
seen without an axe in their hands. The peculiarity has been frequently
noticed by all who have seen them.”4 The above opinion of Cunningham,
which is of course highly speculative, is disputed by Mr. Crooke, who says
that “The word Savara, if it be, as some believe, derived from sava a
corpse, comes from the root sav ‘to cause to decay,’ and need not
necessarily therefore be of non-Aryan origin, while on the other hand no
distinct inference can be drawn from the use of the axe by the Savars, when
it is equally used by various other Dravidian jungle tribes such as the
Korwas, Bhuiyas and the like.”5 In the classical stories of their origin the
first ancestor of the Savars is sometimes described as a Bhīl. The word
Savar is mentioned in several Sanskrit works written between 800 B.C. and

Page 624

A.D. 1200, and it seems probable that they are a Munda tribe who occupied
the tracts of country which they live in prior to the arrival of the Gonds. The
classical name Savar has been corrupted into various forms. Thus in the
Bundeli dialect ‘ava’ changes into ‘au’ and a nasal is sometimes
interpolated. Savar has here become Saunr or Saonr. The addition of ‘a’ at
the end of the word sometimes expresses contempt, and Savar becomes
Savara as Chamār is corrupted into Chamra. In the Uriya country ‘v’ is
changed into ‘b’ and an aspirate is interpolated, and thus Savara became
Sabra or Sahara, as Gaur has become Gahra. The word Sahara, Mr. Crooke
remarks,6 has excited speculation as to its derivation from Arabic, in which
Sahara means a wilderness; and the name of the Savars has accordingly
been deduced from the same source as the great Sahara desert. This is of
course incorrect.

2. Tribal legends

Various stories of the origin of the Savars are given in Sanskrit literature. In
the Aitareya Brāhmana they are spoken of as the descendants of
Vishwāmitra, while in the Mahābhārat they are said to have been created by
Kāmdhenu, Vasishtha’s wonder-working cow, in order to repel the
aggression of Vishwāmitra. Local tradition traces their origin to the
celebrated Seorī of the Rāmāyana, who is supposed to have lived
somewhere near the present Seorīnārāyan in the Bilāspur District and to
have given her name to this place. Rāmchandra in his wanderings met her
there, ate the plums which she had gathered for him after tasting each one
herself, and out of regard for her devotion permitted her name to precede
his own of Nārāyan in that given to the locality. Another story makes one
Jara Savar their original ancestor, who was said to have shot Krishna in the
form of a deer. Another states that they were created for carrying stones for
the construction of the great temple at Puri and for dragging the car of
Jagannāth, which they still do at the present time. Yet another connecting
them with the temple of Jagannāth states that their ancestor was an old Bhīl

Page 625

hermit called Sawar, who lived in Karod, two miles from Seorīnārāyan. The
god Jagannāth had at this time appeared in Seorīnārāyan and the old Sawar
used to worship him. The king of Orissa had built the great temple at Puri
and wished to install Jagannāth in it, and he sent a Brāhman to fetch him
from Seorīnārāyan, but nobody knew where he was except the old hermit
Sawar. The Brāhman besought him in vain to be allowed to see the god and
even went so far as to marry his daughter, and finally the old man consented
to take him blindfold to the place. The Brāhman, however, tied some
mustard seeds in a corner of his cloth and made a hole in it so that they
dropped out one by one on the way. After some time they grew up and
served to guide him to the spot. This story of the mustard seeds of course
finds a place in the folklore of many nations. The Brāhman then went to
Seorīnārāyan alone and begged the god to go to Puri. Jagannāth consented,
and assuming the form of a log of wood floated down the Mahānadi to Puri,
where he was taken out and placed in the temple. A carpenter agreed to
carve the god’s image out of the log of wood on condition that the temple
should be shut up for six months while the work was going on. But some
curious people opened the door before the time and the work could not
proceed, and thus the image of the god is only half carved out of the wood
up to the present day. As a consolation to the old man the god ordained that
the place should bear the hermit’s name before his own as Seorīnārāyan.
Lastly the Saonrs of Bundelkhand have the following tradition. In the
beginning of creation Mahādeo wished to teach the people how to cultivate
the ground, and so he made a plough and took out his bull Nandi to yoke to
it But there was dense forest on the earth, so he created a being whom he
called Savar and gave him an axe to clear the forest. In the meantime
Mahādeo went away to get another bullock. The Savar after clearing the
forest felt very hungry, and finding nothing else to eat killed Nandi and ate
his flesh on a teak leaf. And for this reason the young teak leaves when
rubbed give out sap which is the colour of blood to the present day. After
some time Mahādeo returned, and finding the forest well cleared was
pleased with the Savar, and as a reward endowed him with the knowledge
of all edible and medicinal roots and fruits of the forest. But on looking
round for Nandi he found him lying dead with some of his flesh cut off. The
Savar pleaded ignorance, but Mahādeo sprinkled a little nectar on Nandi,
who came to life again and told what had happened. Then Mahādeo was

Page 626

enraged with the Savar and said, ‘You shall remain a barbarian and dwell
for ever in poverty in the jungles without enough to eat.’ And accordingly
this has always been the condition of the Savar’s descendants.

Other old authors speak of the Parna or leaf-clad Savars; and a Savar
messenger is described as carrying a bow in his hand “with his hair tied up
in a knot behind with a creeper, black himself, and wearing a loin-cloth of
bhilawān leaves”;7 an excellent example of ‘a leaf-fringed legend.’

3. Tribal subdivisions

The Bundelkhand Savars have been so long separated from the others that
they have sometimes forgotten their identity and consider themselves as a
subtribe of Gonds, though the better informed repudiate this. They may be
regarded as a separate endogamous group. The eastern branch have two
main divisions called Laria and Uriya, or those belonging to Chhattīsgarh
and Sambalpur respectively. A third division known as the Kālāpithia or
‘Black Backs’ are found in Orissa, and are employed to drag the car of
Jagannāth. These on account of their sacred occupation consider themselves
superior to the others, abstain from fowls and liquor, and sometimes wear
the sacred thread. The Larias are the lowest subdivision. Marriage is
regulated by exogamous septs or bargas. The northern Savars say that they
have 52 of these, 52 being a number frequently adopted to express the
highest possible magnitude, as if no more could be imagined. The Uriya
Savars say they have 80 bargas. Besides the prohibition of marriage within
the same barga, the union of first cousins is sometimes forbidden. Among
the Uriya Savars each barga has the two further divisions of Joria and
Khuntia, the Jorias being those who bury or burn their dead near a jor or
brook, and the Khuntias those who bury or burn them near a khunt or old
tree. Jorias and Khuntias of the same barga cannot intermarry, but in the
case of some other subdivisions of the barga, as between those who eat rice
at one festival in the year and those eating it at two, marriage is allowed
between members of the two subdivisions, thus splitting the exogamous

Page 627

group into two. The names of the bargas are usually totemistic, and the
following are some examples: Badaiya, the carpenter bird; Bāgh, the tiger;
Bagula, the heron; Bahra, a cook; Bhatia, a brinjal or egg-plant; Bīsi, the
scorpion; Basantia, the trunk of the cotton tree; Hathia, an elephant;
Jancher, a tree (this barga is divided into Bada and Kachcha, the Bada
worshipping the tree and the Kachcha a branch of it, and marriage between
the two subdivisions is allowed); Jharia (this barga keeps a lock of a child’s
hair unshaved for four or five years after its birth); Juadi, a gambler; Karsa,
a deer; Khairaiya, the khair or catechu tree; Lodhi, born from the caste of
that name (in Saugor); Markām, the name of a Gond sept; Rājhans, a swan;
Suriya Bansia, from the sun (members of this barga feed the caste-fellows
on the occasion of a solar eclipse and throw away their earthen pots);
Silgainya from sil, a slate; and Tiparia from tipari, a basket (these two septs
are divided into Kachcha and Pakka groups which can marry with each
other); Sona, gold (a member of this sept does not wear gold ornaments
until he has given a feast and a caste-fellow has placed one on his person).

4. Marriage

Marriage is usually adult, but in places where the Savars live near Hindus
they have adopted early marriage. A reason for preferring the latter custom
is found in the marriage ceremony, when the bride and bridegroom must be
carried on the shoulders of their relatives from the bride’s house to the
bridegroom’s. If they are grown up, this part of the ceremony entails no
inconsiderable labour on the relatives. In the Uriya country, while the
Khuntia subdivision of each barga see nothing wrong in marrying a girl
after adolescence, the Jorias consider it a great sin, to avoid which they
sometimes marry a girl to an arrow before she attains puberty. An arrow is
tied to her hand, and she goes seven times round a mahua branch stuck on
an improvised altar, and drinks ghī and oil, thus creating the fiction of a
marriage. The arrow is then thrown into a river to imply that her husband is
dead, and she is afterwards disposed of by the ceremony of widow-
marriage. If this mock ceremony has not been performed before the girl

Page 628

becomes adult, she is taken to the forest by a relative and there tied to a
tree, to which she is considered to be married. She is not taken back to her
father’s house but to that of some relative, such as her brother-in-law or
grandfather, who is permitted to talk to her in an obscene and jesting
manner, and is subsequently disposed of as a widow. Or in Sambalpur she
may be nominally married to an old man and then again married as a
widow. The Savars follow generally the local Hindu form of the marriage
ceremony. On the return of the bridal pair seven lines are drawn in front of
the entrance to the bridegroom’s house. Some relative takes rice and throws
it at the persons returning with the marriage procession, and then pushes the
pair hastily across the lines and into the house. They are thus freed from the
evil spirits who might have accompanied them home and who are kept back
by the rice and the seven lines. A price of Rs. 5 is sometimes paid for the
bride. In Saugor if the bride’s family cannot afford a wedding feast they
distribute small pieces of bread to the guests, who place them in their head-
cloths to show their acceptance of this substitute. To those guests to whom
it is necessary to make presents five cowries are given. Widow-marriage is
allowed, and in some places the widow is bound to marry her late husband’s
younger brother unless he declines to take her. If she marries somebody else
the new husband pays a sum by way of compensation either to her father or
to the late husband’s family. Divorce is permitted on the husband’s initiative
for adultery or serious disagreement. If the wife wishes for a divorce she
simply runs away from her husband. The Laria Savars must give a mārti-jīti
kā bhāt or death-feast on the occasion of a divorce. The Uriyas simply pay a
rupee to the headman of the caste.

5. Death ceremonies

The Savars both burn and bury their dead, placing the corpse on the pyre
with its head to the north, in the belief that heaven lies in that direction. On
the eleventh day after the death in Sambalpur those members of the caste
who can afford it present a goat to the mourners. The Savars believe that the
souls of those who die become ghosts, and in Bundelkhand they used

Page 629

formerly to bury the dead near their fields in the belief that the spirits would
watch over and protect the crops. If a man has died a violent death they
raise a small platform of earth under a teak or sāj tree, in which the ghost of
the dead man is believed to take up its residence, and nobody thereafter
may cut down that tree. The Uriya Savars take no special measures unless
the ghost appears to somebody in a dream and asks to be worshipped as
Baghiapāt (tiger-eaten) or Masān (serpent-bitten). In such cases a gunia or
sorcerer is consulted, and such measures as he prescribes are taken to
appease the dead man’s soul. If a person dies without a child a hole is made
in a stone, and his soul is induced to enter it by the gunia. A few grains of
rice are placed in the hole, and it is then closed with melted lead to imprison
the ghost, and the stone is thrown into a stream so that it may never be able
to get out and trouble the family. Savars offer water to the dead. A second
wife usually wears a metal impression of the first wife by way of
propitiation to her.

6. Religion

The Savars worship Bhawāni under various names and also Dūlha Deo, the
young bridegroom who was killed by a tiger. He is located in the kitchen of
every house in some localities, and this has given rise to the proverb, ‘Jai
chūlha, tai Dūlha,’ or ‘There is a Dūlha Deo to every hearth.’ The Savars
are considered to be great sorcerers. ‘Sawara ke pānge, Rāwat ke bāndhe,’
or ‘The man bewitched by a Savar and the bullock tied up by a Rāwat
(grazier) cannot escape’; and again, ‘Verily the Saonr is a cup of poison.’
Their charms, called Sabari mantras, are especially intended to appease the
spirits of persons who have died a violent death. If one of their family was
seriously ill they were accustomed formerly to set fire to the forest, so that
by burning the small animals and insects which could not escape they might
propitiate the angry gods.

Page 630

7. Occupation

The dress of the Savars is of the scantiest. The women wear khilwān or pith
ornaments in the ear, and abstain from wearing nose-rings, a traditional
method of deference to the higher castes. The proverb has it, ‘The
ornaments of the Sawara are gumchi seeds.’ These are the red and black
seeds of Abrus precatorius which are used in weighing gold and silver and
are called rati. Women are tattooed and sometimes men also to avoid being
pierced with a red-hot iron by the god of death. Tattooing is further said to
allay the sexual passion of women, which is eight times more intense than
that of men. Their occupations are the collection of jungle produce and
cultivation. They are very clever in taking honeycombs: ‘It is the Savar who
can drive the black bees from their hive.’ The eastern branch of the caste is
more civilised than the Saonras of Bundelkhand, who still sow juāri with a
pointed stick, saying that it was the implement given to them by Mahādeo
for this purpose. In Saugor and Damoh they employ Brāhmans for marriage
ceremonies if they can afford it, but on other occasions their own caste
priests. In some places they will take food from most castes but in others
from nobody who is not a Savar. Sometimes they admit outsiders and in
others the children only of irregular unions; thus a Gond woman kept by a
Savar would not be recognised as a member of the caste herself but her
children would be Savars. A woman going wrong with an outsider of low
caste is permanently excommunicated.

1 This article is principally based on papers by Munshi Gopīnāth, Naib-Tahsīldār, Sonpur, Mr.
Kālūrām Pachorē, Assistant Settlement Officer, Sambalpur, and Mr. Hīra Lāl, Assistant
Gazetteer Superintendent.

2 Archaeological Reports, vol. xvii. pp. 120, 122.
3 India Census Report (1901), p. 283.

4 Archaeological Reports, vol. xvii. p. 113.

Page 631

5 Crooke’s Tribes and Castes of N.W.P., art Savara.

6 Tribes and Castes of N.W.P., art. Savara.
7 Tribes and Castes of Bengal, art. Savar.

Page 632

Page 633

Sonjhara
List of Paragraphs

1. Origin and constitution of the caste
2. Totemism
3. Marriage
4. Customs at birth
5. Funeral rites
6. Religion
7. Social customs
8. Occupation

1. Origin and constitution of the caste

Sonjhara, Jhara, Jhora, Jhira.—A small occupational caste who wash for
gold in river-beds, belonging to the Sambalpur, Mandla, Bālāghāt and
Chānda Districts and the Chota Nāgpur Feudatory States. In 1911 they
numbered about 1500 persons. The name probably comes from sona, gold,
and jhārna, to sweep or wash, though, when the term Jhara only is used,
some derive it from jhori a streamlet. Colonel Dalton surmised that the
Sonjharas were an offshoot of the Gonds, and this appears to be
demonstrated by the fact that the names of their exogamous septs are
identical with Gond names as Marābi, Tekām, Netām, Dhurwa and Madao.
The Sonjharas of Bilāspur say that their ancestors were Gonds who dwelt at
Lānji in Bālāghāt. The caste relate the tradition that they were condemned by
Mahādeo to perpetual poverty because their first ancestor stole a little gold
from Pārvatis crown when it fell into the river Jamuna (in Chota Nāgpur)
and he was sent to fetch it out. The metal which is found in the river sands

Page 634

they hold to be the remains of a shower of gold which fell for two and a half
days while the Banāphar heroes Alha and Udal were fighting their great
battle with Prithvi Rāj, king of Delhi. The caste is partly occupational, and
recruited from different sources. This is shown by the fact that in Chānda
members of different septs will not eat together, though they are obliged to
intermarry. In Sambalpur the Behra, Pātar, Nāik and Padhān septs eat
together and intermarry. Two other septs, the Kanar and Peltrai who eat
fowls and drink liquor, occupy a lower position, and members of the first
four will not take food from them nor give daughters to them in marriage,
though they will take daughters from these lower groups for their sons. Here
they have three subcastes, the Laria or residents of Chhattīsgarh, the Uriya
belonging to the Uriya country, and the Bhuinhār, who may be an offshoot
from the Bhuiya tribe.

2. Totemism

They have one recorded instance of totemism, which is of some interest.
Members of the sept named after a tree called kausa revere the tree and
explain it by saying that their ancestor, when flying from some danger,
sought protection from this tree, which thereupon opened and enfolded him
in its trunk. No member of the sept will touch the tree without first bathing,
and on auspicious occasions, such as births and weddings, they will dig up a
little earth from the roots of the tree and taking this home worship it in the
house. If any member of the sept finds that he has cut off a branch or other
part of this tree unwittingly he will take and consign it to a stream, observing
ceremonies of mourning. Women of the Nāg or cobra sept will not mention
the name of this snake aloud, just as they refrain from speaking the names of
male relatives.

Page 635

3. Marriage

Marriage within the sept is forbidden, and they permit the intermarriage of
the children of a brother and sister, but not of those of two sisters, though
their husbands may be of different septs. Marriage is usually adult except in
Sambalpur, where a girl must be provided with a husband before reaching
maturity in accordance with the general rule among the Uriya castes. In
Chhindwāra it is said that the Sonjharas revere the crocodile and that the
presence of this animal is essential at their weddings. They do not, however,
kill and eat it at a sacrificial feast as the Singrore Dhīmars are reported to do,
but catch and keep it alive, and when the ceremony is concluded take it back
again and deposit it in a river. After a girl has been married neither her father
nor any of her own near relatives will ever take food again in the house of
her husband’s family, saying that they would rather starve. Each married
couple also becomes a separate commensal group and will not eat with the
parents of either of them. This is a common custom among low castes of
mixed origin where every man is doubtful of his neighbour’s parentage.
Divorce and the remarriage of widows are permitted, and a woman may be
divorced merely on the ground of incompetence in household management
or because she does not please her husband’s parents.

4. Customs at birth

At child-birth they make a little separate hut for the mother near the river
where they are encamped, and she remains in it for two days and a half.
During this time her husband does no work; he stays a few paces distant
from his wife’s hut and prepares her food but does not go to the hut or touch
her, and he kindles a fire between them. During the first two days the woman

Page 636

gets three handfuls of rice boiled thin in water, and on the third day she
receives nothing until the evening, when the Sendia or head of the sept takes
a little cowdung, gold and silver in his hand, and pouring water over this
gives her of it to drink as many times as the number of gods worshipped by
her family up to seven. Then she is pure. On this day the father sacrifices a
chicken and gives a meal with liquor to the caste and names the child,
calling it after one of his ancestors who is dead. Then an old woman beats on
a brass plate and calls out the name which has been given in a loud voice to
the whole camp so that they may all know the child’s name. In Bilāspur the
Sonjharas observe the custom of the Couvade, and for six days after the birth
of a child the husband lies prone in his house, while the wife gets up and
goes to work, coming home to give suck to the child when necessary. The
man takes no food for three days and on the fourth is given ginger and raw
sugar, thus undergoing the ordinary treatment of a woman after childbirth.
This is supposed by them to be a sort of compensation for the labours
sustained by the woman in bearing the child. The custom obtains among
some other primitive races, but is now rapidly being abandoned by the
Sonjharas.

5. Funeral rites

The bodies of the old are cremated as a special honour, and those of other
persons are buried. No one other than a member of the dead man’s family
may touch his corpse under a penalty of five rupees. A relative will remove
the body and bury it with the feet pointing to the river or burn it by the
water’s edge. They mourn a child for one day and an adult for four days, and
at the end the mourner is shaved and provides liquor for the community. If
there be no relative, since no other man can touch the corpse, they fire the
hut over it and burn it as it is lying or bury hut and body under a high mound
of sand.

Page 637

6. Religion

Their principal deities are Dūlha Deo, the boy bridegroom, Nira his servant,
and Kauria a form of Devi. Nira lives under an ūmar1 tree and he and Dūlha
Deo his master are worshipped every third year in the month of Māgh
(January). Kauria is also worshipped once in three years on a Sunday in the
month of Māgh with an offering of a cocoanut, and in her honour they never
sit on a cot nor sleep on a stool because they think that the goddess has her
seat on these articles. The real reason, however, is probably that the
Sonjharas consider the use of such furniture an indication of a settled life
and permanent residence, and therefore abjure it as being wanderers. Some
analogous customs have been recorded of the Banjāras. They also revere the
spirit of one of their female ancestors who became a Sati. They sacrifice a
goat to the genius loci or spirit haunting the spot where they decide to start
work; and they will leave it for fear of angering this spirit, which is said to
appear in the form of a tiger, should they make a particularly good find.2
They never keep dogs, and it is said that they are defiled by the touch of a
dog and will throw away their food if one comes near them during their
meal. The same rule applies to a cat, and they will throw away an earthen
vessel touched by either of these animals. On the Diwālī day they wash their
implements, and setting them up near the huts worship them with offerings
of a cocoanut and vermilion.

7. Social customs

Their rule is always to camp outside a village at a distance of not less than a
mile. In the rains they make huts with a roof of bamboos sloping from a
central ridge and walls of matting. The huts are built in one line and do not

Page 638

touch each other, at least a cubit’s distance being left between each. Each hut
has one door facing the east. As a rule they avoid the water of village wells
and tanks, though it is not absolutely forbidden. Each man digs a shallow
well in the sand behind his hut and drinks the water from it, and no man may
drink the water of his neighbour’s well; if he should do so or if any water
from his well gets into his neighbour’s, the latter is abandoned and a fresh
one made. If the ground is too swampy for wells they collect the water in
their wooden washing-tray and fill their vessels from it. In the cold weather
they make little leaf-huts on the sand or simply camp out in the open, but
they must never sleep under a tree. When living in the open each family
makes two fires and sleeps together between them. Some of them have their
stomachs burned and blackened from sleeping too near the fire. The
Sonjharas will not take cooked food from the hands of any other caste, but
their social status is very low, about equivalent to that of the parent Gond
tribe. They have no fear of wild animals, not even the children. Perhaps they
think that as fellow-denizens of the jungle these animals are kin to them and
will not injure them.

8. Occupation

The traditional occupation of the caste is to wash gold from the sandy beds
of streams, while they formerly also washed for diamonds at Hirākud on the
Mahānadi near Sambalpur and at Wairāgarh in Chanda. The industry is
decaying, and in 1901 only a quarter of the total number of Sonjharas were
still employed In it. Some have become cultivators and fishermen, while
others earn their livelihood by sweeping up the refuse dirt of the workshops
of goldsmiths and brass-workers; they wash out the particles of metal from
this and sell it back to the Sunārs. The Mahānadi and Jonk rivers in
Sambalpur, the Banjar In Mandla, the Son and other rivers in Bālāghāt, and
the Wainganga and the eastern streams of Chānda contain minute particles of
gold. The washers earn a miserable and uncertain livelihood, and indeed
appear not to desire anything beyond a bare subsistence. In Bhandāra3 it is
said that they avoid any spot where they have previously been lucky, while

Page 639

in Chānda they have a superstition that a person making a good find of gold
will be childless, and hence many dread the search.4 When they set out to
look for gold they wash three small trayfuls at three places about five cubits
apart. If they find no appreciable quantity of gold they go on for one or two
hundred yards and wash three more trayfuls, and proceed thus until they find
a profitable place where they will halt for two or three days. A spot5 in the
dry river-bed is usually selected at the outside of a bend, where the finer
sediment is likely to be found; after removing the stones and pebbles from
above, the sand below is washed several times in circular wooden cradles,
shaped like the top of an umbrella, of diminishing sizes, until all the clay is
removed and fine particles of sand mixed with gold are visible. A large
wooden spoon is used to stir up the sediment, which is washed and rubbed
by hand to separate the gold more completely from the sand, and a blackish
residue is left, containing particles of gold and mercury coloured black with
oxide of iron. Mercury is used to pick up the gold with which it forms an
amalgam. This is evaporated in a clay cupel called a ghariya by which the
mercury is got rid of and the gold left behind.

1 F. glomerata.
2 Bālāghāt Gazetteer, C.E. Low, p. 207.

3 Bhandāra Settlement Report (A.J. Lawrence), p. 49.
4 Major Lucie Smith’s Chānda Settlement Report (1869), p. 105.

5 The following account of the process of gold-washing is taken from Mr. Low’s Bālāghāt
Gazetteer, p. 201.

Page 640

Sudh
Sudh,1 Sudha, Sudho, Suda.—A cultivating caste in the Uriya country.
Since the transfer of Sambalpur to Bengal only a few Sudhs remain in the
Central Provinces. They are divided into four subcastes—the Bada or high
Sudhs, the Dehri or worshippers, the Kabāt-konia or those holding the
corners of the gate, and the Butka. These last are the most primitive and
think that Rairākhol is their first home. They relate that they were born of
the Pāndava hero Bhīmsen and the female demon Hedembiki, and were
originally occupied in supplying leaves for the funeral ceremonies of the
Pāndava brothers, from which business they obtained their name of Butka or
‘one who brings leaves.’ They are practically a forest tribe and carry on
shifting cultivation like the Khonds. According to their own story the
ancestors of the Butka Sudhs once ruled In Rairākhol and reclaimed the land
from the forest, that is so far as it has been reclaimed. The following story
connects them with the ruling family of Rairākhol. In former times there was
constant war between Bāmra and Rairākhol, and on one occasion the whole
of the Rairākhol royal family was destroyed with the exception of one boy
who was hidden by a Butka Sudh woman. She placed him in a cradle
supported on four uprights, and when the Bāmra Rāja’s soldiers came to
seek for him the Sudhs swore, “If we have kept him either in heaven or earth
may our god destroy us.” The Bāmra people were satisfied with this reply
and the child was saved, and on coming to manhood he won back his
kingdom. He received the name of Janāmani or ‘Jewel among men,’ which
the family still bear. In consequence of this incident, the Butka Sudhs are
considered by the Rairākhol house as relations on their mother’s side; they
have several villages allotted to them and perform sacrifices for the ruling
family. In some of these villages nobody may sleep on a cot or sit on a high
chair, so as to be between heaven and earth in the position in which the child
was saved. The Bada Sudhs are the most numerous subdivision and have
generally adopted Hindu customs, so that the higher castes will take water
from their hands. They neither drink liquor nor eat fowls, but the other
subcastes do both. The Sudhs have totemistic gotras as Bhallūka (bear),

Page 641

Bāgh (tiger), Ullūka (owl), and others. They also have bargas or family
names as Thākur (lord), Dānaik, Amāyat and Bīshi. The Thākur clan say that
they used to hold the Baud kings in their lap for their coronation, and the
Dānaik used to tie the king’s turban. The Bīshi were so named because of
their skill in arms, and the Amāyat collected materials for the worship of the
Pānch Khanda or five swords. The bargas are much more numerous than the
totemistic septs, and marriage either within the barga or within the sept is
forbidden. Girls must be married before adolescence; and in the absence of a
suitable husband, the girl is married to an old man who divorces her
immediately afterwards, and she may then take a second husband at any time
by the form for widow-remarriage. A betrothal is sealed by tying an areca-
nut in a knot made from the clothes of a relative of each party and pounding
it seven times with a pestle. After the marriage a silver ring is placed in a pot
of water, over the mouth of which a leaf-plate is bound. The bridegroom
pierces the leaf-plate with a knife, and the bride then thrusts her hand
through the hole, picks out the ring and puts it on. The couple then go inside
the house and sit down to a meal. The bridegroom, after eating part of his
food, throws the leavings on to the bride’s plate. She stops eating in
displeasure, whereupon the bridegroom promises her some ornaments, and
she relents and eats his leavings. It is customary for a Hindu wife to eat the
leavings of food of her husband as a mark of her veneration for him. Divorce
and the remarriage of widows are permitted. The Sudhs worship the Pānch
Khanda or five swords, and in the Central Provinces they say that these are a
representation of the five Pāndava brothers, in whose service their first
ancestors were engaged. Their tutelary goddess is Khambeshwari,
represented by a wooden peg (khamba). She dwells in the wilds of the Baud
State and is supposed to fulfil all the desires of the Sudhs. Liquor, goats,
buffaloes, vermilion and swallow-wort flowers are offered to her, the last
two being in representation of blood. The Dehri Sudhs worship a goddess
called Kandrāpat who dwells always on the summits of hills. It is believed
that whenever worship is concluded the roar of her tiger is heard, and the
worshippers then leave the place and allow the tiger to come and take the
offerings. The goddess would therefore appear to be the deified tiger. The
Bada Sudhs rank with the cultivating castes of Sambalpur, but the other three
subcastes have a lower position.

Page 642

1 This article is compiled from a paper by Mr. Bhāgirath Patnāik, Diwān of Rairākhol, and from
notes taken by Mr. Hīra Lāl at Rairākhol.

Page 643

Sunār
List of Paragraphs

1. General notice of the caste
2. Internal structure
3. Marriage and other customs
4. Religion
5. Social position
6. Manufacture of ornaments
7. The sanctity of gold
8. Ornaments. The marriage ornaments
9. Beads and other ornaments
10. Ear-piercing
11. Origin of ear-piercing
12. Ornaments worn as amulets
13. Audhia Sunārs
14. The Sunār as money-changer
15. Malpractices of lower-class Sumārs

1. General notice of the caste

Sunār,1 Sonār, Soni, Hon-Potdār, Sarāf.—The occupational caste of
goldsmiths and silversmiths. The name is derived from the Sanskrit Suvarna
kār, a worker in gold. In 1911 the Sunārs numbered 96,000 persons in the
Central Provinces and 30,000 in Berār. They live all over the Province and
are most numerous in the large towns. The caste appears to be a functional
one of comparatively recent formation, and there is nothing on record as to

Page 644

its origin, except a collection of Brāhmanical legends of the usual type. The
most interesting of these as related by Sir H. Risley is as follows:2

“In the beginning of time, when the goddess Devi was busy with the
construction of mankind, a giant called Sonwa-Daitya, whose body consisted
entirely of gold, devoured her creations as fast as she made them. To baffle
this monster the goddess created a goldsmith, furnished him with the tools of
his art, and instructed him how to proceed. When the giant proposed to eat
him, the goldsmith suggested to him that if his body were polished his
appearance would be vastly improved, and asked to be allowed to undertake
the job. With the characteristic stupidity of his tribe the giant fell into the
trap, and having had one finger polished was so pleased with the result that
he agreed to be polished all over. For this purpose, like Aetes in the Greek
legend of Medea, he had to be melted down, and the goldsmith, who was to
get the body as his perquisite, giving the head only to Devi, took care not to
put him together again. The goldsmith, however, overreached himself. Not
content with his legitimate earnings, he must needs steal a part of the head,
and being detected in this by Devi, he and his descendants were condemned
to be for ever poor.” The Sunārs also have a story that they are the
descendants of one of two Rājpūt brothers, who were saved as boys by a
Sāraswat Brāhman from the wrath of Parasurāma when he was destroying
the Kshatriyas. The descendants of the other brother were the Khatris. This
is the same story as is told by the Khatris of their own origin, but they do not
acknowledge the connection with Sunārs, nor can the Sunārs allege that
Sāraswat Brāhmans eat with them as they do with Khatris. In Gujarāt they
have a similar legend connecting them with Banias. In Bombay they also
claim to be Brāhmans, and in the Central Provinces a caste of goldsmiths
akin to the Sunārs call themselves Vishwa Brāhmans. On the other hand,
before and during the time of the Peshwas, Sunārs were not allowed to wear
the sacred thread, and they were forbidden to hold their marriages in public,
as it was considered unlucky to see a Sunār bridegroom. Sunār bridegrooms
were not allowed to see the state umbrella or to ride in a palanquin, and had
to be married at night and in secluded places, being subject to restrictions
and annoyances from which even Mahārs were free.3 Their raison d’être
may possibly be found in the fact that the Brāhmans, all-powerful in the
Poona state, were jealous of the pretensions of the Sunārs, and devised these

Page 645

rules as a means of suppressing them. It may be suggested that the Sunārs,
being workers at an important urban industry, profitable in itself and
sanctified by its association with the sacred metal gold, aspired to rank
above the other artisans, and put forward the pretensions already mentioned,
because they felt that their position was not commensurate with their deserts.
But the Sunār is included in Grant-Duff’s list of the twenty-four village
menials of a Marātha village, and consequently he would in past times have
ranked below the cultivators, from whom he must have accepted the annual
presents of grain.

2. Internal structure

The caste have a number of subdivisions, nearly all of which are of the
territorial class and indicate the various localities from which it has been
recruited in these Provinces. The most important subcastes are the Audhia
from Ajodhia or Oudh; the Purānia or old settlers; the Bundelkhandi from
Bundelkhand; the Mālwi from Mālwa; the Lād from Lāt, the old name for
the southern portion of Gujarāt; and the Mair, who appear to have been the
first immigrants from Upper India and are named after Mair, the original
ancestor, who melted down the golden demon. Other small groups are the
Pātkars, so called because they allow pāt or widow-marriage, though, as a
matter of fact, it is permitted by the great majority of the caste; the Pāndhare
or ‘White Sunārs’; and the Ahīr Sunārs, whose ancestors must presumably
have belonged to the caste whose name they bear. The caste have also
numerous bainks or exogamous septs, which differ entirely from the long
lists given for Bengal and the United Provinces, and show, as Mr. Crooke
remarks, the extreme fertility with which sections of this kind spring up. In
the Central Provinces the names are of a titular or territorial nature.
Examples of the former kind, that is, a title or nickname supposed to have
been borne by the sept’s founder, are: Dantele, one who has projecting teeth;
Kāle, black; Munde, bald; Kolhīmāre, a killer of jackals; and Ladaiya, a
jackal or a quarrelsome person. Among the territorial names are Narwaria
from Narwar; Bhilsainyān from Bhilsa; Kanaujia from Kanauj; Dillīwāl

Page 646

from Delhi; Kālpiwāl from Kālpi. Besides the bainks or septs by which
marriage is regulated, they have adopted the Brāhmanical eponymous gotra-
names as Kashyap, Garg, Sāndilya, and so on. These are employed on
ceremonial occasions as when a gift is made for the purpose of obtaining
religious merit, and the gotra- name of the owner is recorded, but they do
not influence marriage. The use of them is a harmless vanity analogous to
the assumption of distinguished surnames by people who were not born to
them.

3. Marriage and other customs

Marriage is forbidden within the sept. In some localities persons descended
from a common ancestor may not intermarry for five generations, but in
others a brother’s daughter may be wedded to a sister’s son. A man is
forbidden to marry two sisters while both are alive, and after his wife’s death
he may espouse her younger sister, but not her elder one. Girls are usually
wedded at a tender age, but some Sunārs have hitherto had a rule that neither
a girl nor a boy should be married until they had had smallpox, the idea
being that there can be no satisfactory basis for a contract of marriage while
either party is still exposed to such a danger to life and personal appearance;
just as it might be considered more prudent not to buy a young dog until it
had had distemper. But with the spread of vaccination the Sunārs are giving
up this custom. The marriage ceremony follows the Hindustāni or Marātha
ritual according to locality.4 In Betūl the mother of the bride ties the mother
of the bridegroom to a pole with the ropes used for tethering buffaloes and
beats her with a piece of twisted cloth, until the bridegroom’s mother gives
her a present of money or cloth and is released. The ceremony may be
designed to express the annoyance of the bride’s mother at being deprived of
her daughter. Polygamy is permitted, but people will not give their daughter
to a married man if they can find a bachelor husband for her. Well-to-do
Sunārs who desire increased social distinction prohibit the marriage of
widows, but the caste generally allow it.

Page 647

4. Religion

The caste venerate the ordinary Hindu deities, and many of them have sects
and return themselves as Vaishnavas, Saivas or Sāktas. In some places they
are said to make a daily offering to their melting-furnace so that it may bring
them in a profit. When a child has been born they make a sacrifice of a goat
to Dūlha Deo, the marriage-god, on the following Dasahra festival, and the
body of this must be eaten by the family only, no outsider being allowed to
participate. In Hoshangābād it is stated that on the night before the Dasahra
festival all the Sunārs assemble beside a river and hold a feast. Each of them
is then believed to take an oath that he will not during the coming year
disclose the amount of the alloy which a fellow-craftsman may mix with the
precious metals. Any Sunār who violates this agreement is put out of caste.
On the 15th day of Jeth (May) the village Sunār stops work for five days and
worships his implements after washing them. He draws pictures of the
goddess Devi on a piece of paper and goes round the village to affix them to
the doors of his clients, receiving in return a small present.

The caste usually burn their dead and take the ashes to the Nerbudda or
Ganges; those living to the south of the Nerbudda always stop at this river,
because they think that if they crossed it to go to the Ganges, the Nerbudda
would be offended at their not considering it good enough. If a man meets
with a violent death and his body is lost, they construct a small image of him
and burn this with all the proper ceremonies. Mourning is observed for ten or
thirteen days, and the shrāddh ceremony is performed on the anniversary of
a death, while the usual oblations are offered to the ancestors during the
fortnight of Pitr Paksh in Kunwār (September).

Page 648

5. Social position

The more ambitious members of the caste abjure all flesh and liquor, and
wear the sacred thread. These will not take cooked food even from a
Brāhman. Others do not observe these restrictions. Brāhmans will usually
take water from Sunārs, especially from those who wear the sacred thread.
Owing to their association with the sacred metal gold, and the fact that they
generally live in towns or large villages, and many of their members are
well-to-do, the Sunārs occupy a fairly high position, ranking equal with, or
above the cultivating castes. But, as already stated, the goldsmith was a
village menial in the Marātha villages, and Sir D. Ibbetson thinks that the Jat
really considers the Sunār to be distinctly inferior to himself.

6. Manufacture of ornaments

The Sunār makes all kinds of ornaments of gold and silver, being usually
supplied with the metal by his customers. He is paid according to the weight
of metal used, the rate varying from four annas to two rupees with an
average of a rupee per tola weight of metal for gold, and from one to two
annas per tola weight of silver.5 The lowness of these rates is astonishing
when compared with those charged by European jewellers, being less than
10 per cent on the value of the metal for quite delicate ornaments. The
reason is partly that ornaments are widely regarded as a means for the safe
keeping of money, and to spend a large sum on the goldsmith’s labour would
defeat this end, as it would be lost on the reconversion of the ornaments into
cash. Articles of elaborate workmanship are also easily injured when worn
by women who have to labour in the fields or at home. These considerations
have probably retarded the development of the goldsmith’s art, except in a

Page 649

few isolated localities where it may have had the patronage of native courts,
and they account for the often clumsy form and workmanship of his
ornaments. The value set on the products of skilled artisans in early times is
nevertheless shown by the statement in M’Crindle’s Ancient India that any
one who caused an artisan to lose the use of an eye or a hand was put to
death.6 In England the jeweller’s profit on his wares is from 33 to 50 per
cent or more, in which, of course, allowance is made for the large amount of
capital locked up in them and the time they may remain on his hands. But
the difference in rates is nevertheless striking, and allowance must be made
for it in considering the bad reputation which the Sunār has for mixing alloy
with the metal. Gold ornaments are simply hammered or punched into shape
or rudely engraved, and are practically never cast or moulded. They are often
made hollow from thin plate or leaf, the interior being filled up with lac.
Silver ones are commonly cast in Saugor and Jubbulpore, but rarely
elsewhere. The Sunār’s trade appears now to be fairly prosperous, but during
the famines it was greatly depressed and many members of the caste took to
other occupations. Many Sunārs make small articles of brass, such as chains,
bells and little boxes. Others have become cultivators and drive the plough
themselves, a practice which has the effect of spoiling their hands, and also
prevents them from giving their sons a proper training. To be a good Sunār
the hands must be trained from early youth to acquire the necessary delicacy
of touch. The Sunār’s son sits all day with his father watching him work and
handling the ornaments. Formerly the Sunār never touched a plough. Like
the Pekin ivory painter—

From early dawn he works;
And all day long, and when night comes the lamp
Lights up his studious forehead and thin hands.

7. The sanctity of gold

Page 650

As already stated, the Sunār obtains some social distinction from working in
gold, which is a very sacred metal with the Hindus. Gold ornaments must
not on this account be worn below the waist, as to do so would be considered
an indignity to the holy material. Marātha and Khedāwāl Brāhman women
will not have ornaments for the head and arms of any baser metal than gold.
If they cannot afford gold bracelets they wear only glass ones. Other castes
should, if they can afford it, wear only gold on the head. And at any rate the
nose-ring and small earrings in the upper ear should be of gold if worn at all.
When a man is at the point of death, a little gold, Ganges water, and a leaf of
the tulsi or basil plant are placed in his mouth, so that these sacred articles
may accompany him to the other world. So valuable as a means of securing
a pure death is the presence of gold in the mouth that some castes have small
pieces inserted into a couple of their upper teeth, in order that wherever and
whenever they may die, the gold may be present to purify them.7 A similar
idea was prevalent in Europe. Aurum potabile8 or drinkable gold was a
favourite nostrum of the Middle Ages, because gold being perfect should
produce perfect health; and patients when in extremis were commonly given
water in which gold had been washed. And the belief is referred to by
Shakespeare:

Therefore, thou best of gold art worst of gold:
Other, less fine in carat, is more precious,
Preserving life in medicine potable.9

The metals which are used for currency, gold, silver and copper, are all held
sacred by the Hindus, and this is easily explained on the grounds of their
intrinsic value and their potency when employed as coin. It may be noted
that when the nickel anna coinage was introduced, it was held in some
localities that the coins could not be presented at temples as this metal was
not sacred.

Page 651

Ornaments

List of Ornaments, from Left to Right.

Three bracelets on top of board, from left to right:—

1.—Anklet, with links like coils of a snake.
2.—Tora, or solid anklet.
3.—Naugrihi, or wristlet of nine planets.

Second row, from left to right:—

4.—Large nathni, or nose-ring.
5.—Another naugrihi.
6.—Bīja, or custard apple worn on head above bindia.

Page 652

7.—Bindia, or ornament worn on head.
8.—Haniel, or necklace of rupees with betel-leaf pendant.

Third row, from left to right:—

9.—Small nathni, or nose-ring.
10.—Bora, or waistband with beads like smallpox postules.
11.—Kantha, or gold necklace.
12.—Bohta, or circlet for upper arm.
13.—Hasli, or necklet like collar-bone.

Fourth row, from left to right:—

14.—Karanphūl or earring like marigold.
15.—Paijan, or hollow tinkling anklet.
16.—Dhara, or earring like shield.
17.—Another anklet.
18.—Another armlet, called “koparbela.”

8. Ornaments. The marriage ornaments

It can scarcely also be doubted in view of this feeling that the wearing of
both gold and silver in ornaments is considered to have a protective magical
effect, like that attributed to charms and amulets. And the suggestion has
been made that this was the object with which all ornaments were originally
worn. Professor Robertson Smith remarks:10 “Jewels, too, such as women
wore in the sanctuary, had a sacred character; the Syriac word for an earring
is c’ dāsha, ‘the holy thing,’ and generally speaking, jewels serve as amulets.
As such they are mainly worn to protect the chief organs of action (the hands
and feet), but especially the orifices of the body, as earrings; nose-rings
hanging over the mouth; jewels on the forehead hanging down and
protecting the eyes.” The precious metals, as has been seen, are usually
sacred among primitive people, and when made into ornaments they have
the same sanctity and protective virtue as jewels. The subject has been

Page 653

treated11 with great fullness of detail by Sir J. Campbell, and the different
ornaments worn by Hindu women of the Central Provinces point to the same
conclusion. The bindia or head ornament of a Marātha Brāhman woman
consists of two chains of silver or gold and in the centre an image of a cobra
erect. This is Shesh-Nāg, the sacred snake, who spreads his hood over all the
lingas of Mahādeo and is placed on the woman’s head to guard her in the
same way. The Kurmis and other castes do not have Shesh-Nāg, but instead
the centre of the bindia consists of an ornament known as bīja, which
represents the custard-apple, the sacred fruit of Sita. The nathni or nose-ring,
which was formerly confined to high-caste women, represents the sun and
moon. The large hoop circle is the sun, and underneath in the part below the
nose is a small segment, which is the crescent moon and is hidden when the
ornament is in wear. On the front side of this are red stones, representing the
sun, and on the underside white ones for the moon. The nathni has some
mysterious connection with a woman’s virtue, and to take off her nose-ring
—nathni utdārna—signifies to dishonour a woman (Platts). In northern
India women wear the nose-ring very large and sometimes cover it with a
piece of cloth to guard it from view or keep it in parda. It is possible that the
practice of Hindu husbands of cutting off the nose of a wife detected in
adultery has some similar association, and is partly intended to prevent her
from again wearing a nose-ring. The toe ornament of a high-caste woman is
called bichhia and it represents a scorpion (bichhu). A ring on the big toe
stands for the scorpion’s head, a silver chain across the foot ending in
another ring on the little toe is his body, and three rings with high projecting
knobs on the middle toes are the joints of his tail folded back. It is of course
supposed that the ornament protects the feet from scorpion bites. These three
ornaments, the bindia, the nathni and the bichhia, must form part of the
Sohāg or wedding dowry of every high-caste Hindu girl in the northern
Districts, and she cannot be married without them. But if the family is poor a
laong or gold stud to be worn in the nose may be substituted for the nose-
ring. This stud, as its name indicates, is in the form of a clove, which is
sacred food and is eaten on fast-days. Burning cloves are often used to brand
children for cold; a fresh one being employed for each mark. A widow may
not wear any of these ornaments; she is always impure, being perpetually
haunted by the ghost of her dead husband, and they could thus be of no

Page 654

advantage to her; while, on the other hand, her wearing them would probably
be considered a kind of sacrilege or pollution of the holy ornaments.

9. Beads and other ornaments

In the Marātha Districts an essential feature of a wedding is the hanging of
the mangal-sūtram or necklace of black beads round the bride’s neck. All
beads which shine and reflect the light are considered to be efficacious in
averting the evil eye, and a peculiar virtue, Sir J. Campbell states, attaches to
black beads. A woman wears the mangalsūtram or marriage string of beads
all her life, and considers that her husband’s life is to some extent bound up
in it. If she breaks the thread she will not say ‘my thread is broken,’ but ‘my
thread has increased’; and she will not let her husband see her until she has
got a new thread, as she thinks that to do so would cause his death. The
many necklaces of beads worn by the primitive tribes and the strings of blue
beads tied round the necks of oxen and ponies have the same end in view. A
similar belief was probably partly responsible for the value set on precious
stones as ornaments, and especially on diamonds, which sparkle most of all.
The pearl is very sacred among the Hindus, and Madrāsis put a pearl into the
mouth at the time of death instead of gold. Partly at least for this purpose
pearls are worn set in a ring of gold in the ear, so that they may be available
at need. Coral is also highly esteemed as an amulet, largely because it is
supposed to change colour. The coral given to babies to suck may have been
intended to render the soft and swollen gums at teething hard like the hard
red stone. Another favourite shape for beads of gold is that of grains of rice,
rice being a sacred grain. The gold ornament called kantha worn on the neck
has carvings of the flowers of the singāra or water-nut This is a holy plant,
the eating of which on fast-days gives purity. Hence women think that water
thrown over the carved flowers of the ornament when bathing will have
greater virtue to purify their bodies. Another favourite ornament is the hamel
or necklace of rupees. The sanctity of coined metal would probably be
increased by the royal image and superscription and also by its virtue as
currency. Mr. Nunn states that gold mohur coins are still made solely for the

Page 655

purpose of ornament, being commonly engraved with the formula of belief
of Islām and worn by Muhammadans as a charm. Suspended to the hamel or
necklace of rupees in front is a silver pendant in the shape of a betel-leaf,
this leaf being very efficacious in magic; and on this is carved either the
image of Hanumān, the god of strength, or a peacock’s feather as a symbol
of Kārtikeya, the god of war. The silver bar necklet known as hasli is
intended to resemble the collar-bone. Children carried in their mother’s cloth
are liable to be jarred and shaken against her body, so that the collar-bone is
bruised and becomes painful. It is thought that the wearing of a silver collar-
bone will prevent this, just as silver eyes are offered in smallpox to protect
the sufferer’s eyes and a silver wire to save his throat from being choked.
Little children sometimes have round the waist a band of silver beads which
is called bora; these beads are meant to resemble the smallpox pustules and
the bora protects the wearer from smallpox. There are usually 84 beads, this
number being lucky among the Hindus. At her wedding a Hindu bride must
wear a wristlet of nine little cones of silver like the kalas or pinnacle of a
temple. This is called nau-graha or nau-giri and represents the nine planets
which are worshipped at weddings—that is, the sun, moon and the five
planets, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, Venus and Saturn, which were known to the
ancients and gave their names to the days of the week in many of the Aryan
languages; while the remaining two are said to have been Rahu and Ketu, the
nodes of the moon and the demons which cause eclipses. The bonhta or
bānkra, the rigid circular bangle on the upper arm, is supposed to make a
woman’s arm stronger by the pressure exercised on the veins and muscles.
Circular ornaments worn on the legs similarly strengthen them and prevent a
woman from getting stiffness or pins and needles in her legs after long
squatting on the ground. The chutka, a large silver ring worn by men on the
big toe, is believed to attract to itself the ends of all the veins and ligaments
from the navel downwards, and hold them all braced in their proper position,
thus preventing rupture.

On their feet children and young girls wear the paijan or hollow anklet with
tinkling balls inside. But when a married woman has had two or three
children she leaves off the paijan and wears a solid anklet like the tora or
kasa. It is now said that the reason why girls wear sounding anklets is that
their whereabouts may be known and they may be prevented from getting

Page 656

into mischief in dark corners. But the real reason was probably that they
served as spirit scarers, which they would do in effect by frightening away
snakes, scorpions and noxious insects; for it is clear that the bites of such
reptiles and insects, which often escape unseen, must be largely responsible
for the vast imaginative fabric of the belief in evil spirits, just as Professor
Robertson Smith demonstrates that the jins or genii of Arabia were really
wild animals.12 In India, owing to the early age of marriage and the
superstitious maltreatment of women at child-birth, the mortality among
girls at this period is very high; and the Hindus, ignorant of the true causes,
probably consider them especially susceptible to the attacks of evil spirits.

10. Ear-piercing

Before treating of ear-ornaments it will be convenient to mention briefly the
custom of ear-piercing. This is universal among Hindus and Muhammadans,
both male and female, and the operation is often performed by the Sunār.
The lower Hindu castes and the Gonds consider piercing the ears to be the
mark of admission to the caste community. It is done when the child is four
or five years old, and till then he or she is not considered to be a member of
the caste and may consequently take food from anybody. The Rāj-Gonds
will not have the ears of their children pierced by any one but a Sunār; and
for this they give him sīdha or a seer13 of wheat, a seer of rice and an anna.
Hindus employ a Sunār when one is available, but if not, an old man of the
family may act. After the piercing a peacock’s feather or some stalks of grass
or straw are put in to keep the hole open and enlarge it. A Hindu girl has her
ear pierced in five places, three being in the upper ear, one in the lobe and
one in the small flap over the orifice. Muhammadans make a large number
of holes all down the ear and in each of these they place a gold or silver ring,
so that the ears are dragged down by the weight. Similarly their women will
have ten or fifteen bangles on the legs. The Hindus also have this custom in
Bhopāl, but if they do it in the Central Provinces they are chaffed with
having become Muhammadans. In the upper ear Hindu women have an
ornament in the shape of the genda or marigold, a sacred flower which is

Page 657

offered to all the deities. The holes in the upper and middle ear are only large
enough to contain a small ring, but that in the lobe is greatly distended
among the lower castes. The tarkhi or Gond ear-ornament consists of a glass
plate fixed on to a stem of ambāri fibre nearly an inch thick, which passes
through the lobe. As a consequence the lower rim is a thin pendulous strip of
flesh, very liable to get torn. But to have the hole torn open is one of the
worst social mishaps which can happen to a woman. She is immediately put
out of caste for a long period, and only readmitted after severe penalties,
equivalent to those inflicted for getting vermin in a wound. When a woman
gets her ear torn she sits weeping in her house and refuses to be comforted.
At the ceremony of readmission a Sunār is sometimes called in who stitches
up the ear with silver thread.14 Low-caste Hindu and Gond women often
wear a large circular embossed silver ornament over the ear which is known
as dhāra or shield and is in the shape of an Indian shield. This is secured by
chains to the hair and apparently affords some support to the lower part of
the ear, which it also covers. Its object seems to be to shield and protect the
lobe, which is so vulnerable in a woman, and hence the name. A similar
ornament worn in Bengal is known as dhenri and consists of a shield-shaped
disk of gold, worn on the lobe of the ear, sometimes with and sometimes
without a pendant.15

11. Origin of ear-piercing

The character of the special significance which apparently attaches to the
custom of ear-piercing is obscure. Dr. Jevons considers that it is merely a
relic of the practice of shedding the blood of different parts of the body as an
offering to the deity, and analogous to the various methods of self-
mutilation, flagellation and gashing of the flesh, whose common origin is
ascribed to the same custom. “To commend themselves and their prayers the
Quiches pierced their ears and gashed their arms and offered the sacrifice of
their blood to their gods. The practice of drawing blood from the ears is said
by Bastian to be common in the Orient; and Lippert conjectures that the
marks left in the ears were valued as visible and permanent indications that

Page 658

the person possessing them was under the protection of the god with whom
the worshipper had united himself by his blood offering. In that case earrings
were originally designed, not for ornament, but to keep open and therefore
permanently visible the marks of former worship. The marks or scars left on
legs or arms from which blood had been drawn were probably the origin of
tattooing, as has occurred to various anthropologists.”16 This explanation,
while it may account for the general custom of ear-piercing, does not explain
the special guilt imputed by the Hindus to getting the lobe of the ear torn.
Apparently the penalty is not imposed for the tearing of the upper part of the
ear, and it is not known whether men are held liable as well as women; but
as large holes are not made in the upper ear at all, nor by men in the lobe,
such cases would very seldom occur. The suggestion may be made as a
speculation that the continuous distension of the lobe of the ear by women
and the large hole produced is supposed to have some sympathetic effect in
opening the womb and making child-birth more easy. The tearing of the ear
might then be considered to render, the women incapable of bearing a child,
and the penalties attached to it would be sufficiently explained.

12. Ornaments worn as amulets

The above account of the ornaments of a Hindu woman is sufficient to show
that her profuse display of them is not to be attributed, as is often supposed,
to the mere desire for adornment. Each ornament originally played its part in
protecting some limb or feature from various dangers of the seen or unseen
world. And though the reasons which led to their adoption have now been to
a large extent forgotten and the ornaments are valued for themselves, the
shape and character remain to show their real significance. Women as being
weaker and less accustomed to mix in society are naturally more
superstitious and fearful of the machinations of spirits. And the same
argument applies in greater degree to children. The Hindus have probably
recognised that children are very delicate and succumb easily to disease, and
they could scarcely fail to have done so when statistics show that about a
quarter of all the babies born in India die in the first year of age. But they do

Page 659

not attribute the mortality to its real causes of congenital weakness arising
from the immaturity of the parents, insanitary treatment at and after birth,
unsuitable food, and the general frailty of the undeveloped organism. They
ascribe the loss of their offspring solely to the machinations of jealous
deities and evil spirits, and the envy and admiration of other people,
especially childless women and witches, who cast the evil eye upon them.
And in order to guard against these dangers their bodies are decorated with
amulets and ornaments as a means of protection. But the result is quite other
than that intended, and the ornaments which are meant to protect the
children from the imaginary terrors of the evil eye, in reality merely serve as
a whet to illicit cupidity, and expose them a rich, defenceless prey to the
violence of the murderer and the thief.

13. Audhia Sunārs

The Audhia Sunārs usually work in bell-metal, an alloy of copper or tin and
pewter. When used for ornaments the proportion of tin or pewter is increased
so as to make them of a light colour, resembling silver as far as may be.
Women of the higher castes may wear bell-metal ornaments only on their
ankles and feet, and Marātha and Khedāwāl Brāhmans may not wear them at
all. In consequence of having adopted this derogatory occupation, as it is
considered, the Audhia Sunārs are looked down on by the rest of the caste.
They travel about to the different village markets carrying their wares on
ponies; among these, perhaps, the favourite ornament is the kara or curved
bar anklets, which the Audhia works on to the purchaser’s feet for her,
forcing them over the heels with a piece of iron like a shoe-horn. The
process takes time and is often painful, the skin being rasped by the iron.
The woman is supported by a friend as her foot is held up behind, and is
sometimes reduced to cries and tears. High-caste women do not much affect
the kara as they object to having their foot grasped by the Sunār. They wear
instead a chain anklet which they can work on themselves. The Sunārs set
precious stones in ornaments, and this is also done by a class of persons
called Jadia, who do not appear to be a caste. Another body of persons

Page 660

accessory to the trade are the Niārīas, who take the ashes and sweepings
from the goldsmith’s shop, paying a sum of ten or twenty rupees annually for
them.17 They wash away the refuse and separate the grains of gold and
silver, which they sell back to the Sunārs. Niāria also appears to be an
occupational term, and not a caste.

14. The Sunār as money-changer

Formerly Sunārs were employed for counting and testing money in the
public treasuries, and in this capacity they were designated as Potdār and
Sarāf or Shroff. Before the introduction of the standard English coinage the
money-changer’s business was important and profitable, as the rupee varied
over different parts of the country exactly as grain measures do now. Thus
the Pondicherry rupee was worth 26 annas, while the Gujarat rupee would
not fetch 12½ annas in the bazār. In Bengal,18 at the beginning of the
nineteenth century, people who wished to make purchases had first to
exchange their rupees for cowries. The Potdar carried his cowries to market
in the morning on a bullock, and gave 5760 cowries for a new kaldār or
English rupee, while he took 5920 cowries in exchange for a rupee when his
customers wanted silver back in the evening to take away with them. The
profit on the kaldār rupee was thus one thirty-sixth on the two transactions,
while all old rupees, and every kind of rupee but the kaldār, paid various
rates of exchange or batta, according to the will of the money-changers, who
made a higher profit on all other kinds of money than the kaldār. They
therefore resisted the general introduction of these rupees as long as
possible, and when this failed they hit on a device of marking the rupees
with a stamp, under pretext of ascertaining whether they were true or false;
after which the rupee was not exchangeable without paying an additional
batta, and became as valuable to the money-changers as if it were foreign
coin. As justification for their action they pretended to the people that the
marks would enable those who had received the rupees to have them
changed should any other dealer refuse them, and the necessities of the poor
compelled them to agree to any batta or exchange rather than suffer delay.

Page 661

This was apparently the origin of the ‘Shroff-marked rupees,’ familiar to
readers of the Treasury Manual; and the line in a Bhāt song, ‘The English
have made current the kaldār (milled) rupee,’ is thus seen to be no empty
praise.

15. Malpractices of lower-class Sumārs

As the bulk of the capital of the poorer classes is hoarded in the shape of
gold and silver ornaments, these are regularly pledged when ready money is
needed, and the Sunār often acts as a pawnbroker. In this capacity he too
often degenerates into a receiver of stolen property, and Mr. Nunn suggested
that his proceedings should be supervised by license. Generally, the Sunār is
suspected of making an illicit profit by mixing alloy with the metal entrusted
to him by his customers, and some bitter sayings are current about him. One
of his customs is to filch a little gold from his mother and sister on the last
day of Shrāwan (July) and make it into a luck-penny.19 This has given rise to
the saying, ‘The Sunār will not respect even his mother’s gold’; but the
implication appears to be unjust. Another saying is: ‘Sona Sunār kā, abharan
sansār ka,’ or, ‘The ornament is the customer’s, but the gold remains with
the Sunār.’20 Gold is usually melted in the employer’s presence, who, to
guard against fraud, keeps a small piece of the metal called chāsnī or māslo,
that is a sample, and when the ornament is ready sends it with the sample to
an assayer or Chokshi who, by rubbing them on a touchstone, tells whether
the gold in the sample and the ornament is of the same quality. Further, the
employer either himself sits near the Sunār while the ornament is being
made or sends one of his family to watch. In spite of these precautions the
Sunār seldom fails to filch some of the gold while the spy’s attention is
distracted by the prattling of the parrot, by the coquetting of a handsomely
dressed young woman of the family or by some organised mishap in the
inner rooms among the women of the house.21 One of his favourite practices
is to substitute copper for gold in the interior, and this he has the best chance
of doing with the marriage ornaments, as many people consider it unlucky to
weigh or test the quality of these.22 The account must, however, be taken to

Page 662

apply only to the small artisans, and well-to-do reputable Sunārs would be
above such practices.

The goldsmith’s industry has hitherto not been affected to any serious extent
by the competition of imported goods, and except during periods of
agricultural depression the Sunār continues to prosper.

A Persian couplet said by a lover to his mistress is, ‘Gold has no scent and in
the scent of flowers there is no gold; but thou both art gold and hast scent.’

Sundi, Sundhi, Sunri or Sondhi.23—The liquor-distilling caste of the Uriya
country. The transfer of Sambalpur and the Uriya States to Bihār and Orissa
has reduced their strength in the Central Provinces to about 5000, found in
the Raipur District and the Bastar and Chota Nāgpur Feudatory States. The
caste is an important one in Bengal, numbering more than six lakhs of
persons and being found in western Bengal and Bihār as well as in Orissa.
The word Sundi is derived from the Sanskrit Shaundik, a spirit-seller. The
caste has various genealogies of differing degrees of respectability, tracing
their origin to cross unions between other castes born of Brāhmans,
Kshatriyas, and Vaishyas. The following story is told of them in Madras.24 In
ancient times a certain Brāhman was famous for his magical attainments.
The king of the country sent for him one day and asked him to cause the
water in a tank to burn. The Brāhman saw no way of doing this, and returned
homewards uneasy in his mind. On the way he met a distiller who asked him
to explain what troubled him. When the Brāhman told his story the distiller
promised to cause the water to burn on condition that the Brāhman gave him
his daughter in marriage. This the Brāhman agreed to do, and the distiller,
after surreptitiously pouring large quantities of liquor into the tank, set fire to
it in the presence of the king. In accordance with the agreement he married
the daughter of the Brāhman and the pair became the ancestors of the Sundi
caste. In confirmation of the story it is alleged that up to the present day the
women of the caste maintain the recollection of their Brāhman ancestors by
refusing to eat fowls or the remains of their husbands’ meals. Nor will they
take food from the hands of any other caste. Sir H. Risley relates the
following stories current about the caste in Bengal, where its status is very
low: “According to Hindu ideas, distillers and sellers of strong drink rank

Page 663

among the most degraded castes, and a curious story in the Vaivarta Purāna
keeps alive the memory of their degradation. It is said that when Sani, the
Hindu Saturn, failed to adapt an elephant’s head to the mutilated trunk of
Ganesh who had been accidentally slain by Siva, Viswākarma, the celestial
artificer, was sent for, and by careful dissection and manipulation he fitted
the incongruous parts together, and made a man called Kedāra Sena from the
slices cut off in fashioning his work. This Kedāra Sena was ordered to fetch
a drink of water for Bhagavati, weary and athirst. Finding on the river’s bank
a shell full of water he presented it to her, without noticing that a few grains
of rice left in it by a parrot had fermented and formed an intoxicating liquid.
Bhagavati, as soon as she had drunk, became aware of the fact, and in her
anger condemned the offender to the vile and servile occupation of making
spirituous liquors for mankind.” Like other castes in Sambalpur the Sundis
have two subcastes, the Jhārua and the Utkal or Uriya, of whom the Jhāruas
probably immigrated from Orissa at an earlier period and adopted some of
the customs of the indigenous tribes; for this reason they are looked down on
by the more orthodox Utkalis. The caste say that they belong to the Nāgas or
snake gotra, because they consider themselves to be descended from Bāsuki,
the serpent with a thousand heads who formed a canopy for Vishnu. They
also have bargas or family titles, but these at present exercise no influence
on marriage. The Sundis have in fact outgrown the system of exogamy and
regulate their marriages by a table of prohibited degrees in the ordinary
manner, the unions of sapindas or persons who observe mourning together at
a death being prohibited. The prohibition does not extend to cognatic
relationship, but a man must not marry into the family of his paternal aunt.
The fact that the old bargas or exogamous groups are still in existence is
interesting, and an intermediate step in the process of their abandonment
may be recognised in the fact that some of them are subdivided. Thus the
Sāhu (lord) group has split into the Gaj Sāhu (lord of the elephant), Dhavila
Sāhu (white lord), and Amila Sāhu sub-groups, and it need not be doubted
that this was a convenient method adopted for splitting up the Sāhu group
when it became so large as to include persons so distantly connected with
each other that the prohibition of marriage between them was obviously
ridiculous. As the number of Sundis in the Central Provinces is now
insignificant no detailed description of their customs need be given, but one
or two interesting points may be noted. Their method of observing the

Page 664

pitripaksh or worship of ancestors is as follows: A human figure is made of
kusha grass and placed under a miniature straw hut. A lamp is kept burning
before it for ten days, and every day a twig for cleaning the teeth is placed
before it, and it is supplied with fried rice in the morning and rice, pulse and
vegetables in the evening. On the tenth day the priest comes, and after
bathing the figure seven times, places boiled rice before it for the last meal,
and then sets fire to the hut and burns it, while repeating sacred verses. On
the eleventh day after a death, when presents for the use of the deceased are
made to a priest as his representative, the priest lies down in the new bed
which is given to him, and the members of the family rub his feet and attend
on him as if he were the dead man. He is also given a present sufficient to
purchase food for him for a year. The Sundis worship Surādevi or the
goddess of wine, whom they consider as their mother, and they refuse to
drink liquor, saying that this would be to enjoy their own mother. They
worship the still and all articles used in distillation at the rice-harvest and
when the new mango crop appears. Large numbers of them have taken to
cultivation.

1 This article is partly based on an article by Mr. Raghunāth Prasād, E.A.C., formerly Deputy
Superintendent of Census, with extracts from the late Mr. Nunn’s Monograph on the Gold and
Silver Industries, and on information furnished by Krishna Rao, Revenue Inspector, Mandla.

2 Tribes and Castes of Bengal, art. Sunār.
3 Bombay Gazetteer, vol. xvii. p. 134.

4 See articles on Kunbi and Kurmi.
5 Monograph on the Gold and Silverware of the Central Provinces (Mr. H. Nunn, I.C.S.), 1904.
The tola is a rupee’s weight, or two-fifths of an ounce.

6 Journal of Indian Art, July 1909, p. 172.
7 From a monograph on rural customs in Saugor, by Major W.D. Sutherland, I.M.S.

8 Lang, Myth, Ritual and Religion, i. p. 98.
9 2 King Henry IV. Act IV. Sc. 4.

10 Religion of the Semites, note B., p. 453.
11 Bombay Gazetteer, Poona, App. D., Ornaments.

Page 665

12 Religion of the Semites, Lecture III.

13 2 lbs.
14 From a paper on Caste Panchāyats, by the Rev. Failbus, C.M.S. Mission, Mandla.

15 Rājendra Lāl Mitra, Indo-Aryans vol. i. p. 231.
16 Introduction to the History of Religion, 3rd ed. p. 172.

17 Monograph, loc. cit.
18 This account is taken from Buchanan’s Eastern India, vol. ii. p. 100.

19 Bombay Gazetteer, vol. xii. p. 71.
20 Temple and Fallon’s Hindustāni Proverbs.

21 Bombay Gazetteer, Hindus of Gujarāt, pp. 199, 200.
22 Pandīan’s Indian Village Folk, p. 41.

23 This article is compiled from a paper by Mr. D. Mitra, pleader, Sambalpur.
24 Madras Census Report, 1891, p. 301.

Page 666

Tamera

1. The Tamera and Kasār

Tamera, Tambatkar.1—The professional caste of coppersmiths, the name
being derived from tāmba, copper. The Tameras, however, like the Kasārs or
brass-workers, use copper, brass and bell-metal indifferently, and in the
northern Districts the castes are not really distinguished, Tamera and Kasār
being almost interchangeable terms. In the Marātha country, however, and
other localities they are considered as distinct castes. Copper is a sacred
metal, and the copper-smith’s calling would be considered somewhat more
respectable than that of the worker in brass or bell-metal, just as the Sunār or
goldsmith ranks above both; and probably, therefore, the Tameras may
consider themselves a little better than the Kasārs. As brass is an alloy made
from copper and zinc, it seems likely that vessels were made from copper
before they were made from brass. But copper being a comparatively rare
and expensive metal, utensils made from it could scarcely have ever been
generally used, and it is therefore not necessary to suppose that either the
Tamera or Kasār caste came into being before the adoption of brass as a
convenient material for the household pots and pans.

2. Social traditions and customs

In 1911 the Tameras numbered about 5000 persons in the Central Provinces
and Berār. They tell the same story of their origin which has already been

Page 667

related in the article on the Kasār caste, and trace their descent from the
Haihaya Rājpūt dynasty of Ratanpur. They say that when the king
Dharampāl, the first ancestor of the caste, was married, a bevy of 119 girls
were sent with his bride in accordance with the practice still occasionally
obtaining among royal Hindu families, and these, as usual, became the
concubines of the husband or, as the Tameras say, his wives: and from the
bride and her companions the 120 exogamous sections of the caste are
sprung. As a fact, however, many of the sections are named after villages or
natural objects. A man is not permitted to marry any one belonging to his
own section or that of his mother, the union of first cousins being thus
prohibited. The caste also do not favour Anta sānta or the practice of
exchanging girls between families, the reason alleged being that after the
bride’s father has acknowledged the superiority of the bridegroom’s father
by washing his feet, it is absurd to require the latter to do the same, that is, to
wash the feet of his inferior. So they may not take a girl from a family to
which they have given one of their own. The real reason for the rule lies
possibly in an extension of the principle of exogamy, whether based on a real
fear of carrying too far the practice of intermarriage between families or an
unfounded superstition that intermarriage between families already
connected may have the same evil results on the offspring as the union of
blood-relations. When the wedding procession is about to start, after the
bridegroom has been bathed and before he puts on the kankan or iron
wristlet which is to protect him from evil spirits, he is seated on a stool while
all the male members of the household come up with their choti or scalp-
lock untied and rub it against that of the bridegroom. Again, after the
wedding ceremonies are over and the bridegroom has, according to rule,
untied one of the fastenings of the marriage-shed, he also turns over a tile of
the roof of the house. The meaning of the latter ceremony is not clear; the
significance attaching to the choti has been discussed in the article on Nai.

3. Disposal of the dead

Page 668

The caste burn their dead except children, who can be buried, and observe
mourning for ten days in the case of an adult and for three days for a child. A
cake of flour containing two pice (farthings) is buried or burnt with the
corpse. When a death takes place among the community all the members of
it stop making vessels for that day, though they will transact retail sales.
When mourning is over, a feast is given to the caste-fellows and to seven
members of the menial and serving castes. These are known as the ‘Sāttiho
Jāt’ or Seven Castes, and it may be conjectured that in former times they
were the menials of the village and were given a meal in much the same
spirit as prompts an English landlord to give his tenants a dinner on
occasions of ceremony. Instances of a similar custom are noted among the
Kunbis and other castes. Before food is served to the guests a leaf-plate
containing a portion for the deceased is placed outside the house with a pot
of water, and a burning lamp to guide his spirit to the food.

4. Religion

The caste worship the goddess Singhbāhani. or Devi riding on a tiger. They
make an image of her in the most expensive metal they can afford, and
worship it daily. They will on no account swear by this goddess. They
worship their trade implements on the day of the new moon in Chait (March)
and Bhādon (August). A trident, as a symbol of Devi, is then drawn with
powdered rice and vermilion on the furnace for casting metal. A lamp is
waved over the furnace and a cocoanut is broken and distributed to the caste-
fellows, no outsider being allowed to be present. They quench their furnace
on the new moon day of every month, the Rāmnaomi and Durgapūja or nine
days’ fasts in the months of Chait and Kunwār, and for the two days
following the Diwāli and Holi festivals. On these days they will not prepare
any new vessels, but will sell those which they have ready. The Tameras
have Kanaujia Brāhmans for their priests, and the Brāhmans will take food
from them which has been cooked without water and salt. On this account
other Kanaujia Brāhmans require a heavy payment before they will marry
with the priests of the Tameras. The caste abstain from liquor, and some of

Page 669

them have abjured all flesh food while others partake of it. They usually
wear the sacred thread. Brāhmans will take water from their hands, and the
menial castes will eat food which they have touched. They work in brass,
copper and bell-metal in exactly the same manner as the Kasārs, and have an
equivalent social position.

1 This article is based on information: contributed by Nand Kishore, Nāzir of the Deputy
Commissioner’s Office, Damoh; Mr. Tārāchand Dube, Municipal Member, Bilāspur; and Mr.
Adurām Chaudhri of the Gazetteer Office.

Page 670

Taonla
Taonla.—A small non-Aryan caste of the Uriya States. They reside
principally in Bāmra and Sonpur, and numbered about 2000 persons in 1901,
but since the transfer of these States to Bengal are not found in the Central
Provinces. The name is said to be derived from Tālmūl, a village in the
Angul District of Orissa, and they came to Bāmra and Sonpur during the
Orissa famine of 1866. The Taonlas appear to be a low occupational caste of
mixed origin, but derived principally from the Khond tribe. Formerly their
profession was military service, and it is probable that like the Khandaits and
Pāiks they formed the levies of some of the Uriya Rājas, and gradually
became a caste. They have three subdivisions, of which the first consists of
the Taonlas whose ancestors were soldiers. These consider themselves
superior to the others, and their family names as Nāik (leader), Padhān
(chief), Khandait (swordsman), and Behra (master of the kitchen) indicate
their ancestral profession. The other subcastes are called Dāngua and Khond;
the Dānguas, who are hill-dwellers, are more primitive than the military
Taonlas, and the Khonds are apparently members of that tribe of
comparatively pure descent who marry among themselves and not with other
Taonlas. In Orissa Dr. Hunter says that the Taonlas are allied to the Savaras,
and that they will admit a member of any caste, from whose hands they can
take water, into the community. This is also the case in Bāmra. The
candidate has simply to worship Kālapāt, the god of the Taonlas, and after
drinking some water in which basil leaves have been dipped, to touch the
food prepared for a caste feast, and his initiation is complete. As usual
among the mixed castes, female morality is very lax, and a Taonla woman
may have a liaison with a man of her own or any other caste from whom a
Taonla can take water without incurring any penalty whatsoever. A man
committing a similar offence must give a feast to the caste. In Sonpur the
Taonlas admit a close connection with Chasas, and say that some of their
families are descended from the union of Chasa men and Taonla women.
They will eat the leavings of Chasas. The custom may be accounted for by
the fact that the Taonlas are now generally farmservants and field-labourers,

Page 671

and the Chasas, as cultivators, would be their employers. A similar close
connection is observable among other castes standing in the same position
towards each other as the Panwārs and Gonds and the Rājbhars and Lodhis.

The Taonlas have no exogamous divisions as they all belong to the same
gotra, that of the Nāg or cobra. Their marriages are therefore regulated by
relationship in the ordinary manner. If two families find that they have no
common ancestor up to the third generation they consider it lawful to
intermarry. The marriage ritual is of the usual Uriya form. After the marriage
the bride and the bridegroom have a ceremony of throwing a mahua branch
into a river together. Divorce and widow remarriage are permitted. When a
woman is divorced she returns her bangles to her husband, and receives from
him a chhor-chitthi or letter severing connection. Then she goes before the
caste panchāyat and pronounces her husband’s name aloud. This shows that
she is no longer his wife, since so long as she continued to be so, she would
never mention his name.

The tutelary deity of the caste is Kālapāt, who resides at Tālmūl in Angul
District. They offer him a goat at the festival of Nawākhai when the new rice
is first eaten. On this day they also worship a cattle-goad as the symbol of
their vocation. They revere the cobra, and will not wear wooden sandals
because they think that the marks on a cobra’s head are in the form of a
sandal. They believe in re-birth, and when a child is born they proceed to
ascertain what ancestor has become reincarnate by dropping rice grains
coloured with turmeric into a pot of water. As each one is dropped they
repeat the name of an ancestor, and when the first grain floats conclude that
the one named has been born again. The dead are both buried and burnt. At
the head of a grave they plant a bough of the jāmun tree (Eugenia
jambolana) so that the departed spirit may dwell under this cool and shady
tree in the other world or in his next birth. They have also a ceremony for
bringing back the soul. An earthen pot is placed upside down on four legs
outside the village, and on the eleventh day after a death they proceed to the
place, ringing a bell suspended to an iron rod. A cloth is spread before the
spot on which the spirit of the deceased is supposed to be sitting, and they
wait till an insect alights on it. This is taken to be the soul of the dead
person, and it is carefully wrapped up in the cloth and carried to the house.

Page 672

There the cloth is unfolded and the insect allowed to go, while they proceed
to inspect some rice-flour which has been spread on the ground under
another pot in the house. If any mark is found on the surface of the flour they
think that the dead man’s spirit has returned to the house. The carrying back
of the insect is thus an act calculated to assist their belief, by the simple
performance of which they are able to suppose more easily that the invisible
spirit has returned to the house. As already stated, the Taonlas are now
generally farmservants and labourers, and their social position is low, though
they rank above the impure castes and the forest tribes.

Page 673

Teli
List of Paragraphs

1. Strength and distribution of the caste
2. Origin and traditions
3. Endogamous subcastes
4. Exogamous divisions
5. Marriage customs
6. Widow-remarriage
7. Religion: Caste deities
8. Driving out evil
9. Customs at birth and death
10. Social status
11. Social customs and caste penalties
12. The Rāthor Telis
13. Gujarāti Telis of Nimār
14. The Teli an unlucky caste
15. Occupation. Oil-pressing
16. Trade and agriculture
17. Teli beneficence

1. Strength and distribution of the caste

Teli.1—The occupational caste of oil-pressers and sellers. The Telis
numbered nearly 900,000 persons in 1911, being the fifth caste in the
Province in point of population. They are numerous in the Chhattīsgarh and
Nāgpur Divisions, nearly 400,000 belonging to the former and 200,000 to
the latter tract; while in Berār and the north of the Province they are sparsely

Page 674

represented. The reason for such a distribution of the caste is somewhat
obscure. Vegetable oil is more largely used for food in the south and east
than in the north, but while this custom might explain the preponderance of
Telis in Nāgpur and Chhattīsgarh it gives no reason to account for their small
numbers in Berār. In Chhattīsgarh again nearly all the Telis are cultivators,
and it may be supposed that, like the Chamārs, they have found opportunity
here to get possession of the land owing to its not being already taken up by
the cultivating castes proper; but in the Nāgpur Division, with the exception
of part of Wardha, the Telis have had no such opening and are not large
landholders. Their distribution thus remains a somewhat curious problem.
But all over the Province the Telis have generally abandoned their hereditary
trade of pressing oil, and have taken to trade and agriculture, the number of
those returned as oil-pressers being only about seven per cent of the total
strength of the caste. The name comes from the Sanskrit tailika or taila, oil,
and this word, is derived from the tilli or sesamum plant.

2. Origin and traditions

The caste have few traditions of origin. Their usual story is that during
Siva’s absence the goddess Pārvati felt nervous because she had no
doorkeeper to her palace, and therefore she made the god Ganesh from the
sweat of her body and set him to guard the southern gate. But when Siva
returned Ganesh did not know him and refused to let him enter; on which
Siva was so enraged that he cut off the head of Ganesh with a stroke of his
sword. He then entered the palace, and Pārvati, observing the blood on his
sword, asked him what had happened, and reproached him bitterly for
having slain her son. Siva was distressed, but said that he could not replace
the head as it was already reduced to ashes. But he said that if any animal
could be found looking towards the south he could put its head on Ganesh
and bring him to life. As it happened a trader was then resting outside the
palace and had with him an elephant, which was seated with its head to the
south. So Siva quickly struck off the head of the elephant and placed it on
the body of Ganesh and brought him to life again, and thus Ganesh got his

Page 675

elephant’s head. But the trader made loud lamentation about the loss of his
elephant, so to pacify him Siva made a pestle and mortar, utensils till then
unknown, and showed him how to pound oil-seeds in them and express the
oil, and enjoined him to earn a livelihood in future by this calling, and his
descendants after him; and so the merchant became the first Teli. And the
pestle was considered to be Siva and the mortar Pārvati. This last statement
affords some support to Mr. Marten’s suggestion2 that a certain veneration
attaching to the pestle and mortar and their use in marriage ceremonies may
be due to the idea of their typifying the male and female organs. The fact
that Ganesh was set to guard the southern gate, and that the animal whose
head could be placed on his body must be looking to the south, probably
hinges in some way on the south being the abode of Yama, the god of death,
but the connection has been forgotten by the teller of the story; it may also
be noted that if the palace was in the Himalayas, the site of Kailās or Siva’s
heaven, the whole of India would be to the south. Another story related by
Mr. Crooke3 from Mīrzāpur is that a certain man had three sons and owned
fifty-two mahua4 trees. When he became aged and infirm he told his sons to
divide the trees, but after some discussion they decided to divide not the
trees themselves but their produce. One of them fell to picking up the leaves,
and he was the ancestor of the Bharbhūnjas or grain-parchers, who still use
leaves in their ovens; the second collected the flowers and corollas, and
having distilled liquor from them became a Kalār; while the third took the
kernels or fruit and crushed the oil out of them, and was the founder of the
Teli caste. The country spirit generally drunk is distilled from the flowers of
the mahua tree, and a cheap vegetable oil in common use is obtained from its
seeds. The Telis and Kalārs are also castes of about the same status and have
other points of resemblance; and the legend connecting them is therefore of
some interest Some groups of Telis who have become landed proprietors or
prospered in trade have stories giving them a more exalted origin. Thus the
landholding Rāthor Telis of Mandla say that they were Rāthor Rājpūts who
fled from the Muhammadans and threw away their swords and sacred
threads; and the Telis of Nimār, several of whom are wealthy merchants,
give out that their ancestors were Modh Banias from Gujarāt who had to
take to oil-pressing for a livelihood under Muhammadan rule. But these
legends may perhaps be considered a natural result of their rise in the world.

Page 676

Teli’s oil-press

3. Endogamous subcastes

The caste has a large number of subdivisions. The principal groups in
Chhattīsgarh are the Halia, Jharia and Ekbahia Telis. The Halias, who
perhaps take their name from hal, a plough, are considered to be the best
cultivators, and are said to have immigrated from Mandla some generations
ago. Probably the bulk of the Hindu population of Chhattīsgarh came from
this direction. The name Jharia means jungly or savage, and is commonly
applied to the oldest residents, but the Jharia Telis are the highest local
subcaste. They require the presence of a Brāhman at their weddings, and
abstain generally from liquor, fowls and pork, to which the Halias are not

Page 677

averse. They also bathe the corpse before it is burnt or buried, an observance
omitted by the Halias. The Jharias yoke only one bullock to the oil-press,
and the Halias two, a distinction which is elsewhere sufficient of itself to
produce separate subcastes. The Ekbahia (one-armed) Telis are so called
because their women wear glass bangles only on the right hand and metal
ones on the left. This is a custom of several castes whose women do manual
labour, and the reason appears to be one of convenience, as glass bangles on
the working arm would be continually getting broken. Among the Ekbahia
Telis it is said that a woman considers it a point of honour to have these
metal bangles as numerous and heavy as her arm can bear; and at a wedding
a present of three bracelets from the bridegroom to the bride is held to be
indispensable. The Madpotwa are a small subcaste living near the hills, who
in former times distilled liquor; they keep pigs and poultry, and rank below
the others. Other groups are the Kosarias, who are called after Kosala, the
old name of Chhattīsgarh, and the Chhote or Little Telis, who are of
illegitimate descent. Children born out of wedlock are relegated to this
group.

In the Nāgpur country the principal subdivisions are the Ekbaile and
Dobaile, so called because they yoke one and two bullocks respectively to
the oil-press; the distinction is still maintained, the Dobaile being also
known as Tarāne. This seems a trivial reason for barring intermarriage, but it
must be remembered that the yoking of the bullock to the oil-press, coupled
as it is with the necessity of blindfolding the animal, is considered a great sin
on the Teli’s part and a degrading incident of his profession; the Teli’s worst
fear is that after death his soul will pass into one of his own bullocks. The
Yerande Telis are so called because they formerly pressed only the erandi or
castor-oil seed, but the rule is no longer maintained. The Yerande women
leave off wearing the choli or breast-cloth after they have had one child, and
have nothing under the sāri or body-cloth, but they wear this folded double.
The Ruthia group are said to be so called from the noise rut, rut made by the
oil-mill in turning. They say they are descended from the Nāg or cobra. They
salute the snake when they see it and refrain from killing it, and they will not
make any drawing or sign having the semblance of a snake or use any article
which may be supposed to be like it. The Sao Telis are the highest group in
Wardha, and have eschewed the pressing of oil. The word Sao or Sāhu is the

Page 678

title of a moneylender, but they are usually cultivators or village proprietors.
A Brāhman will enter a Sao Teli’s house, but not the houses of any other
subcaste. Their women wear silver bangles on the right hand and glass ones
on the left. The Batri subcaste are said to be so called from their growing the
batar, a kind of pea, and the Hardia from raising the haldi or turmeric. The
Teli-Kalārs appear to be a mixed group of Kalārs who have taken to the
oilman’s profession, and the Teli-Banias are Telis who have become
shopkeepers, and may be expected in the course of time to develop either
into a plebeian group of Banias or an aristocratic one of Telis. In Nimār the
Gujarāti Telis, who have now grown wealthy and prosperous, claim, as
already seen, to be Modh Banias, and the same pretension is put forward by
their fellow-castemen in Gujarāt itself. “The large class of oilmen known in
Gujarāt as Modh-Ghanelis were originally Modh Banias, who by taking to
making and selling oil lost their position as Banias”;5 it seems doubtful,
however, whether the reverse process has not really taken place. The Umre
Telis also have the name of a subcaste of Banias. The landholding Rāthor
Telis of Mandla, who now claim to be Rāthor Rājpūts, will be more fully
noticed later. There are also several local subcastes, as the Mattha or
Marātha Telis, who say they came from Pātan in Gujarāt, the Sirwas from
the ancient city of Srāvasti in Gonda District, and the Kanaujia from Oudh.

4. Exogamous divisions

Each subcaste is divided into a number of exogamous groups for the
regulation of marriages. The names of the groups appear to be taken either
from villages or titles or nicknames. Most of them cannot be recognised, but
the following are a few: Bāghmāre, a tiger-killer; Deshmukh, a village
officer; Vaidya, a physician; Bāwankule, the fifty-two septs; Badwāik, the
great ones; Satpute, seven sons; Bhājikhāya, an eater of vegetables;
Satapaise, seven pice; Ghoremādia, a horse-killer; Chaudhri, a caste
headman; Ardona, a kind of gram; Malghāti, a valley; Chandan-malāgar, one
who presented sandalwood; and Sanichara, born on Saturday. Three septs,
Dhurwa, Besrām, a hawk, and Sonwāni, gold-water, belong to the Gonds or

Page 679

other tribes. The clans of the Rāthor Telis of Mandla are said to be named
after villages in Jubbulpore and Maihar State.

5. Marriage customs

The marriage of persons of the same sept and of first cousins is usually
forbidden. A man may marry his wife’s younger sister while she herself is
alive, but never her elder sister. An unmarried girl becoming pregnant by a
man of the caste is married to him by the ceremony used for a widow, and
she may be readmitted even after a liaison with an outsider among most
Telis. In Chānda the parents of a girl who is not married before puberty are
fined. The proposal comes from the boy’s side and a bride-price is usually
paid, though not of large amount. The Halia Telis of Chhattīsgarh, like other
agricultural castes, sometimes betroth their children when they are five or six
months old, but as a rule no penalty attaches to the breaking of the betrothal.
The betrothal is celebrated by the distribution of one or two rupees’ worth of
liquor to the neighbours of the caste. As among other low castes, on the day
before the wedding procession starts, the bridegroom goes round to all the
houses in the village and his sister dances round him with her head bent, and
all the people give him presents. This is known as the Binaiki or Farewell,
and the bride does the same in her village. Among the Jharia Telis the
women go and worship the marriage-post at the carpenter’s house while it is
being made. In this subcaste the bridegroom goes to the wedding in a cart
and not on horseback or in a litter as among some castes. The rule may
perhaps be a recognition of their humble station. The Halia subcaste can
dispense with the presence of a Brāhman at the wedding, but not the Jharias.
In Wardha the bridegroom’s head is covered with a blanket, over which is
placed the marriage-crown. On the arrival of the bridegroom’s party they are
regaled with sherbet or sugar and water by the bride’s relatives, and
sometimes red pepper is mixed with this by way of a joke. At a wedding of
the Gujarāti Tells in Nimār the caste-priest carries the tutelary goddess Kāli
in procession, and in front of her a pot filled with burning cotton-seeds and
oil. A cloth is held over the pot, and it is believed that the power of the

Page 680

goddess prevents the cloth from taking fire. If this should happen some great
calamity would be portended. Rāthor Teli girls, whether married or
unmarried, go with their heads bare, and a woman draws her cloth over her
head for the first time when she begins to live in her husband’s house.

6. Widow-remarriage

Divorce and widow-marriage are permitted. In Chhattīsgarh a widow is
always kept in the family if possible, and if her late husband’s brother be
only a boy she is sometimes induced to put on the bangles and wait for him.
If a barandi widow, that is one who has been married but has not lived with
her husband, desires to marry again out of his family, the second husband
must repay to them the amount spent on her first marriage. In Chānda, on the
other hand, some Telis do not permit a widow to marry her late husband’s
younger brother at all, and others only when he is a bachelor or a widower.
Here the minimum period for which a widow must remain single after her
husband’s death is one month. The engagement with a widow is arranged by
the suitor’s female relatives, and they pay her a rupee as earnest money. On
the day fixed she goes with one or two other widows to the bridegroom’s
house, and from there to the bazār, where she buys two pairs of bell-metal
rings, to be worn on the second toe of each foot, and some glass bangles. She
remains sitting in the bazār till well after dark, when some widow goes to
fetch her on behalf of her suitor. They bring her to his house, where the
couple sit together, and red powder is applied to their foreheads. They then
bathe and present their clothes to the washerman, putting on new clothes.
The idea in all this is clearly to sever the widow as completely as possible
from her old home and prevent her from being accompanied to the new one
by the first husband’s spirit. In some localities when a Teli widow remarries
it is considered most unlucky for any one to see the face of the bride or
bridegroom for twenty-four hours, or as some say for three days after the
wedding. The ceremony is therefore held at night, and for this period the
couple either remain shut up in the house or retire to the jungle.

Page 681

7. Religion: Caste deities

The caste especially revere Mahādeo or Siva, who gave them the oil-mill. In
the Nāgpur country they do not work the mill on Monday, because it is
Mahādeo’s day, he having the moon on his forehead. They revere the oil-
mill, and when the trunk is brought to be set up in the house, if there is
difficulty in moving it they make offerings to it of a goat or wheat-cakes or
cocoanuts, after which it moves easily. When a Teli first sets the trunk-socket
of the oil-press in the ground he buries beneath it five pieces of turmeric,
some cowries and an areca-nut In the northern Districts the Telis worship
Masān Bāba, who is supposed to be the ghost of a Teli boy. He is a boy
about three feet in height, black-coloured, with a long black scalp-lock.
Some Telis have Masān Bāba in their possession, and when they are turning
the oil-press they set him on top of it, and he makes the bullocks keep on
working, so that the master can go away and leave the press. But in order to
prevent him from getting into mischief a cake of flour mixed with human
hair must be placed in front of the press; he will eat this, but will first pick
out all the hairs one by one, and this will occupy him the whole night; but if
no cake is put for him he will eat all the food in the house. A Teli who has
not got Māsan must go to one who has and hire him for Rs. 1–4 a night.
They then both go to the owner’s oil-press, and the hirer says, ‘I have hired
you to-night,’ and the owner says, ‘Yes, I have let you for to-night’; and then
the hirer goes away, and Masān Bāba follows him and will turn the oil-mill
all night. A Teli who has not got Masān Bāba puts a stone on the oil-mill,
and then the bullock thinks that his master Masān is sitting on it, and will go
on turning the press; but this is not so good as having Masān Bāba. Some
say that he will repay his hirer the sum of Rs. 1–4 by stealing something
during the year and giving it to him. Masān may perhaps be considered as a
divine personification of the oil-press, and as being the Teli’s explanation of
the fact that the bullock goes on turning the press without being driven,
which he does not attribute simply to the animal’s docility. In Chhattīsgarh
Dūlha Deo is the household god of the caste, and he is said not to have any

Page 682

visible image or symbol, but is considered to reside in a cupboard in the
house. When any member of the family falls ill it is thought that Dūlha Deo
is angry, and a goat is offered to appease him. Like the other low castes the
Telis of the Nāgpur country make the sacrifice of a pig to Nārāyan Deo or
the Sun at intervals.

8. Driving out evil

Here on the third day after the Pola festival in the rains the women of the
caste bring the branches of a thorny creeper, with very small leaves, and call
it Mārbod, and sweep out the whole house with it, saying:

‘Ira, pīra, khātka, khatkīra,
Khānsi, kokhala, rai, rog,
Murkuto gheunja ga Mārbod,’

or, ‘Oh Mārbod! sweep away all diseases, pains, coughs, bugs, flies and
mosquitoes.’ And then they take the pot of sweepings and throw it outside
the village. Mārbod is the deity represented by the branch of the creeper.
This rite takes place in the middle of the rainy season, when all kinds of
insects infest the house, and colds and fever are prevalent Mr. H.R.
Crosthwaite sends the following explanation given by a Teli cultivator of an
eclipse of the sun: “The Sun is indebted to a sweeper. The sweeper has gone
to collect the debt and the Sun has refused to pay. The sweeper is in need of
the money and is sitting dharna at the Sun’s door; you can see his shadow
across the Sun’s threshold. Presently the debt will be paid and the sweeper
will go away.” The Telis of Nimār observe various Muhammadan practices.
They fast during the month of Ramazān, taking their food in the morning
before sunrise; and at Id they eat the vermicelli and dates which the
Muhammadans eat in memory of the time when their forefathers lived on
this food in the Arabian desert. Such customs are a relic of the long period of
Muhammadan dominance in Nimār, when the Hindus conformed partly to

Page 683

the religion of their masters. Many Telis are also members of the Swāmi-
Nārāyan reforming sect, which may have attracted them by its disregard of
the distinctions of caste and of the low status which attaches to them under
Hinduism.

9. Customs at birth and death

In Patna State a pregnant woman must not cross a river nor eat any fruit or
vegetables of red colour, nor wear any black cloth. These taboos preserve her
health and that of her unborn child. After the birth of a child a woman is
impure for seven or nine days in Chhattīsgarh, and is then permitted to cook.
The dead are either buried or burnt, cremation being an honour reserved for
the old. The body is placed in both cases with the head to the north and face
downwards or upwards for a male or female respectively.

10. Social status

The social status of the Telis is low, in the group of castes from which
Brāhmans will not take water, and below such menials as the blacksmith and
carpenter. Manu classes them with butchers and liquor-vendors: “From a
king not born in the military class let a Brāhman accept no gift nor from
such as keep a slaughter-house, or an oil-press, or put out a vintner’s flag or
subsist by the gains of prostitutes.” This is much about the position which
the Telis have occupied till recently. Brāhmans will not usually enter their
houses, though they have begun to do so in the case of the landholding
subcastes. It is noticeable that the Teli has a much better position in Bengal
than elsewhere. Sir H. Risley says: “Their original profession was probably
oil-pressing, and the caste may be regarded as a functional group recruited
from the respectable middle class of Hindu society. Oil is used by all Hindus

Page 684

for domestic and ceremonial purposes, and its manufacture could only be
carried on by men whose social purity was beyond dispute.” This is,
however, quite exceptional, and Mr. Crooke, Mr. Nesfield and Sir D.
Ibbetson are agreed as to his inferior, if not partly impure, status. This is only
one of several instances, such as those of the barber, the potter and the
weaver, of menial castes which in Bengal have now obtained a position
above the agricultural castes. It may be suggested in explanation that the old
fabric of Hindu society, that is the village community, has long decayed in
Bengal owing to Muhammadan dominance, the concentration of estates in
the hands of large proprietors and the weakening or lapse of the customary
rights of tenants. Coupled with this has been the growth of an important
urban population, in which the castes mentioned have raised themselves
from their menial position in the villages and attained wealth and influence,
just as the Gujarāti Telis are now doing in Burhānpur, while the agricultural
castes of Bengal have been comparatively depressed. Hence the urban
industrial castes have obtained a great rise in status. Sir H. Risley’s emphasis
of the importance of oil in Hindu domestic ceremonial is no doubt quite true,
though it is perhaps little used in sacrifices, butter being generally preferred
as a product of the sacred cow. But the inference does not seem necessarily
to follow that the producer of any article shares exactly in the estimation
attaching to the thing itself. Turmeric, for instance, is a sacred plant and
indispensable at every wedding; but those who grow turmeric always incur a
certain stigma and loss in social position. The reason for the impurity of the
Teli’s calling seems somewhat doubtful. That generally given is his sinful
conduct in harnessing the sacred ox and blindfolding the animal’s eyes to
make it work continuously on the tread-mill. The labour is said to be very
severe, and the bullocks often die after two or three years. As already seen,
the Teli fears that after death his soul may pass into one of his own bullocks
in retribution for his treatment of them during life. Another reason which
may be suggested is that the crushing of oil-seeds must involve a large
destruction of insect life, many of the seeds being at times infested with
insects. The Teli’s occupation would naturally rank with the other village
industries, that is below agriculture; and prior to the introduction of cash
coinage he must have received contributions of grain from the tenants for
supplying them with oil like the other village menials. He still takes his oil to
the fields at harvest-time and gets his sheaf of grain from each holding.

Page 685

11. Social customs and caste penalties

The Telis will take cooked food from Kurmis and Kunbis, and in some
localities from a Lohār or Barhai. Dhīmars are the highest caste which will
take food from them. In Mandla if a man does not attend the meeting of the
panchāyat when summoned for some special purpose, he is fined. In Chānda
a Teli beaten with a shoe by any other caste has to have his head shaved and
pay a rupee or two to the priest. In Mandla the Telis have made it a rule that
not less than four puris or wheat-cakes fried in butter6 must be given to each
guest at a caste-feast, besides rice and pulse. But if an offender is poor only
four or five men go to his feast, while if he is rich the whole caste go.

12. The Rāthor Telis

The Rāthor Telis of Mandla hold a number of villages. They now call
themselves Rāthor, and entirely disown the name of Teli. They say that they
came from the Maihar State near Panna, and that the title of Mahto, from
mahat, great, which is borne by the leading men of the caste, was conferred
on them by the Rāja of Maihar. Another story is that, as already related, they
are debased Rāthor Rājpūts. Recently they have given up eating fowls and
drinking liquor. They are good cultivators, borrowing among themselves at
low interest and avoiding debt, and their villages are generally prosperous.

13. Gujarāti Telis of Nimār

Page 686

Again, as has been seen, the Gujarāti Telis of Burhānpur have taken to trade,
and some of them have become wealthy merchants and capitalists from their
dealings in cotton. The position of Telis in Burhānpur was apparently one of
peculiar degradation under Muhammadan rule. According to local tradition
they had to remove the corpses of dead elephants, which no other caste
would consent to do, and also to dig the graves of Muhammadans. It is also
said that even now a Hindu becomes impure by passing under the eaves of a
Teli’s house, and that no dancing-girl may dance before a Teli, and if she
does so will incur a penalty of Rs. 50 to her caste. The Telis, on the other
hand, vigorously repudiate these allegations, which no doubt are due partly
to jealousy of their present prosperity and consequent attempts to better their
status. The Telis allege that they were Modh Banias in Gujarāt and when
they came to Burhānpur adopted the occupation of oil-pressing, which is
also countenanced by the Shāstras for a Vaishya. They say that formerly they
did not permit widow-marriage, but when living under Muhammadan rule
they were constrained to get their widows married in the caste, or the
Muhammadans would have taken them. The Muhammadan practices already
noticed as prevalent among them are being severely repressed, and they are
believed to have made a caste rule that any Teli who goes to the house of a
Muhammadan will have his hair and beard shaved and be fined Rs. 50. They
are also supposed to have made offers to Brāhmans of sums of Rs. 500 to
Rs. 1000 to come and take their food in the verandas of the Telis’ houses, but
hitherto these have not been accepted.

14. The Teli an unlucky caste

The Teli is considered a caste of bad omen. The proverb says, ‘God protect
me from a Teli, a Chamār and a Dhobi’; and the Teli is considered the most
unlucky of the three. He is also talkative: ‘Where there is a Teli there is sure
to be contention.’ The Teli is thought to be very close-fisted, but occasionally
his cunning overreaches itself: ‘The Teli counts every drop of oil as it issues
from the press, but sometimes he upsets the whole pot.’ The reason given for
his being unlucky is his practice of harnessing and blindfolding bullocks

Page 687

already mentioned, and also that he presses urad7 a black-coloured pulse, the
oil from which is offered to the unlucky planet Saturn on Saturdays. ‘Teli ka
bail,’ or ‘A Teli’s bullock,’ is a proverbial expression for a man who has to
slave very hard for small pay.8 The Teli is believed to have magical powers.
A good magician in search of an attendant spirit will, it is said, prefer to raise
the corpse of a Teli who died on a Tuesday. He proceeds to the burning-ghāt
with chickens, eggs, some vermilion and red cloth. He seats himself near to
where the corpse was burnt, and after repeating some spells offers up the
chickens and eggs and breaks the cocoanut. Then it is believed that the
corpse will gradually rise and take shape and be at the magician’s service so
long as the latter may desire. The following prescription is given for a love-
charm: take the skull of a Teli’s wife and cook some rice in it under a babūl9
tree on a Sunday. This if given to a girl to eat will make her fall in love with
him who gives it to her.

15. Occupation. Oil-pressing

The Teli’s oil-press is a very primitive affair. It consists of a hollowed tree-
trunk in which a post is placed with rounded lower end. The top of this
projects perhaps three feet above the hollow trunk and is secured by two
pieces of wood to a horizontal bar, one end of which presses against the
trunk, while the bullock is harnessed to the outer end. The yoke-bar hangs
about a foot from the ground, the inner end resting in a groove of the trunk,
while the outer is supported by the poles connecting it with the churning-
post. From the top of this latter a rope is also tied to the bullock’s horn to
keep the animal in position. The press is usually set up inside a shed, and it
is said that if the bullock were not blindfolded it would quickly become too
giddy to work. The bullock drags the yoke-bar round the trunk and this gives
a circular movement to the top of the churning-post, causing the lower end
of the latter to move as on a pivot inside the trunk. The friction thus
produced crushes the oil-seed, and the oil trickles out through a hole in the
lower part of the trunk. The oil of ramtilli or jagni is commonly burnt for
lighting in villages, and also that of the mahua-seed. Linseed-oil is generally

Page 688

exported, but if used at home it is mainly as an illuminant. It is mixed with
food by the Marātha castes but not in northern India. All the vegetable oils
are rapidly being supplanted by kerosene, even in villages; but the inferior
quality generally purchased, burnt as it is in small open saucers, gives out a
great deal of smoke and is said to be very injurious to the eyesight, and
students especially sustain permanent injury to the sight by working with
these lamps. This want is, however, being met, and cheap lamp-burners can
be bought in Bombay for about twelve annas. Owing to their having until
recently supplied the only means of illumination the Telis sometimes call
themselves Dīpabans, or ‘Sons of the lamp.’ Tilli or sesamum is called sweet
oil; it is much eaten by Brāhmans and others in the Marātha country, and is
always used for rubbing on the hair and body. On the festivals of Diwāli and
Til Sankrānt all Hindus rub sesamum oil on their bodies; otherwise they put
it on their hair once or twice a week, and on their bodies if they get a chill, or
as a protective against cold twice or thrice a month in the winter. The Uriya
castes rub oil on the body if they can afford it every day after bathing and
say that it keeps off malaria. Castor-oil is used as a medicine, and by some
people even as ordinary food. It is also a good lubricant, being applied to
cart-wheels and machinery. Other oils mentioned by Mr. Crooke are poppy-
seed, mustard, cocoanut and safflower, and those prepared from almond and
the berries of the nīm10 tree. The Teli’s occupation is a dirty one, his house
being filled with the refuse of oil and oil-seed, and Mr. Gordon notes that
leprosy is very prevalent in the caste.11

16. Trade and agriculture

The Telis are a very enterprising caste, and the great bulk of them have
abandoned their traditional occupation and taken to others which are more
profitable and respectable. In their trade, like that of the Kalār, cash payment
by barter must have been substituted for customary annual contributions at
an early period, and hence they learnt to keep accounts when their customers
were ignorant of this accomplishment. The knowledge has stood them in
good stead. Many of them have become moneylenders in a small way, and

Page 689

by this means have acquired villages. In the Raipur and Bilāspur Districts
they own more than 200 villages and 700 in the Central Provinces as a
whole. They are also shopkeepers and petty traders, travelling about with
pack-bullocks like the Banjāras. Mr. A. K. Smith notes that formerly the Teli
hired Banjāras to carry his goods through the jungle, as he would have been
killed by them if he had ventured to do so himself. But now he travels with
his own bullocks. Even in Mughal times Mr. Smith states Telis occasionally
rose to important positions; Kāwaji Teli was sutler to the Imperial army, and
obtained from the Emperor Jahāngīr a grant of Ashti in Wardha and an order
that no one should plant betel-vine gardens in Ashti without his permission.
This rule is still observed and any one wishing to have a betel-vine garden
makes a present to the patel. Krishna Kānta Nandi or Kānta Bābu, the
Banyan of Warren Hastings, was a Teli by caste and did much to raise their
position among the Hindus.12

17. Teli beneficence

Colonel Tod gives instances in Udaipur of works of beneficence executed by
Telis. “The Teli-ki-Sarai or oilman’s caravanserai is not conspicuous for
magnitude; but it is remarkable not merely for its utility but even for its
elegance of design. The Teli-ka-Pūl or Oilman’s Bridge at Nūrabād is a
magnificent memorial of the trade and deserves preservation. These Telis
perambulate the country with skins of oil on a bullock and from hard-earned
pence erect the structures which bear their name.”13 Similarly the temple of
Vishnu at Rājim is said to be named after one Rājan Telin, who discovered
the image lying abandoned by the roadside. She placed her skin of oil on it
to rest herself and on that day her oil never decreased, and when she had
finished selling in the market she had all her oil as well as the money. Her
husband suspected her of evil practices, but, when next day her mother-in-
law laid a skinful of oil on the image and the same thing happened, it was
seen that the god had made himself manifest to her, and a temple was built
and named after her and the image enshrined in it. Similarly the image of
Mahādeo at Pīthampur in Bilāspur was seen buried by a Teli in a dream, and

Page 690

he dug it up and made a shrine to it and was cured of dysentery. So an annual
fair is held and many people go there to be healed of their diseases.

1 This article is based on papers by Mr. Prem Nārāyan, Extra Assistant Commissioner, Chānda; Mr.
Mīr Pacha, Tahsīldār, Seoni; Mr. Chintāman Rao, Tahsīldār, Chanda; and Mr. K.G. Vaidya,
Chānda.

2 C.P. Census Report (1911), p. 147, referring to Professor Karl Pearson’s Chances of Death.
3 Tribes and Castes, art. Teli.

4 Bassia latifolia.
5 Hindus of Gujarāt, p. 72.

6 Weighing. 2 oz. each.
7 Phaseolus radiatas.

8 Mr. Crooke’s Tribes and Castes, art. Teli.
9 Acacia arabica.

10 Melia indica.
11 Indian Folk Tales, p. 10.

12 Tribes and Castes of Bengal, art. Teli.
13 Rājasthān, vol. ii. pp. 678, 679.

Page 691

Thug
[This article is based almost entirely on Colonel (Sir William) Sleeman’s
Rāmaseeāna or Vocabulary of the Thugs (1835). A small work, Hutton’s
Thugs and Dacoits, has been quoted for convenience, but it is compiled
entirely from Colonel Sleeman’s Reports. Another book by Colonel
Sleeman, Reports on the Depredations of the Thug Gangs, is mainly a series
of accounts of the journeys of different gangs and contains only a very brief
general notice.]

List of Paragraphs

1. Historical notice
2. Thuggees depicted in the caves of Ellora
3. Origin of the Thugs
4. Methods of assassination
5. Account of certain murders
6. Special incidents (continued)
7. Disguises of the Thugs
8. Secrecy of their operations
9. Support of landholders and villagers
10. Murder of sepoys
11. Callous nature of the Thugs
12. Belief in divine support
13. Theory of Thuggee as a religious sect
14. Worship of Kāli
15. The sacred pickaxe
16. The sacred gur (sugar)
17. Worship of ancestors
18. Fasting
19. Initiation of a novice
20. Prohibition of murder of women
21. Other classes of persons not killed

Page 692

22. Belief in omens
23. Omens and taboos
24. Nature of the belief in omens
25. Suppression of Thuggee

1. Historical notice

Thug, Phānsigar.—The famous community of murderers who were
accustomed to infest the high-roads and strangle travellers for their property.
The Thugs are, of course, now extinct, having been finally suppressed by
measures taken under the direction of Colonel Sleeman between 1825 and
1850. The only existing traces of them are a small number of persons known
as Goranda or Goyanda in Jubbulpore, the descendants of Thugs employed
in the school of industry which was established at that town. These work
honestly for their living and are believed to have no marked criminal
tendencies. In the course of his inquiries, however, Colonel Sleeman
collected a considerable mass of information about the Thugs, some of
which is of ethnological interest, and as the works in which this is contained
are out of print and not easily accessible, it seems desirable to record a
portion of it here. The word Thug signifies generically a cheat or robber,
while Phānsigar, which was the name used in southern India, is derived from
phānsi, a noose, and means a strangler. The form of robbery and murder
practised by these people was probably of considerable antiquity, and is
referred to as follows by a French traveller, Thevenot, in the sixteenth
century:

“Though the road I have been speaking of from Delhi to Agra be tolerable
yet it hath many inconveniences. One may meet with tigers, panthers and
lions upon it, and one can also best have a care of robbers, and above all
things not to suffer anybody to come near one upon the road. The cunningest
robbers in the world are in that country. They use a certain slip with a
running noose which they can cast with so much sleight about a man’s neck,

Page 693

when they are within reach of him, that they never fail, so that they can
strangle him in a trice. They have another cunning trick also to catch
travellers with. They send out a handsome woman upon the road, who with
her hair dishevelled seems to be all in tears, sighing and complaining of
some misfortune which she pretends has befallen her. Now, as she takes the
same way that the traveller goes he falls easily into conversation with her,
and finding her beautiful, offers her his assistance, which she accepts; but he
hath no sooner taken her up behind him on horseback, but she throws the
snare about his neck and strangles him, or at least stuns him until the robbers
who lie hid come running to her assistance and complete what she hath
begun. But besides that, there are men in those quarters so skilful in casting
the snare, that they succeed as well at a distance as near at hand; and if an ox
or any other beast belonging to a caravan run away, as sometimes it happens,
they fail not to catch it by the neck.”1

This passage seems to demonstrate an antiquity of three centuries for the
Thugs down to 1850. But during the period over which Sir William
Sleeman’s inquiries extended women never accompanied them on their
expeditions, and were frequently even, as a measure of precaution, left in
ignorance of the profession of their husbands.

2. Thuggees depicted in the caves of Ellora

The Thugs themselves believed that the operations of their trade were
depicted in the carvings of the Ellora caves, and a noted leader, Feringia, and
other Thugs spoke of these carvings as follows: “Every one of the operations
is to be seen there: in one place you see men strangling; in another burying
the bodies; in another carrying them off to the graves. Whenever we passed
near we used to go and see these caves. Every man will there find his trade
described and they were all made in one night.

“Everybody there can see the secret operations of his trade; but he does not
tell others of them; and no other person can understand what they mean.

Page 694

They are the works of God. No human hands were employed on them. That
everybody admits.”

Another Thug: “I have seen there the Sotha (inveigler) sitting upon the same
carpet as the traveller, and in close conversation with him, just as we are
when we worm out their secrets. In another place the strangler has got his
rūmāl (handkerchief) over his neck and is strangling him; while another, the
Chamochi, is holding him by the legs.” I do not think there is any reason to
suppose that these carvings really have anything to do with the Thugs.

3. Origin of the Thugs

The Thugs did not apparently ever constitute a distinct caste like the
Badhaks, but were recruited from different classes of the population. In
northern and southern India three-fourths or more, and in Central India about
a half, were Muhammadans, whether genuine or the descendants of
converted Hindus. The Muhammadan Thugs consisted of seven clans, Bhais,
Barsote, Kachuni, Hattar, Garru, Tandel and Rāthur: “And these, by the
common consent of all Thugs throughout India, whether Hindus or
Muhammadans, are admitted to be the most ancient and the great original
trunk upon which all the others have at different times and in different places
been grafted.”2 These names, however, are of Hindu and not of
Muhammadan origin; and it seems probable that many of the Thugs were
originally Banjāras or cattle-dealers and Kanjars or gipsies. One of the
Muhammadan Thugs told Colonel Sleeman that, “The Arcot gangs will
never intermarry with our families, saying that we once drove bullocks and
were itinerant tradesmen, and consequently of lower caste.”3 Another man
said4 that at their marriages an old matron would sometimes repeat as she
threw down the tulsi or basil, “Here’s to the spirits of those who once led
bears and monkeys; to those who drove bullocks and marked with the godini
(tattooing-needle); and those who made baskets for the head.” These are the
regular occupations of the Kanjars and Berias, the gipsy castes who are
probably derived from the Doms. And it seems not unlikely that these people

Page 695

may have been the true progenitors of the Thugs. There is at present a large
section of Muhammadan Kanjars who are recognised as members of the
caste by the Hindu section. Colonel Sleeman was of opinion that the Kanjars
also practised murder by strangling, but not as a regular profession; for this
would have been too dangerous, as they were accustomed to wander about
with their wives and all their belongings, and the disappearance of many
travellers in the locality of their camps would naturally excite suspicion.
Whereas the true Thugs resided in villages and towns and many of them had
other ostensible occupations, their periodical excursions for robbery and
murder being veiled under the pretence of some necessary journey. But the
Kanjars may have changed their mode of life on taking to this profession,
and their adroitness in other forms of crime, such as killing and carrying off
cattle, would make them likely persons to have discovered the advantages of
a system of murder of travellers by strangulation. The existing descendants
of the Thugs at Jubbulpore appear to be mainly Kanjars and Berias. For such
a life it is clear that the profession of the Muhammadan religion would be of
much assistance in maintaining the disguise; for it set a man free from many
caste obligations and ties and also from a host of irksome restrictions as to
eating and drinking with others. We may therefore conjecture, though
without certain knowledge, that many of the Thugs may originally have
become Muhammadans for convenience; and this is supported by the well-
known fact that the principal deity of all of them was the Hindu goddess
Kāli. Many bodies of Thugs were also recruited from other Hindu castes, of
whom the Lodhas or Lodhis were perhaps the most numerous; others of the
fraternity were Rājpūts, Brāhmans, Tāntis or weavers, Goālas or cowherds,
Multānis or Muhammadan Banjāras, as well as the Sānsias and Kanjars or
criminal vagrants and gipsies. These seem to have observed their caste rules
and to have intermarried among themselves; sometimes they obtained wives
from other families who had no connection with Thuggee and kept their
wives in ignorance of their nefarious trade; occasionally a girl would be
spared from a murdered party and married to a son of one of the Thugs;
while boys were more frequently saved and brought up to the business. The
Thugs said5 that the fidelity of their wives was proverbial and they were not
less loving and dutiful than those of other men, while several instances are
recorded of the strong affection borne by fathers to their children.

Page 696

4. Methods of assassination

As is well known the method of the Thugs was to attach themselves to
travellers, either single men or small parties, and at a convenient opportunity
to strangle them, bury the bodies and make off with the property found on
them. The gangs of Thugs usually contained from ten to fifty men and were
sometimes much larger; on one occasion as many as three hundred and sixty
Thugs accomplished the murder of a party of forty persons in Bilāspur.6
They pretended to be traders, soldiers or cultivators and usually went
without weapons in order to disarm suspicion; and this practice also
furnished them with an excuse for seeking for permission to accompany
parties travelling with arms. There was nothing to excite alarm or suspicion
in the appearance of these murderers; but on the contrary they are described
as being mild and benevolent of aspect, and peculiarly courteous, gentle and
obliging. In their palmy days the leader of the gang often travelled on
horseback with a tent and passed for a person of consequence or a wealthy
merchant. They were accustomed to get into conversation with travellers by
doing them some service or asking permission to unite their parties as a
measure of precaution. They would then journey on together, and strive to
win the confidence of their victims by a demeanour of warm friendship and
feigned interest in their affairs. Sometimes days would elapse before a
favourable opportunity occurred for the murder; an instance is mentioned of
a gang having accompanied a family of eleven persons for twenty days
during which they had traversed upwards of 200 miles and then murdered
the whole of them; and another gang accomplished 160 miles in twelve days
in company with a party of sixty men, women and children, before they
found a propitious occasion.7 Their favourite time for the murder was in the
evening when the whole party would be seated in the open, the Thugs
mingled with their victims, talking, smoking and singing. If their numbers
were sufficient three Thugs would be allotted to every victim, so that on the
signal being given two of them could lay hold of his hands and feet, while
the Bhurtot or strangler passed the rūmāl over his head and tightened it

Page 697

round his neck, forcing the victim backwards and not relaxing his hold till
life was extinct. The rūmāl or ‘handkerchief,’ always employed for throttling
victims, was really a loin-cloth or turban, in which a loop was made with a
slip-knot. The Thugs called it their sikka or ‘ensign,’ but it was not held
sacred like the pickaxe. When the leader of the gang cleared his throat
violently it was a sign to prepare for action, and he afterwards gave the jhirni
or signal for the murder, by saying either ‘Tamākhu khā lo,’ ‘Begin chewing
tobacco’; ‘Bhānja ko pān do,’ ‘Give betel to my nephew’; or ‘Ayi ho to ghiri
chalo,’ ‘If you are come, pray descend.’ Their adroitness was such that their
victims seldom or never escaped nor even had a chance of making a fight for
their lives. But if several persons were to be killed some men were detached
to surround the camp and cut down any one who tried to escape. The Thugs
do not therefore appear to have had any religious objection to the shedding
of blood, but they preferred murder by strangling as being safer. After the
murder the bodies were at once buried, being first cut about to prevent them
from swelling on decomposition, as this might raise the surface of the earth
over the grave and so attract attention. If the ground was too hard they were
thrown into a ravine or down one of the shallow irrigation wells which
abound in north India; and it was stated that the discovery of a body in one
of these wells was so common an occurrence that the cultivators took no
notice of it. If there were people in the vicinity so that it was dangerous to
dig the graves in the open air, the Thugs did not scruple to inter the bodies of
victims inside their own tents and to eat their food sitting on the soil above.
For the attack of a horseman three men were always detailed, if practicable,
so that one could seize the bridle and the other two pull him out of the saddle
and strangle him; but if, as happened occasionally, a single Thug managed to
kill a man on horseback, he obtained a great reputation, which even
descended to his children. On the other hand, if a strangler was unlucky or
clumsy, so that the cloth fell on the victim’s head or face, or he got blood on
his clothes or other suspicious signs, and these accidents recurred, he was
known as Bisul, and was excluded from the office of strangler on account of
presumed unfitness for the duty. When it was necessary for some reason to
murder a party on the march, some belhas or scouts were sent on ahead to
choose a beil or suitable place for the business, and see that no one was
coming in the opposite direction; and when the leader said, ‘Wash the cup,’ it
was a signal for the scouts to go forward for this purpose. If a traveller had a

Page 698

dog with him the dog was also killed, lest he might stay beside his master’s
grave and call attention to it. Another device in case of difficulty was for one
of the Thugs to feign sickness. The Garru or man who did this fell down on a
sudden and pretended to be taken violently ill. Some of his friends raised and
supported him, while others brought water and felt his pulse; and at last one
of them pretended that a charm would restore him. All were then requested
to sit down, the pot of water being in the centre; all were desired to take off
their belts, if they had any, and uncover their necks, and lastly to look up and
see if they could count a certain number of stars. While they were thus
occupied intently gazing at the sky to carry out the charm for the recovery of
the sick man, the cloths were passed round their necks and they were
strangled.

5. Account of certain murders

The secrecy and adroitness with which the Thugs conducted their murders
are well illustrated by the narrative of the assassination of a native official or
pleader at Lakhnādon in Seoni as given by one of the gang:8 “We fell in with
the Munshi and his family at Chhapāra between Nāgpur and Jubbulpore; and
they came on with us to Lakhnādon, where we found that some companies
of a native regiment under European officers were expected the next
morning. It was determined to put them all to death that evening as the
Munshi seemed likely to join the soldiers. The encampment was near the
village and the Munshi’s tent was pitched close to us. In the afternoon some
of the officers’ tents came on in advance and were pitched on the other side,
leaving us between them and the village. The khalāsis were all busily
occupied in pitching them. Nūr Khān and his son Sādi Khān and a few
others went as soon as it became dark to the Munshi’s tent, and began to play
and sing upon a sitār as they had been accustomed to do. During this time
some of them took up the Munshi’s sword on pretence of wishing to look at
it. His wife and children were inside listening to the music. The jhirni or
signal was given, but at this moment the Munshi saw his danger, called out
murder, and attempted to rush through, but was seized and strangled. His

Page 699

wife hearing him ran out with the infant in her arms, but was seized by
Ghabbu Khān, who strangled her and took the infant. The other daughter
was strangled in the tent. The saises (grooms) were at the time cleaning their
horses, and one of them seeing his danger ran under the belly of his horse
and called murder; but he was soon seized and strangled as well as all the
rest. In order to prevent the party pitching the officers’ tents from hearing the
disturbance, as soon as the signal was given those of the gang who were idle
began to play and sing as loud as they could; and two vicious horses were let
loose, and many ran after them calling out as loud as they could; so that the
calls of the Munshi and his party were drowned.” They thought at first of
keeping the infant, but decided that it was too risky, and threw it alive into
the grave in which the other bodies had been placed. It is surprising to
realise that in the above case about half a dozen people, awake and
conscious, were killed forcibly in broad daylight within a few paces of a
number of men occupied in pitching tents, without their noticing anything of
the matter; and this may certainly be characterised as an instance of murder
as a fine art to show the absolute callousness of the Thugs towards their
victims and the complete absence of any feelings of compassion, the story of
the following murder by the same gang may be recorded.9 The Thugs were
travelling from Nāgpur toward Jubbulpore with a party consisting of Newal
Singh, a Jemādār (petty officer) in the Nizām’s army, his brother, his two
daughters, one thirteen and the other eleven years old, his son about seven
years old, two young men who were to marry the daughters, and four
servants. At Dhūrna the house in which the Thugs lodged took fire, and the
greater number of them were seized by the police, but were released at the
urgent request of Newal Singh and his two daughters, who had taken a great
fancy to Khimoli, the principal leader of the gang, and some of the others.
Newal Singh was related to a native officer of the British detachment at
Seoni and obtained his assistance for the release of the Thugs. At this time
the gang had with them two bags of silk, the property of three carriers whom
they had murdered in the great temple of Kamptee, and if they had been
searched by the police these must have been discovered. On reaching
Jubbulpore the Thugs found a lodging in the town with Newal Singh and his
family. But the merchants who were expecting the silk from Nāgpur and
found that it had not arrived, induced the Kotwāl to search the lodging of the
Thugs. Hearing of the approach of the police, the leader Khimoli again

Page 700

availed himself of the attachment of Newal Singh and his daughters, and the
girls were made to sit each upon one of the two bags of silk while the police
searched the place. Nothing was found and the party again set out; and five
days afterwards Newal Singh and his whole family were murdered at Biseni
by the Thugs whom they had twice preserved from arrest.

6. Special incidents (continued)

These murderers looked on all travellers as their legitimate prey, as
sportsmen regard game. On one occasion the noted Thug, Feringia,10 with
his gang were cooking their dinners under some trees on the road when five
travellers came by, but could not be persuaded to stop and partake of the
meal, saying they wished to sleep at a place called Hirora that night, and had
yet eight miles to go. The Thugs afterwards followed, but found no traces of
the travellers at Hirora. Feringia therefore concluded that they must have
fallen into the hands of another gang, and suddenly recollected having
passed an encampment of Banjāras (pack-carriers) not far from the town. On
the following morning he accordingly went back with a few of his comrades,
and at once recognised a horse and pony which he had observed in the
possession of the travellers. So he asked the Banjāras, “What have you done
with the five travellers, my good friends? You have taken from us our banij
(merchandise).” They apologised for what they had done, pleading
ignorance of the lien of the other Thugs, and offered to share the booty; but
Feringia declined, as none of his party had been present at the loading. They
were accustomed to distinguish their most important exploits by the number
of persons who were killed. Thus one murder in the Jubbulpore District was
known as the ‘Sāthrup,’ or ‘Sixty soul affair,’ and another in Bilāspur as the
‘Chālisrup,’ or ‘Murder of forty.’ At this time (1807) the road between
northern and southern India through the Nerbudda valley had been rendered
so unsafe by the incursions of the Pindāris that travellers preferred to go
through Chhattīsgarh and Sambalpur to the Ganges. This route, passing for
long distances through dense forest, offered great advantages to the Thugs,
and was soon infested by them. In 1806, owing to the success11 of previous

Page 701

expeditions, it was determined that all the Thugs of northern India should
work on this road; accordingly after the Dasahra festival six hundred of
them, under forty Jemādārs or leaders of note, set out from their homes, and
having worshipped in the temple of Devi at Bindhyāchal, met at Ratanpur in
Bilāspur. The gangs split up, and after several murders sixty of them came to
Lānji in Bālāghāt, and here in two days’ time fell in with a party of thirty-
one men, seven women and two girls on their way to the Ganges. The
Jemādārs soon became intimate with the principal men of the party,
pretended to be going to the same part of India and won their confidence;
and next day they all set out and in four days reached Ratanpur, where they
met 160 Thugs returning from the murder of a wealthy widow and her
escort. Shortly afterwards another 200 men who had heard of the travellers
near Nāgpur also came up, but all the different bodies pretended to be
strangers to each other. They detached sixty men to return to Nāgpur, leaving
360 to deal with the forty travellers. From Ratanpur they all journeyed to
Chura (Chhuri?), and here scouts were sent on to select a proper place for
the murder. This was chosen in a long stretch of forest, and two men were
despatched to the village of Sutranja, farther on the road, to see that no one
was coming in the opposite direction, while another picket remained behind
to prevent interruption from the rear. By the time they reached the appointed
place, the Bhurtots (stranglers) and Shamsias (holders) had all on some
pretext or other got close to the side of the persons whom they were
appointed to kill; and on reaching the spot the signal was given in several
places at the same time; and thirty-eight out of forty were immediately
seized and strangled. One of the girls was a very handsome young woman,
and Pancham, a Jemādār, wished to preserve her as a wife for his son. But
when she saw her father and mother strangled she screamed and beat her
head against the ground and tried to kill herself. Pancham tried in vain to
quiet her, and promised to take great care of her and marry her to his own
son, who would be a great chief; but all to no effect. She continued to
scream, and at last Pancham put the rūmāl (handkerchief) round her neck
and strangled her. One little girl of three years old was preserved by another
Jemādār and married to his son, and when she grew up often heard the story
of the affair narrated. The bodies were buried in a ravine and the booty
amounted to Rs. 17,000. The Thugs then decided to return home, and arrived
without mishap, except that the Jemādār, Pancham, died on the way.

Page 702

7. Disguises of the Thugs

They were not particular, however, to ascertain that their victims carried
valuable property before disposing of them. Eight annas (8d.), one of them
said,12 was sufficient remuneration for murdering a man. On another
occasion two river Thugs killed two old men and obtained only a rupee’s
worth of coppers, two brass vessels and their body-cloths. But as a rule the
gains were much larger. It sometimes happened that the Thugs themselves
were robbed at night by ordinary thieves, though they usually set a watch.
On one occasion a band of more than a hundred Thugs fell in with a party of
twenty-seven dacoits who had with them stolen property of Rs. 13,000 in
cash, with gold ornaments, gems and shawls. The Thugs asked to be allowed
to travel under their protection, and the dacoits carelessly assenting were
shortly afterwards all murdered.13 As already stated, the Thugs were
accustomed to live in towns or villages and many of them ostensibly
followed respectable callings. The following instance of this is given by Sir
W. Sleeman:14 “The first party of Thug approvers whom I sent into the
Deccan to aid Captain Reynolds recognised in the person of one of the most
respectable linen-drapers of the cantonment of Hingoli, Hari Singh, the
adopted son of Jawāhir Sukul, Sūbahdār of Thugs, who had been executed
twenty years before. On hearing that the Hari Singh of the list sent to him of
noted Thugs at large in the Deccan was the Hari Singh of the Sadar Bazār,
Captain Reynolds was quite astounded; so correct had he been in his
deportment and all his dealings that he had won the esteem of all the
gentlemen of the station, who used to assist him in procuring passports for
his goods on their way from Bombay; and yet he had, as he has since himself
shown, been carrying on his trade of murder up to the very day of his arrest
with gangs of Hindustān and the Deccan on all the roads around and close to
the cantonments of Hingoli; and leading out his band of assassins while he
pretended to be on his way to Bombay for a supply of fresh linen and broad-
cloth.” Another case is quoted by Mr. Oman from Taylor’s Thirty-eight Years
in India.15 “Dr. Cheek had a child’s bearer who had charge of his children.

Page 703

The man was a special favourite, remarkable for his kind and tender ways
with his little charges, gentle in manner and unexceptionable in all his
conduct. Every year he obtained leave from his master and mistress, as he
said, for the filial purpose of visiting his aged mother for one month; and
returning after the expiry of that time, with the utmost punctuality, resumed
with the accustomed affection and tenderness the charge of his little darlings.
This mild and exemplary being was the missing Thug; kind, gentle,
conscientious and regular at his post for eleven months in the year he
devoted the twelfth to strangulation.”

8. Secrecy of their operations

Again, as regards the secrecy with which murders were perpetrated and all
traces of them hidden, Sir W. Sleeman writes:16 “While I was in civil charge
of the District of Narsinghpur, in the valley of the Nerbudda, in the years
1822–1824, no ordinary robbery or theft could be committed without my
becoming aware of it, nor was there a robber or thief of the ordinary kind in
the District with whose character I had not become acquainted in the
discharge of my duties as magistrate; and if any man had then told me that a
gang of assassins by profession resided in the village of Kandeli,17 not four
hundred yards from my court, and that the extensive groves of the village of
Mundesur, only one stage from me on the road to Saugor and Bhopāl, were
one of the greatest beles or places of murder in all India, and that large gangs
from Hindustān and the Deccan used to rendezvous in these groves, remain
in them for many days every year, and carry on their dreadful trade along all
the lines of road that pass by and branch off from them, with the knowledge
and connivance of the two landholders by whose ancestors these groves had
been planted, I should have thought him a fool or a madman; and yet nothing
could have been more true. The bodies of a hundred travellers lie buried in
and around the groves of Mundesur; and a gang of assassins lived in and
about the village of Kandeli while I was magistrate of the District, and
extended their depredations to the cities of Poona and Hyderābād.”

Page 704

9. Support of landholders and villagers

The system of Thuggee reached its zenith during the anarchic period of the
decline of the Mughal Empire, when only the strongest and most influential
could obtain any assistance from the State in recovering property or exacting
reparation for the deaths of murdered friends and relatives. Nevertheless, the
Thugs could hardly have escaped considerable loss even from private
vengeance had they been compelled to rely on themselves for protection. But
this was not the case, for, like the Badhaks and other robbers, they enjoyed
the countenance and support of landholders and ruling chiefs in return for
presenting them with the choicest of their booty and taking holdings of land
at very high rents. Sir W. Sleeman wrote18 that, “The zamīndārs and
landholders of every description have everywhere been found ready to
receive these people under their protection from the desire to share in the
fruits of their expeditions, and without the slightest feeling of religious or
moral responsibility for the murders which they know must be perpetrated to
secure these fruits. All that they require from them is a promise that they will
not commit murders within their estates and thereby involve them in
trouble.” Sometimes the police could also be conciliated by bribes, and on
one occasion when a body of Thugs who had killed twenty-five persons
were being pursued by the Thākur of Powai19 they retired upon the village of
Tigura, and even the villagers came out to their support and defended them
against his attack. Another officer wrote:20 “To conclude, there seems no
doubt but that this horrid crime has been fostered by all classes in the
community—the landholders, the native officers of our courts, the police and
village authorities—all, I think, have been more or less guilty; my meaning
is not, of course, that every member of these classes, but that individuals
varying in number in each class were concerned. The subordinate police
officials have in many cases been practising Thugs, and the chaukīdārs or
village watchmen frequently so.”

Page 705

10. Murder of sepoys

A favourite class of victims were sepoys proceeding to their homes on
furlough and carrying their small savings; such men would not be quickly
missed, as their relatives would think they had not started, and the
regimental authorities would ascribe their failure to return to desertion. So
many of these disappeared that a special Army Order was issued warning
them not to travel alone, and arranging for the transmission of their money
through the Government treasuries.21 In this order it is stated that the Thugs
were accustomed first to stupefy their victim by surreptitiously
administering the common narcotic dhatūra, still a familiar method of
highway robbery.

11. Callous nature of the Thugs

Like the Badhaks and other Indian robbers and the Italian banditti the Thugs
were of a very religious or superstitious turn of mind. There was not one
among them, Colonel Sleeman wrote,22 who doubted the divine origin of
Thuggee: “Not one who doubts that he and all who have followed the trade
of murder, with the prescribed rites and observance, were acting under the
immediate orders and auspices of the goddess, Devi, Durga, Kāli or
Bhawāni, as she is indifferently called, and consequently there is not one
who feels the slightest remorse for the murders which he may have
perpetrated or abetted in the course of his vocation. A Thug considers the
persons murdered precisely in the light of victims offered up to the goddess;
and he remembers them as a priest of Jupiter remembered the oxen and a
priest of Saturn the children sacrificed upon their altars. He meditates his
murders without any misgivings, he perpetrates them without any emotions

Page 706

of pity, and he recalls them without any feeling of remorse. They trouble not
his dreams, nor does their recollection ever cause him inquietude in
darkness, in solitude or in the hour of death.”

And again: “The most extraordinary trait in the characters of these people is
not this that they can look back upon all the murders they have perpetrated
without any feelings of remorse, but that they can look forward indifferently
to their children, whom they love as tenderly as any man in the world,
following the same trade of murder or being united in marriage to men who
follow the trade. When I have asked them how they could cherish these
children through infancy and childhood under the determination to make
them murderers or marry them to murderers, the only observation they have
ever made was that formerly there was no danger of their ever being hung or
transported, but that now they would rather that their children should learn
some less dangerous trade.”

12. Belief in divine support

They considered that all their victims were killed by the agency of God and
that they were merely irresponsible agents, appointed to live by killing
travellers as tigers by feeding on deer. If a man committed a real murder they
held that his family must become extinct, and adduced the fact that this fate
had not befallen them as proof that their acts of killing were justifiable. Nay,
they even held that those who oppressed them were punished by the
goddess:23 “Was not Nanha, the Rāja of Jālon,” said one of them, “made
leprous by Devi for putting to death Budhu and his brother Khumoli, two of
the most noted Thugs of their day? He had them trampled under the feet of
elephants, but the leprosy broke out on his body the very next day. When
Mūdhaji Sindhia caused seventy Thugs to be executed at Mathura was he not
warned in a dream by Devi that he should release them? And did he not the
very day after their execution begin to spit blood? And did he not die within
three months?” Their subsequent misfortunes and the success of the British
officers against them they attributed to their disobedience of the ordinances

Page 707

of Devi in slaying women and other classes of prohibited persons and their
disregard of her omens. They also held that the spirits of all their victims
went straight to Paradise, and this was the reason why the Thugs were not
troubled by them as other murderers were.

13. Theory of Thuggee as a religious sect

The fact that the Thugs considered themselves to be directed by the deity,
reinforced by their numerous superstitious beliefs and observances, has led
to the suggestion by one writer that they were originally a religious sect,
whose principal tenet was the prohibition of the shedding of blood. There is,
however, no evidence in support of this view in the accounts of Colonel
Sleeman, incomparably the best authority. Their method of strangulation
was, as has been seen, simply the safest and most convenient means of
murder: it enabled them to dispense with arms, by the sight of which the
apprehensions of their victims would have been aroused, and left no traces
on the site of the crime to be observed by other travellers. On occasion also
they did not scruple to employ weapons; as in the murder of seven treasure-
bearers near Hindoria in Damoh, who would not probably have allowed the
Thugs to approach them, and in consequence were openly attacked and
killed with swords.24 Other instances are given in Colonel Sleeman’s
narrative, and they were also accustomed to cut and slash about the bodies of
their victims after death. The belief that they were guided by the divine will
may probably have arisen as a means of excusing their own misdeeds to
themselves and allaying their fear of such retribution as being haunted by the
ghosts of their victims. Similar instances of religious beliefs and practices
are given in the accounts of other criminals, such as the Badhaks and
Sānsias. And the more strict and serious observances of the Thugs may be
accounted for by the more atrocious character of their crimes and the more
urgent necessity of finding some palliative.

Page 708

The Goddess Kāli

The veneration paid to the pickaxe, which will shortly be described, merely
arises from the common animistic belief that tools and implements generally
achieve the results obtained from them by their inherent virtue and of their
own volition, and not from the human hand which guides them and the
human brain which fashioned them to serve their ends. Members of
practically all castes worship the implements of their profession and thus
afford evidence of the same belief, the most familiar instance of which is

Page 709

perhaps, ‘The pestilence that walketh in the darkness and the arrow that
flieth by noonday’; where the writer intended no metaphor but actually
thought that the pestilence walked and the arrow flew of their own volition.

14. Worship of Kāli

Kāli or Bhawāni was the principal deity of the Thugs, as of most of the
criminal and lower castes; and those who were Muhammadans got over the
difficulty of her being a Hindu goddess by pretending that Fātima, the
daughter of the Prophet, was an incarnation of her. In former times they held
that the goddess was accustomed to relieve them of the trouble of destroying
the dead bodies by devouring them herself; but in order that they might not
see her doing this she had strictly enjoined on them never to look back on
leaving the site of a murder. On one occasion a novice of the fraternity
disobeyed this rule and, unguardedly looking behind him, saw the goddess in
the act of feasting upon a body with the half of it hanging out of her mouth.
Upon this she declared that she would no longer devour those whom the
Thugs slaughtered; but she agreed to present them with one of her teeth for a
pickaxe, a rib for a knife and the hem of her lower garment for a noose, and
ordered them for the future to cut about and bury the bodies of those whom
they destroyed. As there seems reason to suppose that the goddess Kāli
represents the deified tiger, on which she rides, she was eminently
appropriate as the patroness of the Thugs and in the capacity of the devourer
of corpses.

15. The sacred pickaxe

When the sacred pickaxe used for burying corpses had to be made, the leader
of the gang, having ascertained a lucky day from the priest, went to a

Page 710

blacksmith and after closing the door so that no other person might enter, got
him to make the axe in his presence without touching any other work until it
was completed. A day was then chosen for the consecration of the pickaxe,
either Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday or Friday; and the ceremony was
performed inside a house or tent, so that the shadow of no living thing might
fall on and contaminate the sacred implement. A pit was dug in the ground
and over it the pickaxe was washed successively with water, sugar and
water, sour milk, and alcoholic liquor, all of which were poured over it into
the pit. Finally it was marked seven times with vermilion. A burnt offering
was then made with all the usual ingredients for sacrifice and the pickaxe
was passed seven times through the flames. A cocoanut was placed on the
ground, and the priest, holding the pickaxe by the point in his right hand,
said, ‘Shall I strike?’ The others replied yes, and striking the cocoanut with
the butt end he broke it in pieces, upon which all exclaimed, ‘All hail, Devi,
and prosper the Thugs.’ All then partook of the kernel of the cocoanut, and
collecting the fragments put them into the pit so that they might not
afterwards be contaminated by the touch of any man’s foot. Here the
cocoanut may probably be considered as a substituted sacrifice for a human
being. Thereafter the pickaxe was called Kassi or Mahi instead of kudāli the
ordinary name, and was given to the shrewdest, cleanest and most sober and
careful man of the party, who carried it in his waist-belt. While in camp he
buried it in a secure place with its point in the direction they intended to go;
and they believed that if another direction was better the point would be
found changed towards it. They said that formerly the pickaxe was thrown
into a well and would come up of itself when summoned with due
ceremonies; but since they disregarded the ordinances of Kāli it had lost that
virtue. Many Thugs told Colonel Sleeman25 that they had seen the pickaxe
rise out of the well in the morning of its own accord and come to the hands
of the man who carried it; and even the several pickaxes of different gangs
had been known to come up of themselves from the same well and go to
their respective bearers. The pickaxe was also worshipped on every seventh
day during an expedition, and it was believed that the sound made by it in
digging a grave was never heard by any one but a Thug. The oath by the
pickaxe was in their esteem far more sacred than that by the Ganges water or
the Korān, and they believed that a man who perjured himself by this oath
would die or suffer some great calamity within six days. In prison, when

Page 711

administering an oath to each other in cases of dispute, they sometimes made
an image of the pickaxe out of a piece of cloth and consecrated it for the
purpose. If the pickaxe at any time fell from the hands of the carrier it was a
dreadful omen and portended either that he would be killed that year or that
the gang would suffer some grievous misfortune. He was deprived of his
office and the gang either returned home or chose a fresh route and
consecrated the pickaxe anew.

16. The sacred gur (sugar)

After each murder they had a sacrificial feast of gur or unrefined sugar. This
was purchased to the value of Rs. 1–4, and the leader of the gang and the
other Bhurtotes (stranglers) sat on a blanket with the rest of the gang round
them. A little sugar was dropped into a hole and the leader prayed to Devi to
send them some rich victims. The remainder of the sugar was divided among
all present. One of them gave the jhirni or signal for strangling and they
consumed the sugar in solemn silence, no fragment of it being lost They
believed that it was this consecrated gur which gave the desire for the trade
of a Thug and made them callous to the sufferings of their victims, and they
thought that if any outsider tasted it he would at once become a Thug and
continue so all his life. When Colonel Sleeman asked26 a young man who
had strangled a beautiful young woman in opposition to their rules, whether
he felt no pity for her, the leader Feringia exclaimed: “We all feel pity
sometimes, but the gur of the Tuponi (sacrifice) changes our nature. It would
change the nature of a horse. Let any man once taste of that gur and he will
be a Thug, though he knows all the trades and have all the wealth in the
world. I never wanted food; my mother’s family was opulent, her relations
high in office. I have been high in office myself, and became so great a
favourite wherever I went that I was sure of promotion; yet I was always
miserable while absent from my gang and obliged to return to Thuggee. My
father made me taste of that fatal gur when I was yet a mere boy; and if I
were to live a thousand years I should never be able to follow any other
trade.”

Page 712

The eating of this gur was clearly the sacrificial meal of the Thugs. On the
analogy of other races they should have partaken of the body of an animal
god at their sacrificial meal, and if the goddess Kāli is the deified tiger, they
should have eaten tiger’s flesh. This custom, if it ever existed, had been
abandoned, and the gur would in that case be a substitute; and as has been
seen the eating of the gur was held to confer on them the same cruelty,
callousness and desire to kill which might be expected to follow from eating
tiger’s flesh and thus assimilating the qualities of the animal. Since they
went unarmed as a rule, in order to avoid exciting the suspicions of their
victims, it would be quite impossible for them to obtain tiger’s flesh, except
by the rarest accident; and the gur might be considered a suitable substitute,
since its yellow colour would be held to make it resemble the tiger.

17. Worship of ancestors

The Thugs also worshipped the spirits of their ancestors. One of these was
Dādu Dhira, an ancient Thug of the Barsote class, who was invoked at
certain religious ceremonies, when liquor was drunk. Vows were made to
offer libations of ardent spirits to him, and if the prayer was answered the
worshipper drank the liquor, or if his caste precluded him from doing this,
threw it on the ground with an expression of thanks. Another deity was the
spirit of Jhora Nāik, who was a Muhammadan. He and his servant killed a
man who had jewels and other articles laden on a mule to the value of more
than a lakh and a half. They brought home the booty, assembled all the
members of their fraternity within reach, and honestly divided the whole as
if all had been present The Thugs also said that Nizām-ud-dīn Aulia, a well-
known Muhammadan saint, famed for his generosity, whose shrine is near
Delhi, had been a Thug, at any rate in his younger days. He distributed so
much money in charity that he was supposed to be endowed with a Dustul
Ghīb or supernatural purse; and they supposed that he obtained it by the
practice of Thuggee. Orthodox Muhammadans would, however, no doubt
indignantly repudiate this.

Page 713

18. Fasting

Whenever they set out on a fresh expedition the first week was known as
Satha (seven). During this period the families of those who were engaged in
it would admit no visitors from the relatives of other Thugs, lest the
travellers destined for their own gang should go over to these others; neither
could they eat any food belonging to the families of other Thugs. During the
Satha period the Thugs engaged in the expedition ate no animal food except
fish and nothing cooked with ghī (melted butter). They did not shave or
bathe or have their clothes washed or indulge in sexual intercourse, or give
away anything in charity or throw any part of their food to dogs or jackals.
At one time they ate no salt or turmeric, but this rule was afterwards
abandoned. But if the Sourka or first murder took place within the seven
days they considered themselves relieved by it from all these restraints.

19. Initiation of a novice

A Thug seldom attained to the office of Bhurtote or strangler until he had
been on several expeditions and acquired the requisite courage or
insensibility by slow degrees. At first they were almost always shocked or
frightened; but after a time they said they lost all sympathy with the victims.
They were first employed as scouts, then as buriers of the dead, next as
Shamsias or holders of hands, and finally as stranglers. When a man felt that
he had sufficient courage and insensibility he begged the oldest and most
renowned Thug of the gang to make him his chela or disciple. If his proposal
was accepted he awaited the arrival of a suitable victim of not too great
bodily strength. While the traveller was asleep with the gang at their quarters
the guru or preceptor took his disciple into a neighbouring field, followed by

Page 714

three or four old members of the gang. Here they all faced in the direction in
which the gang intended to move, and the guru said, “Oh Kāli, Kunkāli,
Bhudkāli,27 Oh Kāli, Mahā Kāli, Kalkatāwāli! If it seemeth to thee fit that
the traveller now at our lodging should die by the hands of this thy slave,
vouchsafe, we pray thee, the omen on the right.” If they got this within a
certain interval the candidate was considered to be accepted, and if not some
other Thug put the traveller to death and he had to wait for another chance.
In the former case they returned to their quarters and the guru took a
handkerchief and tied the slip-knot in one end of it with a rupee inside it.
The disciple received it respectfully in his right hand and stood over the
victim with the Shamsia or holder by his side. The traveller was roused on
some pretence or other and the disciple passed the handkerchief over his
neck and strangled him. He then bowed down to his guru and all his
relations and friends in gratitude for the honour he had obtained. He gave the
rupee from the knot with other money, if he had it, to the guru, and with this
sugar or sweetmeats were bought and the gur sacrifice was celebrated, the
new strangler taking one of the seats of honour on the blanket for the first
time. The relation between a strangler and his guru was considered most
sacred, and a Thug would often rather betray his father than the preceptor by
whom he had been initiated. There were certain classes of persons whom
they were forbidden to kill, and they considered that the rapid success of the
English officers in finally breaking up the gangs was to be attributed to the
divine wrath at breaches of these rules. The original rule28 was that the
Sourka or first victim must not be a Brāhman, nor a Saiyad, nor any very
poor man, nor any man with gold on his person, nor any man who had a
quadruped with him, nor a washerwoman, nor a sweeper, nor a Teli (oilman),
nor a Bhāt (bard), nor a Kāyasth (writer), nor a leper, dancing-woman,
pilgrim or devotee. The reason for some of these exemptions is obvious:
Brāhmans, Muhammadan Saiyads, bards, religious mendicants and devotees
were excluded owing to their sanctity; and sweepers, washermen and lepers
owing to their impurity, which would have the same evil and unlucky effect
on their murderers as the holiness of the first classes. A man wearing gold
ornaments would be protected by the sacred character of the metal; and the
killing of a poor man as the first victim would naturally presage a lack of
valuable booty during the remainder of the expedition. Telis and Kāyasths

Page 715

are often considered as unlucky castes, and even in the capacity of victims
might be held to bring an evil fortune on their murderers.

20. Prohibition of murder of women

Another list is given of persons whom it was forbidden to kill at any time,
and of these the principal category was women. It was a rule of all Thugs
that women should not be murdered, but one which they constantly broke,
for few large parties consisted solely of men, and to allow victims to escape
from a party would have been a suicidal policy. In all the important exploits
related to Colonel Sleeman the women who accompanied victims were
regularly strangled, with the occasional exception of young girls who might
be saved and married to the sons of Thug leaders. The breach of the rule as
to the murder of women was, however, that which they believed to be
specially offensive to their patroness Bhawāni; and no Thug, Colonel
Sleeman states, was ever known to offer insult either in act or speech to the
women whom they were about to murder. No gang would ever dare to
murder a woman with whom one of its members should be suspected of
having had criminal intercourse. The murder of women was especially
reprobated by Hindus, and the Muhammadan Thugs were apparently
responsible for the disregard of this rule which ultimately became prevalent,
as shown by the dispute over the killing of a wealthy old lady,29 narrated by
one of the Thugs as follows: “I remember the murder of Kāli Bībi well; I
was at the time on an expedition to Baroda and not present, but Punua must
have been there. A dispute arose between the Musalmāns and Hindus before
and after the murder. The Musalmāns insisted upon killing her as she had Rs.
4000 of property with her, but the Hindus would not agree. She was killed,
and the Hindus refused to take any part of the booty; they came to blows, but
at last the Hindus gave in and consented to share in all but the clothes and
ornaments which the woman wore. Feringia’s father, Parasrām Brāhman,
was there, and when they came home Parasrām’s brother, Rai Singh, refused
to eat, drink or smoke with his brother till he had purged himself from this
great sin; and he, with two other Thugs, a Rājpūt and a Brāhman, gave a

Page 716

feast which cost them a thousand rupees each. Four or five thousand
Brāhmans were assembled at that feast. Had it rested here we should have
thrived; but in the affair of the sixty victims women were again murdered; in
the affair of the forty several women were murdered; and from that time we
may trace our decline.”

21. Other classes of persons not killed

Another rule was that a man having a cow with him should not be murdered,
no doubt on account of the sanctity attaching to the animal. But in one case
of a murder of fourteen persons including women and a man with a cow at
Kotri in the Damoh District, the Thugs, having made acquaintance with the
party, pretended that they had made a vow to offer a cow at a temple in
Shāhpur lying on their road and persuaded the cow’s owner to sell her to
them for this sacred purpose, and having duly made the offering and
deprived him of the protection afforded by the cow, they had no
compunction in strangling him with all the travellers. Travellers who had lost
a limb were also exempted from death, but this rule too was broken, as in the
case of the native officer with his two daughters who was murdered by the
Thugs he had befriended; for it is recorded that this man had lost a leg.
Pilgrims carrying Ganges water could not be killed if they actually had the
Ganges water with them; and others who should not be murdered were
washermen, sweepers, oil-vendors, dancers and musicians, carpenters and
blacksmiths, if found travelling together, and religious mendicants. The
reason for the exemption of carpenters and blacksmiths only when travelling
together may probably have been that the sacred pickaxe was their joint
handiwork, having a wooden handle and an iron head; and this seems a more
likely explanation than any other in view of the deep veneration shown for
the pickaxe. Maimed persons would probably not be acceptable victims to
the goddess, according to the rule that the sacrifice must be without spot or
blemish. The other classes have already been discussed under the exemption
of first victims. Among the Deccan Thugs if a man strangled any victim of a

Page 717

class whom it was forbidden to kill, he was expelled from the community
and never readmitted to it. This was considered a most dreadful crime.

22. Belief in omens

The Thugs believed that the wishes of the deity were constantly indicated to
them by the appearance or cries of a large number of wild animals and birds
from which they drew their omens; and indeed the number of these was so
extensive that they could never be at a loss for an indication of the divine
will, and difficulties could only arise when the omens were conflicting. As a
general rule the omen varied according as it was heard on the left hand,
known as Pilhao, or the right, known as Thibao. On first opening an
expedition an omen must be heard on the left and be followed by one on the
right, or no start was made; it signified that the deity took them first by the
left hand and then by the right to lead them on. When they were preparing to
march or starting on a road, an omen heard on the left encouraged them to go
on, but if it came from the right they halted. When arriving at their camping-
place on the other hand the omen on the right was auspicious and they
stayed, but if it came from the left the projected site was abandoned and the
march continued. In the case of the calls of a very few animals these rules
were reversed, left and right being transposed in each instance. The howl of
the jackal was always bad if heard during the day, and the gang immediately
quitted the locality, leaving untouched any victims whom they might have
inveigled, however wealthy. The jackal’s cry at night followed the rule of
right and left. The jackal was probably revered by the Thugs as the devourer
of corpses. The sound made by the lizard was at all times and places a very
good omen; but if a lizard fell upon a Thug it was bad, and any garment
touched by it must be given away in charity. The call of the sāras crane was
a very important omen, and when heard first on the left and then on the right
or vice versa according to the rules given above, they expected a great booty
in jewels or money. The call of the partridge followed the same rules but was
not of so much importance. That of the large crow was favourable if the bird
was sitting on a tree, especially when a tank or river could be seen; but if the

Page 718

crow was perched on the back of a buffalo or pig or on the skeleton of any
animal, it was a bad omen. Tanks or rivers were likely places for booty in the
shape of resting travellers, whose death the appearance of the crow might
portend; whereas in the other positions it might prognosticate a Thug’s own
death. The chirping of the small owlet was considered to be a bad omen,
whether made while the bird was sitting or flying; It was known as chiraiya
and is a low and melancholy sound seldom repeated. They considered it a
very bad omen to hear the hare squeaking; this, unless it was averted by
sacrifices, signified, they said, that they would perish in the jungles, and the
hare or some other animal of the forest would drink water from their skulls.
“We know that the hare was used in Brittany as an animal of augury for
foretelling the future; and all animals of augury were once venerated.”30 The
hare has still some remnant of sanctity among the Hindus. Women will not
eat its flesh, and men eat the flesh of wild hares only, not of tame ones. It
seems likely that the hare may have been considered capable of foretelling
the future on account of its long ears. The omen of the donkey was
considered the most important of all, whether it threatened evil or promised
good. It was a maxim of augury that the ass was equal to a hundred birds,
and it was also more important than all other quadrupeds. If they heard its
bray on the left on the opening of an expedition and it was soon after
repeated on the right, they believed that nothing on earth could prevent their
success during that expedition though it should last for years. The ass is the
sacred animal of Sītala, the goddess of smallpox, who is a form of Kāli. The
ears and also the bray of the ass would give it importance.

The noise of two cats heard fighting was propitious only during the first
watch of the night; if heard later in the night it was known as ‘Kāli ki mauj’
or ‘Kāli’s temper,’ and threatened evil, and if during the daytime as
‘Dhāmoni31 ki mauj,’ and was a prelude of great misfortune; while if the cats
fell from a height while fighting it was worst of all. The above shows that
the cat was also the animal of Kāli and is a point in favour of her derivation
from the tiger; and on this hypothesis the importance of the omen of the cat
is explained. If they obtained a good omen when in company with travellers
they believed that it was a direct order from heaven to kill them, and that if
they disobeyed the sign and let the travellers go they would never obtain any
more victims.32

Page 719

23. Omens and taboos

If a mare dropped a foal in their camp while they were travelling, they were
all contaminated or came under the Itak; and the only remedy for this was to
return home and start the journey afresh. Various other events33 also
produced the Itak, especially among the Deccan Thugs; these were the birth
of a child in a Thug family; the first courses of a Thug’s daughter; a marriage
in a Thug’s family; a death of any member of his family except an infant at
the breast; circumcision of a boy; a buffalo or cow giving calf or dying; and
a cat or dog giving a litter or dying. If a party fell under the Itak or
contamination at a time when it was extremely inconvenient or impossible to
return home, they sometimes marched back for a few miles and slept the
night, making a fresh start in the morning, and this was considered
equivalent to beginning a new journey after getting rid of the contamination.
If any member of the party sneezed on setting out on an expedition or on the
day’s march, it was a bad omen and required expiatory sacrifices; and if they
had travellers with them when this omen occurred, these must be allowed to
escape and could not be put to death. Omens were also taken from the
turban, without which no Thug, except perhaps in Bengal, would travel.34 If
a turban caught fire a great evil was portended, and the gang must, if near
home, return and wait for seven days. But if they had travelled for some
distance an offering of gur (sugar) was made, and the owner of the turban
alone returned home. If a man’s turban fell off it was also considered a very
bad omen, requiring expiatory sacrifices. The turban is important as being
the covering of the head, which many primitive people consider to contain
the life or soul (Golden Bough). A shower of rain falling at any time except
during the monsoon period from June to September was also a bad omen
which must be averted by sacrifices. Prior to the commencement35 of an
expedition a Brāhman was employed to select a propitious day and hour for
the start and for the direction in which the gang should proceed. After this
the auspices were taken with great solemnity and, if favourable omens were
obtained, the party set out and made a few steps in the direction indicated;

Page 720

after this they might turn to the right or left as impediments or incentives
presented themselves. If they heard any one weeping for a death as they left
the village, it threatened great evil; and so, too, if they met the corpse of any
one belonging to their own village, but not that of a stranger. And it was also
a bad omen to meet an oil-vendor, a carpenter, a potter, a dancing-master, a
blind or lame man, a Fakīr (beggar) with a brown waistband or a Jogi
(mendicant) with long matted hair. Most of these were included in the class
of persons who might not be killed.

24. Nature of the belief in omens

The custom of the Thugs, and in a less degree of ignorant and primitive
races generally, of being guided in their every action by the chance
indications afforded from the voices and movements of birds and animals
appears to the civilised mind extremely foolish. But its explanation is not
difficult when the character of early religious beliefs is realised. It was held
by savages generally that animals, birds and all other living things, as well as
trees and other inanimate objects, had souls and exercised conscious volition
like themselves. And those animals, such as the tiger and cow, and other
objects, such as the sun and moon and high mountains or trees, which
appeared most imposing and terrible, or exercised the most influence on
their lives, were their principal deities, the spirits of which at a later period
developed into anthropomorphic gods. Even the lesser animals and birds
were revered and considered to be capable of affecting the lives of men.
Hence their appearance, their flight and their cries were naturally taken to be
direct indications afforded by the god to his worshippers; and it was in the
interpretation of these, the signs given by the divine beings by whom man
was surrounded, and whom at one time he considered superior to himself,
that the science of augury consisted. “The priestesses of the oracle of Zeus at
Dodona called themselves doves, as those of Diana at Ephesus called
themselves bees; this proves that the oracles of the temples were formerly
founded on observations of the flight of doves and bees, and no doubt also
that the original cult consisted in the worship of these animals.”36 Thus, as is

Page 721

seen here, when the deity was no longer an animal but had developed into a
god in human shape, the animal remained associated with him and partook
of his sanctity; and what could be more natural than that he should convey
the indications of his will through the appearance, movements and cries of
the sacred animal to his human protégés. The pseudo-science of omens is
thus seen to be a natural corollary of the veneration of animals and inanimate
objects.

25. Suppression of Thuggee

When the suppression of the Thugs was seriously taken in hand by the
Thuggee and Dacoity Department under the direction of Sir William
Sleeman, this abominable confraternity, which had for centuries infested the
main roads of India and made away with tens of thousands of helpless
travellers, never to be heard of again by their families and friends, was
destroyed with comparatively little difficulty. The Thugs when arrested
readily furnished the fullest information of their murders and the names of
their confederates in return for the promise of their lives, and Colonel
Sleeman started a separate file or dossier for every Thug whose name
became known to him, in which all information obtained about him from
different informers was collected. In this manner, as soon as a man was
arrested and identified, a mass of evidence was usually at once forthcoming
to secure his conviction. Between 1826 and 1835 about 2000 Thugs were
arrested and hanged, transported or kept under restraint; subsequently to this
a larger number of British officers were deputed to the work of hunting
down the Thugs, and by 1848 it was considered that this form of crime had
been practically stamped out. For the support of the approver Thugs and the
families of these and others a labour colony was instituted at Jubbulpore,
which subsequently developed into the school of industry and was the parent
of the existing Reformatory School. Here these criminals were taught tent
and carpet-making and other trades, and in time grew to be ashamed of the
murderous calling in which they had once taken a pride.

Page 722

1 Thevenot’s Travels, Part III. p. 41, quoted in Dr. Sherwood’s account, Rāmaseeāna, p. 359.

2 Sleeman, p. 11.
3 P. 144.

4 P. 162.
5 P. 147.

6 P. 205.
7 Hutton’s Thugs and Dacoits.

8 Sleeman, p. 170.
9 Sleeman, p. 168.

10 He was called Feringia because he was born while his mother was fleeing from an attack on her
village by troops under European officers (Feringis).
11 Sleeman, p. 205.

12 Hutton, p. 70.
13 Ibidem, p. 71.

14 Pp. 34, 35.
15 See Cults, Customs and Superstitions of India, p. 249.

16 Pp. 32, 33.
17 Kandeli adjoins the headquarters station of Narsinghpur, the two towns being divided only by a
stream.

18 P. 23.
19 Near Bilehri in Jubbulpore.

20 Captain Lowis in Sleeman’s Report on the Thug Gangs (1840).
21 Pp. 15, 16.

22 P. 7.
23 P. 150.

24 Sleeman’s Report on the Thug Gangs, Introduction, p. vi.
25 P. 142.

26 P. 216.

Page 723

27 ‘Oh Kāli, Eater of Men, Oh great Kāli of Calcutta.’ The name Calcutta signifies Kāli-ghāt or
Kāli-kota, that is Kāli’s ferry or house. The story is that Job Charnock was exploring on the banks
of the Hoogly, when he found a widow about to be burnt as a sacrifice to Kāli. He rescued her, married
her, and founded a settlement on the site, which grew into the town of Calcutta.

28 P. 133.
29 P. 173.

30 Orphéus, p. 170.
31 Dhāmoni is an old ruined fort and town in the north of Saugor District, still a favourite haunt of
tigers; and the Thugs may often have lain there in concealment and heard the tigers quarrelling in
the jungle.

32 Sleeman, p. 196.
33 P. 91.

34 P. 67.
35 P. 100.

36 Orphéus (M. Salomon Reinach), p. 316.

Page 724

Page 725

Turi
List of Paragraphs

1. Origin of the caste
2. Subdivisions
3. Marriage
4. Funeral rites
5. Occupation
6. Social status

1. Origin of the caste

Turi.—A non-Aryan caste of cultivators, workers in bamboo, and basket-
makers, belonging to the Chota Nāgpur plateau. They number about 4000
persons in Raigarh, Sārangarh and the States recently transferred from
Bengal. The physical type of the Turis, Sir H. Risley states, their language,
and their religion place it beyond doubt that they are a Hinduised offshoot
of the Munda tribe. They still speak a dialect derived from Mundāri, and
their principal deity is Singbonga or the sun, the great god of the Mundas:
“In Lohardaga, where the caste is most numerous, it is divided into four
subcastes—Turi or Kisān-Turi, Or, Dom, and Domra—distinguished by the
particular modes of basket and bamboo-work which they practise. Thus the
Turi or Kisān-Turi, who are also cultivators and hold bhuinhāri land, make
the sūp, a winnowing sieve made of sirki, the upper joint of Saccharum
procerum; the tokri or tokiya, a large open basket of split bamboo twigs
woven up with the fibre of the leaves of the tāl palm; the sair and nadua,
used for catching fish. The Ors are said to take their name from the oriya
basket used by the sower, and made of split bamboo, sometimes helped out

Page 726

with tāl fibre. They also make umbrellas, and the chhota dali or dāla, a flat
basket with vertical sides used for handling grain in small quantities. Doms
make the harka and scale-pans (tarāju). Domras make the peti and fans.
Turis frequently reckon in as a fifth subcaste the Birhors, who cut bamboos
and make the sīkas used for carrying loads slung on a shoulder-yoke
(bhangi), and a kind of basket called phanda. Doms and Domras speak
Hindi; Turis, Ors and Birhors use among themselves a dialect of Mundāri.”1

2. Subdivisions

In Raigarh and Sārangarh of the Central Provinces the above subcastes are
not found, and there are no distinct endogamous groups; but the more
Hinduised members of the caste have begun to marry among themselves
and call themselves Turia, while they look down on the others to whom
they restrict the designation Turi. The names of subcastes given by Sir H.
Risley appear to indicate that the Turis are an offshoot from the Mundas,
with an admixture of Doms and other low Uriya castes. Among themselves
the caste is also known as Husil, a term which signifies a worker in
bamboo. The caste say that their original ancestor was created by
Singbonga, the sun, and had five sons, one of whom found a wooden image
of their deity in the Baranda forest, near the Barpahāri hill in Chota Nāgpur.
This image was adopted as their family deity, and is revered to the present
day as Barpahāri Deo. The deity is thus called after the hill, of which it is
clear that he is the personified representative. From the five sons are
descended the five main septs of the Turis. The eldest was called Mailuār,
and his descendants are the leaders or headmen of the caste. The group
sprung from the second son are known as Chardhagia, and it is their
business to purify and readmit offenders to caste intercourse. The
descendants of the third son conduct the ceremonial shaving of such
offenders, and are known as Surennār, while those of the fourth son bring
water for the ceremony and are called Tīrkuār. The fifth group is known as
Hasdagia, and it is said that they are the offspring of the youngest brother,

Page 727

who committed some offence, and the four other brothers took the parts
which are still played by their descendants in his ceremony of purification.
Traces of similar divisions appear to be found in Bengal, as Sir H. Risley
states that before a marriage can be celebrated the consent of the heads of
the Mādalwār and Surinwār sections, who are known respectively as Rāja
and Thākur, is obtained, while the head of the Charchāgiya section
officiates as priest. The above names are clearly only variants of those
found in the Central Provinces. But besides the above groups the Turis have
a large number of exogamous septs of a totemistic nature, some of which
are identical with those of the Mundas.

3. Marriage

Marriage is adult, and the bride and bridegroom are usually about the same
age; but girls are scarce in the caste, and betrothals are usually effected at
an early age, so that the fathers of boys may obtain brides for their sons. A
contract of betrothal, once made, cannot be broken without incurring social
disgrace, and compensation in money is also exacted. A small bride-price of
three or four rupees and a piece of cloth is payable to the girl’s father. As in
the case of some other Uriya castes the proposal for a marriage is couched
in poetic phraseology, the Turi bridegroom’s ambassador announcing his
business with the phrase: ‘I hear that a sweet-scented flower has blossomed
in your house and I have come to gather it’; to which the bride’s father, if
the match be acceptable, replies: ‘You may take away my flower if you will
not throw it away when its sweet scent has gone.’ The girl then appears, and
the boy’s father gives her a piece of cloth and throws a little liquor over her
feet. He then takes her on his lap and gives her an anna to buy a ring for
herself, and sometimes kisses her and says, ‘You will preserve my lineage.’
He washes the feet of her relatives, and the contract of betrothal is thus
completed, and its violation by either party is a serious matter. The wedding
is performed according to the ritual commonly practised by the Uriya
castes. The binding portion of it consists in the perambulation of the sacred
pole five or seven times. After each circle the bridegroom takes hold of the

Page 728

bride’s toe and makes her kick away a small heap of rice on which a nut and
a pice coin are placed. After this a cloth is held over the couple and each
rubs vermilion on the other’s forehead. At this moment the bride’s brother
appears, and gives the bridegroom a blow on the back. This is probably in
token of his wrath at being deprived of his sister. A meal of rice and fowls is
set before the bridegroom, but he feigns displeasure, and refuses to eat
them. The bride’s parents then present him with a pickaxe and a crooked
knife, saying that these are the implements of their trade, and will suffice
him for a livelihood. The bridegroom, however, continues obdurate until
they promise him a cow or a bullock, when he consents to eat. The bride’s
family usually spend some twenty or more rupees on her wedding, and the
bridegroom’s family about fifty rupees. A widow is expected to marry her
Dewar or deceased husband’s younger brother, and if she takes somebody
else he must repay to the Dewar the expenditure incurred by the latter’s
family on her first marriage. Divorce is permitted for misconduct on the
part of the wife or for incompatibility of temper.

4. Funeral rites

The caste bury the dead, placing the head to the north. They make libations
to the spirits of their ancestors on the last day of Phāgun (February), and not
during the fortnight of Pitripaksh in Kunwār (September) like other Hindu
castes. They believe that the spirits of ancestors are reborn in children, and
when a baby is born they put a grain of rice into a pot of water and then five
other grains in the names of ancestors recently deceased. When one of these
meets the grain representing the child they hold that the ancestor in question
has been born again. The principal deity of the caste is Singbonga, the sun,
and according to one of their stories the sun is female. They say that the sun
and moon were two sisters, both of whom had children, but when the sun
gave out great heat the moon was afraid that her children would be burnt
up, so she hid them in a handi or earthen pot. When the sun missed her
sister’s children she asked her where they were, and the moon replied that
she had eaten them up; on which the sun also ate up her own children. But

Page 729

when night came the moon took her children out of the earthen pot and they
spread out in the sky and became the stars. And when the sun saw this she
was greatly angered and vowed that she would never look on the moon’s
face again. And it is on this account that the moon is not seen in the
daytime, and as the sun ate up all her children there are no stars during the
day.

5. Occupation

The caste make and sell all kinds of articles manufactured from the wood of
the bamboo, and the following list of their wares will give an idea of the
variety of purposes for which this product is utilised: Tukna, an ordinary
basket; dauri, a basket for washing rice in a stream; lodhar, a large basket
for carrying grain on carts; chuki, a small basket for measuring grain; garni
and sikosi, a small basket for holding betel-leaf and a box for carrying it in
the pocket; dhitori, a fish-basket; dholi, a large bamboo shed for storing
grain; ghurki and paili, grain measures; chhanni, a sieve; taji) a balance;
pankha and bijna, fans; pelna, a triangular frame for a fishing-net; choniya,
a cage for catching fish; chatai) matting; chhāta, an umbrella; chhitori, a
leaf hat for protecting the body from rain; pinjra, a cage; khunkhuna, a
rattle; and guna, a muzzle for bullocks.

Most of them are very poor, and they say that when Singbonga made their
ancestors he told them to fetch something in which to carry away the grain
which he would give them for their support; but the Turis brought a bamboo
sieve, and when Singbonga poured the grain into the sieve nearly the whole
of it ran out. So he reproved them for their foolishness, and said, ‘Khasar,
khasar, tīn pasar,’ which meant that, however hard they should work, they
would never earn more than three handfuls of grain a day.

Page 730

6. Social status

The social status of the Turis is very low, and their touch is regarded as
impure. They must live outside the village and may not draw water from the
common well; the village barber will not shave them nor the washerman
wash their clothes. They will eat all kinds of food, including the flesh of rats
and other vermin, but not beef. The rules regarding social impurity are more
strictly observed in the Uriya country than elsewhere, owing to the
predominant influence of the Brāhmans, and this is probably the reason
why the Turis are so severely ostracised. Their code of social morality is not
strict, and a girl who is seduced by a man of the caste is simply made over
to him as his wife, the ordinary bride-price being exacted from him. He
must also feed the caste-fellows, and any money which is received by the
girl’s father is expended in the same manner. Members of Hindu castes and
Gonds may be admitted into the community, but not the Munda tribes, such
as the Mundas themselves and the Kharias and Korwas; and this, though the
Turis, as has been seen, are themselves an offshoot of the Munda tribe. The
fact indicates that in Chota Nāgpur the tribes of the Munda family occupy a
lower social position than the Gonds and others belonging to the Dravidian
family. When an offender of either sex is to be readmitted into caste after
having been temporarily expelled for some offence he or she is given water
to drink and has a lock of hair cut off. Their women are tattooed on the
arms, breast and feet, and say that this is the only ornament which they can
carry to the grave.

1 Tribes and Castes of Bengal, art. Turi.

Page 731

Velama

1. Origin and social status

Velama, Elama, Yelama.—A Telugu cultivating caste found in large
numbers in Vizagapatam and Ganjām, while in 1911 about 700 persons
were returned from Chānda and other districts in the Central Provinces. The
caste frequently also call themselves by the honorific titles of Naidu or
Dora (lord). The Velamas are said formerly to have been one with the
Kamma caste, but to have separated on the question of retaining the custom
of parda or gosha which they had borrowed from the Muhammadans. The
Kammas abandoned parda, and, signing a bond written on palm-leaf to this
effect, obtained their name from kamma, a leaf. The Velamas retained the
custom, but a further division has taken place on the subject, and one
subcaste, called the Adi or original Velamas, do not seclude their women.
The caste has at present a fairly high position, and several important Madras
chiefs are Velamas, as well as the zamīndār of Sironcha in the Central
Provinces. They appear, however, to have improved their status, and thus to
have incurred the jealousy of their countrymen, as is evidenced by some
derogatory sayings current about the caste. Thus the Balijas call them Gūni
Sakalvāndlu or hunchbacked washermen, because some of them print
chintz and carry their goods in a bundle on their backs.1 According to
another derivation gūna is the large pot in which they dye their cloth.
Another story is that the name of the caste is Velimāla, meaning those who
are above or better than the Dhers, and was a title conferred on them by the
Rāja of Bastar in recognition of the bravery displayed by the Velamas in his
army. These stories are probably the outcome of the feeling of jealousy
which attaches to castes which have raised themselves in the social scale.
The customs of the Velamas do not indicate a very high standard of

Page 732

ceremonial observance, as they eat fowls and pork and drink liquor. They
are said to take food from Bestas and Dhīmars, while Kunbis will take it
from them. The men of the caste are tall and strong, of a comparatively fair
complexion and of a bold and arrogant demeanour. It is said that a Velama
will never do anything himself which a servant can do for him, and a story
is told of one of them who was smoking when a spark fell on his
moustache. He called his servant to remove it, but by the time the man
came, his master’s moustache had been burnt away. These stories and the
customs of the Velamas appear to indicate that they are a caste of
comparatively low position, who have gone up in the world, and are
therefore tenacious in asserting a social position which is not universally
admitted. Their subcastes show that a considerable difference in standing
exists in the different branches of the caste. Of these the Rācha or royal
Velamas, to whom the chiefs and zamīndārs belong, are the highest. While
others are the Gūna Velamas or those who use a dyer’s pot, the Eku or
‘Cotton-skein’ who are weavers and carders, and the Tellāku or white leaf
Velamas, the significance of this last name not being known. It is probable
that the Velamas were originally a branch of the great Kāpu or Reddi caste
of cultivators, corresponding in the Telugu country to the Kurmis and
Kunbis, as many of their section names are the same as those of the Kāpus.
The Velamas apparently took up the trades of weaving and dyeing, and
some of them engaged in military service and acquired property. These are
now landowners and cultivators and breed cattle, while others dye and
weave cloth. They will not engage themselves as hired labourers, and they
do not allow their women to work in the fields.

2. Marriage and social customs

The caste are said to have 77 exogamous groups descended from the 77
followers or spearsmen who attended Rāja Rudra Pratāp of Bastar when he
was ousted from Wārangal. These section names are eponymous, territorial
and totemistic, instances of the last kind being Cherukunūla from cheruku,
sugarcane, and Pasapunūla from pasapu, turmeric, and nūla, thread.

Page 733

Marriage within the section or gotra is prohibited, but first cousins may
intermarry. Marriage is usually adult, and the binding portion of the
ceremony consists in the tying of the mangal-sūtram or happy thread by the
bridegroom round the bride’s neck. At the end of the marriage the kankans
or bracelets of the bridegroom and bride are taken off in signification that
all obstacles to complete freedom of intercourse and mutual confidence
between the married pair have been removed. In past years, when the Gūna
Velamas had a marriage, they were bound to pay the marriage expenses of a
couple of the Palli or fisherman caste, in memory of the fact that on one
occasion when the Gūna Velamas were in danger of being exterminated by
their enemies, the Pallis rescued them in their boats and carried them to a
place of safety. But now it is considered sufficient to hang up a fishing-net
in the house when a marriage ceremony of the Gūna Velamas is being
celebrated.2 The caste do not permit the marriage of widows, and divorce is
confined to cases in which a wife is guilty of adultery. The Velamas usually
employ Vaishnava Brāhmans as their priests. They burn the bodies of those
who die after marriage, and bury those dying before it. Children are named
on the twenty-first day after birth, the child being placed in a swing, and the
name selected by the parents being called out three times by the oldest
woman present. On this day the mother is taken to a well and made to draw
a bucket of water by way of declaration that she is fit to do household work.

1 North Arcot Manual, i. p. 216.
2 Indian Antiquary (1879), p. 216.

Page 734

Vidur
List of Paragraphs

1. Origin and traditions
2. The Purads, Golaks and Borals
3. Illegitimacy among Hindustāni castes
4. Legend of origin
5. Marriage
6. Social rules and occupation

1. Origin and traditions

Vidur,1 Bidur.—A Marātha caste numbering 21,000 persons in the Central
Provinces in 1911, and found in the Nāgpur Division and Berār. They are
also returned from Hyderābād and Bombay. Vidur means a wise or
intelligent man, and was the name of the younger brother of Pāndu, the
father of the Pāndava brothers. The Vidurs are a caste of mixed descent,
principally formed from the offspring of Brāhman fathers with women of
other castes. But the descendants of Panchāls, Kunbis, Mālis and others
from women of lower caste are also known as Vidurs and are considered as
different subcastes. Each of these groups follow the customs and usually
adopt the occupation of the castes to which their fathers belonged. They are
known as Kharchi or Khāltātya, meaning ‘Below the plate’ or ‘Below the
salt,’ as they are not admitted to dine with the proper Vidurs. But the rule
varies in different places, and sometimes after the death of their mother
such persons become full members of the caste, and with each succeeding
generation the status of their descendants improves. In Poona the name
Vidur is restricted to the descendants of Brāhman fathers, and they are also

Page 735

known as Brāhmanja or ‘Born from Brāhmans.’ Elsewhere the Brāhman
Vidurs are designated especially as Krishnapakshi, which means ‘One born
during the dark fortnight,’ The term Krishnapakshi is or was also used in
Bengal, and Buchanan defined it as follows: “Men of the Rājpūt, Khatri and
Kāyasth tribes, but no others, openly keep women slaves of any pure tribe,
and the children are of the same caste with their father, but are called
Krishnapakshis and can only marry with each other.”2 In Bastar a
considerable class of persons of similar illegitimate descent also exist, being
the offspring of the unions of immigrant Hindus with women of the Gond,
Halba and other tribes. The name applied to them, however, is Dhākar, and
as their status and customs are quite different from those of the Marātha
Vidurs they are treated in a short separate article.

2. The Purads, Golaks and Borals

Another small group related to the Vidurs are the Purāds of Nāgpur; they
say that their ancestor was a Brāhman who was carried away in a flooded
river and lost his sacred thread. He could not put on a new thread afterwards
because the sacred thread must be changed without swallowing the spittle in
the interval. Hence he was put out of caste and his descendants are the
Purāds, the name being derived from pūr, a flood. These people are mainly
shopkeepers. In Berār two other groups are found, the Golaks and Borals.
The Golaks are the illegitimate offspring of a Brāhman widow; if after her
husband’s decease she did not shave her head, her illegitimate children are
known as Rand3 Golaks; if her head was shaved, they are called Mund
(shaven) Golaks; and if their father be unknown, they are named Kund
Golaks. The Golaks are found in Malkāpur and Bālāpur and number about
400 persons. A large proportion of them are beggars. A Boral is said to be
the child of a father of any caste and a mother of one of those in which
widows shave their heads. As a matter of fact widows, except among
Brāhmans, rarely shave their heads in the Central Provinces, and it would
therefore appear, if Mr. Kitts’ definition is correct, that the Borals are the

Page 736

offspring of women by fathers of lower caste than themselves; a most
revolting union to Hindu ideas. As, however, the Borals are mostly grocers
and shopkeepers, it is possible that they may be the same class as the
Purāds. In 1881 they numbered only 163 persons and were found in
Dārhwa, Mehkar and Chikhli tāluks.

3. Illegitimacy among Hindustāni castes

There is no caste corresponding to the Vidurs in the Hindi Districts and the
offspring of unions which transgress the caste marriage rules are variously
treated. Many castes both in the north and south say that they have 12½
subdivisions and that the half subcaste comprises the descendants of illicit
unions. Of course the twelve subdivisions are as a rule mythical, the
number of subcastes being always liable to fluctuate as fresh endogamous
groups are formed by migration or slight changes in the caste calling. Other
castes have a Lohri Sen or degraded group which corresponds to the half
caste. In other cases the illegitimate branch has a special name; thus the
Nīche Pāt Bundelas of Saugor and Chhoti Tar Rājpūts of Nimār are the
offspring of fathers of the Bundela and other Rājpūt tribes with women of
lower castes; both these terms have the same meaning as Lohri Sen, that is a
low-caste or bastard group. Similarly the Dauwa (wet-nurse) Ahīrs are the
offspring of Bundela fathers and the Ahīr women who act as nurses in their
households. In Saugor is found a class of persons called Kunwar4 who are
descended from the offspring of the Marātha Brāhman rulers of Saugor and
their kept women. They now form a separate caste and Hindustāni
Brāhmans will take water from them. They refuse to accept katcha food
(cooked with water) from Marātha Brāhmans, which all other castes will
do. Another class of bastard children of Brāhmans are called Dogle, and
such people commonly act as servants of Marātha Brāhmans; as these
Brāhmans do not take water to drink from the hands of any caste except
their own, they have much difficulty in procuring household servants and
readily accept a Dogle in this capacity without too close a scrutiny of his

Page 737

antecedents. There is also a class of Dogle Kāyasths of similar, origin, who
are admitted as members of the caste on an inferior status and marry among
themselves. After several generations such groups tend to become
legitimised; thus the origin of the distinction between the Khare and Dūsre
Srivāstab Kāyasths and the Dasa and Bīsa Agarwāla Banias was probably of
this character, but now both groups are reckoned as full members of the
caste, one only ranking somewhat below the other so that they do not take
food together. The Pārwār Banias have four divisions of different social
status known as the Bare, Manjhile, Sanjhile and Lohri Seg or Sen, or first,
second, third and fourth class. A man and woman detected in a serious
social offence descend into the class next below their own, unless they can
pay the severe penalties prescribed for it. If either marries or forms a
connection with a man or woman of a lower class they descend into that
class. Similarly, one who marries a widow goes into the Lohri Seg or lowest
class. Other castes have a similar system of divisions. Among the great
body of Hindus cases of men living with women of different caste are now
very common, and the children of such unions sometimes inherit their
father’s property. Though in such cases the man is out of caste this does not
mean that he is quite cut off from social intercourse. He will be invited to
the caste dinners, but must sit in a different row from the orthodox members
so as not to touch them. As an instance of these mixed marriages the case of
a private servant, a Māli or gardener, may be quoted. He always called
himself a Brāhman, and though thinking it somewhat curious that a
Brāhman should be a gardener, I took no notice of it until he asked leave to
attend the funeral of his niece, whose father was a Government menial, an
Agarwāla Bania. It was then discovered that he was the son of a Brāhman
landowner by a mistress of the Kāchhi caste of sugarcane and vegetable
growers, so that the profession of a private or ornamental gardener, for
which a special degree of intelligence is requisite, was very suitable to him.
His sister by the same parents was married to this Agarwāla Bania, who
said his own family was legitimate and he had been deceived about the girl.
The marriage of one of this latter couple’s daughters was being arranged
with the son of a Brāhman, father and Bania mother in Jubbulpore; while
the gardener himself had never been married, but was living with a girl of
the Gadaria (shepherd) caste who had been married in her caste but had
never lived with her husband. Inquiries made in a small town as to the

Page 738

status of seventy families showed that ten were out of caste on account of
irregular matrimonial or sexual relations; and it may therefore be concluded
that a substantial proportion of Hindus have no real caste at present.

4. Legend of origin

The Vidurs say that they are the descendants of a son who was born to a
slave girl by the sage Vyās, the celebrated compiler of the Mahābhārata, to
whom the girl was sent to provide an heir to the kingdom of Hastināpur.
This son was named Vidur and was remarkable for his great wisdom, being
one of the leading characters in the Mahābhārata and giving advice both to
the Pāndavas and the Kauravas.

5. Marriage

As already stated, the Vidurs who are sprung from fathers of different castes
form subcastes marrying among themselves. Among the Brāhman Vidurs
also, a social difference exists between the older members of the caste who
are descended from Vidurs for several generations, and the new ones who
are admitted into it as being the offspring of Brāhman fathers from recent
illicit unions, the former considering themselves to be superior and avoiding
intermarriage with the latter as far as possible. The Brāhman Vidurs, to
whom this article chiefly relates, have exogamous sections of different
kinds, the names being eponymous, territorial, titular and totemistic. Among
the names of their sections are Indurkar from Indore; Chaurikār, a whisk-
maker; Achārya and Pānde, a priest; Menjokhe, a measurer of wax; Mīne, a
fish; Dūdhmānde, one who makes wheaten cakes with milk; Goihe, a lizard;
Wadābhāt, a ball of pulse and cooked rice; Diwāle, bankrupt; and Joshi, an
astrologer. The Brāhman Vidurs have the same sect groups as the Marātha

Page 739

Brāhmans, according to the Veda which they especially revere. Marriage is
forbidden within the section and in that of the paternal and maternal uncles
and aunts. In Chānda, when a boy of one section marries a girl of another,
all subsequent alliances between members of the two sections must follow
the same course, and a girl of the first section must not marry a boy of the
second. This rule is probably in imitation of that by which their caste is
formed, that is from the union of a man of higher with a woman of lower
caste. As already stated, the reverse form of connection is considered most
disgraceful by the Hindus, and children born of it could not be Vidurs. On
the same analogy they probably object to taking both husbands and wives
from the same section. Marriage is usually infant, and a second wife is
taken only if the first be barren or if she is sickly or quarrelsome. As a rule,
no price is paid either for the bride or bridegroom. Vidurs have the same
marriage ceremony as Marātha Brāhmans, except that Purānic instead of
Vedic mantras or texts are repeated at the service. As among the lower
castes the father of a boy seeks for a bride for his son, while with Brāhmans
it is the girl’s father who makes the proposal. When the bridegroom arrives
he is conducted to the inner room of the bride’s house; Mr. Tucker states
that this is known as the Gaurighar because it contains the shrine of Gauri
or Pārvati, wife of Mahādeo; and here he is received by the bride who has
been occupied in worshipping the goddess. A curtain is held between them
and coloured rice is thrown over them and distributed, and they then
proceed to the marriage-shed, where an earthen mound or platform, known
as Bohala, has been erected. They first sit on this on two stools and then fire
is kindled on the platform and they walk five times round it. The Bohala is
thus a fire altar. The expenses of marriage amount for the bridegroom’s
family to Rs. 300 on an average, and for the bride’s to a little more. Widows
are allowed to remarry, but the second union must not take place with any
member of the family of the late husband, whose property remains with his
children or, failing them, with his family. In the marriage of a widow the
common pāt ceremony of the Marātha Districts is used. A price is
commonly paid to the parents of a widow by her second husband. Divorce
is allowed on the instance of the husband by a written agreement, and
divorced women may marry again by the pāt ceremony. In Chānda it is
stated that when a widower marries again a silver or golden image is made

Page 740

of the first wife and being placed with the household gods is daily
worshipped by the second wife.

6. Social rules and occupation

The Vidurs employ Marātha Brāhmans for religious and ceremonial
purposes, while their gurus are either Brāhmans or Bairāgis. They have two
names, one for ceremonial and the other for ordinary use. When a child is to
be named it is placed in a cradle and parties of women sit on opposite sides
of it. One of the women takes the child in her arms and passes it across the
cradle to another saying, ‘Take the child named Rāmchandra’ or whatever it
may be. The other woman passes the child back using the same phrase, and
it is then placed in the cradle and rocked, and boiled wheat and gram are
distributed to the party. The Vidurs burn the dead, and during the period of
mourning the well-to-do employ a Brāhman to read the Garud Purān to
them, which tells how a sinner is punished in the next world and a virtuous
man is rewarded. This, it is said, occupies their minds and prevents them
from feeling their bereavement. They will take food only from Marātha
Brāhmans and water from Rājpūts and Kunbis. Brāhmans will, as a rule, not
take anything from a Vidur’s hand, but some of them have begun to accept
water and sweetmeats, especially in the case of educated Vidurs. The Vidurs
will not eat flesh of any kind nor drink liquor. The Brāhman Vidurs did not
eat in kitchens in the famine. Their dress resembles that of Marātha
Brāhmans. The men do not usually wear the sacred thread, but some have
adopted it. In Bombay, however, boys are regularly invested with the sacred
thread before the age of ten.5 In Nāgpur it is stated that the Vidurs like to be
regarded as Brāhmans.6 They are now quite respectable and hold land.
Many of them are in Government service, some being officers of the
subordinate grades and others clerks, and they are also agents to
landowners, patwāris and shopkeepers. The Vidurs are the best educated
caste with the exception of Brāhmans, Kāyasths and Banias, and this fact
has enabled them to obtain a considerable rise in social status. Their

Page 741

aptitude for learning may be attributed to their Brāhman parentage, while in
some cases Vidurs have probably been given an education by their Brāhman
relatives. Their correct position should be a low one, distinctly beneath that
of the good cultivating castes. A saying has it, ‘As the amarbel creeper has
no roots, so the Vidur has no ancestry.’ But owing to their education and
official position the higher classes of Vidurs have obtained a social status
not much below that of Kāyasths. This rise in position is assisted by their
adherence in matters of dress, food and social practice to the customs of
Marātha Brāhmans, so that many of them are scarcely distinguishable from
a Brāhman. A story is told of a Vidur Tahsīldār or Naib-Tahsīldār who was
transferred to a District at some distance from his home, and on his arrival
there pretended to be a Marātha Brāhman. He was duly accepted by the
other Brāhmans, who took food with him in his house and invited him to
their own. After an interval of some months the imposture was discovered,
and it is stated that this official was at a short subsequent period dismissed
from Government service on a charge of bribery. The Vidurs are also
considered to be clever at personation, and one or two stories are told of
frauds being carried out through a Vidur returning to some family in the
character of a long-lost relative.

1 This article is compiled from papers by Mr. W.A. Tucker, Extra Assistant Commissioner,
Bhandāra, and Mr. B.M. Deshmukh, Pleader, Chānda.

2 Buchanan, Eastern India, i. p. 186.
3 Rand = widow or prostitute.

4 The term Kunwar is a title applied to the eldest son of a chief.
5 Bombay Gazetteer, vol. xviii. p. 185.

6 Nagpur Settlement Report, p. 27.

Page 742

Wāghya
Wāghya,1 Vāghe, Murli.—An order of mendicant devotees of the god
Khandoba, an incarnation of Siva; they belong to the Marātha Districts and
Bombay where Khandoba is worshipped. The term Wāghya is derived from
vāgh, a tiger, and has been given to the order on account of the small bag of
tiger-skin, containing bhandār, or powdered turmeric, which they carry
round their necks. This has been consecrated to Khandoba and they apply a
pinch of it to the foreheads of those who give them alms. Murli, signifying
‘a flute’ is the name given to female devotees. Wāghya is a somewhat
indefinite term and in the Central Provinces does not strictly denote a caste.
The order originated in the practice followed by childless mothers of
vowing to Khandoba that if they should bear a child, their first-born should
be devoted to his service. Such a child became a Wāghya or Murli
according as it was a boy or a girl. But they were not necessarily severed
from their own caste and might remain members of it and marry in it. Thus
there are Wāghya Telis in Wardha, who marry with other Telis. The child
might also be kept in the temple for a period and then withdrawn, and
nowadays this is always done. The children of rich parents sometimes
simply remain at home and worship Khandoba there. But they must beg on
every Sunday from at least five persons all their lives. Another practice,
formerly existing, was for the father and mother to vow that if a child was
born they would be swung. They were then suspended from a wooden post
on a rope by an iron hook inserted in the back and swung round four or five
times. The sacred turmeric was applied to the wound and it quickly healed
up. Others would take a Wāghya child to Mahādeo’s cave in Pachmarhi and
let it fall from the top of a high tree. If it lived it was considered to be a
Rāja of Mahādeo, and if it died happiness might confidently be anticipated
for it in the next birth. Besides the children who are dedicated to Khandoba,
a man may become a Wāghya either for life or for a certain period in
fulfilment of a vow, and in the latter case will be an ordinary member of his
own caste again on its termination. The Wāghyas and Murlis who are
permanent members of the order sometimes also live together and have

Page 743

children who are brought up in it. The constitution of the order is therefore
in several respects indefinite, and it has not become a self-contained caste,
though there are Wāghyas who have no other caste.

Wāghya mendicants

Page 744

The following description of the dedication of children to Khandoba is
taken from the Bombay Gazetteer2. When parents have to dedicate a boy to
Khandoba they go to his temple at Jejuri in Poona on any day in the month
of Chaitra (March-April). They stay at a Gurao’s house and tell him the
object of their visit. The boy’s father brings offerings and they go in
procession to Khandoba’s temple. There the Gurao marks the boy’s brow
with turmeric, throws turmeric over his head, fastens round his neck a deer-
or tiger-skin wallet hung from a black woollen string and throws turmeric
over the god, asking him to take the boy. The Murlis or girls dedicated to
the god are married to him between one and twelve years of age. The girl is
taken to the temple by her parents accompanied by the Gurao priest and
other Murlis. At the temple she is bathed and her body rubbed with
turmeric, with which the feet of the idol are also anointed. She is dressed in
a new robe and bodice, and green glass bangles are put on her wrists. A
turban and sash are presented to the god, and the guru taking a necklace of
nine cowries (shells) fastens it round the girl’s neck. She then stands before
the god, a cloth being held between them as at a proper wedding, and the
priest repeats the marriage verses. Powdered turmeric is thrown on the
heads of the girl and of the idol, and from that day she is considered to be
the wife of Khandoba and cannot marry any other man. When a Murli
comes of age she sits by herself for four days. Then she looks about for a
patron, and when she succeeds in getting one she calls a meeting of her
brethren, the Wāghyas, and in their presence the patron says, ‘I will fill the
Murli’s lap.’ The Wāghyas ask him what he will pay and after some
haggling a sum is agreed on, which thirty years ago varied between twenty-
five and a hundred rupees. If it is more than Rs. 50 a half of the money goes
to the community, who spend it on a feast. With the balance the girl buys
clothes for herself. She lives with her patron for as long as he wishes to
keep her, and is then either attached to the temple or travels about as a
female mendicant. Sometimes a married woman will leave her home and
become a Murli, with the object as a rule of leading a vicious life.

A man who takes a vow to become a Wāghya must be initiated by a guru,
who is some elder member of the order. The initiation takes place early on a
Sunday morning, and after the disciple is shaved, bathed and newly clad,
the guru places a string of cowries round his neck and gives him the tiger-

Page 745

skin bag in which the turmeric is kept. He always retains much reverence
for his guru, and invokes him with the exclamation, ‘Jai Guru,’ before
starting out to beg in the morning. The following articles are carried by the
Wāghyas when begging. The dapdi a circular single drum of wood, covered
with goat-skin, and suspended to the shoulder. The chouka consists of a
single wire suspended from a bar and passing inside a hollow wooden
conical frame. The wire is struck with a stick to produce the sound. The
ghāti is an ordinary temple bell; and the kutumba is a metal saucer which
serves for a begging-bowl. This is considered sacred, and sandalwood is
applied to it before starting out in the morning. The Wāghyas usually beg in
parties of four, each man carrying one of these articles. Two of them walk in
front and two behind, and they sing songs in praise of Khandoba and play
on the instruments. Every Wāghya has also the bag made of tiger-skin, or, if
this cannot be had, of deer-skin, and the cowrie necklace, and a seli or
string of goat-hair round the neck. Alms, after being received in the
kutumba or saucer, are carried in a bag, and before setting out in the
morning they put a little grain in this bag, as they think that it would be
unlucky to start with it empty. At the end of the day they set out their
takings on the ground and make a little offering of fire to them, throwing a
pinch of turmeric in the air in the name of Khandoba. The four men then
divide the takings and go home. Marāthas, Murlis and Telis are the castes
who revere Khandoba, and they invite the Wāghyas to sing on the Dasahra
and also at their marriages. In Bombay the Wāghyas force iron bars through
their calves and pierce the palms of their hands with needles. To the needle
a strip of wood is attached, and on this five lighted torches are set out, and
the Wāghya waves them about on his hand before the god.3 Once in three
years each Wāghya makes a pilgrimage to Khandoba’s chief temple at
Jejuri near Poona, and there are also local temples to this deity at
Hinganghāt and Nāgpur. The Wāghyas eat flesh and drink liquor, and their
social and religious customs resemble those of the Marāthas and Kunbis.

1 This article is partly based on a paper by Pandit Pyāre Lāl Misra, ethnographic clerk.
2 Vol. xx. pp. 189–190.
3 Bombay Gazetteer; vol. xxii. p. 212.

Page 746

Page 747

Yerūkala
Yerūkala.—A vagrant gipsy tribe of Madras of whom a small number are
returned from the Chānda District. They live by thieving, begging, fortune-
telling and making baskets, and are usually treated as identical with the
Koravas or Kuravas, who have the same occupations. Both speak a corrupt
Tamil, and the Yerūkalas are said to call one another Kurru or Kura. It has
been supposed that Korava was the Tamil name which in the Telugu
country became Yerukalavāndlu or fortune-teller. Mr. (Sir H.) Stewart
thought there could be no doubt of the identity of the two castes,1 though
Mr. Francis points out differences between them.2 The Yerūkalas are expert
thieves. They frequent villages on the pretence of begging, and rob by day
in regular groups under a female leader, who is known as Jemādārin. Each
gang is provided with a bunch of keys and picklocks. They locate a locked
house in an unfrequented lane, and one of them stands in front as if
begging; the remainder are posted as watchers in the vicinity, and the
Jemādārin picks the lock and enters the house. When the leader comes out
with the booty she locks the door and they all walk away. If any one comes
up while the leader is in the house the woman at the door engages him in
conversation by some device, such as producing a silver coin and asking if
it is good. She then begins to dispute, and laying hold of him calls out to her
comrades that the man has abused her or been taking liberties with her. The
others run up and jostle him away from the door, and while they are all
occupied with the quarrel the thief escapes. Or an old woman goes from
house to house pretending to be a fortune-teller. When she finds a woman at
home alone, she flatters and astonishes her by relating the chief events in
her life, how many children she has, how many more are coming, and so
on. When the woman of the house is satisfied that the fortune-teller has
supernatural powers, she allows the witch to cover her face with her robe,
and shuts her eyes while the fortune-teller breathes on them, and blows into
her ears and sits muttering charms. Meanwhile one or two of the latter’s
friends who have been lurking close by walk into the house and carry away

Page 748

whatever they can lay their hands on. When they have left the house the
woman’s face is uncovered and the fortune-teller takes her fee and departs,
leaving her dupe to find out that her house has been robbed.3 The conjugal
morals of these people are equally low. They sell or pledge their wives and
unmarried daughters, and will take them back on the redemption of the
pledge with any children born in the interval, as though nothing out of the
ordinary had happened. When a man is sentenced to imprisonment his wife
selects another partner for the period of her husband’s absence, going back
to him on his release with all her children, who are considered as his. Mr.
Thurston gives the following story of a gang of Koravas or Yerūkalas in
Tinnevelly: “One morning, in Tinnevelly, while the butler in a missionary’s
house was attending to his duties, an individual turned up with a fine fowl
for sale. The butler, finding that he could purchase it for about half the real
price, bought it, and showed it to his wife with no small pride in his ability
in making a bargain. But he was distinctly crestfallen when his wife pointed
out that it was his own bird, which had been lost on the previous night. The
seller was a Korava.”4 In Madras they have also now developed into expert
railway thieves. They have few restrictions as to food, eating cats and mice,
though not dogs.5 The Yerūkalas practised the custom of the Couvade as
described by the Rev. John Cain, of Dumagudem:6 “Directly the woman
feels the birth-pangs she informs her husband, who immediately takes some
of her clothes, puts them on, places on his forehead the mark which the
women usually place on theirs, retires into a dark room where there is only
a very dim lamp, and lies down on the bed, covering himself up with a long
cloth. When the child is born it is washed and placed on the cot beside the
father. Asafoetida, jaggery and other articles are then given, not to the
mother but to the father. During the days of ceremonial impurity the man is
treated as other Hindus treat their women on such occasions. He is not
allowed to leave his bed, but has everything needful brought to him.

“The Yerūkalas marry when quite young. At the birth of a daughter the
father of an unmarried little boy often brings a rupee and ties it in the cloth
of the father of a newly-born girl. When the girl is grown up he can then
claim her for his son.”

Page 749

1 Madras Census Report (1891).

2 Madras Census Report (1901).
3 Bombay Gazetteer, vol. xxi. pp. 170, 171.

4 Tribes and Castes of Southern India, art. Korava.
5 North Arcot Manual, p. 247.

6 Ind. Ant. vol. iii., 1874, p. 157.

Page 750

The End

Printed by R. & R. Clark, Limited, Edinburgh.

Page 751

Colophon

Availability

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no
restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the
terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
www.gutenberg.org.

This eBook is produced by Jeroen Hellingman and and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team at www.pgdp.net from page images provided by the
Million Books Project, supplemented with scans of the illustrations from
original copies.

Encoding

Revision History

19-FEB-2004 Added TEI tagging.

Corrections

The following corrections have been applied to the text:

Location Source Correction
Page 3 [Not in source] ”
Page 229 Lakshhmi Lakshmi
Page 268 Unrol Unroll
Page 268 unrol unroll
Page 269 [Not in source] ,
Page 327 to as
Page 367 kepeer keeper

Page 752

Page 460 Rāhtors Rāthors
Page 554 Acacta Acacia
Page 573 [Not in source] ”

Page 753

*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE TRIBES AND
CASTES OF THE CENTRAL PROVINCES OF INDIA, VOLUME 4 ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
States without permission and without paying copyright royalties.
Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license,
apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic
works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and
trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not
be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of
the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the Project
Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for copies of this
eBook, complying with the trademark license is very easy. You may
use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative
works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg eBooks
may be modified and printed and given away—you may do practically
ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S.
copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license,
especially commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE

Page 754

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG™ LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or
any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
Gutenberg License available with this file or online at
www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing
Project Gutenberg electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg electronic
work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept
all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
all copies of Project Gutenberg electronic works in your possession. If
you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg
electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms of this
agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom
you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people
who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg electronic
works. See paragraph 1.E below.

Page 755

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the
collection of Project Gutenberg electronic works. Nearly all the
individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the
United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in
the United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
that you will support the Project Gutenberg mission of promoting free
access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg works
in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project
Gutenberg name associated with the work. You can easily comply with
the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format
with its attached full Project Gutenberg License when you share it
without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
other Project Gutenberg work. The Foundation makes no
representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
access to, the full Project Gutenberg License must appear prominently
whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg work (any work on which
the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase
“Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed,
viewed, copied or distributed:

Page 756

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States
and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
under the terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License included with
this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located
in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the
country where you are located before using this eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg electronic work is derived
from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a
notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright
holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the United
States without paying any fees or charges. If you are redistributing or
providing access to a work with the phrase “Project Gutenberg”
associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply either with
the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain
permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg
trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
will be linked to the Project Gutenberg License for all works posted
with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of
this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg License.

Page 757

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide
access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg work in a format
other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official
version posted on the official Project Gutenberg website
(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of
obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain
Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the
full Project Gutenberg License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg electronic works provided
that:

• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from the
use of Project Gutenberg works calculated using the method you
already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the
owner of the Project Gutenberg trademark, but he has agreed to donate
royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days
following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to
prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly
marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information about
donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”

• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does
not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You
must require such a user to return or destroy all copies of the works

Page 758

possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use of and all
access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.

• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
receipt of the work.

• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free distribution
of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™
electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth
in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of the
Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in
Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend
considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and
proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the
Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may be
stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete,
inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES -
Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in
paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation,
the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party
distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this
agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and

Page 759

expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO
REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH
OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE
FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY
DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT,
CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES
EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you
discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it,
you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by
sending a written explanation to the person you received the work
from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must return
the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity that
provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a
replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work
electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to
give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu
of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a
refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If
any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law
of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by

Page 760

the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the
Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the
Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any
volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution
of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability,
costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly
from any of the following which you do or cause to occur: (a)
distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg work, (b) alteration,
modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg work,
and (c) any Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project
Gutenberg

Project Gutenberg is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg’s goals
and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg collection will remain freely
available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure and
permanent future for Project Gutenberg and future generations. To
learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and
the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation

Page 761

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the state
of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue
Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification number is
64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S.
federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 41 Watchung Plaza
#516, Montclair NJ 07042, USA, +1 (862) 621-9288. Email contact
links and up to date contact information can be found at the
Foundation’s website and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small
donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax
exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United States.
Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a considerable
effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up with these
requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where we have
not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition

Page 762

against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg
electronic works

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg
concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project
Gutenberg eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search facility:
www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg, including
how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.

Page 763

PDF language

简体中文 https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=8b30531824392f2279f1df52f5f74b0f&bl=zh Translating…
Español https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=8b30531824392f2279f1df52f5f74b0f&bl=es Translating…
Français https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=8b30531824392f2279f1df52f5f74b0f&bl=fr Translating…
Deutsch https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=8b30531824392f2279f1df52f5f74b0f&bl=de Translating…
日本語 https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=8b30531824392f2279f1df52f5f74b0f&bl=ja Translating…
한국어 https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=8b30531824392f2279f1df52f5f74b0f&bl=ko Translating…
Português https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=8b30531824392f2279f1df52f5f74b0f&bl=pt Translating…
Русский https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=8b30531824392f2279f1df52f5f74b0f&bl=ru Translating…
العربية https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=8b30531824392f2279f1df52f5f74b0f&bl=ar Translating…