Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
The Project Gutenberg eBook of My Life — Volume 1
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of
the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will
have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using
this eBook.
Title: My Life — Volume 1
Author: Richard Wagner
Release date: February 1, 2004 [eBook #5197]
Most recently updated: May 28, 2026
Language: English
Other information and formats: www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/5197
Credits: John Mamoun, Charles Franks and the Online distributed
proofreading website
*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK MY LIFE —
VOLUME 1 ***
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of
the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will
have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using
this eBook.
Title: My Life — Volume 1
Author: Richard Wagner
Release date: February 1, 2004 [eBook #5197]
Most recently updated: May 28, 2026
Language: English
Other information and formats: www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/5197
Credits: John Mamoun, Charles Franks and the Online distributed
proofreading website
*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK MY LIFE —
VOLUME 1 ***
Page 4
My Life
by Richard Wagner
IN TWO VOLUMES
Volume 1
AUTHORIZED TRANSLATION FROM THE GERMAN
by Richard Wagner
IN TWO VOLUMES
Volume 1
AUTHORIZED TRANSLATION FROM THE GERMAN
Page 5
Contents
PREFACE
CONTENTS
MY LIFE
PART I. 1813-1842
PART II. 1842-1850 (Dresden)
PREFACE
CONTENTS
MY LIFE
PART I. 1813-1842
PART II. 1842-1850 (Dresden)
Page 6
PREFACE
The contents of these volumes have been written down directly from my
dictation, over a period of several years, by my friend and wife, who wished
me to tell her the story of my life. It was the desire of both of us that these
details of my life should be accessible to our family and to our sincere and
trusted friends; and we decided therefore, in order to provide against a
possible destruction of the one manuscript, to have a small number of
copies printed at our own expense. As the value of this autobiography
consists in its unadorned veracity, which, under the circumstances, is its
only justification, therefore my statements had to be accompanied by
precise names and dates; hence there could be no question of their
publication until some time after my death, should interest in them still
survive in our descendants, and on that point I intend leaving directions in
my will.
If, on the other hand, we do not refuse certain intimate friends a sight of
these papers now, it is that, relying on their genuine interest in the contents,
we are confident that they will not pass on their knowledge to any who do
not share their feelings in the matter.
Richard Wagner
The contents of these volumes have been written down directly from my
dictation, over a period of several years, by my friend and wife, who wished
me to tell her the story of my life. It was the desire of both of us that these
details of my life should be accessible to our family and to our sincere and
trusted friends; and we decided therefore, in order to provide against a
possible destruction of the one manuscript, to have a small number of
copies printed at our own expense. As the value of this autobiography
consists in its unadorned veracity, which, under the circumstances, is its
only justification, therefore my statements had to be accompanied by
precise names and dates; hence there could be no question of their
publication until some time after my death, should interest in them still
survive in our descendants, and on that point I intend leaving directions in
my will.
If, on the other hand, we do not refuse certain intimate friends a sight of
these papers now, it is that, relying on their genuine interest in the contents,
we are confident that they will not pass on their knowledge to any who do
not share their feelings in the matter.
Richard Wagner
Page 7
CONTENTS
Part I. 1813-1842
Childhood and Schooldays
Musical Studies
Travels in Germany (First Marriage)
Paris: 1839-42
Part II. 1842-1850 (Dresden)
‘Rienzi’
‘The Flying Dutchman’
Liszt, Spontini, Marschner, etc.
‘Tannhäuser’
Franck, Schumann, Semper, Gutzkow, Auerbach
‘Lohengrin’ (Libretto)
Ninth Symphony
Spohr, Gluck, Hiller, Devrient
Official Position.
Studies in Historical Literature
‘Rienzi’ at Berlin
Relations with the Management, Mother’s Death, etc.
Growing Sympathy with Political Events, Bakunin
The May Insurrection
Flight: Weimar, Zürich, Paris, Bordeaux, Geneva, Zürich
Part I. 1813-1842
Childhood and Schooldays
Musical Studies
Travels in Germany (First Marriage)
Paris: 1839-42
Part II. 1842-1850 (Dresden)
‘Rienzi’
‘The Flying Dutchman’
Liszt, Spontini, Marschner, etc.
‘Tannhäuser’
Franck, Schumann, Semper, Gutzkow, Auerbach
‘Lohengrin’ (Libretto)
Ninth Symphony
Spohr, Gluck, Hiller, Devrient
Official Position.
Studies in Historical Literature
‘Rienzi’ at Berlin
Relations with the Management, Mother’s Death, etc.
Growing Sympathy with Political Events, Bakunin
The May Insurrection
Flight: Weimar, Zürich, Paris, Bordeaux, Geneva, Zürich
Page 8
ILLUSTRATIONS
FRONTISPIECE FOR VOLUME I
Richard Wagner in 1842,
from the Portrait by E. Kietz.
FRONTISPIECE FOR VOLUME II
Richard Wagner about 1872 by Lenbach.
FRONTISPIECE FOR VOLUME I
Richard Wagner in 1842,
from the Portrait by E. Kietz.
FRONTISPIECE FOR VOLUME II
Richard Wagner about 1872 by Lenbach.
Page 9
Original in the possession of Frau Cosima Wagner These frontispieces
are used by the courtesy of Mr. F. Bruckmann.
are used by the courtesy of Mr. F. Bruckmann.
Page 10
MY LIFE
Page 11
PART I
1813-1842
I was born at Leipzig on the 22nd of May 1813, in a room on the second
floor of the ‘Red and White Lion,’ and two days later was baptized at St.
Thomas’s Church, and christened Wilhelm Richard.
My father, Friedrich Wagner, was at the time of my birth a clerk in the
police service at Leipzig, and hoped to get the post of Chief Constable in
that town, but he died in the October of that same year. His death was partly
due to the great exertions imposed upon him by the stress of police work
during the war troubles and the battle of Leipzig, and partly to the fact that
he fell a victim to the nervous fever which was raging at that time. As
regards his father’s position in life, I learnt later that he had held a small
civil appointment as toll collector at the Ranstädt Gate, but had
distinguished himself from those in the same station by giving his two sons
a superior education, my father, Friedrich, studying law, and the younger
son, Adolph, theology.
My uncle subsequently exercised no small influence on my development;
we shall meet him again at a critical turning-point in the story of my youth.
My father, whom I had lost so early, was, as I discovered afterwards, a
great lover of poetry and literature in general, and possessed in particular an
almost passionate affection for the drama, which was at that time much in
vogue among the educated classes. My mother told me, among other things,
that he took her to Lauchstadt for the first performance of the Braut von
Messina, and that on the promenade he pointed out Schiller and Goethe to
her, and reproved her warmly for never having heard of these great men. He
is said to have been not altogether free from a gallant interest in actresses.
My mother used to complain jokingly that she often had to keep lunch
waiting for him while he was paying court to a certain famous actress of the
day.[1] When she scolded him, he vowed that he had been delayed by papers
1813-1842
I was born at Leipzig on the 22nd of May 1813, in a room on the second
floor of the ‘Red and White Lion,’ and two days later was baptized at St.
Thomas’s Church, and christened Wilhelm Richard.
My father, Friedrich Wagner, was at the time of my birth a clerk in the
police service at Leipzig, and hoped to get the post of Chief Constable in
that town, but he died in the October of that same year. His death was partly
due to the great exertions imposed upon him by the stress of police work
during the war troubles and the battle of Leipzig, and partly to the fact that
he fell a victim to the nervous fever which was raging at that time. As
regards his father’s position in life, I learnt later that he had held a small
civil appointment as toll collector at the Ranstädt Gate, but had
distinguished himself from those in the same station by giving his two sons
a superior education, my father, Friedrich, studying law, and the younger
son, Adolph, theology.
My uncle subsequently exercised no small influence on my development;
we shall meet him again at a critical turning-point in the story of my youth.
My father, whom I had lost so early, was, as I discovered afterwards, a
great lover of poetry and literature in general, and possessed in particular an
almost passionate affection for the drama, which was at that time much in
vogue among the educated classes. My mother told me, among other things,
that he took her to Lauchstadt for the first performance of the Braut von
Messina, and that on the promenade he pointed out Schiller and Goethe to
her, and reproved her warmly for never having heard of these great men. He
is said to have been not altogether free from a gallant interest in actresses.
My mother used to complain jokingly that she often had to keep lunch
waiting for him while he was paying court to a certain famous actress of the
day.[1] When she scolded him, he vowed that he had been delayed by papers
Page 12
that had to be attended to, and as a proof of his assertion pointed to his
fingers, which were supposed to be stained with ink, but on closer
inspection were found to be quite clean. His great fondness for the theatre
was further shown by his choice of the actor, Ludwig Geyer, as one of his
intimate friends. Although his choice of this friend was no doubt mainly due
to his love for the theatre, he at the same time introduced into his family the
noblest of benefactors; for this modest artist, prompted by a warm interest
in the lot of his friend’s large family, so unexpectedly left destitute, devoted
the remainder of his life to making strenuous efforts to maintain and
educate the orphans. Even when the police official was spending his
evenings at the theatre, the worthy actor generally filled his place in the
family circle, and it seems had frequently to appease my mother, who,
rightly or wrongly, complained of the frivolity of her husband.
[1] Madame Hartwig.
How deeply the homeless artist, hard pressed by life and tossed to and
fro, longed to feel himself at home in a sympathetic family circle, was
proved by the fact that a year after his friend’s death he married his widow,
and from that time forward became a most loving father to the seven
children that had been left behind.
In this onerous undertaking he was favoured by an unexpected
improvement in his position, for he obtained a remunerative, respectable,
and permanent engagement, as a character actor, at the newly established
Court Theatre in Dresden. His talent for painting, which had already helped
him to earn a livelihood when forced by extreme poverty to break off his
university studies, again stood him in good stead in his position at Dresden.
True, he complained even more than his critics that he had been kept from a
regular and systematic study of this art, yet his extraordinary aptitude, for
portrait painting in particular, secured him such important commissions that
he unfortunately exhausted his strength prematurely by his twofold
exertions as painter and actor. Once, when he was invited to Munich to
fulfil a temporary engagement at the Court Theatre, he received, through
the distinguished recommendation of the Saxon Court, such pressing
commissions from the Bavarian Court for portraits of the royal family that
he thought it wise to cancel his contract altogether. He also had a turn for
poetry. Besides fragments—often in very dainty verse—he wrote several
comedies, one of which, Der Bethlehemitische Kindermord, in rhymed
fingers, which were supposed to be stained with ink, but on closer
inspection were found to be quite clean. His great fondness for the theatre
was further shown by his choice of the actor, Ludwig Geyer, as one of his
intimate friends. Although his choice of this friend was no doubt mainly due
to his love for the theatre, he at the same time introduced into his family the
noblest of benefactors; for this modest artist, prompted by a warm interest
in the lot of his friend’s large family, so unexpectedly left destitute, devoted
the remainder of his life to making strenuous efforts to maintain and
educate the orphans. Even when the police official was spending his
evenings at the theatre, the worthy actor generally filled his place in the
family circle, and it seems had frequently to appease my mother, who,
rightly or wrongly, complained of the frivolity of her husband.
[1] Madame Hartwig.
How deeply the homeless artist, hard pressed by life and tossed to and
fro, longed to feel himself at home in a sympathetic family circle, was
proved by the fact that a year after his friend’s death he married his widow,
and from that time forward became a most loving father to the seven
children that had been left behind.
In this onerous undertaking he was favoured by an unexpected
improvement in his position, for he obtained a remunerative, respectable,
and permanent engagement, as a character actor, at the newly established
Court Theatre in Dresden. His talent for painting, which had already helped
him to earn a livelihood when forced by extreme poverty to break off his
university studies, again stood him in good stead in his position at Dresden.
True, he complained even more than his critics that he had been kept from a
regular and systematic study of this art, yet his extraordinary aptitude, for
portrait painting in particular, secured him such important commissions that
he unfortunately exhausted his strength prematurely by his twofold
exertions as painter and actor. Once, when he was invited to Munich to
fulfil a temporary engagement at the Court Theatre, he received, through
the distinguished recommendation of the Saxon Court, such pressing
commissions from the Bavarian Court for portraits of the royal family that
he thought it wise to cancel his contract altogether. He also had a turn for
poetry. Besides fragments—often in very dainty verse—he wrote several
comedies, one of which, Der Bethlehemitische Kindermord, in rhymed
Page 13
Alexandrines, was often performed; it was published and received the
warmest praise from Goethe.
This excellent man, under whose care our family moved to Dresden
when I was two years old, and by whom my mother had another daughter,
Cecilia, now also took my education in hand with the greatest care and
affection. He wished to adopt me altogether, and accordingly, when I was
sent to my first school, he gave me his own name, so that till the age of
fourteen I was known to my Dresden schoolfellows as Richard Geyer; and
it was not until some years after my stepfather’s death, and on my family’s
return to Leipzig, the home of my own kith and kin, that I resumed the
name of Wagner.
The earliest recollections of my childhood are associated with my
stepfather, and passed from him to the theatre. I well remember that he
would have liked to see me develop a talent for painting; and his studio,
with the easel and the pictures upon it, did not fail to impress me. I
remember in particular that I tried, with a childish love of imitation, to copy
a portrait of King Frederick Augustus of Saxony; but when this simple
daubing had to give place to a serious study of drawing, I could not stand it,
possibly because I was discouraged by the pedantic technique of my
teacher, a cousin of mine, who was rather a bore. At one time during my
early boyhood I became so weak after some childish ailment that my
mother told me later she used almost to wish me dead, for it seemed as
though I should never get well. However, my subsequent good health
apparently astonished my parents. I afterwards learnt the noble part played
by my excellent stepfather on this occasion also; he never gave way to
despair, in spite of the cares and troubles of so large a family, but remained
patient throughout, and never lost the hope of pulling me through safely.
My imagination at this time was deeply impressed by my acquaintance
with the theatre, with which I was brought into contact, not only as a
childish spectator from the mysterious stagebox, with its access to the stage,
and by visits to the wardrobe with its fantastic costumes, wigs and other
disguises, but also by taking a part in the performances myself. After I had
been filled with fear by seeing my father play the villain’s part in such
tragedies as Die Waise und der Mörder, Die beiden Galeerensklaven, I
occasionally took part in comedy. I remember that I appeared in Der
Weinberg an der Elbe, a piece specially written to welcome the King of
warmest praise from Goethe.
This excellent man, under whose care our family moved to Dresden
when I was two years old, and by whom my mother had another daughter,
Cecilia, now also took my education in hand with the greatest care and
affection. He wished to adopt me altogether, and accordingly, when I was
sent to my first school, he gave me his own name, so that till the age of
fourteen I was known to my Dresden schoolfellows as Richard Geyer; and
it was not until some years after my stepfather’s death, and on my family’s
return to Leipzig, the home of my own kith and kin, that I resumed the
name of Wagner.
The earliest recollections of my childhood are associated with my
stepfather, and passed from him to the theatre. I well remember that he
would have liked to see me develop a talent for painting; and his studio,
with the easel and the pictures upon it, did not fail to impress me. I
remember in particular that I tried, with a childish love of imitation, to copy
a portrait of King Frederick Augustus of Saxony; but when this simple
daubing had to give place to a serious study of drawing, I could not stand it,
possibly because I was discouraged by the pedantic technique of my
teacher, a cousin of mine, who was rather a bore. At one time during my
early boyhood I became so weak after some childish ailment that my
mother told me later she used almost to wish me dead, for it seemed as
though I should never get well. However, my subsequent good health
apparently astonished my parents. I afterwards learnt the noble part played
by my excellent stepfather on this occasion also; he never gave way to
despair, in spite of the cares and troubles of so large a family, but remained
patient throughout, and never lost the hope of pulling me through safely.
My imagination at this time was deeply impressed by my acquaintance
with the theatre, with which I was brought into contact, not only as a
childish spectator from the mysterious stagebox, with its access to the stage,
and by visits to the wardrobe with its fantastic costumes, wigs and other
disguises, but also by taking a part in the performances myself. After I had
been filled with fear by seeing my father play the villain’s part in such
tragedies as Die Waise und der Mörder, Die beiden Galeerensklaven, I
occasionally took part in comedy. I remember that I appeared in Der
Weinberg an der Elbe, a piece specially written to welcome the King of
Page 14
Saxony on his return from captivity, with music by the conductor, C. M.
von Weber. In this I figured in a tableau vivant as an angel, sewn up in
tights with wings on my back, in a graceful pose which I had laboriously
practised. I also remember on this occasion being given a big iced cake,
which I was assured the King had intended for me personally. Lastly, I can
recall taking a child’s part in which I had a few words to speak in
Kotzebue’s Menschenhass und Reue[2], which furnished me with an excuse
at school for not having learnt my lessons. I said I had too much to do, as I
had to learn by heart an important part in Den Menschen ausser der Reihe.[3]
[2] ‘Misanthropy and Remorse.’
[3] ‘The Man out of the Rank or Row.’ In the German this is a simple phonetic
corruption of Kotzebue’s title, which might easily occur to a child who had only
heard, and not read, that title.—EDITOR.
On the other hand, to show how seriously my father regarded my
education, when I was six years old he took me to a clergyman in the
country at Possendorf, near Dresden, where I was to be given a sound and
healthy training with other boys of my own class. In the evening, the vicar,
whose name was Wetzel, used to tell us the story of Robinson Crusoe, and
discuss it with us in a highly instructive manner. I was, moreover, much
impressed by a biography of Mozart which was read aloud; and the
newspaper accounts and monthly reports of the events of the Greek War of
Independence stirred my imagination deeply. My love for Greece, which
afterwards made me turn with enthusiasm to the mythology and history of
ancient Hellas, was thus the natural outcome of the intense and painful
interest I took in the events of this period. In after years the story of the
struggle of the Greeks against the Persians always revived my impressions
of this modern revolt of Greece against the Turks.
One day, when I had been in this country home scarcely a year, a
messenger came from town to ask the vicar to take me to my parents’ house
in Dresden, as my father was dying.
We did the three hours’ journey on foot; and as I was very exhausted
when I arrived, I scarcely understood why my mother was crying. The next
day I was taken to my father’s bedside; the extreme weakness with which
he spoke to me, combined with all the precautions taken in the last
desperate treatment of his complaint—acute hydrothorax—made the whole
von Weber. In this I figured in a tableau vivant as an angel, sewn up in
tights with wings on my back, in a graceful pose which I had laboriously
practised. I also remember on this occasion being given a big iced cake,
which I was assured the King had intended for me personally. Lastly, I can
recall taking a child’s part in which I had a few words to speak in
Kotzebue’s Menschenhass und Reue[2], which furnished me with an excuse
at school for not having learnt my lessons. I said I had too much to do, as I
had to learn by heart an important part in Den Menschen ausser der Reihe.[3]
[2] ‘Misanthropy and Remorse.’
[3] ‘The Man out of the Rank or Row.’ In the German this is a simple phonetic
corruption of Kotzebue’s title, which might easily occur to a child who had only
heard, and not read, that title.—EDITOR.
On the other hand, to show how seriously my father regarded my
education, when I was six years old he took me to a clergyman in the
country at Possendorf, near Dresden, where I was to be given a sound and
healthy training with other boys of my own class. In the evening, the vicar,
whose name was Wetzel, used to tell us the story of Robinson Crusoe, and
discuss it with us in a highly instructive manner. I was, moreover, much
impressed by a biography of Mozart which was read aloud; and the
newspaper accounts and monthly reports of the events of the Greek War of
Independence stirred my imagination deeply. My love for Greece, which
afterwards made me turn with enthusiasm to the mythology and history of
ancient Hellas, was thus the natural outcome of the intense and painful
interest I took in the events of this period. In after years the story of the
struggle of the Greeks against the Persians always revived my impressions
of this modern revolt of Greece against the Turks.
One day, when I had been in this country home scarcely a year, a
messenger came from town to ask the vicar to take me to my parents’ house
in Dresden, as my father was dying.
We did the three hours’ journey on foot; and as I was very exhausted
when I arrived, I scarcely understood why my mother was crying. The next
day I was taken to my father’s bedside; the extreme weakness with which
he spoke to me, combined with all the precautions taken in the last
desperate treatment of his complaint—acute hydrothorax—made the whole
Page 15
scene appear like a dream to me, and I think I was too frightened and
surprised to cry.
In the next room my mother asked me to show her what I could play on
the piano, wisely hoping to divert my father’s thoughts by the sound. I
played Ueb’ immer Treu und Redlichkeit, and my father said to her, ‘Is it
possible he has musical talent?’
In the early hours of the next morning my mother came into the great
night nursery, and, standing by the bedside of each of us in turn, told us,
with sobs, that our father was dead, and gave us each a message with his
blessing. To me she said, ‘He hoped to make something of you.’
In the afternoon my schoolmaster, Wetzel, came to take me back to the
country. We walked the whole way to Possendorf, arriving at nightfall. On
the way I asked him many questions about the stars, of which he gave me
my first intelligent idea.
A week later my stepfather’s brother arrived from Eisleben for the
funeral. He promised, as far as he was able, to support the family, which
was now once more destitute, and undertook to provide for my future
education.
I took leave of my companions and of the kind-hearted clergyman, and it
was for his funeral that I paid my next visit to Possendorf a few years later.
I did not go to the place again till long afterwards, when I visited it on an
excursion such as I often made, far into the country, at the time when I was
conducting the orchestra in Dresden. I was much grieved not to find the old
parsonage still there, but in its place a more pretentious modern structure,
which so turned me against the locality, that thenceforward my excursions
were always made in another direction.
This time my uncle brought me back to Dresden in the carriage. I found
my mother and sister in the deepest mourning, and remember being
received for the first time with a tenderness not usual in our family; and I
noticed that the same tenderness marked our leave-taking, when, a few days
later, my uncle took me with him to Eisleben.
This uncle, who was a younger brother of my stepfather, had settled there
as a goldsmith, and Julius, one of my elder brothers, had already been
apprenticed to him. Our old grandmother also lived with this bachelor son,
and as it was evident that she could not live long, she was not informed of
the death of her eldest son, which I, too, was bidden to keep to myself. The
surprised to cry.
In the next room my mother asked me to show her what I could play on
the piano, wisely hoping to divert my father’s thoughts by the sound. I
played Ueb’ immer Treu und Redlichkeit, and my father said to her, ‘Is it
possible he has musical talent?’
In the early hours of the next morning my mother came into the great
night nursery, and, standing by the bedside of each of us in turn, told us,
with sobs, that our father was dead, and gave us each a message with his
blessing. To me she said, ‘He hoped to make something of you.’
In the afternoon my schoolmaster, Wetzel, came to take me back to the
country. We walked the whole way to Possendorf, arriving at nightfall. On
the way I asked him many questions about the stars, of which he gave me
my first intelligent idea.
A week later my stepfather’s brother arrived from Eisleben for the
funeral. He promised, as far as he was able, to support the family, which
was now once more destitute, and undertook to provide for my future
education.
I took leave of my companions and of the kind-hearted clergyman, and it
was for his funeral that I paid my next visit to Possendorf a few years later.
I did not go to the place again till long afterwards, when I visited it on an
excursion such as I often made, far into the country, at the time when I was
conducting the orchestra in Dresden. I was much grieved not to find the old
parsonage still there, but in its place a more pretentious modern structure,
which so turned me against the locality, that thenceforward my excursions
were always made in another direction.
This time my uncle brought me back to Dresden in the carriage. I found
my mother and sister in the deepest mourning, and remember being
received for the first time with a tenderness not usual in our family; and I
noticed that the same tenderness marked our leave-taking, when, a few days
later, my uncle took me with him to Eisleben.
This uncle, who was a younger brother of my stepfather, had settled there
as a goldsmith, and Julius, one of my elder brothers, had already been
apprenticed to him. Our old grandmother also lived with this bachelor son,
and as it was evident that she could not live long, she was not informed of
the death of her eldest son, which I, too, was bidden to keep to myself. The
Page 16
servant carefully removed the crape from my coat, telling me she would
keep it until my grandmother died, which was likely to be soon.
I was now often called upon to tell her about my father, and it was no
great difficulty for me to keep the secret of his death, as I had scarcely
realised it myself. She lived in a dark back room looking out upon a narrow
courtyard, and took a great delight in watching the robins that fluttered
freely about her, and for which she always kept fresh green boughs by the
stove. When some of these robins were killed by the cat, I managed to catch
others for her in the neighbourhood, which pleased her very much, and, in
return, she kept me tidy and clean. Her death, as had been expected, took
place before long, and the crape that had been put away was now openly
worn in Eisleben.
The back room, with its robins and green branches, now knew me no
more, but I soon made myself at home with a soap-boiler’s family, to whom
the house belonged, and became popular with them on account of the
stories I told them.
I was sent to a private school kept by a man called Weiss, who left an
impression of gravity and dignity upon my mind.
Towards the end of the fifties I was greatly moved at reading in a musical
paper the account of a concert at Eisleben, consisting of parts of
Tannhäuser, at which my former master, who had not forgotten his young
pupil, had been present.
The little old town with Luther’s house, and the numberless memorials it
contained of his stay there, has often, in later days, come back to me in
dreams. I have always wished to revisit it and verify the clearness of my
recollections, but, strange to say, it has never been my fate to do so. We
lived in the market-place, where I was often entertained by strange sights,
such, for instance, as performances by a troupe of acrobats, in which a man
walked a rope stretched from tower to tower across the square, an
achievement which long inspired me with a passion for such feats of daring.
Indeed, I got so far as to walk a rope fairly easily myself with the help of a
balancing-pole. I had made the rope out of cords twisted together and
stretched across the courtyard, and even now I still feel a desire to gratify
my acrobatic instincts. The thing that attracted me most, however, was the
brass band of a Hussar regiment quartered at Eisleben. It often played a
certain piece which had just come out, and which was making a great
keep it until my grandmother died, which was likely to be soon.
I was now often called upon to tell her about my father, and it was no
great difficulty for me to keep the secret of his death, as I had scarcely
realised it myself. She lived in a dark back room looking out upon a narrow
courtyard, and took a great delight in watching the robins that fluttered
freely about her, and for which she always kept fresh green boughs by the
stove. When some of these robins were killed by the cat, I managed to catch
others for her in the neighbourhood, which pleased her very much, and, in
return, she kept me tidy and clean. Her death, as had been expected, took
place before long, and the crape that had been put away was now openly
worn in Eisleben.
The back room, with its robins and green branches, now knew me no
more, but I soon made myself at home with a soap-boiler’s family, to whom
the house belonged, and became popular with them on account of the
stories I told them.
I was sent to a private school kept by a man called Weiss, who left an
impression of gravity and dignity upon my mind.
Towards the end of the fifties I was greatly moved at reading in a musical
paper the account of a concert at Eisleben, consisting of parts of
Tannhäuser, at which my former master, who had not forgotten his young
pupil, had been present.
The little old town with Luther’s house, and the numberless memorials it
contained of his stay there, has often, in later days, come back to me in
dreams. I have always wished to revisit it and verify the clearness of my
recollections, but, strange to say, it has never been my fate to do so. We
lived in the market-place, where I was often entertained by strange sights,
such, for instance, as performances by a troupe of acrobats, in which a man
walked a rope stretched from tower to tower across the square, an
achievement which long inspired me with a passion for such feats of daring.
Indeed, I got so far as to walk a rope fairly easily myself with the help of a
balancing-pole. I had made the rope out of cords twisted together and
stretched across the courtyard, and even now I still feel a desire to gratify
my acrobatic instincts. The thing that attracted me most, however, was the
brass band of a Hussar regiment quartered at Eisleben. It often played a
certain piece which had just come out, and which was making a great
Page 17
sensation, I mean the ‘Huntsmen’s Chorus’ out of the Freischutz, that had
been recently performed at the Opera in Berlin. My uncle and brother asked
me eagerly about its composer, Weber, whom I must have seen at my
parents’ house in Dresden, when he was conductor of the orchestra there.
About the same time the Jungfernkranz was zealously played and sung
by some friends who lived near us. These two pieces cured me of my
weakness for the ‘Ypsilanti’ Waltz, which till that time I had regarded as the
most wonderful of compositions.
I have recollections of frequent tussles with the town boys, who were
constantly mocking at me for my ‘square’ cap; and I remember, too, that I
was very fond of rambles of adventure among the rocky banks of the
Unstrut.
My uncle’s marriage late in life, and the starting of his new home,
brought about a marked alteration in his relations to my family.
After a lapse of a year I was taken by him to Leipzig, and handed over
for some days to the Wagners, my own father’s relatives, consisting of my
uncle Adolph and his sister Friederike Wagner. This extraordinarily
interesting man, whose influence afterwards became ever more stimulating
to me, now for the first time brought himself and his singular environment
into my life.
He and my aunt were very close friends of Jeannette Thome, a queer old
maid who shared with them a large house in the market-place, in which, if I
am not mistaken, the Electoral family of Saxony had, ever since the days of
Augustus the Strong, hired and furnished the two principal storeys for their
own use whenever they were in Leipzig.
So far as I know, Jeannette Thome really owned the second storey, of
which she inhabited only a modest apartment looking out on the courtyard.
As, however, the King merely occupied the hired rooms for a few days in
the year, Jeannette and her circle generally made use of his splendid
apartments, and one of these staterooms was made into a bedroom for me.
The decorations and fittings of these rooms also dated from the days of
Augustus the Strong. They were luxurious with heavy silk and rich rococo
furniture, all of which were much soiled with age. As a matter of fact, I was
delighted by these large strange rooms, looking out upon the bustling
Leipzig market-place, where I loved above all to watch the students in the
been recently performed at the Opera in Berlin. My uncle and brother asked
me eagerly about its composer, Weber, whom I must have seen at my
parents’ house in Dresden, when he was conductor of the orchestra there.
About the same time the Jungfernkranz was zealously played and sung
by some friends who lived near us. These two pieces cured me of my
weakness for the ‘Ypsilanti’ Waltz, which till that time I had regarded as the
most wonderful of compositions.
I have recollections of frequent tussles with the town boys, who were
constantly mocking at me for my ‘square’ cap; and I remember, too, that I
was very fond of rambles of adventure among the rocky banks of the
Unstrut.
My uncle’s marriage late in life, and the starting of his new home,
brought about a marked alteration in his relations to my family.
After a lapse of a year I was taken by him to Leipzig, and handed over
for some days to the Wagners, my own father’s relatives, consisting of my
uncle Adolph and his sister Friederike Wagner. This extraordinarily
interesting man, whose influence afterwards became ever more stimulating
to me, now for the first time brought himself and his singular environment
into my life.
He and my aunt were very close friends of Jeannette Thome, a queer old
maid who shared with them a large house in the market-place, in which, if I
am not mistaken, the Electoral family of Saxony had, ever since the days of
Augustus the Strong, hired and furnished the two principal storeys for their
own use whenever they were in Leipzig.
So far as I know, Jeannette Thome really owned the second storey, of
which she inhabited only a modest apartment looking out on the courtyard.
As, however, the King merely occupied the hired rooms for a few days in
the year, Jeannette and her circle generally made use of his splendid
apartments, and one of these staterooms was made into a bedroom for me.
The decorations and fittings of these rooms also dated from the days of
Augustus the Strong. They were luxurious with heavy silk and rich rococo
furniture, all of which were much soiled with age. As a matter of fact, I was
delighted by these large strange rooms, looking out upon the bustling
Leipzig market-place, where I loved above all to watch the students in the
Page 18
crowd making their way along in their old-fashioned ‘Club’ attire, and
filling up the whole width of the street.
There was only one portion of the decorations of the rooms that I
thoroughly disliked, and this consisted of the various portraits, but
particularly those of high-born dames in hooped petticoats, with youthful
faces and powdered hair. These appeared to me exactly like ghosts, who,
when I was alone in the room, seemed to come back to life, and filled me
with the most abject fear. To sleep alone in this distant chamber, in that old-
fashioned bed of state, beneath those unearthly pictures, was a constant
terror to me. It is true I tried to hide my fear from my aunt when she lighted
me to bed in the evening with her candle, but never a night passed in which
I was not a prey to the most horrible ghostly visions, my dread of which
would leave me in a bath of perspiration.
The personality of the three chief occupants of this storey was admirably
adapted to materialise the ghostly impressions of the house into a reality
that resembled some strange fairy-tale.
Jeannette Thome was very small and stout; she wore a fair Titus wig, and
seemed to hug to herself the consciousness of vanished beauty. My aunt,
her faithful friend and guardian, who was also an old maid, was remarkable
for the height and extreme leanness of her person. The oddity of her
otherwise very pleasant face was increased by an exceedingly pointed chin.
My uncle Adolph had chosen as his permanent study a dark room in the
courtyard. There it was that I saw him for the first time, surrounded by a
great wilderness of books, and attired in an unpretentious indoor costume,
the most striking feature of which was a tall, pointed felt cap, such as I had
seen worn by the clown who belonged to the troupe of rope-dancers at
Eisleben. A great love of independence had driven him to this strange
retreat. He had been originally destined for the Church, but he soon gave
that up, in order to devote himself entirely to philological studies. But as he
had the greatest dislike of acting as a professor and teacher in a regular post,
he soon tried to make a meagre livelihood by literary work. He had certain
social gifts, and especially a fine tenor voice, and appears in his youth to
have been welcome as a man of letters among a fairly wide circle of friends
at Leipzig.
On a trip to Jena, during which he and a companion seem to have found
their way into various musical and oratorical associations, he paid a visit to
filling up the whole width of the street.
There was only one portion of the decorations of the rooms that I
thoroughly disliked, and this consisted of the various portraits, but
particularly those of high-born dames in hooped petticoats, with youthful
faces and powdered hair. These appeared to me exactly like ghosts, who,
when I was alone in the room, seemed to come back to life, and filled me
with the most abject fear. To sleep alone in this distant chamber, in that old-
fashioned bed of state, beneath those unearthly pictures, was a constant
terror to me. It is true I tried to hide my fear from my aunt when she lighted
me to bed in the evening with her candle, but never a night passed in which
I was not a prey to the most horrible ghostly visions, my dread of which
would leave me in a bath of perspiration.
The personality of the three chief occupants of this storey was admirably
adapted to materialise the ghostly impressions of the house into a reality
that resembled some strange fairy-tale.
Jeannette Thome was very small and stout; she wore a fair Titus wig, and
seemed to hug to herself the consciousness of vanished beauty. My aunt,
her faithful friend and guardian, who was also an old maid, was remarkable
for the height and extreme leanness of her person. The oddity of her
otherwise very pleasant face was increased by an exceedingly pointed chin.
My uncle Adolph had chosen as his permanent study a dark room in the
courtyard. There it was that I saw him for the first time, surrounded by a
great wilderness of books, and attired in an unpretentious indoor costume,
the most striking feature of which was a tall, pointed felt cap, such as I had
seen worn by the clown who belonged to the troupe of rope-dancers at
Eisleben. A great love of independence had driven him to this strange
retreat. He had been originally destined for the Church, but he soon gave
that up, in order to devote himself entirely to philological studies. But as he
had the greatest dislike of acting as a professor and teacher in a regular post,
he soon tried to make a meagre livelihood by literary work. He had certain
social gifts, and especially a fine tenor voice, and appears in his youth to
have been welcome as a man of letters among a fairly wide circle of friends
at Leipzig.
On a trip to Jena, during which he and a companion seem to have found
their way into various musical and oratorical associations, he paid a visit to
Page 19
Schiller. With this object in view, he had come armed with a request from
the management of the Leipzig Theatre, who wanted to secure the rights of
Wallenstein, which was just finished. He told me later of the magic
impression made upon him by Schiller, with his tall slight figure and
irresistibly attractive blue eyes. His only complaint was that, owing to a
well-meant trick played on him by his friend, he had been placed in a most
trying position; for the latter had managed to send Schiller a small volume
of Adolph Wagner’s poems in advance.
The young poet was much embarrassed to hear Schiller address him in
flattering terms on the subject of his poetry, but was convinced that the
great man was merely encouraging him out of kindness. Afterwards he
devoted himself entirely to philological studios—one of his best-known
publications in that department being his Parnasso Italiano, which he
dedicated to Goethe in an Italian poem. True, I have heard experts say that
the latter was written in unusually pompous Italian; but Goethe sent him a
letter full of praise, as well as a silver cup from his own household plate.
The impression that I, as a boy of eight, conceived of Adolph Wagner, amid
the surroundings of his own home, was that he was a peculiarly puzzling
character.
I soon had to leave the influence of this environment and was brought
back to my people at Dresden. Meanwhile my family, under the guidance of
my bereaved mother, had been obliged to settle down as well as they could
under the circumstances. My eldest brother Albert, who originally intended
to study medicine, had, upon the advice of Weber, who had much admired
his beautiful tenor voice, started his theatrical career in Breslau. My second
sister Louisa soon followed his example, and became an actress. My eldest
sister Rosalie had obtained an excellent engagement at the Dresden Court
Theatre, and the younger members of the family all looked up to her; for
she was now the main support of our poor sorrowing mother. My family
still occupied the same comfortable home which my father had made for
them. Some of the spare rooms were occasionally let to strangers, and
Spohr was among those who at one time lodged with us. Thanks to her
great energy, and to help received from various sources (among which the
continued generosity of the Court, out of respect to the memory of my late
stepfather, must not be forgotten), my mother managed so well in making
both ends meet, that even my education did not suffer.
the management of the Leipzig Theatre, who wanted to secure the rights of
Wallenstein, which was just finished. He told me later of the magic
impression made upon him by Schiller, with his tall slight figure and
irresistibly attractive blue eyes. His only complaint was that, owing to a
well-meant trick played on him by his friend, he had been placed in a most
trying position; for the latter had managed to send Schiller a small volume
of Adolph Wagner’s poems in advance.
The young poet was much embarrassed to hear Schiller address him in
flattering terms on the subject of his poetry, but was convinced that the
great man was merely encouraging him out of kindness. Afterwards he
devoted himself entirely to philological studios—one of his best-known
publications in that department being his Parnasso Italiano, which he
dedicated to Goethe in an Italian poem. True, I have heard experts say that
the latter was written in unusually pompous Italian; but Goethe sent him a
letter full of praise, as well as a silver cup from his own household plate.
The impression that I, as a boy of eight, conceived of Adolph Wagner, amid
the surroundings of his own home, was that he was a peculiarly puzzling
character.
I soon had to leave the influence of this environment and was brought
back to my people at Dresden. Meanwhile my family, under the guidance of
my bereaved mother, had been obliged to settle down as well as they could
under the circumstances. My eldest brother Albert, who originally intended
to study medicine, had, upon the advice of Weber, who had much admired
his beautiful tenor voice, started his theatrical career in Breslau. My second
sister Louisa soon followed his example, and became an actress. My eldest
sister Rosalie had obtained an excellent engagement at the Dresden Court
Theatre, and the younger members of the family all looked up to her; for
she was now the main support of our poor sorrowing mother. My family
still occupied the same comfortable home which my father had made for
them. Some of the spare rooms were occasionally let to strangers, and
Spohr was among those who at one time lodged with us. Thanks to her
great energy, and to help received from various sources (among which the
continued generosity of the Court, out of respect to the memory of my late
stepfather, must not be forgotten), my mother managed so well in making
both ends meet, that even my education did not suffer.
Page 20
After it had been decided that my sister Clara, owing to her exceedingly
beautiful voice, should also go on the stage, my mother took the greatest
care to prevent me from developing any taste whatever for the theatre. She
never ceased to reproach herself for having consented to the theatrical
career of my eldest brother, and as my second brother showed no greater
talents than those which were useful to him as a goldsmith, it was now her
chief desire to see some progress made towards the fulfilment of the hopes
and wishes of my step-father, ‘who hoped to make something of me.’ On
the completion of my eighth year I was sent to the Kreuz Grammar School
in Dresden, where it was hoped I would study! There I was placed at the
bottom of the lowest class, and started my education under the most
unassuming auspices.
My mother noted with much interest the slightest signs I might show of a
growing love and ability for my work. She herself, though not highly
educated, always created a lasting impression on all who really learnt to
know her, and displayed a peculiar combination of practical domestic
efficiency and keen intellectual animation. She never gave one of her
children any definite information concerning her antecedents. She came
from Weissenfels, and admitted that her parents had been bakers[4] there.
Even in regard to her maiden name she always spoke with some
embarrassment, and intimated that it was ‘Perthes,’ though, as we
afterwards ascertained, it was in reality ‘Bertz.’ Strange to say, she had been
placed in a high-class boarding-school in Leipzig, where she had enjoyed
the advantage of the care and interest of one of ‘her father’s influential
friends,’ to whom she afterwards referred as being a Weimar prince who
had been very kind to her family in Weissenfels. Her education in that
establishment seems to have been interrupted on account of the sudden
death of this ‘friend.’ She became acquainted with my father at a very early
age, and married him in the first bloom of her youth, he also being very
young, though he already held an appointment. Her chief characteristics
seem to have been a keen sense of humour and an amiable temper, so we
need not suppose that it was merely a sense of duty towards the family of a
departed comrade that afterwards induced the admirable Ludwig Geyer to
enter into matrimony with her when she was no longer youthful, but rather
that he was impelled to that step by a sincere and warm regard for the
widow of his friend. A portrait of her, painted by Geyer during the lifetime
of my father, gives one a very favourable impression of what she must have
beautiful voice, should also go on the stage, my mother took the greatest
care to prevent me from developing any taste whatever for the theatre. She
never ceased to reproach herself for having consented to the theatrical
career of my eldest brother, and as my second brother showed no greater
talents than those which were useful to him as a goldsmith, it was now her
chief desire to see some progress made towards the fulfilment of the hopes
and wishes of my step-father, ‘who hoped to make something of me.’ On
the completion of my eighth year I was sent to the Kreuz Grammar School
in Dresden, where it was hoped I would study! There I was placed at the
bottom of the lowest class, and started my education under the most
unassuming auspices.
My mother noted with much interest the slightest signs I might show of a
growing love and ability for my work. She herself, though not highly
educated, always created a lasting impression on all who really learnt to
know her, and displayed a peculiar combination of practical domestic
efficiency and keen intellectual animation. She never gave one of her
children any definite information concerning her antecedents. She came
from Weissenfels, and admitted that her parents had been bakers[4] there.
Even in regard to her maiden name she always spoke with some
embarrassment, and intimated that it was ‘Perthes,’ though, as we
afterwards ascertained, it was in reality ‘Bertz.’ Strange to say, she had been
placed in a high-class boarding-school in Leipzig, where she had enjoyed
the advantage of the care and interest of one of ‘her father’s influential
friends,’ to whom she afterwards referred as being a Weimar prince who
had been very kind to her family in Weissenfels. Her education in that
establishment seems to have been interrupted on account of the sudden
death of this ‘friend.’ She became acquainted with my father at a very early
age, and married him in the first bloom of her youth, he also being very
young, though he already held an appointment. Her chief characteristics
seem to have been a keen sense of humour and an amiable temper, so we
need not suppose that it was merely a sense of duty towards the family of a
departed comrade that afterwards induced the admirable Ludwig Geyer to
enter into matrimony with her when she was no longer youthful, but rather
that he was impelled to that step by a sincere and warm regard for the
widow of his friend. A portrait of her, painted by Geyer during the lifetime
of my father, gives one a very favourable impression of what she must have
Page 21
been. Even from the time when my recollection of her is quite distinct, she
always had to wear a cap owing to some slight affection of the head, so that
I have no recollection of her as a young and pretty mother. Her trying
position at the head of a numerous family (of which I was the seventh
surviving member), the difficulty of obtaining the wherewithal to rear them,
and of keeping up appearances on very limited resources, did not conduce
to evolve that tender sweetness and solicitude which are usually associated
with motherhood. I hardly ever recollect her having fondled me. Indeed,
demonstrations of affection were not common in our family, although a
certain impetuous, almost passionate and boisterous manner always
characterised our dealings. This being so, it naturally seemed to me quite a
great event when one night I, fretful with sleepiness, looked up at her with
tearful eyes as she was taking me to bed, and saw her gaze back at me
proudly and fondly, and speak of me to a visitor then present with a certain
amount of tenderness.
[4] According to more recent information—mill owners.
What struck me more particularly about her was the strange enthusiasm
and almost pathetic manner with which she spoke of the great and of the
beautiful in Art. Under this heading, however, she would never have let me
suppose that she included dramatic art, but only Poetry, Music, and
Painting. Consequently, she often even threatened me with her curse should
I ever express a desire to go on the stage. Moreover, she was very
religiously inclined. With intense fervour she would often give us long
sermons about God and the divine quality in man, during which, now and
again, suddenly lowering her voice in a rather funny way, she would
interrupt herself in order to rebuke one of us. After the death of our
stepfather she used to assemble us all round her bed every morning, when
one of us would read out a hymn or a part of the Church service from the
prayer-book before she took her coffee. Sometimes the choice of the part to
be read was hardly appropriate, as, for instance, when my sister Clara on
one occasion thoughtlessly read the ‘Prayer to be said in time of War,’ and
delivered it with so much expression that my mother interrupted her,
saying: ‘Oh, stop! Good gracious me! Things are not quite so bad as that.
There’s no war on at present!’
In spite of our limited means we had lively and—as they appeared to my
boyish imagination—even brilliant evening parties sometimes. After the
always had to wear a cap owing to some slight affection of the head, so that
I have no recollection of her as a young and pretty mother. Her trying
position at the head of a numerous family (of which I was the seventh
surviving member), the difficulty of obtaining the wherewithal to rear them,
and of keeping up appearances on very limited resources, did not conduce
to evolve that tender sweetness and solicitude which are usually associated
with motherhood. I hardly ever recollect her having fondled me. Indeed,
demonstrations of affection were not common in our family, although a
certain impetuous, almost passionate and boisterous manner always
characterised our dealings. This being so, it naturally seemed to me quite a
great event when one night I, fretful with sleepiness, looked up at her with
tearful eyes as she was taking me to bed, and saw her gaze back at me
proudly and fondly, and speak of me to a visitor then present with a certain
amount of tenderness.
[4] According to more recent information—mill owners.
What struck me more particularly about her was the strange enthusiasm
and almost pathetic manner with which she spoke of the great and of the
beautiful in Art. Under this heading, however, she would never have let me
suppose that she included dramatic art, but only Poetry, Music, and
Painting. Consequently, she often even threatened me with her curse should
I ever express a desire to go on the stage. Moreover, she was very
religiously inclined. With intense fervour she would often give us long
sermons about God and the divine quality in man, during which, now and
again, suddenly lowering her voice in a rather funny way, she would
interrupt herself in order to rebuke one of us. After the death of our
stepfather she used to assemble us all round her bed every morning, when
one of us would read out a hymn or a part of the Church service from the
prayer-book before she took her coffee. Sometimes the choice of the part to
be read was hardly appropriate, as, for instance, when my sister Clara on
one occasion thoughtlessly read the ‘Prayer to be said in time of War,’ and
delivered it with so much expression that my mother interrupted her,
saying: ‘Oh, stop! Good gracious me! Things are not quite so bad as that.
There’s no war on at present!’
In spite of our limited means we had lively and—as they appeared to my
boyish imagination—even brilliant evening parties sometimes. After the
Page 22
death of my stepfather, who, thanks to his success as a portrait painter, in
the later years of his life had raised his income to what for those days was a
really decent total, many agreeable acquaintances of very good social
position whom he had made during this flourishing period still remained on
friendly terms with us, and would occasionally join us at our evening
gatherings. Amongst those who came were the members of the Court
Theatre, who at that time gave very charming and highly entertaining
parties of their own, which, on my return to Dresden later on, I found had
been altogether given up.
Very delightful, too, were the picnics arranged between us and our
friends at some of the beautiful spots around Dresden, for these excursions
were always brightened by a certain artistic spirit and general good cheer. I
remember one such outing we arranged to Loschwitz, where we made a
kind of gypsy camp, in which Carl Maria von Weber played his part in the
character of cook. At home we also had some music. My sister Rosalie
played the piano, and Clara was beginning to sing. Of the various theatrical
performances we organised in those early days, often after elaborate
preparation, with the view of amusing ourselves on the birthdays of our
elders, I can hardly remember one, save a parody on the romantic play of
Sappho, by Grillparzer, in which I took part as one of the singers in the
crowd that preceded Phaon’s triumphal car. I endeavoured to revive these
memories by means of a fine puppet show, which I found among the effects
of my late stepfather, and for which he himself had painted some beautiful
scenery. It was my intention to surprise my people by means of a brilliant
performance on this little stage. After I had very clumsily made several
puppets, and had provided them with a scanty wardrobe made from cuttings
of material purloined from my sisters, I started to compose a chivalric
drama, in which I proposed to rehearse my puppets. When I had drafted the
first scene, my sisters happened to discover the MS. and literally laughed it
to scorn, and, to my great annoyance, for a long time afterwards they
chaffed me by repeating one particular sentence which I had put into the
mouth of the heroine, and which was—Ich hore schon den Ritter trapsen (‘I
hear his knightly footsteps falling’). I now returned with renewed ardour to
the theatre, with which, even at this time, my family was in close touch.
Den Freischutz in particular appealed very strongly to my imagination,
mainly on account of its ghostly theme. The emotions of terror and the
dread of ghosts formed quite an important factor in the development of my
the later years of his life had raised his income to what for those days was a
really decent total, many agreeable acquaintances of very good social
position whom he had made during this flourishing period still remained on
friendly terms with us, and would occasionally join us at our evening
gatherings. Amongst those who came were the members of the Court
Theatre, who at that time gave very charming and highly entertaining
parties of their own, which, on my return to Dresden later on, I found had
been altogether given up.
Very delightful, too, were the picnics arranged between us and our
friends at some of the beautiful spots around Dresden, for these excursions
were always brightened by a certain artistic spirit and general good cheer. I
remember one such outing we arranged to Loschwitz, where we made a
kind of gypsy camp, in which Carl Maria von Weber played his part in the
character of cook. At home we also had some music. My sister Rosalie
played the piano, and Clara was beginning to sing. Of the various theatrical
performances we organised in those early days, often after elaborate
preparation, with the view of amusing ourselves on the birthdays of our
elders, I can hardly remember one, save a parody on the romantic play of
Sappho, by Grillparzer, in which I took part as one of the singers in the
crowd that preceded Phaon’s triumphal car. I endeavoured to revive these
memories by means of a fine puppet show, which I found among the effects
of my late stepfather, and for which he himself had painted some beautiful
scenery. It was my intention to surprise my people by means of a brilliant
performance on this little stage. After I had very clumsily made several
puppets, and had provided them with a scanty wardrobe made from cuttings
of material purloined from my sisters, I started to compose a chivalric
drama, in which I proposed to rehearse my puppets. When I had drafted the
first scene, my sisters happened to discover the MS. and literally laughed it
to scorn, and, to my great annoyance, for a long time afterwards they
chaffed me by repeating one particular sentence which I had put into the
mouth of the heroine, and which was—Ich hore schon den Ritter trapsen (‘I
hear his knightly footsteps falling’). I now returned with renewed ardour to
the theatre, with which, even at this time, my family was in close touch.
Den Freischutz in particular appealed very strongly to my imagination,
mainly on account of its ghostly theme. The emotions of terror and the
dread of ghosts formed quite an important factor in the development of my
Page 23
mind. From my earliest childhood certain mysterious and uncanny things
exercised an enormous influence over me. If I were left alone in a room for
long, I remember that, when gazing at lifeless objects such as pieces of
furniture, and concentrating my attention upon them, I would suddenly
shriek out with fright, because they seemed to me alive. Even during the
latest years of my boyhood, not a night passed without my waking out of
some ghostly dream and uttering the most frightful shrieks, which subsided
only at the sound of some human voice. The most severe rebuke or even
chastisement seemed to me at those times no more than a blessed release.
None of my brothers or sisters would sleep anywhere near me. They put me
to sleep as far as possible away from the others, without thinking that my
cries for help would only be louder and longer; but in the end they got used
even to this nightly disturbance.
In connection with this childish terror, what attracted me so strongly to
the theatre—by which I mean also the stage, the rooms behind the scenes,
and the dressing-rooms—was not so much the desire for entertainment and
amusement such as that which impels the present-day theatre-goers, but the
fascinating pleasure of finding myself in an entirely different atmosphere, in
a world that was purely fantastic and often gruesomely attractive. Thus to
me a scene, even a wing, representing a bush, or some costume or
characteristic part of it, seemed to come from another world, to be in some
way as attractive as an apparition, and I felt that contact with it might serve
as a lever to lift me from the dull reality of daily routine to that delightful
region of spirits. Everything connected with a theatrical performance had
for me the charm of mystery, it both bewitched and fascinated me, and
while I was trying, with the help of a few playmates, to imitate the
performance of Der Freischutz, and to devote myself energetically to
reproducing the needful costumes and masks in my grotesque style of
painting, the more elegant contents of my sisters’ wardrobes, in the
beautifying of which I had often seen the family occupied, exercised a
subtle charm over my imagination; nay, my heart would beat madly at the
very touch of one of their dresses.
In spite of the fact that, as I already mentioned, our family was not given
to outward manifestations of affection, yet the fact that I was brought up
entirely among feminine surroundings must necessarily have influenced the
development of the sensitive side of my nature. Perhaps it was precisely
because my immediate circle was generally rough and impetuous, that the
exercised an enormous influence over me. If I were left alone in a room for
long, I remember that, when gazing at lifeless objects such as pieces of
furniture, and concentrating my attention upon them, I would suddenly
shriek out with fright, because they seemed to me alive. Even during the
latest years of my boyhood, not a night passed without my waking out of
some ghostly dream and uttering the most frightful shrieks, which subsided
only at the sound of some human voice. The most severe rebuke or even
chastisement seemed to me at those times no more than a blessed release.
None of my brothers or sisters would sleep anywhere near me. They put me
to sleep as far as possible away from the others, without thinking that my
cries for help would only be louder and longer; but in the end they got used
even to this nightly disturbance.
In connection with this childish terror, what attracted me so strongly to
the theatre—by which I mean also the stage, the rooms behind the scenes,
and the dressing-rooms—was not so much the desire for entertainment and
amusement such as that which impels the present-day theatre-goers, but the
fascinating pleasure of finding myself in an entirely different atmosphere, in
a world that was purely fantastic and often gruesomely attractive. Thus to
me a scene, even a wing, representing a bush, or some costume or
characteristic part of it, seemed to come from another world, to be in some
way as attractive as an apparition, and I felt that contact with it might serve
as a lever to lift me from the dull reality of daily routine to that delightful
region of spirits. Everything connected with a theatrical performance had
for me the charm of mystery, it both bewitched and fascinated me, and
while I was trying, with the help of a few playmates, to imitate the
performance of Der Freischutz, and to devote myself energetically to
reproducing the needful costumes and masks in my grotesque style of
painting, the more elegant contents of my sisters’ wardrobes, in the
beautifying of which I had often seen the family occupied, exercised a
subtle charm over my imagination; nay, my heart would beat madly at the
very touch of one of their dresses.
In spite of the fact that, as I already mentioned, our family was not given
to outward manifestations of affection, yet the fact that I was brought up
entirely among feminine surroundings must necessarily have influenced the
development of the sensitive side of my nature. Perhaps it was precisely
because my immediate circle was generally rough and impetuous, that the
Page 24
opposite characteristics of womanhood, especially such as were connected
with the imaginary world of the theatre, created a feeling of such tender
longing in me.
Luckily these fantastic humours, merging from the gruesome into the
mawkish, were counteracted and balanced by more serious influences
undergone at school at the hands of my teachers and schoolfellows. Even
there, it was chiefly the weird that aroused my keenest interest. I can hardly
judge whether I had what would be called a good head for study. I think
that, in general, what I really liked I was soon able to grasp without much
effort, whereas I hardly exerted myself at all in the study of subjects that
were uncongenial. This characteristic was most marked in regard to
arithmetic and, later on, mathematics. In neither of these subjects did I ever
succeed in bringing my mind seriously to bear upon the tasks that were set
me. In the matter of the Classics, too, I paid only just as much attention as
was absolutely necessary to enable me to get a grasp of them; for I was
stimulated by the desire to reproduce them to myself dramatically. In this
way Greek particularly attracted me, because the stories from Greek
mythology so seized upon my fancy that I tried to imagine their heroes as
speaking to me in their native tongue, so as to satisfy my longing for
complete familiarity with them. In these circumstances it will be readily
understood that the grammar of the language seemed to me merely a
tiresome obstacle, and by no means in itself an interesting branch of
knowledge.
The fact that my study of languages was never very thorough, perhaps
best explains the fact that I was afterwards so ready to cease troubling about
them altogether. Not until much later did this study really begin to interest
me again, and that was only when I learnt to understand its physiological
and philosophical side, as it was revealed to our modern Germanists by the
pioneer work of Jakob Grimm. Then, when it was too late to apply myself
thoroughly to a study which at last I had learned to appreciate, I regretted
that this newer conception of the study of languages had not yet found
acceptance in our colleges when I was younger.
Nevertheless, by my successes in philological work I managed to attract
the attention of a young teacher at the Kreuz Grammar School, a Master of
Arts named Sillig, who proved very helpful to me. He often permitted me to
visit him and show him my work, consisting of metric translations and a
with the imaginary world of the theatre, created a feeling of such tender
longing in me.
Luckily these fantastic humours, merging from the gruesome into the
mawkish, were counteracted and balanced by more serious influences
undergone at school at the hands of my teachers and schoolfellows. Even
there, it was chiefly the weird that aroused my keenest interest. I can hardly
judge whether I had what would be called a good head for study. I think
that, in general, what I really liked I was soon able to grasp without much
effort, whereas I hardly exerted myself at all in the study of subjects that
were uncongenial. This characteristic was most marked in regard to
arithmetic and, later on, mathematics. In neither of these subjects did I ever
succeed in bringing my mind seriously to bear upon the tasks that were set
me. In the matter of the Classics, too, I paid only just as much attention as
was absolutely necessary to enable me to get a grasp of them; for I was
stimulated by the desire to reproduce them to myself dramatically. In this
way Greek particularly attracted me, because the stories from Greek
mythology so seized upon my fancy that I tried to imagine their heroes as
speaking to me in their native tongue, so as to satisfy my longing for
complete familiarity with them. In these circumstances it will be readily
understood that the grammar of the language seemed to me merely a
tiresome obstacle, and by no means in itself an interesting branch of
knowledge.
The fact that my study of languages was never very thorough, perhaps
best explains the fact that I was afterwards so ready to cease troubling about
them altogether. Not until much later did this study really begin to interest
me again, and that was only when I learnt to understand its physiological
and philosophical side, as it was revealed to our modern Germanists by the
pioneer work of Jakob Grimm. Then, when it was too late to apply myself
thoroughly to a study which at last I had learned to appreciate, I regretted
that this newer conception of the study of languages had not yet found
acceptance in our colleges when I was younger.
Nevertheless, by my successes in philological work I managed to attract
the attention of a young teacher at the Kreuz Grammar School, a Master of
Arts named Sillig, who proved very helpful to me. He often permitted me to
visit him and show him my work, consisting of metric translations and a
Page 25
few original poems, and he always seemed very pleased with my efforts in
recitation. What he thought of me may best be judged perhaps from the fact
that he made me, as a boy of about twelve, recite not only ‘Hector’s
Farewell’ from the Iliad, but even Hamlet’s celebrated monologue. On one
occasion, when I was in the fourth form of the school, one of my
schoolfellows, a boy named Starke, suddenly fell dead, and the tragic event
aroused so much sympathy, that not only did the whole school attend the
funeral, but the headmaster also ordered that a poem should be written in
commemoration of the ceremony, and that this poem should be published.
Of the various poems submitted, among which there was one by myself,
prepared very hurriedly, none seemed to the master worthy of the honour
which he had promised, and he therefore announced his intention of
substituting one of his own speeches in the place of our rejected attempts.
Much distressed by this decision, I quickly sought out Professor Sillig, with
the view of urging him to intervene on behalf of my poem. We thereupon
went through it together. Its well-constructed and well-rhymed verses,
written in stanzas of eight lines, determined him to revise the whole of it
carefully. Much of its imagery was bombastic, and far beyond the
conception of a boy of my age. I recollect that in one part I had drawn
extensively from the monologue in Addison’s Cato, spoken by Cato just
before his suicide. I had met with this passage in an English grammar, and it
had made a deep impression upon me. The words: ‘The stars shall fade
away, the sun himself grow dim with age, and nature sink in years,’ which,
at all events, were a direct plagiarism, made Sillig laugh—a thing at which I
was a little offended. However, I felt very grateful to him, for, thanks to the
care and rapidity with which he cleared my poem of these extravagances, it
was eventually accepted by the headmaster, printed, and widely circulated.
The effect of this success was extraordinary, both on my schoolfellows
and on my own family. My mother devoutly folded her hands in
thankfulness, and in my own mind my vocation seemed quite a settled
thing. It was clear, beyond the possibility of a doubt, that I was destined to
be a poet. Professor Sillig wished me to compose a grand epic, and
suggested as a subject ‘The Battle of Parnassus,’ as described by Pausanias.
His reasons for this choice were based upon the legend related by
Pausanias, viz., that in the second century B.C. the Muses from Parnassus
aided the combined Greek armies against the destructive invasion of the
recitation. What he thought of me may best be judged perhaps from the fact
that he made me, as a boy of about twelve, recite not only ‘Hector’s
Farewell’ from the Iliad, but even Hamlet’s celebrated monologue. On one
occasion, when I was in the fourth form of the school, one of my
schoolfellows, a boy named Starke, suddenly fell dead, and the tragic event
aroused so much sympathy, that not only did the whole school attend the
funeral, but the headmaster also ordered that a poem should be written in
commemoration of the ceremony, and that this poem should be published.
Of the various poems submitted, among which there was one by myself,
prepared very hurriedly, none seemed to the master worthy of the honour
which he had promised, and he therefore announced his intention of
substituting one of his own speeches in the place of our rejected attempts.
Much distressed by this decision, I quickly sought out Professor Sillig, with
the view of urging him to intervene on behalf of my poem. We thereupon
went through it together. Its well-constructed and well-rhymed verses,
written in stanzas of eight lines, determined him to revise the whole of it
carefully. Much of its imagery was bombastic, and far beyond the
conception of a boy of my age. I recollect that in one part I had drawn
extensively from the monologue in Addison’s Cato, spoken by Cato just
before his suicide. I had met with this passage in an English grammar, and it
had made a deep impression upon me. The words: ‘The stars shall fade
away, the sun himself grow dim with age, and nature sink in years,’ which,
at all events, were a direct plagiarism, made Sillig laugh—a thing at which I
was a little offended. However, I felt very grateful to him, for, thanks to the
care and rapidity with which he cleared my poem of these extravagances, it
was eventually accepted by the headmaster, printed, and widely circulated.
The effect of this success was extraordinary, both on my schoolfellows
and on my own family. My mother devoutly folded her hands in
thankfulness, and in my own mind my vocation seemed quite a settled
thing. It was clear, beyond the possibility of a doubt, that I was destined to
be a poet. Professor Sillig wished me to compose a grand epic, and
suggested as a subject ‘The Battle of Parnassus,’ as described by Pausanias.
His reasons for this choice were based upon the legend related by
Pausanias, viz., that in the second century B.C. the Muses from Parnassus
aided the combined Greek armies against the destructive invasion of the
Page 26
Gauls by provoking a panic among the latter. I actually began my heroic
poem in hexameter verse, but could not get through the first canto.
Not being far enough advanced in the language to understand the Greek
tragedies thoroughly in the original, my own attempts to construct a tragedy
in the Greek form were greatly influenced by the fact that quite by accident
I came across August Apel’s clever imitation of this style in his striking
poems ‘Polyidos’ and ‘Aitolier.’ For my theme I selected the death of
Ulysses, from a fable of Hyginus, according to which the aged hero is killed
by his son, the offspring of his union with Calypso. But I did not get very
far with this work either, before I gave it up.
My mind became so bent upon this sort of thing, that duller studies
naturally ceased to interest me. The mythology, legends, and, at last, the
history of Greece alone attracted me.
I was fond of life, merry with my companions, and always ready for a
joke or an adventure. Moreover, I was constantly forming friendships,
almost passionate in their ardour, with one or the other of my comrades, and
in choosing my associates I was mainly influenced by the extent to which
my new acquaintance appealed to my eccentric imagination. At one time it
would be poetising and versifying that decided my choice of a friend; at
another, theatrical enterprises, while now and then it would be a longing for
rambling and mischief.
Furthermore, when I reached my thirteenth year, a great change came
over our family affairs. My sister Rosalie, who had become the chief
support of our household, obtained an advantageous engagement at the
theatre in Prague, whither mother and children removed in 1820, thus
giving up the Dresden home altogether. I was left behind in Dresden, so that
I might continue to attend the Kreuz Grammar School until I was ready to
go up to the university. I was therefore sent to board and lodge with a
family named Bohme, whose sons I had known at school, and in whose
house I already felt quite at home. With my residence in this somewhat
rough, poor, and not particularly well-conducted family, my years of
dissipation began. I no longer enjoyed the quiet retirement necessary for
work, nor the gentle, spiritual influence of my sisters’ companionship. On
the contrary, I was plunged into a busy, restless life, full of rough horseplay
and of quarrels. Nevertheless, it was there that I began to experience the
influence of the gentler sex in a manner hitherto unknown to me, as the
poem in hexameter verse, but could not get through the first canto.
Not being far enough advanced in the language to understand the Greek
tragedies thoroughly in the original, my own attempts to construct a tragedy
in the Greek form were greatly influenced by the fact that quite by accident
I came across August Apel’s clever imitation of this style in his striking
poems ‘Polyidos’ and ‘Aitolier.’ For my theme I selected the death of
Ulysses, from a fable of Hyginus, according to which the aged hero is killed
by his son, the offspring of his union with Calypso. But I did not get very
far with this work either, before I gave it up.
My mind became so bent upon this sort of thing, that duller studies
naturally ceased to interest me. The mythology, legends, and, at last, the
history of Greece alone attracted me.
I was fond of life, merry with my companions, and always ready for a
joke or an adventure. Moreover, I was constantly forming friendships,
almost passionate in their ardour, with one or the other of my comrades, and
in choosing my associates I was mainly influenced by the extent to which
my new acquaintance appealed to my eccentric imagination. At one time it
would be poetising and versifying that decided my choice of a friend; at
another, theatrical enterprises, while now and then it would be a longing for
rambling and mischief.
Furthermore, when I reached my thirteenth year, a great change came
over our family affairs. My sister Rosalie, who had become the chief
support of our household, obtained an advantageous engagement at the
theatre in Prague, whither mother and children removed in 1820, thus
giving up the Dresden home altogether. I was left behind in Dresden, so that
I might continue to attend the Kreuz Grammar School until I was ready to
go up to the university. I was therefore sent to board and lodge with a
family named Bohme, whose sons I had known at school, and in whose
house I already felt quite at home. With my residence in this somewhat
rough, poor, and not particularly well-conducted family, my years of
dissipation began. I no longer enjoyed the quiet retirement necessary for
work, nor the gentle, spiritual influence of my sisters’ companionship. On
the contrary, I was plunged into a busy, restless life, full of rough horseplay
and of quarrels. Nevertheless, it was there that I began to experience the
influence of the gentler sex in a manner hitherto unknown to me, as the
Page 27
grown-up daughters of the family and their friends often filled the scanty
and narrow rooms of the house. Indeed, my first recollections of boyish
love date from this period. I remember a very beautiful young girl, whose
name, if I am not mistaken, was Amalie Hoffmann, coming to call at the
house one Sunday. She was charmingly dressed, and her appearance as she
came into the room literally struck me dumb with amazement. On other
occasions I recollect pretending to be too helplessly sleepy to move, so that
I might be carried up to bed by the girls, that being, as they thought, the
only remedy for my condition. And I repeated this, because I found, to my
surprise, that their attention under these circumstances brought me into
closer and more gratifying proximity with them.
The most important event during this year of separation from my family
was, however, a short visit I paid to them in Prague. In the middle of the
winter my mother came to Dresden, and took me hack with her to Prague
for a week. Her way of travelling was quite unique. To the end of her days
she preferred the more dangerous mode of travelling in a hackney carriage
to the quicker journey by mail-coach, so that we spent three whole days in
the bitter cold on the road from Dresden to Prague. The journey over the
Bohemian mountains often seemed to be beset with the greatest dangers,
but happily we survived our thrilling adventures and at last arrived in
Prague, where I was suddenly plunged into entirely new surroundings.
For a long time the thought of leaving Saxony on another visit to
Bohemia, and especially Prague, had had quite a romantic attraction for me.
The foreign nationality, the broken German of the people, the peculiar
headgear of the women, the native wines, the harp-girls and musicians, and
finally, the ever present signs of Catholicism, its numerous chapels and
shrines, all produced on me a strangely exhilarating impression. This was
probably due to my craze for everything theatrical and spectacular, as
distinguished from simple bourgeois customs. Above all, the antique
splendour and beauty of the incomparable city of Prague became indelibly
stamped on my fancy. Even in my own family surroundings I found
attractions to which I had hitherto been a stranger. For instance, my sister
Ottilie, only two years older than myself, had won the devoted friendship of
a noble family, that of Count Pachta, two of whose daughters, Jenny and
Auguste, who had long been famed as the leading beauties of Prague, had
become fondly attached to her. To me, such people and such a connection
were something quite novel and enchanting. Besides these, certain beaux
and narrow rooms of the house. Indeed, my first recollections of boyish
love date from this period. I remember a very beautiful young girl, whose
name, if I am not mistaken, was Amalie Hoffmann, coming to call at the
house one Sunday. She was charmingly dressed, and her appearance as she
came into the room literally struck me dumb with amazement. On other
occasions I recollect pretending to be too helplessly sleepy to move, so that
I might be carried up to bed by the girls, that being, as they thought, the
only remedy for my condition. And I repeated this, because I found, to my
surprise, that their attention under these circumstances brought me into
closer and more gratifying proximity with them.
The most important event during this year of separation from my family
was, however, a short visit I paid to them in Prague. In the middle of the
winter my mother came to Dresden, and took me hack with her to Prague
for a week. Her way of travelling was quite unique. To the end of her days
she preferred the more dangerous mode of travelling in a hackney carriage
to the quicker journey by mail-coach, so that we spent three whole days in
the bitter cold on the road from Dresden to Prague. The journey over the
Bohemian mountains often seemed to be beset with the greatest dangers,
but happily we survived our thrilling adventures and at last arrived in
Prague, where I was suddenly plunged into entirely new surroundings.
For a long time the thought of leaving Saxony on another visit to
Bohemia, and especially Prague, had had quite a romantic attraction for me.
The foreign nationality, the broken German of the people, the peculiar
headgear of the women, the native wines, the harp-girls and musicians, and
finally, the ever present signs of Catholicism, its numerous chapels and
shrines, all produced on me a strangely exhilarating impression. This was
probably due to my craze for everything theatrical and spectacular, as
distinguished from simple bourgeois customs. Above all, the antique
splendour and beauty of the incomparable city of Prague became indelibly
stamped on my fancy. Even in my own family surroundings I found
attractions to which I had hitherto been a stranger. For instance, my sister
Ottilie, only two years older than myself, had won the devoted friendship of
a noble family, that of Count Pachta, two of whose daughters, Jenny and
Auguste, who had long been famed as the leading beauties of Prague, had
become fondly attached to her. To me, such people and such a connection
were something quite novel and enchanting. Besides these, certain beaux
Page 28
esprits of Prague, among them W. Marsano, a strikingly handsome and
charming man, were frequent visitors at our house. They often earnestly
discussed the tales of Hoffmann, which at that date were comparatively
new, and had created some sensation. It was now that I made my first
though rather superficial acquaintance with this romantic visionary, and so
received a stimulus which influenced me for many years even to the point
of infatuation, and gave me very peculiar ideas of the world.
In the following spring, 1827, I repeated this journey from Dresden to
Prague, but this time on foot, and accompanied by my friend Rudolf
Bohme. Our tour was full of adventure. We got to within an hour of Teplitz
the first night, and next day we had to get a lift in a wagon, as we had
walked our feet sore; yet this only took us as far as Lowositz, as our funds
had quite run out. Under a scorching sun, hungry and half-fainting, we
wandered along bypaths through absolutely unknown country, until at
sundown we happened to reach the main road just as an elegant travelling
coach came in sight. I humbled my pride so far as to pretend I was a
travelling journeyman, and begged the distinguished travellers for alms,
while my friend timidly hid himself in the ditch by the roadside. Luckily we
decided to seek shelter for the night in an inn, where we took counsel
whether we should spend the alms just received on a supper or a bed. We
decided for the supper, proposing to spend the night under the open sky.
While we were refreshing ourselves, a strange-looking wayfarer entered. He
wore a black velvet skull-cap, to which a metal lyre was attached like a
cockade, and on his back he bore a harp. Very cheerfully he set down his
instrument, made himself comfortable, and called for a good meal. He
intended to stay the night, and to continue his way next day to Prague,
where he lived, and whither he was returning from Hanover.
My good spirits and courage were stimulated by the jovial manners of
this merry fellow, who constantly repeated his favourite motto, ‘non plus
ultra.’ We soon struck up an acquaintance, and in return for my confidence,
the strolling player’s attitude to me was one of almost touching sympathy. It
was agreed that we should continue our journey together next day on foot.
He lent me two twenty-kreutzer pieces (about ninepence), and allowed me
to write my Prague address in his pocket-book. I was highly delighted at
this personal success. My harpist grew extravagantly merry; a good deal of
Czernosek wine was drunk; he sang and played on his harp like a madman,
continually reiterating his ‘non plus ultra’ till at last, overcome with wine,
charming man, were frequent visitors at our house. They often earnestly
discussed the tales of Hoffmann, which at that date were comparatively
new, and had created some sensation. It was now that I made my first
though rather superficial acquaintance with this romantic visionary, and so
received a stimulus which influenced me for many years even to the point
of infatuation, and gave me very peculiar ideas of the world.
In the following spring, 1827, I repeated this journey from Dresden to
Prague, but this time on foot, and accompanied by my friend Rudolf
Bohme. Our tour was full of adventure. We got to within an hour of Teplitz
the first night, and next day we had to get a lift in a wagon, as we had
walked our feet sore; yet this only took us as far as Lowositz, as our funds
had quite run out. Under a scorching sun, hungry and half-fainting, we
wandered along bypaths through absolutely unknown country, until at
sundown we happened to reach the main road just as an elegant travelling
coach came in sight. I humbled my pride so far as to pretend I was a
travelling journeyman, and begged the distinguished travellers for alms,
while my friend timidly hid himself in the ditch by the roadside. Luckily we
decided to seek shelter for the night in an inn, where we took counsel
whether we should spend the alms just received on a supper or a bed. We
decided for the supper, proposing to spend the night under the open sky.
While we were refreshing ourselves, a strange-looking wayfarer entered. He
wore a black velvet skull-cap, to which a metal lyre was attached like a
cockade, and on his back he bore a harp. Very cheerfully he set down his
instrument, made himself comfortable, and called for a good meal. He
intended to stay the night, and to continue his way next day to Prague,
where he lived, and whither he was returning from Hanover.
My good spirits and courage were stimulated by the jovial manners of
this merry fellow, who constantly repeated his favourite motto, ‘non plus
ultra.’ We soon struck up an acquaintance, and in return for my confidence,
the strolling player’s attitude to me was one of almost touching sympathy. It
was agreed that we should continue our journey together next day on foot.
He lent me two twenty-kreutzer pieces (about ninepence), and allowed me
to write my Prague address in his pocket-book. I was highly delighted at
this personal success. My harpist grew extravagantly merry; a good deal of
Czernosek wine was drunk; he sang and played on his harp like a madman,
continually reiterating his ‘non plus ultra’ till at last, overcome with wine,
Page 29
he fell down on the straw, which had been spread out on the floor for our
common bed. When the sun once more peeped in, we could not rouse him,
and we had to make up our minds to set off in the freshness of the early
morning without him, feeling convinced that the sturdy fellow would
overtake us during the day. But it was in vain that we looked out for him on
the road and during our subsequent stay in Prague. Indeed, it was not until
several weeks later that the extraordinary fellow turned up at my mother’s,
not so much to collect payment of his loan, as to inquire about the welfare
of the young friend to whom that loan had been made.
The remainder of our journey was very fatiguing, and the joy I felt when
I at last beheld Prague from the summit of a hill, at about an hour’s
distance, simply beggars description. Approaching the suburbs, we were for
the second time met by a splendid carriage, from which my sister Ottilie’s
two lovely friends called out to me in astonishment. They had recognised
me immediately, in spite of my terribly sunburnt face, blue linen blouse,
and bright red cotton cap. Overwhelmed with shame, and with my heart
beating like mad, I could hardly utter a word, and hurried away to my
mother’s to attend at once to the restoration of my sunburnt complexion. To
this task I devoted two whole days, during which I swathed my face in
parsley poultices; and not till then did I seek the pleasures of society. When,
on the return journey, I looked back once more on Prague from the same
hilltop, I burst into tears, flung myself on the earth, and for a long time
could not be induced by my astonished companion to pursue the journey. I
was downcast for the rest of the way, and we arrived home in Dresden
without any further adventures.
During the same year I again gratified my fancy for long excursions on
foot by joining a numerous company of grammar school boys, consisting of
pupils of several classes and of various ages, who had decided to spend
their summer holidays in a tour to Leipzig. This journey also stands out
among the memories of my youth, by reason of the strong impressions it
left behind. The characteristic feature of our party was that we all aped the
student, by behaving and dressing extravagantly in the most approved
student fashion. After going as far as Meissen on the market-boat, our path
lay off the main road, through villages with which I was as yet unfamiliar.
We spent the night in the vast barn of a village inn, and our adventures were
of the wildest description. There we saw a large marionette show, with
almost life-sized figures. Our entire party settled themselves in the
common bed. When the sun once more peeped in, we could not rouse him,
and we had to make up our minds to set off in the freshness of the early
morning without him, feeling convinced that the sturdy fellow would
overtake us during the day. But it was in vain that we looked out for him on
the road and during our subsequent stay in Prague. Indeed, it was not until
several weeks later that the extraordinary fellow turned up at my mother’s,
not so much to collect payment of his loan, as to inquire about the welfare
of the young friend to whom that loan had been made.
The remainder of our journey was very fatiguing, and the joy I felt when
I at last beheld Prague from the summit of a hill, at about an hour’s
distance, simply beggars description. Approaching the suburbs, we were for
the second time met by a splendid carriage, from which my sister Ottilie’s
two lovely friends called out to me in astonishment. They had recognised
me immediately, in spite of my terribly sunburnt face, blue linen blouse,
and bright red cotton cap. Overwhelmed with shame, and with my heart
beating like mad, I could hardly utter a word, and hurried away to my
mother’s to attend at once to the restoration of my sunburnt complexion. To
this task I devoted two whole days, during which I swathed my face in
parsley poultices; and not till then did I seek the pleasures of society. When,
on the return journey, I looked back once more on Prague from the same
hilltop, I burst into tears, flung myself on the earth, and for a long time
could not be induced by my astonished companion to pursue the journey. I
was downcast for the rest of the way, and we arrived home in Dresden
without any further adventures.
During the same year I again gratified my fancy for long excursions on
foot by joining a numerous company of grammar school boys, consisting of
pupils of several classes and of various ages, who had decided to spend
their summer holidays in a tour to Leipzig. This journey also stands out
among the memories of my youth, by reason of the strong impressions it
left behind. The characteristic feature of our party was that we all aped the
student, by behaving and dressing extravagantly in the most approved
student fashion. After going as far as Meissen on the market-boat, our path
lay off the main road, through villages with which I was as yet unfamiliar.
We spent the night in the vast barn of a village inn, and our adventures were
of the wildest description. There we saw a large marionette show, with
almost life-sized figures. Our entire party settled themselves in the
Page 30
auditorium, where their presence was a source of some anxiety to the
managers, who had only reckoned on an audience of peasants. Genovefa
was the play given. The ceaseless silly jests, and constant interpolations and
jeering interruptions, in which our corps of embryo-students indulged,
finally aroused the anger even of the peasants, who had come prepared to
weep. I believe I was the only one of our party who was pained by these
impertinences, and in spite of involuntary laughter at some of my
comrades’ jokes, I not only defended the play itself, but also its original,
simple-minded audience. A popular catch-phrase which occurred in the
piece has ever since remained stamped on my memory. ‘Golo’ instructs the
inevitable Kaspar that, when the Count Palatine returns home, he must
‘tickle him behind, so that he should feel it in front’ (hinten zu kitzeln, dass
er es vorne fuhle). Kaspar conveys Golo’s order verbatim to the Count, and
the latter reproaches the unmasked rogue in the following terms, uttered
with the greatest pathos: ‘O Golo, Golo! thou hast told Kaspar to tickle me
behind, so that I shall feel it in front!’
From Grimma our party rode into Leipzig in open carriages, but not until
we had first carefully removed all the outward emblems of the
undergraduate, lest the local students we were likely to meet might make us
rue our presumption.
Since my first visit, when I was eight years old, I had only once returned
to Leipzig, and then for a very brief stay, and under circumstances very
similar to those of the earlier visit. I now renewed my fantastic impressions
of the Thome house, but this time, owing to my more advanced education, I
looked forward to more intelligent intercourse with my uncle Adolph. An
opening for this was soon provided by my joyous astonishment on learning
that a bookcase in the large anteroom, containing a goodly collection of
books, was my property, having been left me by my father. I went through
the books with my uncle, selected at once a number of Latin authors in the
handsome Zweibruck edition, along with sundry attractive looking works of
poetry and belles-lettres, and arranged for them to be sent to Dresden.
During this visit I was very much interested in the life of the students. In
addition to my impressions of the theatre and of Prague, now came those of
the so-called swaggering undergraduate. A great change had taken place in
this class. When, as a lad of eight, I had my first glimpse of students, their
long hair, their old German costume with the black velvet skull-cap and the
shirt collar turned back from the bare neck, had quite taken my fancy. But
managers, who had only reckoned on an audience of peasants. Genovefa
was the play given. The ceaseless silly jests, and constant interpolations and
jeering interruptions, in which our corps of embryo-students indulged,
finally aroused the anger even of the peasants, who had come prepared to
weep. I believe I was the only one of our party who was pained by these
impertinences, and in spite of involuntary laughter at some of my
comrades’ jokes, I not only defended the play itself, but also its original,
simple-minded audience. A popular catch-phrase which occurred in the
piece has ever since remained stamped on my memory. ‘Golo’ instructs the
inevitable Kaspar that, when the Count Palatine returns home, he must
‘tickle him behind, so that he should feel it in front’ (hinten zu kitzeln, dass
er es vorne fuhle). Kaspar conveys Golo’s order verbatim to the Count, and
the latter reproaches the unmasked rogue in the following terms, uttered
with the greatest pathos: ‘O Golo, Golo! thou hast told Kaspar to tickle me
behind, so that I shall feel it in front!’
From Grimma our party rode into Leipzig in open carriages, but not until
we had first carefully removed all the outward emblems of the
undergraduate, lest the local students we were likely to meet might make us
rue our presumption.
Since my first visit, when I was eight years old, I had only once returned
to Leipzig, and then for a very brief stay, and under circumstances very
similar to those of the earlier visit. I now renewed my fantastic impressions
of the Thome house, but this time, owing to my more advanced education, I
looked forward to more intelligent intercourse with my uncle Adolph. An
opening for this was soon provided by my joyous astonishment on learning
that a bookcase in the large anteroom, containing a goodly collection of
books, was my property, having been left me by my father. I went through
the books with my uncle, selected at once a number of Latin authors in the
handsome Zweibruck edition, along with sundry attractive looking works of
poetry and belles-lettres, and arranged for them to be sent to Dresden.
During this visit I was very much interested in the life of the students. In
addition to my impressions of the theatre and of Prague, now came those of
the so-called swaggering undergraduate. A great change had taken place in
this class. When, as a lad of eight, I had my first glimpse of students, their
long hair, their old German costume with the black velvet skull-cap and the
shirt collar turned back from the bare neck, had quite taken my fancy. But
Page 31
since that time the old student ‘associations’ which affected this fashion had
disappeared in the face of police prosecutions. On the other hand, the
national student clubs, no less peculiar to Germans, had become
conspicuous. These clubs adopted, more or less, the fashion of the day, but
with some little exaggeration. Albeit, their dress was clearly distinguishable
from that of other classes, owing to its picturesqueness, and especially its
display of the various club-colours. The ‘Comment,’ that compendium of
pedantic rules of conduct for the preservation of a defiant and exclusive
esprit de corps, as opposed to the bourgeois classes, had its fantastic side,
just as the most philistine peculiarities of the Germans have, if you probe
them deeply enough. To me it represented the idea of emancipation from
the yoke of school and family. The longing to become a student coincided
unfortunately with my growing dislike for drier studies and with my ever-
increasing fondness for cultivating romantic poetry. The results of this soon
showed themselves in my resolute attempts to make a change.
At the time of my confirmation, at Easter, 1827, I had considerable doubt
about this ceremony, and I already felt a serious falling off of my reverence
for religious observances. The boy who, not many years before, had gazed
with agonised sympathy on the altarpiece in the Kreuz Kirche (Church of
the Holy Cross), and had yearned with ecstatic fervour to hang upon the
Cross in place of the Saviour, had now so far lost his veneration for the
clergyman, whose preparatory confirmation classes he attended, as to be
quite ready to make fun of him, and even to join with his comrades in
withholding part of his class fees, and spending the money in sweets. How
matters stood with me spiritually was revealed to me, almost to my horror,
at the Communion service, when I walked in procession with my fellow-
communicants to the altar to the sound of organ and choir. The shudder with
which I received the Bread and Wine was so ineffaceably stamped on my
memory, that I never again partook of the Communion, lest I should do so
with levity. To avoid this was all the easier for me, seeing that among
Protestants such participation is not compulsory.
I soon, however, seized, or rather created, an opportunity of forcing a
breach with the Kreuz Grammar School, and thus compelled my family to
let me go to Leipzig. In self-defence against what I considered an unjust
punishment with which I was threatened by the assistant headmaster,
Baumgarten-Crusius, for whom I otherwise had great respect, I asked to be
discharged immediately from the school on the ground of sudden summons
disappeared in the face of police prosecutions. On the other hand, the
national student clubs, no less peculiar to Germans, had become
conspicuous. These clubs adopted, more or less, the fashion of the day, but
with some little exaggeration. Albeit, their dress was clearly distinguishable
from that of other classes, owing to its picturesqueness, and especially its
display of the various club-colours. The ‘Comment,’ that compendium of
pedantic rules of conduct for the preservation of a defiant and exclusive
esprit de corps, as opposed to the bourgeois classes, had its fantastic side,
just as the most philistine peculiarities of the Germans have, if you probe
them deeply enough. To me it represented the idea of emancipation from
the yoke of school and family. The longing to become a student coincided
unfortunately with my growing dislike for drier studies and with my ever-
increasing fondness for cultivating romantic poetry. The results of this soon
showed themselves in my resolute attempts to make a change.
At the time of my confirmation, at Easter, 1827, I had considerable doubt
about this ceremony, and I already felt a serious falling off of my reverence
for religious observances. The boy who, not many years before, had gazed
with agonised sympathy on the altarpiece in the Kreuz Kirche (Church of
the Holy Cross), and had yearned with ecstatic fervour to hang upon the
Cross in place of the Saviour, had now so far lost his veneration for the
clergyman, whose preparatory confirmation classes he attended, as to be
quite ready to make fun of him, and even to join with his comrades in
withholding part of his class fees, and spending the money in sweets. How
matters stood with me spiritually was revealed to me, almost to my horror,
at the Communion service, when I walked in procession with my fellow-
communicants to the altar to the sound of organ and choir. The shudder with
which I received the Bread and Wine was so ineffaceably stamped on my
memory, that I never again partook of the Communion, lest I should do so
with levity. To avoid this was all the easier for me, seeing that among
Protestants such participation is not compulsory.
I soon, however, seized, or rather created, an opportunity of forcing a
breach with the Kreuz Grammar School, and thus compelled my family to
let me go to Leipzig. In self-defence against what I considered an unjust
punishment with which I was threatened by the assistant headmaster,
Baumgarten-Crusius, for whom I otherwise had great respect, I asked to be
discharged immediately from the school on the ground of sudden summons
Page 32
to join my family in Leipzig. I had already left the Bohme household three
months before, and now lived alone in a small garret, where I was waited
on by the widow of a court plate-washer, who at every meal served up the
familiar thin Saxon coffee as almost my sole nourishment. In this attic I did
little else but write verses. Here, too, I formed the first outlines of that
stupendous tragedy which afterwards filled my family with such
consternation. The irregular habits I acquired through this premature
domestic independence induced my anxious mother to consent very readily
to my removal to Leipzig, the more so as a part of our scattered family had
already migrated there.
My longing for Leipzig, originally aroused by the fantastic impressions I
had gained there, and later by my enthusiasm for a student’s life, had
recently been still further stimulated. I had seen scarcely anything of my
sister Louisa, at that time a girl of about twenty-two, as she had gone to the
theatre of Breslau shortly after our stepfather’s death. Quite recently she
had been in Dresden for a few days on her way to Leipzig, having accepted
an engagement at the theatre there. This meeting with my almost unknown
sister, her hearty manifestations of joy at seeing me again, as well as her
sprightly, merry disposition, quite won my heart. To live with her seemed
an alluring prospect, especially as my mother and Ottilie had joined her for
a while. For the first time a sister had treated me with some tenderness.
When at last I reached Leipzig at Christmas in the same year (1827), and
there found my mother with Ottilie and Cecilia (my half-sister), I fancied
myself in heaven. Great changes, however, had already taken place. Louisa
was betrothed to a respected and well-to-do bookseller, Friedrich
Brockhaus. This gathering together of the relatives of the penniless bride-
elect did not seem to trouble her remarkably kind-hearted fiance. But my
sister may have become uneasy on the subject, for she soon gave me to
understand that she was not taking it quite in good part. Her desire to secure
an entree into the higher social circles of bourgeois life naturally produced a
marked change in her manner, at one time so full of fun, and of this I
gradually became so keenly sensible that finally we were estranged for a
time. Moreover, I unfortunately gave her good cause to reprove my
conduct. After I got to Leipzig I quite gave up my studies and all regular
school work, probably owing to the arbitrary and pedantic system in vogue
at the school there.
months before, and now lived alone in a small garret, where I was waited
on by the widow of a court plate-washer, who at every meal served up the
familiar thin Saxon coffee as almost my sole nourishment. In this attic I did
little else but write verses. Here, too, I formed the first outlines of that
stupendous tragedy which afterwards filled my family with such
consternation. The irregular habits I acquired through this premature
domestic independence induced my anxious mother to consent very readily
to my removal to Leipzig, the more so as a part of our scattered family had
already migrated there.
My longing for Leipzig, originally aroused by the fantastic impressions I
had gained there, and later by my enthusiasm for a student’s life, had
recently been still further stimulated. I had seen scarcely anything of my
sister Louisa, at that time a girl of about twenty-two, as she had gone to the
theatre of Breslau shortly after our stepfather’s death. Quite recently she
had been in Dresden for a few days on her way to Leipzig, having accepted
an engagement at the theatre there. This meeting with my almost unknown
sister, her hearty manifestations of joy at seeing me again, as well as her
sprightly, merry disposition, quite won my heart. To live with her seemed
an alluring prospect, especially as my mother and Ottilie had joined her for
a while. For the first time a sister had treated me with some tenderness.
When at last I reached Leipzig at Christmas in the same year (1827), and
there found my mother with Ottilie and Cecilia (my half-sister), I fancied
myself in heaven. Great changes, however, had already taken place. Louisa
was betrothed to a respected and well-to-do bookseller, Friedrich
Brockhaus. This gathering together of the relatives of the penniless bride-
elect did not seem to trouble her remarkably kind-hearted fiance. But my
sister may have become uneasy on the subject, for she soon gave me to
understand that she was not taking it quite in good part. Her desire to secure
an entree into the higher social circles of bourgeois life naturally produced a
marked change in her manner, at one time so full of fun, and of this I
gradually became so keenly sensible that finally we were estranged for a
time. Moreover, I unfortunately gave her good cause to reprove my
conduct. After I got to Leipzig I quite gave up my studies and all regular
school work, probably owing to the arbitrary and pedantic system in vogue
at the school there.
Page 33
In Leipzig there were two higher-class schools, one called St. Thomas’s
School, and the other, and the more modern, St. Nicholas’s School. The
latter at that time enjoyed a better reputation than the former; so there I had
to go. But the council of teachers before whom I appeared for my entrance
examination at the New Year (1828) thought fit to maintain the dignity of
their school by placing me for a time in the upper third form, whereas at the
Kreuz Grammar School in Dresden I had been in the second form. My
disgust at having to lay aside my Homer—from which I had already made
written translations of twelve songs—and take up the lighter Greek prose
writers was indescribable. It hurt my feelings so deeply, and so influenced
my behaviour, that I never made a friend of any teacher in the school. The
unsympathetic treatment I met with made me all the more obstinate, and
various other circumstances in my position only added to this feeling. While
student life, as I saw it day by day, inspired me ever more and more with its
rebellious spirit, I unexpectedly met with another cause for despising the
dry monotony of school regime. I refer to the influence of my uncle, Adolph
Wagner, which, though he was long unconscious of it, went a long way
towards moulding the growing stripling that I then was.
The fact that my romantic tastes were not based solely on a tendency to
superficial amusement was shown by my ardent attachment to this learned
relative. In his manner and conversation he was certainly very attractive;
the many-sidedness of his knowledge, which embraced not only philology
but also philosophy and general poetic literature, rendered intercourse with
him a most entertaining pastime, as all those who knew him used to admit.
On the other hand, the fact that he was denied the gift of writing with equal
charm, or clearness, was a singular defect which seriously lessened his
influence upon the literary world, and, in fact, often made him appear
ridiculous, as in a written argument he would perpetrate the most pompous
and involved sentences. This weakness could not have alarmed me, because
in the hazy period of my youth the more incomprehensible any literary
extravagance was, the more I admired it; besides which, I had more
experience of his conversation than of his writings. He also seemed to find
pleasure in associating with the lad who could listen with so much heart and
soul. Yet unfortunately, possibly in the fervour of his discourses, of which
he was not a little proud, he forgot that their substance, as well as their
form, was far above my youthful powers of comprehension. I called daily to
accompany him on his constitutional walk beyond the city gates, and I
School, and the other, and the more modern, St. Nicholas’s School. The
latter at that time enjoyed a better reputation than the former; so there I had
to go. But the council of teachers before whom I appeared for my entrance
examination at the New Year (1828) thought fit to maintain the dignity of
their school by placing me for a time in the upper third form, whereas at the
Kreuz Grammar School in Dresden I had been in the second form. My
disgust at having to lay aside my Homer—from which I had already made
written translations of twelve songs—and take up the lighter Greek prose
writers was indescribable. It hurt my feelings so deeply, and so influenced
my behaviour, that I never made a friend of any teacher in the school. The
unsympathetic treatment I met with made me all the more obstinate, and
various other circumstances in my position only added to this feeling. While
student life, as I saw it day by day, inspired me ever more and more with its
rebellious spirit, I unexpectedly met with another cause for despising the
dry monotony of school regime. I refer to the influence of my uncle, Adolph
Wagner, which, though he was long unconscious of it, went a long way
towards moulding the growing stripling that I then was.
The fact that my romantic tastes were not based solely on a tendency to
superficial amusement was shown by my ardent attachment to this learned
relative. In his manner and conversation he was certainly very attractive;
the many-sidedness of his knowledge, which embraced not only philology
but also philosophy and general poetic literature, rendered intercourse with
him a most entertaining pastime, as all those who knew him used to admit.
On the other hand, the fact that he was denied the gift of writing with equal
charm, or clearness, was a singular defect which seriously lessened his
influence upon the literary world, and, in fact, often made him appear
ridiculous, as in a written argument he would perpetrate the most pompous
and involved sentences. This weakness could not have alarmed me, because
in the hazy period of my youth the more incomprehensible any literary
extravagance was, the more I admired it; besides which, I had more
experience of his conversation than of his writings. He also seemed to find
pleasure in associating with the lad who could listen with so much heart and
soul. Yet unfortunately, possibly in the fervour of his discourses, of which
he was not a little proud, he forgot that their substance, as well as their
form, was far above my youthful powers of comprehension. I called daily to
accompany him on his constitutional walk beyond the city gates, and I
Page 34
shrewdly suspect that we often provoked the smiles of those passers-by who
overheard the profound and often earnest discussions between us. The
subjects generally ranged over everything serious or sublime throughout the
whole realm of knowledge. I took the most enthusiastic interest in his
copious library, and tasted eagerly of almost all branches of literature,
without really grounding myself in any one of them.
My uncle was delighted to find in me a very willing listener to his recital
of classic tragedies. He had made a translation of Oedipus, and, according
to his intimate friend Tieck, justly flattered himself on being an excellent
reader.
I remember once, when he was sitting at his desk reading out a Greek
tragedy to me, it did not annoy him when I fell fast asleep, and he
afterwards pretended he had not noticed it. I was also induced to spend my
evenings with him, owing to the friendly and genial hospitality his wife
showed me. A very great change had come over my uncle’s life since my
first acquaintance with him at Jeannette Thome’s. The home which he,
together with his sister Friederike, had found in his friend’s house seemed,
as time went on, to have brought in its train duties that were irksome. As his
literary work assured him a modest income, he eventually deemed it more
in accordance with his dignity to make a home of his own. A friend of his,
of the same age as himself, the sister of the aesthete Wendt of Leipzig, who
afterwards became famous, was chosen by him to keep house for him.
Without saying a word to Jeannette, instead of going for his usual afternoon
walk he went to the church with his chosen bride, and got through the
marriage ceremonies as quickly as possible; and it was only on his return
that he informed us he was leaving, and would have his things removed that
very day. He managed to meet the consternation, perhaps also the
reproaches, of his elderly friend with quiet composure; and to the end of his
life he continued his regular daily visits to ‘Mam’selle Thome,’ who at
times would coyly pretend to sulk. It was only poor Friederike who seemed
obliged at times to atone for her brother’s sudden unfaithfulness.
What attracted me in my uncle most strongly was his blunt contempt of
the modern pedantry in State, Church, and School, to which he gave vent
with some humour. Despite the great moderation of his usual views on life,
he yet produced on me the effect of a thorough free-thinker. I was highly
delighted by his contempt for the pedantry of the schools. Once, when I had
overheard the profound and often earnest discussions between us. The
subjects generally ranged over everything serious or sublime throughout the
whole realm of knowledge. I took the most enthusiastic interest in his
copious library, and tasted eagerly of almost all branches of literature,
without really grounding myself in any one of them.
My uncle was delighted to find in me a very willing listener to his recital
of classic tragedies. He had made a translation of Oedipus, and, according
to his intimate friend Tieck, justly flattered himself on being an excellent
reader.
I remember once, when he was sitting at his desk reading out a Greek
tragedy to me, it did not annoy him when I fell fast asleep, and he
afterwards pretended he had not noticed it. I was also induced to spend my
evenings with him, owing to the friendly and genial hospitality his wife
showed me. A very great change had come over my uncle’s life since my
first acquaintance with him at Jeannette Thome’s. The home which he,
together with his sister Friederike, had found in his friend’s house seemed,
as time went on, to have brought in its train duties that were irksome. As his
literary work assured him a modest income, he eventually deemed it more
in accordance with his dignity to make a home of his own. A friend of his,
of the same age as himself, the sister of the aesthete Wendt of Leipzig, who
afterwards became famous, was chosen by him to keep house for him.
Without saying a word to Jeannette, instead of going for his usual afternoon
walk he went to the church with his chosen bride, and got through the
marriage ceremonies as quickly as possible; and it was only on his return
that he informed us he was leaving, and would have his things removed that
very day. He managed to meet the consternation, perhaps also the
reproaches, of his elderly friend with quiet composure; and to the end of his
life he continued his regular daily visits to ‘Mam’selle Thome,’ who at
times would coyly pretend to sulk. It was only poor Friederike who seemed
obliged at times to atone for her brother’s sudden unfaithfulness.
What attracted me in my uncle most strongly was his blunt contempt of
the modern pedantry in State, Church, and School, to which he gave vent
with some humour. Despite the great moderation of his usual views on life,
he yet produced on me the effect of a thorough free-thinker. I was highly
delighted by his contempt for the pedantry of the schools. Once, when I had
Page 35
come into serious conflict with all the teachers of the Nicolai School, and
the rector of the school had approached my uncle, as the only male
representative of my family, with a serious complaint about my behaviour,
my uncle asked me during a stroll round the town, with a calm smile as
though he were speaking to one of his own age, what I had been up to with
the people at school. I explained the whole affair to him, and described the
punishment to which I had been subjected, and which seemed to me unjust.
He pacified me, and exhorted me to be patient, telling me to comfort myself
with the Spanish proverb, un rey no puede morir, which he explained as
meaning that the ruler of a school must of necessity always be in the right.
He could not, of course, help noticing, to his alarm, the effect upon me of
this kind of conversation, which I was far too young to appreciate. Although
it annoyed me one day, when I wanted to begin reading Goethe’s Faust, to
hear him say quietly that I was too young to understand it, yet, according to
my thinking, his other conversations about our own great poets, and even
about Shakespeare and Dante, had made me so familiar with these sublime
figures that I had now for some time been secretly busy working out the
great tragedy I had already conceived in Dresden. Since my trouble at
school I had devoted all my energies, which ought by rights to have been
exclusively directed to my school duties, to the accomplishment of this task.
In this secret work I had only one confidante, my sister Ottilie, who now
lived with me at my mother’s. I can remember the misgivings and alarm
which the first confidential communication of my great poetic enterprise
aroused in my good sister; yet she affectionately suffered the tortures I
sometimes inflicted on her by reciting to her in secret, but not without
emotion, portions of my work as it progressed. Once, when I was reciting to
her one of the most gruesome scenes, a heavy thunderstorm came on. When
the lightning flashed quite close to us, and the thunder rolled, my sister felt
bound to implore me to stop; but she soon found it was hopeless, and
continued to endure it with touching devotion.
But a more significant storm was brewing on the horizon of my life. My
neglect of school reached such a point that it could not but lead to a rupture.
Whilst my dear mother had no presentiment of this, I awaited the
catastrophe with longing rather than with fear.
In order to meet this crisis with dignity I at length decided to surprise my
family by disclosing to them the secret of my tragedy, which was now
the rector of the school had approached my uncle, as the only male
representative of my family, with a serious complaint about my behaviour,
my uncle asked me during a stroll round the town, with a calm smile as
though he were speaking to one of his own age, what I had been up to with
the people at school. I explained the whole affair to him, and described the
punishment to which I had been subjected, and which seemed to me unjust.
He pacified me, and exhorted me to be patient, telling me to comfort myself
with the Spanish proverb, un rey no puede morir, which he explained as
meaning that the ruler of a school must of necessity always be in the right.
He could not, of course, help noticing, to his alarm, the effect upon me of
this kind of conversation, which I was far too young to appreciate. Although
it annoyed me one day, when I wanted to begin reading Goethe’s Faust, to
hear him say quietly that I was too young to understand it, yet, according to
my thinking, his other conversations about our own great poets, and even
about Shakespeare and Dante, had made me so familiar with these sublime
figures that I had now for some time been secretly busy working out the
great tragedy I had already conceived in Dresden. Since my trouble at
school I had devoted all my energies, which ought by rights to have been
exclusively directed to my school duties, to the accomplishment of this task.
In this secret work I had only one confidante, my sister Ottilie, who now
lived with me at my mother’s. I can remember the misgivings and alarm
which the first confidential communication of my great poetic enterprise
aroused in my good sister; yet she affectionately suffered the tortures I
sometimes inflicted on her by reciting to her in secret, but not without
emotion, portions of my work as it progressed. Once, when I was reciting to
her one of the most gruesome scenes, a heavy thunderstorm came on. When
the lightning flashed quite close to us, and the thunder rolled, my sister felt
bound to implore me to stop; but she soon found it was hopeless, and
continued to endure it with touching devotion.
But a more significant storm was brewing on the horizon of my life. My
neglect of school reached such a point that it could not but lead to a rupture.
Whilst my dear mother had no presentiment of this, I awaited the
catastrophe with longing rather than with fear.
In order to meet this crisis with dignity I at length decided to surprise my
family by disclosing to them the secret of my tragedy, which was now
Page 36
completed. They were to be informed of this great event by my uncle. I
thought I could rely upon his hearty recognition of my vocation as a great
poet on account of the deep harmony between us on all other questions of
life, science, and art. I therefore sent him my voluminous manuscript, with
a long letter which I thought would please him immensely. In this I
communicated to him first my ideas with regard to the St. Nicholas’s
School, and then my firm determination from that time forward not to allow
any mere school pedantry to check my free development. But the event
turned out very different from what I had expected. It was a great shock to
them. My uncle, quite conscious that he had been indiscreet, paid a visit to
my mother and brother-in-law, in order to report the misfortune that had
befallen the family, reproaching himself for the fact that his influence over
me had not always, perhaps, been for my good. To me he wrote a serious
letter of discouragement; and to this day I cannot understand why he
showed so small a sense of humour in understanding my bad behaviour. To
my surprise he merely said that he reproached himself for having corrupted
me by conversations unsuited to my years, but he made no attempt to
explain to me good-naturedly the error of my ways.
The crime this boy of fifteen had committed was, as I said before, to have
written a great tragedy, entitled Leubald und Adelaïde.
The manuscript of this drama has unfortunately been lost, but I can still
see it clearly in my mind’s eye. The handwriting was most affected, and the
backward-sloping tall letters with which I had aimed at giving it an air of
distinction had already been compared by one of my teachers to Persian
hieroglyphics. In this composition I had constructed a drama in which I had
drawn largely upon Shakespeare’s Hamlet, King Lear, and Macbeth, and
Goethe’s Götz van Berlichingen. The plot was really based on a
modification of Hamlet, the difference consisting in the fact that my hero is
so completely carried away by the appearance of the ghost of his father,
who has been murdered under similar circumstances, and demands
vengeance, that he is driven to fearful deeds of violence; and, with a series
of murders on his conscience, he eventually goes mad. Leubald, whose
character is a mixture of Hamlet and Harry Hotspur, had promised his
father’s ghost to wipe from the face of the earth the whole race of Roderick,
as the ruthless murderer of the best of fathers was named. After having slain
Roderick himself in mortal combat, and subsequently all his sons and other
relations who supported him, there was only one obstacle that prevented
thought I could rely upon his hearty recognition of my vocation as a great
poet on account of the deep harmony between us on all other questions of
life, science, and art. I therefore sent him my voluminous manuscript, with
a long letter which I thought would please him immensely. In this I
communicated to him first my ideas with regard to the St. Nicholas’s
School, and then my firm determination from that time forward not to allow
any mere school pedantry to check my free development. But the event
turned out very different from what I had expected. It was a great shock to
them. My uncle, quite conscious that he had been indiscreet, paid a visit to
my mother and brother-in-law, in order to report the misfortune that had
befallen the family, reproaching himself for the fact that his influence over
me had not always, perhaps, been for my good. To me he wrote a serious
letter of discouragement; and to this day I cannot understand why he
showed so small a sense of humour in understanding my bad behaviour. To
my surprise he merely said that he reproached himself for having corrupted
me by conversations unsuited to my years, but he made no attempt to
explain to me good-naturedly the error of my ways.
The crime this boy of fifteen had committed was, as I said before, to have
written a great tragedy, entitled Leubald und Adelaïde.
The manuscript of this drama has unfortunately been lost, but I can still
see it clearly in my mind’s eye. The handwriting was most affected, and the
backward-sloping tall letters with which I had aimed at giving it an air of
distinction had already been compared by one of my teachers to Persian
hieroglyphics. In this composition I had constructed a drama in which I had
drawn largely upon Shakespeare’s Hamlet, King Lear, and Macbeth, and
Goethe’s Götz van Berlichingen. The plot was really based on a
modification of Hamlet, the difference consisting in the fact that my hero is
so completely carried away by the appearance of the ghost of his father,
who has been murdered under similar circumstances, and demands
vengeance, that he is driven to fearful deeds of violence; and, with a series
of murders on his conscience, he eventually goes mad. Leubald, whose
character is a mixture of Hamlet and Harry Hotspur, had promised his
father’s ghost to wipe from the face of the earth the whole race of Roderick,
as the ruthless murderer of the best of fathers was named. After having slain
Roderick himself in mortal combat, and subsequently all his sons and other
relations who supported him, there was only one obstacle that prevented
Page 37
Leubald from fulfilling the dearest wish of his heart, which was to be united
in death with the shade of his father: a child of Roderick’s was still alive.
During the storming of his castle the murderer’s daughter had been carried
away into safety by a faithful suitor, whom she, however, detested. I had an
irresistible impulse to call this maiden ‘Adelaïde.’ As even at that early age
I was a great enthusiast for everything really German, I can only account
for the obviously un-German name of my heroine by my infatuation for
Beethoven’s Adelaïde, whose tender refrain seemed to me the symbol of all
loving appeals. The course of my drama was now characterised by the
strange delays which took place in the accomplishment of this last murder
of vengeance, the chief obstacle to which lay in the sudden passionate love
which arose between Leubald and Adelaïde. I succeeded in representing the
birth and avowal of this love by means of extraordinary adventures.
Adelaïde was once more stolen away by a robber-knight from the lover who
had been sheltering her. After Leubald had thereupon sacrificed the lover
and all his relations, he hastened to the robber’s castle, driven thither less by
a thirst for blood than by a longing for death. For this reason he regrets his
inability to storm the robber’s castle forthwith, because it is well defended,
and, moreover, night is fast falling; he is therefore obliged to pitch his tent.
After raving for a while he sinks down for the first time exhausted, but
being urged, like his prototype Hamlet, by the spirit of his father to
complete his vow of vengeance, he himself suddenly falls into the power of
the enemy during a night assault. In the subterranean dungeons of the castle
he meets Roderick’s daughter for the first time. She is a prisoner like
himself, and is craftily devising flight. Under circumstances in which she
produces on him the impression of a heavenly vision, she makes her
appearance before him. They fall in love, and fly together into the
wilderness, where they realise that they are deadly enemies. The incipient
insanity which was already noticeable in Leubald breaks out more violently
after this discovery, and everything that can be done to intensify it is
contributed by the ghost of his father, which continually comes between the
advances of the lovers. But this ghost is not the only disturber of the
conciliating love of Leubald and Adelaïde. The ghost of Roderick also
appears, and according to the method followed by Shakespeare in Richard
III., he is joined by the ghosts of all the other members of Adelaïde’s family
whom Leubald has slain. From the incessant importunities of these ghosts
Leubald seeks to free himself by means of sorcery, and calls to his aid a
in death with the shade of his father: a child of Roderick’s was still alive.
During the storming of his castle the murderer’s daughter had been carried
away into safety by a faithful suitor, whom she, however, detested. I had an
irresistible impulse to call this maiden ‘Adelaïde.’ As even at that early age
I was a great enthusiast for everything really German, I can only account
for the obviously un-German name of my heroine by my infatuation for
Beethoven’s Adelaïde, whose tender refrain seemed to me the symbol of all
loving appeals. The course of my drama was now characterised by the
strange delays which took place in the accomplishment of this last murder
of vengeance, the chief obstacle to which lay in the sudden passionate love
which arose between Leubald and Adelaïde. I succeeded in representing the
birth and avowal of this love by means of extraordinary adventures.
Adelaïde was once more stolen away by a robber-knight from the lover who
had been sheltering her. After Leubald had thereupon sacrificed the lover
and all his relations, he hastened to the robber’s castle, driven thither less by
a thirst for blood than by a longing for death. For this reason he regrets his
inability to storm the robber’s castle forthwith, because it is well defended,
and, moreover, night is fast falling; he is therefore obliged to pitch his tent.
After raving for a while he sinks down for the first time exhausted, but
being urged, like his prototype Hamlet, by the spirit of his father to
complete his vow of vengeance, he himself suddenly falls into the power of
the enemy during a night assault. In the subterranean dungeons of the castle
he meets Roderick’s daughter for the first time. She is a prisoner like
himself, and is craftily devising flight. Under circumstances in which she
produces on him the impression of a heavenly vision, she makes her
appearance before him. They fall in love, and fly together into the
wilderness, where they realise that they are deadly enemies. The incipient
insanity which was already noticeable in Leubald breaks out more violently
after this discovery, and everything that can be done to intensify it is
contributed by the ghost of his father, which continually comes between the
advances of the lovers. But this ghost is not the only disturber of the
conciliating love of Leubald and Adelaïde. The ghost of Roderick also
appears, and according to the method followed by Shakespeare in Richard
III., he is joined by the ghosts of all the other members of Adelaïde’s family
whom Leubald has slain. From the incessant importunities of these ghosts
Leubald seeks to free himself by means of sorcery, and calls to his aid a
Page 38
rascal named Flamming. One of Macbeth’s witches is summoned to lay the
ghosts; as she is unable to do this efficiently, the furious Leubald sends her
also to the devil; but with her dying breath she despatches the whole crowd
of spirits who serve her to join the ghosts of those already pursuing him.
Leubald, tormented beyond endurance, and now at last raving mad, turns
against his beloved, who is the apparent cause of all his misery. He stabs
her in his fury; then finding himself suddenly at peace, he sinks his head
into her lap, and accepts her last caresses as her life-blood streams over his
own dying body.
I had not omitted the smallest detail that could give this plot its proper
colouring, and had drawn on all my knowledge of the tales of the old
knights, and my acquaintance with Lear and Macbeth, to furnish my drama
with the most vivid situations. But one of the chief characteristics of its
poetical form I took from the pathetic, humorous, and powerful language of
Shakespeare. The boldness of my grandiloquent and bombastic expressions
roused my uncle Adolph’s alarm and astonishment. He was unable to
understand how I could have selected and used with inconceivable
exaggeration precisely the most extravagant forms of speech to be found in
Lear and Götz von Berlichingen. Nevertheless, even after everybody had
deafened me with their laments over my lost time and perverted talents, I
was still conscious of a wonderful secret solace in the face of the calamity
that had befallen me. I knew, a fact that no one else could know, namely,
that my work could only be rightly judged when set to the music which I
had resolved to write for it, and which I intended to start composing
immediately.
I must now explain my position with respect to music hitherto. For this
purpose I must go back to my earliest attempts in the art. In my family two
of my sisters were musical; the elder one, Rosalie, played the piano,
without, however, displaying any marked talent. Clara was more gifted; in
addition to a great deal of musical feeling, and a fine rich touch on the
piano, she possessed a particularly sympathetic voice, the development of
which was so premature and remarkable that, under the tuition of Mieksch,
her singing master, who was famous at that time, she was apparently ready
for the role of a prima donna as early as her sixteenth year, and made her
debut at Dresden in Italian opera as ‘Cenerentola’ in Rossini’s opera of that
name. Incidentally I may remark that this premature development proved
injurious to Clara’s voice, and was detrimental to her whole career. As I
ghosts; as she is unable to do this efficiently, the furious Leubald sends her
also to the devil; but with her dying breath she despatches the whole crowd
of spirits who serve her to join the ghosts of those already pursuing him.
Leubald, tormented beyond endurance, and now at last raving mad, turns
against his beloved, who is the apparent cause of all his misery. He stabs
her in his fury; then finding himself suddenly at peace, he sinks his head
into her lap, and accepts her last caresses as her life-blood streams over his
own dying body.
I had not omitted the smallest detail that could give this plot its proper
colouring, and had drawn on all my knowledge of the tales of the old
knights, and my acquaintance with Lear and Macbeth, to furnish my drama
with the most vivid situations. But one of the chief characteristics of its
poetical form I took from the pathetic, humorous, and powerful language of
Shakespeare. The boldness of my grandiloquent and bombastic expressions
roused my uncle Adolph’s alarm and astonishment. He was unable to
understand how I could have selected and used with inconceivable
exaggeration precisely the most extravagant forms of speech to be found in
Lear and Götz von Berlichingen. Nevertheless, even after everybody had
deafened me with their laments over my lost time and perverted talents, I
was still conscious of a wonderful secret solace in the face of the calamity
that had befallen me. I knew, a fact that no one else could know, namely,
that my work could only be rightly judged when set to the music which I
had resolved to write for it, and which I intended to start composing
immediately.
I must now explain my position with respect to music hitherto. For this
purpose I must go back to my earliest attempts in the art. In my family two
of my sisters were musical; the elder one, Rosalie, played the piano,
without, however, displaying any marked talent. Clara was more gifted; in
addition to a great deal of musical feeling, and a fine rich touch on the
piano, she possessed a particularly sympathetic voice, the development of
which was so premature and remarkable that, under the tuition of Mieksch,
her singing master, who was famous at that time, she was apparently ready
for the role of a prima donna as early as her sixteenth year, and made her
debut at Dresden in Italian opera as ‘Cenerentola’ in Rossini’s opera of that
name. Incidentally I may remark that this premature development proved
injurious to Clara’s voice, and was detrimental to her whole career. As I
Page 39
have said, music was represented in our family by these two sisters. It was
chiefly owing to Clara’s career that the musical conductor C. M. von Weber
often came to our house. His visits were varied by those of the great male-
soprano Sassaroli; and in addition to these two representatives of German
and Italian music, we also had the company of Mieksch, her singing master.
It was on these occasions that I as a child first heard German and Italian
music discussed, and learnt that any one who wished to ingratiate himself
with the Court must show a preference for Italian music, a fact which led to
very practical results in our family council. Clara’s talent, while her voice
was still sound, was the object of competition between the representatives
of Italian and German opera. I can remember quite distinctly that from the
very beginning I declared myself in favour of German opera; my choice
was determined by the tremendous impression made on me by the two
figures of Sassaroli and Weber. The Italian male-soprano, a huge pot-bellied
giant, horrified me with his high effeminate voice, his astonishing
volubility, and his incessant screeching laughter. In spite of his boundless
good-nature and amiability, particularly to my family, I took an uncanny
dislike to him. On account of this dreadful person, the sound of Italian,
either spoken or sung, seemed to my ears almost diabolical; and when, in
consequence of my poor sister’s misfortune, I heard them often talking
about Italian intrigues and cabals, I conceived so strong a dislike for
everything connected with this nation that even in much later years I used to
feel myself carried away by an impulse of utter detestation and abhorrence.
The less frequent visits of Weber, on the other hand, seemed to have
produced upon me those first sympathetic impressions which I have never
since lost. In contrast to Sassaroli’s repulsive figure, Weber’s really refined,
delicate, and intellectual appearance excited my ecstatic admiration. His
narrow face and finely-cut features, his vivacious though often half-closed
eyes, captivated and thrilled me; whilst even the bad limp with which he
walked, and which I often noticed from our windows when the master was
making his way home past our house from the fatiguing rehearsals, stamped
the great musician in my imagination as an exceptional and almost
superhuman being. When, as a boy of nine, my mother introduced me to
him, and he asked me what I was going to be, whether I wanted perhaps to
be a musician, my mother told him that, though I was indeed quite mad on
Freischutz, yet she had as yet seen nothing in me which indicated any
musical talent.
chiefly owing to Clara’s career that the musical conductor C. M. von Weber
often came to our house. His visits were varied by those of the great male-
soprano Sassaroli; and in addition to these two representatives of German
and Italian music, we also had the company of Mieksch, her singing master.
It was on these occasions that I as a child first heard German and Italian
music discussed, and learnt that any one who wished to ingratiate himself
with the Court must show a preference for Italian music, a fact which led to
very practical results in our family council. Clara’s talent, while her voice
was still sound, was the object of competition between the representatives
of Italian and German opera. I can remember quite distinctly that from the
very beginning I declared myself in favour of German opera; my choice
was determined by the tremendous impression made on me by the two
figures of Sassaroli and Weber. The Italian male-soprano, a huge pot-bellied
giant, horrified me with his high effeminate voice, his astonishing
volubility, and his incessant screeching laughter. In spite of his boundless
good-nature and amiability, particularly to my family, I took an uncanny
dislike to him. On account of this dreadful person, the sound of Italian,
either spoken or sung, seemed to my ears almost diabolical; and when, in
consequence of my poor sister’s misfortune, I heard them often talking
about Italian intrigues and cabals, I conceived so strong a dislike for
everything connected with this nation that even in much later years I used to
feel myself carried away by an impulse of utter detestation and abhorrence.
The less frequent visits of Weber, on the other hand, seemed to have
produced upon me those first sympathetic impressions which I have never
since lost. In contrast to Sassaroli’s repulsive figure, Weber’s really refined,
delicate, and intellectual appearance excited my ecstatic admiration. His
narrow face and finely-cut features, his vivacious though often half-closed
eyes, captivated and thrilled me; whilst even the bad limp with which he
walked, and which I often noticed from our windows when the master was
making his way home past our house from the fatiguing rehearsals, stamped
the great musician in my imagination as an exceptional and almost
superhuman being. When, as a boy of nine, my mother introduced me to
him, and he asked me what I was going to be, whether I wanted perhaps to
be a musician, my mother told him that, though I was indeed quite mad on
Freischutz, yet she had as yet seen nothing in me which indicated any
musical talent.
Page 40
This showed correct observation on my mother’s part; nothing had made
so great an impression on me as the music of Freischutz, and I tried in every
possible way to procure a repetition of the impressions I had received from
it, but, strange to say, least of all by the study of music itself. Instead of this,
I contented myself with hearing bits from Freischutz played by my sisters.
Yet my passion for it gradually grew so strong that I can remember taking a
particular fancy for a young man called Spiess, chiefly because he could
play the overture to Freischutz, which I used to ask him to do whenever I
met him. It was chiefly the introduction to this overture which at last led me
to attempt, without ever having received any instruction on the piano, to
play this piece in my own peculiar way, for, oddly enough, I was the only
child in our family who had not been given music lessons. This was
probably due to my mother’s anxiety to keep me away from any artistic
interests of this kind in case they might arouse in me a longing for the
theatre.
When I was about twelve years old, however, my mother engaged a tutor
for me named Humann, from whom I received regular music lessons,
though only of a very mediocre description. As soon as I had acquired a
very imperfect knowledge of fingering I begged to be allowed to play
overtures in the form of duets, always keeping Weber as the goal of my
ambition. When at length I had got so far as to be able to play the overture
to Freischutz myself, though in a very faulty manner, I felt the object of my
study had been attained, and I had no inclination to devote any further
attention to perfecting my technique.
Yet I had attained this much: I was no longer dependent for music on the
playing of others; from this time forth I used to try and play, albeit very
imperfectly, everything I wanted to know. I also tried Mozart’s Don Juan,
but was unable to get any pleasure out of it, mainly because the Italian text
in the arrangement for the piano placed the music in a frivolous light in my
eyes, and much in it seemed to me trivial and unmanly. (I can remember
that when my sister used to sing Zerlinen’s ariette, Batti, batti, ben Masetto,
the music repelled me, as it seemed so mawkish and effeminate.)
On the other hand, my bent for music grew stronger and stronger, and I
now tried to possess myself of my favourite pieces by making my own
copies. I can remember the hesitation with which my mother for the first
so great an impression on me as the music of Freischutz, and I tried in every
possible way to procure a repetition of the impressions I had received from
it, but, strange to say, least of all by the study of music itself. Instead of this,
I contented myself with hearing bits from Freischutz played by my sisters.
Yet my passion for it gradually grew so strong that I can remember taking a
particular fancy for a young man called Spiess, chiefly because he could
play the overture to Freischutz, which I used to ask him to do whenever I
met him. It was chiefly the introduction to this overture which at last led me
to attempt, without ever having received any instruction on the piano, to
play this piece in my own peculiar way, for, oddly enough, I was the only
child in our family who had not been given music lessons. This was
probably due to my mother’s anxiety to keep me away from any artistic
interests of this kind in case they might arouse in me a longing for the
theatre.
When I was about twelve years old, however, my mother engaged a tutor
for me named Humann, from whom I received regular music lessons,
though only of a very mediocre description. As soon as I had acquired a
very imperfect knowledge of fingering I begged to be allowed to play
overtures in the form of duets, always keeping Weber as the goal of my
ambition. When at length I had got so far as to be able to play the overture
to Freischutz myself, though in a very faulty manner, I felt the object of my
study had been attained, and I had no inclination to devote any further
attention to perfecting my technique.
Yet I had attained this much: I was no longer dependent for music on the
playing of others; from this time forth I used to try and play, albeit very
imperfectly, everything I wanted to know. I also tried Mozart’s Don Juan,
but was unable to get any pleasure out of it, mainly because the Italian text
in the arrangement for the piano placed the music in a frivolous light in my
eyes, and much in it seemed to me trivial and unmanly. (I can remember
that when my sister used to sing Zerlinen’s ariette, Batti, batti, ben Masetto,
the music repelled me, as it seemed so mawkish and effeminate.)
On the other hand, my bent for music grew stronger and stronger, and I
now tried to possess myself of my favourite pieces by making my own
copies. I can remember the hesitation with which my mother for the first
Page 41
time gave me the money to buy the scored paper on which I copied out
Weber’s Lutzow’s Jagd, which was the first piece of music I transcribed.
Music was still a secondary occupation with me when the news of
Weber’s death and the longing to learn his music to Oberon fanned my
enthusiasm into flame again. This received fresh impetus from the
afternoon concerts in the Grosser Garten at Dresden, where I often heard
my favourite music played by Zillmann’s Town Band, as I thought,
exceedingly well. The mysterious joy I felt in hearing an orchestra play
quite close to me still remains one of my most pleasant memories. The mere
tuning up of the instruments put me in a state of mystic excitement; even
the striking of fifths on the violin seemed to me like a greeting from the
spirit world—which, I may mention incidentally, had a very real meaning
for me. When I was still almost a baby, the sound of these fifths, which has
always excited me, was closely associated in my mind with ghosts and
spirits. I remember that even much later in life I could never pass the small
palace of Prince Anthony, at the end of the Ostra Allee in Dresden, without
a shudder; for it was there I had first heard the sound of a violin, a very
common experience to me afterwards. It was close by me, and seemed to
my ears to come from the stone figures with which this palace is adorned,
some of which are provided with musical instruments. When I took up my
post as musical conductor at Dresden, and had to pay my official visit to
Morgenroth, the President of the Concert Committee, an elderly gentleman
who lived for many years opposite that princely palace, it seemed odd to
find that the player of fifths who had so strongly impressed my musical
fancy as a boy was anything but a supernatural spectre. And when I saw the
well-known picture in which a skeleton plays on his violin to an old man on
his deathbed, the ghostly character of those very notes impressed itself with
particular force upon my childish imagination. When at last, as a young
man, I used to listen to the Zillmann Orchestra in the Grosser Garten almost
every afternoon, one may imagine the rapturous thrill with which I drew in
all the chaotic variety of sound that I heard as the orchestra tuned up: the
long drawn A of the oboe, which seemed like a call from the dead to rouse
the other instruments, never failed to raise all my nerves to a feverish pitch
of tension, and when the swelling C in the overture to Freischutz told me
that I had stepped, as it were with both feet, right into the magic realm of
awe. Any one who had been watching me at that moment could hardly have
Weber’s Lutzow’s Jagd, which was the first piece of music I transcribed.
Music was still a secondary occupation with me when the news of
Weber’s death and the longing to learn his music to Oberon fanned my
enthusiasm into flame again. This received fresh impetus from the
afternoon concerts in the Grosser Garten at Dresden, where I often heard
my favourite music played by Zillmann’s Town Band, as I thought,
exceedingly well. The mysterious joy I felt in hearing an orchestra play
quite close to me still remains one of my most pleasant memories. The mere
tuning up of the instruments put me in a state of mystic excitement; even
the striking of fifths on the violin seemed to me like a greeting from the
spirit world—which, I may mention incidentally, had a very real meaning
for me. When I was still almost a baby, the sound of these fifths, which has
always excited me, was closely associated in my mind with ghosts and
spirits. I remember that even much later in life I could never pass the small
palace of Prince Anthony, at the end of the Ostra Allee in Dresden, without
a shudder; for it was there I had first heard the sound of a violin, a very
common experience to me afterwards. It was close by me, and seemed to
my ears to come from the stone figures with which this palace is adorned,
some of which are provided with musical instruments. When I took up my
post as musical conductor at Dresden, and had to pay my official visit to
Morgenroth, the President of the Concert Committee, an elderly gentleman
who lived for many years opposite that princely palace, it seemed odd to
find that the player of fifths who had so strongly impressed my musical
fancy as a boy was anything but a supernatural spectre. And when I saw the
well-known picture in which a skeleton plays on his violin to an old man on
his deathbed, the ghostly character of those very notes impressed itself with
particular force upon my childish imagination. When at last, as a young
man, I used to listen to the Zillmann Orchestra in the Grosser Garten almost
every afternoon, one may imagine the rapturous thrill with which I drew in
all the chaotic variety of sound that I heard as the orchestra tuned up: the
long drawn A of the oboe, which seemed like a call from the dead to rouse
the other instruments, never failed to raise all my nerves to a feverish pitch
of tension, and when the swelling C in the overture to Freischutz told me
that I had stepped, as it were with both feet, right into the magic realm of
awe. Any one who had been watching me at that moment could hardly have
Page 42
failed to see the state I was in, and this in spite of the fact that I was such a
bad performer on the piano.
Another work also exercised a great fascination over me, namely, the
overture to Fidelio in E major, the introduction to which affected me deeply.
I asked my sisters about Beethoven, and learned that the news of his death
had just arrived. Obsessed as I still was by the terrible grief caused by
Weber’s death, this fresh loss, due to the decease of this great master of
melody, who had only just entered my life, filled me with strange anguish, a
feeling nearly akin to my childish dread of the ghostly fifths on the violin. It
was now Beethoven’s music that I longed to know more thoroughly; I came
to Leipzig, and found his music to Egmont on the piano at my sister
Louisa’s. After that I tried to get hold of his sonatas. At last, at a concert at
the Gewandthaus, I heard one of the master’s symphonies for the first time;
it was the Symphony in A major. The effect on me was indescribable. To
this must be added the impression produced on me by Beethoven’s features,
which I saw in the lithographs that were circulated everywhere at that time,
and by the fact that he was deaf, and lived a quiet secluded life. I soon
conceived an image of him in my mind as a sublime and unique
supernatural being, with whom none could compare. This image was
associated in my brain with that of Shakespeare; in ecstatic dreams I met
both of them, saw and spoke to them, and on awakening found myself
bathed in tears.
It was at this time that I came across Mozart’s Requiem, which formed
the starting-point of my enthusiastic absorption in the works of that master.
His second finale to Don Juan inspired me to include him in my spirit
world.
I was now filled with a desire to compose, as I had before been to write
verse. I had, however, in this case to master the technique of an entirely
separate and complicated subject. This presented greater difficulties than I
had met with in writing verse, which came to me fairly easily. It was these
difficulties that drove me to adopt a career which bore some resemblance to
that of a professional musician, whose future distinction would be to win
the titles of Conductor and Writer of Opera.
I now wanted to set Leubald und Adelaïde to music, similar to that which
Beethoven wrote to Goethe’s Egmont; the various ghosts from the spirit
world, who were each to display different characteristics, were to borrow
bad performer on the piano.
Another work also exercised a great fascination over me, namely, the
overture to Fidelio in E major, the introduction to which affected me deeply.
I asked my sisters about Beethoven, and learned that the news of his death
had just arrived. Obsessed as I still was by the terrible grief caused by
Weber’s death, this fresh loss, due to the decease of this great master of
melody, who had only just entered my life, filled me with strange anguish, a
feeling nearly akin to my childish dread of the ghostly fifths on the violin. It
was now Beethoven’s music that I longed to know more thoroughly; I came
to Leipzig, and found his music to Egmont on the piano at my sister
Louisa’s. After that I tried to get hold of his sonatas. At last, at a concert at
the Gewandthaus, I heard one of the master’s symphonies for the first time;
it was the Symphony in A major. The effect on me was indescribable. To
this must be added the impression produced on me by Beethoven’s features,
which I saw in the lithographs that were circulated everywhere at that time,
and by the fact that he was deaf, and lived a quiet secluded life. I soon
conceived an image of him in my mind as a sublime and unique
supernatural being, with whom none could compare. This image was
associated in my brain with that of Shakespeare; in ecstatic dreams I met
both of them, saw and spoke to them, and on awakening found myself
bathed in tears.
It was at this time that I came across Mozart’s Requiem, which formed
the starting-point of my enthusiastic absorption in the works of that master.
His second finale to Don Juan inspired me to include him in my spirit
world.
I was now filled with a desire to compose, as I had before been to write
verse. I had, however, in this case to master the technique of an entirely
separate and complicated subject. This presented greater difficulties than I
had met with in writing verse, which came to me fairly easily. It was these
difficulties that drove me to adopt a career which bore some resemblance to
that of a professional musician, whose future distinction would be to win
the titles of Conductor and Writer of Opera.
I now wanted to set Leubald und Adelaïde to music, similar to that which
Beethoven wrote to Goethe’s Egmont; the various ghosts from the spirit
world, who were each to display different characteristics, were to borrow
Page 43
their own distinctive colouring from appropriate musical accompaniment.
In order to acquire the necessary technique of composition quickly I studied
Logier’s Methode des Generalbasses, a work which was specially
recommended to me at a musical lending library as a suitable text-book
from which this art might be easily mastered. I have distinct recollections
that the financial difficulties with which I was continually harassed
throughout my life began at this time. I borrowed Logier’s book on the
weekly payment system, in the fond hope of having to pay for it only during
a few weeks out of the savings of my weekly pocket-money. But the weeks
ran on into months, and I was still unable to compose as well as I wished.
Mr. Frederick Wieck, whose daughter afterwards married Robert
Schumann, was at that time the proprietor of that lending library. He kept
sending me troublesome reminders of the debt I owed him; and when my
bill had almost reached the price of Logier’s book I had to make a clean
breast of the matter to my family, who thus not only learnt of my financial
difficulties in general, but also of my latest transgression into the domain of
music, from which, of course, at the very most, they expected nothing better
than a repetition of Leubald und Adelaïde.
There was great consternation at home; my mother, sister, and brother-in-
law, with anxious faces, discussed how my studies should be superintended
in future, to prevent my having any further opportunity for transgressing in
this way. No one, however, yet knew the real state of affairs at school, and
they hoped I would soon see the error of my ways in this case as I had in
my former craze for poetry.
But other domestic changes were taking place which necessitated my
being for some little time alone in our house at Leipzig during the summer
of 1829, when I was left entirely to my own devices. It was during this
period that my passion for music rose to an extraordinary degree. I had
secretly been taking lessons in harmony from G. Muller, afterwards organist
at Altenburg, an excellent musician belonging to the Leipzig orchestra.
Although the payment of these lessons was also destined to get me into hot
water at home later on, I could not even make up to my teacher for the
delay in the payment of his fees by giving him the pleasure of watching me
improve in my studies. His teaching and exercises soon filled me with the
greatest disgust, as to my mind it all seemed so dry. For me music was a
spirit, a noble and mystic monster, and any attempt to regulate it seemed to
lower it in my eyes. I gathered much more congenial instruction about it
In order to acquire the necessary technique of composition quickly I studied
Logier’s Methode des Generalbasses, a work which was specially
recommended to me at a musical lending library as a suitable text-book
from which this art might be easily mastered. I have distinct recollections
that the financial difficulties with which I was continually harassed
throughout my life began at this time. I borrowed Logier’s book on the
weekly payment system, in the fond hope of having to pay for it only during
a few weeks out of the savings of my weekly pocket-money. But the weeks
ran on into months, and I was still unable to compose as well as I wished.
Mr. Frederick Wieck, whose daughter afterwards married Robert
Schumann, was at that time the proprietor of that lending library. He kept
sending me troublesome reminders of the debt I owed him; and when my
bill had almost reached the price of Logier’s book I had to make a clean
breast of the matter to my family, who thus not only learnt of my financial
difficulties in general, but also of my latest transgression into the domain of
music, from which, of course, at the very most, they expected nothing better
than a repetition of Leubald und Adelaïde.
There was great consternation at home; my mother, sister, and brother-in-
law, with anxious faces, discussed how my studies should be superintended
in future, to prevent my having any further opportunity for transgressing in
this way. No one, however, yet knew the real state of affairs at school, and
they hoped I would soon see the error of my ways in this case as I had in
my former craze for poetry.
But other domestic changes were taking place which necessitated my
being for some little time alone in our house at Leipzig during the summer
of 1829, when I was left entirely to my own devices. It was during this
period that my passion for music rose to an extraordinary degree. I had
secretly been taking lessons in harmony from G. Muller, afterwards organist
at Altenburg, an excellent musician belonging to the Leipzig orchestra.
Although the payment of these lessons was also destined to get me into hot
water at home later on, I could not even make up to my teacher for the
delay in the payment of his fees by giving him the pleasure of watching me
improve in my studies. His teaching and exercises soon filled me with the
greatest disgust, as to my mind it all seemed so dry. For me music was a
spirit, a noble and mystic monster, and any attempt to regulate it seemed to
lower it in my eyes. I gathered much more congenial instruction about it
Page 44
from Hoffmann’s Phantasiestucken than from my Leipzig orchestra player;
and now came the time when I really lived and breathed in Hoffmann’s
artistic atmosphere of ghosts and spirits. With my head quite full of
Kreissler, Krespel, and other musical spectres from my favourite author, I
imagined that I had at last found in real life a creature who resembled them:
this ideal musician in whom for a time I fancied I had discovered a second
Kreissler was a man called Flachs. He was a tall, exceedingly thin man,
with a very narrow head and an extraordinary way of walking, moving, and
speaking, whom I had seen at all those open-air concerts which formed my
principal source of musical education. He was always with the members of
the orchestra, speaking exceedingly quickly, first to one and then the other;
for they all knew him, and seemed to like him. The fact that they were
making fun of him I only learned, to my great confusion, much later. I
remember having noticed this strange figure from my earliest days in
Dresden, and I gathered from the conversations which I overheard that he
was indeed well known to all Dresden musicians. This circumstance alone
was sufficient to make me take a great interest in him; but the point about
him which attracted me more than anything was the manner in which he
listened to the various items in the programme: he used to give peculiar,
convulsive nods of his head, and blow out his cheeks as though with sighs.
All this I regarded as a sign of spiritual ecstasy. I noticed, moreover, that he
was quite alone, that he belonged to no party, and paid no attention to
anything in the garden save the music; whereupon my identification of this
curious being with the conductor Kreissler seemed quite natural. I was
determined to make his acquaintance, and I succeeded in doing so. Who
shall describe my delight when, on going to call on him at his rooms for the
first time, I found innumerable bundles of scores! I had as yet never seen a
score. It is true I discovered, to my regret, that he possessed nothing either
by Beethoven, Mozart, or Weber; in fact, nothing but immense quantities of
works, masses, and cantatas by composers such as Staerkel, Stamitz,
Steibelt, etc., all of whom were entirely unknown to me. Yet Flachs was
able to tell me so much that was good about them that the respect which I
felt for scores in general helped me to overcome my regret at not finding
anything by my beloved masters. It is true I learnt later that poor Flachs had
only come into the possession of these particular scores through
unscrupulous dealers, who had traded on his weakness of intellect and
palmed off this worthless music on him for large sums of money. At all
and now came the time when I really lived and breathed in Hoffmann’s
artistic atmosphere of ghosts and spirits. With my head quite full of
Kreissler, Krespel, and other musical spectres from my favourite author, I
imagined that I had at last found in real life a creature who resembled them:
this ideal musician in whom for a time I fancied I had discovered a second
Kreissler was a man called Flachs. He was a tall, exceedingly thin man,
with a very narrow head and an extraordinary way of walking, moving, and
speaking, whom I had seen at all those open-air concerts which formed my
principal source of musical education. He was always with the members of
the orchestra, speaking exceedingly quickly, first to one and then the other;
for they all knew him, and seemed to like him. The fact that they were
making fun of him I only learned, to my great confusion, much later. I
remember having noticed this strange figure from my earliest days in
Dresden, and I gathered from the conversations which I overheard that he
was indeed well known to all Dresden musicians. This circumstance alone
was sufficient to make me take a great interest in him; but the point about
him which attracted me more than anything was the manner in which he
listened to the various items in the programme: he used to give peculiar,
convulsive nods of his head, and blow out his cheeks as though with sighs.
All this I regarded as a sign of spiritual ecstasy. I noticed, moreover, that he
was quite alone, that he belonged to no party, and paid no attention to
anything in the garden save the music; whereupon my identification of this
curious being with the conductor Kreissler seemed quite natural. I was
determined to make his acquaintance, and I succeeded in doing so. Who
shall describe my delight when, on going to call on him at his rooms for the
first time, I found innumerable bundles of scores! I had as yet never seen a
score. It is true I discovered, to my regret, that he possessed nothing either
by Beethoven, Mozart, or Weber; in fact, nothing but immense quantities of
works, masses, and cantatas by composers such as Staerkel, Stamitz,
Steibelt, etc., all of whom were entirely unknown to me. Yet Flachs was
able to tell me so much that was good about them that the respect which I
felt for scores in general helped me to overcome my regret at not finding
anything by my beloved masters. It is true I learnt later that poor Flachs had
only come into the possession of these particular scores through
unscrupulous dealers, who had traded on his weakness of intellect and
palmed off this worthless music on him for large sums of money. At all
Page 45
events, they were scores, and that was quite enough for me. Flachs and I
became most intimate; we were always seen going about together—I, a
lanky boy of sixteen, and this weird, shaky flaxpole. The doors of my
deserted home were often opened for this strange guest, who made me play
my compositions to him while he ate bread and cheese. In return, he once
arranged one of my airs for wind instruments, and, to my astonishment, it
was actually accepted and played by the band in Kintschy’s Swiss Chalet.
That this man had not the smallest capacity to teach me anything never once
occurred to me; I was so firmly convinced of his originality that there was
no need for him to prove it further than by listening patiently to my
enthusiastic outpourings. But as, in course of time, several of his own
friends joined us, I could not help noticing that the worthy Flachs was
regarded by them all as a half-witted fool. At first this merely pained me,
but a strange incident unexpectedly occurred which converted me to the
general opinion about him. Flachs was a man of some means, and had fallen
into the toils of a young lady of dubious character who he believed was
deeply in love with him. One day, without warning, I found his house
closed to me, and discovered, to my astonishment, that jealousy was the
cause. The unexpected discovery of this liaison, which was my first
experience of such a case, filled me with a strange horror. My friend
suddenly appeared to me even more mad than he really was. I felt so
ashamed of my persistent blindness that for some time to come I never went
to any of the garden concerts for fear I should meet my sham Kreissler.
By this time I had composed my first Sonata in D minor. I had also begun
a pastoral play, and had worked it out in what I felt sure must be an entirely
unprecedented way.
I chose Goethe’s Laune der Verliebten as a model for the form and plot of
my work. I scarcely even drafted out the libretto, however, but worked it
out at the same time as the music and orchestration, so that, while I was
writing out one page of the score, I had not even thought out the words for
the next page. I remember distinctly that following this extraordinary
method, although I had not acquired the slightest knowledge about writing
for instruments, I actually worked out a fairly long passage which finally
resolved itself into a scene for three female voices followed by the air for
the tenor. My bent for writing for the orchestra was so strong that I procured
a score of Don Juan, and set to work on what I then considered a very
careful orchestration of a fairly long air for soprano. I also wrote a quartette
became most intimate; we were always seen going about together—I, a
lanky boy of sixteen, and this weird, shaky flaxpole. The doors of my
deserted home were often opened for this strange guest, who made me play
my compositions to him while he ate bread and cheese. In return, he once
arranged one of my airs for wind instruments, and, to my astonishment, it
was actually accepted and played by the band in Kintschy’s Swiss Chalet.
That this man had not the smallest capacity to teach me anything never once
occurred to me; I was so firmly convinced of his originality that there was
no need for him to prove it further than by listening patiently to my
enthusiastic outpourings. But as, in course of time, several of his own
friends joined us, I could not help noticing that the worthy Flachs was
regarded by them all as a half-witted fool. At first this merely pained me,
but a strange incident unexpectedly occurred which converted me to the
general opinion about him. Flachs was a man of some means, and had fallen
into the toils of a young lady of dubious character who he believed was
deeply in love with him. One day, without warning, I found his house
closed to me, and discovered, to my astonishment, that jealousy was the
cause. The unexpected discovery of this liaison, which was my first
experience of such a case, filled me with a strange horror. My friend
suddenly appeared to me even more mad than he really was. I felt so
ashamed of my persistent blindness that for some time to come I never went
to any of the garden concerts for fear I should meet my sham Kreissler.
By this time I had composed my first Sonata in D minor. I had also begun
a pastoral play, and had worked it out in what I felt sure must be an entirely
unprecedented way.
I chose Goethe’s Laune der Verliebten as a model for the form and plot of
my work. I scarcely even drafted out the libretto, however, but worked it
out at the same time as the music and orchestration, so that, while I was
writing out one page of the score, I had not even thought out the words for
the next page. I remember distinctly that following this extraordinary
method, although I had not acquired the slightest knowledge about writing
for instruments, I actually worked out a fairly long passage which finally
resolved itself into a scene for three female voices followed by the air for
the tenor. My bent for writing for the orchestra was so strong that I procured
a score of Don Juan, and set to work on what I then considered a very
careful orchestration of a fairly long air for soprano. I also wrote a quartette
Page 46
in D major after I had myself sufficiently mastered the alto for the viola, my
ignorance of which had caused me great difficulty only a short time before,
when I was studying a quartette by Haydn.
Armed with these works, I set out in the summer on my first journey as a
musician. My sister Clara, who was married to the singer Wolfram, had an
engagement at the theatre at Magdeburg, whither, in characteristic fashion, I
set forth upon my adventure on foot.
My short stay with my relations provided me with many experiences of
musical life. It was there that I met a new freak, whose influence upon me I
have never been able to forget. He was a musical conductor of the name of
Kuhnlein, a most extraordinary person. Already advanced in years, delicate
and, unfortunately, given to drink, this man nevertheless impressed one by
something striking and vigorous in his expression. His chief characteristics
were an enthusiastic worship of Mozart and a passionate depreciation of
Weber. He had read only one book—Goethe’s Faust—and in this work there
was not a page in which he had not underlined some passage, and made
some remark in praise of Mozart or in disparagement of Weber. It was to
this man that my brother-in-law confided the compositions which I had
brought with me in order to learn his opinion of my abilities. One evening,
as we were sitting comfortably in an inn, old Kuhnlein came in, and
approached us with a friendly, though serious manner.
I thought I read good news in his features, but when my brother-in-law
asked him what he thought of my work, he answered quietly and calmly,
‘There is not a single good note in it!’ My brother-in-law, who was
accustomed to Kuhnlein’s eccentricity, gave a loud laugh which reassured
me somewhat. It was impossible to get any advice or coherent reasons for
his opinion out of Kuhnlein; he merely renewed his abuse of Weber and
made some references to Mozart which, nevertheless, made a deep
impression upon me, as Kuhnlein’s language was always very heated and
emphatic.
On the other hand, this visit brought me a great treasure, which was
responsible for leading me in a very different direction from that advised by
Kuhnlein. This was the score of Beethoven’s great Quartette in E flat major,
which had only been fairly recently published, and of which my brother-in-
law had a copy made for me. Richer in experience, and in the possession of
this treasure, I returned to Leipzig to the nursery of my queer musical
ignorance of which had caused me great difficulty only a short time before,
when I was studying a quartette by Haydn.
Armed with these works, I set out in the summer on my first journey as a
musician. My sister Clara, who was married to the singer Wolfram, had an
engagement at the theatre at Magdeburg, whither, in characteristic fashion, I
set forth upon my adventure on foot.
My short stay with my relations provided me with many experiences of
musical life. It was there that I met a new freak, whose influence upon me I
have never been able to forget. He was a musical conductor of the name of
Kuhnlein, a most extraordinary person. Already advanced in years, delicate
and, unfortunately, given to drink, this man nevertheless impressed one by
something striking and vigorous in his expression. His chief characteristics
were an enthusiastic worship of Mozart and a passionate depreciation of
Weber. He had read only one book—Goethe’s Faust—and in this work there
was not a page in which he had not underlined some passage, and made
some remark in praise of Mozart or in disparagement of Weber. It was to
this man that my brother-in-law confided the compositions which I had
brought with me in order to learn his opinion of my abilities. One evening,
as we were sitting comfortably in an inn, old Kuhnlein came in, and
approached us with a friendly, though serious manner.
I thought I read good news in his features, but when my brother-in-law
asked him what he thought of my work, he answered quietly and calmly,
‘There is not a single good note in it!’ My brother-in-law, who was
accustomed to Kuhnlein’s eccentricity, gave a loud laugh which reassured
me somewhat. It was impossible to get any advice or coherent reasons for
his opinion out of Kuhnlein; he merely renewed his abuse of Weber and
made some references to Mozart which, nevertheless, made a deep
impression upon me, as Kuhnlein’s language was always very heated and
emphatic.
On the other hand, this visit brought me a great treasure, which was
responsible for leading me in a very different direction from that advised by
Kuhnlein. This was the score of Beethoven’s great Quartette in E flat major,
which had only been fairly recently published, and of which my brother-in-
law had a copy made for me. Richer in experience, and in the possession of
this treasure, I returned to Leipzig to the nursery of my queer musical
Page 47
studies. But my family had now returned with my sister Rosalie, and I could
no longer keep secret from them the fact that my connection with the school
had been entirely suspended, for a notice was found saying that I had not
attended the school for the last six months. As a complaint addressed by the
rector to my uncle about me had not received adequate attention, the school
authorities had apparently made no further attempts to exercise any
supervision over me, which I had indeed rendered quite impossible by
absenting myself altogether.
A fresh council of war was held in the family to discuss what was to be
done with me. As I laid particular stress on my bent for music, my relations
thought that I ought, at any rate, to learn one instrument thoroughly. My
brother-in-law, Brockhaus, proposed to send me to Hummel, at Weimar, to
be trained as a pianist, but as I loudly protested that by ‘music’ I meant
‘composing,’ and not ‘playing an instrument,’ they gave way, and decided
to let me have regular lessons in harmony from Muller, the very musician
from whom I had had instruction on the sly some little while before, and
who had not yet been paid. In return for this I promised faithfully to go
back to work conscientiously at St. Nicholas’s School. I soon grew tired of
both. I could brook no control, and this unfortunately applied to my musical
instruction as well. The dry study of harmony disgusted me more and more,
though I continued to conceive fantasias, sonatas, and overtures, and work
them out by myself. On the other hand, I was spurred on by ambition to
show what I could do at school if I liked. When the Upper School boys
were set the task of writing a poem, I composed a chorus in Greek, on the
recent War of Liberation. I can well imagine that this Greek poem had about
as much resemblance to a real Greek oration and poetry, as the sonatas and
overtures I used to compose at that time had to thoroughly professional
music. My attempt was scornfully rejected as a piece of impudence. After
that I have no further recollections of my school. My continued attendance
was a pure sacrifice on my side, made out of consideration for my family: I
did not pay the slightest attention to what was taught in the lessons, but
secretly occupied myself all the while with reading any book that happened
to attract me.
As my musical instruction also did me no good, I continued in my wilful
process of self-education by copying out the scores of my beloved masters,
and in so doing acquired a neat handwriting, which in later years has often
no longer keep secret from them the fact that my connection with the school
had been entirely suspended, for a notice was found saying that I had not
attended the school for the last six months. As a complaint addressed by the
rector to my uncle about me had not received adequate attention, the school
authorities had apparently made no further attempts to exercise any
supervision over me, which I had indeed rendered quite impossible by
absenting myself altogether.
A fresh council of war was held in the family to discuss what was to be
done with me. As I laid particular stress on my bent for music, my relations
thought that I ought, at any rate, to learn one instrument thoroughly. My
brother-in-law, Brockhaus, proposed to send me to Hummel, at Weimar, to
be trained as a pianist, but as I loudly protested that by ‘music’ I meant
‘composing,’ and not ‘playing an instrument,’ they gave way, and decided
to let me have regular lessons in harmony from Muller, the very musician
from whom I had had instruction on the sly some little while before, and
who had not yet been paid. In return for this I promised faithfully to go
back to work conscientiously at St. Nicholas’s School. I soon grew tired of
both. I could brook no control, and this unfortunately applied to my musical
instruction as well. The dry study of harmony disgusted me more and more,
though I continued to conceive fantasias, sonatas, and overtures, and work
them out by myself. On the other hand, I was spurred on by ambition to
show what I could do at school if I liked. When the Upper School boys
were set the task of writing a poem, I composed a chorus in Greek, on the
recent War of Liberation. I can well imagine that this Greek poem had about
as much resemblance to a real Greek oration and poetry, as the sonatas and
overtures I used to compose at that time had to thoroughly professional
music. My attempt was scornfully rejected as a piece of impudence. After
that I have no further recollections of my school. My continued attendance
was a pure sacrifice on my side, made out of consideration for my family: I
did not pay the slightest attention to what was taught in the lessons, but
secretly occupied myself all the while with reading any book that happened
to attract me.
As my musical instruction also did me no good, I continued in my wilful
process of self-education by copying out the scores of my beloved masters,
and in so doing acquired a neat handwriting, which in later years has often
Page 48
been admired. I believe my copies of the C minor Symphony and the Ninth
Symphony by Beethoven are still preserved as souvenirs.
Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony became the mystical goal of all my strange
thoughts and desires about music. I was first attracted to it by the opinion
prevalent among musicians, not only in Leipzig but elsewhere, that this
work had been written by Beethoven when he was already half mad. It was
considered the ‘non plus ultra’ of all that was fantastic and
incomprehensible, and this was quite enough to rouse in me a passionate
desire to study this mysterious work. At the very first glance at the score, of
which I obtained possession with such difficulty, I felt irresistibly attracted
by the long-sustained pure fifths with which the first phrase opens: these
chords, which, as I related above, had played such a supernatural part in my
childish impressions of music, seemed in this case to form the spiritual
keynote of my own life. This, I thought, must surely contain the secret of all
secrets, and accordingly the first thing to be done was to make the score my
own by a process of laborious copying. I well remember that on one
occasion the sudden appearance of the dawn made such an uncanny
impression on my excited nerves that I jumped into bed with a scream as
though I had seen a ghost. The symphony at that time had not yet been
arranged for the piano; it had found so little favour that the publisher did
not feel inclined to run the risk of producing it. I set to work at it, and
actually composed a complete piano solo, which I tried to play to myself. I
sent my work to Schott, the publisher of the score, at Mainz. I received in
reply a letter saying ‘that the publishers had not yet decided to issue the
Ninth Symphony for the piano, but that they would gladly keep my
laborious work,’ and offered me remuneration in the shape of the score of
the great Missa Solemnis in D, which I accepted with great pleasure.
In addition to this work I practised the violin for some time, as my
harmony master very rightly considered that some knowledge of the
practical working of this instrument was indispensable for any one who had
the intention of composing for the orchestra. My mother, indeed, paid the
violinist Sipp (who was still playing in the Leipzig orchestra in 1865) eight
thalers for a violin (I do not know what became of it), with which for quite
three months I must have inflicted unutterable torture upon my mother and
sister by practising in my tiny little room. I got so far as to play certain
Variations in F sharp by Mayseder, but only reached the second or third.
After that I have no further recollections of this practising, in which my
Symphony by Beethoven are still preserved as souvenirs.
Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony became the mystical goal of all my strange
thoughts and desires about music. I was first attracted to it by the opinion
prevalent among musicians, not only in Leipzig but elsewhere, that this
work had been written by Beethoven when he was already half mad. It was
considered the ‘non plus ultra’ of all that was fantastic and
incomprehensible, and this was quite enough to rouse in me a passionate
desire to study this mysterious work. At the very first glance at the score, of
which I obtained possession with such difficulty, I felt irresistibly attracted
by the long-sustained pure fifths with which the first phrase opens: these
chords, which, as I related above, had played such a supernatural part in my
childish impressions of music, seemed in this case to form the spiritual
keynote of my own life. This, I thought, must surely contain the secret of all
secrets, and accordingly the first thing to be done was to make the score my
own by a process of laborious copying. I well remember that on one
occasion the sudden appearance of the dawn made such an uncanny
impression on my excited nerves that I jumped into bed with a scream as
though I had seen a ghost. The symphony at that time had not yet been
arranged for the piano; it had found so little favour that the publisher did
not feel inclined to run the risk of producing it. I set to work at it, and
actually composed a complete piano solo, which I tried to play to myself. I
sent my work to Schott, the publisher of the score, at Mainz. I received in
reply a letter saying ‘that the publishers had not yet decided to issue the
Ninth Symphony for the piano, but that they would gladly keep my
laborious work,’ and offered me remuneration in the shape of the score of
the great Missa Solemnis in D, which I accepted with great pleasure.
In addition to this work I practised the violin for some time, as my
harmony master very rightly considered that some knowledge of the
practical working of this instrument was indispensable for any one who had
the intention of composing for the orchestra. My mother, indeed, paid the
violinist Sipp (who was still playing in the Leipzig orchestra in 1865) eight
thalers for a violin (I do not know what became of it), with which for quite
three months I must have inflicted unutterable torture upon my mother and
sister by practising in my tiny little room. I got so far as to play certain
Variations in F sharp by Mayseder, but only reached the second or third.
After that I have no further recollections of this practising, in which my
Page 49
family fortunately had very good reasons of their own for not encouraging
me.
But the time now arrived when my interest in the theatre again took a
passionate hold upon me. A new company had been formed in my
birthplace under very good auspices. The Board of Management of the
Court Theatre at Dresden had taken over the management of the Leipzig
theatre for three years. My sister Rosalie was a member of the company,
and through her I could always gain admittance to the performances; and
that which in my childhood had been merely the interest aroused by a
strange spirit of curiosity now became a more deep-seated and conscious
passion.
Julius Caesar, Macbeth, Hamlet, the plays of Schiller, and to crown all,
Goethe’s Faust, excited and stirred me deeply. The Opera was giving the
first performances of Marschner’s Vampir and Templer und Judin. The
Italian company arrived from Dresden, and fascinated the Leipzig audience
by their consummate mastery of their art. Even I was almost carried away
by the enthusiasm with which the town was over-whelmed, into forgetting
the boyish impressions which Signor Sassaroli had stamped upon my mind,
when another miracle—which also came to us from Dresden—suddenly
gave a new direction to my artistic feelings and exercised a decisive
influence over my whole life. This consisted of a special performance given
by Wilhelmine Schroder-Devrient, who at that time was at the zenith of her
artistic career, young, beautiful, and ardent, and whose like I have never
again seen on the stage. She made her appearance in Fidelio.
If I look back on my life as a whole, I can find no event that produced so
profound an impression upon me. Any one who can remember that
wonderful woman at this period of her life must to some extent have
experienced the almost Satanic ardour which the intensely human art of this
incomparable actress poured into his veins. After the performance I rushed
to a friend’s house and wrote a short note to the singer, in which I briefly
told her that from that moment my life had acquired its true significance,
and that if in days to come she should ever hear my name praised in the
world of Art, she must remember that she had that evening made me what I
then swore it was my destiny to become. This note I left at her hotel, and
ran out into the night as if I were mad. In the year 1842, when I went to
Dresden to make my debut with Rienzi, I paid several visits to the kind-
me.
But the time now arrived when my interest in the theatre again took a
passionate hold upon me. A new company had been formed in my
birthplace under very good auspices. The Board of Management of the
Court Theatre at Dresden had taken over the management of the Leipzig
theatre for three years. My sister Rosalie was a member of the company,
and through her I could always gain admittance to the performances; and
that which in my childhood had been merely the interest aroused by a
strange spirit of curiosity now became a more deep-seated and conscious
passion.
Julius Caesar, Macbeth, Hamlet, the plays of Schiller, and to crown all,
Goethe’s Faust, excited and stirred me deeply. The Opera was giving the
first performances of Marschner’s Vampir and Templer und Judin. The
Italian company arrived from Dresden, and fascinated the Leipzig audience
by their consummate mastery of their art. Even I was almost carried away
by the enthusiasm with which the town was over-whelmed, into forgetting
the boyish impressions which Signor Sassaroli had stamped upon my mind,
when another miracle—which also came to us from Dresden—suddenly
gave a new direction to my artistic feelings and exercised a decisive
influence over my whole life. This consisted of a special performance given
by Wilhelmine Schroder-Devrient, who at that time was at the zenith of her
artistic career, young, beautiful, and ardent, and whose like I have never
again seen on the stage. She made her appearance in Fidelio.
If I look back on my life as a whole, I can find no event that produced so
profound an impression upon me. Any one who can remember that
wonderful woman at this period of her life must to some extent have
experienced the almost Satanic ardour which the intensely human art of this
incomparable actress poured into his veins. After the performance I rushed
to a friend’s house and wrote a short note to the singer, in which I briefly
told her that from that moment my life had acquired its true significance,
and that if in days to come she should ever hear my name praised in the
world of Art, she must remember that she had that evening made me what I
then swore it was my destiny to become. This note I left at her hotel, and
ran out into the night as if I were mad. In the year 1842, when I went to
Dresden to make my debut with Rienzi, I paid several visits to the kind-
Page 50
hearted singer, who startled me on one occasion by repeating this letter
word for word. It seemed to have made an impression on her too, as she had
actually kept it.
At this point I feel myself obliged to acknowledge that the great
confusion which now began to prevail in my life, and particularly in my
studies, was due to the inordinate effect this artistic interpretation had upon
me. I did not know where to turn, or how to set about producing something
myself which might place me in direct contact with the impression I had
received, while everything that could not be brought into touch with it
seemed to me so shallow and meaningless that I could not possibly trouble
myself with it. I should have liked to compose a work worthy of a
Schroder-Devrient; but as this was quite beyond my power, in my head-
long despair I let all artistic endeavour slide, and as my work was also
utterly insufficient to absorb me, I flung myself recklessly into the life of
the moment in the company of strangely chosen associates, and indulged in
all kinds of youthful excesses.
I now entered into all the dissipations of raw manhood, the outward
ugliness and inward emptiness of which make me marvel to this day. My
intercourse with those of my own age had always been the result of pure
chance. I cannot remember that any special inclination or attraction
determined me in the choice of my young friends. While I can honestly say
that I was never in a position to stand aloof out of envy from any one who
was specially gifted, I can only explain my indifference in the choice of my
associates by the fact that through inexperience regarding the sort of
companionship that would be of advantage to me, I cared only to have some
one who would accompany me in my excursions, and to whom I could pour
out my feelings to my heart’s content without caring what effect it might
have upon him. The result of this was that after a stream of confidences to
which my own excitement was the only response, I at length reached the
point when I turned and looked at my friend; to my astonishment I
generally found that there was no question of response at all, and as soon as
I set my heart on drawing something from him in return, and urged him to
confide in me, when he really had nothing to tell, the connection usually
came to an end and left no trace on my life. In a certain sense my strange
relationship with Flachs was typical of the great majority of my ties in after-
life. Consequently, as no lasting personal bond of friendship ever found its
way into my life, it is easy to understand how delight in the dissipations of
word for word. It seemed to have made an impression on her too, as she had
actually kept it.
At this point I feel myself obliged to acknowledge that the great
confusion which now began to prevail in my life, and particularly in my
studies, was due to the inordinate effect this artistic interpretation had upon
me. I did not know where to turn, or how to set about producing something
myself which might place me in direct contact with the impression I had
received, while everything that could not be brought into touch with it
seemed to me so shallow and meaningless that I could not possibly trouble
myself with it. I should have liked to compose a work worthy of a
Schroder-Devrient; but as this was quite beyond my power, in my head-
long despair I let all artistic endeavour slide, and as my work was also
utterly insufficient to absorb me, I flung myself recklessly into the life of
the moment in the company of strangely chosen associates, and indulged in
all kinds of youthful excesses.
I now entered into all the dissipations of raw manhood, the outward
ugliness and inward emptiness of which make me marvel to this day. My
intercourse with those of my own age had always been the result of pure
chance. I cannot remember that any special inclination or attraction
determined me in the choice of my young friends. While I can honestly say
that I was never in a position to stand aloof out of envy from any one who
was specially gifted, I can only explain my indifference in the choice of my
associates by the fact that through inexperience regarding the sort of
companionship that would be of advantage to me, I cared only to have some
one who would accompany me in my excursions, and to whom I could pour
out my feelings to my heart’s content without caring what effect it might
have upon him. The result of this was that after a stream of confidences to
which my own excitement was the only response, I at length reached the
point when I turned and looked at my friend; to my astonishment I
generally found that there was no question of response at all, and as soon as
I set my heart on drawing something from him in return, and urged him to
confide in me, when he really had nothing to tell, the connection usually
came to an end and left no trace on my life. In a certain sense my strange
relationship with Flachs was typical of the great majority of my ties in after-
life. Consequently, as no lasting personal bond of friendship ever found its
way into my life, it is easy to understand how delight in the dissipations of
Page 51
student life could become a passion of some duration, because in it
individual intercourse is entirely replaced by a common circle of
acquaintances. In the midst of rowdyism and ragging of the most foolish
description, I remained quite alone, and it is quite possible that these
frivolities formed a protecting hedge round my inmost soul, which needed
time to grow to its natural strength and not be weakened by reaching
maturity too soon.
My life seemed to break up in all directions; I had to leave St. Nicholas’s
School at Easter 1830, as I was too deeply in disgrace with the staff of
masters ever to hope for any promotion in the University from that quarter.
It was now determined that I should study privately for six months and then
go to St. Thomas’s School, where I should be in fresh surroundings and be
able to work up and qualify in a short time for the University. My uncle
Adolph, with whom I was constantly renewing my friendship, and who also
encouraged me about my music and exercised a good influence over me in
that respect, in spite of the utter degradation of my life at that time, kept
arousing in me an ever fresh desire for scientific studies. I took private
lessons in Greek from a scholar, and read Sophocles with him. For a time I
hoped this noble poet would again inspire me to get a real hold on the
language, but the hope was vain. I had not chosen the right teacher, and,
moreover, his sitting-room in which we pursued our studies looked out on a
tanyard, the repulsive odour of which affected my nerves so strongly that I
became thoroughly disgusted both with Sophocles and Greek. My brother-
in-law, Brockhaus, who wanted to put me in the way of earning some
pocket-money, gave me the correcting of the proof-sheets of a new edition
he was bringing out of Becker’s Universal History, revised by Lobell. This
gave me a reason for improving by private study the superficial general
instruction on every subject which is given at school, and I thus acquired
the valuable knowledge which I was destined to have in later life of most of
the branches of learning so uninterestingly taught in class. I must not forget
to mention that, to a certain extent, the attraction exercised over me by this
first closer study of history was due to the fact that it brought me in
eightpence a sheet, and I thus found myself in one of the rarest positions in
my life, actually earning money; yet I should be doing myself an injustice if
I did not bear in mind the vivid impressions I now for the first time received
upon turning my serious attention to those periods of history with which I
had hitherto had a very superficial acquaintance. All I recollect about my
individual intercourse is entirely replaced by a common circle of
acquaintances. In the midst of rowdyism and ragging of the most foolish
description, I remained quite alone, and it is quite possible that these
frivolities formed a protecting hedge round my inmost soul, which needed
time to grow to its natural strength and not be weakened by reaching
maturity too soon.
My life seemed to break up in all directions; I had to leave St. Nicholas’s
School at Easter 1830, as I was too deeply in disgrace with the staff of
masters ever to hope for any promotion in the University from that quarter.
It was now determined that I should study privately for six months and then
go to St. Thomas’s School, where I should be in fresh surroundings and be
able to work up and qualify in a short time for the University. My uncle
Adolph, with whom I was constantly renewing my friendship, and who also
encouraged me about my music and exercised a good influence over me in
that respect, in spite of the utter degradation of my life at that time, kept
arousing in me an ever fresh desire for scientific studies. I took private
lessons in Greek from a scholar, and read Sophocles with him. For a time I
hoped this noble poet would again inspire me to get a real hold on the
language, but the hope was vain. I had not chosen the right teacher, and,
moreover, his sitting-room in which we pursued our studies looked out on a
tanyard, the repulsive odour of which affected my nerves so strongly that I
became thoroughly disgusted both with Sophocles and Greek. My brother-
in-law, Brockhaus, who wanted to put me in the way of earning some
pocket-money, gave me the correcting of the proof-sheets of a new edition
he was bringing out of Becker’s Universal History, revised by Lobell. This
gave me a reason for improving by private study the superficial general
instruction on every subject which is given at school, and I thus acquired
the valuable knowledge which I was destined to have in later life of most of
the branches of learning so uninterestingly taught in class. I must not forget
to mention that, to a certain extent, the attraction exercised over me by this
first closer study of history was due to the fact that it brought me in
eightpence a sheet, and I thus found myself in one of the rarest positions in
my life, actually earning money; yet I should be doing myself an injustice if
I did not bear in mind the vivid impressions I now for the first time received
upon turning my serious attention to those periods of history with which I
had hitherto had a very superficial acquaintance. All I recollect about my
Page 52
school days in this connection is that I was attracted by the classical period
of Greek history; Marathon, Salamis, and Thermopylae composed the
canon of all that interested me in the subject. Now for the first time I made
an intimate acquaintance with the Middle Ages and the French Revolution,
as my work in correcting dealt precisely with the two volumes which
contained these two periods. I remember in particular that the description of
the Revolution filled me with sincere hatred for its heroes; unfamiliar as I
was with the previous history of France, my human sympathy was horrified
by the cruelty of the men of that day, and this purely human impulse
remained so strong in me that I remember how even quite recently it cost
me a real struggle to give any weight to the true political significance of
those acts of violence.
How great, then, was my astonishment when one day the current political
events of the time enabled me, as it were, to gain a personal experience of
the sort of national upheavals with which I had come into distant contact in
the course of my proof-correcting. The special editions of the Leipzig
Gazette brought us the news of the July Revolution in Paris. The King of
France had been driven from his throne; Lafayette, who a moment before
had seemed a myth to me, was again riding through a cheering crowd in the
streets of Paris; the Swiss Guards had once more been butchered in the
Tuileries, and a new King knew no better way of commending himself to
the populace than by declaring himself the embodiment of the Republic.
Suddenly to become conscious of living at a time in which such things took
place could not fail to have a startling effect on a boy of seventeen. The
world as a historic phenomenon began from that day in my eyes, and
naturally my sympathies were wholly on the side of the Revolution, which I
regarded in the light of a heroic popular struggle crowned with victory, and
free from the blemish of the terrible excesses that stained the first French
Revolution. As the whole of Europe, including some of the German states,
was soon plunged more or less violently into rebellion, I remained for some
time in a feverish state of suspense, and now first turned my attention to the
causes of these upheavals, which I regarded as struggles of the young and
hopeful against the old and effete portion of mankind. Saxony also did not
remain unscathed; in Dresden it came to actual fighting in the streets, which
immediately produced a political change in the shape of the proclamation of
the regency of the future King Frederick, and the granting of a constitution.
This event filled me with such enthusiasm that I composed a political
of Greek history; Marathon, Salamis, and Thermopylae composed the
canon of all that interested me in the subject. Now for the first time I made
an intimate acquaintance with the Middle Ages and the French Revolution,
as my work in correcting dealt precisely with the two volumes which
contained these two periods. I remember in particular that the description of
the Revolution filled me with sincere hatred for its heroes; unfamiliar as I
was with the previous history of France, my human sympathy was horrified
by the cruelty of the men of that day, and this purely human impulse
remained so strong in me that I remember how even quite recently it cost
me a real struggle to give any weight to the true political significance of
those acts of violence.
How great, then, was my astonishment when one day the current political
events of the time enabled me, as it were, to gain a personal experience of
the sort of national upheavals with which I had come into distant contact in
the course of my proof-correcting. The special editions of the Leipzig
Gazette brought us the news of the July Revolution in Paris. The King of
France had been driven from his throne; Lafayette, who a moment before
had seemed a myth to me, was again riding through a cheering crowd in the
streets of Paris; the Swiss Guards had once more been butchered in the
Tuileries, and a new King knew no better way of commending himself to
the populace than by declaring himself the embodiment of the Republic.
Suddenly to become conscious of living at a time in which such things took
place could not fail to have a startling effect on a boy of seventeen. The
world as a historic phenomenon began from that day in my eyes, and
naturally my sympathies were wholly on the side of the Revolution, which I
regarded in the light of a heroic popular struggle crowned with victory, and
free from the blemish of the terrible excesses that stained the first French
Revolution. As the whole of Europe, including some of the German states,
was soon plunged more or less violently into rebellion, I remained for some
time in a feverish state of suspense, and now first turned my attention to the
causes of these upheavals, which I regarded as struggles of the young and
hopeful against the old and effete portion of mankind. Saxony also did not
remain unscathed; in Dresden it came to actual fighting in the streets, which
immediately produced a political change in the shape of the proclamation of
the regency of the future King Frederick, and the granting of a constitution.
This event filled me with such enthusiasm that I composed a political
Page 53
overture, the prelude of which depicted dark oppression in the midst of
which a strain was at last heard under which, to make my meaning clearer, I
wrote the words Friedrich und Freiheil; this strain was intended to develop
gradually and majestically into the fullest triumph, which I hoped shortly to
see successfully performed at one of the Leipzig Garden Concerts.
However, before I was able to develop my politico-musical conceptions
further, disorders broke out in Leipzig itself which summoned me from the
precincts of Art to take a direct share in national life. National life in
Leipzig at this time meant nothing more than antagonism between the
students and the police, the latter being the arch-enemy upon whom the
youthful love of liberty vented itself. Some students had been arrested in a
street broil who were now to be rescued. The under-graduates, who had
been restless for some days, assembled one evening in the Market Place and
the Clubs, mustered together, and made a ring round their leaders. The
whole proceeding was marked by a certain measured solemnity, which
impressed me deeply. They sang Gaudeamus igitur, formed up into column,
and picking up from the crowd any young men who sympathised with them,
marched gravely and resolutely from the Market Place to the University
buildings, to open the cells and set free the students who had been arrested.
My heart beat fast as I marched with them to this ‘Taking of the Bastille,’
but things did not turn out as we expected, for in the courtyard of the
Paulinum the solemn procession was stopped by Rector Krug, who had
come down to meet it with his grey head bared; his assurance that the
captives had already been released at his request was greeted with a
thundering cheer, and the matter seemed at an end.
But the tense expectation of a revolution had grown too great not to
demand some sacrifice. A summons was suddenly spread calling us to a
notorious alley in order to exercise popular justice upon a hated magistrate
who, it was rumoured, had unlawfully taken under his protection a certain
house of ill-fame in that quarter. When I reached the spot with the tail-end
of the crowd, I found the house had been broken into and all sorts of
violence had been committed. I recall with horror the intoxicating effect this
unreasoning fury had upon me, and cannot deny that without the slightest
personal provocation I shared, like one possessed, in the frantic onslaught
of the undergraduates, who madly shattered furniture and crockery to bits. I
do not believe that the ostensible motive for this outrage, which, it is true,
was to be found in a fact that was a grave menace to public morality, had
which a strain was at last heard under which, to make my meaning clearer, I
wrote the words Friedrich und Freiheil; this strain was intended to develop
gradually and majestically into the fullest triumph, which I hoped shortly to
see successfully performed at one of the Leipzig Garden Concerts.
However, before I was able to develop my politico-musical conceptions
further, disorders broke out in Leipzig itself which summoned me from the
precincts of Art to take a direct share in national life. National life in
Leipzig at this time meant nothing more than antagonism between the
students and the police, the latter being the arch-enemy upon whom the
youthful love of liberty vented itself. Some students had been arrested in a
street broil who were now to be rescued. The under-graduates, who had
been restless for some days, assembled one evening in the Market Place and
the Clubs, mustered together, and made a ring round their leaders. The
whole proceeding was marked by a certain measured solemnity, which
impressed me deeply. They sang Gaudeamus igitur, formed up into column,
and picking up from the crowd any young men who sympathised with them,
marched gravely and resolutely from the Market Place to the University
buildings, to open the cells and set free the students who had been arrested.
My heart beat fast as I marched with them to this ‘Taking of the Bastille,’
but things did not turn out as we expected, for in the courtyard of the
Paulinum the solemn procession was stopped by Rector Krug, who had
come down to meet it with his grey head bared; his assurance that the
captives had already been released at his request was greeted with a
thundering cheer, and the matter seemed at an end.
But the tense expectation of a revolution had grown too great not to
demand some sacrifice. A summons was suddenly spread calling us to a
notorious alley in order to exercise popular justice upon a hated magistrate
who, it was rumoured, had unlawfully taken under his protection a certain
house of ill-fame in that quarter. When I reached the spot with the tail-end
of the crowd, I found the house had been broken into and all sorts of
violence had been committed. I recall with horror the intoxicating effect this
unreasoning fury had upon me, and cannot deny that without the slightest
personal provocation I shared, like one possessed, in the frantic onslaught
of the undergraduates, who madly shattered furniture and crockery to bits. I
do not believe that the ostensible motive for this outrage, which, it is true,
was to be found in a fact that was a grave menace to public morality, had
Page 54
any weight with me whatever; on the contrary, it was the purely devilish
fury of these popular outbursts that drew me, too, like a madman into their
vortex.
The fact that such fits of fury are not quick to abate, but, in accordance
with certain natural laws, reach their proper conclusion only after they have
degenerated into frenzy, I was to learn in my own person. Scarcely did the
summons ring out for us to march to another resort of the same kind than I
too found myself in the tide which set towards the opposite end of the town.
There the same exploits were repeated, and the most ludicrous outrages
perpetrated. I cannot remember that the enjoyment of alcoholic drinks
contributed to the intoxication of myself and my immediate fellows. I only
know that I finally got into the state that usually succeeds a debauch, and
upon waking next morning, as if from a hideous nightmare, had to convince
myself that I had really taken part in the events of the previous night by a
trophy I possessed in the shape of a tattered red curtain, which I had
brought home as a token of my prowess. The thought that people generally,
and my own family in particular, were wont to put a lenient construction
upon youthful escapades was a great comfort to me; outbursts of this kind
on the part of the young were regarded as righteous indignation against
really serious scandals, and there was no need for me to be afraid of owning
up to having taken part in such excesses.
The dangerous example, however, which had been set by the
undergraduates incited the lower classes and the mob to similar excesses on
the following nights, against employers and any who were obnoxious to
them. The matter at once assumed a more serious complexion; property was
threatened, and a conflict between rich and poor stood grinning at our
doors. As there were no soldiers in the town, and the police were thoroughly
disorganised, the students were called in as a protection against the lower
orders. An undergraduate’s hour of glory now began, such as I could only
have thirsted for in my schoolboy dreams. The student became the tutelar
deity of Leipzig, called on by the authorities to arm and band together in
defence of property, and the same young men who two days before had
yielded to a rage for destruction, now mustered in the University courtyard.
The proscribed names of the students’ clubs and unions were shouted by the
mouths of town councillors and chief constables in order to summon
curiously equipped undergraduates, who thereupon, in simple mediaeval
array of war, scattered throughout the town, occupied the guard-rooms at
fury of these popular outbursts that drew me, too, like a madman into their
vortex.
The fact that such fits of fury are not quick to abate, but, in accordance
with certain natural laws, reach their proper conclusion only after they have
degenerated into frenzy, I was to learn in my own person. Scarcely did the
summons ring out for us to march to another resort of the same kind than I
too found myself in the tide which set towards the opposite end of the town.
There the same exploits were repeated, and the most ludicrous outrages
perpetrated. I cannot remember that the enjoyment of alcoholic drinks
contributed to the intoxication of myself and my immediate fellows. I only
know that I finally got into the state that usually succeeds a debauch, and
upon waking next morning, as if from a hideous nightmare, had to convince
myself that I had really taken part in the events of the previous night by a
trophy I possessed in the shape of a tattered red curtain, which I had
brought home as a token of my prowess. The thought that people generally,
and my own family in particular, were wont to put a lenient construction
upon youthful escapades was a great comfort to me; outbursts of this kind
on the part of the young were regarded as righteous indignation against
really serious scandals, and there was no need for me to be afraid of owning
up to having taken part in such excesses.
The dangerous example, however, which had been set by the
undergraduates incited the lower classes and the mob to similar excesses on
the following nights, against employers and any who were obnoxious to
them. The matter at once assumed a more serious complexion; property was
threatened, and a conflict between rich and poor stood grinning at our
doors. As there were no soldiers in the town, and the police were thoroughly
disorganised, the students were called in as a protection against the lower
orders. An undergraduate’s hour of glory now began, such as I could only
have thirsted for in my schoolboy dreams. The student became the tutelar
deity of Leipzig, called on by the authorities to arm and band together in
defence of property, and the same young men who two days before had
yielded to a rage for destruction, now mustered in the University courtyard.
The proscribed names of the students’ clubs and unions were shouted by the
mouths of town councillors and chief constables in order to summon
curiously equipped undergraduates, who thereupon, in simple mediaeval
array of war, scattered throughout the town, occupied the guard-rooms at
Page 55
the gates, provided sentinels for the grounds of various wealthy merchants,
and, as occasion demanded, took places which seemed threatened, more
especially inns, under their permanent protection.
Though, unluckily, I was not yet a member of their body, I anticipated the
delights of academic citizenship by half-impudent, half-obsequious
solicitation of the leaders of the students whom I honoured most. I had the
good fortune to recommend myself particularly to these ‘cocks of the walk,’
as they were styled, on account of my relationship to Brockhaus, in whose
grounds the main body of these champions were encamped for some time.
My brother-in-law was among those who had been seriously threatened,
and it was only owing to really great presence of mind and assurance that
he succeeded in saving his printing works, and especially his steam presses,
which were the chief object of attack, from destruction. To protect his
property against further assault, detachments of students were told off to his
grounds as well; the excellent entertainment which the generous master of
the house offered his jovial guardians in his pleasant summer-house enticed
the pick of the students to him. My brother-in-law was for several weeks
guarded day and night against possible attacks by the populace, and on this
occasion, as the mediator of a flowing hospitality, I celebrated among the
most famous ‘bloods’ of the University the true saturnalia of my scholarly
ambition.
For a still longer period the guarding of the gates was entrusted to the
students; the unheard-of splendour which accordingly became associated
with this post drew fresh aspirants to the spot from far and near. Every day
huge chartered vehicles discharged at the Halle Gate whole bands of the
boldest sons of learning from Halle, Jena, Gottingen, and the remotest
regions. They got down close to the guards at the gate, and for several
weeks never set foot in an inn or any other dwelling; they lived at the
expense of the Council, drew vouchers on the police for food and drink, and
knew but one care, that the possibility of a general quieting of men’s minds
would make their opportune guardianship superfluous. I never missed a day
on guard or a night either, alas! trying to impress on my family the urgent
need for my personal endurance. Of course, the quieter and really studious
spirits among us soon resigned these duties, and only the flower of the flock
of undergraduates remained so staunch that it became difficult for the
authorities to relieve them of their task. I held out to the very last, and
succeeded in making most astonishing friends for my age. Many of the
and, as occasion demanded, took places which seemed threatened, more
especially inns, under their permanent protection.
Though, unluckily, I was not yet a member of their body, I anticipated the
delights of academic citizenship by half-impudent, half-obsequious
solicitation of the leaders of the students whom I honoured most. I had the
good fortune to recommend myself particularly to these ‘cocks of the walk,’
as they were styled, on account of my relationship to Brockhaus, in whose
grounds the main body of these champions were encamped for some time.
My brother-in-law was among those who had been seriously threatened,
and it was only owing to really great presence of mind and assurance that
he succeeded in saving his printing works, and especially his steam presses,
which were the chief object of attack, from destruction. To protect his
property against further assault, detachments of students were told off to his
grounds as well; the excellent entertainment which the generous master of
the house offered his jovial guardians in his pleasant summer-house enticed
the pick of the students to him. My brother-in-law was for several weeks
guarded day and night against possible attacks by the populace, and on this
occasion, as the mediator of a flowing hospitality, I celebrated among the
most famous ‘bloods’ of the University the true saturnalia of my scholarly
ambition.
For a still longer period the guarding of the gates was entrusted to the
students; the unheard-of splendour which accordingly became associated
with this post drew fresh aspirants to the spot from far and near. Every day
huge chartered vehicles discharged at the Halle Gate whole bands of the
boldest sons of learning from Halle, Jena, Gottingen, and the remotest
regions. They got down close to the guards at the gate, and for several
weeks never set foot in an inn or any other dwelling; they lived at the
expense of the Council, drew vouchers on the police for food and drink, and
knew but one care, that the possibility of a general quieting of men’s minds
would make their opportune guardianship superfluous. I never missed a day
on guard or a night either, alas! trying to impress on my family the urgent
need for my personal endurance. Of course, the quieter and really studious
spirits among us soon resigned these duties, and only the flower of the flock
of undergraduates remained so staunch that it became difficult for the
authorities to relieve them of their task. I held out to the very last, and
succeeded in making most astonishing friends for my age. Many of the
Page 56
most audacious remained in Leipzig even when there was no guard duty to
fulfil, and peopled the place for some time with champions of an
extraordinarily desperate and dissipated type, who had been repeatedly sent
down from various universities for rowdyism or debt, and who now, thanks
to the exceptional circumstances of the day, found a refuge in Leipzig,
where at first they had been received with open arms by the general
enthusiasm of their comrades.
In the presence of all these phenomena I felt as if I were surrounded by
the results of an earthquake which had upset the usual order of things. My
brother-in-law, Friedrich Brockhaus, who could justly taunt the former
authorities of the place with their inability to maintain peace and order, was
carried away by the current of a formidable movement of opposition. He
made a daring speech at the Guildhall before their worships the Town
Council, which brought him popularity, and he was appointed second-in-
command of the newly constituted Leipzig Municipal Guard. This body at
length ousted my adored students from the guard-rooms of the town gates,
and we no longer had the right of stopping travellers and inspecting their
passes. On the other hand, I flattered myself that I might regard my new
position as a boy citizen as equivalent to that of the French National Guard,
and my brother-in-law, Brockhaus, as a Saxon Lafayette, which, at all
events, succeeded in furnishing my soaring excitement with a healthy
stimulant. I now began to read the papers and cultivate politics
enthusiastically; however, the social intercourse of the civic world did not
attract me sufficiently to make me false to my beloved academic associates.
I followed them faithfully from the guard-rooms to the ordinary bars, where
their splendour as men of the literary world now sought retirement.
My chief ambition was to become one of them as soon as possible. This,
however, could only be accomplished by being again entered at a grammar
school. St. Thomas’s, whose headmaster was a feeble old man, was the
place where my wishes could be most speedily attained.
I joined the school in the autumn of 1830 simply with the intention of
qualifying myself for the Leaving Examination by merely nominal
attendance there. The chief thing in connection with it was that I and friends
of the same bent succeeded in establishing a sham students’ association
called the Freshman’s Club. It was formed with all possible pedantry, the
institution of the ‘Comment’ was introduced, fencing-practice and sword-
fulfil, and peopled the place for some time with champions of an
extraordinarily desperate and dissipated type, who had been repeatedly sent
down from various universities for rowdyism or debt, and who now, thanks
to the exceptional circumstances of the day, found a refuge in Leipzig,
where at first they had been received with open arms by the general
enthusiasm of their comrades.
In the presence of all these phenomena I felt as if I were surrounded by
the results of an earthquake which had upset the usual order of things. My
brother-in-law, Friedrich Brockhaus, who could justly taunt the former
authorities of the place with their inability to maintain peace and order, was
carried away by the current of a formidable movement of opposition. He
made a daring speech at the Guildhall before their worships the Town
Council, which brought him popularity, and he was appointed second-in-
command of the newly constituted Leipzig Municipal Guard. This body at
length ousted my adored students from the guard-rooms of the town gates,
and we no longer had the right of stopping travellers and inspecting their
passes. On the other hand, I flattered myself that I might regard my new
position as a boy citizen as equivalent to that of the French National Guard,
and my brother-in-law, Brockhaus, as a Saxon Lafayette, which, at all
events, succeeded in furnishing my soaring excitement with a healthy
stimulant. I now began to read the papers and cultivate politics
enthusiastically; however, the social intercourse of the civic world did not
attract me sufficiently to make me false to my beloved academic associates.
I followed them faithfully from the guard-rooms to the ordinary bars, where
their splendour as men of the literary world now sought retirement.
My chief ambition was to become one of them as soon as possible. This,
however, could only be accomplished by being again entered at a grammar
school. St. Thomas’s, whose headmaster was a feeble old man, was the
place where my wishes could be most speedily attained.
I joined the school in the autumn of 1830 simply with the intention of
qualifying myself for the Leaving Examination by merely nominal
attendance there. The chief thing in connection with it was that I and friends
of the same bent succeeded in establishing a sham students’ association
called the Freshman’s Club. It was formed with all possible pedantry, the
institution of the ‘Comment’ was introduced, fencing-practice and sword-
Page 57
bouts were held, and an inaugural meeting to which several prominent
students were invited, and at which I presided as ‘Vice’ in white buckskin
trousers and great jack-boots, gave me a foretaste of the delights awaiting
me as a full-blown son of the Muses.
The masters of St. Thomas’s, however, were not quite so ready to fall in
with my aspirations to studentship; at the end of the half-year they were of
the opinion that I had not given a thought to their institution, and nothing
could persuade them that I had earned a title to academic citizenship by any
acquisition of knowledge. Some sort of decision was necessary, so I
accordingly informed my family that I had made up my mind not to study
for a profession at the University, but to become a musician. There was
nothing to prevent me matriculating as ‘Studiosus Musicae,’ and, without
therefore troubling myself about the pedantries of the authorities at St.
Thomas’s, I defiantly quitted that seat of learning from which I had derived
small profit, and presented myself forthwith to the rector of the University,
whose acquaintance I had made on the evening of the riot, to be enrolled as
a student of music. This was accordingly done without further ado, on the
payment of the usual fees.
I was in a great hurry about it, for in a week the Easter vacation would
begin, and the ‘men’ would go down from Leipzig, when it would be
impossible to be elected member of a club until the vacation was over, and
to stay all those weeks at home in Leipzig without having the right to wear
the coveted colours seemed to me unendurable torture. Straight from the
rector’s presence I ran like a wounded animal to the fencing school, to
present myself for admission to the Saxon Club, showing my card of
matriculation. I attained my object, I could wear the colours of the Saxonia,
which was in the fashion at that time, and in great request because it
numbered so many delightful members in its ranks.
The strangest fate was to befall me in this Easter vacation, during which I
was really the only remaining representative of the Saxon Club in Leipzig.
In the beginning this club consisted chiefly of men of good family as well
as the better class elements of the student world; all of them were members
of highly placed and well-to-do families in Saxony in general, and in
particular from the capital, Dresden, and spent their vacation at their
respective homes. There remained in Leipzig during the vacations only
those wandering students who had no homes, and for whom in reality it was
students were invited, and at which I presided as ‘Vice’ in white buckskin
trousers and great jack-boots, gave me a foretaste of the delights awaiting
me as a full-blown son of the Muses.
The masters of St. Thomas’s, however, were not quite so ready to fall in
with my aspirations to studentship; at the end of the half-year they were of
the opinion that I had not given a thought to their institution, and nothing
could persuade them that I had earned a title to academic citizenship by any
acquisition of knowledge. Some sort of decision was necessary, so I
accordingly informed my family that I had made up my mind not to study
for a profession at the University, but to become a musician. There was
nothing to prevent me matriculating as ‘Studiosus Musicae,’ and, without
therefore troubling myself about the pedantries of the authorities at St.
Thomas’s, I defiantly quitted that seat of learning from which I had derived
small profit, and presented myself forthwith to the rector of the University,
whose acquaintance I had made on the evening of the riot, to be enrolled as
a student of music. This was accordingly done without further ado, on the
payment of the usual fees.
I was in a great hurry about it, for in a week the Easter vacation would
begin, and the ‘men’ would go down from Leipzig, when it would be
impossible to be elected member of a club until the vacation was over, and
to stay all those weeks at home in Leipzig without having the right to wear
the coveted colours seemed to me unendurable torture. Straight from the
rector’s presence I ran like a wounded animal to the fencing school, to
present myself for admission to the Saxon Club, showing my card of
matriculation. I attained my object, I could wear the colours of the Saxonia,
which was in the fashion at that time, and in great request because it
numbered so many delightful members in its ranks.
The strangest fate was to befall me in this Easter vacation, during which I
was really the only remaining representative of the Saxon Club in Leipzig.
In the beginning this club consisted chiefly of men of good family as well
as the better class elements of the student world; all of them were members
of highly placed and well-to-do families in Saxony in general, and in
particular from the capital, Dresden, and spent their vacation at their
respective homes. There remained in Leipzig during the vacations only
those wandering students who had no homes, and for whom in reality it was
Page 58
always or never holiday time. Among those a separate club had arisen of
daring and desperate young reprobates who had found a last refuge, as I
said, at Leipzig in the glorious period I have recorded. I had already made
the personal acquaintance of these swashbucklers, who pleased my fancy
greatly, when they were guarding the Brockhaus grounds. Although the
regular duration of a university course did not exceed three years, most of
these men had never left their universities for six or seven years.
I was particularly fascinated by a man called Gebhardt, who was
endowed with extraordinary physical beauty and strength, and whose slim
heroic figure towered head and shoulders above all his companions. When
he walked down the street arm-in-arm with two of the strongest of his
comrades, he used suddenly to take it into his head, by an easy movement
of his arm, to lift his friends high in the air and flutter along in this way as
though he had a pair of human wings. When a cab was going along the
streets at a sharp trot, he would seize a spoke of the wheel with one hand
and force it to pull up. Nobody ever told him that he was stupid because
they were afraid of his strength, hence his limitations were scarcely noticed.
His redoubtable strength, combined with a temperate disposition, lent him a
majestic dignity which placed him above the level of an ordinary mortal. He
had come to Leipzig from Mecklenburg in the company of a certain
Degelow, who was as powerful and adroit, though by no means of such
gigantic proportions, as his friend, and whose chief attraction lay in his
great vivacity and animated features, he had led a wild and dissipated life in
which play, drink, passionate love affairs, and constant and prompt duelling
had rung the changes. Ceremonious politeness, an ironic and pedantic
coldness, which testified to bold self-confidence, combined with a very hot
temper, formed the chief characteristics of this personage and natures akin
to his. Degelow’s wildness and passion were lent a curious diabolical charm
by the possession of a malicious humour which he often turned against
himself, whereas towards others he exercised a certain chivalrous
tenderness.
These two extraordinary men were joined by others who possessed all the
qualities essential to a reckless life, together with real and headstrong
valour. One of them, named Stelzer, a regular Berserker out of the
Nibelungenlied, who was nick-named Lope, was in his twentieth term.
While these men openly and consciously belonged to a world doomed to
destruction, and all their actions and escapades could only be explained by
daring and desperate young reprobates who had found a last refuge, as I
said, at Leipzig in the glorious period I have recorded. I had already made
the personal acquaintance of these swashbucklers, who pleased my fancy
greatly, when they were guarding the Brockhaus grounds. Although the
regular duration of a university course did not exceed three years, most of
these men had never left their universities for six or seven years.
I was particularly fascinated by a man called Gebhardt, who was
endowed with extraordinary physical beauty and strength, and whose slim
heroic figure towered head and shoulders above all his companions. When
he walked down the street arm-in-arm with two of the strongest of his
comrades, he used suddenly to take it into his head, by an easy movement
of his arm, to lift his friends high in the air and flutter along in this way as
though he had a pair of human wings. When a cab was going along the
streets at a sharp trot, he would seize a spoke of the wheel with one hand
and force it to pull up. Nobody ever told him that he was stupid because
they were afraid of his strength, hence his limitations were scarcely noticed.
His redoubtable strength, combined with a temperate disposition, lent him a
majestic dignity which placed him above the level of an ordinary mortal. He
had come to Leipzig from Mecklenburg in the company of a certain
Degelow, who was as powerful and adroit, though by no means of such
gigantic proportions, as his friend, and whose chief attraction lay in his
great vivacity and animated features, he had led a wild and dissipated life in
which play, drink, passionate love affairs, and constant and prompt duelling
had rung the changes. Ceremonious politeness, an ironic and pedantic
coldness, which testified to bold self-confidence, combined with a very hot
temper, formed the chief characteristics of this personage and natures akin
to his. Degelow’s wildness and passion were lent a curious diabolical charm
by the possession of a malicious humour which he often turned against
himself, whereas towards others he exercised a certain chivalrous
tenderness.
These two extraordinary men were joined by others who possessed all the
qualities essential to a reckless life, together with real and headstrong
valour. One of them, named Stelzer, a regular Berserker out of the
Nibelungenlied, who was nick-named Lope, was in his twentieth term.
While these men openly and consciously belonged to a world doomed to
destruction, and all their actions and escapades could only be explained by
Page 59
the hypothesis that they all believed that inevitable ruin was imminent, I
made in their company the acquaintance of a certain Schroter, who
particularly attracted me by his cordial disposition, pleasant Hanoverian
accent, and refined wit. He was not one of the regular young dare-devils,
towards whom he adopted a calm observant attitude, while they were all
fond of him and glad to see him. I made a real friend of this Schroter,
although he was much older than I was. Through him I became acquainted
with the works and poems of H. Heine, and from him I acquired a certain
neat and saucy wit, and I was quite ready to surrender myself to his
agreeable influence in the hope of improving my outward bearing. It was
his company in particular that I sought every day; in the afternoon I
generally met him in the Rosenthal or Kintschy’s Chalet, though always in
the presence of those wonderful Goths who excited at once my alarm and
admiration.
They all belonged to university clubs which were on hostile terms with
the one of which I was a member. What this hostility between the various
clubs meant only those can judge who are familiar with the tone prevalent
among them in those days. The mere sight of hostile colours sufficed to
infuriate these men, who otherwise were kind and gentle, provided they had
taken the slightest drop too much. At all events, as long as the old stagers
were sober they would look with good-natured complacency at a slight
young fellow like me in the hostile colours moving among them so
amicably. Those colours I wore in my own peculiar fashion. I had made use
of the brief week during which my club was still in Leipzig to become the
possessor of a splendid ‘Saxon’ cap, richly embroidered with silver, and
worn by a man called Muller, who was afterwards a prominent constable at
Dresden. I had been seized with such a violent craving for this cap that I
managed to buy it from him, as he wanted money to go home. In spite of
this remarkable cap I was, as I have said, welcome in the den of this band of
rowdies: my friend Schroter saw to that. It was only when the grog, which
was the principal beverage of these wild spirits, began to work that I used to
notice curious glances and overhear doubtful speeches, the significance of
which was for some time hidden from me by the dizziness in which my
own senses were plunged by this baneful drink.
As I was inevitably bound on this account to be mixed up in quarrels for
some time to come, it afforded me a great satisfaction that my first fight, as
a matter of fact, arose from an incident more creditable to me than those
made in their company the acquaintance of a certain Schroter, who
particularly attracted me by his cordial disposition, pleasant Hanoverian
accent, and refined wit. He was not one of the regular young dare-devils,
towards whom he adopted a calm observant attitude, while they were all
fond of him and glad to see him. I made a real friend of this Schroter,
although he was much older than I was. Through him I became acquainted
with the works and poems of H. Heine, and from him I acquired a certain
neat and saucy wit, and I was quite ready to surrender myself to his
agreeable influence in the hope of improving my outward bearing. It was
his company in particular that I sought every day; in the afternoon I
generally met him in the Rosenthal or Kintschy’s Chalet, though always in
the presence of those wonderful Goths who excited at once my alarm and
admiration.
They all belonged to university clubs which were on hostile terms with
the one of which I was a member. What this hostility between the various
clubs meant only those can judge who are familiar with the tone prevalent
among them in those days. The mere sight of hostile colours sufficed to
infuriate these men, who otherwise were kind and gentle, provided they had
taken the slightest drop too much. At all events, as long as the old stagers
were sober they would look with good-natured complacency at a slight
young fellow like me in the hostile colours moving among them so
amicably. Those colours I wore in my own peculiar fashion. I had made use
of the brief week during which my club was still in Leipzig to become the
possessor of a splendid ‘Saxon’ cap, richly embroidered with silver, and
worn by a man called Muller, who was afterwards a prominent constable at
Dresden. I had been seized with such a violent craving for this cap that I
managed to buy it from him, as he wanted money to go home. In spite of
this remarkable cap I was, as I have said, welcome in the den of this band of
rowdies: my friend Schroter saw to that. It was only when the grog, which
was the principal beverage of these wild spirits, began to work that I used to
notice curious glances and overhear doubtful speeches, the significance of
which was for some time hidden from me by the dizziness in which my
own senses were plunged by this baneful drink.
As I was inevitably bound on this account to be mixed up in quarrels for
some time to come, it afforded me a great satisfaction that my first fight, as
a matter of fact, arose from an incident more creditable to me than those
Page 60
provocations which I had left half unnoticed. One day Degelow came up to
Schroter and me in a wine-bar that we often frequented, and in quite a
friendly manner confessed to us confidentially his liking for a young and
very pretty actress whose talent Schroter disputed. Degelow rejoined that
this was as it might be, but that, for his part, he regarded the young lady as
the most respectable woman in the theatre. I at once asked him if he
considered my sister’s reputation was not as good. According to students’
notions it was impossible for Degelow, who doubtless had not the remotest
intention of being insulting, to give me any assurance further than to say
that he certainly did not think my sister had an inferior reputation, but that,
nevertheless, he meant to abide by his assertion concerning the young lady
he had mentioned. Hereupon followed without delay the usual challenge,
opening with the words, ‘You’re an ass,’ which sounded almost ridiculous
to my own ears when I said them to this seasoned swashbuckler.
I remember that Degelow too gasped with astonishment, and lightning
seemed to flash from his eyes; but he controlled himself in the presence of
my friend, and proceeded to observe the usual formalities of a challenge,
and chose broadswords (krumme Sabel) as the weapons for the fight. The
event made a great stir among our companions, but I saw less reason than
before to abstain from my usual intercourse with them. Only I became more
strict about the behaviour of the swashbucklers, and for several days no
evening passed without producing a challenge between me and some
formidable bully, until at last Count Solms, the only member of my club
who had returned to Leipzig as yet, visited me as though he were an
intimate friend and inquired into what had occurred. He applauded my
conduct, but advised me not to wear my colours until the return of our
comrades from the vacation, and to keep away from the bad company into
which I had ventured. Fortunately I had not long to wait; university life
soon began again, and the fencing ground was filled. The unenviable
position, in which, in student phrase, I was suspended with a half-dozen of
the most terrible swordsmen, earned me a glorious reputation among the
‘freshmen’ and ‘juniors,’ and even among the older ‘champions’ of the
Saxonia.
My seconds were duly arranged, the dates for the various duels on hand
settled, and by the care of my seniors the needful time was secured for me
to acquire some sort of skill in fencing. The light heart with which I awaited
the fate which threatened me in at least one of the impending encounters I
Schroter and me in a wine-bar that we often frequented, and in quite a
friendly manner confessed to us confidentially his liking for a young and
very pretty actress whose talent Schroter disputed. Degelow rejoined that
this was as it might be, but that, for his part, he regarded the young lady as
the most respectable woman in the theatre. I at once asked him if he
considered my sister’s reputation was not as good. According to students’
notions it was impossible for Degelow, who doubtless had not the remotest
intention of being insulting, to give me any assurance further than to say
that he certainly did not think my sister had an inferior reputation, but that,
nevertheless, he meant to abide by his assertion concerning the young lady
he had mentioned. Hereupon followed without delay the usual challenge,
opening with the words, ‘You’re an ass,’ which sounded almost ridiculous
to my own ears when I said them to this seasoned swashbuckler.
I remember that Degelow too gasped with astonishment, and lightning
seemed to flash from his eyes; but he controlled himself in the presence of
my friend, and proceeded to observe the usual formalities of a challenge,
and chose broadswords (krumme Sabel) as the weapons for the fight. The
event made a great stir among our companions, but I saw less reason than
before to abstain from my usual intercourse with them. Only I became more
strict about the behaviour of the swashbucklers, and for several days no
evening passed without producing a challenge between me and some
formidable bully, until at last Count Solms, the only member of my club
who had returned to Leipzig as yet, visited me as though he were an
intimate friend and inquired into what had occurred. He applauded my
conduct, but advised me not to wear my colours until the return of our
comrades from the vacation, and to keep away from the bad company into
which I had ventured. Fortunately I had not long to wait; university life
soon began again, and the fencing ground was filled. The unenviable
position, in which, in student phrase, I was suspended with a half-dozen of
the most terrible swordsmen, earned me a glorious reputation among the
‘freshmen’ and ‘juniors,’ and even among the older ‘champions’ of the
Saxonia.
My seconds were duly arranged, the dates for the various duels on hand
settled, and by the care of my seniors the needful time was secured for me
to acquire some sort of skill in fencing. The light heart with which I awaited
the fate which threatened me in at least one of the impending encounters I
Page 61
myself could not understand at the time; on the other hand, the way in
which that fate preserved me from the consequences of my rashness seems
truly miraculous in my eyes to this day, and, worthy of further description.
The preparations for a duel included obtaining some experience of these
encounters by being present at several of them. We freshmen attained this
object by what is called ‘carrying duty,’ that is to say, we were entrusted
with the rapiers of the corps (precious weapons of honour belonging to the
association), and had to take them first to the grinder and thence to the
scene of encounter, a proceeding which was attended with some danger, as
it had to be done surreptitiously, since duelling was forbidden by law; in
return we acquired the right of assisting as spectators at the impending
engagements.
When I had earned this honour, the meeting-place chosen for the duel I
was to watch was the billiard-room of an inn in the Burgstrasse; the table
had been moved to one side, and on it the authorised spectators took their
places. Among them I stood up with a beating heart to watch the dangerous
encounters between those doughty champions. I was told on this occasion
of the story of one of my friends (a Jew named Levy, but known as
Lippert), who on this very floor had given so much ground before his
antagonist that the door had to be opened for him, and he fell back through
it down the steps into the street, still believing he was engaged in the duel.
When several bouts had been finished, two men came on to the ‘pitch,’
Tempel, the president of the Markomanen, and a certain Wohlfart, an old
stager, already in his fourteenth half-year of study, with whom I also was
booked for an encounter later on. When this was the case, a man was not
allowed to watch, in order that the weak points of the duellist might not be
betrayed to his future opponent. Wohlfart was accordingly asked by my
chiefs whether he wanted me removed; whereupon he replied with calm
contempt, ‘Let them leave the little freshman there, in God’s name!’ Thus I
became an eye-witness of the disablement of a swordsman who
nevertheless showed himself so experienced and skilful on the occasion that
I might well have become alarmed for the issue of my future encounter with
him. His gigantic opponent cut the artery of his right arm, which at once
ended the fight; the surgeon declared that Wohlfart would not be able to
hold a sword again for years, under which circumstances my proposed
meeting with him was at once cancelled. I do not deny that this incident
cheered my soul.
which that fate preserved me from the consequences of my rashness seems
truly miraculous in my eyes to this day, and, worthy of further description.
The preparations for a duel included obtaining some experience of these
encounters by being present at several of them. We freshmen attained this
object by what is called ‘carrying duty,’ that is to say, we were entrusted
with the rapiers of the corps (precious weapons of honour belonging to the
association), and had to take them first to the grinder and thence to the
scene of encounter, a proceeding which was attended with some danger, as
it had to be done surreptitiously, since duelling was forbidden by law; in
return we acquired the right of assisting as spectators at the impending
engagements.
When I had earned this honour, the meeting-place chosen for the duel I
was to watch was the billiard-room of an inn in the Burgstrasse; the table
had been moved to one side, and on it the authorised spectators took their
places. Among them I stood up with a beating heart to watch the dangerous
encounters between those doughty champions. I was told on this occasion
of the story of one of my friends (a Jew named Levy, but known as
Lippert), who on this very floor had given so much ground before his
antagonist that the door had to be opened for him, and he fell back through
it down the steps into the street, still believing he was engaged in the duel.
When several bouts had been finished, two men came on to the ‘pitch,’
Tempel, the president of the Markomanen, and a certain Wohlfart, an old
stager, already in his fourteenth half-year of study, with whom I also was
booked for an encounter later on. When this was the case, a man was not
allowed to watch, in order that the weak points of the duellist might not be
betrayed to his future opponent. Wohlfart was accordingly asked by my
chiefs whether he wanted me removed; whereupon he replied with calm
contempt, ‘Let them leave the little freshman there, in God’s name!’ Thus I
became an eye-witness of the disablement of a swordsman who
nevertheless showed himself so experienced and skilful on the occasion that
I might well have become alarmed for the issue of my future encounter with
him. His gigantic opponent cut the artery of his right arm, which at once
ended the fight; the surgeon declared that Wohlfart would not be able to
hold a sword again for years, under which circumstances my proposed
meeting with him was at once cancelled. I do not deny that this incident
cheered my soul.
Page 62
Shortly afterwards the first general reunion of our club was held at the
Green Tap. These gatherings are regular hot-beds for the production of
duels. Here I brought upon myself a new encounter with one Tischer, but
learned at the same time that I had been relieved of two of my most
formidable previous engagements of the kind by the disappearance of my
opponents, both of whom had escaped on account of debt and left no trace
behind them. The only one of whom I could hear anything was the terrible
Stelzer, surnamed Lope. This fellow had taken advantage of the passing of
Polish refugees, who had at that time already been driven over the frontier
and were making their way through Germany to France, to disguise himself
as an ill-starred champion of freedom, and he subsequently found his way
to the Foreign Legion in Algeria. On the way home from the gathering,
Degelow, whom I was to meet in a few weeks, proposed a ‘truce.’ This was
a device which, if it was accepted, as it was in this case, enabled the future
combatants to entertain and talk to one another, which was otherwise most
strictly forbidden. We wandered back to the town arm-in-arm; with
chivalrous tenderness my interesting and formidable opponent declared that
he was delighted at the prospect of crossing swords with me in a few
weeks’ time; that he regarded it as an honour and a pleasure, as he was fond
of me and respected me for my valorous conduct. Seldom has any personal
success flattered me more. We embraced, and amid protestations which,
owing to a certain dignity about them, acquired a significance I can never
forget, we parted. He informed me that he must first pay a visit to Jena,
where he had an appointment to fight a duel. A week later the news of his
death reached Leipzig; he had been mortally wounded in the duel at Jena.
I felt as if I were living in a dream, out of which I was aroused by the
announcement of my encounter with Tischer. Though he was a first-rate and
vigorous fighter, he had been chosen by our chiefs for my first passage of
arms because he was fairly short. In spite of being unable to feel any great
confidence in my hastily acquired and little practised skill in fencing, I
looked forward to this my first duel with a light heart. Although it was
against the rules, I never dreamed of telling the authorities that I was
suffering from a slight rash which I had caught at that time, and which I was
informed made wounds so dangerous that if it were reported it would
postpone the meeting, in spite of the fact that I was modest enough to be
prepared for wounds. I was sent for at ten in the morning, and left home
smiling to think what my mother and sisters would say if in a few hours I
Green Tap. These gatherings are regular hot-beds for the production of
duels. Here I brought upon myself a new encounter with one Tischer, but
learned at the same time that I had been relieved of two of my most
formidable previous engagements of the kind by the disappearance of my
opponents, both of whom had escaped on account of debt and left no trace
behind them. The only one of whom I could hear anything was the terrible
Stelzer, surnamed Lope. This fellow had taken advantage of the passing of
Polish refugees, who had at that time already been driven over the frontier
and were making their way through Germany to France, to disguise himself
as an ill-starred champion of freedom, and he subsequently found his way
to the Foreign Legion in Algeria. On the way home from the gathering,
Degelow, whom I was to meet in a few weeks, proposed a ‘truce.’ This was
a device which, if it was accepted, as it was in this case, enabled the future
combatants to entertain and talk to one another, which was otherwise most
strictly forbidden. We wandered back to the town arm-in-arm; with
chivalrous tenderness my interesting and formidable opponent declared that
he was delighted at the prospect of crossing swords with me in a few
weeks’ time; that he regarded it as an honour and a pleasure, as he was fond
of me and respected me for my valorous conduct. Seldom has any personal
success flattered me more. We embraced, and amid protestations which,
owing to a certain dignity about them, acquired a significance I can never
forget, we parted. He informed me that he must first pay a visit to Jena,
where he had an appointment to fight a duel. A week later the news of his
death reached Leipzig; he had been mortally wounded in the duel at Jena.
I felt as if I were living in a dream, out of which I was aroused by the
announcement of my encounter with Tischer. Though he was a first-rate and
vigorous fighter, he had been chosen by our chiefs for my first passage of
arms because he was fairly short. In spite of being unable to feel any great
confidence in my hastily acquired and little practised skill in fencing, I
looked forward to this my first duel with a light heart. Although it was
against the rules, I never dreamed of telling the authorities that I was
suffering from a slight rash which I had caught at that time, and which I was
informed made wounds so dangerous that if it were reported it would
postpone the meeting, in spite of the fact that I was modest enough to be
prepared for wounds. I was sent for at ten in the morning, and left home
smiling to think what my mother and sisters would say if in a few hours I
Page 63
were brought back in the alarming state I anticipated. My chief, Herr v.
Schonfeld, was a pleasant, quiet sort of man, who lived on the marsh. When
I reached his house, he leant out of the window with his pipe in his mouth,
and greeted me with the words: ‘You can go home, my lad, it is all off;
Tischer is in hospital.’ When I got upstairs I found several ‘leading men’
assembled, from whom I learned that Tischer had got very drunk the night
before, and had in consequence laid himself open to the most outrageous
treatment by the inhabitants of a house of ill-fame. He was terribly hurt, and
had been taken by the police in the first instance to the hospital. This
inevitably meant rustication, and, above all, expulsion from the academic
association to which he belonged.
I cannot clearly recall the incidents that removed from Leipzig the few
remaining fire-eaters to whom I had pledged myself since that fatal
vacation-time; I only know that this aide of my fame as a student yielded to
another. We celebrated the ‘freshmen’s gathering,’ to which all those who
could manage it drove a four-in-hand in a long procession through the town.
After the president of the club had profoundly moved me with his sudden
and yet prolonged solemnity, I conceived the desire to be among the very
last to return home from the outing. Accordingly I stayed away three days
and three nights, and spent the time chiefly in gambling, a pastime which
from the first night of our festivity cast its devilish snares around me. Some
half-dozen of the smartest club members chanced to be together at early
dawn in the Jolly Peasant, and forthwith formed the nucleus of a gambling
club, which was reinforced during the day by recruits coming back from the
town. Members came to see whether we were still at it, members also went
away, but I with the original six held out for days and nights without
faltering.
The desire that first prompted me to take part in the play was the wish to
win enough for my score (two thalers): this I succeeded in doing, and
thereupon I was inspired with the hope of being able to settle all the debts I
had made at that time by my winnings at play. Just as I had hoped to learn
composition most quickly by Logier’s method, but had found myself
hampered in my object for a long period by unexpected difficulties, so my
plan for speedily improving my financial position was likewise doomed to
disappointment. To win was not such an easy matter, and for some three
months I was such a victim to the rage for gambling that no other passion
was able to exercise the slightest influence over my mind.
Schonfeld, was a pleasant, quiet sort of man, who lived on the marsh. When
I reached his house, he leant out of the window with his pipe in his mouth,
and greeted me with the words: ‘You can go home, my lad, it is all off;
Tischer is in hospital.’ When I got upstairs I found several ‘leading men’
assembled, from whom I learned that Tischer had got very drunk the night
before, and had in consequence laid himself open to the most outrageous
treatment by the inhabitants of a house of ill-fame. He was terribly hurt, and
had been taken by the police in the first instance to the hospital. This
inevitably meant rustication, and, above all, expulsion from the academic
association to which he belonged.
I cannot clearly recall the incidents that removed from Leipzig the few
remaining fire-eaters to whom I had pledged myself since that fatal
vacation-time; I only know that this aide of my fame as a student yielded to
another. We celebrated the ‘freshmen’s gathering,’ to which all those who
could manage it drove a four-in-hand in a long procession through the town.
After the president of the club had profoundly moved me with his sudden
and yet prolonged solemnity, I conceived the desire to be among the very
last to return home from the outing. Accordingly I stayed away three days
and three nights, and spent the time chiefly in gambling, a pastime which
from the first night of our festivity cast its devilish snares around me. Some
half-dozen of the smartest club members chanced to be together at early
dawn in the Jolly Peasant, and forthwith formed the nucleus of a gambling
club, which was reinforced during the day by recruits coming back from the
town. Members came to see whether we were still at it, members also went
away, but I with the original six held out for days and nights without
faltering.
The desire that first prompted me to take part in the play was the wish to
win enough for my score (two thalers): this I succeeded in doing, and
thereupon I was inspired with the hope of being able to settle all the debts I
had made at that time by my winnings at play. Just as I had hoped to learn
composition most quickly by Logier’s method, but had found myself
hampered in my object for a long period by unexpected difficulties, so my
plan for speedily improving my financial position was likewise doomed to
disappointment. To win was not such an easy matter, and for some three
months I was such a victim to the rage for gambling that no other passion
was able to exercise the slightest influence over my mind.
Page 64
Neither the Fechtboden (where the students’ fights were practised), nor
the beer-house, nor the actual scene of the fights, ever saw my face again.
In my lamentable position I racked my brains all day to devise ways and
means of getting the money wherewith to gamble at night. In vain did my
poor mother try everything in her power to induce me not to come home so
late at night, although she had no idea of the real nature of my debauches:
after I had left the house in the afternoon I never returned till dawn the next
day, and I reached my room (which was at some distance from the others)
by climbing over the gate, for my mother had refused to give me a latch-
key.
In despair over my ill-luck, my passion for gambling grew into a
veritable mania, and I no longer felt any inclination for those things which
at one time had lured me to student life. I became absolutely indifferent to
the opinion of my former companions and avoided them entirely; I now lost
myself in the smaller gambling dens of Leipzig, where only the very scum
of the students congregated. Insensible to any feeling of self-respect, I bore
even the contempt of my sister Rosalie; both she and my mother hardly ever
deigning to cast a glance at the young libertine whom they only saw at rare
intervals, looking deadly pale and worn out: my ever-growing despair made
me at last resort to foolhardiness as the only means of forcing hostile fate to
my side. It suddenly struck me that only by dint of big stakes could I make
big profits. To this end I decided to make use of my mother’s pension, of
which I was trustee of a fairly large sum. That night I lost everything I had
with me except one thaler: the excitement with which I staked that last coin
on a card was an experience hitherto quite strange to my young life. As I
had had nothing to eat, I was obliged repeatedly to leave the gambling table
owing to sickness. With this last thaler I staked my life, for my return to my
home was, of course, out of the question. Already I saw myself in the grey
dawn, a prodigal son, fleeing from all I held dear, through forest and field
towards the unknown. My mood of despair had gained so strong a hold
upon me that, when my card won, I immediately placed all the money on a
fresh stake, and repeated this experiment until I had won quite a
considerable amount. From that moment my luck grew continuously. I
gained such confidence that I risked the most hazardous stakes: for
suddenly it dawned upon me that this was destined to be my last day with
the cards. My good fortune now became so obvious that the bank thought it
wise to close. Not only had I won back all the money I had lost, but I had
the beer-house, nor the actual scene of the fights, ever saw my face again.
In my lamentable position I racked my brains all day to devise ways and
means of getting the money wherewith to gamble at night. In vain did my
poor mother try everything in her power to induce me not to come home so
late at night, although she had no idea of the real nature of my debauches:
after I had left the house in the afternoon I never returned till dawn the next
day, and I reached my room (which was at some distance from the others)
by climbing over the gate, for my mother had refused to give me a latch-
key.
In despair over my ill-luck, my passion for gambling grew into a
veritable mania, and I no longer felt any inclination for those things which
at one time had lured me to student life. I became absolutely indifferent to
the opinion of my former companions and avoided them entirely; I now lost
myself in the smaller gambling dens of Leipzig, where only the very scum
of the students congregated. Insensible to any feeling of self-respect, I bore
even the contempt of my sister Rosalie; both she and my mother hardly ever
deigning to cast a glance at the young libertine whom they only saw at rare
intervals, looking deadly pale and worn out: my ever-growing despair made
me at last resort to foolhardiness as the only means of forcing hostile fate to
my side. It suddenly struck me that only by dint of big stakes could I make
big profits. To this end I decided to make use of my mother’s pension, of
which I was trustee of a fairly large sum. That night I lost everything I had
with me except one thaler: the excitement with which I staked that last coin
on a card was an experience hitherto quite strange to my young life. As I
had had nothing to eat, I was obliged repeatedly to leave the gambling table
owing to sickness. With this last thaler I staked my life, for my return to my
home was, of course, out of the question. Already I saw myself in the grey
dawn, a prodigal son, fleeing from all I held dear, through forest and field
towards the unknown. My mood of despair had gained so strong a hold
upon me that, when my card won, I immediately placed all the money on a
fresh stake, and repeated this experiment until I had won quite a
considerable amount. From that moment my luck grew continuously. I
gained such confidence that I risked the most hazardous stakes: for
suddenly it dawned upon me that this was destined to be my last day with
the cards. My good fortune now became so obvious that the bank thought it
wise to close. Not only had I won back all the money I had lost, but I had
Page 65
won enough to pay off all my debts as well. My sensations during the whole
of this process were of the most sacred nature: I felt as if God and His
angels were standing by my side and were whispering words of warning
and of consolation into my ears.
Once more I climbed over the gate of my home in the early hours of the
morning, this time to sleep peacefully and soundly and to awake very late,
strengthened and as though born again.
No sense of shame deterred me from telling my mother, to whom I
presented her money, the whole truth about this decisive night. I voluntarily
confessed my sin in having utilised her pension, sparing no detail. She
folded her hands and thanked God for His mercy, and forthwith regarded
me as saved, believing it impossible for me ever to commit such a crime
again.
And, truth to tell, gambling had lost all fascination for me from that
moment. The world, in which I had moved like one demented, suddenly
seemed stripped of all interest or attraction. My rage for gambling had
already made me quite indifferent to the usual student’s vanities, and when I
was freed from this passion also, I suddenly found myself face to face with
an entirely new world.
To this world I belonged henceforth: it was the world of real and serious
musical study, to which I now devoted myself heart and soul.
Even during this wild period of my life, my musical development had not
been entirely at a standstill; on the contrary, it daily became plainer that
music was the only direction towards which my mental tendencies had a
marked bent. Only I had got quite out of the habit of musical study. Even
now it seems incredible that I managed to find time in those days to finish
quite a substantial amount of composition. I have but the faintest
recollection of an Overture in C major (6/8 time), and of a Sonata in B flat
major arranged as a duet; the latter pleased my sister Ottilie, who played it
with me, so much that I arranged it for orchestra. But another work of this
period, an Overture in B flat major, left an indelible impression on my mind
on account of an incident connected with it. This composition, in fact, was
the outcome of my study of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony in about the
same degree as Leubald und Adelaïde was the result of my study of
Shakespeare. I had made a special point of bringing out the mystic meaning
in the orchestra, which I divided into three distinctly different and opposite
of this process were of the most sacred nature: I felt as if God and His
angels were standing by my side and were whispering words of warning
and of consolation into my ears.
Once more I climbed over the gate of my home in the early hours of the
morning, this time to sleep peacefully and soundly and to awake very late,
strengthened and as though born again.
No sense of shame deterred me from telling my mother, to whom I
presented her money, the whole truth about this decisive night. I voluntarily
confessed my sin in having utilised her pension, sparing no detail. She
folded her hands and thanked God for His mercy, and forthwith regarded
me as saved, believing it impossible for me ever to commit such a crime
again.
And, truth to tell, gambling had lost all fascination for me from that
moment. The world, in which I had moved like one demented, suddenly
seemed stripped of all interest or attraction. My rage for gambling had
already made me quite indifferent to the usual student’s vanities, and when I
was freed from this passion also, I suddenly found myself face to face with
an entirely new world.
To this world I belonged henceforth: it was the world of real and serious
musical study, to which I now devoted myself heart and soul.
Even during this wild period of my life, my musical development had not
been entirely at a standstill; on the contrary, it daily became plainer that
music was the only direction towards which my mental tendencies had a
marked bent. Only I had got quite out of the habit of musical study. Even
now it seems incredible that I managed to find time in those days to finish
quite a substantial amount of composition. I have but the faintest
recollection of an Overture in C major (6/8 time), and of a Sonata in B flat
major arranged as a duet; the latter pleased my sister Ottilie, who played it
with me, so much that I arranged it for orchestra. But another work of this
period, an Overture in B flat major, left an indelible impression on my mind
on account of an incident connected with it. This composition, in fact, was
the outcome of my study of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony in about the
same degree as Leubald und Adelaïde was the result of my study of
Shakespeare. I had made a special point of bringing out the mystic meaning
in the orchestra, which I divided into three distinctly different and opposite
Page 66
elements. I wanted to make the characteristic nature of these elements clear
to the score reader the moment he looked at it by a striking display of
colour, and only the fact that I could not get any green ink made this
picturesque idea impossible. I employed black ink for the brass instruments
alone, the strings were to have red and the wind green ink. This
extraordinary score I gave for perusal to Heinrich Dorn, who was at that
time musical director of the Leipzig theatre. He was very young, and
impressed me as being a very clever musician and a witty man of the world,
whom the Leipzig public made much of.
Nevertheless, I have never been able to understand how he could have
granted my request to produce this overture.
Some time afterwards I was rather inclined to believe with others, who
knew how much he enjoyed a good joke, that he intended to treat himself to
a little fun. At the time, however, he vowed that he thought the work
interesting, and maintained that if it were only brought out as a hitherto
unknown work by Beethoven, the public would receive it with respect,
though without understanding.
It was the Christmas of the fateful year 1830; as usual, there would be no
performance at the theatre on Christmas Eve, but instead a concert for the
poor had been organised, which received but scant support. The first item
on the programme was called by the exciting title ‘New Overture’—nothing
more! I had surreptitiously listened to the rehearsal with some misgiving. I
was very much impressed by the coolness with which Dorn fenced with the
apparent confusion which the members of the orchestra showed with regard
to this mysterious composition. The principal theme of the Allegro was
contained in four bars; after every fourth bar, however, a fifth bar had been
inserted, which had nothing to do with the melody, and which was
announced by a loud bang on the kettle-drum on the second beat. As this
drum-beat stood out alone, the drummer, who continually thought he was
making a mistake, got confused, and did not give the right sharpness to the
accent as prescribed by the score. Listening from my hidden corner, and
frightened at my original intention, this accidentally different rendering did
not displease me. To my genuine annoyance, however, Dorn called the
drummer to the front and insisted on his playing the accents with the
prescribed sharpness. When, after the rehearsal, I told the musical director
of my misgivings about this important fact, I could not get him to promise a
to the score reader the moment he looked at it by a striking display of
colour, and only the fact that I could not get any green ink made this
picturesque idea impossible. I employed black ink for the brass instruments
alone, the strings were to have red and the wind green ink. This
extraordinary score I gave for perusal to Heinrich Dorn, who was at that
time musical director of the Leipzig theatre. He was very young, and
impressed me as being a very clever musician and a witty man of the world,
whom the Leipzig public made much of.
Nevertheless, I have never been able to understand how he could have
granted my request to produce this overture.
Some time afterwards I was rather inclined to believe with others, who
knew how much he enjoyed a good joke, that he intended to treat himself to
a little fun. At the time, however, he vowed that he thought the work
interesting, and maintained that if it were only brought out as a hitherto
unknown work by Beethoven, the public would receive it with respect,
though without understanding.
It was the Christmas of the fateful year 1830; as usual, there would be no
performance at the theatre on Christmas Eve, but instead a concert for the
poor had been organised, which received but scant support. The first item
on the programme was called by the exciting title ‘New Overture’—nothing
more! I had surreptitiously listened to the rehearsal with some misgiving. I
was very much impressed by the coolness with which Dorn fenced with the
apparent confusion which the members of the orchestra showed with regard
to this mysterious composition. The principal theme of the Allegro was
contained in four bars; after every fourth bar, however, a fifth bar had been
inserted, which had nothing to do with the melody, and which was
announced by a loud bang on the kettle-drum on the second beat. As this
drum-beat stood out alone, the drummer, who continually thought he was
making a mistake, got confused, and did not give the right sharpness to the
accent as prescribed by the score. Listening from my hidden corner, and
frightened at my original intention, this accidentally different rendering did
not displease me. To my genuine annoyance, however, Dorn called the
drummer to the front and insisted on his playing the accents with the
prescribed sharpness. When, after the rehearsal, I told the musical director
of my misgivings about this important fact, I could not get him to promise a
Page 67
milder interpretation of the fatal drum-beat; he stuck to it that the thing
would sound very well as it was. In spite of this assurance my restlessness
grew, and I had not the courage to introduce myself to my friends in
advance as the author of the ‘New Overture.’
My sister Ottilie, who had already been forced to survive the secret
readings of Leubald und Adelaïde, was the only person willing to come
with me to hear my work. It was Christmas Eve, and there was to be the
usual Christmas tree, presents, etc., at my brother-in-law’s, Friedrich
Brockhaus, and both of us naturally wanted to be there. My sister, in
particular, who lived there, had a good deal to do with the arrangements,
and could only get away for a short while, and that with great difficulty; our
amiable relation accordingly had the carriage ready for her so that she
might get back more quickly. I made use of this opportunity to inaugurate,
as it were, my entree into the musical world in a festive manner. The
carriage drew up in front of the theatre. Ottilie went into my brother-in-
law’s box, which forced me to try and find a seat in the pit. I had forgotten
to buy a ticket, and was refused admission by the man at the door. Suddenly
the tuning up of the orchestra grew louder and louder, and I thought I
should have to miss the beginning of my work. In my anxiety I revealed
myself to the man at the door as the composer of the ‘New Overture,’ and in
this way succeeded in passing without a ticket. I pushed my way through to
one of the first rows of the pit, and sat down in terrible anxiety.
The Overture began: after the theme of the ‘black’ brass instruments had
made itself heard with great emphasis, the ‘red’ Allegro theme started, in
which, as I have already mentioned, every fifth bar was interrupted by the
drum-beat from the ‘black’ world. What kind of effect the ‘green’ theme of
the wind instruments, which joined in afterwards, produced upon the
listeners, and what they must have thought when ‘black,’ ‘red,’ and ‘green’
themes became intermingled, has always remained a mystery to me, for the
fatal drum-beat, brutally hammered out, entirely deprived me of my senses,
especially as this prolonged and continually recurring effect now began to
rouse, not only the attention, but the merriment of the audience. I heard my
neighbours calculating the return of this effect; knowing the absolute
correctness of their calculation, I suffered ten thousand torments, and
became almost unconscious. At last I awoke from my nightmare when the
Overture, to which I had disdained to give what I considered a trite ending,
came to a standstill most unexpectedly.
would sound very well as it was. In spite of this assurance my restlessness
grew, and I had not the courage to introduce myself to my friends in
advance as the author of the ‘New Overture.’
My sister Ottilie, who had already been forced to survive the secret
readings of Leubald und Adelaïde, was the only person willing to come
with me to hear my work. It was Christmas Eve, and there was to be the
usual Christmas tree, presents, etc., at my brother-in-law’s, Friedrich
Brockhaus, and both of us naturally wanted to be there. My sister, in
particular, who lived there, had a good deal to do with the arrangements,
and could only get away for a short while, and that with great difficulty; our
amiable relation accordingly had the carriage ready for her so that she
might get back more quickly. I made use of this opportunity to inaugurate,
as it were, my entree into the musical world in a festive manner. The
carriage drew up in front of the theatre. Ottilie went into my brother-in-
law’s box, which forced me to try and find a seat in the pit. I had forgotten
to buy a ticket, and was refused admission by the man at the door. Suddenly
the tuning up of the orchestra grew louder and louder, and I thought I
should have to miss the beginning of my work. In my anxiety I revealed
myself to the man at the door as the composer of the ‘New Overture,’ and in
this way succeeded in passing without a ticket. I pushed my way through to
one of the first rows of the pit, and sat down in terrible anxiety.
The Overture began: after the theme of the ‘black’ brass instruments had
made itself heard with great emphasis, the ‘red’ Allegro theme started, in
which, as I have already mentioned, every fifth bar was interrupted by the
drum-beat from the ‘black’ world. What kind of effect the ‘green’ theme of
the wind instruments, which joined in afterwards, produced upon the
listeners, and what they must have thought when ‘black,’ ‘red,’ and ‘green’
themes became intermingled, has always remained a mystery to me, for the
fatal drum-beat, brutally hammered out, entirely deprived me of my senses,
especially as this prolonged and continually recurring effect now began to
rouse, not only the attention, but the merriment of the audience. I heard my
neighbours calculating the return of this effect; knowing the absolute
correctness of their calculation, I suffered ten thousand torments, and
became almost unconscious. At last I awoke from my nightmare when the
Overture, to which I had disdained to give what I considered a trite ending,
came to a standstill most unexpectedly.
Page 68
No phantoms like those in Hoffmann’s Tales could have succeeded in
producing the extraordinary state in which I came to my senses on noticing
the astonishment of the audience at the end of the performance. I heard no
exclamations of disapproval, no hissing, no remarks, not even laughter; all I
saw was intense astonishment at such a strange occurrence, which
impressed them, as it did me, like a horrible nightmare. The worst moment,
however, came when I had to leave the pit and take my sister home. To get
up and pass through the people in the pit was horrible indeed. Nothing,
however, equalled the pain of coming face to face with the man at the door;
the strange look he gave me haunted me ever afterwards, and for a
considerable time I avoided the pit of the Leipzig theatre.
My next step was to find my sister, who had gone through the whole sad
experience with infinite pity; in silence we drove home to be present at a
brilliant family festivity, which contrasted with grim irony with the gloom
of my bewilderment.
In spite of it all I tried to believe in myself, and thought I could find
comfort in my overture to the Braut von Messina, which I believed to be a
better work than the fatal one I had just heard. A reinstatement, however,
was out of the question, for the directors of the Leipzig theatre regarded me
for a long time as a very doubtful person, in spite of Dorn’s friendship. It is
true that I still tried my hand at sketching out compositions to Goethe’s
Faust, some of which have been preserved to this day: but soon my wild
student’s life resumed its sway and drowned the last remnant of serious
musical study in me.
I now began to imagine that because I had become a student I ought to
attend the University lectures. From Traugott Krug, who was well known to
me on account of his having suppressed the student’s revolt, I tried to learn
the first principles of philosophy; a single lesson sufficed to make me give
this up. Two or three times, however, I attended the lectures on aesthetics
given by one of the younger professors, a man called Weiss. This
perseverance was due to the interest which Weiss immediately aroused in
me. When I made his acquaintance at my uncle Adolph’s house, Weiss had
just translated the metaphysics of Aristotle, and, if I am not mistaken,
dedicated them in a controversial spirit to Hegel.
On this occasion I had listened to the conversation of these two men on
philosophy and philosophers, which made a tremendous impression on me.
producing the extraordinary state in which I came to my senses on noticing
the astonishment of the audience at the end of the performance. I heard no
exclamations of disapproval, no hissing, no remarks, not even laughter; all I
saw was intense astonishment at such a strange occurrence, which
impressed them, as it did me, like a horrible nightmare. The worst moment,
however, came when I had to leave the pit and take my sister home. To get
up and pass through the people in the pit was horrible indeed. Nothing,
however, equalled the pain of coming face to face with the man at the door;
the strange look he gave me haunted me ever afterwards, and for a
considerable time I avoided the pit of the Leipzig theatre.
My next step was to find my sister, who had gone through the whole sad
experience with infinite pity; in silence we drove home to be present at a
brilliant family festivity, which contrasted with grim irony with the gloom
of my bewilderment.
In spite of it all I tried to believe in myself, and thought I could find
comfort in my overture to the Braut von Messina, which I believed to be a
better work than the fatal one I had just heard. A reinstatement, however,
was out of the question, for the directors of the Leipzig theatre regarded me
for a long time as a very doubtful person, in spite of Dorn’s friendship. It is
true that I still tried my hand at sketching out compositions to Goethe’s
Faust, some of which have been preserved to this day: but soon my wild
student’s life resumed its sway and drowned the last remnant of serious
musical study in me.
I now began to imagine that because I had become a student I ought to
attend the University lectures. From Traugott Krug, who was well known to
me on account of his having suppressed the student’s revolt, I tried to learn
the first principles of philosophy; a single lesson sufficed to make me give
this up. Two or three times, however, I attended the lectures on aesthetics
given by one of the younger professors, a man called Weiss. This
perseverance was due to the interest which Weiss immediately aroused in
me. When I made his acquaintance at my uncle Adolph’s house, Weiss had
just translated the metaphysics of Aristotle, and, if I am not mistaken,
dedicated them in a controversial spirit to Hegel.
On this occasion I had listened to the conversation of these two men on
philosophy and philosophers, which made a tremendous impression on me.
Page 69
I remember that Weiss was an absent-minded man, with a hasty and abrupt
manner of speaking; he had an interesting and pensive expression which
impressed me immensely. I recollect how, on being accused of a want of
clearness in his writing and style, he justified himself by saying that the
deep problems of the human mind could not in any case be solved by the
mob. This maxim, which struck me as being very plausible, I at once
accepted as the principle for all my future writing. I remember that my
eldest brother Albert, to whom I once had to write for my mother, grew so
disgusted with my letter and style that he said he thought I must be going
mad.
In spite of my hopes that Weiss’s lectures would do me much good, I was
not capable of continuing to attend them, as my desires in those days drove
me to anything but the study of aesthetics. Nevertheless, my mother’s
anxiety at this time on my behalf made me try to take up music again. As
Muller, the teacher under whom I had studied till that time, had not been
able to inspire me with a permanent love of study, it was necessary to
discover whether another teacher might not be better able to induce me to
do serious work.
Theodor Weinlich, who was choirmaster and musical director at St.
Thomas’s Church, held at that time this important and ancient post which
was afterwards occupied by Schicht, and before him by no less a person
than Sebastian Bach. By education he belonged to the old Italian school of
music, and had studied in Bologna under Pater Martini. He had made a
name for himself in this art by his vocal compositions, in which his fine
manner of treating the parts was much praised. He himself told me one day
that a Leipzig publisher had offered him a very substantial fee if he would
write for his firm another book of vocal exercises similar to the one which
had proved so profitable to his first publisher. Weinlich told him that he had
not got any exercises of the kind ready at the moment, but offered him
instead a new Mass, which the publisher refused with the words: ‘Let him
who got the meat gnaw the bones.’ The modesty with which Weinlich told
me this little story showed how excellent a man he was. As he was in a very
bad and weak state of health when my mother introduced me to him, he at
first refused to take me as a pupil. But, after having resisted all persuasions,
he at last took pity on my musical education, which, as he soon discovered
from a fugue which I had brought with me, was exceedingly faulty. He
accordingly promised to teach me, on condition that I should give up all
manner of speaking; he had an interesting and pensive expression which
impressed me immensely. I recollect how, on being accused of a want of
clearness in his writing and style, he justified himself by saying that the
deep problems of the human mind could not in any case be solved by the
mob. This maxim, which struck me as being very plausible, I at once
accepted as the principle for all my future writing. I remember that my
eldest brother Albert, to whom I once had to write for my mother, grew so
disgusted with my letter and style that he said he thought I must be going
mad.
In spite of my hopes that Weiss’s lectures would do me much good, I was
not capable of continuing to attend them, as my desires in those days drove
me to anything but the study of aesthetics. Nevertheless, my mother’s
anxiety at this time on my behalf made me try to take up music again. As
Muller, the teacher under whom I had studied till that time, had not been
able to inspire me with a permanent love of study, it was necessary to
discover whether another teacher might not be better able to induce me to
do serious work.
Theodor Weinlich, who was choirmaster and musical director at St.
Thomas’s Church, held at that time this important and ancient post which
was afterwards occupied by Schicht, and before him by no less a person
than Sebastian Bach. By education he belonged to the old Italian school of
music, and had studied in Bologna under Pater Martini. He had made a
name for himself in this art by his vocal compositions, in which his fine
manner of treating the parts was much praised. He himself told me one day
that a Leipzig publisher had offered him a very substantial fee if he would
write for his firm another book of vocal exercises similar to the one which
had proved so profitable to his first publisher. Weinlich told him that he had
not got any exercises of the kind ready at the moment, but offered him
instead a new Mass, which the publisher refused with the words: ‘Let him
who got the meat gnaw the bones.’ The modesty with which Weinlich told
me this little story showed how excellent a man he was. As he was in a very
bad and weak state of health when my mother introduced me to him, he at
first refused to take me as a pupil. But, after having resisted all persuasions,
he at last took pity on my musical education, which, as he soon discovered
from a fugue which I had brought with me, was exceedingly faulty. He
accordingly promised to teach me, on condition that I should give up all
Page 70
attempts at composing for six months, and follow his instructions implicitly.
To the first part of my promise I remained faithful, thanks to the vast vortex
of dissipation into which my life as a student had drawn me.
When, however, I had to occupy myself for any length of time with
nothing but four-part harmony exercises in strictly rigorous style, it was not
only the student in me, but also the composer of so many overtures and
sonatas, that was thoroughly disgusted. Weinlich, too, had his grievances
against me, and decided to give me up.
During this period I came to the crisis of my life, which led to the
catastrophe of that terrible evening at the gambling den. But an even greater
blow than this fearful experience awaited me when Weinlich decided not to
have anything more to do with me. Deeply humiliated and miserable, I
besought the gentle old man, whom I loved dearly, to forgive me, and I
promised him from that moment to work with unflagging energy. One
morning at seven o’clock Weinlich sent for me to begin the rough sketch for
a fugue; he devoted the whole morning to me, following my work bar by
bar with the greatest attention, and giving me his valuable advice. At twelve
o’clock he dismissed me with the instruction to perfect and finish the sketch
by filling in the remaining parts at home.
When I brought him the fugue finished, he handed me his own treatment
of the same theme for comparison. This common task of fugue writing
established between me and my good-natured teacher the tenderest of ties,
for, from that moment, we both enjoyed the lessons. I was astonished how
quickly the time flew. In eight weeks I had not only gone through a number
of the most intricate fugues, but had also waded through all kinds of
difficult evolutions in counterpoint, when one day, on bringing him an
extremely elaborate double fugue, he took my breath away by telling me
that after this there was nothing left for him to teach me.
As I was not aware of any great effort on my part, I often wondered
whether I had really become a well-equipped musician. Weinlich himself
did not seem to attach much importance to what he had taught me: he said,
‘Probably you will never write fugues or canons; but what you have
mastered is Independence: you can now stand alone and rely upon having a
fine technique at your fingers’ ends if you should want it.’
The principal result of his influence over me was certainly the growing
love of clearness and fluency to which he had trained me. I had already had
To the first part of my promise I remained faithful, thanks to the vast vortex
of dissipation into which my life as a student had drawn me.
When, however, I had to occupy myself for any length of time with
nothing but four-part harmony exercises in strictly rigorous style, it was not
only the student in me, but also the composer of so many overtures and
sonatas, that was thoroughly disgusted. Weinlich, too, had his grievances
against me, and decided to give me up.
During this period I came to the crisis of my life, which led to the
catastrophe of that terrible evening at the gambling den. But an even greater
blow than this fearful experience awaited me when Weinlich decided not to
have anything more to do with me. Deeply humiliated and miserable, I
besought the gentle old man, whom I loved dearly, to forgive me, and I
promised him from that moment to work with unflagging energy. One
morning at seven o’clock Weinlich sent for me to begin the rough sketch for
a fugue; he devoted the whole morning to me, following my work bar by
bar with the greatest attention, and giving me his valuable advice. At twelve
o’clock he dismissed me with the instruction to perfect and finish the sketch
by filling in the remaining parts at home.
When I brought him the fugue finished, he handed me his own treatment
of the same theme for comparison. This common task of fugue writing
established between me and my good-natured teacher the tenderest of ties,
for, from that moment, we both enjoyed the lessons. I was astonished how
quickly the time flew. In eight weeks I had not only gone through a number
of the most intricate fugues, but had also waded through all kinds of
difficult evolutions in counterpoint, when one day, on bringing him an
extremely elaborate double fugue, he took my breath away by telling me
that after this there was nothing left for him to teach me.
As I was not aware of any great effort on my part, I often wondered
whether I had really become a well-equipped musician. Weinlich himself
did not seem to attach much importance to what he had taught me: he said,
‘Probably you will never write fugues or canons; but what you have
mastered is Independence: you can now stand alone and rely upon having a
fine technique at your fingers’ ends if you should want it.’
The principal result of his influence over me was certainly the growing
love of clearness and fluency to which he had trained me. I had already had
Page 71
to write the above-mentioned fugue for ordinary voices; my feeling for the
melodious and vocal had in this way been awakened. In order to keep me
strictly under his calming and friendly influence, he had at the same time
given me a sonata to write which, as a proof of my friendship for him, I had
to build up on strictly harmonic and thematic lines, for which he
recommended me a very early and childlike sonata by Pleyel as a model.
Those who had only recently heard my Overture must, indeed, have
wondered how I ever wrote this sonata, which has been published through
the indiscretion of Messrs. Breitkopf and Hartel (to reward me for my
abstemiousness, Weinlich induced them to publish this poor composition).
From that moment he gave me a free hand. To begin with I was allowed to
compose a Fantasia for the pianoforte (in F sharp minor) which I wrote in a
quite informal style by treating the melody in recitative form; this gave me
intense satisfaction because it won me praise from Weinlich.
Soon afterwards I wrote three overtures which all met with his entire
approval. In the following winter (1831-1832) I succeeded in getting the
first of them, in D minor, performed at one of the Gewandhaus concerts.
At that time a very simple and homely tone reigned supreme in this
institution. The instrumental works were not conducted by what we call ‘a
conductor of the orchestra,’ but were simply played to the audience by the
leader of the orchestra. As soon as the singing began, Pohlenz took his place
at the conductor’s desk; he belonged to the type of fat and pleasant musical
directors, and was a great favourite with the Leipzig public. He used to
come on the platform with a very important-looking blue baton in his hand.
One of the strangest events which occurred at that time was the yearly
production of the Ninth Symphony of Beethoven; after the first three
movements had been played straight through like a Haydn symphony, as
well as the orchestra could manage it, Pohlenz, instead of having to conduct
a vocal quartette, a cantata, or an Italian aria, took his place at the desk to
undertake this highly complicated instrumental work, with its particularly
enigmatical and incoherent opening, one of the most difficult tasks that
could possibly be found for a musical conductor. I shall never forget the
impression produced upon me at the first rehearsal by the anxiously and
carefully played 3/4 time, and the way in which the wild shrieks of the
trumpet (with which this movement begins) resulted in the most
extraordinary confusion of sound.
melodious and vocal had in this way been awakened. In order to keep me
strictly under his calming and friendly influence, he had at the same time
given me a sonata to write which, as a proof of my friendship for him, I had
to build up on strictly harmonic and thematic lines, for which he
recommended me a very early and childlike sonata by Pleyel as a model.
Those who had only recently heard my Overture must, indeed, have
wondered how I ever wrote this sonata, which has been published through
the indiscretion of Messrs. Breitkopf and Hartel (to reward me for my
abstemiousness, Weinlich induced them to publish this poor composition).
From that moment he gave me a free hand. To begin with I was allowed to
compose a Fantasia for the pianoforte (in F sharp minor) which I wrote in a
quite informal style by treating the melody in recitative form; this gave me
intense satisfaction because it won me praise from Weinlich.
Soon afterwards I wrote three overtures which all met with his entire
approval. In the following winter (1831-1832) I succeeded in getting the
first of them, in D minor, performed at one of the Gewandhaus concerts.
At that time a very simple and homely tone reigned supreme in this
institution. The instrumental works were not conducted by what we call ‘a
conductor of the orchestra,’ but were simply played to the audience by the
leader of the orchestra. As soon as the singing began, Pohlenz took his place
at the conductor’s desk; he belonged to the type of fat and pleasant musical
directors, and was a great favourite with the Leipzig public. He used to
come on the platform with a very important-looking blue baton in his hand.
One of the strangest events which occurred at that time was the yearly
production of the Ninth Symphony of Beethoven; after the first three
movements had been played straight through like a Haydn symphony, as
well as the orchestra could manage it, Pohlenz, instead of having to conduct
a vocal quartette, a cantata, or an Italian aria, took his place at the desk to
undertake this highly complicated instrumental work, with its particularly
enigmatical and incoherent opening, one of the most difficult tasks that
could possibly be found for a musical conductor. I shall never forget the
impression produced upon me at the first rehearsal by the anxiously and
carefully played 3/4 time, and the way in which the wild shrieks of the
trumpet (with which this movement begins) resulted in the most
extraordinary confusion of sound.
Page 72
He had evidently chosen this tempo in order, in some way, to manage the
recitative of the double basses; but it was utterly hopeless. Pohlenz was in a
bath of perspiration, the recitative did not come off, and I really began to
think that Beethoven must have written nonsense; the double bass player,
Temmler, a faithful veteran of the orchestra, prevailed upon Pohlenz at last,
in rather coarse and energetic language, to put down the baton, and in this
way the recitative really proceeded properly. All the same, I felt at this time
that I had come to the humble conclusion, in a way I can hardly explain,
that this extraordinary work was still beyond my comprehension. For a long
time I gave up brooding over this composition, and I turned my thoughts
with simple longing towards a clearer and calmer musical form.
My study of counterpoint had taught me to appreciate, above all,
Mozart’s light and flowing treatment of the most difficult technical
problems, and the last movement of his great Symphony in C major in
particular served me as example for my own work. My D minor Overture,
which clearly showed the influence of Beethoven’s Coriolanus Overture,
had been favourably received by the public; my mother began to have faith
in me again, and I started at once on a second overture (in C major), which
really ended with a ‘Fugato’ that did more credit to my new model than I
had ever hoped to accomplish.
This overture, also, was soon afterwards performed at a recital given by
the favourite singer, Mlle. Palazzesi (of the Dresden Italian Opera). Before
this I had already introduced it at a concert given by a private musical
society called ‘Euterpe’, when I had conducted it myself.
I remember the strange impression I received from a remark that my
mother made on that occasion; as a matter of fact this work, which was
written in a counterpoint style, without any real passion or emotion, had
produced a strange effect upon her. She gave vent to her astonishment by
warmly praising the Egmont Overture, which was played at the same
concert, maintaining that ‘this kind of music was after all more fascinating
than any stupid fugue.’
At this time I also wrote (as my third opus) an overture to Raupach’s
drama, Konig Enzio, in which again Beethoven’s influence made itself even
more strongly felt. My sister Rosalie succeeded in getting it performed at
the theatre before the play; for the sake of prudence they did not announce
it on the programme the first time. Dorn conducted it, and as the
recitative of the double basses; but it was utterly hopeless. Pohlenz was in a
bath of perspiration, the recitative did not come off, and I really began to
think that Beethoven must have written nonsense; the double bass player,
Temmler, a faithful veteran of the orchestra, prevailed upon Pohlenz at last,
in rather coarse and energetic language, to put down the baton, and in this
way the recitative really proceeded properly. All the same, I felt at this time
that I had come to the humble conclusion, in a way I can hardly explain,
that this extraordinary work was still beyond my comprehension. For a long
time I gave up brooding over this composition, and I turned my thoughts
with simple longing towards a clearer and calmer musical form.
My study of counterpoint had taught me to appreciate, above all,
Mozart’s light and flowing treatment of the most difficult technical
problems, and the last movement of his great Symphony in C major in
particular served me as example for my own work. My D minor Overture,
which clearly showed the influence of Beethoven’s Coriolanus Overture,
had been favourably received by the public; my mother began to have faith
in me again, and I started at once on a second overture (in C major), which
really ended with a ‘Fugato’ that did more credit to my new model than I
had ever hoped to accomplish.
This overture, also, was soon afterwards performed at a recital given by
the favourite singer, Mlle. Palazzesi (of the Dresden Italian Opera). Before
this I had already introduced it at a concert given by a private musical
society called ‘Euterpe’, when I had conducted it myself.
I remember the strange impression I received from a remark that my
mother made on that occasion; as a matter of fact this work, which was
written in a counterpoint style, without any real passion or emotion, had
produced a strange effect upon her. She gave vent to her astonishment by
warmly praising the Egmont Overture, which was played at the same
concert, maintaining that ‘this kind of music was after all more fascinating
than any stupid fugue.’
At this time I also wrote (as my third opus) an overture to Raupach’s
drama, Konig Enzio, in which again Beethoven’s influence made itself even
more strongly felt. My sister Rosalie succeeded in getting it performed at
the theatre before the play; for the sake of prudence they did not announce
it on the programme the first time. Dorn conducted it, and as the
Page 73
performance went off all right, and the public showed no dissatisfaction, my
overture was played with my full name on the programme several times
during the run of the above-mentioned drama.
After this I tried my hand at a big Symphony (in C major); in this work I
showed what I had learnt by using the influence of my study of Beethoven
and Mozart towards the achievement of a really pleasant and intelligible
work, in which the fugue was again present at the end, while the themes of
the various movements were so constructed that they could be played
consecutively.
Nevertheless, the passionate and bold element of the Sinfonia Eroica was
distinctly discernible, especially in the first movement. The slow
movement, on the contrary, contained reminiscences of my former musical
mysticism. A kind of repeated interrogative exclamation of the minor third
merging into the fifth connected in my mind this work (which I had finished
with the utmost effort at clearness) with my very earliest period of boyish
sentimentality.
When, in the following year, I called on Friedrich Rochlitz, at that time
the ‘Nestor’ of the musical aesthetes in Leipzig, and president of the
Gewandhaus, I prevailed upon him to promise me a performance of my
work. As he had been given my score for perusal before seeing me, he was
quite astonished to find that I was a very young man, for the character of
my music had prepared him to see a much older and more experienced
musician. Before this performance took place many things happened which
I must first mention, as they were of great importance to my life.
My short and stormy career as a student had drowned in me not only all
longing for further development, but also all interest in intellectual and
spiritual pursuits. Although, as I have pointed out, I had never alienated
myself entirely from music, my revived interest in politics aroused my first
real disgust for my senseless student’s life, which soon left no deeper traces
on my mind than the remembrance of a terrible nightmare.
The Polish War of Independence against Russian supremacy filled me
with growing enthusiasm. The victories which the Poles obtained for a short
period during May, 1831, aroused my enthusiastic admiration: it seemed to
me as though the world had, by some miracle, been created anew. As a
contrast to this, the news of the battle of Ostrolenka made it appear as if the
end of the world had come. To my astonishment, my boon companions
overture was played with my full name on the programme several times
during the run of the above-mentioned drama.
After this I tried my hand at a big Symphony (in C major); in this work I
showed what I had learnt by using the influence of my study of Beethoven
and Mozart towards the achievement of a really pleasant and intelligible
work, in which the fugue was again present at the end, while the themes of
the various movements were so constructed that they could be played
consecutively.
Nevertheless, the passionate and bold element of the Sinfonia Eroica was
distinctly discernible, especially in the first movement. The slow
movement, on the contrary, contained reminiscences of my former musical
mysticism. A kind of repeated interrogative exclamation of the minor third
merging into the fifth connected in my mind this work (which I had finished
with the utmost effort at clearness) with my very earliest period of boyish
sentimentality.
When, in the following year, I called on Friedrich Rochlitz, at that time
the ‘Nestor’ of the musical aesthetes in Leipzig, and president of the
Gewandhaus, I prevailed upon him to promise me a performance of my
work. As he had been given my score for perusal before seeing me, he was
quite astonished to find that I was a very young man, for the character of
my music had prepared him to see a much older and more experienced
musician. Before this performance took place many things happened which
I must first mention, as they were of great importance to my life.
My short and stormy career as a student had drowned in me not only all
longing for further development, but also all interest in intellectual and
spiritual pursuits. Although, as I have pointed out, I had never alienated
myself entirely from music, my revived interest in politics aroused my first
real disgust for my senseless student’s life, which soon left no deeper traces
on my mind than the remembrance of a terrible nightmare.
The Polish War of Independence against Russian supremacy filled me
with growing enthusiasm. The victories which the Poles obtained for a short
period during May, 1831, aroused my enthusiastic admiration: it seemed to
me as though the world had, by some miracle, been created anew. As a
contrast to this, the news of the battle of Ostrolenka made it appear as if the
end of the world had come. To my astonishment, my boon companions
Page 74
scoffed at me when I commented upon some of these events; the terrible
lack of all fellow-feeling and comradeship amongst the students struck me
very forcibly. Any kind of enthusiasm had to be smothered or turned into
pedantic bravado, which showed itself in the form of affectation and
indifference. To get drunk with deliberate cold-bloodedness, without even a
glimpse of humour, was reckoned almost as brave a feat as duelling. Not
until much later did I understand the far nobler spirit which animated the
lower classes in Germany in comparison with the sadly degenerate state of
the University students. In those days I felt terribly indignant at the
insulting remarks which I brought upon myself when I deplored the battle
of Ostrolenka.
To my honour be it said, that these and similar impressions helped to
make me give up my low associates. During my studies with Weinlich the
only little dissipation I allowed myself was my daily evening visit to
Kintschy, the confectioner in the Klostergasse, where I passionately
devoured the latest newspapers. Here I found many men who held the same
political views as myself, and I specially loved to listen to the eager
political discussions of some of the old men who frequented the place. The
literary journals, too, began to interest me; I read a great deal, but was not
very particular in my choice. Nevertheless, I now began to appreciate
intelligence and wit, whereas before only the grotesque and the fantastic
had had any attraction for me.
My interest in the issue of the Polish war, however, remained paramount.
I felt the siege and capture of Warsaw as a personal calamity. My
excitement when the remains of the Polish army began to pass through
Leipzig on their way to France was indescribable, and I shall never forget
the impression produced upon me by the first batch of these unfortunate
soldiers on the occasion of their being quartered at the Green Shield, a
public-house in the Meat Market. Much as this depressed me, I was soon
roused to a high pitch of enthusiasm, for in the lounge of the Leipzig
Gewandhaus, where that night Beethoven’s C minor Symphony was being
played, a group of heroic figures, the principal leaders of the Polish
revolution, excited my admiration. I felt more particularly attracted by
Count Vincenz Tyszkiewitcz, a man of exceptionally powerful physique and
noble appearance, who impressed me by his dignified and aristocratic
manner and his quiet self-reliance—qualities with which I had not met
before. When I saw a man of such kingly bearing in a tight-fitting coat and
lack of all fellow-feeling and comradeship amongst the students struck me
very forcibly. Any kind of enthusiasm had to be smothered or turned into
pedantic bravado, which showed itself in the form of affectation and
indifference. To get drunk with deliberate cold-bloodedness, without even a
glimpse of humour, was reckoned almost as brave a feat as duelling. Not
until much later did I understand the far nobler spirit which animated the
lower classes in Germany in comparison with the sadly degenerate state of
the University students. In those days I felt terribly indignant at the
insulting remarks which I brought upon myself when I deplored the battle
of Ostrolenka.
To my honour be it said, that these and similar impressions helped to
make me give up my low associates. During my studies with Weinlich the
only little dissipation I allowed myself was my daily evening visit to
Kintschy, the confectioner in the Klostergasse, where I passionately
devoured the latest newspapers. Here I found many men who held the same
political views as myself, and I specially loved to listen to the eager
political discussions of some of the old men who frequented the place. The
literary journals, too, began to interest me; I read a great deal, but was not
very particular in my choice. Nevertheless, I now began to appreciate
intelligence and wit, whereas before only the grotesque and the fantastic
had had any attraction for me.
My interest in the issue of the Polish war, however, remained paramount.
I felt the siege and capture of Warsaw as a personal calamity. My
excitement when the remains of the Polish army began to pass through
Leipzig on their way to France was indescribable, and I shall never forget
the impression produced upon me by the first batch of these unfortunate
soldiers on the occasion of their being quartered at the Green Shield, a
public-house in the Meat Market. Much as this depressed me, I was soon
roused to a high pitch of enthusiasm, for in the lounge of the Leipzig
Gewandhaus, where that night Beethoven’s C minor Symphony was being
played, a group of heroic figures, the principal leaders of the Polish
revolution, excited my admiration. I felt more particularly attracted by
Count Vincenz Tyszkiewitcz, a man of exceptionally powerful physique and
noble appearance, who impressed me by his dignified and aristocratic
manner and his quiet self-reliance—qualities with which I had not met
before. When I saw a man of such kingly bearing in a tight-fitting coat and
Page 75
red velvet cap, I at once realised my foolishness in ever having worshipped
the ludicrously dressed up little heroes of our students’ world. I was
delighted to meet this gentleman again at the house of my brother-in-law,
Friedrich Brockhaus, where I saw him frequently.
My brother-in-law had the greatest pity and sympathy for the Polish
rebels, and was the president of a committee whose task it was to look after
their interests, and for a long time he made many personal sacrifices for
their cause.
The Brockhaus establishment now became tremendously attractive to me.
Around Count Vincenz Tyszkiewitcz, who remained the lodestar of this
small Polish world, gathered a great many other wealthy exiles, amongst
whom I chiefly remember a cavalry captain of the name of Bansemer, a
man of unlimited kindness, but of a rather frivolous nature; he possessed a
marvellous team of four horses which he drove at such breakneck speed as
to cause great annoyance to the people of Leipzig. Another man of
importance with whom I remember dining was General Bem, whose
artillery had made such a gallant stand at Ostrolenka.
Many other exiles passed through this hospitable house, some of whom
impressed us by their melancholy, warlike bearing, others by their refined
behaviour. Vincenz Tyszkiewitcz, however, remained my ideal of a true
man, and I loved him with a profound adoration. He, too, began to be
interested in me; I used to call upon him nearly every day, and was
sometimes present at a sort of martial feast, from which he often withdrew
in order to be able to open his heart to me about the anxieties which
oppressed him. He had, in fact, received absolutely no news of the
whereabouts of his wife and little son since they separated at Volhynien.
Besides this, he was under the shadow of a great sorrow which drew all
sympathetic natures to him. To my sister Louise he had confided the terrible
calamity that had once befallen him. He had been married before, and while
staying with his wife in one of his lonely castles, in the dead of night he had
seen a ghostly apparition at the window of his bedroom. Hearing his name
called several times, he had taken up a revolver to protect himself from
possible danger, and had shot his own wife, who had had the eccentric idea
of teasing him by pretending to be a ghost. I had the pleasure of sharing his
joy on hearing that his family was safe. His wife joined him in Leipzig with
their beautiful boy, Janusz. I felt sorry not to be able to feel the same
the ludicrously dressed up little heroes of our students’ world. I was
delighted to meet this gentleman again at the house of my brother-in-law,
Friedrich Brockhaus, where I saw him frequently.
My brother-in-law had the greatest pity and sympathy for the Polish
rebels, and was the president of a committee whose task it was to look after
their interests, and for a long time he made many personal sacrifices for
their cause.
The Brockhaus establishment now became tremendously attractive to me.
Around Count Vincenz Tyszkiewitcz, who remained the lodestar of this
small Polish world, gathered a great many other wealthy exiles, amongst
whom I chiefly remember a cavalry captain of the name of Bansemer, a
man of unlimited kindness, but of a rather frivolous nature; he possessed a
marvellous team of four horses which he drove at such breakneck speed as
to cause great annoyance to the people of Leipzig. Another man of
importance with whom I remember dining was General Bem, whose
artillery had made such a gallant stand at Ostrolenka.
Many other exiles passed through this hospitable house, some of whom
impressed us by their melancholy, warlike bearing, others by their refined
behaviour. Vincenz Tyszkiewitcz, however, remained my ideal of a true
man, and I loved him with a profound adoration. He, too, began to be
interested in me; I used to call upon him nearly every day, and was
sometimes present at a sort of martial feast, from which he often withdrew
in order to be able to open his heart to me about the anxieties which
oppressed him. He had, in fact, received absolutely no news of the
whereabouts of his wife and little son since they separated at Volhynien.
Besides this, he was under the shadow of a great sorrow which drew all
sympathetic natures to him. To my sister Louise he had confided the terrible
calamity that had once befallen him. He had been married before, and while
staying with his wife in one of his lonely castles, in the dead of night he had
seen a ghostly apparition at the window of his bedroom. Hearing his name
called several times, he had taken up a revolver to protect himself from
possible danger, and had shot his own wife, who had had the eccentric idea
of teasing him by pretending to be a ghost. I had the pleasure of sharing his
joy on hearing that his family was safe. His wife joined him in Leipzig with
their beautiful boy, Janusz. I felt sorry not to be able to feel the same
Page 76
sympathy for this lady as I did for her husband; perhaps one of the reasons
of my antipathy was the obvious and conspicuous way in which she made
herself up, by means of which the poor woman probably tried to hide how
much her beauty had suffered through the terrible strain of the past events.
She soon went back to Galicia to try and save what she could of their
property, and also to provide her husband with a pass from the Austrian
Government, by means of which he could follow her.
Then came the third of May. Eighteen of the Poles who were still in
Leipzig met together at a festive dinner in a hotel outside the town; on this
day was to be celebrated the first anniversary of the third of May, so dear to
the memory of the Poles. Only the chiefs of the Leipzig Polish Committee
received invitations, and as a special favour I also was asked. I shall never
forget that occasion. The dinner became an orgy; throughout the evening a
brass band from the town played Polish folksongs, and these were sung by
the whole company, led by a Lithuanian called Zan, in a manner now
triumphant and now mournful. The beautiful ‘Third of May’ song more
particularly drew forth a positive uproar of enthusiasm. Tears and shouts of
joy grew into a terrible tumult; the excited men grouped themselves on the
grass swearing eternal friendship in the most extravagant terms, for which
the word ‘Oiczisna’ (Fatherland) provided the principal theme, until at last
night threw her veil over this wild debauch.
That evening afterwards served me as the theme for an orchestral
composition (in the form of an overture) named Polonia; I shall recount the
fate of this work later on. My friend Tyszkiewitcz’s passport now arrived,
and he made up his mind to go back to Galicia via Brunn, although his
friends considered it was very rash of him to do so. I very much wanted to
see something of the world, and Tyszkiewitcz’s offer to take me with him,
induced my mother to consent to my going to Vienna, a place that I had
long wished to visit. I took with me the scores of my three overtures which
had already been performed, and also that of my great symphony as yet
unproduced, and had a grand time with my Polish patron, who took me in
his luxurious travelling-coach as far as the capital of Moravia. During a
short stop at Dresden the exiles of all classes gave our beloved Count a
friendly farewell dinner in Pirna, at which the champagne flowed freely,
while the health was drunk of the future ‘Dictator of Poland.’
of my antipathy was the obvious and conspicuous way in which she made
herself up, by means of which the poor woman probably tried to hide how
much her beauty had suffered through the terrible strain of the past events.
She soon went back to Galicia to try and save what she could of their
property, and also to provide her husband with a pass from the Austrian
Government, by means of which he could follow her.
Then came the third of May. Eighteen of the Poles who were still in
Leipzig met together at a festive dinner in a hotel outside the town; on this
day was to be celebrated the first anniversary of the third of May, so dear to
the memory of the Poles. Only the chiefs of the Leipzig Polish Committee
received invitations, and as a special favour I also was asked. I shall never
forget that occasion. The dinner became an orgy; throughout the evening a
brass band from the town played Polish folksongs, and these were sung by
the whole company, led by a Lithuanian called Zan, in a manner now
triumphant and now mournful. The beautiful ‘Third of May’ song more
particularly drew forth a positive uproar of enthusiasm. Tears and shouts of
joy grew into a terrible tumult; the excited men grouped themselves on the
grass swearing eternal friendship in the most extravagant terms, for which
the word ‘Oiczisna’ (Fatherland) provided the principal theme, until at last
night threw her veil over this wild debauch.
That evening afterwards served me as the theme for an orchestral
composition (in the form of an overture) named Polonia; I shall recount the
fate of this work later on. My friend Tyszkiewitcz’s passport now arrived,
and he made up his mind to go back to Galicia via Brunn, although his
friends considered it was very rash of him to do so. I very much wanted to
see something of the world, and Tyszkiewitcz’s offer to take me with him,
induced my mother to consent to my going to Vienna, a place that I had
long wished to visit. I took with me the scores of my three overtures which
had already been performed, and also that of my great symphony as yet
unproduced, and had a grand time with my Polish patron, who took me in
his luxurious travelling-coach as far as the capital of Moravia. During a
short stop at Dresden the exiles of all classes gave our beloved Count a
friendly farewell dinner in Pirna, at which the champagne flowed freely,
while the health was drunk of the future ‘Dictator of Poland.’
Page 77
At last we separated at Brunn, from which place I continued my journey
to Vienna by coach. During the afternoon and night, which I was obliged to
spend in Brunn by myself, I went through terrible agonies from fear of the
cholera which, as I unexpectedly heard, had broken out in this place. There
I was all alone in a strange place, my faithful friend just departed, and on
hearing of the epidemic I felt as if a malicious demon had caught me in his
snare in order to annihilate me. I did not betray my terror to the people in
the hotel, but when I was shown into a very lonely wing of the house and
left by myself in this wilderness, I hid myself in bed with my clothes on,
and lived once again through all the horrors of ghost stories as I had done in
my boyhood. The cholera stood before me like a living thing; I could see
and touch it; it lay in my bed and embraced me. My limbs turned to ice, I
felt frozen to the very marrow. Whether I was awake or asleep I never
knew; I only remember how astonished I was when, on awakening, I felt
thoroughly well and healthy.
At last I arrived in Vienna, where I escaped the epidemic which had
penetrated as far as that town. It was midsummer of the year 1832. Owing
to the introductions I had with me, I found myself very much at home in
this lively city, in which I made a pleasant stay of six weeks. As my
sojourn, however, had no really practical purpose, my mother looked upon
the cost of this holiday, short as it seemed, as an unnecessary extravagance
on my part. I visited the theatres, heard Strauss, made excursions, and
altogether had a very good time. I am afraid I contracted a few debts as
well, which I paid off later on when I was conductor of the Dresden
orchestra. I had received very pleasant impressions of musical and theatrical
life, and for a long time Vienna lived in my memory as the acme of that
extraordinarily productive spirit peculiar to its people. I enjoyed most of all
the performances at the Theater an der Wien, at which they were acting a
grotesque fairy play called Die Abenteuer Fortunat’s zu Wasser und zu
Land, in which a cab was called on the shores of the Black Sea and which
made a tremendous impression on me. About the music I was more
doubtful. A young friend of mine took me with immense pride to a
performance of Gluck’s Iphigenia in Tauris, which was made doubly
attractive by a first-rate cast including Wild, Staudigl and Binder: I must
confess that on the whole I was bored by this work, but I did not dare say
so. My ideas of Gluck had attained gigantic proportions from my reading of
Hoffmann’s well-known Phantasies; my anticipation of this work therefore,
to Vienna by coach. During the afternoon and night, which I was obliged to
spend in Brunn by myself, I went through terrible agonies from fear of the
cholera which, as I unexpectedly heard, had broken out in this place. There
I was all alone in a strange place, my faithful friend just departed, and on
hearing of the epidemic I felt as if a malicious demon had caught me in his
snare in order to annihilate me. I did not betray my terror to the people in
the hotel, but when I was shown into a very lonely wing of the house and
left by myself in this wilderness, I hid myself in bed with my clothes on,
and lived once again through all the horrors of ghost stories as I had done in
my boyhood. The cholera stood before me like a living thing; I could see
and touch it; it lay in my bed and embraced me. My limbs turned to ice, I
felt frozen to the very marrow. Whether I was awake or asleep I never
knew; I only remember how astonished I was when, on awakening, I felt
thoroughly well and healthy.
At last I arrived in Vienna, where I escaped the epidemic which had
penetrated as far as that town. It was midsummer of the year 1832. Owing
to the introductions I had with me, I found myself very much at home in
this lively city, in which I made a pleasant stay of six weeks. As my
sojourn, however, had no really practical purpose, my mother looked upon
the cost of this holiday, short as it seemed, as an unnecessary extravagance
on my part. I visited the theatres, heard Strauss, made excursions, and
altogether had a very good time. I am afraid I contracted a few debts as
well, which I paid off later on when I was conductor of the Dresden
orchestra. I had received very pleasant impressions of musical and theatrical
life, and for a long time Vienna lived in my memory as the acme of that
extraordinarily productive spirit peculiar to its people. I enjoyed most of all
the performances at the Theater an der Wien, at which they were acting a
grotesque fairy play called Die Abenteuer Fortunat’s zu Wasser und zu
Land, in which a cab was called on the shores of the Black Sea and which
made a tremendous impression on me. About the music I was more
doubtful. A young friend of mine took me with immense pride to a
performance of Gluck’s Iphigenia in Tauris, which was made doubly
attractive by a first-rate cast including Wild, Staudigl and Binder: I must
confess that on the whole I was bored by this work, but I did not dare say
so. My ideas of Gluck had attained gigantic proportions from my reading of
Hoffmann’s well-known Phantasies; my anticipation of this work therefore,
Page 78
which I had not studied yet, had led me to expect a treatment full of
overpowering dramatic force. It is possible that Schroder-Devrient’s acting
in Fidelio had taught me to judge everything by her exalted standard.
With the greatest trouble I worked myself up to some kind of enthusiasm
for the great scene between Orestes and the Furies. I hoped against hope
that I should be able to admire the remainder of the opera. I began to
understand the Viennese taste, however, when I saw how great a favourite
the opera Zampa became with the public, both at the Karnthner Thor and at
the Josephstadt. Both theatres competed vigorously in the production of this
popular work, and although the public had seemed mad about Iphigenia,
nothing equalled their enthusiasm for Zampa. No sooner had they left the
Josephstadt Theatre in the greatest ecstasies about Zampa than they
proceeded to the public-house called the Strausslein. Here they were
immediately greeted by the strains of selections from Zampa which drove
the audience to feverish excitement. I shall never forget the extraordinary
playing of Johann Strauss, who put equal enthusiasm into everything he
played, and very often made the audience almost frantic with delight.
At the beginning of a new waltz this demon of the Viennese musical
spirit shook like a Pythian priestess on the tripod, and veritable groans of
ecstasy (which, without doubt, were more due to his music than to the
drinks in which the audience had indulged) raised their worship for the
magic violinist to almost bewildering heights of frenzy.
The hot summer air of Vienna was absolutely impregnated with Zampa
and Strauss. A very poor students’ rehearsal at the Conservatoire, at which
they performed a Mass by Cherubini, seemed to me like an alms paid
begrudgingly to the study of classical music. At the same rehearsal one of
the professors, to whom I was introduced, tried to make the students play
my Overture in D minor (the one already performed in Leipzig). I do not
know what his opinion was, nor that of the students, with regard to this
attempt; I only know they soon gave it up.
On the whole I had wandered into doubtful musical bypaths; and I now
withdrew from this first educational visit to a great European art centre in
order to start on a cheap, but long and monotonous return journey to
Bohemia, by stage-coach. My next move was a visit to the house of Count
Pachta, of whom I had pleasant recollections from my boyhood days. His
estate, Pravonin, was about eight miles from Prague. Received in the
overpowering dramatic force. It is possible that Schroder-Devrient’s acting
in Fidelio had taught me to judge everything by her exalted standard.
With the greatest trouble I worked myself up to some kind of enthusiasm
for the great scene between Orestes and the Furies. I hoped against hope
that I should be able to admire the remainder of the opera. I began to
understand the Viennese taste, however, when I saw how great a favourite
the opera Zampa became with the public, both at the Karnthner Thor and at
the Josephstadt. Both theatres competed vigorously in the production of this
popular work, and although the public had seemed mad about Iphigenia,
nothing equalled their enthusiasm for Zampa. No sooner had they left the
Josephstadt Theatre in the greatest ecstasies about Zampa than they
proceeded to the public-house called the Strausslein. Here they were
immediately greeted by the strains of selections from Zampa which drove
the audience to feverish excitement. I shall never forget the extraordinary
playing of Johann Strauss, who put equal enthusiasm into everything he
played, and very often made the audience almost frantic with delight.
At the beginning of a new waltz this demon of the Viennese musical
spirit shook like a Pythian priestess on the tripod, and veritable groans of
ecstasy (which, without doubt, were more due to his music than to the
drinks in which the audience had indulged) raised their worship for the
magic violinist to almost bewildering heights of frenzy.
The hot summer air of Vienna was absolutely impregnated with Zampa
and Strauss. A very poor students’ rehearsal at the Conservatoire, at which
they performed a Mass by Cherubini, seemed to me like an alms paid
begrudgingly to the study of classical music. At the same rehearsal one of
the professors, to whom I was introduced, tried to make the students play
my Overture in D minor (the one already performed in Leipzig). I do not
know what his opinion was, nor that of the students, with regard to this
attempt; I only know they soon gave it up.
On the whole I had wandered into doubtful musical bypaths; and I now
withdrew from this first educational visit to a great European art centre in
order to start on a cheap, but long and monotonous return journey to
Bohemia, by stage-coach. My next move was a visit to the house of Count
Pachta, of whom I had pleasant recollections from my boyhood days. His
estate, Pravonin, was about eight miles from Prague. Received in the
Page 79
kindest possible way by the old gentleman and his beautiful daughters, I
enjoyed his delightful hospitality until late into the autumn. A youth of
nineteen, as I then was, with a fast-growing beard (for which my sisters had
already prepared the young ladies by letter), the continual and close
intimacy with such kind and pretty girls could hardly fail to make a strong
impression on my imagination. Jenny, the elder of the two, was slim, with
black hair, blue eyes, and wonderfully noble features; the younger one,
Auguste, was a little smaller, and stouter, with a magnificent complexion,
fair hair, and brown eyes. The natural and sisterly manner with which both
girls treated me and conversed with me did not blind me to the fact that I
was expected to fall in love with one or the other of them. It amused them
to see how embarrassed I got in my efforts to choose between them, and
consequently they teased me tremendously.
Unfortunately, I did not act judiciously with regard to the daughters of
my host: in spite of their homely education, they belonged to a very
aristocratic house, and consequently hesitated between the hope of
marrying men of eminent position in their own sphere, and the necessity of
choosing husbands amongst the higher middle classes, who could afford to
keep them in comfort. The shockingly poor, almost mediaeval, education of
the Austrian so-called cavalier, made me rather despise the latter; the girls,
too, had suffered from the same lack of proper training. I soon noticed with
disgust how little they knew about things artistic, and how much value they
attached to superficial things. However much I might try to interest them in
those higher pursuits which had become necessary to me, they were
incapable of appreciating them. I advocated a complete change from the
bad library novels, which represented their only reading, from the Italian
operatic arias, sung by Auguste, and, last but not least, from the horsy,
insipid cavaliers, who paid their court to both Jenny and her sister in the
most coarse and offensive manner. My zeal in this latter respect soon gave
rise to great unpleasantness. I became hard and insulting, harangued them
about the French Revolution, and begged them with fatherly admonitions
‘for the love of heaven’ to be content with well-educated middle-class men,
and give up those impertinent suitors who could only harm their reputation.
The indignation provoked by my friendly advice I often had to ward off
with the harshest retorts. I never apologised, but tried by dint of real or
feigned jealousy to get our friendship back on the old footing. In this way,
undecided, half in love and half angry, one cold November day I said good-
enjoyed his delightful hospitality until late into the autumn. A youth of
nineteen, as I then was, with a fast-growing beard (for which my sisters had
already prepared the young ladies by letter), the continual and close
intimacy with such kind and pretty girls could hardly fail to make a strong
impression on my imagination. Jenny, the elder of the two, was slim, with
black hair, blue eyes, and wonderfully noble features; the younger one,
Auguste, was a little smaller, and stouter, with a magnificent complexion,
fair hair, and brown eyes. The natural and sisterly manner with which both
girls treated me and conversed with me did not blind me to the fact that I
was expected to fall in love with one or the other of them. It amused them
to see how embarrassed I got in my efforts to choose between them, and
consequently they teased me tremendously.
Unfortunately, I did not act judiciously with regard to the daughters of
my host: in spite of their homely education, they belonged to a very
aristocratic house, and consequently hesitated between the hope of
marrying men of eminent position in their own sphere, and the necessity of
choosing husbands amongst the higher middle classes, who could afford to
keep them in comfort. The shockingly poor, almost mediaeval, education of
the Austrian so-called cavalier, made me rather despise the latter; the girls,
too, had suffered from the same lack of proper training. I soon noticed with
disgust how little they knew about things artistic, and how much value they
attached to superficial things. However much I might try to interest them in
those higher pursuits which had become necessary to me, they were
incapable of appreciating them. I advocated a complete change from the
bad library novels, which represented their only reading, from the Italian
operatic arias, sung by Auguste, and, last but not least, from the horsy,
insipid cavaliers, who paid their court to both Jenny and her sister in the
most coarse and offensive manner. My zeal in this latter respect soon gave
rise to great unpleasantness. I became hard and insulting, harangued them
about the French Revolution, and begged them with fatherly admonitions
‘for the love of heaven’ to be content with well-educated middle-class men,
and give up those impertinent suitors who could only harm their reputation.
The indignation provoked by my friendly advice I often had to ward off
with the harshest retorts. I never apologised, but tried by dint of real or
feigned jealousy to get our friendship back on the old footing. In this way,
undecided, half in love and half angry, one cold November day I said good-
Page 80
bye to these pretty children. I soon met the whole family again at Prague,
where I made a long sojourn, without, however, staying at the Count’s
residence.
My stay at Prague was to be of great musical importance to me. I knew
the director of the Conservatoire, Dionys Weber, who promised to bring my
symphony before the public; I also spent much of my time with an actor
called Moritz, to whom, as an old friend of our family, I had been
recommended, and there I made the acquaintance of the young musician
Kittl.
Moritz, who noticed that not a day passed but what I went to the much-
feared chief of the Conservatoire upon some pressing musical business,
once despatched me with an improvised parody on Schiller’s Burgschaft:—
Zu Dionys dem Direktor schlich
Wagner, die Partitur im Gewande;
Ihn schlugen die Schuler im Bande:
‘Was wolltest du mit den Noten sprich?’
Entgegnet ihm finster der Wutherich:
‘Die Stadt vom schlechten Geschmacke befreien!
Das sollst du in den Rezensionen bereuen.’[5]
[5] To Dionys, the Director,
crept Wagner, the score in his pocket;
The students arrested him forthwith:
‘What do’st thou with that music, say?’
Thus asked him the angry tyrant:
‘To free the town from taste too vile!
For this the critics will make thee suffer.’
Truly I had to deal with a kind of ‘Dionysius the Tyrant.’ A man who did
not acknowledge Beethoven’s genius beyond his Second Symphony, a man
who looked upon the Eroica as the acme of bad taste on the master’s part;
who praised Mozart alone, and next to him tolerated only Lindpaintner:
such a man was not easy to approach, and I had to learn the art of making
use of tyrants for one’s own purposes. I dissimulated; I pretended to be
struck by the novelty of his ideas, never contradicted him, and, to point out
the similarity of our standpoints, I referred him to the end fugue in my
Overture and in my Symphony (both in C major), which I had only
succeeded in making what they were through having studied Mozart. My
reward soon followed: Dionys set to work to study my orchestral creations
with almost youthful energy.
where I made a long sojourn, without, however, staying at the Count’s
residence.
My stay at Prague was to be of great musical importance to me. I knew
the director of the Conservatoire, Dionys Weber, who promised to bring my
symphony before the public; I also spent much of my time with an actor
called Moritz, to whom, as an old friend of our family, I had been
recommended, and there I made the acquaintance of the young musician
Kittl.
Moritz, who noticed that not a day passed but what I went to the much-
feared chief of the Conservatoire upon some pressing musical business,
once despatched me with an improvised parody on Schiller’s Burgschaft:—
Zu Dionys dem Direktor schlich
Wagner, die Partitur im Gewande;
Ihn schlugen die Schuler im Bande:
‘Was wolltest du mit den Noten sprich?’
Entgegnet ihm finster der Wutherich:
‘Die Stadt vom schlechten Geschmacke befreien!
Das sollst du in den Rezensionen bereuen.’[5]
[5] To Dionys, the Director,
crept Wagner, the score in his pocket;
The students arrested him forthwith:
‘What do’st thou with that music, say?’
Thus asked him the angry tyrant:
‘To free the town from taste too vile!
For this the critics will make thee suffer.’
Truly I had to deal with a kind of ‘Dionysius the Tyrant.’ A man who did
not acknowledge Beethoven’s genius beyond his Second Symphony, a man
who looked upon the Eroica as the acme of bad taste on the master’s part;
who praised Mozart alone, and next to him tolerated only Lindpaintner:
such a man was not easy to approach, and I had to learn the art of making
use of tyrants for one’s own purposes. I dissimulated; I pretended to be
struck by the novelty of his ideas, never contradicted him, and, to point out
the similarity of our standpoints, I referred him to the end fugue in my
Overture and in my Symphony (both in C major), which I had only
succeeded in making what they were through having studied Mozart. My
reward soon followed: Dionys set to work to study my orchestral creations
with almost youthful energy.
Page 81
The students of the Conservatoire were compelled to practise with the
greatest exactitude my new symphony under his dry and terribly noisy
baton. In the presence of several of my friends, amongst whom was also the
dear old Count Pachta in his capacity of President of the Conservatoire
Committee, we actually held a first performance of the greatest work that I
had written up to that date.
During these musical successes I went on with my love-making in the
attractive house of Count Pachta, under the most curious circumstances. A
confectioner of the name of Hascha was my rival. He was a tall, lanky
young man who, like most Bohemians, had taken up music as a hobby; he
played the accompaniments to Auguste’s songs, and naturally fell in love
with her. Like myself, he hated the frequent visits of the cavaliers, which
seemed to be quite the custom in this city; but while my displeasure
expressed itself in humour, his showed itself in gloomy melancholy. This
mood made him behave boorishly in public: for instance, one evening,
when the chandelier was to be lighted for the reception of one of these
gentlemen, he ran his head purposely against this ornament and broke it.
The festive illumination was thus rendered impossible; the Countess was
furious, and Hascha had to leave the house never to return.
I well remember that the first time I was conscious of any feelings of
love, these manifested themselves as pangs of jealousy, which had,
however, nothing to do with real love: this happened one evening when I
called at the house. The Countess kept me by her side in an ante-room,
while the girls, beautifully dressed and gay, flirted in the reception-room
with those hateful young noblemen. All I had ever read in Hoffmann’s Tales
of certain demoniacal intrigues, which until that moment had been obscure
to me, now became really tangible facts, and I left Prague with an obviously
unjust and exaggerated opinion of those things and those people, through
whom I had suddenly been dragged into an unknown world of elementary
passions.
On the other hand I had gained by my stay at Pravonin: I had written
poetry as well as musical compositions. My musical work was a setting of
Glockentone, a poem by the friend of my youth, Theodor Apel. I had
already written an aria for soprano which had been performed the winter
before at one of the theatre concerts. But my new work was decidedly the
first vocal piece I had written with real inspiration; generally speaking, I
greatest exactitude my new symphony under his dry and terribly noisy
baton. In the presence of several of my friends, amongst whom was also the
dear old Count Pachta in his capacity of President of the Conservatoire
Committee, we actually held a first performance of the greatest work that I
had written up to that date.
During these musical successes I went on with my love-making in the
attractive house of Count Pachta, under the most curious circumstances. A
confectioner of the name of Hascha was my rival. He was a tall, lanky
young man who, like most Bohemians, had taken up music as a hobby; he
played the accompaniments to Auguste’s songs, and naturally fell in love
with her. Like myself, he hated the frequent visits of the cavaliers, which
seemed to be quite the custom in this city; but while my displeasure
expressed itself in humour, his showed itself in gloomy melancholy. This
mood made him behave boorishly in public: for instance, one evening,
when the chandelier was to be lighted for the reception of one of these
gentlemen, he ran his head purposely against this ornament and broke it.
The festive illumination was thus rendered impossible; the Countess was
furious, and Hascha had to leave the house never to return.
I well remember that the first time I was conscious of any feelings of
love, these manifested themselves as pangs of jealousy, which had,
however, nothing to do with real love: this happened one evening when I
called at the house. The Countess kept me by her side in an ante-room,
while the girls, beautifully dressed and gay, flirted in the reception-room
with those hateful young noblemen. All I had ever read in Hoffmann’s Tales
of certain demoniacal intrigues, which until that moment had been obscure
to me, now became really tangible facts, and I left Prague with an obviously
unjust and exaggerated opinion of those things and those people, through
whom I had suddenly been dragged into an unknown world of elementary
passions.
On the other hand I had gained by my stay at Pravonin: I had written
poetry as well as musical compositions. My musical work was a setting of
Glockentone, a poem by the friend of my youth, Theodor Apel. I had
already written an aria for soprano which had been performed the winter
before at one of the theatre concerts. But my new work was decidedly the
first vocal piece I had written with real inspiration; generally speaking, I
Page 82
suppose it owed its’ characteristics to the influence of Beethoven’s
Liederkreis: all the same, the impression that it has left on my mind is that it
was absolutely part of myself, and pervaded by a delicate sentimentality
which was brought into relief by the dreaminess of the accompaniment. My
poetical efforts lay in the direction of a sketch of a tragi-operatic subject,
which I finished in its entirety in Prague under the title of Die Hochzeit
(‘The Wedding’). I wrote it without anybody’s knowledge, and this was no
easy matter, seeing that I could not write in my chilly little hotel-room, and
had therefore to go to the house of Moritz, where I generally spent my
mornings. I remember how I used quickly to hide my manuscript behind the
sofa as soon as I heard my host’s footsteps.
An extraordinary episode was connected with the plot of this work.
Already years ago I had come across a tragic story, whilst perusing
Busching’s book on chivalry, the like of which I have never since read. A
lady of noble birth had been assaulted one night by a man who secretly
cherished a passionate love for her, and in the struggle to defend her honour
superhuman strength was given her to fling him into the courtyard below.
The mystery of his death remained unexplained until the day of his solemn
obsequies, when the lady herself, who attended them and was kneeling in
solemn prayer, suddenly fell forward and expired. The mysterious strength
of this profound and passionate story made an indelible impression upon
my mind. Fascinated, moreover, by the peculiar treatment of similar
phenomena in Hoffmann’s Tales, I sketched a novel in which musical
mysticism, which I still loved so deeply, played an important part. The
action was supposed to take place on the estate of a rich patron of the fine
arts: a young couple was going to be married, and had invited the friend of
the bride-groom, an interesting but melancholy and mysterious young man,
to their wedding. Intimately connected with the whole affair was a strange
old organist. The mystic relations which gradually developed between the
old musician, the melancholy young man and the bride, were to grow out of
the unravelment of certain intricate events, in a somewhat similar manner to
that of the mediaeval story above related. Here was the same idea: the
young man mysteriously killed, the equally strange sudden death of his
friend’s bride, and the old organist found dead on his bench after the
playing of an impressive requiem, the last chord of which was inordinately
prolonged as if it never would end.
Liederkreis: all the same, the impression that it has left on my mind is that it
was absolutely part of myself, and pervaded by a delicate sentimentality
which was brought into relief by the dreaminess of the accompaniment. My
poetical efforts lay in the direction of a sketch of a tragi-operatic subject,
which I finished in its entirety in Prague under the title of Die Hochzeit
(‘The Wedding’). I wrote it without anybody’s knowledge, and this was no
easy matter, seeing that I could not write in my chilly little hotel-room, and
had therefore to go to the house of Moritz, where I generally spent my
mornings. I remember how I used quickly to hide my manuscript behind the
sofa as soon as I heard my host’s footsteps.
An extraordinary episode was connected with the plot of this work.
Already years ago I had come across a tragic story, whilst perusing
Busching’s book on chivalry, the like of which I have never since read. A
lady of noble birth had been assaulted one night by a man who secretly
cherished a passionate love for her, and in the struggle to defend her honour
superhuman strength was given her to fling him into the courtyard below.
The mystery of his death remained unexplained until the day of his solemn
obsequies, when the lady herself, who attended them and was kneeling in
solemn prayer, suddenly fell forward and expired. The mysterious strength
of this profound and passionate story made an indelible impression upon
my mind. Fascinated, moreover, by the peculiar treatment of similar
phenomena in Hoffmann’s Tales, I sketched a novel in which musical
mysticism, which I still loved so deeply, played an important part. The
action was supposed to take place on the estate of a rich patron of the fine
arts: a young couple was going to be married, and had invited the friend of
the bride-groom, an interesting but melancholy and mysterious young man,
to their wedding. Intimately connected with the whole affair was a strange
old organist. The mystic relations which gradually developed between the
old musician, the melancholy young man and the bride, were to grow out of
the unravelment of certain intricate events, in a somewhat similar manner to
that of the mediaeval story above related. Here was the same idea: the
young man mysteriously killed, the equally strange sudden death of his
friend’s bride, and the old organist found dead on his bench after the
playing of an impressive requiem, the last chord of which was inordinately
prolonged as if it never would end.
Page 83
I never finished this novel: but as I wanted to write the libretto for an
opera, I took up the theme again in its original shape, and built on this (as
far as the principal features went) the following dramatic plot:—
Two great houses had lived in enmity, and had at last decided to end the
family feud. The aged head of one of these houses invited the son of his
former enemy to the wedding of his daughter with one of his faithful
partisans. The wedding feast is thus used as an opportunity for reconciling
the two families. Whilst the guests are full of the suspicion and fear of
treachery, their young leader falls violently in love with the bride of his
newly found ally. His tragic glance deeply affects her; the festive escort
accompanies her to the bridal chamber, where she is to await her beloved;
leaning against her tower-window she sees the same passionate eyes fixed
on her, and realises that she is face to face with a tragedy.
When he penetrates into her chamber, and embraces her with frantic
passion, she pushes him backwards towards the balcony, and throws him
over the parapet into the abyss, from whence his mutilated remains are
dragged by his companions. They at once arm themselves against the
presumed treachery, and call for vengeance; tumult and confusion fill the
courtyard: the interrupted wedding feast threatens to end in a night of
slaughter. The venerable head of the house at last succeeds in averting the
catastrophe. Messengers are sent to bear the tidings of the mysterious
calamity to the relatives of the victim: the corpse itself shall be the medium
of reconciliation, for, in the presence of the different generations of the
suspected family, Providence itself shall decide which of its members has
been guilty of treason. During the preparations for the obsequies the bride
shows signs of approaching madness; she flies from her bridegroom,
refuses to be united to him, and locks herself up in her tower-chamber. Only
when, at night, the gloomy though gorgeous ceremony commences, does
she appear at the head of her women to be present at the burial service, the
gruesome solemnity of which is interrupted by the news of the approach of
hostile forces and then by the armed attack of the kinsmen of the murdered
man. When the avengers of the presumed treachery penetrate into the
chapel and call upon the murderer to declare himself, the horrified lord of
the manor points towards his daughter who, turning away from her
bridegroom, falls lifeless by the coffin of her victim. This nocturnal drama,
through which ran reminiscences of Leubald und Adelaïde (the work of my
far-off boyhood), I wrote in the darkest vein, but in a more polished and
opera, I took up the theme again in its original shape, and built on this (as
far as the principal features went) the following dramatic plot:—
Two great houses had lived in enmity, and had at last decided to end the
family feud. The aged head of one of these houses invited the son of his
former enemy to the wedding of his daughter with one of his faithful
partisans. The wedding feast is thus used as an opportunity for reconciling
the two families. Whilst the guests are full of the suspicion and fear of
treachery, their young leader falls violently in love with the bride of his
newly found ally. His tragic glance deeply affects her; the festive escort
accompanies her to the bridal chamber, where she is to await her beloved;
leaning against her tower-window she sees the same passionate eyes fixed
on her, and realises that she is face to face with a tragedy.
When he penetrates into her chamber, and embraces her with frantic
passion, she pushes him backwards towards the balcony, and throws him
over the parapet into the abyss, from whence his mutilated remains are
dragged by his companions. They at once arm themselves against the
presumed treachery, and call for vengeance; tumult and confusion fill the
courtyard: the interrupted wedding feast threatens to end in a night of
slaughter. The venerable head of the house at last succeeds in averting the
catastrophe. Messengers are sent to bear the tidings of the mysterious
calamity to the relatives of the victim: the corpse itself shall be the medium
of reconciliation, for, in the presence of the different generations of the
suspected family, Providence itself shall decide which of its members has
been guilty of treason. During the preparations for the obsequies the bride
shows signs of approaching madness; she flies from her bridegroom,
refuses to be united to him, and locks herself up in her tower-chamber. Only
when, at night, the gloomy though gorgeous ceremony commences, does
she appear at the head of her women to be present at the burial service, the
gruesome solemnity of which is interrupted by the news of the approach of
hostile forces and then by the armed attack of the kinsmen of the murdered
man. When the avengers of the presumed treachery penetrate into the
chapel and call upon the murderer to declare himself, the horrified lord of
the manor points towards his daughter who, turning away from her
bridegroom, falls lifeless by the coffin of her victim. This nocturnal drama,
through which ran reminiscences of Leubald und Adelaïde (the work of my
far-off boyhood), I wrote in the darkest vein, but in a more polished and
Page 84
more noble style, disdaining all light-effects, and especially all operatic
embellishments. Tender passages occurred here and there all the same, and
Weinlich, to whom I had already shown the beginning of my work on my
return to Leipzig, praised me for the clearness and good vocal quality of the
introduction I had composed to the first act; this was an Adagio for a vocal
septette, in which I had tried to express the reconciliation of the hostile
families, together with the emotions of the wedded couple and the sinister
passion of the secret lover. My principal object was, all the same, to win my
sister Rosalie’s approval. My poem, however, did not find favour in her
eyes: she missed all that which I had purposely avoided, insisted on the
ornamentation and development of the simple situation, and desired more
brightness generally. I made up my mind in an instant: I took the
manuscript, and without a suggestion of ill-temper, destroyed it there and
then. This action had nothing whatever to do with wounded vanity. It was
prompted merely by my desire honestly to prove to my sister how little I
thought of my own work and how much I cared for her opinion. She was
held in great and loving esteem by my mother and by the rest of our family,
for she was their principal breadwinner: the important salary she earned as
an actress constituted nearly the whole income out of which my mother had
to defray the household expenses. For the sake of her profession she
enjoyed many advantages at home. Her part of the house had been specially
arranged so that she should have all the necessary comfort and peace for her
studies; on marketing days, when the others had to put up with the simplest
fare, she had to have the same dainty food as usual. But more than any of
these things did her charming gravity and her refined way of speaking place
her above the younger children. She was thoughtful and gentle and never
joined us in our rather loud conversation. Of course, I had been the one
member of the family who had caused the greatest anxieties both to my
mother and to my motherly sister, and during my life as a student the
strained relations between us had made a terrible impression on me. When
therefore they tried to believe in me again, and once more showed some
interest in my work, I was full of gratitude and happiness. The thought of
getting this sister to look kindly upon my aspirations, and even to expect
great things of me, had become a special stimulus to my ambition. Under
these circumstances a tender and almost sentimental relationship grew up
between Rosalie and myself, which in its purity and sincerity could vie with
the noblest form of friendship between man and woman. This was
embellishments. Tender passages occurred here and there all the same, and
Weinlich, to whom I had already shown the beginning of my work on my
return to Leipzig, praised me for the clearness and good vocal quality of the
introduction I had composed to the first act; this was an Adagio for a vocal
septette, in which I had tried to express the reconciliation of the hostile
families, together with the emotions of the wedded couple and the sinister
passion of the secret lover. My principal object was, all the same, to win my
sister Rosalie’s approval. My poem, however, did not find favour in her
eyes: she missed all that which I had purposely avoided, insisted on the
ornamentation and development of the simple situation, and desired more
brightness generally. I made up my mind in an instant: I took the
manuscript, and without a suggestion of ill-temper, destroyed it there and
then. This action had nothing whatever to do with wounded vanity. It was
prompted merely by my desire honestly to prove to my sister how little I
thought of my own work and how much I cared for her opinion. She was
held in great and loving esteem by my mother and by the rest of our family,
for she was their principal breadwinner: the important salary she earned as
an actress constituted nearly the whole income out of which my mother had
to defray the household expenses. For the sake of her profession she
enjoyed many advantages at home. Her part of the house had been specially
arranged so that she should have all the necessary comfort and peace for her
studies; on marketing days, when the others had to put up with the simplest
fare, she had to have the same dainty food as usual. But more than any of
these things did her charming gravity and her refined way of speaking place
her above the younger children. She was thoughtful and gentle and never
joined us in our rather loud conversation. Of course, I had been the one
member of the family who had caused the greatest anxieties both to my
mother and to my motherly sister, and during my life as a student the
strained relations between us had made a terrible impression on me. When
therefore they tried to believe in me again, and once more showed some
interest in my work, I was full of gratitude and happiness. The thought of
getting this sister to look kindly upon my aspirations, and even to expect
great things of me, had become a special stimulus to my ambition. Under
these circumstances a tender and almost sentimental relationship grew up
between Rosalie and myself, which in its purity and sincerity could vie with
the noblest form of friendship between man and woman. This was
Page 85
principally due to her exceptional individuality. She had not any real talent,
at least not for acting, which had often been considered stagey and
unnatural. Nevertheless she was much appreciated owing to her charming
appearance as well as to her pure and dignified womanliness, and I
remember many tokens of esteem which she received in those days. All the
same, none of these advances ever seemed to lead to the prospect of a
marriage, and year by year went by without bringing her hopes of a suitable
match—a fact which to me appeared quite unaccountable. From time to
time I thought I noticed that Rosalie suffered from this state of affairs. I
remember one evening when, believing herself to be alone, I heard her
sobbing and moaning; I stole away unnoticed, but her grief made such an
impression upon me that from that moment I vowed to bring some joy into
her life, principally by making a name for myself. Not without reason had
our stepfather Geyer given my gentle sister the nickname of ‘Geistchen’
(little spirit), for if her talent as an actress was not great, her imagination
and her love of art and of all high and noble things were perhaps, on that
account alone, all the greater. From her lips I had first heard expressions of
admiration and delight concerning those subjects which became dear to me
later on, and she moved amongst a circle of serious and interesting people
who loved the higher things of life without this attitude ever degenerating
into affectation.
On my return from my long journey I was introduced to Heinrich Laube,
whom my sister had added to her list of intimate friends. It was at the time
when the after-effects of the July revolution were beginning to make
themselves felt amongst the younger men of intellect in Germany, and of
these Laube was one of the most conspicuous. As a young man he came
from Silesia to Leipzig, his principal object being to try and form
connections in this publishing centre which might be of use to him in Paris,
whither he was going, and from which place Borne also made a sensation
amongst us by his letters. On this occasion Laube was present at a
representation of a play by Ludwig Robert, Die Macht der Verhallnisse
(‘The Power of Circumstances’). This induced him to write a criticism for
the Leipzig Tageblatt, which made such a sensation through its terse and
lively style that he was at once offered, in addition to other literary work,
the post of editor of Die elegante Welt. In our house he was looked upon as
a genius; his curt and often biting manner of speaking, which seemed to
exclude all attempt at poetic expression, made him appear both original and
at least not for acting, which had often been considered stagey and
unnatural. Nevertheless she was much appreciated owing to her charming
appearance as well as to her pure and dignified womanliness, and I
remember many tokens of esteem which she received in those days. All the
same, none of these advances ever seemed to lead to the prospect of a
marriage, and year by year went by without bringing her hopes of a suitable
match—a fact which to me appeared quite unaccountable. From time to
time I thought I noticed that Rosalie suffered from this state of affairs. I
remember one evening when, believing herself to be alone, I heard her
sobbing and moaning; I stole away unnoticed, but her grief made such an
impression upon me that from that moment I vowed to bring some joy into
her life, principally by making a name for myself. Not without reason had
our stepfather Geyer given my gentle sister the nickname of ‘Geistchen’
(little spirit), for if her talent as an actress was not great, her imagination
and her love of art and of all high and noble things were perhaps, on that
account alone, all the greater. From her lips I had first heard expressions of
admiration and delight concerning those subjects which became dear to me
later on, and she moved amongst a circle of serious and interesting people
who loved the higher things of life without this attitude ever degenerating
into affectation.
On my return from my long journey I was introduced to Heinrich Laube,
whom my sister had added to her list of intimate friends. It was at the time
when the after-effects of the July revolution were beginning to make
themselves felt amongst the younger men of intellect in Germany, and of
these Laube was one of the most conspicuous. As a young man he came
from Silesia to Leipzig, his principal object being to try and form
connections in this publishing centre which might be of use to him in Paris,
whither he was going, and from which place Borne also made a sensation
amongst us by his letters. On this occasion Laube was present at a
representation of a play by Ludwig Robert, Die Macht der Verhallnisse
(‘The Power of Circumstances’). This induced him to write a criticism for
the Leipzig Tageblatt, which made such a sensation through its terse and
lively style that he was at once offered, in addition to other literary work,
the post of editor of Die elegante Welt. In our house he was looked upon as
a genius; his curt and often biting manner of speaking, which seemed to
exclude all attempt at poetic expression, made him appear both original and
Page 86
daring: his sense of justice, his sincerity and fearless bluntness made one
respect his character, hardened as it had been in youth by great adversity.
On me he had a very inspiring effect, and I was very much astonished to
find that he thought so much of me as to write a flattering notice about my
talent in his paper after hearing the first performance of my symphony.
This performance took place in the beginning of the year 1833 at the
Leipzig Schneider-Herberge. It was, by the bye, in this dignified old hall
that the society ‘Euterpe’ held its concerts! The place was dirty, narrow, and
poorly lighted, and it was here that my work was introduced to the Leipzig
public for the first time, and by means of an orchestra that interpreted it
simply disgracefully. I can only think of that evening as a gruesome
nightmare; and my astonishment was therefore all the greater at seeing the
important notice which Laube wrote about the performance. Full of hope, I
therefore looked forward to a performance of the same work at the
Gewandhaus concert, which followed soon after, and which came off
brilliantly in every way. It was well received and well spoken of in all the
papers; of real malice there was not a trace—on the contrary, several notices
wore encouraging, and Laube, who had quickly become celebrated,
confided to me that he was going to offer me a libretto for an opera, which
he had first written for Meyerbeer. This staggered me somewhat, for I was
not in the least prepared to pose as a poet, and my only idea was to write a
real plot for an opera. As to the precise manner, however, in which such a
book had to be written, I already had a very definite and instinctive notion,
and I was strengthened in the certainty of my own feelings in the matter
when Laube now explained the nature of his plot to me. He told me that he
wanted to arrange nothing less than Kosziusko into a libretto for grand
opera! Once again I had qualms, for I felt at once that Laube had a mistaken
idea about the character of a dramatic subject. When I inquired into the real
action of the play, Laube was astonished that I should expect more than the
story of the Polish hero, whose life was crowded with incident; in any case,
he thought there was quite sufficient action in it to describe the unhappy
fate of a whole nation. Of course the usual heroine was not missing; she
was a Polish girl who had a love affair with a Russian; and in this way some
sentimental situations were also to be found in the plot. Without a moment’s
delay I assured my sister Rosalie that I would not set this story to music:
she agreed with me, and begged me only to postpone my answer to Laube.
My journey to Wurzburg was of great help to me in this respect, for it was
respect his character, hardened as it had been in youth by great adversity.
On me he had a very inspiring effect, and I was very much astonished to
find that he thought so much of me as to write a flattering notice about my
talent in his paper after hearing the first performance of my symphony.
This performance took place in the beginning of the year 1833 at the
Leipzig Schneider-Herberge. It was, by the bye, in this dignified old hall
that the society ‘Euterpe’ held its concerts! The place was dirty, narrow, and
poorly lighted, and it was here that my work was introduced to the Leipzig
public for the first time, and by means of an orchestra that interpreted it
simply disgracefully. I can only think of that evening as a gruesome
nightmare; and my astonishment was therefore all the greater at seeing the
important notice which Laube wrote about the performance. Full of hope, I
therefore looked forward to a performance of the same work at the
Gewandhaus concert, which followed soon after, and which came off
brilliantly in every way. It was well received and well spoken of in all the
papers; of real malice there was not a trace—on the contrary, several notices
wore encouraging, and Laube, who had quickly become celebrated,
confided to me that he was going to offer me a libretto for an opera, which
he had first written for Meyerbeer. This staggered me somewhat, for I was
not in the least prepared to pose as a poet, and my only idea was to write a
real plot for an opera. As to the precise manner, however, in which such a
book had to be written, I already had a very definite and instinctive notion,
and I was strengthened in the certainty of my own feelings in the matter
when Laube now explained the nature of his plot to me. He told me that he
wanted to arrange nothing less than Kosziusko into a libretto for grand
opera! Once again I had qualms, for I felt at once that Laube had a mistaken
idea about the character of a dramatic subject. When I inquired into the real
action of the play, Laube was astonished that I should expect more than the
story of the Polish hero, whose life was crowded with incident; in any case,
he thought there was quite sufficient action in it to describe the unhappy
fate of a whole nation. Of course the usual heroine was not missing; she
was a Polish girl who had a love affair with a Russian; and in this way some
sentimental situations were also to be found in the plot. Without a moment’s
delay I assured my sister Rosalie that I would not set this story to music:
she agreed with me, and begged me only to postpone my answer to Laube.
My journey to Wurzburg was of great help to me in this respect, for it was
Page 87
easier to write my decision to Laube than to announce it to him personally.
He accepted the slight rebuff with good grace, but he never forgave me,
either then or afterwards, for writing my own words!
When he heard what subject I had preferred to his brilliant political
poem, he made no effort to conceal his contempt for my choice. I had
borrowed the plot from a dramatic fairy tale by Gozzi, La Donna Serpente,
and called it Die Feen (‘The Fairies’). The names of my heroes I chose from
different Ossian and similar poems: my prince was called Arindal; he was
loved by a fairy called Ada, who held him under her spell and kept him in
fairyland, away from his realm, until his faithful friends at last found him
and induced him to return, for his country was going to rack and ruin, and
even its capital had fallen into the enemy’s hands. The loving fairy herself
sends the prince back to his country; for the oracle has decreed that she
shall lay upon her lover the severest of tasks. Only by performing this task
triumphantly can he make it possible for her to leave the immortal world of
fairies in order to share the fate of her earthly lover, as his wife. In a
moment of deepest despair about the state of his country, the fairy queen
appears to him and purposely destroys his faith in her by deeds of the most
cruel and inexplicable nature. Driven mad by a thousand fears, Arindal
begins to imagine that all the time he has been dealing with a wicked
sorceress, and tries to escape the fatal spell by pronouncing a curse upon
Ada. Wild with sorrow, the unhappy fairy sinks down, and reveals their
mutual fate to the lover, now lost to her for ever, and tells him that, as a
punishment for having disobeyed the decree of Fate, she is doomed to be
turned into stone (in Gozzi’s version she becomes a serpent). Immediately
afterwards it appears that all the catastrophes which the fairy had
prophesied were but deceptions: victory over the enemy as well as the
growing prosperity and welfare of the kingdom now follow in quick
succession: Ada is taken away by the Fates, and Arindal, a raving madman,
remains behind alone. The terrible sufferings of his madness do not,
however, satisfy the Fates: to bring about his utter ruin they appear before
the repentant man and invite him to follow them to the nether world, on the
pretext of enabling him to free Ada from the spell. Through the treacherous
promises of the wicked fairies Arindal’s madness grows into sublime
exaltation; and one of his household magicians, a faithful friend, having in
the meantime equipped him with magic weapons and charms, he now
follows the traitresses. The latter cannot get over their astonishment when
He accepted the slight rebuff with good grace, but he never forgave me,
either then or afterwards, for writing my own words!
When he heard what subject I had preferred to his brilliant political
poem, he made no effort to conceal his contempt for my choice. I had
borrowed the plot from a dramatic fairy tale by Gozzi, La Donna Serpente,
and called it Die Feen (‘The Fairies’). The names of my heroes I chose from
different Ossian and similar poems: my prince was called Arindal; he was
loved by a fairy called Ada, who held him under her spell and kept him in
fairyland, away from his realm, until his faithful friends at last found him
and induced him to return, for his country was going to rack and ruin, and
even its capital had fallen into the enemy’s hands. The loving fairy herself
sends the prince back to his country; for the oracle has decreed that she
shall lay upon her lover the severest of tasks. Only by performing this task
triumphantly can he make it possible for her to leave the immortal world of
fairies in order to share the fate of her earthly lover, as his wife. In a
moment of deepest despair about the state of his country, the fairy queen
appears to him and purposely destroys his faith in her by deeds of the most
cruel and inexplicable nature. Driven mad by a thousand fears, Arindal
begins to imagine that all the time he has been dealing with a wicked
sorceress, and tries to escape the fatal spell by pronouncing a curse upon
Ada. Wild with sorrow, the unhappy fairy sinks down, and reveals their
mutual fate to the lover, now lost to her for ever, and tells him that, as a
punishment for having disobeyed the decree of Fate, she is doomed to be
turned into stone (in Gozzi’s version she becomes a serpent). Immediately
afterwards it appears that all the catastrophes which the fairy had
prophesied were but deceptions: victory over the enemy as well as the
growing prosperity and welfare of the kingdom now follow in quick
succession: Ada is taken away by the Fates, and Arindal, a raving madman,
remains behind alone. The terrible sufferings of his madness do not,
however, satisfy the Fates: to bring about his utter ruin they appear before
the repentant man and invite him to follow them to the nether world, on the
pretext of enabling him to free Ada from the spell. Through the treacherous
promises of the wicked fairies Arindal’s madness grows into sublime
exaltation; and one of his household magicians, a faithful friend, having in
the meantime equipped him with magic weapons and charms, he now
follows the traitresses. The latter cannot get over their astonishment when
Page 88
they see how Arindal overcomes one after the other of the monsters of the
infernal regions: only when they arrive at the vault in which they show him
the stone in human shape do they recover their hope of vanquishing the
valiant prince, for, unless he can break the charm which binds Ada, he must
share her fate and be doomed to remain a stone for ever. Arindal, who until
then has been using the dagger and the shield given him by the friendly
magician, now makes use of an instrument—a lyre—which he has brought
with him, and the meaning of which he had not yet understood. To the
sounds of this instrument he now expresses his plaintive moans, his
remorse, and his overpowering longing for his enchanted queen. The stone
is moved by the magic of his love: the beloved one is released. Fairyland
with all its marvels opens its portals, and the mortal learns that, owing to his
former inconstancy, Ada has lost the right to become his wife on earth, but
that her beloved, through his great and magic power, has earned the right to
live for ever by her side in fairyland.
Although I had written Die Hochzeit in the darkest vein, without operatic
embellishments, I painted this subject with the utmost colour and variety. In
contrast to the lovers out of fairyland I depicted a more ordinary couple,
and I even introduced a third pair that belonged to the coarser and more
comical servant world. I purposely went to no pains in the matter of the
poetic diction and the verse. My idea was not to encourage my former
hopes of making a name as a poet; I was now really a ‘musician’ and a
‘composer,’ and wished to write a decent opera libretto simply because I
was sure that nobody else could write one for me; the reason being that
such a book is something quite unique and cannot be written either by a
poet or by a mere man of letters. With the intention of setting this libretto to
music, I left Leipzig in January, 1833, to stay in Wurzburg with my eldest
brother Albert, who at the time held an appointment at the theatre. It now
seemed necessary for me to begin to apply my musical knowledge to a
practical purpose, and to this end my brother had promised to help me in
getting some kind of post at the small Wurzburg theatre. I travelled by post
to Bamberg via Hof, and in Bamberg I stayed a few days in the company of
a young man called Schunke, who from a player on the horn had become an
actor. With the greatest interest I learned the story of Caspar Hauser, who at
that time was very well known, and who (if I am not mistaken) was pointed
out to me. In addition to this, I admired the peculiar costumes of the
market-women, thought with much interest of Hoffmann’s stay at this place,
infernal regions: only when they arrive at the vault in which they show him
the stone in human shape do they recover their hope of vanquishing the
valiant prince, for, unless he can break the charm which binds Ada, he must
share her fate and be doomed to remain a stone for ever. Arindal, who until
then has been using the dagger and the shield given him by the friendly
magician, now makes use of an instrument—a lyre—which he has brought
with him, and the meaning of which he had not yet understood. To the
sounds of this instrument he now expresses his plaintive moans, his
remorse, and his overpowering longing for his enchanted queen. The stone
is moved by the magic of his love: the beloved one is released. Fairyland
with all its marvels opens its portals, and the mortal learns that, owing to his
former inconstancy, Ada has lost the right to become his wife on earth, but
that her beloved, through his great and magic power, has earned the right to
live for ever by her side in fairyland.
Although I had written Die Hochzeit in the darkest vein, without operatic
embellishments, I painted this subject with the utmost colour and variety. In
contrast to the lovers out of fairyland I depicted a more ordinary couple,
and I even introduced a third pair that belonged to the coarser and more
comical servant world. I purposely went to no pains in the matter of the
poetic diction and the verse. My idea was not to encourage my former
hopes of making a name as a poet; I was now really a ‘musician’ and a
‘composer,’ and wished to write a decent opera libretto simply because I
was sure that nobody else could write one for me; the reason being that
such a book is something quite unique and cannot be written either by a
poet or by a mere man of letters. With the intention of setting this libretto to
music, I left Leipzig in January, 1833, to stay in Wurzburg with my eldest
brother Albert, who at the time held an appointment at the theatre. It now
seemed necessary for me to begin to apply my musical knowledge to a
practical purpose, and to this end my brother had promised to help me in
getting some kind of post at the small Wurzburg theatre. I travelled by post
to Bamberg via Hof, and in Bamberg I stayed a few days in the company of
a young man called Schunke, who from a player on the horn had become an
actor. With the greatest interest I learned the story of Caspar Hauser, who at
that time was very well known, and who (if I am not mistaken) was pointed
out to me. In addition to this, I admired the peculiar costumes of the
market-women, thought with much interest of Hoffmann’s stay at this place,
Page 89
and of how it had led to the writing of his Tales, and resumed my journey
(to Wurzburg) with a man called Hauderer, and suffered miserably from the
cold all the way.
My brother Albert, who was almost a new acquaintance to me, did his
best to make me feel at home in his not over luxurious establishment. He
was pleased to find me less mad than he had expected me to be from a
certain letter with which I had succeeded in frightening him some time
previously, and he really managed to procure me an exceptional occupation
as choir-master at the theatre, for which I received the monthly fee of ten
guilders. The remainder of the winter was devoted to the serious study of
the duties required of a musical director: in a very short time I had to tackle
two new grand operas, namely, Marschner’s Vampir and Meyerbeer’s
Robert der Teufel, in both of which the chorus played a considerable part.
At first I felt absolutely like a beginner, and had to start on Camilla von
Paer, the score of which was utterly unknown to me. I still remember that I
felt I was doing a thing which I had no right to undertake: I felt quite an
amateur at the work. Soon, however, Marschner’s score interested me
sufficiently to make the labour seem worth my while. The score of Robert
was a great disappointment to me: from the newspapers I had expected
plenty of originality and novelty; I could find no trace of either in this
transparent work, and an opera with a finale like that of the second act
could not be named in the same breath with any of my favourite works. The
only thing that impressed me was the unearthly keyed trumpet which, in the
last act, represented the voice of the mother’s ghost.
It was remarkable to observe the aesthetic demoralisation into which I
now fell through having daily to deal with such a work. I gradually lost my
dislike for this shallow and exceedingly uninteresting composition (a dislike
I shared with many German musicians) in the growing interest which I was
compelled to take in its interpretation; and thus it happened that the
insipidness and affectation of the commonplace melodies ceased to concern
me save from the standpoint of their capability of eliciting applause or the
reverse. As, moreover, my future career as musical conductor was at stake,
my brother, who was very anxious on my behalf, looked favourably on this
lack of classical obstinacy on my part, and thus the ground was gradually
prepared for that decline in my classical taste which was destined to last
some considerable time.
(to Wurzburg) with a man called Hauderer, and suffered miserably from the
cold all the way.
My brother Albert, who was almost a new acquaintance to me, did his
best to make me feel at home in his not over luxurious establishment. He
was pleased to find me less mad than he had expected me to be from a
certain letter with which I had succeeded in frightening him some time
previously, and he really managed to procure me an exceptional occupation
as choir-master at the theatre, for which I received the monthly fee of ten
guilders. The remainder of the winter was devoted to the serious study of
the duties required of a musical director: in a very short time I had to tackle
two new grand operas, namely, Marschner’s Vampir and Meyerbeer’s
Robert der Teufel, in both of which the chorus played a considerable part.
At first I felt absolutely like a beginner, and had to start on Camilla von
Paer, the score of which was utterly unknown to me. I still remember that I
felt I was doing a thing which I had no right to undertake: I felt quite an
amateur at the work. Soon, however, Marschner’s score interested me
sufficiently to make the labour seem worth my while. The score of Robert
was a great disappointment to me: from the newspapers I had expected
plenty of originality and novelty; I could find no trace of either in this
transparent work, and an opera with a finale like that of the second act
could not be named in the same breath with any of my favourite works. The
only thing that impressed me was the unearthly keyed trumpet which, in the
last act, represented the voice of the mother’s ghost.
It was remarkable to observe the aesthetic demoralisation into which I
now fell through having daily to deal with such a work. I gradually lost my
dislike for this shallow and exceedingly uninteresting composition (a dislike
I shared with many German musicians) in the growing interest which I was
compelled to take in its interpretation; and thus it happened that the
insipidness and affectation of the commonplace melodies ceased to concern
me save from the standpoint of their capability of eliciting applause or the
reverse. As, moreover, my future career as musical conductor was at stake,
my brother, who was very anxious on my behalf, looked favourably on this
lack of classical obstinacy on my part, and thus the ground was gradually
prepared for that decline in my classical taste which was destined to last
some considerable time.
Page 90
All the same, this did not occur before I had given some proof of my
great inexperience in the lighter style of writing. My brother wanted to
introduce a ‘Cavatine’ from the Piraten, by Bellini, into the same
composer’s opera, Straniera; the score was not to be had, and he entrusted
me with the instrumentation of this work. From the piano score alone I
could not possibly detect the heavy and noisy instrumentation of the
ritornelles and intermezzi which, musically, were so very thin; the
composer of a great C major Symphony with an end fugue could only help
himself out of the difficulty by the use of a few flutes and clarinets playing
in thirds. At the rehearsal the ‘Cavatine’ sounded so frightfully thin and
shallow that my brother made me serious reproaches about the waste of
copying expenses. But I had my revenge: to the tenor aria of ‘Aubry’ in
Marschner’s Vampir I added an Allegro, for which I also wrote the words.
My work succeeded splendidly, and earned the praise of both the public
and my brother. In a similar German style I wrote the music to my Feen in
the course of the year 1833. My brother and his wife left Wurzburg after
Easter in order to avail themselves of several invitations at friends’ houses; I
stayed behind with the children—three little girls of tender years—which
placed me in the extraordinary position of a responsible guardian, a post for
which I was not in the least suited at that time of my life. My time was
divided between my work and pleasure, and in consequence I neglected my
charges. Amongst the friends I made there, Alexander Muller had much
influence over me; he was a good musician and pianist, and I used to listen
for hours to his improvisations on given themes—an accomplishment in
which he so greatly excelled, that I could not fail to be impressed. With him
and some other friends, amongst whom was also Valentin Hamm, I often
made excursions in the neighbourhood, on which occasions the Bavarian
beer and the Frankish wine were wont to fly. Valentin Hamm was a
grotesque individual, who entertained us often with his excellent violin
playing; he had an enormous stretch on the piano, for he could reach an
interval of a twelfth. Der Letzte Hieb, a public beer-garden situated on a
pleasant height, was a daily witness of my fits of wild and often enthusiastic
boisterousness; never once during those mild summer nights did I return to
my charges without having waxed enthusiastic over art and the world in
general. I also remember a wicked trick which has always remained a blot
in my memory. Amongst my friends was a fair and very enthusiastic
Swabian called Frohlich, with whom I had exchanged my score of the C
great inexperience in the lighter style of writing. My brother wanted to
introduce a ‘Cavatine’ from the Piraten, by Bellini, into the same
composer’s opera, Straniera; the score was not to be had, and he entrusted
me with the instrumentation of this work. From the piano score alone I
could not possibly detect the heavy and noisy instrumentation of the
ritornelles and intermezzi which, musically, were so very thin; the
composer of a great C major Symphony with an end fugue could only help
himself out of the difficulty by the use of a few flutes and clarinets playing
in thirds. At the rehearsal the ‘Cavatine’ sounded so frightfully thin and
shallow that my brother made me serious reproaches about the waste of
copying expenses. But I had my revenge: to the tenor aria of ‘Aubry’ in
Marschner’s Vampir I added an Allegro, for which I also wrote the words.
My work succeeded splendidly, and earned the praise of both the public
and my brother. In a similar German style I wrote the music to my Feen in
the course of the year 1833. My brother and his wife left Wurzburg after
Easter in order to avail themselves of several invitations at friends’ houses; I
stayed behind with the children—three little girls of tender years—which
placed me in the extraordinary position of a responsible guardian, a post for
which I was not in the least suited at that time of my life. My time was
divided between my work and pleasure, and in consequence I neglected my
charges. Amongst the friends I made there, Alexander Muller had much
influence over me; he was a good musician and pianist, and I used to listen
for hours to his improvisations on given themes—an accomplishment in
which he so greatly excelled, that I could not fail to be impressed. With him
and some other friends, amongst whom was also Valentin Hamm, I often
made excursions in the neighbourhood, on which occasions the Bavarian
beer and the Frankish wine were wont to fly. Valentin Hamm was a
grotesque individual, who entertained us often with his excellent violin
playing; he had an enormous stretch on the piano, for he could reach an
interval of a twelfth. Der Letzte Hieb, a public beer-garden situated on a
pleasant height, was a daily witness of my fits of wild and often enthusiastic
boisterousness; never once during those mild summer nights did I return to
my charges without having waxed enthusiastic over art and the world in
general. I also remember a wicked trick which has always remained a blot
in my memory. Amongst my friends was a fair and very enthusiastic
Swabian called Frohlich, with whom I had exchanged my score of the C
Page 91
minor Symphony for his, which he had copied out with his own hand. This
very gentle, but rather irritable young man had taken such a violent dislike
to one Andre, whose malicious face I also detested, that he declared that this
person spoilt his evenings for him, merely by being in the same room with
him. The unfortunate object of his hatred tried all the same to meet us
whenever he could: friction ensued, but Andre would insist upon
aggravating us. One evening Frohlich lost patience. After some insulting
retort, he tried to chase him from our table by striking him with a stick: the
result was a fight in which Frolich’s friends felt they must take part, though
they all seemed to do so with some reluctance. A mad longing to join the
fray also took possession of me. With the others I helped in knocking our
poor victim about, and I even heard the sound of one terrible blow which I
struck Andre on the head, whilst he fixed his eyes on me in bewilderment.
I relate this incident to atone for a sin which has weighed very heavily on
my conscience ever since. I can compare this sad experience only with one
out of my earliest boyhood days, namely the drowning of some puppies in a
shallow pool behind my uncle’s house in Eisleben. Even to this day I cannot
think of the slow death of these poor little creatures without horror. I have
never quite forgotten some of my thoughtless and reckless actions; for the
sorrows of others, and in particular those of animals, have always affected
me deeply to the extent of filling me with a disgust of life.
My first love affair stands out in strong contrast against these
recollections. It was only natural that one of the young chorus ladies with
whom I had to practise daily should know how to attract my attentions.
Therese Ringelmann, the daughter of a grave-digger, thanks to her beautiful
soprano voice, led me to believe that I could make a great singer of her.
After I told her of this ambitious scheme, she paid much attention to her
appearance, and dressed elegantly for the rehearsals, and a row of white
pearls which she wound through her hair specially fascinated me. During
the summer holidays I gave Therese regular lessons in singing, according to
a method which has always remained a mystery to me ever since. I also
called on her very often at her house, where, fortunately, I never met her
unpleasant father, but always her mother and her sisters. We also met in the
public gardens, but false vanity always kept me from telling my friends of
our relations. I do not know whether the fault lay with her lowly birth, her
lack of education, or my own doubt about the sincerity of my affections; but
in any case when, in addition to the fact that I had my reasons for being
very gentle, but rather irritable young man had taken such a violent dislike
to one Andre, whose malicious face I also detested, that he declared that this
person spoilt his evenings for him, merely by being in the same room with
him. The unfortunate object of his hatred tried all the same to meet us
whenever he could: friction ensued, but Andre would insist upon
aggravating us. One evening Frohlich lost patience. After some insulting
retort, he tried to chase him from our table by striking him with a stick: the
result was a fight in which Frolich’s friends felt they must take part, though
they all seemed to do so with some reluctance. A mad longing to join the
fray also took possession of me. With the others I helped in knocking our
poor victim about, and I even heard the sound of one terrible blow which I
struck Andre on the head, whilst he fixed his eyes on me in bewilderment.
I relate this incident to atone for a sin which has weighed very heavily on
my conscience ever since. I can compare this sad experience only with one
out of my earliest boyhood days, namely the drowning of some puppies in a
shallow pool behind my uncle’s house in Eisleben. Even to this day I cannot
think of the slow death of these poor little creatures without horror. I have
never quite forgotten some of my thoughtless and reckless actions; for the
sorrows of others, and in particular those of animals, have always affected
me deeply to the extent of filling me with a disgust of life.
My first love affair stands out in strong contrast against these
recollections. It was only natural that one of the young chorus ladies with
whom I had to practise daily should know how to attract my attentions.
Therese Ringelmann, the daughter of a grave-digger, thanks to her beautiful
soprano voice, led me to believe that I could make a great singer of her.
After I told her of this ambitious scheme, she paid much attention to her
appearance, and dressed elegantly for the rehearsals, and a row of white
pearls which she wound through her hair specially fascinated me. During
the summer holidays I gave Therese regular lessons in singing, according to
a method which has always remained a mystery to me ever since. I also
called on her very often at her house, where, fortunately, I never met her
unpleasant father, but always her mother and her sisters. We also met in the
public gardens, but false vanity always kept me from telling my friends of
our relations. I do not know whether the fault lay with her lowly birth, her
lack of education, or my own doubt about the sincerity of my affections; but
in any case when, in addition to the fact that I had my reasons for being
Page 92
jealous, they also tried to urge me to a formal engagement, this love affair
came quietly to an end.
An infinitely more genuine affair was my love for Friederike Galvani, the
daughter of a mechanic, who was undoubtedly of Italian origin. She was
very musical, and had a lovely voice; my brother had patronised her and
helped her to a debut at his theatre, which test she stood brilliantly. She was
rather small, but had large dark eyes and a sweet disposition. The first
oboist of the orchestra, a good fellow as well as a clever musician, was
thoroughly devoted to her. He was looked upon as her fiance, but, owing to
some incident in his past, he was not allowed to visit at her parents’ house,
and the marriage was not to take place for a long time yet. When the
autumn of my year in Wurzburg drew near, I received an invitation from
friends to be present at a country wedding at a little distance from
Wurzburg; the oboist and his fiancee had also been invited. It was a jolly,
though primitive affair; we drank and danced, and I even tried my hand at
violin playing, but I must have forgotten it badly, for even with the second
violin I could not manage to satisfy the other musicians. But my success
with Friederike was all the greater; we danced like mad through the many
couples of peasants until at one moment we got so excited that, losing all
self-control, we embraced each other while her real lover was playing the
dance music. For the first time in my life I began to feel a flattering
sensation of self-respect when Friederike’s fiance, on seeing how we two
flirted, accepted the situation with good grace, if not without some sadness.
I had never had the chance of thinking that I could make a favourable
impression on any young girl. I never imagined myself good-looking,
neither had I ever thought it possible that I could attract the attention of
pretty girls.
On the other hand, I had gradually acquired a certain self-reliance in
mixing with men of my own age. Owing to the exceptional vivacity and
innate susceptibility of my nature—qualities which were brought home to
me in my relations with members of my circle—I gradually became
conscious of a certain power of transporting or bewildering my more
indolent companions.
From my poor oboist’s silent self-control on becoming aware of the
ardent advances of his betrothed towards me, I acquired, as I have said, the
first suggestion of the fact that I might count for something, not only among
came quietly to an end.
An infinitely more genuine affair was my love for Friederike Galvani, the
daughter of a mechanic, who was undoubtedly of Italian origin. She was
very musical, and had a lovely voice; my brother had patronised her and
helped her to a debut at his theatre, which test she stood brilliantly. She was
rather small, but had large dark eyes and a sweet disposition. The first
oboist of the orchestra, a good fellow as well as a clever musician, was
thoroughly devoted to her. He was looked upon as her fiance, but, owing to
some incident in his past, he was not allowed to visit at her parents’ house,
and the marriage was not to take place for a long time yet. When the
autumn of my year in Wurzburg drew near, I received an invitation from
friends to be present at a country wedding at a little distance from
Wurzburg; the oboist and his fiancee had also been invited. It was a jolly,
though primitive affair; we drank and danced, and I even tried my hand at
violin playing, but I must have forgotten it badly, for even with the second
violin I could not manage to satisfy the other musicians. But my success
with Friederike was all the greater; we danced like mad through the many
couples of peasants until at one moment we got so excited that, losing all
self-control, we embraced each other while her real lover was playing the
dance music. For the first time in my life I began to feel a flattering
sensation of self-respect when Friederike’s fiance, on seeing how we two
flirted, accepted the situation with good grace, if not without some sadness.
I had never had the chance of thinking that I could make a favourable
impression on any young girl. I never imagined myself good-looking,
neither had I ever thought it possible that I could attract the attention of
pretty girls.
On the other hand, I had gradually acquired a certain self-reliance in
mixing with men of my own age. Owing to the exceptional vivacity and
innate susceptibility of my nature—qualities which were brought home to
me in my relations with members of my circle—I gradually became
conscious of a certain power of transporting or bewildering my more
indolent companions.
From my poor oboist’s silent self-control on becoming aware of the
ardent advances of his betrothed towards me, I acquired, as I have said, the
first suggestion of the fact that I might count for something, not only among
Page 93
men, but also among women. The Frankish wine helped to bring about a
state of ever greater confusion, and under the cover of its influence I at
length declared myself, quite openly, to be Friederike’s lover. Ever so far
into the night, in fact, when day was already breaking, we set off home
together to Wurzburg in an open wagon. This was the crowning triumph of
my delightful adventure; for while all the others, including, in the end, the
jealous oboist, slept off their debauch in the face of the dawning day, I, with
my cheek against Friederike’s, and listening to the warbling of the larks,
watched the coming of the rising sun.
On the following day we had scarcely any idea of what had happened. A
certain sense of shame, which was not unbecoming, held us aloof from one
another: and yet I easily won access to Friederike’s family, and from that
time forward was daily a welcome guest, when for some hours I would
linger in unconcealed intimate intercourse with the same domestic circle
from which the unhappy betrothed remained excluded. No word was ever
mentioned of this last connection; never once did it even dawn upon
Friederike to effect any change in the state of affairs, and it seemed to strike
no one that I ought, so to speak, to take the fiance’s place. The confiding
manner in which I was received by all, and especially by the girl herself,
was exactly similar to one of Nature’s great processes, as, for instance,
when spring steps in and winter passes silently away. Not one of them ever
considered the material consequences of the change, and this is precisely
the most charming and flattering feature of this first youthful love affair,
which was never to degenerate into an attitude which might give rise to
suspicion or concern. These relations ended only with my departure from
Wurzburg, which was marked by the most touching and most tearful
leavetaking.
For some time, although I kept up no correspondence, the memory of this
episode remained firmly imprinted on my mind. Two years later, while
making a rapid journey through the old district, I once more visited
Friederike: the poor child approached me utterly shamefaced. Her oboist
was still her lover, and though his position rendered marriage impossible,
the unfortunate young woman had become a mother. I have heard nothing
more of her since.
Amid all this traffic of love I worked hard at my opera, and, thanks to the
loving sympathy of my sister Rosalie, I was able to find the necessary good
state of ever greater confusion, and under the cover of its influence I at
length declared myself, quite openly, to be Friederike’s lover. Ever so far
into the night, in fact, when day was already breaking, we set off home
together to Wurzburg in an open wagon. This was the crowning triumph of
my delightful adventure; for while all the others, including, in the end, the
jealous oboist, slept off their debauch in the face of the dawning day, I, with
my cheek against Friederike’s, and listening to the warbling of the larks,
watched the coming of the rising sun.
On the following day we had scarcely any idea of what had happened. A
certain sense of shame, which was not unbecoming, held us aloof from one
another: and yet I easily won access to Friederike’s family, and from that
time forward was daily a welcome guest, when for some hours I would
linger in unconcealed intimate intercourse with the same domestic circle
from which the unhappy betrothed remained excluded. No word was ever
mentioned of this last connection; never once did it even dawn upon
Friederike to effect any change in the state of affairs, and it seemed to strike
no one that I ought, so to speak, to take the fiance’s place. The confiding
manner in which I was received by all, and especially by the girl herself,
was exactly similar to one of Nature’s great processes, as, for instance,
when spring steps in and winter passes silently away. Not one of them ever
considered the material consequences of the change, and this is precisely
the most charming and flattering feature of this first youthful love affair,
which was never to degenerate into an attitude which might give rise to
suspicion or concern. These relations ended only with my departure from
Wurzburg, which was marked by the most touching and most tearful
leavetaking.
For some time, although I kept up no correspondence, the memory of this
episode remained firmly imprinted on my mind. Two years later, while
making a rapid journey through the old district, I once more visited
Friederike: the poor child approached me utterly shamefaced. Her oboist
was still her lover, and though his position rendered marriage impossible,
the unfortunate young woman had become a mother. I have heard nothing
more of her since.
Amid all this traffic of love I worked hard at my opera, and, thanks to the
loving sympathy of my sister Rosalie, I was able to find the necessary good
Page 94
spirits for the task. When at the commencement of the summer my earnings
as a conductor came to an end, this same sister again made it her business
loyally to provide me with ample pocket-money, so that I might devote
myself solely to the completion of my work, without troubling about
anything or being a burden to any one. At a much later date I came across a
letter of mine written to Rosalie in those days, which were full of a tender,
almost adoring love for that noble creature.
When the winter was at hand my brother returned, and the theatre
reopened. Truth to tell, I did not again become connected with it, but
acquired a position, which was even more prominent, in the concerts of the
Musical Society in which I produced my great overture in C major, my
symphony, and eventually portions of my new opera as well. An amateur
with a splendid voice, Mademoiselle Friedel, sang the great aria from Ada.
In addition to this, a trio was given which, in one of its passages, had such a
moving effect upon my brother, who took part in it, that, to his
astonishment, as he himself admitted, he completely lost his cue on account
of it.
By Christmas my work had come to an end, my score was written out
complete with the most laudable neatness, and now I was to return to
Leipzig for the New Year, in order to get my opera accepted by the theatre
there. On the way home I visited Nuremberg, where I stayed a week with
my sister Clara and with her husband, who were engaged at the theatre
there. I well remember how happy and comfortable I felt during this
pleasant visit to the very same relatives who a few years previously, when I
had stayed with them at Magdeburg, had been upset by my resolve to adopt
music as a calling. Now I had become a real musician, had written a grand
opera, and had already brought out many things without coming to grief.
The sense of all this was a great joy to me, while it was no less flattering to
my relatives, who could not fail to see that the supposed misfortune had in
the end proved to my advantage. I was in a jolly mood and quite
unrestrained—a state of mind which was very largely the result not only of
my brother-in-law’s cheerful and sociable household, but also of the
pleasant tavern life of the place. In a much more confident and elated spirit
I returned to Leipzig, where I was able to lay the three huge volumes of my
score before my highly delighted mother and sister.
as a conductor came to an end, this same sister again made it her business
loyally to provide me with ample pocket-money, so that I might devote
myself solely to the completion of my work, without troubling about
anything or being a burden to any one. At a much later date I came across a
letter of mine written to Rosalie in those days, which were full of a tender,
almost adoring love for that noble creature.
When the winter was at hand my brother returned, and the theatre
reopened. Truth to tell, I did not again become connected with it, but
acquired a position, which was even more prominent, in the concerts of the
Musical Society in which I produced my great overture in C major, my
symphony, and eventually portions of my new opera as well. An amateur
with a splendid voice, Mademoiselle Friedel, sang the great aria from Ada.
In addition to this, a trio was given which, in one of its passages, had such a
moving effect upon my brother, who took part in it, that, to his
astonishment, as he himself admitted, he completely lost his cue on account
of it.
By Christmas my work had come to an end, my score was written out
complete with the most laudable neatness, and now I was to return to
Leipzig for the New Year, in order to get my opera accepted by the theatre
there. On the way home I visited Nuremberg, where I stayed a week with
my sister Clara and with her husband, who were engaged at the theatre
there. I well remember how happy and comfortable I felt during this
pleasant visit to the very same relatives who a few years previously, when I
had stayed with them at Magdeburg, had been upset by my resolve to adopt
music as a calling. Now I had become a real musician, had written a grand
opera, and had already brought out many things without coming to grief.
The sense of all this was a great joy to me, while it was no less flattering to
my relatives, who could not fail to see that the supposed misfortune had in
the end proved to my advantage. I was in a jolly mood and quite
unrestrained—a state of mind which was very largely the result not only of
my brother-in-law’s cheerful and sociable household, but also of the
pleasant tavern life of the place. In a much more confident and elated spirit
I returned to Leipzig, where I was able to lay the three huge volumes of my
score before my highly delighted mother and sister.
Page 95
Just then my family was the richer for the return of my brother Julius
from his long wanderings. He had worked a good while in Paris as a
goldsmith, and had now set up for himself in that capacity in Leipzig. He
too, like the rest, was eager to hear something out of my opera, which, to be
sure, was not so easy, as I entirely lacked the gift of playing anything of the
sort in an easy and intelligible way. Only when I was able to work myself
into a state of absolute ecstasy was it possible for me to render something
with any effect. Rosalie knew that I meant it to draw a sort of declaration of
love from her; but I have never felt certain whether the embrace and the
sisterly kiss which were awarded me after I had sung my great aria from
Ada, were bestowed on me from real emotion or rather out of affectionate
regard. On the other hand, the zeal with which she urged my opera on the
director of the theatre, Ringelhardt, the conductor and the manager was
unmistakable, and she did it so effectually that she obtained their consent
for its performance, and that very speedily. I was particularly interested to
learn that the management immediately showed themselves eager to try to
settle the matter of the costumes for my drama: but I was astonished to hear
that the choice was in favour of oriental attire, whereas I had intended, by
the names I had selected, to suggest a northern character for the setting. But
it was precisely these names which they found unsuitable, as fairy
personages are not seen in the North, but only in the East; while apart from
this, the original by Gozzi, which formed the basis of the work,
undoubtedly bore an oriental character. It was with the utmost indignation
that I opposed the insufferable turban and caftan style of dress, and
vehemently advocated the knightly garb worn in the early years of the
Middle Ages. I then had to come to a thorough understanding with the
conductor, Stegmayer, on the subject of my score. He was a remarkable,
short, fat man, with fair curly hair, and an exceptionally jovial disposition;
he was, however, very hard to bring to a point. When over our wine we
always arrived at an understanding very quickly, but as soon as we sat at the
piano, I had to listen to the most extraordinary objections concerning the
trend of which I was for some time extremely puzzled. As the matter was
much delayed by this vacillation, I put myself into closer communication
with the stage manager of the opera, Hauser, who at that time was much
appreciated as a singer and patron of art by the people of Leipzig.
With this man, too, I had the strangest experiences: he who had
captivated the audiences of Leipzig, more especially with his impersonation
from his long wanderings. He had worked a good while in Paris as a
goldsmith, and had now set up for himself in that capacity in Leipzig. He
too, like the rest, was eager to hear something out of my opera, which, to be
sure, was not so easy, as I entirely lacked the gift of playing anything of the
sort in an easy and intelligible way. Only when I was able to work myself
into a state of absolute ecstasy was it possible for me to render something
with any effect. Rosalie knew that I meant it to draw a sort of declaration of
love from her; but I have never felt certain whether the embrace and the
sisterly kiss which were awarded me after I had sung my great aria from
Ada, were bestowed on me from real emotion or rather out of affectionate
regard. On the other hand, the zeal with which she urged my opera on the
director of the theatre, Ringelhardt, the conductor and the manager was
unmistakable, and she did it so effectually that she obtained their consent
for its performance, and that very speedily. I was particularly interested to
learn that the management immediately showed themselves eager to try to
settle the matter of the costumes for my drama: but I was astonished to hear
that the choice was in favour of oriental attire, whereas I had intended, by
the names I had selected, to suggest a northern character for the setting. But
it was precisely these names which they found unsuitable, as fairy
personages are not seen in the North, but only in the East; while apart from
this, the original by Gozzi, which formed the basis of the work,
undoubtedly bore an oriental character. It was with the utmost indignation
that I opposed the insufferable turban and caftan style of dress, and
vehemently advocated the knightly garb worn in the early years of the
Middle Ages. I then had to come to a thorough understanding with the
conductor, Stegmayer, on the subject of my score. He was a remarkable,
short, fat man, with fair curly hair, and an exceptionally jovial disposition;
he was, however, very hard to bring to a point. When over our wine we
always arrived at an understanding very quickly, but as soon as we sat at the
piano, I had to listen to the most extraordinary objections concerning the
trend of which I was for some time extremely puzzled. As the matter was
much delayed by this vacillation, I put myself into closer communication
with the stage manager of the opera, Hauser, who at that time was much
appreciated as a singer and patron of art by the people of Leipzig.
With this man, too, I had the strangest experiences: he who had
captivated the audiences of Leipzig, more especially with his impersonation
Page 96
of the barber and the Englishman in Fra Diavolo, suddenly revealed himself
in his own house as the most fanatical adherent of the most old-fashioned
music. I listened with astonishment to the scarcely veiled contempt with
which he treated even Mozart, and the only thing he seemed to regret was
that we had no operas by Sebastian Bach. After he had explained to me that
dramatic music had not actually been written yet, and that properly
speaking Gluck alone had shown any ability for it, he proceeded to what
seemed an exhaustive examination of my own opera, concerning which all I
had wished to hear from him was whether it was fit to be performed.
Instead of this, however, his object seemed to be to point out the failure of
my purpose in every number. I sweated blood under the unparalleled torture
of going through my work with this man; and I told my mother and sister of
my grave depression. All these delays had already succeeded in making it
impossible to perform my opera at the date originally fixed, and now it was
postponed until August of the current year (1834).
An incident which I shall never forget inspired me with fresh courage.
Old Bierey, an experienced and excellent musician, and in his day a
successful composer, who, thanks more particularly to his long practice as a
conductor at the Breslau theatre, had acquired a perfectly practical
knowledge of such things, was then living at Leipzig, and was a good friend
of my people. My mother and sister begged him to give his opinion about
the fitness of my opera for the stage, and I duly submitted the score to him.
I cannot say how deeply affected and impressed I was to see this old
gentleman appear one day among my relatives, and to hear him declare with
genuine enthusiasm that he simply could not understand how so young a
man could have composed such a score. His remarks concerning the
greatness which he had recognised in my talent were really irresistible, and
positively amazed me. When asked whether he considered the work
presentable and calculated to produce an effect, he declared his only regret
was that he was no longer at the head of a theatre, because, had he been, he
would have thought himself extremely lucky to secure such a man as
myself permanently for his enterprise. At this announcement my family was
overcome with joy, and their feelings were all the more justified seeing that,
as they all knew, Bierey was by no means an amiable romancer, but a
practical musician well seasoned by a life full of experience.
The delay was now borne with better spirits, and for a long time I was
able to wait hopefully for what the future might bring. Among other things,
in his own house as the most fanatical adherent of the most old-fashioned
music. I listened with astonishment to the scarcely veiled contempt with
which he treated even Mozart, and the only thing he seemed to regret was
that we had no operas by Sebastian Bach. After he had explained to me that
dramatic music had not actually been written yet, and that properly
speaking Gluck alone had shown any ability for it, he proceeded to what
seemed an exhaustive examination of my own opera, concerning which all I
had wished to hear from him was whether it was fit to be performed.
Instead of this, however, his object seemed to be to point out the failure of
my purpose in every number. I sweated blood under the unparalleled torture
of going through my work with this man; and I told my mother and sister of
my grave depression. All these delays had already succeeded in making it
impossible to perform my opera at the date originally fixed, and now it was
postponed until August of the current year (1834).
An incident which I shall never forget inspired me with fresh courage.
Old Bierey, an experienced and excellent musician, and in his day a
successful composer, who, thanks more particularly to his long practice as a
conductor at the Breslau theatre, had acquired a perfectly practical
knowledge of such things, was then living at Leipzig, and was a good friend
of my people. My mother and sister begged him to give his opinion about
the fitness of my opera for the stage, and I duly submitted the score to him.
I cannot say how deeply affected and impressed I was to see this old
gentleman appear one day among my relatives, and to hear him declare with
genuine enthusiasm that he simply could not understand how so young a
man could have composed such a score. His remarks concerning the
greatness which he had recognised in my talent were really irresistible, and
positively amazed me. When asked whether he considered the work
presentable and calculated to produce an effect, he declared his only regret
was that he was no longer at the head of a theatre, because, had he been, he
would have thought himself extremely lucky to secure such a man as
myself permanently for his enterprise. At this announcement my family was
overcome with joy, and their feelings were all the more justified seeing that,
as they all knew, Bierey was by no means an amiable romancer, but a
practical musician well seasoned by a life full of experience.
The delay was now borne with better spirits, and for a long time I was
able to wait hopefully for what the future might bring. Among other things,
Page 97
I now began to enjoy the company of a new friend in the person of Laube,
who at that time, although I had not set his Kosziusko to music, was at the
zenith of his fame. The first portion of his novel, Young Europe, the form of
which was epistolary, had appeared, and had a most stimulating effect on
me, more particularly in conjunction with all the youthful hopefulness
which at that time pulsated in my veins. Though his teaching was
essentially only a repetition of that in Heinse’s Ardinghello, the forces that
then surged in young breasts were given full and eloquent expression. The
guiding spirit of this tendency was followed in literary criticism, which was
aimed mainly at the supposed or actual incapacity of the semi-classical
occupants of our various literary thrones. Without the slightest mercy the
pedants,[6] among whom Tieck for one was numbered, were treated as sheer
encumbrances and hindrances to the rise of a new literature. That which led
to a remarkable revulsion of my feelings with regard to those German
composers who hitherto had been admired and respected, was partly the
influence of these critical skirmishes, and the luring sprightliness of their
tone; but mainly the impression made by a fresh visit of Schroder-Devrient
to Leipzig, when her rendering of Borneo in Bellini’s Romeo and Juliet
carried every one by storm. The effect of it was not to be compared with
anything that had been witnessed theretofore. To see the daring, romantic
figure of the youthful lover against a background of such obviously shallow
and empty music prompted one, at all events, to meditate doubtfully upon
the cause of the great lack of effect in solid German music as it had been
applied hitherto to the drama. Without for the moment plunging too deeply
into this meditation, I allowed myself to be borne along with the current of
my youthful feelings, then roused to ardour, and turned involuntarily to the
task of working off all that brooding seriousness which in my earlier years
had driven me to such pathetic mysticism.
[6] Zöpfe in the German text.—TRANSLATOR.
What Pohlenz had not done by his conducting of the Ninth Symphony,
what the Vienna Conservatoire, Dionys Weber, and many other clumsy
performances (which had led me to regard classical music as absolutely
colourless) had not fully accomplished, was achieved by the inconceivable
charm of the most unclassical Italian music, thanks to the wonderful,
thrilling, and entrancing impersonation of Romeo by Schroder-Devrient.
What effect such powerful, and as regards their causes, incomprehensible,
who at that time, although I had not set his Kosziusko to music, was at the
zenith of his fame. The first portion of his novel, Young Europe, the form of
which was epistolary, had appeared, and had a most stimulating effect on
me, more particularly in conjunction with all the youthful hopefulness
which at that time pulsated in my veins. Though his teaching was
essentially only a repetition of that in Heinse’s Ardinghello, the forces that
then surged in young breasts were given full and eloquent expression. The
guiding spirit of this tendency was followed in literary criticism, which was
aimed mainly at the supposed or actual incapacity of the semi-classical
occupants of our various literary thrones. Without the slightest mercy the
pedants,[6] among whom Tieck for one was numbered, were treated as sheer
encumbrances and hindrances to the rise of a new literature. That which led
to a remarkable revulsion of my feelings with regard to those German
composers who hitherto had been admired and respected, was partly the
influence of these critical skirmishes, and the luring sprightliness of their
tone; but mainly the impression made by a fresh visit of Schroder-Devrient
to Leipzig, when her rendering of Borneo in Bellini’s Romeo and Juliet
carried every one by storm. The effect of it was not to be compared with
anything that had been witnessed theretofore. To see the daring, romantic
figure of the youthful lover against a background of such obviously shallow
and empty music prompted one, at all events, to meditate doubtfully upon
the cause of the great lack of effect in solid German music as it had been
applied hitherto to the drama. Without for the moment plunging too deeply
into this meditation, I allowed myself to be borne along with the current of
my youthful feelings, then roused to ardour, and turned involuntarily to the
task of working off all that brooding seriousness which in my earlier years
had driven me to such pathetic mysticism.
[6] Zöpfe in the German text.—TRANSLATOR.
What Pohlenz had not done by his conducting of the Ninth Symphony,
what the Vienna Conservatoire, Dionys Weber, and many other clumsy
performances (which had led me to regard classical music as absolutely
colourless) had not fully accomplished, was achieved by the inconceivable
charm of the most unclassical Italian music, thanks to the wonderful,
thrilling, and entrancing impersonation of Romeo by Schroder-Devrient.
What effect such powerful, and as regards their causes, incomprehensible,
Page 98
effects had upon my opinion was shown in the frivolous way in which I was
able to contrive a short criticism of Weber’s Euryanthe for the Elegante
Zeitung. This opera had been performed by the Leipzig company shortly
before the appearance of Schroder-Devrient: cold and colourless
performers, among whom the singer in the title-role, appearing in the
wilderness with the full sleeves which were then the pink of fashion, is still
a disagreeable memory. Very laboriously, and without verve, but simply
with the object of satisfying the demands of classical rules, this company
did its utmost to dispel even the enthusiastic impressions of Weber’s music
which I had formed in my youth. I did not know what answer to make to a
brother critic of Laube’s, when he pointed out to me the laboured character
of this operatic performance, as soon as he was able to contrast it with the
entrancing effect of that Romeo evening. Here I found myself confronted
with a problem, the solving of which I was just at that time disposed to take
as easily as possible, and displayed my courage by discarding all prejudice,
and that daringly, in the short criticism just mentioned in which I simply
scoffed at Euryanthe. Just as I had had my season of wild oat sowing as a
student, so now I boldly rushed into the same courses in the development of
my artistic taste.
It was May, and beautiful spring weather, and a pleasure trip that I now
undertook with a friend into the promised land of my youthful romance,
Bohemia, was destined to bring the unrestrained ‘Young-European’ mood in
me to full maturity. This friend was Theodor Apel. I had known him a long
while, and had always felt particularly flattered by the fact that I had won
his hearty affection; for, as the son of the gifted master of metre and
imitator of Greek forms of poetry, August Apel, I felt that admiring
deference for him which I had never yet been able to bestow upon the
descendant of a famous man. Being well-to-do and of a good family, his
friendship gave me such opportunities of coming into touch with the easy
circumstances of the upper classes as were not of frequent occurrence in my
station of life. While my mother, for instance, regarded my association with
this highly respectable family with great satisfaction, I for my part was
extremely gratified at the thought of the cordiality with which I was
received in such circles.
Apel’s earnest wish was to become a poet, and I took it for granted that
he had all that was needed for such a calling; above all, what seemed to me
so important, the complete freedom that his considerable fortune assured
able to contrive a short criticism of Weber’s Euryanthe for the Elegante
Zeitung. This opera had been performed by the Leipzig company shortly
before the appearance of Schroder-Devrient: cold and colourless
performers, among whom the singer in the title-role, appearing in the
wilderness with the full sleeves which were then the pink of fashion, is still
a disagreeable memory. Very laboriously, and without verve, but simply
with the object of satisfying the demands of classical rules, this company
did its utmost to dispel even the enthusiastic impressions of Weber’s music
which I had formed in my youth. I did not know what answer to make to a
brother critic of Laube’s, when he pointed out to me the laboured character
of this operatic performance, as soon as he was able to contrast it with the
entrancing effect of that Romeo evening. Here I found myself confronted
with a problem, the solving of which I was just at that time disposed to take
as easily as possible, and displayed my courage by discarding all prejudice,
and that daringly, in the short criticism just mentioned in which I simply
scoffed at Euryanthe. Just as I had had my season of wild oat sowing as a
student, so now I boldly rushed into the same courses in the development of
my artistic taste.
It was May, and beautiful spring weather, and a pleasure trip that I now
undertook with a friend into the promised land of my youthful romance,
Bohemia, was destined to bring the unrestrained ‘Young-European’ mood in
me to full maturity. This friend was Theodor Apel. I had known him a long
while, and had always felt particularly flattered by the fact that I had won
his hearty affection; for, as the son of the gifted master of metre and
imitator of Greek forms of poetry, August Apel, I felt that admiring
deference for him which I had never yet been able to bestow upon the
descendant of a famous man. Being well-to-do and of a good family, his
friendship gave me such opportunities of coming into touch with the easy
circumstances of the upper classes as were not of frequent occurrence in my
station of life. While my mother, for instance, regarded my association with
this highly respectable family with great satisfaction, I for my part was
extremely gratified at the thought of the cordiality with which I was
received in such circles.
Apel’s earnest wish was to become a poet, and I took it for granted that
he had all that was needed for such a calling; above all, what seemed to me
so important, the complete freedom that his considerable fortune assured
Page 99
him by liberating him from all need of earning his living or of adopting a
profession for a livelihood. Strange to say, his mother, who on the death of
his distinguished father had married a Leipzig lawyer, was very anxious
about the vocation he should choose, and wished her son to make a fine
career in the law, as she was not at all disposed to favour his poetical gifts.
And it was to her attempts to convert me to her view, in order that by my
influence I might avert the calamity of a second poet in the family, in the
person of the son, that I owed the specially friendly relations that obtained
between herself and me. All her suggestions succeeded in doing, however,
was to stimulate me, even more than my own favourable opinion of his
talent could, to confirm my friend in his desire to be a poet, and thus to
support him in his rebellious attitude towards his family.
He was not displeased at this. As he was also studying music and
composed quite nicely, I succeeded in being on terms of the greatest
intimacy with him. The fact that he had spent the very year in which I had
sunk into the lowest depths of undergraduate madness, studying at
Heidelberg and not at Leipzig, had kept him unsullied by any share in my
strange excesses, and when we now met again at Leipzig, in the spring of
1834, the only thing that we still had in common was the aesthetic
aspiration of our lives, which we now strove by way of experiment to divert
into the direction of the enjoyment of life. Gladly would we have flung
ourselves into lively adventures if only the conditions of our environment
and of the whole middle-class world in which we lived had in any way
admitted of such things. Despite all the promptings of our instincts,
however, we got no further than planning this excursion to Bohemia. At all
events, it was something that we made the journey not by the post, but in
our own carriage, and our genuine pleasure continued to lie in the fact that
at Teplitz, for instance, we daily took long drives in a fine carriage. When in
the evening we had supped off trout at the Wilhelmsburg, drunk good
Czernosek wine with Bilin water, and duly excited ourselves over
Hoffmann, Beethoven, Shakespeare, Heinse’s Ardinghello, and other
matters, and then, with our limbs comfortably outstretched in our elegant
carriage, drove back in the summer twilight to the ‘King of Prussia,’ where
we occupied the large balcony-room on the first floor, we felt that we had
spent the day like young gods, and for sheer exuberance could think of
nothing better to do than to indulge in the most frightful quarrels which,
profession for a livelihood. Strange to say, his mother, who on the death of
his distinguished father had married a Leipzig lawyer, was very anxious
about the vocation he should choose, and wished her son to make a fine
career in the law, as she was not at all disposed to favour his poetical gifts.
And it was to her attempts to convert me to her view, in order that by my
influence I might avert the calamity of a second poet in the family, in the
person of the son, that I owed the specially friendly relations that obtained
between herself and me. All her suggestions succeeded in doing, however,
was to stimulate me, even more than my own favourable opinion of his
talent could, to confirm my friend in his desire to be a poet, and thus to
support him in his rebellious attitude towards his family.
He was not displeased at this. As he was also studying music and
composed quite nicely, I succeeded in being on terms of the greatest
intimacy with him. The fact that he had spent the very year in which I had
sunk into the lowest depths of undergraduate madness, studying at
Heidelberg and not at Leipzig, had kept him unsullied by any share in my
strange excesses, and when we now met again at Leipzig, in the spring of
1834, the only thing that we still had in common was the aesthetic
aspiration of our lives, which we now strove by way of experiment to divert
into the direction of the enjoyment of life. Gladly would we have flung
ourselves into lively adventures if only the conditions of our environment
and of the whole middle-class world in which we lived had in any way
admitted of such things. Despite all the promptings of our instincts,
however, we got no further than planning this excursion to Bohemia. At all
events, it was something that we made the journey not by the post, but in
our own carriage, and our genuine pleasure continued to lie in the fact that
at Teplitz, for instance, we daily took long drives in a fine carriage. When in
the evening we had supped off trout at the Wilhelmsburg, drunk good
Czernosek wine with Bilin water, and duly excited ourselves over
Hoffmann, Beethoven, Shakespeare, Heinse’s Ardinghello, and other
matters, and then, with our limbs comfortably outstretched in our elegant
carriage, drove back in the summer twilight to the ‘King of Prussia,’ where
we occupied the large balcony-room on the first floor, we felt that we had
spent the day like young gods, and for sheer exuberance could think of
nothing better to do than to indulge in the most frightful quarrels which,
Page 100
especially when the windows were open, would collect numbers of alarmed
listeners in the square before the inn.
One fine morning I stole away from my friend in order to take my
breakfast alone at the ‘Schlackenburg,’ and also to seize an opportunity of
jotting down the plan of a new operatic composition in my note-book. With
this end in view, I had mastered the subject of Shakespeare’s Measure for
Measure, which, in accordance with my present mood, I soon transformed
pretty freely into a libretto entitled Liebesverbot. Young Europe and
Ardinghello, and the strange frame of mind into which I had fallen with
regard to classical operatic music, furnished me with the keynote of my
conception, which was directed more particularly against puritanical
hypocrisy, and which thus tended boldly to exalt ‘unrestrained sensuality.’ I
took care to understand the grave Shakespearean theme only in this sense. I
could see only the gloomy strait-laced viceroy, his heart aflame with the
most passionate love for the beautiful novice, who, while she beseeches him
to pardon her brother condemned to death for illicit love, at the same time
kindles the most dangerous fire in the stubborn Puritan’s breast by infecting
him with the lovely warmth of her human emotion.
The fact that these powerful features are so richly developed in
Shakespeare’s creation only in order that, in the end, they may be weighed
all the more gravely in the scales of justice, was no concern of mine: all I
cared about was to expose the sinfulness of hypocrisy and the unnaturalness
of such cruel moral censure. Thus I completely dropped Measure for
Measure, and made the hypocrite be brought to justice only by the avenging
power of love. I transferred the theme from the fabulous city of Vienna to
the capital of sunny Sicily, in which a German viceroy, indignant at the
inconceivably loose morals of the people, attempts to introduce a
puritanical reform, and comes miserably to grief over it. Die Stumme von
Portici probably contributed to some extent to this theme, as did also certain
memories of Die Sizilianische Vesper. When I remember that at last even
the gentle Sicilian Bellini constituted a factor in this composition, I cannot,
to be sure, help smiling at the strange medley in which the most
extraordinary misunderstandings here took shape.
This remained for the present a mere draft. Studies from life destined for
my work were first to be carried out on this delightful excursion to
Bohemia. I led my friend in triumph to Prague, in the hope of securing the
listeners in the square before the inn.
One fine morning I stole away from my friend in order to take my
breakfast alone at the ‘Schlackenburg,’ and also to seize an opportunity of
jotting down the plan of a new operatic composition in my note-book. With
this end in view, I had mastered the subject of Shakespeare’s Measure for
Measure, which, in accordance with my present mood, I soon transformed
pretty freely into a libretto entitled Liebesverbot. Young Europe and
Ardinghello, and the strange frame of mind into which I had fallen with
regard to classical operatic music, furnished me with the keynote of my
conception, which was directed more particularly against puritanical
hypocrisy, and which thus tended boldly to exalt ‘unrestrained sensuality.’ I
took care to understand the grave Shakespearean theme only in this sense. I
could see only the gloomy strait-laced viceroy, his heart aflame with the
most passionate love for the beautiful novice, who, while she beseeches him
to pardon her brother condemned to death for illicit love, at the same time
kindles the most dangerous fire in the stubborn Puritan’s breast by infecting
him with the lovely warmth of her human emotion.
The fact that these powerful features are so richly developed in
Shakespeare’s creation only in order that, in the end, they may be weighed
all the more gravely in the scales of justice, was no concern of mine: all I
cared about was to expose the sinfulness of hypocrisy and the unnaturalness
of such cruel moral censure. Thus I completely dropped Measure for
Measure, and made the hypocrite be brought to justice only by the avenging
power of love. I transferred the theme from the fabulous city of Vienna to
the capital of sunny Sicily, in which a German viceroy, indignant at the
inconceivably loose morals of the people, attempts to introduce a
puritanical reform, and comes miserably to grief over it. Die Stumme von
Portici probably contributed to some extent to this theme, as did also certain
memories of Die Sizilianische Vesper. When I remember that at last even
the gentle Sicilian Bellini constituted a factor in this composition, I cannot,
to be sure, help smiling at the strange medley in which the most
extraordinary misunderstandings here took shape.
This remained for the present a mere draft. Studies from life destined for
my work were first to be carried out on this delightful excursion to
Bohemia. I led my friend in triumph to Prague, in the hope of securing the
Page 101
same impressions for him which had stirred me so profoundly when I was
there. We met my fair friends in the city itself; for, owing to the death of old
Count Pachta, material changes had taken place in the family, and the
surviving daughters no longer went to Pravonin. My behaviour was full of
arrogance, and by means of it I doubtless wished to vent a certain
capricious lust of revenge for the feelings of bitterness with which I had
taken leave of this circle some years previously. My friend was well
received. The changed family circumstances forced the charming girls ever
more and more imperatively to come to some decision as to their future,
and a wealthy bourgeois, though not exactly in trade himself, but in
possession of ample means, seemed to the anxious mother, at all events, a
good adviser. Without either showing or feeling any malice in the matter, I
expressed my pleasure at the sight of the strange confusion caused by
Theodor’s introduction into the family by the merriest and wildest jests: for
my only intercourse with the ladies consisted purely of jokes and friendly
chaff. They could not understand how it was that I had altered so strangely.
There was no longer any of that love of wrangling, that rage for instructing,
and that zeal in converting in me which formerly they had found so
irritating. But at the same time not a sensible word could I be made to utter,
and they who were now wanting to talk over many things seriously could
get nothing out of me save the wildest tomfoolery. As on this occasion, in
my character of an uncaged bird, I boldly allowed myself many a liberty
against which they felt themselves powerless, my exuberant spirits were
excited all the more when my friend, who was led away by my example,
tried to imitate me—a thing they took in very bad part from him.
there. We met my fair friends in the city itself; for, owing to the death of old
Count Pachta, material changes had taken place in the family, and the
surviving daughters no longer went to Pravonin. My behaviour was full of
arrogance, and by means of it I doubtless wished to vent a certain
capricious lust of revenge for the feelings of bitterness with which I had
taken leave of this circle some years previously. My friend was well
received. The changed family circumstances forced the charming girls ever
more and more imperatively to come to some decision as to their future,
and a wealthy bourgeois, though not exactly in trade himself, but in
possession of ample means, seemed to the anxious mother, at all events, a
good adviser. Without either showing or feeling any malice in the matter, I
expressed my pleasure at the sight of the strange confusion caused by
Theodor’s introduction into the family by the merriest and wildest jests: for
my only intercourse with the ladies consisted purely of jokes and friendly
chaff. They could not understand how it was that I had altered so strangely.
There was no longer any of that love of wrangling, that rage for instructing,
and that zeal in converting in me which formerly they had found so
irritating. But at the same time not a sensible word could I be made to utter,
and they who were now wanting to talk over many things seriously could
get nothing out of me save the wildest tomfoolery. As on this occasion, in
my character of an uncaged bird, I boldly allowed myself many a liberty
against which they felt themselves powerless, my exuberant spirits were
excited all the more when my friend, who was led away by my example,
tried to imitate me—a thing they took in very bad part from him.
Page 102
Only once was there any attempt at seriousness between us: I was sitting
at the piano, and was listening to my companion, who was telling the ladies
that in a conversation at the hotel I had found occasion to express myself
most warmly to some one who appeared to be surprised on hearing of the
domestic and industrious qualities of my lady friends. I was deeply moved
when, as the outcome of my companion’s remarks, I gathered what
unpleasant experiences the poor things had already been through: for what
seemed to me a very natural action on my part, appeared to fill them with
unexpected pleasure. Jenny, for instance, came up to me and hugged me
with great warmth. By general consent I was now granted the right of
behaving with almost studied rudeness, and I replied even to Jenny’s warm
outburst only with my usual banter.
In our hotel, the ‘Black Horse,’ which was so famous in those days, I
found the playground in which I was able to carry the mischievous spirit not
exhausted at the Pachta’s house to the point of recklessness. Out of the most
accidental material in table and travelling guests we succeeded in gathering
a company around us which allowed us, until far into the night, to lead it
into the most inconceivable follies. To all this I was incited more
particularly by the personality of a very timid and undersized business man
from Frankfort on the Oder, who longed to seem of a daring disposition;
and his presence stimulated me, if only owing to the remarkable chance it
gave me of coming into contact with some one who was at home in
Frankfort ‘on the Oder.’ Any one who knows how things then stood in
Austria can form some idea of my recklessness when I say that I once went
so far as to cause our symposium in the public room to bellow the
Marseillaise out loud into the night. Therefore, when after this heroic
exploit was over, and while I was undressing, I clambered on the outer
ledges of the windows from one room to the other on the second floor, I
naturally horrified those who did not know of the love of acrobatic feats
which I had cultivated in my earliest boyhood.
Even if I had exposed myself without fear to such dangers, I was soon
sobered down next morning by a summons from the police. When, in
addition to this, I recalled the singing of the Marseillaise, I was filled with
at the piano, and was listening to my companion, who was telling the ladies
that in a conversation at the hotel I had found occasion to express myself
most warmly to some one who appeared to be surprised on hearing of the
domestic and industrious qualities of my lady friends. I was deeply moved
when, as the outcome of my companion’s remarks, I gathered what
unpleasant experiences the poor things had already been through: for what
seemed to me a very natural action on my part, appeared to fill them with
unexpected pleasure. Jenny, for instance, came up to me and hugged me
with great warmth. By general consent I was now granted the right of
behaving with almost studied rudeness, and I replied even to Jenny’s warm
outburst only with my usual banter.
In our hotel, the ‘Black Horse,’ which was so famous in those days, I
found the playground in which I was able to carry the mischievous spirit not
exhausted at the Pachta’s house to the point of recklessness. Out of the most
accidental material in table and travelling guests we succeeded in gathering
a company around us which allowed us, until far into the night, to lead it
into the most inconceivable follies. To all this I was incited more
particularly by the personality of a very timid and undersized business man
from Frankfort on the Oder, who longed to seem of a daring disposition;
and his presence stimulated me, if only owing to the remarkable chance it
gave me of coming into contact with some one who was at home in
Frankfort ‘on the Oder.’ Any one who knows how things then stood in
Austria can form some idea of my recklessness when I say that I once went
so far as to cause our symposium in the public room to bellow the
Marseillaise out loud into the night. Therefore, when after this heroic
exploit was over, and while I was undressing, I clambered on the outer
ledges of the windows from one room to the other on the second floor, I
naturally horrified those who did not know of the love of acrobatic feats
which I had cultivated in my earliest boyhood.
Even if I had exposed myself without fear to such dangers, I was soon
sobered down next morning by a summons from the police. When, in
addition to this, I recalled the singing of the Marseillaise, I was filled with
Page 103
the gravest fears. After having been detained at the station a long time,
owing to a strange misunderstanding, the upshot of it was that the inspector
who was told off to examine me found that there was not sufficient time left
for a serious hearing, and, to my great relief, I was allowed to go after
replying to a few harmless questions concerning the intended length of my
stay. Nevertheless, we thought it advisable not to yield to the temptation of
playing any more pranks beneath the spread wings of the double eagle.
By means of a circuitous route into which we were led by our insatiable
longing for adventures—adventures which, as a matter of fact, occurred
only in our imagination, and which to all intents and purposes were but
modest diversions on the road—we at length got back to Leipzig. And with
this return home the really cheerful period of my life as a youth definitely
closed. If, up to that time, I had not been free from serious errors and
moments of passion, it was only now that care cast its first shadow across
my path.
My family had anxiously awaited my return in order to inform me that
the post of conductor had been offered to me by the Magdeburg Theatre
Company. This company during the current summer month was performing
at a watering place called Lauchstadt. The manager could not get on with an
incompetent conductor that had been sent to him, and in his extremity had
applied to Leipzig in the hope of getting a substitute forthwith. Stegmayer,
the conductor, who had no inclination to practise my score Feen during the
hot summer weather, as he had promised to do, promptly recommended me
for the post, and in that way really managed to shake off a very troublesome
tormentor. For although, on the one hand, I really desired to be able to
abandon myself freely and without restraint to the torrent of adventures that
constitute the artist’s life, yet a longing for independence, which could be
won only by my earning my own living, had been greatly strengthened in
me by the state of my affairs. Albeit, I had the feeling that a solid basis for
the gratification of this desire was not to be laid in Lauchstadt; nor did I
find it easy to assist the plot concocted against the production of my Feen. I
therefore determined to make a preliminary visit to the place just to see how
things stood.
This little watering-place had, in the days of Goethe and Schiller,
acquired a very wide reputation, its wooden theatre had been built
according to the design of the former, and the first performance of the Braut
owing to a strange misunderstanding, the upshot of it was that the inspector
who was told off to examine me found that there was not sufficient time left
for a serious hearing, and, to my great relief, I was allowed to go after
replying to a few harmless questions concerning the intended length of my
stay. Nevertheless, we thought it advisable not to yield to the temptation of
playing any more pranks beneath the spread wings of the double eagle.
By means of a circuitous route into which we were led by our insatiable
longing for adventures—adventures which, as a matter of fact, occurred
only in our imagination, and which to all intents and purposes were but
modest diversions on the road—we at length got back to Leipzig. And with
this return home the really cheerful period of my life as a youth definitely
closed. If, up to that time, I had not been free from serious errors and
moments of passion, it was only now that care cast its first shadow across
my path.
My family had anxiously awaited my return in order to inform me that
the post of conductor had been offered to me by the Magdeburg Theatre
Company. This company during the current summer month was performing
at a watering place called Lauchstadt. The manager could not get on with an
incompetent conductor that had been sent to him, and in his extremity had
applied to Leipzig in the hope of getting a substitute forthwith. Stegmayer,
the conductor, who had no inclination to practise my score Feen during the
hot summer weather, as he had promised to do, promptly recommended me
for the post, and in that way really managed to shake off a very troublesome
tormentor. For although, on the one hand, I really desired to be able to
abandon myself freely and without restraint to the torrent of adventures that
constitute the artist’s life, yet a longing for independence, which could be
won only by my earning my own living, had been greatly strengthened in
me by the state of my affairs. Albeit, I had the feeling that a solid basis for
the gratification of this desire was not to be laid in Lauchstadt; nor did I
find it easy to assist the plot concocted against the production of my Feen. I
therefore determined to make a preliminary visit to the place just to see how
things stood.
This little watering-place had, in the days of Goethe and Schiller,
acquired a very wide reputation, its wooden theatre had been built
according to the design of the former, and the first performance of the Braut
Page 104
von Messina had been given there. But although I repeated all this to
myself, the place made me feel rather doubtful. I asked for the house of the
director of the theatre. He proved to be out, but a small dirty boy, his son,
was told to take me to the theatre to find ‘Papa.’ Papa, however, met us on
the way. He was an elderly man; he wore a dressing-gown, and on his head
a cap. His delight at greeting me was interrupted by complaints about a
serious indisposition, for which his son was to fetch him a cordial from a
shop close by. Before despatching the boy on this errand he pressed a real
silver penny into his hand with a certain ostentation which was obviously
for my benefit. This person was Heinrich Bethmann, surviving husband of
the famous actress of that name, who, having lived in the heyday of the
German stage, had won the favour of the King of Prussia; and won it so
lastingly, that long after her death it had continued to be extended to her
spouse. He always drew a nice pension from the Prussian court, and
permanently enjoyed its support without ever being able to forfeit its
protection by his irregular and dissipated ways.
At the time of which I am speaking he had sunk to his lowest, owing to
continued theatre management. His speech and manners revealed the sugary
refinement of a bygone day, while all that he did and everything about him
testified to the most shameful neglect. He took me back to his house, where
he presented me to his second wife, who, crippled in one foot, lay on an
extraordinary couch while an elderly bass, concerning whose excessive
devotion Bethmann had already complained to me quite openly, smoked his
pipe beside her. From there the director took me to his stage manager, who
lived in the same house.
With the latter, who was just engaged in a consultation about the
repertory with the theatre attendant, a toothless old skeleton, he left me to
settle the necessary arrangements. As soon as Bethmann had gone,
Schmale, the stage manager, shrugged his shoulders and smiled, assuring
me that that was just the way of the director, to put everything on his back
and trouble himself about nothing. There he had been sitting for over an
hour, discussing with Kroge what should be put on next Sunday: it was all
very well his starting Don Juan, but how could he get a rehearsal carried
out, when the Merseburg town bandsmen, who formed the orchestra, would
not come over on Saturday to rehearse?
myself, the place made me feel rather doubtful. I asked for the house of the
director of the theatre. He proved to be out, but a small dirty boy, his son,
was told to take me to the theatre to find ‘Papa.’ Papa, however, met us on
the way. He was an elderly man; he wore a dressing-gown, and on his head
a cap. His delight at greeting me was interrupted by complaints about a
serious indisposition, for which his son was to fetch him a cordial from a
shop close by. Before despatching the boy on this errand he pressed a real
silver penny into his hand with a certain ostentation which was obviously
for my benefit. This person was Heinrich Bethmann, surviving husband of
the famous actress of that name, who, having lived in the heyday of the
German stage, had won the favour of the King of Prussia; and won it so
lastingly, that long after her death it had continued to be extended to her
spouse. He always drew a nice pension from the Prussian court, and
permanently enjoyed its support without ever being able to forfeit its
protection by his irregular and dissipated ways.
At the time of which I am speaking he had sunk to his lowest, owing to
continued theatre management. His speech and manners revealed the sugary
refinement of a bygone day, while all that he did and everything about him
testified to the most shameful neglect. He took me back to his house, where
he presented me to his second wife, who, crippled in one foot, lay on an
extraordinary couch while an elderly bass, concerning whose excessive
devotion Bethmann had already complained to me quite openly, smoked his
pipe beside her. From there the director took me to his stage manager, who
lived in the same house.
With the latter, who was just engaged in a consultation about the
repertory with the theatre attendant, a toothless old skeleton, he left me to
settle the necessary arrangements. As soon as Bethmann had gone,
Schmale, the stage manager, shrugged his shoulders and smiled, assuring
me that that was just the way of the director, to put everything on his back
and trouble himself about nothing. There he had been sitting for over an
hour, discussing with Kroge what should be put on next Sunday: it was all
very well his starting Don Juan, but how could he get a rehearsal carried
out, when the Merseburg town bandsmen, who formed the orchestra, would
not come over on Saturday to rehearse?
Page 105
All the time Schmale kept reaching out through the open window to a
cherry tree from which he picked and persistently ate the fruit, ejecting the
stones with a disagreeable noise. Now it was this last circumstance in
particular which decided me; for, strange to say, I have an innate aversion
from fruit. I informed the stage manager that he need not trouble at all about
Don Juan for Sunday, since for my part, if they had reckoned on my making
my first appearance at this performance, I must anyhow disappoint the
director, as I had no choice but to return at once to Leipzig, where I had to
put my affairs in order. This polite manner of tendering my absolute refusal
to accept the appointment—a conclusion I had quickly arrived at in my own
mind—forced me to practise some dissimulation, and made it necessary for
me to appear as if I really had some other purpose in coming to Lauchstadt.
This pretence in itself was quite unnecessary, seeing that I was quite
determined never to return there again.
People offered to help me in finding a lodging, and a young actor whom I
had chanced to know at Wurzburg undertook to be my guide in the matter.
While he was taking me to the best lodging he knew, he told me that
presently he would do me the kindness of making me the housemate of the
prettiest and nicest girl to be found in the place at the time. She was the
junior lead of the company, Mademoiselle Minna Planer, of whom
doubtless I had already heard.
As luck would have it, the promised damsel met us at the door of the
house in question. Her appearance and bearing formed the most striking
contrast possible to all the unpleasant impressions of the theatre which it
had been my lot to receive on this fateful morning. Looking very charming
and fresh, the young actress’s general manner and movements were full of a
certain majesty and grave assurance which lent an agreeable and captivating
air of dignity to her otherwise pleasant expression. Her scrupulously clean
and tidy dress completed the startling effect of the unexpected encounter.
After I had been introduced to her in the hall as the new conductor, and
after she had done regarding with astonishment the stranger who seemed so
young for such a title, she recommended me kindly to the landlady of the
house, and begged that I might be well looked after; whereupon she walked
proudly and serenely across the street to her rehearsal.
I engaged a room on the spot, agreed to Don Juan for Sunday, regretted
greatly that I had not brought my luggage with me from Leipzig, and
cherry tree from which he picked and persistently ate the fruit, ejecting the
stones with a disagreeable noise. Now it was this last circumstance in
particular which decided me; for, strange to say, I have an innate aversion
from fruit. I informed the stage manager that he need not trouble at all about
Don Juan for Sunday, since for my part, if they had reckoned on my making
my first appearance at this performance, I must anyhow disappoint the
director, as I had no choice but to return at once to Leipzig, where I had to
put my affairs in order. This polite manner of tendering my absolute refusal
to accept the appointment—a conclusion I had quickly arrived at in my own
mind—forced me to practise some dissimulation, and made it necessary for
me to appear as if I really had some other purpose in coming to Lauchstadt.
This pretence in itself was quite unnecessary, seeing that I was quite
determined never to return there again.
People offered to help me in finding a lodging, and a young actor whom I
had chanced to know at Wurzburg undertook to be my guide in the matter.
While he was taking me to the best lodging he knew, he told me that
presently he would do me the kindness of making me the housemate of the
prettiest and nicest girl to be found in the place at the time. She was the
junior lead of the company, Mademoiselle Minna Planer, of whom
doubtless I had already heard.
As luck would have it, the promised damsel met us at the door of the
house in question. Her appearance and bearing formed the most striking
contrast possible to all the unpleasant impressions of the theatre which it
had been my lot to receive on this fateful morning. Looking very charming
and fresh, the young actress’s general manner and movements were full of a
certain majesty and grave assurance which lent an agreeable and captivating
air of dignity to her otherwise pleasant expression. Her scrupulously clean
and tidy dress completed the startling effect of the unexpected encounter.
After I had been introduced to her in the hall as the new conductor, and
after she had done regarding with astonishment the stranger who seemed so
young for such a title, she recommended me kindly to the landlady of the
house, and begged that I might be well looked after; whereupon she walked
proudly and serenely across the street to her rehearsal.
I engaged a room on the spot, agreed to Don Juan for Sunday, regretted
greatly that I had not brought my luggage with me from Leipzig, and
Page 106
hastened to return thither as quickly as possible in order to get back to
Lauchstadt all the sooner. The die was cast. The serious side of life at once
confronted me in the form of significant experiences. At Leipzig I had to
take a furtive leave of Laube. At the instance of Prussia he had been warned
off Saxon soil, and he half guessed at the meaning which was to be attached
to this move. The time of undisguised reaction against the Liberal
movement of the early ‘thirties had set in: the fact that Laube was
concerned in no sort of political work, but had devoted himself merely to
literary activity, always aiming simply at aesthetic objects, made the action
of the police quite incomprehensible to us for the time being. The
disgusting ambiguity with which the Leipzig authorities answered all his
questions as to the cause of his expulsion soon gave him the strongest
suspicions as to what their intentions towards him actually were.
Leipzig, as the scene of his literary labours, being inestimably precious, it
mattered greatly to him to keep within reach of it. My friend Apel owned a
fine estate on Prussian soil, within but a few hours’ distance of Leipzig, and
we conceived the wish of seeing Laube hospitably harboured there. My
friend, who without infringing the legal stipulations was in a position to
give the persecuted man a place of refuge, immediately assented, and with
great readiness, to our desire, but confessed to us next day, after having
communicated with his family, that he thought he might incur some
unpleasantnesses if he entertained Laube. At this the latter smiled, and in a
manner I shall never forget, though I have noticed in the course of my life
that the expression which I then saw in his face was one which has often
flitted over my own features. He took his leave, and in a short time we
heard that he had been arrested, owing to having undertaken fresh
proceedings against former members of the Burschenschaft (Students’
League), and had been lodged in the municipal prison at Berlin. I had thus
had two experiences which weighed me down like lead, so I packed my
scanty portmanteau, took leave of my mother and sister, and, with a stout
heart, started on my career as a conductor.
In order to be able to look upon the little room under Minna’s lodging as
my new home, I was forced also to make the best of Bethmann’s theatrical
enterprise. As a matter of fact, a performance of Don Juan was given at
once, for the director, who prided himself on being a connoisseur of things
artistic, suggested that opera to me as one with which it would be wise for
an aspiring young artist, of a good family, to make his debut. Despite the
Lauchstadt all the sooner. The die was cast. The serious side of life at once
confronted me in the form of significant experiences. At Leipzig I had to
take a furtive leave of Laube. At the instance of Prussia he had been warned
off Saxon soil, and he half guessed at the meaning which was to be attached
to this move. The time of undisguised reaction against the Liberal
movement of the early ‘thirties had set in: the fact that Laube was
concerned in no sort of political work, but had devoted himself merely to
literary activity, always aiming simply at aesthetic objects, made the action
of the police quite incomprehensible to us for the time being. The
disgusting ambiguity with which the Leipzig authorities answered all his
questions as to the cause of his expulsion soon gave him the strongest
suspicions as to what their intentions towards him actually were.
Leipzig, as the scene of his literary labours, being inestimably precious, it
mattered greatly to him to keep within reach of it. My friend Apel owned a
fine estate on Prussian soil, within but a few hours’ distance of Leipzig, and
we conceived the wish of seeing Laube hospitably harboured there. My
friend, who without infringing the legal stipulations was in a position to
give the persecuted man a place of refuge, immediately assented, and with
great readiness, to our desire, but confessed to us next day, after having
communicated with his family, that he thought he might incur some
unpleasantnesses if he entertained Laube. At this the latter smiled, and in a
manner I shall never forget, though I have noticed in the course of my life
that the expression which I then saw in his face was one which has often
flitted over my own features. He took his leave, and in a short time we
heard that he had been arrested, owing to having undertaken fresh
proceedings against former members of the Burschenschaft (Students’
League), and had been lodged in the municipal prison at Berlin. I had thus
had two experiences which weighed me down like lead, so I packed my
scanty portmanteau, took leave of my mother and sister, and, with a stout
heart, started on my career as a conductor.
In order to be able to look upon the little room under Minna’s lodging as
my new home, I was forced also to make the best of Bethmann’s theatrical
enterprise. As a matter of fact, a performance of Don Juan was given at
once, for the director, who prided himself on being a connoisseur of things
artistic, suggested that opera to me as one with which it would be wise for
an aspiring young artist, of a good family, to make his debut. Despite the
Page 107
fact that, apart from some of my own instrumental compositions, I had
never yet conducted, and least of all in opera, the rehearsal and the
performance went off fairly well. Only once or twice did discrepancies
appear in the recitative of Donna Anna; yet this did not involve me in any
kind of hostility, and when I took my place unabashed and calm for the
production of Lumpaci Vagabundus, which I had practised very thoroughly,
the people generally seemed to have gained full confidence in the theatre’s
new acquisition.
The fact that I submitted without bitterness and even with some
cheerfulness to this unworthy use of my musical talent, was due less to my
taste being at this period, as I called it, in its salad days, than to my
intercourse with Minna Planer, who was employed in that magic trifle as the
Amorous Fairy. Indeed, in the midst of this dust-cloud of frivolity and
vulgarity, she always seemed very much like a fairy, the reasons of whose
descent into this giddy whirl, which of a truth seemed neither to carry her
away nor even to affect her, remained an absolute mystery. For while I
could discover nothing in the opera singers save the familiar stage
caricatures and grimaces, this fair actress differed wholly from those about
her in her unaffected soberness and dainty modesty, as also in the absence
of all theatrical pretence and stiltedness. There was only one young man
whom I could place beside Minna on the ground of qualities like those I
recognised in her. This fellow was Friedrich Schmitt, who had only just
adopted the stage as a career in the hope of making a ‘hit’ in opera, to
which, as the possessor of an excellent tenor voice, he felt himself called.
He too differed from the rest of the company, especially in the earnestness
which he brought to bear upon his studies and his work in general: the
soulful manly pitch of his chest voice, his clear, noble enunciation and
intelligent rendering of his words, have always remained as standards in my
memory. Owing to the fact that he was wholly devoid of theatrical talent,
and acted clumsily and awkwardly, a check was soon put to his progress,
but he always remained dear to me as a clever and original man of
trustworthy and upright character—my only associate.
But my dealings with my kind housemate soon became a cherished habit,
while she returned the ingenuously impetuous advances of the conductor of
one-and-twenty with a certain tolerant astonishment which, remote as it was
from all coquetry and ulterior motives, soon made familiar and friendly
intercourse possible with her. When, one evening, I returned late to my
never yet conducted, and least of all in opera, the rehearsal and the
performance went off fairly well. Only once or twice did discrepancies
appear in the recitative of Donna Anna; yet this did not involve me in any
kind of hostility, and when I took my place unabashed and calm for the
production of Lumpaci Vagabundus, which I had practised very thoroughly,
the people generally seemed to have gained full confidence in the theatre’s
new acquisition.
The fact that I submitted without bitterness and even with some
cheerfulness to this unworthy use of my musical talent, was due less to my
taste being at this period, as I called it, in its salad days, than to my
intercourse with Minna Planer, who was employed in that magic trifle as the
Amorous Fairy. Indeed, in the midst of this dust-cloud of frivolity and
vulgarity, she always seemed very much like a fairy, the reasons of whose
descent into this giddy whirl, which of a truth seemed neither to carry her
away nor even to affect her, remained an absolute mystery. For while I
could discover nothing in the opera singers save the familiar stage
caricatures and grimaces, this fair actress differed wholly from those about
her in her unaffected soberness and dainty modesty, as also in the absence
of all theatrical pretence and stiltedness. There was only one young man
whom I could place beside Minna on the ground of qualities like those I
recognised in her. This fellow was Friedrich Schmitt, who had only just
adopted the stage as a career in the hope of making a ‘hit’ in opera, to
which, as the possessor of an excellent tenor voice, he felt himself called.
He too differed from the rest of the company, especially in the earnestness
which he brought to bear upon his studies and his work in general: the
soulful manly pitch of his chest voice, his clear, noble enunciation and
intelligent rendering of his words, have always remained as standards in my
memory. Owing to the fact that he was wholly devoid of theatrical talent,
and acted clumsily and awkwardly, a check was soon put to his progress,
but he always remained dear to me as a clever and original man of
trustworthy and upright character—my only associate.
But my dealings with my kind housemate soon became a cherished habit,
while she returned the ingenuously impetuous advances of the conductor of
one-and-twenty with a certain tolerant astonishment which, remote as it was
from all coquetry and ulterior motives, soon made familiar and friendly
intercourse possible with her. When, one evening, I returned late to my
Page 108
ground-floor room, by climbing through the window, for I had no latch-key,
the noise of my entry brought Minna to her window just over mine.
Standing on my window ledge I begged her to allow me to bid her good-
night once more. She had not the slightest objection to this, but declared it
must be done from the window, as she always had her door locked by the
people of the house, and nobody could get in that way. She kindly
facilitated the handshake by leaning far out of her window, so that I could
take her hand as I stood on my ledge. When later on I had an attack of
erysipelas, from which I often suffered, and with my face all swollen and
frightfully distorted concealed myself from the world in my gloomy room,
Minna visited me repeatedly, nursed me, and assured me that my distorted
features did not matter in the least. On recovering, I paid her a visit and
complained of a rash that had remained round my mouth, and which
seemed so unpleasant that I apologised for showing it to her. This also she
made light of. Then I inferred she would not give me a kiss, whereupon she
at once gave me practical proof that she did not shrink from that either.
This was all done with a friendly serenity and composure that had
something almost motherly about it, and it was free from all suggestion of
frivolity or of heartlessness. In a few weeks the company had to leave
Lauchstadt to proceed to Rudolstadt and fulfil a special engagement there. I
was particularly anxious to make this journey, which in those days was an
arduous undertaking, in Minna’s company, and if only I had succeeded in
getting my well-earned salary duly paid by Bethmann, nothing would have
hindered the fulfilment of my wish. But in this matter I encountered
exceptional difficulties, which in the course of eventful years grew in
chronic fashion into the strangest of ailments. Even at Lauchstadt I had
discovered that there was only one man who drew his salary in full, namely
the bass Kneisel, whom I had seen smoking his pipe beside the couch of the
director’s lame wife. I was assured that if I cared greatly about getting some
of my wages from time to time, I could obtain this favour only by paying
court to Mme. Bethmann. This time I preferred once more to appeal to my
family for help, and therefore travelled to Rudolstadt through Leipzig,
where, to the sad astonishment of my mother, I had to replenish my coffer
with the necessary supplies. On the way to Leipzig I had travelled with
Apel through his estate, he having fetched me from Lauchstadt for the
purpose. His arrival was fixed in my memory by a noisy banquet which my
wealthy friend gave at the hotel in my honour. It was on this occasion that I
the noise of my entry brought Minna to her window just over mine.
Standing on my window ledge I begged her to allow me to bid her good-
night once more. She had not the slightest objection to this, but declared it
must be done from the window, as she always had her door locked by the
people of the house, and nobody could get in that way. She kindly
facilitated the handshake by leaning far out of her window, so that I could
take her hand as I stood on my ledge. When later on I had an attack of
erysipelas, from which I often suffered, and with my face all swollen and
frightfully distorted concealed myself from the world in my gloomy room,
Minna visited me repeatedly, nursed me, and assured me that my distorted
features did not matter in the least. On recovering, I paid her a visit and
complained of a rash that had remained round my mouth, and which
seemed so unpleasant that I apologised for showing it to her. This also she
made light of. Then I inferred she would not give me a kiss, whereupon she
at once gave me practical proof that she did not shrink from that either.
This was all done with a friendly serenity and composure that had
something almost motherly about it, and it was free from all suggestion of
frivolity or of heartlessness. In a few weeks the company had to leave
Lauchstadt to proceed to Rudolstadt and fulfil a special engagement there. I
was particularly anxious to make this journey, which in those days was an
arduous undertaking, in Minna’s company, and if only I had succeeded in
getting my well-earned salary duly paid by Bethmann, nothing would have
hindered the fulfilment of my wish. But in this matter I encountered
exceptional difficulties, which in the course of eventful years grew in
chronic fashion into the strangest of ailments. Even at Lauchstadt I had
discovered that there was only one man who drew his salary in full, namely
the bass Kneisel, whom I had seen smoking his pipe beside the couch of the
director’s lame wife. I was assured that if I cared greatly about getting some
of my wages from time to time, I could obtain this favour only by paying
court to Mme. Bethmann. This time I preferred once more to appeal to my
family for help, and therefore travelled to Rudolstadt through Leipzig,
where, to the sad astonishment of my mother, I had to replenish my coffer
with the necessary supplies. On the way to Leipzig I had travelled with
Apel through his estate, he having fetched me from Lauchstadt for the
purpose. His arrival was fixed in my memory by a noisy banquet which my
wealthy friend gave at the hotel in my honour. It was on this occasion that I
Page 109
and one of the other guests succeeded in completely destroying a huge,
massively built Dutch-tile stove, such as we had in our room at the inn.
Next morning none of us could understand how it had happened.
It was on this journey to Rudolstadt that I first passed through Weimar,
where on a rainy day I strolled with curiosity, but without emotion, towards
Goethe’s house. I had pictured something rather different, and thought I
should experience livelier impressions from the active theatre life of
Rudolstadt, to which I felt strongly attracted. In spite of the fact that I was
not to be conductor myself, this post having been entrusted to the leader of
the royal orchestra, who had been specially engaged for our performances,
yet I was so fully occupied with rehearsals for the many operas and musical
comedies required to regale the frivolous public of the principality that I
found no leisure for excursions into the charming regions of this little land.
In addition to these severe and ill-paid labours, two passions held me
chained during the six weeks of my stay in Rudolstadt. These were, first, a
longing to write the libretto of Liebesverbot; and secondly, my growing
attachment to Minna. It is true, I sketched out a musical composition about
this time, a symphony in E major, whose first movement (3/4 time) I
completed as a separate piece. As regards style and design, this work was
suggested by Beethoven’s Seventh and Eighth Symphonies, and, so far as I
can remember, I should have had no need to be ashamed of it, had I been
able to complete it, or keep the part I had actually finished. But I had
already begun at this time to form the opinion that, to produce anything
fresh and truly noteworthy in the realm of symphony, and according to
Beethoven’s methods, was an impossibility. Whereas opera, to which I felt
inwardly drawn, though I had no real example I wished to copy, presented
itself to my mind in varied and alluring shapes as a most fascinating form of
art. Thus, amid manifold and passionate agitations, and in the few leisure
hours which were left to me, I completed the greater part of my operatic
poem, taking infinitely more pains, both as regards words and versification,
than with the text of my earlier Feen. Moreover, I found myself possessed
of incomparably greater assurance in the arrangement and partial invention
of situations than when writing that earlier work.
On the other hand, I now began for the first time to experience the cares
and worries of a lover’s jealousy. A change, to me inexplicable, manifested
itself in Minna’s hitherto unaffected and gentle manner towards me. It
appears that my artless solicitations for her favour, by which at that time I
massively built Dutch-tile stove, such as we had in our room at the inn.
Next morning none of us could understand how it had happened.
It was on this journey to Rudolstadt that I first passed through Weimar,
where on a rainy day I strolled with curiosity, but without emotion, towards
Goethe’s house. I had pictured something rather different, and thought I
should experience livelier impressions from the active theatre life of
Rudolstadt, to which I felt strongly attracted. In spite of the fact that I was
not to be conductor myself, this post having been entrusted to the leader of
the royal orchestra, who had been specially engaged for our performances,
yet I was so fully occupied with rehearsals for the many operas and musical
comedies required to regale the frivolous public of the principality that I
found no leisure for excursions into the charming regions of this little land.
In addition to these severe and ill-paid labours, two passions held me
chained during the six weeks of my stay in Rudolstadt. These were, first, a
longing to write the libretto of Liebesverbot; and secondly, my growing
attachment to Minna. It is true, I sketched out a musical composition about
this time, a symphony in E major, whose first movement (3/4 time) I
completed as a separate piece. As regards style and design, this work was
suggested by Beethoven’s Seventh and Eighth Symphonies, and, so far as I
can remember, I should have had no need to be ashamed of it, had I been
able to complete it, or keep the part I had actually finished. But I had
already begun at this time to form the opinion that, to produce anything
fresh and truly noteworthy in the realm of symphony, and according to
Beethoven’s methods, was an impossibility. Whereas opera, to which I felt
inwardly drawn, though I had no real example I wished to copy, presented
itself to my mind in varied and alluring shapes as a most fascinating form of
art. Thus, amid manifold and passionate agitations, and in the few leisure
hours which were left to me, I completed the greater part of my operatic
poem, taking infinitely more pains, both as regards words and versification,
than with the text of my earlier Feen. Moreover, I found myself possessed
of incomparably greater assurance in the arrangement and partial invention
of situations than when writing that earlier work.
On the other hand, I now began for the first time to experience the cares
and worries of a lover’s jealousy. A change, to me inexplicable, manifested
itself in Minna’s hitherto unaffected and gentle manner towards me. It
appears that my artless solicitations for her favour, by which at that time I
Page 110
meant nothing serious, and in which a man of the world would merely have
seen the exuberance of a youthful and easily satisfied infatuation, had given
rise to certain remarks and comments upon the popular actress. I was
astonished to learn, first from her reserved manner, and later from her own
lips, that she felt compelled to inquire into the seriousness of my intentions,
and to consider their consequences. She was at that time, as I had already
discovered, on very intimate terms with a young nobleman, whose
acquaintance I first made in Lauchstadt, where he used to visit her. I had
already realised on that occasion that he was unfeignedly and cordially
attached to her; in fact, in the circle of her friends she was regarded as
engaged to Herr von O., although it was obvious that marriage was out of
the question, as the young lover was quite without means, and owing to the
high standing of his family it was essential that he should sacrifice himself
to a marriage of convenience, both on account of his social position and of
the career which he would have to adopt. During this stay at Rudolstadt
Minna appears to have gathered certain information on this point which
troubled and depressed her, thus rendering her more inclined to treat my
impetuous attempts at courtship with cool reserve.
After mature deliberation I recognised that, in any case, Young Europe,
Ardinghello, and Liebesverbot could not be produced at Rudolstadt; but it
was a very different matter for the Fee Amorosa, with its merry theatrical
mood, and an Ehrlicher Burger Kind to seek a decent livelihood. Therefore,
greatly discouraged, I proceeded to accentuate the more extravagant
situations of my Liebesverbot by rioting with a few comrades in the
sausage-scented atmosphere of the Rudolstadt Vogelwiese. At this time my
troubles again brought me more or less into contact with the vice of
gambling, although on this occasion it only cast temporary fetters about me
in the very harmless form of the dice and roulette-tables out on the open
market-place.
We were looking forward to the time when we should leave Rudolstadt
for the half-yearly winter season at the capital, Magdeburg, mainly because
I should there resume my place at the head of the orchestra, and might in
any case count on a better reward for my musical efforts. But before
returning to Magdeburg I had to endure a trying interval at Bernburg, where
Bethmann, the director, in addition to his other undertakings, had also
promised sundry theatrical performances. During our brief stay in the town
I had to arrange for the presentation, with a mere fraction of the company,
seen the exuberance of a youthful and easily satisfied infatuation, had given
rise to certain remarks and comments upon the popular actress. I was
astonished to learn, first from her reserved manner, and later from her own
lips, that she felt compelled to inquire into the seriousness of my intentions,
and to consider their consequences. She was at that time, as I had already
discovered, on very intimate terms with a young nobleman, whose
acquaintance I first made in Lauchstadt, where he used to visit her. I had
already realised on that occasion that he was unfeignedly and cordially
attached to her; in fact, in the circle of her friends she was regarded as
engaged to Herr von O., although it was obvious that marriage was out of
the question, as the young lover was quite without means, and owing to the
high standing of his family it was essential that he should sacrifice himself
to a marriage of convenience, both on account of his social position and of
the career which he would have to adopt. During this stay at Rudolstadt
Minna appears to have gathered certain information on this point which
troubled and depressed her, thus rendering her more inclined to treat my
impetuous attempts at courtship with cool reserve.
After mature deliberation I recognised that, in any case, Young Europe,
Ardinghello, and Liebesverbot could not be produced at Rudolstadt; but it
was a very different matter for the Fee Amorosa, with its merry theatrical
mood, and an Ehrlicher Burger Kind to seek a decent livelihood. Therefore,
greatly discouraged, I proceeded to accentuate the more extravagant
situations of my Liebesverbot by rioting with a few comrades in the
sausage-scented atmosphere of the Rudolstadt Vogelwiese. At this time my
troubles again brought me more or less into contact with the vice of
gambling, although on this occasion it only cast temporary fetters about me
in the very harmless form of the dice and roulette-tables out on the open
market-place.
We were looking forward to the time when we should leave Rudolstadt
for the half-yearly winter season at the capital, Magdeburg, mainly because
I should there resume my place at the head of the orchestra, and might in
any case count on a better reward for my musical efforts. But before
returning to Magdeburg I had to endure a trying interval at Bernburg, where
Bethmann, the director, in addition to his other undertakings, had also
promised sundry theatrical performances. During our brief stay in the town
I had to arrange for the presentation, with a mere fraction of the company,
Page 111
of several operas, which were again to be conducted by the royal conductor
of the place. But in addition to these professional labours, I had to endure
such a meagre, ill-provided and grievously farcical existence as was enough
to disgust me, if not for ever, at any rate for the time being, with the
wretched profession of a theatrical conductor. Yet I survived even this, and
Magdeburg was destined to lead me eventually to the real glory of my
adopted profession.
The sensation of sitting in command at the very conductor’s desk from
which, not many years before, the great master Kuhnlein had so moved the
perplexed young enthusiast by the weighty wisdom of his musical
directorship, was not without its charm for me, and, indeed, I very quickly
succeeded in obtaining perfect confidence in conducting an orchestra. I was
soon a persona grata with the excellent musicians of the orchestra. Their
splendid combination in spirited overtures, which, especially towards the
finale, I generally took at an unheard-of speed, often earned for us all the
intoxicating applause of the public. The achievements of my fiery and often
exuberant zeal won me recognition from the singers, and were greeted by
the audience with rapturous appreciation. As in Magdeburg, at least in those
days, the art of theatrical criticism was but slightly developed, this universal
satisfaction was a great encouragement, and at the end of the first three
months of my Magdeburg conductorship I felt sustained by the flattering
and comforting assurance that I was one of the bigwigs of opera. Under
these circumstances, Schmale, the stage manager, who has been my good
friend ever since, proposed a special gala performance for New Year’s Day,
which he felt sure would be a triumph. I was to compose the necessary
music. This was very speedily done; a rousing overture, several melodramas
and choruses were all greeted with enthusiasm, and brought us such ample
applause that we repeated the performance with great success, although
such repetitions after the actual gala day were quite contrary to usage.
With the new year (1835) there came a decisive turning-point in my life.
After the rupture between Minna and myself at Rudolstadt, we had been to
some extent lost to one another; but our friendship was resumed on our
meeting again in Magdeburg; this time, however, it remained cool and
purposely indifferent. When she first appeared in the town, a year before,
her beauty had attracted considerable notice, and I now learned that she was
the object of great attention from several young noblemen, and had shown
herself not unmoved by the compliment implied by their visits. Although
of the place. But in addition to these professional labours, I had to endure
such a meagre, ill-provided and grievously farcical existence as was enough
to disgust me, if not for ever, at any rate for the time being, with the
wretched profession of a theatrical conductor. Yet I survived even this, and
Magdeburg was destined to lead me eventually to the real glory of my
adopted profession.
The sensation of sitting in command at the very conductor’s desk from
which, not many years before, the great master Kuhnlein had so moved the
perplexed young enthusiast by the weighty wisdom of his musical
directorship, was not without its charm for me, and, indeed, I very quickly
succeeded in obtaining perfect confidence in conducting an orchestra. I was
soon a persona grata with the excellent musicians of the orchestra. Their
splendid combination in spirited overtures, which, especially towards the
finale, I generally took at an unheard-of speed, often earned for us all the
intoxicating applause of the public. The achievements of my fiery and often
exuberant zeal won me recognition from the singers, and were greeted by
the audience with rapturous appreciation. As in Magdeburg, at least in those
days, the art of theatrical criticism was but slightly developed, this universal
satisfaction was a great encouragement, and at the end of the first three
months of my Magdeburg conductorship I felt sustained by the flattering
and comforting assurance that I was one of the bigwigs of opera. Under
these circumstances, Schmale, the stage manager, who has been my good
friend ever since, proposed a special gala performance for New Year’s Day,
which he felt sure would be a triumph. I was to compose the necessary
music. This was very speedily done; a rousing overture, several melodramas
and choruses were all greeted with enthusiasm, and brought us such ample
applause that we repeated the performance with great success, although
such repetitions after the actual gala day were quite contrary to usage.
With the new year (1835) there came a decisive turning-point in my life.
After the rupture between Minna and myself at Rudolstadt, we had been to
some extent lost to one another; but our friendship was resumed on our
meeting again in Magdeburg; this time, however, it remained cool and
purposely indifferent. When she first appeared in the town, a year before,
her beauty had attracted considerable notice, and I now learned that she was
the object of great attention from several young noblemen, and had shown
herself not unmoved by the compliment implied by their visits. Although
Page 112
her reputation, thanks to her absolute discretion and self-respect, remained
beyond reproach, my objection to her receiving such attentions grew very
strong, owing possibly, in some degree, to the memory of the sorrows I had
endured in Pachta’s house in Prague. Although Minna assured me that the
conduct of these gentlemen was much more discreet and decent than that of
theatre-goers of the bourgeois class, and especially than that of certain
young musical conductors, she never succeeded in soothing the bitterness
and insistence with which I protested against her acceptance of such
attentions. So we spent three unhappy months in ever-increasing
estrangement, and at the same time, in half-frantic despair, I pretended to be
fond of the most undesirable associates, and acted in every way with such
blatant levity that Minna, as she told me afterwards, was filled with the
deepest anxiety and solicitude concerning me. Moreover, as the ladies of the
opera company were not slow to pay court to their youthful conductor, and
especially as one young woman, whose reputation was not spotless, openly
set her cap at me, this anxiety of Minna’s seems at last to have culminated
in a definite decision. I hit upon the idea of treating the elite of our opera
company to oysters and punch in my own room on New Year’s Eve. The
married couples were invited, and then came the question whether Fraulein
Planer would consent to take part in such a festivity. She accepted quite
ingenuously, and presented herself, as neatly and becomingly dressed as
ever, in my bachelor apartments, where things soon grew pretty lively. I had
already warned my landlord that we were not likely to be very quiet, and
reassured him as to any possible damage to his furniture. What the
champagne failed to accomplish, the punch eventually succeeded in doing;
all the restraints of petty conventionality, which the company usually
endeavoured to observe, were cast aside, giving place to an unreserved
demeanour all round, to which no one objected. And then it was that
Minna’s queenly dignity distinguished her from all her companions. She
never lost her self-respect; and whilst no one ventured to take the slightest
liberty with her, every one very clearly recognised the simple candour with
which she responded to my kindly and solicitous attentions. They could not
fail to see that the link existing between us was not to be compared to any
ordinary liaison, and we had the satisfaction of seeing the flighty young
lady who had so openly angled for me fall into a fit over the discovery.
From that time onward I remained permanently on the best of terms with
Minna. I do not believe that she ever felt any sort of passion or genuine love
beyond reproach, my objection to her receiving such attentions grew very
strong, owing possibly, in some degree, to the memory of the sorrows I had
endured in Pachta’s house in Prague. Although Minna assured me that the
conduct of these gentlemen was much more discreet and decent than that of
theatre-goers of the bourgeois class, and especially than that of certain
young musical conductors, she never succeeded in soothing the bitterness
and insistence with which I protested against her acceptance of such
attentions. So we spent three unhappy months in ever-increasing
estrangement, and at the same time, in half-frantic despair, I pretended to be
fond of the most undesirable associates, and acted in every way with such
blatant levity that Minna, as she told me afterwards, was filled with the
deepest anxiety and solicitude concerning me. Moreover, as the ladies of the
opera company were not slow to pay court to their youthful conductor, and
especially as one young woman, whose reputation was not spotless, openly
set her cap at me, this anxiety of Minna’s seems at last to have culminated
in a definite decision. I hit upon the idea of treating the elite of our opera
company to oysters and punch in my own room on New Year’s Eve. The
married couples were invited, and then came the question whether Fraulein
Planer would consent to take part in such a festivity. She accepted quite
ingenuously, and presented herself, as neatly and becomingly dressed as
ever, in my bachelor apartments, where things soon grew pretty lively. I had
already warned my landlord that we were not likely to be very quiet, and
reassured him as to any possible damage to his furniture. What the
champagne failed to accomplish, the punch eventually succeeded in doing;
all the restraints of petty conventionality, which the company usually
endeavoured to observe, were cast aside, giving place to an unreserved
demeanour all round, to which no one objected. And then it was that
Minna’s queenly dignity distinguished her from all her companions. She
never lost her self-respect; and whilst no one ventured to take the slightest
liberty with her, every one very clearly recognised the simple candour with
which she responded to my kindly and solicitous attentions. They could not
fail to see that the link existing between us was not to be compared to any
ordinary liaison, and we had the satisfaction of seeing the flighty young
lady who had so openly angled for me fall into a fit over the discovery.
From that time onward I remained permanently on the best of terms with
Minna. I do not believe that she ever felt any sort of passion or genuine love
Page 113
for me, or, indeed, that she was capable of such a thing, and I can therefore
only describe her feeling for me as one of heartfelt goodwill, and the
sincerest desire for my success and prosperity, inspired as she was with the
kindest sympathy, and genuine delight at, and admiration for, my talents.
All this at last became part of her nature. She obviously had a very
favourable opinion of my abilities, though she was surprised at the rapidity
of my success. My eccentric nature, which she knew so well how to humour
pleasantly by her gentleness, stimulated her to the continual exercise of the
power, so flattering to her own vanity, and without ever betraying any
desire or ardour herself, she never met my impetuous advances with
coldness.
At the Magdeburg theatre I had already made the acquaintance of a very
interesting woman called Mme. Haas. She was an actress, no longer in her
first youth, and played so-called ‘chaperone’s parts.’ This lady won my
sympathy by telling me she had been friendly ever since her youth with
Laube, in whose destiny she continued to take a heartfelt and cordial
interest. She was clever, but far from happy, and an unprepossessing
exterior, which with the lapse of years grew more uninviting, did not tend to
make her any happier. She lived in meagre circumstances, with one child,
and appeared to remember her better days with a bitter grief. My first visit
to her was paid merely to inquire after Laube’s fate, but I soon became a
frequent and familiar caller. As she and Minna speedily became fast friends,
we three often spent pleasant evenings talking together. But when, later on,
a certain jealousy manifested itself on the part of the elder woman towards
the younger, our confidential relations were more or less disturbed, for it
particularly grieved me to hear Minna’s talents and mental gifts criticised
by the other. One evening I had promised Minna to have tea with her and
Mme. Haas, but I had thoughtlessly promised to go to a whist party first.
This engagement I purposely prolonged, much as it wearied me, in the
deliberate hope that her companion—who had already grown irksome to me
—might have left before my arrival. The only way in which I could do this
was by drinking hard, so that I had the very unusual experience of rising
from a sober whist party in a completely fuddled condition, into which I
had imperceptibly fallen, and in which I refused to believe. This incredulity
deluded me into keeping my engagement for tea, although it was so late. To
my intense disgust the elder woman was still there when I arrived, and her
presence at once had the effect of rousing my tipsiness to a violent
only describe her feeling for me as one of heartfelt goodwill, and the
sincerest desire for my success and prosperity, inspired as she was with the
kindest sympathy, and genuine delight at, and admiration for, my talents.
All this at last became part of her nature. She obviously had a very
favourable opinion of my abilities, though she was surprised at the rapidity
of my success. My eccentric nature, which she knew so well how to humour
pleasantly by her gentleness, stimulated her to the continual exercise of the
power, so flattering to her own vanity, and without ever betraying any
desire or ardour herself, she never met my impetuous advances with
coldness.
At the Magdeburg theatre I had already made the acquaintance of a very
interesting woman called Mme. Haas. She was an actress, no longer in her
first youth, and played so-called ‘chaperone’s parts.’ This lady won my
sympathy by telling me she had been friendly ever since her youth with
Laube, in whose destiny she continued to take a heartfelt and cordial
interest. She was clever, but far from happy, and an unprepossessing
exterior, which with the lapse of years grew more uninviting, did not tend to
make her any happier. She lived in meagre circumstances, with one child,
and appeared to remember her better days with a bitter grief. My first visit
to her was paid merely to inquire after Laube’s fate, but I soon became a
frequent and familiar caller. As she and Minna speedily became fast friends,
we three often spent pleasant evenings talking together. But when, later on,
a certain jealousy manifested itself on the part of the elder woman towards
the younger, our confidential relations were more or less disturbed, for it
particularly grieved me to hear Minna’s talents and mental gifts criticised
by the other. One evening I had promised Minna to have tea with her and
Mme. Haas, but I had thoughtlessly promised to go to a whist party first.
This engagement I purposely prolonged, much as it wearied me, in the
deliberate hope that her companion—who had already grown irksome to me
—might have left before my arrival. The only way in which I could do this
was by drinking hard, so that I had the very unusual experience of rising
from a sober whist party in a completely fuddled condition, into which I
had imperceptibly fallen, and in which I refused to believe. This incredulity
deluded me into keeping my engagement for tea, although it was so late. To
my intense disgust the elder woman was still there when I arrived, and her
presence at once had the effect of rousing my tipsiness to a violent
Page 114
outbreak; for she seemed astonished at my rowdy and unseemly behaviour,
and made several remarks upon it intended for jokes, whereupon I scoffed
at her in the coarsest manner, so that she immediately left the house in high
dudgeon. I had still sense enough to be conscious of Minna’s astonished
laughter at my outrageous conduct. As soon as she realised, however, that
my condition was such as to render my removal impossible without great
commotion, she rapidly formed a resolution which must indeed have cost
her an effort, though it was carried out with the utmost calmness and good-
humour. She did all she could for me, and procured me the necessary relief,
and when I sank into a heavy slumber, unhesitatingly resigned her own bed
to my use. There I slept until awakened by the wonderful grey of dawn. On
recognising where I was, I at once realised and grew ever more convinced
of the fact that this morning’s sunrise marked the starting-point of an
infinitely momentous period of my life. The demon of care had at last
entered into my existence.
Without any light-hearted jests, without gaiety or joking of any
description, we breakfasted quietly and decorously together, and at an hour
when, in view of the compromising circumstances of the previous evening,
we could set out without attracting undue notice, I set off with Minna for a
long walk beyond the city gates. Then we parted, and from that day forward
freely and openly gratified our desires as an acknowledged pair of lovers.
The peculiar direction which my musical activities had gradually taken
continued to receive ever fresh impetus, not only from the successes, but
also from the disasters which about this time befell my efforts. I produced
the overture to my Feen with very satisfactory results at a concert given by
the Logengesellschaft, and thereby earned considerable applause. On the
other hand, news came from Leipzig confirming the shabby action of the
directors of the theatre in that place with regard to the promised
presentation of this opera. But, happily for me, I had begun the music for
my Liebesverbot, an occupation which so absorbed my thoughts that I lost
all interest in the earlier work, and abstained with proud indifference from
all further effort to secure its performance in Leipzig. The success of its
overture alone amply repaid me for the composition of my first opera.
Meanwhile, in spite of numerous other distractions, I found time, during
the brief six months of this theatrical season in Magdeburg, to complete a
large portion of my new opera, besides doing other work. I ventured to
and made several remarks upon it intended for jokes, whereupon I scoffed
at her in the coarsest manner, so that she immediately left the house in high
dudgeon. I had still sense enough to be conscious of Minna’s astonished
laughter at my outrageous conduct. As soon as she realised, however, that
my condition was such as to render my removal impossible without great
commotion, she rapidly formed a resolution which must indeed have cost
her an effort, though it was carried out with the utmost calmness and good-
humour. She did all she could for me, and procured me the necessary relief,
and when I sank into a heavy slumber, unhesitatingly resigned her own bed
to my use. There I slept until awakened by the wonderful grey of dawn. On
recognising where I was, I at once realised and grew ever more convinced
of the fact that this morning’s sunrise marked the starting-point of an
infinitely momentous period of my life. The demon of care had at last
entered into my existence.
Without any light-hearted jests, without gaiety or joking of any
description, we breakfasted quietly and decorously together, and at an hour
when, in view of the compromising circumstances of the previous evening,
we could set out without attracting undue notice, I set off with Minna for a
long walk beyond the city gates. Then we parted, and from that day forward
freely and openly gratified our desires as an acknowledged pair of lovers.
The peculiar direction which my musical activities had gradually taken
continued to receive ever fresh impetus, not only from the successes, but
also from the disasters which about this time befell my efforts. I produced
the overture to my Feen with very satisfactory results at a concert given by
the Logengesellschaft, and thereby earned considerable applause. On the
other hand, news came from Leipzig confirming the shabby action of the
directors of the theatre in that place with regard to the promised
presentation of this opera. But, happily for me, I had begun the music for
my Liebesverbot, an occupation which so absorbed my thoughts that I lost
all interest in the earlier work, and abstained with proud indifference from
all further effort to secure its performance in Leipzig. The success of its
overture alone amply repaid me for the composition of my first opera.
Meanwhile, in spite of numerous other distractions, I found time, during
the brief six months of this theatrical season in Magdeburg, to complete a
large portion of my new opera, besides doing other work. I ventured to
Page 115
introduce two duets from it at a concert given in the theatre, and their
reception encouraged me to proceed hopefully with the rest of the opera.
During the second half of this season my friend Apel came to sun himself
enthusiastically in the splendour of my musical directorship. He had written
a drama, Columbus, which I recommended to our management for
production. This was a peculiarly easy favour to win, as Apel volunteered to
have a new scene, representing the Alhambra, painted at his own expense.
Besides this, he proposed to effect many welcome improvements in the
condition of the actors taking part in his play; for, owing to the continued
preference displayed by the directress for Kneisel, the bass, they had all
suffered very much from uncertainty about their wages. The piece itself
appeared to me to contain much that was good. It described the difficulties
and struggles of the great navigator before he set sail on his first voyage of
discovery. The drama ended with the momentous departure of his ships
from the harbour of Palos, an episode whose results are known to all the
world. At my desire Apel submitted his play to my uncle Adolph, and even
in his critical opinion it was remarkable for its lively and characteristic
popular scenes. On the other hand, a love romance, which he had woven
into the plot, struck me as unnecessary and dull. In addition to a brief
chorus for some Moors who were expelled from Granada, to be sung on
their departure from the familiar home country, and a short orchestral piece
by way of conclusion, I also dashed off an overture for my friend’s play. I
sketched out the complete draft of this one evening at Minna’s house, while
Apel was left free to talk to her as much and as loudly as he liked. The
effect this composition was calculated to produce rested on a fundamental
idea which was quite simple, yet startling in its development. Unfortunately
I worked it out rather hurriedly. In not very carefully chosen phrasing the
orchestra was to represent the ocean, and, as far as might be, the ship upon
it. A forcible, pathetically yearning and aspiring theme was the only
comprehensible idea amid the swirl of enveloping sound. When the whole
had been repeated, there was a sudden jump to a different theme in extreme
pianissimo, accompanied by the swelling vibrations of the first violins,
which was intended to represent a Fata Morgana. I had secured three pairs
of trumpets in different keys, in order to produce this exquisite, gradually
dawning and seductive theme with the utmost niceties of shade and variety
of modulation. This was intended to represent the land of desire towards
which the hero’s eyes are turned, and whose shores seem continually to rise
reception encouraged me to proceed hopefully with the rest of the opera.
During the second half of this season my friend Apel came to sun himself
enthusiastically in the splendour of my musical directorship. He had written
a drama, Columbus, which I recommended to our management for
production. This was a peculiarly easy favour to win, as Apel volunteered to
have a new scene, representing the Alhambra, painted at his own expense.
Besides this, he proposed to effect many welcome improvements in the
condition of the actors taking part in his play; for, owing to the continued
preference displayed by the directress for Kneisel, the bass, they had all
suffered very much from uncertainty about their wages. The piece itself
appeared to me to contain much that was good. It described the difficulties
and struggles of the great navigator before he set sail on his first voyage of
discovery. The drama ended with the momentous departure of his ships
from the harbour of Palos, an episode whose results are known to all the
world. At my desire Apel submitted his play to my uncle Adolph, and even
in his critical opinion it was remarkable for its lively and characteristic
popular scenes. On the other hand, a love romance, which he had woven
into the plot, struck me as unnecessary and dull. In addition to a brief
chorus for some Moors who were expelled from Granada, to be sung on
their departure from the familiar home country, and a short orchestral piece
by way of conclusion, I also dashed off an overture for my friend’s play. I
sketched out the complete draft of this one evening at Minna’s house, while
Apel was left free to talk to her as much and as loudly as he liked. The
effect this composition was calculated to produce rested on a fundamental
idea which was quite simple, yet startling in its development. Unfortunately
I worked it out rather hurriedly. In not very carefully chosen phrasing the
orchestra was to represent the ocean, and, as far as might be, the ship upon
it. A forcible, pathetically yearning and aspiring theme was the only
comprehensible idea amid the swirl of enveloping sound. When the whole
had been repeated, there was a sudden jump to a different theme in extreme
pianissimo, accompanied by the swelling vibrations of the first violins,
which was intended to represent a Fata Morgana. I had secured three pairs
of trumpets in different keys, in order to produce this exquisite, gradually
dawning and seductive theme with the utmost niceties of shade and variety
of modulation. This was intended to represent the land of desire towards
which the hero’s eyes are turned, and whose shores seem continually to rise
Page 116
before him only to sink elusively beneath the waves, until at last they soar
in very deed above the western horizon, the crown of all his toil and search,
and stand clearly and unmistakably revealed to all the sailors, a vast
continent of the future. My six trumpets were now to combine in one key, in
order that the theme assigned to them might re-echo in glorious jubilation.
Familiar as I was with the excellence of the Prussian regimental trumpeters,
I could rely upon a startling effect, especially in this concluding passage.
My overture astonished every one, and was tumultuously applauded. The
play itself, however, was acted without dignity. A conceited comedian,
named Ludwig Meyer, completely ruined the title part, for which he
excused himself on the ground that, having to act as stage manager also, he
had been unable to commit his lines to memory. Nevertheless, he managed
to enrich his wardrobe with several splendid costumes at Apel’s expense,
wearing them, as Columbus, one after the other. At all events, Apel had
lived to see a play of his own actually performed, and although this was
never repeated, yet it afforded me an opportunity of increasing my personal
popularity with the people of Magdeburg, as the overture was several times
repeated at concerts by special request.
But the chief event of this theatrical season occurred towards its close. I
induced Mme. Schroder-Devrient, who was staying in Leipzig, to come to
us for a few special performances, when, on two occasions, I had the great
satisfaction and stimulating experience of myself conducting the operas in
which she sang, and thus entering into immediate artistic collaboration with
her. She appeared as Desdemona and Romeo. In the latter role particularly
she surpassed herself, and kindled a fresh flame in my breast. This visit
brought us also into closer personal contact. So kindly disposed and
sympathetic did she show herself towards me, that she even volunteered to
lend me her services at a concert which I proposed to give for my own
benefit, although this would necessitate her returning after a brief absence.
Under circumstances so auspicious I could only expect the best possible
results from my concert, and in my situation at that time its proceeds were a
matter of vital importance to me. My scanty salary from the Magdeburg
opera company had become altogether illusory, being paid only in small
and irregular instalments, so that I could see but one way of meeting my
daily expenses. These included frequent entertainment of a large circle of
friends, consisting of singers and players, and the situation had become
unpleasantly accentuated by no small number of debts. True, I did not know
in very deed above the western horizon, the crown of all his toil and search,
and stand clearly and unmistakably revealed to all the sailors, a vast
continent of the future. My six trumpets were now to combine in one key, in
order that the theme assigned to them might re-echo in glorious jubilation.
Familiar as I was with the excellence of the Prussian regimental trumpeters,
I could rely upon a startling effect, especially in this concluding passage.
My overture astonished every one, and was tumultuously applauded. The
play itself, however, was acted without dignity. A conceited comedian,
named Ludwig Meyer, completely ruined the title part, for which he
excused himself on the ground that, having to act as stage manager also, he
had been unable to commit his lines to memory. Nevertheless, he managed
to enrich his wardrobe with several splendid costumes at Apel’s expense,
wearing them, as Columbus, one after the other. At all events, Apel had
lived to see a play of his own actually performed, and although this was
never repeated, yet it afforded me an opportunity of increasing my personal
popularity with the people of Magdeburg, as the overture was several times
repeated at concerts by special request.
But the chief event of this theatrical season occurred towards its close. I
induced Mme. Schroder-Devrient, who was staying in Leipzig, to come to
us for a few special performances, when, on two occasions, I had the great
satisfaction and stimulating experience of myself conducting the operas in
which she sang, and thus entering into immediate artistic collaboration with
her. She appeared as Desdemona and Romeo. In the latter role particularly
she surpassed herself, and kindled a fresh flame in my breast. This visit
brought us also into closer personal contact. So kindly disposed and
sympathetic did she show herself towards me, that she even volunteered to
lend me her services at a concert which I proposed to give for my own
benefit, although this would necessitate her returning after a brief absence.
Under circumstances so auspicious I could only expect the best possible
results from my concert, and in my situation at that time its proceeds were a
matter of vital importance to me. My scanty salary from the Magdeburg
opera company had become altogether illusory, being paid only in small
and irregular instalments, so that I could see but one way of meeting my
daily expenses. These included frequent entertainment of a large circle of
friends, consisting of singers and players, and the situation had become
unpleasantly accentuated by no small number of debts. True, I did not know
Page 117
their exact amount; but reckoned that I could at least form an advantageous,
if indefinite, estimate of the sum to be realized by my concert, whereby the
two unknown quantities might balance each other. I therefore consoled my
creditors with the tale of these fabulous receipts, which were to pay them all
in full the day after the concert. I even went so far as to invite them to come
and be paid at the hotel to which I had moved at the close of the season.
And, indeed, there was nothing unreasonable in my counting on the
highest imaginable receipts, when supported by so great and popular a
singer, who, moreover, was returning to Magdeburg on purpose for the
event. I consequently acted with reckless prodigality as regards cost,
launching out into all manner of musical extravagance, such as engaging an
excellent and much larger orchestra, and arranging many rehearsals.
Unfortunately for me, however, nobody would believe that such a famous
actress, whose time was so precious, would really return again to please a
little Magdeburg conductor. My pompous announcement of her appearance
was almost universally regarded as a deceitful manœuvre, and people took
offence at the high prices charged for seats. The result was that the hall was
only very scantily filled, a fact which particularly grieved me on account of
my generous patroness. Her promise I had never doubted. Punctually on the
day appointed she reappeared to support me, and now had the painful and
unaccustomed experience of performing before a small audience.
Fortunately, she treated the matter with great good-humour (which, I
learned later, was prompted by other motives, not personally concerning
me). Among several pieces she sang Beethoven’s Adelaïde most exquisitely,
wherein, to my own astonishment, I accompanied her on the piano. But,
alas! another and more unexpected mishap befell my concert, through our
unfortunate selection of pieces. Owing to the excessive reverberation of the
saloon in the Hotel ‘The City of London,’ the noise was unbearable. My
Columbus Overture, with its six trumpets, had early in the evening filled the
audience with terror; and now, at the end, came Beethoven’s Schlacht bei
Vittoria, for which, in enthusiastic expectation of limitless receipts, I had
provided every imaginable orchestral luxury. The firing of cannon and
musketry was organised with the utmost elaboration, on both the French
and English sides, by means of specially constructed and costly apparatus;
while trumpets and bugles had been doubled and trebled. Then began a
battle, such as has seldom been more cruelly fought in a concert-room. The
orchestra flung itself, so to speak, upon the scanty audience with such an
if indefinite, estimate of the sum to be realized by my concert, whereby the
two unknown quantities might balance each other. I therefore consoled my
creditors with the tale of these fabulous receipts, which were to pay them all
in full the day after the concert. I even went so far as to invite them to come
and be paid at the hotel to which I had moved at the close of the season.
And, indeed, there was nothing unreasonable in my counting on the
highest imaginable receipts, when supported by so great and popular a
singer, who, moreover, was returning to Magdeburg on purpose for the
event. I consequently acted with reckless prodigality as regards cost,
launching out into all manner of musical extravagance, such as engaging an
excellent and much larger orchestra, and arranging many rehearsals.
Unfortunately for me, however, nobody would believe that such a famous
actress, whose time was so precious, would really return again to please a
little Magdeburg conductor. My pompous announcement of her appearance
was almost universally regarded as a deceitful manœuvre, and people took
offence at the high prices charged for seats. The result was that the hall was
only very scantily filled, a fact which particularly grieved me on account of
my generous patroness. Her promise I had never doubted. Punctually on the
day appointed she reappeared to support me, and now had the painful and
unaccustomed experience of performing before a small audience.
Fortunately, she treated the matter with great good-humour (which, I
learned later, was prompted by other motives, not personally concerning
me). Among several pieces she sang Beethoven’s Adelaïde most exquisitely,
wherein, to my own astonishment, I accompanied her on the piano. But,
alas! another and more unexpected mishap befell my concert, through our
unfortunate selection of pieces. Owing to the excessive reverberation of the
saloon in the Hotel ‘The City of London,’ the noise was unbearable. My
Columbus Overture, with its six trumpets, had early in the evening filled the
audience with terror; and now, at the end, came Beethoven’s Schlacht bei
Vittoria, for which, in enthusiastic expectation of limitless receipts, I had
provided every imaginable orchestral luxury. The firing of cannon and
musketry was organised with the utmost elaboration, on both the French
and English sides, by means of specially constructed and costly apparatus;
while trumpets and bugles had been doubled and trebled. Then began a
battle, such as has seldom been more cruelly fought in a concert-room. The
orchestra flung itself, so to speak, upon the scanty audience with such an
Page 118
overwhelming superiority of numbers that the latter speedily gave up all
thought of resistance and literally took to flight. Mme. Schroder-Devrient
had kindly taken a front seat, that she might hear the concert to an end.
Much as she may have been inured to terrors of this kind, this was more
than she could stand, even out of friendship for me. When, therefore, the
English made a fresh desperate assault upon the French position, she took to
flight, almost wringing her hands. Her action became the signal for a panic-
stricken stampede. Every one rushed out; and Wellington’s victory was
finally celebrated in a confidential outburst between myself and the
orchestra alone. Thus ended this wonderful musical festival. Schroder-
Devrient at once departed, deeply regretting the ill-success of her well-
meant effort, and kindly left me to my fate. After seeking comfort in the
arms of my sorrowing sweetheart, and attempting to nerve myself for the
morrow’s battle, which did not seem likely to end in a victorious symphony,
I returned next morning to the hotel. I found I could only reach my rooms
by running the gauntlet between long rows of men and women in double
file, who had all been specially invited thither for the settlement of their
respective affairs. Reserving the right to select individuals from among my
visitors for separate interview, I first of all led in the second trumpeter of
the orchestra, whose duty it had been to look after the cash and the music.
From his account I learned that, owing to the high fees which, in my
generous enthusiasm, I had promised to the orchestra, a few more shillings
and sixpences would still have to come out of my own pocket to meet these
charges alone. When this was settled, the position of affairs was plain. The
next person I invited to come in was Mme. Gottschalk, a trustworthy
Jewess, with whom I wanted to come to some arrangement respecting the
present crisis. She perceived at once that more than ordinary help was
required in this case, but did not doubt that I should be able to obtain it from
my opulent connections in Leipzig. She undertook, therefore, to appease the
other creditors with tranquillising assurances, and railed, or pretended to
rail, against their indecent conduct with great vigour. Thus at last we
succeeded, though not without some difficulty, in making the corridor
outside my door once more passable.
The theatrical season was now over, our company on the point of
dissolution, and I myself free from my appointment. But meanwhile the
unhappy director of our theatre had passed from a state of chronic to one of
acute bankruptcy. He paid with paper money, that is to say, with whole
thought of resistance and literally took to flight. Mme. Schroder-Devrient
had kindly taken a front seat, that she might hear the concert to an end.
Much as she may have been inured to terrors of this kind, this was more
than she could stand, even out of friendship for me. When, therefore, the
English made a fresh desperate assault upon the French position, she took to
flight, almost wringing her hands. Her action became the signal for a panic-
stricken stampede. Every one rushed out; and Wellington’s victory was
finally celebrated in a confidential outburst between myself and the
orchestra alone. Thus ended this wonderful musical festival. Schroder-
Devrient at once departed, deeply regretting the ill-success of her well-
meant effort, and kindly left me to my fate. After seeking comfort in the
arms of my sorrowing sweetheart, and attempting to nerve myself for the
morrow’s battle, which did not seem likely to end in a victorious symphony,
I returned next morning to the hotel. I found I could only reach my rooms
by running the gauntlet between long rows of men and women in double
file, who had all been specially invited thither for the settlement of their
respective affairs. Reserving the right to select individuals from among my
visitors for separate interview, I first of all led in the second trumpeter of
the orchestra, whose duty it had been to look after the cash and the music.
From his account I learned that, owing to the high fees which, in my
generous enthusiasm, I had promised to the orchestra, a few more shillings
and sixpences would still have to come out of my own pocket to meet these
charges alone. When this was settled, the position of affairs was plain. The
next person I invited to come in was Mme. Gottschalk, a trustworthy
Jewess, with whom I wanted to come to some arrangement respecting the
present crisis. She perceived at once that more than ordinary help was
required in this case, but did not doubt that I should be able to obtain it from
my opulent connections in Leipzig. She undertook, therefore, to appease the
other creditors with tranquillising assurances, and railed, or pretended to
rail, against their indecent conduct with great vigour. Thus at last we
succeeded, though not without some difficulty, in making the corridor
outside my door once more passable.
The theatrical season was now over, our company on the point of
dissolution, and I myself free from my appointment. But meanwhile the
unhappy director of our theatre had passed from a state of chronic to one of
acute bankruptcy. He paid with paper money, that is to say, with whole
Page 119
sheets of box-tickets for performances which he guaranteed should take
place. By dint of great craft Minna managed to extract some profit even
from these singular treasury-bonds. She was living at this time most
frugally and economically. Moreover, as the dramatic company still
continued its efforts on behalf of its members—only the opera troupe
having been dissolved—she remained at the theatre. Thus, when I started
out on my compulsory return to Leipzig, she saw me off with hearty good-
wishes for our speedy reunion, promising to spend the next holidays in
visiting her parents in Dresden, on which occasion she hoped also to look
me up in Leipzig.
Thus it came about that early in May I once more went home to my own
folk, in order that after this abortive first attempt at civic independence, I
might finally lift the load of debt with which my efforts in Magdeburg had
burdened me. An intelligent brown poodle faithfully accompanied me, and
was entrusted to my family for food and entertainment as the only visible
property I had acquired. Nevertheless, my mother and Rosalie succeeded in
founding good hopes for my future career upon the bare fact of my being
able to conduct an orchestra. To me, on the other hand, the thought of
returning once more to my former life with my family was very
discomfiting. My relation to Minna in particular spurred me on to resume
my interrupted career as speedily as possible. The great change which had
come over me in this respect was more apparent than ever when Minna
spent a few days with me in Leipzig on her way home. Her familiar and
genial presence proclaimed that my days of parental dependence were past
and gone. We discussed the renewal of my Magdeburg engagement, and I
promised her an early visit in Dresden. I obtained permission from my
mother and sister to invite her one evening to tea, and in this way I
introduced her to my family. Rosalie saw at once how matters stood with
me, but made no further use of the discovery than to tease me about being
in love. To her the affair did not appear dangerous; but to me things wore a
very different aspect, for this love-lorn attachment was entirely in keeping
with my independent spirit, and my ambition to win myself a place in the
world of art.
My distaste for Leipzig itself was furthermore strengthened by a change
which occurred there at this time in the realm of music. At the very time
that I, in Magdeburg, was attempting to make my reputation as a musical
conductor by thoughtless submission to the frivolous taste of the day,
place. By dint of great craft Minna managed to extract some profit even
from these singular treasury-bonds. She was living at this time most
frugally and economically. Moreover, as the dramatic company still
continued its efforts on behalf of its members—only the opera troupe
having been dissolved—she remained at the theatre. Thus, when I started
out on my compulsory return to Leipzig, she saw me off with hearty good-
wishes for our speedy reunion, promising to spend the next holidays in
visiting her parents in Dresden, on which occasion she hoped also to look
me up in Leipzig.
Thus it came about that early in May I once more went home to my own
folk, in order that after this abortive first attempt at civic independence, I
might finally lift the load of debt with which my efforts in Magdeburg had
burdened me. An intelligent brown poodle faithfully accompanied me, and
was entrusted to my family for food and entertainment as the only visible
property I had acquired. Nevertheless, my mother and Rosalie succeeded in
founding good hopes for my future career upon the bare fact of my being
able to conduct an orchestra. To me, on the other hand, the thought of
returning once more to my former life with my family was very
discomfiting. My relation to Minna in particular spurred me on to resume
my interrupted career as speedily as possible. The great change which had
come over me in this respect was more apparent than ever when Minna
spent a few days with me in Leipzig on her way home. Her familiar and
genial presence proclaimed that my days of parental dependence were past
and gone. We discussed the renewal of my Magdeburg engagement, and I
promised her an early visit in Dresden. I obtained permission from my
mother and sister to invite her one evening to tea, and in this way I
introduced her to my family. Rosalie saw at once how matters stood with
me, but made no further use of the discovery than to tease me about being
in love. To her the affair did not appear dangerous; but to me things wore a
very different aspect, for this love-lorn attachment was entirely in keeping
with my independent spirit, and my ambition to win myself a place in the
world of art.
My distaste for Leipzig itself was furthermore strengthened by a change
which occurred there at this time in the realm of music. At the very time
that I, in Magdeburg, was attempting to make my reputation as a musical
conductor by thoughtless submission to the frivolous taste of the day,
Page 120
Mendelssohn-Bartholdy was conducting the Gewandhaus concerts, and
inaugurating a momentous epoch for himself and the musical taste of
Leipzig. His influence had put an end to the simple ingenuousness with
which the Leipzig public had hitherto judged the productions of its sociable
subscription concerts. Through the influence of my good old friend
Pohlenz, who was not yet altogether laid on the shelf, I managed to produce
my Columbus Overture at a benefit concert given by the favourite young
singer, Livia Gerhart. But, to my amazement, I found that the taste of the
musical public in Leipzig had been given a different bent, which not even
my rapturously applauded overture, with its brilliant combination of six
trumpets, could influence. This experience deepened my dislike of
everything approaching a classical tone, in which sentiment I found myself
in complete accord with honest Pohlenz, who sighed good-naturedly over
the downfall of the good old times.
Arrangements for a musical festival at Dessau, under Friedrich
Schneider’s conductorship, offered me a welcome chance of quitting
Leipzig. For this journey, which could be performed on foot in seven hours,
I had to procure a passport for eight days. This document was destined to
play an important part in my life for many years to come; for on several
occasions and in various European countries it was the only paper I
possessed to prove my identity. In fact, owing to my evasion of military
duty in Saxony, I never again succeeded in obtaining a regular pass until I
was appointed musical conductor in Dresden. I derived very little artistic
pleasure or benefit of any kind from this occasion; on the contrary, it gave a
fresh impetus to my hatred of the classical. I heard Beethoven’s Symphony
in C minor conducted by a man whose physiognomy, resembling that of a
drunken satyr, filled me with unconquerable disgust. In spite of an
interminable row of contrabassi, with which a conductor usually coquettes
at musical festivals, his performance was so expressionless and inane that I
turned away in disgust as from an alarming and repulsive problem, and
desisted from all attempts to explain the impassable gulf which, as I again
perceived, yawned between my own vivid and imaginative conception of
this work and the only living presentations of it which I had ever heard. But
for the present my tormented spirits were cheered and calmed by hearing
the classical Schneider’s oratorio Absalom rendered as an absolute
burlesque.
inaugurating a momentous epoch for himself and the musical taste of
Leipzig. His influence had put an end to the simple ingenuousness with
which the Leipzig public had hitherto judged the productions of its sociable
subscription concerts. Through the influence of my good old friend
Pohlenz, who was not yet altogether laid on the shelf, I managed to produce
my Columbus Overture at a benefit concert given by the favourite young
singer, Livia Gerhart. But, to my amazement, I found that the taste of the
musical public in Leipzig had been given a different bent, which not even
my rapturously applauded overture, with its brilliant combination of six
trumpets, could influence. This experience deepened my dislike of
everything approaching a classical tone, in which sentiment I found myself
in complete accord with honest Pohlenz, who sighed good-naturedly over
the downfall of the good old times.
Arrangements for a musical festival at Dessau, under Friedrich
Schneider’s conductorship, offered me a welcome chance of quitting
Leipzig. For this journey, which could be performed on foot in seven hours,
I had to procure a passport for eight days. This document was destined to
play an important part in my life for many years to come; for on several
occasions and in various European countries it was the only paper I
possessed to prove my identity. In fact, owing to my evasion of military
duty in Saxony, I never again succeeded in obtaining a regular pass until I
was appointed musical conductor in Dresden. I derived very little artistic
pleasure or benefit of any kind from this occasion; on the contrary, it gave a
fresh impetus to my hatred of the classical. I heard Beethoven’s Symphony
in C minor conducted by a man whose physiognomy, resembling that of a
drunken satyr, filled me with unconquerable disgust. In spite of an
interminable row of contrabassi, with which a conductor usually coquettes
at musical festivals, his performance was so expressionless and inane that I
turned away in disgust as from an alarming and repulsive problem, and
desisted from all attempts to explain the impassable gulf which, as I again
perceived, yawned between my own vivid and imaginative conception of
this work and the only living presentations of it which I had ever heard. But
for the present my tormented spirits were cheered and calmed by hearing
the classical Schneider’s oratorio Absalom rendered as an absolute
burlesque.
Page 121
It was in Dessau that Minna had made her first debut on the stage, and
while there I heard her spoken of by frivolous young men in the tone usual
in such circles when discussing young and beautiful actresses. My
eagerness in contradicting this chatter and confounding the scandalmongers
revealed to me more clearly than ever the strength of the passion which
drew me to her.
I therefore returned to Leipzig without calling on my relatives, and there
procured means for an immediate journey to Dresden. On the way (the
journey was still performed by express coach) I met Minna, accompanied
by one of her sisters, already on the way back to Magdeburg. Promptly
procuring a posting ticket for the return journey to Leipzig, I actually set off
thither with my dear girl; but by the time we reached the next station I had
succeeded in persuading her to turn back with me to Dresden. By this time
the mail-coach was far ahead of us, and we had to travel by special post-
chaise. This lively bustling to and fro seemed to astonish the two girls, and
put them into high spirits. The extravagance of my conduct had evidently
roused them to the expectation of adventures, and it now behoved me to
fulfil this expectation. Procuring from a Dresden acquaintance the
necessary cash, I conducted my two lady friends through the Saxon Alps,
where we spent several right merry days of innocent and youthful gaiety.
Only once was this disturbed by a passing fit of jealousy on my part, for
which, indeed, there was no occasion, but which fed itself in my heart on a
nervous apprehension of the future, and upon the experience I had already
gained of womenkind. Yet, despite this blot, our excursion still lingers in
my memory as the sweetest and almost sole remembrance of unalloyed
happiness in the whole of my life as a young man. One evening in particular
stands out in bright relief, during which we sat together almost all night at
the watering-place of Schandau in glorious summer weather. Indeed, my
subsequent long and anxious connection with Minna, interwoven as it was
with the most painful and bitter vicissitudes, has often appeared to me as a
persistently prolonged expiation of the brief and harmless enjoyment of
those few days.
After accompanying Minna to Leipzig, whence she continued her
journey to Magdeburg, I presented myself to my family, but told them
nothing of my Dresden excursion. I now braced my energies, as though
under the stern compulsion of a strange and deep sense of duty, to the task
of making such arrangements as would speedily restore me to my dear
while there I heard her spoken of by frivolous young men in the tone usual
in such circles when discussing young and beautiful actresses. My
eagerness in contradicting this chatter and confounding the scandalmongers
revealed to me more clearly than ever the strength of the passion which
drew me to her.
I therefore returned to Leipzig without calling on my relatives, and there
procured means for an immediate journey to Dresden. On the way (the
journey was still performed by express coach) I met Minna, accompanied
by one of her sisters, already on the way back to Magdeburg. Promptly
procuring a posting ticket for the return journey to Leipzig, I actually set off
thither with my dear girl; but by the time we reached the next station I had
succeeded in persuading her to turn back with me to Dresden. By this time
the mail-coach was far ahead of us, and we had to travel by special post-
chaise. This lively bustling to and fro seemed to astonish the two girls, and
put them into high spirits. The extravagance of my conduct had evidently
roused them to the expectation of adventures, and it now behoved me to
fulfil this expectation. Procuring from a Dresden acquaintance the
necessary cash, I conducted my two lady friends through the Saxon Alps,
where we spent several right merry days of innocent and youthful gaiety.
Only once was this disturbed by a passing fit of jealousy on my part, for
which, indeed, there was no occasion, but which fed itself in my heart on a
nervous apprehension of the future, and upon the experience I had already
gained of womenkind. Yet, despite this blot, our excursion still lingers in
my memory as the sweetest and almost sole remembrance of unalloyed
happiness in the whole of my life as a young man. One evening in particular
stands out in bright relief, during which we sat together almost all night at
the watering-place of Schandau in glorious summer weather. Indeed, my
subsequent long and anxious connection with Minna, interwoven as it was
with the most painful and bitter vicissitudes, has often appeared to me as a
persistently prolonged expiation of the brief and harmless enjoyment of
those few days.
After accompanying Minna to Leipzig, whence she continued her
journey to Magdeburg, I presented myself to my family, but told them
nothing of my Dresden excursion. I now braced my energies, as though
under the stern compulsion of a strange and deep sense of duty, to the task
of making such arrangements as would speedily restore me to my dear
Page 122
one’s side. To this end a fresh engagement had to be negotiated with
Director Bethmann for the coming winter season. Unable to await the
conclusion of our contract in Leipzig, I availed myself of Laube’s presence
at the baths in Kosen, near Naumburg, to pay him a visit. Laube had only
recently been discharged from the Berlin municipal gaol, after a tormenting
inquisition of nearly a year’s duration. On giving his parole not to leave the
country until the verdict had been given, he had been permitted to retire to
Kosen, from which place he, one evening, paid us a secret visit in Leipzig. I
can still call his woebegone appearance to mind. He seemed hopelessly
resigned, though he spoke cheerfully with regard to all his earlier dreams of
better things; and owing to my own worries at that time about the critical
state of my affairs, this impression still remains one of my saddest and most
painful recollections. While at Kosen I showed him a good many of the
verses for my Liebesverbot, and although he spoke coldly of my
presumption in wishing to write my own libretto, I was slightly encouraged
by his appreciation of my work.
Meanwhile I impatiently awaited letters from Magdeburg. Not that I had
any doubt as to the renewal of my engagement; on the contrary, I had every
reason to regard myself as a good acquisition for Bethmann; but I felt as
though nothing which tended to bring me nearer to Minna could move fast
enough. As soon as I received the necessary tidings, I hurried away to make
all needful arrangements on the spot for ensuring a magnificent success in
the coming Magdeburg operatic season.
Through the tireless munificence of the King of Prussia fresh and final
assistance had been granted to our perennially bankrupt theatrical director.
His Majesty had assigned a not inconsiderable sum to a committee
consisting of substantial Magdeburg citizens, as a subsidy to be expended
on the theatre under Bethmann’s management. What this meant, and the
respect with which I thereupon regarded the artistic conditions of
Magdeburg, may be best imagined if one remembers the neglected and
forlorn surroundings amid which such provincial theatres usually drag out
their lives. I offered at once to undertake a long journey in search of good
operatic singers. I said I would find the means for this at my own risk, and
the only guarantee I demanded from the management for eventual
reimbursement was that they should assign me the proceeds of a future
benefit performance. This offer was gladly accepted, and in pompous tones
the director furnished me with the necessary powers, and moreover gave me
Director Bethmann for the coming winter season. Unable to await the
conclusion of our contract in Leipzig, I availed myself of Laube’s presence
at the baths in Kosen, near Naumburg, to pay him a visit. Laube had only
recently been discharged from the Berlin municipal gaol, after a tormenting
inquisition of nearly a year’s duration. On giving his parole not to leave the
country until the verdict had been given, he had been permitted to retire to
Kosen, from which place he, one evening, paid us a secret visit in Leipzig. I
can still call his woebegone appearance to mind. He seemed hopelessly
resigned, though he spoke cheerfully with regard to all his earlier dreams of
better things; and owing to my own worries at that time about the critical
state of my affairs, this impression still remains one of my saddest and most
painful recollections. While at Kosen I showed him a good many of the
verses for my Liebesverbot, and although he spoke coldly of my
presumption in wishing to write my own libretto, I was slightly encouraged
by his appreciation of my work.
Meanwhile I impatiently awaited letters from Magdeburg. Not that I had
any doubt as to the renewal of my engagement; on the contrary, I had every
reason to regard myself as a good acquisition for Bethmann; but I felt as
though nothing which tended to bring me nearer to Minna could move fast
enough. As soon as I received the necessary tidings, I hurried away to make
all needful arrangements on the spot for ensuring a magnificent success in
the coming Magdeburg operatic season.
Through the tireless munificence of the King of Prussia fresh and final
assistance had been granted to our perennially bankrupt theatrical director.
His Majesty had assigned a not inconsiderable sum to a committee
consisting of substantial Magdeburg citizens, as a subsidy to be expended
on the theatre under Bethmann’s management. What this meant, and the
respect with which I thereupon regarded the artistic conditions of
Magdeburg, may be best imagined if one remembers the neglected and
forlorn surroundings amid which such provincial theatres usually drag out
their lives. I offered at once to undertake a long journey in search of good
operatic singers. I said I would find the means for this at my own risk, and
the only guarantee I demanded from the management for eventual
reimbursement was that they should assign me the proceeds of a future
benefit performance. This offer was gladly accepted, and in pompous tones
the director furnished me with the necessary powers, and moreover gave me
Page 123
his parting blessing. During this brief interval I lived once more in intimate
communion with Minna—who now had her mother with her—and then
took fresh leave of her for my venturesome enterprise.
But when I got to Leipzig I found it by no means easy to procure the
funds, so confidently counted on when in Magdeburg, for the expenses of
my projected journey. The glamour of the royal protection of Prussia for our
theatrical undertaking, which I portrayed in the liveliest colours to my good
brother-in-law Brockhaus, quite failed to dazzle him, and it was at the cost
of great pains and humiliation that I finally got my ship of discovery under
weigh.
I was naturally drawn first of all to my old wonderland of Bohemia.
There I merely touched at Prague and, without visiting my lovely lady
friends, I hurried forward so that I might first sample the opera company
then playing for the season at Karlsbad. Impatient to discover as many
talents as I could as soon as possible, so as not to exhaust my funds to no
purpose, I attended a performance of La Dame Blanche, sincerely hoping to
find the whole performance first class. But not until much later did I fully
realise how wretched was the quality of all these singers. I selected one of
them, a bass named Graf, who was singing Gaveston. When in due course
he made his debut at Magdeburg, he provoked so much well-founded
dissatisfaction, that I could not find a word to say in reply to the mockery
which this acquisition brought upon me.
But the small success with which the real object of my tour was attended
was counterbalanced by the pleasantness of the journey itself. The trip
through Eger, over the Fichtel mountains, and the entry into Bayreuth,
gloriously illuminated by the setting sun, have remained happy memories to
this day.
My next goal was Nuremberg, where my sister Clara and her husband
were acting, and from whom I might reckon on sound information as to the
object of my search. It was particularly nice to be hospitably received in my
sister’s house, where I hoped to revive my somewhat exhausted means of
travel. In this hope I reckoned chiefly upon the sale of a snuff-box presented
to me by a friend, which I had secret reasons to suppose was made of
platinum. To this I could add a gold signet-ring, given me by my friend
Apel for composing the overture to his Columbus. The value of the snuff-
box unfortunately proved to be entirely imaginary; but by pawning these
communion with Minna—who now had her mother with her—and then
took fresh leave of her for my venturesome enterprise.
But when I got to Leipzig I found it by no means easy to procure the
funds, so confidently counted on when in Magdeburg, for the expenses of
my projected journey. The glamour of the royal protection of Prussia for our
theatrical undertaking, which I portrayed in the liveliest colours to my good
brother-in-law Brockhaus, quite failed to dazzle him, and it was at the cost
of great pains and humiliation that I finally got my ship of discovery under
weigh.
I was naturally drawn first of all to my old wonderland of Bohemia.
There I merely touched at Prague and, without visiting my lovely lady
friends, I hurried forward so that I might first sample the opera company
then playing for the season at Karlsbad. Impatient to discover as many
talents as I could as soon as possible, so as not to exhaust my funds to no
purpose, I attended a performance of La Dame Blanche, sincerely hoping to
find the whole performance first class. But not until much later did I fully
realise how wretched was the quality of all these singers. I selected one of
them, a bass named Graf, who was singing Gaveston. When in due course
he made his debut at Magdeburg, he provoked so much well-founded
dissatisfaction, that I could not find a word to say in reply to the mockery
which this acquisition brought upon me.
But the small success with which the real object of my tour was attended
was counterbalanced by the pleasantness of the journey itself. The trip
through Eger, over the Fichtel mountains, and the entry into Bayreuth,
gloriously illuminated by the setting sun, have remained happy memories to
this day.
My next goal was Nuremberg, where my sister Clara and her husband
were acting, and from whom I might reckon on sound information as to the
object of my search. It was particularly nice to be hospitably received in my
sister’s house, where I hoped to revive my somewhat exhausted means of
travel. In this hope I reckoned chiefly upon the sale of a snuff-box presented
to me by a friend, which I had secret reasons to suppose was made of
platinum. To this I could add a gold signet-ring, given me by my friend
Apel for composing the overture to his Columbus. The value of the snuff-
box unfortunately proved to be entirely imaginary; but by pawning these
Page 124
two jewels, the only ones I had left, I hoped to provide myself with the bare
necessaries for continuing my journey to Frankfort. It was to this place and
the Rhine district that the information I had gathered led me to direct my
steps. Before leaving I persuaded my sister and brother-in-law to accept
engagements in Magdeburg; but I still lacked a first tenor and a soprano,
whom hitherto I had altogether failed to discover.
My stay in Nuremberg was most agreeably prolonged through a renewed
meeting with Schroder-Devrient, who just at that time was fulfilling a short
engagement in that town. Meeting her again was like seeing the clouds
disperse, which, since our last meeting, had darkened my artistic horizon.
The Nuremberg operatic company had a very limited repertoire. Besides
Fidelio they could produce nothing save Die Schweizerfamilie, a fact about
which this great singer complained, as this was one of her first parts sung in
early youth, for which she was hardly any longer suited, and which, in
addition, she had played ad nauseam. I also looked forward to the
performance of Die Schweizerfamilie with misgivings, and even with
anxiety, for I feared lest this tame opera and the old-fashioned sentimental
part of Emmeline would weaken the great impression the public, as well as
myself, had formed up to that moment of the work of this sublime artist.
Imagine, therefore, how deeply moved and astonished I was, on the evening
of the performance, to find that it was in this very part that I first realised
the truly transcendental genius of this extraordinary woman. That anything
so great as her interpretation of the character of the Swiss maiden could not
be handed down to posterity as a monument for all time can only be looked
upon as one of the most sublime sacrifices demanded by dramatic art, and
as one of its highest manifestations. When, therefore, such phenomena
appear, we cannot hold them in too great reverence, nor look upon them as
too sacred.
Apart from all these new experiences which were to become of so much
value to my whole life and to my artistic development, the impressions I
received at Nuremberg, though they were apparently trivial in their origin,
left such indelible traces on my mind, that they revived within me later on,
though in quite a different and novel form.
My brother-in-law, Wolfram, was a great favourite with the Nuremberg
theatrical world; he was witty and sociable, and as such made himself much
liked in theatrical circles. On this occasion I received singularly delightful
necessaries for continuing my journey to Frankfort. It was to this place and
the Rhine district that the information I had gathered led me to direct my
steps. Before leaving I persuaded my sister and brother-in-law to accept
engagements in Magdeburg; but I still lacked a first tenor and a soprano,
whom hitherto I had altogether failed to discover.
My stay in Nuremberg was most agreeably prolonged through a renewed
meeting with Schroder-Devrient, who just at that time was fulfilling a short
engagement in that town. Meeting her again was like seeing the clouds
disperse, which, since our last meeting, had darkened my artistic horizon.
The Nuremberg operatic company had a very limited repertoire. Besides
Fidelio they could produce nothing save Die Schweizerfamilie, a fact about
which this great singer complained, as this was one of her first parts sung in
early youth, for which she was hardly any longer suited, and which, in
addition, she had played ad nauseam. I also looked forward to the
performance of Die Schweizerfamilie with misgivings, and even with
anxiety, for I feared lest this tame opera and the old-fashioned sentimental
part of Emmeline would weaken the great impression the public, as well as
myself, had formed up to that moment of the work of this sublime artist.
Imagine, therefore, how deeply moved and astonished I was, on the evening
of the performance, to find that it was in this very part that I first realised
the truly transcendental genius of this extraordinary woman. That anything
so great as her interpretation of the character of the Swiss maiden could not
be handed down to posterity as a monument for all time can only be looked
upon as one of the most sublime sacrifices demanded by dramatic art, and
as one of its highest manifestations. When, therefore, such phenomena
appear, we cannot hold them in too great reverence, nor look upon them as
too sacred.
Apart from all these new experiences which were to become of so much
value to my whole life and to my artistic development, the impressions I
received at Nuremberg, though they were apparently trivial in their origin,
left such indelible traces on my mind, that they revived within me later on,
though in quite a different and novel form.
My brother-in-law, Wolfram, was a great favourite with the Nuremberg
theatrical world; he was witty and sociable, and as such made himself much
liked in theatrical circles. On this occasion I received singularly delightful
Page 125
proofs of the spirit of extravagant gaiety manifested on these evenings at
the inn, in which I also took part. A master carpenter, named Lauermann, a
little thick-set man, no longer young, of comical appearance and gifted only
with the roughest dialect, was pointed out to me in one of the inns visited
by our friends as one of those oddities who involuntarily contributed most
to the amusement of the local wags. Lauermann, it seems, imagined himself
an excellent singer, and as a result of this presumption, evinced interest only
in those in whom he thought he recognised a like talent. In spite of the fact
that, owing to this singular peculiarity, he became the butt of constant jest
and scornful mockery, he never failed to appear every evening among his
laughter-loving persecutors. So often had he been laughed at and hurt by
their scorn, that it became very difficult to persuade him to give a display of
his artistic skill, and this at last could only be effected by artfully devised
traps, so laid as to appeal to his vanity. My arrival as an unknown stranger
was utilised for a manœuvre of this kind. How poor was the opinion they
held of the unfortunate mastersinger’s judgment was revealed when, to my
great amazement, my brother-in-law introduced me to him as the great
Italian singer, Lablache. To his credit I must confess that Lauermann
surveyed me for a long time with incredulous distrust, and commented with
cautious suspicion on my juvenile appearance, but especially on the
evidently tenor character of my voice. But the whole art of these tavern
associates and their principal enjoyment consisted in leading this poor
enthusiast to believe the incredible, a task on which they spared neither time
nor pains.
My brother-in-law succeeded in making the carpenter believe that I,
while receiving fabulous sums for my performances, wished by a singular
act of dissimulation, and by visiting public inns, to withdraw from the
general public; and that, moreover, when it came to a meeting between
‘Lauermann’ and ‘Lablache,’ the only real interest could be to hear
Lauermann and not Lablache, seeing that the former had nothing to learn
from the latter, but only Lablache from him. So singular was the conflict
between incredulity, on the one hand, and keenly excited vanity on the
other, that finally the poor carpenter became really attractive to me. I began
to play the role assigned me with all the skill I could command, and after a
couple of hours, which were relieved by the strangest antics, we at last
gained our end. The wondrous mortal, whose flashing eyes had long been
fixed on me in the greatest excitement, worked his muscles in the peculiarly
the inn, in which I also took part. A master carpenter, named Lauermann, a
little thick-set man, no longer young, of comical appearance and gifted only
with the roughest dialect, was pointed out to me in one of the inns visited
by our friends as one of those oddities who involuntarily contributed most
to the amusement of the local wags. Lauermann, it seems, imagined himself
an excellent singer, and as a result of this presumption, evinced interest only
in those in whom he thought he recognised a like talent. In spite of the fact
that, owing to this singular peculiarity, he became the butt of constant jest
and scornful mockery, he never failed to appear every evening among his
laughter-loving persecutors. So often had he been laughed at and hurt by
their scorn, that it became very difficult to persuade him to give a display of
his artistic skill, and this at last could only be effected by artfully devised
traps, so laid as to appeal to his vanity. My arrival as an unknown stranger
was utilised for a manœuvre of this kind. How poor was the opinion they
held of the unfortunate mastersinger’s judgment was revealed when, to my
great amazement, my brother-in-law introduced me to him as the great
Italian singer, Lablache. To his credit I must confess that Lauermann
surveyed me for a long time with incredulous distrust, and commented with
cautious suspicion on my juvenile appearance, but especially on the
evidently tenor character of my voice. But the whole art of these tavern
associates and their principal enjoyment consisted in leading this poor
enthusiast to believe the incredible, a task on which they spared neither time
nor pains.
My brother-in-law succeeded in making the carpenter believe that I,
while receiving fabulous sums for my performances, wished by a singular
act of dissimulation, and by visiting public inns, to withdraw from the
general public; and that, moreover, when it came to a meeting between
‘Lauermann’ and ‘Lablache,’ the only real interest could be to hear
Lauermann and not Lablache, seeing that the former had nothing to learn
from the latter, but only Lablache from him. So singular was the conflict
between incredulity, on the one hand, and keenly excited vanity on the
other, that finally the poor carpenter became really attractive to me. I began
to play the role assigned me with all the skill I could command, and after a
couple of hours, which were relieved by the strangest antics, we at last
gained our end. The wondrous mortal, whose flashing eyes had long been
fixed on me in the greatest excitement, worked his muscles in the peculiarly
Page 126
fantastic fashion which we are accustomed to associate with a music-
making automaton, the mechanism of which has been duly wound up: his
lips quivered, his teeth gnashed, his eyes rolled convulsively, until finally
there broke forth, in a hoarse oily voice, an uncommonly trivial street-
ballad. Its delivery, accompanied by a regular movement of his outstretched
thumbs behind the ears, and during which his fat face glowed the brightest
red, was unhappily greeted with a wild burst of laughter from all present,
which excited the unlucky master to the most furious wrath. With studied
cruelty this wrath was greeted by those, who until then had shamelessly
flattered him, with the most extravagant mockery, until the poor wretch at
last absolutely foamed with rage.
As he was leaving the inn amid a hail of curses from his infamous
friends, an impulse of genuine pity prompted me to follow him, that I might
beg his forgiveness and seek in some way to pacify him, a task all the more
difficult since he was especially bitter against me as the latest of his
enemies, and the one who had so deeply deceived his eager hope of hearing
the genuine Lablache. Nevertheless, I succeeded in stopping him on the
threshold; and now the riotous company silently entered into an
extraordinary conspiracy to induce Lauermann to sing again that very
evening. How they managed this I can as little remember as I can call to
mind the effect of the spirituous liquors I imbibed. In any case, I suspect
that drink must eventually have been the means of subduing Lauermann,
just as it also rendered my own recollections of the wonderful events of that
prolonged evening at the inn extremely vague. After Lauermann had for the
second time suffered the same mockery, the whole company felt itself
bound to accompany the unhappy man to his home. They carried him
thither in a wheelbarrow, which they found outside the house, and in this he
arrived, in triumph, at his own door, in one of those marvellous narrow
alleys peculiar to the old city. Frau Lauermann, who was aroused from
slumber to receive her husband, enabled us, by her torrent of curses, to form
some idea of the nature of their marital and domestic relations. Mockery of
her husband’s vocal talents was with her also a familiar theme; but to this
she now added the most dreadful reproaches for the worthless scamps who,
by encouraging him in this delusion, kept him from profitably following his
trade, and even led him to such scenes as the present one. Thereupon the
pride of the suffering mastersinger reasserted itself; for while his wife
painfully assisted him to mount the stairs, he harshly denied her right to sit
making automaton, the mechanism of which has been duly wound up: his
lips quivered, his teeth gnashed, his eyes rolled convulsively, until finally
there broke forth, in a hoarse oily voice, an uncommonly trivial street-
ballad. Its delivery, accompanied by a regular movement of his outstretched
thumbs behind the ears, and during which his fat face glowed the brightest
red, was unhappily greeted with a wild burst of laughter from all present,
which excited the unlucky master to the most furious wrath. With studied
cruelty this wrath was greeted by those, who until then had shamelessly
flattered him, with the most extravagant mockery, until the poor wretch at
last absolutely foamed with rage.
As he was leaving the inn amid a hail of curses from his infamous
friends, an impulse of genuine pity prompted me to follow him, that I might
beg his forgiveness and seek in some way to pacify him, a task all the more
difficult since he was especially bitter against me as the latest of his
enemies, and the one who had so deeply deceived his eager hope of hearing
the genuine Lablache. Nevertheless, I succeeded in stopping him on the
threshold; and now the riotous company silently entered into an
extraordinary conspiracy to induce Lauermann to sing again that very
evening. How they managed this I can as little remember as I can call to
mind the effect of the spirituous liquors I imbibed. In any case, I suspect
that drink must eventually have been the means of subduing Lauermann,
just as it also rendered my own recollections of the wonderful events of that
prolonged evening at the inn extremely vague. After Lauermann had for the
second time suffered the same mockery, the whole company felt itself
bound to accompany the unhappy man to his home. They carried him
thither in a wheelbarrow, which they found outside the house, and in this he
arrived, in triumph, at his own door, in one of those marvellous narrow
alleys peculiar to the old city. Frau Lauermann, who was aroused from
slumber to receive her husband, enabled us, by her torrent of curses, to form
some idea of the nature of their marital and domestic relations. Mockery of
her husband’s vocal talents was with her also a familiar theme; but to this
she now added the most dreadful reproaches for the worthless scamps who,
by encouraging him in this delusion, kept him from profitably following his
trade, and even led him to such scenes as the present one. Thereupon the
pride of the suffering mastersinger reasserted itself; for while his wife
painfully assisted him to mount the stairs, he harshly denied her right to sit
Page 127
in judgment upon his vocal gifts, and sternly ordered her to be silent. But
even now this wonderful night-adventure was by no means over. The entire
swarm moved once more in the direction of the inn. Before the house,
however, we found a number of fellows congregated, among them several
workmen, against whom, owing to police regulations as to closing hours,
the doors were shut. But the regular guests of the house, who were of our
party, and who were on terms of old friendship with the host, thought that it
was nevertheless permissible and possible to demand entrance. The host
was troubled at having to bar his door against friends, whose voices he
recognised; yet it was necessary to prevent the new arrivals from forcing a
way in with them. Out of this situation a mighty confusion arose, which,
what with shouting and clamour and an inexplicable growth in the number
of the disputants, soon assumed a truly demoniacal character. It seemed to
me as though in a few moments the whole town would break into a tumult,
and I thought I should once more have to witness a revolution, the real
origin of which no man could comprehend. Then suddenly I heard some
one fall, and, as though by magic, the whole mass scattered in every
direction. One of the regular guests, who was familiar with an ancient
Nuremberg boxing trick, desiring to put an end to the interminable riot and
to cut his way home through the crowd, gave one of the noisiest shouters a
blow with his fist between the eyes, laying him senseless on the ground,
though without seriously injuring him. And this it was that so speedily
broke up the whole throng. Within little more than a minute of the most
violent uproar of hundreds of human voices, my brother-in-law and I were
able to stroll arm-in-arm through the moonlit streets, quietly jesting and
laughing, on our way home; and then it was that, to my amazement and
relief, he informed me that he was accustomed to this sort of life every
evening.
At last, however, it became necessary seriously to attend to the purpose
of my journey. Only in passing did I touch at Wurzburg for a day. I
remember nothing of the meeting with my relations and acquaintance
beyond the melancholy visit to Friederike Galvani already mentioned. On
reaching Frankfort I was obliged to seek at once the shelter of a decent
hotel, in order to await there the result of my solicitations for subsidies from
the directorate of the Magdeburg theatre. My hopes of securing the real
stars of our operatic undertaking were formed with a view to a season at
Wiesbaden, where, I was told, a good operatic company was on the point of
even now this wonderful night-adventure was by no means over. The entire
swarm moved once more in the direction of the inn. Before the house,
however, we found a number of fellows congregated, among them several
workmen, against whom, owing to police regulations as to closing hours,
the doors were shut. But the regular guests of the house, who were of our
party, and who were on terms of old friendship with the host, thought that it
was nevertheless permissible and possible to demand entrance. The host
was troubled at having to bar his door against friends, whose voices he
recognised; yet it was necessary to prevent the new arrivals from forcing a
way in with them. Out of this situation a mighty confusion arose, which,
what with shouting and clamour and an inexplicable growth in the number
of the disputants, soon assumed a truly demoniacal character. It seemed to
me as though in a few moments the whole town would break into a tumult,
and I thought I should once more have to witness a revolution, the real
origin of which no man could comprehend. Then suddenly I heard some
one fall, and, as though by magic, the whole mass scattered in every
direction. One of the regular guests, who was familiar with an ancient
Nuremberg boxing trick, desiring to put an end to the interminable riot and
to cut his way home through the crowd, gave one of the noisiest shouters a
blow with his fist between the eyes, laying him senseless on the ground,
though without seriously injuring him. And this it was that so speedily
broke up the whole throng. Within little more than a minute of the most
violent uproar of hundreds of human voices, my brother-in-law and I were
able to stroll arm-in-arm through the moonlit streets, quietly jesting and
laughing, on our way home; and then it was that, to my amazement and
relief, he informed me that he was accustomed to this sort of life every
evening.
At last, however, it became necessary seriously to attend to the purpose
of my journey. Only in passing did I touch at Wurzburg for a day. I
remember nothing of the meeting with my relations and acquaintance
beyond the melancholy visit to Friederike Galvani already mentioned. On
reaching Frankfort I was obliged to seek at once the shelter of a decent
hotel, in order to await there the result of my solicitations for subsidies from
the directorate of the Magdeburg theatre. My hopes of securing the real
stars of our operatic undertaking were formed with a view to a season at
Wiesbaden, where, I was told, a good operatic company was on the point of
Page 128
dissolution. I found it extremely difficult to arrange the short journey
thither; yet I managed to be present at a rehearsal of Robert der Teufel, in
which the tenor Freimuller distinguished himself. I interviewed him at once,
and found him willing to entertain my proposals for Magdeburg. We
concluded the necessary agreement, and I then returned with all speed to
my headquarters, the Weidenbusch Hotel in Frankfort. There I had to spend
another anxious week, during which I waited in vain for the necessary
travelling expenses to arrive from Magdeburg. To kill time I had recourse,
among other things, to a large red pocket-book which I carried about with
me in my portmanteau, and in which I entered, with exact details of dates,
etc., notes for my future biography—the selfsame book which now lies
before me to freshen my memory, and which I have ever since added to at
various periods of my life, without leaving any gaps. Through the neglect of
the Magdeburg managers my situation, which was already serious, became
literally desperate, when I made an acquisition in Frankfort which gave me
almost more pleasure than I was able to bear. I had been present at a
production of the Zauberflote under the direction of Guhr, then wonderfully
renowned as ‘a conductor of genius,’ and was agreeably surprised at the
truly excellent quality of the company. It was, of course, useless to think of
luring one of the leading stars into my net; on the other hand, I saw clearly
enough that the youthful Fraulein Limbach, who sang the ‘first boy’s’ part,
possessed a desirable talent. She accepted my offer of an engagement, and,
indeed, seemed so anxious to be rid of her Frankfort engagement that she
resolved to escape from it surreptitiously. She revealed her plans to me, and
begged me to assist her in carrying them out; for, inasmuch as the directors
might get wind of the affair, there was no time to lose. At all events, the
young lady assumed that I had abundant credit, supplied for my official
business journey by the Magdeburg theatre committee, whose praises I had
so diligently sung. But already I had been compelled to pledge my scanty
travelling gear in order to provide for my own departure. To this point I had
persuaded the host, but now found him by no means inclined to advance me
the additional funds needed for carrying off a young singer. To cloak the
bad behaviour of my directors I was compelled to invent some tale of
misfortune, and to leave the astonished and indignant young lady behind.
Heartily ashamed of this adventure, I travelled through rain and storm via
Leipzig, where I picked up my brown poodle, and reaching Magdeburg,
there resumed my work as musical director on the 1st of September.
thither; yet I managed to be present at a rehearsal of Robert der Teufel, in
which the tenor Freimuller distinguished himself. I interviewed him at once,
and found him willing to entertain my proposals for Magdeburg. We
concluded the necessary agreement, and I then returned with all speed to
my headquarters, the Weidenbusch Hotel in Frankfort. There I had to spend
another anxious week, during which I waited in vain for the necessary
travelling expenses to arrive from Magdeburg. To kill time I had recourse,
among other things, to a large red pocket-book which I carried about with
me in my portmanteau, and in which I entered, with exact details of dates,
etc., notes for my future biography—the selfsame book which now lies
before me to freshen my memory, and which I have ever since added to at
various periods of my life, without leaving any gaps. Through the neglect of
the Magdeburg managers my situation, which was already serious, became
literally desperate, when I made an acquisition in Frankfort which gave me
almost more pleasure than I was able to bear. I had been present at a
production of the Zauberflote under the direction of Guhr, then wonderfully
renowned as ‘a conductor of genius,’ and was agreeably surprised at the
truly excellent quality of the company. It was, of course, useless to think of
luring one of the leading stars into my net; on the other hand, I saw clearly
enough that the youthful Fraulein Limbach, who sang the ‘first boy’s’ part,
possessed a desirable talent. She accepted my offer of an engagement, and,
indeed, seemed so anxious to be rid of her Frankfort engagement that she
resolved to escape from it surreptitiously. She revealed her plans to me, and
begged me to assist her in carrying them out; for, inasmuch as the directors
might get wind of the affair, there was no time to lose. At all events, the
young lady assumed that I had abundant credit, supplied for my official
business journey by the Magdeburg theatre committee, whose praises I had
so diligently sung. But already I had been compelled to pledge my scanty
travelling gear in order to provide for my own departure. To this point I had
persuaded the host, but now found him by no means inclined to advance me
the additional funds needed for carrying off a young singer. To cloak the
bad behaviour of my directors I was compelled to invent some tale of
misfortune, and to leave the astonished and indignant young lady behind.
Heartily ashamed of this adventure, I travelled through rain and storm via
Leipzig, where I picked up my brown poodle, and reaching Magdeburg,
there resumed my work as musical director on the 1st of September.
Page 129
The result of my business labours gave me but little joy. The director, it is
true, proved triumphantly that he had sent five whole golden louis to my
address in Frankfort, and that my tenor and the youthful lady-singer had
also been provided with proper contracts, but not with the fares and
advances demanded. Neither of them came; only the basso Graf arrived
with pedantic punctuality from Karlsbad, and immediately provoked the
chaff of our theatrical wags. He sang at a rehearsal of the Schweizerfamilie
with such a schoolmasterly drone that I completely lost my composure. The
arrival of my excellent brother-in-law Wolfram with my sister Clara was of
more advantage for musical comedy than for grand opera, and caused me
considerable trouble into the bargain; for, being honest folk and used to
decent living, they speedily perceived that, in spite of royal protection, the
condition of the theatre was but very insecure, as was natural under so
unscrupulous a management as that of Bethmann, and recognised with
alarm that they had seriously compromised their family position. My
courage had already begun to sink when a happy chance brought us a young
woman, Mme. Pollert (nee Zeibig), who was passing through Magdeburg
with her husband, an actor, in order to fulfil a special engagement in that
town; she was gifted with a beautiful voice, was a talented singer, and well
suited for the chief roles. Necessity had at last driven the directors to action,
and at the eleventh hour they sent for the tenor Freimuller. But I was
particularly gratified when the love which had arisen between him and
young Limbach in Frankfort enabled the enterprising tenor to carry away
this singer, to whom I had behaved so miserably. Both arrived radiant with
joy. Along with them we engaged Mme. Pollert, who, in spite of her
pretentiousness, met with favour from the public. A well-trained and
musically competent baritone, Herr Krug, afterwards the conductor of a
choir in Karlsruhe, had also been discovered, so that all at once I stood at
the head of a really good operatic company, among which the basso Graf
could be fitted in only with great difficulty, by being kept as much as
possible in the background. We succeeded quickly with a series of operatic
performances which were by no means ordinary, and our repertory included
everything of this nature that had ever been written for the theatre. I was
particularly pleased with the presentation of Spohr’s Jessonda, which was
truly not without sublimity, and raised us high in the esteem of all cultured
lovers of music. I was untiring in my endeavours to discover some means of
elevating our performances above the usual level of excellence compatible
true, proved triumphantly that he had sent five whole golden louis to my
address in Frankfort, and that my tenor and the youthful lady-singer had
also been provided with proper contracts, but not with the fares and
advances demanded. Neither of them came; only the basso Graf arrived
with pedantic punctuality from Karlsbad, and immediately provoked the
chaff of our theatrical wags. He sang at a rehearsal of the Schweizerfamilie
with such a schoolmasterly drone that I completely lost my composure. The
arrival of my excellent brother-in-law Wolfram with my sister Clara was of
more advantage for musical comedy than for grand opera, and caused me
considerable trouble into the bargain; for, being honest folk and used to
decent living, they speedily perceived that, in spite of royal protection, the
condition of the theatre was but very insecure, as was natural under so
unscrupulous a management as that of Bethmann, and recognised with
alarm that they had seriously compromised their family position. My
courage had already begun to sink when a happy chance brought us a young
woman, Mme. Pollert (nee Zeibig), who was passing through Magdeburg
with her husband, an actor, in order to fulfil a special engagement in that
town; she was gifted with a beautiful voice, was a talented singer, and well
suited for the chief roles. Necessity had at last driven the directors to action,
and at the eleventh hour they sent for the tenor Freimuller. But I was
particularly gratified when the love which had arisen between him and
young Limbach in Frankfort enabled the enterprising tenor to carry away
this singer, to whom I had behaved so miserably. Both arrived radiant with
joy. Along with them we engaged Mme. Pollert, who, in spite of her
pretentiousness, met with favour from the public. A well-trained and
musically competent baritone, Herr Krug, afterwards the conductor of a
choir in Karlsruhe, had also been discovered, so that all at once I stood at
the head of a really good operatic company, among which the basso Graf
could be fitted in only with great difficulty, by being kept as much as
possible in the background. We succeeded quickly with a series of operatic
performances which were by no means ordinary, and our repertory included
everything of this nature that had ever been written for the theatre. I was
particularly pleased with the presentation of Spohr’s Jessonda, which was
truly not without sublimity, and raised us high in the esteem of all cultured
lovers of music. I was untiring in my endeavours to discover some means of
elevating our performances above the usual level of excellence compatible
Page 130
with the meagre resources of provincial theatres. I persistently fell foul of
the director Bethmann by strengthening my orchestra, which he had to pay;
but, on the other hand, I won his complete goodwill by strengthening the
chorus and the theatre music, which cost him nothing, and which lent such
splendour to our presentations that subscriptions and audiences increased
enormously. For instance, I secured the regimental band, and also the
military singers, who in the Prussian army are admirably organised, and
who assisted in our performances in return for free passes to the gallery
granted to their relatives. Thus I managed to furnish with the utmost
completeness the specially strong orchestral accompaniment demanded by
the score of Bellini’s Norma, and was able to dispose of a body of male
voices for the impressive unison portion of the male chorus in the
introduction of that work such as even the greatest theatres could rarely
command. In later years I was able to assure Auber, whom I often met over
an ice in Tortoni’s cafe in Paris, that in his Lestocq I had been able to render
the part of the mutinous soldiery, when seduced into conspiracy, with an
absolutely full number of voices, a fact for which he thanked me with
astonishment and delight.
Amid such circumstances of encouragement the composition of my
Liebesverbot made rapid strides towards completion. I intended the
presentation of this piece for the benefit performance which had been
promised me as a means of defraying my expenses, and I worked hard in
the hope of improving my reputation, and at the same time of
accomplishing something by no means less desirable, and that was the
betterment of my financial position. Even the few hours which I could
snatch from business to spend at Minna’s side were devoted with
unexampled zeal to the completion of my score. My diligence moved even
Minna’s mother, who looked with some uneasiness upon our love affair.
She had remained over the summer on a visit to her daughter, and managed
the house for her. Owing to her interference a new and urgent anxiety had
entered into our relations, which pressed for serious settlement. It was
natural that we should begin to think of what it was all going to lead to. I
must confess that the idea of marriage, especially in view of my youth,
filled me with dismay, and without indeed reflecting on the matter, or
seriously weighing its pros and cons, a naive and instinctive feeling
prevented me even from considering the possibility of a step which would
have such serious consequences upon my whole life. Moreover, our modest
the director Bethmann by strengthening my orchestra, which he had to pay;
but, on the other hand, I won his complete goodwill by strengthening the
chorus and the theatre music, which cost him nothing, and which lent such
splendour to our presentations that subscriptions and audiences increased
enormously. For instance, I secured the regimental band, and also the
military singers, who in the Prussian army are admirably organised, and
who assisted in our performances in return for free passes to the gallery
granted to their relatives. Thus I managed to furnish with the utmost
completeness the specially strong orchestral accompaniment demanded by
the score of Bellini’s Norma, and was able to dispose of a body of male
voices for the impressive unison portion of the male chorus in the
introduction of that work such as even the greatest theatres could rarely
command. In later years I was able to assure Auber, whom I often met over
an ice in Tortoni’s cafe in Paris, that in his Lestocq I had been able to render
the part of the mutinous soldiery, when seduced into conspiracy, with an
absolutely full number of voices, a fact for which he thanked me with
astonishment and delight.
Amid such circumstances of encouragement the composition of my
Liebesverbot made rapid strides towards completion. I intended the
presentation of this piece for the benefit performance which had been
promised me as a means of defraying my expenses, and I worked hard in
the hope of improving my reputation, and at the same time of
accomplishing something by no means less desirable, and that was the
betterment of my financial position. Even the few hours which I could
snatch from business to spend at Minna’s side were devoted with
unexampled zeal to the completion of my score. My diligence moved even
Minna’s mother, who looked with some uneasiness upon our love affair.
She had remained over the summer on a visit to her daughter, and managed
the house for her. Owing to her interference a new and urgent anxiety had
entered into our relations, which pressed for serious settlement. It was
natural that we should begin to think of what it was all going to lead to. I
must confess that the idea of marriage, especially in view of my youth,
filled me with dismay, and without indeed reflecting on the matter, or
seriously weighing its pros and cons, a naive and instinctive feeling
prevented me even from considering the possibility of a step which would
have such serious consequences upon my whole life. Moreover, our modest
Page 131
circumstances were in so alarming and uncertain a state that even Minna
declared that she was more anxious to see these improved than to get me to
marry her. But she was also driven to think of herself, and that promptly, for
trouble arose with regard to her own position in the Magdeburg theatre.
There she had met with a rival in her own speciality, and as this woman’s
husband became chief stage manager, and consequently had supreme
power, she grew to be a source of great danger. Seeing, therefore, that at
this very moment Minna received advantageous offers from the managers
of the Konigstadt theatre in Berlin, then doing a splendid business, she
seized the opportunity to break off her connection with the Magdeburg
theatre, and thus plunged me, whom she did not appear to consider in the
matter, into the depths of despair. I could not hinder Minna from going to
Berlin to fulfil a special engagement there, although this was not in
accordance with her agreement, and so she departed, leaving me behind,
overcome with grief and doubt as to the meaning of her conduct. At last,
mad with passion, I wrote to her urging her to return, and the better to move
her and not to separate her fate from my own, I proposed to her in a strictly
formal manner, and hinted at the hope of early marriage. About the same
time my brother-in-law, Wolfram, having quarrelled with the director
Bethmann and cancelled his contract with him, also went to the Konigstadt
theatre to fulfil a special engagement. My good sister Clara, who had
remained behind for a while amid the somewhat unpleasant conditions of
Magdeburg, soon perceived the anxious and troubled temper in which her
otherwise cheerful brother was rapidly consuming himself. One day she
thought it advisable to show me a letter from her husband, with news from
Berlin, and especially concerning Minna, in which he earnestly deplored
my passion for this girl, who was acting quite unworthily of me. As she
lodged at his hotel, he was able to observe that not only the company she
kept, but also her own conduct, were perfectly scandalous. The
extraordinary impression which this dreadful communication made upon
me decided me to abandon the reserve I had hitherto shown towards my
relatives with regard to my love affairs. I wrote to my brother-in-law in
Berlin, telling him how matters stood with me, and that my plans greatly
depended on Minna, and further, how extremely important it was for me to
learn from him the indubitable truth concerning her of whom he had sent so
evil an account. From my brother-in-law, usually so dry and given to
joking, I received a reply which filled my heart to overflowing again. He
declared that she was more anxious to see these improved than to get me to
marry her. But she was also driven to think of herself, and that promptly, for
trouble arose with regard to her own position in the Magdeburg theatre.
There she had met with a rival in her own speciality, and as this woman’s
husband became chief stage manager, and consequently had supreme
power, she grew to be a source of great danger. Seeing, therefore, that at
this very moment Minna received advantageous offers from the managers
of the Konigstadt theatre in Berlin, then doing a splendid business, she
seized the opportunity to break off her connection with the Magdeburg
theatre, and thus plunged me, whom she did not appear to consider in the
matter, into the depths of despair. I could not hinder Minna from going to
Berlin to fulfil a special engagement there, although this was not in
accordance with her agreement, and so she departed, leaving me behind,
overcome with grief and doubt as to the meaning of her conduct. At last,
mad with passion, I wrote to her urging her to return, and the better to move
her and not to separate her fate from my own, I proposed to her in a strictly
formal manner, and hinted at the hope of early marriage. About the same
time my brother-in-law, Wolfram, having quarrelled with the director
Bethmann and cancelled his contract with him, also went to the Konigstadt
theatre to fulfil a special engagement. My good sister Clara, who had
remained behind for a while amid the somewhat unpleasant conditions of
Magdeburg, soon perceived the anxious and troubled temper in which her
otherwise cheerful brother was rapidly consuming himself. One day she
thought it advisable to show me a letter from her husband, with news from
Berlin, and especially concerning Minna, in which he earnestly deplored
my passion for this girl, who was acting quite unworthily of me. As she
lodged at his hotel, he was able to observe that not only the company she
kept, but also her own conduct, were perfectly scandalous. The
extraordinary impression which this dreadful communication made upon
me decided me to abandon the reserve I had hitherto shown towards my
relatives with regard to my love affairs. I wrote to my brother-in-law in
Berlin, telling him how matters stood with me, and that my plans greatly
depended on Minna, and further, how extremely important it was for me to
learn from him the indubitable truth concerning her of whom he had sent so
evil an account. From my brother-in-law, usually so dry and given to
joking, I received a reply which filled my heart to overflowing again. He
Page 132
confessed that he had accused Minna too hastily, and regretted that he had
allowed idle chatter to influence him in founding a charge, which, on
investigation, had proved to be altogether groundless and unjust; he
declared, moreover, that on nearer acquaintance and conversation with her
he had been so fully convinced of the genuineness and uprightness of her
character, that he hoped with all his heart that I might see my way to marry
her. And now a storm raged in my heart. I implored Minna to return at once,
and was glad to learn that, for her part, she was not inclined to renew her
engagement at the Berlin theatre, as she had now acquired a more intimate
knowledge of the life there, and found it too frivolous. All that remained,
then, was for me to facilitate the resumption of her Magdeburg engagement.
To this end, therefore, at a meeting of the theatre committee, I attacked the
director and his detested stage manager with such energy, and defended
Minna against the wrong done her by them both with such passion and
fervour, that the other members, astonished at the frank confession of my
affection, yielded to my wishes without any further ado. And now I set off
by extra post in the depth of night and in dreadful winter weather to meet
my returning sweetheart. I greeted her with tears of deepest joy, and led her
back in triumph to her cosy Magdeburg home, already become so dear to
me.
Meanwhile, as our two lives, thus severed for a while, were being drawn
more and more closely together, I finished the score of my Liebesverbot
about New Year 1836. For the development of my future plans I depended
not a little upon the success of this work; and Minna herself seemed not
disinclined to yield to my hopes in this respect. We had reason to be
concerned as to how matters would pan out for us at the beginning of the
spring, for this season is always a bad one in which to start such precarious
theatrical enterprises. In spite of royal support and the participation of the
theatre committee in the general management of the theatre, our worthy
director’s state of perennial bankruptcy suffered no alteration, and it seemed
as if his theatrical undertaking could not possibly last much longer in any
form. Nevertheless, with the help of the really first-rate company of singers
at my disposal, the production of my opera was to mark a complete change
in my unsatisfactory circumstances. With the view of recovering the
travelling expenses I had incurred during the previous summer, I was
entitled to a benefit performance. I naturally fixed this for the presentation
of my own work, and did my utmost so that this favour granted me by the
allowed idle chatter to influence him in founding a charge, which, on
investigation, had proved to be altogether groundless and unjust; he
declared, moreover, that on nearer acquaintance and conversation with her
he had been so fully convinced of the genuineness and uprightness of her
character, that he hoped with all his heart that I might see my way to marry
her. And now a storm raged in my heart. I implored Minna to return at once,
and was glad to learn that, for her part, she was not inclined to renew her
engagement at the Berlin theatre, as she had now acquired a more intimate
knowledge of the life there, and found it too frivolous. All that remained,
then, was for me to facilitate the resumption of her Magdeburg engagement.
To this end, therefore, at a meeting of the theatre committee, I attacked the
director and his detested stage manager with such energy, and defended
Minna against the wrong done her by them both with such passion and
fervour, that the other members, astonished at the frank confession of my
affection, yielded to my wishes without any further ado. And now I set off
by extra post in the depth of night and in dreadful winter weather to meet
my returning sweetheart. I greeted her with tears of deepest joy, and led her
back in triumph to her cosy Magdeburg home, already become so dear to
me.
Meanwhile, as our two lives, thus severed for a while, were being drawn
more and more closely together, I finished the score of my Liebesverbot
about New Year 1836. For the development of my future plans I depended
not a little upon the success of this work; and Minna herself seemed not
disinclined to yield to my hopes in this respect. We had reason to be
concerned as to how matters would pan out for us at the beginning of the
spring, for this season is always a bad one in which to start such precarious
theatrical enterprises. In spite of royal support and the participation of the
theatre committee in the general management of the theatre, our worthy
director’s state of perennial bankruptcy suffered no alteration, and it seemed
as if his theatrical undertaking could not possibly last much longer in any
form. Nevertheless, with the help of the really first-rate company of singers
at my disposal, the production of my opera was to mark a complete change
in my unsatisfactory circumstances. With the view of recovering the
travelling expenses I had incurred during the previous summer, I was
entitled to a benefit performance. I naturally fixed this for the presentation
of my own work, and did my utmost so that this favour granted me by the
Page 133
directors should prove as inexpensive to them as possible. As they would
nevertheless be compelled to incur some expense in the production of the
new opera, I agreed that the proceeds of the first presentation should be left
to them, while I should claim only those of the second. I did not consider it
altogether unsatisfactory that the time for the rehearsals was postponed until
the very end of the season, for it was reasonable to suppose that our
company, which was often greeted with unusual applause, would receive
special attention and favour from the public during its concluding
performances. Unfortunately, however, contrary to our expectations, we
never reached the proper close of this season, which had been fixed for the
end of April; for already in March, owing to irregularity in the payment of
salaries, the most popular members of the company, having found better
employment elsewhere, tendered their resignations to the management, and
the director, who was unable to raise the necessary cash, was compelled to
bow to the inevitable. Now, indeed, my spirits sank, for it seemed more than
doubtful whether my Liebesverbot would ever be produced at all. I owed it
entirely to the warm affection felt for me personally by all members of the
opera company, that the singers consented not only to remain until the end
of March, but also to undertake the toil of studying and rehearsing my
opera, a task which, considering the very limited time, promised to be
extremely arduous. In the event of our having to give two representations,
the time at our disposal was so very short that, for all the rehearsals, we had
but ten days before us. And since we were concerned not with a light
comedy or farce, but with a grand opera, and one which, in spite of the
trifling character of its music, contained numerous and powerful concerted
passages, the undertaking might have been regarded almost as foolhardy.
Nevertheless, I built my hopes upon the extraordinary exertions which the
singers so willingly made in order to please me; for they studied
continuously, morning, noon, and night. But seeing that, in spite of all this,
it was quite impossible to attain to perfection, especially in the matter of
words, in the case of every one of these harassed performers, I reckoned
further on my own acquired skill as conductor to achieve the final miracle
of success. The peculiar ability I possessed of helping the singers and of
making them, in spite of much uncertainty, seem to flow smoothly onwards,
was clearly demonstrated in our orchestral rehearsals, in which, by dint of
constant prompting, loud singing with the performers and vigorous
directions as to necessary action, I got the whole thing to run so easily that
nevertheless be compelled to incur some expense in the production of the
new opera, I agreed that the proceeds of the first presentation should be left
to them, while I should claim only those of the second. I did not consider it
altogether unsatisfactory that the time for the rehearsals was postponed until
the very end of the season, for it was reasonable to suppose that our
company, which was often greeted with unusual applause, would receive
special attention and favour from the public during its concluding
performances. Unfortunately, however, contrary to our expectations, we
never reached the proper close of this season, which had been fixed for the
end of April; for already in March, owing to irregularity in the payment of
salaries, the most popular members of the company, having found better
employment elsewhere, tendered their resignations to the management, and
the director, who was unable to raise the necessary cash, was compelled to
bow to the inevitable. Now, indeed, my spirits sank, for it seemed more than
doubtful whether my Liebesverbot would ever be produced at all. I owed it
entirely to the warm affection felt for me personally by all members of the
opera company, that the singers consented not only to remain until the end
of March, but also to undertake the toil of studying and rehearsing my
opera, a task which, considering the very limited time, promised to be
extremely arduous. In the event of our having to give two representations,
the time at our disposal was so very short that, for all the rehearsals, we had
but ten days before us. And since we were concerned not with a light
comedy or farce, but with a grand opera, and one which, in spite of the
trifling character of its music, contained numerous and powerful concerted
passages, the undertaking might have been regarded almost as foolhardy.
Nevertheless, I built my hopes upon the extraordinary exertions which the
singers so willingly made in order to please me; for they studied
continuously, morning, noon, and night. But seeing that, in spite of all this,
it was quite impossible to attain to perfection, especially in the matter of
words, in the case of every one of these harassed performers, I reckoned
further on my own acquired skill as conductor to achieve the final miracle
of success. The peculiar ability I possessed of helping the singers and of
making them, in spite of much uncertainty, seem to flow smoothly onwards,
was clearly demonstrated in our orchestral rehearsals, in which, by dint of
constant prompting, loud singing with the performers and vigorous
directions as to necessary action, I got the whole thing to run so easily that
Page 134
it seemed quite possible that the performance might be a reasonable success
after all. Unfortunately, we did not consider that in front of the public all
these drastic methods of moving the dramatic and musical machinery would
be restricted to the movements of my baton and to my facial expression. As
a matter of fact the singers, and especially the men, were so extraordinarily
uncertain that from beginning to end their embarrassment crippled the
effectiveness of every one of their parts. Freimuller, the tenor, whose
memory was most defective, sought to patch up the lively and emotional
character of his badly learned rule of the madcap Luzio by means of routine
work learned in Fra Diavolo and Zampa, and especially by the aid of an
enormously thick, brightly coloured and fluttering plume of feathers.
Consequently, as the directors failed to have the book of words printed in
time, it was impossible to blame the public for being in doubt as to the main
outlines of the story, seeing that they had only the sung words to guide
them. With the exception of a few portions played by the lady singers,
which were favourably received, the whole performance, which I had made
to depend largely upon bold, energetic action and speech, remained but a
musical shadow-play, to which the orchestra contributed its own
inexplicable effusions, sometimes with exaggerated noise. As characteristic
of the treatment of my tone-colour, I may mention that the band-master of a
Prussian military band, who, by the bye, had been well pleased with the
performance, felt it incumbent upon him to give me some well-meant hints
for my future guidance, as to the manipulation of the Turkish drum. Before
I relate the further history of this wonderful work of my youth, I will pause
a moment briefly to describe its character, and especially its poetical
elements.
Shakespeare’s play, which I kept throughout in mind as the foundation of
my story, was worked out in the following manner:—
An unnamed king of Sicily leaves his country, as I suggest, for a journey
to Naples, and hands over to the Regent appointed—whom I simply call
Friedrich, with the view of making him appear as German as possible—full
authority to exercise all the royal power in order to effect a complete reform
in the social habits of his capital, which had provoked the indignation of the
Council. At the opening of the play we see the servants of the public
authority busily employed either in shutting up or in pulling down the
houses of popular amusement in a suburb of Palermo, and in carrying off
the inmates, including hosts and servants, as prisoners. The populace
after all. Unfortunately, we did not consider that in front of the public all
these drastic methods of moving the dramatic and musical machinery would
be restricted to the movements of my baton and to my facial expression. As
a matter of fact the singers, and especially the men, were so extraordinarily
uncertain that from beginning to end their embarrassment crippled the
effectiveness of every one of their parts. Freimuller, the tenor, whose
memory was most defective, sought to patch up the lively and emotional
character of his badly learned rule of the madcap Luzio by means of routine
work learned in Fra Diavolo and Zampa, and especially by the aid of an
enormously thick, brightly coloured and fluttering plume of feathers.
Consequently, as the directors failed to have the book of words printed in
time, it was impossible to blame the public for being in doubt as to the main
outlines of the story, seeing that they had only the sung words to guide
them. With the exception of a few portions played by the lady singers,
which were favourably received, the whole performance, which I had made
to depend largely upon bold, energetic action and speech, remained but a
musical shadow-play, to which the orchestra contributed its own
inexplicable effusions, sometimes with exaggerated noise. As characteristic
of the treatment of my tone-colour, I may mention that the band-master of a
Prussian military band, who, by the bye, had been well pleased with the
performance, felt it incumbent upon him to give me some well-meant hints
for my future guidance, as to the manipulation of the Turkish drum. Before
I relate the further history of this wonderful work of my youth, I will pause
a moment briefly to describe its character, and especially its poetical
elements.
Shakespeare’s play, which I kept throughout in mind as the foundation of
my story, was worked out in the following manner:—
An unnamed king of Sicily leaves his country, as I suggest, for a journey
to Naples, and hands over to the Regent appointed—whom I simply call
Friedrich, with the view of making him appear as German as possible—full
authority to exercise all the royal power in order to effect a complete reform
in the social habits of his capital, which had provoked the indignation of the
Council. At the opening of the play we see the servants of the public
authority busily employed either in shutting up or in pulling down the
houses of popular amusement in a suburb of Palermo, and in carrying off
the inmates, including hosts and servants, as prisoners. The populace
Page 135
oppose this first step, and much scuffling ensues. In the thickest of the
throng the chief of the sbirri, Brighella (basso-buffo), after a preliminary
roll of drums for silence, reads out the Regent’s proclamation, according to
which the acts just performed are declared to be directed towards
establishing a higher moral tone in the manners and customs of the people.
A general outburst of scorn and a mocking chorus meets this
announcement. Luzio, a young nobleman and juvenile scape-grace (tenor),
seems inclined to thrust himself forward as leader of the mob, and at once
finds an occasion for playing a more active part in the cause of the
oppressed people on discovering his friend Claudio (also a tenor) being led
away to prison. From him he learns that, in pursuance of some musty old
law unearthed by Friedrich, he is to suffer the penalty of death for a certain
love escapade in which he is involved. His sweetheart, union with whom
had been prevented by the enmity of their parents, has borne him a child.
Friedrich’s puritanical zeal joins cause with the parents’ hatred; he fears the
worst, and sees no way of escape save through mercy, provided his sister
Isabella may be able, by her entreaties, to melt the Regent’s hard heart.
Claudio implores his friend at once to seek out Isabella in the convent of the
Sisters of St. Elizabeth, which she has recently entered as novice. There,
between the quiet walls of the convent, we first meet this sister, in
confidential intercourse with her friend Marianne, also a novice. Marianne
reveals to her friend, from whom she has long been parted, the unhappy fate
which has brought her to the place. Under vows of eternal fidelity she had
been persuaded to a secret liaison with a man of high rank. But finally,
when in extreme need she found herself not only forsaken, but threatened
by her betrayer, she discovered him to be the mightiest man in the state,
none other than the King’s Regent himself. Isabella’s indignation finds vent
in impassioned words, and is only pacified by her determination to forsake
a world in which so vile a crime can go unpunished.—When now Luzio
brings her tidings of her own brother’s fate, her disgust at her brother’s
misconduct is turned at once to scorn for the villainy of the hypocritical
Regent, who presumes so cruelly to punish the comparatively venial
offence of her brother, which, at least, was not stained by treachery. Her
violent outburst imprudently reveals her to Luzio in a seductive aspect;
smitten with sudden love, he urges her to quit the convent for ever and to
accept his hand. She contrives to check his boldness, but resolves at once to
avail herself of his escort to the Regent’s court of justice.—Here the trial
throng the chief of the sbirri, Brighella (basso-buffo), after a preliminary
roll of drums for silence, reads out the Regent’s proclamation, according to
which the acts just performed are declared to be directed towards
establishing a higher moral tone in the manners and customs of the people.
A general outburst of scorn and a mocking chorus meets this
announcement. Luzio, a young nobleman and juvenile scape-grace (tenor),
seems inclined to thrust himself forward as leader of the mob, and at once
finds an occasion for playing a more active part in the cause of the
oppressed people on discovering his friend Claudio (also a tenor) being led
away to prison. From him he learns that, in pursuance of some musty old
law unearthed by Friedrich, he is to suffer the penalty of death for a certain
love escapade in which he is involved. His sweetheart, union with whom
had been prevented by the enmity of their parents, has borne him a child.
Friedrich’s puritanical zeal joins cause with the parents’ hatred; he fears the
worst, and sees no way of escape save through mercy, provided his sister
Isabella may be able, by her entreaties, to melt the Regent’s hard heart.
Claudio implores his friend at once to seek out Isabella in the convent of the
Sisters of St. Elizabeth, which she has recently entered as novice. There,
between the quiet walls of the convent, we first meet this sister, in
confidential intercourse with her friend Marianne, also a novice. Marianne
reveals to her friend, from whom she has long been parted, the unhappy fate
which has brought her to the place. Under vows of eternal fidelity she had
been persuaded to a secret liaison with a man of high rank. But finally,
when in extreme need she found herself not only forsaken, but threatened
by her betrayer, she discovered him to be the mightiest man in the state,
none other than the King’s Regent himself. Isabella’s indignation finds vent
in impassioned words, and is only pacified by her determination to forsake
a world in which so vile a crime can go unpunished.—When now Luzio
brings her tidings of her own brother’s fate, her disgust at her brother’s
misconduct is turned at once to scorn for the villainy of the hypocritical
Regent, who presumes so cruelly to punish the comparatively venial
offence of her brother, which, at least, was not stained by treachery. Her
violent outburst imprudently reveals her to Luzio in a seductive aspect;
smitten with sudden love, he urges her to quit the convent for ever and to
accept his hand. She contrives to check his boldness, but resolves at once to
avail herself of his escort to the Regent’s court of justice.—Here the trial
Page 136
scene is prepared, and I introduce it by a burlesque hearing of several
persons charged by the sbirro captain with offences against morality. The
earnestness of the situation becomes more marked when the gloomy form
of Friedrich strides through the inrushing and unruly crowd, commanding
silence, and he himself undertakes the hearing of Claudio’s case in the
sternest manner possible. The implacable judge is already on the point of
pronouncing sentence when Isabella enters, and requests, before them all, a
private interview with the Regent. In this interview she behaves with noble
moderation towards the dreaded, yet despised man before her, and appeals
at first only to his mildness and mercy. His interruptions merely serve to
stimulate her ardour: she speaks of her brother’s offence in melting accents,
and implores forgiveness for so human and by no means unpardonable a
crime. Seeing the effect of her moving appeal, she continues with
increasing ardour to plead with the judge’s hard and unresponsive heart,
which can certainly not have remained untouched by sentiments such as
those which had actuated her brother, and she calls upon his memory of
these to support her desperate plea for pity. At last the ice of his heart is
broken. Friedrich, deeply stirred by Isabella’s beauty, can no longer contain
himself, and promises to grant her petition at the price of her own love.
Scarcely has she become aware of the unexpected effect of her words when,
filled with indignation at such incredible villainy, she cries to the people
through doors and windows to come in, that she may unmask the hypocrite
before the world. The crowd is already rushing tumultuously into the hall of
judgment, when, by a few significant hints, Friedrich, with frantic energy,
succeeds in making Isabella realise the impossibility of her plan. He would
simply deny her charge, boldly pretend that his offer was merely made to
test her, and would doubtless be readily believed so soon as it became only
a question of rebutting a charge of lightly making love to her. Isabella,
ashamed and confounded, recognises the madness of her first step, and
gnashes her teeth in silent despair. While then Friedrich once more
announces his stern resolve to the people, and pronounces sentence on the
prisoner, it suddenly occurs to Isabella, spurred by the painful recollection
of Marianne’s fate, that what she has failed to procure by open means she
might possibly obtain by craft. This thought suffices to dispel her sorrow,
and to fill her with utmost gaiety. Turning to her sorrowing brother, her
agitated friends, and the perplexed crowd, she assures them all that she is
ready to provide them with the most amusing of adventures. She declares
persons charged by the sbirro captain with offences against morality. The
earnestness of the situation becomes more marked when the gloomy form
of Friedrich strides through the inrushing and unruly crowd, commanding
silence, and he himself undertakes the hearing of Claudio’s case in the
sternest manner possible. The implacable judge is already on the point of
pronouncing sentence when Isabella enters, and requests, before them all, a
private interview with the Regent. In this interview she behaves with noble
moderation towards the dreaded, yet despised man before her, and appeals
at first only to his mildness and mercy. His interruptions merely serve to
stimulate her ardour: she speaks of her brother’s offence in melting accents,
and implores forgiveness for so human and by no means unpardonable a
crime. Seeing the effect of her moving appeal, she continues with
increasing ardour to plead with the judge’s hard and unresponsive heart,
which can certainly not have remained untouched by sentiments such as
those which had actuated her brother, and she calls upon his memory of
these to support her desperate plea for pity. At last the ice of his heart is
broken. Friedrich, deeply stirred by Isabella’s beauty, can no longer contain
himself, and promises to grant her petition at the price of her own love.
Scarcely has she become aware of the unexpected effect of her words when,
filled with indignation at such incredible villainy, she cries to the people
through doors and windows to come in, that she may unmask the hypocrite
before the world. The crowd is already rushing tumultuously into the hall of
judgment, when, by a few significant hints, Friedrich, with frantic energy,
succeeds in making Isabella realise the impossibility of her plan. He would
simply deny her charge, boldly pretend that his offer was merely made to
test her, and would doubtless be readily believed so soon as it became only
a question of rebutting a charge of lightly making love to her. Isabella,
ashamed and confounded, recognises the madness of her first step, and
gnashes her teeth in silent despair. While then Friedrich once more
announces his stern resolve to the people, and pronounces sentence on the
prisoner, it suddenly occurs to Isabella, spurred by the painful recollection
of Marianne’s fate, that what she has failed to procure by open means she
might possibly obtain by craft. This thought suffices to dispel her sorrow,
and to fill her with utmost gaiety. Turning to her sorrowing brother, her
agitated friends, and the perplexed crowd, she assures them all that she is
ready to provide them with the most amusing of adventures. She declares
Page 137
that the carnival festivities, which the Regent has just strictly forbidden, are
to be celebrated this year with unusual licence; for this dreaded ruler only
pretends to be so cruel, in order the more pleasantly to astonish them by
himself taking a merry part in all that he has just forbidden. They all believe
that she has gone mad, and Friedrich in particular reproves her
incomprehensible folly with passionate severity. But a few words on her
part suffice to transport the Regent himself with ecstasy; for in a whisper
she promises to grant his desire, and that on the following night she will
send him such a message as shall ensure his happiness.—And so ends the
first act in a whirl of excitement.
We learn the nature of the heroine’s hastily formed plan at the beginning
of the second act, in which she visits her brother in his cell, with the object
of discovering whether he is worthy of rescue. She reveals Friedrich’s
shameful proposal to him, and asks if he would wish to save his life at the
price of his sister’s dishonour. Then follow Claudio’s fury and fervent
declaration of his readiness to die; whereupon, bidding farewell to his sister,
at least for this life, he makes her the bearer of the most tender messages to
the dear girl whom he leaves behind. After this, sinking into a softer mood,
the unhappy man declines from a state of melancholy to one of weakness.
Isabella, who had already determined to inform him of his rescue, hesitates
in dismay when she sees him fall in this way from the heights of noble
enthusiasm to a muttered confession of a love of life still as strong as ever,
and even to a stammering query as to whether the suggested price of his
salvation is altogether impossible. Disgusted, she springs to her feet, thrusts
the unworthy man from her, and declares that to the shame of his death he
has further added her most hearty contempt. After having handed him over
again to his gaoler, her mood once more changes swiftly to one of wanton
gaiety. True, she resolves to punish the waverer by leaving him for a time in
uncertainty as to his fate; but stands firm by her resolve to rid the world of
the abominable seducer who dared to dictate laws to his fellow-men. She
tells Marianne that she must take her place at the nocturnal rendezvous, at
which Friedrich so treacherously expected to meet her (Isabella), and sends
Friedrich an invitation to this meeting. In order to entangle the latter even
more deeply in ruin, she stipulates that he must come disguised and
masked, and fixes the rendezvous in one of those pleasure resorts which he
has just suppressed. To the madcap Luzio, whom she also desires to punish
for his saucy suggestion to a novice, she relates the story of Friedrich’s
to be celebrated this year with unusual licence; for this dreaded ruler only
pretends to be so cruel, in order the more pleasantly to astonish them by
himself taking a merry part in all that he has just forbidden. They all believe
that she has gone mad, and Friedrich in particular reproves her
incomprehensible folly with passionate severity. But a few words on her
part suffice to transport the Regent himself with ecstasy; for in a whisper
she promises to grant his desire, and that on the following night she will
send him such a message as shall ensure his happiness.—And so ends the
first act in a whirl of excitement.
We learn the nature of the heroine’s hastily formed plan at the beginning
of the second act, in which she visits her brother in his cell, with the object
of discovering whether he is worthy of rescue. She reveals Friedrich’s
shameful proposal to him, and asks if he would wish to save his life at the
price of his sister’s dishonour. Then follow Claudio’s fury and fervent
declaration of his readiness to die; whereupon, bidding farewell to his sister,
at least for this life, he makes her the bearer of the most tender messages to
the dear girl whom he leaves behind. After this, sinking into a softer mood,
the unhappy man declines from a state of melancholy to one of weakness.
Isabella, who had already determined to inform him of his rescue, hesitates
in dismay when she sees him fall in this way from the heights of noble
enthusiasm to a muttered confession of a love of life still as strong as ever,
and even to a stammering query as to whether the suggested price of his
salvation is altogether impossible. Disgusted, she springs to her feet, thrusts
the unworthy man from her, and declares that to the shame of his death he
has further added her most hearty contempt. After having handed him over
again to his gaoler, her mood once more changes swiftly to one of wanton
gaiety. True, she resolves to punish the waverer by leaving him for a time in
uncertainty as to his fate; but stands firm by her resolve to rid the world of
the abominable seducer who dared to dictate laws to his fellow-men. She
tells Marianne that she must take her place at the nocturnal rendezvous, at
which Friedrich so treacherously expected to meet her (Isabella), and sends
Friedrich an invitation to this meeting. In order to entangle the latter even
more deeply in ruin, she stipulates that he must come disguised and
masked, and fixes the rendezvous in one of those pleasure resorts which he
has just suppressed. To the madcap Luzio, whom she also desires to punish
for his saucy suggestion to a novice, she relates the story of Friedrich’s
Page 138
proposal, and her pretended intention of complying, from sheer necessity,
with his desires. This she does in a fashion so incomprehensively light-
hearted that the otherwise frivolous man, first dumb with amazement,
ultimately yields to a fit of desperate rage. He swears that, even if the noble
maiden herself can endure such shame, he will himself strive by every
means in his power to avert it, and would prefer to set all Palermo on fire
and in tumult rather than allow such a thing to happen. And, indeed, he
arranges things in such a manner that on the appointed evening all his
friends and acquaintances assemble at the end of the Corso, as though for
the opening of the prohibited carnival procession. At nightfall, as things are
beginning to grow wild and merry, Luzio appears, and sings an extravagant
carnival song, with the refrain:
Who joins us not in frolic jest
Shall have a dagger in his breast;
by which means he seeks to stir the crowd to bloody revolt. When a band of
sbirri approaches, under Brighella’s leadership, to scatter the gay throng, the
mutinous project seems on the point of being accomplished. But for the
present Luzio prefers to yield, and to scatter about the neighbourhood, as he
must first of all win the real leader of their enterprise: for here was the spot
which Isabella had mischievously revealed to him as the place of her
pretended meeting with the Regent. For the latter Luzio therefore lies in
wait. Recognising him in an elaborate disguise, he blocks his way, and as
Friedrich violently breaks loose, is on the point of following him with
shouts and drawn sword, when, on a sign from Isabella, who is hidden
among some bushes, he is himself stopped and led away. Isabella then
advances, rejoicing in the thought of having restored the betrayed Marianne
to her faithless spouse. Believing that she holds in her hand the promised
pardon for her brother, she is just on the point of abandoning all thought of
further vengeance when, breaking the seal, to her intense horror she
recognises by the light of a torch that the paper contains but a still more
severe order of execution, which, owing to her desire not to disclose to her
brother the fact of his pardon, a mere chance had now delivered into her
hand, through the agency of the bribed gaoler. After a hard fight with the
tempestuous passion of love, and recognising his helplessness against this
enemy of his peace, Friedrich has in fact already resolved to face his ruin,
even though as a criminal, yet still as a man of honour. An hour on
with his desires. This she does in a fashion so incomprehensively light-
hearted that the otherwise frivolous man, first dumb with amazement,
ultimately yields to a fit of desperate rage. He swears that, even if the noble
maiden herself can endure such shame, he will himself strive by every
means in his power to avert it, and would prefer to set all Palermo on fire
and in tumult rather than allow such a thing to happen. And, indeed, he
arranges things in such a manner that on the appointed evening all his
friends and acquaintances assemble at the end of the Corso, as though for
the opening of the prohibited carnival procession. At nightfall, as things are
beginning to grow wild and merry, Luzio appears, and sings an extravagant
carnival song, with the refrain:
Who joins us not in frolic jest
Shall have a dagger in his breast;
by which means he seeks to stir the crowd to bloody revolt. When a band of
sbirri approaches, under Brighella’s leadership, to scatter the gay throng, the
mutinous project seems on the point of being accomplished. But for the
present Luzio prefers to yield, and to scatter about the neighbourhood, as he
must first of all win the real leader of their enterprise: for here was the spot
which Isabella had mischievously revealed to him as the place of her
pretended meeting with the Regent. For the latter Luzio therefore lies in
wait. Recognising him in an elaborate disguise, he blocks his way, and as
Friedrich violently breaks loose, is on the point of following him with
shouts and drawn sword, when, on a sign from Isabella, who is hidden
among some bushes, he is himself stopped and led away. Isabella then
advances, rejoicing in the thought of having restored the betrayed Marianne
to her faithless spouse. Believing that she holds in her hand the promised
pardon for her brother, she is just on the point of abandoning all thought of
further vengeance when, breaking the seal, to her intense horror she
recognises by the light of a torch that the paper contains but a still more
severe order of execution, which, owing to her desire not to disclose to her
brother the fact of his pardon, a mere chance had now delivered into her
hand, through the agency of the bribed gaoler. After a hard fight with the
tempestuous passion of love, and recognising his helplessness against this
enemy of his peace, Friedrich has in fact already resolved to face his ruin,
even though as a criminal, yet still as a man of honour. An hour on
Page 139
Isabella’s breast, and then—his own death by the same law whose
implacable severity shall also claim Claudio’s life. Isabella, perceiving in
this conduct only a further proof of the hypocrite’s villainy, breaks out once
more into a tempest of agonised despair. Upon her cry for immediate revolt
against the scoundrelly tyrant, the people collect together and form a motley
and passionate crowd. Luzio, who also returns, counsels the people with
stinging bitterness to pay no heed to the woman’s fury; he points out that
she is only tricking them, as she has already tricked him—for he still
believes in her shameless infidelity. Fresh confusion; increased despair of
Isabella; suddenly from the background comes the burlesque cry of
Brighella for help, who, himself suffering from the pangs of jealousy, has
by mistake arrested the masked Regent, and thus led to the latter’s
discovery. Friedrich is recognised, and Marianne, trembling on his breast, is
also unmasked. Amazement, indignation! Cries of joy burst forth all round;
the needful explanations are quickly given, and Friedrich sullenly demands
to be set before the judgment-seat of the returning King. Claudio, released
from prison by the jubilant populace, informs him that the sentence of death
for crimes of love is not intended for all times; messengers arrive to
announce the unexpected arrival in harbour of the King; it is resolved to
march in full masked procession to meet the beloved Prince, and joyously
to pay him homage, all being convinced that he will heartily rejoice to see
how ill the gloomy puritanism of Germany is suited to his hot-blooded
Sicily. Of him it is said:
Your merry festals please him more
Than gloomy laws or legal lore.
Friedrich, with his freshly affianced wife, Marianne, must lead the
procession, followed by Luzio and the novice, who is for ever lost to the
convent.
These spirited and, in many respects, boldly devised scenes I had clothed
in suitable language and carefully written verse, which had already been
noticed by Laube. The police at first took exception to the title of the work,
which, had I not changed it, would have led to the complete failure of my
plans for its presentation. It was the week before Easter, and the theatre was
consequently forbidden to produce jolly, or at least frivolous, plays during
this period. Luckily the magistrate, with whom I had to treat concerning the
matter, did not show any inclination to examine the libretto himself; and
implacable severity shall also claim Claudio’s life. Isabella, perceiving in
this conduct only a further proof of the hypocrite’s villainy, breaks out once
more into a tempest of agonised despair. Upon her cry for immediate revolt
against the scoundrelly tyrant, the people collect together and form a motley
and passionate crowd. Luzio, who also returns, counsels the people with
stinging bitterness to pay no heed to the woman’s fury; he points out that
she is only tricking them, as she has already tricked him—for he still
believes in her shameless infidelity. Fresh confusion; increased despair of
Isabella; suddenly from the background comes the burlesque cry of
Brighella for help, who, himself suffering from the pangs of jealousy, has
by mistake arrested the masked Regent, and thus led to the latter’s
discovery. Friedrich is recognised, and Marianne, trembling on his breast, is
also unmasked. Amazement, indignation! Cries of joy burst forth all round;
the needful explanations are quickly given, and Friedrich sullenly demands
to be set before the judgment-seat of the returning King. Claudio, released
from prison by the jubilant populace, informs him that the sentence of death
for crimes of love is not intended for all times; messengers arrive to
announce the unexpected arrival in harbour of the King; it is resolved to
march in full masked procession to meet the beloved Prince, and joyously
to pay him homage, all being convinced that he will heartily rejoice to see
how ill the gloomy puritanism of Germany is suited to his hot-blooded
Sicily. Of him it is said:
Your merry festals please him more
Than gloomy laws or legal lore.
Friedrich, with his freshly affianced wife, Marianne, must lead the
procession, followed by Luzio and the novice, who is for ever lost to the
convent.
These spirited and, in many respects, boldly devised scenes I had clothed
in suitable language and carefully written verse, which had already been
noticed by Laube. The police at first took exception to the title of the work,
which, had I not changed it, would have led to the complete failure of my
plans for its presentation. It was the week before Easter, and the theatre was
consequently forbidden to produce jolly, or at least frivolous, plays during
this period. Luckily the magistrate, with whom I had to treat concerning the
matter, did not show any inclination to examine the libretto himself; and
Page 140
when I assured him that it was modelled upon a very serious play of
Shakespeare’s, the authorities contented themselves merely with changing
the somewhat startling title. Die Novize van Palermo, which was the new
title, had nothing suspicious about it, and was therefore approved as correct
without further scruple. I fared quite otherwise in Leipzig, where I
attempted to introduce this work in the place of my Feen, when the latter
was withdrawn. The director, Ringelhardt, whom I sought to win over to my
cause by assigning the part of Marianne to his daughter, then making her
debut in opera, chose to reject my work on the apparently very reasonable
grounds that the tendency of the theme displeased him. He assured me that,
even if the Leipzig magistrates had consented to its production—a fact
concerning which his high esteem for that body led him to have serious
doubts—he himself, as a conscientious father, could certainly not permit his
daughter to take part in it.
Strange to say, I suffered nothing from the suspicious nature of the
libretto of my opera on the occasion of its production in Magdeburg; for, as
I have said, thanks to the unintelligible manner in which it was produced,
the story remained a complete mystery to the public. This circumstance, and
the fact that no opposition had been raised on the ground of its
TENDENCY, made a second performance possible, and as nobody seemed
to care one way or the other, no objections were raised. Feeling sure that my
opera had made no impression, and had left the public completely
undecided about its merits, I reckoned that, in view of this being the
farewell performance of our opera company, we should have good, not to
say large, takings. Consequently I did not hesitate to charge ‘full’ prices for
admittance. I cannot rightly judge whether, up to the commencement of the
overture, any people had taken their places in the auditorium; but about a
quarter of an hour before the time fixed for beginning, I saw only Mme.
Gottschalk and her husband, and, curiously enough, a Polish Jew in full
dress, seated in the stalls. Despite this, I was still hoping for an increase in
the audience, when suddenly the most incredible commotion occurred
behind the scenes. Herr Pollert, the husband of my prima donna (who was
acting Isabella), was assaulting Schreiber, the second tenor, a very young
and handsome man taking the part of Claudio, and against whom the
injured husband had for some time been nursing a secret rancour born of
jealousy. It appeared that the singer’s husband, who had surveyed the
theatre from behind the drop-scene with me, had satisfied himself as to the
Shakespeare’s, the authorities contented themselves merely with changing
the somewhat startling title. Die Novize van Palermo, which was the new
title, had nothing suspicious about it, and was therefore approved as correct
without further scruple. I fared quite otherwise in Leipzig, where I
attempted to introduce this work in the place of my Feen, when the latter
was withdrawn. The director, Ringelhardt, whom I sought to win over to my
cause by assigning the part of Marianne to his daughter, then making her
debut in opera, chose to reject my work on the apparently very reasonable
grounds that the tendency of the theme displeased him. He assured me that,
even if the Leipzig magistrates had consented to its production—a fact
concerning which his high esteem for that body led him to have serious
doubts—he himself, as a conscientious father, could certainly not permit his
daughter to take part in it.
Strange to say, I suffered nothing from the suspicious nature of the
libretto of my opera on the occasion of its production in Magdeburg; for, as
I have said, thanks to the unintelligible manner in which it was produced,
the story remained a complete mystery to the public. This circumstance, and
the fact that no opposition had been raised on the ground of its
TENDENCY, made a second performance possible, and as nobody seemed
to care one way or the other, no objections were raised. Feeling sure that my
opera had made no impression, and had left the public completely
undecided about its merits, I reckoned that, in view of this being the
farewell performance of our opera company, we should have good, not to
say large, takings. Consequently I did not hesitate to charge ‘full’ prices for
admittance. I cannot rightly judge whether, up to the commencement of the
overture, any people had taken their places in the auditorium; but about a
quarter of an hour before the time fixed for beginning, I saw only Mme.
Gottschalk and her husband, and, curiously enough, a Polish Jew in full
dress, seated in the stalls. Despite this, I was still hoping for an increase in
the audience, when suddenly the most incredible commotion occurred
behind the scenes. Herr Pollert, the husband of my prima donna (who was
acting Isabella), was assaulting Schreiber, the second tenor, a very young
and handsome man taking the part of Claudio, and against whom the
injured husband had for some time been nursing a secret rancour born of
jealousy. It appeared that the singer’s husband, who had surveyed the
theatre from behind the drop-scene with me, had satisfied himself as to the
Page 141
style of the audience, and decided that the longed-for hour was at hand
when, without injuring the operatic enterprise, he could wreak vengeance
on his wife’s lover. Claudio was so severely used by him that the
unfortunate fellow had to seek refuge in the dressing-room, his face covered
with blood. Isabella was told of this, and rushed despairingly to her raging
spouse, only to be so soundly cuffed by him that she went into convulsions.
The confusion that ensued amongst the company soon knew no bounds:
they took sides in the quarrel, and little was wanting for it to turn into a
general fight, as everybody seemed to regard this unhappy evening as
particularly favourable for the paying off of any old scores and supposed
insults. This much was clear, that the couple suffering from the effects of
Herr Pollert’s conjugal resentment were unfit to appear that evening. The
manager was sent before the drop-scene to inform the small and strangely
assorted audience gathered in the theatre that, owing to unforeseen
circumstances, the representation would not take place.
This was the end of my career as director and composer in Magdeburg,
which in the beginning had seemed so full of promise and had been started
at the cost of considerable sacrifice. The serenity of art now gave way
completely before the stern realities of life. My position gave food for
meditation, and the outlook was not a cheerful one. All the hopes that I and
Minna had founded upon the success of my work had been utterly
destroyed. My creditors, who had been appeased by the anticipation of the
expected harvest, lost faith in my talents, and now counted solely on
obtaining bodily possession of me, which they endeavoured to do by
speedily instituting legal proceedings. Now that every time I came home I
found a summons nailed to my door, my little dwelling in the Breiter Weg
became unbearable; I avoided going there, especially since my brown
poodle, who had hitherto enlivened this retreat, had vanished, leaving no
trace. This I looked upon as a bad sign, indicating my complete downfall.
At this time Minna, with her truly comforting assurance and firmness of
bearing, was a tower of strength to me and the one thing I had left to fall
back upon. Always full of resource, she had first of all provided for her own
future, and was on the point of signing a not unfavourable contract with the
directors of the theatre at Königsberg in Prussia. It was now a question of
finding me an appointment in the same place as musical conductor; this
post was already filled. The Königsberg director, however, gathering from
our correspondence that Minna’s acceptance of the engagement depended
when, without injuring the operatic enterprise, he could wreak vengeance
on his wife’s lover. Claudio was so severely used by him that the
unfortunate fellow had to seek refuge in the dressing-room, his face covered
with blood. Isabella was told of this, and rushed despairingly to her raging
spouse, only to be so soundly cuffed by him that she went into convulsions.
The confusion that ensued amongst the company soon knew no bounds:
they took sides in the quarrel, and little was wanting for it to turn into a
general fight, as everybody seemed to regard this unhappy evening as
particularly favourable for the paying off of any old scores and supposed
insults. This much was clear, that the couple suffering from the effects of
Herr Pollert’s conjugal resentment were unfit to appear that evening. The
manager was sent before the drop-scene to inform the small and strangely
assorted audience gathered in the theatre that, owing to unforeseen
circumstances, the representation would not take place.
This was the end of my career as director and composer in Magdeburg,
which in the beginning had seemed so full of promise and had been started
at the cost of considerable sacrifice. The serenity of art now gave way
completely before the stern realities of life. My position gave food for
meditation, and the outlook was not a cheerful one. All the hopes that I and
Minna had founded upon the success of my work had been utterly
destroyed. My creditors, who had been appeased by the anticipation of the
expected harvest, lost faith in my talents, and now counted solely on
obtaining bodily possession of me, which they endeavoured to do by
speedily instituting legal proceedings. Now that every time I came home I
found a summons nailed to my door, my little dwelling in the Breiter Weg
became unbearable; I avoided going there, especially since my brown
poodle, who had hitherto enlivened this retreat, had vanished, leaving no
trace. This I looked upon as a bad sign, indicating my complete downfall.
At this time Minna, with her truly comforting assurance and firmness of
bearing, was a tower of strength to me and the one thing I had left to fall
back upon. Always full of resource, she had first of all provided for her own
future, and was on the point of signing a not unfavourable contract with the
directors of the theatre at Königsberg in Prussia. It was now a question of
finding me an appointment in the same place as musical conductor; this
post was already filled. The Königsberg director, however, gathering from
our correspondence that Minna’s acceptance of the engagement depended
Page 142
upon the possibility of my being taken on at the same theatre, held out the
prospect of an approaching vacancy, and expressed his willingness to allow
it to be filled by me. On the strength of this assurance it was decided that
Minna should go on to Königsberg and pave the way for my arrival there.
Ere these plans could be carried out, we had still to spend a time of
dreadful and acute anxiety, which I shall never forget, within the walls of
Magdeburg. It is true I made one more personal attempt in Leipzig to
improve my position, on which occasion I entered into the transactions
mentioned above with the director of the theatre regarding my new opera.
But I soon realised that it was out of the question for me to remain in my
native town, and in the disquieting proximity of my family, from which I
was restlessly anxious to get away. My excitability and depression were
noticed by my relations. My mother entreated me, whatever else I might
decide to do, on no account to be drawn into marriage while still so young.
To this I made no reply. When I took my leave, Rosalie accompanied me to
the head of the stairs. I spoke of returning as soon as I had attended to
certain important business matters, and wanted to wish her a hurried good-
bye: she grasped my hand, and gazing into my face, exclaimed, “God alone
knows when I shall see you again!” This cut me to the heart, and I felt
conscience-stricken. The fact that she was expressing the presentiment she
felt of her early death I only realised when, barely two years later, without
having seen her again, I received the news that she had died very suddenly.
I spent a few more weeks with Minna in the strictest retirement in
Magdeburg: she endeavoured to the best of her ability to relieve the
embarrassment of my position. In view of our approaching separation, and
the length of time we might be parted, I hardly left her side, our only
relaxation being the walks we took together round the outskirts of the town.
Anxious forebodings weighed upon us; the May sun which lit the sad
streets of Magdeburg, as if in mockery of our forlorn condition, was one
day more clouded over than I have ever seen it since, and filled me with a
positive dread. On our way home from one of these walks, as we were
approaching the bridge crossing the Elbe, we caught sight of a man flinging
himself from it into the water beneath. We ran to the bank, called for help,
and persuaded a miller, whose mill was situated on the river, to hold out a
rake to the drowning man, who was being swept in his direction by the
current. With indescribable anxiety we waited for the decisive moment—
saw the sinking man stretch out his hands towards the rake, but he failed to
prospect of an approaching vacancy, and expressed his willingness to allow
it to be filled by me. On the strength of this assurance it was decided that
Minna should go on to Königsberg and pave the way for my arrival there.
Ere these plans could be carried out, we had still to spend a time of
dreadful and acute anxiety, which I shall never forget, within the walls of
Magdeburg. It is true I made one more personal attempt in Leipzig to
improve my position, on which occasion I entered into the transactions
mentioned above with the director of the theatre regarding my new opera.
But I soon realised that it was out of the question for me to remain in my
native town, and in the disquieting proximity of my family, from which I
was restlessly anxious to get away. My excitability and depression were
noticed by my relations. My mother entreated me, whatever else I might
decide to do, on no account to be drawn into marriage while still so young.
To this I made no reply. When I took my leave, Rosalie accompanied me to
the head of the stairs. I spoke of returning as soon as I had attended to
certain important business matters, and wanted to wish her a hurried good-
bye: she grasped my hand, and gazing into my face, exclaimed, “God alone
knows when I shall see you again!” This cut me to the heart, and I felt
conscience-stricken. The fact that she was expressing the presentiment she
felt of her early death I only realised when, barely two years later, without
having seen her again, I received the news that she had died very suddenly.
I spent a few more weeks with Minna in the strictest retirement in
Magdeburg: she endeavoured to the best of her ability to relieve the
embarrassment of my position. In view of our approaching separation, and
the length of time we might be parted, I hardly left her side, our only
relaxation being the walks we took together round the outskirts of the town.
Anxious forebodings weighed upon us; the May sun which lit the sad
streets of Magdeburg, as if in mockery of our forlorn condition, was one
day more clouded over than I have ever seen it since, and filled me with a
positive dread. On our way home from one of these walks, as we were
approaching the bridge crossing the Elbe, we caught sight of a man flinging
himself from it into the water beneath. We ran to the bank, called for help,
and persuaded a miller, whose mill was situated on the river, to hold out a
rake to the drowning man, who was being swept in his direction by the
current. With indescribable anxiety we waited for the decisive moment—
saw the sinking man stretch out his hands towards the rake, but he failed to
Page 143
grasp it, and at the same moment disappeared under the mill, never to be
seen again. On the morning that I accompanied Minna to the stage-coach to
bid her a most sorrowful farewell, the whole population was pouring from
one of the gateways of the town towards a big field, to witness the
execution of a man condemned to be put to death on the wheel ‘from
below.’[7] The culprit was a soldier who had murdered his sweetheart in a fit
of jealousy. When, later in the day, I sat down to my last dinner at the inn, I
heard the dreadful details of the Prussian mode of execution being
discussed on all sides. A young magistrate, who was a great lover of music,
told us about a conversation he had had with the executioner, who had been
procured from Halle, and with whom he had discussed the most humane
method of hastening the death of the victim; in telling us about him, he
recalled the elegant dress and manners of this ill-omened person with a
shudder.
[7] Durch das Rod van unten. The punishment of the wheel was usually inflicted
upon murderers, incendiaries, highwaymen and church robbers. There were two
methods of inflicting this: (1) ‘from above downwards’ (von oben nach unten), in
which the condemned man was despatched instantly owing to his neck getting
broken from the start; and (2) ‘from below upwards’ (von unten nach oben),
which is the method referred to above, and in which all the limbs of the victim
were broken previous to his body being actually twisted through the spokes of
the wheel.—Editor
These were the last impressions I carried away from the scene of my first
artistic efforts and of my attempts at earning an independent livelihood.
Often since then on my departure from places where I had expected to find
prosperity, and to which I knew I should never return, those impressions
have recurred to my mind with singular persistence. I have always had
much the same feelings upon leaving any place where I had stayed in the
hope of improving my position.
Thus I arrived in Berlin for the first time on the 18th May, 1836, and
made acquaintance with the peculiar features of that pretentious royal
capital. While my position was an uncertain one, I sought a modest shelter
at the Crown Prince in the Königstrasse, where Minna had stayed a few
months before. I found a friend on whom I could rely when I came across
Laube again, who, while awaiting his verdict, was busying himself with
private and literary work in Berlin. He was much interested in the fate of
my work Liebesverbot, and advised me to turn my present situation to
account for the purpose of obtaining the production of this opera at the
seen again. On the morning that I accompanied Minna to the stage-coach to
bid her a most sorrowful farewell, the whole population was pouring from
one of the gateways of the town towards a big field, to witness the
execution of a man condemned to be put to death on the wheel ‘from
below.’[7] The culprit was a soldier who had murdered his sweetheart in a fit
of jealousy. When, later in the day, I sat down to my last dinner at the inn, I
heard the dreadful details of the Prussian mode of execution being
discussed on all sides. A young magistrate, who was a great lover of music,
told us about a conversation he had had with the executioner, who had been
procured from Halle, and with whom he had discussed the most humane
method of hastening the death of the victim; in telling us about him, he
recalled the elegant dress and manners of this ill-omened person with a
shudder.
[7] Durch das Rod van unten. The punishment of the wheel was usually inflicted
upon murderers, incendiaries, highwaymen and church robbers. There were two
methods of inflicting this: (1) ‘from above downwards’ (von oben nach unten), in
which the condemned man was despatched instantly owing to his neck getting
broken from the start; and (2) ‘from below upwards’ (von unten nach oben),
which is the method referred to above, and in which all the limbs of the victim
were broken previous to his body being actually twisted through the spokes of
the wheel.—Editor
These were the last impressions I carried away from the scene of my first
artistic efforts and of my attempts at earning an independent livelihood.
Often since then on my departure from places where I had expected to find
prosperity, and to which I knew I should never return, those impressions
have recurred to my mind with singular persistence. I have always had
much the same feelings upon leaving any place where I had stayed in the
hope of improving my position.
Thus I arrived in Berlin for the first time on the 18th May, 1836, and
made acquaintance with the peculiar features of that pretentious royal
capital. While my position was an uncertain one, I sought a modest shelter
at the Crown Prince in the Königstrasse, where Minna had stayed a few
months before. I found a friend on whom I could rely when I came across
Laube again, who, while awaiting his verdict, was busying himself with
private and literary work in Berlin. He was much interested in the fate of
my work Liebesverbot, and advised me to turn my present situation to
account for the purpose of obtaining the production of this opera at the
Page 144
Konigstadt theatre. This theatre was under the direction of one of the most
curious creatures in Berlin: he was called ‘Cerf,’ and the title of
Commissionsrath had been conferred upon him by the King of Prussia. To
account for the favours bestowed upon him by royalty, many reasons of a
not very edifying nature were circulated. Through this royal patronage he
had succeeded in extending considerably the privileges already enjoyed by
the suburban theatre. The decline of grand opera at the Theatre Royal had
brought light opera, which was performed with great success at the
Konigstadt theatre, into public favour. The director, puffed up by success,
openly laboured under the delusion that he was the right man in the right
place, and expressed his entire agreement with those who declared that one
could only expect a theatre to be successfully managed by common and
uneducated men, and continued to cling to his blissful and boundless state
of ignorance in the most amusing manner. Relying absolutely upon his own
insight, he had assumed an entirely dictatorial attitude towards the officially
appointed artists of his theatre, and allowed himself to deal with them
according to his likes and dislikes. I seemed destined to be favoured by this
mode of procedure: at my very first visit Cerf expressed his satisfaction
with me, but wished to make use of me as a ‘tenor.’ He offered no objection
whatever to my request for the production of my opera, but, on the contrary,
promised to have it staged immediately. He seemed particularly anxious to
appoint me conductor of the orchestra. As he was on the point of changing
his operatic company, he foresaw that his present conductor, Glaser, the
composer of Adlershorst, would hinder his plans by taking the part of the
older singers: he was therefore anxious to have me associated with his
theatre, that he might have some one to support him who was favourably
disposed towards the new singers.
All this sounded so plausible, that I could scarcely be blamed for
believing that the wheel of fortune had taken a favourable turn for me, and
for feeling a sense of lightheartedness at the thought of such rosy prospects.
I had scarcely allowed myself the few modifications in my manner of living
which these improved circumstances seemed to justify, ere it was made
clear to me that my hopes were built upon sand. I was filled with positive
dread when I soon fully realised how nearly Cerf had come to defrauding
me, merely it would seem for his own amusement. After the manner of
despots, he had given his favours personally and autocratically; the
withdrawal and annulment of his promises, however, he made known to me
curious creatures in Berlin: he was called ‘Cerf,’ and the title of
Commissionsrath had been conferred upon him by the King of Prussia. To
account for the favours bestowed upon him by royalty, many reasons of a
not very edifying nature were circulated. Through this royal patronage he
had succeeded in extending considerably the privileges already enjoyed by
the suburban theatre. The decline of grand opera at the Theatre Royal had
brought light opera, which was performed with great success at the
Konigstadt theatre, into public favour. The director, puffed up by success,
openly laboured under the delusion that he was the right man in the right
place, and expressed his entire agreement with those who declared that one
could only expect a theatre to be successfully managed by common and
uneducated men, and continued to cling to his blissful and boundless state
of ignorance in the most amusing manner. Relying absolutely upon his own
insight, he had assumed an entirely dictatorial attitude towards the officially
appointed artists of his theatre, and allowed himself to deal with them
according to his likes and dislikes. I seemed destined to be favoured by this
mode of procedure: at my very first visit Cerf expressed his satisfaction
with me, but wished to make use of me as a ‘tenor.’ He offered no objection
whatever to my request for the production of my opera, but, on the contrary,
promised to have it staged immediately. He seemed particularly anxious to
appoint me conductor of the orchestra. As he was on the point of changing
his operatic company, he foresaw that his present conductor, Glaser, the
composer of Adlershorst, would hinder his plans by taking the part of the
older singers: he was therefore anxious to have me associated with his
theatre, that he might have some one to support him who was favourably
disposed towards the new singers.
All this sounded so plausible, that I could scarcely be blamed for
believing that the wheel of fortune had taken a favourable turn for me, and
for feeling a sense of lightheartedness at the thought of such rosy prospects.
I had scarcely allowed myself the few modifications in my manner of living
which these improved circumstances seemed to justify, ere it was made
clear to me that my hopes were built upon sand. I was filled with positive
dread when I soon fully realised how nearly Cerf had come to defrauding
me, merely it would seem for his own amusement. After the manner of
despots, he had given his favours personally and autocratically; the
withdrawal and annulment of his promises, however, he made known to me
Page 145
through his servants and secretaries, thus placing his strange conduct
towards me in the light of the inevitable result of his dependence upon
officialdom.
As Cerf wished to rid himself of me without even offering me
compensation, I was obliged to try to come to some understanding
regarding all that had been definitely arranged between us, and this with the
very people against whom he had previously warned me and had wanted
me to side with him. The conductor, stage manager, secretary, etc., had to
make it clear to me that my wishes could not be satisfied, and that the
director owed me no compensation whatever for the time he had made me
waste while awaiting the fulfilment of his promises. This unpleasant
experience has been a source of pain to me ever since.
Owing to all this my position was very much worse than it had been
before. Minna wrote to me frequently from Königsberg, but she had nothing
encouraging to tell me with regard to my hopes in that direction. The
director of the theatre there seemed unable to come to any clear
understanding with his conductor, a circumstance which I was afterwards
able to understand, but which at the time appeared to me inexplicable, and
made my chance of obtaining the coveted appointment seem exceedingly
remote. It seemed certain, however, that the post would be vacant in the
autumn, and as I was drifting about aimlessly in Berlin and refused for a
moment to entertain the thought of returning to Leipzig, I snatched at this
faint hope, and in imagination soared above the Berlin quicksands to the
safety of the harbour on the Baltic.
I only succeeded in doing so, however, after I had struggled through
difficult and serious inward conflicts to which my relations with Minna
gave rise. An incomprehensible feature in the character of this otherwise
apparently simple-minded woman had thrown my young heart into a
turmoil. A good-natured, well-to-do tradesman of Jewish extraction, named
Schwabe, who till that time had been established in Magdeburg, made
friendly advances to me in Berlin, and I soon discovered that his sympathy
was chiefly due to the passionate interest which he had conceived for
Minna. It afterwards became clear to me that an intimacy had existed
between this man and Minna, which in itself could hardly be considered as
a breach of faith towards me, since it had ended in a decided repulse of my
rival’s courtship in my favour. But the fact of this episode having been kept
towards me in the light of the inevitable result of his dependence upon
officialdom.
As Cerf wished to rid himself of me without even offering me
compensation, I was obliged to try to come to some understanding
regarding all that had been definitely arranged between us, and this with the
very people against whom he had previously warned me and had wanted
me to side with him. The conductor, stage manager, secretary, etc., had to
make it clear to me that my wishes could not be satisfied, and that the
director owed me no compensation whatever for the time he had made me
waste while awaiting the fulfilment of his promises. This unpleasant
experience has been a source of pain to me ever since.
Owing to all this my position was very much worse than it had been
before. Minna wrote to me frequently from Königsberg, but she had nothing
encouraging to tell me with regard to my hopes in that direction. The
director of the theatre there seemed unable to come to any clear
understanding with his conductor, a circumstance which I was afterwards
able to understand, but which at the time appeared to me inexplicable, and
made my chance of obtaining the coveted appointment seem exceedingly
remote. It seemed certain, however, that the post would be vacant in the
autumn, and as I was drifting about aimlessly in Berlin and refused for a
moment to entertain the thought of returning to Leipzig, I snatched at this
faint hope, and in imagination soared above the Berlin quicksands to the
safety of the harbour on the Baltic.
I only succeeded in doing so, however, after I had struggled through
difficult and serious inward conflicts to which my relations with Minna
gave rise. An incomprehensible feature in the character of this otherwise
apparently simple-minded woman had thrown my young heart into a
turmoil. A good-natured, well-to-do tradesman of Jewish extraction, named
Schwabe, who till that time had been established in Magdeburg, made
friendly advances to me in Berlin, and I soon discovered that his sympathy
was chiefly due to the passionate interest which he had conceived for
Minna. It afterwards became clear to me that an intimacy had existed
between this man and Minna, which in itself could hardly be considered as
a breach of faith towards me, since it had ended in a decided repulse of my
rival’s courtship in my favour. But the fact of this episode having been kept
Page 146
so secret that I had not had the faintest idea of it before, and also the
suspicion I could not avoid harbouring that Minna’s comfortable
circumstances were in part due to this man’s friendship, filled me with
gloomy misgivings. But as I have said, although I could find no real cause
to complain of infidelity, I was distracted and alarmed, and was at last
driven to the half-desperate resolve of regaining my balance in this respect
by obtaining complete possession of Minna. It seemed to me as though my
stability as a citizen as well as my professional success would be assured by
a recognised union with Minna. The two years spent in the theatrical world
had, in fact, kept me in a constant state of distraction, of which in my heart
of hearts I was most painfully conscious. I realised vaguely that I was on
the wrong path; I longed for peace and quiet, and hoped to find these most
effectually by getting married, and so putting an end to the state of things
that had become the source of so much anxiety to me.
It was not surprising that Laube noticed by my untidy, passionate, and
wasted appearance that something unusual was amiss with me. It was only
in his company, which I always found comforting, that I gained the only
impressions of Berlin which compensated me in any way for my
misfortunes. The most important artistic experience I had, came to me
through the performance of Ferdinand Cortez, conducted by Spontini
himself, the spirit of which astonished me more than anything I had ever
heard before. Though the actual production, especially as regards the chief
characters, who as a whole could not be regarded as belonging to the flower
of Berlin opera, left me unmoved, and though the effect never reached a
point that could be even distantly compared to that produced upon me by
Schroder-Devrient, yet the exceptional precision, fire, and richly organised
rendering of the whole was new to me. I gained a fresh insight into the
peculiar dignity of big theatrical representations, which in their several parts
could, by well-accentuated rhythm, be made to attain the highest pinnacle
of art. This extraordinarily distinct impression took a drastic hold of me,
and above all served to guide me in my conception of Rienzi, so that,
speaking from an artistic point of view, Berlin may be said to have left its
traces on my development.
For the present, however, my chief concern was to extricate myself from
my extremely helpless position. I was determined to turn my steps to
Königsberg, and communicated my decision, and the hopes founded upon
it, to Laube. This excellent friend, without further inquiry, made a point of
suspicion I could not avoid harbouring that Minna’s comfortable
circumstances were in part due to this man’s friendship, filled me with
gloomy misgivings. But as I have said, although I could find no real cause
to complain of infidelity, I was distracted and alarmed, and was at last
driven to the half-desperate resolve of regaining my balance in this respect
by obtaining complete possession of Minna. It seemed to me as though my
stability as a citizen as well as my professional success would be assured by
a recognised union with Minna. The two years spent in the theatrical world
had, in fact, kept me in a constant state of distraction, of which in my heart
of hearts I was most painfully conscious. I realised vaguely that I was on
the wrong path; I longed for peace and quiet, and hoped to find these most
effectually by getting married, and so putting an end to the state of things
that had become the source of so much anxiety to me.
It was not surprising that Laube noticed by my untidy, passionate, and
wasted appearance that something unusual was amiss with me. It was only
in his company, which I always found comforting, that I gained the only
impressions of Berlin which compensated me in any way for my
misfortunes. The most important artistic experience I had, came to me
through the performance of Ferdinand Cortez, conducted by Spontini
himself, the spirit of which astonished me more than anything I had ever
heard before. Though the actual production, especially as regards the chief
characters, who as a whole could not be regarded as belonging to the flower
of Berlin opera, left me unmoved, and though the effect never reached a
point that could be even distantly compared to that produced upon me by
Schroder-Devrient, yet the exceptional precision, fire, and richly organised
rendering of the whole was new to me. I gained a fresh insight into the
peculiar dignity of big theatrical representations, which in their several parts
could, by well-accentuated rhythm, be made to attain the highest pinnacle
of art. This extraordinarily distinct impression took a drastic hold of me,
and above all served to guide me in my conception of Rienzi, so that,
speaking from an artistic point of view, Berlin may be said to have left its
traces on my development.
For the present, however, my chief concern was to extricate myself from
my extremely helpless position. I was determined to turn my steps to
Königsberg, and communicated my decision, and the hopes founded upon
it, to Laube. This excellent friend, without further inquiry, made a point of
Page 147
exerting his energies to free me from my present state of despair, and to
help me to reach my next destination, an object which, through the
assistance of several of his friends, he succeeded in accomplishing. When
he said good-bye to me, Laube with sympathetic foresight warned me,
should I succeed in my desired career of musical conductor, not to allow
myself to be entangled in the shallowness of stage life, and advised me,
after fatiguing rehearsals, instead of going to my sweetheart, to take a
serious book in hand, in order that my greater gifts might not go
uncultivated. I did not tell him that by taking an early and decisive step in
this direction I intended to protect myself effectually against the dangers of
theatrical intrigues. On the 7th of July, therefore, I started on what was at
that time an extremely troublesome and fatiguing journey to the distant
town of Königsberg.
It seemed to me as though I were leaving the world, as I travelled on day
after day through the desert marches. Then followed a sad and humiliating
impression of Königsberg, where, in one of the poorest-looking suburbs,
Tragheim, near the theatre, and in a lane such as one would expect to find in
a village, I found the ugly house in which Minna lodged. The friendly and
quiet kindness of manner, however, which was peculiar to her, soon made
me feel at home. She was popular at the theatre, and was respected by the
managers and actors, a fact which seemed to augur well for her betrothed,
the part I was now openly to assume.
Though as yet there seemed no distinct prospect of my getting the
appointment I had come for, yet we agreed that I could hold out a little
longer, and that the matter would certainly be arranged in the end. This was
also the opinion of the eccentric Abraham Möller, a worthy citizen of
Königsberg, who was devoted to the theatre, and who took a very friendly
interest in Minna, and finally also in me. This man, who was already well
advanced in life, belonged to the type of theatre lovers now probably
completely extinct in Germany, but of whom so much is recorded in the
history of actors of earlier times. One could not spend an hour in the
company of this man, who at one time had gone in for the most reckless
speculations, without having to listen to his account of the glory of the stage
in former times, described in most lively terms. As a man of means he had
at one time made the acquaintance of nearly all the great actors and
actresses of his day, and had even known how to win their friendship.
Through too great a liberality he unfortunately found himself in reduced
help me to reach my next destination, an object which, through the
assistance of several of his friends, he succeeded in accomplishing. When
he said good-bye to me, Laube with sympathetic foresight warned me,
should I succeed in my desired career of musical conductor, not to allow
myself to be entangled in the shallowness of stage life, and advised me,
after fatiguing rehearsals, instead of going to my sweetheart, to take a
serious book in hand, in order that my greater gifts might not go
uncultivated. I did not tell him that by taking an early and decisive step in
this direction I intended to protect myself effectually against the dangers of
theatrical intrigues. On the 7th of July, therefore, I started on what was at
that time an extremely troublesome and fatiguing journey to the distant
town of Königsberg.
It seemed to me as though I were leaving the world, as I travelled on day
after day through the desert marches. Then followed a sad and humiliating
impression of Königsberg, where, in one of the poorest-looking suburbs,
Tragheim, near the theatre, and in a lane such as one would expect to find in
a village, I found the ugly house in which Minna lodged. The friendly and
quiet kindness of manner, however, which was peculiar to her, soon made
me feel at home. She was popular at the theatre, and was respected by the
managers and actors, a fact which seemed to augur well for her betrothed,
the part I was now openly to assume.
Though as yet there seemed no distinct prospect of my getting the
appointment I had come for, yet we agreed that I could hold out a little
longer, and that the matter would certainly be arranged in the end. This was
also the opinion of the eccentric Abraham Möller, a worthy citizen of
Königsberg, who was devoted to the theatre, and who took a very friendly
interest in Minna, and finally also in me. This man, who was already well
advanced in life, belonged to the type of theatre lovers now probably
completely extinct in Germany, but of whom so much is recorded in the
history of actors of earlier times. One could not spend an hour in the
company of this man, who at one time had gone in for the most reckless
speculations, without having to listen to his account of the glory of the stage
in former times, described in most lively terms. As a man of means he had
at one time made the acquaintance of nearly all the great actors and
actresses of his day, and had even known how to win their friendship.
Through too great a liberality he unfortunately found himself in reduced
Page 148
circumstances, and was now obliged to procure the means to satisfy his
craving for the theatre and his desire to protect those belonging to it by
entering into all kinds of strange business transactions, in which, without
running any real risk, he felt there was something to be gained. He was
accordingly only able to afford the theatre a very meagre support, but one
which was quite in keeping with its decrepit condition.
This strange man, of whom the theatre director, Anton Hubsch, stood to a
certain extent in awe, undertook to procure me my appointment. The only
circumstance against me was the fact that Louis Schubert, the famous
musician whom I had known from very early times as the first violoncellist
of the Magdeburg orchestra, had come to Königsberg from Riga, where the
theatre had been closed for a time, and where he had left his wife, in order
to fill the post of musical conductor here until the new theatre in Riga was
opened, and he could return. The reopening of the Riga theatre, which had
already been fixed for the Easter of this year, had been postponed, and he
was now anxious not to leave Königsberg. Since Schubert was a thorough
master in his art, and since his choosing to remain or go depended entirely
on circumstances over which he had no control, the theatre director found
himself in the embarrassing position of having to secure some one who
would be willing to wait to enter upon his appointment till Schubert’s
business called him away. Consequently a young musical conductor who
was anxious to remain in Königsberg at any price could but be heartily
welcomed as a reserve and substitute in case of emergency. Indeed, the
director declared himself willing to give me a small retaining fee till the
time should arrive for my definite entrance upon my duties.
Schubert, on the contrary, was furious at my arrival; there was no longer
any necessity for his speedy return to Riga, since the reopening of the
theatre there had been postponed indefinitely. Moreover, he had a special
interest in remaining in Königsberg, as he had conceived a passion for the
prima donna there, which considerably lessened his desire to return to his
wife. So at the last moment he clung to his Königsberg post with great
eagerness, regarded me as his deadly enemy, and, spurred on by his instinct
of self-preservation, used every means in his power to make my stay in
Königsberg, and the already painful position I occupied while awaiting his
departure, a veritable hell to me.
craving for the theatre and his desire to protect those belonging to it by
entering into all kinds of strange business transactions, in which, without
running any real risk, he felt there was something to be gained. He was
accordingly only able to afford the theatre a very meagre support, but one
which was quite in keeping with its decrepit condition.
This strange man, of whom the theatre director, Anton Hubsch, stood to a
certain extent in awe, undertook to procure me my appointment. The only
circumstance against me was the fact that Louis Schubert, the famous
musician whom I had known from very early times as the first violoncellist
of the Magdeburg orchestra, had come to Königsberg from Riga, where the
theatre had been closed for a time, and where he had left his wife, in order
to fill the post of musical conductor here until the new theatre in Riga was
opened, and he could return. The reopening of the Riga theatre, which had
already been fixed for the Easter of this year, had been postponed, and he
was now anxious not to leave Königsberg. Since Schubert was a thorough
master in his art, and since his choosing to remain or go depended entirely
on circumstances over which he had no control, the theatre director found
himself in the embarrassing position of having to secure some one who
would be willing to wait to enter upon his appointment till Schubert’s
business called him away. Consequently a young musical conductor who
was anxious to remain in Königsberg at any price could but be heartily
welcomed as a reserve and substitute in case of emergency. Indeed, the
director declared himself willing to give me a small retaining fee till the
time should arrive for my definite entrance upon my duties.
Schubert, on the contrary, was furious at my arrival; there was no longer
any necessity for his speedy return to Riga, since the reopening of the
theatre there had been postponed indefinitely. Moreover, he had a special
interest in remaining in Königsberg, as he had conceived a passion for the
prima donna there, which considerably lessened his desire to return to his
wife. So at the last moment he clung to his Königsberg post with great
eagerness, regarded me as his deadly enemy, and, spurred on by his instinct
of self-preservation, used every means in his power to make my stay in
Königsberg, and the already painful position I occupied while awaiting his
departure, a veritable hell to me.
Page 149
While in Magdeburg I had been on the friendliest footing with both
musicians and singers, and had been shown the greatest consideration by
the public, I here found I had to defend myself on all sides against the most
mortifying ill-will. This hostility towards me, which soon made itself
apparent, contributed in no small degree to make me feel as though in
coming to Königsberg I had gone into exile. In spite of my eagerness, I
realised that under the circumstances my marriage with Minna would prove
a hazardous undertaking. At the beginning of August the company went to
Memel for a time, to open the summer season there, and I followed Minna a
few days later. We went most of the way by sea, and crossed the Kurische
Haff in a sailing vessel in bad weather with the wind against us—one of the
most melancholy crossings I have ever experienced. As we passed the thin
strip of sand that divides this bay from the Baltic Sea, the castle of
Runsitten, where Hoffmann laid the scene of one of his most gruesome tales
(Das Majorat), was pointed out to me. The fact that in this desolate
neighbourhood, of all places in the world, I should after so long a lapse of
time be once more brought in contact with the fantastic impressions of my
youth, had a singular and depressing effect on my mind. The unhappy
sojourn in Memel, the lamentable role I played there, everything in short,
contributed to make me find my only consolation in Minna, who, after all,
was the cause of my having placed myself in this unpleasant position. Our
friend Abraham followed us from Königsberg and did all kinds of queer
things to promote my interests, and was obviously anxious to put the
director and conductor at variance with each other. One day Schubert, in
consequence of a dispute with Hubsch on the previous night, actually
declared himself too unwell to attend a rehearsal of Euryanthe, in order to
force the manager to summon me suddenly to take his place. In doing this
my rival maliciously hoped that as I was totally unprepared to conduct this
difficult opera, which was seldom played, I would expose my incapacity in
a manner most welcome to his hostile intentions. Although I had never
really had a score of Euryanthe before me, his wish was so little gratified,
that he elected to get well for the representation in order to conduct it
himself, which he would not have done if it had been found necessary to
cancel the performance on account of my incompetence. In this wretched
position, vexed in mind, exposed to the severe climate, which even on
summer evenings struck me as horribly cold, and occupied merely in
warding off the most painful troubles of life, my time, as far as any
musicians and singers, and had been shown the greatest consideration by
the public, I here found I had to defend myself on all sides against the most
mortifying ill-will. This hostility towards me, which soon made itself
apparent, contributed in no small degree to make me feel as though in
coming to Königsberg I had gone into exile. In spite of my eagerness, I
realised that under the circumstances my marriage with Minna would prove
a hazardous undertaking. At the beginning of August the company went to
Memel for a time, to open the summer season there, and I followed Minna a
few days later. We went most of the way by sea, and crossed the Kurische
Haff in a sailing vessel in bad weather with the wind against us—one of the
most melancholy crossings I have ever experienced. As we passed the thin
strip of sand that divides this bay from the Baltic Sea, the castle of
Runsitten, where Hoffmann laid the scene of one of his most gruesome tales
(Das Majorat), was pointed out to me. The fact that in this desolate
neighbourhood, of all places in the world, I should after so long a lapse of
time be once more brought in contact with the fantastic impressions of my
youth, had a singular and depressing effect on my mind. The unhappy
sojourn in Memel, the lamentable role I played there, everything in short,
contributed to make me find my only consolation in Minna, who, after all,
was the cause of my having placed myself in this unpleasant position. Our
friend Abraham followed us from Königsberg and did all kinds of queer
things to promote my interests, and was obviously anxious to put the
director and conductor at variance with each other. One day Schubert, in
consequence of a dispute with Hubsch on the previous night, actually
declared himself too unwell to attend a rehearsal of Euryanthe, in order to
force the manager to summon me suddenly to take his place. In doing this
my rival maliciously hoped that as I was totally unprepared to conduct this
difficult opera, which was seldom played, I would expose my incapacity in
a manner most welcome to his hostile intentions. Although I had never
really had a score of Euryanthe before me, his wish was so little gratified,
that he elected to get well for the representation in order to conduct it
himself, which he would not have done if it had been found necessary to
cancel the performance on account of my incompetence. In this wretched
position, vexed in mind, exposed to the severe climate, which even on
summer evenings struck me as horribly cold, and occupied merely in
warding off the most painful troubles of life, my time, as far as any
Page 150
professional advancement was concerned, was completely lost. At last, on
our return to Königsberg, and particularly under the guardianship of Möller,
the question as to what was to be done was more earnestly considered.
Finally, Minna and I were offered a fairly good engagement in Danzig,
through the influence of my brother-in-law Wolfram and his wife, who had
gone there.
Möller seized this opportunity to induce the director Hubsch, who was
anxious not to lose Minna, to sign a contract including us both, and by
which it was understood that under any circumstances I should be officially
appointed as conductor at his theatre from the following Easter. Moreover,
for our wedding, a benefit performance was promised, for which we chose
Die Stumme von Portici, to be conducted by me in person. For, as Möller
remarked, it was absolutely necessary for us to get married, and to have a
due celebration of the event; there was no getting out of it. Minna made no
objection, and all my past endeavours and resolutions seemed to prove that
my one desire was to take anchor in the haven of matrimony. In spite of
this, however, a strange conflict was going on within me at this time. I had
become sufficiently intimate with Minna’s life and character to realise the
wide difference between our two natures as fully as the important step I was
about to take necessitated; but my powers of judgment were not yet
sufficiently matured.
My future wife was the child of poor parents, natives of Oederan in the
Erzgebirge in Saxony. Her father was no ordinary man; he possessed
enormous vitality, but in his old age showed traces of some feebleness of
mind. In his young days he had been a trumpeter in Saxony, and in this
capacity had taken part in a campaign against the French, and had also been
present at the battle of Wagram. He afterwards became a mechanic, and
took up the trade of manufacturing cards for carding wool, and as he
invented an improvement in the process of their production, he is said to
have made a very good business of it for some time. A rich manufacturer of
Chemnitz once gave him a large order to be delivered at the end of the year:
the children, whose pliable fingers had already proved serviceable in this
respect, had to work hard day and night, and in return the father promised
them an exceptionally happy Christmas, as he expected to get a large sum
of money. When the longed-for time arrived, however, he received the
announcement of his client’s bankruptcy. The goods that had already been
delivered were lost, and the material that remained on his hands there was
our return to Königsberg, and particularly under the guardianship of Möller,
the question as to what was to be done was more earnestly considered.
Finally, Minna and I were offered a fairly good engagement in Danzig,
through the influence of my brother-in-law Wolfram and his wife, who had
gone there.
Möller seized this opportunity to induce the director Hubsch, who was
anxious not to lose Minna, to sign a contract including us both, and by
which it was understood that under any circumstances I should be officially
appointed as conductor at his theatre from the following Easter. Moreover,
for our wedding, a benefit performance was promised, for which we chose
Die Stumme von Portici, to be conducted by me in person. For, as Möller
remarked, it was absolutely necessary for us to get married, and to have a
due celebration of the event; there was no getting out of it. Minna made no
objection, and all my past endeavours and resolutions seemed to prove that
my one desire was to take anchor in the haven of matrimony. In spite of
this, however, a strange conflict was going on within me at this time. I had
become sufficiently intimate with Minna’s life and character to realise the
wide difference between our two natures as fully as the important step I was
about to take necessitated; but my powers of judgment were not yet
sufficiently matured.
My future wife was the child of poor parents, natives of Oederan in the
Erzgebirge in Saxony. Her father was no ordinary man; he possessed
enormous vitality, but in his old age showed traces of some feebleness of
mind. In his young days he had been a trumpeter in Saxony, and in this
capacity had taken part in a campaign against the French, and had also been
present at the battle of Wagram. He afterwards became a mechanic, and
took up the trade of manufacturing cards for carding wool, and as he
invented an improvement in the process of their production, he is said to
have made a very good business of it for some time. A rich manufacturer of
Chemnitz once gave him a large order to be delivered at the end of the year:
the children, whose pliable fingers had already proved serviceable in this
respect, had to work hard day and night, and in return the father promised
them an exceptionally happy Christmas, as he expected to get a large sum
of money. When the longed-for time arrived, however, he received the
announcement of his client’s bankruptcy. The goods that had already been
delivered were lost, and the material that remained on his hands there was
Page 151
no prospect of selling. The family never succeeded in recovering from the
state of confusion into which this misfortune had thrown them; they went to
Dresden, where the father hoped to find remunerative employment as a
skilled mechanic, especially in the manufacture of pianos, of which he
supplied separate parts. He also brought away with him a large quantity of
the fine wire which had been destined for the manufacture of the cards, and
which he hoped to be able to sell at a profit. The ten-year-old Minna was
commissioned to sell separate lots of it to the milliners for making flowers.
She would set out with a heavy basketful of wire, and had such a gift for
persuading people to buy that she soon disposed of the whole supply to the
best advantage. From this time the desire was awakened in her to be of
active use to her impoverished family, and to earn her own living as soon as
possible, in order not to be a burden on her parents. As she grew up and
developed into a strikingly beautiful woman, she attracted the attention of
men at a very early age. A certain Herr von Einsiedel fell passionately in
love with her, and took advantage of the inexperienced young girl when she
was off her guard. Her family was thrown into the utmost consternation,
and only her mother and elder sister could be told of the terrible position in
which Minna found herself. Her father, from whose anger the worst
consequences were to be feared, was never informed that his barely
seventeen-year-old daughter had become a mother, and under conditions
that had threatened her life, had given birth to a girl. Minna, who could
obtain no redress from her seducer, now felt doubly called upon to earn her
own livelihood and leave her father’s house. Through the influence of
friends, she had been brought into contact with an amateur theatrical
society: while acting in a performance given there, she attracted the notice
of members of the Royal Court Theatre, and in particular drew the attention
of the director of the Dessau Court Theatre, who was present, and who
immediately offered her an engagement. She gladly caught at this way of
escape from her trying position, as it opened up the possibility of a brilliant
stage career, and of some day being able to provide amply for her family.
She had not the slightest passion for the stage, and utterly devoid as she was
of any levity or coquetry, she merely saw in a theatrical career the means of
earning a quick, and possibly even a rich, livelihood. Without any artistic
training, the theatre merely meant for her the company of actors and
actresses. Whether she pleased or not seemed of importance in her eyes
only in so far as it affected her realisation of a comfortable independence.
state of confusion into which this misfortune had thrown them; they went to
Dresden, where the father hoped to find remunerative employment as a
skilled mechanic, especially in the manufacture of pianos, of which he
supplied separate parts. He also brought away with him a large quantity of
the fine wire which had been destined for the manufacture of the cards, and
which he hoped to be able to sell at a profit. The ten-year-old Minna was
commissioned to sell separate lots of it to the milliners for making flowers.
She would set out with a heavy basketful of wire, and had such a gift for
persuading people to buy that she soon disposed of the whole supply to the
best advantage. From this time the desire was awakened in her to be of
active use to her impoverished family, and to earn her own living as soon as
possible, in order not to be a burden on her parents. As she grew up and
developed into a strikingly beautiful woman, she attracted the attention of
men at a very early age. A certain Herr von Einsiedel fell passionately in
love with her, and took advantage of the inexperienced young girl when she
was off her guard. Her family was thrown into the utmost consternation,
and only her mother and elder sister could be told of the terrible position in
which Minna found herself. Her father, from whose anger the worst
consequences were to be feared, was never informed that his barely
seventeen-year-old daughter had become a mother, and under conditions
that had threatened her life, had given birth to a girl. Minna, who could
obtain no redress from her seducer, now felt doubly called upon to earn her
own livelihood and leave her father’s house. Through the influence of
friends, she had been brought into contact with an amateur theatrical
society: while acting in a performance given there, she attracted the notice
of members of the Royal Court Theatre, and in particular drew the attention
of the director of the Dessau Court Theatre, who was present, and who
immediately offered her an engagement. She gladly caught at this way of
escape from her trying position, as it opened up the possibility of a brilliant
stage career, and of some day being able to provide amply for her family.
She had not the slightest passion for the stage, and utterly devoid as she was
of any levity or coquetry, she merely saw in a theatrical career the means of
earning a quick, and possibly even a rich, livelihood. Without any artistic
training, the theatre merely meant for her the company of actors and
actresses. Whether she pleased or not seemed of importance in her eyes
only in so far as it affected her realisation of a comfortable independence.
Page 152
To use all the means at her disposal to assure this end seemed to her as
necessary as it is for a tradesman to expose his goods to the best advantage.
The friendship of the director, manager, and favourite members of the
theatre she regarded as indispensable, whilst those frequenters of the theatre
who, through their criticism or taste, influenced the public, and thus also
had weight with the management, she recognised as beings upon whom the
attainment of her most fervent desires depended. Never to make enemies of
them appeared so natural and so necessary that, in order to maintain her
popularity, she was prepared to sacrifice even her self-respect. She had in
this way created for herself a certain peculiar code of behaviour, that on the
one hand prompted her to avoid scandals, but on the other hand found
excuses even for making herself conspicuous as long as she herself knew
that she was doing nothing wrong. Hence arose a mixture of
inconsistencies, the questionable sense of which she was incapable of
grasping. It was clearly impossible for her not to lose all real sense of
delicacy; she showed, however, a sense of the fitness of things, which made
her have regard to what was considered proper, though she could not
understand that mere appearances were a mockery when they only served to
cloak the absence of a real sense of delicacy. As she was without idealism,
she had no artistic feeling; neither did she possess any talent for acting, and
her power of pleasing was due entirely to her charming appearance.
Whether in time routine would have made her become a good actress it is
impossible for me to say. The strange power she exercised over me from the
very first was in no wise due to the fact that I regarded her in any way as
the embodiment of my ideal; on the contrary, she attracted me by the
soberness and seriousness of her character, which supplemented what I felt
to be wanting in my own, and afforded me the support that in my
wanderings after the ideal I knew to be necessary for me.
I had soon accustomed myself never to betray my craving after the ideal
before Minna: unable to account for this even to myself, I always made a
point of avoiding the subject by passing it over with a laugh and a joke; but,
on this account, it was all the more natural for me to feel qualms when fears
arose in my mind as to her really possessing the qualities to which I had
attributed her superiority over me. Her strange tolerance with regard to
certain familiarities and even importunities on the part of patrons of the
theatre, directed even against her person, hurt me considerably; and on my
reproaching her for this, I was driven to despair by her assuming an injured
necessary as it is for a tradesman to expose his goods to the best advantage.
The friendship of the director, manager, and favourite members of the
theatre she regarded as indispensable, whilst those frequenters of the theatre
who, through their criticism or taste, influenced the public, and thus also
had weight with the management, she recognised as beings upon whom the
attainment of her most fervent desires depended. Never to make enemies of
them appeared so natural and so necessary that, in order to maintain her
popularity, she was prepared to sacrifice even her self-respect. She had in
this way created for herself a certain peculiar code of behaviour, that on the
one hand prompted her to avoid scandals, but on the other hand found
excuses even for making herself conspicuous as long as she herself knew
that she was doing nothing wrong. Hence arose a mixture of
inconsistencies, the questionable sense of which she was incapable of
grasping. It was clearly impossible for her not to lose all real sense of
delicacy; she showed, however, a sense of the fitness of things, which made
her have regard to what was considered proper, though she could not
understand that mere appearances were a mockery when they only served to
cloak the absence of a real sense of delicacy. As she was without idealism,
she had no artistic feeling; neither did she possess any talent for acting, and
her power of pleasing was due entirely to her charming appearance.
Whether in time routine would have made her become a good actress it is
impossible for me to say. The strange power she exercised over me from the
very first was in no wise due to the fact that I regarded her in any way as
the embodiment of my ideal; on the contrary, she attracted me by the
soberness and seriousness of her character, which supplemented what I felt
to be wanting in my own, and afforded me the support that in my
wanderings after the ideal I knew to be necessary for me.
I had soon accustomed myself never to betray my craving after the ideal
before Minna: unable to account for this even to myself, I always made a
point of avoiding the subject by passing it over with a laugh and a joke; but,
on this account, it was all the more natural for me to feel qualms when fears
arose in my mind as to her really possessing the qualities to which I had
attributed her superiority over me. Her strange tolerance with regard to
certain familiarities and even importunities on the part of patrons of the
theatre, directed even against her person, hurt me considerably; and on my
reproaching her for this, I was driven to despair by her assuming an injured
Page 153
expression as though I had insulted her. It was quite by chance that I came
across Schwabe’s letters, and thus gained an astonishing insight into her
intimacy with that man, of which she had left me in ignorance, and allowed
me to gain my first knowledge during my stay in Berlin. All my latent
jealousy, all my inmost doubts concerning Minna’s character, found vent in
my sudden determination to leave the girl at once. There was a violent
scene between us, which was typical of all our subsequent altercations. I
had obviously gone too far in treating a woman who was not passionately in
love with me, as if I had a real right over her; for, after all, she had merely
yielded to my importunity, and in no way belonged to me. To add to my
perplexity, Minna only needed to remind me that from a worldly point of
view she had refused very good offers in order to give way to the
impetuosity of a penniless young man, whose talent had not yet been put to
any real test, and to whom she had nevertheless shown sympathy and
kindness.
What she could least forgive in me was the raging vehemence with which
I spoke, and by which she felt so insulted, that upon realising to what
excesses I had gone, there was nothing I could do but try and pacify her by
owning myself in the wrong, and begging her forgiveness. Such was the end
of this and all subsequent scenes, outwardly; at least, always to her
advantage. But peace was undermined for ever, and by the frequent
recurrence of such quarrels, Minna’s character underwent a considerable
change. Just as in later times she became perplexed by what she considered
my incomprehensible conception of art and its proportions, which upset her
ideas about everything connected with it, so now she grew more and more
confused by my greater delicacy in regard to morality, which was very
different from hers, especially as in many other respects I displayed a
freedom of opinion which the could neither comprehend nor approve.
A feeling of passionate resentment was accordingly roused in her
otherwise tranquil disposition. It was not surprising that this resentment
increased as the years went on, and manifested itself in a manner
characteristic of a girl sprung from the lower middle class, in whom mere
superficial polish had taken the place of any true culture. The real torment
of our subsequent life together lay in the fact that, owing to her violence, I
had lost the last support I had hitherto found in her exceptionally sweet
disposition. At that time I was filled only with a dim foreboding of the
fateful step I was taking in marrying her. Her agreeable and soothing
across Schwabe’s letters, and thus gained an astonishing insight into her
intimacy with that man, of which she had left me in ignorance, and allowed
me to gain my first knowledge during my stay in Berlin. All my latent
jealousy, all my inmost doubts concerning Minna’s character, found vent in
my sudden determination to leave the girl at once. There was a violent
scene between us, which was typical of all our subsequent altercations. I
had obviously gone too far in treating a woman who was not passionately in
love with me, as if I had a real right over her; for, after all, she had merely
yielded to my importunity, and in no way belonged to me. To add to my
perplexity, Minna only needed to remind me that from a worldly point of
view she had refused very good offers in order to give way to the
impetuosity of a penniless young man, whose talent had not yet been put to
any real test, and to whom she had nevertheless shown sympathy and
kindness.
What she could least forgive in me was the raging vehemence with which
I spoke, and by which she felt so insulted, that upon realising to what
excesses I had gone, there was nothing I could do but try and pacify her by
owning myself in the wrong, and begging her forgiveness. Such was the end
of this and all subsequent scenes, outwardly; at least, always to her
advantage. But peace was undermined for ever, and by the frequent
recurrence of such quarrels, Minna’s character underwent a considerable
change. Just as in later times she became perplexed by what she considered
my incomprehensible conception of art and its proportions, which upset her
ideas about everything connected with it, so now she grew more and more
confused by my greater delicacy in regard to morality, which was very
different from hers, especially as in many other respects I displayed a
freedom of opinion which the could neither comprehend nor approve.
A feeling of passionate resentment was accordingly roused in her
otherwise tranquil disposition. It was not surprising that this resentment
increased as the years went on, and manifested itself in a manner
characteristic of a girl sprung from the lower middle class, in whom mere
superficial polish had taken the place of any true culture. The real torment
of our subsequent life together lay in the fact that, owing to her violence, I
had lost the last support I had hitherto found in her exceptionally sweet
disposition. At that time I was filled only with a dim foreboding of the
fateful step I was taking in marrying her. Her agreeable and soothing
Page 154
qualities still had such a beneficial effect upon me, that with the frivolity
natural to me, as well as the obstinacy with which I met all opposition, I
silenced the inner voice that darkly foreboded disaster.
Since my journey to Königsberg I had broken off all communication with
my family, that is to say, with my mother and Rosalie, and I told no one of
the step I had decided to take. Under my old friend Möller’s audacious
guidance I overcame all the legal difficulties that stood in the way of our
union. According to Prussian law, a man who has reached his majority no
longer requires his parents’ consent to his marriage: but since, according to
this same provision, I was not yet of age, I had recourse to the law of
Saxony, to which country I belonged by birth, and by whose regulations I
had already attained my majority at the age of twenty-one. Our banns had to
be published at the place where we had been living during the past year, and
this formality was carried out in Magdeburg without any further objections
being raised. As Minna’s parents had given their consent, the only thing that
still remained to be done to make everything quite in order was for us to go
together to the clergyman of the parish of Tragheim. This proved a strange
enough visit. It took place the morning preceding the performance to be
given for our benefit, in which Minna had chosen, the pantomimic role of
Fenella; her costume was not ready yet, and there was still a great deal to be
done. The rainy cold November weather made us feel out of humour, when,
to add to our vexation, we were kept standing in the hall of the vicarage for
an unreasonable time. Then an altercation arose between us which speedily
led to such bitter vituperation that we were just on the point of separating
and going each our own way, when the clergyman opened the door. Not a
little embarrassed at having surprised us in the act of quarrelling, he invited
us in. We were obliged to put a good face on the matter, however; and the
absurdity of the situation so tickled our sense of humour that we laughed;
the parson was appeased, and the wedding fixed for eleven o’clock the next
morning.
Another fruitful source of irritation, which often led to the outbreak of
violent quarrelling between us, was the arrangement of our future home, in
the interior comfort and beauty of which I hoped to find a guarantee of
happiness. The economical ideas of my bride filled me with impatience. I
was determined that the inauguration of a series of prosperous years which I
saw before me must be celebrated by a correspondingly comfortable home.
Furniture, household utensils, and all necessaries were obtained on credit, to
natural to me, as well as the obstinacy with which I met all opposition, I
silenced the inner voice that darkly foreboded disaster.
Since my journey to Königsberg I had broken off all communication with
my family, that is to say, with my mother and Rosalie, and I told no one of
the step I had decided to take. Under my old friend Möller’s audacious
guidance I overcame all the legal difficulties that stood in the way of our
union. According to Prussian law, a man who has reached his majority no
longer requires his parents’ consent to his marriage: but since, according to
this same provision, I was not yet of age, I had recourse to the law of
Saxony, to which country I belonged by birth, and by whose regulations I
had already attained my majority at the age of twenty-one. Our banns had to
be published at the place where we had been living during the past year, and
this formality was carried out in Magdeburg without any further objections
being raised. As Minna’s parents had given their consent, the only thing that
still remained to be done to make everything quite in order was for us to go
together to the clergyman of the parish of Tragheim. This proved a strange
enough visit. It took place the morning preceding the performance to be
given for our benefit, in which Minna had chosen, the pantomimic role of
Fenella; her costume was not ready yet, and there was still a great deal to be
done. The rainy cold November weather made us feel out of humour, when,
to add to our vexation, we were kept standing in the hall of the vicarage for
an unreasonable time. Then an altercation arose between us which speedily
led to such bitter vituperation that we were just on the point of separating
and going each our own way, when the clergyman opened the door. Not a
little embarrassed at having surprised us in the act of quarrelling, he invited
us in. We were obliged to put a good face on the matter, however; and the
absurdity of the situation so tickled our sense of humour that we laughed;
the parson was appeased, and the wedding fixed for eleven o’clock the next
morning.
Another fruitful source of irritation, which often led to the outbreak of
violent quarrelling between us, was the arrangement of our future home, in
the interior comfort and beauty of which I hoped to find a guarantee of
happiness. The economical ideas of my bride filled me with impatience. I
was determined that the inauguration of a series of prosperous years which I
saw before me must be celebrated by a correspondingly comfortable home.
Furniture, household utensils, and all necessaries were obtained on credit, to
Page 155
be paid for by instalment. There was, of course, no question of a dowry, a
wedding outfit, or any of the things that are generally considered
indispensable to a well-founded establishment. Our witnesses and guests
were drawn from the company of actors accidentally brought together by
their engagement at the Königsberg theatre. My friend Möller made us a
present of a silver sugar-basin, which was supplemented by a silver cake-
basket from another stage friend, a peculiar and, as far as I can remember,
rather interesting young man named Ernst Castell. The benefit performance
of the Die Stumme von Portici, which I conducted with great enthusiasm,
went off well, and brought us in as large a sum as we had counted upon.
After spending the rest of the day before our wedding very quietly, as we
were tired out after our return from the theatre, I took up my abode for the
first time in our new home. Not wishing to use the bridal bed, decorated for
the occasion, I lay down on a hard sofa, without even sufficient covering on
me, and froze valiantly while awaiting the happiness of the following day. I
was pleasantly excited the next morning by the arrival of Minna’s
belongings, packed in boxes and baskets. The weather, too, had quite
cleared up, and the sun was shining brightly; only our sitting-room refused
to get properly warm, which for some time drew down Minna’s reproaches
upon my head for my supposed carelessness in not having seen to the
heating arrangements. At last I dressed myself in my new suit, a dark blue
frock-coat with gold buttons. The carriage drove up, and I set out to fetch
my bride. The bright sky had put us all in good spirits, and in the best of
humour I met Minna, who was dressed in a splendid gown chosen by me.
She greeted me with sincere cordiality and pleasure shining from her eyes;
and taking the fine weather as a good omen, we started off for what now
seemed to us a most cheerful wedding. We enjoyed the satisfaction of
seeing the church as over-crowded as if a brilliant theatrical representation
were being given; it was quite a difficult matter to make our way to the
altar, where a group no less worldly than the rest, consisting of our
witnesses, dressed in all their theatrical finery, were assembled to receive
us. There was not one real friend amongst all those present, for even our
strange old friend Möller was absent, because no suitable partner had been
found for him. I was not for a single moment insensible to the chilling
frivolity of the congregation, who seemed to impart their tone to the whole
ceremony. I listened like one in a dream to the nuptial address of the parson,
who, I was afterwards told, had had a share in producing the spirit of
wedding outfit, or any of the things that are generally considered
indispensable to a well-founded establishment. Our witnesses and guests
were drawn from the company of actors accidentally brought together by
their engagement at the Königsberg theatre. My friend Möller made us a
present of a silver sugar-basin, which was supplemented by a silver cake-
basket from another stage friend, a peculiar and, as far as I can remember,
rather interesting young man named Ernst Castell. The benefit performance
of the Die Stumme von Portici, which I conducted with great enthusiasm,
went off well, and brought us in as large a sum as we had counted upon.
After spending the rest of the day before our wedding very quietly, as we
were tired out after our return from the theatre, I took up my abode for the
first time in our new home. Not wishing to use the bridal bed, decorated for
the occasion, I lay down on a hard sofa, without even sufficient covering on
me, and froze valiantly while awaiting the happiness of the following day. I
was pleasantly excited the next morning by the arrival of Minna’s
belongings, packed in boxes and baskets. The weather, too, had quite
cleared up, and the sun was shining brightly; only our sitting-room refused
to get properly warm, which for some time drew down Minna’s reproaches
upon my head for my supposed carelessness in not having seen to the
heating arrangements. At last I dressed myself in my new suit, a dark blue
frock-coat with gold buttons. The carriage drove up, and I set out to fetch
my bride. The bright sky had put us all in good spirits, and in the best of
humour I met Minna, who was dressed in a splendid gown chosen by me.
She greeted me with sincere cordiality and pleasure shining from her eyes;
and taking the fine weather as a good omen, we started off for what now
seemed to us a most cheerful wedding. We enjoyed the satisfaction of
seeing the church as over-crowded as if a brilliant theatrical representation
were being given; it was quite a difficult matter to make our way to the
altar, where a group no less worldly than the rest, consisting of our
witnesses, dressed in all their theatrical finery, were assembled to receive
us. There was not one real friend amongst all those present, for even our
strange old friend Möller was absent, because no suitable partner had been
found for him. I was not for a single moment insensible to the chilling
frivolity of the congregation, who seemed to impart their tone to the whole
ceremony. I listened like one in a dream to the nuptial address of the parson,
who, I was afterwards told, had had a share in producing the spirit of
Page 156
bigotry which at this time was so prevalent in Königsberg, and which
exercised such a disquieting influence on its population.
A few days later I was told that a rumour had got about the town that I
had taken action against the parson for some gross insults contained in his
sermon; I did not quite see what was meant, but supposed that the
exaggerated report arose from a passage in his address which I in my
excitement had misunderstood. The preacher, in speaking of the dark days,
of which we were to expect our share, bade us look to an unknown friend,
and I glanced up inquiringly for further particulars of this mysterious and
influential patron who chose so strange a way of announcing himself.
Reproachfully, and with peculiar emphasis, the pastor then pronounced the
name of this unknown friend: Jesus. Now I was not in any way insulted by
this, as people imagined, but was simply disappointed; at the same time, I
thought that such exhortations were probably usual in nuptial addresses.
But, on the whole, I was so absent-minded during this ceremony, which
was double Dutch to me, that when the parson held out the closed prayer-
book for us to place our wedding rings upon, Minna had to nudge me
forcibly to make me follow her example.
At that moment I saw, as clearly as in a vision, my whole being divided
into two cross-currents that dragged me in different directions; the upper
one faced the sun and carried me onward like a dreamer, whilst the lower
one held my nature captive, a prey to some inexplicable fear. The
extraordinary levity with which I chased away the conviction which kept
forcing itself upon me, that I was committing a twofold sin, was amply
accounted for by the really genuine affection with which I looked upon the
young girl whose truly exceptional character (so rare in the environment in
which she had been placed) led her thus to bind herself to a young man
without any means of support. It was eleven o’clock on the morning of the
24th of November, 1836, and I was twenty-three and a half.
On the way home from church, and afterwards, my good spirits rose
superior to all my doubts.
Minna at once took upon herself the duty of receiving and entertaining
her guests. The table was spread, and a rich feast, at which Abraham Möller,
the energetic promoter of our marriage, also took part, although he had been
rather put out by his exclusion from the church ceremony, made up for the
exercised such a disquieting influence on its population.
A few days later I was told that a rumour had got about the town that I
had taken action against the parson for some gross insults contained in his
sermon; I did not quite see what was meant, but supposed that the
exaggerated report arose from a passage in his address which I in my
excitement had misunderstood. The preacher, in speaking of the dark days,
of which we were to expect our share, bade us look to an unknown friend,
and I glanced up inquiringly for further particulars of this mysterious and
influential patron who chose so strange a way of announcing himself.
Reproachfully, and with peculiar emphasis, the pastor then pronounced the
name of this unknown friend: Jesus. Now I was not in any way insulted by
this, as people imagined, but was simply disappointed; at the same time, I
thought that such exhortations were probably usual in nuptial addresses.
But, on the whole, I was so absent-minded during this ceremony, which
was double Dutch to me, that when the parson held out the closed prayer-
book for us to place our wedding rings upon, Minna had to nudge me
forcibly to make me follow her example.
At that moment I saw, as clearly as in a vision, my whole being divided
into two cross-currents that dragged me in different directions; the upper
one faced the sun and carried me onward like a dreamer, whilst the lower
one held my nature captive, a prey to some inexplicable fear. The
extraordinary levity with which I chased away the conviction which kept
forcing itself upon me, that I was committing a twofold sin, was amply
accounted for by the really genuine affection with which I looked upon the
young girl whose truly exceptional character (so rare in the environment in
which she had been placed) led her thus to bind herself to a young man
without any means of support. It was eleven o’clock on the morning of the
24th of November, 1836, and I was twenty-three and a half.
On the way home from church, and afterwards, my good spirits rose
superior to all my doubts.
Minna at once took upon herself the duty of receiving and entertaining
her guests. The table was spread, and a rich feast, at which Abraham Möller,
the energetic promoter of our marriage, also took part, although he had been
rather put out by his exclusion from the church ceremony, made up for the
Page 157
coldness of the room, which for a long time refused to get warm, to the
great distress of the young hostess.
Everything went off in the usual uneventful way. Nevertheless, I retained
my good spirits till the next morning, when I had to present myself at the
magistrate’s court to meet the demands of my creditors, which had been
forwarded to me from Magdeburg to Konigsburg.
My friend Möller, whom I had retained for my defence, had foolishly
advised me to meet my creditors’ demands by pleading infancy according to
the law of Prussia, at all events until actual assistance for the settlement of
the claims could be obtained.
The magistrate, to whom I stated this plea as I had been advised, was
astonished, being probably well aware of my marriage on the previous day,
which could only have taken place on the production of documentary proof
of my majority. I naturally only gained a brief respite by this manœuvre,
and the troubles which beset me for a long time afterwards had their origin
on the first day of my marriage.
During the period when I held no appointment at the theatre I suffered
various humiliations. Nevertheless, I thought it wise to make the most of
my leisure in the interests of my art, and I finished a few pieces, among
which was a grand overture on Rule Britannia.
When I was still in Berlin I had written the overture entitled Polonia,
which has already been mentioned in connection with the Polish festival.
Rule Britannia was a further and deliberate step in the direction of mass
effects; at the close a strong military band was to be added to the already
over-full orchestra, and I intended to have the whole thing performed at the
Musical Festival in Königsberg in the summer.
To these two overtures I added a supplement—an overture entitled
Napoleon. The point to which I devoted my chief attention was the
selection of the means for producing certain effects, and I carefully
considered whether I should express the annihilating stroke of fate that
befell the French Emperor in Russia by a beat on the tom-tom or not. I
believe it was to a great extent my scruples about the introduction of this
beat that prevented me from carrying out my plan just then.
On the other hand, the conclusions which I had reached regarding the ill-
success of Liebesverbot resulted in an operatic sketch in which the demands
made on the chorus and the staff of singers should be more in proportion to
great distress of the young hostess.
Everything went off in the usual uneventful way. Nevertheless, I retained
my good spirits till the next morning, when I had to present myself at the
magistrate’s court to meet the demands of my creditors, which had been
forwarded to me from Magdeburg to Konigsburg.
My friend Möller, whom I had retained for my defence, had foolishly
advised me to meet my creditors’ demands by pleading infancy according to
the law of Prussia, at all events until actual assistance for the settlement of
the claims could be obtained.
The magistrate, to whom I stated this plea as I had been advised, was
astonished, being probably well aware of my marriage on the previous day,
which could only have taken place on the production of documentary proof
of my majority. I naturally only gained a brief respite by this manœuvre,
and the troubles which beset me for a long time afterwards had their origin
on the first day of my marriage.
During the period when I held no appointment at the theatre I suffered
various humiliations. Nevertheless, I thought it wise to make the most of
my leisure in the interests of my art, and I finished a few pieces, among
which was a grand overture on Rule Britannia.
When I was still in Berlin I had written the overture entitled Polonia,
which has already been mentioned in connection with the Polish festival.
Rule Britannia was a further and deliberate step in the direction of mass
effects; at the close a strong military band was to be added to the already
over-full orchestra, and I intended to have the whole thing performed at the
Musical Festival in Königsberg in the summer.
To these two overtures I added a supplement—an overture entitled
Napoleon. The point to which I devoted my chief attention was the
selection of the means for producing certain effects, and I carefully
considered whether I should express the annihilating stroke of fate that
befell the French Emperor in Russia by a beat on the tom-tom or not. I
believe it was to a great extent my scruples about the introduction of this
beat that prevented me from carrying out my plan just then.
On the other hand, the conclusions which I had reached regarding the ill-
success of Liebesverbot resulted in an operatic sketch in which the demands
made on the chorus and the staff of singers should be more in proportion to
Page 158
the known capacity of the local company, as this small theatre was the only
one at my disposal.
A quaint tale from the Arabian Nights suggested the very subject for a
light work of this description, the title of which, if I remember rightly, was
Mannerlist grosser als Frauenlist (‘Man outwits Woman’).
I transplanted the story from Bagdad to a modern setting. A young
goldsmith offends the pride of a young woman by placing the above motto
on the sign over his shop; deeply veiled, she steps into his shop and asks
him, as he displays such excellent taste in his work, to express his opinion
on her own physical charms; he begins with her feet and her hands, and
finally, noticing his confusion, she removes the veil from her face. The
jeweller is carried away by her beauty, whereupon she complains to him
that her father, who has always kept her in the strictest seclusion, describes
her to all her suitors as an ugly monster, his object being, she imagines,
simply to keep her dowry. The young man swears that he will not be
frightened off by these foolish objections, should the father raise them
against his suit. No sooner said than done. The daughter of this peculiar old
gentleman is promised to the unsuspecting jeweller, and is brought to her
bridegroom as soon as he has signed the contract. He then sees that the
father has indeed spoken the truth, the real daughter being a perfect
scarecrow. The beautiful lady returns to the bridegroom to gloat over his
desperation, and promises to release him from his terrible marriage if he
will remove the motto from his signboard. At this point I departed from the
original, and continued as follows: The enraged jeweller is on the point of
tearing down his unfortunate signboard when a curious apparition leads him
to pause in the act. He sees a bear-leader in the street making his clumsy
beast dance, in whom the luckless lover recognises at a glance his own
father, from whom he has been parted by a hard fate.
He suppresses any sign of emotion, for in a flash a scheme occurs to him
by which he can utilise this discovery to free himself from the hated
marriage with the daughter of the proud old aristocrat.
He instructs the bear-leader to come that evening to the garden where the
solemn betrothal is to take place in the presence of the invited guests.
He then explains to his young enemy that he wishes to leave the
signboard up for the time being, as he still hopes to prove the truth of the
motto.
one at my disposal.
A quaint tale from the Arabian Nights suggested the very subject for a
light work of this description, the title of which, if I remember rightly, was
Mannerlist grosser als Frauenlist (‘Man outwits Woman’).
I transplanted the story from Bagdad to a modern setting. A young
goldsmith offends the pride of a young woman by placing the above motto
on the sign over his shop; deeply veiled, she steps into his shop and asks
him, as he displays such excellent taste in his work, to express his opinion
on her own physical charms; he begins with her feet and her hands, and
finally, noticing his confusion, she removes the veil from her face. The
jeweller is carried away by her beauty, whereupon she complains to him
that her father, who has always kept her in the strictest seclusion, describes
her to all her suitors as an ugly monster, his object being, she imagines,
simply to keep her dowry. The young man swears that he will not be
frightened off by these foolish objections, should the father raise them
against his suit. No sooner said than done. The daughter of this peculiar old
gentleman is promised to the unsuspecting jeweller, and is brought to her
bridegroom as soon as he has signed the contract. He then sees that the
father has indeed spoken the truth, the real daughter being a perfect
scarecrow. The beautiful lady returns to the bridegroom to gloat over his
desperation, and promises to release him from his terrible marriage if he
will remove the motto from his signboard. At this point I departed from the
original, and continued as follows: The enraged jeweller is on the point of
tearing down his unfortunate signboard when a curious apparition leads him
to pause in the act. He sees a bear-leader in the street making his clumsy
beast dance, in whom the luckless lover recognises at a glance his own
father, from whom he has been parted by a hard fate.
He suppresses any sign of emotion, for in a flash a scheme occurs to him
by which he can utilise this discovery to free himself from the hated
marriage with the daughter of the proud old aristocrat.
He instructs the bear-leader to come that evening to the garden where the
solemn betrothal is to take place in the presence of the invited guests.
He then explains to his young enemy that he wishes to leave the
signboard up for the time being, as he still hopes to prove the truth of the
motto.
Page 159
After the marriage contract, in which the young man arrogates to himself
all kinds of fictitious titles of nobility, has been read to the assembled
company (composed, say, of the elite of the noble immigrants at the time of
the French Revolution), there is heard suddenly the pipe of the bear-leader,
who enters the garden with his prancing beast. Angered by this trivial
diversion, the astonished company become indignant when the bridegroom,
giving free vent to his feelings, throws himself with tears of joy into the
arms of the bear-leader and loudly proclaims him as his long-lost father.
The consternation of the company becomes even greater, however, when
the bear itself embraces the man they supposed to be of noble birth, for the
beast is no less a person than his own brother in the flesh who, on the death
of the real bear, had donned its skin, thus enabling the poverty-stricken pair
to continue to earn their livelihood in the only way left to them. This public
disclosure of the bridegroom’s lowly origin at once dissolves the marriage,
and the young woman, declaring herself outwitted by man, offers her hand
in compensation to the released jeweller.
To this unassuming subject I gave the title of the Gluckliche
Barenfamilie, and provided it with a dialogue which afterwards met with
Holtei’s highest approval.
I was about to begin the music for it in a new light French style, but the
seriousness of my position, which grew more and more acute, prevented
further progress in my work.
In this respect my strained relations with the conductor of the theatre
were still a constant source of trouble. With neither the opportunity nor the
means to defend myself, I had to submit to being maligned and rendered an
object of suspicion on all sides by my rival, who remained master of the
field. The object of this was to disgust me with the idea of taking up my
appointment as musical conductor, for which the contract had been signed
for Easter. Though I did not lose my self-confidence, I suffered keenly from
the indignity and the depressing effect of this prolonged strain.
When at last, at the beginning of April, the moment arrived for the
musical conductor Schubert to resign, and for me to take over the whole
charge, he had the melancholy satisfaction of knowing that not only was the
standing of the opera seriously weakened by the departure of the prima
donna, but that there was good reason to doubt whether the theatre could be
carried on at all. This month of Lent, which was such a bad time in
all kinds of fictitious titles of nobility, has been read to the assembled
company (composed, say, of the elite of the noble immigrants at the time of
the French Revolution), there is heard suddenly the pipe of the bear-leader,
who enters the garden with his prancing beast. Angered by this trivial
diversion, the astonished company become indignant when the bridegroom,
giving free vent to his feelings, throws himself with tears of joy into the
arms of the bear-leader and loudly proclaims him as his long-lost father.
The consternation of the company becomes even greater, however, when
the bear itself embraces the man they supposed to be of noble birth, for the
beast is no less a person than his own brother in the flesh who, on the death
of the real bear, had donned its skin, thus enabling the poverty-stricken pair
to continue to earn their livelihood in the only way left to them. This public
disclosure of the bridegroom’s lowly origin at once dissolves the marriage,
and the young woman, declaring herself outwitted by man, offers her hand
in compensation to the released jeweller.
To this unassuming subject I gave the title of the Gluckliche
Barenfamilie, and provided it with a dialogue which afterwards met with
Holtei’s highest approval.
I was about to begin the music for it in a new light French style, but the
seriousness of my position, which grew more and more acute, prevented
further progress in my work.
In this respect my strained relations with the conductor of the theatre
were still a constant source of trouble. With neither the opportunity nor the
means to defend myself, I had to submit to being maligned and rendered an
object of suspicion on all sides by my rival, who remained master of the
field. The object of this was to disgust me with the idea of taking up my
appointment as musical conductor, for which the contract had been signed
for Easter. Though I did not lose my self-confidence, I suffered keenly from
the indignity and the depressing effect of this prolonged strain.
When at last, at the beginning of April, the moment arrived for the
musical conductor Schubert to resign, and for me to take over the whole
charge, he had the melancholy satisfaction of knowing that not only was the
standing of the opera seriously weakened by the departure of the prima
donna, but that there was good reason to doubt whether the theatre could be
carried on at all. This month of Lent, which was such a bad time in
Page 160
Germany for all similar theatrical enterprises, decimated the Königsberg
audience with the rest. The director took the greatest trouble imaginable to
fill up the gaps in the staff of the opera by means of engaging strangers
temporarily, and by new acquisitions, and in this my personality and
unflagging activity were of real service; I devoted all my energy to buoying
up by word and deed the tattered ship of the theatre, in which I now had a
hand for the first time.
For a long time I had to try and keep cool under the most violent
treatment by a clique of students, among whom my predecessor had raised
up enemies for me; and by the unerring certainty of my conducting I had to
overcome the initial opposition of the orchestra, which had been set against
me.
After laboriously laying the foundation of personal respect, I was now
forced to realise that the business methods of the director, Hubsch, had
already involved too great a sacrifice to permit the theatre to make its way
against the unfavourableness of the season, and in May he admitted to me
that he had come to the point of being obliged to close the theatre.
By summoning up all my eloquence, and by making suggestions which
promised a happy issue, I was able to induce him to persevere; nevertheless,
this was only possible by making demands on the loyalty of his company,
who were asked to forego part of their salaries for a time. This aroused
general bitterness on the part of the uninitiated, and I found myself in the
curious position of being forced to place the director in a favourable light to
those who were hard hit by these measures, while I myself and my position
were affected in such a manner that my situation became daily more
unendurable under the accumulation of intolerable difficulties taking their
root in my past.
But though I did not even then lose courage, Minna, who as my wife was
robbed of all that she had a right to expect, found this turn of fate quite
unbearable. The hidden canker of our married life which, even before our
marriage, had caused me the most terrible anxiety and led to violent scenes,
reached its full growth under these sad conditions. The less I was able to
maintain the standard of comfort due to our position by working and
making the most of my talents, the more did Minna, to my insufferable
shame, consider it necessary to take this burden upon herself by making the
most of her personal popularity. The discovery of similar condescensions—
audience with the rest. The director took the greatest trouble imaginable to
fill up the gaps in the staff of the opera by means of engaging strangers
temporarily, and by new acquisitions, and in this my personality and
unflagging activity were of real service; I devoted all my energy to buoying
up by word and deed the tattered ship of the theatre, in which I now had a
hand for the first time.
For a long time I had to try and keep cool under the most violent
treatment by a clique of students, among whom my predecessor had raised
up enemies for me; and by the unerring certainty of my conducting I had to
overcome the initial opposition of the orchestra, which had been set against
me.
After laboriously laying the foundation of personal respect, I was now
forced to realise that the business methods of the director, Hubsch, had
already involved too great a sacrifice to permit the theatre to make its way
against the unfavourableness of the season, and in May he admitted to me
that he had come to the point of being obliged to close the theatre.
By summoning up all my eloquence, and by making suggestions which
promised a happy issue, I was able to induce him to persevere; nevertheless,
this was only possible by making demands on the loyalty of his company,
who were asked to forego part of their salaries for a time. This aroused
general bitterness on the part of the uninitiated, and I found myself in the
curious position of being forced to place the director in a favourable light to
those who were hard hit by these measures, while I myself and my position
were affected in such a manner that my situation became daily more
unendurable under the accumulation of intolerable difficulties taking their
root in my past.
But though I did not even then lose courage, Minna, who as my wife was
robbed of all that she had a right to expect, found this turn of fate quite
unbearable. The hidden canker of our married life which, even before our
marriage, had caused me the most terrible anxiety and led to violent scenes,
reached its full growth under these sad conditions. The less I was able to
maintain the standard of comfort due to our position by working and
making the most of my talents, the more did Minna, to my insufferable
shame, consider it necessary to take this burden upon herself by making the
most of her personal popularity. The discovery of similar condescensions—
Page 161
as I used to call them—on Minna’s part, had repeatedly led to revolting
scenes, and only her peculiar conception of her professional position and
the needs it involved had made a charitable interpretation possible.
I was absolutely unable to bring my young wife to see my point of view,
or to make her realise my own wounded feelings on these occasions, while
the unrestrained violence of my speech and behaviour made an
understanding once and for all impossible. These scenes frequently sent my
wife into convulsions of so alarming a nature that, as will easily be realised,
the satisfaction of reconciling her once more was all that remained to me.
Certain it was that our mutual attitude became more and more
incomprehensible and inexplicable to us both.
These quarrels, which now became more frequent and more distressing,
may have gone far to diminish the strength of any affection which Minna
was able to give me, but I had no idea that she was only waiting for a
favourable opportunity to come to a desperate decision.
To fill the place of tenor in our company, I had summoned Friedrich
Schmitt to Königsberg, a friend of my first year in Magdeburg, to whom
allusion has already been made. He was sincerely devoted to me, and
helped me as much as possible in overcoming the dangers which threatened
the prosperity of the theatre as well as my own position.
The necessity of being on friendly terms with the public made me much
less reserved and cautious in making new acquaintances, especially when in
his company.
A rich merchant, of the name of Dietrich, had recently constituted
himself a patron of the theatre, and especially of the women. With due
deference to the men with whom they were connected, he used to invite the
pick of these ladies to dinner at his house, and affected, on these occasions,
the well-to-do Englishman, which was the beau-ideal for German
merchants, especially in the manufacturing towns of the north.
I had shown my annoyance at the acceptance of the invitation, sent to us
among the rest, at first simply because his looks were repugnant to me.
Minna considered this very unjust. Anyhow, I set my face decidedly against
continuing our acquaintance with this man, and although Minna did not
insist on receiving him, my conduct towards the intruder was the cause of
angry scenes between us.
scenes, and only her peculiar conception of her professional position and
the needs it involved had made a charitable interpretation possible.
I was absolutely unable to bring my young wife to see my point of view,
or to make her realise my own wounded feelings on these occasions, while
the unrestrained violence of my speech and behaviour made an
understanding once and for all impossible. These scenes frequently sent my
wife into convulsions of so alarming a nature that, as will easily be realised,
the satisfaction of reconciling her once more was all that remained to me.
Certain it was that our mutual attitude became more and more
incomprehensible and inexplicable to us both.
These quarrels, which now became more frequent and more distressing,
may have gone far to diminish the strength of any affection which Minna
was able to give me, but I had no idea that she was only waiting for a
favourable opportunity to come to a desperate decision.
To fill the place of tenor in our company, I had summoned Friedrich
Schmitt to Königsberg, a friend of my first year in Magdeburg, to whom
allusion has already been made. He was sincerely devoted to me, and
helped me as much as possible in overcoming the dangers which threatened
the prosperity of the theatre as well as my own position.
The necessity of being on friendly terms with the public made me much
less reserved and cautious in making new acquaintances, especially when in
his company.
A rich merchant, of the name of Dietrich, had recently constituted
himself a patron of the theatre, and especially of the women. With due
deference to the men with whom they were connected, he used to invite the
pick of these ladies to dinner at his house, and affected, on these occasions,
the well-to-do Englishman, which was the beau-ideal for German
merchants, especially in the manufacturing towns of the north.
I had shown my annoyance at the acceptance of the invitation, sent to us
among the rest, at first simply because his looks were repugnant to me.
Minna considered this very unjust. Anyhow, I set my face decidedly against
continuing our acquaintance with this man, and although Minna did not
insist on receiving him, my conduct towards the intruder was the cause of
angry scenes between us.
Page 162
One day Friedrich Schmitt considered it his duty to inform me that this
Herr Dietrich had spoken of me at a public dinner in such a manner as to
lead every one to suppose that he had a suspicious intimacy with my wife. I
felt obliged to suspect Minna of having, in some way unknown to me, told
the fellow about my conduct towards her, as well as about our precarious
position.
Accompanied by Schmitt, I called this dangerous person to account on
the subject in his own home. At first this only led to the usual denials.
Afterwards, however, he sent secret communications to Minna concerning
the interview, thus providing her with a supposed new grievance against me
in the form of my inconsiderate treatment of her.
Our relations now reached a critical stage, and on certain points we
preserved silence.
At the same time—it was towards the end of May, 1837—the business
affairs of the theatre had reached the crisis above mentioned, when the
management was obliged to fall back on the self-sacrificing co-operation of
the staff to assure the continuance of the undertaking. As I have said before,
my own position at the end of a year so disastrous to my welfare was
seriously affected by this; nevertheless, there seemed to be no alternative
for me but to face these difficulties patiently, and relying on the faithful
Friedrich Schmitt, but ignoring Minna, I began to take the necessary steps
for making my post at Königsberg secure. This, as well as the arduous part I
took in the business of the theatre, kept me so busy and so much away from
home, that I was not able to pay any particular attention to Minna’s silence
and reserve.
On the morning of the 31st of May I took leave of Minna, expecting to be
detained till late in the afternoon by rehearsals and business matters. With
my entire approval she had for some time been accustomed to have her
daughter Nathalie, who was supposed by every one to be her youngest
sister, to stay with her.
As I was about to wish them my usual quiet good-bye, the two women
rushed after me to the door and embraced me passionately, Minna as well as
her daughter bursting into tears. I was alarmed, and asked the meaning of
this excitement, but could get no answer from them, and I was obliged to
leave them and ponder alone over their peculiar conduct, of the reason for
which I had not even the faintest idea.
Herr Dietrich had spoken of me at a public dinner in such a manner as to
lead every one to suppose that he had a suspicious intimacy with my wife. I
felt obliged to suspect Minna of having, in some way unknown to me, told
the fellow about my conduct towards her, as well as about our precarious
position.
Accompanied by Schmitt, I called this dangerous person to account on
the subject in his own home. At first this only led to the usual denials.
Afterwards, however, he sent secret communications to Minna concerning
the interview, thus providing her with a supposed new grievance against me
in the form of my inconsiderate treatment of her.
Our relations now reached a critical stage, and on certain points we
preserved silence.
At the same time—it was towards the end of May, 1837—the business
affairs of the theatre had reached the crisis above mentioned, when the
management was obliged to fall back on the self-sacrificing co-operation of
the staff to assure the continuance of the undertaking. As I have said before,
my own position at the end of a year so disastrous to my welfare was
seriously affected by this; nevertheless, there seemed to be no alternative
for me but to face these difficulties patiently, and relying on the faithful
Friedrich Schmitt, but ignoring Minna, I began to take the necessary steps
for making my post at Königsberg secure. This, as well as the arduous part I
took in the business of the theatre, kept me so busy and so much away from
home, that I was not able to pay any particular attention to Minna’s silence
and reserve.
On the morning of the 31st of May I took leave of Minna, expecting to be
detained till late in the afternoon by rehearsals and business matters. With
my entire approval she had for some time been accustomed to have her
daughter Nathalie, who was supposed by every one to be her youngest
sister, to stay with her.
As I was about to wish them my usual quiet good-bye, the two women
rushed after me to the door and embraced me passionately, Minna as well as
her daughter bursting into tears. I was alarmed, and asked the meaning of
this excitement, but could get no answer from them, and I was obliged to
leave them and ponder alone over their peculiar conduct, of the reason for
which I had not even the faintest idea.
Page 163
I arrived home late in the afternoon, worn out by my exertions and
worries, dead-tired, pale and hungry, and was surprised to find the table not
laid and Minna not at home, the maid telling me that she had not yet
returned from her walk with Nathalie.
I waited patiently, sinking down exhausted at the work-table, which I
absent-mindedly opened. To my intense astonishment it was empty. Horror-
struck, I sprang up and went to the wardrobe, and realised at once that
Minna had left the house; her departure had been so cunningly planned that
even the maid was unaware of it.
With death in my soul I dashed out of the house to investigate the cause
of Minna’s disappearance.
Old Möller, by his practical sagacity, very soon found out that Dietrich,
his personal enemy, had left Königsberg in the direction of Berlin by the
special coach in the morning.
This horrible fact stood staring me in the face.
I had now to try and overtake the fugitives. With the lavish use of money
this might have been possible, but funds were lacking, and had, in part, to
be laboriously collected.
On Möller’s advice I took the silver wedding presents with me in case of
emergency, and after the lapse of a few terrible hours went off, also by
special coach, with my distressed old friend. We hoped to overtake the
ordinary mail-coach, which had started a short time before, as it was
probable that Minna would also continue her journey in this, at a safe
distance from Königsberg.
This proved impossible, and when next morning at break of day we
arrived in Elbing, we found our money exhausted by the lavish use of the
express coach, and were compelled to return; we discovered, moreover, that
even by using the ordinary coach we should be obliged to pawn the sugar-
basin and cake-dish.
This return journey to Königsberg rightly remains one of the saddest
memories of my youth. Of course, I did not for a moment entertain the idea
of remaining in the place; my one thought was how I could best get away.
Hemmed in between the law-suits of my Magdeburg creditors and the
Königsberg tradesmen, who had claims on me for the payment by
instalment of my domestic accounts, my departure could only be carried out
worries, dead-tired, pale and hungry, and was surprised to find the table not
laid and Minna not at home, the maid telling me that she had not yet
returned from her walk with Nathalie.
I waited patiently, sinking down exhausted at the work-table, which I
absent-mindedly opened. To my intense astonishment it was empty. Horror-
struck, I sprang up and went to the wardrobe, and realised at once that
Minna had left the house; her departure had been so cunningly planned that
even the maid was unaware of it.
With death in my soul I dashed out of the house to investigate the cause
of Minna’s disappearance.
Old Möller, by his practical sagacity, very soon found out that Dietrich,
his personal enemy, had left Königsberg in the direction of Berlin by the
special coach in the morning.
This horrible fact stood staring me in the face.
I had now to try and overtake the fugitives. With the lavish use of money
this might have been possible, but funds were lacking, and had, in part, to
be laboriously collected.
On Möller’s advice I took the silver wedding presents with me in case of
emergency, and after the lapse of a few terrible hours went off, also by
special coach, with my distressed old friend. We hoped to overtake the
ordinary mail-coach, which had started a short time before, as it was
probable that Minna would also continue her journey in this, at a safe
distance from Königsberg.
This proved impossible, and when next morning at break of day we
arrived in Elbing, we found our money exhausted by the lavish use of the
express coach, and were compelled to return; we discovered, moreover, that
even by using the ordinary coach we should be obliged to pawn the sugar-
basin and cake-dish.
This return journey to Königsberg rightly remains one of the saddest
memories of my youth. Of course, I did not for a moment entertain the idea
of remaining in the place; my one thought was how I could best get away.
Hemmed in between the law-suits of my Magdeburg creditors and the
Königsberg tradesmen, who had claims on me for the payment by
instalment of my domestic accounts, my departure could only be carried out
Page 164
in secrecy. For this very reason, too, it was necessary for me to raise money,
particularly for the long journey from Königsberg to Dresden, whither I
determined to go in quest of my wife, and these matters detained me for two
long and terrible days.
I received no news whatever from Minna; from Möller I ascertained that
she had gone to Dresden, and that Dietrich had only accompanied her for a
short distance on the excuse of helping her in a friendly way.
I succeeded in assuring myself that she really only wished to get away
from a position that filled her with desperation, and for this purpose had
accepted the assistance of a man who sympathised with her, and that she
was for the present seeking rest and shelter with her parents. My first
indignation at the event accordingly subsided to such an extent that I
gradually acquired more sympathy for her in her despair, and began to
reproach myself both for my conduct and for having brought unhappiness
on her.
I became so convinced of the correctness of this view during the tedious
journey to Dresden via Berlin, which I eventually undertook on the 3rd of
June, that when at last I found Minna at the humble abode of her parents, I
was really quite unable to express anything but repentence and heartbroken
sympathy.
It was quite true that Minna thought herself badly treated by me, and
declared that she had only been forced to take this desperate step by
brooding over our impossible position, to which she thought me both blind
and deaf. Her parents were not pleased to see me: the painfully excited
condition of their daughter seemed to afford sufficient justification for her
complaints against me. Whether my own sufferings, my hasty pursuit, and
the heartfelt expression of my grief made any favourable impression on her,
I can really hardly say, as her manner towards me was very confused and, to
a certain extent, incomprehensible. Still she was impressed when I told her
that there was a good prospect of my obtaining the post of musical
conductor at Riga, where a new theatre was about to be opened under the
most favourable conditions. I felt that I must not press for new resolutions
concerning the regulation of our future relations just then, but must strive
the more earnestly to lay a better foundation for them. Consequently, after
spending a fearful week with my wife under the most painful conditions, I
went to Berlin, there to sign my agreement with the new director of the
particularly for the long journey from Königsberg to Dresden, whither I
determined to go in quest of my wife, and these matters detained me for two
long and terrible days.
I received no news whatever from Minna; from Möller I ascertained that
she had gone to Dresden, and that Dietrich had only accompanied her for a
short distance on the excuse of helping her in a friendly way.
I succeeded in assuring myself that she really only wished to get away
from a position that filled her with desperation, and for this purpose had
accepted the assistance of a man who sympathised with her, and that she
was for the present seeking rest and shelter with her parents. My first
indignation at the event accordingly subsided to such an extent that I
gradually acquired more sympathy for her in her despair, and began to
reproach myself both for my conduct and for having brought unhappiness
on her.
I became so convinced of the correctness of this view during the tedious
journey to Dresden via Berlin, which I eventually undertook on the 3rd of
June, that when at last I found Minna at the humble abode of her parents, I
was really quite unable to express anything but repentence and heartbroken
sympathy.
It was quite true that Minna thought herself badly treated by me, and
declared that she had only been forced to take this desperate step by
brooding over our impossible position, to which she thought me both blind
and deaf. Her parents were not pleased to see me: the painfully excited
condition of their daughter seemed to afford sufficient justification for her
complaints against me. Whether my own sufferings, my hasty pursuit, and
the heartfelt expression of my grief made any favourable impression on her,
I can really hardly say, as her manner towards me was very confused and, to
a certain extent, incomprehensible. Still she was impressed when I told her
that there was a good prospect of my obtaining the post of musical
conductor at Riga, where a new theatre was about to be opened under the
most favourable conditions. I felt that I must not press for new resolutions
concerning the regulation of our future relations just then, but must strive
the more earnestly to lay a better foundation for them. Consequently, after
spending a fearful week with my wife under the most painful conditions, I
went to Berlin, there to sign my agreement with the new director of the
Page 165
Riga theatre. I obtained the appointment on fairly favourable terms which, I
saw, would enable me to keep house in such a style that Minna could retire
from the theatre altogether. By this means she would be in a position to
spare me all humiliation and anxiety.
On returning to Dresden, I found that Minna was ready to lend a willing
ear to my proposed plans, and I succeeded in inducing her to leave her
parents’ house, which was very cramped for us, and to establish herself in
the country at Blasewitz, near Dresden, to await our removal to Riga. We
found modest lodgings at an inn on the Elbe, in the farm-yard of which I
had often played as a child. Here Minna’s frame of mind really seemed to
be improving. She had begged me not to press her too hard, and I spared her
as much as possible. After a few weeks I thought I might consider the
period of uneasiness past, but was surprised to find the situation growing
worse again without any apparent reason. Minna then told me of some
advantageous offers she had received from different theatres, and
astonished me one day by announcing her intention of taking a short
pleasure trip with a girl friend and her family. As I felt obliged to avoid
putting any restraint upon her, I offered no objection to the execution of this
project, which entailed a week’s separation, but accompanied her back to
her parents myself, promising to await her return quietly at Blasewitz. A
few days later her eldest sister called to ask me for the written permission
required to make out a passport for my wife. This alarmed me, and I went to
Dresden to ask her parents what their daughter was about. There, to my
surprise, I met with a very unpleasant reception; they reproached me
coarsely for my behaviour to Minna, whom they said I could not even
manage to support, and when I only replied by asking for information as to
the whereabouts of my wife, and about her plans for the future, I was put
off with improbable statements. Tormented by the sharpest forebodings, and
understanding nothing of what had occurred, I went back to the village,
where I found a letter from Königsberg, from Möller, which poured light on
all my misery. Herr Dietrich had gone to Dresden, and I was told the name
of the hotel at which he was staying. The terrible illumination thrown by
this communication upon Minna’s conduct showed me in a flash what to do.
I hurried into town to make the necessary inquiries at the hotel mentioned,
and found that the man in question had been there, but had moved on again.
He had vanished, and Minna too! I now knew enough to demand of the
saw, would enable me to keep house in such a style that Minna could retire
from the theatre altogether. By this means she would be in a position to
spare me all humiliation and anxiety.
On returning to Dresden, I found that Minna was ready to lend a willing
ear to my proposed plans, and I succeeded in inducing her to leave her
parents’ house, which was very cramped for us, and to establish herself in
the country at Blasewitz, near Dresden, to await our removal to Riga. We
found modest lodgings at an inn on the Elbe, in the farm-yard of which I
had often played as a child. Here Minna’s frame of mind really seemed to
be improving. She had begged me not to press her too hard, and I spared her
as much as possible. After a few weeks I thought I might consider the
period of uneasiness past, but was surprised to find the situation growing
worse again without any apparent reason. Minna then told me of some
advantageous offers she had received from different theatres, and
astonished me one day by announcing her intention of taking a short
pleasure trip with a girl friend and her family. As I felt obliged to avoid
putting any restraint upon her, I offered no objection to the execution of this
project, which entailed a week’s separation, but accompanied her back to
her parents myself, promising to await her return quietly at Blasewitz. A
few days later her eldest sister called to ask me for the written permission
required to make out a passport for my wife. This alarmed me, and I went to
Dresden to ask her parents what their daughter was about. There, to my
surprise, I met with a very unpleasant reception; they reproached me
coarsely for my behaviour to Minna, whom they said I could not even
manage to support, and when I only replied by asking for information as to
the whereabouts of my wife, and about her plans for the future, I was put
off with improbable statements. Tormented by the sharpest forebodings, and
understanding nothing of what had occurred, I went back to the village,
where I found a letter from Königsberg, from Möller, which poured light on
all my misery. Herr Dietrich had gone to Dresden, and I was told the name
of the hotel at which he was staying. The terrible illumination thrown by
this communication upon Minna’s conduct showed me in a flash what to do.
I hurried into town to make the necessary inquiries at the hotel mentioned,
and found that the man in question had been there, but had moved on again.
He had vanished, and Minna too! I now knew enough to demand of the
Page 166
Fates why, at such an early age, they had sent me this terrible experience
which, as it seemed to me, had poisoned my whole existence.
I sought consolation for my boundless grief in the society of my sister
Ottilie and her husband, Hermann Brockhaus, an excellent fellow to whom
she had been married for some years. They were then living at their pretty
summer villa in the lovely Grosser Garten, near Dresden. I had looked them
up at once the first time I went to Dresden, but as I had not at that time the
slightest idea of how things were going to turn out, I had told them nothing,
and had seen but little of them. Now I was moved to break my obstinate
silence, and unfold to them the cause of my misery, with but few
reservations.
For the first time I was in a position gratefully to appreciate the
advantages of family intercourse, and of the direct and disinterested
intimacy between blood relations. Explanations were hardly necessary, and
as brother and sister we found ourselves as closely linked now as we had
been when we were children. We arrived at a complete understanding
without having to explain what we meant; I was unhappy, she was happy;
consolation and help followed as a matter of course.
This was the sister to whom I once had read Leubald und Adelaïde in a
thunderstorm; the sister who had listened, filled with astonishment and
sympathy, to that eventful performance of my first overture on Christmas
Eve, and whom I now found married to one of the kindest of men, Hermann
Brockhaus, who soon earned a reputation for himself as an expert in
oriental languages. He was the youngest brother of my elder brother-in-law,
Friedrich Brockhaus. Their union was blessed by two children; their
comfortable means favoured a life free from care, and when I made my
daily pilgrimage from Blasewitz to the famous Grosser Garten, it was like
stepping from a desert into paradise to enter their house (one of the popular
villas), knowing that I would invariably find a welcome in this happy
family circle. Not only was my spirit soothed and benefited by intercourse
with my sister, but my creative instincts, which had long lain dormant, were
stimulated afresh by the society of my brilliant and learned brother-in-law.
It was brought home to me, without in any way hurting my feelings, that
my early marriage, excusable as it may have been, was yet an error to be
retrieved, and my mind regained sufficient elasticity to compose some
sketches, designed this time not merely to meet the requirements of the
which, as it seemed to me, had poisoned my whole existence.
I sought consolation for my boundless grief in the society of my sister
Ottilie and her husband, Hermann Brockhaus, an excellent fellow to whom
she had been married for some years. They were then living at their pretty
summer villa in the lovely Grosser Garten, near Dresden. I had looked them
up at once the first time I went to Dresden, but as I had not at that time the
slightest idea of how things were going to turn out, I had told them nothing,
and had seen but little of them. Now I was moved to break my obstinate
silence, and unfold to them the cause of my misery, with but few
reservations.
For the first time I was in a position gratefully to appreciate the
advantages of family intercourse, and of the direct and disinterested
intimacy between blood relations. Explanations were hardly necessary, and
as brother and sister we found ourselves as closely linked now as we had
been when we were children. We arrived at a complete understanding
without having to explain what we meant; I was unhappy, she was happy;
consolation and help followed as a matter of course.
This was the sister to whom I once had read Leubald und Adelaïde in a
thunderstorm; the sister who had listened, filled with astonishment and
sympathy, to that eventful performance of my first overture on Christmas
Eve, and whom I now found married to one of the kindest of men, Hermann
Brockhaus, who soon earned a reputation for himself as an expert in
oriental languages. He was the youngest brother of my elder brother-in-law,
Friedrich Brockhaus. Their union was blessed by two children; their
comfortable means favoured a life free from care, and when I made my
daily pilgrimage from Blasewitz to the famous Grosser Garten, it was like
stepping from a desert into paradise to enter their house (one of the popular
villas), knowing that I would invariably find a welcome in this happy
family circle. Not only was my spirit soothed and benefited by intercourse
with my sister, but my creative instincts, which had long lain dormant, were
stimulated afresh by the society of my brilliant and learned brother-in-law.
It was brought home to me, without in any way hurting my feelings, that
my early marriage, excusable as it may have been, was yet an error to be
retrieved, and my mind regained sufficient elasticity to compose some
sketches, designed this time not merely to meet the requirements of the
Page 167
theatre as I knew it. During the last wretched days I had spent with Minna
at Blasewitz, I had read Bulwer Lytton’s novel, Rienzi; during my
convalescence in the bosom of my sympathetic family, I now worked out
the scheme for a grand opera under the inspiration of this book. Though
obliged for the present to return to the limitations of a small theatre, I tried
from this time onwards to aim at enlarging my sphere of action. I sent my
overture, Rule Britannia, to the Philharmonic Society in London, and tried
to get into communication with Scribe in Paris about a setting for H.
Konig’s novel, Die Hohe Braut, which I had sketched out.
Thus I spent the remainder of this summer of ever-happy memory. At the
end of August I had to leave for Riga to take up my new appointment.
Although I knew that my sister Rosalie had shortly before married the man
of her choice, Professor Oswald Marbach of Leipzig, I avoided that city,
probably with the foolish notion of sparing myself any humiliation, and
went straight to Berlin, where I had to receive certain additional instructions
from my future director, and also to obtain my passport. There I met a
younger sister of Minna’s, Amalie Planer, a singer with a pretty voice, who
had joined our opera company at Magdeburg for a short time. My report of
Minna quite overwhelmed this exceedingly kind-hearted girl. We went to a
performance of Fidelia together, during which she, like myself, burst into
tears and sobs. Refreshed by the sympathetic impression I had received, I
went by way of Schwerin, where I was disappointed in my hopes of finding
traces of Minna, to Lubeck, to wait for a merchant ship going to Riga. We
had set sail for Travemunde when an unfavourable wind set in, and held up
our departure for a week: I had to spend this disagreeable time in a
miserable ship’s tavern. Thrown on my own resources I tried, amongst other
things, to read Till Eulenspiegel, and this popular book first gave me the
idea of a real German comic opera. Long afterwards, when I was
composing the words for my Junger Siegfried, I remember having many
vivid recollections of this melancholy sojourn in Travemunde and my
reading of Till Eulenspiegel. After a voyage of four days we at last reached
port at Bolderaa. I was conscious of a peculiar thrill on coming into contact
with Russian officials, whom I had instinctively detested since the days of
my sympathy with the Poles as a boy. It seemed to me as if the harbour
police must read enthusiasm for the Poles in my face, and would send me to
Siberia on the spot, and I was the more agreeably surprised, on reaching
at Blasewitz, I had read Bulwer Lytton’s novel, Rienzi; during my
convalescence in the bosom of my sympathetic family, I now worked out
the scheme for a grand opera under the inspiration of this book. Though
obliged for the present to return to the limitations of a small theatre, I tried
from this time onwards to aim at enlarging my sphere of action. I sent my
overture, Rule Britannia, to the Philharmonic Society in London, and tried
to get into communication with Scribe in Paris about a setting for H.
Konig’s novel, Die Hohe Braut, which I had sketched out.
Thus I spent the remainder of this summer of ever-happy memory. At the
end of August I had to leave for Riga to take up my new appointment.
Although I knew that my sister Rosalie had shortly before married the man
of her choice, Professor Oswald Marbach of Leipzig, I avoided that city,
probably with the foolish notion of sparing myself any humiliation, and
went straight to Berlin, where I had to receive certain additional instructions
from my future director, and also to obtain my passport. There I met a
younger sister of Minna’s, Amalie Planer, a singer with a pretty voice, who
had joined our opera company at Magdeburg for a short time. My report of
Minna quite overwhelmed this exceedingly kind-hearted girl. We went to a
performance of Fidelia together, during which she, like myself, burst into
tears and sobs. Refreshed by the sympathetic impression I had received, I
went by way of Schwerin, where I was disappointed in my hopes of finding
traces of Minna, to Lubeck, to wait for a merchant ship going to Riga. We
had set sail for Travemunde when an unfavourable wind set in, and held up
our departure for a week: I had to spend this disagreeable time in a
miserable ship’s tavern. Thrown on my own resources I tried, amongst other
things, to read Till Eulenspiegel, and this popular book first gave me the
idea of a real German comic opera. Long afterwards, when I was
composing the words for my Junger Siegfried, I remember having many
vivid recollections of this melancholy sojourn in Travemunde and my
reading of Till Eulenspiegel. After a voyage of four days we at last reached
port at Bolderaa. I was conscious of a peculiar thrill on coming into contact
with Russian officials, whom I had instinctively detested since the days of
my sympathy with the Poles as a boy. It seemed to me as if the harbour
police must read enthusiasm for the Poles in my face, and would send me to
Siberia on the spot, and I was the more agreeably surprised, on reaching
Page 168
Riga, to find myself surrounded by the familiar German element which,
above all, pervaded everything connected with the theatre.
After my unfortunate experiences in connection with the conditions of
small German stages, the way in which this newly opened theatre was run
had at first a calming effect on my mind. A society had been formed by a
number of well-to-do theatre-goers and rich business men to raise, by
voluntary subscription, sufficient money to provide the sort of management
they regarded as ideal with a solid foundation. The director they appointed
was Karl von Holtei, a fairly popular dramatic writer, who enjoyed a certain
reputation in the theatrical world. This man’s ideas about the stage
represented a special tendency, which was at that time on the decline. He
possessed, in addition to his remarkable social gifts, an extraordinary
acquaintance with all the principal people connected with the theatre during
the past twenty years, and belonged to a society called Die
Liebenswurdigen Libertins (‘The Amiable Libertines’). This was a set of
young would-be wits, who looked upon the stage as a playground licensed
by the public for the display of their mad pranks, from which the middle
class held aloof, while people of culture were steadily losing all interest in
the theatre under these hopeless conditions.
Holtei’s wife had in former days been a popular actress at the Konigstadt
theatre in Berlin, and it was here, at the time when Henriette Sontag raised
it to the height of its fame, that Holtei’s style had been formed. The
production there of his melodrama Leonore (founded on Burger’s ballad)
had in particular earned him a wide reputation as a writer for the stage,
besides which he produced some Liederspiele, and among them one,
entitled Der Alte Feldherr, became fairly popular. His invitation to Riga had
been particularly welcome, as it bid fair to gratify his craving to absorb
himself completely in the life of the stage; he hoped, in this out-of-the-way
place, to indulge his passion without restraint. His peculiar familiarity of
manner, his inexhaustible store of amusing small talk, and his airy way of
doing business, gave him a remarkable hold on the tradespeople of Riga,
who wished for nothing better than such entertainment as he was able to
give them. They provided him liberally with all the necessary means and
treated him in every respect with entire confidence. Under his auspices my
own engagement had been very easily secured. Surly old pedants he would
have none of, favouring young men on the score of their youth alone. As far
as I myself was concerned, it was enough for him to know that I belonged
above all, pervaded everything connected with the theatre.
After my unfortunate experiences in connection with the conditions of
small German stages, the way in which this newly opened theatre was run
had at first a calming effect on my mind. A society had been formed by a
number of well-to-do theatre-goers and rich business men to raise, by
voluntary subscription, sufficient money to provide the sort of management
they regarded as ideal with a solid foundation. The director they appointed
was Karl von Holtei, a fairly popular dramatic writer, who enjoyed a certain
reputation in the theatrical world. This man’s ideas about the stage
represented a special tendency, which was at that time on the decline. He
possessed, in addition to his remarkable social gifts, an extraordinary
acquaintance with all the principal people connected with the theatre during
the past twenty years, and belonged to a society called Die
Liebenswurdigen Libertins (‘The Amiable Libertines’). This was a set of
young would-be wits, who looked upon the stage as a playground licensed
by the public for the display of their mad pranks, from which the middle
class held aloof, while people of culture were steadily losing all interest in
the theatre under these hopeless conditions.
Holtei’s wife had in former days been a popular actress at the Konigstadt
theatre in Berlin, and it was here, at the time when Henriette Sontag raised
it to the height of its fame, that Holtei’s style had been formed. The
production there of his melodrama Leonore (founded on Burger’s ballad)
had in particular earned him a wide reputation as a writer for the stage,
besides which he produced some Liederspiele, and among them one,
entitled Der Alte Feldherr, became fairly popular. His invitation to Riga had
been particularly welcome, as it bid fair to gratify his craving to absorb
himself completely in the life of the stage; he hoped, in this out-of-the-way
place, to indulge his passion without restraint. His peculiar familiarity of
manner, his inexhaustible store of amusing small talk, and his airy way of
doing business, gave him a remarkable hold on the tradespeople of Riga,
who wished for nothing better than such entertainment as he was able to
give them. They provided him liberally with all the necessary means and
treated him in every respect with entire confidence. Under his auspices my
own engagement had been very easily secured. Surly old pedants he would
have none of, favouring young men on the score of their youth alone. As far
as I myself was concerned, it was enough for him to know that I belonged
Page 169
to a family which he knew and liked, and hearing, moreover, of my fervent
devotion to modern Italian and French music in particular, he decided that I
was the very man for him. He had the whole shoal of Bellini’s, Donizetti’s,
Adam’s, and Auber’s operatic scores copied out, and I was to give the good
people of Riga the benefit of them with all possible speed.
The first time I visited Holtei I met an old Leipzig acquaintance, Heinrich
Dorn, my former mentor, who now held the permanent municipal
appointment of choir-master at the church and music-teacher in the schools.
He was pleased to find his curious pupil transformed into a practical opera
conductor of independent position, and no less surprised to see the eccentric
worshipper of Beethoven changed into an ardent champion of Bellini and
Adam. He took me home to his summer residence, which was built,
according to Riga phraseology, ‘in the fields,’ that is literally, on the sand.
While I was giving him some account of the experiences through which I
had passed, I grew conscious of the strangely deserted look of the place.
Feeling frightened and homeless, my initial uneasiness gradually developed
into a passionate longing to escape from all the whirl of theatrical life which
had wooed me to such inhospitable regions. This uneasy mood was fast
dispelling the flippancy which at Magdeburg had led to my being dragged
down to the level of the most worthless stage society, and had also
conduced to spoil my musical taste. It also contained the germs of a new
tendency which developed during the period of my activity at Riga, brought
me more and more out of touch with the theatre, thereby causing Director
Holtei all the annoyance which inevitably attends disappointment.
For some time, however, I found no difficulty in making the best of a bad
bargain. We were obliged to open the theatre before the company was
complete. To make this possible, we gave a performance of a short comic
opera by C. Blum, called Marie, Max und Michel. For this work I
composed an additional air for a song which Holtei had written for the bass
singer, Gunther; it consisted of a sentimental introduction and a gay military
rondo, and was very much appreciated. Later on, I introduced another
additional song into the Schweizerfamilie, to be sung by another bass
singer, Scheibler; it was of a devotional character, and pleased not only the
public, but myself, and showed signs of the upheaval which was gradually
taking place in my musical development. I was entrusted with the
composition of a tune for a National Hymn written by Brakel in honour of
the Tsar Nicholas’s birthday. I tried to give it as far as possible the right
devotion to modern Italian and French music in particular, he decided that I
was the very man for him. He had the whole shoal of Bellini’s, Donizetti’s,
Adam’s, and Auber’s operatic scores copied out, and I was to give the good
people of Riga the benefit of them with all possible speed.
The first time I visited Holtei I met an old Leipzig acquaintance, Heinrich
Dorn, my former mentor, who now held the permanent municipal
appointment of choir-master at the church and music-teacher in the schools.
He was pleased to find his curious pupil transformed into a practical opera
conductor of independent position, and no less surprised to see the eccentric
worshipper of Beethoven changed into an ardent champion of Bellini and
Adam. He took me home to his summer residence, which was built,
according to Riga phraseology, ‘in the fields,’ that is literally, on the sand.
While I was giving him some account of the experiences through which I
had passed, I grew conscious of the strangely deserted look of the place.
Feeling frightened and homeless, my initial uneasiness gradually developed
into a passionate longing to escape from all the whirl of theatrical life which
had wooed me to such inhospitable regions. This uneasy mood was fast
dispelling the flippancy which at Magdeburg had led to my being dragged
down to the level of the most worthless stage society, and had also
conduced to spoil my musical taste. It also contained the germs of a new
tendency which developed during the period of my activity at Riga, brought
me more and more out of touch with the theatre, thereby causing Director
Holtei all the annoyance which inevitably attends disappointment.
For some time, however, I found no difficulty in making the best of a bad
bargain. We were obliged to open the theatre before the company was
complete. To make this possible, we gave a performance of a short comic
opera by C. Blum, called Marie, Max und Michel. For this work I
composed an additional air for a song which Holtei had written for the bass
singer, Gunther; it consisted of a sentimental introduction and a gay military
rondo, and was very much appreciated. Later on, I introduced another
additional song into the Schweizerfamilie, to be sung by another bass
singer, Scheibler; it was of a devotional character, and pleased not only the
public, but myself, and showed signs of the upheaval which was gradually
taking place in my musical development. I was entrusted with the
composition of a tune for a National Hymn written by Brakel in honour of
the Tsar Nicholas’s birthday. I tried to give it as far as possible the right
Page 170
colouring for a despotic patriarchal monarch, and once again I achieved
some fame, for it was sung for several successive years on that particular
day. Holtei tried to persuade me to write a bright, gay comic opera, or rather
a musical play, to be performed by our company just as it stood. I looked up
the libretto of my Glucktiche Barenfamilie, and found Holtei very well
disposed towards it (as I have stated elsewhere); but when I unearthed the
little music which I had already composed for it, I was overcome with
disgust at this way of writing; whereupon I made a present of the book to
my clumsy, good-natured friend, Lobmann, my right-hand man in the
orchestra, and never gave it another thought from that day to this. I
managed, however, to get to work on the libretto of Rienzi, which I had
sketched out at Blasewitz. I developed it from every point of view, on so
extravagant a scale, that with this work I deliberately cut off all possibility
of being tempted by circumstances to produce it anywhere but on one of the
largest stages in Europe.
But while this helped to strengthen my endeavour to escape from all the
petty degradations of stage life, new complications arose which affected me
more and more seriously, and offered further opposition to my aims. The
prima donna engaged by Holtei had failed us, and we were therefore
without a singer for grand opera. Under the circumstances, Holtei joyfully
agreed to my proposal to ask Amalie, Minna’s sister (who was glad to
accept an engagement that brought her near me), to come to Riga at once.
In her answer to me from Dresden, where she was then living, she informed
me of Minna’s return to her parents, and of her present miserable condition
owing to a severe illness. I naturally took this piece of news very coolly, for
what I had heard about Minna since she left me for the last time had forced
me to authorise my old friend at Königsberg to take steps to procure a
divorce. It was certain that Minna had stayed for some time at a hotel in
Hamburg with that ill-omened man, Herr Dietrich, and that she had spread
abroad the story of our separation so unreservedly that the theatrical world
in particular had discussed it in a manner that was positively insulting to
me. I simply informed Amalie of this, and requested her to spare me any
further news of her sister.
Hereupon Minna herself appealed to me, and wrote me a positively
heartrending letter, in which she openly confessed her infidelity. She
declared that she had been driven to it by despair, but that the great trouble
she had thus brought upon herself having taught her a lesson, all she now
some fame, for it was sung for several successive years on that particular
day. Holtei tried to persuade me to write a bright, gay comic opera, or rather
a musical play, to be performed by our company just as it stood. I looked up
the libretto of my Glucktiche Barenfamilie, and found Holtei very well
disposed towards it (as I have stated elsewhere); but when I unearthed the
little music which I had already composed for it, I was overcome with
disgust at this way of writing; whereupon I made a present of the book to
my clumsy, good-natured friend, Lobmann, my right-hand man in the
orchestra, and never gave it another thought from that day to this. I
managed, however, to get to work on the libretto of Rienzi, which I had
sketched out at Blasewitz. I developed it from every point of view, on so
extravagant a scale, that with this work I deliberately cut off all possibility
of being tempted by circumstances to produce it anywhere but on one of the
largest stages in Europe.
But while this helped to strengthen my endeavour to escape from all the
petty degradations of stage life, new complications arose which affected me
more and more seriously, and offered further opposition to my aims. The
prima donna engaged by Holtei had failed us, and we were therefore
without a singer for grand opera. Under the circumstances, Holtei joyfully
agreed to my proposal to ask Amalie, Minna’s sister (who was glad to
accept an engagement that brought her near me), to come to Riga at once.
In her answer to me from Dresden, where she was then living, she informed
me of Minna’s return to her parents, and of her present miserable condition
owing to a severe illness. I naturally took this piece of news very coolly, for
what I had heard about Minna since she left me for the last time had forced
me to authorise my old friend at Königsberg to take steps to procure a
divorce. It was certain that Minna had stayed for some time at a hotel in
Hamburg with that ill-omened man, Herr Dietrich, and that she had spread
abroad the story of our separation so unreservedly that the theatrical world
in particular had discussed it in a manner that was positively insulting to
me. I simply informed Amalie of this, and requested her to spare me any
further news of her sister.
Hereupon Minna herself appealed to me, and wrote me a positively
heartrending letter, in which she openly confessed her infidelity. She
declared that she had been driven to it by despair, but that the great trouble
she had thus brought upon herself having taught her a lesson, all she now
Page 171
wished was to return to the right path. Taking everything into account, I
concluded that she had been deceived in the character of her seducer, and
the knowledge of her terrible position had placed her both morally and
physically in a most lamentable condition, in which, now ill and wretched,
she turned to me again to acknowledge her guilt, crave my forgiveness, and
assure me, in spite of all, that she had now become fully aware of her love
for me. Never before had I heard such sentiments from Minna, nor was I
ever to hear the same from her again, save on one touching occasion many
years later, when similar outpourings moved and affected me in the same
way as this particular letter had done. In reply I told her that there should
never again be any mention between us of what had occurred, for which I
took upon myself the chief blame; and I can pride myself on having carried
out this resolution to the letter.
When her sister’s engagement was satisfactorily settled, I at once invited
Minna to come to Riga with her. Both gladly accepted my invitation, and
arrived from Dresden at my new home on 19th October, wintry weather
having already set in. With much regret I perceived that Minna’s health had
really suffered, and therefore did all in my power to provide her with all the
domestic comforts and quiet she needed. This presented difficulties, for my
modest income as a conductor was all I had at my disposal, and we were
both firmly determined not to let Minna go on the stage again. On the other
hand, the carrying out of this resolve, in view of the financial inconvenience
it entailed, produced strange complications, the nature of which was only
revealed to me later, when startling developments divulged the real moral
character of the manager Holtei. For the present I had to let people think
that I was jealous of my wife. I bore patiently with the general belief that I
had good reasons to be so, and rejoiced meanwhile at the restoration of our
peaceful married life, and especially at the sight of our humble home, which
we made as comfortable as our means would allow, and in the keeping of
which Minna’s domestic talents came strongly to the fore. As we were still
childless, and were obliged as a rule to enlist the help of a dog in order to
give life to the domestic hearth, we once lighted upon the eccentric idea of
trying our luck with a young wolf which was brought into the house as a
tiny cub. When we found, however, that this experiment did not increase the
comfort of our home life, we gave him up after he had been with us a few
weeks. We fared better with sister Amalie; for she, with her good-nature and
simple homely ways, did much to make up for the absence of children for a
concluded that she had been deceived in the character of her seducer, and
the knowledge of her terrible position had placed her both morally and
physically in a most lamentable condition, in which, now ill and wretched,
she turned to me again to acknowledge her guilt, crave my forgiveness, and
assure me, in spite of all, that she had now become fully aware of her love
for me. Never before had I heard such sentiments from Minna, nor was I
ever to hear the same from her again, save on one touching occasion many
years later, when similar outpourings moved and affected me in the same
way as this particular letter had done. In reply I told her that there should
never again be any mention between us of what had occurred, for which I
took upon myself the chief blame; and I can pride myself on having carried
out this resolution to the letter.
When her sister’s engagement was satisfactorily settled, I at once invited
Minna to come to Riga with her. Both gladly accepted my invitation, and
arrived from Dresden at my new home on 19th October, wintry weather
having already set in. With much regret I perceived that Minna’s health had
really suffered, and therefore did all in my power to provide her with all the
domestic comforts and quiet she needed. This presented difficulties, for my
modest income as a conductor was all I had at my disposal, and we were
both firmly determined not to let Minna go on the stage again. On the other
hand, the carrying out of this resolve, in view of the financial inconvenience
it entailed, produced strange complications, the nature of which was only
revealed to me later, when startling developments divulged the real moral
character of the manager Holtei. For the present I had to let people think
that I was jealous of my wife. I bore patiently with the general belief that I
had good reasons to be so, and rejoiced meanwhile at the restoration of our
peaceful married life, and especially at the sight of our humble home, which
we made as comfortable as our means would allow, and in the keeping of
which Minna’s domestic talents came strongly to the fore. As we were still
childless, and were obliged as a rule to enlist the help of a dog in order to
give life to the domestic hearth, we once lighted upon the eccentric idea of
trying our luck with a young wolf which was brought into the house as a
tiny cub. When we found, however, that this experiment did not increase the
comfort of our home life, we gave him up after he had been with us a few
weeks. We fared better with sister Amalie; for she, with her good-nature and
simple homely ways, did much to make up for the absence of children for a
Page 172
time. The two sisters, neither of whom had had any real education, often
returned playfully to the ways of their childhood. When they sang children’s
duets, Minna, though she had had no musical training, always managed
very cleverly to sing seconds, and afterwards, as we sat at our evening
meal, eating Russian salad, salt salmon from the Dwina, or fresh Russian
caviare, we were all three very cheerful and happy far away in our northern
home.
Amalie’s beautiful voice and real vocal talent at first won for her a very
favourable reception with the public, a fact which did us all a great deal of
good. Being, however, very short, and having no very great gift for acting,
the scope of her powers was very limited, and as she was soon surpassed by
more successful competitors, it was a real stroke of good luck for her that a
young officer in the Russian army, then Captain, now General, Carl von
Meek, fell head over ears in love with the simple girl, and married her a
year later. The unfortunate part of this engagement, however, was that it
caused many difficulties, and brought the first cloud over our menage a
trois. For, after a while, the two sisters quarrelled bitterly, and I had the very
unpleasant experience of living for a whole year in the same house with two
relatives who neither saw nor spoke to each other.
We spent the winter at the beginning of 1838 in a very small dingy
dwelling in the old town; it was not till the spring that we moved into a
pleasanter house in the more salubrious Petersburg suburb, where, in spite
of the sisterly breach before referred to, we led a fairly bright and cheerful
life, as we were often able to entertain many of our friends and
acquaintances in a simple though pleasant fashion. In addition to members
of the stage I knew a few people in the town, and we received and visited
the family of Dorn, the musical director, with whom I became quite
intimate. But it was the second musical director, Franz Lobmann, a very
worthy though not a very gifted man, who became most faithfully attached
to me. However, I did not cultivate many acquaintances in wider circles,
and they grew fewer as the ruling passion of my life grew steadily stronger;
so that when, later on, I left Riga, after spending nearly two years there, I
departed almost as a stranger, and with as much indifference as I had left
Magdeburg and Königsberg. What, however, specially embittered my
departure was a series of experiences of a particularly disagreeable nature,
which firmly determined me to cut myself off entirely from the necessity of
returned playfully to the ways of their childhood. When they sang children’s
duets, Minna, though she had had no musical training, always managed
very cleverly to sing seconds, and afterwards, as we sat at our evening
meal, eating Russian salad, salt salmon from the Dwina, or fresh Russian
caviare, we were all three very cheerful and happy far away in our northern
home.
Amalie’s beautiful voice and real vocal talent at first won for her a very
favourable reception with the public, a fact which did us all a great deal of
good. Being, however, very short, and having no very great gift for acting,
the scope of her powers was very limited, and as she was soon surpassed by
more successful competitors, it was a real stroke of good luck for her that a
young officer in the Russian army, then Captain, now General, Carl von
Meek, fell head over ears in love with the simple girl, and married her a
year later. The unfortunate part of this engagement, however, was that it
caused many difficulties, and brought the first cloud over our menage a
trois. For, after a while, the two sisters quarrelled bitterly, and I had the very
unpleasant experience of living for a whole year in the same house with two
relatives who neither saw nor spoke to each other.
We spent the winter at the beginning of 1838 in a very small dingy
dwelling in the old town; it was not till the spring that we moved into a
pleasanter house in the more salubrious Petersburg suburb, where, in spite
of the sisterly breach before referred to, we led a fairly bright and cheerful
life, as we were often able to entertain many of our friends and
acquaintances in a simple though pleasant fashion. In addition to members
of the stage I knew a few people in the town, and we received and visited
the family of Dorn, the musical director, with whom I became quite
intimate. But it was the second musical director, Franz Lobmann, a very
worthy though not a very gifted man, who became most faithfully attached
to me. However, I did not cultivate many acquaintances in wider circles,
and they grew fewer as the ruling passion of my life grew steadily stronger;
so that when, later on, I left Riga, after spending nearly two years there, I
departed almost as a stranger, and with as much indifference as I had left
Magdeburg and Königsberg. What, however, specially embittered my
departure was a series of experiences of a particularly disagreeable nature,
which firmly determined me to cut myself off entirely from the necessity of
Page 173
mixing with any people like those I had met with in my previous attempts
to create a position for myself at the theatre.
Yet it was only gradually that I became quite conscious of all this. At
first, under the safe guidance of my renewed wedded happiness, which had
for a time been so disturbed in its early days, I felt distinctly better than I
had before in all my professional work. The fact that the material position
of the theatrical undertaking was assured exercised a healthy influence on
the performances. The theatre itself was cooped up in a very narrow space;
there was as little room for scenic display on its tiny stage as there was
accommodation for rich musical effects in the cramped orchestra. In both
directions the strictest limits were imposed, yet I contrived to introduce
considerable reinforcements into an orchestra which was really only
calculated for a string quartette, two first and two second violins, two
violas, and one ‘cello. These successful exertions of mine were the first
cause of the dislike Holtei evinced towards me later on. After this we were
able to get good concerted music for the opera. I found the thorough study
of Mehul’s opera, Joseph in Aegypten, very stimulating. Its noble and
simple style, added to the touching effect of the music, which quite carries
one away, did much towards effecting a favourable change in my taste, till
then warped by my connection with the theatre.
It was most gratifying to feel my former serious taste again aroused by
really good dramatic performances. I specially remember a production of
King Lear, which I followed with the greatest interest, not only at the actual
performances, but at all the rehearsals as well. Yet these educative
impressions tended to make me feel ever more and more dissatisfied with
my work at the theatre. On the one hand, the members of the company
became gradually more distasteful to me, and on the other I was growing
discontented with the management. With regard to the staff of the theatre, I
very soon found out the hollowness, vanity, and the impudent selfishness of
this uncultured and undisciplined class of people, for I had now lost my
former liking for the Bohemian life that had such an attraction for me at
Magdeburg. Before long there were but a few members of our company
with whom I had not quarrelled, thanks to one or the other of these
drawbacks. But my saddest experience was, that in such disputes, into
which in fact I was led simply by my zeal for the artistic success of the
performances as a whole, not only did I receive no support from Holtei, the
director, but I actually made him my enemy. He even declared publicly that
to create a position for myself at the theatre.
Yet it was only gradually that I became quite conscious of all this. At
first, under the safe guidance of my renewed wedded happiness, which had
for a time been so disturbed in its early days, I felt distinctly better than I
had before in all my professional work. The fact that the material position
of the theatrical undertaking was assured exercised a healthy influence on
the performances. The theatre itself was cooped up in a very narrow space;
there was as little room for scenic display on its tiny stage as there was
accommodation for rich musical effects in the cramped orchestra. In both
directions the strictest limits were imposed, yet I contrived to introduce
considerable reinforcements into an orchestra which was really only
calculated for a string quartette, two first and two second violins, two
violas, and one ‘cello. These successful exertions of mine were the first
cause of the dislike Holtei evinced towards me later on. After this we were
able to get good concerted music for the opera. I found the thorough study
of Mehul’s opera, Joseph in Aegypten, very stimulating. Its noble and
simple style, added to the touching effect of the music, which quite carries
one away, did much towards effecting a favourable change in my taste, till
then warped by my connection with the theatre.
It was most gratifying to feel my former serious taste again aroused by
really good dramatic performances. I specially remember a production of
King Lear, which I followed with the greatest interest, not only at the actual
performances, but at all the rehearsals as well. Yet these educative
impressions tended to make me feel ever more and more dissatisfied with
my work at the theatre. On the one hand, the members of the company
became gradually more distasteful to me, and on the other I was growing
discontented with the management. With regard to the staff of the theatre, I
very soon found out the hollowness, vanity, and the impudent selfishness of
this uncultured and undisciplined class of people, for I had now lost my
former liking for the Bohemian life that had such an attraction for me at
Magdeburg. Before long there were but a few members of our company
with whom I had not quarrelled, thanks to one or the other of these
drawbacks. But my saddest experience was, that in such disputes, into
which in fact I was led simply by my zeal for the artistic success of the
performances as a whole, not only did I receive no support from Holtei, the
director, but I actually made him my enemy. He even declared publicly that
Page 174
our theatre had become far too respectable for his taste, and tried to
convince me that good theatrical performances could not be given by a
strait-laced company.
In his opinion the idea of the dignity of theatrical art was pedantic
nonsense, and he thought light serio-comic vaudeville the only class of
performance worth considering. Serious opera, rich musical ensemble, was
his particular aversion, and my demands for this irritated him so that he met
them only with scorn and indignant refusals. Of the strange connection
between this artistic bias and his taste in the domain of morality I was also
to become aware, to my horror, in due course. For the present I felt so
repelled by the declaration of his artistic antipathies, as to let my dislike for
the theatre as a profession steadily grow upon me. I still took pleasure in
some good performances which I was able to get up, under favourable
circumstances, at the larger theatre at Mitau, to where the company went for
a time in the early part of the summer. Yet it was while I was there,
spending most of my time reading Bulwer Lytton’s novels, that I made a
secret resolve to try hard to free myself from all connection with the only
branch of theatrical art which had so far been open to me.
The composition of my Rienzi, the text of which I had finished in the
early days of my sojourn in Riga, was destined to bridge me over to the
glorious world for which I had longed so intensely. I had laid aside the
completion of my Gluckliche Barenfamilie, for the simple reason that the
lighter character of this piece would have thrown me more into contact with
the very theatrical people I most despised. My greatest consolation now was
to prepare Rienzi with such an utter disregard of the means which were
available there for its production, that my desire to produce it would force
me out of the narrow confines of this puny theatrical circle to seek a fresh
connection with one of the larger theatres. It was after our return from
Mitau, in the middle of the summer of 1838, that I set to work on this
composition, and by so doing roused myself to a state of enthusiasm which,
considering my position, was nothing less than desperate dare-devilry. All
to whom I confided my plan perceived at once, on the mere mention of my
subject, that I was preparing to break away from my present position, in
which there could be no possibility of producing my work, and I was
looked upon as light-headed and fit only for an asylum.
convince me that good theatrical performances could not be given by a
strait-laced company.
In his opinion the idea of the dignity of theatrical art was pedantic
nonsense, and he thought light serio-comic vaudeville the only class of
performance worth considering. Serious opera, rich musical ensemble, was
his particular aversion, and my demands for this irritated him so that he met
them only with scorn and indignant refusals. Of the strange connection
between this artistic bias and his taste in the domain of morality I was also
to become aware, to my horror, in due course. For the present I felt so
repelled by the declaration of his artistic antipathies, as to let my dislike for
the theatre as a profession steadily grow upon me. I still took pleasure in
some good performances which I was able to get up, under favourable
circumstances, at the larger theatre at Mitau, to where the company went for
a time in the early part of the summer. Yet it was while I was there,
spending most of my time reading Bulwer Lytton’s novels, that I made a
secret resolve to try hard to free myself from all connection with the only
branch of theatrical art which had so far been open to me.
The composition of my Rienzi, the text of which I had finished in the
early days of my sojourn in Riga, was destined to bridge me over to the
glorious world for which I had longed so intensely. I had laid aside the
completion of my Gluckliche Barenfamilie, for the simple reason that the
lighter character of this piece would have thrown me more into contact with
the very theatrical people I most despised. My greatest consolation now was
to prepare Rienzi with such an utter disregard of the means which were
available there for its production, that my desire to produce it would force
me out of the narrow confines of this puny theatrical circle to seek a fresh
connection with one of the larger theatres. It was after our return from
Mitau, in the middle of the summer of 1838, that I set to work on this
composition, and by so doing roused myself to a state of enthusiasm which,
considering my position, was nothing less than desperate dare-devilry. All
to whom I confided my plan perceived at once, on the mere mention of my
subject, that I was preparing to break away from my present position, in
which there could be no possibility of producing my work, and I was
looked upon as light-headed and fit only for an asylum.
Page 175
To all my acquaintances my procedure seemed stupid and reckless. Even
the former patron of my peculiar Leipzig overture thought it impracticable
and eccentric, seeing that I had again turned my back on light opera. He
expressed this opinion very freely in the Neue Zeitschrift fur Musik, in a
report of a concert I had given towards the end of the previous winter, and
openly ridiculed the Magdeburg Columbus Overture and the Rule Britannia
Overture previously mentioned. I myself had not taken any pleasure in the
performance of either of these overtures, as my predilection for cornets,
strongly marked in both these overtures, again played me a sorry trick, as I
had evidently expected too much of our Riga musicians, and had to endure
all kinds of disappointment on the occasion of the performance. As a
complete contrast to my extravagant setting of Rienzi, this same director, H.
Dorn, had set to work to write an opera in which he had most carefully
borne in mind the conditions obtaining at the Riga theatre. Der Schoffe van
Paris, an historical operetta of the period of the siege of Paris by Joan of
Arc, was practised and performed by us to the complete satisfaction of the
composer. However, the success of this work gave me no reason for
abandoning my project to complete my Rienzi, and I was secretly pleased to
find that I could regard this success without a trace of envy. Though
animated by no feeling of rivalry, I gradually gave up associating with the
Riga artists, confining myself chiefly to the performance of the duties I had
undertaken, and worked away at the two first acts of my big opera without
troubling myself at all whether I should ever get so far as to see it produced.
The serious and bitter experiences I had had so early in life had done
much to guide me towards that intensely earnest side of my nature that had
manifested itself in my earliest youth. The effect of these bitter experiences
was now to be still further emphasised by other sad impressions. Not long
after Minna had rejoined me, I received from home the news of the death of
my sister Rosalie. It was the first time in my life that I had experienced the
passing away of one near and dear to me. The death of this sister struck me
as a most cruel and significant blow of fate; it was out of love and respect
for her that I had turned away so resolutely from my youthful excesses, and
it was to gain her sympathy that I had devoted special thought and care to
my first great works. When the passions and cares of life had come upon
me and driven me away from my home, it was she who had read deep down
into my sorely stricken heart, and who had bidden me that anxious farewell
on my departure from Leipzig. At the time of my disappearance, when the
the former patron of my peculiar Leipzig overture thought it impracticable
and eccentric, seeing that I had again turned my back on light opera. He
expressed this opinion very freely in the Neue Zeitschrift fur Musik, in a
report of a concert I had given towards the end of the previous winter, and
openly ridiculed the Magdeburg Columbus Overture and the Rule Britannia
Overture previously mentioned. I myself had not taken any pleasure in the
performance of either of these overtures, as my predilection for cornets,
strongly marked in both these overtures, again played me a sorry trick, as I
had evidently expected too much of our Riga musicians, and had to endure
all kinds of disappointment on the occasion of the performance. As a
complete contrast to my extravagant setting of Rienzi, this same director, H.
Dorn, had set to work to write an opera in which he had most carefully
borne in mind the conditions obtaining at the Riga theatre. Der Schoffe van
Paris, an historical operetta of the period of the siege of Paris by Joan of
Arc, was practised and performed by us to the complete satisfaction of the
composer. However, the success of this work gave me no reason for
abandoning my project to complete my Rienzi, and I was secretly pleased to
find that I could regard this success without a trace of envy. Though
animated by no feeling of rivalry, I gradually gave up associating with the
Riga artists, confining myself chiefly to the performance of the duties I had
undertaken, and worked away at the two first acts of my big opera without
troubling myself at all whether I should ever get so far as to see it produced.
The serious and bitter experiences I had had so early in life had done
much to guide me towards that intensely earnest side of my nature that had
manifested itself in my earliest youth. The effect of these bitter experiences
was now to be still further emphasised by other sad impressions. Not long
after Minna had rejoined me, I received from home the news of the death of
my sister Rosalie. It was the first time in my life that I had experienced the
passing away of one near and dear to me. The death of this sister struck me
as a most cruel and significant blow of fate; it was out of love and respect
for her that I had turned away so resolutely from my youthful excesses, and
it was to gain her sympathy that I had devoted special thought and care to
my first great works. When the passions and cares of life had come upon
me and driven me away from my home, it was she who had read deep down
into my sorely stricken heart, and who had bidden me that anxious farewell
on my departure from Leipzig. At the time of my disappearance, when the
Page 176
news of my wilful marriage and of my consequent unfortunate position
reached my family, it was she who, as my mother informed me later, never
lost her faith in me, but who always cherished the hope that I would one
day reach the full development of my capabilities and make a genuine
success of my life.
Now, at the news of her death, and illuminated by the recollection of that
one impressive farewell, as by a flash of lightning I saw the immense value
my relations with this sister had been to me, and I did not fully realise the
extent of her influence until later on, when, after my first striking successes,
my mother tearfully lamented that Rosalie had not lived to witness them. It
really did me good to be again in communication with my family. My
mother and sisters had had news of my doings somehow or other, and I was
deeply touched, in the letters which I was now receiving from them, to hear
no reproaches anent my headstrong and apparently heartless behaviour, but
only sympathy and heartfelt solicitude. My family had also received
favourable reports about my wife’s good qualities, a fact about which I was
particularly glad, as I was thus spared the difficulties of defending her
questionable behaviour to me, which I should have been at pains to excuse.
This produced a salutary calm in my soul, which had so recently been a
prey to the worst anxieties. All that had driven me with such passionate
haste to an improvident and premature marriage, all that had consequently
weighed on me so ruinously, now seemed set at rest, leaving peace in its
stead. And although the ordinary cares of life still pressed on me for many
years, often in a most vexatious and troublesome form, yet the anxieties
attendant on my ardent youthful wishes were in a manner subdued and
calm. From thence forward till the attainment of my professional
independence, all my life’s struggles could be directed entirely towards that
more ideal aim which, from the time of the conception of my Rienzi, was to
be my only guide through life.
It was only later that I first realised the real character of my life in Riga,
from the utterance of one of its inhabitants, who was astonished to learn of
the success of a man of whose importance, during the whole of his two
years’ sojourn in the small capital of Livonia, nothing had been known.
Thrown entirely on my own resources, I was a stranger to every one. As I
mentioned before, I kept aloof from all the theatre folk, in consequence of
my increasing dislike of them, and therefore, when at the end of March,
1839, at the close of my second winter there, I was given my dismissal by
reached my family, it was she who, as my mother informed me later, never
lost her faith in me, but who always cherished the hope that I would one
day reach the full development of my capabilities and make a genuine
success of my life.
Now, at the news of her death, and illuminated by the recollection of that
one impressive farewell, as by a flash of lightning I saw the immense value
my relations with this sister had been to me, and I did not fully realise the
extent of her influence until later on, when, after my first striking successes,
my mother tearfully lamented that Rosalie had not lived to witness them. It
really did me good to be again in communication with my family. My
mother and sisters had had news of my doings somehow or other, and I was
deeply touched, in the letters which I was now receiving from them, to hear
no reproaches anent my headstrong and apparently heartless behaviour, but
only sympathy and heartfelt solicitude. My family had also received
favourable reports about my wife’s good qualities, a fact about which I was
particularly glad, as I was thus spared the difficulties of defending her
questionable behaviour to me, which I should have been at pains to excuse.
This produced a salutary calm in my soul, which had so recently been a
prey to the worst anxieties. All that had driven me with such passionate
haste to an improvident and premature marriage, all that had consequently
weighed on me so ruinously, now seemed set at rest, leaving peace in its
stead. And although the ordinary cares of life still pressed on me for many
years, often in a most vexatious and troublesome form, yet the anxieties
attendant on my ardent youthful wishes were in a manner subdued and
calm. From thence forward till the attainment of my professional
independence, all my life’s struggles could be directed entirely towards that
more ideal aim which, from the time of the conception of my Rienzi, was to
be my only guide through life.
It was only later that I first realised the real character of my life in Riga,
from the utterance of one of its inhabitants, who was astonished to learn of
the success of a man of whose importance, during the whole of his two
years’ sojourn in the small capital of Livonia, nothing had been known.
Thrown entirely on my own resources, I was a stranger to every one. As I
mentioned before, I kept aloof from all the theatre folk, in consequence of
my increasing dislike of them, and therefore, when at the end of March,
1839, at the close of my second winter there, I was given my dismissal by
Page 177
the management, although this occurrence surprised me for other reasons,
yet I felt fully reconciled to this compulsory change in my life. The reasons
which led to this dismissal were, however, of such a nature that I could only
regard it as one of the most disagreeable experiences of my life. Once,
when I was lying dangerously ill, I heard of Holtei’s real feelings towards
me. I had caught a severe cold in the depth of winter at a theatrical
rehearsal, and it at once assumed a serious character, owing to the fact that
my nerves were in a state of constant irritation from the continual
annoyance and vexatious worry caused by the contemptible character of the
theatrical management. It was just at the time when a special performance
of the opera Norma was to be given by our company in Mitau. Holtei
insisted on my getting up from a sick-bed to make this wintry journey, and
thus to expose myself to the danger of seriously increasing my cold in the
icy theatre at Mitau. Typhoid fever was the consequence, and this pulled me
down to such an extent that Holtei, who heard of my condition, is said to
have remarked at the theatre that I should probably never conduct again,
and that, to all intents and purposes, ‘I was on my last legs.’ It was to a
splendid homoeopathic physician, Dr. Prutzer, that I owed my recovery and
my life. Not long after that Holtei left our theatre and Riga for ever; his
occupation there, with ‘the far too respectable conditions,’ as he expressed
it, had become intolerable to him. In addition, however, circumstances had
arisen in his domestic life (which had been much affected by the death of
his wife) which seemed to make him consider a complete break with Riga
eminently desirable. But to my astonishment I now first became aware that
I too had unconsciously been a sufferer from the troubles he had brought
upon himself. When Holtei’s successor in the management—Joseph
Hoffmann the singer—informed me that his predecessor had made it a
condition to his taking over the post that he should enter into the same
engagement that Holtei had made with the conductor Dorn for the post
which I had hitherto filled, and my reappointment had therefore been made
an impossibility, my wife met my astonishment at this news by giving me
the reason, of which for some considerable time past she had been well
aware, namely, Holtei’s special dislike of us both. When I was afterwards
informed by Minna of what had happened—she having purposely kept it
from me all this time, so as not to cause bad feeling between me and my
director—a ghastly light was thrown upon the whole affair. I did indeed
remember perfectly how, soon after Minna’s arrival in Riga, I had been
yet I felt fully reconciled to this compulsory change in my life. The reasons
which led to this dismissal were, however, of such a nature that I could only
regard it as one of the most disagreeable experiences of my life. Once,
when I was lying dangerously ill, I heard of Holtei’s real feelings towards
me. I had caught a severe cold in the depth of winter at a theatrical
rehearsal, and it at once assumed a serious character, owing to the fact that
my nerves were in a state of constant irritation from the continual
annoyance and vexatious worry caused by the contemptible character of the
theatrical management. It was just at the time when a special performance
of the opera Norma was to be given by our company in Mitau. Holtei
insisted on my getting up from a sick-bed to make this wintry journey, and
thus to expose myself to the danger of seriously increasing my cold in the
icy theatre at Mitau. Typhoid fever was the consequence, and this pulled me
down to such an extent that Holtei, who heard of my condition, is said to
have remarked at the theatre that I should probably never conduct again,
and that, to all intents and purposes, ‘I was on my last legs.’ It was to a
splendid homoeopathic physician, Dr. Prutzer, that I owed my recovery and
my life. Not long after that Holtei left our theatre and Riga for ever; his
occupation there, with ‘the far too respectable conditions,’ as he expressed
it, had become intolerable to him. In addition, however, circumstances had
arisen in his domestic life (which had been much affected by the death of
his wife) which seemed to make him consider a complete break with Riga
eminently desirable. But to my astonishment I now first became aware that
I too had unconsciously been a sufferer from the troubles he had brought
upon himself. When Holtei’s successor in the management—Joseph
Hoffmann the singer—informed me that his predecessor had made it a
condition to his taking over the post that he should enter into the same
engagement that Holtei had made with the conductor Dorn for the post
which I had hitherto filled, and my reappointment had therefore been made
an impossibility, my wife met my astonishment at this news by giving me
the reason, of which for some considerable time past she had been well
aware, namely, Holtei’s special dislike of us both. When I was afterwards
informed by Minna of what had happened—she having purposely kept it
from me all this time, so as not to cause bad feeling between me and my
director—a ghastly light was thrown upon the whole affair. I did indeed
remember perfectly how, soon after Minna’s arrival in Riga, I had been
Page 178
particularly pressed by Holtei not to prevent my wife’s engagement at the
theatre. I asked him to talk things quietly over with her, so that he might see
that Minna’s unwillingness rested on a mutual understanding, and not on
any jealousy on my part. I had intentionally given him the time when I was
engaged at the theatre on rehearsals for the necessary discussions with my
wife. At the end of these meetings I had, on my return, often found Minna
in a very excited condition, and at length she declared emphatically that
under no circumstances would she accept the engagement offered by Holtei.
I had also noticed in Minna’s demeanour towards me a strange anxiety to
know why I was not unwilling to allow Holtei to try to persuade her. Now
that the catastrophe had occurred, I learned that Holtei had in fact used
these interviews for making improper advances to my wife, the nature of
which I only realised with difficulty on further acquaintance with this man’s
peculiarities, and after having heard of other instances of a similar nature. I
then discovered that Holtei considered it an advantage to get himself talked
about in connection with pretty women, in order thus to divert the attention
of the public from other conduct even more disreputable. After this Minna
was exceedingly indignant at Holtei, who, finding his own suit rejected,
appeared as the medium for another suitor, on whose behalf he urged that
he would think none the worse of her for rejecting him, a grey-haired and
penniless man, but at the same time advocated the suit of Brandenburg, a
very wealthy and handsome young merchant. His fierce indignation at this
double repulse, his humiliation at having revealed his real nature to no
purpose, seems, to judge from Minna’s observations, to have been
exceedingly great. I now understood too well that his frequent and
profoundly contemptuous sallies against respectable actors and actresses
had not been mere spirited exaggerations, but that he had probably often
had to complain of being put thoroughly to shame on this account.
The fact that the playing of such criminal parts as the one he had had in
view with my wife was unable to divert the ever-increasing attention of the
outside world from his vicious and dissolute habits, does not seem to have
escaped him; for those behind the scenes told me candidly that it was owing
to the fear of very unpleasant revelations that he had suddenly decided to
give up his position at Riga altogether. Even in much later years I heard
about Holtei’s bitter dislike of me, a dislike which showed itself, among
other things, in his denunciation of The Music of the Future,[8] and of its
tendency to jeopardise the simplicity of pure sentiment. I have previously
theatre. I asked him to talk things quietly over with her, so that he might see
that Minna’s unwillingness rested on a mutual understanding, and not on
any jealousy on my part. I had intentionally given him the time when I was
engaged at the theatre on rehearsals for the necessary discussions with my
wife. At the end of these meetings I had, on my return, often found Minna
in a very excited condition, and at length she declared emphatically that
under no circumstances would she accept the engagement offered by Holtei.
I had also noticed in Minna’s demeanour towards me a strange anxiety to
know why I was not unwilling to allow Holtei to try to persuade her. Now
that the catastrophe had occurred, I learned that Holtei had in fact used
these interviews for making improper advances to my wife, the nature of
which I only realised with difficulty on further acquaintance with this man’s
peculiarities, and after having heard of other instances of a similar nature. I
then discovered that Holtei considered it an advantage to get himself talked
about in connection with pretty women, in order thus to divert the attention
of the public from other conduct even more disreputable. After this Minna
was exceedingly indignant at Holtei, who, finding his own suit rejected,
appeared as the medium for another suitor, on whose behalf he urged that
he would think none the worse of her for rejecting him, a grey-haired and
penniless man, but at the same time advocated the suit of Brandenburg, a
very wealthy and handsome young merchant. His fierce indignation at this
double repulse, his humiliation at having revealed his real nature to no
purpose, seems, to judge from Minna’s observations, to have been
exceedingly great. I now understood too well that his frequent and
profoundly contemptuous sallies against respectable actors and actresses
had not been mere spirited exaggerations, but that he had probably often
had to complain of being put thoroughly to shame on this account.
The fact that the playing of such criminal parts as the one he had had in
view with my wife was unable to divert the ever-increasing attention of the
outside world from his vicious and dissolute habits, does not seem to have
escaped him; for those behind the scenes told me candidly that it was owing
to the fear of very unpleasant revelations that he had suddenly decided to
give up his position at Riga altogether. Even in much later years I heard
about Holtei’s bitter dislike of me, a dislike which showed itself, among
other things, in his denunciation of The Music of the Future,[8] and of its
tendency to jeopardise the simplicity of pure sentiment. I have previously
Page 179
mentioned that he displayed so much personal animosity against me during
the latter part of the time we were together in Riga that he vented his
hostility upon me in every possible way. Up to that time I had felt inclined
to ascribe it to the divergence of our respective views on artistic points.
[8] Zukunftsmusik is a pamphlet revealing some of Wagner’s artistic aims and
aspirations, written 1860-61.—EDITOR.
To my dismay I now became aware that personal considerations alone
were at the bottom of all this, and I blushed to realise that by my former
unreserved confidence in a man whom I thought was absolutely honest, I
had based my knowledge of human nature on such very weak foundations.
But still greater was my disappointment when I discovered the real
character of my friend H. Dorn. During the whole time of our intercourse at
Riga, he, who formerly treated me more like a good-natured elder brother,
had become my most confidential friend. We saw and visited each other
almost daily, very frequently in our respective homes. I kept not a single
secret from him, and the performance of his Schoffe van Paris under my
direction was as successful as if it had been under his own. Now, when I
heard that my post had been given to him, I felt obliged to ask him about it,
in order to learn whether there was any mistake on his part as to my
intention regarding the position I had hitherto held. But from his letter in
reply I could clearly see that Dorn had really made use of Holtei’s dislike
for me to extract from him, before his departure, an arrangement which was
both binding on his successor and also in his (Dorn’s) own favour. As my
friend he ought to have known that he could benefit by this agreement only
in the event of my resigning my appointment in Riga, because in our
confidential conversations, which continued to the end, he always carefully
refrained from touching on the possibility of my going away or remaining.
In fact, he declared that Holtei had distinctly told him he would on no
account re-engage me, as I could not get on with the singers. He added that
after this one could not take it amiss if he, who had been inspired with fresh
enthusiasm for the theatre by the success of his Schoffe von Paris, had
seized and turned to his own advantage the chance offered to him.
Moreover, he had gathered from my confidential communications that I was
very awkwardly situated, and that, owing to my small salary having been
cut down by Holtei from the very beginning, I was in a very precarious
position on account of the demands of my creditors in Königsberg and
the latter part of the time we were together in Riga that he vented his
hostility upon me in every possible way. Up to that time I had felt inclined
to ascribe it to the divergence of our respective views on artistic points.
[8] Zukunftsmusik is a pamphlet revealing some of Wagner’s artistic aims and
aspirations, written 1860-61.—EDITOR.
To my dismay I now became aware that personal considerations alone
were at the bottom of all this, and I blushed to realise that by my former
unreserved confidence in a man whom I thought was absolutely honest, I
had based my knowledge of human nature on such very weak foundations.
But still greater was my disappointment when I discovered the real
character of my friend H. Dorn. During the whole time of our intercourse at
Riga, he, who formerly treated me more like a good-natured elder brother,
had become my most confidential friend. We saw and visited each other
almost daily, very frequently in our respective homes. I kept not a single
secret from him, and the performance of his Schoffe van Paris under my
direction was as successful as if it had been under his own. Now, when I
heard that my post had been given to him, I felt obliged to ask him about it,
in order to learn whether there was any mistake on his part as to my
intention regarding the position I had hitherto held. But from his letter in
reply I could clearly see that Dorn had really made use of Holtei’s dislike
for me to extract from him, before his departure, an arrangement which was
both binding on his successor and also in his (Dorn’s) own favour. As my
friend he ought to have known that he could benefit by this agreement only
in the event of my resigning my appointment in Riga, because in our
confidential conversations, which continued to the end, he always carefully
refrained from touching on the possibility of my going away or remaining.
In fact, he declared that Holtei had distinctly told him he would on no
account re-engage me, as I could not get on with the singers. He added that
after this one could not take it amiss if he, who had been inspired with fresh
enthusiasm for the theatre by the success of his Schoffe von Paris, had
seized and turned to his own advantage the chance offered to him.
Moreover, he had gathered from my confidential communications that I was
very awkwardly situated, and that, owing to my small salary having been
cut down by Holtei from the very beginning, I was in a very precarious
position on account of the demands of my creditors in Königsberg and
Page 180
Magdeburg. It appeared that these people had employed against me a
lawyer, who was a friend of Dorn’s, and that, consequently, he had come to
the conclusion that I would not be able to remain in Riga. Therefore, even
as my friend, he had felt his conscience quite clear in accepting Holtei’s
proposal.
In order not to leave him in the complacent enjoyment of this self-
deception, I put it clearly before him that he could not be ignorant of the
fact that a higher salary had been promised to me for the third year of my
contract; and that, by the establishment of orchestral concerts, which had
already made a favourable start, I now saw my way to getting free from
those long-standing debts, having already overcome the difficulties of the
removal and settling down. I also asked him how he would act if I saw it
was to my own interest to retain my post, and to call on him to resign his
agreement with Holtei, who, as a matter of fact, after his departure from
Riga, had withdrawn his alleged reason for my dismissal. To this I received
no answer, nor have I had one up to the present day; but, on the other hand,
in 1865, I was astonished to see Dorn enter my house in Munich
unannounced, and when to his joy I recognised him, he stepped up to me
with a gesture which clearly showed his intention of embracing me.
Although I managed to evade this, yet I soon saw the difficulty of
preventing him from addressing me with the familiar form of ‘thou,’ as the
attempt to do so would have necessitated explanations that would have been
a useless addition to all my worries just then; for it was the time when my
Tristan was being produced.
Such a man was Heinrich Dorn. Although, after the failure of three
operas, he had retired in disgust from the theatre to devote himself
exclusively to the commercial side of music, yet the success of his opera,
Der Schoffe von Paris, in Riga helped him back to a permanent place
among the dramatic musicians of Germany. But to this position he was first
dragged from obscurity, across the bridge of infidelity to his friend, and by
the aid of virtue in the person of Director Holtei, thanks to a magnanimous
oversight on the part of Franz Listz. The preference of King Friedrich
Wilhelm IV. for church scenes contributed to secure him eventually his
important position at the greatest lyric theatre in Germany, the Royal Opera
of Berlin. For he was prompted far less by his devotion to the dramatic
muse than by his desire to secure a good position in some important
German city, when, as already hinted, through Liszt’s recommendation he
lawyer, who was a friend of Dorn’s, and that, consequently, he had come to
the conclusion that I would not be able to remain in Riga. Therefore, even
as my friend, he had felt his conscience quite clear in accepting Holtei’s
proposal.
In order not to leave him in the complacent enjoyment of this self-
deception, I put it clearly before him that he could not be ignorant of the
fact that a higher salary had been promised to me for the third year of my
contract; and that, by the establishment of orchestral concerts, which had
already made a favourable start, I now saw my way to getting free from
those long-standing debts, having already overcome the difficulties of the
removal and settling down. I also asked him how he would act if I saw it
was to my own interest to retain my post, and to call on him to resign his
agreement with Holtei, who, as a matter of fact, after his departure from
Riga, had withdrawn his alleged reason for my dismissal. To this I received
no answer, nor have I had one up to the present day; but, on the other hand,
in 1865, I was astonished to see Dorn enter my house in Munich
unannounced, and when to his joy I recognised him, he stepped up to me
with a gesture which clearly showed his intention of embracing me.
Although I managed to evade this, yet I soon saw the difficulty of
preventing him from addressing me with the familiar form of ‘thou,’ as the
attempt to do so would have necessitated explanations that would have been
a useless addition to all my worries just then; for it was the time when my
Tristan was being produced.
Such a man was Heinrich Dorn. Although, after the failure of three
operas, he had retired in disgust from the theatre to devote himself
exclusively to the commercial side of music, yet the success of his opera,
Der Schoffe von Paris, in Riga helped him back to a permanent place
among the dramatic musicians of Germany. But to this position he was first
dragged from obscurity, across the bridge of infidelity to his friend, and by
the aid of virtue in the person of Director Holtei, thanks to a magnanimous
oversight on the part of Franz Listz. The preference of King Friedrich
Wilhelm IV. for church scenes contributed to secure him eventually his
important position at the greatest lyric theatre in Germany, the Royal Opera
of Berlin. For he was prompted far less by his devotion to the dramatic
muse than by his desire to secure a good position in some important
German city, when, as already hinted, through Liszt’s recommendation he
Page 181
was appointed musical director of Cologne Cathedral. During a fete
connected with the building of the cathedral he managed, as a musician, so
to work upon the Prussian monarch’s religious feelings, that he was
appointed to the dignified post of musical conductor at the Royal Theatre,
in which capacity he long continued to do honour to German dramatic
music in conjunction with Wilhelm Taubert.
I must give J. Hoffmann, who from this time forward was the manager of
the Riga theatre, the credit of having felt the treachery practised upon me
very deeply indeed. He told me that his contract with Dorn bound him only
for one year, and that the moment the twelve months had elapsed he wished
to come to a fresh agreement with me. As soon as this was known, my
patrons in Riga came forward with offers of teaching engagements and
arrangements for sundry concerts, by way of compensating me for the
year’s salary which I should lose by being away from my work as a
conductor. Though I was much gratified by these offers, yet, as I have
already pointed out, the longing to break loose from the kind of theatrical
life which I had experienced up to that time so possessed me that I
resolutely seized this chance of abandoning my former vocation for an
entirely new one. Not without some shrewdness, I played upon my wife’s
indignation at the treachery I had suffered, in order to make her fall in with
my eccentric notion of going to Paris. Already in my conception of Rienzi I
had dreamed of the most magnificent theatrical conditions, but now,
without halting at any intermediate stations, my one desire was to reach the
very heart of all European grand opera. While still in Magdeburg I had
made H. Konig’s romance, Die Hohe Braut, the subject of a grand opera in
five acts, and in the most luxurious French style. After the scenic draft of
this opera, which had been translated into French, was completely worked
out, I sent it from Königsberg to Scribe in Paris. With this manuscript I sent
a letter to the famous operatic poet, in which I suggested that he might
make use of my plot, on condition that he would secure me the composition
of the music for the Paris Opera House. To convince him of my ability to
compose Parisian operatic music, I also sent him the score of my
Liebesverbot. At the same time I wrote to Meyerbeer, informing him of my
plans, and begging him to support me. I was not at all disheartened at
receiving no reply, for I was content to know that now at last ‘I was in
communication with Paris.’ When, therefore, I started out upon my daring
journey from Riga, I seemed to have a comparatively serious object in view,
connected with the building of the cathedral he managed, as a musician, so
to work upon the Prussian monarch’s religious feelings, that he was
appointed to the dignified post of musical conductor at the Royal Theatre,
in which capacity he long continued to do honour to German dramatic
music in conjunction with Wilhelm Taubert.
I must give J. Hoffmann, who from this time forward was the manager of
the Riga theatre, the credit of having felt the treachery practised upon me
very deeply indeed. He told me that his contract with Dorn bound him only
for one year, and that the moment the twelve months had elapsed he wished
to come to a fresh agreement with me. As soon as this was known, my
patrons in Riga came forward with offers of teaching engagements and
arrangements for sundry concerts, by way of compensating me for the
year’s salary which I should lose by being away from my work as a
conductor. Though I was much gratified by these offers, yet, as I have
already pointed out, the longing to break loose from the kind of theatrical
life which I had experienced up to that time so possessed me that I
resolutely seized this chance of abandoning my former vocation for an
entirely new one. Not without some shrewdness, I played upon my wife’s
indignation at the treachery I had suffered, in order to make her fall in with
my eccentric notion of going to Paris. Already in my conception of Rienzi I
had dreamed of the most magnificent theatrical conditions, but now,
without halting at any intermediate stations, my one desire was to reach the
very heart of all European grand opera. While still in Magdeburg I had
made H. Konig’s romance, Die Hohe Braut, the subject of a grand opera in
five acts, and in the most luxurious French style. After the scenic draft of
this opera, which had been translated into French, was completely worked
out, I sent it from Königsberg to Scribe in Paris. With this manuscript I sent
a letter to the famous operatic poet, in which I suggested that he might
make use of my plot, on condition that he would secure me the composition
of the music for the Paris Opera House. To convince him of my ability to
compose Parisian operatic music, I also sent him the score of my
Liebesverbot. At the same time I wrote to Meyerbeer, informing him of my
plans, and begging him to support me. I was not at all disheartened at
receiving no reply, for I was content to know that now at last ‘I was in
communication with Paris.’ When, therefore, I started out upon my daring
journey from Riga, I seemed to have a comparatively serious object in view,
Page 182
and my Paris projects no longer struck me as being altogether in the air. In
addition to this I now heard that my youngest sister, Cecilia, had become
betrothed to a certain Eduard Avenarius, an employee of the Brockhaus
book-selling firm, and that he had undertaken the management of their Paris
branch. To him I applied for news of Scribe, and for an answer to the
application I had made to that gentleman some years previously. Avenarius
called on Scribe, and from him received an acknowledgment of the receipt
of my earlier communication. Scribe also showed that he had some
recollection of the subject itself; for he said that, so far as he could
remember, there was a joueuse de harpe in the piece, who was ill-treated by
her brother. The fact that this merely incidental item had alone remained in
his memory led me to conclude that he had not extended his acquaintance
with the piece beyond the first act, in which the item in question occurs.
When, moreover, I heard that he had nothing to say in regard to my score,
except that he had had portions of it played over to him by a pupil of the
Conservatoire, I really could not flatter myself that he had entered into
definite and conscious relations with me. And yet I had palpable evidence in
a letter of his to Avenarius, which the latter forwarded to me, that Scribe
had actually occupied himself with my work, and that I was indeed in
communication with him, and this letter of Scribe’s made such an
impression upon my wife, who was by no means inclined to be sanguine,
that she gradually overcame her apprehensions in regard to the Paris
adventure. At last it was fixed and settled that on the expiry of my second
year’s contract in Riga (that is to say, in the coming summer, 1839), we
should journey direct from Riga to Paris, in order that I might try my luck
there as a composer of opera.
The production of my Rienzi now began to assume greater importance.
The composition of its second act was finished before we started, and into
this I wove a heroic ballet of extravagant dimensions. It was now
imperative that I should speedily acquire a knowledge of French, a
language which, during my classical studies at the Grammar School, I had
contemptuously laid aside. As there were only four weeks in which to
recover the time I had lost, I engaged an excellent French master. But as I
soon realised that I could achieve but little in so short a time, I utilised the
hours of the lessons in order to obtain from him, under the pretence of
receiving instruction, an idiomatic translation of my Rienzi libretto. This I
wrote with red ink on such parts of the score as were finished, so that on
addition to this I now heard that my youngest sister, Cecilia, had become
betrothed to a certain Eduard Avenarius, an employee of the Brockhaus
book-selling firm, and that he had undertaken the management of their Paris
branch. To him I applied for news of Scribe, and for an answer to the
application I had made to that gentleman some years previously. Avenarius
called on Scribe, and from him received an acknowledgment of the receipt
of my earlier communication. Scribe also showed that he had some
recollection of the subject itself; for he said that, so far as he could
remember, there was a joueuse de harpe in the piece, who was ill-treated by
her brother. The fact that this merely incidental item had alone remained in
his memory led me to conclude that he had not extended his acquaintance
with the piece beyond the first act, in which the item in question occurs.
When, moreover, I heard that he had nothing to say in regard to my score,
except that he had had portions of it played over to him by a pupil of the
Conservatoire, I really could not flatter myself that he had entered into
definite and conscious relations with me. And yet I had palpable evidence in
a letter of his to Avenarius, which the latter forwarded to me, that Scribe
had actually occupied himself with my work, and that I was indeed in
communication with him, and this letter of Scribe’s made such an
impression upon my wife, who was by no means inclined to be sanguine,
that she gradually overcame her apprehensions in regard to the Paris
adventure. At last it was fixed and settled that on the expiry of my second
year’s contract in Riga (that is to say, in the coming summer, 1839), we
should journey direct from Riga to Paris, in order that I might try my luck
there as a composer of opera.
The production of my Rienzi now began to assume greater importance.
The composition of its second act was finished before we started, and into
this I wove a heroic ballet of extravagant dimensions. It was now
imperative that I should speedily acquire a knowledge of French, a
language which, during my classical studies at the Grammar School, I had
contemptuously laid aside. As there were only four weeks in which to
recover the time I had lost, I engaged an excellent French master. But as I
soon realised that I could achieve but little in so short a time, I utilised the
hours of the lessons in order to obtain from him, under the pretence of
receiving instruction, an idiomatic translation of my Rienzi libretto. This I
wrote with red ink on such parts of the score as were finished, so that on
Page 183
reaching Paris I might immediately submit my half-finished opera to French
judges of art.
Everything now seemed to be carefully prepared for my departure, and
all that remained to be done was to raise the necessary funds for my
undertaking. But in this respect the outlook was bad. The sale of our modest
household furniture, the proceeds of a benefit concert, and my meagre
savings only sufficed to satisfy the importunate demands of my creditors in
Magdeburg and Königsberg. I knew that if I were to devote all my cash to
this purpose, there would not be a farthing left. Some way out of the fix
must be found, and this our old Königsberg friend, Abraham Möller,
suggested in his usual flippant and obscure manner. Just at this critical
moment he paid us a second visit to Riga. I acquainted him with the
difficulties of our position, and all the obstacles which stood in the way of
my resolve to go to Paris. In his habitual laconical way he counselled me to
reserve all my savings for our journey, and to settle with my creditors when
my Parisian successes had provided the necessary means. To help us in
carrying out this plan, he offered to convey us in his carriage across the
Russian frontier at top speed to an East Prussian port. We should have to
cross the Russian frontier without passports, as these had been already
impounded by our foreign creditors. He assured us that we should find it
quite simple to carry out this very hazardous expedition, and declared that
he had a friend on a Prussian estate close to the frontier who would render
us very effective assistance. My eagerness to escape at any price from my
previous circumstances, and to enter with all possible speed upon the wider
field, in which I hoped very soon to realise my ambition, blinded me to all
the unpleasantnesses which the execution of his proposal must entail.
Director Hoffmann, who considered himself bound to serve me to the
utmost of his ability, facilitated my departure by allowing me to leave some
months before the expiration of my engagement. After continuing to
conduct the operatic portion of the Mitau theatrical season through the
month of June, we secretly started in a special coach hired by Möller and
under his protection. The goal of our journey was Paris, but many unheard-
of hardships were in store for us before we were to reach that city.
The sense of contentment involuntarily aroused by our passage through
the fruitful Courland in the luxuriant month of July, and by the sweet
illusion that now at last I had cut myself loose from a hateful existence, to
enter upon a new and boundless path of fortune, was disturbed from its very
judges of art.
Everything now seemed to be carefully prepared for my departure, and
all that remained to be done was to raise the necessary funds for my
undertaking. But in this respect the outlook was bad. The sale of our modest
household furniture, the proceeds of a benefit concert, and my meagre
savings only sufficed to satisfy the importunate demands of my creditors in
Magdeburg and Königsberg. I knew that if I were to devote all my cash to
this purpose, there would not be a farthing left. Some way out of the fix
must be found, and this our old Königsberg friend, Abraham Möller,
suggested in his usual flippant and obscure manner. Just at this critical
moment he paid us a second visit to Riga. I acquainted him with the
difficulties of our position, and all the obstacles which stood in the way of
my resolve to go to Paris. In his habitual laconical way he counselled me to
reserve all my savings for our journey, and to settle with my creditors when
my Parisian successes had provided the necessary means. To help us in
carrying out this plan, he offered to convey us in his carriage across the
Russian frontier at top speed to an East Prussian port. We should have to
cross the Russian frontier without passports, as these had been already
impounded by our foreign creditors. He assured us that we should find it
quite simple to carry out this very hazardous expedition, and declared that
he had a friend on a Prussian estate close to the frontier who would render
us very effective assistance. My eagerness to escape at any price from my
previous circumstances, and to enter with all possible speed upon the wider
field, in which I hoped very soon to realise my ambition, blinded me to all
the unpleasantnesses which the execution of his proposal must entail.
Director Hoffmann, who considered himself bound to serve me to the
utmost of his ability, facilitated my departure by allowing me to leave some
months before the expiration of my engagement. After continuing to
conduct the operatic portion of the Mitau theatrical season through the
month of June, we secretly started in a special coach hired by Möller and
under his protection. The goal of our journey was Paris, but many unheard-
of hardships were in store for us before we were to reach that city.
The sense of contentment involuntarily aroused by our passage through
the fruitful Courland in the luxuriant month of July, and by the sweet
illusion that now at last I had cut myself loose from a hateful existence, to
enter upon a new and boundless path of fortune, was disturbed from its very
Page 184
outset by the miserable inconveniences occasioned by the presence of a
huge Newfoundland dog called Robber. This beautiful creature, originally
the property of a Riga merchant, had, contrary to the nature of his race,
become devotedly attached to me. After I had left Riga, and during my long
stay in Mitau, Robber incessantly besieged my empty house, and so touched
the hearts of my landlord and the neighbours by his fidelity, that they sent
the dog after me by the conductor of the coach to Mitau, where I greeted
him with genuine effusion, and swore that, in spite of all difficulties, I
would never part with him again. Whatever might happen, the dog must go
with us to Paris. And yet, even to get him into the carriage proved almost
impossible. All my endeavours to find him a place in or about the vehicle
were in vain, and, to my great grief, I had to watch the huge northern beast,
with his shaggy coat, gallop all day long in the blazing sun beside the
carriage. At last, moved to pity by his exhaustion, and unable to bear the
sight any longer, I hit upon a most ingenious plan for bringing the great
animal with us into the carriage, where, in spite of its being full to
overflowing, he was just able to find room.
On the evening of the second day we reached the Russo-Prussian frontier.
Möller’s evident anxiety as to whether we should be able to cross it safely
showed us plainly that the matter was one of some danger. His good friend
from the other side duly turned up with a small carriage, as arranged, and in
this conveyance drove Minna, myself, and Robber through by paths to a
certain point, whence he led us on foot to a house of exceedingly suspicious
exterior, where, after handing us over to a guide, he left us. There we had to
wait until sundown, and had ample leisure in which to realise that we were
in a smugglers’ drinking den, which gradually became filled to suffocation
with Polish Jews of most forbidding aspect.
At last we were summoned to follow our guide. A few hundred feet away,
on the slope of a hill, lay the ditch which runs the whole length of the
Russian frontier, watched continually and at very narrow intervals by
Cossacks. Our chance was to utilise the few moments after the relief of the
watch, during which the sentinels were elsewhere engaged. We had,
therefore, to run at full speed down the hill, scramble through the ditch, and
then hurry along until we were beyond the range of the soldiers’ guns; for
the Cossacks were bound in case of discovery to fire upon us even on the
other side of the ditch. In spite of my almost passionate anxiety for Minna, I
had observed with singular pleasure the intelligent behaviour of Robber,
huge Newfoundland dog called Robber. This beautiful creature, originally
the property of a Riga merchant, had, contrary to the nature of his race,
become devotedly attached to me. After I had left Riga, and during my long
stay in Mitau, Robber incessantly besieged my empty house, and so touched
the hearts of my landlord and the neighbours by his fidelity, that they sent
the dog after me by the conductor of the coach to Mitau, where I greeted
him with genuine effusion, and swore that, in spite of all difficulties, I
would never part with him again. Whatever might happen, the dog must go
with us to Paris. And yet, even to get him into the carriage proved almost
impossible. All my endeavours to find him a place in or about the vehicle
were in vain, and, to my great grief, I had to watch the huge northern beast,
with his shaggy coat, gallop all day long in the blazing sun beside the
carriage. At last, moved to pity by his exhaustion, and unable to bear the
sight any longer, I hit upon a most ingenious plan for bringing the great
animal with us into the carriage, where, in spite of its being full to
overflowing, he was just able to find room.
On the evening of the second day we reached the Russo-Prussian frontier.
Möller’s evident anxiety as to whether we should be able to cross it safely
showed us plainly that the matter was one of some danger. His good friend
from the other side duly turned up with a small carriage, as arranged, and in
this conveyance drove Minna, myself, and Robber through by paths to a
certain point, whence he led us on foot to a house of exceedingly suspicious
exterior, where, after handing us over to a guide, he left us. There we had to
wait until sundown, and had ample leisure in which to realise that we were
in a smugglers’ drinking den, which gradually became filled to suffocation
with Polish Jews of most forbidding aspect.
At last we were summoned to follow our guide. A few hundred feet away,
on the slope of a hill, lay the ditch which runs the whole length of the
Russian frontier, watched continually and at very narrow intervals by
Cossacks. Our chance was to utilise the few moments after the relief of the
watch, during which the sentinels were elsewhere engaged. We had,
therefore, to run at full speed down the hill, scramble through the ditch, and
then hurry along until we were beyond the range of the soldiers’ guns; for
the Cossacks were bound in case of discovery to fire upon us even on the
other side of the ditch. In spite of my almost passionate anxiety for Minna, I
had observed with singular pleasure the intelligent behaviour of Robber,
Page 185
who, as though conscious of the danger, silently kept close to our side, and
entirely dispelled my fear that he would give trouble during our dangerous
passage. At last our trusted helpmeet reappeared, and was so delighted that
he hugged us all in his arms. Then, placing us once more in his carriage, he
drove us to the inn of the Prussian frontier village, where my friend Möller,
positively sick with anxiety, leaped sobbing and rejoicing out of bed to
greet us.
It was only now that I began to realise the danger to which I had exposed,
not only myself, but also my poor Minna, and the folly of which I had been
guilty through my ignorance of the terrible difficulties of secretly crossing
the frontier—difficulties concerning which Möller had foolishly allowed me
to remain in ignorance.
I was simply at a loss to convey to my poor exhausted wife how
extremely I regretted the whole affair.
And yet the difficulties we had just overcome were but the prelude to the
calamities incidental to this adventurous journey which had such a decisive
influence on my life. The following day, when, with courage renewed, we
drove through the rich plain of Tilsit to Arnau, near Königsberg, we
decided, as the next stage of our journey, to proceed from the Prussian
harbour of Pillau by sailing vessel to London. Our principal reason for this
was the consideration of the dog we had with us. It was the easiest way to
take him. To convey him by coach from Königsberg to Paris was out of the
question, and railways were unknown. But another consideration was our
budget; the whole result of my desperate efforts amounted to not quite one
hundred ducats, which were to cover not only the journey to Paris, but our
expenses there until I should have earned something. Therefore, after a few
days’ rest in the inn at Arnau, we drove to the little seaport town of Pillau,
again accompanied by Möller, in one of the ordinary local conveyances,
which was not much better than a wagon. In order to avoid Königsberg, we
passed through the smaller villages and over bad roads. Even this short
distance was not to be covered without accident. The clumsy conveyance
upset in a farmyard, and Minna was so severely indisposed by the accident,
owing to an internal shock, that I had to drag her—with the greatest
difficulty, as she was quite helpless—to a peasant’s house. The people were
surly and dirty, and the night we spent there was a painful one for the poor
sufferer. A delay of several days occurred before the departure of the Pillau
entirely dispelled my fear that he would give trouble during our dangerous
passage. At last our trusted helpmeet reappeared, and was so delighted that
he hugged us all in his arms. Then, placing us once more in his carriage, he
drove us to the inn of the Prussian frontier village, where my friend Möller,
positively sick with anxiety, leaped sobbing and rejoicing out of bed to
greet us.
It was only now that I began to realise the danger to which I had exposed,
not only myself, but also my poor Minna, and the folly of which I had been
guilty through my ignorance of the terrible difficulties of secretly crossing
the frontier—difficulties concerning which Möller had foolishly allowed me
to remain in ignorance.
I was simply at a loss to convey to my poor exhausted wife how
extremely I regretted the whole affair.
And yet the difficulties we had just overcome were but the prelude to the
calamities incidental to this adventurous journey which had such a decisive
influence on my life. The following day, when, with courage renewed, we
drove through the rich plain of Tilsit to Arnau, near Königsberg, we
decided, as the next stage of our journey, to proceed from the Prussian
harbour of Pillau by sailing vessel to London. Our principal reason for this
was the consideration of the dog we had with us. It was the easiest way to
take him. To convey him by coach from Königsberg to Paris was out of the
question, and railways were unknown. But another consideration was our
budget; the whole result of my desperate efforts amounted to not quite one
hundred ducats, which were to cover not only the journey to Paris, but our
expenses there until I should have earned something. Therefore, after a few
days’ rest in the inn at Arnau, we drove to the little seaport town of Pillau,
again accompanied by Möller, in one of the ordinary local conveyances,
which was not much better than a wagon. In order to avoid Königsberg, we
passed through the smaller villages and over bad roads. Even this short
distance was not to be covered without accident. The clumsy conveyance
upset in a farmyard, and Minna was so severely indisposed by the accident,
owing to an internal shock, that I had to drag her—with the greatest
difficulty, as she was quite helpless—to a peasant’s house. The people were
surly and dirty, and the night we spent there was a painful one for the poor
sufferer. A delay of several days occurred before the departure of the Pillau
Page 186
vessel, but this was welcome as a respite to allow of Minna’s recovery.
Finally, as the captain was to take us without a passport, our going on board
was accompanied by exceptional difficulties. We had to contrive to slip past
the harbour watch to our vessel in a small boat before daybreak. Once on
board, we still had the troublesome task of hauling Robber up the steep side
of the vessel without attracting attention, and after that to conceal ourselves
at once below deck, in order to escape the notice of officials visiting the
ship before its departure. The anchor was weighed, and at last, as the land
faded gradually out of sight, we thought we could breathe freely and feel at
ease.
We were on board a merchant vessel of the smallest type. She was called
the Thetis; a bust of the nymph was erected in the bows, and she carried a
crew of seven men, including the captain. With good weather, such as was
to be expected in summer, the journey to London was estimated to take
eight days. However, before we had left the Baltic, we were delayed by a
prolonged calm. I made use of the time to improve my knowledge of
French by the study of a novel, La Derniere Aldini, by George Sand. We
also derived some entertainment from associating with the crew. There was
an elderly and peculiarly taciturn sailor named Koske, whom we observed
carefully because Robber, who was usually so friendly, had taken an
irreconcilable dislike to him. Oddly enough, this fact was to add in some
degree to our troubles in the hour of danger. After seven days’ sailing we
were no further than Copenhagen, where, without leaving the vessel, we
seized an opportunity of making our very spare diet on board more bearable
by various purchases of food and drink. In good spirits we sailed past the
beautiful castle of Elsinore, the sight of which brought me into immediate
touch with my youthful impressions of Hamlet. We were sailing all
unsuspecting through the Cattegat to the Skagerack, when the wind, which
had at first been merely unfavourable, and had forced us to a process of
weary tacking, changed on the second day to a violent storm. For twenty-
four hours we had to struggle against it under disadvantages which were
quite new to us. In the captain’s painfully narrow cabin, in which one of us
was without a proper berth, we were a prey to sea-sickness and endless
alarms. Unfortunately, the brandy cask, at which the crew fortified
themselves during their strenuous work, was let into a hollow under the seat
on which I lay at full length. Now it happened to be Koske who came most
frequently in search of the refreshment which was such a nuisance to me,
Finally, as the captain was to take us without a passport, our going on board
was accompanied by exceptional difficulties. We had to contrive to slip past
the harbour watch to our vessel in a small boat before daybreak. Once on
board, we still had the troublesome task of hauling Robber up the steep side
of the vessel without attracting attention, and after that to conceal ourselves
at once below deck, in order to escape the notice of officials visiting the
ship before its departure. The anchor was weighed, and at last, as the land
faded gradually out of sight, we thought we could breathe freely and feel at
ease.
We were on board a merchant vessel of the smallest type. She was called
the Thetis; a bust of the nymph was erected in the bows, and she carried a
crew of seven men, including the captain. With good weather, such as was
to be expected in summer, the journey to London was estimated to take
eight days. However, before we had left the Baltic, we were delayed by a
prolonged calm. I made use of the time to improve my knowledge of
French by the study of a novel, La Derniere Aldini, by George Sand. We
also derived some entertainment from associating with the crew. There was
an elderly and peculiarly taciturn sailor named Koske, whom we observed
carefully because Robber, who was usually so friendly, had taken an
irreconcilable dislike to him. Oddly enough, this fact was to add in some
degree to our troubles in the hour of danger. After seven days’ sailing we
were no further than Copenhagen, where, without leaving the vessel, we
seized an opportunity of making our very spare diet on board more bearable
by various purchases of food and drink. In good spirits we sailed past the
beautiful castle of Elsinore, the sight of which brought me into immediate
touch with my youthful impressions of Hamlet. We were sailing all
unsuspecting through the Cattegat to the Skagerack, when the wind, which
had at first been merely unfavourable, and had forced us to a process of
weary tacking, changed on the second day to a violent storm. For twenty-
four hours we had to struggle against it under disadvantages which were
quite new to us. In the captain’s painfully narrow cabin, in which one of us
was without a proper berth, we were a prey to sea-sickness and endless
alarms. Unfortunately, the brandy cask, at which the crew fortified
themselves during their strenuous work, was let into a hollow under the seat
on which I lay at full length. Now it happened to be Koske who came most
frequently in search of the refreshment which was such a nuisance to me,
Page 187
and this in spite of the fact that on each occasion he had to encounter
Robber in mortal combat. The dog flew at him with renewed rage each time
he came climbing down the narrow steps. I was thus compelled to make
efforts which, in my state of complete exhaustion from sea-sickness,
rendered my condition every time more critical. At last, on 27th July, the
captain was compelled by the violence of the west wind to seek a harbour
on the Norwegian coast. And how relieved I was to behold that far-reaching
rocky coast, towards which we were being driven at such speed! A
Norwegian pilot came to meet us in a small boat, and, with experienced
hand, assumed control of the Thetis, whereupon in a very short time I was
to have one of the most marvellous and most beautiful impressions of my
life. What I had taken to be a continuous line of cliffs turned out on our
approach to be a series of separate rocks projecting from the sea. Having
sailed past them, we perceived that we were surrounded, not only in front
and at the sides, but also at our back, by these reefs, which closed in behind
us so near together that they seemed to form a single chain of rocks. At the
same time the hurricane was so broken by the rocks in our rear that the
further we sailed through this ever-changing labyrinth of projecting rocks,
the calmer the sea became, until at last the vessel’s progress was perfectly
smooth and quiet as we entered one of those long sea-roads running through
a giant ravine—for such the Norwegian fjords appeared to me.
A feeling of indescribable content came over me when the enormous
granite walls echoed the hail of the crew as they cast anchor and furled the
sails. The sharp rhythm of this call clung to me like an omen of good cheer,
and shaped itself presently into the theme of the seamen’s song in my
Fliegender Holländer. The idea of this opera was, even at that time, ever
present in my mind, and it now took on a definite poetic and musical colour
under the influence of my recent impressions. Well, our next move was to
go on shore. I learned that the little fishing village at which we landed was
called Sandwike, and was situated a few miles away from the much larger
town of Arendal. We were allowed to put up at the hospitable house of a
certain ship’s captain, who was then away at sea, and here we were able to
take the rest we so much needed, as the unabated violence of the wind in
the open detained us there two days. On 31st July the captain insisted on
leaving, despite the pilot’s warning. We had been on board the Thetis a few
hours, and were in the act of eating a lobster for the first time in our lives,
when the captain and the sailors began to swear violently at the pilot, whom
Robber in mortal combat. The dog flew at him with renewed rage each time
he came climbing down the narrow steps. I was thus compelled to make
efforts which, in my state of complete exhaustion from sea-sickness,
rendered my condition every time more critical. At last, on 27th July, the
captain was compelled by the violence of the west wind to seek a harbour
on the Norwegian coast. And how relieved I was to behold that far-reaching
rocky coast, towards which we were being driven at such speed! A
Norwegian pilot came to meet us in a small boat, and, with experienced
hand, assumed control of the Thetis, whereupon in a very short time I was
to have one of the most marvellous and most beautiful impressions of my
life. What I had taken to be a continuous line of cliffs turned out on our
approach to be a series of separate rocks projecting from the sea. Having
sailed past them, we perceived that we were surrounded, not only in front
and at the sides, but also at our back, by these reefs, which closed in behind
us so near together that they seemed to form a single chain of rocks. At the
same time the hurricane was so broken by the rocks in our rear that the
further we sailed through this ever-changing labyrinth of projecting rocks,
the calmer the sea became, until at last the vessel’s progress was perfectly
smooth and quiet as we entered one of those long sea-roads running through
a giant ravine—for such the Norwegian fjords appeared to me.
A feeling of indescribable content came over me when the enormous
granite walls echoed the hail of the crew as they cast anchor and furled the
sails. The sharp rhythm of this call clung to me like an omen of good cheer,
and shaped itself presently into the theme of the seamen’s song in my
Fliegender Holländer. The idea of this opera was, even at that time, ever
present in my mind, and it now took on a definite poetic and musical colour
under the influence of my recent impressions. Well, our next move was to
go on shore. I learned that the little fishing village at which we landed was
called Sandwike, and was situated a few miles away from the much larger
town of Arendal. We were allowed to put up at the hospitable house of a
certain ship’s captain, who was then away at sea, and here we were able to
take the rest we so much needed, as the unabated violence of the wind in
the open detained us there two days. On 31st July the captain insisted on
leaving, despite the pilot’s warning. We had been on board the Thetis a few
hours, and were in the act of eating a lobster for the first time in our lives,
when the captain and the sailors began to swear violently at the pilot, whom
Page 188
I could see at the helm, rigid with fear, striving to avoid a reef—barely
visible above the water—towards which our ship was being driven. Great
was our terror at this violent tumult, for we naturally thought ourselves in
the most extreme danger. The vessel did actually receive a severe shock,
which, to my vivid imagination, seemed like the splitting up of the whole
ship. Fortunately, however, it transpired that only the side of our vessel had
fouled the reef, and there was no immediate danger. Nevertheless, the
captain deemed it necessary to steer for a harbour to have the vessel
examined, and we returned to the coast and anchored at another point. The
captain then offered to take us in a small boat with two sailors to Tromsond,
a town of some importance situated at a few hours’ distance, where he had
to invite the harbour officials to examine his ship. This again proved a most
attractive and impressive excursion. The view of one fjord in particular,
which extended far inland, worked on my imagination like some unknown,
awe-inspiring desert. This impression was intensified, during a long walk
from Tromsond up to the plateau, by the terribly depressing effect of the
dun moors, bare of tree or shrub, boasting only a covering of scanty moss,
which stretch away to the horizon, and merge imperceptibly into the
gloomy sky. It was long after dark when we returned from this trip in our
little boat, and my wife was very anxious. The next morning (1st August),
reassured as to the condition of the vessel, and the wind favouring us, we
were able to go to sea without further hindrance.
After four days’ calm sailing a strong north wind arose, which drove us at
uncommon speed in the right direction. We began to think ourselves nearly
at the end of our journey when, on 6th August, the wind changed, and the
storm began to rage with unheard-of violence. On the 7th, a Wednesday, at
half-past two in the afternoon, we thought ourselves in imminent danger of
death. It was not the terrible force with which the vessel was hurled up and
down, entirely at the mercy of this sea monster, which appeared now as a
fathomless abyss, now as a steep mountain peak, that filled me with mortal
dread; my premonition of some terrible crisis was aroused by the
despondency of the crew, whose malignant glances seemed superstitiously
to point to us as the cause of the threatening disaster. Ignorant of the trifling
occasion for the secrecy of our journey, the thought may have occurred to
them that our need of escape had arisen from suspicious or even criminal
circumstances. The captain himself seemed, in his extreme distress, to
regret having taken us on board; for we had evidently brought him ill-luck
visible above the water—towards which our ship was being driven. Great
was our terror at this violent tumult, for we naturally thought ourselves in
the most extreme danger. The vessel did actually receive a severe shock,
which, to my vivid imagination, seemed like the splitting up of the whole
ship. Fortunately, however, it transpired that only the side of our vessel had
fouled the reef, and there was no immediate danger. Nevertheless, the
captain deemed it necessary to steer for a harbour to have the vessel
examined, and we returned to the coast and anchored at another point. The
captain then offered to take us in a small boat with two sailors to Tromsond,
a town of some importance situated at a few hours’ distance, where he had
to invite the harbour officials to examine his ship. This again proved a most
attractive and impressive excursion. The view of one fjord in particular,
which extended far inland, worked on my imagination like some unknown,
awe-inspiring desert. This impression was intensified, during a long walk
from Tromsond up to the plateau, by the terribly depressing effect of the
dun moors, bare of tree or shrub, boasting only a covering of scanty moss,
which stretch away to the horizon, and merge imperceptibly into the
gloomy sky. It was long after dark when we returned from this trip in our
little boat, and my wife was very anxious. The next morning (1st August),
reassured as to the condition of the vessel, and the wind favouring us, we
were able to go to sea without further hindrance.
After four days’ calm sailing a strong north wind arose, which drove us at
uncommon speed in the right direction. We began to think ourselves nearly
at the end of our journey when, on 6th August, the wind changed, and the
storm began to rage with unheard-of violence. On the 7th, a Wednesday, at
half-past two in the afternoon, we thought ourselves in imminent danger of
death. It was not the terrible force with which the vessel was hurled up and
down, entirely at the mercy of this sea monster, which appeared now as a
fathomless abyss, now as a steep mountain peak, that filled me with mortal
dread; my premonition of some terrible crisis was aroused by the
despondency of the crew, whose malignant glances seemed superstitiously
to point to us as the cause of the threatening disaster. Ignorant of the trifling
occasion for the secrecy of our journey, the thought may have occurred to
them that our need of escape had arisen from suspicious or even criminal
circumstances. The captain himself seemed, in his extreme distress, to
regret having taken us on board; for we had evidently brought him ill-luck
Page 189
on this familiar passage—usually a rapid and uncomplicated one, especially
in summer. At this particular moment there raged, beside the tempest on the
water, a furious thunderstorm overhead, and Minna expressed the fervent
wish to be struck by lightning with me rather than to sink, living, into the
fearful flood. She even begged me to bind her to me, so that we might not
be parted as we sank. Yet another night was spent amid these incessant
terrors, which only our extreme exhaustion helped to mitigate.
The following day the storm had subsided; the wind remained
unfavourable, but was mild. The captain now tried to find our bearings by
means of his astronomical instruments. He complained of the sky, which
had been overcast so many days, swore that he would give much for a
single glimpse of the sun or the stars, and did not conceal the uneasiness he
felt at not being able to indicate our whereabouts with certainty. He
consoled himself, however, by following a ship which was sailing some
knots ahead in the same direction, and whose movements he observed
closely through the telescope. Suddenly he sprang up in great alarm, and
gave a vehement order to change our course. He had seen the ship in front
go aground on a sand-bank, from which, he asserted, she could not extricate
herself; for he now realised that we were near the most dangerous part of
the belt of sand-banks bordering the Dutch coast for a considerable
distance. By dint of very skilful sailing, we were enabled to keep the
opposite course towards the English coast, which we in fact sighted on the
evening of 9th August, in the neighbourhood of Southwold. I felt new life
come into me when I saw in the far distance the English pilots racing for
our ship. As competition is free among pilots on the English coast, they
come out as far as possible to meet incoming vessels, even when the risks
are very great.
The winner in our case was a powerful grey-haired man, who, after much
vain battling with the seething waves, which tossed his light boat away
from our ship at each attempt, at last succeeded in boarding the Thetis. (Our
poor, hardly-used boat still bore the name, although the wooden figure-head
of our patron nymph had been hurled into the sea during our first storm in
the Cattegat—an ill-omened incident in the eyes of the crew.) We were
filled with pious gratitude when this quiet English sailor, whose hands were
torn and bleeding from his repeated efforts to catch the rope thrown to him
on his approach, took over the rudder. His whole personality impressed us
most agreeably, and he seemed to us the absolute guarantee of a speedy
in summer. At this particular moment there raged, beside the tempest on the
water, a furious thunderstorm overhead, and Minna expressed the fervent
wish to be struck by lightning with me rather than to sink, living, into the
fearful flood. She even begged me to bind her to me, so that we might not
be parted as we sank. Yet another night was spent amid these incessant
terrors, which only our extreme exhaustion helped to mitigate.
The following day the storm had subsided; the wind remained
unfavourable, but was mild. The captain now tried to find our bearings by
means of his astronomical instruments. He complained of the sky, which
had been overcast so many days, swore that he would give much for a
single glimpse of the sun or the stars, and did not conceal the uneasiness he
felt at not being able to indicate our whereabouts with certainty. He
consoled himself, however, by following a ship which was sailing some
knots ahead in the same direction, and whose movements he observed
closely through the telescope. Suddenly he sprang up in great alarm, and
gave a vehement order to change our course. He had seen the ship in front
go aground on a sand-bank, from which, he asserted, she could not extricate
herself; for he now realised that we were near the most dangerous part of
the belt of sand-banks bordering the Dutch coast for a considerable
distance. By dint of very skilful sailing, we were enabled to keep the
opposite course towards the English coast, which we in fact sighted on the
evening of 9th August, in the neighbourhood of Southwold. I felt new life
come into me when I saw in the far distance the English pilots racing for
our ship. As competition is free among pilots on the English coast, they
come out as far as possible to meet incoming vessels, even when the risks
are very great.
The winner in our case was a powerful grey-haired man, who, after much
vain battling with the seething waves, which tossed his light boat away
from our ship at each attempt, at last succeeded in boarding the Thetis. (Our
poor, hardly-used boat still bore the name, although the wooden figure-head
of our patron nymph had been hurled into the sea during our first storm in
the Cattegat—an ill-omened incident in the eyes of the crew.) We were
filled with pious gratitude when this quiet English sailor, whose hands were
torn and bleeding from his repeated efforts to catch the rope thrown to him
on his approach, took over the rudder. His whole personality impressed us
most agreeably, and he seemed to us the absolute guarantee of a speedy
Page 190
deliverance from our terrible afflictions. We rejoiced too soon, however, for
we still had before us the perilous passage through the sand-banks off the
English coast, where, as I was assured, nearly four hundred ships are
wrecked on an average every year. We were fully twenty-four hours (from
the evening of the 10th to the 11th of August) amid these sandbanks,
fighting a westerly gale, which hindered our progress so seriously that we
only reached the mouth of the Thames on the evening of the 12th of August.
My wife had, up to that point, been so nervously affected by the
innumerable danger signals, consisting chiefly of small guardships painted
bright red and provided with bells on account of the fog, that she could not
close her eyes, day or night, for the excitement of watching for them and
pointing them out to the sailors. I, on the contrary, found these heralds of
human proximity and deliverance so consoling that, despite Minna’s
reproaches, I indulged in a long refreshing sleep. Now that we were
anchored in the mouth of the Thames, waiting for daybreak, I found myself
in the best of spirits; I dressed, washed, and even shaved myself up on deck
near the mast, while Minna and the whole exhausted crew were wrapped in
deep slumber. And with deepening interest I watched the growing signs of
life in this famous estuary. Our desire for a complete release from our
detested confinement led us, after we had sailed a little way up, to hasten
our arrival in London by going on board a passing steamer at Gravesend. As
we neared the capital, our astonishment steadily increased at the number of
ships of all sorts that filled the river, the houses, the streets, the famous
docks, and other maritime constructions which lined the banks. When at last
we reached London Bridge, this incredibly crowded centre of the greatest
city in the world, and set foot on land after our terrible three weeks’ voyage,
a pleasurable sensation of giddiness overcame us as our legs carried us
staggering through the deafening uproar. Robber seemed to be similarly
affected, for he whisked round the corners like a mad thing, and threatened
to get lost every other minute. But we soon sought safety in a cab, which
took us, on our captain’s recommendation, to the Horseshoe Tavern, near
the Tower, and here we had to make our plans for the conquest of this giant
metropolis.
The neighbourhood in which we found ourselves was such that we
decided to leave it with all possible haste. A very friendly little
hunchbacked Jew from Hamburg suggested better quarters in the West End,
and I remember vividly our drive there, in one of the tiny narrow cabs then
we still had before us the perilous passage through the sand-banks off the
English coast, where, as I was assured, nearly four hundred ships are
wrecked on an average every year. We were fully twenty-four hours (from
the evening of the 10th to the 11th of August) amid these sandbanks,
fighting a westerly gale, which hindered our progress so seriously that we
only reached the mouth of the Thames on the evening of the 12th of August.
My wife had, up to that point, been so nervously affected by the
innumerable danger signals, consisting chiefly of small guardships painted
bright red and provided with bells on account of the fog, that she could not
close her eyes, day or night, for the excitement of watching for them and
pointing them out to the sailors. I, on the contrary, found these heralds of
human proximity and deliverance so consoling that, despite Minna’s
reproaches, I indulged in a long refreshing sleep. Now that we were
anchored in the mouth of the Thames, waiting for daybreak, I found myself
in the best of spirits; I dressed, washed, and even shaved myself up on deck
near the mast, while Minna and the whole exhausted crew were wrapped in
deep slumber. And with deepening interest I watched the growing signs of
life in this famous estuary. Our desire for a complete release from our
detested confinement led us, after we had sailed a little way up, to hasten
our arrival in London by going on board a passing steamer at Gravesend. As
we neared the capital, our astonishment steadily increased at the number of
ships of all sorts that filled the river, the houses, the streets, the famous
docks, and other maritime constructions which lined the banks. When at last
we reached London Bridge, this incredibly crowded centre of the greatest
city in the world, and set foot on land after our terrible three weeks’ voyage,
a pleasurable sensation of giddiness overcame us as our legs carried us
staggering through the deafening uproar. Robber seemed to be similarly
affected, for he whisked round the corners like a mad thing, and threatened
to get lost every other minute. But we soon sought safety in a cab, which
took us, on our captain’s recommendation, to the Horseshoe Tavern, near
the Tower, and here we had to make our plans for the conquest of this giant
metropolis.
The neighbourhood in which we found ourselves was such that we
decided to leave it with all possible haste. A very friendly little
hunchbacked Jew from Hamburg suggested better quarters in the West End,
and I remember vividly our drive there, in one of the tiny narrow cabs then
Page 191
in use, the journey lasting fully an hour. They were built to carry two
people, who had to sit facing each other, and we therefore had to lay our big
dog crosswise from window to window. The sights we saw from our
whimsical nook surpassed anything we had imagined, and we arrived at our
boarding-house in Old Compton Street agreeably stimulated by the life and
the overwhelming size of the great city. Although at the age of twelve I had
made what I supposed to be a translation of a monologue from
Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, I found my knowledge of English quite
inadequate when it came to conversing with the landlady of the King’s
Arms. But the good dame’s social condition as a sea-captain’s widow led
her to think she could talk French to me, and her attempts made me wonder
which of us knew least of that language. And then a most disturbing
incident occurred—we missed Robber, who must have run away at the door
instead of following us into the house. Our distress at having lost our good
dog after having brought him all the way there with such difficulty occupied
us exclusively during the first two hours we spent in this new home on land.
We kept constant watch at the window until, of a sudden, we joyfully
recognised Robber strolling unconcernedly towards the house from a side
street. Afterwards we learned that our truant had wandered as far as Oxford
Street in search of adventures, and I have always considered his amazing
return to a house which he had not even entered as a strong proof of the
absolute certainty of the animal’s instincts in the matter of memory.
We now had time to realise the tiresome after-effects of the voyage. The
continuous swaying of the floor and our clumsy efforts to keep from falling
we found fairly entertaining; but when we came to take our well-earned rest
in the huge English double bed, and found that that too rocked up and
down, it became quite unbearable. Every time we closed our eyes we sank
into frightful abysses, and, springing up again, cried out for help. It seemed
as if that terrible voyage would go on to the end of our lives. Added to this
we felt miserably sick; for, after the atrocious food on board, we had been
only too ready to partake, with less discretion than relish, of tastier fare.
We were so exhausted by all these trials that we forgot to consider what
was, after all, the vital question—the probable result in hard cash. Indeed,
the marvels of the great city proved so fascinating, that we started off in a
cab, for all the world as if we were on a pleasure trip, to follow up a plan I
had sketched on my map of London. In our wonder and delight at what we
saw, we quite forgot all we had gone through. Costly as it proved, I
people, who had to sit facing each other, and we therefore had to lay our big
dog crosswise from window to window. The sights we saw from our
whimsical nook surpassed anything we had imagined, and we arrived at our
boarding-house in Old Compton Street agreeably stimulated by the life and
the overwhelming size of the great city. Although at the age of twelve I had
made what I supposed to be a translation of a monologue from
Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, I found my knowledge of English quite
inadequate when it came to conversing with the landlady of the King’s
Arms. But the good dame’s social condition as a sea-captain’s widow led
her to think she could talk French to me, and her attempts made me wonder
which of us knew least of that language. And then a most disturbing
incident occurred—we missed Robber, who must have run away at the door
instead of following us into the house. Our distress at having lost our good
dog after having brought him all the way there with such difficulty occupied
us exclusively during the first two hours we spent in this new home on land.
We kept constant watch at the window until, of a sudden, we joyfully
recognised Robber strolling unconcernedly towards the house from a side
street. Afterwards we learned that our truant had wandered as far as Oxford
Street in search of adventures, and I have always considered his amazing
return to a house which he had not even entered as a strong proof of the
absolute certainty of the animal’s instincts in the matter of memory.
We now had time to realise the tiresome after-effects of the voyage. The
continuous swaying of the floor and our clumsy efforts to keep from falling
we found fairly entertaining; but when we came to take our well-earned rest
in the huge English double bed, and found that that too rocked up and
down, it became quite unbearable. Every time we closed our eyes we sank
into frightful abysses, and, springing up again, cried out for help. It seemed
as if that terrible voyage would go on to the end of our lives. Added to this
we felt miserably sick; for, after the atrocious food on board, we had been
only too ready to partake, with less discretion than relish, of tastier fare.
We were so exhausted by all these trials that we forgot to consider what
was, after all, the vital question—the probable result in hard cash. Indeed,
the marvels of the great city proved so fascinating, that we started off in a
cab, for all the world as if we were on a pleasure trip, to follow up a plan I
had sketched on my map of London. In our wonder and delight at what we
saw, we quite forgot all we had gone through. Costly as it proved, I
Page 192
considered our week’s stay justified in view of Minna’s need of rest in the
first place, and secondly, the excellent opportunity it afforded me of making
acquaintances in the musical world. During my last visit to Dresden I had
sent Rule Britannia, the overture composed at Königsberg, to Sir John
Smart, president of the Philharmonic Society. It is true he had never
acknowledged it, but I felt it the more incumbent on me to bring him to task
about it. I therefore spent some days trying to find out where he lived,
wondering meanwhile in which language I should have to make myself
understood, but as the result of my inquiries I discovered that Smart was not
in London at all. I next persuaded myself that it would be a good thing to
look up Bulwer Lytton, and to come to an understanding about the operatic
performance of his novel, Rienzi, which I had dramatised. Having been
told, on the continent, that Bulwer was a member of Parliament, I went to
the House, after a few days, to inquire on the spot. My total ignorance of
the English language stood me in good stead here, and I was treated with
unexpected consideration; for, as none of the lower officials in that vast
building could make out what I wanted, I was sent, step by step, to one high
dignitary after the other, until at last I was introduced to a distinguished-
looking man, who came out of a large hall as we passed, as an entirely
unintelligible individual. (Minna was with me all the time; only Robber. had
been left behind at the King’s Arms.) He asked me very civilly what I
wanted, in French, and seemed favourably impressed when I inquired for
the celebrated author. He was obliged to tell me, however, that he was not in
London. I went on to ask whether I could not be admitted to a debate, but
was told that, in consequence of the old Houses of Parliament having been
burnt down, they were using temporary premises where the space was so
limited that only a few favoured visitors could procure cards of admittance.
But on my pressing more urgently he relented, and shortly after opened a
door leading direct into the strangers’ seats in the House of Lords. It seemed
reasonable to conclude from this that our friend was a lord in person. I was
immensely interested to see and hear the Premier, Lord Melbourne, and
Brougham (who seemed to me to take a very active part in the proceedings,
prompting Melbourne several times, as I thought), and the Duke of
Wellington, who looked so comfortable in his grey beaver hat, with his
hands diving deep into his trousers pockets, and who made his speech in so
conversational a tone that I lost my feeling of excessive awe. He had a
curious way, too, of accenting his points of special emphasis by shaking his
first place, and secondly, the excellent opportunity it afforded me of making
acquaintances in the musical world. During my last visit to Dresden I had
sent Rule Britannia, the overture composed at Königsberg, to Sir John
Smart, president of the Philharmonic Society. It is true he had never
acknowledged it, but I felt it the more incumbent on me to bring him to task
about it. I therefore spent some days trying to find out where he lived,
wondering meanwhile in which language I should have to make myself
understood, but as the result of my inquiries I discovered that Smart was not
in London at all. I next persuaded myself that it would be a good thing to
look up Bulwer Lytton, and to come to an understanding about the operatic
performance of his novel, Rienzi, which I had dramatised. Having been
told, on the continent, that Bulwer was a member of Parliament, I went to
the House, after a few days, to inquire on the spot. My total ignorance of
the English language stood me in good stead here, and I was treated with
unexpected consideration; for, as none of the lower officials in that vast
building could make out what I wanted, I was sent, step by step, to one high
dignitary after the other, until at last I was introduced to a distinguished-
looking man, who came out of a large hall as we passed, as an entirely
unintelligible individual. (Minna was with me all the time; only Robber. had
been left behind at the King’s Arms.) He asked me very civilly what I
wanted, in French, and seemed favourably impressed when I inquired for
the celebrated author. He was obliged to tell me, however, that he was not in
London. I went on to ask whether I could not be admitted to a debate, but
was told that, in consequence of the old Houses of Parliament having been
burnt down, they were using temporary premises where the space was so
limited that only a few favoured visitors could procure cards of admittance.
But on my pressing more urgently he relented, and shortly after opened a
door leading direct into the strangers’ seats in the House of Lords. It seemed
reasonable to conclude from this that our friend was a lord in person. I was
immensely interested to see and hear the Premier, Lord Melbourne, and
Brougham (who seemed to me to take a very active part in the proceedings,
prompting Melbourne several times, as I thought), and the Duke of
Wellington, who looked so comfortable in his grey beaver hat, with his
hands diving deep into his trousers pockets, and who made his speech in so
conversational a tone that I lost my feeling of excessive awe. He had a
curious way, too, of accenting his points of special emphasis by shaking his
Page 193
whole body, I was also much interested in Lord Lyndhurst, Brougham’s
particular enemy, and was amazed to see Brougham go across several times
to sit down coolly beside him, apparently with a view to prompting even his
opponent. The matter in hand was, as I learned afterwards from the papers,
the discussion of measures to be taken against the Portuguese Government
to ensure the passing of the Anti-Slavery Bill. The Bishop of London, who
was one of the speakers on this occasion, was the only one of these
gentlemen whose voice and manner seemed to me stiff or unnatural, but
possibly I was prejudiced by my dislike of parsons generally.
particular enemy, and was amazed to see Brougham go across several times
to sit down coolly beside him, apparently with a view to prompting even his
opponent. The matter in hand was, as I learned afterwards from the papers,
the discussion of measures to be taken against the Portuguese Government
to ensure the passing of the Anti-Slavery Bill. The Bishop of London, who
was one of the speakers on this occasion, was the only one of these
gentlemen whose voice and manner seemed to me stiff or unnatural, but
possibly I was prejudiced by my dislike of parsons generally.
Page 194
After this pleasing adventure I imagined I had exhausted the attractions
of London for the present, for although I could not gain admittance to the
Lower House, my untiring friend, whom I came across again as I went out,
showed me the room where the Commons sat, explained as much as was
necessary, and gave me a sight of the Speaker’s woolsack, and of his mace
lying hidden under the table. He also gave me such careful details of
various things that I felt I knew all there was to know about the capital of
Great Britain. I had not the smallest intention of going to the Italian opera,
possibly because I imagined the prices to be too ruinous. We thoroughly
explored all the principal streets, often tiring ourselves out; we shuddered
through a ghastly London Sunday, and wound up with a train trip (our very
first) to Gravesend Park, in the company of the captain of the Thetis. On the
20th of August we crossed over to France by steamer, arriving the same
evening at Boulogne-sur-mer, where we took leave of the sea with the
fervent desire never to go on it again.
We were both of us secretly convinced that we should meet with
disappointments in Paris, and it was partly on that account that we decided
to spend a few weeks at or near Boulogne. It was, in any case, too early in
the season to find the various important people whom I proposed to see, in
town; on the other hand, it seemed to me a most fortunate circumstance that
Meyerbeer should happen to be at Boulogne. Also, I had the
instrumentation of part of the second act of Rienzi to finish, and was bent
on having at least half of the work ready to show on my arrival in the costly
French capital. We therefore set out to find less expensive accommodation
in the country round Boulogne. Beginning with the immediate
neighbourhood, our search ended in our taking two practically unfurnished
rooms in the detached house of a rural wine merchant’s, situated on the
main road to Paris at half an hour’s distance from Boulogne. We next
provided scanty but adequate furniture, and in bringing our wits to bear
upon this matter Minna particularly distinguished herself. Besides a bed and
two chairs, we dug up a table, which, after I had cleared away my Rienzi
papers, served for our meals, which we had to prepare at our own fireside.
of London for the present, for although I could not gain admittance to the
Lower House, my untiring friend, whom I came across again as I went out,
showed me the room where the Commons sat, explained as much as was
necessary, and gave me a sight of the Speaker’s woolsack, and of his mace
lying hidden under the table. He also gave me such careful details of
various things that I felt I knew all there was to know about the capital of
Great Britain. I had not the smallest intention of going to the Italian opera,
possibly because I imagined the prices to be too ruinous. We thoroughly
explored all the principal streets, often tiring ourselves out; we shuddered
through a ghastly London Sunday, and wound up with a train trip (our very
first) to Gravesend Park, in the company of the captain of the Thetis. On the
20th of August we crossed over to France by steamer, arriving the same
evening at Boulogne-sur-mer, where we took leave of the sea with the
fervent desire never to go on it again.
We were both of us secretly convinced that we should meet with
disappointments in Paris, and it was partly on that account that we decided
to spend a few weeks at or near Boulogne. It was, in any case, too early in
the season to find the various important people whom I proposed to see, in
town; on the other hand, it seemed to me a most fortunate circumstance that
Meyerbeer should happen to be at Boulogne. Also, I had the
instrumentation of part of the second act of Rienzi to finish, and was bent
on having at least half of the work ready to show on my arrival in the costly
French capital. We therefore set out to find less expensive accommodation
in the country round Boulogne. Beginning with the immediate
neighbourhood, our search ended in our taking two practically unfurnished
rooms in the detached house of a rural wine merchant’s, situated on the
main road to Paris at half an hour’s distance from Boulogne. We next
provided scanty but adequate furniture, and in bringing our wits to bear
upon this matter Minna particularly distinguished herself. Besides a bed and
two chairs, we dug up a table, which, after I had cleared away my Rienzi
papers, served for our meals, which we had to prepare at our own fireside.
Page 195
While we were here I made my first call on Meyerbeer. I had often read
in the papers of his proverbial amiability, and bore him no ill-will for not
replying to my letter. My favourable opinion was soon to be confirmed,
however, by his kind reception of me. The impression he made was good in
every respect, particularly as regards his appearance. The years had not yet
given his features the flabby look which sooner or later mars most Jewish
faces, and the fine formation of his brow round about the eyes gave him an
expression of countenance that inspired confidence. He did not seem in the
least inclined to depreciate my intention of trying my luck in Paris as a
composer of opera; he allowed me to read him my libretto for Rienzi, and
really listened up to the end of the third act. He kept the two acts that were
complete, saying that he wished to look them over, and assured me, when I
again called on him, of his whole-hearted interest in my work. Be this as it
may, it annoyed me somewhat that he should again and again fall back on
praising my minute handwriting, an accomplishment he considered
especially Saxonian. He promised to give me letters of recommendation to
Duponchel, the manager of the Opera House, and to Habeneck, the
conductor. I now felt that I had good cause to extol my good fortune which,
after many vicissitudes, had sent me precisely to this particular spot in
France. What better fortune could have befallen me than to secure, in so
short a time, the sympathetic interest of the most famous composer of
French opera! Meyerbeer took me to see Moscheles, who was then in
Boulogne, and also Fraulein Blahedka, a celebrated virtuoso whose name I
had known for many years. I spent a few informal musical evenings at both
houses, and thus came into close touch with musical celebrities, an
experience quite new to me.
I had written to my future brother-in-law, Avernarius, in Paris, to ask him
to find us suitable accommodations, and we started on our journey thither
on 16th September in the diligence, my efforts to hoist Robber on to the top
being attended by the usual difficulties.
My first impression of Paris proved disappointing in view of the great
expectations I had cherished of that city; after London it seemed to me
narrow and confined. I had imagined the famous boulevards to be much
vaster, for instance, and was really annoyed, when the huge coach put us
down in the Rue de la Juissienne, to think that I should first set foot on
Parisian soil in such a wretched little alley. Neither did the Rue Richelieu,
where my brother-in-law had his book-shop, seem imposing after the streets
in the papers of his proverbial amiability, and bore him no ill-will for not
replying to my letter. My favourable opinion was soon to be confirmed,
however, by his kind reception of me. The impression he made was good in
every respect, particularly as regards his appearance. The years had not yet
given his features the flabby look which sooner or later mars most Jewish
faces, and the fine formation of his brow round about the eyes gave him an
expression of countenance that inspired confidence. He did not seem in the
least inclined to depreciate my intention of trying my luck in Paris as a
composer of opera; he allowed me to read him my libretto for Rienzi, and
really listened up to the end of the third act. He kept the two acts that were
complete, saying that he wished to look them over, and assured me, when I
again called on him, of his whole-hearted interest in my work. Be this as it
may, it annoyed me somewhat that he should again and again fall back on
praising my minute handwriting, an accomplishment he considered
especially Saxonian. He promised to give me letters of recommendation to
Duponchel, the manager of the Opera House, and to Habeneck, the
conductor. I now felt that I had good cause to extol my good fortune which,
after many vicissitudes, had sent me precisely to this particular spot in
France. What better fortune could have befallen me than to secure, in so
short a time, the sympathetic interest of the most famous composer of
French opera! Meyerbeer took me to see Moscheles, who was then in
Boulogne, and also Fraulein Blahedka, a celebrated virtuoso whose name I
had known for many years. I spent a few informal musical evenings at both
houses, and thus came into close touch with musical celebrities, an
experience quite new to me.
I had written to my future brother-in-law, Avernarius, in Paris, to ask him
to find us suitable accommodations, and we started on our journey thither
on 16th September in the diligence, my efforts to hoist Robber on to the top
being attended by the usual difficulties.
My first impression of Paris proved disappointing in view of the great
expectations I had cherished of that city; after London it seemed to me
narrow and confined. I had imagined the famous boulevards to be much
vaster, for instance, and was really annoyed, when the huge coach put us
down in the Rue de la Juissienne, to think that I should first set foot on
Parisian soil in such a wretched little alley. Neither did the Rue Richelieu,
where my brother-in-law had his book-shop, seem imposing after the streets
Page 196
in the west end of London. As for the chambre garnie, which had been
engaged for me in the Rue de la Tonnellerie, one of the narrow side-streets
which link the Rue St. Honore with the Marche des Innocents, I felt
positively degraded at having to take up my abode there. I needed all the
consolation that could be derived from an inscription, placed under a bust of
Moliere, which read: maison ou naquit Moliere, to raise my courage after
the mean impression the house had first made upon me. The room, which
had been prepared for us on the fourth floor, was small but cheerful,
decently furnished, and inexpensive. From the windows we could see the
frightful bustle in the market below, which became more and more alarming
as we watched it, and I wondered what we were doing in such a quarter.
Shortly after this, Avenarius had to go to Leipzig to bring home his bride,
my youngest sister Cecilia, after the wedding in that city. Before leaving, he
gave me an introduction to his only musical acquaintance, a German
holding an appointment in the music department of the Bibliotheque
Royale, named E. G. Anders, who lost no time in looking us up in Moliere’s
house. He was, as I soon discovered, a man of very unusual character, and,
little as he was able to help me, he left an affecting and ineffaceable
impression on my memory. He was a bachelor in the fifties, whose reverses
had driven him to the sad necessity of earning a living in Paris entirely
without assistance. He had fallen back on the extraordinary bibliographical
knowledge which, especially in reference to music, it had been his hobby to
acquire in the days of his prosperity. His real name he never told me,
wishing to guard the secret of that, as of his misfortunes, until after his
death. For the time being he told me only that he was known as Anders, was
of noble descent, and had held property on the Rhine, but that he had lost
everything owing to the villainous betrayal of his gullibility and good-
nature. The only thing he had managed to save was his very considerable
library, the size of which I was able to estimate for myself. It filled every
wall of his small dwelling. Even here in Paris he soon complained of bitter
enemies; for, in spite of having come furnished with an introduction to
influential people, he still held the inferior position of an employee in the
library. In spite of his long service there and his great learning, he had to see
really ignorant men promoted over his head. I discovered afterwards that
the real reason lay in his unbusinesslike methods, and the effeminacy
consequent on the delicate way in which he had been nurtured in early life,
which made him incapable of developing the energy necessary for his work.
engaged for me in the Rue de la Tonnellerie, one of the narrow side-streets
which link the Rue St. Honore with the Marche des Innocents, I felt
positively degraded at having to take up my abode there. I needed all the
consolation that could be derived from an inscription, placed under a bust of
Moliere, which read: maison ou naquit Moliere, to raise my courage after
the mean impression the house had first made upon me. The room, which
had been prepared for us on the fourth floor, was small but cheerful,
decently furnished, and inexpensive. From the windows we could see the
frightful bustle in the market below, which became more and more alarming
as we watched it, and I wondered what we were doing in such a quarter.
Shortly after this, Avenarius had to go to Leipzig to bring home his bride,
my youngest sister Cecilia, after the wedding in that city. Before leaving, he
gave me an introduction to his only musical acquaintance, a German
holding an appointment in the music department of the Bibliotheque
Royale, named E. G. Anders, who lost no time in looking us up in Moliere’s
house. He was, as I soon discovered, a man of very unusual character, and,
little as he was able to help me, he left an affecting and ineffaceable
impression on my memory. He was a bachelor in the fifties, whose reverses
had driven him to the sad necessity of earning a living in Paris entirely
without assistance. He had fallen back on the extraordinary bibliographical
knowledge which, especially in reference to music, it had been his hobby to
acquire in the days of his prosperity. His real name he never told me,
wishing to guard the secret of that, as of his misfortunes, until after his
death. For the time being he told me only that he was known as Anders, was
of noble descent, and had held property on the Rhine, but that he had lost
everything owing to the villainous betrayal of his gullibility and good-
nature. The only thing he had managed to save was his very considerable
library, the size of which I was able to estimate for myself. It filled every
wall of his small dwelling. Even here in Paris he soon complained of bitter
enemies; for, in spite of having come furnished with an introduction to
influential people, he still held the inferior position of an employee in the
library. In spite of his long service there and his great learning, he had to see
really ignorant men promoted over his head. I discovered afterwards that
the real reason lay in his unbusinesslike methods, and the effeminacy
consequent on the delicate way in which he had been nurtured in early life,
which made him incapable of developing the energy necessary for his work.
Page 197
On a miserable pittance of fifteen hundred francs a year, he led a weary
existence, full of anxiety. With nothing in view but a lonely old age, and the
probability of dying in a hospital, it seemed as if our society put new life
into him; for though we were poverty-stricken, we looked forward boldly
and hopefully to the future. My vivacity and invincible energy filled him
with hopes of my success, and from this time forward he took a most tender
and unselfish part in furthering my interests. Although he was a contributor
to the Gazette Musicale, edited by Moritz Schlesinger, he had never
succeeded in making his influence felt there in the slightest degree. He had
none of the versatility of a journalist, and the editors entrusted him with
little besides the preparation of bibliographical notes. Oddly enough, it was
with this unworldly and least resourceful of men that I had to discuss my
plan for the conquest of Paris, that is, of musical Paris, which is made up of
all the most questionable characters imaginable. The result was practically
always the same; we merely encouraged each other in the hope that some
unforeseen stroke of luck would help my cause.
To assist us in these discussions Anders called in his friend and
housemate Lehrs, a philologist, my acquaintance with whom was soon to
develop into one of the most beautiful friendships of my life. Lehrs was the
younger brother of a famous scholar at Königsberg. He had left there to
come to Paris some years before, with the object of gaining an independent
position by his philological work. This he preferred, in spite of the attendant
difficulties, to a post as teacher with a salary which only in Germany could
be considered sufficient for a scholar’s wants. He soon obtained work from
Didot, the bookseller, as assistant editor of a large edition of Greek classics,
but the editor traded on his poverty, and was much more concerned about
the success of his enterprise than about the condition of his poor
collaborator. Lehrs had therefore perpetually to struggle against poverty, but
he preserved an even temper, and showed himself in every way a model of
disinterestedness and self-sacrifice. At first he looked upon me only as a
man in need of advice, and incidentally a fellow-sufferer in Paris; for he had
no knowledge of music, and had no particular interest in it. We soon
became so intimate that I had him dropping in nearly every evening with
Anders, Lehrs being extremely useful to his friend, whose unsteadiness in
walking obliged him to use an umbrella and a walking-stick as crutches. He
was also nervous in crossing crowded thorough-fares, and particularly so at
night; while he always liked to make Lehrs cross my threshold in front of
existence, full of anxiety. With nothing in view but a lonely old age, and the
probability of dying in a hospital, it seemed as if our society put new life
into him; for though we were poverty-stricken, we looked forward boldly
and hopefully to the future. My vivacity and invincible energy filled him
with hopes of my success, and from this time forward he took a most tender
and unselfish part in furthering my interests. Although he was a contributor
to the Gazette Musicale, edited by Moritz Schlesinger, he had never
succeeded in making his influence felt there in the slightest degree. He had
none of the versatility of a journalist, and the editors entrusted him with
little besides the preparation of bibliographical notes. Oddly enough, it was
with this unworldly and least resourceful of men that I had to discuss my
plan for the conquest of Paris, that is, of musical Paris, which is made up of
all the most questionable characters imaginable. The result was practically
always the same; we merely encouraged each other in the hope that some
unforeseen stroke of luck would help my cause.
To assist us in these discussions Anders called in his friend and
housemate Lehrs, a philologist, my acquaintance with whom was soon to
develop into one of the most beautiful friendships of my life. Lehrs was the
younger brother of a famous scholar at Königsberg. He had left there to
come to Paris some years before, with the object of gaining an independent
position by his philological work. This he preferred, in spite of the attendant
difficulties, to a post as teacher with a salary which only in Germany could
be considered sufficient for a scholar’s wants. He soon obtained work from
Didot, the bookseller, as assistant editor of a large edition of Greek classics,
but the editor traded on his poverty, and was much more concerned about
the success of his enterprise than about the condition of his poor
collaborator. Lehrs had therefore perpetually to struggle against poverty, but
he preserved an even temper, and showed himself in every way a model of
disinterestedness and self-sacrifice. At first he looked upon me only as a
man in need of advice, and incidentally a fellow-sufferer in Paris; for he had
no knowledge of music, and had no particular interest in it. We soon
became so intimate that I had him dropping in nearly every evening with
Anders, Lehrs being extremely useful to his friend, whose unsteadiness in
walking obliged him to use an umbrella and a walking-stick as crutches. He
was also nervous in crossing crowded thorough-fares, and particularly so at
night; while he always liked to make Lehrs cross my threshold in front of
Page 198
him to distract the attention of Robber, of whom he stood in obvious terror.
Our usually good-natured dog became positively suspicious of this visitor,
and soon adopted towards him the same aggressive attitude which he had
shown to the sailor Koske on board the Thetis. The two men lived at an
hotel garni in Rue de Seine. They complained greatly of their landlady, who
appropriated so much of their income that they were entirely in her power.
Anders had for years been trying to assert his independence by leaving her,
without being able to carry out his plan. We soon threw off mutually every
shred of disguise as to the present state of our finances, so that, although the
two house-holds were actually separated, our common troubles gave us all
the intimacy of one united family.
The various ways by which I might obtain recognition in Paris formed
the chief topic of our discussions at that time. Our hopes were at first
centred on Meyerbeer’s promised letters of introduction. Duponchel, the
director of the Opera, did actually see me at his office, where, fixing a
monocle in his right eye, he read through Meyerbeer’s letter without
betraying the least emotion, having no doubt opened similar
communications from the composer many times before. I went away, and
never heard another word from him. The elderly conductor, Habeneck, on
the other hand, took an interest in my work that was not merely polite, and
acceded to my request to have something of mine played at one of the
orchestral practises at the Conservatoire as soon as he should have leisure. I
had, unfortunately, no short instrumental piece that seemed suitable except
my queer Columbus Overture, which I considered the most effective of all
that had emanated from my pen. It had been received with great applause
on the occasion of its performance in the theatre at Magdeburg, with the
assistance of the valiant trumpeters from the Prussian garrison. I gave
Habeneck the score and parts, and was able to report to our committee at
home that I had now one enterprise on foot.
I gave up the attempt to try and see Scribe on the mere ground of our
having had some correspondence, for my friends had made it clear to me, in
the light of their own experience, that it was out of the question to expect
this exceptionally busy author to occupy himself seriously with a young and
unknown musician. Anders was able to introduce me to another
acquaintance, however, a certain M. Dumersan. This grey-haired gentleman
had written some hundred vaudeville pieces, and would have been glad to
see one of them performed as an opera on a larger scale before his death. He
Our usually good-natured dog became positively suspicious of this visitor,
and soon adopted towards him the same aggressive attitude which he had
shown to the sailor Koske on board the Thetis. The two men lived at an
hotel garni in Rue de Seine. They complained greatly of their landlady, who
appropriated so much of their income that they were entirely in her power.
Anders had for years been trying to assert his independence by leaving her,
without being able to carry out his plan. We soon threw off mutually every
shred of disguise as to the present state of our finances, so that, although the
two house-holds were actually separated, our common troubles gave us all
the intimacy of one united family.
The various ways by which I might obtain recognition in Paris formed
the chief topic of our discussions at that time. Our hopes were at first
centred on Meyerbeer’s promised letters of introduction. Duponchel, the
director of the Opera, did actually see me at his office, where, fixing a
monocle in his right eye, he read through Meyerbeer’s letter without
betraying the least emotion, having no doubt opened similar
communications from the composer many times before. I went away, and
never heard another word from him. The elderly conductor, Habeneck, on
the other hand, took an interest in my work that was not merely polite, and
acceded to my request to have something of mine played at one of the
orchestral practises at the Conservatoire as soon as he should have leisure. I
had, unfortunately, no short instrumental piece that seemed suitable except
my queer Columbus Overture, which I considered the most effective of all
that had emanated from my pen. It had been received with great applause
on the occasion of its performance in the theatre at Magdeburg, with the
assistance of the valiant trumpeters from the Prussian garrison. I gave
Habeneck the score and parts, and was able to report to our committee at
home that I had now one enterprise on foot.
I gave up the attempt to try and see Scribe on the mere ground of our
having had some correspondence, for my friends had made it clear to me, in
the light of their own experience, that it was out of the question to expect
this exceptionally busy author to occupy himself seriously with a young and
unknown musician. Anders was able to introduce me to another
acquaintance, however, a certain M. Dumersan. This grey-haired gentleman
had written some hundred vaudeville pieces, and would have been glad to
see one of them performed as an opera on a larger scale before his death. He
Page 199
had no idea of standing on his dignity as an author, and was quite willing to
undertake the translation of an existing libretto into French verse. We
therefore entrusted him with the writing of my Liebesverbot, with a view to
a performance at the Theatre de la Renaissance, as it was then called. (It
was the third existing theatre for lyric drama, the performances being given
in the new Salle Ventadour, which had been rebuilt after its destruction by
fire.) On the understanding that it was to be a literal translation, he at once
turned the three numbers of my opera, for which I hoped to secure a
hearing, into neat French verse. Besides this, he asked me to compose a
chorus for a vaudeville entitled La Descente de la Courtille, which was to
be played at the Varietes during the carnival.
This was a second opening. My friends now strongly advised me to write
something small in the way of songs, which I could offer to popular singers
for concert purposes. Both Lehrs and Anders produced words for these.
Anders brought a very innocent Dors, mon enfant, written by a young poet
of his acquaintance; this was the first thing I composed to a French text. It
was so successful that, when I had tried it over softly several times on the
piano, my wife, who was in bed, called out to me that it was heavenly for
sending one to sleep. I also set L’Attente from Hugo’s Orientales, and
Ronsard’s song, Mignonne, to music. I have no reason to be ashamed of
these small pieces, which I published subsequently as a musical supplement
to Europa (Lewald’s publication) in 1841.
I next stumbled on the idea of writing a grand bass aria with a chorus, for
Lablache to introduce into his part of Orovist in Bellini’s Norma. Lehrs had
to hunt up an Italian political refugee to get the text out of him. This was
done, and I produced an effective composition a la Bellini (which still exists
among my manuscripts), and went off at once to offer it to Lablache.
The friendly Moor, who received me in the great singer’s anteroom,
insisted upon admitting me straight into his master’s presence without
announcing me. As I had anticipated some difficulty in getting near such a
celebrity, I had written my request, as I thought this would be simpler than
explaining verbally.
The black servant’s pleasant manner made me feel very uncomfortable; I
entrusted my score and letter to him to give to Lablache, without taking any
notice of his kindly astonishment at my refusal of his repeated invitation to
go into his master’s room and have an interview, and I left the house
undertake the translation of an existing libretto into French verse. We
therefore entrusted him with the writing of my Liebesverbot, with a view to
a performance at the Theatre de la Renaissance, as it was then called. (It
was the third existing theatre for lyric drama, the performances being given
in the new Salle Ventadour, which had been rebuilt after its destruction by
fire.) On the understanding that it was to be a literal translation, he at once
turned the three numbers of my opera, for which I hoped to secure a
hearing, into neat French verse. Besides this, he asked me to compose a
chorus for a vaudeville entitled La Descente de la Courtille, which was to
be played at the Varietes during the carnival.
This was a second opening. My friends now strongly advised me to write
something small in the way of songs, which I could offer to popular singers
for concert purposes. Both Lehrs and Anders produced words for these.
Anders brought a very innocent Dors, mon enfant, written by a young poet
of his acquaintance; this was the first thing I composed to a French text. It
was so successful that, when I had tried it over softly several times on the
piano, my wife, who was in bed, called out to me that it was heavenly for
sending one to sleep. I also set L’Attente from Hugo’s Orientales, and
Ronsard’s song, Mignonne, to music. I have no reason to be ashamed of
these small pieces, which I published subsequently as a musical supplement
to Europa (Lewald’s publication) in 1841.
I next stumbled on the idea of writing a grand bass aria with a chorus, for
Lablache to introduce into his part of Orovist in Bellini’s Norma. Lehrs had
to hunt up an Italian political refugee to get the text out of him. This was
done, and I produced an effective composition a la Bellini (which still exists
among my manuscripts), and went off at once to offer it to Lablache.
The friendly Moor, who received me in the great singer’s anteroom,
insisted upon admitting me straight into his master’s presence without
announcing me. As I had anticipated some difficulty in getting near such a
celebrity, I had written my request, as I thought this would be simpler than
explaining verbally.
The black servant’s pleasant manner made me feel very uncomfortable; I
entrusted my score and letter to him to give to Lablache, without taking any
notice of his kindly astonishment at my refusal of his repeated invitation to
go into his master’s room and have an interview, and I left the house
Page 200
hurriedly, intending to call for my answer in a few days. When I came back
Lablache received me most kindly, and assured me that my aria was
excellent, though it was impossible to introduce it into Bellini’s opera after
the latter had already been performed so very often. My relapse into the
domain of Bellini’s style, of which I had been guilty through the writing of
this aria, was therefore useless to me, and I soon became convinced of the
fruitlessness of my efforts in that direction. I saw that I should need
personal introductions to various singers in order to ensure the production
of one of my other compositions.
When Meyerbeer at last arrived in Paris, therefore, I was delighted. He
was not in the least astonished at the lack of success of his letters of
introduction; on the contrary, he made use of this opportunity to impress
upon me how difficult it was to get on in Paris, and how necessary it was
for me to look out for less pretentious work. With this object he introduced
me to Maurice Schlesinger, and leaving me at the mercy of that monstrous
person, went back to Germany.
At first Schlesinger did not know what to do with me; the acquaintances I
made through him (of whom the chief was the violinist Panofka) led to
nothing, and I therefore returned to my advisory board at home, through
whose influence I had recently received an order to compose the music to
the Two Grenadiers, by Heine, translated by a Parisian professor. I wrote
this song for baritone, and was very pleased with the result; on Ander’s
advice I now tried to find singers for my new compositions. Mme. Pauline
Viardot, on whom I first called, went through my songs with me. She was
very amiable, and praised them, but did not see why SHE should sing them.
I went through the same experience with a Mme. Widmann, a grand
contralto, who sang my Dors, mon enfant with great feeling; all the same
she had no further use for my composition. A certain M. Dupont, third tenor
at the grand opera, tried my setting of the Ronsard poem, but declared that
the language in which it was written was no longer palatable to the Paris
public. M. Geraldy, a favourite concert singer and teacher, who allowed me
to call and see him frequently, told me that the Two Grenadiers was
impossible, for the simple reason that the accompaniment at the end of the
song, which I had modelled upon the Marseillaise, could only be sung in the
streets of Paris to the accompaniment of cannons and gunshots. Habeneck
was the only person who fulfilled his promise to conduct my Columbus
Overture at one of the rehearsals for the benefit of Anders and myself. As,
Lablache received me most kindly, and assured me that my aria was
excellent, though it was impossible to introduce it into Bellini’s opera after
the latter had already been performed so very often. My relapse into the
domain of Bellini’s style, of which I had been guilty through the writing of
this aria, was therefore useless to me, and I soon became convinced of the
fruitlessness of my efforts in that direction. I saw that I should need
personal introductions to various singers in order to ensure the production
of one of my other compositions.
When Meyerbeer at last arrived in Paris, therefore, I was delighted. He
was not in the least astonished at the lack of success of his letters of
introduction; on the contrary, he made use of this opportunity to impress
upon me how difficult it was to get on in Paris, and how necessary it was
for me to look out for less pretentious work. With this object he introduced
me to Maurice Schlesinger, and leaving me at the mercy of that monstrous
person, went back to Germany.
At first Schlesinger did not know what to do with me; the acquaintances I
made through him (of whom the chief was the violinist Panofka) led to
nothing, and I therefore returned to my advisory board at home, through
whose influence I had recently received an order to compose the music to
the Two Grenadiers, by Heine, translated by a Parisian professor. I wrote
this song for baritone, and was very pleased with the result; on Ander’s
advice I now tried to find singers for my new compositions. Mme. Pauline
Viardot, on whom I first called, went through my songs with me. She was
very amiable, and praised them, but did not see why SHE should sing them.
I went through the same experience with a Mme. Widmann, a grand
contralto, who sang my Dors, mon enfant with great feeling; all the same
she had no further use for my composition. A certain M. Dupont, third tenor
at the grand opera, tried my setting of the Ronsard poem, but declared that
the language in which it was written was no longer palatable to the Paris
public. M. Geraldy, a favourite concert singer and teacher, who allowed me
to call and see him frequently, told me that the Two Grenadiers was
impossible, for the simple reason that the accompaniment at the end of the
song, which I had modelled upon the Marseillaise, could only be sung in the
streets of Paris to the accompaniment of cannons and gunshots. Habeneck
was the only person who fulfilled his promise to conduct my Columbus
Overture at one of the rehearsals for the benefit of Anders and myself. As,
Page 201
however, there was no question of producing this work even at one of the
celebrated Conservatoire concerts, I saw clearly that the old gentleman was
only moved by kindness and a desire to encourage me. It could not lead to
anything further, and I myself was convinced that this extremely superficial
work of my young days could only give the orchestra a wrong impression
of my talents. However, these rehearsals, to my surprise, made such an
unexpected impression on me in other ways that they exercised a decisive
influence in the crisis of my artistic development. This was due to the fact
that I listened repeatedly to Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, which, by dint of
untiring practice, received such a marvellous interpretation at the hands of
this celebrated orchestra, that the picture I had had of it in my mind in the
enthusiastic days of my youth now stood before me almost tangibly in
brilliant colours, undimmed, as though it had never been effaced by the
Leipzig orchestra who had slaughtered it under Pohlenz’s baton. Where
formerly I had only seen mystic constellations and weird shapes without
meaning, I now found, flowing from innumerable sources, a stream of the
most touching and heavenly melodies which delighted my heart.
The whole of that period of the deterioration of my musical tastes which
dated, practically speaking, from those selfsame confusing ideas about
Beethoven, and which had grown so much worse through my acquaintance
with that dreadful theatre—all these wrong views now sank down as if into
an abyss of shame and remorse.
This inner change had been gradually prepared by many painful
experiences during the last few years. I owed the recovery of my old vigour
and spirits to the deep impression the rendering of the Ninth Symphony had
made on me when performed in a way I had never dreamed of. This
important event in my life can only be compared to the upheaval caused
within me when, as a youth of sixteen, I saw Schroder-Devrient act in
Fidelio.
The direct result of this was my intense longing to compose something
that would give me a similar feeling of satisfaction, and this desire grew in
proportion to my anxiety about my unfortunate position in Paris, which
made me almost despair of success.
In this mood I sketched an overture to Faust which, according to my
original scheme, was only to form the first part of a whole Faust Symphony,
as I had already got the ‘Gretchen’ idea in my head for the second
celebrated Conservatoire concerts, I saw clearly that the old gentleman was
only moved by kindness and a desire to encourage me. It could not lead to
anything further, and I myself was convinced that this extremely superficial
work of my young days could only give the orchestra a wrong impression
of my talents. However, these rehearsals, to my surprise, made such an
unexpected impression on me in other ways that they exercised a decisive
influence in the crisis of my artistic development. This was due to the fact
that I listened repeatedly to Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, which, by dint of
untiring practice, received such a marvellous interpretation at the hands of
this celebrated orchestra, that the picture I had had of it in my mind in the
enthusiastic days of my youth now stood before me almost tangibly in
brilliant colours, undimmed, as though it had never been effaced by the
Leipzig orchestra who had slaughtered it under Pohlenz’s baton. Where
formerly I had only seen mystic constellations and weird shapes without
meaning, I now found, flowing from innumerable sources, a stream of the
most touching and heavenly melodies which delighted my heart.
The whole of that period of the deterioration of my musical tastes which
dated, practically speaking, from those selfsame confusing ideas about
Beethoven, and which had grown so much worse through my acquaintance
with that dreadful theatre—all these wrong views now sank down as if into
an abyss of shame and remorse.
This inner change had been gradually prepared by many painful
experiences during the last few years. I owed the recovery of my old vigour
and spirits to the deep impression the rendering of the Ninth Symphony had
made on me when performed in a way I had never dreamed of. This
important event in my life can only be compared to the upheaval caused
within me when, as a youth of sixteen, I saw Schroder-Devrient act in
Fidelio.
The direct result of this was my intense longing to compose something
that would give me a similar feeling of satisfaction, and this desire grew in
proportion to my anxiety about my unfortunate position in Paris, which
made me almost despair of success.
In this mood I sketched an overture to Faust which, according to my
original scheme, was only to form the first part of a whole Faust Symphony,
as I had already got the ‘Gretchen’ idea in my head for the second
Page 202
movement. This is the same composition that I rewrote in several parts
fifteen years later; I had forgotten all about it, and I owed its reconstruction
to the advice of Liszt, who gave me many valuable hints. This composition
has been performed many times under the title of eine Faust-ouverture, and
has met with great appreciation. At the time of which I am speaking, I
hoped that the Conservatoire orchestra would have been willing to give the
work a hearing, but I was told they thought they had done enough for me,
and hoped to be rid of me for some time.
Having failed everywhere, I now turned to Meyerbeer for more
introductions, especially to singers. I was very much surprised when, in
consequence of my request, Meyerbeer introduced me to a certain M.
Gouin, a post-office official, and Meyerbeer’s sole agent in Paris, whom he
instructed to do his utmost for me. Meyerbeer specially wished me to know
M. Antenor Joly, director of the Theatre de la Renaissance, the musical
theatre already mentioned. M. Gouin, with almost suspicious levity,
promised me to produce my opera Liebesverbot, which now only required
translation. There was a question of having a few numbers of my opera
sung to the committee of the theatre at a special audience. When I suggested
that some of the singers of this very theatre should undertake to sing three
of the numbers which had been already translated by Dumersan, I was
refused on the plea that all these artists were far too busy. But Gouin saw a
way out of the difficulty; on the authority of Maître Meyerbeer, he won
over to our cause several singers who were under an obligation to
Meyerbeer: Mme. Dorus-Gras, a real primadonna of the Grand Opera,
Mme. Widmann and M. Dupont (the two last-named had previously refused
to help me) now promised to sing for me at this audience.
This much, then, did I achieve in six months. It was now nearly Easter of
the year 1840. Encouraged by Gouin’s negotiations, which seemed to spell
hope, I made up my mind to move from the obscure Quartier des Innocents
to a part of Paris nearer to the musical centre; and in this I was encouraged
by Lehrs’ foolhardy advice.
What this change meant to me, my readers will learn when they hear
under what circumstances we had dragged on our existence during our stay
in Paris.
Although we were living in the cheapest possible way, dining at a very
small restaurant for a franc a head, it was impossible to prevent the rest of
fifteen years later; I had forgotten all about it, and I owed its reconstruction
to the advice of Liszt, who gave me many valuable hints. This composition
has been performed many times under the title of eine Faust-ouverture, and
has met with great appreciation. At the time of which I am speaking, I
hoped that the Conservatoire orchestra would have been willing to give the
work a hearing, but I was told they thought they had done enough for me,
and hoped to be rid of me for some time.
Having failed everywhere, I now turned to Meyerbeer for more
introductions, especially to singers. I was very much surprised when, in
consequence of my request, Meyerbeer introduced me to a certain M.
Gouin, a post-office official, and Meyerbeer’s sole agent in Paris, whom he
instructed to do his utmost for me. Meyerbeer specially wished me to know
M. Antenor Joly, director of the Theatre de la Renaissance, the musical
theatre already mentioned. M. Gouin, with almost suspicious levity,
promised me to produce my opera Liebesverbot, which now only required
translation. There was a question of having a few numbers of my opera
sung to the committee of the theatre at a special audience. When I suggested
that some of the singers of this very theatre should undertake to sing three
of the numbers which had been already translated by Dumersan, I was
refused on the plea that all these artists were far too busy. But Gouin saw a
way out of the difficulty; on the authority of Maître Meyerbeer, he won
over to our cause several singers who were under an obligation to
Meyerbeer: Mme. Dorus-Gras, a real primadonna of the Grand Opera,
Mme. Widmann and M. Dupont (the two last-named had previously refused
to help me) now promised to sing for me at this audience.
This much, then, did I achieve in six months. It was now nearly Easter of
the year 1840. Encouraged by Gouin’s negotiations, which seemed to spell
hope, I made up my mind to move from the obscure Quartier des Innocents
to a part of Paris nearer to the musical centre; and in this I was encouraged
by Lehrs’ foolhardy advice.
What this change meant to me, my readers will learn when they hear
under what circumstances we had dragged on our existence during our stay
in Paris.
Although we were living in the cheapest possible way, dining at a very
small restaurant for a franc a head, it was impossible to prevent the rest of
Page 203
our money from melting away. Our friend Möller had given us to
understand that we could ask him if we were in need, as he would put aside
for us the first money that came in from any successful business transaction.
There was no alternative but to apply to him for money; in the meantime we
pawned all the trinkets we possessed that were of any value. As I was too
shy to make inquiries about a pawnshop, I looked up the French equivalent
in the dictionary in order to be able to recognise such a place when I saw it.
In my little pocket dictionary I could not find any other word than
‘Lombard.’ On looking at a map of Paris I found, situated in the middle of
an inextricable maze of streets, a very small lane called Rue des Lombards.
Thither I wended my way, but my expedition was fruitless. Often, on
reading by the light of the transparent lanterns the inscription ‘Mont de
Piété,’ I became very curious to know its meaning, and on consulting my
advisory board at home about this ‘Mount of Piety,’[9] I was told, to my
great delight, that it was precisely there that I should find salvation. To this
‘Mont de Piété’ we now carried all we possessed in the way of silver,
namely, our wedding presents. After that followed my wife’s trinkets and
the rest of her former theatrical wardrobe, amongst which was a beautiful
silver-embroidered blue dress with a court train, once the property of the
Duchess of Dessau. Still we heard nothing from our friend Möller, and we
were obliged to wait on from day to day for the sorely needed help from
Königsberg, and at last, one dark day, we pledged our wedding rings. When
all hope of assistance seemed vain, I heard that the pawn-tickets themselves
were of some value, as they could be sold to buyers, who thereby acquired
the right to redeem the pawned articles. I had to resort even to this, and thus
the blue court-dress, for instance, was lost for ever. Möller never wrote
again. When later on he called on me at the time of my conductorship in
Dresden, he admitted that he had been embittered against me owing to
humiliating and derogatory remarks we were said to have made about him
after we parted, and had resolved not to have anything further to do with us.
We were certain of our innocence in the matter, and very grieved at having,
through pure slander, lost the chance of such assistance in our great need.
[9] This is the correct translation of the words Berg der Frömmigkeit used in the
original.—Editor.
At the beginning of our pecuniary difficulties we sustained a loss which
we looked upon as providential, in spite of the grief it caused us. This was
understand that we could ask him if we were in need, as he would put aside
for us the first money that came in from any successful business transaction.
There was no alternative but to apply to him for money; in the meantime we
pawned all the trinkets we possessed that were of any value. As I was too
shy to make inquiries about a pawnshop, I looked up the French equivalent
in the dictionary in order to be able to recognise such a place when I saw it.
In my little pocket dictionary I could not find any other word than
‘Lombard.’ On looking at a map of Paris I found, situated in the middle of
an inextricable maze of streets, a very small lane called Rue des Lombards.
Thither I wended my way, but my expedition was fruitless. Often, on
reading by the light of the transparent lanterns the inscription ‘Mont de
Piété,’ I became very curious to know its meaning, and on consulting my
advisory board at home about this ‘Mount of Piety,’[9] I was told, to my
great delight, that it was precisely there that I should find salvation. To this
‘Mont de Piété’ we now carried all we possessed in the way of silver,
namely, our wedding presents. After that followed my wife’s trinkets and
the rest of her former theatrical wardrobe, amongst which was a beautiful
silver-embroidered blue dress with a court train, once the property of the
Duchess of Dessau. Still we heard nothing from our friend Möller, and we
were obliged to wait on from day to day for the sorely needed help from
Königsberg, and at last, one dark day, we pledged our wedding rings. When
all hope of assistance seemed vain, I heard that the pawn-tickets themselves
were of some value, as they could be sold to buyers, who thereby acquired
the right to redeem the pawned articles. I had to resort even to this, and thus
the blue court-dress, for instance, was lost for ever. Möller never wrote
again. When later on he called on me at the time of my conductorship in
Dresden, he admitted that he had been embittered against me owing to
humiliating and derogatory remarks we were said to have made about him
after we parted, and had resolved not to have anything further to do with us.
We were certain of our innocence in the matter, and very grieved at having,
through pure slander, lost the chance of such assistance in our great need.
[9] This is the correct translation of the words Berg der Frömmigkeit used in the
original.—Editor.
At the beginning of our pecuniary difficulties we sustained a loss which
we looked upon as providential, in spite of the grief it caused us. This was
Page 204
our beautiful dog, which we had managed to bring across to Paris with
endless difficulty. As he was a very valuable animal, and attracted much
attention, he had probably been stolen. In spite of the terrible state of the
traffic in Paris, he had always found his way home in the same clever
manner in which he had mastered the difficulties of the London streets.
Quite at the beginning of our stay in Paris he had often gone off by himself
to the gardens of the Palais Royal, where he used to meet many of his
friends, and had returned safe and sound after a brilliant exhibition of
swimming and retrieving before an audience of gutter children. At the Quai
du Pont-neuf he generally begged us to let him bathe; there he used to draw
a large crowd of spectators round him, who were so loud in their
enthusiasm about the way in which he dived for and brought to land various
objects of clothing, tools, etc., that the police begged us to put an end to the
obstruction. One morning I let him out for a little run as usual; he never
returned, and in spite of our most strenuous efforts to recover him, no trace
of him was to be found. This loss seemed to many of our friends a piece of
luck, for they could not understand how it was possible for us to feed such a
huge animal when we ourselves had not enough to eat. About this time, the
second month of our stay in Paris, my sister Louisa came over from Leipzig
to join her husband, Friedrich Brockhaus, in Paris, where he had been
waiting for her for some time. They intended to go to Italy together, and
Louisa made use of this opportunity to buy all kinds of expensive things in
Paris. I did not expect them to feel any pity for us on account of our foolish
removal to Paris, and its attendant miseries, or that they should consider
themselves bound to help us in any way; but although we did not try to
conceal our position, we derived no benefit from the visit of our rich
relations. Minna was even kind enough to help my sister with her luxurious
shopping, and we were very anxious not to make them think we wanted to
rouse their pity. In return my sister introduced me to an extraordinary friend
of hers, who was destined to take a great interest in me. This was the young
painter, Ernst Kietz, from Dresden; he was an exceptionally kind-hearted
and unaffected young man, whose talent for portrait painting (in a sort of
coloured pastel style) had made him such a favourite in his own town, that
he had been induced by his financial successes to come to Paris for a time
to finish his art studies. He had now been working in Delaroche’s studio for
about a year. He had a curious and almost childlike disposition, and his lack
of all serious education, combined with a certain weakness of character, had
endless difficulty. As he was a very valuable animal, and attracted much
attention, he had probably been stolen. In spite of the terrible state of the
traffic in Paris, he had always found his way home in the same clever
manner in which he had mastered the difficulties of the London streets.
Quite at the beginning of our stay in Paris he had often gone off by himself
to the gardens of the Palais Royal, where he used to meet many of his
friends, and had returned safe and sound after a brilliant exhibition of
swimming and retrieving before an audience of gutter children. At the Quai
du Pont-neuf he generally begged us to let him bathe; there he used to draw
a large crowd of spectators round him, who were so loud in their
enthusiasm about the way in which he dived for and brought to land various
objects of clothing, tools, etc., that the police begged us to put an end to the
obstruction. One morning I let him out for a little run as usual; he never
returned, and in spite of our most strenuous efforts to recover him, no trace
of him was to be found. This loss seemed to many of our friends a piece of
luck, for they could not understand how it was possible for us to feed such a
huge animal when we ourselves had not enough to eat. About this time, the
second month of our stay in Paris, my sister Louisa came over from Leipzig
to join her husband, Friedrich Brockhaus, in Paris, where he had been
waiting for her for some time. They intended to go to Italy together, and
Louisa made use of this opportunity to buy all kinds of expensive things in
Paris. I did not expect them to feel any pity for us on account of our foolish
removal to Paris, and its attendant miseries, or that they should consider
themselves bound to help us in any way; but although we did not try to
conceal our position, we derived no benefit from the visit of our rich
relations. Minna was even kind enough to help my sister with her luxurious
shopping, and we were very anxious not to make them think we wanted to
rouse their pity. In return my sister introduced me to an extraordinary friend
of hers, who was destined to take a great interest in me. This was the young
painter, Ernst Kietz, from Dresden; he was an exceptionally kind-hearted
and unaffected young man, whose talent for portrait painting (in a sort of
coloured pastel style) had made him such a favourite in his own town, that
he had been induced by his financial successes to come to Paris for a time
to finish his art studies. He had now been working in Delaroche’s studio for
about a year. He had a curious and almost childlike disposition, and his lack
of all serious education, combined with a certain weakness of character, had
Page 205
made him choose a career in which he was destined, in spite of all his
talent, to fail hopelessly. I had every opportunity of recognising this, as I
saw a great deal of him. At the time, however, the simple-hearted devotion
and kindness of this young man were very welcome both to myself and my
wife, who often felt lonely, and his friendship was a real source of help in
our darkest hours of adversity. He became almost a member of the family,
and joined our home circle every night, providing a strange contrast to
nervous old Anders and the grave-faced Lehrs. His good-nature and his
quaint remarks soon made him indispensable to us; he amused us
tremendously with his French, into which he would launch with the greatest
confidence, although he could not put together two consecutive sentences
properly, in spite of having lived in Paris for twenty years. With Delaroche
he studied oil-painting, and had obviously considerable talent in this
direction, although it was the very rock on which he stranded. The mixing
of the colours on his palette, and especially the cleaning of his brushes, took
up so much of his time that he rarely came to the actual painting. As the
days were very short in midwinter, he never had time to do any work after
he had finished washing his palette and brushes, and, as far as I can
remember, he never completed a single portrait. Strangers to whom he had
been introduced, and who had given him orders to paint their portraits, were
obliged to leave Paris without seeing them even half done, and at last he
even complained because some of his sitters died before their portraits were
completed. His landlord, to whom he was always in debt for rent, was the
only creature who succeeded in getting a portrait of his ugly person from
the painter, and, as far as I know, this is the only finished portrait in
existence by Kietz. On the other hand, he was very clever at making little
sketches of any subject suggested by our conversation during the evening,
and in these he displayed both originality and delicacy of execution. During
the winter of that year he completed a good pencil portrait of me, which he
touched up two years afterwards when he knew me more intimately,
finishing it off as it now stands. It pleased him to sketch me in the attitude I
often assumed during our evening chats when I was in a cheerful mood. No
evening ever passed during which I did not succeed in shaking off the
depression caused by my vain endeavours, and by the many worries I had
gone through during the day, and in regaining my natural cheerfulness, and
Kietz was anxious to represent me to the world as a man who, in spite of the
hard times he had to face, had confidence in his success, and rose smiling
talent, to fail hopelessly. I had every opportunity of recognising this, as I
saw a great deal of him. At the time, however, the simple-hearted devotion
and kindness of this young man were very welcome both to myself and my
wife, who often felt lonely, and his friendship was a real source of help in
our darkest hours of adversity. He became almost a member of the family,
and joined our home circle every night, providing a strange contrast to
nervous old Anders and the grave-faced Lehrs. His good-nature and his
quaint remarks soon made him indispensable to us; he amused us
tremendously with his French, into which he would launch with the greatest
confidence, although he could not put together two consecutive sentences
properly, in spite of having lived in Paris for twenty years. With Delaroche
he studied oil-painting, and had obviously considerable talent in this
direction, although it was the very rock on which he stranded. The mixing
of the colours on his palette, and especially the cleaning of his brushes, took
up so much of his time that he rarely came to the actual painting. As the
days were very short in midwinter, he never had time to do any work after
he had finished washing his palette and brushes, and, as far as I can
remember, he never completed a single portrait. Strangers to whom he had
been introduced, and who had given him orders to paint their portraits, were
obliged to leave Paris without seeing them even half done, and at last he
even complained because some of his sitters died before their portraits were
completed. His landlord, to whom he was always in debt for rent, was the
only creature who succeeded in getting a portrait of his ugly person from
the painter, and, as far as I know, this is the only finished portrait in
existence by Kietz. On the other hand, he was very clever at making little
sketches of any subject suggested by our conversation during the evening,
and in these he displayed both originality and delicacy of execution. During
the winter of that year he completed a good pencil portrait of me, which he
touched up two years afterwards when he knew me more intimately,
finishing it off as it now stands. It pleased him to sketch me in the attitude I
often assumed during our evening chats when I was in a cheerful mood. No
evening ever passed during which I did not succeed in shaking off the
depression caused by my vain endeavours, and by the many worries I had
gone through during the day, and in regaining my natural cheerfulness, and
Kietz was anxious to represent me to the world as a man who, in spite of the
hard times he had to face, had confidence in his success, and rose smiling
Page 206
above the troubles of life. Before the end of the year 1839, my youngest
sister Cecilia also arrived in Paris with her husband, Edward Avenarius. It
was only natural that she should feel embarrassed at the idea of meeting us
in Paris in our extremely straitened circumstances, especially as her
husband was not very well off. Consequently, instead of calling on them
frequently, we preferred waiting until they came to see us, which, by the
way, took them a long time. On the other hand, the renewal of our
acquaintance with Heinrich Laube, who came over to Paris at the beginning
of 1840 with his young wife, Iduna (nee Budaus), was very cheering. She
was the widow of a wealthy Leipzig doctor, and Laube had married her
under very extraordinary circumstances, since we last saw him in Berlin;
they intended to enjoy themselves for a few months in Paris. During the
long period of his detention, while awaiting his trial, this young lady had
been so touched by his misfortunes that without knowing much of him, she
had shown great sympathy and interest in his case. Laube’s sentence was
pronounced soon after I left Berlin; it was unexpectedly light, consisting of
only one year’s imprisonment in the town gaol. He was allowed to undergo
this term in the prison at Muskau in Silesia, where he had the advantage of
being near his friend, Prince Puckler, who in his official capacity, and on
account of his influence with the governor of the prison, was permitted to
afford the prisoner even the consolation of personal intercourse.
The young widow resolved to marry him at the beginning of his term of
imprisonment, so that she might be near him at Muskau with her loving
assistance. To see my old friend under such favourable conditions was in
itself a pleasure to me; I also experienced the liveliest satisfaction at finding
there was no change in his former sympathetic attitude. We met frequently;
our wives also became friends, and Laube was the first to approve in his
kindly humorous way of our folly in moving to Paris.
In his house I made the acquaintance of Heinrich Heine, and both of
them joked good-humouredly over my extraordinary position, making even
me laugh. Laube felt himself compelled to talk seriously to me about my
expectations of succeeding in Paris, as he saw that I treated my situation,
based on such trivial hopes, with a humour that charmed him even against
his better judgment. He tried to think how he could help me without
prejudicing my future. With this object he wanted me to make a more or
less plausible sketch of my future plans, so that on his approaching visit to
our native land he might procure some help for me. I happened just at that
sister Cecilia also arrived in Paris with her husband, Edward Avenarius. It
was only natural that she should feel embarrassed at the idea of meeting us
in Paris in our extremely straitened circumstances, especially as her
husband was not very well off. Consequently, instead of calling on them
frequently, we preferred waiting until they came to see us, which, by the
way, took them a long time. On the other hand, the renewal of our
acquaintance with Heinrich Laube, who came over to Paris at the beginning
of 1840 with his young wife, Iduna (nee Budaus), was very cheering. She
was the widow of a wealthy Leipzig doctor, and Laube had married her
under very extraordinary circumstances, since we last saw him in Berlin;
they intended to enjoy themselves for a few months in Paris. During the
long period of his detention, while awaiting his trial, this young lady had
been so touched by his misfortunes that without knowing much of him, she
had shown great sympathy and interest in his case. Laube’s sentence was
pronounced soon after I left Berlin; it was unexpectedly light, consisting of
only one year’s imprisonment in the town gaol. He was allowed to undergo
this term in the prison at Muskau in Silesia, where he had the advantage of
being near his friend, Prince Puckler, who in his official capacity, and on
account of his influence with the governor of the prison, was permitted to
afford the prisoner even the consolation of personal intercourse.
The young widow resolved to marry him at the beginning of his term of
imprisonment, so that she might be near him at Muskau with her loving
assistance. To see my old friend under such favourable conditions was in
itself a pleasure to me; I also experienced the liveliest satisfaction at finding
there was no change in his former sympathetic attitude. We met frequently;
our wives also became friends, and Laube was the first to approve in his
kindly humorous way of our folly in moving to Paris.
In his house I made the acquaintance of Heinrich Heine, and both of
them joked good-humouredly over my extraordinary position, making even
me laugh. Laube felt himself compelled to talk seriously to me about my
expectations of succeeding in Paris, as he saw that I treated my situation,
based on such trivial hopes, with a humour that charmed him even against
his better judgment. He tried to think how he could help me without
prejudicing my future. With this object he wanted me to make a more or
less plausible sketch of my future plans, so that on his approaching visit to
our native land he might procure some help for me. I happened just at that
Page 207
time to have come to an exceedingly promising understanding with the
management of the Theatre de la Renaissance. I thus seemed to have
obtained a footing, and I thought it safe to assert, that if I were guaranteed
the means of livelihood for six months, I could not fail within that period to
accomplish something. Laube promised to make this provision, and kept his
word. He induced one of his wealthy friends in Leipzig, and, following this
example, my well-to-do relations, to provide me for six months with the
necessary resources, to be paid in monthly instalments through Avenarius.
We therefore decided, as I have said, to leave our furnished apartments
and take a flat for ourselves in the Rue du Helder. My prudent, careful wife
had suffered greatly on account of the careless and uncertain manner in
which I had hitherto controlled our meagre resources, and in now
undertaking the responsibility, she explained that she understood how to
keep house more cheaply than we could do by living in furnished rooms
and restaurants. Success justified the step; the serious part of the question
lay in the fact that we had to start housekeeping without any furniture of our
own, and everything necessary for domestic purposes had to be procured,
though we had not the wherewithal to get it. In this matter Lehrs, who was
well versed in the peculiarities of Parisian life, was able to advise us. In his
opinion the only compensation for the experiences we had undergone
hitherto would be a success equivalent to my daring. As I did not possess
the resources to allow of long years of patient waiting for success in Paris, I
must either count on extraordinary luck or renounce all my hopes forthwith.
The longed-for success must come within a year, or I should be ruined.
Therefore I must dare all, as befitted my name, for in my case he was not
inclined to derive ‘Wagner’[10] from Fuhrwerk. I was to pay my rent, twelve
hundred francs, in quarterly instalments; for the furniture and fittings, he
recommended me, through his landlady, to a carpenter who provided
everything that was necessary for what seemed to be a reasonable sum, also
to be paid by instalments, all of which appeared very simple. Lehrs
maintained that I should do no good in Paris unless I showed the world that
I had confidence in myself. My trial audience was impending; I felt sure of
the Theatre de la Renaissance, and Dumersan was keenly anxious to make a
complete translation of my Liebesverbot into French. So we decided to run
the risk. On 15th April, to the astonishment of the concierge of the house in
the Rue du Helder, we moved with an exceedingly small amount of luggage
into our comfortable new apartments.
management of the Theatre de la Renaissance. I thus seemed to have
obtained a footing, and I thought it safe to assert, that if I were guaranteed
the means of livelihood for six months, I could not fail within that period to
accomplish something. Laube promised to make this provision, and kept his
word. He induced one of his wealthy friends in Leipzig, and, following this
example, my well-to-do relations, to provide me for six months with the
necessary resources, to be paid in monthly instalments through Avenarius.
We therefore decided, as I have said, to leave our furnished apartments
and take a flat for ourselves in the Rue du Helder. My prudent, careful wife
had suffered greatly on account of the careless and uncertain manner in
which I had hitherto controlled our meagre resources, and in now
undertaking the responsibility, she explained that she understood how to
keep house more cheaply than we could do by living in furnished rooms
and restaurants. Success justified the step; the serious part of the question
lay in the fact that we had to start housekeeping without any furniture of our
own, and everything necessary for domestic purposes had to be procured,
though we had not the wherewithal to get it. In this matter Lehrs, who was
well versed in the peculiarities of Parisian life, was able to advise us. In his
opinion the only compensation for the experiences we had undergone
hitherto would be a success equivalent to my daring. As I did not possess
the resources to allow of long years of patient waiting for success in Paris, I
must either count on extraordinary luck or renounce all my hopes forthwith.
The longed-for success must come within a year, or I should be ruined.
Therefore I must dare all, as befitted my name, for in my case he was not
inclined to derive ‘Wagner’[10] from Fuhrwerk. I was to pay my rent, twelve
hundred francs, in quarterly instalments; for the furniture and fittings, he
recommended me, through his landlady, to a carpenter who provided
everything that was necessary for what seemed to be a reasonable sum, also
to be paid by instalments, all of which appeared very simple. Lehrs
maintained that I should do no good in Paris unless I showed the world that
I had confidence in myself. My trial audience was impending; I felt sure of
the Theatre de la Renaissance, and Dumersan was keenly anxious to make a
complete translation of my Liebesverbot into French. So we decided to run
the risk. On 15th April, to the astonishment of the concierge of the house in
the Rue du Helder, we moved with an exceedingly small amount of luggage
into our comfortable new apartments.
Page 208
[10] ‘Wagner’ in German means one who dares, also a Wagoner; and ‘Fuhrwerk’
means a carriage.—Editor.
The very first visit I received in the rooms I had taken with such high
hopes was from Anders, who came with the tidings that the Theatre de la
Renaissance had just gone bankrupt, and was closed. This news, which
came on me like a thunder-clap, seemed to portend more than an ordinary
stroke of bad luck; it revealed to me like a flash of lightning the absolute
emptiness of my prospects. My friends openly expressed the opinion that
Meyerbeer, in sending me from the Grand Opera to this theatre, probably
knew the whole of the circumstances. I did not pursue the line of thought to
which this supposition might lead, as I felt cause enough for bitterness
when I wondered what I should do with the rooms in which I was so nicely
installed.
As my singers had now practised the portions of Liebesverbot intended
for the trial audience, I was anxious at least to have them performed before
some persons of influence. M. Edouard Monnaie, who had been appointed
temporary director of the Grand Opera after Duponchel’s retirement, was
the less disposed to refuse as the singers who were to take part belonged to
the institution over which he presided; moreover, there was no obligation
attached to his presence at the audience. I also took the trouble to call on
Scribe to invite him to attend, and he accepted with the kindest alacrity. At
last my three pieces were performed before these two gentlemen in the
green room of the Grand Opera, and I played the piano accompaniment.
They pronounced the music charming, and Scribe expressed his willingness
to arrange the libretto for me as soon as the managers of the opera had
decided on accepting the piece; all that M. Monnaie had to reply to this
offer was that it was impossible for them to do so at present. I did not fail to
realise that these were only polite expressions; but at all events I thought it
very nice of them, and particularly condescending of Scribe to have got so
far as to think me deserving of a little politeness.
But in my heart of hearts I felt really ashamed of having gone back again
seriously to that superficial early work from which I had taken these three
pieces. Of course I had only done this because I thought I should win
success more rapidly in Paris by adapting myself to its frivolous taste. My
aversion from this kind of taste, which had been long growing, coincided
with my abandonment of all hopes of success in Paris. I was placed in an
exceedingly melancholy situation by the fact that my circumstances had so
means a carriage.—Editor.
The very first visit I received in the rooms I had taken with such high
hopes was from Anders, who came with the tidings that the Theatre de la
Renaissance had just gone bankrupt, and was closed. This news, which
came on me like a thunder-clap, seemed to portend more than an ordinary
stroke of bad luck; it revealed to me like a flash of lightning the absolute
emptiness of my prospects. My friends openly expressed the opinion that
Meyerbeer, in sending me from the Grand Opera to this theatre, probably
knew the whole of the circumstances. I did not pursue the line of thought to
which this supposition might lead, as I felt cause enough for bitterness
when I wondered what I should do with the rooms in which I was so nicely
installed.
As my singers had now practised the portions of Liebesverbot intended
for the trial audience, I was anxious at least to have them performed before
some persons of influence. M. Edouard Monnaie, who had been appointed
temporary director of the Grand Opera after Duponchel’s retirement, was
the less disposed to refuse as the singers who were to take part belonged to
the institution over which he presided; moreover, there was no obligation
attached to his presence at the audience. I also took the trouble to call on
Scribe to invite him to attend, and he accepted with the kindest alacrity. At
last my three pieces were performed before these two gentlemen in the
green room of the Grand Opera, and I played the piano accompaniment.
They pronounced the music charming, and Scribe expressed his willingness
to arrange the libretto for me as soon as the managers of the opera had
decided on accepting the piece; all that M. Monnaie had to reply to this
offer was that it was impossible for them to do so at present. I did not fail to
realise that these were only polite expressions; but at all events I thought it
very nice of them, and particularly condescending of Scribe to have got so
far as to think me deserving of a little politeness.
But in my heart of hearts I felt really ashamed of having gone back again
seriously to that superficial early work from which I had taken these three
pieces. Of course I had only done this because I thought I should win
success more rapidly in Paris by adapting myself to its frivolous taste. My
aversion from this kind of taste, which had been long growing, coincided
with my abandonment of all hopes of success in Paris. I was placed in an
exceedingly melancholy situation by the fact that my circumstances had so
Page 209
shaped themselves that I dared not express this important change in my
feelings to any one, especially to my poor wife. But if I continued to make
the best of a bad bargain, I had no longer any illusions as to the possibility
of success in Paris. Face to face with unheard-of misery, I shuddered at the
smiling aspect which Paris presented in the bright sunshine of May. It was
the beginning of the slack season for any sort of artistic enterprise in Paris,
and from every door at which I knocked with feigned hope I was turned
away with the wretchedly monotonous phrase, Monsieur est a la campagne.
On our long walks, when we felt ourselves absolute strangers in the midst
of the gay throng, I used to romance to my wife about the South American
Free States, far away from all this sinister life, where opera and music were
unknown, and the foundations of a sensible livelihood could easily be
secured by industry. I told Minna, who was quite in the dark as to my
meaning, of a book I had just read, Zschokke’s Die Gründung von
Maryland, in which I found a very seductive account of the sensation of
relief experienced by the European settlers after their former sufferings and
persecutions. She, being of a more practical turn of mind, used to point out
to me the necessity of procuring means for our continued existence in Paris,
for which she had thought out all sorts of economies.
I, for my part, was sketching out the plan of the poem of my Fliegender
Holländer, which I kept steadily before me as a possible means of making a
debut in Paris. I put together the material for a single act, influenced by the
consideration that I could in this way confine it to the simple dramatic
developments between the principal characters, without troubling about the
tiresome operatic accessories. From a practical point of view, I thought I
could rely on a better prospect for the acceptance of my proposed work if it
were cast in the form of a one-act opera, such as was frequently given as a
curtain raiser before a ballet at the Grand Opera. I wrote about it to
Meyerbeer in Berlin, asking for his help. I also resumed the composition of
Rienzi, to the completion of which I was now giving my constant attention.
In the meantime our position became more and more gloomy; I was soon
compelled to draw in advance on the subsidies obtained by Laube, but in so
doing I gradually alienated the sympathy of my brother-in-law Avenarius, to
whom our stay in Paris was incomprehensible.
One morning, when we had been anxiously consulting as to the
possibility of raising our first quarter’s rent, a carrier appeared with a parcel
feelings to any one, especially to my poor wife. But if I continued to make
the best of a bad bargain, I had no longer any illusions as to the possibility
of success in Paris. Face to face with unheard-of misery, I shuddered at the
smiling aspect which Paris presented in the bright sunshine of May. It was
the beginning of the slack season for any sort of artistic enterprise in Paris,
and from every door at which I knocked with feigned hope I was turned
away with the wretchedly monotonous phrase, Monsieur est a la campagne.
On our long walks, when we felt ourselves absolute strangers in the midst
of the gay throng, I used to romance to my wife about the South American
Free States, far away from all this sinister life, where opera and music were
unknown, and the foundations of a sensible livelihood could easily be
secured by industry. I told Minna, who was quite in the dark as to my
meaning, of a book I had just read, Zschokke’s Die Gründung von
Maryland, in which I found a very seductive account of the sensation of
relief experienced by the European settlers after their former sufferings and
persecutions. She, being of a more practical turn of mind, used to point out
to me the necessity of procuring means for our continued existence in Paris,
for which she had thought out all sorts of economies.
I, for my part, was sketching out the plan of the poem of my Fliegender
Holländer, which I kept steadily before me as a possible means of making a
debut in Paris. I put together the material for a single act, influenced by the
consideration that I could in this way confine it to the simple dramatic
developments between the principal characters, without troubling about the
tiresome operatic accessories. From a practical point of view, I thought I
could rely on a better prospect for the acceptance of my proposed work if it
were cast in the form of a one-act opera, such as was frequently given as a
curtain raiser before a ballet at the Grand Opera. I wrote about it to
Meyerbeer in Berlin, asking for his help. I also resumed the composition of
Rienzi, to the completion of which I was now giving my constant attention.
In the meantime our position became more and more gloomy; I was soon
compelled to draw in advance on the subsidies obtained by Laube, but in so
doing I gradually alienated the sympathy of my brother-in-law Avenarius, to
whom our stay in Paris was incomprehensible.
One morning, when we had been anxiously consulting as to the
possibility of raising our first quarter’s rent, a carrier appeared with a parcel
Page 210
addressed to me from London; I thought it was an intervention of
Providence, and broke open the seal. At the same moment a receipt-book
was thrust into my face for signature, in which I at once saw that I had to
pay seven francs for carriage. I recognised, moreover, that the parcel
contained my overture Rule Britannia, returned to me from the London
Philharmonic Society. In my fury I told the bearer that I would not take in
the parcel, whereupon he remonstrated in the liveliest fashion, as I had
already opened it. It was no use; I did not possess seven francs, and I told
him he should have presented the bill for the carriage before I had opened
the parcel. So I made him return the only copy of my overture to Messrs.
Laffitte and Gaillard’s firm, to do what they liked with it, and I never cared
to inquire what became of that manuscript.
Suddenly Kietz devised a way out of these troubles. He had been
commissioned by an old lady of Leipzig, called Fraulein Leplay, a rich and
very miserly old maid, to find a cheap lodging in Paris for her and for his
stepmother, with whom she intended to travel. As our apartment, though not
spacious, was larger than we actually needed, and had very quickly become
a troublesome burden to us, we did not hesitate for a moment to let the
larger portion of it to her for the time of her stay in Paris, which was to last
about two months. In addition, my wife provided the guests with breakfast,
as though they were in furnished apartments, and took a great pride in
looking at the few pence she earned in this way. Although we found this
amazing example of old-maidishness trying enough, the arrangement we
had made helped us in some degree to tide over the anxious time, and I was
able, in spite of this disorganisation of our household arrangements, to
continue working in comparative peace at my Rienzi.
This became more difficult after Fraulein Leplay’s departure, when we
let one of our rooms to a German commercial traveller, who in his leisure
hours zealously played the flute. His name was Brix; he was a modest,
decent fellow, and had been recommended to us by Pecht the painter, whose
acquaintance we had recently made. He had been introduced to us by Kietz,
who studied with him in Delaroche’s studio. He was the very antithesis of
Kietz in every way, and obviously endowed with less talent, yet he grappled
with the task of acquiring the art of oil-painting in the shortest possible time
under difficult circumstances with an industry and earnestness quite out of
the common. He was, moreover, well educated, and eagerly assimilated
information, and was very straightforward, earnest, and trustworthy.
Providence, and broke open the seal. At the same moment a receipt-book
was thrust into my face for signature, in which I at once saw that I had to
pay seven francs for carriage. I recognised, moreover, that the parcel
contained my overture Rule Britannia, returned to me from the London
Philharmonic Society. In my fury I told the bearer that I would not take in
the parcel, whereupon he remonstrated in the liveliest fashion, as I had
already opened it. It was no use; I did not possess seven francs, and I told
him he should have presented the bill for the carriage before I had opened
the parcel. So I made him return the only copy of my overture to Messrs.
Laffitte and Gaillard’s firm, to do what they liked with it, and I never cared
to inquire what became of that manuscript.
Suddenly Kietz devised a way out of these troubles. He had been
commissioned by an old lady of Leipzig, called Fraulein Leplay, a rich and
very miserly old maid, to find a cheap lodging in Paris for her and for his
stepmother, with whom she intended to travel. As our apartment, though not
spacious, was larger than we actually needed, and had very quickly become
a troublesome burden to us, we did not hesitate for a moment to let the
larger portion of it to her for the time of her stay in Paris, which was to last
about two months. In addition, my wife provided the guests with breakfast,
as though they were in furnished apartments, and took a great pride in
looking at the few pence she earned in this way. Although we found this
amazing example of old-maidishness trying enough, the arrangement we
had made helped us in some degree to tide over the anxious time, and I was
able, in spite of this disorganisation of our household arrangements, to
continue working in comparative peace at my Rienzi.
This became more difficult after Fraulein Leplay’s departure, when we
let one of our rooms to a German commercial traveller, who in his leisure
hours zealously played the flute. His name was Brix; he was a modest,
decent fellow, and had been recommended to us by Pecht the painter, whose
acquaintance we had recently made. He had been introduced to us by Kietz,
who studied with him in Delaroche’s studio. He was the very antithesis of
Kietz in every way, and obviously endowed with less talent, yet he grappled
with the task of acquiring the art of oil-painting in the shortest possible time
under difficult circumstances with an industry and earnestness quite out of
the common. He was, moreover, well educated, and eagerly assimilated
information, and was very straightforward, earnest, and trustworthy.
Page 211
Without attaining to the same degree of intimacy with us as our three older
friends, he was, nevertheless, one of the few who continued to stand by us
in our troubles, and habitually spent nearly every evening in our company.
One day I received a fresh surprising proof of Laube’s continued
solicitude on our behalf. The secretary of a certain Count Kuscelew called
on us, and after some inquiry into our affairs, the state of which he had
heard from Laube at Karlsbad, informed us in a brief and friendly way that
his patron wished to be of use to us, and with that object in view desired to
make my acquaintance. In fact, he proposed to engage a small light opera
company in Paris, which was to follow him to his Russian estates. He was
therefore looking for a musical director of sufficient experience to assist in
recruiting the members in Paris. I gladly went to the hotel where the count
was staying, and there found an elderly gentleman of frank and agreeable
bearing, who willingly listened to my little French compositions. Being a
shrewd reader of human nature, he saw at a glance that I was not the man
for him, and though he showed me the most polite attention, he went no
further into the opera scheme. But that very day he sent me, accompanied
by a friendly note, ten golden napoleons, in payment for my services. What
these services were I did not know. I thereupon wrote to him, and asked for
more precise details of his wishes, and begged him to commission a
composition, the fee for which I presumed he had sent in advance. As I
received no reply, I made more than one effort to approach him again, but in
vain. From other sources I afterwards learned that the only kind of opera
Count Kuscelew recognised was Adam’s. As for the operatic company to be
engaged to suit his taste, what he really wanted was more a small harem
than a company of artists.
So far I had not been able to arrange anything with the music publisher
Schlesinger. It was impossible to persuade him to publish my little French
songs. In order to do something, however, towards making myself known in
this direction, I decided to have my Two Grenadiers engraved by him at my
own expense. Kietz was to lithograph a magnificent title-page for it.
Schlesinger ended by charging me fifty francs for the cost of production.
The story of this publication is curious from beginning to end; the work
bore Schlesinger’s name, and as I had defrayed all expenses, the proceeds
were, of course, to be placed to my account. I had afterwards to take the
publisher’s word for it that not a single copy had been sold. Subsequently,
when I had made a quick reputation for myself in Dresden through my
friends, he was, nevertheless, one of the few who continued to stand by us
in our troubles, and habitually spent nearly every evening in our company.
One day I received a fresh surprising proof of Laube’s continued
solicitude on our behalf. The secretary of a certain Count Kuscelew called
on us, and after some inquiry into our affairs, the state of which he had
heard from Laube at Karlsbad, informed us in a brief and friendly way that
his patron wished to be of use to us, and with that object in view desired to
make my acquaintance. In fact, he proposed to engage a small light opera
company in Paris, which was to follow him to his Russian estates. He was
therefore looking for a musical director of sufficient experience to assist in
recruiting the members in Paris. I gladly went to the hotel where the count
was staying, and there found an elderly gentleman of frank and agreeable
bearing, who willingly listened to my little French compositions. Being a
shrewd reader of human nature, he saw at a glance that I was not the man
for him, and though he showed me the most polite attention, he went no
further into the opera scheme. But that very day he sent me, accompanied
by a friendly note, ten golden napoleons, in payment for my services. What
these services were I did not know. I thereupon wrote to him, and asked for
more precise details of his wishes, and begged him to commission a
composition, the fee for which I presumed he had sent in advance. As I
received no reply, I made more than one effort to approach him again, but in
vain. From other sources I afterwards learned that the only kind of opera
Count Kuscelew recognised was Adam’s. As for the operatic company to be
engaged to suit his taste, what he really wanted was more a small harem
than a company of artists.
So far I had not been able to arrange anything with the music publisher
Schlesinger. It was impossible to persuade him to publish my little French
songs. In order to do something, however, towards making myself known in
this direction, I decided to have my Two Grenadiers engraved by him at my
own expense. Kietz was to lithograph a magnificent title-page for it.
Schlesinger ended by charging me fifty francs for the cost of production.
The story of this publication is curious from beginning to end; the work
bore Schlesinger’s name, and as I had defrayed all expenses, the proceeds
were, of course, to be placed to my account. I had afterwards to take the
publisher’s word for it that not a single copy had been sold. Subsequently,
when I had made a quick reputation for myself in Dresden through my
Page 212
Rienzi, Schott the publisher in Mainz, who dealt almost exclusively in
works translated from the French, thought it advisable to bring out a
German edition of the Two Grenadiers. Below the text of the French
translation he had the German original by Heine printed; but as the French
poem was a very free paraphrase, in quite a different metre to the original,
Heine’s words fitted my composition so badly that I was furious at the
insult to my work, and thought it necessary to protest against Schott’s
publication as an entirely unauthorised reprint. Schott then threatened me
with an action for libel, as he said that, according to his agreement, his
edition was not a reprint (Nachdruck), but a reimpression (Abdruck). In
order to be spared further annoyance, I was induced to send him an apology
in deference to the distinction he had drawn, which I did not understand.
In 1848, when I made inquiries of Schlesinger’s successor in Paris (M.
Brandus) as to the fate of my little work, I learned from him that a new
edition had been published, but he declined to entertain any question of
rights on my part. Since I did not care to buy a copy with my own money, I
have to this day had to do without my own property. To what extent, in later
years, others profited by similar transactions relating to the publication of
my works, will appear in due course.
For the moment the point was to compensate Schlesinger for the fifty
francs agreed upon, and he proposed that I should do this by writing articles
for his Gazette Musicale.
As I was not expert enough in the French language for literary purposes,
my article had to be translated and half the fee had to go to the translator.
However, I consoled myself by thinking I should still receive sixty francs
per sheet for the work. I was soon to learn, when I presented myself to the
angry publisher for payment, what was meant by a sheet. It was measured
by an abominable iron instrument, on which the lines of the columns were
marked off with figures; this was applied to the article, and after careful
subtraction of the spaces left for the title and signature, the lines were added
up. After this process had been gone through, it appeared that what I had
taken for a sheet was only half a sheet.
So far so good. I began to write articles for Schlesinger’s wonderful
paper. The first was a long essay, De la musique allemande, in which I
expressed with the enthusiastic exaggeration characteristic of me at that
time my appreciation of the sincerity and earnestness of German music.
works translated from the French, thought it advisable to bring out a
German edition of the Two Grenadiers. Below the text of the French
translation he had the German original by Heine printed; but as the French
poem was a very free paraphrase, in quite a different metre to the original,
Heine’s words fitted my composition so badly that I was furious at the
insult to my work, and thought it necessary to protest against Schott’s
publication as an entirely unauthorised reprint. Schott then threatened me
with an action for libel, as he said that, according to his agreement, his
edition was not a reprint (Nachdruck), but a reimpression (Abdruck). In
order to be spared further annoyance, I was induced to send him an apology
in deference to the distinction he had drawn, which I did not understand.
In 1848, when I made inquiries of Schlesinger’s successor in Paris (M.
Brandus) as to the fate of my little work, I learned from him that a new
edition had been published, but he declined to entertain any question of
rights on my part. Since I did not care to buy a copy with my own money, I
have to this day had to do without my own property. To what extent, in later
years, others profited by similar transactions relating to the publication of
my works, will appear in due course.
For the moment the point was to compensate Schlesinger for the fifty
francs agreed upon, and he proposed that I should do this by writing articles
for his Gazette Musicale.
As I was not expert enough in the French language for literary purposes,
my article had to be translated and half the fee had to go to the translator.
However, I consoled myself by thinking I should still receive sixty francs
per sheet for the work. I was soon to learn, when I presented myself to the
angry publisher for payment, what was meant by a sheet. It was measured
by an abominable iron instrument, on which the lines of the columns were
marked off with figures; this was applied to the article, and after careful
subtraction of the spaces left for the title and signature, the lines were added
up. After this process had been gone through, it appeared that what I had
taken for a sheet was only half a sheet.
So far so good. I began to write articles for Schlesinger’s wonderful
paper. The first was a long essay, De la musique allemande, in which I
expressed with the enthusiastic exaggeration characteristic of me at that
time my appreciation of the sincerity and earnestness of German music.
Page 213
This article led my friend Anders to remark that the state of affairs in
Germany must, indeed, be splendid if the conditions were really as I
described. I enjoyed what was to me the surprising satisfaction of seeing
this article subsequently reproduced in Italian, in a Milan musical journal,
where, to my amusement, I saw myself described as Dottissimo Musico
Tedesco, a mistake which nowadays would be impossible. My essay
attracted favourable comment, and Schlesinger asked me to write an article
in praise of the arrangement made by the Russian General Lwoff of
Pergolesi’s Stabat Mater, which I did as superficially as possible. On my
own impulse I then wrote an essay in a still more amiable vein called Du
metier du virtuose et de l’independance de la composition.
In the meantime I was surprised in the middle of the summer by the
arrival of Meyerbeer, who happened to come to Paris for a fortnight. He
was very sympathetic and obliging. When I told him my idea of writing a
one-act opera as a curtain raiser, and asked him to give me an introduction
to M. Leon Pillet, the recently appointed manager of the Grand Opera, he at
once took me to see him, and presented me to him. But alas, I had the
unpleasant surprise of learning from the serious conversation which took
place between those two gentlemen as to my future, that Meyerbeer thought
I had better decide to compose an act for the ballet in collaboration with
another musician. Of course I could not entertain such an idea for a
moment. I succeeded, however, in handing over to M. Pillet my brief sketch
of the subject of the Flying Dutchman..
Things had reached this point when Meyerbeer again left Paris, this time
for a longer period of absence.
As I did not hear from M. Pillet for quite a long time, I now began to
work diligently at my composition of Rienzi, though, to my great distress, I
had often to interrupt this task in order to undertake certain pot-boiling
hack-work for Schlesinger.
As my contributions to the Gazette Musicale proved so unremunerative,
Schlesinger one day ordered me to work out a method for the Cornet a
pistons. When I told him about my embarrassment, in not knowing how to
deal with the subject, he replied by sending me five different published
‘Methods’ for the Cornet a pistons, at that time the favourite amateur
instrument among the younger male population of Paris. I had merely to
devise a new sixth method out of these five, as all Schlesinger wanted was
Germany must, indeed, be splendid if the conditions were really as I
described. I enjoyed what was to me the surprising satisfaction of seeing
this article subsequently reproduced in Italian, in a Milan musical journal,
where, to my amusement, I saw myself described as Dottissimo Musico
Tedesco, a mistake which nowadays would be impossible. My essay
attracted favourable comment, and Schlesinger asked me to write an article
in praise of the arrangement made by the Russian General Lwoff of
Pergolesi’s Stabat Mater, which I did as superficially as possible. On my
own impulse I then wrote an essay in a still more amiable vein called Du
metier du virtuose et de l’independance de la composition.
In the meantime I was surprised in the middle of the summer by the
arrival of Meyerbeer, who happened to come to Paris for a fortnight. He
was very sympathetic and obliging. When I told him my idea of writing a
one-act opera as a curtain raiser, and asked him to give me an introduction
to M. Leon Pillet, the recently appointed manager of the Grand Opera, he at
once took me to see him, and presented me to him. But alas, I had the
unpleasant surprise of learning from the serious conversation which took
place between those two gentlemen as to my future, that Meyerbeer thought
I had better decide to compose an act for the ballet in collaboration with
another musician. Of course I could not entertain such an idea for a
moment. I succeeded, however, in handing over to M. Pillet my brief sketch
of the subject of the Flying Dutchman..
Things had reached this point when Meyerbeer again left Paris, this time
for a longer period of absence.
As I did not hear from M. Pillet for quite a long time, I now began to
work diligently at my composition of Rienzi, though, to my great distress, I
had often to interrupt this task in order to undertake certain pot-boiling
hack-work for Schlesinger.
As my contributions to the Gazette Musicale proved so unremunerative,
Schlesinger one day ordered me to work out a method for the Cornet a
pistons. When I told him about my embarrassment, in not knowing how to
deal with the subject, he replied by sending me five different published
‘Methods’ for the Cornet a pistons, at that time the favourite amateur
instrument among the younger male population of Paris. I had merely to
devise a new sixth method out of these five, as all Schlesinger wanted was
Page 214
to publish an edition of his own. I was racking my brains how to start, when
Schlesinger, who had just obtained a new complete method, released me
from the onerous task. I was, however, told to write fourteen ‘Suites’ for the
Cornet a pistons—that is to say, airs out of operas arranged for this
instrument. To furnish me with material for this work, Schlesinger sent me
no less than sixty complete operas arranged for the piano. I looked them
through for suitable airs for my ‘Suites,’ marked the pages in the volumes
with paper strips, and arranged them into a curious-looking structure round
my work-table, so that I might have the greatest possible variety of the
melodious material within my reach. When I was in the midst of this work,
however, to my great relief and to my poor wife’s consternation,
Schlesinger told me that M. Schlitz, the first cornet player in Paris, who had
looked my ‘Etudes’ through, preparatory to their being engraved, had
declared that I knew absolutely nothing about the instrument, and had
generally adopted keys that were too high, which Parisians would never be
able to use. The part of the work I had already done was, however,
accepted, Schlitz having agreed to correct it, but on condition that I should
share my fee with him. The remainder of the work was then taken off my
hands, and the sixty pianoforte arrangements went back to the curious shop
in the Rue Richelieu.
So my exchequer was again in a sorry plight. The distressing poverty of
my home grew more apparent every day, and yet I was now free to give a
last touch to Rienzi, and by the 19th of November I had completed this
most voluminous of all my operas. I had decided, some time previously, to
offer the first production of this work to the Court Theatre at Dresden, so
that, in the event of its being a success, I might thus resume my connection
with Germany. I had decided upon Dresden as I knew that there I should
have in Tichatschek the most suitable tenor for the leading part. I also
reckoned on my acquaintance with Schroder-Devrient, who had always
been nice to me and who, though her efforts were ineffectual, had been at
great pains, out of regard for my family, to get my Feen introduced at the
Court Theatre, Dresden. In the secretary of the theatre, Hofrat Winkler
(known as Theodor Hell), I also had an old friend of my family, besides
which I had been introduced to the conductor, Reissiger, with whom I and
my friend Apel had spent a pleasant evening on the occasion of our
excursion to Bohemia in earlier days. To all these people I now addressed
most respectful and eloquent appeals, wrote out an official note to the
Schlesinger, who had just obtained a new complete method, released me
from the onerous task. I was, however, told to write fourteen ‘Suites’ for the
Cornet a pistons—that is to say, airs out of operas arranged for this
instrument. To furnish me with material for this work, Schlesinger sent me
no less than sixty complete operas arranged for the piano. I looked them
through for suitable airs for my ‘Suites,’ marked the pages in the volumes
with paper strips, and arranged them into a curious-looking structure round
my work-table, so that I might have the greatest possible variety of the
melodious material within my reach. When I was in the midst of this work,
however, to my great relief and to my poor wife’s consternation,
Schlesinger told me that M. Schlitz, the first cornet player in Paris, who had
looked my ‘Etudes’ through, preparatory to their being engraved, had
declared that I knew absolutely nothing about the instrument, and had
generally adopted keys that were too high, which Parisians would never be
able to use. The part of the work I had already done was, however,
accepted, Schlitz having agreed to correct it, but on condition that I should
share my fee with him. The remainder of the work was then taken off my
hands, and the sixty pianoforte arrangements went back to the curious shop
in the Rue Richelieu.
So my exchequer was again in a sorry plight. The distressing poverty of
my home grew more apparent every day, and yet I was now free to give a
last touch to Rienzi, and by the 19th of November I had completed this
most voluminous of all my operas. I had decided, some time previously, to
offer the first production of this work to the Court Theatre at Dresden, so
that, in the event of its being a success, I might thus resume my connection
with Germany. I had decided upon Dresden as I knew that there I should
have in Tichatschek the most suitable tenor for the leading part. I also
reckoned on my acquaintance with Schroder-Devrient, who had always
been nice to me and who, though her efforts were ineffectual, had been at
great pains, out of regard for my family, to get my Feen introduced at the
Court Theatre, Dresden. In the secretary of the theatre, Hofrat Winkler
(known as Theodor Hell), I also had an old friend of my family, besides
which I had been introduced to the conductor, Reissiger, with whom I and
my friend Apel had spent a pleasant evening on the occasion of our
excursion to Bohemia in earlier days. To all these people I now addressed
most respectful and eloquent appeals, wrote out an official note to the
Page 215
director, Herr von Lüttichau, as well as a formal petition to the King of
Saxony, and had everything ready to send off.
Meantime, I had not omitted to indicate the exact tempi in my opera by
means of a metronome. As I did not possess such a thing, I had to borrow
one, and one morning I went out to restore the instrument to its owner,
carrying it under my thin overcoat. The day when this occurred was one of
the strangest in my life, as it showed in a really horrible way the whole
misery of my position at that time. In addition to the fact that I did not know
where to look for the few francs wherewith Minna was to provide for our
scanty household requirements, some of the bills which, in accordance with
the custom in Paris in those days, I had signed for the purpose of fitting up
our apartments, had fallen due. Hoping to get help from one source or
another, I first tried to get those bills prolonged by the holders. As such
documents pass through many hands, I had to call on all the holders across
the length and breadth of the city. That day I was to propitiate a cheese-
monger who occupied a fifth-floor apartment in the Cite. I also intended to
ask for help from Heinrich, the brother of my brother-in-law, Brockhaus, as
he was then in Paris; and I was going to call at Schlesinger’s to raise the
money to pay for the despatch of my score that day by the usual mail
service.
As I had also to deliver the metronome, I left Minna early in the morning
after a sad good-bye. She knew from experience that as I was on a money-
raising expedition, she would not see me back till late at night. The streets
were enveloped in a dense fog, and the first thing I recognised on leaving
the house was my dog Robber, who had been stolen from us a year before.
At first I thought it was a ghost, but I called out to him sharply in a shrill
voice. The animal seemed to recognise me, and approached me cautiously,
but my sudden movement towards him with outstretched arms seemed only
to revive memories of the few chastisements I had foolishly inflicted on
him during the latter part of our association, and this memory prevailed
over all others. He drew timidly away from me and, as I followed him with
some eagerness, he ran, only to accelerate his speed when he found he was
being pursued. I became more and more convinced that he had recognised
me, because he always looked back anxiously when he reached a corner;
but seeing that I was hunting him like a maniac, he started off again each
time with renewed energy. Thus I followed him through a labyrinth of
streets, hardly distinguishable in the thick mist, until I eventually lost sight
Saxony, and had everything ready to send off.
Meantime, I had not omitted to indicate the exact tempi in my opera by
means of a metronome. As I did not possess such a thing, I had to borrow
one, and one morning I went out to restore the instrument to its owner,
carrying it under my thin overcoat. The day when this occurred was one of
the strangest in my life, as it showed in a really horrible way the whole
misery of my position at that time. In addition to the fact that I did not know
where to look for the few francs wherewith Minna was to provide for our
scanty household requirements, some of the bills which, in accordance with
the custom in Paris in those days, I had signed for the purpose of fitting up
our apartments, had fallen due. Hoping to get help from one source or
another, I first tried to get those bills prolonged by the holders. As such
documents pass through many hands, I had to call on all the holders across
the length and breadth of the city. That day I was to propitiate a cheese-
monger who occupied a fifth-floor apartment in the Cite. I also intended to
ask for help from Heinrich, the brother of my brother-in-law, Brockhaus, as
he was then in Paris; and I was going to call at Schlesinger’s to raise the
money to pay for the despatch of my score that day by the usual mail
service.
As I had also to deliver the metronome, I left Minna early in the morning
after a sad good-bye. She knew from experience that as I was on a money-
raising expedition, she would not see me back till late at night. The streets
were enveloped in a dense fog, and the first thing I recognised on leaving
the house was my dog Robber, who had been stolen from us a year before.
At first I thought it was a ghost, but I called out to him sharply in a shrill
voice. The animal seemed to recognise me, and approached me cautiously,
but my sudden movement towards him with outstretched arms seemed only
to revive memories of the few chastisements I had foolishly inflicted on
him during the latter part of our association, and this memory prevailed
over all others. He drew timidly away from me and, as I followed him with
some eagerness, he ran, only to accelerate his speed when he found he was
being pursued. I became more and more convinced that he had recognised
me, because he always looked back anxiously when he reached a corner;
but seeing that I was hunting him like a maniac, he started off again each
time with renewed energy. Thus I followed him through a labyrinth of
streets, hardly distinguishable in the thick mist, until I eventually lost sight
Page 216
of him altogether, never to see him again. It was near the church of St.
Roch, and I, wet with perspiration and quite breathless, was still bearing the
metronome. For a while I stood motionless, glaring into the mist, and
wondered what the ghostly reappearance of the companion of my travelling
adventures on this day might portend! The fact that he had fled from his old
master with the terror of a wild beast filled my heart with a strange
bitterness and seemed to me a horrible omen. Sadly shaken, I set out again,
with trembling limbs, upon my weary errand.
Heinrich Brockhaus told me he could not help me, and I left him. I was
sorely ashamed, but made a strong effort to conceal the painfulness of my
situation. My other undertakings turned out equally hopeless, and after
having been kept waiting for hours at Schlesinger’s, listening to my
employer’s very trivial conversations with his callers—conversations which
he seemed purposely to protract—I reappeared under the windows of my
home long after dark, utterly unsuccessful. I saw Minna looking anxiously
from one of the windows. Half expecting my misfortune she had, in the
meantime, succeeded in borrowing a small sum of our lodger and boarder,
Brix, the flute-player, whom we tolerated patiently, though at some
inconvenience to ourselves, as he was a good-natured fellow. So she was
able to offer me at least a comfortable meal. Further help was to come to me
subsequently, though at the cost of great sacrifices on my part, owing to the
success of one of Donizetti’s operas, La Favorita, a very poor work of the
Italian maestro’s, but welcomed with great enthusiasm by the Parisian
public, already so much degenerated. This opera, the success of which was
due mainly to two lively little songs, had been acquired by Schlesinger, who
had lost heavily over Halevy’s last operas.
Taking advantage of my helpless situation, of which he was well aware,
he rushed into our rooms one morning, beaming all over with amusing
good-humour, called for pen and ink, and began to work out a calculation of
the enormous fees which he had arranged for me! He put down: ‘La
Favorita, complete arrangement for pianoforte, arrangement without words,
for solo; ditto, for duet; complete arrangement for quartette; the same for
two violins; ditto for a Cornet a piston. Total fee, frcs. 1100. Immediate
advance in cash, frcs. 500.’ I could see at a glance what an enormous
amount of trouble this work would involve, but I did not hesitate a moment
to undertake it.
Roch, and I, wet with perspiration and quite breathless, was still bearing the
metronome. For a while I stood motionless, glaring into the mist, and
wondered what the ghostly reappearance of the companion of my travelling
adventures on this day might portend! The fact that he had fled from his old
master with the terror of a wild beast filled my heart with a strange
bitterness and seemed to me a horrible omen. Sadly shaken, I set out again,
with trembling limbs, upon my weary errand.
Heinrich Brockhaus told me he could not help me, and I left him. I was
sorely ashamed, but made a strong effort to conceal the painfulness of my
situation. My other undertakings turned out equally hopeless, and after
having been kept waiting for hours at Schlesinger’s, listening to my
employer’s very trivial conversations with his callers—conversations which
he seemed purposely to protract—I reappeared under the windows of my
home long after dark, utterly unsuccessful. I saw Minna looking anxiously
from one of the windows. Half expecting my misfortune she had, in the
meantime, succeeded in borrowing a small sum of our lodger and boarder,
Brix, the flute-player, whom we tolerated patiently, though at some
inconvenience to ourselves, as he was a good-natured fellow. So she was
able to offer me at least a comfortable meal. Further help was to come to me
subsequently, though at the cost of great sacrifices on my part, owing to the
success of one of Donizetti’s operas, La Favorita, a very poor work of the
Italian maestro’s, but welcomed with great enthusiasm by the Parisian
public, already so much degenerated. This opera, the success of which was
due mainly to two lively little songs, had been acquired by Schlesinger, who
had lost heavily over Halevy’s last operas.
Taking advantage of my helpless situation, of which he was well aware,
he rushed into our rooms one morning, beaming all over with amusing
good-humour, called for pen and ink, and began to work out a calculation of
the enormous fees which he had arranged for me! He put down: ‘La
Favorita, complete arrangement for pianoforte, arrangement without words,
for solo; ditto, for duet; complete arrangement for quartette; the same for
two violins; ditto for a Cornet a piston. Total fee, frcs. 1100. Immediate
advance in cash, frcs. 500.’ I could see at a glance what an enormous
amount of trouble this work would involve, but I did not hesitate a moment
to undertake it.
Page 217
Curiously enough, when I brought home these five hundred francs in
hard shining five-franc pieces, and piled them up on the table for our
edification, my sister Cecilia Avenarius happened to drop in to see us. The
sight of this abundance of wealth seemed to produce a good effect on her, as
she had hitherto been rather chary of coming to see us; and after that we
used to see rather more of her, and were often invited to dine with them on
Sundays. But I no longer cared for any amusements. I was so deeply
impressed by my past experiences that I made up my mind to work through
this humiliating, albeit profitable task, with untiring energy, as though it
were a penance imposed on me for the expiation of my bygone sins. To
save fuel, we limited ourselves to the use of the bedroom, making it serve
as a drawing-room, dining-room, and study, as well as dormitory. It was
only a step from my bed to my work-table; to be seated at the dining-table,
all I had to do was to turn my chair round, and I left my seat altogether only
late at night when I wanted to go to bed again. Every fourth day I allowed
myself a short constitutional. This penitential process lasted almost all
through the winter, and sowed the seeds of those gastric disorders which
were to be more or less of a trouble to me for the rest of my life.
In return for the minute and almost interminable work of correcting the
score of Donizetti’s opera, I managed to get three hundred francs from
Schlesinger, as he could not get any one else to do it. Besides this, I had to
find the time to copy out the orchestra parts of my overture to Faust, which
I was still hoping to hear at the Conservatoire; and by the way of
counteracting the depression produced by this humiliating occupation, I
wrote a short story, Eine Pilgerfahrt zu Beethoven (A Pilgrimage to
Beethoven), which appeared in the Gazette Musicale, under the title Une
Visite a Beethoven. Schlesinger told me candidly that this little work had
created quite a sensation, and had been received with very marked
approval; and, indeed, it was actually reproduced, either complete or in
parts, in a good many fireside journals.
He persuaded me to write some more of the same kind; and in a sequel
entitled Das Ende eines Musikers in Paris (Un Musicien etranger a Paris) I
avenged myself for all the misfortunes I had had to endure. Schlesinger was
not quite so pleased with this as with my first effort, but it received
touching signs of approval from his poor assistant; while Heinrich Heine
praised it by saying that ‘Hoffmann would have been incapable of writing
such a thing.’ Even Berlioz was touched by it, and spoke of the story very
hard shining five-franc pieces, and piled them up on the table for our
edification, my sister Cecilia Avenarius happened to drop in to see us. The
sight of this abundance of wealth seemed to produce a good effect on her, as
she had hitherto been rather chary of coming to see us; and after that we
used to see rather more of her, and were often invited to dine with them on
Sundays. But I no longer cared for any amusements. I was so deeply
impressed by my past experiences that I made up my mind to work through
this humiliating, albeit profitable task, with untiring energy, as though it
were a penance imposed on me for the expiation of my bygone sins. To
save fuel, we limited ourselves to the use of the bedroom, making it serve
as a drawing-room, dining-room, and study, as well as dormitory. It was
only a step from my bed to my work-table; to be seated at the dining-table,
all I had to do was to turn my chair round, and I left my seat altogether only
late at night when I wanted to go to bed again. Every fourth day I allowed
myself a short constitutional. This penitential process lasted almost all
through the winter, and sowed the seeds of those gastric disorders which
were to be more or less of a trouble to me for the rest of my life.
In return for the minute and almost interminable work of correcting the
score of Donizetti’s opera, I managed to get three hundred francs from
Schlesinger, as he could not get any one else to do it. Besides this, I had to
find the time to copy out the orchestra parts of my overture to Faust, which
I was still hoping to hear at the Conservatoire; and by the way of
counteracting the depression produced by this humiliating occupation, I
wrote a short story, Eine Pilgerfahrt zu Beethoven (A Pilgrimage to
Beethoven), which appeared in the Gazette Musicale, under the title Une
Visite a Beethoven. Schlesinger told me candidly that this little work had
created quite a sensation, and had been received with very marked
approval; and, indeed, it was actually reproduced, either complete or in
parts, in a good many fireside journals.
He persuaded me to write some more of the same kind; and in a sequel
entitled Das Ende eines Musikers in Paris (Un Musicien etranger a Paris) I
avenged myself for all the misfortunes I had had to endure. Schlesinger was
not quite so pleased with this as with my first effort, but it received
touching signs of approval from his poor assistant; while Heinrich Heine
praised it by saying that ‘Hoffmann would have been incapable of writing
such a thing.’ Even Berlioz was touched by it, and spoke of the story very
Page 218
favourably in one of his articles in the Journal des Debats. He also gave me
signs of his sympathy, though only during a conversation, after the
appearance of another of my musical articles entitled Ueber die Ouverture
(Concerning Overtures), mainly because I had illustrated my principle by
pointing to Gluck’s overture to Iphigenia in Aulis as a model for
compositions of this class.
Encouraged by these signs of sympathy, I felt anxious to become more
intimately acquainted with Berlioz. I had been introduced to him some time
previously at Schlesinger’s office, where we used to meet occasionally. I
had presented him with a copy of my Two Grenadiers, but could, however,
never learn any more from him concerning what he really thought of it than
the fact that as he could only strum a little on the guitar, he was unable to
play the music of my composition to himself on the piano. During the
previous winter I had often heard his grand instrumental pieces played
under his own direction, and had been most favourably impressed by them.
During that winter (1839-40) he conducted three performances of his new
symphony, Romeo and Juliet, at one of which I was present.
All this, to be sure, was quite a new world to me, and I was desirous of
gaining some unprejudiced knowledge of it. At first the grandeur and
masterly execution of the orchestral part almost overwhelmed me. It was
beyond anything I could have conceived. The fantastic daring, the sharp
precision with which the boldest combinations—almost tangible in their
clearness—impressed me, drove back my own ideas of the poetry of music
with brutal violence into the very depths of my soul. I was simply all ears
for things of which till then I had never dreamt, and which I felt I must try
to realise. True, I found a great deal that was empty and shallow in his
Romeo and Juliet, a work that lost much by its length and form of
combination; and this was the more painful to me seeing that, on the other
hand, I felt overpowered by many really bewitching passages which quite
overcame any objections on my part.
During the same winter Berlioz produced his Sinfonie Fantastique and
his Harald (‘Harold en Italie’). I was also much impressed by these works;
the musical genre-pictures woven into the first-named symphony were
particularly pleasing, while Harald delighted me in almost every respect..
It was, however, the latest work of this wonderful master, his Trauer-
Symphonie fur die Opfer der Juli-Revolution (Grande Symphonie Funebre
signs of his sympathy, though only during a conversation, after the
appearance of another of my musical articles entitled Ueber die Ouverture
(Concerning Overtures), mainly because I had illustrated my principle by
pointing to Gluck’s overture to Iphigenia in Aulis as a model for
compositions of this class.
Encouraged by these signs of sympathy, I felt anxious to become more
intimately acquainted with Berlioz. I had been introduced to him some time
previously at Schlesinger’s office, where we used to meet occasionally. I
had presented him with a copy of my Two Grenadiers, but could, however,
never learn any more from him concerning what he really thought of it than
the fact that as he could only strum a little on the guitar, he was unable to
play the music of my composition to himself on the piano. During the
previous winter I had often heard his grand instrumental pieces played
under his own direction, and had been most favourably impressed by them.
During that winter (1839-40) he conducted three performances of his new
symphony, Romeo and Juliet, at one of which I was present.
All this, to be sure, was quite a new world to me, and I was desirous of
gaining some unprejudiced knowledge of it. At first the grandeur and
masterly execution of the orchestral part almost overwhelmed me. It was
beyond anything I could have conceived. The fantastic daring, the sharp
precision with which the boldest combinations—almost tangible in their
clearness—impressed me, drove back my own ideas of the poetry of music
with brutal violence into the very depths of my soul. I was simply all ears
for things of which till then I had never dreamt, and which I felt I must try
to realise. True, I found a great deal that was empty and shallow in his
Romeo and Juliet, a work that lost much by its length and form of
combination; and this was the more painful to me seeing that, on the other
hand, I felt overpowered by many really bewitching passages which quite
overcame any objections on my part.
During the same winter Berlioz produced his Sinfonie Fantastique and
his Harald (‘Harold en Italie’). I was also much impressed by these works;
the musical genre-pictures woven into the first-named symphony were
particularly pleasing, while Harald delighted me in almost every respect..
It was, however, the latest work of this wonderful master, his Trauer-
Symphonie fur die Opfer der Juli-Revolution (Grande Symphonie Funebre
Page 219
et Triomphale), most skilfully composed for massed military bands during
the summer of 1840 for the anniversary of the obsequies of the July heroes,
and conducted by him under the column of the Place de la Bastille, which
had at last thoroughly convinced me of the greatness and enterprise of this
incomparable artist. But while admiring this genius, absolutely unique in
his methods, I could never quite shake off a certain peculiar feeling of
anxiety. His works left me with a sensation as of something strange,
something with which I felt I should never be able to be familiar, and I was
often puzzled at the strange fact that, though ravished by his compositions, I
was at the same time repelled and even wearied by them. It was only much
later that I succeeded in clearly grasping and solving this problem, which
for years exercised such a painful spell over me.
It is a fact that at that time I felt almost like a little school-boy by the side
of Berlioz. Consequently I was really embarrassed when Schlesinger,
determined to make good use of the success of my short story, told me he
was anxious to produce some of my orchestral compositions at a concert
arranged by the editor of the Gazette Musicale. I realised that none of my
available works would in any way be suitable for such an occasion. I was
not quite confident as to my Faust Overture because of its zephyr-like
ending, which I presumed could only be appreciated by an audience already
familiar with my methods. When, moreover, I learned that I should have
only a second-rate orchestra—the Valentino from the Casino, Rue St.
Honore—and, moreover, that there could be only one rehearsal, my only
alternative lay between declining altogether, or making another trial with
my Columbus Overture, the work composed in my early days at
Magdeburg. I adopted the latter course.
When I went to fetch the score of this composition from Ilabeneck, who
had it stored among the archives of the Conservatoire, he warned me
somewhat dryly, though not without kindness, of the danger of presenting
this work to the Parisian public, as, to use his own words, it was too
‘vague.’ One great objection was the difficulty of finding capable musicians
for the six cornets required, as the music for this instrument, so skilfully
played in Germany, could hardly, if ever, be satisfactorily executed in Paris.
Herr Schlitz, the corrector of my ‘Suites’ for Cornet a piston, offered his
assistance. I was compelled to reduce my six cornets to four, and he told me
that only two of these could be relied on.
the summer of 1840 for the anniversary of the obsequies of the July heroes,
and conducted by him under the column of the Place de la Bastille, which
had at last thoroughly convinced me of the greatness and enterprise of this
incomparable artist. But while admiring this genius, absolutely unique in
his methods, I could never quite shake off a certain peculiar feeling of
anxiety. His works left me with a sensation as of something strange,
something with which I felt I should never be able to be familiar, and I was
often puzzled at the strange fact that, though ravished by his compositions, I
was at the same time repelled and even wearied by them. It was only much
later that I succeeded in clearly grasping and solving this problem, which
for years exercised such a painful spell over me.
It is a fact that at that time I felt almost like a little school-boy by the side
of Berlioz. Consequently I was really embarrassed when Schlesinger,
determined to make good use of the success of my short story, told me he
was anxious to produce some of my orchestral compositions at a concert
arranged by the editor of the Gazette Musicale. I realised that none of my
available works would in any way be suitable for such an occasion. I was
not quite confident as to my Faust Overture because of its zephyr-like
ending, which I presumed could only be appreciated by an audience already
familiar with my methods. When, moreover, I learned that I should have
only a second-rate orchestra—the Valentino from the Casino, Rue St.
Honore—and, moreover, that there could be only one rehearsal, my only
alternative lay between declining altogether, or making another trial with
my Columbus Overture, the work composed in my early days at
Magdeburg. I adopted the latter course.
When I went to fetch the score of this composition from Ilabeneck, who
had it stored among the archives of the Conservatoire, he warned me
somewhat dryly, though not without kindness, of the danger of presenting
this work to the Parisian public, as, to use his own words, it was too
‘vague.’ One great objection was the difficulty of finding capable musicians
for the six cornets required, as the music for this instrument, so skilfully
played in Germany, could hardly, if ever, be satisfactorily executed in Paris.
Herr Schlitz, the corrector of my ‘Suites’ for Cornet a piston, offered his
assistance. I was compelled to reduce my six cornets to four, and he told me
that only two of these could be relied on.
Page 220
As a matter of fact, the attempts made at the rehearsal to produce those
very passages on which the effect of my work chiefly depended were very
discouraging. Not once were the soft high notes played but they were flat or
altogether wrong. In addition to this, as I was not going to be allowed to
conduct the work myself, I had to rely upon a conductor who, as I was well
aware, had fully convinced himself that my composition was the most utter
rubbish—an opinion that seemed to be shared by the whole orchestra.
Berlioz, who was present at the rehearsal, remained silent throughout. He
gave me no encouragement, though he did not dissuade me. He merely said
afterwards, with a weary smile, ‘that it was very difficult to get on in Paris.’
On the night of the performance (4th February 1841) the audience, which
was largely composed of subscribers to the Gazette Musicale, and to whom,
therefore, my literary successes were not unknown, seemed rather
favourably disposed towards me. I was told later on that my overture,
however wearisome it had been, would certainly have been applauded if
those unfortunate cornet players, by continually failing to produce the
effective passages, had not excited the public almost to the point of
hostility; for Parisians, for the most part, care only for the skilful parts of
performances, as, for instance, for the faultless production of difficult tones.
I was clearly conscious of my complete failure. After this misfortune Paris
no longer existed for me, and all I had to do was to go back to my miserable
bedroom and resume my work of arranging Donizetti’s operas.
So great was my renunciation of the world that, like a penitent, I no
longer shaved, and to my wife’s annoyance, for the first and only time in
my life allowed my beard to grow quite long. I tried to bear everything
patiently, and the only thing that threatened really to drive me to despair
was a pianist in the room adjoining ours who during the livelong day
practised Liszt’s fantasy on Lucia di Lammermoor. I had to put a stop to
this torture, so, to give him an idea of what he made us endure, one day I
moved our own piano, which was terribly out of tune, close up to the party
wall. Then Brix with his piccolo-flute played the piano-and-violin (or flute)
arrangement of the Favorita Overture I had just completed, while I
accompanied him on the piano. The effect on our neighbour, a young piano-
teacher, must have been appalling. The concierge told me the next day that
the poor fellow was leaving, and, after all, I felt rather sorry.
very passages on which the effect of my work chiefly depended were very
discouraging. Not once were the soft high notes played but they were flat or
altogether wrong. In addition to this, as I was not going to be allowed to
conduct the work myself, I had to rely upon a conductor who, as I was well
aware, had fully convinced himself that my composition was the most utter
rubbish—an opinion that seemed to be shared by the whole orchestra.
Berlioz, who was present at the rehearsal, remained silent throughout. He
gave me no encouragement, though he did not dissuade me. He merely said
afterwards, with a weary smile, ‘that it was very difficult to get on in Paris.’
On the night of the performance (4th February 1841) the audience, which
was largely composed of subscribers to the Gazette Musicale, and to whom,
therefore, my literary successes were not unknown, seemed rather
favourably disposed towards me. I was told later on that my overture,
however wearisome it had been, would certainly have been applauded if
those unfortunate cornet players, by continually failing to produce the
effective passages, had not excited the public almost to the point of
hostility; for Parisians, for the most part, care only for the skilful parts of
performances, as, for instance, for the faultless production of difficult tones.
I was clearly conscious of my complete failure. After this misfortune Paris
no longer existed for me, and all I had to do was to go back to my miserable
bedroom and resume my work of arranging Donizetti’s operas.
So great was my renunciation of the world that, like a penitent, I no
longer shaved, and to my wife’s annoyance, for the first and only time in
my life allowed my beard to grow quite long. I tried to bear everything
patiently, and the only thing that threatened really to drive me to despair
was a pianist in the room adjoining ours who during the livelong day
practised Liszt’s fantasy on Lucia di Lammermoor. I had to put a stop to
this torture, so, to give him an idea of what he made us endure, one day I
moved our own piano, which was terribly out of tune, close up to the party
wall. Then Brix with his piccolo-flute played the piano-and-violin (or flute)
arrangement of the Favorita Overture I had just completed, while I
accompanied him on the piano. The effect on our neighbour, a young piano-
teacher, must have been appalling. The concierge told me the next day that
the poor fellow was leaving, and, after all, I felt rather sorry.
Page 221
The wife of our concierge had entered into a sort of arrangement with us.
At first we had occasionally availed ourselves of her services, especially in
the kitchen, also for brushing clothes, cleaning boots, and so on; but even
the slight outlay that this involved was eventually too heavy for us, and
after having dispensed with her services, Minna had to suffer the
humiliation of doing the whole work of the household, even the most
menial part of it, herself. As we did not like to mention this to Brix, Minna
was obliged, not only to do all the cooking and washing up, but even to
clean our lodger’s boots as well. What we felt most, however, was the
thought of what the concierge and his wife would think of us; but we were
mistaken, for they only respected us the more, though of course we could
not avoid a little familiarity at times, Now and then, therefore, the man
would have a chat with me on politics. When the Quadruple Alliance
against France had been concluded, and the situation under Thiers’ ministry
was regarded as very critical, my concierge tried to reassure me one day by
saying: ‘Monsieur, il y a quatre hommes en Europe qui s’appellent: le roi
Louis Philippe, l’empereur d’Autriche, l’empereur de Russie, le roi de
Prusse; eh bien, ces quatre sont des c…; et nous n’aurons pas la guerre.’
Of an evening I very seldom lacked entertainment; but the few faithful
friends who came to see me had to put up with my going on scribbling
music till late in the night. Once they prepared a touching surprise for me in
the form of a little party which they arranged for New Year’s Eve (1840).
Lehrs arrived at dusk, rang the bell, and brought a leg of veal; Kietz brought
some rum, sugar, and a lemon; Pecht supplied a goose; and Anders two
bottles of the champagne with which he had been presented by a musical
instrument-maker in return for a flattering article he had written about his
pianos. Bottles from that stock were produced only on very great occasions.
I soon threw the confounded Favorita aside, therefore, and entered
enthusiastically into the fun.
We all had to assist in the preparations, to light the fire in the salon, give
a hand to my wife in the kitchen, and get what was wanted from the grocer.
The supper developed into a dithyrambic orgy. When the champagne was
drunk, and the punch began to produce its effects, I delivered a fiery speech
which so provoked the hilarity of the company that it seemed as though it
would never end. I became so excited that I first mounted a chair, and then,
by way of heightening the effect, at last stood on the table, thence to preach
the maddest gospel of the contempt of life together with a eulogy on the
At first we had occasionally availed ourselves of her services, especially in
the kitchen, also for brushing clothes, cleaning boots, and so on; but even
the slight outlay that this involved was eventually too heavy for us, and
after having dispensed with her services, Minna had to suffer the
humiliation of doing the whole work of the household, even the most
menial part of it, herself. As we did not like to mention this to Brix, Minna
was obliged, not only to do all the cooking and washing up, but even to
clean our lodger’s boots as well. What we felt most, however, was the
thought of what the concierge and his wife would think of us; but we were
mistaken, for they only respected us the more, though of course we could
not avoid a little familiarity at times, Now and then, therefore, the man
would have a chat with me on politics. When the Quadruple Alliance
against France had been concluded, and the situation under Thiers’ ministry
was regarded as very critical, my concierge tried to reassure me one day by
saying: ‘Monsieur, il y a quatre hommes en Europe qui s’appellent: le roi
Louis Philippe, l’empereur d’Autriche, l’empereur de Russie, le roi de
Prusse; eh bien, ces quatre sont des c…; et nous n’aurons pas la guerre.’
Of an evening I very seldom lacked entertainment; but the few faithful
friends who came to see me had to put up with my going on scribbling
music till late in the night. Once they prepared a touching surprise for me in
the form of a little party which they arranged for New Year’s Eve (1840).
Lehrs arrived at dusk, rang the bell, and brought a leg of veal; Kietz brought
some rum, sugar, and a lemon; Pecht supplied a goose; and Anders two
bottles of the champagne with which he had been presented by a musical
instrument-maker in return for a flattering article he had written about his
pianos. Bottles from that stock were produced only on very great occasions.
I soon threw the confounded Favorita aside, therefore, and entered
enthusiastically into the fun.
We all had to assist in the preparations, to light the fire in the salon, give
a hand to my wife in the kitchen, and get what was wanted from the grocer.
The supper developed into a dithyrambic orgy. When the champagne was
drunk, and the punch began to produce its effects, I delivered a fiery speech
which so provoked the hilarity of the company that it seemed as though it
would never end. I became so excited that I first mounted a chair, and then,
by way of heightening the effect, at last stood on the table, thence to preach
the maddest gospel of the contempt of life together with a eulogy on the
Page 222
South American Free States. My charmed listeners eventually broke into
such fits of sobs and laughter, and were so overcome, that we had to give
them all shelter for the night—their condition making it impossible for them
to reach their own homes in safety. On New Year’s Day (1841) I was again
busy with my Favorita.
I remember another similar though far less boisterous feast, on the
occasion of a visit paid us by the famous violinist Vieux-temps, an old
schoolfellow of Kietz’s. We had the great pleasure of hearing the young
virtuoso, who was then greatly feted in Paris, play to us charmingly for a
whole evening—a performance which lent my little salon an unusual touch
of ‘fashion.’ Kietz rewarded him for his kindness by carrying him on his
shoulders to his hotel close by.
We were hard hit in the early part of this year by a mistake I made owing
to my ignorance of Paris customs. It seemed to us quite a matter of course
that we should wait until the proper quarter-day to give notice to our
landlady. So I called on the proprietress of the house, a rich young widow
living in one of her own houses in the Marias quarter. She received me, but
seemed much embarrassed, and said she would speak to her agent about the
matter, and eventually referred me to him. The next day I was informed by
letter that my notice would have been valid had it been given two days
earlier. By this omission I had rendered myself liable, according to the
agreement, for another year’s rent. Horrified by this news, I went to see the
agent himself, and after having been kept waiting for a long time—as a
matter of fact they would not let me in at all—I found an elderly gentleman,
apparently crippled by some very painful malady, lying motionless before
me. I frankly told him my position, and begged him most earnestly to
release me from my agreement, but I was merely told that the fault was
mine, and not his, that I had given notice a day too late, and consequently
that I must find the rent for the next year. My concierge, to whom, with
some emotion, I related the story of this occurrence, tried to soothe me by
saying: ‘J’aurais pu vous dire cela, car voyez, monsieur, cet homme ne vaut
pas l’eau qu’il boit.’
This entirely unforeseen misfortune destroyed our last hopes of getting
out of our disastrous position. We consoled ourselves for awhile with the
hope of finding another lodger, but the fates were once more against us.
Easter came, the new term began, and our prospects were as hopeless as
such fits of sobs and laughter, and were so overcome, that we had to give
them all shelter for the night—their condition making it impossible for them
to reach their own homes in safety. On New Year’s Day (1841) I was again
busy with my Favorita.
I remember another similar though far less boisterous feast, on the
occasion of a visit paid us by the famous violinist Vieux-temps, an old
schoolfellow of Kietz’s. We had the great pleasure of hearing the young
virtuoso, who was then greatly feted in Paris, play to us charmingly for a
whole evening—a performance which lent my little salon an unusual touch
of ‘fashion.’ Kietz rewarded him for his kindness by carrying him on his
shoulders to his hotel close by.
We were hard hit in the early part of this year by a mistake I made owing
to my ignorance of Paris customs. It seemed to us quite a matter of course
that we should wait until the proper quarter-day to give notice to our
landlady. So I called on the proprietress of the house, a rich young widow
living in one of her own houses in the Marias quarter. She received me, but
seemed much embarrassed, and said she would speak to her agent about the
matter, and eventually referred me to him. The next day I was informed by
letter that my notice would have been valid had it been given two days
earlier. By this omission I had rendered myself liable, according to the
agreement, for another year’s rent. Horrified by this news, I went to see the
agent himself, and after having been kept waiting for a long time—as a
matter of fact they would not let me in at all—I found an elderly gentleman,
apparently crippled by some very painful malady, lying motionless before
me. I frankly told him my position, and begged him most earnestly to
release me from my agreement, but I was merely told that the fault was
mine, and not his, that I had given notice a day too late, and consequently
that I must find the rent for the next year. My concierge, to whom, with
some emotion, I related the story of this occurrence, tried to soothe me by
saying: ‘J’aurais pu vous dire cela, car voyez, monsieur, cet homme ne vaut
pas l’eau qu’il boit.’
This entirely unforeseen misfortune destroyed our last hopes of getting
out of our disastrous position. We consoled ourselves for awhile with the
hope of finding another lodger, but the fates were once more against us.
Easter came, the new term began, and our prospects were as hopeless as
Page 223
ever. At last our concierge recommended us to a family who were willing to
take the whole of our apartment, furniture included, off our hands for a few
months. We gladly accepted this offer; for, at any rate, it ensured the
payment of the rent for the ensuing quarter. We thought if only we could get
away from this unfortunate place we should find some way of getting rid of
it altogether. We therefore decided to find a cheap summer residence for
ourselves in the outskirts of Paris.
Meudon had been mentioned to us as an inexpensive summer resort, and
we selected an apartment in the avenue which joins Meudon to the
neighbouring village of Bellevue. We left full authority with our concierge
as to our rooms in Rue du Helder, and settled down in our new temporary
abode as well as we could. Old Brix, the good-natured flutist, had to stay
with us again, for, owing to the fact that his usual receipts had been delayed,
he would have been in great straits had we refused to give him shelter. The
removal of our scanty possessions took place on the 29th of April, and was,
after all, no more than a flight from the impossible into the unknown, for
how we were going to live during the following summer we had not the
faintest idea. Schlesinger had no work for me, and no other sources were
available.
The only help we could hope for seemed to lie in journalistic work
which, though rather unremunerative, had indeed given me the opportunity
of making a little success. During the previous winter I had written a long
article on Weber’s Freischutz for the Gazette Musicale. This was intended
to prepare the way for the forthcoming first performance of this opera, after
recitatives from the pen of Berlioz had been added to it. The latter was
apparently far from pleased at my article. In the article I could not help
referring to Berlioz’s absurd idea of polishing up this old-fashioned musical
work by adding ingredients that spoiled its original characteristics, merely
in order to give it an appearance suited to the luxurious repertoire of Opera
House. The fact that the result fully justified my forecasts did not in the
least tend to diminish the ill-feeling I had roused among all those concerned
in the production; but I had the satisfaction of hearing that the famous
George Sand had noticed my article. She commenced the introduction to a
legendary story of French provincial life by repudiating certain doubts as to
the ability of the French people to understand the mystic, fabulous element
which, as I had shown, was displayed in such a masterly manner in
take the whole of our apartment, furniture included, off our hands for a few
months. We gladly accepted this offer; for, at any rate, it ensured the
payment of the rent for the ensuing quarter. We thought if only we could get
away from this unfortunate place we should find some way of getting rid of
it altogether. We therefore decided to find a cheap summer residence for
ourselves in the outskirts of Paris.
Meudon had been mentioned to us as an inexpensive summer resort, and
we selected an apartment in the avenue which joins Meudon to the
neighbouring village of Bellevue. We left full authority with our concierge
as to our rooms in Rue du Helder, and settled down in our new temporary
abode as well as we could. Old Brix, the good-natured flutist, had to stay
with us again, for, owing to the fact that his usual receipts had been delayed,
he would have been in great straits had we refused to give him shelter. The
removal of our scanty possessions took place on the 29th of April, and was,
after all, no more than a flight from the impossible into the unknown, for
how we were going to live during the following summer we had not the
faintest idea. Schlesinger had no work for me, and no other sources were
available.
The only help we could hope for seemed to lie in journalistic work
which, though rather unremunerative, had indeed given me the opportunity
of making a little success. During the previous winter I had written a long
article on Weber’s Freischutz for the Gazette Musicale. This was intended
to prepare the way for the forthcoming first performance of this opera, after
recitatives from the pen of Berlioz had been added to it. The latter was
apparently far from pleased at my article. In the article I could not help
referring to Berlioz’s absurd idea of polishing up this old-fashioned musical
work by adding ingredients that spoiled its original characteristics, merely
in order to give it an appearance suited to the luxurious repertoire of Opera
House. The fact that the result fully justified my forecasts did not in the
least tend to diminish the ill-feeling I had roused among all those concerned
in the production; but I had the satisfaction of hearing that the famous
George Sand had noticed my article. She commenced the introduction to a
legendary story of French provincial life by repudiating certain doubts as to
the ability of the French people to understand the mystic, fabulous element
which, as I had shown, was displayed in such a masterly manner in
Page 224
Freischutz, and she pointed to my article as clearly explaining the
characteristics of that opera.
Another journalistic opportunity arose out of my endeavours to secure
the acceptance of my Rienzi by the Court Theatre at Dresden. Herr Winkler,
the secretary of that theatre, whom I have already mentioned, regularly
reported progress; but as editor of the Abendzeitung, a paper then rather on
the wane, he seized the opportunity presented by our negotiations in order
to ask me to send him frequent and gratuitous contributions. The
consequence was, that whenever I wanted to know anything concerning the
fate of my opera, I had to oblige him by enclosing an article for his paper.
Now, as these negotiations with the Court Theatre lasted a very long time,
and involved a large number of contributions from me, I often got into the
most extraordinary fixes simply owing to the fact that I was now once more
a prisoner in my room, and had been so for some time, and therefore knew
nothing of what was going on in Paris.
I had serious reasons for thus withdrawing from the artistic and social life
of Paris. My own painful experiences and my disgust at all the mockery of
that kind of life, once so attractive to me and yet so alien to my education,
had quickly driven me away from everything connected with it. It is true
that the production of the Huguenots, for instance, which I then heard for
the first time, dazzled me very much indeed. Its beautiful orchestral
execution, and the extremely careful and effective mise en scene, gave me a
grand idea of the great possibilities of such perfect and definite artistic
means. But, strange to say, I never felt inclined to hear the same opera
again. I soon became tired of the extravagant execution of the vocalists, and
I often amused my friends exceedingly by imitating the latest Parisian
methods and the vulgar exaggerations with which the performances teemed.
Those composers, moreover, who aimed at achieving success by adopting
the style which was then in vogue, could not help, either, incurring my
sarcastic criticism. The last shred of esteem which I still tried to retain for
the ‘first lyrical theatre in the world’ was at last rudely destroyed when I
saw how such an empty, altogether un-French work as Donizetti’s Favorita
could secure so long and important a run at this theatre.
During the whole time of my stay in Paris I do not think I went to the
opera more than four times. The cold productions at the Opera Comique,
and the degenerate quality of the music produced there, had repelled me
characteristics of that opera.
Another journalistic opportunity arose out of my endeavours to secure
the acceptance of my Rienzi by the Court Theatre at Dresden. Herr Winkler,
the secretary of that theatre, whom I have already mentioned, regularly
reported progress; but as editor of the Abendzeitung, a paper then rather on
the wane, he seized the opportunity presented by our negotiations in order
to ask me to send him frequent and gratuitous contributions. The
consequence was, that whenever I wanted to know anything concerning the
fate of my opera, I had to oblige him by enclosing an article for his paper.
Now, as these negotiations with the Court Theatre lasted a very long time,
and involved a large number of contributions from me, I often got into the
most extraordinary fixes simply owing to the fact that I was now once more
a prisoner in my room, and had been so for some time, and therefore knew
nothing of what was going on in Paris.
I had serious reasons for thus withdrawing from the artistic and social life
of Paris. My own painful experiences and my disgust at all the mockery of
that kind of life, once so attractive to me and yet so alien to my education,
had quickly driven me away from everything connected with it. It is true
that the production of the Huguenots, for instance, which I then heard for
the first time, dazzled me very much indeed. Its beautiful orchestral
execution, and the extremely careful and effective mise en scene, gave me a
grand idea of the great possibilities of such perfect and definite artistic
means. But, strange to say, I never felt inclined to hear the same opera
again. I soon became tired of the extravagant execution of the vocalists, and
I often amused my friends exceedingly by imitating the latest Parisian
methods and the vulgar exaggerations with which the performances teemed.
Those composers, moreover, who aimed at achieving success by adopting
the style which was then in vogue, could not help, either, incurring my
sarcastic criticism. The last shred of esteem which I still tried to retain for
the ‘first lyrical theatre in the world’ was at last rudely destroyed when I
saw how such an empty, altogether un-French work as Donizetti’s Favorita
could secure so long and important a run at this theatre.
During the whole time of my stay in Paris I do not think I went to the
opera more than four times. The cold productions at the Opera Comique,
and the degenerate quality of the music produced there, had repelled me
Page 225
from the start; and the same lack of enthusiasm displayed by the singers
also drove me from Italian opera. The names, often very famous ones, of
these artists who sang the same four operas for years could not compensate
me for the complete absence of sentiment which characterised their
performance, so unlike that of Schroder-Devrient, which I so thoroughly
enjoyed. I clearly saw that everything was on the down grade, and yet I
cherished no hope or desire to see this state of decline superseded by a
period of newer and fresher life. I preferred the small theatres, where
French talent was shown in its true light; and yet, as the result of my own
longings, I was too intent upon finding points of relationship in them which
would excite my sympathy, for it to be possible for me to realise those
peculiar excellences in them which did not happen to interest me at all.
Besides, from the very beginning my own troubles had proved so trying,
and the consciousness of the failure of my Paris schemes had become so
cruelly apparent, that, either out of indifference or annoyance, I declined all
invitations to the theatres. Again and again, much to Minna’s regret, I
returned tickets for performances in which Rachel was to appear at the
Theatre Francais, and, in fact, saw that famous theatre only once, when,
some time later, I had to go there on business for my Dresden patron, who
wanted some more articles.
I adopted the most shameful means for filling the columns of the
Abendzeitung; I just strung together whatever I happened to hear in the
evening from Anders and Lehrs. But as they had no very exciting
adventures either, they simply told me all they had picked up from papers
and table-talk, and this I tried to render with as much piquancy as possible
in accordance with the journalistic style created by Heine, which was all the
rage at the time. My one fear was lest old Hofrath Winkler should some day
discover the secret of my wide knowledge of Paris. Among other things
which I sent to his declining paper was a long account of the production of
Freischutz, He was particularly interested in it, as he was the guardian of
Weber’s children; and when in one of his letters he assured me that he
would not rest until he had got the definite assurance that Rienzi had been
accepted, I sent him, with my most profuse thanks, the German manuscript
of my ‘Beethoven’ story for his paper. The 1841 edition of this gazette, then
published by Arnold, but now no longer in existence, contains the only print
of this manuscript.
also drove me from Italian opera. The names, often very famous ones, of
these artists who sang the same four operas for years could not compensate
me for the complete absence of sentiment which characterised their
performance, so unlike that of Schroder-Devrient, which I so thoroughly
enjoyed. I clearly saw that everything was on the down grade, and yet I
cherished no hope or desire to see this state of decline superseded by a
period of newer and fresher life. I preferred the small theatres, where
French talent was shown in its true light; and yet, as the result of my own
longings, I was too intent upon finding points of relationship in them which
would excite my sympathy, for it to be possible for me to realise those
peculiar excellences in them which did not happen to interest me at all.
Besides, from the very beginning my own troubles had proved so trying,
and the consciousness of the failure of my Paris schemes had become so
cruelly apparent, that, either out of indifference or annoyance, I declined all
invitations to the theatres. Again and again, much to Minna’s regret, I
returned tickets for performances in which Rachel was to appear at the
Theatre Francais, and, in fact, saw that famous theatre only once, when,
some time later, I had to go there on business for my Dresden patron, who
wanted some more articles.
I adopted the most shameful means for filling the columns of the
Abendzeitung; I just strung together whatever I happened to hear in the
evening from Anders and Lehrs. But as they had no very exciting
adventures either, they simply told me all they had picked up from papers
and table-talk, and this I tried to render with as much piquancy as possible
in accordance with the journalistic style created by Heine, which was all the
rage at the time. My one fear was lest old Hofrath Winkler should some day
discover the secret of my wide knowledge of Paris. Among other things
which I sent to his declining paper was a long account of the production of
Freischutz, He was particularly interested in it, as he was the guardian of
Weber’s children; and when in one of his letters he assured me that he
would not rest until he had got the definite assurance that Rienzi had been
accepted, I sent him, with my most profuse thanks, the German manuscript
of my ‘Beethoven’ story for his paper. The 1841 edition of this gazette, then
published by Arnold, but now no longer in existence, contains the only print
of this manuscript.
Page 226
My occasional journalistic work was increased by a request from Lewald,
the editor of Europa, a literary monthly, asking me to write something for
him. This man was the first who, from time to time, had mentioned my
name to the public. As he used to publish musical supplements to his
elegant and rather widely read magazine, I sent him two of my
compositions from Königsberg for publication. One of these was the music
I had set to a melancholy poem by Scheuerlin, entitled Der Knabe und der
Tannenbaum (a work of which even to-day I am still proud), and my
beautiful Carnevals Lied out of Liebesverbot.
When I wanted to publish my little French compositions—Dors, mon
enfant, and the music to Hugo’s Attente and Ronsard’s Mignonne—Lewald
not only sent me a small fee—the first I had ever received for a composition
—but commissioned some long articles on my Paris impressions, which he
begged me to write as entertainingly as possible. For his paper I wrote
Pariser Amusements and Pariser Fatalitaten, in which I gave vent in a
humorous style, a la Heine, to all my disappointing experiences in Paris,
and to all my contempt for the life led by its inhabitants. In the second I
described the existence of a certain Hermann Pfau, a strange good-for-
nothing with whom, during my early Leipzig days, I had become more
intimately acquainted than was desirable. This man had been wandering
about Paris like a vagrant ever since the beginning of the previous winter,
and the meagre income I derived from arrangements of La Favorita was
often partly consumed in helping this completely broken-down fellow. So it
was only fair that I should get back a few francs of the money spent on him
in Paris by turning his adventures to some account in Lewald’s newspapers.
When I came into contact with Leon Pillet, the manager of the Opera, my
literary work took yet another direction. After numerous inquiries I
eventually discovered that he had taken a fancy to my draft of the
Fliegender Holländer. He informed me of this, and asked me to sell him the
plot, as he was under contract to supply various composers with subjects for
operettas. I tried to explain to Pillet, both verbally and in writing, that he
could hardly expect that the plot would be properly treated except by
myself, as this draft was in fact my own idea, and that it had only come to
his knowledge by my having submitted it to him. But it was all to no
purpose. He was obliged to admit quite frankly that the expectations I had
cherished as to the result of Meyerbeer’s recommendation to him would not
come to anything. He said there was no likelihood of my getting a
the editor of Europa, a literary monthly, asking me to write something for
him. This man was the first who, from time to time, had mentioned my
name to the public. As he used to publish musical supplements to his
elegant and rather widely read magazine, I sent him two of my
compositions from Königsberg for publication. One of these was the music
I had set to a melancholy poem by Scheuerlin, entitled Der Knabe und der
Tannenbaum (a work of which even to-day I am still proud), and my
beautiful Carnevals Lied out of Liebesverbot.
When I wanted to publish my little French compositions—Dors, mon
enfant, and the music to Hugo’s Attente and Ronsard’s Mignonne—Lewald
not only sent me a small fee—the first I had ever received for a composition
—but commissioned some long articles on my Paris impressions, which he
begged me to write as entertainingly as possible. For his paper I wrote
Pariser Amusements and Pariser Fatalitaten, in which I gave vent in a
humorous style, a la Heine, to all my disappointing experiences in Paris,
and to all my contempt for the life led by its inhabitants. In the second I
described the existence of a certain Hermann Pfau, a strange good-for-
nothing with whom, during my early Leipzig days, I had become more
intimately acquainted than was desirable. This man had been wandering
about Paris like a vagrant ever since the beginning of the previous winter,
and the meagre income I derived from arrangements of La Favorita was
often partly consumed in helping this completely broken-down fellow. So it
was only fair that I should get back a few francs of the money spent on him
in Paris by turning his adventures to some account in Lewald’s newspapers.
When I came into contact with Leon Pillet, the manager of the Opera, my
literary work took yet another direction. After numerous inquiries I
eventually discovered that he had taken a fancy to my draft of the
Fliegender Holländer. He informed me of this, and asked me to sell him the
plot, as he was under contract to supply various composers with subjects for
operettas. I tried to explain to Pillet, both verbally and in writing, that he
could hardly expect that the plot would be properly treated except by
myself, as this draft was in fact my own idea, and that it had only come to
his knowledge by my having submitted it to him. But it was all to no
purpose. He was obliged to admit quite frankly that the expectations I had
cherished as to the result of Meyerbeer’s recommendation to him would not
come to anything. He said there was no likelihood of my getting a
Page 227
commission for a composition, even of a light opera, for the next seven
years, as his already existing contracts extended over that period. He asked
me to be sensible, and to sell him the draft for a small amount, so that he
might have the music written by an author to be selected by him; and he
added that if I still wished to try my luck at the Opera House, I had better
see the ‘ballet-master,’ as he might want some music for a certain dance.
Seeing that I contemptuously refused this proposal, he left me to my own
devices.
After endless and unsuccessful attempts at getting the matter settled, I at
last begged Edouard Monnaie, the Commissaire for the Royal Theatres,
who was not only a friend of mine, but also editor of the Gazette Musicale,
to act as mediator. He candidly confessed that he could not understand
Pillet’s liking for my plot, which he also was acquainted with; but as Pillet
seemed to like it—though he would probably lose it—he advised me to
accept anything for it, as Monsieur Paul Faucher, a brother-in-law of Victor
Hugo’s, had had an offer to work out the scheme for a similar libretto. This
gentleman had, moreover, declared that there was nothing new in my plot,
as the story of the Vaisseau Fantome was well known in France. I now saw
how I stood, and, in a conversation with Pillet, at which M. Faucher was
present, I said I would come to an arrangement. My plot was generously
estimated by Pillet at five hundred francs, and I received that amount from
the cash office at the theatre, to be subsequently deducted from the author’s
rights of the future poet.
Our summer residence in the Avenue de Meudon now assumed quite a
definite character. These five hundred francs had to help me to work out the
words and music of my Fliegender Holländer for Germany, while I
abandoned the French Vaisseau Fantome to its fate.
The state of my affairs, which was getting ever worse and worse, was
slightly improved by the settlement of this matter. May and June had gone
by, and during these months our troubles had grown steadily more serious.
The lovely season of the year, the stimulating country air, and the sensation
of freedom following upon my deliverance from the wretchedly paid
musical hack-work I had had to do all the winter, wrought their beneficial
effects on me, and I was inspired to write a small story entitled Ein
glucklicher Abend. This was translated and published in French in the
Gazette Musicale. Soon, however, our lack of funds began to make itself
years, as his already existing contracts extended over that period. He asked
me to be sensible, and to sell him the draft for a small amount, so that he
might have the music written by an author to be selected by him; and he
added that if I still wished to try my luck at the Opera House, I had better
see the ‘ballet-master,’ as he might want some music for a certain dance.
Seeing that I contemptuously refused this proposal, he left me to my own
devices.
After endless and unsuccessful attempts at getting the matter settled, I at
last begged Edouard Monnaie, the Commissaire for the Royal Theatres,
who was not only a friend of mine, but also editor of the Gazette Musicale,
to act as mediator. He candidly confessed that he could not understand
Pillet’s liking for my plot, which he also was acquainted with; but as Pillet
seemed to like it—though he would probably lose it—he advised me to
accept anything for it, as Monsieur Paul Faucher, a brother-in-law of Victor
Hugo’s, had had an offer to work out the scheme for a similar libretto. This
gentleman had, moreover, declared that there was nothing new in my plot,
as the story of the Vaisseau Fantome was well known in France. I now saw
how I stood, and, in a conversation with Pillet, at which M. Faucher was
present, I said I would come to an arrangement. My plot was generously
estimated by Pillet at five hundred francs, and I received that amount from
the cash office at the theatre, to be subsequently deducted from the author’s
rights of the future poet.
Our summer residence in the Avenue de Meudon now assumed quite a
definite character. These five hundred francs had to help me to work out the
words and music of my Fliegender Holländer for Germany, while I
abandoned the French Vaisseau Fantome to its fate.
The state of my affairs, which was getting ever worse and worse, was
slightly improved by the settlement of this matter. May and June had gone
by, and during these months our troubles had grown steadily more serious.
The lovely season of the year, the stimulating country air, and the sensation
of freedom following upon my deliverance from the wretchedly paid
musical hack-work I had had to do all the winter, wrought their beneficial
effects on me, and I was inspired to write a small story entitled Ein
glucklicher Abend. This was translated and published in French in the
Gazette Musicale. Soon, however, our lack of funds began to make itself
Page 228
felt with a severity that was very discouraging. We felt this all the more
keenly when my sister Cecilia and her husband, following our example,
moved to a place quite close to us. Though not wealthy, they were fairly
well-to-do. They came to see us every day, but we never thought it desirable
to let them know how terribly hard-up we were. One day it came to a
climax. Being absolutely without money, I started out, early one morning,
to walk to Paris—for I had not even enough to pay the railway fare thither
—and I resolved to wander about the whole day, trudging from street to
street, even until late in the afternoon, in the hope of raising a five-franc
piece; but my errand proved absolutely vain, and I had to walk all the way
back to Meudon again, utterly penniless.
When I told Minna, who came to meet me, of my failure, she informed
me in despair that Hermann Pfau, whom I have mentioned before, had also
come to us in the most pitiful plight, and actually in want of food, and that
she had had to give him the last of the bread delivered by the baker that
morning. The only hope that now remained was that, at any rate, my lodger
Brix, who by a singular fate was now our companion in misfortune, would
return with some success from the expedition to Paris which he also had
made that morning. At last he, too, returned bathed in perspiration and
exhausted, driven home by the craving for a meal, which he had been
unable to procure in the town, as he could not find any of the acquaintances
he went to see. He begged most piteously for a piece of bread. This climax
to the situation at last inspired my wife with heroic resolution; for she felt it
her duty to exert herself to appease at least the hunger of her menfolk. For
the first time during her stay on French soil, she persuaded the baker, the
butcher, and wine-merchant, by plausible arguments, to supply her with the
necessaries of life without immediate cash payment, and Minna’s eyes
beamed when, an hour later, she was able to put before us an excellent
meal, during which, as it happened, we were surprised by the Avenarius
family, who were evidently relieved at finding us so well provided for.
This extreme distress was relieved for a time, at the beginning of July, by
the sale of my Vaisseau Fantome, which meant my final renunciation of my
success in Paris. As long as the five hundred francs lasted, I had an interval
of respite for carrying on my work. The first object on which I spent my
money was on the hire of a piano, a thing of which I had been entirely
deprived for months. My chief intention in so doing was to revive my faith
in myself as a musician, as, ever since the autumn of the previous year, I
keenly when my sister Cecilia and her husband, following our example,
moved to a place quite close to us. Though not wealthy, they were fairly
well-to-do. They came to see us every day, but we never thought it desirable
to let them know how terribly hard-up we were. One day it came to a
climax. Being absolutely without money, I started out, early one morning,
to walk to Paris—for I had not even enough to pay the railway fare thither
—and I resolved to wander about the whole day, trudging from street to
street, even until late in the afternoon, in the hope of raising a five-franc
piece; but my errand proved absolutely vain, and I had to walk all the way
back to Meudon again, utterly penniless.
When I told Minna, who came to meet me, of my failure, she informed
me in despair that Hermann Pfau, whom I have mentioned before, had also
come to us in the most pitiful plight, and actually in want of food, and that
she had had to give him the last of the bread delivered by the baker that
morning. The only hope that now remained was that, at any rate, my lodger
Brix, who by a singular fate was now our companion in misfortune, would
return with some success from the expedition to Paris which he also had
made that morning. At last he, too, returned bathed in perspiration and
exhausted, driven home by the craving for a meal, which he had been
unable to procure in the town, as he could not find any of the acquaintances
he went to see. He begged most piteously for a piece of bread. This climax
to the situation at last inspired my wife with heroic resolution; for she felt it
her duty to exert herself to appease at least the hunger of her menfolk. For
the first time during her stay on French soil, she persuaded the baker, the
butcher, and wine-merchant, by plausible arguments, to supply her with the
necessaries of life without immediate cash payment, and Minna’s eyes
beamed when, an hour later, she was able to put before us an excellent
meal, during which, as it happened, we were surprised by the Avenarius
family, who were evidently relieved at finding us so well provided for.
This extreme distress was relieved for a time, at the beginning of July, by
the sale of my Vaisseau Fantome, which meant my final renunciation of my
success in Paris. As long as the five hundred francs lasted, I had an interval
of respite for carrying on my work. The first object on which I spent my
money was on the hire of a piano, a thing of which I had been entirely
deprived for months. My chief intention in so doing was to revive my faith
in myself as a musician, as, ever since the autumn of the previous year, I
Page 229
had exercised my talents as a journalist and adapter of operas only. The
libretto of the Fliegender Holländer, which I had hurriedly written during
the recent period of distress, aroused considerable interest in Lehrs; he
actually declared I would never write anything better, and that the
Fliegender Holländer would be my Don Juan; the only thing now was to
find the music for it. As towards the end of the previous winter I still
entertained the hopes of being permitted to treat this subject for the French
Opera, I had already finished some of the words and music of the lyric
parts, and had had the libretto translated by Emile Deschamps, intending it
for a trial performance, which, alas, never took place. These parts were the
ballad of Senta, the song of the Norwegian sailors, and the ‘Spectre Song’
of the crew of the Fliegender Holländer. Since that time I had been so
violently torn away from the music that, when the piano arrived at my rustic
retreat, I did not dare to touch it for a whole day. I was terribly afraid lest I
should discover that my inspiration had left me—when suddenly I was
seized with the idea that I had forgotten to write out the song of the
helmsman in the first act, although, as a matter of fact, I could not
remember having composed it at all, as I had in reality only just written the
lyrics. I succeeded, and was pleased with the result. The same thing
occurred with the ‘Spinner’s Song,’ and when I had written out these two
pieces, and, on further reflection, could not help admitting that they had
really only taken shape in my mind at that moment, I was quite delirious
with joy at the discovery. In seven weeks the whole of the music of the
Fliegender Holländer, except the orchestration, was finished.
Thereupon followed a general revival in our circle; my exuberant good
spirits astonished every one, and my Avenarius relations in particular
thought I must really be prospering, as I was such good company. I resumed
my long walks in the woods of Meudon, frequently even consenting to help
Minna gather mushrooms, which, unfortunately, were for her the chief
charm of our woodland retreat, though it filled our landlord with terror
when he saw us returning with our spoils, as he felt sure we should be
poisoned if we ate them.
My destiny, which almost invariably led me into strange adventures, here
once more introduced me to the most eccentric character to be found not
only in the neighbourhood of Meudon, but even in Paris. This was M. Jadin,
who, though he was old enough to be able to say that he remembered seeing
Madame de Pompadour at Versailles, was still vigorous beyond belief. It
libretto of the Fliegender Holländer, which I had hurriedly written during
the recent period of distress, aroused considerable interest in Lehrs; he
actually declared I would never write anything better, and that the
Fliegender Holländer would be my Don Juan; the only thing now was to
find the music for it. As towards the end of the previous winter I still
entertained the hopes of being permitted to treat this subject for the French
Opera, I had already finished some of the words and music of the lyric
parts, and had had the libretto translated by Emile Deschamps, intending it
for a trial performance, which, alas, never took place. These parts were the
ballad of Senta, the song of the Norwegian sailors, and the ‘Spectre Song’
of the crew of the Fliegender Holländer. Since that time I had been so
violently torn away from the music that, when the piano arrived at my rustic
retreat, I did not dare to touch it for a whole day. I was terribly afraid lest I
should discover that my inspiration had left me—when suddenly I was
seized with the idea that I had forgotten to write out the song of the
helmsman in the first act, although, as a matter of fact, I could not
remember having composed it at all, as I had in reality only just written the
lyrics. I succeeded, and was pleased with the result. The same thing
occurred with the ‘Spinner’s Song,’ and when I had written out these two
pieces, and, on further reflection, could not help admitting that they had
really only taken shape in my mind at that moment, I was quite delirious
with joy at the discovery. In seven weeks the whole of the music of the
Fliegender Holländer, except the orchestration, was finished.
Thereupon followed a general revival in our circle; my exuberant good
spirits astonished every one, and my Avenarius relations in particular
thought I must really be prospering, as I was such good company. I resumed
my long walks in the woods of Meudon, frequently even consenting to help
Minna gather mushrooms, which, unfortunately, were for her the chief
charm of our woodland retreat, though it filled our landlord with terror
when he saw us returning with our spoils, as he felt sure we should be
poisoned if we ate them.
My destiny, which almost invariably led me into strange adventures, here
once more introduced me to the most eccentric character to be found not
only in the neighbourhood of Meudon, but even in Paris. This was M. Jadin,
who, though he was old enough to be able to say that he remembered seeing
Madame de Pompadour at Versailles, was still vigorous beyond belief. It
Page 230
appeared to be his aim to keep the world in a constant state of conjecture as
to his real age; he made everything for himself with his own hands,
including even a quantity of wigs of every shade, ranging in the most comic
variety from youthful flaxen to the most venerable white, with intermediate
shades of grey; these he wore alternately, as the fancy pleased him. He
dabbled in everything, and I was pleased to find he had a particular fancy
for painting. The fact that all the walls of his rooms were hung with the
most childish caricatures of animal life, and that he had even embellished
the outside of his blinds with the most ridiculous paintings, did not
disconcert me in the least; on the contrary, it confirmed my belief that he
did not dabble in music, until, to my horror, I discovered that the strangely
discordant sounds of a harp which kept reaching my ears from some
unknown region were actually proceeding from his basement, where he had
two harpsichords of his own invention. He informed me that he had
unfortunately neglected playing them for a long time, but that he now meant
to begin practising again assiduously in order to give me pleasure. I
succeeded in dissuading him from this, by assuring him that the doctor had
forbidden me to listen to the harp, as it was bad for my nerves. His figure as
I saw him for the last time remains impressed on my memory, like an
apparition from the world of Hoffmann’s fairy-tales. In the late autumn,
when we were going back to Paris, he asked us to take with us on our
furniture van an enormous stove-pipe, of which he promised to relieve us
shortly. One very cold day Jadin actually presented himself at our new
abode in Paris, in a most preposterous costume of his own manufacture,
consisting of very thin light-yellow trousers, a very short pale-green dress-
coat with conspicuously long tails, projecting lace shirt frills and cuffs, a
very fair wig, and a hat so small that it was constantly dropping off; he wore
in addition a quantity of imitation jewellery—and all this on the
undisguised assumption that he could not go about in fashionable Paris
dressed as simply as in the country. He had come for the stove-pipe; we
asked him where the men to carry it were; in reply he simply smiled, and
expressed his surprise at our helplessness; and thereupon took the enormous
stove-pipe under his arm and absolutely refused to accept our help when we
offered to assist him in carrying it down the stairs, though this operation,
notwithstanding his vaunted skill, occupied him quite half an hour. Every
one in the house assembled to witness this removal, but he was by no means
disconcerted, and managed to get the pipe through the street door, and then
to his real age; he made everything for himself with his own hands,
including even a quantity of wigs of every shade, ranging in the most comic
variety from youthful flaxen to the most venerable white, with intermediate
shades of grey; these he wore alternately, as the fancy pleased him. He
dabbled in everything, and I was pleased to find he had a particular fancy
for painting. The fact that all the walls of his rooms were hung with the
most childish caricatures of animal life, and that he had even embellished
the outside of his blinds with the most ridiculous paintings, did not
disconcert me in the least; on the contrary, it confirmed my belief that he
did not dabble in music, until, to my horror, I discovered that the strangely
discordant sounds of a harp which kept reaching my ears from some
unknown region were actually proceeding from his basement, where he had
two harpsichords of his own invention. He informed me that he had
unfortunately neglected playing them for a long time, but that he now meant
to begin practising again assiduously in order to give me pleasure. I
succeeded in dissuading him from this, by assuring him that the doctor had
forbidden me to listen to the harp, as it was bad for my nerves. His figure as
I saw him for the last time remains impressed on my memory, like an
apparition from the world of Hoffmann’s fairy-tales. In the late autumn,
when we were going back to Paris, he asked us to take with us on our
furniture van an enormous stove-pipe, of which he promised to relieve us
shortly. One very cold day Jadin actually presented himself at our new
abode in Paris, in a most preposterous costume of his own manufacture,
consisting of very thin light-yellow trousers, a very short pale-green dress-
coat with conspicuously long tails, projecting lace shirt frills and cuffs, a
very fair wig, and a hat so small that it was constantly dropping off; he wore
in addition a quantity of imitation jewellery—and all this on the
undisguised assumption that he could not go about in fashionable Paris
dressed as simply as in the country. He had come for the stove-pipe; we
asked him where the men to carry it were; in reply he simply smiled, and
expressed his surprise at our helplessness; and thereupon took the enormous
stove-pipe under his arm and absolutely refused to accept our help when we
offered to assist him in carrying it down the stairs, though this operation,
notwithstanding his vaunted skill, occupied him quite half an hour. Every
one in the house assembled to witness this removal, but he was by no means
disconcerted, and managed to get the pipe through the street door, and then
Page 231
tripped gracefully along the pavement with it, and disappeared from our
sight.
For this short though eventful period, during which I was quite free to
give full scope to my inmost thoughts, I indulged in the consolation of
purely artistic creations. I can only say that, when it came to an end, I had
made such progress that I could look forward with cheerful composure to
the much longer period of trouble and distress I felt was in store for me.
This, in fact, duly set in, for I had only just completed the last scene when I
found that my five hundred francs were coming to an end, and what was left
was not sufficient to secure me the necessary peace and freedom from
worry for composing the overture; I had to postpone this until my luck
should take another favourable turn, and meanwhile I was forced to engage
in the struggle for a bare subsistence, making efforts of all kinds that left me
neither leisure nor peace of mind. The concierge from the Rue du Helder
brought us the news that the mysterious family to whom we had let our
rooms had left, and that we were now once more responsible for the rent. I
had to tell him that I would not under any circumstances trouble about the
rooms any more, and that the landlord might recoup himself by the sale of
the furniture we had left there. This was done at a very heavy loss, and the
furniture, the greater part of which was still unpaid for, was sacrificed to
pay the rent of a dwelling which we no longer occupied.
Under the stress of the most terrible privations I still endeavoured to
secure sufficient leisure for working out the orchestration of the score of the
Fliegender Holländer. The rough autumn weather set in at an exceptionally
early date; people were all leaving their country houses for Paris, and,
among them, the Avenarius family. We, however, could not dream of doing
so, for we could not even raise the funds for the journey. When M. Jadin
expressed his surprise at this, I pretended to be so pressed with work that I
could not interrupt it, although I felt the cold that penetrated through the
thin walls of the house very severely.
So I waited for help from Ernst Castel, one of my old Königsberg friends,
a well-to-do young merchant, who a short time before had called on us in
Meudon and treated us to a luxurious repast in Paris, promising at the same
time to relieve our necessities as soon as possible by an advance, which we
knew was an easy matter to him.
sight.
For this short though eventful period, during which I was quite free to
give full scope to my inmost thoughts, I indulged in the consolation of
purely artistic creations. I can only say that, when it came to an end, I had
made such progress that I could look forward with cheerful composure to
the much longer period of trouble and distress I felt was in store for me.
This, in fact, duly set in, for I had only just completed the last scene when I
found that my five hundred francs were coming to an end, and what was left
was not sufficient to secure me the necessary peace and freedom from
worry for composing the overture; I had to postpone this until my luck
should take another favourable turn, and meanwhile I was forced to engage
in the struggle for a bare subsistence, making efforts of all kinds that left me
neither leisure nor peace of mind. The concierge from the Rue du Helder
brought us the news that the mysterious family to whom we had let our
rooms had left, and that we were now once more responsible for the rent. I
had to tell him that I would not under any circumstances trouble about the
rooms any more, and that the landlord might recoup himself by the sale of
the furniture we had left there. This was done at a very heavy loss, and the
furniture, the greater part of which was still unpaid for, was sacrificed to
pay the rent of a dwelling which we no longer occupied.
Under the stress of the most terrible privations I still endeavoured to
secure sufficient leisure for working out the orchestration of the score of the
Fliegender Holländer. The rough autumn weather set in at an exceptionally
early date; people were all leaving their country houses for Paris, and,
among them, the Avenarius family. We, however, could not dream of doing
so, for we could not even raise the funds for the journey. When M. Jadin
expressed his surprise at this, I pretended to be so pressed with work that I
could not interrupt it, although I felt the cold that penetrated through the
thin walls of the house very severely.
So I waited for help from Ernst Castel, one of my old Königsberg friends,
a well-to-do young merchant, who a short time before had called on us in
Meudon and treated us to a luxurious repast in Paris, promising at the same
time to relieve our necessities as soon as possible by an advance, which we
knew was an easy matter to him.
Page 232
By way of cheering us up, Kietz came over to us one day, with a large
portfolio and a pillow under his arm; he intended to amuse us by working at
a large caricature representing myself and my unfortunate adventures in
Paris, and the pillow was to enable him, after his labours, to get some rest
on our hard couch, which he had noticed had no pillows at the head.
Knowing that we had a difficulty in procuring fuel, he brought with him
some bottles of rum, to ‘warm’ us with punch during the cold evenings;
under these circumstances I read Hoffmann’s Tales to him and my wife.
At last I had news from Königsberg, but it only opened my eyes to the
fact that the gay young dog had not meant his promise seriously. We now
looked forward almost with despair to the chilly mists of approaching
winter, but Kietz, declaring that it was his place to find help, packed up his
portfolio, placed it under his arm with the pillow, and went off to Paris. On
the next day he returned with two hundred francs, that he had managed to
procure by means of generous self-sacrifice. We at once set off for Paris,
and took a small apartment near our friends, in the back part of No. 14 Rue
Jacob. I afterwards heard that shortly after we left it was occupied by
Proudhon.
We got back to town on 30th October. Our home was exceedingly small
and cold, and its chilliness in particular made it very bad for our health. We
furnished it scantily with the little we had saved from the wreck of the Rue
du Holder, and awaited the results of my efforts towards getting my works
accepted and produced in Germany. The first necessity was at all costs to
secure peace and quietness for myself for the short time which I should
have to devote to the overture of the Fliegender Holländer; I told Kietz that
he would have to procure the money necessary for my household expenses
until this work was finished and the full score of the opera sent off. With the
aid of a pedantic uncle, who had lived in Paris a long time and who was
also a painter, he succeeded in providing me with the necessary assistance,
in instalments of five or ten francs at a time. During this period I often
pointed with cheerful pride to my boots, which became mere travesties of
footgear, as the soles eventually disappeared altogether.
As long as I was engaged on the Dutchman, and Kietz was looking after
me, this made no difference, for I never went out: but when I had
despatched my completed score to the management of the Berlin Court
Theatre at the beginning of December, the bitterness of the position could
portfolio and a pillow under his arm; he intended to amuse us by working at
a large caricature representing myself and my unfortunate adventures in
Paris, and the pillow was to enable him, after his labours, to get some rest
on our hard couch, which he had noticed had no pillows at the head.
Knowing that we had a difficulty in procuring fuel, he brought with him
some bottles of rum, to ‘warm’ us with punch during the cold evenings;
under these circumstances I read Hoffmann’s Tales to him and my wife.
At last I had news from Königsberg, but it only opened my eyes to the
fact that the gay young dog had not meant his promise seriously. We now
looked forward almost with despair to the chilly mists of approaching
winter, but Kietz, declaring that it was his place to find help, packed up his
portfolio, placed it under his arm with the pillow, and went off to Paris. On
the next day he returned with two hundred francs, that he had managed to
procure by means of generous self-sacrifice. We at once set off for Paris,
and took a small apartment near our friends, in the back part of No. 14 Rue
Jacob. I afterwards heard that shortly after we left it was occupied by
Proudhon.
We got back to town on 30th October. Our home was exceedingly small
and cold, and its chilliness in particular made it very bad for our health. We
furnished it scantily with the little we had saved from the wreck of the Rue
du Holder, and awaited the results of my efforts towards getting my works
accepted and produced in Germany. The first necessity was at all costs to
secure peace and quietness for myself for the short time which I should
have to devote to the overture of the Fliegender Holländer; I told Kietz that
he would have to procure the money necessary for my household expenses
until this work was finished and the full score of the opera sent off. With the
aid of a pedantic uncle, who had lived in Paris a long time and who was
also a painter, he succeeded in providing me with the necessary assistance,
in instalments of five or ten francs at a time. During this period I often
pointed with cheerful pride to my boots, which became mere travesties of
footgear, as the soles eventually disappeared altogether.
As long as I was engaged on the Dutchman, and Kietz was looking after
me, this made no difference, for I never went out: but when I had
despatched my completed score to the management of the Berlin Court
Theatre at the beginning of December, the bitterness of the position could
Page 233
no longer be disguised. It was necessary for me to buckle to and look for
help myself.
What this meant in Paris I learned just about this time from the hapless
fate of the worthy Lehrs. Driven by need such as I myself had had to
surmount a year before at about the same time, he had been compelled on a
broiling hot day in the previous summer to scour the various quarters of the
city breathlessly, to get grace for bills he had accepted, and which had fallen
due. He foolishly took an iced drink, which he hoped would refresh him in
his distressing condition, but it immediately made him lose his voice, and
from that day he was the victim of a hoarseness which with terrific rapidity
ripened the seeds of consumption, doubtless latent in him, and developed
that incurable disease. For months he had been growing weaker and weaker,
filling us at last with the gloomiest anxiety: he alone believed the supposed
chill would be cured, if he could heat his room better for a time. One day I
sought him out in his lodging, where I found him in the icy-cold room,
huddled up at his writing-table, and complaining of the difficulty of his
work for Didot, which was all the more distressing as his employer was
pressing him for advances he had made.
He declared that if he had not had the consolation in those doleful hours
of knowing that I had, at any rate, got my Dutchman finished, and that a
prospect of success was thus opened to the little circle of friends, his misery
would have been hard indeed to bear. Despite my own great trouble, I
begged him to share our fire and work in my room. He smiled at my
courage in trying to help others, especially as my quarters offered barely
space enough for myself and my wife. However, one evening he came to us
and silently showed me a letter he had received from Villemain, the
Minister of Education at that time, in which the latter expressed in the
warmest terms his great regret at having only just learned that so
distinguished a scholar, whose able and extensive collaboration in Didot’s
issue of the Greek classics had made him participator in a work that was the
glory of the nation, should be in such bad health and straitened
circumstances. Unfortunately, the amount of public money which he had at
his disposal at that moment for subsidising literature only allowed of his
offering him the sum of five hundred francs, which he enclosed with
apologies, asking him to accept it as a recognition of his merits on the part
of the French Government, and adding that it was his intention to give
earnest consideration as to how he might materially improve his position.
help myself.
What this meant in Paris I learned just about this time from the hapless
fate of the worthy Lehrs. Driven by need such as I myself had had to
surmount a year before at about the same time, he had been compelled on a
broiling hot day in the previous summer to scour the various quarters of the
city breathlessly, to get grace for bills he had accepted, and which had fallen
due. He foolishly took an iced drink, which he hoped would refresh him in
his distressing condition, but it immediately made him lose his voice, and
from that day he was the victim of a hoarseness which with terrific rapidity
ripened the seeds of consumption, doubtless latent in him, and developed
that incurable disease. For months he had been growing weaker and weaker,
filling us at last with the gloomiest anxiety: he alone believed the supposed
chill would be cured, if he could heat his room better for a time. One day I
sought him out in his lodging, where I found him in the icy-cold room,
huddled up at his writing-table, and complaining of the difficulty of his
work for Didot, which was all the more distressing as his employer was
pressing him for advances he had made.
He declared that if he had not had the consolation in those doleful hours
of knowing that I had, at any rate, got my Dutchman finished, and that a
prospect of success was thus opened to the little circle of friends, his misery
would have been hard indeed to bear. Despite my own great trouble, I
begged him to share our fire and work in my room. He smiled at my
courage in trying to help others, especially as my quarters offered barely
space enough for myself and my wife. However, one evening he came to us
and silently showed me a letter he had received from Villemain, the
Minister of Education at that time, in which the latter expressed in the
warmest terms his great regret at having only just learned that so
distinguished a scholar, whose able and extensive collaboration in Didot’s
issue of the Greek classics had made him participator in a work that was the
glory of the nation, should be in such bad health and straitened
circumstances. Unfortunately, the amount of public money which he had at
his disposal at that moment for subsidising literature only allowed of his
offering him the sum of five hundred francs, which he enclosed with
apologies, asking him to accept it as a recognition of his merits on the part
of the French Government, and adding that it was his intention to give
earnest consideration as to how he might materially improve his position.
Page 234
This filled us with the utmost thankfulness on poor Lehrs’ account, and
we looked on the incident almost as a miracle. We could not help assuming,
however, that M. Villemain had been influenced by Didot, who had been
prompted by his own guilty conscience for his despicable exploitation of
Lehrs, and by the prospect of thus relieving himself of the responsibility of
helping him. At the same time, from similar cases within our knowledge,
which were fully confirmed by my own subsequent experience, we were
driven to the conclusion that such prompt and considerate sympathy on the
part of a minister would have been impossible in Germany. Lehrs would
now have a fire to work by, but alas! our fears as to his declining health
could not be allayed. When we left Paris in the following spring, it was the
certainty that we should never see our dear friend again that made our
parting so painful.
In my own great distress I was again exposed to the annoyance of having
to write numerous unpaid articles for the Abendzeitung, as my patron,
Hofrath Winkler, was still unable to give me any satisfactory account of the
fate of my Rienzi in Dresden. In these circumstances I was obliged to
consider it a good thing that Halevy’s latest opera was at last a success.
Schlesinger came to us radiant with joy at the success of La Reine de
Chypre, and promised me eternal bliss for the piano score and various other
arrangements I had made of this newest rage in the sphere of opera. So I
was again forced to pay the penalty for composing my own Fliegender
Holländer by having to sit down and write out arrangements of Halevy’s
opera. Yet this task no longer weighed on me so heavily. Apart from the
wellfounded hope of being at last recalled from my exile in Paris, and thus
being able, as I thought, to regard this last struggle with poverty as the
decisive one, the arrangement of Halevy’s score was far and away a more
interesting piece of hack-work than the shameful labour I had spent on
Donizetti’s Favorita.
I paid another visit, the last for a long time to come, to the Grand Opera
to hear this Reine de Chypre. There was, indeed, much for me to smile at.
My eyes were no longer shut to the extreme weakness of this class of work,
and the caricature of it that was often produced by the method of rendering
it. I was sincerely rejoiced to see the better side of Halevy again. I had taken
a great fancy to him from the time of his La Juive, and had a very high
opinion of his masterly talent.
we looked on the incident almost as a miracle. We could not help assuming,
however, that M. Villemain had been influenced by Didot, who had been
prompted by his own guilty conscience for his despicable exploitation of
Lehrs, and by the prospect of thus relieving himself of the responsibility of
helping him. At the same time, from similar cases within our knowledge,
which were fully confirmed by my own subsequent experience, we were
driven to the conclusion that such prompt and considerate sympathy on the
part of a minister would have been impossible in Germany. Lehrs would
now have a fire to work by, but alas! our fears as to his declining health
could not be allayed. When we left Paris in the following spring, it was the
certainty that we should never see our dear friend again that made our
parting so painful.
In my own great distress I was again exposed to the annoyance of having
to write numerous unpaid articles for the Abendzeitung, as my patron,
Hofrath Winkler, was still unable to give me any satisfactory account of the
fate of my Rienzi in Dresden. In these circumstances I was obliged to
consider it a good thing that Halevy’s latest opera was at last a success.
Schlesinger came to us radiant with joy at the success of La Reine de
Chypre, and promised me eternal bliss for the piano score and various other
arrangements I had made of this newest rage in the sphere of opera. So I
was again forced to pay the penalty for composing my own Fliegender
Holländer by having to sit down and write out arrangements of Halevy’s
opera. Yet this task no longer weighed on me so heavily. Apart from the
wellfounded hope of being at last recalled from my exile in Paris, and thus
being able, as I thought, to regard this last struggle with poverty as the
decisive one, the arrangement of Halevy’s score was far and away a more
interesting piece of hack-work than the shameful labour I had spent on
Donizetti’s Favorita.
I paid another visit, the last for a long time to come, to the Grand Opera
to hear this Reine de Chypre. There was, indeed, much for me to smile at.
My eyes were no longer shut to the extreme weakness of this class of work,
and the caricature of it that was often produced by the method of rendering
it. I was sincerely rejoiced to see the better side of Halevy again. I had taken
a great fancy to him from the time of his La Juive, and had a very high
opinion of his masterly talent.
Page 235
At the request of Schlesinger I also willingly consented to write for his
paper a long article on Halevy’s latest work. In it I laid particular stress on
my hope that the French school might not again allow the benefits obtained
by studying the German style to be lost by relapsing into the shallowest
Italian methods. On that occasion I ventured, by way of encouraging the
French school, to point to the peculiar significance of Auber, and
particularly to his Stumme von Portici, drawing attention, on the other
hand, to the overloaded melodies of Rossini, which often resembled sol-fa
exercises. In reading over the proof of my article I saw that this passage
about Rossini had been left out, and M. Edouard Monnaie admitted to me
that, in his capacity as editor of a musical paper, he had felt himself bound
to suppress it. He considered that if I had any adverse criticism to pass on
the composer, I could easily get it published in any other kind of paper, but
not in one devoted to the interests of music, simply because such a passage
could not be printed there without seeming absurd. It also annoyed him that
I had spoken in such high terms of Auber, but he let it stand. I had to listen
to much from that quarter which enlightened me for ever with regard to the
decay of operatic music in particular, and artistic taste in general, among
Frenchmen of the present day.
I also wrote a longer article on the same opera for my precious friend
Winkler at Dresden, who was still hesitating about accepting my Rienzi. In
doing so I intentionally made merry over a mishap that had befallen
Lachner the conductor. Küstner, who was theatrical director at Munich at
the time, with a view to giving his friend another chance, ordered a libretto
to be written for him by St. Georges in Paris, so that, through his paternal
care, the highest bliss which a German composer could dream of might be
assured to his protege. Well, it turned out that when Halevy’s Reine de
Chypre appeared, it treated the same subject as Lachner’s presumably
original work, which had been composed in the meantime. It mattered very
little that the libretto was a really good one, the value of the bargain lay in
the fact that it was to be glorified by Lachner’s music. It appeared, however,
that St. Georges had, as a matter of fact, to some extent altered the book
sent to Munich, but only by the omission of several interesting features. The
fury of the Munich manager was great, whereupon St. Georges declared his
astonishment that the latter could have imagined he would supply a libretto
intended solely for the German stage at the paltry price offered by his
German customer. As I had formed my own private opinion as to procuring
paper a long article on Halevy’s latest work. In it I laid particular stress on
my hope that the French school might not again allow the benefits obtained
by studying the German style to be lost by relapsing into the shallowest
Italian methods. On that occasion I ventured, by way of encouraging the
French school, to point to the peculiar significance of Auber, and
particularly to his Stumme von Portici, drawing attention, on the other
hand, to the overloaded melodies of Rossini, which often resembled sol-fa
exercises. In reading over the proof of my article I saw that this passage
about Rossini had been left out, and M. Edouard Monnaie admitted to me
that, in his capacity as editor of a musical paper, he had felt himself bound
to suppress it. He considered that if I had any adverse criticism to pass on
the composer, I could easily get it published in any other kind of paper, but
not in one devoted to the interests of music, simply because such a passage
could not be printed there without seeming absurd. It also annoyed him that
I had spoken in such high terms of Auber, but he let it stand. I had to listen
to much from that quarter which enlightened me for ever with regard to the
decay of operatic music in particular, and artistic taste in general, among
Frenchmen of the present day.
I also wrote a longer article on the same opera for my precious friend
Winkler at Dresden, who was still hesitating about accepting my Rienzi. In
doing so I intentionally made merry over a mishap that had befallen
Lachner the conductor. Küstner, who was theatrical director at Munich at
the time, with a view to giving his friend another chance, ordered a libretto
to be written for him by St. Georges in Paris, so that, through his paternal
care, the highest bliss which a German composer could dream of might be
assured to his protege. Well, it turned out that when Halevy’s Reine de
Chypre appeared, it treated the same subject as Lachner’s presumably
original work, which had been composed in the meantime. It mattered very
little that the libretto was a really good one, the value of the bargain lay in
the fact that it was to be glorified by Lachner’s music. It appeared, however,
that St. Georges had, as a matter of fact, to some extent altered the book
sent to Munich, but only by the omission of several interesting features. The
fury of the Munich manager was great, whereupon St. Georges declared his
astonishment that the latter could have imagined he would supply a libretto
intended solely for the German stage at the paltry price offered by his
German customer. As I had formed my own private opinion as to procuring
Page 236
French librettos for operas, and as nothing in the world would have induced
me to set to music even the most effective piece of writing by Scribe or St.
Georges, this occurrence delighted me immensely, and in the best of spirits
I let myself go on the point for the benefit of the readers of the
Abendzeitung, who, it is to be hoped, did not include my future ‘friend’
Lachner.
In addition, my work on Halevy’s opera (Reine de Chypre) brought me
into closer contact with that composer, and was the means of procuring me
many an enlivening talk with that peculiarly good-hearted and really
unassuming man, whose talent, alas, declined all too soon. Schlesinger, in
fact, was exasperated at his incorrigible laziness. Halevy, who had looked
through my piano score, contemplated several changes with a view to
making it easier, but he did not proceed with them: Schlesinger could not
get the proof-sheets back; the publication was consequently delayed, and he
feared that the popularity of the opera would be over before the work was
ready for the public. He urged me to get firm hold of Halevy very early in
the morning in his rooms, and compel him to set to work at the alterations
in my company.
The first time I reached his house at about ten in the morning, I found
him just out of bed, and he informed me that he really must have breakfast
first. I accepted his invitation, and sat down with him to a somewhat
luxurious meal; my conversation seemed to appeal to him, but friends came
in, and at last Schlesinger among the number, who burst into a fury at not
finding him at work on the proofs he regarded as so important. Halevy,
however, remained quite unmoved. In the best of good tempers he merely
complained of his latest success, because he had never had more peace than
of late, when his operas, almost without exception, had been failures, and
he had not had anything to do with them after the first production.
Moreover, he feigned not to understand why this Reine de Chypre in
particular should have been a success; he declared that Schlesinger had
engineered it on purpose to worry him. When he spoke a few words to me
in German, one of the visitors was astonished, whereupon Schlesinger said
that all Jews could speak German. Thereupon Schlesinger was asked if he
also was a Jew. He answered that he had been, but had become a Christian
for his wife’s sake. This freedom of speech was a pleasant surprise to me,
because in Germany in such cases we always studiously avoided the point,
as discourteous to the person referred to. But as we never got to the proof
me to set to music even the most effective piece of writing by Scribe or St.
Georges, this occurrence delighted me immensely, and in the best of spirits
I let myself go on the point for the benefit of the readers of the
Abendzeitung, who, it is to be hoped, did not include my future ‘friend’
Lachner.
In addition, my work on Halevy’s opera (Reine de Chypre) brought me
into closer contact with that composer, and was the means of procuring me
many an enlivening talk with that peculiarly good-hearted and really
unassuming man, whose talent, alas, declined all too soon. Schlesinger, in
fact, was exasperated at his incorrigible laziness. Halevy, who had looked
through my piano score, contemplated several changes with a view to
making it easier, but he did not proceed with them: Schlesinger could not
get the proof-sheets back; the publication was consequently delayed, and he
feared that the popularity of the opera would be over before the work was
ready for the public. He urged me to get firm hold of Halevy very early in
the morning in his rooms, and compel him to set to work at the alterations
in my company.
The first time I reached his house at about ten in the morning, I found
him just out of bed, and he informed me that he really must have breakfast
first. I accepted his invitation, and sat down with him to a somewhat
luxurious meal; my conversation seemed to appeal to him, but friends came
in, and at last Schlesinger among the number, who burst into a fury at not
finding him at work on the proofs he regarded as so important. Halevy,
however, remained quite unmoved. In the best of good tempers he merely
complained of his latest success, because he had never had more peace than
of late, when his operas, almost without exception, had been failures, and
he had not had anything to do with them after the first production.
Moreover, he feigned not to understand why this Reine de Chypre in
particular should have been a success; he declared that Schlesinger had
engineered it on purpose to worry him. When he spoke a few words to me
in German, one of the visitors was astonished, whereupon Schlesinger said
that all Jews could speak German. Thereupon Schlesinger was asked if he
also was a Jew. He answered that he had been, but had become a Christian
for his wife’s sake. This freedom of speech was a pleasant surprise to me,
because in Germany in such cases we always studiously avoided the point,
as discourteous to the person referred to. But as we never got to the proof
Page 237
correcting, Schlesinger made me promise to give Halevy no peace until we
had done them.
The secret of his indifference to success became clear to me in the course
of further conversation, as I learned that he was on the point of making a
wealthy marriage. At first I was inclined to think that Halevy was simply a
man whose youthful talent was only stimulated to achieve one great success
with the object of becoming rich; in his case, however, this was not the only
reason, as he was very modest in regard to his own capacity, and had no
great opinion of the works of those more fortunate composers who were
writing for the French stage at that time. In him I thus, for the first time, met
with the frankly expressed admission of disbelief in the value of all our
modern creations in this dubious field of art. I have since come to the
conclusion that this incredulity, often expressed with much less modesty,
justifies the participation of all Jews in our artistic concerns. Only once did
Halevy speak to me with real candour, when, on my tardy departure for
Germany, he wished me the success he thought my works deserved.
In the year 1860 I saw him again. I had learned that, while the Parisian
critics were giving vent to the bitterest condemnation of the concerts I was
giving at that time, he had expressed his approval, and this determined me
to visit him at the Palais de l’Institut, of which he had for some time been
permanent secretary. He seemed particularly eager to learn from my own
lips what my new theory about music really was, of which he had heard
such wild rumours. For his own part, he said, he had never found anything
but music in my music, but with this difference, that mine had generally
seemed very good. This gave rise to a lively discussion on my part, to
which he good-humouredly agreed, once more wishing me success in Paris.
This time, however, he did so with less conviction than when he bade me
good-bye for Germany, which I thought was because he doubted whether I
could succeed in Paris. From this final visit I carried away a depressing
sense of the enervation, both moral and aesthetic, which had overcome one
of the last great French musicians, while, on the other hand, I could not help
feeling that a tendency to a hypocritical or frankly impudent exploitation of
the universal degeneracy marked all who could be designated as Halevy’s
successors.
Throughout this period of constant hack-work my thoughts were entirely
bent on my return to Germany, which now presented itself to my mind in a
had done them.
The secret of his indifference to success became clear to me in the course
of further conversation, as I learned that he was on the point of making a
wealthy marriage. At first I was inclined to think that Halevy was simply a
man whose youthful talent was only stimulated to achieve one great success
with the object of becoming rich; in his case, however, this was not the only
reason, as he was very modest in regard to his own capacity, and had no
great opinion of the works of those more fortunate composers who were
writing for the French stage at that time. In him I thus, for the first time, met
with the frankly expressed admission of disbelief in the value of all our
modern creations in this dubious field of art. I have since come to the
conclusion that this incredulity, often expressed with much less modesty,
justifies the participation of all Jews in our artistic concerns. Only once did
Halevy speak to me with real candour, when, on my tardy departure for
Germany, he wished me the success he thought my works deserved.
In the year 1860 I saw him again. I had learned that, while the Parisian
critics were giving vent to the bitterest condemnation of the concerts I was
giving at that time, he had expressed his approval, and this determined me
to visit him at the Palais de l’Institut, of which he had for some time been
permanent secretary. He seemed particularly eager to learn from my own
lips what my new theory about music really was, of which he had heard
such wild rumours. For his own part, he said, he had never found anything
but music in my music, but with this difference, that mine had generally
seemed very good. This gave rise to a lively discussion on my part, to
which he good-humouredly agreed, once more wishing me success in Paris.
This time, however, he did so with less conviction than when he bade me
good-bye for Germany, which I thought was because he doubted whether I
could succeed in Paris. From this final visit I carried away a depressing
sense of the enervation, both moral and aesthetic, which had overcome one
of the last great French musicians, while, on the other hand, I could not help
feeling that a tendency to a hypocritical or frankly impudent exploitation of
the universal degeneracy marked all who could be designated as Halevy’s
successors.
Throughout this period of constant hack-work my thoughts were entirely
bent on my return to Germany, which now presented itself to my mind in a
Page 238
wholly new and ideal light. I endeavoured in various ways to secure all that
seemed most attractive about the project, or which filled my soul with
longing. My intercourse with Lehrs had, on the whole, given a decided spur
to my former tendency to grapple seriously with my subjects, a tendency
which had been counteracted by closer contact with the theatre. This desire
now furnished a basis for closer study of philosophical questions. I had
been astonished at times to hear even the grave and virtuous Lehrs, openly
and quite as a matter of course, give expression to grave doubts concerning
our individual survival after death. He declared that in many great men this
doubt, even though only tacitly held, had been the real incitement to noble
deeds. The natural result of such a belief speedily dawned on me without,
however, causing me any serious alarm. On the contrary, I found a
fascinating stimulus in the fact that boundless regions of meditation and
knowledge were thereby opened up which hitherto I had merely skimmed in
light-hearted levity.
In my renewed attempts to study the Greek classics in the original, I
received no encouragement from Lehrs. He dissuaded me from doing so
with the well-meant consolation, that as I could only be born once, and that
with music in me, I should learn to understand this branch of knowledge
without the help of grammar or lexicon; whereas if Greek were to be
studied with real enjoyment, it was no joke, and would not suffer being
relegated to a secondary place.
On the other hand, I felt strongly drawn to gain a closer acquaintance of
German history than I had secured at school. I had Raumer’s History of the
Hohenstaufen within easy reach to start upon. All the great figures in this
book lived vividly before my eyes. I was particularly captivated by the
personality of that gifted Emperor Frederick II., whose fortunes aroused my
sympathy so keenly that I vainly sought for a fitting artistic setting for
them. The fate of his son Manfred, on the other hand, provoked in me an
equally well-grounded, but more easily combated, feeling of opposition.
I accordingly made a plan of a great five-act dramatic poem, which
should also be perfectly adapted to a musical setting. My impulse to
embellish the story with the central figure of romantic significance was
prompted by the fact of Manfred’s enthusiastic reception in Luceria by the
Saracens, who supported him and carried him on from victory to victory till
he reached his final triumph, and this, too, in spite of the fact that he had
seemed most attractive about the project, or which filled my soul with
longing. My intercourse with Lehrs had, on the whole, given a decided spur
to my former tendency to grapple seriously with my subjects, a tendency
which had been counteracted by closer contact with the theatre. This desire
now furnished a basis for closer study of philosophical questions. I had
been astonished at times to hear even the grave and virtuous Lehrs, openly
and quite as a matter of course, give expression to grave doubts concerning
our individual survival after death. He declared that in many great men this
doubt, even though only tacitly held, had been the real incitement to noble
deeds. The natural result of such a belief speedily dawned on me without,
however, causing me any serious alarm. On the contrary, I found a
fascinating stimulus in the fact that boundless regions of meditation and
knowledge were thereby opened up which hitherto I had merely skimmed in
light-hearted levity.
In my renewed attempts to study the Greek classics in the original, I
received no encouragement from Lehrs. He dissuaded me from doing so
with the well-meant consolation, that as I could only be born once, and that
with music in me, I should learn to understand this branch of knowledge
without the help of grammar or lexicon; whereas if Greek were to be
studied with real enjoyment, it was no joke, and would not suffer being
relegated to a secondary place.
On the other hand, I felt strongly drawn to gain a closer acquaintance of
German history than I had secured at school. I had Raumer’s History of the
Hohenstaufen within easy reach to start upon. All the great figures in this
book lived vividly before my eyes. I was particularly captivated by the
personality of that gifted Emperor Frederick II., whose fortunes aroused my
sympathy so keenly that I vainly sought for a fitting artistic setting for
them. The fate of his son Manfred, on the other hand, provoked in me an
equally well-grounded, but more easily combated, feeling of opposition.
I accordingly made a plan of a great five-act dramatic poem, which
should also be perfectly adapted to a musical setting. My impulse to
embellish the story with the central figure of romantic significance was
prompted by the fact of Manfred’s enthusiastic reception in Luceria by the
Saracens, who supported him and carried him on from victory to victory till
he reached his final triumph, and this, too, in spite of the fact that he had
Page 239
come to them betrayed on every hand, banned by the Church, and deserted
by all his followers during his flight through Apulia and the Abruzzi.
Even at this time it delighted me to find in the German mind the capacity
of appreciating beyond the narrow bounds of nationality all purely human
qualities, in however strange a garb they might be presented. For in this I
recognised how nearly akin it is to the mind of Greece. In Frederick II. I
saw this quality in full flower. A fair-haired German of ancient Swabian
stock, heir to the Norman realm of Sicily and Naples, who gave the Italian
language its first development, and laid a basis for the evolution of
knowledge and art where hitherto ecclesiastical fanaticism and feudal
brutality had alone contended for power, a monarch who gathered at his
court the poets and sages of eastern lands, and surrounded himself with the
living products of Arabian and Persian grace and spirit—this man I beheld
betrayed by the Roman clergy to the infidel foe, yet ending his crusade, to
their bitter disappointment, by a pact of peace with the Sultan, from whom
he obtained a grant of privileges to Christians in Palestine such as the
bloodiest victory could scarcely have secured.
In this wonderful Emperor, who finally, under the ban of that same
Church, struggled hopelessly and in vain against the savage bigotry of his
age, I beheld the German ideal in its highest embodiment. My poem was
concerned with the fate of his favourite son Manfred. On the death of an
elder brother, Frederick’s empire had entirely fallen to pieces, and the
young Manfred was left, under papal suzerainty, in nominal possession of
the throne of Apulia. We find him at Capua, in surroundings, and attended
by a court, in which the spirit of his great father survives, in a state of
almost effeminate degeneration. In despair of ever restoring the imperial
power of the Hohenstaufen, he seeks to forget his sadness in romance and
song. There now appears upon the scene a young Saracen lady, just arrived
from the East, who, by appealing to the alliance between East and West
concluded by Manfred’s noble father, conjures the desponding son to
maintain his imperial heritage. She acts the part of an inspired prophetess,
and though the prince is quickly filled with love for her, she succeeds in
keeping him at a respectful distance. By a skilfully contrived flight she
snatches him, not only from the pursuit of rebellious Apulian nobles, but
also from the papal ban which is threatening to depose him from his throne.
Accompanied only by a few faithful followers, she guides him through
mountain fastnesses, where one night the wearied son beholds the spirit of
by all his followers during his flight through Apulia and the Abruzzi.
Even at this time it delighted me to find in the German mind the capacity
of appreciating beyond the narrow bounds of nationality all purely human
qualities, in however strange a garb they might be presented. For in this I
recognised how nearly akin it is to the mind of Greece. In Frederick II. I
saw this quality in full flower. A fair-haired German of ancient Swabian
stock, heir to the Norman realm of Sicily and Naples, who gave the Italian
language its first development, and laid a basis for the evolution of
knowledge and art where hitherto ecclesiastical fanaticism and feudal
brutality had alone contended for power, a monarch who gathered at his
court the poets and sages of eastern lands, and surrounded himself with the
living products of Arabian and Persian grace and spirit—this man I beheld
betrayed by the Roman clergy to the infidel foe, yet ending his crusade, to
their bitter disappointment, by a pact of peace with the Sultan, from whom
he obtained a grant of privileges to Christians in Palestine such as the
bloodiest victory could scarcely have secured.
In this wonderful Emperor, who finally, under the ban of that same
Church, struggled hopelessly and in vain against the savage bigotry of his
age, I beheld the German ideal in its highest embodiment. My poem was
concerned with the fate of his favourite son Manfred. On the death of an
elder brother, Frederick’s empire had entirely fallen to pieces, and the
young Manfred was left, under papal suzerainty, in nominal possession of
the throne of Apulia. We find him at Capua, in surroundings, and attended
by a court, in which the spirit of his great father survives, in a state of
almost effeminate degeneration. In despair of ever restoring the imperial
power of the Hohenstaufen, he seeks to forget his sadness in romance and
song. There now appears upon the scene a young Saracen lady, just arrived
from the East, who, by appealing to the alliance between East and West
concluded by Manfred’s noble father, conjures the desponding son to
maintain his imperial heritage. She acts the part of an inspired prophetess,
and though the prince is quickly filled with love for her, she succeeds in
keeping him at a respectful distance. By a skilfully contrived flight she
snatches him, not only from the pursuit of rebellious Apulian nobles, but
also from the papal ban which is threatening to depose him from his throne.
Accompanied only by a few faithful followers, she guides him through
mountain fastnesses, where one night the wearied son beholds the spirit of
Page 240
Frederick II. passing with feudal array through the Abruzzi, and beckoning
him on to Luceria.
To this district, situated in the Papal States, Frederick had, by a peaceful
compact, transplanted the remnant of his Saracen retainers, who had
previously been wreaking terrible havoc in the mountains of Sicily. To the
great annoyance of the Pope, he had handed the town over to them in fee-
simple, thus securing for himself a band of faithful allies in the heart of an
ever-treacherous and hostile country.
Fatima, as my heroine is called, has prepared, through the instrumentality
of trusty friends, a reception for Manfred in this place. When the papal
governor has been expelled by a revolution, he slips through the gateway
into the town, is recognised by the whole population as the son of their
beloved Emperor, and, amid wildest enthusiasm, is placed at their head, to
lead them against the enemies of their departed benefactor. In the meantime,
while Manfred is marching on from victory to victory in his reconquest of
the whole kingdom of Apulia, the tragic centre of my action still continues
to be the unvoiced longing of the lovelorn victor for the marvellous heroine.
She is the child of the great Emperor’s love for a noble Saracen maiden.
Her mother, on her deathbed, had sent her to Manfred, foretelling that she
would work wonders for his glory provided she never yielded to his
passion. Whether Fatima was to know that she was his sister I left
undecided in framing my plot. Meanwhile she is careful to show herself to
him only at critical moments, and then always in such a way as to remain
unapproachable. When at last she witnesses the completion of her task in
his coronation at Naples, she determines, in obedience to her vow, to slip
away secretly from the newly anointed king, that she may meditate in the
solitude of her distant home upon the success of her enterprise.
The Saracen Nurreddin, who had been a companion of her youth, and to
whose help she had chiefly owed her success in rescuing Manfred, is to be
the sole partner of her flight. To this man, who loves her with passionate
ardour, she had been promised in her childhood. Before her secret departure
she pays a last visit to the slumbering king. This rouses her lover’s furious
jealousy, as he construes her act into a proof of unfaithfulness on the part of
his betrothed. The last look of farewell which Fatima casts from a distance
at the young monarch, on his return from his coronation, inflames the
jealous lover to wreak instant vengeance for the supposed outrage upon his
him on to Luceria.
To this district, situated in the Papal States, Frederick had, by a peaceful
compact, transplanted the remnant of his Saracen retainers, who had
previously been wreaking terrible havoc in the mountains of Sicily. To the
great annoyance of the Pope, he had handed the town over to them in fee-
simple, thus securing for himself a band of faithful allies in the heart of an
ever-treacherous and hostile country.
Fatima, as my heroine is called, has prepared, through the instrumentality
of trusty friends, a reception for Manfred in this place. When the papal
governor has been expelled by a revolution, he slips through the gateway
into the town, is recognised by the whole population as the son of their
beloved Emperor, and, amid wildest enthusiasm, is placed at their head, to
lead them against the enemies of their departed benefactor. In the meantime,
while Manfred is marching on from victory to victory in his reconquest of
the whole kingdom of Apulia, the tragic centre of my action still continues
to be the unvoiced longing of the lovelorn victor for the marvellous heroine.
She is the child of the great Emperor’s love for a noble Saracen maiden.
Her mother, on her deathbed, had sent her to Manfred, foretelling that she
would work wonders for his glory provided she never yielded to his
passion. Whether Fatima was to know that she was his sister I left
undecided in framing my plot. Meanwhile she is careful to show herself to
him only at critical moments, and then always in such a way as to remain
unapproachable. When at last she witnesses the completion of her task in
his coronation at Naples, she determines, in obedience to her vow, to slip
away secretly from the newly anointed king, that she may meditate in the
solitude of her distant home upon the success of her enterprise.
The Saracen Nurreddin, who had been a companion of her youth, and to
whose help she had chiefly owed her success in rescuing Manfred, is to be
the sole partner of her flight. To this man, who loves her with passionate
ardour, she had been promised in her childhood. Before her secret departure
she pays a last visit to the slumbering king. This rouses her lover’s furious
jealousy, as he construes her act into a proof of unfaithfulness on the part of
his betrothed. The last look of farewell which Fatima casts from a distance
at the young monarch, on his return from his coronation, inflames the
jealous lover to wreak instant vengeance for the supposed outrage upon his
Page 241
honour. He strikes the prophetess to the earth, whereupon she thanks him
with a smile for having delivered her from an unbearable existence. At the
sight of her body Manfred realises that henceforth happiness has deserted
him for ever.
This theme I had adorned with many gorgeous scenes and complicated
situations, so that when I had worked it out I could regard it as a fairly
suitable, interesting, and effective whole, especially when compared with
other well-known subjects of a similar nature. Yet I could never rouse
myself to sufficient enthusiasm over it to give my serious attention to its
elaboration, especially as another theme now laid its grip upon me. This
was suggested to me by a pamphlet on the ‘Venusberg,’ which accidentally
fell into my hands.
If all that I regarded as essentially German had hitherto drawn me with
ever-increasing force, and compelled me to its eager pursuit, I here found it
suddenly presented to me in the simple outlines of a legend, based upon the
old and well-known ballad of ‘Tannhäuser.’ True, its elements were already
familiar to me from Tieck’s version in his Phantasus. But his conception of
the subject had flung me back into the fantastic regions created in my mind
at an earlier period by Hoffmann, and I should certainly never have been
tempted to extract the framework of a dramatic work from his elaborate
story. The point in this popular pamphlet which had so much weight with
me was that it brought ‘Tannhäuser,’ if only by a passing hint, into touch
with ‘The Minstrel’s War on the Wartburg.’ I had some knowledge of this
also from Hoffmann’s account in his Serapionsbrudern. But I felt that the
writer had only grasped the old legend in a distorted form, and therefore
endeavoured to gain a closer acquaintance with the true aspect of this
attractive story. At this juncture Lehrs brought me the annual report of the
proceedings of the Königsberg German Society, in which the ‘Wartburg
contest’ was criticised with a fair amount of detail by Lukas. Here I also
found the original text. Although I could utilise but little of the real setting
for my own purpose, yet the picture it gave me of Germany in the Middle
Ages was so suggestive that I found I had not previously had the smallest
conception of what it was like.
As a sequel to the Wartburg poem, I also found in the same copy a
critical study, ‘Lohengrin,’ which gave in full detail the main contents of
that widespread epic.
with a smile for having delivered her from an unbearable existence. At the
sight of her body Manfred realises that henceforth happiness has deserted
him for ever.
This theme I had adorned with many gorgeous scenes and complicated
situations, so that when I had worked it out I could regard it as a fairly
suitable, interesting, and effective whole, especially when compared with
other well-known subjects of a similar nature. Yet I could never rouse
myself to sufficient enthusiasm over it to give my serious attention to its
elaboration, especially as another theme now laid its grip upon me. This
was suggested to me by a pamphlet on the ‘Venusberg,’ which accidentally
fell into my hands.
If all that I regarded as essentially German had hitherto drawn me with
ever-increasing force, and compelled me to its eager pursuit, I here found it
suddenly presented to me in the simple outlines of a legend, based upon the
old and well-known ballad of ‘Tannhäuser.’ True, its elements were already
familiar to me from Tieck’s version in his Phantasus. But his conception of
the subject had flung me back into the fantastic regions created in my mind
at an earlier period by Hoffmann, and I should certainly never have been
tempted to extract the framework of a dramatic work from his elaborate
story. The point in this popular pamphlet which had so much weight with
me was that it brought ‘Tannhäuser,’ if only by a passing hint, into touch
with ‘The Minstrel’s War on the Wartburg.’ I had some knowledge of this
also from Hoffmann’s account in his Serapionsbrudern. But I felt that the
writer had only grasped the old legend in a distorted form, and therefore
endeavoured to gain a closer acquaintance with the true aspect of this
attractive story. At this juncture Lehrs brought me the annual report of the
proceedings of the Königsberg German Society, in which the ‘Wartburg
contest’ was criticised with a fair amount of detail by Lukas. Here I also
found the original text. Although I could utilise but little of the real setting
for my own purpose, yet the picture it gave me of Germany in the Middle
Ages was so suggestive that I found I had not previously had the smallest
conception of what it was like.
As a sequel to the Wartburg poem, I also found in the same copy a
critical study, ‘Lohengrin,’ which gave in full detail the main contents of
that widespread epic.
Page 242
Thus a whole new world was opened to me, and though as yet I had not
found the form in which I might cope with Lohengrin, yet this image also
lived imperishably within me. When, therefore, I afterwards made a close
acquaintance with the intricacies of this legend, I could visualise the figure
of the hero with a distinctness equal to that of my conception of Tannhäuser
at this time.
Under these influences my longing for a speedy return to Germany grew
ever more intense, for there I hoped to earn a new home for myself where I
could enjoy leisure for creative work. But it was not yet possible even to
think of occupying myself with such grateful tasks. The sordid necessities
of life still bound me to Paris. While thus employed, I found an opportunity
of exerting myself in a way more congenial to my desires. When I was a
young man at Prague, I had made the acquaintance of a Jewish musician
and composer called Dessauer—a man who was not devoid of talent, who
in fact achieved a certain reputation, but was chiefly known among his
intimates on account of his hypochondria. This man, who was now in
flourishing circumstances, was so far patronised by Schlesinger that the
latter seriously proposed to help him to a commission for Grand Opera.
Dessauer had come across my poem of the Fliegender Holländer, and now
insisted that I should draft a similar plot for him, as M. Leon Pillet’s
Vaisseau Fantome had already been given to M. Dietsch, the letter’s
musical conductor, to set to music. From this same conductor Dessauer
obtained the promise of a like commission, and he now offered me two
hundred francs to provide him with a similar plot, and one congenial to his
hypochondriacal temperament.
To meet this wish I ransacked my brain for recollections of Hoffmann,
and quickly decided to work up his Bergwerke von Falun. The moulding of
this fascinating and marvellous material succeeded as admirably as I could
wish. Dessauer also felt convinced that the topic was worth his while to set
to music. His dismay was accordingly all the greater when Pillet rejected
our plot on the ground that the staging would be too difficult, and that the
second act especially would entail insurmountable obstacles for the ballet,
which had to be given each time. In place of this Dessauer wished me to
compose him an oratorio on ‘Mary Magdalene.’ As on the day that he
expressed this wish he appeared to be suffering from acute melancholia, so
much so that he declared he had that morning seen his own head lying
beside his bed, I thought well not to refuse his request. I asked him,
found the form in which I might cope with Lohengrin, yet this image also
lived imperishably within me. When, therefore, I afterwards made a close
acquaintance with the intricacies of this legend, I could visualise the figure
of the hero with a distinctness equal to that of my conception of Tannhäuser
at this time.
Under these influences my longing for a speedy return to Germany grew
ever more intense, for there I hoped to earn a new home for myself where I
could enjoy leisure for creative work. But it was not yet possible even to
think of occupying myself with such grateful tasks. The sordid necessities
of life still bound me to Paris. While thus employed, I found an opportunity
of exerting myself in a way more congenial to my desires. When I was a
young man at Prague, I had made the acquaintance of a Jewish musician
and composer called Dessauer—a man who was not devoid of talent, who
in fact achieved a certain reputation, but was chiefly known among his
intimates on account of his hypochondria. This man, who was now in
flourishing circumstances, was so far patronised by Schlesinger that the
latter seriously proposed to help him to a commission for Grand Opera.
Dessauer had come across my poem of the Fliegender Holländer, and now
insisted that I should draft a similar plot for him, as M. Leon Pillet’s
Vaisseau Fantome had already been given to M. Dietsch, the letter’s
musical conductor, to set to music. From this same conductor Dessauer
obtained the promise of a like commission, and he now offered me two
hundred francs to provide him with a similar plot, and one congenial to his
hypochondriacal temperament.
To meet this wish I ransacked my brain for recollections of Hoffmann,
and quickly decided to work up his Bergwerke von Falun. The moulding of
this fascinating and marvellous material succeeded as admirably as I could
wish. Dessauer also felt convinced that the topic was worth his while to set
to music. His dismay was accordingly all the greater when Pillet rejected
our plot on the ground that the staging would be too difficult, and that the
second act especially would entail insurmountable obstacles for the ballet,
which had to be given each time. In place of this Dessauer wished me to
compose him an oratorio on ‘Mary Magdalene.’ As on the day that he
expressed this wish he appeared to be suffering from acute melancholia, so
much so that he declared he had that morning seen his own head lying
beside his bed, I thought well not to refuse his request. I asked him,
Page 243
therefore, to give me time, and I regret to say that ever since that day I have
continued to take it..
It was amid such distractions as these that this winter at length drew to an
end, while my prospects of getting to Germany gradually grew more
hopeful, though with a slowness that sorely tried my patience. I had kept up
a continuous correspondence with Dresden respecting Rienzi, and in the
worthy chorus-master Fischer I at last found an honest man who was
favourably disposed to me. He sent me reliable and reassuring reports as to
the state of my affairs.
After receiving news, early in January, 1842, of renewed delay, I at last
heard that by the end of February the work would be ready for performance.
I was seriously uneasy at this, as I was afraid of not being able to
accomplish the journey by that date. But this news also was soon
contradicted, and the honest Fischer informed me that my opera had had to
be postponed till the autumn of that year. I realised fully that it would never
be performed if I could not be present in person at Dresden. When
eventually in March Count Redern, the director of the Theatre Royal in
Berlin, told me that my Fliegender Holländer had been accepted for the
opera there, I thought I had sufficient reason to return to Germany at all
costs as soon as possible.
I had already had various experiences as to the views of German
managers on this work. Relying on the plot, which had pleased the manager
of the Paris Opera so much, I had sent the libretto in the first instance to my
old acquaintance Ringelhardt, the director of the Leipzig theatre. But the
man had cherished an undisguised aversion for me since my Liebesverbot.
As he could not this time possibly object to any levity in my subject, he
now found fault with its gloomy solemnity and refused to accept it. As I had
met Councillor Küstner, at that time manager of the Munich Court Theatre,
when he was making arrangements about La Reine de Chypre in Paris, I
now sent him the text of the Dutchman with a similar request. He, too,
returned it, with the assurance that it was not suited to German stage
conditions, or to the taste of the German public. As he had ordered a French
libretto for Munich, I knew what he meant. When the score was finished, I
sent it to Meyerbeer in Berlin, with a letter for Count Redern, and begged
him, as he had been unable to help me to anything in Paris, in spite of his
desire to do so, to be kind enough to use his influence in Berlin in favour of
continued to take it..
It was amid such distractions as these that this winter at length drew to an
end, while my prospects of getting to Germany gradually grew more
hopeful, though with a slowness that sorely tried my patience. I had kept up
a continuous correspondence with Dresden respecting Rienzi, and in the
worthy chorus-master Fischer I at last found an honest man who was
favourably disposed to me. He sent me reliable and reassuring reports as to
the state of my affairs.
After receiving news, early in January, 1842, of renewed delay, I at last
heard that by the end of February the work would be ready for performance.
I was seriously uneasy at this, as I was afraid of not being able to
accomplish the journey by that date. But this news also was soon
contradicted, and the honest Fischer informed me that my opera had had to
be postponed till the autumn of that year. I realised fully that it would never
be performed if I could not be present in person at Dresden. When
eventually in March Count Redern, the director of the Theatre Royal in
Berlin, told me that my Fliegender Holländer had been accepted for the
opera there, I thought I had sufficient reason to return to Germany at all
costs as soon as possible.
I had already had various experiences as to the views of German
managers on this work. Relying on the plot, which had pleased the manager
of the Paris Opera so much, I had sent the libretto in the first instance to my
old acquaintance Ringelhardt, the director of the Leipzig theatre. But the
man had cherished an undisguised aversion for me since my Liebesverbot.
As he could not this time possibly object to any levity in my subject, he
now found fault with its gloomy solemnity and refused to accept it. As I had
met Councillor Küstner, at that time manager of the Munich Court Theatre,
when he was making arrangements about La Reine de Chypre in Paris, I
now sent him the text of the Dutchman with a similar request. He, too,
returned it, with the assurance that it was not suited to German stage
conditions, or to the taste of the German public. As he had ordered a French
libretto for Munich, I knew what he meant. When the score was finished, I
sent it to Meyerbeer in Berlin, with a letter for Count Redern, and begged
him, as he had been unable to help me to anything in Paris, in spite of his
desire to do so, to be kind enough to use his influence in Berlin in favour of
Page 244
my composition. I was genuinely astonished at the truly prompt acceptance
of my work two months later, which was accompanied by very gratifying
assurances from the Count, and I was delighted to see in it a proof of
Meyerbeer’s sincere and energetic intervention in my favour. Strange to say,
on my return to Germany soon afterwards, I was destined to learn that
Count Redern had long since retired from the management of the Berlin
Opera House, and that Küstner of Munich had already been appointed his
successor; the upshot of this was that Count Redern’s consent, though very
courteous, could not by any means be taken seriously, as the realisation of it
depended not on him but on his successor. What the result was remains to
be seen.
A circumstance that eventually facilitated my long-desired return to
Germany, which was now justified by my good prospects, was the tardily
awakened interest taken in my position by the wealthy members of my
family. If Didot had had reasons of his own for applying to the Minister
Villemain for support for Lehrs, so also Avenarius, my brother-in-law in
Paris, when he heard how I was struggling against poverty, one day took it
into his head to surprise me with some quite unexpected help secured by his
appeal to my sister Louisa. On 26th December of the fast-waning year 1841
I went home to Minna carrying a goose under my arm, and in the beak of
the bird we found a five-hundred-franc note. This note had been given me
by Avenarius as the result of a request on my behalf made by my sister
Louisa to a friend of hers, a wealthy merchant named Schletter. This
welcome addition to our extremely straitened resources might not in itself
have been sufficient to put me in an exceedingly good-humour, had I not
clearly seen in it the prospect of escaping altogether from my position in
Paris. As the leading German managers had now consented to the
performance of two of my compositions, I thought I might seriously
reproach my brother-in-law, Friedrich Brockhaus, who had repulsed me the
year before when I applied to him in great distress, on the ground that he
‘disapproved of my profession.’ This time I might be more successful in
securing the wherewithal for my return. I was not mistaken, and when the
time came I was supplied from this source with the necessary travelling
expenses.
With these prospects, and my position thus improved, I found myself
spending the second half of the winter 1841-42 in high spirits, and affording
constant entertainment to the small circle of friends which my relationship
of my work two months later, which was accompanied by very gratifying
assurances from the Count, and I was delighted to see in it a proof of
Meyerbeer’s sincere and energetic intervention in my favour. Strange to say,
on my return to Germany soon afterwards, I was destined to learn that
Count Redern had long since retired from the management of the Berlin
Opera House, and that Küstner of Munich had already been appointed his
successor; the upshot of this was that Count Redern’s consent, though very
courteous, could not by any means be taken seriously, as the realisation of it
depended not on him but on his successor. What the result was remains to
be seen.
A circumstance that eventually facilitated my long-desired return to
Germany, which was now justified by my good prospects, was the tardily
awakened interest taken in my position by the wealthy members of my
family. If Didot had had reasons of his own for applying to the Minister
Villemain for support for Lehrs, so also Avenarius, my brother-in-law in
Paris, when he heard how I was struggling against poverty, one day took it
into his head to surprise me with some quite unexpected help secured by his
appeal to my sister Louisa. On 26th December of the fast-waning year 1841
I went home to Minna carrying a goose under my arm, and in the beak of
the bird we found a five-hundred-franc note. This note had been given me
by Avenarius as the result of a request on my behalf made by my sister
Louisa to a friend of hers, a wealthy merchant named Schletter. This
welcome addition to our extremely straitened resources might not in itself
have been sufficient to put me in an exceedingly good-humour, had I not
clearly seen in it the prospect of escaping altogether from my position in
Paris. As the leading German managers had now consented to the
performance of two of my compositions, I thought I might seriously
reproach my brother-in-law, Friedrich Brockhaus, who had repulsed me the
year before when I applied to him in great distress, on the ground that he
‘disapproved of my profession.’ This time I might be more successful in
securing the wherewithal for my return. I was not mistaken, and when the
time came I was supplied from this source with the necessary travelling
expenses.
With these prospects, and my position thus improved, I found myself
spending the second half of the winter 1841-42 in high spirits, and affording
constant entertainment to the small circle of friends which my relationship
Page 245
to Avenarius had created around me. Minna and I frequently spent our
evenings with this family and others, amongst whom I have pleasant
recollections of a certain Herr Kuhne, the head of a private school, and his
wife. I contributed so greatly to the success of their little soirees, and was
always so willing to improvise dances on the piano for them to dance to,
that I soon ran the risk of enjoying an almost burdensome popularity.
At length the hour struck for my deliverance; the day came on which, as I
devoutly hoped, I might turn my back on Paris for ever. It was the 7th of
April, and Paris was already gay with the first luxuriant buddings of spring.
In front of our windows, which all the winter had looked upon a bleak and
desolate garden, the trees were burgeoning, and the birds sang. Our emotion
at parting from our dear friends Anders, Lehrs, and Kietz, however, was
great, almost overwhelming. The first seemed already doomed to an early
death, for his health was exceedingly bad, and he was advanced in years.
About Lehrs’ condition, as I have already said, there could no longer be any
doubt, and it was dreadful, after so short an experience as the two and a half
years which I had spent in Paris, to see the ravages that want had wrought
among good, noble, and sometimes even distinguished men. Kietz, for
whose future I was concerned, less on grounds of health than of morals,
touched our hearts once more by his boundless and almost childlike good-
nature. Fancying, for instance, that I might not have enough money for the
journey, he forced me, in spite of all resistance, to accept another five-franc
piece, which was about all that remained of his own fortune at the moment:
he also stuffed a packet of good French snuff for me into the pocket of the
coach, in which we at last rumbled through the boulevards to the barriers,
which we passed but were unable to see this time, because our eyes were
blinded with tears.
evenings with this family and others, amongst whom I have pleasant
recollections of a certain Herr Kuhne, the head of a private school, and his
wife. I contributed so greatly to the success of their little soirees, and was
always so willing to improvise dances on the piano for them to dance to,
that I soon ran the risk of enjoying an almost burdensome popularity.
At length the hour struck for my deliverance; the day came on which, as I
devoutly hoped, I might turn my back on Paris for ever. It was the 7th of
April, and Paris was already gay with the first luxuriant buddings of spring.
In front of our windows, which all the winter had looked upon a bleak and
desolate garden, the trees were burgeoning, and the birds sang. Our emotion
at parting from our dear friends Anders, Lehrs, and Kietz, however, was
great, almost overwhelming. The first seemed already doomed to an early
death, for his health was exceedingly bad, and he was advanced in years.
About Lehrs’ condition, as I have already said, there could no longer be any
doubt, and it was dreadful, after so short an experience as the two and a half
years which I had spent in Paris, to see the ravages that want had wrought
among good, noble, and sometimes even distinguished men. Kietz, for
whose future I was concerned, less on grounds of health than of morals,
touched our hearts once more by his boundless and almost childlike good-
nature. Fancying, for instance, that I might not have enough money for the
journey, he forced me, in spite of all resistance, to accept another five-franc
piece, which was about all that remained of his own fortune at the moment:
he also stuffed a packet of good French snuff for me into the pocket of the
coach, in which we at last rumbled through the boulevards to the barriers,
which we passed but were unable to see this time, because our eyes were
blinded with tears.
Page 246
PART II
1842-1850
The journey from Paris to Dresden at that time took five days and nights.
On the German frontier, near Forbach, we met with stormy weather and
snow, a greeting which seemed inhospitable after the spring we had already
enjoyed in Paris. And, indeed, as we continued our journey through our
native land once more, we found much to dishearten us, and I could not
help thinking that the Frenchmen who on leaving Germany breathed more
freely on reaching French soil, and unbuttoned their coats, as though
passing from winter into summer, were not so very foolish after all, seeing
that we, for our part, were now compelled to seek protection against this
conspicuous change of temperature by being very careful to put on
sufficient clothing. The unkindness of the elements became perfect torture
when, later on, between Frankfort and Leipzig, we were swept into the
stream of visitors to the Great Easter Fair.
The pressure on the mail-coaches was so great, that for two days and a
night, amid ceaseless storm, snow and rain, we were continually changing
from one wretched ‘substitute’ to another, thus turning our journey into an
adventure of almost the same type as our former voyage at sea.
One solitary flash of brightness was afforded by our view of the
Wartburg, which we passed during the only sunlit hour of this journey. The
sight of this mountain fastness, which, from the Fulda side, is clearly visible
for a long time, affected me deeply. A neighbouring ridge further on I at
once christened the Horselberg, and as we drove through the valley,
pictured to myself the scenery for the third act of my Tannhäuser. This
scene remained so vividly in my mind, that long afterwards I was able to
give Desplechin, the Parisian scene-painter, exact details when he was
working out the scenery under my direction. If I had already been
impressed by the significance of the fact that my first journey through the
1842-1850
The journey from Paris to Dresden at that time took five days and nights.
On the German frontier, near Forbach, we met with stormy weather and
snow, a greeting which seemed inhospitable after the spring we had already
enjoyed in Paris. And, indeed, as we continued our journey through our
native land once more, we found much to dishearten us, and I could not
help thinking that the Frenchmen who on leaving Germany breathed more
freely on reaching French soil, and unbuttoned their coats, as though
passing from winter into summer, were not so very foolish after all, seeing
that we, for our part, were now compelled to seek protection against this
conspicuous change of temperature by being very careful to put on
sufficient clothing. The unkindness of the elements became perfect torture
when, later on, between Frankfort and Leipzig, we were swept into the
stream of visitors to the Great Easter Fair.
The pressure on the mail-coaches was so great, that for two days and a
night, amid ceaseless storm, snow and rain, we were continually changing
from one wretched ‘substitute’ to another, thus turning our journey into an
adventure of almost the same type as our former voyage at sea.
One solitary flash of brightness was afforded by our view of the
Wartburg, which we passed during the only sunlit hour of this journey. The
sight of this mountain fastness, which, from the Fulda side, is clearly visible
for a long time, affected me deeply. A neighbouring ridge further on I at
once christened the Horselberg, and as we drove through the valley,
pictured to myself the scenery for the third act of my Tannhäuser. This
scene remained so vividly in my mind, that long afterwards I was able to
give Desplechin, the Parisian scene-painter, exact details when he was
working out the scenery under my direction. If I had already been
impressed by the significance of the fact that my first journey through the
Page 247
German Rhine district, so famous in legend, should have been made on my
way home from Paris, it seemed an even more ominous coincidence that my
first sight of Wartburg, which was so rich in historical and mythical
associations, should come just at this moment. The view so warmed my
heart against wind and weather, Jews and the Leipzig Fair, that in the end I
arrived, on 12th April, 1842, safe and sound, with my poor, battered, half-
frozen wife, in that selfsame city of Dresden which I had last seen on the
occasion of my sad separation from my Minna, and my departure for my
northern place of exile.
We put up at the ‘Stadt Gotha’ inn. The city, in which such momentous
years of my childhood and boyhood had been spent, seemed cold and dead
beneath the influences of the wild, gloomy weather. Indeed, everything
there that could remind me of my youth seemed dead. No hospitable house
received us. We found my wife’s parents living in cramped and dingy
lodgings in very straitened circumstances, and were obliged at once to look
about for a small abode for ourselves. This we found in the Topfergasse for
twenty-one marks a month. After paying the necessary business visits in
connection with Rienzi, and making arrangements for Minna during my
brief absence, I set out on 15th April direct for Leipzig, where I saw my
mother and family for the first time in six years.
During this period, which had been so eventful for my own life, my
mother had undergone a great change in her domestic position through the
death of Rosalie. She was living in a pleasant roomy flat near the
Brockhaus family, where she was free from all those household cares to
which, owing to her large family, she had devoted so many years of anxious
thought. Her bustling energy, which had almost amounted to hardness, had
entirely given place to a natural cheerfulness and interest in the family
prosperity of her married daughters. For the blissful calm of this happy old
age she was mainly indebted to the affectionate care of her son-in-law,
Friedrich Brockhaus, to whom I expressed my heartfelt thanks for his
goodness. She was exceedingly astonished and pleased to see me
unexpectedly enter her room. Any bitterness that ever existed between us
had utterly vanished, and her only complaint was that she could not put me
up in her house, instead of my brother Julius, the unfortunate goldsmith,
who had none of the qualities that could make him a suitable companion for
her. She was full of hope for the success of my undertaking, and felt this
way home from Paris, it seemed an even more ominous coincidence that my
first sight of Wartburg, which was so rich in historical and mythical
associations, should come just at this moment. The view so warmed my
heart against wind and weather, Jews and the Leipzig Fair, that in the end I
arrived, on 12th April, 1842, safe and sound, with my poor, battered, half-
frozen wife, in that selfsame city of Dresden which I had last seen on the
occasion of my sad separation from my Minna, and my departure for my
northern place of exile.
We put up at the ‘Stadt Gotha’ inn. The city, in which such momentous
years of my childhood and boyhood had been spent, seemed cold and dead
beneath the influences of the wild, gloomy weather. Indeed, everything
there that could remind me of my youth seemed dead. No hospitable house
received us. We found my wife’s parents living in cramped and dingy
lodgings in very straitened circumstances, and were obliged at once to look
about for a small abode for ourselves. This we found in the Topfergasse for
twenty-one marks a month. After paying the necessary business visits in
connection with Rienzi, and making arrangements for Minna during my
brief absence, I set out on 15th April direct for Leipzig, where I saw my
mother and family for the first time in six years.
During this period, which had been so eventful for my own life, my
mother had undergone a great change in her domestic position through the
death of Rosalie. She was living in a pleasant roomy flat near the
Brockhaus family, where she was free from all those household cares to
which, owing to her large family, she had devoted so many years of anxious
thought. Her bustling energy, which had almost amounted to hardness, had
entirely given place to a natural cheerfulness and interest in the family
prosperity of her married daughters. For the blissful calm of this happy old
age she was mainly indebted to the affectionate care of her son-in-law,
Friedrich Brockhaus, to whom I expressed my heartfelt thanks for his
goodness. She was exceedingly astonished and pleased to see me
unexpectedly enter her room. Any bitterness that ever existed between us
had utterly vanished, and her only complaint was that she could not put me
up in her house, instead of my brother Julius, the unfortunate goldsmith,
who had none of the qualities that could make him a suitable companion for
her. She was full of hope for the success of my undertaking, and felt this
Page 248
confidence strengthened by the favourable prophecy which our dear Rosalie
had made about me shortly before her sad death.
For the present, however, I only stayed a few days in Leipzig, as I had
first to visit Berlin in order to make definite arrangements with Count
Redern for the performance of the Fliegender Holländer. As I have already
observed, I was here at once destined to learn that the Count was on the
point of retiring from the directorship, and he accordingly referred me for
all further decisions to the new director, Küstner, who had not yet arrived in
Berlin. I now suddenly realised what this strange circumstance meant, and
knew that, so far as the Berlin negotiations went, I might as well have
remained in Paris. This impression was in the main confirmed by a visit to
Meyerbeer, who, I found, regarded my coming to Berlin as over hasty.
Nevertheless, he behaved in a kind and friendly manner, only regretting that
he was just on the point of ‘going away,’ a state in which I always found
him whenever I visited him again in Berlin.
Mendelssohn was also in the capital about this time, having been
appointed one of the General Musical Directors to the King of Prussia. I
also sought him out, having been previously introduced to him in Leipzig.
He informed me that he did not believe his work would prosper in Berlin,
and that he would rather go back to Leipzig. I made no inquiry about the
fate of the score of my great symphony performed at Leipzig in earlier
days, which I had more or less forced upon him so many years ago. On the
other hand, he did not betray to me any signs of remembering that strange
offering. In the midst of the lavish comforts of his home he struck me as
cold, yet it was not so much that he repelled me as that I recoiled from him.
I also paid a visit to Rellstab, to whom I had a letter of introduction from his
trusty publisher, my brother-in-law Brockhaus. Here it was not so much
smug ease that I encountered; I doubtless felt repulsed more by the fact that
he showed no inclination whatever to interest himself in my affairs.
I grew very low spirited in Berlin. I could almost have wished
Commissioner Cerf back again. Miserable as had been the time I had spent
here years before, I had then, at any rate, met one man, who, for all the
bluntness of his exterior, had treated me with true friendliness and
consideration. In vain did I try to call to mind the Berlin through whose
streets I had walked, with all the ardour of youth, by the side of Laube.
After my acquaintance with London, and still more with Paris, this city,
had made about me shortly before her sad death.
For the present, however, I only stayed a few days in Leipzig, as I had
first to visit Berlin in order to make definite arrangements with Count
Redern for the performance of the Fliegender Holländer. As I have already
observed, I was here at once destined to learn that the Count was on the
point of retiring from the directorship, and he accordingly referred me for
all further decisions to the new director, Küstner, who had not yet arrived in
Berlin. I now suddenly realised what this strange circumstance meant, and
knew that, so far as the Berlin negotiations went, I might as well have
remained in Paris. This impression was in the main confirmed by a visit to
Meyerbeer, who, I found, regarded my coming to Berlin as over hasty.
Nevertheless, he behaved in a kind and friendly manner, only regretting that
he was just on the point of ‘going away,’ a state in which I always found
him whenever I visited him again in Berlin.
Mendelssohn was also in the capital about this time, having been
appointed one of the General Musical Directors to the King of Prussia. I
also sought him out, having been previously introduced to him in Leipzig.
He informed me that he did not believe his work would prosper in Berlin,
and that he would rather go back to Leipzig. I made no inquiry about the
fate of the score of my great symphony performed at Leipzig in earlier
days, which I had more or less forced upon him so many years ago. On the
other hand, he did not betray to me any signs of remembering that strange
offering. In the midst of the lavish comforts of his home he struck me as
cold, yet it was not so much that he repelled me as that I recoiled from him.
I also paid a visit to Rellstab, to whom I had a letter of introduction from his
trusty publisher, my brother-in-law Brockhaus. Here it was not so much
smug ease that I encountered; I doubtless felt repulsed more by the fact that
he showed no inclination whatever to interest himself in my affairs.
I grew very low spirited in Berlin. I could almost have wished
Commissioner Cerf back again. Miserable as had been the time I had spent
here years before, I had then, at any rate, met one man, who, for all the
bluntness of his exterior, had treated me with true friendliness and
consideration. In vain did I try to call to mind the Berlin through whose
streets I had walked, with all the ardour of youth, by the side of Laube.
After my acquaintance with London, and still more with Paris, this city,
Page 249
with its sordid spaces and pretensions to greatness, depressed me deeply,
and I breathed a hope that, should no luck crown my life, it might at least be
spent in Paris rather than in Berlin.
On my return from this wholly fruitless expedition, I first went to Leipzig
for a few days, where, on this occasion, I stayed with my brother-in-law,
Hermann Brockhaus, who was now Professor of Oriental Languages at the
University. His family had been increased by the birth of two daughters,
and the atmosphere of unruffled content, illuminated by mental activity and
a quiet but vivid interest in all things relating to the higher aspects of life,
greatly moved my homeless and vagabond soul. One evening, after my
sister had seen to her children, whom she had brought up very well, and had
sent them with gentle words to bed, we gathered in the large richly stocked
library for our evening meal and a long confidential chat. Here I broke out
into a violent fit of weeping, and it seemed as though the tender sister, who
five years before had known me during the bitterest straits of my early
married life in Dresden, now really understood me. At the express
suggestion of my brother-in-law Hermann, my family tendered me a loan,
to help me to tide over the time of waiting for the performance of my Rienzi
in Dresden. This, they said, they regarded merely as a duty, and assured me
that I need have no hesitation whatever in accepting it. It consisted of a sum
of six hundred marks, which was to be paid me in monthly instalments for
six months. As I had no prospect of being able to reply on any other source
of income, there was every chance of Minna’s talent for management being
put severely to the test, if this were to carry us through; it could be done,
however, and I was able to return to Dresden with a great sense of relief.
While I was staying with my relatives I played and sang them the
Fliegender Holländer for the first time connectedly, and seemed to arouse
considerable interest by my performance, for when, later on, my sister
Louisa heard the opera in Dresden, she complained that much of the effect
previously produced by my rendering did not come back to her. I also
sought out my old friend Apel again. The poor man had gone stone blind,
but he astonished me by his cheeriness and contentment, and thereby once
and for all deprived me of any reason for pitying him. As he declared that
he knew the blue coat I was wearing very well, though it was really a brown
one, I thought it best not to argue the point, and I left Leipzig in a state of
wonder at finding every one there so happy and contented.
and I breathed a hope that, should no luck crown my life, it might at least be
spent in Paris rather than in Berlin.
On my return from this wholly fruitless expedition, I first went to Leipzig
for a few days, where, on this occasion, I stayed with my brother-in-law,
Hermann Brockhaus, who was now Professor of Oriental Languages at the
University. His family had been increased by the birth of two daughters,
and the atmosphere of unruffled content, illuminated by mental activity and
a quiet but vivid interest in all things relating to the higher aspects of life,
greatly moved my homeless and vagabond soul. One evening, after my
sister had seen to her children, whom she had brought up very well, and had
sent them with gentle words to bed, we gathered in the large richly stocked
library for our evening meal and a long confidential chat. Here I broke out
into a violent fit of weeping, and it seemed as though the tender sister, who
five years before had known me during the bitterest straits of my early
married life in Dresden, now really understood me. At the express
suggestion of my brother-in-law Hermann, my family tendered me a loan,
to help me to tide over the time of waiting for the performance of my Rienzi
in Dresden. This, they said, they regarded merely as a duty, and assured me
that I need have no hesitation whatever in accepting it. It consisted of a sum
of six hundred marks, which was to be paid me in monthly instalments for
six months. As I had no prospect of being able to reply on any other source
of income, there was every chance of Minna’s talent for management being
put severely to the test, if this were to carry us through; it could be done,
however, and I was able to return to Dresden with a great sense of relief.
While I was staying with my relatives I played and sang them the
Fliegender Holländer for the first time connectedly, and seemed to arouse
considerable interest by my performance, for when, later on, my sister
Louisa heard the opera in Dresden, she complained that much of the effect
previously produced by my rendering did not come back to her. I also
sought out my old friend Apel again. The poor man had gone stone blind,
but he astonished me by his cheeriness and contentment, and thereby once
and for all deprived me of any reason for pitying him. As he declared that
he knew the blue coat I was wearing very well, though it was really a brown
one, I thought it best not to argue the point, and I left Leipzig in a state of
wonder at finding every one there so happy and contented.
Page 250
When I reached Dresden, on 26th April, I found occasion to grapple more
vigorously with my lot. Here I was enlivened by closer intercourse with the
people on whom I had to rely for a successful production of Rienzi. It is
true that the results of my interviews with Lüttichau, the general manager,
and Reissiger, the musical conductor, left me cold and incredulous. Both
were sincerely astonished at my arrival in Dresden; and the same might
even be said of my frequent correspondent and patron, Hofrath Winkler,
who also would have preferred my remaining in Paris. But, as has been my
constant experience both before and since, help and encouragement have
always come to me from humbler and never from the more exalted ranks of
life.
So in this case, too, I met my first agreeable sensation in the
overwhelmingly cordial reception I received from the old chorus-master,
Wilhelm Fischer. I had had no previous acquaintance with him, yet he was
the only person who had taken the trouble to read my score carefully, and
had not only conceived serious hopes for the success of my opera, but had
worked energetically to secure its being accepted and practised. The
moment I entered his room and told him my name, he rushed to embrace
me with a loud cry, and in a second I was translated to an atmosphere of
hope. Besides this man, I met in the actor Ferdinand Heine and his family
another sure foundation for hearty and, indeed, deep-rooted friendship. It is
true that I had known him from childhood, for at that time he was one of the
few young people whom my stepfather Geyer liked to see about him. In
addition to a fairly decided talent for drawing, it was chiefly his pleasant
social gifts that had won him an entrance into our more intimate family
circle. As he was very small and slight, my stepfather nicknamed him
DavidCHEN, and under this appellation he used to take part with great
affability and good-humour in our little festivities, and above all in our
friendly excursions into the neighbouring country, in which, as I mentioned
in its place, even Carl Maria von Weber used to join. Belonging to the good
old school, he had become a useful, if not prominent, member of the
Dresden stage. He possessed all the knowledge and qualities for a good
stage manager, but never succeeded in inducing the committee to give him
that appointment. It was only as a designer of costumes that he found
further scope for his talents, and in this capacity he was included in the
consultations over the staging of Rienzi.
vigorously with my lot. Here I was enlivened by closer intercourse with the
people on whom I had to rely for a successful production of Rienzi. It is
true that the results of my interviews with Lüttichau, the general manager,
and Reissiger, the musical conductor, left me cold and incredulous. Both
were sincerely astonished at my arrival in Dresden; and the same might
even be said of my frequent correspondent and patron, Hofrath Winkler,
who also would have preferred my remaining in Paris. But, as has been my
constant experience both before and since, help and encouragement have
always come to me from humbler and never from the more exalted ranks of
life.
So in this case, too, I met my first agreeable sensation in the
overwhelmingly cordial reception I received from the old chorus-master,
Wilhelm Fischer. I had had no previous acquaintance with him, yet he was
the only person who had taken the trouble to read my score carefully, and
had not only conceived serious hopes for the success of my opera, but had
worked energetically to secure its being accepted and practised. The
moment I entered his room and told him my name, he rushed to embrace
me with a loud cry, and in a second I was translated to an atmosphere of
hope. Besides this man, I met in the actor Ferdinand Heine and his family
another sure foundation for hearty and, indeed, deep-rooted friendship. It is
true that I had known him from childhood, for at that time he was one of the
few young people whom my stepfather Geyer liked to see about him. In
addition to a fairly decided talent for drawing, it was chiefly his pleasant
social gifts that had won him an entrance into our more intimate family
circle. As he was very small and slight, my stepfather nicknamed him
DavidCHEN, and under this appellation he used to take part with great
affability and good-humour in our little festivities, and above all in our
friendly excursions into the neighbouring country, in which, as I mentioned
in its place, even Carl Maria von Weber used to join. Belonging to the good
old school, he had become a useful, if not prominent, member of the
Dresden stage. He possessed all the knowledge and qualities for a good
stage manager, but never succeeded in inducing the committee to give him
that appointment. It was only as a designer of costumes that he found
further scope for his talents, and in this capacity he was included in the
consultations over the staging of Rienzi.
Page 251
Thus it came about that he had the opportunity of busying himself with
the work of a member, now grown to man’s estate, of the very family with
whom he had spent such pleasant days in his youth. He greeted me at once
as a child of the house, and we two homeless creatures found in our
memories of this long-lost home the first common basis to our friendship.
We generally spent our evenings with old Fischer at Heine’s, where, amid
hopeful conversation, we regaled ourselves on potatoes and herrings, of
which the meal chiefly consisted. Schroder-Devrient was away on a
holiday; Tichatschek, who was also on the point of going away, I had just
time to see, and with him I went quickly through a part of his role in Rienzi.
His brisk and lively nature, his glorious voice and great musical talent, gave
special weight to his encouraging assurance that he delighted in the role of
Rienzi. Heine also told me that the mere prospect of having many new
costumes, and especially new silver armour, had inspired Tichatschek with
the liveliest desire to play this part, so that I might rely on him under any
circumstances. Thus I could at once give closer attention to the preparations
for practice, which was fixed to begin in the late summer, after the principal
singers had returned from their holiday.
I had to make special efforts to pacify my friend Fischer by my readiness
to abbreviate the score, which was excessively lengthy. His intentions in the
matter were so honest that I gladly sat down with him to the wearisome
task. I played and sang my score to the astonished man on an old grand
piano in the rehearsing-room of the Court Theatre, with such frantic vigour
that, although he did not mind if the instrument came to grief, he grew
concerned about my chest. Finally, amid hearty laughter, he ceased to argue
about cutting down passages, as precisely where he thought something
might be omitted I proved to him with headlong eloquence that it was
precisely here that the main point lay. He plunged with me head over heels
into the vast chaos of sound, against which he could raise no objection,
beyond the testimony of his watch, whose correctness I also ended by
disputing. As sops I light-heartedly flung him the big pantomime and most
of the ballet in the second act, whereby I reckoned we might save a whole
half-hour. Thus, thank goodness, the whole monster was at last handed over
to the clerks to make a fair copy of, and the rest was left for time to
accomplish.
We next discussed what we should do in the summer, and I decided upon
a stay of several months at Toplitz, the scene of my first youthful flights,
the work of a member, now grown to man’s estate, of the very family with
whom he had spent such pleasant days in his youth. He greeted me at once
as a child of the house, and we two homeless creatures found in our
memories of this long-lost home the first common basis to our friendship.
We generally spent our evenings with old Fischer at Heine’s, where, amid
hopeful conversation, we regaled ourselves on potatoes and herrings, of
which the meal chiefly consisted. Schroder-Devrient was away on a
holiday; Tichatschek, who was also on the point of going away, I had just
time to see, and with him I went quickly through a part of his role in Rienzi.
His brisk and lively nature, his glorious voice and great musical talent, gave
special weight to his encouraging assurance that he delighted in the role of
Rienzi. Heine also told me that the mere prospect of having many new
costumes, and especially new silver armour, had inspired Tichatschek with
the liveliest desire to play this part, so that I might rely on him under any
circumstances. Thus I could at once give closer attention to the preparations
for practice, which was fixed to begin in the late summer, after the principal
singers had returned from their holiday.
I had to make special efforts to pacify my friend Fischer by my readiness
to abbreviate the score, which was excessively lengthy. His intentions in the
matter were so honest that I gladly sat down with him to the wearisome
task. I played and sang my score to the astonished man on an old grand
piano in the rehearsing-room of the Court Theatre, with such frantic vigour
that, although he did not mind if the instrument came to grief, he grew
concerned about my chest. Finally, amid hearty laughter, he ceased to argue
about cutting down passages, as precisely where he thought something
might be omitted I proved to him with headlong eloquence that it was
precisely here that the main point lay. He plunged with me head over heels
into the vast chaos of sound, against which he could raise no objection,
beyond the testimony of his watch, whose correctness I also ended by
disputing. As sops I light-heartedly flung him the big pantomime and most
of the ballet in the second act, whereby I reckoned we might save a whole
half-hour. Thus, thank goodness, the whole monster was at last handed over
to the clerks to make a fair copy of, and the rest was left for time to
accomplish.
We next discussed what we should do in the summer, and I decided upon
a stay of several months at Toplitz, the scene of my first youthful flights,
Page 252
whose fine air and baths, I hoped, would also benefit Minna’s health. But
before we could carry out this intention I had to pay several more visits to
Leipzig to settle the fate of my Dutchman. On 5th May I proceeded thither
to have an interview with Küstner, the new director of the Berlin Opera,
who I had been told had just arrived there. He was now placed in the
awkward position of being about to produce in Berlin the very opera which
he had before declined in Munich, as it had been accepted by his
predecessor in office. He promised me to consider what steps he would take
in this predicament. In order to learn the result of Küstner’s deliberations, I
determined, on 2nd June, to seek him out, and this time in Berlin itself. But
at Leipzig I found a letter in which he begged me to wait patiently a little
longer for his final verdict. I took advantage of being in the neighbourhood
of Halle to pay a visit to my eldest brother Albert. I was very much grieved
and depressed to find the poor fellow, whom I must give the credit of
having the greatest perseverance and a quite remarkable talent for dramatic
song, living in the unworthy and mean circumstances which the Halle
Theatre offered to him and his family. The realisation of conditions into
which I myself had once nearly sunk now filled me with indescribable
abhorrence. Still more harrowing was it to hear my brother speak of this
state in tones which showed, alas, only too plainly, the hopeless submission
with which he had already resigned himself to its horrors. The only
consolation I could find was the personality and childlike nature of his step-
daughter Johanna, who was then fifteen, and who sang me Spohr’s Rose,
wie bist du so schon with great expression and in a voice of an
extraordinarily beautiful quality.
Then I returned to Dresden, and at last, in wonderful weather, undertook
the pleasant journey to Toplitz with Minna and one of her sisters, reaching
that place on 9th June, where we took up our quarters at a second-class inn,
the Eiche, at Schonau. Here we were soon joined by my mother, who paid
her usual yearly visit to the warm baths all the more gladly this time
because she knew she would find me there. If she had before had any
prejudice against Minna because of my premature marriage to her, a closer
acquaintance with her domestic gifts soon changed it into respect, and she
quickly learned to love the partner of my doleful days in Paris. Although
my mother’s vagaries demanded no small consideration, yet what
particularly delighted me about her was the astonishing vivacity of her
almost childlike imagination, a faculty she retained to such a degree that
before we could carry out this intention I had to pay several more visits to
Leipzig to settle the fate of my Dutchman. On 5th May I proceeded thither
to have an interview with Küstner, the new director of the Berlin Opera,
who I had been told had just arrived there. He was now placed in the
awkward position of being about to produce in Berlin the very opera which
he had before declined in Munich, as it had been accepted by his
predecessor in office. He promised me to consider what steps he would take
in this predicament. In order to learn the result of Küstner’s deliberations, I
determined, on 2nd June, to seek him out, and this time in Berlin itself. But
at Leipzig I found a letter in which he begged me to wait patiently a little
longer for his final verdict. I took advantage of being in the neighbourhood
of Halle to pay a visit to my eldest brother Albert. I was very much grieved
and depressed to find the poor fellow, whom I must give the credit of
having the greatest perseverance and a quite remarkable talent for dramatic
song, living in the unworthy and mean circumstances which the Halle
Theatre offered to him and his family. The realisation of conditions into
which I myself had once nearly sunk now filled me with indescribable
abhorrence. Still more harrowing was it to hear my brother speak of this
state in tones which showed, alas, only too plainly, the hopeless submission
with which he had already resigned himself to its horrors. The only
consolation I could find was the personality and childlike nature of his step-
daughter Johanna, who was then fifteen, and who sang me Spohr’s Rose,
wie bist du so schon with great expression and in a voice of an
extraordinarily beautiful quality.
Then I returned to Dresden, and at last, in wonderful weather, undertook
the pleasant journey to Toplitz with Minna and one of her sisters, reaching
that place on 9th June, where we took up our quarters at a second-class inn,
the Eiche, at Schonau. Here we were soon joined by my mother, who paid
her usual yearly visit to the warm baths all the more gladly this time
because she knew she would find me there. If she had before had any
prejudice against Minna because of my premature marriage to her, a closer
acquaintance with her domestic gifts soon changed it into respect, and she
quickly learned to love the partner of my doleful days in Paris. Although
my mother’s vagaries demanded no small consideration, yet what
particularly delighted me about her was the astonishing vivacity of her
almost childlike imagination, a faculty she retained to such a degree that
Page 253
one morning she complained that my relation of the Tannhäuser legend on
the previous evening had given her a whole night of pleasant but most tiring
sleeplessness.
By dint of appealing letters to Schletter, a wealthy patron of art in
Leipzig, I managed to do something for Kietz, who, had remained behind in
misery in Paris, and also to provide Minna with medical treatment. I also
succeeded to a certain extent in ameliorating my own woeful financial
position. Scarcely were these tasks accomplished, when I started off in my
old boyish way on a ramble of several days on foot through the Bohemian
mountains, in order that I might mentally work out my plan of the
‘Venusberg’ amid the pleasant associations of such a trip. Here I took the
fancy of engaging quarters in Aussig on the romantic Schreckenstein, where
for several days I occupied the little public room, in which straw was laid
down for me to sleep on at night. I found recreation in daily ascents of the
Wostrai, the highest peak in the neighbourhood, and so keenly did the
fantastic solitude quicken my youthful spirit, that I clambered about the
ruins of the Schreckenstein the whole of one moonlit night, wrapped only in
a blanket, in order myself to provide the ghost that was lacking, and
delighted myself with the hope of scaring some passing wayfarer.
Here I drew up in my pocket-book the detailed plan of a three-act opera
on the ‘Venusberg,’ and subsequently carried out the composition of this
work in strict accordance with the sketch I then made.
One day, when climbing the Wostrai, I was astonished, on turning the
corner of a valley, to hear a merry dance tune whistled by a goatherd
perched up on a crag. I seemed immediately to stand among the chorus of
pilgrims filing past the goatherd in the valley; but I could not afterwards
recall the goatherd’s tune, so I was obliged to help myself out of the matter
in the usual way.
Enriched by these spoils, I returned to Toplitz in a wonderfully cheerful
frame of mind and robust health, but on receiving the interesting news that
Tichatschek and Schroder-Devrient were on the point of returning, I was
impelled to set off once more for Dresden. I took this step, not so much to
avoid missing any of the early rehearsals of Rienzi, as because I wanted to
prevent the management replacing it by something else. I left Minna for a
time with my mother, and reached Dresden on 18th July.
the previous evening had given her a whole night of pleasant but most tiring
sleeplessness.
By dint of appealing letters to Schletter, a wealthy patron of art in
Leipzig, I managed to do something for Kietz, who, had remained behind in
misery in Paris, and also to provide Minna with medical treatment. I also
succeeded to a certain extent in ameliorating my own woeful financial
position. Scarcely were these tasks accomplished, when I started off in my
old boyish way on a ramble of several days on foot through the Bohemian
mountains, in order that I might mentally work out my plan of the
‘Venusberg’ amid the pleasant associations of such a trip. Here I took the
fancy of engaging quarters in Aussig on the romantic Schreckenstein, where
for several days I occupied the little public room, in which straw was laid
down for me to sleep on at night. I found recreation in daily ascents of the
Wostrai, the highest peak in the neighbourhood, and so keenly did the
fantastic solitude quicken my youthful spirit, that I clambered about the
ruins of the Schreckenstein the whole of one moonlit night, wrapped only in
a blanket, in order myself to provide the ghost that was lacking, and
delighted myself with the hope of scaring some passing wayfarer.
Here I drew up in my pocket-book the detailed plan of a three-act opera
on the ‘Venusberg,’ and subsequently carried out the composition of this
work in strict accordance with the sketch I then made.
One day, when climbing the Wostrai, I was astonished, on turning the
corner of a valley, to hear a merry dance tune whistled by a goatherd
perched up on a crag. I seemed immediately to stand among the chorus of
pilgrims filing past the goatherd in the valley; but I could not afterwards
recall the goatherd’s tune, so I was obliged to help myself out of the matter
in the usual way.
Enriched by these spoils, I returned to Toplitz in a wonderfully cheerful
frame of mind and robust health, but on receiving the interesting news that
Tichatschek and Schroder-Devrient were on the point of returning, I was
impelled to set off once more for Dresden. I took this step, not so much to
avoid missing any of the early rehearsals of Rienzi, as because I wanted to
prevent the management replacing it by something else. I left Minna for a
time with my mother, and reached Dresden on 18th July.
Page 254
I hired a small lodging in a queer house, since pulled down, facing the
Maximilian Avenue, and entered into a fairly lively intercourse with our
operatic stars who had just returned. My old enthusiasm for Schroder-
Devrient revived when I saw her again more frequently in opera. Strange
was the effect produced upon me when I heard her for the first time in
Gretry’s Blaubart, for I could not help remembering that this was the first
opera I had ever seen. I had been taken to it as a boy of five (also in
Dresden), and I still retained my wondrous first impressions of it. All my
earliest childish memories were revived, and I recollected how frequently
and with what emphasis I had myself sung Bluebeard’s song: Ha, die
Falsche! Die Thure offen! to the amusement of the whole house, with a
paper helmet of my own making on my head. My friend Heine still
remembered it well.
In other respects the operatic performances were not such as to impress
me very favourably: I particularly missed the rolling sound of the fully
equipped Parisian orchestra of string instruments. I also noticed that, when
opening the fine new theatre, they had quite forgotten to increase the
number of these instruments in proportion to the enlarged space. In this, as
well as in the general equipment of the stage, which was materially
deficient in many respects, I was impressed by the sense of a certain
meanness about theatrical enterprise in Germany, which became most
noticeable when reproductions were given, often with wretched translations
of the text, of the Paris opera repertoire. If even in Paris my dissatisfaction
with this treatment of opera had been great, the feeling which once drove
me thither from the German theatres now returned with redoubled energy. I
actually felt degraded again, and nourished within my breast a contempt so
deep that for a time I could hardly endure the thought of signing a lasting
contract, even with one of the most up-to-date of German opera houses, but
sadly wondered what steps I could take to hold my ground between disgust
and desire in this strange world.
Nothing but the sympathy inspired by communion with persons endowed
with exceptional gifts enabled me to triumph over my scruples. This
statement applies above all to my great ideal, Schroder-Devrient, in whose
artistic triumphs it had once been my most burning desire to be associated.
It is true that many years had elapsed since my first youthful impressions of
her were formed. As regards her looks, the verdict which, in the following
winter, was sent to Paris by Berlioz during his stay in Dresden, was so far
Maximilian Avenue, and entered into a fairly lively intercourse with our
operatic stars who had just returned. My old enthusiasm for Schroder-
Devrient revived when I saw her again more frequently in opera. Strange
was the effect produced upon me when I heard her for the first time in
Gretry’s Blaubart, for I could not help remembering that this was the first
opera I had ever seen. I had been taken to it as a boy of five (also in
Dresden), and I still retained my wondrous first impressions of it. All my
earliest childish memories were revived, and I recollected how frequently
and with what emphasis I had myself sung Bluebeard’s song: Ha, die
Falsche! Die Thure offen! to the amusement of the whole house, with a
paper helmet of my own making on my head. My friend Heine still
remembered it well.
In other respects the operatic performances were not such as to impress
me very favourably: I particularly missed the rolling sound of the fully
equipped Parisian orchestra of string instruments. I also noticed that, when
opening the fine new theatre, they had quite forgotten to increase the
number of these instruments in proportion to the enlarged space. In this, as
well as in the general equipment of the stage, which was materially
deficient in many respects, I was impressed by the sense of a certain
meanness about theatrical enterprise in Germany, which became most
noticeable when reproductions were given, often with wretched translations
of the text, of the Paris opera repertoire. If even in Paris my dissatisfaction
with this treatment of opera had been great, the feeling which once drove
me thither from the German theatres now returned with redoubled energy. I
actually felt degraded again, and nourished within my breast a contempt so
deep that for a time I could hardly endure the thought of signing a lasting
contract, even with one of the most up-to-date of German opera houses, but
sadly wondered what steps I could take to hold my ground between disgust
and desire in this strange world.
Nothing but the sympathy inspired by communion with persons endowed
with exceptional gifts enabled me to triumph over my scruples. This
statement applies above all to my great ideal, Schroder-Devrient, in whose
artistic triumphs it had once been my most burning desire to be associated.
It is true that many years had elapsed since my first youthful impressions of
her were formed. As regards her looks, the verdict which, in the following
winter, was sent to Paris by Berlioz during his stay in Dresden, was so far
Page 255
correct that her somewhat ‘maternal’ stoutness was unsuited to youthful
parts, especially in male attire, which, as in Rienzi, made too great a
demand upon the imagination. Her voice, which in point of quality had
never been an exceptionally good medium for song, often landed her in
difficulties, and in particular she was forced, when singing, to drag the time
a little all through. But her achievements were less hampered now by these
material hindrances than by the fact that her repertoire consisted of a
limited number of leading parts, which she had sung so frequently that a
certain monotony in the conscious calculation of effect often developed into
a mannerism which, from her tendency to exaggeration, was at times almost
painful.
Although these defects could not escape me, yet I, more than any one,
was especially qualified to overlook such minor weaknesses, and realise
with enthusiasm the incomparable greatness of her performances. Indeed, it
only needed the stimulus of excitement, which this actress’s exceptionally
eventful life still procured, fully to restore the creative power of her prime,
a fact of which I was subsequently to receive striking demonstrations. But I
was seriously troubled and depressed at seeing how strong was the
disintegrating effect of theatrical life upon the character of this singer, who
had originally been endowed with such great and noble qualities. From the
very mouth through which the great actress’s inspired musical utterances
reached me, I was compelled to hear at other times very similar language to
that in which, with but few exceptions, nearly all heroines of the stage
indulge. The possession of a naturally fine voice, or even mere physical
advantages, which might place her rivals on the same footing as herself in
public favour, was more than she could endure; and so far was she from
acquiring the dignified resignation worthy of a great artist, that her jealousy
increased to a painful extent as years went on. I noticed this all the more
because I had reason to suffer from it. A fact which caused me even greater
trouble, however, was that she did not grasp music easily, and the study of a
new part involved difficulties which meant many a painful hour for the
composer who had to make her master his work. Her difficulty in learning
new parts, and particularly that of Adriano in Rienzi, entailed
disappointments for her which caused me a good deal of trouble.
If, in her case, I had to handle a great and sensitive nature very tenderly, I
had, on the other hand, a very easy task with Tichatschek, with his childish
limitations and superficial, but exceptionally brilliant, talents. He did not
parts, especially in male attire, which, as in Rienzi, made too great a
demand upon the imagination. Her voice, which in point of quality had
never been an exceptionally good medium for song, often landed her in
difficulties, and in particular she was forced, when singing, to drag the time
a little all through. But her achievements were less hampered now by these
material hindrances than by the fact that her repertoire consisted of a
limited number of leading parts, which she had sung so frequently that a
certain monotony in the conscious calculation of effect often developed into
a mannerism which, from her tendency to exaggeration, was at times almost
painful.
Although these defects could not escape me, yet I, more than any one,
was especially qualified to overlook such minor weaknesses, and realise
with enthusiasm the incomparable greatness of her performances. Indeed, it
only needed the stimulus of excitement, which this actress’s exceptionally
eventful life still procured, fully to restore the creative power of her prime,
a fact of which I was subsequently to receive striking demonstrations. But I
was seriously troubled and depressed at seeing how strong was the
disintegrating effect of theatrical life upon the character of this singer, who
had originally been endowed with such great and noble qualities. From the
very mouth through which the great actress’s inspired musical utterances
reached me, I was compelled to hear at other times very similar language to
that in which, with but few exceptions, nearly all heroines of the stage
indulge. The possession of a naturally fine voice, or even mere physical
advantages, which might place her rivals on the same footing as herself in
public favour, was more than she could endure; and so far was she from
acquiring the dignified resignation worthy of a great artist, that her jealousy
increased to a painful extent as years went on. I noticed this all the more
because I had reason to suffer from it. A fact which caused me even greater
trouble, however, was that she did not grasp music easily, and the study of a
new part involved difficulties which meant many a painful hour for the
composer who had to make her master his work. Her difficulty in learning
new parts, and particularly that of Adriano in Rienzi, entailed
disappointments for her which caused me a good deal of trouble.
If, in her case, I had to handle a great and sensitive nature very tenderly, I
had, on the other hand, a very easy task with Tichatschek, with his childish
limitations and superficial, but exceptionally brilliant, talents. He did not
Page 256
trouble to learn his parts by heart, as he was so musical that he could sing
the most difficult music at sight, and thought all further study needless,
whereas with most other singers the work consisted in mastering the score.
Hence, if he sang through a part at rehearsals often enough to impress it on
his memory, the rest, that is to say, everything pertaining to vocal art and
dramatic delivery, would follow naturally. In this way he picked up any
clerical errors there might be in the libretto, and that with such incorrigible
pertinacity, that he uttered the wrong words with just the same expression as
if they were correct. He waved aside good-humouredly any expostulations
or hints as to the sense with the remark, ‘Ah! that will be all right soon.’
And, in fact, I very soon resigned myself and quite gave up trying to get the
singer to use his intelligence in the interpretation of the part of the hero, for
which I was very agreeably compensated by the light-hearted enthusiasm
with which he flung himself into his congenial role, and the irresistible
effect of his brilliant voice.
With the exception of these two actors who played the leading parts, I
had only very moderate material at my disposal. But there was plenty of
goodwill, and I had recourse to an ingenious device to induce Reissiger the
conductor to hold frequent piano rehearsals. He had complained to me of
the difficulty he had always found in securing a well-written libretto, and
thought it was very sensible of me to have acquired the habit of writing my
own. In his youth he had unfortunately neglected to do this for himself, and
yet this was all he lacked to make a successful dramatic composer. I feel
bound to confess that he possessed ‘a good deal of melody’; but this, he
added, did not seem sufficient to inspire the singers with the requisite
enthusiasm. His experience was that Schroder-Devrient, in his Adele de
Foix, would render very indifferently the same final passage with which, in
Bellini’s Romeo and Juliet, she would put the audience into an ecstasy. The
reason for this, he presumed, must lie in the subject-matter. I at once
promised him that I would supply him with a libretto in which he would be
able to introduce these and similar melodies to the greatest advantage. To
this he gladly agreed, and I therefore set aside for versification, as a suitable
text for Reissiger, my Hohe Braut, founded on Konig’s romance, which I
had once before submitted to Scribe. I promised to bring Reissiger a page of
verse for every piano rehearsal, and this I faithfully did until the whole
book was done. I was much surprised to learn some time later that Reissiger
had had a new libretto written for him by an actor named Kriethe. This was
the most difficult music at sight, and thought all further study needless,
whereas with most other singers the work consisted in mastering the score.
Hence, if he sang through a part at rehearsals often enough to impress it on
his memory, the rest, that is to say, everything pertaining to vocal art and
dramatic delivery, would follow naturally. In this way he picked up any
clerical errors there might be in the libretto, and that with such incorrigible
pertinacity, that he uttered the wrong words with just the same expression as
if they were correct. He waved aside good-humouredly any expostulations
or hints as to the sense with the remark, ‘Ah! that will be all right soon.’
And, in fact, I very soon resigned myself and quite gave up trying to get the
singer to use his intelligence in the interpretation of the part of the hero, for
which I was very agreeably compensated by the light-hearted enthusiasm
with which he flung himself into his congenial role, and the irresistible
effect of his brilliant voice.
With the exception of these two actors who played the leading parts, I
had only very moderate material at my disposal. But there was plenty of
goodwill, and I had recourse to an ingenious device to induce Reissiger the
conductor to hold frequent piano rehearsals. He had complained to me of
the difficulty he had always found in securing a well-written libretto, and
thought it was very sensible of me to have acquired the habit of writing my
own. In his youth he had unfortunately neglected to do this for himself, and
yet this was all he lacked to make a successful dramatic composer. I feel
bound to confess that he possessed ‘a good deal of melody’; but this, he
added, did not seem sufficient to inspire the singers with the requisite
enthusiasm. His experience was that Schroder-Devrient, in his Adele de
Foix, would render very indifferently the same final passage with which, in
Bellini’s Romeo and Juliet, she would put the audience into an ecstasy. The
reason for this, he presumed, must lie in the subject-matter. I at once
promised him that I would supply him with a libretto in which he would be
able to introduce these and similar melodies to the greatest advantage. To
this he gladly agreed, and I therefore set aside for versification, as a suitable
text for Reissiger, my Hohe Braut, founded on Konig’s romance, which I
had once before submitted to Scribe. I promised to bring Reissiger a page of
verse for every piano rehearsal, and this I faithfully did until the whole
book was done. I was much surprised to learn some time later that Reissiger
had had a new libretto written for him by an actor named Kriethe. This was
Page 257
called the Wreck of the Medusa. I then learned that the wife of the
conductor, who was a suspicious woman, had been filled with the greatest
concern at my readiness to give up a libretto to her husband. They both
thought the book was good and full of striking effects, but they suspected
some sort of trap in the background, to escape from which they must
certainly exercise the greatest caution. The result was that I regained
possession of my libretto and was able, later on, to help my old friend Kittl
with it in Prague; he set it to music of his own, and entitled it Die Franzosen
vor Nizza. I heard that it was frequently performed in Prague with great
success, though I never saw it myself; and I was also told at the same time
by a local critic that this text was a proof of my real aptitude as a librettist,
and that it was a mistake for me to devote myself to composition. As
regards my Tannhäuser, on the other hand, Laube used to declare it was a
misfortune that I had not got an experienced dramatist to supply me with a
decent text for my music.
For the time being, however, this work of versification had the desired
result, and Reissiger kept steadily to the study of Rienzi. But what
encouraged him even more than my verses was the growing interest of the
singers, and above all the genuine enthusiasm of Tichatschek. This man,
who had been so ready to leave the delights of the theatre piano for a
shooting party, now looked upon the rehearsals of Rienzi as a genuine treat.
He always attended them with radiant eyes and boisterous good-humour. I
soon felt myself in a state of constant exhilaration: favourite passages were
greeted with acclamation by the singers at every rehearsal, and a concerted
number of the third finale, which unfortunately had afterwards to be
omitted owing to its length, actually became on that occasion a source of
profit to me. For Tichatschek maintained that this B minor was so lovely
that something ought to be paid for it every time, and he put down a silver
penny, inviting the others to do the same, to which they all responded
merrily. From that day forward, whenever we came to this passage at
rehearsals, the cry was raised, ‘Here comes the silver penny part,’ and
Schroder-Devrient, as she took out her purse, remarked that these rehearsals
would ruin her. This gratuity was conscientiously handed to me each time,
and no one suspected that these contributions, which were given as a joke,
were often a very welcome help towards defraying the cost of our daily
food. For Minna had returned from Toplitz, at the beginning of August,
accompanied by my mother.
conductor, who was a suspicious woman, had been filled with the greatest
concern at my readiness to give up a libretto to her husband. They both
thought the book was good and full of striking effects, but they suspected
some sort of trap in the background, to escape from which they must
certainly exercise the greatest caution. The result was that I regained
possession of my libretto and was able, later on, to help my old friend Kittl
with it in Prague; he set it to music of his own, and entitled it Die Franzosen
vor Nizza. I heard that it was frequently performed in Prague with great
success, though I never saw it myself; and I was also told at the same time
by a local critic that this text was a proof of my real aptitude as a librettist,
and that it was a mistake for me to devote myself to composition. As
regards my Tannhäuser, on the other hand, Laube used to declare it was a
misfortune that I had not got an experienced dramatist to supply me with a
decent text for my music.
For the time being, however, this work of versification had the desired
result, and Reissiger kept steadily to the study of Rienzi. But what
encouraged him even more than my verses was the growing interest of the
singers, and above all the genuine enthusiasm of Tichatschek. This man,
who had been so ready to leave the delights of the theatre piano for a
shooting party, now looked upon the rehearsals of Rienzi as a genuine treat.
He always attended them with radiant eyes and boisterous good-humour. I
soon felt myself in a state of constant exhilaration: favourite passages were
greeted with acclamation by the singers at every rehearsal, and a concerted
number of the third finale, which unfortunately had afterwards to be
omitted owing to its length, actually became on that occasion a source of
profit to me. For Tichatschek maintained that this B minor was so lovely
that something ought to be paid for it every time, and he put down a silver
penny, inviting the others to do the same, to which they all responded
merrily. From that day forward, whenever we came to this passage at
rehearsals, the cry was raised, ‘Here comes the silver penny part,’ and
Schroder-Devrient, as she took out her purse, remarked that these rehearsals
would ruin her. This gratuity was conscientiously handed to me each time,
and no one suspected that these contributions, which were given as a joke,
were often a very welcome help towards defraying the cost of our daily
food. For Minna had returned from Toplitz, at the beginning of August,
accompanied by my mother.
Page 258
We lived very frugally in chilly lodgings, hopefully awaiting the tardy
day of our deliverance. The months of August and September passed, in
preparation for my work, amid frequent disturbances caused by the
fluctuating and scanty repertoire of a German opera house, and not until
October did the combined rehearsals assume such a character as to promise
the certainty of a speedy production. From the very beginning of the general
rehearsals with the orchestra we all shared the conviction that the opera
would, without doubt, be a great success. Finally, the full dress rehearsals
produced a perfectly intoxicating effect. When we tried the first scene of the
second act with the scenery complete, and the messengers of peace entered,
there was a general outburst of emotion, and even Schroder-Devrient, who
was bitterly prejudiced against her part, as it was not the role of the heroine,
could only answer my questions in a voice stifled with tears. I believe the
whole theatrical body, down to its humblest officials, loved me as though I
were a real prodigy, and I am probably not far wrong in saying that much of
this arose from sympathy and lively fellow-feeling for a young man, whose
exceptional difficulties were not unknown to them, and who now suddenly
stepped out of perfect obscurity into splendour. During the interval at the
full dress rehearsal, while other members had dispersed to revive their jaded
nerves with lunch, I remained seated on a pile of boards on the stage, in
order that no one might realise that I was in the quandary of being unable to
obtain similar refreshment. An invalid Italian singer, who was taking a
small part in the opera, seemed to notice this, and kindly brought me a glass
of wine and a piece of bread. I was sorry that I was obliged to deprive him
of even his small part in the course of the year, for its loss provoked such
ill-treatment from his wife, that by conjugal tyranny he was driven into the
ranks of my enemies. When, after my flight from Dresden in 1849, I learned
that I had been denounced to the police by this same singer for supposed
complicity in the rising which took place in that town, I bethought me of
this breakfast during the Rienzi rehearsal, and felt I was being punished for
my ingratitude, for I knew I was guilty of having brought him into trouble
with his wife.
The frame of mind in which I looked forward to the first performance of
my work was a unique experience which I have never felt either before or
since. My kind sister Clara fully shared my feelings. She had been living a
wretched middle-class life at Chemnitz, which, just about this time, she had
left to come and share my fate in Dresden. The poor woman, whose
day of our deliverance. The months of August and September passed, in
preparation for my work, amid frequent disturbances caused by the
fluctuating and scanty repertoire of a German opera house, and not until
October did the combined rehearsals assume such a character as to promise
the certainty of a speedy production. From the very beginning of the general
rehearsals with the orchestra we all shared the conviction that the opera
would, without doubt, be a great success. Finally, the full dress rehearsals
produced a perfectly intoxicating effect. When we tried the first scene of the
second act with the scenery complete, and the messengers of peace entered,
there was a general outburst of emotion, and even Schroder-Devrient, who
was bitterly prejudiced against her part, as it was not the role of the heroine,
could only answer my questions in a voice stifled with tears. I believe the
whole theatrical body, down to its humblest officials, loved me as though I
were a real prodigy, and I am probably not far wrong in saying that much of
this arose from sympathy and lively fellow-feeling for a young man, whose
exceptional difficulties were not unknown to them, and who now suddenly
stepped out of perfect obscurity into splendour. During the interval at the
full dress rehearsal, while other members had dispersed to revive their jaded
nerves with lunch, I remained seated on a pile of boards on the stage, in
order that no one might realise that I was in the quandary of being unable to
obtain similar refreshment. An invalid Italian singer, who was taking a
small part in the opera, seemed to notice this, and kindly brought me a glass
of wine and a piece of bread. I was sorry that I was obliged to deprive him
of even his small part in the course of the year, for its loss provoked such
ill-treatment from his wife, that by conjugal tyranny he was driven into the
ranks of my enemies. When, after my flight from Dresden in 1849, I learned
that I had been denounced to the police by this same singer for supposed
complicity in the rising which took place in that town, I bethought me of
this breakfast during the Rienzi rehearsal, and felt I was being punished for
my ingratitude, for I knew I was guilty of having brought him into trouble
with his wife.
The frame of mind in which I looked forward to the first performance of
my work was a unique experience which I have never felt either before or
since. My kind sister Clara fully shared my feelings. She had been living a
wretched middle-class life at Chemnitz, which, just about this time, she had
left to come and share my fate in Dresden. The poor woman, whose
Page 259
undoubted artistic gifts had faded so early, was laboriously dragging out a
commonplace bourgeois existence as a wife and mother; but now, under the
influence of my growing success, she began joyously to breathe a new life.
She and I and the worthy chorus-master Fischer used to spend our evenings
with the Heine family, still over potatoes and herrings, and often in a
wonderfully elated frame of mind. The evening before our first performance
I was able to crown our happiness by myself ladling out a bowl of punch.
With mingled tears and laughter we skipped about like happy children, and
then in sleep prepared ourselves for the triumphant day to which we looked
forward with such confidence..
Although on the morning of 20th October, 1842 I had resolved not to
disturb any of my singers by a visit, yet I happened to come across one of
them, a stiff Philistine called Risse, who was playing a minor bass part in a
dull but respectable way. The day was rather cool, but wonderfully bright
and sunshiny, after the gloomy weather we had just been having. Without a
word this curious creature saluted me and then remained standing, as
though bewitched. He simply gazed into my face with wonder and rapture,
in order to find out, so he at last managed to tell me in strange confusion,
how a man looked who that very day was to face such an exceptional fate. I
smiled and reflected that it was indeed a day of crisis, and promised him
that I would soon drink a glass with him, at the Stadt Hamburg inn, of the
excellent wine he had recommended to me with so much agitation.
No subsequent experience of mine can be compared with the sensations
which marked the day of the first production of Rienzi. At all the first
performances of my works in later days, I have been so absorbed by an only
too well-founded anxiety as to their success, that I could neither enjoy the
opera nor form any real estimate of its reception by the public. As for my
subsequent experiences at the general rehearsal of Tristan und Isolde, this
took place under such exceptional circumstances, and its effect upon me
differed so fundamentally from that produced by the first performance of
Rienzi, that no comparison can possibly be drawn between the two.
The immediate success of Rienzi was no doubt assured beforehand. But
the emphatic way in which the audience declared their appreciation was
thus far exceptional, that in cities like Dresden the spectators are never in a
position to decide conclusively upon a work of importance on the first
night, and consequently assume an attitude of chilling restraint towards the
commonplace bourgeois existence as a wife and mother; but now, under the
influence of my growing success, she began joyously to breathe a new life.
She and I and the worthy chorus-master Fischer used to spend our evenings
with the Heine family, still over potatoes and herrings, and often in a
wonderfully elated frame of mind. The evening before our first performance
I was able to crown our happiness by myself ladling out a bowl of punch.
With mingled tears and laughter we skipped about like happy children, and
then in sleep prepared ourselves for the triumphant day to which we looked
forward with such confidence..
Although on the morning of 20th October, 1842 I had resolved not to
disturb any of my singers by a visit, yet I happened to come across one of
them, a stiff Philistine called Risse, who was playing a minor bass part in a
dull but respectable way. The day was rather cool, but wonderfully bright
and sunshiny, after the gloomy weather we had just been having. Without a
word this curious creature saluted me and then remained standing, as
though bewitched. He simply gazed into my face with wonder and rapture,
in order to find out, so he at last managed to tell me in strange confusion,
how a man looked who that very day was to face such an exceptional fate. I
smiled and reflected that it was indeed a day of crisis, and promised him
that I would soon drink a glass with him, at the Stadt Hamburg inn, of the
excellent wine he had recommended to me with so much agitation.
No subsequent experience of mine can be compared with the sensations
which marked the day of the first production of Rienzi. At all the first
performances of my works in later days, I have been so absorbed by an only
too well-founded anxiety as to their success, that I could neither enjoy the
opera nor form any real estimate of its reception by the public. As for my
subsequent experiences at the general rehearsal of Tristan und Isolde, this
took place under such exceptional circumstances, and its effect upon me
differed so fundamentally from that produced by the first performance of
Rienzi, that no comparison can possibly be drawn between the two.
The immediate success of Rienzi was no doubt assured beforehand. But
the emphatic way in which the audience declared their appreciation was
thus far exceptional, that in cities like Dresden the spectators are never in a
position to decide conclusively upon a work of importance on the first
night, and consequently assume an attitude of chilling restraint towards the
Page 260
works of unknown authors. But this was, in the nature of things, an
exceptional case, for the numerous staff of the theatre and the body of
musicians had inundated the city beforehand with such glowing reports of
my opera, that the whole population awaited the promised miracle in
feverish expectation. I sat with Minna, my sister Clara, and the Heine
family in a pit-box, and when I try to recall my condition during that
evening, I can only picture it with all the paraphernalia of a dream. Of real
pleasure or agitation I felt none at all: I seemed to stand quite aloof from my
work; whereas the sight of the thickly crowded auditorium agitated me so
much, that I was unable even to glance at the body of the audience, whose
presence merely affected me like some natural phenomenon—something
like a continuous downpour of rain—from which I sought shelter in the
farthest corner of my box as under a protecting roof. I was quite
unconscious of applause, and when at the end of the acts I was
tempestuously called for, I had every time to be forcibly reminded by Heine
and driven on to the stage. On the other hand, one great anxiety filled me
with growing alarm: I noticed that the first two acts had taken as long as the
whole of Freischutz, for instance. On account of its warlike calls to arms the
third act begins with an exceptional uproar, and when at its close the clock
pointed to ten, which meant that the performance had already lasted full
four hours, I became perfectly desperate. The fact that after this act, also, I
was again loudly called, I regarded merely as a final courtesy on the part of
the audience, who wished to signify that they had had quite enough for one
evening, and would now leave the house in a body. As we had still two acts
before us, I thought it settled that we should not be able to finish the piece,
and apologised for my lack of wisdom in not having previously effected the
necessary curtailments. Now, thanks to my folly, I found myself in the
unheard-of predicament of being unable to finish an opera, otherwise
extremely well received, simply because it was absurdly long. I could only
explain the undiminished zeal of the singers, and particularly of
Tichatschek, who seemed to grow lustier and cheerier the longer it lasted, as
an amiable trick to conceal from me the inevitable catastrophe. But my
astonishment at finding the audience still there in full muster, even in the
last act—towards midnight—filled me with imbounded perplexity. I could
no longer trust my eyes or ears, and regarded the whole events of the
evening as a nightmare. It was past midnight when, for the last time, I had
exceptional case, for the numerous staff of the theatre and the body of
musicians had inundated the city beforehand with such glowing reports of
my opera, that the whole population awaited the promised miracle in
feverish expectation. I sat with Minna, my sister Clara, and the Heine
family in a pit-box, and when I try to recall my condition during that
evening, I can only picture it with all the paraphernalia of a dream. Of real
pleasure or agitation I felt none at all: I seemed to stand quite aloof from my
work; whereas the sight of the thickly crowded auditorium agitated me so
much, that I was unable even to glance at the body of the audience, whose
presence merely affected me like some natural phenomenon—something
like a continuous downpour of rain—from which I sought shelter in the
farthest corner of my box as under a protecting roof. I was quite
unconscious of applause, and when at the end of the acts I was
tempestuously called for, I had every time to be forcibly reminded by Heine
and driven on to the stage. On the other hand, one great anxiety filled me
with growing alarm: I noticed that the first two acts had taken as long as the
whole of Freischutz, for instance. On account of its warlike calls to arms the
third act begins with an exceptional uproar, and when at its close the clock
pointed to ten, which meant that the performance had already lasted full
four hours, I became perfectly desperate. The fact that after this act, also, I
was again loudly called, I regarded merely as a final courtesy on the part of
the audience, who wished to signify that they had had quite enough for one
evening, and would now leave the house in a body. As we had still two acts
before us, I thought it settled that we should not be able to finish the piece,
and apologised for my lack of wisdom in not having previously effected the
necessary curtailments. Now, thanks to my folly, I found myself in the
unheard-of predicament of being unable to finish an opera, otherwise
extremely well received, simply because it was absurdly long. I could only
explain the undiminished zeal of the singers, and particularly of
Tichatschek, who seemed to grow lustier and cheerier the longer it lasted, as
an amiable trick to conceal from me the inevitable catastrophe. But my
astonishment at finding the audience still there in full muster, even in the
last act—towards midnight—filled me with imbounded perplexity. I could
no longer trust my eyes or ears, and regarded the whole events of the
evening as a nightmare. It was past midnight when, for the last time, I had
Page 261
to obey the thunderous calls of the audience, side by side with my trusty
singers.
My feeling of desperation at the unparalleled length of my opera was
augmented by the temper of my relatives, whom I saw for a short time after
the performance. Friedrich Brockhaus and his family had come over with
some friends from Leipzig, and had invited us to the inn, hoping to
celebrate an agreeable success over a pleasant supper, and possibly to drink
my health. But on arriving, kitchen and cellar were closed, and every one
was so worn out that nothing was to be heard but outcries at the
unparalleled case of an opera lasting from six o’clock till past twelve. No
further remarks were exchanged, and we stole away feeling quite stupefied.
About eight the next morning I put in an appearance at the clerks’ office,
in order that in case there should be a second performance I might arrange
the necessary curtailment of the parts. If, during the previous summer, I had
contested every beat with the faithful chorus-master Fischer, and proved
them all to be indispensable, I was now possessed by a blind rage for
striking out. There was not a single part of my score which seemed any
longer necessary—what the audience had been made to swallow the
previous evening now appeared but a chaos of sheer impossibilities, each
and all of which might be omitted without the slightest damage or risk of
being unintelligible. My one thought now was how to reduce my
convolution of monstrosities to decent limits. By dint of unsparing and
ruthless abbreviations handed over to the copyist, I hoped to avert a
catastrophe, for I expected nothing less than that the general manager,
together with the city and the theatre, would that very day give me to
understand that such a thing as the performance of my Last of the Tribunes
might perhaps be permitted once as a curiosity, but not oftener. All day
long, therefore, I carefully avoided going near the theatre, so as to give time
for my heroic abbreviations to do their salutary work, and for news of them
to spread through the city. But at midday I looked in again upon the
copyists, to assure myself that all had been duly performed as I had ordered.
I then learned that Tichatschek had also been there, and, after inspecting the
omissions that I had arranged, had forbidden their being carried out.
Fischer, the chorus-master, also wished to speak to me about them: work
was suspended, and I foresaw great confusion. I could not understand what
it all meant, and feared mischief if the arduous task were delayed. At length,
towards evening, I sought out Tichatschek at the theatre. Without giving
singers.
My feeling of desperation at the unparalleled length of my opera was
augmented by the temper of my relatives, whom I saw for a short time after
the performance. Friedrich Brockhaus and his family had come over with
some friends from Leipzig, and had invited us to the inn, hoping to
celebrate an agreeable success over a pleasant supper, and possibly to drink
my health. But on arriving, kitchen and cellar were closed, and every one
was so worn out that nothing was to be heard but outcries at the
unparalleled case of an opera lasting from six o’clock till past twelve. No
further remarks were exchanged, and we stole away feeling quite stupefied.
About eight the next morning I put in an appearance at the clerks’ office,
in order that in case there should be a second performance I might arrange
the necessary curtailment of the parts. If, during the previous summer, I had
contested every beat with the faithful chorus-master Fischer, and proved
them all to be indispensable, I was now possessed by a blind rage for
striking out. There was not a single part of my score which seemed any
longer necessary—what the audience had been made to swallow the
previous evening now appeared but a chaos of sheer impossibilities, each
and all of which might be omitted without the slightest damage or risk of
being unintelligible. My one thought now was how to reduce my
convolution of monstrosities to decent limits. By dint of unsparing and
ruthless abbreviations handed over to the copyist, I hoped to avert a
catastrophe, for I expected nothing less than that the general manager,
together with the city and the theatre, would that very day give me to
understand that such a thing as the performance of my Last of the Tribunes
might perhaps be permitted once as a curiosity, but not oftener. All day
long, therefore, I carefully avoided going near the theatre, so as to give time
for my heroic abbreviations to do their salutary work, and for news of them
to spread through the city. But at midday I looked in again upon the
copyists, to assure myself that all had been duly performed as I had ordered.
I then learned that Tichatschek had also been there, and, after inspecting the
omissions that I had arranged, had forbidden their being carried out.
Fischer, the chorus-master, also wished to speak to me about them: work
was suspended, and I foresaw great confusion. I could not understand what
it all meant, and feared mischief if the arduous task were delayed. At length,
towards evening, I sought out Tichatschek at the theatre. Without giving
Page 262
him a chance to speak, I brusquely asked him why he had interrupted the
copyists’ work. In a half-choked voice he curtly and defiantly rejoined, ‘I
will have none of my part cut out—it is too heavenly.’ I stared at him
blankly, and then felt as though I had been suddenly bewitched: such an
unheard-of testimony to my success could not but shake me out of my
strange anxiety. Others joined him, Fischer radiant with delight and
bubbling with laughter. Every one spoke of the enthusiastic emotion which
thrilled the whole city. Next came a letter of thanks from the Commissioner
acknowledging my splendid work. Nothing now remained for me but to
embrace Tichatschek and Fischer, and go on my way to inform Minna and
Clara how matters stood.
After a few days’ rest for the actors, the second performance took place
on 26th October, but with various curtailments, for which I had great
difficulty in obtaining Tichatschek’s consent. Although it was still of much
more than average length, I heard no particular complaints, and at last
adopted Tichatschek’s view that, if he could stand it, so could the audience.
For six performances therefore, all of which continued to receive a similar
avalanche of applause, I let the matter run its course.
My opera, however, had also excited interest among the elder princesses
of the royal family. They thought its exhausting length a drawback, but
were nevertheless unwilling to miss any of it. Lüttichau consequently
proposed that I should give the piece at full length, but half of it at a time on
two successive evenings. This suited me very well, and after an interval of a
few weeks we announced Rienzi’s Greatness for the first day, and His Fall
for the second. The first evening we gave two acts, and on the second three,
and for the latter I composed a special introductory prelude. This met with
the entire approval of our august patrons, and especially of the two eldest,
Princesses Amalie and Augusta. The public, on the contrary, simply
regarded this in the light of now being asked to pay two entrance fees for
one opera, and pronounced the new arrangement a decided fraud. Its
annoyance at the change was so great that it actually threatened to be fatal
to the attendance, and after three performances of the divided Rienzi the
management was obliged to go back to the old arrangement, which I
willingly made possible by introducing my cuttings again.
From this time forward the piece used to fill the house to overflowing as
often as it could be presented, and the permanence of its success became
copyists’ work. In a half-choked voice he curtly and defiantly rejoined, ‘I
will have none of my part cut out—it is too heavenly.’ I stared at him
blankly, and then felt as though I had been suddenly bewitched: such an
unheard-of testimony to my success could not but shake me out of my
strange anxiety. Others joined him, Fischer radiant with delight and
bubbling with laughter. Every one spoke of the enthusiastic emotion which
thrilled the whole city. Next came a letter of thanks from the Commissioner
acknowledging my splendid work. Nothing now remained for me but to
embrace Tichatschek and Fischer, and go on my way to inform Minna and
Clara how matters stood.
After a few days’ rest for the actors, the second performance took place
on 26th October, but with various curtailments, for which I had great
difficulty in obtaining Tichatschek’s consent. Although it was still of much
more than average length, I heard no particular complaints, and at last
adopted Tichatschek’s view that, if he could stand it, so could the audience.
For six performances therefore, all of which continued to receive a similar
avalanche of applause, I let the matter run its course.
My opera, however, had also excited interest among the elder princesses
of the royal family. They thought its exhausting length a drawback, but
were nevertheless unwilling to miss any of it. Lüttichau consequently
proposed that I should give the piece at full length, but half of it at a time on
two successive evenings. This suited me very well, and after an interval of a
few weeks we announced Rienzi’s Greatness for the first day, and His Fall
for the second. The first evening we gave two acts, and on the second three,
and for the latter I composed a special introductory prelude. This met with
the entire approval of our august patrons, and especially of the two eldest,
Princesses Amalie and Augusta. The public, on the contrary, simply
regarded this in the light of now being asked to pay two entrance fees for
one opera, and pronounced the new arrangement a decided fraud. Its
annoyance at the change was so great that it actually threatened to be fatal
to the attendance, and after three performances of the divided Rienzi the
management was obliged to go back to the old arrangement, which I
willingly made possible by introducing my cuttings again.
From this time forward the piece used to fill the house to overflowing as
often as it could be presented, and the permanence of its success became
Page 263
still more obvious when I began to realise the envy it drew upon me from
many different quarters. My first experience of this was truly painful, and
came from the hands of the poet, Julius Mosen, on the very day after the
first performance. When I first reached Dresden in the summer I had sought
him out, and, having a really high opinion of his talent, our intercourse soon
became more intimate, and was the means of giving me much pleasure and
instruction. He had shown me a volume of his plays, which on the whole
appealed to me exceptionally. Among these was a tragedy, Cola Rienzi,
dealing with the same subject as my opera, and in a manner partly new to
me, and which I thought effective. With reference to this poem, I had
begged him to take no notice of my libretto, as in the quality of its poetry it
could not possibly bear comparison with his own; and it cost him little
sacrifice to grant the request. It happened that just before the first
performance of my Rienzi, he had produced in Dresden Bernhard von
Weimar, one of his least happy pieces, the result of which had brought him
little pleasure. Dramatically it was a thing with no life in it, aiming only at
political harangue, and had shared the inevitable fate of all such aberrations.
He had therefore awaited the appearance of my Rienzi with some vexation,
and confessed to me his bitter chagrin at not being able to procure the
acceptance of his tragedy of the same name in Dresden. This, he presumed,
arose from its somewhat pronounced political tendency, which, certainly in
a spoken play on a similar subject, would be more noticeable than in an
opera, where from the very start no one pays any heed to the words. I had
genially confirmed him in this depreciation of the subject matter in opera;
and was therefore the more startled when, on finding him at my sister
Louisa’s the day after the first performance, he straightway overwhelmed
me with a scornful outburst of irritation at my success. But he found in me a
strange sense of the essential unreality in opera of such a subject as that
which I had just illustrated with so much success in Rienzi, so that,
oppressed by a secret sense of shame, I had no serious rejoinder to offer to
his candidly poisonous abuse. My line of defence was not yet sufficiently
clear in my own mind to be available offhand, nor was it yet backed by so
obvious a product of my own peculiar genius that I could venture to quote
it. Moreover, my first impulse was only one of pity for the unlucky
playwright, which I felt all the more constrained to express, because his
burst of fury gave me the inward satisfaction of knowing that he recognised
my great success, of which I was not yet quite clear myself.
many different quarters. My first experience of this was truly painful, and
came from the hands of the poet, Julius Mosen, on the very day after the
first performance. When I first reached Dresden in the summer I had sought
him out, and, having a really high opinion of his talent, our intercourse soon
became more intimate, and was the means of giving me much pleasure and
instruction. He had shown me a volume of his plays, which on the whole
appealed to me exceptionally. Among these was a tragedy, Cola Rienzi,
dealing with the same subject as my opera, and in a manner partly new to
me, and which I thought effective. With reference to this poem, I had
begged him to take no notice of my libretto, as in the quality of its poetry it
could not possibly bear comparison with his own; and it cost him little
sacrifice to grant the request. It happened that just before the first
performance of my Rienzi, he had produced in Dresden Bernhard von
Weimar, one of his least happy pieces, the result of which had brought him
little pleasure. Dramatically it was a thing with no life in it, aiming only at
political harangue, and had shared the inevitable fate of all such aberrations.
He had therefore awaited the appearance of my Rienzi with some vexation,
and confessed to me his bitter chagrin at not being able to procure the
acceptance of his tragedy of the same name in Dresden. This, he presumed,
arose from its somewhat pronounced political tendency, which, certainly in
a spoken play on a similar subject, would be more noticeable than in an
opera, where from the very start no one pays any heed to the words. I had
genially confirmed him in this depreciation of the subject matter in opera;
and was therefore the more startled when, on finding him at my sister
Louisa’s the day after the first performance, he straightway overwhelmed
me with a scornful outburst of irritation at my success. But he found in me a
strange sense of the essential unreality in opera of such a subject as that
which I had just illustrated with so much success in Rienzi, so that,
oppressed by a secret sense of shame, I had no serious rejoinder to offer to
his candidly poisonous abuse. My line of defence was not yet sufficiently
clear in my own mind to be available offhand, nor was it yet backed by so
obvious a product of my own peculiar genius that I could venture to quote
it. Moreover, my first impulse was only one of pity for the unlucky
playwright, which I felt all the more constrained to express, because his
burst of fury gave me the inward satisfaction of knowing that he recognised
my great success, of which I was not yet quite clear myself.
Page 264
But this first performance of Rienzi did far more than this. It gave
occasion for controversy, and made an ever-widening breach between
myself and the newspaper critics. Herr Karl Bank, who for some time had
been the chief musical critic in Dresden, had been known to me before at
Magdeburg, where he once visited me and listened with delight to my
playing of several fairly long passages from my Liebesverbot. When we
met again in Dresden, this man could not forgive me for having been unable
to procure him tickets for the first performance of Rienzi. The same thing
happened with a certain Herr Julius Schladebach, who likewise settled in
Dresden about that time as a critic. Though I was always anxious to be
gracious to everybody, yet I felt just then an invincible repugnance for
showing special deference to any man because he was a critic. As time went
on, I carried this rule to the point of almost systematic rudeness, and was
consequently all my life through the victim of unprecedented persecution
from the press. As yet, however, this ill-will had not become pronounced,
for at that time journalism had not begun to give itself airs in Dresden.
There were so few contributions sent from there to the outside press that our
artistic doings excited very little notice elsewhere, a fact which was
certainly not without its disadvantages for me. Thus for the present the
unpleasant side of my success scarcely affected me at all, and for a brief
space I felt myself, for the first and only time in my life, so pleasantly borne
along on the breath of general good-will, that all my former troubles
seemed amply requited.
For further and quite unexpected fruits of my success now appeared with
astonishing rapidity, though not so much in the form of material profit,
which for the present resolved itself into nine hundred marks, paid me by
the General Board as an exceptional fee instead of the usual twenty golden
louis. Nor did I dare to cherish the hope of selling my work advantageously
to a publisher, until it had been performed in some other important towns.
But fate willed it, that by the sudden death of Rastrelli, royal director of
music, which occurred shortly after the first production of Rienzi, an office
should unexpectedly become vacant, for the filling of which all eyes at once
turned to me.
While the negotiations over this matter were slowly proceeding, the
General Board gave proof in another direction of an almost passionate
interest in my talents. They insisted that the first performance of the
Fliegender Holländer should on no account be conceded to the Berlin opera,
occasion for controversy, and made an ever-widening breach between
myself and the newspaper critics. Herr Karl Bank, who for some time had
been the chief musical critic in Dresden, had been known to me before at
Magdeburg, where he once visited me and listened with delight to my
playing of several fairly long passages from my Liebesverbot. When we
met again in Dresden, this man could not forgive me for having been unable
to procure him tickets for the first performance of Rienzi. The same thing
happened with a certain Herr Julius Schladebach, who likewise settled in
Dresden about that time as a critic. Though I was always anxious to be
gracious to everybody, yet I felt just then an invincible repugnance for
showing special deference to any man because he was a critic. As time went
on, I carried this rule to the point of almost systematic rudeness, and was
consequently all my life through the victim of unprecedented persecution
from the press. As yet, however, this ill-will had not become pronounced,
for at that time journalism had not begun to give itself airs in Dresden.
There were so few contributions sent from there to the outside press that our
artistic doings excited very little notice elsewhere, a fact which was
certainly not without its disadvantages for me. Thus for the present the
unpleasant side of my success scarcely affected me at all, and for a brief
space I felt myself, for the first and only time in my life, so pleasantly borne
along on the breath of general good-will, that all my former troubles
seemed amply requited.
For further and quite unexpected fruits of my success now appeared with
astonishing rapidity, though not so much in the form of material profit,
which for the present resolved itself into nine hundred marks, paid me by
the General Board as an exceptional fee instead of the usual twenty golden
louis. Nor did I dare to cherish the hope of selling my work advantageously
to a publisher, until it had been performed in some other important towns.
But fate willed it, that by the sudden death of Rastrelli, royal director of
music, which occurred shortly after the first production of Rienzi, an office
should unexpectedly become vacant, for the filling of which all eyes at once
turned to me.
While the negotiations over this matter were slowly proceeding, the
General Board gave proof in another direction of an almost passionate
interest in my talents. They insisted that the first performance of the
Fliegender Holländer should on no account be conceded to the Berlin opera,
Page 265
but reserved as an honour for Dresden. As the Berlin authorities raised no
obstacle, I very gladly handed over my latest work also to the Dresden
theatre. If in this I had to dispense with Tichatschek’s assistance, as there
was no leading tenor part in the play, I could count all the more surely on
the helpful co-operation of Schroder-Devrient, to whom a worthier task was
assigned in the leading female part than that which she had had in Rienzi. I
was glad to be able thus to rely entirely upon her, as she had grown
strangely out of humour with me, owing to her scanty share in the success
of Rienzi. The completeness of my faith in her I proved with an
exaggeration by no means advantageous to my own work, by simply
forcing the leading male part on Wachter, a once capable, but now
somewhat delicate baritone. He was in every respect wholly unsuited to the
task, and only accepted it with unfeigned hesitation. On submitting my play
to my adored prima donna, I was much relieved to find that its poetry made
a special appeal to her. Thanks to the genuine personal interest awakened in
me under very peculiar circumstances by the character and fate of this
exceptional woman, our study of the part of Senta, which often brought us
into close contact, became one of the most thrilling and momentously
instructive periods of my life.
It is true that the great actress, especially when under the influence of her
famous mother, Sophie Schroder, who was just then with her on a visit,
showed undisguised vexation at my having composed so brilliant a work as
Rienzi for Dresden without having specifically reserved the principal part
for her. Yet the magnanimity of her disposition triumphed even over this
selfish impulse: she loudly proclaimed me ‘a genius,’ and honoured me with
that special confidence which, she said, none but a genius should enjoy. But
when she invited me to become both the accomplice and adviser in her
really dreadful love affairs, this confidence certainly began to have its risky
side; nevertheless there were at first occasions on which she openly
proclaimed herself before all the world as my friend, making most flattering
distinctions in my favour.
First of all I had to accompany her on a trip to Leipzig, where she was
giving a concert for her mother’s benefit, which she thought to make
particularly attractive by including in its programme two selections from
Rienzi—the aria of Adriano and the hero’s prayer (the latter sung by
Tichatschek), and both under my personal conductorship. Mendelssohn,
who was also on very friendly terms with her, had been enticed to this
obstacle, I very gladly handed over my latest work also to the Dresden
theatre. If in this I had to dispense with Tichatschek’s assistance, as there
was no leading tenor part in the play, I could count all the more surely on
the helpful co-operation of Schroder-Devrient, to whom a worthier task was
assigned in the leading female part than that which she had had in Rienzi. I
was glad to be able thus to rely entirely upon her, as she had grown
strangely out of humour with me, owing to her scanty share in the success
of Rienzi. The completeness of my faith in her I proved with an
exaggeration by no means advantageous to my own work, by simply
forcing the leading male part on Wachter, a once capable, but now
somewhat delicate baritone. He was in every respect wholly unsuited to the
task, and only accepted it with unfeigned hesitation. On submitting my play
to my adored prima donna, I was much relieved to find that its poetry made
a special appeal to her. Thanks to the genuine personal interest awakened in
me under very peculiar circumstances by the character and fate of this
exceptional woman, our study of the part of Senta, which often brought us
into close contact, became one of the most thrilling and momentously
instructive periods of my life.
It is true that the great actress, especially when under the influence of her
famous mother, Sophie Schroder, who was just then with her on a visit,
showed undisguised vexation at my having composed so brilliant a work as
Rienzi for Dresden without having specifically reserved the principal part
for her. Yet the magnanimity of her disposition triumphed even over this
selfish impulse: she loudly proclaimed me ‘a genius,’ and honoured me with
that special confidence which, she said, none but a genius should enjoy. But
when she invited me to become both the accomplice and adviser in her
really dreadful love affairs, this confidence certainly began to have its risky
side; nevertheless there were at first occasions on which she openly
proclaimed herself before all the world as my friend, making most flattering
distinctions in my favour.
First of all I had to accompany her on a trip to Leipzig, where she was
giving a concert for her mother’s benefit, which she thought to make
particularly attractive by including in its programme two selections from
Rienzi—the aria of Adriano and the hero’s prayer (the latter sung by
Tichatschek), and both under my personal conductorship. Mendelssohn,
who was also on very friendly terms with her, had been enticed to this
Page 266
concert too, and produced his overture to Ruy Blas, then quite new. It was
during the two busy days spent on this occasion in Leipzig that I first came
into close contact with him, all my previous knowledge of him having been
limited to a few rare and altogether profitless visits. At the house of my
brother-in-law, Fritz Brockhaus, he and Devrient gave us a good deal of
music, he playing her accompaniment to a number of Schubert’s songs. I
here became conscious of the peculiar unrest and excitement with which
this master of music, who, though still young, had already reached the
zenith of his fame and life’s work, observed or rather watched me. I could
see clearly that he thought but little of a success in opera, and that merely in
Dresden. Doubtless I seemed in his eyes one of a class of musicians to
whom he attached no value, and with whom he proposed to have no
intercourse. Nevertheless my success had certain characteristic features,
which gave it a more or less alarming aspect. Mendelssohn’s most ardent
desire for a long time past had been to write a successful opera, and it was
possible he now felt annoyed that, before he had succeeded in doing so, a
triumph of this nature should suddenly be thrust into his face with blunt
brutality, and based upon a style of music which he might feel justified in
regarding as poor. He probably found it no less exasperating that Devrient,
whose gifts he acknowledged, and who was his own devoted admirer,
should now so openly and loudly sound my praises. These thoughts were
dimly shaping themselves in my mind, when Mendelssohn, by a very
remarkable statement, drove me, almost with violence, to adopt this
interpretation. On our way home together, after the joint concert rehearsal, I
was talking very warmly on the subject of music. Although by no means a
talkative man, he suddenly interrupted me with curiously hasty excitement
by the assertion that music had but one great fault, namely, that more than
any other art it stimulated not only our good, but also our evil qualities,
such, for instance, as jealousy. I blushed with shame to have to apply this
speech to his own feelings towards me; for I was profoundly conscious of
my innocence of ever having dreamed, even in the remotest degree, of
placing my own talents or performances as a musician in comparison with
his. Yet, strange to say, at this very concert he showed himself in a light by
no means calculated to place him beyond all possibility of comparison with
myself. A rendering of his Hebrides Overture would have placed him so
immeasurably above my two operatic airs, that all shyness at having to
stand beside him would have been spared me, as the gulf between our two
during the two busy days spent on this occasion in Leipzig that I first came
into close contact with him, all my previous knowledge of him having been
limited to a few rare and altogether profitless visits. At the house of my
brother-in-law, Fritz Brockhaus, he and Devrient gave us a good deal of
music, he playing her accompaniment to a number of Schubert’s songs. I
here became conscious of the peculiar unrest and excitement with which
this master of music, who, though still young, had already reached the
zenith of his fame and life’s work, observed or rather watched me. I could
see clearly that he thought but little of a success in opera, and that merely in
Dresden. Doubtless I seemed in his eyes one of a class of musicians to
whom he attached no value, and with whom he proposed to have no
intercourse. Nevertheless my success had certain characteristic features,
which gave it a more or less alarming aspect. Mendelssohn’s most ardent
desire for a long time past had been to write a successful opera, and it was
possible he now felt annoyed that, before he had succeeded in doing so, a
triumph of this nature should suddenly be thrust into his face with blunt
brutality, and based upon a style of music which he might feel justified in
regarding as poor. He probably found it no less exasperating that Devrient,
whose gifts he acknowledged, and who was his own devoted admirer,
should now so openly and loudly sound my praises. These thoughts were
dimly shaping themselves in my mind, when Mendelssohn, by a very
remarkable statement, drove me, almost with violence, to adopt this
interpretation. On our way home together, after the joint concert rehearsal, I
was talking very warmly on the subject of music. Although by no means a
talkative man, he suddenly interrupted me with curiously hasty excitement
by the assertion that music had but one great fault, namely, that more than
any other art it stimulated not only our good, but also our evil qualities,
such, for instance, as jealousy. I blushed with shame to have to apply this
speech to his own feelings towards me; for I was profoundly conscious of
my innocence of ever having dreamed, even in the remotest degree, of
placing my own talents or performances as a musician in comparison with
his. Yet, strange to say, at this very concert he showed himself in a light by
no means calculated to place him beyond all possibility of comparison with
myself. A rendering of his Hebrides Overture would have placed him so
immeasurably above my two operatic airs, that all shyness at having to
stand beside him would have been spared me, as the gulf between our two
Page 267
productions was impassable. But in his choice of the Ruy Blas Overture he
appears to have been prompted by a desire to place himself on this occasion
so close to the operatic style that its effectiveness might be reflected upon
his own work. The overture was evidently calculated for a Parisian
audience, and the astonishment Mendelssohn caused by appearing in such a
connection was shown by Robert Schumann in his own ungainly fashion at
its close. Approaching the musician in the orchestra, he blandly, and with a
genial smile, expressed his admiration of the ‘brilliant orchestral piece’ just
played..
But in the interests of veracity let me not forget that neither he nor I
scored the real success of that evening. We were both wholly eclipsed by
the tremendous effect produced by the grey-haired Sophie Schroder in a
recitation of Burger’s Lenore. While the daughter had been taunted in the
newspapers with unfairly employing all sorts of musical attractions to cozen
a benefit concert out of the music lovers of Leipzig for a mother who never
had anything to do with that art, we, who were there as her musical aiders
and abettors, had to stand like so many idle conjurers, while this aged and
almost toothless dame declaimed Burger’s poem with truly terrifying
beauty and grandeur. This episode, like so much else that I saw during these
few days, gave me abundant food for thought and meditation.
A second excursion, also undertaken with Devrient, took me in the
December of that year to Berlin, where the singer had been invited to
appear at a grand state concert. I for my part wanted an interview with
Director Küstner about the Fliegender Holländer. Although I arrived at no
definite result regarding my own personal business, this short visit to Berlin
was memorable for my meeting with Franz Liszt, which afterwards proved
of great importance. It took place under singular circumstances, which
placed both him and me in a situation of peculiar embarrassment, brought
about in the most wanton fashion by Devrient’s exasperating caprice.
I had already told my patroness the story of my earlier meeting with
Liszt. During that fateful second winter of my stay in Paris, when I had at
last been driven to be grateful for Schlesinger’s hack-work, I one day
received word from Laube, who always bore me in mind, that F. Liszt was
coming to Paris. He had mentioned and recommended me to him when he
was in Germany, and advised me to lose no time in looking him up, as he
was ‘generous,’ and would certainly find means of helping me. As soon as I
appears to have been prompted by a desire to place himself on this occasion
so close to the operatic style that its effectiveness might be reflected upon
his own work. The overture was evidently calculated for a Parisian
audience, and the astonishment Mendelssohn caused by appearing in such a
connection was shown by Robert Schumann in his own ungainly fashion at
its close. Approaching the musician in the orchestra, he blandly, and with a
genial smile, expressed his admiration of the ‘brilliant orchestral piece’ just
played..
But in the interests of veracity let me not forget that neither he nor I
scored the real success of that evening. We were both wholly eclipsed by
the tremendous effect produced by the grey-haired Sophie Schroder in a
recitation of Burger’s Lenore. While the daughter had been taunted in the
newspapers with unfairly employing all sorts of musical attractions to cozen
a benefit concert out of the music lovers of Leipzig for a mother who never
had anything to do with that art, we, who were there as her musical aiders
and abettors, had to stand like so many idle conjurers, while this aged and
almost toothless dame declaimed Burger’s poem with truly terrifying
beauty and grandeur. This episode, like so much else that I saw during these
few days, gave me abundant food for thought and meditation.
A second excursion, also undertaken with Devrient, took me in the
December of that year to Berlin, where the singer had been invited to
appear at a grand state concert. I for my part wanted an interview with
Director Küstner about the Fliegender Holländer. Although I arrived at no
definite result regarding my own personal business, this short visit to Berlin
was memorable for my meeting with Franz Liszt, which afterwards proved
of great importance. It took place under singular circumstances, which
placed both him and me in a situation of peculiar embarrassment, brought
about in the most wanton fashion by Devrient’s exasperating caprice.
I had already told my patroness the story of my earlier meeting with
Liszt. During that fateful second winter of my stay in Paris, when I had at
last been driven to be grateful for Schlesinger’s hack-work, I one day
received word from Laube, who always bore me in mind, that F. Liszt was
coming to Paris. He had mentioned and recommended me to him when he
was in Germany, and advised me to lose no time in looking him up, as he
was ‘generous,’ and would certainly find means of helping me. As soon as I
Page 268
heard that he had really arrived, I presented myself at the hotel to see him. It
was early in the morning. On my entrance I found several strange
gentlemen waiting in the drawing-room, where, after some time, we were
joined by Liszt himself, pleasant and affable, and wearing his indoor coat.
The conversation was carried on in French, and turned upon his experiences
during his last professional journey in Hungary. As I was unable to take
part, on account of the language, I listened for some time, feeling heartily
bored, until at last he asked me pleasantly what he could do for me. He
seemed unable to recall Laube’s recommendation, and all the answer I
could give was that I desired to make his acquaintance. To this he had
evidently no objection, and informed me he would take care to have a ticket
sent me for his great matinee, which was to take place shortly. My sole
attempt to introduce an artistic theme of conversation was a question as to
whether he knew Lowe’s Erlkonig as well as Schubert’s. His reply in the
negative frustrated this somewhat awkward attempt, and I ended my visit
by giving him my address. Thither his secretary, Belloni, presently sent me,
with a few polite words, a card of admission to a concert to be given
entirely by the master himself in the Salle Erard. I duly wended my way to
the overcrowded hall, and beheld the platform on which the grand piano
stood, closely beleaguered by the cream of Parisian female society, and
witnessed their enthusiastic ovations of this virtuoso, who was at that time
the wonder of the world. Moreover, I heard several of his most brilliant
pieces, such as ‘Variations on Robert le Diable,’ but carried away with me
no real impression beyond that of being stunned. This took place just at the
time when I abandoned a path which had been contrary to my truer nature,
and had led me astray, and on which I now emphatically turned my back in
silent bitterness. I was therefore in no fitting mood for a just appreciation of
this prodigy, who at that time was shining in the blazing light of day, but
from whom I had turned my face to the night. I went to see Liszt no more.
As already mentioned, I had given Devrient a bare outline of this story,
but she had noted it with particular attention, for I happened to have
touched her weak point of professional jealousy. As Liszt had also been
commanded by the King of Prussia to appear at the grand state concert at
Berlin, it so happened that the first time they met Liszt questioned her with
great interest about the success of Rienzi. She thereupon observed that the
composer of that opera was an altogether unknown man, and proceeded
with curious malice to taunt him with his apparent lack of penetration, as
was early in the morning. On my entrance I found several strange
gentlemen waiting in the drawing-room, where, after some time, we were
joined by Liszt himself, pleasant and affable, and wearing his indoor coat.
The conversation was carried on in French, and turned upon his experiences
during his last professional journey in Hungary. As I was unable to take
part, on account of the language, I listened for some time, feeling heartily
bored, until at last he asked me pleasantly what he could do for me. He
seemed unable to recall Laube’s recommendation, and all the answer I
could give was that I desired to make his acquaintance. To this he had
evidently no objection, and informed me he would take care to have a ticket
sent me for his great matinee, which was to take place shortly. My sole
attempt to introduce an artistic theme of conversation was a question as to
whether he knew Lowe’s Erlkonig as well as Schubert’s. His reply in the
negative frustrated this somewhat awkward attempt, and I ended my visit
by giving him my address. Thither his secretary, Belloni, presently sent me,
with a few polite words, a card of admission to a concert to be given
entirely by the master himself in the Salle Erard. I duly wended my way to
the overcrowded hall, and beheld the platform on which the grand piano
stood, closely beleaguered by the cream of Parisian female society, and
witnessed their enthusiastic ovations of this virtuoso, who was at that time
the wonder of the world. Moreover, I heard several of his most brilliant
pieces, such as ‘Variations on Robert le Diable,’ but carried away with me
no real impression beyond that of being stunned. This took place just at the
time when I abandoned a path which had been contrary to my truer nature,
and had led me astray, and on which I now emphatically turned my back in
silent bitterness. I was therefore in no fitting mood for a just appreciation of
this prodigy, who at that time was shining in the blazing light of day, but
from whom I had turned my face to the night. I went to see Liszt no more.
As already mentioned, I had given Devrient a bare outline of this story,
but she had noted it with particular attention, for I happened to have
touched her weak point of professional jealousy. As Liszt had also been
commanded by the King of Prussia to appear at the grand state concert at
Berlin, it so happened that the first time they met Liszt questioned her with
great interest about the success of Rienzi. She thereupon observed that the
composer of that opera was an altogether unknown man, and proceeded
with curious malice to taunt him with his apparent lack of penetration, as
Page 269
proved by the fact that the said composer, who now so keenly excited his
interest, was the very same poor musician whom he had lately ‘turned away
so contemptuously’ in Paris. All this she told me with an air of triumph,
which distressed me very much, and I at once set to work to correct the
false impression conveyed by my former account. As we were still debating
this point in her room, we were startled by hearing from the next the famous
bass part in the ‘Revenge’ air from Donna Anna, rapidly executed in
octaves on the piano. ‘That’s Liszt himself,’ she cried. Liszt then entered the
room to fetch her for the rehearsal. To my great embarrassment she
introduced me to him with malicious delight as the composer of Rienzi, the
man whose acquaintance he now wished to make after having previously
shown him the door in his glorious Paris. My solemn asseverations that my
patroness—no doubt only in fun—was deliberately distorting my account of
my former visit to him, apparently pacified him so far as I was concerned,
and, on the other hand, he had no doubt already formed his own opinion of
the impulsive singer. He certainly regretted that he could not remember my
visit in Paris, but it nevertheless shocked and alarmed him to learn that any
one should have had reason to complain of such treatment at his hands. The
hearty sincerity of Listz’s simple words to me about this misunderstanding,
as contrasted with the strangely passionate raillery of the incorrigible lady,
made a most pleasing and captivating impression upon me. The whole
bearing of the man, and the way in which he tried to ward off the pitiless
scorn of her attacks, was something new to me, and gave me a deep insight
into his character, so firm in its amiability and boundless good-nature.
Finally, she teased him about the Doctor’s degree which had just been
conferred on him by the University of Königsberg, and pretended to
mistake him for a chemist. At last he stretched himself out flat on the floor,
and implored her mercy, declaring himself quite defenceless against the
storm of her invective. Then turning to me with a hearty assurance that he
would make it his business to hear Rienzi, and would in any case endeavour
to give me a better opinion of himself than his evil star had hitherto
permitted, we parted for that occasion.
The almost naive simplicity and naturalness of his every phrase and
word, and particularly his emphatic manner, left a most profound
impression upon me. No one could fail to be equally affected by these
qualities, and I now realised for the first time the almost magic power
interest, was the very same poor musician whom he had lately ‘turned away
so contemptuously’ in Paris. All this she told me with an air of triumph,
which distressed me very much, and I at once set to work to correct the
false impression conveyed by my former account. As we were still debating
this point in her room, we were startled by hearing from the next the famous
bass part in the ‘Revenge’ air from Donna Anna, rapidly executed in
octaves on the piano. ‘That’s Liszt himself,’ she cried. Liszt then entered the
room to fetch her for the rehearsal. To my great embarrassment she
introduced me to him with malicious delight as the composer of Rienzi, the
man whose acquaintance he now wished to make after having previously
shown him the door in his glorious Paris. My solemn asseverations that my
patroness—no doubt only in fun—was deliberately distorting my account of
my former visit to him, apparently pacified him so far as I was concerned,
and, on the other hand, he had no doubt already formed his own opinion of
the impulsive singer. He certainly regretted that he could not remember my
visit in Paris, but it nevertheless shocked and alarmed him to learn that any
one should have had reason to complain of such treatment at his hands. The
hearty sincerity of Listz’s simple words to me about this misunderstanding,
as contrasted with the strangely passionate raillery of the incorrigible lady,
made a most pleasing and captivating impression upon me. The whole
bearing of the man, and the way in which he tried to ward off the pitiless
scorn of her attacks, was something new to me, and gave me a deep insight
into his character, so firm in its amiability and boundless good-nature.
Finally, she teased him about the Doctor’s degree which had just been
conferred on him by the University of Königsberg, and pretended to
mistake him for a chemist. At last he stretched himself out flat on the floor,
and implored her mercy, declaring himself quite defenceless against the
storm of her invective. Then turning to me with a hearty assurance that he
would make it his business to hear Rienzi, and would in any case endeavour
to give me a better opinion of himself than his evil star had hitherto
permitted, we parted for that occasion.
The almost naive simplicity and naturalness of his every phrase and
word, and particularly his emphatic manner, left a most profound
impression upon me. No one could fail to be equally affected by these
qualities, and I now realised for the first time the almost magic power
Page 270
exerted by Liszt over all who came in close contact with him, and saw how
erroneous had been my former opinion as to its cause.
These two excursions to Leipzig and Berlin found but brief interruptions
of the period devoted at home to our study of the Fliegender Holländer. It
was therefore, of paramount importance to me to maintain Schroder-
Devrient’s keen interest in her part, since, in view of the weakness of the
rest of the cast, I was convinced that it was from her alone I could expect
any adequate interpretation of the spirit of my work.
The part of Senta was essentially suited to her, and there were just at that
moment peculiar circumstances in her life which brought her naturally
emotional temperament to a high pitch of tension. I was amazed when she
confided to me that she was on the point of breaking off a regular liaison of
many years’ standing, to form, in passionate haste, another much less
desirable one. The forsaken lover, who was tenderly devoted to her, was a
young lieutenant in the Royal Guards, and the son of Muller, the ex-
Minister of Education; her new choice, whose acquaintance she had formed
on a recent visit to Berlin, was Herr von Munchhausen. He was a tall, slim
young man, and her predilection for him was easily explained when I
became more closely acquainted with her love affairs. It seemed to me that
the bestowal of her confidence on me in this matter arose from her guilty
conscience; she was aware that Muller, whom I liked on account of his
excellent disposition, had loved her with the earnestness of a first love, and
also that she was now betraying him in the most faithless way on a trivial
pretext. She must have known that her new lover was entirely unworthy of
her, and that his intentions were frivolous and selfish. She knew, too, that no
one, and certainly none of her older friends who knew her best, would
approve of her behaviour. She told me candidly that she had felt impelled to
confide in me because I was a genius, and would understand the demands
of her temperament. I hardly knew what to think. I was repelled alike by her
passion and the circumstances attending it; but to my astonishment I had to
confess that the infatuation, so repulsive to me, held this strange woman in
so powerful a grasp that I could not refuse her a certain amount of pity, nay,
even real sympathy.
She was pale and distraught, ate hardly anything, and her faculties were
subjected to a strain so extraordinary that I thought she would not escape a
serious, perhaps a fatal illness. Sleep had long since deserted her, and
erroneous had been my former opinion as to its cause.
These two excursions to Leipzig and Berlin found but brief interruptions
of the period devoted at home to our study of the Fliegender Holländer. It
was therefore, of paramount importance to me to maintain Schroder-
Devrient’s keen interest in her part, since, in view of the weakness of the
rest of the cast, I was convinced that it was from her alone I could expect
any adequate interpretation of the spirit of my work.
The part of Senta was essentially suited to her, and there were just at that
moment peculiar circumstances in her life which brought her naturally
emotional temperament to a high pitch of tension. I was amazed when she
confided to me that she was on the point of breaking off a regular liaison of
many years’ standing, to form, in passionate haste, another much less
desirable one. The forsaken lover, who was tenderly devoted to her, was a
young lieutenant in the Royal Guards, and the son of Muller, the ex-
Minister of Education; her new choice, whose acquaintance she had formed
on a recent visit to Berlin, was Herr von Munchhausen. He was a tall, slim
young man, and her predilection for him was easily explained when I
became more closely acquainted with her love affairs. It seemed to me that
the bestowal of her confidence on me in this matter arose from her guilty
conscience; she was aware that Muller, whom I liked on account of his
excellent disposition, had loved her with the earnestness of a first love, and
also that she was now betraying him in the most faithless way on a trivial
pretext. She must have known that her new lover was entirely unworthy of
her, and that his intentions were frivolous and selfish. She knew, too, that no
one, and certainly none of her older friends who knew her best, would
approve of her behaviour. She told me candidly that she had felt impelled to
confide in me because I was a genius, and would understand the demands
of her temperament. I hardly knew what to think. I was repelled alike by her
passion and the circumstances attending it; but to my astonishment I had to
confess that the infatuation, so repulsive to me, held this strange woman in
so powerful a grasp that I could not refuse her a certain amount of pity, nay,
even real sympathy.
She was pale and distraught, ate hardly anything, and her faculties were
subjected to a strain so extraordinary that I thought she would not escape a
serious, perhaps a fatal illness. Sleep had long since deserted her, and
Page 271
whenever I brought her my unlucky Fliegender Holländer, her looks so
alarmed me that the proposed rehearsal was the last thing I thought of. But
in this matter she insisted; she made me sit down at the piano, and then
plunged into the study of her role as if it were a matter of life and death.
She found the actual learning of the part very difficult, and it was only by
repeated and persevering rehearsal that she mastered her task. She would
sing for hours at a time with such passion that I often sprang up in terror
and begged her to spare herself; then she would point smiling to her chest,
and expand the muscles of her still magnificent person, to assure me that
she was doing herself no harm. Her voice really acquired at that time a
youthful freshness and power of endurance. I had to confess that which
often astonished me: this infatuation for an insipid nobody was very much
to the advantage of my Senta. Her courage under this intense strain was so
great that, as time pressed, she consented to have the general rehearsal on
the very day of the first performance, and a delay which would have been
greatly to my disadvantage was thus avoided.
The performance took place on 2nd January, in the year 1843. Its result
was extremely instructive to me, and led to the turning-point of my career.
The ill-success of the performance taught me how much care and
forethought were essential to secure the adequate dramatic interpretation of
my latest works. I realised that I had more or less believed that my score
would explain itself, and that my singers would arrive at the right
interpretation of their own accord. My good old friend Wachter, who at the
time of Henriette Sontag’s first success was a favourite ‘Barber of Seville,’
had from the first discreetly thought otherwise. Unfortunately, even
Schroder-Devrient only saw when the rehearsals were too far advanced how
utterly incapable Wachter was of realising the horror and supreme suffering
of my Mariner. His distressing corpulence, his broad fat face, the
extraordinary movements of his arms and legs, which he managed to make
look like mere stumps, drove my passionate Senta to despair. At one
rehearsal, when in the great scene in Act ii. she comes to him in the guise of
a guardian angel to bring the message of salvation, she broke off to whisper
despairingly in my ear, ‘How can I say it when I look into those beady
eyes? Good God, Wagner, what a muddle you have made!’ I consoled her as
well as I could, and secretly placed my dependence on Herr von
Munchhausen, who promised faithfully to sit that evening in the front row
of the stalls, so that Devrient’s eyes must fall on him. And the magnificent
alarmed me that the proposed rehearsal was the last thing I thought of. But
in this matter she insisted; she made me sit down at the piano, and then
plunged into the study of her role as if it were a matter of life and death.
She found the actual learning of the part very difficult, and it was only by
repeated and persevering rehearsal that she mastered her task. She would
sing for hours at a time with such passion that I often sprang up in terror
and begged her to spare herself; then she would point smiling to her chest,
and expand the muscles of her still magnificent person, to assure me that
she was doing herself no harm. Her voice really acquired at that time a
youthful freshness and power of endurance. I had to confess that which
often astonished me: this infatuation for an insipid nobody was very much
to the advantage of my Senta. Her courage under this intense strain was so
great that, as time pressed, she consented to have the general rehearsal on
the very day of the first performance, and a delay which would have been
greatly to my disadvantage was thus avoided.
The performance took place on 2nd January, in the year 1843. Its result
was extremely instructive to me, and led to the turning-point of my career.
The ill-success of the performance taught me how much care and
forethought were essential to secure the adequate dramatic interpretation of
my latest works. I realised that I had more or less believed that my score
would explain itself, and that my singers would arrive at the right
interpretation of their own accord. My good old friend Wachter, who at the
time of Henriette Sontag’s first success was a favourite ‘Barber of Seville,’
had from the first discreetly thought otherwise. Unfortunately, even
Schroder-Devrient only saw when the rehearsals were too far advanced how
utterly incapable Wachter was of realising the horror and supreme suffering
of my Mariner. His distressing corpulence, his broad fat face, the
extraordinary movements of his arms and legs, which he managed to make
look like mere stumps, drove my passionate Senta to despair. At one
rehearsal, when in the great scene in Act ii. she comes to him in the guise of
a guardian angel to bring the message of salvation, she broke off to whisper
despairingly in my ear, ‘How can I say it when I look into those beady
eyes? Good God, Wagner, what a muddle you have made!’ I consoled her as
well as I could, and secretly placed my dependence on Herr von
Munchhausen, who promised faithfully to sit that evening in the front row
of the stalls, so that Devrient’s eyes must fall on him. And the magnificent
Page 272
performance of my great artiste, although she stood horribly alone on the
stage, did succeed in rousing enthusiasm in the second act. The first act
offered the audience nothing but a dull conversation between Herr Wachter
and that Herr Risse who had invited me to an excellent glass of wine on the
first night of Rienzi, and in the third the loudest raging of the orchestra did
not rouse the sea from its dead calm nor the phantom ship in its cautious
rocking. The audience fell to wondering how I could have produced this
crude, meagre, and gloomy work after Rienzi, in every act of which
incident abounded, and Tichatschek shone in an endless variety of
costumes.
As Schroder-Devrient soon left Dresden for a considerable time, the
Fliegender Holländer saw only four performances, at which the diminishing
audiences made it plain that I had not pleased Dresden taste with it. The
management was compelled to revive Rienzi in order to maintain my
prestige; and the triumph of this opera compared with the failure of the
Dutchman gave me food for reflection. I had to admit, with some
misgivings, that the success of my Rienzi was not entirely due to the cast
and staging, although I was fully alive to the defects from which the
Fliegender Holländer suffered in this respect. Although Wachter was far
from realising my conception of the Fliegender Holländer I could not
conceal from myself the fact that Tichatschek was quite as far removed
from the ideal Rienzi. His abominable errors and deficiencies in his
presentation of the part had never escaped me; he had never been able to lay
aside his brilliant and heroic leading-tenor manners in order to render that
gloomy demonic strain in Rienzi’s temperament on which I had laid
unmistakable stress at the critical points of the drama. In the fourth act, after
the pronouncement of the curse, he fell on his knees in the most melancholy
fashion and abandoned himself to bewailing his fate in piteous tones. When
I suggested to him that Rienzi, though inwardly despairing, must take up an
attitude of statuesque firmness before the world, he pointed out to me the
great popularity which the end of this very act had won as interpreted by
himself, with an intimation that he intended making no change in it.
And when I considered the real causes of the success of Rienzi, I found
that it rested on the brilliant and extraordinarily fresh voice of the soaring,
happy singer, in the refreshing effect of the chorus and the gay movement
and colouring on the stage. I received a still more convincing proof of this
when we divided the opera into two, and found that the second part, which
stage, did succeed in rousing enthusiasm in the second act. The first act
offered the audience nothing but a dull conversation between Herr Wachter
and that Herr Risse who had invited me to an excellent glass of wine on the
first night of Rienzi, and in the third the loudest raging of the orchestra did
not rouse the sea from its dead calm nor the phantom ship in its cautious
rocking. The audience fell to wondering how I could have produced this
crude, meagre, and gloomy work after Rienzi, in every act of which
incident abounded, and Tichatschek shone in an endless variety of
costumes.
As Schroder-Devrient soon left Dresden for a considerable time, the
Fliegender Holländer saw only four performances, at which the diminishing
audiences made it plain that I had not pleased Dresden taste with it. The
management was compelled to revive Rienzi in order to maintain my
prestige; and the triumph of this opera compared with the failure of the
Dutchman gave me food for reflection. I had to admit, with some
misgivings, that the success of my Rienzi was not entirely due to the cast
and staging, although I was fully alive to the defects from which the
Fliegender Holländer suffered in this respect. Although Wachter was far
from realising my conception of the Fliegender Holländer I could not
conceal from myself the fact that Tichatschek was quite as far removed
from the ideal Rienzi. His abominable errors and deficiencies in his
presentation of the part had never escaped me; he had never been able to lay
aside his brilliant and heroic leading-tenor manners in order to render that
gloomy demonic strain in Rienzi’s temperament on which I had laid
unmistakable stress at the critical points of the drama. In the fourth act, after
the pronouncement of the curse, he fell on his knees in the most melancholy
fashion and abandoned himself to bewailing his fate in piteous tones. When
I suggested to him that Rienzi, though inwardly despairing, must take up an
attitude of statuesque firmness before the world, he pointed out to me the
great popularity which the end of this very act had won as interpreted by
himself, with an intimation that he intended making no change in it.
And when I considered the real causes of the success of Rienzi, I found
that it rested on the brilliant and extraordinarily fresh voice of the soaring,
happy singer, in the refreshing effect of the chorus and the gay movement
and colouring on the stage. I received a still more convincing proof of this
when we divided the opera into two, and found that the second part, which
Page 273
was the more important from both the dramatic and the musical point of
view, was noticeably less well attended than the first, for the very obvious
reason, as I thought, that the ballet occurred in the first part. My brother
Julius, who had come over from Leipzig for one of the performances of
Rienzi, gave me a still more naive testimony as to the real point of interest
in the opera. I was sitting with him in an open box, in full sight of the
audience, and had therefore begged him to desist from giving any applause,
even if directed only to the efforts of the singers; he restrained himself all
through the evening, but his enthusiasm at a certain figure of the ballet was
too much for him, and he clapped loudly, to the great amusement of the
audience, telling me that he could not hold himself in any longer. Curiously
enough, this same ballet secured for Rienzi, which was otherwise received
with indifference, the enduring preference of the present King of Prussia,[11]
who many years afterwards ordered the revival of this opera, although it
had utterly failed in arousing public interest by its merits as a drama.
[11] William the First.
I found, when I had to be present later on at a representation of the same
opera at Darmstadt, that while wholesale cuts had to be made in its best
parts, it had been found necessary to expand the ballets by additions and
repetitions. This ballet music, which I had put together with contemptuous
haste at Riga in a few days without any inspiration, seemed to me,
moreover, so strikingly weak that I was thoroughly ashamed of it even in
those days at Dresden, when I had found myself compelled to suppress its
best feature, the tragic pantomime. Further, the resources of the ballet in
Dresden did not even admit of the execution of my stage directions for the
combat in the arena, nor for the very significant round dances, both
admirably carried out at a later date in Berlin. I had to be content with the
humiliating substitution of a long, foolish step-dance by two insignificant
dancers, which was ended by a company of soldiers marching on, bearing
their shields on high so as to form a roof and remind the audience of the
Roman testudo; then the ballet-master with his assistant, in flesh-coloured
tights, leaped on to the shields and turned somersaults, a proceeding which
they thought was reminiscent of the gladiatorial games. It was at this point
that the house was always moved to resounding applause, and I had to own
that this moment marked the climax of my success.
view, was noticeably less well attended than the first, for the very obvious
reason, as I thought, that the ballet occurred in the first part. My brother
Julius, who had come over from Leipzig for one of the performances of
Rienzi, gave me a still more naive testimony as to the real point of interest
in the opera. I was sitting with him in an open box, in full sight of the
audience, and had therefore begged him to desist from giving any applause,
even if directed only to the efforts of the singers; he restrained himself all
through the evening, but his enthusiasm at a certain figure of the ballet was
too much for him, and he clapped loudly, to the great amusement of the
audience, telling me that he could not hold himself in any longer. Curiously
enough, this same ballet secured for Rienzi, which was otherwise received
with indifference, the enduring preference of the present King of Prussia,[11]
who many years afterwards ordered the revival of this opera, although it
had utterly failed in arousing public interest by its merits as a drama.
[11] William the First.
I found, when I had to be present later on at a representation of the same
opera at Darmstadt, that while wholesale cuts had to be made in its best
parts, it had been found necessary to expand the ballets by additions and
repetitions. This ballet music, which I had put together with contemptuous
haste at Riga in a few days without any inspiration, seemed to me,
moreover, so strikingly weak that I was thoroughly ashamed of it even in
those days at Dresden, when I had found myself compelled to suppress its
best feature, the tragic pantomime. Further, the resources of the ballet in
Dresden did not even admit of the execution of my stage directions for the
combat in the arena, nor for the very significant round dances, both
admirably carried out at a later date in Berlin. I had to be content with the
humiliating substitution of a long, foolish step-dance by two insignificant
dancers, which was ended by a company of soldiers marching on, bearing
their shields on high so as to form a roof and remind the audience of the
Roman testudo; then the ballet-master with his assistant, in flesh-coloured
tights, leaped on to the shields and turned somersaults, a proceeding which
they thought was reminiscent of the gladiatorial games. It was at this point
that the house was always moved to resounding applause, and I had to own
that this moment marked the climax of my success.
Page 274
I thus had my doubts as to the intrinsic divergence between my inner
aims and my outward success; at the same time a decisive and fatal change
in my fortunes was brought about by my acceptance of the conductorship at
Dresden, under circumstances as perplexing in their way as those preceding
my marriage. I had met the negotiations which led up to this appointment
with a hesitation and a coolness by no means affected. I felt nothing but
scorn for theatrical life; a scorn that was by no means lessened by a closer
acquaintance with the apparently distinguished ruling body of a court
theatre, the splendours of which only conceal, with arrogant ignorance, the
humiliating conditions appertaining to it and to the modern theatre in
general. I saw every noble impulse stifled in those occupied with theatrical
matters, and a combination of the vainest and most frivolous interests
maintained by a ridiculously rigid and bureaucratic system; I was now fully
convinced that the necessity of handling the business of the theatre would
be the most distasteful thing I could imagine. Now that, through Rastrelli’s
death, the temptation to be false to my inner conviction came to me in
Dresden, I explained to my old and trusted friends that I did not think I
should accept the vacant post.
But everything calculated to shake human resolution combined against
this decision. The prospect of securing the means of livelihood through a
permanent position with a fixed salary was an irresistible attraction. I
combated the temptation by reminding myself of my success as an operatic
composer, which might reasonably be expected to bring in enough to supply
my moderate requirements in a lodging of two rooms, where I could
proceed undisturbed with fresh compositions. I was told in answer to this
that my work itself would be better served by a fixed position without
arduous duties, as for a whole year since the completion of the Fliegender
Holländer I had not, under existing circumstances, found any leisure at all
for composition. I still remained convinced that Rastrelli’s post of musical
director, in subordination to the conductor, was unworthy of me, and I
declined to entertain the proposal, thus leaving the management to look
elsewhere for some one to fill the vacancy.
There was therefore no further question of this particular post, but I was
then informed that the death of Morlacchi had left vacant a court
conductorship, and it was thought that the King would be willing to offer
me the post. My wife was very much excited at this prospect, for in
Germany the greatest value is laid on these court appointments, which are
aims and my outward success; at the same time a decisive and fatal change
in my fortunes was brought about by my acceptance of the conductorship at
Dresden, under circumstances as perplexing in their way as those preceding
my marriage. I had met the negotiations which led up to this appointment
with a hesitation and a coolness by no means affected. I felt nothing but
scorn for theatrical life; a scorn that was by no means lessened by a closer
acquaintance with the apparently distinguished ruling body of a court
theatre, the splendours of which only conceal, with arrogant ignorance, the
humiliating conditions appertaining to it and to the modern theatre in
general. I saw every noble impulse stifled in those occupied with theatrical
matters, and a combination of the vainest and most frivolous interests
maintained by a ridiculously rigid and bureaucratic system; I was now fully
convinced that the necessity of handling the business of the theatre would
be the most distasteful thing I could imagine. Now that, through Rastrelli’s
death, the temptation to be false to my inner conviction came to me in
Dresden, I explained to my old and trusted friends that I did not think I
should accept the vacant post.
But everything calculated to shake human resolution combined against
this decision. The prospect of securing the means of livelihood through a
permanent position with a fixed salary was an irresistible attraction. I
combated the temptation by reminding myself of my success as an operatic
composer, which might reasonably be expected to bring in enough to supply
my moderate requirements in a lodging of two rooms, where I could
proceed undisturbed with fresh compositions. I was told in answer to this
that my work itself would be better served by a fixed position without
arduous duties, as for a whole year since the completion of the Fliegender
Holländer I had not, under existing circumstances, found any leisure at all
for composition. I still remained convinced that Rastrelli’s post of musical
director, in subordination to the conductor, was unworthy of me, and I
declined to entertain the proposal, thus leaving the management to look
elsewhere for some one to fill the vacancy.
There was therefore no further question of this particular post, but I was
then informed that the death of Morlacchi had left vacant a court
conductorship, and it was thought that the King would be willing to offer
me the post. My wife was very much excited at this prospect, for in
Germany the greatest value is laid on these court appointments, which are
Page 275
tenable for life, and the dazzling respectability pertaining to them is held
out to German musicians as the acme of earthly happiness. The offer
opened up for us in many directions the prospect of friendly relations in a
society which had hitherto been outside our experience. Domestic comfort
and social prestige were very alluring to the homeless wanderers who, in
bygone days of misery, had often longed for the comfort and security of an
assured and permanent position such as was now open to them under the
august protection of the court. The influence of Caroline von Weber did
much in the long-run to weaken my opposition. I was often at her house,
and took great pleasure in her society, which brought back to my mind very
vividly the personality of my still dearly beloved master. She begged me
with really touching tenderness not to withstand this obvious command of
fate, and asserted her right to ask me to settle in Dresden, to fill the place
left sadly empty by her husband’s death. ‘Just think,’ she said, ‘how can I
look Weber in the face again when I join him if I have to tell him that the
work for which he made such devoted sacrifices in Dresden is neglected;
just imagine my feelings when I see that indolent Reissiger stand in my
noble Weber’s place, and when I hear his operas produced more
mechanically every year. If you loved Weber, you owe it to his memory to
step into his place and to continue his work.’ As an experienced woman of
the world she also pointed out energetically and prudently the practical side
of the matter, impressing on me the duty of thinking of my wife, who
would, in case of my death, be sufficiently provided for if I accepted the
post.
The promptings of affection, prudence and good sense, however, had less
weight with me than the enthusiastic conviction, never at any period of my
life entirely destroyed, that wherever fate led me, whether to Dresden or
elsewhere, I should find the opportunity which would convert my dreams
into reality through currents set in motion by some change in the everyday
order of events. All that was needed for this was the advent of an ardent and
aspiring soul who, with good luck to back him, might make up for lost time,
and by his ennobling influence achieve the deliverance of art from her
shameful bonds. The wonderful and rapid change which had taken place in
my fortunes could not fail to encourage such a hope, and I was seduced on
perceiving the marked alteration that had taken place in the whole attitude
of Lüttichau, the general director, towards me. This strange individual
showed me a kindliness of which no one would hitherto have thought him
out to German musicians as the acme of earthly happiness. The offer
opened up for us in many directions the prospect of friendly relations in a
society which had hitherto been outside our experience. Domestic comfort
and social prestige were very alluring to the homeless wanderers who, in
bygone days of misery, had often longed for the comfort and security of an
assured and permanent position such as was now open to them under the
august protection of the court. The influence of Caroline von Weber did
much in the long-run to weaken my opposition. I was often at her house,
and took great pleasure in her society, which brought back to my mind very
vividly the personality of my still dearly beloved master. She begged me
with really touching tenderness not to withstand this obvious command of
fate, and asserted her right to ask me to settle in Dresden, to fill the place
left sadly empty by her husband’s death. ‘Just think,’ she said, ‘how can I
look Weber in the face again when I join him if I have to tell him that the
work for which he made such devoted sacrifices in Dresden is neglected;
just imagine my feelings when I see that indolent Reissiger stand in my
noble Weber’s place, and when I hear his operas produced more
mechanically every year. If you loved Weber, you owe it to his memory to
step into his place and to continue his work.’ As an experienced woman of
the world she also pointed out energetically and prudently the practical side
of the matter, impressing on me the duty of thinking of my wife, who
would, in case of my death, be sufficiently provided for if I accepted the
post.
The promptings of affection, prudence and good sense, however, had less
weight with me than the enthusiastic conviction, never at any period of my
life entirely destroyed, that wherever fate led me, whether to Dresden or
elsewhere, I should find the opportunity which would convert my dreams
into reality through currents set in motion by some change in the everyday
order of events. All that was needed for this was the advent of an ardent and
aspiring soul who, with good luck to back him, might make up for lost time,
and by his ennobling influence achieve the deliverance of art from her
shameful bonds. The wonderful and rapid change which had taken place in
my fortunes could not fail to encourage such a hope, and I was seduced on
perceiving the marked alteration that had taken place in the whole attitude
of Lüttichau, the general director, towards me. This strange individual
showed me a kindliness of which no one would hitherto have thought him
Page 276
capable, and that he was prompted by a genuine feeling of personal
benevolence towards me I could not help being absolutely convinced, even
at the time of my subsequent ceaseless differences with him.
Nevertheless, the decision came as a kind of surprise. On 2nd February
1843 I was very politely invited to the director’s office, and there met the
general staff of the royal orchestra, in whose presence Lüttichau, through
the medium of my never-to-be-forgotten friend Winkler, solemnly read out
to me a royal rescript appointing me forthwith conductor to his Majesty,
with a life salary of four thousand five hundred marks a year. Lüttichau
followed the reading of this document by a more or less ceremonious
speech, in which he assumed that I should gratefully accept the King’s
favour. At this polite ceremony it did not escape my notice that all
possibility of future negotiations over the figure of the salary was cut off;
on the other hand, a substantial exemption in my favour, the omission of the
condition, enforced even on Weber in his time, of serving a year’s probation
under the title of mere musical director, was calculated to secure my
unconditional acceptance. My new colleagues congratulated me, and
Lüttichau accompanied me with the politest phrases to my own door, where
I fell into the arms of my poor wife, who was giddy with delight. Therefore
I fully realised that I must put the best face I could on the matter, and unless
I wished to give unheard-of offence, I must even congratulate myself on my
appointment as royal conductor.
A few days after taking the oath as a servant of the King in solemn
session, and undergoing the ceremony of presentation to the assembled
orchestra by means of an enthusiastic speech from the general director, I
was summoned to an audience with his Majesty. When I saw the features of
the kind, courteous, and homely monarch, I involuntarily thought of my
youthful attempt at a political overture on the theme of Friedrich und
Freiheit. Our somewhat embarrassed conversation brightened with the
King’s expression of his satisfaction with those two of my operas which had
been performed in Dresden. He expressed with polite hesitation his feeling
that if my operas left anything to be desired, it was a clearer definition of
the various characters in my musical dramas. He thought the interest in the
persons was overpowered by the elemental forces figuring beside them—in
Hienzi the mob, in the Fliegender Holländer the sea. I thought I understood
his meaning perfectly, and this proof of his sincere sympathy and original
judgment pleased me very much. He also made his excuses in advance for a
benevolence towards me I could not help being absolutely convinced, even
at the time of my subsequent ceaseless differences with him.
Nevertheless, the decision came as a kind of surprise. On 2nd February
1843 I was very politely invited to the director’s office, and there met the
general staff of the royal orchestra, in whose presence Lüttichau, through
the medium of my never-to-be-forgotten friend Winkler, solemnly read out
to me a royal rescript appointing me forthwith conductor to his Majesty,
with a life salary of four thousand five hundred marks a year. Lüttichau
followed the reading of this document by a more or less ceremonious
speech, in which he assumed that I should gratefully accept the King’s
favour. At this polite ceremony it did not escape my notice that all
possibility of future negotiations over the figure of the salary was cut off;
on the other hand, a substantial exemption in my favour, the omission of the
condition, enforced even on Weber in his time, of serving a year’s probation
under the title of mere musical director, was calculated to secure my
unconditional acceptance. My new colleagues congratulated me, and
Lüttichau accompanied me with the politest phrases to my own door, where
I fell into the arms of my poor wife, who was giddy with delight. Therefore
I fully realised that I must put the best face I could on the matter, and unless
I wished to give unheard-of offence, I must even congratulate myself on my
appointment as royal conductor.
A few days after taking the oath as a servant of the King in solemn
session, and undergoing the ceremony of presentation to the assembled
orchestra by means of an enthusiastic speech from the general director, I
was summoned to an audience with his Majesty. When I saw the features of
the kind, courteous, and homely monarch, I involuntarily thought of my
youthful attempt at a political overture on the theme of Friedrich und
Freiheit. Our somewhat embarrassed conversation brightened with the
King’s expression of his satisfaction with those two of my operas which had
been performed in Dresden. He expressed with polite hesitation his feeling
that if my operas left anything to be desired, it was a clearer definition of
the various characters in my musical dramas. He thought the interest in the
persons was overpowered by the elemental forces figuring beside them—in
Hienzi the mob, in the Fliegender Holländer the sea. I thought I understood
his meaning perfectly, and this proof of his sincere sympathy and original
judgment pleased me very much. He also made his excuses in advance for a
Page 277
possible rare attendance at my operas on his part, his sole reason for this
being that he had a peculiar aversion from theatre-going, as the result of one
of the rules of his early training, under which he and his brother John, who
had acquired a similar aversion, were for a long time compelled regularly to
attend the theatre, when he, to tell the truth, would often have preferred to
be left alone to follow his own pursuits independent of etiquette.
As a characteristic instance of the courtier spirit, I afterwards learned that
Lüttichau, who had had to wait for me in the anteroom during this audience,
had been very much put out by its long duration. In the whole course of my
life I was only admitted twice more to personal intercourse and speech with
the good King. The first occasion was when I presented him with the
dedication copy of the pianoforte score of my Rienzi; and the second was
after my very successful arrangement and performance of the Iphigenia in
Aulis, by Gluck, of whose operas he was particularly fond, when he stopped
me in the public promenade and congratulated me on my work.
That first audience with the King marked the zenith of my hastily
adopted career at Dresden; thenceforward anxiety reasserted itself in
manifold ways. I very quickly realised the difficulties of my material
situation, since it soon became evident that the advantage won by new
exertions and my present appointment bore no proportion to the heavy
sacrifices and obligations which I incurred as soon as I entered on an
independent career. The young musical director of Riga, long since
forgotten, suddenly reappeared in an astonishing reincarnation as royal
conductor to the King of Saxony. The first-fruits of the universal estimate of
my good fortune took the shape of pressing creditors and threats of
prosecution; next followed demands from the Königsberg tradesmen, from
whom I had escaped from Riga by means of that horribly wretched and
miserable flight. I also heard from people in the most distant parts, who
thought they had some claim on me, dating even from my student, nay, my
school days, until at last I cried out in my astonishment that I expected to
receive a bill next from the nurse who had suckled me. All this did not
amount to any very large sum, and I merely mention it because of the ill-
natured rumours which, I learned years later, had been spread abroad about
the extent of my debts at that time. Out of three thousand marks, borrowed
at interest from Schroder-Devrient, I not only paid these debts, but also
fully compensated the sacrifices which Kietz had made on my behalf,
without ever expecting any return, in the days of my poverty in Paris. I was,
being that he had a peculiar aversion from theatre-going, as the result of one
of the rules of his early training, under which he and his brother John, who
had acquired a similar aversion, were for a long time compelled regularly to
attend the theatre, when he, to tell the truth, would often have preferred to
be left alone to follow his own pursuits independent of etiquette.
As a characteristic instance of the courtier spirit, I afterwards learned that
Lüttichau, who had had to wait for me in the anteroom during this audience,
had been very much put out by its long duration. In the whole course of my
life I was only admitted twice more to personal intercourse and speech with
the good King. The first occasion was when I presented him with the
dedication copy of the pianoforte score of my Rienzi; and the second was
after my very successful arrangement and performance of the Iphigenia in
Aulis, by Gluck, of whose operas he was particularly fond, when he stopped
me in the public promenade and congratulated me on my work.
That first audience with the King marked the zenith of my hastily
adopted career at Dresden; thenceforward anxiety reasserted itself in
manifold ways. I very quickly realised the difficulties of my material
situation, since it soon became evident that the advantage won by new
exertions and my present appointment bore no proportion to the heavy
sacrifices and obligations which I incurred as soon as I entered on an
independent career. The young musical director of Riga, long since
forgotten, suddenly reappeared in an astonishing reincarnation as royal
conductor to the King of Saxony. The first-fruits of the universal estimate of
my good fortune took the shape of pressing creditors and threats of
prosecution; next followed demands from the Königsberg tradesmen, from
whom I had escaped from Riga by means of that horribly wretched and
miserable flight. I also heard from people in the most distant parts, who
thought they had some claim on me, dating even from my student, nay, my
school days, until at last I cried out in my astonishment that I expected to
receive a bill next from the nurse who had suckled me. All this did not
amount to any very large sum, and I merely mention it because of the ill-
natured rumours which, I learned years later, had been spread abroad about
the extent of my debts at that time. Out of three thousand marks, borrowed
at interest from Schroder-Devrient, I not only paid these debts, but also
fully compensated the sacrifices which Kietz had made on my behalf,
without ever expecting any return, in the days of my poverty in Paris. I was,
Page 278
moreover, able to be of practical use to him. But where was I to find even
this sum, as my distress had hitherto been so great that I was obliged to urge
Schroder-Devrient to hurry on the rehearsals of the Fliegender Holländer by
pointing out to her the enormous importance to me of the fee for the
performance? I had no allowance for the expenses of my establishment in
Dresden, though it had to be suitable for my position as royal conductor,
nor even for the purchase of a ridiculous and expensive court uniform, so
that there would have been no possibility of my making a start at all, as I
had no private means, unless I borrowed money at interest.
But no one who knew of the extraordinary success of Rienzi at Dresden
could help believing in an immediate and remunerative rage for my operas
on the German stage. My own relatives, even the prudent Ottilie, were so
convinced of it that they thought I might safely count on at least doubling
my salary by the receipts from my operas. At the very beginning the
prospects did indeed seem bright; the score of my Fliegender Holländer was
ordered by the Royal Theatre at Cassel and by the Riga theatre, which I had
known so well in the old days, because they were anxious to perform
something of mine at an early date, and had heard that this opera was on a
smaller scale, and made smaller demands on the stage management, than
Rienzi. In May, 1843 I heard good reports of the success of the
performances from both those places. But this was all for the time being,
and a whole year went by without the smallest inquiry for any of my scores.
An attempt was made to secure me some benefit by the publication of the
pianoforte score of the Fliegender Holländer, as I wanted to reserve Rienzi,
after the successes it had gained, as useful capital for a more favourable
opportunity; but the plan was spoilt by the opposition of Messrs. Hartel of
Leipzig, who, although ready enough to publish my opera, would only do
so on the condition that I abstained from asking any payment for it.
So I had, for the present, to content myself with the moral satisfaction of
my successes, of which my unmistakable popularity with the Dresden
public, and the respect and attention paid to me, formed part. But even in
this respect my Utopian dreams were destined to be disturbed. I think that
my appearance at Dresden marked the beginning of a new era in journalism
and criticism, which found food for its hitherto but slightly developed
vitality in its vexation at my success. The two gentlemen I have already
mentioned, C. Bank and J. Schladebach, had, as I now know, first taken up
their regular abode in Dresden at that time; I know that when difficulties
this sum, as my distress had hitherto been so great that I was obliged to urge
Schroder-Devrient to hurry on the rehearsals of the Fliegender Holländer by
pointing out to her the enormous importance to me of the fee for the
performance? I had no allowance for the expenses of my establishment in
Dresden, though it had to be suitable for my position as royal conductor,
nor even for the purchase of a ridiculous and expensive court uniform, so
that there would have been no possibility of my making a start at all, as I
had no private means, unless I borrowed money at interest.
But no one who knew of the extraordinary success of Rienzi at Dresden
could help believing in an immediate and remunerative rage for my operas
on the German stage. My own relatives, even the prudent Ottilie, were so
convinced of it that they thought I might safely count on at least doubling
my salary by the receipts from my operas. At the very beginning the
prospects did indeed seem bright; the score of my Fliegender Holländer was
ordered by the Royal Theatre at Cassel and by the Riga theatre, which I had
known so well in the old days, because they were anxious to perform
something of mine at an early date, and had heard that this opera was on a
smaller scale, and made smaller demands on the stage management, than
Rienzi. In May, 1843 I heard good reports of the success of the
performances from both those places. But this was all for the time being,
and a whole year went by without the smallest inquiry for any of my scores.
An attempt was made to secure me some benefit by the publication of the
pianoforte score of the Fliegender Holländer, as I wanted to reserve Rienzi,
after the successes it had gained, as useful capital for a more favourable
opportunity; but the plan was spoilt by the opposition of Messrs. Hartel of
Leipzig, who, although ready enough to publish my opera, would only do
so on the condition that I abstained from asking any payment for it.
So I had, for the present, to content myself with the moral satisfaction of
my successes, of which my unmistakable popularity with the Dresden
public, and the respect and attention paid to me, formed part. But even in
this respect my Utopian dreams were destined to be disturbed. I think that
my appearance at Dresden marked the beginning of a new era in journalism
and criticism, which found food for its hitherto but slightly developed
vitality in its vexation at my success. The two gentlemen I have already
mentioned, C. Bank and J. Schladebach, had, as I now know, first taken up
their regular abode in Dresden at that time; I know that when difficulties
Page 279
were raised about the permanence of Bank’s appointment, they were
waived, owing to the testimonials and recommendation of my present
colleague Reissiger. The success of my Rienzi had been the source of great
annoyance to these gentlemen, who were now established as musical critics
to the Dresden press, because I made no effort to win their favour; they
were not ill-pleased, therefore, to find an opportunity of pouring out the
vitriol of their hatred over the universally popular young musician who had
won the sympathy of the kindly public, partly on account of the poverty and
ill-luck which had hitherto been his lot. The need for any kind of human
consideration had suddenly vanished with my ‘unheard-of’ appointment to
the royal conductorship. Now ‘all was well with me,’ ‘too well,’ in fact; and
envy found its congenial food; this provided a perfectly clear and
comprehensible point of attack; and soon there spread through the German
press, in the columns given to Dresden news, an estimate of me which has
never fundamentally changed, except in one point, to this day. This single
modification, which was purely temporary and confined to papers of one
political colour, occurred on my first settlement as a political refugee in
Switzerland, but lasted only until, through Liszt’s exertions, my operas
began to be produced all over Germany, in spite of my exile. The orders
from two theatres, immediately after the Dresden performance, for one of
my scores, were merely due to the fact that up to that time the activity of
my journalistic critics was still limited. I put down the cessation of all
inquiries, certainly not without due justification, mainly to the effect of the
false and calumnious reports in the papers.
My old friend Laube tried, indeed, to undertake my defence in the press.
On New Year’s Day, 1843 he resumed the editorship of the Zeitung fur die
Elegante Welt, and asked me to provide him with a biographical notice of
myself for the first number. It evidently gave him great pleasure to present
me thus in triumph to the literary world, and in order to give the subject
more prominence he added a supplement to that number in the shape of a
lithograph reproduction of my portrait by Kietz. But after a time even he
became anxious and confused in his judgment of my works, when he saw
the systematic and increasingly virulent detraction, depreciation, and scorn
to which they were subjected. He confessed to me later that he had never
imagined such a desperate position as mine against the united forces of
journalism could possibly exist, and when he heard my view of the
question, he smiled and gave me his blessing, as though I were a lost soul.
waived, owing to the testimonials and recommendation of my present
colleague Reissiger. The success of my Rienzi had been the source of great
annoyance to these gentlemen, who were now established as musical critics
to the Dresden press, because I made no effort to win their favour; they
were not ill-pleased, therefore, to find an opportunity of pouring out the
vitriol of their hatred over the universally popular young musician who had
won the sympathy of the kindly public, partly on account of the poverty and
ill-luck which had hitherto been his lot. The need for any kind of human
consideration had suddenly vanished with my ‘unheard-of’ appointment to
the royal conductorship. Now ‘all was well with me,’ ‘too well,’ in fact; and
envy found its congenial food; this provided a perfectly clear and
comprehensible point of attack; and soon there spread through the German
press, in the columns given to Dresden news, an estimate of me which has
never fundamentally changed, except in one point, to this day. This single
modification, which was purely temporary and confined to papers of one
political colour, occurred on my first settlement as a political refugee in
Switzerland, but lasted only until, through Liszt’s exertions, my operas
began to be produced all over Germany, in spite of my exile. The orders
from two theatres, immediately after the Dresden performance, for one of
my scores, were merely due to the fact that up to that time the activity of
my journalistic critics was still limited. I put down the cessation of all
inquiries, certainly not without due justification, mainly to the effect of the
false and calumnious reports in the papers.
My old friend Laube tried, indeed, to undertake my defence in the press.
On New Year’s Day, 1843 he resumed the editorship of the Zeitung fur die
Elegante Welt, and asked me to provide him with a biographical notice of
myself for the first number. It evidently gave him great pleasure to present
me thus in triumph to the literary world, and in order to give the subject
more prominence he added a supplement to that number in the shape of a
lithograph reproduction of my portrait by Kietz. But after a time even he
became anxious and confused in his judgment of my works, when he saw
the systematic and increasingly virulent detraction, depreciation, and scorn
to which they were subjected. He confessed to me later that he had never
imagined such a desperate position as mine against the united forces of
journalism could possibly exist, and when he heard my view of the
question, he smiled and gave me his blessing, as though I were a lost soul.
Page 280
Moreover, a change was observable in the attitude of those immediately
connected with me in my work, and this provided very acceptable material
for the journalistic campaign. I had been led, though by no ambitious
impulse, to ask to be allowed to conduct the performances of my own
works. I found that at every performance of Rienzi Reissiger became more
negligent in his conducting, and that the whole production was slipping
back into the old familiar, expressionless, and humdrum performance; and
as my appointment was already mooted, I had asked permission to conduct
the sixth performance of my work in person. I conducted without having
held a single rehearsal, and without any previous experience, at the head of
the Dresden orchestra. The performance went splendidly; singers and
orchestra were inspired with new life, and everybody was obliged to admit
that this was the finest performance of Rienzi that had yet been given. The
rehearsing and con-ducting of the Fliegender Holländer were willingly
handed over to me, because Reissiger was overwhelmed with work, in
consequence of the death of the musical director, Rastrelli. In addition to
this I was asked to conduct Weber’s Euryanthe, by way of providing a
direct proof of my capacity to interpret scores other than my own.
Apparently everybody was pleased, and it was the tone of this performance
that made Weber’s widow so anxious that I should accept the Dresden
conductorship; she declared that for the first time since her husband’s death
she had heard his work correctly interpreted, both in expression and time.
Thereupon, Reissiger, who would have preferred to have a musical
director under him, but had received instead a colleague on an equal
footing, felt himself aggrieved by my appointment. Though his own
indolence would have inclined him to the side of peace and a good
understanding with me, his ambitious wife took care to stir up his fear of
me. This never led to an openly hostile attitude on his part, but I noticed
certain indiscretions in the press from that time onwards, which showed me
that the friendliness of my colleague, who never talked to me without first
embracing me, was not of the most honourable type.
I also received a quite unexpected proof that I had attracted the bitter
envy of another man whose sentiments I had no reason to suspect. This was
Karl Lipinsky, a celebrated violinist in his day, who had for many years led
the Dresden orchestra. He was a man of ardent temperament and original
talent, but of incredible vanity, which his emotional, suspicious Polish
temperament rendered dangerous. I always found him annoying, because
connected with me in my work, and this provided very acceptable material
for the journalistic campaign. I had been led, though by no ambitious
impulse, to ask to be allowed to conduct the performances of my own
works. I found that at every performance of Rienzi Reissiger became more
negligent in his conducting, and that the whole production was slipping
back into the old familiar, expressionless, and humdrum performance; and
as my appointment was already mooted, I had asked permission to conduct
the sixth performance of my work in person. I conducted without having
held a single rehearsal, and without any previous experience, at the head of
the Dresden orchestra. The performance went splendidly; singers and
orchestra were inspired with new life, and everybody was obliged to admit
that this was the finest performance of Rienzi that had yet been given. The
rehearsing and con-ducting of the Fliegender Holländer were willingly
handed over to me, because Reissiger was overwhelmed with work, in
consequence of the death of the musical director, Rastrelli. In addition to
this I was asked to conduct Weber’s Euryanthe, by way of providing a
direct proof of my capacity to interpret scores other than my own.
Apparently everybody was pleased, and it was the tone of this performance
that made Weber’s widow so anxious that I should accept the Dresden
conductorship; she declared that for the first time since her husband’s death
she had heard his work correctly interpreted, both in expression and time.
Thereupon, Reissiger, who would have preferred to have a musical
director under him, but had received instead a colleague on an equal
footing, felt himself aggrieved by my appointment. Though his own
indolence would have inclined him to the side of peace and a good
understanding with me, his ambitious wife took care to stir up his fear of
me. This never led to an openly hostile attitude on his part, but I noticed
certain indiscretions in the press from that time onwards, which showed me
that the friendliness of my colleague, who never talked to me without first
embracing me, was not of the most honourable type.
I also received a quite unexpected proof that I had attracted the bitter
envy of another man whose sentiments I had no reason to suspect. This was
Karl Lipinsky, a celebrated violinist in his day, who had for many years led
the Dresden orchestra. He was a man of ardent temperament and original
talent, but of incredible vanity, which his emotional, suspicious Polish
temperament rendered dangerous. I always found him annoying, because
Page 281
however inspiring and instructive his playing was as to the technical
execution of the violinists, he was certainly ill-fitted to be the leader of a
first-class orchestra. This extraordinary person tried to justify Director
Lüttichau’s praise of his playing, which could always be heard above the
rest of the orchestra; he came in a little before the other violins; he was a
leader in a double sense, as he was always a little ahead. He acted in much
the same way with regard to expression, marking his slight variations in the
piano passages with fanatical precision. It was useless to talk to him about
it, as nothing but the most skilful flattery had any effect on him. So I had to
endure it as best I could, and to think out ways and means of diminishing its
ill effects on the orchestral performances as a whole by having recourse to
the most polite circumlocutions. Even so he could not endure the higher
estimation in which the performances of the orchestra under my
conductorship were held, because he thought that the playing of an
orchestra in which he was the leader must invariably be excellent, whoever
stood at the conductor’s desk. Now it happened, as is always the case when
a new man with fresh ideas is installed in office, that the members of the
orchestra came to me with the most varied suggestions for improvements
which had hitherto been neglected; and Lipinsky, who was already annoyed
about this, turned a certain case of this kind to a peculiarly treacherous use.
One of the oldest contrabassists had died. Lipinsky urged me to arrange that
the post should not be filled in the usual way by promotion from the ranks
of our own orchestra, but should be given, on his recommendation, to a
distinguished and skilful contrabassist from Darmstadt named Muller.
When the musician whose rights of seniority were thus threatened, appealed
to me, I kept my promise to Lipinsky, explained my views about the abuses
of promotion by seniority, and declared that, in accordance with my sworn
oath to the King, I held it my paramount duty to consider the maintenance
of the artistic interests of the institution before everything else. I then found
to my great astonishment, though it was foolish of me to be surprised, that
the whole of the orchestra turned upon me as one man, and when the
occasion arose for a discussion between Lipinsky and myself as to his own
numerous grievances, he actually accused me of having threatened, by my
remarks in the contrabassist case, to undermine the well-established rights
of the members of the orchestra, whose welfare it was my duty to protect.
Lüttichau, who was on the point of absenting himself from Dresden for
some time, was extremely uneasy, as Reissiger was away on his holiday, at
execution of the violinists, he was certainly ill-fitted to be the leader of a
first-class orchestra. This extraordinary person tried to justify Director
Lüttichau’s praise of his playing, which could always be heard above the
rest of the orchestra; he came in a little before the other violins; he was a
leader in a double sense, as he was always a little ahead. He acted in much
the same way with regard to expression, marking his slight variations in the
piano passages with fanatical precision. It was useless to talk to him about
it, as nothing but the most skilful flattery had any effect on him. So I had to
endure it as best I could, and to think out ways and means of diminishing its
ill effects on the orchestral performances as a whole by having recourse to
the most polite circumlocutions. Even so he could not endure the higher
estimation in which the performances of the orchestra under my
conductorship were held, because he thought that the playing of an
orchestra in which he was the leader must invariably be excellent, whoever
stood at the conductor’s desk. Now it happened, as is always the case when
a new man with fresh ideas is installed in office, that the members of the
orchestra came to me with the most varied suggestions for improvements
which had hitherto been neglected; and Lipinsky, who was already annoyed
about this, turned a certain case of this kind to a peculiarly treacherous use.
One of the oldest contrabassists had died. Lipinsky urged me to arrange that
the post should not be filled in the usual way by promotion from the ranks
of our own orchestra, but should be given, on his recommendation, to a
distinguished and skilful contrabassist from Darmstadt named Muller.
When the musician whose rights of seniority were thus threatened, appealed
to me, I kept my promise to Lipinsky, explained my views about the abuses
of promotion by seniority, and declared that, in accordance with my sworn
oath to the King, I held it my paramount duty to consider the maintenance
of the artistic interests of the institution before everything else. I then found
to my great astonishment, though it was foolish of me to be surprised, that
the whole of the orchestra turned upon me as one man, and when the
occasion arose for a discussion between Lipinsky and myself as to his own
numerous grievances, he actually accused me of having threatened, by my
remarks in the contrabassist case, to undermine the well-established rights
of the members of the orchestra, whose welfare it was my duty to protect.
Lüttichau, who was on the point of absenting himself from Dresden for
some time, was extremely uneasy, as Reissiger was away on his holiday, at
Page 282
leaving musical affairs in such a dangerous state of unrest. The deceit and
impudence of which I had been the victim was a revelation to me, and I
gathered from this experience the calm sense necessary to set the harassed
director at ease by the most conclusive assurances that I understood the
people with whom I had to deal, and would act accordingly. I faithfully kept
my word, and never again came into collision either with Lipinsky or any
other member of the orchestra. On the contrary, all the musicians were soon
so firmly attached to me that I could always pride myself on their devotion.
From that day forward, however, one thing at least was certain, namely,
that I should not die as conductor at Dresden. My post and my work at
Dresden thenceforward became a burden, of which the occasionally
excellent results of my efforts made me all the more sensible.
My position at Dresden, however, brought me one friend whose intimate
relations with me long survived our artistic collaboration in Dresden. A
musical director was assigned to each conductor; he had to be a musician of
repute, a hard worker, adaptable, and, above all, a Catholic, for the two
conductors were Protestants, a cause of much annoyance to the clergy of the
Catholic cathedral, numerous positions in which had to be filled from the
orchestra. August Röckel, a nephew of Hummel, who sent in his application
for this position from Weimar, furnished evidence of his suitability under all
these heads. He belonged to an old Bavarian family; his father was a singer,
and had sung the part of Florestan at the time of the first production of
Beethoven’s Fidelio, and had himself remained on terms on close intimacy
with the Master, many details about whose life have been preserved through
his care. His subsequent position as a teacher of singing led him to take up
theatrical management, and he introduced German opera to the Parisians
with so much success, that the credit for the popularity of Fidelio and Der
Freischutz with French audiences, to whom these works were quite
unknown, must be awarded to his admirable enterprise, which was also
responsible for Schroder-Devrient’s debut in Paris. August Röckel, his son,
who was still a young man, by helping his father in these and similar
undertakings, had gained practical experience as a musician. As his father’s
business had for some time even extended to England, August had won
practical knowledge of all sorts by contact with many men and things, and
in addition had learned French and English. But music had remained his
chosen vocation, and his great natural talent justified the highest hopes of
success. He was an excellent pianist, read scores with the utmost ease,
impudence of which I had been the victim was a revelation to me, and I
gathered from this experience the calm sense necessary to set the harassed
director at ease by the most conclusive assurances that I understood the
people with whom I had to deal, and would act accordingly. I faithfully kept
my word, and never again came into collision either with Lipinsky or any
other member of the orchestra. On the contrary, all the musicians were soon
so firmly attached to me that I could always pride myself on their devotion.
From that day forward, however, one thing at least was certain, namely,
that I should not die as conductor at Dresden. My post and my work at
Dresden thenceforward became a burden, of which the occasionally
excellent results of my efforts made me all the more sensible.
My position at Dresden, however, brought me one friend whose intimate
relations with me long survived our artistic collaboration in Dresden. A
musical director was assigned to each conductor; he had to be a musician of
repute, a hard worker, adaptable, and, above all, a Catholic, for the two
conductors were Protestants, a cause of much annoyance to the clergy of the
Catholic cathedral, numerous positions in which had to be filled from the
orchestra. August Röckel, a nephew of Hummel, who sent in his application
for this position from Weimar, furnished evidence of his suitability under all
these heads. He belonged to an old Bavarian family; his father was a singer,
and had sung the part of Florestan at the time of the first production of
Beethoven’s Fidelio, and had himself remained on terms on close intimacy
with the Master, many details about whose life have been preserved through
his care. His subsequent position as a teacher of singing led him to take up
theatrical management, and he introduced German opera to the Parisians
with so much success, that the credit for the popularity of Fidelio and Der
Freischutz with French audiences, to whom these works were quite
unknown, must be awarded to his admirable enterprise, which was also
responsible for Schroder-Devrient’s debut in Paris. August Röckel, his son,
who was still a young man, by helping his father in these and similar
undertakings, had gained practical experience as a musician. As his father’s
business had for some time even extended to England, August had won
practical knowledge of all sorts by contact with many men and things, and
in addition had learned French and English. But music had remained his
chosen vocation, and his great natural talent justified the highest hopes of
success. He was an excellent pianist, read scores with the utmost ease,
Page 283
possessed an exceptionally fine ear, and had indeed every qualification for a
practical musician. As a composer he was actuated, not so much by a strong
impulse to create, as the desire to show what he was capable of; the success
at which he aimed was to gain the reputation of a clever operatic composer
rather than recognition as a distinguished musician, and he hoped to obtain
his end by the production of popular works. Actuated by this modest
ambition he had completed an opera, Farinelli, for which he had also
written the libretto, with no other aspiration than that of attaining the same
reputation as his brother-in-law Lortzing.
He brought this score to me, and begged me—it was his first visit before
he had heard one of my operas in Dresden—to play him something from
Rienzi and the Fliegender Holländer. His frank, agreeable personality
induced me to try and meet his wishes as far as I could; and I am convinced
that I soon made such a great and unexpectedly powerful impression on him
that from that moment he determined not to bother me further with the
score of his opera. It was not until we had become more intimate and had
discovered mutual personal interests, that the desire of turning his work to
account induced him to ask me to show my practical friendship by turning
my attention to his score. I made various suggestions as to how it might be
improved, but he was soon so hopelessly disgusted with his own work that
he put it absolutely aside, and never again felt seriously moved to undertake
a similar task. On making a closer acquaintance with my completed operas
and plans for new works, he declared to me that he felt it his vocation to
play the part of spectator, to be my faithful helper and the interpreter of my
new ideas, and, as far as in him lay, to remove entirely, and at all events to
relieve me as far as possible from, all the unpleasantnesses of my official
position and of my dealings with the outside world. He wished, he said, to
avoid placing himself in the ridiculous position of composing operas of his
own while living on terms of close friendship with me.
Nevertheless, I tried to urge him to turn his own talent to account, and to
this end called his attention to several plots which I wished him to work out.
Among these was the idea contained in a small French drama entitled
Cromwell’s Daughter, which was subsequently used as the subject for a
sentimental pastoral romance, and for the elaboration of which I presented
him with an exhaustive plan.
practical musician. As a composer he was actuated, not so much by a strong
impulse to create, as the desire to show what he was capable of; the success
at which he aimed was to gain the reputation of a clever operatic composer
rather than recognition as a distinguished musician, and he hoped to obtain
his end by the production of popular works. Actuated by this modest
ambition he had completed an opera, Farinelli, for which he had also
written the libretto, with no other aspiration than that of attaining the same
reputation as his brother-in-law Lortzing.
He brought this score to me, and begged me—it was his first visit before
he had heard one of my operas in Dresden—to play him something from
Rienzi and the Fliegender Holländer. His frank, agreeable personality
induced me to try and meet his wishes as far as I could; and I am convinced
that I soon made such a great and unexpectedly powerful impression on him
that from that moment he determined not to bother me further with the
score of his opera. It was not until we had become more intimate and had
discovered mutual personal interests, that the desire of turning his work to
account induced him to ask me to show my practical friendship by turning
my attention to his score. I made various suggestions as to how it might be
improved, but he was soon so hopelessly disgusted with his own work that
he put it absolutely aside, and never again felt seriously moved to undertake
a similar task. On making a closer acquaintance with my completed operas
and plans for new works, he declared to me that he felt it his vocation to
play the part of spectator, to be my faithful helper and the interpreter of my
new ideas, and, as far as in him lay, to remove entirely, and at all events to
relieve me as far as possible from, all the unpleasantnesses of my official
position and of my dealings with the outside world. He wished, he said, to
avoid placing himself in the ridiculous position of composing operas of his
own while living on terms of close friendship with me.
Nevertheless, I tried to urge him to turn his own talent to account, and to
this end called his attention to several plots which I wished him to work out.
Among these was the idea contained in a small French drama entitled
Cromwell’s Daughter, which was subsequently used as the subject for a
sentimental pastoral romance, and for the elaboration of which I presented
him with an exhaustive plan.
Page 284
But in the end all my efforts remained fruitless, and it became evident
that his productive talent was feeble. This perhaps arose partly from his
extremely needy and trying domestic circumstances, which were such that
the poor fellow wore himself out to support his wife and numerous growing
children. Indeed, he claimed my help and sympathy in quite another fashion
than by arousing my interest in his artistic development. He was unusually
clear-headed, and possessed a rare capacity for teaching and educating
himself in every branch of knowledge and experience; he was, moreover, so
genuinely true and good-hearted that he soon became my intimate friend
and comrade. He was, and continued to be, the only person who really
appreciated the singular nature of my position towards the surrounding
world, and with whom I could fully and sincerely discuss the cares and
sorrows arising therefrom. What dreadful trials and experiences, what
painful anxieties our common fate was to bring upon us, will soon be seen.
The earlier period of my establishment in Dresden brought me also
another devoted and lifelong friend, though his qualities were such that he
exerted a less decisive influence upon my career. This was a young
physician, named Anton Pusinelli, who lived near me. He seized the
occasion of a serenade sung in honour of my thirtieth birthday by the
Dresden Glee Club to express to me personally his hearty and sincere
attachment. We soon entered upon a quiet friendship from which we
derived a mutual benefit. He became my attentive family doctor, and during
my residence in Dresden, marked as it was by accumulating difficulties, he
had abundant opportunities of helping me. His financial position was very
good, and his ready self-sacrifice enabled him to give me substantial
succour and bound me to him by many heartfelt obligations.
A further development of my association with Dresden buddy was
provided by the kindly advances of Chamberlain von Konneritz’s family.
His wife, Marie von Konneritz (nee Fink), was a friend of Countess Ida
Hahn-Hahn, and expressed her appreciation of my success as a composer
with great warmth, I might almost say, with enthusiasm. I was often invited
to their house, and seemed likely, through this family, to be brought into
touch with the higher aristocracy of Dresden. I merely succeeded in
touching the fringe, however, as we really had nothing in common. True, I
here made the acquaintance of Countess Rossi, the famous Sontag, by
whom, to my genuine astonishment, I was most heartily greeted, and I
thereby obtained the right of afterwards approaching her in Berlin with a
that his productive talent was feeble. This perhaps arose partly from his
extremely needy and trying domestic circumstances, which were such that
the poor fellow wore himself out to support his wife and numerous growing
children. Indeed, he claimed my help and sympathy in quite another fashion
than by arousing my interest in his artistic development. He was unusually
clear-headed, and possessed a rare capacity for teaching and educating
himself in every branch of knowledge and experience; he was, moreover, so
genuinely true and good-hearted that he soon became my intimate friend
and comrade. He was, and continued to be, the only person who really
appreciated the singular nature of my position towards the surrounding
world, and with whom I could fully and sincerely discuss the cares and
sorrows arising therefrom. What dreadful trials and experiences, what
painful anxieties our common fate was to bring upon us, will soon be seen.
The earlier period of my establishment in Dresden brought me also
another devoted and lifelong friend, though his qualities were such that he
exerted a less decisive influence upon my career. This was a young
physician, named Anton Pusinelli, who lived near me. He seized the
occasion of a serenade sung in honour of my thirtieth birthday by the
Dresden Glee Club to express to me personally his hearty and sincere
attachment. We soon entered upon a quiet friendship from which we
derived a mutual benefit. He became my attentive family doctor, and during
my residence in Dresden, marked as it was by accumulating difficulties, he
had abundant opportunities of helping me. His financial position was very
good, and his ready self-sacrifice enabled him to give me substantial
succour and bound me to him by many heartfelt obligations.
A further development of my association with Dresden buddy was
provided by the kindly advances of Chamberlain von Konneritz’s family.
His wife, Marie von Konneritz (nee Fink), was a friend of Countess Ida
Hahn-Hahn, and expressed her appreciation of my success as a composer
with great warmth, I might almost say, with enthusiasm. I was often invited
to their house, and seemed likely, through this family, to be brought into
touch with the higher aristocracy of Dresden. I merely succeeded in
touching the fringe, however, as we really had nothing in common. True, I
here made the acquaintance of Countess Rossi, the famous Sontag, by
whom, to my genuine astonishment, I was most heartily greeted, and I
thereby obtained the right of afterwards approaching her in Berlin with a
Page 285
certain degree of familiarity. The curious way in which I was disillusioned
about this lady on that occasion will be related in due course. I would only
mention here that, through my earlier experiences of the world, I had
become fairly impervious to deception, and my desire for closer
acquaintance with these circles speedily gave way to a complete
hopelessness and an entire lack of ease in their sphere of life.
Although the Konneritz couple remained friendly during the whole of my
prolonged sojourn in Dresden, yet the connection had not the least influence
either upon my development or my position. Only once, on the occasion of
a quarrel between Lüttichau and myself, the former observed that Frau von
Konneritz, by her unmeasured praises, had turned my head and made me
forget my position towards him. But in making this taunt he forgot that, if
any woman in the higher ranks of Dresden society had exerted a real and
invigorating influence upon my inward pride, that woman was his own
wife, Ida von Lüttichau (nee von Knobelsdorf).
The power which this cultured, gentle, and distinguished lady exercised
over my life was of a kind I now experienced for the first time, and might
have become of great importance had I been favoured with more frequent
and intimate intercourse. But it was less her position as wife of the general
director than her constant ill-health and my own peculiar unwillingness to
appear obtrusive, that hindered our meeting, except at rare intervals. My
recollections of her merge somewhat, in my memory, with those of my own
sister Rosalie. I remember the tender ambition which inspired me to win the
encouraging sympathy of this sensitive woman, who was painfully wasting
away amid the coarsest surroundings. My earliest hope for the fulfilment of
this ambition arose from her appreciation of my Fliegender Holländer, in
spite of the fact that, following close upon Rienzi, it had so puzzled the
Dresden public. In this way she was the first, so to speak, who swam
against the tide and met me upon my new path. So deeply was I touched by
this conquest that, when I afterwards published the opera, I dedicated it to
her. In the account of my later years in Dresden I shall have more to record
of the warm sympathy for my new development and dearest artistic aims
for which I was indebted to her. But of real intercourse we had none, and
the character of my Dresden life was not affected by this acquaintance,
otherwise so important in itself.
about this lady on that occasion will be related in due course. I would only
mention here that, through my earlier experiences of the world, I had
become fairly impervious to deception, and my desire for closer
acquaintance with these circles speedily gave way to a complete
hopelessness and an entire lack of ease in their sphere of life.
Although the Konneritz couple remained friendly during the whole of my
prolonged sojourn in Dresden, yet the connection had not the least influence
either upon my development or my position. Only once, on the occasion of
a quarrel between Lüttichau and myself, the former observed that Frau von
Konneritz, by her unmeasured praises, had turned my head and made me
forget my position towards him. But in making this taunt he forgot that, if
any woman in the higher ranks of Dresden society had exerted a real and
invigorating influence upon my inward pride, that woman was his own
wife, Ida von Lüttichau (nee von Knobelsdorf).
The power which this cultured, gentle, and distinguished lady exercised
over my life was of a kind I now experienced for the first time, and might
have become of great importance had I been favoured with more frequent
and intimate intercourse. But it was less her position as wife of the general
director than her constant ill-health and my own peculiar unwillingness to
appear obtrusive, that hindered our meeting, except at rare intervals. My
recollections of her merge somewhat, in my memory, with those of my own
sister Rosalie. I remember the tender ambition which inspired me to win the
encouraging sympathy of this sensitive woman, who was painfully wasting
away amid the coarsest surroundings. My earliest hope for the fulfilment of
this ambition arose from her appreciation of my Fliegender Holländer, in
spite of the fact that, following close upon Rienzi, it had so puzzled the
Dresden public. In this way she was the first, so to speak, who swam
against the tide and met me upon my new path. So deeply was I touched by
this conquest that, when I afterwards published the opera, I dedicated it to
her. In the account of my later years in Dresden I shall have more to record
of the warm sympathy for my new development and dearest artistic aims
for which I was indebted to her. But of real intercourse we had none, and
the character of my Dresden life was not affected by this acquaintance,
otherwise so important in itself.
Page 286
On the other hand, my theatrical acquaintances thrust themselves with
irresistible importunancy into the wide foreground of my life, and in fact,
after my brilliant successes, I was still restricted to the same limited and
familiar sphere in which I had prepared myself for these triumphs. Indeed,
the only one who joined my old friends Heine and Gaffer Fischer was
Tichatschek, with his strange domestic circle. Any one who lived in
Dresden at that time and chanced to know the court lithographer, Furstenau,
will be astonished to hear that, without really being aware of it myself, I
entered into a familiarity that was to prove a lasting one with this man who
was an intimate friend of Tichatschek’s. The importance of this singular
connection may be judged from the fact that my complete withdrawal from
him coincided exactly with the collapse of my civic position in Dresden.
My good-humoured acceptance of election to the musical committee of
the Dresden Glee Club also brought me further chance acquaintances. This
club consisted of a limited number of young merchants and officials, who
had more taste for any kind of convivial entertainment than for music. But
it was seduously kept together by a remarkable and ambitious man,
Professor Lowe, who nursed it with special objects in view, for the
attainment of which he felt the need of an authority such as I possessed at
that time in Dresden.
Among other aims he was particularly and chiefly concerned in arranging
for the transfer of Weber’s remains from London to Dresden. As this project
was one which interested me also, I lent him my support, though he was in
reality merely following the voice of personal ambition. He furthermore
desired, as head of the Glee Club—which, by the way, from the point of
view of music was quite worthless—to invite all the male choral unions of
Saxony to a great gala performance in Dresden. A committee was appointed
for the execution of this plan, and as things soon became pretty warm,
Lowe turned it into a regular revolutionary tribunal, over which, as the great
day of triumph approached, he presided day and night without resting, and
by his furious zeal earned from me the nickname of ‘Robespierre.’
In spite of the fact that I had been placed at the head of this enterprise, I
luckily managed to evade his terrorism, as I was fully occupied with a great
composition promised for the festival. The task had been assigned to me of
writing an important piece for male voices only, which, if possible, should
occupy half an hour. I reflected that the tiresome monotony of male singing,
irresistible importunancy into the wide foreground of my life, and in fact,
after my brilliant successes, I was still restricted to the same limited and
familiar sphere in which I had prepared myself for these triumphs. Indeed,
the only one who joined my old friends Heine and Gaffer Fischer was
Tichatschek, with his strange domestic circle. Any one who lived in
Dresden at that time and chanced to know the court lithographer, Furstenau,
will be astonished to hear that, without really being aware of it myself, I
entered into a familiarity that was to prove a lasting one with this man who
was an intimate friend of Tichatschek’s. The importance of this singular
connection may be judged from the fact that my complete withdrawal from
him coincided exactly with the collapse of my civic position in Dresden.
My good-humoured acceptance of election to the musical committee of
the Dresden Glee Club also brought me further chance acquaintances. This
club consisted of a limited number of young merchants and officials, who
had more taste for any kind of convivial entertainment than for music. But
it was seduously kept together by a remarkable and ambitious man,
Professor Lowe, who nursed it with special objects in view, for the
attainment of which he felt the need of an authority such as I possessed at
that time in Dresden.
Among other aims he was particularly and chiefly concerned in arranging
for the transfer of Weber’s remains from London to Dresden. As this project
was one which interested me also, I lent him my support, though he was in
reality merely following the voice of personal ambition. He furthermore
desired, as head of the Glee Club—which, by the way, from the point of
view of music was quite worthless—to invite all the male choral unions of
Saxony to a great gala performance in Dresden. A committee was appointed
for the execution of this plan, and as things soon became pretty warm,
Lowe turned it into a regular revolutionary tribunal, over which, as the great
day of triumph approached, he presided day and night without resting, and
by his furious zeal earned from me the nickname of ‘Robespierre.’
In spite of the fact that I had been placed at the head of this enterprise, I
luckily managed to evade his terrorism, as I was fully occupied with a great
composition promised for the festival. The task had been assigned to me of
writing an important piece for male voices only, which, if possible, should
occupy half an hour. I reflected that the tiresome monotony of male singing,
Page 287
which even the orchestra could only enliven to a slight extent, can only be
endured by the introduction of dramatic themes. I therefore designed a great
choral scene, selecting the apostolic Pentecost with the outpouring of the
Holy Ghost as its subject. I completely avoided any real solos, but worked
out the whole in such a way that it should be executed by detached choral
masses according to requirement. Out of this composition arose my
Liebesmahl der Apostel (‘Lovefeast of the Apostles’), which has recently
been performed in various places.
As I was obliged at all costs to finish it within a limited time, I do not
mind including this in the list of my uninspired compositions. But I was not
displeased with it when it was done, more especially when it was played at
the rehearsals given by the Dresden choral societies under my personal
supervision. When, therefore, twelve hundred singers from all parts of
Saxony gathered around me in the Frauenkirche, where the performance
took place, I was astonished at the comparatively feeble effect produced
upon my ear by this colossal human tangle of sounds. The conclusion at
which I arrived was, that these enormous choral undertakings are folly, and
I never again felt inclined to repeat the experiment.
It was with much difficulty that I shook myself free of the Dresden Glee
Club, and I only succeeded in doing so by introducing to Professor Lowe
another ambitious man in the person of Herr Ferdinand Hiller. My most
glorious exploit in connection with this association was the transfer of
Weber’s ashes, of which I will speak later on, though it occurred at an
earlier date. I will only refer now to another commissioned composition
which, as royal bandmaster, I was officially commanded to produce. On the
7th of June of this year (1843) the statue of King Frederick Augustus by
Rietschl was unveiled in the Dresden Zwinger [12] with all due pomp and
ceremony. In honour of this event I, in collaboration with Mendelssohn,
was commanded to compose a festal song, and to conduct the gala
performance. I had written a simple song for male voices of modest design,
whereas to Mendelssohn had been assigned the more complicated task of
interweaving the National Anthem (the English ‘God Save the King,’ which
in Saxony is called Heil Dir im Rautenkranz) into the male chorus he had to
compose. This he had effected by an artistic work in counterpoint, so
arranged that from the first eight beats of his original melody the brass
instruments simultaneously played the Anglo-Saxon popular air. My
simpler song seems to have sounded very well from a distance, whereas I
endured by the introduction of dramatic themes. I therefore designed a great
choral scene, selecting the apostolic Pentecost with the outpouring of the
Holy Ghost as its subject. I completely avoided any real solos, but worked
out the whole in such a way that it should be executed by detached choral
masses according to requirement. Out of this composition arose my
Liebesmahl der Apostel (‘Lovefeast of the Apostles’), which has recently
been performed in various places.
As I was obliged at all costs to finish it within a limited time, I do not
mind including this in the list of my uninspired compositions. But I was not
displeased with it when it was done, more especially when it was played at
the rehearsals given by the Dresden choral societies under my personal
supervision. When, therefore, twelve hundred singers from all parts of
Saxony gathered around me in the Frauenkirche, where the performance
took place, I was astonished at the comparatively feeble effect produced
upon my ear by this colossal human tangle of sounds. The conclusion at
which I arrived was, that these enormous choral undertakings are folly, and
I never again felt inclined to repeat the experiment.
It was with much difficulty that I shook myself free of the Dresden Glee
Club, and I only succeeded in doing so by introducing to Professor Lowe
another ambitious man in the person of Herr Ferdinand Hiller. My most
glorious exploit in connection with this association was the transfer of
Weber’s ashes, of which I will speak later on, though it occurred at an
earlier date. I will only refer now to another commissioned composition
which, as royal bandmaster, I was officially commanded to produce. On the
7th of June of this year (1843) the statue of King Frederick Augustus by
Rietschl was unveiled in the Dresden Zwinger [12] with all due pomp and
ceremony. In honour of this event I, in collaboration with Mendelssohn,
was commanded to compose a festal song, and to conduct the gala
performance. I had written a simple song for male voices of modest design,
whereas to Mendelssohn had been assigned the more complicated task of
interweaving the National Anthem (the English ‘God Save the King,’ which
in Saxony is called Heil Dir im Rautenkranz) into the male chorus he had to
compose. This he had effected by an artistic work in counterpoint, so
arranged that from the first eight beats of his original melody the brass
instruments simultaneously played the Anglo-Saxon popular air. My
simpler song seems to have sounded very well from a distance, whereas I
Page 288
understood that Mendelssohn’s daring combination quite missed its effect,
because no one could understand why the vocalists did not sing the same air
as the wind instruments were playing. Nevertheless Mendelssohn, who was
present, left me a written expression of thanks for the pains I had taken in
the production of his composition. I also received a gold snuff-box from the
grand gala committee, presumably meant as a reward for my male chorus,
but the hunting scene which was engraved on the top was so badly done
that I found, to my surprise, that in several places the metal was cut
through.
[12] This is the name by which the famous Dresden Art Galleries are known.—
Editor.
Amid all the distractions of this new and very different mode of life, I
diligently strove to concentrate and steel my soul against these influences,
bearing in mind my experiences of success in the past. By May of my
thirtieth year I had finished my poem Der Venusberg (‘The Mount of
Venus’), as I called Tannhäuser at that time. I had not yet by any means
gained any real knowledge of mediaeval poetry. The classical side of the
poetry of the Middle Ages had so far only faintly dawned upon me, partly
from my youthful recollections, and partly from the brief acquaintance I
had made with it through Lehrs’ instruction in Paris.
Now that I was secure in the possession of a royal appointment that
would last my lifetime, the establishment of a permanent domestic hearth
began to assume great importance; for I hoped it would enable me to take
up my serious studies once more, and in such a way as to make them
productive—an aim which my theatrical life and the miseries of my years in
Paris had rendered impossible. My hope of being able to do this was
strengthened by the character of my official employment, which was never
very arduous, and in which I met with exceptional consideration from the
general management. Though I had only held my appointment for a few
months, yet I was given a holiday this first summer, which I spent in a
second visit to Toplitz, a place which I had grown to like, and whither I had
sent on my wife in advance.
Keenly indeed did I appreciate the change in my position since the
preceding year. I could now engage four spacious and well-appointed rooms
in the same house—the Eiche at Schonau—where I had before lived in such
straitened and frugal circumstances. I invited my sister Clara to pay us a
because no one could understand why the vocalists did not sing the same air
as the wind instruments were playing. Nevertheless Mendelssohn, who was
present, left me a written expression of thanks for the pains I had taken in
the production of his composition. I also received a gold snuff-box from the
grand gala committee, presumably meant as a reward for my male chorus,
but the hunting scene which was engraved on the top was so badly done
that I found, to my surprise, that in several places the metal was cut
through.
[12] This is the name by which the famous Dresden Art Galleries are known.—
Editor.
Amid all the distractions of this new and very different mode of life, I
diligently strove to concentrate and steel my soul against these influences,
bearing in mind my experiences of success in the past. By May of my
thirtieth year I had finished my poem Der Venusberg (‘The Mount of
Venus’), as I called Tannhäuser at that time. I had not yet by any means
gained any real knowledge of mediaeval poetry. The classical side of the
poetry of the Middle Ages had so far only faintly dawned upon me, partly
from my youthful recollections, and partly from the brief acquaintance I
had made with it through Lehrs’ instruction in Paris.
Now that I was secure in the possession of a royal appointment that
would last my lifetime, the establishment of a permanent domestic hearth
began to assume great importance; for I hoped it would enable me to take
up my serious studies once more, and in such a way as to make them
productive—an aim which my theatrical life and the miseries of my years in
Paris had rendered impossible. My hope of being able to do this was
strengthened by the character of my official employment, which was never
very arduous, and in which I met with exceptional consideration from the
general management. Though I had only held my appointment for a few
months, yet I was given a holiday this first summer, which I spent in a
second visit to Toplitz, a place which I had grown to like, and whither I had
sent on my wife in advance.
Keenly indeed did I appreciate the change in my position since the
preceding year. I could now engage four spacious and well-appointed rooms
in the same house—the Eiche at Schonau—where I had before lived in such
straitened and frugal circumstances. I invited my sister Clara to pay us a
Page 289
visit, and also my good mother, whose gout necessitated her taking the
Toplitz baths every year. I also seized the opportunity of drinking the
mineral waters, which I hoped might have a beneficial effect on the gastric
troubles from which I had suffered ever since my vicissitudes in Paris.
Unfortunately the attempted cure had a contrary effect, and when I
complained of the painful irritation produced, I learned that my constitution
was not adapted for water cures. In fact, on my morning promenade, and
while drinking my water, I had been observed to race through the shady
alleys of the adjacent Thurn Gardens, and it was pointed out to me that such
a cure could only be properly wrought by leisurely calm and easy
sauntering. It was also remarked that I usually carried about a fairly stout
volume, and that, armed with this and my bottle of mineral water, I used to
take rest in lonely places.
This book was J. Grimm’s German Mythology. All who know the work
can understand how the unusual wealth of its contents, gathered from every
side, and meant almost exclusively for the student, would react upon me,
whose mind was everywhere seeking for something definite and distinct.
Formed from the scanty fragments of a perished world, of which scarcely
any monuments remained recognisable and intact, I here found a
heterogeneous building, which at first glance seemed but a rugged rock
clothed in straggling brambles. Nothing was finished, only here and there
could the slightest resemblance to an architectonic line be traced, so that I
often felt tempted to relinquish the thankless task of trying to build from
such materials. And yet I was enchained by a wondrous magic. The baldest
legend spoke to me of its ancient home, and soon my whole imagination
thrilled with images; long-lost forms for which I had sought so eagerly
shaped themselves ever more and more clearly into realities that lived
again. There rose up soon before my mind a whole world of figures, which
revealed themselves as so strangely plastic and primitive, that, when I saw
them clearly before me and heard their voices in my heart, I could not
account for the almost tangible familiarity and assurance of their
demeanour. The effect they produced upon the inner state of my soul I can
only describe as an entire rebirth. Just as we feel a tender joy over a child’s
first bright smile of recognition, so now my own eyes flashed with rapture
as I saw a world, revealed, as it were, by miracle, in which I had hitherto
moved blindly as the babe in its mother’s womb.
Toplitz baths every year. I also seized the opportunity of drinking the
mineral waters, which I hoped might have a beneficial effect on the gastric
troubles from which I had suffered ever since my vicissitudes in Paris.
Unfortunately the attempted cure had a contrary effect, and when I
complained of the painful irritation produced, I learned that my constitution
was not adapted for water cures. In fact, on my morning promenade, and
while drinking my water, I had been observed to race through the shady
alleys of the adjacent Thurn Gardens, and it was pointed out to me that such
a cure could only be properly wrought by leisurely calm and easy
sauntering. It was also remarked that I usually carried about a fairly stout
volume, and that, armed with this and my bottle of mineral water, I used to
take rest in lonely places.
This book was J. Grimm’s German Mythology. All who know the work
can understand how the unusual wealth of its contents, gathered from every
side, and meant almost exclusively for the student, would react upon me,
whose mind was everywhere seeking for something definite and distinct.
Formed from the scanty fragments of a perished world, of which scarcely
any monuments remained recognisable and intact, I here found a
heterogeneous building, which at first glance seemed but a rugged rock
clothed in straggling brambles. Nothing was finished, only here and there
could the slightest resemblance to an architectonic line be traced, so that I
often felt tempted to relinquish the thankless task of trying to build from
such materials. And yet I was enchained by a wondrous magic. The baldest
legend spoke to me of its ancient home, and soon my whole imagination
thrilled with images; long-lost forms for which I had sought so eagerly
shaped themselves ever more and more clearly into realities that lived
again. There rose up soon before my mind a whole world of figures, which
revealed themselves as so strangely plastic and primitive, that, when I saw
them clearly before me and heard their voices in my heart, I could not
account for the almost tangible familiarity and assurance of their
demeanour. The effect they produced upon the inner state of my soul I can
only describe as an entire rebirth. Just as we feel a tender joy over a child’s
first bright smile of recognition, so now my own eyes flashed with rapture
as I saw a world, revealed, as it were, by miracle, in which I had hitherto
moved blindly as the babe in its mother’s womb.
Page 290
But the result of this reading did not at first do much to help me in my
purpose of composing part of the Tannhäuser music. I had had a piano put
in my room at the Eiche, and though I smashed all its strings, nothing
satisfactory would emerge. With much pain and toil I sketched the first
outlines of my music for the Venusberg, as fortunately I already had its
theme in my mind. Meanwhile I was very much troubled by excitability and
rushes of blood to the brain. I imagined I was ill, and lay for whole days in
bed, where I read Grimm’s German legends, or tried to master the
disagreeable mythology. It was quite a relief when I hit upon the happy
thought of freeing myself from the torments of my condition by an
excursion to Prague. Meanwhile I had already ascended Mount Millischau
once with my wife, and in her company I now made the journey to Prague
in an open carriage. There I stayed once more at my favourite inn, the Black
Horse, met my friend Kittl, who had now grown fat and rotund, made
various excursions, revelled in the curious antiquities of the old city, and
learned to my joy that the two lovely friends of my youth, Jenny and
Auguste Pachta, had been happily married to members of the highest
aristocracy. Thereupon, having reassured myself that everything was in the
best possible order, I returned to Dresden and resumed my functions as
musical conductor to the King of Saxony.
We now set to work on the preparations and furnishing of a roomy and
well-situated house in the Ostra Allee, with an outlook upon the Zwinger.
Everything was good and substantial, as is only right for a man of thirty
who is settling down at last for the whole of his life. As I had not received
any subsidy towards this outlay, I had naturally to raise the money by loan.
But I could look forward to a certain harvest from my operatic successes in
Dresden, and what was more natural than for me to expect soon to earn
more than enough? The three most valued treasures which adorned my
house were a concert grand piano by Breitkopf and Hartel, which I had
bought with much pride; a stately writing-desk, now in possession of Otto
Kummer, the chamber-music artist; and the title-page by Cornelius for the
Nibelungen, in a handsome Gothic frame—the only object which has
remained faithful to me to the present day. But the thing which above all
else made my house seem homelike and attractive was the presence of a
library, which I procured in accordance with a systematic plan laid down by
my proposed line of study. On the failure of my Dresden career this library
passed in a curious way into the possession of Herr Heinrich Brockhaus, to
purpose of composing part of the Tannhäuser music. I had had a piano put
in my room at the Eiche, and though I smashed all its strings, nothing
satisfactory would emerge. With much pain and toil I sketched the first
outlines of my music for the Venusberg, as fortunately I already had its
theme in my mind. Meanwhile I was very much troubled by excitability and
rushes of blood to the brain. I imagined I was ill, and lay for whole days in
bed, where I read Grimm’s German legends, or tried to master the
disagreeable mythology. It was quite a relief when I hit upon the happy
thought of freeing myself from the torments of my condition by an
excursion to Prague. Meanwhile I had already ascended Mount Millischau
once with my wife, and in her company I now made the journey to Prague
in an open carriage. There I stayed once more at my favourite inn, the Black
Horse, met my friend Kittl, who had now grown fat and rotund, made
various excursions, revelled in the curious antiquities of the old city, and
learned to my joy that the two lovely friends of my youth, Jenny and
Auguste Pachta, had been happily married to members of the highest
aristocracy. Thereupon, having reassured myself that everything was in the
best possible order, I returned to Dresden and resumed my functions as
musical conductor to the King of Saxony.
We now set to work on the preparations and furnishing of a roomy and
well-situated house in the Ostra Allee, with an outlook upon the Zwinger.
Everything was good and substantial, as is only right for a man of thirty
who is settling down at last for the whole of his life. As I had not received
any subsidy towards this outlay, I had naturally to raise the money by loan.
But I could look forward to a certain harvest from my operatic successes in
Dresden, and what was more natural than for me to expect soon to earn
more than enough? The three most valued treasures which adorned my
house were a concert grand piano by Breitkopf and Hartel, which I had
bought with much pride; a stately writing-desk, now in possession of Otto
Kummer, the chamber-music artist; and the title-page by Cornelius for the
Nibelungen, in a handsome Gothic frame—the only object which has
remained faithful to me to the present day. But the thing which above all
else made my house seem homelike and attractive was the presence of a
library, which I procured in accordance with a systematic plan laid down by
my proposed line of study. On the failure of my Dresden career this library
passed in a curious way into the possession of Herr Heinrich Brockhaus, to
Page 291
whom at that time I owed fifteen hundred marks, and who took it as
security for the amount. My wife knew nothing at the time of this
obligation, and I never afterwards succeeded in recovering this
characteristic collection from his hands. Upon its shelves old German
literature was especially well represented, and also the closely related work
of the German Middle Ages, including many a costly volume, as, for
instance, the rare old work, Romans des douze Paris. Beside these stood
many excellent historical works on the Middle Ages, as well as on the
German people in general. At the same time I made provision for the
poetical and classical literature of all times and languages. Among these
were the Italian poets, Shakespeare and the French writers, of whose
language I had a passable knowledge. All these I acquired in the original,
hoping some day to find time to master their neglected tongues. As for the
Greek and Roman classics, I had to content myself with standard German
translations. Indeed, on looking once more into my Homer—whom I
secured in the original Greek—I soon recognised that I should be
presuming on more leisure than my conductorship was likely to leave me, if
I hoped to find time for regaining my lost knowledge of that language.
Moreover, I provided most thoroughly for a study of universal history, and
to this end did not fail to equip myself with the most voluminous works.
Thus armed, I thought I could bid defiance to all the trials which I clearly
foresaw would inevitably accompany my calling and position. In hopes,
therefore, of long and peaceable enjoyment of this hard-earned home, I
entered into possession with the best of spirits in October of this year
(1843), and though my conductor’s quarters were by no means magnificent,
they were stately and substantial.
The first leisure in my new home which I could snatch from the claims of
my profession and my favourite studies was devoted to the composition of
Tannhäuser, the first act of which was completed in January of the new
year, 1844. I have no recollections of any importance regarding my
activities in Dresden during this winter. The only memorable events were
two enterprises which took me away from home, the first to Berlin early in
the year, for the production of my Fliegender Holländer, and the other in
March to Hamburg for Rienzi.
Of these the former made the greater impression upon my mind. The
manager of the Berlin theatre, Küstner, quite took me by surprise when he
security for the amount. My wife knew nothing at the time of this
obligation, and I never afterwards succeeded in recovering this
characteristic collection from his hands. Upon its shelves old German
literature was especially well represented, and also the closely related work
of the German Middle Ages, including many a costly volume, as, for
instance, the rare old work, Romans des douze Paris. Beside these stood
many excellent historical works on the Middle Ages, as well as on the
German people in general. At the same time I made provision for the
poetical and classical literature of all times and languages. Among these
were the Italian poets, Shakespeare and the French writers, of whose
language I had a passable knowledge. All these I acquired in the original,
hoping some day to find time to master their neglected tongues. As for the
Greek and Roman classics, I had to content myself with standard German
translations. Indeed, on looking once more into my Homer—whom I
secured in the original Greek—I soon recognised that I should be
presuming on more leisure than my conductorship was likely to leave me, if
I hoped to find time for regaining my lost knowledge of that language.
Moreover, I provided most thoroughly for a study of universal history, and
to this end did not fail to equip myself with the most voluminous works.
Thus armed, I thought I could bid defiance to all the trials which I clearly
foresaw would inevitably accompany my calling and position. In hopes,
therefore, of long and peaceable enjoyment of this hard-earned home, I
entered into possession with the best of spirits in October of this year
(1843), and though my conductor’s quarters were by no means magnificent,
they were stately and substantial.
The first leisure in my new home which I could snatch from the claims of
my profession and my favourite studies was devoted to the composition of
Tannhäuser, the first act of which was completed in January of the new
year, 1844. I have no recollections of any importance regarding my
activities in Dresden during this winter. The only memorable events were
two enterprises which took me away from home, the first to Berlin early in
the year, for the production of my Fliegender Holländer, and the other in
March to Hamburg for Rienzi.
Of these the former made the greater impression upon my mind. The
manager of the Berlin theatre, Küstner, quite took me by surprise when he
Page 292
announced the first performance of the Fliegender Holländer for an early
date.
As the opera house had been burnt down only about a year before, and
could not possibly have been rebuilt, it had not occurred to me to remind
them about the production of my opera. It had been performed in Dresden
with very poor scenic accessories, and knowing how important a careful
and artistic execution of the difficult scenery was for my dramatic sea-
scapes, I had relied implicitly on the admirable management and staging
capacities of the Berlin opera house. Consequently I was very much
annoyed that the Berlin manager should select my opera as a stopgap to be
produced at the Comedy Theatre, which was being used as a temporary
opera house. All remonstrances proved useless, for I learned that they were
not merely thinking about rehearsing the work, but that it was already
actually being rehearsed, and would be produced in a few days. It was
obvious that this arrangement meant that my opera was to be condemned to
quite a short run in their repertoire, as it was not to be expected that they
would remount it when the new opera house was opened. On the other
hand, they tried to appease me by saying that this first production of the
Fliegender Holländer was to be associated with a special engagement of
Schroder-Devrient, which was to begin in Berlin immediately. They
naturally thought I should be delighted to see the great actress in my own
work. But this only confirmed me in the suspicion that this opera was
simply wanted as a makeshift for the duration of Schroder-Devrient’s visit.
They were evidently in a dilemma with regard to her repertoire, which
consisted mainly of so-called grand operas—such as Meyerbeer’s—
destined exclusively for the opera house, and which were being specially
reserved for the brilliant future of the new building. I therefore realised
beforehand that my Fliegender Holländer was to be relegated to the
category of conductor’s operas, and would meet with the usual predestined
fate of such productions. The whole treatment meted out to me and my
works all pointed in the same direction; but in consideration of the expected
co-operation of Schroder-Devrient I fought against these vexatious
premonitions, and set out for Berlin to do all I could for the success of my
opera. I saw at once that my presence was very necessary. I found the
conductor’s desk occupied by a man calling himself Conductor Henning (or
Henniger), an official who had won promotion from the ranks of ordinary
musicians by an upright observance of the laws of seniority, but who knew
date.
As the opera house had been burnt down only about a year before, and
could not possibly have been rebuilt, it had not occurred to me to remind
them about the production of my opera. It had been performed in Dresden
with very poor scenic accessories, and knowing how important a careful
and artistic execution of the difficult scenery was for my dramatic sea-
scapes, I had relied implicitly on the admirable management and staging
capacities of the Berlin opera house. Consequently I was very much
annoyed that the Berlin manager should select my opera as a stopgap to be
produced at the Comedy Theatre, which was being used as a temporary
opera house. All remonstrances proved useless, for I learned that they were
not merely thinking about rehearsing the work, but that it was already
actually being rehearsed, and would be produced in a few days. It was
obvious that this arrangement meant that my opera was to be condemned to
quite a short run in their repertoire, as it was not to be expected that they
would remount it when the new opera house was opened. On the other
hand, they tried to appease me by saying that this first production of the
Fliegender Holländer was to be associated with a special engagement of
Schroder-Devrient, which was to begin in Berlin immediately. They
naturally thought I should be delighted to see the great actress in my own
work. But this only confirmed me in the suspicion that this opera was
simply wanted as a makeshift for the duration of Schroder-Devrient’s visit.
They were evidently in a dilemma with regard to her repertoire, which
consisted mainly of so-called grand operas—such as Meyerbeer’s—
destined exclusively for the opera house, and which were being specially
reserved for the brilliant future of the new building. I therefore realised
beforehand that my Fliegender Holländer was to be relegated to the
category of conductor’s operas, and would meet with the usual predestined
fate of such productions. The whole treatment meted out to me and my
works all pointed in the same direction; but in consideration of the expected
co-operation of Schroder-Devrient I fought against these vexatious
premonitions, and set out for Berlin to do all I could for the success of my
opera. I saw at once that my presence was very necessary. I found the
conductor’s desk occupied by a man calling himself Conductor Henning (or
Henniger), an official who had won promotion from the ranks of ordinary
musicians by an upright observance of the laws of seniority, but who knew
Page 293
precious little about conducting an orchestra at all, and about my opera had
not the faintest glimmer of an idea. I took my seat at the desk, and
conducted one full rehearsal and two performances, in neither of which,
however, did Schroder-Devrient take part. Although I found much to
complain of in the weakness of the string instruments and the consequent
mean sound of the orchestra, yet I was well satisfied with the actors both as
regards their capacity and their zeal. The careful staging, moreover, which
under the supervision of the really gifted stage manager, Blum, and with the
co-operation of his skilful and ingenious mechanics, was truly excellent,
gave me a most pleasant surprise.
I was now very curious to learn what effect these pleasing and
encouraging preparations would have upon the Berlin public when the full
performance took place. My experiences on this point were very curious.
Apparently the only thing that interested the large audience was to discover
my weak points. During the first act the prevalent opinion seemed to be that
I belonged to the category of bores. Not a single hand was moved, and I
was afterwards informed that this was fortunate, as the slightest attempt at
applause would have been ascribed to a paid claque, and would have been
energetically opposed. Küstner alone assured me that the composure with
which, on the close of this act, I quitted my desk and appeared before the
curtain, had filled him with wonder, considering this entire absence—lucky
as it appears to have been—of all applause. But so long as I myself felt
content with the execution, I was not disposed to let the public apathy
discourage me, knowing, as I did, that the crucial test was in the second act.
It lay, therefore, much nearer my heart to do all I could for the success of
this than to inquire into the reasons for this attitude on the part of the Berlin
public. And here the ice was really broken at last. The audience seemed to
abandon all idea of finding a proper niche for me, and allowed itself to be
carried away into giving vent to applause, which at last grew into the most
boisterous enthusiasm. At the close of the act, amid a storm of shouts, I led
forward my singers on to the stage for the customary bows of thanks. As the
third act was too short to be tedious, and as the scenic effects were both new
and impressive, we could not help hoping that we had won a veritable
triumph, especially as renewed outbursts of applause marked the end of the
performance. Mendelssohn, who happened at that time to be in Berlin, with
Meyerbeer, on business relating to the general musical conductorship, was
present in a stage box during this performance. He followed its progress
not the faintest glimmer of an idea. I took my seat at the desk, and
conducted one full rehearsal and two performances, in neither of which,
however, did Schroder-Devrient take part. Although I found much to
complain of in the weakness of the string instruments and the consequent
mean sound of the orchestra, yet I was well satisfied with the actors both as
regards their capacity and their zeal. The careful staging, moreover, which
under the supervision of the really gifted stage manager, Blum, and with the
co-operation of his skilful and ingenious mechanics, was truly excellent,
gave me a most pleasant surprise.
I was now very curious to learn what effect these pleasing and
encouraging preparations would have upon the Berlin public when the full
performance took place. My experiences on this point were very curious.
Apparently the only thing that interested the large audience was to discover
my weak points. During the first act the prevalent opinion seemed to be that
I belonged to the category of bores. Not a single hand was moved, and I
was afterwards informed that this was fortunate, as the slightest attempt at
applause would have been ascribed to a paid claque, and would have been
energetically opposed. Küstner alone assured me that the composure with
which, on the close of this act, I quitted my desk and appeared before the
curtain, had filled him with wonder, considering this entire absence—lucky
as it appears to have been—of all applause. But so long as I myself felt
content with the execution, I was not disposed to let the public apathy
discourage me, knowing, as I did, that the crucial test was in the second act.
It lay, therefore, much nearer my heart to do all I could for the success of
this than to inquire into the reasons for this attitude on the part of the Berlin
public. And here the ice was really broken at last. The audience seemed to
abandon all idea of finding a proper niche for me, and allowed itself to be
carried away into giving vent to applause, which at last grew into the most
boisterous enthusiasm. At the close of the act, amid a storm of shouts, I led
forward my singers on to the stage for the customary bows of thanks. As the
third act was too short to be tedious, and as the scenic effects were both new
and impressive, we could not help hoping that we had won a veritable
triumph, especially as renewed outbursts of applause marked the end of the
performance. Mendelssohn, who happened at that time to be in Berlin, with
Meyerbeer, on business relating to the general musical conductorship, was
present in a stage box during this performance. He followed its progress
Page 294
with a pale face, and afterwards came and murmured to me in a weary tone
of voice, ‘Well, I should think you are satisfied now!’ I met him several
times during my brief stay in Berlin., and also spent an evening with him
listening to various pieces of chamber-music. But never did another word
concerning the Fliegender Holländer pass his lips, beyond inquiries as to
the second performance, and as to whether Devrient or some one else would
appear in it. I heard, moreover, that he had responded with equal
indifference to the earnest warmth of my allusions to his own music for the
Midsummer Night’s Dream, which was being frequently played at that
time, and which I had heard for the first time. The only thing he discussed
with any detail was the actor Gern, who was playing in Zettel, and who he
considered was overacting his part.
A few days later came a second performance with the same cast. My
experiences on this evening were even more startling than on the former.
Evidently the first night had won me a few friends, who were again present,
for they began to applaud after the overture. But others responded with
hisses, and for the rest of the evening no one again ventured to applaud. My
old friend Heine had arrived in the meantime from Dresden, sent by our
own board of directors to study the scenic arrangements of the Midsummer
Night’s Dream for our theatre. He was present at this second performance,
and had persuaded me to accept the invitation from one of his Berlin
relatives to have supper after the performance in a wine-bar unter den
Linden. Very weary, I followed him to a nasty and badly lighted house,
where I gulped down the wine with hasty ill-humour to warm myself, and
listened to the embarrassed conversation of my good-natured friend and his
companion, whilst I turned over the day’s papers. I now had ample leisure
to read the criticisms they contained on the first performance of my
Fliegender Holländer. A terrible spasm cut my heart as I realised the
contemptible tone and unparalleled shamelessness of their raging ignorance
regarding my own name and work. Our Berlin friend and host, a thorough
Philistine, said that he had known how things would go in the theatre that
night, after having read these criticisms in the morning. The people of
Berlin, he added, wait to hear what Rellstab and his mates have to say, and
then they know how to behave. The good fellow was anxious to cheer me
up, and ordered one wine after another. Heine hunted up his reminiscences
of our merry Rienzi times in Dresden, until at last the pair conducted me,
staggering along in an addled condition, to my hotel.
of voice, ‘Well, I should think you are satisfied now!’ I met him several
times during my brief stay in Berlin., and also spent an evening with him
listening to various pieces of chamber-music. But never did another word
concerning the Fliegender Holländer pass his lips, beyond inquiries as to
the second performance, and as to whether Devrient or some one else would
appear in it. I heard, moreover, that he had responded with equal
indifference to the earnest warmth of my allusions to his own music for the
Midsummer Night’s Dream, which was being frequently played at that
time, and which I had heard for the first time. The only thing he discussed
with any detail was the actor Gern, who was playing in Zettel, and who he
considered was overacting his part.
A few days later came a second performance with the same cast. My
experiences on this evening were even more startling than on the former.
Evidently the first night had won me a few friends, who were again present,
for they began to applaud after the overture. But others responded with
hisses, and for the rest of the evening no one again ventured to applaud. My
old friend Heine had arrived in the meantime from Dresden, sent by our
own board of directors to study the scenic arrangements of the Midsummer
Night’s Dream for our theatre. He was present at this second performance,
and had persuaded me to accept the invitation from one of his Berlin
relatives to have supper after the performance in a wine-bar unter den
Linden. Very weary, I followed him to a nasty and badly lighted house,
where I gulped down the wine with hasty ill-humour to warm myself, and
listened to the embarrassed conversation of my good-natured friend and his
companion, whilst I turned over the day’s papers. I now had ample leisure
to read the criticisms they contained on the first performance of my
Fliegender Holländer. A terrible spasm cut my heart as I realised the
contemptible tone and unparalleled shamelessness of their raging ignorance
regarding my own name and work. Our Berlin friend and host, a thorough
Philistine, said that he had known how things would go in the theatre that
night, after having read these criticisms in the morning. The people of
Berlin, he added, wait to hear what Rellstab and his mates have to say, and
then they know how to behave. The good fellow was anxious to cheer me
up, and ordered one wine after another. Heine hunted up his reminiscences
of our merry Rienzi times in Dresden, until at last the pair conducted me,
staggering along in an addled condition, to my hotel.
Page 295
It was already midnight. As I was being lighted by the waiter through its
gloomy corridors to my room, a gentleman in black, with a pale refined
face, came forward and said he would like to speak to me. He informed me
that he had waited there since the close of the play, and as he was
determined to see me, had stopped till now. I excused myself on the ground
of being quite unfit for business, and added that, although not exactly
inclined to merriment, I had, as he might perceive, somewhat foolishly
drunk a little too much wine. This I said in a stammering voice; but my
strange visitor seemed only the more unwilling to be repulsed. He
accompanied me to my room, declaring that it was all the more imperative
for him to speak with me. We seated ourselves in the cold room, by the
meagre light of a single candle, and then he began to talk. In flowing and
impressive language he related that he had been present at the performance
that night of my Fliegender Holländer, and could well conceive the humour
in which the evening’s experiences had left me. For this very reason he felt
that nothing should hinder him from speaking to me that night, and telling
me that in the Fliegender Holländer I had produced an unrivalled
masterpiece. Moreover, the acquaintance he had made with this work had
awakened in him a new and unforeseen hope for the future of German art;
and that it would be a great pity if I yielded to any sense of discouragement
as the result of the unworthy reception accorded to it by the Berlin public.
My hair began to stand on end. One of Hoffmann’s fantastic creations had
entered bodily into my life. I could find nothing to say, except to inquire the
name of my visitor, at which he seemed surprised, as I had talked with him
the day before at Mendelssohn’s house. He said that my conversation and
manner had created such an impression upon him there, and had filled him
with such sudden regret at not having sufficiently overcome his dislike for
opera in general, to be present at the first performance, that he had at once
resolved not to miss the second. His name, he added, was Professor Werder.
That was no use to me, I said, he must write his name down. Getting paper
and ink, he did as I desired, and we parted. I flung myself unconsciously on
the bed for a deep and invigorating sleep. Next morning I was fresh and
well. I paid a farewell call on Schroeder-Devrient, who promised me to do
all she could for the Fliegender Holländer as soon as possible, drew my fee
of a hundred ducats, and set off for home. On my way through Leipzig I
utilised my ducats for the repayment of sundry advances made me by my
relatives during the earlier and poverty-stricken period of my sojourn in
gloomy corridors to my room, a gentleman in black, with a pale refined
face, came forward and said he would like to speak to me. He informed me
that he had waited there since the close of the play, and as he was
determined to see me, had stopped till now. I excused myself on the ground
of being quite unfit for business, and added that, although not exactly
inclined to merriment, I had, as he might perceive, somewhat foolishly
drunk a little too much wine. This I said in a stammering voice; but my
strange visitor seemed only the more unwilling to be repulsed. He
accompanied me to my room, declaring that it was all the more imperative
for him to speak with me. We seated ourselves in the cold room, by the
meagre light of a single candle, and then he began to talk. In flowing and
impressive language he related that he had been present at the performance
that night of my Fliegender Holländer, and could well conceive the humour
in which the evening’s experiences had left me. For this very reason he felt
that nothing should hinder him from speaking to me that night, and telling
me that in the Fliegender Holländer I had produced an unrivalled
masterpiece. Moreover, the acquaintance he had made with this work had
awakened in him a new and unforeseen hope for the future of German art;
and that it would be a great pity if I yielded to any sense of discouragement
as the result of the unworthy reception accorded to it by the Berlin public.
My hair began to stand on end. One of Hoffmann’s fantastic creations had
entered bodily into my life. I could find nothing to say, except to inquire the
name of my visitor, at which he seemed surprised, as I had talked with him
the day before at Mendelssohn’s house. He said that my conversation and
manner had created such an impression upon him there, and had filled him
with such sudden regret at not having sufficiently overcome his dislike for
opera in general, to be present at the first performance, that he had at once
resolved not to miss the second. His name, he added, was Professor Werder.
That was no use to me, I said, he must write his name down. Getting paper
and ink, he did as I desired, and we parted. I flung myself unconsciously on
the bed for a deep and invigorating sleep. Next morning I was fresh and
well. I paid a farewell call on Schroeder-Devrient, who promised me to do
all she could for the Fliegender Holländer as soon as possible, drew my fee
of a hundred ducats, and set off for home. On my way through Leipzig I
utilised my ducats for the repayment of sundry advances made me by my
relatives during the earlier and poverty-stricken period of my sojourn in
Page 296
Dresden, and then continued my journey, to recuperate among my books
and meditate upon the deep impression made on me by Werder’s midnight
visit.
Before the end of this winter I received a genuine invitation to Hamburg
for the performance of Rienzi. The enterprising director, Herr Cornet,
through whom it came, confessed that he had many difficulties to contend
against in the management of his theatre, and was in need of a great
success. This, after the reception with which it had met in Dresden, he
thought he could secure by the production of Rienzi. I accordingly betook
myself thither in the month of March. The journey at that time was not an
easy one, as after Hanover one had to proceed by mail-coach, and the
crossing of the Elbe, which was full of floating ice, was a risky business.
Owing to a great fire that had recently broken out, the town of Hamburg
was in process of being rebuilt, and there were still many wide spaces
encumbered with ruins. Cold weather and an ever-gloomy sky make my
recollections of my somewhat prolonged sojourn in this town anything but
agreeable. I was tormented to such an extent by having to rehearse with bad
material, fit only for the poorest theatrical trumpery, that, worn out and
exposed to constant colds, I spent most of my leisure time in the solitude of
my inn chamber. My earlier experiences of ill-arranged and badly managed
theatres came back to me afresh. I was particularly depressed when I
realised that I had made myself an unconscious accomplice of Director
Cornet’s basest interests. His one aim was to create a sensation, which he
thought should be of great service to me also; and not only did he put me
off with a smaller fee, but even suggested that it should be paid by gradual
instalments. The dignity of scenic decoration, of which he had not the
smallest idea, was completely sacrificed to the most ridiculous and tawdry
showiness. He imagined that pageantry was all that was really needed to
secure my success. So he hunted out all the old fairy-ballet costumes from
his stock, and fancied that if they only looked gay enough, and if plenty of
people were bustling about on the stage, I ought to be satisfied. But the
most sorry item of all was the singer he provided for the title-role. He was a
man of the name of Wurda, an elderly, flabby and voiceless tenor, who sang
Rienzi with the expression of a lover—like Elvino, for instance, in the
Somnanibula. He was so dreadful that I conceived the idea of making the
Capitol tumble down in the second act, so as to bury him sooner in its ruins,
a plan which would have cut out several of the processions, which were so
and meditate upon the deep impression made on me by Werder’s midnight
visit.
Before the end of this winter I received a genuine invitation to Hamburg
for the performance of Rienzi. The enterprising director, Herr Cornet,
through whom it came, confessed that he had many difficulties to contend
against in the management of his theatre, and was in need of a great
success. This, after the reception with which it had met in Dresden, he
thought he could secure by the production of Rienzi. I accordingly betook
myself thither in the month of March. The journey at that time was not an
easy one, as after Hanover one had to proceed by mail-coach, and the
crossing of the Elbe, which was full of floating ice, was a risky business.
Owing to a great fire that had recently broken out, the town of Hamburg
was in process of being rebuilt, and there were still many wide spaces
encumbered with ruins. Cold weather and an ever-gloomy sky make my
recollections of my somewhat prolonged sojourn in this town anything but
agreeable. I was tormented to such an extent by having to rehearse with bad
material, fit only for the poorest theatrical trumpery, that, worn out and
exposed to constant colds, I spent most of my leisure time in the solitude of
my inn chamber. My earlier experiences of ill-arranged and badly managed
theatres came back to me afresh. I was particularly depressed when I
realised that I had made myself an unconscious accomplice of Director
Cornet’s basest interests. His one aim was to create a sensation, which he
thought should be of great service to me also; and not only did he put me
off with a smaller fee, but even suggested that it should be paid by gradual
instalments. The dignity of scenic decoration, of which he had not the
smallest idea, was completely sacrificed to the most ridiculous and tawdry
showiness. He imagined that pageantry was all that was really needed to
secure my success. So he hunted out all the old fairy-ballet costumes from
his stock, and fancied that if they only looked gay enough, and if plenty of
people were bustling about on the stage, I ought to be satisfied. But the
most sorry item of all was the singer he provided for the title-role. He was a
man of the name of Wurda, an elderly, flabby and voiceless tenor, who sang
Rienzi with the expression of a lover—like Elvino, for instance, in the
Somnanibula. He was so dreadful that I conceived the idea of making the
Capitol tumble down in the second act, so as to bury him sooner in its ruins,
a plan which would have cut out several of the processions, which were so
Page 297
dear to the heart of the director. I found my one ray of light in a lady singer,
who delighted me with the fire with which she played the part of Adriano.
This was a Mme. Fehringer, who was afterwards engaged by Liszt for the
role of Ortrud in the production of Lohengrin at Weimar, but by that time
her powers had greatly deteriorated. Nothing could be more depressing than
my connection with this opera under such dismal circumstances. And yet
there were no outward signs of failure. The manager hoped in any case to
keep Rienzi in his repertoire until Tichatschek was able to come to
Hamburg and give the people of that town a true idea of the play. This
actually took place in the following summer.
My discouragement and ill-humour did not escape the notice of Herr
Cornet, and discovering that I wished to present my wife with a parrot, he
managed to procure a very fine bird, which he gave me as a parting gift. I
carried it with me in its narrow cage on my melancholy journey home, and
was touched to find that it quickly repaid my care and became very much
attached to me. Minna greeted me with great joy when she saw this
beautiful grey parrot, for she regarded it as a self-evident proof that I should
do something in life. We already had a pretty little dog, born on the day of
the first Rienzi rehearsal in Dresden, which, owing to its passionate
devotion to myself, was much petted by all who knew me and visited my
house during those years. This sociable bird, which had no vices and was an
apt scholar, now formed an addition to our household; and the pair did
much to brighten our dwelling in the absence of children. My wife soon
taught the bird snatches of songs from Rienzi, with which it would good-
naturedly greet me from a distance when it heard me coming up the stairs.
And thus at last my domestic hearth seemed to be established with every
possible prospect of a comfortable competency.
No further excursions for the performance of any of my operas took
place, for the simple reason that no such performances were given. As I saw
it was quite clear that the diffusion of my works through the theatrical
world would be a very slow business, I concluded that this was probably
due to the fact that no adaptations of them for the piano existed. I therefore
thought that I should do well to press forward such an issue at all costs, and
in order to secure the expected profits, I hit upon the idea of publishing at
my own expense. I accordingly made arrangements with F. Meser, the court
music-dealer, who had hitherto not got beyond the publication of a valse,
who delighted me with the fire with which she played the part of Adriano.
This was a Mme. Fehringer, who was afterwards engaged by Liszt for the
role of Ortrud in the production of Lohengrin at Weimar, but by that time
her powers had greatly deteriorated. Nothing could be more depressing than
my connection with this opera under such dismal circumstances. And yet
there were no outward signs of failure. The manager hoped in any case to
keep Rienzi in his repertoire until Tichatschek was able to come to
Hamburg and give the people of that town a true idea of the play. This
actually took place in the following summer.
My discouragement and ill-humour did not escape the notice of Herr
Cornet, and discovering that I wished to present my wife with a parrot, he
managed to procure a very fine bird, which he gave me as a parting gift. I
carried it with me in its narrow cage on my melancholy journey home, and
was touched to find that it quickly repaid my care and became very much
attached to me. Minna greeted me with great joy when she saw this
beautiful grey parrot, for she regarded it as a self-evident proof that I should
do something in life. We already had a pretty little dog, born on the day of
the first Rienzi rehearsal in Dresden, which, owing to its passionate
devotion to myself, was much petted by all who knew me and visited my
house during those years. This sociable bird, which had no vices and was an
apt scholar, now formed an addition to our household; and the pair did
much to brighten our dwelling in the absence of children. My wife soon
taught the bird snatches of songs from Rienzi, with which it would good-
naturedly greet me from a distance when it heard me coming up the stairs.
And thus at last my domestic hearth seemed to be established with every
possible prospect of a comfortable competency.
No further excursions for the performance of any of my operas took
place, for the simple reason that no such performances were given. As I saw
it was quite clear that the diffusion of my works through the theatrical
world would be a very slow business, I concluded that this was probably
due to the fact that no adaptations of them for the piano existed. I therefore
thought that I should do well to press forward such an issue at all costs, and
in order to secure the expected profits, I hit upon the idea of publishing at
my own expense. I accordingly made arrangements with F. Meser, the court
music-dealer, who had hitherto not got beyond the publication of a valse,
Page 298
and signed an agreement with him for his firm to appear as the nominal
publishers on the understanding that they should receive a commission of
ten per cent, whilst I provided the necessary capital.
As there were two operas to be issued, including Rienzi, a work of
exceptional bulk, it was not likely that these publications would prove very
profitable unless, in addition to the usual piano selections, I also published
adaptations, such as the music without words, for duet or solo. For this a
fairly large capital was necessary. I also needed funds for the repayment of
the loans already mentioned, and for the settlement of old debts, as well as
to pay off the remaining expenses of my house-furnishing. I was therefore
obliged to try and procure much larger sums. I laid my project and its
motive before Schroder-Devrient, who had just returned to Dresden, at
Easter, 1844, to fulfil a fresh engagement. She believed in the future of my
works, recognised the peculiarity of my position, as well as the correctness
of my calculations, and declared her willingness to provide the necessary
capital for the publication of my operas, refusing to consider the act as one
involving any sacrifice on her part. This money she proposed to get by
selling out her investments in Polish state-bonds, and I was to pay the
customary rate of interest. The thing was so easily done, and seemed so
much a matter of course, that I at once made all needful arrangements with
my Leipzig printer, and set to work on the publication of my operas.
When the amount of work delivered brought with it a demand for
considerable payments on account, I approached my friend for a first
advance. And here I became confronted with a new phase of that famous
lady’s life, which placed me in a position which proved as disastrous as it
was unexpected. After having broken away from the unlucky Herr von
Munchhausen some time previously, and returned, as it appeared, with
penitential ardour to her former connection with my friend, Hermann
Muller, it now turned out that she had found no real satisfaction in this fresh
relationship. On the contrary, the star of her being, whom she had so long
and ardently desired, had now at last arisen in the person of another
lieutenant of the Guards. With a vehemence which made light of her
treachery to her old friend, she elected this slim young man, whose moral
and intellectual weaknesses were patent to every eye, as the chosen
keystone of her life’s love. He took the good luck that befell him so
seriously, that he would brook no jesting, and at once laid hands on the
fortune of his future wife, as he considered that it was disadvantageously
publishers on the understanding that they should receive a commission of
ten per cent, whilst I provided the necessary capital.
As there were two operas to be issued, including Rienzi, a work of
exceptional bulk, it was not likely that these publications would prove very
profitable unless, in addition to the usual piano selections, I also published
adaptations, such as the music without words, for duet or solo. For this a
fairly large capital was necessary. I also needed funds for the repayment of
the loans already mentioned, and for the settlement of old debts, as well as
to pay off the remaining expenses of my house-furnishing. I was therefore
obliged to try and procure much larger sums. I laid my project and its
motive before Schroder-Devrient, who had just returned to Dresden, at
Easter, 1844, to fulfil a fresh engagement. She believed in the future of my
works, recognised the peculiarity of my position, as well as the correctness
of my calculations, and declared her willingness to provide the necessary
capital for the publication of my operas, refusing to consider the act as one
involving any sacrifice on her part. This money she proposed to get by
selling out her investments in Polish state-bonds, and I was to pay the
customary rate of interest. The thing was so easily done, and seemed so
much a matter of course, that I at once made all needful arrangements with
my Leipzig printer, and set to work on the publication of my operas.
When the amount of work delivered brought with it a demand for
considerable payments on account, I approached my friend for a first
advance. And here I became confronted with a new phase of that famous
lady’s life, which placed me in a position which proved as disastrous as it
was unexpected. After having broken away from the unlucky Herr von
Munchhausen some time previously, and returned, as it appeared, with
penitential ardour to her former connection with my friend, Hermann
Muller, it now turned out that she had found no real satisfaction in this fresh
relationship. On the contrary, the star of her being, whom she had so long
and ardently desired, had now at last arisen in the person of another
lieutenant of the Guards. With a vehemence which made light of her
treachery to her old friend, she elected this slim young man, whose moral
and intellectual weaknesses were patent to every eye, as the chosen
keystone of her life’s love. He took the good luck that befell him so
seriously, that he would brook no jesting, and at once laid hands on the
fortune of his future wife, as he considered that it was disadvantageously
Page 299
and insecurely invested, and thought that he knew of much more profitable
ways of employing it. My friend therefore explained, with much pain and
evident embarrassment, that she had renounced all control over her capital,
and was unable to keep her promise to me.
Owing to this I entered upon a series of entanglements and troubles
which henceforth dominated my life, and plunged me into sorrows that left
their dismal mark on all my subsequent enterprises. It was clear that I could
not now abandon the proposed plan of publication. The only satisfactory
solution of my perplexities was to be found in the execution of my project
and the success which I hoped would attend it. I was compelled, therefore,
to turn all my energies to the raising of the money wherewith to publish my
two operas, to which in all probability Tannhäuser would shortly have to be
added. I first applied to my friends, and in some cases had to pay exorbitant
rates of interest, even for short terms. For the present these details are
sufficient to prepare the reader for the catastrophe towards which I was now
inevitably drifting.
The hopelessness of my position did not at first reveal itself. There
seemed no reason to despair of the eventual spread of my operatic works
among the theatres in Germany, though my experience of them indicated
that the process would be slow. In spite of the depressing experiences in
Berlin and Hamburg, there were many encouraging signs to be seen. Above
all, Rienzi maintained its position in favour of the people of Dresden, a
place which undoubtedly occupied a position of great importance,
especially during the summer months, when so many strangers from all
parts of the world pass through it. My opera, which was not to be heard
anywhere else, was in great request, both among the Germans and other
visitors, and was always received with marked approbation, which surprised
me very much. Thus a performance of Rienzi, especially in summer,
became quite a Dionysian revelry, whose effect upon me could not fail to be
encouraging.
On one occasion Liszt was among the number of these visitors. As Rienzi
did not happen to be in the repertoire when he arrived, he induced the
management at his earnest request to arrange a special performance. I met
him between the acts in Tichatschek’s dressing-room, and was heartily
encouraged and touched by his almost enthusiastic appreciation, expressed
in his most emphatic manner. The kind of life to which Liszt was at that
ways of employing it. My friend therefore explained, with much pain and
evident embarrassment, that she had renounced all control over her capital,
and was unable to keep her promise to me.
Owing to this I entered upon a series of entanglements and troubles
which henceforth dominated my life, and plunged me into sorrows that left
their dismal mark on all my subsequent enterprises. It was clear that I could
not now abandon the proposed plan of publication. The only satisfactory
solution of my perplexities was to be found in the execution of my project
and the success which I hoped would attend it. I was compelled, therefore,
to turn all my energies to the raising of the money wherewith to publish my
two operas, to which in all probability Tannhäuser would shortly have to be
added. I first applied to my friends, and in some cases had to pay exorbitant
rates of interest, even for short terms. For the present these details are
sufficient to prepare the reader for the catastrophe towards which I was now
inevitably drifting.
The hopelessness of my position did not at first reveal itself. There
seemed no reason to despair of the eventual spread of my operatic works
among the theatres in Germany, though my experience of them indicated
that the process would be slow. In spite of the depressing experiences in
Berlin and Hamburg, there were many encouraging signs to be seen. Above
all, Rienzi maintained its position in favour of the people of Dresden, a
place which undoubtedly occupied a position of great importance,
especially during the summer months, when so many strangers from all
parts of the world pass through it. My opera, which was not to be heard
anywhere else, was in great request, both among the Germans and other
visitors, and was always received with marked approbation, which surprised
me very much. Thus a performance of Rienzi, especially in summer,
became quite a Dionysian revelry, whose effect upon me could not fail to be
encouraging.
On one occasion Liszt was among the number of these visitors. As Rienzi
did not happen to be in the repertoire when he arrived, he induced the
management at his earnest request to arrange a special performance. I met
him between the acts in Tichatschek’s dressing-room, and was heartily
encouraged and touched by his almost enthusiastic appreciation, expressed
in his most emphatic manner. The kind of life to which Liszt was at that
Page 300
time condemned, and which bound him to a perpetual environment of
distracting and exciting elements, debarred us from all more intimate and
fruitful intercourse. Yet from this time onward I continued to receive
constant testimonies of the profound and lasting impression I had made
upon him, as well as of his sympathetic remembrance of me. From various
parts of the world, wherever his triumphal progress led him, people, chiefly
of the upper classes, came to Dresden for the purpose of hearing Rienzi.
They had been so interested by Liszt’s reports of my work, and by his
playing of various selections from it, that they all came expecting
something of unparalleled importance.
Besides these indications of Liszt’s enthusiastic and friendly sympathy,
other deeply touching testimonies appeared from different quarters. The
startling beginning made by Werder, on the occasion of his midnight visit
after the second performance of the Fliegender Holländer in Berlin, was
shortly afterwards followed by a similarly unsolicited approach in the form
of an effusive letter from an equally unknown personage, Alwino
Frommann, who afterwards became my faithful friend. After my departure
from Berlin she heard Schroder-Devrient twice in the Fliegender Holländer,
and the letter in which she described the effect produced upon her by my
work conveyed to me for the first time the vigorous and profound
sentiments of a deep and confident recognition such as seldom falls to the
lot of even the greatest master, and cannot fail to exercise a weighty
influence on his mind and spirit, which long for self-confidence.
I have no very vivid recollections of my own doings during this first year
of my position as conductor in a sphere of action which gradually grew
more and more familiar. For the anniversary of my appointment, and to
some extent as a personal recognition, I was commissioned to procure
Gluck’s Armida. This we performed in March, 1843, with the co-operation
of Schroder-Devrient, just before her temporary departure from Dresden.
Great importance was attached to this production, because, at the same
moment, Meyerbeer was inaugurating his general-directorship in Berlin by
a performance of the same work. Indeed, it was in Berlin that the
extraordinary respect entertained for such a commemoration of Gluck had
its origin. I was told that Meyerbeer went to Rellstab with the score of
Armida in order to obtain hints as to its correct interpretation.
distracting and exciting elements, debarred us from all more intimate and
fruitful intercourse. Yet from this time onward I continued to receive
constant testimonies of the profound and lasting impression I had made
upon him, as well as of his sympathetic remembrance of me. From various
parts of the world, wherever his triumphal progress led him, people, chiefly
of the upper classes, came to Dresden for the purpose of hearing Rienzi.
They had been so interested by Liszt’s reports of my work, and by his
playing of various selections from it, that they all came expecting
something of unparalleled importance.
Besides these indications of Liszt’s enthusiastic and friendly sympathy,
other deeply touching testimonies appeared from different quarters. The
startling beginning made by Werder, on the occasion of his midnight visit
after the second performance of the Fliegender Holländer in Berlin, was
shortly afterwards followed by a similarly unsolicited approach in the form
of an effusive letter from an equally unknown personage, Alwino
Frommann, who afterwards became my faithful friend. After my departure
from Berlin she heard Schroder-Devrient twice in the Fliegender Holländer,
and the letter in which she described the effect produced upon her by my
work conveyed to me for the first time the vigorous and profound
sentiments of a deep and confident recognition such as seldom falls to the
lot of even the greatest master, and cannot fail to exercise a weighty
influence on his mind and spirit, which long for self-confidence.
I have no very vivid recollections of my own doings during this first year
of my position as conductor in a sphere of action which gradually grew
more and more familiar. For the anniversary of my appointment, and to
some extent as a personal recognition, I was commissioned to procure
Gluck’s Armida. This we performed in March, 1843, with the co-operation
of Schroder-Devrient, just before her temporary departure from Dresden.
Great importance was attached to this production, because, at the same
moment, Meyerbeer was inaugurating his general-directorship in Berlin by
a performance of the same work. Indeed, it was in Berlin that the
extraordinary respect entertained for such a commemoration of Gluck had
its origin. I was told that Meyerbeer went to Rellstab with the score of
Armida in order to obtain hints as to its correct interpretation.
Page 301
As not long afterwards I also heard a strange story of two silver
candlesticks, wherewith the famous composer was said, to have enlightened
the no less famous critic when showing him the score of his Feldlager in
Schlesien, I decided to attach no great importance to the instructions he
might have received, but rather to help myself by a careful handling of this
difficult score, and by introducing some softness into it through modulating
the variations in tone as much as possible. I had the gratification later of
receiving an exceedingly warm appreciation of my rendering from Herr
Eduard Devrient, a great Gluck connoisseur. After hearing this opera as
presented by us, and comparing it with the Berlin performance, he heartily
praised the tenderly modulated character of our rendering of certain parts,
which, he said, had been given in Berlin with the coarsest bluntness. He
mentioned, as a striking instance of this, a brief chorus in C major of male
and female nymphs in the third act. By the introduction of a more moderate
tempo and very soft piano I had tried to free this from the original
coarseness with which Devrient had heard it rendered in Berlin—
presumably with traditional fidelity. My most innocent device, and one
which I frequently adopted, for disguising the irritating stiffness or the
orchestral movement in the original, was a careful modification of the
Basso-continuo, which was taken uninterruptedly in common time. This I
felt obliged to remedy, partly by legato playing, and partly by pizzicato.
Our management were lavish in their expenditure on externals, especially
decoration, and as a spectacular opera the piece drew fairly large houses,
thus earning me the reputation of being a very suitable conductor for Gluck,
and one who was in close sympathy with him. This result was the more
conspicuous from the fact that Iphigenia in Tauris which is a far superior
work, and in which Devrient’s interpretation of the title-role was admirable
had been performed to empty houses.
I had to live upon this reputation for a long time, as it often happened that
I was compelled to give inferior performances of repertoire pieces,
including Mozart’s operas. The mediocrity of these was particularly
disappointing to those who, after my success in Armida, had expected a
great deal from my rendering of these pieces, and were much disappointed
in consequence. Even sympathetic hearers sought to explain their
disappointment on the ground that I did not appreciate Mozart and could
not understand him. But they failed to realise how impossible it was for me,
as a mere conductor, to exercise any real influence on such desultory
candlesticks, wherewith the famous composer was said, to have enlightened
the no less famous critic when showing him the score of his Feldlager in
Schlesien, I decided to attach no great importance to the instructions he
might have received, but rather to help myself by a careful handling of this
difficult score, and by introducing some softness into it through modulating
the variations in tone as much as possible. I had the gratification later of
receiving an exceedingly warm appreciation of my rendering from Herr
Eduard Devrient, a great Gluck connoisseur. After hearing this opera as
presented by us, and comparing it with the Berlin performance, he heartily
praised the tenderly modulated character of our rendering of certain parts,
which, he said, had been given in Berlin with the coarsest bluntness. He
mentioned, as a striking instance of this, a brief chorus in C major of male
and female nymphs in the third act. By the introduction of a more moderate
tempo and very soft piano I had tried to free this from the original
coarseness with which Devrient had heard it rendered in Berlin—
presumably with traditional fidelity. My most innocent device, and one
which I frequently adopted, for disguising the irritating stiffness or the
orchestral movement in the original, was a careful modification of the
Basso-continuo, which was taken uninterruptedly in common time. This I
felt obliged to remedy, partly by legato playing, and partly by pizzicato.
Our management were lavish in their expenditure on externals, especially
decoration, and as a spectacular opera the piece drew fairly large houses,
thus earning me the reputation of being a very suitable conductor for Gluck,
and one who was in close sympathy with him. This result was the more
conspicuous from the fact that Iphigenia in Tauris which is a far superior
work, and in which Devrient’s interpretation of the title-role was admirable
had been performed to empty houses.
I had to live upon this reputation for a long time, as it often happened that
I was compelled to give inferior performances of repertoire pieces,
including Mozart’s operas. The mediocrity of these was particularly
disappointing to those who, after my success in Armida, had expected a
great deal from my rendering of these pieces, and were much disappointed
in consequence. Even sympathetic hearers sought to explain their
disappointment on the ground that I did not appreciate Mozart and could
not understand him. But they failed to realise how impossible it was for me,
as a mere conductor, to exercise any real influence on such desultory
Page 302
performances, which were merely given as stopgaps, and often without
rehearsal. Indeed, in this matter I often found myself in a false position,
which, as I was powerless to remedy it, contributed not a little to render
unbearable both my new office and my dependence upon the meanest
motives of a paltry theatrical routine, already overweighted with the cares
of business. This, in fact, became worse than I had expected, in spite of my
previous knowledge of the precariousness of such a life. My colleague
Reissiger, to whom from time to time I poured out my woes regarding the
scant attention given by the general management to our demands for the
maintenance of correct representations in the realm of opera, comforted me
by saying that I, like himself, would sooner or later relinquish all these fads
and submit to the inevitable fate of a conductor. Thereupon he proudly
smote his stomach, and hoped that I might soon be able to boast of one as
round as his own.
I received further provocation for my growing dislike of these jog-trot
methods from a closer acquaintance with the spirit in which even eminent
conductors undertook the reproduction of our masterpieces. During this first
year Mendelssohn was invited to conduct his St. Paul for one of the Palm
Sunday concerts in the Dresden chapel, which was famous at that time. The
knowledge I thus acquired of this work, under such favourable
circumstances, pleased me so much, that I made a fresh attempt to approach
the composer with sincere and friendly motives; but a remarkable
conversation which I had with him on the evening of this performance
quickly and strangely repelled my impulse. After the oratorio Reissiger was
to produce Beethoven’s Eighth Symphony. I had noticed in the preceding
rehearsal that Keissiger had fallen into the error of all the ordinary
conductors of this work by taking the tempo di minuetto of the third
movement at a meaningless waltz time, whereby not only does the whole
piece lose its imposing character, but the trio is rendered absolutely
ridiculous by the impossibility of the violoncello part being interpreted at
such a speed. I had called Reissiger’s attention to this defect, and he
acquiesced in my opinion, promising to take the part in question at true
minuetto tempo. I related this to Mendelssohn, when he was resting after
his own performance in the box beside me, listening to the symphony. He,
too, acknowledged that I was right, and thought that it ought to be played as
I said. And now the third movement began. Reissiger, who, it is true, did
not possess the needful power suddenly to impress so momentous a change
rehearsal. Indeed, in this matter I often found myself in a false position,
which, as I was powerless to remedy it, contributed not a little to render
unbearable both my new office and my dependence upon the meanest
motives of a paltry theatrical routine, already overweighted with the cares
of business. This, in fact, became worse than I had expected, in spite of my
previous knowledge of the precariousness of such a life. My colleague
Reissiger, to whom from time to time I poured out my woes regarding the
scant attention given by the general management to our demands for the
maintenance of correct representations in the realm of opera, comforted me
by saying that I, like himself, would sooner or later relinquish all these fads
and submit to the inevitable fate of a conductor. Thereupon he proudly
smote his stomach, and hoped that I might soon be able to boast of one as
round as his own.
I received further provocation for my growing dislike of these jog-trot
methods from a closer acquaintance with the spirit in which even eminent
conductors undertook the reproduction of our masterpieces. During this first
year Mendelssohn was invited to conduct his St. Paul for one of the Palm
Sunday concerts in the Dresden chapel, which was famous at that time. The
knowledge I thus acquired of this work, under such favourable
circumstances, pleased me so much, that I made a fresh attempt to approach
the composer with sincere and friendly motives; but a remarkable
conversation which I had with him on the evening of this performance
quickly and strangely repelled my impulse. After the oratorio Reissiger was
to produce Beethoven’s Eighth Symphony. I had noticed in the preceding
rehearsal that Keissiger had fallen into the error of all the ordinary
conductors of this work by taking the tempo di minuetto of the third
movement at a meaningless waltz time, whereby not only does the whole
piece lose its imposing character, but the trio is rendered absolutely
ridiculous by the impossibility of the violoncello part being interpreted at
such a speed. I had called Reissiger’s attention to this defect, and he
acquiesced in my opinion, promising to take the part in question at true
minuetto tempo. I related this to Mendelssohn, when he was resting after
his own performance in the box beside me, listening to the symphony. He,
too, acknowledged that I was right, and thought that it ought to be played as
I said. And now the third movement began. Reissiger, who, it is true, did
not possess the needful power suddenly to impress so momentous a change
Page 303
of time upon his orchestra with success, followed the usual custom and took
the tempo di minuetto in the same old waltz time. Just as I was about to
express my anger, Mendelssohn gave me a friendly nod, as though he
thought that this was what I wanted, and that I had understood the music in
this way. I was so amazed by this complete absence of feeling on the part of
the famous musician, that I was struck dumb, and thenceforth my own
particular opinion of Mendelssohn gradually matured, an opinion which
was afterwards confirmed by R. Schumann. The latter, in expressing the
sincere pleasure he had felt on listening to the time at which I had taken the
first movement of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, told me that he had been
compelled to hear it year after year taken by Mendelssohn at a perfectly
distracting speed.
Amid my yearning anxiety to exert some influence upon the spirit in
which our noblest masterpieces were executed, I had to struggle against the
profound dissatisfaction I felt with my employment on the ordinary theatre
repertoire. It was not until Palm Sunday of the year 1844, just after my
dispiriting expedition to Hamburg, that my desire to conduct the Pastoral
Symphony was satisfied. But many faults still remained unremedied, and
for the removal of these I had to adopt indirect methods which gave me
much trouble. For instance, at these famous concerts the arrangement of the
orchestra, the members of which were seated in a long, thin, semicircular
row round the chorus of singers, was so inconceivably stupid that it
required the explanation given by Reissiger to make me understand such
folly. He told me that all these arrangements dated from the time of the late
conductor Morlacchi, who, as an Italian composer of operas, had no true
realisation of the importance of the orchestra nor of its necessities. When,
therefore, I asked why they had permitted him to meddle with things he did
not understand, I learned that the preference shown to this Italian, both by
the court and the general management, even in opposition to Carl Maria von
Weber, had always been absolute and brooked no contradiction. I was
warned that, even now, we should experience great difficulty in ridding
ourselves of these inherited vices, because the opinion still prevailed in the
highest circles that he must have understood best what he was about.
Once more my childish memories of the eunuch Sassaroli flashed
through my mind, and I remembered the warning of Weber’s widow as to
the significance of my succession to her husband’s post of conductor in
Dresden. But, in spite of all this, our performance of the Pastoral Symphony
the tempo di minuetto in the same old waltz time. Just as I was about to
express my anger, Mendelssohn gave me a friendly nod, as though he
thought that this was what I wanted, and that I had understood the music in
this way. I was so amazed by this complete absence of feeling on the part of
the famous musician, that I was struck dumb, and thenceforth my own
particular opinion of Mendelssohn gradually matured, an opinion which
was afterwards confirmed by R. Schumann. The latter, in expressing the
sincere pleasure he had felt on listening to the time at which I had taken the
first movement of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, told me that he had been
compelled to hear it year after year taken by Mendelssohn at a perfectly
distracting speed.
Amid my yearning anxiety to exert some influence upon the spirit in
which our noblest masterpieces were executed, I had to struggle against the
profound dissatisfaction I felt with my employment on the ordinary theatre
repertoire. It was not until Palm Sunday of the year 1844, just after my
dispiriting expedition to Hamburg, that my desire to conduct the Pastoral
Symphony was satisfied. But many faults still remained unremedied, and
for the removal of these I had to adopt indirect methods which gave me
much trouble. For instance, at these famous concerts the arrangement of the
orchestra, the members of which were seated in a long, thin, semicircular
row round the chorus of singers, was so inconceivably stupid that it
required the explanation given by Reissiger to make me understand such
folly. He told me that all these arrangements dated from the time of the late
conductor Morlacchi, who, as an Italian composer of operas, had no true
realisation of the importance of the orchestra nor of its necessities. When,
therefore, I asked why they had permitted him to meddle with things he did
not understand, I learned that the preference shown to this Italian, both by
the court and the general management, even in opposition to Carl Maria von
Weber, had always been absolute and brooked no contradiction. I was
warned that, even now, we should experience great difficulty in ridding
ourselves of these inherited vices, because the opinion still prevailed in the
highest circles that he must have understood best what he was about.
Once more my childish memories of the eunuch Sassaroli flashed
through my mind, and I remembered the warning of Weber’s widow as to
the significance of my succession to her husband’s post of conductor in
Dresden. But, in spite of all this, our performance of the Pastoral Symphony
Page 304
succeeded beyond expectation, and the incomparable and wonderfully
stimulating enjoyment, which I was in future to derive from my intercourse
with Beethoven’s works, now first enabled me to realise his prolific
strength. Kockel shared in this enjoyment with heartfelt sympathy; he
supported me with eye and ear at every rehearsal, always stood by my side,
and was at one with me both in his appreciation and his aims.
After this encouraging success I was to receive the gratification of
another triumph in the summer, which, although it was of no particular
moment from the musical point of view, was of great social importance.
The King of Saxony, towards whom, as I have already said, I had felt
warmly drawn when he was Prince Friedrich, was expected home from a
long visit to England. The reports received of his stay there had greatly
rejoiced my patriotic soul. While this homely monarch, who shrank from all
pomp and noisy demonstration, was in England, it happened that the Tsar
Nicholas arrived quite unexpectedly on a visit to the Queen. In his honour
great festivities and military reviews were held, in which our King, much
against his will, was obliged to participate, and he was consequently
compelled to receive the enthusiastic acclamations of the English crowd,
who were most demonstrative in showing their preference for him, as
compared with the unpopular Tsar. This preference was also reflected in the
newspapers, so that a flattering incense floated over from England to our
little Saxony which filled us all with a peculiar pride in our King. While I
was in this mood, which absorbed me completely, I learned that
preparations were being made in Leipzig for a special welcome to the King
on his return, which was to be further dignified by a musical festival in the
directing of which Mendelssohn was to take part. I made inquiries as to
what was going to be done in Dresden, and learned that the King did not
propose to call there at all, but was going direct to his summer residence at
Pillnitz.
A moment’s reflection showed me that this would only further my desire
of preparing a pleasant and hearty reception for his Majesty. As I was a
servant of the Crown, any attempt on my part to render an act of homage in
Dresden might have had the appearance of an official parade which would
not be admissible. I seized the idea, therefore, of hurriedly collecting
together all who could either play or sing, so that we might perform a
Reception song hastily composed in honour of the event. The obstacle to
my plan was that my Director Lüttichau was away at one of his country
stimulating enjoyment, which I was in future to derive from my intercourse
with Beethoven’s works, now first enabled me to realise his prolific
strength. Kockel shared in this enjoyment with heartfelt sympathy; he
supported me with eye and ear at every rehearsal, always stood by my side,
and was at one with me both in his appreciation and his aims.
After this encouraging success I was to receive the gratification of
another triumph in the summer, which, although it was of no particular
moment from the musical point of view, was of great social importance.
The King of Saxony, towards whom, as I have already said, I had felt
warmly drawn when he was Prince Friedrich, was expected home from a
long visit to England. The reports received of his stay there had greatly
rejoiced my patriotic soul. While this homely monarch, who shrank from all
pomp and noisy demonstration, was in England, it happened that the Tsar
Nicholas arrived quite unexpectedly on a visit to the Queen. In his honour
great festivities and military reviews were held, in which our King, much
against his will, was obliged to participate, and he was consequently
compelled to receive the enthusiastic acclamations of the English crowd,
who were most demonstrative in showing their preference for him, as
compared with the unpopular Tsar. This preference was also reflected in the
newspapers, so that a flattering incense floated over from England to our
little Saxony which filled us all with a peculiar pride in our King. While I
was in this mood, which absorbed me completely, I learned that
preparations were being made in Leipzig for a special welcome to the King
on his return, which was to be further dignified by a musical festival in the
directing of which Mendelssohn was to take part. I made inquiries as to
what was going to be done in Dresden, and learned that the King did not
propose to call there at all, but was going direct to his summer residence at
Pillnitz.
A moment’s reflection showed me that this would only further my desire
of preparing a pleasant and hearty reception for his Majesty. As I was a
servant of the Crown, any attempt on my part to render an act of homage in
Dresden might have had the appearance of an official parade which would
not be admissible. I seized the idea, therefore, of hurriedly collecting
together all who could either play or sing, so that we might perform a
Reception song hastily composed in honour of the event. The obstacle to
my plan was that my Director Lüttichau was away at one of his country
Page 305
seats. To come to an understanding with my colleague Reissiger would,
moreover, have involved delay, and given the enterprise the very aspect of
an official ovation which I wished to avoid. As no time was to be lost, if
anything worthy of the occasion was to be done—as the King was due to
arrive in a few days—I availed myself of my position as conductor of the
Glee Club, and summoned all its singers and instrumentalists to my aid. In
addition to these, I invited the members of our theatrical company, and also
those of the orchestra, to join us. This done, I drove quickly to Pillnitz to
arrange matters with the Lord Chamberlain, whom I found favourably
disposed towards my project. The only leisure I could snatch for composing
the verses of my song and setting them to music was during the rapid drive
there and back, for by the time I reached home I had to have every thing
ready for the copyist and lithographer. The agreeable sensation of rushing
through the warm summer air and lovely country, coupled with the sincere
affection with which I was inspired for our German Prince, and which had
prompted my effort, elated me and worked me up to a high pitch of tension,
in which I now formed a clear conception of the lyrical outlines of the
‘Tannhäuser March,’ which first saw the light of day on the occasion of this
royal welcome. I soon afterwards developed this theme, and thus produced
the march which became the most popular of the melodies I had hitherto
composed.
On the next day it had to be tried over with a hundred and twenty
instrumentalists and three hundred singers. I had taken the liberty of
inviting them to meet me on the stage of the Court Theatre, where
everything went off capitally. Every one was delighted, and I not the least
so, when a messenger arrived from the director, who had just returned to
town, requesting an immediate interview. Littichau was enraged beyond
measure at my high-handed proceedings in this matter, of which he had
been informed by our good friend Reissiger. If his baronial coronet had
been on his head during this interview, it would assuredly have tumbled off.
The fact that I should have conducted my negotiations in person with the
court officials, and could report that my endeavours had met with
extraordinarily prompt success, aroused his deepest fury, for the chief
importance of his own position consisted in always representing everything
which had to be obtained by these means as surrounded by the greatest
obstacles, and hedged in by the strictest etiquette. I offered to cancel
everything, but that only embarrassed him the more. I thereupon asked him
moreover, have involved delay, and given the enterprise the very aspect of
an official ovation which I wished to avoid. As no time was to be lost, if
anything worthy of the occasion was to be done—as the King was due to
arrive in a few days—I availed myself of my position as conductor of the
Glee Club, and summoned all its singers and instrumentalists to my aid. In
addition to these, I invited the members of our theatrical company, and also
those of the orchestra, to join us. This done, I drove quickly to Pillnitz to
arrange matters with the Lord Chamberlain, whom I found favourably
disposed towards my project. The only leisure I could snatch for composing
the verses of my song and setting them to music was during the rapid drive
there and back, for by the time I reached home I had to have every thing
ready for the copyist and lithographer. The agreeable sensation of rushing
through the warm summer air and lovely country, coupled with the sincere
affection with which I was inspired for our German Prince, and which had
prompted my effort, elated me and worked me up to a high pitch of tension,
in which I now formed a clear conception of the lyrical outlines of the
‘Tannhäuser March,’ which first saw the light of day on the occasion of this
royal welcome. I soon afterwards developed this theme, and thus produced
the march which became the most popular of the melodies I had hitherto
composed.
On the next day it had to be tried over with a hundred and twenty
instrumentalists and three hundred singers. I had taken the liberty of
inviting them to meet me on the stage of the Court Theatre, where
everything went off capitally. Every one was delighted, and I not the least
so, when a messenger arrived from the director, who had just returned to
town, requesting an immediate interview. Littichau was enraged beyond
measure at my high-handed proceedings in this matter, of which he had
been informed by our good friend Reissiger. If his baronial coronet had
been on his head during this interview, it would assuredly have tumbled off.
The fact that I should have conducted my negotiations in person with the
court officials, and could report that my endeavours had met with
extraordinarily prompt success, aroused his deepest fury, for the chief
importance of his own position consisted in always representing everything
which had to be obtained by these means as surrounded by the greatest
obstacles, and hedged in by the strictest etiquette. I offered to cancel
everything, but that only embarrassed him the more. I thereupon asked him
Page 306
what he wanted me to do, if the plan was still to be carried out. On this
point he seemed uncertain, but thought I had shown a great lack of fellow-
feeling in having not only ignored him, but Reissiger as well. I answered
that I was perfectly ready to hand over my composition and the conducting
of the piece to Reissiger. But he could not swallow this, as he really had an
exceedingly poor opinion of Reissiger, of which I was very well aware. His
real grievance was that I had arranged the whole business with the Lord
Chamberlain, Herr von Reizenstein, who was his personal enemy, and he
added that I could form no conception of the rudeness he had been obliged
to endure from the hands of this official. This outburst of confidence made
it easier for me to exhibit an almost sincere emotion, to which he responded
by a shrug of the shoulders, meaning that he must resign himself to a
disagreeable necessity.
But my project was even more seriously threatened by the wretched
weather than by this storm with the director; for it rained all day in torrents.
If it lasted, which it seemed only too likely to do, I could hardly start on the
special boat at five o’clock in the morning, as proposed, with my hundreds
of helpers, to give an early morning concert at Pillnitz, two hours away. I
anticipated such a disaster with genuine dismay. But Röckel consoled me
by saying that I could rely upon it that we should have glorious weather the
next day; for I was lucky! This belief in my luck has followed me ever
since, even down to my latest days; and amid the great misfortunes which
have so often hampered my enterprises, I have felt as if this statement were
a wicked insult to fate. But this time, at least, my friend was right; the 12th
of August, 1844 was from sunrise till late at night the most perfect summer
day that I can remember in my whole life. The sensation of blissful content
with which I saw my light-hearted legion of gaily dressed bandsmen and
singers gathering through the auspicious morning mists on board our
steamer, swelled my breast with a fervent faith in my lucky star.
By my friendly impetuosity I had succeeded in overcoming Reissiger’s
smouldering resentment, and had persuaded him to share the honour of our
undertaking by conducting the performance of my composition himself.
When we arrived at the spot, everything went off splendidly. The King and
royal family were visibly touched, and in the evil times that followed the
Queen of Saxony spoke of this occasion, I am told, with peculiar emotion,
as the fairest day of her life. After Reissiger had wielded his baton with
great dignity, and I had sung with the tenors in the choir, we two conductors
point he seemed uncertain, but thought I had shown a great lack of fellow-
feeling in having not only ignored him, but Reissiger as well. I answered
that I was perfectly ready to hand over my composition and the conducting
of the piece to Reissiger. But he could not swallow this, as he really had an
exceedingly poor opinion of Reissiger, of which I was very well aware. His
real grievance was that I had arranged the whole business with the Lord
Chamberlain, Herr von Reizenstein, who was his personal enemy, and he
added that I could form no conception of the rudeness he had been obliged
to endure from the hands of this official. This outburst of confidence made
it easier for me to exhibit an almost sincere emotion, to which he responded
by a shrug of the shoulders, meaning that he must resign himself to a
disagreeable necessity.
But my project was even more seriously threatened by the wretched
weather than by this storm with the director; for it rained all day in torrents.
If it lasted, which it seemed only too likely to do, I could hardly start on the
special boat at five o’clock in the morning, as proposed, with my hundreds
of helpers, to give an early morning concert at Pillnitz, two hours away. I
anticipated such a disaster with genuine dismay. But Röckel consoled me
by saying that I could rely upon it that we should have glorious weather the
next day; for I was lucky! This belief in my luck has followed me ever
since, even down to my latest days; and amid the great misfortunes which
have so often hampered my enterprises, I have felt as if this statement were
a wicked insult to fate. But this time, at least, my friend was right; the 12th
of August, 1844 was from sunrise till late at night the most perfect summer
day that I can remember in my whole life. The sensation of blissful content
with which I saw my light-hearted legion of gaily dressed bandsmen and
singers gathering through the auspicious morning mists on board our
steamer, swelled my breast with a fervent faith in my lucky star.
By my friendly impetuosity I had succeeded in overcoming Reissiger’s
smouldering resentment, and had persuaded him to share the honour of our
undertaking by conducting the performance of my composition himself.
When we arrived at the spot, everything went off splendidly. The King and
royal family were visibly touched, and in the evil times that followed the
Queen of Saxony spoke of this occasion, I am told, with peculiar emotion,
as the fairest day of her life. After Reissiger had wielded his baton with
great dignity, and I had sung with the tenors in the choir, we two conductors
Page 307
were summoned to the presence of the royal family. The King warmly
expressed his thanks, while the Queen paid us the high compliment of
saying that I composed very well and that Reissiger conducted very well.
His Majesty asked us to repeat the last three stanzas only, as, owing to a
painful ulcerated tooth, he could not remain much longer out of doors. I
rapidly devised a combined evolution, the remarkably successful execution
of which I am very proud, even to this day. I had the entire song repeated,
but, in accordance with the King’s wish, only one verse was sung in our
original crescent formation. At the beginning of the second verse I made my
four hundred undisciplined bandsmen and singers file off in a march
through the garden, which, as they gradually receded, was so arranged that
the final notes could only reach the royal ear as an echoing dream-song.
Thanks to my unexampled activity and ever-present help, this retreat was so
steadily carried out that not the slightest faltering was perceptible either in
time or delivery, and the whole might have been taken for a carefully
rehearsed theatrical manœuvre. On reaching the castle court we found that,
by the Queen’s kindly forethought, an ample breakfast had been provided
for our party on the lawn, where the tables were already spread. We often
saw our royal hostess herself busily supervising the attendants, or moving
with excited delight about the windows and corridors of the castle. Every
eye beamed rapture to my soul, as the successful author of the general
happiness, and I almost felt amid the glories of that day as though the
millennium had been proclaimed. After roaming in a body through the
lovely grounds of the castle, and not omitting to pay a visit to the
Keppgrund which had been so dear to me in my youth, we returned late at
night, and in the highest spirits, to Dresden.
Next morning I was again summoned to the presence of the director. But
a change had come over him during the night.
As I began to offer my apologies for the anxiety I had caused him, the tall
thin man, with the hard dry face, seized me by the hand and addressed me
with a rapturous expression, which I am sure no one else ever saw on his
face. He told me to say no more about these anxieties. I was a great man,
and soon no one would know anything about him, whereas I should be
universally admired and loved. I was deeply moved, and wished only to
express my embarrassment at so unexpected an outburst, when he kindly
interrupted me and sought an escape from his own emotion in good-
humoured confidences. He referred, with a smile, to the self-denial which
expressed his thanks, while the Queen paid us the high compliment of
saying that I composed very well and that Reissiger conducted very well.
His Majesty asked us to repeat the last three stanzas only, as, owing to a
painful ulcerated tooth, he could not remain much longer out of doors. I
rapidly devised a combined evolution, the remarkably successful execution
of which I am very proud, even to this day. I had the entire song repeated,
but, in accordance with the King’s wish, only one verse was sung in our
original crescent formation. At the beginning of the second verse I made my
four hundred undisciplined bandsmen and singers file off in a march
through the garden, which, as they gradually receded, was so arranged that
the final notes could only reach the royal ear as an echoing dream-song.
Thanks to my unexampled activity and ever-present help, this retreat was so
steadily carried out that not the slightest faltering was perceptible either in
time or delivery, and the whole might have been taken for a carefully
rehearsed theatrical manœuvre. On reaching the castle court we found that,
by the Queen’s kindly forethought, an ample breakfast had been provided
for our party on the lawn, where the tables were already spread. We often
saw our royal hostess herself busily supervising the attendants, or moving
with excited delight about the windows and corridors of the castle. Every
eye beamed rapture to my soul, as the successful author of the general
happiness, and I almost felt amid the glories of that day as though the
millennium had been proclaimed. After roaming in a body through the
lovely grounds of the castle, and not omitting to pay a visit to the
Keppgrund which had been so dear to me in my youth, we returned late at
night, and in the highest spirits, to Dresden.
Next morning I was again summoned to the presence of the director. But
a change had come over him during the night.
As I began to offer my apologies for the anxiety I had caused him, the tall
thin man, with the hard dry face, seized me by the hand and addressed me
with a rapturous expression, which I am sure no one else ever saw on his
face. He told me to say no more about these anxieties. I was a great man,
and soon no one would know anything about him, whereas I should be
universally admired and loved. I was deeply moved, and wished only to
express my embarrassment at so unexpected an outburst, when he kindly
interrupted me and sought an escape from his own emotion in good-
humoured confidences. He referred, with a smile, to the self-denial which
Page 308
had yielded the place of honour on so extraordinary an occasion to an
undeserving man like Reissiger. When I assured him that this act had
afforded me the liveliest satisfaction, and that I had myself persuaded my
colleague to take the baton, he confessed that at last he began to understand
me, but failed altogether to comprehend how the other could accept a
position to which he had no right.
Lüttichau’s altered attitude towards me was such that for some time our
intercourse on matters of business assumed an almost confidential tone.
But, unfortunately, in course of time things changed for the worse, so that
our relationship became one of open enmity; nevertheless, a certain peculiar
tenderness towards me on the part of this singular man was always clearly
perceptible. Indeed, I might almost say that much of his subsequent abuse
of me sounded more like the strangely perverted plaints of a love that met
with no response.
For my holiday this year I went, early in September, to Fischer’s
vineyard, near Loschwitz, not far from the famous Firidlater vineyard,
where, somewhat late in the year, I rented a summer residence. Where
under the kindly and strengthening stimulus of six week of open-air life, I
composed my music for the second act of Tannhäuser, which I completed
by the 15th of October. During this period a performance of Rienzi was
given before an audience of no ordinary importance. For this event I went
up to town. Spontini, Meyerbeer, and General Lwoff, the composer of the
Russian National Anthem, were seated together in a stage box. I sought no
opportunity of learning the impression made by my opera upon these
learned judges and magnates of the musical world. It was enough for me to
have the complacent satisfaction of knowing that they had heard my oft-
repeated work performed before a crowded house and amid overwhelming
applause. I was delighted at the close of the opera to have my little dog
Peps, which had run after me all the way from the country, brought to me;
and without waiting to greet the European celebrities, I drove off with it at
once to our quiet vineyard, where Minna was greatly relieved to recover her
little pet, which for hours she had believed to be lost.
Here I also received a visit from Werder, the man whose friendship I had
made in Berlin under such dramatic circumstances. But this time he
appeared in ordinary human guise, beneath the kindly light of heaven, by
which we disputed in a friendly way concerning the true worth of the
undeserving man like Reissiger. When I assured him that this act had
afforded me the liveliest satisfaction, and that I had myself persuaded my
colleague to take the baton, he confessed that at last he began to understand
me, but failed altogether to comprehend how the other could accept a
position to which he had no right.
Lüttichau’s altered attitude towards me was such that for some time our
intercourse on matters of business assumed an almost confidential tone.
But, unfortunately, in course of time things changed for the worse, so that
our relationship became one of open enmity; nevertheless, a certain peculiar
tenderness towards me on the part of this singular man was always clearly
perceptible. Indeed, I might almost say that much of his subsequent abuse
of me sounded more like the strangely perverted plaints of a love that met
with no response.
For my holiday this year I went, early in September, to Fischer’s
vineyard, near Loschwitz, not far from the famous Firidlater vineyard,
where, somewhat late in the year, I rented a summer residence. Where
under the kindly and strengthening stimulus of six week of open-air life, I
composed my music for the second act of Tannhäuser, which I completed
by the 15th of October. During this period a performance of Rienzi was
given before an audience of no ordinary importance. For this event I went
up to town. Spontini, Meyerbeer, and General Lwoff, the composer of the
Russian National Anthem, were seated together in a stage box. I sought no
opportunity of learning the impression made by my opera upon these
learned judges and magnates of the musical world. It was enough for me to
have the complacent satisfaction of knowing that they had heard my oft-
repeated work performed before a crowded house and amid overwhelming
applause. I was delighted at the close of the opera to have my little dog
Peps, which had run after me all the way from the country, brought to me;
and without waiting to greet the European celebrities, I drove off with it at
once to our quiet vineyard, where Minna was greatly relieved to recover her
little pet, which for hours she had believed to be lost.
Here I also received a visit from Werder, the man whose friendship I had
made in Berlin under such dramatic circumstances. But this time he
appeared in ordinary human guise, beneath the kindly light of heaven, by
which we disputed in a friendly way concerning the true worth of the
Page 309
Fliegender Holländer, my mind having somewhat turned against this work
since Tannhäuser had got into my head. It certainly seemed odd to find
myself contradicted on this point by my friend, and to receive instruction
from him on the significance of my own work.
When we returned to our winter quarters I tried to avoid allowing so
lengthy an interval to elapse between the composition of the second and
third acts as had separated that of the first and second. In spite of many
absorbing engagements I succeeded in my aim. By carefully cultivating a
habit of taking solitary walks, and thanks to their soothing influence over
me, I managed to finish the music of Act iii. by the 29th of December, that
is to say, before the end of the year.
During this period my time was otherwise very seriously occupied by a
visit paid us by Spontini with reference to a proposed presentation of his
Vestalin, the preparation for which had just begun. The singular episodes
and characteristic features of the intercourse which I thus gained with this
eminent and hoary-headed master are still so vividly imprinted on my
memory that they seem worthy of a place in this record.
Since, with the co-operation of Schroder-Devrient, we could, on the
whole, rely upon an admirable presentation of the opera, I had inspired
Lüttichau with the idea of inviting Spontini to undertake the personal
superintendence of his justly famous work. He had just left Berlin for ever,
after enduring great humiliation there, and such an invitation at this moment
would be a well-timed proof of respect. This was accordingly sent, and as I
had myself been entrusted with the conductorship of the opera, I was given
the singular task of deciding this point with the master. My letter, it appears,
although written in French, inspired him with a high opinion of my zeal for
the enterprise, and in a gracious reply he informed me what his special
wishes were regarding the arrangements to be made for his collaboration.
As far as the vocalists were concerned, and seeing that a Schroder-Devrient
was among the number, he frankly expressed his satisfaction. As for chorus
and ballet, he took it for granted that nothing would be lacking to the
dignity of the performance; and finally, as regarded the orchestra, he
expected that this also would be sure to please him, as he presumed it
contained the necessary complement of excellent instruments which, to use
his own words, ‘he hoped would furnish the performance with twelve good
contrabass!’ (le tout garni de douze bonnes contre-basses). This phrase
since Tannhäuser had got into my head. It certainly seemed odd to find
myself contradicted on this point by my friend, and to receive instruction
from him on the significance of my own work.
When we returned to our winter quarters I tried to avoid allowing so
lengthy an interval to elapse between the composition of the second and
third acts as had separated that of the first and second. In spite of many
absorbing engagements I succeeded in my aim. By carefully cultivating a
habit of taking solitary walks, and thanks to their soothing influence over
me, I managed to finish the music of Act iii. by the 29th of December, that
is to say, before the end of the year.
During this period my time was otherwise very seriously occupied by a
visit paid us by Spontini with reference to a proposed presentation of his
Vestalin, the preparation for which had just begun. The singular episodes
and characteristic features of the intercourse which I thus gained with this
eminent and hoary-headed master are still so vividly imprinted on my
memory that they seem worthy of a place in this record.
Since, with the co-operation of Schroder-Devrient, we could, on the
whole, rely upon an admirable presentation of the opera, I had inspired
Lüttichau with the idea of inviting Spontini to undertake the personal
superintendence of his justly famous work. He had just left Berlin for ever,
after enduring great humiliation there, and such an invitation at this moment
would be a well-timed proof of respect. This was accordingly sent, and as I
had myself been entrusted with the conductorship of the opera, I was given
the singular task of deciding this point with the master. My letter, it appears,
although written in French, inspired him with a high opinion of my zeal for
the enterprise, and in a gracious reply he informed me what his special
wishes were regarding the arrangements to be made for his collaboration.
As far as the vocalists were concerned, and seeing that a Schroder-Devrient
was among the number, he frankly expressed his satisfaction. As for chorus
and ballet, he took it for granted that nothing would be lacking to the
dignity of the performance; and finally, as regarded the orchestra, he
expected that this also would be sure to please him, as he presumed it
contained the necessary complement of excellent instruments which, to use
his own words, ‘he hoped would furnish the performance with twelve good
contrabass!’ (le tout garni de douze bonnes contre-basses). This phrase
Page 310
bowled me over, for the proportion thus bluntly stated in figures gave me so
logical a conception of his exalted expectations, that I hurried away at once
to the director to warn him that the enterprise on which we had embarked
would not, after all, prove as easy as we thought. His alarm was great, and
he said that some plan must at once be devised for breaking off the
engagement.
When Schroder-Devrient heard of our dilemma, knowing Spontini well,
she laughed as though she would never stop at the ingenuous impudence
with which we had issued our invitation. A trifling indisposition from which
she then suffered provided a reasonable excuse for a delay, more or less
prolonged, and this she generously placed at our disposal. Spontini had, in
fact, urged us to use all possible despatch in the execution of our project,
for, as he was impatiently awaited in Paris, he could spare us but little time.
It fell to my lot to weave the tissue of innocent deceptions by which we
hoped to divert the master from a definite acceptance of our invitation. Now
we could breathe again, and duly began rehearsing. But on the very day
before we proposed to hold our full-dress rehearsal at our leisure, lo and
behold! about noon a carriage drove up to my door, in which, clad in a long
blue coat of pilot-cloth, sat no other than the haughty master himself, whose
manners resembled those of a Spanish grandee. All unattended and greatly
excited, he entered my room, showed me my letters, and proved from our
correspondence that the invitation had not been declined, but that he had in
all points accurately complied with our wishes. Forgetting for the moment
all the possible embarrassments which might arise, in my genuine delight at
beholding the wonderful man before me, and hearing his work conducted
by himself, I at once undertook to do everything I possibly could to meet
his desires. This declaration I made with the utmost sincerity of zeal. He
smiled with almost childlike kindliness on hearing me, and I at once begged
him to conduct the rehearsal arranged for the morrow. He thereupon grew
suddenly thoughtful, and began to weigh the numerous disadvantages of
such an action on his part. So acute did his agitation become that he had the
greatest difficulty in expressing himself clearly on any point, and I found it
no easy matter to inquire what arrangements on our part would persuade
him to undertake the morrow’s rehearsal. After a moment’s reflection he
asked what sort of baton I was accustomed to use when conducting. With
my hands I indicated the approximate length and thickness of a medium-
sized wooden rod, such as our choir-attendant was in the habit of supplying,
logical a conception of his exalted expectations, that I hurried away at once
to the director to warn him that the enterprise on which we had embarked
would not, after all, prove as easy as we thought. His alarm was great, and
he said that some plan must at once be devised for breaking off the
engagement.
When Schroder-Devrient heard of our dilemma, knowing Spontini well,
she laughed as though she would never stop at the ingenuous impudence
with which we had issued our invitation. A trifling indisposition from which
she then suffered provided a reasonable excuse for a delay, more or less
prolonged, and this she generously placed at our disposal. Spontini had, in
fact, urged us to use all possible despatch in the execution of our project,
for, as he was impatiently awaited in Paris, he could spare us but little time.
It fell to my lot to weave the tissue of innocent deceptions by which we
hoped to divert the master from a definite acceptance of our invitation. Now
we could breathe again, and duly began rehearsing. But on the very day
before we proposed to hold our full-dress rehearsal at our leisure, lo and
behold! about noon a carriage drove up to my door, in which, clad in a long
blue coat of pilot-cloth, sat no other than the haughty master himself, whose
manners resembled those of a Spanish grandee. All unattended and greatly
excited, he entered my room, showed me my letters, and proved from our
correspondence that the invitation had not been declined, but that he had in
all points accurately complied with our wishes. Forgetting for the moment
all the possible embarrassments which might arise, in my genuine delight at
beholding the wonderful man before me, and hearing his work conducted
by himself, I at once undertook to do everything I possibly could to meet
his desires. This declaration I made with the utmost sincerity of zeal. He
smiled with almost childlike kindliness on hearing me, and I at once begged
him to conduct the rehearsal arranged for the morrow. He thereupon grew
suddenly thoughtful, and began to weigh the numerous disadvantages of
such an action on his part. So acute did his agitation become that he had the
greatest difficulty in expressing himself clearly on any point, and I found it
no easy matter to inquire what arrangements on our part would persuade
him to undertake the morrow’s rehearsal. After a moment’s reflection he
asked what sort of baton I was accustomed to use when conducting. With
my hands I indicated the approximate length and thickness of a medium-
sized wooden rod, such as our choir-attendant was in the habit of supplying,
Page 311
freshly covered with white paper. He sighed, and asked if I thought it
possible to procure him by to-morrow a baton of black ebony, whose very
respectable length and thickness he indicated by a gesture, and on each end
of which a fairly large knob of ivory was to be affixed. I promised to have
one prepared for the next rehearsal, which should at least be similar in
appearance to what he desired, and another of the specified materials in
time for the actual performance. Visibly relieved, he then passed his hand
over his brow, and granted me permission to announce his consent to
conduct on the following day. After once more strongly enforcing his
instructions as to the baton, he went back to his hotel.
I seemed to be moving in a dream, and hastened in a whirl-wind of
excitement to publish the news of what had happened and was to be
expected. We were fairly trapped. Schroder-Devrient offered to become our
scapegoat, while I entered into precise details with the theatre carpenter
concerning the baton. This turned out so far correct that it possessed the
requisite length and breadth, was black in its colour, and had two large
white knobs. Then came the fateful rehearsal. Spontini was evidently ill at
ease on his seat in the orchestra. First of all he wished to have the oboists
placed behind him. As this partial change of position just at that moment
would have caused much confusion in the disposition of the orchestra, I
promised to effect the alteration after the rehearsal. He said no more, and
took up his baton. In a moment I understood why he attached such
importance to its form and size. He held it, not as other conductors do, by
the end, but gripped it about the middle with his clenched fist, waving it so
as to make it evident that he wielded his baton like a field-marshal’s staff,
not for beating time, but for command.
Confusion arose in the very first scene, which was increased by the fact
that the master’s instructions, both to orchestra and singers, were rendered
almost unintelligible by his confused use of the German language. This
much at least we were soon able to grasp, that he was particularly anxious
to disabuse us of the idea that this was a full-dress rehearsal, and to show us
that he was set upon a thorough re-study of the opera from the very
beginning. Great, indeed, was the despair of my good old chorus-master
and stage manager, Fischer—who before had enthusiastically advocated the
invitation of Spontini—when he recognised that the dislocation of our
repertoire was now inevitable. This feeling swelled by degrees to open
anger, in the blindness of which every fresh suggestion of Spontini’s
possible to procure him by to-morrow a baton of black ebony, whose very
respectable length and thickness he indicated by a gesture, and on each end
of which a fairly large knob of ivory was to be affixed. I promised to have
one prepared for the next rehearsal, which should at least be similar in
appearance to what he desired, and another of the specified materials in
time for the actual performance. Visibly relieved, he then passed his hand
over his brow, and granted me permission to announce his consent to
conduct on the following day. After once more strongly enforcing his
instructions as to the baton, he went back to his hotel.
I seemed to be moving in a dream, and hastened in a whirl-wind of
excitement to publish the news of what had happened and was to be
expected. We were fairly trapped. Schroder-Devrient offered to become our
scapegoat, while I entered into precise details with the theatre carpenter
concerning the baton. This turned out so far correct that it possessed the
requisite length and breadth, was black in its colour, and had two large
white knobs. Then came the fateful rehearsal. Spontini was evidently ill at
ease on his seat in the orchestra. First of all he wished to have the oboists
placed behind him. As this partial change of position just at that moment
would have caused much confusion in the disposition of the orchestra, I
promised to effect the alteration after the rehearsal. He said no more, and
took up his baton. In a moment I understood why he attached such
importance to its form and size. He held it, not as other conductors do, by
the end, but gripped it about the middle with his clenched fist, waving it so
as to make it evident that he wielded his baton like a field-marshal’s staff,
not for beating time, but for command.
Confusion arose in the very first scene, which was increased by the fact
that the master’s instructions, both to orchestra and singers, were rendered
almost unintelligible by his confused use of the German language. This
much at least we were soon able to grasp, that he was particularly anxious
to disabuse us of the idea that this was a full-dress rehearsal, and to show us
that he was set upon a thorough re-study of the opera from the very
beginning. Great, indeed, was the despair of my good old chorus-master
and stage manager, Fischer—who before had enthusiastically advocated the
invitation of Spontini—when he recognised that the dislocation of our
repertoire was now inevitable. This feeling swelled by degrees to open
anger, in the blindness of which every fresh suggestion of Spontini’s
Page 312
appeared but frivolous fault-finding, to which he bluntly responded in the
coarsest German. After one of the choruses Spontini beckoned me to his
side and whispered: ‘Mais savez-vous, vos choeurs ne chantent pas mal’;
whereupon Fischer, regarding this with suspicion, shouted out to me in a
rage: ‘What does the old hog want now?’ and I had some trouble to pacify
the speedily converted enthusiast.
But our most serious delay arose, during the first act, through the
evolutions of a triumphal march. With the most vociferous emphasis the
master expressed intense dissatisfaction with the apathetic demeanour of
our populace during the procession of vestal virgins. He was quite unaware
of the fact that, in obedience to our stage manager’s instructions, they had
fallen on their knees upon the appearance of the priestesses; for he was so
excited, and withal so terribly short-sighted, that nothing which appealed to
the eye alone was perceptible to his senses. What he demanded was that the
Roman army should manifest its devout respect in more drastic fashion by
flinging themselves as one man to the ground, and marking this by
delivering a crashing blow of their spears on their shields. Endless attempts
were made, but some one always clattered either too soon or too late. Then
he repeated the action himself several times with his baton on the desk, but
all to no purpose; the crash was not sufficiently sharp and emphatic. This
reminded me of the impression made upon me some years before in Berlin
by the wonderful precision and almost alarming effect with which I had
seen similar evolutions carried out in the play of Ferdinand Cortez, and I
realized that it would require an immediate and tedious accentuation of our
customary softness of action in such maneouvres before we could meet the
fastidious master’s requirements. At the end of the first act Spontini went on
the stage himself, in order to give a detailed explanation of his reasons for
wishing to defer his opera for a considerable time, so as to prepare by
multitudinous rehearsals for its production in accordance with his taste. He
expected to find the actors of the Dresden Court Theatre gathered there to
hear him; but the company had already dispersed. Singers and stage
manager had hastily scattered in every direction to give vent, each in his
own fashion, to the misery of the situation. None but the workmen, lamp-
cleaners, and a few of the chorus gathered in a semicircle around Spontini,
in order to have a look at that remarkable man, as he held forth with
wonderful effect on the requirements of true theatrical art. Turning towards
the dismal scene, I gently and respectfully pointed out to Spontini the
coarsest German. After one of the choruses Spontini beckoned me to his
side and whispered: ‘Mais savez-vous, vos choeurs ne chantent pas mal’;
whereupon Fischer, regarding this with suspicion, shouted out to me in a
rage: ‘What does the old hog want now?’ and I had some trouble to pacify
the speedily converted enthusiast.
But our most serious delay arose, during the first act, through the
evolutions of a triumphal march. With the most vociferous emphasis the
master expressed intense dissatisfaction with the apathetic demeanour of
our populace during the procession of vestal virgins. He was quite unaware
of the fact that, in obedience to our stage manager’s instructions, they had
fallen on their knees upon the appearance of the priestesses; for he was so
excited, and withal so terribly short-sighted, that nothing which appealed to
the eye alone was perceptible to his senses. What he demanded was that the
Roman army should manifest its devout respect in more drastic fashion by
flinging themselves as one man to the ground, and marking this by
delivering a crashing blow of their spears on their shields. Endless attempts
were made, but some one always clattered either too soon or too late. Then
he repeated the action himself several times with his baton on the desk, but
all to no purpose; the crash was not sufficiently sharp and emphatic. This
reminded me of the impression made upon me some years before in Berlin
by the wonderful precision and almost alarming effect with which I had
seen similar evolutions carried out in the play of Ferdinand Cortez, and I
realized that it would require an immediate and tedious accentuation of our
customary softness of action in such maneouvres before we could meet the
fastidious master’s requirements. At the end of the first act Spontini went on
the stage himself, in order to give a detailed explanation of his reasons for
wishing to defer his opera for a considerable time, so as to prepare by
multitudinous rehearsals for its production in accordance with his taste. He
expected to find the actors of the Dresden Court Theatre gathered there to
hear him; but the company had already dispersed. Singers and stage
manager had hastily scattered in every direction to give vent, each in his
own fashion, to the misery of the situation. None but the workmen, lamp-
cleaners, and a few of the chorus gathered in a semicircle around Spontini,
in order to have a look at that remarkable man, as he held forth with
wonderful effect on the requirements of true theatrical art. Turning towards
the dismal scene, I gently and respectfully pointed out to Spontini the
Page 313
uselessness of his declamation, and promised that everything should
eventually be done precisely as he desired.
Finally, I succeeded in extricating him from the undignified position in
which, to my horror, he had been placed, by telling him that Herr Eduard
Devrient, who had seen the Vestalin in Berlin, and carried every detail of
the performance in his mind, should personally drill our chorus and supers
into a becoming solemnity during the reception of the vestals. This pacified
him, and we proceeded to settle on a plan for a series of rehearsals
according to his wishes. But, in spite of all this, I was the only person to
whom this strange turn of affairs was not unwelcome; for through the
burlesque extravagances of Spontini, and notwithstanding his extraordinary
eccentricities, which, however, I learned in time to understand, I could
perceive the miraculous energy with which he pursued and attained an ideal
of theatrical art such as in our days had become almost unknown.
We began, therefore, with a pianoforte rehearsal, at which the master
made a point of telling the singers what he wanted. He did not tell us
anything new, however, for he said little about the details of the rendering;
on the other hand, he expatiated upon the general interpretation, and I
noticed that in doing this, he had accustomed himself to make the most
decided allowances for the great singers, especially Schroder-Devrient and
Tichatschek. The only thing he did was to forbid the latter to use the word
Braut (bride) with which Licinius had to address Julia in the German
translation; this word sounded horrible in his ears, and he could not
understand how anybody could set such a vulgar sound as that to music. He
gave a long lecture, however, to the somewhat coarse and less talented
singer who took the part of the high-priest, and explained to him how to
understand and interpret this character from the dialogue (in recitative)
between him and Haruspex. He told him that he must understand that the
whole thing was based upon priestcraft and superstition. Pontifex must
make it clear that he does not fear his antagonist at the head of the Roman
army, because, should the worst come to the worst, he has his machines
ready, which, if necessary, will miraculously rekindle the dead fire of Vesta.
In this way, even though Julia should escape the sacrifice, the power of the
priesthood would still be unassailable.
During one of the rehearsals I asked Spontini why he, who, as a rule,
made such very effective use of the trombone, should have left it entirely
eventually be done precisely as he desired.
Finally, I succeeded in extricating him from the undignified position in
which, to my horror, he had been placed, by telling him that Herr Eduard
Devrient, who had seen the Vestalin in Berlin, and carried every detail of
the performance in his mind, should personally drill our chorus and supers
into a becoming solemnity during the reception of the vestals. This pacified
him, and we proceeded to settle on a plan for a series of rehearsals
according to his wishes. But, in spite of all this, I was the only person to
whom this strange turn of affairs was not unwelcome; for through the
burlesque extravagances of Spontini, and notwithstanding his extraordinary
eccentricities, which, however, I learned in time to understand, I could
perceive the miraculous energy with which he pursued and attained an ideal
of theatrical art such as in our days had become almost unknown.
We began, therefore, with a pianoforte rehearsal, at which the master
made a point of telling the singers what he wanted. He did not tell us
anything new, however, for he said little about the details of the rendering;
on the other hand, he expatiated upon the general interpretation, and I
noticed that in doing this, he had accustomed himself to make the most
decided allowances for the great singers, especially Schroder-Devrient and
Tichatschek. The only thing he did was to forbid the latter to use the word
Braut (bride) with which Licinius had to address Julia in the German
translation; this word sounded horrible in his ears, and he could not
understand how anybody could set such a vulgar sound as that to music. He
gave a long lecture, however, to the somewhat coarse and less talented
singer who took the part of the high-priest, and explained to him how to
understand and interpret this character from the dialogue (in recitative)
between him and Haruspex. He told him that he must understand that the
whole thing was based upon priestcraft and superstition. Pontifex must
make it clear that he does not fear his antagonist at the head of the Roman
army, because, should the worst come to the worst, he has his machines
ready, which, if necessary, will miraculously rekindle the dead fire of Vesta.
In this way, even though Julia should escape the sacrifice, the power of the
priesthood would still be unassailable.
During one of the rehearsals I asked Spontini why he, who, as a rule,
made such very effective use of the trombone, should have left it entirely
Page 314
out in the magnificent triumphal march of the first act. Very much
astonished he asked: ‘Est-ce que je n’ai pas de trombones?’ I showed him
the printed score, and he then asked me to add the trombones to the march,
so that, if possible, they might be used at the next rehearsal. He also said:
‘J’ai entendu dans votre Rienzi un instrument, que vous appelez Basse-tuba;
je ne veux pas bannir cet instrument de l’orchestre: faites m’en une partie
pour la Vestale.’ It gave me great pleasure to perform this task for him with
all the care and good judgment I could dispose of. When at the rehearsal he
heard the effect for the first time, he threw me a really grateful glance, and
so much appreciated the really simple additions I had made to his score,
that a little later on he wrote me a very friendly letter from Paris in which
he asked me kindly to send him the extra instrumental parts I had prepared
for him. His pride would not allow him, however, to ask outright for
something for which I alone had been responsible, so he wrote: ‘Envoyez-
moi une partition des trombones pour la marche triomphale et de la Basse-
tuba telle qu’elle a ete executee sous ma direction a Dresde.’ Apart from
this, I also showed how greatly I respected him, in the eagerness with
which, at his special request, I regrouped all the instruments in the
orchestra. He was forced to this request more by habit than by principle,
and how very important it seemed to him not to make the slightest change
in his customary arrangements, was proved to me when he explained his
method of conducting. He conducted the orchestra, so he said, only with his
eyes: ‘My left eye is the first violin, my right eye the second, and if the eye
is to have power, one must not wear glasses (as so many bad conductors
do), even if one is short-sighted. I,’ he admitted confidentially, ‘cannot see
twelve inches in front of me, but all the same I can make them play as I
want, merely by fixing them with my eye.’ In some respects the arbitrary
way in which he used to arrange his orchestra was really very irrational.
From his old days in Paris he had retained the habit of placing the two
oboists immediately behind him, and although this was a fad which owed
its origin to a mere accident, it was one to which he always adhered. The
consequence was that these players had to avert the mouthpiece of their
instruments from the audience, and our excellent oboist was so angry about
this arrangement, that it was only by dint of great diplomacy that I
succeeded in pacifying him.
Apart from this, Spontini’s method was based upon the absolutely correct
system (which even at the present time is misunderstood by some German
astonished he asked: ‘Est-ce que je n’ai pas de trombones?’ I showed him
the printed score, and he then asked me to add the trombones to the march,
so that, if possible, they might be used at the next rehearsal. He also said:
‘J’ai entendu dans votre Rienzi un instrument, que vous appelez Basse-tuba;
je ne veux pas bannir cet instrument de l’orchestre: faites m’en une partie
pour la Vestale.’ It gave me great pleasure to perform this task for him with
all the care and good judgment I could dispose of. When at the rehearsal he
heard the effect for the first time, he threw me a really grateful glance, and
so much appreciated the really simple additions I had made to his score,
that a little later on he wrote me a very friendly letter from Paris in which
he asked me kindly to send him the extra instrumental parts I had prepared
for him. His pride would not allow him, however, to ask outright for
something for which I alone had been responsible, so he wrote: ‘Envoyez-
moi une partition des trombones pour la marche triomphale et de la Basse-
tuba telle qu’elle a ete executee sous ma direction a Dresde.’ Apart from
this, I also showed how greatly I respected him, in the eagerness with
which, at his special request, I regrouped all the instruments in the
orchestra. He was forced to this request more by habit than by principle,
and how very important it seemed to him not to make the slightest change
in his customary arrangements, was proved to me when he explained his
method of conducting. He conducted the orchestra, so he said, only with his
eyes: ‘My left eye is the first violin, my right eye the second, and if the eye
is to have power, one must not wear glasses (as so many bad conductors
do), even if one is short-sighted. I,’ he admitted confidentially, ‘cannot see
twelve inches in front of me, but all the same I can make them play as I
want, merely by fixing them with my eye.’ In some respects the arbitrary
way in which he used to arrange his orchestra was really very irrational.
From his old days in Paris he had retained the habit of placing the two
oboists immediately behind him, and although this was a fad which owed
its origin to a mere accident, it was one to which he always adhered. The
consequence was that these players had to avert the mouthpiece of their
instruments from the audience, and our excellent oboist was so angry about
this arrangement, that it was only by dint of great diplomacy that I
succeeded in pacifying him.
Apart from this, Spontini’s method was based upon the absolutely correct
system (which even at the present time is misunderstood by some German
Page 315
orchestras) of spreading the string quartette over the whole orchestra. This
system further consisted in preventing the brass and percussion instruments
from culminating in one point (and drowning each other) by dividing them
on both sides, and by placing the more delicate wind instruments at a
judicious distance from each other, thus forming a chain between the
violins. Even some great and celebrated orchestras of the present day still
retain the custom of dividing the mass of instruments into two halves, the
string and the wind instruments, an arrangement that denotes roughness and
a lack of understanding of the sound of the orchestra, which ought to blend
harmoniously and be well balanced.
I was very glad to have the chance of introducing this excellent
improvement in Dresden, for now that Spontini himself had initiated it, it
was an easy matter to get the King’s command to let the alteration stand.
Nothing remained after Spontini’s departure but to modify and correct
certain eccentricities and arbitrary features in his arrangements; and from
that moment I attained a high level of success with my orchestra.
With all the peculiarities he showed at rehearsals, this exceptional man
fascinated both musicians and singers to such an extent that the production
attracted quite an unusual amount of attention. Very characteristic was the
energy with which he insisted on exceptionally sharp rhythmic accents;
through his association with the Berlin orchestra he had acquired the habit
of marking the note that he wished to be brought out with the word diese
(this), which at first was quite incomprehensible to me. The great singer
Tichatschek, who had a positive genius for rhythm, was highly pleased by
this; for he also had acquired the habit of compelling the chorus to great
precision in very important entries, and maintained that if one only
accentuated the first note properly, the rest followed as a matter of course.
On the whole, therefore, a spirit of devotion to the master gradually
pervaded the orchestra; the violas alone bore him a grudge for a while, and
for this reason. In the accompaniment of the lugubrious cantilena of Julia at
the end of the second act, he would not put up with the way in which the
violas played the horribly sentimental accompaniment. Suddenly turning
towards them he called in a sepulchral tone, ‘Are the violas dying?’ The two
pale and incurably melancholy old men who held on tenaciously to their
posts in the orchestra, notwithstanding their right to a pension, stared at
Spontini with real fright, reading a threat in his words, and I had to explain
Spontini’s wish in sober language in order to call them back to life.
system further consisted in preventing the brass and percussion instruments
from culminating in one point (and drowning each other) by dividing them
on both sides, and by placing the more delicate wind instruments at a
judicious distance from each other, thus forming a chain between the
violins. Even some great and celebrated orchestras of the present day still
retain the custom of dividing the mass of instruments into two halves, the
string and the wind instruments, an arrangement that denotes roughness and
a lack of understanding of the sound of the orchestra, which ought to blend
harmoniously and be well balanced.
I was very glad to have the chance of introducing this excellent
improvement in Dresden, for now that Spontini himself had initiated it, it
was an easy matter to get the King’s command to let the alteration stand.
Nothing remained after Spontini’s departure but to modify and correct
certain eccentricities and arbitrary features in his arrangements; and from
that moment I attained a high level of success with my orchestra.
With all the peculiarities he showed at rehearsals, this exceptional man
fascinated both musicians and singers to such an extent that the production
attracted quite an unusual amount of attention. Very characteristic was the
energy with which he insisted on exceptionally sharp rhythmic accents;
through his association with the Berlin orchestra he had acquired the habit
of marking the note that he wished to be brought out with the word diese
(this), which at first was quite incomprehensible to me. The great singer
Tichatschek, who had a positive genius for rhythm, was highly pleased by
this; for he also had acquired the habit of compelling the chorus to great
precision in very important entries, and maintained that if one only
accentuated the first note properly, the rest followed as a matter of course.
On the whole, therefore, a spirit of devotion to the master gradually
pervaded the orchestra; the violas alone bore him a grudge for a while, and
for this reason. In the accompaniment of the lugubrious cantilena of Julia at
the end of the second act, he would not put up with the way in which the
violas played the horribly sentimental accompaniment. Suddenly turning
towards them he called in a sepulchral tone, ‘Are the violas dying?’ The two
pale and incurably melancholy old men who held on tenaciously to their
posts in the orchestra, notwithstanding their right to a pension, stared at
Spontini with real fright, reading a threat in his words, and I had to explain
Spontini’s wish in sober language in order to call them back to life.
Page 316
On the stage Herr Eduard Devrient helped very materially in bringing
about wonderfully distinct ensembles; he also knew how to gratify a certain
wish of Spontini’s, which threw us all into tremendous confusion. In
accordance with the cuts adopted by all the German theatres, we too ended
the opera with the fiery duet, supported by the chorus, between Licinius and
Julia after their rescue. The master, however, insisted on adding a lively
chorus and ballet to the finale, according to the antiquated method of ending
common to French opera seria. He was absolutely against finishing his
work with a dismal churchyard episode; consequently the whole scene had
to be altered. Venus was to shine resplendent in a rose bower, and the long-
suffering lovers were to be wedded at her altar, amid lively dancing and
singing, by rose-bedecked priests and priestesses. We performed it like this,
but unluckily not with the success we had all hoped for.
In the course of the production, which was proceeding with wonderful
accuracy and verve, we came across a difficulty with regard to the principal
part for which none of us had been prepared. Our great Schroder-Devrient
was obviously no longer of an age to give the desired effect as the youngest
of the vestal virgins; she had acquired matronly contours, and her age was
moreover accentuated by the extremely girlish-looking high-priestess with
whom she had to act, and whose youth it was difficult to dissimulate. This
was my niece, Johanna Wagner, who, because of her marvellous voice and
great talent as an actress, made every one in the audience long to see the
parts of the two women reversed. Schroder-Devrient, who was well aware
of this fact, tried by every effective means in her power to overcome her
most difficult position; this effort, however, resulted not infrequently in
great exaggeration and straining of the voice, and in one very important
place her part was sadly overacted. When, after the great trio in the second
act, she had to gasp the words, ‘er ist frei’ (‘he is free’), and to move away
from her rescued lover towards the front of the stage, she made the mistake
of speaking the words instead of singing them.
She had often proved the effect of a decisive word uttered with an
exaggerated and yet careful imitation of the ordinary accents of the spoken
language, by exciting the audience’s wildest enthusiasm when she almost
whispered the words, ‘Noch einen Schritt und du bist todt!’ (‘Just one more
step and thou art dead!’) in Fidelia. This terrific effect, which I too had felt,
was produced by the shock—like unto the blow of an executioner’s axe—
which I received on suddenly coming down from the ideal sphere to which
about wonderfully distinct ensembles; he also knew how to gratify a certain
wish of Spontini’s, which threw us all into tremendous confusion. In
accordance with the cuts adopted by all the German theatres, we too ended
the opera with the fiery duet, supported by the chorus, between Licinius and
Julia after their rescue. The master, however, insisted on adding a lively
chorus and ballet to the finale, according to the antiquated method of ending
common to French opera seria. He was absolutely against finishing his
work with a dismal churchyard episode; consequently the whole scene had
to be altered. Venus was to shine resplendent in a rose bower, and the long-
suffering lovers were to be wedded at her altar, amid lively dancing and
singing, by rose-bedecked priests and priestesses. We performed it like this,
but unluckily not with the success we had all hoped for.
In the course of the production, which was proceeding with wonderful
accuracy and verve, we came across a difficulty with regard to the principal
part for which none of us had been prepared. Our great Schroder-Devrient
was obviously no longer of an age to give the desired effect as the youngest
of the vestal virgins; she had acquired matronly contours, and her age was
moreover accentuated by the extremely girlish-looking high-priestess with
whom she had to act, and whose youth it was difficult to dissimulate. This
was my niece, Johanna Wagner, who, because of her marvellous voice and
great talent as an actress, made every one in the audience long to see the
parts of the two women reversed. Schroder-Devrient, who was well aware
of this fact, tried by every effective means in her power to overcome her
most difficult position; this effort, however, resulted not infrequently in
great exaggeration and straining of the voice, and in one very important
place her part was sadly overacted. When, after the great trio in the second
act, she had to gasp the words, ‘er ist frei’ (‘he is free’), and to move away
from her rescued lover towards the front of the stage, she made the mistake
of speaking the words instead of singing them.
She had often proved the effect of a decisive word uttered with an
exaggerated and yet careful imitation of the ordinary accents of the spoken
language, by exciting the audience’s wildest enthusiasm when she almost
whispered the words, ‘Noch einen Schritt und du bist todt!’ (‘Just one more
step and thou art dead!’) in Fidelia. This terrific effect, which I too had felt,
was produced by the shock—like unto the blow of an executioner’s axe—
which I received on suddenly coming down from the ideal sphere to which
Page 317
music itself can exalt the most awful situations, to the naked surface of
dreadful reality. This sensation was due simply to the knowledge of the
utmost height of the sublime, and the memory of the impression I received
led me to call that particular moment the moment of lightning; for it was as
if two different worlds that meet, and yet are divided, were suddenly
illumined and revealed as by a flash. Thoroughly to understand such a
moment, and not to treat it wrongly, was the whole secret, and this I fully
realised on that day from the absolute failure on the great singer’s part to
produce the right effect. The toneless, hoarse way in which she uttered the
words was like throwing cold water over the audience and myself, and not
one of those present could see any more in the incident than a botched
theatrical effect. It is possible that the public had expected too much, for
they were curious to see Spontini conduct, and the prices had been raised
accordingly; it may also have been that the whole style of the work, with its
antiquated French plot, seemed rather obsolete in spite of the majestic
beauty, of the music; or, perhaps, the very tame end left the same cold
impression as Devrient’s dramatic failure. In any case there was no real
enthusiasm, and the only sign of approval was a rather lukewarm call for
the celebrated master, who, covered with numerous decorations, made a sad
impression on me as he bowed his thanks to the audience for their very
moderate applause.
Nobody was less blind to the somewhat disappointing result than
Spontini himself. He decided, however, to defy fate, and to this end had
recourse to means which he had often employed in Berlin, in order to get
packed houses for his operatic productions. Thus, he always gave Sunday
performances, for experience had taught him that he could always have a
full house on that day. As the next Sunday on which his Vestalin was to be
produced was still some time ahead, his prolonged stay gave us several
more chances of enjoying his interesting company. I have such a vivid
recollection of the hours spent with him either at Madame Devrient’s or at
my house, that I shall be pleased to quote a few reminiscences.
I shall never forget a dinner at Schroder-Devrient’s house at which we
had a charming conversation with Spontini and his wife (a sister of the
celebrated pianoforte maker, Erard). Spontini generally listened
deferentially to what the others had to say, his attitude being that of a man
who expected to be asked for his opinion. When he did speak in the end it
was with a sort of rhetorical solemnity, in sharp and precise sentences,
dreadful reality. This sensation was due simply to the knowledge of the
utmost height of the sublime, and the memory of the impression I received
led me to call that particular moment the moment of lightning; for it was as
if two different worlds that meet, and yet are divided, were suddenly
illumined and revealed as by a flash. Thoroughly to understand such a
moment, and not to treat it wrongly, was the whole secret, and this I fully
realised on that day from the absolute failure on the great singer’s part to
produce the right effect. The toneless, hoarse way in which she uttered the
words was like throwing cold water over the audience and myself, and not
one of those present could see any more in the incident than a botched
theatrical effect. It is possible that the public had expected too much, for
they were curious to see Spontini conduct, and the prices had been raised
accordingly; it may also have been that the whole style of the work, with its
antiquated French plot, seemed rather obsolete in spite of the majestic
beauty, of the music; or, perhaps, the very tame end left the same cold
impression as Devrient’s dramatic failure. In any case there was no real
enthusiasm, and the only sign of approval was a rather lukewarm call for
the celebrated master, who, covered with numerous decorations, made a sad
impression on me as he bowed his thanks to the audience for their very
moderate applause.
Nobody was less blind to the somewhat disappointing result than
Spontini himself. He decided, however, to defy fate, and to this end had
recourse to means which he had often employed in Berlin, in order to get
packed houses for his operatic productions. Thus, he always gave Sunday
performances, for experience had taught him that he could always have a
full house on that day. As the next Sunday on which his Vestalin was to be
produced was still some time ahead, his prolonged stay gave us several
more chances of enjoying his interesting company. I have such a vivid
recollection of the hours spent with him either at Madame Devrient’s or at
my house, that I shall be pleased to quote a few reminiscences.
I shall never forget a dinner at Schroder-Devrient’s house at which we
had a charming conversation with Spontini and his wife (a sister of the
celebrated pianoforte maker, Erard). Spontini generally listened
deferentially to what the others had to say, his attitude being that of a man
who expected to be asked for his opinion. When he did speak in the end it
was with a sort of rhetorical solemnity, in sharp and precise sentences,
Page 318
categorical and well accentuated, which forbade contradiction from the
outset. Herr Ferdinand Hiller was among the invited guests, and he began to
speak about Liszt. After some time Spontini gave his opinion in his
characteristic fashion, but in a spirit which showed only too clearly, that
from the heights of his Berlin throne he had not judged the affairs of the
world either with impartiality or goodwill. While he was laying down the
law in this style he could not brook any interruption. When, therefore,
during the dessert, the general conversation became livelier, and Madame
Devrient happened to laugh with her neighbour at the table in the middle of
a long harangue of Spontini’s, he shot an extremely angry glance at his
wife. Madame Devrient apologised for her at once by saying that it was she
(Madame Devrient) who had been laughing about some lines on a
bonbonnière, whereupon Spontini retorted: ‘Pourtant je suis sûr que c’est
ma femme qui a suscité ce rire; je ne veux pas que l’on rie devant moi, je ne
rie jamais moi, j’aime le sérieux.’ In spite of that he sometimes succeeded
in being jovial. For instance, it amused him to set us all wondering at the
way in which he crunched enormous lumps of sugar with his marvellous
teeth. After dinner, when we drew our chairs closer together, he usually
became very excited.
As far as he was capable of affection he seemed really to like me; he
declared openly that he loved me, and said that he would prove this best by
trying to keep me from the misfortune of proceeding in my career as a
dramatic composer. He said he knew it would be difficult to convince me of
the value of this friendly service, but as he felt it his sacred duty to look
after my happiness in this particular line, he was prepared to stay in
Dresden for another half-year, during which period he suggested that we
should produce his other operas, and especially Agnes von Hohenstaufen,
under his direction. To explain his views about the fatal mistake of trying to
succeed as a dramatic composer ‘after Spontini,’ he began by praising me in
these terms: ‘Quand j’ai entendu votre Rienzi, j’ai dit, c’est un homme de
génie, mais déjà il a plus fait qu’il ne peut faire.’ In order to show me what
he meant by this paradox, he proceeded as follows: ‘Après Gluck c’est moi
qui ai fait la grande révolution avec la Vestale; j’ai introduit le Vorhalt de
la sexte’ (the suspension of the sixth) ‘dans l’harmonie et la grosse caisse
dans l’orchestre; avec Cortez j’ai fait un pas de plus en avant; puis j’ai fait
trois pas avec Olympic. Nurmahal, Alcidor et tout ce que j’ai fait dans les
premiers temps à Berlin, je vous les livre, c’étaient des œuvres
outset. Herr Ferdinand Hiller was among the invited guests, and he began to
speak about Liszt. After some time Spontini gave his opinion in his
characteristic fashion, but in a spirit which showed only too clearly, that
from the heights of his Berlin throne he had not judged the affairs of the
world either with impartiality or goodwill. While he was laying down the
law in this style he could not brook any interruption. When, therefore,
during the dessert, the general conversation became livelier, and Madame
Devrient happened to laugh with her neighbour at the table in the middle of
a long harangue of Spontini’s, he shot an extremely angry glance at his
wife. Madame Devrient apologised for her at once by saying that it was she
(Madame Devrient) who had been laughing about some lines on a
bonbonnière, whereupon Spontini retorted: ‘Pourtant je suis sûr que c’est
ma femme qui a suscité ce rire; je ne veux pas que l’on rie devant moi, je ne
rie jamais moi, j’aime le sérieux.’ In spite of that he sometimes succeeded
in being jovial. For instance, it amused him to set us all wondering at the
way in which he crunched enormous lumps of sugar with his marvellous
teeth. After dinner, when we drew our chairs closer together, he usually
became very excited.
As far as he was capable of affection he seemed really to like me; he
declared openly that he loved me, and said that he would prove this best by
trying to keep me from the misfortune of proceeding in my career as a
dramatic composer. He said he knew it would be difficult to convince me of
the value of this friendly service, but as he felt it his sacred duty to look
after my happiness in this particular line, he was prepared to stay in
Dresden for another half-year, during which period he suggested that we
should produce his other operas, and especially Agnes von Hohenstaufen,
under his direction. To explain his views about the fatal mistake of trying to
succeed as a dramatic composer ‘after Spontini,’ he began by praising me in
these terms: ‘Quand j’ai entendu votre Rienzi, j’ai dit, c’est un homme de
génie, mais déjà il a plus fait qu’il ne peut faire.’ In order to show me what
he meant by this paradox, he proceeded as follows: ‘Après Gluck c’est moi
qui ai fait la grande révolution avec la Vestale; j’ai introduit le Vorhalt de
la sexte’ (the suspension of the sixth) ‘dans l’harmonie et la grosse caisse
dans l’orchestre; avec Cortez j’ai fait un pas de plus en avant; puis j’ai fait
trois pas avec Olympic. Nurmahal, Alcidor et tout ce que j’ai fait dans les
premiers temps à Berlin, je vous les livre, c’étaient des œuvres
Page 319
occasionnelles; mais depuis j’ai fait cent pas en avant avec Agnès de
Hohenstaufen, où j’ai imaginé un emploi de l’orchestre remplacant
parfaitement l’orgue.’
Since then he had tried his hand at a new work, Les Atheniennes; the
Crown Prince (now King of Prussia[13]) had urged him to finish this work,
and to testify to the truth of his words, he took several letters which he had
received from this monarch out of his pocket-book, and handed them to us
for inspection. Not until he had insisted upon our reading them carefully
through did he continue by saying that, in spite of this flattering invitation,
he had given up the idea of setting this excellent subject to music, because
he felt sure he could never surpass his Agnes von Hohenstaufen, nor invent
anything new. In conclusion he said: ‘Or, comment voulez-vous que
quiconque puisse inventer quelque chose de nouveau, moi Spontini
declarant ne pouvoir en aucune facon surpasser mes œuvres precedentes,
d’autre part etant avise que depuis la Vestale il n’a point ete ecrit une note
qui ne fut volee de mes partitions.’
[13] William the First.
To prove that this assertion was not merely talk, but that it was based on
scientific investigations, he quoted his wife, who was supposed to have read
with him an elaborate discussion on the subject by a celebrated member of
the French academy, and he added that the essay in question had, for some
mysterious reason, never been printed. In this very important and scientific
treatise it was proved that without Spontini’s invention of the suspension of
the sixth in his Vestalin, the whole of modern melody would not have
existed, and that any and every form of melody that had been used since
had been borrowed from his compositions. I was thunderstruck, but hoped
all the same to bring the inexorable master to a better frame of mind,
especially in regard to certain reservations he had made. I acknowledged
that the academician in question was right in many ways, but I asked him if
he did not believe that if somebody brought him a dramatic poem full of an
absolutely new and hitherto unknown spirit, it would not inspire him to
invent new musical combinations? With a ring of compassion in his voice,
he replied that my question was wholly mistaken; in what would the
novelty consist? ‘Dans la Vestale j’ai compose un sujet romain, dans
Ferdinand Cortez un sujet espagnol-mexicain, dans Olympic un sujet greco-
macedonien, enfin dans Agnes de Hohenstaufen un sujet allemand: tout le
Hohenstaufen, où j’ai imaginé un emploi de l’orchestre remplacant
parfaitement l’orgue.’
Since then he had tried his hand at a new work, Les Atheniennes; the
Crown Prince (now King of Prussia[13]) had urged him to finish this work,
and to testify to the truth of his words, he took several letters which he had
received from this monarch out of his pocket-book, and handed them to us
for inspection. Not until he had insisted upon our reading them carefully
through did he continue by saying that, in spite of this flattering invitation,
he had given up the idea of setting this excellent subject to music, because
he felt sure he could never surpass his Agnes von Hohenstaufen, nor invent
anything new. In conclusion he said: ‘Or, comment voulez-vous que
quiconque puisse inventer quelque chose de nouveau, moi Spontini
declarant ne pouvoir en aucune facon surpasser mes œuvres precedentes,
d’autre part etant avise que depuis la Vestale il n’a point ete ecrit une note
qui ne fut volee de mes partitions.’
[13] William the First.
To prove that this assertion was not merely talk, but that it was based on
scientific investigations, he quoted his wife, who was supposed to have read
with him an elaborate discussion on the subject by a celebrated member of
the French academy, and he added that the essay in question had, for some
mysterious reason, never been printed. In this very important and scientific
treatise it was proved that without Spontini’s invention of the suspension of
the sixth in his Vestalin, the whole of modern melody would not have
existed, and that any and every form of melody that had been used since
had been borrowed from his compositions. I was thunderstruck, but hoped
all the same to bring the inexorable master to a better frame of mind,
especially in regard to certain reservations he had made. I acknowledged
that the academician in question was right in many ways, but I asked him if
he did not believe that if somebody brought him a dramatic poem full of an
absolutely new and hitherto unknown spirit, it would not inspire him to
invent new musical combinations? With a ring of compassion in his voice,
he replied that my question was wholly mistaken; in what would the
novelty consist? ‘Dans la Vestale j’ai compose un sujet romain, dans
Ferdinand Cortez un sujet espagnol-mexicain, dans Olympic un sujet greco-
macedonien, enfin dans Agnes de Hohenstaufen un sujet allemand: tout le
Page 320
reste ne vaut rien!’ He hoped that I was not thinking of the so-called
romantic style a la Freischutz? With such childish stuff no serious man
could have anything to do; for art was a serious thing, and he had exhausted
serious art! And, after all, what nation could produce the composer who
could surpass HIM? Surely not the Italians, whom he characterised simply
as cochons; certainly not the French, who had only imitated the Italians; nor
the Germans, who would never get beyond their childhood in music, and
who, if they had ever possessed any talent, had had it all spoilt for them by
the Jews? ‘Oh, croyez-moi, il y avait de l’espoir pour l’Allemagne lorsque
j’etais empereur de la musique a Berlin; mais depuis que le roi de Prusse a
livre sa musique au desordre occasionne par les deux juifs errants qu’il a
attires, tout espoir est perdu.’
Our charming hostess now thought it time to change the subject, and to
divert the master’s thoughts. The theatre was situated quite near to her
house; she invited him to go across with our friend Heine, who was
amongst the guests, and to have a look at Antigone, which was then being
given, and which was sure to interest him on account of the antique
equipment of the stage, which had been carried out according to Semper’s
excellent plans. At first he wanted to refuse, on the plea that he had seen all
this so much better when his Olympia had been performed. After a while he
consented; but in a very short time he returned to his original opinion, and,
smiling scornfully, assured us that he had seen and heard enough to
strengthen him in his verdict. Heine told us that shortly after he and
Spontini had taken their seats in the almost empty amphitheatre, and as
soon as the Bacchus chorus had started, Spontini had said to him: ‘C’est de
la Berliner Sing-Academie, allons-nous-en.’ Through an open door a streak
of light had fallen on a lonely figure behind one of the columns; Heine had
recognised Mendelssohn, and concluded that he had overheard Spontini’s
remark.
From the master’s very excited conversations we soon realised very
distinctly that he intended to stay longer in Dresden, so as to get all his
operas performed. It was Schroder-Devrient’s idea to save Spontini, in his
own interest, from the mortifying disappointment of finding all his
enthusiastic hopes in regard to a second performance of Vestalin unfounded,
and, if possible, to prevent this second performance during his stay in
Dresden. She pretended to be ill, and the director requested me to inform
Spontini of the fact that his production would have to be indefinitely
romantic style a la Freischutz? With such childish stuff no serious man
could have anything to do; for art was a serious thing, and he had exhausted
serious art! And, after all, what nation could produce the composer who
could surpass HIM? Surely not the Italians, whom he characterised simply
as cochons; certainly not the French, who had only imitated the Italians; nor
the Germans, who would never get beyond their childhood in music, and
who, if they had ever possessed any talent, had had it all spoilt for them by
the Jews? ‘Oh, croyez-moi, il y avait de l’espoir pour l’Allemagne lorsque
j’etais empereur de la musique a Berlin; mais depuis que le roi de Prusse a
livre sa musique au desordre occasionne par les deux juifs errants qu’il a
attires, tout espoir est perdu.’
Our charming hostess now thought it time to change the subject, and to
divert the master’s thoughts. The theatre was situated quite near to her
house; she invited him to go across with our friend Heine, who was
amongst the guests, and to have a look at Antigone, which was then being
given, and which was sure to interest him on account of the antique
equipment of the stage, which had been carried out according to Semper’s
excellent plans. At first he wanted to refuse, on the plea that he had seen all
this so much better when his Olympia had been performed. After a while he
consented; but in a very short time he returned to his original opinion, and,
smiling scornfully, assured us that he had seen and heard enough to
strengthen him in his verdict. Heine told us that shortly after he and
Spontini had taken their seats in the almost empty amphitheatre, and as
soon as the Bacchus chorus had started, Spontini had said to him: ‘C’est de
la Berliner Sing-Academie, allons-nous-en.’ Through an open door a streak
of light had fallen on a lonely figure behind one of the columns; Heine had
recognised Mendelssohn, and concluded that he had overheard Spontini’s
remark.
From the master’s very excited conversations we soon realised very
distinctly that he intended to stay longer in Dresden, so as to get all his
operas performed. It was Schroder-Devrient’s idea to save Spontini, in his
own interest, from the mortifying disappointment of finding all his
enthusiastic hopes in regard to a second performance of Vestalin unfounded,
and, if possible, to prevent this second performance during his stay in
Dresden. She pretended to be ill, and the director requested me to inform
Spontini of the fact that his production would have to be indefinitely
Page 321
postponed. This visit was so distasteful to me, that I was glad to make it in
Röckel’s company. He was also a friend of Spontini’s, and his French was
moreover much better than mine. As we were quite prepared for a bad
reception, we were really frightened to enter. Imagine, therefore, our
astonishment when we found the master, who had already been informed of
the news in a letter from Devrient, in the very brightest spirits.
He told us that he had to leave immediately for Paris, and that from there
he was to travel to Rome, the Holy Father having commanded him to come
in order to receive the title of ‘Count of San Andrea.’ Then he showed us a
second document, in which the King of Denmark was supposed to have
raised him to the Danish nobility. This meant, however, only that the title of
‘Ritter’ of the ‘Elephanten-Order’ had been conferred upon him; and
although this was indeed a high honour, in speaking about it he only
mentioned the word ‘Ritter’ without referring to the particular order,
because this seemed to him too ordinary for a person of his dignity. He was,
however, childishly pleased over the affair, and felt that he had been
miraculously rescued from the narrow sphere of his Dresden Vestalin
production to find himself suddenly transported into regions of glory, from
which he looked down upon the distressing ‘opera’ world with sublime self-
content.
Meanwhile Röckel and I silently thanked the Holy Father and the King of
Denmark from the bottom of our hearts. We bode an affectionate farewell to
the strange master, and to cheer him I promised him seriously to think over
his friendly advice with regard to my career as a composer of opera.
Later on I heard what Spontini had said about me, on hearing that I had
fled from Dresden for political reasons, and had sought refuge in
Switzerland. He thought that this was in consequence of my share in a plot
of high treason against the King of Saxony, whom he looked upon as my
benefactor, because I had been nominated conductor of the royal orchestra,
and he expressed his opinion about me by ejaculating in tones of the
deepest anguish: ‘Quelle ingratitude!’
From Berlioz, who was at Spontini’s deathbed until the end, I heard that
the master had struggled most determinedly against death, and had cried
repeatedly, ‘Je ne veux pas mourir, je ne veux pas mourir!’ When Berlioz
tried to comfort him by saying, ‘Comment pouvez-vous penser mourir
vous, mon maître, qui etes immortel!’ Spontini retorted angrily, ‘Ne faites
Röckel’s company. He was also a friend of Spontini’s, and his French was
moreover much better than mine. As we were quite prepared for a bad
reception, we were really frightened to enter. Imagine, therefore, our
astonishment when we found the master, who had already been informed of
the news in a letter from Devrient, in the very brightest spirits.
He told us that he had to leave immediately for Paris, and that from there
he was to travel to Rome, the Holy Father having commanded him to come
in order to receive the title of ‘Count of San Andrea.’ Then he showed us a
second document, in which the King of Denmark was supposed to have
raised him to the Danish nobility. This meant, however, only that the title of
‘Ritter’ of the ‘Elephanten-Order’ had been conferred upon him; and
although this was indeed a high honour, in speaking about it he only
mentioned the word ‘Ritter’ without referring to the particular order,
because this seemed to him too ordinary for a person of his dignity. He was,
however, childishly pleased over the affair, and felt that he had been
miraculously rescued from the narrow sphere of his Dresden Vestalin
production to find himself suddenly transported into regions of glory, from
which he looked down upon the distressing ‘opera’ world with sublime self-
content.
Meanwhile Röckel and I silently thanked the Holy Father and the King of
Denmark from the bottom of our hearts. We bode an affectionate farewell to
the strange master, and to cheer him I promised him seriously to think over
his friendly advice with regard to my career as a composer of opera.
Later on I heard what Spontini had said about me, on hearing that I had
fled from Dresden for political reasons, and had sought refuge in
Switzerland. He thought that this was in consequence of my share in a plot
of high treason against the King of Saxony, whom he looked upon as my
benefactor, because I had been nominated conductor of the royal orchestra,
and he expressed his opinion about me by ejaculating in tones of the
deepest anguish: ‘Quelle ingratitude!’
From Berlioz, who was at Spontini’s deathbed until the end, I heard that
the master had struggled most determinedly against death, and had cried
repeatedly, ‘Je ne veux pas mourir, je ne veux pas mourir!’ When Berlioz
tried to comfort him by saying, ‘Comment pouvez-vous penser mourir
vous, mon maître, qui etes immortel!’ Spontini retorted angrily, ‘Ne faites
Page 322
pas de mauvaises plaisanteries!’ In spite of all the extraordinary experiences
I had had with him, the news of his death, which I received in Zürich,
touched me very deeply. Later on I expressed my feelings towards him, and
my opinion of him as an artist, in a somewhat condensed form in the
Eidgenossischen Zeitung, and in this article the quality I extolled more
particularly in him was that, unlike Meyerbeer, who was then the rage, and
the very aged Rossini, he believed absolutely in himself and his art. All the
same, and somewhat to my disgust, I could not but see that this belief in
himself had deteriorated into a veritable superstition.
I do not remember in those days having gone deeply into my feelings
about Spontini’s exceedingly strange individuality, nor do I recollect having
troubled to discover how far they were consistent with the high opinion I
formed of him after I had got to know him more intimately. Obviously I had
only seen the caricature of the man, although the tendency towards such
plainly overweening self-confidence may, at all events, have manifested
itself earlier in life. At the same time, one could trace in all this the
influence of the decay of the musical and dramatic life of the period, which
Spontini, situated as he was in Berlin, was well able to witness. The
surprising fact that he saw his chief merit in unessential details showed
plainly that his judgment had become childish; in my opinion this did not
detract from the great value of his works, however much he might
exaggerate their value. In a sense I could justify his boundless self-
confidence, which was principally the outcome of the comparison between
himself and the great composers who were now replacing him; for in my
heart of hearts I shared the contempt which he felt for these artists, although
I did not dare to say so openly. And thus it came about that, in spite of his
many somewhat absurd idiosyncrasies, I learned during this meeting at
Dresden to feel a deep sympathy for this man, the like of whom I was never
again to meet.
My next experiences of important musical celebrities of this age were of
quite a different character. Amongst the more distinguished of these was
Heinrich Marschner, who, as a very young man, had been nominated
musical director of the Dresden orchestra by Weber. After Weber’s death he
seemed to have hoped that he would take his place entirely, and it was due
less to the fact that his talent was still unknown, than to his repellent
manner, that he was disappointed in his expectations. His wife, however,
suddenly came into some money, and this windfall enabled him to devote
I had had with him, the news of his death, which I received in Zürich,
touched me very deeply. Later on I expressed my feelings towards him, and
my opinion of him as an artist, in a somewhat condensed form in the
Eidgenossischen Zeitung, and in this article the quality I extolled more
particularly in him was that, unlike Meyerbeer, who was then the rage, and
the very aged Rossini, he believed absolutely in himself and his art. All the
same, and somewhat to my disgust, I could not but see that this belief in
himself had deteriorated into a veritable superstition.
I do not remember in those days having gone deeply into my feelings
about Spontini’s exceedingly strange individuality, nor do I recollect having
troubled to discover how far they were consistent with the high opinion I
formed of him after I had got to know him more intimately. Obviously I had
only seen the caricature of the man, although the tendency towards such
plainly overweening self-confidence may, at all events, have manifested
itself earlier in life. At the same time, one could trace in all this the
influence of the decay of the musical and dramatic life of the period, which
Spontini, situated as he was in Berlin, was well able to witness. The
surprising fact that he saw his chief merit in unessential details showed
plainly that his judgment had become childish; in my opinion this did not
detract from the great value of his works, however much he might
exaggerate their value. In a sense I could justify his boundless self-
confidence, which was principally the outcome of the comparison between
himself and the great composers who were now replacing him; for in my
heart of hearts I shared the contempt which he felt for these artists, although
I did not dare to say so openly. And thus it came about that, in spite of his
many somewhat absurd idiosyncrasies, I learned during this meeting at
Dresden to feel a deep sympathy for this man, the like of whom I was never
again to meet.
My next experiences of important musical celebrities of this age were of
quite a different character. Amongst the more distinguished of these was
Heinrich Marschner, who, as a very young man, had been nominated
musical director of the Dresden orchestra by Weber. After Weber’s death he
seemed to have hoped that he would take his place entirely, and it was due
less to the fact that his talent was still unknown, than to his repellent
manner, that he was disappointed in his expectations. His wife, however,
suddenly came into some money, and this windfall enabled him to devote
Page 323
all his energies to his work as composer of operas, without being obliged to
fill any fixed post.
During the wild days of my youth Marschner lived in Leipzig, where his
operas Der Vampir and Templer und Judin saw their first appearance. My
sister Rosalie had once taken me to him in order to hear his opinion about
me. He did not treat me uncivilly, but my visit led to nothing. I was also
present at the first night of his opera Des Falkner’s Braut, which however
was not a success. Then he went to Hanover. His opera Hans Heiling, which
was originally produced in Berlin, I heard for the first time in Wurzburg; it
showed vacillation in its tendency, and a decrease in constructive power.
After that he produced several other operas, such as Das Schloss am Aetna
and Der Babu, which never became popular. He was always neglected by
the management at Dresden, as though they bore him some grudge, and
only his Templer was played at all often. My colleague, Reissiger, had to
conduct this opera, and as in his absence I always had to take his place, it
also fell to my lot on one occasion to direct a performance of this work.
This was during the time that I worked at my Tannhäuser. I remember
that, although I had often conducted this opera before in Magdeburg, on this
occasion the wild nature of the instrumentation and its lack of mastership
affected me to such an extent that it literally made me ill, and as soon as he
returned, therefore, I implored Reissiger at any cost to resume the
leadership. On the other hand, immediately after my nomination I had
started on the production of Hans Heiling, but merely for the sake of the
artistic honour. The insufficient distribution of the parts, however, a
difficulty which in those days could not be overcome, made a complete
success impossible. In any case, though, the whole spirit of the work
seemed to be terribly old-fashioned.
I now heard that Marschner had finished another opera called Adolph von
Nassau, and in a criticism of this work, of the genuineness of which I was
unable to judge, particular stress was laid upon the ‘patriotic and noble
German atmosphere’ of this new creation. I did my best to make the
Dresden theatre take the initiative, and to urge Lüttichau to secure this
opera before it was produced elsewhere. Marschner, who did not seem to
have been treated with particular consideration by the Hanoverian opera
authorities, accepted the invitation with great joy, sent his score, and
declared himself willing to come to Dresden for the first performance.
fill any fixed post.
During the wild days of my youth Marschner lived in Leipzig, where his
operas Der Vampir and Templer und Judin saw their first appearance. My
sister Rosalie had once taken me to him in order to hear his opinion about
me. He did not treat me uncivilly, but my visit led to nothing. I was also
present at the first night of his opera Des Falkner’s Braut, which however
was not a success. Then he went to Hanover. His opera Hans Heiling, which
was originally produced in Berlin, I heard for the first time in Wurzburg; it
showed vacillation in its tendency, and a decrease in constructive power.
After that he produced several other operas, such as Das Schloss am Aetna
and Der Babu, which never became popular. He was always neglected by
the management at Dresden, as though they bore him some grudge, and
only his Templer was played at all often. My colleague, Reissiger, had to
conduct this opera, and as in his absence I always had to take his place, it
also fell to my lot on one occasion to direct a performance of this work.
This was during the time that I worked at my Tannhäuser. I remember
that, although I had often conducted this opera before in Magdeburg, on this
occasion the wild nature of the instrumentation and its lack of mastership
affected me to such an extent that it literally made me ill, and as soon as he
returned, therefore, I implored Reissiger at any cost to resume the
leadership. On the other hand, immediately after my nomination I had
started on the production of Hans Heiling, but merely for the sake of the
artistic honour. The insufficient distribution of the parts, however, a
difficulty which in those days could not be overcome, made a complete
success impossible. In any case, though, the whole spirit of the work
seemed to be terribly old-fashioned.
I now heard that Marschner had finished another opera called Adolph von
Nassau, and in a criticism of this work, of the genuineness of which I was
unable to judge, particular stress was laid upon the ‘patriotic and noble
German atmosphere’ of this new creation. I did my best to make the
Dresden theatre take the initiative, and to urge Lüttichau to secure this
opera before it was produced elsewhere. Marschner, who did not seem to
have been treated with particular consideration by the Hanoverian opera
authorities, accepted the invitation with great joy, sent his score, and
declared himself willing to come to Dresden for the first performance.
Page 324
Lüttichau, however, was not anxious to see him take his place at the head of
the orchestra; while I, also, was of the opinion that the too frequent
appearance of outside conductors, even if it were for the purpose of
conducting their own works, would not only lead to confusion, but might
also fail to be as amusing and instructive as Spontini’s visit had proved to
be. It was therefore decided that I should conduct the new opera myself.
And how I lived to regret it!
The score arrived: to a weak plot by Karl Golmick the composer of the
Templer had written such superficial music, that the principal effect lay in a
drinking song for a quartette, in which the German Rhine and German wine
played the usual stereotyped part peculiar to such male quartettes. I lost all
courage; but we had to go on with it now, and all I could do was to try, by
maintaining a grave bearing, to make the singers take an interest in their
task; this, however, was not easy. To Tichatschek and Mitterwurzer were
assigned the two principal male parts; being both eminently musical, they
sang everything at first sight, and after each number looked up at me as if to
say, ‘What do you think of it all?’ I maintained that it was good German
music; they must not allow themselves to get confused. But all they did was
to stare at each other in amazement, not knowing what to make of me.
Nevertheless, in the end they could not stand it any longer, and when they
saw that I still retained my gravity, they burst into loud laughter, in which I
could not help joining.
I now had to take them into my confidence, and make them promise to
follow my lead and pretend to be serious, for it was impossible to give up
the opera at this stage. A Viennese ‘colorature’ singer of the latest style—
Madame Spatser Gentiluomo—who came to us from Hanover, and on
whose services Marschner greatly relied, was rather taken with her part
chiefly because it gave her the chance of showing ‘brilliancy.’ And, indeed,
there was a finale in which my ‘German master’ had actually tried to steal a
march on Donizetti. The Princess had been poisoned by a golden rose, a
present from the wicked Bishop of Mainz, and had become delirious.
Adolph von Nassau, with the knights of the German empire, swears
vengeance, and, accompanied by the chorus, pours out his feelings in a
stretta of such incredible vulgarity and amateurishness that Donizetti would
have thrown it at the head of any of his pupils who had dared to compose
such a thing. Marschner now arrived for the dress rehearsal; he was very
pleased, and, without compelling me to falsehood, he gave me sufficient
the orchestra; while I, also, was of the opinion that the too frequent
appearance of outside conductors, even if it were for the purpose of
conducting their own works, would not only lead to confusion, but might
also fail to be as amusing and instructive as Spontini’s visit had proved to
be. It was therefore decided that I should conduct the new opera myself.
And how I lived to regret it!
The score arrived: to a weak plot by Karl Golmick the composer of the
Templer had written such superficial music, that the principal effect lay in a
drinking song for a quartette, in which the German Rhine and German wine
played the usual stereotyped part peculiar to such male quartettes. I lost all
courage; but we had to go on with it now, and all I could do was to try, by
maintaining a grave bearing, to make the singers take an interest in their
task; this, however, was not easy. To Tichatschek and Mitterwurzer were
assigned the two principal male parts; being both eminently musical, they
sang everything at first sight, and after each number looked up at me as if to
say, ‘What do you think of it all?’ I maintained that it was good German
music; they must not allow themselves to get confused. But all they did was
to stare at each other in amazement, not knowing what to make of me.
Nevertheless, in the end they could not stand it any longer, and when they
saw that I still retained my gravity, they burst into loud laughter, in which I
could not help joining.
I now had to take them into my confidence, and make them promise to
follow my lead and pretend to be serious, for it was impossible to give up
the opera at this stage. A Viennese ‘colorature’ singer of the latest style—
Madame Spatser Gentiluomo—who came to us from Hanover, and on
whose services Marschner greatly relied, was rather taken with her part
chiefly because it gave her the chance of showing ‘brilliancy.’ And, indeed,
there was a finale in which my ‘German master’ had actually tried to steal a
march on Donizetti. The Princess had been poisoned by a golden rose, a
present from the wicked Bishop of Mainz, and had become delirious.
Adolph von Nassau, with the knights of the German empire, swears
vengeance, and, accompanied by the chorus, pours out his feelings in a
stretta of such incredible vulgarity and amateurishness that Donizetti would
have thrown it at the head of any of his pupils who had dared to compose
such a thing. Marschner now arrived for the dress rehearsal; he was very
pleased, and, without compelling me to falsehood, he gave me sufficient
Page 325
opportunities for exercising my powers in the art of concealing my real
thoughts. At all events I must have succeeded fairly well, for he had every
reason to think himself considerately and kindly treated by me.
During the performance the public behaved very much as the singers had
done at the rehearsals. We had brought a still-born child into the world. But
Marschner was comforted by the fact that his drinking quartette was
encored. This was reminiscent of one of Becker’s songs: Sie sollen ihn
nicht haben, den freien deutschen Rhein (‘They shall not have it, our free
German Rhine’). After the performance the composer was my guest at a
supper party at which, I am sorry to say, the singers, who had had enough of
it, would not attend. Herr Ferdinand Hiller had the presence of mind to
insist, in his toast to Marschner, that ‘whatever one might say, all stress
must be laid on the GERMAN master and GERMAN art.’ Strangely
enough, Marschner himself contradicted him by saying that there was
something wrong with German operatic compositions, and that one ought to
consider the singers and how to write more brilliantly for their voices than
he had succeeded in doing up to the present.
Highly gifted as Marschner was, there can be no doubt that the decline of
his genius was due partly to a tendency which even in the ageing master
himself, as he frankly admitted, was effecting an important and most
salutary change. In later years I met him once more in Paris at the time of
my memorable production of Tannhäuser. I did not feel inclined to renew
the old relations, for, to tell the truth, I wanted to spare myself the
unpleasantness of witnessing the consequences of his change of views, of
which we had seen the beginning in Dresden. I learned that he was in a state
of almost helpless childishness, and that he was in the hands of a young and
ambitious woman, who was trying to make a last attempt at conquering
Paris for him. Among other puff paragraphs calculated to spread
Marschner’s glory, I read one which said that the Parisians must not believe
that I (Wagner) was representative of German art; no—if only Marschner
were given a hearing, it would be discovered that he was beyond a doubt
better suited to the French taste than I could ever be. Marschner died before
his wife had succeeded in establishing this point.
Ferdinand Hiller, on the other hand, who was in Dresden, behaved in a
very charming and friendly manner, particularly at this time. Meyerbeer
also stayed in the same town from time to time; precisely why, nobody
thoughts. At all events I must have succeeded fairly well, for he had every
reason to think himself considerately and kindly treated by me.
During the performance the public behaved very much as the singers had
done at the rehearsals. We had brought a still-born child into the world. But
Marschner was comforted by the fact that his drinking quartette was
encored. This was reminiscent of one of Becker’s songs: Sie sollen ihn
nicht haben, den freien deutschen Rhein (‘They shall not have it, our free
German Rhine’). After the performance the composer was my guest at a
supper party at which, I am sorry to say, the singers, who had had enough of
it, would not attend. Herr Ferdinand Hiller had the presence of mind to
insist, in his toast to Marschner, that ‘whatever one might say, all stress
must be laid on the GERMAN master and GERMAN art.’ Strangely
enough, Marschner himself contradicted him by saying that there was
something wrong with German operatic compositions, and that one ought to
consider the singers and how to write more brilliantly for their voices than
he had succeeded in doing up to the present.
Highly gifted as Marschner was, there can be no doubt that the decline of
his genius was due partly to a tendency which even in the ageing master
himself, as he frankly admitted, was effecting an important and most
salutary change. In later years I met him once more in Paris at the time of
my memorable production of Tannhäuser. I did not feel inclined to renew
the old relations, for, to tell the truth, I wanted to spare myself the
unpleasantness of witnessing the consequences of his change of views, of
which we had seen the beginning in Dresden. I learned that he was in a state
of almost helpless childishness, and that he was in the hands of a young and
ambitious woman, who was trying to make a last attempt at conquering
Paris for him. Among other puff paragraphs calculated to spread
Marschner’s glory, I read one which said that the Parisians must not believe
that I (Wagner) was representative of German art; no—if only Marschner
were given a hearing, it would be discovered that he was beyond a doubt
better suited to the French taste than I could ever be. Marschner died before
his wife had succeeded in establishing this point.
Ferdinand Hiller, on the other hand, who was in Dresden, behaved in a
very charming and friendly manner, particularly at this time. Meyerbeer
also stayed in the same town from time to time; precisely why, nobody
Page 326
knew. Once he had rented a little house for the summer near the Pirnaischer
Schlag, and under a pretty tree in the garden of this place he had had a small
piano installed, whereon, in this idyllic retreat, he worked at his Feldlager in
Schlesien. He lived in great retirement, and I saw very little of him.
Ferdinand Hiller, on the contrary, took a commanding position in the
Dresden musical world in so far as this was not already monopolised by the
royal orchestra and its masters, and for many years he worked hard for its
success. Having a little private capital, he established himself comfortably
amongst us, and was soon known as a delightful host, who kept a pleasant
house, which, thanks to his wife’s influence, was frequented by a numerous
Polish colony. Frau Hiller was indeed an exceptional Jewish woman of
Polish origin, and she was perhaps all the more exceptional seeing that she,
in company with her husband, had been baptized a Protestant in Italy. Hiller
began his career in Dresden with the production of his opera, Der Traum in
der Christnacht. Since the unheard-of fact that Rienzi had been able to rouse
the Dresden public to lasting enthusiasm, many an opera composer had felt
himself drawn towards our ‘Florence on the Elbe,’ of which Laube once
said that as soon as one entered it one felt bound to apologise because one
found so many good things there which one promptly forgot the moment
one departed.
The composer of Der Traum in der Christnacht looked upon this work as
a peculiarly ‘German composition.’ Hiller had set to music a gruesome play
by Raupach, Der Muller und sein Kind (‘The Miller and his Child’), in
which father and daughter, within but a short space of time, both die of
consumption. He declared that he had conceived the dialogue and the music
of this opera in what he called the ‘popular style,’ but this work met with
the same fate as that which, according to Liszt, befell all his compositions.
In spite of his undoubted musical merits, which even Rossini
acknowledged, and whether he gave them in French in Paris or in Italian in
Italy, it was his sad experience always to see his operas fail. In Germany he
had tried the Mendelssohnian style, and had succeeded in composing an
oratorio called Die Zerstorung Jerusalems, which luckily was not taken
notice of by the moody theatre-going public, and which consequently
received the unassailable reputation of being ‘a solid German work.’ He
also took Mendelssohn’s place as director of the Leipzig Gewandhaus
concerts when the latter was called to Berlin in the capacity of general
director. Hiller’s evil fortune still pursued him, however, and he was unable
Schlag, and under a pretty tree in the garden of this place he had had a small
piano installed, whereon, in this idyllic retreat, he worked at his Feldlager in
Schlesien. He lived in great retirement, and I saw very little of him.
Ferdinand Hiller, on the contrary, took a commanding position in the
Dresden musical world in so far as this was not already monopolised by the
royal orchestra and its masters, and for many years he worked hard for its
success. Having a little private capital, he established himself comfortably
amongst us, and was soon known as a delightful host, who kept a pleasant
house, which, thanks to his wife’s influence, was frequented by a numerous
Polish colony. Frau Hiller was indeed an exceptional Jewish woman of
Polish origin, and she was perhaps all the more exceptional seeing that she,
in company with her husband, had been baptized a Protestant in Italy. Hiller
began his career in Dresden with the production of his opera, Der Traum in
der Christnacht. Since the unheard-of fact that Rienzi had been able to rouse
the Dresden public to lasting enthusiasm, many an opera composer had felt
himself drawn towards our ‘Florence on the Elbe,’ of which Laube once
said that as soon as one entered it one felt bound to apologise because one
found so many good things there which one promptly forgot the moment
one departed.
The composer of Der Traum in der Christnacht looked upon this work as
a peculiarly ‘German composition.’ Hiller had set to music a gruesome play
by Raupach, Der Muller und sein Kind (‘The Miller and his Child’), in
which father and daughter, within but a short space of time, both die of
consumption. He declared that he had conceived the dialogue and the music
of this opera in what he called the ‘popular style,’ but this work met with
the same fate as that which, according to Liszt, befell all his compositions.
In spite of his undoubted musical merits, which even Rossini
acknowledged, and whether he gave them in French in Paris or in Italian in
Italy, it was his sad experience always to see his operas fail. In Germany he
had tried the Mendelssohnian style, and had succeeded in composing an
oratorio called Die Zerstorung Jerusalems, which luckily was not taken
notice of by the moody theatre-going public, and which consequently
received the unassailable reputation of being ‘a solid German work.’ He
also took Mendelssohn’s place as director of the Leipzig Gewandhaus
concerts when the latter was called to Berlin in the capacity of general
director. Hiller’s evil fortune still pursued him, however, and he was unable
Page 327
to retain his position, everybody being given to understand that it was
because his wife was not sufficiently acknowledged as concert prima-
donna. Mendelssohn returned and made Hiller leave, and Hiller boasted of
having quarrelled with him.
Dresden and the success of my Rienzi now weighed so much upon his
mind that he naturally made another attempt to succeed as an opera
composer. Owing to his great energy, and to his position as son of a rich
banker (a special attraction even to the director of a court theatre), it
happened that he induced them to put aside my poor friend Röckel’s
Farinelli (the production of which had been promised him) in favour of his
(Hiller’s) own work, Der Traum in der Christnacht. He was of the opinion
that next to Reissiger and myself, a man of greater musical reputation than
Röckel was needed. Lüttichau, however, was quite content to have
Reissiger and myself as celebrities, particularly as we got on so well
together, and he remained deaf to Hiller’s wishes. To me Der Traum in der
Christnacht was a great nuisance. I had to conduct it a second time, and
before an empty house. Hiller now saw that he had been wrong in not
taking my advice before, and in not shortening the opera by one act and
altering the end, and he now fancied that he was doing me a great favour by
at last declaring himself ready to act on my suggestion in the event of
another performance of his opera being possible. I really managed to have it
played once more. This was, however, to be the last time, and Hiller, who
had read my book of Tannhäuser, thought that I had a great advantage over
him in writing my own words. He therefore made me promise to help him
with the choice and writing of a subject for his next opera.
Shortly afterwards Hiller was present at a performance of Rienzi, which
was again given before a crowded and enthusiastic house. When, at the end
of the second act, and after frantic recalls from the audience, I left the
orchestra in a great state of excitement, Hiller, who was waiting for me in
the passage, took the opportunity of adding to his very hasty
congratulations, ‘Do give my Traum once more!’ I promised him laughingly
to do this if I had the chance, but I cannot remember whether it came off or
not. While he was waiting for the creation of an entirely new plot for his
next opera, Hiller devoted himself to the study of chamber music, to which
his large and well-furnished room lent itself most admirably.
because his wife was not sufficiently acknowledged as concert prima-
donna. Mendelssohn returned and made Hiller leave, and Hiller boasted of
having quarrelled with him.
Dresden and the success of my Rienzi now weighed so much upon his
mind that he naturally made another attempt to succeed as an opera
composer. Owing to his great energy, and to his position as son of a rich
banker (a special attraction even to the director of a court theatre), it
happened that he induced them to put aside my poor friend Röckel’s
Farinelli (the production of which had been promised him) in favour of his
(Hiller’s) own work, Der Traum in der Christnacht. He was of the opinion
that next to Reissiger and myself, a man of greater musical reputation than
Röckel was needed. Lüttichau, however, was quite content to have
Reissiger and myself as celebrities, particularly as we got on so well
together, and he remained deaf to Hiller’s wishes. To me Der Traum in der
Christnacht was a great nuisance. I had to conduct it a second time, and
before an empty house. Hiller now saw that he had been wrong in not
taking my advice before, and in not shortening the opera by one act and
altering the end, and he now fancied that he was doing me a great favour by
at last declaring himself ready to act on my suggestion in the event of
another performance of his opera being possible. I really managed to have it
played once more. This was, however, to be the last time, and Hiller, who
had read my book of Tannhäuser, thought that I had a great advantage over
him in writing my own words. He therefore made me promise to help him
with the choice and writing of a subject for his next opera.
Shortly afterwards Hiller was present at a performance of Rienzi, which
was again given before a crowded and enthusiastic house. When, at the end
of the second act, and after frantic recalls from the audience, I left the
orchestra in a great state of excitement, Hiller, who was waiting for me in
the passage, took the opportunity of adding to his very hasty
congratulations, ‘Do give my Traum once more!’ I promised him laughingly
to do this if I had the chance, but I cannot remember whether it came off or
not. While he was waiting for the creation of an entirely new plot for his
next opera, Hiller devoted himself to the study of chamber music, to which
his large and well-furnished room lent itself most admirably.
Page 328
A beautiful and solemn event added to the seriousness of the mood in
which I finished the music to Tannhäuser towards the end of the year, and
neutralised the more superficial impressions made upon me by the stirring
events above described. This was the removal of the remains of Carl Maria
von Weber from London to Dresden in December, 1844. As I have already
said, a committee had for years been agitating for this removal. From
information given by a certain traveller, it had become known that the
insignificant coffin which contained Weber’s ashes had been disposed of in
such a careless way in a remote corner of St. Paul’s, that it was feared it
might soon become impossible to identify it.
My energetic friend, Professor Lowe, whom I have already mentioned,
had availed himself of this information in order to urge the Dresden Glee
Club, which constituted his hobby, to take the matter in hand. The concert
of male singers arranged to this end had been a fair success financially, and
they now wanted to induce the theatre management to make similar efforts,
when suddenly they met with serious opposition from this very quarter. The
management of the Dresden theatre told the committee that the King had
religious scruples with regard to disturbing the peace of the dead. However
much we felt inclined to doubt the genuineness of these reasons, nothing
could be done, and I was next approached on the subject, in the hope that
my influential position might lend weight to my appeal. I entered into the
spirit of the enterprise with great fervour. I consented to be made president;
Herr Hofrat Schulz, director of the ‘Antiken-Cabinet,’ who was a well-
known authority on artistic matters, and another gentleman, a Christian
banker, were also elected members of the committee, and the movement
thus received fresh life. Prospectuses were sent round, exhaustive plans
were made, and numerous meetings held. Here, again, I met with opposition
on the part of my chief, Lüttichau; if he could have done so, he would have
forbidden me to move in the matter by making the most of the King’s
scruples referred to above. But he had had a warning not to pick a quarrel
with me after his experience in the summer, when, contrary to his
expectations, the music written by me to celebrate the King’s arrival had
found favour with the monarch. As his antipathy to the proceedings was not
so very serious, Lüttichau must have seen that even the direct opposition of
his Majesty could not have prevented the enterprise from being carried out
privately, and that, on the contrary, the court would cut a sorry figure if the
Royal Court Theatre (to which Weber once belonged) should assume a
which I finished the music to Tannhäuser towards the end of the year, and
neutralised the more superficial impressions made upon me by the stirring
events above described. This was the removal of the remains of Carl Maria
von Weber from London to Dresden in December, 1844. As I have already
said, a committee had for years been agitating for this removal. From
information given by a certain traveller, it had become known that the
insignificant coffin which contained Weber’s ashes had been disposed of in
such a careless way in a remote corner of St. Paul’s, that it was feared it
might soon become impossible to identify it.
My energetic friend, Professor Lowe, whom I have already mentioned,
had availed himself of this information in order to urge the Dresden Glee
Club, which constituted his hobby, to take the matter in hand. The concert
of male singers arranged to this end had been a fair success financially, and
they now wanted to induce the theatre management to make similar efforts,
when suddenly they met with serious opposition from this very quarter. The
management of the Dresden theatre told the committee that the King had
religious scruples with regard to disturbing the peace of the dead. However
much we felt inclined to doubt the genuineness of these reasons, nothing
could be done, and I was next approached on the subject, in the hope that
my influential position might lend weight to my appeal. I entered into the
spirit of the enterprise with great fervour. I consented to be made president;
Herr Hofrat Schulz, director of the ‘Antiken-Cabinet,’ who was a well-
known authority on artistic matters, and another gentleman, a Christian
banker, were also elected members of the committee, and the movement
thus received fresh life. Prospectuses were sent round, exhaustive plans
were made, and numerous meetings held. Here, again, I met with opposition
on the part of my chief, Lüttichau; if he could have done so, he would have
forbidden me to move in the matter by making the most of the King’s
scruples referred to above. But he had had a warning not to pick a quarrel
with me after his experience in the summer, when, contrary to his
expectations, the music written by me to celebrate the King’s arrival had
found favour with the monarch. As his antipathy to the proceedings was not
so very serious, Lüttichau must have seen that even the direct opposition of
his Majesty could not have prevented the enterprise from being carried out
privately, and that, on the contrary, the court would cut a sorry figure if the
Royal Court Theatre (to which Weber once belonged) should assume a
Page 329
hostile attitude. He therefore tried in a would-be friendly way to make me
desist from furthering the cause, well knowing that, without me, the plan
would fail. He tried to convince me that it would be wrong to pay this
exaggerated honour to Weber’s memory, whereas nobody thought of
removing the ashes of Morlacchi from Italy, although the latter had given
his services to the royal orchestra for a much longer period than Weber had
done. What would be the consequence? By way of argument he said,
‘Suppose Reissiger died on his journey to some watering-place—his wife
would then be as much justified as was Frau von Weber (who had annoyed
him quite enough already) in expecting her husband’s dead body to be
brought home with music and pomp.’ I tried to calm him, and if I did not
succeed in making him see the difference between Reissiger and Weber, I
managed to make him understand that the affair must take its course, as the
Berlin Court Theatre had already announced a benefit performance to
support our undertaking.
Meyerbeer, to whom my committee had applied, was instrumental in
bringing this about, and a performance of Euryanthe was actually given
which yielded the handsome balance of six thousand marks. A few theatres
of lesser importance now followed our lead. The Dresden Court Theatre,
therefore, could not hold back any longer, and as we now had a fairly large
sum at the bank, we were able to cover the expenses of the removal, as well
as the cost of an appropriate vault and monument; we even had a nucleus
fund for a statue of Weber, which we were to fight for later on. The elder of
the two sons of the immortal master travelled to London to fetch the
remains of his father. He brought them by boat down the Elbe, and finally
arrived at the Dresden landing-stage, from whence they were to be
conducted to German soil. This last journey of the remains was to take
place at night. A solemn torchlight procession was to be formed, and I had
undertaken to see to the funeral music.
I arranged this from two motives out of Euryanthe, using that part of the
music in the overture which relates to the vision of spirits. I introduced the
Cavatina from Euryanthe—Hier dicht am Quell (‘Here near the source’),
which I left unaltered, except that I transposed it into B flat major, and I
finished the whole, as Weber finished his opera, by a return to the first
sublime motive. I had orchestrated this symphonic piece, which was well
suited to the purpose, for eight chosen wind instruments, and
notwithstanding the volume of sound, I had not forgotten softness and
desist from furthering the cause, well knowing that, without me, the plan
would fail. He tried to convince me that it would be wrong to pay this
exaggerated honour to Weber’s memory, whereas nobody thought of
removing the ashes of Morlacchi from Italy, although the latter had given
his services to the royal orchestra for a much longer period than Weber had
done. What would be the consequence? By way of argument he said,
‘Suppose Reissiger died on his journey to some watering-place—his wife
would then be as much justified as was Frau von Weber (who had annoyed
him quite enough already) in expecting her husband’s dead body to be
brought home with music and pomp.’ I tried to calm him, and if I did not
succeed in making him see the difference between Reissiger and Weber, I
managed to make him understand that the affair must take its course, as the
Berlin Court Theatre had already announced a benefit performance to
support our undertaking.
Meyerbeer, to whom my committee had applied, was instrumental in
bringing this about, and a performance of Euryanthe was actually given
which yielded the handsome balance of six thousand marks. A few theatres
of lesser importance now followed our lead. The Dresden Court Theatre,
therefore, could not hold back any longer, and as we now had a fairly large
sum at the bank, we were able to cover the expenses of the removal, as well
as the cost of an appropriate vault and monument; we even had a nucleus
fund for a statue of Weber, which we were to fight for later on. The elder of
the two sons of the immortal master travelled to London to fetch the
remains of his father. He brought them by boat down the Elbe, and finally
arrived at the Dresden landing-stage, from whence they were to be
conducted to German soil. This last journey of the remains was to take
place at night. A solemn torchlight procession was to be formed, and I had
undertaken to see to the funeral music.
I arranged this from two motives out of Euryanthe, using that part of the
music in the overture which relates to the vision of spirits. I introduced the
Cavatina from Euryanthe—Hier dicht am Quell (‘Here near the source’),
which I left unaltered, except that I transposed it into B flat major, and I
finished the whole, as Weber finished his opera, by a return to the first
sublime motive. I had orchestrated this symphonic piece, which was well
suited to the purpose, for eight chosen wind instruments, and
notwithstanding the volume of sound, I had not forgotten softness and
Page 330
delicacy of instrumentation. I substituted the gruesome tremolo of the
violas, which appears in that part of the overture adapted by me, by twenty
muffled drums, and as a whole attained to such an exceedingly impressive
effect, especially to us who were full of thoughts of Weber, that, even in the
theatre where we rehearsed, Schroder-Devrient, who was present, and who
had been an intimate friend of Weber’s, was deeply moved. I had never
carried out anything more in keeping with the character of the subject; and
the procession through the town was equally impressive.
As the very slow tempo, devoid of any strongly marked accents, offered
numerous difficulties, I had had the stage cleared for the rehearsal, in order
to command a sufficient space for the musicians, once they had thoroughly
practised the piece, to walk round me in a circle playing all the while.
Several of those who witnessed the procession from their windows assured
me that the effect of the procession was indescribably and sublimely
solemn. After we had placed the coffin in the little mortuary chapel of the
Catholic cemetery in Friedrichstadt, where Madame Devrient met it with a
wreath of flowers, we performed, on the following morning, the solemn
ceremony of lowering it into the vault. Herr Hofrat Schulz and myself, as
presidents of the committee, were allowed the honour of speaking by the
graveside, and what afforded me an appropriate subject for the few,
somewhat affecting, words which I had to pronounce, was the fact that,
shortly before the removal of Weber’s remains, the second son of the
master, Alexander von Weber, had died. The poor mother had been so
terribly affected by the sudden death of this youth, so full of life and health,
that had we not been in the very midst of our arrangements, we should have
been compelled to abandon them; for in this new loss the widow saw a
judgment of God who, in her opinion, looked upon the removal of the
remains as an act of sacrilege prompted by vanity. As the public seemed
particularly disposed to hold the same view, it fell to my lot to set the nature
of our undertaking in the proper light before the eyes of the world. And this
I so far succeeded in doing that, to my satisfaction, I learned from all sides
that my justification of our action had received the most general acceptance.
On this occasion I had a strange experience with regard to myself, when
for the first time in my life I had to deliver a solemn public speech. Since
then I have always spoken extemporarily; this time, however, as it was my
first appearance as an orator, I had written out my speech, and carefully
learned it by heart. As I was thoroughly under the influence of my subject, I
violas, which appears in that part of the overture adapted by me, by twenty
muffled drums, and as a whole attained to such an exceedingly impressive
effect, especially to us who were full of thoughts of Weber, that, even in the
theatre where we rehearsed, Schroder-Devrient, who was present, and who
had been an intimate friend of Weber’s, was deeply moved. I had never
carried out anything more in keeping with the character of the subject; and
the procession through the town was equally impressive.
As the very slow tempo, devoid of any strongly marked accents, offered
numerous difficulties, I had had the stage cleared for the rehearsal, in order
to command a sufficient space for the musicians, once they had thoroughly
practised the piece, to walk round me in a circle playing all the while.
Several of those who witnessed the procession from their windows assured
me that the effect of the procession was indescribably and sublimely
solemn. After we had placed the coffin in the little mortuary chapel of the
Catholic cemetery in Friedrichstadt, where Madame Devrient met it with a
wreath of flowers, we performed, on the following morning, the solemn
ceremony of lowering it into the vault. Herr Hofrat Schulz and myself, as
presidents of the committee, were allowed the honour of speaking by the
graveside, and what afforded me an appropriate subject for the few,
somewhat affecting, words which I had to pronounce, was the fact that,
shortly before the removal of Weber’s remains, the second son of the
master, Alexander von Weber, had died. The poor mother had been so
terribly affected by the sudden death of this youth, so full of life and health,
that had we not been in the very midst of our arrangements, we should have
been compelled to abandon them; for in this new loss the widow saw a
judgment of God who, in her opinion, looked upon the removal of the
remains as an act of sacrilege prompted by vanity. As the public seemed
particularly disposed to hold the same view, it fell to my lot to set the nature
of our undertaking in the proper light before the eyes of the world. And this
I so far succeeded in doing that, to my satisfaction, I learned from all sides
that my justification of our action had received the most general acceptance.
On this occasion I had a strange experience with regard to myself, when
for the first time in my life I had to deliver a solemn public speech. Since
then I have always spoken extemporarily; this time, however, as it was my
first appearance as an orator, I had written out my speech, and carefully
learned it by heart. As I was thoroughly under the influence of my subject, I
Page 331
felt so sure of my memory that I never thought of making any notes. Thanks
to this omission, however, I made my brother Albert very unhappy. He was
standing near me at the ceremony, and he told me afterwards that, in spite
of being deeply moved, he felt at one moment as if he could have sworn at
me for not having asked him to prompt me. It happened in this way: I began
my speech in a clear and full voice, but suddenly the sound of my own
words, and their particular intonation, affected me to such an extent that,
carried away as I was by my own thoughts, I imagined I SAW as well as
HEARD myself before the breathless multitude. While I thus appeared
objectively to myself I remained in a sort of trance, during which I seemed
to be waiting for something to happen, and felt quite a different person from
the man who was supposed to be standing and speaking there. It was neither
nervousness nor absent-mindedness on my part; only at the end of a certain
sentence there was such a long pause that those who saw me standing there
must have wondered what on earth to think of me. At last my own silence
and the stillness round me reminded me that I was not there to listen, but to
speak. I at once resumed my discourse, and I spoke with such fluency to the
very end that the celebrated actor, Emil Devrient, assured me that, apart
from the solemn service, he had been deeply impressed simply from the
standpoint of a dramatic orator.
The ceremony concluded with a poem written and set to music by
myself, and, though it presented many difficulties for men’s voices, it was
splendidly rendered by some of the best opera singers. Lüttichau, who was
present, was now not only convinced of the justice of the enterprise, but
also strongly in favour of it. I was deeply thankful that everything had
succeeded so well, and when Weber’s widow, upon whom I called after the
ceremony, told me how profoundly she, too, had been moved, the only
cloud that still darkened my horizon was dispelled. In my youth I had
learned to love music through my admiration for Weber’s genius, and the
news of his death was a terrible blow to me. To have, as it were, come into
contact with him again and after so many years by this second funeral, was
an event that stirred the very depths of my being.
From all the particulars I have given concerning my intimacy with the
great masters who were my contemporaries, it is easy to see at what sources
I had been able to quench my thirst for intellectual intercourse. It was not a
very satisfactory outlook to turn from Weber’s grave to his living
successors; but I had still to find out how absolutely hopeless this was.
to this omission, however, I made my brother Albert very unhappy. He was
standing near me at the ceremony, and he told me afterwards that, in spite
of being deeply moved, he felt at one moment as if he could have sworn at
me for not having asked him to prompt me. It happened in this way: I began
my speech in a clear and full voice, but suddenly the sound of my own
words, and their particular intonation, affected me to such an extent that,
carried away as I was by my own thoughts, I imagined I SAW as well as
HEARD myself before the breathless multitude. While I thus appeared
objectively to myself I remained in a sort of trance, during which I seemed
to be waiting for something to happen, and felt quite a different person from
the man who was supposed to be standing and speaking there. It was neither
nervousness nor absent-mindedness on my part; only at the end of a certain
sentence there was such a long pause that those who saw me standing there
must have wondered what on earth to think of me. At last my own silence
and the stillness round me reminded me that I was not there to listen, but to
speak. I at once resumed my discourse, and I spoke with such fluency to the
very end that the celebrated actor, Emil Devrient, assured me that, apart
from the solemn service, he had been deeply impressed simply from the
standpoint of a dramatic orator.
The ceremony concluded with a poem written and set to music by
myself, and, though it presented many difficulties for men’s voices, it was
splendidly rendered by some of the best opera singers. Lüttichau, who was
present, was now not only convinced of the justice of the enterprise, but
also strongly in favour of it. I was deeply thankful that everything had
succeeded so well, and when Weber’s widow, upon whom I called after the
ceremony, told me how profoundly she, too, had been moved, the only
cloud that still darkened my horizon was dispelled. In my youth I had
learned to love music through my admiration for Weber’s genius, and the
news of his death was a terrible blow to me. To have, as it were, come into
contact with him again and after so many years by this second funeral, was
an event that stirred the very depths of my being.
From all the particulars I have given concerning my intimacy with the
great masters who were my contemporaries, it is easy to see at what sources
I had been able to quench my thirst for intellectual intercourse. It was not a
very satisfactory outlook to turn from Weber’s grave to his living
successors; but I had still to find out how absolutely hopeless this was.
Page 332
I spent the winter of 1844-5 partly in yielding to attractions from outside,
and partly in indulging in the deepest meditation. By dint of great energy,
and by getting up very early, even in winter, I succeeded in completing my
score to Tannhäuser early in April, having, as already stated, finished the
composition of it at the end of the preceding year. In writing down the
orchestration I made things particularly difficult for myself by using the
specially prepared paper which the printing process renders necessary, and
which involved me in all kinds of trying formalities. I had each page
transferred to the stone immediately, and a hundred copies printed from
each, hoping to make use of these proofs for the rapid circulation of my
work. Whether my hopes were to be fulfilled or not, I was at all events
fifteen hundred marks out of pocket when all the expenses of the
publication were paid.
In regard to this work which called for so many sacrifices, and which was
so slow and difficult, more details will appear in my autobiography. At all
events, when May came round I was in possession of a hundred neatly
bound copies of my first new work since the production of the Fliegender
Holländer, and Hiller, to whom I showed some parts of it, formed a
tolerably good impression of its value.
These plans for rapidly spreading the fame of my Tannhäuser were made
with the hope of a success which, in view of my needy circumstances,
seemed ever more and more desirable. In the course of one year since I had
begun my own publication of my operas, much had been done to this end.
In September of the year 1844 I had presented the King of Saxony with a
special richly bound copy of the complete pianoforte arrangement of
Rienzi, dedicated to his Majesty. The Fliegender Holländer had also been
finished, and the pianoforte arrangement of Rienzi for duet, as well as some
songs selected from both operas, had either been published or were about to
be published. Apart from this I had had twenty-five copies made of the
scores of both these operas by means of the so-called autographic transfer
process, although only from the writing of the copyists. All these heavy
expenses made it absolutely imperative that I should try to send my scores
to the different theatres, and induce them to produce my operas, as the
outlay on the piano scores had been heavy, and these could only have a sale
if my works got to be known sufficiently well through the theatre.
and partly in indulging in the deepest meditation. By dint of great energy,
and by getting up very early, even in winter, I succeeded in completing my
score to Tannhäuser early in April, having, as already stated, finished the
composition of it at the end of the preceding year. In writing down the
orchestration I made things particularly difficult for myself by using the
specially prepared paper which the printing process renders necessary, and
which involved me in all kinds of trying formalities. I had each page
transferred to the stone immediately, and a hundred copies printed from
each, hoping to make use of these proofs for the rapid circulation of my
work. Whether my hopes were to be fulfilled or not, I was at all events
fifteen hundred marks out of pocket when all the expenses of the
publication were paid.
In regard to this work which called for so many sacrifices, and which was
so slow and difficult, more details will appear in my autobiography. At all
events, when May came round I was in possession of a hundred neatly
bound copies of my first new work since the production of the Fliegender
Holländer, and Hiller, to whom I showed some parts of it, formed a
tolerably good impression of its value.
These plans for rapidly spreading the fame of my Tannhäuser were made
with the hope of a success which, in view of my needy circumstances,
seemed ever more and more desirable. In the course of one year since I had
begun my own publication of my operas, much had been done to this end.
In September of the year 1844 I had presented the King of Saxony with a
special richly bound copy of the complete pianoforte arrangement of
Rienzi, dedicated to his Majesty. The Fliegender Holländer had also been
finished, and the pianoforte arrangement of Rienzi for duet, as well as some
songs selected from both operas, had either been published or were about to
be published. Apart from this I had had twenty-five copies made of the
scores of both these operas by means of the so-called autographic transfer
process, although only from the writing of the copyists. All these heavy
expenses made it absolutely imperative that I should try to send my scores
to the different theatres, and induce them to produce my operas, as the
outlay on the piano scores had been heavy, and these could only have a sale
if my works got to be known sufficiently well through the theatre.
Page 333
I now sent the score of my Rienzi to the more important theatres, but they
all returned my work to me, the Munich Court Theatre even sending it back
unopened! I therefore knew what to expect, and spared myself the trouble
of sending my Dutchman. From a speculative business point of view the
situation was this: the hoped-for success of Tannhäuser would bring in its
wake a demand for my earlier works. The worthy Meser, my agent, who
was the music publisher appointed to the court, had also begun to feel a
little doubtful, and saw that this was the only thing to do. I started at once
on the publication of a pianoforte arrangement of Tannhäuser, preparing it
myself while Röckel undertook the Fliegender Holländer, and a certain
Klink did Rienzi.
The only thing that Meser was absolutely opposed to was the title of my
new opera, which I had just named Der Venusberg; he maintained that, as I
did not mix with the public, I had no idea what horrible jokes were made
about this title. He said the students and professors of the medical school in
Dresden would be the first to make fun of it, as they had a predilection for
that kind of obscene joke. I was sufficiently disgusted by these details to
consent to the change. To the name of my hero, Tannhäuser, I added the
name of the subject of the legend which, although originally not belonging
to the Tannhäuser myth, was thus associated with it by me, a fact which
later on Simrock, the great investigator and innovator in the world of
legend, whom I esteemed so highly, took very much amiss.
Tannhäuser und der Sangerkrieg auf Wartburg should henceforth be its
title, and to give the work a mediaeval appearance I had the words specially
printed in Gothic characters upon the piano arrangement, and in this way
introduced the work to the public.
The extra expenses this involved were very heavy; but I went to great
pains to impress Meser with my belief in the success of my work. So deeply
were we involved in this scheme, and so great were the sacrifices it had
compelled us to make, that there was nothing else for it but to trust to a
special turn of Fortune’s wheel. As it happened, the management of the
theatre shared my confidence in the success of Tannhäuser. I had induced
Lüttichau to have the scenery for Tannhäuser painted by the best painters of
the great opera house in Paris. I had seen their work on the Dresden stage: it
belonged to the style of German scenic art which was then fashionable, and
really gave the effect of first-class work.
all returned my work to me, the Munich Court Theatre even sending it back
unopened! I therefore knew what to expect, and spared myself the trouble
of sending my Dutchman. From a speculative business point of view the
situation was this: the hoped-for success of Tannhäuser would bring in its
wake a demand for my earlier works. The worthy Meser, my agent, who
was the music publisher appointed to the court, had also begun to feel a
little doubtful, and saw that this was the only thing to do. I started at once
on the publication of a pianoforte arrangement of Tannhäuser, preparing it
myself while Röckel undertook the Fliegender Holländer, and a certain
Klink did Rienzi.
The only thing that Meser was absolutely opposed to was the title of my
new opera, which I had just named Der Venusberg; he maintained that, as I
did not mix with the public, I had no idea what horrible jokes were made
about this title. He said the students and professors of the medical school in
Dresden would be the first to make fun of it, as they had a predilection for
that kind of obscene joke. I was sufficiently disgusted by these details to
consent to the change. To the name of my hero, Tannhäuser, I added the
name of the subject of the legend which, although originally not belonging
to the Tannhäuser myth, was thus associated with it by me, a fact which
later on Simrock, the great investigator and innovator in the world of
legend, whom I esteemed so highly, took very much amiss.
Tannhäuser und der Sangerkrieg auf Wartburg should henceforth be its
title, and to give the work a mediaeval appearance I had the words specially
printed in Gothic characters upon the piano arrangement, and in this way
introduced the work to the public.
The extra expenses this involved were very heavy; but I went to great
pains to impress Meser with my belief in the success of my work. So deeply
were we involved in this scheme, and so great were the sacrifices it had
compelled us to make, that there was nothing else for it but to trust to a
special turn of Fortune’s wheel. As it happened, the management of the
theatre shared my confidence in the success of Tannhäuser. I had induced
Lüttichau to have the scenery for Tannhäuser painted by the best painters of
the great opera house in Paris. I had seen their work on the Dresden stage: it
belonged to the style of German scenic art which was then fashionable, and
really gave the effect of first-class work.
Page 334
The order for this, as well as the necessary negotiations with the Parisian
painter, Desplechin, had already been settled in the preceding autumn. The
management agreed to all my wishes, even to the ordering of beautiful
costumes of mediaeval character designed by my friend Heine. The only
thing Lüttichau constantly postponed was the order for the Hall of Song on
the Wartburg; he maintained that the Hall for Kaiser Karl the Great in
Oberon, which had only recently been delivered by some French painters,
would answer the purpose just as well. With superhuman efforts I had to
convince my chief that we did not want a brilliant throne-room, but a scenic
picture of a certain character such as I saw before my mind’s eye, and that it
could be painted only according to my directions. As in the end I became
very irritable and cross, he soothed me by saying that he had no objection to
having this scene painted, and that he would order it to be commenced at
once, adding that he had not agreed immediately, only with the view of
making my joy the greater, because, what one obtained without difficulty,
one rarely appreciated. This Hall of Song was fated to cause me great
trouble later on.
Thus everything was in full swing; circumstances were favourable, and
seemed to cast a hopeful light upon the production of my new work at the
beginning of the autumn season. Even the public was looking forward to it,
and for the first time I saw my name mentioned in a friendly manner in a
communication to the Allgemeine Zeitung. They actually spoke of the great
expectations they had of my new work, the poem of which had been written
‘with undoubted poetic feeling.’
Full of hope, I started in July on my holiday, which consisted of a
journey to Marienbad in Bohemia, where my wife and I intended to take the
cure. Again I found myself on the ‘volcanic’ soil of this extraordinary
country, Bohemia, which always had such an inspiring effect on me. It was
a marvellous summer, almost too hot, and I was therefore in high spirits. I
had intended to follow the easy-going mode of life which is a necessary part
of this somewhat trying treatment, and had selected my books with care,
taking with me the poems of Wolfram von Eschenbach, edited by Simrock
and San Marte, as well as the anonymous epic Lohengrin, with its lengthy
introduction by Gorres. With my book under my arm I hid myself in the
neighbouring woods, and pitching my tent by the brook in company with
Titurel and Parcival, I lost myself in Wolfram’s strange, yet irresistibly
charming, poem. Soon, however, a longing seized me to give expression to
painter, Desplechin, had already been settled in the preceding autumn. The
management agreed to all my wishes, even to the ordering of beautiful
costumes of mediaeval character designed by my friend Heine. The only
thing Lüttichau constantly postponed was the order for the Hall of Song on
the Wartburg; he maintained that the Hall for Kaiser Karl the Great in
Oberon, which had only recently been delivered by some French painters,
would answer the purpose just as well. With superhuman efforts I had to
convince my chief that we did not want a brilliant throne-room, but a scenic
picture of a certain character such as I saw before my mind’s eye, and that it
could be painted only according to my directions. As in the end I became
very irritable and cross, he soothed me by saying that he had no objection to
having this scene painted, and that he would order it to be commenced at
once, adding that he had not agreed immediately, only with the view of
making my joy the greater, because, what one obtained without difficulty,
one rarely appreciated. This Hall of Song was fated to cause me great
trouble later on.
Thus everything was in full swing; circumstances were favourable, and
seemed to cast a hopeful light upon the production of my new work at the
beginning of the autumn season. Even the public was looking forward to it,
and for the first time I saw my name mentioned in a friendly manner in a
communication to the Allgemeine Zeitung. They actually spoke of the great
expectations they had of my new work, the poem of which had been written
‘with undoubted poetic feeling.’
Full of hope, I started in July on my holiday, which consisted of a
journey to Marienbad in Bohemia, where my wife and I intended to take the
cure. Again I found myself on the ‘volcanic’ soil of this extraordinary
country, Bohemia, which always had such an inspiring effect on me. It was
a marvellous summer, almost too hot, and I was therefore in high spirits. I
had intended to follow the easy-going mode of life which is a necessary part
of this somewhat trying treatment, and had selected my books with care,
taking with me the poems of Wolfram von Eschenbach, edited by Simrock
and San Marte, as well as the anonymous epic Lohengrin, with its lengthy
introduction by Gorres. With my book under my arm I hid myself in the
neighbouring woods, and pitching my tent by the brook in company with
Titurel and Parcival, I lost myself in Wolfram’s strange, yet irresistibly
charming, poem. Soon, however, a longing seized me to give expression to
Page 335
the inspiration generated by this poem, so that I had the greatest difficulty in
overcoming my desire to give up the rest I had been prescribed while
partaking of the water of Marienbad.
The result was an ever-increasing state of excitement. Lohengrin, the first
conception of which dates from the end of my time in Paris, stood suddenly
revealed before me, complete in every detail of its dramatic construction.
The legend of the swan which forms such an important feature of all the
many versions of this series of myths that my studies had brought to my
notice, exercised a singular fascination over my imagination.
Remembering the doctor’s advice, I struggled bravely against the
temptation of writing down my ideas, and resorted to the most strange and
energetic methods. Owing to some comments I had read in Gervinus’s
History of German Literature, both the Meistersinger von Nurnberg and
Hans Sachs had acquired quite a vital charm for me. The Marker alone, and
the part he takes in the Master-singing, were particularly pleasing to me,
and on one of my lonely walks, without knowing anything particular about
Hans Sachs and his poetic contemporaries, I thought out a humorous scene,
in which the cobbler—as a popular artisan-poet—with the hammer on his
last, gives the Marker a practical lesson by making him sing, thereby taking
revenge on him for his conventional misdeeds. To me the force of the whole
scene was concentrated in the two following points: on the one hand the
Marker, with his slate covered with chalk-marks, and on the other Hans
Sachs holding up the shoes covered with his chalk-marks, each intimating
to the other that the singing had been a failure. To this picture, by way of
concluding the second act, I added a scene consisting of a narrow, crooked
little street in Nuremberg, with the people all running about in great
excitement, and ultimately engaging in a street brawl. Thus, suddenly, the
whole of my Meistersinger comedy took shape so vividly before me, that,
inasmuch as it was a particularly cheerful subject, and not in the least likely
to over-excite my nerves, I felt I must write it out in spite of the doctor’s
orders. I therefore proceeded to do this, and hoped it might free me from the
thrall of the idea of Lohengrin; but I was mistaken; for no sooner had I got
into my bath at noon, than I felt an overpowering desire to write out
Lohengrin, and this longing so overcame me that I could not wait the
prescribed hour for the bath, but when a few minutes elapsed, jumped out
and, barely giving myself time to dress, ran home to write out what I had in
overcoming my desire to give up the rest I had been prescribed while
partaking of the water of Marienbad.
The result was an ever-increasing state of excitement. Lohengrin, the first
conception of which dates from the end of my time in Paris, stood suddenly
revealed before me, complete in every detail of its dramatic construction.
The legend of the swan which forms such an important feature of all the
many versions of this series of myths that my studies had brought to my
notice, exercised a singular fascination over my imagination.
Remembering the doctor’s advice, I struggled bravely against the
temptation of writing down my ideas, and resorted to the most strange and
energetic methods. Owing to some comments I had read in Gervinus’s
History of German Literature, both the Meistersinger von Nurnberg and
Hans Sachs had acquired quite a vital charm for me. The Marker alone, and
the part he takes in the Master-singing, were particularly pleasing to me,
and on one of my lonely walks, without knowing anything particular about
Hans Sachs and his poetic contemporaries, I thought out a humorous scene,
in which the cobbler—as a popular artisan-poet—with the hammer on his
last, gives the Marker a practical lesson by making him sing, thereby taking
revenge on him for his conventional misdeeds. To me the force of the whole
scene was concentrated in the two following points: on the one hand the
Marker, with his slate covered with chalk-marks, and on the other Hans
Sachs holding up the shoes covered with his chalk-marks, each intimating
to the other that the singing had been a failure. To this picture, by way of
concluding the second act, I added a scene consisting of a narrow, crooked
little street in Nuremberg, with the people all running about in great
excitement, and ultimately engaging in a street brawl. Thus, suddenly, the
whole of my Meistersinger comedy took shape so vividly before me, that,
inasmuch as it was a particularly cheerful subject, and not in the least likely
to over-excite my nerves, I felt I must write it out in spite of the doctor’s
orders. I therefore proceeded to do this, and hoped it might free me from the
thrall of the idea of Lohengrin; but I was mistaken; for no sooner had I got
into my bath at noon, than I felt an overpowering desire to write out
Lohengrin, and this longing so overcame me that I could not wait the
prescribed hour for the bath, but when a few minutes elapsed, jumped out
and, barely giving myself time to dress, ran home to write out what I had in
Page 336
my mind. I repeated this for several days until the complete sketch of
Lohengrin was on paper.
The doctor then told me I had better give up taking the waters and baths,
saying emphatically that I was quite unfit for such cures. My excitement
had grown to such an extent that even my efforts to sleep as a rule ended
only in nocturnal adventures. Among some interesting excursions that we
made at this time, one to Eger fascinated me particularly, on account of its
association with Wallenstein and of the peculiar costumes of the inhabitants.
In mid-August we travelled back to Dresden, where my friends were glad
to see me in such good spirits; as for myself, I felt as if I had wings. In
September, when all our singers had returned from their summer holidays, I
resumed the rehearsals of Tannhäuser with great earnestness. We had now
got so far, at least with the musical part of the performance, that the
possible date of the production seemed quite close at hand. Schroder-
Devrient was one of the first to realise the extraordinary difficulties which
the production of Tannhäuser would entail. And, indeed, she saw these
difficulties so clearly that, to my great discomfiture, she was able to lay
them all before me. Once, when I called upon her, she read the principal
passages aloud with great feeling and force, and then she asked me how I
could have been so simple-minded as to have thought that so childish a
creature as Tichatschek would be able to find the proper tones for
Tannhäuser. I tried to bring her attention and my own to bear upon the
nature of the music, which was written so clearly in order to bring out the
necessary accent, that, in my opinion, the music actually spoke for him who
interpreted the passage, even if he were only a musical singer and nothing
more. She shook her head, saying that this would be all right in the case of
an oratorio.
Lohengrin was on paper.
The doctor then told me I had better give up taking the waters and baths,
saying emphatically that I was quite unfit for such cures. My excitement
had grown to such an extent that even my efforts to sleep as a rule ended
only in nocturnal adventures. Among some interesting excursions that we
made at this time, one to Eger fascinated me particularly, on account of its
association with Wallenstein and of the peculiar costumes of the inhabitants.
In mid-August we travelled back to Dresden, where my friends were glad
to see me in such good spirits; as for myself, I felt as if I had wings. In
September, when all our singers had returned from their summer holidays, I
resumed the rehearsals of Tannhäuser with great earnestness. We had now
got so far, at least with the musical part of the performance, that the
possible date of the production seemed quite close at hand. Schroder-
Devrient was one of the first to realise the extraordinary difficulties which
the production of Tannhäuser would entail. And, indeed, she saw these
difficulties so clearly that, to my great discomfiture, she was able to lay
them all before me. Once, when I called upon her, she read the principal
passages aloud with great feeling and force, and then she asked me how I
could have been so simple-minded as to have thought that so childish a
creature as Tichatschek would be able to find the proper tones for
Tannhäuser. I tried to bring her attention and my own to bear upon the
nature of the music, which was written so clearly in order to bring out the
necessary accent, that, in my opinion, the music actually spoke for him who
interpreted the passage, even if he were only a musical singer and nothing
more. She shook her head, saying that this would be all right in the case of
an oratorio.
Page 337
She now sang Elizabeth’s prayer from the piano score, and asked me if I
really thought that this music would answer my intentions if sung by a
young and pretty voice without any soul or without that experience of life
which alone could give the real expression to the interpretation. I sighed
and said that, in that case, the youthfulness of the voice and of its owner
must make up for what was lacking: at the same time, I asked her as a
favour to see what she could do towards making my niece, Johanna,
understand her part. All this, however, did not solve the Tannhäuser
problem, for any effort at teaching Tichatschek would only have resulted in
confusion. I was therefore obliged to rely entirely upon the energy of his
voice, and on the singer’s peculiarly sharp ‘speaking’ tone.
Devrient’s anxiety about the principal parts arose partly out of concern
about her own. She did not know what to do with the part of Venus; she had
undertaken it for the sake of the success of the performance, for although a
small part, so much depended upon its being ideally interpreted! Later on,
when the work was given in Paris, I became convinced that this part had
been written in too sketchy a style, and this induced me to reconstruct it by
making extensive additions, and by supplying all that which I felt it lacked.
For the moment, however, it looked as if no art on the part of the singer
could give to this sketch anything of what it ought to represent. The only
thing that might have helped towards a satisfactory impersonation of Venus
would have been the artist’s confidence in her own great physical attraction,
and in the effect it would help to produce by appealing to the purely
material sympathies of the public. The certainty that these means were no
longer at her disposal paralysed this great singer, who could hide her age
and matronly appearance no longer. She therefore became self-conscious,
and unable to use even the usual means for gaining an effect. On one
occasion, with a little smile of despair, she expressed herself incapable of
playing Venus, for the very simple reason that she could not appear dressed
like the goddess. ‘What on earth am I to wear as Venus?’ she exclaimed.
‘After all, I cannot be clad in a belt alone. A nice figure of fun I should
look, and you would laugh on the wrong side of your face!’
really thought that this music would answer my intentions if sung by a
young and pretty voice without any soul or without that experience of life
which alone could give the real expression to the interpretation. I sighed
and said that, in that case, the youthfulness of the voice and of its owner
must make up for what was lacking: at the same time, I asked her as a
favour to see what she could do towards making my niece, Johanna,
understand her part. All this, however, did not solve the Tannhäuser
problem, for any effort at teaching Tichatschek would only have resulted in
confusion. I was therefore obliged to rely entirely upon the energy of his
voice, and on the singer’s peculiarly sharp ‘speaking’ tone.
Devrient’s anxiety about the principal parts arose partly out of concern
about her own. She did not know what to do with the part of Venus; she had
undertaken it for the sake of the success of the performance, for although a
small part, so much depended upon its being ideally interpreted! Later on,
when the work was given in Paris, I became convinced that this part had
been written in too sketchy a style, and this induced me to reconstruct it by
making extensive additions, and by supplying all that which I felt it lacked.
For the moment, however, it looked as if no art on the part of the singer
could give to this sketch anything of what it ought to represent. The only
thing that might have helped towards a satisfactory impersonation of Venus
would have been the artist’s confidence in her own great physical attraction,
and in the effect it would help to produce by appealing to the purely
material sympathies of the public. The certainty that these means were no
longer at her disposal paralysed this great singer, who could hide her age
and matronly appearance no longer. She therefore became self-conscious,
and unable to use even the usual means for gaining an effect. On one
occasion, with a little smile of despair, she expressed herself incapable of
playing Venus, for the very simple reason that she could not appear dressed
like the goddess. ‘What on earth am I to wear as Venus?’ she exclaimed.
‘After all, I cannot be clad in a belt alone. A nice figure of fun I should
look, and you would laugh on the wrong side of your face!’
Page 338
On the whole, I still built my hopes upon the general effect of the music
alone, the great promise of which at the rehearsals greatly encouraged me.
Hiller, who had looked through the score and had already praised it, assured
me that the instrumentation could not have been carried out with greater
sobriety. The characteristic and delicate sonority of the orchestra delighted
me, and strengthened me in my resolve to be extremely sparing in the use of
my orchestral material, in order to attain that abundance of combinations
which I needed for my later works.
At the rehearsal my wife alone missed the trumpets and trombones that
gave such brightness and freshness to Rienzi. Although I laughed at this, I
could not help feeling anxious when she confided to me how great had been
her disappointment when, at the theatre rehearsal, she noticed the really
feeble impression made by the music of the Sangerkrieg. Speaking from the
point of view of the public, who always want to be amused or stirred in
some way or other, she had thus very rightly called attention to an
exceedingly questionable side of the performance. But I saw at once that the
fault lay less with the conception than with the fact that I had not controlled
the production with sufficient care.
In regard to the conception of this scene I was literally on the horns of a
dilemma, for I had to decide once for all whether this Sangerkrieg was to be
a concert of arias or a competition in dramatic poetry. There are many
people even nowadays, who, in spite of having witnessed a perfectly
successful production of this scene, have not received the right impression
of its purport. Their idea is that it belongs to the traditional operatic ‘genre,’
which demands that a number of vocal evolutions shall be juxtaposed or
contrasted, and that these different songs are intended to amuse and interest
the audience by means of their purely musical changes in rhythm and time
on the principle of a concert programme, i.e. by various items of different
styles. This was not at all my idea: my real intention was, if possible, to
force the listener, for the first time in the history of opera, to take an interest
in a poetical idea, by making him follow all its necessary developments. For
it was only by virtue of this interest that he could be made to understand the
catastrophe, which in this instance was not to be brought about by any
outside influence, but must be the outcome simply of the natural spiritual
processes at work. Hence the need of great moderation and breadth in the
conception of the music; first, in order that according to my principle it
might prove helpful rather than the reverse to the understanding of the
alone, the great promise of which at the rehearsals greatly encouraged me.
Hiller, who had looked through the score and had already praised it, assured
me that the instrumentation could not have been carried out with greater
sobriety. The characteristic and delicate sonority of the orchestra delighted
me, and strengthened me in my resolve to be extremely sparing in the use of
my orchestral material, in order to attain that abundance of combinations
which I needed for my later works.
At the rehearsal my wife alone missed the trumpets and trombones that
gave such brightness and freshness to Rienzi. Although I laughed at this, I
could not help feeling anxious when she confided to me how great had been
her disappointment when, at the theatre rehearsal, she noticed the really
feeble impression made by the music of the Sangerkrieg. Speaking from the
point of view of the public, who always want to be amused or stirred in
some way or other, she had thus very rightly called attention to an
exceedingly questionable side of the performance. But I saw at once that the
fault lay less with the conception than with the fact that I had not controlled
the production with sufficient care.
In regard to the conception of this scene I was literally on the horns of a
dilemma, for I had to decide once for all whether this Sangerkrieg was to be
a concert of arias or a competition in dramatic poetry. There are many
people even nowadays, who, in spite of having witnessed a perfectly
successful production of this scene, have not received the right impression
of its purport. Their idea is that it belongs to the traditional operatic ‘genre,’
which demands that a number of vocal evolutions shall be juxtaposed or
contrasted, and that these different songs are intended to amuse and interest
the audience by means of their purely musical changes in rhythm and time
on the principle of a concert programme, i.e. by various items of different
styles. This was not at all my idea: my real intention was, if possible, to
force the listener, for the first time in the history of opera, to take an interest
in a poetical idea, by making him follow all its necessary developments. For
it was only by virtue of this interest that he could be made to understand the
catastrophe, which in this instance was not to be brought about by any
outside influence, but must be the outcome simply of the natural spiritual
processes at work. Hence the need of great moderation and breadth in the
conception of the music; first, in order that according to my principle it
might prove helpful rather than the reverse to the understanding of the
Page 339
poetical lines, and secondly, in order that the increasing rhythmic character
of the melody which marks the ardent growth of passion may not be
interrupted too arbitrarily by unnecessary changes in modulation and
rhythm. Hence, too, the need of a very sparing use of orchestral instruments
for the accompaniment, and an intentional suppression of all those purely
musical effects which must be utilised, and that gradually, only when the
situation becomes so intense that one almost ceases to think, and can only
feel the tragic nature of the crisis. No one could deny that I had contrived to
produce the proper effect of this principle the moment I played the
Sangerkrieg on the piano. With the view of ensuring all my future
successes, I was now confronted with the exceptional difficulty of making
the opera singers understand how to interpret their parts precisely in the
way I desired. I remembered how, through lack of experience, I had
neglected properly to superintend the production of the Fliegender
Holländer, and as I now fully realised all the disastrous consequences of this
neglect, I began to think of means by which I could teach the singers my
own interpretation. I have already stated that it was impossible to influence
Tichatschek, for if he were made to do things he could not understand, he
only became nervous and confused. He was conscious of his advantages.
He knew that with his metallic voice he could sing with great musical
rhythm and accuracy, while his delivery was simply perfect. But, to my
great astonishment, I was soon to learn that all this did not by any means
suffice; for, to my horror, at the first performance, that which had strangely
escaped my notice in the rehearsals became suddenly apparent to me. At the
close of the Sangerkrieg, when Tannhäuser (in frantic excitement, and
forgetful of everybody present) has to sing his praise to Venus, and I saw
Tichatschek moving towards Elizabeth and addressing his passionate
outburst to her, I thought of Schroder-Devrient’s warning in very much the
same way as Croesus must have thought when he cried, ‘O Solon! Solon!’
at the funeral pyre. In spite of the musical excellence of Tichatschek, the
enormous life and melodic charm of the Sangerkrieg failed entirely.
On the other hand, I succeeded in calling into life an entirely new
element such as probably had never been seen in opera! I had watched the
young baritone Mitterwurzer with great interest in some of his parts—he
was a strangely reticent man, and not at all sociably inclined, and I had
noticed that his delightfully mellow voice possessed the rare quality of
bringing out the inner note of the soul. To him I entrusted Wolfram, and I
of the melody which marks the ardent growth of passion may not be
interrupted too arbitrarily by unnecessary changes in modulation and
rhythm. Hence, too, the need of a very sparing use of orchestral instruments
for the accompaniment, and an intentional suppression of all those purely
musical effects which must be utilised, and that gradually, only when the
situation becomes so intense that one almost ceases to think, and can only
feel the tragic nature of the crisis. No one could deny that I had contrived to
produce the proper effect of this principle the moment I played the
Sangerkrieg on the piano. With the view of ensuring all my future
successes, I was now confronted with the exceptional difficulty of making
the opera singers understand how to interpret their parts precisely in the
way I desired. I remembered how, through lack of experience, I had
neglected properly to superintend the production of the Fliegender
Holländer, and as I now fully realised all the disastrous consequences of this
neglect, I began to think of means by which I could teach the singers my
own interpretation. I have already stated that it was impossible to influence
Tichatschek, for if he were made to do things he could not understand, he
only became nervous and confused. He was conscious of his advantages.
He knew that with his metallic voice he could sing with great musical
rhythm and accuracy, while his delivery was simply perfect. But, to my
great astonishment, I was soon to learn that all this did not by any means
suffice; for, to my horror, at the first performance, that which had strangely
escaped my notice in the rehearsals became suddenly apparent to me. At the
close of the Sangerkrieg, when Tannhäuser (in frantic excitement, and
forgetful of everybody present) has to sing his praise to Venus, and I saw
Tichatschek moving towards Elizabeth and addressing his passionate
outburst to her, I thought of Schroder-Devrient’s warning in very much the
same way as Croesus must have thought when he cried, ‘O Solon! Solon!’
at the funeral pyre. In spite of the musical excellence of Tichatschek, the
enormous life and melodic charm of the Sangerkrieg failed entirely.
On the other hand, I succeeded in calling into life an entirely new
element such as probably had never been seen in opera! I had watched the
young baritone Mitterwurzer with great interest in some of his parts—he
was a strangely reticent man, and not at all sociably inclined, and I had
noticed that his delightfully mellow voice possessed the rare quality of
bringing out the inner note of the soul. To him I entrusted Wolfram, and I
Page 340
had every reason to be satisfied with his zeal and with the success of his
studies. Therefore, if I wished my intention and method to become known,
especially in regard to this difficult Sangerkrieg, I had to rely on him for the
proper execution of my plans and everything they involved. I began by
going through the opening song of this scene with him; but, after I had done
my utmost to make him understand how I wanted it done, I was surprised to
find how very difficult this particular rendering of the music appeared to
him. He was absolutely incapable of repeating it after me, and with each
renewed effort his singing became so commonplace and so mechanical that
I realised clearly that he had not understood this piece to be anything more
than a phrase in recitative form, which he might render with any inflections
of the voice that happened to be prescribed, or which might be sung either
this way or that, according to fancy, as was usual in operatic pieces. He, too,
was astonished at his own want of capacity, but was so struck by the
novelty and the justice of my views, that he begged me not to try any more
for the present, but to leave him to find out for himself how best to become
familiar with this newly revealed world. During several rehearsals he only
sang in a whisper in order to get over the difficulty, but at the last rehearsal
he acquitted himself so admirably of his task, and threw himself into it so
heartily, that his work has remained to this day as my most conclusive
reason for believing that, in spite of the unsatisfactory state of the world of
opera to-day, it is possible not only to find, but also properly to train, the
singer whom I should regard as indispensable for a correct interpretation of
my works. It was through the impression made by Mitterwurzer that I
ultimately succeeded in making the public understand the whole of my
work. This man, who had utterly changed himself in bearing, look, and
appearance in order to fit himself to the role of Wolfram, had, in thus
solving the problem, not only become a thorough artist, but by his
interpretation of his part had also proved himself my saviour at the very
moment when my work was threatening to fail through the unsatisfactory
result of the first performance.
By his side the part of Elizabeth made a sweet impression. The youthful
appearance of my niece, her tall and slender form, the decidedly German
cast of her features, as well as the incomparable beauty of her voice, with
its expression of almost childlike innocence, helped her to gain the hearts of
the audience, even though her talent was more theatrical than dramatic. She
soon rose to fame by her impersonation of this part, and often in later years,
studies. Therefore, if I wished my intention and method to become known,
especially in regard to this difficult Sangerkrieg, I had to rely on him for the
proper execution of my plans and everything they involved. I began by
going through the opening song of this scene with him; but, after I had done
my utmost to make him understand how I wanted it done, I was surprised to
find how very difficult this particular rendering of the music appeared to
him. He was absolutely incapable of repeating it after me, and with each
renewed effort his singing became so commonplace and so mechanical that
I realised clearly that he had not understood this piece to be anything more
than a phrase in recitative form, which he might render with any inflections
of the voice that happened to be prescribed, or which might be sung either
this way or that, according to fancy, as was usual in operatic pieces. He, too,
was astonished at his own want of capacity, but was so struck by the
novelty and the justice of my views, that he begged me not to try any more
for the present, but to leave him to find out for himself how best to become
familiar with this newly revealed world. During several rehearsals he only
sang in a whisper in order to get over the difficulty, but at the last rehearsal
he acquitted himself so admirably of his task, and threw himself into it so
heartily, that his work has remained to this day as my most conclusive
reason for believing that, in spite of the unsatisfactory state of the world of
opera to-day, it is possible not only to find, but also properly to train, the
singer whom I should regard as indispensable for a correct interpretation of
my works. It was through the impression made by Mitterwurzer that I
ultimately succeeded in making the public understand the whole of my
work. This man, who had utterly changed himself in bearing, look, and
appearance in order to fit himself to the role of Wolfram, had, in thus
solving the problem, not only become a thorough artist, but by his
interpretation of his part had also proved himself my saviour at the very
moment when my work was threatening to fail through the unsatisfactory
result of the first performance.
By his side the part of Elizabeth made a sweet impression. The youthful
appearance of my niece, her tall and slender form, the decidedly German
cast of her features, as well as the incomparable beauty of her voice, with
its expression of almost childlike innocence, helped her to gain the hearts of
the audience, even though her talent was more theatrical than dramatic. She
soon rose to fame by her impersonation of this part, and often in later years,
Page 341
when speaking about Tannhäuser performances in which she had appeared,
people used to tell me that its success had been entirely due to her. Strange
to say, in such reports people referred principally to the charm of her acting
at the moment when she received the guests in the Wartburg Hall; and I
used to account for this by remembering the untiring efforts with which my
talented brother and I had trained her to perform this very part. And yet it
was never possible to make her understand the proper interpretation of the
prayer in the third act, and I felt inclined to say, ‘O Solon! Solon!’ as I had
done in the case of Tichatschek, when after the first performance I was
obliged to make a considerable cut in this solo, a proceeding which greatly
reduced its importance for ever afterwards. I heard later that Johanna, who
for a short period actually had the reputation of being a great singer, had
never succeeded in singing the prayer as it ought to be sung, whereas a
French singer, Mademoiselle Marie Sax, achieved this in Paris to my entire
satisfaction.
In the beginning of October we had so far progressed with our rehearsals
that nothing stood in the way of an immediate production of Tannhäuser
save the scenery, which was not yet complete. A few only of the scenes
ordered from Paris had arrived, and even these had come very late. The
Wartburg Valley was beautifully effective and perfect in every detail. The
inner part of the Venusberg, however, gave me much anxiety: the painter
had not understood me; he had painted clusters of trees and statues, which
reminded one of Versailles, and had placed them in a wild cave; he had
evidently not known how to combine the weird with the alluring. I had to
insist on extensive alterations, and chiefly on the painting out of the shrubs
and statues, all of which required time. The grotto had to lie half hidden in a
rosy cloud, through which the Wartburg Valley had to loom in the distance;
this was to be done in strict obedience to my own ideas.
The greatest misfortune, however, was to befall me in the shape of the
tardy delivery of the scenery for the Hall of Song. This was due to great
negligence on the part of the Paris artists; and we waited and waited until
every detail of the opera had been studied and studied again ad nauseam.
Daily I went to the railway station and examined all the packages and boxes
that had arrived, but there was no Hall of Song. At last I allowed myself to
be persuaded not to postpone the first performance any longer, and I
decided to use the Hall of Karl the Great out of Oberon, originally
suggested to me by Lüttichau, instead of the real thing. Considering the
people used to tell me that its success had been entirely due to her. Strange
to say, in such reports people referred principally to the charm of her acting
at the moment when she received the guests in the Wartburg Hall; and I
used to account for this by remembering the untiring efforts with which my
talented brother and I had trained her to perform this very part. And yet it
was never possible to make her understand the proper interpretation of the
prayer in the third act, and I felt inclined to say, ‘O Solon! Solon!’ as I had
done in the case of Tichatschek, when after the first performance I was
obliged to make a considerable cut in this solo, a proceeding which greatly
reduced its importance for ever afterwards. I heard later that Johanna, who
for a short period actually had the reputation of being a great singer, had
never succeeded in singing the prayer as it ought to be sung, whereas a
French singer, Mademoiselle Marie Sax, achieved this in Paris to my entire
satisfaction.
In the beginning of October we had so far progressed with our rehearsals
that nothing stood in the way of an immediate production of Tannhäuser
save the scenery, which was not yet complete. A few only of the scenes
ordered from Paris had arrived, and even these had come very late. The
Wartburg Valley was beautifully effective and perfect in every detail. The
inner part of the Venusberg, however, gave me much anxiety: the painter
had not understood me; he had painted clusters of trees and statues, which
reminded one of Versailles, and had placed them in a wild cave; he had
evidently not known how to combine the weird with the alluring. I had to
insist on extensive alterations, and chiefly on the painting out of the shrubs
and statues, all of which required time. The grotto had to lie half hidden in a
rosy cloud, through which the Wartburg Valley had to loom in the distance;
this was to be done in strict obedience to my own ideas.
The greatest misfortune, however, was to befall me in the shape of the
tardy delivery of the scenery for the Hall of Song. This was due to great
negligence on the part of the Paris artists; and we waited and waited until
every detail of the opera had been studied and studied again ad nauseam.
Daily I went to the railway station and examined all the packages and boxes
that had arrived, but there was no Hall of Song. At last I allowed myself to
be persuaded not to postpone the first performance any longer, and I
decided to use the Hall of Karl the Great out of Oberon, originally
suggested to me by Lüttichau, instead of the real thing. Considering the
Page 342
importance I attached to practical effect, this entailed a great sacrifice of my
personal feelings. And true enough, when the curtain rose for the second
act, the reappearance of this throne-room, which the public had seen so
often, added considerably to the general disappointment of the audience,
who had anticipated astonishing surprises in this opera.
On the 19th of October the first performance took place. In the morning
of that day a very beautiful young lady was introduced to me by the leader
Lipinsky. Her name was Mme. Ivalergis, and she was a niece of the Russian
Chancellor, Count von Nesselrode. Liszt had spoken to her about me with
such enthusiasm that she had travelled all the way to Dresden especially to
hear the first production of my new work. I thought I was right in regarding
this flattering visit as a good omen. But although on this occasion she
turned away from me, somewhat perplexed and disappointed by the very
unintelligible performance and the somewhat doubtful reception with which
it met, I had sufficient cause in after-years to know how deeply this
remarkable and energetic woman had nevertheless been impressed.
A great contrast to this visit was one I received from a peculiar man
called C. Gaillard. He was the editor of a Berlin musical paper, which had
only just started, and in which I had read with great astonishment an
entirely favourable and important criticism of my Fliegender Holländer.
Although necessity had compelled me to remain indifferent to the attitude
of the critics, yet this particular notice gave me much pleasure, and I had
invited my unknown critic to come and hear the first production of
Tannhäuser in Dresden.
This he did, and I was deeply touched to find that I had to deal with a
young man who, in spite of being threatened by consumption, and being
also exceedingly badly off, had come at my invitation, simply from a sense
of duty and honour, and not with any mercenary motive. I saw from his
knowledge and capacities that he would never be able to attain a position of
great influence, but his kindness of heart and his extraordinarily receptive
mind filled me with a feeling of profound respect for him. A few years later
I was very sorry to hear that he had at last succumbed to the terrible disease
from which I knew him to be suffering; for to the very end he remained
faithful and devoted to me, in spite of the most trying circumstances.
Meanwhile I had renewed my acquaintance with the friend I had won
through the production of the Fliegender Holländer in Berlin, and who for a
personal feelings. And true enough, when the curtain rose for the second
act, the reappearance of this throne-room, which the public had seen so
often, added considerably to the general disappointment of the audience,
who had anticipated astonishing surprises in this opera.
On the 19th of October the first performance took place. In the morning
of that day a very beautiful young lady was introduced to me by the leader
Lipinsky. Her name was Mme. Ivalergis, and she was a niece of the Russian
Chancellor, Count von Nesselrode. Liszt had spoken to her about me with
such enthusiasm that she had travelled all the way to Dresden especially to
hear the first production of my new work. I thought I was right in regarding
this flattering visit as a good omen. But although on this occasion she
turned away from me, somewhat perplexed and disappointed by the very
unintelligible performance and the somewhat doubtful reception with which
it met, I had sufficient cause in after-years to know how deeply this
remarkable and energetic woman had nevertheless been impressed.
A great contrast to this visit was one I received from a peculiar man
called C. Gaillard. He was the editor of a Berlin musical paper, which had
only just started, and in which I had read with great astonishment an
entirely favourable and important criticism of my Fliegender Holländer.
Although necessity had compelled me to remain indifferent to the attitude
of the critics, yet this particular notice gave me much pleasure, and I had
invited my unknown critic to come and hear the first production of
Tannhäuser in Dresden.
This he did, and I was deeply touched to find that I had to deal with a
young man who, in spite of being threatened by consumption, and being
also exceedingly badly off, had come at my invitation, simply from a sense
of duty and honour, and not with any mercenary motive. I saw from his
knowledge and capacities that he would never be able to attain a position of
great influence, but his kindness of heart and his extraordinarily receptive
mind filled me with a feeling of profound respect for him. A few years later
I was very sorry to hear that he had at last succumbed to the terrible disease
from which I knew him to be suffering; for to the very end he remained
faithful and devoted to me, in spite of the most trying circumstances.
Meanwhile I had renewed my acquaintance with the friend I had won
through the production of the Fliegender Holländer in Berlin, and who for a
Page 343
long time I had never had an opportunity of knowing more thoroughly. The
second time I met her was at Schroder-Devrient’s, with whom she was
already on friendly terms, and of whom she used to speak as ‘one of my
greatest conquests.’
She was already past her first youth, and had no beauty of feature except
remarkably penetrating and expressive eyes that showed the greatness of
soul with which she was gifted. She was the sister of Frommann, the
bookseller of Jena, and could relate many intimate facts about Goethe, who
had stayed at her brother’s house when he was in that town. She had held
the position of reader and companion to the Princess Augusta of Prussia,
and had thus become intimately acquainted with her, and was regarded by
her own association as almost a bosom friend and confidante of that great
lady. Nevertheless, she lived in extreme poverty, and seemed proud of being
able, by means of her talent as a painter of arabesques, to secure for herself
some sort of independence. She always remained faithfully devoted to me,
as she was one of the few who were uninfluenced by the unfavourable
impression produced by the first performance of Tannhäuser, and promptly
expressed her appreciation of my latest work with the greatest enthusiasm.
With regard to the production itself the conclusions I drew from it were
as follows: the real faults in the work, which I have already mentioned
incidentally, lay in the sketchy and clumsy portrayal of the part of Venus,
and consequently of the whole of the introductory scene of the first act. In
consequence of this defect the drama never even rose to the level of genuine
warmth, still less did it attain to the heights of passion which, according to
the poetic conception of the part, should so strongly work upon the feelings
of the audience as to prepare them for the inevitable catastrophe in which
the scene culminates, and thus lead up to the tragic denouement. This great
scene was a complete failure, in spite of the fact that it was entrusted to so
great an actress as Schroder-Devrient, and a singer so unusually gifted as
Tichatschek. The genius of Devrient might yet have struck the right note of
passion in the scene had she not chanced to be acting with a singer
incapable of all dramatic seriousness, and whose natural gifts only fitted
him for joyous or declamatory accents, and who was totally incapable of
expressing pain and suffering. It was not until Wolfram’s touching song and
the closing scene of this act were reached that the audience showed any
signs of emotion. Tichatschek wrought such a tremendous effect in the
concluding phrase by the jubilant music of his voice that, as I was
second time I met her was at Schroder-Devrient’s, with whom she was
already on friendly terms, and of whom she used to speak as ‘one of my
greatest conquests.’
She was already past her first youth, and had no beauty of feature except
remarkably penetrating and expressive eyes that showed the greatness of
soul with which she was gifted. She was the sister of Frommann, the
bookseller of Jena, and could relate many intimate facts about Goethe, who
had stayed at her brother’s house when he was in that town. She had held
the position of reader and companion to the Princess Augusta of Prussia,
and had thus become intimately acquainted with her, and was regarded by
her own association as almost a bosom friend and confidante of that great
lady. Nevertheless, she lived in extreme poverty, and seemed proud of being
able, by means of her talent as a painter of arabesques, to secure for herself
some sort of independence. She always remained faithfully devoted to me,
as she was one of the few who were uninfluenced by the unfavourable
impression produced by the first performance of Tannhäuser, and promptly
expressed her appreciation of my latest work with the greatest enthusiasm.
With regard to the production itself the conclusions I drew from it were
as follows: the real faults in the work, which I have already mentioned
incidentally, lay in the sketchy and clumsy portrayal of the part of Venus,
and consequently of the whole of the introductory scene of the first act. In
consequence of this defect the drama never even rose to the level of genuine
warmth, still less did it attain to the heights of passion which, according to
the poetic conception of the part, should so strongly work upon the feelings
of the audience as to prepare them for the inevitable catastrophe in which
the scene culminates, and thus lead up to the tragic denouement. This great
scene was a complete failure, in spite of the fact that it was entrusted to so
great an actress as Schroder-Devrient, and a singer so unusually gifted as
Tichatschek. The genius of Devrient might yet have struck the right note of
passion in the scene had she not chanced to be acting with a singer
incapable of all dramatic seriousness, and whose natural gifts only fitted
him for joyous or declamatory accents, and who was totally incapable of
expressing pain and suffering. It was not until Wolfram’s touching song and
the closing scene of this act were reached that the audience showed any
signs of emotion. Tichatschek wrought such a tremendous effect in the
concluding phrase by the jubilant music of his voice that, as I was
Page 344
afterwards informed, the end of this first act left the audience in a great state
of enthusiasm. This was maintained, and even exceeded in the second act,
during which Elizabeth and Wolfram made a very sympathetic impression.
It was only the hero of Tannhäuser who continued to lose ground, and at
last so completely failed to hold the audience that in the final scene he
almost broke down himself in dejection, as though the failure of Tannhäuser
were his own. The fatal defect of his performance lay in his inability to find
the right expression for the theme of the great Adagio passage of the finale
beginning with the words: ‘To lead the sinner to salvation, the Heaven-sent
messenger drew near.’ The importance of this passage I have explained at
length in my subsequent instructions for the production of Tannhäuser.
Indeed, owing to Tichatschek’s absolutely expressionless rendering, which
made it seem terribly long and tedious, I had to omit it entirely from the
second performance. As I did not wish to offend so devoted and, in his way,
so deserving a man as Tichatschek, I let it be understood I had come to the
conclusion that this theme was a failure. Moreover, as Tichatschek was
thought to be an actor chosen by myself to take the parts of the heroes in
my works, this passage, which was so immeasurably vital to the opera,
continued to be omitted in all the subsequent productions of Tannhäuser, as
though this proceeding had been approved and demanded by me. I therefore
cherished no illusions about the value of the subsequent universal success
of this opera on the German stage. My hero, who, in rapture as in woe,
should always have asserted his feelings with boundless energy, slunk away
at the end of the second act with the humble bearing of a penitent sinner,
only to reappear in the third with a demeanour designed to awaken the
charitable sympathy of the audience. His pronunciation of the Pope’s
excommunication, however, was rendered with his usual full rhetorical
power, and it was refreshing to hear his voice dominating the accompanying
trombones. Granted that this radical defect in the hero’s acting had left the
public in a doubtful and unsatisfied state of suspense regarding the meaning
of the whole, yet the mistake in the execution of the final scene, arising
from my own inexperience in this new field of dramatic creation,
undoubtedly contributed to produce a chilling uncertainty as to the true
significance of the scenic action. In my first complete version I had made
Venus, on the occasion of her second attempt to recall her faithless lover,
appear in a vision to Tannhäuser when he is in a frenzy of madness, and the
awfulness of the situation, is merely suggested by a faint roseate glow upon
of enthusiasm. This was maintained, and even exceeded in the second act,
during which Elizabeth and Wolfram made a very sympathetic impression.
It was only the hero of Tannhäuser who continued to lose ground, and at
last so completely failed to hold the audience that in the final scene he
almost broke down himself in dejection, as though the failure of Tannhäuser
were his own. The fatal defect of his performance lay in his inability to find
the right expression for the theme of the great Adagio passage of the finale
beginning with the words: ‘To lead the sinner to salvation, the Heaven-sent
messenger drew near.’ The importance of this passage I have explained at
length in my subsequent instructions for the production of Tannhäuser.
Indeed, owing to Tichatschek’s absolutely expressionless rendering, which
made it seem terribly long and tedious, I had to omit it entirely from the
second performance. As I did not wish to offend so devoted and, in his way,
so deserving a man as Tichatschek, I let it be understood I had come to the
conclusion that this theme was a failure. Moreover, as Tichatschek was
thought to be an actor chosen by myself to take the parts of the heroes in
my works, this passage, which was so immeasurably vital to the opera,
continued to be omitted in all the subsequent productions of Tannhäuser, as
though this proceeding had been approved and demanded by me. I therefore
cherished no illusions about the value of the subsequent universal success
of this opera on the German stage. My hero, who, in rapture as in woe,
should always have asserted his feelings with boundless energy, slunk away
at the end of the second act with the humble bearing of a penitent sinner,
only to reappear in the third with a demeanour designed to awaken the
charitable sympathy of the audience. His pronunciation of the Pope’s
excommunication, however, was rendered with his usual full rhetorical
power, and it was refreshing to hear his voice dominating the accompanying
trombones. Granted that this radical defect in the hero’s acting had left the
public in a doubtful and unsatisfied state of suspense regarding the meaning
of the whole, yet the mistake in the execution of the final scene, arising
from my own inexperience in this new field of dramatic creation,
undoubtedly contributed to produce a chilling uncertainty as to the true
significance of the scenic action. In my first complete version I had made
Venus, on the occasion of her second attempt to recall her faithless lover,
appear in a vision to Tannhäuser when he is in a frenzy of madness, and the
awfulness of the situation, is merely suggested by a faint roseate glow upon
Page 345
the distant Horselberg. Even the definite announcement of Elizabeth’s death
was a sudden inspiration on the part of Wolfram. This idea I intended to
convey to the listening audience solely by the sound of bells tolling in the
distance, and by a faint gleam of torches to attract their eyes to the remote
Wartburg. Moreover, there was a lack of precision and clearness in the
appearance of the chorus of young pilgrims, whose duty it was to announce
the miracle by their song alone. At that time I had given them no budding
staves to carry, and had unfortunately spoiled their refrain by a tedious and
unbroken monotony of accompaniment.
When at last the curtain fell, I was under the impression, not so much
from the behaviour of the audience, which was friendly, as from my own
inward conviction, that the failure of this work was to be attributed to the
immature and unsuitable material used in its production. My depression was
extreme, and a few friends who were present after the piece, among them
my dear sister Clara and her husband, were equally affected. That very
evening I decided to remedy the defects of the first night before the second
performance. I was conscious of where the principal fault lay, but hardly
dared give expression to my conviction. At the slightest attempt on my part
to explain anything to Tichatschek I had to abandon it, as I realised the
impossibility of success, I should only have made him so embarrassed and
annoyed, that on one pretext or another he would never have sung
Tannhäuser again. In order to ensure the repetition of my opera, therefore, I
took the only course open to me by arrogating to myself all blame for the
failure. I could thus make considerable curtailments, whereby, of course, the
dramatic significance of the leading role was considerably lessened; this,
however, did not interfere with the other parts of the opera, which had been
favourably received. Consequently, although inwardly very humiliated, I
hoped to gain some advantage for my work at the second performance, and
was particularly desirous that this should take place with as little delay as
possible. But Tichatschek was hoarse, and I had to possess my soul in
patience for fully a week.
I can hardly describe what I suffered during that time; it seemed as if this
delay would completely ruin my work. Every day that elapsed between the
first and second performance left the result of the former more and more
problematic, until at last it appeared to be a generally acknowledged failure.
While the public as a whole expressed angry astonishment that, after the
approval they had shown of my Rienzi, I had paid no attention to their taste
was a sudden inspiration on the part of Wolfram. This idea I intended to
convey to the listening audience solely by the sound of bells tolling in the
distance, and by a faint gleam of torches to attract their eyes to the remote
Wartburg. Moreover, there was a lack of precision and clearness in the
appearance of the chorus of young pilgrims, whose duty it was to announce
the miracle by their song alone. At that time I had given them no budding
staves to carry, and had unfortunately spoiled their refrain by a tedious and
unbroken monotony of accompaniment.
When at last the curtain fell, I was under the impression, not so much
from the behaviour of the audience, which was friendly, as from my own
inward conviction, that the failure of this work was to be attributed to the
immature and unsuitable material used in its production. My depression was
extreme, and a few friends who were present after the piece, among them
my dear sister Clara and her husband, were equally affected. That very
evening I decided to remedy the defects of the first night before the second
performance. I was conscious of where the principal fault lay, but hardly
dared give expression to my conviction. At the slightest attempt on my part
to explain anything to Tichatschek I had to abandon it, as I realised the
impossibility of success, I should only have made him so embarrassed and
annoyed, that on one pretext or another he would never have sung
Tannhäuser again. In order to ensure the repetition of my opera, therefore, I
took the only course open to me by arrogating to myself all blame for the
failure. I could thus make considerable curtailments, whereby, of course, the
dramatic significance of the leading role was considerably lessened; this,
however, did not interfere with the other parts of the opera, which had been
favourably received. Consequently, although inwardly very humiliated, I
hoped to gain some advantage for my work at the second performance, and
was particularly desirous that this should take place with as little delay as
possible. But Tichatschek was hoarse, and I had to possess my soul in
patience for fully a week.
I can hardly describe what I suffered during that time; it seemed as if this
delay would completely ruin my work. Every day that elapsed between the
first and second performance left the result of the former more and more
problematic, until at last it appeared to be a generally acknowledged failure.
While the public as a whole expressed angry astonishment that, after the
approval they had shown of my Rienzi, I had paid no attention to their taste
Page 346
in writing my new work, there were may kind and judicious friends who
were utterly perplexed at its inefficiency, the principal parts of which they
had been unable to understand, or thought were imperfectly sketched and
finished. The critics, with unconcealed joy, attacked it as ravens attack
carrion thrown out to them. Even the passions and prejudices of the day
were drawn into the controversy in order, if possible, to confuse men’s
minds, and prejudice them against me. It was just at the time when the
German-Catholic agitation, set in motion by Czersky and Ronge as a highly
meritorious and liberal movement, was causing a great commotion. It was
now made out that by Tannhäuser I had provoked a reactionary tendency,
and that precisely as Meyerbeer with his Huguenots had glorified
Protestantism, so I with my latest opera would glorify Catholicism.
The rumour that in writing Tannhäuser I had been bribed by the Catholic
part was believed for a long time. While the effort was being made to ruin
my popularity by this means, I had the questionable honour of being
approached, first by letter, afterwards in person, by a certain M. Rousseau,
at that time editor of the Prussian Staatszeitung, who wished for my
friendship and help. I knew of him only in connection with a scathing
criticism of my Fliegender Holländer. He informed me that he had been sent
from Austria to further the Catholic cause in Berlin, but that he had had so
many sad experiences of the fruitlessness of his efforts, that he was now
returning to Vienna to continue his work in this direction undisturbed, with
which work I had, by my Tannhäuser, proclaimed myself fully in accord.
That remarkable paper, the Dresdener Anzeiger, which was a local organ
for the redress of slander and scandal, daily published some fresh bit of
news to my prejudice. At last I noticed that these attacks were met by witty
and forcible little snubs, and also that encouraging comments appeared in
my favour, which for some time surprised me very much, as I knew that
only enemies and never friends interested themselves in such cases. But I
learned, to my amusement, from Röckel, that he and my friend Heine had
carried out this inspiriting campaign on my behalf.
The ill-feeling against me in this quarter was only troublesome because at
that unfortunate period I was hindered from expressing myself through my
work. Tichatschek continued hoarse, and it was said he would never sing in
my opera again. I heard from Lüttichau that, scared by the failure of
Tannhäuser, he was holding himself in readiness to countermand the order
were utterly perplexed at its inefficiency, the principal parts of which they
had been unable to understand, or thought were imperfectly sketched and
finished. The critics, with unconcealed joy, attacked it as ravens attack
carrion thrown out to them. Even the passions and prejudices of the day
were drawn into the controversy in order, if possible, to confuse men’s
minds, and prejudice them against me. It was just at the time when the
German-Catholic agitation, set in motion by Czersky and Ronge as a highly
meritorious and liberal movement, was causing a great commotion. It was
now made out that by Tannhäuser I had provoked a reactionary tendency,
and that precisely as Meyerbeer with his Huguenots had glorified
Protestantism, so I with my latest opera would glorify Catholicism.
The rumour that in writing Tannhäuser I had been bribed by the Catholic
part was believed for a long time. While the effort was being made to ruin
my popularity by this means, I had the questionable honour of being
approached, first by letter, afterwards in person, by a certain M. Rousseau,
at that time editor of the Prussian Staatszeitung, who wished for my
friendship and help. I knew of him only in connection with a scathing
criticism of my Fliegender Holländer. He informed me that he had been sent
from Austria to further the Catholic cause in Berlin, but that he had had so
many sad experiences of the fruitlessness of his efforts, that he was now
returning to Vienna to continue his work in this direction undisturbed, with
which work I had, by my Tannhäuser, proclaimed myself fully in accord.
That remarkable paper, the Dresdener Anzeiger, which was a local organ
for the redress of slander and scandal, daily published some fresh bit of
news to my prejudice. At last I noticed that these attacks were met by witty
and forcible little snubs, and also that encouraging comments appeared in
my favour, which for some time surprised me very much, as I knew that
only enemies and never friends interested themselves in such cases. But I
learned, to my amusement, from Röckel, that he and my friend Heine had
carried out this inspiriting campaign on my behalf.
The ill-feeling against me in this quarter was only troublesome because at
that unfortunate period I was hindered from expressing myself through my
work. Tichatschek continued hoarse, and it was said he would never sing in
my opera again. I heard from Lüttichau that, scared by the failure of
Tannhäuser, he was holding himself in readiness to countermand the order
Page 347
for the promised scenery for the Hall of Song, or to cancel it altogether. I
was so terrified at the cowardice which was thus revealed, that I myself
began to look upon Tannhäuser as doomed. My prospects and my whole
position, when viewed in this mood, may be readily gathered from my
communications, especially those referring to my negotiations for the
publication of my works.
This terrible week dragged out like an endless eternity. I was afraid to
look anybody in the face, but was one day obliged to go to Meser’s music
shop, where I met Gottfried Semper just buying a text-book of Tannhäuser.
Only a short time before I had been very much put out in discussing this
subject with him; he would listen to nothing I had to say about the
Minnesangers and Pilgrims of the Middle Ages in connection with art, but
gave me to understand that he despised me for my choice of such material.
While Meser assured me that no inquiry whatever had been received for
the numbers of Tannhäuser already published, it was strange that my most
energetic antagonist should be the only person who had actually bought and
paid for a copy. In a peculiarly earnest and impressive manner he remarked
to me that it was necessary to be thoroughly acquainted with the subject if a
just opinion was to be passed on it, and that for this purpose, unfortunately,
nothing but the text was available. This very meeting with Semper, strange
as it may appear, was the first really encouraging sign that I can remember.
But I found my greatest consolation in those days of trouble and anxiety
in Röckel, who from that time forward entered into a lifelong intimacy with
me. He had, without my being aware of it, disputed, explained, quarrelled,
and petitioned on my behalf, and thereby roused himself to a veritable
enthusiasm for Tannhäuser. The evening before the second performance,
which was at last to take place, we met over a glass of beer, and his bright
demeanour had such a cheering effect upon me that we became very lively.
After contemplating my head for some time, he swore that it was
impossible to destroy me, that there was a something in me, something,
probably, in my blood, as similar characteristics also appeared in my
brother Albert, who was otherwise so unlike me. To speak more plainly, he
called it the peculiar HEAT of my temperament; this heat, he thought, might
consume others, whereas I appeared to feel at my best when it glowed most
fiercely, for he had several times seen me positively ablaze. I laughed, and
did not know what to make of his nonsense. Well, he said, I should soon see
was so terrified at the cowardice which was thus revealed, that I myself
began to look upon Tannhäuser as doomed. My prospects and my whole
position, when viewed in this mood, may be readily gathered from my
communications, especially those referring to my negotiations for the
publication of my works.
This terrible week dragged out like an endless eternity. I was afraid to
look anybody in the face, but was one day obliged to go to Meser’s music
shop, where I met Gottfried Semper just buying a text-book of Tannhäuser.
Only a short time before I had been very much put out in discussing this
subject with him; he would listen to nothing I had to say about the
Minnesangers and Pilgrims of the Middle Ages in connection with art, but
gave me to understand that he despised me for my choice of such material.
While Meser assured me that no inquiry whatever had been received for
the numbers of Tannhäuser already published, it was strange that my most
energetic antagonist should be the only person who had actually bought and
paid for a copy. In a peculiarly earnest and impressive manner he remarked
to me that it was necessary to be thoroughly acquainted with the subject if a
just opinion was to be passed on it, and that for this purpose, unfortunately,
nothing but the text was available. This very meeting with Semper, strange
as it may appear, was the first really encouraging sign that I can remember.
But I found my greatest consolation in those days of trouble and anxiety
in Röckel, who from that time forward entered into a lifelong intimacy with
me. He had, without my being aware of it, disputed, explained, quarrelled,
and petitioned on my behalf, and thereby roused himself to a veritable
enthusiasm for Tannhäuser. The evening before the second performance,
which was at last to take place, we met over a glass of beer, and his bright
demeanour had such a cheering effect upon me that we became very lively.
After contemplating my head for some time, he swore that it was
impossible to destroy me, that there was a something in me, something,
probably, in my blood, as similar characteristics also appeared in my
brother Albert, who was otherwise so unlike me. To speak more plainly, he
called it the peculiar HEAT of my temperament; this heat, he thought, might
consume others, whereas I appeared to feel at my best when it glowed most
fiercely, for he had several times seen me positively ablaze. I laughed, and
did not know what to make of his nonsense. Well, he said, I should soon see
Page 348
what he meant in Tannhäuser, for it was simply absurd to think the work
would not live; and he was absolutely certain of its success. I thought over
the matter on my way home, and came to the conclusion that if Tannhäuser
did indeed win its way, and become really popular, incalculable possibilities
might be attained.
At last the time arrived for our second performance. For this I thought I
had made due preparation by lessening the importance of the principal part,
and lowering my original ideals about some of the more important portions,
and I hoped by accentuating certain undoubtedly attractive passages to
secure a genuine appreciation of the whole. I was greatly delighted with the
scenery which had at last arrived for the Hall of Song in the second act, the
beautiful and imposing effect of which cheered us all, for we looked upon it
as a good omen. Unfortunately I had to bear the humiliation of seeing the
theatre nearly empty. This, more than anything else, sufficed to convince
me what the opinion of the public really was in regard to my work. But, if
the audience was scanty, the majority, at any rate, consisted of the first
friends of my art, and the reception of the piece was very cordial.
Mitterwurzer especially aroused the greatest enthusiasm. As for
Tichatschek, my anxious friends, Röckel and Heine, thought it necessary to
endeavour by every artifice to keep him in a good humour for his part. In
order to give practical assistance in making the undoubted obscurity of the
last scene clear, my friends had asked several young people, more
especially artists, to give vent to torrents of applause at those parts which
are not generally regarded by the opera-going public as provoking any
demonstration. Strange to say, the outburst of applause thus provoked after
the words, ‘An angel flies to God’s throne for thee, and will make his voice
heard; Heinrich, thou art saved,’ made the entire situation suddenly clear to
the public. At all subsequent productions this continued to be the principal
moment for the expression of sympathy on the part of the audience,
although it had passed quite unnoticed on the first night. A few days later a
third performance took place, but this time before a full house, Schroder-
Devrient, depressed at the small share she was able to take in the success of
my work, watched the progress of the opera from the small stage box; she
informed me that Lüttichau had come to her with a beaming face, saying he
thought we had now carried Tannhäuser happily through.
And this certainly proved to be the case; we often repeated it in the
course of the winter, but noticed that when two performances followed
would not live; and he was absolutely certain of its success. I thought over
the matter on my way home, and came to the conclusion that if Tannhäuser
did indeed win its way, and become really popular, incalculable possibilities
might be attained.
At last the time arrived for our second performance. For this I thought I
had made due preparation by lessening the importance of the principal part,
and lowering my original ideals about some of the more important portions,
and I hoped by accentuating certain undoubtedly attractive passages to
secure a genuine appreciation of the whole. I was greatly delighted with the
scenery which had at last arrived for the Hall of Song in the second act, the
beautiful and imposing effect of which cheered us all, for we looked upon it
as a good omen. Unfortunately I had to bear the humiliation of seeing the
theatre nearly empty. This, more than anything else, sufficed to convince
me what the opinion of the public really was in regard to my work. But, if
the audience was scanty, the majority, at any rate, consisted of the first
friends of my art, and the reception of the piece was very cordial.
Mitterwurzer especially aroused the greatest enthusiasm. As for
Tichatschek, my anxious friends, Röckel and Heine, thought it necessary to
endeavour by every artifice to keep him in a good humour for his part. In
order to give practical assistance in making the undoubted obscurity of the
last scene clear, my friends had asked several young people, more
especially artists, to give vent to torrents of applause at those parts which
are not generally regarded by the opera-going public as provoking any
demonstration. Strange to say, the outburst of applause thus provoked after
the words, ‘An angel flies to God’s throne for thee, and will make his voice
heard; Heinrich, thou art saved,’ made the entire situation suddenly clear to
the public. At all subsequent productions this continued to be the principal
moment for the expression of sympathy on the part of the audience,
although it had passed quite unnoticed on the first night. A few days later a
third performance took place, but this time before a full house, Schroder-
Devrient, depressed at the small share she was able to take in the success of
my work, watched the progress of the opera from the small stage box; she
informed me that Lüttichau had come to her with a beaming face, saying he
thought we had now carried Tannhäuser happily through.
And this certainly proved to be the case; we often repeated it in the
course of the winter, but noticed that when two performances followed
Page 349
close upon one another, there was not such a rush for the second, from
which we concluded that I had not yet gained the approval of the great
opera-going public, but only of the more cultured section of the community.
Among these real friends of Tannhäuser there were many, as I gradually
discovered, who as a rule never visited the theatre at all, and least of all the
opera. This interest on the part of a totally new public continued to grow in
intensity, and expressed itself in a delightful and hitherto unknown manner
by a strong sympathy for the author. It was particularly painful to me, on
Tichatschek’s account, to respond alone to the calls of the audience after
almost every act; however, I had at last to submit, as my refusal would only
have exposed the vocalist to fresh humiliations, for when he appeared on
the stage with his colleagues without me, the loud shouts for me were
almost insulting to him. With what genuine eagerness did I wish that the
contrary were the case, and that the excellence of the execution might
overshadow the author. The conviction that I should never attain this with
my Tannhäuser in Dresden guided me in all my future undertakings. But, at
all events, in producing Tannhäuser in this city I had succeeded in making
at least the cultured public acquainted with my peculiar tendencies, by
stimulating their mental faculties and stripping the performance of all
realistic accessories. I did not, however, succeed in making these tendencies
sufficiently clear in a dramatic performance, and in such an irresistible and
convincing manner as also to familiarise the uncultivated taste of the
ordinary public with them when they saw them embodied on the stage.
By enlarging the circle of my acquaintances, and making interesting
friends, I had a good opportunity during the winter of obtaining further
information on this point in a way that was both instructive and
encouraging. My acquaintance and close intimacy at this time with Dr.
Hermann Franck of Breslau, who had for some time been living quietly in
Dresden, was also very inspiring. He was very comfortably off, and was
one of those men who, by a wide knowledge and good judgment, combined
with considerable gifts as an author, won an excellent reputation for himself
in a large and select circle of private friends, without, however, making any
great name for himself with the public. He endeavoured to use his
knowledge and abilities for the general good, and was induced by
Brockhaus to edit the Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung when it first started.
This paper had been founded by Brockhaus some years earlier. However,
after editing it for a year, Franck resigned this post, and from that time
which we concluded that I had not yet gained the approval of the great
opera-going public, but only of the more cultured section of the community.
Among these real friends of Tannhäuser there were many, as I gradually
discovered, who as a rule never visited the theatre at all, and least of all the
opera. This interest on the part of a totally new public continued to grow in
intensity, and expressed itself in a delightful and hitherto unknown manner
by a strong sympathy for the author. It was particularly painful to me, on
Tichatschek’s account, to respond alone to the calls of the audience after
almost every act; however, I had at last to submit, as my refusal would only
have exposed the vocalist to fresh humiliations, for when he appeared on
the stage with his colleagues without me, the loud shouts for me were
almost insulting to him. With what genuine eagerness did I wish that the
contrary were the case, and that the excellence of the execution might
overshadow the author. The conviction that I should never attain this with
my Tannhäuser in Dresden guided me in all my future undertakings. But, at
all events, in producing Tannhäuser in this city I had succeeded in making
at least the cultured public acquainted with my peculiar tendencies, by
stimulating their mental faculties and stripping the performance of all
realistic accessories. I did not, however, succeed in making these tendencies
sufficiently clear in a dramatic performance, and in such an irresistible and
convincing manner as also to familiarise the uncultivated taste of the
ordinary public with them when they saw them embodied on the stage.
By enlarging the circle of my acquaintances, and making interesting
friends, I had a good opportunity during the winter of obtaining further
information on this point in a way that was both instructive and
encouraging. My acquaintance and close intimacy at this time with Dr.
Hermann Franck of Breslau, who had for some time been living quietly in
Dresden, was also very inspiring. He was very comfortably off, and was
one of those men who, by a wide knowledge and good judgment, combined
with considerable gifts as an author, won an excellent reputation for himself
in a large and select circle of private friends, without, however, making any
great name for himself with the public. He endeavoured to use his
knowledge and abilities for the general good, and was induced by
Brockhaus to edit the Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung when it first started.
This paper had been founded by Brockhaus some years earlier. However,
after editing it for a year, Franck resigned this post, and from that time
Page 350
forward it was only on the very rarest occasions that he could be persuaded
to touch anything connected with journalism. His curt and spirited remarks
about his experiences in connection with the Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung
justified his disinclination to engage in any work connected with the public
press. My appreciation was all the greater, therefore, when, without any
persuasion on my part, he wrote a full report on Tannhäuser for the
Augsburger Allgemeine Zeitung. This appeared in October or November,
1845, in a supplement to that paper, and although it contained the first
account of a work which has since been so widely discussed, I regard it,
after mature consideration, as the most far-reaching and exhaustive that has
ever been written. By this means my name figured for the first time in the
great European political paper, whose columns, in consequence of a
remarkable change of front which was to the interests of the proprietors,
have since been open to any one who wished to make merry at the expense
of me or my work.
The point which particularly attracted me in Dr. Franck was the delicate
and tactful art he displayed in his criticism and his methods of discussion.
There was something distinguished about them that was not so much the
outcome of rank and social position as of genuine world-wide culture.
The delicate coldness and reserve of his manner charmed rather than
repelled me, as it was a characteristic I had not met with hitherto. When I
found him expressing himself with some reserve in regard to persons who
enjoyed a reputation to which I did not think they were always entitled, I
was very pleased to see during my intercourse with him that in many ways I
exercised a decisive influence over his opinion. Even at that time I did not
care to let it pass unchallenged when people evaded the close analysis of the
work of this or that celebrity, by referring in terms of eulogy to his ‘good-
nature.’ I even cornered my worldly wise friend on this point, when a few
years later I had the satisfaction of getting from him a very concise
explanation of Meyerbeer’s ‘good-nature,’ of which he had once spoken,
and he recalled with a smile the extraordinary questions I had put to him at
the time. He was, however, quite alarmed when I gave him a very lucid
explanation of the disinterestedness and conspicuous altruism of
Mendelssohn in the service of art, of which he had spoken enthusiastically.
In a conversation about Mendelssohn he had remarked how delightful it
was to find a man able to make real sacrifices in order to free himself from
a false position that was of no service to art. It was assuredly a grand thing,
to touch anything connected with journalism. His curt and spirited remarks
about his experiences in connection with the Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung
justified his disinclination to engage in any work connected with the public
press. My appreciation was all the greater, therefore, when, without any
persuasion on my part, he wrote a full report on Tannhäuser for the
Augsburger Allgemeine Zeitung. This appeared in October or November,
1845, in a supplement to that paper, and although it contained the first
account of a work which has since been so widely discussed, I regard it,
after mature consideration, as the most far-reaching and exhaustive that has
ever been written. By this means my name figured for the first time in the
great European political paper, whose columns, in consequence of a
remarkable change of front which was to the interests of the proprietors,
have since been open to any one who wished to make merry at the expense
of me or my work.
The point which particularly attracted me in Dr. Franck was the delicate
and tactful art he displayed in his criticism and his methods of discussion.
There was something distinguished about them that was not so much the
outcome of rank and social position as of genuine world-wide culture.
The delicate coldness and reserve of his manner charmed rather than
repelled me, as it was a characteristic I had not met with hitherto. When I
found him expressing himself with some reserve in regard to persons who
enjoyed a reputation to which I did not think they were always entitled, I
was very pleased to see during my intercourse with him that in many ways I
exercised a decisive influence over his opinion. Even at that time I did not
care to let it pass unchallenged when people evaded the close analysis of the
work of this or that celebrity, by referring in terms of eulogy to his ‘good-
nature.’ I even cornered my worldly wise friend on this point, when a few
years later I had the satisfaction of getting from him a very concise
explanation of Meyerbeer’s ‘good-nature,’ of which he had once spoken,
and he recalled with a smile the extraordinary questions I had put to him at
the time. He was, however, quite alarmed when I gave him a very lucid
explanation of the disinterestedness and conspicuous altruism of
Mendelssohn in the service of art, of which he had spoken enthusiastically.
In a conversation about Mendelssohn he had remarked how delightful it
was to find a man able to make real sacrifices in order to free himself from
a false position that was of no service to art. It was assuredly a grand thing,
Page 351
he said, to have renounced a good salary of nine thousand marks as general
musical conductor in Berlin, and to have retired to Leipzig as a simple
conductor at the Gewandhaus concerts, and Mendelssohn was much to be
admired on that account. Just at that time I happened to be in a position to
give some correct details regarding this apparent sacrifice on the part of
Mendelssohn, because when I had made a serious proposal to our general
management about increasing the salaries of several of the poorer members
of the orchestra, Lüttichau was requested to inform me that, according to
the King’s latest commands, the expenditure on the state bands was to be so
restricted that for the present the poorer chamber musicians could not claim
any consideration, for Herr von Falkenstein, the governor of the Leipzig
district, who was a passionate admirer of Mendelssohn’s, had gone so far as
to influence the King to appoint the latter secret conductor, with a secret
salary of six thousand marks. This sum, together with the salary of three
thousand marks openly granted him by the management of the Leipzig
Gewandhaus, would amply compensate him for the position he had
renounced in Berlin, and he had consequently consented to migrate to
Leipzig. This large grant had, for decency’s sake, to be kept secret by the
board administering the band funds, not only because it was detrimental to
the interests of the institution, but also because it might give offence to
those who were acting as conductors at a lower salary, if they knew another
man had been appointed to a sinecure. From these circumstances
Mendelssohn derived not only the advantage of having the grant kept a
secret, but also the satisfaction of allowing his friends to applaud him as a
model of self-sacrificing zeal for going to Leipzig; which they could easily
do, although they knew him to be in a good financial position. When I
explained this to Franck, he was astonished, and admitted it was one of the
strangest cases he had ever come across in connection with undeserved
fame.
We soon arrived at a mutual understanding in our views about many
other artistic celebrities with whom we came in contact at that time in
Dresden. This was a simple matter in the case of Ferdinand Hiller, who was
regarded as the chief of the ‘good-natured’ ones. Regarding the more
famous painters of the so-called Dusseldorf School, whom I met frequently
through the medium of Tannhäuser, it was not quite so easy to come to a
conclusion, as I was to a great extent influenced by the fame attached to
their well-known names; but here again Franck startled me with opportune
musical conductor in Berlin, and to have retired to Leipzig as a simple
conductor at the Gewandhaus concerts, and Mendelssohn was much to be
admired on that account. Just at that time I happened to be in a position to
give some correct details regarding this apparent sacrifice on the part of
Mendelssohn, because when I had made a serious proposal to our general
management about increasing the salaries of several of the poorer members
of the orchestra, Lüttichau was requested to inform me that, according to
the King’s latest commands, the expenditure on the state bands was to be so
restricted that for the present the poorer chamber musicians could not claim
any consideration, for Herr von Falkenstein, the governor of the Leipzig
district, who was a passionate admirer of Mendelssohn’s, had gone so far as
to influence the King to appoint the latter secret conductor, with a secret
salary of six thousand marks. This sum, together with the salary of three
thousand marks openly granted him by the management of the Leipzig
Gewandhaus, would amply compensate him for the position he had
renounced in Berlin, and he had consequently consented to migrate to
Leipzig. This large grant had, for decency’s sake, to be kept secret by the
board administering the band funds, not only because it was detrimental to
the interests of the institution, but also because it might give offence to
those who were acting as conductors at a lower salary, if they knew another
man had been appointed to a sinecure. From these circumstances
Mendelssohn derived not only the advantage of having the grant kept a
secret, but also the satisfaction of allowing his friends to applaud him as a
model of self-sacrificing zeal for going to Leipzig; which they could easily
do, although they knew him to be in a good financial position. When I
explained this to Franck, he was astonished, and admitted it was one of the
strangest cases he had ever come across in connection with undeserved
fame.
We soon arrived at a mutual understanding in our views about many
other artistic celebrities with whom we came in contact at that time in
Dresden. This was a simple matter in the case of Ferdinand Hiller, who was
regarded as the chief of the ‘good-natured’ ones. Regarding the more
famous painters of the so-called Dusseldorf School, whom I met frequently
through the medium of Tannhäuser, it was not quite so easy to come to a
conclusion, as I was to a great extent influenced by the fame attached to
their well-known names; but here again Franck startled me with opportune
Page 352
and conclusive reasons for disappointment. When it was a question between
Bendemann and Hubner, it seemed to me that Hubner might very well be
sacrificed to Bendemann. The latter, who had only just completed the
frescoes for one of the reception-rooms at the royal palace, and had been
rewarded by his friends with a banquet, appeared to me to have the right to
be honoured as a great master. I was very much astonished, therefore, when
Franck calmly pitied the King of Saxony for having had his room
‘bedaubed’ by Bendemann! Nevertheless, there was no denying that these
people were ‘good-natured.’ My intercourse with them became more
frequent, and at all events offered me opportunities of mixing with the more
cultured artistic society, in distinction to the theatrical circles with which I
had usually associated; yet I never derived from it the least enthusiasm or
inspiration. The latter, however, appears to have been Hiller’s main object,
and that winter he organised a sort of social circle which held weekly
meetings at the home of one or the other of its members in turn. Reinecke,
who was both painter and poet, joined this society, together with Hubner
and Bendemann, and had the bad fortune to write the new text for an opera
for Hiller, the fate of which I will describe later on. Robert Schumann, the
musician, who was also in Dresden at this time, and was busy working out
on opera, which eventually developed into Genovefa, made advances to
Hiller and myself. I had already known Schumann in Leipzig, and we had
both entered upon our musical careers at about the same time. I had also
occasionally sent small contributions to the Neue Zeitschrift fur Musik, of
which he had formerly been editor, and more recently a longer one from
Paris on Rossini’s Stabat Mater. He had been asked to conduct his Paradies
und Peri at a concert to be given at the theatre; but his peculiar
awkwardness in conducting on that occasion aroused my sympathy for the
conscientious and energetic musician whose work made so strong an appeal
to me, and a kindly and friendly confidence soon grew up between us. After
a performance of Tannhäuser, at which he was present, he called on me one
morning and declared himself fully and decidedly in favour of my work.
The only objection he had to make was that the stretta of the second finale
was too abrupt, a criticism which proved his keenness of perception; and I
was able to show him, by the score, how I had been compelled, much
against my inclination, to curtail the opera, and thereby create the position
to which he had taken exception. We often met when out walking and, as
far as it was possible with a person so sparing of words, we exchanged
Bendemann and Hubner, it seemed to me that Hubner might very well be
sacrificed to Bendemann. The latter, who had only just completed the
frescoes for one of the reception-rooms at the royal palace, and had been
rewarded by his friends with a banquet, appeared to me to have the right to
be honoured as a great master. I was very much astonished, therefore, when
Franck calmly pitied the King of Saxony for having had his room
‘bedaubed’ by Bendemann! Nevertheless, there was no denying that these
people were ‘good-natured.’ My intercourse with them became more
frequent, and at all events offered me opportunities of mixing with the more
cultured artistic society, in distinction to the theatrical circles with which I
had usually associated; yet I never derived from it the least enthusiasm or
inspiration. The latter, however, appears to have been Hiller’s main object,
and that winter he organised a sort of social circle which held weekly
meetings at the home of one or the other of its members in turn. Reinecke,
who was both painter and poet, joined this society, together with Hubner
and Bendemann, and had the bad fortune to write the new text for an opera
for Hiller, the fate of which I will describe later on. Robert Schumann, the
musician, who was also in Dresden at this time, and was busy working out
on opera, which eventually developed into Genovefa, made advances to
Hiller and myself. I had already known Schumann in Leipzig, and we had
both entered upon our musical careers at about the same time. I had also
occasionally sent small contributions to the Neue Zeitschrift fur Musik, of
which he had formerly been editor, and more recently a longer one from
Paris on Rossini’s Stabat Mater. He had been asked to conduct his Paradies
und Peri at a concert to be given at the theatre; but his peculiar
awkwardness in conducting on that occasion aroused my sympathy for the
conscientious and energetic musician whose work made so strong an appeal
to me, and a kindly and friendly confidence soon grew up between us. After
a performance of Tannhäuser, at which he was present, he called on me one
morning and declared himself fully and decidedly in favour of my work.
The only objection he had to make was that the stretta of the second finale
was too abrupt, a criticism which proved his keenness of perception; and I
was able to show him, by the score, how I had been compelled, much
against my inclination, to curtail the opera, and thereby create the position
to which he had taken exception. We often met when out walking and, as
far as it was possible with a person so sparing of words, we exchanged
Page 353
views on matters of musical interest. He was looking forward to the
production, under my baton, of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, as he had
attended the performances at Leipzig, and had been very much disappointed
by Mendelssohn’s conducting, which had quite misunderstood the time of
the first movement. Otherwise his society did not inspire me particularly,
and the fact that he was too conservative to benefit by my views was soon
shown, more especially in his conception of the poem of Genovefa. It was
clear that my example had only made a very transient impression on him,
only just enough, in fact, to make him think it advisable to write the text of
an opera himself. He afterwards invited me to hear him read his libretto,
which was a combination of the styles of Hebbel and Tieck. When,
however, out of a genuine desire for the success of his work, about which I
had serious misgivings, I called his attention to some grave defects in it, and
suggested the necessary alterations, I realised how matters stood with this
extraordinary person: he simply wanted me to be swayed by himself, but
deeply resented any interference with the product of his own ideals, so that
thenceforward I let matters alone.
In the following winter, our circle, thanks to the assiduity of Hiller, was
considerably widened, and it now became a sort of club whose object was
to meet freely every week in a room at Engel’s restaurant at the Postplatz.
Just about this time the famous J. Schnorr of Munich was appointed director
of the museums in Dresden, and we entertained him at a banquet. I had
already seen some of his large and well-executed cartoons, which made a
deep impression on me, not only on account of their dimensions, but also by
reason of the events they depicted from old German history, in which I was
at that time particularly interested. It was through Schnorr that I now
became acquainted with the ‘Munich School’ of which he was the master.
My heart overflowed when I thought what it meant for Dresden, if such
giants of German art were to shake hands there. I was much struck by
Schnorr’s appearance and conversation, and I could not reconcile his
whining pedagogic manner with his mighty cartoons; however, I thought it
a great stroke of luck when he also took to frequenting Engel’s restaurant on
Saturdays. He was well versed in the old German legends, and I was
delighted when they formed the topic of conversation. The famous sculptor,
Hänel, used also to attend these meetings, and his marvellous talent inspired
me with the greatest respect, although I was not an authority on his work,
and could only judge of it by my own feelings. I soon saw that his bearing
production, under my baton, of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, as he had
attended the performances at Leipzig, and had been very much disappointed
by Mendelssohn’s conducting, which had quite misunderstood the time of
the first movement. Otherwise his society did not inspire me particularly,
and the fact that he was too conservative to benefit by my views was soon
shown, more especially in his conception of the poem of Genovefa. It was
clear that my example had only made a very transient impression on him,
only just enough, in fact, to make him think it advisable to write the text of
an opera himself. He afterwards invited me to hear him read his libretto,
which was a combination of the styles of Hebbel and Tieck. When,
however, out of a genuine desire for the success of his work, about which I
had serious misgivings, I called his attention to some grave defects in it, and
suggested the necessary alterations, I realised how matters stood with this
extraordinary person: he simply wanted me to be swayed by himself, but
deeply resented any interference with the product of his own ideals, so that
thenceforward I let matters alone.
In the following winter, our circle, thanks to the assiduity of Hiller, was
considerably widened, and it now became a sort of club whose object was
to meet freely every week in a room at Engel’s restaurant at the Postplatz.
Just about this time the famous J. Schnorr of Munich was appointed director
of the museums in Dresden, and we entertained him at a banquet. I had
already seen some of his large and well-executed cartoons, which made a
deep impression on me, not only on account of their dimensions, but also by
reason of the events they depicted from old German history, in which I was
at that time particularly interested. It was through Schnorr that I now
became acquainted with the ‘Munich School’ of which he was the master.
My heart overflowed when I thought what it meant for Dresden, if such
giants of German art were to shake hands there. I was much struck by
Schnorr’s appearance and conversation, and I could not reconcile his
whining pedagogic manner with his mighty cartoons; however, I thought it
a great stroke of luck when he also took to frequenting Engel’s restaurant on
Saturdays. He was well versed in the old German legends, and I was
delighted when they formed the topic of conversation. The famous sculptor,
Hänel, used also to attend these meetings, and his marvellous talent inspired
me with the greatest respect, although I was not an authority on his work,
and could only judge of it by my own feelings. I soon saw that his bearing
Page 354
and manner were affected; he was very fond of expressing his opinion and
judgment on questions of art, and I was not in a position to decide whether
they were reliable or otherwise. In fact, it often occurred to me that I was
listening to a Philistine swaggerer. It was only when my old friend Pecht,
who had also settled in Dresden for a time, clearly and emphatically
explained to me Hänel’s standing as an artist, that I conquered all my secret
doubts, and tried to find some pleasure in his works. Rietschel, who was
also a member of our society, was the very antithesis of Hänel. I often
found it difficult to believe that the pale delicate man, with the whining
nervous way of expressing himself, was really a sculptor; but as similar
peculiarities in Schnorr did not prevent me from recognising him as a
marvellous painter, this helped me to make friends with Rietschel, as he
was quite free from affectation, and had a warm sympathetic soul that drew
me ever closer to him. I also remember hearing from him a very
enthusiastic appreciation of my personality as a conductor. In spite,
however, of being fellow-members of our versatile art club, we never
attained a footing of real comradeship, for, after all, no one thought much of
anybody else’s talents. For instance, Hiller had arranged some orchestral
concerts, and to commemorate them he was entertained at the usual banquet
by his friends, when his services were gratefully acknowledged with due
rhetorical pathos. Yet I never found, in my private intercourse with Hiller’s
friends, the least enthusiasm in regard to his work; on the contrary, I only
noticed expressions of doubt and apprehensive shrugs.
These feted concerts soon came to an end. At our social evenings we
never discussed the works of the masters who were present; they were not
even mentioned, and it was soon evident that none of the members knew
what to talk about. Semper was the only man who, in his extraordinary
fashion, often so enlivened our entertainments that Rietschel, inwardly
sympathetic, though painfully startled, would heartily complain against the
unrestrained outbursts that led not infrequently to hot discussions between
Semper and myself. Strange to say, we two always seemed to start from the
hypothesis that we were antagonists, for he insisted upon regarding me as
the representative of mediaeval Catholicism, which he often attacked with
real fury. I eventually succeeded in persuading him that my studies and
inclinations had always led me to German antiquity, and to the discovery of
ideals in the early Teutonic myths. When we came to paganism, and I
expressed my enthusiasm for the genuine heathen legends, he became quite
judgment on questions of art, and I was not in a position to decide whether
they were reliable or otherwise. In fact, it often occurred to me that I was
listening to a Philistine swaggerer. It was only when my old friend Pecht,
who had also settled in Dresden for a time, clearly and emphatically
explained to me Hänel’s standing as an artist, that I conquered all my secret
doubts, and tried to find some pleasure in his works. Rietschel, who was
also a member of our society, was the very antithesis of Hänel. I often
found it difficult to believe that the pale delicate man, with the whining
nervous way of expressing himself, was really a sculptor; but as similar
peculiarities in Schnorr did not prevent me from recognising him as a
marvellous painter, this helped me to make friends with Rietschel, as he
was quite free from affectation, and had a warm sympathetic soul that drew
me ever closer to him. I also remember hearing from him a very
enthusiastic appreciation of my personality as a conductor. In spite,
however, of being fellow-members of our versatile art club, we never
attained a footing of real comradeship, for, after all, no one thought much of
anybody else’s talents. For instance, Hiller had arranged some orchestral
concerts, and to commemorate them he was entertained at the usual banquet
by his friends, when his services were gratefully acknowledged with due
rhetorical pathos. Yet I never found, in my private intercourse with Hiller’s
friends, the least enthusiasm in regard to his work; on the contrary, I only
noticed expressions of doubt and apprehensive shrugs.
These feted concerts soon came to an end. At our social evenings we
never discussed the works of the masters who were present; they were not
even mentioned, and it was soon evident that none of the members knew
what to talk about. Semper was the only man who, in his extraordinary
fashion, often so enlivened our entertainments that Rietschel, inwardly
sympathetic, though painfully startled, would heartily complain against the
unrestrained outbursts that led not infrequently to hot discussions between
Semper and myself. Strange to say, we two always seemed to start from the
hypothesis that we were antagonists, for he insisted upon regarding me as
the representative of mediaeval Catholicism, which he often attacked with
real fury. I eventually succeeded in persuading him that my studies and
inclinations had always led me to German antiquity, and to the discovery of
ideals in the early Teutonic myths. When we came to paganism, and I
expressed my enthusiasm for the genuine heathen legends, he became quite
Page 355
a different being, and a deep and growing interest now began to unite us in
such a way that it quite isolated us from the rest of the company. It was,
however, impossible ever to settle anything without a heated argument, not
only because Semper had a peculiar habit of contradicting everything flatly,
but also because he knew his views were opposed to those of the entire
company. His paradoxical assertions, which were apparently only intended
to stir up strife, soon made me realise, beyond any doubt, that he was the
only one present who was passionately in earnest about everything he said,
whereas all the others were quite content to let the matter drop when
convenient. A man of the latter type was Gutzkow, who was often with us;
he had been summoned to Dresden by the general management of our court
theatre, to act in the capacity of dramatist and adapter of plays. Several of
his pieces had recently met with great success: Zopf und Schwert, Das
Urbild des Tartuffe, and Uriel Acosta, shed an unexpected lustre on the
latest dramatic repertoire, and it seemed as though the advent of Gutzkow
would inaugurate a new era of glory for the Dresden theatre, where my
operas had also been first produced. The good intentions of the management
were certainly undeniable. My only regret on that occasion was that the
hopes my old friend Laube entertained of being summoned to Dresden to
fill that post were unrealised. He also had thrown himself enthusiastically
into the work of dramatic literature. Even in Paris I had noticed the
eagerness with which he used to study the technique of dramatic
composition, especially that of Scribe, in the hope of acquiring the skill of
that writer, without which, as he soon discovered, no poetical drama in
German could be successful. He maintained that he had thoroughly
mastered this style in his comedy, Rococo, and he cherished the conviction
that he could work up any imaginable material into an effective stage play.
At the same time, he was very careful to show equal skill in the selection
of his material. In my opinion this theory of his was a complete failure, as
his only successful pieces were those in which popular interest was excited
by catch-phrases. This interest was always more or less associated with the
politics of the day, and generally involved some obvious diatribes about
‘German unity’ and ‘German Liberalism.’ As this important stimulus was
first applied by way of experiment to the subscribers to our Residenz
Theater, and afterwards to the German public generally, it had, as I have
already said, to be worked out with the consummate skill which,
such a way that it quite isolated us from the rest of the company. It was,
however, impossible ever to settle anything without a heated argument, not
only because Semper had a peculiar habit of contradicting everything flatly,
but also because he knew his views were opposed to those of the entire
company. His paradoxical assertions, which were apparently only intended
to stir up strife, soon made me realise, beyond any doubt, that he was the
only one present who was passionately in earnest about everything he said,
whereas all the others were quite content to let the matter drop when
convenient. A man of the latter type was Gutzkow, who was often with us;
he had been summoned to Dresden by the general management of our court
theatre, to act in the capacity of dramatist and adapter of plays. Several of
his pieces had recently met with great success: Zopf und Schwert, Das
Urbild des Tartuffe, and Uriel Acosta, shed an unexpected lustre on the
latest dramatic repertoire, and it seemed as though the advent of Gutzkow
would inaugurate a new era of glory for the Dresden theatre, where my
operas had also been first produced. The good intentions of the management
were certainly undeniable. My only regret on that occasion was that the
hopes my old friend Laube entertained of being summoned to Dresden to
fill that post were unrealised. He also had thrown himself enthusiastically
into the work of dramatic literature. Even in Paris I had noticed the
eagerness with which he used to study the technique of dramatic
composition, especially that of Scribe, in the hope of acquiring the skill of
that writer, without which, as he soon discovered, no poetical drama in
German could be successful. He maintained that he had thoroughly
mastered this style in his comedy, Rococo, and he cherished the conviction
that he could work up any imaginable material into an effective stage play.
At the same time, he was very careful to show equal skill in the selection
of his material. In my opinion this theory of his was a complete failure, as
his only successful pieces were those in which popular interest was excited
by catch-phrases. This interest was always more or less associated with the
politics of the day, and generally involved some obvious diatribes about
‘German unity’ and ‘German Liberalism.’ As this important stimulus was
first applied by way of experiment to the subscribers to our Residenz
Theater, and afterwards to the German public generally, it had, as I have
already said, to be worked out with the consummate skill which,
Page 356
presumably, could only be learned from modern French writers of comic
opera.
I was very glad to see the result of this study in Laube’s plays, more
especially as when he visited us in Dresden, which he often did on the
occasion of a new production, he admitted his indebtedness with modest
candour, and was far from pretending to be a real poet. Moreover, he
displayed great skill and an almost fiery zeal, not only in the preparation of
his pieces, but also in their production, so that the offer of a post at Dresden,
the hope of which had been held out to him, would at least, from a practical
point of view, have been a benefit to the theatre. Finally, however, the
choice fell on his rival Gutzkow, in spite of his obvious unsuitability for the
practical work of dramatist. It was evident that even as regards his
successful plays his triumph was mainly due to his literary skill, because
these effective plays were immediately followed by wearisome productions
which made us realise, to our astonishment, that he himself could not have
been aware of the skill he had previously displayed. It was, however,
precisely these abstract qualities of the genuine man of letters which, in the
eyes of many, cast over him the halo of literary greatness; and when
Lüttichau, thinking more of a showy reputation than of permanent benefit to
his theatre, decided to give the preference to Gutzkow, he thought his
choice would give a special impetus to the cause of higher culture. To me
the appointment of Gutzkow as the director of dramatic art at the theatre
was peculiarly objectionable, as it was not long before I was convinced of
his utter incompetence for the task, and it was probably owing to the
frankness with which I expressed my opinion to Lüttichau that our
subsequent estrangement was originally due. I had to complain bitterly of
the want of judgment and the levity of those who so recklessly selected men
to fill the posts of managers and conductors in such precious institutions of
art as the German royal theatres. To obviate the failure I felt convinced must
follow on this important appointment, I made a special request that
Gutzkow should not be allowed to interfere in the management of the
opera; he readily yielded, and thus spared himself great humiliation. This
action, however, created a feeling of mistrust between us, though I was
quite ready to remove this as far as possible by coming into personal
contact with him whenever opportunity offered on those evenings when the
artists used to gather at the club, as already described. I would gladly have
made this strange man, whose head was anxiously bowed down on his
opera.
I was very glad to see the result of this study in Laube’s plays, more
especially as when he visited us in Dresden, which he often did on the
occasion of a new production, he admitted his indebtedness with modest
candour, and was far from pretending to be a real poet. Moreover, he
displayed great skill and an almost fiery zeal, not only in the preparation of
his pieces, but also in their production, so that the offer of a post at Dresden,
the hope of which had been held out to him, would at least, from a practical
point of view, have been a benefit to the theatre. Finally, however, the
choice fell on his rival Gutzkow, in spite of his obvious unsuitability for the
practical work of dramatist. It was evident that even as regards his
successful plays his triumph was mainly due to his literary skill, because
these effective plays were immediately followed by wearisome productions
which made us realise, to our astonishment, that he himself could not have
been aware of the skill he had previously displayed. It was, however,
precisely these abstract qualities of the genuine man of letters which, in the
eyes of many, cast over him the halo of literary greatness; and when
Lüttichau, thinking more of a showy reputation than of permanent benefit to
his theatre, decided to give the preference to Gutzkow, he thought his
choice would give a special impetus to the cause of higher culture. To me
the appointment of Gutzkow as the director of dramatic art at the theatre
was peculiarly objectionable, as it was not long before I was convinced of
his utter incompetence for the task, and it was probably owing to the
frankness with which I expressed my opinion to Lüttichau that our
subsequent estrangement was originally due. I had to complain bitterly of
the want of judgment and the levity of those who so recklessly selected men
to fill the posts of managers and conductors in such precious institutions of
art as the German royal theatres. To obviate the failure I felt convinced must
follow on this important appointment, I made a special request that
Gutzkow should not be allowed to interfere in the management of the
opera; he readily yielded, and thus spared himself great humiliation. This
action, however, created a feeling of mistrust between us, though I was
quite ready to remove this as far as possible by coming into personal
contact with him whenever opportunity offered on those evenings when the
artists used to gather at the club, as already described. I would gladly have
made this strange man, whose head was anxiously bowed down on his
Page 357
breast, relax and unburden himself in his conversations with me, but I was
unsuccessful, on account of his constant reserve and suspicion, and his
studied aloofness. An opportunity arose for a discussion between us when
he wanted the orchestra to take a melodramatic part (which they afterwards
did) in a certain scene of his Uriel Acosta, where the hero had to recant his
alleged heresy. The orchestra had to execute the soft tremolo for a given
time on certain chords, but when I heard the performance it appeared to me
absurd, and equally derogatory both for the music and the drama.
On one of these evenings I tried to come to an understanding with
Gutzkow concerning this, and the employment of music generally as a
melodramatic auxiliary to the drama, and I discussed my views on the
subject in accordance with the highest principles I had conceived. He met
all the chief points of my discussion with a nervous distrustful silence, but
finally explained that I really went too far in the significance which I
claimed for music, and that he failed to understand how music would be
degraded if it were applied more sparingly to the drama, seeing that the
claims of verse were often treated with much less respect when it was used
as a mere accessory to operatic music. To put it practically, in fact, it would
be advisable for the librettist not to be too dainty in this matter; it wasn’t
possible always to give the actor a brilliant exit; at the same time, however,
nothing could be more painful than when the chief performer made his exit
without any applause. In such cases a little distracting noise in the orchestra
really supplied a happy diversion. This I actually heard Gutzkow say;
moreover, I saw that he really meant it! After this I felt I had done with him.
It was not long before I had equally little to do with all the painters,
musicians, and other zealots in art belonging to our society. At the same
time, however, I came into closer contact with Berthold Auerbach. With
great enthusiasm, Alwine Frommann had already drawn my attention to
Auerbach’s Pastoral Stories. The account she gave of these modest works
(for that is how she characterised them) sounded quite attractive. She said
that they had had the same refreshing effect on her circle of friends in
Berlin as that produced by opening the window of a scented boudoir (to
which she compared the literature they had hitherto been used to), and
letting in the fresh air of the woods. After that I read the Pastoral Stories of
the Black Forest, which had so quickly become famous, and I, too, was
strongly attracted by the contents and tone of these realistic anecdotes about
the life of the people in a locality which it was easy enough to identify from
unsuccessful, on account of his constant reserve and suspicion, and his
studied aloofness. An opportunity arose for a discussion between us when
he wanted the orchestra to take a melodramatic part (which they afterwards
did) in a certain scene of his Uriel Acosta, where the hero had to recant his
alleged heresy. The orchestra had to execute the soft tremolo for a given
time on certain chords, but when I heard the performance it appeared to me
absurd, and equally derogatory both for the music and the drama.
On one of these evenings I tried to come to an understanding with
Gutzkow concerning this, and the employment of music generally as a
melodramatic auxiliary to the drama, and I discussed my views on the
subject in accordance with the highest principles I had conceived. He met
all the chief points of my discussion with a nervous distrustful silence, but
finally explained that I really went too far in the significance which I
claimed for music, and that he failed to understand how music would be
degraded if it were applied more sparingly to the drama, seeing that the
claims of verse were often treated with much less respect when it was used
as a mere accessory to operatic music. To put it practically, in fact, it would
be advisable for the librettist not to be too dainty in this matter; it wasn’t
possible always to give the actor a brilliant exit; at the same time, however,
nothing could be more painful than when the chief performer made his exit
without any applause. In such cases a little distracting noise in the orchestra
really supplied a happy diversion. This I actually heard Gutzkow say;
moreover, I saw that he really meant it! After this I felt I had done with him.
It was not long before I had equally little to do with all the painters,
musicians, and other zealots in art belonging to our society. At the same
time, however, I came into closer contact with Berthold Auerbach. With
great enthusiasm, Alwine Frommann had already drawn my attention to
Auerbach’s Pastoral Stories. The account she gave of these modest works
(for that is how she characterised them) sounded quite attractive. She said
that they had had the same refreshing effect on her circle of friends in
Berlin as that produced by opening the window of a scented boudoir (to
which she compared the literature they had hitherto been used to), and
letting in the fresh air of the woods. After that I read the Pastoral Stories of
the Black Forest, which had so quickly become famous, and I, too, was
strongly attracted by the contents and tone of these realistic anecdotes about
the life of the people in a locality which it was easy enough to identify from
Page 358
the vivid descriptions. As at this time Dresden seemed to be becoming ever
more and more the rendezvous for the lights of our literary and artistic
world, Auerbach also reconciled himself to taking up his quarters in this
city; and for quite a long time, lived with his friend Hiller, who thus again
had a celebrity at his side of equal standing with himself. The short, sturdy
Jewish peasant boy, as he was placed to represent himself to be, made a
very agreeable impression. It was only later that I understood the
significance of his green jacket, and above all of his green hunting-cap,
which made him look exactly what the author of Swabian Pastoral Stories
ought to look like, and this significance was anything but a naive one. The
Swiss poet, Gottfried Keller, once told me that, when Auerbach was in
Zürich, and he had decided on taking him up, he (Auerbach) had drawn his
attention to the best way in which to introduce one’s literary effusions to the
public, and to make money, and he advised him, above all things, to get a
coat and cap like his own, for being, as he said, like himself, neither
handsome nor well grown, it would be far better deliberately to make
himself look rough and queer; so saying, he placed his cap on his head in
such a way as to look a little rakish. For the time being, I perceived no real
affectation in Auerbach; he had assimilated so much of the tone and ways of
the people, and had done this so happily, that, in any case, one could not
help asking oneself why, with these delightful qualities, he should move
with such tremendous ease in spheres that seemed absolutely antagonistic.
At all events, he always seemed in his true element even in those circles
which really seemed most opposed to his assumed character; there he stood
in his green coat, keen, sensitive, and natural, surrounded by the
distinguished society that flattered him; and he loved to show letters he had
received from the Grand Duke of Weimar and his answers to them, all the
time looking at things from the standpoint of the Swabian peasant nature
which suited him so admirably.
What especially attracted me to him was the fact that he was the first Jew
I ever met with whom one could discuss Judaism with absolute freedom. He
even seemed particularly desirous of removing, in his agreeable manner, all
prejudice on this score; and it was really touching to hear him speak of his
boyhood, and declare that he was perhaps the only German who had read
Klopstock’s Messiah all through. Having one day become absorbed in this
work, which he read secretly in his cottage home, he had played the truant
from school, and when he finally arrived too late at the school-house, his
more and more the rendezvous for the lights of our literary and artistic
world, Auerbach also reconciled himself to taking up his quarters in this
city; and for quite a long time, lived with his friend Hiller, who thus again
had a celebrity at his side of equal standing with himself. The short, sturdy
Jewish peasant boy, as he was placed to represent himself to be, made a
very agreeable impression. It was only later that I understood the
significance of his green jacket, and above all of his green hunting-cap,
which made him look exactly what the author of Swabian Pastoral Stories
ought to look like, and this significance was anything but a naive one. The
Swiss poet, Gottfried Keller, once told me that, when Auerbach was in
Zürich, and he had decided on taking him up, he (Auerbach) had drawn his
attention to the best way in which to introduce one’s literary effusions to the
public, and to make money, and he advised him, above all things, to get a
coat and cap like his own, for being, as he said, like himself, neither
handsome nor well grown, it would be far better deliberately to make
himself look rough and queer; so saying, he placed his cap on his head in
such a way as to look a little rakish. For the time being, I perceived no real
affectation in Auerbach; he had assimilated so much of the tone and ways of
the people, and had done this so happily, that, in any case, one could not
help asking oneself why, with these delightful qualities, he should move
with such tremendous ease in spheres that seemed absolutely antagonistic.
At all events, he always seemed in his true element even in those circles
which really seemed most opposed to his assumed character; there he stood
in his green coat, keen, sensitive, and natural, surrounded by the
distinguished society that flattered him; and he loved to show letters he had
received from the Grand Duke of Weimar and his answers to them, all the
time looking at things from the standpoint of the Swabian peasant nature
which suited him so admirably.
What especially attracted me to him was the fact that he was the first Jew
I ever met with whom one could discuss Judaism with absolute freedom. He
even seemed particularly desirous of removing, in his agreeable manner, all
prejudice on this score; and it was really touching to hear him speak of his
boyhood, and declare that he was perhaps the only German who had read
Klopstock’s Messiah all through. Having one day become absorbed in this
work, which he read secretly in his cottage home, he had played the truant
from school, and when he finally arrived too late at the school-house, his
Page 359
teacher angrily exclaimed: ‘You confounded Jew-boy, where have you
been? Lending money again?’ Such experiences had only made him feel
pensive and melancholy, but not bitter, and he had even been inspired with
real compassion for the coarseness of his tormentors. These were traits in
his character which drew me very strongly to him. As time went on,
however, it seemed to me a serious matter that he could not get away from
the atmosphere of these ideas, for I began to feel that the universe contained
no other problem for him than the elucidation of the Jewish question. One
day, therefore, I protested as good-naturedly and confidentially as I could,
and advised him to let the whole problem of Judaism drop, as there were,
after all, many other standpoints from which the world might be criticised.
Strange to say, he thereupon not only lost his ingeniousness, but also fell to
whining in an ecstatic fashion, which did not seem to me very genuine, and
assured me that that would be an impossibility for him, as there was still so
much in Judaism which needed his whole sympathy. I could not help
recalling the surprising anguish which he had manifested on this occasion,
when I learned, in the course of time, that he had repeatedly arranged
Jewish marriages, concerning the happy result of which I heard nothing,
save that he had, by this means, made quite a fortune. When, several years
afterwards, I again saw him in Zürich, I observed that his appearance had
unfortunately changed in a manner quite disconcerting: he looked really
extraordinarily common and dirty; his former refreshing liveliness had
turned into the usual Jewish restlessness, and it was easy to see that all he
said was uttered as if he regretted that his words could not be turned to
better account in a newspaper article.
During his time in Dresden, however, Auerbach’s warm agreement with
my artistic projects really did me good, even though it may have been only
from his Semitic and Swabian standpoint; so did the novelty of the
experience I was at that time undergoing as an artist, in meeting with ever-
increasing regard and recognition among people of note, of acknowledged
importance and of exceptional culture. If, after the success obtained by
Rienzi, I still remained with the circle of the real theatrical world, the
greater success following on Tannhäuser certainly brought me into contact
with such people as I have mentioned above, who, though to be sure they
considerably enlarged my ideas, at the same time impressed me very
unfavourably with what was apparently the pinnacle of the artistic life of
the period. At any rate, I felt neither rewarded nor, fortunately, even
been? Lending money again?’ Such experiences had only made him feel
pensive and melancholy, but not bitter, and he had even been inspired with
real compassion for the coarseness of his tormentors. These were traits in
his character which drew me very strongly to him. As time went on,
however, it seemed to me a serious matter that he could not get away from
the atmosphere of these ideas, for I began to feel that the universe contained
no other problem for him than the elucidation of the Jewish question. One
day, therefore, I protested as good-naturedly and confidentially as I could,
and advised him to let the whole problem of Judaism drop, as there were,
after all, many other standpoints from which the world might be criticised.
Strange to say, he thereupon not only lost his ingeniousness, but also fell to
whining in an ecstatic fashion, which did not seem to me very genuine, and
assured me that that would be an impossibility for him, as there was still so
much in Judaism which needed his whole sympathy. I could not help
recalling the surprising anguish which he had manifested on this occasion,
when I learned, in the course of time, that he had repeatedly arranged
Jewish marriages, concerning the happy result of which I heard nothing,
save that he had, by this means, made quite a fortune. When, several years
afterwards, I again saw him in Zürich, I observed that his appearance had
unfortunately changed in a manner quite disconcerting: he looked really
extraordinarily common and dirty; his former refreshing liveliness had
turned into the usual Jewish restlessness, and it was easy to see that all he
said was uttered as if he regretted that his words could not be turned to
better account in a newspaper article.
During his time in Dresden, however, Auerbach’s warm agreement with
my artistic projects really did me good, even though it may have been only
from his Semitic and Swabian standpoint; so did the novelty of the
experience I was at that time undergoing as an artist, in meeting with ever-
increasing regard and recognition among people of note, of acknowledged
importance and of exceptional culture. If, after the success obtained by
Rienzi, I still remained with the circle of the real theatrical world, the
greater success following on Tannhäuser certainly brought me into contact
with such people as I have mentioned above, who, though to be sure they
considerably enlarged my ideas, at the same time impressed me very
unfavourably with what was apparently the pinnacle of the artistic life of
the period. At any rate, I felt neither rewarded nor, fortunately, even
Page 360
diverted by the acquaintances I won by the first performance of my
Tannhäuser that winter. On the contrary, I felt an irresistible desire to
withdraw into my shell and leave these gay surroundings into which,
strangely enough, I had been introduced at the instigation of Hiller, whom I
soon recognised as being a nonentity. I felt I must quickly compose
something, as this was the only means of ridding myself of all the
disturbing and painful excitement Tannhäuser had produced in me.
Only a few weeks after the first performances I had worked out the whole
of the Lohengrin text. In November I had already read this poem to my
intimate friends, and soon afterwards to the Hiller set. It was praised, and
pronounced ‘effective.’ Schumann also thoroughly approved of it, although
he did not understand the musical form in which I wished to carry it out, as
he saw no resemblance in it to the old methods of writing individual solos
for the various artists. I then had some fun in reading different parts of my
work to him in the form of arias and cavatinas, after which he laughingly
declared himself satisfied.
Serious reflection, however, aroused my gravest doubts as to the tragic
character of the material itself, and to these doubts I had been led, in a
manner both sensible and tactful, by Franck. He thought it offensive to
effect Elsa’s punishment through Lohengrin’s departure; for although he
understood that the characteristics of the legend were expressed precisely
by this highly poetical feature, he was doubtful as to whether it did full
justice to the demands of tragic feeling in its relation to dramatic realism.
He would have preferred to see Lohengrin die before our eyes owing to
Elsa’s loving treachery. As, however, this did not seem feasible, he would
have liked to see Lohengrin spell-bound by some powerful motive, and
prevented from getting away. Although, of course, I would not agree to any
of these suggestions, I went so far as to consider whether I could not do
away with the cruel separation, and still retain the incident of Lohengrin’s
departure, which was essential. I then sought for a means of letting Elsa go
away with Lohengrin, as a form of penance which would withdraw her also
from the world. This seemed more promising to my talented friend. While I
was still very doubtful about all this, I gave my poem to Frau von
Lüttichau, so that she might peruse it, and criticise the point raised by
Franck. In a little letter, in which she expressed her pleasure at my poem,
she wrote briefly, but very decidedly, on the knotty question, and declared
that Franck must be devoid of all poetry if he did not understand that it was
Tannhäuser that winter. On the contrary, I felt an irresistible desire to
withdraw into my shell and leave these gay surroundings into which,
strangely enough, I had been introduced at the instigation of Hiller, whom I
soon recognised as being a nonentity. I felt I must quickly compose
something, as this was the only means of ridding myself of all the
disturbing and painful excitement Tannhäuser had produced in me.
Only a few weeks after the first performances I had worked out the whole
of the Lohengrin text. In November I had already read this poem to my
intimate friends, and soon afterwards to the Hiller set. It was praised, and
pronounced ‘effective.’ Schumann also thoroughly approved of it, although
he did not understand the musical form in which I wished to carry it out, as
he saw no resemblance in it to the old methods of writing individual solos
for the various artists. I then had some fun in reading different parts of my
work to him in the form of arias and cavatinas, after which he laughingly
declared himself satisfied.
Serious reflection, however, aroused my gravest doubts as to the tragic
character of the material itself, and to these doubts I had been led, in a
manner both sensible and tactful, by Franck. He thought it offensive to
effect Elsa’s punishment through Lohengrin’s departure; for although he
understood that the characteristics of the legend were expressed precisely
by this highly poetical feature, he was doubtful as to whether it did full
justice to the demands of tragic feeling in its relation to dramatic realism.
He would have preferred to see Lohengrin die before our eyes owing to
Elsa’s loving treachery. As, however, this did not seem feasible, he would
have liked to see Lohengrin spell-bound by some powerful motive, and
prevented from getting away. Although, of course, I would not agree to any
of these suggestions, I went so far as to consider whether I could not do
away with the cruel separation, and still retain the incident of Lohengrin’s
departure, which was essential. I then sought for a means of letting Elsa go
away with Lohengrin, as a form of penance which would withdraw her also
from the world. This seemed more promising to my talented friend. While I
was still very doubtful about all this, I gave my poem to Frau von
Lüttichau, so that she might peruse it, and criticise the point raised by
Franck. In a little letter, in which she expressed her pleasure at my poem,
she wrote briefly, but very decidedly, on the knotty question, and declared
that Franck must be devoid of all poetry if he did not understand that it was
Page 361
exactly in the way I had chosen, and in no other, that Lohengrin must
depart. I felt as if a load had fallen from my heart. In triumph I showed the
letter to Franck, who, much abashed, and by way of excusing himself,
opened a correspondence with Frau von Lüttichau, which certainly cannot
have been lacking in interest, though I was never able to see any of it. In
any case, the upshot of it was that Lohengrin remained as I had originally
conceived it. Curiously enough, some time later, I had a similar experience
with regard to the same subject, which again put me in a temporary state of
uncertainty. When Adolf Stahr gravely raised the same objection to the
solution of the Lohengrin question, I was really taken aback by the
uniformity of opinion; and as, owing to some excitement, I was just then no
longer in the same mood as when I composed Lohengrin, I was foolish
enough to write a hurried letter to Stahr in which, with but a few slight
reservations, I declared him to be right. I did not know that, by this, I was
causing real grief to Liszt, who was now in the same position with regard to
Stahr as Frau von Lüttichau had been with regard to Franck. Fortunately,
however, the displeasure of my great friend at my supposed treachery to
myself did not last long; for, without having got wind of the trouble I had
caused him, and thanks to the torture I myself was going through, I came to
the proper decision in a few days, and, as clear as daylight, I saw what
madness it had been. I was therefore able to rejoice Liszt with the following
laconical protest which I sent him from my Swiss resort: ‘Stahr is wrong,
and Lohengrin is right.’
For the present I remained occupied with the revision of my poem, for
there could be no question of planning the music to it just now. That
peaceful and harmonious state of mind which is so favourable to creative
work, and always so necessary to me for composing, I now had to secure
with the greatest difficulty, for it was one of the things I always had the
hardest struggle to obtain. All the experiences connected with the
performance of Tannhäuser having filled me with true despair as to the
whole future of my artistic operations, I saw it was hopeless to think of its
production being extended to other German theatres—for I had not been
able to achieve this end even with the successful Rienzi. It was perfectly
obvious, therefore, that my work would, at the utmost, be conceded a
permanent place in the Dresden repertoire. As the result of all this, my
pecuniary affairs, which have already been described, had got into such a
serious state that a catastrophe seemed inevitable. While I was preparing to
depart. I felt as if a load had fallen from my heart. In triumph I showed the
letter to Franck, who, much abashed, and by way of excusing himself,
opened a correspondence with Frau von Lüttichau, which certainly cannot
have been lacking in interest, though I was never able to see any of it. In
any case, the upshot of it was that Lohengrin remained as I had originally
conceived it. Curiously enough, some time later, I had a similar experience
with regard to the same subject, which again put me in a temporary state of
uncertainty. When Adolf Stahr gravely raised the same objection to the
solution of the Lohengrin question, I was really taken aback by the
uniformity of opinion; and as, owing to some excitement, I was just then no
longer in the same mood as when I composed Lohengrin, I was foolish
enough to write a hurried letter to Stahr in which, with but a few slight
reservations, I declared him to be right. I did not know that, by this, I was
causing real grief to Liszt, who was now in the same position with regard to
Stahr as Frau von Lüttichau had been with regard to Franck. Fortunately,
however, the displeasure of my great friend at my supposed treachery to
myself did not last long; for, without having got wind of the trouble I had
caused him, and thanks to the torture I myself was going through, I came to
the proper decision in a few days, and, as clear as daylight, I saw what
madness it had been. I was therefore able to rejoice Liszt with the following
laconical protest which I sent him from my Swiss resort: ‘Stahr is wrong,
and Lohengrin is right.’
For the present I remained occupied with the revision of my poem, for
there could be no question of planning the music to it just now. That
peaceful and harmonious state of mind which is so favourable to creative
work, and always so necessary to me for composing, I now had to secure
with the greatest difficulty, for it was one of the things I always had the
hardest struggle to obtain. All the experiences connected with the
performance of Tannhäuser having filled me with true despair as to the
whole future of my artistic operations, I saw it was hopeless to think of its
production being extended to other German theatres—for I had not been
able to achieve this end even with the successful Rienzi. It was perfectly
obvious, therefore, that my work would, at the utmost, be conceded a
permanent place in the Dresden repertoire. As the result of all this, my
pecuniary affairs, which have already been described, had got into such a
serious state that a catastrophe seemed inevitable. While I was preparing to
Page 362
meet this in the best way I could, I tried to stupefy myself, on the one hand,
by plunging into the study of history, mythology, and literature, which were
becoming ever dearer and dearer to me, and on the other by working
incessantly at my artistic enterprises. As regards the former, I was chiefly
interested in the German Middle Ages, and tried to make myself familiar
with every point relative to this period. Although I could not set about this
task with philological precision, I proceeded with such earnestness that I
studied the German records, published by Grimm, for instance, with the
greatest interest. As I could not put the results of such studies immediately
into my scenes, there were many who could not understand why, as an
operatic composer, I should waste my time on such barren work. Different
people remarked later on, that the personality of Lohengrin had a charm
quite its own; but this was ascribed to the happy selection of the subject,
and I was specially praised for choosing it. Material from the German
Middle Ages, and later on, subjects from Scandinavian antiquity, were
therefore looked forward to by many, and, in the end, they were astonished
that I gave them no adequate result of all my labours. Perhaps it will be of
help to them if I now tell them to take the old records and such works to
their aid. I forgot at that time to call Hiller’s attention to my documents, and
with great pride he seized upon a subject out of the history of the
Hohenstaufen. As, however, he had no success with his work, he may
perhaps think I was a little artful for not having spoken to him of the old
records.
Concerning my other duties, my chief undertaking for this winter
consisted in an exceptionally carefully prepared performance of
Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, which took place in the spring on Palm
Sunday. This performance involved many a struggle, besides a host of
experiences which were destined to exercise a strong influence over my
further development. Roughly they were as follows: the royal orchestra had
only one opportunity a year of showing their powers independently in a
musical performance outside the Opera or the church. For the benefit of the
Pension Fund for their widows and orphans, the old so-called Opera House
was given up to a big performance originally only intended for oratorios.
Ultimately, in order to make it more attractive, a symphony was always
added to the oratorio; and, as already mentioned, I had performed on such
occasions, once the Pastoral Symphony, and later Haydn’s Creation. The
latter was a great joy to me, and it was on this occasion that I first made its
by plunging into the study of history, mythology, and literature, which were
becoming ever dearer and dearer to me, and on the other by working
incessantly at my artistic enterprises. As regards the former, I was chiefly
interested in the German Middle Ages, and tried to make myself familiar
with every point relative to this period. Although I could not set about this
task with philological precision, I proceeded with such earnestness that I
studied the German records, published by Grimm, for instance, with the
greatest interest. As I could not put the results of such studies immediately
into my scenes, there were many who could not understand why, as an
operatic composer, I should waste my time on such barren work. Different
people remarked later on, that the personality of Lohengrin had a charm
quite its own; but this was ascribed to the happy selection of the subject,
and I was specially praised for choosing it. Material from the German
Middle Ages, and later on, subjects from Scandinavian antiquity, were
therefore looked forward to by many, and, in the end, they were astonished
that I gave them no adequate result of all my labours. Perhaps it will be of
help to them if I now tell them to take the old records and such works to
their aid. I forgot at that time to call Hiller’s attention to my documents, and
with great pride he seized upon a subject out of the history of the
Hohenstaufen. As, however, he had no success with his work, he may
perhaps think I was a little artful for not having spoken to him of the old
records.
Concerning my other duties, my chief undertaking for this winter
consisted in an exceptionally carefully prepared performance of
Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, which took place in the spring on Palm
Sunday. This performance involved many a struggle, besides a host of
experiences which were destined to exercise a strong influence over my
further development. Roughly they were as follows: the royal orchestra had
only one opportunity a year of showing their powers independently in a
musical performance outside the Opera or the church. For the benefit of the
Pension Fund for their widows and orphans, the old so-called Opera House
was given up to a big performance originally only intended for oratorios.
Ultimately, in order to make it more attractive, a symphony was always
added to the oratorio; and, as already mentioned, I had performed on such
occasions, once the Pastoral Symphony, and later Haydn’s Creation. The
latter was a great joy to me, and it was on this occasion that I first made its
Page 363
acquaintance. As we two conductors had stipulated for alternate
performances, the Symphony on Palm Sunday of the year 1846 fell to my
lot. I had a great longing for the Ninth Symphony, and I was led to the
choice of this work by the fact that it was almost unknown in Dresden.
When the directors of the orchestra, who were the trustees of the Pension
Fund, and who had to promote its increase, got to know of this, such a
fright seized them that they interviewed the general director, Lüttichau, and
begged him, by virtue of his high authority, to dissuade me from carrying
out my intention. They gave as a reason for this request, that the Pension
Fund would surely suffer through the choice of this symphony, as the work
was in ill-repute in the place, and would certainly keep people from going
to the concert. The symphony had been performed many years before by
Reissiger at a charity concert, and, as the conductor himself honestly
admitted, had been an absolute failure. Now it needed my whole ardour, and
all the eloquence I could command, to prevail over the doubts of our
principal. With the orchestral directors, however, there was nothing for me
to do but quarrel, as I heard that they were complaining all over the town
about my indiscretion. In order to add shame to their trouble, I made up my
mind to prepare the public in such a way for the performance, upon which I
had resolved, and for the work itself, that at least the sensation caused
would lead to a full hall and thus, in a very favourable manner, guarantee
satisfactory returns, and contradict their belief that the fund was menaced.
Thus the Ninth Symphony had, in every conceivable way, become for me a
point of honour, for the success of which I had to exercise all my powers to
the utmost. The committee had misgivings regarding the outlay needed for
procuring the orchestral parts, so I borrowed them from the Leipzig Concert
Society.
Imagine my feelings, however, on now seeing for the first time since my
earliest boyhood the mysterious pages of this score, which I studied
conscientiously! In those days the sight of these same pages had filled me
with the most mystic reveries, and I had stayed up for nights together to
copy them out. Just as at the time of my uncertainty in Paris, on hearing the
rehearsal of the first three movements performed by the incomparable
orchestra of the Conservatoire, I had been carried back through years of
error and doubt to be placed in marvellous touch with my earliest days,
while all my inmost aspirations had been fruitfully stimulated in a new
direction, so now in the same way the memory of that music was secretly
performances, the Symphony on Palm Sunday of the year 1846 fell to my
lot. I had a great longing for the Ninth Symphony, and I was led to the
choice of this work by the fact that it was almost unknown in Dresden.
When the directors of the orchestra, who were the trustees of the Pension
Fund, and who had to promote its increase, got to know of this, such a
fright seized them that they interviewed the general director, Lüttichau, and
begged him, by virtue of his high authority, to dissuade me from carrying
out my intention. They gave as a reason for this request, that the Pension
Fund would surely suffer through the choice of this symphony, as the work
was in ill-repute in the place, and would certainly keep people from going
to the concert. The symphony had been performed many years before by
Reissiger at a charity concert, and, as the conductor himself honestly
admitted, had been an absolute failure. Now it needed my whole ardour, and
all the eloquence I could command, to prevail over the doubts of our
principal. With the orchestral directors, however, there was nothing for me
to do but quarrel, as I heard that they were complaining all over the town
about my indiscretion. In order to add shame to their trouble, I made up my
mind to prepare the public in such a way for the performance, upon which I
had resolved, and for the work itself, that at least the sensation caused
would lead to a full hall and thus, in a very favourable manner, guarantee
satisfactory returns, and contradict their belief that the fund was menaced.
Thus the Ninth Symphony had, in every conceivable way, become for me a
point of honour, for the success of which I had to exercise all my powers to
the utmost. The committee had misgivings regarding the outlay needed for
procuring the orchestral parts, so I borrowed them from the Leipzig Concert
Society.
Imagine my feelings, however, on now seeing for the first time since my
earliest boyhood the mysterious pages of this score, which I studied
conscientiously! In those days the sight of these same pages had filled me
with the most mystic reveries, and I had stayed up for nights together to
copy them out. Just as at the time of my uncertainty in Paris, on hearing the
rehearsal of the first three movements performed by the incomparable
orchestra of the Conservatoire, I had been carried back through years of
error and doubt to be placed in marvellous touch with my earliest days,
while all my inmost aspirations had been fruitfully stimulated in a new
direction, so now in the same way the memory of that music was secretly
Page 364
awakened in me as I again saw before my own eyes that which in those
early days had likewise been only a mysterious vision. I had by this time
experienced much which, in the depths of my soul, drove me almost
unconsciously to a process of summing-up, to an almost despairing inquiry
concerning my fate. What I dared not acknowledge to myself was the fact
of the absolute insecurity of my existence both from the artistic and
financial point of view; for I saw that I was a stranger to my own mode of
life as well as to my profession, and I had no prospects whatsoever. This
despair, which I tried to conceal from my friends, was now converted into
genuine exaltation, thanks entirely to the Ninth Symphony. It is not likely
that the heart of a disciple has ever been filled with such keen rapture over
the work of a master, as mine was at the first movement of this symphony.
If any one had come upon me unexpectedly while I had the open score
before me, and had seen me convulsed with sobs and tears as I went
through the work in order to consider the best manner of rendering it, he
would certainly have asked with astonishment if this were really fitting
behaviour for the Conductor Royal of Saxony! Fortunately, on such
occasions I was spared the visits of our orchestra directors, and their worthy
conductor Reissiger, and even those of F. Hiller, who was so versed in
classical music.
In the first place I drew up a programme, for which the book of words for
the chorus—always ordered according to custom—furnished me with a
good pretext. I did this in order to provide a guide to the simple
understanding of the work, and thereby hoped to appeal not to the critical
judgment, but solely to the feelings, of the audience. This programme, in
the framing of which some of the chief passages in Goethe’s Faust were
exceedingly helpful to me, was very well received, not only on that
occasion in Dresden, but later on in other places. Besides this, I made use of
the Dresden Anzeiger, by writing all kinds of short and enthusiastic
anonymous paragraphs, in order to whet the public taste for a work which
hitherto had been in ill-repute in Dresden.
Not only did these purely extraneous exertions succeed in making the
receipts of that year by far exceed any that had been taken theretofore, but
the orchestra directors themselves, during the remaining years of my stay in
Dresden, made a point of ensuring similarly large profits by repeated
performances of the celebrated symphony. Concerning the artistic side of
the performance, I aimed at making the orchestra give as expressive a
early days had likewise been only a mysterious vision. I had by this time
experienced much which, in the depths of my soul, drove me almost
unconsciously to a process of summing-up, to an almost despairing inquiry
concerning my fate. What I dared not acknowledge to myself was the fact
of the absolute insecurity of my existence both from the artistic and
financial point of view; for I saw that I was a stranger to my own mode of
life as well as to my profession, and I had no prospects whatsoever. This
despair, which I tried to conceal from my friends, was now converted into
genuine exaltation, thanks entirely to the Ninth Symphony. It is not likely
that the heart of a disciple has ever been filled with such keen rapture over
the work of a master, as mine was at the first movement of this symphony.
If any one had come upon me unexpectedly while I had the open score
before me, and had seen me convulsed with sobs and tears as I went
through the work in order to consider the best manner of rendering it, he
would certainly have asked with astonishment if this were really fitting
behaviour for the Conductor Royal of Saxony! Fortunately, on such
occasions I was spared the visits of our orchestra directors, and their worthy
conductor Reissiger, and even those of F. Hiller, who was so versed in
classical music.
In the first place I drew up a programme, for which the book of words for
the chorus—always ordered according to custom—furnished me with a
good pretext. I did this in order to provide a guide to the simple
understanding of the work, and thereby hoped to appeal not to the critical
judgment, but solely to the feelings, of the audience. This programme, in
the framing of which some of the chief passages in Goethe’s Faust were
exceedingly helpful to me, was very well received, not only on that
occasion in Dresden, but later on in other places. Besides this, I made use of
the Dresden Anzeiger, by writing all kinds of short and enthusiastic
anonymous paragraphs, in order to whet the public taste for a work which
hitherto had been in ill-repute in Dresden.
Not only did these purely extraneous exertions succeed in making the
receipts of that year by far exceed any that had been taken theretofore, but
the orchestra directors themselves, during the remaining years of my stay in
Dresden, made a point of ensuring similarly large profits by repeated
performances of the celebrated symphony. Concerning the artistic side of
the performance, I aimed at making the orchestra give as expressive a
Page 365
rendering as possible, and to this end made all kinds of notes, myself, in the
various parts, so as to make quite sure that their interpretation would be as
clear and as coloured as could be desired. It was principally the custom
which existed then of doubling the wind instruments, that led me to a most
careful consideration of the advantages this system presented, for, in
performances on a large scale, the following somewhat crude rule
prevailed: all those passages marked piano were executed by a single set of
instruments, while those marked forte were carried out by a duplicated set.
As an instance of the way in which I took care to ensure an intelligible
rendering by this means, I might point to a certain passage in the second
movement of the symphony, where the whole of the string instruments play
the principal and rhythmical figure in C major for the first time; it is written
in triple octaves, which play uninterruptedly in unison and, to a certain
degree, serve as an accompaniment to the second theme, which is only
performed by feeble wood instruments. As fortissimo is indicated alike for
the whole orchestra, the result in every imaginable rendering must be that
the melody for the wood instruments not only completely disappears, but
cannot even be heard through the strings, which, after all, are only
accompanying. Now, as I never carried my piety to the extent of taking
directions absolutely literally, rather than sacrifice the effect really intended
by the master to the erroneous indications given, I made the strings play
only moderately loudly instead of real fortissimo, up to the point where they
alternate with the wind instruments in taking up the continuation of the new
theme: thus the motive, rendered as it was as loudly as possible by a double
set of wind instruments, was, I believe for the first time since the existence
of the symphony, heard with real distinctness. I proceeded in this manner
throughout, in order to guarantee the greatest exactitude in the dynamical
effects of the orchestra. There was nothing, however difficult, which was
allowed to be performed in such a way as not to arouse the feelings of the
audience in a particular manner. For example, many brains had been
puzzled by the Fugato in 6/8 time which comes after the chorus, Froh wie
seine Sonnen fliegen, in the movement of the finale marked alia marcia. In
view of the preceding inspiriting verses, which seemed to be preparing for
combat and victory, I conceived this Fugato really as a glad but earnest war-
song, and I took it at a continuously fiery tempo, and with the utmost
vigour. The day following the first performance I had the satisfaction of
receiving a visit from the musical director Anacker of Freiburg, who came
various parts, so as to make quite sure that their interpretation would be as
clear and as coloured as could be desired. It was principally the custom
which existed then of doubling the wind instruments, that led me to a most
careful consideration of the advantages this system presented, for, in
performances on a large scale, the following somewhat crude rule
prevailed: all those passages marked piano were executed by a single set of
instruments, while those marked forte were carried out by a duplicated set.
As an instance of the way in which I took care to ensure an intelligible
rendering by this means, I might point to a certain passage in the second
movement of the symphony, where the whole of the string instruments play
the principal and rhythmical figure in C major for the first time; it is written
in triple octaves, which play uninterruptedly in unison and, to a certain
degree, serve as an accompaniment to the second theme, which is only
performed by feeble wood instruments. As fortissimo is indicated alike for
the whole orchestra, the result in every imaginable rendering must be that
the melody for the wood instruments not only completely disappears, but
cannot even be heard through the strings, which, after all, are only
accompanying. Now, as I never carried my piety to the extent of taking
directions absolutely literally, rather than sacrifice the effect really intended
by the master to the erroneous indications given, I made the strings play
only moderately loudly instead of real fortissimo, up to the point where they
alternate with the wind instruments in taking up the continuation of the new
theme: thus the motive, rendered as it was as loudly as possible by a double
set of wind instruments, was, I believe for the first time since the existence
of the symphony, heard with real distinctness. I proceeded in this manner
throughout, in order to guarantee the greatest exactitude in the dynamical
effects of the orchestra. There was nothing, however difficult, which was
allowed to be performed in such a way as not to arouse the feelings of the
audience in a particular manner. For example, many brains had been
puzzled by the Fugato in 6/8 time which comes after the chorus, Froh wie
seine Sonnen fliegen, in the movement of the finale marked alia marcia. In
view of the preceding inspiriting verses, which seemed to be preparing for
combat and victory, I conceived this Fugato really as a glad but earnest war-
song, and I took it at a continuously fiery tempo, and with the utmost
vigour. The day following the first performance I had the satisfaction of
receiving a visit from the musical director Anacker of Freiburg, who came
Page 366
to tell me somewhat penitently, that though until then he had been one of
my antagonists, since the performance of the symphony he certainly
reckoned himself among my friends. What had absolutely overwhelmed
him, he said, was precisely my conception and interpretation of the Fugato.
Furthermore, I devoted special attention to that extraordinary passage,
resembling a recitative for the ‘cellos and basses, which comes at the
beginning of the last movement, and which had once caused my old friend
Pohlenz such great humiliation in Leipzig. Thanks to the exceptional
excellence of our bass players, I felt certain of attaining to absolute
perfection in this passage. After twelve special rehearsals of the instruments
alone concerned, I succeeded in getting them to perform in a way which
sounded not only perfectly free, but which also expressed the most
exquisite tenderness and the greatest energy in a thoroughly impressive
manner.
From the very beginning of my undertaking I had at once recognised, that
the only method of achieving overwhelming popular success with this
symphony was to overcome, by some ideal means, the extraordinary
difficulties presented by the choral parts. I realised that the demands made
by these parts could be met only by a large and enthusiastic body of singers.
It was above all necessary, then, to secure a very good and large choir; so,
besides adding the somewhat feeble Dreissig ‘Academy of Singing’ to our
usual number of members in the theatre chorus, in spite of great difficulties
I also enlisted the help of the choir from the Kreuzschule, with its fine boys’
voices, and the choir of the Dresden seminary, which had had much practice
in church singing. In a way quite my own I now tried to get these three
hundred singers, who were frequently united for rehearsals, into a state of
genuine ecstasy; for instance, I succeeded in demonstrating to the basses
that the celebrated passage Seid umschlungen, Millionen, and especially
Bruder, uber’m Sternenzelt muss ein guter Vater wohnen, could not be sung
in an ordinary manner, but must, as it were, be proclaimed with the greatest
rapture. In this I took the lead in a manner so elated that I really think I
literally transported them to a world of emotion utterly strange to them for a
while; and I did not desist till my voice, which had been heard clearly above
all the others, began to be no longer distinguishable even to myself, but was
drowned, so to speak, in the warm sea of sound.
It gave me particular pleasure, with Mitterwurzer’s cooperation, to give a
most overwhelmingly expressive rendering of the recitative for baritone:
my antagonists, since the performance of the symphony he certainly
reckoned himself among my friends. What had absolutely overwhelmed
him, he said, was precisely my conception and interpretation of the Fugato.
Furthermore, I devoted special attention to that extraordinary passage,
resembling a recitative for the ‘cellos and basses, which comes at the
beginning of the last movement, and which had once caused my old friend
Pohlenz such great humiliation in Leipzig. Thanks to the exceptional
excellence of our bass players, I felt certain of attaining to absolute
perfection in this passage. After twelve special rehearsals of the instruments
alone concerned, I succeeded in getting them to perform in a way which
sounded not only perfectly free, but which also expressed the most
exquisite tenderness and the greatest energy in a thoroughly impressive
manner.
From the very beginning of my undertaking I had at once recognised, that
the only method of achieving overwhelming popular success with this
symphony was to overcome, by some ideal means, the extraordinary
difficulties presented by the choral parts. I realised that the demands made
by these parts could be met only by a large and enthusiastic body of singers.
It was above all necessary, then, to secure a very good and large choir; so,
besides adding the somewhat feeble Dreissig ‘Academy of Singing’ to our
usual number of members in the theatre chorus, in spite of great difficulties
I also enlisted the help of the choir from the Kreuzschule, with its fine boys’
voices, and the choir of the Dresden seminary, which had had much practice
in church singing. In a way quite my own I now tried to get these three
hundred singers, who were frequently united for rehearsals, into a state of
genuine ecstasy; for instance, I succeeded in demonstrating to the basses
that the celebrated passage Seid umschlungen, Millionen, and especially
Bruder, uber’m Sternenzelt muss ein guter Vater wohnen, could not be sung
in an ordinary manner, but must, as it were, be proclaimed with the greatest
rapture. In this I took the lead in a manner so elated that I really think I
literally transported them to a world of emotion utterly strange to them for a
while; and I did not desist till my voice, which had been heard clearly above
all the others, began to be no longer distinguishable even to myself, but was
drowned, so to speak, in the warm sea of sound.
It gave me particular pleasure, with Mitterwurzer’s cooperation, to give a
most overwhelmingly expressive rendering of the recitative for baritone:
Page 367
Freunde, nicht diese Tone. In view of its exceptional difficulties this
passage might almost be considered impossible to perform, and yet he
executed it in a way which showed what fruit our mutual interchange of
ideas had borne. I also took care that, by means of the complete
reconstruction of the hall, I should obtain good acoustic conditions for the
orchestra, which I had arranged according to quite a new system of my
own. As may be imagined, it was only with the greatest difficulty that the
money for this could be found; however, I did not give up, and owing to a
totally new construction of the platform, I was able to concentrate the whole
of the orchestra towards the centre, and surround it, in amphitheatre
fashion, by the throng of singers who were accommodated on seats very
considerably raised. This was not only of great advantage to the powerful
effect of the choir, but it also gave great precision and energy to the finely
organised orchestra in the purely symphonic movements.
Even at the general rehearsal the hall was overcrowded. Reissiger was
guilty of the incredible stupidity of working up the public mind against the
symphony and drawing attention to Beethoven’s very regrettable error.
Gade, on the other hand, who came to visit us from Leipzig, where he was
then conducting the Gewandhaus Concerts, assured me after the general
rehearsal, that he would willingly have paid double the price of his ticket in
order to hear the recitative by the basses once more; whilst Hiller
considered that I had gone too far in my modification of the tempo. What he
meant by this I learned subsequently when I heard him conducting intricate
orchestral works; but of this I shall have more to say later on.
There was no denying that the performance was, on the whole, a success;
in fact, it exceeded all our expectations, and was particularly well received
by the non-musical public. Among these I remember the philologist Dr.
Kochly, who came to me at the end of the evening and confessed that it was
the first time he had been able to follow a symphonic work from beginning
to end with intelligent interest. This experience left me with a pleasant
feeling of ability and power, and strongly confirmed me in the belief, that if
I only desired anything with sufficient earnestness, I was able to achieve it
with irresistible and overwhelming success. I now had to consider, however,
what the difficulties were, which hitherto had prevented a similarly happy
production of my own new conceptions. Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony,
which was still such a problem to so many, and had, at all events, never
attained to popularity, I had been able to make a complete success; yet, as
passage might almost be considered impossible to perform, and yet he
executed it in a way which showed what fruit our mutual interchange of
ideas had borne. I also took care that, by means of the complete
reconstruction of the hall, I should obtain good acoustic conditions for the
orchestra, which I had arranged according to quite a new system of my
own. As may be imagined, it was only with the greatest difficulty that the
money for this could be found; however, I did not give up, and owing to a
totally new construction of the platform, I was able to concentrate the whole
of the orchestra towards the centre, and surround it, in amphitheatre
fashion, by the throng of singers who were accommodated on seats very
considerably raised. This was not only of great advantage to the powerful
effect of the choir, but it also gave great precision and energy to the finely
organised orchestra in the purely symphonic movements.
Even at the general rehearsal the hall was overcrowded. Reissiger was
guilty of the incredible stupidity of working up the public mind against the
symphony and drawing attention to Beethoven’s very regrettable error.
Gade, on the other hand, who came to visit us from Leipzig, where he was
then conducting the Gewandhaus Concerts, assured me after the general
rehearsal, that he would willingly have paid double the price of his ticket in
order to hear the recitative by the basses once more; whilst Hiller
considered that I had gone too far in my modification of the tempo. What he
meant by this I learned subsequently when I heard him conducting intricate
orchestral works; but of this I shall have more to say later on.
There was no denying that the performance was, on the whole, a success;
in fact, it exceeded all our expectations, and was particularly well received
by the non-musical public. Among these I remember the philologist Dr.
Kochly, who came to me at the end of the evening and confessed that it was
the first time he had been able to follow a symphonic work from beginning
to end with intelligent interest. This experience left me with a pleasant
feeling of ability and power, and strongly confirmed me in the belief, that if
I only desired anything with sufficient earnestness, I was able to achieve it
with irresistible and overwhelming success. I now had to consider, however,
what the difficulties were, which hitherto had prevented a similarly happy
production of my own new conceptions. Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony,
which was still such a problem to so many, and had, at all events, never
attained to popularity, I had been able to make a complete success; yet, as
Page 368
often as it was put on the stage, my Tannhäuser taught me that the
possibilities of its success had yet to be discovered. How was this to be
done? This was and remained the secret question which influenced all my
subsequent development.
I dared not, however, indulge at that time in any meditation on this point
with the view of arriving at any particular results, for the real significance
of my failure, of which I was inwardly convinced, stood absolutely bare
before me with all its terrifying lessons. Albeit, I could no longer delay
taking even the most disagreeable steps with the view of warding off the
catastrophe which menaced my financial position.
I was led to this, thanks to the influence of a ridiculous omen. My agent,
the purely nominal publisher of my three operas—Rienzi, the Fliegender
Holländer, and Tannhäuser—the eccentric court music publisher, C. F.
Meser, invited me one day to the cafe known as the ‘Verderber’ to discuss
our money affairs. With great qualms we talked over the possible results of
the Annual Easter Fair, and wondered whether they would be tolerably good
or altogether bad. I gave him courage, and ordered a bottle of the best Haut-
Sauterne. A venerable flask made its appearance; I filled the glasses, and we
drank to the good success of the Fair; when suddenly we both yelled as
though we had gone mad, while, with horror, we tried to rid our mouths of
the strong Tarragon vinegar with which we had been served by mistake.
‘Heavens!’ cried Meser, ‘nothing could be worse!’ ‘True enough,’ I
answered, ‘no doubt there is much that will turn to vinegar for us.’ My
good-humour revealed to me in a flash that I must try some other way of
saving myself than by means of the Easter Fair.
Not only was it necessary to refund the capital which had been got
together by dint of ever-increasing sacrifices, in order to defray the
expenses of the publication of my operas; but, owing to the fact that I had
been obliged ultimately to seek aid from the usurers, the rumour of my
debts had spread so far abroad, that even those friends who had helped me
at the time of my arrival in Dresden were seized with anxiety on my
account. At this time I met with a really sad experience at the hands of
Madame Schroder-Devrient, who, as the result of her incomprehensible
lack of discretion, did much to bring about my final undoing. When I first
settled in Dresden, as I have already pointed out, she lent me three thousand
marks, not only to help me to discharge my debts, but also to allow me to
possibilities of its success had yet to be discovered. How was this to be
done? This was and remained the secret question which influenced all my
subsequent development.
I dared not, however, indulge at that time in any meditation on this point
with the view of arriving at any particular results, for the real significance
of my failure, of which I was inwardly convinced, stood absolutely bare
before me with all its terrifying lessons. Albeit, I could no longer delay
taking even the most disagreeable steps with the view of warding off the
catastrophe which menaced my financial position.
I was led to this, thanks to the influence of a ridiculous omen. My agent,
the purely nominal publisher of my three operas—Rienzi, the Fliegender
Holländer, and Tannhäuser—the eccentric court music publisher, C. F.
Meser, invited me one day to the cafe known as the ‘Verderber’ to discuss
our money affairs. With great qualms we talked over the possible results of
the Annual Easter Fair, and wondered whether they would be tolerably good
or altogether bad. I gave him courage, and ordered a bottle of the best Haut-
Sauterne. A venerable flask made its appearance; I filled the glasses, and we
drank to the good success of the Fair; when suddenly we both yelled as
though we had gone mad, while, with horror, we tried to rid our mouths of
the strong Tarragon vinegar with which we had been served by mistake.
‘Heavens!’ cried Meser, ‘nothing could be worse!’ ‘True enough,’ I
answered, ‘no doubt there is much that will turn to vinegar for us.’ My
good-humour revealed to me in a flash that I must try some other way of
saving myself than by means of the Easter Fair.
Not only was it necessary to refund the capital which had been got
together by dint of ever-increasing sacrifices, in order to defray the
expenses of the publication of my operas; but, owing to the fact that I had
been obliged ultimately to seek aid from the usurers, the rumour of my
debts had spread so far abroad, that even those friends who had helped me
at the time of my arrival in Dresden were seized with anxiety on my
account. At this time I met with a really sad experience at the hands of
Madame Schroder-Devrient, who, as the result of her incomprehensible
lack of discretion, did much to bring about my final undoing. When I first
settled in Dresden, as I have already pointed out, she lent me three thousand
marks, not only to help me to discharge my debts, but also to allow me to
Page 369
contribute to the maintenance of my old friend Kietz in Paris. Jealousy of
my niece Johanna, and suspicion that I had made her (my niece) come to
Dresden in order to make it easier for the general management to dispense
with the services of the great artist, had awakened in this otherwise so
noble-minded woman the usual feelings of animosity towards me, which
are so often met with in the theatrical profession. She had now given up her
engagement; she even declared openly that I had been partly instrumental in
obtaining her dismissal; and abandoning all friendly regard for me, whereby
she deeply wronged me in every respect, she placed the I.O.U. I had given
her in the hands of an energetic lawyer, and without further ado this man
sued me for the payment of the money. Thus I was forced to make a clean
breast of everything to Lüttichau, and to beseech him to intervene for me,
and if possible to obtain a royal advance that would enable me to clear my
position, which was so seriously compromised.
My principal declared himself willing to support any request I might
wish to address to the King on this matter. To this end I had to note down
the amount of my debts; but as I soon discovered that the necessary sum
could only be assigned to me as a loan from the Theatre Pension Fund, at an
interest of five per cent., and that I should moreover have to secure the
capital of the Pension Fund by a life insurance policy, which would cost me
annually three per cent, of the capital borrowed, I was, for obvious reasons,
tempted to leave out of my petition all those of my debts which were not of
a pressing nature, and for the payment of which I thought I could count on
the receipts which I might finally expect from my publishing enterprises.
Nevertheless, the sacrifices I had to make in order to repay the help offered
me increased to such an extent, that my salary of conductor, in itself very
slender, promised to be materially diminished for some time to come. I was
forced to make the most irksome efforts to gather together the necessary
sum for the life insurance policy, and was therefore obliged frequently to
appeal to Leipzig. In addition to this, I had to overcome the most appalling
doubts in regard both to my health and to the probable length of my life,
concerning which I fancied I had heard all sorts of malicious apprehensions
expressed by those who had observed me but casually in the miserable
condition which I was in at that time. My friend Pusinelli, as a doctor who
was very intimate with me, eventually managed to give such satisfactory
information concerning the state of my health, that I succeeded in insuring
my life at the rate of three per cent.
my niece Johanna, and suspicion that I had made her (my niece) come to
Dresden in order to make it easier for the general management to dispense
with the services of the great artist, had awakened in this otherwise so
noble-minded woman the usual feelings of animosity towards me, which
are so often met with in the theatrical profession. She had now given up her
engagement; she even declared openly that I had been partly instrumental in
obtaining her dismissal; and abandoning all friendly regard for me, whereby
she deeply wronged me in every respect, she placed the I.O.U. I had given
her in the hands of an energetic lawyer, and without further ado this man
sued me for the payment of the money. Thus I was forced to make a clean
breast of everything to Lüttichau, and to beseech him to intervene for me,
and if possible to obtain a royal advance that would enable me to clear my
position, which was so seriously compromised.
My principal declared himself willing to support any request I might
wish to address to the King on this matter. To this end I had to note down
the amount of my debts; but as I soon discovered that the necessary sum
could only be assigned to me as a loan from the Theatre Pension Fund, at an
interest of five per cent., and that I should moreover have to secure the
capital of the Pension Fund by a life insurance policy, which would cost me
annually three per cent, of the capital borrowed, I was, for obvious reasons,
tempted to leave out of my petition all those of my debts which were not of
a pressing nature, and for the payment of which I thought I could count on
the receipts which I might finally expect from my publishing enterprises.
Nevertheless, the sacrifices I had to make in order to repay the help offered
me increased to such an extent, that my salary of conductor, in itself very
slender, promised to be materially diminished for some time to come. I was
forced to make the most irksome efforts to gather together the necessary
sum for the life insurance policy, and was therefore obliged frequently to
appeal to Leipzig. In addition to this, I had to overcome the most appalling
doubts in regard both to my health and to the probable length of my life,
concerning which I fancied I had heard all sorts of malicious apprehensions
expressed by those who had observed me but casually in the miserable
condition which I was in at that time. My friend Pusinelli, as a doctor who
was very intimate with me, eventually managed to give such satisfactory
information concerning the state of my health, that I succeeded in insuring
my life at the rate of three per cent.
Page 370
The last of these painful journeys to Leipzig was, at all events, made
under pleasant circumstances owing to a kind invitation from the old
Maestro Louis Spohr. I was particularly pleased over this, because to me it
meant nothing less than an act of reconciliation. As a matter of fact, Spohr
had written to me on one occasion, and had declared that, stimulated by the
success of my Fliegender Holländer and his own enjoyment of it, he had
once more decided to take up the career of a dramatic composer, which of
recent years had brought him such scant success. His last work was an
opera—Die Kreuz-fahrer—which he had sent to the Dresden theatre in the
course of the preceding year in the hope, as he himself assured me, that I
would urge on its production. After asking this favour, he drew my attention
to the fact that in this work he had made an absolutely new departure from
his earlier operas, and had kept to the most precise rhythmically dramatic
declamation, which had certainly been made all the more easy for him by
the ‘excellent subject.’ Without being actually surprised, my horror was
indeed great when, after studying not only the text, but also the score, I
discovered that the old maestro had been absolutely mistaken in regard to
the account he had given me of his work. The custom in force at that time
that the decision concerning the production of works should not, as a rule,
rest with one of the conductors alone, did not tend to make me any less
fearful of declaring myself emphatically in favour of this work. In addition
to this, it was Reissiger, who, as he had often boasted, was an old friend of
Spohr’s, whose turn it was to select and produce a new work.
Unfortunately, as I learned later, the general management had returned
Spohr’s opera to its author in such a curt manner as to offend him, and he
complained bitterly of this to me. Genuinely concerned at this, I had
evidently managed to calm and appease him, for the invitation mentioned
above was clearly a friendly acknowledgment of my efforts. He wrote that
it was very painful for him to have to touch at Dresden on his way to one of
the watering-places; as, however, he had a real longing to make my
acquaintance, he begged me to meet him in Leipzig, where he was going to
stay for a few days.
This meeting with him did not leave me unimpressed. He was a tall,
stately man, distinguished in appearance, and of a serious and calm
temperament. He gave me to understand, in a touching, almost apologetic
manner, that the essence of his education and of his aversion from the new
tendencies in music, had its origin in the first impressions he had received
under pleasant circumstances owing to a kind invitation from the old
Maestro Louis Spohr. I was particularly pleased over this, because to me it
meant nothing less than an act of reconciliation. As a matter of fact, Spohr
had written to me on one occasion, and had declared that, stimulated by the
success of my Fliegender Holländer and his own enjoyment of it, he had
once more decided to take up the career of a dramatic composer, which of
recent years had brought him such scant success. His last work was an
opera—Die Kreuz-fahrer—which he had sent to the Dresden theatre in the
course of the preceding year in the hope, as he himself assured me, that I
would urge on its production. After asking this favour, he drew my attention
to the fact that in this work he had made an absolutely new departure from
his earlier operas, and had kept to the most precise rhythmically dramatic
declamation, which had certainly been made all the more easy for him by
the ‘excellent subject.’ Without being actually surprised, my horror was
indeed great when, after studying not only the text, but also the score, I
discovered that the old maestro had been absolutely mistaken in regard to
the account he had given me of his work. The custom in force at that time
that the decision concerning the production of works should not, as a rule,
rest with one of the conductors alone, did not tend to make me any less
fearful of declaring myself emphatically in favour of this work. In addition
to this, it was Reissiger, who, as he had often boasted, was an old friend of
Spohr’s, whose turn it was to select and produce a new work.
Unfortunately, as I learned later, the general management had returned
Spohr’s opera to its author in such a curt manner as to offend him, and he
complained bitterly of this to me. Genuinely concerned at this, I had
evidently managed to calm and appease him, for the invitation mentioned
above was clearly a friendly acknowledgment of my efforts. He wrote that
it was very painful for him to have to touch at Dresden on his way to one of
the watering-places; as, however, he had a real longing to make my
acquaintance, he begged me to meet him in Leipzig, where he was going to
stay for a few days.
This meeting with him did not leave me unimpressed. He was a tall,
stately man, distinguished in appearance, and of a serious and calm
temperament. He gave me to understand, in a touching, almost apologetic
manner, that the essence of his education and of his aversion from the new
tendencies in music, had its origin in the first impressions he had received
Page 371
on hearing, as a very young boy, Mozart’s Magic Flute, a work which was
quite new at that time, and which had a great influence on his whole life.
Regarding my libretto to Lohengrin, which I had left behind for him to read,
and the general impression which my personal acquaintance had made on
him, he expressed himself with almost surprising warmth to my brother-in-
law, Hermann Brockhaus, at whose house we had been invited to dine, and
where, during the meal, the conversation was most animated. Besides this,
we had met at real musical evenings at the conductor Hauptmann’s as well
as at Mendelssohn’s, on which occasion I heard the master take the violin in
one of his own quartettes. It was precisely in these circles that I was
impressed by the touching and venerable dignity of his absolutely calm
demeanour. Later on, I learned from witnesses—for whose testimony, be it
said, I cannot vouch—that Tannhäuser, when it was performed at Cassel,
had caused him so much confusion and pain that he declared he could no
longer follow me, and feared that I must be on the wrong road.
In order to recover from all the hardships and cares I had gone through, I
now managed to obtain a special favour from the management, in the form
of a three months’ leave, in which to improve my health in rustic retirement,
and to get pure air to breathe while composing some new work. To this end
I had chosen a peasant’s house in the village of Gross-Graupen, which is
half-way between Pillnitz and the border of what is known as ‘Saxon
Switzerland.’ Frequent excursions to the Porsberg, to the adjacent
Liebethaler, and to the far distant bastion helped to strengthen my unstrung
nerves. While I was first planning the music to Lohengrin, I was disturbed
incessantly by the echoes of some of the airs in Rossini’s William Tell,
which was the last opera I had had to conduct. At last I happened to hit on
an effective means of stopping this annoying obtrusion: during my lonely
walks I sang with great emphasis the first theme from the Ninth Symphony,
which had also quite lately been revived in my memory. This succeeded! At
Pirna, where one can bathe in the river, I was surprised, on one of my
almost regular evening constitutionals, to hear the air from the Pilgrim’s
Chorus out of Tannhäuser whistled by some bather, who was invisible to
me. This first sign of the possibility of popularising the work, which I had
with such difficulty succeeded in getting performed in Dresden, made an
impression on me which no similar experience later on has ever been able
to surpass. Sometimes I received visits from friends in Dresden, and among
them Hans von Bulow, who was then sixteen years old, came accompanied
quite new at that time, and which had a great influence on his whole life.
Regarding my libretto to Lohengrin, which I had left behind for him to read,
and the general impression which my personal acquaintance had made on
him, he expressed himself with almost surprising warmth to my brother-in-
law, Hermann Brockhaus, at whose house we had been invited to dine, and
where, during the meal, the conversation was most animated. Besides this,
we had met at real musical evenings at the conductor Hauptmann’s as well
as at Mendelssohn’s, on which occasion I heard the master take the violin in
one of his own quartettes. It was precisely in these circles that I was
impressed by the touching and venerable dignity of his absolutely calm
demeanour. Later on, I learned from witnesses—for whose testimony, be it
said, I cannot vouch—that Tannhäuser, when it was performed at Cassel,
had caused him so much confusion and pain that he declared he could no
longer follow me, and feared that I must be on the wrong road.
In order to recover from all the hardships and cares I had gone through, I
now managed to obtain a special favour from the management, in the form
of a three months’ leave, in which to improve my health in rustic retirement,
and to get pure air to breathe while composing some new work. To this end
I had chosen a peasant’s house in the village of Gross-Graupen, which is
half-way between Pillnitz and the border of what is known as ‘Saxon
Switzerland.’ Frequent excursions to the Porsberg, to the adjacent
Liebethaler, and to the far distant bastion helped to strengthen my unstrung
nerves. While I was first planning the music to Lohengrin, I was disturbed
incessantly by the echoes of some of the airs in Rossini’s William Tell,
which was the last opera I had had to conduct. At last I happened to hit on
an effective means of stopping this annoying obtrusion: during my lonely
walks I sang with great emphasis the first theme from the Ninth Symphony,
which had also quite lately been revived in my memory. This succeeded! At
Pirna, where one can bathe in the river, I was surprised, on one of my
almost regular evening constitutionals, to hear the air from the Pilgrim’s
Chorus out of Tannhäuser whistled by some bather, who was invisible to
me. This first sign of the possibility of popularising the work, which I had
with such difficulty succeeded in getting performed in Dresden, made an
impression on me which no similar experience later on has ever been able
to surpass. Sometimes I received visits from friends in Dresden, and among
them Hans von Bulow, who was then sixteen years old, came accompanied
Page 372
by Lipinsky. This gave me great pleasure, because I had already noticed the
interest which he took in me. Generally, however, I had to rely only on my
wife’s company, and during my long walks I had to be satisfied with my
little dog Peps. During this summer holiday, of which a great part of the
time had at the beginning to be devoted to the unpleasant task of arranging
my business affairs, and also to the improvement of my health, I
nevertheless succeeded in making a sketch of the music to the whole of the
three acts of Lohengrin, although this cannot be said to have consisted of
anything more than a very hasty outline.
With this much gained, I returned in August to Dresden, and resumed my
duties as conductor, which every year seemed to become more and more
burdensome to me. Moreover, I immediately plunged once more into the
midst of troubles which had only just been temporarily allayed. The
business of publishing my operas, on the success of which I still counted as
the only means of liberating me from my difficult position, demanded ever-
fresh sacrifices if the enterprise were to be made worth while. But as my
income was now very much reduced, even the smallest outlays necessarily
led me into ever-new and more painful complications; and I once more lost
all courage.
On the other hand, I tried to strengthen myself by again working
energetically at Lohengrin. While doing this, I proceeded in a manner that I
have not since repeated. I first of all completed the third act, and in view of
the criticism already mentioned of the characters and conclusion of this act,
I determined to try to make it the very pivot of the whole opera. I wished to
do this, if only for the sake of the musical motive appearing in the story of
the Holy Grail; but in other respects the plan struck me as perfectly
satisfactory.
Owing to previous suggestions on my part, Gluck’s Iphigenia in Aulis
was to be produced this winter. I felt it my duty to give more care and
attention to this work, which interested me particularly on account of its
subject, than I had given to the study of the Armida. In the first place, I was
upset by the translation in which the opera with the Berlin score was
presented to us. In order not to be led into false interpretations through the
instrumental additions which I considered very badly applied in this score, I
wrote for the original edition from Paris. When I had made a thorough
revision of the translation, with a view merely to the correctness of
interest which he took in me. Generally, however, I had to rely only on my
wife’s company, and during my long walks I had to be satisfied with my
little dog Peps. During this summer holiday, of which a great part of the
time had at the beginning to be devoted to the unpleasant task of arranging
my business affairs, and also to the improvement of my health, I
nevertheless succeeded in making a sketch of the music to the whole of the
three acts of Lohengrin, although this cannot be said to have consisted of
anything more than a very hasty outline.
With this much gained, I returned in August to Dresden, and resumed my
duties as conductor, which every year seemed to become more and more
burdensome to me. Moreover, I immediately plunged once more into the
midst of troubles which had only just been temporarily allayed. The
business of publishing my operas, on the success of which I still counted as
the only means of liberating me from my difficult position, demanded ever-
fresh sacrifices if the enterprise were to be made worth while. But as my
income was now very much reduced, even the smallest outlays necessarily
led me into ever-new and more painful complications; and I once more lost
all courage.
On the other hand, I tried to strengthen myself by again working
energetically at Lohengrin. While doing this, I proceeded in a manner that I
have not since repeated. I first of all completed the third act, and in view of
the criticism already mentioned of the characters and conclusion of this act,
I determined to try to make it the very pivot of the whole opera. I wished to
do this, if only for the sake of the musical motive appearing in the story of
the Holy Grail; but in other respects the plan struck me as perfectly
satisfactory.
Owing to previous suggestions on my part, Gluck’s Iphigenia in Aulis
was to be produced this winter. I felt it my duty to give more care and
attention to this work, which interested me particularly on account of its
subject, than I had given to the study of the Armida. In the first place, I was
upset by the translation in which the opera with the Berlin score was
presented to us. In order not to be led into false interpretations through the
instrumental additions which I considered very badly applied in this score, I
wrote for the original edition from Paris. When I had made a thorough
revision of the translation, with a view merely to the correctness of
Page 373
declamation, I was spurred on by my increasing interest to revise the score
itself. I tried to bring the poem as far as possible into agreement with
Euripides’ play of the same name, by the elimination of everything which,
in deference to French taste, made the relationship between Achilles and
Iphigenia one of tender love. The chief alteration of all was to cut out the
inevitable marriage at the end. For the sake of the vitality of the drama I
tried to join the arias and choruses, which generally followed immediately
upon each other without rhyme or reason, by connecting links, prologues
and epilogues. In this I did my best, by the use of Gluck’s themes, to make
the interpolations of a strange composer as unnoticeable as possible. In the
third act alone was I obliged to give Iphigenia, as well as Artemis, whom I
had myself introduced, recitatives of my own composition. Throughout the
rest of the work I revised the whole instrumentation more or less
thoroughly, but only with the object of making the existing version produce
the effect I desired. It was not till the end of the year that I was able to
finish this tremendous task, and I had to postpone the completion of the
third act of Lohengrin, which I had already begun, until the New Year.
The first thing to claim my attention at the beginning of the year (1847)
was the production of Iphigenia. I had to act as stage manager in this case,
and was even obliged to help the scene-painters and the mechanicians over
the smallest details. Owing to the fact that the scenes in this opera were
generally strung together somewhat clumsily and without any apparent
connection, it was necessary to recast them completely, in order so to
animate the representation as to give to the dramatic action the life it
lacked. A good deal of this faultiness of construction seemed to me due to
the many conventional practices which were prevalent at the Paris Opera in
Gluck’s time. Mitterwurzer was the only actor in the whole cast who gave
me any pleasure. In the role of Agamemnon he showed a thorough grasp of
that character, and carried out my instructions and suggestions to the letter,
so that he succeeded in giving a really splendid and intelligent rendering of
the part. The success of the whole performance was far beyond my
expectations, and even the directors were so surprised at the exceptional
enthusiasm aroused by one of Gluck’s operas, that for the second
performance they, on their own initiative, had my name put on the
programme as ‘Reviser.’ This at once drew the attention of the critics to this
work, and for once they almost did me justice; my treatment of the overture,
the only part of the opera which these gentlemen heard rendered in the
itself. I tried to bring the poem as far as possible into agreement with
Euripides’ play of the same name, by the elimination of everything which,
in deference to French taste, made the relationship between Achilles and
Iphigenia one of tender love. The chief alteration of all was to cut out the
inevitable marriage at the end. For the sake of the vitality of the drama I
tried to join the arias and choruses, which generally followed immediately
upon each other without rhyme or reason, by connecting links, prologues
and epilogues. In this I did my best, by the use of Gluck’s themes, to make
the interpolations of a strange composer as unnoticeable as possible. In the
third act alone was I obliged to give Iphigenia, as well as Artemis, whom I
had myself introduced, recitatives of my own composition. Throughout the
rest of the work I revised the whole instrumentation more or less
thoroughly, but only with the object of making the existing version produce
the effect I desired. It was not till the end of the year that I was able to
finish this tremendous task, and I had to postpone the completion of the
third act of Lohengrin, which I had already begun, until the New Year.
The first thing to claim my attention at the beginning of the year (1847)
was the production of Iphigenia. I had to act as stage manager in this case,
and was even obliged to help the scene-painters and the mechanicians over
the smallest details. Owing to the fact that the scenes in this opera were
generally strung together somewhat clumsily and without any apparent
connection, it was necessary to recast them completely, in order so to
animate the representation as to give to the dramatic action the life it
lacked. A good deal of this faultiness of construction seemed to me due to
the many conventional practices which were prevalent at the Paris Opera in
Gluck’s time. Mitterwurzer was the only actor in the whole cast who gave
me any pleasure. In the role of Agamemnon he showed a thorough grasp of
that character, and carried out my instructions and suggestions to the letter,
so that he succeeded in giving a really splendid and intelligent rendering of
the part. The success of the whole performance was far beyond my
expectations, and even the directors were so surprised at the exceptional
enthusiasm aroused by one of Gluck’s operas, that for the second
performance they, on their own initiative, had my name put on the
programme as ‘Reviser.’ This at once drew the attention of the critics to this
work, and for once they almost did me justice; my treatment of the overture,
the only part of the opera which these gentlemen heard rendered in the
Page 374
usual trivial way, was the only thing that they could find fault with. I have
discussed and given an accurate account of all that relates to this in a
special article on ‘Gluck’s Overture to Iphigenia in Aulis’ and I only wish to
add here that the musician who made such strange comments on this
occasion was Ferdinand Hiller.
As in former years, the winter meetings of the various artistic elements in
Dresden which Hiller had inaugurated, continued to take place; but they
now assumed more the character of ‘salons’ in Hiller’s own house, and it
seemed to me intended solely for the purpose of laying the foundations for a
general recognition of Hiller’s artistic greatness. He had already founded,
among the more wealthy patrons of art, the chief of whom was the banker
Kaskel, a society for running subscription concerts. As it was impossible for
the royal orchestra to be placed at his disposal for this purpose, he had to
content himself with members of the town and military bands for his
orchestra, and it cannot be denied that, thanks to his perseverance, he
attained a praiseworthy result. As he produced many compositions which
were still unknown in Dresden, especially from the domain of more modern
music, I was often tempted to go to his concerts. His chief bait to the
general public, however, seemed to lie in the fact that he presented
unknown singers (among whom, unfortunately, Jenny Lind was not to be
found) and virtuosos, one of which, Joachim, who was then very young, I
became acquainted with.
Hiller’s treatment of those works with which I was already well
acquainted, showed what his musical power was really worth. The careless
and indifferent manner in which he interpreted a Triple Concerto by
Sebastian Bach positively astounded me. In the tempo di minuetto of the
Eighth Symphony of Beethoven, I found that Hiller’s rendering was even
more astonishing than Reissiger’s and Mendelssohn’s. I promised to be
present at the performance of this symphony if I could rely on his giving a
correct rendering of the tempo of the third phrase, which was generally so
painfully distorted, He assured me that he thoroughly agreed with me about
it, and my disappointment at the performance was all the greater when I
found the well-known waltz measure adopted again. When I called him to
account about it he excused himself with a smile, saying that he had been
seized with a fit of temporary abstraction just at the beginning of the phrase
in question, which had made him forget his promise. For inaugurating these
discussed and given an accurate account of all that relates to this in a
special article on ‘Gluck’s Overture to Iphigenia in Aulis’ and I only wish to
add here that the musician who made such strange comments on this
occasion was Ferdinand Hiller.
As in former years, the winter meetings of the various artistic elements in
Dresden which Hiller had inaugurated, continued to take place; but they
now assumed more the character of ‘salons’ in Hiller’s own house, and it
seemed to me intended solely for the purpose of laying the foundations for a
general recognition of Hiller’s artistic greatness. He had already founded,
among the more wealthy patrons of art, the chief of whom was the banker
Kaskel, a society for running subscription concerts. As it was impossible for
the royal orchestra to be placed at his disposal for this purpose, he had to
content himself with members of the town and military bands for his
orchestra, and it cannot be denied that, thanks to his perseverance, he
attained a praiseworthy result. As he produced many compositions which
were still unknown in Dresden, especially from the domain of more modern
music, I was often tempted to go to his concerts. His chief bait to the
general public, however, seemed to lie in the fact that he presented
unknown singers (among whom, unfortunately, Jenny Lind was not to be
found) and virtuosos, one of which, Joachim, who was then very young, I
became acquainted with.
Hiller’s treatment of those works with which I was already well
acquainted, showed what his musical power was really worth. The careless
and indifferent manner in which he interpreted a Triple Concerto by
Sebastian Bach positively astounded me. In the tempo di minuetto of the
Eighth Symphony of Beethoven, I found that Hiller’s rendering was even
more astonishing than Reissiger’s and Mendelssohn’s. I promised to be
present at the performance of this symphony if I could rely on his giving a
correct rendering of the tempo of the third phrase, which was generally so
painfully distorted, He assured me that he thoroughly agreed with me about
it, and my disappointment at the performance was all the greater when I
found the well-known waltz measure adopted again. When I called him to
account about it he excused himself with a smile, saying that he had been
seized with a fit of temporary abstraction just at the beginning of the phrase
in question, which had made him forget his promise. For inaugurating these
Page 375
concerts, which, as a matter of fact, only lasted for two seasons, Hiller was
given a banquet, which I also had much pleasure in attending.
People in these circles were surprised at that time to hear me speak, often
with great animation, about Greek literature and history, but never about
music. In the course of my reading, which I zealously pursued, and which
drew me away from my professional activities to retirement and solitude, I
was at that time impelled by my spiritual needs to turn my attention once
more to a systematic study of this all-important source of culture, with the
object of filling the perceptible gap between my boyhood’s knowledge of
the eternal elements of human culture and the neglect of this field of
learning due to the life I had been obliged to lead. In order to approach the
real goal of my desires—the study of Old and Middle High German—in the
right frame of mind, I began again from the beginning with Greek antiquity,
and was now filled with such overwhelming enthusiasm for this subject
that, whenever I entered into conversation, and by hook or by crook had
managed to get it round to this theme, I could only speak in terms of the
strongest emotion. I occasionally met some one who seemed to listen to
what I had to say; on the whole, however, people preferred to talk to me
only about the theatre because, since my production of Gluck’s Iphigenia,
they thought themselves justified in thinking I was an authority on this
subject. I received special recognition from a man to whom I quite rightly
gave the credit of being at least as well versed as myself in the matter. This
was Eduard Devrient, who had been forced at that time to resign his
position as stage manager-in-chief owing to a plot against him on the part of
the actors, headed by his own brother Emil. We were brought into closer
sympathy by our conversations in connection with this, which led him into
dissertations on the triviality and thorough hopelessness of our whole
theatrical life, especially under the ruining influence of ignorant court
managers, which could never be overcome.
We were also drawn together by his intelligent understanding of the part I
had played in the production of Iphigenia, which he compared with the
Berlin production of the same piece, that had been utterly condemned by
him. He was for a long time the only man with whom I could discuss,
seriously and in detail, the real needs of the theatre and the means by which
its defects might be remedied. Owing to his longer and more specialised
experience, there was much he could tell me and make clear to me; in
particular he helped me successfully to overcome the idea that mere literary
given a banquet, which I also had much pleasure in attending.
People in these circles were surprised at that time to hear me speak, often
with great animation, about Greek literature and history, but never about
music. In the course of my reading, which I zealously pursued, and which
drew me away from my professional activities to retirement and solitude, I
was at that time impelled by my spiritual needs to turn my attention once
more to a systematic study of this all-important source of culture, with the
object of filling the perceptible gap between my boyhood’s knowledge of
the eternal elements of human culture and the neglect of this field of
learning due to the life I had been obliged to lead. In order to approach the
real goal of my desires—the study of Old and Middle High German—in the
right frame of mind, I began again from the beginning with Greek antiquity,
and was now filled with such overwhelming enthusiasm for this subject
that, whenever I entered into conversation, and by hook or by crook had
managed to get it round to this theme, I could only speak in terms of the
strongest emotion. I occasionally met some one who seemed to listen to
what I had to say; on the whole, however, people preferred to talk to me
only about the theatre because, since my production of Gluck’s Iphigenia,
they thought themselves justified in thinking I was an authority on this
subject. I received special recognition from a man to whom I quite rightly
gave the credit of being at least as well versed as myself in the matter. This
was Eduard Devrient, who had been forced at that time to resign his
position as stage manager-in-chief owing to a plot against him on the part of
the actors, headed by his own brother Emil. We were brought into closer
sympathy by our conversations in connection with this, which led him into
dissertations on the triviality and thorough hopelessness of our whole
theatrical life, especially under the ruining influence of ignorant court
managers, which could never be overcome.
We were also drawn together by his intelligent understanding of the part I
had played in the production of Iphigenia, which he compared with the
Berlin production of the same piece, that had been utterly condemned by
him. He was for a long time the only man with whom I could discuss,
seriously and in detail, the real needs of the theatre and the means by which
its defects might be remedied. Owing to his longer and more specialised
experience, there was much he could tell me and make clear to me; in
particular he helped me successfully to overcome the idea that mere literary
Page 376
excellence is enough for the theatre, and confirmed my conviction that the
path to true prosperity lay only with the stage itself and with the actors of
the drama.
From this time forward, till I left Dresden, my intercourse with Eduard
Devrient grew more and more friendly, though his dry nature and obvious
limitations as an actor had attracted me but little before. His highly
meritorious work, Die Geschichte der deutschen Schauspielkunst (‘History
of German Dramatic Art’), which he finished and published about that time,
threw a fresh and instructive light on many problems which exercised my
mind, and helped me to master them for the first time.
At last I managed once more to resume my task of composing the third
act of Lohengrin, which had been interrupted in the middle of the Bridal
Scene, and I finished it by the end of the winter. After the repetition, by
special request, of the Ninth Symphony at the concert on Palm Sunday had
revived me, I tried to find comfort and refreshment for the further progress
of my new work by changing my abode, this time without asking
permission. The old Marcolini palace, with a very large garden laid out
partly in the French style, was situated in an outlying and thinly populated
suburb of Dresden.
It had been sold to the town council, and a part of it was to be let. The
sculptor, Hänel, whom I had known for a long time, and who had given me
as a mark of friendship an ornament in the shape of a perfect plaster cast of
one of the bas-reliefs from Beethoven’s monument representing the Ninth
Symphony, had taken the large rooms on the ground floor of a side-wing of
this palace for his dwelling and studio. At Easter I moved into the spacious
apartments, above him, the rent of which was extremely low, and found that
the large garden planted with glorious trees, which was placed at my
disposal, and the pleasant stillness of the whole place, not only provided
mental food for the weary artist, but at the same time, by lessening my
expenses, improved my straitened finances. We soon settled down quite
comfortably in the long row of pleasant rooms without having incurred any
unnecessary expense, as Minna was very practical in her arrangements. The
only real inconvenience which in the course of time I found our new home
possessed, was its inordinate distance from the theatre. This was a great trial
to me after fatiguing rehearsals and tiring performances, as the expense of a
cab was a serious consideration. But we were favoured by an exceptionally
path to true prosperity lay only with the stage itself and with the actors of
the drama.
From this time forward, till I left Dresden, my intercourse with Eduard
Devrient grew more and more friendly, though his dry nature and obvious
limitations as an actor had attracted me but little before. His highly
meritorious work, Die Geschichte der deutschen Schauspielkunst (‘History
of German Dramatic Art’), which he finished and published about that time,
threw a fresh and instructive light on many problems which exercised my
mind, and helped me to master them for the first time.
At last I managed once more to resume my task of composing the third
act of Lohengrin, which had been interrupted in the middle of the Bridal
Scene, and I finished it by the end of the winter. After the repetition, by
special request, of the Ninth Symphony at the concert on Palm Sunday had
revived me, I tried to find comfort and refreshment for the further progress
of my new work by changing my abode, this time without asking
permission. The old Marcolini palace, with a very large garden laid out
partly in the French style, was situated in an outlying and thinly populated
suburb of Dresden.
It had been sold to the town council, and a part of it was to be let. The
sculptor, Hänel, whom I had known for a long time, and who had given me
as a mark of friendship an ornament in the shape of a perfect plaster cast of
one of the bas-reliefs from Beethoven’s monument representing the Ninth
Symphony, had taken the large rooms on the ground floor of a side-wing of
this palace for his dwelling and studio. At Easter I moved into the spacious
apartments, above him, the rent of which was extremely low, and found that
the large garden planted with glorious trees, which was placed at my
disposal, and the pleasant stillness of the whole place, not only provided
mental food for the weary artist, but at the same time, by lessening my
expenses, improved my straitened finances. We soon settled down quite
comfortably in the long row of pleasant rooms without having incurred any
unnecessary expense, as Minna was very practical in her arrangements. The
only real inconvenience which in the course of time I found our new home
possessed, was its inordinate distance from the theatre. This was a great trial
to me after fatiguing rehearsals and tiring performances, as the expense of a
cab was a serious consideration. But we were favoured by an exceptionally
Page 377
fine summer, which put me in a happy frame of mind, and soon helped to
overcome every inconvenience.
At this time I insisted with the utmost firmness on refraining from taking
any further share in the management of the theatre, and I had most cogent
reasons to bring forth in defence of my conduct. All my endeavours to set in
order the wilful chaos which prevailed in the use of the costly artistic
materials at the disposal of this royal institution were repeatedly thwarted,
merely because I wished to introduce some method into the arrangements.
In a carefully written pamphlet which, in addition to my other work, I had
compiled during the past winter, I had drawn up a plan for the
reorganisation of the orchestra, and had shown how we might increase the
productive power of our artistic capital by making a more methodical use of
the royal funds intended for its maintenance, and showing greater discretion
regarding salaries. This increase in the productive power would raise the
artistic spirit as well as improve the economic position of the members of
the orchestra, for I should have liked them at the same time to form an
independent concert society. In such a capacity it would have been their
task to present to the people of Dresden, in the best possible way, a kind of
music which they had hitherto hardly had the opportunity of enjoying at all.
It would have been possible for such a union, which, as I pointed out, had
so many external circumstances in its favour, to provide Dresden with a
suitable concert-hall. I hear, however, that such a place is wanting to this
day.
With this object in view I entered into close communication with
architects and builders, and the plans were completed, according to which
the scandalous buildings facing a wing of the renowned prison opposite the
Ostra Allee, and consisting of a shed for the members of the theatre and a
public wash-house, were to be pulled down and replaced by a beautiful
building, which, besides containing a large concert-hall adapted to our
requirements, would also have had other large rooms which could have
been, let out on hire at a profit. The practicality of these plans was disputed
by no one, as even the administrators of the orchestra’s widows’ fund saw in
them an opportunity for the safe and advantageous laying out of capital; yet
they were returned to me, after long consideration on the part of the general
management, with thanks and an acknowledgment of my careful work, and
the curt reply that it was thought better for things to remain as they were.
overcome every inconvenience.
At this time I insisted with the utmost firmness on refraining from taking
any further share in the management of the theatre, and I had most cogent
reasons to bring forth in defence of my conduct. All my endeavours to set in
order the wilful chaos which prevailed in the use of the costly artistic
materials at the disposal of this royal institution were repeatedly thwarted,
merely because I wished to introduce some method into the arrangements.
In a carefully written pamphlet which, in addition to my other work, I had
compiled during the past winter, I had drawn up a plan for the
reorganisation of the orchestra, and had shown how we might increase the
productive power of our artistic capital by making a more methodical use of
the royal funds intended for its maintenance, and showing greater discretion
regarding salaries. This increase in the productive power would raise the
artistic spirit as well as improve the economic position of the members of
the orchestra, for I should have liked them at the same time to form an
independent concert society. In such a capacity it would have been their
task to present to the people of Dresden, in the best possible way, a kind of
music which they had hitherto hardly had the opportunity of enjoying at all.
It would have been possible for such a union, which, as I pointed out, had
so many external circumstances in its favour, to provide Dresden with a
suitable concert-hall. I hear, however, that such a place is wanting to this
day.
With this object in view I entered into close communication with
architects and builders, and the plans were completed, according to which
the scandalous buildings facing a wing of the renowned prison opposite the
Ostra Allee, and consisting of a shed for the members of the theatre and a
public wash-house, were to be pulled down and replaced by a beautiful
building, which, besides containing a large concert-hall adapted to our
requirements, would also have had other large rooms which could have
been, let out on hire at a profit. The practicality of these plans was disputed
by no one, as even the administrators of the orchestra’s widows’ fund saw in
them an opportunity for the safe and advantageous laying out of capital; yet
they were returned to me, after long consideration on the part of the general
management, with thanks and an acknowledgment of my careful work, and
the curt reply that it was thought better for things to remain as they were.
Page 378
All my proposals for meeting the useless waste and drain upon our
artistic capital by a more methodical arrangement, met with the same
success in every detail that I suggested. I had also found out by long
experience that every proposal which had to be discussed and decided upon
in the most tiring committee meetings, as for instance the starting of a
repertoire, might at any moment be overthrown and altered for the worse by
the temper of a singer or the plan of a junior business inspector. I was
therefore driven to renounce my wasted efforts and, after many a stormy
discussion and outspoken expression of my sentiments, I withdrew from
taking any part whatever in any branch of the management, and limited
myself entirely to holding rehearsals and conducting performances of the
operas provided for me.
Although my relations with Lüttichau grew more and more strained on
this account, for the time being it mattered little whether my conduct
pleased him or not, as otherwise my position was one which commanded
respect, on account of the ever-increasing popularity of Tannhäuser and
Rienzi, which were presented during the summer to houses packed with
distinguished visitors, and were invariably chosen for the gala
performances.
By thus going my own way and refusing to be interfered with, I
succeeded this summer, amid the delightful and perfect seclusion of my
new home, in preserving myself in a frame of mind exceedingly favourable
to the completion of my Lohengrin. My studies, which, as I have already
mentioned, I pursued eagerly at the same time as I was working on my
opera, made me feel more light-hearted than I had ever done before. For the
first time I now mastered AEschylus with real feeling and understanding.
Droysen’s eloquent commentaries in particular helped to bring before my
imagination the intoxicating effect of the production of an Athenian tragedy,
so that I could see the Oresteia with my mind’s eye, as though it were
actually being performed, and its effect upon me was indescribable.
Nothing, however, could equal the sublime emotion with which the
Agamemnon trilogy inspired me, and to the last word of the Eumenides I
lived in an atmosphere so far removed from the present day that I have
never since been really able to reconcile myself with modern literature. My
ideas about the whole significance of the drama and of the theatre were,
without a doubt, moulded by these impressions. I worked my way through
the other tragedians, and finally reached Aristophanes. When I had spent the
artistic capital by a more methodical arrangement, met with the same
success in every detail that I suggested. I had also found out by long
experience that every proposal which had to be discussed and decided upon
in the most tiring committee meetings, as for instance the starting of a
repertoire, might at any moment be overthrown and altered for the worse by
the temper of a singer or the plan of a junior business inspector. I was
therefore driven to renounce my wasted efforts and, after many a stormy
discussion and outspoken expression of my sentiments, I withdrew from
taking any part whatever in any branch of the management, and limited
myself entirely to holding rehearsals and conducting performances of the
operas provided for me.
Although my relations with Lüttichau grew more and more strained on
this account, for the time being it mattered little whether my conduct
pleased him or not, as otherwise my position was one which commanded
respect, on account of the ever-increasing popularity of Tannhäuser and
Rienzi, which were presented during the summer to houses packed with
distinguished visitors, and were invariably chosen for the gala
performances.
By thus going my own way and refusing to be interfered with, I
succeeded this summer, amid the delightful and perfect seclusion of my
new home, in preserving myself in a frame of mind exceedingly favourable
to the completion of my Lohengrin. My studies, which, as I have already
mentioned, I pursued eagerly at the same time as I was working on my
opera, made me feel more light-hearted than I had ever done before. For the
first time I now mastered AEschylus with real feeling and understanding.
Droysen’s eloquent commentaries in particular helped to bring before my
imagination the intoxicating effect of the production of an Athenian tragedy,
so that I could see the Oresteia with my mind’s eye, as though it were
actually being performed, and its effect upon me was indescribable.
Nothing, however, could equal the sublime emotion with which the
Agamemnon trilogy inspired me, and to the last word of the Eumenides I
lived in an atmosphere so far removed from the present day that I have
never since been really able to reconcile myself with modern literature. My
ideas about the whole significance of the drama and of the theatre were,
without a doubt, moulded by these impressions. I worked my way through
the other tragedians, and finally reached Aristophanes. When I had spent the
Page 379
morning industriously upon the completion of the music for Lohengrin, I
used to creep into the depths of a thick shrubbery in my part of the garden
to get shelter from the summer heat, which was becoming more intense
every day. My delight in the comedies of Aristophanes was boundless,
when once his Birds had plunged me into the full torrent of the genius of
this wanton favourite of the Graces, as he used to call himself with
conscious daring. Side by side with this poet I read the principal dialogues
of Plato, and from the Symposium I gained such a deep insight into the
wonderful beauty of Greek life that I felt myself more truly at home in
ancient Athens than in any conditions which the modern world has to offer.
As I was following out a settled course of self-education, I did not wish
to pursue my way further in the leading-strings of any literary history, and I
consequently turned my attention from the historical studies, which seemed
to be my own peculiar province, and in which department Droysen’s history
of Alexander and the Hellenistic period, as well as Niebuhr and Gibbon,
were of great help to me, and fell back once more upon my old and trusty
guide, Jakob Grimm, for the study of German antiquity. In my efforts to
master the myths of Germany more thoroughly than had been possible in
my former perusal of the Nibelung and the Heldenbuch, Mone’s particularly
suggestive commentary on this Heldensage filled me with delight, although
stricter scholars regarded this work with suspicion on account of the
boldness of some of its statements. By this means I was drawn irresistibly
to the northern sagas; and I now tried, as far as was possible without a
fluent knowledge of the Scandinavian languages, to acquaint myself with
the Edda, as well as with the prose version which existed of a considerable
portion of the Heldensage.
Read by the light of Mone’s Commentaries, the Wolsungasaga had a
decided influence upon my method of handling this material. My
conceptions as to the inner significance of these old-world legends, which
had been growing for a long time, gradually gained strength and moulded
themselves with the plastic forms which inspired my later works.
All this was sinking into my mind and slowly maturing, whilst with
unfeigned delight I was finishing the music of the first two acts of
Lohengrin, which were now at last completed. I now succeeded in shutting
out the past and building up for myself a new world of the future, which
presented itself with ever-growing clearness to my mind as the refuge
used to creep into the depths of a thick shrubbery in my part of the garden
to get shelter from the summer heat, which was becoming more intense
every day. My delight in the comedies of Aristophanes was boundless,
when once his Birds had plunged me into the full torrent of the genius of
this wanton favourite of the Graces, as he used to call himself with
conscious daring. Side by side with this poet I read the principal dialogues
of Plato, and from the Symposium I gained such a deep insight into the
wonderful beauty of Greek life that I felt myself more truly at home in
ancient Athens than in any conditions which the modern world has to offer.
As I was following out a settled course of self-education, I did not wish
to pursue my way further in the leading-strings of any literary history, and I
consequently turned my attention from the historical studies, which seemed
to be my own peculiar province, and in which department Droysen’s history
of Alexander and the Hellenistic period, as well as Niebuhr and Gibbon,
were of great help to me, and fell back once more upon my old and trusty
guide, Jakob Grimm, for the study of German antiquity. In my efforts to
master the myths of Germany more thoroughly than had been possible in
my former perusal of the Nibelung and the Heldenbuch, Mone’s particularly
suggestive commentary on this Heldensage filled me with delight, although
stricter scholars regarded this work with suspicion on account of the
boldness of some of its statements. By this means I was drawn irresistibly
to the northern sagas; and I now tried, as far as was possible without a
fluent knowledge of the Scandinavian languages, to acquaint myself with
the Edda, as well as with the prose version which existed of a considerable
portion of the Heldensage.
Read by the light of Mone’s Commentaries, the Wolsungasaga had a
decided influence upon my method of handling this material. My
conceptions as to the inner significance of these old-world legends, which
had been growing for a long time, gradually gained strength and moulded
themselves with the plastic forms which inspired my later works.
All this was sinking into my mind and slowly maturing, whilst with
unfeigned delight I was finishing the music of the first two acts of
Lohengrin, which were now at last completed. I now succeeded in shutting
out the past and building up for myself a new world of the future, which
presented itself with ever-growing clearness to my mind as the refuge
Page 380
whither I might retreat from all the miseries of modern opera and theatre
life. At the same time, my health and temper were settling down into a
mood of almost unclouded serenity, which made me oblivious for a long
time of all the worries of my position. I used to walk every day up into the
neighbouring hills, which rose from the banks of the Elbe to the
Plauenscher Grand. I generally went alone, except for the company of our
little dog Peps, and my excursions always resulted in producing a
satisfactory number of ideas. At the same time, I found I had developed a
capacity, which I had never possessed before, for good-tempered
intercourse with the friends and acquaintances who liked to come from time
to time to the Marcolini garden to share my simple supper. My visitors used
often to find me perched on a high branch of a tree, or on the neck of the
Neptune which was the central figure of a large group of statuary in the
middle of an old fountain, unfortunately always dry, belonging to the palmy
days of the Marcolini estate. I used to enjoy walking with my friends up and
down the broad footpath of the drive leading to the real palace, which had
been laid especially for Napoleon in the fatal year 1813, when he had fixed
his headquarters there.
By August, the last month of summer, I had completely finished the
composition of Lohengrin, and felt that it was high time for me to have
done so, as the needs of my position demanded imperatively that I should
give my most serious attention to improving it, and it became a matter of
supreme importance for me once more to take steps for having my operas
produced in the German theatres.
Even the success of Tannhäuser in Dresden, which became more obvious
every day, did not attract the smallest notice anywhere else. Berlin was the
only place which had any influence in the theatrical world of Germany, and
I ought long before to have given my undivided attention to that city. From
all I had heard of the special tastes of Friedrich Wilhelm IV., I felt perfectly
justified in assuming that he would feel sympathetically inclined towards
my later works and conceptions if I could only manage to bring them to his
notice in the right light. On this hypothesis I had already thought of
dedicating Tannhäuser to him, and to gain permission to do so I had to
apply to Count Redern, the court musical director. From him I heard that the
King could only accept the dedication of works which had actually been
performed in his presence, and of which he thus had a personal knowledge.
As my Tannhäuser had been refused by the managers of the court theatre
life. At the same time, my health and temper were settling down into a
mood of almost unclouded serenity, which made me oblivious for a long
time of all the worries of my position. I used to walk every day up into the
neighbouring hills, which rose from the banks of the Elbe to the
Plauenscher Grand. I generally went alone, except for the company of our
little dog Peps, and my excursions always resulted in producing a
satisfactory number of ideas. At the same time, I found I had developed a
capacity, which I had never possessed before, for good-tempered
intercourse with the friends and acquaintances who liked to come from time
to time to the Marcolini garden to share my simple supper. My visitors used
often to find me perched on a high branch of a tree, or on the neck of the
Neptune which was the central figure of a large group of statuary in the
middle of an old fountain, unfortunately always dry, belonging to the palmy
days of the Marcolini estate. I used to enjoy walking with my friends up and
down the broad footpath of the drive leading to the real palace, which had
been laid especially for Napoleon in the fatal year 1813, when he had fixed
his headquarters there.
By August, the last month of summer, I had completely finished the
composition of Lohengrin, and felt that it was high time for me to have
done so, as the needs of my position demanded imperatively that I should
give my most serious attention to improving it, and it became a matter of
supreme importance for me once more to take steps for having my operas
produced in the German theatres.
Even the success of Tannhäuser in Dresden, which became more obvious
every day, did not attract the smallest notice anywhere else. Berlin was the
only place which had any influence in the theatrical world of Germany, and
I ought long before to have given my undivided attention to that city. From
all I had heard of the special tastes of Friedrich Wilhelm IV., I felt perfectly
justified in assuming that he would feel sympathetically inclined towards
my later works and conceptions if I could only manage to bring them to his
notice in the right light. On this hypothesis I had already thought of
dedicating Tannhäuser to him, and to gain permission to do so I had to
apply to Count Redern, the court musical director. From him I heard that the
King could only accept the dedication of works which had actually been
performed in his presence, and of which he thus had a personal knowledge.
As my Tannhäuser had been refused by the managers of the court theatre
Page 381
because it was considered too epic in form, the Count added that if I wished
to remain firm in my resolve, there was only one way out of the difficulty,
and that was to adapt my opera as far as possible to a military band, and try
to bring it to the King’s notice on parade. This drove me to determine upon
another plan of attack on Berlin.
After this experience I saw that I must open my campaign there with the
opera that had won the most decided triumph in Dresden. I therefore
obtained an audience of the Queen of Saxony, the sister of the King of
Prussia, and begged her to use her influence with her brother to obtain a
performance in Berlin by royal command of my Rienzi, which was also a
favourite with the court of Saxony. This manœuvre was successful, and I
soon received a communication from my old friend Küstner to say that the
production of Rienzi was fixed for a very early date at the Berlin Court
Theatre, and at the same time expressing the hope that I would conduct my
work in person. As a very handsome author’s royalty had been paid by this
theatre, at the instigation of Küstner, on the occasion of the production of
his old Munich friend Lachner’s opera, Katharina von Cornaro, I hoped to
realise a very substantial improvement in my finances if only the success of
Rienzi in this city in any degree rivalled that in Dresden. But my chief
desire was to make the acquaintance of the King of Prussia, so that I might
read him the text of my Lohengrin, and arouse his interest in my work. This
from various signs I flattered myself was perfectly possible, in which case I
intended to beg him to command the first performance of Lohengrin to be
given at his court theatre.
After my strange experiences as to the way in which my success in
Dresden had been kept secret from the rest of Germany, it seemed to me a
matter of vital importance to make the future centre of my artistic
enterprises the only place which exercised any influence on the outside
world, and as such I was forced to regard Berlin. Inspired by the success of
my recommendation to the Queen of Prussia, I hoped to gain access to the
King himself, which I regarded as a most important step. Full of
confidence, and in excellent spirits, I set out for Berlin in September,
trusting to a favourable turn of Fortune’s wheel, in the first place for the
rehearsals of Rienzi, though my interests were no longer centred in this
work.
to remain firm in my resolve, there was only one way out of the difficulty,
and that was to adapt my opera as far as possible to a military band, and try
to bring it to the King’s notice on parade. This drove me to determine upon
another plan of attack on Berlin.
After this experience I saw that I must open my campaign there with the
opera that had won the most decided triumph in Dresden. I therefore
obtained an audience of the Queen of Saxony, the sister of the King of
Prussia, and begged her to use her influence with her brother to obtain a
performance in Berlin by royal command of my Rienzi, which was also a
favourite with the court of Saxony. This manœuvre was successful, and I
soon received a communication from my old friend Küstner to say that the
production of Rienzi was fixed for a very early date at the Berlin Court
Theatre, and at the same time expressing the hope that I would conduct my
work in person. As a very handsome author’s royalty had been paid by this
theatre, at the instigation of Küstner, on the occasion of the production of
his old Munich friend Lachner’s opera, Katharina von Cornaro, I hoped to
realise a very substantial improvement in my finances if only the success of
Rienzi in this city in any degree rivalled that in Dresden. But my chief
desire was to make the acquaintance of the King of Prussia, so that I might
read him the text of my Lohengrin, and arouse his interest in my work. This
from various signs I flattered myself was perfectly possible, in which case I
intended to beg him to command the first performance of Lohengrin to be
given at his court theatre.
After my strange experiences as to the way in which my success in
Dresden had been kept secret from the rest of Germany, it seemed to me a
matter of vital importance to make the future centre of my artistic
enterprises the only place which exercised any influence on the outside
world, and as such I was forced to regard Berlin. Inspired by the success of
my recommendation to the Queen of Prussia, I hoped to gain access to the
King himself, which I regarded as a most important step. Full of
confidence, and in excellent spirits, I set out for Berlin in September,
trusting to a favourable turn of Fortune’s wheel, in the first place for the
rehearsals of Rienzi, though my interests were no longer centred in this
work.
Page 382
Berlin made the same impression on me as on the occasion of my former
visit, when I saw it again after my long absence in Paris. Professor Werder,
my friend of the Fliegender Holländer, had taken lodgings for me in
advance in the renowned Gensdarmeplatz, but when I looked at the view
from my windows every day I could not believe that I was in a city which
was the very centre of Germany. Soon, however, I was completely absorbed
by the cares of the task I had in hand.
I had nothing to complain of with regard to the official preparations for
Rienzi, but I soon noticed that it was looked upon merely as a conductor’s
opera, that is to say, all the materials to hand were duly placed at my
disposal, but the management had not the slightest intention of doing
anything more for me. All the arrangements for my rehearsals were entirely
upset as soon as a visit from Jenny Lind was announced, and she occupied
the Royal Opera exclusively for some time.
During the delay thus caused I did all I could to attain my main object—
an introduction to the King—and for this purpose made use of my former
acquaintance with the court musical director, Count Redern. This gentleman
received me at once with the greatest affability, invited me to dinner and a
soiree, and entered into a hearty discussion with me about the steps
necessary for attaining my purpose, in which he promised to do his utmost
to help me. I also paid frequent visits to Sans-Souci, in order to pay my
respects to the Queen and express my thanks to her. But I never got further
than an interview with the ladies-in-waiting, and I was advised to put
myself into communication with M. Illaire, the head of the Royal Privy
Council. This gentleman seemed to be impressed by the seriousness of my
request, and promised to do what he could to further my wish for a personal
introduction to the King. He asked what my real object was, and I told him
it was to get permission from the King to read my libretto Lohengrin to
him. On the occasion of one of my oft-repeated visits from Berlin, he asked
me whether I did not think it would be advisable to bring a recommendation
of my work from Tieck. I was able to tell him that I had already had the
pleasure of bringing my case to the notice of the old poet, who lived near
Potsdam as a royal pensioner.
I remembered very well that Frau von Lüttichau had sent the themes
Lohengrin and Tannhäuser to her old friend some years ago, when these
matters were first mentioned between us. When I called upon Tieck, I was
visit, when I saw it again after my long absence in Paris. Professor Werder,
my friend of the Fliegender Holländer, had taken lodgings for me in
advance in the renowned Gensdarmeplatz, but when I looked at the view
from my windows every day I could not believe that I was in a city which
was the very centre of Germany. Soon, however, I was completely absorbed
by the cares of the task I had in hand.
I had nothing to complain of with regard to the official preparations for
Rienzi, but I soon noticed that it was looked upon merely as a conductor’s
opera, that is to say, all the materials to hand were duly placed at my
disposal, but the management had not the slightest intention of doing
anything more for me. All the arrangements for my rehearsals were entirely
upset as soon as a visit from Jenny Lind was announced, and she occupied
the Royal Opera exclusively for some time.
During the delay thus caused I did all I could to attain my main object—
an introduction to the King—and for this purpose made use of my former
acquaintance with the court musical director, Count Redern. This gentleman
received me at once with the greatest affability, invited me to dinner and a
soiree, and entered into a hearty discussion with me about the steps
necessary for attaining my purpose, in which he promised to do his utmost
to help me. I also paid frequent visits to Sans-Souci, in order to pay my
respects to the Queen and express my thanks to her. But I never got further
than an interview with the ladies-in-waiting, and I was advised to put
myself into communication with M. Illaire, the head of the Royal Privy
Council. This gentleman seemed to be impressed by the seriousness of my
request, and promised to do what he could to further my wish for a personal
introduction to the King. He asked what my real object was, and I told him
it was to get permission from the King to read my libretto Lohengrin to
him. On the occasion of one of my oft-repeated visits from Berlin, he asked
me whether I did not think it would be advisable to bring a recommendation
of my work from Tieck. I was able to tell him that I had already had the
pleasure of bringing my case to the notice of the old poet, who lived near
Potsdam as a royal pensioner.
I remembered very well that Frau von Lüttichau had sent the themes
Lohengrin and Tannhäuser to her old friend some years ago, when these
matters were first mentioned between us. When I called upon Tieck, I was
Page 383
welcomed by him almost as a friend, and I found my long talks with him
exceedingly valuable. Although Tieck had perhaps gained a somewhat
doubtful reputation for the leniency with which he would give his
recommendation for the dramatic works of those who applied to him, yet I
was pleased by the genuine disgust with which he spoke of our latest
dramatic literature, which was modelling itself on the style of modern
French stagecraft, and his complaint at the utter lack of any true poetic
feeling in it was heartfelt. He declared himself delighted with my poem of
Lohengrin, but could not understand how all this was to be set to music
without a complete change in the conventional structure of an opera, and on
this score he objected to such scenes as that between Ortrud and Frederick
at the beginning of the second act. I thought I had roused him to a real
enthusiasm when I explained how I proposed to solve these apparent
difficulties, and also described my own ideals about musical drama. But the
higher I soared the sadder he grew when I had once made known to him my
hope of securing the patronage of the King of Prussia for these conceptions,
and the working out of my scheme for an ideal drama. He had no doubt that
the King would listen to me with the greatest interest, and even seize upon
my ideas with warmth, only I must not entertain the smallest hope of any
practical result, unless I wished to expose myself to the bitterest
disappointment. ‘What can you expect from a man who to-day is
enthusiastic about Gluck’s Iphigenia in Tauris, and to-morrow mad about
Donizetti’s Lucrezia Borgia?’ he said. Tieck’s conversation about these and
similar topics was much too entertaining and charming for me to give any
serious weight to the bitterness of his views. He gladly promised to
recommend my poem, more particularly to Privy Councillor Illaire, and
dismissed me with hearty goodwill and his sincere though anxious blessing.
The only result of all my labours was that the desired invitation from the
King still hung fire. As the rehearsals for Rienzi, which had been postponed
on account of Jenny Lind’s visit, were being carried on seriously again, I
made up my mind to take no further trouble before the performance of my
opera, as I thought myself, at any rate, justified in counting on the presence
of the monarch on the first night, as the piece was being played at his
express command, and at the same time I hoped this would conduce to the
fulfilment of my main object. However, the nearer we came to the event the
lower did the hopes I had built upon it sink. To play the part of the hero I
had to be satisfied with a tenor who was absolutely devoid of talent, and far
exceedingly valuable. Although Tieck had perhaps gained a somewhat
doubtful reputation for the leniency with which he would give his
recommendation for the dramatic works of those who applied to him, yet I
was pleased by the genuine disgust with which he spoke of our latest
dramatic literature, which was modelling itself on the style of modern
French stagecraft, and his complaint at the utter lack of any true poetic
feeling in it was heartfelt. He declared himself delighted with my poem of
Lohengrin, but could not understand how all this was to be set to music
without a complete change in the conventional structure of an opera, and on
this score he objected to such scenes as that between Ortrud and Frederick
at the beginning of the second act. I thought I had roused him to a real
enthusiasm when I explained how I proposed to solve these apparent
difficulties, and also described my own ideals about musical drama. But the
higher I soared the sadder he grew when I had once made known to him my
hope of securing the patronage of the King of Prussia for these conceptions,
and the working out of my scheme for an ideal drama. He had no doubt that
the King would listen to me with the greatest interest, and even seize upon
my ideas with warmth, only I must not entertain the smallest hope of any
practical result, unless I wished to expose myself to the bitterest
disappointment. ‘What can you expect from a man who to-day is
enthusiastic about Gluck’s Iphigenia in Tauris, and to-morrow mad about
Donizetti’s Lucrezia Borgia?’ he said. Tieck’s conversation about these and
similar topics was much too entertaining and charming for me to give any
serious weight to the bitterness of his views. He gladly promised to
recommend my poem, more particularly to Privy Councillor Illaire, and
dismissed me with hearty goodwill and his sincere though anxious blessing.
The only result of all my labours was that the desired invitation from the
King still hung fire. As the rehearsals for Rienzi, which had been postponed
on account of Jenny Lind’s visit, were being carried on seriously again, I
made up my mind to take no further trouble before the performance of my
opera, as I thought myself, at any rate, justified in counting on the presence
of the monarch on the first night, as the piece was being played at his
express command, and at the same time I hoped this would conduce to the
fulfilment of my main object. However, the nearer we came to the event the
lower did the hopes I had built upon it sink. To play the part of the hero I
had to be satisfied with a tenor who was absolutely devoid of talent, and far
Page 384
below the average. He was a conscientious, painstaking man, and had
moreover been strongly recommended to me by my kind host, the
renowned Meinhard. After I had taken infinite pains with him, and had in
consequence, as so often happens, conjured up in my mind certain illusions
as to what I might expect from his acting, I was obliged, when it came to
the final test of the dress rehearsal, to confess my true opinion. I realised
that the scenery, chorus, ballet, and minor parts were on the whole
excellent, but that the chief character, around whom in this particular opera
everything centred, faded into an insignificant phantom. The reception
which this opera met with at the hands of the public when it was produced
in October was also due to him; but in consequence of the fairly good
rendering of a few brilliant passages, and more especially on account of the
enthusiastic recognition of Frau Koster in the part of Adriano, it might have
been concluded from all the external signs that the opera had been fairly
successful. Nevertheless, I knew very well that this seeming triumph could
have no real substance, as only the immaterial parts of my work could reach
the eyes and ears of the audience; its essential spirit had not entered their
hearts. Moreover, the Berlin reviewers in their usual way began their attacks
immediately, with the view of demolishing any success my opera might
have won, so that after the second performance, which I also conducted
myself, I began to wonder whether my desperate labours were really worth
while.
When I asked the few intimate friends I had their opinion on this point, I
elicited much valuable information. Among these friends I must mention, in
the first place, Hermann Franck, whom I found again. He had lately settled
in Berlin, and did much to encourage me. I spent the most enjoyable part of
those sad two months in his company, of which, however, I had but too
little. Our conversation generally turned upon reminiscences of the old
days, and on to topics which had no connection with the theatre, so that I
was almost ashamed to trouble him with my complaints on this subject,
especially as they concerned my worries about a work which I could not
pretend was of any practical importance to the stage. He for his part soon
arrived at the conclusion that it had been foolish of me to choose my Rienzi
for this occasion, as it was an opera which appealed merely to the general
public, in preference to my Tannhäuser, which might have educated a party
in Berlin useful to my higher aims. He maintained that the very nature of
this work would have aroused a fresh interest in the drama in the minds of
moreover been strongly recommended to me by my kind host, the
renowned Meinhard. After I had taken infinite pains with him, and had in
consequence, as so often happens, conjured up in my mind certain illusions
as to what I might expect from his acting, I was obliged, when it came to
the final test of the dress rehearsal, to confess my true opinion. I realised
that the scenery, chorus, ballet, and minor parts were on the whole
excellent, but that the chief character, around whom in this particular opera
everything centred, faded into an insignificant phantom. The reception
which this opera met with at the hands of the public when it was produced
in October was also due to him; but in consequence of the fairly good
rendering of a few brilliant passages, and more especially on account of the
enthusiastic recognition of Frau Koster in the part of Adriano, it might have
been concluded from all the external signs that the opera had been fairly
successful. Nevertheless, I knew very well that this seeming triumph could
have no real substance, as only the immaterial parts of my work could reach
the eyes and ears of the audience; its essential spirit had not entered their
hearts. Moreover, the Berlin reviewers in their usual way began their attacks
immediately, with the view of demolishing any success my opera might
have won, so that after the second performance, which I also conducted
myself, I began to wonder whether my desperate labours were really worth
while.
When I asked the few intimate friends I had their opinion on this point, I
elicited much valuable information. Among these friends I must mention, in
the first place, Hermann Franck, whom I found again. He had lately settled
in Berlin, and did much to encourage me. I spent the most enjoyable part of
those sad two months in his company, of which, however, I had but too
little. Our conversation generally turned upon reminiscences of the old
days, and on to topics which had no connection with the theatre, so that I
was almost ashamed to trouble him with my complaints on this subject,
especially as they concerned my worries about a work which I could not
pretend was of any practical importance to the stage. He for his part soon
arrived at the conclusion that it had been foolish of me to choose my Rienzi
for this occasion, as it was an opera which appealed merely to the general
public, in preference to my Tannhäuser, which might have educated a party
in Berlin useful to my higher aims. He maintained that the very nature of
this work would have aroused a fresh interest in the drama in the minds of
Page 385
people who, like himself, were no longer to be counted among regular
theatre-goers, precisely because they had given up all hope of ever finding
any nobler ideals of the stage.
The curious information as to the character of Berlin art in other respects,
which Werder gave me from time to time, was most discouraging. With
regard to the public, he told me once that at a performance of an unknown
work, it was quite useless for me to expect a single member of the audience
from the stalls to the gallery to take his seat with any better object in view
than to pick as many holes as possible in the production. Although Werder
did not wish to discourage me in any of my endeavours, he felt himself
obliged to warn me continually not to expect anything above the average
from the cultured society of Berlin. He liked to see proper respect paid to
the really considerable gifts of the King; and when I asked him how he
thought the latter would receive my ideas about the ennobling of opera, he
answered, after having listened attentively to a long and fiery tirade on my
part: ‘The King would say to you, “Go and consult Stawinsky!”’ This was
the opera manager, a fat, smug creature who had grown rusty in following
out the most jog-trot routine. In short, everything I learned was calculated
to discourage me. I called on Bernhard Marx, who some years ago had
shown a kindly interest in my Fliegender Holländer, and was courteously
received by him. This man, who in his earlier writings and musical
criticisms had seemed to me filled with a fire of energy, now struck me as
extraordinarily limp and listless when I saw him by the side of his young
wife, who was radiantly and bewitchingly beautiful. From his conversation
I soon learned that he also had abandoned even the remotest hope of
success for any efforts directed towards the object so dear to both our
hearts, on account of the inconceivable shallowness of all the officials
connected with the head authority. He told me of the extraordinary fate
which had befallen a scheme he had brought to the notice of the King for
founding a school of music. In a special audience the King had gone into
the matter with the greatest interest, and noticed the minutest detail, so that
Marx felt justified in entertaining the strongest possible hopes of success.
However, all his labours and negotiations about the business, in the course
of which he was driven from pillar to post, proved utterly futile, until at last
he was told to have an interview with a certain general. This personage, like
the King, had Marx’s proposals explained to him in the minutest detail, and
expressed his warmest sympathy with the undertaking. ‘And there,’ said
theatre-goers, precisely because they had given up all hope of ever finding
any nobler ideals of the stage.
The curious information as to the character of Berlin art in other respects,
which Werder gave me from time to time, was most discouraging. With
regard to the public, he told me once that at a performance of an unknown
work, it was quite useless for me to expect a single member of the audience
from the stalls to the gallery to take his seat with any better object in view
than to pick as many holes as possible in the production. Although Werder
did not wish to discourage me in any of my endeavours, he felt himself
obliged to warn me continually not to expect anything above the average
from the cultured society of Berlin. He liked to see proper respect paid to
the really considerable gifts of the King; and when I asked him how he
thought the latter would receive my ideas about the ennobling of opera, he
answered, after having listened attentively to a long and fiery tirade on my
part: ‘The King would say to you, “Go and consult Stawinsky!”’ This was
the opera manager, a fat, smug creature who had grown rusty in following
out the most jog-trot routine. In short, everything I learned was calculated
to discourage me. I called on Bernhard Marx, who some years ago had
shown a kindly interest in my Fliegender Holländer, and was courteously
received by him. This man, who in his earlier writings and musical
criticisms had seemed to me filled with a fire of energy, now struck me as
extraordinarily limp and listless when I saw him by the side of his young
wife, who was radiantly and bewitchingly beautiful. From his conversation
I soon learned that he also had abandoned even the remotest hope of
success for any efforts directed towards the object so dear to both our
hearts, on account of the inconceivable shallowness of all the officials
connected with the head authority. He told me of the extraordinary fate
which had befallen a scheme he had brought to the notice of the King for
founding a school of music. In a special audience the King had gone into
the matter with the greatest interest, and noticed the minutest detail, so that
Marx felt justified in entertaining the strongest possible hopes of success.
However, all his labours and negotiations about the business, in the course
of which he was driven from pillar to post, proved utterly futile, until at last
he was told to have an interview with a certain general. This personage, like
the King, had Marx’s proposals explained to him in the minutest detail, and
expressed his warmest sympathy with the undertaking. ‘And there,’ said
Page 386
Marx, at the end of this long rigmarole, ‘the matter ended, and I never heard
another word about it.’
One day I learned that Countess Rossi, the renowned Henriette Sontag,
who was living in quiet seclusion in Berlin, had pleasant recollections of me
in Dresden, and wished me to visit her. She had at this time already fallen
into the unfortunate position which was so detrimental to her artistic career.
She too complained bitterly of the general apathy of the influential classes
in Berlin, which effectually prevented any artistic aims from being realised.
It was her opinion that the King found a sort of satisfaction in knowing that
the theatre was badly managed, for though he never opposed any criticisms
which he received on the subject, he likewise never supported any proposal
for its improvement. She expressed a wish to know something of my latest
work, and I gave her my poem of Lohengrin for perusal. On the occasion of
my next morning call she told me she would send me an invitation to a
musical evening which she was going to have at her house in honour of the
Grand Duke of Mecklenburg-Strelitz, her elderly patron, and she also gave
me back the manuscript of Lohengrin, with the assurance that it had
appealed to her very much, and that while she was reading it she had often
seen the little fairies and elves dancing about in front of her. As in the old
days I had been heartily encouraged by the warm and friendly sympathy of
this naturally cultured woman, I now felt as if cold water had been suddenly
poured down my back. I soon took my leave, and never saw her again.
Indeed, I had no particular object in doing so, as the promised invitation
never came. Herr E. Kossak also sought me out, and although our
acquaintance did not lead to much, I was sufficiently kindly received by
him to give him my poem of Lohengrin to read. I went one day by
appointment to see him, and found that his room had just been scrubbed
with boiling water. The steam from this operation was so unbearable that it
had already given him a headache, and was not less disagreeable to me. He
looked into my face with an almost tender expression when he gave me
back the manuscript of my poem, and assured me, in accents which
admitted of no doubt of his sincerity, that he thought it ‘very pretty.’
I found my casual intercourse with H. Truhn rather more entertaining. I
used to treat him to a good glass of wine at Lutter and Wegener’s, where I
went occasionally on account of its association with Hoffmann, and he
would then listen with apparently growing interest to my ideas as to the
possible development of opera and the goal at which we should aim. His
another word about it.’
One day I learned that Countess Rossi, the renowned Henriette Sontag,
who was living in quiet seclusion in Berlin, had pleasant recollections of me
in Dresden, and wished me to visit her. She had at this time already fallen
into the unfortunate position which was so detrimental to her artistic career.
She too complained bitterly of the general apathy of the influential classes
in Berlin, which effectually prevented any artistic aims from being realised.
It was her opinion that the King found a sort of satisfaction in knowing that
the theatre was badly managed, for though he never opposed any criticisms
which he received on the subject, he likewise never supported any proposal
for its improvement. She expressed a wish to know something of my latest
work, and I gave her my poem of Lohengrin for perusal. On the occasion of
my next morning call she told me she would send me an invitation to a
musical evening which she was going to have at her house in honour of the
Grand Duke of Mecklenburg-Strelitz, her elderly patron, and she also gave
me back the manuscript of Lohengrin, with the assurance that it had
appealed to her very much, and that while she was reading it she had often
seen the little fairies and elves dancing about in front of her. As in the old
days I had been heartily encouraged by the warm and friendly sympathy of
this naturally cultured woman, I now felt as if cold water had been suddenly
poured down my back. I soon took my leave, and never saw her again.
Indeed, I had no particular object in doing so, as the promised invitation
never came. Herr E. Kossak also sought me out, and although our
acquaintance did not lead to much, I was sufficiently kindly received by
him to give him my poem of Lohengrin to read. I went one day by
appointment to see him, and found that his room had just been scrubbed
with boiling water. The steam from this operation was so unbearable that it
had already given him a headache, and was not less disagreeable to me. He
looked into my face with an almost tender expression when he gave me
back the manuscript of my poem, and assured me, in accents which
admitted of no doubt of his sincerity, that he thought it ‘very pretty.’
I found my casual intercourse with H. Truhn rather more entertaining. I
used to treat him to a good glass of wine at Lutter and Wegener’s, where I
went occasionally on account of its association with Hoffmann, and he
would then listen with apparently growing interest to my ideas as to the
possible development of opera and the goal at which we should aim. His
Page 387
comments were generally witty and very much to the point, and his lively
and animated ways pleased me very much. After the production of Rienzi,
however, he too, as a critic, joined the majority of scoffers and detractors.
The only person who supported me stoutly but uselessly, through thick and
thin, was my old friend Gaillard. His little music-shop was not a success,
his musical journal had already failed, so that he was only able to help me
in small ways. Unfortunately I discovered not only that he was the author of
many exceedingly dubious dramatic works, for which he wished to gain my
support, but also that he was apparently in the last stages of the disease
from which he was suffering, so that the little intercourse I had with him, in
spite of all his fidelity and devotion, only exercised a melancholy and
depressing influence upon me.
But as I had embarked upon this Berlin enterprise in contradiction to all
my inmost wishes, and prompted solely by the desire of winning the
success so vital to my position, I made up my mind to make a personal
appeal to Rellstab.
As in the case of the Fliegender Holländer he had taken exception more
particularly to its ‘nebulousness’ and ‘lack of form,’ I thought I might with
advantage point out to him the brighter and clearer outline of Rienzi. He
seemed to be pleased at my thinking I could get anything out of him, but
told me at once of his firm conviction that any new art form was utterly
impossible after Gluck, and that the only thing that the best of good luck
and hard work was capable of producing was meaningless bombast. I then
realised that in Berlin all hope had been abandoned. I was told that
Meyerbeer was the only man who had been able in any way to master the
situation.
This former patron of mine I met once more in Berlin, and he declared
that he still took an interest in me. As soon as I arrived I called on him, but
in the hall I found his servant busy packing up trunks, and learned that
Meyerbeer was just going away. His master confirmed this assertion, and
regretted that he would not be able to do anything for me, so I had to say
good-bye and how-do-you-do at the same time. For some time I thought he
really was away, but after a few weeks I learned to my surprise that he was
still staying in Berlin without letting himself be seen by any one, and at last
he made his appearance again at one of the rehearsals of Rienzi. What this
meant I only discovered later from a rumour which was circulated among
and animated ways pleased me very much. After the production of Rienzi,
however, he too, as a critic, joined the majority of scoffers and detractors.
The only person who supported me stoutly but uselessly, through thick and
thin, was my old friend Gaillard. His little music-shop was not a success,
his musical journal had already failed, so that he was only able to help me
in small ways. Unfortunately I discovered not only that he was the author of
many exceedingly dubious dramatic works, for which he wished to gain my
support, but also that he was apparently in the last stages of the disease
from which he was suffering, so that the little intercourse I had with him, in
spite of all his fidelity and devotion, only exercised a melancholy and
depressing influence upon me.
But as I had embarked upon this Berlin enterprise in contradiction to all
my inmost wishes, and prompted solely by the desire of winning the
success so vital to my position, I made up my mind to make a personal
appeal to Rellstab.
As in the case of the Fliegender Holländer he had taken exception more
particularly to its ‘nebulousness’ and ‘lack of form,’ I thought I might with
advantage point out to him the brighter and clearer outline of Rienzi. He
seemed to be pleased at my thinking I could get anything out of him, but
told me at once of his firm conviction that any new art form was utterly
impossible after Gluck, and that the only thing that the best of good luck
and hard work was capable of producing was meaningless bombast. I then
realised that in Berlin all hope had been abandoned. I was told that
Meyerbeer was the only man who had been able in any way to master the
situation.
This former patron of mine I met once more in Berlin, and he declared
that he still took an interest in me. As soon as I arrived I called on him, but
in the hall I found his servant busy packing up trunks, and learned that
Meyerbeer was just going away. His master confirmed this assertion, and
regretted that he would not be able to do anything for me, so I had to say
good-bye and how-do-you-do at the same time. For some time I thought he
really was away, but after a few weeks I learned to my surprise that he was
still staying in Berlin without letting himself be seen by any one, and at last
he made his appearance again at one of the rehearsals of Rienzi. What this
meant I only discovered later from a rumour which was circulated among
Page 388
the initiated, and imparted to me by Eduard von Bulow, my young friend’s
father. Without having the slightest idea how it originated, I learned, about
the middle of my stay in Berlin, from the conductor Taubert, that he had
heard on very good authority that I was trying for a director’s post at the
court theatre, and had good expectations of securing the appointment in
addition to special privileges. In order to remain on good terms with
Taubert, as it was very necessary for me to do, I had to give him the most
solemn assurances that such an idea had never even entered my head, and
that I would not accept such a position if it were offered to me. On the other
hand, all my endeavours to get access to the King continued to be fruitless.
My chief mediator, to whom I always turned, was still Count Redern, and
although my attention had been called to his staunch adherence to
Meyerbeer, his extraordinary open and friendly manner always strengthened
my belief in his honesty. At last the only medium that remained open to me
was the fact that the King could not possibly stay away from the
performance of Rienzi, given at his express command, and on this
conviction I based all further hope of approaching him. Whereupon Count
Redern informed me, with an expression of deep despair, that on the very
day of the first performance the monarch would be away on a hunting party.
Once more I begged him to make very effort in his power to secure the
King’s presence, at least at the second performance, and at length my
inexhaustible patron told me that he could not make head or tail of it, but
his Majesty seemed to have conceived an utter disinclination to accede to
my wish; he himself had heard these hard words fall from the royal lips:
‘Oh bother! have you come to me again with your Rienzi?’
At this second performance I had a pleasant experience. After the
impressive second act the public showed signs of wishing to call me, and as
I went from the orchestra to the vestibule, in order to be ready if necessary,
my foot slipped on the smooth parquet, and I might have had perhaps a
serious fall had I not felt my arm grasped by a strong hand. I turned, and
recognised the Crown Prince of Prussia,[14] who had come out of his box,
and who at once seized the opportunity of inviting me to follow him to his
wife, who wished to make my acquaintance. She had only just arrived in
Berlin, and told me that she had heard my opera for the first time that
evening, and expressed her appreciation of it. She had, however, long ago
received very favourable reports of me and my artistic aims from a common
father. Without having the slightest idea how it originated, I learned, about
the middle of my stay in Berlin, from the conductor Taubert, that he had
heard on very good authority that I was trying for a director’s post at the
court theatre, and had good expectations of securing the appointment in
addition to special privileges. In order to remain on good terms with
Taubert, as it was very necessary for me to do, I had to give him the most
solemn assurances that such an idea had never even entered my head, and
that I would not accept such a position if it were offered to me. On the other
hand, all my endeavours to get access to the King continued to be fruitless.
My chief mediator, to whom I always turned, was still Count Redern, and
although my attention had been called to his staunch adherence to
Meyerbeer, his extraordinary open and friendly manner always strengthened
my belief in his honesty. At last the only medium that remained open to me
was the fact that the King could not possibly stay away from the
performance of Rienzi, given at his express command, and on this
conviction I based all further hope of approaching him. Whereupon Count
Redern informed me, with an expression of deep despair, that on the very
day of the first performance the monarch would be away on a hunting party.
Once more I begged him to make very effort in his power to secure the
King’s presence, at least at the second performance, and at length my
inexhaustible patron told me that he could not make head or tail of it, but
his Majesty seemed to have conceived an utter disinclination to accede to
my wish; he himself had heard these hard words fall from the royal lips:
‘Oh bother! have you come to me again with your Rienzi?’
At this second performance I had a pleasant experience. After the
impressive second act the public showed signs of wishing to call me, and as
I went from the orchestra to the vestibule, in order to be ready if necessary,
my foot slipped on the smooth parquet, and I might have had perhaps a
serious fall had I not felt my arm grasped by a strong hand. I turned, and
recognised the Crown Prince of Prussia,[14] who had come out of his box,
and who at once seized the opportunity of inviting me to follow him to his
wife, who wished to make my acquaintance. She had only just arrived in
Berlin, and told me that she had heard my opera for the first time that
evening, and expressed her appreciation of it. She had, however, long ago
received very favourable reports of me and my artistic aims from a common
Page 389
friend, Alwine Frommann. The whole tenor of this interview, at which the
Prince was present, was unusually friendly and pleasant.
[14] This Prince subsequently became the Emperor William the First. He was
given the title of Crown Prince in 1840 on the death of his father, Frederick
William III., as he was then heir-presumptive to his brother, Frederick William
IV., whose marriage was without issue.—EDITOR.
It was indeed my old friend Alwine who in Berlin had not only followed
all my fortunes with the greatest sympathy, but had also done all in her
power to give me consolation and courage to endure. Almost every evening,
when the day’s business made it possible, I used to visit her for an hour of
recreation, and gain strength from her ennobling conversation for the
struggle against the reverses of the following day. I was particularly pleased
by the warm and intelligent sympathy which she and our mutual friend
Werder devoted to Lohengrin, the object of all my labours at that time. On
the arrival of her friend and patroness, the Crown Princess, which had been
delayed till now, she hoped to hear something more definite as to how my
affairs stood with the King, although she intimated to me that even this
great lady was in deep disfavour, and could only bring her influence to bear
upon the King by observing the strictest etiquette. But from this source also
no news reached me till it was time for me to leave Berlin and I could
postpone my departure no longer.
As I had to conduct a third performance of Rienzi, and there still
remained a remote possibility of receiving a sudden command to Sans-
Souci, I accordingly fixed on a date which would be the very latest I could
wait to ascertain the fate of the projects I had nearest to heart. This period
passed by, and I was forced to realise that my hopes of Berlin were wholly
shattered.
I was in a very depressed state when I made up my mind to this
conclusion. I can seldom remember having been so dreadfully affected by
the influence of cold and wet weather and an eternally grey sky as during
those last wretched weeks in Berlin, when everything that I heard, in
addition to my own private anxieties, weighed upon me with a leaden
weight of discouragement.
My conversations with Hermann Franck about the social and political
situation had assumed a peculiarly gloomy tone, as the King of Prussia’s
efforts to summon a united conference had failed. I was among those who
Prince was present, was unusually friendly and pleasant.
[14] This Prince subsequently became the Emperor William the First. He was
given the title of Crown Prince in 1840 on the death of his father, Frederick
William III., as he was then heir-presumptive to his brother, Frederick William
IV., whose marriage was without issue.—EDITOR.
It was indeed my old friend Alwine who in Berlin had not only followed
all my fortunes with the greatest sympathy, but had also done all in her
power to give me consolation and courage to endure. Almost every evening,
when the day’s business made it possible, I used to visit her for an hour of
recreation, and gain strength from her ennobling conversation for the
struggle against the reverses of the following day. I was particularly pleased
by the warm and intelligent sympathy which she and our mutual friend
Werder devoted to Lohengrin, the object of all my labours at that time. On
the arrival of her friend and patroness, the Crown Princess, which had been
delayed till now, she hoped to hear something more definite as to how my
affairs stood with the King, although she intimated to me that even this
great lady was in deep disfavour, and could only bring her influence to bear
upon the King by observing the strictest etiquette. But from this source also
no news reached me till it was time for me to leave Berlin and I could
postpone my departure no longer.
As I had to conduct a third performance of Rienzi, and there still
remained a remote possibility of receiving a sudden command to Sans-
Souci, I accordingly fixed on a date which would be the very latest I could
wait to ascertain the fate of the projects I had nearest to heart. This period
passed by, and I was forced to realise that my hopes of Berlin were wholly
shattered.
I was in a very depressed state when I made up my mind to this
conclusion. I can seldom remember having been so dreadfully affected by
the influence of cold and wet weather and an eternally grey sky as during
those last wretched weeks in Berlin, when everything that I heard, in
addition to my own private anxieties, weighed upon me with a leaden
weight of discouragement.
My conversations with Hermann Franck about the social and political
situation had assumed a peculiarly gloomy tone, as the King of Prussia’s
efforts to summon a united conference had failed. I was among those who
Page 390
had at first been inclined to see a hopeful significance in this undertaking,
but it was a shock to have all the intimate details relating to the project
clearly set before me by so well informed a man as Franck. His
dispassionate views on this subject, as well as on the Prussian State in
particular, which was supposed to be representative of German intelligence,
and was universally considered to be a model of order and good
government, so completely disillusioned me and destroyed all the
favourable and hopeful opinions I had formed of it, that I felt as if I had
plunged into chaos, and realised the utter futility of expecting a prosperous
settlement of the German question from this quarter. If in the midst of my
misery in Dresden I had founded great hopes from gaining the King of
Prussia’s sympathy for my ideas, I could no longer close my eyes to the
fearful hollowness which the state of affairs disclosed to me on every side.
In this despairing mood I felt but little emotion when, on going to say
good-bye to Count Redern, he told me with a very sad face the news, which
had just arrived, of Mendelssohn’s death. I certainly did not realise this
stroke of fate, which Redern’s obvious grief first brought to my notice. At
all events, he was spared more detailed and heartfelt explanation of my own
affairs, which he had so much at heart.
The only thing that remained for me to do in Berlin was to try and make
my material success balance my material loss. For a stay of two months,
during which my wife and my sister Clara had been with me, lured on by
the hope that the production of Rienzi in Berlin would be a brilliant success,
I found my old friend, Director Küstner, by no means inclined to
compensate me. From his correspondence with me he could prove up to the
hilt that legally he had only expressed the desire for my co-operation in
studying Rienzi, but had given me no positive invitation. As I was
prevented by Count Redern’s grief over Mendelssohn’s death from going to
him for help in these trivial private concerns, there was no alternative but
for me to accept with a good grace Küstner’s beneficence in paying me on
the spot the royalties on the three performances which had already taken
place. The Dresden authorities were surprised when I found myself obliged
to beg an advance of income from them in order to conclude this brilliant
undertaking in Berlin.
As I was travelling with my wife in the most horrible weather through the
deserted country on my way home, I fell into a mood of the blackest
but it was a shock to have all the intimate details relating to the project
clearly set before me by so well informed a man as Franck. His
dispassionate views on this subject, as well as on the Prussian State in
particular, which was supposed to be representative of German intelligence,
and was universally considered to be a model of order and good
government, so completely disillusioned me and destroyed all the
favourable and hopeful opinions I had formed of it, that I felt as if I had
plunged into chaos, and realised the utter futility of expecting a prosperous
settlement of the German question from this quarter. If in the midst of my
misery in Dresden I had founded great hopes from gaining the King of
Prussia’s sympathy for my ideas, I could no longer close my eyes to the
fearful hollowness which the state of affairs disclosed to me on every side.
In this despairing mood I felt but little emotion when, on going to say
good-bye to Count Redern, he told me with a very sad face the news, which
had just arrived, of Mendelssohn’s death. I certainly did not realise this
stroke of fate, which Redern’s obvious grief first brought to my notice. At
all events, he was spared more detailed and heartfelt explanation of my own
affairs, which he had so much at heart.
The only thing that remained for me to do in Berlin was to try and make
my material success balance my material loss. For a stay of two months,
during which my wife and my sister Clara had been with me, lured on by
the hope that the production of Rienzi in Berlin would be a brilliant success,
I found my old friend, Director Küstner, by no means inclined to
compensate me. From his correspondence with me he could prove up to the
hilt that legally he had only expressed the desire for my co-operation in
studying Rienzi, but had given me no positive invitation. As I was
prevented by Count Redern’s grief over Mendelssohn’s death from going to
him for help in these trivial private concerns, there was no alternative but
for me to accept with a good grace Küstner’s beneficence in paying me on
the spot the royalties on the three performances which had already taken
place. The Dresden authorities were surprised when I found myself obliged
to beg an advance of income from them in order to conclude this brilliant
undertaking in Berlin.
As I was travelling with my wife in the most horrible weather through the
deserted country on my way home, I fell into a mood of the blackest
Page 391
despair, which I thought I might perhaps survive once in a lifetime but
never again. Nevertheless, it amused me, as I sat silently looking out of the
carriage into the grey mist, to hear my wife enter into a lively discussion
with a commercial traveller who, in the course of friendly conversation, had
spoken in a disparaging way about the ‘new opera Rienzi.’ My wife, with
great heat and even passion, corrected various mistakes made by this hostile
critic, and to her great satisfaction made him confess that he had not heard
the opera himself, but had only based his opinion upon hearsay and the
reviews. Whereupon my wife pointed out to him most earnestly that ‘he
could not possibly know whose future he might not injure by such
irresponsible comment.’
These were the only cheering and consoling impressions which I carried
back with me to Dresden, where I soon felt the direct results of the reverses
I had suffered in Berlin in the condolences of my acquaintances. The papers
had spread abroad the news that my opera had been a dismal failure. The
most painful part of the whole proceeding was that I had to meet these
expressions of pity with a cheerful countenance and the assurance that
things were by no means so bad as had been made out, but that, on the
contrary, I had had many pleasant experiences.
This unaccustomed effort placed me in a position strangely similar to that
in which I found Hiller on my return to Dresden. He had given a
performance of his new opera, Conradin von Hohenstaufen, here just about
this time. He had kept the composition of this work a secret from me, and
had hoped to make a decided hit with it after the three performances which
took place in my absence. Both the poet and the composer thought that in
this work they had combined the tendencies and effects of my Rienzi with
those of my Tannhäuser in a manner peculiarly suited to the Dresden public.
As he was just setting out for Dusseldorf, where he had been appointed
concert-director, he commended his work with great confidence to my
tender mercies, and regretted not having the power of appointing me the
conductor of it. He acknowledged that he owed his great success partly to
the wonderfully happy rendering of the male part of Conradin by my niece
Johanna. She, in her turn, told me with equal confidence that without her
Hiller’s opera would not have had such an extraordinary triumph. I was
now really anxious to see this fortunate work and its wonderful staging for
myself; and this I was able to do, as a fourth performance was announced
after Hiller and his family had left Dresden for good. When I entered the
never again. Nevertheless, it amused me, as I sat silently looking out of the
carriage into the grey mist, to hear my wife enter into a lively discussion
with a commercial traveller who, in the course of friendly conversation, had
spoken in a disparaging way about the ‘new opera Rienzi.’ My wife, with
great heat and even passion, corrected various mistakes made by this hostile
critic, and to her great satisfaction made him confess that he had not heard
the opera himself, but had only based his opinion upon hearsay and the
reviews. Whereupon my wife pointed out to him most earnestly that ‘he
could not possibly know whose future he might not injure by such
irresponsible comment.’
These were the only cheering and consoling impressions which I carried
back with me to Dresden, where I soon felt the direct results of the reverses
I had suffered in Berlin in the condolences of my acquaintances. The papers
had spread abroad the news that my opera had been a dismal failure. The
most painful part of the whole proceeding was that I had to meet these
expressions of pity with a cheerful countenance and the assurance that
things were by no means so bad as had been made out, but that, on the
contrary, I had had many pleasant experiences.
This unaccustomed effort placed me in a position strangely similar to that
in which I found Hiller on my return to Dresden. He had given a
performance of his new opera, Conradin von Hohenstaufen, here just about
this time. He had kept the composition of this work a secret from me, and
had hoped to make a decided hit with it after the three performances which
took place in my absence. Both the poet and the composer thought that in
this work they had combined the tendencies and effects of my Rienzi with
those of my Tannhäuser in a manner peculiarly suited to the Dresden public.
As he was just setting out for Dusseldorf, where he had been appointed
concert-director, he commended his work with great confidence to my
tender mercies, and regretted not having the power of appointing me the
conductor of it. He acknowledged that he owed his great success partly to
the wonderfully happy rendering of the male part of Conradin by my niece
Johanna. She, in her turn, told me with equal confidence that without her
Hiller’s opera would not have had such an extraordinary triumph. I was
now really anxious to see this fortunate work and its wonderful staging for
myself; and this I was able to do, as a fourth performance was announced
after Hiller and his family had left Dresden for good. When I entered the
Page 392
theatre at the beginning of the overture to take my place in the stalls, I was
astonished to find all the seats, with a few scarcely noticeable exceptions,
absolutely empty. At the other end of my row I saw the poet who had
written the libretto, the gentle painter Reinike. We moved, naturally,
towards the middle of the space and discussed the strange position in which
we found ourselves. He poured out melancholy complaints to me about
Hiller’s musical setting to his poetry; the secret of the mistake which Hiller
had made about the success of his work he did not explain, and was
evidently very much upset at the conspicuous failure of the opera. It was
from another quarter that I learned how it had been possible for Hiller to
deceive himself in such an extraordinary way. Frau Hiller, who was of
Polish origin, had managed at the frequent Polish gatherings which took
place in Dresden to persuade a large contingent of her countrymen, who
were keen theatre-goers, to attend her husband’s opera. On the first night
these friends, with their usual enthusiasm, incited the public to applaud, but
had themselves found so little pleasure in the work that they had stayed
away from the second performance, which was otherwise badly attended, so
that the opera could only be considered a failure. By commandeering all the
help that could possibly be got from the Poles by way of applause, every
effort was made to secure a third performance on a Sunday, when the
theatre generally filled of its own accord. This object was achieved, and the
Polish theatre aristocracy, with the charity that was habitual to them,
fulfilled their duty towards the needy couple in whose drawing-room they
had often spent such pleasant evenings.
Once more the composer was called before the curtain, and everything
went off well. Hiller thereupon placed his confidence in the verdict on the
third performance, according to which his opera was an undoubted success,
just as had been the case with my Tannhäuser. The artificiality of this
proceeding was, however, exposed by this fourth performance, at which I
was present, and at which no one was under an obligation to the departed
composer to attend. Even my niece was disgusted with it, and thought that
the best singer in the world could not make a success of such a tedious
opera. Whilst we were watching this miserable performance I managed to
point out to the poet some weaknesses and faults that were to be found in
the subject-matter. The latter reported my criticisms to Hiller, whereupon I
received a warm and friendly letter from Dusseldorf, in which Hiller
acknowledged the mistake he had made in rejecting my advice on this
astonished to find all the seats, with a few scarcely noticeable exceptions,
absolutely empty. At the other end of my row I saw the poet who had
written the libretto, the gentle painter Reinike. We moved, naturally,
towards the middle of the space and discussed the strange position in which
we found ourselves. He poured out melancholy complaints to me about
Hiller’s musical setting to his poetry; the secret of the mistake which Hiller
had made about the success of his work he did not explain, and was
evidently very much upset at the conspicuous failure of the opera. It was
from another quarter that I learned how it had been possible for Hiller to
deceive himself in such an extraordinary way. Frau Hiller, who was of
Polish origin, had managed at the frequent Polish gatherings which took
place in Dresden to persuade a large contingent of her countrymen, who
were keen theatre-goers, to attend her husband’s opera. On the first night
these friends, with their usual enthusiasm, incited the public to applaud, but
had themselves found so little pleasure in the work that they had stayed
away from the second performance, which was otherwise badly attended, so
that the opera could only be considered a failure. By commandeering all the
help that could possibly be got from the Poles by way of applause, every
effort was made to secure a third performance on a Sunday, when the
theatre generally filled of its own accord. This object was achieved, and the
Polish theatre aristocracy, with the charity that was habitual to them,
fulfilled their duty towards the needy couple in whose drawing-room they
had often spent such pleasant evenings.
Once more the composer was called before the curtain, and everything
went off well. Hiller thereupon placed his confidence in the verdict on the
third performance, according to which his opera was an undoubted success,
just as had been the case with my Tannhäuser. The artificiality of this
proceeding was, however, exposed by this fourth performance, at which I
was present, and at which no one was under an obligation to the departed
composer to attend. Even my niece was disgusted with it, and thought that
the best singer in the world could not make a success of such a tedious
opera. Whilst we were watching this miserable performance I managed to
point out to the poet some weaknesses and faults that were to be found in
the subject-matter. The latter reported my criticisms to Hiller, whereupon I
received a warm and friendly letter from Dusseldorf, in which Hiller
acknowledged the mistake he had made in rejecting my advice on this
Page 393
point. He gave me plainly to understand that it was not too late to alter the
opera according to my suggestions; I should thus have had the inestimable
benefit of having such an obviously well-intentioned, and, in its way, so
significant, a work in the repertoire, but I never got so far as that.
On the other hand, I experienced the small satisfaction of hearing the
news that two performances of my Rienzi had taken place in Berlin, for the
success of which Conductor Taubert, as he informed me himself, thought he
had won some credit on account of the extremely effective combinations he
had arranged. In spite of this, I was absolutely convinced that I must
abandon all hope of any lasting and profitable success from Berlin, and I
could no longer hide from Lüttichau that, if I were to continue in the
discharge of my duties with the necessary good spirits, I must insist on a
rise of salary, as, beyond my regular income, I could not rely on any
substantial success wherewith to meet my unlucky publishing transactions.
My income was so small that I could not even live on it, but I asked nothing
more than to be placed on an equal footing with my colleague Reissiger, a
prospect which had been held out to me from the beginning.
At this juncture Lüttichau saw a favourable opportunity for making me
feel my dependence on his goodwill, which could only be secured by my
showing due deference to his wishes. After I had laid my case before the
King, at a personal interview, and asked for the favour of the moderate
increase in income which was my object, Lüttichau promised to make the
report he was obliged to give of me as favourable as possible. How great
was my consternation and humiliation when one day he opened our
interview by telling me that his report had come back from the King. In it
was set forth that I had unfortunately overestimated my talent on account of
the foolish praise of various friends in a high position (among whom he
counted Frau v. Konneritz), and had thus been led to consider that I had
quite as good a right to success as Meyerbeer. I had thereby caused such
serious offence that it might, perhaps, be considered advisable to dismiss
me altogether. On the other hand, my industry and my praiseworthy
performance with regard to the revision of Gluck’s Iphigenia, which had
been brought to the notice of the management, might justify my being given
another chance, in which case my material condition must be given due
consideration. At this point I could read no further, and stupefied by
surprise I gave my patron back the paper. He tried at once to remove the
obviously bad impression it had made upon me by telling me that my wish
opera according to my suggestions; I should thus have had the inestimable
benefit of having such an obviously well-intentioned, and, in its way, so
significant, a work in the repertoire, but I never got so far as that.
On the other hand, I experienced the small satisfaction of hearing the
news that two performances of my Rienzi had taken place in Berlin, for the
success of which Conductor Taubert, as he informed me himself, thought he
had won some credit on account of the extremely effective combinations he
had arranged. In spite of this, I was absolutely convinced that I must
abandon all hope of any lasting and profitable success from Berlin, and I
could no longer hide from Lüttichau that, if I were to continue in the
discharge of my duties with the necessary good spirits, I must insist on a
rise of salary, as, beyond my regular income, I could not rely on any
substantial success wherewith to meet my unlucky publishing transactions.
My income was so small that I could not even live on it, but I asked nothing
more than to be placed on an equal footing with my colleague Reissiger, a
prospect which had been held out to me from the beginning.
At this juncture Lüttichau saw a favourable opportunity for making me
feel my dependence on his goodwill, which could only be secured by my
showing due deference to his wishes. After I had laid my case before the
King, at a personal interview, and asked for the favour of the moderate
increase in income which was my object, Lüttichau promised to make the
report he was obliged to give of me as favourable as possible. How great
was my consternation and humiliation when one day he opened our
interview by telling me that his report had come back from the King. In it
was set forth that I had unfortunately overestimated my talent on account of
the foolish praise of various friends in a high position (among whom he
counted Frau v. Konneritz), and had thus been led to consider that I had
quite as good a right to success as Meyerbeer. I had thereby caused such
serious offence that it might, perhaps, be considered advisable to dismiss
me altogether. On the other hand, my industry and my praiseworthy
performance with regard to the revision of Gluck’s Iphigenia, which had
been brought to the notice of the management, might justify my being given
another chance, in which case my material condition must be given due
consideration. At this point I could read no further, and stupefied by
surprise I gave my patron back the paper. He tried at once to remove the
obviously bad impression it had made upon me by telling me that my wish
Page 394
had been granted, and I could draw the nine hundred marks belonging to me
at once from the bank. I took my leave in silence, and pondered over what
course of action I must pursue in face of this disgrace, as it was quite out of
the question for me to accept the nine hundred marks.
But in the midst of these adversities a visit of the King of Prussia to
Dresden was one day announced, and at the same time by his special
request a performance of Tannhäuser was arranged. He really did make his
appearance in the theatre at this performance in the company of the royal
family of Saxony, and stayed with apparent interest from beginning to end.
On this occasion the King gave a curious explanation for having stayed
away from the performances of Rienzi in Berlin, which was afterwards
reported to me. He said he had denied himself the pleasure of hearing one
of my operas in Berlin, because it was important to get a good impression
of them, and he knew that in his own theatre they would only be badly
produced. This strange event had, at any rate, the result of giving me back
sufficient self-confidence to accept the nine hundred marks of which I was
in such desperate need.
Lüttichau also seemed to make a point of winning back my trust to some
extent, and I gathered from his calm friendliness that I must suppose this
wholly uncultured man had no consciousness of the outrage he had done
me. He returned to the idea of having orchestral concerts, in accordance
with the suggestions I had made in my rejected report on the orchestra, and
in order to induce me to arrange such musical performances in the theatre,
said the initiative had come from the management and not from the
orchestra itself. As soon as I discovered that the profits were to go to the
orchestra I willingly entered into the plan. By a special device of my own
the stage of the theatre was made into a concert-hall (afterwards considered
first-class) by means of a sounding board enclosing the whole orchestra,
which proved a great success. In future six performances were to take place
during the winter months. This time, however, as it was the end of the year,
and we only had the second half of the winter before us, subscription tickets
were issued for only three concerts, and the whole available space in the
theatre was filled by the public. I found the preparations for this fairly
diverting, and entered upon the fateful year 1848 in a rather more
reconciled and amiable frame of mind.
at once from the bank. I took my leave in silence, and pondered over what
course of action I must pursue in face of this disgrace, as it was quite out of
the question for me to accept the nine hundred marks.
But in the midst of these adversities a visit of the King of Prussia to
Dresden was one day announced, and at the same time by his special
request a performance of Tannhäuser was arranged. He really did make his
appearance in the theatre at this performance in the company of the royal
family of Saxony, and stayed with apparent interest from beginning to end.
On this occasion the King gave a curious explanation for having stayed
away from the performances of Rienzi in Berlin, which was afterwards
reported to me. He said he had denied himself the pleasure of hearing one
of my operas in Berlin, because it was important to get a good impression
of them, and he knew that in his own theatre they would only be badly
produced. This strange event had, at any rate, the result of giving me back
sufficient self-confidence to accept the nine hundred marks of which I was
in such desperate need.
Lüttichau also seemed to make a point of winning back my trust to some
extent, and I gathered from his calm friendliness that I must suppose this
wholly uncultured man had no consciousness of the outrage he had done
me. He returned to the idea of having orchestral concerts, in accordance
with the suggestions I had made in my rejected report on the orchestra, and
in order to induce me to arrange such musical performances in the theatre,
said the initiative had come from the management and not from the
orchestra itself. As soon as I discovered that the profits were to go to the
orchestra I willingly entered into the plan. By a special device of my own
the stage of the theatre was made into a concert-hall (afterwards considered
first-class) by means of a sounding board enclosing the whole orchestra,
which proved a great success. In future six performances were to take place
during the winter months. This time, however, as it was the end of the year,
and we only had the second half of the winter before us, subscription tickets
were issued for only three concerts, and the whole available space in the
theatre was filled by the public. I found the preparations for this fairly
diverting, and entered upon the fateful year 1848 in a rather more
reconciled and amiable frame of mind.
Page 395
Early in the New Year the first of these orchestral concerts took place,
and brought me much popularity on account of its unusual programme. I
had discovered that if any real significance were to be given to these
concerts, in distinction to those consisting of heterogeneous scraps of music
of every different species under the sun, and which are so opposed to all
serious artistic taste, we could only afford to give two kinds of genuine
music alternately if a good effect was to be produced. Accordingly between
two symphonies I placed one or two longer vocal pieces, which were not to
be heard elsewhere, and these were the only items in the whole concert.
After the Mozart Symphony in D major, I made all the musicians move
from their places to make room for an imposing choir, which had to sing
Palestrina’s Stabat Mater, from an adaptation of the original recitative,
which I had carefully revised, and Bach’s Motet for eight voices: Singet
dem Herrn ein neues Lied (‘Sing unto the Lord a new song’); thereupon I
let the orchestra again take its place to play Beethoven’s Sinfonia Eroica,
and with that to end the concert.
This success was very encouraging, and disclosed to me a somewhat
consoling prospect of increasing my influence as musical conductor at a
time when my disgust was daily growing stronger at the constant meddling
with our opera repertoire, which made me lose more and more influence as
compared with the wishes of my would-be prima donna niece, whom even
Tichatschek supported. Immediately on my return from Berlin I had begun
the orchestration of Lohengrin, and in all other respects had given myself
up to greater resignation, which made me feel I could face my fate calmly,
when I suddenly received a very disturbing piece of news.
In the beginning of February my mother’s death was announced to me. I
at once hastened to her funeral at Leipzig, and was filled with deep emotion
and joy at the wonderfully calm and sweet expression of her face. She had
passed the latter years of her life, which had before been so active and
restless, in cheerful ease, and at the end in peaceful and almost childlike
happiness. On her deathbed she exclaimed in humble modesty, and with a
bright smile on her face: ‘Oh! how beautiful! how lovely! how divine! Why
do I deserve such favour?’ It was a bitterly cold morning when we lowered
the coffin into the grave in the churchyard, and the hard, frozen lumps of
earth which we scattered on the lid, instead of the customary handful of
dust, frightened me by the loud noise they made. On the way home to the
house of my brother-in-law, Hermann Brockhaus, where the whole family
and brought me much popularity on account of its unusual programme. I
had discovered that if any real significance were to be given to these
concerts, in distinction to those consisting of heterogeneous scraps of music
of every different species under the sun, and which are so opposed to all
serious artistic taste, we could only afford to give two kinds of genuine
music alternately if a good effect was to be produced. Accordingly between
two symphonies I placed one or two longer vocal pieces, which were not to
be heard elsewhere, and these were the only items in the whole concert.
After the Mozart Symphony in D major, I made all the musicians move
from their places to make room for an imposing choir, which had to sing
Palestrina’s Stabat Mater, from an adaptation of the original recitative,
which I had carefully revised, and Bach’s Motet for eight voices: Singet
dem Herrn ein neues Lied (‘Sing unto the Lord a new song’); thereupon I
let the orchestra again take its place to play Beethoven’s Sinfonia Eroica,
and with that to end the concert.
This success was very encouraging, and disclosed to me a somewhat
consoling prospect of increasing my influence as musical conductor at a
time when my disgust was daily growing stronger at the constant meddling
with our opera repertoire, which made me lose more and more influence as
compared with the wishes of my would-be prima donna niece, whom even
Tichatschek supported. Immediately on my return from Berlin I had begun
the orchestration of Lohengrin, and in all other respects had given myself
up to greater resignation, which made me feel I could face my fate calmly,
when I suddenly received a very disturbing piece of news.
In the beginning of February my mother’s death was announced to me. I
at once hastened to her funeral at Leipzig, and was filled with deep emotion
and joy at the wonderfully calm and sweet expression of her face. She had
passed the latter years of her life, which had before been so active and
restless, in cheerful ease, and at the end in peaceful and almost childlike
happiness. On her deathbed she exclaimed in humble modesty, and with a
bright smile on her face: ‘Oh! how beautiful! how lovely! how divine! Why
do I deserve such favour?’ It was a bitterly cold morning when we lowered
the coffin into the grave in the churchyard, and the hard, frozen lumps of
earth which we scattered on the lid, instead of the customary handful of
dust, frightened me by the loud noise they made. On the way home to the
house of my brother-in-law, Hermann Brockhaus, where the whole family
Page 396
were to gather together for an hour, Laube, of whom my mother had been
very fond, was my only companion. He expressed his anxiety at my
unusually exhausted appearance, and when he afterwards accompanied me
to the station, we discussed the unbearable burden which seemed to us to lie
like a dead weight on every noble effort made to resist the tendency of the
time to sink into utter worthlessness. On my return to Dresden the
realisation of my complete loneliness came over me for the first time with
full consciousness, as I could not help knowing that with the loss of my
mother every natural bond of union was loosened with my brothers and
sisters, each of whom was taken up with his or her own family affairs. So I
plunged dully and coldly into the only thing which could cheer and warm
me, the working out of my Lohengrin and my studies of German antiquity.
Thus dawned the last days of February, which were to plunge Europe
once more into revolution. I was among those who least expected a
probable or even possible overthrow of the political world. My first
knowledge of such things had been gained in my youth at the time of the
July Revolution, and the long and peaceful reaction that followed it. Since
then I had become acquainted with Paris, and from all the signs of public
life which I saw there, I thought all that had occurred had been merely the
preliminaries of a great revolutionary movement. I had been present at the
erection of the forts detaches around Paris, which Louis Philippe had
carried out, and been instructed about the strategic value of the various
fixed sentries scattered about Paris, and I agreed with those who considered
that everything was ready to make even an attempt at a rising on the part of
the populace of Paris quite impossible. When, therefore, the Swiss War of
Separation at the end of the previous year, and the successful Sicilian
Revolution at the beginning of the New Year, turned all men’s eyes in great
excitement to watch the effect of these risings on Paris, I did not take the
slightest interest in the hopes and fears which were aroused. News of the
growing restlessness in the French capital did indeed reach us, but I
disputed Röckel’s belief that any significance could be attached to it. I was
sitting in the conductor’s desk at a rehearsal of Martha when, during an
interval, Röckel, with the peculiar joy of being in the right, brought me the
news of Louis Philippe’s flight, and the proclamation of the Republic in
Paris. This made a strange and almost astonishing impression on me,
although at the same time the doubt as to the true significance of these
events made it possible for me to smile to myself. I too caught the fever of
very fond, was my only companion. He expressed his anxiety at my
unusually exhausted appearance, and when he afterwards accompanied me
to the station, we discussed the unbearable burden which seemed to us to lie
like a dead weight on every noble effort made to resist the tendency of the
time to sink into utter worthlessness. On my return to Dresden the
realisation of my complete loneliness came over me for the first time with
full consciousness, as I could not help knowing that with the loss of my
mother every natural bond of union was loosened with my brothers and
sisters, each of whom was taken up with his or her own family affairs. So I
plunged dully and coldly into the only thing which could cheer and warm
me, the working out of my Lohengrin and my studies of German antiquity.
Thus dawned the last days of February, which were to plunge Europe
once more into revolution. I was among those who least expected a
probable or even possible overthrow of the political world. My first
knowledge of such things had been gained in my youth at the time of the
July Revolution, and the long and peaceful reaction that followed it. Since
then I had become acquainted with Paris, and from all the signs of public
life which I saw there, I thought all that had occurred had been merely the
preliminaries of a great revolutionary movement. I had been present at the
erection of the forts detaches around Paris, which Louis Philippe had
carried out, and been instructed about the strategic value of the various
fixed sentries scattered about Paris, and I agreed with those who considered
that everything was ready to make even an attempt at a rising on the part of
the populace of Paris quite impossible. When, therefore, the Swiss War of
Separation at the end of the previous year, and the successful Sicilian
Revolution at the beginning of the New Year, turned all men’s eyes in great
excitement to watch the effect of these risings on Paris, I did not take the
slightest interest in the hopes and fears which were aroused. News of the
growing restlessness in the French capital did indeed reach us, but I
disputed Röckel’s belief that any significance could be attached to it. I was
sitting in the conductor’s desk at a rehearsal of Martha when, during an
interval, Röckel, with the peculiar joy of being in the right, brought me the
news of Louis Philippe’s flight, and the proclamation of the Republic in
Paris. This made a strange and almost astonishing impression on me,
although at the same time the doubt as to the true significance of these
events made it possible for me to smile to myself. I too caught the fever of
Page 397
excitement which had spread everywhere. The German March days were
coming, and from all directions ever more alarming news kept coming in.
Even within the narrow confines of my native Saxony serious petitions
were framed, which the King withstood for a long time; even he was
deceived, in a way which he was soon to acknowledge, as to the meaning of
this commotion and the temper that prevailed in the country.
On the evening of one of these really anxious days, when the very air was
heavy and full of thunder, we gave our third great orchestral concert, at
which the King and his court were present, as on the two previous
occasions. For the opening of this one I had chosen Mendelssohn’s
Symphony in A minor, which I had played on the occasion of his funeral.
The mood of this piece, which even in the would-be joyful phrases is
always tenderly melancholy, corresponded strangely with the anxiety and
depression of the whole audience, which was more particularly accentuated
in the demeanour of the royal family. I did not conceal from Lipinsky, the
leader of the orchestra, my regret at the mistake I had made in the
arrangement of that day’s programme, as Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony, also
in a minor key, was to follow this minor symphony. With a merry twinkle in
his eyes the eccentric Pole comforted me by exclaiming: ‘Oh, let us play
only the first two movements of the Symphony in C minor, then no one will
know whether we have played Mendelssohn in the major or the minor key.’
Fortunately before these two movements began, to our great surprise, a loud
shout was raised by some patriotic spirit in the middle of the audience, who
called out ‘Long live the King!’ and the cry was promptly repeated with
unusual enthusiasm and energy on all sides. Lipinsky was perfectly right:
the symphony, with the passionate and stormy excitement of the first theme,
swelled out like a hurricane of rejoicing, and had seldom produced such an
effect on the audience as on that night. This was the last of the newly
inaugurated concerts that I ever conducted in Dresden.
Shortly after this the inevitable political changes took place. The King
dismissed his ministry and elected a new one, consisting partly of Liberals
and partly even of really enthusiastic Democrats, who at once proclaimed
the well-known regulations, which are the same all over the world, for
founding a thoroughly democratic constitution. I was really touched by this
result, and by the heartfelt joy which was evident among the whole
population, and I would have given much to have been able to gain access
to the King, and convince myself of his hearty confidence in the people’s
coming, and from all directions ever more alarming news kept coming in.
Even within the narrow confines of my native Saxony serious petitions
were framed, which the King withstood for a long time; even he was
deceived, in a way which he was soon to acknowledge, as to the meaning of
this commotion and the temper that prevailed in the country.
On the evening of one of these really anxious days, when the very air was
heavy and full of thunder, we gave our third great orchestral concert, at
which the King and his court were present, as on the two previous
occasions. For the opening of this one I had chosen Mendelssohn’s
Symphony in A minor, which I had played on the occasion of his funeral.
The mood of this piece, which even in the would-be joyful phrases is
always tenderly melancholy, corresponded strangely with the anxiety and
depression of the whole audience, which was more particularly accentuated
in the demeanour of the royal family. I did not conceal from Lipinsky, the
leader of the orchestra, my regret at the mistake I had made in the
arrangement of that day’s programme, as Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony, also
in a minor key, was to follow this minor symphony. With a merry twinkle in
his eyes the eccentric Pole comforted me by exclaiming: ‘Oh, let us play
only the first two movements of the Symphony in C minor, then no one will
know whether we have played Mendelssohn in the major or the minor key.’
Fortunately before these two movements began, to our great surprise, a loud
shout was raised by some patriotic spirit in the middle of the audience, who
called out ‘Long live the King!’ and the cry was promptly repeated with
unusual enthusiasm and energy on all sides. Lipinsky was perfectly right:
the symphony, with the passionate and stormy excitement of the first theme,
swelled out like a hurricane of rejoicing, and had seldom produced such an
effect on the audience as on that night. This was the last of the newly
inaugurated concerts that I ever conducted in Dresden.
Shortly after this the inevitable political changes took place. The King
dismissed his ministry and elected a new one, consisting partly of Liberals
and partly even of really enthusiastic Democrats, who at once proclaimed
the well-known regulations, which are the same all over the world, for
founding a thoroughly democratic constitution. I was really touched by this
result, and by the heartfelt joy which was evident among the whole
population, and I would have given much to have been able to gain access
to the King, and convince myself of his hearty confidence in the people’s
Page 398
love for him, which seemed to me so desirable a consummation. In the
evening the town was gaily illuminated, and the King drove through the
streets in an open carriage. In the greatest excitement I went out among the
dense crowds and followed his movements, often running where I thought it
likely that a particularly hearty shout might rejoice and reconcile the
monarch’s heart. My wife was quite frightened when she saw me come
back late at night, tired out and very hoarse from shouting.
The events which took place in Vienna and Berlin, with their apparently
momentous results, only moved me as interesting newspaper reports, and
the meeting of a Frankfort parliament in the place of the dissolved
Bundestag sounded strangely pleasant in my ears. Yet all these significant
occurrences could not tear me for a single day from my regular hours of
work. With immense, almost overweening satisfaction, I finished, in the last
days of this eventful and historic month of March, the score of Lohengrin
with the orchestration of the music up to the vanishing of the Knight of the
Holy Grail into the remote and mystic distance.
About this time a young Englishwomen, Madame Jessie Laussot, who
had married a Frenchman in Bordeaux, one day presented herself at my
house in the company of Karl Ritter, who was barely eighteen years of age.
This young man, who was born in Russia of German parents, was a member
of one of those northern families who had settled down permanently in
Dresden, on account of the pleasant artistic atmosphere of that place. I
remembered that I had seen him once before not long after the first
performance of Tannhäuser, when he asked me for my autograph for a copy
of the score of that opera, which was on sale at the music-shop. I now
learned that this copy really belonged to Frau Laussot, who had been
present at those performances, and who was now introduced to me.
Overcome with shyness, the young lady expressed her admiration in a way I
had never experienced before, and at the same time told me how great was
her regret at being called away by family affairs from her favourite home in
Dresden with the Ritter family, who, she gave me to understand, were
deeply devoted to me. It was with a strange, and in its way quite a new,
sensation that I bade farewell to this young lady. This was the first time
since my meeting with Alwine Frommann and Werder, when the Fliegender
Holländer was produced, that I came across this sympathetic tone, which
seemed to come like an echo from some old familiar past, but which I never
heard close at hand. I invited young Ritter to come and see me whenever he
evening the town was gaily illuminated, and the King drove through the
streets in an open carriage. In the greatest excitement I went out among the
dense crowds and followed his movements, often running where I thought it
likely that a particularly hearty shout might rejoice and reconcile the
monarch’s heart. My wife was quite frightened when she saw me come
back late at night, tired out and very hoarse from shouting.
The events which took place in Vienna and Berlin, with their apparently
momentous results, only moved me as interesting newspaper reports, and
the meeting of a Frankfort parliament in the place of the dissolved
Bundestag sounded strangely pleasant in my ears. Yet all these significant
occurrences could not tear me for a single day from my regular hours of
work. With immense, almost overweening satisfaction, I finished, in the last
days of this eventful and historic month of March, the score of Lohengrin
with the orchestration of the music up to the vanishing of the Knight of the
Holy Grail into the remote and mystic distance.
About this time a young Englishwomen, Madame Jessie Laussot, who
had married a Frenchman in Bordeaux, one day presented herself at my
house in the company of Karl Ritter, who was barely eighteen years of age.
This young man, who was born in Russia of German parents, was a member
of one of those northern families who had settled down permanently in
Dresden, on account of the pleasant artistic atmosphere of that place. I
remembered that I had seen him once before not long after the first
performance of Tannhäuser, when he asked me for my autograph for a copy
of the score of that opera, which was on sale at the music-shop. I now
learned that this copy really belonged to Frau Laussot, who had been
present at those performances, and who was now introduced to me.
Overcome with shyness, the young lady expressed her admiration in a way I
had never experienced before, and at the same time told me how great was
her regret at being called away by family affairs from her favourite home in
Dresden with the Ritter family, who, she gave me to understand, were
deeply devoted to me. It was with a strange, and in its way quite a new,
sensation that I bade farewell to this young lady. This was the first time
since my meeting with Alwine Frommann and Werder, when the Fliegender
Holländer was produced, that I came across this sympathetic tone, which
seemed to come like an echo from some old familiar past, but which I never
heard close at hand. I invited young Ritter to come and see me whenever he
Page 399
liked, and to accompany me sometimes on my walks. His extraordinary
shyness, however, seemed to prevent him from doing this, and I only
remember seeing him very occasionally at my house. He used to turn up
more often with Hans von Bulow, whom he seemed to know pretty well,
and who had already entered the Leipzig University as a student of law.
This well-informed and talkative young man showed his warm and hearty
devotion to me more openly, and I felt bound to reciprocate his affection.
He was the first person who made me realise the genuine character of the
new political enthusiasm. On his hat, as well as on his father’s, the black,
red, and gold cockade was paraded before my eyes.
Now that I had finished my Lohengrin, and had leisure to study the
course of events, I could no longer help myself sympathising with the
ferment aroused by the birth of German ideals and the hopes attached to
their realisation. My old friend Franck had already imbued me with a fairly
sound political judgment, and, like many others, I had grave doubts as to
whether the German parliament now assembling would serve any useful
purpose. Nevertheless, the temper of the populace, of which there could be
no question, although it might not have been given very obvious expression,
and the belief, everywhere prevalent, that it was impossible to return to the
old conditions, could not fail to exercise its influence upon me. But I
wanted actions instead of words, and actions which would force our princes
to break for ever with their old traditions, which were so detrimental to the
cause of the German commonwealth. With this object I felt inspired to write
a popular appeal in verse, calling upon the German princes and peoples to
inaugurate a great crusade against Russia, as the country which had been
the prime instigator of that policy in Germany which had so fatally
separated the monarchs from their subjects. One of the verses ran as
follows:—
The old fight against the East
Returns again to-day.
The people’s sword must not rust
Who freedom wish for aye.
As I had no connection with political journals, and had learned by chance
that Berthold Auerbach was on the staff of a paper in Mannheim, where the
waves of revolution ran high, I sent him my poem with the request to do
whatever he thought best with it, and from that day to this I have never
heard or seen anything of it.
shyness, however, seemed to prevent him from doing this, and I only
remember seeing him very occasionally at my house. He used to turn up
more often with Hans von Bulow, whom he seemed to know pretty well,
and who had already entered the Leipzig University as a student of law.
This well-informed and talkative young man showed his warm and hearty
devotion to me more openly, and I felt bound to reciprocate his affection.
He was the first person who made me realise the genuine character of the
new political enthusiasm. On his hat, as well as on his father’s, the black,
red, and gold cockade was paraded before my eyes.
Now that I had finished my Lohengrin, and had leisure to study the
course of events, I could no longer help myself sympathising with the
ferment aroused by the birth of German ideals and the hopes attached to
their realisation. My old friend Franck had already imbued me with a fairly
sound political judgment, and, like many others, I had grave doubts as to
whether the German parliament now assembling would serve any useful
purpose. Nevertheless, the temper of the populace, of which there could be
no question, although it might not have been given very obvious expression,
and the belief, everywhere prevalent, that it was impossible to return to the
old conditions, could not fail to exercise its influence upon me. But I
wanted actions instead of words, and actions which would force our princes
to break for ever with their old traditions, which were so detrimental to the
cause of the German commonwealth. With this object I felt inspired to write
a popular appeal in verse, calling upon the German princes and peoples to
inaugurate a great crusade against Russia, as the country which had been
the prime instigator of that policy in Germany which had so fatally
separated the monarchs from their subjects. One of the verses ran as
follows:—
The old fight against the East
Returns again to-day.
The people’s sword must not rust
Who freedom wish for aye.
As I had no connection with political journals, and had learned by chance
that Berthold Auerbach was on the staff of a paper in Mannheim, where the
waves of revolution ran high, I sent him my poem with the request to do
whatever he thought best with it, and from that day to this I have never
heard or seen anything of it.
Page 400
Whilst the Frankfort Parliament continued to sit on from day to day, and
it seemed idle to conjecture whither this big talk by small men would lead, I
was much impressed by the news which reached us from Vienna. In the
May of this year an attempt at a reaction, such as had succeeded in Naples
and remained indecisive in Paris, had been triumphantly nipped in the bud
by the enthusiasm and energy of the Viennese people under the leadership
of the students’ band, who had acted with such unexpected firmness. I had
arrived at the conclusion that, in matters directly concerning the people, no
reliance could be placed on reason or wisdom, but only on sheer force
supported by fanaticism or absolute necessity; but the course of events in
Vienna, where I saw the youth of the educated classes working side by side
with the labouring man, filled me with peculiar enthusiasm, to which I gave
expression in another popular appeal in verse. This I sent to the
Oesterreichischen Zeitung, where it was printed in their columns with my
full signature.
In Dresden two political unions had been formed, as a result of the great
changes that had taken place. The first was called the Deutscher Verein
(German Union), whose programme aimed at ‘a constitutional monarchy on
the broadest democratic foundation.’ The names of its principal leaders,
among which, in spite of its broad democratic foundation, my friends
Eduard Devrient and Professor Rietschel had the courage openly to appear,
guaranteed the safety of its objects. This union, which tried to include every
element that regarded a real revolution with abhorrence, conjured into
existence an opposition club which called itself the Vaterlands-Verein
(Patriotic Union). In this the ‘democratic foundation’ seemed to be the chief
basis, and the ‘constitutional monarchy’ only provided the necessary cloak.
Röckel canvassed passionately for the latter, as he seemed to have lost all
confidence in the monarchy. The poor fellow was, indeed, in a very bad
way. He had long ago given up all hope of rising to any position in the
musical world; his directorship had become pure drudgery, and was,
unfortunately, so badly paid that he could not possibly keep himself and his
yearly increasing family on the income he derived from his post. He always
had an unconquerable aversion from teaching, which was a fairly profitable
employment in Dresden among the many wealthy visitors. So he went on
from bad to worse, running miserably into debt, and for a long time saw no
hope for his position as the father of a family except in emigration to
America, where he thought he could secure a livelihood for himself and his
it seemed idle to conjecture whither this big talk by small men would lead, I
was much impressed by the news which reached us from Vienna. In the
May of this year an attempt at a reaction, such as had succeeded in Naples
and remained indecisive in Paris, had been triumphantly nipped in the bud
by the enthusiasm and energy of the Viennese people under the leadership
of the students’ band, who had acted with such unexpected firmness. I had
arrived at the conclusion that, in matters directly concerning the people, no
reliance could be placed on reason or wisdom, but only on sheer force
supported by fanaticism or absolute necessity; but the course of events in
Vienna, where I saw the youth of the educated classes working side by side
with the labouring man, filled me with peculiar enthusiasm, to which I gave
expression in another popular appeal in verse. This I sent to the
Oesterreichischen Zeitung, where it was printed in their columns with my
full signature.
In Dresden two political unions had been formed, as a result of the great
changes that had taken place. The first was called the Deutscher Verein
(German Union), whose programme aimed at ‘a constitutional monarchy on
the broadest democratic foundation.’ The names of its principal leaders,
among which, in spite of its broad democratic foundation, my friends
Eduard Devrient and Professor Rietschel had the courage openly to appear,
guaranteed the safety of its objects. This union, which tried to include every
element that regarded a real revolution with abhorrence, conjured into
existence an opposition club which called itself the Vaterlands-Verein
(Patriotic Union). In this the ‘democratic foundation’ seemed to be the chief
basis, and the ‘constitutional monarchy’ only provided the necessary cloak.
Röckel canvassed passionately for the latter, as he seemed to have lost all
confidence in the monarchy. The poor fellow was, indeed, in a very bad
way. He had long ago given up all hope of rising to any position in the
musical world; his directorship had become pure drudgery, and was,
unfortunately, so badly paid that he could not possibly keep himself and his
yearly increasing family on the income he derived from his post. He always
had an unconquerable aversion from teaching, which was a fairly profitable
employment in Dresden among the many wealthy visitors. So he went on
from bad to worse, running miserably into debt, and for a long time saw no
hope for his position as the father of a family except in emigration to
America, where he thought he could secure a livelihood for himself and his
Page 401
dependants by manual labour, and for his practical mind by working as a
farmer, from which class he had originally sprung. This, though tedious,
would at least be certain. On our walks he had of late been entertaining me
almost exclusively with ideas he had gleaned from reading books on
farming, doctrines which he applied with zeal to the improvement of his
encumbered position. This was the mood in which the Revolution of 1848
found him, and he immediately went over to the extreme socialist side,
which, owing to the example set by Paris, threatened to become serious.
Every one who knew him was utterly taken aback at the apparently vital
change which had so suddenly taken place in him, when he declared that he
had at last found his real vocation—that of an agitator.
His persuasive faculties, on which, however, he could not rely
sufficiently for platform purposes, developed in private intercourse into
stupefying energy. It was impossible to stop his flow of language with any
objection, and those he could not draw over to his cause he cast aside for
ever. In his enthusiasm about the problems which occupied his mind day
and night, he sharpened his intellect into a weapon capable of demolishing
every foolish objection, and suddenly stood in our midst like a preacher in
the wilderness. He was at home in every department of knowledge. The
Vaterlands-Verein had elected a committee for carrying into execution a
plan for arming the populace; this included Röckel and other thoroughgoing
democrats, and, in addition, certain military experts, among whom was my
old friend Hermann Muller, the lieutenant of the Guards who had once been
engaged to Schroder-Devrient. He and another officer named Zichlinsky
were the only members of the Saxon army who joined the political
movement. The part I played in the meetings of this committee, as in
everything else, was dictated by artistic motives. As far as I can remember,
the details of this plan, which at last became a nuisance, afforded very
sound foundation for a genuine arming of the people, though it was
impossible to carry it out during the political crisis.
My interest and enthusiasm about the social and political problems which
were occupying the whole world increased every day, until public meetings
and private intercourse, and the shallow platitudes which formed the staple
eloquence of the orators of the day, proved to me the terrible shallowness of
the whole movement.
farmer, from which class he had originally sprung. This, though tedious,
would at least be certain. On our walks he had of late been entertaining me
almost exclusively with ideas he had gleaned from reading books on
farming, doctrines which he applied with zeal to the improvement of his
encumbered position. This was the mood in which the Revolution of 1848
found him, and he immediately went over to the extreme socialist side,
which, owing to the example set by Paris, threatened to become serious.
Every one who knew him was utterly taken aback at the apparently vital
change which had so suddenly taken place in him, when he declared that he
had at last found his real vocation—that of an agitator.
His persuasive faculties, on which, however, he could not rely
sufficiently for platform purposes, developed in private intercourse into
stupefying energy. It was impossible to stop his flow of language with any
objection, and those he could not draw over to his cause he cast aside for
ever. In his enthusiasm about the problems which occupied his mind day
and night, he sharpened his intellect into a weapon capable of demolishing
every foolish objection, and suddenly stood in our midst like a preacher in
the wilderness. He was at home in every department of knowledge. The
Vaterlands-Verein had elected a committee for carrying into execution a
plan for arming the populace; this included Röckel and other thoroughgoing
democrats, and, in addition, certain military experts, among whom was my
old friend Hermann Muller, the lieutenant of the Guards who had once been
engaged to Schroder-Devrient. He and another officer named Zichlinsky
were the only members of the Saxon army who joined the political
movement. The part I played in the meetings of this committee, as in
everything else, was dictated by artistic motives. As far as I can remember,
the details of this plan, which at last became a nuisance, afforded very
sound foundation for a genuine arming of the people, though it was
impossible to carry it out during the political crisis.
My interest and enthusiasm about the social and political problems which
were occupying the whole world increased every day, until public meetings
and private intercourse, and the shallow platitudes which formed the staple
eloquence of the orators of the day, proved to me the terrible shallowness of
the whole movement.
Page 402
If only I could rest assured that, while such senseless confusion was the
order of the day, people well versed in these matters would withhold from
any demonstration (which to my great regret I observed in Hermann
Franck, and told him of, openly), then, on the contrary, I should feel myself
compelled, as soon as the opportunity arose, to discuss the purport of such
questions and problems according to my judgment. Needless to say, the
newspapers played an exciting and prominent part on this occasion. Once,
when I went incidentally (as I might go to see a play) to a meeting of the
Vaterlands-Verein, when they were assembled in a public garden, they
chose for the subject of their discussion, ‘Republic or Monarchy?’ I was
astonished to hear and to read with what incredible triviality it was carried
on, and how the sum-total of their explanation was, that, to be sure, a
republic is best, but, at the worst, one could put up with a monarchy if it
were well conducted. As the result of many heated discussions on this point,
I was incited to lay bare my views on the subject in an article which I
published in the DRESDENER ANZEIGER, but which I did not sign. My
special aim was to turn the attention of the few who really took the matter
seriously, from the external form of the government to its intrinsic value.
When I had pursued and consistently discussed the utmost idealistic
conclusions of all that which, to my mind, was necessary and inseparable
from the perfect state and from social order, I inquired whether it would not
be possible to realise all this with a king at the head, and entered so deeply
into the matter as to portray the king in such a fashion, that he seemed even
more anxious than any one else that his state should be organised on
genuinely republican lines, in order that he might attain to the fulfilment of
his own highest aims. I must own, however, that I felt bound to urge this
king to assume a much more familiar attitude towards his people than the
court atmosphere and the almost exclusive society of his nobles would seem
to render possible. Finally, I pointed to the King of Saxony as being
specially chosen by Fate to lead the way in the direction I had indicated,
and to give the example to all the other German princes. Röckel considered
this article a true inspiration from the Angel of Propitiation, but as he feared
that it would not meet with proper recognition and appreciation in the paper,
he urged me to lecture on it publicly at the next meeting of the Vaterlands-
Verein for he attached great importance to my discoursing on the subject
personally. Quite uncertain as to whether I could really persuade myself to
do this, I attended the meeting, and there, owing to the intolerable
order of the day, people well versed in these matters would withhold from
any demonstration (which to my great regret I observed in Hermann
Franck, and told him of, openly), then, on the contrary, I should feel myself
compelled, as soon as the opportunity arose, to discuss the purport of such
questions and problems according to my judgment. Needless to say, the
newspapers played an exciting and prominent part on this occasion. Once,
when I went incidentally (as I might go to see a play) to a meeting of the
Vaterlands-Verein, when they were assembled in a public garden, they
chose for the subject of their discussion, ‘Republic or Monarchy?’ I was
astonished to hear and to read with what incredible triviality it was carried
on, and how the sum-total of their explanation was, that, to be sure, a
republic is best, but, at the worst, one could put up with a monarchy if it
were well conducted. As the result of many heated discussions on this point,
I was incited to lay bare my views on the subject in an article which I
published in the DRESDENER ANZEIGER, but which I did not sign. My
special aim was to turn the attention of the few who really took the matter
seriously, from the external form of the government to its intrinsic value.
When I had pursued and consistently discussed the utmost idealistic
conclusions of all that which, to my mind, was necessary and inseparable
from the perfect state and from social order, I inquired whether it would not
be possible to realise all this with a king at the head, and entered so deeply
into the matter as to portray the king in such a fashion, that he seemed even
more anxious than any one else that his state should be organised on
genuinely republican lines, in order that he might attain to the fulfilment of
his own highest aims. I must own, however, that I felt bound to urge this
king to assume a much more familiar attitude towards his people than the
court atmosphere and the almost exclusive society of his nobles would seem
to render possible. Finally, I pointed to the King of Saxony as being
specially chosen by Fate to lead the way in the direction I had indicated,
and to give the example to all the other German princes. Röckel considered
this article a true inspiration from the Angel of Propitiation, but as he feared
that it would not meet with proper recognition and appreciation in the paper,
he urged me to lecture on it publicly at the next meeting of the Vaterlands-
Verein for he attached great importance to my discoursing on the subject
personally. Quite uncertain as to whether I could really persuade myself to
do this, I attended the meeting, and there, owing to the intolerable
Page 403
balderdash uttered by a certain barrister named Blode and a master-furrier
Klette, whom at that time Dresden venerated as a Demosthenes and a
Cleon, I passionately decided to appear at this extraordinary tribunal with
my paper, and to give a very spirited reading of it to about three thousand
persons.
The success I had was simply appalling. The astounded audience seemed
to remember nothing of the speech of the Orchestral Conductor Royal save
the incidental attack I had made upon the court sycophants. The news of
this incredible event spread like wildfire. The next day I rehearsed Rienzi,
which was to be performed the following evening. I was congratulated on
all sides upon my self-sacrificing audacity. On the day of the performance,
however, I was informed by Eisolt, the attendant of the orchestra, that the
plans had been changed, and he gave me to understand that thereby there
hung a tale. True enough, the terrible sensation I had made became so great,
that the directors feared the most unheard-of demonstrations at any
performance of Rienzi. Then a perfect storm of derision and vituperation
broke loose in the press, and I was besieged on all sides to such an extent
that it was useless to think of self-defence. I had even offended the
Communal Guard of Saxony, and was challenged by the commander to
make a full apology. But the most inexorable enemies I made were the court
officials, especially those holding a minor office, and to this day I still
continue to be persecuted by them. I learned that, as far as it lay in their
power, they incessantly besought the King, and finally the director, to
deprive me at once of my office. On account of this I thought it necessary to
write to the monarch personally, in order to explain to him that my action
was to be regarded more in the light of a thoughtless indiscretion than as a
culpable offence. I sent this letter to Herr von Lüttichau, begging him to
deliver it to the King, and to arrange at the same time a short leave for me,
so that the provoking disturbance should have a chance of dying down
during my absence from Dresden. The striking kindness and goodwill
which Herr von Lüttichau showed me on this occasion made no little
impression upon me, and this I took no pains to conceal from him. As in the
course of time, however, his ill-controlled rage at various things, and
especially at a good deal that he had misunderstood in my pamphlet, broke
loose, I learned that it was not from any humane motives that he had spoken
in such a propitiatory manner to me, but rather by desire of the King
himself. On this point I received most accurate information, and heard that
Klette, whom at that time Dresden venerated as a Demosthenes and a
Cleon, I passionately decided to appear at this extraordinary tribunal with
my paper, and to give a very spirited reading of it to about three thousand
persons.
The success I had was simply appalling. The astounded audience seemed
to remember nothing of the speech of the Orchestral Conductor Royal save
the incidental attack I had made upon the court sycophants. The news of
this incredible event spread like wildfire. The next day I rehearsed Rienzi,
which was to be performed the following evening. I was congratulated on
all sides upon my self-sacrificing audacity. On the day of the performance,
however, I was informed by Eisolt, the attendant of the orchestra, that the
plans had been changed, and he gave me to understand that thereby there
hung a tale. True enough, the terrible sensation I had made became so great,
that the directors feared the most unheard-of demonstrations at any
performance of Rienzi. Then a perfect storm of derision and vituperation
broke loose in the press, and I was besieged on all sides to such an extent
that it was useless to think of self-defence. I had even offended the
Communal Guard of Saxony, and was challenged by the commander to
make a full apology. But the most inexorable enemies I made were the court
officials, especially those holding a minor office, and to this day I still
continue to be persecuted by them. I learned that, as far as it lay in their
power, they incessantly besought the King, and finally the director, to
deprive me at once of my office. On account of this I thought it necessary to
write to the monarch personally, in order to explain to him that my action
was to be regarded more in the light of a thoughtless indiscretion than as a
culpable offence. I sent this letter to Herr von Lüttichau, begging him to
deliver it to the King, and to arrange at the same time a short leave for me,
so that the provoking disturbance should have a chance of dying down
during my absence from Dresden. The striking kindness and goodwill
which Herr von Lüttichau showed me on this occasion made no little
impression upon me, and this I took no pains to conceal from him. As in the
course of time, however, his ill-controlled rage at various things, and
especially at a good deal that he had misunderstood in my pamphlet, broke
loose, I learned that it was not from any humane motives that he had spoken
in such a propitiatory manner to me, but rather by desire of the King
himself. On this point I received most accurate information, and heard that
Page 404
when everybody, and even von Lüttichau himself, were besieging the King
to visit me with punishment, the King had forbidden any further talk on the
subject. After this very encouraging experience, I flattered myself that the
King had understood not only my letter, but also my pamphlet, better than
many others.
In order to change my mind a little, I determined for the present (it was
the beginning of July) to take advantage of the short period of leave granted
to me, by going to Vienna. I travelled by way of Breslau, where I looked up
an old friend of my family, the musical director Mosewius, at whose house I
spent an evening. We had a most lively conversation, but, unfortunately,
were unable to steer clear of the stirring political questions of the day. What
interested me most was his exceptionally large, or even, if I remember
rightly, complete collection of Sebastian Bach’s cantatas in most excellent
copies. Besides this, he related, with a humour quite his own, several
amusing musical anecdotes which were a pleasant memory for many a year.
When Mosewius returned my visit in the course of the summer at Dresden,
I played a part of the first act of Lohengrin on the piano for him, and the
expression of his genuine astonishment at this conception was very
gratifying to me. In later years, however, I found that he had spoken
somewhat scoffingly about me; but I did not stop to reflect as to the truth of
this information, or as to the real character of the man, for little by little I
had had to accustom myself to the most inconceivable things. At Vienna the
first thing I did was to call on Professor Fischhof, as I knew that he had in
his keeping important manuscripts, chiefly by Beethoven, among which the
original of the C minor Sonata, opus 111, I was particularly curious to see.
Through this new friend, whom I found somewhat dry, I made the
acquaintance of Herr Vesque von Puttlingen, who, as the composer of a
most insignificant opera (Joan of Arc), which had been performed in
Dresden, had with cautious good taste adopted only the last two syllables of
Beethoven’s name—Haven. One day we were at his house to dinner, and I
then recognised in him a former confidential official of Prince Metternich,
who now, with his ribbon of black, red, and gold, followed the current of
the age, apparently quite convinced. I made another interesting
acquaintance in the person of Herr von Fonton, the Russian state councillor,
and attache at the Russian Embassy in Vienna. I frequently met this man,
both at Fischhof’s house and on excursions into the surrounding country;
and it was interesting to me for the first time to run up against a man who
to visit me with punishment, the King had forbidden any further talk on the
subject. After this very encouraging experience, I flattered myself that the
King had understood not only my letter, but also my pamphlet, better than
many others.
In order to change my mind a little, I determined for the present (it was
the beginning of July) to take advantage of the short period of leave granted
to me, by going to Vienna. I travelled by way of Breslau, where I looked up
an old friend of my family, the musical director Mosewius, at whose house I
spent an evening. We had a most lively conversation, but, unfortunately,
were unable to steer clear of the stirring political questions of the day. What
interested me most was his exceptionally large, or even, if I remember
rightly, complete collection of Sebastian Bach’s cantatas in most excellent
copies. Besides this, he related, with a humour quite his own, several
amusing musical anecdotes which were a pleasant memory for many a year.
When Mosewius returned my visit in the course of the summer at Dresden,
I played a part of the first act of Lohengrin on the piano for him, and the
expression of his genuine astonishment at this conception was very
gratifying to me. In later years, however, I found that he had spoken
somewhat scoffingly about me; but I did not stop to reflect as to the truth of
this information, or as to the real character of the man, for little by little I
had had to accustom myself to the most inconceivable things. At Vienna the
first thing I did was to call on Professor Fischhof, as I knew that he had in
his keeping important manuscripts, chiefly by Beethoven, among which the
original of the C minor Sonata, opus 111, I was particularly curious to see.
Through this new friend, whom I found somewhat dry, I made the
acquaintance of Herr Vesque von Puttlingen, who, as the composer of a
most insignificant opera (Joan of Arc), which had been performed in
Dresden, had with cautious good taste adopted only the last two syllables of
Beethoven’s name—Haven. One day we were at his house to dinner, and I
then recognised in him a former confidential official of Prince Metternich,
who now, with his ribbon of black, red, and gold, followed the current of
the age, apparently quite convinced. I made another interesting
acquaintance in the person of Herr von Fonton, the Russian state councillor,
and attache at the Russian Embassy in Vienna. I frequently met this man,
both at Fischhof’s house and on excursions into the surrounding country;
and it was interesting to me for the first time to run up against a man who
Page 405
could so strongly profess his faith in the pessimistic standpoint, that a
consistent despotism guarantees the only order of things which can be
tolerated. Not without interest, and certainly not without intelligence—for
he boasted of having been educated at the most enlightened schools in
Switzerland—he listened to my enthusiastic narration of the art ideal which
I had in my mind, and which was destined to exercise a great and decided
influence upon the human race. As he had to allow that the realisation of
this ideal could not be effected through the strength of despotism, and as he
was unable to foresee any rewards for my exertions, by the time we came to
the champagne he thawed to such a degree of affable good-nature as to wish
me every success. I learned later on that this man, of whose talent and
energetic character I had at the time no small opinion, was last heard of as
being in great distress.
Now, as I never undertook anything whatever without some serious
object in view, I had made up my mind to avail myself of this visit to
Vienna, in order to try in some practical manner to promote my ideas for the
reform of the theatre. Vienna seemed to me specially suitable for this
purpose, as at that, time it had five theatres, all totally different in character,
which were dragging on a miserable existence. I quickly worked out a plan,
according to which these various theatres might be formed into a sort of co-
operative organisation, and placed under one administration composed not
only of active members, but also of all those having any literary connection
with the theatre. With a view to submitting my plan to them, I then made
inquiries about persons with such capacities as seemed most likely to
answer my requirements. Besides Herr Friedrich Uhl, whom I had got to
know at the very beginning through Fischer, and who did me very good
service, I was told of a Herr Franck (the same, I presume, who later on
published a big epic work called Tannhäuser), and a Dr. Pacher, an agent of
Meyerbeer’s, and a pettifogger of whose acquaintance later on I was to have
no reason to be proud. The most sympathetic, and certainly the most
important, of those chosen by me for the conference meeting at Fischhof’s
house, was undoubtedly Dr. Becher, a passionate and exceedingly cultivated
man. He was the only one present who seriously followed the reading of my
plan, although, of course, he by no means agreed with everything. I
observed in him a certain wildness and vehemence, the impression of which
returned to me very vividly some months later, when I heard of his being
shot as a rebel who had participated in the October Insurrection at Vienna.
consistent despotism guarantees the only order of things which can be
tolerated. Not without interest, and certainly not without intelligence—for
he boasted of having been educated at the most enlightened schools in
Switzerland—he listened to my enthusiastic narration of the art ideal which
I had in my mind, and which was destined to exercise a great and decided
influence upon the human race. As he had to allow that the realisation of
this ideal could not be effected through the strength of despotism, and as he
was unable to foresee any rewards for my exertions, by the time we came to
the champagne he thawed to such a degree of affable good-nature as to wish
me every success. I learned later on that this man, of whose talent and
energetic character I had at the time no small opinion, was last heard of as
being in great distress.
Now, as I never undertook anything whatever without some serious
object in view, I had made up my mind to avail myself of this visit to
Vienna, in order to try in some practical manner to promote my ideas for the
reform of the theatre. Vienna seemed to me specially suitable for this
purpose, as at that, time it had five theatres, all totally different in character,
which were dragging on a miserable existence. I quickly worked out a plan,
according to which these various theatres might be formed into a sort of co-
operative organisation, and placed under one administration composed not
only of active members, but also of all those having any literary connection
with the theatre. With a view to submitting my plan to them, I then made
inquiries about persons with such capacities as seemed most likely to
answer my requirements. Besides Herr Friedrich Uhl, whom I had got to
know at the very beginning through Fischer, and who did me very good
service, I was told of a Herr Franck (the same, I presume, who later on
published a big epic work called Tannhäuser), and a Dr. Pacher, an agent of
Meyerbeer’s, and a pettifogger of whose acquaintance later on I was to have
no reason to be proud. The most sympathetic, and certainly the most
important, of those chosen by me for the conference meeting at Fischhof’s
house, was undoubtedly Dr. Becher, a passionate and exceedingly cultivated
man. He was the only one present who seriously followed the reading of my
plan, although, of course, he by no means agreed with everything. I
observed in him a certain wildness and vehemence, the impression of which
returned to me very vividly some months later, when I heard of his being
shot as a rebel who had participated in the October Insurrection at Vienna.
Page 406
For the present, then, I had to satisfy myself with having read the plan of
my theatre reform to a few attentive listeners. All seemed to be convinced
that the time was not opportune for putting forward such peaceable schemes
of reform. On the other hand, Uhl thought it right to give me an idea of
what was at present all the rage in Vienna, by taking me one evening to a
political club of the most advanced tendencies. There I heard a speech by
Herr Sigismund Englander, who shortly afterwards attracted much attention
in the political monthly papers; the unblushing audacity with which he and
others expressed themselves that evening with regard to the most dreaded
persons in public power astounded me almost as much as the poverty of the
political views expressed on that occasion. By way of contrast I received a
very nice impression of Herr Grillparzer, the poet, whose name was like a
fable to me, associated as it was, from my earliest days, with his Ahnfrau. I
approached him also with respect to the matter of my theatre reform. He
seemed quite disposed to listen in a friendly manner to what I had to say to
him; he did not, however, attempt to conceal his surprise at my direct
appeals and the personal demands I made of him. He was the first
playwright I had ever seen in an official uniform.
After I had paid an unsuccessful visit to Herr Bauernfeld, relative to the
same business, I concluded that Vienna was of no more use for the present,
and gave myself up to the exceptionally stimulating impressions produced
by the public life of the motley crowd, which of late had undergone such
marked changes. If the student band, which was always represented in great
numbers in the streets, had already amused me with the extraordinary
constancy with which its members sported the German colours, I was very
highly diverted by the effect produced when at the theatres I saw even the
ices served by attendants in the black, red, and gold of Austria. At the Karl
Theatre, in the Leopold quarter of the town, I saw a new farce, by Nestroy,
which actually introduced the character of Prince Metternich, and in which
this statesman, on being asked whether he had poisoned the Duke of
Reichstadt, had to make his escape behind the wings as an unmasked sinner.
On the whole, the appearance of this imperial city—usually so fond of
pleasure—impressed one with a feeling of youthful and powerful
confidence. And this impression was revived in me when I heard of the
energetic participation of the youthful members of the population, during
those fateful October days, in the defence of Vienna against the troops of
Prince Windischgratz.
my theatre reform to a few attentive listeners. All seemed to be convinced
that the time was not opportune for putting forward such peaceable schemes
of reform. On the other hand, Uhl thought it right to give me an idea of
what was at present all the rage in Vienna, by taking me one evening to a
political club of the most advanced tendencies. There I heard a speech by
Herr Sigismund Englander, who shortly afterwards attracted much attention
in the political monthly papers; the unblushing audacity with which he and
others expressed themselves that evening with regard to the most dreaded
persons in public power astounded me almost as much as the poverty of the
political views expressed on that occasion. By way of contrast I received a
very nice impression of Herr Grillparzer, the poet, whose name was like a
fable to me, associated as it was, from my earliest days, with his Ahnfrau. I
approached him also with respect to the matter of my theatre reform. He
seemed quite disposed to listen in a friendly manner to what I had to say to
him; he did not, however, attempt to conceal his surprise at my direct
appeals and the personal demands I made of him. He was the first
playwright I had ever seen in an official uniform.
After I had paid an unsuccessful visit to Herr Bauernfeld, relative to the
same business, I concluded that Vienna was of no more use for the present,
and gave myself up to the exceptionally stimulating impressions produced
by the public life of the motley crowd, which of late had undergone such
marked changes. If the student band, which was always represented in great
numbers in the streets, had already amused me with the extraordinary
constancy with which its members sported the German colours, I was very
highly diverted by the effect produced when at the theatres I saw even the
ices served by attendants in the black, red, and gold of Austria. At the Karl
Theatre, in the Leopold quarter of the town, I saw a new farce, by Nestroy,
which actually introduced the character of Prince Metternich, and in which
this statesman, on being asked whether he had poisoned the Duke of
Reichstadt, had to make his escape behind the wings as an unmasked sinner.
On the whole, the appearance of this imperial city—usually so fond of
pleasure—impressed one with a feeling of youthful and powerful
confidence. And this impression was revived in me when I heard of the
energetic participation of the youthful members of the population, during
those fateful October days, in the defence of Vienna against the troops of
Prince Windischgratz.
Page 407
On the homeward journey I touched at Prague, where I found my old
friend Kittl (who had grown very much more corpulent) still in the most
terrible fright about the riotous events which had taken place there. He
seemed to be of opinion that the revolt of the Tschech party against the
Austrian Government was directed at him personally, and he thought fit to
reproach himself with the terrible agitation of the time, which he believed
he had specially inflamed by his composition of my operatic text of Die
Franzosen vor Nizza, out of which a kind of revolutionary air seemed to
have become very popular. To my great pleasure, on my homeward journey
I had the company of Hänel the sculptor, whom I met on the steamer. There
travelled with us also a Count Albert Nostitz, with whom he had just settled
up his business concerning the statue of the Emperor Charles IV., and he
was in the gayest mood, as the extremely insecure state of Austrian paper
money had led to his being paid at a great profit to himself, in silver coin in
accordance with his agreement. I was very pleased to find that, thanks to
this circumstance, he was in such a confident mood, and so free from
prejudice, that on, arriving at Dresden he accompanied me the whole way—
a very long distance—from the landing-stage at which we had left the
steamer to my house, in an open carriage; and this despite the fact that he
very well knew that, only a few weeks before, I had caused a really terrible
stir in this very city.
As far as the public were concerned, the storm seemed quite to have died
down, and I was able to resume my usual occupations and mode of life
without any further trouble. I am sorry to say, however, that my old worries
and anxieties started afresh; I stood in great need of money, and had not the
vaguest notion whither to go in search of it. I then examined very
thoroughly the answer I had received during the preceding winter to my
petition for a higher salary. I had left it unread, as the modifications made in
it had already disgusted me. If I had till now believed that it was Herr von
Lüttichau who had brought about the increase of salary I had demanded, in
the shape of a supplement which I was to receive annually—in itself a
humiliating thing—I now saw to my horror that all the time there had been
no mention save of one single supplement, and that there was nothing to
show that this should be repeated annually. On learning this, I saw that I
should now be at the hopeless disadvantage of coming too late with a
remonstrance if I should attempt to make one; so there was nothing left for
me but to submit to an insult which, under the circumstances, was quite
friend Kittl (who had grown very much more corpulent) still in the most
terrible fright about the riotous events which had taken place there. He
seemed to be of opinion that the revolt of the Tschech party against the
Austrian Government was directed at him personally, and he thought fit to
reproach himself with the terrible agitation of the time, which he believed
he had specially inflamed by his composition of my operatic text of Die
Franzosen vor Nizza, out of which a kind of revolutionary air seemed to
have become very popular. To my great pleasure, on my homeward journey
I had the company of Hänel the sculptor, whom I met on the steamer. There
travelled with us also a Count Albert Nostitz, with whom he had just settled
up his business concerning the statue of the Emperor Charles IV., and he
was in the gayest mood, as the extremely insecure state of Austrian paper
money had led to his being paid at a great profit to himself, in silver coin in
accordance with his agreement. I was very pleased to find that, thanks to
this circumstance, he was in such a confident mood, and so free from
prejudice, that on, arriving at Dresden he accompanied me the whole way—
a very long distance—from the landing-stage at which we had left the
steamer to my house, in an open carriage; and this despite the fact that he
very well knew that, only a few weeks before, I had caused a really terrible
stir in this very city.
As far as the public were concerned, the storm seemed quite to have died
down, and I was able to resume my usual occupations and mode of life
without any further trouble. I am sorry to say, however, that my old worries
and anxieties started afresh; I stood in great need of money, and had not the
vaguest notion whither to go in search of it. I then examined very
thoroughly the answer I had received during the preceding winter to my
petition for a higher salary. I had left it unread, as the modifications made in
it had already disgusted me. If I had till now believed that it was Herr von
Lüttichau who had brought about the increase of salary I had demanded, in
the shape of a supplement which I was to receive annually—in itself a
humiliating thing—I now saw to my horror that all the time there had been
no mention save of one single supplement, and that there was nothing to
show that this should be repeated annually. On learning this, I saw that I
should now be at the hopeless disadvantage of coming too late with a
remonstrance if I should attempt to make one; so there was nothing left for
me but to submit to an insult which, under the circumstances, was quite
Page 408
unprecedented. My feelings towards Herr von Lüttichau, which shortly
before had been rather warm owing to his supposed kind attitude towards
me during the last disturbance, now underwent a serious change, and I soon
had a new reason (actually connected with the above-mentioned affair) for
altering my favourable opinion of him, and for turning finally against him
for good and all. He had informed me that the members of the Imperial
Orchestra had sent him a deputation demanding my instant dismissal, as
they thought that it affected their honour to be any longer under a conductor
who had compromised himself politically to the extent which I had. He also
informed me that he had not only reprimanded them very severely, but that
he had also been at great pains to pacify them concerning me. All this,
which Lüttichau had put in a highly favourable light, had latterly made me
feel very friendly towards him. Then, however, as the result of inquiries into
the matter, I heard accidentally through members of the orchestra that the
facts of the case were almost exactly the reverse. What had happened was
this, that the members of the Imperial Orchestra had been approached on all
sides by the officials of the court, and had been not only earnestly requested
to do what Lüttichau had declared they had done of their own accord, but
also threatened with the displeasure of the King, and of incurring the
strongest suspicion if they refused to comply. In order to protect themselves
against this intrigue, and to avoid all evil consequences should they not take
the required step, the musicians had turned to their principal, and had sent
him a deputation, through which they declared that, as a corporation of
artists, they did not in the least feel called upon to mix themselves up in a
matter that did not concern them. Thus the halo with which my former
attachment to Herr von Lüttichau had surrounded him at last disappeared
for good and all, and it was chiefly my shame at having been so very much
upset by his false conduct that now inspired me for ever with such bitter
feelings for this man. What determined this feeling even more than the
insults I had suffered, was the recognition of the fact that I was now utterly
incapable of ever being able to enlist his influence in the cause of theatrical
reform, which was so dear to me. It was natural that I should learn to attach
ever less and less importance to the mere retention of the post of orchestral
conductor on so extraordinarily inadequate and reduced a salary; and in
keeping to this office, I merely bowed to what was an inevitable though
purely accidental circumstance of a wretched fate. I did nothing to make the
before had been rather warm owing to his supposed kind attitude towards
me during the last disturbance, now underwent a serious change, and I soon
had a new reason (actually connected with the above-mentioned affair) for
altering my favourable opinion of him, and for turning finally against him
for good and all. He had informed me that the members of the Imperial
Orchestra had sent him a deputation demanding my instant dismissal, as
they thought that it affected their honour to be any longer under a conductor
who had compromised himself politically to the extent which I had. He also
informed me that he had not only reprimanded them very severely, but that
he had also been at great pains to pacify them concerning me. All this,
which Lüttichau had put in a highly favourable light, had latterly made me
feel very friendly towards him. Then, however, as the result of inquiries into
the matter, I heard accidentally through members of the orchestra that the
facts of the case were almost exactly the reverse. What had happened was
this, that the members of the Imperial Orchestra had been approached on all
sides by the officials of the court, and had been not only earnestly requested
to do what Lüttichau had declared they had done of their own accord, but
also threatened with the displeasure of the King, and of incurring the
strongest suspicion if they refused to comply. In order to protect themselves
against this intrigue, and to avoid all evil consequences should they not take
the required step, the musicians had turned to their principal, and had sent
him a deputation, through which they declared that, as a corporation of
artists, they did not in the least feel called upon to mix themselves up in a
matter that did not concern them. Thus the halo with which my former
attachment to Herr von Lüttichau had surrounded him at last disappeared
for good and all, and it was chiefly my shame at having been so very much
upset by his false conduct that now inspired me for ever with such bitter
feelings for this man. What determined this feeling even more than the
insults I had suffered, was the recognition of the fact that I was now utterly
incapable of ever being able to enlist his influence in the cause of theatrical
reform, which was so dear to me. It was natural that I should learn to attach
ever less and less importance to the mere retention of the post of orchestral
conductor on so extraordinarily inadequate and reduced a salary; and in
keeping to this office, I merely bowed to what was an inevitable though
purely accidental circumstance of a wretched fate. I did nothing to make the
Page 409
post more intolerable, but, at the same time, I moved not a finger to ensure
its permanence.
The very next thing I must do was to attempt to establish my hopes of a
larger income, so sadly doomed hitherto, upon a very much sounder basis.
In this respect it occurred to me that I might consult my friend Liszt, and
beg him to suggest a remedy for my grievous position. And lo and behold,
shortly after those fateful March days, and not long before the completion
of my Lohengrin score, to my very great delight and astonishment, the very
man I wanted walked into my room. He had come from Vienna, where he
had lived through the ‘Barricade Days,’ and he was going on to Weimar,
where he intended to settle permanently. We spent an evening together at
Schumann’s, had a little music, and finally began a discussion on
Mendelssohn and Meyerbeer, in which Liszt and Schumann differed so
fundamentally that the latter, completely losing his temper, retired in a fury
to his bedroom for quite a long time. This incident did indeed place us in a
somewhat awkward position towards our host, but it furnished us with a
most amusing topic of conversation on the way home, I have seldom seen
Liszt so extravagantly cheerful as on that night, when, in spite of the cold
and the fact that he was clad only in ordinary evening-dress, he
accompanied first the music director Schubert, and then myself, to our
respective homes. Subsequently I took advantage of a few days’ holiday in
August to make an excursion to Weimar, where I found Liszt permanently
installed and, as is well known, enjoying a life of most intimate intercourse
with the Grand Duke. Even though he was unable to help me in my affairs,
except by giving me a recommendation which finally proved useless, his
reception of me on this short visit was so hearty and so exceedingly
stimulating, that it left me profoundly cheered and encouraged. On
returning to Dresden I tried as far as possible to curtail my expenses and to
live within my means; and, as every means of assistance failed me, I
resorted to the expedient of sending out a circular letter addressed jointly to
my remaining creditors, all of whom were really friends; and in this I told
them frankly of my situation, and enjoined them to relinquish their demands
for an indefinite time, till my affairs took a turn for the better, as without
this I should certainly never be in a position to satisfy them. By this means
they would, at all events, be in a position to oppose my general manager,
whom I had every reason to suspect of evil designs, and who would have
been only too glad to seize any signs of hostility towards me, on the part of
its permanence.
The very next thing I must do was to attempt to establish my hopes of a
larger income, so sadly doomed hitherto, upon a very much sounder basis.
In this respect it occurred to me that I might consult my friend Liszt, and
beg him to suggest a remedy for my grievous position. And lo and behold,
shortly after those fateful March days, and not long before the completion
of my Lohengrin score, to my very great delight and astonishment, the very
man I wanted walked into my room. He had come from Vienna, where he
had lived through the ‘Barricade Days,’ and he was going on to Weimar,
where he intended to settle permanently. We spent an evening together at
Schumann’s, had a little music, and finally began a discussion on
Mendelssohn and Meyerbeer, in which Liszt and Schumann differed so
fundamentally that the latter, completely losing his temper, retired in a fury
to his bedroom for quite a long time. This incident did indeed place us in a
somewhat awkward position towards our host, but it furnished us with a
most amusing topic of conversation on the way home, I have seldom seen
Liszt so extravagantly cheerful as on that night, when, in spite of the cold
and the fact that he was clad only in ordinary evening-dress, he
accompanied first the music director Schubert, and then myself, to our
respective homes. Subsequently I took advantage of a few days’ holiday in
August to make an excursion to Weimar, where I found Liszt permanently
installed and, as is well known, enjoying a life of most intimate intercourse
with the Grand Duke. Even though he was unable to help me in my affairs,
except by giving me a recommendation which finally proved useless, his
reception of me on this short visit was so hearty and so exceedingly
stimulating, that it left me profoundly cheered and encouraged. On
returning to Dresden I tried as far as possible to curtail my expenses and to
live within my means; and, as every means of assistance failed me, I
resorted to the expedient of sending out a circular letter addressed jointly to
my remaining creditors, all of whom were really friends; and in this I told
them frankly of my situation, and enjoined them to relinquish their demands
for an indefinite time, till my affairs took a turn for the better, as without
this I should certainly never be in a position to satisfy them. By this means
they would, at all events, be in a position to oppose my general manager,
whom I had every reason to suspect of evil designs, and who would have
been only too glad to seize any signs of hostility towards me, on the part of
Page 410
my creditors, as a pretext for taking the worst steps against me. The
assurance I required was given me unhesitatingly; my friend Pusinelli, and
Frau Klepperbein (an old friend of my mother’s), even going so far as to
declare that they were prepared to give up all claim to the money they had
lent me. Thus, in some measure reassured, and with my position relative to
Lüttichau so far improved that I could consult my own wishes as to whether
and when I should give up my post entirely, I now continued to fulfil my
duties as a conductor as patiently and conscientiously as I was able, while
with great zeal I also resumed my studies, which were carrying me ever
further and further afield.
Thus settled, I now began to watch the wonderful developments in the
fate of my friend Röckel. As every day brought fresh rumours of threatened
reactionary coups d’etat and similar violent outbreaks, which Röckel
thought it right to prevent, he drew up an appeal to the soldiers of the army
of Saxony, in which he explained every detail of the cause for which he
stood, and which he then had printed and distributed broadcast. This was
too flagrant a misdeed for the public prosecutors: he was therefore
immediately placed under arrest, and had to remain three days in gaol while
an action for high treason was lodged against him. He was only released
when the solicitor Minkwitz stood bail for the requisite three thousand
marks (equal to L150). This return home to his anxious wife and children
was celebrated by a little public festival, which the committee of the
Vaterlands-Verein had arranged in his honour, and the liberated man was
greeted as the champion of the people’s cause. On the other hand, however,
the general management of the court theatre, who had before suspended
him temporarily, now gave him his final dismissal. Röckel let a full beard
grow, and began the publication of a popular journal called the Volksblatt,
of which he was sole editor. He must have counted on its success to
compensate him for the loss of his salary as musical director, for he at once
hired an office in the Brudergasse for his undertaking. This paper succeeded
in attracting the attention of a great many people to its editor, and showed
up his talents in quite a new light, he never got involved in his style or
indulged in any elaboration of words, but confined himself to matters of
immediate importance and general interest; it was only after having
discussed them in a calm and sober fashion, that he led up from them to
further deductions of still greater interest connected with them. The
individual articles were short, and never contained anything superfluous, in
assurance I required was given me unhesitatingly; my friend Pusinelli, and
Frau Klepperbein (an old friend of my mother’s), even going so far as to
declare that they were prepared to give up all claim to the money they had
lent me. Thus, in some measure reassured, and with my position relative to
Lüttichau so far improved that I could consult my own wishes as to whether
and when I should give up my post entirely, I now continued to fulfil my
duties as a conductor as patiently and conscientiously as I was able, while
with great zeal I also resumed my studies, which were carrying me ever
further and further afield.
Thus settled, I now began to watch the wonderful developments in the
fate of my friend Röckel. As every day brought fresh rumours of threatened
reactionary coups d’etat and similar violent outbreaks, which Röckel
thought it right to prevent, he drew up an appeal to the soldiers of the army
of Saxony, in which he explained every detail of the cause for which he
stood, and which he then had printed and distributed broadcast. This was
too flagrant a misdeed for the public prosecutors: he was therefore
immediately placed under arrest, and had to remain three days in gaol while
an action for high treason was lodged against him. He was only released
when the solicitor Minkwitz stood bail for the requisite three thousand
marks (equal to L150). This return home to his anxious wife and children
was celebrated by a little public festival, which the committee of the
Vaterlands-Verein had arranged in his honour, and the liberated man was
greeted as the champion of the people’s cause. On the other hand, however,
the general management of the court theatre, who had before suspended
him temporarily, now gave him his final dismissal. Röckel let a full beard
grow, and began the publication of a popular journal called the Volksblatt,
of which he was sole editor. He must have counted on its success to
compensate him for the loss of his salary as musical director, for he at once
hired an office in the Brudergasse for his undertaking. This paper succeeded
in attracting the attention of a great many people to its editor, and showed
up his talents in quite a new light, he never got involved in his style or
indulged in any elaboration of words, but confined himself to matters of
immediate importance and general interest; it was only after having
discussed them in a calm and sober fashion, that he led up from them to
further deductions of still greater interest connected with them. The
individual articles were short, and never contained anything superfluous, in
Page 411
addition to which they were so clearly written, that they made an instructive
and convincing appeal to the most uneducated mind. By always going to the
root of things, instead of indulging in circumlocutions which, in politics,
have caused such great confusion in the minds of the uneducated masses, he
soon had a large circle of readers, both among cultivated and uncultivated
people. The only drawback was that the price of the little weekly paper was
too small to yield him a corresponding profit. Moreover, it was necessary to
warn him that if the reactionary party should ever come into power again, it
could never possibly forgive him for this newspaper. His younger brother,
Edward, who was paying a visit at the time in Dresden, declared himself
willing to accept a post as piano-teacher in England, which, though most
uncongenial to him, would be lucrative and place him in a position to help
Röckel’s family, if, as seemed probable, he met his reward in prison or on
the gallows. Owing to his connection with various societies, his time was so
much taken up that my intercourse with him was limited to walks, which
became more and more rare. On these occasions I often got lost in the most
wildly speculative and profound discussions, while this wonderfully
exciteable man always remained calmly reflective and clear-headed. First
and foremost, he had planned a drastic social reform of the middle classes
—as at present constituted—by aiming at a complete alteration of the basis
of their condition. He constructed a totally new moral order of things,
founded on the teaching of Proudhon and other socialists regarding the
annihilation of the power of capital, by immediately productive labour,
dispensing with the middleman. Little by little he converted me, by most
seductive arguments, to his own views, to such an extent that I began to
rebuild my hopes for the realisation of my ideal in art upon them. Thus
there were two questions which concerned me very nearly: he wished to
abolish matrimony, in the usual acceptation of the word, altogether. I
thereupon asked him what he thought the result would be of promiscuous
intercourse with women of a doubtful character. With amiable indignation
he gave me to understand that we could have no idea about the purity of
morals in general, and of the relations of the sexes in particular, so long as
we were unable to free people completely from the yoke of the trades,
guilds, and similar coercive institutions. He asked me to consider what the
only motive would be which would induce a woman to surrender herself to
a man, when not only the considerations of money, fortune, position, and
family prejudices, but also the various influences necessarily arising from
and convincing appeal to the most uneducated mind. By always going to the
root of things, instead of indulging in circumlocutions which, in politics,
have caused such great confusion in the minds of the uneducated masses, he
soon had a large circle of readers, both among cultivated and uncultivated
people. The only drawback was that the price of the little weekly paper was
too small to yield him a corresponding profit. Moreover, it was necessary to
warn him that if the reactionary party should ever come into power again, it
could never possibly forgive him for this newspaper. His younger brother,
Edward, who was paying a visit at the time in Dresden, declared himself
willing to accept a post as piano-teacher in England, which, though most
uncongenial to him, would be lucrative and place him in a position to help
Röckel’s family, if, as seemed probable, he met his reward in prison or on
the gallows. Owing to his connection with various societies, his time was so
much taken up that my intercourse with him was limited to walks, which
became more and more rare. On these occasions I often got lost in the most
wildly speculative and profound discussions, while this wonderfully
exciteable man always remained calmly reflective and clear-headed. First
and foremost, he had planned a drastic social reform of the middle classes
—as at present constituted—by aiming at a complete alteration of the basis
of their condition. He constructed a totally new moral order of things,
founded on the teaching of Proudhon and other socialists regarding the
annihilation of the power of capital, by immediately productive labour,
dispensing with the middleman. Little by little he converted me, by most
seductive arguments, to his own views, to such an extent that I began to
rebuild my hopes for the realisation of my ideal in art upon them. Thus
there were two questions which concerned me very nearly: he wished to
abolish matrimony, in the usual acceptation of the word, altogether. I
thereupon asked him what he thought the result would be of promiscuous
intercourse with women of a doubtful character. With amiable indignation
he gave me to understand that we could have no idea about the purity of
morals in general, and of the relations of the sexes in particular, so long as
we were unable to free people completely from the yoke of the trades,
guilds, and similar coercive institutions. He asked me to consider what the
only motive would be which would induce a woman to surrender herself to
a man, when not only the considerations of money, fortune, position, and
family prejudices, but also the various influences necessarily arising from
Page 412
these, had disappeared. When I, in my turn, asked him whence he would
obtain persons of great intellect and of artistic ability, if everybody were to
be merged in the working classes, he met my objection by replying, that
owing to the very fact that everybody would participate in the necessary
labour according to his strength and capacity, work would cease to be a
burden, and would become simply an occupation which would finally
assume an entirely artistic character. He demonstrated this on the principle
that, as had already been proved, a field, worked laboriously by a single
peasant, was infinitely less productive than when cultivated by several
persons in a scientific way. These and similar suggestions, which Röckel
communicated to me with a really delightful enthusiasm, led me to further
reflections, and gave birth to new plans upon which, to my mind, a possible
organisation of the human race, which would correspond to my highest
ideals in art, could alone be based. In reference to this, I immediately turned
my thoughts to what was close at hand, and directed my attention to the
theatre. The motive for this came not only from my own feelings, but also
from external circumstances. In accordance with the latest democratic
suffrage laws, a general election seemed imminent in Saxony; the election
of extreme radicals, which had now taken place nearly everywhere else,
showed us that if the movement lasted, there would be the most
extraordinary changes even in the administration of the revenue. Apparently
a general resolution had been passed to subject the Civil List to a strict
revision; all that was deemed superfluous in the royal household was to be
done away with; the theatre, as an unnecessary place of entertainment for a
depraved portion of the public, was threatened with the withdrawal of the
subsidy granted it from the Civil List. I now resolved, in view of the
importance which I attached to the theatre, to suggest to the ministers that
they should inform the members of parliament, that if the theatre in its
present condition were not worth any sacrifice from the state, it would sink
to still more doubtful tendencies—and might even become dangerous to
public morals—if deprived of that state control which had for its aim the
ideal, and, at the same time, felt itself called upon to place culture and
education under its beneficial protection. It was of the highest importance to
me to secure an organisation of the theatre, which would make the carrying
out its loftiest ideals not only a possibility but also a certainty. Accordingly
I drew up a project by which the same sum as that which was allotted from
the Civil List for the support of a court theatre should be employed for the
obtain persons of great intellect and of artistic ability, if everybody were to
be merged in the working classes, he met my objection by replying, that
owing to the very fact that everybody would participate in the necessary
labour according to his strength and capacity, work would cease to be a
burden, and would become simply an occupation which would finally
assume an entirely artistic character. He demonstrated this on the principle
that, as had already been proved, a field, worked laboriously by a single
peasant, was infinitely less productive than when cultivated by several
persons in a scientific way. These and similar suggestions, which Röckel
communicated to me with a really delightful enthusiasm, led me to further
reflections, and gave birth to new plans upon which, to my mind, a possible
organisation of the human race, which would correspond to my highest
ideals in art, could alone be based. In reference to this, I immediately turned
my thoughts to what was close at hand, and directed my attention to the
theatre. The motive for this came not only from my own feelings, but also
from external circumstances. In accordance with the latest democratic
suffrage laws, a general election seemed imminent in Saxony; the election
of extreme radicals, which had now taken place nearly everywhere else,
showed us that if the movement lasted, there would be the most
extraordinary changes even in the administration of the revenue. Apparently
a general resolution had been passed to subject the Civil List to a strict
revision; all that was deemed superfluous in the royal household was to be
done away with; the theatre, as an unnecessary place of entertainment for a
depraved portion of the public, was threatened with the withdrawal of the
subsidy granted it from the Civil List. I now resolved, in view of the
importance which I attached to the theatre, to suggest to the ministers that
they should inform the members of parliament, that if the theatre in its
present condition were not worth any sacrifice from the state, it would sink
to still more doubtful tendencies—and might even become dangerous to
public morals—if deprived of that state control which had for its aim the
ideal, and, at the same time, felt itself called upon to place culture and
education under its beneficial protection. It was of the highest importance to
me to secure an organisation of the theatre, which would make the carrying
out its loftiest ideals not only a possibility but also a certainty. Accordingly
I drew up a project by which the same sum as that which was allotted from
the Civil List for the support of a court theatre should be employed for the
Page 413
foundation and upkeep of a national theatre for the kingdom of Saxony. In
showing the practical nature of the well-planned particulars of my scheme, I
defined them with such great precision, that I felt assured my work would
serve as a useful guide to the ministers as to how they should put this matter
before parliament. The point now was to have a personal interview with one
of the ministers, and it occurred to me that the best man to apply to in the
matter would be Herr von der Pfordten, the Minister of Education. Although
he already enjoyed the reputation of being a turncoat in politics, and was
said to be struggling to efface the origin of his political promotion, which
had taken place at a time of great agitation, the mere fact of his having
formerly been a professor was sufficient to make me suppose that he was a
man with whom I could discuss the question that I had so much at heart. I
learned, however, that the real art institutions of the kingdom, such, for
instance, as the Academy of Fine Arts, to whose number I so ardently
desired to see the theatre added, belonged to the department of the Minister
of the Interior. To this man—the worthy though not highly cultivated or
artistic Herr Oberlander—I submitted my plans, not, however, without
having first made myself known to Herr von der Pfordten, in order, for the
reasons above stated, to command my project to him. This man, who
apparently was very busy, received me in a polite and reassuring manner;
but his whole bearing, indeed the very expression of his face, seemed to
destroy all hopes I might ever have cherished of finding in him that
understanding which I had expected. The minister Oberlander, on the other
hand, earned my confidence by the straightforward earnestness with which
he promised a thorough inquiry into the matter. Unfortunately, however, at
the same time, he informed me with the most simple frankness, that he
could entertain but very little hope of getting the King’s authorisation for
any unusual treatment of a question hitherto given over to routine. It must
be understood that the relations of the King to his ministers were both
strained and unconfidential, and that this was more especially so in the case
of Oberlander, who never approached the monarch on any other business
than that which the strictest discharge of his current duties rendered
indispensable. He therefore thought it would be better if my plan could be
brought forward, in the first place, by the Chamber of Deputies. As, in the
event of the new Civil List being discussed, I was particularly anxious to
avoid the question of the continuation of the court theatre being treated in
the ignorant and shortsighted radical fashion, which was to be feared above
showing the practical nature of the well-planned particulars of my scheme, I
defined them with such great precision, that I felt assured my work would
serve as a useful guide to the ministers as to how they should put this matter
before parliament. The point now was to have a personal interview with one
of the ministers, and it occurred to me that the best man to apply to in the
matter would be Herr von der Pfordten, the Minister of Education. Although
he already enjoyed the reputation of being a turncoat in politics, and was
said to be struggling to efface the origin of his political promotion, which
had taken place at a time of great agitation, the mere fact of his having
formerly been a professor was sufficient to make me suppose that he was a
man with whom I could discuss the question that I had so much at heart. I
learned, however, that the real art institutions of the kingdom, such, for
instance, as the Academy of Fine Arts, to whose number I so ardently
desired to see the theatre added, belonged to the department of the Minister
of the Interior. To this man—the worthy though not highly cultivated or
artistic Herr Oberlander—I submitted my plans, not, however, without
having first made myself known to Herr von der Pfordten, in order, for the
reasons above stated, to command my project to him. This man, who
apparently was very busy, received me in a polite and reassuring manner;
but his whole bearing, indeed the very expression of his face, seemed to
destroy all hopes I might ever have cherished of finding in him that
understanding which I had expected. The minister Oberlander, on the other
hand, earned my confidence by the straightforward earnestness with which
he promised a thorough inquiry into the matter. Unfortunately, however, at
the same time, he informed me with the most simple frankness, that he
could entertain but very little hope of getting the King’s authorisation for
any unusual treatment of a question hitherto given over to routine. It must
be understood that the relations of the King to his ministers were both
strained and unconfidential, and that this was more especially so in the case
of Oberlander, who never approached the monarch on any other business
than that which the strictest discharge of his current duties rendered
indispensable. He therefore thought it would be better if my plan could be
brought forward, in the first place, by the Chamber of Deputies. As, in the
event of the new Civil List being discussed, I was particularly anxious to
avoid the question of the continuation of the court theatre being treated in
the ignorant and shortsighted radical fashion, which was to be feared above
Page 414
all, I did not despair of making the acquaintance of some of the most
influential among the new members of parliament. In this wise I found
myself suddenly plunged into quite a new and strange world, and became
acquainted with persons and opinions, the very existence of which until
then I had not even suspected. I found it somewhat trying always to be
obliged to meet these gentlemen at their beer and shrouded in the dense
clouds of their tobacco smoke, and to have to discuss with them matters
which, though very dear to me, must have seemed a little fantastic to their
mind. After a certain Herr von Trutschler, a very handsome, energetic man,
whose seriousness was almost gloomy, had listened to me calmly for some
time, and had told me that he no longer knew anything about the state, but
only about society, and that the latter would know, without either his or my
aid, how it should act in regard to art and to the theatre, I was filled with
such extraordinary feelings, half mingled with shame, that there and then I
gave up, not only all my exertions, but all my hopes as well. The only
reminder I ever had of the whole affair came some while, after when, on
meeting Herr von Lüttichau, I quickly gathered from his attitude to me that
he had got wind of the episode, and that it only inspired him with fresh
hostility towards me.
During my walks, which I now took absolutely alone, I thought ever
more deeply—and much to the relief of my mind—over my ideas
concerning that state of human society for which the boldest hopes and
efforts of the socialists and communists, then busily engaged in
constructing their system, offered me but the roughest foundation. These
efforts could begin to have some meaning and value for me only when they
had attained to that political revolution and reconstruction which they
aimed at; for it was only then that I, in my turn, could start my reforms in
art.
At the same time my thoughts were busy with a drama, in which the
Emperor Frederick I. (surnamed ‘Barbarossa’) was to be the hero. In it the
model ruler was portrayed in a manner which lent him the greatest and most
powerful significance. His dignified resignation at the impossibility of
making his ideals prevail was intended not only to present a true transcript
of the arbitrary multifariousness of the things of this world, but also to
arouse sympathy for the hero. I wished to carry out this drama in popular
rhyme, and in the style of the German used by our epic poets of the Middle
Ages, and in this respect the poem Alexander, by the priest Lambert, struck
influential among the new members of parliament. In this wise I found
myself suddenly plunged into quite a new and strange world, and became
acquainted with persons and opinions, the very existence of which until
then I had not even suspected. I found it somewhat trying always to be
obliged to meet these gentlemen at their beer and shrouded in the dense
clouds of their tobacco smoke, and to have to discuss with them matters
which, though very dear to me, must have seemed a little fantastic to their
mind. After a certain Herr von Trutschler, a very handsome, energetic man,
whose seriousness was almost gloomy, had listened to me calmly for some
time, and had told me that he no longer knew anything about the state, but
only about society, and that the latter would know, without either his or my
aid, how it should act in regard to art and to the theatre, I was filled with
such extraordinary feelings, half mingled with shame, that there and then I
gave up, not only all my exertions, but all my hopes as well. The only
reminder I ever had of the whole affair came some while, after when, on
meeting Herr von Lüttichau, I quickly gathered from his attitude to me that
he had got wind of the episode, and that it only inspired him with fresh
hostility towards me.
During my walks, which I now took absolutely alone, I thought ever
more deeply—and much to the relief of my mind—over my ideas
concerning that state of human society for which the boldest hopes and
efforts of the socialists and communists, then busily engaged in
constructing their system, offered me but the roughest foundation. These
efforts could begin to have some meaning and value for me only when they
had attained to that political revolution and reconstruction which they
aimed at; for it was only then that I, in my turn, could start my reforms in
art.
At the same time my thoughts were busy with a drama, in which the
Emperor Frederick I. (surnamed ‘Barbarossa’) was to be the hero. In it the
model ruler was portrayed in a manner which lent him the greatest and most
powerful significance. His dignified resignation at the impossibility of
making his ideals prevail was intended not only to present a true transcript
of the arbitrary multifariousness of the things of this world, but also to
arouse sympathy for the hero. I wished to carry out this drama in popular
rhyme, and in the style of the German used by our epic poets of the Middle
Ages, and in this respect the poem Alexander, by the priest Lambert, struck
Page 415
me as a good example; but I never got further with this play than to sketch
its outline in the broadest manner possible. The five acts were planned in
the following manner: Act i. Imperial Diet in the Roncaglian fields, a
demonstration of the significance of imperial power which should extend
even to the investiture of water and air; Act ii. the siege and capture of
Milan; Act iii. revolt of Henry the Lion and his overthrow at Ligano; Act iv.
Imperial Diet in Augsburg, the humiliation and punishment of Henry the
Lion; Act v. Imperial Diet and grand court assembly at Mainz; peace with
the Lombards, reconciliation with the Pope, acceptance of the Cross, and
the departure for the East. I lost all interest, however, in the carrying out of
this dramatic scheme directly I discovered its resemblance to the subject-
matter of the Nibelungen and Siegfried myths, which possessed a more
powerful attraction for me. The points of similarity which I recognised
between the history and the legend in question then induced me to write a
treatise on the subject; and in this I was assisted by some stimulating
monographs (found in the royal library), written by authors whose names
have now escaped my memory, but which taught me in a very attractive
manner a considerable amount about the old original kingdom of Germany.
Later on I published this fairly extensive essay with the title of Die
Nibelungen, but in working it out I finally lost all inclination to elaborate
the historical material for a real drama.
In direct connection with this I began to sketch a clear summary of the
form which the old original Nibelungen myth had assumed in my mind in
its immediate association with the mythological legend of the gods—a form
which, though full of detail, was yet much condensed in its leading features.
Thanks to this work, I was able to convert the chief part of the material
itself into a musical drama. It was only by degrees, however, and after long
hesitation that I dared to enter more deeply into my plans for this work; for
the thought of the practical realisation of such a work on our stage literally
appalled me. I must confess that it required all the despair which I then felt
of ever having the chance of doing anything more for our theatre, to give
me the necessary courage to begin upon this new work. Until that time I
simply allowed myself to drift, while I meditated listlessly upon the
possibility of things pursuing their course further under the existing
circumstances. In regard to Lohengrin, I had got to that point when I hoped
for nothing more than the best possible production of it at the Dresden
theatre, and felt that I should have to be satisfied in all respects, and for all
its outline in the broadest manner possible. The five acts were planned in
the following manner: Act i. Imperial Diet in the Roncaglian fields, a
demonstration of the significance of imperial power which should extend
even to the investiture of water and air; Act ii. the siege and capture of
Milan; Act iii. revolt of Henry the Lion and his overthrow at Ligano; Act iv.
Imperial Diet in Augsburg, the humiliation and punishment of Henry the
Lion; Act v. Imperial Diet and grand court assembly at Mainz; peace with
the Lombards, reconciliation with the Pope, acceptance of the Cross, and
the departure for the East. I lost all interest, however, in the carrying out of
this dramatic scheme directly I discovered its resemblance to the subject-
matter of the Nibelungen and Siegfried myths, which possessed a more
powerful attraction for me. The points of similarity which I recognised
between the history and the legend in question then induced me to write a
treatise on the subject; and in this I was assisted by some stimulating
monographs (found in the royal library), written by authors whose names
have now escaped my memory, but which taught me in a very attractive
manner a considerable amount about the old original kingdom of Germany.
Later on I published this fairly extensive essay with the title of Die
Nibelungen, but in working it out I finally lost all inclination to elaborate
the historical material for a real drama.
In direct connection with this I began to sketch a clear summary of the
form which the old original Nibelungen myth had assumed in my mind in
its immediate association with the mythological legend of the gods—a form
which, though full of detail, was yet much condensed in its leading features.
Thanks to this work, I was able to convert the chief part of the material
itself into a musical drama. It was only by degrees, however, and after long
hesitation that I dared to enter more deeply into my plans for this work; for
the thought of the practical realisation of such a work on our stage literally
appalled me. I must confess that it required all the despair which I then felt
of ever having the chance of doing anything more for our theatre, to give
me the necessary courage to begin upon this new work. Until that time I
simply allowed myself to drift, while I meditated listlessly upon the
possibility of things pursuing their course further under the existing
circumstances. In regard to Lohengrin, I had got to that point when I hoped
for nothing more than the best possible production of it at the Dresden
theatre, and felt that I should have to be satisfied in all respects, and for all
Page 416
time, if I were able to achieve even that. I had duly announced the
completion of the score to Herr von Lüttichau; but, in consideration of the
unfavourable nature of my circumstances at the time, I had left it entirely to
him to decide when my work should be produced.
Meanwhile the time arrived when the keeper of the Archives of the Royal
Orchestra called to mind that it was just three hundred years since this royal
institution had been founded, and that a jubilee would therefore have to be
celebrated. To this end a great concert festival was planned, the programme
of which was to be made up of the compositions of all the Saxon orchestral
conductors that had lived since the institution had been founded. The whole
body of musicians, with both their conductors at their head, were first to
present their grateful homage to the King in Pillnitz; and on this occasion a
musician was, for the first time, to be elevated to the rank of Knight of the
Civil Order of Merit of Saxony. This musician was my colleague Reissiger.
Until then he had been treated by the court, and by the manager himself, in
the most scornful manner possible, but had, owing to his conspicuous
loyalty at this critical time, especially to me, found exceptional favour in
the eyes of our committees. When he appeared before the public decorated
with the wonderful order, he was greeted with great jubilation by the loyal
audience that filled the theatre on the evening of the festival concert. His
overture to Yelva was also received with a perfect uproar of enthusiastic
applause, such as had never fallen to his lot; whereas the finale of the first
act from Lohengrin, which was produced as the work of the youngest
conductor, was accorded only an indifferent reception. This was all the
more strange as I was quite unaccustomed to such coolness in regard to my
work on the part of the Dresden public. Following upon the concert, there
was a festive supper, and when this was over, as all kinds of speeches were
being made, I freely proclaimed to the orchestra, in a loud and decided tone,
my views as to what was desirable for their perfection in the future.
Hereupon Marschner, who, as a former musical conductor in Dresden, had
been invited to the jubilee celebrations, expressed the opinion that I should
do myself a great deal of harm by holding too good an opinion of the
musicians. He said I ought just to consider how uncultivated these people
were with whom I had to deal; he pointed out that they were trained simply
for the one instrument they played; and asked me whether I did not think
that by discoursing to them on the aspirations of art I would produce not
only confusion, but even perhaps bad blood? Far more pleasant to me than
completion of the score to Herr von Lüttichau; but, in consideration of the
unfavourable nature of my circumstances at the time, I had left it entirely to
him to decide when my work should be produced.
Meanwhile the time arrived when the keeper of the Archives of the Royal
Orchestra called to mind that it was just three hundred years since this royal
institution had been founded, and that a jubilee would therefore have to be
celebrated. To this end a great concert festival was planned, the programme
of which was to be made up of the compositions of all the Saxon orchestral
conductors that had lived since the institution had been founded. The whole
body of musicians, with both their conductors at their head, were first to
present their grateful homage to the King in Pillnitz; and on this occasion a
musician was, for the first time, to be elevated to the rank of Knight of the
Civil Order of Merit of Saxony. This musician was my colleague Reissiger.
Until then he had been treated by the court, and by the manager himself, in
the most scornful manner possible, but had, owing to his conspicuous
loyalty at this critical time, especially to me, found exceptional favour in
the eyes of our committees. When he appeared before the public decorated
with the wonderful order, he was greeted with great jubilation by the loyal
audience that filled the theatre on the evening of the festival concert. His
overture to Yelva was also received with a perfect uproar of enthusiastic
applause, such as had never fallen to his lot; whereas the finale of the first
act from Lohengrin, which was produced as the work of the youngest
conductor, was accorded only an indifferent reception. This was all the
more strange as I was quite unaccustomed to such coolness in regard to my
work on the part of the Dresden public. Following upon the concert, there
was a festive supper, and when this was over, as all kinds of speeches were
being made, I freely proclaimed to the orchestra, in a loud and decided tone,
my views as to what was desirable for their perfection in the future.
Hereupon Marschner, who, as a former musical conductor in Dresden, had
been invited to the jubilee celebrations, expressed the opinion that I should
do myself a great deal of harm by holding too good an opinion of the
musicians. He said I ought just to consider how uncultivated these people
were with whom I had to deal; he pointed out that they were trained simply
for the one instrument they played; and asked me whether I did not think
that by discoursing to them on the aspirations of art I would produce not
only confusion, but even perhaps bad blood? Far more pleasant to me than
Page 417
these festivities is the remembrance of the quiet memorial ceremony which
united us on the morning of the Jubilee Day, with the object of placing
wreaths on Weber’s grave. As nobody could find a word to utter, and even
Marschner was able to give expression only to the very driest and most
trivial of speeches about the departed master, I felt it incumbent upon me to
say a few heartfelt words concerning the memorial ceremony for which we
were gathered together. This brief spell of artistic activity was speedily
broken by fresh excitements, which kept pouring in upon us from the
political world. The events of October in Vienna awakened our liveliest
sympathy, and our walls daily blazed with red and black placards, with
summonses to march on Vienna, with the curse of ‘Red Monarchy,’ as
opposed to the hated ‘Red Republic,’ and with other equally startling
matter. Except for those who were best informed as to the course of events
—and who certainly did not swarm in our streets—these occurrences
aroused great uneasiness everywhere. With the entry of Windischgratz into
Vienna, the acquittal of Frobel and the execution of Blum, it seemed as
though even Dresden were on the eve of an explosion. A vast demonstration
of mourning was organised for Blum, with an endless procession through
the streets. At the head marched the ministry, among whom the people were
particularly glad to see Herr von der Pfordten taking a sympathetic share in
the ceremony, as he had already become an object of suspicion to them.
From that day gloomy forebodings of disaster grew ever more prevalent on
every side. People even went so far as to say, with little attempt at
circumlocution, that the execution of Blum had been an act of friendship on
the part of the Archduchess Sophia to her sister, the Queen of Saxony, for
during his agitation in Leipzig the man had made himself both hated and
feared. Troops of Viennese fugitives, disguised as members of the student
bands, began to arrive in Dresden, and made a formidable addition to its
population, which from this time forth paraded the streets with ever-
increasing confidence. One day, as I was on my way to the theatre to
conduct a performance of Rienzi, the choir-master informed me that several
foreign gentlemen had been asking for me. Thereupon half a dozen persons
presented themselves, greeted me as a brother democrat, and begged me to
procure them free entrance tickets. Among them I recognised a former
dabbler in literature, a man named Hafner, a little hunchback, in a Calabrian
hat cocked at a terrific angle, to whom I had been introduced by Uhl on the
occasion of my visit to the Vienna political club. Great as was my
united us on the morning of the Jubilee Day, with the object of placing
wreaths on Weber’s grave. As nobody could find a word to utter, and even
Marschner was able to give expression only to the very driest and most
trivial of speeches about the departed master, I felt it incumbent upon me to
say a few heartfelt words concerning the memorial ceremony for which we
were gathered together. This brief spell of artistic activity was speedily
broken by fresh excitements, which kept pouring in upon us from the
political world. The events of October in Vienna awakened our liveliest
sympathy, and our walls daily blazed with red and black placards, with
summonses to march on Vienna, with the curse of ‘Red Monarchy,’ as
opposed to the hated ‘Red Republic,’ and with other equally startling
matter. Except for those who were best informed as to the course of events
—and who certainly did not swarm in our streets—these occurrences
aroused great uneasiness everywhere. With the entry of Windischgratz into
Vienna, the acquittal of Frobel and the execution of Blum, it seemed as
though even Dresden were on the eve of an explosion. A vast demonstration
of mourning was organised for Blum, with an endless procession through
the streets. At the head marched the ministry, among whom the people were
particularly glad to see Herr von der Pfordten taking a sympathetic share in
the ceremony, as he had already become an object of suspicion to them.
From that day gloomy forebodings of disaster grew ever more prevalent on
every side. People even went so far as to say, with little attempt at
circumlocution, that the execution of Blum had been an act of friendship on
the part of the Archduchess Sophia to her sister, the Queen of Saxony, for
during his agitation in Leipzig the man had made himself both hated and
feared. Troops of Viennese fugitives, disguised as members of the student
bands, began to arrive in Dresden, and made a formidable addition to its
population, which from this time forth paraded the streets with ever-
increasing confidence. One day, as I was on my way to the theatre to
conduct a performance of Rienzi, the choir-master informed me that several
foreign gentlemen had been asking for me. Thereupon half a dozen persons
presented themselves, greeted me as a brother democrat, and begged me to
procure them free entrance tickets. Among them I recognised a former
dabbler in literature, a man named Hafner, a little hunchback, in a Calabrian
hat cocked at a terrific angle, to whom I had been introduced by Uhl on the
occasion of my visit to the Vienna political club. Great as was my
Page 418
embarrassment at this visit, which evidently astonished our musicians, I felt
in no wise compelled to make any compromising admission, but quietly
went to the booking-office, took six tickets and handed them to my strange
visitors, who parted from me before all the world with much hearty shaking
of hands. Whether this evening call improved my position as musical
conductor in Dresden in the minds of the theatrical officials and others, may
well be doubted; but, at all events, on no occasion was I so frantically called
for after every act as at this particular performance of Rienzi.
Indeed, at this time I seemed to have won over to my side a party of
almost passionate adherents among the theatre-going public, in opposition
to the clique which had shown such marked coldness on the occasion of the
gala concert already mentioned. It mattered not whether Tannhäuser or
Rienzi were being played, I was always greeted with special applause; and
although the political tendencies of this party may have given our
management some cause for alarm, yet it forced them to regard me with a
certain amount of awe. One day Lüttichau proposed to have my Lohengrin
performed at an early date. I explained my reasons for not having offered it
to him before, but declared myself ready to further his wishes, as I
considered the opera company was now sufficiently powerful. The son of
my old friend, F. Heine, had just returned from Paris, where he had been
sent by the Dresden management to study scene-painting under the artists
Desplechin and Dieterle. By way of testing his powers, with a view to an
engagement at the Dresden Royal Theatre, the task of preparing suitable
scenery for this opera was entrusted to him. He had already asked
permission to do this for Lohengrin at the instigation of Lüttichau, who
wished to call attention to my latest work. Consequently, when I gave my
consent, young Heine’s wish was granted.
I regarded this turn of events with no little satisfaction, believing that in
the study of this particular work I should find a wholesome and effective
diversion from all the excitement and confusion of recent events. My
horror, therefore, was all the greater, when young Wilhelm Heine one day
came to my room with the news that the scenery for Lohengrin had been
suddenly countermanded, and instructions given him to prepare for another
opera. I did not make any remark, nor ask the reason for this singular
behaviour. The assurances which Luttichan afterwards made to my wife—if
they were really true—made me regret having laid the chief blame for this
mortification at his door, and having thereby irrevocably alienated my
in no wise compelled to make any compromising admission, but quietly
went to the booking-office, took six tickets and handed them to my strange
visitors, who parted from me before all the world with much hearty shaking
of hands. Whether this evening call improved my position as musical
conductor in Dresden in the minds of the theatrical officials and others, may
well be doubted; but, at all events, on no occasion was I so frantically called
for after every act as at this particular performance of Rienzi.
Indeed, at this time I seemed to have won over to my side a party of
almost passionate adherents among the theatre-going public, in opposition
to the clique which had shown such marked coldness on the occasion of the
gala concert already mentioned. It mattered not whether Tannhäuser or
Rienzi were being played, I was always greeted with special applause; and
although the political tendencies of this party may have given our
management some cause for alarm, yet it forced them to regard me with a
certain amount of awe. One day Lüttichau proposed to have my Lohengrin
performed at an early date. I explained my reasons for not having offered it
to him before, but declared myself ready to further his wishes, as I
considered the opera company was now sufficiently powerful. The son of
my old friend, F. Heine, had just returned from Paris, where he had been
sent by the Dresden management to study scene-painting under the artists
Desplechin and Dieterle. By way of testing his powers, with a view to an
engagement at the Dresden Royal Theatre, the task of preparing suitable
scenery for this opera was entrusted to him. He had already asked
permission to do this for Lohengrin at the instigation of Lüttichau, who
wished to call attention to my latest work. Consequently, when I gave my
consent, young Heine’s wish was granted.
I regarded this turn of events with no little satisfaction, believing that in
the study of this particular work I should find a wholesome and effective
diversion from all the excitement and confusion of recent events. My
horror, therefore, was all the greater, when young Wilhelm Heine one day
came to my room with the news that the scenery for Lohengrin had been
suddenly countermanded, and instructions given him to prepare for another
opera. I did not make any remark, nor ask the reason for this singular
behaviour. The assurances which Luttichan afterwards made to my wife—if
they were really true—made me regret having laid the chief blame for this
mortification at his door, and having thereby irrevocably alienated my
Page 419
sympathy from him. When she asked him about this many years later, he
assured her that he had found the court vehemently hostile to me, and that
his well-meant attempts to produce my work had met with insuperable
obstacles.
However that may have been, the bitterness I now experienced wrought a
decisive effect upon my feelings. Not only did I relinquish all hope of a
reconciliation with the theatre authorities by a splendid production of my
Lohengrin, but I determined to turn my back for ever on the theatre, and to
make no further attempt to meddle with its concerns. By this act I expressed
not merely my utter indifference as to whether I kept my position as
musical conductor or no, but my artistic ambitions also entirely cut me off
from all possibility of ever cultivating modern theatrical conditions again.
I at once proceeded to execute my long-cherished plans for Siegfried’s
Tod, which I had been half afraid of before. In this work I no longer gave a
thought to the Dresden or any other court theatre in the world; my sole
preoccupation was to produce something that should free me, once and for
all, from this irrational subservience. As I could get nothing more from
Röckel in this connection, I now corresponded exclusively with Eduard
Devrient on matters connected with the theatre and dramatic art. When, on
the completion of my poem, I read it to him, he listened with amazement,
and at once realised the fact that such a production would be an absolute
drug in the modern theatrical market, and he naturally could not agree to let
it remain so. On the other hand, he tried so far to reconcile himself to my
work as to try and make it less startling and more adapted for actual
production. He proved the sincerity of his intentions by pointing out my
error in asking too much of the public, and requiring it to supply from its
own knowledge many things necessary for a right under-standing of my
subject-matter, at which I had only hinted in brief and scattered suggestions.
He showed me, for instance, that before Siegfried and Brunhilda are
displayed in a position of bitter hostility towards each other, they ought first
to have been presented in their true and calmer relationship. I had, in fact,
opened the poem of SIEGFRIED’S TOD with those scenes which now
form the first act of the GOTTERDAMMERUNG. The details of
Siegfried’s relation to Brunhilda had been merely outlined to the listeners in
a lyrico-episodical dialogue between the hero’s wife, whom he had left
behind in solitude, and a crowd of Valkyries passing before her rock. To my
assured her that he had found the court vehemently hostile to me, and that
his well-meant attempts to produce my work had met with insuperable
obstacles.
However that may have been, the bitterness I now experienced wrought a
decisive effect upon my feelings. Not only did I relinquish all hope of a
reconciliation with the theatre authorities by a splendid production of my
Lohengrin, but I determined to turn my back for ever on the theatre, and to
make no further attempt to meddle with its concerns. By this act I expressed
not merely my utter indifference as to whether I kept my position as
musical conductor or no, but my artistic ambitions also entirely cut me off
from all possibility of ever cultivating modern theatrical conditions again.
I at once proceeded to execute my long-cherished plans for Siegfried’s
Tod, which I had been half afraid of before. In this work I no longer gave a
thought to the Dresden or any other court theatre in the world; my sole
preoccupation was to produce something that should free me, once and for
all, from this irrational subservience. As I could get nothing more from
Röckel in this connection, I now corresponded exclusively with Eduard
Devrient on matters connected with the theatre and dramatic art. When, on
the completion of my poem, I read it to him, he listened with amazement,
and at once realised the fact that such a production would be an absolute
drug in the modern theatrical market, and he naturally could not agree to let
it remain so. On the other hand, he tried so far to reconcile himself to my
work as to try and make it less startling and more adapted for actual
production. He proved the sincerity of his intentions by pointing out my
error in asking too much of the public, and requiring it to supply from its
own knowledge many things necessary for a right under-standing of my
subject-matter, at which I had only hinted in brief and scattered suggestions.
He showed me, for instance, that before Siegfried and Brunhilda are
displayed in a position of bitter hostility towards each other, they ought first
to have been presented in their true and calmer relationship. I had, in fact,
opened the poem of SIEGFRIED’S TOD with those scenes which now
form the first act of the GOTTERDAMMERUNG. The details of
Siegfried’s relation to Brunhilda had been merely outlined to the listeners in
a lyrico-episodical dialogue between the hero’s wife, whom he had left
behind in solitude, and a crowd of Valkyries passing before her rock. To my
Page 420
great joy, Devrient’s hint on this point directed my thoughts to those scenes
which I afterwards worked out in the prologue of this drama.
This and other matters of a similar nature brought me into intimate
contact with Eduard Devrient, and made our intercourse much more lively
and pleasant. He often invited a select circle of friends to attend dramatic
readings at his house in which I gladly took part, for I found, to my
surprise, that his gift for declamation, which quite forsook him on the stage,
here stood out in strong relief. It was, moreover, a consolation to pour into a
sympathetic ear my worries about my growing unpopularity with the
director. Devrient seemed particularly anxious to prevent a definite breach;
but of this there was little hope. With the approach of winter the court had
returned to town, and once more frequented the theatre, and various signs of
dissatisfaction in high quarters with my behaviour as conductor began to be
manifested. On one occasion the Queen thought that I had conducted
NORMA badly, and on another that I ‘had taken the time wrongly’ in
ROBERT THE DEVIL. As Luettichau had to communicate these
reprimands to me, it was natural that our intercourse at such times should
hardly be of a nature to restore our mutual satisfaction with each other.
Notwithstanding all this, it still seemed possible to prevent matters from
coming to a crisis, though everything continued in a state of agitating
uncertainty and fermentation. At all events the forces of reaction, which
were holding themselves in readiness on every side, were not yet
sufficiently certain that the hour of their triumph had come as not to
consider it advisable for the present, at least, to avoid all provocation.
Consequently our management did not meddle with the musicians of the
royal orchestra, who, in obedience to the spirit of the times, had formed a
union for debate and the protection of their artistic and civic interests. In
this matter one of our youngest musicians, Theodor Uhlig, had been
particularly active. He was a young man, still in his early twenties, and was
a violinist in the orchestra. His face was strikingly mild, intelligent and
noble, and he was conspicuous among his fellows on account of his great
seriousness and his quiet but unusually firm character. He had particularly
attracted my notice on several occasions by his quick insight and extensive
knowledge of music. As I recognised in him a spirit keenly alert in every
direction, and unusually eager for culture, it was not long before I chose
him as my companion in my regular walks—a habit I still continued to
cultivate—and on which Roeckel had hitherto accompanied me. He induced
which I afterwards worked out in the prologue of this drama.
This and other matters of a similar nature brought me into intimate
contact with Eduard Devrient, and made our intercourse much more lively
and pleasant. He often invited a select circle of friends to attend dramatic
readings at his house in which I gladly took part, for I found, to my
surprise, that his gift for declamation, which quite forsook him on the stage,
here stood out in strong relief. It was, moreover, a consolation to pour into a
sympathetic ear my worries about my growing unpopularity with the
director. Devrient seemed particularly anxious to prevent a definite breach;
but of this there was little hope. With the approach of winter the court had
returned to town, and once more frequented the theatre, and various signs of
dissatisfaction in high quarters with my behaviour as conductor began to be
manifested. On one occasion the Queen thought that I had conducted
NORMA badly, and on another that I ‘had taken the time wrongly’ in
ROBERT THE DEVIL. As Luettichau had to communicate these
reprimands to me, it was natural that our intercourse at such times should
hardly be of a nature to restore our mutual satisfaction with each other.
Notwithstanding all this, it still seemed possible to prevent matters from
coming to a crisis, though everything continued in a state of agitating
uncertainty and fermentation. At all events the forces of reaction, which
were holding themselves in readiness on every side, were not yet
sufficiently certain that the hour of their triumph had come as not to
consider it advisable for the present, at least, to avoid all provocation.
Consequently our management did not meddle with the musicians of the
royal orchestra, who, in obedience to the spirit of the times, had formed a
union for debate and the protection of their artistic and civic interests. In
this matter one of our youngest musicians, Theodor Uhlig, had been
particularly active. He was a young man, still in his early twenties, and was
a violinist in the orchestra. His face was strikingly mild, intelligent and
noble, and he was conspicuous among his fellows on account of his great
seriousness and his quiet but unusually firm character. He had particularly
attracted my notice on several occasions by his quick insight and extensive
knowledge of music. As I recognised in him a spirit keenly alert in every
direction, and unusually eager for culture, it was not long before I chose
him as my companion in my regular walks—a habit I still continued to
cultivate—and on which Roeckel had hitherto accompanied me. He induced
Page 421
me to come to a meeting of this union of the orchestral company, in order
that I might form an opinion about it, and encourage and support so
praiseworthy a movement. On this occasion I communicated to its members
the contents of my memorandum to the director, which had been rejected a
year before, and in which I had made suggestions for reforms in the band,
and I also explained further intentions and plans arising therefrom. At the
same time I was obliged to confess that I had lost all hope of carrying out
any projects of the kind through the general management, and must
therefore recommend them to take the initiative vigorously into their own
hands. They acclaimed the idea with enthusiastic approval. Although, as I
have said before, Luettichau left these musicians unmolested in their more
or less democratic union, yet he took care to be informed through spies of
what took place at their highly treasonable gatherings. His chief instrument
was a bugler named Lewy, who, much to the disgust of all his comrades in
the orchestra, was in particularly high favour with the director. He
consequently received precise, or rather exaggerated, accounts of my
appearance there, and thought it was now high time to let me once more
feel the weight of his authority. I was officially summoned to his presence,
and had to listen to a long and wrathful tirade which he had been bottling up
for some time about several matters. I also learned that he knew all about
the plan of theatre reform which I had laid before the ministry. This
knowledge he betrayed in a popular Dresden phrase, which until then I had
never heard; he knew very well, he said, that in a memorandum respecting
the theatre I had ‘made him look ridiculous’ (ihm an den Laden gelegt). In
answer to this I did not refrain from telling him how I intended to act in
retaliation, and when he threatened to report me to the King and demand
my dismissal, I calmly replied that he might do as he pleased, as I was well
assured that I could rely on his Majesty’s justice to hear, not only his
charges, but also my defence. Moreover, I added, this was the only befitting
manner for me to discuss with the King the many points on which I had to
complain, not only in my own interests, but also in those of the theatre and
of art. This was not pleasant hearing for Lüttichau, and he asked how it was
possible for him to try and co-operate with me, when I for my part had
openly declared (to use his own expression) that all labour was wasted upon
him (Hopfen und Malz verloren seien). We had at last to part with mutual
shruggings of the shoulder. My conduct seemed to trouble my former
patron, and he therefore enlisted the tact and moderation of Eduard
that I might form an opinion about it, and encourage and support so
praiseworthy a movement. On this occasion I communicated to its members
the contents of my memorandum to the director, which had been rejected a
year before, and in which I had made suggestions for reforms in the band,
and I also explained further intentions and plans arising therefrom. At the
same time I was obliged to confess that I had lost all hope of carrying out
any projects of the kind through the general management, and must
therefore recommend them to take the initiative vigorously into their own
hands. They acclaimed the idea with enthusiastic approval. Although, as I
have said before, Luettichau left these musicians unmolested in their more
or less democratic union, yet he took care to be informed through spies of
what took place at their highly treasonable gatherings. His chief instrument
was a bugler named Lewy, who, much to the disgust of all his comrades in
the orchestra, was in particularly high favour with the director. He
consequently received precise, or rather exaggerated, accounts of my
appearance there, and thought it was now high time to let me once more
feel the weight of his authority. I was officially summoned to his presence,
and had to listen to a long and wrathful tirade which he had been bottling up
for some time about several matters. I also learned that he knew all about
the plan of theatre reform which I had laid before the ministry. This
knowledge he betrayed in a popular Dresden phrase, which until then I had
never heard; he knew very well, he said, that in a memorandum respecting
the theatre I had ‘made him look ridiculous’ (ihm an den Laden gelegt). In
answer to this I did not refrain from telling him how I intended to act in
retaliation, and when he threatened to report me to the King and demand
my dismissal, I calmly replied that he might do as he pleased, as I was well
assured that I could rely on his Majesty’s justice to hear, not only his
charges, but also my defence. Moreover, I added, this was the only befitting
manner for me to discuss with the King the many points on which I had to
complain, not only in my own interests, but also in those of the theatre and
of art. This was not pleasant hearing for Lüttichau, and he asked how it was
possible for him to try and co-operate with me, when I for my part had
openly declared (to use his own expression) that all labour was wasted upon
him (Hopfen und Malz verloren seien). We had at last to part with mutual
shruggings of the shoulder. My conduct seemed to trouble my former
patron, and he therefore enlisted the tact and moderation of Eduard
Page 422
Devrient in his service, and asked him to use his influence with me to
facilitate some further arrangement between us. But, in spite of all his zeal,
Devrient had to admit with a smile, after we had discussed his message, that
nothing much could be done; and as I persisted in my refusal to meet the
director again in consultation respecting the service of the theatre, he had at
last to recognise that his own wisdom would have to help him out of the
difficulty.
Throughout the whole period during which I was fated to fill the post of
conductor at Dresden, the effects of this dislike on the part of the court and
the director continued to make themselves felt in everything. The orchestral
concerts, which had been organised by me in the previous winter, were this
year placed under Reissiger’s control, and at once sank to the usual level of
ordinary concerts. Public interest quickly waned, and the undertaking could
only with difficulty be kept alive. In opera I was unable to carry out the
proposed revival of the Fliegender Holländer, for which I had found in
Mitterwurzer’s maturer talent an admirable and promising exponent. My
niece Johanna, whom I had destined for the part of Senta, did not like the
role, because it offered little opportunity for splendid costumes. She
preferred ZAMPA and FAVORITA, partly to please her new protector, my
erstwhile RIENZI enthusiast, Tichatschck, partly for the sake of THREE
BRILLIANT COSTUMES which the management had to furnish for each
of these parts. In fact, these two ringleaders of the Dresden opera of that
day had formed an alliance of rebellion against my vigorous rule in the
matter of operatic repertoire. Their opposition, to my great discomfiture,
was crowned by success when they secured the production of this
FAVORITA of Donizetti’s, the arrangement of which I had once been
obliged to undertake for Schlesinger in Paris. I had at first emphatically
refused to have anything to do with this opera, although its principal part
suited my niece’s voice admirably, even in her father’s judgment. But now
that they knew of my feud with the director, and of my voluntary loss of
influence, and finally of my evident disgrace, they thought the opportunity
ripe for compelling me to conduct this tiresome work myself, as it happened
to be my turn.
Besides this, my chief occupation at the royal theatre during this period
consisted in conducting Flotow’s opera MARTHA, which, although it failed
to attract the public, was nevertheless produced with excessive frequency,
owing to its convenient cast. On reviewing the results of my labours in
facilitate some further arrangement between us. But, in spite of all his zeal,
Devrient had to admit with a smile, after we had discussed his message, that
nothing much could be done; and as I persisted in my refusal to meet the
director again in consultation respecting the service of the theatre, he had at
last to recognise that his own wisdom would have to help him out of the
difficulty.
Throughout the whole period during which I was fated to fill the post of
conductor at Dresden, the effects of this dislike on the part of the court and
the director continued to make themselves felt in everything. The orchestral
concerts, which had been organised by me in the previous winter, were this
year placed under Reissiger’s control, and at once sank to the usual level of
ordinary concerts. Public interest quickly waned, and the undertaking could
only with difficulty be kept alive. In opera I was unable to carry out the
proposed revival of the Fliegender Holländer, for which I had found in
Mitterwurzer’s maturer talent an admirable and promising exponent. My
niece Johanna, whom I had destined for the part of Senta, did not like the
role, because it offered little opportunity for splendid costumes. She
preferred ZAMPA and FAVORITA, partly to please her new protector, my
erstwhile RIENZI enthusiast, Tichatschck, partly for the sake of THREE
BRILLIANT COSTUMES which the management had to furnish for each
of these parts. In fact, these two ringleaders of the Dresden opera of that
day had formed an alliance of rebellion against my vigorous rule in the
matter of operatic repertoire. Their opposition, to my great discomfiture,
was crowned by success when they secured the production of this
FAVORITA of Donizetti’s, the arrangement of which I had once been
obliged to undertake for Schlesinger in Paris. I had at first emphatically
refused to have anything to do with this opera, although its principal part
suited my niece’s voice admirably, even in her father’s judgment. But now
that they knew of my feud with the director, and of my voluntary loss of
influence, and finally of my evident disgrace, they thought the opportunity
ripe for compelling me to conduct this tiresome work myself, as it happened
to be my turn.
Besides this, my chief occupation at the royal theatre during this period
consisted in conducting Flotow’s opera MARTHA, which, although it failed
to attract the public, was nevertheless produced with excessive frequency,
owing to its convenient cast. On reviewing the results of my labours in
Page 423
Dresden—where I had now been nearly seven years—I could not help
feeling humiliated when I considered the powerful and energetic impetus I
knew I had given in many directions to the court theatre, and I found myself
obliged to confess that, were I now to leave Dresden, not, the smallest trace
of my influence would remain behind. From various signs I also gathered
that, if ever it should come to a trial before the King between the director
and myself, even if his Majesty were in my favour, yet out of consideration
for the courtier the verdict would go against me.
Nevertheless, on Palm Sunday of the new year, 1849, I received ample
amends. In order to ensure liberal receipts, our orchestra had again decided
to produce Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony. Every one did his utmost to make
this one of our finest performances, and the public took up the matter with
real enthusiasm. Michael Bakunin, unknown to the police, had been present
at the public rehearsal. At its close he walked unhesitatingly up to me in the
orchestra, and said in a loud voice, that if all the music that had ever been
written were lost in the expected world-wide conflagration, we must pledge
ourselves to rescue this symphony, even at the peril of our lives. Not many
weeks after this performance it really seemed as though this world-wide
conflagration would actually be kindled in the streets of Dresden, and that
Bakunin, with whom I had meanwhile become more closely associated
through strange and unusual circumstances, would undertake the office of
chief stoker.
It was long before this date that I first made the acquaintance of this most
remarkable man. For years I had come across his name in the newspapers,
and always under extraordinary circumstances. He turned up in Paris at a
Polish gathering, but although he was a Russian, he declared that it
mattered little whether a man were a Russian or a Pole, so long as he
wanted to be a free man, and that this was all that mattered. I heard
afterwards, through George Herwegh, that he had renounced all his sources
of income as a member of an influential Russian family, and that one day,
when his entire fortune consisted of two francs, he had given them away to
a beggar on the boulevard, because it was irksome to him to be bound by
this possession to take any thought for the morrow. I was informed of his
presence in Dresden one day by Röckel, after the latter had become a
rampant republican. He had taken the Russian into his house, and invited
me to come and make his acquaintance. Bakunin was at that time being
persecuted by the Austrian government for his share in the events which
feeling humiliated when I considered the powerful and energetic impetus I
knew I had given in many directions to the court theatre, and I found myself
obliged to confess that, were I now to leave Dresden, not, the smallest trace
of my influence would remain behind. From various signs I also gathered
that, if ever it should come to a trial before the King between the director
and myself, even if his Majesty were in my favour, yet out of consideration
for the courtier the verdict would go against me.
Nevertheless, on Palm Sunday of the new year, 1849, I received ample
amends. In order to ensure liberal receipts, our orchestra had again decided
to produce Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony. Every one did his utmost to make
this one of our finest performances, and the public took up the matter with
real enthusiasm. Michael Bakunin, unknown to the police, had been present
at the public rehearsal. At its close he walked unhesitatingly up to me in the
orchestra, and said in a loud voice, that if all the music that had ever been
written were lost in the expected world-wide conflagration, we must pledge
ourselves to rescue this symphony, even at the peril of our lives. Not many
weeks after this performance it really seemed as though this world-wide
conflagration would actually be kindled in the streets of Dresden, and that
Bakunin, with whom I had meanwhile become more closely associated
through strange and unusual circumstances, would undertake the office of
chief stoker.
It was long before this date that I first made the acquaintance of this most
remarkable man. For years I had come across his name in the newspapers,
and always under extraordinary circumstances. He turned up in Paris at a
Polish gathering, but although he was a Russian, he declared that it
mattered little whether a man were a Russian or a Pole, so long as he
wanted to be a free man, and that this was all that mattered. I heard
afterwards, through George Herwegh, that he had renounced all his sources
of income as a member of an influential Russian family, and that one day,
when his entire fortune consisted of two francs, he had given them away to
a beggar on the boulevard, because it was irksome to him to be bound by
this possession to take any thought for the morrow. I was informed of his
presence in Dresden one day by Röckel, after the latter had become a
rampant republican. He had taken the Russian into his house, and invited
me to come and make his acquaintance. Bakunin was at that time being
persecuted by the Austrian government for his share in the events which
Page 424
took place in Prague in the summer of 1848, and because he was a member
of the Slav Congress which had preceded them. He had consequently
sought refuge in our city, as he did not wish to settle too far from the
Bohemian frontier. The extraordinary sensation he had created in Prague
arose from the fact that, when the Czechs sought the protection of Russia
against the dreaded Germanising policy of Austria, he conjured them to
defend themselves with fire and sword against those very Russians, and
indeed against any other people who lived under the rule of a despotism like
that of the Tsars. This superficial acquaintance with Balumin’s aims had
sufficed to change the purely national prejudices of the Germans against
him into sympathy. When I met him, therefore, under the humble shelter of
Röckel’s roof, I was immediately struck by his singular and altogether
imposing personality. He was in the full bloom of manhood, anywhere
between thirty and forty years of age. Everything about him was colossal,
and he was full of a primitive exuberance and strength. I never gathered that
he set much store by my acquaintance. Indeed, he did not seem to care for
merely intellectual men; what he demanded was men of reckless energy. As
I afterwards perceived, theory in this case had more weight with him than
purely personal sentiment; and he talked much and expatiated freely on the
matter. His general mode of discussion was the Socratic method, and he
seemed quite at his ease when, stretched on his host’s hard sofa, he could
argue discursively with a crowd of all sorts of men on the problems of
revolution. On these occasions he invariably got the best of the argument. It
was impossible to triumph against his opinions, stated as they were with the
utmost conviction, and overstepping in every direction even the extremest
bounds of radicalism. So communicative was he, that on the very first
evening of our meeting he gave me full details about the various stages of
his development, he was a Russian officer of high birth, but smarting under
the yoke of the narrowest martial tyranny, he had been led by a study of
Rousseau’s writings to escape to Germany under pretence of taking
furlough. In Berlin he had flung himself into the study of philosophy with
all the zest of a barbarian newly awakened to civilisation. Hegel’s
philosophy was the one which was the rage at that moment, and he soon
became such an expert in it, that he had been able to hurl that master’s most
famous disciples from the saddle of their own philosophy, in a thesis
couched in terms of the strictest Hegelian dialectic. After he had got
philosophy off his chest, as he expressed it, he proceeded to Switzerland,
of the Slav Congress which had preceded them. He had consequently
sought refuge in our city, as he did not wish to settle too far from the
Bohemian frontier. The extraordinary sensation he had created in Prague
arose from the fact that, when the Czechs sought the protection of Russia
against the dreaded Germanising policy of Austria, he conjured them to
defend themselves with fire and sword against those very Russians, and
indeed against any other people who lived under the rule of a despotism like
that of the Tsars. This superficial acquaintance with Balumin’s aims had
sufficed to change the purely national prejudices of the Germans against
him into sympathy. When I met him, therefore, under the humble shelter of
Röckel’s roof, I was immediately struck by his singular and altogether
imposing personality. He was in the full bloom of manhood, anywhere
between thirty and forty years of age. Everything about him was colossal,
and he was full of a primitive exuberance and strength. I never gathered that
he set much store by my acquaintance. Indeed, he did not seem to care for
merely intellectual men; what he demanded was men of reckless energy. As
I afterwards perceived, theory in this case had more weight with him than
purely personal sentiment; and he talked much and expatiated freely on the
matter. His general mode of discussion was the Socratic method, and he
seemed quite at his ease when, stretched on his host’s hard sofa, he could
argue discursively with a crowd of all sorts of men on the problems of
revolution. On these occasions he invariably got the best of the argument. It
was impossible to triumph against his opinions, stated as they were with the
utmost conviction, and overstepping in every direction even the extremest
bounds of radicalism. So communicative was he, that on the very first
evening of our meeting he gave me full details about the various stages of
his development, he was a Russian officer of high birth, but smarting under
the yoke of the narrowest martial tyranny, he had been led by a study of
Rousseau’s writings to escape to Germany under pretence of taking
furlough. In Berlin he had flung himself into the study of philosophy with
all the zest of a barbarian newly awakened to civilisation. Hegel’s
philosophy was the one which was the rage at that moment, and he soon
became such an expert in it, that he had been able to hurl that master’s most
famous disciples from the saddle of their own philosophy, in a thesis
couched in terms of the strictest Hegelian dialectic. After he had got
philosophy off his chest, as he expressed it, he proceeded to Switzerland,
Page 425
where he preached communism, and thence wandered over France and
Germany back to the borderland of the Slav world, from which quarter he
looked for the regeneration of humanity, because the Slavs had been less
enervated by civilisation. His hopes in this respect were centred in the more
strongly pronounced Slav type characteristic of the Russian peasant class.
In the natural detestation of the Russian serf for his cruel oppressor the
nobleman, he believed he could trace a substratum of simple-minded
brotherly love, and that instinct which leads animals to hate the men who
hunt them. In support of this idea he cited the childish, almost demoniac
delight of the Russian people in fire, a quality on which Rostopschin
calculated in his strategic burning of Moscow. He argued that all that was
necessary to set in motion a world-wide movement was to convince the
Russian peasant, in whom the natural goodness of oppressed human nature
had preserved its most childlike characteristics, that it was perfectly right
and well pleasing to God for them to burn their lords’ castles, with
everything in and about them. The least that could result from such a
movement would be the destruction of all those things which, rightly
considered, must appear, even to Europe’s most philosophical thinkers, the
real source of all the misery of the modern world. To set these destructive
forces in action appeared to him the only object worthy of a sensible man’s
activity. (Even while he was preaching these horrible doctrines, Bakunin,
noticing that my eyes troubled me, shielded them with his outstretched hand
from the naked light for a full hour, in spite of my protestations.) This
annihilation of all civilisation was the goal upon which his heart was set.
Meanwhile it amused him to utilise every lever of political agitation he
could lay hands on for the advancement of this aim, and in so doing he
often found cause for ironical merriment. In his retreat he received people
belonging to every shade of revolutionary thought. Nearest to him stood
those of Slav nationality, because these, he thought, would be the most
convenient and effective weapons he could use in the uprooting of Russian
despotism. In spite of their republic and their socialism a la Proudhon, he
thought nothing of the French, and as for the Germans, he never mentioned
them to me. Democracy, republicanism, and anything else of the kind he
regarded as unworthy of serious consideration.
Every objection raised by those who had the slightest wish to reconstruct
what had been demolished, he met with overwhelming criticism. I well
remember on one occasion that a Pole, startled by his theories, maintained
Germany back to the borderland of the Slav world, from which quarter he
looked for the regeneration of humanity, because the Slavs had been less
enervated by civilisation. His hopes in this respect were centred in the more
strongly pronounced Slav type characteristic of the Russian peasant class.
In the natural detestation of the Russian serf for his cruel oppressor the
nobleman, he believed he could trace a substratum of simple-minded
brotherly love, and that instinct which leads animals to hate the men who
hunt them. In support of this idea he cited the childish, almost demoniac
delight of the Russian people in fire, a quality on which Rostopschin
calculated in his strategic burning of Moscow. He argued that all that was
necessary to set in motion a world-wide movement was to convince the
Russian peasant, in whom the natural goodness of oppressed human nature
had preserved its most childlike characteristics, that it was perfectly right
and well pleasing to God for them to burn their lords’ castles, with
everything in and about them. The least that could result from such a
movement would be the destruction of all those things which, rightly
considered, must appear, even to Europe’s most philosophical thinkers, the
real source of all the misery of the modern world. To set these destructive
forces in action appeared to him the only object worthy of a sensible man’s
activity. (Even while he was preaching these horrible doctrines, Bakunin,
noticing that my eyes troubled me, shielded them with his outstretched hand
from the naked light for a full hour, in spite of my protestations.) This
annihilation of all civilisation was the goal upon which his heart was set.
Meanwhile it amused him to utilise every lever of political agitation he
could lay hands on for the advancement of this aim, and in so doing he
often found cause for ironical merriment. In his retreat he received people
belonging to every shade of revolutionary thought. Nearest to him stood
those of Slav nationality, because these, he thought, would be the most
convenient and effective weapons he could use in the uprooting of Russian
despotism. In spite of their republic and their socialism a la Proudhon, he
thought nothing of the French, and as for the Germans, he never mentioned
them to me. Democracy, republicanism, and anything else of the kind he
regarded as unworthy of serious consideration.
Every objection raised by those who had the slightest wish to reconstruct
what had been demolished, he met with overwhelming criticism. I well
remember on one occasion that a Pole, startled by his theories, maintained
Page 426
that there must be an organised state to guarantee the individual in the
possession of the fields he had cultivated. ‘What!’ he answered; ‘would you
carefully fence in your field to provide a livelihood for the police again!’
This shut the mouth of the terrified Pole. He comforted himself by saying
that the creators of the new order of things would arise of themselves, but
that our sole business in the meantime was to find the power to destroy. Was
any one of us so mad as to fancy that he would survive the desired
destruction? We ought to imagine the whole of Europe with St. Petersburg,
Paris, and London transformed into a vast rubbish-heap. How could we
expect the kindlers of such a fire to retain any consciousness after so vast a
devastation? He used to puzzle any who professed their readiness for self-
sacrifice by telling them it was not the so-called tyrants who were so
obnoxious, but the smug Philistines. As a type of these he pointed to a
Protestant parson, and declared that he would not believe he had really
reached the full stature of a man until he saw him commit his own
parsonage, with his wife and child, to the flames.
I was all the more perplexed for a while, in the face of such dreadful
ideas, by the fact that Bakunin in other respects proved a really amiable and
tender-hearted man. He was fully alive to my own anxiety and despair with
regard to the risk I ran of forever destroying my ideals and hopes for the
future of art. It is true, he declined to receive any further instruction
concerning these artistic schemes, and would not even look at my work on
the Nibelungen saga. I had just then been inspired by a study of the Gospels
to conceive the plan of a tragedy for the ideal stage of the future, entitled
Jesus of Nazareth. Bakunin begged me to spare him any details; and when I
sought to win him over to my project by a few verbal hints, he wished me
luck, but insisted that I must at all costs make Jesus appear as a weak
character. As for the music of the piece, he advised me, amid all the
variations, to use only one set of phrases, namely: for the tenor, ‘Off with
His head!’; for the soprano, ‘Hang Him!’; and for the basso continuo, ‘Fire!
fire!’ And yet I felt more sympathetically drawn towards this prodigy of a
man when I one day induced him to hear me play and sing the first scenes
of my Fliegender Holländer. After listening with more attention than most
people gave, he exclaimed, during a momentary pause, ‘That is
stupendously fine!’ and wanted to hear more.
As his life of permanent concealment was very dull, I occasionally
invited him to spend an evening with me. For supper my wife set before
possession of the fields he had cultivated. ‘What!’ he answered; ‘would you
carefully fence in your field to provide a livelihood for the police again!’
This shut the mouth of the terrified Pole. He comforted himself by saying
that the creators of the new order of things would arise of themselves, but
that our sole business in the meantime was to find the power to destroy. Was
any one of us so mad as to fancy that he would survive the desired
destruction? We ought to imagine the whole of Europe with St. Petersburg,
Paris, and London transformed into a vast rubbish-heap. How could we
expect the kindlers of such a fire to retain any consciousness after so vast a
devastation? He used to puzzle any who professed their readiness for self-
sacrifice by telling them it was not the so-called tyrants who were so
obnoxious, but the smug Philistines. As a type of these he pointed to a
Protestant parson, and declared that he would not believe he had really
reached the full stature of a man until he saw him commit his own
parsonage, with his wife and child, to the flames.
I was all the more perplexed for a while, in the face of such dreadful
ideas, by the fact that Bakunin in other respects proved a really amiable and
tender-hearted man. He was fully alive to my own anxiety and despair with
regard to the risk I ran of forever destroying my ideals and hopes for the
future of art. It is true, he declined to receive any further instruction
concerning these artistic schemes, and would not even look at my work on
the Nibelungen saga. I had just then been inspired by a study of the Gospels
to conceive the plan of a tragedy for the ideal stage of the future, entitled
Jesus of Nazareth. Bakunin begged me to spare him any details; and when I
sought to win him over to my project by a few verbal hints, he wished me
luck, but insisted that I must at all costs make Jesus appear as a weak
character. As for the music of the piece, he advised me, amid all the
variations, to use only one set of phrases, namely: for the tenor, ‘Off with
His head!’; for the soprano, ‘Hang Him!’; and for the basso continuo, ‘Fire!
fire!’ And yet I felt more sympathetically drawn towards this prodigy of a
man when I one day induced him to hear me play and sing the first scenes
of my Fliegender Holländer. After listening with more attention than most
people gave, he exclaimed, during a momentary pause, ‘That is
stupendously fine!’ and wanted to hear more.
As his life of permanent concealment was very dull, I occasionally
invited him to spend an evening with me. For supper my wife set before
Page 427
him finely cut slices of sausage and meat, which he at once devoured
wholesale, instead of spreading them frugally on his bread in Saxon
fashion. Noticing Minna’s alarm at this, I was guilty of the weakness of
telling him how we were accustomed to consume such viands, whereupon
he reassured me with a laugh, saying that it was quite enough, only he
would like to eat what was set before him in his own way. I was similarly
astonished at the manner in which he drank wine from our ordinary-sized
small glasses. As a matter of fact he detested wine, which only satisfied his
craving for alcoholic stimulants in such paltry, prolonged, and subdivided
doses; whereas a stiff glass of brandy, swallowed at a gulp, at once
produced the same result, which, after all, was only temporarily attained.
Above all, he scorned the sentiment which seeks to prolong enjoyment by
moderation, arguing that a true man should only strive to still the cravings
of nature, and that the only real pleasure in life worthy of a man was love.
wholesale, instead of spreading them frugally on his bread in Saxon
fashion. Noticing Minna’s alarm at this, I was guilty of the weakness of
telling him how we were accustomed to consume such viands, whereupon
he reassured me with a laugh, saying that it was quite enough, only he
would like to eat what was set before him in his own way. I was similarly
astonished at the manner in which he drank wine from our ordinary-sized
small glasses. As a matter of fact he detested wine, which only satisfied his
craving for alcoholic stimulants in such paltry, prolonged, and subdivided
doses; whereas a stiff glass of brandy, swallowed at a gulp, at once
produced the same result, which, after all, was only temporarily attained.
Above all, he scorned the sentiment which seeks to prolong enjoyment by
moderation, arguing that a true man should only strive to still the cravings
of nature, and that the only real pleasure in life worthy of a man was love.
Page 428
These and other similar little characteristics showed clearly that in this
remarkable man the purest impulses of an ideal humanity conflicted
strangely with a savagery entirely inimical to all civilisation, so that my
feelings during my intercourse with him fluctuated between involuntary
horror and irresistible attraction. I frequently called for him to share my
lonely wanderings. This he gladly did, not only for the sake of necessary
bodily exercise, but also because he could do so in this part of the world
without fear of meeting his pursuers. My attempts during our conversations
to instruct him more fully regarding my artistic aims remained quite
unavailing as long as we were unable to quit the field of mere discussion.
All these things seemed to him premature. He refused to admit that out of
the very needs of the evil present all laws for the future would have to be
evolved, and that these, moreover, must be moulded upon quite different
ideas of social culture. Seeing that he continued to urge destruction, and
again destruction, I had at last to inquire how my wonderful friend proposed
to set this work of destruction in operation. It then soon became clear, as I
had suspected it would, and as the event soon proved, that with this man of
boundless activity everything rested upon the most impossible hypotheses.
Doubtless I, with my hopes of a future artistic remodelling of human
society, appeared to him to be floating in the barren air; yet it soon became
obvious to me that his assumptions as to the unavoidable demolition of all
the institutions of culture were at least equally visionary. My first idea was
that Bakunin was the centre of an international conspiracy; but his practical
plans seem originally to have been restricted to a project for revolutionising
Prague, where he relied merely on a union formed among a handful of
students. Believing that the time had now come to strike a blow, he
prepared himself one evening to go there. This proceeding was not free
from danger, and he set off under the protection of a passport made out for
an English merchant. First of all, however, with the view of adapting
himself to the most Philistine culture, he had to submit his huge beard and
bushy hair to the tender mercies of the razor and shears. As no barber was
available, Röckel had to undertake the task. A small group of friends
watched the operation, which had to be executed with a dull razor, causing
no little pain, under which none but the victim himself remained passive.
remarkable man the purest impulses of an ideal humanity conflicted
strangely with a savagery entirely inimical to all civilisation, so that my
feelings during my intercourse with him fluctuated between involuntary
horror and irresistible attraction. I frequently called for him to share my
lonely wanderings. This he gladly did, not only for the sake of necessary
bodily exercise, but also because he could do so in this part of the world
without fear of meeting his pursuers. My attempts during our conversations
to instruct him more fully regarding my artistic aims remained quite
unavailing as long as we were unable to quit the field of mere discussion.
All these things seemed to him premature. He refused to admit that out of
the very needs of the evil present all laws for the future would have to be
evolved, and that these, moreover, must be moulded upon quite different
ideas of social culture. Seeing that he continued to urge destruction, and
again destruction, I had at last to inquire how my wonderful friend proposed
to set this work of destruction in operation. It then soon became clear, as I
had suspected it would, and as the event soon proved, that with this man of
boundless activity everything rested upon the most impossible hypotheses.
Doubtless I, with my hopes of a future artistic remodelling of human
society, appeared to him to be floating in the barren air; yet it soon became
obvious to me that his assumptions as to the unavoidable demolition of all
the institutions of culture were at least equally visionary. My first idea was
that Bakunin was the centre of an international conspiracy; but his practical
plans seem originally to have been restricted to a project for revolutionising
Prague, where he relied merely on a union formed among a handful of
students. Believing that the time had now come to strike a blow, he
prepared himself one evening to go there. This proceeding was not free
from danger, and he set off under the protection of a passport made out for
an English merchant. First of all, however, with the view of adapting
himself to the most Philistine culture, he had to submit his huge beard and
bushy hair to the tender mercies of the razor and shears. As no barber was
available, Röckel had to undertake the task. A small group of friends
watched the operation, which had to be executed with a dull razor, causing
no little pain, under which none but the victim himself remained passive.
Page 429
We bade farewell to Bakunin with the firm conviction that we should never
see him again alive. But in a week he was back once more, as he had
realised immediately what a distorted account he had received as to the
state of things in Prague, where all he found ready for him was a mere
handful of childish students. These admissions made him the butt of
Röckel’s good-humoured chaff, and after this he won the reputation among
us of being a mere revolutionary, who was content with theoretical
conspiracy. Very similar to his expectations from the Prague students were
his presumptions with regard to the Russian people. These also afterwards
proved to be entirely groundless, and based merely on gratuitous
assumptions drawn from the supposed nature of things. I consequently
found myself driven to explain the universal belief in the terrible
dangerousness of this man by his theoretical views, as expressed here and
elsewhere, and not as arising from any actual experience of his practical
activity. But I was soon to become almost an eye-witness of the fact that his
personal conduct was never for a moment swayed by prudence, such as one
is accustomed to meet in those whose theories are not seriously meant. This
was shortly to be proved in the momentous insurrection of May, 1849.
The winter of this year, up to the spring of 1849, passed in a many-sided
development of my position and temper, as I have described them, that is to
say, in a sort of dull agitation. My latest artistic occupation had been the
five-act drama, Jesus of Nazareth, just mentioned. Henceforth I lingered on
in a state of brooding instability, full of expectation, yet without any
definite wish. I felt fully convinced that my activity in Dresden, as an artist,
had come to an end, and I was only waiting for the pressure of
circumstances to shake myself free. On the other hand, the whole political
situation, both in Saxony and the rest of Germany, tended inevitably
towards a catastrophe. Day by day this drew nearer, and I flattered myself
into regarding my own personal fate as interwoven with this universal
unrest. Now that the powers of reaction were everywhere more and more
openly bracing themselves for conflict, the final decisive struggle seemed
indeed close at hand. My feelings of partisanship were not sufficiently
passionate to make me desire to take any active share in these conflicts. I
was merely conscious of an impulse to give myself up recklessly to the
stream of events, no matter whither it might lead.
Just at this moment, however, an entirely new influence forced itself in a
most strange fashion into my fortunes, and was at first greeted by me with a
see him again alive. But in a week he was back once more, as he had
realised immediately what a distorted account he had received as to the
state of things in Prague, where all he found ready for him was a mere
handful of childish students. These admissions made him the butt of
Röckel’s good-humoured chaff, and after this he won the reputation among
us of being a mere revolutionary, who was content with theoretical
conspiracy. Very similar to his expectations from the Prague students were
his presumptions with regard to the Russian people. These also afterwards
proved to be entirely groundless, and based merely on gratuitous
assumptions drawn from the supposed nature of things. I consequently
found myself driven to explain the universal belief in the terrible
dangerousness of this man by his theoretical views, as expressed here and
elsewhere, and not as arising from any actual experience of his practical
activity. But I was soon to become almost an eye-witness of the fact that his
personal conduct was never for a moment swayed by prudence, such as one
is accustomed to meet in those whose theories are not seriously meant. This
was shortly to be proved in the momentous insurrection of May, 1849.
The winter of this year, up to the spring of 1849, passed in a many-sided
development of my position and temper, as I have described them, that is to
say, in a sort of dull agitation. My latest artistic occupation had been the
five-act drama, Jesus of Nazareth, just mentioned. Henceforth I lingered on
in a state of brooding instability, full of expectation, yet without any
definite wish. I felt fully convinced that my activity in Dresden, as an artist,
had come to an end, and I was only waiting for the pressure of
circumstances to shake myself free. On the other hand, the whole political
situation, both in Saxony and the rest of Germany, tended inevitably
towards a catastrophe. Day by day this drew nearer, and I flattered myself
into regarding my own personal fate as interwoven with this universal
unrest. Now that the powers of reaction were everywhere more and more
openly bracing themselves for conflict, the final decisive struggle seemed
indeed close at hand. My feelings of partisanship were not sufficiently
passionate to make me desire to take any active share in these conflicts. I
was merely conscious of an impulse to give myself up recklessly to the
stream of events, no matter whither it might lead.
Just at this moment, however, an entirely new influence forced itself in a
most strange fashion into my fortunes, and was at first greeted by me with a
Page 430
smile of scepticism. Liszt wrote announcing an early production in Weimar
of my Tannhäuser under his own conductorship—the first that had taken
place outside Dresden—and he added with great modesty that this was
merely a fulfilment of his own personal desire. In order to ensure success he
had sent a special invitation to Tichatschek to be his guest for the two first
performances. When the latter returned he said that the production had, on
the whole, been a success, which surprised me very much. I received a gold
snuff-box from the Grand Duke as a keepsake, which I continued to use
until the year 1864. All this was new and strange to me, and I was still
inclined to regard this otherwise agreeable occurrence as a fleeting episode,
due to the friendly feeling of a great artist. ‘What does this mean for me?’ I
asked myself. ‘Has it come too early or too late?’ But a very cordial letter
from Liszt induced me to visit Weimar for a few days later on, for a third
performance of Tannhausar, which was to be carried out entirely by native
talent, with a view to the permanent addition of this opera to the repertoire.
For this purpose I obtained leave of absence from my management for the
second week in May.
Only a few days elapsed before the execution of this little plan; but they
were destined to be momentous ones. On the 1st of May the Chambers were
dissolved by the new Beust ministry, which the King had charged with
carrying out his proposed reactionary policy. This event imposed upon me
the friendly task of caring for Röckel and his family. Hitherto his position
as a deputy had shielded him from the danger of criminal prosecution; but
as soon as the Chambers were dissolved this protection was withdrawn, and
he had to escape by flight from being arrested again. As I could do little to
help him in this matter, I promised at least to provide for the continued
publication of his popular Volksblatt, mainly because the proceeds from this
would support his family. Scarcely was Röckel safely across the Bohemian
frontier, while I was still toiling at great inconvenience to myself in the
printer’s office, in order to provide material for an issue of his paper, when
the long-expected storm burst over Dresden. Emergency deputations,
nightly mob demonstrations, stormy meetings of the various unions, and all
the other signs that precede a swift decision in the streets, manifested
themselves. On the 3rd May the demeanour of the crowds moving in our
thoroughfares plainly showed that this consummation would soon be
reached, as was undoubtedly desired. Each local deputation which
petitioned for the recognition of the German constitution, which was the
of my Tannhäuser under his own conductorship—the first that had taken
place outside Dresden—and he added with great modesty that this was
merely a fulfilment of his own personal desire. In order to ensure success he
had sent a special invitation to Tichatschek to be his guest for the two first
performances. When the latter returned he said that the production had, on
the whole, been a success, which surprised me very much. I received a gold
snuff-box from the Grand Duke as a keepsake, which I continued to use
until the year 1864. All this was new and strange to me, and I was still
inclined to regard this otherwise agreeable occurrence as a fleeting episode,
due to the friendly feeling of a great artist. ‘What does this mean for me?’ I
asked myself. ‘Has it come too early or too late?’ But a very cordial letter
from Liszt induced me to visit Weimar for a few days later on, for a third
performance of Tannhausar, which was to be carried out entirely by native
talent, with a view to the permanent addition of this opera to the repertoire.
For this purpose I obtained leave of absence from my management for the
second week in May.
Only a few days elapsed before the execution of this little plan; but they
were destined to be momentous ones. On the 1st of May the Chambers were
dissolved by the new Beust ministry, which the King had charged with
carrying out his proposed reactionary policy. This event imposed upon me
the friendly task of caring for Röckel and his family. Hitherto his position
as a deputy had shielded him from the danger of criminal prosecution; but
as soon as the Chambers were dissolved this protection was withdrawn, and
he had to escape by flight from being arrested again. As I could do little to
help him in this matter, I promised at least to provide for the continued
publication of his popular Volksblatt, mainly because the proceeds from this
would support his family. Scarcely was Röckel safely across the Bohemian
frontier, while I was still toiling at great inconvenience to myself in the
printer’s office, in order to provide material for an issue of his paper, when
the long-expected storm burst over Dresden. Emergency deputations,
nightly mob demonstrations, stormy meetings of the various unions, and all
the other signs that precede a swift decision in the streets, manifested
themselves. On the 3rd May the demeanour of the crowds moving in our
thoroughfares plainly showed that this consummation would soon be
reached, as was undoubtedly desired. Each local deputation which
petitioned for the recognition of the German constitution, which was the
Page 431
universal cry, was refused an audience by the government, and this with a
peremptoriness which at last became startling. I was present one afternoon
at a committee meeting of the Vaterlands-Verein, although merely as a
representative of Röckel’s Volksblatt, for whose continuance, both from
economic as well as humane motives, I felt pledged. Here I was at once
absorbed in watching the conduct and demeanour of the men whom popular
favour had raised to the leadership of such unions. It was quite evident that
events had passed beyond the control of these persons; more particularly
were they utterly at a loss as to how to deal with that peculiar terrorism
exerted by the lower classes which is always so ready to react upon the
representatives of democratic theories. On every side I heard a medley of
wild proposals and hesitating responses. One of the chief subjects under
debate was the necessity of preparing for defence. Arms, and how to
procure them, were eagerly discussed, but all in the midst of great disorder;
and when at last they discovered that it was time to break up, the only
impression I received was one of the wildest confusion. I loft the hall with a
young painter named Kaufmann, from whose hand I had previously seen a
series of cartoons in the Dresden Art Exhibition, illustrating ‘The History of
the Mind.’ One day I had seen the King of Saxony standing before one of
these, representing the torture of a heretic under the Spanish Inquisition,
and observed him turn away with a disapproving shake of the head from so
abstruse a subject. I was on my way home, deep in conversation with this
man, whose pale face and troubled look betrayed that he foresaw the
disaster that was imminent, when, just as we reached the Postplatz, near the
fountain erected from Semper’s design, the clang of bells from the
neighbouring tower of St. Ann’s Church suddenly sounded the tocsin of
revolt. With a terrified cry, ‘Good God, it has begun!’ my companion
vanished from my side. He wrote to me—afterwards to say that he was
living as a fugitive in Berne, but I never saw his face again.
The clang of this bell, so close at hand, made a profound impression upon
me also. It was a very sunny afternoon, and I at once noticed the same
phenomenon which Goethe describes in his attempt to depict his own
sensations during the bombardment of Valmy. The whole square looked as
though it were illuminated by a dark yellow, almost brown, light, such as I
had once before seen in Magdeburg during an eclipse of the sun. My most
pronounced sensation beyond this was one of great, almost extravagant,
satisfaction. I felt a sudden strange longing to play with something hitherto
peremptoriness which at last became startling. I was present one afternoon
at a committee meeting of the Vaterlands-Verein, although merely as a
representative of Röckel’s Volksblatt, for whose continuance, both from
economic as well as humane motives, I felt pledged. Here I was at once
absorbed in watching the conduct and demeanour of the men whom popular
favour had raised to the leadership of such unions. It was quite evident that
events had passed beyond the control of these persons; more particularly
were they utterly at a loss as to how to deal with that peculiar terrorism
exerted by the lower classes which is always so ready to react upon the
representatives of democratic theories. On every side I heard a medley of
wild proposals and hesitating responses. One of the chief subjects under
debate was the necessity of preparing for defence. Arms, and how to
procure them, were eagerly discussed, but all in the midst of great disorder;
and when at last they discovered that it was time to break up, the only
impression I received was one of the wildest confusion. I loft the hall with a
young painter named Kaufmann, from whose hand I had previously seen a
series of cartoons in the Dresden Art Exhibition, illustrating ‘The History of
the Mind.’ One day I had seen the King of Saxony standing before one of
these, representing the torture of a heretic under the Spanish Inquisition,
and observed him turn away with a disapproving shake of the head from so
abstruse a subject. I was on my way home, deep in conversation with this
man, whose pale face and troubled look betrayed that he foresaw the
disaster that was imminent, when, just as we reached the Postplatz, near the
fountain erected from Semper’s design, the clang of bells from the
neighbouring tower of St. Ann’s Church suddenly sounded the tocsin of
revolt. With a terrified cry, ‘Good God, it has begun!’ my companion
vanished from my side. He wrote to me—afterwards to say that he was
living as a fugitive in Berne, but I never saw his face again.
The clang of this bell, so close at hand, made a profound impression upon
me also. It was a very sunny afternoon, and I at once noticed the same
phenomenon which Goethe describes in his attempt to depict his own
sensations during the bombardment of Valmy. The whole square looked as
though it were illuminated by a dark yellow, almost brown, light, such as I
had once before seen in Magdeburg during an eclipse of the sun. My most
pronounced sensation beyond this was one of great, almost extravagant,
satisfaction. I felt a sudden strange longing to play with something hitherto
Page 432
regarded as dangerous and important. My first idea, suggested probably by
the vicinity of the square, was to inquire at Tichatschek’s house for the gun
which, as an enthusiastic Sunday sportsman, he was accustomed to use. I
only found his wife at home, as he was away on a holiday tour. Her evident
terror as to what was going to happen provoked me to uncontrollable
laughter. I advised her to lodge her husband’s gun in a place of safety, by
handing it to the committee of the Vaterlands-Verein in return for a receipt,
as it might otherwise soon be requisitioned by the mob. I have since learned
that my eccentric behaviour on this occasion, was afterwards reckoned
against me as a serious crime. I then returned to the streets, to see whether
anything beyond a ringing of bells and a yellowish eclipse of the sun might
be going on in the town, I first made my way to the Old Market-place,
where I noticed a group of men gathered round a vociferous orator. It was
also an agreeable surprise to me to see Schroder-Devrient descending at the
door of a hotel. She had just arrived from Merlin, and was keenly excited
by the news which had reached her, that the populace had already been fired
upon. As she had only recently seen an abortive insurrection crushed by
arms in Berlin, she was indignant to find the same things happening in her
‘peaceful Dresden’ as she termed it.
When she turned to me from the stolid crowd, which had complacently
been listening to her passionate outpourings, she seemed relieved at finding
some one to whom she could appeal to oppose these horrible proceedings
with all his might. I met her on another occasion at the house of my old
friend Heine, where she had taken refuge. When she noticed my
indifference she again adjured me to use every possible effort to prevent the
senseless, suicidal conflict. I heard afterwards that a charge of high treason
on account of sedition had been brought against Schroder-Devrient by
reason of her conduct in regard to this matter. She had to prove her
innocence in a court of law, so as to establish beyond dispute her claim to
the pension which she had been promised by contract for her many years’
service in Dresden as an opera-singer.
On the 3rd of May I betook myself direct to that quarter of the town
where I heard unpleasant rumours of a sanguinary conflict having taken
place. I afterwards learned that the actual cause of the dispute between the
civil and military power had arisen when the watch had been changed in
front of the Arsenal. At that moment the mob, under a bold leader, had
seized the opportunity to take forcible possession of the armoury. A display
the vicinity of the square, was to inquire at Tichatschek’s house for the gun
which, as an enthusiastic Sunday sportsman, he was accustomed to use. I
only found his wife at home, as he was away on a holiday tour. Her evident
terror as to what was going to happen provoked me to uncontrollable
laughter. I advised her to lodge her husband’s gun in a place of safety, by
handing it to the committee of the Vaterlands-Verein in return for a receipt,
as it might otherwise soon be requisitioned by the mob. I have since learned
that my eccentric behaviour on this occasion, was afterwards reckoned
against me as a serious crime. I then returned to the streets, to see whether
anything beyond a ringing of bells and a yellowish eclipse of the sun might
be going on in the town, I first made my way to the Old Market-place,
where I noticed a group of men gathered round a vociferous orator. It was
also an agreeable surprise to me to see Schroder-Devrient descending at the
door of a hotel. She had just arrived from Merlin, and was keenly excited
by the news which had reached her, that the populace had already been fired
upon. As she had only recently seen an abortive insurrection crushed by
arms in Berlin, she was indignant to find the same things happening in her
‘peaceful Dresden’ as she termed it.
When she turned to me from the stolid crowd, which had complacently
been listening to her passionate outpourings, she seemed relieved at finding
some one to whom she could appeal to oppose these horrible proceedings
with all his might. I met her on another occasion at the house of my old
friend Heine, where she had taken refuge. When she noticed my
indifference she again adjured me to use every possible effort to prevent the
senseless, suicidal conflict. I heard afterwards that a charge of high treason
on account of sedition had been brought against Schroder-Devrient by
reason of her conduct in regard to this matter. She had to prove her
innocence in a court of law, so as to establish beyond dispute her claim to
the pension which she had been promised by contract for her many years’
service in Dresden as an opera-singer.
On the 3rd of May I betook myself direct to that quarter of the town
where I heard unpleasant rumours of a sanguinary conflict having taken
place. I afterwards learned that the actual cause of the dispute between the
civil and military power had arisen when the watch had been changed in
front of the Arsenal. At that moment the mob, under a bold leader, had
seized the opportunity to take forcible possession of the armoury. A display
Page 433
of military force was made, and the crowd was fired upon by a few cannon
loaded with grape-shot. As I approached the scene of operations through the
Rampische Gasse, I met a company of the Dresden Communal Guards,
who, although they were quite innocent, had apparently been exposed to
this fire. I noticed that one of the citizen guards, leaning heavily on the arm
of a comrade, was trying to hurry along, in spite of the fact that his right leg
seemed to be dragging helplessly behind him. Some of the crowd, seeing
the blood on the pavement behind him, shouted ‘He is bleeding.’ In the
midst of this excitement I suddenly became conscious of the cry raised on
all sides: ‘To the barricades! to the barricades!’ Driven by a mechanical
impulse I followed the stream of people, which moved once more in the
direction of the Town Hall in the Old Market-place. Amid the terrific tumult
I particularly noticed a significant group stretching right across the street,
and striding along the Rosmaringasse. It reminded me, though the simile
was rather exaggerated, of the crowd that had once stood at the doors of the
theatre and demanded free entrance to Rienzi; among them was a
hunchback, who at once suggested Goethe’s Vansen in Egmont, and as the
revolutionary cry rose about his ears, I saw him rub his hands together in
great glee over the long-desired ecstasy of revolt which he had realised at
last.
I recollect quite clearly that from that moment I was attracted by surprise
and interest in the drama, without feeling any desire to join the ranks of the
combatants. However, the agitation caused by my sympathy as a mere
spectator increased with every step I felt impelled to take. I was able to
press right into the rooms of the town council, escaping notice in the
tumultuous crowd, and it seemed to me as if the officials were guilty of
collusion with the mob. I made my way unobserved into the council-
chamber; what I saw there was utter disorder and confusion. When night
fell I wandered slowly through the hastily made barricades, consisting
chiefly of market stalls, back to my house in the distant Friedrichstrasse,
and next morning I again watched these amazing proceedings with
sympathetic interest.
On Thursday, 4th May, I could see that the Town Hall was gradually
becoming the undoubted centre of the revolution. That section of the people
who had hoped for a peaceful understanding with the monarch was thrown
into the utmost consternation by the news that the King and his whole court,
acting on the advice of his minister Beust, had left the palace, and had gone
loaded with grape-shot. As I approached the scene of operations through the
Rampische Gasse, I met a company of the Dresden Communal Guards,
who, although they were quite innocent, had apparently been exposed to
this fire. I noticed that one of the citizen guards, leaning heavily on the arm
of a comrade, was trying to hurry along, in spite of the fact that his right leg
seemed to be dragging helplessly behind him. Some of the crowd, seeing
the blood on the pavement behind him, shouted ‘He is bleeding.’ In the
midst of this excitement I suddenly became conscious of the cry raised on
all sides: ‘To the barricades! to the barricades!’ Driven by a mechanical
impulse I followed the stream of people, which moved once more in the
direction of the Town Hall in the Old Market-place. Amid the terrific tumult
I particularly noticed a significant group stretching right across the street,
and striding along the Rosmaringasse. It reminded me, though the simile
was rather exaggerated, of the crowd that had once stood at the doors of the
theatre and demanded free entrance to Rienzi; among them was a
hunchback, who at once suggested Goethe’s Vansen in Egmont, and as the
revolutionary cry rose about his ears, I saw him rub his hands together in
great glee over the long-desired ecstasy of revolt which he had realised at
last.
I recollect quite clearly that from that moment I was attracted by surprise
and interest in the drama, without feeling any desire to join the ranks of the
combatants. However, the agitation caused by my sympathy as a mere
spectator increased with every step I felt impelled to take. I was able to
press right into the rooms of the town council, escaping notice in the
tumultuous crowd, and it seemed to me as if the officials were guilty of
collusion with the mob. I made my way unobserved into the council-
chamber; what I saw there was utter disorder and confusion. When night
fell I wandered slowly through the hastily made barricades, consisting
chiefly of market stalls, back to my house in the distant Friedrichstrasse,
and next morning I again watched these amazing proceedings with
sympathetic interest.
On Thursday, 4th May, I could see that the Town Hall was gradually
becoming the undoubted centre of the revolution. That section of the people
who had hoped for a peaceful understanding with the monarch was thrown
into the utmost consternation by the news that the King and his whole court,
acting on the advice of his minister Beust, had left the palace, and had gone
Page 434
by ship down the Elbe to the fortress of Konigstein. In those circumstances
the town council saw they were no longer able to face the situation, and
thereupon took part in summoning those members of the Saxon Chamber
who were still in Dresden. These latter now assembled in the Town Hall to
decide what steps should be taken for the protection of the state. A
deputation was sent to the ministry, but returned with the report that they
were nowhere to be found. At the same moment news arrived from all sides
that, in accordance with a previous compact, the King of Prussia’s troops
would advance to occupy Dresden. A general outcry immediately arose for
measures to be adopted to prevent this incursion of foreign troops.
Simultaneously with this, came the intelligence of the national uprising in
Wurtemberg, where the troops themselves had frustrated the intentions of
the government by their declaration of fidelity to the parliament, and the
ministry had been compelled against their will to acknowledge the Pan-
German Constitution. The opinion of our politicians, who were assembled
in consultation, was that the matter might still be settled by peaceful means,
if it were possible to induce the Saxon troops to take up a similar attitude,
as by this means the King would at least be placed under the wholesome
necessity of offering patriotic resistance to the Prussian occupation of his
country.
Everything seemed to depend on making the Saxon battalions in Dresden
understand the paramount importance of their action. As this seemed to me
the only hope of an honourable peace in this senseless chaos, I confess that,
on this one occasion, I did allow myself to be led astray so far as to organise
a demonstration which, however, proved futile.
I induced the printer of Röckel’s Volksblatt, which was for the moment at
a standstill, to employ all the type he would have used for his next number,
in printing in huge characters on strips of paper the words: Seid Ihr mit uns
gegen fremde Truppen? (‘Are you on our side against the foreign troops?’).
Placards bearing these words were fixed on those barricades which it was
thought would be the first to be assaulted, and were intended to bring the
Saxon troops to a halt if they were commanded to attack the revolutionaries.
Of course no one took any notice of these placards except intending
informers. On that day nothing but confused negotiations and wild
excitement took place which threw no light on the situation. The Old Town
of Dresden, with its barricades, was an interesting enough sight for the
the town council saw they were no longer able to face the situation, and
thereupon took part in summoning those members of the Saxon Chamber
who were still in Dresden. These latter now assembled in the Town Hall to
decide what steps should be taken for the protection of the state. A
deputation was sent to the ministry, but returned with the report that they
were nowhere to be found. At the same moment news arrived from all sides
that, in accordance with a previous compact, the King of Prussia’s troops
would advance to occupy Dresden. A general outcry immediately arose for
measures to be adopted to prevent this incursion of foreign troops.
Simultaneously with this, came the intelligence of the national uprising in
Wurtemberg, where the troops themselves had frustrated the intentions of
the government by their declaration of fidelity to the parliament, and the
ministry had been compelled against their will to acknowledge the Pan-
German Constitution. The opinion of our politicians, who were assembled
in consultation, was that the matter might still be settled by peaceful means,
if it were possible to induce the Saxon troops to take up a similar attitude,
as by this means the King would at least be placed under the wholesome
necessity of offering patriotic resistance to the Prussian occupation of his
country.
Everything seemed to depend on making the Saxon battalions in Dresden
understand the paramount importance of their action. As this seemed to me
the only hope of an honourable peace in this senseless chaos, I confess that,
on this one occasion, I did allow myself to be led astray so far as to organise
a demonstration which, however, proved futile.
I induced the printer of Röckel’s Volksblatt, which was for the moment at
a standstill, to employ all the type he would have used for his next number,
in printing in huge characters on strips of paper the words: Seid Ihr mit uns
gegen fremde Truppen? (‘Are you on our side against the foreign troops?’).
Placards bearing these words were fixed on those barricades which it was
thought would be the first to be assaulted, and were intended to bring the
Saxon troops to a halt if they were commanded to attack the revolutionaries.
Of course no one took any notice of these placards except intending
informers. On that day nothing but confused negotiations and wild
excitement took place which threw no light on the situation. The Old Town
of Dresden, with its barricades, was an interesting enough sight for the
Page 435
spectators. I looked on with amazement and disgust, but my attention was
suddenly distracted by seeing Bakunin emerge from his hiding-place and
wander among the barricades in a black frockcoat. But I was very much
mistaken in thinking he would be pleased with what he saw; he recognised
the childish inefficiency of all the measures that had been taken for defence,
and declared that the only satisfaction he could feel in the state of affairs
was that he need not trouble about the police, but could calmly consider the
question of going elsewhere, as he found no inducement to take part in an
insurrection conducted in such a slovenly fashion. While he walked about,
smoking his cigar, and making fun of the naivete of the Dresden revolution,
I watched the Communal Guards assembling under arms in front of the
Town Hall at the summons of their commandant. From the ranks of its most
popular corps, the Schützen-Compagnie, I was accosted by Rietschel, who
was most anxious about the nature of the rising, and also by Semper.
Rietschel, who seemed to think I was better informed of the facts than he
was, assured me that he felt his position was a very difficult one. He said
the select company to which he belonged was very democratic, and as his
professorship at the Fine Arts Academy placed him in a peculiar position,
he did not know how to reconcile the sentiments he shared with his
company with his duty as a citizen. The word ‘citizen’ amused me; I
glanced sharply at Semper and repeated the word ‘citizen.’ Semper
responded with a peculiar smile, and turned away without further comment.
The next day (Friday the 5th of May), when I again took my place as a
passionately interested spectator of the proceedings at the Town Hall,
events took a decisive turn. The remnant of the leaders of the Saxon people
there assembled thought it advisable to constitute themselves into a
provisional government, as there was no Saxon government in existence
with which negotiations could be conducted. Professor Kochly, who was an
eloquent speaker, was chosen to proclaim the new administration. He
performed this solemn ceremony from the balcony of the Town Hall, facing
the faithful remnant of the Communal Guards and the not very numerous
crowd. At the same time the legal existence of the Pan-German Constitution
was proclaimed, and allegiance to it was sworn by the armed forces of the
nation. I recollect that these proceedings did not seem to me imposing, and
Bakunin’s reiterated opinion about their triviality gradually became more
comprehensible. Even from a technical point of view these reflections were
justified when, to my great amusement and surprise, Semper, in the full
suddenly distracted by seeing Bakunin emerge from his hiding-place and
wander among the barricades in a black frockcoat. But I was very much
mistaken in thinking he would be pleased with what he saw; he recognised
the childish inefficiency of all the measures that had been taken for defence,
and declared that the only satisfaction he could feel in the state of affairs
was that he need not trouble about the police, but could calmly consider the
question of going elsewhere, as he found no inducement to take part in an
insurrection conducted in such a slovenly fashion. While he walked about,
smoking his cigar, and making fun of the naivete of the Dresden revolution,
I watched the Communal Guards assembling under arms in front of the
Town Hall at the summons of their commandant. From the ranks of its most
popular corps, the Schützen-Compagnie, I was accosted by Rietschel, who
was most anxious about the nature of the rising, and also by Semper.
Rietschel, who seemed to think I was better informed of the facts than he
was, assured me that he felt his position was a very difficult one. He said
the select company to which he belonged was very democratic, and as his
professorship at the Fine Arts Academy placed him in a peculiar position,
he did not know how to reconcile the sentiments he shared with his
company with his duty as a citizen. The word ‘citizen’ amused me; I
glanced sharply at Semper and repeated the word ‘citizen.’ Semper
responded with a peculiar smile, and turned away without further comment.
The next day (Friday the 5th of May), when I again took my place as a
passionately interested spectator of the proceedings at the Town Hall,
events took a decisive turn. The remnant of the leaders of the Saxon people
there assembled thought it advisable to constitute themselves into a
provisional government, as there was no Saxon government in existence
with which negotiations could be conducted. Professor Kochly, who was an
eloquent speaker, was chosen to proclaim the new administration. He
performed this solemn ceremony from the balcony of the Town Hall, facing
the faithful remnant of the Communal Guards and the not very numerous
crowd. At the same time the legal existence of the Pan-German Constitution
was proclaimed, and allegiance to it was sworn by the armed forces of the
nation. I recollect that these proceedings did not seem to me imposing, and
Bakunin’s reiterated opinion about their triviality gradually became more
comprehensible. Even from a technical point of view these reflections were
justified when, to my great amusement and surprise, Semper, in the full
Page 436
uniform of a citizen guard, with a hat bedecked with the national colours,
asked for me at the Town Hall, and informed me of the extremely faulty
construction of the barricades in the Wild Strufergasse and the neighbouring
Brudergasse. To pacify his artistic conscience as an engineer I directed him
to the office of the ‘Military Commission for the Defence.’ He followed my
advice with conscientious satisfaction; possibly he obtained the necessary
authorisation to give instructions for the building of suitable works of
defence at that neglected point. After that I never saw him again in Dresden;
but I presume that he carried out the strategic works entrusted to him by
that committee with all the conscientiousness of a Michael Angelo or a
Leonardo da Vinci.
The rest of the day passed in continuous negotiations over the truce
which, by arrangement with the Saxon troops, was to last until noon of the
next day. In this business I noticed the very pronounced activity of a former
college friend, Marschall von Bieberstein, a lawyer who, in his capacity as
senior officer of the Dresden Communal Guard, distinguished himself by
his boundless zeal amid the shouts of a mighty band of fellow-orators. On
that day a certain Heinz, formerly a Greek colonel, was placed in command
of the armed forces. These proceedings did not seem at all satisfactory to
Bakunin, who put in an occasional appearance. While the provisional
government placed all its hopes on finding a peaceful settlement of the
conflict by moral persuasion, he, on the contrary, with his clear vision
foresaw a well-planned military attack by the Prussians, and thought it
could only be met by good strategic measures. He therefore urgently
pressed for the acquisition of some experienced Polish officers who
happened to be in Dresden, as the Saxon revolutionaries appeared to be
absolutely lacking in military tactics. Everybody was afraid to take this
course; on the other hand, great expectations were entertained from
negotiations with the Frankfort States Assembly, which was on its last legs.
Everything was to be done as far as possible in legal form. The time passed
pleasantly enough. Elegant ladies with their cavaliers promenaded the
barricaded streets during those beautiful spring evenings. It seemed to be
little more than an entertaining drama. The unaccustomed aspect of things
even afforded me genuine pleasure, combined with a feeling that the whole
thing was not quite serious, and that a friendly proclamation from the
government would put an end to it. So I strolled comfortably home through
asked for me at the Town Hall, and informed me of the extremely faulty
construction of the barricades in the Wild Strufergasse and the neighbouring
Brudergasse. To pacify his artistic conscience as an engineer I directed him
to the office of the ‘Military Commission for the Defence.’ He followed my
advice with conscientious satisfaction; possibly he obtained the necessary
authorisation to give instructions for the building of suitable works of
defence at that neglected point. After that I never saw him again in Dresden;
but I presume that he carried out the strategic works entrusted to him by
that committee with all the conscientiousness of a Michael Angelo or a
Leonardo da Vinci.
The rest of the day passed in continuous negotiations over the truce
which, by arrangement with the Saxon troops, was to last until noon of the
next day. In this business I noticed the very pronounced activity of a former
college friend, Marschall von Bieberstein, a lawyer who, in his capacity as
senior officer of the Dresden Communal Guard, distinguished himself by
his boundless zeal amid the shouts of a mighty band of fellow-orators. On
that day a certain Heinz, formerly a Greek colonel, was placed in command
of the armed forces. These proceedings did not seem at all satisfactory to
Bakunin, who put in an occasional appearance. While the provisional
government placed all its hopes on finding a peaceful settlement of the
conflict by moral persuasion, he, on the contrary, with his clear vision
foresaw a well-planned military attack by the Prussians, and thought it
could only be met by good strategic measures. He therefore urgently
pressed for the acquisition of some experienced Polish officers who
happened to be in Dresden, as the Saxon revolutionaries appeared to be
absolutely lacking in military tactics. Everybody was afraid to take this
course; on the other hand, great expectations were entertained from
negotiations with the Frankfort States Assembly, which was on its last legs.
Everything was to be done as far as possible in legal form. The time passed
pleasantly enough. Elegant ladies with their cavaliers promenaded the
barricaded streets during those beautiful spring evenings. It seemed to be
little more than an entertaining drama. The unaccustomed aspect of things
even afforded me genuine pleasure, combined with a feeling that the whole
thing was not quite serious, and that a friendly proclamation from the
government would put an end to it. So I strolled comfortably home through
Page 437
the numerous barricades at a late hour, thinking as I went of the material for
a drama, Achilleus, with which I had been occupied for some time.
At home I found my two nieces, Clara and Ottilie Brockhaus, the
daughters of my sister Louisa. They had been living for a year with a
governess in Dresden, and their weekly visits and contagious good spirits
delighted me. Every one was in a high state of glee about the revolution;
they all heartily approved of the barricades, and felt no scruples about
desiring victory for their defenders. Protected by the truce, this state of
mind remained undisturbed the whole of Friday (5th May). From all parts
came news which led us to believe in a universal uprising throughout
Germany. Baden and the Palatinate were in the throes of a revolt on behalf
of the whole of Germany. Similar rumours came in from free towns like
Breslau. In Leipzig, volunteer student corps had mustered contingents for
Dresden, which arrived amid the exultation of the populace. A fully
equipped defence department was organised at the Town Hall, and young
Heine, disappointed like myself in his hopes of the performance of
Lohengrin, had also joined this body. Vigorous promises of support came
from the Saxon Erzgebirge, as well as announcements that armed
contingents were forthcoming. Every one thought, therefore, that if only the
Old Town were kept well barricaded, it could safely defy the threat of
foreign occupation. Early on Saturday, 6th May, it was obvious that the
situation was becoming more serious. Prussian troops had marched into the
New Town, and the Saxon troops, which it had not been considered
advisable to use for an attack, were kept loyal to the flag. The truce expired
at noon, and the troops, supported by several guns, at once opened the
attack on one, of the principal positions held by the people on the
Neumarkt.
So far I had entertained no other conviction than that the matter would be
decided in the most summary fashion as soon as it came to an actual
conflict, for there was no evidence in the state of my own feelings (or,
indeed, in what I was able to gather independently of them) of that
passionate seriousness of purpose, without which tests as severe as this
have never been successfully withstood. It was irritating to me, while I
heard the sharp rattle of fire, to be unable to gather anything of what was
going on, and I thought by climbing the Kreuz tower I might get a good
view. Even from this elevation I could not see anything clearly, but I
gathered enough to satisfy myself that after an hour of heavy firing the
a drama, Achilleus, with which I had been occupied for some time.
At home I found my two nieces, Clara and Ottilie Brockhaus, the
daughters of my sister Louisa. They had been living for a year with a
governess in Dresden, and their weekly visits and contagious good spirits
delighted me. Every one was in a high state of glee about the revolution;
they all heartily approved of the barricades, and felt no scruples about
desiring victory for their defenders. Protected by the truce, this state of
mind remained undisturbed the whole of Friday (5th May). From all parts
came news which led us to believe in a universal uprising throughout
Germany. Baden and the Palatinate were in the throes of a revolt on behalf
of the whole of Germany. Similar rumours came in from free towns like
Breslau. In Leipzig, volunteer student corps had mustered contingents for
Dresden, which arrived amid the exultation of the populace. A fully
equipped defence department was organised at the Town Hall, and young
Heine, disappointed like myself in his hopes of the performance of
Lohengrin, had also joined this body. Vigorous promises of support came
from the Saxon Erzgebirge, as well as announcements that armed
contingents were forthcoming. Every one thought, therefore, that if only the
Old Town were kept well barricaded, it could safely defy the threat of
foreign occupation. Early on Saturday, 6th May, it was obvious that the
situation was becoming more serious. Prussian troops had marched into the
New Town, and the Saxon troops, which it had not been considered
advisable to use for an attack, were kept loyal to the flag. The truce expired
at noon, and the troops, supported by several guns, at once opened the
attack on one, of the principal positions held by the people on the
Neumarkt.
So far I had entertained no other conviction than that the matter would be
decided in the most summary fashion as soon as it came to an actual
conflict, for there was no evidence in the state of my own feelings (or,
indeed, in what I was able to gather independently of them) of that
passionate seriousness of purpose, without which tests as severe as this
have never been successfully withstood. It was irritating to me, while I
heard the sharp rattle of fire, to be unable to gather anything of what was
going on, and I thought by climbing the Kreuz tower I might get a good
view. Even from this elevation I could not see anything clearly, but I
gathered enough to satisfy myself that after an hour of heavy firing the
Page 438
advance artillery of the Prussian troops had retired, and had at last been
completely silenced, their withdrawal being signalled by a loud shout of
jubilation from the populace. Apparently the first attack had exhausted
itself; and now my interest in what was going on began to assume a more
and more vivid hue. To obtain information in greater detail I hurried back to
the Town Hall. I could extract nothing, however, from the boundless
confusion which I met, until at last I came upon Bakunin in the midst of the
main group of speakers. He was able to give me an extraordinarily accurate
account of what had happened. Information had reached headquarters from
a barricade in the Neumarkt where the attack was most serious, that
everything had been in a state of confusion there before the onslaught of the
troops; thereupon my friend Marschall von Bieberstein, together with Leo
von Zichlinsky, who were officers in the citizen corps, had called up some
volunteers and conducted them to the place of danger. Kreis-Amtmann
Heubner of Freiberg, without a weapon to defend himself, and with bared
head, jumped immediately on to the top of the barricade, which had just
been abandoned by all its defenders. He was the sole member of the
provisional government to remain on the spot, the leaders, Todt and
Tschirner, having disappeared at the first sign of a panic. Heubner turned
round to exhort the volunteers to advance, addressing them in stirring
words. His success was complete, the barricade was taken again, and a fire,
as unexpected as it was fierce, was directed upon the troops, which, as I
myself saw, were forced to retire. Bakunin had been in close touch with this
action, he had followed the volunteers, and he now explained to me that
however narrow might be the political views of Heubner (he belonged to
the moderate Left of the Saxon Chamber), he was a man of noble character,
at whose service he had immediately placed his own life.
Bakunin had only needed this example to determine his own line of
conduct; he had decided to risk his neck in the attempt and to ask no further
questions. Heubner too was now bound to recognise the necessity for
extreme measures, and no longer recoiled from any proposal on the part of
Bakunin which was directed to this end. The military advice of experienced
Polish officers was brought to bear on the commandant, whose incapacity
had not been slow to reveal itself; Bakunin, who openly confessed that he
understood nothing of pure strategy, never moved from the Town Hall, but
remained at Heubner’s side, giving advice and information in every
direction with wonderful sangfroid. For the rest of the day the battle
completely silenced, their withdrawal being signalled by a loud shout of
jubilation from the populace. Apparently the first attack had exhausted
itself; and now my interest in what was going on began to assume a more
and more vivid hue. To obtain information in greater detail I hurried back to
the Town Hall. I could extract nothing, however, from the boundless
confusion which I met, until at last I came upon Bakunin in the midst of the
main group of speakers. He was able to give me an extraordinarily accurate
account of what had happened. Information had reached headquarters from
a barricade in the Neumarkt where the attack was most serious, that
everything had been in a state of confusion there before the onslaught of the
troops; thereupon my friend Marschall von Bieberstein, together with Leo
von Zichlinsky, who were officers in the citizen corps, had called up some
volunteers and conducted them to the place of danger. Kreis-Amtmann
Heubner of Freiberg, without a weapon to defend himself, and with bared
head, jumped immediately on to the top of the barricade, which had just
been abandoned by all its defenders. He was the sole member of the
provisional government to remain on the spot, the leaders, Todt and
Tschirner, having disappeared at the first sign of a panic. Heubner turned
round to exhort the volunteers to advance, addressing them in stirring
words. His success was complete, the barricade was taken again, and a fire,
as unexpected as it was fierce, was directed upon the troops, which, as I
myself saw, were forced to retire. Bakunin had been in close touch with this
action, he had followed the volunteers, and he now explained to me that
however narrow might be the political views of Heubner (he belonged to
the moderate Left of the Saxon Chamber), he was a man of noble character,
at whose service he had immediately placed his own life.
Bakunin had only needed this example to determine his own line of
conduct; he had decided to risk his neck in the attempt and to ask no further
questions. Heubner too was now bound to recognise the necessity for
extreme measures, and no longer recoiled from any proposal on the part of
Bakunin which was directed to this end. The military advice of experienced
Polish officers was brought to bear on the commandant, whose incapacity
had not been slow to reveal itself; Bakunin, who openly confessed that he
understood nothing of pure strategy, never moved from the Town Hall, but
remained at Heubner’s side, giving advice and information in every
direction with wonderful sangfroid. For the rest of the day the battle
Page 439
confined itself to skirmishes by sharpshooters from the various positions. I
was itching to climb the Kreuz tower again, so as to get the widest possible
survey over the whole field of action. In order to reach this tower from the
Town Hall, one had to pass through a space which was under a cross-fire of
rifle-shots from the troops posted in the royal palace. At a moment when
this square was quite deserted, I yielded to my daring impulse, and crossed
it on my way to the Kreuz tower at a slow pace, remembering that in such
circumstances the young soldier is advised never to hurry, because by so
doing he may draw the shot upon himself. On reaching this post of vantage
I found several people who had gathered there, some of them driven by a
curiosity like my own, others in obedience to an order from the
headquarters of the revolutionaries to reconnoitre the enemy’s movements.
Amongst them I made the acquaintance of a schoolmaster called Berthold, a
man of quiet and gentle disposition, but full of conviction and
determination. I lost myself in an earnest philosophical discussion with him
which extended to the widest spheres of religion. At the same time he
showed a homely anxiety to protect us from the cone-shaped bullets of the
Prussian sharpshooters by placing us ingeniously behind a barricade
consisting of one of the straw mattresses which he had cajoled out of the
warder. The Prussian sharpshooters were posted on the distant tower of the
Frauenkirche, and had chosen the height occupied by us as their target. At
nightfall I found it impossible to make up my mind to go home and leave
my interesting place of refuge, so I persuaded the warder to send a
subordinate to Friedrichstadt with a few lines to my wife, and with
instructions to ask her to let me have some necessary provisions. Thus I
spent one of the most extraordinary nights of my life, taking turns with
Berthold to keep watch and sleep, close beneath the great bell with its
terrible groaning clang, and with the accompaniment of the continuous
rattle of the Prussian shot as it beat against the tower walls.
Sunday (the 7th of May) was one of the most beautiful days in the year. I
was awakened by the song of a nightingale, which rose to our ears from the
Schütze garden close by. A sacred calm and peacefulness lay over the town
and the wide suburbs of Dresden, which were visible from my point of
vantage. Towards sunrise a mist settled upon the outskirts, and suddenly
through its folds we could hear the music of the Marseillaise making its
way clearly and distinctly from the district of the Tharanderstrasse. As the
sound drew nearer and nearer, the mist dispersed, and the glow of the rising
was itching to climb the Kreuz tower again, so as to get the widest possible
survey over the whole field of action. In order to reach this tower from the
Town Hall, one had to pass through a space which was under a cross-fire of
rifle-shots from the troops posted in the royal palace. At a moment when
this square was quite deserted, I yielded to my daring impulse, and crossed
it on my way to the Kreuz tower at a slow pace, remembering that in such
circumstances the young soldier is advised never to hurry, because by so
doing he may draw the shot upon himself. On reaching this post of vantage
I found several people who had gathered there, some of them driven by a
curiosity like my own, others in obedience to an order from the
headquarters of the revolutionaries to reconnoitre the enemy’s movements.
Amongst them I made the acquaintance of a schoolmaster called Berthold, a
man of quiet and gentle disposition, but full of conviction and
determination. I lost myself in an earnest philosophical discussion with him
which extended to the widest spheres of religion. At the same time he
showed a homely anxiety to protect us from the cone-shaped bullets of the
Prussian sharpshooters by placing us ingeniously behind a barricade
consisting of one of the straw mattresses which he had cajoled out of the
warder. The Prussian sharpshooters were posted on the distant tower of the
Frauenkirche, and had chosen the height occupied by us as their target. At
nightfall I found it impossible to make up my mind to go home and leave
my interesting place of refuge, so I persuaded the warder to send a
subordinate to Friedrichstadt with a few lines to my wife, and with
instructions to ask her to let me have some necessary provisions. Thus I
spent one of the most extraordinary nights of my life, taking turns with
Berthold to keep watch and sleep, close beneath the great bell with its
terrible groaning clang, and with the accompaniment of the continuous
rattle of the Prussian shot as it beat against the tower walls.
Sunday (the 7th of May) was one of the most beautiful days in the year. I
was awakened by the song of a nightingale, which rose to our ears from the
Schütze garden close by. A sacred calm and peacefulness lay over the town
and the wide suburbs of Dresden, which were visible from my point of
vantage. Towards sunrise a mist settled upon the outskirts, and suddenly
through its folds we could hear the music of the Marseillaise making its
way clearly and distinctly from the district of the Tharanderstrasse. As the
sound drew nearer and nearer, the mist dispersed, and the glow of the rising
Page 440
sun spread a glittering light upon the weapons of a long column which was
winding its way towards the town. It was impossible not to feel deeply
impressed at the sight of this continuous procession. Suddenly a perception
of that element which I had so long missed in the German people was borne
in upon me in all its essential freshness and vital colour. The fact that until
this moment I had been obliged to resign myself to its absence, had
contributed not a little to the feelings by which I had been swayed. Here I
beheld some thousand men from the Erzgebirge, mostly miners, well armed
and organised, who had rallied to the defence of Dresden. Soon we saw
them march up the Altmarkt opposite the Town Hall, and after receiving a
joyful welcome, bivouac there to recover from their journey.
Reinforcements continued to pour in the whole day long, and the heroic
achievement of the previous day now received its reward in the shape of a
universal elevation of spirits. A change seemed to have been made in the
plan of attack by the Prussian troops. This could be gathered from the fact
that numerous simultaneous attacks, but of a less concentrated type, were
made upon various positions. The troops which had come to reinforce us
brought with them four small cannon, the property of a certain Herr Thade
von Burgk, whose acquaintance I had made before on the occasion of the
anniversary of the founding of the Dresden Choral Society, when he had
made a speech which was well intentioned but wearisome to the point of
being ludicrous. The recollection of this speech returned to me with peculiar
irony, now that his cannon were being fired from the barricade upon the
enemy. I felt a still deeper impression, however, when, towards eleven
o’clock, I saw the old Opera House, in which a few weeks ago I had
conducted the last performance of the Ninth Symphony, burst into flames.
As I have had occasion to mention before, the danger from fire to which
this building was exposed, full as it was with wood and all kind of textile
fabric, and originally built only for a temporary purpose, had always been a
subject of terror and apprehension to those who visited it.
I was told that the Opera House had been set alight on strategical
grounds, in order to face a dangerous attack on this exposed side, and also
to protect the famous ‘Semper’ barricade from an overpowering surprise.
From this I concluded that reasons of this kind act as far more powerful
motives in the world than aesthetic considerations. For a long time men of
taste had vainly cried aloud for abolition of this ugly building which was
such an eyesore by the side of the elegant proportions of the Zwinger
winding its way towards the town. It was impossible not to feel deeply
impressed at the sight of this continuous procession. Suddenly a perception
of that element which I had so long missed in the German people was borne
in upon me in all its essential freshness and vital colour. The fact that until
this moment I had been obliged to resign myself to its absence, had
contributed not a little to the feelings by which I had been swayed. Here I
beheld some thousand men from the Erzgebirge, mostly miners, well armed
and organised, who had rallied to the defence of Dresden. Soon we saw
them march up the Altmarkt opposite the Town Hall, and after receiving a
joyful welcome, bivouac there to recover from their journey.
Reinforcements continued to pour in the whole day long, and the heroic
achievement of the previous day now received its reward in the shape of a
universal elevation of spirits. A change seemed to have been made in the
plan of attack by the Prussian troops. This could be gathered from the fact
that numerous simultaneous attacks, but of a less concentrated type, were
made upon various positions. The troops which had come to reinforce us
brought with them four small cannon, the property of a certain Herr Thade
von Burgk, whose acquaintance I had made before on the occasion of the
anniversary of the founding of the Dresden Choral Society, when he had
made a speech which was well intentioned but wearisome to the point of
being ludicrous. The recollection of this speech returned to me with peculiar
irony, now that his cannon were being fired from the barricade upon the
enemy. I felt a still deeper impression, however, when, towards eleven
o’clock, I saw the old Opera House, in which a few weeks ago I had
conducted the last performance of the Ninth Symphony, burst into flames.
As I have had occasion to mention before, the danger from fire to which
this building was exposed, full as it was with wood and all kind of textile
fabric, and originally built only for a temporary purpose, had always been a
subject of terror and apprehension to those who visited it.
I was told that the Opera House had been set alight on strategical
grounds, in order to face a dangerous attack on this exposed side, and also
to protect the famous ‘Semper’ barricade from an overpowering surprise.
From this I concluded that reasons of this kind act as far more powerful
motives in the world than aesthetic considerations. For a long time men of
taste had vainly cried aloud for abolition of this ugly building which was
such an eyesore by the side of the elegant proportions of the Zwinger
Page 441
Gallery in its neighbourhood. In a few moments the Opera House (which as
regards size was, it is true, an imposing edifice), together with its highly
inflammable contents, was a vast sea of flames. When this reached the
metal roofs of the neighbouring wings of the Zwinger, and enveloped them
in wonderful bluish waves of fire, the first expression of regret made itself
audible amongst the spectators. What a disaster! Some thought that the
Natural History collection was in danger; others maintained that it was the
Armoury, upon which a citizen soldier retorted that if such were the case, it
would be a very good job if the ‘stuffed noblemen’ were burnt to cinders.
But it appeared that a keen sense of the value of art knew how to curb the
fire’s lust for further dominion, and, as a matter of fact, it did but little
damage in that quarter. Finally our post of observation, which until now had
remained comparatively quiet, was filled itself with swarms and swarms of
armed men, who had been ordered thither to defend the approach from the
church to the Altmarkt, upon which an attack was feared from the side of
the ill-secured Kreuzgasse. Unarmed men were now in the way; moreover, I
had received a message from my wife summoning me home after the long
and terrible anxiety she had suffered.
At last, after meeting with innumerable obstacles and overcoming a host
of difficulties, I succeeded, by means of all sorts of circuitous routes, in
reaching my remote suburb, from which I was cut off by the fortified
portions of the town, and especially by a cannonade directed from the
Zwinger. My lodgings were full to overflowing with excited women who
had collected round Minna; among them the panic-stricken wife of Röckel,
who suspected her husband of being in the very thick of the fight, as she
thought that on the receipt of the news that Dresden had risen he would
probably have returned. As a matter of fact, I had heard a rumour that
Röckel had arrived on this very day, but as yet I had not obtained a glimpse
of him. My young nieces helped once more to raise my spirits. The firing
had put them into a high state of glee, which to some extent infected my
wife, as soon as she was reassured as to my personal safety. All of them
were furious with the sculptor Hänel, who had never ceased insisting upon
the expedience of bolting the house to prevent an entry of the
revolutionaries. All the women without exception were joking about his
abject terror at the sight of some men armed with scythes who had appeared
in the street In this way Sunday passed like a sort of family jollification.
regards size was, it is true, an imposing edifice), together with its highly
inflammable contents, was a vast sea of flames. When this reached the
metal roofs of the neighbouring wings of the Zwinger, and enveloped them
in wonderful bluish waves of fire, the first expression of regret made itself
audible amongst the spectators. What a disaster! Some thought that the
Natural History collection was in danger; others maintained that it was the
Armoury, upon which a citizen soldier retorted that if such were the case, it
would be a very good job if the ‘stuffed noblemen’ were burnt to cinders.
But it appeared that a keen sense of the value of art knew how to curb the
fire’s lust for further dominion, and, as a matter of fact, it did but little
damage in that quarter. Finally our post of observation, which until now had
remained comparatively quiet, was filled itself with swarms and swarms of
armed men, who had been ordered thither to defend the approach from the
church to the Altmarkt, upon which an attack was feared from the side of
the ill-secured Kreuzgasse. Unarmed men were now in the way; moreover, I
had received a message from my wife summoning me home after the long
and terrible anxiety she had suffered.
At last, after meeting with innumerable obstacles and overcoming a host
of difficulties, I succeeded, by means of all sorts of circuitous routes, in
reaching my remote suburb, from which I was cut off by the fortified
portions of the town, and especially by a cannonade directed from the
Zwinger. My lodgings were full to overflowing with excited women who
had collected round Minna; among them the panic-stricken wife of Röckel,
who suspected her husband of being in the very thick of the fight, as she
thought that on the receipt of the news that Dresden had risen he would
probably have returned. As a matter of fact, I had heard a rumour that
Röckel had arrived on this very day, but as yet I had not obtained a glimpse
of him. My young nieces helped once more to raise my spirits. The firing
had put them into a high state of glee, which to some extent infected my
wife, as soon as she was reassured as to my personal safety. All of them
were furious with the sculptor Hänel, who had never ceased insisting upon
the expedience of bolting the house to prevent an entry of the
revolutionaries. All the women without exception were joking about his
abject terror at the sight of some men armed with scythes who had appeared
in the street In this way Sunday passed like a sort of family jollification.
Page 442
On the following morning (Monday, 8th May) I tried again to get
information as to the state of affairs by forcing my way to the Town Hall
from my house, which was cut off from the place of action. As in the course
of my journey I was making my way over a barricade near St. Ann’s
Church, one of the Communal Guard shouted out to me, ‘Hullo, conductor,
your der Freude schöner Götterfunken[15] has indeed set fire to things. The
rotten building is rased to the ground.’ Obviously the man was an
enthusiastic member of the audience at my last performance of the Ninth
Symphony. Coming upon me so unexpectedly, this pathetic greeting filled
me with a curious sense of strength and freedom. A little further on, in a
lonely alley in the suburb of Plauen, I fell in with the musician Hiebendahl,
the first oboist in the royal orchestra, and a man who still enjoyed a very
high reputation; he was in the uniform of the Communal Guards, but carried
no gun, and was chatting with a citizen in a similar costume. As soon as he
saw me, he felt he must immediately make an appeal to me to use my
influence against Röckel, who, accompanied by ordnance officers of the
revolutionary party, was instituting a search for guns in this quarter. As soon
as he realised that I was making sympathetic inquiries about Röckel, he
drew back frightened, and said to me in tones of the deepest anxiety: ‘But,
conductor, have you no thought for your position, and what you may lose
by exposing yourself in this fashion?’ This remark had the most drastic
effect upon me; I burst into a loud laugh, and told him that my position was
not worth a thought one way or the other. This indeed was the expression of
my real feelings, which had long been suppressed, and now broke out into
almost jubilant utterance. At that moment I caught sight of Röckel, with two
men of the citizen army who were carrying some guns, making his way
towards me. He gave me a most friendly greeting, but turned at once to
Hiebendahl and his companion and asked him why he was idling about here
in uniform instead of being at his post. When Hiebendahl made the excuse
that his gun had been requisitioned, Röckel cried out to him, ‘You’re a fine
lot of fellows!’ and went away laughing. He gave me a brief account as we
proceeded of what had happened to him since I had lost sight of him, and
thus spared me the obligation of giving him a report of his Volksblatt. We
were interrupted by an imposing troop of well-armed young students of the
gymnasium who had just entered the city and wished to have a safe conduct
to their place of muster. The sight of these serried ranks of youthful figures,
numbering several hundreds, who were stepping bravely to their duty, did
information as to the state of affairs by forcing my way to the Town Hall
from my house, which was cut off from the place of action. As in the course
of my journey I was making my way over a barricade near St. Ann’s
Church, one of the Communal Guard shouted out to me, ‘Hullo, conductor,
your der Freude schöner Götterfunken[15] has indeed set fire to things. The
rotten building is rased to the ground.’ Obviously the man was an
enthusiastic member of the audience at my last performance of the Ninth
Symphony. Coming upon me so unexpectedly, this pathetic greeting filled
me with a curious sense of strength and freedom. A little further on, in a
lonely alley in the suburb of Plauen, I fell in with the musician Hiebendahl,
the first oboist in the royal orchestra, and a man who still enjoyed a very
high reputation; he was in the uniform of the Communal Guards, but carried
no gun, and was chatting with a citizen in a similar costume. As soon as he
saw me, he felt he must immediately make an appeal to me to use my
influence against Röckel, who, accompanied by ordnance officers of the
revolutionary party, was instituting a search for guns in this quarter. As soon
as he realised that I was making sympathetic inquiries about Röckel, he
drew back frightened, and said to me in tones of the deepest anxiety: ‘But,
conductor, have you no thought for your position, and what you may lose
by exposing yourself in this fashion?’ This remark had the most drastic
effect upon me; I burst into a loud laugh, and told him that my position was
not worth a thought one way or the other. This indeed was the expression of
my real feelings, which had long been suppressed, and now broke out into
almost jubilant utterance. At that moment I caught sight of Röckel, with two
men of the citizen army who were carrying some guns, making his way
towards me. He gave me a most friendly greeting, but turned at once to
Hiebendahl and his companion and asked him why he was idling about here
in uniform instead of being at his post. When Hiebendahl made the excuse
that his gun had been requisitioned, Röckel cried out to him, ‘You’re a fine
lot of fellows!’ and went away laughing. He gave me a brief account as we
proceeded of what had happened to him since I had lost sight of him, and
thus spared me the obligation of giving him a report of his Volksblatt. We
were interrupted by an imposing troop of well-armed young students of the
gymnasium who had just entered the city and wished to have a safe conduct
to their place of muster. The sight of these serried ranks of youthful figures,
numbering several hundreds, who were stepping bravely to their duty, did
Page 443
not fail to make the most elevating impression upon me. Röckel undertook
to accompany them over the barricade in safety to the mastering place in
front of the Town Hall. He took the opportunity of lamenting the utter
absence of true spirit which he had hitherto encountered in those in
command. He had proposed, in case of extremity, to defend the most
seriously threatened barricades by tiring them with pitch brands; at the mere
word the provisional government had fallen into a veritable state of panic. I
let him go his way in order that I might enjoy the privilege of a solitary
person and reach the Town Hall by a short cut, and it was not until thirteen
years later that I again set eyes upon him.
[15] These words refer to the opening of the Ninth Symphony chorus: ‘Freude,
Freude, Freude, schöner götterfunken Tochter aus Elysium’—(Praise her, praise
oh praise Joy, the god-descended daughter of Elysium.) English version by
Natalia Macfarren.—Editor.
In the Town Hall I learned from Bakunin that the provisional government
had passed a resolution, on his advice, to abandon the position in Dresden,
which had been entirely neglected from the beginning, and was
consequently quite untenable for any length of time. This resolution
proposed an armed retreat to the Erzgebirge, where it would be possible to
concentrate the reinforcements pouring in from all sides, especially from
Thuringia, in such strength, that the advantageous position could be used to
inaugurate a German civil war that would sound no hesitating note at its
outset. To persist in defending isolated barricaded streets in Dresden could,
on the other hand, lend little but the character of an urban riot to the contest,
although it was pursued with the highest courage. I must confess that this
idea seemed to me magnificent and full of meaning. Up to this moment I
had been moved only by a feeling of sympathy for a method of procedure
entered upon at first with almost ironical incredulity, and then pursued with
the vigour of surprise. Now, however, all that had before seemed
incomprehensible, unfolded itself before my vision in the form of a great
and hopeful solution. Without either feeling that I was in any way being
compelled, or that it was my vocation to get some part or function allotted
to me in these events, I now definitely abandoned all consideration for my
personal situation, and determined to surrender myself to the stream of
developments which flowed in the direction towards which my feelings had
driven me with a delight that was full of despair. Still, I did not wish to
leave my wife helpless in Dresden, and I rapidly devised a means of
to accompany them over the barricade in safety to the mastering place in
front of the Town Hall. He took the opportunity of lamenting the utter
absence of true spirit which he had hitherto encountered in those in
command. He had proposed, in case of extremity, to defend the most
seriously threatened barricades by tiring them with pitch brands; at the mere
word the provisional government had fallen into a veritable state of panic. I
let him go his way in order that I might enjoy the privilege of a solitary
person and reach the Town Hall by a short cut, and it was not until thirteen
years later that I again set eyes upon him.
[15] These words refer to the opening of the Ninth Symphony chorus: ‘Freude,
Freude, Freude, schöner götterfunken Tochter aus Elysium’—(Praise her, praise
oh praise Joy, the god-descended daughter of Elysium.) English version by
Natalia Macfarren.—Editor.
In the Town Hall I learned from Bakunin that the provisional government
had passed a resolution, on his advice, to abandon the position in Dresden,
which had been entirely neglected from the beginning, and was
consequently quite untenable for any length of time. This resolution
proposed an armed retreat to the Erzgebirge, where it would be possible to
concentrate the reinforcements pouring in from all sides, especially from
Thuringia, in such strength, that the advantageous position could be used to
inaugurate a German civil war that would sound no hesitating note at its
outset. To persist in defending isolated barricaded streets in Dresden could,
on the other hand, lend little but the character of an urban riot to the contest,
although it was pursued with the highest courage. I must confess that this
idea seemed to me magnificent and full of meaning. Up to this moment I
had been moved only by a feeling of sympathy for a method of procedure
entered upon at first with almost ironical incredulity, and then pursued with
the vigour of surprise. Now, however, all that had before seemed
incomprehensible, unfolded itself before my vision in the form of a great
and hopeful solution. Without either feeling that I was in any way being
compelled, or that it was my vocation to get some part or function allotted
to me in these events, I now definitely abandoned all consideration for my
personal situation, and determined to surrender myself to the stream of
developments which flowed in the direction towards which my feelings had
driven me with a delight that was full of despair. Still, I did not wish to
leave my wife helpless in Dresden, and I rapidly devised a means of
Page 444
drawing her into the path which I had chosen, without immediately
informing her of what my resolve meant. During my hasty return to
Friedrichstadt I recognised that this portion of the town had been almost
entirely cut off from the inner city by the occupation of the Prussian troops;
I saw in my mind’s eye our own suburb occupied, and the consequences of
a state of military siege in their most repulsive light. It was an easy job to
persuade Minna to accompany me on a visit, by way of the
Tharanderstrasse, which was still free, to Chemnitz, where my married
sister Clara lived. It was only a matter of a moment for her to arrange her
household orders, and she promised to follow me to the next village in an
hour with the parrot. I went on in advance with my little dog Peps, in order
to hire a carriage in which to proceed on our journey to Chemnitz. It was a
smiling spring morning when I traversed for the last time the paths I had so
often trod on my lonely walks, with the knowledge that I should never
wander along them again. While the larks were soaring to dizzy heights
above my head, and singing in the furrows of the fields, the light and heavy
artillery did not cease to thunder down the streets of Dresden. The noise of
this shooting, which had continued uninterruptedly for several days, had
hammered itself so indelibly upon my nerves, that it continued to re-echo
for a long time in my brain; just as the motion of the ship which took me to
London had made me stagger for some time afterwards. Accompanied by
this terrible music, I threw my parting greeting to the towers of the city that
lay behind me, and said to myself with a smile, that if, seven years ago, my
entry had taken place under thoroughly obscure auspices, at all events my
exit was conducted with some show of pomp and ceremony.
When at last I found myself with Minna in a one-horse carriage on the
way to the Erzgebirge, we frequently met armed reinforcements on their
way to Dresden. The sight of them always kindled an involuntary joy in us;
even my wife could not refrain from addressing words of encouragement to
the men; at present it seemed not a single barricade had been lost. On the
other hand, a gloomy impression was made upon us by a company of
regulars which was making its way towards Dresden in silence. We asked
some of them whither they were bound; and their answer, ‘To do their duty,’
had been obviously impressed upon them by command. At last we reached
my relations in Chemnitz. I terrified all those near and dear to me when I
declared my intention to return to Dresden on the following day at the
earliest possible hour, in order to ascertain how things were going there. In
informing her of what my resolve meant. During my hasty return to
Friedrichstadt I recognised that this portion of the town had been almost
entirely cut off from the inner city by the occupation of the Prussian troops;
I saw in my mind’s eye our own suburb occupied, and the consequences of
a state of military siege in their most repulsive light. It was an easy job to
persuade Minna to accompany me on a visit, by way of the
Tharanderstrasse, which was still free, to Chemnitz, where my married
sister Clara lived. It was only a matter of a moment for her to arrange her
household orders, and she promised to follow me to the next village in an
hour with the parrot. I went on in advance with my little dog Peps, in order
to hire a carriage in which to proceed on our journey to Chemnitz. It was a
smiling spring morning when I traversed for the last time the paths I had so
often trod on my lonely walks, with the knowledge that I should never
wander along them again. While the larks were soaring to dizzy heights
above my head, and singing in the furrows of the fields, the light and heavy
artillery did not cease to thunder down the streets of Dresden. The noise of
this shooting, which had continued uninterruptedly for several days, had
hammered itself so indelibly upon my nerves, that it continued to re-echo
for a long time in my brain; just as the motion of the ship which took me to
London had made me stagger for some time afterwards. Accompanied by
this terrible music, I threw my parting greeting to the towers of the city that
lay behind me, and said to myself with a smile, that if, seven years ago, my
entry had taken place under thoroughly obscure auspices, at all events my
exit was conducted with some show of pomp and ceremony.
When at last I found myself with Minna in a one-horse carriage on the
way to the Erzgebirge, we frequently met armed reinforcements on their
way to Dresden. The sight of them always kindled an involuntary joy in us;
even my wife could not refrain from addressing words of encouragement to
the men; at present it seemed not a single barricade had been lost. On the
other hand, a gloomy impression was made upon us by a company of
regulars which was making its way towards Dresden in silence. We asked
some of them whither they were bound; and their answer, ‘To do their duty,’
had been obviously impressed upon them by command. At last we reached
my relations in Chemnitz. I terrified all those near and dear to me when I
declared my intention to return to Dresden on the following day at the
earliest possible hour, in order to ascertain how things were going there. In
Page 445
spite of all attempts to dissuade me, I carried out my decision, pursued by a
suspicion that I should meet the armed forces of the Dresden people on the
country highroad in the act of retreat. The nearer I approached the capital,
the stronger became the confirmation of the rumours that, as yet, there was
no thought in Dresden of surrender or withdrawal, but that, on the contrary,
the contest was proving very favourable for the national party. All this
appeared to me like one miracle after another. On this day, Tuesday, 9th of
May, I once more forced my way in a high state of excitement over ground
which had become more and more inaccessible. All the highways had to be
avoided, and it was only possible to make progress through such houses as
had been broken through. At last I reached the Town Hall in the Altstadt,
just as night was falling. A truly terrible spectacle met my eyes, for I
crossed those parts of the town in which preparations had been made for a
house-to-house fight. The incessant groaning of big and small guns reduced
to an uncanny murmur all the other sounds that came from armed men
ceaselessly crying out to one another from barricade to barricade, and from
one house to another, which they had broken through. Pitch brands burnt
here and there, pale-faced figures lay prostrate around the watch-posts, half
dead with fatigue, and any unarmed wayfarer forcing a path for himself was
sharply challenged. Nothing, however, that I have lived through can be
compared with the impression that I received on my entry into the chambers
of the Town Hall. Here was a gloomy, and yet fairly compact and serious
mass of people; a look of unspeakable fatigue was upon all faces; not a
single voice had retained its natural tone. There was a hoarse jumble of
conversation inspired by a state of the highest tension. The only familiar
sight that survived was to be found in the old servants of the Town Hall in
their curious antiquated uniform and three-cornered hats. These tall men, at
other times an object of considerable fear, I found engaged partly in
buttering pieces of bread, and cutting slices of ham and sausage, and partly
in piling into baskets immense stores of provisions for the messengers sent
by the defenders of the barricades for supplies. These men had turned into
veritable nursing mothers of the revolution.
As I proceeded further, I came at last upon the members of the
provisional government, among whom Todt and Tschirner, after their first
panic-stricken flight, were once more to be found gliding to and fro,
gloomy as spectres, now that they were chained to the performance of their
heavy duties. Heubner alone had preserved his full energy; but he was a
suspicion that I should meet the armed forces of the Dresden people on the
country highroad in the act of retreat. The nearer I approached the capital,
the stronger became the confirmation of the rumours that, as yet, there was
no thought in Dresden of surrender or withdrawal, but that, on the contrary,
the contest was proving very favourable for the national party. All this
appeared to me like one miracle after another. On this day, Tuesday, 9th of
May, I once more forced my way in a high state of excitement over ground
which had become more and more inaccessible. All the highways had to be
avoided, and it was only possible to make progress through such houses as
had been broken through. At last I reached the Town Hall in the Altstadt,
just as night was falling. A truly terrible spectacle met my eyes, for I
crossed those parts of the town in which preparations had been made for a
house-to-house fight. The incessant groaning of big and small guns reduced
to an uncanny murmur all the other sounds that came from armed men
ceaselessly crying out to one another from barricade to barricade, and from
one house to another, which they had broken through. Pitch brands burnt
here and there, pale-faced figures lay prostrate around the watch-posts, half
dead with fatigue, and any unarmed wayfarer forcing a path for himself was
sharply challenged. Nothing, however, that I have lived through can be
compared with the impression that I received on my entry into the chambers
of the Town Hall. Here was a gloomy, and yet fairly compact and serious
mass of people; a look of unspeakable fatigue was upon all faces; not a
single voice had retained its natural tone. There was a hoarse jumble of
conversation inspired by a state of the highest tension. The only familiar
sight that survived was to be found in the old servants of the Town Hall in
their curious antiquated uniform and three-cornered hats. These tall men, at
other times an object of considerable fear, I found engaged partly in
buttering pieces of bread, and cutting slices of ham and sausage, and partly
in piling into baskets immense stores of provisions for the messengers sent
by the defenders of the barricades for supplies. These men had turned into
veritable nursing mothers of the revolution.
As I proceeded further, I came at last upon the members of the
provisional government, among whom Todt and Tschirner, after their first
panic-stricken flight, were once more to be found gliding to and fro,
gloomy as spectres, now that they were chained to the performance of their
heavy duties. Heubner alone had preserved his full energy; but he was a
Page 446
really piteous sight: a ghostly fire burned in his eyes which had not had a
wink of sleep for seven nights. He was delighted to see me again, as he
regarded my arrival as a good omen for the cause which he was defending;
while on the other hand, in the rapid succession of events, he had come into
contact with elements about which no conclusion could shape itself to his
complete satisfaction. I found Bakunin’s outlook undisturbed, and his
attitude firm and quiet. He did not show the smallest change in his
appearance, in spite of having had no sleep during the whole time, which I
afterwards heard was a fact. With a cigar in his mouth he received me,
seated on one of the mattresses which lay distributed over the floor of the
Town Hall. At his side was a very young Pole (a Galician) named
Haimberger, a violinist whom he had once asked me to recommend to
Lipinsky, in order that he might give him lessons, as he did not want this
raw and inexperienced boy, who had become passionately attached to him,
to get drawn into the vortex of the present upheavals. Now that Haimberger
had shouldered a gun, and presented himself for service at the barricades,
however, Bakunin had greeted him none the less joyfully. He had drawn
him down to sit by his side on the couch, and every time the youth
shuddered with fear at the violent sound of the cannon-shot, he slapped him
vigorously on the back and cried out: ‘You are not in the company of your
fiddle here, my friend. What a pity you didn’t stay where you were!’
Bakinin then gave me a short and precise account of what had happened
since I had left him on the previous morning. The retreat which had then
been decided upon soon proved unadvisable, as it would have discouraged
the numerous reinforcements which had already arrived on that day.
Moreover, the desire for fighting had been so great, and the force of the
defenders so considerable, that it had been possible to oppose the enemy’s
troops successfully so far. But as the latter had also got large
reinforcements, they again had been able to make an effective combined
attack on the strong Wildstruf barricade. The Prussian troops had avoided
fighting in the streets, choosing instead the method of fighting from house
to house by breaking through the walls. This had made it clear that all
defence by barricades had become useless, and that the enemy would
succeed slowly but surely in drawing near the Town Hall, the seat of the
provisional government. Bakunin had now proposed that all the powder
stores should be brought together in the lower rooms of the Town Hall, and
that on the approach of the enemy it should be blown up. The town council,
wink of sleep for seven nights. He was delighted to see me again, as he
regarded my arrival as a good omen for the cause which he was defending;
while on the other hand, in the rapid succession of events, he had come into
contact with elements about which no conclusion could shape itself to his
complete satisfaction. I found Bakunin’s outlook undisturbed, and his
attitude firm and quiet. He did not show the smallest change in his
appearance, in spite of having had no sleep during the whole time, which I
afterwards heard was a fact. With a cigar in his mouth he received me,
seated on one of the mattresses which lay distributed over the floor of the
Town Hall. At his side was a very young Pole (a Galician) named
Haimberger, a violinist whom he had once asked me to recommend to
Lipinsky, in order that he might give him lessons, as he did not want this
raw and inexperienced boy, who had become passionately attached to him,
to get drawn into the vortex of the present upheavals. Now that Haimberger
had shouldered a gun, and presented himself for service at the barricades,
however, Bakunin had greeted him none the less joyfully. He had drawn
him down to sit by his side on the couch, and every time the youth
shuddered with fear at the violent sound of the cannon-shot, he slapped him
vigorously on the back and cried out: ‘You are not in the company of your
fiddle here, my friend. What a pity you didn’t stay where you were!’
Bakinin then gave me a short and precise account of what had happened
since I had left him on the previous morning. The retreat which had then
been decided upon soon proved unadvisable, as it would have discouraged
the numerous reinforcements which had already arrived on that day.
Moreover, the desire for fighting had been so great, and the force of the
defenders so considerable, that it had been possible to oppose the enemy’s
troops successfully so far. But as the latter had also got large
reinforcements, they again had been able to make an effective combined
attack on the strong Wildstruf barricade. The Prussian troops had avoided
fighting in the streets, choosing instead the method of fighting from house
to house by breaking through the walls. This had made it clear that all
defence by barricades had become useless, and that the enemy would
succeed slowly but surely in drawing near the Town Hall, the seat of the
provisional government. Bakunin had now proposed that all the powder
stores should be brought together in the lower rooms of the Town Hall, and
that on the approach of the enemy it should be blown up. The town council,
Page 447
who were still in consultation in a back room, had remonstrated with the
greatest vehemence. Bakunin, however, had insisted with great firmness on
the execution of the measure, but in the end had been completely outwitted
by the removal of all the powder stores. Moreover, Heubner, to whom
Bakunin could refuse nothing, had been won over to the other side. It was
now decided that as everything was ready, the retreat to the Erzgebirge,
which had originally been intended for the previous day, should be fixed for
the early morrow. Young Zichlinsky had already received orders to cover
the road to Plauen so as to make it strategically safe. When I inquired after
Röckel, Bakunin replied swiftly that he had not been seen since the
previous evening, and that he had most likely allowed himself to be caught:
he was in such a nervous state. I now gave an account of what I had
observed on my way to and from Chemnitz, describing the great masses of
reinforcements, amongst which was the communal guard of that place,
several thousands strong. In Freiberg I had met four hundred reservists, who
had come in excellent form to back the citizen army, but could not proceed
further, as they were tired out by their forced march. It seemed obvious that
this was a case in which the necessary energy to requisition wagons had
been lacking, and that if the bounds of loyalty were transgressed in this
matter, the advent of fresh forces would be considerably promoted. I was
begged to make my way back at once, and convey the opinion of the
provisional government to the people whose acquaintance I had made. My
old friend Marschall von Bieberstein immediately proposed to accompany
me. I welcomed his offer, as he was an officer of the provisional
government, and was consequently more fitted than I was to communicate
orders. This man, who had been almost extravagant in his enthusiasm
before, was now utterly exhausted by sleeplessness, and unable to emit
another word from his hoarse throat. He now made his way with me from
the Town Hall to his house in the suburb of Plauen by the devious ways that
had been indicated to us, in order to requisition a carriage for our purpose
from a coachman he knew, and to bid farewell to his family, from whom he
assumed he would in all probability have to separate himself for some time.
While we were waiting for the coachman we had tea and supper, talking
the while, in a fairly calm and composed manner, with the ladies of the
house. We arrived at Freiberg early the following morning, after various
adventures, and I set out forthwith to find the leaders of the reservist
contingent with whom I was already acquainted. Marschall advised them to
greatest vehemence. Bakunin, however, had insisted with great firmness on
the execution of the measure, but in the end had been completely outwitted
by the removal of all the powder stores. Moreover, Heubner, to whom
Bakunin could refuse nothing, had been won over to the other side. It was
now decided that as everything was ready, the retreat to the Erzgebirge,
which had originally been intended for the previous day, should be fixed for
the early morrow. Young Zichlinsky had already received orders to cover
the road to Plauen so as to make it strategically safe. When I inquired after
Röckel, Bakunin replied swiftly that he had not been seen since the
previous evening, and that he had most likely allowed himself to be caught:
he was in such a nervous state. I now gave an account of what I had
observed on my way to and from Chemnitz, describing the great masses of
reinforcements, amongst which was the communal guard of that place,
several thousands strong. In Freiberg I had met four hundred reservists, who
had come in excellent form to back the citizen army, but could not proceed
further, as they were tired out by their forced march. It seemed obvious that
this was a case in which the necessary energy to requisition wagons had
been lacking, and that if the bounds of loyalty were transgressed in this
matter, the advent of fresh forces would be considerably promoted. I was
begged to make my way back at once, and convey the opinion of the
provisional government to the people whose acquaintance I had made. My
old friend Marschall von Bieberstein immediately proposed to accompany
me. I welcomed his offer, as he was an officer of the provisional
government, and was consequently more fitted than I was to communicate
orders. This man, who had been almost extravagant in his enthusiasm
before, was now utterly exhausted by sleeplessness, and unable to emit
another word from his hoarse throat. He now made his way with me from
the Town Hall to his house in the suburb of Plauen by the devious ways that
had been indicated to us, in order to requisition a carriage for our purpose
from a coachman he knew, and to bid farewell to his family, from whom he
assumed he would in all probability have to separate himself for some time.
While we were waiting for the coachman we had tea and supper, talking
the while, in a fairly calm and composed manner, with the ladies of the
house. We arrived at Freiberg early the following morning, after various
adventures, and I set out forthwith to find the leaders of the reservist
contingent with whom I was already acquainted. Marschall advised them to
Page 448
requisition horses and carts in the villages wherever they could do so. When
they had all set off in marching order for Dresden, and while I was feeling
impelled by my passionate interest in the fate of that city to return to it once
more, Marschall conceived the desire to carry his commission further
afield, and for this purpose asked to be allowed to leave me. Whereupon I
again turned my back on the heights of the Erzgebirge, and was travelling
by special coach in the direction of Tharand, when I too was overcome with
sleep, and was only awakened by violent shouts and the sound of some one
holding a parley with the postillion. On opening my eyes I found, to my
astonishment, that the road was filled with armed revolutionaries marching,
not towards, but away from Dresden, and some of them were trying to
commandeer the coach to relieve their weariness on the way back.
‘What is the matter?’ I cried. ‘Where are you going?’
‘Home,’ was the reply. ‘It is all over in Dresden. The provincial
government is close behind us in that carriage down there.’
I shot out of the coach like a dart, leaving it at the disposal of the tired
men, and hurried on, down the steeply sloping road, to meet the ill-fated
party. And there I actually found them—Heubner, Bakunin, and Martin, the
energetic post-office clerk, the two latter armed with muskets—in a smart
hired carriage from Dresden which was coming slowly up the hill. On the
box were, as I supposed, the secretaries, while as many as possible of the
weary National Guard struggled for seats behind. I hastened to swing
myself into the coach, and so came in for a conversation which thereupon
took place between the driver, who was also the owner of the coach, and the
provisional government. The man was imploring them to spare his carriage,
which, he said, was very lightly sprung and quite unequal to carrying such a
load; he begged that the people should be told not to seat themselves behind
and in front. But Bakunin remained quite unconcerned, and elected to give
me a short account of the retreat from Dresden, which had been
successfully achieved without loss. He had had the trees in the newly
planted Maximilian Avenue felled early in the morning to form a barricade
against a possible flank attack of cavalry, and had been immensely
entertained by the lamentations of the inhabitants, who during the process
did nothing but bewail their Scheene Beeme.[16] All this time our driver’s
lamentations over his coach were growing more importunate. Finally he
broke into loud sobs and tears, upon which Bakunin, regarding him with
they had all set off in marching order for Dresden, and while I was feeling
impelled by my passionate interest in the fate of that city to return to it once
more, Marschall conceived the desire to carry his commission further
afield, and for this purpose asked to be allowed to leave me. Whereupon I
again turned my back on the heights of the Erzgebirge, and was travelling
by special coach in the direction of Tharand, when I too was overcome with
sleep, and was only awakened by violent shouts and the sound of some one
holding a parley with the postillion. On opening my eyes I found, to my
astonishment, that the road was filled with armed revolutionaries marching,
not towards, but away from Dresden, and some of them were trying to
commandeer the coach to relieve their weariness on the way back.
‘What is the matter?’ I cried. ‘Where are you going?’
‘Home,’ was the reply. ‘It is all over in Dresden. The provincial
government is close behind us in that carriage down there.’
I shot out of the coach like a dart, leaving it at the disposal of the tired
men, and hurried on, down the steeply sloping road, to meet the ill-fated
party. And there I actually found them—Heubner, Bakunin, and Martin, the
energetic post-office clerk, the two latter armed with muskets—in a smart
hired carriage from Dresden which was coming slowly up the hill. On the
box were, as I supposed, the secretaries, while as many as possible of the
weary National Guard struggled for seats behind. I hastened to swing
myself into the coach, and so came in for a conversation which thereupon
took place between the driver, who was also the owner of the coach, and the
provisional government. The man was imploring them to spare his carriage,
which, he said, was very lightly sprung and quite unequal to carrying such a
load; he begged that the people should be told not to seat themselves behind
and in front. But Bakunin remained quite unconcerned, and elected to give
me a short account of the retreat from Dresden, which had been
successfully achieved without loss. He had had the trees in the newly
planted Maximilian Avenue felled early in the morning to form a barricade
against a possible flank attack of cavalry, and had been immensely
entertained by the lamentations of the inhabitants, who during the process
did nothing but bewail their Scheene Beeme.[16] All this time our driver’s
lamentations over his coach were growing more importunate. Finally he
broke into loud sobs and tears, upon which Bakunin, regarding him with
Page 449
positive pleasure, called out: ‘The tears of a Philistine are nectar for the
gods.’ He would not vouchsafe him a word, but Heubner and I found the
scene tiresome, whereupon he asked me whether we two at least should not
get out, as he could not ask it of the others. As a matter of fact, it was high
time to leave the coach, as some new contingents of revolutionaries had
formed up in rank and file all along the highway to salute the provisional
government and receive orders. Heubner strode down the line with great
dignity, acquainted the leaders with the state of affairs, and exhorted them
to keep their trust in the righteousness of the cause for which so many had
shed their blood. All were now to retire to Freiberg, there to await further
orders.
[16] Saxon corruption of schöne Bäume, beautiful trees.—EDITOR.
A youngish man of serious mien now stepped forward from the ranks of
the rebels to place himself under the special protection of the provisional
government. He was a certain Menzdorff, a German Catholic priest whom I
had had the advantage of meeting in Dresden. (It was he who, in the course
of a significant conversation, had first induced me to read Feuerbach.) He
had been dragged along as a prisoner and abominably treated by the
Chemnitz municipal guard on this particular march, having originally been
the instigator of a demonstration to force that body to take up arms and
march to Dresden. He owed his freedom only to the chance meeting with
other better disposed volunteer corps. We saw this Chemnitz town guard
ourselves, stationed far away on a hill. They sent representatives to beseech
Heubner to tell them how things stood. When they had received the
information required, and had been told that the fight would be continued in
a determined manner, they invited the provisional government to quarter at
Chemnitz. As soon as they rejoined their main body we saw them wheel
round and turn back.
With many similar interruptions the somewhat disorganised procession
reached Freiberg. Here some friends of Heubner’s came to meet him in the
streets with the urgent request not to plunge their native place into the
misery of desperate street-fighting by establishing the provisional
government there. Heubner made no reply to this, but requested Bakunin
and myself to accompany him into his house for a consultation. First we
had to witness the painful meeting between Heubner and his wife; in a few
words he pointed out the gravity and importance of the task assigned to
gods.’ He would not vouchsafe him a word, but Heubner and I found the
scene tiresome, whereupon he asked me whether we two at least should not
get out, as he could not ask it of the others. As a matter of fact, it was high
time to leave the coach, as some new contingents of revolutionaries had
formed up in rank and file all along the highway to salute the provisional
government and receive orders. Heubner strode down the line with great
dignity, acquainted the leaders with the state of affairs, and exhorted them
to keep their trust in the righteousness of the cause for which so many had
shed their blood. All were now to retire to Freiberg, there to await further
orders.
[16] Saxon corruption of schöne Bäume, beautiful trees.—EDITOR.
A youngish man of serious mien now stepped forward from the ranks of
the rebels to place himself under the special protection of the provisional
government. He was a certain Menzdorff, a German Catholic priest whom I
had had the advantage of meeting in Dresden. (It was he who, in the course
of a significant conversation, had first induced me to read Feuerbach.) He
had been dragged along as a prisoner and abominably treated by the
Chemnitz municipal guard on this particular march, having originally been
the instigator of a demonstration to force that body to take up arms and
march to Dresden. He owed his freedom only to the chance meeting with
other better disposed volunteer corps. We saw this Chemnitz town guard
ourselves, stationed far away on a hill. They sent representatives to beseech
Heubner to tell them how things stood. When they had received the
information required, and had been told that the fight would be continued in
a determined manner, they invited the provisional government to quarter at
Chemnitz. As soon as they rejoined their main body we saw them wheel
round and turn back.
With many similar interruptions the somewhat disorganised procession
reached Freiberg. Here some friends of Heubner’s came to meet him in the
streets with the urgent request not to plunge their native place into the
misery of desperate street-fighting by establishing the provisional
government there. Heubner made no reply to this, but requested Bakunin
and myself to accompany him into his house for a consultation. First we
had to witness the painful meeting between Heubner and his wife; in a few
words he pointed out the gravity and importance of the task assigned to
Page 450
him, reminding her that it was for Germany and the high destiny of his
country that he was staking his life.
Breakfast was then prepared, and after the meal, during which a fairly
cheerful mood prevailed, Heubner made a short speech to Bakunin,
speaking quietly but firmly. ‘My dear Bakunin,’ he said (his previous
acquaintance with Bakunin was so slight that he did not even know how to
pronounce his name), ‘before we decide anything further, I must ask you to
state clearly whether your political aim is really the Red Republic, of which
they tell me you are a partisan. Tell me frankly, so that I may know if I can
rely on your friendship in the future?’
Bakunin explained briefly that he had no scheme for any political form of
government, and would not risk his life for any of them. As for his own far-
reaching desires and hopes, they had nothing whatever to do with the street-
fighting in Dresden and all that this implied for Germany. He had looked
upon the rising in Dresden as a foolish, ludicrous movement until he
realised the effect of Heubner’s noble and courageous example. From that
moment every political consideration and aim had been put in the
background by his sympathy with this heroic attitude, and he had
immediately resolved to assist this excellent man with all the devotion and
energy of a friend. He knew, of course, that he belonged to the so-called
moderate party, of whose political future he was not able to form an
opinion, as he had not profited much by his opportunities of studying the
position of the various parties in Germany.
Heubner declared himself satisfied by this reply, and proceeded to ask
Bakunin’s opinion of the present state of things—whether it would not be
conscientious and reasonable to dismiss the men and give up a struggle
which might be considered hopeless. In reply Bakunin insisted, with his
usual calm assurance, that whoever else threw up the sponge, Heubner must
certainly not do so. He had been the first member of the provisional
government, and it was he who had given the call to arms. The call had
been obeyed, and hundreds of lives had been sacrificed; to scatter the
people again would look as if these sacrifices had been made to idle folly.
Even if they were the only two left, they still ought not to forsake their
posts. If they went under their lives might be forfeit, but their honour must
remain unsullied, so that a similar appeal in the future might not drive every
one to despair.
country that he was staking his life.
Breakfast was then prepared, and after the meal, during which a fairly
cheerful mood prevailed, Heubner made a short speech to Bakunin,
speaking quietly but firmly. ‘My dear Bakunin,’ he said (his previous
acquaintance with Bakunin was so slight that he did not even know how to
pronounce his name), ‘before we decide anything further, I must ask you to
state clearly whether your political aim is really the Red Republic, of which
they tell me you are a partisan. Tell me frankly, so that I may know if I can
rely on your friendship in the future?’
Bakunin explained briefly that he had no scheme for any political form of
government, and would not risk his life for any of them. As for his own far-
reaching desires and hopes, they had nothing whatever to do with the street-
fighting in Dresden and all that this implied for Germany. He had looked
upon the rising in Dresden as a foolish, ludicrous movement until he
realised the effect of Heubner’s noble and courageous example. From that
moment every political consideration and aim had been put in the
background by his sympathy with this heroic attitude, and he had
immediately resolved to assist this excellent man with all the devotion and
energy of a friend. He knew, of course, that he belonged to the so-called
moderate party, of whose political future he was not able to form an
opinion, as he had not profited much by his opportunities of studying the
position of the various parties in Germany.
Heubner declared himself satisfied by this reply, and proceeded to ask
Bakunin’s opinion of the present state of things—whether it would not be
conscientious and reasonable to dismiss the men and give up a struggle
which might be considered hopeless. In reply Bakunin insisted, with his
usual calm assurance, that whoever else threw up the sponge, Heubner must
certainly not do so. He had been the first member of the provisional
government, and it was he who had given the call to arms. The call had
been obeyed, and hundreds of lives had been sacrificed; to scatter the
people again would look as if these sacrifices had been made to idle folly.
Even if they were the only two left, they still ought not to forsake their
posts. If they went under their lives might be forfeit, but their honour must
remain unsullied, so that a similar appeal in the future might not drive every
one to despair.
Page 451
This was quite enough for Heubner. He at once made out a summons for
the election of a representative assembly for Saxony, to be held at
Chemnitz. He thought that, with the assistance of the populace and of the
numerous insurgent bands who were arriving from all quarters, he would be
able to hold the town as the headquarters of a provisional government until
the general situation in Germany had become more settled. In the midst of
these discussions, Stephan Born walked into the room to report that he had
brought the armed bands right into Freiberg, in good order and without any
losses. This young man was a compositor who had contributed greatly to
Heubner’s peace of mind during the last three days in Dresden by taking
over the chief command. His simplicity of manner made a very encouraging
impression on us, particularly when we heard his report. When, however,
Heubner asked whether he would undertake to defend Freiberg against the
troops which might be expected to attack at any moment, he declared that
this was an experienced officer’s job, and that he himself was no soldier and
knew nothing of strategy. Under these circumstances it seemed better, if
only to gain time, to fall back on the more thickly populated town of
Chemnitz. The first thing to be done, however, was to see that the
revolutionaries, who were assembled in large numbers at Freiberg, were
properly cared for, and Born went off immediately to make preliminary
arrangements. Heubner also took leave of us, and went to refresh his tired
brain by an hour’s sleep. I was left alone on the sofa with Bakunin, who
soon fell towards me, overcome by irresistible drowsiness, and dropped the
terrific weight of his head on to my shoulder. As I saw that he would not
wake if I shook off this burden, I pushed him aside with some difficulty,
and took leave both of the sleeper and of Heubner’s house; for I wished to
see for myself, as I had done for many days past, what course these
extraordinary events were taking. I therefore went to the Town Hall, where I
found the townspeople entertaining to the best of their ability a blustering
horde of excited revolutionaries both within and without the walls. To my
surprise, I found Heubner there in the full swing of work. I thought he was
asleep at home, but the idea of leaving the people even for an hour without
a counsellor had driven away all thought of rest. He had lost no time in
superintending the organisation of a sort of commandant’s office, and was
again occupied with drafting and signing documents in the midst of the
uproar that raged on all sides. It was not long before Bakunin too put in an
appearance, principally in search of a good officer—who was not, however,
the election of a representative assembly for Saxony, to be held at
Chemnitz. He thought that, with the assistance of the populace and of the
numerous insurgent bands who were arriving from all quarters, he would be
able to hold the town as the headquarters of a provisional government until
the general situation in Germany had become more settled. In the midst of
these discussions, Stephan Born walked into the room to report that he had
brought the armed bands right into Freiberg, in good order and without any
losses. This young man was a compositor who had contributed greatly to
Heubner’s peace of mind during the last three days in Dresden by taking
over the chief command. His simplicity of manner made a very encouraging
impression on us, particularly when we heard his report. When, however,
Heubner asked whether he would undertake to defend Freiberg against the
troops which might be expected to attack at any moment, he declared that
this was an experienced officer’s job, and that he himself was no soldier and
knew nothing of strategy. Under these circumstances it seemed better, if
only to gain time, to fall back on the more thickly populated town of
Chemnitz. The first thing to be done, however, was to see that the
revolutionaries, who were assembled in large numbers at Freiberg, were
properly cared for, and Born went off immediately to make preliminary
arrangements. Heubner also took leave of us, and went to refresh his tired
brain by an hour’s sleep. I was left alone on the sofa with Bakunin, who
soon fell towards me, overcome by irresistible drowsiness, and dropped the
terrific weight of his head on to my shoulder. As I saw that he would not
wake if I shook off this burden, I pushed him aside with some difficulty,
and took leave both of the sleeper and of Heubner’s house; for I wished to
see for myself, as I had done for many days past, what course these
extraordinary events were taking. I therefore went to the Town Hall, where I
found the townspeople entertaining to the best of their ability a blustering
horde of excited revolutionaries both within and without the walls. To my
surprise, I found Heubner there in the full swing of work. I thought he was
asleep at home, but the idea of leaving the people even for an hour without
a counsellor had driven away all thought of rest. He had lost no time in
superintending the organisation of a sort of commandant’s office, and was
again occupied with drafting and signing documents in the midst of the
uproar that raged on all sides. It was not long before Bakunin too put in an
appearance, principally in search of a good officer—who was not, however,
Page 452
forthcoming. The commandant of a large contingent from the Vogtland, an
oldish man, raised Bakunin’s hopes by the impassioned energy of his
speeches, and he would have had him appointed commandant-general on
the spot. But it seemed as if any real decision were impossible in that frenzy
and confusion, and as the only hope of mastering it seemed to be in
reaching Chemnitz, Heubner gave the order to march on towards that town
as soon as every one had had food. Once this was settled, I told my friends I
should go on in advance of their column to Chemnitz, where I should find
them again next day; for I longed to be quit of this chaos. I actually caught
the coach, the departure of which was fixed for that time, and obtained a
seat in it. But the revolutionaries were just marching off on the same road,
and we were told that we must wait until they had passed to avoid being
caught in the whirlpool. This meant considerable delay, and for a long while
I watched the peculiar bearing of the patriots as they marched out. I noticed
in particular a Vogtland regiment, whose marching step was fairly orthodox,
following the beat of a drummer who tried to vary the monotony of his
instrument in an artistic manner by hitting the wooden frame alternately
with the drumhead. The unpleasant rattling tone thus produced reminded
me in ghostly fashion of the rattling of the skeletons’ bones in the dance
round the gallows by night which Berlioz had brought home to my
imagination with such terrible realism in his performance of the last
movement of his Sinfonie Fantastique in Paris.
Suddenly the desire seized me to look up the friends I had left behind,
and travel to Chemnitz in their company if possible. I found they had
quitted the Town Hall, and on reaching Heubner’s house I was told that he
was asleep. I therefore went back to the coach, which, however, was still
putting off its departure, as the road was blocked with troops. I walked
nervously up and down for some time, then, losing faith in the journey by
coach, I went back again to Heubner’s house to offer myself definitely as a
travelling companion. But Heubner and Bakunin had already left home, and
I could find no traces of them. In desperation I returned once more to the
coach, and found it by this time really ready to start. After various delays
and adventures it brought me late at night to Chemnitz, where I got out and
betook myself to the nearest inn. At five o’clock the next morning I got up
(after a few hours’ sleep) and set out to find my brother-in-law Wolfram’s
house, which was about a quarter of an hour’s walk from the town. On the
oldish man, raised Bakunin’s hopes by the impassioned energy of his
speeches, and he would have had him appointed commandant-general on
the spot. But it seemed as if any real decision were impossible in that frenzy
and confusion, and as the only hope of mastering it seemed to be in
reaching Chemnitz, Heubner gave the order to march on towards that town
as soon as every one had had food. Once this was settled, I told my friends I
should go on in advance of their column to Chemnitz, where I should find
them again next day; for I longed to be quit of this chaos. I actually caught
the coach, the departure of which was fixed for that time, and obtained a
seat in it. But the revolutionaries were just marching off on the same road,
and we were told that we must wait until they had passed to avoid being
caught in the whirlpool. This meant considerable delay, and for a long while
I watched the peculiar bearing of the patriots as they marched out. I noticed
in particular a Vogtland regiment, whose marching step was fairly orthodox,
following the beat of a drummer who tried to vary the monotony of his
instrument in an artistic manner by hitting the wooden frame alternately
with the drumhead. The unpleasant rattling tone thus produced reminded
me in ghostly fashion of the rattling of the skeletons’ bones in the dance
round the gallows by night which Berlioz had brought home to my
imagination with such terrible realism in his performance of the last
movement of his Sinfonie Fantastique in Paris.
Suddenly the desire seized me to look up the friends I had left behind,
and travel to Chemnitz in their company if possible. I found they had
quitted the Town Hall, and on reaching Heubner’s house I was told that he
was asleep. I therefore went back to the coach, which, however, was still
putting off its departure, as the road was blocked with troops. I walked
nervously up and down for some time, then, losing faith in the journey by
coach, I went back again to Heubner’s house to offer myself definitely as a
travelling companion. But Heubner and Bakunin had already left home, and
I could find no traces of them. In desperation I returned once more to the
coach, and found it by this time really ready to start. After various delays
and adventures it brought me late at night to Chemnitz, where I got out and
betook myself to the nearest inn. At five o’clock the next morning I got up
(after a few hours’ sleep) and set out to find my brother-in-law Wolfram’s
house, which was about a quarter of an hour’s walk from the town. On the
Page 453
way I asked a sentinel of the town guard whether he knew anything about
the arrival of the provisional government.
‘Provisional government?’ was the reply. ‘Why, it’s all up with that.’ I did
not understand him, nor was I able to learn anything about the state of
things when I first reached the house of my relatives, for my brother-in-law
had been sent into the town as special constable. It was only on his return
home, lute in the afternoon, that I heard what had taken place in one hotel at
Chemnitz while I had been resting in another inn. Heubner, Bakunin, and
the man called Martin, whom I have mentioned already, had, it seemed,
arrived before me in a hackney-coach at the gates of Chemnitz. On being
asked for their names Heubner had announced himself in a tone of
authority, and had bidden the town councillors come to him at a certain
hotel. They had no sooner reached the hotel than they all three collapsed
from excessive fatigue. Suddenly the police broke into the room and
arrested them in the name of the local government, upon which they only
begged to have a few hours’ quiet sleep, pointing out that flight was out of
the question in their present condition. I heard further that they had been
removed to Altenburg under a strong military escort. My brother-in-law was
obliged to confess that the Chemnitz municipal guard, which had been
forced to start for Dresden much against its will, and had resolved at the
very outset to place itself at the disposal of the royal forces on arriving
there, had deceived Heubner by inviting him to Chemnitz, and had lured
him into the trap. They had reached Chemnitz long before Heubner, and had
taken over the guard at the gates with the object of seeing him arrive and of
preparing for his arrest at once. My brother-in-law had been very anxious
about me too, as he had been told in furious tones by the leaders of the town
guard that I had been seen in close association with the revolutionaries. He
thought it a wonderful intervention of Providence that I had not arrived at
Chemnitz with them and gone to the same inn, in which case their fate
would certainly have been mine. The recollection of my escape from almost
certain death in duels with the most experienced swordsmen in my student
days flashed across me like a flash of lightning. This last terrible experience
made such an impression on me that I was incapable of breathing a word in
connection with what had happened. My brother-in-law, in response to
urgent appeals—from my wife in particular, who was much concerned for
my personal safety—undertook to convey me to Altenburg in his carriage
by night. From there I continued my journey by coach to Weimar, where I
the arrival of the provisional government.
‘Provisional government?’ was the reply. ‘Why, it’s all up with that.’ I did
not understand him, nor was I able to learn anything about the state of
things when I first reached the house of my relatives, for my brother-in-law
had been sent into the town as special constable. It was only on his return
home, lute in the afternoon, that I heard what had taken place in one hotel at
Chemnitz while I had been resting in another inn. Heubner, Bakunin, and
the man called Martin, whom I have mentioned already, had, it seemed,
arrived before me in a hackney-coach at the gates of Chemnitz. On being
asked for their names Heubner had announced himself in a tone of
authority, and had bidden the town councillors come to him at a certain
hotel. They had no sooner reached the hotel than they all three collapsed
from excessive fatigue. Suddenly the police broke into the room and
arrested them in the name of the local government, upon which they only
begged to have a few hours’ quiet sleep, pointing out that flight was out of
the question in their present condition. I heard further that they had been
removed to Altenburg under a strong military escort. My brother-in-law was
obliged to confess that the Chemnitz municipal guard, which had been
forced to start for Dresden much against its will, and had resolved at the
very outset to place itself at the disposal of the royal forces on arriving
there, had deceived Heubner by inviting him to Chemnitz, and had lured
him into the trap. They had reached Chemnitz long before Heubner, and had
taken over the guard at the gates with the object of seeing him arrive and of
preparing for his arrest at once. My brother-in-law had been very anxious
about me too, as he had been told in furious tones by the leaders of the town
guard that I had been seen in close association with the revolutionaries. He
thought it a wonderful intervention of Providence that I had not arrived at
Chemnitz with them and gone to the same inn, in which case their fate
would certainly have been mine. The recollection of my escape from almost
certain death in duels with the most experienced swordsmen in my student
days flashed across me like a flash of lightning. This last terrible experience
made such an impression on me that I was incapable of breathing a word in
connection with what had happened. My brother-in-law, in response to
urgent appeals—from my wife in particular, who was much concerned for
my personal safety—undertook to convey me to Altenburg in his carriage
by night. From there I continued my journey by coach to Weimar, where I
Page 454
had originally planned to spend my holidays, little thinking that I should
arrive by such devious ways.
The dreamy unreality of my state of mind at this time is best explained
by the apparent seriousness with which, on meeting Liszt again, I at once
began to discuss what seemed to be the sole topic of any real interest to him
in connection with me—the forthcoming revival of Tannhäuser at Weimar. I
found it very difficult to confess to this friend that I had not left Dresden in
the regulation way for a conductor of the royal opera. To tell the truth, I had
a very hazy conception of the relation in which I stood to the law of my
country (in the narrow sense). Had I done anything criminal in the eye of
the law or not? I found it impossible to come to any conclusion about it.
Meanwhile, alarming news of the terrible conditions in Dresden continued
to pour into Weimar. Genast, the stage manager, in particular, aroused great
excitement by spreading the report that Röckel, who was well known at
Weimar, had been guilty of arson. Liszt must soon have gathered from my
conversation, in which I did not take the trouble to dissimulate, that I too
was suspiciously connected with these terrible events, though my attitude
with regard to them misled him for some time. For I was not by any means
prepared to proclaim myself a combatant in the recent fights, and that for
reasons quite other than would have seemed valid in the eyes of the law. My
friend was therefore encouraged in his delusion by the unpremeditated
effect of my attitude. When we met at the house of Princess Caroline of
Wittgenstein, to whom I had been introduced the year before when she paid
her flying visit to Dresden, we were able to hold stimulating conversations
on all sorts of artistic topics. One afternoon, for instance, a lively discussion
sprang up from a description I had given of a tragedy to be entitled Jesus of
Nazareth. Liszt maintained a discreet silence after I had finished, whereas
the Princess protested vigorously against my proposal to bring such a
subject on to the stage. From the lukewarm attempt I made to support the
paradoxical theories I had put forward, I realised the state of my mind at
that time. Although it was not very evident to onlookers, I had been, and
still was, shaken to the very depths of my being by my recent experiences.
In due course an orchestral rehearsal of Tannhäuser took place, which in
various ways stimulated the artist in me afresh. Liszt’s conducting, though
mainly concerned with the musical rather than the dramatic side, filled me
for the first time with the flattering warmth of emotion roused by the
consciousness of being understood by another mind in full sympathy with
arrive by such devious ways.
The dreamy unreality of my state of mind at this time is best explained
by the apparent seriousness with which, on meeting Liszt again, I at once
began to discuss what seemed to be the sole topic of any real interest to him
in connection with me—the forthcoming revival of Tannhäuser at Weimar. I
found it very difficult to confess to this friend that I had not left Dresden in
the regulation way for a conductor of the royal opera. To tell the truth, I had
a very hazy conception of the relation in which I stood to the law of my
country (in the narrow sense). Had I done anything criminal in the eye of
the law or not? I found it impossible to come to any conclusion about it.
Meanwhile, alarming news of the terrible conditions in Dresden continued
to pour into Weimar. Genast, the stage manager, in particular, aroused great
excitement by spreading the report that Röckel, who was well known at
Weimar, had been guilty of arson. Liszt must soon have gathered from my
conversation, in which I did not take the trouble to dissimulate, that I too
was suspiciously connected with these terrible events, though my attitude
with regard to them misled him for some time. For I was not by any means
prepared to proclaim myself a combatant in the recent fights, and that for
reasons quite other than would have seemed valid in the eyes of the law. My
friend was therefore encouraged in his delusion by the unpremeditated
effect of my attitude. When we met at the house of Princess Caroline of
Wittgenstein, to whom I had been introduced the year before when she paid
her flying visit to Dresden, we were able to hold stimulating conversations
on all sorts of artistic topics. One afternoon, for instance, a lively discussion
sprang up from a description I had given of a tragedy to be entitled Jesus of
Nazareth. Liszt maintained a discreet silence after I had finished, whereas
the Princess protested vigorously against my proposal to bring such a
subject on to the stage. From the lukewarm attempt I made to support the
paradoxical theories I had put forward, I realised the state of my mind at
that time. Although it was not very evident to onlookers, I had been, and
still was, shaken to the very depths of my being by my recent experiences.
In due course an orchestral rehearsal of Tannhäuser took place, which in
various ways stimulated the artist in me afresh. Liszt’s conducting, though
mainly concerned with the musical rather than the dramatic side, filled me
for the first time with the flattering warmth of emotion roused by the
consciousness of being understood by another mind in full sympathy with
Page 455
my own. At the same time I was able, in spite of my dreamy condition, to
observe critically the standard of capacity exhibited by the singers and their
chorus-master. After the rehearsal I, together with the musical director,
Stohr, and Götze the singer, accepted Liszt’s invitation to a simple dinner, at
a different inn from the one where he lived. I thus had occasion to take
alarm at a trait in his character which was entirely new to me. After being
stirred up to a certain pitch of excitement his mood became positively
alarming, and he almost gnashed his teeth in a passion of fury directed
against a certain section of society which had also aroused my deepest
indignation. I was strongly affected by this strange experience with this
wonderful man, but I was unable to see the association of ideas which had
led to his terrible outburst. I was therefore left in a state of amazement,
while Liszt had to recover during the night from a violent attack of nerves
which his excitement had produced. Another surprise was in store for me
the next morning, when I found my friend fully equipped for a journey to
Karlsruhe—the circumstances which made it necessary being absolutely
incomprehensible to me. Liszt invited Director Stohr and myself to
accompany him as far as Eisenach. On our way there we were stopped by
Beaulieu, the Lord Chamberlain, who wished to know whether I was
prepared to be received by the Grand Duchess of Weimar, a sister of the
Emperor Nicolas, at Eisenach castle. As my excuse on the score of
unsuitable travelling costume was not admitted, Liszt accepted in my name,
and I really met with a surprisingly kind reception that evening from the
Grand Duchess, who chatted with me in the friendliest way, and introduced
me to her chamberlain with all due ceremony. Liszt maintained afterwards
that his noble patroness had been informed that I should be wanted by the
authorities in Dresden within the next few days, and had therefore hastened
to make my personal acquaintance at once, knowing that it would
compromise her too heavily later on.
Liszt continued his journey from Eisenach, leaving me to be entertained
and looked after by Stohr and the musical director Kuhmstedt, a diligent
and skilful master of counterpoint with whom I paid my first visit to the
Wartburg, which had not then been restored. I was filled with strange
musings as to my fate when I visited this castle. Here I was actually on the
point of entering, for the first time, the building which was so full of
meaning for me; here, too, I had to tell myself that the days of my further
sojourn in Germany were numbered. And in fact the news from Dresden,
observe critically the standard of capacity exhibited by the singers and their
chorus-master. After the rehearsal I, together with the musical director,
Stohr, and Götze the singer, accepted Liszt’s invitation to a simple dinner, at
a different inn from the one where he lived. I thus had occasion to take
alarm at a trait in his character which was entirely new to me. After being
stirred up to a certain pitch of excitement his mood became positively
alarming, and he almost gnashed his teeth in a passion of fury directed
against a certain section of society which had also aroused my deepest
indignation. I was strongly affected by this strange experience with this
wonderful man, but I was unable to see the association of ideas which had
led to his terrible outburst. I was therefore left in a state of amazement,
while Liszt had to recover during the night from a violent attack of nerves
which his excitement had produced. Another surprise was in store for me
the next morning, when I found my friend fully equipped for a journey to
Karlsruhe—the circumstances which made it necessary being absolutely
incomprehensible to me. Liszt invited Director Stohr and myself to
accompany him as far as Eisenach. On our way there we were stopped by
Beaulieu, the Lord Chamberlain, who wished to know whether I was
prepared to be received by the Grand Duchess of Weimar, a sister of the
Emperor Nicolas, at Eisenach castle. As my excuse on the score of
unsuitable travelling costume was not admitted, Liszt accepted in my name,
and I really met with a surprisingly kind reception that evening from the
Grand Duchess, who chatted with me in the friendliest way, and introduced
me to her chamberlain with all due ceremony. Liszt maintained afterwards
that his noble patroness had been informed that I should be wanted by the
authorities in Dresden within the next few days, and had therefore hastened
to make my personal acquaintance at once, knowing that it would
compromise her too heavily later on.
Liszt continued his journey from Eisenach, leaving me to be entertained
and looked after by Stohr and the musical director Kuhmstedt, a diligent
and skilful master of counterpoint with whom I paid my first visit to the
Wartburg, which had not then been restored. I was filled with strange
musings as to my fate when I visited this castle. Here I was actually on the
point of entering, for the first time, the building which was so full of
meaning for me; here, too, I had to tell myself that the days of my further
sojourn in Germany were numbered. And in fact the news from Dresden,
Page 456
when we returned to Weimar the next day, was serious indeed. Liszt, on his
return on the third day, found a letter from my wife, who had not dared to
write direct to me. She reported that the police had searched my house in
Dresden, to which she had returned, and that she had, moreover been
warned on no account to allow me to return to that city, as a warrant had
been taken out against me, and I was shortly to be served with a writ and
arrested. Liszt, who was now solely concerned for my personal safety,
called in a friend who had some experience of law, to consider what should
be done to rescue me from the danger that threatened me. Von Watzdorf, the
minister whom I had already visited, had been of opinion that I should, if
required, submit quietly to being taken to Dresden, and that the journey
would be made in a respectable private carriage. On the other hand, reports
which had reached us of the brutal way in which the Prussian troops in
Dresden had gone to work in applying the state of siege were of so alarming
a nature that Liszt and his friends in council urged my speedy departure
from Weimar, where it would be impossible to protect me. But I insisted on
taking leave of my wife, whose anxiety was great, before leaving Germany,
and begged to be allowed to stay a little longer at least in the
neighbourhood of Weimar. This was taken into consideration, and Professor
Siebert suggested my taking temporary shelter with a friendly steward at the
village of Magdala, which was three hours distant. I drove there the
following morning to introduce myself to this kind steward and protector as
Professor Werder from Berlin, who, with a letter of recommendation from
Professor Siebert, had come to turn his financial studies to practical account
in helping to administer these estates. Here in rural seclusion I spent three
days, entertainment of a peculiar nature being provided by the meeting of a
popular assembly, which consisted of the remainder of the contingent of
revolutionaries which had marched off towards Dresden and had now
returned in disorder. I listened with curious feelings, amounting almost to
contempt, to the speeches on this occasion, which were of every kind and
description. On the second day of my stay my host’s wife came back from
Weimar (where it was market-day) full of a curious tale: the composer of an
opera which was being performed there on that very day had been obliged
to leave Weimar suddenly because the warrant for his arrest had arrived
from Dresden. My host, who had been let into my secret by Professor
Seibert, asked playfully what his name was. As his wife did not seem to
return on the third day, found a letter from my wife, who had not dared to
write direct to me. She reported that the police had searched my house in
Dresden, to which she had returned, and that she had, moreover been
warned on no account to allow me to return to that city, as a warrant had
been taken out against me, and I was shortly to be served with a writ and
arrested. Liszt, who was now solely concerned for my personal safety,
called in a friend who had some experience of law, to consider what should
be done to rescue me from the danger that threatened me. Von Watzdorf, the
minister whom I had already visited, had been of opinion that I should, if
required, submit quietly to being taken to Dresden, and that the journey
would be made in a respectable private carriage. On the other hand, reports
which had reached us of the brutal way in which the Prussian troops in
Dresden had gone to work in applying the state of siege were of so alarming
a nature that Liszt and his friends in council urged my speedy departure
from Weimar, where it would be impossible to protect me. But I insisted on
taking leave of my wife, whose anxiety was great, before leaving Germany,
and begged to be allowed to stay a little longer at least in the
neighbourhood of Weimar. This was taken into consideration, and Professor
Siebert suggested my taking temporary shelter with a friendly steward at the
village of Magdala, which was three hours distant. I drove there the
following morning to introduce myself to this kind steward and protector as
Professor Werder from Berlin, who, with a letter of recommendation from
Professor Siebert, had come to turn his financial studies to practical account
in helping to administer these estates. Here in rural seclusion I spent three
days, entertainment of a peculiar nature being provided by the meeting of a
popular assembly, which consisted of the remainder of the contingent of
revolutionaries which had marched off towards Dresden and had now
returned in disorder. I listened with curious feelings, amounting almost to
contempt, to the speeches on this occasion, which were of every kind and
description. On the second day of my stay my host’s wife came back from
Weimar (where it was market-day) full of a curious tale: the composer of an
opera which was being performed there on that very day had been obliged
to leave Weimar suddenly because the warrant for his arrest had arrived
from Dresden. My host, who had been let into my secret by Professor
Seibert, asked playfully what his name was. As his wife did not seem to
Page 457
know, he came to her assistance with the suggestion that perhaps it was
Röckel whose name was familiar at Weimar.
‘Yes,’ she said, ‘Röckel, that was his name, quite right.’
My host laughed loudly, and said that he would not be so stupid as to let
them catch him, in spite of his opera.
At last, on 22nd May, my birthday, Minna actually arrived at Magdala.
She had hastened to Weimar on receiving my letter, and had proceeded
from there according to instructions, bent on persuading me at all costs to
flee the country immediately and for good. No attempt to raise her to the
level of my own mood was successful; she persisted in regarding me as an
ill-advised, inconsiderate person who had plunged both himself and her into
the most terrible situation. It had been arranged that I should meet her the
next evening in the house of Professor Wolff at Jena to take a last farewell.
She was to go by way of Weimar, while I took the footpath from Magdala. I
started accordingly on my walk of about six hours, and came over the
plateau into the little university town (which now received me hospitably
for the first time) at sunset. I found my wife again at the house of Professor
Wolff, who, thanks to Liszt, was already my friend, and with the addition of
a certain Professor Widmann another conference was held on the subject of
my further escape. A writ was actually out against me for being strongly
suspected of participation in the Dresden rising, and I could not under any
circumstances depend on a safe refuge in any of the German federal states.
Liszt insisted on my going to Paris, where I could find a new field for my
work, while Widmann advised me not to go by the direct route through
Frankfort and Baden, as the rising was still in full swing there, and the
police would certainly exercise praiseworthy vigilance over incoming
travellers with suspicious-looking passports. The way through Bavaria
would be the safest, as all was quiet there again; I could then make for
Switzerland, and the journey to Paris from there could be engineered
without any danger. As I needed a passport for the journey, Professor
Widmann offered me his own, which had been issued at Tubingen and had
not been brought up to date. My wife was quite in despair, and the parting
from her caused me real pain. I set off in the mail-coach and travelled,
without further hindrance, through many towns (amongst them Rudolstadt,
a place full of memories for me) to the Bavarian frontier. From there I
continued my journey by mail-coach straight to Lindau. At the gates I,
Röckel whose name was familiar at Weimar.
‘Yes,’ she said, ‘Röckel, that was his name, quite right.’
My host laughed loudly, and said that he would not be so stupid as to let
them catch him, in spite of his opera.
At last, on 22nd May, my birthday, Minna actually arrived at Magdala.
She had hastened to Weimar on receiving my letter, and had proceeded
from there according to instructions, bent on persuading me at all costs to
flee the country immediately and for good. No attempt to raise her to the
level of my own mood was successful; she persisted in regarding me as an
ill-advised, inconsiderate person who had plunged both himself and her into
the most terrible situation. It had been arranged that I should meet her the
next evening in the house of Professor Wolff at Jena to take a last farewell.
She was to go by way of Weimar, while I took the footpath from Magdala. I
started accordingly on my walk of about six hours, and came over the
plateau into the little university town (which now received me hospitably
for the first time) at sunset. I found my wife again at the house of Professor
Wolff, who, thanks to Liszt, was already my friend, and with the addition of
a certain Professor Widmann another conference was held on the subject of
my further escape. A writ was actually out against me for being strongly
suspected of participation in the Dresden rising, and I could not under any
circumstances depend on a safe refuge in any of the German federal states.
Liszt insisted on my going to Paris, where I could find a new field for my
work, while Widmann advised me not to go by the direct route through
Frankfort and Baden, as the rising was still in full swing there, and the
police would certainly exercise praiseworthy vigilance over incoming
travellers with suspicious-looking passports. The way through Bavaria
would be the safest, as all was quiet there again; I could then make for
Switzerland, and the journey to Paris from there could be engineered
without any danger. As I needed a passport for the journey, Professor
Widmann offered me his own, which had been issued at Tubingen and had
not been brought up to date. My wife was quite in despair, and the parting
from her caused me real pain. I set off in the mail-coach and travelled,
without further hindrance, through many towns (amongst them Rudolstadt,
a place full of memories for me) to the Bavarian frontier. From there I
continued my journey by mail-coach straight to Lindau. At the gates I,
Page 458
together with the other passengers, was asked for my passport. I passed the
night in a state of strange, feverish excitement, which lasted until the
departure of the steamer on Lake Constance early in the morning. My mind
was full of the Swabian dialect, as spoken by Professor Widmann, with
whose passport I was travelling. I pictured to myself my dealings with the
Bavarian police should I have to converse with them in accordance with the
above-mentioned irregularities in that document. A prey to feverish unrest, I
spent the whole night trying to perfect myself in the Swabian dialect, but, as
I was amused to find, without the smallest success. I had braced myself to
meet the crucial moment early the next morning, when the policeman came
into my room and, not knowing to whom the passports belonged, gave me
three at random to choose from. With joy in my heart I seized my own, and
dismissed the dreaded messenger in the most friendly way. Once on board
the steamer I realised with true satisfaction that I had now stepped on to
Swiss territory. It was a lovely spring morning; across the broad lake I
could gaze at the Alpine landscape as it spread itself before my eyes. When
I stepped on to Republican soil at Rorschach, I employed the first moments
in writing a few lines home to tell of my safe arrival in Switzerland and my
deliverance from all danger. The coach drive through the pleasant country
of St. Gall to Zürich cheered me up wonderfully, and when I drove down
from Oberstrass into Zürich that evening, the last day in May, at six
o’clock, and saw for the first time the Glarner Alps that encircle the lake
gleaming in the sunset, I at once resolved, though without being fully
conscious of it, to avoid everything that could prevent my settling here.
I had been the more willing to accept my friends’ suggestion to take the
Swiss route to Paris, as I knew I should find an old acquaintance, Alexander
Muller, at Zürich. I hoped with his help to obtain a passport to France, as I
was anxious not to arrive there as a political refugee. I had been on very
friendly terms with Muller once upon a time at Wurzburg. He had been
settled at Zürich for a long time as a teacher of music; this I learned from a
pupil of his, Wilhelm Baumgartner, who had called on me in Dresden some
years back to bring me a greeting from this old friend. On that occasion I
entrusted the pupil with a copy of the score of Tannhäuser for his master, by
way of remembrance, and this kind attention had not fallen on barren soil:
Muller and Baumgartner, whom I visited forthwith, introduced me at once
to Jacob Sulzer and Franz Hagenbuch, two cantonal secretaries who were
the most likely, among all their good friends, to compass the immediate
night in a state of strange, feverish excitement, which lasted until the
departure of the steamer on Lake Constance early in the morning. My mind
was full of the Swabian dialect, as spoken by Professor Widmann, with
whose passport I was travelling. I pictured to myself my dealings with the
Bavarian police should I have to converse with them in accordance with the
above-mentioned irregularities in that document. A prey to feverish unrest, I
spent the whole night trying to perfect myself in the Swabian dialect, but, as
I was amused to find, without the smallest success. I had braced myself to
meet the crucial moment early the next morning, when the policeman came
into my room and, not knowing to whom the passports belonged, gave me
three at random to choose from. With joy in my heart I seized my own, and
dismissed the dreaded messenger in the most friendly way. Once on board
the steamer I realised with true satisfaction that I had now stepped on to
Swiss territory. It was a lovely spring morning; across the broad lake I
could gaze at the Alpine landscape as it spread itself before my eyes. When
I stepped on to Republican soil at Rorschach, I employed the first moments
in writing a few lines home to tell of my safe arrival in Switzerland and my
deliverance from all danger. The coach drive through the pleasant country
of St. Gall to Zürich cheered me up wonderfully, and when I drove down
from Oberstrass into Zürich that evening, the last day in May, at six
o’clock, and saw for the first time the Glarner Alps that encircle the lake
gleaming in the sunset, I at once resolved, though without being fully
conscious of it, to avoid everything that could prevent my settling here.
I had been the more willing to accept my friends’ suggestion to take the
Swiss route to Paris, as I knew I should find an old acquaintance, Alexander
Muller, at Zürich. I hoped with his help to obtain a passport to France, as I
was anxious not to arrive there as a political refugee. I had been on very
friendly terms with Muller once upon a time at Wurzburg. He had been
settled at Zürich for a long time as a teacher of music; this I learned from a
pupil of his, Wilhelm Baumgartner, who had called on me in Dresden some
years back to bring me a greeting from this old friend. On that occasion I
entrusted the pupil with a copy of the score of Tannhäuser for his master, by
way of remembrance, and this kind attention had not fallen on barren soil:
Muller and Baumgartner, whom I visited forthwith, introduced me at once
to Jacob Sulzer and Franz Hagenbuch, two cantonal secretaries who were
the most likely, among all their good friends, to compass the immediate
Page 459
fulfilment of my desire. These two people, who had been joined by a few
intimates, received me with such respectful curiosity and sympathy that I
felt at home with them at once. The great assurance and moderation with
which they commented on the persecutions which had overtaken me, as
seen from their usual simple republican standpoint, opened to me a
conception of civil life which seemed to lift me to an entirely new sphere. I
felt so safe and protected here, whereas in my own country I had, without
quite realising it, come to be considered a criminal owing to the peculiar
connection between my disgust at the public attitude towards art and the
general political disturbances. To prepossess the two secretaries entirely in
my favour (one of them, Sulzer, had enjoyed an excellent classical
education), my friends arranged a meeting one evening at which I was to
read my poem on the Death of Siegfried. I am prepared to swear that I
never had more attentive listeners, among men, than on that evening. The
immediate effect of my success was the drawing up of a fully valid federal
passport for the poor German under warrant of arrest, armed with which I
started gaily on my journey to Paris after quite a short stay at Zürich. From
Strassburg, where I was enthralled by the fascination of the world-famous
minster, I travelled towards Paris by what was then the best means of
locomotion, the so-called malle-poste. I remember a remarkable
phenomenon in connection with this conveyance. Till then the noise of the
cannonade and musketry in the fighting at Dresden had been persistently re-
echoing in my ears, especially in a half-waking condition; now the
humming of the wheels, as we rolled rapidly along the highroad, cast such a
spell upon me that for the whole of the journey I seemed to hear the melody
of Freude, schöner Götterfunken[17] from the Ninth Symphony being played,
as it were, on deep bass instruments.
[17] See note on page 486.
From the time of my entering Switzerland till my arrival in Paris my
spirits, which had sunk into a dreamlike apathy, rose gradually to a level of
freedom and comfort that I had never enjoyed before. I felt like a bird in the
air whose destiny is not to founder in a morass; but soon after my arrival in
Paris, in the first week of June, a very palpable reaction set in. I had had an
introduction from Liszt to his former secretary Belloni, who felt it his duty,
in loyalty to the instructions received, to put me into communication with a
literary man, a certain Gustave Vaisse, with the object of being
intimates, received me with such respectful curiosity and sympathy that I
felt at home with them at once. The great assurance and moderation with
which they commented on the persecutions which had overtaken me, as
seen from their usual simple republican standpoint, opened to me a
conception of civil life which seemed to lift me to an entirely new sphere. I
felt so safe and protected here, whereas in my own country I had, without
quite realising it, come to be considered a criminal owing to the peculiar
connection between my disgust at the public attitude towards art and the
general political disturbances. To prepossess the two secretaries entirely in
my favour (one of them, Sulzer, had enjoyed an excellent classical
education), my friends arranged a meeting one evening at which I was to
read my poem on the Death of Siegfried. I am prepared to swear that I
never had more attentive listeners, among men, than on that evening. The
immediate effect of my success was the drawing up of a fully valid federal
passport for the poor German under warrant of arrest, armed with which I
started gaily on my journey to Paris after quite a short stay at Zürich. From
Strassburg, where I was enthralled by the fascination of the world-famous
minster, I travelled towards Paris by what was then the best means of
locomotion, the so-called malle-poste. I remember a remarkable
phenomenon in connection with this conveyance. Till then the noise of the
cannonade and musketry in the fighting at Dresden had been persistently re-
echoing in my ears, especially in a half-waking condition; now the
humming of the wheels, as we rolled rapidly along the highroad, cast such a
spell upon me that for the whole of the journey I seemed to hear the melody
of Freude, schöner Götterfunken[17] from the Ninth Symphony being played,
as it were, on deep bass instruments.
[17] See note on page 486.
From the time of my entering Switzerland till my arrival in Paris my
spirits, which had sunk into a dreamlike apathy, rose gradually to a level of
freedom and comfort that I had never enjoyed before. I felt like a bird in the
air whose destiny is not to founder in a morass; but soon after my arrival in
Paris, in the first week of June, a very palpable reaction set in. I had had an
introduction from Liszt to his former secretary Belloni, who felt it his duty,
in loyalty to the instructions received, to put me into communication with a
literary man, a certain Gustave Vaisse, with the object of being
Page 460
commissioned to write an opera libretto for production in Paris. I did not,
however, make the personal acquaintance of Vaisse. The idea did not please
me, and I found sufficient excuse for warding off the negotiations by saying
I was afraid of the epidemic of cholera which was said to be raging in the
city. I was staying in the Rue Notre Dame de Lorette for the sake of being
near Belloni. Through this street funeral processions, announced by the
muffled drum boats of the National Guard, passed practically every hour.
Though the heat was stifling, I was strictly forbidden to touch water, and
was advised to exercise the greatest precaution with regard to diet in every
respect. Besides this weight of uneasiness on my spirits, the whole outward
aspect of Paris, as it then appeared, had the most depressing effect on me.
The motto, liberte, egalite, fraternite was still to be seen on all the public
buildings and other establishments, but, on the other hand, I was alarmed at
seeing the first garcons caissiers making their way from the bank with their
long money-sacks over their shoulders and their large portfolios in their
hands. I had never met them so frequently as now, just when the old
capitalist regime, after its triumphant struggle against the once dreaded
socialist propaganda, was exerting itself vigorously to regain the public
confidence by its almost insulting pomp. I had gone, as it were,
mechanically into Schlesinger’s music-shop, where a successor was now
installed—a much more pronounced type of Jew named Brandus, of a very
dirty appearance. The only person there to give me a friendly welcome was
the old clerk, Monsieur Henri. After I had talked to him in loud tones for
some time, as the shop was apparently empty, he at length asked me with
some embarrassment whether I had not seen my master (votre maître)
Meyerbeer.
‘Is Monsieur Meyerbeer here?’ I asked.
‘Certainly,’ was the even more embarrassed reply; ‘quite near, over there
behind the desk.’
And, sure enough, as I walked across to the desk Meyerbeer came out,
covered with confusion. He smiled and made some excuse about pressing
proof-sheets. He had been hiding there quietly for over ten minutes since
first hearing my voice. I had had enough after my strange encounter with
this apparition. It recalled so many things affecting myself which reflected
suspicion on the man, in particular the significance of his behaviour
towards me in Berlin on the last occasion. However, as I had now nothing
however, make the personal acquaintance of Vaisse. The idea did not please
me, and I found sufficient excuse for warding off the negotiations by saying
I was afraid of the epidemic of cholera which was said to be raging in the
city. I was staying in the Rue Notre Dame de Lorette for the sake of being
near Belloni. Through this street funeral processions, announced by the
muffled drum boats of the National Guard, passed practically every hour.
Though the heat was stifling, I was strictly forbidden to touch water, and
was advised to exercise the greatest precaution with regard to diet in every
respect. Besides this weight of uneasiness on my spirits, the whole outward
aspect of Paris, as it then appeared, had the most depressing effect on me.
The motto, liberte, egalite, fraternite was still to be seen on all the public
buildings and other establishments, but, on the other hand, I was alarmed at
seeing the first garcons caissiers making their way from the bank with their
long money-sacks over their shoulders and their large portfolios in their
hands. I had never met them so frequently as now, just when the old
capitalist regime, after its triumphant struggle against the once dreaded
socialist propaganda, was exerting itself vigorously to regain the public
confidence by its almost insulting pomp. I had gone, as it were,
mechanically into Schlesinger’s music-shop, where a successor was now
installed—a much more pronounced type of Jew named Brandus, of a very
dirty appearance. The only person there to give me a friendly welcome was
the old clerk, Monsieur Henri. After I had talked to him in loud tones for
some time, as the shop was apparently empty, he at length asked me with
some embarrassment whether I had not seen my master (votre maître)
Meyerbeer.
‘Is Monsieur Meyerbeer here?’ I asked.
‘Certainly,’ was the even more embarrassed reply; ‘quite near, over there
behind the desk.’
And, sure enough, as I walked across to the desk Meyerbeer came out,
covered with confusion. He smiled and made some excuse about pressing
proof-sheets. He had been hiding there quietly for over ten minutes since
first hearing my voice. I had had enough after my strange encounter with
this apparition. It recalled so many things affecting myself which reflected
suspicion on the man, in particular the significance of his behaviour
towards me in Berlin on the last occasion. However, as I had now nothing
Page 461
more to do with him, I greeted him with a certain easy gaiety induced by
the regret I felt at seeing his manifest confusion on becoming cognisant of
my arrival in Paris. He took it for granted that I should again seek my
fortune there, and seemed much surprised when I assured him, on the
contrary, that the idea of having any work there was odious to me.
‘But Liszt published such a brilliant article about you in the Journal des
Débats,’ he said.
‘Ah,’ I replied, ‘it really had not occurred to me that the enthusiastic
devotion of a friend should be regarded as a mutual speculation.’
‘But the article made a sensation. It is incredible that you should not seek
to make any profit out of it.’
This offensive meddlesomeness roused me to protest to Meyerbeer with
some violence that I was concerned with anything rather than with the
production of artistic work, particularly just at that time when the course of
events seemed to indicate that the whole world was undergoing a reaction.
‘But what do you expect to get out of the revolution?’ he replied. ‘Are
you going to write scores for the barricades?’
Whereupon I assured him that I was not thinking of writing any scores at
all. We parted, obviously without having arrived at a mutual understanding.
In the street I was also stopped by Moritz Schlesinger, who, being
equally under the influence of Liszt’s brilliant article, evidently considered
me a perfect prodigy. He too thought I must be counting on making a hit in
Paris, and was sure that I had a very good chance of doing so.
‘Will you undertake my business?’ I asked him. ‘I have no money. Do
you really think the performance of an opera by an unknown composer can
be anything but a matter of money?’
‘You are quite right,’ said Moritz, and left me on the spot.
I turned from these disagreeable encounters in the plague-stricken capital
of the world to inquire the fate of my Dresden companions, for some of
those with whom I was intimate had also reached Paris, when I called on
Desplechins, who had painted the scenery for Tannhäuser. I found Semper
there, who had, like myself, been deposited in this city. We met again with
no little pleasure, although we could not help smiling at our grotesque
situation. Semper had retired from the battle when the famous barricade,
which he in his capacity of architect kept under close observation, had been
the regret I felt at seeing his manifest confusion on becoming cognisant of
my arrival in Paris. He took it for granted that I should again seek my
fortune there, and seemed much surprised when I assured him, on the
contrary, that the idea of having any work there was odious to me.
‘But Liszt published such a brilliant article about you in the Journal des
Débats,’ he said.
‘Ah,’ I replied, ‘it really had not occurred to me that the enthusiastic
devotion of a friend should be regarded as a mutual speculation.’
‘But the article made a sensation. It is incredible that you should not seek
to make any profit out of it.’
This offensive meddlesomeness roused me to protest to Meyerbeer with
some violence that I was concerned with anything rather than with the
production of artistic work, particularly just at that time when the course of
events seemed to indicate that the whole world was undergoing a reaction.
‘But what do you expect to get out of the revolution?’ he replied. ‘Are
you going to write scores for the barricades?’
Whereupon I assured him that I was not thinking of writing any scores at
all. We parted, obviously without having arrived at a mutual understanding.
In the street I was also stopped by Moritz Schlesinger, who, being
equally under the influence of Liszt’s brilliant article, evidently considered
me a perfect prodigy. He too thought I must be counting on making a hit in
Paris, and was sure that I had a very good chance of doing so.
‘Will you undertake my business?’ I asked him. ‘I have no money. Do
you really think the performance of an opera by an unknown composer can
be anything but a matter of money?’
‘You are quite right,’ said Moritz, and left me on the spot.
I turned from these disagreeable encounters in the plague-stricken capital
of the world to inquire the fate of my Dresden companions, for some of
those with whom I was intimate had also reached Paris, when I called on
Desplechins, who had painted the scenery for Tannhäuser. I found Semper
there, who had, like myself, been deposited in this city. We met again with
no little pleasure, although we could not help smiling at our grotesque
situation. Semper had retired from the battle when the famous barricade,
which he in his capacity of architect kept under close observation, had been
Page 462
surrounded. (He thought it impossible for it to be captured.) All the same,
he considered that he had exposed himself quite sufficiently to make it state
of siege and were occupying Dresden. He considered himself lucky as a
native of Holstein to be dependent, not on the German, but on the Danish
government for a passport, as this had helped him to reach Paris without
difficulty. When I expressed my real and heartfelt regret at the turn of
affairs which had torn him from a professional undertaking on which he had
just started—the completion of the Dresden Museum—he refused to take it
too seriously, saying it had given him a great deal of worry. In spite of our
trying situation, it was with Semper that I spent the only bright hours of my
stay in Paris. We were soon joined by another refugee, young Heine, who
had once wished to paint my Lohengrin scenery. He had no qualms about
his future, for his master Desplechins was willing to give him employment.
I alone felt I had been pitched quite aimlessly into Paris. I had a passionate
desire to leave this cholera-laden, atmosphere, and Belloni offered me an
opportunity which I promptly and joyfully seized. He invited me to follow
himself and his family to a country place near La Ferte-sous-Jouarre, where
I could be refreshed by pure air and absolute quiet, and wait for a change
for the better in my position. I made the short journey to Rueil after another
week in Paris, and took for the time being a poor lodging (one room, built
with recesses) in the house of Monsieur Raphael, a wine merchant, close by
the village mairie where the Belloni family were staying. Here I waited
further developments. During the period when all news from Germany
ceased I tried to occupy myself as far as possible with reading. After going
through Proudhon’s writings, and in particular his De la propriete, in such a
manner as to glean comfort for my situation in curiously divers ways, I
entertained myself for a considerable time with Lamartine’s Histoire des
Girondins, a most alluring and attractive work. One day Belloni brought me
news of the unfortunate rising in Paris, which had been attempted on the
13th June by the Republicans under Ledru-Rollin against the provisional
government, which was then in the full tide of reaction. Great as was the
indignation with which the news was received by my host and the mayor of
the place (a relative of his, at whose table we ate our modest daily meal), it
made, on the whole, little impression on me, as my attention was still fixed
in great agitation on the events which were taking place on the Rhine, and
particularly on the grand-duchy of Baden, which had been made forfeit to a
provisional government. When, however, the news reached me from this
he considered that he had exposed himself quite sufficiently to make it state
of siege and were occupying Dresden. He considered himself lucky as a
native of Holstein to be dependent, not on the German, but on the Danish
government for a passport, as this had helped him to reach Paris without
difficulty. When I expressed my real and heartfelt regret at the turn of
affairs which had torn him from a professional undertaking on which he had
just started—the completion of the Dresden Museum—he refused to take it
too seriously, saying it had given him a great deal of worry. In spite of our
trying situation, it was with Semper that I spent the only bright hours of my
stay in Paris. We were soon joined by another refugee, young Heine, who
had once wished to paint my Lohengrin scenery. He had no qualms about
his future, for his master Desplechins was willing to give him employment.
I alone felt I had been pitched quite aimlessly into Paris. I had a passionate
desire to leave this cholera-laden, atmosphere, and Belloni offered me an
opportunity which I promptly and joyfully seized. He invited me to follow
himself and his family to a country place near La Ferte-sous-Jouarre, where
I could be refreshed by pure air and absolute quiet, and wait for a change
for the better in my position. I made the short journey to Rueil after another
week in Paris, and took for the time being a poor lodging (one room, built
with recesses) in the house of Monsieur Raphael, a wine merchant, close by
the village mairie where the Belloni family were staying. Here I waited
further developments. During the period when all news from Germany
ceased I tried to occupy myself as far as possible with reading. After going
through Proudhon’s writings, and in particular his De la propriete, in such a
manner as to glean comfort for my situation in curiously divers ways, I
entertained myself for a considerable time with Lamartine’s Histoire des
Girondins, a most alluring and attractive work. One day Belloni brought me
news of the unfortunate rising in Paris, which had been attempted on the
13th June by the Republicans under Ledru-Rollin against the provisional
government, which was then in the full tide of reaction. Great as was the
indignation with which the news was received by my host and the mayor of
the place (a relative of his, at whose table we ate our modest daily meal), it
made, on the whole, little impression on me, as my attention was still fixed
in great agitation on the events which were taking place on the Rhine, and
particularly on the grand-duchy of Baden, which had been made forfeit to a
provisional government. When, however, the news reached me from this
Page 463
quarter also that the Prussians had succeeded in subduing a movement
which had not at first seemed hopeless, I felt extraordinarily downcast.
I was compelled to consider my position carefully, and the necessity of
conquering my difficulties helped to allay the excitement to which I was a
prey. The letters from my Weimar friends, as well as those from my wife,
now brought me completely to my senses. The former expressed themselves
very curtly about my behaviour with regard to recent events. The opinion
was, that for the moment there would be nothing for me to do, and
especially not in Dresden, or at the grand-ducal court, ‘as one could not
very well knock at battered doors’; ‘on ne frappe pas a des portes
enfoncees’ (Princess von Wittgenstein to Belloni).
I did not know what to reply, for I had never dreamt of expecting
anything to come from their intervening on my behalf in that quarter;
consequently I was quite satisfied that they sent me temporarily financial
assistance. With this money I made up my mind to leave for Zürich and ask
Alex Muller to give me shelter for a while, as his house was sufficiently
large to accommodate a guest. My saddest moment came when, after a long
silence, I at last received a letter from my wife. She wrote that she could not
dream of living with me again; that after I had so unscrupulously thrown
away a connection and position, the like of which would never again
present itself to me, no woman could reasonably be expected to take any
further interest in my future enterprises.
I fully appreciated my wife’s unfortunate position; I could in no way
assist her, except by advising her to sell our Dresden furniture, and by
making an appeal on her behalf to my relatives in Leipzig.
Until then I had been able to think more lightly of the misery of her
position, simply because I had imagined her to be more deeply in sympathy
with what agitated me. Often during the recent extraordinary events I had
even believed that she understood my feelings. Now, however, she had
disillusioned me on this point: she could see in me no more than what the
public saw, and the one redeeming point of her severe judgment was that
she excused my behaviour on the score that I was reckless. After I had
begged Liszt to do what he could for my wife, I soon began to regard her
unexpected behaviour with more equanimity. In reply to her announcement
that she would not write to me again for the present, I said that I had also
resolved to spare her all further anxiety about my very doubtful fate, by
which had not at first seemed hopeless, I felt extraordinarily downcast.
I was compelled to consider my position carefully, and the necessity of
conquering my difficulties helped to allay the excitement to which I was a
prey. The letters from my Weimar friends, as well as those from my wife,
now brought me completely to my senses. The former expressed themselves
very curtly about my behaviour with regard to recent events. The opinion
was, that for the moment there would be nothing for me to do, and
especially not in Dresden, or at the grand-ducal court, ‘as one could not
very well knock at battered doors’; ‘on ne frappe pas a des portes
enfoncees’ (Princess von Wittgenstein to Belloni).
I did not know what to reply, for I had never dreamt of expecting
anything to come from their intervening on my behalf in that quarter;
consequently I was quite satisfied that they sent me temporarily financial
assistance. With this money I made up my mind to leave for Zürich and ask
Alex Muller to give me shelter for a while, as his house was sufficiently
large to accommodate a guest. My saddest moment came when, after a long
silence, I at last received a letter from my wife. She wrote that she could not
dream of living with me again; that after I had so unscrupulously thrown
away a connection and position, the like of which would never again
present itself to me, no woman could reasonably be expected to take any
further interest in my future enterprises.
I fully appreciated my wife’s unfortunate position; I could in no way
assist her, except by advising her to sell our Dresden furniture, and by
making an appeal on her behalf to my relatives in Leipzig.
Until then I had been able to think more lightly of the misery of her
position, simply because I had imagined her to be more deeply in sympathy
with what agitated me. Often during the recent extraordinary events I had
even believed that she understood my feelings. Now, however, she had
disillusioned me on this point: she could see in me no more than what the
public saw, and the one redeeming point of her severe judgment was that
she excused my behaviour on the score that I was reckless. After I had
begged Liszt to do what he could for my wife, I soon began to regard her
unexpected behaviour with more equanimity. In reply to her announcement
that she would not write to me again for the present, I said that I had also
resolved to spare her all further anxiety about my very doubtful fate, by
Page 464
ceasing from communicating with her. I surveyed the panorama of our long
years of association critically in my mind’s eye, beginning with that first
stormy year of our married life, that had been so full of sorrow. Our
youthful days of worry and care in Paris had undoubtedly been of benefit to
us both. The courage and patience with which she had faced our difficulties,
while I on my part had tried to end them by dint of hard work, had linked us
together with bonds of iron. Minna was rewarded for all these privations by
Dresden successes, and more especially by the highly enviable position I
had held there. Her position as wife of the conductor (Frau Kapellmeisterin)
had brought her the fulfilment of her dearest wishes, and all those things
which conspired to make my work in this official post so intolerable to me,
were to her no more than so many threats directed against her smug content.
The course I had adopted with regard to Tannhäuser had already made her
doubtful of my success at the theatres, and had robbed her of all courage
and confidence in our future. The more I deviated from the path which she
regarded as the only profitable one, due partly to the change of my views
(which I grew ever less willing to communicate to her), and partly to the
modification in my attitude towards the stage, the more she retreated from
that position of close fellowship with me which she had enjoyed in former
years, and which she thought herself justified in connecting in some way
with my successes.
She looked upon my conduct with regard to the Dresden catastrophe as
the outcome of this deviation from the right path, and attributed it to the
influence of unscrupulous persons (particularly the unfortunate Röckel),
who were supposed to have dragged me with them to ruin, by appealing to
my vanity. Deeper than all these disagreements, however, which, after all,
were concerned only with external circumstances, was the consciousness of
our fundamental incompatibility, which to me had become ever more and
more apparent since the day of our reconciliation. From the very beginning
we had had scenes of the most violent description: never once after these
frequent quarrels had she admitted herself in the wrong or tried to be friends
again.
The necessity of speedily restoring our domestic peace, as well as my
conviction (confirmed by every one of her extravagant outbursts) that, in
view of the great disparity of our characters and especially of our
educations, it devolved upon me to prevent such scenes by observing great
caution in my behaviour, always led me to take the entire blame for what
years of association critically in my mind’s eye, beginning with that first
stormy year of our married life, that had been so full of sorrow. Our
youthful days of worry and care in Paris had undoubtedly been of benefit to
us both. The courage and patience with which she had faced our difficulties,
while I on my part had tried to end them by dint of hard work, had linked us
together with bonds of iron. Minna was rewarded for all these privations by
Dresden successes, and more especially by the highly enviable position I
had held there. Her position as wife of the conductor (Frau Kapellmeisterin)
had brought her the fulfilment of her dearest wishes, and all those things
which conspired to make my work in this official post so intolerable to me,
were to her no more than so many threats directed against her smug content.
The course I had adopted with regard to Tannhäuser had already made her
doubtful of my success at the theatres, and had robbed her of all courage
and confidence in our future. The more I deviated from the path which she
regarded as the only profitable one, due partly to the change of my views
(which I grew ever less willing to communicate to her), and partly to the
modification in my attitude towards the stage, the more she retreated from
that position of close fellowship with me which she had enjoyed in former
years, and which she thought herself justified in connecting in some way
with my successes.
She looked upon my conduct with regard to the Dresden catastrophe as
the outcome of this deviation from the right path, and attributed it to the
influence of unscrupulous persons (particularly the unfortunate Röckel),
who were supposed to have dragged me with them to ruin, by appealing to
my vanity. Deeper than all these disagreements, however, which, after all,
were concerned only with external circumstances, was the consciousness of
our fundamental incompatibility, which to me had become ever more and
more apparent since the day of our reconciliation. From the very beginning
we had had scenes of the most violent description: never once after these
frequent quarrels had she admitted herself in the wrong or tried to be friends
again.
The necessity of speedily restoring our domestic peace, as well as my
conviction (confirmed by every one of her extravagant outbursts) that, in
view of the great disparity of our characters and especially of our
educations, it devolved upon me to prevent such scenes by observing great
caution in my behaviour, always led me to take the entire blame for what
Page 465
had happened upon myself, and to mollify Minna by showing her that I was
sorry. Unfortunately, and to my intense grief, I was forced to recognise that
by acting in this way I lost all my power over her affections, and especially
over her character. Now we stood in a position in which I could not possibly
resort to the same means of reconciliation, for it would have meant my
being inconsistent in all my views and actions. And then I found myself
confronted by such hardness in the woman whom I had spoilt by my
leniency, that it was out of the question to expect her to acknowledge the
injustice done to myself. Suffice it to say that the wreck of my married life
had contributed not inconsiderably to the ruin of my position in Dresden,
and to the careless manner in which I treated it, for instead of finding help,
strength, and consolation at home, I found my wife unwittingly conspiring
against me, in league with all the other hostile circumstances which then
beset me. After I had got over the first shock of her heartless behaviour, I
was absolutely clear about this. I remember that I did not suffer any great
sorrow, but that on the contrary, with the conviction of being now quite
helpless, an almost exalted calm came over me when I realised that up to
the present my life had been built on a foundation of sand and nothing
more. At all events, the fact that I stood absolutely alone did much towards
restoring my peace of mind, and in my distress I now found strength and
comfort even in the fact of my dire poverty. At last assistance arrived from
Weimar. I accepted it eagerly, and it was the means of extricating me from
my present useless life and stranded hopes.
My next move was to find a place of refuge—one, however, which had
but little attraction for me, seeing that in it there was not the slightest hope
of my being able to make any further headway in the paths along which I
had hitherto progressed. This refuge was Zürich, a town devoid of all art in
the public sense, and where for the first time I met simple-hearted people
who knew nothing about me as a musician, but who, as it appeared, felt
drawn towards me by the power of my personality alone. I arrived at
Muller’s house and asked him to let me have a room, at the same time
giving him what remained of my capital, namely twenty francs. I quickly
discovered that my old friend was embarrassed by my perfectly open
confidence in him, and that he was at his wit’s end to know what to do with
me. I soon gave up the large room containing a grand piano, which he had
allotted to me on the impulse of the moment, and retired to a modest little
bedroom. The meals were my great trial, not because I was fastidious, but
sorry. Unfortunately, and to my intense grief, I was forced to recognise that
by acting in this way I lost all my power over her affections, and especially
over her character. Now we stood in a position in which I could not possibly
resort to the same means of reconciliation, for it would have meant my
being inconsistent in all my views and actions. And then I found myself
confronted by such hardness in the woman whom I had spoilt by my
leniency, that it was out of the question to expect her to acknowledge the
injustice done to myself. Suffice it to say that the wreck of my married life
had contributed not inconsiderably to the ruin of my position in Dresden,
and to the careless manner in which I treated it, for instead of finding help,
strength, and consolation at home, I found my wife unwittingly conspiring
against me, in league with all the other hostile circumstances which then
beset me. After I had got over the first shock of her heartless behaviour, I
was absolutely clear about this. I remember that I did not suffer any great
sorrow, but that on the contrary, with the conviction of being now quite
helpless, an almost exalted calm came over me when I realised that up to
the present my life had been built on a foundation of sand and nothing
more. At all events, the fact that I stood absolutely alone did much towards
restoring my peace of mind, and in my distress I now found strength and
comfort even in the fact of my dire poverty. At last assistance arrived from
Weimar. I accepted it eagerly, and it was the means of extricating me from
my present useless life and stranded hopes.
My next move was to find a place of refuge—one, however, which had
but little attraction for me, seeing that in it there was not the slightest hope
of my being able to make any further headway in the paths along which I
had hitherto progressed. This refuge was Zürich, a town devoid of all art in
the public sense, and where for the first time I met simple-hearted people
who knew nothing about me as a musician, but who, as it appeared, felt
drawn towards me by the power of my personality alone. I arrived at
Muller’s house and asked him to let me have a room, at the same time
giving him what remained of my capital, namely twenty francs. I quickly
discovered that my old friend was embarrassed by my perfectly open
confidence in him, and that he was at his wit’s end to know what to do with
me. I soon gave up the large room containing a grand piano, which he had
allotted to me on the impulse of the moment, and retired to a modest little
bedroom. The meals were my great trial, not because I was fastidious, but
Page 466
because I could not digest thorn. Outside my friend’s house, on the contrary,
I enjoyed what, considering the habits of the locality, was the most
luxurious reception. The same young men who had been so kind to me on
my first journey through Zürich again showed themselves anxious to be
continually in my company, and this was especially the case with one young
fellow called Jakob Sulzer. He had to be thirty years of age before he was
entitled to become a member of the Zürich government, and he therefore
still had several years to wait. In spite of his youth, however, the impression
he made on all those with whom he came in contact was that of a man of
riper years, whose character was formed. When I was asked long afterwards
whether I had ever met a man who, morally speaking, was the beau-ideal of
real character and uprightness, I could, on reflection, think of none other
than this newly gained friend, Jakob Sulzer.
He owed his early appointment as permanent Cantonal Secretary
(Staatsschreiber), one of the most excellent government posts in the canton
of Zürich, to the recently returned liberal party, led by Alfred Escher. As
this party could not employ the more experienced members of the older
conservative side in the public offices, their policy was to choose
exceptionally gifted young men for these positions. Sulzer showed
extraordinary promise, and their choice accordingly soon lighted on him.
He had only just returned from the Berlin and Bonn universities with the
intention of establishing himself as professor of philology at the university
in his native town, when he was made a member of the new government. To
fit himself for his post he had to stay in Geneva for six months to perfect
himself in the French language, which he had neglected during his
philological studies. He was quick-witted and industrious, as well as
independent and firm, and he never allowed himself to be swayed by any
party tactics. Consequently he rose very rapidly to high positions in the
government, to which he rendered valuable and important services, first as
Minister of Finance, a post he held for many years, and later with particular
distinction as member of the School Federation. His unexpected
acquaintance with me seemed to place him in a sort of dilemma; from the
philological and classical studies which he had entered upon of his own
choice, he suddenly found himself torn away in the most bewildering
manner by this unexpected summons from the government. It almost
seemed as if his meeting with me had made him regret having accepted the
appointment. As he was a person of great culture, my poem, Siegfried’s
I enjoyed what, considering the habits of the locality, was the most
luxurious reception. The same young men who had been so kind to me on
my first journey through Zürich again showed themselves anxious to be
continually in my company, and this was especially the case with one young
fellow called Jakob Sulzer. He had to be thirty years of age before he was
entitled to become a member of the Zürich government, and he therefore
still had several years to wait. In spite of his youth, however, the impression
he made on all those with whom he came in contact was that of a man of
riper years, whose character was formed. When I was asked long afterwards
whether I had ever met a man who, morally speaking, was the beau-ideal of
real character and uprightness, I could, on reflection, think of none other
than this newly gained friend, Jakob Sulzer.
He owed his early appointment as permanent Cantonal Secretary
(Staatsschreiber), one of the most excellent government posts in the canton
of Zürich, to the recently returned liberal party, led by Alfred Escher. As
this party could not employ the more experienced members of the older
conservative side in the public offices, their policy was to choose
exceptionally gifted young men for these positions. Sulzer showed
extraordinary promise, and their choice accordingly soon lighted on him.
He had only just returned from the Berlin and Bonn universities with the
intention of establishing himself as professor of philology at the university
in his native town, when he was made a member of the new government. To
fit himself for his post he had to stay in Geneva for six months to perfect
himself in the French language, which he had neglected during his
philological studies. He was quick-witted and industrious, as well as
independent and firm, and he never allowed himself to be swayed by any
party tactics. Consequently he rose very rapidly to high positions in the
government, to which he rendered valuable and important services, first as
Minister of Finance, a post he held for many years, and later with particular
distinction as member of the School Federation. His unexpected
acquaintance with me seemed to place him in a sort of dilemma; from the
philological and classical studies which he had entered upon of his own
choice, he suddenly found himself torn away in the most bewildering
manner by this unexpected summons from the government. It almost
seemed as if his meeting with me had made him regret having accepted the
appointment. As he was a person of great culture, my poem, Siegfried’s
Page 467
Death, naturally revealed to him my knowledge of German antiquity. He
had also studied this subject, but with greater philological accuracy than I
could possibly have aspired to. When, later on, he became acquainted with
my manner of writing music, this peculiarly serious and reserved man
became so thoroughly interested in my sphere of art, so far removed from
his own field of labour, that, as he himself confessed, he felt it his duty to
fight against these disturbing influences by being intentionally brusque and
curt with me. In the beginning of my stay in Zürich, however, he delighted
in being led some distance astray in the realms of art. The old-fashioned
official residence of the first Cantonal Secretary was often the scene of
unique gatherings, composed of people such as I would be sure to attract. It
might even be said that these social functions occurred rather more
frequently than was advisable for the reputation of a civil servant of this
little philistine state. What attracted the musician Baumgartner more
particularly to these meetings was the product of Sulzer’s vineyards in
Winterthur, to which our hosts treated his guests with the greatest liberality.
When in my moods of mad exuberance I gave vent in dithyrambic effusions
to my most extreme views on art and life, my listeners often responded in a
manner which, more often than not, I was perfectly right in ascribing to the
effects of the wine rather than to the power of my enthusiasm. Once when
Professor Ettmuller, the Germanist and Edda scholar, had been invited to
listen to a reading of my Siegfried and had been led home in a state of
melancholy enthusiasm, there was a regular outburst of wanton spirits
among those who had remained behind. I conceived the absurd idea of
lifting all the doors of the state official’s house off their hinges.
Herr Hagenbuch, another servant of the state, seeing what exertion this
cost me, offered me the help of his gigantic physique, and with comparative
ease we succeeded in removing every single door, and laying it aside, a
proceeding at which Sulzer merely smiled good-naturedly. The next day,
however, when we made inquiries, he told us that the replacing of those
doors (which must have been a terrible strain on his delicate constitution)
had taken him the whole night, as he had made up his mind to keep the
knowledge of our orgies from the sergeant, who always arrived at a very
early hour in the morning.
The extraordinary birdlike freedom of my existence had the effect of
exciting me more and more. I was often frightened at the excessive
outbursts of exaltation to which I was prone—no matter whom I was with
had also studied this subject, but with greater philological accuracy than I
could possibly have aspired to. When, later on, he became acquainted with
my manner of writing music, this peculiarly serious and reserved man
became so thoroughly interested in my sphere of art, so far removed from
his own field of labour, that, as he himself confessed, he felt it his duty to
fight against these disturbing influences by being intentionally brusque and
curt with me. In the beginning of my stay in Zürich, however, he delighted
in being led some distance astray in the realms of art. The old-fashioned
official residence of the first Cantonal Secretary was often the scene of
unique gatherings, composed of people such as I would be sure to attract. It
might even be said that these social functions occurred rather more
frequently than was advisable for the reputation of a civil servant of this
little philistine state. What attracted the musician Baumgartner more
particularly to these meetings was the product of Sulzer’s vineyards in
Winterthur, to which our hosts treated his guests with the greatest liberality.
When in my moods of mad exuberance I gave vent in dithyrambic effusions
to my most extreme views on art and life, my listeners often responded in a
manner which, more often than not, I was perfectly right in ascribing to the
effects of the wine rather than to the power of my enthusiasm. Once when
Professor Ettmuller, the Germanist and Edda scholar, had been invited to
listen to a reading of my Siegfried and had been led home in a state of
melancholy enthusiasm, there was a regular outburst of wanton spirits
among those who had remained behind. I conceived the absurd idea of
lifting all the doors of the state official’s house off their hinges.
Herr Hagenbuch, another servant of the state, seeing what exertion this
cost me, offered me the help of his gigantic physique, and with comparative
ease we succeeded in removing every single door, and laying it aside, a
proceeding at which Sulzer merely smiled good-naturedly. The next day,
however, when we made inquiries, he told us that the replacing of those
doors (which must have been a terrible strain on his delicate constitution)
had taken him the whole night, as he had made up his mind to keep the
knowledge of our orgies from the sergeant, who always arrived at a very
early hour in the morning.
The extraordinary birdlike freedom of my existence had the effect of
exciting me more and more. I was often frightened at the excessive
outbursts of exaltation to which I was prone—no matter whom I was with
Page 468
—and which led me to indulge in the most extraordinary paradoxes in my
conversation. Soon after I had settled in Zürich I began to write down my
various ideas about things at which I had arrived through my private and
artistic experiences, as well as through the influence of the political unrest
of the day. As I had no choice but to try, to the best of my ability, to earn
something by my pen, I thought of sending a series of articles to a great
French journal such as the National, which in those days was still extant. In
these articles I meant to propound my ideas (in my revolutionary way) on
the subject of modern art in its relation to society. I sent six of them to an
elderly friend of mine, Albert Franck, requesting him to have them
translated into French and to get them published. This Franck was the
brother of the better-known Hermann Franck, now the head of the Franco-
German bookselling firm, which had originally belonged to my brother-in-
law, Avenarius. He sent me back my work with the very natural remark that
it was out of the question to expect the Parisian public to understand or
appreciate my articles, especially at such a critical moment.
I headed the manuscript Kunst und Revolution (‘Art and Revolution’)
and sent it to Otto Wigand in Leipzig, who actually undertook to publish it
in the form of a pamphlet, and sent me five louis d’or for it. This
unexpected success induced me to continue to exploit my literary gifts. I
looked among my papers for the essay I had written the year before as the
outcome of my historical studies of the ‘Nibelungen’ legend; I gave it the
title of Die Nibelungen Weltgeschichte aus der Sage, and again tried my
luck by sending it to Wigand.
The sensational title of Kunst und Revolution, as well as the notoriety the
‘royal conductor’ had gained as a political refugee, had made the radical
publisher hope that the scandal that would arise on the publication of my
articles would redound to his benefit! I soon discovered that he was on the
point of issuing a second edition of Kunst und Revolution, without,
however, informing me of the fact. He also took over my new pamphlet for
another five louis d’or. This was the first time I had earned money by means
of published work, and I now began to believe that I had reached that point
when I should be able to get the better of my misfortunes. I thought it over,
and decided to give public lectures in Zürich on subjects related to my
writings during the coming winter, hoping in that free and haphazard
fashion to keep body and soul together for a little while, although I had no
fixed appointment and did not intend to work at music.
conversation. Soon after I had settled in Zürich I began to write down my
various ideas about things at which I had arrived through my private and
artistic experiences, as well as through the influence of the political unrest
of the day. As I had no choice but to try, to the best of my ability, to earn
something by my pen, I thought of sending a series of articles to a great
French journal such as the National, which in those days was still extant. In
these articles I meant to propound my ideas (in my revolutionary way) on
the subject of modern art in its relation to society. I sent six of them to an
elderly friend of mine, Albert Franck, requesting him to have them
translated into French and to get them published. This Franck was the
brother of the better-known Hermann Franck, now the head of the Franco-
German bookselling firm, which had originally belonged to my brother-in-
law, Avenarius. He sent me back my work with the very natural remark that
it was out of the question to expect the Parisian public to understand or
appreciate my articles, especially at such a critical moment.
I headed the manuscript Kunst und Revolution (‘Art and Revolution’)
and sent it to Otto Wigand in Leipzig, who actually undertook to publish it
in the form of a pamphlet, and sent me five louis d’or for it. This
unexpected success induced me to continue to exploit my literary gifts. I
looked among my papers for the essay I had written the year before as the
outcome of my historical studies of the ‘Nibelungen’ legend; I gave it the
title of Die Nibelungen Weltgeschichte aus der Sage, and again tried my
luck by sending it to Wigand.
The sensational title of Kunst und Revolution, as well as the notoriety the
‘royal conductor’ had gained as a political refugee, had made the radical
publisher hope that the scandal that would arise on the publication of my
articles would redound to his benefit! I soon discovered that he was on the
point of issuing a second edition of Kunst und Revolution, without,
however, informing me of the fact. He also took over my new pamphlet for
another five louis d’or. This was the first time I had earned money by means
of published work, and I now began to believe that I had reached that point
when I should be able to get the better of my misfortunes. I thought it over,
and decided to give public lectures in Zürich on subjects related to my
writings during the coming winter, hoping in that free and haphazard
fashion to keep body and soul together for a little while, although I had no
fixed appointment and did not intend to work at music.
Page 469
It seemed necessary for me to resort to these means, as I did not know
how otherwise to keep myself alive. Shortly after my arrival in Zürich I had
witnessed the coming of the fragments of the Baden army, dispersed over
Swiss territory, and accompanied by fugitive volunteers, and this had made
a painful and uncanny impression upon me. The news of the surrender near
Villagos by Gorgey paralysed the last hopes as to the issue of the great
European struggle for liberty, which so far had been left quite undecided.
With some misgiving and anxiety I now turned my eyes from all these
occurrences in the outside world inwards to my own soul.
I was accustomed to patronise the cafe litteraire, where I took my coffee
after my heavy mid-day meal, in a smoky atmosphere surrounded by a
merry and joking throng of men playing dominoes and ‘fast.’ One day I
stared at its common wall-paper representing antique subjects, which in
some inexplicable way recalled a certain water-colour by Genelli to my
mind, portraying ‘The education of Dionysos by the Muses.’ I had seen it at
the house of my brother-in-law Brockhaus in my young days, and it had
made a deep impression on me at the time. At this same place I conceived
the first ideas of my Kunstwerk der Zukunft (‘The Art-Work of the Future’),
and it seemed a significant omen to me to be roused one day out of one of
my post-prandial dreams by the news that Schroder-Devrient was staying in
Zürich. I immediately got up with the intention of calling on her at the
neighbouring hotel, ‘Zum Schwerte,’ but to my great dismay heard that she
had just left by steamer. I never saw her again, and long afterwards only
heard of her painful death from my wife, who in later years became fairly
intimate with her in Dresden.
After I had spent two remarkable summer months in this wild and
extraordinary fashion, I at last received reassuring news of Minna, who had
remained in Dresden. Although her manner of taking leave of me had been
both harsh and wounding, I could not bring myself to believe I had
completely parted from her. In a letter I wrote to one of her relations, and
which I presumed they would forward, I made sympathetic inquiries about
her, while I had already done all that lay in my power, through repeated
appeals to Liszt, to ensure her being well cared for. I now received a direct
reply, which, in addition to the fact that it testified to the vigour and activity
with which she had fought her difficulties, at the same time showed me that
she earnestly desired to be reunited with me. It was almost in terms of
contempt that she expressed her grave doubts as to the possibility of my
how otherwise to keep myself alive. Shortly after my arrival in Zürich I had
witnessed the coming of the fragments of the Baden army, dispersed over
Swiss territory, and accompanied by fugitive volunteers, and this had made
a painful and uncanny impression upon me. The news of the surrender near
Villagos by Gorgey paralysed the last hopes as to the issue of the great
European struggle for liberty, which so far had been left quite undecided.
With some misgiving and anxiety I now turned my eyes from all these
occurrences in the outside world inwards to my own soul.
I was accustomed to patronise the cafe litteraire, where I took my coffee
after my heavy mid-day meal, in a smoky atmosphere surrounded by a
merry and joking throng of men playing dominoes and ‘fast.’ One day I
stared at its common wall-paper representing antique subjects, which in
some inexplicable way recalled a certain water-colour by Genelli to my
mind, portraying ‘The education of Dionysos by the Muses.’ I had seen it at
the house of my brother-in-law Brockhaus in my young days, and it had
made a deep impression on me at the time. At this same place I conceived
the first ideas of my Kunstwerk der Zukunft (‘The Art-Work of the Future’),
and it seemed a significant omen to me to be roused one day out of one of
my post-prandial dreams by the news that Schroder-Devrient was staying in
Zürich. I immediately got up with the intention of calling on her at the
neighbouring hotel, ‘Zum Schwerte,’ but to my great dismay heard that she
had just left by steamer. I never saw her again, and long afterwards only
heard of her painful death from my wife, who in later years became fairly
intimate with her in Dresden.
After I had spent two remarkable summer months in this wild and
extraordinary fashion, I at last received reassuring news of Minna, who had
remained in Dresden. Although her manner of taking leave of me had been
both harsh and wounding, I could not bring myself to believe I had
completely parted from her. In a letter I wrote to one of her relations, and
which I presumed they would forward, I made sympathetic inquiries about
her, while I had already done all that lay in my power, through repeated
appeals to Liszt, to ensure her being well cared for. I now received a direct
reply, which, in addition to the fact that it testified to the vigour and activity
with which she had fought her difficulties, at the same time showed me that
she earnestly desired to be reunited with me. It was almost in terms of
contempt that she expressed her grave doubts as to the possibility of my
Page 470
being able to make a living in Zürich, but she added that, inasmuch as she
was my wife, she wished to give me another chance. She also seemed to
take it for granted that I intended making Zürich only our temporary home,
and that I would do my utmost to promote my career as a composer of
opera in Paris. Whereupon she announced her intention of arriving at
Rorschach in Switzerland on a certain date in September of that year, in the
company of the little dog Peps, the parrot Papo, and her so-called sister
Nathalie. After having engaged two rooms for our new home, I now
prepared to set out on foot for St. Gall and Rorschach through the lovely
and celebrated Toggenburg and Appenzell, and felt very touched after all
when the peculiar family, which consisted half of pet animals, landed at the
harbour of Rorschach. I must honestly confess that the little dog and the
bird made me very happy. My wife at once threw cold water on my
emotions, however, by declaring that in the event of my behaving badly
again she was ready to return to Dresden any moment, and that she had
numerous friends there, who would be glad to protect and succour her if she
were forced to carry out her threat. Be this as it may, one look at her
convinced me how greatly she had aged in this short time, and how much I
ought to pity her, and this feeling succeeded in banishing all bitterness from
my heart.
I did my utmost to give her confidence and to make her believe that our
present misfortunes were but momentary. This was no easy task, as she
would constantly compare the diminutive aspect of the town of Zürich with
the more noble majesty of Dresden, and seemed to feel bitterly humiliated.
The friends whom I introduced to her found no favour in her eyes. She
looked upon the Cantonal Secretary, Sulzer, as a ‘mere town clerk who
would not be of any importance in. Germany’; and the wife of my host
Muller absolutely disgusted her when, in answer to Minna’s complaints
about my terrible position, she replied that my greatness lay in the very fact
of my having faced it. Then again Minna appeased me by tolling me of the
expected arrival of some of my Dresden belongings, which she thought
would be indispensable to our new home.
The property of which she spoke consisted of a Breitkopf and Hartel
grand-piano that looked better than it sounded, and of the ‘title-page’ of the
Nibelungen by Cornelius in a Gothic frame that used to hang over my desk
in Dresden.
was my wife, she wished to give me another chance. She also seemed to
take it for granted that I intended making Zürich only our temporary home,
and that I would do my utmost to promote my career as a composer of
opera in Paris. Whereupon she announced her intention of arriving at
Rorschach in Switzerland on a certain date in September of that year, in the
company of the little dog Peps, the parrot Papo, and her so-called sister
Nathalie. After having engaged two rooms for our new home, I now
prepared to set out on foot for St. Gall and Rorschach through the lovely
and celebrated Toggenburg and Appenzell, and felt very touched after all
when the peculiar family, which consisted half of pet animals, landed at the
harbour of Rorschach. I must honestly confess that the little dog and the
bird made me very happy. My wife at once threw cold water on my
emotions, however, by declaring that in the event of my behaving badly
again she was ready to return to Dresden any moment, and that she had
numerous friends there, who would be glad to protect and succour her if she
were forced to carry out her threat. Be this as it may, one look at her
convinced me how greatly she had aged in this short time, and how much I
ought to pity her, and this feeling succeeded in banishing all bitterness from
my heart.
I did my utmost to give her confidence and to make her believe that our
present misfortunes were but momentary. This was no easy task, as she
would constantly compare the diminutive aspect of the town of Zürich with
the more noble majesty of Dresden, and seemed to feel bitterly humiliated.
The friends whom I introduced to her found no favour in her eyes. She
looked upon the Cantonal Secretary, Sulzer, as a ‘mere town clerk who
would not be of any importance in. Germany’; and the wife of my host
Muller absolutely disgusted her when, in answer to Minna’s complaints
about my terrible position, she replied that my greatness lay in the very fact
of my having faced it. Then again Minna appeased me by tolling me of the
expected arrival of some of my Dresden belongings, which she thought
would be indispensable to our new home.
The property of which she spoke consisted of a Breitkopf and Hartel
grand-piano that looked better than it sounded, and of the ‘title-page’ of the
Nibelungen by Cornelius in a Gothic frame that used to hang over my desk
in Dresden.
Page 471
With this nucleus of household effects we now decided to take small
lodgings in the so-called ‘hinteren Escherhausern’ in the Zeltweg. With
great cleverness Minna had succeeded in selling the Dresden furniture to
advantage, and out of the proceeds of this sale she had brought three
hundred marks with her to Zürich to help towards setting up our new home.
She told me that she had saved my small but very select library for me by
giving it into the safe custody of the publisher, Heinrich Brockhaus (brother
of my sister’s husband and member of the Saxon Diet), who had insisted
upon looking after it. Great, therefore, was her dismay when, upon asking
this kind friend to send her the books, he replied that he was holding them
as security for a debt of fifteen hundred marks which I had contracted with
him during my days of trouble in Dresden, and that he intended to keep
them until that sum was returned. As even after the lapse of many years I
found it impossible to refund this money, these books, collected for my own
special wants, were lost to me for ever.
Thanks more particularly to my friend Sulzer, the Cantonal Secretary,
whom my wife at first despised so much on account of his title which she
misunderstood, and who, although he was far from well-off himself,
thought it only natural that he should help me, however moderately, out of
my difficulties, we soon succeeded in making our little place look so cosy
that my simple Zürich friends felt quite at home in it. My wife, with all her
undeniable talents, hero found ample scope in which to distinguish herself,
and I remember how ingeniously she made a little what-not out of the box
in which she had kindly brought my music and manuscript to Zürich.
But it was soon time to think of how to earn enough money to provide for
us all. My idea of giving public lectures was treated with contempt by my
wife, who looked upon it as an insult to her pride. She could acquiesce only
in one plan, that suggested by Liszt, namely, that I should write an opera for
Paris. To satisfy her, and in view of the fact that I could see no chance of a
remunerative occupation close at hand, I actually reopened a
correspondence on this matter with my great friend and his secretary
Belloni in Paris. In the meantime I could not be idle, so I accepted an
invitation from the Zürich musical society to conduct a classical
composition at one of their concerts, and to this end I worked with their
very poor orchestra at Beethoven’s Symphony in A major. Although the
result was successful, and I received five napoleons for my trouble, it made
my wife very unhappy, for she could not forget the excellent orchestra, and
lodgings in the so-called ‘hinteren Escherhausern’ in the Zeltweg. With
great cleverness Minna had succeeded in selling the Dresden furniture to
advantage, and out of the proceeds of this sale she had brought three
hundred marks with her to Zürich to help towards setting up our new home.
She told me that she had saved my small but very select library for me by
giving it into the safe custody of the publisher, Heinrich Brockhaus (brother
of my sister’s husband and member of the Saxon Diet), who had insisted
upon looking after it. Great, therefore, was her dismay when, upon asking
this kind friend to send her the books, he replied that he was holding them
as security for a debt of fifteen hundred marks which I had contracted with
him during my days of trouble in Dresden, and that he intended to keep
them until that sum was returned. As even after the lapse of many years I
found it impossible to refund this money, these books, collected for my own
special wants, were lost to me for ever.
Thanks more particularly to my friend Sulzer, the Cantonal Secretary,
whom my wife at first despised so much on account of his title which she
misunderstood, and who, although he was far from well-off himself,
thought it only natural that he should help me, however moderately, out of
my difficulties, we soon succeeded in making our little place look so cosy
that my simple Zürich friends felt quite at home in it. My wife, with all her
undeniable talents, hero found ample scope in which to distinguish herself,
and I remember how ingeniously she made a little what-not out of the box
in which she had kindly brought my music and manuscript to Zürich.
But it was soon time to think of how to earn enough money to provide for
us all. My idea of giving public lectures was treated with contempt by my
wife, who looked upon it as an insult to her pride. She could acquiesce only
in one plan, that suggested by Liszt, namely, that I should write an opera for
Paris. To satisfy her, and in view of the fact that I could see no chance of a
remunerative occupation close at hand, I actually reopened a
correspondence on this matter with my great friend and his secretary
Belloni in Paris. In the meantime I could not be idle, so I accepted an
invitation from the Zürich musical society to conduct a classical
composition at one of their concerts, and to this end I worked with their
very poor orchestra at Beethoven’s Symphony in A major. Although the
result was successful, and I received five napoleons for my trouble, it made
my wife very unhappy, for she could not forget the excellent orchestra, and
Page 472
the much more appreciative public, which a short time before in Dresden
would have seconded and rewarded similar efforts on my part. Her one and
only ideal for me was that, by hook or by crook, and with a total disregard
of all artistic scruples, I should make a brilliant reputation for myself in
Paris. While we were both absolutely at a loss to discover whence we
should obtain the necessary funds for our journey to Paris and our sojourn
there, I again plunged into my philosophical study of art, as being the only
sphere still left open to me.
Harrassed by the cares of a terrible struggle for existence, I wrote the
whole of Das Kunstwerk der Zukunft in the chilly atmosphere of a sunless
little room on the ground floor during the months of November and
December of that year. Minna had no objection to this occupation when I
told her of the success of my first pamphlet, and the hope I had of receiving
even better pay for this more extensive work.
Thus for a while I enjoyed comparative peace, although in my heart a
spirit of unrest had begun to reign, thanks to my growing acquaintance with
Feuerbach’s works. I had always had an inclination to fathom the depths of
philosophy, just as I had been led by the mystic influence of Beethoven’s
Ninth Symphony to search the deepest recesses of music. My first efforts at
satisfying this longing had failed. None of the Leipzig professors had
succeeded in fascinating me with their lectures on fundamental philosophy
and logic. I had procured Schelling’s work, Transcendental Idealism,
recommended to me by Gustav Schlesinger, a friend of Laube’s, but it was
in vain that I racked my brains to try and make something out of the first
pages, and I always returned to my Ninth Symphony.
During the latter part of my stay in Dresden I had returned to these old
studies, the longing for which suddenly revived within me, and to these I
added the deeper historical studies which had always fascinated me. As an
introduction to philosophy I now chose Hegel’s Philosophy of History. A
good deal of this impressed me deeply, and it now seemed as if I should
ultimately penetrate into the Holy of Holies along this path. The more
incomprehensible many of his speculative conclusions appeared, the more I
felt myself desirous of probing the question of the ‘Absolute’ and
everything connected therewith to the core. For I so admired Hegel’s
powerful mind that it seemed to me he was the very keystone of all
philosophical thought.
would have seconded and rewarded similar efforts on my part. Her one and
only ideal for me was that, by hook or by crook, and with a total disregard
of all artistic scruples, I should make a brilliant reputation for myself in
Paris. While we were both absolutely at a loss to discover whence we
should obtain the necessary funds for our journey to Paris and our sojourn
there, I again plunged into my philosophical study of art, as being the only
sphere still left open to me.
Harrassed by the cares of a terrible struggle for existence, I wrote the
whole of Das Kunstwerk der Zukunft in the chilly atmosphere of a sunless
little room on the ground floor during the months of November and
December of that year. Minna had no objection to this occupation when I
told her of the success of my first pamphlet, and the hope I had of receiving
even better pay for this more extensive work.
Thus for a while I enjoyed comparative peace, although in my heart a
spirit of unrest had begun to reign, thanks to my growing acquaintance with
Feuerbach’s works. I had always had an inclination to fathom the depths of
philosophy, just as I had been led by the mystic influence of Beethoven’s
Ninth Symphony to search the deepest recesses of music. My first efforts at
satisfying this longing had failed. None of the Leipzig professors had
succeeded in fascinating me with their lectures on fundamental philosophy
and logic. I had procured Schelling’s work, Transcendental Idealism,
recommended to me by Gustav Schlesinger, a friend of Laube’s, but it was
in vain that I racked my brains to try and make something out of the first
pages, and I always returned to my Ninth Symphony.
During the latter part of my stay in Dresden I had returned to these old
studies, the longing for which suddenly revived within me, and to these I
added the deeper historical studies which had always fascinated me. As an
introduction to philosophy I now chose Hegel’s Philosophy of History. A
good deal of this impressed me deeply, and it now seemed as if I should
ultimately penetrate into the Holy of Holies along this path. The more
incomprehensible many of his speculative conclusions appeared, the more I
felt myself desirous of probing the question of the ‘Absolute’ and
everything connected therewith to the core. For I so admired Hegel’s
powerful mind that it seemed to me he was the very keystone of all
philosophical thought.
Page 473
The revolution intervened; the practical tendencies of a social
reconstruction distracted my attention, and as I have already stated, it was a
German Catholic priest and political agitator (formerly a divinity student
named Menzdorff, who used to wear a Calabrian hat)[18] who drew my
attention to ‘the only real philosopher of modern times,’ Ludwig Feuerbach.
My new Zürich friend, the piano teacher, Wilhelm Baumgartner, made me a
present of Feuerbach’s book on Tod und Unsterblichkeit (‘Death and
Immortality’). The well-known and stirring lyrical style of the author
greatly fascinated me as a layman. The intricate questions which he
propounds in this book as if they were being discussed for the first time by
him, and which he treats in a charmingly exhaustive manner, had often
occupied my mind since the very first days of my acquaintance with Lehrs
in Paris, just as they occupy the mind of every imaginative and serious man.
With me, however, this was not lasting, and I had contented myself with the
poetic suggestions on these important subjects which appear here and there
in the works of our great poets.
[18] A broad-rimmed, tall, white felt hat, tapering to a point, originally worn by
the inhabitants of Calabria, and in 1848 a sign of Republicanism.—EDITOR.
The frankness with which Feuerbach explains his views on these
interesting questions, in the more mature parts of his book, pleased me as
much by their tragic as by their social-radical tendencies. It seemed right
that the only true immortality should be that of sublime deeds and great
works of art. It was more difficult to sustain any interest in Das Wesen des
Christenthums (‘The Essence of Christianity’) by the same author, for it
was impossible whilst reading this work not to become conscious, however
involuntarily, of the prolix and unskilful manner in which he dilates on the
simple and fundamental idea, namely, religion explained from a purely
subjective and psychological point of view. Nevertheless, from that day
onward I always regarded Feuerbach as the ideal exponent of the radical
release of the individual from the thraldom of accepted notions, founded on
the belief in authority. The initiated will therefore not wonder that I
dedicated my Kunstwerk der Zukunft to Feuerbach and addressed its
preface to him.
My friend Sulzer, a thorough disciple of Hegel, was very sorry to see me
so interested in Feuerbach, whom he did not even recognise as a
philosopher at all. He said that the best thing that Feuerbach had done for
reconstruction distracted my attention, and as I have already stated, it was a
German Catholic priest and political agitator (formerly a divinity student
named Menzdorff, who used to wear a Calabrian hat)[18] who drew my
attention to ‘the only real philosopher of modern times,’ Ludwig Feuerbach.
My new Zürich friend, the piano teacher, Wilhelm Baumgartner, made me a
present of Feuerbach’s book on Tod und Unsterblichkeit (‘Death and
Immortality’). The well-known and stirring lyrical style of the author
greatly fascinated me as a layman. The intricate questions which he
propounds in this book as if they were being discussed for the first time by
him, and which he treats in a charmingly exhaustive manner, had often
occupied my mind since the very first days of my acquaintance with Lehrs
in Paris, just as they occupy the mind of every imaginative and serious man.
With me, however, this was not lasting, and I had contented myself with the
poetic suggestions on these important subjects which appear here and there
in the works of our great poets.
[18] A broad-rimmed, tall, white felt hat, tapering to a point, originally worn by
the inhabitants of Calabria, and in 1848 a sign of Republicanism.—EDITOR.
The frankness with which Feuerbach explains his views on these
interesting questions, in the more mature parts of his book, pleased me as
much by their tragic as by their social-radical tendencies. It seemed right
that the only true immortality should be that of sublime deeds and great
works of art. It was more difficult to sustain any interest in Das Wesen des
Christenthums (‘The Essence of Christianity’) by the same author, for it
was impossible whilst reading this work not to become conscious, however
involuntarily, of the prolix and unskilful manner in which he dilates on the
simple and fundamental idea, namely, religion explained from a purely
subjective and psychological point of view. Nevertheless, from that day
onward I always regarded Feuerbach as the ideal exponent of the radical
release of the individual from the thraldom of accepted notions, founded on
the belief in authority. The initiated will therefore not wonder that I
dedicated my Kunstwerk der Zukunft to Feuerbach and addressed its
preface to him.
My friend Sulzer, a thorough disciple of Hegel, was very sorry to see me
so interested in Feuerbach, whom he did not even recognise as a
philosopher at all. He said that the best thing that Feuerbach had done for
Page 474
me was that he had been the means of awakening my ideas, although he
himself had none. But what had really induced me to attach so much
importance to Feuerbach was the conclusion by means of which he had
seceded from his master Hegel, to wit, that the best philosophy was to have
no philosophy—a theory which greatly simplified what I had formerly
considered a very terrifying study—and secondly, that only that was real
which could be ascertained by the senses.
The fact that he proclaimed what we call ‘spirit’ to be an aesthetic
perception of our senses, together with his statement concerning the futility
of philosophy—these were the two things in him which rendered me such
useful assistance in my conceptions of an all-embracing work of art, of a
perfect drama which should appeal to the simplest and most purely human
emotions at the very moment when it approached its fulfilment as
Kunstwerk der Zukunft. It must have been this which Sulzer had in his
mind when he spoke deprecatingly of Feuerbach’s influence over me. At all
events, after a while I certainly could not return to his works, and I
remember that his newly published book, Uber das Wesen der Religion
(‘Lectures on the Essence of Religion’), scared me to such an extent by the
dullness of its title alone, that when Herwegh opened it for my benefit, I
closed it with a bang under his very nose.
At that time I was working with great enthusiasm upon the draft of a
connected essay, and was delighted one day to receive a visit from the
novelist and Tieckian scholar, Eduard von Billow (the father of my young
friend Billow), who was passing through Zürich. In my tiny little room I
read him my chapter on poetry, and could not help noticing that he was
greatly startled at my ideas on literary drama and on the advent of the new
Shakespeare. I thought this all the more reason why Wigand the publisher
should accept my new revolutionary book, and expected him to pay me a
fee which would be in proportion to the greater size of the work. I asked for
twenty louis d’or, and this sum he agreed to pay me.
The prospect of receiving this amount induced me to carry out the plan,
which need had forced upon me, of travelling to Paris and of trying my luck
there as a composer of opera. This plan had very serious drawbacks; not
only did I hate the idea, but I knew that I was doing an injustice to myself
by believing in the success of my enterprise, for I felt that I could never
seriously throw myself into it heart and soul. Everything, however,
himself had none. But what had really induced me to attach so much
importance to Feuerbach was the conclusion by means of which he had
seceded from his master Hegel, to wit, that the best philosophy was to have
no philosophy—a theory which greatly simplified what I had formerly
considered a very terrifying study—and secondly, that only that was real
which could be ascertained by the senses.
The fact that he proclaimed what we call ‘spirit’ to be an aesthetic
perception of our senses, together with his statement concerning the futility
of philosophy—these were the two things in him which rendered me such
useful assistance in my conceptions of an all-embracing work of art, of a
perfect drama which should appeal to the simplest and most purely human
emotions at the very moment when it approached its fulfilment as
Kunstwerk der Zukunft. It must have been this which Sulzer had in his
mind when he spoke deprecatingly of Feuerbach’s influence over me. At all
events, after a while I certainly could not return to his works, and I
remember that his newly published book, Uber das Wesen der Religion
(‘Lectures on the Essence of Religion’), scared me to such an extent by the
dullness of its title alone, that when Herwegh opened it for my benefit, I
closed it with a bang under his very nose.
At that time I was working with great enthusiasm upon the draft of a
connected essay, and was delighted one day to receive a visit from the
novelist and Tieckian scholar, Eduard von Billow (the father of my young
friend Billow), who was passing through Zürich. In my tiny little room I
read him my chapter on poetry, and could not help noticing that he was
greatly startled at my ideas on literary drama and on the advent of the new
Shakespeare. I thought this all the more reason why Wigand the publisher
should accept my new revolutionary book, and expected him to pay me a
fee which would be in proportion to the greater size of the work. I asked for
twenty louis d’or, and this sum he agreed to pay me.
The prospect of receiving this amount induced me to carry out the plan,
which need had forced upon me, of travelling to Paris and of trying my luck
there as a composer of opera. This plan had very serious drawbacks; not
only did I hate the idea, but I knew that I was doing an injustice to myself
by believing in the success of my enterprise, for I felt that I could never
seriously throw myself into it heart and soul. Everything, however,
Page 475
combined to make me try the experiment, and it was Liszt in particular
who, confident of this being my only way to fame, insisted upon my
reopening the negotiations into which Belloni and I had entered during the
previous summer. To show with what earnestness I tried to consider the
chances of carrying out my plan, I drafted out the plot of the opera, which
the French poet would only have to put into verse, because I never for a
moment fancied that it would be possible for him to think out and write a
libretto for which I would only need to compose the music. I chose for my
subject the legend of Wieland der Schmied, upon which I commented with
some stress at the end of my recently finished Kunstwerk der Zukunft, and
the version of which by Simrock, taken from the Wilkyna legend, had
greatly attracted me.
I sketched out the complete scenario with precise indication of the
dialogue for three acts, and with a heavy heart decided to hand it over to my
Parisian author to be worked out. Liszt thought he saw a means of making
my music known through his relations with Seghers, the musical director of
a society then known as the ‘Concerts de St. Cecile.’ In January of the
following year the Tannhäuser Overture was to be given under his baton,
and it therefore seemed advisable that I should reach Paris some time before
this event. This undertaking, which appeared to be so difficult owing to my
complete lack of funds, was at last facilitated in a manner quite unexpected.
I had written home for help, and had appealed to all the old friends I
could think of, but in vain. By the family of my brother Albert in particular,
whose daughter had recently entered upon a brilliant theatrical career, I was
treated in much the same way as one treats an invalid by whom one dreads
to become infected. In contrast to their harshness I was deeply touched by
the devotion of the Ritter family, who had remained in Dresden; for, apart
from my acquaintance with young Karl, I scarcely knew these people at all.
Through the kindness of my old friend Heine, who had been informed of
my position, Frau Julie Ritter, the venerable mother of the family, had
thought it her duty to place, through a business friend, the sum of fifteen
hundred marks at my disposal. At about the same time I received a letter
from Mme. Laussot, who had called upon me in Dresden the year before,
and who now in the most affecting terms assured me of her continued
sympathy.
who, confident of this being my only way to fame, insisted upon my
reopening the negotiations into which Belloni and I had entered during the
previous summer. To show with what earnestness I tried to consider the
chances of carrying out my plan, I drafted out the plot of the opera, which
the French poet would only have to put into verse, because I never for a
moment fancied that it would be possible for him to think out and write a
libretto for which I would only need to compose the music. I chose for my
subject the legend of Wieland der Schmied, upon which I commented with
some stress at the end of my recently finished Kunstwerk der Zukunft, and
the version of which by Simrock, taken from the Wilkyna legend, had
greatly attracted me.
I sketched out the complete scenario with precise indication of the
dialogue for three acts, and with a heavy heart decided to hand it over to my
Parisian author to be worked out. Liszt thought he saw a means of making
my music known through his relations with Seghers, the musical director of
a society then known as the ‘Concerts de St. Cecile.’ In January of the
following year the Tannhäuser Overture was to be given under his baton,
and it therefore seemed advisable that I should reach Paris some time before
this event. This undertaking, which appeared to be so difficult owing to my
complete lack of funds, was at last facilitated in a manner quite unexpected.
I had written home for help, and had appealed to all the old friends I
could think of, but in vain. By the family of my brother Albert in particular,
whose daughter had recently entered upon a brilliant theatrical career, I was
treated in much the same way as one treats an invalid by whom one dreads
to become infected. In contrast to their harshness I was deeply touched by
the devotion of the Ritter family, who had remained in Dresden; for, apart
from my acquaintance with young Karl, I scarcely knew these people at all.
Through the kindness of my old friend Heine, who had been informed of
my position, Frau Julie Ritter, the venerable mother of the family, had
thought it her duty to place, through a business friend, the sum of fifteen
hundred marks at my disposal. At about the same time I received a letter
from Mme. Laussot, who had called upon me in Dresden the year before,
and who now in the most affecting terms assured me of her continued
sympathy.
Page 476
These were the first signs of that new phase in my life upon which I
entered from this day forth, and in which I accustomed myself to look upon
the outward circumstances of my existence as being merely subservient to
my will. And by this means I was able to escape from the hampering
narrowness of my home life.
For the moment the proffered financial assistance was very distasteful to
me, for it seemed to forbid my raising any further objections to the
realisation of the detested Paris schemes. When, however, on the strength of
this favourable change in my affairs, I suggested to my wife that we might,
after all, content ourselves with remaining in Zürich, she flew into the most
violent passion over my weakness and lack of spirit, and declared that if I
did not make up my mind to achieve something in Paris, she would lose all
faith in me. She said, moreover, that she absolutely refused to be a witness
of my misery and grief as a wretched literary man and insignificant
conductor of local concerts in Zürich.
We had entered upon the year 1850; I had decided to go to Paris, if only
for the sake of peace, but had to postpone my journey on account of ill-
health. The reaction following upon the terrible excitement of recent times
had not failed to have its effect on my overwrought nerves, and a state of
complete exhaustion had followed. The continual colds, in spite of which I
had been obliged to work in my very unhealthy room, had at last given rise
to alarming symptoms. A certain weakness of the chest became apparent,
and this the doctor (a political refugee) undertook to cure by the application
of pitch plasters. As the result of this treatment and the irritating effect it
had upon my nerves, I lost my voice completely for a while; whereupon I
was told that I must go away for a change. On going out to buy my ticket
for the journey, I felt so weak and broke out into such terrible perspiration
that I hastened to return to my wife in order to consult her as to the
advisability, in the circumstances, of abandoning the idea of the expedition
altogether. She, however, maintained (and perhaps rightly) not only that my
condition was not dangerous, but that it was to a large extent due to
imagination, and that, once in the right place, I would soon recover.
An inexpressible feeling of bitterness stimulated my nerves as in anger
and despair I quickly left the house to buy the confounded ticket for the
journey, and in the beginning of February I actually started on the road to
Paris. I was filled with the most extraordinary feelings, but the spark of
entered from this day forth, and in which I accustomed myself to look upon
the outward circumstances of my existence as being merely subservient to
my will. And by this means I was able to escape from the hampering
narrowness of my home life.
For the moment the proffered financial assistance was very distasteful to
me, for it seemed to forbid my raising any further objections to the
realisation of the detested Paris schemes. When, however, on the strength of
this favourable change in my affairs, I suggested to my wife that we might,
after all, content ourselves with remaining in Zürich, she flew into the most
violent passion over my weakness and lack of spirit, and declared that if I
did not make up my mind to achieve something in Paris, she would lose all
faith in me. She said, moreover, that she absolutely refused to be a witness
of my misery and grief as a wretched literary man and insignificant
conductor of local concerts in Zürich.
We had entered upon the year 1850; I had decided to go to Paris, if only
for the sake of peace, but had to postpone my journey on account of ill-
health. The reaction following upon the terrible excitement of recent times
had not failed to have its effect on my overwrought nerves, and a state of
complete exhaustion had followed. The continual colds, in spite of which I
had been obliged to work in my very unhealthy room, had at last given rise
to alarming symptoms. A certain weakness of the chest became apparent,
and this the doctor (a political refugee) undertook to cure by the application
of pitch plasters. As the result of this treatment and the irritating effect it
had upon my nerves, I lost my voice completely for a while; whereupon I
was told that I must go away for a change. On going out to buy my ticket
for the journey, I felt so weak and broke out into such terrible perspiration
that I hastened to return to my wife in order to consult her as to the
advisability, in the circumstances, of abandoning the idea of the expedition
altogether. She, however, maintained (and perhaps rightly) not only that my
condition was not dangerous, but that it was to a large extent due to
imagination, and that, once in the right place, I would soon recover.
An inexpressible feeling of bitterness stimulated my nerves as in anger
and despair I quickly left the house to buy the confounded ticket for the
journey, and in the beginning of February I actually started on the road to
Paris. I was filled with the most extraordinary feelings, but the spark of
Page 477
hope which was then kindled in my breast certainly had nothing whatever
to do with the belief that had been imposed upon me from without, that I
was to make a success in Paris as a composer of operas.
I was particularly anxious to find quiet rooms, for peace had now become
my first necessity, no matter where I happened to be staying. The cabman
who drove me from street to street through the most isolated quarters, and
whom I at last accused of keeping always to the most animated parts of the
city, finally protested in despair that one did not come to Paris to live in a
convent. At last it occurred to me to look for what I wanted in one of the
cites through which no vehicle seemed to drive, and I decided to engage
rooms in the Cite de Provence.
True to the plans which had been forced upon me, I at once called on
Herr Seghers about the performance of the Tannhäuser Overture.
It turned out that in spite of my late arrival I had missed nothing, for they
were still racking their brains as to how to procure the necessary orchestral
parts.
I therefore had to write to Liszt, asking him to order the copies, and had
to wait for their arrival. Belloni was not in town, things were therefore at a
standstill, and I had plenty of time to think over the object of my visit to
Paris, while an unceasing accompaniment was poured out to my
meditations by the barrel-organs which infest the cites of Paris.
I had much difficulty in convincing an agent of the government, from
whom I received a visit soon after my arrival, that my presence in Paris was
due to artistic reasons, and not to my doubtful position as a political
refugee.
Fortunately he was impressed by the score, which I showed him, as well
as by Liszt’s article on the Tannhäuser Overture, written the year before in
the Journal des Debats, and he left me, politely inviting me to continue my
avocations peacefully and industriously, as the police had no intention of
disturbing me.
I also looked up my older Parisian acquaintances. At the hospitable house
of Desplechins I met Semper, who was trying to make his position as
tolerable as possible by writing some inferior artistic work. He had left his
family in Dresden, from which town we soon received the most alarming
news. The prisons were gradually filling there with the unfortunate victims
of the recent Saxon movement Of Röckel, Bakunin, and Heubner, all we
to do with the belief that had been imposed upon me from without, that I
was to make a success in Paris as a composer of operas.
I was particularly anxious to find quiet rooms, for peace had now become
my first necessity, no matter where I happened to be staying. The cabman
who drove me from street to street through the most isolated quarters, and
whom I at last accused of keeping always to the most animated parts of the
city, finally protested in despair that one did not come to Paris to live in a
convent. At last it occurred to me to look for what I wanted in one of the
cites through which no vehicle seemed to drive, and I decided to engage
rooms in the Cite de Provence.
True to the plans which had been forced upon me, I at once called on
Herr Seghers about the performance of the Tannhäuser Overture.
It turned out that in spite of my late arrival I had missed nothing, for they
were still racking their brains as to how to procure the necessary orchestral
parts.
I therefore had to write to Liszt, asking him to order the copies, and had
to wait for their arrival. Belloni was not in town, things were therefore at a
standstill, and I had plenty of time to think over the object of my visit to
Paris, while an unceasing accompaniment was poured out to my
meditations by the barrel-organs which infest the cites of Paris.
I had much difficulty in convincing an agent of the government, from
whom I received a visit soon after my arrival, that my presence in Paris was
due to artistic reasons, and not to my doubtful position as a political
refugee.
Fortunately he was impressed by the score, which I showed him, as well
as by Liszt’s article on the Tannhäuser Overture, written the year before in
the Journal des Debats, and he left me, politely inviting me to continue my
avocations peacefully and industriously, as the police had no intention of
disturbing me.
I also looked up my older Parisian acquaintances. At the hospitable house
of Desplechins I met Semper, who was trying to make his position as
tolerable as possible by writing some inferior artistic work. He had left his
family in Dresden, from which town we soon received the most alarming
news. The prisons were gradually filling there with the unfortunate victims
of the recent Saxon movement Of Röckel, Bakunin, and Heubner, all we
Page 478
could hear was that they had been charged with high treason, and that they
were awaiting the death sentence.
In view of the tidings which continually arrived concerning the cruelty
and brutality with which the soldiers treated the prisoners, we could not
help considering our own lot a very happy one.
My intercourse with Semper, whom I saw frequently, was generally
enlivened by a gaiety which was occasionally of rather a risky nature; he
was determined to rejoin his family in London, where the prospect of
various appointments was open to him. My latest attempts at writing, and
the thoughts expressed in my work, interested him greatly, and gave rise to
animated conversations in which we were joined by Kietz, who was at first
amusing, but evidently boring Semper considerably. I found the former in
the identical position in which I had left him many years ago: he had made
no headway with his painting, and would have been glad if the revolution
had taken a more decided turn, so that, under cover of the general
confusion, he might have escaped from his embarrassing position with his
landlord. He made at this time quite a good pastel portrait of me in his very
best and earliest style. While I was sitting I unfortunately spoke to him
about my Das Kunstwerk der Zukunft, and thereby laid the foundation for
him of troubles that lasted many years, as he tried to instil my new ideas
into the Parisian bourgeoisie at whose tables he had hitherto been a
welcome guest. Notwithstanding, he remained as of old a good, obliging,
true-hearted fellow, and even Semper could not help putting up with him
cheerfully. I also looked up my friend Anders. It was a difficult matter to
find him at any hour of the day, since out of sleeping hours he was closeted
in the library, where he could receive no one, and afterwards retired to the
reading-room to spend his hours of rest, and generally went to dine with
certain bourgeois families where he gave music lessons. He had aged
considerably, but I was glad to find him, comparatively speaking, in better
health than the state in which I had last seen him had allowed me to hope,
as when I left Paris before he had seemed to be in a decline. Curiously
enough, a broken leg had been the means of improving his health, the
treatment necessary for it having taken him to a hydro, where his condition
had much improved. His one idea was to see me achieve a great success in
Paris, and he wished to secure a seat in advance for the first performance of
my opera, which he took for granted was to appear, and kept repeating that
it would be so very trying for him to occupy a place in any part of the
were awaiting the death sentence.
In view of the tidings which continually arrived concerning the cruelty
and brutality with which the soldiers treated the prisoners, we could not
help considering our own lot a very happy one.
My intercourse with Semper, whom I saw frequently, was generally
enlivened by a gaiety which was occasionally of rather a risky nature; he
was determined to rejoin his family in London, where the prospect of
various appointments was open to him. My latest attempts at writing, and
the thoughts expressed in my work, interested him greatly, and gave rise to
animated conversations in which we were joined by Kietz, who was at first
amusing, but evidently boring Semper considerably. I found the former in
the identical position in which I had left him many years ago: he had made
no headway with his painting, and would have been glad if the revolution
had taken a more decided turn, so that, under cover of the general
confusion, he might have escaped from his embarrassing position with his
landlord. He made at this time quite a good pastel portrait of me in his very
best and earliest style. While I was sitting I unfortunately spoke to him
about my Das Kunstwerk der Zukunft, and thereby laid the foundation for
him of troubles that lasted many years, as he tried to instil my new ideas
into the Parisian bourgeoisie at whose tables he had hitherto been a
welcome guest. Notwithstanding, he remained as of old a good, obliging,
true-hearted fellow, and even Semper could not help putting up with him
cheerfully. I also looked up my friend Anders. It was a difficult matter to
find him at any hour of the day, since out of sleeping hours he was closeted
in the library, where he could receive no one, and afterwards retired to the
reading-room to spend his hours of rest, and generally went to dine with
certain bourgeois families where he gave music lessons. He had aged
considerably, but I was glad to find him, comparatively speaking, in better
health than the state in which I had last seen him had allowed me to hope,
as when I left Paris before he had seemed to be in a decline. Curiously
enough, a broken leg had been the means of improving his health, the
treatment necessary for it having taken him to a hydro, where his condition
had much improved. His one idea was to see me achieve a great success in
Paris, and he wished to secure a seat in advance for the first performance of
my opera, which he took for granted was to appear, and kept repeating that
it would be so very trying for him to occupy a place in any part of the
Page 479
theatre where there would be likely to be a crush. He could not see the use
of my present literary work; in spite of this I was again engaged on it
exclusively, as I soon ascertained there was no likelihood of my overture to
Tannhäuser being produced. Liszt had shown the greatest zeal in obtaining
and forwarding the orchestral parts; but Herr Seghers informed me that as
far as his own orchestra was concerned, he found himself in a republican
democracy where each instrument had an equal right to voice its opinion,
and it had been unanimously decided that for the remainder of the winter
season, which was now drawing to a close, my overture could be dispensed
with. I gathered enough from this turn of affairs to realise how precarious
my position was.
It is true, the result of my writings was hardly less discouraging. A copy
of the Wigand edition of my Kunstwerk der Zukunft was forwarded to me
full of horrible misprints, and instead of the expected remuneration of
twenty louis d’or, my publisher explained that for the present he could only
pay me half this sum, as, owing to the fact that at first the sale of the Kunst
und Revolution had been very rapid, he had been led to attach too high a
commercial value to my writings, a mistake he had speedily discovered
when he found there was no demand for Die Nibelungen.
On the other hand, I received an offer of remunerative work from Adolph
Kolatschek, who was also a fugitive, and was just going to bring out a
German monthly journal as the organ of the progressive party. In response
to this invitation I wrote a long essay on Kunst und Klima (‘Art and
Climate’), in which I supplemented the ideas I had already touched upon in
my Kunstwerk der Zukunft. Besides this I had, since my arrival in Paris,
worked out a more complete sketch of Wieland der Schmied. It is true that
this work had no longer any value, and I wondered with apprehension what
I could write home to my wife, now that the last precious remittance had
been so aimlessly sacrificed. The thought of returning to Zürich was as
distasteful to me as the prospect of remaining any longer in Paris. My
feelings with regard to the latter alternative were intensified by the
impression made upon me by Meyerbeer’s opera The Prophet, which had
just been produced and which I had not heard before. Rearing itself on the
ruins of the hopes for new and more noble endeavour which had animated
the better works of the past year—the only result of the negotiations of the
provisional French republic for the encouragement of art—I saw this work
of Meyerbeer’s break upon the world like the dawn heralding this day of
of my present literary work; in spite of this I was again engaged on it
exclusively, as I soon ascertained there was no likelihood of my overture to
Tannhäuser being produced. Liszt had shown the greatest zeal in obtaining
and forwarding the orchestral parts; but Herr Seghers informed me that as
far as his own orchestra was concerned, he found himself in a republican
democracy where each instrument had an equal right to voice its opinion,
and it had been unanimously decided that for the remainder of the winter
season, which was now drawing to a close, my overture could be dispensed
with. I gathered enough from this turn of affairs to realise how precarious
my position was.
It is true, the result of my writings was hardly less discouraging. A copy
of the Wigand edition of my Kunstwerk der Zukunft was forwarded to me
full of horrible misprints, and instead of the expected remuneration of
twenty louis d’or, my publisher explained that for the present he could only
pay me half this sum, as, owing to the fact that at first the sale of the Kunst
und Revolution had been very rapid, he had been led to attach too high a
commercial value to my writings, a mistake he had speedily discovered
when he found there was no demand for Die Nibelungen.
On the other hand, I received an offer of remunerative work from Adolph
Kolatschek, who was also a fugitive, and was just going to bring out a
German monthly journal as the organ of the progressive party. In response
to this invitation I wrote a long essay on Kunst und Klima (‘Art and
Climate’), in which I supplemented the ideas I had already touched upon in
my Kunstwerk der Zukunft. Besides this I had, since my arrival in Paris,
worked out a more complete sketch of Wieland der Schmied. It is true that
this work had no longer any value, and I wondered with apprehension what
I could write home to my wife, now that the last precious remittance had
been so aimlessly sacrificed. The thought of returning to Zürich was as
distasteful to me as the prospect of remaining any longer in Paris. My
feelings with regard to the latter alternative were intensified by the
impression made upon me by Meyerbeer’s opera The Prophet, which had
just been produced and which I had not heard before. Rearing itself on the
ruins of the hopes for new and more noble endeavour which had animated
the better works of the past year—the only result of the negotiations of the
provisional French republic for the encouragement of art—I saw this work
of Meyerbeer’s break upon the world like the dawn heralding this day of
Page 480
disgraceful desolation. I was so sickened by this performance, that though I
was unfortunately placed in the centre of the stalls and would willingly
have avoided the disturbance necessarily occasioned by one of the audience
moving during the middle of an act, even this consideration did not deter
me from getting up and leaving the house. When the famous mother of the
prophet finally gives vent to her grief in the well-known series of ridiculous
roulades, I was filled with rage and despair at the thought that I should be
called upon to listen to such a thing, and never again did I pay the slightest
heed to this opera.
But what was I to do next? Just as the South American republics had
attracted me during my first miserable sojourn in Paris, so now my longing
was directed towards the East, where I could live my life in a manner
worthy of a human being far away from this modern world. While I was in
this frame of mind I was called upon to answer another inquiry as to my
state of health from Mme. Laussot in Bordeaux. It turned out that my
answer prompted her to send me a kind and pressing invitation to go and
stay at her house, at least for a short time, to rest and forget my troubles. In
any circumstances an excursion to more southerly regions, which I had not
yet seen, and a visit to people who, though utter strangers, showed such
friendly interest in me, could not fail to prove attractive and flattering. I
accepted, settled my affairs in Paris, and went by coach via Orleans, Tours,
and Angouleme, down the Gironde to the unknown town, where I was
received with great courtesy and cordiality by the young wine merchant
Eugene Laussot, and presented to my sympathetic young friend, his wife. A
closer acquaintance with the family, in which Mrs. Taylor, Mme. Laussot’s
mother, was now also included, led to a clearer understanding of the
character of the sympathy bestowed upon me in such a cordial and
unexpected manner by people hitherto unknown to me. Jessie, as the young
wife was called at home, had, during a somewhat lengthy stay in Dresden,
become very intimate with the Ritter family, and I had no reason to doubt
the assurance given me, that the Laussots’ interest in me and my work was
principally owing to this intimacy. After my flight from Dresden, as soon as
the news of my difficulties had reached the Ritters, a correspondence had
been carried on between Dresden and Bordeaux with a view to ascertaining
how best to assist me. Jessie attributed the whole idea to Frau Julie Ritter
who, while not being well enough off herself to make me a sufficient
allowance, was endeavouring to come to an understanding with Jessie’s
was unfortunately placed in the centre of the stalls and would willingly
have avoided the disturbance necessarily occasioned by one of the audience
moving during the middle of an act, even this consideration did not deter
me from getting up and leaving the house. When the famous mother of the
prophet finally gives vent to her grief in the well-known series of ridiculous
roulades, I was filled with rage and despair at the thought that I should be
called upon to listen to such a thing, and never again did I pay the slightest
heed to this opera.
But what was I to do next? Just as the South American republics had
attracted me during my first miserable sojourn in Paris, so now my longing
was directed towards the East, where I could live my life in a manner
worthy of a human being far away from this modern world. While I was in
this frame of mind I was called upon to answer another inquiry as to my
state of health from Mme. Laussot in Bordeaux. It turned out that my
answer prompted her to send me a kind and pressing invitation to go and
stay at her house, at least for a short time, to rest and forget my troubles. In
any circumstances an excursion to more southerly regions, which I had not
yet seen, and a visit to people who, though utter strangers, showed such
friendly interest in me, could not fail to prove attractive and flattering. I
accepted, settled my affairs in Paris, and went by coach via Orleans, Tours,
and Angouleme, down the Gironde to the unknown town, where I was
received with great courtesy and cordiality by the young wine merchant
Eugene Laussot, and presented to my sympathetic young friend, his wife. A
closer acquaintance with the family, in which Mrs. Taylor, Mme. Laussot’s
mother, was now also included, led to a clearer understanding of the
character of the sympathy bestowed upon me in such a cordial and
unexpected manner by people hitherto unknown to me. Jessie, as the young
wife was called at home, had, during a somewhat lengthy stay in Dresden,
become very intimate with the Ritter family, and I had no reason to doubt
the assurance given me, that the Laussots’ interest in me and my work was
principally owing to this intimacy. After my flight from Dresden, as soon as
the news of my difficulties had reached the Ritters, a correspondence had
been carried on between Dresden and Bordeaux with a view to ascertaining
how best to assist me. Jessie attributed the whole idea to Frau Julie Ritter
who, while not being well enough off herself to make me a sufficient
allowance, was endeavouring to come to an understanding with Jessie’s
Page 481
mother, the well-to-do widow of an English lawyer, whose income entirely
supported the young couple in Bordeaux. This plan had so far succeeded,
that shortly after my arrival in Bordeaux Mrs. Taylor informed me that the
two families had combined, and that it had been decided to ask me to accept
the help of three thousand francs a year until the return of better days. My
one object now was to enlighten my benefactors as to the exact conditions
under which I should be accepting such assistance. I could no longer reckon
upon achieving any success as a composer of opera either in Paris or
elsewhere; what line I should take up instead I did not know; but, at all
events, I was determined to keep myself free from the disgrace which
would reflect upon my whole life if I used such means as this offer
presented to secure success. I feel sure I am not wrong in believing that
Jessie was the only one who understood me, and though I only experienced
kindness from the rest of the family, I soon discovered the gulf by which
she, as well as myself, was separated from her mother and husband. While
the husband, who was a handsome young man, was away the greater part of
the day attending to his business, and the mother’s deafness excluded her to
a great extent from our conversations, we soon discovered by a rapid
exchange of ideas that we shared the same opinions on many important
matters, and this led to a great feeling of friendship between us. Jessie, who
was at that time about twenty-two, bore little resemblance to her mother,
and no doubt took after her father, of whom I heard most flattering
accounts. A large and varied collection of books loft by this man to his
daughter showed his tastes, for besides carrying on his lucrative profession
as a lawyer, he had devoted himself to the study of literature and science.
From him Jessie had also learned German as a child, and she spoke that
language with great fluency. She had been brought up on Grimm’s fairy-
tales, and was, moreover, thoroughly acquainted with German poetry, as
well as with that of England and France, and her knowledge of them was as
thorough as the most advanced education could demand. French literature
did not appeal to her much. Her quick powers of comprehension were
astonishing. Everything which I touched upon she immediately grasped and
assimilated. It was the same with music: she read at sight with the greatest
facility, and was an accomplished player. During her stay in Dresden she
had been told that I was still in search of the pianist who could play
Beethoven’s great Sonata in B flat major, and she now astonished me by her
finished rendering of this most difficult piece. The emotion aroused in me
supported the young couple in Bordeaux. This plan had so far succeeded,
that shortly after my arrival in Bordeaux Mrs. Taylor informed me that the
two families had combined, and that it had been decided to ask me to accept
the help of three thousand francs a year until the return of better days. My
one object now was to enlighten my benefactors as to the exact conditions
under which I should be accepting such assistance. I could no longer reckon
upon achieving any success as a composer of opera either in Paris or
elsewhere; what line I should take up instead I did not know; but, at all
events, I was determined to keep myself free from the disgrace which
would reflect upon my whole life if I used such means as this offer
presented to secure success. I feel sure I am not wrong in believing that
Jessie was the only one who understood me, and though I only experienced
kindness from the rest of the family, I soon discovered the gulf by which
she, as well as myself, was separated from her mother and husband. While
the husband, who was a handsome young man, was away the greater part of
the day attending to his business, and the mother’s deafness excluded her to
a great extent from our conversations, we soon discovered by a rapid
exchange of ideas that we shared the same opinions on many important
matters, and this led to a great feeling of friendship between us. Jessie, who
was at that time about twenty-two, bore little resemblance to her mother,
and no doubt took after her father, of whom I heard most flattering
accounts. A large and varied collection of books loft by this man to his
daughter showed his tastes, for besides carrying on his lucrative profession
as a lawyer, he had devoted himself to the study of literature and science.
From him Jessie had also learned German as a child, and she spoke that
language with great fluency. She had been brought up on Grimm’s fairy-
tales, and was, moreover, thoroughly acquainted with German poetry, as
well as with that of England and France, and her knowledge of them was as
thorough as the most advanced education could demand. French literature
did not appeal to her much. Her quick powers of comprehension were
astonishing. Everything which I touched upon she immediately grasped and
assimilated. It was the same with music: she read at sight with the greatest
facility, and was an accomplished player. During her stay in Dresden she
had been told that I was still in search of the pianist who could play
Beethoven’s great Sonata in B flat major, and she now astonished me by her
finished rendering of this most difficult piece. The emotion aroused in me
Page 482
by finding such an exceptionally developed talent suddenly changed to
anxiety when I heard her sing. Her sharp, shrill voice, in which there was
strength but no real depth of feeling, so shocked me that I could not refrain
from begging her to desist from singing in future. With regard to the
execution of the sonata, she listened eagerly to my instructions as to how it
should be interpreted, though I could not feel that she would succeed in
rendering it according to my ideas. I read her my latest essays, and she
seemed to understand even the most extraordinary descriptions perfectly.
My poem on Siegfried’s Tod moved her deeply, but she preferred my sketch
of Wieland der Schmied. She admitted afterwards that she would prefer to
imagine herself filling the role of Wieland’s worthy bride than to find
herself in the position and forced to endure the fate of Gutrune in Siegfried.
It followed inevitably that the presence of the other members of the family
proved embarrassing when we wanted to talk over and discuss these various
subjects. If we felt somewhat troubled at having to confess to ourselves that
Mrs. Taylor would certainly never be able to understand why I was being
offered assistance, I was still more disconcerted at realising after a time the
complete want of harmony between the young couple, particularly from an
intellectual point of view. The fact that Laussot had for some time been well
aware of his wife’s dislike for him was plainly shown when he one day so
far forgot himself as to complain loudly and bitterly that she would not even
love a child of his if she had one, and that he therefore thought it fortunate
that she was not a mother. Astonished and saddened, I suddenly gazed into
an abyss which was hidden here, as is often the case, under the appearance
of a tolerably happy married life. About this time, and just as my visit,
which had already lasted three weeks, was drawing to a close, I received a
letter from my wife that could not have had a more unfortunate effect on my
state of mind. She was, on the whole, pleased at my having found new
friends, but at the same time explained that if I did not immediately return
to Paris, and there endeavour to secure the production of my overture with
the results anticipated, she would not know what to think of me, and would
certainly fail to understand me if I returned to Zürich without having
effected my purpose. At the same time my depression was intensified in a
terrible way by a notice in the papers announcing that Röckel, Bakunin, and
Heubner had been sentenced to death, and that the date of their execution
was fixed. I wrote a short but stirring letter of farewell to the two first, and
as I saw no possibility of having it conveyed to the prisoners, who were
anxiety when I heard her sing. Her sharp, shrill voice, in which there was
strength but no real depth of feeling, so shocked me that I could not refrain
from begging her to desist from singing in future. With regard to the
execution of the sonata, she listened eagerly to my instructions as to how it
should be interpreted, though I could not feel that she would succeed in
rendering it according to my ideas. I read her my latest essays, and she
seemed to understand even the most extraordinary descriptions perfectly.
My poem on Siegfried’s Tod moved her deeply, but she preferred my sketch
of Wieland der Schmied. She admitted afterwards that she would prefer to
imagine herself filling the role of Wieland’s worthy bride than to find
herself in the position and forced to endure the fate of Gutrune in Siegfried.
It followed inevitably that the presence of the other members of the family
proved embarrassing when we wanted to talk over and discuss these various
subjects. If we felt somewhat troubled at having to confess to ourselves that
Mrs. Taylor would certainly never be able to understand why I was being
offered assistance, I was still more disconcerted at realising after a time the
complete want of harmony between the young couple, particularly from an
intellectual point of view. The fact that Laussot had for some time been well
aware of his wife’s dislike for him was plainly shown when he one day so
far forgot himself as to complain loudly and bitterly that she would not even
love a child of his if she had one, and that he therefore thought it fortunate
that she was not a mother. Astonished and saddened, I suddenly gazed into
an abyss which was hidden here, as is often the case, under the appearance
of a tolerably happy married life. About this time, and just as my visit,
which had already lasted three weeks, was drawing to a close, I received a
letter from my wife that could not have had a more unfortunate effect on my
state of mind. She was, on the whole, pleased at my having found new
friends, but at the same time explained that if I did not immediately return
to Paris, and there endeavour to secure the production of my overture with
the results anticipated, she would not know what to think of me, and would
certainly fail to understand me if I returned to Zürich without having
effected my purpose. At the same time my depression was intensified in a
terrible way by a notice in the papers announcing that Röckel, Bakunin, and
Heubner had been sentenced to death, and that the date of their execution
was fixed. I wrote a short but stirring letter of farewell to the two first, and
as I saw no possibility of having it conveyed to the prisoners, who were
Page 483
confined in the fortress of Konigstein, I decided to send it to Frau von
Lüttichau, to be forwarded to them by her, because I thought she was the
only person in whose power it might lie to do this for me, while at the same
time she had sufficient generosity and independence of mind to enable her
to respect and carry out my wishes, in spite of any possible difference of
opinion she might entertain. I was told some time afterwards that Lüttichau
had got hold of the letter and thrown it into the fire. For the time being this
painful impression helped me to the determination to break with every one
and everything, to lose all desire to learn more of life or of art, and, even at
the risk of having to endure the greatest privations, to trust to chance and
put myself beyond the reach of everybody. The small income settled upon
me by my friends I wished to divide between myself and my wife, and with
my half go to Greece or Asia Minor, and there, Heaven alone knew how,
seek to forget and be forgotten. I communicated this plan to the only
confidante I had left to me, chiefly in order that she might be able to
enlighten my benefactors as to how I intended disposing of the income they
had offered me. She seemed pleased with the idea, and the resolve to
abandon herself to the same fate seemed to her also, in her resentment
against her position, to be quite an easy matter. She expressed us much by
hints and a word dropped here and there. Without clearly realising what it
would lead to, and without coming to any understanding with her, I left
Bordeaux towards the end of April, more excited than soothed in spirit, and
filled with regret and anxiety. I returned to Paris, for the time being, stunned
and full of uncertainty as to what to do next. Feeling very unwell,
exhausted, and at the same time excited from want of sleep, I reached my
destination and put up at the Hotel Valois, where I remained a week,
struggling to gain my self-control and to face my strange position. Even if I
had wished to resume the plans which had been instrumental in bringing me
to Paris, I soon convinced myself that little or nothing could be done. I was
filled with distress and anger at being called upon to waste my energies in a
direction contrary to my tastes, merely to satisfy the unreasonable demands
made upon me. I was at length obliged to answer my wife’s last pressing
communication, and wrote her a long and detailed letter in which I kindly,
but at the same time frankly, retraced the whole of our life together, and
explained that I was fully determined to set her free from any immediate
participation in my fate, as I felt quite incapable of so arranging it so as to
meet with her approval. I promised her the half of whatever means I should
Lüttichau, to be forwarded to them by her, because I thought she was the
only person in whose power it might lie to do this for me, while at the same
time she had sufficient generosity and independence of mind to enable her
to respect and carry out my wishes, in spite of any possible difference of
opinion she might entertain. I was told some time afterwards that Lüttichau
had got hold of the letter and thrown it into the fire. For the time being this
painful impression helped me to the determination to break with every one
and everything, to lose all desire to learn more of life or of art, and, even at
the risk of having to endure the greatest privations, to trust to chance and
put myself beyond the reach of everybody. The small income settled upon
me by my friends I wished to divide between myself and my wife, and with
my half go to Greece or Asia Minor, and there, Heaven alone knew how,
seek to forget and be forgotten. I communicated this plan to the only
confidante I had left to me, chiefly in order that she might be able to
enlighten my benefactors as to how I intended disposing of the income they
had offered me. She seemed pleased with the idea, and the resolve to
abandon herself to the same fate seemed to her also, in her resentment
against her position, to be quite an easy matter. She expressed us much by
hints and a word dropped here and there. Without clearly realising what it
would lead to, and without coming to any understanding with her, I left
Bordeaux towards the end of April, more excited than soothed in spirit, and
filled with regret and anxiety. I returned to Paris, for the time being, stunned
and full of uncertainty as to what to do next. Feeling very unwell,
exhausted, and at the same time excited from want of sleep, I reached my
destination and put up at the Hotel Valois, where I remained a week,
struggling to gain my self-control and to face my strange position. Even if I
had wished to resume the plans which had been instrumental in bringing me
to Paris, I soon convinced myself that little or nothing could be done. I was
filled with distress and anger at being called upon to waste my energies in a
direction contrary to my tastes, merely to satisfy the unreasonable demands
made upon me. I was at length obliged to answer my wife’s last pressing
communication, and wrote her a long and detailed letter in which I kindly,
but at the same time frankly, retraced the whole of our life together, and
explained that I was fully determined to set her free from any immediate
participation in my fate, as I felt quite incapable of so arranging it so as to
meet with her approval. I promised her the half of whatever means I should
Page 484
have at my disposal now or in the future, and told her she must accept this
arrangement with a good grace, because the occasion had now arisen to take
that step of parting from me which, on our first meeting again in
Switzerland, she had declared herself ready to do. I ended my letter without
bidding her a final farewell. I thereupon wrote to Bordeaux immediately to
inform Jessie of the step I had taken, though my means did not as yet allow
of my forming any definite plan which I could communicate to her for my
complete flight from the world. In return she announced that she was
determined to do likewise, and asked for my protection, under which she
intended to place herself when once she had set herself free. Much alarmed,
I did all in my power to make her realise that it was one thing for a man,
placed in such a desperate situation as myself, to cut himself adrift in the
face of insurmountable difficulties, but quite another matter for a young
woman, at least to all outward appearances, happily settled, to decide to
break up her home, for reasons which probably no one except myself would
be in a position to understand. Regarding the unconventionality of her
resolve in the eyes of the world, she assured me that it would be carried out
as quietly as possible, and that for the present she merely thought of
arranging to visit her friends the Ritters in Dresden. I felt so upset by all this
that I yielded to my craving for retirement, and sought it at no great distance
from Paris. Towards the middle of April I went to Montmorency, of which I
had heard many agreeable accounts, and there sought a modest hiding-
place. With great difficulty I dragged myself to the outskirts of the little
town, where the country still bore a wintry aspect, and turned into the little
strip of garden belonging to a wine merchant, which was filled with visitors
only on Sundays, and there refreshed myself with some bread and cheese
and a bottle of wine. A crowd of hens surrounded me, and I kept throwing
them pieces of bread, and was touched by the self-sacrificing
abstemiousness with which the cock gave all to his wives though I aimed
particularly at him. They became bolder and bolder, and finally flew on to
the table and attacked my provisions; the cock flew after them, and noticing
that everything was topsy-turvy, pounced upon the cheese with the
eagerness of a craving long unsatisfied. When I found myself being driven
from the table by this chaos of fluttering wings, I was filled with a gaiety to
which I had long been a stranger. I laughed heartily, and looked round for
the signboard of the inn. I thereby discovered that my host rejoiced in the
name of Homo. This seemed a hint from Fate, and I felt I must seek shelter
arrangement with a good grace, because the occasion had now arisen to take
that step of parting from me which, on our first meeting again in
Switzerland, she had declared herself ready to do. I ended my letter without
bidding her a final farewell. I thereupon wrote to Bordeaux immediately to
inform Jessie of the step I had taken, though my means did not as yet allow
of my forming any definite plan which I could communicate to her for my
complete flight from the world. In return she announced that she was
determined to do likewise, and asked for my protection, under which she
intended to place herself when once she had set herself free. Much alarmed,
I did all in my power to make her realise that it was one thing for a man,
placed in such a desperate situation as myself, to cut himself adrift in the
face of insurmountable difficulties, but quite another matter for a young
woman, at least to all outward appearances, happily settled, to decide to
break up her home, for reasons which probably no one except myself would
be in a position to understand. Regarding the unconventionality of her
resolve in the eyes of the world, she assured me that it would be carried out
as quietly as possible, and that for the present she merely thought of
arranging to visit her friends the Ritters in Dresden. I felt so upset by all this
that I yielded to my craving for retirement, and sought it at no great distance
from Paris. Towards the middle of April I went to Montmorency, of which I
had heard many agreeable accounts, and there sought a modest hiding-
place. With great difficulty I dragged myself to the outskirts of the little
town, where the country still bore a wintry aspect, and turned into the little
strip of garden belonging to a wine merchant, which was filled with visitors
only on Sundays, and there refreshed myself with some bread and cheese
and a bottle of wine. A crowd of hens surrounded me, and I kept throwing
them pieces of bread, and was touched by the self-sacrificing
abstemiousness with which the cock gave all to his wives though I aimed
particularly at him. They became bolder and bolder, and finally flew on to
the table and attacked my provisions; the cock flew after them, and noticing
that everything was topsy-turvy, pounced upon the cheese with the
eagerness of a craving long unsatisfied. When I found myself being driven
from the table by this chaos of fluttering wings, I was filled with a gaiety to
which I had long been a stranger. I laughed heartily, and looked round for
the signboard of the inn. I thereby discovered that my host rejoiced in the
name of Homo. This seemed a hint from Fate, and I felt I must seek shelter
Page 485
here at all costs. An extraordinarily small and narrow bedroom was shown
me, which I immediately engaged. Besides the bed it held a rough table and
two cane-bottomed chairs. I arranged one of these as a washhand-stand, and
on the table I placed some books, writing materials, and the score of
Lohengrin, and almost heaved a sigh of content in spite of my extremely
cramped accommodation. Though the weather remained uncertain and the
woods with their leafless trees did not seem to offer the prospect of very
enticing walks, I still felt that here there was a possibility of my being
forgotten, and being also in my turn allowed to forget the events that had
lately filled me with Midi desperate anxiety. My old artistic instinct awoke
again. I looked over my Lohengrin score, and quickly decided to send it to
Liszt and leave it to him to bring it out as best he could. Now that I had got
rid of this score also, I felt as free as a bird and as careless as Diogenes
about what might befall me. I even invited Kietz to come and stay with me
and share the pleasures of my retreat. He did actually come, as he had done
during my stay in. Mendon; but he found me even more modestly installed
than I had been there. He was quite prepared to take pot-luck, however, and
cheerfully slept on an improvised bed, promising to keep the world in touch
with me upon his return to Paris. I was suddenly startled from my state of
complacency by the news that my wife had come to Paris to look me up. I
had an hour’s painful struggle with myself to settle the course I should
pursue, and decided not to allow the step I had taken in regard to her to be
looked upon as an ill-considered and excusable vagary. I left Montmorency
and betook myself to Paris, summoned Kietz to my hotel, and instructed
him to tell my wife, who had already been trying to gain admittance to him,
that he knew nothing more of me except that I had left Paris. The poor
fellow, who felt as much pity for Minna as for me, was so utterly
bewildered on this occasion, that he declared that he felt as though he were
the axis upon which all the misery in the world turned. But he apparently
realised the significance and importance of my decision, as it was necessary
he should, and acquitted himself in this delicate matter with intelligence and
good feeling. That night t left Paris by train for Clermont-Tonnerre, from
whence I travelled on to Geneva, there to await news from Frau Ritter in
Dresden. My exhaustion was such that, even had I possessed the necessary
means, I could not as yet have contemplated undergoing the fatigue of a
long journey. By way of gaining time for further developments I retired to
Villeneuve, at the other end of the Lake of Geneva, where I put up at the
me, which I immediately engaged. Besides the bed it held a rough table and
two cane-bottomed chairs. I arranged one of these as a washhand-stand, and
on the table I placed some books, writing materials, and the score of
Lohengrin, and almost heaved a sigh of content in spite of my extremely
cramped accommodation. Though the weather remained uncertain and the
woods with their leafless trees did not seem to offer the prospect of very
enticing walks, I still felt that here there was a possibility of my being
forgotten, and being also in my turn allowed to forget the events that had
lately filled me with Midi desperate anxiety. My old artistic instinct awoke
again. I looked over my Lohengrin score, and quickly decided to send it to
Liszt and leave it to him to bring it out as best he could. Now that I had got
rid of this score also, I felt as free as a bird and as careless as Diogenes
about what might befall me. I even invited Kietz to come and stay with me
and share the pleasures of my retreat. He did actually come, as he had done
during my stay in. Mendon; but he found me even more modestly installed
than I had been there. He was quite prepared to take pot-luck, however, and
cheerfully slept on an improvised bed, promising to keep the world in touch
with me upon his return to Paris. I was suddenly startled from my state of
complacency by the news that my wife had come to Paris to look me up. I
had an hour’s painful struggle with myself to settle the course I should
pursue, and decided not to allow the step I had taken in regard to her to be
looked upon as an ill-considered and excusable vagary. I left Montmorency
and betook myself to Paris, summoned Kietz to my hotel, and instructed
him to tell my wife, who had already been trying to gain admittance to him,
that he knew nothing more of me except that I had left Paris. The poor
fellow, who felt as much pity for Minna as for me, was so utterly
bewildered on this occasion, that he declared that he felt as though he were
the axis upon which all the misery in the world turned. But he apparently
realised the significance and importance of my decision, as it was necessary
he should, and acquitted himself in this delicate matter with intelligence and
good feeling. That night t left Paris by train for Clermont-Tonnerre, from
whence I travelled on to Geneva, there to await news from Frau Ritter in
Dresden. My exhaustion was such that, even had I possessed the necessary
means, I could not as yet have contemplated undergoing the fatigue of a
long journey. By way of gaining time for further developments I retired to
Villeneuve, at the other end of the Lake of Geneva, where I put up at the
Page 486
Hotel Byron, which was quite empty at the time. Here I learned that Karl
Ritter had arrived in Zürich, as he said he would, with the intention of
paying me a visit. Impressing upon him the necessity for the strictest
secrecy, I invited him to join me at the Lake of Geneva, and in the second
week in May we met at the Hotel Byron. The characteristic which pleased
me in him was his absolute devotion, his quick comprehension of my
position and the necessity of my resolutions, as well as his readiness to
submit without question to all my arrangements, even where he himself was
concerned. He was full of my latest literary efforts, told me what an
impression they had made on his acquaintances, and thereby induced me to
spend the few days of rest I was enjoying in preparing my poem of
Siegfried’s Tod for publication.
I wrote a short preface dedicating this poem to my friends as a relic of the
time when I had hoped to devote myself entirely to art, and especially to the
composition of music. I sent this manuscript to Herr Wigand in Leipzig,
who returned it to me after some time with the remark, that if I insisted on
its being printed in Latin characters he would not be able to sell a single
copy of it. Later on I discovered that he deliberately refused to pay me the
ten louis d’or due to me for Das Kunstwerk der Zukunft, which I had
directed him to send to my wife. Disappointing as all this was, I was
nevertheless unable to engage in any further work, as only a few days after
Karl’s arrival the realities of life made themselves felt in an unexpected
manner, most upsetting to my tranquillity of mind. I received a wildly
excited letter from Mme. Laussot to tell me that she had not been able to
resist telling her mother of her intentions, that in so doing she had
immediately aroused the suspicion that I was to blame, and in consequence
of this her disclosure had been communicated to M. Laussot, who vowed he
would search everywhere for me in order to put a bullet through my body.
The situation was clear enough, and I decided to go to Bordeaux
immediately in order to come to an understanding with my opponent I at
once wrote fully to M. Eugene, endeavouring to make him see matters in
their true light, but at the same time declared myself incapable of
understanding how a man could bring himself to keep a woman with him by
force, when she no longer wished to remain. I ended by informing him that
I should reach Bordeaux at, the same time as my letter, and immediately
upon my arrival there would let him know at what hotel to find me; also
that I would not tell his wife of the step I was taking, and that he could
Ritter had arrived in Zürich, as he said he would, with the intention of
paying me a visit. Impressing upon him the necessity for the strictest
secrecy, I invited him to join me at the Lake of Geneva, and in the second
week in May we met at the Hotel Byron. The characteristic which pleased
me in him was his absolute devotion, his quick comprehension of my
position and the necessity of my resolutions, as well as his readiness to
submit without question to all my arrangements, even where he himself was
concerned. He was full of my latest literary efforts, told me what an
impression they had made on his acquaintances, and thereby induced me to
spend the few days of rest I was enjoying in preparing my poem of
Siegfried’s Tod for publication.
I wrote a short preface dedicating this poem to my friends as a relic of the
time when I had hoped to devote myself entirely to art, and especially to the
composition of music. I sent this manuscript to Herr Wigand in Leipzig,
who returned it to me after some time with the remark, that if I insisted on
its being printed in Latin characters he would not be able to sell a single
copy of it. Later on I discovered that he deliberately refused to pay me the
ten louis d’or due to me for Das Kunstwerk der Zukunft, which I had
directed him to send to my wife. Disappointing as all this was, I was
nevertheless unable to engage in any further work, as only a few days after
Karl’s arrival the realities of life made themselves felt in an unexpected
manner, most upsetting to my tranquillity of mind. I received a wildly
excited letter from Mme. Laussot to tell me that she had not been able to
resist telling her mother of her intentions, that in so doing she had
immediately aroused the suspicion that I was to blame, and in consequence
of this her disclosure had been communicated to M. Laussot, who vowed he
would search everywhere for me in order to put a bullet through my body.
The situation was clear enough, and I decided to go to Bordeaux
immediately in order to come to an understanding with my opponent I at
once wrote fully to M. Eugene, endeavouring to make him see matters in
their true light, but at the same time declared myself incapable of
understanding how a man could bring himself to keep a woman with him by
force, when she no longer wished to remain. I ended by informing him that
I should reach Bordeaux at, the same time as my letter, and immediately
upon my arrival there would let him know at what hotel to find me; also
that I would not tell his wife of the step I was taking, and that he could
Page 487
consequently act without restraint. I did not conceal from him, what indeed
was the fact, that I was undertaking this journey under great difficulties, as
under the circumstances I considered it impossible to wait to have my
passport endorsed by the French envoy. At the same time I wrote a few lines
to Mme. Laussot, exhorting her to be calm and self-possessed, but, true to
my purpose, refrained from even hinting at any movement on my part.
(When, years afterwards, I told Liszt this story, he declared I had acted very
stupidly in not, telling Mme. Laussot of my intentions.) I took leave of Karl
the same day, in order to set out next morning from Geneva on my tedious
journey across France. But I was so exhausted by all this that I could not
help thinking I was going to die. That same night I wrote to Frau Ritter in
Dresden, to this effect, giving her a short account of the incredible
difficulties I had been drawn into. As a matter of fact, I suffered great
inconvenience at the French frontier on account of my passport; I was made
to give my exact place of destination, and it was only upon my assuring
them that pressing family affairs required my immediate presence, that the
authorities showed exceptional leniency and allowed me to proceed.
I travelled by Lyons through Auvergne by stage-coach for three days and
two nights, till at length I reached Bordeaux. It was the middle of May, and
as I surveyed the town from a height at early dawn I saw it lit up by a fire
that had broken out. I alighted at the Hotel Quatre Soeurs, and at once sent a
note to M. Laussot, informing him that I held myself at his disposal and
would remain in all day to receive him. It was nine o’clock in the morning
when I sent him this message. I waited in vain for an answer, till at last, late
in the afternoon, I received a summons from the police-station to present
myself immediately. There I was first of all asked whether my passport was
in order. I acknowledged the difficulty I found myself in with regard to it,
and explained that family matters had necessitated my placing myself in
this position.
I was thereupon informed that precisely this family matter, which had no
doubt brought me there, was the cause of their having to deny me the
permission to remain in Bordeaux any longer. In answer to my question,
they did not conceal the fact that these proceedings against me were being
carried out at the express wish of the family concerned. This extraordinary
revelation immediately restored my good-humour. I asked the police
inspector whether, after such a trying journey, I might not be allowed a
couple of days’ rest before returning; this request he readily granted, and
was the fact, that I was undertaking this journey under great difficulties, as
under the circumstances I considered it impossible to wait to have my
passport endorsed by the French envoy. At the same time I wrote a few lines
to Mme. Laussot, exhorting her to be calm and self-possessed, but, true to
my purpose, refrained from even hinting at any movement on my part.
(When, years afterwards, I told Liszt this story, he declared I had acted very
stupidly in not, telling Mme. Laussot of my intentions.) I took leave of Karl
the same day, in order to set out next morning from Geneva on my tedious
journey across France. But I was so exhausted by all this that I could not
help thinking I was going to die. That same night I wrote to Frau Ritter in
Dresden, to this effect, giving her a short account of the incredible
difficulties I had been drawn into. As a matter of fact, I suffered great
inconvenience at the French frontier on account of my passport; I was made
to give my exact place of destination, and it was only upon my assuring
them that pressing family affairs required my immediate presence, that the
authorities showed exceptional leniency and allowed me to proceed.
I travelled by Lyons through Auvergne by stage-coach for three days and
two nights, till at length I reached Bordeaux. It was the middle of May, and
as I surveyed the town from a height at early dawn I saw it lit up by a fire
that had broken out. I alighted at the Hotel Quatre Soeurs, and at once sent a
note to M. Laussot, informing him that I held myself at his disposal and
would remain in all day to receive him. It was nine o’clock in the morning
when I sent him this message. I waited in vain for an answer, till at last, late
in the afternoon, I received a summons from the police-station to present
myself immediately. There I was first of all asked whether my passport was
in order. I acknowledged the difficulty I found myself in with regard to it,
and explained that family matters had necessitated my placing myself in
this position.
I was thereupon informed that precisely this family matter, which had no
doubt brought me there, was the cause of their having to deny me the
permission to remain in Bordeaux any longer. In answer to my question,
they did not conceal the fact that these proceedings against me were being
carried out at the express wish of the family concerned. This extraordinary
revelation immediately restored my good-humour. I asked the police
inspector whether, after such a trying journey, I might not be allowed a
couple of days’ rest before returning; this request he readily granted, and
Page 488
told me that in any case there could be no chance of my meeting the family
in question, as they had left Bordeaux at mid-day. I used these two days to
recover from my fatigue, and also wrote a letter to Jessie, in which I told
her exactly what had taken place, without concealing my contempt at the
behaviour of her husband, who could expose his wife’s honour by a
denunciation to the police. I also added that our friendship could certainly
not continue until she had released herself from so humiliating a position.
The next thing was to get this letter safely delivered. The information
furnished me by the police officials was not sufficient to enlighten me as to
what had exactly taken place in the Laussot family, whether they had left
home for some length of time or merely for a day, so I simply made up my
mind to go to their house. I rang the bell and the door sprang open; without
meeting any one I walked up to the first-floor flat, the door of which stood
open, and went from room to room till I reached Jessie’s boudoir, where I
placed my letter in her work-basket and returned the way I had come. I
received no reply, and set out upon my return journey as soon as the term of
rest granted me had expired. The fine May weather had a cheering effect
upon me, and the clear water, as well as the agreeable name of the
Dordogne, along whose banks the post-chaise travelled for some distance,
gave me great pleasure.
I was also entertained by the conversation of two fellow-travellers, a
priest and an officer, about the necessity of putting an end to the French
Republic. The priest showed himself much more humane and broad-minded
than his military interlocutor, who could only repeat the one refrain, ‘Il faut
en finir.’ I now had a look at Lyons, and in a walk round the town tried to
recall the scenes in Lamartine’s Histoire des Girondins, where he so vividly
describes the siege and surrender of the town during the period of the
Convention Nationale. At last I arrived at Geneva, and returned to the
Byron hotel, where Karl Ritter was awaiting me. During my absence he had
heard from his family, who wrote very kindly concerning me. His mother
had at once reassured him as to my condition, and pointed out that with
people suffering from nervous disorders the idea of approaching death was
a frequent symptom, and that there was consequently no occasion to feel
anxious about me. She also announced her intention of coming to visit us in
Villeneuve with her daughter Emilie in a few days’ time. This news made
me take heart again; this devoted family, so solicitous for my welfare,
seemed sent by Providence to lead me, as I so longed to be led, to a new
in question, as they had left Bordeaux at mid-day. I used these two days to
recover from my fatigue, and also wrote a letter to Jessie, in which I told
her exactly what had taken place, without concealing my contempt at the
behaviour of her husband, who could expose his wife’s honour by a
denunciation to the police. I also added that our friendship could certainly
not continue until she had released herself from so humiliating a position.
The next thing was to get this letter safely delivered. The information
furnished me by the police officials was not sufficient to enlighten me as to
what had exactly taken place in the Laussot family, whether they had left
home for some length of time or merely for a day, so I simply made up my
mind to go to their house. I rang the bell and the door sprang open; without
meeting any one I walked up to the first-floor flat, the door of which stood
open, and went from room to room till I reached Jessie’s boudoir, where I
placed my letter in her work-basket and returned the way I had come. I
received no reply, and set out upon my return journey as soon as the term of
rest granted me had expired. The fine May weather had a cheering effect
upon me, and the clear water, as well as the agreeable name of the
Dordogne, along whose banks the post-chaise travelled for some distance,
gave me great pleasure.
I was also entertained by the conversation of two fellow-travellers, a
priest and an officer, about the necessity of putting an end to the French
Republic. The priest showed himself much more humane and broad-minded
than his military interlocutor, who could only repeat the one refrain, ‘Il faut
en finir.’ I now had a look at Lyons, and in a walk round the town tried to
recall the scenes in Lamartine’s Histoire des Girondins, where he so vividly
describes the siege and surrender of the town during the period of the
Convention Nationale. At last I arrived at Geneva, and returned to the
Byron hotel, where Karl Ritter was awaiting me. During my absence he had
heard from his family, who wrote very kindly concerning me. His mother
had at once reassured him as to my condition, and pointed out that with
people suffering from nervous disorders the idea of approaching death was
a frequent symptom, and that there was consequently no occasion to feel
anxious about me. She also announced her intention of coming to visit us in
Villeneuve with her daughter Emilie in a few days’ time. This news made
me take heart again; this devoted family, so solicitous for my welfare,
seemed sent by Providence to lead me, as I so longed to be led, to a new
Page 489
life. Both ladies arrived in time to celebrate my thirty-seventh birthday on
the twenty-second of May. The mother, Frau Julie, particularly made a deep
impression upon me. I had only met her once before in Dresden, when Karl
had invited me to be present at the performance of a quartette of his own
composition, given at his mother’s house. On this occasion the respect and
devotion shown me by each member of the family had delighted me. The
mother had hardly spoken to me, but when I was leaving she was moved to
tears as she thanked me for my visit. I was unable to understand her
emotion at the time, but now when I reminded her of it she was surprised,
and explained that she had felt so touched at my unexpected kindness to her
son.
She and her daughter remained with us about a week. We sought
diversion in excursions to the beautiful Valais, but did not succeed in
dispelling Frau Ritter’s sadness of heart, caused by the knowledge of recent
events of which she had now been informed, as well as by her anxiety at the
course my life was taking. As I afterwards learned, it had cost the nervous,
delicate woman a great effort to undertake this journey, and when I urged
her to leave her house to come and settle in Switzerland with her family, so
that we might all be united, she at last pointed out to me that in proposing
what seemed to her such an eccentric undertaking, I was counting upon a
strength and energy she no longer possessed. For the present she
commended her son, whom she wished to leave with me, to my care, and
gave me the necessary means to keep us both for the time being. Regarding
the state of her fortune, she told me that her income was limited, and now
that it was impossible to accept any help from the Laussots, she did not
know how she would be able to come to my assistance sufficiently to assure
my independence. Deeply moved, we took leave of this venerable woman at
the end of a week, and she returned to Dresden with her daughter, and I
never saw her again.
Still bent upon discovering a means of disappearing from the world, I
thought of choosing a wild mountain spot where I could retire with Karl.
For this purpose we sought the lonely Visper Thal in the canton Valais, and
not without difficulty made our way along the impracticable roads to
Zermatt. There, at the foot of the colossal and beautiful Matterhorn, we
could indeed consider ourselves cut off from the outer world. I tried to
make things as comfortable as I could in this primitive wilderness, but
discovered only too soon that Karl could not reconcile himself to his
the twenty-second of May. The mother, Frau Julie, particularly made a deep
impression upon me. I had only met her once before in Dresden, when Karl
had invited me to be present at the performance of a quartette of his own
composition, given at his mother’s house. On this occasion the respect and
devotion shown me by each member of the family had delighted me. The
mother had hardly spoken to me, but when I was leaving she was moved to
tears as she thanked me for my visit. I was unable to understand her
emotion at the time, but now when I reminded her of it she was surprised,
and explained that she had felt so touched at my unexpected kindness to her
son.
She and her daughter remained with us about a week. We sought
diversion in excursions to the beautiful Valais, but did not succeed in
dispelling Frau Ritter’s sadness of heart, caused by the knowledge of recent
events of which she had now been informed, as well as by her anxiety at the
course my life was taking. As I afterwards learned, it had cost the nervous,
delicate woman a great effort to undertake this journey, and when I urged
her to leave her house to come and settle in Switzerland with her family, so
that we might all be united, she at last pointed out to me that in proposing
what seemed to her such an eccentric undertaking, I was counting upon a
strength and energy she no longer possessed. For the present she
commended her son, whom she wished to leave with me, to my care, and
gave me the necessary means to keep us both for the time being. Regarding
the state of her fortune, she told me that her income was limited, and now
that it was impossible to accept any help from the Laussots, she did not
know how she would be able to come to my assistance sufficiently to assure
my independence. Deeply moved, we took leave of this venerable woman at
the end of a week, and she returned to Dresden with her daughter, and I
never saw her again.
Still bent upon discovering a means of disappearing from the world, I
thought of choosing a wild mountain spot where I could retire with Karl.
For this purpose we sought the lonely Visper Thal in the canton Valais, and
not without difficulty made our way along the impracticable roads to
Zermatt. There, at the foot of the colossal and beautiful Matterhorn, we
could indeed consider ourselves cut off from the outer world. I tried to
make things as comfortable as I could in this primitive wilderness, but
discovered only too soon that Karl could not reconcile himself to his
Page 490
surroundings. Even on the second day he owned that he thought it horrid,
and suggested that it would be more pleasant in the neighbourhood of one
of the lakes. We studied the map of Switzerland, and chose Thun for our
next destination. Unfortunately I again found myself reduced to a state of
extreme nervous fatigue, in which the slightest effort produced a profuse
and weakening perspiration. Only by the greatest strength of will was I able
to make my way out of the valley; but at last we reached Thun, and with
renewed courage engaged a couple of modest but cheerful rooms looking
out on to the road, and proposed to wait and see how we should like it. In
spite of the reserve which still betrayed his shyness of character, I found
conversation with my young friend always pleasant and enlivening. I now
realised the pitch of fluent and overflowing vivacity to which the young
man could attain, particularly at night before retiring to rest, when he would
squat down beside my bed, and in the agreeable, pure dialect of the German
Baltic provinces, give free expression to whatever had excited his interest. I
was exceedingly cheered during these days by the perusal of the Odyssey,
which I had not read for so long and which had fallen into my hands by
chance. Homer’s long-suffering hero, always homesick yet condemned to
perpetual wandering, and always valiantly overcoming all difficulties, was
strangely sympathetic to me. Suddenly the peaceful state I had scarcely yet
entered upon was disturbed by a letter which Karl received from Mme.
Laussot. He did not know whether he ought to show it to me, as he thought
Jessie had gone mad. I tore it out of his hand, and found she had written to
say that she felt obliged to let my friend know that she had been sufficiently
enlightened about me to make her drop my acquaintance entirely. I
afterwards discovered, chiefly through the help of Frau Ritter, that in
consequence of my letter and my arrival in Bordeaux, M. Laussot, together
with Mrs. Taylor, had immediately taken Jessie to the country, intending to
remain there until the news was received of my departure, to accelerate
which he had applied to the police authorities. While they were away, and
without telling her of my letter and my journey, they had obtained a
promise from the young woman to remain quiet for a year, give up her visit
to Dresden, and, above all, to drop all correspondence with me; since, under
these conditions, she was promised her entire freedom at the end of that
time, she had thought it better to give her word. Not content with this,
however, the two conspirators had immediately set about calumniating me
on all sides, and finally to Mme. Laussot herself, saying that I was the
and suggested that it would be more pleasant in the neighbourhood of one
of the lakes. We studied the map of Switzerland, and chose Thun for our
next destination. Unfortunately I again found myself reduced to a state of
extreme nervous fatigue, in which the slightest effort produced a profuse
and weakening perspiration. Only by the greatest strength of will was I able
to make my way out of the valley; but at last we reached Thun, and with
renewed courage engaged a couple of modest but cheerful rooms looking
out on to the road, and proposed to wait and see how we should like it. In
spite of the reserve which still betrayed his shyness of character, I found
conversation with my young friend always pleasant and enlivening. I now
realised the pitch of fluent and overflowing vivacity to which the young
man could attain, particularly at night before retiring to rest, when he would
squat down beside my bed, and in the agreeable, pure dialect of the German
Baltic provinces, give free expression to whatever had excited his interest. I
was exceedingly cheered during these days by the perusal of the Odyssey,
which I had not read for so long and which had fallen into my hands by
chance. Homer’s long-suffering hero, always homesick yet condemned to
perpetual wandering, and always valiantly overcoming all difficulties, was
strangely sympathetic to me. Suddenly the peaceful state I had scarcely yet
entered upon was disturbed by a letter which Karl received from Mme.
Laussot. He did not know whether he ought to show it to me, as he thought
Jessie had gone mad. I tore it out of his hand, and found she had written to
say that she felt obliged to let my friend know that she had been sufficiently
enlightened about me to make her drop my acquaintance entirely. I
afterwards discovered, chiefly through the help of Frau Ritter, that in
consequence of my letter and my arrival in Bordeaux, M. Laussot, together
with Mrs. Taylor, had immediately taken Jessie to the country, intending to
remain there until the news was received of my departure, to accelerate
which he had applied to the police authorities. While they were away, and
without telling her of my letter and my journey, they had obtained a
promise from the young woman to remain quiet for a year, give up her visit
to Dresden, and, above all, to drop all correspondence with me; since, under
these conditions, she was promised her entire freedom at the end of that
time, she had thought it better to give her word. Not content with this,
however, the two conspirators had immediately set about calumniating me
on all sides, and finally to Mme. Laussot herself, saying that I was the
Page 491
initiator of this plan of elopement. Mrs. Taylor had written to my wife
complaining of my intention to commit adultery, at the same time
expressing her pity for her and offering her support; the unfortunate Minna,
who now thought she had found a hitherto unsuspected reason for my
resolve to remain separated from her, wrote back complaining of me to Mrs.
Taylor. The meaning of an innocent remark I had once made had been
strangely misinterpreted, and matters wore now aggravated by making it
appear as though I had intentionally lied. In the course of playful
conversation Jessie had once told me that she belonged to no recognised
form of religion, her father Having teen a member of a certain sect which
did not baptise either according to the Protestant or the Roman Catholic
ritual; whereupon I had comforted her by assuring her that I had come in
contact with much more questionable sects, as shortly after my marriage in
Königsberg I had learned that it had been solemnised by a hypocrite. God
alone knows in what form this had been repeated to the worthy British
matron, but, at all events, she told my wife that I had said I was ‘not legally
married to her.’ In any case, my wife’s answer to this had no doubt
furnished further material with which to poison Jessie’s mind against me,
and this letter to my young friend was the result. I must admit that, seen by
this light, the circumstance at which I felt most indignant was the way my
wife had been treated, and while I was perfectly indifferent as to what the
rest of the party thought of me, I immediately accepted Karl’s offer to go to
Zürich and see her, so as to give her the explanation necessary to her peace
of mind. While awaiting his return, I received a letter from Liszt, telling me
of the deep impression made upon him by my Lohengrin score, which had
caused him to make up his mind as to the future in store for me. He at the
same time announced that, as I had given him the permission to do so, he
intended doing all in his power to bring about the production of my opera at
the forthcoming Herder festival in Weimar. About this time I also heard
from Frau Ritter, who, in consequence of events of which she was well
aware, thought herself called upon to beg me not to take the matter too
much to heart. At this moment Karl also returned from Zürich, and spoke
with great warmth of my wife’s attitude. Not having found me in Paris, she
had pulled herself together with remarkable energy, and in pursuance of an
earlier wish of mine, had rented a house on the lake of Zürich, installed
herself comfortably, and remained there in the hope of at last hearing from
me again. Besides this, he had much to tell me of Sulzer’s good sense and
complaining of my intention to commit adultery, at the same time
expressing her pity for her and offering her support; the unfortunate Minna,
who now thought she had found a hitherto unsuspected reason for my
resolve to remain separated from her, wrote back complaining of me to Mrs.
Taylor. The meaning of an innocent remark I had once made had been
strangely misinterpreted, and matters wore now aggravated by making it
appear as though I had intentionally lied. In the course of playful
conversation Jessie had once told me that she belonged to no recognised
form of religion, her father Having teen a member of a certain sect which
did not baptise either according to the Protestant or the Roman Catholic
ritual; whereupon I had comforted her by assuring her that I had come in
contact with much more questionable sects, as shortly after my marriage in
Königsberg I had learned that it had been solemnised by a hypocrite. God
alone knows in what form this had been repeated to the worthy British
matron, but, at all events, she told my wife that I had said I was ‘not legally
married to her.’ In any case, my wife’s answer to this had no doubt
furnished further material with which to poison Jessie’s mind against me,
and this letter to my young friend was the result. I must admit that, seen by
this light, the circumstance at which I felt most indignant was the way my
wife had been treated, and while I was perfectly indifferent as to what the
rest of the party thought of me, I immediately accepted Karl’s offer to go to
Zürich and see her, so as to give her the explanation necessary to her peace
of mind. While awaiting his return, I received a letter from Liszt, telling me
of the deep impression made upon him by my Lohengrin score, which had
caused him to make up his mind as to the future in store for me. He at the
same time announced that, as I had given him the permission to do so, he
intended doing all in his power to bring about the production of my opera at
the forthcoming Herder festival in Weimar. About this time I also heard
from Frau Ritter, who, in consequence of events of which she was well
aware, thought herself called upon to beg me not to take the matter too
much to heart. At this moment Karl also returned from Zürich, and spoke
with great warmth of my wife’s attitude. Not having found me in Paris, she
had pulled herself together with remarkable energy, and in pursuance of an
earlier wish of mine, had rented a house on the lake of Zürich, installed
herself comfortably, and remained there in the hope of at last hearing from
me again. Besides this, he had much to tell me of Sulzer’s good sense and
Page 492
friendliness, the latter having stood by, my wife and shown her great
sympathy. In the midst of his narrative Karl suddenly exclaimed, ‘Ah! these
could be called sensible people; but with such a mad Englishwoman
nothing could be done.’ To all this I said not a word, but finally with a smile
asked him whether he would like to go over to Zürich? He sprang up
exclaiming, ‘Yes, and as soon as possible.’ ‘You shall have your way,’ said
I; ‘let us pack. I can see no sense in anything either here or there.’ Without
breathing another syllable about all that had happened, we left the next day
for Zürich.
sympathy. In the midst of his narrative Karl suddenly exclaimed, ‘Ah! these
could be called sensible people; but with such a mad Englishwoman
nothing could be done.’ To all this I said not a word, but finally with a smile
asked him whether he would like to go over to Zürich? He sprang up
exclaiming, ‘Yes, and as soon as possible.’ ‘You shall have your way,’ said
I; ‘let us pack. I can see no sense in anything either here or there.’ Without
breathing another syllable about all that had happened, we left the next day
for Zürich.
Page 493
Transcriber’s Notes
New original cover art included with this eBook is granted to the
public domain.
New original cover art included with this eBook is granted to the
public domain.
Page 494
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK MY LIFE —
VOLUME 1 ***
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will be
renamed.
Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright law
means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the
Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States
without permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying
and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the
PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a
registered trademark, and may not be used if you charge for an eBook,
except by following the terms of the trademark license, including paying
royalties for use of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge
anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is
very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg
eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may do
practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by
U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license,
especially commercial redistribution.
START: FULL LICENSE
VOLUME 1 ***
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will be
renamed.
Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright law
means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the
Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States
without permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules,
set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying
and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the
PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a
registered trademark, and may not be used if you charge for an eBook,
except by following the terms of the trademark license, including paying
royalties for use of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge
anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is
very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg
eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may do
practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by
U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license,
especially commercial redistribution.
START: FULL LICENSE
Page 495
THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG™ LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or any
other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project Gutenberg”), you
agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project Gutenberg License
available with this file or online at www.gutenberg.org/license.
Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing
Project Gutenberg electronic works
1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg electronic work,
you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept all the
terms of this license and intellectual property (trademark/copyright)
agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all the terms of this agreement,
you must cease using and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg
electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy
of or access to a Project Gutenberg electronic work and you do not agree to
be bound by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be used on
or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who agree to be
bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few things that you can
do with most Project Gutenberg electronic works even without complying
with the full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There are a
lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg electronic works if you
follow the terms of this agreement and help preserve free future access to
Project Gutenberg electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the Foundation”
or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
Gutenberg electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an individual
work is unprotected by copyright law in the United States and you are
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or any
other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project Gutenberg”), you
agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project Gutenberg License
available with this file or online at www.gutenberg.org/license.
Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing
Project Gutenberg electronic works
1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg electronic work,
you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept all the
terms of this license and intellectual property (trademark/copyright)
agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all the terms of this agreement,
you must cease using and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg
electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy
of or access to a Project Gutenberg electronic work and you do not agree to
be bound by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be used on
or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who agree to be
bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few things that you can
do with most Project Gutenberg electronic works even without complying
with the full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There are a
lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg electronic works if you
follow the terms of this agreement and help preserve free future access to
Project Gutenberg electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the Foundation”
or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
Gutenberg electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the
collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an individual
work is unprotected by copyright law in the United States and you are
Page 496
located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works
based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg are
removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project Gutenberg
mission of promoting free access to electronic works by freely sharing
Project Gutenberg works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for
keeping the Project Gutenberg name associated with the work. You can
easily comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg License when you
share it without charge with others.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in a
constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check the
laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement before
downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or creating
derivative works based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg work.
The Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright status
of any work in any country other than the United States.
1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
access to, the full Project Gutenberg License must appear prominently
whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg work (any work on which the
phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied
or distributed:
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States
and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
under the terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License included with
this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in
the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country
where you are located before using this eBook.
copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works
based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg are
removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project Gutenberg
mission of promoting free access to electronic works by freely sharing
Project Gutenberg works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for
keeping the Project Gutenberg name associated with the work. You can
easily comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg License when you
share it without charge with others.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in a
constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check the
laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement before
downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or creating
derivative works based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg work.
The Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright status
of any work in any country other than the United States.
1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
access to, the full Project Gutenberg License must appear prominently
whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg work (any work on which the
phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project
Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied
or distributed:
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States
and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
under the terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License included with
this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in
the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country
where you are located before using this eBook.
Page 497
1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg electronic work is derived from
texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a notice
indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright holder), the
work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the United States without
paying any fees or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a
work with the phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on
the work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs
1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
Project Gutenberg trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg electronic work is posted with the
permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution must comply
with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed
by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked to the Project
Gutenberg License for all works posted with the permission of the
copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg License
terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this work or any
other work associated with Project Gutenberg.
1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without prominently
displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with active links or
immediate access to the full terms of the Project Gutenberg License.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg work in a format other than “Plain
Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official version posted on the
official Project Gutenberg website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no
additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a means of
exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work
in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format
must include the full Project Gutenberg License as specified in paragraph
1.E.1.
texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a notice
indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright holder), the
work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the United States without
paying any fees or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a
work with the phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on
the work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs
1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
Project Gutenberg trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg electronic work is posted with the
permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution must comply
with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed
by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked to the Project
Gutenberg License for all works posted with the permission of the
copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg License
terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this work or any
other work associated with Project Gutenberg.
1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without prominently
displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with active links or
immediate access to the full terms of the Project Gutenberg License.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or
distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg work in a format other than “Plain
Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official version posted on the
official Project Gutenberg website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no
additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a means of
exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work
in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format
must include the full Project Gutenberg License as specified in paragraph
1.E.1.
Page 498
1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, performing,
copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg works unless you comply
with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing access to
or distributing Project Gutenberg electronic works provided that:
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from the
use of Project Gutenberg works calculated using the method you
already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the
owner of the Project Gutenberg trademark, but he has agreed to donate
royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days
following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to
prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly
marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information about
donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”
• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does
not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You
must require such a user to return or destroy all copies of the works
possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use of and all
access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.
• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
receipt of the work.
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free distribution
of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™
electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth in
this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project
copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg works unless you comply
with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing access to
or distributing Project Gutenberg electronic works provided that:
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from the
use of Project Gutenberg works calculated using the method you
already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the
owner of the Project Gutenberg trademark, but he has agreed to donate
royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days
following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to
prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly
marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information about
donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”
• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does
not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You
must require such a user to return or destroy all copies of the works
possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use of and all
access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.
• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
receipt of the work.
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free distribution
of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™
electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth in
this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project
Page 499
Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3
below.
1.F.
1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread works
not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project Gutenberg™
collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and
the medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as,
but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription
errors, a copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or
damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that
damage or cannot be read by your equipment.
1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except
for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to
you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE
THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT
EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE
THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY
DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE
TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL,
PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE
NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you
discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you
can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the
defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a refund.
If you received the work electronically, the person or entity providing it to
below.
1.F.
1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread works
not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project Gutenberg™
collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and
the medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as,
but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription
errors, a copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or
damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that
damage or cannot be read by your equipment.
1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except
for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to
you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE
THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT
EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE
THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY
DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE
TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL,
PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE
NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you
discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you
can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the
defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a refund.
If you received the work electronically, the person or entity providing it to
Page 500
you may choose to give you a second opportunity to receive the work
electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you
may demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the
problem.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO OTHER
WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR
FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied warranties or
the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If any disclaimer or
limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law of the state applicable
to this agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum
disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity
or unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
remaining provisions.
1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in accordance
with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works,
harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that
arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do or cause
to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg work, (b)
alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg
work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project
Gutenberg
Project Gutenberg is synonymous with the free distribution of electronic
works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers including
obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists because of the
electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you
may demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the
problem.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO OTHER
WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR
FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied warranties or
the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If any disclaimer or
limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law of the state applicable
to this agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum
disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity
or unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
remaining provisions.
1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in accordance
with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works,
harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that
arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do or cause
to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg work, (b)
alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg
work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project
Gutenberg
Project Gutenberg is synonymous with the free distribution of electronic
works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers including
obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists because of the
Page 501
efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from people in all walks of
life.
Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the assistance
they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg’s goals and ensuring
that the Project Gutenberg collection will remain freely available for
generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation was created to provide a secure and permanent future for
Project Gutenberg and future generations. To learn more about the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations
can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
www.gutenberg.org.
Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)
(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the state of
Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue Service.
The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification number is 64-6221541.
Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax
deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state’s
laws.
The Foundation’s business office is located at 41 Watchung Plaza #516,
Montclair NJ 07042, USA, +1 (862) 621-9288. Email contact links and up
to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website and
official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread
public support and donations to carry out its mission of increasing the
number of public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed
in machine-readable form accessible by the widest array of equipment
life.
Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the assistance
they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg’s goals and ensuring
that the Project Gutenberg collection will remain freely available for
generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation was created to provide a secure and permanent future for
Project Gutenberg and future generations. To learn more about the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations
can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
www.gutenberg.org.
Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)
(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the state of
Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue Service.
The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification number is 64-6221541.
Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax
deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state’s
laws.
The Foundation’s business office is located at 41 Watchung Plaza #516,
Montclair NJ 07042, USA, +1 (862) 621-9288. Email contact links and up
to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website and
official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread
public support and donations to carry out its mission of increasing the
number of public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed
in machine-readable form accessible by the widest array of equipment
Page 502
including outdated equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are
particularly important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.
The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United States.
Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a considerable effort,
much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up with these
requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where we have not
received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or
determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit
www.gutenberg.org/donate.
While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we have
not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition against
accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who approach us
with offers to donate.
International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make any
statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from outside the
United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation methods
and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other ways including
checks, online payments and credit card donations. To donate, please visit:
www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg
electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg
concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared with
anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project Gutenberg
eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
Project Gutenberg eBooks are often created from several printed editions,
all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in the U.S. unless a
particularly important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.
The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United States.
Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a considerable effort,
much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up with these
requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where we have not
received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or
determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit
www.gutenberg.org/donate.
While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we have
not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition against
accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who approach us
with offers to donate.
International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make any
statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from outside the
United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation methods
and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other ways including
checks, online payments and credit card donations. To donate, please visit:
www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg
electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg
concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared with
anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project Gutenberg
eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.
Project Gutenberg eBooks are often created from several printed editions,
all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in the U.S. unless a
Page 503
copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily keep eBooks in
compliance with any particular paper edition.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search facility:
www.gutenberg.org.
This website includes information about Project Gutenberg, including how
to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation,
how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email
newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
compliance with any particular paper edition.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search facility:
www.gutenberg.org.
This website includes information about Project Gutenberg, including how
to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation,
how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email
newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
Page 504
back