The New English Canaan of Thomas Morton with Introductory Matter and Notes Thomas Morton 4885 downloads.pdf

467 pages · Make another flipbook

Page 1

Page 2

Page 3

The Project Gutenberg eBook of The New English Canaan of
Thomas Morton with Introductory Matter and Notes
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you
will have to check the laws of the country where you are located
before using this eBook.

Title: The New English Canaan of Thomas Morton with Introductory
Matter and Notes

Author: Thomas Morton

Editor: Charles Francis Adams

Release date: February 14, 2017 [eBook #54162]
Most recently updated: October 23, 2024

Language: English

Other information and formats: www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/54162

Credits: E-text prepared by Henry Flower and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net) from page images
generously made available by Internet Archive
(https://archive.org)

*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE NEW
ENGLISH CANAAN OF THOMAS MORTON WITH INTRODUCTORY
MATTER AND NOTES ***

Page 4

The Project Gutenberg eBook, The New English Canaan of Thomas Morton
with Introductory Matter and Notes, by Thomas Morton and Charles
Francis Adams

Note: Images of the original pages are available through Internet
Archive. See https://archive.org/details/newenglishcanaan00mort

Page 5

Transcriber's Note
A table of contents detailing the chapters of the original book is located at the end of the
text.
This book is a 19th century edition of a 17th century original, along with extensive
commentary. The 19th century edition used different page numbering. To facilitate internal
references to specific pages, the original 17th century page numbers have been
incorporated into the text enclosed by curly braces, e.g. {123}. References to these
numbers in the text have been kept as printed, e.g. *123.
Click on the illustration on page 12 to see a higher-resolution image.

Page 6

Publications of the Prince Society.

THE NEW ENGLISH CANAAN.

Page 7

THE
Publications of the Prince Society.
Established May 25th, 1858.

THE NEW
ENGLISH CANAAN.

Boston:
PRINTED FOR THE SOCIETY,
By John Wilson and Son.
1883.

Page 8

TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY COPIES.

Page 9

THE

NEW ENGLISH CANAAN
OF
THOMAS MORTON.

WITH INTRODUCTORY MATTER AND NOTES
BY
CHARLES FRANCIS ADAMS, Jr.

Boston:
PUBLISHED BY THE PRINCE SOCIETY.
1883.

Page 10

Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1883, by
The Prince Society,
In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington.

Editor:
CHARLES FRANCIS ADAMS, Jr.

Page 11

TABLE OF CONTENTS.
Page
Preface v-vi
Thomas Morton of Merry-Mount 1-98
Bibliography of New English Canaan 99-105
New English Canaan 106-345
Book I. The Origin of the Natives; their Manners and
115-78
Customs
Book II. A Description of the Beauty of the Country 179-242
Book III. A Description of the People 243-345
Table of Contents of the New English Canaan 347-9

Officers of the Prince Society 353
The Prince Society, 1883 354-8
Publications of the Prince Society 359
Volumes in Preparation by the Prince Society 360
Index 361-81

Page 12

Page 13

PREFACE.
EFORE undertaking the present work I had no
experience as an editor. It is unnecessary for me to say,
therefore, that, were I now to undertake it, I should
pursue a somewhat different course from that which I
have pursued. The New English Canaan is, in many
respects, a singular book. One of its most singular
features is the extent of ground it covers. Not only is it
full of obscure references to incidents in early New
England history, but it deals directly with the aborigines, the trees, animals,
fish, birds and geology of the region; besides having constant incidental
allusions to literature,—both classic and of the author’s time,—to
geography, and to then current events. No one person can possess the
knowledge necessary to thoroughly cover so large a field. To edit properly
he must have recourse to specialists.
It was only as the labor of investigation increased on my hands that I
realized what a wealth of scientific and special knowledge was to be
reached, in the neighborhood of Boston, by any one engaged in such
multifarious inquiry. Were I again to enter upon it I should confine my own
labors chiefly to correspondence; for on every point which comes up there
is some one now in this vicinity, if he can only be found out, who has made

Page 14

a study of it, and has more information than the most laborious and skilful
of editors can acquire.
In this edition of the New Canaan I have not laid so many of these
specialists as I now wish, under requisition; and yet the list is a tolerably
extensive one. In every case, also, the assistance asked for has been
rendered as of course, in the true scientific spirit. My correspondence has
included Messrs. Deane, Winsor and Ellis on events in early New England
history; Professor Whitney on geographical allusions; Professors Lane and
Greenough, Dr. Everett and Mr. T. W. Higginson, on references to the Greek
and Latin classics, or quotations from them; and the Rev. Mr. Norton on
Scriptural allusions. Mr. J. C. Gray has hunted up for me legal precedents
five centuries old, and Mr. Lindsay Swift has explained archaic expressions,
to the meaning of which I could get no clew. On the subject of trees and
herbs I called on Professors Gray and Sargent; in regard to birds, Mr.
William Brewster was indefatigable; Mr. Allen, though in very poor health,
took the chapter on animals; Professor Shaler disposed of the geology;
Messrs. Agassiz and Lyman instructed me as to fish, and Professor Putnam
as to shell-heaps. I met some allusions to early French and other explorers,
and naturally had recourse to Messrs. Parkman and Slafter; while in regard
to Indian words and names, I have been in constant correspondence with the
one authority, Mr. J. Hammond Trumbull, who has recognized to the fullest
extent the public obligation which a mastery of a special subject imposes on
him who masters it.
In closing a pleasant editorial task, my chief regret, therefore, is that the
notes in this volume contain so much matter of my own. They should have
been even more eclectic than they are, and each from the highest possible
authority on the subject to which it relates.
C. F. A., Jr.

Quincy, Mass., April 4, 1883.

Page 15

MORTON OF MERRY-MOUNT.
In the second book of his history of Plymouth Plantation, Governor
Bradford, while dealing with the events of the year 1628 though writing at a
still later period, says:—
“Aboute some three or four years before this time, ther came
over one Captaine Wolastone (a man of pretie parts), and with
him three or four more of some eminencie, who brought with
them a great many servants, with provisions and other
implaments for to begine a plantation; and pitched themselves in
a place within the Massachusets, which they called, after their
Captains name, Mount-Wollaston. Amongst whom was one Mr.
Morton, who, it should seeme, had some small adventure (of his
owne or other mens) amongst them.”[1]
There is no other known record of Wollaston than that contained in this
passage of Bradford.[2] His given name even is not mentioned. It may be
surmised with tolerable certainty that he was one of the numerous traders,
generally from Bristol or the West of England, who frequented the fishing
grounds and the adjacent American coast during the early years of the
seventeenth century. Nothing is actually known of him, however, until in
1625 he appeared in Massachusetts Bay, as Boston Harbor was then called,
at the head of the expedition which Bradford mentions.

Page 16

His purpose and that of his companions was to establish a plantation and
trading-post in the country of the Massachusetts tribe of Indians. It was the
third attempt of the kind which had been made since the settlement at
Plymouth, a little more than four years before. The first of these attempts
had been that of Thomas Weston at Wessagusset, or Weymouth, in the
summer of 1622. This had resulted in a complete failure, the story of which
is told by Bradford and Winslow, and forms one of the more striking pages
in the annals of early New England. The second attempt, and that which
next preceded Wollaston’s, had closely followed the first, being made in the
summer of 1623, under the immediate direction of the Council for New
England. At the head of it was Captain Robert Gorges, a younger son of Sir
Ferdinando Gorges. Weston’s expedition was a mere trading venture,
having little connection with anything which went before or which came
after. That of Gorges, however, was something more. As will presently be
seen, it had a distinct political and religious significance.
Robert Gorges and his party arrived in Boston Bay in 1623, during what is
now the latter part of September. They established themselves in the
buildings which had been occupied by Weston’s people during the previous
winter, and which had been deserted by them a few days less than six
months before. The site of those buildings cannot be definitely fixed. It is
supposed to have been on Phillips Creek, a small tidal inlet of the
Weymouth fore-river, a short distance above the Quincy-Point bridge. The
grant made to Robert Gorges by the Council for New England, and upon
which he probably intended to place his party, was on the other side of the
bay, covering ten miles of sea-front and stretching thirty miles into the
interior. It was subsequently pronounced void by the lawyers on the ground
of being “loose and uncertain,” but as nearly as can now be fixed it covered
the shore between Nahant and the mouth of the Charles, and the region
back of that as far west as Concord and Sudbury, including Lynn and the
most thickly inhabited portions of the present county of Middlesex.
Reaching New England, however, late in the season, Gorges’s first anxiety
was to secure shelter for his party against the impending winter, for the
frosts had already begun. Fortunately the few savages thereabouts had been
warned by Governor Bradford not to injure the Wessagusset buildings, and
thus they afforded a welcome shelter to the newcomers. These were people
of a very different class from those who had preceded them. Among them

Page 17

were men of education, and some of them were married and had brought
their wives. Their settlement proved a permanent one. Robert Gorges, it is
true, the next spring returned to England disgusted and discouraged, taking
back with him a portion of his followers. Others of them went on to
Virginia in search of a milder climate and a more fertile soil. A few,
however, remained at Wessagusset,[3] and are repeatedly referred to by
Morton in the New Canaan[4] as his neighbors at that place.
When, therefore, Wollaston sailed into the bay in the early summer of 1625,
its shores were not wholly unoccupied. His party consisted of himself and
some three or four partners, with thirty or more servants, as they were
called, or men who had sold their time for a period of years to an employer,
and who stood in the relation to him of apprentice to master. Rasdall,
according to Bradford, was the name of one of the partners, and Fitcher
would seem to have been that of another. Thomas Morton, the author of the
New English Canaan, was a third.
Not much more is known of Morton’s life prior to his coming to America
than of Wollaston’s. He had certainly an education of that sort which was
imparted in the schools of the Elizabethan period, for he had a smattering
knowledge of the more familiar Latin authors at least, and was fond of
classic allusion. Governor Dudley, in his letter to the Countess of Lincoln,
says that while in England he was an attorney in “the west countries.”[5] He
further intimates that he had there been implicated in some foul
misdemeanor, on account of which warrants were out against him.
Nathaniel Morton in his Memorial[6] says that the crime thus referred to was
the killing of a partner concerned with him, Thomas Morton, in his first
New England venture. Thomas Wiggin, however, writing in 1632 to Sir
John Cooke, one of King Charles’s secretaries for foreign affairs and a
member of the Privy Council, states, upon the authority of Morton’s “wife’s
sonne and others,” that he had fled to New England “upon a foule suspition
of murther.”[7] While, therefore, it would seem that grave charges were in
general circulation against Morton, connecting him with some deed of
violence, it is necessary to bear in mind that considerable allowance must
be made before any accusation against him can be accepted on the word of
either the Massachusetts or the Plymouth authorities, or those in sympathy
with them. Yet Morton was a reckless man, and he lived in a time when no
great degree of sanctity attached to human life; so that in itself there is

Page 18

nothing very improbable in this charge. It is possible that before coming to
America he may have put some one out of the way. Nevertheless, as will
presently be seen, though he was subsequently arrested and in jail in
England, the accusation never took any formal shape. That he was at some
time married would appear from the letter of Wiggin already referred to,
and the allusions in the New Canaan show that he had been a man
passionately fond of field sports, and a good deal of a traveller as well. He
speaks, for instance, of having been “bred in so genious a way” that in
England he had the common use of hawks in fowling; and, in another place,
he alludes to his having been so near the equator that “I have had the sun
for my zenith.”[8] On the titlepage of his book he describes himself as “of
Cliffords Inne gent.,” which of course he would not have ventured to do had
he not really been what he there claimed to be; for at the time the New
Canaan was published he was living in London and apparently one of the
attorneys of the Council for New England.[9] Bradford, speaking from
memory, fell into an error, therefore, when he described him as a “kind of
petie-fogger of Furnefells Inne.”[10] That in 1625 he was a man of some
means is evident from the fact that he owned an interest in the Wollaston
venture; though here again Bradford takes pains to say that the share he
represented (“of his owne or other mens”) was small, and that he himself
had so little respect amongst the rest that he was slighted by even the
meanest servants.
In all probability this was not Morton’s first visit to Massachusetts Bay.
Indeed, he was comparatively familiar with it, having already passed one
season on its shores. His own statement, at the beginning of the first chapter
of the second book of the Canaan, seems to be conclusive on this point. He
there says: “In the month of June, Anno Salutis 1622, it was my chance to
arrive in the parts of New England with thirty servants, and provision of all
sorts fit for a plantation; and, while our houses were building, I did
endeavor to take a survey of the country.”[11] There was but one ship which
arrived in New England in June, 1622, and that was the Charity;[12] and the
Charity brought out Weston’s party, which settled at Wessagusset,
answering in every respect to Morton’s description of the party he came
with. Andrew Weston, a younger brother of the chief promoter of the
enterprise, had then come in charge of it, and is described as having been “a
heady yong man and violente.”[13] After leaving Weston’s company at

Page 19

Plymouth, the Charity went on to Virginia, but returned from there early in
October, going it would seem directly to Boston Bay and Wessagusset.[14]
One part of the colonists had then been there three months, and it was
during those three months that Morton apparently took the survey of the
country to which he refers. As the Wessagusset plantation was now left
under the charge of Richard Greene, it would seem that young Weston went
back to England in the Charity, and the inference is that Morton, who had
come out as his companion, went back with him.
In any event, the impression produced on Morton by this first visit to New
England was a strong and favorable one. It looked to him a land of plenty, a
veritable New Canaan. Accordingly, he gave vent to his enthusiasm in the
warm language of the first chapter of his second book.[15] With the
subsequent fate of Weston’s party he seems to have had no connection. He
must at the time have heard of it, and was doubtless aware of the evil
reputation that company left behind. This would perfectly account for the
fact that he never mentions his having himself had anything to do with it.
Yet it may be surmised that he returned to England possessed with the idea
of connecting himself with some enterprise, either Weston’s or another,
organized to make a settlement on the shores of Boston Bay and there to
open a trade in furs. He had then had no experience of a New England
winter; though, for that matter, when he afterwards had repeated
experiences of it, they in no way changed his views of the country. To the
last, apparently, he thought of it as he first saw it during the summer and
early autumn of 1622, when it was a green fresh wilderness, nearly devoid
of inhabitants and literally alive with game.
News of the utter failure of Weston’s enterprise must have reached London
in the early summer of 1623. Whether Morton was in any way personally
affected thereby does not appear, though from his allusions to Weston’s
treatment by Robert Gorges at Plymouth, during the winter of 1623-4, it is
not at all improbable that he was.[16] During the following year (1624) he is
not heard of; but early in 1625 he had evidently succeeded in effecting
some sort of a combination which resulted in the Wollaston expedition.
The partners in this enterprise would seem to have been the merest
adventurers. So far as can be ascertained, they did not even trouble
themselves to take out a patent for the land on which they proposed to

Page 20

settle,[17] in this respect showing themselves even more careless than
Weston.[18] With the exception of Morton, they apparently had no practical
knowledge of the country, and their design clearly was to establish
themselves wherever they might think good, and to trade in such way as
they saw fit.
When the party reached its destination in Massachusetts Bay, they found
Wessagusset still occupied by such as were left of Robert Gorges’s
company, who had then been there nearly two years. They had necessarily,
therefore, to establish themselves elsewhere. A couple of miles or so north
of Wessagusset, on the other side of the Monatoquit, and within the limits
of what is now the town of Quincy, was a place called by the Indians
Passonagessit. The two localities were separated from each other not only
by the river, which here widens out into a tidal estuary, but by a broad basin
which filled and emptied with every tide, while around it were extensive
salt marshes intersected by many creeks. The upland, too, was interspersed
with tangled swamps lying between gravel ridges. At Passonagessit the
new-comers established themselves, and the place is still known as Mount
Wollaston.
In almost all respects Passonagessit was for their purpose a better locality
than Wessagusset. They had come there to trade. However it may have been
with the others, in Morton’s calculations at least the plantation must have
been a mere incident to the more profitable dealing in peltry. A prominent
position on the shore, in plain view of the entrance to the bay, would be
with him an important consideration. This was found at Passonagessit. It
was a spacious upland rising gently from the beach and, a quarter of a mile
or so from it, swelling into a low hill.[19] It was not connected with the
interior by any navigable stream, but Indians coming from thence would
easily find their way to it; and, while a portion of the company could always
be there ready to trade, others of them might make excursions to all points
on the neighboring coast where furs were to be had. Looking seaward, on
the left of the hill was a considerable tidal creek; in front of it, across a clear
expanse of water a couple of miles or so in width, lay the islands of the
harbor in apparently connected succession. Though the anchoring grounds
among these islands afforded perfect places of refuge for vessels,
Passonagessit itself, as the settlers there must soon have realized, labored,
as a trading-point, under one serious disadvantage. There was no deep water

Page 21

near it. Except when the tide was at least half full, the shore could be
approached only in boats. On the other hand, so far as planting was
concerned, the conditions were favorable. The soil, though light, was very
good; and the spot, lying as it did close to “the Massachusetts fields,” had
some years before been cleared of trees by the Sachem Chickatawbut, who
had made his home there.[20] He had, however, abandoned it at the time
when the great pestilence swept away his tribe, and tradition still points out
a small savin-covered hummock, near Squantum, on the south side of the
Neponset, as his subsequent dwelling-place. Morton says that
Chickatawbut’s mother was buried at Passonagessit, and that the Plymouth
people, on one of their visits, incurred his enmity by despoiling her grave of
its bear skins.[21] So far as the natives were concerned, however, any settlers
on the shores of Boston Bay, after the year 1623, had little cause for
disquietude. They were a thoroughly crushed and broken-spirited race. The
pestilence had left only a few hundred of the whole Massachusetts tribe,
and in 1631 Chickatawbut had but some fifty or sixty followers.[22] It was a
dying race; and what little courage the pestilence had left them was
effectually and forever crushed out by Miles Standish, when at
Wessagusset, in April, 1623, he put to death seven of the strongest and
boldest of their few remaining men.
Having selected a site, Wollaston and his party built their house nearly in
the centre of the summit of the hill, on a gentle westerly slope. It
commanded towards the north and east an unbroken view of the bay and all
the entrances to it; while on the opposite or landward side, some four or five
miles away, rose the heavily-wooded Blue Hills. Across the bay to the north
lay Shawmut, beyond the intervening peninsulas of Squantum and
Mattapan. Wessagusset was to the south, across the marshes and creeks, and
hidden from view by forest and uplands.

Page 22

Mount Wollaston.[23]
During their first season, the summer of 1625, Wollaston’s party must have
been fully occupied in the work of building their houses and laying out their
plantation. The winter followed. A single experience of a winter on that
shore seems to have sufficed for Captain Wollaston, as it had before
sufficed for Captain Gorges. He apparently came to the conclusion that
there was little profit and no satisfaction for him in that region.
Accordingly, during the early months of 1626, he determined to go
elsewhere. The only account of what now ensued is that contained in
Bradford; for Morton nowhere makes a single allusion to Wollaston or any
of his associates, nor does he give any account of the origin, composition or
purposes of the Wollaston enterprise. His silence on all these points is,
indeed, one of the singular features in the New Canaan. Such references as
he does make are always to Weston and Weston’s attempt;[24] and he seems
to take pains to confound that attempt with Wollaston’s. Once only he
mentions the number of the party with which he landed,[25] and the fact that
it was subsequently dissolved;[26] but how it came to be dissolved he does
not explain. The inference from this is unavoidable. Morton was free
enough in talking of what he did and saw at Passonagessit, of his revels
there, of how he was arrested, and persecuted out of the country. That he
says not a word of Wollaston or his other partners must be due to the fact
that the subject was one about which he did not care to commit himself.
Nevertheless Bradford could not but have known the facts, for not only at a
later day was Morton himself for long periods of time at Plymouth, but

Page 23

when the events of which he speaks occurred Bradford must have been
informed of them by the Wessagusset people, as well as by Fitcher. As we
only know what Bradford tells us, it can best be given in his own words:—
“Having continued there some time, and not finding things to
answer their expectations, nor profit to arise as they looked for,
Captain Wollaston takes a great part of the servants and
transports them to Virginia, where he puts them off at good
rates, selling their time to other men; and writes back to one Mr.
Rasdall, one of his chief partners and accounted their merchant,
to bring another part of them to Virginia likewise; intending to
put them off there, as he had done the rest. And he, with the
consent of the said Rasdall, appointed one Fitcher to be his
Lieutenant, and govern the remains of the plantation till he, or
Rasdall, returned to take further order thereabout. But this
Morton, abovesaid, having more craft than honesty, in the
others’ absence watches an opportunity, (commons being but
hard amongst them,) and got some strong drink and other
junkets, and made them a feast; and after they were merry, he
began to tell them he would give them good counsel. ‘You see,’
saith he, ‘that many of your fellows are carried to Virginia; and
if you stay till this Rasdall returns, you will also be carried away
and sold for slaves with the rest. Therefore, I would advise you
to thrust out this Lieutenant Fitcher; and I, having a part in the
plantation, will receive you as my partners and consociates. So
may you be free from service; and we will converse, trade, plant
and live together as equals, and support and protect one
another:’ or to like effect. This counsel was easily received, so
they took opportunity and thrust Lieutenant Fitcher out a-doors,
and would suffer him to come no more amongst them; but
forced him to seek bread to eat, and other relief, from his
neighbors, till he could get passage for England.”[27]
Wollaston’s process of depletion to Virginia had reduced the number of
servants at Passonagessit from thirty or thirty-five, as Morton variously
states it,[28] to six at most.[29] It was as the head of these that Morton
established himself in control at Merry-Mount, as he called the place,[30]
sometime, it would seem, in the summer of 1626. He had now two distinct

Page 24

objects in view: one was enjoyment, the other was profit; and apparently he
was quite reckless as to the methods he pursued in securing either the one
or the other. If he was troubled by his former partners appearing to assert
their rights, as he probably was, no mention is made of it. There were no
courts to appeal to in America, and those of Europe were far away; nor
would it have been easy or inexpensive to enforce their process in New
England. Accordingly nothing more is heard of Wollaston or Rasdall,
though Bradford does say that Morton was “vehemently suspected for the
murder of a man that had adventured moneys with him when he first
came.”[31] There is a vague tradition, referred to John Adams, that
Wollaston was subsequently lost at sea;[32] but as a full century must have
elapsed between the occurrence of the event and the birth of John Adams,
this tradition is quite as unreliable as traditions usually are.
Passionately fond of field sports, Morton found ample opportunity for the
indulgence of his tastes in New England. He loved to ramble through the
woods with his dog and gun, or sail in his boat on the bay. The Indians, too,
were his allies, and naturally enough; for not only did he offer them an open
and easy-going market for their furs, but he was companionable with them.
They shared in his revels. He denies that he was in the habit of selling them
spirits,[33] but where spirits were as freely used as Morton’s account shows
they were at Merry-Mount, the Indians undoubtedly had their share. Nor
were his relations confined to the Indian men. The period of Elizabeth and
James I. was one of probably as much sexual incontinency as any in
English history. Some of the earlier writers on the New England Indians
have spoken of the modesty of the women,—Wood, in his Prospect, for
instance, and Josselyn, in the second of his Two Voyages.[34] Morton,
however, is significantly silent on this point, and the idea of female chastity
in the Indian mind, in the rare cases where it existed at all, seems to have
been of the vaguest possible description.[35] Morton was not a man likely to
be fastidious, and his reference to the “lasses in beaver coats”[36] is
suggestive. Merry-Mount was unquestionably, so far as temperance and
morality were concerned, by no means a commendable place.[37]
Morton’s inclination to boisterous revelry culminated at last in that
proceeding which scandalized the Plymouth elders and has passed into
history. In the spring of 1627 he erected the May-pole of Merry-Mount. To

Page 25

erect these poles seems at that time to have been a regular English
observance, which even the fishermen on the coast did not neglect. When,
for instance, the forerunners of Weston’s colony at Wessagusset reached the
Damariscove Islands, in the spring of 1622, the first thing they saw was a
May-pole, which the men belonging to the ships there had newly set up,
“and weare very mery.”[38] There is no room for question that in England,
during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, May-day festivities were
associated with a great deal of license. They were so associated in the minds
of Governor Bradford and his fellows. Christmas was at least a Christian
festivity. Not so May-day. That was distinctly Pagan in its origin. It
represented all there was left of the Saturnalia and the worship of the
Roman courtesan. May-day and May-day festivities, accordingly, were
things to be altogether reformed. They were by no means the innocent,
grateful welcoming of spring which modern admirers of the so-called good
old times—which, in point of fact, were very gross and brutal times—are
wont to picture to themselves. “I have heard it credibly reported,” wrote
Stubbes in his Anatomy of Abuses, “(and that viva voce) by men of great
gravitie, credite and reputation, that of fourtie, three score, or a hundred
maides goyng to the woode over night [a-Maying], there have scarcely the
thirde parte of them returned home againe undefiled.”[39] All this it is
necessary to now bear in mind, lest what Bradford wrote down in his
history of Morton’s doings should seem grotesque. He was speaking of
what represented in his memory a period of uncleanness, a sort of carnival
of the sexes.
Morton’s own account of the festivities at Merry-Mount on the May-day of
1627, which came on what would now be the 11th of the month, will be
found in the fourteenth chapter of the third book of the Canaan.[40] It does
not need to be repeated here. Bradford’s account was very different:
“They allso set up a May-pole, drinking and dancing aboute it
many days togeather, inviting the Indean women, for their
consorts, dancing and frisking togither, (like so many fairies, or
furies rather,) and worse practises. As if they had anew revived
and celebrated the feasts of the Roman Goddes Flora, or the
beasly practieses of the madd Bacchinalians. Morton likwise (to
shew his poetrie,) composed sundry rimes and verses, some
tending to lasciviousnes, and others to the detraction and

Page 26

scandall of some persons, which he affixed to this idle or idoll
May-polle.”[41]
Morton’s verses can be found in their proper place in the New Canaan, but
the principal charge now to be made against them is their
incomprehensibility. Judged even by the standard of the present day, much
more by that of the day when they were written, they are not open to
criticism because of their “lasciviousnes.” They are decent enough, though
very bad and very dull. As to the “detraction and scandall of some persons,”
alleged against them,—if indeed they contained anything of the sort,—it
was so very carefully concealed that no one could easily have understood it
then, and Morton’s own efforts at explanation fail to make it intelligible
now.
The festivities around the May-pole were, however, but Morton’s
amusements. Had he confined himself to these he might, so far as the
people at Plymouth at least were concerned, to the end of his life have lived
on the shores of Boston Bay, and erected a new pole with each recurring
spring. The only resistance he would have had to overcome would have
been a remonstrance now and then, hardly less comical than it was earnest.
The business methods he pursued were a more serious matter. He had come
to New England to make money, as well as to enjoy the license of a frontier
life. He was fully alive to the profits of the peltry trade, and in carrying on
that trade he was restrained by no scruples. The furs of course came from
the interior, brought by Indians. In his dealings with the Indians Morton
adopted a policy natural enough for one of his reckless nature, but which
imperilled the existence of every European on the coast. The two things the
savages most coveted were spirits and guns,—fire-water and fire-arms.
Beads and knives and hatchets and colored cloth served very well to truck
with at first. But these very soon lost their attraction. Guns and rum never
did. For these the Indians would at any time give whatever they possessed.
The trade in fire-arms had already attained some proportions when, in 1622,
it was strictly forbidden by a proclamation of King James, issued at the
instance of the Council for New England. The companion trade in spirits,
less dangerous to the whites but more destructive to the savages, was
looked upon as scandalous, but it was not prohibited. Morton cared equally
little for either law or morals. He had come to New England for furs, and he
meant to get them.

Page 27

“Hearing what gain the French and fishermen made by trading
of pieces, powder and shot to the Indians, he, as the head of this
consortship, began the practice of the same in these parts. And
first he taught them how to use them, to charge and discharge,
and what proportion of powder to give the piece, according to
the size and bigness of the same; and what shot to use for fowl
and what for deer. And having thus instructed them, he
employed some of them to hunt and fowl for him, so as they
became far more active in that employment than any of the
English, by reason of their swiftness of foot and nimbleness of
body; being also quick sighted, and by continual exercise well
knowing the haunts of all sorts of game. So as when they saw
the execution that a piece would do, and the benefit that might
come by the same, they became mad, as it were, after them, and
would not stick to give any price they could attain to for them;
accounting their bows and arrows but bawbles in comparison of
them.”[42]
This was Bradford’s story, nor does Morton deny it. That he would have
denied it if he could is apparent. The practices complained of were
forbidden by a royal proclamation, issued at the instance of Sir Ferdinando
Gorges. In his speech in defence of the great patent, before the House of
Commons in Committee of the Whole, in 1621, Gorges had emphatically
dwelt on the sale of arms and ammunition to the savages as an abuse then
practised, which threatened the extinction of the New England settlements.
[43]
Fifteen years later, when he wrote the New Canaan, Morton was a
dependent of Gorges. The fact that he had dealt in fire-arms, in
contemptuous defiance of the proclamation, was openly charged against
him. He did deny that he had sold the savages spirits. These, he said, were
the life of trade; the Indians would “pawn their wits” for them, but these he
would never let them have. In the matter of fire-arms, however, he
preserved a discreet and significant silence. He made no more allusion to
them than he did to Wollaston or his partners at Merry-Mount.
In the whole record of the early Plymouth settlement, from the first
skirmish with the Cape Cod savages, in December, 1620, to the
Wessagusset killing, there is no mention of a gun being seen in an Indian’s
hands. On the contrary, the savages stood in mortal terror of fire-arms. But

Page 28

now at last it seemed as if Morton was about not only to put guns in their
hands, but to instruct them in their use.
“This Morton,” says Bradford, “having thus taught them the use
of pieces, he sold them all he could spare; and he and his
consorts determined to send for many out of England, and had
by some of the ships sent for above a score. The which being
known, and his neighbors meeting the Indians in the woods
armed with guns in this sort, it was a terror unto them, who lived
straglingly, and were of no strength in any place. And other
places (though more remote) saw this mischief would quickly
spread over all, if not prevented. Besides, they saw they should
keep no servants, for Morton would entertain any, how vile
soever, and all the scum of the country, or any discontents,
would flock to him from all places, if this nest was not broken;
and they should stand in more fear of their lives and goods (in
short time) from this wicked and debauched crew than from the
savages themselves.”[44]
Thus, in the only branches of trade the country then afforded, Morton was
not only pressing all the other settlers hard, but he was pressing them in an
unfair way. If the savages could exchange their furs for guns, they would
not exchange them for anything else. Those not prepared to give guns might
withdraw from the market. The business, too, conducted in this way, was a
most profitable one. Morton says that in the course of five years one of his
servants was thought to have accumulated, in the trade in beaver skins, no
less than a thousand pounds;[45] and a thousand pounds in 1635 was more
than the equivalent of ten thousand now. This statement was undoubtedly an
exaggeration; yet it is evident that at even ten shillings a pound in England,
which Morton gives as the current price, though Bradford says he never
knew it less than fourteen, beaver skins, which cost little or nothing in
America, yielded a large profit. As Morton expressed it, his plantation
“beganne to come forward.”[46] When, in 1625, the Plymouth people found
their way up into Maine,[47] and first opened a trade with the savages there,
Morton was not slow in following them. In 1628 they established a
permanent station on the Kennebec,[48] yet apparently as early at least as

Page 29

1627, if not in 1626, Morton had forestalled them there, and hindered them
of a season’s furs.[49]
The injury done to the other settlers in a trading point of view, however,
serious as it unquestionably was, became insignificant in comparison with
the consequences which must result to them from the presence on the coast
of such a resort as Merry-Mount. The region was vast, and in it there was
no pretence of any government. It was the yearly rendezvous of a rough and
lawless class of men, only one step removed from freebooters, who cared
for nothing except immediate gain. Once let such a gathering-place as that
of which Morton was now head become fixed and known, and soon it
would develop into a nest of pirates. Of this there could be no doubt; the
Plymouth people had good cause for the alarm which Bradford expressed. It
mattered not whether Morton realized the consequences of what he was
doing, or failed to realize them; the result would be the same.
It gradually, therefore, became apparent to all those dwelling along the
coast, from the borders of Maine to Cape Cod, that either the growing
nuisance at Merry-Mount must be abated, or they would have to leave the
country. The course to be pursued in regard to it was, however, not equally
clear. The number of the settlements along the coast had considerably
increased since Wollaston’s arrival.[50] The Hiltons and David Thomson had
established themselves at Dover Neck and Piscataqua as early as 1623; and
sometime in 1625 apparently, Thomson, bringing with him his young wife
and a servant or two, had moved down into Boston Bay, and established
himself, only a mile or two away from Mount Wollaston, on the island
which still bears his name. He had died a little while after, and in 1628 his
widow was living there alone, with one child and some servants. In 1625 or
1626 the Wessagusset settlement had divided. Those of Gorges’s following
who remained there had never been wholly satisfied. It was no place for
trade. Accordingly Blackstone, Maverick and Walford, the two last being
married and taking their wives with them, had moved across the bay, and
established themselves respectively at Shawmut or Boston, at Noddle’s
Island or East Boston, and at Mishawum or Charlestown. Jeffreys, Bursley
and some others had remained at Wessagusset, and were Morton’s
neighbors at that place, whom he says he was in the custom of visiting from
time to time, “to have the benefit of company.”[51] At Hull, already known
by that name,[52] there were the Grays and a few other settlers. These had

Page 30

been joined by Lyford and Oldham and their friends, when the latter were
expelled from Plymouth in the spring of 1625; but the next year, finding the
place probably an uninviting one, Lyford had crossed over to Cape Ann,
and thence a year later passed on to Virginia. Oldham still remained at
Nantasket.
Such were those neighbors of Morton, the chiefs of the straggling
plantations, referred to by Bradford as being of “no strength in any place.”
Together they may possibly have numbered from fifty to an hundred souls.
The Plymouth settlement was, comparatively speaking, organized and
numerous, consisting as it did of some two hundred persons, dwelling in
about forty houses, which were protected by a stockade of nearly half a
mile in length. Nevertheless even there, by the summer of 1627, the alarm
at the increase of fire-arms in the hands of the savages began to be very
great. They had spread “both north and south all the land over,”[53] and it
was computed that the savages now possessed at least sixty pieces. One
trader alone, it was reported, had sold them a score of guns and an hundred
weight of ammunition. Bradford thus takes up the story:—
“So sundry of the chiefs of the straggling plantations, meeting
together, agreed by mutual consent, to solicit those of Plymouth,
(who were then of more strength than them all,) to join with
them to prevent the further growth of this mischief, and suppress
Morton and his consorts before they grew to further head and
strength. Those that joined in this action, (and after contributed
to the charge of sending him to England,) were from Piscataqua,
Naumkeag, Winnisimmet, Wessagusset, Nantasket, and other
places where any English were seated. Those of Plymouth being
thus sought to by their messengers and letters, and weighing
both their reasons and the common danger, were willing to
afford them their help, though themselves had least cause of fear
or hurt. So, to be short, they first resolved jointly to write to
him, and, in a friendly and neighborly way, to admonish him to
forbear these courses; and sent a messenger with their letters to
bring his answer. But he was so high as he scorned all advice,
and asked—Who had to do with him?—he had and would trade
pieces with the Indians in despite of all: with many other
scurrilous terms full of disdain.

Page 31

“They sent to him a second time, and bade him be better
advised, and more temperate in his terms, for the country could
not bear the injury he did; it was against their common safety,
and against the King’s proclamation. He answered in high terms,
as before; and that the King’s proclamation was no law:
demanding, what penalty was upon it? It was answered, more
than he could bear, his Majesty’s displeasure. But insolently he
persisted, and said the King was dead, and his displeasure with
him; and many the like things; and threatened, withal, that if any
came to molest him, let them look to themselves; for he would
prepare for them.”[54]
However it may have been with the position he took as a matter of public
policy, Morton at least showed himself in this dispute better versed in the
law of England than those who admonished him. On the first of the two
points made by him he was clearly right. King James’s proclamation was
not law. This had been definitely decided more than fifteen years before,
when in 1610, in a case referred to all the judges, Lord Coke, in reporting
their decision, had stated on his own authority that “the King cannot create
any offence, by his prohibition or proclamation, which was not an offence
before, for that was to change the law, and to make an offence, which was
not; for ubi non est lex, ibi non est transgressio; ergo, that which cannot be
punished without proclamation cannot be punished with it.”[55]
In regard to the second point made by Morton, that the King’s proclamation
died with him, the same distinction between statutes and proclamations, that
the former were of perpetual obligation until repealed and that the latter lost
their force on the demise of the crown,—this distinction was, a century and
a half later, stated by Hume[56] to have existed in James’s time. Lord Chief
Justice Campbell has, however, exclaimed against the statement as a display
of ignorant “audacity,” and declares that he was unable to find in the
authorities a trace of any such doctrine.[57] On this point, therefore, the law
of Thomas Morton was probably as bad as that of David Hume.
Nevertheless the passage in Bradford affords a curious bit of evidence that
some such distinction as that drawn by Hume, though it may not have got
into the books, did exist in both the legal and the public mind of the first
half of the seventeenth century.

Page 32

Whether Morton’s law on the subject of proclamations was or was not
found mattered little however. It was not then to be debated, as the question
with the settlers was one of self-preservation. The Plymouth magistrates
had gone too far to stop. If they even hesitated, now, there was an end to all
order in New England. Morton would not be slow to realize that he had
faced them down, and his insolence would in future know no bounds.
“So they mutually resolved to proceed, and obtained of the
Governor of Plymouth to send Captain Standish, and some other
aid with him, to take Morton by force. The which accordingly
was done; but they found him to stand stiffly in his defence,
having made fast his doors, armed his consorts, set divers dishes
of powder and bullets ready on the table; and, if they had not
been over armed with drink, more hurt might have been done.
They summoned him to yield, but he kept his house, and they
could get nothing but scoffs and scorns from him; but at length,
fearing they would do some violence to the house, he and some
of his crew came out, but not to yield, but to shoot. But they
were so steeled with drink as their pieces were too heavy for
them; himself, with a carbine (overcharged and almost half
filled with powder and shot, as was after found) had thought to
have shot Captain Standish; but he stept to him, and put by his
piece and took him. Neither was there any hurt done to any of
either side, save that one was so drunk that he ran his own nose
upon the point of a sword that one held before him as he entered
the house; but he lost but a little of his hot blood.”[58]
Morton’s own account of “this outragious riot,” as he calls it, is contained in
the fifteenth chapter of the third book of the New Canaan.[59] It differs
considerably from Bradford’s, but not in essentials. He says that the
occurrence took place in June; and as Bradford’s letters of explanation, sent
with the prisoner to England, are dated the 9th of June,[60] it must have been
quite early in the month. He further says that he was captured in the first
place at Wessagusset, “where by accident they found him;” but escaping
thence during the night, through the carelessness of those set on guard over
him, he made his way in the midst of a heavy thunder-storm to Mount
Wollaston, going up the Monatoquit until he could cross it. The whole
distance from point to point was, for a person familiar with the country,

Page 33

perhaps eight miles. Getting home early the next morning he made his
preparations for resistance in the way described by Bradford. Of the whole
party at Merry-Mount more than half, four apparently, were then absent in
the interior getting furs. This fact, indeed, was probably well known to his
neighbors, who had planned the arrest accordingly. Standish, having eight
men with him, followed Morton round to Mount Wollaston, probably by
water, the morning succeeding his escape; and what ensued seems to have
been sufficiently well described by Bradford. One at least of the Merry-
Mount garrison got extremely tipsy before the attacking party appeared, and
Morton, seeing that resistance was hopeless, surrendered, after in vain
trying to make some terms for himself.
Having been arrested he was at once carried to Plymouth, and a council was
held there to decide upon the disposition to be made of him. According to
his own account certain of the magistrates, among whom he specially
names Standish, advocated putting him to death at once, and so ending the
matter. They were not in favor of sending him to England. Such a course as
this was, however, wholly out of keeping with the character of the
Plymouth colony, and it is tolerably safe to say that it was never really
proposed. Morton imagined it; but he also circumstantially asserts that
when milder councils prevailed, and it was decided to send him to England,
Standish was so enraged that he threatened to shoot him with his own hand,
as he was put into the boat.[61]
Either because they did not care to keep him at Plymouth until he could be
sent away, or because an outward-bound fishing-vessel was more likely at
that season to be found at the fishing-stations, Morton was almost
immediately sent to the Isles of Shoals. He remained there a month; and of
his experiences during that time he gives a wholly unintelligible account in
the New Canaan.[62] At last a chance offered of sending him out in a
fishing-vessel bound to old Plymouth, England. He went under charge of
John Oldham, who was chosen to represent the associated planters in this
matter, and who carried two letters, in the nature of credentials, prepared by
Governor Bradford, the one addressed to the Council for New England and
the other to Sir Ferdinando Gorges personally.[63] In these letters Bradford
set forth in detail the nature of the offences charged against Morton, and
asked that he might be brought “to his answer before those whom it may
concern.” These letters were signed by the chiefs of the several plantations,

Page 34

at whose common charge the expenses of Oldham’s mission, as well as
Standish’s arrest, were defrayed, and towards this charge they contributed
as follows, though Bradford says the total cost was much more:—
£ s
From Plymouth, 210
„ Naumkeag, 110
„ Piscataqua, 210
„ Wessagusset, 2
„ Nantasket, 110
„ David Thomson’s widow, 15
„ William Blackstone, 12
„ Edward Hilton,[64] 1
£12 7
Oldham and Morton reached Plymouth during the later summer or early
autumn of 1628. They must, therefore, have passed the outward-bound
expedition of Endicott, the forerunners of the great Puritan migration of
1630-7, in mid-ocean, as on the 6th of September the latter reached
Naumkeag. The grant of the Massachusetts Company, which Endicott
represented, had been regularly obtained from the Council for New
England, and bore date the 19th of March, 1628. It covered the sea-front
within the space of three English miles to the northward of the Merrimack
and to the southward of the Charles, “or of any and every part of either of
these streams;” while it extended “from the Atlantick and Western Sea and
Ocean on the East Parte, to the South Sea on the West Parte.” It also
included everything lying within the space of three miles to the southward
of the southernmost part of Massachusetts, by which was meant Boston
Bay.[65] It was clear, therefore, that Mount Wollaston was included in this
grant.
Morton’s establishment was thus brought within Endicott’s government. Its
existence and character must already have been well known in England, and
it is not at all improbable that its suppression had been there decided upon.
Whether this was so or not, however, Endicott certainly learned, as soon as
he landed at Naumkeag, of the action which had been taken three months
before. It commended itself to him; though he doubtless regretted that more

Page 35

condign punishment had not been administered to Morton and his crew on
the spot, and did not delay to take such steps as were still in his power, to
make good what in this respect had been lacking. As Bradford says,
“visiting those parts [he] caused that May-polle to be cutt downe, and
rebuked them for their profannes, and admonished them to looke ther
should be better walking; so they now, or others, changed the name of their
place againe, and called it Mounte-Dagon.”[66]
Morton and Oldham, meanwhile, were in England. As Oldham bore letters
to Gorges and landed at Plymouth, of which place the latter then was and
for many years had been the royal governor, there can be no doubt that
Morton was at once brought before him. As respects New England Gorges’s
curiosity was insatiable. Any one who came from there, whether a savage or
a sea-captain, was eagerly questioned by him; and his collection of charts,
memoirs, letters, journals and memorials, relating to the discovery of those
parts, is said to have been unequalled.[67] Oldham and Morton had lived
there for years. They knew all that was then known about the country and
its resources. They both of them had unlimited faith in its possibilities, and
talked about an hundred per cent profit within the year, as if it were a thing
easily compassed.[68] Talk of this kind Gorges liked to hear. It suited his
temperament; and it would seem not improbable that Morton soon found
this out, and bore himself accordingly.
Meanwhile it was not possible for the Council for New England and the
Massachusetts Company to long move in harmony. The former was an
association of courtiers, and the latter one of Puritans. The Council planned
to create in the New World a score or two of great feudal domains for
English noblemen; the Company proposed to itself a commonwealth there.
Accordingly difficulties between the two at once began to crop out. The
original grant to the Company of March 19, 1628, had been made by the
Council, with the assent of Gorges. The tract already conceded to Robert
Gorges, in 1622, was included in it; but Sir Ferdinando insisted that the
subsequent and larger grant was made with a distinct saving of all rights
vested under the prior one.[69] This the Company was not prepared to admit;
and, as the business of the Council was habitually done in a careless
slipshod way, the record was by no means clear. A question of title,
involving some three hundred square miles of territory in the heart of the
Company’s grant, was therefore raised at once.

Page 36

Captain Robert Gorges meanwhile had died, and the title to his grant had
passed to his brother John. It would seem that Oldham, who was a pushing
man, had come out to England with some scheme of his own for obtaining a
patent from the Council, and organizing a strong trading company to
operate under it. The result was that John Gorges now deeded to him a
portion of the Robert Gorges grant, being the whole region lying between
the Charles and the Saugus rivers, for a distance of five miles from the coast
on the former and three miles on the latter. This deed may and probably did
bear a date, January 10, 1629, similar to that of another deed of a yet larger
tract out of the same grant, which John Gorges executed to Sir William
Brereton. The lands thus conveyed were distinctly within the limits covered
by the grant to the Massachusetts Company, and a serious question of title
was raised. The course now pursued by the Company could not but have
been singularly offensive to Gorges. They outgeneralled him in his own
field of action. They too had friends at court. Accordingly they went
directly to the throne. A royal confirmation of their grant from the Council
was solicited and obtained. On the 4th of March, 1629, King Charles’s
charter of the Massachusetts Company passed the seals.
It now became a race, for the actual possession of the disputed territory,
between the representatives of the Company on the one side and the Gorges
grantees on the other. The former, under advice of counsel, denied the
validity of the Robert Gorges grant of 1622. It was, they claimed, void in
law, being “loose and uncertain.”[70] They instructed Endicott to hurry a
party forward to effect an actual occupation. This he at once did; and the
settlement of Charlestown, in the summer of 1629, was the result.
Meanwhile Oldham, having in vain tried to coax or browbeat the Company
into an arrangement satisfactory to himself, was endeavoring to fit out an
expedition of his own.[71] He had not the means at his disposal; and,
convinced of this at last, he gave up the contest.
At an early stage in these proceedings he would seem to have wholly lost
sight of so much of the business he had in hand as related to Thomas
Morton. Bradford’s expression, in referring to what took place, is that
Morton “foold” Oldham.[72] Morton himself, however, says[73] that Oldham
did the best he could, and tried to set the officers of the law at work, but
was advised that Morton had committed no crime of which the English
courts could take cognizance. He had at most only disregarded a

Page 37

proclamation. All this seems very probable. Nevertheless, for violating a
proclamation, he could at that time have been proceeded against in the Star
Chamber. It is true that in their decision in 1610, already referred to,[74] the
twelve judges had said, “Lastly, if the offence be not punishable in the Star
Chamber, the prohibition of it by proclamation cannot make it punishable
there.”[75] This, however, was the language of the bench in the days of
James, when Coke was Chief Justice. In 1629 the current of opinion was
running strongly in the opposite direction. Sir Nicholas Hyde, as Chief
Justice, was then “setting law and decency at defiance” in support of
prerogative,[76] and a few years later Sir John Finch was to announce “that
while he was Keeper no man should be so saucy as to dispute these orders”
of the Lords of the Council.[77] Law or no law, therefore, Morton could
easily have been held to a severe account in the Star Chamber, had Gorges
been disposed to press matters against him there. He clearly was not so
disposed. The inference, therefore, is that Morton had succeeded in
thoroughly ingratiating himself with Gorges; and Oldham, as he was now a
grantee of Gorges’s son, did not see his account in pressing matters.
Accordingly Bradford’s letters and complaints were quietly ignored; and his
“lord of misrule,” and head of New England’s first “schoole of
Athisme,”[78] escaped without, so far as could be discovered, even a rebuke
for his misdeeds.
Nor was this all. Isaac Allerton was at that time in London, as the agent of
the Plymouth colony. The most important business he had in hand was to
procure a new patent for the Plymouth people, covering by correct bounds a
grant on the Kennebec, with which region they were now opening a
promising trade. They also wanted to secure, if possible, a royal charter for
themselves like that which had just been issued to the Massachusetts
Company. In the matter of the patent, Allerton had to deal with the Council
for New England; the granting of the charter lay at Whitehall. Altogether it
was a troublesome and vexatious business, and the agent soon found that he
could make no headway except through favor. The influence of Gorges
became necessary. In the light of subsequent events it would seem
altogether probable that Morton now made himself useful. At any rate,
when Allerton returned to New England, in 1629, with the patent but
without a charter, he astonished and scandalized the Plymouth community
by bringing Morton back with him. They apparently landed sometime in

Page 38

August,[79] and we have two accounts of Morton’s reception at Plymouth;
one his own, and the other Governor Bradford’s. Both are characteristic.
Morton says that
“Being ship’d againe for the parts of New Canaan, [he] was put
in at Plimmouth in the very faces of them, to their terrible
amazement to see him at liberty; and [they] told him hee had not
yet fully answered the matter they could object against him. Hee
onely made this modest reply, that he did perceave they were
willfull people, that would never be answered: and he derided
them for their practises and losse of laboure.”[80]
Bradford, looking at the transaction from the other point of view, says:—
“Mr. Allerton gave them great and just ofence in bringing over
this year, for base gaine, that unworthy man, and instrumente of
mischeefe, Morton, who was sent home but the year before for
his misdemenors. He not only brought him over, but to the
towne, (as it were to nose them,) and lodged him at his owne
house, and for a while used him as a scribe to doe his
bussines.”[81]
In view of Morton’s escape from all punishment in England, and his return
a little later to Mount Wollaston, Bradford speaks of the trouble and charge
of his arrest as having been incurred “to little effect.”[82] This, however, was
not so. On the contrary, it is not often that an act of government repression
produces effects equally decisive. The nuisance was abated and the danger
dispelled; the fact that there was a power on the coast, ready to assert itself
in the work of maintaining order, was established and had to be recognized;
and, finally, a wholly unscrupulous competitor was driven out of trade.
These results were well worth all that Morton’s arrest cost, and much more.
It does not appear how long Morton now remained at Plymouth. It could
not, however, have been more than a few weeks before Allerton, who
himself went back to England the same season, was, as Bradford puts it,
“caused to pack him away.” He then returned to Mount Wollaston, where he
seems to have found a remnant of his old company,—apparently the more
modest of them and such as had looked to their better walking. Hardly,
however, had he well gotten back when he was in trouble with Endicott.

Page 39

The first difficulty arose out of the jealousy which existed between the “old
planters,” as they were called, and those who belonged to the Massachusetts
Company. The old planters were the very men who had associated
themselves, eighteen months before, to bring about the suppression of the
establishment at Mount Wollaston. Now they also were beginning to feel
the pressure of authority, and they did not like it. In their helpless anger
they even spoke of themselves as “slaves” of the new Company.[83] They
could no longer plant what they chose or trade with whom they pleased.
On these points Endicott had explicit instructions. They were contained in
the letters of Cradock of April 17 and May 28, 1629, which are to be found
in Young’s Chronicles of Massachusetts, and contain the policy of the
company, set forth in clear vigorous English. In pursuance of those
instructions, Endicott seems to have summoned all the old planters dwelling
within the limits of the patent to meet in a General Court at Salem,
sometime in the latter part of 1629. There he doubtless advised them as to
the policy which the Company intended to pursue; and Morton says that he
then tendered all present for signature certain articles which he and the Rev.
Samuel Skelton had drawn up together. The essence of those articles was
that in all causes, ecclesiastical as well as political, the tenor of God’s word
should be followed.[84] The alternative was banishment.
Morton claims that he alone of those present refused to put his hand to this
paper, insisting that a proviso should first be added in these words, “So as
nothing be done contrary or repugnant to the laws of the Kingdom of
England.” These are almost the exact words of King Charles’s charter;[85]
and it would seem as though Morton, in proposing them, sought an
opportunity to display his legal acumen. Whether his suggestion was
adopted, and the articles modified accordingly, does not appear. It probably
was, though the change was not one which Endicott would have looked
upon with favor. If he assented to it he certainly did so grimly. The matter
of regulating the trade in beaver skins was next brought up. This was
intended to be a Company monopoly, to meet the charge of providing
churches and forts.[86] It was accordingly proposed that a sort of general
partnership for the term of one year should be effected to carry it on.
Morton says that on this matter also he stood out, and it seems altogether
probable that he did. It is safe to say that he was there to make whatever
trouble he could. On the other hand it was not possible for Endicott to

Page 40

mistake his instructions. They were as plain as words could make them. He
was to see to it that “none be partakers of [the Company’s] privileges and
profits, but such as be peaceable men, and of honest life and conversation,
and desirous to live amongst us, and conform themselves to good order and
government.” And further, if any factious spirit developed itself he was
enjoined “to suppress a mischief before it take too great a head ... which, if
it may be done by a temperate course, we much desire it, though with some
inconvenience, so as our government and privileges be not brought in
contempt.... But if necessity require a more severe course, when fair means
will not prevail, we pray you to deal as in your discretions you shall think
fittest.” Such instructions as these, in Endicott’s hands to execute, boded ill
for Morton.
Matters soon came to a crisis. Morton paid no regard to the Company’s
trade regulations. The presumption is that he was emboldened to take the
course he now did by the belief that he would find support in England. He
unquestionably was informed as to all the details of the trouble between the
Massachusetts Company and the Council for New England, and knew that
Oldham, whom he by the way speaks of as “a mad Jack in his mood,”[87]
held a grant from John Gorges, and was straining every nerve to come out
and take adverse possession of the territory covered by it. He probably
hoped, day by day, to see Oldham appear at the head of a Gorges
expedition. There is reason to suppose that he was himself at this time an
agent of Gorges,—that, indeed, he had come back to New England as such,
and was playing a part very much like that of a spy. He was certainly in
such correspondence with Sir Ferdinando as the means of communication
permitted, and the confidant of his plans.[88]
When, therefore, he offered all the opposition to Endicott which he dared,
and thwarted him so far as he could, he was not acting for himself alone. He
represented, in a degree at least, what in England was a powerful
combination. Accordingly, with an over-confidence in the result born of his
sanguine faith in the power and influence of his patron, he now seems to
have gone back to the less objectionable of his old courses. He did not
renew the trade in fire-arms and ammunition, for he probably had none to
spare, and experience had taught him how dangerous it was. He did,
however, deal with the savages as he saw fit, and on his own account,
openly expressing his contempt for Endicott’s authority, and doing all he

Page 41

could to excite the jealousy and discontent of the “old planters.”[89] His own
profits at this time were, he says, six and seven fold.
This state of things could not continue. Accordingly, as the year drew to a
close, Endicott made an effort to arrest him. Morton, however, was now on
his guard. Getting wind of what was intended, he concealed his ammunition
and most necessary goods in the forest; and, when the messengers, sent
across the bay to seize him, landed on the beach at the foot of Mount
Wollaston, he was nowhere to be found. He says that they ransacked his
house, and took from it all the provender they could find; but when they
were gone he replenished his supplies with the aid of his gun, and “did but
deride Captain Littleworth, that made his servants snap shorte in a country
so much abounding with plenty of foode for an industrious man.” This
happened about Christmas, 1629.[90]
Could Endicott now have laid hands upon him there can be little room for
doubt that Morton would have been summarily dealt with; but for the
present the deputy-governor’s attention was otherwise occupied. This was
that winter of 1629-30, the famine and sickness of which came so near to
bringing the Salem settlement to a premature end. During that struggle for
existence the magistrate had no time to attend to Morton’s case. But he was
not the man to forget it.
With the following summer the great migration, which was to fix the
character of New England, began. Instead of a vessel fitted out for Oldham
under the patronage of Gorges, the Mary & John, chartered by the
Massachusetts Company and having on board 140 passengers from the
West of England, anchored off Hull on the 30th of May. A fortnight later
Governor Winthrop reached Salem, and on the 17th of June he also came
into Boston Harbor; and Morton, from Mount Wollaston, must have
watched his vessel with anxious eyes as, in full view from his house, it
made its way up the channel to the mouth of the Mystic. He must also have
realized that its appearance in those waters boded him no good.
In a few days more the whole fleet, numbering twelve sail in all, was at
anchor off Charlestown, and the work of discharging passengers was going
actively on. Of these there were nearly a thousand;[91] and now the busy and
fatal summer experience of 1630 was fairly entered upon.

Page 42

For a few weeks longer Morton continued to live undisturbed at Mount
Wollaston. The confusion and bustle of landing, and afterwards the terror
and sense of bereavement which followed hard on pestilence, protected
him. It was not until the 23d of August, or the present 2d of September, that
the magistrates held any formal session. They then met at the great house at
Charlestown,[92] as it would seem, Winthrop, Dudley, Saltonstall, Pynchon,
Bradstreet and others being present. After some more important business
had been disposed of, “It was ordered, that Morton, of Mount Woolison,
should presently be sent for by processe.”[93] Of the circumstances of his
arrest under the warrant thus issued Morton has given no account.
Apparently he felt it was useless to try to evade the messengers, and
resistance was wholly out of the question. At the next session of the
magistrates, held two weeks later, on what would now be the 17th of
September, he was formally arraigned. In addition to those already named
as being at the earlier meeting, Endicott was now present. He had probably
come down from Salem to give his personal attention to Morton’s case. It
must from the outset have been apparent to the prisoner that the tribunal
before which he stood was one from which he had nothing to hope. The
proceedings were in fact summary. It would seem, from his own account of
them,[94] that he endeavored to humble himself, and, that failing, he made a
sort of plea to the jurisdiction of the Court. Neither submission nor plea
produced any effect. On the contrary he was apparently cut short in his
defence and his protest by impatient exclamations, and even bidden to hold
his peace and hearken to his sentence. It appears in the records as
follows:—
“It is ordered by this present Court, that Thomas Morton, of
Mount Walliston, shall presently be sett into the bilbowes, and
after sent prisoner into England, by the shipp called the Gifte,
nowe returning thither; that all his goods shalbe seazed upon to
defray the charge of his transportation, payment of his debts,
and to give satisfaction to the Indians for a cannoe hee unjustly
tooke away from them; and that his howse, after the goods are
taken out, shalbe burnt downe to the ground in the sight of the
Indians, for their satisfaction, for many wrongs hee hath done
them from tyme to tyme.”[95]

Page 43

Unfortunately, Winthrop’s admonitory remarks in imposing this sentence
have not been preserved. There is, however, in the New Canaan, an
expression which apparently formed a part of them.[96] It is that in which it
is assigned as a reason for the destruction of the house at Mount Wollaston,
that “the habitation of the wicked should no more appear in Israel.” In
compliance with the terms of this sentence, Morton was set in the stocks;
and while there, he tells us, the savages came and looked at him, and
wondered what it all meant. He was not, however, sent back to England in
the Gift, as the master of that vessel declined to carry him; for what reason
does not appear. It was not in fact until nearly four months after his arrest
that a passage was secured for him in the Handmaid. Even then, Maverick
afterwards stated that Morton, obdurate to the last, refused to go on board
the vessel, upon the ground that he had no call to go there, and so had to be
hoisted over her side by a tackle.[97] His house also was burned down; but
the execution of this part of his sentence, he asserts,—and his assertion is
confirmed by Maverick,—was vindictively delayed until he was on his way
into banishment, when it was executed rather in his sight, it would seem,
than in that of the savages. Of the voyage to England there is an account in
the New Canaan that is rather more rambling and incoherent than is usual
even with Morton.[98]
The Handmaid appears to have been unseaworthy, and insufficiently
supplied. She had a long and tempestuous passage, in the course of which
Morton came very near starving, no provision having been made for his
subsistence except a very inadequate one out of his own supplies.
The second arrest of Morton was equally defensible with the first.
According to his own account he had systematically made himself a thorn
in Endicott’s side. He had refused to enter into any covenants, whether for
trade or government, and he had openly derided the magistrate and eluded
his messengers. This could not be permitted. He dwelt within the limits of
the Massachusetts charter, and the Company was right when it instructed
Endicott that all living there “must live under government and a like law.” It
was necessary, therefore, that Morton should either give in his adhesion, or
that he should be compelled to take himself off. This, however, was not the
ground which the magistrates took. Nothing was said in the sentence of any
disregard of authority or disobedience to regulation. No reference was made
to any illicit dealings with the Indians, or to the trade in fire-arms. Offences

Page 44

of this kind would have justified the extreme severity of a sentence which
went to the length of ignominious physical punishment, complete
confiscation of property and banishment; leaving only whipping, mutilation
or death uninflicted. No such offences were alleged. Those which were
alleged, on the contrary, were of the most trivial character. They were
manifestly trumped up for the occasion. The accused had unjustly taken
away a canoe from some Indians; he had fired a charge of shot among a
troop of them who would not ferry him across a river, wounding one and
injuring the garments of another; he was “a proud, insolent man” against
whom a “multitude of complaints were received, for injuries done by him
both to the English and the Indians.”[99] Those specified, it may be
presumed, were examples of the rest. They amount to nothing at all, and
were afterwards very fitly characterized by Maverick as mere pretences.
Apparently conscious of this, Dudley, the deputy-governor, in referring to
the matter a few months later in his letter to the Countess of Lincoln, says
that Morton was sent to England “for that my Lord Chief Justice there so
required, that he might punish him capitally for fouler misdemeanors there
perpetrated.” Bradford also, in referring to the matter, states that Morton
was “vehemently suspected” of a murder, and that “a warrant was sent from
the Lord Chief Justice to apprehend him.”[100]
There can be no doubt that there was a warrant from the King’s Bench
against Morton in Winthrop’s hands,[101] but in all probability it was
nothing more nor less than a sort of English lettre de cachet. Morton’s
record in New England was perfectly well known in London at the time
Winthrop was making his preparations to cross. His relations with Oldham
and Gorges must often have been discussed at the assistants’ meetings, and
they were not ignorant of the fact that he had gone back to Plymouth with
Allerton. They must have suspected that he went back as an agent or
emissary of Gorges, and they may have known that he so went back. In any
event, they did not propose to have him live within the limits of their patent.
He was an undesirable character. The warrant, therefore, was probably
obtained in advance, on some vague report or suspicion of a criminal act, to
be at hand and ready for use when needed.[102] It could not legally run into
New England, any more than it could into Scotland or Ireland.[103] Then,
and at no later time, would Winthrop have recognized it in any other case;

Page 45

and, even in this case, no reference is made to it in the colony records. Had
it been so referred to, it might have been cited as a precedent.
Moreover such a requisition, though it might have warranted the return of
Morton to England, certainly did not warrant the confiscation of all his
property and the burning of his house in advance of trial and conviction
there. In point of fact the requisition was a mere pretext and cover. The
Massachusetts magistrates, so far as Morton was concerned, had made up
their minds before he stood at their bar. He was not only a “libertine,” as
they termed it, but he was suspected of being a spy. His presence at Mount
Wollaston they did not consider desirable, and so they proposed to purge the
country of him; and if not in one way, then in another. His case is not
singular in Massachusetts annals; it is merely the first of its kind. It
established a precedent much too often followed thereafter. Morton was one
of those who, as it was expressed in a tract of the time printed in London,
“must have elbow-roome, and cannot abide to be so pinioned with the strict
government in the Commonwealth, or discipline in the church. Now why
should such live there? As Ireland will not brooke venomous beasts, so will
not that land [New England] vile persons and loose livers.”[104]
Many times, in the years which followed, the country was purged of other
of these “vile persons and loose livers,” in much the same way that it was
now purged of Morton. It may, however, well be questioned whether it ever
derived benefit from the process. Certainly Morton’s case was as strong as
any case well could be. There was absolutely nothing to be said in his favor.
He was a lawless, reckless, immoral adventurer. And yet, as the result will
show, in sending Morton back to England, the victim of high-handed
justice, the Massachusetts magistrates committed a serious blunder. They
had much better have left him alone under the harrow of their authority. At
Mount Wollaston he was at worst but a nuisance. They drove him away
from there and sent him back to London; and at Whitehall he became a real
danger. This part of history is now to be told.
Bradford says, and he is generally correct in his statements, that when at
last Morton reached England “he lay a good while in Exeter jail.”[105] There
is no allusion to anything of the sort in the New Canaan; and it would not
seem that he could have been very long a prisoner, as the next assizes and
jail-delivery must have set him free. There could have been nothing on
which to make him stand a trial. Accordingly the following year he was at

Page 46

liberty and busily concerned in Gorges’s intrigues for the overthrow of the
Massachusetts charter.
The house in which Gorges lived—as formerly it had been the point of
gathering of all who had visited the American coast, or could add anything
to the stock of information concerning it—was now the headquarters for
those who had any complaint to make or charges to prefer against the
magistracy of Massachusetts. Acting in concert with Captain John Mason,
the patentee of New Hampshire, he was exerting himself to the utmost to
secure a revocation of King Charles’s charter. The attack was made on the
19th of December, 1632, and it was a formidable one. It assumed the shape
of a petition to the Privy Council, asking the Lords to inquire into the
methods through which the royal charter for the Massachusetts Bay had
been procured, and into the abuses which had been practised under it.
Besides many injuries inflicted on individuals in their property and persons,
the Company was also charged with seditious and rebellious designs,
subversive alike of church and of state. The various allegations were based
on the affidavits of three witnesses,—Thomas Morton, Philip Ratcliff and
Sir Christopher Gardiner. Behind these was the active and energetic
influence of Gorges and Mason.[106]
It is not necessary in this connection to go into any detailed statement of the
wrongs complained of by Ratcliff and Gardiner. They were of the same
nature, though even more pronounced than those of Morton. The country
had in fact been purged of all three of these individuals. The original
document in which they set forth their cases, and made accusation against
the magistrates, has unfortunately been lost. In referring to it afterwards
Winthrop said that it contained “some truths misrepeated.”[107] Apart from
severe judgments on alleged wrong-doers, including whipping, branding,
mutilating, banishment and confiscation of property, the burden of the
accusation lay in the disposition to throw off allegiance to the mother
country, which was distinctly charged against the colony.
A harsh coloring was doubtless given in the petition to whatever could be
alleged. So far as casting off their allegiance to the mother country was
concerned, nothing can be more certain than that neither the leaders nor the
common people of New England entertained at that time any thought of it;
but it is quite equally certain that the leaders at least were deeply
dissatisfied with the course public affairs were then taking in England. They

Page 47

were Puritans, and this was the period of the Star Chamber and the High
Commission. No parliament had been called since 1629, and it was then
publicly announced at Court that no more parliaments were to be called.
There is no reason to suppose that the early settlers of Massachusetts were a
peculiarly reticent race. On the contrary it is well known that they were
much given to delivering themselves and bearing evidence on all occasions;
and in doing so they unquestionably railed and declaimed quite freely
against those then prominent in the council-chamber and among the
bishops. That there was a latent spirit in New England ripe for rebellion was
also, probably, asserted in the lost document. However Winthrop might
deny it, and deny it honestly, this also was true; and subsequent events, both
in Massachusetts and in England, showed it to be so. In the light of their
sympathies and sufferings, Morton and Gardiner probably realized the drift
of what they had heard said and seen done in New England a good deal
better than Winthrop.
The result of the Morton-Gardiner petition was the appointment of a
committee of twelve Lords of the Council, to whom the whole matter was
referred for investigation and report. The committee was empowered to
send for persons and papers and a long and apparently warm hearing
ensued. The friends of the Company found it necessary to at once bestir
themselves. Cradock, Saltonstall and Humfrey filed a written answer to the
complaint, and subsequently, at the hearing, they received efficient aid from
Emanuel Downing, Winthrop’s brother-in-law, and Thomas Wiggin, who
lived at Piscataqua, but now most opportunely chanced to be in London.
At the Court of Charles I. everything was matter of influence or purchase.
The founders of Massachusetts were men just abreast of their time, and not
in advance of it. There is good ground on which to suspect that they did not
hesitate to have recourse to the means then and there necessary to the
attainment of their ends. It has never been explained, for instance, how the
charter of 1629 was originally secured.[108] When Allerton, at the same
time, tried to obtain a similar charter for the Plymouth colony, he found that
he had to buy his way at every step, and Bradford complained bitterly of the
“deale of money veainly and lavishly cast away.”[109] That the original
patentees of Massachusetts bribed some courtier near the King, and through
him bought their charter, is wholly probable. Every one bribed, and almost
every one about the King took bribes. That the patentees had powerful

Page 48

influence at Court is certain; exactly where it lay is not apparent. The Earl
of Warwick interested himself actively in their behalf. It was he who
secured for them their patent from the Council for New England. But
Warwick, though a powerful nobleman, was “a man in no grace at Court;”
on the contrary, he was one of those “whom his Majesty had no esteem of,
or ever purposed to trust.”[110] Winthrop says that in the Morton-Gardiner
hearing his brother-in-law, Emanuel Downing, was especially serviceable.
[111]
Downing was a lawyer of the Inner Temple.[112] There is reason to
suppose that he had access to influential persons,—possibly Lord
Dorchester may have been amongst them.[113] However this may be,
whether by means of influence or bribery, the hearing before the Committee
of the Privy Council was made to result disastrously for the complainants.
Gorges took nothing by his motion. In due time the Committee reported
against any interference with the Company at that time. Such grounds of
complaint as did not admit of explanation they laid to the “faults or fancies
of particular men,” and these, they declared, were “in due time to be
inquired into.” King Charles himself also had evidently been labored with
through the proper channels, and not without effect. Not only did he give
his approval to the report of the Committee, but he went out of his way to
further threaten with condign punishment those “who did abuse his
governor and the plantation.”
Gorges’s carefully prepared attack had thus ended in complete failure. The
danger, however, had been great, nor was its importance underestimated in
Massachusetts. This clearly appears in Winthrop’s subsequent action; for
when, four months later, in May, 1633, information of the final action of the
Council reached him, he wrote a letter of grave jubilation to Governor
Bradford, giving him the glad news, and inviting him to join “in a day of
thanksgiving to our mercifull God, who, as he hath humbled us by his late
correction, so he hath lifted us up, by an abundante rejoysing in our
deliverance out of so desperate a danger.”[114]
Though badly defeated, and for the time being no doubt discouraged,
Gorges and Morton were not disposed to desist from their efforts. As the
latter expressed it, they had been too eager, and had “effected the business
but superficially.”[115] They had also committed the serious mistake of
underestimating the strength and influence of their antagonists. If Gorges,
however, was at home anywhere, he was at home just where he had now

Page 49

received his crushing defeat,—in the antechambers of the palace. All his life
he had been working through Court influences. Through them, after the
Essex insurrection, he had saved his neck from the block. If Court influence
would have availed to secure it, in 1623 he would have pre-empted the
whole territory about Boston Bay as the private domain of himself and his
descendants. At Whitehall he was an enemy not lightly to be disregarded;
and this Winthrop and his colleagues soon had cause to realize.
Thwarted by strong influences in one direction, Gorges went to work to
secure stronger influences in another direction. He knew the ground, and his
plan of operations was well conceived. To follow it out in detail is not
possible. Here and there a fact appears; the rest is inference and surmise.
The King was the objective point. Of him it is not necessary here to speak
at length, for his character is too well understood. Dignified in his bearing,
and in personal character purer than his times,—a devout, well-intentioned
man,—Charles was a shallow, narrow-minded bigot, with a diseased belief
in that divinity which doth hedge a king. He would have made an ideal,
average English country gentleman. After the manner of small, obstinate
men, he believed intensely in a few things. One was his own royal
supremacy and his responsibility, not to his people but to his kingship. He
was nothing of a statesman, and as a politician he was his own worst
enemy. His idea of government was the Spanish one: the king had a prime-
minister, and that prime-minister was the king’s other and second self. In
Charles’s case Buckingham was at first prime-minister; and, when
Buckingham was assassinated, he was in due time succeeded by Laud.
Abbot, Archbishop of Canterbury, had not died until August 4, 1633, and a
few days later Laud was appointed to succeed him. He thus became primate
almost exactly eight months after the first attack on the charter. It was
through him that Gorges now went to work to influence the King and to
control the course of events in New England. His method can be explained
in four words: Laud hated a Puritan.
At first the secret connection of Gorges and Morton with the events which
now ensued is matter of pure surmise. There is no direct evidence of it in
the records or narratives. At a later period it becomes more apparent. As a
matter of surmise, however, based on the subsequent development of
events, it seems probable that in February, 1634, the attention of the
Archbishop, and through him that of the Privy Council, was called to the

Page 50

large emigration then going on to New England of “persons known to be ill-
affected and discontented, as well with the civil as ecclesiastical
government.”[116] As Gorges himself expressed it, “numbers of people of all
sorts flocked thither in heaps.”[117] Several vessels, already loaded with
passengers and stores, were then lying in the Thames. An Order in Council
was forthwith issued staying these vessels, and calling upon Cradock to
produce the Company’s charter. So far as the vessels were concerned it soon
appeared that the Company was still not without friends in the Council; and,
“for reasons best known to their Lordships,” they were permitted to sail.[118]
Doubtless this detention, as the subsequent more rigid restraint, was
“grounded upon the several complaints that came out of those parts of the
divers sects and schisms that were amongst them, all contemning the public
government of the ecclesiastical state.” Ratcliff was now looked upon as a
lunatic,[119] and Gardiner had disappeared. Morton alone remained; and it is
safe to surmise that he was the fountain-head of these complaints, as Gorges
was the channel which conveyed them to Laud. As respects the charter,
Cradock made reply to the order for its production that it was not in his
hands,—that Winthrop, four years before, had taken it to New England. He
was directed to send for it at once. Here the matter rested, and to all
appearances Gorges had met with one more check. The release of the
vessels was ordered on the last day of February, 1634.
A new move on the chess-board was now made by some one. Who that
some-one was is again matter of surmise. Hitherto the few matters which
from time to time came up, relating to the colonies, had been considered in
the full Privy Council. There the Massachusetts Company had shown itself
a power. Special tribunals, however, were at this juncture greatly in vogue
at Whitehall. The Council of the North, the Star Chamber, the Court of High
Commission, were in full operation. To them all political work was
consigned, and in the two last Laud was supreme. Up to this time, however,
the need of any special tribunal to look after the affairs of the colonies had
not made itself felt. The historians of New England have philosophized a
great deal over the considerations of state which, during the reign of
Charles, dictated the royal policy towards New England;[120] but it is more
than doubtful whether considerations of state had anything to do with that
policy. The remoteness and insignificance of early New England, so far as
the English Court was concerned, is a thing not easy now to realize. It may

Page 51

be taken for certain that King and Primate rarely gave a thought to it, much
less matured a definite or rational policy. Their minds were full of more
important matters. They were intent on questions of tonnage and poundage,
on monopolies, and all possible ways and means of raising money; they
were thinking of the war with Spain, of Wentworth’s Irish policy, of the
English opposition, and the Scotch church system. So far as New England
was concerned they were mere puppets to be jerked to and fro by the strings
of Court influence,—now granting a charter at the instance of one man, and
then restraining vessels at the instance of another,—defending “our
governor” one day, and threatening to have his ears cropped the next.
In certain quarters it seems now, however, to have been decided that this
condition of affairs was to continue no longer. A special tribunal should be
created, to take charge of all colonial matters. This move seems to have
grown out of the Order in Council of February 21, and to have been
directed almost exclusively to the management of affairs in New England,
whence complaint mainly came. Accordingly, on the 10th of April, a
commission passed the great seal establishing a board with almost
unlimited power of regulating plantations. Laud was at the head of it. There
would seem to be every reason to assume that this tribunal was created at
the suggestion of Laud, and in consequence of the undecided course
pursued by the Council as a whole, two months before, in the matter of the
detained vessels. A further inference, from what went before and what
followed, is that Laud’s action was stimulated and shaped by Gorges. He
was the active promoter of complaints and scandals from New England. In
other words, the organization of this colonial board, through Laud’s
influence and with Laud supreme in it, was Gorges’s first move in the next
and most formidable attack on the charter of the Massachusetts Bay.
The plan now matured by Gorges was a large one. He had no idea of being
balked of the prize which it had been the dream and the effort of his life to
secure. He meant yet to grasp a government for himself, and an inheritance
for his children, in New England. So far as the settlement of that country
was concerned, what he for thirty years had been vainly ruining himself to
bring about was now accomplishing itself; but it was accomplishing itself
not only without his aid, but in a way which gravely threatened his interests.
The people who were swarming to New England refused to recognize his
title, and abused and expelled his agents. It was clear that the Council for

Page 52

New England was not equal to dealing with such a crisis. It was necessary
to proceed through some other agency. The following scheme was,
therefore, step by step devised.
The territory held under the great patent of the Council for New England
extended from Maine to New Jersey. This whole region was, by the action
of the Council, to be divided in severalty among its remaining members,
and the patent was then to be surrendered to the King, who thereupon was
to confirm the division just made.[121] The Council being thus gotten out of
the way, the King was to assume the direct government of the whole
territory, and was to appoint a governor-general for it. Sir Ferdinando
Gorges was to be that governor-general.[122] He would thus go out to his
province clothed with full royal authority; and the issue would then be, not
between the settlers of Massachusetts, acting under the King’s charter, and
that “carcass in a manner breathless,” the Council for New England, but
between a small body of disobedient subjects and the King’s own
representative. The scheme was a well-devised one. It was nothing more
nor less than the colonial or New England branch of Strafford’s
“Thorough.” It was a part, though a small part, of a great system.
The first step in carrying out the programme was to secure the appointment
of the Commission of April 10. The influence of the Archbishop being
assured, there was no difficulty in this. The board was composed of twelve
members of the Privy Council. Laud himself was at the head of it, and with
him were the Archbishop of York, the Earls of Portland, Manchester,
Arundel and Dorset, Lord Cottington, Sir Thomas Edmunds, Sir Henry
Vane, and Secretaries Cooke and Windebank. Any five or more of these
Commissioners were to constitute a quorum, and their powers were of the
largest description. They could revoke all charters previously granted,
remove governors and appoint others in the places of those removed, and
even break up settlements if they deemed it best so to do. They could inflict
punishment upon all offenders, either by imprisonment, “or by loss of life
or member.” It was in fact a commission of “right divine.” It embodied the
whole royal policy of King Charles, as formulated by Wentworth and
enforced by Laud. The new Commission was not slow in proceeding to its
appointed work, and the potency of Gorges’s influence in it was shown by
his immediate designation as governor-general.[123] How close Morton then
stood to him may be inferred from the following letter, which shows also

Page 53

that he was well informed as to all that was going on.[124] It was written
exactly three weeks after the appointment of the Commission, and was
addressed to William Jeffreys at Wessagusset:—
My very good Gossip,—If I should commend myself to you,
you reply with this proverb,—Propria laus fordet in ore: but to
leave impertinent salute, and really to proceed.—You shall
hereby understand, that, although, when I was first sent to
England to make complaint against Ananias and the brethren, I
effected the business but superficially, (through the brevity of
time,) I have at this time taken more deliberation and brought
the matter to a better pass. And it is thus brought about, that the
King hath taken the business into his own hands. The
Massachusetts Patent, by order of the council, was brought in
view; the privileges there granted well scanned upon, and at the
council board in public, and in the presence of Sir Richard
Saltonstall and the rest, it was declared, for manifest abuses
there discovered, to be void. The King hath reassumed the
whole business into his own hands, appointed a committee of
the board, and given order for a general governor of the whole
territory to be sent over. The commission is passed the privy
seal, I did see it, and the same was 1 mo. Maii sent to the Lord
Keeper to have it pass the great seal for confirmation; and I now
stay to return with the governor, by whom all complainants shall
have relief:[125] So that now Jonas being set ashore may safely
cry, repent you cruel separatists, repent, there are as yet but forty
days. If Jove vouchsafe to thunder, the charter and kingdom of
the separatists will fall asunder. Repent you cruel schismatics,
repent.[126] These things have happened, and I shall see,
(notwithstanding their boasting and false alarms in the
Massachusetts, with feigned cause of thanksgiving,) their
merciless cruelty rewarded, according to the merit of the fact,
with condign punishment for coming into these parts, like
Sampson’s foxes with fire-brands at their tails.[127] The King
and Council are really possessed of their preposterous loyalty
and irregular proceedings, and are incensed against them: and
although they be so opposite to the catholic axioms, yet they

Page 54

will be compelled to perform them, or at leastwise, suffer them
to be put in practice to their sorrow. In matter of restitution and
satisfaction, more than mystically, it must be performed visibly,
and in such sort as may be subject to the senses in a very lively
image. My Lord Canterbury having, with my Lord Privy Seal,
caused all Mr. Cradock’s letters to be viewed, and his apology in
particular for the brethren here, protested against him and Mr.
Humfrey, that they were a couple of imposterous knaves; so
that, for all their great friends, they departed the council
chamber in our view with a pair of cold shoulders. I have staid
long, yet have not lost my labor, although the brethren have
found their hopes frustrated; so that it follows by consequence, I
shall see my desire upon mine enemies: and if John Grant had
not betaken him to flight, I had taught him to sing clamavi in the
Fleet before this time, and if he return before I depart, he will
pay dear for his presumption. For here he finds me a second
Perseus: I have uncased Medusa’s head, and struck the brethren
into astonishment. They find, and will yet more to their shame,
that they abuse the word and are to blame to presume so much,
—that they are but a word and a blow to them that are without.
Of these particulars I thought good, by so convenient a
messenger, to give you notice, lest you should think I had died
in obscurity, as the brethren vainly intended I should, and basely
practised, abusing justice by their sinister practices, as by the
whole body of the committee, una voce, it was concluded to be
done, to the dishonor of his majesty. And as for Ratcliffe, he was
comforted by their lordships with the cropping of Mr.
Winthrop’s ears: which shows what opinion is held amongst
them of King Winthrop with all his inventions and his
Amsterdam fantastical ordinances, his preachings, marriages,
and other abusive ceremonies, which do exemplify his
detestation to the Church of England, and the contempt of his
majesty’s authority and wholesome laws, which are and will be
established in these parts, invitâ Minervâ. With these I thought
fit to salute you, as a friend, by an epistle, because I am bound
to love you, as a brother, by the gospel, resting your loving
friend.

Page 55

THOMAS MORTON.[128]
Dated 1 Mo. Maii, 1634.
Morton is always confused and inaccurate in his statements, and this letter
afforded no exception to the rule. It is impossible to be quite sure of what
particular occasions he refers to in it. He may in the same breath be
speaking of different things. Whether, for instance, the hearing to which he
alludes, at which the patent “was brought in view,” was the same or another
meeting from that in which Cradock’s letters were produced, is not clear. It
would seem as though he were speaking of the February hearing before the
whole Council, and yet he may be describing a subsequent hearing in April
before the Lords Commissioners. He speaks of the “council chamber” and
of “the whole body of the Committee,” and then alludes to the presence of
Saltonstall, Humfrey and Cradock. Now these persons were before the
Council in the hearing of 1632, and they may all of them, as Cradock
certainly was, have been before it in February 1634; but Humfrey could
hardly have appeared before the Lords Commissioners, as he seems to have
sailed for New England early in the month during which they were
appointed. The meeting which Morton describes, therefore, was probably
that of February 28, 1634; and it would seem to have savored strongly of
the Star Chamber and High Commission. Cradock and Humfrey were
apparently scolded and abused by Laud in the style for which he was
famous, and the admission by the former, that the charter had gone to
America, had led to his being called “an imposterous knave,” and sharply
told to send for it back at once. The well-known foibles of the Primate had
been skilfully played upon by accounts of Winthrop’s “Amsterdam
fantastical ordinances, his preachings, marriages, and other abusive
ceremonies;” and they had much the effect that a red flag is known to have
on a bull. Nothing was now heard of the King’s intention of severely
punishing those who abused “his governor;” but, on the contrary, Ratcliffe
was “comforted with the cropping of Mr. Winthrop’s ears.” Gorges was
governor-general, and with him Morton expected soon to depart.
Cradock’s letter, enclosing the order of the Council for the return of the
charter, reached Boston in July. Winthrop was then no longer governor,
having been displaced by Dudley at the previous May election. As is well
known to all students of New England history, the famous parchment, still
in the office of the secretary of the Puritan Commonwealth, was not sent

Page 56

back.[129] It is unnecessary, however, to here repeat the story of the struggle
over it. Presently Governor Edward Winslow of Plymouth was despatched
to England, as the joint agent of the two colonies, to look after their
endangered interests. He reached London in the autumn of 1634, bringing
with him an evasive reply to the demand contained in Cradock’s letter.
Winslow sailed in the middle or latter part of July, and a few days later, on
the 4th of August,[130] Jeffreys came over from Wessagusset to Boston,
bringing to Winthrop the letter which he had shortly before received from
Morton. It was the first intimation the magistrates had of the Commission
and of the appointment of a governor-general. Winthrop communicated the
news to Dudley and the other members of the Council, and to some of the
ministers; and, doubtless, for a time they all nursed an anxious hope that the
exaggerations in the letter were even greater than they really were. The
General Court met on the 25th of August. While it was still in session,
vessels arrived bringing tidings which dispelled all doubt, and confirmed
everything material that Morton had said. He whom the magistrates had so
ignominiously punished, and so contemptuously driven away, was evidently
in a position to know what those in authority intended. It began to be
evident that the Massachusetts magistrates had underestimated an opponent.
A full copy of the Order in Council establishing the board of Lords
Commissioners of Plantations, was now received, and the colonists were
further advised, through their private letters, that ships were being
furnished, and soldiers gotten ready for embarkation in them. It was given
out that these troops and vessels were intended for Virginia, whither a new
governor was about to be sent; but Winthrop wrote that in Massachusetts
the preparation was “suspected to be against us, to compel us by force to
receive a new governor, and the discipline of the church of England, and the
laws of the commissioners.[131]”
The answer which best expressed the spirit of the colony, in reply to Laud’s
threats, was now found, not in the missive which Winslow had in charge,
but in the act of Morton’s old oppressor, Endicott, when a few weeks later
at Salem he cut the red cross from the standard. It was an act, however,
which seemed to indicate that there was more truth than Winthrop was
disposed to admit in Gardiner and Morton’s charge that “the ministers and
people did continually rail against the state, church and bishops.”[132] Six

Page 57

months of great alarm and strenuous preparation now ensued. Steps were
taken to get together arms and ammunition, and defences were ordered at
Dorchester and Charlestown, as well as at Castle Island. The magistrates
were even empowered to impress laborers for the work. In January the
ministers were summoned to Bolton, and the question formally submitted to
them: “What ought we to do if a general governor should be sent out of
England?” The reply was that “we ought not to accept him, but defend our
lawful possessions if we are able.” In April a rumor of strange vessels
hovering off Cape Ann threw the whole province into a tumult. It was
supposed that Governor-general Gorges, with Morton in his train, was at the
harbor’s mouth. It proved to be a false alarm, and after that the excitement
seems gradually to have subsided.
This was in the spring of 1635. Meanwhile Winslow had reached England
sometime early in the previous autumn. Though he had not brought the
charter with him, its production does not seem to have been again
immediately called for. He probably held out confident assurances that it
would be sent over in the next vessel, as soon as the General Court met; but
it is also probable that, in view of the course which had now been decided
upon, an examination of it was no longer deemed necessary. The ensuing
spring, that of 1635, had been fixed upon by Gorges and Mason as the time
for decisive action. The charter was then to be vacated, and Gorges was to
go out to New England with a force sufficient to compel obedience. All this,
however, implied considerable preparation. Shipping had to be provided in
the first place. A large vessel was accordingly put upon the stocks. Rumor
said, also, that the new governor-general was to take out with him a force of
no less than one thousand soldiers.[133] Whether this was true or not, there
can be little doubt that all through the winter of 1634-5 active preparations
were on foot in England intended against the Massachusetts colony.
Besides watching these proceedings Winslow had other business in London
which required his appearance before the Lords Commissioners. He had
presented to them a petition on behalf of the two colonies for authority to
resist certain Dutch and French encroachments. This proceeding Winthrop
had not thought well advised,[134] as he very shrewdly argued that it implied
an absence of authority without such special authorization, and might thus
be drawn into a precedent. Winslow, however, had none the less submitted
the petition, and several hearings were given upon it. Fully advised as to

Page 58

everything that was going on before the Lords Commissioners, Gorges did
not favor this move. It authorized military or diplomatic action, the conduct
of which by right belonged to him as governor-general of the region within
which the action was to be taken. He accordingly went to work to
circumvent Winslow. What ensued throws a great deal of light on Morton’s
standing at the time, and the use that was made of him; and it also explains
the significance of certain things in the New Canaan.
Laud, it will be remembered, was the head and moving spirit of the Lords
Commissioners. His word was final in the Board. Upon him Gorges
depended to work all his results; which included not only his own
appointment as governor-general, with full power and authority as such, but
also the necessary supply of men and money to enable him to establish his
supremacy. To secure these ends it was necessary to play continually on the
Primate’s dislike of the Puritans, and his intense zeal in behalf of all Church
forms and ceremonies, including the use of the Book of Common Prayer.
The whole political and historical significance of the New Canaan lies in
this fact. It was a pamphlet designed to work a given effect in a particular
quarter, and came very near being productive of lasting results. Dedicated in
form to the Lords Commissioners, it was charged with attacks on the
Separatists, and statements of the contempt shown by them to the Book of
Common Prayer. Finally it contained one chapter on the church practices in
New England, which was clearly designed for the special enlightenment of
the Archbishop.[135] In this chapter it is set down as the first and
fundamental tenet of the New England church “that it is the magistrate’s
office absolutely, and not the minister’s, to join the people in lawful
matrimony;” next, that to make use of a ring in marriage is a relic of
popery; and then again “that the Book of Common Prayer is an idol; and all
that use it idolaters.” It now remains to show how cunningly, when it came
to questions of state, Laud was worked upon by these statements, and what
a puppet he became in the hands of Gorges and Morton.
Winslow’s suit had prospered. He had submitted to the Lords
Commissioners a plan for accomplishing the end desired without any
charge being imposed on the royal exchequer, and he was on the point of
receiving, as he supposed, a favorable decision. Suddenly the secret strings
were pulled. Bradford best tells the story of what ensued.

Page 59

“When Mr. Winslow should have had his suit granted, (as
indeed upon the point it was,) and should have been confirmed,
the Archbishop put a stop upon it, and Mr. Winslow, thinking to
get it freed, went to the Board again. But the Bishop, Sir
Ferdinando and Captain Mason had, as it seems, procured
Morton to complain. To whose complaints Mr. Winslow made
answer to the good satisfaction of the Board, who checked
Morton, and rebuked him sharply, and also blamed Sir
Ferdinando Gorges and Mason for countenancing him. But the
Bishop had a further end and use of his presence, for he now
began to question Mr. Winslow of many things, as of teaching in
the church publicly, of which Morton accused him and gave
evidence that he had seen and heard him do it; to which Mr.
Winslow answered that sometimes (wanting a minister) he did
exercise his gift to help the edification of his brethren, when
they wanted better means, which was not often. Then about
marriage, the which he also confessed, that, having been called
to place of magistracy, he had sometimes married some. And
further told their lordships that marriage was a civil thing, and
he found nowhere in the word of God that it was tied to
ministry. Again they were necessitated so to do, having for a
long time together at first no minister; besides, it was no new
thing, for he had been so married himself in Holland, by the
magistrates in their Stadt-House. But in the end, to be short, for
these things the Bishop, by vehement importunity, got the Board
at last to consent to his commitment. So he was committed to
the Fleet, and lay there seventeen weeks, or thereabout, before
he could get to be released. And this was the end of this petition
and this business; only the others’ design was also frustrated
hereby, with other things concurring, which was no small
blessing to people here.”[136]
For the time being, however, “the others’ design,” as Bradford describes
Gorges’s scheme, so far from being frustrated, moved on most
prosperously. All the friends and agents of the colony were now driven from
the field. Cradock, Saltonstall and Humfrey had departed the council-
chamber with “a pair of cold shoulders.” Winslow was a prisoner. Morton
had demonstrated that his boast in the letter to Jeffreys, that he would make

Page 60

his opponents “sing clamavi in the Fleet,” was not an idle one. He had not
exaggerated his power. Gorges’s course was now clear, and his plan
developed rapidly. At a meeting of those still members of the Council for
New England, held at Lord Gorges’s house on the 3d of February, 1635, the
next step was taken. The redivision of the seacoast was agreed upon. It was
now divided into eight parcels, instead of twenty as at the original abortive
division of 1623; and these parcels were assigned to eight several persons,
among whom were the Duke of Lenox, the Marquis of Hamilton, and the
Earls of Arundel, Carlisle and Sterling. Arundel alone of these was one of
the Lords Commissioners. Gorges received Maine as his portion; and
Mason got New Hampshire and Cape Ann. Massachusetts, south of Salem,
was assigned to Lord Gorges.
The division thus agreed on was to take effect simultaneously with the
formal surrender by the Council of its great patent. Ten weeks later, on the
18th of April, at another meeting at Lord Gorges’s house, a paper was read
and entered upon the records, in which the reasons for surrendering the
patent were set forth. At a subsequent meeting on the 26th a petition to the
King was approved, in which it was prayed that separate patents might be
issued securing to the associates in severalty the domains they had assigned
to each other. A declaration from the King was also then read, in which the
royal intention of appointing Sir Ferdinando Gorges governor-general of
New England was formally announced. Speaking by the mouth of the King,
the Primate did not propose “to suffer such numbers of people to run to
ruin, and to religious intents to languish, for want of timely remedy and
sovereign assistance.” Curiously enough, also, this typically Laudian
sentiment was enunciated at Whitehall the very day, the 26th of April, 1635,
upon which, on the other side of the Atlantic, the Marblehead fishermen had
brought in word of strange vessels hovering mysteriously upon the coast,
causing the Governor and assistants to hurry to Boston and an alarm to be
spread through all the towns.[137]
Before proceeding to eject the present occupants of the New England soil,
or to force them to some compromise as an alternative thereto, it remained
for the grantees of the now defunct Council to perfect their new titles.
Proceedings to this end were not delayed. The division had been agreed
upon on the 3d of February, and on the 26th of April the new patents had
been petitioned for. Ten days later Thomas Morton was “entertained to be

Page 61

solicitor for confirmation of the said deeds under the great seal, as also to
prosecute suit at law for the repealing of the patent belonging to the
Massachusetts Company. And is to have for fee twenty shillings a term, and
such further reward as those who are interested in the affairs of New
England shall think him fit to deserve, upon the judgment given in the
cause.” A month later, on the 7th of June, 1635, the formal surrender of its
patent by the Council took place.[138]
Morton, however, was not destined to land at Boston in the train of
Governor-general Gorges. The effort of 1634-5 was a mere repetition, on a
larger and more impressive scale, of the effort of 1623. The latter had
resulted in the abortive Robert Gorges expedition, and the former now set
all the courts at Westminster in solemn action. Neither of them, however,
came to anything. They both failed, also, from the same cause,—want of
money. The machinery in each case was imposing, and there was a great
deal of it. Seen from New England it must have appeared simply
overpowering. The King, the Primate, the Lords Commissioners, the
Attorney General, the Court of King’s Bench, the Great Seal, and a
governor-general representing the Duke of Lenox, the Marquis of Hamilton
and the Earls of Arundel, Carlisle and Sterling, royal proprietors, were all at
work together to bring about the destruction of an infant colony. When,
however, it came to accomplishing anything in a practical way, it grew
apparent by degrees that behind all this tremendous display of machinery
there was nothing but Sir Ferdinando Gorges,—an active-minded,
adventurous soldier, skilled in Court ways, persistent and full of resource,
but with small means of his own, and no faculty of obtaining means from
others. When it became therefore a question of real action, calling for the
sinews of war, the movement flopped dead in 1635, just as it had stopped in
1623. In 1635 it is true, Gorges had the assistance of Captain John Mason,
who was an energetic man with means at his command, and it was through
him that a ship was to be provided.[139] The building of this ship, however,
without doubt strained to the utmost the resources of all concerned; and
when, in launching, it suffered a mishap, again probably from insufficient
means, they could not make the damage good. The royal exchequer was
then as empty as Gorges’s own purse. The King was living on
benevolences, and on fines levied upon the great nobles for encroachments
on the royal forests. The writs to collect ship-money were issued in this

Page 62

very year. The next year public offices were sold. Under these
circumstances no assistance could for the present be looked for from
Charles or Laud. As for the noble associates, among whom the New
England coast had just been parcelled out, while perfectly willing to accept
great domains in America, they would venture nothing more to take actual
possession of them in 1635 than they had ventured in 1623. Nothing at all
was to be obtained from that quarter. Speaking of Gorges and Mason, and
the failure of their plans at this time, Winthrop wrote, “The Lord frustrated
their design.” This was the pious way of putting it. In point of fact,
however, the real safety of Massachusetts now depended on more homely
and every-day considerations. Gorges and Mason could not raise the money
absolutely necessary to carry their design out.
Nevertheless, though this delay was disappointing, there was no occasion
for despair. Things moved slowly; that was all. Gorges represented the New
England part of that royal system which was to stand or fall as a whole. In
the spring and summer of 1635 it looked very much as if it was destined to
stand. There was then no thought of a parliament at Court, or expectation of
one among the patriots. The crown lawyers were hunting up precedents
which would enable the King to levy taxes to suit himself. Wentworth had
brought Ireland into a state of perfect subjection. Laud was supreme in
England. The prospects for “Thorough” were never so good. If “Thorough”
prevailed in England it would in Massachusetts. There could be no doubt of
that. Meanwhile, though lack of ready means had put it out of Gorges’s
power to go to New England at once, there was no break or delay in legal
proceedings. In June, 1635, the attorney-general filed in the King’s Bench a
writ of quo warranto against the Massachusetts Bay Company. This was the
work which Thomas Morton had a month before been “entertained to
prosecute,” and the promptness of the attorney-general would seem to
indicate that on Morton’s part at least there was no failure in activity. The
plan was to set the charter aside, not because of any abuse of the powers
lawfully conferred in it, but on the ground that it was void ab initio. Every
title to land held under it would thus be vitiated. In answer to the summons
some of the original associates came in and pleaded, while others made
default. Cradock made default. In his case, therefore, judgment was given at
the Michaelmas, or September term, 1635, and the charter was declared
void, all the franchises conveyed in it being resumed by the King.[140] This
portion of the legal work in hand, therefore, that more particularly entrusted

Page 63

to Morton, seems to have been promptly and efficiently done. As respects
the patents for the domains granted under the last partition, things do not
seem to have moved so rapidly, for towards the close of November a
meeting of the associates of the now dissolved Council was held at the
house of Lord Sterling, and a vote passed that steps should be taken to get
patents to the individual patentees passed the seals as soon as possible.
Morton was in fact reminded of his duties.
A heavy blow was however impending over Gorges. He himself was now
an elderly man, verging close upon seventy years.[141] He could not have
been as active and as energetic as he once had been, and even his sanguine
disposition must have felt the usual depressing influence of hope long
deferred. Mason had of late been the mainstay of his enterprise. Only a year
before, that resolute man had sent out a large expedition, numbering some
seventy men, to Piscataqua, and he was contemplating extensive
explorations towards Lake Champlain. Morton eulogized him as a “very
good Commonwealth’s man, a true foster-father and lover of virtue,”[142]
and Winthrop referred to him as “the chief mover in all the attempts against
us.”[143] In December, 1635, Mason died,[144] and not improbably it was the
anticipation of his death which led to that meeting of the Council at which
the speedy issuing of the individual patents was urged. However this may
be, the loss of Mason seems to have been fatal to Gorges’s hopes; it was the
lopping off of the right arm of his undertakings. From that time forward
there was obviously no source from which he could hope to get the money
necessary to enable him to effect anything, except the royal treasury. Of
this, for two or three years yet, until the Scotch troubles destroyed the last
chance of the success of the ship-money scheme, there seemed a very good
prospect. Gorges, however, could not afford to wait. His remaining time
was short. Accordingly, after Mason’s death, little is heard of him or of the
Lords Commissioners.
During the next seven years, consequently, the traces of Morton are few.
There is a passing glimpse obtained of him in March, 1636, through a letter
from Cradock to Winthrop,[145] from which it appears he was then in
London and actively scheming against the Massachusetts Company. He
would seem at this time to have been in the pay of one George Cleaves, a
man of some importance and subsequently quite prominent in the early
history of Maine. Cleaves apparently had proposed some scheme to

Page 64

Cradock touching the Massachusetts Company, and Morton came to see
him about it. Thereupon Cradock says, “I having no desire to speak with
Morton alone put him off a turn or two on the exchange, till I found Mr.
Pierce,” etc. Further on in the same letter he speaks of his “greyffe and
disdayne” at the abuse heaped on the Company, and of the “heavey
burdens, there lode on me by T. M.;” and adds, “God forgive him that is the
cause of it.”
Early in 1637, and in consequence probably of the quo warranto
proceedings, a commission of some sort would appear to have been granted
to certain persons in New England for the government of that country.[146]
How or under what circumstances this was obtained is nowhere told. There
is a mystery about it. Gorges afterwards assured Winthrop that he knew
nothing of it,[147] and only a copy ever reached America, the original,
Winthrop says, being “staid at the seal for want of paying the fees.” He
further says that Cleaves procured this commission, as also a sort of patent,
or, as he calls it, “a protection under the privy signet for searching out the
great lake of Iracoyce.” From all this it would appear that the whole thing
was some impotent and inconsequential move on the part of Morton; for not
only does Winthrop say that the document was “staid at the seal,” but
Cradock wrote that the matter in reference to which Morton wanted to see
him, on behalf of Cleaves, related to paying the charge “in taking out
somewhat under the seale.” Gorges speaks of Morton as being at that time
Cleaves’s agent; and in the New Canaan, which either had just been
published or was then in the press, there is a glowing account of the “great
lake Erocoise,” and its boundless wealth of beaver,[148] to which apparently
the imaginative author had directed Cleaves’s attention sufficiently to
induce him to take out the “protection” which Winthrop alludes to.
The year 1637 was the turning-period in the fortunes of King Charles and of
Archbishop Laud, and consequently of Gorges and Morton. Up to that time
everything had gone sufficiently well, if not in Massachusetts, at least in
England, Ireland, and even Scotland. Now, however, the system began to
break down; giving way first, as would naturally enough be the case, at its
weakest point. This was in Scotland, where the attempt to force Episcopacy
on the people resulted in the famous “stony Sabbath” on the 23d of July.
The New Canaan was probably going through the press during the deceitful
period of profound calm which preceded that eventful day. Though now

Page 65

published, there is strong internal evidence that the book was written in
1634. Not only does this appear from the extract from its last page in the
letter to Jeffreys, already referred to,[149] but in another place[150] there is
reference to the expedition of Henry Josselyn for the more complete
discovery of Lake Champlain, which is mentioned as then in preparation.
Henry Josselyn left England about the time Morton was writing to Jeffreys,
or a little earlier, and reached Piscataqua in June, 1634.[151] Mason, on the
other hand, is mentioned as then living, and as having fitted out the
expedition of Josselyn. Mason, however, it has already been seen, died in
December, 1635. Written consequently after May, 1634, the New Canaan, it
would seem, received no revision later than 1635. It represented Morton’s
feelings during the time when he was most confident of an early and
triumphant return to New England. It was published just when the affairs of
Charles and Laud were at their full flood, and before the tide had begun to
ebb.
No mention is found of the New Canaan at the time of its publication. It is
not known, indeed, that a single copy was sent out to New England. Though
it must have caused no little comment and scandal among the friends and
correspondents of the colonists, there is no allusion to it in their published
letters or in the documents of the time, and in 1644 Winthrop apparently
had never seen it. Bradford energetically refers to it as “an infamouse and
scurillous booke against many godly and cheefe men of the cuntrie; full of
lyes and slanders, and fraight with profane callumnies against their names
and persons, and the ways of God.”[152] A copy of it may, therefore, have
been brought over to Plymouth by one of the agents of the colony, and there
passed from hand to hand. It does not appear, however, that at the time it
attracted any general or considerable notice in America; while in England,
of course, it would have interested only a small class of persons.
There is one significant reference which would seem to indicate that the
publication of the New Canaan was not agreeable to Gorges. However
much he might attack the charter of the Massachusetts Company, Sir
Ferdinando always showed himself anxious to keep on friendly terms with
the leading men of the colony. In the Briefe Narration he takes pains to
speak of “the patience and wisdom of Mr. Winthrop, Mr. Humphreys, Mr.
Dudley, and others their assistants;”[153] and with Winthrop he was in
correspondence, even authorizing him and others to act for him in Maine.

Page 66

He deceived no one by this, for Winthrop afterwards described him as
“pretending by his letters and speeches to seek our welfare;”[154] but he
evidently had always in mind that he was to go out some day to New
England as a governor-general, and that it would not do for him to be too
openly hostile to those over whom he proposed to rule. He regarded them as
his people. When, therefore, he had occasion to write to Winthrop in
August, 1637, though he made no reference to the New Canaan, which had
probably been published early in the year, he took pains to say that Morton
was “wholely casheered from intermedlinge with anie our affaires
hereafter.”[155]
It is however open to question whether, in making this statement, Gorges
was not practising a little of that king-craft for which his master, James I.,
had been so famous. In 1637 Morton may have been in disgrace with him;
but if so it was a passing disgrace. Four years later, in 1641, Sir Ferdinando,
as “Lord of the Province of Maine,” indulged his passion for feudal
regulation by granting a municipal charter to the town of Acomenticus, now
York. A formidable document of great import, this momentous state paper
was signed and delivered by the Lord Paramount, much as an English
sovereign might have granted a franchise to his faithful city of London; and
accordingly it was countersigned by three witnesses, one of them a member
of his own family. First of the three witnesses to sign was Thomas Morton.
[156]
He evidently was in no disgrace then.
With the exception of this signature to the Acomenticus charter, there is no
trace to be found of Morton between August 1637, when Gorges wrote that
he had “casheered” him, and the summer of 1643, when he reappeared once
more at Plymouth. During the whole of that time things evidently went with
him, as they did with Charles and Laud, from bad to worse. Once only had
the Lords Commissioners given any signs of life. This was in the spring of
1638, when on the 4th of April the Board met at Whitehall. The record of
the meeting states that petitions and complaints from Massachusetts, for
want of a settled and orderly government, were growing more frequent.
This is very possible, for the Antinomian Controversy was then at its height,
and indeed, the very day the Lords Commissioners met, Mrs. Hutchinson,
having left Boston in obedience to Governor Winthrop’s mandate a week
before, was on her way to join her husband and friends in Rhode Island.
Under these circumstances, calling to mind the futile order for the return of

Page 67

the charter, sent to Winthrop in 1634 through Cradock, and taking official
notice of the result of the quo warranto proceedings, the Board resolved
upon a more decided tone. The clerk in attendance was instructed to send
out to Massachusetts a peremptory demand for the immediate surrender of
the charter. It was to be sent back to London by the return voyage of the
vessel which carried out the missive of the Board; “it being resolved,” so
that missive ran, “that in case of any further neglect or contempt by them
shewed therein, their Lordships will cause a strict course to be taken against
them, and will move his Majesty to reassume into his own hands the whole
plantation.”[157]
If, as was probably the case, Morton was the secret mover of this action, it
proved to be his last effort. It was completely fruitless also. When the order
reached Boston, sometime in the early summer of 1638, it naturally caused
no little alarm, for the apprehension of a general governor had not yet
disappeared. Indeed, on the 12th of April, “a general fast [had been] kept
through all the churches, by advice from the Court, for seeking the Lord to
prevent evil that we feared to be intended against us from England by a
general governor.”[158] With the missive of the Lords Commissioners,
however, came also tidings of “the troubles which arose in Scotland about
the Book of Common Prayer and the canons which the King would have
forced upon the Scotch churches.”[159] The result was that in August,
instead of sending out the charter, Governor Winthrop, at the direction of
the General Court, wrote “to excuse our not sending of it; for it was
resolved to be best not to send it.”[160]
Archbishop Laud molested the colony no further. Doubtless Morton yet
endeavored more than once to stir him up to action, and the next year he
received from New England other and bitter complaints of the same
character as those which had come to him before. This time it was the Rev.
George Burdet—a disreputable clergyman, subsequently a thorn in Gorges’s
side as now in that of Winthrop—who wrote to him. The harassed and
anxious Primate could, however, only reply that “by reason of the much
business now lay upon them, [the Lords Commissioners] could not at
present ... redress such disorders as he had informed them of.”[161] Events in
England and Scotland were then moving on rapidly as well as steadily to
their outcome, and Massachusetts was bidden to take care of itself.

Page 68

Nothing more is heard of Morton until the summer of 1643. The Civil War
was then dragging along in its earlier stages, before Fairfax and Cromwell
put their hands to it. It was the summer during which Prince Rupert took
Bristol and the first battle of Newbury was fought,—the summer made
memorable by the deaths of Hampden and Falkland. Gorges had identified
himself with the Royalist side, and now Morton seems to have been fairly
starved out of England. When or how he came to Plymouth we do not
know; but, on the 11th of September, Edward Winslow, whom he had eight
years before “clapte up in the Fleete,”[162] thus wrote to Winthrop:—

Page 69

“Concerning Morton, our Governor gave way that he should
winter here, but begone as soon as winter breaks up. Captain
Standish takes great offence thereat, especially that he is so near
him as Duxbury, and goeth sometimes a fowling in his ground.
He cannot procure the least respect amongst our people, liveth
meanly at four shillings per week, and content to drink water, so
he may diet at that price. But admit he hath a protection, yet it
were worth the while to deal with him till we see it. The truth is
I much question his pretended employment; for he hath here
only showed the frame of a Common-weale and some old sealed
commissions, but no inside known. As for Mr. Rigby if he be so
honest, good and hopefull an instrument as report passeth on
him, he hath good hap to light on two of the arrantest known
knaves that ever trod on New English shore to be his agents east
and west, as Cleaves and Morton: but I shall be jealous on him
till I know him better, and hope others will take heed how they
trust him who investeth such with power who have devoted
themselves to the ruin of the country, as Morton hath. And for
my part, (who if my heart deceive me not can pass by all the evil
instrumentally he brought on me,) would not have this serpent
stay amongst us, who out of doubt in time will get strength to
him if he be suffered, who promiseth large portions of land
about New Haven, Narragansett, &c., to all that will go with
him, but hath a promise but of one person who is old, weak and
decrepid, a very atheist and fit companion for him. But, indeed,
Morton is the odium of our people at present, and if he be
suffered, (for we are diversely minded,) it will be just with God,
who hath put him in our hands and we will foster such an one,
that afterward we shall suffer for it.”[163]
The Rigby referred to in this letter was Mr. Alexander Rigby, an English
gentleman of wealth who, besides being a strong Puritan, was a member of
the Long Parliament, and at one time held a commission as colonel in the
army. Cleaves was the George Cleaves already mentioned as having come
out in 1637, with a protection under the privy signet.[164] He had then
appeared as an agent of Gorges, but subsequently he had got possession in
Maine of the “Plough patent,” so called, under which the title to a large part

Page 70

of the province was claimed adversely to Gorges.[165] This patent Cleaves
induced Rigby to buy, and the latter was now endeavoring to get his title
recognized, and ultimately succeeded in so doing. Cleaves, as well as
Morton, enjoyed the reputation of being “a firebrand of dissension,”[166]
and the two had long acted together. As Gorges had joined his fortunes to
the Royalist side, Morton clearly had nothing to gain by pretending at
Plymouth to be his agent or under his protection. So he seems to have tried
to pass himself off as a Commonwealth’s man, commissioned by Rigby to
act in his behalf. Winslow was probably quite right in suspecting that this
was all a pretence. Rigby’s claim was for territory in Maine. It is not known
that he ever had any interests in Rhode Island or Connecticut. There can, in
short, be little doubt that Morton was now nothing more than a poor,
broken-down, disreputable, old impostor, with some empty envelopes and
manufactured credentials in his pocket.
At Plymouth, as would naturally be supposed, Morton made no headway.
But the province of Maine was then in an uneasy, troubled condition, and
there was reported to be a strong party for the king in the neighborhood of
Casco Bay. Thither accordingly Morton seems to have gone in June, 1644.
[167]
His movements were closely watched, and Endicott was notified that
he would go by sea to Gloucester, hoping to get a passage from thence to
the eastward. A warrant for his arrest was at once despatched, but
apparently he eluded it; nor if he went there, which, indeed, is doubtful, did
Morton long remain in Maine. In August he was in Rhode Island, and on
the 5th of that month he is thus alluded to in a letter from Coddington to
Winthrop:—
“For Morton he was [insinuating] who was for the King at his
first coming to Portsmouth, and would report to such as he
judged to be of his mind he was glad [to meet with] so many
cavaliers; ... and he had lands to dispose of to his followers in
each Province, and from Cape Ann to Cape Cod was one.... And
that he had wrong in the Bay [to the] value of two hundred
pounds, and made bitter complaints thereof. But Morton would
let it rest till the Governor came over to right him; and did
intimate he knew whose roast his spits and jacks turned.”[168]

Page 71

Prospering in Rhode Island no more than at Plymouth, Morton is next heard
of as a prisoner in Boston. How he came within the clutches of the
Massachusetts magistrates is not known; his necessities or his assurance
may have carried him to Boston, or he may have been pounced upon by
Endicott’s officers as he was furtively passing through the province. In
whatever way it came about, he was in custody on the 9th of September,
just five weeks from the time of Coddington’s letter to Winthrop, and the
latter then made the following entry in his Journal:[169]—
“At the court of assistants Thomas Morton was called forth
presently after the lecture, that the country might be satisfied of
the justice of our proceeding against him. There was laid to his
charge his complaint against us at the council board, which he
denied. Then we produced the copy of the bill exhibited by Sir
Christopher Gardiner, etc., wherein we were charged with
treason, rebellion, etc., wherein he was named as a party or
witness. He denied that he had any hand in the information, only
was called as a witness. To convince him to be the principal
party, it was showed: 1. That Gardiner had no occasion to
complain against us, for he was kindly used and dismissed in
peace, professing much engagement for the great courtesy he
found here. 2. Morton had set forth a book against us, and had
threatened us, and had prosecuted a quo warranto against us,
which he did not deny. 3. His letter was produced,[170] written
soon after to Mr. Jeffreys, his old acquaintance and intimate
friend.”
This passage is characteristic both of the man and of the time. The prisoner
now arraigned before the magistrates had been set in the stocks, all his
property had been confiscated, and his house had been burned down before
his eyes. He had been sent back to England, under a warrant, to stand his
trial for crimes it was alleged he had committed. In England he had been
released from imprisonment in due course of law. Having now returned to
Massachusetts, he was brought before the magistrates, “that the country
might be satisfied of the justice of our proceeding against him.” As the
result of this proceeding, which broke down for want of proof, the alleged
offender is again imprisoned, heavily fined, and narrowly escapes a
whipping. Under all these circumstances, it becomes interesting to inquire

Page 72

what the exact offence alleged against him was. It was stated by Winthrop.
He had made a “complaint against us at the council board.”
“The council board” thus referred to was the royal Privy Council. It
represented the king, the supreme power in the state, the source from
whence the charter of the Massachusetts Bay Company was derived. The
complaint, therefore, charged to have been made, was made to the common
superior, and it alleged the abuse, by an inferior, of certain powers and
privileges which that superior had granted. It would seem to have been no
easy task for the magistrates to point out, either to the prisoner or to the
country it was proposed to satisfy, any prescriptive law, much less any penal
statute, which made a criminal offence out of a petition to the
acknowledged supreme power in the state, even though that petition set
forth the alleged abuse of charter privileges.
But it is not probable that this view of the matter ever even suggested itself
to Winthrop and his associates. It does not seem even to have been urged
upon them by the prisoner. On the contrary he appears to have accepted the
inevitable, and practically admitted that a complaint to the king was in
Massachusetts, as Burdet had some years before asserted, “accounted a
perjury and treason in our general courts,”[171] punishable at the discretion
of the magistrates. Morton, therefore, denied having made the complaint,
and the magistrates were unable to prove it against him. The most singular
and unaccountable feature in the proceedings is that the New Canaan was
not put in evidence. Apparently there was no copy of it to be had. Could one
have been produced, it is scarcely possible that the avowed author of the
libellous strictures on Endicott, then himself governor, should have escaped
condign punishment of some sort from a bench of Puritan magistrates. But
Winthrop merely mentions that he had “set forth a book against us,” and
Maverick says that this was denied and could not be proved.[172] Had a
copy of the New Canaan then been at hand, either in Boston or at
Plymouth, a glance at the titlepage would have proved who “set [it] forth”
beyond possibility of denial.
The only entry in the Massachusetts records relating to this proceeding is as
follows:—
“For answer to Thomas Morton petition, the magistrates have
called him publicly, and have laid divers things to his charge,

Page 73

which he denies; and therefore they think fit that further
evidence be sent for into England, and that Mr Downing may
have instructions to search out evidence against him, and he to
lie in prison in the mean time, unless he find sufficient bail.”[173]
This entry is from the records of the General Court, held in November
1644. Among the unpublished documents in the Massachusetts archives is
yet another petition from Morton, bearing no date, but, from the
endorsement upon it, evidently submitted to the General Court of May,
1645, six months later, when Dudley was governor. This petition is as
follows:—
To the honored Court at Boston assembled:
The humble petition of Thomas Morton, prisoner.
Your petitioner craveth the favour of this honored Court to cast
back your eies and behould what your poore petitioner hath
suffered in these parts.
First, the petitioner’s house was burnt, and his goodes taken
away.
Secondly, his body clapt into Irons, and sent home in a desperat
ship, unvittled, as if he had been a man worthy of death, which
appeared contrary when he came there.
Now the petitioner craves this further that you would be pleased
to consider what is laid against him: (taking it for granted to be
true) which is not proved: whether such a poore worme as I had
not some cause to crawle out of this condition above mentioned.
Thirdly, the petitioner craves this favoure of you, as to view his
actions lately towards New England, whether they have not been
serviceable to some gentlemen in the country; but I will not
praise my selfe.
Fourthly, the petitioner coming into these parts, which he loveth,
on godly gentlemen’s imployments, and your worshipps having
a former jelosy of him, and a late untrue intelligence of him,
your petitioner has been imprisoned manie Moneths and laid in
Irons to the decaying of his Limbs; Let your petitioner finde soe

Page 74

much favoure, as to see that you can passe by former offence,
which finding the petitioner hopes he shall stand on his watch to
doe you service as God shall enable him.
Upon this document, certainly humble enough in tone, appear the following
endorsements:—
The house of Deputies desire the honored magistrates to return
them a reason, wherefore the petitioner came not to his triall the
last quarter Courte according to graunte (as they conceave) of a
former petition presented to the Courte by him.
ROBT. BRIDGES.
The reason why he came not to his tryall was the not cominge of
evidence out of England against him which we expect by the
next ship.
THO: DUDLEY Govr
The house of Deputies have made choyce of Major Gibbons,
and Captain Jennison to treate with the honored magistrates
about this petition of Morton.
ROBT. BRIDGES.
Singularly enough the Major Gibbons to whom Morton’s petition was thus
referred had, in former years, been one of his followers at Merry-Mount. He
was a man of ability and energy, the whole of whose singular career, as
traced in an interesting note of Palfrey’s, will not bear a too close scrutiny.
[174]
At the time of Morton’s arrest by Miles Standish, in 1629, Gibbons was
probably one of those belonging to the Merry-Mount company who had
then “gone up into the inlands to trade with the savages.”[175] During that
summer he experienced religion in a quite unexpected way, and now, in
1645, while his old master was rotting in the Boston jail, Gibbons was a
prosperous merchant, a deputy to the General Court, and “chief military
officer of the train-band of the town.” Higher military honors and severe
business vicissitudes were in store for him. It nowhere appears whether
under these circumstances Major Gibbons had either the will or the ability
to be of service to his former chief, and Winthrop is the only authority for
what remains of Morton’s story. It is soon told.

Page 75

“Having been kept in prison about a year in expectation of
further evidence out of England, he was again called before the
court, and after some debate what to do with him, he was fined
100 pounds, and set at liberty. He was a charge to the country,
for he had nothing, and we thought not fit to inflict corporal
punishment upon him, being old and crazy, but thought better to
fine him and give him his liberty, as if it had been to procure his
fine, but indeed to leave him opportunity to go out of the
jurisdiction, as he did soon after, and he went to Acomenticus,
and living there poor and despised, he died within two years
after.”[176]
Morton himself asserted that the harsh treatment he underwent in prison,
while waiting for that evidence from England which was to convict him of
some crime, broke down his health and hastened his end. If he was indeed,
as Maverick subsequently stated,[177] kept in jail and, as he himself says, in
irons, through an entire New England winter, on the prison fare of those
days, and without either fire or bedding, this seems wholly probable.

There was about Thomas Morton nothing that was remarkable. On the
contrary he was one of a class of men common enough in the days of
Elizabeth and the Stuarts to have found their way into the literature of the
period, as well as into that more modern romance which undertakes to deal
with it. It is the Alsatian Squire and Wildrake type. Morton chanced to get
out of place. He was a vulgar Royalist libertine, thrown by accident into the
midst of a Puritan community. He was unable or unwilling to accept the
situation, or to take himself off; and hence followed his misfortunes and his
notoriety. Had he in 1625, or even in 1629, gone to Virginia or to New
York, he would have lived in quiet and probably died in poverty, leaving
nothing behind to indicate that he had ever been. As it is, he will receive a
mention in every history of America.
More recently also certain investigators, who have approached the subject
from a Church of England point of view, have shown some disposition to
adopt Morton’s cause as their own, and to attribute his persecution, not to

Page 76

his immoral life or illicit trade, but to his devotion to the Book of Common
Prayer.[178] It is another article in the long impeachment of the founders of
New England, and it has even been alleged that “it still remains for
Massachusetts to do justice to Morton, who had his faults, though he was
not the man his enemies, and notably Bradford, declared him to be.”[179]
The New English Canaan is the best and only conclusive evidence on this
point. In its pages Morton very clearly shows what he was, and the nature
of “his faults.” He was a born Bohemian, and as he passed on in life he
became an extremely reckless but highly amusing old debauchee and
tippler. When he was writing his book, Archbishop Laud was the head of
the board of Lords Commissioners. On the action of that board depended all
the author’s hopes. In view of this fact, there are, in the New Canaan, few
more delightful or characteristic passages than that in which, describing his
arrest by Standish, Morton announces that it was “because mine host was a
man that endeavored to advance the dignity of the Church of England;
which they, on the contrary part, would labor to vilify with uncivil terms;
envying against the sacred Book of Common Prayer, and mine host that
used it in a laudable manner amongst his family as a practice of piety.”[180]
The part he was endeavoring to play when he wrote this passage was one
not very congenial to him, and he makes an awkward piece of work of it.
The sudden tone of sanctimony which he infuses into the words quoted,
hardly covers up the leer and gusto with which he had just been describing
the drunkenness and debauchery of Merry-Mount,—how “the good liquor”
had flowed to all comers, while “the lasses in beaver-coats” had been
welcome “night and day;” how “he that played Proteus, with the help of
Priapus, put their noses out of joint;” and how that “barren doe” became
fruitful, who is mysteriously alluded to as a “goodly creature of
incontinency” who had “tried a camp royal in other parts.” Though, from
the point of view before alluded to, it has been asserted that the
Massachusetts magistrates “invented ... insinuations respecting [Morton’s]
treatment of [the Indian] women, whom, in reality, he had fought to instruct
in the principles of religion,”[181]—though this and other similar assertions
have been made with apparent gravity, yet it is impossible to read the third
book of the New Canaan, saturated as it is with drunkenness, ribaldry and
scoffing, without coming to the conclusion that Don Quixote, Rabelais and

Page 77

the Decameron are far more likely to have been in request at Merry-Mount
than the Bible or the Book of Common Prayer.
Not that the New Canaan is in itself an obscene or even a coarse book. On
the contrary, judged by the standard of its time, it is singularly the reverse.
Indeed it is almost wholly free from either word or allusion which would
offend the taste of the present day. Yet the writer of the New Canaan was
none the less a scoffer, a man of undevout mind. As to the allegation that his
devotion to the Church of England and its ritual was the cause of his arrest
by the Plymouth authorities, the answer is obvious and decisive. Blackstone
was an Episcopalian, and a devout one, retaining even in his wilderness
home the canonical coat which told of his calling.[182] Maverick and
Walford were Episcopalians; they lived and died such. The settlers at
Wessagusset were Episcopalians. In the dwellings of all these the religious
services of the times, customary among Episcopalians, were doubtless
observed, for they were all religious men. Yet not one of them was ever in
any way molested by the Plymouth people; but, on the contrary, they one
and all received aid and encouragement from Plymouth. Episcopalians as
they were, they all joined in dealing with Morton as a common enemy and a
public danger; and such he unquestionably was. It was not, then, because he
made use of the Common Prayer that he was first driven from the
Massachusetts Bay; it was because he was a nuisance and a source of
danger. That subsequently, and by the Massachusetts authorities, he was
dealt with in a way at once high-handed and oppressive, has been
sufficiently shown in these pages. Yet it is by no means clear that, under
similar circumstances, he would not have been far more severely and
summarily dealt with at a later period, when the dangers of a frontier life
had brought into use an unwritten code, which evinced even a less regard
for life than, in Morton’s case, the Puritans evinced for property.[183]
As a literary performance the New Canaan, it is unnecessary to say, has
survived through no merits of its own. While it is, on the whole, a better
written book than the Wonder-Working Providence, it is not so well written
as Wood’s Prospect; and it cannot compare with what we have from the
pens of Smith or Gorges,—much less from those of Winslow, Winthrop
and, above all, Bradford. Indeed, it is amazing how a man who knew as
much as Morton knew of events and places now full of interest, could have
sat down to write about them at all, and then, after writing so much, have

Page 78

told so little. Rarely stating anything quite correctly,—the most careless and
slipshod of authors,—he took a positive pleasure in concealing what he
meant to say under a cloud of metaphor. Accordingly, when printed, the
New Canaan fell still-born from the press, the only contemporaneous trace
of it which can be found in English literature being Butler’s often quoted
passage in Hudibras, in which the Wessagusset hanging is alluded to.[184] It
is even open to question whether this reference was due to Butler’s having
read the book. The passage referred to is in the second part of Hudibras,
which was not published until 1664, twenty-seven years after the
publication of the New Canaan. It is perfectly possible that Butler may have
known Morton; for in 1637 the future author of Hudibras was already
twenty-five years old, and Morton lingered about London for six or seven
years after that. There are indications that he knew Ben Jonson;[185] and,
indeed, it is scarcely possible that with his sense of humor and convivial
tastes Morton should not often have met the poets and playwrights of the
day at the Mermaid. If he and the author of Hudibras ever did chance to
meet, they must have proved congenial spirits, for there is much that is
Hudibrastic in the New Canaan. Not impossibly, therefore, the idea of a
vicarious New England hanging dwelt for years in the brain of Butler, not
as the reminiscence of a passage he had read in some forgotten book, but as
a vague recollection of an amusing story which he had once heard Morton
tell.
It is, indeed, the author’s sense of humor, just alluded to, which gives to the
New Canaan its only real distinction among the early works relating to New
England. In this respect it stands by itself. In all the rest of those works, one
often meets with passages of simplicity, of pathos and of great descriptive
power,—never with anything which was both meant to raise a smile, and
does it. The writers seemed to have no sense of humor, no perception of the
ludicrous. Bradford, for instance, as a passage “rather of mirth than of
weight,” describes how he put a stop to the Christmas games at Plymouth in
1621. There is a grim solemnity in his very chuckle. Winthrop gives a long
account of the penance of Captain John Underhill, as he stood upon a stool
in the church, “without a band, in a foul linen cap pulled close to his eyes,”
and “blubbering,” confessed his adultery with the cooper’s wife.[186] Yet he
evidently recorded it with unbroken gravity. Then, in 1644, he mentions that
“two of our ministers’ sons, being students in the college, robbed two

Page 79

dwelling-houses, in the night, of some 15 pounds. Being found out, they
were ordered by the governors of the college to be there whipped, which
was performed by the president himself—yet they were about twenty years
of age.”[187] If Morton had recorded this incident, he could not have helped
seeing a ludicrous side to it, and he would have expressed it in some
humorous, or at least in some grotesque way. Winthrop saw the serious side
of everything, and the serious side only. In this he was like all the rest. Such
solemnity, such everlasting consciousness of responsibility to God and man,
is grand and perhaps impressive; but it grows wearisome. It is pleasant to
have it broken at last, even though that which breaks it is in some respects
not to be commended. A touch of ribaldry becomes bearable. Among what
are called Americana, therefore, the New Canaan is and will always remain
a refreshing book. It is a connecting link. Poor as it may be, it is yet all we
have to remind us that in literature, also, Bradford and Winthrop and Cotton
were Englishmen of the time of Shakespeare and Jonson and Butler.

Page 80

It remains only to speak of the bibliography of the New Canaan, which at
one time excited some discussion, and of the present edition. Written before
the close of 1635, the New Canaan was printed at Amsterdam in 1637. It
has been reprinted but once,—by Force, in the second volume of his
American Tracts. The present is, therefore, the second reprint, and the first
annotated edition. For a number of years it was supposed that copies of the
book were in existence with an alternative titlepage, bearing the imprint of
Charles Greene, and the date of 1632.[188] This supposition was, however,
very carefully examined into by Mr. Winsor in the Harvard University
Literary Bulletins (Nos. 9 and 10, 1878-9, pp. 196, 244), and found to be
partially, at least, groundless. It was due to the fact that Force made his
reprint from a copy of the book in his collection, now in the Library of
Congress. That copy lacked a portion or the whole of the titlepage; and the
missing parts seem to have been supplied, without mention of the fact being
made, from the entry of the book under 1632 in White Kennet’s Bibliothecæ
Americanæ Primordia. Apparently the error originated in the following
way. The New Canaan was entered for copyright in the Stationers’
Registers in London, November 18, 1633, in behalf of Charles Greene, the
printer. There is no reason to suppose that it was then completed, as it may
have been entered by its title alone. If it was, however, completed in part in
1633, the internal evidence is conclusive that it was both revised[189] and
added to[190] as late as 1634; and, indeed, the Board of Lords
Commissioners for regulating Plantations, to which it is formally dedicated,
was not created until April 10th of that year. Greene did not print the book;
though, as will presently be seen, a certain number of copies may possibly
have been struck off for him with titlepages of their own. The entry in the
Stationers’ Registers was, however, afterwards discovered, and seems then
to have supplied by inference the date of publication, which could not be
learned from certain copies, the titlepages to which were defective or

Page 81

wanting. The dates given in Lowndes’s Manual would seem to be simply
incorrect.[191] Meanwhile, for reasons probably of economy, though notice
of publication had been given in London, the book was actually printed in
Holland, and the regular titlepage reads: “Printed at Amsterdam by Jacob
Frederick Stam, in the year 1637.” There are copies, however, the titlepages
of which read: “Printed for Charles Greene, and are sold in Pauls
Churchyard,” no date being given.[192] It is not known that these copies
differ in any other respect from those bearing the usual imprint. The
conclusion, therefore, would seem to be that, as already stated, a number of
copies may have been struck off for Greene with a distinct titlepage.
Properly speaking, however, there seems to have been but one edition of the
book. With the exception of the Force titlepage, which has been shown to
be erroneous, there is no evidence of any copy being in existence bearing an
earlier date than the usual one of Amsterdam, 1637.
Copies of the New Canaan are extremely rare. Savage, in his notes to
Winthrop (vol. i. p. *34), said that he had then, before 1825, never heard of
but one copy, “which was owned by his Excellency John Q. Adams.” It is
from that copy that the present edition is printed. Mr. Adams purchased it
while in Europe prior to the year 1801. It was that copy also which was
temporarily deposited in the Boston Athenæum in 1810, as mentioned in the
Monthly Anthology of that date (vol. viii. p. 420), referred to in the Harvard
University Library Bulletin, (No. 9, p. 196). The Rev. George Whitney, in
his History of Quincy written in 1826, says (p. 11) that another “copy was
lately presented to the Adams Library of the town of Quincy by the Rev.
Thaddeus Mason Harris.”[193] In addition to these, some dozen or twenty
other copies in all are known to exist in various public and private
collections in America and Europe, several of which are enumerated in the
Literary Bulletin just referred to.
Very many of the errors both in typography and punctuation, with which the
New Canaan abounds, are obviously due to the fact that it was printed in
Amsterdam. The original manuscript it would seem was no more legible
than the manuscript of that period, as it has come down to us, is usually
found to be. At best it was not easy to decipher. The copy of the New
Canaan was then put in the hands of a compositor imperfectly, if at all,
acquainted with English; and, if the proof-sheets were ever corrected by any
one, they certainly were not corrected by the author or by a proof-reader

Page 82

really familiar with his writing, or even with the tongue in which he wrote.
Accordingly pen flourishes were mistaken for punctuation marks, and these
were inserted without any regard to the context; familiar words appeared in
unintelligible shapes;[194] small letters were mistaken for capitals, and
capitals for small letters, and one letter was confounded with another. In
addition to these numerous mistakes in deciphering and following the
manuscript, ordinary typographical errors are not uncommon; though in this
respect the New Canaan is less marked by blemishes than under the
circumstances would naturally be supposed.
Neither is this explanation of the curiously bad press-work of the New
Canaan a mere conjecture. One other composition of Morton’s has come
down to us in the letter to Jeffreys, preserved by Winthrop.[195] Let any one
compare this letter with a chapter from the New Canaan, and he will see at
once that, while both are manifestly productions from the same pen, they
have been preserved under wholly different circumstances. Take, for
instance, the following identical passages,—the one from the New Canaan
and the other from the letter to Jeffreys, and they will sufficiently illustrate
this point.

Page 83

NEW CANAAN. LETTER TO JEFFREYS.
Book iii. Chapter 31. Savage’s Winthrop, vol.
II. p. *190.
And now mine Host being
merrily disposed, haveing So that now Jonas being
past many perillous set ashore may safely cry,
adventures in that repent you cruel
desperat Whales belly, separatists, repent, there
beganne in a posture like are as yet but forty days.
Ionas, and cryed Repent If Jove vouchsafe to
you cruell Seperatists thunder, the charter and
repent, there are as yet but kingdom of the separatists
40. dayes if Iove will fall asunder. Repent
vouchsafe to thunder, you cruel schismatics,
Charter and the Kingdome repent.
of the Seperatists will fall
a sunder: Repent you
cruell Schismaticks
repent.

The letter to Jeffreys is curiously characteristic of Morton. It is written in
the same inflated, metaphorical, enigmatic style as the New Canaan. It is,
however, perfectly intelligible and even energetic. The reason is obvious. It
was correctly copied by a man who understood what the writer was saying.
Accordingly it is as clear as Winthrop’s own text. The New Canaan would
have been equally clear had it been deciphered at the compositor’s form by
a man with Winthrop’s familiarity with English.

There is some reason to think that the fancy for exact reproduction in
typography has of late years been carried to an extreme. Not only have
peculiarities of spelling, capitalization and type, which were really

Page 84

characteristic of the past, been carefully followed, but abbreviations and
figures have been reproduced in type, which formerly were confined to
manuscripts, and are certainly never found in the better printed books of the
same period. It is certainly desirable in reprinting quaint works, which it is
not supposed will ever pass into the hands of general readers, to have them
appear in the dress of the time to which they belong. Indeed they cannot be
modernized in spelling, the use of capitals, or even, altogether, in
punctuation, without losing something of their flavor. Yet, this
notwithstanding, there is no good reason why gross and manifest blunders,
due to the ignorance of compositors and the carelessness of proof-readers,
should be jealously perpetuated as if they were sacred things. This assuredly
is carrying the spirit of faithful reproduction to fanaticism. It is Chinese.
The rule followed, therefore, in the present edition has been to reproduce
the New Canaan as it appeared in the Amsterdam edition of 1637,
correcting only the punctuation, and such errors of the press as are manifest
and unmistakable. Very few changes have been made in the use of capitals,
and those only where it is obvious that a letter of one kind in the copy was
mistaken by the compositor for a letter of another kind. An example of this
is found at the top of page *14, where “Captaine Davis’ fate,” in the
author’s manuscript, is made to appear as “Captain Davis Fate,” in the
original text. The compositor evidently mistook the small f, written with the
old-fashioned flourish, for an initial capital. The spelling has in no case
been changed except where the error, as in the case already cited of “muit”
for “mint,” is manifestly due to printers’ blunders. Mistakes of the press,
such as “legg” for “logg” (p. *77) and “vies” for “eies” (p. *152), have been
made right wherever they could be certainly detected.
No conjectural readings whatever have been inserted in the text. The few
passages, not more than four or five in number, in which, owing probably to
the failure of the compositor to decipher manuscript, the meaning of the
original is not clear, are reproduced exactly. No liberties whatever have
been taken with the original edition in these cases, and all guesses which
are indulged in as to the author’s meaning, whether by the editor or others,
are confined to the notes. In a few places the text is obviously deficient.
Words necessary to the meaning are omitted in printing. Wherever these
have been conjecturally inserted, the inserted words are in brackets. In a
very few cases, words, which could clearly have found their way into the

Page 85

original only through inadvertence, have been omitted. Attention is called in
the notes to every such omission.
The effort in the present edition has, in short, been to make it a reproduction
of the New Canaan; but the reproduction was to be an intelligent, and not a
servile one.

Page 86

NEW ENGLISH CANAAN
OR
NEW CANAAN.
Containing an Abstract of New England,
Composed in three Bookes.

The first Booke setting forth the originall of the Natives, their Manners and
Customes, together with their tractable Nature and Love towards the
English.

The second Booke setting forth the naturall Indowments of the Country, and
what staple Commodities it yealdeth.

The third Booke setting forth, what people are planted there, their
prosperity, what remarkable accidents have happened since the first planting
of it, together with their Tenents and practise of their Church.

Written by Thomas Morton of Cliffords Inne gent, upon tenne yeares
knowledge and experiment of the Country.

Page 87

Printed at AMSTERDAM,
By JACOB FREDERICK STAM.
In the Yeare 1637.

Page 88

To the right honorable, the Lords and others of his Majesties most
honorable privy Councell, Commissioners, for the Government of all his
Majesties forraigne Provinces.[196]
Right honorable,
HE zeale which I beare to the advauncement of the glory
of God, the honor of his Majesty, and the good of the
weale publike hath incouraged mee to compose this
abstract, being the modell of a Rich, hopefull and very
beautifull Country worthy the Title of Natures
Masterpeece, and may be lost by too much sufferance.
It is but a widowes mite, yet {4} all that wrong and
rapine hath left mee to bring from thence, where I have indevoured my best,
bound by my allegeance, to doe his Majesty service. This in all humility I
present as an offering, wherewith I prostrate my selfe at your honorable
footstoole. If you please to vouchsafe it may receave a blessing from the
Luster of your gracious Beames, you shall make your vassaile happy, in that
hee yet doth live to shew how ready hee is, and alwayes hath bin, to
sacrifice his dearest blood, as becometh a loyall subject, for the honor of his
native Country. Being
your humors humble vassaile
Thomas Morton.

Page 89

The Epistle to the Reader.

GENTLE READER,
present to the publike view an abstract of New England,
which I have undertaken to compose by the
incouragment of such genious spirits as have been
studious of the inlargment of his Majesties Territories;
being not formerly satisfied by the relations of such as,
through haste, have taken but a superficiall survey
thereof: which thing time hath enabled mee to performe
more punctually to the life, and to give a more exact
accompt of what hath been required. I have therefore beene willing to doe
my indevoure to communicat the knowledge which I have gained and
collected together, by mine owne observation in the time of my many
yeares residence in those parts, to my loving Country men: For the better
information of all such as are desirous to be made partakers of the blessings
of God in that fertile Soyle, as well as those {8} that, out of Curiosity onely,
have bin inquisitive after nouelties. And the rather for that I have observed
how divers persons (not so well affected to the weale publike in mine
opinion), out of respect to their owne private ends, have laboured to keepe
both the practise of the people there, and the Reall worth of that eminent
Country concealed from publike knowledge; both which I have abundantly
in this discourse layd open: yet if it be well accepted, I shall esteeme my
selfe sufficiently rewardded for my undertaking, and rest,
Your Wellwisher.

Thomas Morton.

Page 90

In laudem Authoris.

T’ Excuse the Author ere the worke be shewne
Is accusation in it selfe alone;
And to commend him might seeme oversight;
So divers are th’ opinions of this age,
So quick and apt, to taxe the moderne stage,
That hard his taske is that must please in all:
Example have wee from great Cæsars fall.
But is the sonne to be dislik’d and blam’d,
Because the mole is of his face asham’d?
The fault is in the beast, not in the sonne;
Give sicke mouthes sweete meates, fy! they relish none.
But to the sound in censure, he commends
His love unto his Country; his true ends,
To modell out a Land of so much worth
As untill now noe traveller setteth[197] forth;
Faire Canaans second selfe, second to none,
Natures rich Magazine till now unknowne.
Then here survay what nature hath in store,
And graunt him love for this. He craves no more.

R. O. Gen.

Page 91

Sir Christoffer Gardiner, Knight.[198]
In laudem Authoris.

This worke a matchles mirror is, that shewes
The Humors of the seperatiste, and those
So truely personated by thy pen.
I was amaz’d to see’t; herein all men
May plainely see, as in an inter-lude,
Each actor figure; and the scæne well view’d
In Comick,[199] Tragick, and in a pastorall strife,[200]
For tyth of mint[201] and Cummin, shewes their life
Nothing but opposition gainst the right
Of sacred Majestie: men full of spight,
Goodnes abuseing, turning vertue out
Of Dores, to whipping, stocking, and full bent
To plotting mischeife gainst the innocent,
Burning their houses, as if ordained by fate,
In spight of Lawe, to be made ruinate.
This taske is well perform’d, and patience be
Thy present comfort, and thy constancy
Thine honor; and this glasse, where it shall come,
Shall sing thy praises till the day of doome.

Sir C. G.

Page 92

In laudem Authoris.

Bvt that I rather pitty, I confesse,
The practise of their Church, I could expresse
Myselfe a Satyrist, whose smarting fanges
Should strike it with a palsy, and the panges
Beget a feare to tempt the Majesty
Of those, or mortall Gods. Will they defie
The Thundring Jove? Like children they desire,
Such is their zeale, to sport themselves with fire:
So have I seene an angry Fly presume
To strike a burning taper, and consume
His feeble wings. Why, in an aire so milde,
Are they so monstrous growne up, and so vilde,
That Salvages can of themselves espy
Their errors, brand their names with infamy?
What! is their zeale for blood like Cyrus thirst?
Will they be over head and eares a curst?
A cruell way to found a Church on! noe,
T’is not their zeale but fury blinds them soe,
And pricks their malice on like fier to joyne,
And offer up the sacrifice of Kain.
Jonas, thou hast done well to call these men
Home to repentance, with thy painefull pen.

F. C. Armiger.

Page 93

NEW ENGLISH CANAAN,
OR
NEW CANAAN.

The Author’s Prologue.

If art and industry should doe as much
As Nature hath for Canaan, not such
Another place, for benefit and rest,
In all the universe can be possest.
The more we proove it by discovery,
The more delight each object to the eye
Procures; as if the elements had here
Bin reconcil’d, and pleas’d it should appeare
Like a faire virgin, longing to be sped
And meete her lover in a Nuptiall bed,
Deck’d in rich ornaments t’ advaunce her state
And excellence, being most fortunate
When most enjoy’d: so would our Canaan be
If well imploy’d by art and industry;
Whose offspring now, shewes that her fruitfull wombe,
Not being enjoy’d, is like a glorious tombe,
Admired things producing which there dye,
And ly fast bound in darck obscurity:
The worth of which, in each particuler,
Who list to know, this abstract will declare.

Page 94

NEW ENGLISH CANAAN,
OR
NEW CANAAN.

The first Booke.

Containing the originall of the Natives, their manners &
Customes, with their tractable nature and love towards the
English.

Chap. I.

Prooving New England the principall part of all America, and
most commodious and fitt for habitation.
He wise Creator of the universall Globe hath placed a
golden meane betwixt two extreames; I meane the
temperate Zones, betwixt the hote and cold; and every
Creature, that participates of Heavens blessings with in
the Compasse of that golden meane, is made most {12}
apt and fit for man to use, who likewise by that
wisedome is ordained to be the Lord of all. This globe
may be his glasse, to teach him how to use moderation
and discretion, both in his actions and intentions. The wise man sayes, give
mee neither riches nor poverty; why? Riches might make him proud like

Page 95

Nebuchadnezar, and poverty despaire like Iobs wife; but a meane betweene
both. So it is likewise in the use of Vegetatives, that Vse of vegetatives.
which hath too much Heate or too much Colde, is said
to be venenum: so in the use of sensitives, all those Animals, of what genus
or species soever they be, if they participate of heate or cold in the
superlative are said to be Inimica naturæ, as in some Fishes about the Isle
of Sall, and those Ilandes adjoyninge between the Tropickes; their
participatinge of heate and cold, in the superlative, is Fish poysonous about
made most manifest, one of which poysoned a whole the Isle of Sall.
[202]
Ships company that eate of it. And so it is in
Vipers, Toades, and Snakes, that have heate or cold in the superlative
degree.
Therefore the Creatures that participate of heate and cold in a meane, are
best and holsomest: And so it is in the choyse of love, the middell Zone
betweene the two extreames is best, and it is therefore Zona temperata, the
called Zona temperata, and is in the golden meane; Golden meane.
and all those landes lying under that Zone, most
requisite and fitt for habitation. In Cosmography, the two extreames are
called, the one Torrida Zona, lying betweene the Tropickes, the other
Frigida Zona, lying neare the poles: all the landes lying under either of
these Zones, by reason they doe participate too {13} much of heate or cold,
are very inconvenient, and are accompanied with many evils. And allthough
I am not of opinion with Aristotle,[203] that the landes under Torrida Zona
are alltogether uninhabited, I my selfe having beene so neare the
equinoctiall line that I have had the Sunn for my Zenith and seene proofe to
the contrary, yet cannot I deny but that it is accompanied with many
inconveniences, as that Fish and Flesh both will taint in those partes,
notwithstanding the use of Salt which cannot be wanting there, ordained by
natures hande-worke; And that is a great hinderance to Salt aboundeth under
the settinge forth and supply of navigation, the very the Tropicks.
Sinewes of a florishing Commonwealth. Then
barrennesse, caused through want of raines, for in most of those partes of
the world it is seldome accustomed to raine untill the time of the Tornathees
(as the Portingals[204] phrase is, who lived there) and Raine 40. dayes about
then it will raine about 40. dayes together, which August betweene
moisture serveth to fructify the earth for all the yeare Cancer and the Line.
after, duringe which time is seene no raine at all: the

Page 96

heate and cold, and length of day and night, being much alike, with little
difference. And these raines are caused by the turning of the windes, which
else betweene the Tropickes doe blow Trade, that is allwayes one way. For
next the Tropicke of Cancer it is constantly North-East, and next the
Tropicke of Capricorne it is Southwest; so that the windes comming from
the Poles, do keepe the aire in those partes coole, and make it temperate and
the partes habitable, were it not for those and other inconveniences.
{14} This Torrida Zona is good for Grashoppers: and Zona Temperata for
the Ant and Bee. But Frigida Zona [is] good for neither, as by lamentable
experience of Captaine Davis fate is manifest, who in Capt. Davis froze to
his inquest of the Northwest passage for the East India death.
trade was frozen to death.[205] And therefore, for
Frigida Zona, I agree with Aristotle that it is unfit for habitation:[206] and I
know by the Course of the cælestiall globe that in Groeneland, many
Degrees short of the Pole Articke, the place is too cold, Groene Land too cold
by reason of the Sunns absence almost six monethes, for habitation.
and the land under the continuall power of the frost;
which thinge many more Navigators have prooved with pittifull experience
of their wintringe there, as appeareth by the history. I thinke they will not
venture to winter there againe for an India mine.
And as it is found by our Nation under the Pole Sir Ferdinando
Articke, so it is likewise to be found under the Gorges the originall
Antarticke Pole; yet what hazard will not an cause of plantinge
industrious minde and couragious spirit undergoe, New England.
according to that of the Poet: Impiger extremos currit Mercator ad Indos
per mare pauperiem fugiens, per saxa, per ignes.[207] And all to gett and
hord up like the Ant and the Bee; and yet, as Salomon saith,[208] he cannot
tell whether a foole or a wise man shall enjoy it. Therefore let us leave these
two extreames, with their inconveniences, and indeavour to finde out this
golden meane, so free from any one of them. Behold the secret wisedome of
allmighty God, and love unto our Salomon, to raise a man of a lardge hart,
full of worthy abilities, to be the Index or Loadstarre, that doth point out
{15} unto the English Nation with ease and comfort how to finde it out. And
this the noble minded Gentleman, Sir Ferdinando Gorges,[209] Knight,
zealous for the glory of God, the honor of his Majesty and the benefit of the
weale publicke, hath done a great worke for the good of his Country.

Page 97

And herein this, the wondrous wisedome and love of The Salvages dyed of
God, is shewne, by sending to the place his Minister, the plague.
to sweepe away by heapes the Salvages; and also
giving him length of dayes to see the same performed after his enterprise
was begunne, for the propagation of the Church of Christ.
This judicious Gentleman hath found this goulden meane to be scituated
about the middle of those two extreames, and for directions you may proove
it thus: Counting the space betweene the Line and either of the Poles, in true
proportion, you shall finde it to be 90. Degrees: then must we finde the
meane to be neare unto the Center of 90. and that is about 45. Degrees, and
then incline unto the Sotherne side of that Center, properly for the benefit of
heate, remembringe that Sol & Homo generàt hominem; and then keepe us
on that same side, and see what Land is to be found there, and we shall
easily discerne that new England is on the South side of that Center.
For that Country doth beginne her boundes at 40. New Engl. is placed
Degrees of Northerne latitude, and endes at 45. in the golden meane.
Degrees of the same latitude, and doth participate of
heate and cold indifferently, but is oppressed with neither: and therefore
may be truly sayd to be within the compasse of that golden meane, most apt
and fit {16} for habitation and generation, being placed by Allmighty God,
the great Creator, under that Zone called Zona temperata; and is therefore
most fitt for the generation and habitation of our English nation, of all other,
who are more neere neighbours to the Northerne Pole, whose Land lyeth
betweene 50. and 54. Degrees of the selfesame latitude: now this new
England, though it be nearer to the line then that old New England 10.
England by 10. Degrees of latitude, yet doth not this Degrees neerer the
exceede that other in heate or cold, by reason of the line then old England.
cituation of it; for as the Coast lyeth, being circularly
Northeast and Southwest, opposite towards the Sunnes risinge, which
makes his course over the Ocean, it can have litle or no reflecting heat of
the Sun-beames, by reason of the continuall motion of the waters makinge
the aire there the cooler and the constanter; so that for the temperature of
the Climent, sweetnesse of the aire, fertility of the Soile, and small number
of the Salvages (which might seeme a rubb in the way off an effeminate
minde,) this Country of new England is by all judicious men accounted the
principall part of all America for habitation and the commodiousnesse of

Page 98

the Sea, Ships there not being subject to wormes as in Virginea and other
places, and not to be paraleld in all Christendome. The The Massachussets in
Massachussets, being the middell part thereof, is a the middel of New
very beautifull Land, not mountany nor inclininge to England.
mountany, lyeth in 42. Degrees, and 30. minutes, and
hath as yet[210] the greatest number of inhabitants; and hath a very large bay
to it divided by Islands into 4 great bayes,[211] where shippinge may safely
ride, {17} all windes and weathers, the windes in those The Windes not so
partes being not so violent as in England by many violent in New
Degrees: for there are no shrubbs seene to leane from England.
the windes, as by the Sea Coast of England I have
seene them leane, and the groundage is a sandy sleech,[212] free from rockes
to gaule Cables, but is good for anchorage: the rest of the Planters are
disperst among the Coasts betweene 41. and 44. Degrees of Latitude, and as
yet, have [made] very little way into the inland.[213] The riches of which
Country I have set forth in this abstract as in a Landskipp, for the better
information of the Travellers; which hee may peruse and plainely perceave
by the demonstration of it, that it is nothing inferior to Canaan of Israel, but
a kind of paralell to it in all points.

Page 99

Chap. II.

Of the originall of the Natives.
In the yeare since the incarnation of Christ, 1622, it was my chance to be
landed in the parts of New England,[214] where I found two sortes of people,
the one Christians, the other Infidels; these I found most full of humanity,
and more friendly then the other: as shall hereafter be made apparant in
Dew-Course by their severall actions from time to time, whilest I lived
among them. After my arrivall in those partes, I endeavoured by all the
wayes and meanes that I could to find out from what people, or nation, the
Natives of {18} New England might be conjectured originlly to proceede;
and by continuance and conversation amongst them, I attaned to so much of
their language, as by all probable conjecture may make the same manifest:
for it hath been found by divers, and those of good judgement, that the
Natives of this Country doe use very many wordes, both of Greeke and
Latine, to the same signification that the Latins and The Natives have a
Greekes have done; as en animia,[215] when an Indian mixed language.
expresseth that hee doth anything with a good will;
and Pascopan[216] signifieth gredy gut, this being the Pasco Pan greedy
name of an Indian that was so called of a Child, gutt.
through the greedinesse of his minde and much eating,
for Pasco in Latine signifieth to feede, and Pan in Greeke signifieth all; and
Pasco nantum,[217] quasi pasco nondum, halfe starved, or not eating, as yet;
Equa coge,[218] set it upright; Mona[219] is an Island in Mona an Island.
their language, quasi Monon, that is alone, for an
Island is a peece or plott of ground standing alone, and devided from the
mane Land by force of water.
Cos[220] is a Whetstone with them. Hame[221] an Cos a Whetstone.
instrument to take fish. Many places doe retaine the
name of Pan, as Pantneket[222] and Matta pan,[223] so that it may be thought
that these people heretofore have had the name of Pan in great reverence
and estimation, and it may bee have worshipped Pan Pan the Shepheards
the great God of the Heathens: Howsoever they doe God.

Page 100

use no manner of worship at all now: and it is most likely that the Natives
of this Country are descended from people bred upon that part of the world
which is towardes {19} the Tropicke of Cancer, for they doe still retaine the
memory of some of the Starres one that part of the Cælestiall Globe, as the
North-starre, which with them is called Maske,[224] for Maske in their
Language signifieth a Beare: and they doe divide the windes into eight
partes, and it seemes originally have had some litterature amongst them,
which time hath Cancelled and worne out of use.
And whereas it hath beene the opinion of some men, which shall be
nameles, that the Natives of New-England may proceede from the race of
the Tartars, and come from Tartaria into those partes,[225] over the frozen
Sea, I see no probality for any such Conjecture; for as Not to proceede from
much as a people once setled must be remooved by the Tartars.
compulsion, or else tempted thereunto in hope of
better fortunes, upon commendations of the place unto which they should
be drawne to remoove: and if it may be thought that these people came over
the frozen Sea, then would it be by compulsion? if so, then by whome, or
when? or what part of this mane continent may be No part of America
thought to border upon the Country of the Tartars, it is knowne to be neare
yet unknowne: and it is not like, that a people well Tartary.
enough at ease will of their one accord undertake to
travayle over a Sea of Ice, considering how many difficulties they shall
encounter with; as first, whether there be any Land at the end of their
unknowne way, no Land beinge in view; then want of Food to sustane life
in the meane time upon that Sea of Ice; or {20} how should they doe for
Fuell, to keepe them at night from freezing to death, which will not bee had
in such a place. But it may perhaps be granted that the Natives of this
Country might originally come of the scattred Trojans: For after that Brutus,
who was the forth from Aneas, left Latium upon the Why Brutus left
conflict had with the Latines, (where although hee Latium.
gave them a great overthrow, to the Slaughter of their
grand Captaine and many other of the Heroes of Latium, yet hee held it
more safety to depart unto some other place and people, then by staying to
runne the hazard of an unquiet life or doubtfull Conquest, which as history
maketh mention hee performed,) this people were dispersed: there is no
question but the people that lived with him, by reason of their conversation

Page 101

with the Græcians and Latines, had a mixed language that participated of
both, whatsoever was that which was proper to their owne nation at first I
know not: for this is commonly seene where 2. nations traffique together,
the one indevouring to understand the others meaning makes them both
many times speak a mixed language, as is approoved Two nations meetinge
by the Natives of New England, through the coveteous make a mixt
desire they have to commerce with our nation and wee language.
with them.
And when Brutus did depart from Latium, we doe not finde that his whole
number went with him at once, or arrived at one place; and being put to Sea
might encounter with a storme that would carry them out of sight of Land,
and then they might sayle God knoweth whether, and so might be put upon
this {21} Coast, as well as any other. Compasse I beleeve they had none in
those dayes; Sayles they might have, (which Dædalus the first inventor
thereof left to after ages, having taught his Sonne Dædalus the first that
Icarus the use of it, who to this Cost found how used Sayles.
dangerous it is for a Sonne not to observe the precepts
of a wise Father, so that the Icarian Sea now retaines Icarus the second that
used Sayles.
the memory of it to this day,) and Victuals they might
have good store, and many other things fittinge; oares without all question
they would store themselves with, in such a case; but for the use of
Compasse, there is no mention made of it at that time (which was much
about Sauls time, the first that was made King of Troy destroyed about
Israell.) Yet it is thought (and that not without good Sauls time.
reason for it) that the use of the Loadstone and
Compasse was knowne in Salomons time, for as much as hee sent Shippes
to fetch of the gould of Ophir, to adorne and bewtify The Loadstone in
that magnificent Temple of Hierusalem by him built Salomons time.
for the glory of Almighty God, and by his speciall
appointment: and it is held by Cosmographers to be 3. yeares voyage from
Hierusalem to Ophir, and it is conceaved that such a voyage could not have
beene performed, without the helpe of the Loadstone and Compasse.
And why should any man thinke the Natives of New England to be the
gleanings of all Nations, onely because by the pronunciation and
termination their words seeme to trench upon severall languages, when time
hath not furnished him with the interpretation thereof. The thinge that must

Page 102

induce a man of reasonable capacity to any maner of conjecture of {22} their
originall, must be the sence and signification of the words, principally to
frame this argument by, when hee shall drawe to any conclusion thereupon:
otherwise hee shall but runne rounde about a maze (as some of the
fantasticall tribe use to do about the tythe of mint[226] and comin.)
Therefore, since I have had the approbation of Sir Christopher Gardiner,[227]
Knight, an able gentl. that lived amongst them, and of David Tompson,[228]
a Scottish gentl. that likewise was conversant with those people, both
Scollers and Travellers that were diligent in taking notice of these things, as
men of good judgement, and that have bin in those parts any time, besides
others of lesse, now I am bold to conclude that the originall of the Natives
of New England may be well conjectured to be from the scattered Trojans,
after such time as Brutus departed from Latium.[229]

Page 103

Chap. III.

Of a great mortality that happened amongst the Natives of New
England, neere about the time that the English came there to
plant.
It fortuned some few yeares before the English came to inhabit at new
Plimmouth, in New England, that upon some distast given in the
Massachussets bay by Frenchmen, then trading there with the Natives for
beaver, they set upon the men at such advantage that they killed manie of
them, burned their shipp, {23} then riding at Anchor by an Island there, now
called Peddocks Island,[230] in memory of Leonard Peddock[231] that landed
there, (where many wilde Anckies[232] haunted that time, which hee thought
had bin tame,) distributing them unto 5. Sachems, which were Lords of the
severall territories adjoyninge: they did keepe them so longe as they lived,
onely to sport themselves at them, and made these five Five Frenchmen kept
Frenchmen fetch them wood and water, which is the by the Salvages.
generall worke that they require of a servant.[233] One
of these five men, out livinge the rest, had learned so much of their
language as to rebuke them for their bloudy deede, saying that God would
be angry with them for it, and that hee would in his displeasure destroy
them; but the Salvages (it seemes boasting of their strenght,) replyed and
sayd, that they were so many that God could not kill them.[234]
But contrary wise, in short time after the hand of God The Plague fell on the
fell heavily upon them, with such a mortall stroake that Indians.
they died on heapes as they lay in their houses; and the
living, that were able to shift for themselves, would runne away and let
them dy, and let there Carkases ly above the ground without buriall. For in a
place where many inhabited, there hath been but one left a live to tell what
became of the rest; the livinge being (as it seemes) not able to bury the
dead, they were left for Crowes, Kites and vermin to The livinge not able to
pray upon. And the bones and skulls upon the severall bury the dead.
places of their habitations made such a spectacle after
my comming into those partes, that, as I travailed in that Forrest nere the
Massachussets, it seemed to mee a new found Golgatha.

Page 104

{24} But otherwise, it is the custome of those Indian people to bury their
dead ceremoniously and carefully, and then to abandon that place, because
they have no desire the place should put them in minde of mortality: and
this mortality was not ended when the Brownists of new Plimmouth were
setled at Patuxet in New England: and by all likelyhood the sicknesse that
these Indians died of was the Plague, as by conference with them since my
arrivall and habitation in those partes, I have learned.[235] And by this
meanes there is as yet but a small number of Salvages in New England, to
that which hath beene in former time, and the place is 2 Sam. 24.
made so much the more fitt for the English Nation to
inhabit in, and erect in it Temples to the glory of God.

Page 105

Chap. IV.

Of their Houses and Habitations.
The Natives of New England are accustomed to build them houses much
like the wild Irish; they gather Poles in the woodes and put the great end of
them in the ground, placinge them in forme of a circle or circumference,
and, bendinge the topps of them in forme of an Arch, they bind them
together with the Barke of Walnut trees, which is wondrous tuffe, so that
they make the same round on the Topp {25} for the smooke of their fire to
assend and passe through; these they cover with matts, some made of reeds
and some of longe flagges, or sedge, finely sowed together with needles
made of the splinter bones of a Cranes legge, with threeds made of their
Indian hempe, which their groueth naturally, leaving severall places for
dores, which are covered with mats, which may be rowled up and let downe
againe at their pleasures, making use of the severall dores, according as the
winde sitts.[236] The fire is alwayes made in the middest of the house, with
winde fals commonly: yet some times they fell a tree that groweth neere the
house, and, by drawing in the end thereof, maintaine the fire on both sids,
burning the tree by Degrees shorter and shorter, untill it be all consumed;
for it burneth night and day. Their lodging is made in three places of the
house about the fire; they lye upon plankes, commonly about a foote or 18.
inches aboue the ground, raised upon railes that are borne up upon forks;
they lay mats under them, and Coats of Deares skinnes, otters, beavers,
Racownes, and of Beares hides, all which they have dressed and converted
into good lether, with the haire on, for their coverings: and in this manner
they lye as warme as they desire.[237] In the night they take their rest; in the
day time, either the kettle is on with fish or flesh, by no allowance, or else
the fire is imployed in roasting of fishes, which they delight in.[238] The aire
doeth beget good stomacks, and they feede continually, and are no niggards
of their vittels; for they are willing that any one shall eate with them. Nay, if
any one that shall come into their {26} houses and there fall a sleepe, when
they see him disposed to lye downe, they will spreade a matt for him of
their owne accord, and lay a roule of skinnes for a boulster, and let him lye.
If hee sleepe untill their meate be dished up, they will set a wooden boule of

Page 106

meate by him that sleepeth, and wake him saying, Cattup keene
Meckin[239]: That is, If you be hungry, there is meat for you, where if you
will eate you may. Such is their Humanity.[240]
Likewise, when they are minded to remoove, they carry away the mats with
them; other materiales the place adjoyning will yeald. They use not to
winter and summer in one place, for that would be a reason to make fuell
scarse; but, after the manner of the gentry of Civilized natives, remoove for
their pleasures; some times to their hunting places, where they remaine
keeping good hospitality for that season; and sometimes to their fishing
places, where they abide for that season likewise: and at the spring, when
fish comes in plentifully, they have meetinges from severall places, where
they exercise themselves in gaminge and playing of juglinge trickes and all
manner of Revelles, which they are deligted in; [so] that it is admirable to
behould what pastime they use of severall kindes, every one striving to
surpasse each other.[241] After this manner they spend their time.

Page 107

{27} Chap. V.

Of their Religion.
It has bin a common receaved opinion from Cicero,[242] that there is no
people so barbarous but have some worshipp or other. In this particular, I
am not of opinion therein with Tully; and, surely, if hee had bin amongst
those people so longe as I have bin, and conversed so much with them
touching this matter of Religion, hee would have changed his opinion.
Neither should we have found this error, amongst the rest, by the helpe of
that wodden prospect,[243] if it had not been so unadvisedly built upon such
highe land as that Coast (all mens judgements in generall,) doth not yeeld,
had hee but taken the judiciall councell of Sir William Alexander, that setts
this thing forth in an exact and conclusive sentence; if hee be not too
obstinate? hee would graunt that worthy writer, that these people are sine
fide, sine lege, & sine rege,[244] and hee hath exemplified this thinge by a
familiar demonstration, which I have by longe experience observed to be
true.
And, me thinks, it is absurd to say they have a kinde of worship, and not
able to demonstrate whome or what it is they are accustomed to worship.
For my part I am more willing to beleeve that the Elephants (which are
reported to be the most intelligible of all beasts) doe worship the moone, for
the reasons {28} given by the author of this report, as Mr. Thomas May, the
minion of the Muses dos recite it in his continuation of Lucans historicall
poem,[245] rather then this man: to that I must bee constrained, to conclude
against him, and Cicero, that the Natives of New England have no worship
nor religion at all; and I am sure it has been so observed by those that neede
not the helpe of a wodden prospect for the matter.

Page 108

Chap. VI.

Of the Indians apparrell.
The Indians in these parts do make their apparrell of the skinnes of severall
sortes of beastes, and commonly of those that doe frequent those partes
where they doe live; yet some of them, for variety, will have the skinnes of
such beasts that frequent the partes of their neighbors, which they purchase
of them by Commerce and Trade.
These skinnes they convert into very good lether, The Indians make
making the same plume and soft. Some of these good lether.
skinnes they dresse with the haire on, and some with
the haire off; the hairy side in winter time they weare next their bodies, and
in warme weather they weare the haire outwardes: they make likewise some
Coates of the Feathers of Turkies, which they weave together with twine of
their owne makinge, very prittily: these garments they weare like mantels
knit over {29} their shoulders, and put under their arme: they have likewise
another sort of mantels, made of Mose skinnes, which beast is a great large
Deere so bigge as a horse; these skinnes they commonly dresse bare, and
make them wondrous white, and stripe them with size Indians ingenious
round about the borders, in forme like lace set on by a workemen for their
Taylor, and some they stripe with size in workes of garments.
severall fashions very curious, according to the
severall fantasies of the workemen, wherein they strive to excell one
another: And Mantels made of Beares skinnes is an usuall wearinge, among
the Natives that live where the Beares doe haunt: they make shooes of Mose
skinnes, which is the principall leather used to that purpose; and for want of
such lether (which is the strongest) they make shooes of Deeres skinnes,
very handsomly and commodious; and, of such deeres skinnes as they
dresse bare, they make stockinges that comes within their shooes, like a
stirrop stockinge, and is fastned above at their belt, which is about their
middell; Every male, after hee attaines unto the age The modesty of the
which they call Pubes, wereth a belt about his middell, Indian men.
and a broad peece of lether that goeth betweene his
leggs and is tuckt up both before and behinde under that belt; and this they

Page 109

weare to hide their secreats of nature, which by no meanes they will suffer
to be seene, so much modesty they use in that particular; those garments
they allwayes put on, when they goe a huntinge, to keepe their skinnes from
the brush of the Shrubbs: and when they have their Apparrell one they looke
like Irish in {30} their trouses, the Stockinges joyne so to their breeches. A
good well growne deere skin is of great account with them, and it must have
the tale on, or else they account it defaced; the tale being three times as long
as the tales of our English Deere, yea foure times so longe, this when they
travell is raped round about their body, and, with a Indians travaile with
girdle of their making, bound round about their materials to strike fire
middles, to which girdle is fastned a bagg, in which his at all times.
instruments be with which hee can strike fire upon any
occasion.[246]
Thus with their bow in their left hand, and their quiuer of Arrowes at their
back, hanging one their left shoulder with the lower end of it in their right
hand, they will runne away a dogg trot untill they come to their journey
end; and, in this kinde of ornament, they doe seeme to me to be hansomer
then when they are in English apparrell, their gesture being answerable to
their one habit and not unto ours.
Their women have shooes and stockinges to weare likewise when they
please, such as the men have, but the mantle they use to cover their
nakednesse with is much longer then that which the men use; for, as the
men have one Deeres skinn, the women have two soed together at the full
lenght, and it is so lardge that it trailes after them like a great Ladies trane;
and in time I thinke they may have their Pages to beare them up; and where
the men use but one Beares skinn for a Mantle, the women have two soed
together; and if any of their women would at any time shift one, they take
that which they intend to make use of, and {31} cast it over them round,
before they shifte away the other, for modesty, being unwilling to be seene
to discover their nakednesse; and the one being so cast The Indians ashamed
over, they slip the other from under them in a decent of their nakednesse.
manner, which is to be noted in people uncivilized;
therein they seeme to have as much modesty as civilized people, and
deserve to be applauded for it.[247]

Page 110

Chap. VII.

Of their Child-bearing, and delivery, and what manner of
persons they are.
The women of this Country are not suffered to be used for procreation untill
the ripenesse of their age, at which time they weare a redd cap made of
lether, in forme like to our flat caps, and this they weare for the space of 12
moneths, for all men to take notice of them that have any minde to a wife;
and then it is the custome of some of their Sachems or Lords of the
territories, to have the first say or maidenhead of the females.[248] Very apt
they are to be with childe, and very laborious when they beare children;
yea, when they are as great as they can be: yet in that The women big with
case they neither forbeare laboure, nor travaile; I have child very laborious.
seene them in that plight with burthens at their backs
enough to load a horse; yet doe they not miscarry, but have a faire delivery,
and a quick: their women are very good midwifes, and the women very
lusty after {32} delivery, and in a day or two will travell or trudge about.[249]
Their infants are borne with haire on their heads, and are of complexion
white as our nation; but their mothers in their infancy Children bathed to
make a bath of Wallnut leaves, huskes of Walnuts, and staine the skinne.
such things as will staine their skinne for ever, wherein
they dip and washe them to make them tawny[250]; the coloure of their haire
is black, and their eyes black. These infants are carried at their mothers
backs by the help of a cradle made of a board forket at both ends, whereon
the childe is fast bound and wrapped in furres; his knees thrust up towards
his bellie, because they may be the more usefull for them when he sitteth,
which is as a dogge does on his bumme: and this cradle surely preserues
them better then the cradles of our nation, for as much as we finde them
well proportioned, not any of them crooked backed or wry legged: and to
give their charracter in a worde, they are as proper men and women for
feature and limbes as can be found, for flesh and bloud as active: longe
handed they are, (I never sawe a clunchfisted Salvadg amongst them all in
my time.)[251] The colour of their eies being so generally black made a
Salvage, that had a younge infant whose eies were gray, shewed him to us,

Page 111

and said they were English mens eies; I tould the Father that his sonne was
nan weeteo, which is a bastard; hee replied titta Cheshetue squaa,[252]
which is, hee could not tell, his wife might play the whore; and this childe
the father desired might have an English name, because of the litenesse[253]
of his eies, which his father had in admiration because of novelty amongst
their nation.

Page 112

{33} Chap. VIII.

Of their Reverence, and respect to age.
It is a thing to be admired, and indeede made a Age honoured among
president, that a Nation yet uncivilizied should more the Indians.
respect age then some nations civilized, since there are
so many precepts both of divine and humane writers extant to instruct more
Civill Nations: in that particular, wherein they excell, the younger are
allwayes obedient unto the elder people, and at their commaunds in every
respect without grummbling;[254] in all councels, (as therein they are
circumspect to do their acciones by advise and councell, and not rashly or
inconsiderately,) the younger mens opinion shall be heard, but the old mens
opinion and councell imbraced and followed: besides, as the elder feede and
provide for the younger in infancy, so doe the younger, after being growne
to yeares of manhood, provide for those that be aged: and in distribution of
Acctes the elder men are first served by their dispensator; and their counsels
(especially if they be powahs) are esteemed as oracles amongst the younger
Natives.
The consideration of these things, mee thinkes, should reduce some of our
irregular young people of civilized Nations, when this story shall come to
their knowledge, to better manners, and make them ashamed of their former
error in this kinde, and to {34} become hereafter more duetyfull; which I, as
a friend, (by observation having found,) have herein recorded for that
purpose.

Page 113

Chap. IX.

Of their pretty conjuring tricks.
If we doe not judge amisse of these Salvages in accounting them witches,
yet out of all question we may be bould to conclude them to be but weake
witches, such of them as wee call by the names of Powahs: some
correspondency they have with the Devil out of al doubt, as by some of
their accions, in which they glory, is manifested. Papasiquineo,[255] that
Sachem or Sagamore, is a Powah of greate estimation amongst all kinde of
Salvages there: hee is at their Revels (which is the time when a great
company of Salvages meete from severall parts of the Country, in amity
with their neighbours) hath advaunced his honor in his feats or jugling
tricks (as I may right tearme them) to the admiration of the spectators,
whome hee endevoured to perswade that he would goe under water to the
further side of a river, to broade for any man to undertake with a breath,
which thing hee performed by swimming over, and deluding the company
with casting a mist before their eies that see him enter in and come out, but
no part of the way hee has bin seene: likewise by our English, in the heat of
all summer to make Ice appeare in a bowle of faire water; first, having the
water set before him, hee hath begunne his incantation according to their
usuall accustome, and before the same has bin ended a thick Clowde has
darkned the {35} aire and, on a sodane, a thunder clap hath bin heard that
has amazed the natives; in an instant hee hath shewed a firme peece of Ice
to flote in the middest of the bowle in the presence of the vulgar people,
which doubtles was done by the agility of Satan, his consort.
And by meanes of these sleights, and such like trivial things as these, they
gaine such estimation amongst the rest of the Salvages that it is thought a
very impious matter for any man to derogate from the words of these
Powahs. In so much as hee that should slight them, is thought to commit a
crime no lesse hainous amongst them as sacriledge is with us, as may
appeare by this one passage, which I wil set forth for an instance.
A neighbour of mine that had entertain’d a Salvage A Salvage entertained
into his service, to be his factor for the beaver trade a factor.
amongst his countrymen, delivered unto him divers

Page 114

parcells of commodities fit for them to trade with; amongst the rest there
was one coate of more esteeme then any of the other, and with this his new
entertained marchant man travels amongst his countrymen to truck them
away for beaver: as our custome hath bin, the Salvage went up into the
Country amongst his neighbours for beaver, and returned with some, but
not enough answerable to his Masteers expectation, but being called to an
accompt, and especially for that one Coate of speciall note, made answer
that he had given that coate to Tantoquineo, a Powah: to which his master in
a rage cryed, what have I to doe with Tantoquineo? The Salvage, very angry
at the matter, cryed, what you speake? you are not a very good man; wil you
not give Tantoq. a coat? whats this? as if he had offered {36} Tantoquineo
the greatest indignity that could be devised: so great is the estimation and
reverence that these people have of these Iugling[256] Powahs, who are
usually sent for when any person is sicke and ill at ease to recover them, for
which they receive rewards as doe our Chirgeons and Phisitions; and they
doe make a trade of it, and boast of their skill where An Englishman cured
they come:[257] One amongst the rest did undertake to of a swelling.
cure an Englishman of a swelling of his hand for a
parcell of biskett, which being delivered him hee tooke the party greived
into the woods aside from company, and with the helpe of the devill, (as
may be conjectured,) quickly recovered him of that swelling, and sent him
about his worke againe.

Page 115

Chap. X.

Of their duels, and the honourable estimation of victory
obtained thereby.
These Salvages are not apt to quarrell one with another: yet such hath bin
the occasion that a difference hath happened which hath growne to that
height that it has not bin reconciled otherwise then by combat, which hath
bin performed in this manner: the two champions prepared for the fight,
with their bowes in hand and a quiver full of arrowes How the Salvages
at their backs, they have entered into the field; the performe theire
Challenger and challenged have chosen two trees, duells.
standing within {37} a little distance of each other; they
have cast lotts for the cheife of the trees, then either champion setting
himselfe behinde his tree watches an advantage to let fly his shafts, and to
gall his enemy; there they continue shooting at each other; if by chaunce
they espie any part open, they endeavour to gall the combatant in that part,
and use much agility in the performance of the taske they have in hand.
Resolute they are in the execution of their vengeance, when once they have
begunne; and will in no wise be daunted, or seeme to shrinck though they
doe catch a clap with an arrow, but fight it out in this manner untill one or
both be slaine.
I have bin shewed the places where such duels have bin performed, and
have fuond the trees marked for a memoriall of the Combat, where that
champion hath stood that had the hap to be slaine in Trees marked where
the duell: and they count it the greatest honor that can they performe a duell.
be to the serviving Cumbatant, to shew the scares of
the wounds received in this kinde of Conflict, and if it happen to be on the
arme, as those parts are most in danger in these cases, they will alwayes
weare a bracelet upon that place of the arme, as a trophy of honor to their
dying day.

Page 116

{38} Chap. XI.

Of the maintaining of their Reputation.
Reputation is such a thing that it keepes many men in awe, even amongst
Civilized nations, and is very much stood upon: it is (as one hath very well
noted) the awe of great men and of Kings. And, since I have observed it to
be maintained amongst Salvage people, I cannot chuse but give an instance
thereof in this treatise, to confirme the common receaved opinion thereof.
The Sachem or Sagamore of Sagus made choise, when hee came to mans
estate, of a Lady of noble discent, Daughter to Papasiquineo, the Sachem or
Sagamore of the territories neare Merrimack River, a man of the best note
and estimation in all those parts, and (as my Countryman Mr. Wood
declares in his prospect) a great Nigromancer; this A marriage.
Lady the younge Sachem with the consent and good
liking of her father marries, and takes for his wife.[258] Great entertainement
hee and his receaved in those parts at her fathers hands, where they weare
fested in the best manner that might be expected, according to the Custome
of their nation, with reveling and such other solemnities as is usuall
amongst them. The solemnity being ended, Papasiquineo causes a selected
number of his men to waite upon his Daughter home into those parts that
did properly belong to her Lord and husband; where the attendants had
entertainment by the Sachem of Sagus and his Countrymen: the solemnity
being ended, the attendants were gratified.
Not long after the new married Lady had a great {39} desire to see her father
and her native country, from whence shee came; her Lord willing to
pleasure her and not deny her request, amongst them thought to be
reasonable, commanded a selected number of his owne men to conduct his
Lady to her Father, wher, with great respect, they brought her; and, having
feasted there a while, returned to their owne country againe, leaving the
Lady to continue there at her owne pleasure, amongst her friends and old
acquaintance; where shee passed away the time for a while, and in the end
desired to returne to her Lord againe. Her father, the An ambassage sent
old Papasiquineo, having notice of her intent, sent from Papasiquineo to
some of his men on ambassage to the younge Sachem,

Page 117

his sonne in law, to let him understand that his his sonne in law, a
Sachem.
daughter was not willing to absent her selfe from his
company any longer, and therfore, as the messengers had in charge, desired
the younge Lord to send a convoy for her; but hee, standing upon tearmes
of honor, and the maintaining of his reputation, returned to his father in law
this answere, that, when she departed from him, hee caused his men to
waite upon her to her fathers territories, as it did become him; but, now shee
had an intent to returne, it did become her father to send her back with a
convoy of his own people; and that it stood not with his reputation to make
himself or his men so servile, to fetch her againe. The old Sachem
Papasiquineo, having this message returned, was inraged to think that his
young son in law did not esteeme him at a higher rate then to capitulate
with him about the matter, and returne[d] him this sharpe reply; that his
daughters bloud and birth deserved more respect then to be so slighted; and,
therefore, if he would have her company, hee were best to send or come for
her.
{40} The younge Sachem, not willing to under value himselfe and being a
man of a stout spirit, did not stick to say that hee should either send her by
his owne Convey, or keepe her; for hee was determined not[259] to stoope so
lowe.
So much these two Sachems stood upon tearmes of reputation with each
other, the one would not send her, and the other would not send for her,
least it should be any diminishing of honor on his part that should seeme to
comply, that the Lady (when I came out of the Country) remained still with
her father; which is a thinge worth the noting, that Salvage people should
seeke to maintaine their reputation so much as they doe.

Page 118

Chap. XII.

Of their trafficke and trade one with another.
Although these people have not the use of navigation, whereby they may
trafficke as other nations, that are civilized, use to doe, yet doe they barter
for such commodities as they have, and have a kinde Beads instead of
of beads, insteede of money, to buy withall such things Money.
as they want, which they call Wampampeak: and it is
of two sorts, the one is white, the other is of a violet coloure. These are
made of the shells of fishe. The white with them is as silver with us; the
other as our gould: and for these beads they buy and sell, not onely amongst
themselves, but even with us.
{41} We have used to sell them any of our commodities
The name of their
for this Wampampeak, because we know we can have beads Wampampeak.
beaver againe of them for it: and these beads are
currant in all the parts of New England, from one end of the Coast to the
other.
And although some have indevoured by example to have the like made of
the same kinde of shels, yet none hath ever, as yet, attained to any
perfection in the composure of them, but that the Salvages have found a
great difference to be in the one and the other; and have knowne the
counterfett beads from those of their owne making; and have, and doe slight
them.[260]
The skinnes of beasts are sould and bartered, to such people as have none of
the same kinde in the parts where they live.[261]
Likewise they have earthen potts of divers sizes, from a quarte to a gallon,
2. or 3. to boyle their vitels in; very stronge, though they be thin like our
Iron potts.
They have dainty wooden bowles of maple, of highe price amongst them;
and these are dispersed by bartering one with the other, and are but in
certaine parts of the Country made, where the severall trades are
appropriated to the inhabitants of those parts onely.

Page 119

So likewise (at the season of the yeare) the Salvages that live by the Sea
side for trade with the inlanders for fresh water, reles curious silver reles,
[262]
which are bought up of such as have them not frequent in other places:
chestnuts, and such like usefull {42} things as one place affordeth, are sould
to the inhabitants of another, where they are a novelty accompted amongst
the natives of the land.[263] And there is no such thing to barter withall, as is
their Whampampeake.

Page 120

Chap. XIII.

Of their Magazines or Storehowses.
These people are not without providence, though they be uncivilized, but
are carefull to preserve foede in store against winter; which is the corne that
they laboure and dresse in the summer. And, although What care they take to
they eate freely of it, whiles it is growinge, yet have lay up corne for
they a care to keepe a convenient portion thereof to winter.
releeve them in the dead of winter, (like to the Ant and
the Bee,) which they put under ground.
Their barnes are holes made in the earth, that will hold a Hogshead of corne
a peece in them. In these (when their corne is out of the huske and well
dried) they lay their store in greate baskets (which they make of Sparke[264])
with matts under, about the sides, and on the top; and putting it into the
place made for it, they cover it with earth: and in this manner it is preserved
from destruction or putrifaction; to be used in case of necessity, and not
else.[265]
[266]
{43} And I am perswaded, that if they knew the benefit of Salte (as they
may in time,) and the meanes to make salte meate fresh againe, they would
endeaver to preserve fishe for winter, as well as corne; and that if any thinge
bring them to civility, it will be the use of Salte, to have foode in store,
which is a cheife benefit in a civilized Commonwealth.
These people have begunne already to incline to the They begg Salte of the
use of Salte. Many of them would begge Salte of mee English.
for to carry home with them, that had frequented our
howses and had been acquainted with our Salte meats: and Salte I willingly
gave them, although I sould them all things else, onely because they should
be delighted with the use there of, and thinke it a commodity of no value in
it selfe, allthough the benefit was great that might be had by the use of it.

Page 121

Chap. XIV.

Of theire Subtilety.
These people are not, as some have thought, a dull, or slender witted
people, but very ingenious, and very subtile. I could give maine instances to
maintaine mine opinion of them in this; but I will onely relate one, which is
a passage worthy to be observed.
[267]
{44} In the Massachussets bay lived Cheecatawback, the Sachem or
Sagamore of those territories, who had large dominions which hee did
appropriate to himselfe.
Into those parts came a greate company of Salvages from the territories of
Narohiganset, to the number of 100. persons; and in this Sachems
Dominions they intended to winter.
When they went a hunting for turkies they spreade over such a greate scope
of ground that a Turkie could hardily escape them: Deare they killed up in
greate abundance, and feasted their bodies very plentifully: Beavers they
killed by no allowance; the skinnes of those they traded away at
Wassaguscus with my neighboures[268] for corne, and They trade away
such other commodities as they had neede of; and my beavers skinnes for
neighboures had a wonderfull great benefit by their corne.
being in those parts. Yea, sometimes (like genious
fellowes) they would present their Marchant with a fatt beaver skinne,
alwayes the tayle was not diminished, but presented full and whole;
although the tayle is a present for a Sachem,[269] and is A beaver skinne with
of such masculaine vertue that if some of our Ladies his tayle on of great
knew the benefit thereof they would desire to have estimacion.
ships sent of purpose to trade for the tayle alone: it is
such a rarity, as is not more esteemed of then reason doth require.
But the Sachem Cheecatawbak, (on whose possessions they usurped, and
converted the commodities thereof to their owne use, contrary to his
likeing,) not being of power to resist them, practised to doe it by a subtile
stratagem. And to that end {45} gave it out amongst us, A subtile plot of a
that the cause why these other Salvages of the

Page 122

Narohigansets came into these parts, was to see what Sachem.
strength we were of, and to watch an opportunity to
cut us off, and take that which they found in our custody usefull for them;
And added further, they would burne our howses, and that they had caught
one of his men, named Meshebro, and compelled him to discover to them
where their barnes, Magazines, or storehowses were, and had taken away
his corne; and seemed to be in a pittifull perplexity about the matter.
And, the more to adde reputation to this tale, desires that his wifes and
children might be harbered in one of our howses. This was graunted; and
my neighbours put on corslets, headpeeces, and weapons defensive and
offensive.
This thing being knowne to Cheecatawback, hee caused some of his men to
bring the Narohigansets to trade, that they might see the preparation. The
Salvage, that was a stranger to the plott, simply comming to trade, and
findding his merchants lookes like lobsters, all cladd in harnesse, was in a
maze to thinke what would be the end of it. Haste hee made to trade away
his furres, and tooke anything for them, wishing himselfe well rid of them
and of the company in the howse.
But (as the manner has bin) hee must eate some A Salvage scared.
furmety[270] before hee goe: downe hee sits and eats,
and withall had an eie on every side; and now and then saw a sword or a
dagger layd a thwart a head peece, which hee wondered at, and asked his
{46} giude whether the company were not angry. The guide, (that was privy
to his Lords plot) answered in his language that hee could not tell. But the
harmelesse Salvage, before hee had halfe filled his belly, started up on a
sodayne, and ranne out of the howse in such hast that hee left his furmety
there, and stayed not to looke behinde him who came after: Glad hee was
that he had escaped so.
The subtile Sachem, hee playd the tragedian, and fained a feare of being
surprised; and sent to see whether the enemies (as the Messenger termed
them) were not in the howse; and comes in a by way with his wifes and
children, and stopps the chinkes of the out howse, for feare the fire might be
seene in the night, and be a meanes to direct his enemies where to finde
them.

Page 123

And, in the meane time, hee prepared for his Ambassador to his enemies a
Salvage,[271] that had lived 12. moneths in England, to the end it might adde
reputation to his ambassage. This man hee sends to A Salvage that had
those intruding Narohigansets, to tell them that they lived 12. Moneths in
did very great injury to his Lord, to trench upon his England sent for an
prerogatives: and advised them to put up their pipes, Ambassador.
and begon in time: if they would not, that his Lord would come upon them,
and in his ayd his freinds the English, who were up in armes already to take
his part, and compell them by force to be gone, if they refused to depart by
faire meanes.
This message, comming on the neck of that which {47} doubtlesse the
fearefull Salvage had before related of his escape, and what hee had
observed, caused all those hundred Narohigansets (that meant us no hurt) to
be gone with bagg, and baggage. And my neighboures were gulled by the
subtilety of this Sachem, and lost the best trade of A good opportunity of
beaver that ever they had for the time; and in the end traffick lost by the
found theire error in this kinde of credulity when it subtility of a Sachem.
was too late.

Page 124

Chap. XV.

Of their admirable perfection, in the use of the sences.
This is a thinge not onely observed by mee and diverse of the Salvages of
New England, but, also, by the French men in Nova Francia, and therefore I
am the more incouraged to publish in this Treatice my observation of them
in the use of theire sences: which is a thinge that I should not easily have
bin induced to beleeve, if I my selfe had not bin an eie witnesse of what I
shall relate.
I have observed that the Salvages have the sence of The Salvages have the
seeing so farre beyond any of our Nation, that one sence of seeinge
would allmost beleeve they had intelligence of the better then the
Devill sometimes, when they have tould us of a shipp English.
at Sea, which they have seene {48} soener by one hower, yea, two howers
sayle, then any English man that stood by of purpose to looke out, their
sight is so excellent.
Their eies indeede are black as iett; and that coler is accounted the strongest
for sight. And as they excell us in this particular so much noted, so I thinke
they excell us in all the rest.
This I am sure I have well observed, that in the sence of smelling they have
very great perfection; which is confirmed by the opinion of the French that
are planted about Canada, who have made relation that they are so perfect
in the use of that sence, that they will distinguish between a Spaniard and a
Frenchman by the sent of the hand onely.[272] And I am Salvages that will
perswaded that the Author of this Relation has seene distinguish a
very probable reasons that have induced him to be of Spaniard from a
frenchman by the
that opinion; and I am the more willing to give credit smell of the hand.
thereunto, because I have observed in them so much as
that comes to.
I have seene a Deare passe by me upon a neck of Land, and a Salvage that
has pursued him by the view. I have accompanied him in this pursuite; and
the Salvage, pricking the Deare, comes where hee findes the view of two
deares together, leading several wayes. One, hee was sure, was fresh, but

Page 125

which (by the sence of seeing) hee could not judge; A Deare pursued by
therefore, with his knife, hee diggs up the earth of one; the view of the foote,
and, by smelling, sayes, that was not of the fresh hee was found and
Deare: then diggs hee up the other; and viewing and killed.
smelling to that, concludes it to be the view of the fresh Deare, which hee
had pursued; and thereby followes the chase, and killes that {49} Deare, and
I did eate part of it with him: such is their perfection in these two sences.

Page 126

Chap. XVI.

Of their acknowledgment of the Creation, and immortality of the
Soule.
Although these Salvages are found to be without Religion, Law, and King
(as Sir William Alexander hath well observed,[273]) yet are they not
altogether without the knowledge of God (historically); for they have it
amongst them by tradition that God made one man and one woman, and
bad them live together and get children, kill deare, beasts, birds, fish and
fowle, and what they would at their pleasure; and that their posterity was
full of evill, and made God so angry that hee let in the Sea upon them, and
drowned the greatest part of them, that were naughty men, (the Lord
destroyed so;) and they went to Sanaconquam, who The beleefe of the
feeds upon them (pointing to the Center of the Earth, Salvages.
where they imagine is the habitation of the Devill:) the
other, (which were not destroyed,) increased the world, and when they died
(because they were good) went to the howse of Kytan, pointing to the
setting of the sonne;[274] where they eate all manner of dainties, and never
take paines (as now) to provide it.
Kytan makes provision (they say) and saves them that The Sonne called
laboure; and there they shall live with him forever, {50} Kytan.
voyd of care.[275] And they are perswaded that Kytan
is hee that makes corne growe, trees growe, and all manner of fruits.
And that wee that use the booke of Common prayer doo it to declare to
them, that cannot reade, what Kytan has commaunded us, and that wee doe
pray to him with the helpe of that booke;[276] and doe make so much
accompt of it, that a Salvage (who had lived in my howse before hee had
taken a wife, by whome hee had children) made this request to mee,
(knowing that I allwayes used him with much more respect than others,)
that I would let his sonne be brought up in my howse, A Salvage desired to
that hee might be taught to reade in that booke: which have his sonn brought
request of his I granted; and hee was a very joyfull up to learne the booke
of common prayer.

Page 127

man to thinke that his sonne should thereby (as hee said) become an
Englishman; and then hee would be a good man.
I asked him who was a good man; his answere was, hee that would not lye,
nor steale.
These, with them, are all the capitall crimes that can be imagined; all other
are nothing in respect of those;[277] and hee that is free from these must live
with Kytan for ever, in all manner of pleasure.

Page 128

{51} Chap. XVII.

Of their Annals and funerals.
These people, that have by tradition some touch of the Their custom in
immortality of the soule, have likewise a custome to burryinge.
make some monuments over the place where the corps
is interred: But they put a greate difference betwene persons of noble, and
of ignoble, or obscure, or inferior discent. For, indeed, in the grave of the
more noble they put a planck in the bottom for the corps to be layed upon,
and on each side a plancke, and a plancke upon the top Their manner of
in forme of a chest, before they cover the place with Monuments.
earth. This done, they erect some thing over the grave
in forme of a hearse cloath, as was that of Cheekatawbacks mother, which
the Plimmouth planters defaced because they accounted it an act of
superstition; which did breede a brawle as hath bin before related;[278] for
they hold impious and inhumane to deface the monuments of the dead.
They themselves esteeme of it as piaculum; and have a custome amongst
them to keepe their annals and come at certaine times to lament and bewaile
the losse of their freind; and use to black their faces, which they so weare,
instead of a mourning ornament, for a longer or a At burrials, they black
shorter time according to the dignity of the person: so their faces.
is their annals kept and observed with their
accustomed solemnity. Afterwards they absolutely abandon the place,
because they suppose the sight thereof will but renew their sorrow.[279]
{52} It was a thing very offensive to them, at our first comming into those
parts, to aske of them for any one that had bin dead; but of later times it is
not so offensively taken to renew the memory of any deseased person,
because by our example (which they are apt to followe) it is made more
familiare unto them; and they marvell to see no monuments over our dead,
and therefore thinke no great Sachem is yet come into those parts, or not as
yet deade; because they see the graves all alike.

Page 129

Chap. XVIII.

Of their Custome in burning the Country, and the reason
thereof.
The Salvages are accustomed to set fire of the Country in all places where
they come, and to burne it twize a yeare, viz: at the Spring, and the fall of
the leafe. The reason that mooves them to doe so, is because it would other
wise be so overgrowne with underweedes that it would The Salvages fire the
be all a coppice wood, and the people would not be Country twice a
able in any wise to passe through the Country out of a yeare.
beaten path.
The meanes that they do it with, is with certaine minerall stones, that they
carry about them in baggs made for that purpose of the skinnes of little
beastes, which they convert into good lether, carrying in the same a peece of
touch wood, very excellent {53} for that purpose, of their owne making.[280]
These minerall stones they have from the Piquenteenes, (which is to the
Southward of all the plantations in New England,) by trade and trafficke
with those people.
The burning of the grasse destroyes the underwoods, and so scorcheth the
elder trees that it shrinkes them, and hinders their grouth very much: so that
hee that will looke to finde large trees and good tymber, must not depend
upon the help of a woodden prospect to finde them on the upland ground;
[281]
but must seeke for them, (as I and others have done,) in the lower
grounds, where the grounds are wett, when the Country is fired, by reason
of the snow water that remaines there for a time, untill the Sunne by
continuance of that hath exhaled the vapoures of the earth, and dried up
those places where the fire, (by reason of the moisture,) can have no power
to doe them any hurt: and if he would endevoure to finde out any goodly
Cedars, hee must not seeke for them on the higher grounds, but make his
inquest for them in the vallies, for the Salvages, by this custome of theirs,
have spoiled all the rest: for this custome hath bin continued from the
beginninge.

Page 130

And least their firing of the Country in this manner should be an occasion
of damnifying us, and indaingering our habitations, wee our selves have
used carefully about the same times to observe the winds, and fire the
grounds about our owne habitations; to prevent the Dammage that might
happen by any neglect thereof, if the fire should come neere those howses
in our absence.
{54} For, when the fire is once kindled, it dilates and spreads it selfe as well
against, as with the winde; burning continually night and day, untill a
shower of raine falls to quench it.
And this custome of firing the Country is the meanes to make it passable;
and by that meanes the trees growe here and there as in our parks: and
makes the Country very beautifull and commodious.

Page 131

Chap. XIX.

Of their inclination to Drunkennesse.
Although Drunkennesse be justly termed a vice which the Salvages are
ignorant of, yet the benefit is very great that comes to the planters by the
sale of strong liquor to the Salvages, who are much taken with the delight of
it; for they will pawne their wits, to purchase the acquaintance of it. Yet in
al the commerce that I had with them, I never proffered them any such
thing; nay, I would hardly let any of them have a drame, unles hee were a
Sachem, or a Winnaytue, that is a rich man, or a man of estimation next in
degree to a Sachem or Sagamore. I alwayes tould them it was amongst us
the Sachems drinke. But they say if I come to the Northerne parts of the
Country I shall have no trade, if I will not supply them with lusty liquors: it
is the life of the trade in all those parts: for it so happened that thus a
Salvage desperately killed himselfe; when hee was drunke, a gunne being
charged and the cock up, hee sets the mouth to his brest, and, putting back
the tricker with his foote, shot himselfe dead.[282]

Page 132

Chap. XX. {55}

That the Salvages live a contended life.
A Gentleman and a traveller, that had bin in the parts of New England for a
time, when hee retorned againe, in his discourse of the Country, wondered,
(as hee said,) that the natives of the land lived so poorely in so rich a
Country, like to our Beggers in England. Surely that Gentleman had not
time or leasure whiles hee was there truely to informe himselfe of the state
of that Country, and the happy life the Salvages would leade weare they
once brought to Christianity.
I must confesse they want the use and benefit of The Salvages want the
Navigation, (which is the very sinnus of a flourishing art of navigation.
Commonwealth,) yet are they supplied with all manner
of needefull things for the maintenance of life and lifelyhood. Foode and
rayment are the cheife of all that we make true use of; and of these they
finde no want, but have, and may have, them in a most plentifull manner.
[283]

If our beggers of England should, with so much ease as they, furnish
themselves with foode at all seasons, there would not be so many starved in
the streets, neither would so many gaoles be stuffed, or gallouses furnished
with poore wretches, as I have seene them.
{56} But they of this sort of our owne nation, that are fitt to goe to this
Canaan, are not able to transport themselves; and most of them unwilling to
goe from the good ale tap, which is the very loadstone of the lande by
which our English beggers steere theire Course; it is the Northpole to which
the flowre-de-luce of their compasse points. The more is the pitty that the
Commonalty of oure Land are of such leaden capacities as to neglect so
brave a Country, that doth so plentifully feede maine lusty and a brave, able
men, women and children, that have not the meanes that a Civilized Nation
hath to purchase foode and rayment; which that Country with a little
industry will yeeld a man in a very comfortable measure, without overmuch
carking.

Page 133

I cannot deny but a civilized Nation hath the preheminence of an
uncivilized, by meanes of those instruments that are found to be common
amongst civile people, and the uncivile want the use of, to make themselves
masters of those ornaments that make such a glorious shew, that will give a
man occasion to cry, sic transit gloria Mundi.
Now since it is but foode and rayment that men that live needeth, (though
not all alike,) why should not the Natives of New England be sayd to live
richly, having no want of either? Cloaths are the badge of sinne; and the
more variety of fashions is but the greater abuse of the Creature: the beasts
of the forrest there doe serve to furnish them at any time when they please:
fish and flesh they have in greate abundance, which they both roast and
boyle.
{57} They are indeed not served in dishes of plate with variety of Sauces to
procure appetite; that needs not there. The rarity of the aire, begot by the
medicinable quality of the sweete herbes of the Country, alwayes procures
good stomakes to the inhabitants.
I must needs commend them in this particular, that, though they buy many
commodities of our Nation, yet they keepe but fewe, and those of speciall
use.
They love not to bee cumbered with many utensilles, and although every
proprietor knowes his owne, yet all things, (so long as they will last), are
used in common amongst them: A bisket cake given to one, that one
breakes it equally into so many parts as there be persons in his company,
and distributes it. Platoes Commonwealth is so much practised by these
people.
According to humane reason, guided onely by the light of nature, these
people leades the more happy and freer life, being They leade a happy
voyde of care, which torments the mindes of so many life, being voyd of
Christians: They are not delighted in baubles, but in care.
usefull things.
Their naturall drinke is of the Cristall fountaine, and this they take up in
their hands, by joyning them close together. They take up a great quantity at
a time, and drinke at the wrists. It was the sight of such a feate which made

Page 134

Diogenes hurle away his dishe, and, like one that would have this principall
confirmed, Natura paucis contentat, used a dish no more.
{58} I have observed that they will not be troubled with superfluous
commodities. Such things as they finde they are taught by necessity to make
use of, they will make choise of, and seeke to purchase with industry. So
that, in respect that their life is so voyd of care, and they are so loving also
that they make use of those things they enjoy, (the wife onely excepted,) as
common goods, and are therein so compassionate that, They make use of
rather than one should starve through want, they would ordinary things, one
starve all. Thus doe they passe awaye the time merrily, of anothers as
not regarding our pompe, (which they see dayly before common.
their faces,) but are better content with their owne, which some men
esteeme so meanely of.
They may be rather accompted to live richly, wanting nothing that is
needefull; and to be commended for leading a contented life, the younger
being ruled by the Elder, and the Elder ruled by the Powahs, and the
Powahs are ruled by the Devill;[284] and then you may imagin what good
rule is like to be amongst them.
FINIS.

Page 135

NEW ENGLISH CANAAN, {59}
OR
NEW CANAAN.

The second Booke.

Containing a description of the bewty of the Country with her
naturall indowements, both in the Land and Sea; with the great
Lake of Erocoise.

Chap. I.

The generall Survey of the Country.
N the Moneth of Iune, Anno Salutis 1622, it was my
chaunce to arrive in the parts of New England with 30.
Servants, and provision of all sorts fit for a plantation:
and whiles our howses were building, I did indeavour to
take a survey of the {60} Country: The more I looked,
the more I liked it. And when I had A famous Country.
more seriously considered of the
bewty of the place, with all her faire indowments, I did
not thinke that in all the knowne world it could be paralel’d, for so many
goodly groues of trees, dainty fine round rising hillucks, delicate faire large
plaines, sweete cristall fountaines, and cleare running streames that twine in

Page 136

fine meanders through the meads, making so sweete a Their fountaines are
murmering noise to heare as would even lull the as cleare as Cristall.
sences with delight a sleepe, so pleasantly doe they
glide upon the pebble stones, jetting most jocundly where they doe meete
and hand in hand runne downe to Neptunes Court, to pay the yearely tribute
which they owe to him as soveraigne Lord of all the springs. Contained
within the volume of the Land, [are] Fowles in Greate store of
abundance, Fish in multitude; and [I] discovered, fowles, fish and
besides, Millions of Turtledoves one the greene turtledoves.
boughes, which sate pecking of the full ripe pleasant
grapes that were supported by the lusty trees, whose fruitfull loade did
cause the armes to bend: [among] which here and there dispersed, you
might see Lillies and of the Daphnean-tree: which made the Land to mee
seeme paradice: for in mine eie t’was Natures Masterpeece; Her cheifest
Magazine of all where lives her store: if this Land be not rich, then is the
whole world poore.
What I had resolved on, I have really performed; and I have endeavoured to
use this abstract as an instrument, to bee the meanes to communicate the
knowledge which I have gathered, by my many yeares residence in those
parts, unto my Countrymen: {61} to the end that they may the better perceive
their error, who cannot imagine that there is any Country in the universall
world which may be compared unto our native soyle. I will now discover
unto them a Country whose indowments are by learned men allowed to
stand in a paralell with the Israelites Canaan, which none will deny to be a
land farre more excellent then Old England, in her proper nature.
This I consider I am bound in duety (as becommeth a Christian man) to
performe for the glory of God, in the first place; next, (according to Cicero,)
to acknowledge that, Non nobis solum nati sumus, sed partim patria, partim
parentes, partim amici vindicant.[285]
For which cause I must approove of the indeavoures of my Country men,
that have bin studious to inlarge the territories of his Majesties empire by
planting Colonies in America.
And of all other, I must applaude the judgement of those that have made
choise of this part, (whereof I now treat,) being of all other most absolute,
as I will make it appeare hereafter by way of paralell. Among those that

Page 137

have setled themselvs in new England, some have gone for their conscience
sake, (as they professe,) and I wish that they may plant the Gospel of Iesus
Christ, as becommeth them, sincerely and without satisme or faction,
whatsoever their former or present practises are, which I intend not to
justifie: howsoever, they have deserved (in mine opinion) some
commendationes, in that they have furnished the Country so commodiously
in so short a time; although it hath bin but for their owne profit, yet
posterity will taste the sweetnes of it, and that very sodainly.
{62} And since my taske, in this part of mine abstract, is to intreat of the
naturall indowments of the Country, I will make a breife demonstration of
them in order, severally, according to their severall qualities: and shew you
what they are, and what profitable use may be made of them by industry.

Page 138

Chap. II.

What trees are there and how commodious.[286]
Oakes are there of two sorts, white and redd;[287] 1. Oake.
excellent tymber for the building both of howses and
shipping: and they are found to be a tymber that is more tough then the oak
of England. They are excellent for pipe-staves, and such like vessels; and
pipe-staves at the Canary Ilands are a prime commodity. I have knowne
them there at 35. p. the 1000,[288] and will purchase a fraight of wines there
before any commodity in England, their onely wood being pine, of which
they are enforced also to build shippinge; of oackes there is great
abundance in the parts of New England, and they may have a prime place in
the Catalogue of commodities.
Ashe[289] there is store, and very good for staves, oares 2. Ashe.
or pikes; and may have a place in the same Catalogue.
Elme: of this sort of trees there are some; but there 3. Elme.
hath not as yet bin found any quantity to speake of.
[290]
{63} Beech there is of two sorts, redd and white; 4. Beech.
very excellent for trenchers or chaires, and also for
oares; and may be accompted for a commodity.
Wallnutt: of this sorte of wood there is infinite store, 5. Walnutt.
and there are 4 sorts:[291] it is an excellent wood, for
many uses approoved; the younger trees are imployed for hoopes, and are
the best for that imployement of all other stuffe whatsoever. The Nutts serve
when they fall to feede our swine, which make them the delicatest bacon of
all other foode: and is therein a cheife commodity.
Chestnutt: of this sorte there is very greate plenty, the 6. Chestnuts.
tymber whereof is excellent for building; and is a very
good commodity, especially in respect of the fruit, both for man and beast.
Pine: of this sorte there is infinite store in some parts 7. Pine.
of the Country.[292] I have travelled 10. miles together

Page 139

where is little or no other wood growing.[293] And of these may be made
rosin, pitch and tarre, which are such usefull commodities that if wee had
them not from other Countries in Amity with England, our Navigation
would decline. Then how great the commodity of it will be to our Nation, to
have it of our owne, let any man judge.
Cedar:[294] of this sorte there is abundaunce; and this 8. Cedar.
wood was such as Salomon used for the building of
that glorious Temple at Hierusalem; and there are of these Cedars, firre
trees and other materialls necessary for the building of many faire Temples,
[295]
if there were any Salomons to be at the Cost of them: and if any man
be desirous to finde out in what part of the {64} Country the best Cedars are,
he must get into the bottom grounds, and in vallies that are wet at the spring
of the yeare, where the moisture preserves them from the fire in spring time,
and not in a woodden prospect.[296] This wood cutts red, and is good for
bedsteads, tables and chests; and may be placed in the Catalogue of
Commodities.
Cypres:[297] of this there is great plenty; and vulgarly 9. Cypres.
this tree hath bin taken for another sort of Cedar; but
workemen put a difference betweene this Cypres, and the Cedar, especially
in the colour; for this is white and that redd white: and likewise in the
finenes of the leafe and the smoothnes of the barque. This wood is also
sweeter then Cedar, and, (as it is in Garrets[298] herball,) a more bewtifull
tree; it is of all other, to my minde, most bewtifull, and cannot be denied to
passe for a commodity.
Spruce[299]: of these there are infinite store, especially 10. Spruce.
in the Northerne parts of the Country; and they have
bin approoved by workemen in England to be more tough then those that
they have out of the east country: from whence wee have them for masts
and yards of shippes.
The Spruce of this country are found to be 3. and 4. The Spruce of this
fadum about: and are reputed able, single, to make Country are found to
masts for the biggest ship that sayles on the maine be 3. & 4. fadum
Ocean, without peesing; which is more than the East aboute.
country can afford.[300] And seeing that Navigation is the very sinneus of a

Page 140

flourishing Commonwealth, it is fitting to allow the Spruce tree a principall
place in the Catalogue of commodities.
{65} Alder: of this sorte there is plenty by rivers sides,
11. Alder.
good for turners.
Birch: of this there is plenty in divers parts of the 12. Birch.
Country. Of the barck of these the Salvages of the
Northerne parts make them delicate Canowes, so light that two men will
transport one of them over Land whither[301] they list; and yet one of them
will transporte tenne or twelffe Salvages by water at a time.
Mayple:[302] of those trees there is greate abundance; 13. Maple.
and these are very excellent for bowles. The Indians
use of it to that purpose; and is to be accompted a good commodity.
Elderne:[303] there is plenty in that Country; of this the 14. Elderne.
Salvages make their Arrowes, and it hath no strong
unsavery sent like our Eldern in England.
Hawthorne: of this there is two sorts, one of which 15. Hawthorne.
beares a well tasting berry as bigg as ones thumbe, and
lookes like little Queene apples.
Vines: of this kinde of trees there are that beare grapes 16. Vines.
of three colours: that is to say, white, black and red.
[304]

The Country is so apt for vines, that, but for the fire at the spring of the
yeare, the vines would so over spreade the land that one should not be able
to passe for them;[305] the fruit is as bigg, of some, as a musket bullet, and is
excellent in taste.
Plumtrees:[306] of this kinde there are many; some that 17. Plummes.
beare fruit as bigg as our ordinary bullis: others there
be that doe beare fruite much bigger than peare plummes; their colour redd,
and their stones flat; very delitious in taste.
{66} Cheritrees there are abundance; but the fruit is as 18. Cherries.
small as our sloes; but if any of them were replanted

Page 141

and grafted, in an orchard, they would soone be raised by meanes of such;
and the like fruits.
There is greate abundance of Muske Roses in divers 19. Roses.
places: the water distilled excelleth our Rosewater of
England.
There is abundance of Sassafras[307] and Sarsaperilla, 20. Sassafras and 21.
[308]
growing in divers places of the land; whose budds Sarsaperilla.
at the spring doe perfume the aire.
Other trees there are not greatly materiall to be recited in this abstract, as
goose berries, rasberies, and other beries.
There is Hempe[309] that naturally groweth, finer then our Hempe of
England.

Page 142

Chap. III.

Potthearbes and other herbes for Sallets.
The Country there naturally affordeth very good pot-herbes and sallet
herbes, and those of a more maskuline vertue then any Potmarioram, Tyme,
of the same species in England; as Potmarioram, Alexander, Angellica,
Tyme, Alexander, Angellica, Pursland, Violets, and Pursland, Violets, and
Anniseeds, in very great abundance: and for the pott I Anniseeds.
gathered in summer, dried and crumbled into a bagg to preserve for winter
store.
{67} Hunnisuckles, balme, and divers other good Hunnisuckles and
herbes are there, that grow without the industry of Balme.
man, that are used when occasion serveth very
commodiously.[310]

Page 143

Chap. IV.

Of Birds, and fethered fowles.[311]
Now that I have breifly shewed the Commodity of the trees, herbes, and
fruits, I will shew you a description of the fowles of the aire; as most proper
in ordinary course.
And first of the Swanne,[312] because shee is the Swannes.
biggest of all the fowles of that Country. There are of
them in Merrimack River, and in other parts of the country, greate store at
the seasons of the yeare.
The flesh is not much desired of the inhabitants, but the skinnes may be
accompted a commodity fitt for divers uses, both for fethers and quiles.
There are Geese of three sorts, vize: brant Geese[313] Geese, pide, white,
which are pide, and white Geese[314] which are bigger, and gray.
and gray Geese[315] which are as bigg and bigger then
the tame Geese of England, with black legges, black bills, heads and necks
black; the flesh farre more excellent then the Geese of England, wild or
tame; yet the purity of the aire is such that the biggest is accompted but an
indifferent meale for a couple of men. There is of them great abundance. I
have had often 1000. before the mouth of my gunne. I never saw any in {68}
England, for my part, so fatt as I have killed there in those parts; the fethers
of them makes a bedd softer then any down bed that I have lyen on, and is
there a very good commodity; the fethers of the Geese, Fethers pay for
that I have killed in a short time, have paid for all the powther and shott.
powther and shott I have spent in a yeare, and I have
fed my doggs with as fatt Geese there as I have euer fed upon my selfe in
England.
Ducks there are of three kindes, pide Ducks, gray Ducks pide, gray, &
Ducks, and black Ducks in greate abundance: the most black.
about my habitation were black Ducks:[316] and it was
a noted Custome at my howse, to have every mans Duck upon a trencher;

Page 144

and then you will thinke a man was not hardly used: they are bigger
boddied then the tame Ducks of England: very fatt and dainty flesh.
The common doggs fees were the gibletts, unlesse they were boyled now
and than for to make broath.
Teales there are of two sorts, greene winged, and blew Teales, greene and
winged:[317] but a dainty bird. I have bin much blew.
delighted with a rost of these for a second course. I had
plenty in the rivers and ponds about my howse.
Widggens[318] there are, and abundance of other water Widggens.
foule, some such as I have seene, and [some] such as I
have not seene else where before I came into those parts, which are little
regarded.
Simpes[319] there are like our Simpes in all respects, Simpes.
with very litle difference. I have shot at them onely to
see what difference I could finde betweene them and those of my native
Country, and more I did not regard them.
{69} Sanderlings[320] are a dainty bird, more full Sanderlings.
boddied than a Snipe; and I was much delighted to
feede on them because they were fatt and easie to come by, because I went
but a stepp or to for them: and I have killed betweene foure and five dozen
at a shoot, which would loade me home.
Their foode is at ebbing water on the sands, of small seeds that grows on
weeds there, and are very good pastime in August.
Cranes[321] there are greate store, that ever more came Cranes.
there at S. Davids day, and not before: that day they
never would misse.
These sometimes eate our corne, and doe pay for their presumption well
enough; and serveth there in powther, with turnips, to supply the place of
powthered beefe, and is a goodly bird in a dishe, and no discommodity.
Turkies[322] there are, which divers times in great Turkies.
flocks have sallied by our doores; and then a gunne,
being commonly in a redinesse, salutes them with such a courtesie, as

Page 145

makes them take a turne in the Cooke roome. They daunce by the doore so
well.
Of these there hath bin killed that have weighed forty eight pound a peece.
[323]

They are by mainy degrees sweeter then the tame Turkies of England, feede
them how you can.
I had a Salvage who hath taken out his boy in a morning, and they have
brought home their loades about noone.
{70} I have asked them what number they found in the woods, who have
[324]
answered Neent Metawna, which is a thosand that day; the plenty of
them is such in those parts. They are easily killed at rooste, because, the one
being killed, the other sit fast neverthelesse; and this is no bad commodity.
There are a kinde of fowles which are commonly Pheisants.
called Pheisants,[325] but whether they be pheysants or
no, I will not take upon mee to determine. They are in forme like our
pheisant henne of England. Both the male and the female are alike; but they
are rough footed, and have stareing fethers about the head and neck; the
body is as bigg as the pheysant henne of England; and are excellent white
flesh, and delicate white meate, yet we seldome bestowe a shoote at them.
Partridges[326] there are, much like our Partridges of Partridges bigger in
England; they are of the same plumes, but bigger in body as those of
body. They have not the signe of the horseshoe on the England.
brest, as the Partridges of England; nor are they
coloured about the heads as those are. They sit on the trees, for I have seene
40. in one tree at a time: yet at night they fall on the ground, and sit untill
morning so together; and are dainty flesh.
There are quailes[327] also, but bigger then the quailes Quailes bigger in
in England. They take trees also: for I have numbered body as those in
60. upon a tree at a time. The cocks doe call at the time England.
of the yeare, but with a different note from the cock
quailes of England.
The Larkes[328] there are like our Larkes of England in The Larkes sing not.
all respects: sauing that they do not use to sing at all.

Page 146

{71} There are Owles of divers kindes: but I did never
Owles.
heare any of them whop as ours doe.
There are Crowes,[329] kights and rooks that doe differ The Crowes smell &
in some respects from those of England. The Crowes, tast of Muske in
which I have much admired what should be the cause, summer,
winter.
but not in

both smell and taste of Muske in summer, but not in
winter.
There are Hawkes in New England of 5. sorts;[330] and Hawkes of five sorts.
these of all other fether fowles I must not omitt to
speake of, nor neede I to make any Apology for my selfe concerning any
trespasse that I am like to make upon my judgement, concerning the nature
of them, having bin bred in so genious a way that I had the common use of
them in England: and at my first arrivall in those parts A Lannaret.
practised to take a Lannaret,[331] which I reclaimed,
trained and made flying in a fortnight, the same being a passenger at
Michuelmas. I found that these are most excellent Mettell, rank winged,
well conditioned, and not tickleish footed; and, having whoods, bels, luers,
and all things fitting, was desirous to make experiment of that kinde of
Hawke before any other.
And I am perswaded that Nature hath ordained them to be of a farre better
kinde then any that have bin used in England.[332] They have neither
dorre[333] nor worm to feed upon, (as in other parts of the world,) the
Country affording none; the use whereof in other parts makes the Lannars
there more bussardly[334] then they be in New England.
There are likewise Fawcons[335] and tassell gentles, Fawcons.
[336]
admirable well shaped birds; and they will tower
up {72} when they purpose to pray, and, on a sodaine when they esspie their
game, they will make such a cancellere that one would admire to behold
them. Some there are more black then any that have bin used in England.
The Tassell gent, (but of the least size,[337]) is an ornament for a person of
estimation among the Indians to weare in the knot of his lock, with the
traine upright, the body dried and stretched out. They take a great pride in
the wearing of such an ornament, and give to one of us, that shall kill them

Page 147

one for that purpose, so much beaver as is worth three pounds sterling, very
willingly.
These doe us but little trespas, because they pray on such birds as are by the
Sea side, and not on our Chickens. Goshawkes there are, and Tassels.
The Tassels are short trussed bussards;[338] but the Goshawkes well
Goshawkes[339] are well shaped, but they are small; shaped.
some of white male, and some redd male, I have seene
one with 8. barres in the traine. These fall on our bigger poultry: the lesser
chicken, I thinke they scorne to make their pray of; for commonly the
Cocke goes to wrack. Of these I have seene many; and if they come to
trespasse me, I lay the law to them with the gunne, and take them dammage
fesant.
There are very many Marlins;[340] some very small, Marlins small and
and some so large as is the Barbary Tassell. greate.

I have often beheld these pretty birds, how they have scoured after the black
bird, which is a small sized Choffe[341] that eateth the Indian maisze.
Sparhawkes[342] there are also, the fairest and {73} best Sparhawkes.
shaped birds that I have ever beheld of that kinde those
that are litle, no use is made of any of them, neither are they regarded. I
onely tried conclusions with a Lannaret at first comming; and, when I found
what was in that bird, I turned him going; but, for so much as I have
observed of those birds, they may be a fitt present for a prince, and for
goodnesse too be preferred before the Barbary, or any other used in
Christendome; and especially the Lannars and Lannarets.
There is a curious bird to see to, called a hunning bird, A Hunning bird, is as
[343]
no bigger then a great Beetle; that out of question small as a Beetle. His
lives upon the Bee, which hee eateth and catcheth bill as sharp as a
needle point, and his
amongst Flowers: For it is his Custome to frequent fethers like silke.
those places. Flowers hee cannot feed upon by reason
of his sharp bill, which is like the poynt of a Spannish needle, but shorte.
His fethers have a glosse like silke, and, as hee stirres, they shew to be of a
chaingable coloure: and has bin, and is, admired for shape, coloure and size.

Page 148

Chap. V.

Of the Beasts of the forrest.[344]
Now that I have made a rehearsall of the birds and fethered Fowles, which
participate most of aire, I will give you a description of the beasts; and shew
you what beasts are bred in those parts, and what my experience hath
gathered by observation of {74} their kinde and nature. I begin with the most
usefull and most beneficiall beast which is bredd in those parts, which is the
Deare.
There are in this Country three kindes of Deare, of Deare of 3. kindes.
which there are greate plenty, and those are very
usefull.
First, therefore, I will speake of the Elke, which the Mose or red deare.
Salvages call a Mose:[345] it is a very large Deare, with
a very faire head, and a broade palme, like the palme of a fallow Deares
horne, but much bigger, and is 6. footewide betweene the tipps, which grow
curbing downwards: Hee is of the bignesse of a great horse.
There have bin of them seene that has bin 18. Mose or deare greater
handfulls highe: hee hath a bunch of haire under his than a horse, the
jawes: hee is not swifte, but stronge and large in body, height of them 18.
hand fulles.
and longe legged; in somuch that hee doth use to
kneele, when hee feedeth on grasse.
Hee bringeth forth three faunes, or younge ones, at a They bringe forth
time; and, being made tame, would be good for three faunes at one
draught, and more usefull (by reason of their strength) time.
then the Elke of Raushea.[346] These are found very
frequent in the northerne parts of New England: their flesh is very good
foode, and much better then our redd Deare of England.
Their hids are by the Salvages converted into very They make good
good lether, and dressed as white as milke. lether of the hides of
Deare.
Of this lether the Salvages make the best shooes; and
use to barter away the skinnes to other Salvages that have none of that

Page 149

kinde of bests in the parts where they live. Very good buffe may be made of
the {75} hids. I have seene a hide as large as any horse hide that can be
found. There is such abundance of them that the Salvages, at hunting time,
have killed of them so many, that they have bestowed six or seaven at a
time upon one English man whome they have borne affection to.
There is a second sort of Deare[347] (lesse then the redd The midling Deare or
Deare of England, but much bigger then the English fallow Deare.
fallow Deare) swift of foote, but of a more darke
coloure; with some griseld heares, when his coate is full growne in the
summer season; his hornes grow curving, with a croked beame, resembling
our redd Deare, not with a palme like the fallow Deare.
These bringe 3. fawnes at a time,[348] spotted like our fallow Deares fawnes;
the Salvages say, foure; I speake of what I know to be true, for I have killed
in February a doe with three fawnes in her belly, all heared, and ready to
fall; for these Deare fall their fawnes 2. moneths sooner then the fallow
Deare of England. There is such abundance of them that an hundred have
bin found at the spring of the yeare, within the compasse of a mile.
The Salvages take these in trappes made of their Trappes to catch the
naturall Hempe, which they place in the earth where Deare.
they fell a tree for browse; and when hee rounds the
tree for the browse, if hee tread on the trapp hee is horsed up by the legg, by
meanes of a pole that starts up and catcheth him.[349]
Their hides the Saluages use for cloathing, and will give for one hide killed
in season, 2. 3. or 4. beaver skinnes, which will yeild pounds a peece in that
Coun{76}try: so much is the Deares hide prised with them above the beaver.
I have made good merchandize of these. The flesh is farre sweeter then the
venison of England: and hee feedeth fatt and leane together, as a swine or
mutton, where as our Deare of England feede fatt on the out side: they doe
not croake at rutting time, nor spendle shafte, nor is their flesh discoloured
at rutting. Hee, that will impale ground fitting, may be brought once in the
yeare where with bats and men hee may take so many to put into that parke,
as the hides will pay the chardge of impaleinge. If all these things be well
considered, the Deare, as well as the Mose, may have a principall place in
the catalogue of commodities.

Page 150

I for my part may be bould to tell you, that my howse The Humbles was the
was not without the flesh of this sort of Deare winter doggs fee.
nor summer: the humbles was ever my dogges fee,
which by the wesell[350] was hanged on the barre in the chimney, for his diet
only: for hee has brought to my stand a brace in a morning, one after the
other before sunne rising, which I have killed.
There is likewise a third sorte of deare,[351] lesse then Roe bucks or Rayne
the other, (which are a kinde of rayne deare,) to the Deare.
southward of all the English plantations: they are
excellent good flesh. And these also bring three fawnes at a time; and in this
particular the Deare of those parts excell all the knowne Deare of the whole
world.
On all these the Wolfes doe pray continually. The best Wolfes pray upon
meanes they have to escape the wolfes is by swimming Deare.
to Islands,[352] or necks of land, whereby {77} they
escape: for the wolfe will not presume to follow them untill they see them
over a river; then, being landed, (they wayting on the shore,) undertake the
water, and so follow with fresh suite.
The next in mine opinion fit to be spoaken of, is the Beaver.
Beaver;[353] which is a Beast ordained for land and
water both, and hath fore feete like a cunny, her hinder feete like a goese,
mouthed like a cunny, but short eared like a Serat. [He feeds on] fishe in
summer, and wood in winter; which hee conveyes to his howse built on the
water, wherein hee sitts with his tayle hanging in the water, which else
would over heate and rot off.
Hee cuts the bodies of trees downe with his fore-teeth, The Beavers cut
which are so long as a boares tuskes, and with the help downe trees, with his
of other beavers, (which hold by each others tayles like fore teeth.
a teeme of horses, the hindmost with the logg on his
shoulder stayed by one of his fore feete against his head,) they draw the
logg to the habitation appoynted, placing the loggs in a square; and so, by
pyling one uppon another, they build up a howse, which with boghes is
covered very strongly, and placed in some pond, to which they make a
damme of brush wood, like a hedge, so stronge that I have gone on the top
of it crosse the current of that pond. The flesh of this beast is excellent

Page 151

foode. The fleece is a very choise furre, which, (before the Salvages had
commerce with Christians,) they burned of the tayle: this beast is of a
masculine vertue for the advancement of Priapus,[354] and is preserved for a
dish for the Sachems, or Sagamores; who are the princes of the people, but
not Kings, (as is fondly supposed.)
{78} The skinnes are the best marchantable commodity Beaver at 10. shil. a
that can be found, to cause ready money to be brought pound.
into the land, now that they are raised to 10. shillings a
pound.[355]
A servant of mine in 5. yeares was thought to have a In 5 yeares one man
1000. p. in ready gold gotten by beaver when hee gott together 1000 p.
dyed;[356] whatsoever became of it. And this beast may in good gold.
challenge preheminence in the Catalogue.
The Otter[357] of those parts, in winter season, hath a The Otter in winter
furre so black as jett; and is a furre of very highe price: hath a furre as black
a good black skinne is worth 3. or 4. Angels of gold. as Iett.
The Flesh is eaten by the Salvages: but how good it is I
cannot shew, because it is not eaten by our Nation. Yet is this a beast that
ought to be placed in the number amongst the Commodities of the Country.
The Luseran, or Luseret,[358] is a beast like a Catt, but The Luseran as bigg
so bigg as a great hound: with a tayle shorter then a as a hound.
Catt. His clawes are like a Catts. Hee will make a pray
of the Deare. His Flesh is dainty meat, like a lambe: his hide is a choise
furre, and accompted a good commodity.
The Martin[359] is a beast about the bignes of a Foxe. The Martin is about
His furre is chestnutt coloure: and of those there are the bignesse of a Fox.
greate store in the Northerne parts of the Country, and
is a good commodity.
The Racowne[360] is a beast as bigg, full out, as a Racowne.
Foxe, with a Bushtayle. His Flesh excellent foode: his
oyle precious for the Syattica:[361] his furre course, but the skinnes serve the
Salvages for coats, and is with those people of more esteeme then a coate of
beaver, {79} because of the tayles that (hanging round in their order) doe

Page 152

adorne the garment, and is therefore so much esteemed of them. His fore
feete are like the feete of an ape; and by the print thereof, in the time of
snow, he is followed to his hole, which is commonly in a hollow tree; from
whence hee is fiered out, and so taken.
The Foxes are of two coloures; the one redd, the other The Foxes red and
gray:[362] these feede on fish, and are good furre:[363] gray.
they doe not stinke, as the Foxes of England, but their
condition for their pray is as the Foxes of England.
The Wolfes are of divers coloures;[364] some sandy The Wolfes of diverse
coloured, some griselled, and some black: their foode coloures.
is fish, which they catch when they passe up the rivers
into the ponds to spawne, at the spring time. The Deare are also their pray,
and at summer, when they have whelpes, the bitch will fetch a puppy dogg
from our dores to feede their whelpes with. They are fearefull Curres, and
will runne away from a man, (that meeteth them by chaunce at a banke
end,) as fast as any fearefull dogge.[365] These pray upon the Deare very
much. The skinnes are used by the Salvages, especially the skinne of the
black wolfe, which is esteemed a present for a prince there.
When there ariseth any difference betweene prince and The skin of a black
prince, the prince that desires to be reconciled to his wolfe a present for a
neighboring prince does endeavour to purchase it by prince.
sending him a black wolfes skinne for a present, and
the acceptance of such a present is an assurance of reconciliation betweene
them; and the {80} Salvages will willingly give 40. beaver skinnes for the
purchase of one of these black Wolfes skinnes:[366] and allthough the beast
himselfe be a discommodity, which other Countries of Christendome are
subject unto, yet is the skinne of the black wolfe worthy the title of a
commodity, in that respect that hath bin declared.
If I should not speake something of the beare,[367] I The Beares afraid of a
might happily leave a scruple in the mindes of some man.
effeminate persone who conceaved of more dainger in
them then there is cause. Therefore, to incourage them against all Feare and
Fortifie their mindes against needles danger, I will relate what experience
hath taught mee concerning them: they are beasts that doe no harme in

Page 153

those parts; they feede upon Hurtleburies, Nuts and Fish, especially shell-
fish.
The Beare is a tyrant at a Lobster, and at low water will downe to the Rocks
and groape after them with great diligence.
Hee will runne away from a man as fast as a litle The Salvages seeing a
dogge. If a couple of Salvages chaunce to espie him at beare chase him like a
his banquet, his running away will not serve his turne, dogg and kill him.
for they will coate him, and chase him betweene them
home to theire howses, where they kill him, to save a laboure in carrying
him farre. His Flesh is esteemed venison, and of a better taste then beefe.
[368]

His hide is used by the Salvages for garments, and is more commodious
then discommodious; and may passe, (with some allowance,) with the rest.
The Muskewashe[369] is a beast that frequenteth the Muskewashe.
ponds. What hee eats I cannot finde. Hee is {81} but a
small beast, lesse then a Cunny, and is indeede in those parts no other then a
water Ratte; for I have seene the suckers of them digged out of a banke, and
at that age they neither differed in shape, coloure, nor size, from one of our
greate Ratts. When hee is ould, hee is of the Beavers coloure; and hath
passed in waite with our Chapmen for Beaver.
The Male of them have stones, which the Salvages, in uncaseing of them,
leave to the skinne, which is a most delicate perfume, and may compare
with any perfume that I know for goodnesse: Then may not this be excluded
the Catalogue.
This Country, in the North parts thereof, hath many Porcupines.
Porcupines,[370] but I doe not finde the beast any way
usefull or hurtfull.
There are in those Northerne parts many Hedgehoggs, Hedghoggs.
of the like nature to our English Hedghoggs.[371]
Here are greate store of Conyes[372] in those parts, of Conyes of severall
divers coloures; some white, some black, and some sorts.
gray. Those towards the Southerne parts are very
small, but those to the North are as bigg as the English Cony: their eares are

Page 154

very short. For meate the small rabbit is as good as any that I have eaten of
else where.
There are Squirils of three sorts,[373] very different in Squirils of three sorts.
shape and condition; one[374] is gray, and hee is as bigg
as the lesser Cony, and keepeth the woods, feeding upon nutts.
Another is red, and hee haunts our howses and will rob us of our Corne; but
the Catt many times payes him the price of his presumption.
{82} The third is a little flying Squirill, with batlike A Flying Squirill.
winges, which hee spreads when hee jumpes from tree
to tree, and does no harme.
Now because I am upon a treaty of the beasts, I will Snakes.
place this creature, the snake, amongst the beasts,
having my warrant from the holy Bible; who, (though his posture in his
passage be so different from all other, being of a more subtile and aidry
nature, that hee can make his way without feete, and lifte himselfe above
the superficies of the earth, as hee glids along,) yet may hee not bee ranked
with any but the beasts, notwithstanding hee frequents the water, as well as
the land.
There are of Snakes divers and of severall kindes, as be with us in England;
but that Country hath not so many as in England have bin knowne.[375]
The generall Salvage name of them is Ascowke.[376]
There is one creeping beast or longe creeple, (as the The rattle Snakes.
name is in Devonshire,) that hath a rattle at his tayle
that does discover his age; for so many yeares as hee hath lived, so many
joynts are in that rattle, which soundeth (when it is in motion,) like pease in
a bladder; and this beast is called a rattle Snake; but the Salvages give him
the name of Sesick,[377] which some take to be the Adder; and it may well
be so, for the Salvages are significiant in their denomination of any thing,
and [it] is no lesse hurtfull than the Adder of England, nor no more. I have
had my dogge venomed with troubling one of these, and so swelled that I
had thought it would have bin his death: but with one Saucer of Salet oyle
powred downe his throate he {83} has recovered, and the swelling asswaged
by the next day. The like experiment hath bin made upon a boy that hath by

Page 155

chaunce troad upon one of these, and the boy never the worse. Therefore it
is simplicity in any one that shall tell a bugbeare tale of horrible, or terrible
Serpents, that are in that land.[378]
Mise there are good store, and my Lady Woodbees Mise.
black gray-malkin may have pastime enough there: but
for Rats, the Country by Nature is troubled with none.[379]
Lyons there are none in New England:[380] it is Lyons alwaies in hot
contrary to the Nature of the beast to frequent places Clymats, not in cold.
accustomed to snow; being like the Catt, that will
hazard the burning of her tayle rather than abide from the fire.

Page 156

Chap. VI.

Of Stones and Minerals.[381]
Now, (for as much as I have in a breife abstract shewed you the Creatures
whose specificall Natures doe simpathise with the elements of fire and
aire,) I will come to speake of the Creatures that participate of earth more
then the other two, which is stones.
And first of the Marble for building; whereof there is Marble.
much in those parts, in so much there is one bay in the
land that beareth the name of Marble harber, because of the plenty of
Marble there:[382] and these {84} are usefull for building of Sumpteous
Pallaces.
And because no good building can be made Limestone.
permanent, or durable, without Lime, I will let you
understand that there is good Limestone neere to the river of Monatoquinte,
[383]
at Uttaquatock,[384] to my knowledge; and we hope other places too,
(that I have not taken so much notice of,) may have the like, or better: and
those stones are very convenient for building.
Chalke stones there are neere Squantos Chappell,[385] Chalk.
shewed me by a Salvage.
There is abundance of excellent Slate[386] in divers Slate.
places of the Country; and the best that ever I beheld
for covering of howses: and the inhabitants have made good use of these
materials for building.
There is a very usefull Stone in the Land, and as yet Whetstones.
there is found out but one place where they may be
had, in the whole Country: Ould Woodman, (that was choaked at
Plimmouth after hee had played the unhappy Markes man when hee was
pursued by a carelesse fellow that was new come into the Land,) they say
laboured to get a patent of it to himselfe. Hee was beloved of many, and had
many sonnes that had a minde to engrosse that commodity. And I cannot
spie any mention made of it in the woodden prospect.[387]

Page 157

Therefore I begin to suspect his aime, that it was for himselfe; and therefore
will I not discover it: it is the Stone so much commended by Ovid, because
love delighteth to make his habitation in a building of those materials,
where hee advises those that seeke for love to doe it, Duris in Cotibus illum.
[388]

This stone the Salvages doe call Cos;[389] {85} and of these, (on the North
end of Richmond Iland,) are store, and those are very excellent good for
edg’d tooles.[390] I envy not his happinesse. I have bin there:[391] viewed the
place: liked the commodity: but will not plant so Northerly for that, nor any
other commodity that is there to be had.
There are Loadestones[392] also in the Northerne parts Loadstones.
of the land: and those which were found are very good,
and are a commodity worth the noteing.
Iron stones[393] there are abundance: and severall sorts Ironstones.
of them knowne.
Lead ore[394] is there likewise, and hath bin found by Lead.
the breaking of the earth, which the Frost hath made
mellow.
Black Leade[395] I have likewise found very good, Blacklead.
which the Salvages use to paint their faces with.
Red Leade[396] is there likewise in great abundance. Read lead.

There is very excellent Boll Armoniack.[397] Boll.
[398]
There is most excellent Vermilion. All these things
Vermilion.
the Salvages make some litle use of, and doe finde
them on the circumference of the Earth.
Brimstone[399] mines there are likewise. Brimstone.

Mines of Tinne[400] are likewise knowne to be in those Tinne.
parts: which will in short time be made use of: and this
cannot be accompted a meane commodity.
Copper mines[401] are there found likewise, that will Copper.
enrich the Inhabitants. But untill theire younge Cattell

Page 158

be growne hardy labourers in the yoake, that the Plough and the Wheate
may be seene more plentifully, it is a worke must be forborne.
[402]
{86} They say there is a Silver, and a gold mine Silver.
[403]
found by Captaine Littleworth: if hee get a patent
of it to himselfe hee will surely change his name.

Page 159

Chap. VII.

Of the Fishes, and what commodity they proove.[404]
Among Fishes, first I will begin with the Codd, because it is the most
commodious of all fish, as may appeare by the use which is made of them
in forraigne parts.
The Codd fishing is much used in America, (whereof Codd.
New England is a part,) in so much as 300. Sayle of
shipps, from divers parts, have used to be imployed yearely in that trade.
I have seene in one Harboure,[405] next Richmond 15. Shipps at one time
Iland, 15. Sayle of shipps at one time, that have taken for Codd.
in them driyed Codds for Spaine and the Straights, and
it has bin found that the Saylers have made 15. 18. 20. 22. p. share for a
common man.
The Coast aboundeth with such multitudes of Codd[406] that the inhabitants
of New England doe dunge their grounds with Codd; and it is a commodity
better than the golden mines of the Spanish Indies; for without dried Codd
the Spaniard, Portingal and Italian would not be able to vittel of a shipp for
the Sea; and I am sure at the Canaries it is the principall commodity: which
place lyeth neere New Eng{87}land, very convenient for the vending of this
commodity, one hundred of these being at the price of 300. of New found
land Codds: greate store of traine oyle[407] is mayd of Oyle mayd of the
the livers of the Codd, and is a commodity that without livers of the Codd.
question will enrich the inhabitants of New England
quicly; and is therefore a principall commodity.
The Basse[408] is an excellent Fish, both fresh and A 100 Basse sould for
Salte; one hundred whereof salted, (at a market,) have 5. p.
yeilded 5. p. They are so large, the head of one will
give a good eater a dinner; and for daintinesse of diet they excell the Mary-
bones of Beefe. There are such multitudes, that I have seene stopped into
the river close adjoyning to my howse, with a sand at one tide, so many as
will loade a ship of a 100. Tonnes.

Page 160

Other places have greater quantities, in so much as wagers have bin layed
that one should not throw a stone in the water but that hee should hit a fish.
I my selfe, at the turning of the tyde, have seene such multitudes passe out
of a pound, that it seemed to mee that one might goe over their backs
drishod.
These follow the bayte up the rivers, and sometimes are followed for bayte
and chased into the bayes, and shallow waters, by the grand pise:[409] and
these may have also a prime place in the Catalogue of Commodities.
The Mackarels are the baite for the Basse, and these Mackarell are baite
have bin chased into the shallow waters where so for Basse.
many thousands have shott themselves a shore with the
surfe of the Sea, that whole hogges-heads have bin taken up on the Sands;
and for length, they excell {88} any of other parts: they have bin measured
18. and 19. inches in length and seaven in breadth: and are taken with a
drayle,[410] (as boats use to passe to and froe at Sea on businesse,) in very
greate quantities all alonge the Coaste.
The Fish is good, salted, for store against the winter, as well as fresh; and to
be accounted a good Commodity.
This Sturgeon in England is regalis piscis;[411] every Sturgeon.
man in New England may catch what hee will: there
are multitudes of them, and they are much fatter then those that are brought
into England from other parts, in so much as by reason of their fatnesse they
doe not looke white, but yellow, which made a Cooke presume they were
not so good as them of Roushea: silly fellow that could not understand that
it is the nature of fish salted, or pickelled, the fatter the yellower being best
to preserve.[412]
For the taste, I have warrant of Ladies of worth, with choise pallats for the
commendations, who liked the taste so well that they esteemed it beyond
the Sturgeon of other parts, and sayd they were deceaved in the lookes:
therefore let the Sturgeon passe for a Commodity.
Of Salmons there is greate abundance: and these may Salmon.
be allowed for a Commodity, and placed in the
Catallogue.

Page 161

Of Herrings there is greate store, fat and faire: and, (to Herrings.
my minde,) as good as any I have seene; and these
may be preserved, and made a good commodity at the Canaries.
{89} Of Eeles there is abundance, both in the Salt-
Great plenty of Eeles.
waters and in the fresh: and the fresh water Eele there,
(if I may take the judgement of a London Fishmonger,) is the best that hee
hath found in his life time. I have with 2.[413] eele potts found my
howsehold, (being nine persons, besides doggs,) with them, taking them
every tide, (for 4. moneths space,) and preserving of them for Winter store:
[414]
and these may proove a good commodity.
Of Smelts there is such abundance that the Salvages Smelts.
doe take them up in the rivers with baskets, like sives.
There is a Fish, (by some called shadds, by some Shadds or Allizes
allizes,)[415] that at the spring of the yeare passe up the taken to dunge
rivers to spaune in the ponds; and are taken in such ground.
multitudes in every river, that hath a pond at the end,
that the Inhabitants doung their ground with them. You may see in one
towneship a hundred acres together set with these Fish, every acre taking
1000. of them: and an acre thus dressed will produce and yeald so much
corne as 3. acres without fish: and, least any Virginea man would inferre
hereupon that the ground of New England is barren, because they use no
fish in setting their corne, I desire them to be remembred the cause is
plaine, in Virginea they have it not to sett. But this practise is onely for the
Indian Maize, (which must be set by hands,) not for English graine: and this
is therefore a commodity there.
There is a large sized fish called Hallibut, or Turbut: Turbut or Hallibut.
[416]
some are taken so bigg that two men have much a
doe to hale them into the boate; but there is {90} such plenty, that the fisher
men onely eate the heads and finnes, and throw away the bodies: such in
Paris would yeeld 5. or 6. crownes a peece: and this is no discommodity.
There are excellent Plaice,[417] and easily taken. They, Plaice.
(at flowing water,) do almost come ashore, so that one
may stepp but halfe a foote deepe and prick them up on the sands and this
may passe with some allowance.

Page 162

Hake[418] is a dainty white fish, and excellent vittell Hake.
fresh; and may passe with other commodities, because
there are multitudes.
There are greate store of Pilchers:[419] at Michelmas, in Pilchers.
many places, I have seene the Cormorants[420] in
length 3. miles feedinge upon the Sent.
Lobsters are there infinite in store in all the parts of the Lobsters.
land, and very excellent. The most use that I made of
them, in 5. yeares after I came there, was but to baite my Hooke for to catch
Basse; I had bin so cloyed with them the first day I went a shore.
This being knowne, they shall passe for a commodity to the inhabitants; for
the Salvages will meete 500, or 1000. at a place where Lobsters come in
with the tyde, to eate, and save dried for store; abiding in that place,
feasting and sporting, a moneth or 6. weekes together.[421]
There are greate store of Oysters in the entrance of all Oysters.
Rivers: they are not round as those of England, but
excellent fat, and all good. I have seene an Oyster banke a mile at length.
Mustles there are infinite store; I have often gon {91} to Mustles.
Wassaguscus, where were excellent Mustles, to eate
for variety, the fish is so fat and large.[422]
Clames is a shellfish, which I have seene sold in Clames.
Westminster for 12. pe. the skore. These our swine
feede upon, and of them there is no want; every shore is full; it makes the
swine proove exceedingly, they will not faile at low water to be with them.
The Salvages are much taken with the delight of this fishe, and are not
cloyed, notwithstanding the plenty: for our swine we finde it a good
commodity.
Rarer fishes there are. Rarer fish.

Freeles there are, Cockles and Scallopes;[423] and Freele.
divers other sorts of Shellfishe, very good foode.
Now that I have shewed you what commodities are there to be had in the
Sea, for a Market; I will shew what is in the Land, also, for the comfort of

Page 163

the inhabitants, wherein it doth abound. And because my taske is an
abstract, I will discover to them the commodity thereof.
There are in the rivers, and ponds, very excellent Fresh fish, Trouts,
Trouts, Carpes, Breames, Pikes, Roches, Perches, Carpes, Breames,
Pikes, Roches,
Tenches, Eeles, and other fishes such as England doth Perches, Tenches, and
afford, and as good for variety; yea, many of them Eeles.
much better; and the Natives of the inland parts doe
buy hookes of us, to catch them with: and I have knowne the time that a
Trouts hooke hath yeelded a beaver skinne, which hath bin a good
commodity to those that have bartered them away.
These things I offer to your consideration, (curteous Reader,) and require
you to shew mee the like in any part of the knowne world, if you can.

Page 164

{92} Chap. VIII.

Of the goodnes of the Country and the Waters.
Now since it is a Country so infinitely blest with Foode and Fire.
foode, and fire, to roast or boyle our Flesh and Fish,
why should any man feare for cold there, in a Country warmer in the winter
than some parts of France, and neerer the Sunne: unles hee be one of those
that Salomon bids goe to the Ant and the Bee.
There is no boggy ground knowne in all the Country, Noe Boggs.
from whence the Sunne may exhale unwholsom
vapors: But there are divers arematicall herbes and Perfumed aire with
plants, as Sassafras, Muske Roses, Violets, Balme, sweet herbes.
Lawrell, Hunnisuckles, and the like, that with their
vapors perfume the aire; and it has bin a thing much observed that shipps
have come from Virginea where there have bin scarce five men able to hale
a rope, untill they have come within 40. Degrees of latitude and smell the
sweet aire of the shore, where they have suddainly recovered.[424]
And for the water, therein it excelleth Canaan by Of Waters.
much; for the Land is so apt for Fountaines, a man
cannot digg amisse: therefore if the Abrahams and Lots of our times come
thether, there needs be no contention for wells.
Besides there are waters of most excellent vertues, worthy admiration.
[425]
{93} At Ma-re-Mount there was a water, (by mee The Cure of
discovered,) that is most excellent for the cure of mellancolly at
Melancolly probatum. Maremount.

At Weenasemute is a water, the vertue whereof is to The cure of
cure barrennesse. The place taketh his name of that Barrennesse.
Fountaine which signifieth quick spring, or quickning
spring probatum.[426]
Neere Squantos Chappell,[427] (a place so by us Water procuring a
called,) is a Fountaine that causeth a dead sleepe for dead sleepe.
48. howres to those that drinke 24. ounces at a draught,

Page 165

and so proportionably. The Salvages, that are Powahs, at set times use it,
and reveale strang things to the vulgar people by meanes of it. So that in the
delicacy of waters, and the conveniency of them, New Engl. excels
Canaan came not neere this Country. Canaan in fountaines.

As for the Milke and Hony, which that Canaan flowed Milke and Hony
with, it is supplyed by the plenty of birds, beasts and supplied.
Fish; whereof Canaan could not boast her selfe.
Yet never the lesse, (since the Milke came by the A plain paralell to
industry of the first Inhabitants,) let the cattell be Canaan.
chereshed that are at this time in New England, and
forborne but a litle, I will aske no long time, no more but untill the Brethren
have converted one Salvage and made him a good Christian, and I may be
bold to say Butter and cheese will be cheaper there then ever it was in
Canaan. It is cheaper there then in old England at this present; for there are
store of Cowes, considering the people, which, (as my intelligence gives,) is
12000.[428] persons: and in gods name let the people have their desire, who
write to their freinds to come out of Sodome to the land of Canaan, a land
that flowes with Milke and Hony.
{94} And I appeale to any man of judgement, whether it
The Request for the
be not a Land that for her excellent indowments of Nomination of New
Nature may passe for a plaine paralell to Canaan of Canaan.
Israell, being in a more temporat Climat, this being in
40. Degrees and that in 30.

Page 166

Chap. IX.

A Perspective to view the Country by.
As for the Soyle, I may be bould to commend the The Soyle.
fertility thereof, and preferre it before the Soyle of
England, (our Native Country); and I neede not to produce more then one
argument for proffe thereof, because it is so infallible.
Hempe is a thing by Husband men in generall ageed The grouth of Hempe.
upon to prosper best in the most fertile Soyle: and
experience hath taught this rule, that Hempe seede prospers so well in New
England that it shewteth up to be tenne foote high and tenne foote and a
halfe, which is twice so high as the ground in old England produceth it;
which argues New England the more fertile of the two.[429]
As for the aire, I will produce but one proffe for the The aire.
maintenance of the excellency thereof; which is so
generall, as I assure myselfe it will suffice.
No man living there was ever knowne to be troubled No cold cough or
with a cold, a cough, or a murre; but many men, murre.
comming sick out of Virginea to New Canaan have
instantly recovered with the helpe of the purity {95} of that aire;[430] no man
ever surfeited himselfe either by eating or drinking.
As for the plenty of that Land, it is well knowne that The plenty of the
no part of Asia, Affrica or Europe affordeth deare that Land.
doe bring forth any more then one single faune; and in
New Canaan the Deare are accustomed to bring forth 2. and 3. faunes at a
time.[431]
Besides, there are such infinite flocks of Fowle and Multitudes of fish, both
in the fresh waters and also on the Coast, that the like hath not else where
bin discovered by any traveller.
The windes there are not so violent as in England; Windes.
which is prooved by the trees that grow in the face of

Page 167

the winde by the Sea Coast; for there they doe not leane from the winde as
they doe in England: as we have heard before.[432]
The Raine is there more moderate then in England; Raine.
which thing I have noted in all the time of my
residence to be so.
The Coast is low Land, and not high Land: and hee is The Coast.
of a weake capacity that conceaveth otherwise of it,
because it cannot be denied but that boats may come a ground in all places
along the Coast, and especially within the Compas of the Massachusets
patent, where the prospect is fixed.[433]
The Harboures are not to be bettered for safety and Harboures.
goodnesse of ground, for ancorage, and, (which is
worthy observation,) shipping will not there be furred; neither are they
subject to wormes, as in Virginea and other places.
{96} Let the Scituation also of the Country be Scituation.
considered, (together with the rest which is discovered
in the front of this abstract,) and then I hope no man will hold this land
unworthy to be intituled by the name of the second Canaan.
And, since the Seperatists are desirous to have the The Nomination.
denomination thereof, I am become an humble Suter
on their behalfe for your consents, (courteous Readers,) to it, before I doe
shew you what Revels they have kept in New Canaan.[434]

Page 168

Chap. X.

Of the Great Lake of Erocoise in New England, and the
commodities thereof.
Westwards from the Massachusetts bay, (which lyeth in 42. Degrees and 30.
Minutes of Northerne latitude,) is scituated a very spacious Lake, (called of
the Natives the Lake of Erocoise[435]) which is farre more excellent then the
Lake of Genezereth, in the Country of Palestina, both in respect of the
greatnes and properties thereof, and likewise of the manifould commodities
it yealdeth: the circumference of which Lake is reputed to be 240. miles at
the least: and it is distant from the Massachussetts bay 300. miles, or there
abouts:[436] wherein are very many faire Islands, where Fowle innumerable.
innumerable flocks of severall sorts of Fowle doe
breede, Swannes, Geese, Ducks, Widgines, Teales, and other water Fowle.
{97} There are also more abundance of Beavers, Deare and Turkies breed
about the parts of that lake then in any place in all the Country of New
England; and also such multitudes of fish, (which is a Multitudes of Fish.
great part of the foode that the Beavers live upon,) that
it is a thing to be admired at: So that about this Lake is The prime place of
the principallst place for a plantation in all New New Canaan.
Canaan, both for pleasure and proffit.
Here may very many brave Townes and Citties be erected, which may have
intercourse one with another by water, very commodiously: and it is of
many men of good judgement accounted the prime seate for the Metropolis
of New Canaan.[437] From this Lake, Northwards, is derived the famous
River of Canada, (so named of Monsier de Cane,[438] a Canada, so named of
French Lord that first planted a Colony of French in Monsier de Cane.
America, there called Nova Francia,) from whence
Captaine Kerke[439] of late, by taking that plantation, brought home in one
shipp, (as a Seaman of his Company reported in my hearing,) 25000.
Beaver skinnes.[440]
And from this Lake, Southwards, trends that goodly Patomack.
River, called of the Natives Patomack, which

Page 169

dischardgeth herselfe in the parts of Virginea; from whence it is navigable
by shipping of great Burthen up to the Falls, (which lieth in 41. Degrees and
a halfe of North latitude,) and from the Lake downe to the Falls by a faire
current. This River is navigable for vessels of good Burthen; and thus much
hath often bin related by the Natives, and is of late found to be certaine.[441]
{98} They have also made description of great heards Great heards of
of well growne beasts, that live about the parts of this Beasts as bigg as
Lake, such as the Christian world, (untill this Cowes.
discovery,) hath not bin made acquainted with. These
beasts are of the bignesse of a Cowe; their Flesh being very good foode,
their hides good lether, their fleeces very usefull, being a kinde of wolle as
fine almost as the wolle of the Beaver; and the Salvages doe make garments
thereof.
It is tenne yeares since first the relation of these things came to the eares of
the English: at which time wee were but slender proficients in the language
of the Natives, and they, (which now have attained to more perfection of
English,) could not then make us rightly apprehend their meaninge.[442]
Wee supposed, when they spake of Beasts thereabouts as high as men, they
have made report of men all over hairy like Beavers, in so much as we
questioned them whether they eate of the Beavers, to which they replyed
Matta,[443] (noe) saying they were almost Beavers Brothers. This relation at
that time wee concluded to be fruitles, which, since, time hath made more
apparent.
About the parts of this Lake may be made a very greate Commodity by the
trade of furres, to inrich those that shall plant there; a more compleat
discovery of those parts is, (to my knowleadge,) undertaken by Henry
Ioseline,[444] Esquier, sonne of Sir Thomas Ioseline of Kent, Knight, by the
approbation and appointement of that Heroick and Henry Ioseline
very good Common wealths man, Captaine Iohn imployed for
Mason,[445] Esquier, a {99} true foster Father and lover discovery.
of vertue, (who at his owne chardge,) hath fitted
Master Ioseline and imployed him to that purpose; who no doubt will
performe as much as is expected, if the Dutch, (by gettinge into those parts
before him,) doe not frustrate his so hopefull and laudable designes.

Page 170

It is well knowne they aime at that place, and have a possibility to attaine
unto the end of their desires therein, by meanes of the River of Mohegan,
which of the English is named Hudsons River, where the Dutch have setled
two well fortified plantations already. If that River be derived from the
Lake, as our Country man in his prospect[446] affirmes it to be, and if they
get and fortifie this place also, they will gleane away the best of the Beaver
both from the French and the English, who have hitherto lived wholely by
it; and very many old planters have gained good estates out of small
beginnings by meanes thereof.
And it is well knowne to some of our Nation that have The Dutch have a
lived in the Dutch plantation that the Dutch have great trade of Beaver
gained by Beaver 20000. pound a yeare.[447] in Hudsons River.

The Salvages make report of 3. great Rivers that issue out of this Lake, 2. of
which are to us knowne, the one to be Patomack, the other Canada: and
why may not the third be found there likewise, which they describe to trend
westward, which is conceaved to discharge herselfe into the South Sea? The
Salvages affirme that they have seene shipps in this Lake with 4. Masts,
which have taken from thence for their ladinge earth, that is conjectured to
be some minerall stuffe.
{100} There is probability enough for this; and it may well be thought that so
great a confluxe of waters as are there gathered together, must be vented by
some great Rivers; and that if the third River, (which they have made
mention of,) proove to be true, as the other two have done, there is no doubt
but that the passage to the East India may be obtained The passage to the
without any such daingerous and fruitlesse inquest by East-Indies.
the Norwest, as hetherto hath bin endeavoured: And
there is no Traveller of any resonable capacity but will graunt that about this
Lake must be innumerable springes, and by that meanes many fruitfull and
pleasant pastures all about it. It hath bin observed that the inland part,
(witnes Neepnet,[448]) are more pleasant and fertile then the borders of the
Sea coaste. And the Country about Erocoise is, (not The Country of
without good cause,) compared to Delta, the most Erocois as fertile as
fertile parte in all Ægypt, that aboundeth with Rivers Delta in Ægypt.
and Rivalets derived from Nilus fruitfull channell, like
vaines from the liver; so in each respect is this famous Lake of Erocoise.

Page 171

And, therefore, it would be adjudged an irreparable oversight to protract
time, and suffer the Dutch, (who are but intruders upon his Majesties most
hopefull Country of New England,) to possesse themselves of that so
plesant and commodious Country of Erocoise before us: being, (as
appeareth,) the principall part of all New Canaan for plantation, and not
elsewhere to be paralelld in all the knowne world.

Page 172

{101}

NEW CANAANS GENIVS.
EPILOGVS.

Page 173

Thou that art by Fates degree,
Or Providence, ordain’d to see
Natures wonder, her rich store
Ne’-r discovered before,
Th’ admired Lake of Erocoise
And fertile Borders, now rejoyce.
See what multitudes of fish
Shee presents to fitt thy dish.
If rich furres thou dost adore,
And of Beaver Fleeces store,
See the Lake where they abound,
And what pleasures els are found.
There chast Leda, free from fire,
Does enjoy her hearts desire;
Mongst the flowry bancks at ease
Live the sporting Najades,
Bigg lim’d Druides, whose browes
Bewtified with greenebowes.
See the Nimphes, how they doe make
Fine Meanders from the Lake,
Twining in and out, as they
Through the pleasant groves make way,
Weaving by the shady trees
Curious Anastomases,
{102} Where the harmeles Turtles breede,
And such usefull Beasts doe feede
As no Traveller can tell
Els where how to paralell.
Colcos golden Fleece reject;
This deserveth best respect.
In sweete Peans let thy voyce,
Sing the praise of Erocoise,
Peans to advaunce her name,
New Canaans everlasting fame.

Page 174

Page 175

{103}

NEW ENGLISH CANAAN,
OR NEW CANAAN.

The Third Booke.

Containing a description of the People that are planted there,
what remarkable Accidents have happened there since they were
setled, what Tenents they hould, together with the practise of
their Church.

Chap. I.

Of a great League made with the Plimmouth Planters after their
arrivall, by the Sachem of those Territories.[449]
He Sachem of the Territories where the Planters of New
England are setled, that are the first of the now
Inhabitants of New Canaan, not knowing what they
were, or whether they would be freindes or foes, and
{104} being desirous to purchase their freindship that hee
might have the better Assurance of quiet tradinge with
them, (which hee conceived would be very
advantagious to him,) was desirous to prepare an

Page 176

ambassador, with commission to treat on his behalfe, A Salvage sent an
to that purpose; and having one that had beene in Ambassador to the
England (taken by a worthlesse man[450] out of other English at their first-
comminge.
partes, and after left there by accident,) this
Salvage[451] hee instructed how to behave himselfe in the treaty of peace;
and the more to give him incouragement to adventure his person amongst
these new come inhabitants, which was a thinge hee durst not himselfe
attempt without security or hostage, promised that Salvage freedome, who
had beene detained there as theire Captive: which offer hee accepted, and
accordingly came to the Planters, salutinge them with wellcome in the
English phrase, which was of them admired to heare a Salvage there speake
in their owne language, and used him great courtesie: to whome hee
declared the cause of his comminge, and contrived the businesse so that hee
brought the Sachem and the English together, betweene whome was a firme
league concluded, which yet continueth. After which league the Sachem,
being in company with the other whome hee had freed and suffered to live
with the English, espijnge a place where a hole had been made in the
grounde, where was their store of powder layed to be preserved from
danger of fire, (under ground,) demaunded of the Salvage what the English
had hid there under ground; who answered the plague;[452] at which hee
starteled, because of the great mortality lately {105} The Sachem feared
happened by meanes of the plague,[453] (as it is the Plague.
conceaved,) and the Salvage, the more to encrease his
feare, told the Sachem if he should give offence to the English party they
would let out the plague to destroy them all, which kept him in great awe.
Not longe after, being at varience with another Sachem borderinge upon his
Territories, he came in solemne manner and intreated the governour that he
would let out the plague to destroy the Sachem and his men who were his
enemies, promising that he himselfe and all his posterity would be their
everlasting freindes, so great an opinion he had of the English.

Page 177

Chap. II.

Of the entertainement of Mr. Westons people sent to settle a
plantation there.
Master Thomas Weston,[454] a Merchant of London that had been at some
cost to further the Brethren of new Plimmouth in their designes for these
partes, shipped a company of Servants, fitted with provision of all sorts, for
the undertaking of a Plantation to be setled there; with an intent to follow
after them in person. These servants at first arived at Court holy bread at
new Plimmouth, where they were entertained with Plimmouth.
court holy bread by the Brethren: they were made very
wellcome, in shew at least: there these servants goodes were landed, with
promises to be assisted in the choise of a convenient place; and still the
good cheare went forward, and the strong liquors walked. In the meane time
the Brethren were in consultation what was best for their advantage, singing
the songe, Frustra sapit, qui sibi non sapit.
{106} This plantation would hinder the present practice and future profit; and
Master Weston, an able man, would want for no supplies upon the returne
of Beaver, and so might be a plantation that might keepe them under, who
had a Hope to be the greatest: besides his people were no chosen
Seperatists, but men made choice of at all adventures, fit to have served for
the furtherance of Master Westons undertakinges: and that was as much as
hee neede to care for: ayminge at Beaver principally for the better effecting
of his purpose. Now when the Plimmouth men began to finde that Master
Westons mens store of provition grew short with feasting, then they hasted
them to a place called Wessaguscus, in a weake case, and there left them
fasting.

Page 178

Chap. III.

Of a Battle fought at the Massachussets, between the English
and the French.[455]
The Planters of Plimmouth, at their last being in those parts, having defaced
the monument of the ded at Pasonagessit, (by taking away the herse Cloath,
which was two greate Beares skinnes sowed together at full length, and
propped up over the grave of Chuatawbacks mother,[456]) the Sachem of
those territories, being inraged at the same, stirred up his men in his bee
halfe to take revenge: and, having gathered his men together, hee begins to
make an oration in this manner. When last the glorious The Sachems Oration.
light of all the {107} skey was underneath this globe,
and Birds grew silent, I began to settle, (as my custome is,) to take repose;
before mine eies were fast closed, mee thought I saw a A spirit mooving the
vision, (at which my spirit was much troubled,) and, Sachem to Warre.
trembling at that dolefull sight, a spirit cried aloude
behold, my sonne, whom I have cherisht, see the papps that gave thee suck,
the hands that lappd thee warme and fed thee oft, canst thou forget to take
revenge of those uild people that hath my monument defaced in despitefull
manner, disdaining our ancient antiquities and honourable Customes? See
now the Sachems grave lies like unto the common people of ignoble race,
defaced; thy mother doth complaine, implores thy aide against this theevish
people new come hether; if this be suffered I shall not rest in quiet within
my everlasting habitation. This said, the spirit vanished; and I, all in a
sweat, not able scarce to speake, began to gett some strength, and recollect
my spirits that were fled: all which I thought to let you understand, to have
your Councell, and your aide likewise; this being spoken, straight way arose
the grand Captaine and cried aloud, come, let us to The grand Captaine
Armes, it doth concerne us all, let us bid them Battaile; makes a speech.
so to Armes they went, and laid weight for the
Plimmouth boate; and, forceinge them to forsake their landinge place, they
seeke another best for their convenience; thither the Salvages repaire, in
hope to have the like successe; but all in vaine, for the The maine Battaile.
English Captaine warily foresaw, and, perceavinge

Page 179

their plot, knew the better how to order his men fit for Battaile in that place;
hee, bouldly leading his men on, rainged about the feild to and fro, {108}
and, taking his best advantage, lets fly, and makes the Salvages give
ground: the English followed them fiercely on, and made them take trees
for their shelter, (as their custome is,) from whence their Captaine let flie a
maine; yet no man was hurt; at last, lifting up his right arm to draw a fatall
shaft, (as hee then thought to end this difference), received a shott upon his
elbow,[457] and straight way fled; by whose example all the army followed
the same way, and yealded up the honor of the day to The feild wonne by
the English party; who were such a terror to them after the English.
that the Salvages durst never make to a head against
them any more.

Page 180

Chap. IV.

Of a Parliament held at Wessaguscus, and the Actes.
Master Westons Plantation beinge setled at Some lazy people.
Wessaguscus, his Servants, many of them lazy persons
that would use no endeavour to take the benefit of the Country, some of
them fell sicke and died.
One amongst the rest, an able bodied man that ranged A lusty fellow.
the woodes to see what it would afford, lighted by
accident on an Indian barne, and from thence did take a capp full of corne;
the Salvage owner of it, finding by the foote some English had bin there,
came to the Plantation, and made complaint after this manner.
{109} The cheife Commander of the Company one this
A poore complaint.
occation called a Parliament of all his people, but those Edward Iohnson a
that were sicke and ill at ease. And wisely now they cheife Iudge. Maide a
must consult upon this huge complaint, that a privy hainous fact.
knife or stringe of beades would well enough have qualified; and Edward
Iohnson was a spetiall judge of this businesse; the fact was there in
repetition; construction made that it was fellony, and by the Lawes of
England punished with death; and this in execution must be put for an
example, and likewise to appease the Salvage: when straight wayes one
arose, mooved as it were with some compassion, and said hee could not
well gaine say the former sentence, yet hee had conceaved within the
compasse of his braine an Embrion that was of spetiall consequence to be
delivered and cherished; hee said that it would most aptly serve to pacifie
the Salvages complaint, and save the life of one that might, (if neede should
be,) stand them in some good steede, being younge and stronge, fit for
resistance against an enemy, which might come unexspected for any thinge
they knew. The Oration made was liked of every one, and hee intreated to
proceede to shew the meanes how this may be performed: sayes hee, you all
agree that one must die, and one shall die; this younge A fine device.
mans cloathes we will take of, and put upon one that is
old and impotent, a sickly person that cannot escape A wise Sentence.
death, such is the disease one him confirmed that die

Page 181

hee must; put the younge mans cloathes on this man, To hange a sick man
and let the sick person be hanged in the others steede: in the others steede.
Amen sayes one; and so sayes many more.
{110} And this had like to have prooved their finall sentence, and, being
there confirmed by Act of Parliament, to after ages for a President: But that
one with a ravenus voyce begunne to croake and bellow for revenge; and
put by that conclusive motion, alledging such deceipts might be a meanes
hereafter to exasperate the mindes of the complaininge Salvages, and that
by his death the Salvages should see their zeale to Iustice; and therefore hee
should die: this was concluded; yet neverthelesse a Very fit Iustice.
scruple was made; now to countermaund this act, did
represent itselfe unto their mindes, which was, how they should doe to get
the mans good wil? this was indeede a spetiall obstacle: for without that,
they all agreed it would be dangerous for any man to A dangerous Attempt.
attempt the execution of it, lest mischeife should befall
them every man; hee was a person that in his wrath did seeme to be a
second Sampson, able to beate out their branes with the jawbone of an
Asse: therefore they called the man, and by perswation Iesting turned to
got him fast bound in jest; and then hanged him up earnest.
hard by in good earnest,[458] who with a weapon, and
at liberty, would have put all those wise judges of this Parliament to a
pittifull non plus, (as it hath beene credibly reported,) and made the cheife
Iudge of them all buckell to him.

Page 182

{111} Chap. V.

Of a Massacre made upon the Salvages at Wessaguscus.
After the end of that Parliament, some of the plantation there, about three
persons,[459] went to live with Checatawback and his Good quarters with
company; and had very good quarter, for all the former the Salvages.
quarrell with the Plimmouth planters: they are not like
Will Sommers,[460] to take one for another. There they purposed to stay
untill Master Westons arrivall: but the Plimmouth men, intendinge no good
to him, (as appered by the consequence,) came in the meane time to
Wessaguscus, and there pretended to feast the Salvages A plott from
of those partes, bringing with them Porke and thinges Plimmouth.
for the purpose, which they sett before the Salvages.
They eate thereof without suspition of any mischeife, who were taken upon
a watchword given, and with their owne knives, (hanging about their
neckes,) were by the Plimmouth planters stabd and Salvages killed with
slaine: one of which were hanged up there, after the their one weapons.
slaughter.[461]
In the meane time the Sachem had knowledge of this News carried.
accident, by one that ranne to his Countrymen, at the
Massachussets, and gave them intelligence of the newes; after which time
the Salvages there, consultinge of the matter, in the A revenge.
night, (when the other English feareles of danger were
a sleepe,) knockt them all in the head, in revenge of the death of their {112}
Countrymen: but if the Plimmouth Planters had really intended good to
Master Weston, or those men, why had they not kept the Salvages alive in
Custody, untill they had secured the other English? Who, by meanes of this
evill mannaginge of the businesse, lost their lives, and the whole plantation
was dissolved thereupon; as was likely, for feare of a revenge to follow, as a
relatione to this cruell antecedent; and when Master Weston came over hee
found thinges at an evill exigent, by meanes thereof: But could not tell how
it was brought about.

Page 183

The Salvages of the Massachussets, that could not imagine from whence
these men should come, or to what end, seeing them performe such
unexpected actions; neither could tell by what name properly to distinguish
them; did from that time afterwards call the English Planters
Wotawquenange,[462] which in their language signifieth stabbers, or
Cutthroates: and this name was received by those that The Salvages call the
came there after for good, being then unacquainted English cutthroats.
with the signification of it, for many yeares following;
untill, from a Southerly Indian that understood English well, I was by
demonstration made to conceave the interpretation of it, and rebucked these
other that it was not forborne: The other callinge us by the name of
Wotoquansawge, what that doth signifie, hee said, hee was not able by any
demonstration to expresse; and my neighbours durst no more, in my
hearinge, call us by the name formerly used, for feare of my displeasure.

Page 184

{113} Chap. VI.

Of the surprizinge of a Merchants Shipp in Plimmouth harbour.
This Merchant, a man of worth, arrivinge in the parts The Merchant with
of New Canaan and findinge that his Plantation was Supply.
dissolved, some of his men slaine, some dead with
sicknes, and the rest at Plimmouth, hee was perplexed in his minde about
the matter; comminge as hee did with supply, and meanes to have rased
their fortunes and his one exceedingly: and seeinge what had happened
resolved to make some stay in the Plimmouth harbour.[463] And this suted to
their purpose; wherefore the Brethren did congratulate with him at his safe
arrivall, and their best of entertainement for a swetning A glosse upon the
cast, deploring the disaster of his Plantation, and false text.
glozing upon the text, alledging the mischeivous intent
of the Salvages there, which by freindly intelligence of their neighbours
was discovered before it came to be full summed: so that they lost not all,
allthough they saved not all: and this they pretended to proceede from the
Fountaine of love and zeale to him and Christianity, and to chastise the
insolency of the Salvages, of which that part had some dangerous persons.
And this, as an article of the new creede of Canaan, would they have
received of every new commer there to inhabit, that the Salvages are a
dangerous people, subtill, secreat and mischeivous; and that it is dangerous
to live seperated, but {114} rather together: and so be under their Lee, that
none might trade for Beaver, but at their pleasure, as none doe or shall doe
there: nay they will not be reduced to any other song yet of the Salvages to
the southward of Plimmouth, because they would have none come there,
sayinge that hee that will sit downe there must come stronge: but I have
found the Massachussets Indian more full of humanity then the Christians;
and haue had much better quarter with them; yet I observed not their
humors, but they mine; althoug my great number that I landed were
dissolved, and my Company as few as might be:[464] for I know that this
falls out infallibly where two Nations meete, one must rule and the other be
ruled, before a peace can be hoped for: and for a Where two nations
Christian to submit to the rule of a Salvage, you will meet one must rule

Page 185

say, is both shame and dishonor: at least it is my the other must be
ruled or no quietnes.
opinion, and my practice was accordingly, and I have
the better quarter by the meanes thereof. The more Salvages the better
quarter, the more Christians the worser quarter, I found; as all the
indifferent minded Planters can testifie. Now, whiles the Merchant was
ruminatinge on this mishapp, the Plimmouth Planters perceivinge that hee
had furnished himselfe with excellent Commodities, fit for the Merchandise
of the Country, (and holding it good to fish in trobled A Machivell plot.
waters, and so get a snatch unseene,) practised in
secret with some other in the land, whom they thought apt to imbrace the
benefit of such a cheat, and it was concluded and The Vaile.
resolved upon that all this shipp and goodes should be
confiscated, for businesse done by him, the Lord knowes when, or where:
[465]
{115} a letter must be framed to them, and handes unto it, to be there
warrant; this should shadow them. That is the first practise; they will insane
a man, and then pretend that Iustice must be done. They cause the Merchant
(secure) to come a shore, and then take him in hold, shewing they are
compelled unto it legally, and enter strait abord, peruse the Cargazowne,
and then deliver up the Charge of her to their Shipp and goodes
Confederates: and how much lesse this is then Piraty, confiscated.
let any practise in the Admiralty be judge. The
Merchant, his shipp and goodes confiscated, himselfe a prisoner and
threatned so to be sent and conveyed to England, there to receave the
somme of all that did belonge to him a malefactor, (and a great one to); this
hee, good man, indured with patience longe time, untill the best of all his
goodes were quite dispersed, and every actor [had] his When every
proportion; the Merchant was [then] inlarged; his Conspirator had his
shipp, a burthen to the owner now, his undertakinges share the shipp
in these partes beinge quite overthrowne, was delivered againe.
redelivered, and bondes of him were taken not to Bonds taken not to
prosecute: hee, being greived hereat, betakes him to prosecute.
drive a trade betweene that and Virginea many yeares.
The brethren, (sharpe witted,) had it spread by and by amongst his freinds
in England, that the man was mad. So thought his Report Mr. Weston
wife, so thought his other freindes that had it from a was mad in New
Planter of the Towne. So was it thought of those, that England.
did not know the Brethren could dissemble: why, thus

Page 186

they are all of them honest men in their particular, and Honest men in
every man, beinge bound to seeke anothers good, shall particular.
in the generall doe the best hee can to effect it, and so
they may be excused I thinke.

Page 187

{116} Chap. VII.

Of Thomas Mortons entertainment at Plimmouth, and castinge
away upon an Island.[466]
This man arrived in those parts, and, hearing newes of a Towne that was
much praised, he was desirous to goe thither, and see how thinges stood;
where his entertainement was their best, I dare be Brave entertainement
bould to say: for, although they had but 3. Cowes in in a wildernes.
all,[467] yet had they fresh butter and a sallet of egges
in dainty wise, a dish not common in a wildernes. There hee bestowed some
time in the survey of this plantation. His new come servants, in the meane
time, were tane to taske, to have their zeale appeare, and questioned what
preacher was among their company; and finding none, did seeme to condole
their estate as if undone, because no man among them had the guift to be in
Ionas steade, nor they the meanes to keepe them in that The meanes.
path so hard to keepe.
Our Master, say they, reades the Bible and the word of God, and useth the
booke of common prayer: but this is not the meanes, the answere is: the
meanes, they crie, alas, poore Soules where is the meanes? you seeme as if
betrayed, to be without the meanes: how can you be stayed from fallinge
headlonge to perdition? Facilis descensus averni:[468] the booke of common
prayer, sayd they, what poore thinge is that, for a man to reade in a booke?
No, no, good sirs, I would you were neere us, you Booke learning
might receave comfort by in{117}struction: give me a despised.
man hath the guiftes of the spirit, not a booke in hand.
I doe profess sayes one, to live without the meanes is dangerous, the Lord
doth know.
By these insinuations, like the Serpent, they did creepe and winde into the
good opinion of the illiterate multitude, that were desirous to be freed and
gone to them, no doubdt, (which some of them after confessed); and little
good was to be done one them after this charme was used: now plotts and
factions how they might get loose: and here was some 35. stout knaves; and
some plotted how to steale Master Westons barque, others, exasperated

Page 188

knavishly to worke, would practise how to gett theire Villanous plots of
Master to an Island, and there leave him; which hee knaves.
had notice of, and fitted him to try what would be
done; and steps aborde his shallop bound for Cape Anne, to the
Massachussets, with an Hogshead of Wine; Sugar hee tooke along, the
Sailes hoist up, and one of the Conspirators aboard to steere; who in the mid
way pretended foule weather at the harboure mouth, and therefore, for a
time, hee would put in to an Island neere, and make some stay where hee
thought to tempt his Master to walke the woods, and so be gone: but their
Master to prevent them caused the sales and oares to be brought a shore, to
make a tilt if neede should be, and kindled fire, Prevented by
broched that Hogshed, and caused them fill the can discretion.
with lusty liqour, Claret sparklinge neate; which was
not suffered to grow pale and flatt, but tipled of with quick dexterity: the
Master makes a shew of keepinge round, but with And discovered in
close lipps did seeme {118} to make longe draughts, drinke.
knowinge the wine would make them Protestants; and
so the plot was then at large disclosed and discovered, and they made
drowsie; and the inconstant windes shiftinge at night did force the kellecke
home,[469] and billedge the boat, that they were forced The Shallop
to leave her so, and cut downe trees that grew by the billedged.
shore, to make Caffes: two of them went over by helpe
of a fore saile almost a mile to the maine; the other two Two men of the
stayed five dayes after, till the windes would serve to Company cast away
fill the sailes. The first two went to cape Ann by land, swim to shore upon
and had fowle enough, and fowle wether by the way; trees.
the Islanders had fish enough, shel-fish and fire to roast, and they could not
perish for lacke of foode, and wine they had to be sure; and by this you see
they were not then in any want: the wine and goodes brought thence; the
boat left there so billedgd that it was not worth the labor to be mended.

Page 189

Chap. VIII.

Of the Banishment of Master Iohn Layford, and Iohn Oldam
from Plimmouth.[470]
Master Layford was at the Merchants chardge sent to A Minister required to
Plimmouth plantation to be their Pastor: But the renounce his callinge.
Brethren, before they would allow of it, would have
him first renounce his calling to the office of the Ministery, received in
England, as hereticall and Papisticall, (so hee confest,) and then to receive a
new callinge from them, after their fantasticall invention:[471] {119} which
hee refused, alledging and maintaining that his calling as it stood was
lawfull, and that hee would not renounce it; and so Iohn Oldam, his opinion
was one the affirmative; and both together did maintaine the Church of
England to be a true Church, although in some particulars, (they said,)
defective; concludinge so against the Tenents there: and by this meanes
cancelled theire good opinion amonst the number of the Seperatists, that
stay they must not, lest they should be spies: and to fall fowle on this
occation the Brethren thought it would betray their cause, and make it fall
under censure, therefore against Master Layford they had found out some
scandall to be laid on his former corse of life, to blemish that; and so, to
conclude, hee was a spotted beast, and not to be allowed where they
ordained to have the Passover kept so zealously: as for Iohn Oldam, they
could see hee would be passionate and moody, and proove himselfe a mad
Iack in his mood, and as soone mooved to be moody, and this impatience
would Minister advantage to them to be ridd of him.
Hanniball when hee had to doe with Fabius was kept in awe more by the
patience of that one enemy, then by the resolution of Impatience confuted
the whole army: A well tempered enemy is a terrible by example.
enemy to incounter. They injoyne him to come to their
needeles watch howse in person, and for refusinge give him a cracked
Crowne for presse money, and make the blood run New Plimmouth
downe about his eares; a poore trick, yet a good vaile, presse money.
though Luscus may see thorough it; and, for his further
behaviour in the Case, proceed to sentence {120} him with banishment,

Page 190

which was performed after a solemne invention in this manner: A lane of
Musketiers was made, and hee compelled in scorne to The Solemnity of
passe along betweene, and to receave a bob upon the banishment.
bumme be every musketier; and then a board a shallop,
and so convayed to Wessaguscus shoare, and staid at Massachussets: to
whome Iohn Layford and some few more did resort; where Master Layford
freely executed his office and preached every Lords day, and yet maintained
his wife and children foure or five upon his industry there, with the blessing
of God and the plenty of the Land, without the helpe of his auditory, in an
honest and laudable manner; till hee was wearied and made to leave the
Country.[472]

Page 191

Chap. IX.

Of a barren doe of Virginea growne fruithfull in New Canaan.
[473]

Children, and the fruit of the Wombe, are said in holy writt to be an
inheritance that commeth of the Lord; then they must be coupled in Gods
name first, and not as this, and some other, have done.
They are as arrowes in the hand of a Gyant; and happy, A great happines
saith David, is the man that hath his quiver full of comes by
them; and by that rule, happy is that Land, and blessed propagation.
to, that is apt and fit for increase of children.
I have shewed you before, in the second part of the discourse, how apt it is
for the increase of Minerals, Vegetables, and sensible Creatures.
Now I will shew you how apt New Canaan is like{121}wise for the increase
of the reasonable Creatures; Children, of all riches, being the principall: and
I give you this for an instance.
This Country of New Canaan in seaven yeares time could show more
Children livinge, that have beene borne there, then in 27. yeares could be
shewen in Virginea;[474] yet here are but a handful of weomen landed, to
that of Virginea.
The Country doth afford such plenty of Lobsters and More Children in New
other delicate shellfish, and Venus is said to be borne Canaan in 7. yeares,
of the Sea; or else it was some sallet herbe proper to then in Virginea in 27.
the Climate, or the fountaine at Weenaseemute[475]
made her become teeming here that had tried a campe royall in other partes
where shee had been; and yet never the neere, till shee came in to New
Canaan.
Shee was delivered, (in a voyage to Virginea,) about Delivered neare
Bussardes bay, to west of Cape Cod, where shee had a Bussards bay.
Sonne borne, but died without baptisme and was
buried; and being a thinge remarkable, had this Dead and buried.

Page 192

Epitaph followinge made of purpose to memorize the worth of the persons.

EPITAPH.

Time, that bringes all thinges to light,
Doth hide this thinge out of sight:
Yet fame hath left behinde a story,
A hopefull race to shew the glory:
For underneath this heape of stones
Lieth a percell of small bones;
What hope at last can such impes have,
That from the wombe goes to the grave.

Page 193

[476]
{122} Chap. X.

Of a man indued with many spetiall guifts sent over to be Master
of the Ceremonies.
This was a man approoved of the Brethren, both for his zeale and guiftes,
yet but a Bubble, and at the publike Chardge conveyed to New England, I
thinke to be Master of the Ceremonies betweene the Natives, and the
Planters: for hee applied himselfe cheifly to pen the Stenography one
language downe in Stenography: But there for want of guift.
use, which hee rightly understood not, all was losse of
labor; somethinge it was when next it came to view, but what hee could not
tell.
This man, Master Bubble, was in the time of Iohn Oldams absence made
the howse Chaplaine there, and every night hee made use of his guifts,
whose oratory luld his auditory fast a sleepe, as Oratory another guift.
Mercuries pipes did Argus eies: for, when hee was in,
they sayd hee could not tell how to get out; nay, hee would hardly out till
hee were fired out, his zeale was such: (one fire they say drives out
another): hee would become a great Merchant, and by any thinge that was
to be sold so as hee might have day and be trusted A great Merchant a
never so litle time: the price it seemed hee stood not third guift.
much upon, but the day: for to his freind hee shewed
commodities, so priced as caused him to blame the buyer, till the man this
Bubble did declare that it was tane up at day, {123} and did rejoyce in the
bargaine, insistinge on the day; the day, yea, marry, quoth his friend, if you
have doomesday for payment you are then well to passe. But if he had not,
it were as good hee had; they were payed all alike.
And now this Bubbles day is become a common His day made a
proverbe. Hee obtained howse roome at Passonagessit common prouerbe.
and remooved thether, because it stood convenient for
the Beaver trade: and the rather because the owner of Passonagessit had no
Corne left, and this man seemed a bigg boned man, and therefore thought to
be a good laborer, and to have store of corne; but, contrary wise, hee had
none at all, and hoped upon this freind his host: thithere were brought the

Page 194

trophies of this Master Bubbles honor, his water Trophies of honor.
tankard and his Porters basket, but no provision; so
that one gunne did serve to helpe them both to meat; and now the time for
fowle was almost past.
This man and his host at dinner, Bubble begins to say His long grace made
grace; yea, and a long one to, till all the meate was the meat cold.
cold; hee would not give his host leave to say grace:
belike, hee thought mine host past grace, and further learned as many other
Schollers are: but in the usage and custome of this blinde oratory his host
tooke himselfe abused, and the whiles fell to and had halfe done before this
man Bubble would open his eies to see what stood afore him, which made
him more cautius, and learned that brevis oratio penetrat Cælum. Together
Bubbles and hee goes in the Canaw to Nut Island[477] for brants, and there
his host makes a shotte and breakes the winges of many: Bubble, {124} in
hast and single handed, paddels out like a Cow in a cage: his host cals back
to rowe two handed like to a pare of oares; and, before this could be
performed, the fowle had time to swimme to other flockes, and so to
escape: the best part of the pray being lost mayd his host to mutter at him,
and so to parte for that time discontended.

Page 195

Chap. XI.

Of a Composition made by the Sachem for a Theft committed by
some of his men, shewinge their honest meaninge.
The owner of Passonagessit, to have the benefit of company, left his
habitation in the Winter and reposed at Wessaguscus, (to his cost): meane
time, in the Depth of Winter, the neighbour Salvages, accustomed to buy
foode, came to the howse, (for that intent perhaps,) and The Salvages betake
peepinge in all the windowes, (then unglased,) espied the howse & take the
corne, but no body to sell the same; and having Corne.
company and helpe at hand did make a shift to get into
the howse, and, take out corne to serve but for the present, left enough
behinde: the Sachem having knowledge of the facte, and being advertised
likewise of the displeasure that had ben conceaved by the Proprietor thereof
at this offence, prepares a Messenger, the Salvage that had lived in England,
and sends him with commission for the trespasse of his men, who had tenne
skinnes perposed {125} for it to bee payd by a day certaine: The Sachem, at
the time appointed, bringes the Beaver to Wessaguscus where the owner
lived, but just then was gone abroade: meane time the skinnes were by the
Wessaguscus men gelded, and the better halfe by them juggled away before
the owner came; and hee by the Actors perswaded to A dishonest tricke.
bee contended with the rest, who not so pleased did
draw the Sachem then to make a new agreement, and so to pay his remnant
left in hand, and tenne skinnes more by a new day asigned, and then to
bringe them to Passonagessit; but the Wessaguscus men went the day before
to the Salvages with this sayinge, that they were sent to call upon him there
for payement; and received tenne skinnes, and tooke a Salvage there to
justifie that at their howse the owner stayed the while; hee verified this,
because hee saw the man before at Wessaguscus: the Sachem did beleive
the tale, and at that time delivered up tenne skinnes on that behalfe, in full
dischardge of all demandes against the trespasse and the trespassers, to
them; who consented to him, and them, to the owner, and kept nine[478] to
themselves, and made the Salvage take the tenth, and A consenting tricke.
give the owner all that yet was to bee had, themselves The Heathen more
confessinge their demaunds for him, and that there was

Page 196

but onely one as yet prepared: so that by this you may just, then the
Christians.
easily perceive the uncivilized people are more just
than the civilized.

Page 197

{126} Chap. XII.

Of a voyadge made by the Master of the Ceremonies of New
Canaan to Neepenett, from whence hee came away; and of the
manifold dangers hee escaped.
This woorthy member Master Bubble, a new Master of the Ceremonies,
having a conceipt in his head that hee had hatched a new device for the
purchase of Beaver, beyond Imagination, packes up a sacke full of odde
implements, and without any company but a couple of Indians for guides,
(and therefore you may, if you please, beeleive they Two Salvage guides
are so dangerous as the Brethren of Plimmouth give it conduct Iohn, to
out,) hee betakes him to his progresse into the Inlande Neepenett alone.
for Beaver, with his carriadge on his shoulders like
Milo: his guides and hee in processe of time come to the place appointed,
which was about Neepenett,[479] thereabouts being more Beavers to be had
then this Milo could carry, and both his journey men: glad hee was good
man, and his guides were willing to pleasure him: there the Salvages stay:
night came on, but, before they were inclined to sleepe, this good man
Master Bubble had an evation crept into his head, by misapplying the
Salvages actions, that hee must needs be gone in all hast, yea and without
his errand: hee purposed to doe it so cunningely that his flight should not
{127} be suspected: hee leaves his shooes in the howse, with all his other
implements, and flies: as hee was on his way, to increase his feare,
suggestinge himselfe that hee was pressed[480] by a company of Indians and
that there shafts were let fly as thick as haile at him, hee puts of his
breeches and puts them one his head, for to save him from the shafts that
flew after him so thick that no man could perceave them, and cryinge out,
avoyd Satan, what have yee to doe with mee! thus running one his way
without his breeches hee was pittifully scratched with the brush of the
underwoods, as hee wandred up and downe in unknowne wayes: The
Salvages in the meane time put up all his implements in the sack hee left
behinde and brought them to Wessaguscus, where they thought to have
found him; but, understanding hee was not returned, were ferefull what to
doe, and what would be conceaved of the English was become of this

Page 198

mazed man, the Master of the Ceremonies; and were in consultation of the
matter. One of the Salvages was of opinion the English would suppose him
to be made away; fearefull hee was to come in sight. The other, better
acquainted with the English, (having lived some time in England,[481]) was
more confident, and hee perswaded his fellow that the English would be
satisfied with relation of the truth, as having had testimony of his fidelity.
So they boldly adventured to shew what they had They take a note of
brougt and how the matter stood. The English, (when what was in the sack.
the sack was opened,) did take a note in writing of all
the particulers that were in the sack; and heard what was by the Salvages
related of the acci{128}dents: but, when his shoes were showne, it was
thought hee would not have departed without his shoes; and therefore they
did conceave that Master Bubble was made away by some sinister practise
of the Salvages, who unadvisedly had bin culpable of a crime which now
they sought to excuse; and straightly chardged the Salvages to finde him out
againe, and bring him dead, or alive, else their wifes Mr. Bubble must be
and children should be destroyed. The poore Salvages, found againe or else
being in a pittifull perplexity, caused their Countrymen they shall be
to seeke out for this maz’d man; who, being in short destroyed.
time found, was brought to Wessaguscus; where hee made a discourse of his
travels, and of the perrillous passages, which did seeme to be no lesse
dangerous then these of that worthy Knight Errant, Don Quixote,[482] and
how miraculously hee had bin preserved; and, in conclusion, lamented the
greate losse of his goods, whereby hee thought himselfe undone.
The perticuler whereof being demaunded, it appeared Not any thing
that the Salvages had not diminished any part of them; diminished.
no, not so much as one bit of bread: the number being
knowne, and the fragments laid together, it appeared all the bisket was
preserved, and not any diminished at all: whereby the Master of the
Ceremonies was overjoyed, and the whole Company made themselves
merry at his discourse of all his perrillous adventures.
And by this you may observe whether the Salvage people are not full of
humanity, or whether they are a dangerous people, as Master Bubble and
the rest of his tribe would perswade you.

Page 199

{129} Chap. XIII.

Of a lamentable fit of Mellancolly that the Barren doe fell into,
(after the death of her infant, seeing herselfe despised of her
Sweete hart,) whereof shee was cured.
Whether this goodly creature of incontinency went to worke upon even
termes like Phillis, or noe, it does not appeare by any Indenture of
covenants then extant; whereby shee might legally challenge the
performance of any compleate Marriage at his hands that had bin tradeing
with her, as Demopheon here to fore had bin with his ostis.[483]
Neverthelesse, (for his future advantage,) shee indeavoured, (like Phillis,) to
gaine this Demopheon all to herselfe; who, (as it seemes,) did meane
nothing lesse by leaving her for the next commer, that had any minde to
coole his courage by that meanes; the whipping post, (as it seemes,) at that
time not being in publike use for such kinde of Cony katchers; but seeing
herselfe rejected, shee grew into such a passion of Mellancolly, on a
sodaine, that it was thought shee would exhibit a petition for redresse to
grim Pluto, who had set her a worke; and knowing that the howse of fate
has many entrances, shee was pusseld to finde the Shee cannot one the
neerest way. Shee could not resolve on a sodaine sodaine resolve which
which doore would soonest bring her to his presence dore to goe in att.
handsomely.
{130} If shee should make way with a knife, shee thought shee might spoyle
her drinking in after ages; if by poyson, shee thought it might prolonge her
passage thether; if by drowning, shee thought Caron might come the while
with his boate, and waft her out of sight; if shee should tie up her complaint
in a halter, shee thought the Ropmakers would take exceptions against her
good speede. And in this manner shee debated with herselfe, and demurred
upon the matter: So that shee did appeare willing enough, but a woman of
small resolution.
Which thing when it was publikely knowne, made many come to comfort
her. One amongst the rest was by hir requested, on her behalfe, to write to
her late unkinde Demopheon. The Gentleman, being merrily disposed, in

Page 200

steed of writing an heroicall Epistle composed this Elegi, for a memoriall of
some mirth upon the Circumstance of the matter, to be sent unto hir, as
followeth:

CARMEN ELEGIACVM.

Melpomene, (at whose mischeifous love
The screech owles voyce is heard the mandraks grove,)
Commands my pen in an Iambick vaine
To tell a dismall tale, that may constraine
The hart of him to bleede, that shall discerne
How much this foule amisse does him concerne.
Alecto, (grim Alecto,) light thy tortch
To thy beloved sister next the porch
{131} That leads unto the mansion howse of fate,
Whose farewell makes her freind more fortunate.
A Great Squa Sachem can shee poynt to goe
Before grim Minos; and yet no man know
That knives and halters, ponds, and poysonous things
Are alwayes ready, when the Divell once brings
Such deadly sinners to a deepe remorse
Of conscience selfe accusing, that will force
Them to dispaire, like wicked Kain, whiles death
Stands ready with all these to stopp their breath.
The beare comes by that oft hath bayted ben
By many a Satyres whelpe; unlesse you can
Commaund your eies to drop huge milstones forth,
In lamentation of this losse on earth
Of her, of whome so much prayse wee may finde,
Goe when shee will, shee’l leave none like behinde;
Shee was too good for earth, too bad for heaven.
Why then for hell the match is somewhat even.
After this, the water of the fountaine at Ma-re Mount was thought fit to be
applyed unto her for a remedy, shee willingly used according to the quality
thereof.

Page 201

And when this Elegy came to be divulged, shee was so conscious of her
crime that shee put up her pipes, and with the next shipp shee packt away to
Virginea, (her former habitation,) quite cured of her mellancolly, with the
helpe of the water of the fountaine at Ma-re Mount.

Page 202

{132} Chap. XIV.

Of the Revells of New Canaan.[484]
The Inhabitants of Pasonagessit, (having translated the name of their
habitation from that ancient Salvage name to Ma-re Mount,[485] and being
resolved to have the new name confirmed for a memorial to after ages,) did
devise amongst themselves to have it performed in a solemne manner, with
Revels and merriment after the old English custome; [they] prepared to sett
up a Maypole upon the festivall day of Philip and A Maypole.
Iacob, and therefore brewed a barrell of excellent
beare and provided a case of bottles, to be spent, with other good cheare, for
all commers of that day. And because they would have it in a compleat
forme, they had prepared a song fitting to the time and present occasion.
And upon Mayday they brought the Maypole to the place appointed, with
drumes, gunnes, pistols and other fitting instruments, for that purpose; and
there erected it with the help of Salvages, that came thether of purpose to
see the manner of our Revels. A goodly pine tree of 80. foote longe was
reared up, with a peare of buckshorns nayled one somewhat neare unto the
top of it: where it stood, as a faire sea marke for directions how to finde out
the way to mine Hoste of Ma-re Mount.
And because it should more fully appeare to what end it was placed there,
they had a poem in readines made, which was fixed to the Maypole, to
shew the new name confirmed upon that plantation; which, allthough it
were made according to the occurrents {133} of the time, it, being
Enigmattically composed, pusselled the Seperatists most pittifully to
expound it, which, (for the better information of the reader,) I have here
inserted.

THE POEM.

Page 203

Rise Oedipeus, and, if thou canst, unfould
What meanes Caribdis underneath the mould,
When Scilla sollitary on the ground
(Sitting in forme of Niobe) was found,
Till Amphitrites Darling did acquaint
Grim Neptune with the Tenor of her plaint,
And causd him send forth Triton with the sound
Of Trumpet lowd, at which the Seas were found
So full of Protean formes that the bold shore
Presented Scilla a new parramore
So stronge as Sampson and so patient
As Job himselfe, directed thus, The man who brought
by fate, her over was named
To comfort Scilla so Samson Iob.
unfortunate.
I doe professe, by Cupids beautious mother,
Heres Scogans choise[486] for Scilla, and none other;
Though Scilla’s sick with greife, because no signe
Can there be found of vertue masculine.
Esculapius come; I know right well
His laboure’s lost when you may ring her Knell.
The fatall sisters doome none can withstand,
nor Cithareas powre, who poynts to land
With proclamation that the first of May
At Ma-re Mount shall be kept hollyday.
{134} The setting up of this Maypole was a lamentable spectacle to the
precise seperatists, that lived at new Plimmouth. They termed it an Idoll;
yea, they called it the Calfe of Horeb, and stood at The Maypole called
defiance with the place, naming it Mount Dagon; an Idoll the Calfe of
threatning to make it a woefull mount and not a merry Horeb.
mount.
The Riddle, for want of Oedipus, they could not expound; onely they made
some explication of part of it, and sayd it was meant by Sampson Iob, the
carpenter of the shipp that brought over a woman to her husband, that had
bin there longe before and thrived so well that hee sent for her and her

Page 204

children to come to him; where shortly after hee died: having no reason, but
because of the sound of those two words; when as, (the truth is,) the man
they applyed it to was altogether unknowne to the Author.
There was likewise a merry song made, which, (to make their Revells more
fashionable,) was sung with a Corus, every man bearing his part; which
they performed in a daunce, hand in hand about the Maypole, whiles one of
the Company sung and filled out the good liquor, like gammedes and
Iupiter.

THE SONGE.

Page 205

Cor.

Drinke and be merry, merry, merry boyes;
Let all your delight be in the Hymens ioyes;
Jô to Hymen, now the day is come,
About the merry Maypole take Roome.
Make greene garlons, bring bottles out
And fill sweet Nectar freely about.
{135} Vncover thy head and feare no harme
For hers good liquor to keepe it warme.
Then drinke and be merry, &c.
Iô to Hymen, &c.
Nectar is a thing assign’d
By the Deities owne minde
To cure the hart opprest with greife,
And of good liquors is the cheife.
Then drinke, &c.
Iô to Hymen, &c.

Give to the Mellancolly man
A cup or two of ’t now and than;
This physick will soone revive his bloud,
And make him be of a merrier moode.
Then drinke, &c.
Iô to Hymen, &c.
Give to the Nymphe thats free from scorne
No Irish stuff nor Scotch over worne.
Lasses in beaver coast come away,
Yee shall be welcome to us night and day.
To drinke and be merry &c.
Jô to Hymen, &c.
This harmeles mirth made by younge men, (that lived in hope to have wifes
brought over to them, that would save them a laboure to make a voyage to
fetch any over,) was much distasted of the precise Seperatists, that keepe
much a doe about the tyth of Muit and Cummin, troubling their braines
more then reason would require about things that are indifferent: and from
that time sought occasion against my {136} honest Host of Ma-re Mount, to

Page 206

overthrow his ondertakings and to destroy his plantation quite and cleane.
But because they presumed with their imaginary gifts, (which they have out
of Phaos box,[487]) they could expound hidden misteries, to convince them
of blindnes, as well in this as in other matters of more consequence, I will
illustrate the poem, according to the true intent of the authors of these
Revells, so much distasted by those Moles.
Oedipus is generally receaved for the absolute reader of riddles, who is
invoaked: Silla and Caribdis are two dangerous places for seamen to
incounter, neere unto Vennice; and have bin by poets formerly resembled to
man and wife. The like licence the author challenged for a paire of his
nomination, the one lamenting for the losse of the other as Niobe for her
children. Amphitrite is an arme of the Sea, by which the newes was carried
up and downe of a rich widow, now to be tane up or laid downe. By Triton
is the fame spread that caused the Suters to muster, (as it had bin to
Penellope of Greece;) and, the Coast lying circuler, all our passage to and
froe is made more convenient by Sea then Land. Many aimed at this marke;
but hee that played Proteus best and could comply with her humor must be
the man that would carry her; and hee had need have Sampsons strenght to
deale with a Dallila, and as much patience as Iob that should come there,
for a thing that I did observe in the life-time of the former.
But marriage and hanging, (they say,) comes by desteny and Scogans
choise[488] tis better [than] none at all. Hee that {137} playd Proteus, (with
the helpe of Priapus,) put their noses out of joynt, as the Proverbe is.
And this the whole company of the Revellers at Ma-re Mount knew to be
the true sence and exposition of the riddle that was fixed to the Maypole,
which the Seperatists were at defiance with. Some of them affirmed that the
first institution thereof was in memory of a whore;[489] not knowing that it
was a Trophe erected at first in honor of Maja, the Lady of learning which
they despise, vilifying the two universities with uncivile termes, accounting
what is there obtained by studdy is but unnecessary learning; not
considering that learninge does inable mens mindes to converse with
eliments of a higher nature then is to be found within the habitation of the
Mole.

Page 207

Chap. XV.

Of a great Monster supposed to be at Ma-re-Mount; and the
preparation made to destroy it.[490]
The Seperatists, envying the prosperity and hope of the Plantation at Ma-re
Mount, (which they perceaved beganne to come forward, and to be in a
good way for gaine in the Beaver trade,) conspired together against mine
Host especially, (who was the owner of that Plantation,) and made up a
party against him; and mustred up what aide they could, accounting of him
as of a great Monster.
{138} Many threatening speeches were given out both against his person and
his Habitation, which they divulged should be consumed with fire: And
taking advantage of the time when his company, (which seemed little to
regard theire threats,) were gone up into the Inlands to trade with the
Salvages for Beaver, they set upon my honest host at a place called
Wessaguscus, where, by accident, they found him. The inhabitants there
were in good hope of the subvertion of the plantation at Mare Mount,
(which they principally aymed at;) and the rather because mine host was a
man that indeavoured to advaunce the dignity of the Church of England;
which they, (on the contrary part,) would laboure to vilifie with uncivile
termes: enveying against the sacred booke of common prayer, and mine
host that used it in a laudable manner amongst his family, as a practise of
piety.
There hee would be a meanes to bringe sacks to their mill, (such is the thirst
after Beaver,) and helped the conspiratores to surprise mine host, (who was
there all alone;) and they chardged him, (because they would seeme to have
some reasonable cause against him to sett a glosse upon their mallice,) with
criminall things; which indeede had beene done by such a person, but was
of their conspiracy; mine host demaunded of the conspirators who it was
that was author of that information, that seemed to be their ground for what
they now intended. And because they answered they would not tell him, hee
as peremptorily replyed, that hee would not say whether he had, or he had
not done as they had bin informed.

Page 208

{139} The answere made no matter, (as it seemed,) whether it had bin
negatively or affirmatively made; for they had resolved what hee should
suffer, because, (as they boasted,) they were now become the greater
number: they had shaked of their shackles of servitude, and were become
Masters, and masterles people.
It appeares they were like beares whelpes in former time, when mine hosts
plantation was of as much strength as theirs, but now, (theirs being
stronger,) they, (like overgrowne beares,) seemed monsterous. In breife,
mine host must indure to be their prisoner untill they could contrive it so
that they might send him for England, (as they said,) there to suffer
according to the merrit of the fact which they intended to father upon him;
supposing, (belike,) it would proove a hainous crime.
Much rejoycing was made that they had gotten their cappitall enemy, (as
they concluded him;) whome they purposed to hamper in such sort that hee
should not be able to uphold his plantation at Ma-re Mount.
The Conspirators sported themselves at my honest host, that meant them no
hurt, and were so joccund that they feasted their bodies, and fell to tippeling
as if they had obtained a great prize; like the Trojans when they had the
custody of Hippeus pinetree horse.
Mine host fained greefe, and could not be perswaded either to eate or
drinke; because hee knew emptines would be a meanes to make him as
watchfull as the Geese kept in the Roman Cappitall: whereon, the contrary
part, the conspirators would be so drowsy that hee might have an
opportunity to give them a {140} slip, insteade of a tester. Six persons of the
conspiracy were set to watch him at Wessaguscus: But Mine Host got out of
hee kept waking; and in the dead of night, (one lying prison.
on the bed for further suerty,) up gets mine Host and
got to the second dore that hee was to passe, which, notwithstanding the
lock, hee got open, and shut it after him with such violence that it affrighted
some of the conspirators.
The word, which was given with an alarme, was, ô he’s gon, he’s gon, what
shall wee doe, he’s gon! The rest, (halfe a sleepe,) start up in a maze, and,
like rames, ran theire heads one at another full butt in the darke.

Page 209

Theire grande leader, Captaine Shrimp, tooke on most The Captain tore his
furiously and tore his clothes for anger, to see the clothes.
empty nest, and their bird gone.
The rest were eager to have torne theire haire from theire heads; but it was
so short that it would give them no hold. Now Captaine Shrimp thought in
the losse of this prize, (which hee accoumpted his Master peece,) all his
honor would be lost for ever.
In the meane time mine Host was got home to Ma-re Mine host got home to
Mount through the woods, eight miles round about the ma-re mount.
head of the river Monatoquit that parted the two
Plantations, finding his way by the helpe of the lightening, (for it thundred
as hee went terribly;) and there hee prepared powther, three pounds dried,
for his present imployement, and foure good gunnes for him and the two
assistants left at his howse, with bullets of severall Hee provides for his
sizes, three hounderd or thereabouts, to be used if the enemies.
conspirators should pursue {141} him thether: and these
two persons promised theire aides in the quarrell, and confirmed that
promise with health in good rosa solis.
Now Captaine Shrimp, the first Captaine in the Land, (as hee supposed,)
must doe some new act to repaire this losse, and, to vindicate his reputation,
who had sustained blemish by this oversight, begins now to study, how to
repaire or survive his honor: in this manner, callinge of Councell, they
conclude.
Hee takes eight persons more to him, and, (like the nine Worthies of New
Canaan,) they imbarque with preparation against Ma-re-Mount, where this
Monster of a man, as theire phrase was, had his denne; the whole number,
had the rest not bin from home, being but seaven, would have given
Captaine Shrimpe, (a quondam Drummer,) such a wellcome as would have
made him wish for a Drume as bigg as Diogenes tubb, that hee might have
crept into it out of sight.
Now the nine Worthies are approached, and mine Host prepared: having
intelligence by a Salvage, that hastened in love from Wessaguscus to give
him notice of their intent.

Page 210

One of mine Hosts men prooved a craven: the other had prooved his wits to
purchase a little valoure, before mine Host had observed his posture.
{142} The nine worthies comming before the Denne of this supposed
Monster, (this seaven headed hydra, as they termed him,) and began, like
Don Quixote against the Windmill, to beate a parly, A Parly.
and to offer quarter, if mine Host would yeald; for they
resolved to send him for England; and bad him lay by his armes.
But hee, (who was the Sonne of a Souldier,) having taken up armes in his
just defence, replyed that hee would not lay by those armes, because they
were so needefull at Sea, if hee should be sent over. Yet, to save the effusion
of so much worty bloud, as would haue issued out of the vaynes of these 9.
worthies of New Canaan, if mine Host should have played upon them out at
his port holes, (for they came within danger like a flocke of wild geese, as if
they had bin tayled one to another, as coults to be sold at a faier,) mine Host
was content to yeelde upon quarter; and did capitulate with them in what
manner it should be for more certainety, because hee knew what Captaine
Shrimpe was.
Hee expressed that no violence should be offered to Captaine Shrimpe
his person, none to his goods, nor any of his promiseth that no
Howsehold: but that hee should have his armes, and violence should bee
offered to his person.
what els was requisit for the voyage: which theire
Herald retornes, it was agreed upon, and should be performed.
But mine Host no sooner had set open the dore, and issued out, but instantly
Captaine Shrimpe and the rest of the worties stepped to him, layd hold of
his armes, and had him downe: and so eagerly was every {143} man bent
against him, (not regarding any agreement made with such a carnall man,)
that they fell upon him as if they would have eaten him: some of them were
so violent that they would have a slice with scabbert, and all for haste; untill
an old Souldier, (of the Queenes, as the Proverbe is,) The Worthies rebuked
that was there by accident, clapt his gunne under the for their unworthy
weapons, and sharply rebuked these worthies for their practises.
unworthy practises. So the matter was taken into more
deliberate consideration.
Captaine Shrimpe, and the rest of the nine worthies, made themselves, (by
this outragious riot,) Masters of mine Hoste of Ma-re Mount, and disposed

Page 211

of what hee had at his plantation.
This they knew, (in the eye of the Salvages,) would add to their glory, and
diminish the reputation of mine honest Host; whome they practised to be
ridd of upon any termes, as willingly as if hee had bin the very Hidra of the
time.

Page 212

Chap. XVI.

How the 9. worthies put mine Host of Ma-re-Mount into the
inchaunted Castle at Plimmouth, and terrified him with the
Monster Briareus.
The nine worthies of New Canaan having now the Law in their owne hands,
(there being no generall {144} Governour in the Land; nor none of the
Seperation that regarded the duety they owe their Soveraigne, whose
naturall borne Subjects they were, though translated out of Holland, from
whence they had learned to worke all to their owne ends, and make a great
shewe of Religion, but no humanity,) for they were now to sit in Counsell
on the cause.
And much it stood mine honest Host upon to be very circumspect, and to
take Eacus[491] to taske; for that his voyce was more allowed of then both
the other: and had not mine Host confounded all the arguments that Eacus
could make in their defence, and confuted him that swaied the rest, they
would have made him unable to drinke in such manner of merriment any
more. So that following this private counsell, given him by one that knew
who ruled the rost, the Hiracano ceased that els would split his pinace.
A conclusion was made and sentence given that mine Host should be sent to
England a prisoner. But when hee was brought to the shipps for that
purpose, no man durst be so foole hardy as to undertake carry him.[492] So
these Worthies set mine Host upon an Island, without gunne, powther, or
shot or dogge or so much as a knife to get any thinge Mine host set upon an
to feede upon, or any other cloathes to shelter him with Island without
at winter then a thinne suite which hee had one at that anything, to shift for
time. Home hee could not get to Ma-re-Mount. Upon himselfe.
this Island hee stayed a moneth at least, and was releeved by Salvages that
tooke notice that mine Host was a Sachem of Passonagessit, and would
bringe bottles of strong liquor to him, and unite themselves {145} into a
league of brother hood with mine Host; so full of humanity are these
infidels before those Christians.

Page 213

From this place for England sailed mine Host in a Plimmouth shipp, (that
came into the Land to fish upon the Coast,) that landed him safe in England
at Plimmouth: and hee stayed in England untill the ordinary time for
shipping to set forth for these parts, and then retorned:[493] Noe man being
able to taxe him of any thinge.
But the Worthies, (in the meane time,) hoped they had bin ridd of him.

Page 214

Chap. XVII.

Of the Baccanall Triumphe of the nine worthies of New Canaan.
The Seperatists were not so contended, (when mine Host of Ma-re-Mount
was gone,) but they were as much discontended when hee was retorned
againe: and the rather because theire passages about him, and the businesse,
were so much derided and in songes exemplified: which, (for better
satisfaction of such as are in that kinde affected,) I have set forth, as it was
then in use by the name of the Baccanall Triumphe, as followeth:

[494]
{146} THE POEM.

Page 215

I sing th’ adventures of nine Master Ben: Iohnson.
worthy wights,
And pitty ’tis I cannot call them Knights,
Since they had brawne and braine, and were right able
To be installed of Prince Arthures table;
Yet all of them were Squires of low degree,
The Magi tould of a prodigeous birth
That shortly should be found upon the earth,
By Archimedes art, which they misconster
Vnto their Land would proove a hiddeous monster;
Seaven heades it had, and twice so many feete,
Arguing the body to be wondrous greate,
Besides a forked taile heav’d up on highe
As if it threaten’d battell to the skie.
The Rumor of this fearefull prodigy
Did cause th’ effeminate multitude to cry
For want of great Alcides aide, and stood
Like People that have seene Medusas head.
Great was the greife of hart, great was the mone,
And great the feare conceaved by every one
Of Hydras hiddeous forme and dreadfull powre,
Doubting in time this Monster would devoure
All their best flocks, whose dainty wolle consorts
It selfe with Scarlet in all Princes Courts.
Not Iason nor the adventerous youths of Greece
Did bring from Colcos any richer Fleece.
In Emulation of the Gretian force
These Worthies nine prepar’d a woodden horse,
{147} And, prick’d with pride of like successe, divise
How they may purchase glory by this prize;
And, if they give to Hidreas head the fall,
It will remaine a plat forme unto all
Theire brave atchivements, and in time to comme,
Per fas aut nefas, they’l erect a throne.
Cloubs are turn’d trumps: so now the lott is cast:
With fire and sword to Hidras den they haste,
Mars in th’ assendant, Soll in Cancer now,

Page 216

Mars in th assendant, Soll in Cancer now,
And Lerna Lake to Plutos court must bow.
What though they [be] rebuk’d by thundring Iove,
Tis neither Gods nor men that can remove
Their mindes from making this a dismall day.
These nine will now be actors in this play
And Sumon Hidra to appeare anon
Before their witles Combination:
But his undaunted spirit, nursd with meate
Such as the Cecrops gave their babes to eate,
Scorn’d their base accons; for with Cecrops charme
Hee knew he could defend himselfe from harme
Of Minos, Eacus, and Radamand,
Princes of Limbo; who must out of hand
Consult bout Hidra, what must now be done:
Who, having sate in Counsell, one by one
Retorne this answere to the Stiggean feinds;
And first grim Minos spake: most loving freinds,
Hidra prognosticks ruine to our state
And that our Kingdome will grow desolate;
But if one head from thence be tane away
The Body and the members will decay.
[495]
{148} To take in hand, quoth Eacus, this taske,
Is such as harebraind Phaeton did aske
Of Phebus, to begird the world about;
Which graunted put the Netherlands to rout;
Presumptious fooles learne wit at too much cost,
For life and laboure both at once hee lost.
Sterne Radamantus, being last to speake,
Made a great hum and thus did silence breake:
What if, with ratling chaines or Iron bands,
Hidra be bound either by feete or hands,
And after, being lashd with smarting rodds,
Hee be conveyd by Stix unto the godds
To be accused on the upper ground
Of Lesæ Majestatis, this crime found
T’will be unpossible from thence, I trowe,
Hidra shall come to trouble us belowe.

Page 217

This sentence pleasd the friends exceedingly,
That up they tost their bonnets, and did cry,
Long live our Court in great prosperity.
The Sessions ended, some did straight devise
Court Revells, antiques and a world of joyes,
Brave Christmas gambols:[496] there was open hall
Kept to the full, and sport, the Divell and all:
Laboure’s despised, the loomes are laid away,
And this proclaim’d the Stigean Holliday.
In came grim Mino, with his motly beard,
And brought a distillation well prepar’d;
And Eacus, who is as suer as text,
Came in with his preparatives the next;
Then Radamantus, last and principall,
Feasted the Worthies in his sumptuous hall.
{149} There Charon Cerberous and the rout of feinds
Had lap enough: and so their pastims ends.
THE ILLVSTRATIONS.

Now to illustrate this Poem, and make the sence more plaine, it is to be
considered that the Persons at Ma-re-Mount were seaven, and they had
seaven heads and 14. feete; these were accounted Hidra with the seaven
heads: and the Maypole, with the Hornes nailed neere the topp, was the
forked tayle of this supposed Monster, which they (for want of skill)
imposed: yet feared in time, (if they hindred not mine Host), hee would
hinder the benefit of their Beaver trade, as hee had done, (by meanes of this
helpe,) in Kynyback river finely, ere they were awares; who, comming too
late, were much dismaide to finde that mine Host his boate had gleaned
away all before they came; which Beaver is a fitt companion for Scarlett:
and I beleeve that Iasons golden Fleece was either the same, or some other
Fleece not of so much value.
This action bred a kinde of hart burning in the Plimmouth Planters, who
after sought occasion against mine Host to overthrowe his undertakings and
to destroy his Plantation; whome they accoumpted a maine enemy to theire
Church and State.

Page 218

{150} Now when they had begunne with him, they thought best to proceede:
forasmuch as they thought themselves farre enough from any controule of
Iustice, and therefore resolved to be their owne carvers: (and the rather
because they presumed upon some incouragement they had from the
favourites of their Sect in England:) and with fire and sword, nine in
number, pursued mine Host, who had escaped theire hands, in scorne of
what they intended, and betooke him to his habitation in a night of great
thunder and lightening, when they durst not follow him, as hardy as these
nine worthies seemed to be.
It was in the Moneth of Iune that these Marshallists had appointed to goe
about this mischeifous project, and deale so crabbidly with mine Host.
After a parly, hee capitulated with them about the quarter they proffered
him, if hee would consent to goe for England, there to answere, (as they
pretended,) some thing they could object against him principall to the
generall: But what it would be hee cared not, neither was it any thing
materiall.
Yet when quarter was agreed upon, they, contrary wise, abused him, and
carried him to theire towne of Plimmouth, where, (if they had thought hee
durst have gone to England,) rather then they would have bin any more
affronted by him they would have dispatched him, as Captaine Shrimp in a
rage profest that hee would doe with his Pistoll, as mine Host should set his
foote into the boate. Howsoever, the cheife Elders voyce in that place was
more powerfull than any of the rest, who concluded {151} to send mine Host
without any other thing to be done to him. And this being the finall
agreement, (contrary to Shrimpe and others,) the nine Worthies had a great
Feast made, and the furmity[497] pott was provided for the boats gang by no
allowance: and all manner of pastime.
Captaine Shrimpe was so overjoyed in the performance of this exployt, that
they had, at that time, extraordinary merriment, (a thing not usuall amongst
those presisians); and when the winde served they tooke mine Host into
their Shallop, hoysed Saile, and carried him to the Northern parts; where
they left him upon a Island.

Page 219

Chap. XVIII.

Of a Doctor made at a Commencement in New Canaan.[498]
The Church of Plimmouth, having due regard to the weale publike and the
Brethren that were to come over, and knowing that they would be busily
imployed to make provision for the cure of Soules, and therefore might
neglect the body for that time, did hold themselves to be in duety bound to
make search for a fitting man, that might be able, (if so neede requir’d,) to
take the chardge upon him in that place of imployment: and therefore called
a Counsell of the whole Synagoge: amongst which A Councell called.
company, they chose out a man that long time had bin
nurst up in the tender bosome of the Church: one that had {152} speciall
gifts: hee could wright and reade; nay, more: hee had tane the oath of
abjuration, which is a speciall stepp, yea, and a maine degree unto
perferment. Him they weane, and out of Phaos boxe[499] fitt him with
speciall guifts of no lesse worth: they stile him Doctor, and forth they send
him to gaine imployement and opinion.
What luck is it I cannot hit on his name: but I will give you him by a
periphrasis, that you may know him when you meete him next.
Hee was borne at Wrington, in the County of Somerset, where hee was bred
a Butcher. Hee weares a longe beard, and a Garment like the Greeke that
beggd in Pauls Church.[500] This new made Doctor, comes to Salem to
congratulate:[501] where hee findes some are newly come from Sea, and ill
at ease.
He takes the patient, and the urinall: eies the State there; finds the Crasis
Syptomes, and the attomi natantes: and tells the patient that his disease was
winde, which hee had tane by gapeing feasting over board[502] at Sea; but
hee would quickly ease him of that greife, and quite expell the winde. And
this hee did performe, with his gifts hee had: and then hee handled the
patient so handsomely, that hee eased him of all the winde hee had in an
instant.

Page 220

And yet I hope this man may be forgiven, if hee were made a fitting Plant
for Heaven.
How hee went to worke with his gifts is a question; yet hee did a great cure
for Captaine Littleworth, hee cured him of a disease called a wife:[503] and
yet I hope this man may be forgiven, if shee were made a fitting plant for
heaven.
{153} By this meanes hee was allowed 4. p. a moneth, and the chirgeon’s
chest, and made Phisition generall of Salem: where hee exercised his gifts
so well, that of full 42. that there hee tooke to cure, there is not one has
more cause to complaine, or can say black’s his eie. This saved Captaine
Littleworths credit, that had truck’d away the vittels: though it brought forth
a scandall on the Country by it: and then I hope this man may be forgiven,
if they were all made fitting plants for Heaven.
But in mine opinion, hee deserves to be set upon a palfrey and lead up and
downe in triumph throw new Canaan, with a coller of Iurdans about his
neck, as was one of like desert in Richard the seconds time through the
streets of London, that men might know where to finde a Quacksaluer.[504]

Page 221

Chap. XIX.

Of the silencing of a Minister in new Canaan.[505]
A silenced Minister, out of coveteousnesse,[506] came over into new Canaan
to play the spie: Hee pretended, out of a zealous intent to doe the Salvages
good, and to teach them. Hee brought a great Bundell of Horne books with
him, and carefull hee was, (good man,) to blott out all the crosses of them,
for feare least the people of the land should become Idolaters. Hee was in
hope, with his gifts, to prepare a great auditory against greate Iosua should
arive there.
{154} Hee applyed himselfe on the weeke dayes to the trade of Beaver, but it
was, (as might seeme,) to purchase the principall benefite of the Lande,
when the time should come; for hee had a hope to be the Caiphas of the
Country: and well hee might, for hee was higher by the head than any of his
tribe that came after him.
This man, it seemes, played the spie very handsomely; for in the exercise of
his guifts on the Lords day at Weenasimute,[507] hee espied a Salvage come
in with a good Beaver coate, and tooke occasion to This Caiphas that
reproove the covetous desire of his auditory to trade condemneth
for Beaver on those dayes; which made them all use so Covetousnesse, and
much modesty about the matter for the present, that committeth
it
himselfe.
hee found opportunity, the same day, to take the
Salvage a side into a corner, where (with the helpe of his Wampampeack
hee had in his pocket for that purpose in a readinesse,) hee made a shifte to
get that Beaver coate, which their mouthes watered at; and so deceaved
them all.
But shortly after, when Iosua[508] came into the Land, hee had soone spied
out Caiphas practice, and put him to silence; and either hee must put up his
pipes and be packing, or forsake Ionas posture, and play Demas part
alltogether.[509]

Page 222

{155} Chap. XX.

Of the Practise of the Seperatists to gett a snare to hamper mine
Host of Ma-re-Mount.
Although the nine Worthies had left mine Hoste upon an Island,[510] in such
an inhumane manner as yee heard before; yet when they understood that
hee had got shipping and was gone to England of his owne accord, they
dispatched letters of advise to an Agent they had there: and by the next
shipp sent after to have a snare made, that might hamper mine Host so as
hee might not any more trouble theire conscience: and to that end made a
generall collection of Beaver to defray the chardge, The generall
[511]
and hee was not thought a good Christian that collection made.
would not lay much out for that imployment.
Some contributed three pounds, some foure, some five pounds; and
procured a pretty quantity by that Devise, which should be given to a
cunning man that could make a snare to hamper him.
The Agent, (according to his directions,) does his endeavoure, (in the best
manner hee could,) to have this instrument made: and Noe cost spared for
used no little diligence to have it effected.[512] His the getting of a
reputation stood upon the taske imposed upon him skillfull man.
against mine Host, the onely enemy (accounted) of
their Church and State.
Much inquiry was made in London, and about, for a skillfull man that
would worke the feate. Noe cost {156} was spared, for gold hee had good
store: first hee inquires of one, and then another: at the last hee heard newes
of a very famous man, one that was excellent at making subtile instruments,
such as that age had never bin acquainted with.
Hee was well knowne to be the man, that had wit and wondrous skill to
make a cunning instrument where with to save himselfe and his whole
family, if all the world besides should be drown’d; and this the best; yea,
and the best cheap too, for, no good done, the man would nothing take.

Page 223

To him this agent goes, and praies his aide: Declares his cause, and tells the
substance of his greivance, all at large, and laid before his eies a heape of
gold.
When all was shewd, that could be she’d, and said, what could be said, and
all too little for to have it done, the agent then did see The heape of gold.
his gold refused, his cause despised, and thought
himselfe disgraced to leave the worke undone: so that hee was much
dismaid, yet importun’d the cunning [man], who found no reason to take
the taske in hand.
Hee thought, perhaps, mine Host, (that had the slight to escape from the
nine Worthies, to chaine Argus eies, and by inchauntment make the doores
of the watch tower fly open at an instant,) would not be hampered, but with
much a doe: and so hee was unwilling to be troubled with that taske.
The agent wondring to see that his gold would doe no good, did aske the
cunning man if hee could give him no advise? who said, hee would: and
what was that, thinke you? To let mine Host alone. Who, {157} being ship’d
againe for the parts of New Canaan, was put in at Mine Host arrived
Plimmouth in the very faces of them, to their terrible againe in Plimmouth.
amazement to see him at liberty: and told him hee had
not yet fully answered the matter they could object against him. Hee onely
made this modest reply, that hee did perceave they were willfull people, that
would never be answered: and derided them for their practises and losse of
laboure.[513]

Page 224

Chap. XXI.

Of Captaine Littleworth his new devise for the purchase of
Beaver.
In the meane time, whiles these former passages were, there was a great
swelling fellow, of Littleworth, crept over to Salem, (by the helpe of Master
Charter party,[514] the Tresorer, and Master Ananias Charter party
Increase,[515] the Collector for the Company of Treasorer.
Seperatists,) to take upon him their imployments for a
time.
Hee, resolving to make hay whiles the Sonne did shine, first pretended
himselfe to be sent over as cheife Iustice of the Massachussets Bay and
Salem, forsoth, and tooke unto him a councell; and a worthy one no doubt,
for the Cowkeeper of Salem was a prime man in those imployments; and to
ad a Majesty, (as hee thought,) to his new assumed dignity, hee caused the
Patent of the Massachussets, (new brought into the Land,) to be carried
where hee went in his progresse to and froe, as an embleme of his authority:
which {158} the vulgar people, not acquainted with, thought it to be some
instrument of Musick locked up in that covered case,[516] and thought, (for
so some said,) this man of little-worth had bin a fidler, and the rather
because hee had put into the mouthes of poore silly things, that were sent
alonge with him, what skill hee had in Engines, and in things of quaint
devise: all which prooved in conclusion to be but impostury.
This man, thinking none so worthy as himselfe, tooke Warrants made by
upon him infinitely: and made warrants in his owne Capt. Littleworth in
name, (without relation to his Majesties authority in his name.
that place,) and summoned a generall apparance at the
worshipfull towne of Salem:[517] there in open assembly was tendered
certaine Articles, devised betweene him and theire new Pastor Master
Eager,[518] (that had renounced his old calling to the Ministry receaved in
England, by warrant of Gods word, and taken a new one there, by their
fantasticall way imposed, and conferred upon him with some speciall guifts
had out of Phaos boxe.)[519]

Page 225

To these Articles every Planter, old and new, must signe, or be expelled
from any manner of aboade within the Compas of the Land contained
within that graunt then shewed: which was so large it would suffice for
Elbow roome for more then were in all the Land by 700000. such an army
might have planted them a Colony with [in] that cirquit which hee
challenged, and not contend for roome for their Cattell. But for all that, hee
that should refuse to subscribe, must pack.
The tenor of the Articles were these: That in all {159} causes, as well
Ecclesiasticall as Politicall, wee should follow the rule of Gods word.
This made a shew of a good intent, and all the Mine Host subscribed
assembly, (onely mine Host replyed,) did subscribe: not.
hee would not, unlesse they would ad this Caution: So
as nothing be done contrary or repugnant to the Lawes of the Kingdome of
England. These words hee knew, by former experience, were necessary, and
without these the same would proove a very mousetrapp to catch some
body by his owne consent, (which the rest nothing suspected,) for the
construction of the worde would be made by them of the Seperation to
serve their owne turnes: and if any man should, in such a case, be accused
of a crime, (though in it selfe it were petty,) they might set it on the tenter
hookes of their imaginary gifts, and stretch it to make it seeme cappitall;
which was the reason why mine Host refused to subscribe.
It was then agreed upon that there should be one The Patent.
generall trade used within that Patent, (as hee said,)
and a generall stock: and every man to put in a parte: and every man, for his
person, to have shares alike: and for their stock, according to the ratable
proportion was put in: and this to continue for 12. moneths, and then to call
an accompt.
All were united, but mine Host refused: two truckmasters were chosen;
wages prefixed; onely mine Host put in a Caviat that All consented but
the wages might be paid out of the cleare proffit, mine Host.
which there in black and white was plainely put
downe.
{160} But before the end of 6. moneths, the partners in this stock, (handled
by the Truckmasters,) would have an accoumpt: some of them had
perceaved that Wampambeacke could be pocketted up, and the underlings,

Page 226

(that went in the boats alonge,) would bee neere the Wiser for any thinge,
but what was trucked for Beaver onely.
The accoumpt being made betweene Captaine Insteed of proffit dis-
Littleworth, and the two Truckmasters, it was found proffit.
that instead of increasing the proffit, they had
decreased it; for the principall stock, by this imployment, was freetted so,
that there was a great hole to be seene in the very middle of it, which cost
the partners afterwards one hundred markes to stopp and make good to
Captaine Littleworth.
But mine Host, that sturred not his foote at all for the matter, did not onely
save his stock from such a Cancar, but gained sixe and seaven for one: in
the meane time hee derided the Contributers for being catch’d in that snare.

Page 227

Chap. XXII.

Of a Sequestration made in New Canaan.[520]
Captaine Littleworth, (that had an akeing tooth at mine Host of Ma-re-
Mount,) devised how hee might put a trick upon him, by colour of a
Sequestration; and got some persons to pretend that hee had corne and other
goods of theirs in possession; and the {161} rather because mine Host had
store of corne and hee had improvidently truckt his store for the present
gaine of Beaver; in so much that his people under his chardge were put to
short allowance, which caused some of them to sicken with conceipt of
such useage, and some of them by the practise of the new entertained
Doctor Noddy, with his Imaginary gifts. They sent therefore to exhibit a
petition to grim Minos, Eacus and Radamant, where they wished to have
the author of their greife to be convented:[521] and they had procured it
quickly, if curses would have caused it: for good prayers would be of no
validity, (as they supposed,) in this extremity.
Now in this extremity Capt. Littleworth gave commission to such as hee
had found ready for such imployments to enter in the Commission for
howse at Ma-re-Mount, and, with a shallop, to bring corne.
from thence such corne and other utensilles as in their
commission hee had specified. But mine Host, wary to prevent eminent
mischeife, had conveyed his powther and shott, (and such other things as
stood him in most steed for his present condition,) into the woods for
safety: and, whiles this was put in practise by him, the shallop was landed
and the Commissioners entred the howse, and willfully bent against mine
honest Host, that loved good hospitality. After they had Mine Hosts corne &
feasted their bodies with that they found there, they goods carried away
carried all his corne away, with some other of his by violence.
goods, contrary to the Lawes of hospitality: a smale
parcell of refuse corne onely excepted, which they left mine Host to keepe
Christmas with.
{162} But when they were gone, mine Host fell to make use of his gunne, (as
one that had a good faculty in the use of that instrument,) and feasted his
body neverthelesse with fowle and venison, which hee purchased with the

Page 228

helpe of that instrument, the plenty of the Country and the commodiousnes
of the place affording meanes, by the blessing of God; and hee did but
deride Captaine Littleworth, that made his servants snap shorte in a Country
so much abounding with plenty of foode for an industrious man, with greate
variety.

Page 229

Chap. XXIII.

Of a great Bonfire made for ioy of the arrivall of great Iosua,
surnamed Temperwell, into the Land of Canaan.[522]
Seaven shipps set forth at once, and altogether arrived in the Land of
Canaan, to take a full possession thereof: What are all the 12. Tribes of new
Israell come? No, none but the tribe of Issacar, and some few scattered
Levites of the remnant of those that were descended of old Elies howse.
And here comes their Iosua too among them; and they make it a more
miraculous thing for these seaven shipps to set forth together, and arrive at
New Canaan together, then it was for the Israelites to goe over Iordan
drishod: perhaps it was, because they had a wall on the right hand and a
wall on the left hand.
{163} These Seperatists suppose there was no more difficulty in the matter
then for a man to finde the way to the Counter at noone dayes, betweene a
Sergeant and his yeoman: Now you may thinke mine Host will be hamperd
or never.
These are the men that come prepared to ridd the Land Men that come to ridd
of all pollution. These are more subtile then the the land of pollution.
Cunning, that did refuse a goodly heap of gold.[523]
These men have brought a very snare indeed; and now mine Host must
suffer. The book of Common Prayer, which hee used, to be despised: and
hee must not be spared.
Now they are come, his doome before hand was concluded on: they have a
warrant now: A cheife one too: and now mine Host must know hee is the
subject of their hatred: the Snare must now be used; this instrument must
not be brought by Iosua in vaine.[524]
A Court is called of purpose for mine host: hee there A Courte called about
convented, and must heare his doome before hee goe: mine Host.
nor will they admitt him to capitulate, and know
wherefore they are so violent to put such things in practise against a man

Page 230

they never saw before: nor will they allow of it, though hee decline their
Iurisdiction.
There they all with one assent put him to silence, A divellish sentence
crying out, heare the Governour, heare the Govern: against him.
who gave this sentence against mine Host at first sight:
that he should be first put in the Billbowes, his goods should be all
confiscated, his Plantation should be burned downe to the ground, because
the habitation of the wicked should no more appeare in Israell, and {164} his
person banished from those territories; and this put in execution with all
speede.[525]
The harmeles Salvages, (his neighboures,) came the The Salvages
while, (greived, poore silly lambes, to see what they reproove them.
went about,) and did reproove these Eliphants of witt
for their inhumane deede: the Lord above did open their mouthes like
Balams Asse, and made them speake in his behalfe sentences of unexpected
divinity, besides morrallity; and tould them that god would not love them
that burned this good mans howse; and plainely sayed that they who were
new come would finde the want of such a howses in the winter: so much
themselves to him confest.
The smoake that did assend appeared to be the very Epictetus summa
Sacrifice of Kain. Mine Host, (that a farre of abourd a totius Philosophiæ.
ship did there behold this wofull spectacle,) knew not
what hee should doe in this extremity but beare and forbeare, as Epictetus
sayes[526]: it was bootelesse to exclaime.
Hee did consider then these transitory things are but ludibria fortunæ,[527]
as Cicero calls them. All was burnt downe to the ground, and nothing did
remaine but the bare ashes as an embleme of their cruelty: and unles it
could, (like to the Phenix,) rise out of these ashes and be new againe, (to the
immortall glory and renowne of this fertile Canaan the new,) the stumpes
and postes in their black liveries will mourne; and piety it selfe will add a
voyce to the bare remnant of that Monument, and make it cry for
recompence, (or else revenge,) against the Sect of cruell Schismaticks.

Page 231

{165} Chap. XXIV.

Of the digrading and creating gentry in New Canaan.[528]
There was a zealous Professor in the Land of Canaan, (growne a great
Merchant in the Beaver trade,) that came over for his conscience sake, (as
other men have done,) and the meanes, (as the phrase is,) who in his
minority had bin prentice to a tombe maker; who, comming to more ripenes
of yeares, (though lesse discretion,) found a kinde of scruple in his
conscience that the trade was in parte against the second commandement:
[529]
and therefore left it off wholely, and betooke himselfe to some other
imployments.
In the end hee settled upon this course, where hee had hope of preferrement,
and become one of those things that any Iudas might An Elder.
hange himselfe upon, that is an Elder.
Hee had bin a man of some recconing in his time, (as himselfe would
boast,) for hee was an officer, just under the Exchequer at Westminster, in a
place called Phlegeton: there hee was comptroller, and conversed with noe
plebeians, I tell you, but such as have angels or their attendance, (I meane
some Lawyers with appertenances, that is, Clarks,) with whome a Iugg of
Beare and a crusty rolle in the terme is as currant as a three penny scute at
Hall time.
{166} There is another place thereby, called sticks: these are two daingerous
places, by which the infernall gods doe sweare: but this of Sticks is the
more daingerous of the two, because there, (if a man be once in,) hee cannot
tell how to get out againe handsomely.
I knew an under sheriff was in unawaires, and hee laboured to be free of it:
yet hee broake his back before he got so farre as quietus est: There is no
such danger in Phlegeton, where this man of so much recconing was
comptroller.
Hee being here, waited an opportunity to be made a Iosua displeased.
gentl. and now it fell out that a gentl. newly come into
the land of Canaan, (before hee knew what ground hee stood upon,) had

Page 232

incurred the displeasure of great Iosua so highly that hee must therefore be
digraded.
No reconciliation could be had for him: all hopes were past for that matter:
Where upon this man of much recconing (pretending a graunt of the
approach in avoydance,) helpes the lame dogge over the stile, and was as
jocund on the matter as a Magpie over a Mutton.
Wherefore the Heralls, with Drums, and Trumpets, proclaiming in a very
solemne manner that it was the pleasure of great Iosua, Master Temperwell.
(for divers and sundry very good causes and
considerations, Master Temperwell thereunto especially mooving,) to take
away the title, prerogative and preheminence of the Delinquent, so
unworthy of it, and to place the same upon a Professor of more recconing:
so that it was made {167} a penall thing for any man after to lifte the same
man againe on the top of that stile, but that hee should stand perpetually
digraded from that prerogative. And the place by this meanes being voyde,
this man, of so much more reckoning, was receaved in like a Cypher to fill
up a roome, and was made a Gentleman of the first head; and his Coate of
Armes, blazon’d and tricked out fit for that purpose, in this Poem following.

THE POEM.

What ailes Pigmalion? Is it Lunacy;
Or Doteage on his owne Imagery?
Let him remember how hee came from Hell,
That after ages by record may tell
The compleate story to posterity.
Blazon his Coate in forme of Heraldry.
Hee beareth argent Put it this way.
alwaies at commaund,
A barre between three crusty rolls at hand,
And, for his crest, with froth, there does appeare
Dextra Paw Elevant a Iugg of beare.
Now, that it may the more easily be understood, I have here endeavoured to
set it forth in these illustrations following: Pigmalion was an Image maker,
who, doteing on his owne perfection in making the Image of Venus, grew to

Page 233

be a mazed man, like our Gentleman here of the first head: and by the
figure Antonomasia[530] is hee herein exemplified.
Hee was translated from a tombe maker to be the {168} tapster at hell,
(which is in Westminster, under the Ex-Chequer office,) for benefit of the
meanes hee translated himselfe into New England, where, by the help of
Beaver and the commaund of a servant or two, hee was advaunced to the
title of a gentleman; where I left him to the exercise of his guifts.

Page 234

Chap. XXV.

Of the manner how the Seperatists doe pay debts to them that
are without.[531]
There was an honest man, one Mr. Innocence Fairecloath,[532] by Mr.
Mathias Charterparty sent over into New Canaan, to raise a very good
marchantable commodity for his benefit; for, whiles the man was bound by
covenant to stay for a time, and to imploy such servants as did there belong
to Mr. Charterparty,[533] hee disdained the tenents of the Seperatists: and
they also, (finding him to be none,) disdained to be imployed by a carnall
man, (as they termed him,) and fought occasion against him, to doe him a
mischeife. Intelligence was conveyed to Mr. Charterparty that this man was
a member of the Church of England, and therefore, (in their account,) an
enemy to their Church and state. And, (to the end they might have some
coloure against him,) some of them practised to get into his debte, which
hee, not mistrusting, suffered, and gave credit for such Commodity as hee
had sold at a price. When the day of payment came, insteede of monyes,
hee, being at that time sick and weake and stood in neede of the Beaver hee
had contracted for, hee had an Epistle full of zealous Goode Payement.
exhortations to provide for the soule; and {169} not to
minde these transitory things that perished with the body, and to bethinke
himselfe whether his conscience would be so prompt to demaund so greate
a somme of Beaver as had bin contracted for. Hee was further exhorted
therein to consider hee was but a steward for a time, and by all likely hood
was going to give up an accompt of his stewardship: and therfore
perswaded the creditor not to load his conscience with such a burthen,
which hee was bound by the Gospell to ease him of (if it were possible;)
and for that cause hee had framed this Epistle in such a freindly maner to
put him in minde of it. The perusall of this, (lap’d in the paper,) was as bad
as a potion to the creditor, to see his debtor Master Subtilety (a zealous
professor as hee thought) to deride him in this extremity, that hee could not
chuse, (in admiration of the deceipt,) but cast out these words:
Are these youre members? if they be all like these, I beleeve the Divell was
the setter of their Church.

Page 235

This was called in question when Mr. Fairecloath least thought of it. Capt.
Littleworth must be the man must presse it against him, for blasphemy
against the Church of Salem: and to greate Iosua Temperwell hee goes with
a bitter accusation, to have Master Innocence made an Blasphemy an
example for all carnall men to presume to speake the example for carnall
least word that might tend to the dishonor of the men.
Church of Salem; yea, the mother Church of all that
holy Land.
And hee convented was before their Synagoge, where no defence would
serve his turne; yet was there none to be seene to accuse him, save the
Court alone.
{170} The time of his sicknes, nor the urgent cause, were not allowed to be
urg’d for him; but whatsoever could be thought upon against him was
urged, seeing hee was a carnall man, of them that are without. So that it
seemes, by those proceedings there, the matter was adjudged before he
came: Hee onely brought to heare his sentence in publicke: which was, to
have his tongue bored through; his nose slit; his face branded; his eares cut;
his body to be whip’d in every severall plantation of their Iurisdiction; and a
fine of forty pounds impos’d, with perpetuall banishment: and, (to execute
this vengeance,) Shackles,[534] (the Deacon of Charles Towne,) was as
ready as Mephostophiles, when Doctor Faustus was bent upon mischeife.
Hee is the purser generall of New Canaan, who, (with his whipp, with
knotts most terrible,) takes this man unto the Counting howse: there
capitulates with him why hee should be so hasty for payment, when Gods
deare children must pay as they are able: and hee weepes, and sobbes, and
his handkercher walkes as a signe of his sorrow for Master Fairecloaths
sinne, that hee should beare no better affection to the Church and the Saints
of New Canaan: and strips Innocence the while, and comforts him.
Though hee be made to stay for payment, hee should not thinke it longe; the
payment would be sure when it did come, and hee should have his due to a
doite; hee should not wish for a token more; And then Notable Pay.
tould it him downe in such manner that hee made
Fairecloaths Innocent back like the picture of Rawhead and blowdy bones,
and his shirte like a {171} pudding wifes aperon. In this imployment
Shackles takes a greate felicity, and glories in the practise of it. This cruell

Page 236

sentence was stoped in part by Sir Christopher Gardiner, (then present at the
execution,) by expostulating with Master Temperwell: who was content,
(with that whipping and the cutting of parte of his eares,) to send Innocence
going, with the losse of all his goods, to pay the fine imposed, and
perpetuall banishment out of their Lands of New Canaan, in terrorem
populi.
Loe this is the payment you shall get, if you be one of them they terme,
without.

Page 237

Chap. XXVI.

Of the Charity of the Seperatists.
Charity is sayd to be the darling of Religion, and is indeed the Marke of a
good Christian: But where we doe finde a Commission for ministring to the
necessity of the Saints, we doe not finde any prohibition against casting our
bread upon the waters, where the unsanctified, as well as the sanctified, are
in possibility to make use of it.
I cannot perceave that the Seperatists doe allowe of helping our poore,
though they magnify their practise in contributing to the nourishment of
their Saints; For as much as some that are of the number of those whom
they terme without, (though it were in case of sicknesse,) upon theire
landing, when a little fresh {172} victuals would have recovered their
healths, yet could they not finde any charitable assistance from them. Nay,
mine Host of Ma-re-Mount, (if hee might have had the use of his gunne,
powther and shott, and his dogg, which were denied,) hee doubtles would
have preserved such poore helples wretches as were neglected by those that
brought them over; which was so apparent, (as it Lame charity.
seemed,) that one of their owne tribe said, the death of
them would be required at some bodies hands one day, (meaning Master
Temperwell.)
But such good must not come from a carnall man: if it come from a
member, then it is a sanctified worke; if otherwise, it is rejected as
unsanctified.
But when Shackles[535] wife, and such as had husbands, parents or freinds,
happened to bee sick, mine Hosts helpe was used, and instruments provided
for him to kill fresh vittell with, (wherein hee was industrious,) and the
persons, having fresh vittell, lived.
So doubtles might many others have bin preserved, but they were of the
number left without; neither will those precise people admit a carnall man
into their howses, though they have made use of his in the like case; they
are such antagonists to those that doe not comply with them, and seeke to

Page 238

be admitted to be of their Church, that in scorne they say, you may see what
it is to be without.

Page 239

Chap. XXVII.

Of the practise of their Church.[536]
The Church of the Seperatists is governed by Pastors, Elders and Deacons,
and there is not {173} any of these, though hee be but a Cow keeper, but is
allowed to exercise his guifts in the publik assembly on the Lords day,[537]
so as hee doe not make use of any notes for the helpe of his memory:[538]
for such things, they say, smell of Lampe oyle, and there must be no such
unsavery perfume admitted to come into the congregation.
These are all publike preachers. There is amongst these people a
Deakonesse, made of the sisters, that uses her guifts at home in an assembly
of her sexe, by way of repetition or exhortation:[539] such is their practise.
The Pastor, (before hee is allowed of,) must disclaime his former calling to
the Ministry, as hereticall; and take a new calling after their fantasticall
inventions: and then hee is admitted to bee their Pastor.
The manner of disclaimeing is, to renounce his calling with bitter
execrations, for the time that hee hath heretofore lived in it: and after his
new election, there is great joy conceaved at his commission.[540]
And theire Pastors have this preheminence above the Civile Magistrate:
Hee must first consider of the complaint made against a member: and if hee
be disposed to give the partie complained of an admonition, there is no
more to be said: if not; Hee delivers him over to the Magistrate to deale
with him in a course of Iustice, according to theire practise in cases of that
nature.[541]
[542]
{174} Of these pastors I have not knowne many: some I have observed
together with theire carriage in New Canaan, and can informe you what
opinion hath bin conceaved of theire conditions in the perticuler. There is
one who, (as they give it out there that thinke they speake it to advaunce his
worth,) has bin expected to exercise his gifts in an assembly that stayed his
comming, in the middest of his Iorney falls into a fitt, (which they terme a
zealous meditation,) and was 4. miles past the place appointed before hee
came to himselfe, or did remember where abouts hee went. And how much

Page 240

these things are different from the actions of mazed men, I leave to any
indifferent man to judge; and if I should say they are all much alike, they
that have seene and heard what I have done, will not condemne mee
altogether.
Now, for as much as by the practise of theire Church every Elder or Deacon
may preach, it is not amisse to discover their practise in that perticuler,
before I part with them.[543]
It has bin an old saying, and a true, what is bred in the bone will not out of
the flesh, nor the stepping into the pulpit that can make the person fitt for
the imployment. The unfitnes of the person undertaking to be the
Messenger has brought a blemish upon the message, as Lewes the II. sent a
in the time of Lewes the Eleventh, King of France, Barber Embassador.
who, (having advaunced his Barber to place of Honor,
and graced him with eminent titles), made him so presumptuous to
undertake an Embassage to treat with forraine princes of Civile affaires.
But what was the issue? Hee behaved himselfe so {175} unworthily, (yet as
well as his breeding would give him leave,) that both The Embassage
the Messenger and the message were despised; and despised.
had not hee, (being discovered,) conveyed himselfe
out of their territories, they had made him pay for his barbarous
presumption.[544]
Socrates sayes, loquere ut te videam. If a man observe these people in the
exercise of their gifts, hee may thereby discerne the tincture of their proper
calling, the asses eares will peepe through the lyons hide. I am sorry they
cannot discerne their owne infirmities. I will deale fairely with them, for I
will draw their pictures cap a pe, that you may discerne them plainely from
head to foote in their postures, that so much bewitch, (as I may speake with
modesty,) these illiterate people to be so fantasticall, to take Ionas taske[545]
upon them without sufficient warrant.
One steps up like the Minister of Iustice with the A Grocer.
ballance onely, not the sword for feare of affrighting
his auditory. Hee poynts at a text, and handles it as evenly as hee can; and
teaches the auditory, that the thing hee has to deliver must be well waied,
for it is a very pretious thing, yes, much more pretious then gold or pearle:
and hee will teach them the meanes how to way things of that excellent

Page 241

worth; that a man would suppose hee and his auditory were to part stakes
by the scale; and the like distribution they have used about a bag pudding.
Another, (of a more cutting disposition,) steps in his A Taylor.
steed; and hee takes a text, which hee divides into
many parts: (to speake truly) as many as hee list. The fag end of it hee pares
away, as a superfluous remnant.
{176} Hee puts his auditory in comfort, that hee will make a garment for
them, and teach them how they shall put it on; and incourages them to be in
love with it, for it is of such a fashion as doth best become a Christian man.
Hee will assuer them that it shall be armor of proffe against all assaults of
Satan. This garment, (sayes hee,) is not composed as the garments made by
a carnall man, that are sowed with a hot needle and a burning thread; but it
is a garment that shall out last all the garments: and, if they will make use of
it as hee shall direct them, they shall be able, (like saint George,) to terrifie
the greate Dragon, error; and defend truth, which error with her wide chaps
would devoure: whose mouth shall be filled with the shredds and parings,
which hee continually gapes for under the cutting bourd.
A third, hee supplies the rome: and in the exercise of A Tapster.
his guifts begins with a text that is drawne out of a
fountaine that has in it no dreggs of popery. This shall proove unto you,
(says hee,) the Cup of repentance: it is not like unto the Cup of the Whore
of Babilon, who will make men drunk with the dreggs thereof: It is filled up
to the brim with comfortable joyce, and will proove a comfortable cordiall
to a sick soule, sayes hee. And so hee handles the matter as if hee dealt by
the pinte and the quarte, with Nic and Froth.[546]
An other, (a very learned man indeed,) goes another A Cobler.
way to worke with his auditory; and exhorts them to
walke upright, in the way of their calling, and not, (like carnall men,) tread
awry. And if they should {177} fayle in the performance of that duety, yet
they should seeke for amendement whiles it was time; and tells them it
would bee to late to seek for help when the shop windowes were shutt up:
and pricks them forward with a freindly admonition not to place theire
delight in worldly pleasures, which will not last, but in time will come to an
end; but so to handle the matter that they may be found to wax better and

Page 242

better, and then they shall be doublely rewarded for theire worke: and so
closes up the matter in a comfortable manner.
But stay: Here is one stept up in haste, and, (being not minded to hold his
auditory in expectation of any long discourse,) hee takes a text; and, (for
brevities sake,) divides it into one part: and then runnes so fast a fore with
the matter, that his auditory cannot follow him. Doubtles his Father was
some Irish footeman;[547] by his speede it seemes so. A very patorick.
And it may be at the howre of death, the sonne, being
present, did participat of his Fathers nature, (according to Pithagoras,)[548]
and so the vertue of his Fathers nimble feete being infused into his braines,
might make his tongue out-runne his wit.
Well, if you marke it, these are speciall gifts indeede: which the vulgar
people are so taken with, that there is no perswading them that it is so
ridiculous.
This is the meanes, (O the meanes,) that they pursue: This that comes
without premeditation; This is the Suparlative: and hee that does not
approove of this, they say is a very reprobate.
{178} Many vnwarrantable Tenents they have likewise: some of which being
come to my knowledge I wil here set downe: one wherof, being in publicke
practise maintained, is more notorious then the rest. I will therefore beginne
with that, and convince them of manifest error by the maintenance of it,
which is this:
That it is the Magistrates office absolutely, (and not the Tenent I.
Minsters,) to joyne the people in lawfull matrimony.
[549]
And for this they vouch the History of Ruth, saying Boas was married
to Ruth in presence of the Elders of the people. Herein they mistake the
scope of the text.
2. That it is a relique of popery to make use of a ring in marriage: and that it
is a diabolicall circle for the Divell to daunce in.[550]
3. That the purification used for weomen after delivery is not to be used.
[551]

4. That no child shall be baptised whose parents are not receaved into their
Church first.[552]

Page 243

5. That no person shall be admitted to the Sacrament of the Lords supper
that is without.[553]
6. That the booke of Common prayer is an idoll: and all that use it,
Idolaters.[554]
7. That every man is bound to beleeve a professor upon his bare affirmation
onely, before a Protestant upon oath.
8. That no person hath any right to Gods creatures, but Gods children onely,
who are themselves: and that all others are but usurpers of the Creatures.
9. And that, for the generall good of their Church and commonwealth, they
are to neglect father, mother and all freindship.
{179} 10. Much a doe they keepe about their Church discipline, as if that
were the most essentiall part of their Religion. Tythes are banished from
thence, all except the tyth of Mint and Commin.[555]
11. They differ from us something in the creede too, for if they get the
goods of one, that is without, into their hands, hee shall be kept without
remedy for any satisfaction: and they beleeve that this is not cosenage.[556]
12. And lastly they differ from us in the manner of praying; for they
winke[557] when they pray, because they thinke themselves so perfect in the
highe way to heaven that they can find it blindfould: so doe not I.[558]

Page 244

Chap. XXVIII.

Of their Policy in publik Iustice.
Now that I have anottomized the two extreame parts of this Politique
Commonwealth, the head and the inferior members, I will shew you the
hart, and reade a short lecture over that too; which is Iustice.
I have a petition to exhibit to the highe and mighty Mr. Temperwell; and I
have my choise whether I shall make my plaint in a case of conscience, or
bring it with in the Compas of a point in law. And because I will goe the
surest way to worke, at first, I will see how others are answered in the like
kinde, whether it be with hab or nab, as the Iudge did the Countryman.[559]
Here comes Mr. Hopewell: his petition is in a case of conscience, (as hee
sayes.) But, see, great Iosua allowes conscience to be of his side: yet cuts
him off with this answere; Law is flat against him. Well let {180} me see
another. I marry: Here comes one Master Doubt-not: his matter depends, (I
am sure,) upon a point in Law: alas, what will it not doe, looke ye it is
affirmed that Law is on his side: but Conscience, like a blanket, over
spreades it. This passage is like to the Procustes of Roome, mee thinks; and
therefore I may very well say of them,
Even so, by racking out the joynts & chopping of the head,
Procustes fitted all his guests unto his Iron bedd.
And, if these speede no better, with whome they are freinds, that neither
finde Law nor Conscience to helpe them, I doe not wonder to see mine Host
of Ma-re-Mount speede so ill, that has bin proclaimed an enemy so many
yeares in New Canaan to their Church and State.

Page 245

Chap. XXIX.

How mine Host was put into a whales belly.
The Seperatists, (after they had burned Ma-re-Mount they could not get any
shipp to undertake the carriage of mine Host from thence, either by faire
meanes or fowle,) they were inforced, (contrary to their expectation,) to be
troubled with his company:[560] and by that meanes had time to consider
more of the man, then they had done of the matter: wherein at length it was
discovered that they, (by meanes of their credulity of the intelligence given
them in England of the matter, and the false Carecter of the man,) had runne
themselves headlonge into an error, and had done that on a sodaine which
they repented at leasure, but could not tell which way to help it {181} as it
stood now. They could debate upon it and especially upon two difficult
points, whereof one must be concluded upon: If they sent mine Host away
by banishment, hee is in possibility to survive, to their disgrace for the
injury done: if they suffer him to stay, and put him in statu quo prius, all the
vulgar people will conclude they have bin too rashe in burning a howse that
was usefull, and count them men unadvised.
So that it seemes, (by theire discourse about the matter,) they stood betwixt
Hawke and Bussard: and could not tell which hand to incline unto. They
had founded him secretly: hee was content with it, goe which way it would.
Nay Shackles[561] himselfe, (who was imployed in the burning of the
howse, and therefore feared to be caught in England,) and others were so
forward in putting mine Host in statu quo prius, after they had found their
error, (which was so apparent that Luceus eies would have served to have
found it out in lesse time,) that they would contribute 40. shillings a peece
towards it; and affirmed, that every man according to his ability that had a
hand in this black designe should be taxed to a Contribution in like nature:
it would be done exactly.
Now, (whiles this was in agitation, and was well urged by some of those
partys to have bin the upshot,) unexpected, (in the depth of winter, when all
shipps were gone out of the land,) in comes Mr. Wethercock, a proper
Mariner; and, they said, he could observe the winde: blow it high, blow it

Page 246

low, hee was resolved to lye at Hull[562] rather than incounter such a storme
as mine Host had met with: and this was a man for their turne.
{182} Hee would doe any office for the brethren, if they (who hee knew had
a strong purse, and his conscience waited on the strings of it, if all the zeale
hee had) would beare him out in it: which they professed they would. Hee
undertakes to ridd them of mine Host by one meanes or another. They gave
him the best meanes they could, according to the present condition of the
worke, and letters of credence to the favoures of that Sect in England; with
which, (his busines there being done, and his shipp cleared,) hee hoyst the
Sayles and put to Sea: since which time mine Host has not troubled the
brethren, but onely at the Counsell table: where now Sub iudice lis est.

Page 247

Chap. XXX.

Of Sir Christopher Gardiner Knight, and how hee spedd
amongst the Seperatists.
Sir Christopher Gardiner,[563] (a Knight, that had bin a traveller both by Sea
and Land; a good judicious gentleman in the Mathematticke and other
Sciences usefull for Plantations, Kimistry, &c. and also being a practicall
Enginer,) came into those parts, intending discovery.
But the Seperatists love not those good parts, when they proceede from a
carnall man, (as they call every good Protestant); in shorte time [they] had
found the meanes to pick a quarrell with him. The meanes is that they
pursue to obtaine what they aime at: the word is there, the meanes.
So that, when they finde any man like to proove an enemy to their Church
and state, then straight {183} the meanes must be used for defence. The first
precept in their Politiques is to defame the man at whom they aime, and
then hee is a holy Israelite in their opinions who can spread that same
brodest, like butter upon a loafe: no matter how thin, it will serve for a
vaile: and then this man, (who they have thus depraved,) is a spotted
uncleane leaper: hee must out, least hee pollute the Land, and them that are
cleane.
If this be one of their guifts, then Machevill[564] had as good gifts as they.
Let them raise a scandall on any, though never so innocent, yet they know it
is never wiped cleane out: the staind marks remaines; which hath bin well
observed by one in these words of his,
Stick Candles gainst a Virgin walls white back;
If they’l not burne yet, at the least, they’l black.
And thus they dealt with Sir Christopher: and plotted by all the wayes and
meanes they could, to overthrow his undertakings in those parts.
And therefore I cannot chuse but conclude that these Seperatists have
speciall gifts: for they are given to envy and mallice extremely.

Page 248

The knowledge of their defamacion could not please the gentleman well,
when it came to his eare; which would cause him to make some reply, as
they supposed, to take exceptions at, as they did against Faire cloath:[565]
and this would be a meanes, they thought, to blow the coale, and so to
kindle a brand that might fire him out of the Country too, and send him
after mine Host of Ma-re-Mount.
They take occasion, (some of them,) to come to his howse when hee was
gone up into the Country, and {184} (finding hee was from home,) so went to
worke that they left him neither howse nor habitation nor servant, nor any
thing to help him, if hee should retorne: but of that they had noe hope, (as
they gave it out,) for hee was gone, (as they affirmed,) to leade a Salvage
life, and for that cause tooke no company with him: and they having
considered of the matter, thought it not fit that any such man should live in
so remoate a place, within the Compas of their patent. So they fired the
place, and carried away the persons and goods.
Sir Christopher was gone with a guide, (a Salvage,) into the inland parts for
discovery: but, before hee was returned, hee met with a Salvage that told
the guide, Sir Christopher would be killed: Master Temperwell, (who had
now found out matter against him,) would have him dead or alive. This hee
related; and would have the gentleman not to goe to the place appointed,
because of the danger that was supposed.
But Sir Christopher was nothing dismaid; hee would on, whatsoever come
of it; and so met with the Salvages: and betweene them was a terrible
skermish: But they had the worst of it, and hee scaped well enough.
The guide was glad of it, and learnd of his fellowes that they were promised
a great reward for what they should doe in this imployment.
Which thing, (when Sir Christopher understood,) hee gave thanks to God;
and after, (upon this occasion to sollace himselfe,) in his table booke hee
composed this sonnet, which I have here inserted for a memoriall.

{185} THE SONNET.

Page 249

Wolfes in Sheeps clothing, why will ye
Think to deceave God that doth see
Your simulated sanctity?
For my part, I doe wish you could
Your owne infirmities behold,
For then you would not be so bold.
Like Sophists, why will you dispute
With wisdome so? You doe confute
None but yourselves. For shame, be mute,
Least great Jehovah, with his powre,
Do come upon you in a howre
When you least think, and you devoure.
This Sonnet the Gentleman composed as a testimony of his love towards
them, that were so ill-affected towards him; from whome they might have
receaved much good, if they had bin so wise to have imbraced him in a
loving fashion.
But they despise the helpe that shall come from a carnall man, (as they
termed him,) who, after his retorne from those designes, finding how they
had used him with such disrespect, tooke shipping, and disposed of
himselfe for England; and discovered their practises in those parts towards
his Majesties true harted Subjects, which they made wery of their aboade in
those parts.

Page 250

{186} Chap. XXXI.

Of mine Host of Ma-re-Mount how hee played Ionas after hee
had bin in the Whales belly for a time.
Mine Host of Ma-re-Mount, being put to Sea, had delivered him, for his
releefe by the way, (because the shipp was unvitteled, and the Seamen put
to straight allowance, which could hold out but to the Canaries,) a part of
his owne provision, being two moneths proportion; in all but 3. small
peeces of porke, which made him expect to be famished before the voyage
should be ended, by all likelyhood. Yet hee thought hee would make one
good meale, before hee died: like the Colony servant in Virginea, that,
before hee should goe to the gallowes, called to his wife to set on the
loblolly pot, and let him have one good meale before hee went; who had
committed a petty crime, that in those dayes was made a cappitall offence.
And now, mine Host being merrily disposed, on went the peeces of porke,
wherewith hee feasted his body, and cherished the poore Sailers; and got
out of them what Mr. Wethercock, their Master, purposed to doe with him
that hee had no more provision: and along they sailed from place to place,
from Iland to Iland, in a pittifull wether beaten ship, where mine Host was
in more dainger, (without all question,) then Ionas, when hee was in the
Whales belly; and it was the great mercy of God that they had not all
perished. Vittelled they were but for a moneth, when they wayd Ancor and
left the first port.
{187} They were a pray for the enemy for want of powther, if they had met
them: besides the vessell was a very slugg, and so unserviceable that the
Master called a counsell of all the company in generall, to have theire
opinions which way to goe and how to beare the helme, who all under their
hand affirmed the shipp to be unserviceable: so that, in fine, the Master and
men and all were at their wits end about it: yet they imployed the
Carpenters to search and caulke her sides, and doe theire best whiles they
were in her. Nine moneths they made a shifte to use her, and shifted for
supply of vittells at all the Islands they touched at: though it were so
poorely, that all those helpes, and the short allowance of a bisket a day, and

Page 251

a few Lymons taken in at the Canaries, served but to bring the vessell in
view of the lands end.
They were in such a desperat case, that, (if God in his greate mercy had not
favoured them, and disposed the windes faire untill the vessell was in
Plimmouth roade,) they had without question perished; for when they let
drop an Anchor, neere the Island of S. Michaels,[566] not one bit of foode
left, for all that starving allowance of this wretched Wethercock, that, if hee
would have lanched out his beaver, might have bought more vittells in New
England then he, and the whole ship with the Cargazoun, was worth, (as the
passingers hee carried who vittelled themselves affirmed). But hee played
the miserable wretch, and had possessed his men with the contrary; who
repented them of waying anchor before they knew so much.
Mine Host of Ma-re-Mount, (after hee had bin in {188} the Whales belly,)
was set a shore, to see if hee would now play Ionas, so metamorphosed with
a longe voyage that hee looked like Lazarus in the painted cloath.
But mine Host, (after due consideration of the premisses,) thought it fitter
for him to play Ionas in this kinde, then for the Seperatists to play Ionas in
that kinde as they doe. Hee therefore bid Wethercock tell the Seperatists,
that they would be made in due time to repent those malitious practises, and
so would hee too; for hee was a Seperatist amongst the Seperatists, as farre
as his wit would give him leave; though when hee came in Company of
basket makers, hee would doe his indevoure to make them pinne the basket,
if hee could, as I have seene him. And now mine Host, being merrily
disposed, haveing past many perillous adventures in that desperat Whales
belly, beganne in a posture like Ionas, and cryed, Repent you cruell
Seperatists, repent; there are as yet but 40. dayes, if Iove vouchsafe to
thunder, Charter and the Kingdome of the Seperatists will fall asunder:
Repent you cruell Schismaticks, repent. And in that posture hee greeted
them by letters retorned into new Canaan; and ever, (as opportunity was
fitted for the purpose,) he was both heard and seene in the posture of Ionas
against them, crying, repent you cruel Seperatists, repent; there are as yet
but 40. dayes; if Iove vouchsafe to thunder, the Charter and the Kingdome
of the Seperatists will fall a sunder: Repent, you cruell Schismaticks,
repent. If you will heare any more of this proclamation meete him at the
next markettowne, for Cynthius aurem vellet.[567]

Page 252

Page 253

A TABLE OF THE CONTENTS
OF THE THREE BOOKES:

The Tenents of the first Booke.

Chapters.

1. Prooving New England the principall part of all America, and most
commodious and fit for a habitation and generation.

2. Of the originall of the Natives.

3. Of a great mortallity happened amongst the Natives.

4. Of their howses and habitations.

5. Of their Religion.

6. Of the Indians apparrell.

7. Of their Childbearing.

8. Of their reverence and respect to age.

Page 254

9. Of their Juggelling tricks.

10. Of their Duelles.

11. Of the maintenance of their reputation.

12. Of their Traffick and trade one with another.

13. Of their Magazines and Storehowses.

14. Of theire Subtilety.

15. Of their admirable perfection in the use of their sences.

16. Of their acknowledgement of the creation and immortality of the Soule.

17. Of their Annalls and Funeralls.

18. Of their Custome in burning the Country.

19. Of their Inclination to drunckennes.

20. Of their Philosophicall life.

The Tenents of the second Booke.

Chap.

1. The generall Survey of the Country.

2. What trees are there and how commodious.

3. What Potherbes are there and for Sallets.

4. Of the Birds of the aire and fethered Fowles.

Page 255

5. Of the Beasts of the Forrest.

6. Of Stones and Mineralls.

7. Of the Fishes and what commodity they proove.

8. Of the goodnes of the Country and the Fountaines.

9. A Perspective to view the Country by.

10. Of the great Lake of Erocoise.

The Tenents of the third Booke.

Chap.

1. Of a great legue made betweene the Salvages and English.

2. Of the entertainment of Master Westons people.

3. Of a great Battaile fought betweene the English and the Indians.

4. Of a Parliament held at Wessaguscus.

5. Of a Massacre made upon the Salvages.

6. Of the Surprizing of a Marchants Shipp.

7. Of Thomas Mortons Entertainement and wrack.

8. Of the banishment of Iohn Layford and Iohn Oldam.

9. Of a barren doe of Virginea growne Fruithfull.

10. Of the Master of the Ceremonies.

Page 256

11. Of a Composition made for a Salvages theft.

12. Of a voyage made by the Master of the Ceremonies for Beaver.

13. A lamentable fitt of mellancolly cured.

14. The Revells of New Canaan.

15. Of a great Monster supposed to be at Ma-re-Mount.

16. How the nine Worthies of New Canaan put mine Host of Ma-re-Mount
into an inchaunted Castle.

17. Of the baccanall Triumphe of New Canaan.

18. Of a Doctor made at commencement.

19. Of the silencing of a Minister.

20. Of a practise to get a snare to hamper mine host of Ma-re-Mount.

21. Of Captaine Littleworths devise for the purchase of Beaver.

22. Of a Sequestration in New Canaan.

23. Of a great bonfire made in New Canaan.

24. Of the digradinge and creatinge of Gentry.

25. Of the manner how the Seperatists pay their debts.

26. Of the Charity of the Seperatists.

27. Of the practise of their Church.

28. Of their Policy in publik Iustice.

Page 257

29. How mine Host was put into a Whales belly.

30. How Sir Christopher Gardiner, Knight, speed amongst the Seperatists.

31. How mine Host of Ma-re-Mount played Jonas after hee got out of the
Whales belly.

FINIS.

Page 258

THE PRINCE SOCIETY.

Page 259

OFFICERS
OF
THE PRINCE SOCIETY.
1883.
President.
THE REV. EDMUND F. SLAFTER, A.M. Boston, Mass.
Vice-Presidents.
JOHN WARD DEAN, A.M. Boston, Mass.
WILLIAM B. TRASK, Esq. Boston, Mass.
THE HON. CHARLES H. BELL, LL.D. Exeter, N.H.
JOHN MARSHALL BROWN, A.M. Portland, Me.
Corresponding Secretary.
THE REV. HENRY W. FOOTE, A.M. Boston, Mass.
Recording Secretary.
DAVID GREENE HASKINS, Jr., A.M. Cambridge, Mass.
Treasurer.
ELBRIDGE H. GOSS, Esq. Boston, Mass.

Page 260

THE PRINCE SOCIETY.
1883.
The Hon. Charles Francis Adams, LL.D. Boston, Mass.
Charles Francis Adams, Jr., A.B. Quincy, Mass.
Thomas Coffin Amory, A.M. Boston, Mass.
William Sumner Appleton, A.M. Boston, Mass.
Walter T. Avery, Esq. New York, N.Y.
Mr. Thomas Willing Balch Philadelphia, Pa.
George L. Balcom, Esq. Claremont, N.H.
Charles Candee Baldwin, M.A. Cleveland, Ohio.
Samuel L. M. Barlow, Esq. New York, N.Y.
James Phinney Baxter, A.M. Portland, Me.
The Hon. Charles H. Bell, LL.D. Exeter, N.H.
John J. Bell, A.M. Exeter, N.H.
Samuel Lane Boardman, Esq. Boston, Mass.
The Hon. James Ware Bradbury, LL.D. Augusta, Me.
J. Carson Brevoort, LL.D. Brooklyn, N.Y.
The Rev. Phillips Brooks, D.D. Boston, Mass.
Sidney Brooks, A.M. Boston, Mass.
Horace Brown, A.B., LL.B. Salem, Mass.

Page 261

Mrs. John Carter Brown Providence, R.I.
John Marshall Brown, A.M. Portland, Me.
Joseph O. Brown, Esq. New York, N.Y.
Philip Henry Brown, A.M. Portland, Me.
Thomas O. H. P. Burnham, Esq. Boston, Mass.
George Bement Butler, Esq. New York, N.Y.
The Hon. Mellen Chamberlain, A.M. Chelsea, Mass.
The Hon. William Eaton Chandler, A.M. Washington, D.C.
George Bigelow Chafe, A.M. Boston, Mass.
Clarence H. Clark, Esq. Philadelphia, Pa.
Gen. John S. Clark Auburn, N.Y.
The Hon. Samuel Crocker Cobb Boston, Mass.
Ethan N. Coburn, Esq. Charlestown, Mass.
Jeremiah Colburn, A.M. Boston, Mass.
Deloraine P. Corey, Esq. Boston, Mass.
Erastus Corning, Esq. Albany, N.Y.
Ellery Bicknell Crane, Esq. Worcester, Mass.
Abram E. Cutter, Esq. Charlestown, Mass.
William M. Darlington, Esq. Pittsburg, Pa.
John Ward Dean, A.M. Boston, Mass.
Charles Deane, LL.D. Cambridge, Mass.
Edward Denham, Esq. New Bedford, Mass.
John Charles Dent, Esq. Toronto, Canada.
Prof. Franklin B. Dexter, A.M. New Haven, Ct.
The Rev. Henry Martyn Dexter, D.D. Boston, Mass.
Samuel Adams Drake, Esq. Melrose, Mass.
Henry Thayer Drowne, Esq. New York, N.Y.
Henry H. Edes, Esq. Charlestown, Mass.
Jonathan Edwards, A.B., M.D. New Haven, Ct.
William Henry Egle, A.M, M.D. Harrisburgh, Pa.
Janus G. Elder, Esq. Lewiston, Me.
Samuel Eliot, LL.D. Boston, Mass.
Alfred Langdon Elwyn, M.D. Philadelphia, Pa.
James Emott, Esq. New York, N.Y.

Page 262

The Hon. William M. Evarts, LL. D. New York, N.Y.
Joseph Story Fay, Esq. Woods Holl, Mass.
John S. H. Fogg, M.D. Boston, Mass.
The Rev. Henry W. Foote, A.M. Boston, Mass.
Samuel P. Fowler, Esq. Danvers, Mass.
James E. Gale, Esq. Haverhill, Mass.
Isaac D. Garfield, Esq. Syracuse, N.Y.
Marcus D. Gilman, Esq. Montpelier, Vt.
The Hon. John E. Godfrey Bangor, Me.
Abner C. Goodell, Jr., A.M. Salem, Mass.
Elbridge H. Goss, Esq. Boston, Mass.
The Hon. Justice Horace Gray, LL.D. Boston, Mass.
William W. Greenough, A.B. Boston, Mass.
Isaac J. Greenwood, A.M. New York, N.Y.
Charles H. Guild, Esq. Somerville, Mass.
David Greene Haskins, Jr., A.M. Cambridge, Mass.
The Hon. Francis B. Hayes, A.M. Boston, Mass.
The Hon. Rutherford B. Hayes, LL.D. Fremont, Ohio.
Thomas Wentworth Higginson, A.M. Cambridge, Mass.
W. Scott Hill, M.D. Augusta, Me.
James F. Hunnewell, Esq. Charlestown, Mass.
Theodore Irwin, Esq. Oswego, N.Y.
The Rev. Henry Fitch Jenks, A.M. Lawrence, Mass.
The Hon. Clark Jillson Worcester, Mass.
Mr. Sawyer Junior Nashua, N.H.
George Lamb, Esq. Boston, Mass.
Edward F. De Lancey, Esq. New York, N.Y.
William B. Lapham, M.D. Augusta, Me.
Henry Lee, A.M. Boston, Mass.
John A. Lewis, Esq. Boston, Mass.
Henry Cabot Lodge, Ph.D. Boston, Mass.
Orsamus H. Marshall, Esq. Buffalo, N.Y.
William T. R. Marvin, A.M. Boston, Mass.
William F. Matchett, Esq. Boston, Mass.

Page 263

Frederic W. G. May, Esq. Boston, Mass.
John Norris McClintock, A.M. Concord, N.H.
The Rev. James H. Means, D.D. Boston, Mass.
George H. Moore, LL.D. New York, N.Y.
The Rev. James De Normandie, A.M. Boston, Mass.
Prof. Charles E. Norton, A.M. Cambridge, Mass.
John H. Osborne, Esq. Auburn, N.Y.
George T. Paine, Esq. Providence, R.I.
Nathaniel Paine, Esq. Worcester, Mass.
John Carver Palfrey, A.M. Boston, Mass.
Daniel Parish, Jr., Esq. New York, N.Y.
Francis Parkman, LL.D. Boston, Mass.
Augustus T. Perkins, A.M. Boston, Mass.
The Rt. Rev. William Stevens Perry, D.D., LL.D. Davenport, Iowa.
William Frederic Poole, LL.D. Chicago, Ill.
Rear Admiral George Henry Preble, U. S. N. Brookline, Mass.
Samuel S. Purple, M.D. New York, N.Y.
Edward Ashton Rollins, A.M. Philadelphia, Pa.
The Hon. Nathaniel Foster Safford, A.M. Milton, Mass.
Joshua Montgomery Sears, A.B. Boston, Mass.
John Gilmary Shea, LL.D. Elizabeth, N.J.
The Hon. Mark Skinner Chicago, Ill.
The Rev. Carlos Slafter, A.M. Boston, Mass.
The Rev. Edmund F. Slafter, A.M. Boston, Mass.
Charles C. Smith, Esq. Boston, Mass.
Oliver Bliss Stebbins, Esq. Boston, Mass.
George Stevens, Esq. Lowell, Mass.
George Stewart, Jr., Esq. Quebec, Canada.
Russell Sturgis, A.M. London, Eng.
William B. Trask, Esq. Boston, Mass.
Joseph B. Walker, A.M. Concord, N.H.
William Henry Wardwell, Esq. Boston, Mass.
Miss Rachel Wetherill Philadelphia, Pa.
Henry Wheatland, A.M., M.D. Salem, Mass.

Page 264

John Gardner White, A.M. Cambridge, Mass.
William Adee Whitehead, A.M. Newark, N.J.
William H. Whitmore, A.M. Boston, Mass.
Henry Austin Whitney, A.M. Boston, Mass.
The Hon. Marshall P. Wilder, Ph.D. Boston, Mass.
Henry Winsor, Esq. Philadelphia, Pa.
The Hon. Robert C. Winthrop, LL.D. Boston, Mass.
Charles Levi Woodbury, Esq. Boston, Mass.
Ashbel Woodward, M.D. Franklin, Ct.
J. Otis Woodward, Esq. Albany, N.Y.

LIBRARIES.

American Antiquarian Society Worcester, Mass.
Amherst College Library Amherst, Mass.
Astor Library New York, N.Y.
Bibliothèque Nationale Paris, France
Bodleian Library Oxford, Eng.
Boston Athenæum Boston, Mass.
Boston Library Society Boston, Mass.
British Museum London, Eng.
Concord Public Library Concord, Mass.
Eben Dale Sutton Reference Library Peabody, Mass.
Free Public Library Worcester, Mass.
Free Public Library of Toronto Toronto, Canada.
Gloucester Public Library Gloucester, Mass.
Grosvenor Library Buffalo, N.Y.
Harvard College Library Cambridge, Mass.
Historical Society of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, Pa.
Library Company of Philadelphia Philadelphia, Pa.
Library of Parliament Ottawa, Canada.
Library of the State Department Washington, D.C.
Literary and Historical Society of Quebec Quebec, Canada.

Page 265

Long Island Historical Society Brooklyn, N.Y.
Maine Historical Society Portland, Me.
Maryland Historical Society Baltimore, Md.
Massachusetts Historical Society Boston, Mass.
Mercantile Library New York, N.Y.
Minnesota Historical Society St. Paul, Minn.
Newburyport Public Library, Peabody Fund Newburyport, Mass.
New England Historic Genealogical Society Boston, Mass.
Newton Free Library Newton, Mass.
New York Society Library New York, N.Y.
Peabody Institute of the City of Baltimore Baltimore, Md.
Plymouth Public Library Plymouth, Mass.
Portsmouth Athenæum Portsmouth, N.H.
Public Library of Cincinnati Cincinnati, Ohio.
Public Library of the City of Boston Boston, Mass.
Redwood Library Newport, R.I.
State Historical Society of Wisconsin Madison, Wis.
State Library of Massachusetts Boston, Mass.
State Library of New York Albany, N.Y.
State Library of Rhode Island Providence, R.I.
State Library of Vermont Montpelier, Vt.
Williams College Library Williamstown, Mass.
Woburn Public Library Woburn, Mass.
Yale College Library New Haven, Ct.

Page 266

PUBLICATIONS OF THE SOCIETY.
New England’s Prospect.
A true, lively and experimentall description of that part of America,
commonly called Nevv England: discovering the State of that Countrie,
both as it stands to our new-come English Planters; and to the old Natiue
Inhabitants. By William Wood. London, 1634. Preface by Charles Deane,
LL.D.
The Hutchinson Papers.
A Collection of Original Papers relative to the History of the Colony of
Massachusetts-Bay. Reprinted from the edition of 1769. Edited by William
H. Whitmore, A.M., and William S. Appleton, A.M. 2 vols.
John Dunton’s Letters from New England.
Letters written from New England A.D. 1686. By John Dunton in which are
described his voyages by Sea, his travels on land, and the characters of his
friends and acquaintances. Now first published from the Original
Manuscript in the Bodleian Library, Oxford. Edited by William H.
Whitmore, A.M.
The Andros Tracts.

Page 267

Being a Collection of Pamphlets and Official Papers issued during the
period between the overthrow of the Andros Government and the
establishment of the second Charter of Massachusetts. Reprinted from the
original editions and manuscripts. With a Memoir of Sir Edmund Andros,
by the editor, William H. Whitmore, A.M. 3 vols.
Sir William Alexander and American Colonization.
Including three Royal Charters, issued in 1621, 1625, 1628; a Tract entitled
an Encouragement to Colonies, by Sir William Alexander, 1624; a Patent,
from the Great Council for New England, of Long Island, and a part of the
present State of Maine; a Roll of the Knights Baronets of New Scotland;
with a Memoir of Sir William Alexander, by the editor, the Rev. Edmund F.
Slafter, A.M.
John Wheelwright.
Including his Fast-day Sermon, 1637; his Mercurius Americanus, 1645, and
other writings; with a paper on the genuineness of the Indian deed of 1629,
and a Memoir by the editor, Charles H. Bell, A.M.
Voyages of the Northmen to America.
Including extracts from Icelandic Sagas relating to Western voyages by
Northmen in the tenth and eleventh centuries, in an English translation by
North Ludlow Beamish; with a Synopsis of the historical evidence and the
opinion of Professor Rafn as to the places visited by the Scandinavians on
the coast of America. Edited, with an Introduction, by the Rev. Edmund F.
Slafter, A.M.
The Voyages of Samuel de Champlain.
Including the Voyage of 1603, and all contained in the edition of 1613, and
in that of 1619; translated from the French by Charles P. Otis, Ph.D. Edited,
with a Memoir and historical illustrations, by the Rev. Edmund F. Slafter,
A.M. 3 vols.
New English Canaan, or New Canaan.
Containing an abstract of New England, composed in three books. I. The
first setting forth the Originall of the Natives, their Manners and Customes,
together with their tractable Nature and Love towards the English. II. The
Natural Indowments of the Countrie, and what Staple Commodities it

Page 268

yieldeth. III. What People are planted there, their Prosperity, what
remarkable Accidents have happened since the first planting of it, together
with their Tenents and practice of their Church. Written by Thomas Morton
of Cliffords Inne, Gent, upon ten Years Knowledge and Experiment of the
Country, 1632. Edited, with an Introduction and historical illustrations, by
Charles Francis Adams, Jr., A.B.

VOLUMES IN PREPARATION.

1. Captain John Mason, the founder of New Hampshire, including his Tract
on Newfoundland, 1620, the several American Charters in which he was a
Grantee, and other papers; and a Memoir by the late Charles W. Tuttle,
Ph.D. Edited, with historical illustrations, by John Ward Dean, A.M.
2. Sir Ferdinando Gorges, including his Tract entitled A Brief Narration,
1658, American Charters granted to him, and other papers; with historical
Illustrations and a Memoir by the Rev. Edmund F. Slafter, A.M.
3. Sir Humphrey Gilbert, including his Discourse to prove a Passage by the
North-West to Cathaia and the East Indies; his Letters Patent to discover
and possess lands in North America, granted by Queen Elizabeth, June 11,
1578. With historical Illustrations and a Memoir.
4. Sir Walter Ralegh and his Colony in America. Containing the Royal
Charter of Queen Elizabeth to Sir Walter Ralegh for discovering and
planting of new lands and countries, March 25, 1584, with letters,
discourses, and narratives of the Voyages made to Virginia at his charges,
with original descriptions of the country, commodities, and inhabitants.
Edited, with a Memoir and historical illustrations, by the Rev. Increase N.
Tarbox, D.D.

Page 269

INDEX.

Page 270

INDEX.
A.
Aberdecest, 130, n.
Acomenticus:
charter granted to, by Gorges, 81;
Morton dies at, 91.
Adams, John:
on name of Merry-Mount, 14, n.;
on fate of Wollaston, 15;
on Thomas Morton, 95, n.;
injuries to library of, 101, n.
Adams, John Q., 101.
Adders, 213.
Ælianus, 345, n.
Air of New England, 121, 137, 177, 190.
Alcides, 292.
Alecto, 275.
Alexander, Sir William, quoted, 140, 167.

Page 271

Alder, the, 186.
Allen, J. A., notes on wild animals of New England by, 199-215.
Allerton, Isaac:
his course toward Morton in England, 35, 303;
his mission to England in 1629, 36;
carries Morton back to Plymouth, 36;
tries to obtain charter for Plymouth, 52;
brings over goods, 289, n.
Allize, 225.
Alsatian Squire, the, 92.
Amphitrite, 277, 281.
Animals, wild of New England, chapter on, 199-215.
Antinomian controversy, 81, 323, n.
Antonomasia, 316.
Anúnime, 123, n.
Arbor-vitæ, 185, n.
Archimedes, 291.
Argus eyes, 303.
Aristotle, cited, 117, 118.
Armoniack, 219.
Arms. (See Fire-arms.)
Arthur’s Table, King, 290.
Arundel, Earl of, 60, 70.
Ascowke, 213.
Ash, the, 183.
Aspinwall, William, 319, n.
Audubon, John James, quoted, 131, n., 192, n.
Auk, the great, formerly found in Boston Bay, 131, n.

Page 272

B.
Bacchanal Triumph, poem, 290-4.
Bagnall, Walter, 22, 206, n., 218, n.
Baptism, 331, n.
“Barren doe, the,” 94, 264-6, 272-7.
Barrowe, Henry, on Common Prayer, 332, n.
Bass, 222.
Beach, the, 183.
Bears: used by Indians, 142-4;
value of skins of, 205;
description of, 209;
Indian methods of hunting, 210;
flesh of, 210.
Beaver: value of skins of, 22, 205, 295;
gain in, 32, 282;
regulation of trade in, 39, 306;
virtues of tails of, 162, 205;
description of, 204;
muskrats passed for, 211;
Dutch trade in, 239, n.;
a theft compounded in, 269;
plenty of, at Nipnet, 270;
compared to Jason’s Fleece, 295.
Bible, the, 94, 212, 260.
Bibliography of New Canaan, 99.
Billington, John, 217.
Birch, the, 186.
Birds, chapter on, 189-99.
Black-lead, 219.
Blackstone, William: moves from Wessagusset to Boston, 24;

Page 273

contributes to Morton’s arrest, 30;
an Episcopalian, 94.
Bluefish, 222.
Bole Armoniack, 219.
Book of Common Prayer, 22, 68, 82, 168, 260, 283, 311;
an idol, 69, 332;
Morton persecuted for using, 92-5.
Book of Sports, 260, n.
Boston Bay: savages about in 1625, 11;
settlers about in 1628, 24;
description of in 1630, 122;
great auks seen in, 131, n.;
French vessel wrecked in, 131, n.
Bradford, John, on Common Prayer, 332, n.
Bradford, Governor William: cited, 1, 6, 13, 18, 20, 22, 25, 27, 31, 35,
36, 37, 46, 49, 52, 79, 92, 133, n., 205, n., 217, n., 323, n., 325, n., 330,
n., 332, n.;
letters of, on arrest of Morton, 30;
generally correct, 49;
literary skill of, 96;
absence of humor in, 97, 98;
referred to as Rhadamant, 291, n.
Brant, 189, 268.
Breames, 227.
Brereton, Sir William, grant to, from John Gorges, 34.
Brewster, William, notes on birds by, 189-99, n., 226, n.
Briareus, 288.
Bridges, Robert, 90.
Bright, Rev. Francis, 300, n., 325, n.
Brimstone, 220.

Page 274

Bristol, 2.
Brown, Peter, 214.
Browne, Robert, 323, n.
Brutus, supposed descent of Indians from, 126, 127, 129.
Bubble, 266-8, 270-3.
Buckingham, Duke of, 178, n.
Burdet, Rev. George, corresponds with Laud, 83, 88.
Burglary, 319, n.
Burning undergrowth: Indian custom of, 172, 184, 186;
protection against, 173.
Bursley, John, at Wessagusset, 24, 31, 162, n.
Buzzard’s Bay, 266.
Butler, Samuel, 96, 98, 251, n.

C.
Caen, William and Emery de, 235, n.
Caiaphas, 300, 302, n.
Cain, 312.
Campbell, Lord: on royal proclamations, 26;
cited, 35.
Canada: derivation of name, 235;
first conquest of, 235, n.
Canary Islands: as a market, 182, 222;
Morton at, 342-3.
Cane, 275.
Caunoŭnicus, funeral rites of his son, 170, n.
Cape Ann: Lyford moves to, 24;
Morton at, 261.

Page 275

Cape Cod, 21, 23, 226;
French vessel wrecked on, 131, n.
Cape Verde Islands, 116, 117, n.
Carheil, Father, cited, 17.
Caribdis, 277, 280.
Cattup Keen, 137, n.
Carlisle, Earl of, 70.
Casco Bay, 221;
royalists about, 85.
Cau-ompsk, 124, n.
Cecrops, 293.
Cedars: at Mount Wollaston, 10;
where to be found large, 173;
abundance and size of, 184;
white, 185, n.
Cerberus, 294.
Chalk-stones, 216.
Champlain, lake: protection for discovery of, 77;
Morton on, 78;
Josselyn’s expedition to discover, 79;
when named, 234, n. (See Erocoise.)
Champlain: his Voyages quoted, 149, n., 150, n.;
his map, 236, n.
Charity of the Separatists, 320.
Charity, the, comes to New England in June, 1622, 7, 130.
Chauquaqock, 254, n.
Charles I.: corruption of court of, 52;
character and government of, 54;
financial straits of, in 1635, 73;
turning point in fortunes of, 78.

Page 276

Charlestown: settlement of, 34, 300, n.;
deacons of church of, 319.
Charon, 274.
Charter party, 304, 316, 317. (See Cradock, Matthew.)
Chastity, absence of, among Indians, 16, 17, 145, n.
Chelsea, 229, 300.
Cheshetue, 148.
Chestnut, the, 183.
Chickatawbut, dwelling-place of, 11;
cunning of, 162, n.;
his mother’s grave despoiled, 170, 247;
speech of, 247-9;
Weston’s men living with, 252.
Chingachgook, 213, n.
Christmas, 18, 97;
“brave gambols,” 294.
Church practices in New England, 69, 260, 262, 322-34.
Church of England: Winthrop’s detestation of, 63;
and Morton, 92;
and Lyford, 263;
dignity of, advanced in New England by Morton, 283;
Ratcliff a member of, 317.
Churching of women, 331, n.
Cicero, quoted, 139, 181, 312.
Cithyrea, 278.
Clams, 227.
Clarendon, Lord, cited, 52.
Clayton’s Virginia, cited, 199, n., 208, n., 210, n., 214, n.
Cleaves, George: Morton in employ of, 77;

Page 277

in employ of Rigby, 84;
“a fire-brand of dissension,” 85.
Clerk, Roger, 300, n.
Cockles, 227.
Coddington, Governor William, writes to Winthrop about Morton, 85.
Cod-fish, 221;
markets for, 222;
superiority of New England, ib.
Cod-liver oil, 222.
Coins, old, found at Richmond Island, 218, n.
Coke, Sir Edward, on proclamations, 26, 35.
Colchos, 292.
Commissions, system of, in favor at court of Charles I., 57.
Conies, 204, 210, 211.
Common Prayer: Book of, treatment of in Massachusetts, 69;
trouble occasioned by in Scotland, 82;
Morton’s use of, cause of his persecution, 92, 260, 283;
reference to in New Canaan, 93, 169;
an idol, 332, n.
Connecticut, Blue Laws of, 252, n.
Copper, 220.
Cormorants, 226.
Cos, 124, 217.
Cottington, Lord, 60.
Cotton, John, 98.
Council for New England: efforts of to settle the Massachusetts, 2;
grant to Robert Gorges, 3;
secures proclamation about sale of fire-arms to Indians, 20;
gives patent to Company of Massachusetts Bay, 31;

Page 278

quarrel of with Massachusetts Company, 33;
unequal to the emergency in 1634, 59;
plan for dividing territory of, 59;
divides New England, 70;
surrender of patent by, 72;
records of quoted, 130, n., 196, n.;
issues patent to Walter Bagnall, 219, n.
Court: held at Salem, 306;
at Boston, to try Morton, 311.
Cradock, Governor Matthew, 298, n.;
before Privy Council, 51, 56;
“an imposterous knave,” 62;
default of in quo warranto proceedings, 75;
on Morton, 77;
Master Charterparty 304, n., 316, 317.
Cranes, 192.
Cromwell, Oliver, 83.
Crows, 195.
Crow-blackbirds, 198.
Cupid, 278.
Cypress-trees, 185.
Cynthius, 345.

D.
Dagon, 32, n.
Davis, Captain John, 104, 118, n.
Deaconess, 323.
Deacons, 322.
Deane, Charles: cited, 30, 56;
accuracy of, 56.
Decameron, 94.

Page 279

De Costa, B. F.: quoted, 92-4;
referred to, 100.
Deer: skins of, 135, 142-3, 202;
killed by Indians, 162;
followed by scent, 166;
kinds of, 200-2;
preyed on by wolves, 204, 208;
and luzerans, 206.
Deer-traps, 202.
Deer Island, 155, n., 204, n.
Delilah, 281.
Demas, part of, 302, n.
Demophoön, 273.
Dermer, Captain Thomas: redeems captives, 131, n.;
quoted concerning pestilence of 1616, 133, n.
Devil, the: estimation of among Indians, 139, n., 150, n., 165, 167;
rules the Powows, 178.
Dexter, Rev. H. M., 244, n.
Diogenes, 178;
tub of, 286.
Dodge, General, cited, 169, n., 174, n.
“Doe, the barren,” 94, 264-6, 272-7.
Dog-fish, 223, n.
Don Quixote, 94, 272, 286.
Dorchester, Lord, 53.
Dorset, Earl of, 60.
Dover, N. H., Hiltons at, 30.
Downing, Emanuel: before Privy Council, 51;
account of, 52;

Page 280

instructed to find evidence against Morton, 88;
on humming-bird, 198, n.
Drails, 223.
Drunkenness, Indian tendency to, 174.
Ducks: kinds of, 190;
preyed on by luzeran, 206, n.
Dudley, Governor Thomas, 43, 80, 90;
cited, 4, 46.
Duxbury, 84.

E.
Eacus, 288, 293, 294, 309.
Eager, Pastor Master. (See Skelton.)
East Indies, 239.
Edmunds, Sir Thomas, 60.
Eels, 224.
Egypt, 240.
Elder-tree, the, 186.
Elders of church, 313, 322.
Elephants, their supposed religion, 141, n.
Elias house, 310.
Eliot, Dr. John, 326, n.
Eliot, John, quoted, 124, 129, n.
Elk, 200, n.
Ellis, Rev. Dr. G. E., quoted, 145, n.
Elm, the, 183.
En animia, 123.
Endicott, John: arrival of, at Salem, 31;

Page 281

visits Mt. Wollaston, 32;
occupies the Gorges grant, 34;
his instructions, 38, 40, 45;
meets “old planters,” 39, 306;
attempts to reärrest Morton, 43;
derided by Morton, 45;
mutilates royal standard, 66;
issues warrant to arrest Morton, 86;
governor, 88;
libelled in New Canaan, 88, 304;
called Littleworth, 220, 298-9, 304, 306, 308, 318;
Morton’s animosity to, 220, n.;
cured of a wife, 298, n.;
sends settlers to Charlestown, 300, n.;
at Salem, 303-7;
and the charter case, 305;
fraud imputed to, 308;
punishes Ratcliff, 316;
second marriage of, 330, n.
Epictetus, 312, n.
Episcopalians: take up Morton’s cause, 92;
in early Massachusetts, 95, 218, n.
Erocoise, lake of, 78, 234-7, 240, 241. (See Champlain.)
Esculapius, 278.
Executions. (See Hanging.)
Exercising in church, by lay members, 262, n., 322-30.

F.
Faircloath, Innocence (See Ratcliff.)
Fairfax, Lord, 83.
Falcons and falconry, 6, 196.
Falkland, Lord, 83.

Page 282

Falstaff, 278, n.
Faustus, Dr., 319.
Fire-arms: supplied to Indians, 20, 95;
trade in forbidden, 21;
in hands of Indians in 1628, 25.
Firing the country. (See Burning.)
Fish, poisonous in the tropics, 116, n.;
kinds of in New England, 221-8.
Fisheries, vessels engaged in, 221.
Fitcher: a partner of Wollaston, 4;
left in charge at Mt. Wollaston and expelled by Morton, 13.
Finch, Sir John, 35.
Flora, patroness of May-day, 19, 281.
Flounders, 226.
Flowers in New England, 228.
Footmen, running, 329.
Force’s Tracts, 99.
Foxes, 206-8.
Fox-skins, value of, 205, n., 207, n.
Franchise, the, in Massachusetts, 331, n.
Freeles, 227.
French authority, on Indians’ senses, 166.
Frenchmen, captured, among Indians, 131, n.
“Froth, Nick and,” 328, n.
Fuller, Dr. Samuel: dies of pestilence, 133, n.;
supposed to be alluded to as Eacus, 288, 291, n., 309;
note on, 297;
at Salem, 298.

Page 283

Furmety, 163, n.; 296.
Furs: profit of trade in, 22, 32;
regulation of trade in, 39;
Indian use of, 141-4;
prices of, 205, n., 207, n., 209. (See Beaver, Deer, Bear.)

G.
Galena, found in Woburn, 219, n.
Ganymede, 279.
Gardiner, Sir Christopher: before Privy Council, 50, 86;
his prefatory verses to New English Canaan, 112;
on descent of Indians, 128;
intercedes for Ratcliff, 320;
note on, 338;
adventures of, 338-42;
sonnet by, 341.
Geese: descriptions of, 189-90;
preyed on by luzeran, 206, n.
Gellius, Aulus, quoted, 312, n.
Gentry, created and degraded by Winthrop, 313.
Gerard’s Herbal, referred to, 185.
Ghent, 236.
Gibbons, Major Edward, 90-1.
Gifte, the, 44, 289.
Gloucester, Morton at, 86.
Golgotha, a new-found, 133.
Goodman, John: adventure of, with a wolf, 208, n.;
hears lions roar, 214, n.
Gookin, Daniel, quoted, 160, 174.
Gorges, Sir Ferdinando, 2, 3, 36, 47, 95;

Page 284

procures issues of proclamation on fire-arms, 21;
his curiosity as to New England, 32;
Morton ingratiates himself with, 36;
in correspondence with Morton, 41, 47;
intrigues against Massachusetts, 49;
failure in, 53;
works through Court influences, 54;
renews complaints against Massachusetts, 56;
shapes Laud’s policy to New England, 58;
his plan, 58;
to be governor-general, 59;
his influence with Lords Commissioners, 60;
represents “thorough” in New England, 60, 74;
thought to be on the New England coast in 1635, 66;
his plans in 1635, 67;
circumvents Winslow, 68;
grantee of Maine from Council for New England, 71;
appointed by King, governor-general, 71;
failure of, caused by want of money, 72;
age of, 75, n.;
death of Mason fatal to plans of, 76;
publication of New Canaan not agreeable to, 80;
pretends to be friendly to Massachusetts, 80;
“casheers” Morton, 80;
grants charter to Acomenticus, 81;
career of, 119, n.;
eulogized, 189;
Sir C. Gardiner, an agent of, 338, n.
Gorges, John: succeeds to R. Gorges’s grant, 33;
deeds land to Brereton and Oldham, 34, 40.
Gorges, Lord, 71.
Gorges, Captain Robert, 2, 33, 143, 162;
arrives in Boston Bay, 3;
extent of his grant, 3;
returns to England, 4;
validity of grant to, denied, 34;

Page 285

arrests Weston, 257, n.
Goshawks, 197.
Gover, Anna, 298.
Grant, John, 62.
Grapes in New England, 186.
Gray, Professor Asa, 182, 188.
Greek, supposed resemblance of Indian words to, 123, 126.
Greene, Charles, 99-101.
Greene, Richard, in charge of Wessagusset settlement, 7.
Greenland, excessive cold of, 118.
Grouse in New England, 194, n.

H.
“Habbe or nabbe,” 335.
Hacche, Roger atte, 300, n.
Hake, 226.
Hale, Robert, 319, n.
Halibut, 225.
Hame, 124.
Hamilton, Marquis of, 70.
Hampden, John, 83.
Handmaid, the, Morton’s voyage in, 45, 342-5.
Hanging: the Weymouth, 217, 249-52;
early in Massachusetts, 217, n.;
in Virginia, 342.
Hannibal, 263.
Hares, 204.

Page 286

Harris, Rev. Thaddeus Mason, 101, n.
Harvard University: Library bulletin referred to, 99-100;
students at, whipped, 319, n.
Hawks and falcons in New England, 195-7.
“Hawk and buzzard,” 336.
Hawthorn-trees, 186.
Heath-hen, 194, n.
Hebrew tribes, 310;
origin of Indians traced to, 129, n.
Hedgehogs, 211.
Hemlock-trees, 185, n.
Hemp in New England, 187, 202, 231.
Herbs of New England, 188, 228.
Herons, 192.
Herring, 224.
Hickory, 183, n.
Higginson, Rev. F., quoted, 213, n., 221, n., 232, n., 300, n.
Higginson, T. W., quoted, 312, n.
Hiltons, the: at Piscataqua, 23;
contribute to Morton’s arrest, 30.
“Hippeus pine-tree horse,” 284.
Holbein, Hans, 253, n.
Holland, 70, 288.
Hollis, Sir William, 253, n.
Horace, quoted, 119.
Horeb, the calf of, 278.
Horse-mackerel, 223, n.

Page 287

Howes, Edward, 317, n.
Howes, Edward, Jr., 334, n.
Hudibras, 96, 251, n., 339, n.
Hudson, Hendrick, voyages and fate of, 118, n.
Hudson, the, 236, n., 238.
Hull, so called in 1628, 24, 337, n.
Hume, David, on royal proclamations, 26.
Humfrey, John: before Privy Council, 51;
“an imposterous knave,” 62, 64;
goes to New England, 64;
Gorges refers to patience of, 80.
Humming-bird, 102, n., 198.
Hunt, Captain Thomas, 244, n.
Hutchinson, Mrs. Ann, 81, 323, n.
Hyde, Sir Nicholas, 35.
Hydra, 286, 287, 292, 293.

I.
Indians: Morton’s popularity with, 10;
number in Massachusetts, 11;
modesty of women, 16;
desire for guns and spirits, 20;
fire-arms among, 20, 25;
pestilence of 1616 among, 120, 133, n.;
origin of, 123-9;
language of, 123;
descendants of Hebrew tribes, 129, n.;
Frenchmen captives among, 131;
their wigwams, 134-8;
their eating, 137, n.;
their hospitality, 137, n.;
their games and removals, 138;

Page 288

their religion, 139-41, 167;
their dress, 141-5;
their trade, 141, 157-9;
their modesty, 142;
their children born white, 147, n.;
their bodies well shaped, 147;
color of their eyes, 148, 165;
their respect to age, 148-50;
their conjuring tricks, 150-3;
their duels, 153-4;
their money, 157-9;
their manufactures, 159;
their storehouses, 160;
their baskets, 160;
did not use salt, 161;
their cunning, 161-5;
acuteness of their senses, 165-6;
distinguish French from Spanish by smell, 166;
crimes among, 169;
their funerals, 169-71;
thievery among, 169;
their custom of firing the country, 172;
distant commerce of, 172, 220, n., 237;
contented life of, 175;
superiority to English beggars, 175-6;
utensils and method of drinking, 177;
deer-traps of, 202;
method of hunting bears, 209-10;
lobster-feasts of, 226;
belied by Plymouth people, 256;
compound theft at Wessagusset, 269;
accompany Bubble to Nipnet, 270;
return his property, 272;
witness Morton’s punishment, 312;
reprove punishment of Morton, 312. (See Massachusetts.)
Indian women: absence of chastity among, 16, 17, 145;
Morton’s relations with, 94;

Page 289

their dress, 144;
their modesty, 145;
their child-bearing, 145-8;
their care of their infants, 147.
Ireland, no venomous beasts in, 48.
Irocoise, the great lake. (See Champlain.)
Iron-stones, 219.
Iroquois, 234.
Isles of Shoals, Morton at, 29, 296, 302.
Israelites, 310;
origin of Indians traced to, 129, n., 160, n.

J.
Jackals, 207, n., 214, n.
James I., 16, 35;
sends snake-stones to Virginia, 214, n.
Jason, 292;
Golden Fleece of, 295.
Jeffreys, William: at Wessagusset, 24, 31, 162, n.;
corresponds with Gorges, 60, n.;
letters of Morton to, 61, 86;
carries letters to Winthrop, 65;
letters from quoted, 102.
Jews, origin of Indians traced to, 129, n.
Job, 281.
Johnson, Edward, 250.
Jonah, 103, 302, 327, 342-5.
Jonson, Ben, 98;
may have met Morton, 96;
note on “poem,” 290, 312, n.;
quoted, 335, n.

Page 290

Jordan, 310.
Josselyn, Captain John, quoted, 16, n., 133, n., 136, n., 137, n., 147, n.,
158, n., 160, n., 171, n., 182, n., 185, n., 189, n., 191, n., 198, n., 201,
n., 205, n., 206, n., 210, n., 212, n., 214, n., 217, n., 221, n., 232, n.,
235, n.
Josselyn, Henry, 237;
date of expedition of, to New Hampshire, 79, 238.
“Jove, let, vouchsafe to thunder,” 62, 103, 113, 345.
Jupiter, 279.

K.
Kantántowwit, 168, n.
Kennebec: Morton follows Plymouth people to the, 23, 295;
Plymouth grant on the, 36.
Kennet, White, 99.
Kytan, an Indian god, 139, n., 167, n., 168, 169.
Killock, 262.
King’s Bench, warrant did not run in Massachusetts, 47.
Kirk, David, Louis and Thomas, conquest of Canada by, 235, n.
Kodtup Kēn, 137, n.
Koüs, 124, n.

L.
Laconia, 235, 238, n.
Lannerets, 196, 198.
Larks, 195.
Latin, supposed similarity with Indian tongue, 123-6.
Laud, Archbishop William: becomes Primate, 55;
influence of, 57;
head of Lords Commissioners, 58, 60, 93, 322;

Page 291

played upon by Gorges, 64;
and Morton, 68, 93, 322-34;
New England not to be suffered to languish, 71;
supreme in England in 1635, 74;
his fortunes turn, 78;
corresponds with Burdet, 83;
orders Common Prayer to be used, 333, n.
Lazarus, 344.
Lead ore, 219.
Leadstones, 219.
Learning, vilified in New England, 282.
Leather, made by Indians, 142, 201.
Lechford’s Plaine Dealing quoted, 147, 322-34.
Lenox, Duke of, 70.
Lerna, lake, 292.
Lewis, Alonzo, quoted, 129.
Libertines, New England will not brook, 48.
Lime, 215.
Limestone in Weymouth, 216, n.
Lions in New England, 214.
Littleworth. (See Endicott.)
Lobsters, 209, 226, 265.
Lords Commissioners of Plantations: appointment of board of, 58,
100;
who composed, 60;
powers of, 60;
news of appointment of, in Massachusetts, 65;
last meeting of, 81;
Morton’s dependence on, 93;
dedication of New Canaan to, 109, 322.

Page 292

Louis XI., 326.
Lowndes’s Manual, 100.
Lucan, 141.
Luscus, 263.
Luzerans: description of, 206;
value of furs of, 205, n.
Lyford, Rev. John:
at Hull, 24, 264;
moves to Cape Ann, 24;
at Plymouth, 262-4, 332, n.
Lyman, Theodore, notes on fish, 221-8.

M.
Machiavelli, 339.
Macháug, 237, n.
Mackerel, 223.
Mackerel-shark, 223, n.
Maine: trading-stations in, 23, 218, 221;
royalists in, 85.
Maja, 281.
Manchester, Earl of, 60.
Manittóoes, 207, n.
Maple, 186.
Marble in New England, 215.
Marblehead, quality of stone at, 215, n.
Ma-re-Mount, 14. (See Merry Mount.)
Marlins, 198.
Marriage in Massachusetts, a civil contract, 69, 330.

Page 293

Mars, 292.
Martens: value of furs of, 205, n.;
described, 206.
Mary & John, arrival of at Hull, 42.
Maske, the North Star, 125.
Mason, Captain John: hostile to Massachusetts, 49;
grantee of New Hampshire from Council of New England, 71;
builds ships to take governor-general to New England, 73;
financial needs of, 74;
death of, and note on, 76, 238.
Massachusetts: latent spirit of rebellion in, in 1632, 51, 66;
emigration to, in 1634, 55;
panic in, in 1635, 66, 71;
preparations against, in 1635, 67;
church practices in, 69, 322-34;
complaints against, in 1638, 81;
appeals to king a misdemeanor in, 87;
location and advantages of, 112;
elk seen in, 200, n.;
population of, in 1632-7, 230;
baptism limited to franchise in, 331, n.;
description of community in, 334, n.;
justice in, 334-6.
Massachusetts Charter: attack on in Privy Council, in 1632, 49;
obtained by influence, 52;
sent for by Privy Council, 56;
second attack on, 58, 61;
not returned to England, 64;
plan for vacating, 67;
quo warranto proceedings to set aside, 75;
demand for return of, in 1638, 82.
Massachusetts Company: grant to, 31;
difficulty of, with Council of New England, 33;
procures charter, 34;

Page 294

“old planters,” jealousy of, 38;
instructions of, to Endicott, 38, 40, 45;
policy of, to, 39;
regulates trade in furs, 39;
complaints against, 50;
treasurer of, 305;
patent-case of, 305.
Massachusetts Indians: number of, 11;
Weston’s men killed by, 252, n.;
humanity of, 256.
Massasoit: a night in his lodge, 136, n.;
detains Samoset, 244, n.
Mather, Cotton, quoted, 129, n., 132, n., 150, n., 152, n., 160, n., 175,
n., 331, n.
Matta, 237.
Mattapan, 12, 124.
Maverick, Rev. John, 325, n.
Maverick, Samuel: says that Morton had a patent, 8;
moves from Wessagusset to Noddle’s Island, 24;
in connection with Morton’s arrest, 30;
his assessment for charge of Morton’s arrest, 30;
cited, 46;
refers to Morton’s arraignment at Boston, 88;
an Episcopalian, 94.
May, Thomas, quoted, 141, n.
Mayberry, S. P., on Walter Bagnall, 218, n.
May-day festivities: immorality of, 18;
at Mount Wollaston, 18, 276-82.
May-pole, the: of Merry-Mount, 17, 270, 295;
custom of erecting, 17;
cut down by Endicott, 32.
Medusa, 292.

Page 295

Meechin, 137.
Melpomene, 275.
Menhaden, 225, n., 226, n.
Mephistopheles, 319.
Mermaid, the, 97.
Merriam, Mr., identifies simpes as woodcock, 191, n.
Merry-Mount: fountain at, 276;
Mayday at, 276-84;
to be made a woeful mount, 278;
monster at, 282. (See Mt. Wollaston.)
Metawna, 194, n.
Mice, 214.
Milo, 270.
Milton, John, quoted, 129.
Minerals of New England, 215-21.
Ministers: ordination of, at Plymouth, 262;
at Salem, 300, n., 306;
use of notes by, 322, n.;
ordination of, in New England, 324;
superior to magistrates in New England, ib.;
first in New England, 325, n.;
absent-mindedness of a, ib.;
did not marry in New England, 330.
Ministers’ sons, whipped, 319, n.
Minos, 275, 293, 294, 309.
Mint and Cummin, tithes of, 102, 111, 280, 333.
Mittànnug, 193, n.
Mona, 124.
Monatoquit, 9, 28, 285;

Page 296

limestone near to, 216.
Money, Indian. (See Wampum.)
Monsall, Ralph, 319, n.
Monthly Anthology, 101, 320.
Moose, description and uses of, 142, 200.
Morell, Rev. William, quoted, 143, n.
Morton, Nathaniel, cited, 5.
Morton, Thomas: comes to Massachusetts with Wollaston, 1;
suspected of murder, 2, 15, 46;
his previous life, 4-5;
his acquaintance with classics, 4, 345, n.;
his first coming to New England, 6;
his silence about Wollaston, 13;
inaccuracy of, 14, 63, 96, 123, n., 335, n.;
his fondness for field sports, 15;
his treatment of Indians, 16, 256;
relations of, with Indian women, 16;
his verses, 19;
supplies Indians with guns, 20;
silence of, on subject, 21;
trades in Maine, 23;
visits Wessagusset, 24;
number of his neighbors, 25;
remonstrated with for sale of fire-arms, 25;
on proclamations, 26;
arrest of, by Standish, 27, 282-6;
escape of, 28, 283;
taken to Plymouth, 29, 296;
sent to England, 29, 289;
cost of arrest of, 30, 302;
reaches England, 31;
not proceeded against, 35, 303;
could have been proceeded against in Star Chamber, 35;
ingratiates himself with Gorges, 36;

Page 297

and Allerton, 36, 325;
good results of, 37;
returns to Plymouth, 37, 304;
to Mount Wollaston, 38;
refuses to sign agreement, 39, 307;
disregards trade regulations, 40, 308;
an agent of Gorges, 41;
profits of, 41, 308;
attempt to re-arrest, 41, 308;
re-arrest of, 43;
trial and sentence of, 44;
sent back to England, 45;
charges against him, 46;
punishment of, 46-8, 311, 312;
a warrant for his arrest from King’s Bench, 47, 311;
a “libertine,” 48;
driven away from Massachusetts, 49, 336-7;
in Exeter jail, 49;
allies himself to enemies of Massachusetts Charter, 50;
makes complaint before Privy Council, 50;
gives reason of failure of complaint, 54;
forwards more complaints, 56;
elation of, in 1634, 60;
his letters to William Jeffreys, 61;
crying as Jonas, 61, 103, 344;
plays on Laud’s foibles, 64, 93, 322-34, n., n.;
has Winslow put in Fleet prison, 69;
Solicitor of Council for New England, 72;
promptness of, in legal proceedings, 75;
on Captain John Mason, 76;
Cradock on, 77;
in pay of Cleaves, 77;
in disgrace with Gorges, 80;
witnesses Acomenticus charter, 81;
starved out of England, 83;
at Plymouth in 1643, 84;
pretends to be a Commonwealth’s man, 85;

Page 298

goes to Maine, 85;
to Rhode Island, 85;
to Boston, 86;
arraigned, 86;
extraordinary proceedings against, 87;
petition of, 88-90;
imprisonment, release and death of, 91;
a man out of place, 92;
Episcopalian defenders of, 92;
“his faults,” 93;
oppressively dealt with in Massachusetts, 94;
small literary merit of, 95;
may have met Butler and Jonson, 96;
sense of humor of, 97;
style of, 103;
at Richmond Island, 218;
uses Common Prayer, 260, 311;
at Cape Ann, 261;
at Nut Island, 268;
date of arrest, 295;
references of, to Winthrop, 310, n., 321;
gets game for settlers, 321;
at Salem, 325, n.;
at Canary Islands, 342;
his voyage to England, 342-5.
Mount Dagon, 32, 278.
Mount Wollaston: why so called, 1;
character and number of settlers at, 8, 286, 294;
description and sketch of, 9-10;
view from, 12;
location of, 15;
morals at, 17;
May-day festivities at, 18;
a refuge of runaways, 22, 23;
within grant to Massachusetts Company, 31;
destruction of house at, 45;

Page 299

Common Prayer at, 94, 283;
fountain at, 229;
monster at, 282.
Muskrats, 204;
value of skins of, 205, n.;
description of, 210.
Muscles, 227.
Munnoh, 124, n.

N.
Nan weeteo, 148, n.
Nantasket, 24, 25, 30, 325, n., 337, n.
Nanepashemet, 155.
Naumkeag, 25, 30.
Nebuchadnezzar, 116.
Necut, 193, n.
Neent, 194, n.
Neptune, 277.
Netherlands, 293.
New Canaan: political significance of, 68;
as a political pamphlet, 68, 322, n.;
reference to Lake Irocoise in, 78;
where written, 78, 233, n.;
referred to by Bradford, 79;
latest revision of, 79;
no copies of, get to New England, 79, 88;
publication of, not agreeable to Gorges, 80;
referred to by Winthrop, 86;
references to Book of Common Prayer in, 93;
ribaldry of, 94;
criticism of, 95-6;
referred to in Hudibras, 96;

Page 300

humor in, 97;
a connecting link, 98;
bibliography of, 99-101;
titlepages of, 100;
printing of, 102;
cause of errors in, 103;
rules for present edition of, 104.
New England: emigration to, in 1634, 55;
royal policy towards, 57;
church practices in, 69;
division of, in 1635, 70;
commission for governing, in 1637, 77;
location and temperature of, 120-1;
winds not violent in, 122, 232;
plenty of, 175;
air of, 177;
beauty of, 180;
motives of settlers in, 181;
no boggy ground in, 228;
perfumed air of, 228, 231-2;
superiority of, to Virginia, 228, 229, 233, 265;
natural waters of, 229;
population of, 230;
fertility of, 231;
people of, never have colds, 232;
rainfall of, 233;
coast and harbors of, ib.;
fecundity of women in, 265;
universities vilified in, 282. (See Council for New England.)
New English Canaan. (See New Canaan.)
New Hampshire, population of, in 1634, 230, n.
Newburyport: galena found in, 219, n.;
silver ore, 220, n.
Newcomein, John, 216-7.

Page 301

Niagara Falls, 236.
“Nick and Froth,” 328, n.
Nilus, 240.
Niobe, 277, 281.
Nipnets, 240, 270.
Nneesnneánna, 193, n.
Noddy, Doctor, 309.
Nokehick, 175, n.
North Star, the Indian name of, 125, n.
Northwest passage, interest in the, in 1632, 118, n., 239.
“Noses out of joint,” 94, 281.
Notes used in preaching, 322.
Nourse, H. S., on Elk in South Lancaster, Mass., 200, n.
Nowell, Increase, 305, n.
Nut Island, 268.
Nuttall’s Ornithology, cited, 194, n.

O.
Oaks in New England, 182.
Oates, Jack, 253, n.
Œdipus, 277, 280.
Oil, cod-liver, 222.
“Old Planters,” jealousy of Massachusetts Company, 38.
Oldham, John, 40;
at Hull, 24;
takes Morton to England, 29-32;
his promises of gain in New England, 32;
his scheme for trading, 33;

Page 302

does not press matters against Morton, 33, 36;
receives grant from John Gorges, 34;
tries to organize expedition, 34;
“a jack in his mood,” 40;
his treatment at Plymouth, 262-4.
Oliver le Daim, 326.
Om, 124, n.
Ordination. (See Ministers.)
Otters, value of furs of, 205, n., 206.
Ounce, the, 206, n.
Ovid, quoted, 217, 273.
Owls, 195.
Oysters, 227.

P.
Palfrey, J. G., quoted, 140, n., 148, n.
“Pan the Shepherds’ God,” 124.
Papasiquineo. (See Pasconaway.)
Parkman, Francis, quoted, 16, 17, 136, n., 140, n., 145, n., 158, n., 166,
n., 168, n., 234, n.
Partridges, 194.
Pasconaway, the sachem, 150, n.;
his tricks and incantations, 151;
his daughter’s marriage, 154-5.
Pascopan, 124.
Paskanontam, 124, n.
Passonagessit: description of, 9;
signification of name, 14, 276;
grave at, desecrated, 247;
Master Bubble at, 267;

Page 303

revels at, 276-82;
mine host, sachem of, 289. (See Mt. Wollaston.)
Pastors. (See Ministers.)
Patent of Massachusetts: granted, 31;
brought over by Endicott, 305;
its case, ib., n.
Paul’s Walk, 298, n.
Pawtucket, 124.
Peabody, W. B. O., referred to, 189, 192.
Peddock, Leonard, 130, n.
Peddock’s Island, 130, n.
Pemaquid, 244.
Penelope, 281.
Pennacook, the Bridal of, 155, n.
Pestilence among Indians in 1616-7, 11, 120, 130-4;
nature of, 133, n.;
Squanto’s fraud about, 245.
Phaethon, 293.
Phaos box, 280, 297;
explained, 345, n.
Pharsalia, May’s continuation of, quoted, 141, n.
Pheasants, 194.
Phillips, Rev. George, 326.
Phillips Creek, Weymouth, site of Wessagusset settlement, 3.
Phlegethon, 314.
Phœbus, 293.
Phyllis 273.
Pike, 227.

Page 304

Pilchers, 226.
Pillory and whetstone, 300, n.
Pine-trees, 184.
Pipe-staves as merchandise, 182.
Piscataqua, 30;
Hiltons and Thomson at, 22, 25, 255, n.
Plague. (See Pestilence.)
Plaice, 226.
Plantations, Foreign, board of Lords Commissioners of. (See Lords
Commissioners.)
Plato, Indians practise Commonwealth of, 177.
“Plough patent” in Maine, 85.
Plymouth, 30;
settlers at, in 1628, 25;
Morton carried to, 29;
Indians about destroyed by pestilence, 133, n.;
Billington hanged at, 217, n.;
population of, in 1634, 230, n.;
Samoset’s appearance at, 244;
treatment of Weston at, 245-6, 255-7;
people of, at Passonagessit 247, n.;
Morton visits, 259;
cattle at, 260;
Lyford and Oldham at, 262-4;
reordination of ministers at, 262;
no vessel arrives at, in June 1628, 289, n.;
Christmas at, 294, n.;
Morton arrives again at, 304;
ministers at, 325, n.;
Book of Common Prayer at, 332, n.
Pocahontas, “a well-featured but wanton young girl,” 145, n.
Porcupines, 211.

Page 305

Portland, Earl of, 60.
Portland Harbor, 221, n.
Potomac, the, 236, 239.
Powahs, Indian, 139, n., 150, n., 152, n.
Pratt, Phineas, cited, 131, n., 132, n.
Praying, manner of, 334.
Priapus, 94, 205, 281.
Privy Council: petition to, against Massachusetts Company, 51;
order of, stopping emigration to New England, 56, 333, n.
Proclamations, royal: about fire-arms, 20;
not law, 26;
violation of, punishable in Star Chamber, 35.
Procrustes, 335.
Proteus, 94, 281.
Purchase, Mr., cures himself of sciatica, 207, n.
Purification of women, 331.
Putnam, F. W., 131, n., 227, n.
Pygmalion, 315.
Pythagoras, 329, n.

Q.
Quacksalver, punishment of, 299.
Quail, in New England, 194.
Quebec, capture of, by Kirk, 235, n.
Quincy: seal of town of, 10;
slate in, 216, n.
Quo warranto proceedings to set aside Massachusetts Charter, 74, 77,
82, 86.

Page 306

R.
Rabbits, 204, 211.
Rabelais, 94.
Raccoon, 207.
Rasdall: a partner of Wollaston, 1;
follows him to Virginia, 13;
disappears, 15.
Ratcliff, Philip: before Privy Council, 50;
thought a lunatic, 56;
promised cropping of Winthrop’s ears, 62, 64;
called Faircloath, 316, 340;
punishment of, 316-8.
Rattlesnakes, 213;
antidotes to poison of, 213, 214, n.
Rats, 214.
Razor-shell, 227.
Readings, conjectural, 105.
Red-lead, 219.
Reordination. (See Ministers.)
Reproductions, slavishness of, 104.
Reynolds, Dr. John, 331, n.
Rhadamanthus, 293, 294, 309.
Rhode Island, Morton in, 86.
Richmond Island: Walter Bagnall at, 200, n., 218, n.;
coins found on, ib.;
whetstones at, 217;
vessels at, 221.
Rigby, Alexander, 84.
Ring, use of, in marriage, 331.

Page 307

Rogers, Mr., preacher at Plymouth, 325, n.
Running footmen, 329, n.
Rupert, Prince, 83.

S.
Sables, value of, 205, n.
Sal, Isle of, 116, n., 117, n., 343, n.
Salem: suffering at, in 1629-30, 42;
a doctor made at, 298;
Dr. Fuller at, 299;
Endicott holds a court at, 306;
ordination of ministers at, 306;
Morton at, 306, 325, n.;
church of, abused by Ratcliff, 317, n.;
church of, vilified, 317-8;
use of Common Prayer at, 332, n.
Salmon, 224.
Salt: abundance of, in tropics, 117;
use of, unknown among Indians, 161, 175, n.;
given to them by Morton, 161.
Saltonstall, Sir Richard, 43;
before Privy Council, 51, 61.
Samoset, 244, n.
Samson, 281.
Sanaconquam, an Indian god, 167.
Sanderling, 191.
Sandpiper, 191.
Sargent, Professor C. S., 182, n.
Savage, James, cited, 30, n.
Scallops, 227.

Page 308

Scent, acuteness of Indian, 166.
Sciatica, cured by raccoon grease, 207.
Scogan, John, 278;
choice of, 281.
Scotland: policy of Charles I. breaks down in, 78;
troubles of 1638 in, 82.
Scylla, 278, 280.
Sea-sickness, 298.
Sequestration, in New Canaan, 308.
Serat, 204.
Sesick, 213.
Shackles: possibly Aspinwall, 319;
whips Faircloath, 320;
fed by Morton, 321;
burns Morton’s house, 337.
Shad, 225.
Shakespeare, William, 98.
Shawmut, 12.
Shaler, Professor N. S., notes by, 215-20.
Shell-heaps: at Cotuit, 131, n.;
origin of, 226, n.
Ships, number of engaged in fisheries, 221.
Shoals, Isles of, 29, 289, 296, 302.
Shrimpe, Captaine. (See Standish.)
Silver in New England, 220, n.
Simpes, 191.
Skelton, Rev. Samuel, 39, 300, n., 325, n.;
called Eager, 306.

Page 309

Slafter, Rev. E. F., quoted, 234, n.
Slate: in Quincy and Weymouth, 216, n.;
at Richmond Island, 217, n.
Smart, Captain, brings over falcons to the king, 196, n.
Smelts, 225.
Smith, John, 95;
quoted, 1, n., 136, n., 144, n., 147, n., 150, n.
Smith, Ralfe, 325, n.
Snakes, 212.
Snipes, 191.
Socrates, quoted, 327.
Solomon: sayings of, quoted, 119, 127, 228;
referred to, 184.
Sommers, Will, 253.
South Lancaster, Mass., elks in, 200, n.
South Sea, 239.
“Sparke,” 160.
Sparrow-hawks, 198.
Spruce-trees, 185.
Squanto, 271, n.;
made use of by Chickatawbut, 164;
kidnapped, 244, n.
Squanto’s Chappel: chalkstones at, 216;
fountain at, 229.
Squantum, 12, 216, 229;
slate at, 216, n.
Squidraket, Sagamore, 218, n.
Squirrels, 212.

Page 310

St. Michaels, 343.
St. Paul’s Church, 298.
Stam, Jacob Frederick, 100.
Standish, Miles: kills Indians at Wessagusset, 11;
sent to arrest Morton, 27;
threatens to shoot him, 29, 296;
takes offence at Morton, in 1643, 84;
at Wessagusset, 247, n.;
Captain Shrimpe, 285-7, 291, n., 296;
a quondam drummer, 286;
called Minos, 291, n.
Star Chamber, court of, 35.
Stenography, 266.
Sterling, Earl of, 70.
Stones, chapter on, 215-20.
Strachey, Edward, quoted, 145, n., 147, n., 208, n., 210, n., 215, n.
Strafford, Earl of, 60, 74.
Stubbs, his Anatomy of Abuses cited, 18.
Students of Harvard College, whipped, 319, n.
Sturgeon, 223.
Styx, 293, 314.
Swan, the, Weston’s vessel, 257, n.
Swans, 189.
Swift, Lindsay, quoted, 328, n., 335, n., 345, n.

T.
Tantoquineo, 152.
Tartars, supposed descent of Indians from, 125.
Tassell gentles, 196-7.

Page 311

Teal, kinds of, in New England, 190.
Temperwell, Joshua. (See Winthrop, John.)
Thomson, David: at Piscataqua, 24;
moves to Boston Bay, 24;
on origin of Indians, 128;
authorities concerning, 128.
“Thorough,” Gorges policy, the New England branch of, 60, 74.
Tin, in New England, 220.
Titta, 148.
Tithes, 333.
Tornadoes, 217.
Trade with Indians, liquor the life of, 20, 174. (See Fire-arms.)
Trade: profits of in New England, 32;
regulations of Massachusetts Company, 39;
disregarded by Morton, 40, 306, 308.
Trade-winds, effect of, 118.
Traps, to take deer, 202.
Trees: effect of burning underbrush on, 172;
where to look for large, 172;
of New England, 182-7.
Triton, 281.
Trojans, supposed descent of Indians from the, 126-7, 129.
Trout, 227.
Trumbull, J. Hammond: on name of Passonagessit, 14;
notes by, on Indian words, 123, 124, 137, 148, 160, 167, 229;
his notes to Plaine Dealing referred to, 322-34.
Turbot, 225.
Turkeys: garments made of feathers of, 142, 144, n.;
hunted by Indians, 162;

Page 312

wild, in New England, 192.
Turtledoves, 180.
Tuttle, C. W., 238, n.

U.
Universities, vilified in New England, 281-2.
Uttaquatock, 216.

V.
Venice, 281.
Venus, 265, 315, 345.
Vermilion, 219.
Virgil, quoted, 217, 260, 345.
Virginia: prices of furs in, in 1650, 205, n.;
wolves in, 208, n.;
corn not planted in, 225;
inferiority of, to New England, 228, 229, n., 233, 265;
the “barren doe” of, 264, 276;
population of, 265;
execution in, 342.

W.
Walnut, the, 183.
Wampum, 157-9, 301.
Wampumpeack. (See Wampum.)
Warham, Rev. John, 322, n., 325, n.
Warwick, Earl of, had no influence at Court, 52.
Washburne, John, 305, n.
Walford, Thomas: moves from Wessagusset to Mishawum, 24;
an Episcopalian, 94.

Page 313

Wessagusset: plantations at, 2, 246;
Robert Gorges at, 3;
dispersion of his settlement, 4;
Indians killed at, by Standish, 11, 247, n.;
locality of, 12;
separation of settlers at, in 1628, 24;
Morton arrested at, 27, 282, 290, n.;
Episcopalians, 95;
those dwelling at, 162, n.;
muscle-bank at, 227;
skirmish at, 247;
the hanging at, 249-51;
settlers killed at, 253-4;
Lyford at, 264;
Morton at, in winter, 268;
Indians compound theft at, 269;
bring Bubble’s things to, 271. (See Weymouth.)
Weston, Andrew: comes to New England in Charity, 7;
takes an Indian boy back to England, 130, n.;
date of his voyage, 130, n.
Weston, Thomas: establishes a plantation at Wessagusset, 2;
account of, 245-6;
his men killed by Indians, 252;
comes to New England, 255-7;
treatment of, 257-9, 261.
Wethercock, Mr., 337, 342-3.
Weymouth, 2;
slate and limestone in, 216, n. (See Wessagusset.)
Whetstones, 124, 216;
at Richmond Island, 217;
punishment of pillory and, 299, n. (See Cos.)
Whipping-post, 274, 319, n.
White, William and Susannah, 330, n.
Whitney, Professor J. D., on Isle of Sal and poisonous fish, 116.

Page 314

Whitney, George, quoted, 101.
Whittier, J. G., 155, n.
Widgeon, 191.
Widow, the, 323. (See Deaconess.)
Wiggin, Thomas: cited in regard to Morton, 5;
before Privy Council, 52;
quoted, 320, n.
Wigwams, described, 134-8.
Wildrake, 92.
Williams, Edward, quoted, 182, n.
Williams, Roger, quoted, 16, 17, 124, n., 125, n., 136, n., 137, n., 146,
n., 149, n., 158, n., 159, n., 168, n., 171, n., 194, n., 202, n., 207, n.,
221, n., 232, n.
Willis, William, 218, n.
Wilson, Rev. John, 325, n.
Winnisimmet, 25, 30, n., 300, n., 301;
origin of name of, 229, n.;
fountain at, 229, 265.
Winnepurkitt, the marriage of, 155.
Winslow, Governor Edward, 95;
quoted, 16, 125, n., 140, n., 145, n., 149, n.;
sent to England in 1634, 64;
sails, 65;
reaches London, 67;
petitions Lords Commissioners, 68;
put in Fleet prison, 69, 322, n.;
describes Morton at Plymouth in 1648, 84;
goes on mission to Massasoit, 136, n.;
marriage of, 330, n.
Winsor, Justin, 99.
Winthrop, Governor John, 43, 81, 95;

Page 315

arrival of, in New England, 42, 310;
imposes sentence on Morton, 44, 311;
has warrant for Morton’s arrest, 47, 311;
criticism of, on complaint to Privy Council, 50;
rejoices over failure of complaint, 53;
“King Winthrop,” 63;
receives letter of Morton to Jeffreys, 65;
Gorges refers to patience of, 80;
excuses not sending out charter in 1638, 83;
on arrest of Morton in 1644, 86;
quoted, 91, 150, n., 218, n., 230, n.;
absence of humor in, 98;
course towards Bagnall, 218, n.;
called Joshua, 301;
referred to as Temperwell, 302, 310, 314, 318, 320, 335, 340;
degrades gentry, 313;
has Ratcliff whipped, 320;
responsible for wants of settlement, 321;
upon civil marriages, 330, n.;
on Book of Common Prayer, 332, n.;
methods of, as judge, 334-6;
course towards Sir C. Gardiner, 340.
“Without, them that are,” 316, 321, 332.
Woburn: galena found in, 219;
silver ore, 220, n.
Wollaston, facts concerning name of, 1, n. (See Mount Wollaston.)
Wollaston, Captain: settles at Massachusetts, 1;
composition of his company, 4;
leaves Massachusetts, 12;
sells his servants in Virginia, 13;
tradition as to death of, 15.
Wolves: deer persecuted by, 203;
black, value of furs of, 207, n., 209;
description of, 208-9.

Page 316

Wonder-Working Providence, quoted, 94, 300, n.
Wood, William, 217.
Woodcock, 191, n.
Woodman, “Auld,” 216.
Wood’s Prospect: quoted, 16, 95, 129, 137, n., 138, n., 139, n., 140, n.,
143, n., 150, n., 160, n., 168, n., 184, n., 186, n., 189, n., 191, n., 192,
n., 198, n., 200, n., 206, n., 208, n., 210, n., 213, n., 223, n., 224, n.,
230, n., 238, n.;
referred to, 139, 141, 154, 172, 182, n., 184, n., 200, n., 217, 221, n.,
233;
when written, 233.
Worcester: black-lead found in, 219, n.;
country of Nipnets, 240, n.
Wotawquenauge, 254.
Wrentham, black-lead found in, 219, n.
Wrington, Samuel Fuller born in, 298.
Wunanumau, 123.

Y.
York, Archbishop of, 60.
York, Maine. (See Acomenticus.)

Z.
Zones, the: New England, how placed in, 115-22;
Aristotle’s theory of, 117.

Page 317

Council of the Prince Society.
1883.
EDMUND F. SLAFTER.
JOHN WARD DEAN.
WILLIAM B. TRASK.
CHARLES H. BELL.
JOHN MARSHALL BROWN.
HENRY W. FOOTE.
DAVID GREENE HASKINS, Jr.
ELBRIDGE H. GOSS.

Page 318

FOOTNOTES

[1] Bradford, pp. 235-6.

[2] A Captain Wolliston is mentioned by Smith
(Description of New England, iii. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. vi.
p. 136) as the lieutenant of “one Captain Barra, an English
pirate, in a small ship, with some twelve pieces of
ordnance, about thirty men and near all starved,” whom
Smith encountered in 1615, while a captive in the hands of
the French freebooters. Though it has found a place in
biographical dictionaries on account of two eminent men of
one family from Staffordshire who bore it, the name of
Wollaston is rarely met with. It is not found, for instance, in
the present directories of either Boston or New York, and
but twice in that of Philadelphia. It has been given to
islands in both the Arctic and the Antarctic oceans, but the
family to which it belonged seems to have originated in an
inland English county. (Lower’s Patronymica Britannica).
The Captain, or Lieutenant, Wolliston, therefore, whom
Smith fell in with in 1615 may have been, and probably
was, the same who ten years later gave his name to the hill
on Quincy Bay. It is not likely that two Captain Wollastons
were sea-adventurers at the same time. That it actually was
the same man is, however, matter of pure surmise.

[3] Bradford, p. 154.

[4] Infra, *44, *124-127, *138.

[5] Young’s Chron. of Mass., p. 321.

Page 319

[6] N. E. Memorial, p. 160.

[7] iii. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. viii. p. 323.

[8] Infra, *13, *71, 343, note.

[9] Palfrey, vol. i. p. 401, n.

[10] Bradford, p. 236.

[11] Infra, *17, 130, note 2, *59.

[12] Bradford, p. 118.

[13] Bradford, p. 120.

[14] Young’s Chron. of Pl., p. 299.

[15] Infra, *60.

[16] Infra, *113-118.

[17] Palfrey, vol. i. p 397.

[18] Lowell Inst. Lectures of Mass. Hist. Soc. 1869, p. 147.
Samuel Maverick, however, writing to Lord Clarendon in
the year 1661, asserts that Morton had a patent. Coll. N. Y.
Hist. Soc. 1869, p. 40.

[19] Palfrey (vol. i. p. 222) speaks of it as “a bluff.” This is
an error. The slope from where Morton’s house stood to the
water is very gradual.

Page 320

[20] Young’s Chron. of Mass., p. 395.

[21] Infra, *51, 106.

[22] Young’s Chron. of Mass., p. 305.

[23] This View of Mount Wollaston is taken from Rev. Dr.
William P. Lunt’s Two Discourses on Occasion of the Two
Hundredth Anniversary of the Gathering of the First
Congregational Church, Quincy, (p. 37). It represents the
place very accurately as it appeared in 1840, and as it is
supposed to have appeared from the time of the first
settlement until recently. The single tree was a lofty red-
cedar, which must have been there when Wollaston landed,
as it was a large tree of a long-lived species, and died from
age about 1850. The trunk is still (1882) standing; and,
though all the bark has dropped off, it measures some 66
inches in circumference. The central part of the above cut,
including the tree, has been adopted as a seal for the town
of Quincy, with the motto “Manet.”

[24] Infra, *115-18.

[25] Infra, *59.

[26] Infra, *114.

[27] Bradford, pp. 236-7.

[28] Infra, *103, *117.

[29] Infra, *141-9.

Page 321

[30] Morton uniformly speaks of the place as Ma-re-Mount,
and John Adams on this point commented in his notes as
follows:—“The Fathers of Plymouth, Dorchester,
Charlestown, &c., I suppose would not allow the name to
be Ma-re-Mount, but insisted upon calling it Merry-Mount,
for the same reason that the common people in England
will not call gentlemen’s ornamental grounds gardens, but
insist upon calling them pleasure-grounds, i. e., to excite
envy and make them unpopular.”
Ma-re-Mount, however, was a characteristic bit of Latin
punning on Morton’s part, designed to tease his more
austere neighbors. He himself says (Infra, *132): “The
inhabitants of Passonagessit, having translated the name of
their habitation from that ancient salvage name to Ma-re-
Mount ... the precise seperatists that lived at New
Plimmouth stood at defiance with the place threatening to
make it a woefull mount and not a merry mount.” (Infra,
*134.) In view of the situation of the place, Ma-re-Mount
was a very appropriate name, but it may well be questioned
whether it was ever so called by any human being besides
Morton, or by him except in print. Bradford calls it Merie-
mounte. (p. 237.) The expression used by Morton, that they
“translated the name” from Passonagessit to Ma-re-Mount,
would naturally suggest that the Indian name might find its
equivalent in the Latin one, and mean simply “a hill by the
sea.” On this point, however, J. Hammond Trumbull writes:
“Morton’s ‘Passonagessit’ has been a puzzle to me every
time it has caught my eye since I first marked it twenty
years ago or more with double (??). Morton, as he shows in
chap. ii. of book i., could not write the most simple Indian
word without a blunder. What may have been the name he
makes ‘Passonagessit’ we cannot guess, unless it survives
in some early record. There is no trace of ‘sea,’ or ‘water,’
or ‘mount’ in it. If it stands for Pasco-naig-és-it, it means
‘at [a place] near the little point,’ but I know so little of the
local topography that I hesitate to suggest this

Page 322

interpretation.” The rendering here suggested by Dr.
Trumbull does apply sufficiently well to the locality. Mount
Wollaston is a part of the neck which connects the
peninsulas locally known in Quincy as Germantown and
Hough’s Neck with the mainland.

[31] Bradford, p. 253.

[32] Whitney’s Hist. of Quincy, p. 18.

[33] Infra, *55.

[34] Josselyn says of the “Indesses,” as he calls them, “All
of them are of a modest demeanor, considering their savage
breeding; and indeed do shame our English rusticks whose
rudeness in many things exceedeth theirs.” (Two Voyages,
pp. 12, 45.) When the Massachusets Indian women, in
September, 1621, sold the furs from their backs to the first
party of explorers from Plymouth, Winslow, who wrote the
account of that expedition, says that they “tied boughs
about them, but with great shamefacedness, for indeed they
are more modest than some of our English women are.”
(Mourt, p. 59.) See also, to the same effect, Wood’s
Prospect, (p. 82.) It suggests, indeed, a curious inquiry as to
what were the customs among the ruder classes of the
British females during the Elizabethan period, when all the
writers agree in speaking of the Indian women in this way.
Roger Williams, for instance, referring to their clothing,
says: “Both men and women within doores, leave off their
beasts skin, or English cloth, and so (excepting their little
apron) are wholly naked; yet but few of the women but will
keepe their skin or cloth (though loose) neare to them,
ready to gather it up about them. Custome hath used their
minds and bodies to it, and in such a freedom from any
wantonnesse that I have never seen that wantonnesse

Page 323

amongst them as, (with griefe) I have heard of in Europe.”
(Key, pp. 110-11.) And he adds, “More particular:
“Many thousand proper Men and Women,
I have seen met in one place:
Almost all naked, yet not one
Thought want of clothes disgrace.”
In Parkman’s Jesuits in North America (ch. iv.) there is a
very graphic account of the missionary Le Jeune’s
experience among the Algonquins, in which he describes
the interior of the wigwam on a winter’s evening. “Heated
to suffocation, the sorcerer, in the closest possible approach
to nudity, lay on his back, with his right knee planted
upright and his left leg crossed on it, discoursing volubly to
the company, who, on their part, listened in postures
scarcely less remote from decency.” Le Jeune says, “Les
filles et les jeunes femmes sont à l’exterieur tres
honnestement couvertes, mais entre elles leurs discours
sont puants, comme des cloaques;” and Parkman adds,
“The social manners of remote tribes of the present time
correspond perfectly with Le Jeune’s account of those of
the Montagnais.” See also Voyages of Champlain, Prince
Soc., vol. iii. pp. 168-70.

[35] Parkman says that “chastity in women was recognized
as a virtue by many tribes.” (Jesuits in North America, p.
xxxiv.) Of the New England Indians Williams remarks,
—“Single fornications they count no sin, but after marriage
then they count it heinous for either of them to be false.”
(Key, p. 138.) Judging by an incident mentioned by Morton,
however, adultery does not seem to have been looked upon
as a very grave offense among the Indians of the vicinity in
which he lived. (Infra, *32.) On the general subject of
morality among young Indian women, especially in the
vicinity of trading-posts, see Parkman’s Jesuits in North
America (pp. xxxiv, xlii) and the letter from Father Carheil

Page 324

to the Intendant Champigny, in The Old Régime in Canada
(p. 427).

[36] Infra, *135.

[37] i. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. iii. p. 62.

[38] iv. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. iv. p. 478.

[39] Hazlitt’s Popular Antiquities of Great Britain, p. 121.
See also on this subject, Strutt’s Sports and Pastimes, p.
352.

[40] Infra, *132-7.

[41] Bradford, p. 237.

[42] Bradford, p. 238.

[43] iii. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. vi, p. 70. See also note 202 in
Trumbull’s ed. of Lechford’s Plaine Dealing, p. 117.

[44] Bradford, p. 240.

[45] Infra, *78, 218, n.

[46] Infra, *137.

[47] Bradford, p. 204.

[48] Ib. p. 233.

[49] Infra, *149.

Page 325

[50] Mem. Hist. of Boston, vol. i. p. 83.

[51] Infra, *124.

[52] Infra, *181.

[53] i. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. iii, pp. 63, 64.

[54] Bradford, p. 241.

[55] xii. Coke, p. 75.

[56] Hist. of England (Edition of Harper Bros.) vol. iv. p.
280.

[57] Lives of the Chief Justices, vol. i. p. 283. See also a
paper on “Royal Proclamations,” in Disraeli’s Curiosities of
Literature (ed. 1863), vol. iii., p. 371.

[58] Bradford, p. 241-2.

[59] Infra, *137-43.

[60] i. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. iii. pp. 63-4.

[61] Infra, *150.

[62] Infra, *144, 155.

[63] The letters in full are in Bradford’s Letter-Book, iii.
Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. iii. pp. 62-4.

Page 326

[64] The names of neither Maverick nor Walford appear in
this list, though in his history Bradford especially mentions
Winnisimmet (p. 241) as one of the places the settlers at
which contributed to the charge. They may, as Savage
suggests, (Winthrop, vol. i. p. *43 n.) have been included
with Blackstone, though, considering what Maverick’s
means were, this does not seem probable. Edward Hilton
lived at Dover, eight miles above Piscataqua. (Young’s
Chron. of Mass., p. 315. Proc. of Mass. Hist. Soc. 1875-6,
pp. 362-8.) Mr. Deane suggests that Little Harbor, the place
formerly occupied by Thomson, was meant by Piscataqua.
(Ib., 368.) The locality of Bursley and Jeffreys greatly
confused the authorities for a time, but it no longer seems
open to question. (Proc. of Mass. Hist. Soc. 1878, p. 198.)

[65] Hazard, vol. i. p. 243.

[66] Bradford, p. 238; Infra, *134. Dagon was the sea-god
of the Philistines, upon the occasion of whose feast, at
Gaza, Samson pulled down the pillars of the temple.
Judges, xvi.

[67] Palfrey, vol. i. p. 79.

[68] Oldham’s “vast conceits of extraordinary gain of three
for one” afterwards caused “no small distraction” to the
sober-minded governor and assistants of the Massachusetts
Company. Young’s Chron. of Mass., p. 147.

[69] iii. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. vi. p. 80.

[70] Young’s Chron. of Mass., p. 171; Hutchinson, vol. i. p.
6.

Page 327

[71] Young’s Chron. of Mass., p. 147.

[72] Bradford, p. 243.

[73] Infra, *156.

[74] Supra, p. 26.

[75] xii. Coke, p. 76.

[76] Campbell’s Chief Justices, vol. ii. p. 42.

[77] Campbell’s Lord Chancellors, vol. iii. p. 256.

[78] Bradford, p. 237.

[79] Bradford, p. 250.

[80] Infra, *157.

[81] Bradford, p. 252.

[82] i. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. iii. p. 63.

[83] Young’s Chron. of Mass., p. 145.

[84] Infra, *158-9.

[85] Hazard, vol. i. p. 252.

[86] Young’s Chron. of Mass., pp. 96, 148.

Page 328

[87] Infra, *119.

[88] Winthrop, vol. i. p. *57.

[89] Infra, *160.

[90] Infra, *161.

[91] Young’s Chron. of Mass., p. 311.

[92] Winthrop, vol. i. p. *30.

[93] Records, vol. i. p. 74.

[94] Infra, *163.

[95] Records, vol i. p. 75.

[96] Infra, *163.

[97] Coll. of N. Y. Hist. Soc. (1869), p. 42.

[98] Infra, *186-7.

[99] Young’s Chron. of Mass., p. 321; Proc. Mass. Hist.
Soc., 1860-2, p. 133.

[100] Bradford, p. 253.

[101] Winthrop, vol. i. p. *57.

[102] Morton says (Infra, *163) “the Snare must now be
used; this instrument must not be brought by Iosua

Page 329

[Winthrop] in vaine.”

[103] Mass. Hist. Soc., Lowell Inst. Lectures (1869), p.
377.

[104] i. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. i. p. 250.

[105] Bradford, p. 253.

[106] Mem. Hist. of Boston, vol. i. p. 336.

[107] Winthrop, vol. i. p. *102.

[108] Palfrey, vol. i. p. 391.

[109] Bradford, pp. 251-2.

[110] Clarendon’s Rebellion, B. iii. § 27; B. vi. § 404.

[111] Winthrop. vol. i. p. *100. Downing sent a detailed
account of the hearing, now lost, to Winthrop; see
Hutchinson, vol. ii. p. 2.

[112] iv. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. vi. p. 33, n.

[113] Palfrey, vol. i. p. 392.

[114] Bradford, p. 297.

[115] Winthrop, vol. ii. p. *190.

[116] Mem. Hist. of Boston, vol. i. p. 338.

Page 330

[117] iii. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. vi. p. 80.

[118] Mem. Hist. of Boston, vol. i. p. 338. The reference
here, as at some other places, is to Deane’s chapter on “The
Charter of King Charles I.” As a rule, in works of this
description, dealing with the sources of history, it is not
permissible to refer to contemporaneous authorities. Mr.
Deane, however, so far as New England history is
concerned, may fairly be made an exception to this rule.
His knowledge is so exhaustive and his accuracy so great
that a reference to him I consider just as good and as
permissible as a reference to the original authorities.

[119] Winthrop, vol. i. p. *56, n.

[120] Palfrey, vol. i. pp. 391-3.

[121] Briefe Narration, iii. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. vi. p. 82.
Hazard, vol. i. p. 390-4.

[122] Proc. of Amer. Antiq. Soc., 1867, p. 124. Winthrop,
vol. ii. p. 233. Hazard, vol. i. p. 347.

[123] Hazard, vol. i. p. 347.

[124] William Jeffreys was one of the Robert Gorges
Company. He had contributed to the cost of arresting
Morton in 1628 and sending him to England. Morton, in
writing to him, could not but have been aware of this; but
not improbably, during the time of his return to Mount
Wollaston in 1630, he had seen more of Jeffreys, and found
that he too, like the rest of the “old planters,” looked on the
Massachusetts Company with jealousy and apprehension.
At that time, indeed, Jeffreys was in active correspondence
with Gorges, and outspoken in his complaints. (iv. Mass.

Page 331

Hist. Coll., vol. vi. p. 3.) Hence the familiarity of the
address. It is apparent from the letter, however, that
Morton, when he wrote it, was so sure of his position and
so elated with a sense of his own importance that he could
not contain himself. He could not resist the desire to let his
old acquaintances in America know what an important
personage he had become, and he probably hoped they
would show the letter to Winthrop and every one else. It
was a childish outbreak of delight and vanity.

[125] There is some confusion about these dates. The letter
itself is dated the 1st of May, and the commission is here
said on that day to have passed the great seal. The
commissioners may have designated Gorges as governor-
general at this time, and ordered a commission as such to
be at once made out to him; but a year later the King’s
intention of appointing him was formally announced.
(Proc. of Amer. Antiq. Soc., 1867, p. 120.) The probability
is that the business relating to the colonies was regarded as
of little moment and done in the most careless and irregular
way, hardly a record even of it being kept. Some
proceedings were thus begun and not carried out, and other
things were done twice.

[126] Morton is here quoting from the New Canaan, (p.
*188) and its very last page. It would seem, therefore, now
to have been written, though it was not published until three
years later. (See Infra, pp. 78-9.)

[127] Supra, pp. 44-5.

[128] This letter is in Hubbard, pp. 428-30 (ii. Mass. Hist.
Coll., vol. vi.), and in Winthrop, vol. ii. pp. *190-1. The
readings do not materially differ, but the punctuation has
been corrected and the spelling is modern.

Page 332

[129] Mem. Hist. of Boston, vol. i. p. 379, n.

[130] Winthrop, vol. i. p. *137.

[131] Winthrop, vol. i. p. *143.

[132] Ib., vol i. p. *102.

[133] Autobiography of Sir Simonds D’Ewes, vol. ii. p. 118.

[134] Winthrop, vol. i. p. *172.

[135] Infra, pp. *172-9.

[136] Bradford, pp. 329-30.

[137] Supra, p. 66. Winthrop, vol. i. p. *157.

[138] Palfrey, vol. i. p. 401 n. Mem. Hist. of Boston, vol. i.
p. 341.

[139] Winthrop, vol. i. p. *161, *187.

[140] Palfrey, vol. i. p. 403. Mem. Hist. of Boston, vol. i. p.
343.

[141] In January, 1640, Richard Vines wrote to Governor
Winthrop, of Sir Ferdinando, that he was then “nere 80
yeares ould.” (iv. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. vii. p. 342.) This
can hardly be correct, however, as subsequently he served
on the royal side in the civil wars, and was among the
prisoners taken by Fairfax when he stormed Bristol in
September, 1645. (iii. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. iii. p. 342.) He
must, however, have then been a very old man, as fifty-four

Page 333

years before, in 1591, he had distinguished himself at the
siege of Rouen, in Essex’s English contingent. (Devereux’s
Earls of Essex, vol. i. p. 271).

[142] Infra, *98.

[143] See further on this subject, Winthrop, vol. i. pp. *161,
*187; which is also referred to in the same work, vol. ii. p.
*12.

[144] Hazard, vol. i. p. 400.

[145] iv. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. vi. p. 127.

[146] Winthrop, vol. i. p. *231.

[147] iv. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. vii. p. 330.

[148] Infra, *96-100.

[149] Supra, 62, n.

[150] Infra, *98.

[151] Winthrop, vol. i. p. *137.

[152] Bradford, p. 254.

[153] iii. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. vi. p. 81.

[154] Winthrop, vol. ii. p. *12.

[155] iv. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. vii. p. 331.

Page 334

[156] Hazard, vol. i. p. 474.

[157] Hutchinson’s State Papers, p. 106.

[158] Winthrop, vol. i. p. *264.

[159] Winthrop, vol. i. p. *266.

[160] Winthrop, vol. i. p. *269.

[161] Ib., p. *298.

[162] Bradford, p. 375.

[163] iv. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. vi. p. 175.

[164] Supra, p. 77.

[165] See Mr. Deane’s note on the “Plough patent,” in iv.
Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. vii. pp. 88-96. Also the note on
Cleaves, Ib. p. 363. D’Israeli (Curiosities of Literature, vol.
iii. p. 488) gives a singular anecdote of Rigby.

[166] iv. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. vii. p. 343.

[167] iv. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. vi. p. 148.

[168] Palfrey, vol. ii. p. 147, n.

[169] Winthrop, vol. ii. p. *189.

[170] Supra, 61-3.

Page 335

[171] Winthrop, vol. i. p. *298.

[172] N. Y. Hist. Soc. Coll., 1869, p. 40.

[173] Records, vol. ii. p. 90.

[174] Hist. of New England, vol. ii. p. 225.

[175] Infra, *138.

[176] Winthrop, vol. ii. p. *192.

[177] New York Hist. Soc. Coll., 1869, p. 40.

[178] “It is undeniable that Morton became an object of
aversion largely for the reason that he used the Prayer
Book.” (Mag. of Amer. Hist., vol. viii. p. 83.)

[179] White’s Memoirs of the Protestant Episcopal Church,
p. xxii. n. See also Oliver’s Puritan Commonwealth, pp.
37-9.

[180] Infra, *138. See, also, *50, 332, note 2.

[181] Mag. of Amer. Hist., vol. viii. p. 89.

[182] Wonder-Working Providence, p. 30.

[183] “Such a rake as Morton, such an addle-headed fellow
as he represents himself to be, could not be cordial with the
first people from Leyden, or with those who came over
with the patent, from London or the West of England. I can
hardly conceive that his being a Churchman, or reading his
prayers from a Book of Common Prayer, could be any great

Page 336

offence. His fun, his songs and his revels were provoking
enough, no doubt. But his commerce with the Indians in
arms and ammunition, and his instructions to those savages
in the use of them, were serious and dangerous offences,
which struck at the lives of the new-comers, and threatened
the utter extirpation of all the plantations.” (Notes of John
Adams, 1802.)

[184] Infra, 249-52, and note.

[185] Infra, 290, note.

[186] Winthrop, vol. ii. p. *14.

[187] Winthrop, vol. ii. p. *166.

[188] See Deane’s note to Bradford, p. 254.

[189] Harvard Univ. Library Bulletin, No. 10, p. 244.

[190] Supra, pp. 78-9.

[191] Mag. of Amer. Hist., vol. viii. p. 94, n.

[192] Mr. DeCosta says that the titlepage of the copy in the
Library of the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel
reads in this way. Mag. of Amer. Hist., vol. viii. p. 94, n. 4.

[193] This copy was in the Adams Library for many years,
and until within a quite recent period. It cannot, however,
now (1882) be found. It would appear to have been stolen,
together with many other volumes and almost innumerable
autographs, which formerly lent a peculiar value to the

Page 337

John Adams Collection, given by him in 1822 to the town
of Quincy.

[194] “Mint and cumin” uniformly appears as “muit and
cummin;” “humming-bird” as “hunning-bird.”

[195] Ante, pp. 61-3.

[196] In regard to the Board of Lords Commissioners of
1634, see supra, 57-60. The royal letter patent in the
original Latin is in Hazard, vol. i. pp. 344-7. There are
translations of it in Hubbard (pp. 264-8) and in Bradford
(pp. 456-8), together with notes by Harris in his edition of
the former, and by Deane in the latter.

[197] [seth.] Wherever in this edition an apparently obvious
misprint in the text of 1637 has been, as in the present case,
corrected, the misprinted word, as it appears in the original,
is printed between brackets as a foot-note.

[198] In regard to Sir Christopher Gardiner, see infra,
*182-4 and note.

[199] [Connick.] See supra, 111, note 1.

[200] [stife.]

[201] [muit.]

[202] The Isle of Sall appears on the map in the Geography
of Peter Heylyn, London, 1674, as one of the Cape Verde
Islands. It is called in the text Insula Salis, and on other old
maps Isle of Sal, or Ilha do Sal. There are some ten islands
in the group. Professor J. D. Whitney writes that several
islands are known by the name of Sall, and that the one

Page 338

referred to by Morton is probably that off the north shore of
Cuba. “A good deal has been written about the poisonous
fishes of the waters about the island of Cuba. The disease
produced by eating poisonous fish is called ciguatera, and
the fish itself is said to be ciguato. All that is definitely
known about the matter seems to be that quite a large
number of species of fish in that region are believed to be
liable to some disease, the nature and course of which is
unknown; and that those who eat the fish thus diseased are
themselves liable to be attacked by the malady called
ciguatera.”

[203] Morton here apparently refers at second hand to
Aristotle’s resumé of the ancient belief of five zones, two
only of which were habitable. Meteorologica, B. II. ch. v. §
11.

[204] From this passage it would appear that the Isle of Sall
and the tropical waters, which Morton in this chapter refers
to as having been visited by him, were in the neighborhood
of the Western and Cape Verde Islands. In his time the word
tornado had probably not been adopted into the English
language, and in writing it Morton gives to the letter d the
peculiar Western Island or Portuguese pronunciation.

[205] Morton here confounds Davis with Hudson. Davis’s
three voyages were made in 1585-6-7, and it was in the first
of them that he discovered the straits which bear his name.
He afterwards made five voyages to the East Indies, in the
last of which he was killed in a fight with some Japanese on
the coast of Malacca. Hudson made four voyages between
1607 and 1610, during the last of which he passed a winter,
frozen in, near the entrance to Hudson Bay. His crew
mutinied, and turned him adrift in an open boat, on the 22d
of July, 1610. He was never heard of again; and it is his
“fate,” probably, which Morton had in mind. No other

Page 339

noted discoverer of the Northwest Passage was lost prior to
1634. The discovery of that passage, however, then excited
as active an interest as it has since, or does now. In 1632
Edward Howes sent out to Governor Winthrop a printed
“Treatise of the North-West Passage” (iv. Mass. Hist. Coll.,
vol. vi. p. 480) which is still in the library of the
Massachusetts Historical Society.

[206] The phrase in the Meteorologica (ubi supra, 117, note
1.) is, “the parts under the Bear (i.e., north) by cold are
uninhabitable.”

[207]
Impiger extremos curris mercator ad Indos,
Per mare pauperiem fugiens, per saxa, per ignes.

Horace, Epist. I. ll. 45-6.

[208] “18. Yea, I hated all my labor which I had taken
under the sun: because I should leave it unto the man that
shall be after me.
“19. And who knoweth whether he shall be a wise man or a
fool?”
Ecclesiastes, ch. ii. vers. 18, 19.

[209] Sir Ferdinando Gorges, of Ashton Phillips in
Somerset, has already been frequently referred to in the
introductory portions of this volume. Of an old West
Country family and pure English descent, he was born
about the year 1560 (iv. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. vii. p. 329).
He early devoted himself to a military and naval life, and in
1591 served under Essex at the siege of Rouen.
Subsequently he is said to have been wounded, either at
Amiens, or during the siege of Paris by Henry IV. In
consequence of his services he was appointed by Queen

Page 340

Elizabeth royal governor of Plymouth, and in 1597 was
designated as one of the staff of Essex in the Ferrol
expedition, with the title of Sergeant-Major. In 1601 he was
concerned in Essex’s insurrection, and was one of the
principal witnesses against the Earl at his trial. After a
considerable period of imprisonment he was released, and,
on the accession of James I., was reappointed governor of
Plymouth. In 1605 he became interested in American
discovery and colonization, and in 1607 he was one of the
projectors of the Popham colony in Maine. During the next
thirteen years he was engaged in fishing and trading
ventures to New England, and indefatigable in collecting
information as to America. (Palfrey, vol. i. p. 79.) In 1620
he procured from James I. the great patent of the Council
for New England. In 1623 he sent out the Robert Gorges
expedition which settled itself at Wessagusset. (Supra, 2-4.)
His subsequent connection with Morton, and his intrigues
against the Massachusetts colony and charter, have been
sufficiently referred to in this volume. During the Civil War
Gorges espoused the royal side, and was made a prisoner
when Fairfax captured Bristol in August 1645. He died
probably about the 10th of May 1647, as he was buried on
the 14th of that month.
In regard to Gorges, see Belknap’s American Biography;
Folsom’s Catalogue of Original Documents in the English
Archives relating to the Early History of the State of Maine;
Williamson’s Maine; Palfrey’s New England (vol. i.);
Poole’s Introduction to Johnson’s Wonder Working
Providence; Devereux’s Earls of Essex (vol. i.); and the
Briefe Narration (iii. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. vi. p. 44), and
Gorges’s own letters, to Winthrop and others, in the
Winthrop Papers. (iv. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. vii.)

[210] That is, in 1634. See supra, 78.

Page 341

[211] These are the Inner Harbor (Boston), so called, and
Dorchester, Quincy, and Weymouth bays. The latter
includes all the inlets south and west of Nut and Pettuck’s
islands and Hull, among which is Hingham Bay.

[212] “Sleetch, n. The thick mud or slush lying at the
bottom of rivers.” Webster.

[213] [iland.] See supra, 111, note 1.

[214] Supra, 6-7.

[215] In the letter already quoted from (Supra, 14), Mr. J.
H. Trumbull remarked that “Morton, as he shows in chap.
ii. of book i., could not write the most simple Indian word
without a blunder.” As respects the words which Morton
believed to be Indian-Greek, Mr. Trumbull has further
kindly furnished the following notes: “En animia—
Wunanumau, as Eliot wrote it, signifies ‘he is well
disposed, or well minded toward another,’ or ‘is pleased
with’ him. There is another word, nearly related, which
Morton may have had in mind, meaning ‘to help,’ ‘do a
favor to,’—aninumeh, ‘help me’ (Eliot), anúnime (R.
Williams).”

[216] “Paskanontam (Eliot), ‘he suffers from hunger,’ ‘is
starving.’ In Eliot’s orthography, paskuppoo would signify
‘he eats hungrily,’ or ‘as if starving,’ and from this comes
the verbal Paskup-wen or Paskuppoo-en ‘a starving
eater’—Morton’s ‘greedy gut.’”

[217] “Eliot’s paskanontam, as above, which is well
enough translated by ‘halfe starved.’”

Page 342

[218] “I can make nothing of these words. They certainly
do not mean ‘set it upright.’”

[219] “An island is munnoh (Eliot).”

[220] “Here Morton mistook the word. Cos is, probably,
Koüs (Eliot), ‘sharp-pointed,’ or, from the same root,
mukqs, (Eliot), mucks (R. Williams), ‘an awl,’ used for
boring wampum, beads, &c.; cau-ompsk (R. Williams) was
‘a whetstone,’ i. e., a sharpening stone.”

[221] “Om (aum, Eliot), is fish-hook; aumau-i, ‘he is
fishing’ (with hook and line,) R. Williams; whence omaën,
(Eliot) ‘a fisherman.’”

[222] “Probably misprinted for Pantucket—the equivalent
of Pautucket, meaning ‘at the fall’ of the river. (The n was
not distinctly sounded, but represents the nasalization of the
preceding vowel.)”

[223] “Mattapan means ‘sitting down’—or ‘a setting
down’—and usually designates the end of a ‘carry’ or
portage, where the canoes were put in water again.”

[224] Winslow, in his Relations, says of the Indians: “The
people are very ingenious and observative; they keep
account of time by the moon, and winters or summers; they
know divers of the stars by name; in particular they know
the north star, and call it maske, which is to say, the bear.”
(Young’s Chron. of Pilg., pp. 365-6.) See also to the same
effect, Roger Williams’s Key (Publications of the
Narragansett Club, vol. i.) and Mr. Trumbull’s note (p.
105). Mr. Trumbull now further adds: “The name (maske)
was given to Ursa Major or Charles’s Wain, not to the
North Star; and by nearly all Algonkin tribes. An interesting

Page 343

note on this point can be found in Hopkins’s Hist.
Memorials of the Housatonic Indians (p. 11), and another
in Dawson’s Acadian Geology (2d ed. p. 675), showing that
the Micmacs still know that constellation as Mooin, ‘the
bear.’”

[225] Roger Williams, in the preface to his Key (p. 23),
says: “Wise and judicious men, with whom I have
discoursed, maintain their [the Indians] original to be
northward from Tartaria.” The Asiatic origin of the North
American Indians was a necessary part of the scriptural
dogma of the origin and descent of man. It is safe, however,
to assert that, first and last, every possible theory on this
subject has been carefully elaborated. It is not necessary, in
connection with the New Canaan, to enter into the
discussion, as the views of those, from St. Gregory to
Voltaire, who have taken part in it, have been laboriously
collected by Drake in his Book of Indians (ch. ii.).

[226] [muit.] See supra, 111, note 1.

[227] See Infra *182-4 and note.

[228] David Thomson occupied the island in Boston
Harbor, which still bears his name, from some time in
1625, apparently, until his death in 1628 (supra, 24). He
left a widow and an only son, who inherited the island.
Originally, Thomson seems to have been a messenger, or
possibly an agent, of the Council for New England. In
November, 1622, a patent, covering a considerable tract of
land, was issued to him, and the next year, he then being
apparently a young man and newly married, he came out
and established himself at Piscataqua, whence he
afterwards moved to Boston Harbor. All that is known of
Thomson can be found in Mr. Deane’s Notes to an
Indenture, &c., in the Proc. Mass. Hist. Soc., 1876 (pp.

Page 344

358-81). See also, Proc. Mass. Hist. Soc., 1878 (p. 204),
and Memorial History of Boston (vol. i. p. 83).

[229] Morton’s attempt to trace the origin of the North
American Indians from Brutus, and the support he finds for
his theory in the resemblance of some Indian to Greek
words, there being no reason to suppose that Brutus or the
Latins had any acquaintance with Greek, reads like a
humorous satire on the historical methods in vogue with the
writers of his time. Until within the last century there were
two historical events, or events assumed to be historical, to
one or the other of which it was deemed safe to refer the
origin of any modern nation. These events were the Siege
of Troy and the Flood,—the profane and the sacred
beginnings of modern history. Morton wrote in 1635, and
his mind naturally had recourse to the profane theory.
Fifteen years later, Milton began his history of England,
and at the outset came in contact with Brutus. “That which
we have,” he then remarks, “of oldest seeming, hath by the
greater part of judicious antiquaries been long rejected for a
modern fable.” He nevertheless “determined to bestow the
telling over even of these reputed tales, ... seeing that
ofttimes relations heretofore accounted fabulous have been
after found to contain in them many footsteps and reliques
of something true; as what we read in poets of the flood,
and giants little believed, till undoubted witnesses taught us
that all was not feigned.” Then passing on, he says: “After
the flood, and the dispersing of nations, as they journeyed
leisurely from the East, Gomer, the eldest son of Japhet,
and his offspring, as by authorities, arguments and affinity
of divers names is generally believed, were the first that
peopled all these west and northern climes.” Coming down
to Brutus and the whole progeny of kings, and following
Geoffrey of Monmouth, Milton then recounts in detail the
marriages, voyages, adventures and mishaps of the
descendants of Æneas until Brutus reached an “island, not
yet Britain but Albion, in a manner desert and inhospitable;

Page 345

kept only by a remnant of giants, whose excessive force
and tyranny had destroyed the rest. These Brutus destroys,”
and, after this, “in a chosen place, builds Troja Nova,
changed in time to Trinovantum, now London.”
The superiority of Morton’s historical method to Milton’s,
or to that in use in Milton’s time, is obvious. Accepting the
common origin, he premises that he does not find that
“when Brutus did depart from Latium his whole number
went with him at once.” Accordingly, some of them being
put to sea, “might encounter with a storm,” and then being
carried out of sight of land, “they might sail God knoweth
whether, and so might be put on this coast, as well as any
other.” And hence the author is “bold to conclude that the
original of the natives of New England may be well
conjectured to be from the scattered Trojans, after such
time as Brutus departed from Latium.”
It would be easy to quote from many serious productions,
contemporaneous with the New Canaan and a century after
it, examples of the same method of daring historical
hypothesis; a single instance will, however, suffice. In his
history of Lynn, written in 1829, the Rev. Alonzo Lewis
says (p. 21): “The Indians are supposed by some to be the
remnants of the long lost ten tribes of Israel; and their
existence in tribes, the similarity of some of their customs,
and the likeness of many words in their language, seem to
favor this opinion.”
More sensible than either Thomas Morton or Mr. Lewis,
William Wood, in writing his New England’s Prospect, in
1633, remarks (p. 78), that “Some have thought they [the
Indians] might be of the dispersed Jews, because some of
their words be near unto the Hebrew; but by the same rule
they may conclude them to be some of the gleanings of all
nations, because they have words which sound after the
Greek, Latin, French, and other tongues.”

Page 346

There is in the Magnalia (book iii. part iii.) a lengthy but
highly characteristic passage, in which Mather recounts the
points of resemblance which the evangelist Eliot saw
between the Indians and “the posterity of the dispersed and
rejected Israelites.”

[230] Peddock’s, or Pettick’s, Island, still so called, is one
of the largest islands in Boston Bay. It lies directly opposite
to George’s Island and Hull, from which last it is separated
by a narrow channel, and is between Weymouth and
Quincy bays, on the east and west. See Shurtleff’s
Description of Boston, p. 557.

[231] Leonard Peddock seems to have been in the
employment of the Council for New England. In the
records of the Council for the 8th of November, 1622, is the
following entry: “Mr. Thomson is ordered to pay unto Leo:
Peddock £10 towards his paynes for his last Imployments
to New England.” Subsequently, on the 19th of the same
month: “It is ordered that a Letter be written from the
Counsell to Mr. Weston, to deliver to Leonard Peddock, a
boy Native of New England called papa Whinett belonging
to Abbadakest, Sachem of Massachusetts, which boy Mr
Peddock is to carry over with him” (Proceedings of the
American Antiquarian Society, April, 1867, pp. 70, 74).
Andrew Weston had returned to England in the Charity,
leaving Wessagussett in September, 1622 (supra, 7). He
would seem to have brought over the Indian boy in
question with him. From the entry in the records of the
Council for New England, just quoted, it would appear that
Leonard Peddock was in New England during the summer
of 1622. The reference to him in the text is additional
evidence that Morton was there at the same time, and in
company with Weston.

Page 347

[232] This is undoubtedly a misprint for Auckies, which
was a sailor’s corruption for Auks. The Great Auk (Alca
impennis) is probably referred to. This bird, now supposed
to be extinct, was formerly common on the New England
coast. Audubon, writing in 1838, says: “An old gunner,
residing on Chelsea Beach, near Boston, told me that he
well remembered the time when the Penguins were
plentiful about Nahant and some other islands in the bay.”
(Am. Ornithological Biog., vol. iv. p. 316.) Professor Orton,
alluding to this passage, in the American Naturalist (1869,
p. 540), expresses the opinion that the Razor-billed Auk
was the bird referred to; but Professor F. W. Putnam adds,
in a foot-note, that “the ‘old hunter’ was undoubtedly
correct in his statement, as we have bones of the species
taken from the shell-heaps of Marblehead, Eagle Hill in
Ipswich, and Plum Island.” Dr. Jeffries Wyman found them
in the shell-heaps at Cotuit. See Mem. Hist. of Boston, vol.
i. p. 12.
There is an elaborate paper on the Great Auk, under the title
of “The Garefowl and its Historians,” by Professor Alfred
Newton, in the Natural History Review for 1865, p. 467.

[233] Morton would seem to be mistaken in this statement.
Between 1614 and 1619 two French vessels were lost on
the Massachusetts coast. One was wrecked on Cape Cod,
and the crew, who succeeded in getting on shore, were most
of them killed by the savages, and the remainder enslaved
in the way described in the text. Two of these captives were
subsequently redeemed by Captain Dermer (Bradford, p.
98). The other vessel was captured by the savages in
Boston Bay, and burned. This is the vessel referred to by
Morton as riding at anchor off Peddock’s Island. The
circumstances of the capture are described in Phinehas
Pratt’s narrative (iv. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. iv. pp. 479, 489).
All the crew, he says, were killed, and the ship, after
grounding, was burned. Pratt’s statement is distinct, and

Page 348

agrees with Bradford’s, that the captives among the Indians
were the survivors from the vessel wrecked on Cape Cod,
not from that captured in Boston Bay.

[234] Pratt’s account of this survivor among the French
crew is to be found in iv. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. iv. pp. 479,
489. He says that “one of them was wont to read much in a
book (some say it was the New Testament), and that the
Indians enquiring of him what his book said, he told them it
did intimate that there was a people like French men that
would come into the country and drive out the Indians.”
The account given by Mather (Magnalia, B. i. ch. ii. § 6) is
curiously like that in the text. After quoting the substance of
Pratt’s statement he adds: “These infidels then
blasphemously replied, ‘God could not kill them;’ which
blasphemous mistake was confuted by a horrible and
unusual plague, whereby they were consumed in such vast
multitudes that our first planters found the land almost
covered with their unburied carcases; and they that were
left alive were smitten into awful and humble regards of the
English by the terrors which the remembrance of the
Frenchman’s prophecy had imprinted on them.”
Pratt, whom Mather followed, claims to have derived his
knowledge of these events during the winter of 1622-3
directly from savages concerned in them. The probability is
that the tradition of the French captive, and his book and
prophecy, was a common one among the settlers both at
Plymouth and about Boston Bay. Pratt apparently had a
habit, as he grew old, of appropriating to his own account
many of the earlier and more striking incidents of colonial
history. (Mather’s Early New England, p. 17.)

[235] The mysterious pestilence, which in the years 1616
and 1617 swept away the New England Indians from the
Penobscot to Narragansett Bay, is mentioned by all the
earlier writers, and its character has recently been

Page 349

somewhat discussed. There can be no doubt that it
practically destroyed the tribes, especially the
Massachusetts and the Pokanokets, among which it raged.
The former were reduced from a powerful people, able, it is
said, to muster three thousand warriors, to a mere remnant a
few hundred strong. The Pokanokets were in some
localities, notably at Plymouth, actually exterminated, and
the country left devoid of inhabitants (i. Mass. Hist. Coll.,
vol. i. p. 148; Young’s Chron. of Pilg., p. 183). Winslow
gave a description of the desolation created by this
pestilence, and of the number of the unburied dead, very
like that in the text (Young’s Chron. of Pilg., pp. 183, 206).
On this subject, see also, Bradford, pp. 102, 325; Johnson,
p. 16; Wood’s Prospect, p. 72; iii. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. vi.
p. 57.
No definite conclusion as to the nature of this pestilence
has been reached by medical men. It has been suggested
that it was the yellow-fever (Palfrey, vol. i. p. 99, n). As,
however, it raged equally in the depth of the severest winter
as in summer, this could not have been the case (iii. Mass.
Hist. Coll., vol. vi. p. 57; Bradford, p. 325). Other modern
medical authorities have inclined to the opinion that it was
a visitation of small-pox (Dr. Holmes in Mass. Hist. Soc.,
Low. Inst. Lect., 1869, p. 261; Dr. Green’s Centennial
Address before the Mass. Med. Soc., June 7, 1881, p. 12). In
support of this hypothesis Captain Thomas Dermer is
quoted, who, sailing along the coast in 1619-20, wrote “we
might perceive the sores of some that had escaped, who
described the spots of such as usually die” (Purchas, vol. iv.
p. 1778). On the other hand, none of the contemporaneous
writers who speak of the disease ever call it the small-pox,
though all of them were perfectly familiar with small-pox,
and a very large portion of them probably bore its marks.
Dermer speaks of it as “the plague.” Bradford, when the
same pestilence raged on the Connecticut, described it as
“an infectious fever.” Dr. Fuller, the first New England
physician, then died of it (Bradford, p. 314). He could not

Page 350

but have been familiar with the small-pox and its
symptoms; and it would seem most improbable that he
should have died of that disease among his dying
neighbors, and not have known what was killing him.
Moreover, in 1633-4 the small-pox did rage among the
Indians, and Bradford, in giving a fearfully graphic account
of its ravages, adds, “they [the Indians] fear it more than the
plague.” Josselyn also draws the same distinction, saying
(Two Voyages, p. 123): “Not long before the English came
into the country, happened a great mortality amongst [the
Indians]; especially where the English afterwards planted,
the East and Northern parts were sore smitten by the
contagion; first by the plague, afterwards, when the English
came, by the small-pox.”
It would seem, therefore, that the pestilence of 1616-7 was
clearly not the small-pox. More probably it was, as
Bradford says, “an infectious fever,” or some form of
malignant typhus, due to the wretched sanitary condition of
the Indian villages, which had become over-crowded,
owing to that prosperous condition of the tribes which
Smith describes as existing at the time of his visit to the
coast in 1614 (iii. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. vi. p. 109).

[236] “Their houses, which they call wigwams, are built
with poles pitcht into the ground of a round form for most
part, sometimes square. They bind down the tops of their
poles, leaving a hole for smoak to go out at, the rest they
cover with the bark of trees, and line the inside of their
wigwams with mats made of rushes painted with several
colors. One good post they set up in the middle that reaches
to the hole in the top, with a staff across before it; at a
convenient height, they knock in a pin upon which they
hang their kettle. Beneath that they set up a broad stone for
a back which keepeth the post from burning. Round by the
walls they spread their mats and skins where the men sleep
whilst their women dress their victuals. They have

Page 351

commonly two doors, one opening to the south, the other to
the north, and, according as the wind sets, they close up one
door with bark and hang a deers skin or the like before the
other. Towns they have none, being always removing from
one place to another for conveniency of food, sometimes to
those places where one sort of fish is most plentiful, other
whiles where others are. I have seen half a hundred of their
wigwams together in a piece of ground and they show
prettily; within a day or two or a week they have been all
dispersed.” (Josselyn’s Voyages, p. 126). See also Young’s
Chron. of Pilg., p. 144.

[237] Giving in his Key (p. 48) the Indian combination of
words signifying “let us lay on wood,” Roger Williams
adds: “This they do plentifully when they lie down to sleep
winter and summer, abundance they have and abundance
they lay on: their fire is instead of our bed-clothes. And so,
themselves and any that have any occasion to lodge with
them, must be content to turn often to the fire, if the night
be cold, and they who first wake must repair the fire.”
Elsewhere he says: “God was pleased to give me a painful,
patient spirit, to lodge with them in their filthy, smoky
holes.” See also Gookin’s Indians, i. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol.
i. p. 150.
When Stephen Hopkins and Edward Winslow were sent on
their mission to Massasoit, in June, 1621, they say of their
entertainment on the night they arrived at his lodge: “Late it
grew, but victuals he offered none; for indeed he had not
any, being he came so newly home. So we desired to go to
rest: he layd us on the bed with himself and his wife, they
at the one end and we at the other, it being only planks layd
a foot from the ground, and a thin mat upon them. Two
more of his chief men, for want of room, pressed by and
upon us; so that we were worse weary of our lodging than
of our journey.” (Mourt, p. 45). Two nights of this
entertainment sufficed for the embassadors who “feared we

Page 352

should either be light-headed for want of sleep, for what
with bad lodging, the savages barbarous singing, (for they
use to sing themselves asleep,) lice and fleas within doors,
and musketos without, we could hardly sleep all the time of
our being there.” (Ib., p. 46) Another observer remarked of
the New England Indians: “Tame cattle they have none,
excepting Lice, and Dogs of a wild breed” (Josselyn’s
Voyages, p. 127); and to the same effect Roger Williams
notes (Key, p. 74): “In middle of summer, because of the
abundance of fleas, which the dust of the house breeds,
they [the Indians] will fly and remove on a sudden to a
fresh place.”
Smith, describing the Virginia Indians, says (True Travels,
vol. i. p. 130): “Their houses are built like our arbors, of
small young springs bowed and tyed, and so close covered
with mats, or the barkes of trees very handsomely, that
nothwithstanding either winde, raine, or weather, they are
as warm as stoves, but very smoaky, yet at the toppe of the
house there is a hole made for the smoake to go into right
over the fire.
“Against the fire they lie on little hurdles of Reeds covered
with a mat, borne from the ground a foote and more by a
hurdle of wood. On these round about the house they lie
heads and points, one by the other, against the fire, some
covered with mats, some with skins, and some stark naked
lie on the ground, from six to twenty in a house.”
In Parkman’s Jesuits in North America there is a lively
account of Le Jeune’s experience in passing the winter of
1633-4 among the Algonquins: “Put aside the bear-skin,
and enter the hut. Here, in a space some thirteen feet
square, were packed nineteen savages, men, women and
children, with their dogs, crouched, squatted, coiled like
hedge-hogs, or lying on their backs, with knees drawn up
perpendicularly to keep their feet out of the fire.... The bark
covering was full of crevices, through which the icy blasts
streamed in upon him from all sides; and the hole above, at

Page 353

once window and chimney, was so large, that, as he [Le
Jeune] lay, he could watch the stars as well as in the open
air. While the fire in the midst, fed with fat pine-knots,
scorched him on one side, on the other he had much ado to
keep himself from freezing. At times, however, the
crowded hut seemed heated to the temperature of an oven.
But these evils were light when compared to the intolerable
plague of smoke. During a snow-storm, and often at other
times, the wigwam was filled with fumes so dense, stifling,
and acrid, that all its inmates were forced to lie flat on their
faces, breathing through mouths in contact with the cold
earth. Their throats and mouths felt as if on fire; their
scorched eyes streamed with tears.... The dogs were not an
unmixed evil, for by sleeping on and around [Le Jeune],
they kept him warm at night; but, as an offset to this good
service, they walked, ran and jumped over him as he lay”
(pp. 27-8).

[238] In regard to the food of the Indians and their alternate
gluttony and abstinence, see Josselyn’s Two Voyages, pp.
129-30; Wood’s Prospect, p. 57. Wood’s account of the
Indians is usually the best. As respects eating, he says: “At
home they will eate till their bellies stand South, ready to
split with fulnesse: it being their fashion, to eate all at
sometimes, and sometimes nothing at all in two or three
days, wise providence being a stranger to their wilder
dayes.”

[239] “Cattup keen? ‘Are you hungry?’ Meechin, ‘meat;’
or, as an Indian would be more likely to say, Meech, ‘eat.’
In Eliot’s orthography, Kodtup kēn? Meechum, ‘victuals,
food,’ or meech, ‘eat.’”—J. H. Trumbull.

[240] In regard to the hospitality of the Indians, Wood says
(Prospect, p. 59): “Though they be sometimes scanted, yet
are they as free as Emperors, both to their countrymen and

Page 354

English, be he stranger or mere acquaintance; counting it a
great discourtesie not to eat of their high conceited
delicates, and sup of their un-oat-meal’d broth, made thick
with fishes, fowles and beasts boiled all together; some
remaining raw, the rest converted by over-much seething to
a loathed mass, not halfe so good as Irish Boniclapper.”
See also Gookin’s Indians, i. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. i. p.
153.
So also Roger Williams (Key, ch. ii. and iii.): “If any
stranger came in, they presently give him to eat of what
they have; many a time, and at all times of the night (as I
have fallen in travel, upon their houses) where nothing hath
been ready, have themselves and their wives, risen to
prepare me some refreshing.”
“In Summer-time I have knowne them lye abroad often
themselves, to make room for strangers, English, or
others.”
“I have known them leave their House and Mat
to lodge a friend or stranger,
Where Jewes and Christians oft have sent
Christ Jesus to the manger.”

[241] In regard to the games and removals of the Indians,
see Williams’s Key, chs. xi. and xxviii.; Smith’s True
Travels, vol. i. p. 133; Gookin’s Indians, i. Mass. Hist.
Coll., vol. i. p. 153; and Wood’s Prospect; pp. 63, 73-5.
Wood gives an excellent description of the Indian game of
foot-ball: “Their goals be a mile long placed on the sands,
which are as even as a board; their ball is no bigger than a
hand-ball, which sometimes they mount in the air with their
naked feet, sometimes it is swayed by the multitude;
sometimes also it is two days before they get a goal; then
they mark the ground they win, and begin the next day....
Though they play never so fiercely to outward appearance,
yet anger-boiling blood never streams in their cooler veins;
if any man be thrown, he laughs out his foil, there is no

Page 355

seeking of revenge, no quarrelling, no bloody noses,
scratched faces, black eyes, broken shins, no bruised
members or crushed ribs, the lamentable effects of rage; but
the goal being won, the goods on the one side lost; friends
they were at the foot-ball, and friends they must meet at the
kettle.” To the same effect see Strachey’s Historie, p. 78.

[242] Ipsisque in hominibus nulla gens est neque tam
immansueta, neque tam fera, quæ non, etiam si ignoret
qualem habere deum deceat, tamen habendum sciat (De
Legibus, Lib. i. § 8).
Quæ est enim gens, aut quod genus hominum, quod non
habeat sine doctrinâ anticipationem quandam deorum? (De
Natura Deorum, Lib. i. § 16).

[243] The reference here is to Wood’s New England’s
Prospect (p. 70). In regard to the time when this work was
written and published, see Mr. Deane’s preface to the
edition in the publications of the Prince Society. Morton
makes numerous references to it in the New Canaan (infra,
*38, 53, 64, 84, 99). The present reference is one of the few
unintelligible passages in the book. Wood’s language, to
which Morton apparently takes exception, is as follows:
“As it is natural to all mortals to worship something, so do
these people; but exactly to describe to whom their worship
is chiefly bent, is very difficult; they acknowledge
especially two, Ketan, who is their good God, to whom
they sacrifice after their garners be full with a good crop:
upon this God likewise they invocate for fair weather, for
rain in time of drought, and for the recovery of their sick;
but if they do not hear them, then they verify the old verse,
Flectere si nequeo Superes, Acheronta movebo, their Pow-
wows betaking themselves to their exorcisms and
unromantick charms ... by God’s permission, through the
Devil’s help, their charms are of force to produce effects of
wonderment.” Morton would seem to have wished to

Page 356

depreciate Wood, as an authority on New England, and so,
playing upon his name and the title of his book, he implied
that he had taken a much more elevated view of the
religious development of the Indians than could be justified
either by the actual facts, or the judgment of the best
informed.
Being unintelligible, the passage, from the word “neither”
to the end of the paragraph, is reproduced here in all
respects, including punctuation, as it is in the text of the
original edition.

[244] There is no expression of this nature to be found
anywhere in those writings of Sir William Alexander which
have come down to us and are included in the publications
of the Prince Society. He may have used the expression
quoted in conversation, or in a letter. Winslow, in Mourt,
says: “They [the savages] are a people without any religion,
or knowledge of any God” (p. 61). This statement he
subsequently, however, retracted in his Good News
(Young’s Chron. of Pilg., p. 355), where he says, “therein I
erred, though we could then gather no better.”
The subject of the religion of the North American
aborigines has been treated by Parkman in the introduction
to the Jesuits in North America (pp. lxvii.-lxxxix.), and he
concludes that “the primitive Indian, yielding his untutored
homage to an All-pervading grand Omnipotent Spirit, is a
dream of poets, rhetoricians and sentimentalists.” To the
same effect Palfrey, at the close of his vigorous discussion
of the same subject (vol. i. p. 45), declares that the devout
Indian of the “untutored mind is as fabulous as the griffin
or the centaur.”

[245] Thomas May, better known as the historian and
secretary of the Long Parliament, was born in 1595 and
died in 1650. In 1627 he published a translation of Lucan’s
Pharsalia, with a supplementum, or continuation (1630), by

Page 357

himself in seven books. This continuation he subsequently
translated into Latin, and it is included in Lemaire’s edition
of the Pharsalia in his Bibliotheca Classica Latina (Paris,
1832). The passage to which Morton refers is in the third
book of the continuation (ll. 108-78). The following are
some of the verses:—
“But in a higher kind (as some relate)
Do Elephants with men communicate.
(If you believe it) a religion
They have, and monthly do adore the Moon,
Besides the loftie Nabathæan wood,
Of vast extent, Amylo’s gentle flood,
Gliding along, the sandie mould combines.
Thither, as oft as waxing Cynthia shines
In her first borrowed light, from out the wood,
Come all the Elephants, and in the floud
Washing themselves (as if to purifie)
They prostrate fall; and when religiously
They have adored the Moon, return again
Into the woods with joy.”

[246] In his Latin poem on New England, which the Rev.
William Morell wrote during his eighteen months’
residence at Wessagusset as the spiritual head of the Robert
Gorges settlement of 1623, there is a description of the
Indian and his garments. The following is the author’s
English rendering of his more elegant Latin original:—

Page 358

“Whose hayre is cut with greeces, yet a locke
Is left; the left side bound up in a knott:
Their males small labour but great pleasure know,
Who nimbly and expertly draw the bow;
Traind up to suffer cruell heat and cold,
Or what attempt so ere may make them bold;
Of body straight, tall, strong, mantled in skin
Of deare or bever, with the hayre-side in;
An otter skin their right armes doth keepe warme,
To keepe them fit for use, and free from harme;
A girdle set with formes of birds or beasts,
Begirts their waste, which gentle gives them ease.
Each one doth modestly bind up his shame,
And deare-skin start-ups reach up to the same;
A kind of pinsen keeps their feet from cold,
Which after travels they put off, up-fold,
Themselves they warme, their ungirt limbes they rest
In straw, and houses, like to sties.”

i. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. i. p. 131.

Wood’s description of the Indian apparel is very like
Morton’s. He says, however: “The chiefe reasons they
render why they will not conforme to our English apparell
are because their women cannot wash them when they be
soyled, and their meanes will not reach to buy new when
they have done with their old; and they confidently beleeve,
the English will not be so liberall as to furnish them upon
gifture: therefore they had rather goe naked than be lousie,
and bring their bodies out of their old tune, making them
more tender by a new acquired habit, which poverty would
constrain them to leave.” (Prospect, p. 56).
The description given by Winslow (Young’s Chron. of
Pilg., p. 365) is very similar to Morell’s. See also Gookin’s
Indians, i. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. i. p. 152; Josselyn’s Two
Voyages, pp. 128-9, and Williams’s Key, ch. xx.

Page 359

Smith (True Travels, vol. i. p. 129) says: “For their apparell,
they are sometimes covered with the skinnes of wilde
beasts, which in winter are dressed with the hayre, but in
Sommer without. The better sort use large mantels of Deare
skins, not much differing in fashion from the Irish mantels.
Some imbrodered with white beads, some with copper,
others painted after their manner. But the common sort
have scarce to cover their nakednesse, but with grasse, the
leaves of trees or such like. We have seene some use
mantels made of Turkey feathers so prettily wrought and
woven with threads that nothing could be discerned but the
feathers.”
[247] Supra, 16, note.

[248] Speaking of a ceremony common to the Algonquins
and the Hurons, of propitiating their fishing-nets by
formally marrying them every year to two young girls,
Parkman says: “As it was indispensable that the brides
should be virgins, mere children were chosen” (The Jesuits
in North America, p. lxix. note). The subject of female
chastity among the Indians has already been referred to
(supra, p. 17), and it is extremely questionable whether
they had any conception of it. Winslow, in his Good News
(Young’s Chron. of Pilg., p. 364) says:—“When a maid is
taken in marriage, she first cutteth her hair, and after
weareth a covering on her head, till her hair be grown out.
Their women are diversely disposed; some as modest, as
they will scarce talk one with another in the company of
men, being very chaste also; yet others seem light,
lascivious, and wanton.... Some common strumpets there
are, as well as in other places; but they are such as either
never married, or widows, or put away for adultery; for no
man will keep such an one to wife.” Strachey (Historie, p.
65), says of the Virginians: “Their younger women goe not
shadowed [clothed] amongst their owne companie, until
they be nigh eleaven or twelve returnes of the leafe old, nor
are they much ashamed thereof, and therefore would the

Page 360

before remembered Pochahuntas, a well featured, but
wanton yong girle, Powhatan’s daughter, sometymes
resorting to our fort, of the age then of eleven or twelve
yeares, get the boyes forth with her into the markett place,
and make them wheele, falling on their hands, turning up
their heeles upwards, whome she would followe, and
wheele so her self, naked as she was, all the fort over; but
being over twelve yeares, they put on a kind of
semecinctum lethern apron (as doe our artificers or
handycrafts men) before their bellies, and are very
shamefac’t to be seen bare.” Ellis, in his Red Man and
White Man (p. 185), remarks on this point: “The obscenity
of the savages is unchecked in its revolting and disgusting
exhibitions. Sensuality seeks no covert.”
Under these circumstances it is unnecessary to say that
Morton’s statements as to the red cap and the Sachem’s
privilege are pure fiction, and what Parkman says of the
Hurons is probably true of the Massachusetts,—their
women were wantons before marriage and household
drudges after it. (Jesuits in North America, p. xxxv).

[249] To the same effect Roger Williams says: “Most of
them count it a shame for a woman in travell to make
complaint, and many of them are scarcely heard to groane.
I have often known in one quarter of an hour a woman
merry in the house, and delivered and merry again: and
within two dayes abroad, and after foure or five dayes at
worke.” (Key, ch. xxiii.). See also Josselyn’s Two Voyages,
p. 127. Wood’s account is almost as comprehensive, though
not quite so detailed and graphic as Josselyn’s: “They
likewise sew their husband’s shooes, and weave mats of
Turkie feathers; besides all their ordinary household
drudgery which dayly lies upon them, so that a bigge belly
hinders no businesse nor a childbirth takes much time, but
the young infant being greased and footed, wrapped in a
Beaver skin, bound to his goode behaviour with his feete up

Page 361

to his bumme, upon a board two foot long and one foot
broade, his face exposed to all nipping weather, this little
Pappouse travels about with his bare-footed mother, to
paddle in the Icie Clammbanks after three or four daies of
age have sealed his passe-board and his mother’s recovery.”
(Prospect, p. 82). See also Young’s Chron. of Pilg., p. 358.

[250] The idea that the Indian was born white was very
commonly entertained in the first half of the seventeenth
century. Lechford, in his Plaine Dealing, says (p. 50):
“They are of complexion swarthy and tawny; their children
are borne white, but they bedaube them with oyle, and
colours, presently.” Josselyn also speaks of the Indians
“dying [their children] with a liquor of boiled Hemlock-
Bark” (Two Voyages, p. 128). Speaking of the Virginia
women, Smith says: “To make [their children] hardie, in the
coldest mornings they them wash in the rivers, and by
paynting and oyntments so tanne their skinnes, that after a
year or two, no weather will hurt them.” (True Travels, vol.
i. p. 131). Strachey gives a more particular account of the
supposed process: The Indians “are generally of a cullour
browne or rather tawny, which they cast themselves into
with a kind of arsenick stone, ... and of the same hue are
their women; howbeit, yt is supposed neither of them
naturally borne so discouloured; for Captain Smith (lyving
somtymes amongst them) affirmeth how they are from the
womb indifferent white, but as the men, so doe the women,
dye and disguise themselves into this tawny cowler,
esteeming yt the best beauty to be neerest such a kynd of
murrey as a sodden quince is of (to liken yt to the neerest
coulor I can), for which they daily anoint both face and
bodyes all over with such a kind of fucus or unguent as can
cast them into that stayne.” (Historie, p. 63).

[251] “If there was noticed a remarkable exemption from
physical deformities, this was probably not the effect of any
peculiar congenital force or completeness, but of

Page 362

circumstances which forbade the prolongation of any
imperfect life. The deaf, blind or lame child was too
burdensome to be reared, and according to a savage
estimate of usefulness and enjoyment, its prolonged life
would not requite its nurture.” Palfrey, vol. i. p. 23.

[252] Mr. Trumbull writes: “Morton’s nan weeteo stands
for Eliot’s nanwetee (nanwetue, Cotton), ‘a bastard.’ Titta
should be tatta, a word common among Indians, which is
well enough translated by Morton. Eliot renders it ‘I know
not,’ and R. Williams adds to this meaning, ‘I cannot tell; it
may be so.’
“Cheshetue is unknown to me, but I am inclined to believe
that Morton heard something like it, in the connection and
substantially with the meaning he gives it,—some adjective
of dispraise, qualifying squaa, or, as we write it, squaw.”

[253] [likenesse.] See supra, 111, note 1.

[254] The observations of Roger Williams led him to a
different conclusion: “Their affections, especially to their
children, are very strong.... This extreme affection, together
with want of learning, makes their children saucie, bold and
undutifull. I once came into a house, and requested some
water to drink; the father bid his sonne (of some 8 yeeres of
age) to fetch some water: the boy refused, and would not
stir; I told the father, that I would correct my child, if he
should so disobey me &c. Upon this the father took up a
sticke, the boy another, and flew at his father: upon my
persuasion, the poore father made him smart a little, throw
down his stick, and run for water, and the father confessed
the benefits of correction, and the evill of their too
indulgent affections.” (Key, ch. v.)
To the same effect Champlain wrote (Voyages, vol. iii. p.
170): “The children have great freedom among these tribes.
The fathers and mothers indulge them too much, and never

Page 363

punish them. Accordingly they are so bad and of so vicious
a nature, that they often strike their mothers and others. The
most vicious, when they have acquired the strength and
power, strike their fathers. They do this whenever the father
or mother does anything that does not please them. This is a
sort of curse that God inflicts upon them.” Winslow, on the
other hand, in his Good News, lends some support to
Morton’s statement in the text. He says: “The younger sort
reverence the elder, and do all mean offices, whilst they are
together, although they be strangers.” (Young’s Chron. of
Pilg., p. 363.)

[255] This Sachem, “the most noted powow and sorcerer of
all the country,” is better known by the name of
Passaconaway. There is quite an account of him in Drake’s
Book of the Indians (B. iii. ch. vii). He is the Pissacannawa
mentioned by Wood in his Prospect (p. 70), of whom the
savages reported that he could “make the water burn, the
rocks move, the trees dance, metamorphize himself into a
flaming man.” Morton says of the Indian conjurers, “some
correspondency they have with the Devil out of all doubt;”
Wood, to the same effect, remarks that “by God’s
permission, through the Devil’s helpe, their charmes are of
force to produce effects of wonderment;” Smith declares of
the Indians, “their chiefe God they worship is the Devil”
(True Travels, vol. i. p. 138); Mather intimates that it was
the devil who seduced the first inhabitants of America into
it (Magnalia, B. i. ch. i. § 3), and Winthrop, describing the
great freshet of 1638, records that the Indians “being
pawawing in this tempest, the Devil came and fetched away
five of them” (vol. i. p. *293).
See also Gookin’s Indians, i. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. i. p.
154; Young’s Chron. of Pilg., p. 356; and Champlain’s
Voyages, vol. iii. p. 171. Champlain says the Indians do not
worship any God; “they have, however, some respect for
the devil.”

Page 364

[256] [Ingling.] See supra, 111, note 1.

[257] In regard to the Indian Powaws, priests, or medicine
men, and their methods of dealing with the sick, see the
detailed account in Champlain’s Voyages, vol. iii. pp. 171-
8; Josselyn’s Two Voyages, p. 134; Wood’s Prospect, p. 71;
Williams’s Key, ch. xxxi.; Gookin’s Indians, i. Mass. Hist.
Coll., vol. i. p. 154; Young’s Chron. of Pilg., pp. 317, 357;
Lechford’s Plaine Dealing, (Trumbull’s ed.) p. 117;
Parkman’s Jesuits in North America, pp. lxxxiv.-lxxxvii.;
also Magnalia, B. iii. part. iii., where Mather says: “In most
of their dangerous distempers, it is a powaw that must be
sent for; that is, a priest who has more familiarity with
Satan than his neighbors; this conjurer comes and roars and
howls and uses magical ceremonies over the sick man, and
will be well paid for it when he is done; if this don’t effect
the cure, the ‘man’s time is come, and there’s an end.’” For
a summary in Indian medical practice, see further, Ellis’s
Red Man and White Man, pp. 127-33.

[258] Passaconoway, already referred to (supra, p. 150,
note), dwelt at a place called Pennakook, and his dominions
extended over the sachems living upon the Piscataqua and
its branches. The young Sachem of Saugus was named
Winnepurkitt, and was commonly known among the
English as George Rumney-marsh. He was a son of
Nanepashemet, and at one time proprietor of Deer Island in
Boston Harbor. (Drake’s Book of the Indians, ed. 1851, pp.
105, 111, 278.) The incident in the text has been made the
subject of a poem, The Bridal of Pennacook, by Whittier,
and Drake repeats it; but as Winnepurkitt is said by Drake
to have been born in 1616, and to have succeeded
Montowampate as Sachem in 1633, and as Morton, at the
close of the present chapter, declares that “the lady, when I
came out of the country [in 1630], remained still with her
father,” the whole story would seem to be not only highly

Page 365

inconsistent with what we know of Indian life and habits,
but also at variance with facts and dates.

[259] [not determined.] See supra, 111, note 1.

[260] Josselyn’s account of the Indian wampum is written,
more than any other which has come down to us, in the
spirit of the New Canaan: “Their Merchandize are their
beads, which are their money, of these there are two sorts,
blew Beads and white Beads, the first is their Gold, the last
their Silver, these they work out of certain shells so
cunningly that neither Jew nor Devil can counterfeit, they
dril them and string them, and make many curious works
with them to adorn the persons of their Sagamores and
principal men and young women, as Belts, Girdles, Tablets,
Borders for their womens hair, Bracelets, Necklaces, and
links to hang in their ears. Prince Phillip, a little before I
came for England, coming to Boston, had a coat on and
Buskins set thick with these Beads in pleasant wild works,
and a broad belt of the same; his Accoutrements were
valued at Twenty pounds. The English Merchant giveth
them ten shillings a fathom for their white, and as much
more or near upon for their blew beads.” (Two Voyages, pp.
142-3.)
There is a much better description of wampum in Lawson’s
account of Carolina, quoted by Drake (Book of the Indians,
p. 328), in which he says that wampum was current money
among the Indians “all over the continent, as far as the bay
of Mexico.” Lawson’s explanation of the fact that wampum
was not counterfeited to any considerable extent is much
more natural than Morton’s. It cost more to counterfeit it
than it was worth. “To make this Peak it cost the English
five or ten times as much as they could get for it; whereas it
cost the Indians nothing, because they set no value upon
their time, and therefore have no competitors to fear, or that
others will take its manufacture out of their hands.”

Page 366

Roger Williams (Key, ch. xxvi.) devotes considerable space
to this subject, and says: “They [the Indians] hang these
strings of money about their necks and wrists; as also upon
the necks and wrists of their wives and children. They make
[girdles] curiously of one, two, three, foure and five inches
thickness and more, of this money which (sometimes to the
value of ten pounds and more) they weare about their
middle and as a scarfe about their shoulders and breasts.
Yea, the Princes make rich Caps and Aprons (or small
breeches) of these Beads thus curiously strung into many
formes and figures: their blacke and white finely mixt
together.” See also Trumbull’s notes in his edition of the
Key, and Palfrey, vol. i. p. 31. Parkman (Jesuits in North
America, pp. xxxi., lxi.) says of wampum: “This was at
once their currency, their ornament, their pen, ink and
parchment.” He describes the uses to which it was put
among the Hurons and Iroquois, but adds: “The art [of
working it] soon fell into disuse, however; for wampum
better than their own was brought them by the traders,
besides abundant imitations in glass and porcelain.”

Page 367

[261] “How have foule hands (in smoakie houses) the first
handling of these Furres which are often worne upon the
hands of Queens and heads of Princes!” (Williams’s Key, p.
158.)

[262] There is obviously some corruption of the original
manuscript here, but I have been unable to obtain any even
plausible suggestion of what word may have been turned
into “reles” through the compositor’s inability to decipher
copy.

[263] There is not much to be said on the manufactures,
utensils and trade of the New England aborigines. Gookin
(i. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. i. p. 151) has a comprehensive
paragraph on the subject, and there is a passage in Josselyn
(Two Voyages, p. 143). See also Williams’s Key, ch. xxv.

[264] Josselyn also speaks of “baskets, bags and mats
woven with Sparke.” (Two Voyages, p. 143.) “Spart,” Mr.
Trumbull writes, “was a northern English name for the
dwarf-rush, and (as ‘spart’ in the glossaries) for osiers, and
I guess, Morton’s and Josselyn’s sparke is another form of
that name.” Gookin says (i. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. i. p.
151): “Some of their baskets are made of rushes; some, of
bents; others, of maize-husks; others, of a kind of silk
grass; others, of a kind of wild hemp; and some, of barks of
trees.”

[265] Wood says of the Indian women: “Their corn being
ripe, they gather it, and drying it hard in the Sun, conveigh
it to their barnes, which be great holes digged in the ground
in forme of a brasse pot, seeled with rinds of trees, wherein
they put their corne, covering it from the inquisitive search
of their gurmundizing husbands, who would eate up both
their allowed portion, and reserved seed, if they knew
where to finde it. But our hogges having found a way to

Page 368

unhindge their barne doores, and robbe their garners, they
are glad to implore their husbands helpe to roule the bodies
of trees over their holes, to prevent these pioneers, whose
theevery they as much hate as their flesh.” (Prospect, p.
81.) Mather also, in enumerating the points of resemblance
between the Indians and the Israelites, (Magnalia, B. iii.
part iii.) says: “They have, too, a great unkindness for our
swine; but I suppose that is because the hogs devour the
clams, which are a dainty with them.”

[266] See Ellis’s Red Man and White Man, p. 148; also,
infra, 175, n.

[267] This Sachem has already been sufficiently referred to
(Supra, p. 11.) All that is known concerning him can be
found in Drake’s Book of the Indians, (ed. 1851), pp. 107-9.

[268] Morton’s neighbors at Wessaguscus were William
Jeffrey, John Bursley and such others of the Robert Gorges
expedition of 1623 as still remained there. (Supra, 4, 24,
30.) See also Mass. Hist. Soc. Proc. 1878, p. 198.

[269] Infra, *77.

[270] “Frumenty, n. [Also furmenty and fumety; from Lat.
frumentum]. Food made of wheat boiled in milk, and
seasoned with sugar, cinnamon, &c.” Webster.

[271] Squanto. See infra, *104.

[272] In reference to this passage, Mr. Francis Parkman
writes: “I have searched my memory in vain for anything in
the early French writers answering to Morton’s statement. I
don’t think that Cartier, Champlain, Biard, Lescarbot or Le
Jeune, the principal writers before 1635, make the
extraordinary assertions in question. In fact, as there were

Page 369

no Spaniards in Canada, and likely to be none on French
vessels going there, Indians of those parts would hardly
have the opportunity of distinguishing between them by
smell or otherwise. Indeed, they did not know the existence
of such a nation.”

[273] Supra, *27, note.

[274] “Kytan was an appellation of the greatest manito. The
word signifies ‘greatest’ or ‘pre-eminent.’ See my note (p.
207) in Lechford’s Plaine Dealing (p. 120), where is
mention of ‘Kitan, their good god.’ Roger Williams in a
letter to Thomas Thorowgood, 1635, names ‘their god
Kuttand to the south-west’ (Jewes in America, 1650, p. 6)
but in his Key, he writes the name Cautantowit (To the
Reader, p. 24.) i. e., Keihte-anito—‘greatest manito.’
“I have not met with the name Sanaconquam elsewhere: at
least I do not remember seeing it except in Morton. The
derivation is apparently from a word meaning to press
upon, to op-press, to crush, or the like.” (Manuscript Letter
of J. H. Trumbull, June 25, 1882.)
See, also, authorities referred to supra, p. 140, note, and
also Ellis’s Red Man and White Man, pp. 134-9. Morell has
a passage on the Indian’s methods of worship in his poem.
(i. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. i. p. 136.)

[275] Roger Williams says: “They will relate how they
have it from their Fathers, that Kantántowwit made one
man and woman of a stone, which disliking, he broke them
in pieces, and made another man and woman of a tree,
which were the Fountaines of all mankind.” (Key, ch. xxi.)
“They believe that the soules of men and women goe to the
Sou-west, their great and good men and women to
Cantántowwit his House, where they have hopes (as the

Page 370

Turks have) of carnal Joyes: Murtherers, theeves and Lyers,
their souls (say they) wander restlesse abroad.” (Ib.)
Wood, enlarging on this, says: “Yet do they hold the
immortality of the never-dying soul, that it shall passe to
the South-west Elysium, concerning which their Indian
faith jumps much with the Turkish Alchoran, holding it to
be a kind of Paradise, wherein they shall everlastingly
abide, solacing themselves in odoriferous Gardens, fruitfull
corn-fields, green meadows, bathing their hides in the coole
streams of pleasant Rivers, and shelter themselves from
heat and cold in the sumptuous Pallaces framed by the skill
of Natures curious contrivement. Concluding that neither
care nor pain shall molest them but that Natures bounty wil
administer all things with a voluntary contribution from the
overflowing storehouse of their Elysian Hospital, at the
portall whereof they say lies a great Dog, whose churlish
snarlings deny a Pax intrantibus to unworthy intruders.”
(Prospect, p. 79.)
Parkman says: “The primitive Indian believed in the
immortality of the soul, but he did not always believe in a
state of future reward and punishment.” (Jesuits in North
America, p. lxxx.) Referring to a case in which one of the
Jesuits quoted an Indian as saying “there was no future
life,” Parkman adds: “It would be difficult to find another
instance of the kind.”
The romantic view of the Indian on this point was taken by
Arnold, in his History of Rhode Island (vol. i. p. 78), and
the realistic view by Palfrey, in his New England (vol. i. p.
49); and, though writing at the same time, the two seem to
be controverting each other. See Ellis’s Red Man and White
Man, p. 115.

[276] Supra, p. 93.

Page 371

[277] Roger Williams, also, in a passage just quoted (supra,
168, note), speaks of the future punishment supposed,
among the New England Indians, to be allotted to thieves
and liars. Josselyn, on the other hand, describes them as
“very fingurative or theevish” (Two Voyages, p. 125); and
Gookin says: “They are naturally much addicted to lying
and speaking untruth: and unto stealing, especially from the
English” (i. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. i. p. 149). Winslow
describes the severe punishments inflicted for theft
(Young’s Chron. of Pilg., p. 364). Dodge, in his Wild
Indians (pp. 63-5), explains this discrepancy in the
authorities. He says: “All these authors are both right and
wrong. In their own bands, Indians are perfectly honest.... It
[theft] is the sole unpardonable crime among Indians.” He
then describes, like Winslow, the severity of the
punishments inflicted for thefts; “but,” he adds, “this
wonderfully exceptional honesty extends no further than to
the members of his immediate band. To all outside of it, the
Indian is not only one of the most arrant thieves in the
world, but this quality or faculty is held in the highest
estimation.”

[278] The reference is to ch. iii. of the Third Booke (infra,
*106-8). This passage would seem to indicate that the third
book of the New Canaan was written first, and that the two
other books were prepared subsequently, probably in
imitation of Wood’s Prospect. (See supra, 78.)

[279] “Yea, I saw with mine owne eyes that at my late
comming forth of the Countrey, the chiefe and most aged
peaceable Father of the countrey, Caunoŭnicus, having
buried his sonne, he burned his owne Palace, and all his
goods in it, (amongst them to a great value) in a sollemne
remembrance of his sonne, and in a kind of humble
Expiation to the Gods, who, (as they believe) had taken his
sonne from him.” (Williams’s Key, ch. xxxii.) In the same

Page 372

passage Williams says: “Upon the Grave is spread the Mat
that the party died on, the Dish he ate in, and, sometimes, a
faire Coat of skin hung upon the next tree to the Grave,
which none will touch, but suffer it there to rot with the
dead.” See also Young’s Chron. of Pilg., pp. 142, 143, 154,
363; Strachey’s Historie, p. 90.
“In times of general Mortality they omit the Ceremonies of
burying, exposing their dead Carkases to the Beasts of prey.
But at other times they dig a Pit and set the diseased therein
upon his breech upright, and, throwing in the earth, cover it
with the sods and bind them down with sticks, driving in
two stakes at each end; their mournings are somewhat like
the howlings of the Irish, seldom at the grave but in the
Wigwam where the party dyed, blaming the Devil for his
hard-heartedness, and concluding with rude prayers to him
to afflict them no further.” (Josselyn, Two Voyages, p. 132.)
There is a highly characteristic passage to the same effect in
Wood’s Prospect, p. 79.

[280] Supra, 143.

[281] The reference is to Wood’s New England’s Prospect,
p. 13; where, also, the Indian custom of firing the country
in November is described.

[282] Gookin says: “This beastly sin of drunkenness could
not be charged upon the Indians before the English and
other Christian nations, as Dutch, French, and Spaniards,
came to dwell in America: which nations, especially the
English in New-England, have cause to be greatly humbled
before God, that they have been, and are, instrumental to
cause these Indians to commit this great evil and beastly sin
of drunkenness.” (i. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. i. p. 151.)
In regard to the peculiarities of Indian drunkenness, see
Dodge’s Wild Indians, pp. 333-5. What is there said of the
Indians of “the plains” is probably true of all the northern

Page 373

American Indians. “This passion for intoxication amounts
almost to an insanity.... To drink liquor as a beverage, for
the gratification of taste, or for the sake of pleasurable
conviviality, is something of which the Indian can form no
conception. His idea of pleasure in the use of strong drink
is to get drunk, and the quicker and more complete that
effect, the better he likes it.”

[283] “They live in a country where we now have all the
conveniences of human life: but as for them, their housing
is nothing but a few mats tyed about poles fastened in the
earth, where a good fire is their bed-clothes in the coldest
seasons; their clothing is but a skin of a beast, covering
their hind-parts, their fore-parts having but a little apron,
where nature calls for secrecy; their diet has not a greater
dainty than their Nokehick, that is a spoonful of their
parched meal, with a spoonful of water, which will
strengthen them to travel a day to-gether; except we should
mention the flesh of deers, bears, mose, rackoons, and the
like, which they have when they can catch them; as also a
little fish, which, if they would preserve, it was by drying,
not by salting; for they had not a grain of salt in the world,
I think, till we bestowed it on them.” Magnalia, B. iii. part
iii. In his Letters and Notes on the North American Indians
(Letter No. 17) Catlin comments on the failure of the
Indians to make any use of salt, even in localities where it
abounds. See supra, 161.

[284] The relations supposed to exist between the Indians
and the devil have been referred to in a previous note,
supra, 150. It is, however, a somewhat curious fact that the
aboriginal hierarchy, suggested in the text, had a few years
before found its exact political counterpart in the talk of the
English people. “‘Who governs the land?’ it was asked.
‘Why, the King.’ ‘And who governs the King?’ ‘Why, the
Duke of Buckingham.’ ‘And who governs the Duke?’

Page 374

‘Why, the Devil.’” (Ewald’s Stories from the State Papers,
vol. ii. p. 117.)

[285] “Sed quoniam, (ut præclare scriptum est a Platone)
non nobis solum nati sumus, ortusque nostri partem patria,
vindicat, partem amici.” De Officiis, Lib. i. § 7. The words
“partem parentes” are not in the original, but have been
inserted by modern scholars as rendering the quotation
from Plato more correct.

[286] In annotating this chapter I have been indebted to
Professors Asa Gray and C. S. Sargent of Harvard
University for assistance, they having sent me several of
the more technical notes. This and the five following
chapters of the New Canaan have a certain interest as being
among the earliest memoranda on the trees, animals, birds,
fish and geology of Massachusetts. The only earlier
publication of at all a similar character is Wood’s New
England’s Prospect, which appeared in 1634, and contained
the result of observations made during the four years 1629
to 1633. Morton’s acquaintance with the country was
earlier and longer than Wood’s, but the New Canaan was
not published until three years after the Prospect, which it
followed closely in its description of the country and its
products. Josselyn’s first voyage was made in 1638, and his
stay in New England covered a period of fifteen months,
July, 1638, to October, 1639. His second visit was in 1663,
and lasted until 1671. The New England’s Rarities was
published in 1672, and the Two Voyages in 1674. Josselyn’s
alone of these works can make any pretence to a scientific
character or nomenclature, but the four taken together
constitute the whole body of early New England natural
history and geology. Only occasional reference to this class
of subjects is found in other writers.

Page 375

[287] The White Oake includes, no doubt, Quercus alba
and bicolor, and the Redd Oake, Quercus rubra, tinctoria
and coccinea.

[288] Edward Williams, in his Virginia (iii. Force’s Tracts,
No. 11. p. 14), written in 1650, says: “Nor are Pipestaves
and Clapboard a despicable commodity, of which one man
may with ease make fifteen thousand yearely, which in the
countrey itselfe are sold for 4 l. in the Canaries for twenty
pound the thousand, and by this means the labour of one
man will yeeld him 60 l. per annum, at the lowest Market.”

[289] Probably Fraxinus Americana, although two other
species of Ash are common in Massachusetts, the Red and
the Black Ash (F. pubescens and sambucifolia).

[290] It is interesting to note that, at this early day, two
forms of our one species of Beech were distinguished by
the color of the wood, a distinction which has often been
adopted by Botanists and is still considered by mechanics
and woodsmen.

[291] This refers, no doubt, to our different species of
Hickory, although the Butternut (Juglans cinerea) is
common in Massachusetts.

[292] Both the White and the Pitch Pine (Pinus strobus, and
rigida) are probably referred to.

[293] “For I have seene of these stately high growne trees,
ten miles together close by the River side, from whence by
shipping they might be conveyed to any desired Port.”
(Wood’s New England’s Prospect, p. 15.)

Page 376

[294] The Red Cedar (Juniperus virginia).

[295] This is clearly a contemptuous reference to Wood,
who in his Prospect (p. 15) had said, “The Cedar tree is a
tree of no great growth, not bearing above a foote and a
halfe square at the most, neither is it very high. I suppose
they be much inferiour to the Cedars of Lebenon, so much
commended in holy writ.”

[296] Supra, 173.

[297] The White Cedar (Chamaecyparis thyoides); or
perhaps Arbor-Vitæ (Thuja occindentalis), which is the
“more bewtifull tree.”

[298] A misprint for Gerard, whose Herball, or Generall
Historie of Plants, was published in 1597, and Johnson’s
edition of it in 1633.

[299] This probably includes both the Black Spruce (Picea
nigra) and the Hemlock (Truga canadensis).

[300] “Spruce is a goodly Tree, of which they make Masts
for Ships, and Sail Yards: It is generally conceived by those
that have skill in Building of Ships, that here is absolutely
the best Trees in the World, many of them being three
Fathom about, and of great length.” (Josselyn, Rarities, p.
63.) “At Pascataway there is now a Spruce-tree brought
down to the water-side by our Mass-men of an incredible
bigness, and so long that no Skipper durst ever yet
adventure to ship it, but there it lyes and Rots.” (Two
Voyages, p. 67.)

[301] [whether.] See supra, 111, note 1.

Page 377

[302] Probably the Sugar, Red and White Maples are
intended: Acer saccharinum, rubrum and dasycarpum. It is
singular that no reference to the manufacture of maple
sugar by the Indians occurs.

[303] (Elder) Sambucus Canadensis.

[304] Wood (Prospect, p. 15) says, “Two sorts, Red and
White.” None of our native Grape vines bear White grapes.

[305] Supra, 173.

[306] Perhaps our little Beach plum (P. maritima) is
intended. The wild American Plum-tree is probably not a
native of Massachusetts, although it was early cultivated by
the aborigines and settlers.

[307] (Sassafras officinale.)

[308] The Ginseng (Aralia quinquefolia), or the Wild
Sarsaparilla (Aralia nudicaulis).

[309] In Chapter IX. of this Book (infra, *94) Morton again
refers to the growth of hemp in New England, as evidence
of the fertility of the soil. He declares “that it shewteth up
to be tenne foote high and tenne foote and a halfe.” Thomas
Wiggin, also, in writing of New England in November,
1632, says: “As good hempe and fflax as in any parte of the
world, growes there naturally.” (iii. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol.
viii. p. 322.) Hemp, however, is not native to New England
or America. That spoken of must have been grown from
seed brought over by the colonists. Morton may have seen
it growing in garden soil at Plymouth and Wessagusset, but

Page 378

that any field of it ever reached a height of ten or ten and a
half feet in eastern Massachusetts is very questionable.

[310] Professor Gray of Harvard University has furnished
me the following note on this chapter:—
“Unlike Josselyn, the author evidently was not an herbalist,
and wrote at random. His pot-marjoram, thyme and balm,
though not to be specifically identified, and none of them of
the same species as in England, must be represented by our
American pennyroyal (Hedeoma pulegioides), a native mint
(Mentha borealis), wild basil (Pycnanthemum), and a
species of Monarda, sometimes called balm, all sweet herbs
of the New England coast. Alexander is hardly to be
guessed. Angelica as a genus occurs here, but not the
officinal species. Wild sarsaparilla (Aralia nudicaulis) was
probably in view. Purslane is interesting in this connection,
adding as it does to the probability that this plant was in the
country before the settlement. There are no Anniseeds in
New England, and it is impossible to guess what the author
meant. It was probably a random statement founded on
nothing in particular. The Honeysuckles were doubtless the
two species of Azalea to which the name is still applied.”
Wood also says (Prospect, pp. 11, 12), “There is likewise
growing all manner of Hearbes for meate and medicine,
and not only in planted Gardens, but in the woods, without
either the art or helpe of man, as sweete Marjoram,
Purselane, Sorrell, Peneriall, Yarrow, Myrtle, Saxifarilla,
Bayes, &c.” See also Mr. Tuckerman’s introductory matter
and notes, in his edition of New England’s Rarities [1865],
and Professor Gray’s chapter (vol. i. ch. ii.) on the Flora of
Boston and vicinity, and the changes it has undergone, in
the Memorial History of Boston.

[311] For the greater part of the notes to this chapter, and
for all those of a technical character, I am indebted to Mr.
William Brewster, of Cambridge. To his notes I have added

Page 379

a few references to, and extracts from, other early works
more or less contemporaneous with the New Canaan.

[312] Probably the Whistling Swan (Cygnus Americanus),
now a rare visitor to New England. Wood, also, in his
poetical enumeration of birds and fowls (Prospect, p. 23),
speaks of
“The Silver Swan that tunes her mournfull breath,
To sing the dirge of her approaching death.”
Further on (p. 26) he says, “There be likewise many
Swannes which frequent the fresh ponds and rivers,
seldome consorting themselves with Duckes and Geese;
these be very good meate, the price of one is six shillings.”
In his enumeration of birds of New England, Josselyn (Two
Voyages, p. 100) mentions “Hookers or wild-Swans.” This
bird is not included in Peabody’s Report on the Ornithol. of
Massachusetts (1839).

[313] The Brant (Bernicla brenta), common at the present
day.

[314] The Snow Goose (Anser hyperboreus), now rare in
New England, although common throughout the West.

[315] The Canada Goose (Bernicla Canadensis).

[316] The Black Duck (Anas obscura), still abundant. The
identity of the other two is doubtful: the Pide Duck may
have been the Pied or Labrador Duck (Camptolæmus
Labradorius), a species formerly common but now nearly if
not wholly extinct; the Gray Duck is probably the Pintail
(Dafila acuta).

[317] The Green-winged Teal (Querquedula Carolinensis)
and the Blue-winged Teal (Querquedula discors), both

Page 380

noted for the delicacy of their flesh.

[318] Probably the American Widgeon, or Baldpate
(Mareca Americana). The name Widgeon is sometimes
applied to other species, however.

[319] Probably some species of web-footed bird, but
exactly what is not clear. Mr. Merriam, in his Review of the
Birds of Connecticut (pp. 104-5), identifies Morton’s Simpe
as the American Woodcock (Philohela minor), but in this
he is doubtless in error. In the first place, it is not likely that
a keen sportsman like Morton would have shot woodcock
merely out of curiosity, and “more did not regard them;” in
the second place, Josselyn, in enumerating the different
sorts of ducks, speaks of “Widgeons, Simps, Teal, Blew
wing’d and green wing’d.” (Two Voyages, p. 101.) But for
the reference in the next paragraph in the text, and the
disparaging manner in which the bird in question is alluded
to, it would be inferred that Simpes was a natural misprint
for Snipes. That, however, is clearly not the case.

[320] The Sanderling (Calidris arenaria), a common
Sandpiper, peculiar in lacking the usual hind toe. The
context indicates that other shore birds were included under
this name. “There are little Birds that frequent the Sea-
shore in flocks called Sanderlins, they are about the bigness
of a Sparrow, and in the fall of the leaf will be all fat; when
I was first in the Countrie the English cut them into small
pieces to put into their Puddings instead of suet. I have
known twelve score and above kill’d at two shots.”
(Josselyn’s Two Voyages, p. 102.) To precisely the same
effect Wood says (Prospect, p. 27), “I myselfe have killed
twelve score at two shootes.”

[321] Neither the Whooping Crane (Grus Americana) nor
the Sandhill Crane (Grus pratensis) is now found in New

Page 381

England. The latter is probably the species referred to here.
Our large Heron (Ardea herodias) is often called Crane by
country people, but it does not eat corn, and “in a dishe”
would hardly be considered “a goodly bird.”

[322] The Wild Turkey (Meleagris gallipavo Americana) is
mentioned by all the early writers as an abundant bird; but
it disappeared almost as rapidly as the Indians, before the
encroachment of the white settlers. Peabody, writing in
1839 (Report on the Fishes, Reptiles, and Birds of
Massachusetts, p. 352), says: “It is still found occasionally
in our western mountains, and also on the Holyoke range,
where some are taken every year.” Its total extinction
probably occurred only a few years later.

[323] Probably an exaggeration, although Audubon
mentions one that weighed thirty-six pounds; the ordinary
weight of the full-grown male is from fifteen to twenty
pounds, a gobbler weighing twenty-five pounds being an
unusually large bird. Yet Morton’s statement is fully borne
out by other contemporary authorities. Wood says, “The
Turky is a very large bird, of a blacke colour, yet white in
flesh; much bigger then our English Turky. He hath the use
of his long legs so ready, that he can runne as fast as a
Dogge, and flye as well as a Goose: of these sometimes
there will be forty, three-score and an hundred of a flocke,
sometimes more and sometimes lesse; their feeding is
Acorns, Hawes, and Berries, some of them get a haunt to
frequent our English corne: In Winter when the Snow
covers the ground, they resort to the Sea-shore to looke for
Shrimps, and such small fishes at low tides. Such as love
Turkie hunting must follow it in Winter after a new falne
Snow, when he may follow them by their tracts; some have
killed ten or a dozen in halfe a day; if they can be found
towards an evening, and watched where they peirch, if one
came about ten or eleaven of the clocke, he may shoote as
often as he will, they will sit, unlesse they be slenderly

Page 382

wounded. These Turkies remain all the yeare long. The
price of a good Turkie cocke is foure shillings: and he is
well worth it, for he may be in weight forty pound; a Hen
two shillings.” (New England’s Prospect, p. 24.) So also
Josselyn: “I have heard several credible persons affirm,
they have seen Turkie Cocks that have weighed forty, yea
sixty pounds; but out of my personal experimental
knowledge I can assure you, that I have eaten my share of a
Turkie Cock, that when he was pull’d and garbidg’d,
weighed thirty pound.” He adds, however, that even then
[1670] “the English and the Indians having now destroyed
the breed, so that ’tis very rare to meet with a wild Turkie in
the Woods.” (New England’s Rarities, p. 9.) See also Two
Voyages, p. 99, where the same writer says: “If you would
preserve the young Chickens alive, you must give them no
water, for if they come to have their fill of water, they will
drop away strangely, and you will never be able to rear any
of them.” John Clayton, in his Letter to the Royal Society
[1688], says of Virginia: “There be wild Turkies extream
large; they talk of Turkies that have been kill’d, that have
weigh’d betwixt 50 and 60 Pound weight; the largest that
ever I saw, weigh’d something better than 38 Pound.” (iii.
Force’s Tracts, No. 12, p. 30.) Williams, in his Virginia
[1650], speaks of “infinites of wilde Turkeyes, which have
been knowne to weigh fifty pound weight, ordinarily forty.”
(iii. Force’s Tracts, No. 11, p. 12.) See also Strachey’s
Historie, p. 125; Young’s Chron. of Mass., p. 253.

[324] In regard to this expression Mr. Trumbull writes:
“Metawna is mittànnug (R. Williams), muttannunk (Eliot),
—Englished by ‘a thousand;’ but to the Indians less
definite, ‘a great many,’ more than he could count. Neent is
possibly a misprint for necut (nequt, Eliot), ‘one,’—but,
more likely, stands for ‘I have,’ or its equivalent, ‘there is to
me.’ Roger Williams (p. 164) puts the numeral first,

Page 383

nneesnneánna, ‘I have killed two,’—shwinneánna, [‘I have
killed] three,’” &c.

[325] The Pheasant of Morton and other early writers has
been supposed by ornithologists to be the Prairie Hen or
Pinnated Grouse (Cupidonia cupido), a species which,
however, has dark not “white flesh,”—“formerly ... so
common on the ancient busky site of the city of Boston,
that laboring people or servants stipulated with their
employers, not to have the Heath-Hen brought to table
oftener then a few times in the week.” (Nuttall’s
Ornithology, vol. i. p. 800.) There is good evidence that this
bird once ranged over a large part of Southern New
England; it is still found on Martha’s Vineyard, where it is
carefully protected and is not uncommon. Elsewhere it does
not now occur much to the eastward of Illinois.

[326] The Ruffed Grouse (Bonasa umbella).

[327] The American Partridge, Quail, or Bob White (Ortyx
Virginiana).

[328] Of doubtful application. Our Horned Lark
(Eremophila alpestris) is the nearest North American ally
of the English Skylark, but it is so differently colored that
Morton probably had in mind some other species, perhaps
the Titlark (Anthus ludovicianus).

[329] Three species of Crows are found in New England:
the Raven (Corvus carnivorus), now confined to the
northern parts of Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont; the
Common Crow (Corvus Americanus); and the Fish Crow
(Corvus ossifragus), which occasionally wanders to
Massachusetts from its true home in the Middle and
Southern States. The latter may have been the Rook.
“Kight” is a dubious appellation, possibly referring to the

Page 384

Swallow-tailed Kite (Nauclerus furcatus), now a rare
straggler from the South, but formerly, as some
ornithologists believe, of regular occurrence in New
England.

[330] The descriptions given for these Hawks are too vague
to be of much use in determining species. A clew is often
furnished by familiar terms of falconry, which, we may
assume, would be naturally applied to American
representatives of Old World forms. Morton, however, uses
these terms very loosely, or, perhaps, with a regard to fine
distinctions of meaning not now understood. In such a case
nothing can be done beyond pointing out their accepted
significance and probable application.

[331] The male of Falco lanarius, a Falcon found in the
southern and south-eastern parts of Europe, as well as in
Western Asia and the adjoining portions of Africa. An
American variety, the Prairie Falcon (Falco lanarius
polyagrus), has a wide range in the West, but is not known
to have occurred to the eastward of Illinois. The bird
referred to by Morton is doubtless the Duck Hawk (Falco
peregrinus), an allied species not uncommon in New
England.

[332] In the records of the Council for New England, under
date of the 26th of November, 1635, or about the time that
Morton was writing the New Canaan, is the following
entry: “The Hawks brought over by Capt. Smart are to be
presented to his Majesty on Saturday next, by the Lords of
those Provinces. And the said Captain to be recommended
to his Majestys service upon occasion of employments for
his care and industry used to bring them over, and for other
his services done in those parts.”

[333] The Cockchafer.

Page 385

[334] I. e., like the Buzzard-Hawks of the genus Buteo, a
sluggish tribe of Raptores.

[335] Properly of general application to the genus Falco; if
used specifically here there is no clew to its precise
meaning.

[336] Usually written tercel, and sometimes tiercel or
tiërcel. The male of any hawk, so termed because he is a
third smaller than the female, or, as some have thought,
because it was believed that every third bird hatched was a
male. The name, as used in falconry, almost always refers
to the male Goshawk (Astur palumbarius), while with the
addition of gentil, or gentle, it indicated the female or
young of this species. The bird alluded to here is probably
the American Goshawk (Astur atricapillus).

[337] The American Sparrow Hawk (Falco sparverius), a
small and richly colored Falcon, would be likely to be used
for such a purpose.

[338] If not applied to the male Goshawk (see note on
“tassel gentles”), perhaps referring to Hawks of the genus
Buteo, represented in New England by three species, Buteo
borealis, B. lineatus and B. Pennsylvanicus.

[339] If Morton always uses tassel in its commonly
accepted sense (see preceding notes), another application
must be sought for the present name. The accompanying
text may relate to the Marsh Hawk (Circus cyaneus
Hudsonius), the adult male of which is our whitest New
England Hawk, and the young or female perhaps the
reddest. The Marsh Hawk does not prey on full-grown
poultry, but it may have been credited with depredations

Page 386

committed by other species, a piece of injustice by no
means uncommon at the present day.

[340] The Pigeon Hawk (Falco columbarius) is the New
England representative of the European Merlin (Falco
regulus).

[341] Probably the Crow Blackbird (Quiscalus purpureus
æneus).

[342] The Sharp-shinned Hawk (Accipiter fuscus), a
common New England species closely allied to the
European Sparrow Hawk (Accipiter nisus). Our Cooper’s
Hawk (Accipiter cooperi) also may be referred to under this
name.

[343] The Ruby-throated Humming-bird (Trochilus
colubris), our only New England species. The Humming-
birds are peculiar to the New World; hence the wonder and
interest with which they were regarded by the early
explorers and colonists. There is a letter from Emanuel
Downing to John Winthrop, Jr., of the 21st of November,
1632, in which is this paragraph: “You have a litle bird in
your contrie that makes a humminge noyse, a little bigger
then a bee, I pray send me one of them over, perfect in his
fethers, in a little box.” (iv. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. vi. p.
40e.) There are many descriptions of this bird in the earlier
writers, though none that I have found so early as
Downing’s letter. Wood says: “The Humbird is one of the
wonders of the Countrey, being no bigger than a Hornet,
yet hath all the dimensions of a Bird, as bill and wings,
with quils, Spider-like legges, small clawes: For colour,
shee is glorious as the Raine-bow; as shee flies, shee makes
a little humming noise like a humble bee: wherefore she is
called the Humbird.” (New England’s Prospect, p. 24.)
Josselyn’s description is especially good: “The Humming

Page 387

Bird, the least of all Birds, little bigger than a Dor, of
variable glittering Colours, they feed upon Honey, which
they suck out of Blossoms and Flowers with their long
Needle-like Bills; they sleep all Winter, and are not to be
seen till the Spring, at which time they breed in little Nests,
made up like a bottom of soft, Silk-like matter, their Eggs
no bigger than a white Pease, they hatch three or four at a
time, and are proper to this Country.” (New England’s
Rarities, p. 6.) See also Clayton’s Letter, &c. (iii. Force’s
Tracts, No. 12, p. 33).

[344] For all the technical and scientific notes to this
chapter I am indebted to Mr. Joel A. Allen, of the Museum
of Comparative Zoölogy of Harvard College. To the matter
contributed by him I have merely added, as in the
immediately preceding chapters, extracts from other
writers, more or less contemporaneous with Morton, which
seemed to me to be illustrative of the text, or in the same
spirit with it. This chapter of Morton’s is more complete,
though probably of less value, than Wood’s and Josselyn’s
chapters on the same subject.

[345] The Elke here mentioned is the Moose (Alces
malchis) of American writers; it is specifically the same as
the elk of Northern Europe. From Wood’s account (New
England’s Prospect, p. 18), it would seem that the moose in
Morton’s time ranged into eastern Massachusetts, though
not found now south of northern Maine. The moose has but
a single fawn at a birth, not three as stated in the text.
Mr. Allen then adds to the above note: “I have met with no
published record of the occurrence of the American Elk, or
Wapiti Deer (Cervus Canadensis), in eastern
Massachusetts. Since publishing a statement to this effect
(Mem. Hist. Boston, vol. i. p. 10), however, I have learned
through the kindness of a correspondent (Henry S. Nourse,
Esq., of South Lancaster, Mass.,) that early in the

Page 388

eighteenth century sixteen elk were seen near a brook in
South Lancaster, one of which was killed. The tradition is
supported by the fact that the antlers of the individual killed
were preserved in the family of the lucky hunter (Jonas
Fairbanks) for a long period, and afterwards placed on the
top of a guide-board, where they still remain, moss-grown
and weather-worn by eighty years of sun and storm. Since
the receipt of Mr. Nourse’s letter (dated Feb. 25, 1882), his
account has been corroborated by information from another
source. That the antlers mentioned belonged to an elk and
not to a moose is beyond question.”

[346] “The English have some thoughts of keeping them
tame, and to accustome them to the yoake, which will be a
great commoditie: First, because they are so fruitfull,
bringing forth three at a time, being likewise very uberous.
Secondly, because they will live in Winter without any
fodder. There be not many of these in the Massachusetts
Bay, but forty miles to the Northeast there be great store of
them.” (New England’s Prospect, p. 18.) There are very
good descriptions of the Moose, and the methods pursued
in hunting them, in Gorges’s Brief Relation (ii. Mass. Hist.
Coll., vol. ix. p. 18) and in Josselyn’s Two Voyages, (pp. 88,
137). See, also, New England’s Rarities, p. 19.

[347] The common Virginian Deer (Cariacus Virginianus),
formerly more or less abundant throughout the eastern half
of the United States.

[348] The number of fawns produced at a birth is
commonly two, sometimes one, and still more rarely three;
although three is stated to be the usual number in various
seventeenth-century accounts of the natural productions of
New England, Virginia, &c.

Page 389

[349] Mourt, in his Relation (p. 8), records how Governor
William Bradford, of Plymouth, was caught in one of these
traps, and “horsed up by the leg,” when the first party from
the Mayflower was exploring Cape Cod in November,
1620. Wood says: “An English Mare being strayed from her
owner, and growne wild by her long sojourning in the
woods ranging up and down with the wild crew, stumbled
into one of these traps which stopt her speed, hanging her
like Mahomet’s tombe, betwixt earth and heaven; the
morning being come the Indians went to looke what good
successe their Venison trapps had brought them, but seeing
such a long scutted Deere, praunce in their Meritotter, they
bade her good morrow, crying out, what cheere what
cheere, Englishmans squaw horse; having no better epithete
than to call her a woman horse, but being loath to kill her,
and as fearefull to approach neere the friscadoes of her Iron
heeles, they posted to the English to tell them how the case
stood or hung with their squaw horse, who unhorsed their
Mare, and brought her to her former tamenesse, which
since hath brought many a good foale, and performed much
good service.” (New England’s Prospect, p. 75.) Williams,
in his Key (ch. xxvii.), describes how the deer caught in
these traps were torn and devoured by wolves before the
Indians came to secure them. See, also, Colonel Norwood’s
Voyage to Virginia. (iii. Force’s Tracts, No. 10, p. 39.)

[350] Wesil, obsolete for weasand.

[351] The “third sort of Deere,” of which the author
evidently had no personal knowledge, is doubtless a myth,
as the Virginia Deer is the only species of small deer found
in the United States, south of New England, east of the
Mississippi River. The statement that it is “lesse then the
other” (i. e. Virginian Deer), together with the southern
habitat assigned it, preclude reference to the Caribou of

Page 390

northern New England, which the name “rayne deare”
otherwise suggests.

[352] “They desire to be neare the Sea, so that they may
swimme to the Islands when they are chased by the
Woolves.” (New England’s Prospect, p. 18.) Deer Island is
consequently a very common name along the New England
coast; and of the island bearing that name in Boston harbor,
now the site of the city reformatory institutions, Wood says:
“This Iland is so called, because of the Deare which often
swimme thither from the Maine, when they are chased by
the woolves: some have killed sixteene Deere in a day upon
this Iland.” Young’s Chron. of Mass., p. 405. See, also,
Shurtleff’s Description of Boston, p. 464.

[353] The Beaver (Castor fiber). The account of the way
“they draw the logg to the habitation appoynted” is a
fanciful exaggeration, hardly less ridiculous than the
preceding statement about the precaution the animal takes
in winter to preserve his tail!
Cunny, mentioned in the first paragraph, is doubtless a
seventeenth-century barbarism for cony, a name at this time
commonly applied to the rabbit. The context, both here and
in the account of the muskewashe, seems to imply this,
although the word is correctly written cony in the paragraph
relating to Hares. In some of the early accounts of Virginia,
published in the first half of the seventeenth century, hares
and cunnies are enumerated in the lists of animals, where
the latter name evidently means cony or rabbit. Serat, in the
same paragraph, is a term of much greater obscurity of
application.

[354] “The tail, as I have said in another Treatise, is very
fat and of a masculine vertue, as good as Eringo’s or
Satyrion-Roots.” (Josselyn’s Two Voyages, p. 93.)

Page 391

[355] Bradford, writing of the year 1636, gives the
following prices: “The coat beaver usualy at 20s. per
pound, and some at 24s.; the skin at 15 and sometimes 16. I
doe not remember any under 14. It may be the last year
might be something lower” (p. 346). In 1671 Josselyn says:
“A black Bears Skin heretofore was worth forty shillings,
now you may have one for ten.” (Rarities, p. 14.) The
following prices were named as ruling in Virginia in 1650;
(iii. Force’s Tracts, No. 11, p. 52.)
“Sables, from 8s. the payre, to 20s. a payre.
“Otter skins, from 3s. to 5s. a piece.
“Luzernes, from 2s. to 10. a piece.
“Martins the best, 4s. a piece.
“Fox skins, 6d. a piece.
“Muske Rats skins, 2s. a dozen.
“Bever skins that are full growne, in season, are worth 7s. a
piece.
“Bever skins, not in season, to allow two skins for one, and
of the lesser, three for one.
“Old Bever skins in mantles, gloves or caps, the more
worne the better, so they be full of fur, the pound weight is
6s.” See infra, 207, note 4, and also *80.

[356] The servant here referred to was probably Walter
Bagnall, of Richmond Island, who was killed by Indians,
Oct. 3, 1631. See infra, 218, note 1.

[357] The common Otter (Lutra Canadensis), now of rare
occurrence in the more settled parts of southern New
England.

Page 392

[358] The Luseran, or Luseret, is the Bay Lynx, or Wild-cat
(Lynx rufus).
“The Ounce or the wild Cat, is as big as a mungrell dogge;
this creature is by nature feirce, and more dangerous to bee
met withall than any other creature, not feering either
dogge or man; he useth to kill Deere which he thus
effecteth: Knowing the Deeres tracts, he will lie lurking in
long weedes, the Deere passing by he suddenly leapes upon
his backe, from thence gets to his necke, and scratcheth out
his throate: he hath likewise a devise to get Geese, for
being much of the colour of a Goose, he will place himselfe
close by the water, holding up his bob taile, which is like a
Goose necke; the Geese seeing this counterfeiting Goose,
approch nigh to visit him, who with a sudden jerke
apprehends his mistrustlesse prey.” (New England’s
Prospect, pp. 19, 20.) Josselyn says: “I once found six
whole Ducks in the belly of one I killed by a Pond side.”
(Rarities, p. 16.)

[359] The Martin. Under this name are doubtless
confounded the Marten (Mustela Americana) and the Fisher
(M. Pennanti). The size, however, even in case the Fisher
alone were referred to, is greatly overstated.

[360] The Racowne is the common well-known Raccoon
(Procyon lotor).

[361] Josselyn says of the Raccoon: “their grease is
soveraign for wounds with bruises, aches, streins, bruises;
and to anoint after broken bones and dislocations.” (Two
Voyages, p. 85.) A little further on (p. 92) he notes: “One
Mr. Purchase cured himself of the Sciatica with Bears-
greese, keeping some of it continually in his groine.”

Page 393

[362] The Redd Fox is our common Red Fox (Vulpes
vulgaris, var. Pennsylvanicus). The Gray Fox is doubtless
the Virginian or Gray Fox (Urocyon cinereoargentatus) of
the South and West, an animal formerly occurring in New
England but long since nearly extirpated. This is inferred
from Josselyn’s account of the Jaccal (New England’s
Rarities, p. 22), rather than from any clew given in
Morton’s text. The absence of strong scent referred to
relates to the Gray Fox, a character mentioned by Josselyn
in his brief but sufficiently explicit description of his
Jaccal.

[363] “The Indians say they have black foxes, which they
have often seen, but never could take any of them. They say
they are Manittóoes, that is Gods, spirits, or divine powers,
as they say of every thing which they cannot comprehend.”
(Williams’s Key, ch. xvii.) The black fox-skin, Josselyn
says (Rarities, p. 21), “heretofore was wont to be valued at
fifty and sixty pound, but now you may have them for
twenty shillings; indeed there is not any in New England
that are perfectly black, but silver hair’d, that is sprinkled
with gray hairs.” The black wolf’s skin, he says (ib. p. 16),
“is worth a Beaver Skin among the Indians, being highly
esteemed for helping old Aches in old people, worn as a
Coat.” Of the foxes Wood remarks: “Some of these be
blacke; their furre is of much esteeme.” (Prospect, p. 19.)
Elsewhere he says that the fur of a black wolf was “worth
five or sixe pounds Sterling.” (Ib. 20.)
See, also, supra, 205, note 2.

[364] The Wolf is the large Gray Wolf (Canis lupus),
formerly abundant throughout New England, and well
known to vary in color as mentioned by Morton.

Page 394

[365] “They be made much like a Mungrell, being big
boned, lanke paunched, deepe breasted, having a thicke
necke and head, pricke eares, and long snoute, with
dangerous teeth, long staring haire, and a great bush taile....
It is observed that they have no joynts from their head to
the taile, which prevents them from leaping or sudden
turning.” (New England’s Prospect, p. 20.) See Josselyn’s
Rarities, p. 14, and Two Voyages, p. 83. He says: “They
commonly go in routs, a rout of Wolves is 12 or more,
sometimes by couples.” Of the Virginia species, Clayton
says: “Wolves there are great store; you may hear a
Company Hunting in an Evening, and yelping like a pack
of Beagles; but they are very cowardly, and dare scarce
venture on anything that faces them; yet if hungry will pull
down a good large Sheep that flies from them. I never
heard that any of them adventured to set on Man or Child.”
(iii. Force’s Tracts, No. 12, p. 37.) According to Strachey,
these Virginia wolves were “not much bigger then English
foxes.” (Historie, p. 125.) Wood, however, says that the
Massachusetts wolves cared “no more for an ordinary
Mastiffe, than an ordinary Mastiffe cares for a Curre; many
good dogges have been spoyled by them.” Shortly after the
landing from the Mayflower at Plymouth, John Goodman,
one evening in January, “went abroad to use his lame feet,
that were pitifully ill with the cold he had got, having a
little spaniel with him. A little way from the plantation two
great wolves ran after the dog; the dog ran to him and
betwixt his legs for succour. He had nothing in his hand,
but took up a stick and threw at one of them and hit him,
and they presently ran both away, but came again. He got a
pale-board in his hand; and they set both on their tails
grinning at him a good while; and went their way and left
him.” (Young’s Chron. of Pilg., p. 178.)

[366] Supra, 205, note 2, and 207, note 4.

Page 395

[367] The common Black Bear (Ursus Americanus).

[368] “For Beares they be common, being a great black
kind of Beare, which be most fierce in Strawberry time, at
which time they have young ones; at this time likewise they
will goe upright like a man, and clime trees, and swim to
the Islands: which if the Indians see, there will be more
sportful Beare bayting than Paris Garden can afford. For
seeing the Beares take water, an Indian will leape after him,
where they goe to water cuffes for bloody noses, and
scratched sides; in the end the man gets the victory, riding
the Beare over the watery plaine till he can beare him no
longer.” (New England’s Prospect, p. 17.) “He makes his
Denn amongst thick Bushes, thrusting in here and there
store of moss, which being covered with snow and melting
in the daytime with heat of the Sun, in the night is frozen
into a thick coat of Ice; the mouth of his Den is very
narrow, here they lye single, never two in a Den all winter.
The Indian as soon as he finds them, creeps in upon all
four, seizes with his left hand upon the neck of the sleeping
Bear, drags him to the mouth of the Den, where with a club
or small hatchet in his right hand he knocks out his brains
before he can open his eyes to see his enemy.” (Two
Voyages, p. 91.) Wood adds that bear’s flesh was
“accounted very good meete, esteemed of all men above
Venison.” Clayton says that “their flesh is commended for a
very rich sort of Pork.” (Virginia, iii. Force’s Tracts No. 12,
p. 37.) “Beares there be manie towardes the sea-coast,
which the Indians hunt most greedily; for indeed they love
them above all other their flesh, and therefore hardly sell
any of them unto us, unles upon large proffers of copper,
beads and hatchetts. We have eaten of them, and they are
very toothsome sweet venison, as good to be eaten as the
flesh of a calfe of two yeares old; howbeit they are very
little in comparison of those of Muscovia and Tartaria.”

Page 396

(Strachey’s Historie, p. 123.) See, also, Josselyn’s New
England’s Rarities, pp. 13-14, and Two Voyages, pp. 91-2.

[369] The well-known Muskrat or Musquash (Fiber
zibethicus) of our ponds. The “stones” are the oder glands.
In respect to Cunny, see supra 204, note 2.

[370] The Porcupine is the Canadian Porcupine (Erethizon
dorsatus).

[371] The Hedgehogg is the same as the Porcupine, the
author being in error in regarding it as “of the like nature to
our English Hedgehoggs.” The English Hedgehog belongs
to a very different order of mammals, and has no
representative in America.

[372] The Conyes are Hares, the small ones of the
“Southerne parts” being the little Gray Hare or Wood
Rabbit (Lepus sylvaticus) of southern New England. Those
of “the North” are the Varying Hare (Lepus Americanus), or
White Rabbit, which is brown in summer and white in
winter. The reference to black ones is an error, wild black
hares being unknown except in cases of Melanism, which
are of extremely rare occurrence. We have no species of
hare which is black. Rabbit, it may be added, is a name not
strictly applicable to any indigenous mammal of America, it
being the vernacular specific designation of an Old World
species of hare.

[373] The “Squirils of three sorts” are (1) the Gray Squirrel
(Sciurus Carolinensis); (2) the Red Squirrel, or Chickaree
(S. Hudsonius); (3) the Flying Squirrel (Sciuropterus
volucellus). A fourth kind, the Striped Squirrel, or
Chipmunk (Tamias striatus) is not mentioned. The “batlike
winges” are of course neither batlike, nor even wings at all,

Page 397

but merely a narrow furred membrane extending along the
sides of the body, from the fore to the hind limbs.

[374] [and] See supra, 111, note 1.

[375] “1639. May, which fell out to be extream hot and
foggie, about the middle of May, I kill’d within a stones
throw of our house, above four score Snakes, some of them
as big as the small of my leg, black of colour, and three
yards long, with a sharp horn on the tip of their tail two
inches in length.” (Josselyn’s Two Voyages, pp. 22-3.)

[376] Mr. J. H. Trumbull writes: “Morton’s ascowke is
Eliot’s askook, R. Williams’s askùg, ‘a snake.’ In
Zeifberger’s Delaware, achgook; whence (through
Heckewelder) Cooper’s Chingachgook, ‘the Great Serpent,’
in the Last of the Mohicans.”

[377] Williams, in his Key, gives the name as Sések. See,
also, Mr. Trumbull’s note in his edition of the Key (p. 130),
in the publications of the Narragansett Society. Wood gives
it as seasicke. (Prospect, p. 86.)

[378] The stories first told in Europe of the Rattlesnake
(Crotalus durissus) were of the most exaggerated kind. He
was described as a reptile of prodigious size, which could
fly, and which poisoned by its breath. (New England’s
Prospect, p. 39.) The first mention of this snake in
Massachusetts is found in Higginson’s New England’s
Plantation [1630]. It is as follows: “This country being
very full of woods and wildernesses, doth also much
abound with snakes and serpents, of strange colors and
huge greatness. Yea, there are some serpents, called
rattlesnakes, that have rattles in their tails, that will not fly
from a man as others will, but will fly upon him and sting
him so mortally that he will die within a quarter of an hour

Page 398

after, except the party stinged have about him some of the
root of an herb called snake-weed to bite on, and then he
shall receive no harm.” (Young’s Chron. of Mass., p. 255.)
Wood gives an admirable description of the rattlesnake
(Prospect, pp. 38-9), and also speaks of “the Antidote to
expel the poyson, which is a root caled Snake weede, which
must be champed, the spittle swallowed, and the roote
applied to the sore.... Five or six men have been bitten by
them, which by using of snakeweede were all cured, never
any yet losing his life by them.” Josselyn, in his Rarities (p.
39), says: “The Indians when weary with travelling, will
take them up with their bare hands, laying hold with one
hand behind their Head, with the other taking hold of their
Tail, and with their teeth tear off the Skin of their backs,
and feed upon them alive; which they say refresheth them.”
He further says that the heart of the rattlesnake “swallowed
fresh” (Rarities, p. 39), or “dried and pulverized and drunk
with wine or beer” (Voyages, p. 114), is an antidote against
its poison. In Clayton’s Virginia (iii. Force’s Tracts, No. 12,
p. 39), there is a very entertaining passage, too long to
extract, on Rattlesnakes, and the use of East India snake-
stones “that were sent [to Virginia] by King James the
Second, the Queen, and some of the Nobility, purposely to
try their Virtue and Efficacy,” at curing the bite of vipers,
&c.

[379] The Mice, which our author found in “good store,”
belong chiefly to three species,—namely, the common
short-tailed Meadow Mouse (Arvicola riparius), the White-
footed Mouse, or Deer Mouse (Hesperomys leucopus), and
the Long-tailed Jumping Mouse, or Kangaroo Mouse
(Zapus Hudsonius). The common House Mouse (Mus
musculus) is an exotic pest, which doubtless had not at that
time made its appearance. Morton is quite right in stating:
“but for Rats, the Country by Nature is troubled with
none.” The Black Rat (Mus rattus) was quite early
introduced, but the Gray, Wharf, or Norway Rat (Mus

Page 399

decumanus) probably did not make its appearance till fully
a century after Morton wrote his New English Canaan.

[380] Morton, as was natural for a keen sportsman who had
himself been in the tropics, was wiser on the subject of
Lions than other Englishmen in New England. From the
first landing at Plymouth, when John Goodman and Peter
Browne, getting lost in the woods, heard “two lions roaring
exceedingly,” down to 1639, when Josselyn heard “of a
young Lyon (not long before) kill’d at Pascataway by an
Indian,” there were vague stories of these animals having
been either seen or heard in the New England woods.
Josselyn argued on the great probability that there were
lions because there were jackals (Rarities, p. 21); and Wood
said that “the Virginians saw an old Lyon in their
Plantation, who having lost his Iackall, which was wont to
hunt his prey, was brought so poore that he could goe no
further.” (Prospect, p. 17.) Strachey speaks of having found
the skins and claws of lions in the hands of the Indians.
(Historie, p. 124.) The animal referred to in all these cases
was doubtless the Panther or Catamount (Felis concolor).
On this subject see also Young’s Chron. of Pilg., p. 176,
note; Tuckerman’s New England’s Rarities, p. 57, note; and
the Mem. History of Boston, vol. i. p. 9.

[381] For the scientific and technical notes to this chapter I
am indebted to Professor N. S. Shaler of Harvard
University. As in the three preceding chapters, certain other
notes of my own have been added, which are of a wholly
different character, and will readily be distinguished from
Professor Shaler’s.

[382] The marble of Marble Harbor, or Marblehead, is not,
in the present sense of the word, a marble at all, but is, in
fact, a porphyry. In the old sense of the word it designated

Page 400

any smooth-striped or spotted stones, such as are found
there.

[383] No limestone, good or bad, is known to exist on the
Monatoquit now; the nearest limestone is at Bear (or Bare)
Hill, in Stoneham.

[384] There is a locality in East Braintree, included in the
Wainwright estate, at the foot of Wyman’s Hill and facing
the Weymouth Fore-river, into which the Monatoquit flows,
where is a quarry from which stone bearing some external
resemblance to limestone was formerly taken for ballast.
This place has always been locally called the Quaw, though
the origin and meaning of the name have never been
known. It would seem that this must be the place referred to
in the text, and that Quaw, or Quor, is a corruption of the
Indian Attaquatock.

[385] There are no “chalke stones” at Squanto’s Chapelle,
i.e., Squantum, or anywhere else in this part of the world.
Morton may possibly have mistaken pebbles of decayed
felspar for chalk.

[386] There is some slate in Quincy and Weymouth that
might be used for roofing, and a quarry of it was long
worked for material for gravestones, &c., on Squantum
Bay, a mile or so from Mount Wollaston; but it is slate of a
very poor sort. The nearest workable slate is in Vermont
and Maine.

[387] This passage is more than usually confused, even for
Morton. It is difficult to say whether he is perpetrating a
clumsy joke, or indulging in a malicious insinuation. John
Billington was hanged at Plymouth in September, 1630,
being apparently the second person so executed in what is
now Massachusetts, the first having been executed at

Page 401

Weymouth during the winter of 1622-3. (Infra, *108-10.)
The man shot by Billington, and for whose murder he was
hung, was John New-comin (Bradford, p. 277), whence
Morton’s play upon the name. Billington had two sons, but
he was by no means “beloved.” As Bradford, writing about
him as early as 1625, said, “he is a knave,” adding
prophetically “and so will live and die.” (Savage’s
Winthrop, vol. i. p. *36). Why Morton should have called
him “Ould Woodman” is not clear. From his immediately
going on to talk of the “woodden prospect,” and the wish of
its author to secure for himself a monopoly of the
Richmond Island whetstones, which “Ould Woodman
labored to get a patent of,” it would seem as if he had
intended to convey the idea that William Wood, the author
of the New England’s Prospect, was one of the “many
sonnes” of “Old Woodman,” who had been hanged at
Plymouth. That such was Morton’s intention, however, is
not clear. The passage is muddled, but not necessarily
malicious.

[388] The words quoted are not Ovid’s, but Virgil’s.
Eclogues, viii. 43.

[389] Supra, 124.

[390] Josselyn, in his Two Voyages (p. 202), speaks of the
“excellent whetstones” then (1670) found at Richmond
Island.
“There is a species of slate quite abundant on Richmond’s
Island, and some other Islands in Casco Bay, which has
been used for oil-stones. Josselyn, in his Voyages, says that
‘tables of slate could be got out long enough for a dozen
men to sit at.’” See a communication on this passage of the
New Canaan, signed J. P. B., in the Portland Press of
January 2, 1883. Professor Shaler adds: “It is interesting to
note the fact that Morton saw that whetstones could be

Page 402

made the basis for trade. Stones suitable for this purpose
are rare in Europe, and to-day a New Hampshire company
ships large quantities to Europe and even to Australia.”

[391] Richmond Island lies directly south-east of Cape
Elizabeth and close to it. From what Morton says in the
next chapter and elsewhere (infra, *149), it would seem
that before his arrest by Standish in June, 1628,—that is, in
the summer of 1627,—he had a fur station on the coast of
Maine. (Supra, 23.) Winthrop, writing under date of
October 22, 1631, mentions the murder of “Walter Bagnall,
called Great Watt, and one John P—— who kept with him,”
by the Indians at Richmond Island. He adds: “This Bagnall
was sometimes servant to one in the bay, and these three
years had dwelt alone in the said isle, and had gotten about
£400 most in goods. He was a wicked fellow, and had much
wronged the Indians.” (Winthrop, vol. i. p. *63). Bagnall
would, from this, appear to have been one of Morton’s
servants at Mount Wollaston, as he alone in “the bay,” at
that time, had any number of servants, or was engaged in
trade on the Maine coast. As Bagnall was killed in 1631,
and had then lived alone at Richmond Island three years, he
seems to have taken up his abode there in 1628, the time of
the breaking up of the company at Mount Wollaston by
Standish and Endicott, and the settlement at Richmond
Island was thus the Maine offshoot of that at Merry-mount.
Bagnall was probably that one of Morton’s servants who,
he says, was reputed, when he died, to have made a
thousand pounds in the fur trade in five years, “whatsoever
became of it.” (Supra, *78). Morton’s expression here of
“five years” agrees with Winthrop’s “three years,” and
confirms this surmise. Bagnall had died in 1631. Morton
had gotten control at Mount Wollaston in 1626. (Supra, 15.)
Bagnall had remained there as his servant two years, until
1628; then had been frightened away and gone to
Richmond Island, where he had lived three years more, as
Winthrop says,—making in all Morton’s five years. In his

Page 403

phrase “whatsoever became of it” Morton characteristically
throws out an insinuation in regard to Bagnall’s
possessions. He probably meant to imply some underhand
proceeding to get hold of them on the part of the
Massachusetts Bay people. Recently a theory has been
advanced in the Maine press, that Bagnall was an
Episcopalian, and competitor in trade of the Massachusetts
Company; and that Winthrop and his associates, not being
able otherwise to get rid of him, compassed his death by
indirect means. (See a letter of S. P. Mayberry in Portland
Press of Jan. 9, 1883.) Winthrop says that most of the
possessions in question were in goods. A portion would
naturally be in the form of money, and it was left for the
present generation to form a most plausible surmise as to
“whatsoever became” of some of this money. On May 11,
1855, an old stone pot was turned up by the ploughshare,
on Richmond Island, containing fifty-two coins; and Mr.
Willis, the historian of Portland, then took occasion, in a
letter to the Massachusetts Historical Society (Proceedings,
May 1857, pp. 183-8), to “express the belief that the money
[was] connected with the fate of Walter Bagnall, who was
killed by Sagamore Squidraket and his party, Oct. 3, 1631.”
There was nothing to show that any of the coins were of a
later date than 1631. A patent for Richmond Island, together
with fifteen hundred acres on the main land, was issued to
Bagnall by the Council for New England, Dec. 2, 1631, just
three months after his death. (Records of the Council, pp.
51-2.) Morton was then in England, and unquestionably in
communication with Gorges. (Supra, 49.)

[392] Doubtless the magnetic iron oxides. None of these
are known to me nearer than in the mountains forming the
westerly part of the Berkshire Hills, from New York City to
the Adirondacks, except in Cumberland, R. I., where there
is some iron of this nature.

Page 404

[393] No ironstones are known around Massachusetts bay;
the nearest deposits are in Rhode Island.

[394] Small quantities of galena ore have been found in
Woburn and that vicinity. There are some localities near
Newburyport where the savages may have found small
quantities of galena.

[395] Black leade is doubtless plumbago, or graphite; it is
found in Wrentham and in Worcester, Mass., as well as at
various points in Rhode Island.

[396] Red leade is doubtless an ochre, such as may have
been found near Cranston, R. I.

[397] Boll armoniack is the Bolus armeniaca of the old
apothecaries. Bolus is the prefix to several old
pharmacopial names, having lost its original special
signification and come to be a given term for all lumpy
substances. Here it means a sort of reddish clay, such as
may be used for marking,—a clayey ochre such as may
have come from about Providence, R. I.

[398] Vermilion oxide of mercury is not known to occur
this side of the Rocky Mountains. It is likely that he
mistook some brilliant ochre for true vermilion. It may be,
however, that the aborigines traded for it with western
tribes. Their copper implements probably came from Lake
Superior. Many evidences of almost as wide a commerce
could be adduced.

[399] Brimstone, or sulphur, does not exist in its metallic
state this side of the Cordilleras. He may have seen some
pyrite-bearing schists, such as occur in Maine, which in
dumping give a sulphuric smell.

Page 405

[400] Tin does not occur in this region. Some localities are
known in Maine and elsewhere in New England, but they
could hardly have been found by the Savages, or known to
Morton.

[401] Copper in its metallic state, the only form in which he
would have recognized it, does not occur about
Massachusetts Bay. A very little of it has been found in
Cumberland, R. I., in the valley of the Blackstone River.

[402] No silver, except when combined with lead and zinc
ore, has ever been found in this district. Some occurs in the
district from Woburn to Newburyport. Metallic silver could
not have been known to the natives. The nearest localities
for metallic gold are the streams of Vermont, New
Hampshire, and western Maine, in which district placer
gold occurs in considerable quantities, and some auriferous
quartz veins are known.
Professor Shaler adds to his foregoing notes: “The general
impression which I get from the writer is that he was a bad
observer, but not more untruthful than most of the
seventeenth century travellers. He does not say that gold or
silver had been seen by him, and limits his hearsay
evidence to a single mine. Except for the extraordinary stuff
about the whetstones,—wherein we may perhaps see
something of the Maypole humor,—it is, for its time, a
rather sober and reasonable story.”

[403] This is the name by which Morton invariably
designates John Endicott. For reasons which have been
explained in the preliminary matter to this edition of the
New Canaan (supra, pp. 38-42), its author felt—and, as
will be seen, never missed an opportunity to express—a
peculiar bitterness towards Endicott.

Page 406

[404] For the notes to this chapter I am indebted to
Theodore Lyman, of the Massachusetts Fish Commission.
Higginson, in his New England’s Plantation, has a passage
on Fish (Young’s Chron. of Mass., pp. 248-51), and
Williams, in his Key, devotes a chapter (xix.) to the same
subject. Wood again, in his Prospect (pp. 27-31), deals with
it in his peculiar manner, and Josselyn, both in his Voyages
(pp. 104-15) and in his Rarities (pp. 22-37), devotes a good
deal of space to the enumeration of the different kinds of
New England fishes, their peculiarities, and the methods of
taking them. In editing the Rarities, Mr. Tuckerman
remarked that he had “little to offer in elucidation of the list
[of fishes], which, indeed, in good part, appears sufficiently
intelligible,”—a remark equally applicable to the present
chapter of the New Canaan.

[405] Portland Harbor. See supra, 218, note 1.

[406] This proves that the local Cod, i. e., those that breed
close to the shore, have much decreased; and this partly by
over-fishing, and partly by the falling-off of their food in
the form of young fishes coming to the sea from rivers and
brooks.

[407] This is perhaps the first mention in America of cod-
liver oil, now so much used in medicine.

[408] The Striped Bass (Labrax). The Bass mentioned four
paragraphs below, as chasing mackerel “into the shallow
waters,” may perhaps be the Bluefish (Temnodon).

[409] This is either an expression which has wholly passed
out of use, or else a misprint. Probably the latter. It may,
however, also be surmised that Morton characteristically
coined a word from the Latin, and here meant to refer to the

Page 407

various large fish in New England waters, such as the
Horse Mackerel (Thynnus secundo dorsalis), the Mackerel
Shark (Lamna punctata), and the common Dogfish
(Acanthias Americanus), all of which follow schools of
mackerel, bass, &c., into shoal waters and prey upon them.

[410] “These Macrills are taken with drailes, which is a
long small line, with a lead and a hooke at the end of it,
being baited with a peece of a red cloath.” (New England’s
Prospect, p. 30.) This instrument still bears the same name
and is used in the same way.

[411] When caught in the Thames, within the jurisdiction of
the Lord Mayor of London, the Sturgeon (Acipenser) is a
royal fish reserved for the sovereign. “The Sturgeon is a
Regal fish too, I have seen of them that have been sixteen
foot in lenghth.” (Jossel., Two Voyages, p. 105.)

[412] But little attention has been paid as yet in the United
States to the Sturgeon fisheries, in spite of their great
abundance.

[413] [jieele.] See supra, 111, note 1.

[414] “There be a greate store of Salt water Eeles,
especially in such places where grasse growes: for to take
these there be certaine Eele pots made of Osyers, which
must be baited with a peece of Lobster, into which the
Eeles entering cannot returne backe againe; some take a
bushell in a night in this maner, eating as many as they
have neede of for the present, and salt up the rest against
Winter. These Eeles be not of so luscious a tast as they be
in England, neither are they so aguish, but are both
wholsom for the body, and delightfull for the taste.” (New
England’s Prospect, p. 30.)

Page 408

[415] Morton confounds the Shad (Alosa præstabilis), or
Allize (corruption of the French Alose), with the smaller
Alewife. This, with the Smelt and the Eel, are among the
few shore fishes that are still found in comparative plenty.
The Menhaden is used in our time to set corn.

[416] At the present time the Halibut (Hippoglossus) is
seldom caught near the shore or in shoal water. It is taken
by the Gloucester fishermen along the outer banks, in
depths of a hundred to two hundred fathoms. The New
England Turbot (Lophopsetta) of our coasts is a different
fish, and rarely ventures to the north of Cape Cod. The
fishermen frequently sell our turbot as chicken-halibut.

[417] The Flounder (Pseudopleuronectes), whereof there
are several species.

[418] Hake (Phycis) are still somewhat common.

[419] Morton probably means the Menhaden (Brevoortia).
The European Pilchard, the adult of the Sardine, is not
found on our coast.

[420] Probably the Double-crested Cormorant
(Phalacrocorax dilophus). The Common Cormorant (P.
carbo) also occurs in New England, but it is rare to the
southward of Maine. Both species breed abundantly on
rocky shores about the Gulf of St. Lawrence and northward,
visiting New England waters during the autumn and winter.
While with us they are exclusively maritime, frequenting
by choice the vicinity of outlying ledges and small, rocky
islands. When passing from place to place, they often fly in
large flocks, which are usually arranged in long lines or
single files. They live on fish, which they capture by
diving.

Page 409

[421] This paragraph, and the one on clams immediately
following it, throw considerable light on the formation of
the shell-heaps, a question which has been recently much
discussed. See the paper of Professor F. W. Putnam, read at
the meeting of the Maine Historical Society in Portland, in
December, 1882, which will appear in the report of the
proceedings of that meeting in the Collections of the
Society.

[422] We, in this country, have not retained the European
taste for mussels and for razor-shells (Solen).

[423] The eating of scallops (Pecten) has been revived
within a few years.

[424] A strong spirit of emulation existed in the early years
of the seventeenth century, between the advocates of New
England and those of Virginia, as sites for colonization.
Morton was always a stanch New Englander, and in this
chapter, as well as in those which immediately precede and
follow it, he loses no opportunity to assert the superiority of
the Massachusetts climate and products over those of the
country further south. It is needless to point out that his
advocacy led him into ludicrously wild statements.

[425] There is no natural spring of any kind at Mount
Wollaston, though water is easily obtained by digging.

[426] Winnisimmet, the Indian name of Chelsea. Upon the
significance of the name Mr. Trumbull writes: “I have my
doubts about Morton’s Weenasemute, but am inclined to
believe that his interpretation is founded on fact. Ashim (=
asim, in local dialect) is once used by Eliot (Cant. iv. 12)
for ‘fountain.’ It denotes a place from which water (for
drinking) is taken. Winn’ashim, or Winn’asim, means ‘the

Page 410

good fountain,’ or spring; and Winn’asim-ut (or et) is ‘at the
good spring.’ The efficacy of the water ‘to cure barrenness’
may have been Morton’s embellishment, but not
improbably was an Indian belief.”

[427] Squantum, in Quincy.

[428] This is a gross exaggeration. Thomas Wiggin, in
November, 1622, wrote: “For the plantation in
Mattachusetts, the English there being about 2000 people,
yonge and old.” (iii. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. viii. p. 322.)
Writing on May 22, 1634, about the time Morton referred
to (Supra, 78), Governor Winthrop says: “For the number
of our people, we never took any surveigh of them, nor doe
we intend it, except inforced throughe urgent occasion
(David’s example stickes somewhat with us) but I esteeme
them to be in all about 4000: soules and upwarde.” (Proc.
Mass. Hist. Soc., Dec. 14, 1882.) So in the New England’s
Prospect (p. 42), Wood speaks of the population of
Massachusetts as “foure thousand soules.” In the spring of
1634 there may have been five hundred persons in the
Plymouth colony, and as many more in New Hampshire
and Maine, making a total New England population of five
thousand at the time Morton was writing. When the New
Canaan was published, however, in 1637, the population
undoubtedly was as large as 12,000.

[429] Supra, 187, note 4.

[430] This astounding proposition was in the early days of
the settlement not peculiar to Morton. Higginson, in his
New Englands Plantation, speaks of the “extraordinary
clear and dry air, that is of a most healing nature to all such
as are of a cold, melancholy, phlegmatic, rheumatic temper
of body,” and concludes what he has to say on the subject
with his often-quoted sentiment that “a sup of New-

Page 411

England’s air is better than a whole draught of Old
England’s ale.” (Young’s Chron. of Mass., pp. 251-2.)
Williams, too, says in his Key (ch. xiii.): “The Nor-West
wind (which occasioneth New-England cold) comes over
the cold frozen Land, and over many millions of Loads of
Snow: and yet the pure wholesomnesse of the Aire is
wonderfull, and the warmth of the Sunne, such in the
sharpest weather, that I have often seen the Natives
Children runne about starke naked in the coldest dayes.”
Again, in the pamphlet entitled New England’s First Fruits,
printed in London in 1643, it was stated, in reply to the
objection of extreme winter cold, that “the cold there is no
impediment to health, but very wholsome for our bodies,
insomuch that all sorts generally, weake and strong, had
scarce ever such measure of health in all their lives as
there.... Men are seldome troubled in winter with coughes
and Rheumes.” (i. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. i. p. 249.)
Josselyn, however, writing nearly thirty years later,
remarks: “Some of our New-England writers affirm that the
English are never, or very rarely, heard to sneeze or cough,
as ordinarily they do in England, which is not true.” (Two
Voyages, p. 184.)

[431] Supra, 201, note 2.

[432] Supra, *17.

[433] Wood in his Prospect (p. 2), referring to the approach
to Boston Bay from Cape Anne, had said: “The surrounding
shore being high, and showing many white Cliffes, in a
most pleasant prospect.”

[434] The Second Book of the New Canaan, it would seem,
originally ended with this chapter. The next chapter was an
afterthought of the author, written before December, 1635,
as is evident from the allusions in it to events then taking

Page 412

place. (Supra, 78.) Wood’s Prospect was published in 1634,
and the constant references to it in the first two books of the
New Canaan show that they were both written subsequent
to its publication, probably during that year. In the Third
Book there are no allusions to the Prospect, and the
reference to the Third Book in the Second (Supra, *51), to
which attention has already been called, show that it must
have been written before the others, and probably during
the year 1633. It would seem to have been completed in
May, 1634. There is, however, also a reference to be found
in the Third Book to the Second (Infra, *120), but it was
probably interpolated during a revisal of the manuscript.

[435] Now Lake Champlain. “By the Indians north of the
St. Lawrence and the Lakes, it was called the Lake of the
Iroquois, as likewise the River Richelieu, connecting it and
the River St. Lawrence, they called the River of the
Iroquois. Champlain discovered the lake in 1609, and gave
it his own name. (Voyages, Prince Soc. ed., vol. ii. pp. 210-
20; Parkman’s Pioneers of France, p. 316.) On some of the
early maps it is put down ‘Lake Champlain or Irocoise.’ It
is so called in Purchas’s Pilgrims (vol. iv. p. 1643). The
region about the lake was sometimes called Irocosia. The
Iroquois lived on the south of the lake, and, as their
enemies on the north approached them through this lake,
they naturally called it the Lake of the Iroquois.” (MS.
letter of Rev. E. F. Slafter.)

[436] The measurement and distance here given are very
nearly correct. Lake Champlain is 126 miles long by about
14 in width at its broadest part. Burlington is not far from
240 miles from Boston.

[437] In regard to the imaginary attractions and advantages
of Laconia and its great lake, see Belknap’s American
Biography, vol. i. p. 377.

Page 413

[438] The two brothers, William and Emery de Caen,
became prominent in the history of Canadian settlement in
1621, and remained so for a number of years. They did not,
however, plant a colony of French in America, nor was the
name of Canada, or of its famous river, derived from their
name. On this point see Parkman’s Pioneers of France, pp.
184, note, and 391-5. Morton’s derivation of the name
Canada is entitled to much the same weight as his
derivation of the names Pantucket and Mattapan. (Supra,
124.) It was not, however, peculiar to him as, forty years
later, Josselyn also speaks (Rarities, p. 5) of “the River
Canada, (so called from Monsieur Cane).”

[439] On the breaking out of the war between England and
France in 1627, under the influence of Buckingham, Sir
William Alexander had been instrumental in organizing an
expedition to seize the French possessions in America. At
its head were three Huguenots of Dieppe,—David, Louis
and Thomas Kirk, brothers. The expedition was successful,
and on the 20th of July, 1629, Champlain surrendered
Quebec to Louis Kirk. Daniel Kirk, the admiral of the
expedition, returned to England in November of the same
year; but his brother Thomas remained in Canada and held
Quebec as an English conquest until July, 1632, when, in
accordance with the conditions of the peace of April 14,
1629, it was restored to France. See Kirke’s First English
Conquest of Canada, pp. 63-93; Parkman’s Pioneers of
France, pp. 401-11; also Mr. Deane’s note in Proc. Mass.
Hist. Soc. for 1875-6, pp. 376-7.

[440] The number of beaver-skins really carried to England
by Kirk was seven thousand. (Kirke’s First English
Conquest of Canada, p. 85.)

[441] It is unnecessary to say that Morton was here writing
at random. He confounds the Potomac with the Hudson,

Page 414

though, a few paragraphs further on (Infra, *99), he states
the facts in regard to the latter river correctly; and the
latitude he gives has no significance, being that of
Poughkeepsie, on the Hudson, and Cleveland, on Lake
Erie. The Potomac nowhere flows so far north as 40°. The
falls referred to are probably those of Niagara. They had
not then been discovered (Parkman’s Jesuits in North
America, p. 142), though vague reports concerning them
had reached the French through the Indians, and they are
plainly indicated on Champlain’s map of 1629. (Voyages,
Prince Soc. ed., vol. i. p. 271, note.) Some loose stories in
regard to the rivers, falls, lakes and islands of the interior
had been picked up by Morton, probably in his talks with
seamen and others who had taken part in Kirk’s expedition.
He certainly fell in with these in London, and it is more
than likely that at the house of Gorges he saw Champlain’s
map of 1629; though upon that the falls are placed at 43½
degrees of latitude, instead of at 41½. In 1634 there was no
other map. On the strength of the information thus
gathered, he made the statements contained in this chapter.
The little he knew had been obtained in England, after his
return there in 1631; for the Massachusetts Indians can
hardly have known much of the remote interior, and in
1630 no attempts even at exploration away from the
seashore had been made by the straggling occupants of the
New England coast.

[442] The stories here referred to probably came from the
Indians of Connecticut and Maine, and referred to the rivers
and lakes of New England, but were afterwards supposed to
have had a wider significance.

[443] Williams (Key, 64) gives Macháug as the Indian
word for No, but it really signifies no-thing (Key, 182).
Matta, as Morton gives it, is the simple negative.

Page 415

[444] Henry Josselyn was a brother of John Josselyn,
author of New Englands Rarities and the Two Voyages to
New England, frequently quoted in the notes to this edition
of the New Canaan. He came out from England in the
interest of Mason, as stated in the text, in 1634, and passed
the remainder of his life in Maine, living at Black Point in
the town of Scarborough. He died in 1683. He was deputy-
governor of the province, and one of the most active and
influential men in it, holding, through all changes of
proprietorship and government, the most important offices.
See Mr. Tuckerman’s Introduction to the New Englands
Rarities; Hist. of Cumberland County, Maine, p. 362.

[445] Of Captain John Mason of New Hampshire and the
Laconia enterprise, it is not necessary to speak at length in
this connection. Mason was the most prominent character
in the early history of New Hampshire, and the loss which
his death, in December 1635, entailed on the projects of
Gorges and Morton has already been referred to (Supra,
76). The late Charles W. Tuttle, of Boston was at the time
of his death engaged in preparing a life of Mason, which
would unquestionably have been a valuable addition to the
history of the settlement of New England. The material he
had collected is now in the possession of his family. In
regard to the Laconia Company and its projects, see
Belknap’s American Biography, under the title Gorges, and
Mr. Deane’s note in the Proc. Mass. Hist. Soc., 1875-6, pp.
376-80.

[446] Wood’s statement here referred to is found on the first
page of the Prospect, and is as follows: “The Place
whereon the English have built their Colonies, is judged by
those who have best skill in discovery, either to bee an
Island, surrounded on the North side with the spacious
River Cannada, and on the South with Hudsons River, or
else a Peninsula, these two Rivers overlapping one another,

Page 416

having their rise from the great Lakes which are not farre
off one another, as the Indians doe certainly informe us.”

[447] In 1631 no less than 15,174 skins, the greater portion
beaver, were exported from the New Netherlands, valued at
about £12,000. (O’Callaghan’s New Netherland, p. 139.)

[448] The Nipmucks, or Nipnets, inhabited the present
county of Worcester. (Hist. of Worcester County, vol. i. p.
8.)

[449] This is a confused, rambling account of the familiar
Indian incidents which took place during the first year after
the landing at Plymouth. There is nothing of historical
value in it, and nothing which has not been more accurately
and better told by Bradford, Winslow, Mourt and Smith.

[450] Captain Thomas Hunt, who commanded one of the
vessels of Smith’s squadron, in his voyage of 1614.
(Bradford, p. 95.)

[451] Morton, in this chapter, confounds Samoset with
Squanto. It was Squanto who was kidnapped by Hunt and
had been in England, but it was Samoset who walked into
the Plymouth settlement, on the 26th of March [n. s.], 1621,
and saluted the planters with “wellcome in the English
phrase.” Squanto was a native of Plymouth, but Samoset
belonged at Pemaquid, in Maine. (Mourt, Dexter’s ed., note
295, p. 83.) Hence Morton speaks of his having been
detained by Massasoit as a captive. He apparently came to
Massachusetts the year before on Captain Dermer’s vessel,
in company with Squanto. Dr. Dexter is seriously in error in
his account of Squanto in note 315 of his edition of Mourt.
Squanto could not have been one of the Weymouth captives
of 1605.

Page 417

[452] This is the familiar anecdote of Squanto. (Bradford,
p. 113; Young’s Chron. of Pilg., p. 292.)

[453] See supra, 133, note.

[454] The most connected account of Thomas Weston and
his abortive plantation at Wessagusset, already referred to
(Supra, 2), is that contained in Adams’s Address on the
250th Anniversary of the Settlement of Weymouth, pp. 5-22.
Winslow in Young’s Chron. of Pilg., Bradford, and
Phinehas Pratt (iv. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. iv.) are the
original authorities.

[455] This is a wholly confused and misleading account of
the skirmish which took place between the Plymouth party,
under command of Miles Standish, and the Massachusetts
Indians living near Wessagusset, immediately after the
killing of Pecksuot and Wituwamat, in March, 1623. The
correct account of the affair is in Young’s Chron. of Pilg., p.
341. Why Morton speaks of it as a battle between the
English and the French is inexplicable.

[456] See supra, pp. 11, 162, 170. The Plymouth people
may have despoiled the grave of Chickatawbut’s mother of
its bear-skins during some one of their earlier visits to
Boston Bay. Their last visit to those parts, prior to the
“battle” spoken of in this chapter, was in November, 1622
(Young’s Chron. of Pilg. p. 302), when they got little in the
way of supplies, and heard nothing but complaints from the
Indians of Weston’s people, who had then been several
months at Wessagusset. It is far more probable that these
latter stripped the grave at Passonagessit. In any event there
can be little doubt that Morton himself had visited the spot
while taking his “survey of the country” during the
previous summer (Supra, 6), and it is quite clear that the

Page 418

despoiling the grave had no connection with the subsequent
“battle,” in which Chickatawbut took no part.

[457] “Insomuch as our men could have but one certain
mark, and then but the arm and half face of a notable
villain, as he drew [his bow] at Captain Standish; who,
together with another both discharged at once at him, and
brake his arm.” (Young’s Chron. of Pilg., p. 341.)

[458] This is the famous Wessagusset hanging which Butler
introduced into his poem of Hudibras (Canto II. lines 409-
36), in the passage already referred to (Supra, 96). It is as
follows:—

Page 419

“Our Brethren of New-England use
Choice malefactors to excuse,
And hang the Guiltless in their stead,
Of whom the Churches have less need;
As lately ’t happen’d: In a town
There liv’d a Cobler, and but one,
That out of Doctrine could cut Use,
And mend men’s lives as well as shoes.
This precious Brother having slain,
In times of peace an Indian,
(Not out of malice, but mere zeal,
Because he was an Infidel),
The mighty Tottipottymoy
Sent to our Elders an envoy,
Complaining sorely of the breach
Of league held forth by Brother Patch,
Against the articles in force
Between both churches, his and ours,
For which he craved the Saints to render
Into his hands, or hang th’ offender;
But they maturely having weigh’d
They had no more but him o’ th’ trade,
(A man that served them in a double
Capacity, to teach and cobble),
Resolv’d to spare him; yet to do
The Indian Hoghan Moghan too
Impartial justice, in his stead did
Hang an old Weaver that was bed rid.”
That a man was hung at Wessagusset, in March 1623, for
stealing corn from the Indians, there can be no doubt. There
is equally little doubt that it was the real thief who was
hung. (Pratt’s Relation, iv. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. iv. p. 491;
Young’s Chron. of Pilg., p. 332; Bradford, p. 130.) I have
already (Supra, 96) given my own theory as to how the
incident came to take the shape it did in Butler’s poem. He
wrote, I think, from a vague recollection of an amusing

Page 420

traveller’s-story, which he had heard told somewhere years
before. There is no reason to suppose that he had ever seen
the New Canaan.
It has always been assumed that Butler’s version of the
affair,—the vicarious execution version,—coming out as it
did in 1664, at a period of violent reaction against
Puritanism, and when the New England colonies were in
extreme popular disfavor,—obtained a foothold in English
popular tradition; much such a foothold, in fact, as the
Connecticut Blue Laws. It was an intangible something,
always at hand to be cast as a mocking reproach in the face
of a sanctimonious community. As such it was sure to be
resented and disproved; but never by any disproof could it
be exorcised from the popular mind, or finally set at rest.
This may have been the case, and the references to the
matter in Hutchinson (vol. i. p. 6, note), in Hubbard (p. 77),
and in Grahame (Ed. 1845, vol. i. p. 202, note), certainly
look that way. I do not remember, however, to have myself
ever met this particular charge among the many and
singular charges, much more absurd, which English writers
have from time to time gravely advanced against America.
In Uring’s Voyages (p. 116-8) there is a singular account of
a similar vicarious execution, which never could have met
the eye of the author of Hudibras, inasmuch as it was not
published until 1726; but it shows that either some such
event did take place, or that its having taken place was at
one period a stock traveller’s-tale.

[459] Three of Weston’s company were among the
Massachusetts Indians at the time of the Wessagusset
killing; one of the three had before domesticated himself
with them; the other two, disregarding Standish’s orders,
had straggled off, the day before the massacre, to a
neighboring Indian village. After the massacre the savages
put all three to death by torture. (Pratt’s Narrative, iv. Mass.
Hist. Coll., vol. iv. p. 486; Young’s Chron. of Pilg., p. 344.)

Page 421

[460] Will Sommers was the famous jester and court fool of
Henry VIII. His witticisms are frequently met with in the
plays and annals of the period; and the portrait, said to be
by Holbein and of him, looking through a window and
tapping on the glass, was formerly a prominent feature in
the gallery at Hampton Court. It is very questionable,
however, whether the story alluded to in the text belongs to
Sommers. He had been dead eighty years or more when
Morton wrote, and the stories connected with him had been
gotten together by Armin, and printed in his Nest of
Ninnies, in 1608. This book Morton had probably seen. In it
there is a story of another famous fool, Jack Oates, of an
earlier period, which is probably the one Morton had in
mind. Oates is represented as giving an earl, the guest of his
patron, Sir William Hollis, “a sound box on the ear,” for
saluting Lady Hollis, and then excused himself on the
ground of “knowing not your eare from your hand, being so
like one another.” (Doran’s Court Fools, p. 182.)
Remembering this story in the Nest of Ninnies, Morton,
with his well-developed faculty for getting everything
wrong, seems to have fathered it on the most famous and
popular of the occupants of the Nest.

Page 422

[461] For the detailed account of the Wessagusset killing,
see Winslow’s Relation in Young’s Chron. of Pilg., pp. 336-
41; Adams’s 250th Anniversary of Weymouth, pp. 18-22.

[462] Mr. Trumbull, in a note (125) to Williams’s Key (p.
59). explains a blunder here made by Morton. The correct
word is wotawquenauge, which means “coat-men,” or men
wearing clothes, the waútacone-nûaog of Williams. This,
Morton confounded with another name for Englishmen,
chauquaqock, meaning, “knife- [i. e., sword-] men,” which
he understood to mean “cut-throats.”

[463] Weston, in 1622, got into serious trouble with the
English government, in regard to some ordnance and
military stores, which he had obtained a license to send to
New England, and had then sold to the French, with whom
the English were at war. (Bradford, p. 150.) He seems to
have been in hiding in consequence of this transaction; and
early in 1623 went on board of one of the fishing-vessels in
the disguise of a blacksmith, and came out in her to the
stations on the Maine coast. There he must have learned of
the extreme straits, if not of the abandonment, of his
plantation at Wessagusset, and he set out, with a companion
or two, in an open boat, for Massachusetts Bay. He was
wrecked near the mouth of the Merrimac, and barely
escaped with his life. The savages there stripped him to his
shirt, and in this plight he reached Thomson’s plantation at
Piscataqua. Thence he found his way to Plymouth, arriving
there, not as Morton says, “with supply and means to have
raised [his company’s] fortunes,” but in absolute
destitution. Bradford’s account of his reception and of what
ensued (pp. 133-4, 149-53) is very different from that given
in the text; and, it is hardly necessary to add, reads much
more like the truth.

Page 423

[464] Supra, 14.

[465] The incident here alluded to was the seizure of the
Swan, under a warrant issued by Captain Robert Gorges,
acting as Lieutenant of the Council for New England, in
November, 1623. The Swan was a small vessel of 30 tons
measurement, which Weston had sent out with his
expedition, in 1622. His plan was, when the larger vessel—
the Charity, in which his company went out—returned to
England, to have the Swan remain in New England, to be
used for trading purposes. Accordingly, all through the
winter of 1622-3, it had been at Wessagusset, except when
employed by the people there in obtaining supplies in
connection with the Plymouth people. When, in March,
1623, Wessagusset was abandoned, the company went in
the Swan to the Maine fishing-stations. Here Weston found
the vessel in the course of the following summer, and
recovered possession of her. He then began to trade along
the coast. Meanwhile, in September, Captain Robert Gorges
arrived, and immediately set out to look for Weston, in
order to call him to account for the ordnance transactions
referred to in the preceding note, and also for the disorderly
conduct of his people at Wessagusset during the previous
winter. Starting for the eastward, he was driven into
Plymouth Harbor by heavy weather, and while he was lying
there the Swan made its appearance with Weston on board.
Bradford’s account of what ensued, including the seizure of
the vessel, differs toto cœlo from that in the text. He says
that Captain Robert Gorges, acting as governor-general
under his commission from the Council for New England,
at once organized a sort of a court,—he, Bradford, acting as
an assistant in it,—and proceeded to arraign and try
Weston. As a result of the whole proceedings Gorges
threatened to send Weston under arrest back to England.
Through the intercession of Bradford, however, he was
mollified, and finally Weston was released on his own

Page 424

promise to appear when called for. Gorges then went to
Wessagusset, leaving Weston with the Swan at Plymouth.
After a time Gorges seems to have concluded that it would
be very convenient for him to have control of the Swan, at
any rate for that winter. Accordingly he sent a warrant to
Plymouth for its seizure and the arrest of Weston. Bradford,
not liking this proceeding, took some exception to the
warrant, and refused to allow it to be served. At the same
time it was intimated to Weston that he had better take
himself and his vessel off. This he would not do.
Apparently his crew was mutinous and unruly, their wages
being long in arrears, and the Swan destitute of supplies. He
seems to have looked upon arrest and seizure as the best
way out of his difficulties. Presently a new warrant came
from Gorges, and both vessel and prisoner were removed to
Wessagusset. This was in November. There they passed the
winter of 1623-4. Towards spring Gorges went in the Swan
to the eastward, Weston accompanying him, apparently as a
pilot. The tidings received there led the disappointed young
Lieutenant of the Council to decide on immediately
returning to England. Accordingly he came back to
Wessagusset, and thence went probably to the fishing-
stations, very possibly in the Swan. Before leaving he
effected some sort of a settlement with Weston,—Bradford
intimates much to the advantage of the latter,—who was
released from arrest, had his vessel restored to him, and
was compensated for whatever loss he had sustained.
Weston thereupon reappeared at Plymouth, and thence went
to Virginia. He seems to have traded along the coast for
some years, but finally drifted back to England, where in
1645 he died, at Bristol, of the plague. (Bradford, pp. 140-
53. Young’s Chron. of Pilg., pp. 296-8, 302.)

[466] This chapter relates to incidents of no apparent
consequence, and of which there is no other record. It is not
easy even to fix the time at which they occurred, and it
would seem as if Morton, in his rambling, incoherent way,

Page 425

had confused the events of one year with those of another.
The only time when “35 stout knaves” were landed, at all in
the way described, at Plymouth, was in July, 1622, when
the Charity brought in there Weston’s company. Yet Morton
speaks of there then being “three cows” at Plymouth, which
would indicate that Morton’s arrival, referred to in the text,
was not in July 1622, but at some time subsequent to the
spring of 1624, when Winslow brought over “three heifers
and a bull, the first beginning of any cattle of that kind in
the land.” (Bradford, p. 158.) Yet Weston, again, had no
“barque” at Plymouth after 1623. The chapter seems to
have been introduced simply for the purpose of working on
the church prejudices of Laud against the Puritans. (See
supra, 93-4.) There is in it a combination of “the booke of
common prayer” and “claret sparklinge neate,” which is
suggestive of the Book of Sports as well as of “the Word of
God.”

[467] Bradford, p. 158.

[468] Facilis descensus Averno. Æneid, vi. 127.

[469] A killock is a small anchor. The phrase in the text
means that the wind caused the boat to drag her anchor, and
she went ashore and was stove in.

[470] The episode of Lyford and Oldham, in the history of
the Plymouth plantation, is told in detail by Bradford. The
account in the text differs from Bradford’s account only in
that it is the other side of the story. (See Bradford, pp. 172-
88.)

[471] See infra, 324, note. Though Lyford frequently
exercised in the Plymouth church, as an elsewhere ordained
brother, he was never installed as its pastor. When admitted
to it, Bradford says he made “a large confession,” saying,

Page 426

among other things, “that he held not himself a minister till
he had a new calling.” (Bradford, pp. 181, 185, 188.)

[472] Supra, 24.

[473] This chapter and Chapter XIII. (pp. 273-6) relate to
the same matter. It is impossible to venture a surmise even
as to their meaning. It would seem clear that they have no
historical value, but relate rather to some humorous
incident—having the full seventeenth-century flavor of
coarseness—which occurred in the settlement of Boston
Bay. Apparently, judging by the expressions, “this goodly
creature of incontinency” (Infra, *129), “that had tried a
camp royal in other parts” (*121), some English prostitute
found her way out to Mount Wollaston, in company with
one of the adventurers there, and subsequently went on to
Virginia. She may have come with Wollaston, and been left
in Boston Bay when her companion went to Virginia, and
then followed him, giving birth to a child on the way. This
would explain the allusion to Phyllis and Demophoön
subsequently made (p. *129). It is, however, a mere
surmise on a subject not worth puzzling over.

[474] It does not need to be said that this is one of Morton’s
preposterous statements. As the settlement of Virginia dated
from 1607, the twenty-seven years he speaks of was
equivalent to saying, “up to the time at which he was
writing,” viz. 1634. Virginia was then not only a much
older settlement, but it had a population largely in excess of
that of New England.

[475] Supra, 229, note 3.

[476] This chapter and Chapter XII. are, historically
speaking, as inexplicable as Chapters IX. and XIII. There is

Page 427

nothing in any of the contemporaneous records to indicate
who is referred to under the pseudonym of Bubble.

[477] One of the smallest of the islands in Boston Bay, still
called by the same name. It lies off Mount Wollaston, and a
mile or so away, and between it and Pettuck’s Island. (See
Shurtleff’s Description of Boston, p. 360.)

[478] [view] See supra, 111, note 1.

[479] Nipnet, or Worcester County; see supra, 240, note.

[480] [present] See supra, 111, note 1.

[481] Squanto is apparently referred to here. (Supra, 244,
note 2.) There is no incident in Squanto’s life—of which
there is a quite detailed account to be gathered from the
early Plymouth records—which is suggestive of the events
described in the text.

[482] The first part of Don Quixote was published in 1605,
and the second part in 1615. It was first translated into
English by Thomas Skelton, in 1612-20.

[483] The reference here is to the story of Demophoön and
Phyllis, told by Ovid (Heroides, II.) Demophoön, son of
Theseus and Phædra, accompanied the Greeks to Troy; and
on his return, Phyllis, the daughter of the Thracian king
Sithon, fell in love with him, and he consented to marry
her. But before the nuptials were celebrated, he went to
Attica to settle his affairs at home, and as he tarried longer
than Phyllis had expected, she began to think that she was
forgotten, and put an end to her life. She was
metamorphosed into a tree. (See Smith’s Dictionary, title
Demophoön.)

Page 428

[484] Supra, 17-19.

[485] Supra, 14, note 4.

[486] John Scogan was the famous court buffoon, attached
to the household of Edward IV., whose head Justice
Shallow makes the youthful Falstaff break at the court gate
(Henry IV. Part II. act iii. sc. 2), though Falstaff is
represented as having died at least twenty years before
Scogan could have been born. In regard to him, see Doran’s
Court Fools, pp. 123-30. “Scogan’s choice,” in Morton’s
day, seems to have been a popular expression, signifying
that a choice of some sort is better than no power to choose
at all. It was derived probably from the story of Scogan,
that he was once ordered to be hanged, but allowed the
privilege of choosing the tree. He escaped the penalty by
being unable to find a tree to his liking. Morton uses the
expression again, see infra, *137. But the reference here is
as obscure as “the poem.”

[487] Infra, 348, note.

[488] Supra, 278, note 1.

[489] “Ye Roman Goddes Flora.” (Bradford, p. 237.)

[490] In regard to the arrest of Morton by Standish, in June,
1628, see supra, 27-9.

[491] See infra, 291, note.

[492] Morton here confounds his experience in Boston, two
years later, with that at Plymouth in 1628. In 1630 the
master of the Gift refused to carry him back to England.
(Supra, 44.) In the spring of 1628, however, no vessel

Page 429

seems to have arrived at Plymouth from England, as
Allerton then brought over an assortment of goods, and
came in a fishing-vessel by way of the Maine stations.
(Bradford, p. 232.) Allerton returned to London in the
course of the succeeding summer or autumn, but it is not
probable then any vessel left Plymouth in June, 1628,
bound for England. (Supra, 29.)

[493] It was not until towards the close of the summer of
the next year that Morton returned to Massachusetts in
company with Allerton. (Supra, 36-7.)

[494] Morton implies above that the “Poem” which follows
was written shortly after the events to which it relates
occurred, and before his return to New England in 1629. It
was then, it seems, “in use” in London. The name of Ben
Jonson appears in the margin of the original edition, as of
this reprint, and opposite the first two lines, as above.
Exactly what this signifies it is impossible now to say.
Some critics that I have consulted are inclined to think that
Jonson, who was then about fifty-five years old and at the
height of his fame, may have written all the verses. Others
suggest that Morton, by putting the name in the margin,
meant to imply that Jonson wrote them all, and that this
was another of the unscrupulous tricks of the author of the
New Canaan. Neither explanation commends itself to my
judgment. The first five verified lines are a paraphrase of
five lines at the beginning of one of Jonson’s productions,
for a poem it is not. In his published works (Gifford’s ed.
[1816], vol. viii. p. 241) they appear as follows:—
“I sing the brave adventure of two wights,
And pity ’tis, I cannot call them knights:
One was; and he for brawn and brain right able
To have been styled of king Arthur’s table.
The other was a squire, of fair degree.”

Page 430

With the last of the foregoing lines the paraphrase stops,
and the rest of the verses in the New Canaan are, it must in
justice be said, not only more cleanly, but in other respects
superior to those to be found in Jonson’s works. Indeed,
where the latter are not unintelligible, they are almost
unequalled for the nastiness in which the writer seems to
revel. Gifford not too strongly remarks of them, “I dislike
the subject.” Morton, it appears to me, abandoning, at the
sixth line, the paraphrase with which he began, went on
with a production of his own, but very properly put
Jonson’s name opposite the lines he borrowed from him.
The remainder is in his own style, and not inferior to the
mass of the contemporary verse. He himself explains it.
The “nine worthy wights” are Standish and his party, who
were sent to arrest him. The “prodigeous birth,” was the
establishment of the Mount Wollaston plantation. The
“seven heads” were the seven persons composing the
company at Mount Wollaston at the time of the arrest. The
“forked tail” was the Maypole, with its antlered top. The
fear that the Hydra of Ma-re Mount would devour “all their
best flocks” refers to the apprehended competition in the
fur trade. The “Soll in Cancer” indicates the season; the
“thundering Jove” the storm, in which Morton made his
escape from his captors at Wessagusset. The arrest at
Mount Wollaston is passed over very lightly. Then follows
the discussion among the magistrates at Plymouth, as to the
disposition to be made of the prisoner. Standish would
seem to be designated under the name of Minos. He
recommends death. Eacus is more difficult to identify. In
the preceding chapter (Supra, 288), Morton speaks of him
as being the one whose “voice was more allowed of then
both the others.” My supposition is that, by Eacus, Morton
meant Dr. Samuel Fuller, who then apparently (Bradford,
pp. 264, note, 306, note) stood, next to Standish, at the head
of the assistants. Morton says that he “confounded all the
arguments that Eacus could make;” and he afterwards, in
the New Canaan, refers to Fuller with peculiar bitterness.

Page 431

(Infra, 298.) “Sterne Radamant” is clearly Bradford, “the
cheif Elder.” The remainder of the poem calls for no
explanation; and the whole of it is much less unintelligible
than is usual with Morton.

[495] [what] See supra, 111, note 1.

[496] “Brave Christmas gambols” were, it may be
remarked, not greatly in vogue in the Plymouth of 1628.
(See Bradford, p. 112.)

[497] Supra, 163, note 1.

[498] The personage referred to, in this amusing but
extremely scurrilous chapter, is Dr. Samuel Fuller. There is
a notice of Dr. Fuller in Young’s Chron. of Pilg. (p. 222,
note), and in Eliot’s Biog. Dict. He was one of those who
came over in the Mayflower; but that he was born in the
County of Somerset, and bred a butcher, appears only from
the statement in the text. At Plymouth, besides being the
physician of the colony, he was a magistrate and a deacon
of the church. He died there, of an infectious fever, in 1633,
and his best possible epitaph is read in Bradford (p. 314):
“A man godly, and forward to do good, being much missed
after his death.”

[499] Infra, 345, note.

[500] Paul’s Walk, as the central nave of old St. Paul’s was
called, was in the reign of Charles I. much what a business
arcade is now. There is a vivid description of it, with
extracts from writers of the time, in W. H. Ainsworth’s
romance, Old St. Paul’s (B. ii. ch. 7). See also, Gardiner’s
Charles I. (vol. ii. p. 11).

Page 432

[501] The visit of Dr. Fuller to Salem, referred to in the
text, may have taken place in 1628. Though he was also
there in 1629; and again in 1630, when he likewise visited
Charlestown. (Young’s Chron. of Pilg., p. 222, note.)

[502] This description of the usual effect of sea-sickness I
take to be peculiar to Morton.

[503] Endicott’s first wife was Anna Gover, a cousin of
Governor Cradock. Little is known of her. She came to
New England with her husband, and died during the very
early days of the settlement, as she seems to have been in
failing health in September, 1628. Endicott was married to
his second wife August 18, 1630; on the 17th of the
following month he sat among the magistrates at Boston in
judgment upon the author of the New Canaan, who had
been “sent for” just five days after the marriage, which
seems to have taken place at Charlestown. (Winthrop, vol.
i. p. *30; Young’s Chron. of Mass., pp. 131, 292; Supra, 43-
4.)

[504] This was the case of Roger Clerk, of Wandsworth,
attached in the chamber of the Guildhall of London, before
the mayor and aldermen, on the 13th of May, 1382, on a
plea of deceit and falsehood as to Roger atte Hacche. The
record is to be found in Riley’s Memorials of London and
London Life (pp. 464-6), and is very curious as illustrating
English manners in the time of Richard II. Morton’s
reference would indicate that the case had then been handed
down as a tradition for two hundred and fifty years. It
seems that Clerk gave Hacche a bit of old parchment, rolled
up in “a piece of cloth of gold,” asserting that it was very
good for the ailments with which his wife was afflicted.
Upon being arraigned, Clerk contended that upon the
parchment was written “a good charm for fevers.” Upon
examination, no word of the alleged charm was found in

Page 433

the paper. The court then told the prisoner “that a straw
beneath his foot would be of just as much avail for fevers,
as this charm of his was; whereupon, he fully granted that it
would be so. And because that the same Roger Clerk was in
no way a literate man, and seeing that on the examinations
aforesaid, (as well as others afterwards made,) he was
found to be an infidel, and altogether ignorant of the art of
physic or of surgery; and to the end that the people might
not be deceived and aggrieved by such ignorant persons
etc.; it was adjudged that the same Roger Clerk should be
led through the middle of the City, with trumpets and pipes,
he riding on a horse without a saddle, the said parchment
and a whetstone, for his lies, being hung about his neck, an
urinal also being hung before him, and another urinal on his
back.”
The punishment of the “pillory and the whetstone,” as it
was called, was that ordinarily imposed on those telling
falsehoods. In another case in the same volume (p. 316) it is
thus given in detail: “The said John shall come out of
Newgate without hood or girdle, barefoot and unshod, with
a whetstone hung by a chain from his neck, and lying on his
breast, it being marked with the words,—‘A false liar;’ and
there shall be a pair of trumpets trumpeting before him on
his way to the pillory.”

[505] The person referred to in this chapter was probably
the Rev. Francis Bright, of whom very little is known. He
was one of the three ministers sent over by the
Massachusetts Company in 1629, Higginson and Skelton
being the other two. In June of that year, when Graves and
the Spragues were sent by Endicott to effect a settlement at
Charlestown, Bright accompanied them as “minister to the
Company’s servants.” (Young’s Chron. of Mass., pp. 316,
376.) As such, he was the Caiaphas, or high-priest, of that
region, and it naturally devolved on him to “exercise his
guifts on the Lords day at Weenasimute.” Morton further

Page 434

says that the person he refers to had been a silenced
minister in England. That Bright had been silenced is not
known, but both Skelton and Higginson had been
(Magnalia, B. i. ch. iv. § 4; Neal’s Hist. of Puritans, vol. ii.
p. 229); and, though Hubbard intimates that Bright was a
conformist (p. 113), yet, in the Company’s letter to
Endicott, the three ministers are stated to have “declared
themselves to us to be of one judgment, and to be fully
agreed on the manner how to exercise their ministry.”
(Young’s Chron. of Pilg., p. 160.) Winthrop, Morton adds,
“spied out Caiphas practise; and he must be packing.”
Bright returned to England shortly after Winthrop’s arrival.
Johnson says (Wonder-working Providence, p. 20) that he
“betooke him to the Seas againe,” when he saw that “all
sorts of stones would not fit in the building.”
Samuel Skelton is referred to by Morton a few pages
further on (Infra, 306) as “Pastor Master Eager,” which
name may be taken to imply “covetousness” in him. But,
though Skelton might be termed the “Caiphas” of the
country, he was not silenced by Winthrop. He can,
therefore, hardly be the person here aimed at.

[506] [courteousnesse] See supra, 111, n. 1.

[507] Supra, 229, note 3, and 300, note 1.

[508] Iosua Temperwell. Under this name Morton always
designates Governor John Winthrop.

[509] Caiaphas was the high-priest of the Jews; Jonas, or
Jonah, was the first Hebrew prophet sent to a heathen
nation. The propriety of these two Biblical allusions in this
connection is, therefore, apparent enough. The allusion to
Demas is more obscure, as he is only mentioned by Paul as
a fellow-disciple who had forsaken him, “having loved this

Page 435

present world, and is departed unto Thessalonica.” (II.
Timothy iv. 10.)

[510] Supra, *144, *151.

[511] Supra, 30.

[512] Supra, 35.

[513] Supra, 37.

[514] By this name Morton designates Matthew Cradock,
the first Governor of the Massachusetts Bay Company,
though he never came to America. Cradock was a wealthy
London merchant, and as such subscribed largely to the
funds of the company. In regard to him, see Dr. Young’s
note in Chron. of Mass. (p. 137).

[515] It is not clear who Morton may have intended to
designate by this name. John Washburne was the secretary
and “collector for the company” at the time Endicott was
sent over, but of him nothing is known. (Young’s Chron. of
Mass., p. 55.) It would seem more probable that Increase
Nowell was the person Morton had in mind. Nowell was
one of the original patentees, contributing money to
forward the purposes of the company, serving on
committees, &c. (Ib. p. 262.) He came to New England
with Winthrop, and was among the magistrates who were
present at the trial of Morton in September, 1630. (Records,
vol. i. pp. 73, 75.) He was the first ruling-elder of the
Charlestown church. He is described as having been “a
worthy pious man” (Eliot); and if he was the person
intended by Morton,—which is not at all clear,—the
propriety of calling him Ananias, if it rests on anything, is
not apparent from the record.

Page 436

[516] The “covered case,” in which Governor Winthrop is
supposed to have brought over the charter of 1629, is still
to be seen in the office of the Secretary of the
Commonwealth at the State House in Boston; and that in
which Endicott brought over the patent of 1628 was, it may
be inferred from the text, similar in appearance. It very
much resembles the case for “some instrument of musick,”
being a flat, narrow box, 2 feet 10 inches long, by 3½
inches wide and 3 inches deep. It has a species of circular
annex, so to speak, at its middle, intended to contain the
seal. This annex, like the box, is of wood, and is 7 by 8
inches in surface, and the same in depth as the main case,
of which it is a part. The whole is covered with stamped
leather, now brown and mouldered with age. There are,
however, some things about this case which suggest doubts
as to its having been made quite so early as the time of
Charles I.

[517] In regard to this meeting at Salem, and the action
taken at it, see supra, 38-40. No record or other mention of
it, except that contained in the text, has come down to us.

[518] See supra 300, note 1.

[519] This refers to the famous Salem ordination of Skelton
and Higginson, July 20 and August 6, 1629; in regard to
which see Palfrey, vol. i. pp. 295-6.

[520] Supra, 41-2.

[521] [converted] See supra 111, note 1.

[522] The arrival of Winthrop’s fleet in June, 1630, is here
referred to. It has already been stated that Iosua Temperwell
is intended for Governor Winthrop. It will be noticed that

Page 437

Morton, much as he disliked him, always refers to
Winthrop, if not with respect, yet with a certain restraint of
tone and insinuation which he did not show to others, such
as Endicott, Fuller and Standish.

[523] Supra, *156.

[524] Supra, 47. See, also, the petition of Winslow, while a
prisoner in the Fleet, to the Lords of the Council. (Proc. of
Mass. Hist. Soc. 1860-2, p. 133.)

[525] Supra, 43-5.

[526] T. W. Higginson, who in 1866 published a translation
of Epictetus, furnishes me the following note on this
allusion: “The phrase ‘bear and forbear’ has always been
received as the formula especially characteristic of
Epictetus. It is most explicitly preserved to us in the Noctes
Atticæ of Aulus Gellius (B. xvii. ch. xix. §§ 5-6). Gellius
says: ‘Verba duo dicebat: Ἀνέχου καὶ ἀπέχου,’ having
previously explained their meaning. There was in 1634 no
English translation of any portion of Epictetus containing
the phrase; nor was he an author then much read at the
English universities. Morton probably, therefore, got the
quotation from the Latin of Aulus Gellius; if, indeed, he did
not pick it up in listening to the talk of some more scholarly
man,—possibly Ben Jonson.”

[527] Ille hæc ludibria fortunæ, ne sua quidem putavit, quæ
nos appelamus etiam bona. (Paradoxa, I. 1.)

[528] I am unable to suggest any explanation of the
allusions contained in this chapter. There is no apparent
clew either to the “zealous Professor” whose conscience
did not permit him to cut tombstones, or to the “gentleman

Page 438

newly come into the land,” who “incurred the displeasure”
of Governor Winthrop and was degraded.

[529] “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or
any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is
in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.”

[530] “Antonomasia (Rhet.). The use of the name of some
office, dignity, profession, science or trade, instead of the
proper name of the person; as where his majesty is used for
a king, or his lordship for a nobleman, or when, instead of
Aristotle, we say the philosopher; or, conversely, the use of
a proper name instead of an appellative, as where a wise
man is called a Cato, or an eminent orator a Cicero, the
application being supported by a resemblance in character.”
(Webster.)

[531] The phrase “them that are without [the church]” calls
for no explanation. It was common in early New England,
and both Lyford and Bradford are found using it (Bradford,
pp. 184, 187) exactly as Morton uses it, who probably
picked it up at Plymouth.

[532] Innocence Fairecloath is the name under which
Morton alludes to Philip Ratcliff. This man was a servant or
agent of Governor Matthew Cradock. He got into trouble
with Endicott and the members of the Salem church, and,
according to Winthrop, “being convict, ore tenus, of most
foul, scandalous invectives against our churches and
government, was censured to be whipped, lose his ears, and
be banished the plantation, which was presently executed.”
(p. *56.) Another authority speaks of the offence as a “most
horible blasphemy.” (iii. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. viii. p. 323.)
In the Records of Massachusetts (p. 88), under date of June
14 (24 n. s.), 1631, the sentence read as follows: “It is
ordered, that Philip Ratcliffe shall be whipped, have his

Page 439

ears cut off, fined 40 l., and banished out of the limits of
this jurisdiction, for uttering malicious and scandalous
speeches against the government and the church of Salem,
&c., as appeareth by a particular thereof, proved upon
oath.” The severity of this sentence caused much scandal in
England after Ratcliff returned there, and in April of the
next year Edward Howes wrote out to John Winthrop, Jr.:
“I have heard diverse complaints against the severitie of
your Government especially Mr. Indicutts, and that he
shalbe sent for over, about cuttinge off the Lunatick mans
eares, and other grievances.” (iii. Mass. Hist. Coll., vol. ix.
p. 244.) In regard to Ratcliff’s subsequent connection with
the Gorges-Mason attacks on the company before the Privy
Council, see supra, 50-2, 62, and Proceedings of Mass.
Hist. Soc., vol. xx., January meeting, 1883.

[533] See supra 304, note 2.

[534] The first two deacons of the church at Charlestown
were Robert Hale and Ralph Monsall. The Charlestown
church, however, was not organized until November, 1632,
sixteen months after Ratcliff’s punishment. (Budington’s
First Church of Charlestown, pp. 31, 34.)
The Boston church in June, 1631, had but one deacon,
William Aspinwall (Ellis’s First Church of Boston, p. 328),
in regard to whom there is a detailed note in Savage’s
Winthrop (p. *32). He was the deacon of the Charlestown
church at the time Morton was arraigned and punished, and
it is possible that Morton refers to him as Shackles.
Aspinwall was a man of prominence in the settlement; but
it must be remembered that, thirteen years later, “two of our
ministers’ sons, being students in the college, robbed two
dwelling-houses in the night of some pounds. Being found
out, they were ordered by the gouvernours of the college to
be there whipped, which was performed by the president
himself—yet they were about 20 years of age.” (Winthrop,

Page 440

vol. ii. p. *166.) If the president of the college could
officiate at the whipping-post in 1644, in a case of what
Winthrop calls “burglary,” there seems no good reason why
the deacon of the church should not have officiated there in
1631 in a case which the same authority calls “foul,
scandalous invectives against our churches.”

[535] Supra, 319.

[536] The character of the New Canaan as a political
pamphlet of the time, intended to effect a given result in a
particular quarter, has already been referred to. (Supra, pp.
68-9.) In this respect the present chapter is the most
significant one in the book. It was intended to act on the
well-known prejudices of Archbishop Laud, the head and
controlling spirit of that Board of Lords Commissioners of
Foreign Plantations which then had supreme authority over
the colonies. To that Board Morton dedicated his book; and
at the time he was writing it the Lords Commissioners, and
especially the Archbishop, were taking active measures to
vacate the Massachusetts charter and to assume the direct
government of the colonies. It is its connection with these
facts which alone gives any great degree of historical value
to the present chapter. In itself it is not deserving of careful
annotation, as it contains nothing that is new, and the
ground is much better covered by Lechford in his Plaine
Dealing. Like Morton, Lechford was a lawyer; and, unlike
Morton, he was by nature a devout man. A member of the
Church of England he has given in his book a remarkably
vivid and fair-minded description of the practice of the
New England churches during the earliest days of the
settlement. Mr. Trumbull’s very learned and elaborate notes
to his edition of the Plaine Dealing, which is the edition
referred to in the notes to the present chapter, have cleared
up Lechford’s text wherever it is obscure; and they obviate
the necessity of any careful annotation of the present
chapter, except where it is desirable to call notice to the

Page 441

special bearing any particular assertion made may be
supposed to have had on Archbishop Laud’s idiosyncrasies.

[537] “Teaching in the church publicly,” was, it will be
remembered, one of the offences charged against Winslow
before the Lords Commissioners at the hearing of 1634, for
which, at Archbishop Laud’s “vehement importunity,” he
was committed to the Fleet. (Supra, 69; Proc. Mass. Hist.
Soc., 1860-2, p. 131.) On the real practice of the New
England churches in regard to the exercise of their gifts by
lay members, see Plaine Dealing, p. 42.

[538] “I suppose the first preacher that ever thus preached
with notes in our New-England was the Reverend
Warham.” (Magnalia, B. iii. part 2, ch. xviii.) In regard to
John Warham, first of Dorchester and subsequently of
Windsor, Connecticut, see Dr. Young’s note in Chron. of
Mass., p. 347.

[539] There probably never was any regularly chosen
deaconess in New England. The office was recognized as
having come down from the primitive churches (Dexter’s
Congregationalism, p. 69); and Robert Browne in his
definitions, in the Life and Manners of all true Christians,
says: “The widow is a person having office of God to pray
for the church, and to visit and minister to those which are
afflicted and distressed in the church; for the which she is
tried and received as meet.” (Bacon’s Genesis of the New
England Churches, p. 84.) Bradford in his Dialogue,
written in 1648, speaking of the Separatist church at
Amsterdam, says, that besides the pastor, teacher, elders
and deacons, there was “one ancient widow for a
deaconess, who did them service many years, though she
was sixty years of age when she was chosen. She honored
her place and was an ornament to the congregation. She
usually sat in a convenient place in the congregation, with a

Page 442

little birchen rod in her hand, and kept little children in
great awe from disturbing the congregation. She did
frequently visit the sick and weak, especially women, and,
as there was need, called out maids and young women to
watch and do them other helps as their necessity did
require; and if they were poor, she would gather relief for
them of those that were able, or acquaint the deacons; and
she was obeyed as a mother in Israel and an officer of
Christ.” (Young’s Chron. of Pilg., p. 455.) It would be
inferred from the passage quoted that there had in 1648
never been a deaconess in the Plymouth church, as in this
Dialogue the old men are supposed to be describing to the
young men events strange to the latter, as having occurred
long before. Lechford says, speaking of the Massachusetts
colony: “No church there has a Deaconesse, as far as I
know.” (Plaine Dealing, pp. 24, 40) “I have not met with an
instance of [the] actual institution [of the office of
deaconess] in New England.” (Palfrey, vol. ii. p. 37, note.)
It does not seem, however, to have been even theoretically
one of the functions of the deaconess “to use her gifts at
home,” as Morton says, “in an assembly of her sex, by way
of repetition, or exhortation.” This would rather have
pertained to the office of teacher. Meetings of females, such
as those described, were held in the parishes during the
early days, and played an important part in the Antinomian
controversy. The deaconess did not, however, officiate at
them. The character of these meetings appears in the
following passage at the trial of Mrs. Hutchinson:
“Court. ... What say you to your weekly public meetings?
Can you find a warrant for them?
Mrs. Hutchinson. I will show you how I took it up. There
were such meetings in use before I came; and because I
went to none of them, this was the special reason of my
taking up this course. We began it with but five or six, and,
though it grew to more in future time, yet, being tolerated at
the first, I knew not why it might not continue.

Page 443

Court. There were private meetings indeed, and are still in
many places, of some few neighbors; but not so public and
frequent as yours; and are of use for increase of love and
mutual edification. But yours are of another nature. If they
had been such as yours they had been evil, and therefore no
good warrant to justify yours. But answer by what authority
or rule you uphold them?
Mrs. H. By Titus ii. 3-5, where the elder women are to
teach the younger.
Court. So we allow you to do, as the Apostle there means,
privately and upon occasion. But that gives no warrant of
such set meetings for that purpose. And, besides, you take
upon you to teach many that are older than yourself.
Neither do you teach them that which the Apostle
commands, viz: to keep at home.
Mrs. H. Will you please to give me a rule against it, and I
will yield.
Court. You must have a rule for it, or else you cannot do it
in faith. Yet you have a plain rule against it,—‘I suffer not a
woman to teach.’ (I. Tim. ii. 12.)
Mrs. H. That is meant of teaching men.”
(Weld’s Short Story, pp. 34-5.) See also the version to the
same effect in Hutchinson’s Massachusetts, vol. ii. pp. 484-
7.

[540] Supra, 262, note 3, and 306, note 3. The effect such a
statement as that in the text would have upon Archbishop
Laud is apparent. The real practice of the early New
England churches in the matter of ordination can be found
in the Plaine Dealing, pp. 13, 16, 17.

[541] “There hath been some difference about jurisdictions,
or cognizance of causes: Some have held that, in causes
betweene brethren of the Church, the matter should be first

Page 444

told the Church, before they goe to the civill Magistrate,
because all causes in difference doe amount, one way or
other, to a matter of offence; and that all criminall matters
concerning Church members, should be first heard by the
Church. But these opinionists are held, by the wiser sort,
not to know the dangerous issues and consequences of such
tenets.” (Plaine Dealing, p. 34.)

[542] There was no minister at Plymouth in the spring of
1628, when Morton was there. William Brewster was the
ruling elder in the church and officiated in its pulpit, where,
from the beginning, he had “taught twice every sabbath,
and that both powerfully and profitably, to the great
contentment of the hearers, and their comfortable
edification.” (Young’s Chron. of Pilg., p. 467; Bradford, pp.
187-8.) In the summer of 1628, but after Morton had been
sent to England, Allerton brought over Mr. Rogers as a
preacher, who soon proved to be “crased in his braine”
(Bradford, p. 243), and the next season was sent home. In
the autumn, apparently, of 1629, and while Morton may
have been at Plymouth at Allerton’s house (Ib. p. 253),
before his final return to Mount Wollaston, the Rev. Ralfe
Smith, who had come over with Skelton and Higginson in
the previous June (Young’s Chron. of Mass., p. 151), was
found at Nantasket and brought down to Plymouth.
(Bradford, p. 263.) He was not, however, chosen into the
ministry there until a later time. (Ib.) It is unlikely that
Morton here refers to Plymouth personages. He was at
Salem in 1629 (Supra, 306), and in Boston, where as a
prisoner he was undoubtedly made regularly to attend
divine service, from early September to the end of
December, 1630. (Supra, 45; Young’s Chron. of Mass., p.
321.) At Salem he had come in contact with Skelton and
Higginson; and it has been seen (Supra, 300, note 1) that he
probably knew something of Francis Bright of
Charlestown. The only other ministers then in the colony

Page 445

were John Warham and John Maverick at Dorchester,
George Phillips at Watertown, and John Wilson at Boston.

[543] It is scarcely necessary to point out that the three
following pages are largely the fruit of Morton’s
imaginative powers, and were intended for the special
edification of Archbishop Laud. As Plymouth was much
less well supplied with preachers than the towns of the
Massachusetts colony, it is altogether probable—as Dr.
John Eliot surmised, in his review of the New Canaan, in
the Monthly Anthology for July, 1810—the allusions to the
church-practises in this chapter found their largest basis of
fact in incidents which Morton had been a witness of in the
Plymouth meeting-house. It is safe to add, however, that he
could have had no agreeable recollections of the meeting-
houses at Boston and Charlestown.

[544] Oliver Le Daim, barber of Louis XI., created by him
Comte de Meulan, and sent in 1477 on a confidential
mission to Mary of Burgundy at Ghent. The account of his
experiences is to be found in the Memoires de Commines,
L. v. ch. xiv.

[545] Supra, 302, note 1.

[546] I am indebted to Mr. Lindsay Swift, of the Boston
Public Library, for the following explanation of this, to me,
very perplexing allusion: “Nic, or, more correctly, nick,—
namely, ‘a raised or indented bottom in a beer-can, by
which the customers were cheated, the nick below and the
froth above filling up part of the measure.’ I take this
definition from Wright’s Dictionary of Obsolete and
Provincial English. That the expression was a common one
the following quotations prove:—

Page 446

‘We must be running up and downe
With cannes of beere (malt sod in fishes broth),
And those they say are fil’d with nick and froth.’

(Rowland’s Knave of Harts.)

‘From the nick and froth of a penny pot-house.’

(Fletcher.)

‘Our pots were full quarted,
We were not thus thwarted
With froth-canne and nick-pot,
And such nimble quick shot.’
(Spurious lines added to Rand’s 1624 edition of Skelton’s
Elynour Rummynge.) Most of this information I have taken
from Nares’s Glossary and Halliwell-Phillipp’s Dictionary
of Archaic and Provincial Words, second edition.”

[547] The reference here is apparently to the running
footmen much in use in the eighteenth century, and also,
judging by the text, as early as the reign of Charles I. Their
duty was to run before and alongside the cumbrous coaches
then in use, to notify innkeepers of the coming guests. They
carried long poles to assist them in clearing obstacles, and
to help pry the carriages out of the sloughs in which they
frequently got stuck. (Brewer’s Dict. of Phrase and Fable,
p. 773; Macaulay’s England, vol. i. pp. 374-8.)

[548] It was one of the doctrines of Pythagoras that the
souls of the dying passed into the air, and thence into the
living bodies of other men, taking controlling possession of
them. That the nimbleness of the father’s feet might thus
account for the volubility of the son’s tongue is, it is
needless to say, a purely Mortonian deduction.

Page 447

[549] “May 12. [1621] was the first marriage in this place,
which, according to the laudable custome of the Low-
Countries, in which they had lived, was thought most
requisite to be performed by the magistrate, as being a civill
thing, upon which many questions aboute inheritances doe
depende, with other things most proper to their cognizans,
and most consonante to the scripturs. Ruth 4. and no wher
found in the gospell to be layed on the ministers as a part of
their office.” (Bradford, p. 101.) The marriage here referred
to was that of Edward Winslow to Mrs. Susannah White. It
took place in May, Winslow’s wife having died seven
weeks before, and Mrs. White’s husband, William, twelve
weeks before. That he had married people was, it will be
remembered, the other of the two charges advanced against
Winslow himself, at the Privy Council hearing just referred
to. (Supra, 322, note 2.) The practice of civil marriage
already prevailed in the Massachusetts colony also, as, a
week before the arrest of Morton was ordered, Governor
Endicott, on August 18, 1630, was married, at Charlestown
apparently, “by the governour and Mr. Wilson.” (Winthrop,
vol. i. p. *30. See also Plaine Dealing, pp. 86-7.) There are
few more edifying examples of the casuistical skill of
Winthrop and his associates than is afforded by his method
of dealing with the question of civil marriages, as explained
in detail in his Journal (vol. i. p. *323). “In our church
discipline, and in matters of marriage, to make a law that
marriages should not be solemnized by ministers is
repugnant to the laws of England; but to bring it to a
custom by practice for the magistrates to perform it, is no
law made repugnant, etc.” The charter of 1629 empowered
the General Court of the colony “to make, ordeine, and
establishe all Manner of wholesome and reasonable Orders,
Lawes, Statutes, and Ordinances, Directions, and
Instructions, not contrary to the Lawes of theis our Realme
of England.” (Hazard, vol. i. p. 252.)

Page 448

[550] At the conference between the Bishops and the
Puritans, held in presence of James I. at Hampton Court in
January, 1603, one of the practices of the English Church
especially excepted to as a “relique of popery” by Dr. John
Reynolds, the spokesman of the Puritans, was the ring in
marriage. (Neal’s Hist. of Puritans, vol. ii. p. 42.) Among
the reasons urged against its use I have not elsewhere found
the “diabolical circle” argument. It seems rather to have
been associated in the Puritan mind with the Romish
traditions. (Jones’s Finger-Ring Lore, pp. 288-90.) This
count, in Morton’s indictment, was based on good grounds.
“In the Weddings of [early] New England the ring makes
none of the ceremonies.” (Mather’s Ratio Disciplinæ, p.
116.)

[551] This refers to churching practice of the English
Church. At the Hampton Court conference, referred to in
the preceding note, another of the “reliques of popery,”
specifically excepted to by Dr. Reynolds, was “the
churching of women by the name of purification.”

[552] This count in the indictment was well laid. The
children of the non-communicants in early New England
could not be baptized; though they might be if either one of
the parents was a member of the church. At a later period
this became one of the leading causes of political agitation
in the colony, and is referred to in the Dr. Robert Childs
petition of 1646. In 1670 from four fifths to five sixths of
the adult male inhabitants of Massachusetts were without
the franchise, as being non-communicants. (Lechford’s
Plaine Dealing, pp. 47, 48, 151; Mem. Hist. of Boston, vol.
i. p. 156; Palfrey, vol. ii. p. 8, vol. iii. p. 41.)

[553] Supra, 316, note 2.

Page 449

[554] This was the favorite epithet employed by the early
reformers in referring to the Mass. Calvin called it “an
execrable idol;” Hooper, “a wicked idol.” Bradford—not
Governor William, but John, the Smithfield martyr of
Queen Mary’s time—terms it an “abominable idol of
bread;” and again, “the horriblest and most detestable
device that ever the devil brought out by man.” Bland,
rector of Adishan, repeated the familiar figure, calling it a
“most blasphemous idol;” and Latimer improved upon this
by adding the words, “full of idolatry, blasphemy, sacrilege
against God and the dear sacrifice of His Christ.” (Blunt’s
Reformation of the Church of Eng., vol. ii. pp. 399-402.)
The derivation of the Book of Common Prayer, in many of
its parts, from the Missal was unmistakable; and naturally
the next race of religious reformers applied to the former
the same earnest epithets of theological dissent which had
before been applied to the latter. Accordingly, in Barrowe’s
Brief Discovery of the False Church, we find the Book of
Common Prayer referred to as “a detestable idol, ... old
rotten stuff ... abstracted out of the pope’s blasphemous
mass-book, ... an abominable and loathsome sacrifice in the
sight of God, even as a dead dog.” Barrowe was one of the
three Separatist martyrs, and as such held in deepest
veneration at Plymouth. (Young’s Chron. of Pilg., pp. 427-
34.) The Book of Common Prayer was therefore
undoubtedly looked upon and referred to at Plymouth as
Morton says. Indeed, the Lyford schism was in some degree
due to its use. (Bradford, p. 181.) That it was, in the early
days, also so looked upon and so referred to at Salem and at
Boston, is not clear. It is true that in 1629 it was again the
cause of the Browne dissension at Salem (Young’s Chron.
of Mass., p. 287), in consequence of which Skelton and
Higginson both declared openly “that they came away from
the Common Prayer and ceremonies, ... and therefore,
being in a place where they might have their liberty, they
neither could nor would use them, because they judged the

Page 450

imposition of these things to be sinful corruptions in the
worship of God.” (Morton’s Memorial, p. 147.) The
Puritans of Boston, however, were not Separatists, and it is
open to question whether they at first felt towards the
Common Prayer as the Plymouth people felt towards it, and
as Morton says. In 1640 Governor Winthrop, it is true,
noted it as a thing worthy of observation that his son
“having many books in a chamber where there was corn of
divers sorts, had among them one wherein the Greek
testament, the psalms and the common prayer were bound
together. He found the common prayer eaten with mice,
every leaf of it, and not any of the two other touched, nor
any other of his books, though they were above a
thousand.” (Winthrop, vol. ii. p. *20.) When Governor
Winthrop tried and sentenced Morton, however, he was
anxious to preserve his connection with the Church of
England, and it is very doubtful whether he then looked
upon its Book of Prayer as “an idol.” (Proc. Mass. Hist.
Soc., vol. xviii. p. 296.)
As one count in Morton’s indictment of the people of New
England, that in the text now under consideration was not
only sufficiently well founded, but it was peculiarly
calculated to excite Archbishop Laud’s anger. It is
unnecessary to say that he was the special champion of the
Church of England ritual. To enforce exact conformity to it
he regarded as his mission. When the ships loaded with
emigrants for New England were, in March, 1634, stopped
in the Thames by order of the Privy Council, they were not
allowed to proceed on their voyage until the masters bound
themselves to have the Book of Common Prayer used at
morning and evening service during the voyage. (Council
Register, Feb. 21, 28, 1634; Gardiner’s Charles I., vol. ii. p.
23.) This was Laud’s act, and it is more than probable that
he was as much influenced by Morton on that occasion as
he was subsequently in the matter of Winslow’s

Page 451

imprisonment for having performed the marriage ceremony.
(Supra, 69, 93.)

[555] “Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for
ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have
omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy,
and faith.” (Matt. xxiii. 23.)
“But woe unto you, Pharisees! for ye tithe mint and rue and
all manner of herbs, and pass over judgment and the love of
God.” (Luke xi. 42.)
The significance of the text referred to lay, of course, in
Morton’s mind, rather in its indirect than its direct
application,—more in its denunciatory than in its
contributory portions. The clergy in early Massachusetts
were supported by the voluntary contributions in Boston,
and by a regular town-tax levy outside of Boston. (Plaine
Dealing, pp. 48-50; Proc. Mass. Hist. Soc., 1860-2, p. 116.)

[556] Supra, Ch. XXV. pp. 316-20.

[557] “Wink, v. n. 1. to shut the eyes. obs.” (Worcester.)

[558] Edward Howes, in writing from London to John
Winthrop, Jr., in November, 1632, describes how, on going
home at noon one day, he met the master of a vessel which
had just arrived from New England, together with three
others who had come over with him. The master passing
into the house on some matter of business, Howes had a
talk with one of the other men, whom he describes as an
“egregious knave.” The report given by this man of the
Massachusetts community strikingly resembles that given
by Morton in this chapter. He would, writes Howes, “give
none of you a good word, but the governor [Winthrop]; he
was a good man and kept a good table, but all the rest were
Hereticks, and they would be more holy than all the world;

Page 452

they would be a peculiar people to God, but go to the Devil;
that one man with you being at confession, as he called it,
said he believed his father and mother and ancestors went
all to Hell; and that your preachers, in their public prayers,
pray for the governor before they pray for our king and
state; ... that you never use the Lord’s prayer; that your
ministers marry none; that fellows which keep hogs all the
week preach on the Sabbath; that every town in your
plantation is of a several religion; that you count all men in
England, yea all out of your church, in the state of
damnation. But I believe and know better things of you; but
here you may partly see how the Devil stirs up his
instruments.” (iv. Mass. Hist. Col., vol. vi. p. 485.)

[559] Mr. Swift (Supra, 328, note) suggests that Morton
here alludes to the scene in Ben Jonson’s Tale of a Tub (act
iv. sc. 1), where Justice Preamble says:
“And what say you now, neighbor Turfe?”
Turfe answers him:
“I put it
Even to your worship’s bitterment, hab, nab.”
Here the Countryman makes the remark, and not the
Justice; but a wholly correct allusion by Morton is not to be
looked for. (Supra, 123, note 2.) The meaning of hab, nab
is, of course, “hit or miss, at a venture, at random,” and is
probably derived from habbe, nabbe,—“to have or not to
have.” (See Nares’s Glossary.)

[560] Supra, 44-5.

[561] Supra, 319, note.

[562] By the General Court of May, 1644, it was ordered,
that “Nantascot shall be called Hull.” (Records, vol. ii. p.

Page 453

74.) Mr. Savage, in his notes to Winthrop (vol. ii. p. *175),
and Mr. Whitmore (Proc. Mass. Hist. Soc. 1871-3, p. 397),
think it was so called from Hull in Yorkshire. It would
appear from the text that it had been locally known by that
name among the “old planters” before the settlement of
Boston.

[563] Sir Christopher Gardiner suddenly appeared in
Massachusetts in May, 1630, and returned to England in
1632, arriving there in August. He is supposed to have
come out as an agent, or emissary, of Sir Ferdinando
Gorges. I had begun the preparation of a note on Sir
Christopher, and “how hee spedd amongst the Seperatists,”
for insertion at this point; but the subject developed on my
hands until it assumed the shape of a study by itself. It can
be found in the Proceedings of the Mass. Hist. Soc. for
January, 1883, vol. xx.

[564] Machiavelli died in 1527, and The Prince was
published in 1532. The reputation of the man and of the
book were as well established in Morton’s day as they are
now.
“Nick Machiavel had ne’er a trick,
(Tho’ he gave his name to our old Nick.)”

(Hudibras, p. iii. can. i. lines 1313-4.)
This derivation is not accepted by the authorities. See
Brewer’s Dict., p. 614.

[565] Supra, Ch. XXV. pp. 316-20.

[566] As Saint Michael is one of the Azores, it may have
been during this voyage that Morton visited the Isle of Sal
and the tropics, as mentioned in the first chapter of the New
Canaan. (Supra, 117.) If the voyage did last nine months, it

Page 454

Page 455

Transcriber's Note
The following apparent errors have been corrected:

p. 18 (note) "Strutt s" changed to "Strutt’s"
p. 23 (note) "Infra *149." changed to "Infra, *149."
p. 83 (note) "State Papers.," changed to "State Papers,"
p. 98 "repects" changed to "respects"
p. 102 (note) "humming-bird”" changed to "“humming-bird”"
p. 130 (note) "pp, 70" changed to "pp. 70"
p. 133 (note) "1869.," changed to "1869,"
p. 137 (note) "‘eat.”" changed to "‘eat.’”"
p. 140 (note) "lxxxix" changed to "lxxxix."
p. 147 (note) "Hemlock-Bark" changed to "Hemlock-Bark”"
p. 148 (note) "nanwetee’" changed to "nanwetee"
p. 152 (note) "lxxxiv-lxxxvii" changed to "lxxxiv.-lxxxvii."
p. 158 (note) "together”" changed to "together.”"
p. 185 (sidenote) "3. & 4" changed to "3. & 4."
p. 196 (note) "linarius" changed to "lanarius"
p. 213 (note) "Chingachgook" changed to "Chingachcook"
p. 217 (note) "he got" changed to "be got"
p. 218 (note) "vol," changed to "vol."
p. 226 (note) "Psendopleuronectes" changed to "Pseudopleuronectes"
p. 269 "the rest" changed to "the rest,"
p. 314 "handsomely" changed to "handsomely."
p. 326 (sidenote) "despised" changed to "despised."
p. 348 "cured" changed to "cured."
p. 355 "N. Y." changed to "N.Y."
p. 356 "N. Y." changed to "N.Y."
p. 356 "R. I." changed to "R.I."
p. 358 "N. Y." changed to "N.Y."
p. 359 "Prospect" changed to "Prospect."
p. 359 "Whitmore, A.M" changed to "Whitmore, A.M."
p. 363 "131, n.;" changed to "131, n.,"
p. 365 "Canonicus" changed to "Caunoŭnicus"
p. 366 "196, n.," changed to "196, n.;"
p. 369 "186," changed to "186."
p. 371 "Kantantowwit" changed to "Kantántowwit"
p. 371 "Kodliep Kēn" changed to "Kodtup Kēn"
p. 372 "description of, 200;" changed to "description of, 206;"
p. 374 "205, n." changed to "205, n.;"

Page 456

Inconsistent spelling, punctuation and typography have otherwise been left as printed.
The following possible errors have been left as printed:

p. 19 beasly
p. 123 originlly
p. 125 probality
p. 127 this Cost
p. 132 strenght
p. 144 lenght
p. 148 uncivilizied
p. 154 fuond
p. 164 giude
p. 210 oder glands
p. 219 Blacklead.
p. 223 (note) lenghth
p. 230 Mattachusetts
p. 231 ageed
p. 261 doubdt
p. 281 strenght
p. 287 worties
p. 365 Cithyrea
p. 365 fire-brand
p. 366 Colchos
p. 366 Powows
p. 366 luzerans
p. 367 Drails
p. 367 luzeran
p. 368 luzeran
p. 371 Lannerets
p. 371 Leadstones
p. 375 Newcomein
p. 376 Pawtucket
p. 376 Phlegethon
p. 376 Phœbus
p. 377 Rhadamanthus
p. 379 Chappel: chalkstones
p. 379 Stubbs
p. 380 Wampumpeack
p. 381 Auld

Page 457

*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE NEW
ENGLISH CANAAN OF THOMAS MORTON WITH INTRODUCTORY
MATTER AND NOTES ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
States without permission and without paying copyright royalties.
Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license,
apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic
works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and
trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not
be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of
the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the Project
Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for copies of this
eBook, complying with the trademark license is very easy. You may
use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative
works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg eBooks
may be modified and printed and given away—you may do practically
ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S.
copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license,
especially commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE

Page 458

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG™ LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or
any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
Gutenberg License available with this file or online at
www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing
Project Gutenberg electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg electronic
work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept
all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
all copies of Project Gutenberg electronic works in your possession. If
you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg
electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms of this
agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom
you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people
who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg electronic
works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the

Page 459

collection of Project Gutenberg electronic works. Nearly all the
individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the
United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in
the United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
that you will support the Project Gutenberg mission of promoting free
access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg works
in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project
Gutenberg name associated with the work. You can easily comply with
the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format
with its attached full Project Gutenberg License when you share it
without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
other Project Gutenberg work. The Foundation makes no
representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
access to, the full Project Gutenberg License must appear prominently
whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg work (any work on which
the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase
“Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed,
viewed, copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States
and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
under the terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License included with

Page 460

this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located
in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the
country where you are located before using this eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg electronic work is derived
from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a
notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright
holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the United
States without paying any fees or charges. If you are redistributing or
providing access to a work with the phrase “Project Gutenberg”
associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply either with
the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain
permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg
trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
will be linked to the Project Gutenberg License for all works posted
with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of
this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide
access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg work in a format
other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official

Page 461

version posted on the official Project Gutenberg website
(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of
obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain
Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the
full Project Gutenberg License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg electronic works provided
that:

• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from the
use of Project Gutenberg works calculated using the method you
already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the
owner of the Project Gutenberg trademark, but he has agreed to donate
royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days
following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to
prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly
marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information about
donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”

• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does
not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You
must require such a user to return or destroy all copies of the works
possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use of and all
access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.

• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
receipt of the work.

Page 462

• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free distribution
of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™
electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth
in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of the
Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in
Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend
considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and
proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the
Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may be
stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete,
inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES -
Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in
paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation,
the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party
distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this
agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and
expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO
REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH
OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE
FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY
DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT,
CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES

Page 463

EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you
discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it,
you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by
sending a written explanation to the person you received the work
from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must return
the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity that
provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a
replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work
electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to
give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu
of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a
refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If
any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law
of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the
Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the
Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any
volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution
of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability,
costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly
from any of the following which you do or cause to occur: (a)

Page 464

distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg work, (b) alteration,
modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg work,
and (c) any Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project
Gutenberg

Project Gutenberg is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg’s goals
and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg collection will remain freely
available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure and
permanent future for Project Gutenberg and future generations. To
learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and
the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the state
of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue
Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification number is
64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S.
federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 41 Watchung Plaza
#516, Montclair NJ 07042, USA, +1 (862) 621-9288. Email contact

Page 465

links and up to date contact information can be found at the
Foundation’s website and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small
donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax
exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United States.
Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a considerable
effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up with these
requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where we have
not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Page 466

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg
electronic works

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg
concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project
Gutenberg eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search facility:
www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg, including
how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.

Page 467

back

Page 468

PDF language

简体中文 https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=21a63101586298dbb9c9bb481a0ced6a&bl=zh Translating…
Español https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=21a63101586298dbb9c9bb481a0ced6a&bl=es Translating…
Français https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=21a63101586298dbb9c9bb481a0ced6a&bl=fr Translating…
Deutsch https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=21a63101586298dbb9c9bb481a0ced6a&bl=de Translating…
日本語 https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=21a63101586298dbb9c9bb481a0ced6a&bl=ja Translating…
한국어 https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=21a63101586298dbb9c9bb481a0ced6a&bl=ko Translating…
Português https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=21a63101586298dbb9c9bb481a0ced6a&bl=pt Translating…
Русский https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=21a63101586298dbb9c9bb481a0ced6a&bl=ru Translating…
العربية https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=21a63101586298dbb9c9bb481a0ced6a&bl=ar Translating…