The Divining Rod_ Virgula Divina_Baculus Divinatorius (Water-Witching) Charles Latimer 350 downloads.pdf

The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Divining Rod: Virgula
Divina—Baculus Divinatorius (Water-Witching)

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you
will have to check the laws of the country where you are located
before using this eBook.

Title: The Divining Rod: Virgula Divina—Baculus Divinatorius
(Water-Witching)

Author: Charles Latimer

Release date: February 26, 2014 [eBook #45020]
Most recently updated: October 24, 2024

Language: English

Other information and formats: www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/45020

Credits: Produced by Chris Curnow and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net

*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE DIVINING
ROD: VIRGULA DIVINA—BACULUS DIVINATORIUS (WATER-
WITCHING) ***

THE

DIVINING ROD:
VIRGULA DIVINA—BACULUS DIVINATORIUS

(WATER-WITCHING.)

By CHARLES LATIMER,
Civil Engineer.

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are
dreamt of in your philosophy."—Shakespeare.

CLEVELAND, O,
FAIRBANKS, BENEDICT & CO., PRINTERS,
1876.

Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1876, by
CHARLES LATIMER,
In the Office of the Librarian of Congress at Washington.

AN ESSAY READ BEFORE THE
CIVIL ENGINEERS' CLUB OF THE NORTHWEST,
AT CHICAGO, FEB. 1, 1875.

PREFACE.

My Essay on the "Divining Rod," (vulgus, "Water-Witching,") having
proved interesting to a number of my friends, I have concluded to give it to
the public, with the hope that some useful practical results may be derived
from it. I have no apology to make for presenting this subject in a serious
light. I regard it as one strictly in the domain of science, and, therefore,
worthy of the consideration of scientific men. I have no fear of ridicule,
knowing for myself and "not for another," that what is here presented is the
truth.

To those who seek absolute truth, I need not recommend a reading of these
pages. To those who merely live by science, drawing their sustenance from
it as from the "convenient cow," as Goethe says, I will simply say, imprison
yourselves, gentlemen, in your shell; the world will move quite as well
without you.

I add a number of notes from various sources to which I had not access
before writing my own experience.

ABOUT "WATER-WITCHING."

( W H AT I K N O W. )

I have always observed that when any novelty is presented for the
consideration of man, which is not readily proven by already well known
scientific laws, or which may not be demonstrated by the knowledge and
power of most persons, it is found extremely difficult, if not impossible, to
gain the attention of the devotee of science. Whether, indeed, it be from
lack of interest, from incredulity, or from the fear of ridicule, or from any
other cause, we look with distrust upon anything which is not in harmony
with our preconceived ideas or theories, and we are apt to raise the cry of
humbug or superstition, and reject, with a contemptuous assumption of
superiority as unbelievers, propositions which properly put to the test might
prove of value to mankind.

Happily for us a wise Providence has not ordained that all minds shall
plough in a single furrow of the great field of knowledge. Some, therefore,
believe nothing but what they see, and frequently doubt the evidence of
their own senses. Others believe everything they see and nearly everything
they hear, and seize with too great credulity upon every new thing presented
to them. There are others who disbelieve nothing that is presented to them,
however apocryphal, without full and impartial investigation, aided not by
testimony alone, but by actual demonstration. Again, there are men who are
afraid to investigate, lest the world should call them visionary; these are
always prepared to apologize for examining anything outside the mere
routine of their special science. But the most frequent error of mankind is to
doubt and ridicule, without investigation, everything which is not
commonly received. To such I would cite the pungent words of Solomon:
"He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is a folly and a shame
unto him."

I feel that I am speaking to those, who always listen with interest to every
proposition, and are willing to examine it, until its demonstration is clear
and its hidden mysteries revealed, and never pronounce anything a
superstition or an imposture, until from patient research they have a right,
through their own experimental knowledge, to utter a verdict. But, lest there
should be among us one of these doubting Thomases or disbelieving cynics,
I would appeal to him with the history of the two Spanish students. These
two young gentlemen, while traveling from Peñaflor to Salamanca, stopped
at a spring to quench their thirst, and whilst seated upon the ground near the
fountain observed something like a tombstone, level with the water;
engraven on the stone were these words: "Here lies interred the soul of
Pedro Garcia." The youngest of the students, a thoughtless fellow, said,
laughing loudly: "What a joke. Here lies interred the soul! Who ever heard
of a soul being buried? who can tell me the author of so ridiculous an
epitaph?" The other, a reflective, judicious youth, said to himself: "There is
some mystery here, and I intend to solve it before I leave this spot." Letting
his companion depart, without losing a moment's time he took out his knife,
cut around the stone, dug under it a little, and there found buried a purse
containing one hundred ducats, with these words in Latin inscribed upon it:
"I declare thee my heir, whomsoe'er thou art, who hast had the genius to
understand the meaning of the inscription; but I charge thee to use this
money better than I used it."

Now to the point. The subject to which I am about to call your attention—
that of finding water by means of the "divining rod"—is one of those which
in modern times is classed among mere superstitions, and as such unworthy
of serious consideration by sensible people. I think I have it in my power to
demonstrate to you, principally from my own personal experiences—the
relation of which I beg you to accept as strictly accurate—that this is an
error on the part of the over-wise skeptics of our progressive epoch.

Worcester's dictionary gives the following definition of the "divining rod:—
A forked branch, usually of hazel, said to be useful to discern mines and
water." "Witch-hazel—a tall shrub of eastern North America, remarkable
for blossoming late in the autumn."

Another authority gives the following: "Divining rod—A hazel twig cut in
the form of a Y, by the aid of which certain persons (meaning, of course,
sorcerers like myself,) called 'dowsers,' pretend to be able to discover water
or mineral veins. The rod is held in a peculiar manner, and the 'dowsers'
walk backward and forward over the ground to be tried. As soon as he
crosses or approaches a metallic vein or aqueous spring the twig turns
toward it with a slow, rotary motion. This superstition has not yet died out,
and 'dowsers' are yet common in remote parts of England, France and
Germany."

Now, one can easily see that this writer is one of those who apologize for
seeming to believe a thing of the kind by calling it "a superstition not yet
died out."

Here is another definition: "Divining rod—A forked branch, usually of
hazel, by which it has been pretended that minerals and water may be
discovered in the earth. The rod, if slowly carried along in suspension,
dipping and pointing downwards, it is affirmed when brought over the spot,
where the concealed mine or spring is situated."

The form, the material and the mode of using the divining rod of the
modern miners and water finders seem to be superstitions of comparative
recent introduction. Many persons with some pretensions to science have
been believers in the powers ascribed to the "divining rod."

Here we have another case of the apologetic historian. He dared not say that
he believed it, even though he had seen it. Why? Simply because there was
no scientific fact or theory upon which he could base his belief—so he was
afraid even to say what he believed, lest people who read his encyclopedia
might say he was visionary.

I read somewhere, a long time ago, that this superstition was also rife in the
eleventh century. Now, like the young students above cited, some one
among you may exclaim, "Who will inform me who can be the author of
this ridiculous superstition?" I wish I could tell you; I am sorry I can not,
but I should not wonder if he lived before the days of Moses, the first

"dowser" on record. When oil was discovered in this country many of us
believed that there was at last "something new under the sun.' We have only
to turn to the Scriptures to learn that Job was in the oil and dairy business a
few thousand years before Oil City sprung up under our wondering eyes.
Job has always been supposed to refer to some great miracle when he says,
in the 29th chapter of his book, "I washed my steps with butter and the rock
poured me out rivers of oil; the young men saw me and hid themselves."
Also, in Deuteronomy, we read, chapter 32, verse 13, "And he made him to
suck honey out of the rock, and oil out of the flinty rock." Now, we have
these marvels repeating themselves daily; and I think it no very far-fetched
idea to assume that the "divining rod" was used in the discovery of these
precious deposits. I am myself acquainted with a gentleman who has lately
successfully located two oil wells by this magic (so-called) process.

In fact, who knows but that the first knowledge of the "divining rod" was a
revelation, and that Moses not only understood the art, but taught it to the
Children of Israel, from whence the supposed superstition has spread.

When Moses found the water at Meribeh-Rephidim and Meribeh-Kadesh,
in the wilderness of Zin, he had received the Almighty's command: "Go
before the people and take with thee the elders of Israel, and thy rod
wherewith thou smotest the river; take it in thine hand and go. Behold, I
will stand before thee upon the rock in Horeb, and thou shalt smite the rock,
and then shall come water out of it, that the people may drink; and Moses
did so in the sight of the elders of Israel."

In the 20th chapter of Numbers we read of a similar miracle occurring three
years afterward—"And Moses took the rod from before the Lord as he
commanded him, and said, Hear, now, ye rebels, must we fetch water out of
this rock. And Moses lifted up his hand and with his rod smote the rock
twice, and the water came out abundantly and the congregation drank and
their beasts also."

Now in the 21st chapter of Numbers we find these verses: "And from
thence they went to Beer, that is, the well whereof the Lord spake unto
Moses. Gather the people together and I will give them water. Then sang

Israel this song—Spring up, O, well! sing ye unto it. The princes digged the
well, the nobles of the people digged it, by the direction of the lawgiver,
with their staves." This shows that the lawgiver pointed out the places for
them to dig, and the people made the wells.

There is nothing like faithful searching if you wish to find; so I advise you
to look back also as far as Confucius, and then come down to the old monk,
Roger Bacon, and it would not surprise me if you should ascertain that
those old wise-heads had gone even farther than your humble servant into
the mysteries of the divining rod.

But I will not quote from these ancients; I will only look back a short
hundred years. In Sir David Brewster's Philosophy you will find that he
says that there is no doubt that the presence of water can be detected by the
divining rod, although it can not be demonstrated by any known science. It
was this last paragraph which I stumbled upon many years ago, that first
brought me to a practical knowledge of this phenomenon. I read it, and
being on a visit in Raymond, Miss., I went to Judge ——, of that place, a
scholar and a man of good sense, whom I took for granted had not failed to
gather in, among his great stores of learning, something about the topic
which had struck me so forcibly. I was not mistaken; the old gentleman told
me that he had not only heard a good deal about this matter, but possessed,
himself, the power of finding water, offering to show me how he proceeded.
Soon after we went, accompanied by my brother, Dr. L., to a spot where
there was a well known under-ground stream. The Judge cut three forked
branches from a peach tree, each took one and we marched over the spot
indicated, holding our rods according to the approved style of the "dowser"
proper. At a certain point the switches in the hands of the Judge and myself
went down simultaneously; the effect was very apparent; but my brother, in
whose hands there was no movement, mercilessly ridiculed the whole
proceeding; neither the Judge nor I being at all disconcerted by his skeptical
derision of our scientific research. I could not be shaken from faith in my
actual, absolute experience, and was fully convinced that there was a
mysterious power, beyond my ken, that turned the switch. I pondered over

the matter, and resolved that at some future day I would examine more
closely into it.

This, to me, decisive epoch finally came after a great number of trials,
always with satisfactory results as to the bare fact that water could be traced
or discovered. That the switch did turn in my hand readily was undoubtedly
true—the agency which moved it was the mystery.

I knew that electricity had broad shoulders, and had always carried the
weight of every unexplained phenomenon. I said this switch turns by
electric force. Having evolved my theory, I set out to sustain it, by
experiment. Upon inquiry, I found that not only could water be discovered,
but it was asserted that minerals as readily answered to the call of the magic
rod; and, indeed, that even their depth beneath the earth's surface might be
computed.

Granting this to be true, I concluded that I had not only a philosophical but
a mathematical problem to solve. I, however, never met any one having any
information on this latter point, nor in my readings did I find any allusion to
the possibility of ascertaining the depth below the surface of any concealed
stream or mineral. On the contrary, I found the general impression to be that
the whole thing was a superstition of ignorant minds. The doubters
frequently met me, and with some show of reason, with this personal
argument: "I cannot believe this thing, because the switch does not turn in
my hand." It is quite true that every hand does not have the power of giving
the motion to the switch; but this does not disprove the fact of its turning. I
have heard that the evidence of one man who heard a bell is worth that of a
dozen who did not hear it. The testimony is, therefore, to my mind, clearly
in favor of the "dowsers." All men are not the same conductors of
electricity. I have known persons who could light the gas by running across
the floor, rubbing their feet upon the carpet, and pointing a finger at the jet.
I never saw this done, but I have no doubt that there are many who can do
it, and also many who cannot.

Now, although the switch may not turn in the hands of all, this is no proof
that the current producing the movement does not pass through the persons

just the same—the effect is only less perceptible in some, than in others.

I had made a very large number of experiments, from time to time, before I
had an opportunity to make one which satisfied me that I was on the right
track. I had in these experiments exploded the superstition of the "witch-
hazel," and learned that peach, apple, willow, dog-wood, beech, maple,
iron, steel, copper—in fact, that even an old barrel hoop possessed all of its
virtues, and so concluded that after all this relic of the necromancer's art of
former days was a very simple matter, if we could but find the clue to it. A
few years ago it happened that I wanted to get water at a place called
Coloma, upon the Chicago, Michigan & Lake Shore Railroad, of which I
was then chief engineer. I concluded to test my electric theory here. I found
that it was necessary to dig a well upon the depot grounds—the point was to
see if I could find water where I needed a tank. I took a switch and found
water near the desired spot; then, with my theory in view, I made a second
experiment. I bought four ink bottles, adjusted them to a pair of wooden
sandals, which I fastened to my feet. Thus insulated, I walked over the
ground, my switch in hand, but, as I had anticipated, there was no
movement—the diviner's rod was powerless. I therefore assume that I am
right in ascribing the phenomenon to electricity. I continued my
experiments, having yet the mathematical point unsettled. Upon walking
over the ground again and again, I found that the switch commenced always
to turn at the same places, equally (or nearly) distant from a centre, and kept
gradually turning until it pointed directly downward. To assure myself, I
repeated this experiment many times, and arrived at the conclusion that the
switch commenced to turn at an angle of forty-five degrees from the edge of
the water, and that the distance from my hand to the water would be
measured by the distance from the point where the switch commenced to
turn to the point of absolute turn-down, and so it seems to be. The following
diagram will show more clearly my meaning:

A B, B A is the surface of the earth; W, a stream or pool of water below the
surface. Walking along toward A B the switch begins to move at A, and
turns down at B; the angles B A C and B C A being equal, the distance from
A to B is equal to B C. Measure the distance, therefore, from the point of
commencement of turning to the point of turn-down, and you have the
depth from your hand to the water. I have verified this over many water-
courses, upon bridges, etc., and I am satisfied it is correct, at least for the
latitude in which my experiments were made. Upon this basis I made my
first estimate of the depth of the water at Coloma, and gave it as from
twenty-five to thirty feet. I employed an experienced well borer and had a
two and one-half inch pipe driven into the ground at the exact point my
switch indicated, and found water at twenty-seven feet exactly. I had the
pipe driven down forty feet, and found that I had thirteen feet of water in it.
I then had a windmill erected and a large tank. Up to the time of my leaving
the road, the engines were supplied with the water, which, besides, proved
to be of excellent quality for drinking.

My well borer, who was a doubting Thomas, said he believed that he could
get water at the same depth anywhere. Fortunately for my theory, a
neighboring store-keeper tried the doubter and failed to get water under
fifty-nine feet.

Subsequent to the satisfactory experiment at Coloma it happened that on
one occasion, when I was traveling west on the Hannibal & St. Joseph
Railroad, that I was introduced to a gentleman engaged in building a road,
who related to me that during its construction the engineers had made use of
drive wells as they moved rapidly along. As the water question was always

one of interest to me, our conversation drifted, naturally, to "water-
witching." The gentleman said that all of his knowledge on this subject had
been obtained from his brother—a young man employed by Horace Greeley
on his farm at Chappaqua. Mr. Greeley had sent for him from hearing of
him as extremely intelligent and thrifty as a farm hand. It happened while
the young man was at Chappaqua that a well was needed, and the question
of "water-witching" came up. The young man said that his belief was, that if
one man could find water, so could another—whereupon he took a forked
switch and, walking about, found that the magic wand turned down over a
rock. He had a blast of powder put in at the point, the smoke of which
hardly cleared away, revealed a spring of water. Here is simply a repetition
of the smiting of the rock. In my own experience I have a similar instance: I
was assistant superintendent at Highlands, on the Vandalia line. Mr. ——,
then chief engineer, had, previous to my arrival, caused a well of ten feet
diameter and forty feet depth to be dug and walled up with brick, but the
supply of water was so small that it could be pumped out in a few minutes.
A hole had then been drilled sixteen feet to the rock, which was
conglomerate, of very great hardness, with no better results. The well was
therefore abandoned. If I had seen Mr. ——, I should have advised
penetrating the rock, but I did not meet him, and did not wish to interfere
with the work.

Mr. Koepfle, the owner of the land upon which the well was located,
arrived just at that time from Switzerland, and I soon became acquainted
with him. He came into my office one day and said: "Mr. Latimer, do you
not think there is water under that ground?" I replied, "Yes, I thought so."
"Did you ever hear of 'water-witching?'" he then asked. I said "Yes." "Can
you tell where water is?" Upon my affirmative answer he requested me to
go down and try a switch. I did so and found that it turned down in a
number of places about the well. Mr. Koepfle came to me again to say that
there was a "dowser" in the neighborhood and to ask me what I thought of
his employing him. I advised him to try the skill of this man by all means. I
was not present at the trial, but a short time afterward Mr. K. came to me in
great excitement to tell me that the man said there was a subterranean lake

at that very point. Among other things, he told me that the wand in this case
was a bit of whalebone—an item I treasured for future consideration. Mr.
—— had already commenced another well in a marsh about half a mile
west of the first. Mr. Koepfle asked my advice as to what he should do. I
replied, "I cannot take any action in the matter officially, but if you will take
it upon yourself to bore through that rock and pay the expense of it, I think
that no objection can be made to it, and I believe that you will get plenty of
water—in which case, I am sure you will not lose your money." "But where
can I get a man?" urged Mr. Koepfle. "Try Mr. ——'s man. I think Mr. ——
will be glad to get rid of the expense," I said. Mr. K. came soon after with
the man and agreed, by my advice, to give him $7.50 per day for his own
work and that of his man with the drills. In five days the rock was smitten
through with a three-inch drill, and the water immediately rushed up to a
point above the natural surface of the ground, only held by the railroad bank
—which surrounded the well—and there remained. I am not aware that Mr.
—— ever knew that his excellent well water was provided for him by the
magic power of a morsel of whalebone and a peach twig.

Upon one occasion, at a farm of one of my connections, the water gave out
in the well, (seventeen feet deep,) which had for years supplied a large
number of cattle. In the first place I ordered the well to be cleaned out, for it
was very dirty; but there was no improvement. It was then decided to dig
another. I found a place about ten feet north of the old well, where I judged
there was a small stream, and repeatedly estimated the depth to it by my
rule, and came to the conclusion that it was between ten and twelve feet. I
was rather astonished at this, for the water, it may be observed, was
seventeen feet deep in the old well. However the well was begun. I asked
the digger at what depth water ought to be found; he said at seventeen feet;
but I made this a test case, and said, "You will find water here between ten
and twelve feet, but if I should have to say precisely, I should say at ten
feet." Water was found at exactly ten feet, and stood at that point after the
well was finished.

A peculiar test occurred at Toulon, Illinois. I was talking on the subject with
a friend, a lawyer of that place, one dark night at about nine o'clock. He

asked, "Can you tell how deep it is to the water in the well in this hotel
yard?" I answered at once, "Yes," but said, "it is rather dark, and I know
nothing about the yard or the position of the well." However I went out and
started at the kitchen door, only asking upon which side of the house I
should seek. I traced the stream from the kitchen door, passing back and
forth rapidly until I found the well about forty feet from the kitchen and
near the barn. When I came to the well I said, "This stream passes five feet
from the well and does not go directly into it." I then made some
examination with the rod, and pronounced the depth to the water to be
fourteen feet, which was found by measurement to be correct. I will add,
that I was never before in the hotel yard, did not know where the well was
located, and the night was exceedingly dark. The next morning, while
paying my bill, the landlord said, "You probably do not know how close
was your calculation last night. I had that well dug myself, and we went
down forty feet without finding water. Before giving it up the digger had
himself lowered into the well, listening as he went to hear the sound of
some stream. At fourteen feet he heard water, and boring in laterally five
feet, where you said the stream was, he found a plentiful supply, filling the
well with twenty-three feet of water."

Another experience. One day at Wyoming, Ill., a friend said to me, "I must
introduce you to our 'water-witch,'" who proved to be a gentleman named
——, a banker of the place. After some conversation with him, we agreed
to try an experiment together and compare experiences generally. I asked
first, "What do you use?" "Willow, hazel or peach—perhaps any green twig
would do as well; but I only employ those three." "What would you say to
an old barrel hoop?" I asked. "Oh, that would not do at all; there must be
sap in the wood." We each took our rod and went forth, I holding mine in
my hands, whilst my companion held one end of his in his teeth, the other
in both hands. I asked what he meant by that mode of holding the switch.
He replied, "That is my way; there is no chance for presumption or pretence
in it; some persons can make the switch turn and be deceived." I observed
that our switches moved at the same moment, mine turning down, his
sidewise; but in every case we agreed, and thus traced a number of streams.

I tried his plan, but it would not answer, while his switch moved held in
either way. In discussing the matter, I asked his theory, which he declined to
give, but which I divined by a question he asked, viz: "Did you ever see a
switch turn for stagnant water?" I said, "Yes." "Well," he responded, "I
never did, and the rod will not turn over stagnant water for me." "Now,"
said I, "I understand your theory; it is that the friction of running waters
underground produces an electric current which causes the switch to turn."
He admitted that I was right. "Now," I said, "I propose to explode two of
your notions at once. In the first place, let us get an old barrel hoop." I
found one, which we divided. I then went with him across the railroad
track, which at that place runs north and south. The rod turned down for
both of us at once; in this case he used the rod in his hand. "Now, you see,"
I said, "that the rail represents stagnant water, and you find that a dry twig
or stick is as good as a green one." I then obtained a piece of copper wire
from the telegraph office and gave him. He walked across the track with it
in his mouth and hands, and in every case the rod turned to the south for
him. In finding water the rod always turned for him in the direction the
stream ran. I found he knew nothing about estimating the depth beneath the
surface. He remarked that he had fancied that he knew much of the subject,
but that a man must "live and learn." I went with him to his bank, where we
threw down a rod of iron on the floor, and with our switches found the
movement to be the same at every trial. Again, we placed a silver coin on
the floor, with the same result—trying several times with his hand on my
arm. I told him that I meant to invent an instrument for finding water and
estimating its depth. A few months ago I received a letter from him, asking
after my proposed invention. This gentleman gave me a curious
confirmation of my experiment at Coloma. He related that a few days
previous a friend had been out with him to try if the switch would turn in
his hand. It did readily; but after dinner he found, upon a second trial, that
there was no movement. This mystery was soon explained by the discovery
that our neophyte was standing in his India-rubber shoes.

Another important test I made at the Naval Academy, at Annapolis, a few
years ago. I went there to look at Sir David Thompson's Electrometer, to

ascertain if it could give me a clue to something which might guide me in
the invention of the instrument in question. I could discover nothing from it,
or from the most delicate galvanometer. One of the professors, however,
asked me to give them a test. I called for a piece of iron wire, walked a few
feet, put my foot down and said "There is something immediately under
here." The board was taken up and disclosed the gas-pipe. I asked if they
were satisfied. "You are a man of quick perceptions and might have noticed
the direction of the pipe," was the answer. "Are you willing to be
blindfolded?" I consented and succeeded repeatedly in locating the pipe,
and what is more, in indicating other points of attraction to the rod, where
all said that my experiment had failed, but which proved as full a
confirmation of my theory as the lead pipe. These points were those where
the iron columns supporting the building touched the ceiling underneath.

Upon one occasion, I visited Professor Henry, of the Smithsonian Institute,
and presented the subject to him. The professor took notes in a book, and
asked for a test. I gave him several by locating the gas and water pipes. We
then sat down and the professor remarked: "This is all personal influence."
Of course, the question is none the less important or curious on this
account, and I was a little nettled at the summary disposal of the matter. I
therefore replied: "Professor Henry, you scientific men are always
behindhand in discoveries, because you will not investigate, and it is left to
those not well versed in the laws of science to ferret out mysteries and lay
them bare. I present you two things, Professor—first, I find, by insulating
myself that there is no motion of the rod, which proves electricity; second, I
show that the motion begins at a certain point—an angle of forty-five
degrees from the concealed water or metal—and the rod turns down directly
over it; thus physical science and mathematics disprove your theory." I will
say that my remarks moved the professor, who then showed a very decided
interest and asked me to come and spend the following morning with him.
Unfortunately, my departure from the city deprived me of the proposed
interview. I have had many other experiences, but the relation of them
would demand more time than it is expedient to give to them at present. I
would add that I have observed in my experiments that the smallest

underground stream affects the rod in my hand in the same degree as the
cataract of Niagara itself, and that the presence of a stove, a bar of iron, or
any other metal—a water or gas pipe, causes it to turn with the same
movement as a large mineral deposit; but it is my belief that there is a
hidden mode of distinguishing between them all, outside of all questions of
personal influence. We know that in what we call the dark age of the world,
all unexplained phenomena were referred to personal witchcraft. We, as yet,
know little of the many phenomena of electricity, and in the midst of our
own intelligent population we find, that, to very many, the working of the
electric telegraph itself is ascribed to superhuman agency. Only a few days
ago an intelligent telegraph operator and his wife, at Horican, thought the
spirits were communicating with him through the wires because they heard
the air "Home, Sweet Home" in their vibrations—not knowing that he was
receiving a musical message from the newly invented telephone, played at
Chicago, many miles distant.

I have desired to show that the use of the "divining rod" is at least as old as
the Mosaic dispensation; that the knowledge or tradition of its use has been
understood, to some extent, by certain "wise" men in all ages, and that in
the present age—one of inquiry and research—many have a knowledge of it
and make use of it to their own advantage; that there is no superstition in
the matter, but that it is governed by fixed laws; that it requires only
intelligent research and earnest investigation to understand them
thoroughly, and, finally, to arrive at results of the greatest practical benefit
to mankind.

When we understand that the earth is a great electric ball, giving and
receiving electricity with the nature of the conductors which transport or
absorb the various currents, we may arrive at more comprehensive and
correct theories about natural phenomena.

I picked up, a few days since, a periodical containing an admirable article
on the Electric Telegraph, describing most vividly the motion of the
currents, and I make use of the words of the writer to illustrate how it is
possible to bring this subject to a scientific test:

"The observer, whom we have supposed capable of seeing electricity, would
find that the whole surface of the earth, the atmosphere and probably the
fathomless space beyond, were teeming with manifestations of the electric
force. Every chemical process and every blow in nature or in art evolves it.
The great process of vegetation and the reciprocal process of animal life all
over the globe are accompanied by it. As incessantly as the sun's rays pass
around the earth, warming every part in alternation with the cooling
influences of night, great currents or fluctuations of magnetic tension,
which never cease their play, circulate about the globe, and other apparently
irregular currents come and go according to laws not yet understood; while
the aurora borealis, flaming in the sky, indicates the measureless extent of
this wonderful power, the existence of which the world has but begun to
discover. Our observer would see that these great earth currents infinitely
transcend the little artificial currents which men produce in their insulated
wires, and that they constantly interfere with the latter, attracting or driving
them from their work, and making them play truant, greatly to the vexation
of the operators and sometimes to the entire confusion of business. If a
thunder-storm passed across the country, he would see all the wires
sparkling with unusual excitement. When the rain fell and water, which is a
conductor, trickled along the wires and stood in drops upon the insulators,
he would see the electricity of the line deserting its path and stealing off
slyly, in greater or less quantities, over the wet surface of the insulators or
by the wet straws or kite strings which sometimes hang across the line.
Now and then he might see the free electricity of the storm overleap the
barriers and take possession for the moment of some unguarded circuit,
frightening operators from their posts. Such an observer would realize what
it is difficult adequately to conceive, that electricity is, as has been said, the
hidden force in nature, and still remains, as far as man is concerned, almost
dormant. A high scientific authority has remarked, in speaking of metals,
that the abundance of any object in nature, bears a proportion to its
adaptation to the service of man. If this be true in general, we may expect
electricity will become, one day, a familiar thing."

I conclude with a word from the wise and godly man I have before cited:
"Oh that mine enemy would write a book," cried Job. Of course, he meant a
book setting forth some new-fangled idea which he knew would bring upon
its author the whole army of cavilers. This my little book or essay may
bring upon me the same legions, grown mightier with the centuries which
have elapsed since Job's day. To them, I can only reply, "Truth is mighty
and will prevail."

From Dr. Ashburner in Reichenbach's Dynamics of Magnetism.

However vulgar and absurd, because, perhaps, not severely exact to
habitually erroneous thinkers themselves, may appear much of the
knowledge floating among boors and peasants, a very remarkable proof of
the importance of some of it is seen in a singular, though rude anticipation
of a part of the most brilliant of Professor Faraday's discoveries on
magnetism and diamagnetism by means of an instrument, the name of
which has been sufficient to excite the contempt of some so-styled savans
of repute. If knowledge be not in the range of the thoughts of certain severe
cogitators, it is then forsooth, no knowledge at all. The unmerciful contempt
which has been cast on the divining rod—virgula divina or baguette
divinatoire—by certain cultivators of science may be estimated by a
reference to the earlier editions of a translation by Dr. Hutton, of Montucla's
improvement of Ozanam's Mathematical Recreations, a book full of most
interesting matter.—In the last edition of that work, however, Dr. Hutton
proved himself to be, what he always was, a sincere lover of truth. Led into
error at an earlier period, he was open to inquiry, and became, subsequently,
convinced of facts, the existence of which he had at one time doubted. My
friend, Mr. Charles Hutton Gregory, lent me a copy of the Speculum Anni
for the year, 1828, in which he pointed out some passages relating to this
matter which I cannot avoid extracting here, and premising a few
observations on the instrument called the divining rod, virgula divina,
baculus divinatorius, baguette divinatoire. This has been supposed to be a
branch of a tree or shrub, necessarily of a forked or letter V shape, by the

assistance of which, certain gifted persons were enabled to discover mines,
springs of water underground, hidden treasures, and to practice other occult
doings. This, with regard to shape, is just as vulgar an error as that which
supposes that a stick of any kind of wood, held in the hand, serves as well
as the hazel or white thorn, for the production of the phenomena. In the
counties of Somerset, Devon and Cornwall, the facts on this subject are
well known, and the practice of "dowsing," as it is called, has been
cultivated time out of mind. In France, the men of scientific pursuit have for
the most part ridiculed the use of the baguette, notwithstanding abundant
evidence in various parts of the country being extant of the success which
has attended the practice of the sourciers. The Baron Von Reichenbach has
established facts regarding the emanation of lights from graves which are
quite as remarkable as the proofs of emanations taking place from metals or
from running water. Now that the Baron's researches and the concurrent
testimony of the cultivators of mesmeric science have established that
certain individuals are more susceptible of magnetic impressions than
others, it will not be pronounced impossible that subterraneous running
water may influence some persons and not others. In different classes the
sensitive powers are known to vary greatly as they do indeed among those
of the same species. "But," it has been asked, "granting that emanations
from subterraneous waters may powerfully effect certain persons, what
connection is there between this impression and the motion or rotation of
the hazel rod which is held in the person's hand or laid over his fingers?"
What! is it fact that the hazel rod or white thorn moves or rotates in the
hands of a person of a certain impressionability, when that person passes
over any ground underneath his footsteps on which there happens to be a
metallic lode or a subterraneous stream of water which we call a spring? I
have been informed by highly respectable persons, who have in the West of
England, witnessed the facts, that under these circumstances a hazel or a
white thorn rod does rotate and does move and occasionally dips with so
energetic a force that on one occasion the bark of a fresh hazel rod was
stripped from the stick and left in the grasp of the operator's hand.

The following extracts will further illustrate the subject: "Although the
effects or motion of the divining rod, when in the proximity of springs, has
been and is to this day considered by most philosophers a mere illusion, yet
I think the following brief observations relating to the subject, and which
was communicated to Dr. Hutton by a lady of rank, with the account of her
subsequent experiments performed before him, his family and a number of
friends, (as given in the Doctor's translation of Montucla's edition of
Ozanam's Recreations), must convince the most incredulous that in the
hands of some persons in certain situations the baguette is forcibly acted on
by some unknown, invisible cause. Notwithstanding the incredulity
expressed by Montucla relative to the indication of springs by the baguette
or divining rod, there appears to exist such evidences of the reality of that
motion as it seems next to be impossible to be questioned. This evidence
was brought about in the following manner. Soon after the publication of
the former edition of the Recreations, the editor received by the post the
following well written pseudonymous letter on the subject of this problem.
The letter in question is dated Feb. 10, 1805, and, as with the whole
correspondence it would be too long for our limits, I shall select such parts
only as are immediately essential to a right understanding of the subject.

"The lady observes, 'In the year 1772, (I was then nineteen), I passed six
months at Aix, in Provence. I there heard the popular story of one of the
fountains in that city having been discovered by a boy who always
expressed an aversion for passing one particular spot, crying out each time
there was water. This was held by myself and by the family I was with, in
utter contempt. In the course of the spring the family went to pass a week at
the Chateau d'Ansonis, situated a few miles to the north of the Durance, a
tract of country very mountainous and where water was ill supplied. We
found the Marquis d'Ansonis busied in erecting what may be termed a
miniature aqueduct to convey a spring the distance of half a league, or
nearly as much, to his chateau, which spring he asserted had been found out
by a peasant, who made the discovery of water his occupation in that
country, and maintained himself by it, and was known by the appellation of
L'Homme a la Baguette. This account was received with unbelief almost

amounting to derision. The Marquis, piqued with being discredited, sent for
the man and requested we would witness the experiment. A large party of
French and English accordingly attended. The man was quite a peasant in
manners and appearance: he produced some twigs cut from a hazel, of
different sizes and strength, only they were forked branches, and hazel was
preferred as forking more equally than most other trees, but it was not
requisite that the angle should be of any particular number of degrees. He
held the ends of the twigs between each forefinger and thumb, with the
vertex pointing downwards. Standing where there was no water, the
baguette remained motionless. Walking gradually to the spot where the
spring was under ground, the twig was sensibly affected; and, as he
approached the spot, began to turn round; that is, the vertex raised itself and
turned towards his body, and continued to turn till the point was vertical; it
then descended outwards, and continued to turn, describing a circle as long
as he remained standing over the spring, or till one or both the branches
were broken by the twisting, the ends being firmly grasped by the fingers
and thumbs, and the hands kept stationary, so that the rotary motion must,
of course, twist them. After seeing him do this repeatedly, the whole party
tried the baguette in succession, but without effect. I chanced to be the last.
No sooner did I hold the twig as directed than it began to move as with him,
which startled me so much, that I dropt it and felt considerably agitated. I
was, however, induced to resume the experiment, and the effect was perfect.
I was then told it was no very unusual thing, many having that faculty—
which, from what has since come to my knowledge, I have reason to
believe is true. On my return to England I forbore to let this faculty (or
whatever you may term it) be known, fearing to become the topic of
conversation or discussion. But two years afterwards, being on a visit to a
nobleman's house, Kimbolton, Huntingdonshire, and his lady lamenting that
she was disappointed of building a dairy house on a spot she particularly
wished, because there was no water to be found—a supply she looked on as
essential—under promise of secresy I told her I would endeavor to find a
spring. I accordingly procured some hazel twigs, and in the presence of
herself and husband, walked over the ground proposed, till the twig turned
with considerable force. A stake was immediately driven into the ground to

mark the spot, which was not very distant from where they had before sunk.
They then took me to another and distant building in the park, and desired
me to try there. I found the baguette turn very strong, so that it soon twisted
and broke. The gentleman persisted that there was no water there, unless at
a great depth, the foundation being very deep (a considerable stone cellar)
and that no water appeared when they dug for it. I could only reply that I
knew no more than from the baguette turning, and that I had too little
experience of its powers or certainty, to answer for the truth of its
indications. He then acknowledged that when that building was erected they
were obliged to drive piles for the whole foundation, as they met with
nothing but a quicksand. This induced him to dig in the spot I first directed.
They met with a very fluent spring; the dairy was built and it is at this time
supplied by it. I could give a long detail of other trials I have made, all of
which have been convincing of the truth, but they would be tedious. For
some years past, I have been indifferent about its becoming known, and
have consequently been frequently requested to show the experiment,
which has often been done to persons of high estimation for understanding
and knowledge, and I believe they have all been convinced. Three people I
have met with who have, on trying, found themselves possessed of the same
faculty. I shall add only one more particular incident. Having once shown it
to a party, we returned into the house to a room on the ground floor. I was
again asked how I held the twig. Taking one in my hand, I found it turned
immediately; on which an old lady, mother to the gentleman of the house,
said that room was formed out of an old cloister, in which cloister was a
well, simply boarded over when they made the room.

"'L'Homme a la Baguette, from experience, could with tolerable accuracy,
tell the depth at which the springs were, and their volume, from the force
with which the baguette turned; I can only give a rough guess. In strong
frost, I think its powers not so great. On a bridge or in a boat, I think it has
no effect—the water must be under ground to affect the baguette, and
running through wooden pipes acts the same as a spring. I can neither make
the baguette turn where there is no water, nor prevent it from turning where
there is any, and I am perfectly ignorant of the cause why it turns. The only

sensation I am conscious of, is, an emotion similar to that felt on being
startled by sudden noise, or surprise of any kind.

"'I generally use a baguette about six inches from the vertex to the ends of
the twigs where they are cut off.

"'I shall most probably be in London next winter, and will (if you wish it)
afford you an opportunity of making your own observations on this curious
fact.'

"The lady arrived in London, wrote to Dr. Hutton to inform him that she
proposed being in Woolwich on Friday, the 30th inst., (May, 1806,) at
eleven in the forenoon. 'Accordingly,' says Dr. H., 'at the time appointed, the
lady, with all her family, arrived at my house at Woolwich Common, where,
after preparing the rods, etc., they walked out to the grounds, accompanied
by the individuals of my own family and some friends; when Lady ——
showed the experiment several times in different places, holding the rods,
etc., in the manner as described in her Ladyship's first letter above given. In
the places where I had good reason to know that no water was to be found,
the rod was always quiescent; but in other places, where I knew there was
water below the surface, the rods turned slowly and regularly, in the manner
above described, till the twigs twisted themselves off below the fingers,
which were considerably indented by so forcibly holding the rods between
them.

"'All the company present stood close around the lady, with all eyes intently
fixed on her hands and the rods, to watch if any particular motion might be
made by the fingers, but in vain; nothing of the kind was perceived, and all
the company could observe no cause or reason why the rods should move in
the manner they were seen to do. After the experiments were ended, every
one of the company tried the rods in the same manner as they saw the lady
had done, but without the least motion from any of them. And, in my
family, among ourselves, we have since then several times tried if we could
possibly cause the rod to turn by means of any trick, or twisting of the
fingers held in the manner the lady did; but in vain; we had no power to
accomplish it.'

"The annexed figure represents the form and position of the rod, about six
inches in length, cut off just below the joint or junction of the two twigs.

"There can be no impropriety in stating now that the lady in question was
the Honorable Lady Milbanke, wife of Sir Ralph Milbanke, Bart.,
(afterward Noel,) and mother of the present Dowager Lady Byron, wife and
widow of the great poet. A very interesting analogous statement relating to
the same person will be found in the Quarterly Review for March, 1820,
No. XLIV, volume 22.

"Lately, in France, the Count de Tristan has published a work on the
subject, and a most interesting volume, containing two memoirs, has been
written by M. Thouvenel, a physician of reputation in France, who was
commissioned in the year 1781, by the king, to analyze and report upon the
mineral and medicinal waters of the kingdom. The author undertakes a
patient and laborious investigation, in the spirit of a philosopher, and
regards his inquiries as leading to a new thread in the tangled skein of
physics, which, like any fact of science, may lead to the discovery of a
thousand others; a fact which may have escaped the vigilant sagacity of
observers, or which may have been totally abandoned to the blind credulity
of worthy soft-headed persons, or, in short, since the reign of a kind of false
philosophy, the offspring of scientific pride, may have been delivered over
to the presumption of men of false wisdom. Thouvenel found a man named
Bleton, whose business was that of a sourcier, or discoverer of springs by
means of the divining rod, and upon this man he made more than six

hundred observations, many of them in the presence of above one hundred
and fifty persons, mostly of important stations, and very creditable from
their high character, who testify to the truth of the observed phenomena.
Among others, was M. Jadelet, professor of physic at Nancy, a man eminent
for his abilities, who was not only a witness of these experiments, but was
actually concerned in the greatest part of them. As in the case of Lady
Milbanke, with Bleton an internal feeling was coincident with the
movement of the rod. Whenever this man was in a place where there existed
subterraneous waters, he was immediately sensible of a lively impression,
referable to the diaphragm, which he called his "commotion." This was
followed by a sense of oppression in the upper part of the chest; at the same
time he felt a shock, with general tremor and chilliness, staggering of the
legs, stiffness of the wrists, with twitchings, a concentrated pulse, which
gradually diminished. All these symptoms were more or less strong,
according to the volume and depth of the water, and they were more
sensibly felt when Bleton went in a direction against the subterranean
current than when he followed its course. Stagnant water under ground did
not affect him; nor did open sheets of water, ponds, lakes or rivers affect
him. The nervous system of this man must have been susceptible, since he
was more sensibly affected by change of weather and variations in the
atmosphere than other persons; otherwise he appeared healthy. A severe
acute disorder had absolutely at one time deprived him of the faculty of
perceiving water, and his sensibility in this respect did not return until three
months after his recovery; so that if he were sensitive, he could not be
classed among the sick sensitive.

"But however remarkable these constitutional peculiarities may have been,
there was in Bleton's case a more than usual distinctness in the behavior of
the divining rod. Unlike many sourciers, he did not grasp it closely; he did
not warm it in his hands; he did not prefer a young, hard branch, forked,
newly plucked and full of sap. His custom was to place horizontally on his
forefinger and thumb a rod of any kind of wood (except elder), fresh or dry,
not forked, only a little curved or bent. A very straight rod failed to turn on
its axis, but a bent rod turned on its axis with more or less rapidity,

according to the quantity of the water and the force of the current.
Thouvenel counted from thirty-five to eighty revolutions in a minute, and
always noted an exact proportion between the rotation of the rod and the
convulsive motions of Bleton. If these memoirs be critically examined, it
will be found that the author experimented with full care to avoid every
source of fallacy. The natural motions of the rod on Bleton's fingers were
backward, but as soon as he withdrew from the spring over which he stood,
in any direction whatever, the rod, which instantly ceased to turn, was
subject to a new law, for at a determinate distance from the spring an action
of rotation in a direction contrary to the former one took place. This was
invariable, and upon measuring the distance of the spot where this
retrograde phenomenon took place, from the spring, the depth could
generally be found.

"I pass over an account of numerous experiments made by this intelligent
and careful observer, pointing out the analogies of the known phenomena of
electricity and magnetism, by modifications resulting to the sensibility of
Bleton, and the rotation of the rod by various ingenious electrical and
magnetic trials suggested by the inventive sagacity of Thouvenel, in order
to arrive at the curious anticipations of some of Professor Faraday's
discoveries, by means of the sensibility of Bleton and the invariable laws
which regulated the rotation of the divining rod, when the experiments were
made over places where various substances had been concealed under
ground. It was found that whether the trials were made in this manner, or
over masses of coal, subterraneous currents of water or metallic veins, the
divining rod indicated a determined sphere of electric activity, and was, in
fact, an electrometrical rod. 'Of all the phenomena relating to the distinction
of fossil bodies,' says Thouvenel, 'acting by their electrical emanations,
doubtless the most surprising is this: upon the mines of iron, of whatever
kind they may be, the rods supported by the fingers of Bleton turned
constantly on their axes from behind forward, as upon the mines of coal;
while upon other metallic mines, as upon other metals extracted from their
mines, the rotary movement took place in the contrary direction, that is to
say, from before backward. This circular movement, which never varies

while Bleton is in a perpendicular position over mines or upon metals,
presents revolutions as rapid and as regular as the revolutions in the
contrary direction upon the mines of iron and coal.'

"The constitutional effects of spasms and convulsive twitchings took place
more or less in all the veins, but copper emanations excited very strong and
disagreeable spasmodic symptoms, accompanied by pains about the heart,
by flatulent movements in the bowels, and by abundant eructations of air.
On lead, there seemed to be less unpleasant consequences, but stronger
again on the mines of antimony. Having previously determined that for
Bleton, on all the metals except iron, there existed a sphere of electric
activity which propagated itself toward the west, a great number of
experiments were made, which always had the same results. At the depth of
two, three or four feet under ground were buried gold, silver, copper, tin,
lead and iron. The weight of each was only from five to eight pounds. In
other similar pits, pyrites of all kinds, sulphur, coal, resin, wax and lard
were buried. All these different deposits were made at distances from each
other in gardens or in open country, and they were so well covered over and
concealed, that nothing could be perceived but private marks, to be known
only by certain assistants. Over the resin, wax and lard, Bleton experienced
nothing. Over the coal, there was a decided effect, the convulsive tremor of
muscle was manifest, and the rod rotated from behind forward. Over the
iron, the same indications, but more energetic. A feeble impression from the
sulphur, but sufficient to establish a difference between it and the two
preceding; and the rod over the sulphur turned from before backward.
Pyrites produced the same rotation as sulphur, and a slight tendency of the
electric sphere toward the west. Gold and copper especially exhibited
strongly this singular tendency of the active electric emanations. Over
silver, tin and lead, also, it was more remarkable. It extends itself more or
less from the focus of the metals according to their depth and their mass.
For example, in describing a circle having a radius of three or four feet from
this focus, Bleton felt absolutely no action except on the line of the west. It
was the same when, in proceeding from the vertical point of the focus, he
successively traversed all the radii of the circle, or even if he went from all

the points of the circumference to proceed to the center. In these two
inverse proceedings it was always only on the radii going westward, that his
person and the rods were affected by movements more or less intense,
according to the kinds of metal.

"It must, however, be admitted that the action of these metals presenting
only the differences of greater or less in degree, either in the nervous and
muscular impressions of the body or in the circular revolutions of the rods
constantly moved from before backward, these differences do not yield a
certain means of distinguishing the five metals one from the other. The
object Thouvenel had in view was nevertheless fulfilled, for he had
established the extent and the determination of a sphere of electric activity
towards the west in certain metals and on sulphur which does not exist in
the same manner, on iron, on coal, or on streams of water.

"To give a summary then of the relations of these phenomena to those
established by Professor Faraday, it may be said that over iron mines, the
divining rod assumes a movement of rotation diametrically opposite to that
which it exhibits over all other mines. When iron and other metals are
extracted from their ores and deposited under ground, the phenomenon
occurs with the same distinction, that is to say, with the iron it rotates
towards the north. With all other metals submitted to trial, its action is from
east to west. The influence of the red metals seems to be more energetic
than that of the white. But with regard to this divining rod, let one condition
be remarked—the relation of the organic substance to another organic and
living power of matter, to a human being in a certain susceptible state of
nervous system. Thouvenel describes the symptoms which affected Bleton
when he was in the sphere of metallic action, and the rod becomes the
secondary part of a philosophical instrument composed of an
impressionable human being and a piece of stick.

"A highly respectable girl, the lady's maid of a very clever and intelligent
friend of mine residing in Hertfordshire, offers, when she is mesmerized, a
great many deeply interesting phenomena. She is as guileless and as good a
being as can be met with, and is much beloved by her excellent and amiable

mistress who has repeatedly addressed me in her case. If a piece of hazel
stick or white thorn be presented to Harriet, she grasps it and sleeps
mesmerically in less than a minute. The sleep is at first very intense and
deep, and then the stick is held so firmly that the spasmodic state of the
muscles renders it very difficult for even a powerful bystander to turn it in
her hand. Harriet P's impressionability was put to a very useful purpose.
Her mistress heard that she had a practice of 'dowsing' for water, and writes
thus to a friend, July, 1845: 'We made a carious experiment here, some days
since, with Harriet P——. We have very bad water here and have long been
unable to find a good spring. Mr. G. has in vain dug and dug for one. I
proposed the divining rod; "for" said I, "Dr. Ashburner would not think it a
foolish experiment." Harriet P. was willing, so we went forth to a field the
most likely one for a spring—Mr. and Mrs. G., myself, and two friends
staying here. We put Harriet to sleep with the hazel stick. She grasped it so
tightly we were obliged to use the gold chain. She then held it only in one
hand, and immediately began to walk, taking her own way. She went very
carefully for about twenty yards, then suddenly stopped as if she had been
shot. Not a word was uttered by any one. We all looked on, and were not a
little surprised to see the rod slowly turn round until her hand was almost
twisted backwards. It looked as if it must pain her; still no one spoke.
Suddenly she exclaimed, "There! there! don't you see the stick turn? The
water is here, under my hand. I see, oh, I see; let me look; don't speak to
me; I like to look." "How deep is the water?" said Mrs. G., speaking to
Harriet's fingers. "Oh, about three feet; I can't quite tell, but it is here." In a
moment, to our astonishment, she sank down on the grass, and took the
stick again in her hands. We made a strange group around her, as we were
all much astonished to see what we had come there to see. She seemed so
like a witch. We marked the place, and, after a few minutes, we awoke her.
In the evening she was again mesmerized to sleep, and we asked her what
she saw at the spring. "Why, I saw water, water everywhere." "Then," said
I, "how do you know where the spring is?" "Oh, because it goes trinkle,
trinkle, I know it is there." "Why did you sit down?" "Why, because I was
so giddy; it seemed as if all was water but the little piece of ground I stood
upon. I saw so much water, all fresh, no sea. I tried to see the sea but could

not; I could not at all." Mr. G. caused a large hole to be dug, and just at the
depth of three feet the water was found. A brick well has been constructed,
and there is a good supply of excellent water. No one could doubt the action
of the rod, it turned so evidently of itself in her hand. Of course, when
awake, Harriet knew nothing of the circumstance.'"

So many and so various are the testimonies and the facts relating to the
divining rod, that it would be tedious to recite the hundreds of respectable
documents offered by those authors who have written on the subject. A
work by Tardy de Montravel, printed in 1781, entitled "Memoire Physique
et Medicinale sur la Baguette Divinatoire," abounds in testimonies of the
truth of the same class of facts. One of the most curious works on this
subject, is a little book entitled "Occult Physics, or treatise on the Divining
Wand and on its utility in the discovery of springs of water, mines,
concealed treasures, thieves, and escaped murderers, with principles which
explain the most obscure phenomena of Nature," by L. L. de Vallemont,
Ph.D. This work, embellished with plates, illustrating the different kinds of
divining rods with the various modes of holding them for use, appeared at
the latter part of the seventeenth century, and passed through several
editions in France and Holland. It is remarkable for much curious literary
and historical learning, and for able statements of the arguments which were
used in the controversies rife at that period, on the realities of the facts
under consideration. It contains a curious catalogue of a great number of
mines discovered in France, by means of the divining rod, made out by a
German mineralogist employed for the purpose by the Cardinal de
Richelieu.

[From Cyclopedia Americana.]

Divining Rod.—A rod made with certain superstitions ceremonies, either
single and curved, or with two branches like a fork, of wood, brass or other
metal.

The rod is held in a particular way, and if it bends towards one side, those
who use the rod believe it to be an indication that there is treasure under the
spot.

Some publications respecting a man who, in quite recent times pretended to
be able to discover water and metals under the ground by his feelings,
attracted much attention.

Campetti, an Italian, born at Gargnano, on Lake Garda, has attracted much
attention in our time by pretending to be capable of ascertaining by his
feelings the places where metals and water exist under ground.

Many experiments seem to confirm his statements. The King of Bavaria
sent for him in 1806, and he came to Munich, where the experiments were
renewed.

These experiments were chiefly made with pendulums of sulphurous
pyrites, which are said to vibrate if brought near to metals.

Rhabdomancy is the power considered by some as existing in particular
individuals, partly natural and partly acquired, of discovering things hid in
the earth, especially metals, ores, and bodies of water, by a change in their
perceptions, and likewise the art of aiding the discovery of these substances
by the use of certain instruments; for example, the divining rod.

That rhabdomancy, generally speaking, is little more than self-delusion, or
intentional deception, is now the opinion of most natural philosophers and
physiologists. Still it has some champions. From the most remote periods,
indications are found of the art of discovering veins of ore and water
concealed in the bowels of the earth, by a direct perception of their
existence.

The divining rod is held in the hand so that the curvature is inclined
outward. If the person who holds the rod possesses the powers of
rhabdomancy, and touches the metallic or any other magnetic substance, or
comes near them, a slow, rotatory motion of the rod ensues in different
directions, according to particular circumstances; and, as in the other cases,

no motion takes place without a direct or indirect contact with a living
person. In the South of France and Switzerland this art is frequently made
use of under the name of METALLOSCOPE (when discovering or feeling for
metals,) and of HYDROSCOPE (when discovering or feeling for water).

[From Chamber's Cyclopedia.]

The Divining Rod—often called the Virgula Divina, the Baculus
Divinatorius, the Caduceus, or Wand of Mercury, the Rod of Aaron, etc.—is
a forked branch, usually of hazel, sometimes of iron, or even brass or
copper, by which it has been pretended that minerals and water have been
discovered beneath the surface of the earth.

The rod when suspended by the two prongs, sometimes between the balls of
the thumbs, will distinctly indicate by a decided inclination, it is alleged, the
spot over which the concealed mine or spring is situated.

Many men, even of some pretensions to scientific knowledge, have been
believers in the occult power ascribed to the magic wand.

Agricola, Sperlingius, and Kirchmayer, all believed in its supernatural
influence. So did Richelet, the author of the Dictionary. The learned
Morhoff remained in suspense, while Thouvenot and Pryce, in the latter
part of the eighteenth century, gave ample records of its power.

In a work published by Dr. Herbert Mayo, in 1847 and 1851, entitled, "On
the Truth Contained in Popular Superstitions," he gave some curious
illustrations of the art, supposed to be possessed by one in forty of the
Cornish miners. At Weilbach, in Nassau, he likewise met with one Leebold,
who, he says, possessed the power, but afterwards lost it.

Arthur Phippen, in 1853, published a pamphlet containing an account of
two professional diviners, or "dowsers." One of them, named Adams, gave
remarkable indications of being able to detect water underground. He not

only was able to discover the particular spot where the water might be
found, he could even perceive a whole line of water running underground.

[From Hartwig's Subterranean World.]

As far back as the eleventh century, the divining rod came into practice and
found full credence in a superstitious age. A forked branch of hazel tree, cut
during a peculiar phase of the moon, was the means employed in Germany
for the discovery of buried treasures, of veins of metals, of deposits of salt,
or of subterranean sources.

But the miraculous rod did not indiscriminately show its power in every
hand. It was necessary to have been born in certain months, and soft and
warm, or—according to modern expression, magnetic fingers were
indispensable for handling it with effect.

The diviner possessing these qualifications took hold of the rod by its
branches so that the stem into which they united was directed upwards.

On approaching the spot where the sought for treasure lay concealed, the
magical rod slowly turned towards it, until finally the stem had fully
changed its position, pointed vertically downwards.

To increase the solemnity of the scene, the wily conjurers generally traced
magical circles, that were not to be passed, burnt strong smelling herbs and
spices, and uttered powerful charms, to disarm the enmity of the evil spirits
that were supposed to guard the hidden treasures.

[From American Cyclopedia.]

Divining Rod.—The increase of knowledge has not yet expelled even from
the educated portions of the United States all faith in the magic virtues of
this instrument.

There is a mystery in the hidden flow of subterranean courses of water, and
in the occurrence of deposits of valuable ores, which encourage a resort to
mysterious methods for discovering them.

If the wise can point to no sure clue to them, the ignorant pretender does not
fail to find one, which to many is all the more acceptable for its extravagant
pretensions and inexplicable nature. It is stated by a writer in the "American
Journal of Science," (Vol. 11, 1826,) that the divining rod has been in
frequent use since the eleventh century.

A work was published in France, in 1871, detailing six hundred experiments
made to ascertain the facts attributed to it, "by which is unfolded,"
according to this work, "their resemblance to the admirable and uniform
laws of electricity and magnetism."

These sciences still continue to be appealed to in order to support in some
vague way phenomena which defy other means of explication.

As commonly used, the divining rod is a forked, slender stick of witch
hazel; elastic twigs, however, of any sort, or even two sticks of whale-bone
fastened together at one end, do not appear to be rejected in the want of the
hazel tree.

One branch of the twig is taken in each hand between the thumb and
forefinger, the two ends pointing down. Holding the stick in this position,
the palms towards the face, the gifted operator passes over the surface of
the ground; and whenever the upper point of the stick bends over and points
downward, there he affirms the spring or metallic vein will be found.

Some even pretend to designate the distance below the surface according to
the force of the movement, or according to the diameter of the circle over
which the action is perceived, one rule being that the depth is half the
diameter of this circle; whence, the deeper the object is, below the surface,
the further is its influence exerted. It is observable that a rod so held will of
necessity turn as the hands are closed more tightly upon it, though this has
at first the appearance of serving to resist its motion. From the character of

many who use the rod and believe in it, it is also plain that this force is
exerted without any intention or consciousness on their part, and that they
are themselves honestly deceived by the movement.

On putting the experiment to the test by digging, if water is found it proves
the genuineness of the operation; if it is not found, something else is, to
which the effect is attributed, or the water which attracted the rod is sure to
be met with if the digging is only continued deep enough. Some ingenuity
is therefore necessary to expose the deception.

The writer above referred to succeeded in showing the absurdity of the
operation by taking the "diviners" over the same ground twice, the second
time blindfolded, and each time marking the points designated by the rod.
This, however, is a test to which they are not often willing to subject their
art.

Some operators do not require a forked twig. There was, in 1857, and may
be still, within less than one hundred miles from New York, a man who
believed himself gifted in the use of the divining rod, and was occasionally
sent for to go great distances, to determine the position of objects of value
sunk in the lakes, of ores and of wells of water. He carried several little
cylinders of tin, but what they contained was a secret. One had an attraction
for iron, another for copper, a third for water, etc. He had in his hand a little
rattan cane, which he used as not likely to excite the observation of those he
met.

Taking one of the cylinders out of his pocket he slipped the rattan into a
socket in its end, and holding in his hands the other end of the stick, he set
the contrivance bobbing up and down and around. That it was attracted and
drawn towards any body of ore in the vicinity he was evidently convinced.

[From Notes and Queries.]

Divining Rod.—Divination by the rod or wand is mentioned in the
prophecy of Ezekiel. Hosea, too, reproaches the Jews as being infected with
the like superstition: "My people ask counsel at their stocks and their staff
declareth unto them." Chap. iv, 12. Not only the Chaldeans used rods for
divination, but almost every nation which has pretended to that science, has
practiced the same method. Herodotus mentions it as a custom of the Alani,
and Tacitus of the old Germans. See Cambridge's "Scribleriad," book V,
note on line 21.

In the manuscript "Discourse on Witchcraft," 1705, written by Mr. John
Bell, page 41, I find the following account from Theophylact on the subject
of rabdomanteia or rod-divination: "They set up two staffs, and, having
whispered some verses and incantations, the staffs fell by the operation of
dæmons. Then they considered which way each of them fell—forward or
backward, to the right or left hand—and agreeably gave responses, having
made use of the fall of their staffs for their signs."

Dr. Henry, in his "History of Great Britain," tells us (II, 550), that after the
Anglo-Saxons and Danes embraced the Christian religion, the clergy were
commanded by the canons to preach very frequently against diviners,
sorcerers, auguries, omens, charms, incantations, and all the filth of the
wicked and dotages of the Gentiles."

The following is from "Epigrams, etc.," published London, 1651—Virgula
Divina:

"Some sorcerers do boast they have a rod,
Gathered with vowes and sacrifice,
And (borne about) will strangely nod
To hidden treasure where it lies;
Mankind is (sure) that rod divine,
For to the wealthiest (ever) they incline."

The earliest use made of the divining rod by the miners was for the
discovery of the lode. So late as three years ago (1850), the process has
been tried. The method of procedure was to cut the twig of an hazel or
apple-tree of twelve months' growth, into a forked shape, and to hold this by
both hands in a peculiar way, walking across the land until the twig bent,
which was taken as an indication of the locality of the lode. The person who
generally practises this divination boasts himself to be the seventh son of a
seventh son. The twig of hazel bends in his hands to the conviction of the
miners that ore is present; but then the peculiar manner in which the twig is
held, bringing muscular action to bear upon it, accounts for its gradual
deflection, and the circumstance of the strata walked over always
containing ore gives a further credit to the process of divination.

The vulgar notion still prevalent in the north of England of the hazel's
tendency to a vein of lead ore, seam or stratum of coal, etc., seems to be a
vestige of this rod divination.

The virgula divina or baculus divinatorius is a forked branch in the form of
a Y, cut off an hazel stick, by means whereof people have pretended to
discover mines, springs, etc., underground. The method of using it is this:
the person who bears it, walking very slowly over the places where he
suspects mines or springs may be, the effluvia exhaling from the metals, or
vapor from the water impregnating the wood, makes it dip or decline, which
is the sign of a discovery.

In the Living Library or Historical Meditations we read: "No man can tell
why forked sticks of hazill (rather than sticks of other trees growing upon
the very same places) are fit to shew the places where the veins of gold and
silver are." See Lilly's History of his Life and Times, for a curious
experiment (which he confesses, however, to have failed), to discover
hidden treasure by the hazel rod.

In the Gentleman's Magazine, for February, 1752, xxii, 77, we read: "M.
Linnæus, when he was upon his voyage to Scania, hearing his secretary
highly extol the virtues of his divining rod, was willing to convince himself
of its insufficiency, and for that purpose concealed a purse of one hundred

ducats under a ranunculus which grew by itself in a meadow and bid the
secretary find it if he could. The wand discovered nothing, and M.
Linnæus's mark was soon trampled down by the company who were
present; so that when M. Linnæus went to finish the experiment by fetching
the gold himself, he was utterly at a loss where to seek it. The man with the
wand assisted him and pronounced that it could not lie the way they were
going, but quite the contrary; so he pursued the direction of his wand and
actually dug out the gold. M. Linnæus adds, that such another experiment
would make a proselyte of him." We read in the same book for November,
1751, xxi, 507: "So early as Agricola, the divining rod was in much request,
and has obtained great credit for its discovery where to dig for metals and
springs of water; for some years past its reputation has been on the decline,
but lately it has been revived by an ingenious gentleman who, from
numerous experiments, hath good reason to believe its effects to be more
than imagination. He says that hazel and willow rods, he has by experience
found, will actually answer, with all persons in a good state of health, if
they are used with moderation and at some distance of time, and after
meals, when the operator is in good spirits. The hazel, willow and elm are
all attracted by springs of water. Some persons have the virtue
intermittently; the rod in their hands will attract one half hour and repel the
next. The rod is attracted by all metals, coals, amber and limestone, but with
different degrees of strength. The best rods are those from the hazel or nut
tree, as they are pliant and tough and cut in the winter months. A shoot that
terminates equally forked is to be met with—two single ones of a length
and size may be tied together by a thread and will answer as well as the
other."

In the supplement to the Athenian Oracle, p. 234, we read that "the
experiment of a hazel's tendency 'to a vein' of lead ore is limited to St. John
Baptist's Eve, and that with an hazel of that same year's growth."

There is a treatise in French entitled, La Phisique Occulte ou Traite de la
Baguette Divinatoire, et de son utilite pour la decouverte des sources d'Eau,
des Minieres, de Tresors caches, des Voleurs et des Meurtriers fugitifs: par

M. L. L. de Vallemont pretre et docteur en theologie; 12 mo., Amsterdam,
1693. 464 pages.

[From Brand's Popular Antiquities.]

At the end of Henry Alan's edition of Cicero's treatise De Divinatione, and
De Fate, 1839, will be found "Catalogus auctorum de divinatione ac fato, de
oraculis, de somniis, de astrologia, de dæmonibus, de magia id genus aliis."

With the divining rod seems connected a lusus naturae of ash tree bough
resembling the litui of the Roman augurs and the Christian pastoral staff
which still obtains a place, if not on this account I know not why, in the
catalogue of popular superstitions. Seven or eight years ago, I remember to
have seen one of these, which I thought extremely beautiful and curious, in
the house of an old woman at Beeralston, in Devonshire, of whom I would
most gladly have purchased it; but she declined parting with it on any
account, thinking it would be unlucky to do so. Mr. Gostling, in the
Antiquarian Repertory, ii, 164, has some observations on this subject. He
thinks the lituus or staff, with the crook at one end, which the augurs of old
carried as badges of their profession and instruments in the superstitious
exercise of it, was not made of metal but of the substance above mentioned.
Whether, says he, to call it a work of art or nature may be doubted: some
were probably of the former kind; others, Hogarth, in his Analysis of
Beauty, calls lusus naturæ found in plants of different sorts, and in one of
the plates of that work gives a specimen of a very elegant one, a branch of
ash. I should rather, continues he, style it a distemper or distortion of nature;
for it seems the effect of a wound by some insect which, piercing to the
heart of the plant with its proboscis, poisons that, while the bark remains
uninjured and proceeds in its growth, but formed into various stripes,
flatness and curves for the want of the support which nature designed it.
The beauty, some of these arrive at, might well consecrate them to the
mysterious fopperies of heathenism, and their rarity occasions imitations of
them by art. The pastoral staff of the Church of Rome seems to have been

formed from the vegetable litui, though the general idea is that it is an
imitation of the shepherd's crook. The engravings given in the Antiquarian
Repertory are of carved branches of the ash.

[From Modern Magic, by M. Shele de Vere, published 1873.]

The relations in which some men stand to nature are sometimes so close as
to enable them to make discoveries which are impossible to others.

This is, for instance, the case with persons who feel the presence of waters
or of metals. The former have, from time immemorial, generally used a
wand, the so-called divining rod, which, according to Pliny, was already
known to the ancient Etruscans as a means for the discovery of hidden
springs.

An Italian author, Amoretti, who has given special attention to this subject,
states that at least every fifth man is susceptible to the influence of water
and metals, but this is evidently an over-estimate.

In recent times many persons have been known to possess this gift of
discovering hidden springs or subterranean masses of water, and these have
but rarely employed an instrument.

Catharine Beutler, of Thurgovia, in Switzerland, and Anna Maria Brugger,
of the same place, were both so seriously affected by the presence of water
that they fell into violent nervous excitement when they happened to cross
places beneath which, large quantities were concealed, and became
perfectly exhausted.

In France, a class of men, called sourciers, have for ages possessed this
instinctive power of perceiving the presence of water, and others, like the
famous Abbe Paramelle, have cultivated the natural gift till they were
finally enabled, by a mere cursory examination of a landscape, to ascertain
whether large masses of water were hidden anywhere, and to indicate the
precise spots where they might be found.

Why water and metals should almost always go hand in hand in connection
with this peculiar gift, is not quite clear; but the staff of Hermes, having
probably the form of the divining rod was always represented as giving the
command over the treasures of the earth, and the Orphic Hymn (v. 527,)
calls it—hence, the golden rod, producing wealth and happiness.

On the other hand, the Aquæ Virga, the nymph of springs, had also a
divining rod in her hand, and Numa, inspired by a water-nymph, established
the worship of waters in connection of that of the dead. For here, also,
riches and death seem to have entered into a strange alliance.

Del Rio, in his Disquisitiones Magicæ, mentions thus the Rahuri of Spain—
the lynx-eyed, as he translates the name—who were able, on Wednesdays
and Saturdays, to discover all the veins of metals or of water beneath the
surface, all hidden treasures and corpses in their coffins.

There is at least one instance recorded, where a person possessed the power
to see even more than the Rahuris. This was a Portuguese lady, Pedegache,
who first attracted attention by being able to discover subterranean springs
and their connections, a gift which brought her great honors after she had
informed the king of all the various supplies of water which were hidden
near a palace which he was about to build. Shafts were sunk according to
her directions, and not only water was found but also various soils and
stones which she had foretold would have to be pierced.

She also seems to have cultivated her talent, for we hear of her next being
able to discover treasures, even valuable antique statues in the interior of
houses, and finally she reached such a degree of intuition that she saw the
inner parts of the human body, and pointed out their diseases and defects.

The divining rod, originally a twig of willow or hazel, is often made of
metal, and the impression prevails that in such cases an electric current
arising from the subterranean water or metals enters the diviner's body by
the feet, passes through him, and finally affects the two branches of the rod,
which represent opposite poles. It is certain that when the electric current is
interrupted, the power of the divining rod is suspended.

[From Notes and Queries.]

Perhaps, like many of your correspondents, I had imagined that the
supposed properties of the divining rod had been a discovery recently made,
either by the great American artist, Mr. Barnum, or by one of Dii Minores
of this country. To my mortification, however, I find that it is "as old as the
hills," or at least contemporaneous with the Sortes Virgilianæ, et id genus
omne. I have before me the works of Mr. Abraham Cowley, in two vols. 12
mo., London, 1681, and in one of his Pindarique Odes, addressed to Mr.
Hobs, I find the following lines:

To walk in ruines like vain ghosts, we love,
And with fond divining wands,
We search among the dead
For treasures buried.

And to these lines is added the following note:

"Virgula Divina, or divining wand, is a two-forked branch of a hazel tree
which is used for the finding out either of veins or hidden treasures of gold
or silver, and being carried about bends downwards (or rather is said to do
so,) when it comes to the place where they lye."

"In the first edition of his Mathematical Recreations, Dr. Hutton laughed at
the divining rod. In the interval between that and the second edition a lady
made him change his note, by using one before him, at Woolwich. Hutton
had the courage to publish the account of the experiment in his second
edition, after the account he had previously given. By a letter from Hutton
to Bruce, printed in the memoir of the former which the latter wrote, it
appears that the lady was Lady Milbanke."

"A Cornish lady informs me that the Cornish miners to this day use the
divining rod."

However the pretended effect of the divining rod may be attributed to
knavery and credulity by philosophers who will not take the trouble of
witnessing and investigating the operation, any one who will pay a visit to
the Mendip Hills, in Somersetshire, and the country around their base, may
have abundant proof of the efficacy of it. Its success has been very
strikingly proved along the range of the Pennard Hills, also, to the south of
the Mendip. The faculty of discovering water by means of the divining rod
is not possessed by every one, for indeed there are but few who possess it in
any considerable degree, or in whose hands the motion of the rod, when
passing over an underground stream, is very decided, and they who have it
are quite unconscious of their capability until made aware of it by
experiment.

I saw the operation of the rod, or rather of a fork formed by the shoots of
the last year, held in the hands of the experimenter by the extremities, with
the angle projecting before him. When he came over the spot beneath which
the water flowed, the rod, which had before been perfectly still, writhed
about with considerable force, so that the holder could not keep it in its
former position, and he appealed to the bystanders to notice that he had
made no motion to produce this effect, and used every effort to prevent it.
The operation was several times repeated with the same result, and each
time under the close inspection of shrewd and doubting, if not incredulous
observers. Forks of any kind of green wood served equally well, but those
of dead wood had no effect. The experimenter had discovered water, in
several instances, in the same parish (Pennard), but was perfectly unaware
of his capability till he was requested by his landlord to try. The operator
had the reputation of a perfectly honest man, whose word might be safely
trusted, and who was incapable of attempting to deceive any one—as
indeed appeared by his open and ingenuous manner and conversation on
this occasion. He was a farmer, and respected by all his neighbors. So
general is the conviction of the efficacy of the divining rod in discovering
both water and the ores of calameni or zinc all over the Mendip, that the
people are quite astonished when any doubt is expressed about it. The late
Dr. Hutton wrote against the pretension, as one of many instances of

deception founded upon gross ignorance and credulity, when a lady of
quality, who herself possessed the faculty, called upon him and gave him
experimental proof, in the neighborhood of Woolwich, that water was
discoverable by that means. This, Dr. Hutton afterwards publicly
acknowledged.

After delivering my essay before the Civil Engineers' Club of the
Northwest, the following letter was forwarded to me by the secretary:

Brownsville, Tenn.

Gentlemen:—I notice that at a meeting of your honorable Club,
Mr. Latimer read an essay upon the subject of the "Divining
Rod," and seemed to be at a loss to know how to tell whether the
rod's movements pointed to or indicated any particular substance
under the earth. I am now seventy-three years of age, and have
been studying and experimenting with it since twenty years of
age. I am not satisfied what causes the motion of it in my hands,
but by experimenting, I can tell to a certainty whether I am over
any substance, either water or mineral, or whether it is sulphur,
salt or any other kind of water.

I am glad that investigation in this is being made by scientific
men, and hope some day it may profit man. For any information
you may want, address me at Brownsville, Tennessee.

Very respectfully,

Harry Sangster.

Upon receipt of this letter from Mr. Sangster, I wrote to him asking him to
explain to me upon what principle he could discover the difference between

metals and water, and between one kind of water and another. To this I have
received the following answer, just in time to add it to this publication:

Brownsville, May 10, 1876.

C. Latimer, Esq., Cleveland, Ohio:

Dear Sir:—Your favor of the 5th inst. is before me; also that of
the 15th ult. You must excuse me for not answering the latter
sooner, owing to ill health and other causes. I am glad to furnish
you all the information in my power relative to the matter in
question, because I would like to see it developed—as I believe it
will be eventually—into a tangible, practical and useful science.
The prejudice now prevailing against it will, in my opinion, ere
long be dispelled. It is impossible for me, in the space of a letter,
to give a full statement of my views, theory and experience on
the subject of finding the locality of metals, minerals and water
under the surface of the ground; but will endeavor to answer the
inquiry of your first letter as concisely and explicitly as possible.

I understand fully the method of calculating the depth of water
beneath the surface. What you wish to know is, after the
substance is shown to exist beneath a certain point, whether it be
mineral, metal or water, and the kind, character and description
of each. As you are aware of the fact, the simple "forked rod"
will indicate the presence of either of these. Now, to tell which of
these it is, and the character of the same; if it be water, the kind
of water. This is my method of testing the same, whether it be
water, mineral or metal: It is on the principle of affinity—the
attraction that like substances have for each other. After the rod
indicates the particular spot, I take a sponge and saturate it with
ordinary drinking water, either from spring or well, and put it on
the top of the rod, and test it with this. If the substance beneath
be water, and the same kind of that in the sponge, it will turn
much stronger, and the demonstration be more active and

powerful. But, if the rod should not turn at all, it will be some
other substance, either mineral or metal. To test the kind of water,
after I am satisfied that it is water—to discover, for instance,
whether it be sulphur water, I dip my sponge in that kind of
water, and test as above. If the movement of the rod be active and
strong when this is done, the water below will be that species of
water. If salt water, dip the sponge in that kind of water, and the
result will be similar; and so on through the whole catalogue of
waters.

In regard to the metals. The tests are made in a similar manner.
After I discover by proper tests that it is a metal, which are as
follows: If it be metal or mineral, after the sponge is saturated
with water, the rod will not act at all. I then put a piece of metal
on the top of the rod; first, a small bit of iron. If there is no
movement of the rod at the spot already indicated, it is safe to
conclude that the substance is not of that nature; so I continue the
experiment with different kinds of metal—lead, silver, copper,
tin, gold, etc., until I find some one of these that will cause the
rod to turn and operate in a manner sufficiently strong and
satisfactory. The same method pertains to the minerals. Of
course, a great deal of the practical operations of these various
tests, will depend upon one's discretion and judgment at the time
they are made, which it is impossible to put upon paper. This is
but a general outline of the system.

If I can be of any further assistance to you in the investigation of
this subject, do not fail to let me know of it. Would be pleased to
hear from you at any and all times. Be sure and send me your
pamphlet.

Yours, respectfully,

Harry Sangster.

Immediately after receiving this letter, I made some experiments as follows:
I took a green, forked twig, and found that over iron water-pipe, gas-pipe,
and over a cistern of water, it turned down vigorously. I then took a wet rag
and fastened it on top of the twig or rod. As Mr. Sangster testifies, I found it
powerless over the iron water-pipe and over the gas-pipe, but it turned
rapidly over the cistern. I put a key on the end of the rod over the wet rag;
then the rod turned over both iron pipes promptly. Again, I took off the rag
and put the key on the rod, and walking to the cistern, found that there was
no movement. I took off the key and the rod turned instantly. I have no
doubt but that he is correct as regards other metals.

CONCLUSION.

If any one, after the perusal of these pages, is disposed to doubt the efficacy
of the divining rod, he will find it at least difficult to explain the
coincidences between my experiences and those of the various persons
presented in the foregoing pages—all confirming most fully conclusions
reached by me, after many experiments made when quite alone. And, he
must be even more eccentric than L'Homme à la Baguette, who does not
find in the subject a treasure hidden, well worthy of his research.

It will be noticed that I can lay claim to no originality, or rather to no
knowledge beyond that of the greater number of the parties mentioned, in
regard to the fact of the discovery of minerals or waters; but, I find myself
in advance in two essentials. First, I absolutely proved, by insulating myself
on glass or India rubber sandals, that the electric emanations were cut off.
Secondly, that these emanations universally radiate at an angle of forty-five
degrees from the horizontal, and thus the calculation of the depth below the
surface, is simply the solution of a mathematical problem.

In this theory of the invariable law of electric emanations, I have received
the strongest confirmation in the perusal of Baron Von Reichenbach's
Dynamics of Magnetism. By numerous and varied experiments,
Reichenbach proved that from metals, and especially from magnets, there is
a constant emanation of electric flame upward, at an angle of forty-five
degrees with the horizon. For a more serious study of the subject, I refer the
reader to the work itself, which is full of curious and well authenticated
experiences.

Finally, I would paraphrase the words of my friend, the renowned Pedro
Garcia: "To thee, whomsoever thou art, who mayst have the genius to
investigate and the courage to face wise fools, I predict a valuable
discovery, which will benefit the human race."

THE END.

Transcriber's Note:

Minor typographical errors have been corrected without note.

Irregularities and inconsistencies in the text have been retained as printed.

*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE DIVINING
ROD: VIRGULA DIVINA—BACULUS DIVINATORIUS (WATER-
WITCHING) ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
States without permission and without paying copyright royalties.
Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license,
apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic
works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and
trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not
be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of
the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the Project
Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for copies of this
eBook, complying with the trademark license is very easy. You may
use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative
works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg eBooks
may be modified and printed and given away—you may do practically
ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S.
copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license,
especially commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG™ LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or
any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
Gutenberg License available with this file or online at
www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing
Project Gutenberg electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg electronic
work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept
all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
all copies of Project Gutenberg electronic works in your possession. If
you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg
electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms of this
agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom
you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people
who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg electronic
works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the
collection of Project Gutenberg electronic works. Nearly all the
individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the
United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in
the United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
that you will support the Project Gutenberg mission of promoting free
access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg works
in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project
Gutenberg name associated with the work. You can easily comply with
the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format
with its attached full Project Gutenberg License when you share it
without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
other Project Gutenberg work. The Foundation makes no
representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
access to, the full Project Gutenberg License must appear prominently
whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg work (any work on which
the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase
“Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed,
viewed, copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States
and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no

restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
under the terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License included with
this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located
in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the
country where you are located before using this eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg electronic work is derived
from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a
notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright
holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the United
States without paying any fees or charges. If you are redistributing or
providing access to a work with the phrase “Project Gutenberg”
associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply either with
the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain
permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg
trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
will be linked to the Project Gutenberg License for all works posted
with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of
this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide

access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg work in a format
other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official
version posted on the official Project Gutenberg website
(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of
obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain
Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the
full Project Gutenberg License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg electronic works provided
that:

• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from the
use of Project Gutenberg works calculated using the method you
already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the
owner of the Project Gutenberg trademark, but he has agreed to donate
royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days
following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to
prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly
marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information about
donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”

• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does
not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You
must require such a user to return or destroy all copies of the works
possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use of and all
access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.

• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the

electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
receipt of the work.

• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free distribution
of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™
electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth
in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of the
Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in
Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend
considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and
proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the
Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may be
stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete,
inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES -
Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in
paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation,
the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party
distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this
agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and
expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO
REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH
OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE
FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY
DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE

LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT,
CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES
EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you
discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it,
you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by
sending a written explanation to the person you received the work
from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must return
the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity that
provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a
replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work
electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to
give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu
of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a
refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If
any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law
of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the
Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the
Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any
volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution
of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability,

costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly
from any of the following which you do or cause to occur: (a)
distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg work, (b) alteration,
modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg work,
and (c) any Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project
Gutenberg

Project Gutenberg is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg’s goals
and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg collection will remain freely
available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure and
permanent future for Project Gutenberg and future generations. To
learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and
the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the state
of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue
Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification number is
64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S.
federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 41 Watchung Plaza
#516, Montclair NJ 07042, USA, +1 (862) 621-9288. Email contact
links and up to date contact information can be found at the
Foundation’s website and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small
donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax
exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United States.
Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a considerable
effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up with these
requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where we have
not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other

ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg
electronic works

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg
concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project
Gutenberg eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search facility:
www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg, including
how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.