Men of the Old Stone Age_ Their Environment_ Life and Art Henry Fairfield Osborn 1235 downloads.pdf

792 pages · Make another flipbook

Page 1

Page 2

Page 3

The Project Gutenberg eBook of Men of the Old Stone Age:
Their Environment, Life and Art
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you
will have to check the laws of the country where you are located
before using this eBook.

Title: Men of the Old Stone Age: Their Environment, Life and Art

Author: Henry Fairfield Osborn

Release date: September 27, 2013 [eBook #43820]
Most recently updated: October 23, 2024

Language: English

Other information and formats: www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/43820

Credits: Produced by Bryan Ness and the Online Distributed
Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was
produced from images generously made available by The
Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries.)

*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK MEN OF THE
OLD STONE AGE: THEIR ENVIRONMENT, LIFE AND ART ***

Page 4

MEN OF THE OLD STONE AGE
THEIR ENVIRONMENT, LIFE AND ART

HITCHCOCK LECTURES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
1914

Page 5

Pl. I. Neanderthal man at the
station of Le Moustier,
overlooking the valley of
the Vézère, Dordogne.
Drawing by Charles R.
Knight, under the
direction of the author.

MEN OF
THE OLD STONE AGE
THEIR ENVIRONMENT, LIFE
AND ART

BY

HENRY FAIRFIELD OSBORN
SC.D. PRINCETON, HON. LL.D. TRINITY, PRINCETON, COLUMBIA, HON. D.SC.
CAMBRIDGE
HON. PH.D. CHRISTIANIA
RESEARCH PROFESSOR OF ZOOLOGY, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
VERTEBRATE PALÆONTOLOGIST U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, CURATOR EMERITUS OF
VERTEBRATE
PALÆONTOLOGY IN THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY

ILLUSTRATIONS BY
UPPER PALÆOLITHIC ARTISTS
AND

Page 6

CHARLES R. KNIGHT, ERWIN S. CHRISTMAN
AND OTHERS

NEW YORK
CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS
1915

Copyright, 1915, BY
CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS
Published November, 1915

DEDICATED
TO
MY DISTINGUISHED GUIDES THROUGH THE UPPER
PALÆOLITHIC CAVERNS OF
THE PYRENEES, DORDOGNE, AND THE CANTABRIAN MOUNTAINS OF SPAIN

ÉMILE CARTAILHAC
HENRI BREUIL
HUGO OBERMAIER

Page 7

Page 8

PREFACE
This volume is the outcome of an ever-memorable tour through the country
of the men of the Old Stone Age, guided by three of the distinguished
archæologists of France, to whom the work is gratefully dedicated. This
Palæolithic tour[A] of three weeks, accompanied as it was by a constant
flow of conversation and discussion, made a very profound impression,
namely, of the very early evolution of the spirit of man, of the close relation
between early human environment and industry and the development of
mind, of the remote antiquity of the human powers of observation, of
discovery, and of invention. It appears that men with faculties and powers
like our own, but in the infancy of education and tradition, were living in
this region of Europe at least 25,000 years ago. Back of these intelligent
races were others, also of eastern origin but in earlier stages of mental
development, all pointing to the very remote ancestry of man from earlier
mental and physical stages.
Another great impression from this region is that it is the oldest centre of
human habitation of which we have a complete, unbroken record of
continuous residence from a period as remote as 100,000 years
corresponding with the dawn of human culture, to the hamlets of the
modern peasant of France of A. D. 1915. In contrast, Egyptian, Ægean, and
Mesopotamian civilizations appear as of yesterday.
The history of this region and its people has been developed chiefly through
the genius of French archæologists, beginning with Boucher de Perthes. The
more recent discoveries, which have come in rapid and almost bewildering
succession since the foundation of the Institut de Paléontologie humaine,
have been treated in a number of works recently published by some of the
experienced archæologists of England, France, and Germany. I refer
especially to the Prehistoric Times of Lord Avebury, to the Ancient Hunters
of Professor Sollas, to Der Mensch der Vorzeit of Professor Obermaier, and
to Die diluviale Vorzeit Deutschlands of Doctor R. R. Schmidt. Thus, on
receiving the invitation from President Wheeler to lecture upon this subject
before the University of California, I hesitated from the feeling that it would

Page 9

be difficult to say anything which had not been already as well or better
said. On further reflection, however, I accepted the invitation with the
purpose of attempting to give this great subject a more strictly historical or
chronological treatment than it had previously received within the limits of
a popular work in our own language, also to connect the environment, the
animal and human life, and the art.
This element of the time in which the various events occurred can only be
drawn from a great variety of sources, from the simultaneous consideration
of the geography, climate, plants and animals, the mental and bodily
development of the various races, and the industries and arts which reflect
the relations between the mind and the environment. In more technical
terms, I have undertaken in these lectures to make a synthesis of the results
of geology, palæontology, anthropology, and archæology, a correlation of
environmental and of human events in the European Ice Age. Such a
synthesis was begun many years ago in the preparation of my Age of
Mammals, but could not be completed until I had gone over the territory
myself.
The attempt to place this long chapter of prehistory on a historical basis has
many dangers, of which I am fully aware. After weighing the evidence
presented by the eminent authorities in these various branches of science, I
have presented my conclusions in very definite and positive form rather
than in vague or general terms, believing that a positive statement has at
least the merit of being positively supported or rebutted by fresh evidence.
For example, I have placed the famous Piltdown man, Eoanthropus, in a
comparatively recent stage of geologic time, an entirely opposite conclusion
to that reached by Doctor A. Smith Woodward, who has taken a leading part
in the discovery of this famous race and has concurred with other British
geologists in placing it in early Pleistocene times. The difference between
early and late Pleistocene times is not a matter of thousands but of hundreds
of thousands of years; if so advanced a stage as the Piltdown man should
definitely occur in the early Pleistocene, we may well expect to discover
man in the Pliocene; on the contrary, in my opinion even in late Pliocene
times man had only reached a stage similar to the Pithecanthropus, or
prehuman Trinil race of Java; in other words, according to my view, man as
such chiefly evolved during the half million years of the Pleistocene Epoch
and not during the Pliocene.

Page 10

This question is closely related to that of the antiquity of the oldest
implements shaped by the human hand. Here again I have adopted an
opinion opposed by some of the highest authorities, but supported by
others, namely, that the earliest of these undoubted handiworks occur
relatively late in the Pleistocene, namely, about 125,000 years ago. Since
the Piltdown man was found in association with such implements, it is at
once seen that the two questions hang together.
This work represents the co-operation of many specialists on a single, very
complex problem. I am not in any sense an archæologist, and in this
important and highly technical field I have relied chiefly upon the work of
Hugo Obermaier and of Déchelette in the Lower Palæolithic, and of Henri
Breuil in the Upper Palæolithic. Through the courtesy of Doctor Obermaier
I had the privilege of watching the exploration of the wonderful grotto of
Castillo, in northern Spain, which affords a unique and almost complete
sequence of the industries of the entire Old Stone Age. This visit and that to
the cavern of Altamira, with its wonderful frescoed ceiling, were in
themselves a liberal education in the prehistory of man. With the Abbé
Breuil I visited all the old camping stations of Upper Palæolithic times in
Dordogne and noted with wonder and admiration his detection of all the
fine gradations of invention which separate the flint-makers of that period.
With Professor Cartailhac I enjoyed a broad survey of the Lower and Upper
Palæolithic stations and caverns of the Pyrenees region and took note of his
learned and spirited comments. Here also we had the privilege of being with
the party who entered for the first time the cavern of Tuc d'Audoubert, with
the Comte de Bégouen and his sons.
In the American Museum I have been greatly aided by Mr. Nels C. Nelson,
who has reviewed all the archæological notes and greatly assisted me in the
classification of the flint and bone implements which is adopted in this
volume.
In the study of the divisions, duration, and fluctuations of climate during the
Old Stone Age I have been assisted chiefly by Doctor Chester A. Reeds, a
geologist of the American Museum, who devoted two months to bringing
together in a comprehensive and intelligible form the results of the great
researches of Albrecht Penck and Eduard Brückner embraced in the three-
volume work, Die Alpen im Eiszeitalter. The temperatures and snow-levels

Page 11

of the Glacial Epoch, which is contemporaneous with the Old Stone Age,
together with the successive phases of mammalian life which they
conditioned, afford the firm basis of our chronology; that is, we must
reckon the grand divisions of past time in terms of Glacial and Interglacial
Stages; the subdivisions are recorded in terms of the human invention and
progress of the flint industry. I have also had frequent recourse to The Great
Ice Age and the more recent Antiquity of Man in Europe of James Geikie,
the founder of the modern theory of the multiple Ice Age in Europe.
It is a unique pleasure to express my indebtedness to the Upper Palæolithic
artists of the now extinct Crô-Magnon race, from whose work I have sought
to portray so far as possible the mammalian and human life of the Old
Stone Age. While we owe the discovery and early interpretation of this art
to a generation of archæologists, it has remained for the Abbé Breuil not
only to reproduce the art with remarkable fidelity but to firmly establish a
chronology of the stages of art development. These results are brilliantly set
forth in a superb series of volumes published by the Institut de
Paléontologie humaine on the foundation of the Prince of Monaco; in fact,
the memoirs on the art and industry of Grimaldi, Font-de-Gaume, Altamira,
La Pasiega, and the Cantabrian caves of Spain (Les Cavernes de la Région
Cantabrique), representing the combined labors of Capitan, Cartailhac,
Verneau, Boule, Obermaier, and Breuil, mark a new epoch in the prehistory
of man in Europe. There never has been a more fortunate union of genius,
opportunity, and princely support.
In the collection of materials and illustrations from the vast number of
original papers and memoirs consulted in the preparation of this volume, as
well as in the verification of the text and proofs, I have been constantly
aided by one of my research assistants, Miss Christina D. Matthew, who has
greatly facilitated the work. I am indebted also to Miss Mabel R. Percy for
the preparation and final revision of the manuscript. From the bibliography
prepared by Miss Jannette M. Lucas, the reader may find the original
authority for every statement which does not rest on my own observation or
reflection.
Interest in human evolution centres chiefly in the skull and in the brain. The
slope of the forehead and the other angles, which are so important in
forming an estimate of the brain capacity, may be directly compared

Page 12

throughout this volume, because the profile or side view of every skull
figured is placed in exactly the same relative position, namely, on the lines
established by the anatomists of the Frankfort Convention to conform to the
natural pose of the head on the living body.
In anatomy I have especially profited by the co-operation of my former
student and present university colleague Professor J. Howard McGregor, of
Columbia, who has shown great anatomical as well as artistic skill in the
restoration of the heads of the four races of Trinil, Piltdown, Neanderthal,
and Crô-Magnon. The new reconstruction of the Piltdown head is with the
aid of casts sent to me by my friend Doctor A. Smith Woodward, of the
British Museum of Natural History. The problem of reconstruction of the
Piltdown skull has, through the differences of interpretation by Smith
Woodward, Elliot Smith, and Arthur Keith, become one of the causes
célèbres of anthropology. On the placing of the fragments of the skull and
jaws, which have few points of contact, depends the all-important question
of the size of the brain and the character of the profile of the face and jaws.
In Professor McGregor's reconstruction different methods have been used
from those employed by the British anatomists, and advantage has been
taken of an observation of Mr. A. E. Anderson that the single canine tooth
belongs in the upper and not in the lower jaw. In these models, and in all the
restorations of men by Charles R. Knight under my direction, the
controlling principle has been to make the restoration as human as the
anatomical evidence will admit. This principle is based upon the theory for
which I believe very strong grounds may be adduced, that all these races
represent stages of advancing and progressive development; it has seemed
to me, therefore, that in our restorations we should indicate as much
alertness, intelligence, and upward tendency as possible. Such progressive
expression may, in fact, be observed in the faces of the higher anthropoid
apes, such as the chimpanzees and orangs, when in process of education.
No doubt, our ancestors of the early Stone Age were brutal in many
respects, but the representations which have been made chiefly by French
and German artists of men with strong gorilla or chimpanzee characteristics
are, I believe, unwarranted by the anatomical remains and are contrary to
the conception which we must form of beings in the scale of rapidly
ascending intelligence.
Henry Fairfield Osborn.

Page 13

American Museum of Natural History
June 21, 1915.

Page 14

CONTENTS
PAGE

INTRODUCTION
Greek conceptions of man's origin 1
Rise of anthropology 3
Rise of archæolgy 10
Geoligic history of man 18
Geographic changes 34
Climatic changes 37
Migrations of mammals 42

CHAPTER I
Ancestry of the anthropoid apes 49
Pliocene climate, forests, and life 60
Transition to the Pleistocene 62
The first glaciation 64
The First Interglacial Stage 66
Early Pleistocene fauna 69
The Trinil race 73
Eoliths, or primitive flints 84
The second glaciation 86
The Second Interglacial Stage 90
The Heidelberg race 95
Migrations of the reindeer 102
The third glaciation 104

Page 15

CHAPTER II
Date of the Pre-Chellean industry 107
Geography and climate 116
The river-drift stations 119
Pre-Chellean industry 126
The Piltdown race 130
Mammalian life 144
Chellean industry 148
Chellean geography 154
Palæolithic stations of Germany 159
Acheulean industry 161
The use of fire 165
Acheulean industry 166
The second period of arid climate 173
Late Acheulean implements 177
The Neanderthal race of Krapina 181

CHAPTER III
Close of the Third Interglacial 186
The Fourth Glacial Stage 188
Arctic tundra life 190
Environment of the Neanderthal race 196
Mammals hunted by the Neanderthals 202
Cave life 211
The Neanderthal race 214
Mousterian industry 244
Disappearance of the Neanderthals 256

Page 16

CHAPTER IV
Opening of the Upper Palæolithic 260
The Grimaldi race 264
Arrival of the Crô-Magnons 269
Upper Palæolithic cultures 275
Upper Palæolithic races 278
Geography and climate 279
Mammalian life 284
The Crô-Magnon race 289
Burial customs 303
Aurignacian industry 305
The birth of art 315
Origin of the solutrean culture 330
Human fossils 333
The Brünn race 334
Solutrean industry 338
Solutrean art 347

CHAPTER V
Origin of the Magdalenian culture 351
Magdalenian culture 354
Magdalenian climate 360
Mammalian life 364
Human fossils 376
Magdalenian industry 382
Upper Palæolithic art 392
Magdalenian engravings 396
Magdalenian painting 408

Page 17

Art in the caverns 409
Polychrome painting 414
Magdalenian sculpture 427
Extent of the Magdalenian culture 434
Decline of the Magdalenian culture 449
Crô-Magnon descendants 451

CHAPTER VI
Close of the Old Stone Age 456
Invasion of new races 457
Mas d'Azil 459
Fère-en-Tardenois 465
Azilian-Tardenoisian culture 466
Mammalian life 468
Azilian-Tardenoisian industry 470
The burials at Ofnet 475
The new races 479
Ancestry of European races 489
Transition to the Neolithic 493
Neolithic culture 496
Neolithic fauna 498
Prehistoric and historic races of Europe 499
Conclusions 501
APPENDIX
NOTE

I. Lucretius and Bossuet on the early evolution of man 503
II. Horace on the early evolution of man 504
III. Æschylus on the early evolution of man 505

Page 18

IV. 'Urochs' or 'Auerochs' and 'Wisent' 505
V. The Crô-Magnons of the Canary Islands 506
VI. The Length of Postglacial time and the antiquity of the
Aurignacian culture 510
VII. The most recent discoveries of anthropoid apes and supposed
ancestors of man in India 511
VIII. Anthropoid apes discovered by Carthaginian navigators 511

Bibliography 513

Index 533

Page 19

ILLUSTRATIONS
Plate I. Neanderthal man at the grotto of Le Moustier (in
tint) Frontispiece
PAGE

Plate II. Discovery sites of the type specimens of human
and prehuman races (in color) facing 19
Plate III. Pithecanthropus, the ape-man of Java 87
Plate IV. The Piltdown man 145
Plate V. The Neanderthal man of La Chapelle-aux-Saints 203
Plate VI. The 'Old Man of Crô-Magnon' 273
Plate VII. Crô-Magnon artists in the cavern of Font-de-
Gaume (in tint) 358
Plate VIII. Bison painted by Palæolithic artists in the cavern
of Altamira (in color) 414

FIG.

1. Modern, Palæolithic, and chimpanzee skulls
compared 8
2. Skull and brain of Pithecanthropus, the ape-
man of Java 9
3. Three great types of flint implements 11
4. Evolution of the lance-point 15
5. Map—Type stations of Palæolithic cultures 16
6. Section—Terraces of the River Inn near
Scharding 25
7. Section—Terraces of the River Rhine above
Basle 26

Page 20

8. Section—Terraces of the River Thames near
London 28
9. Magdalenian loess station of Aggsbach in
Lower Austria 29
10. Section of the site of the Neanderthal cave 31
11. Sections showing the formation of the typical
limestone cavern 32
12. Map—Europe in the period of maximum
continental elevation 35
13. Section showing snow-lines and sea-levels of
the Glacial Epoch 37
14. Chronological chart—Great events of the
Glacial Epoch 41
15. Zoogeographic map 45
16. The gibbon 50
17. The orang 51
18. The chimpanzee, walking 52
19. The chimpanzee, sitting 53
20. The gorilla 55
21. Median sections of the heads of a young
gorilla and of a man 56
22. Side view of a human brain of high type 57
23. Outlines of typical human and prehuman
brains (side view) 58
24. Outlines of typical human and prehuman
brains (top view) 59
25. Map—Europe during the Second Glacial
Stage 65
26. The musk-ox 66
27. The giant deer (Megaceros) 68
28. The sabre-tooth tiger (Machærodus) 70

Page 21

29. Restoration of Pithecanthropus, the Java ape-
man 73
30. Discovery site of Pithecanthropus 74
31. Section of the volcano of Lawoe and the
valley of the Solo River 75
32. Map—Solo River and discovery site of
Pithecanthropus 75
33. Section of the Pithecanthropus discovery site 76
34. Skull-top of Pithecanthropus, top and side
views 77
35. Head of chimpanzee, front and side views 78
36. Restoration of Pithecanthropus skull, side
view 79
37. Restoration of Pithecanthropus skull, three
views 80
38. Pithecanthropus, the Java ape-man, side view 81
39. Pithecanthropus, the Java ape-man, front
view 82
40. Side view of a human brain of high type 83
41. Outlines of human and prehuman brains, side
and top views 84
42. The hippopotamus and the southern
mammoth 92
43. Merck's rhinoceros and the straight-tusked
elephant 93
44. Map—Geographic distribution of Merck's
rhinoceros, the hippopotamus, and the
straight-tusked elephant 94
45. Section of the Heidelberg discovery site 96
46. The sand-pit at Mauer, discovery site of the
Heidelberg man 97
47. The Heidelberg jaw 98

Page 22

48. Jaws of an Eskimo, of an orang, and of
Heidelberg (side view) 99
49. Jaws of an Eskimo, of an orang, and of
Heidelberg (top view) 100
50. Restoration of Heidelberg man 101
51. Map—Europe during the Third Glacial Stage 105
52. Chronological chart of the last third of the
Glacial Epoch 108
53. Map—Pre-Chellean and Chellean stations 109
54. Map—Europe during the Third Glacial Stage 110
55. Excavation at Chelles-sur-Marne 111
56. Map—Western Europe during the Third
Interglacial Stage 116
57. Three terraces on the Connecticut River 120
58. Four forms of the Chellean coup de poing 121
59. Section—Terraces on the Somme at St.
Acheul 122
60. Very primitive palæoliths from Piltdown 127
61. Pre-Chellean coups de poing from St. Acheul 128
62. Pre-Chellean grattoir or planing tool from St.
Acheul 129
63. Discovery site of the Piltdown skull 131
64. Section of the Piltdown discovery site 133
65. Primitive worked flint found near the
Piltdown skull 134
66. Eoliths found in or near the Piltdown site 135
67. Piltdown skull and skull of South African
Bushman 136
68. Restoration of the Piltdown skull, three views 137
69. Section of the Piltdown skull, showing the
brain 140

Page 23

70. Brain outlines of the Piltdown man, of a
chimpanzee, and of modern man, compared 140
71. The Piltdown man, side view 142
72. The Piltdown man, front view 143
73. Map—Pre-Chellean and Chellean stations 149
74. Section—Middle and high terraces on the
Somme at St. Acheul 150
75. Excavation on the high terrace at St. Acheul 151
76. Small Chellean implements 153
77. Map—Palæolithic stations of Germany 160
78. Entrance to the grotto of Castillo 163
79. Section—archæologic layers of the grotto of
Castillo 164
80. Map—Acheulean stations 167
81. Late Acheulean station of La Micoque in
Dordogne 168
82. Method of 'flaking' flint 169
83. Method of 'chipping' flint 170
84. The fracture of flint 171
85. Large Acheulean implements 173
86. Map—Valleys of the Dordogne and the
Garonne 175
87. The valley of the Vézère 176
88. Acheulean implements, large and small 178
89. A Levallois flake 179
90. The grotto of Krapina 181
91. Section Valley of the Krapinica River and
grotto of Krapina 182
92. Section—The grotto of Krapina 183
93. Skull from Krapina, side view 184

Page 24

94. Map—Europe during the Fourth Glacial
Stage 189
95. The woolly rhinoceros and the woolly
mammoth 190
96. Typical tundra fauna 193
97. Map—Palæolithic stations of Germany 195
98. The type station of Le Moustier 197
99. Excavations at Le Moustier 198
100. The Mousterian cavern of Wildkirchli 200
101. Entrance to the grotto of Sirgenstein 201
102. The woolly mammoth and his hunters 208
103. The woolly rhinoceros 210
104. Map—Distribution of Pre-Neanderthaloids
and Neanderthaloids 214
105. The Gibraltar skull, front view 215
106. Section of the Neanderthal discovery site 216
107. The Neanderthal skull, side view 217
108. The skull known as Spy I, side view 220
109. Discovery site of La Chapelle-aux-Saints 222
110. Entrance to the grotto of La Chapelle-aux-
Saints 223
111. The skull from La Chapelle-aux-Saints, three
views 224
112. Human teeth of Neanderthaloid type from La
Cotte de St. Brelade 225
113. Skulls of a chimpanzee, of La Chapelle-aux-
Saints, and of a modern Frenchman, side
view 227
114. Outlines of the Gibraltar skull and of a
modern Australian skull 228

Page 25

115. Skull of La Chapelle-aux-Saints compared
with one of high modern type, side view 230
116. Skulls of a chimpanzee, of La Chapelle-aux-
Saints, and of a modern Frenchman, top view 231
117. Diagram comparing eleven races of fossil
and living men 233
118. Section of the skull of La Chapelle-aux-
Saints, showing the brain 235
119. Brain outlines of La Chapelle-aux-Saints, of
a chimpanzee, and of modern man, compared 235
120. Brains of Lower and Upper Palæolithic races,
top and side views 236
121. Skeleton of La Chapelle-aux-Saints 238
122. Thigh-bones of the Trinil, Neanderthal, Crô-
Magnon, and modern races 240
123. The Neanderthal man of La Chapelle-aux-
Saints, side view 242
124. The Neanderthal man of La Chapelle-aux-
Saints, front view 243
125. Map—Mousterian stations 245
126. The Mousterian cave of Hornos de la Peña 246
127. Outlook from the cave of Hornos de la Peña 247
128. Typical Mousterian 'points' from Le Moustier 250
129. Mousterian 'points' and scrapers 251
130. Late Mousterian implements 255
131. Entrance to the Grotte du Prince near
Mentone 262
132. Section of the Grotte des Enfants 265
133. The Grimaldi skeletons 267
134. Skull of the Grimaldi youth, front and side
views 268

Page 26

135. Map—Distribution of Upper Palæolithic
human fossils 279
136. Chronological chart of the last third of the
Glacial Epoch 280
137. 'Tectiforms' from Font-de-Gaume 283
138. Map—Distribution of the reindeer,
mammoth, and woolly rhinoceros 285
139. Section of the grotto of Aurignac 290
140. Section of the grotto of Crô-Magnon 291
141. Skull of Crô-Magnon type from the Grotte
des Enfants 292
142. Head showing the method of restoration used
by J. H. McGregor 293
143. The rock shelter of Laugerie Haute,
Dordogne 296
144. Skeleton of La Chapelle-aux-Saints and
skeleton of Crô-Magnon type from the Grotte
des Enfants, compared 297
145. Sections of normal and platycnæmic tibias 298
146. The 'Old Man of Crô-Magnon,' side view 300
147. The 'Old Man of Crô-Magnon,' front view 301
148. Brain outlines of Combe-Capelle, of a
chimpanzee, and of modern man, compared 303
149. Evolution of the burin, early Aurignacian to
late Solutrean 307
150. Typical Aurignacian grattoirs, or scrapers 309
151. Evolution of the Aurignacian 'point' 311
152. Prototypes of the Solutrean 'laurel-leaf point' 312
153. Map—Aurignacian stations 314
154. Outlook from the cavern of Pindal 315
155. Mammoth painted in the cavern of Pindal 316

Page 27

156. Primitive paintings of animals from Font-de-
Gaume 318
157. Woolly rhinoceros painted in the cavern of
Font-de-Gaume 319
158. Carved female figurine from the Grottes de
Grimaldi 321
159. Female figurine in limestone from Willendorf 322
160. Female figurine in soapstone from the
Grottes de Grimaldi 323
161. Superposed engravings of rhinoceros and
mammoth from Le Trilobite 324
162. Silhouettes of hands from Gargas 325
163. The rock shelter of Laussel on the Beune 326
164. Section of the industrial layers at Laussel 327
165. Bas-relief of a woman from Laussel 328
166. Bas-relief of a man from Laussel 329
167. Map—Solutrean stations 331
168. The skull known as Brünn I, discovered at
Brünn, Moravia 335
169. Solutrean 'laurel-leaf points' 339
170. The type station of Solutré 342
171. Excavations at Solutré 343
172. Typical Solutrean implements 346
173. Mammoth sculptured on ivory, from
Předmost, Moravia 349
174. Engraved and painted bison from Niaux 353
175. Decorated sagaies or javelin points of bone 354
176. Horse's head engraved on a fragment of bone,
from Brassempouy 355
177. Painting of a wolf, from Font-de-Gaume 356

Page 28

178. Crude sculpture of the ibex, from Mas d'Azil 357
179. Decorated bâtons de commandement 359
180. Chronological chart of the last third of the
Glacial epoch 362
181. Engraved and painted reindeer from Font-de-
Gaume 365
182. Four types of horse frequent in Upper
Palæolithic times 367
183. Horse of Celtic type, painted on the ceiling of
Altamira 368
184. Four chamois heads engraved on reindeer
horn, from Gourdan 369
185. Typical alpine fauna 371
186. Typical steppe fauna 374
187. Ptarmigan or grouse carved in bone, from
Mas d'Azil 375
188. The rock shelter of Laugerie Basse,
Dordogne 377
189. Human skull-tops cut into bowls, from
Placard 379
190. Male and female skulls of Crô-Magnon type,
from Obercassel 381
191. The type station of La Madeleine 383
192. Magdalenian flint implements 386
193. Magdalenian bone harpoons 387
194. Magdalenian flint blades with denticulated
edge 390
195. Bone needles from Lacave 391
196. Map—Palæolithic art stations of Dordogne,
the Pyrenees, and the Cantabrian Mountains 394

Page 29

197. Primitive engravings of the mammoth from
Combarelles 397
198. Preliminary engraving of painted mammoth
from Font-de-Gaume 397
199. Charging mammoth engraved on ivory, from
La Madeleine 398
200. Human grotesques from Marsoulas, Altamira,
and Combarelles 399
201. Entrance to the cavern of Combarelles,
Dordogne 400
202. Engraved cave-bear, from Combarelles 401
203. Magdalenian stone lamp, from La Mouthe 401
204. Entrance to the cavern of La Pasiega 402
205. Engraved bison from Marsoulas 403
206. Herd of horses engraved on a slab of stone,
from Chaffaud 404
207. Herd of reindeer engraved on an eagle radius,
from La Mairie 405
208. Reindeer and salmon engraved on an antler,
from Lorthet 406
209. Engraved lioness and horses, from Font-de-
Gaume 407
210. Painted horse of Celtic type, from Castillo 408
211. Galloping horse of steppe type, from Font-
de-Gaume 408
212. Entrance to the cavern of Niaux 409
213. Engraved horse with heavy winter coat, from
Niaux 410
214. Professor Emile Cartailhac at the entrance of
Le Portel 411
215. Engraved horse and reindeer, from La Mairie 412

Page 30

216. Engraved reindeer, cave-bear, and two
horses, from La Mairie 413
217. Engraved wild cattle, from La Mairie 413
218. Preliminary etched outline of bison from
Font-de-Gaume 414
219. Entrance to the cavern of Font-de-Gaume 415
220. Map of the cavern of Font-de-Gaume 416
221. Narrow passage known as the 'Rubicon,'
Font-de-Gaume 417
222. Plan showing reindeer and procession of
bison, Font-de-Gaume 419
223. Plan showing preliminary engraving and
painting of the procession of mammoths,
superposed on drawings of bison, reindeer,
and horses 420
224. Example of superposition of paintings, from
Font-de-Gaume 421
225. Entrance to the cavern of Altamira 422
226. Plan of paintings on the ceiling of Altamira 423
227. The ceiling of Altamira 424
228. Painting of female bison lying down, from
Altamira 425
229. Royal stag engraved on the ceiling of
Altamira 426
230. Statuette of a mammoth carved in reindeer
horn, from Bruniquel 427
231. Entrance to the cavern of Tuc d'Audoubert 428
232. Engraved head of a reindeer from Tuc
d'Audoubert 429
233. Two bison, male and female, modelled in
clay, from Tuc d'Audoubert 430
234. Horse carved in high relief, from Cap Blanc 431

Page 31

235. Horse head carved on a reindeer antler, from
Mas d'Azil 432
236. Statuette of horse carved in ivory, from Les
Espelugues 432
237. Woman's head carved in ivory, from
Brassempouy 433
238. Map—Magdalenian stations 435
239. Necklace of marine shells, from Crô-Magnon 437
240. Map—Palæolithic stations of Germany 439
241. Reindeer engraved around a piece of reindeer
antler, from Kesslerloch 441
242. Entrance to the grotto of Kesslerloch 444
243. The rock shelter of Schweizersbild 445
244. The open loess station of Aggsbach 448
245. Saiga antelope carved on a bone dart-
thrower, from Mas d'Azil 449
246. Western entrance to the cavern of Mas d'Azil 460
247. Azilian harpoons of stag horn 462
248. Azilian galets coloriés, or painted pebbles 464
249. Tardenoisian flints 467
250. Map—Azilian-Tardenoisian stations 471
251. Azilian stone implements 473
252. Double-rowed Azilian harpoons of stag horn,
from Oban 474
253. Section—Archæologic layers in the grotto of
Ofnet 476
254. Burial nest of six skulls, from the grotto of
Ofnet 477
255. Brachycephalic and dolichocephalic skulls
from Ofnet 478
256. Broad-headed skull of Grenelle 482

Page 32

257. Entrance to the grotto of Furfooz on the
Lesse 482
258. Section of the grotto of Furfooz 483
259. One of the type skulls of the Furfooz race 483
260. Restoration of the man of Grenelle 484
261. Implements and decorations from
Maglemose 487
262. Ancestry of the Pre-Neolithic races 491
263. Stages in the manufacture of the Neolithic
stone ax 493
264. Stone hatchet from Campigny 494
265. Stone pick from Campigny 494
266. Restoration of the Neolithic man of Spiennes 495
267. Stag hunt, painting from the rock shelter of
Alpera 497
268. Map—Distribution of the types of recent man
in western Europe 499

Map of Palæolithic Tour folded at the end of the volume

MEN OF THE OLD STONE AGE

Page 33

INTRODUCTION
GREEK CONCEPTIONS OF MAN'S
ORIGIN—RISE OF
ANTHROPOLOGY, OF
ARCHÆOLOGY, OF THE
GEOLOGIC HISTORY OF MAN—
TIME DIVISIONS OF THE GLACIAL
EPOCH—GEOGRAPHIC, CLIMATIC,
AND LIFE PERIODS OF THE OLD
STONE AGE
The anticipation of nature by Lucretius[B] in his philosophical poem, De
Rerum Natura, accords in a broad and remarkable way with our present
knowledge of the prehistory of man:

Page 34

"Things throughout proceed
In firm, undevious order, and maintain,
To nature true, their fixt generic stamp.
Yet man's first sons, as o'er the fields they trod,
Reared from the hardy earth, were hardier far;
Strong built with ampler bones, with muscles nerved
Broad and substantial; to the power of heat,
Of cold, of varying viands, and disease,
Each hour superior; the wild lives of beasts
Leading, while many a lustre o'er them rolled.
Nor crooked plough-share knew they, nor to drive,
Deep through the soil, the rich-returning spade;
Nor how the tender seedling to re-plant,
Nor from the fruit-tree prune the withered branch.
· · · · · · · ·
"Nor knew they yet the crackling blaze t'excite,
Or clothe their limbs with furs, or savage hides.
But groves concealed them, woods, and hollow hills;
And, when rude rains, or bitter blasts o'erpowered,
Low bushy shrubs their squalid members wrapped.
· · · · · · · ·
"And in their keen rapidity of hand
And foot confiding, oft the savage train
With missile stones they hunted, or the force
Of clubs enormous; many a tribe they felled,
Yet some in caves shunned, cautious; where, at night,
Thronged they, like bristly swine; their naked limbs
With herbs and leaves entwining. Nought of fear
Urged them to quit the darkness, and recall,
With clamorous cries, the sunshine and the day:
But sound they sunk in deep, oblivious sleep,
Till o'er the mountains blushed the roseate dawn.
· · · · · · · ·
"This ne'er distressed them, but the fear alone
Some ruthless monster might their dreams molest,
The foamy boar, or lion, from their caves
Drive them aghast beneath the midnight shade,

Page 35

g g ,
And seize their leaf-wrought couches for themselves.
· · · · · · · ·
"Yet then scarce more of mortal race than now
Left the sweet lustre of the liquid day.
Some doubtless, oft the prowling monsters gaunt
Grasped in their jaws, abrupt; whence, through the groves,
The woods, the mountains, they vociferous groaned,
Destined thus living to a living tomb.
· · · · · · · ·
"Yet when, at length, rude huts they first devised,
And fires, and garments; and, in union sweet,
Man wedded woman, the pure joys indulged
Of chaste connubial love, and children rose,
The rough barbarians softened. The warm hearth
Their frames so melted they no more could bear,
As erst, th' uncovered skies; the nuptial bed
Broke their wild vigor, and the fond caress
Of prattling children from the bosom chased
Their stern ferocious manners."[C]
This is a picture of many phases in the life of primitive man: his powerful
frame, his ignorance of agriculture, his dependence on the fruits and animal
products of the earth, his discovery of fire and of clothing, his chase of wild
beasts with clubs and missile stones, his repair to caverns, his contests with
the lion and the boar, his invention of rude huts and dwellings, the softening
of his nature through the sweet influence of family life and of children, all
these are veritable stages in our prehistoric development. The influence of
Greek thought is also reflected in the Satires of Horace,[D] and the Greek
conception of the natural history of man, voiced by Æschylus[E] as early as
the fifth century B. C., prevailed widely before the Christian era, when it
gradually gave way to the Mosaic conception of special creation, which
spread all over western Europe.

Rise of Modern Anthropology

Page 36

As the idea of the natural history of man again arose, during the sixteenth
and seventeenth centuries, it came not so much from previous sources as
from the dawning science of comparative anatomy. From the year 1597,
when a Portuguese sailor's account of an animal resembling the chimpanzee
was embodied in Filippo Pigafetta's Description of the Kingdom of the
Congo, the many points of likeness between the anthropoid apes and man
were treated both in satire and caricature and in serious anatomical
comparison as evidence of kinship.
The first French evolutionist, Buffon,[F] observed in 1749: "The first truth
that makes itself apparent on serious study of nature is one that man may
perhaps find humiliating; it is this—that he, too, must take his place in the
ranks of animals, being, as he is, an animal in every material point."
Buffon's convictions were held in check by clerical and official influences,
yet from his study of the orang in 1766 we can entertain no doubt of his
belief that men and apes are descended from common ancestors.
The second French evolutionist, Lamarck,[G] in 1809 boldly proclaimed the
descent of man from the anthropoid apes, pointing out their close
anatomical resemblances combined with inferiority both in bodily and
mental capacity. In the evolution of man Lamarck perceived the great
importance of the erect position, which is only occasionally assumed by the
apes; also that children pass gradually from the quadrumanous to the
upright position, and thus repeat the history of their ancestors. Man's origin
is traced as follows: A race of quadrumanous apes gradually acquires the
upright position in walking, with a corresponding modification of the limbs,
and of the relation of the head and face to the back-bone. Such a race,
having mastered all the other animals, spreads out over the world. It checks
the increase of the races nearest itself and, spreading in all directions,
begins to lead a social life, develops the power of speech and the
communication of ideas. It develops also new requirements, one after
another, which lead to industrial pursuits and to the gradual perfection of its
powers. Eventually this pre-eminent race, having acquired absolute
supremacy, comes to be widely different from even the most perfect of the
lower animals.

Page 37

The period following the latest publication of Lamarck's(1)[H] remarkable
speculations in the year 1822, was distinguished by the earliest discoveries
of the industry of the caveman in southern France in 1828, and in Belgium,
near Liége, in 1833; discoveries which afforded the first scientific proof of
the geologic antiquity of man and laid the foundations of the science of
archæology.
The earliest recognition of an entirely extinct race of men was that which
was called the 'Neanderthal,' found, in 1856, near Düsseldorf, and
immediately recognized by Schaaffhausen(2) as a primitive race of low
cerebral development and of uncommon bodily strength.
Darwin in the Origin of Species,(3) which appeared in 1858, did not discuss
the question of human descent, but indicated the belief that light would be
thrown by his theory on the origin of man and his history.
It appears that Lamarck's doctrine in the Philosophie Zoologique (1809)(4)
made a profound impression on the mind of Lyell, who was the first to treat
the descent of man in a broad way from the standpoint of comparative
anatomy and of geologic age. In his great work of 1863, The Geological
Evidences of the Antiquity of Man, Lyell cited Huxley's estimate of the
Neanderthal skull as more primitive than that of the Australian but of
surprisingly large cranial capacity. He concludes with the notable statement:
"The direct bearing of the ape-like character of the Neanderthal skull on
Lamarck's doctrine of progressive development and transmutation ...
consists in this, that the newly observed deviation from a normal standard
of human structure is not in a casual or random direction, but just what
might have been anticipated if the laws of variation were such as the
transmutationists require. For if we conceive the cranium to be very ancient,
it exemplifies a less advanced stage of progressive development and
improvement."(5)
Lyell followed this by an exhaustive review of all the then existing evidence
in favor of the great geological age of man, considering the 'river-drift,' the
'loess,' and the loam deposits, and the relations of man to the divisions of
the Glacial Epoch. Referring to what is now known as the Lower
Palæolithic of St. Acheul and the Upper Palæolithic of Aurignac, he says
that they were doubtless separated by a vast interval of time, when we

Page 38

consider that the flint implements of St. Acheul belong either to the Post-
Pliocene or early Pleistocene time, or the 'older drift.'
It is singular that in the Descent of Man, published in 1871,(6) eight years
after the appearance of Lyell's great work, Charles Darwin made only
passing mention of the Neanderthal race, as follows: "Nevertheless, it must
be admitted that some skulls of very high antiquity, such as the famous one
at Neanderthal, are well-developed and capacious." It was the relatively
large brain capacity which turned Darwin's attention away from a type
which has furnished most powerful support to his theory of human descent.
In the two hundred pages which Darwin devotes to the descent of man, he
treats especially the evidences presented in comparative anatomy and
comparative psychology, as well as the evidence afforded by the
comparison of the lower and higher races of man. As regards the "birthplace
and antiquity of man,"(7) he observes:
"... In each great region of the world the living mammals are closely related
to the extinct species of the same region. It is therefore probable that Africa
was formerly inhabited by extinct apes closely allied to the gorilla and
chimpanzee; and as these two species are now man's nearest allies, it is
somewhat more probable that our early progenitors lived on the African
continent than elsewhere. But it is useless to speculate on this subject; for
two or three anthropomorphous apes, one the Dryopithecus of Lartet, nearly
as large as a man, and closely allied to Hylobates, existed in Europe during
the Miocene Age; and since so remote a period the earth has certainly
undergone many great revolutions, and there has been ample time for
migration on the largest scale.
"At the period and place, whenever and wherever it was, when man first
lost his hairy covering, he probably inhabited a hot country; a circumstance
favorable for the frugivorous diet on which, judging from analogy, he
subsisted. We are far from knowing how long ago it was when man first
diverged from the catarrhine stock; but it may have occurred at an epoch as
remote as the Eocene Period; for that the higher apes had diverged from the
lower apes as early as the Upper Miocene Period is shown by the existence
of the Dryopithecus."

Page 39

With this speculation of Darwin the reader should compare the state of our
knowledge to-day regarding the descent of man, as presented in the first and
last chapters of this volume.
The most telling argument against the Lamarck-Lyell-Darwin theory was
the absence of those missing links which, theoretically, should be found
connecting Man with the anthropoid apes, for at that time the Neanderthal
race was not recognized as such. Between 1848 and 1914 successive
discoveries have been made of a series of human fossils belonging to
intermediate races: some of these are now recognized as missing links
between the existing human species, Homo sapiens, and the anthropoid
apes; and others as the earliest known forms of Homo sapiens:

Character of
Year Locality Race
Remains
1848 Gibraltar. Well-preserved Neanderthal.
skull.
1856 Neanderthal, near Skullcap, etc. Type of Neanderthal
Düsseldorf. race.
1866 La Naulette, Fragment of lower Neanderthal race.
Belgium. jaw.
1867 Furfooz, Two skulls. Type of Furfooz race.
Belgium.
1868 Crô-Magnon, Three skeletons and Type of Crô-Magnon
Dordogne. fragments of two race.
others.
1887 Spy, Belgium. Two crania and Spy type of
skeletons. Neanderthal race.
1891 Trinil River, Java. Skullcap and femur. Type of
Pithecanthropus race.
1899 Krapina, Austria- Fragments of at least Krapina type of
Hungary. ten individuals. Neanderthal race.
1901 Grimaldi grotto, Two skeletons. Type of Grimaldi
Mentone. race.
1907 Heidelberg. Lower jaw with Type of Homo
teeth. heidelbergensis.

Page 40

1908 La Chapelle, Skeleton. Mousterian type of
Corrèze. Neanderthal race.
1908 Le Moustier, Almost complete Neanderthal.
Dordogne. skeleton, greater
part of
which was in bad
state of preservation.
1909 La Ferrassie I, Fragments of Neanderthal.
Dordogne. skeleton.
1910 La Ferrassie II, Fragments of Neanderthal.
Dordogne. skeleton, female.
1911 La Quina II, Fragments of Neanderthal.
Charente. skeleton, supposed
female.
1911 Piltdown, Sussex. Portions of skull and Type of
jaw. Eoanthropus, the
'dawn man.'
1914 Obercassel, near Two skeletons, male Crô-Magnon.
Bonn, Germany. and female.
In his classic lecture of 1844, On the Form of the Head in Different
Peoples, Anders Retzius laid the foundation of the modern study of the
skull.(8) Referring to his original publication, he says: "In the system of
classification which I devised, I have distinguished just two forms, namely,
the short (round or four-cornered) which I named brachycephalic, and the
long, oval, or dolichocephalic. In the former there is little or no difference
between the length and breadth of the skull; in the latter there is a notable
difference." The expression of this primary distinction between races is
called the cephalic index, and it is determined as follows:
Breadth of skull × 100 ÷ length of skull.
In this sense the primitive men of the Old Stone Age were mostly
'dolichocephalic,' that is, the breadth of the skull was in general less than 75
per cent of the length, as in the existing Australians, Kaffirs, Zulus,
Eskimos, and Fijians. But some of the Palæolithic races were
'mesaticephalic'; that is, the breadth was between 75 per cent and 80 per

Page 41

Fig. 1. Outline of a modern
brachycephalic skull (fine
dots), superposed upon a
dolichocephalic skull
(dashes), superposed upon
a chimpanzee skull (line).
g. glabella or median
prominence between the
eyebrows.
i. inion—external occipital
protuberance.
g-i. glabella-inion line.
Vertical line from g-i to top of
skull indicates the height
of the brain-case.
Modified after Schwalbe.

The cephalic index, however, tells us little of the position of the skull as a
brain-case in the ascending or descending scale, and following the elaborate
systems of skull measurements which were built up by Retzius(9) and Broca,(10)
and based chiefly on the outside characters of the skull, came the modern
system of Schwalbe, which has been devised especially to measure the skull
with reference to the all-important criterion of the size of the different portions
of the brain, and of approximately estimating the cubic capacity of the brain
from the more or less complete measurements of the skull.
Among these measurements are the slope of the forehead, the height of the
median portion of the skullcap, and the ratio between the upper portion of the
cranial chamber and the lower portion. In brief, the seven principal measures
which Schwalbe now employs are chiefly expressions of diameters which
correspond with the number of cubic centimetres occupied by the brain as a
whole.
In this manner Schwalbe(11) confirms Boule's estimates of the variations in the
cubic capacity of the brain in different members of the Neanderthal race as

Page 42

follows:
Neanderthal race —La Chapelle 1620 c.cm.
" " —Neanderthal 1408 "
" " —La Quina 1367 "
" " —Gibraltar 1296 "
Thus the variations between the largest known brain in one member of the
Neanderthal race, the male skull of La Chapelle, and the smallest brain of the
same race, the supposed female skull of Gibraltar, is 324 c.cm., a range similar
to that which we find in the existing species of man (Homo sapiens).

Fig. 2. The skull and brain-
case, showing the low,
retreating forehead,
prominent supraorbital
ridges, and small brain
capacity, of
Pithecanthropus, the java

Page 43

ape-man, as restored by J.
H. McGregor.

As another test for the classification of primitive skulls, we may select the well-
known frontal angle of Broca, as modified by Schwalbe, for measuring the
retreating forehead. The angle is measured by drawing a line along the forehead
upward from the bony ridge between the eyebrows, with a horizontal line
carried from the glabella to the inion at the back of the skull. The various
primitive races are arranged as follows:

PER
CENT
frontal
Homo sapiens, with an average forehead 90
angle
Homo sapiens, with extreme retreating forehead " " 72.3
Homo neanderthalensis, with the least retreating
" " 70
forehead
Homo neanderthalensis, with the most retreating
" " 57.5
forehead
Pithecanthropus erectus (Trinil race) " " 52.5
Highest anthropoid apes " " 56

For instance, this illustrates the fact that in the Trinil race the forehead is
actually lower than in some of the highest anthropoid apes; that in the
Neanderthal race the forehead is more retreating than in any of the existing
human races of Homo sapiens.

Archæology of the Old Stone Age[I]
The proofs of the prehistory of man arose afresh, and from an entirely new
source, in the beginning of the eighteenth century through discoveries in
Germany, by which the Greek anticipations of a stone age were verified. For a
century and a half the great animal life of the diluvial world had aroused the
wonder and speculation of the early naturalists. In 1750 Eccardus(17) of
Braunschweig advanced the first steps toward prehistoric chronology, in

Page 44

expressing the opinion that the human race first lived in a period in which stone
served as the only weapon and tool, and that this was followed by a bronze and
then by an iron period of human culture. As early as 1700 a human skull was
discovered at Cannstatt and was believed to be of a period as ancient as the
mammoth and the cave-bear.[J]
France, favored beyond all other countries by the men of the Old Stone Age,
was destined to become the classic centre of prehistoric archæology. As early as
1740 Mahudel(18) published a treatise upon stone implements and laid the
foundations both of Neolithic and Palæolithic research. By the beginning of the
nineteenth century the problem of fossil man had awakened wide-spread
interest and research. In Buckland's(19) Reliquiæ diluvianæ, published in 1824,
the great mammals of the Old Stone Age are treated as relics of the flood. In
1825 MacEnery explored the cavern of Kent's Hole, near Torquay, finding
human bones and flint flakes associated with the remains of the cave-bear and
cave-hyæna, but the notes of this discovery were not published until 1840,
when Godwin-Austen(20) gave the first description of Kent's Hole. In 1828
Tournal and Christol(21) announced the first discoveries in France (Languedoc)
of the association of human bones with the remains of extinct animals. In 1833-
4 Schmerling(22) described his explorations in the caverns near Liége, in
Belgium, in which he found human bones and rude flint implements
intermingled with the remains of the mammoth, the woolly rhinoceros, the
cave-hyæna, and the cave-bear. This is the first published evidence of the life of
the Cave Period of Europe, and was soon followed by the recognition of similar
cavern deposits along the south coast of Great Britain, in France, Belgium and
Italy.

Page 45

Fig. 3. Three great types of flint implements.
A. An eolith of accidental
shape.
B. A palæolith of Chellean
type, partly fashioned.
C. A Neolithic axe head, partly
polished.
After MacCurdy.

The work of the caveman, gradually revealed between 1828 and 1840, is now
known to belong to the closing period of the Old Stone Age, and it is very
remarkable that the next discovery related to the very dawn of the Old Stone
Age, namely, to the life of the 'river-drift' man of the Lower Palæolithic.
This discovery of what is now known as Chellean and Acheulean industry
came through the explorations of Boucher de Perthes, between 1839 and 1846,
in the valley of the River Somme, which flows through Amiens and Abbeville
and empties into the English Channel half-way between Dieppe and Boulogne.
In 1841 this founder of modern archæology unearthed near Abbeville a single
flint, rudely fashioned into a cutting instrument, buried in river sand and
associated with mammalian remains. This was followed by the collection of

Page 46

many other ancient weapons and implements, and in the year 1846 Boucher de
Perthes published his first work, entitled De l'Industrie primitive, ou des Arts à
leur Origine,(23) in which he announced that he had found human implements
in beds unmistakably belonging to the age of the 'river-drift.' This work and the
succeeding (1857), Antiquités celtiques et antédiluviennes,(24) were received
with great scepticism until confirmed in 1853 by Rigollot's(25) discovery of the
now famous 'river-drift' beds of St. Acheul, near Amiens. In the succeeding
years the epoch-making work of Boucher de Perthes was welcomed and
confirmed by leading British geologists and archæologists, Falconer, Prestwich,
Evans, and others who visited the Somme. Lubbock's(26) article of 1862, on the
Evidence of the Antiquity of Man Afforded by the Physical Structure of the
Somme Valley, pointing out the great geologic age of the river sands and
gravels and of the mammals which they contained, was followed by the
discovery of similar flints in the 'river-drifts' of Suffolk and Kent, England, in
the valley of the Thames near Dartford. Thus came the first positive proofs that
certain types of stone implements were wide-spread geographically, and thus
was afforded the means of comparing the age of one deposit with another.
This led Sir John Lubbock(27) to divide the prehistoric period into four great
epochs, in descending order as follows:
The Iron Age, in which iron had superseded bronze for arms, axes, knives, etc.,
while bronze remained in common use for ornaments.
The Bronze Age, in which bronze was used for arms and cutting instruments of
all kinds.
The later or polished Stone Age, termed by Lubbock the Neolithic Period,
characterized by weapons and instruments made of flint and other kinds of
stone, with no knowledge of any metal excepting gold.
Age of the Drift, termed by Lubbock the Palæolithic Period, characterized by
chipped or flaked implements of flint and other kinds of stone, and by the
presence of the mammoth, the cave-bear, the woolly rhinoceros, and other
extinct animals.
Edouard Lartet, in 1860, began exploring the caverns of the Pyrenees and of
Périgord, first examining the remarkable cavern of Aurignac with its burial
vault, its hearths, its reindeer and mammoth fauna, its spear points of bone and
engravings on bone mingled with a new and distinctive flint culture. This
discovery, published in 1861,(28) led to the full revelation of the hitherto

Page 47

unknown Reindeer and Art Period of the Old Stone Age, now known as the
Upper Palæolithic. As a palæontologist, it was natural for Lartet to propose a
fourfold classification of the 'Reindeer Period,' based upon the supposed
succession of the dominant forms of mammalian life, namely:
(d) Age of the Aurochs or Bison.
(c) Age of the Woolly Mammoth and Rhinoceros.
(b) Age of the Reindeer.
(a) Age of the Cave-Bear.
Lartet, in association with the British archæologist, Christy, explored the now
famous rock shelters and caverns of Dordogne—Laugerie, La Madeleine, Les
Eyzies, and Le Moustier—which one by one yielded a variety of flint and bone
implements, engravings and sculpture on bone and ivory, and a rich extinct
fauna, in which the reindeer and mammoth predominated. The results of this
decade of exploration are recorded in their classic work, Reliquiæ Aquitanicæ.
(29) Lartet, observes Breuil,(30) clearly perceived the level of Aurignac, where
the fauna of the great cave-bear and of the mammoth appears to yield to that of
the reindeer. Above he perceived the stone culture of the Solutrean type in
Laugerie Haute, and of the Magdalenian type in Laugerie Basse. Lartet also
distinguished between the archæological period of St. Acheul (= Lower
Palæolithic) and that of Aurignac (= Upper Palæolithic).
It remained, however, for Gabriel de Mortillet, the first French archæologist to
survey and systematize the development of the flint industry throughout the
entire Palæolithic Period, to recognize that the Magdalenian followed the
Solutrean, and that during the latter stage industry in stone reached its height,
while during the Magdalenian the industry in bone and in wood developed in a
marvelous manner. Mortillet failed to recognize the position of the Aurignacian
and omitted it from his archæological chronology, which was first published in
1869, Essai de classification des cavernes et des stations sous abri, fondée sur
les produits de l'industrie humaine:(31)
(5) Magdalénien,[K] characterized by a number and variety of bone
implements;
(4) Solutréen, leaf-like lance-heads beautifully worked;
(3) Moustérien, flints worked mostly on one side only;

Page 48

(2) Acheuléen, the 'langues de chat' hand-axes of St. Acheul;
(1) Chelléen, bold, primitive, partly worked hand-axes.
Shortly after the Franco-Prussian War, Edouard Piette (b. 1827, d. 1906), who
had held the office of magistrate in various towns in the departments of
Ardennes and Aisne, France, and who was already distinguished for his general
scientific attainments, began to devote himself especially to the evolution of art
in Upper Palæolithic times, and assembled the great collections which are
described and illustrated in his classic work, L'Art pendant l'Age du Renne
(1907).(32) He first established several phases of artistic evolution in the
Magdalenian stage, and only recognized in his later years the station of
Brassempouy, not comprehending that the Aurignacian art which he found
there underlay the Solutrean culture and was separated by a long interval of
time from the most ancient Magdalenian. His distinct contribution to
Palæolithic history is his discovery of the Étage azilien overlying the
Magdalenian in the cavern of Mas d'Azil.

Page 49

Fig. 4. Evolution of the lance-
point, spear, or dart head.
Note the increasing
symmetry and skill in the
flaking and retouch as the
types pass in ascending
order through the
Chellean, Acheulean,
Mousterian, and
Aurignacian, into the
perfected, symmetrical,
double-pointed 'laurel-leaf'
of the Solutrean; and into
the subsequent decline in
the flint industry of the
Magdalenian and Azilian
stages. After de Mortillet,
Obermaier, and Hoernes.

Henri Breuil, a pupil of Piette and of Cartailhac, exploring during the decade,
1902-12, chiefly under the influence of Cartailhac, formed a clear conception
of the whole Upper Palæolithic and its subdivisions, and placed the
Aurignacian definitely at the base of the series.
Thus step by step the culture stages of archæological evolution have been
established and may be summarized with the type stations as follows:
ÉTAGE STATION
Tardenoisien, Fère-en-Tardenois, Aisne.
Azilien, Mas d'Azil, Ariège.
Magdalenien, La Madeleine, près Tursac, Dordogne.
Solutréen, Solutré près Mâcon, Saône-et-Loire.
Aurignacien, Aurignac, Haute-Garonne.
Moustérien, Le Moustier, commune de Peyzac, Dordogne.
Acheuléen, St. Acheul, près Amiens, Somme.
Chelléen, Chelles-sur-Marne, Seine-et-Marne.
Pre-Chelléen

Page 50

(= Mesvinien, Rutot), Mesvin, Mons, Belgique.
These stages, at first regarded as single, have each been subdivided into three
or more substages, as a result of the more refined appreciation of the subtle
advances in Palæolithic invention and technique.

Larger Image

Fig. 5. The type stations of the successive stages of Palæolithic
culture from the Chellean to the Azilian-Tardenoisian.

A new impulse to the study of Palæolithic culture was given in 1895, when E.
Rivière discovered examples of Palæolithic mural art in the cavern of La
Mouthe,(33) thus confirming the original discovery, in 1880, by Marcelino de
Sautuola of the wonderful ceiling frescoes of the cave of Altamira, northern
Spain.(34) This created the opportunity for the establishment by the Prince of
Monaco of the Institut de Paléontologie humaine in 1910, supporting the
combined researches of the Upper Palæolithic culture and art of France and

Page 51

Spain, by Cartailhac, Capitan, Rivière, Boule, Breuil, and Obermaier, and
marking a new epoch in the brilliant history of the archæology of France.
It remained for the prehistory of the borders of the Danube, Rhine, and Neckar
to be brought into harmony with that of France, and this has been accomplished
with extraordinary precision and fulness through the labors of R. R. Schmidt,
begun in 1906, and brought together in his invaluable work, Die diluviale
Vorzeit Deutschlands.(35)
To an earlier and longer epoch belongs the Prepalæolithic or Eolithic stage.
Beginning in 1867 with the supposed discovery by l'Abbé Bourgeois(36) of a
primordial or Prepalæolithic stone culture, much observation and speculation
has been devoted to the Eolithic(37) era and the Eolithic industry, culminating in
the complete chronological system of Rutot, as follows:
LOWER QUATERNARY, OR PLEISTOCENE
Strépyian (= Pre-Chellean, in part).
Mesvinian, culture of Mesvin, near Mons, Belgium (= Pre-
Chellean).
Mafflean, culture of Maffle, near Ath, Hennegau.
Reutelian, culture of Reutel, Ypres, West Flanders.

TERTIARY
Prestian, culture of St. Prest, Eure-et-Loire, Upper Pliocene.
Kentian, culture of the plateau of Kent, Middle Pliocene.
Cantalian, culture of Aurillac, Cantal, Upper Miocene or Lower
Pliocene.
Fagnian, culture of Boncelles, Ardennes, Middle Oligocene.
Only the Mesvinian stage is generally accepted by archæologists, and this
embraces the prototypes of the Lower Palæolithic culture, which among most
French authors are termed Pre-Chellean or Proto-Chellean. The Eolithic
problem has aroused the most animated controversy, in which opinion is

Page 52

divided. A critical consideration of this era, however, falls without the province
of the present work.
SUCCESSION OF HUMAN INDUSTRIES AND CULTURES[L]

V. LATER IRON AGE Europe 500 B. C. to
Roman Times.
(La Tène Culture)
IV. EARLIER IRON AGE 1000-500 B.
Europe
C.
(Hallstatt Culture) Orient 1800-1000
III. BRONZE AGE Europe about 2000-1000
Orient " 4000-1800
II. NEW STONE AGE, NEOLITHIC
3. LATE NEOLITHIC and
COPPER AGE
(Transition Period) Europe " 3000-2000.
2. TYPICAL NEOLITHIC AGE
(Robenhausian, Swiss Lake-
Europe " 7000.
Dwellers)
1. EARLY NEOLITHIC
STAGES
(Campignian Culture) Europe
I. OLD STONE AGE,
PALÆOLITHIC
UPPER PALÆOLITHIC EUROPE
8. Azilian-Tardenoisian. } Reindeer, " 12,000.
7. Magdalenian. (Close of Shelter,
Postglacial time.)
} and " 16,000.

6. Solutrean. } Cave
Period.
5. Aurignacian. (Beginning }
of Post-Glacial Time.) }
LOWER PALÆOLITHIC

Page 53

4. Mousterian. (Fourth
" 40,000.
Glacial time.)
3. Acheulean. (Transition to River-
shelters.) } Drift
2. Chellean. } and " 100,000.
Terrace
1. Pre-Chellean } Period.
(Mesvinian.)
EOLITHIC.

Geologic History of Man
Man emerges from the vast geologic history of the earth in the period known as
the Pleistocene, or Glacial, and Postglacial, the 'Diluvium' of the older
geologists. The men of the Old Stone Age in western Europe are now known
through the latter half of Glacial times to the very end of Postglacial times,
when the Old Stone Age, with its wonderful environment of mammalian and
human life, comes to a gradual close, and the New Stone Age begins with the
climate and natural beauties of the forests, meadows, and Alps of Europe as
they were before the destroying hand of economic civilization fell upon them.

Page 54

Larger Image

Pl. II. "Throughout this long
epoch western Europe is
to be viewed as a
peninsula, surrounded on
all sides by the sea and
stretching westward from
the great land mass of
eastern Europe and of
Asia, which was the chief
theatre of evolution both
of animal and human life."
1-8. Discovery sites of the
type specimens of human
and prehuman races.

It is our difficult but fascinating task to project in our imagination the
extraordinary series of prehistoric natural events which were witnessed by the
successive races of Palæolithic men in Europe; such a combination and
sequence never occurred before in the world's history and will never occur
again. They centred around three distinct and yet closely related groups of

Page 55

causes. First, the formation of the two great ice-fields centring over the
Scandinavian peninsula and over the Alps; second, the arrival or assemblage in
western Europe of mammals from five entirely different life-zones or natural
habitats; third, the arrival in Europe of seven or eight successive races of men
by migration, chiefly from the great Eurasiatic continent of the East.
Throughout this long epoch western Europe is to be viewed as a peninsula,
surrounded on all sides by the sea and stretching westward from the great land
mass of eastern Europe and of Asia, which was the chief theatre of evolution
both of animal and human life. It was the 'far west' of all migrations of animals
and men. Nor may we disregard the vast African land mass, the northern coasts
of which afforded a great southern migration route from Asia, and may have
supplied Europe with certain of its human races such as the 'Grimaldi.'
These three principal phenomena of the ice-fields, the mammals, and the
human life and industry, together establish the chronology of the Age of Man.
In other words, there are four ways of keeping prehistoric time: that of geology,
that of palæontology, that of anatomy, and that of human industry. Geologic
events mark the grander divisions of time; palæontologic and anatomic events
mark the lesser divisions; while the successive phases of human industry mark
the least divisions. The geologic chronology deals with such immense periods
of time that its ratio to the animal and to the human chronology is like that of
years to hours and to minutes of our own solar time.
The Glacial Epoch when first revealed by Charpentier(39) and Agassiz,(40)
between 1837 and 1840, was supposed to correspond to a single great advance
and retreat of the ice-fields from various centres. The vague problem of the
antiquity of Pliocene man and Diluvial man soon merged into the far more
definite chronology of glacial and interglacial man. As early as 1854, Morlot
discovered near Dürnten, on the borders of the lake of Zürich, a bed of fossil
plants indicating a period of south temperate climate intervening between two
great deposits of glacial origin. This led to the new conception of cold glacial
stages and warm interglacial stages, and Morlot(41) himself advanced the theory
that there had been three glacial stages separated by two interglacial stages.
Other discoveries followed both of fossil plants and mammals adapted to
warmer periods intervening between the colder periods. Moreover, successive
glacial moraines and 'drifts,' and successive river 'terraces' were found to
confirm the theory of multiple glacial stages. The British geologist, James
Geikie (1871-94) marshalled all the evidence for the extreme hypothesis of a
succession of six glacial and five interglacial stages, each with its

Page 56

corresponding cold and warm climates. Strong confirmation of a theory of four
great glaciations came through the American geologists, Chamberlin,(42)
Salisbury,(43) and others, in the discovery of evidence of four chief glacial and
three interglacial stages in northern portions of our own continent. Finally, a
firm foundation of the quadruple glacial theory in Europe was laid by the
classic researches of Penck and Brückner(44) in the Alps, which were published
in 1909. Thus the exhaustive research of Geikie, of Chamberlin and Salisbury,
of Penck and Brückner, and finally of Leverett(45) has firmly established eight
subdivisions or stages of Pleistocene time, namely, four glacial, three
interglacial, and one postglacial. These not only mark the great eras of
European time but also make possible the synchrony of America with Europe.
PLACE OF THE OLD STONE AGE IN THE EARTH'S HISTORY
(Indicated in heavy-face letter.)
Compare Schuchert's Table, 1914.

Major Advances in Dominant
Periods and Epochs
Divisions Life Life
HOLOCENE. Recent Rise of world Age of
alluvial. civilization. Man.
...... ...... Industry in Iron,
iron, copper, Bronze,
and and
polished New
stone. Stone
Quaternary.
Ages.
Postglacial Extinction of
Men
stage. great
PLEISTOCENE, of the
mammals.
or Old
Glacial Dawn of
ICE AGE. Stone
stages. mind, art, and
Age.
industry.
Tertiary. Late Transformation Age of
Tertiary. of man-ape Mammals
PLIOCENE.
into and
man. Modern
Plant
Life.

Page 57

Culmination of
MIOCENE.
mammals
Beginnings of
OLIGOCENE. anthropoid ape
life.
Appearance of
higher types of
Early mammals,
EOCENE. Tertiary. and vanishing
of
archaic
forms.
Rise of archaic
PALÆOCENE.
mammals.
Extinction of
great reptiles.
Cretaceous. Extreme
Late specialization
Mesozoic. of reptiles.
Rise of Age
Comanchian. flowering of
plants. Reptiles.
Rise of birds
Jurassic. and flying
Early
reptiles.
Mesozoic.
Rise of
Triassic.
dinosaurs.

Since most of the skeletal and cultural remains of man can now be definitely
attributed to certain glacial, interglacial, or postglacial stages, vast interest
attaches to the very difficult problem of the duration of the whole Ice Age and
the relative duration of its various glacial and interglacial stages. The following
figures set forth the wide variations in opinion on this subject and the two
opposite tendencies of speculation which lead to greatly expanded or greatly
abbreviated estimates of Pleistocene time:
DURATION OF THE ICE AGE

Page 58

1863. Charles Lyell,(46) Principles of Geology 800,000 years.
1874. James D. Dana,(47) Manual of Geology 720,000 "
Charles D. Walcott,(48) Geologic Time as Indicated
1893. 400,000 "
by the Sedimentary Rocks of North America
W. Upham,(49) Estimates of Geologic Times, Amer.
1893. 100,000 "
Jour. Sci., vol. XLV
1894. A. Heim,(50) Ueber das absolute Alter der Eiszeit 100,000 "
1900. W. J. Sollas,(51) Evolutional Geology 400,000 "
520,000-
1909. Albrecht Penck,(52) Die Alpen im Eiszeitalter
840,000
1914. James Geikie,(53) The Antiquity of Man in Europe 620,000 (min.)

We may adopt for the present work the more conservative estimate of Penck,
that since the first great ice-fields developed in Scandinavia, in the Alps, and in
North America west of Hudson Bay a period of time of not less than 520,000
years has elapsed. The relative duration of the subdivisions of the Glacial
Epoch is also studied by Penck in his Chronologie des Eiszeitalters in den
Alpen.(52) These stages are not in any degree rhythmic, or of equal length either
in western Europe or in North America.
The unit of glacial measurement chosen by Penck is the time which has elapsed
since the close of the fourth and last great glaciation; this is known as the Würm
in the Alpine region and as the Wisconsin in America. While more limited than
the ice-caps of the second glaciation, those of the fourth glaciation were still of
vast extent in Europe and in this country, so that an estimate of 20,000 to
34,000 years for the unit of the entire Postglacial stage is not extreme.
Estimating this unit at 25,000 years and accepting Reeds's(54) estimate of the
relative length of time occupied by each of the preceding glacial and
interglacial stages, we reach the following results (compare Fig. 14, p, 41):

Descent
Relative Grand of Alpine
Duration Totals Snow-
Line
Postglacial Time. Units Years Years Meters
(Period of Upper 1 25,000 25,000
Palæolithic culture,

Page 59

Crô-Magnon and Brünn
races)
Glacial Stage (= Würm,
IV.
Wisconsin)
(Close of Lower
Palæolithic culture,
Neanderthal race) 1 25,000 50,000 1,200
3d. Interglacial Stage.
(Opening period of Lower
Palæolithic
culture, Piltdown and
pre-Neanderthaloid
races) 4 100,000 150,000
Glacial Stage (= Riss,
III.
Illinoian). 1 25,000 175,000 1,250
2d. Interglacial Stage
(= Mindel-Riss, 8 200,000 375,000
Yarmouth)
(Period of Heidelberg
race.)
Glacial Stage (= Mindel,
II.
Kansan) 1 25,000 400,000 1,300
1st. Interglacial Stage
(= Günz-Mindel, 3 75,000 475,000
Aftonian)
(Period of
Pithecanthropus or Trinil
race.)
Glacial Stage (= Günz,
I.
Nebraskan) 1 25,000 500,000 1,200

The Postglacial time divisions are dated by three successive advances of the
ice-caps, which broadly correspond with Geikie's fifth and sixth glaciations;
they are known in the Alpine region as the Bühl, Gschnitz, and Daun. These
three waves of cold and humid climate, each accompanied by glacial advances,
finally terminated with the retreat of the snow and ice in the Alpine region, the
same conditions prevailing as with the present climate. The minimum time
estimates of these Postglacial stages and the corresponding periods of human

Page 60

culture, as calculated by Heim,(50) Nüesch,(55) Penck,(52) and many others, are
summarized in the Upper Palæolithic (p. 281).

Geologic and Human Chronology
There are four ways in which the lesser divisions and sequence of human
chronology may be dated through geologic or earth-forming events. First,
through the age of the culture stations or human remains, as indicated by the
'river-drifts' and 'river terraces' in or upon which they occur; second, through
the age of the open 'loess' stations which are found both on the 'older terraces'
and on the plateaus between the river valleys; third, through the age of the
shelters and caverns in which skeletal and cultural remains occur; fourth,
through the age of the 'loam' deposits, which have drifted down on the 'terraces'
from the surrounding meadows and hills. The men of the Old Stone Age were
attracted to these natural camps and dwelling-places both by the abundance of
the raw flint materials from which the palæoliths were fashioned and by the
presence of game.
In more than ninety years of exploration only three skeletal relics of man have
been found in the ancient 'river-drifts'; these are the 'Trinil,' the 'Heidelberg,'
and the 'Piltdown'; in each instance the human remains were buried
accidentally with those of extinct animals, after drifting for some distance in
the river or stream beds. It is only in late Acheulean times that human burial
rites or interments begin and that skeletal remains are found. Owing to the less
perishable nature of flint, relics of the quarries and stations are infinitely more
common; they are found both in the river sands and gravels, in the 'river
terraces,' and in the 'loess' stations of the plateaus and uplands. Thus prehistoric
chronology is based on observations of the geologist, who in turn is greatly
aided by the archæologist, because the evolution stages of each type of
implement are practically the same all over western Europe, with the exception
of unimportant local inventions and variations. In brief, the large divisions of
time are determined by the amount of work done by geologic agencies; the
comparative age of the various camp sites is determined by their geologic
succession, by the mammals and plants which occur in them, and finally by the
cultural type of any industrial remains that may be found.

Times of the 'High' and 'Low' River 'Terraces'

Page 61

The so-called 'terrace' chronology is to be used by the prehistorian with
caution, for it is obvious that the 'terraces' in the different river-valleys of
western Europe were not all formed at the same time; thus the testimony of the
'terraces' is always to be checked off by other evidence.

Larger Image

Fig. 6. Terraces on either side
of the valley of the River
Inn, Scharding, Austria,
formed by sand and gravel
deposits partly covered
with loess. After Brückner.
Ib. Very broad river deposits of
First Glaciation, on the
first erosion level, covered
with the 'Upper Loess' of
the Second Interglacial
Stage.
IIb. Somewhat narrower river
deposits of Second
Glaciation on the second
erosion level.
IIIb. Still narrower river
terraces of the Third
Glaciation on the third
erosion level, covered
with the 'Lower Loess' of

Page 62

the Third Interglacial
Stage.
IVb. Fourth or lowest terrace of
the Fourth Glaciation on
the fourth erosion level.
Va. Erosion terraces, Achen.
VIa. Post-Bühl erosion.
Loess′, 'Upper Loess' of Second
Interglacial. Loess″,
'Lower Loess' of Third
Interglacial.

As to the origin of the sands and gravels which compose the 'terraces' we know
that the glacial stages were periods of the wearing away of vast materials from
the summits and sides of the mountains, which were transported by the rivers to
the valleys and plains. These vast deposits of glacial times spread out over the
very broad surfaces of the pristine river-bottoms, which in many valleys it is
important to note were from 100 to 150 feet above the present levels. The
diminished and contracted streams of interglacial times cut into these ancient
river beds, forming narrower channels into which they transported their own
materials. Thus, as the successive 'river terraces' were formed, a descending
series of steps was created along the sides of the valleys. In many valleys there
are four of these 'terraces,' which may correspond with several glacial stages; in
other valleys there are only three; in others, again, like the valley of the River
Inn which flows past Innsbruck in the Tyrol (Fig. 6), there are five 'terraces,'
while in the valley of the Rhine above Basle there are six, corresponding, it is
believed, with the materials brought down by the four great glaciations and
with the river levels of Postglacial times. In general, therefore, the 'high
terraces' are the oldest ones, that is, they are composed of materials brought
down during the pluvial periods of the First, Second, and Third Glacial Stages,
while the 'lower terraces' and the 'lowest terraces' in the alpine regions are
composed of materials borne by the great rivers of the Fourth Glacial and
Postglacial Stages. In the region around the Alps the 'higher terraces' are
products chiefly of the third glaciation; in the valley of the Rhine they are
visible near Basle. On the upper Rhine the 'low terraces' are products of the

Page 63

fourth glaciation; they cover vast surfaces and contain remains of the woolly
mammoth (E. primigenius), an animal distinctive of Fourth Glacial and
Postglacial times.

Larger Image

Fig. 7. Cross-section through
the terraced Pleistocene
formations of the Rhine
valley above Basle,
Switzerland. After Penck.
Ib. Outwash of the First
Glaciation—Günz—
Deposits on the first
erosion level.
IIb. Outwash of the Second
Glaciation—Mindel—
Deposits on the second
erosion level.
IIIb. Outwash of the Third
Glaciation—Riss—
Deposits on the third
erosion level.
IVb. Outwash of the Fourth
Glaciation—Würm—

Page 64

Deposits on the fourth
erosion level.
Va. Erosion terrace, Achen
oscillation—fifth erosion
level.
VIa. and VIIa. Post-Bühl
erosion—sixth and
seventh erosion levels.
IIIc. Moraine of the Third
Glaciation—Riss.
The section of the Rheinfelder
Hill lies 3 km. west from
the Möliner Field.

More remote from the glacial regions, but equally subject to the inundations of
glacial times are the 'high terraces' along the River Seine, which are ninety feet
above the present level of the river and contain the remains of mammals
characteristic of the First Interglacial Stage, such as the southern elephant (E.
meridionalis), while the 'low terraces' along the Seine are only fifteen feet
above the present level of the river and contain mammals belonging to the
Third Interglacial Stage. Similarly, the 'high terraces' of the River Eure contain
mammals of First Interglacial times, such as the southern elephant (E.
meridionalis) and Steno's horse (E. stenonis); these fossils occur in coarse river
sands and gravels which were deposited by a broad stream that flowed at least
ninety feet above the present waters of the Eure.
The human interest which attaches to these dry facts of geology appears
especially in the valleys of the Somme and the Marne in northern France; here
again we find 'high terraces,' 'middle terraces,' and 'low terraces'; the latter are
still subject to flooding. In the deep gravels upon each of these terraces we find
the first proofs of human residence, for here occur the earliest Pre-Chellean and
Chellean implements associated with the remains of the hippopotamus, of
Merck's rhinoceros, and of the straight-tusked elephant (E. antiquus), together
with mammals which are characteristic both of Second and Third Interglacial
times.

Page 65

This raises a very important distinction, which is often misunderstood; namely,
between the materials composing the original terraces and those subsequently
deposited upon the terraces. It appears to be in the latter that human artifacts
are chiefly, if not exclusively, found.

Times of the Loam Stations
The 'loam' which washes down over the original sand and gravel 'terraces' from
the surrounding hills and meadows is of much later date than the 'terraces'
themselves, and the archæologist in the valley of the Somme as well as in that
of the Thames may well be deceived unless he clearly distinguishes between
the newer deposits of gravels and of loams and the far older gravels and river
sands which compose the original 'terraces.' This is well illustrated by the
observations of Commont on the section of St. Acheul.(56) The loams and brick-
earth are of much more recent age than the original gravels and sands of the
'terraces' which they overlap and conceal; the lowest and oldest 'loam' (limon
fendillé) contains Acheulean flints, while the overlying 'loam' contains
Mousterian flints. Although occurring on the 'higher terraces,' these flints are of
somewhat later date than the primitive Chellean flints which occur in the coarse
gravels and sands that have collected upon the very lowest levels (Fig. 59).
A similar prehistoric inversion doubtless occurs in the 'terraces' of the Thames,
for materials on the 'highest terrace' (Fig. 8) contain Acheulean flints, while
materials on the 'lowest terrace' belong to a much more recent age.

Larger Image

Page 66

Fig. 8. Section—Four terraces
indicated in the valley of
the Thames at Galley Hill,
near London. Site of the
discovery of the 'Galley
Hill Man' in deposits
overlying one of the high
terraces. Site also of
Gray's Thurrock, a deposit
of Third Interglacial times
containing mammals and
flints of Chellean age. A
typical camping station of
'river-drift man.' Drawn by
Dr. C. A. Reeds.

We have no record of a single Palæolithic station found in the true original
sands and gravels of the 'higher terraces' in any part of Europe; only eoliths are
found on the 'high terrace' levels, as at St. Prest.
The earliest palæoliths occur in the gravels on both the 'middle' and 'upper
terraces' of the Somme and the Marne, proving that the gravels were deposited
long subsequent to the cutting of the original terraces. Geikie,(57) moreover, is
of the opinion that the valley of the Somme has remained as it is since early
Pleistocene times, and that even the 'lowest terrace' here was completed at that
period; this is contrary to the view of Commont, who considers that this 'lowest
terrace' belongs to Third Interglacial times; a restudy of the stations along the
Thames may throw light upon this very important difference of opinion.

Times of the 'Loess' Stations
The glacial stages were generally times of relatively great humidity, of heavy
rain and snow fall, of full rivers charged with gravels and sands, and with loam
the finest product of the erosive action of ice upon the rocks. This loam on the
barren wastes left bare by the glaciers or on the river borders and overflow
basins was retransported by the winds and laid down afresh in layers of varying
thickness known as 'loess.' There was no 'loess' formation either in Europe or

Page 67

America during the humid climate of First Interglacial times, but during the
latter part of the Second Interglacial Stage, again toward the close of the Third
Interglacial Stage, and finally during Postglacial times there were periods of
arid climate when the 'loess' was lifted and transported by the prevailing winds
over the 'terraces' and plateaus and even to great heights among the mountain
valleys. As observed by Huntington(58) in his interesting book The Pulse of
Asia, even at the present time there are districts where we find 'loess' dust
filling the entire atmosphere either during the heated months of summer or
during the cold months of winter.

Fig. 9. Magdalenian loess
station of Aggsbach, in
Lower Austria. A quarry
camping station of the
open-plains type. This
typical Postglacial loess
deposit contains flints of
early Magdalenian age.
After Obermaier.

Page 68

In Pleistocene Europe there were at least three warm or cold arid periods,
accompanied in some phases by prevailing westerly winds,(59) in which 'loess'
was widely distributed over northern Germany, covering the 'river terraces,'
plateaus, and uplands bordering the Rhine and the Neckar. These 'loess' periods
can be dated by the fossil remains of mammals which they contain, also by the
stations of the flint quarries in different culture stages. Thus we find late
Acheulean implements in drifts of 'loess' at Villejuif, south of Paris. Among the
most famous stations of late Acheulean times is that of Achenheim, west of
Strasburg, and not far distant is the 'loess' station of Mommenheim, of
Mousterian times; both belong to the period of the fourth glaciation. An
Aurignacian 'loess' station is that of Willendorf, Austria.

Times of the Limestone Shelters and Caverns
Beginning in the late or cold Acheulean period, the Palæolithic hunters
commenced to seek the warm or sheltered side of deepened river-valleys, also
the shelter afforded by overhanging cliffs and the entrances of caverns. It is
quite probable that during the warm season of the year they still repaired to
their open flint quarries along the rivers and on the uplands; in fact, the river
Somme was a favorite resort through Acheulean into Mousterian times.
In general, however, the open rivers and plateaus were abandoned, and all the
regions of limestone rock favorable to the formation of shelter cliffs, grottos,
and caverns were sought out by the early Palæolithic men from Mousterian
times on; and thus from the beginning of the Mousterian to the close of the
Upper Palæolithic their lines of migration and of residence followed the
exposures of the limestones which had been laid down by the sea in bygone
geologic ages from Carboniferous to Cretaceous times. The upper valleys of the
Rhine and Danube traversed the white Jurassic limestones which are again
exposed in a broad band along the foot-hills of the Pyrenees, extending far west
to the Cantabrian Alps of modern Spain. In Dordogne the great horizontal
plateau of Cretaceous limestone had been dissected by branching rivers, such
as the Vézère, to a depth of two hundred feet. Under overhanging cliffs long
rock shelters were formed, such as that of the Magdalenian station at La
Madeleine.

Page 69

Fig. 10. Ideal section of the
bluff overlying the Düssel
River, near Düsseldorf,
showing the mode of
formation of the famous
Neanderthal Cave, where
the original type of the
Neanderthal race was
discovered in 1856. A
typical resort of the 'cave
man.' After Lyell.
c. Entrance of percolating
waters from above.
f. Exit from the grotto.
a-b. Interior of the cavern.

Many caverns were formed, some of them in early Pleistocene times, by water
percolating from above and (Fig. 11) resulting in subterranean streams which
issued at the entrance; this formed the expanded grotto, sometimes a chamber
of vast dimensions, such as the Grotte de Gargas. Outside of this, again, may
be an abri or shelter of overhanging rock. In other cases the rock shelter is
found quite independent of any cave.
Where the glaciers or ice-caps passed over the summits of the hills the
subglacial streams penetrated the limestone of the mountain and formed vast

Page 70

caverns, such as that of Niaux, near the river Ariège. Here a nearly horizontal
cavern was formed, extending half a mile into the heart of the mountain. The
material with which the floors of the caverns are covered is either a fine cave
loam or the insoluble remainder of the limestone forming a brown or gray
clayey substance. The Magdalenian artists produced drawings on these soft
clays and, in rare instances, used them for modelling purposes, as in the Tuc
d'Audoubert. The sands and gravels were also swept in from the streams above
and carried by strong currents along the wall surfaces, smoothing and polishing
the limestone in preparation for the higher forms of Upper Palæolithic
draughtsmanship and painting.

Fig. 11. Formation of the typical limestone cavern. After Gaudry.
V. Vertical section of limestone
cliff showing (S) waters
percolating from above;
(A-O) interior of the
cavern; and (G) grotto
entrance, original exit of
the cavern waters. H.
Horizontal section of the
same cavern showing the
(G) grotto entrance and

Page 71

(A, G, O, B) the
ramifications of the
cavern.

It would appear that the majority of the caverns were formed in pluvial periods
of early glacial times; the formation had been completed, the subterranean
streams had ceased to flow, and the interiors were relatively dry and free from
moisture in Fourth Glacial and Postglacial times, when man first entered them.
There is no evidence, however, that the cavern depths were generally inhabited,
for the obvious reason that there was no exit for the smoke; the old hearths are
invariably found close to or outside of the entrance, the only exception being in
the entrance to the great cavern of Gargas, where there is a natural chimney for
the exit of smoke. There was no cave life, strictly speaking—it was grotto life;
the deep caves and caverns were probably penetrated only by artists and
possibly also by magicians or priests. It is in the abris or shelters in front of the
grottos and in the floors of the caverns that remarkable prehistoric records are
found from late Acheulean times to the very close of the Palæolithic, as in the
wonderful grotto in front of the cave at Castillo, near Santander. Thus, as
Obermaier(60) observes: "In Chellean times primitive man was a care-free
hunter wandering as he chose in the mild and pleasant weather, and even the
colder climate of the arid 'loess' period of the late Acheulean was not sufficient
to overcome his love of the open; he still made his camp on the plains at the
edge of the forest, or in the shelter of some overhanging cliff." Only in rare
instances, as at Castillo, were the Acheulean hearths brought within the
entrance line of the grotto.
DIFFERENCES OF OPINION AS TO THE GEOLOGIC AGE OF THE
PALÆOLITHIC CULTURE STAGES
The right-hand column represents the theory adopted in this volume.

Boule, Breuil,
Penck, 1910
Geologic Time Wiegers, 1913 Obermaier, 1912
Geikie, 1914
Schmidt, 1912
Bronze. Magdalenian.
Postglacial. Magdalenian. Neolithic. Solutrean.
Azilian. Aurignacian.

Page 72

Magdalenian.
Solutrean.
IV. Glacial. Solutrean. Mousterian.
Aurignacian.
Mousterian.
Early
Mousterian.
Cold Acheulean.
Third Interglacial. Mousterian. Mousterian.
Warm "
Chellean.
Pre-Chellean.
III. Glacial. Mousterian. Cold Acheulean.
Warm
Second Acheulean.
Acheulean.
Interglacial. Chellean.
Chellean.
II. Glacial.
Pre-Chellean.
First Interglacial.

Interpretation of these four kinds of evidence as to the antiquity of human
culture in western Europe still leads to widely diverse opinions. On the one
hand, we have the high authority of Penck(61) and Geikie(62) that the Chellean
and Acheulean cultures are as ancient as the second long warm interglacial
period. An extreme exponent of the same theory is Wiegers,(63) who would
carry the Pre-Chellean back even into First Interglacial times. On the other side,
Boule,(64) Schuchardt,(65) Obermaier,(66) Schmidt,(67) and the majority of the
French archæologists place the beginning of the Pre-Chellean culture in Third
Interglacial times.
In favor of the latter theory is the strikingly close succession of the Lower
Palæolithic cultures in the valley of the Somme, followed by an equally close
succession from Acheulean to Magdalenian times, as, for example, in the
station of Castillo. It does not appear possible that a vast interval of time, such
as that of the third glaciation, separated the Chellean from the Mousterian
culture.
On the other hand, in favor of the greater antiquity of the Pre-Chellean and
Chellean cultures may be urged their alleged association in several localities
with very primitive mammals of early Pleistocene type, namely, the Etruscan
rhinoceros, Steno's horse, and the saber-tooth tiger, as witnessed in Spain and in
the deposits of the Champs de Mars, at Abbeville.

Page 73

It is true, moreover, that at points distant from the great ice-fields, like the
valley of the Somme and that of the Marne, we have no other means of
separating glacial from interglacial times than that afforded by the deposition
and erosion of the 'terraces'; in fact, the interpretation of the age of the cultures
may be similar to that applied to the age of the mammalian fauna. There are no
proofs of periods of severe cold in western Europe in any country remote from
the glaciers until the very cold steppe-tundra climate immediately preceding the
fourth glaciation swept the entire land and drove out the last of the African-
Asiatic mammals.

Geographic Changes
The migrations of mammals and of races of men into western Europe from the
Eurasiatic continent on the east and from Africa on the south were favored or
interrupted by the periods of elevation or of subsidence of the coastal borders
of the Ægean, Mediterranean, and North Seas, and also of the Iberian and
British coast-lines. The maximum period of elevation of the coastal borders, as
represented in the accompanying map (Fig. 12), never occurred in all portions
of the continent of Europe at the same time, because there were oscillations
both on the northern and southern coasts of Europe and Africa. The early
Pleistocene, especially the period of the First Interglacial Stage, was one of
elevation remarkable for the broad land bridges which brought the animal life
of Europe, Africa, and Asia together. The Mediterranean coast rose 300 feet.
Land bridges from Africa were formed at Gibraltar and over to the island of
Sicily, so that for the time there was a free migration of mammalian life north
and south. It is to this that western Europe owes the majestic mammals of
Asiatic and African life which dominated the native fauna.

Page 74

Larger Image

Fig. 12. Europe in the period of
maximum continental
elevation, in which the
coast-lines are widely
extended, connecting
Africa and Europe—
including Great Britain
and Ireland—in a single
vast peninsula, and
affording free migration
routes for animal and
human races north and
south, as well as east and
west. The ocean
boundaries are more
remote and the interior
seas are greatly reduced in
area. After Obermaier.

Page 75

In general, the elevation of the continent took place during interglacial, the
subsidence during glacial times, but Great Britain appears to have been almost
continuously elevated and a part of the continent, and was certainly so during
the Third Interglacial, Fourth Glacial, and Postglacial Stages, because there was
a free migration of animal life and of human culture. The Lower Palæolithic
peoples of Pre-Chellean and Chellean times wandered at will from the valley of
the Somme to the not far distant valley of the Thames, interchanging their
weapons and inventions. The close proximity of these stations is well illustrated
in the admirable map (Fig. 56) prepared under the direction of Lord Avebury
(Sir John Lubbock). The relation which elevation and subsidence respectively
bear to the glacial and interglacial stages is believed to be as follows:
Elevation, emergence of the coast-lines from the sea, broad land connections
facilitating migration, retreat of the glaciers, deepening of the river-valleys, and
cutting of terraces. Arid continental climate and deposition of 'loess.'
Subsidence, submergence of the coast-lines and advance of the sea, interruption
of land connections and of migration routes, advance of the glaciers, filling of
the river-valleys with the products of glacial erosion, the sand and gravel
materials of which the 'terraces' are composed, and subglacial erosion of the
loam, from which in arid periods the 'loess' is derived.
Subsidence was the great feature of closing glacial times both in Europe and
America. During the Fourth Glacial and Postglacial Stages the Black and
Caspian Seas and the eastern portion of the Mediterranean were deeply
depressed, while the British Isles were still connected with France, but by a
narrower isthmus than that of early interglacial times. The scattered stations of
Upper Palæolithic culture found in the British Isles include one Aurignacian,
one Solutrean, two Magdalenian, and two Azilian; this shows that travel
communication with the continent continued throughout that period, in all
probability by means of a land connection. In late Neolithic times the English
Channel was formed, Great Britain became isolated from Europe, and Ireland
lost its land connection first with Wales and then with Scotland.

Changes of Climate
Penck(68) estimates the intensity of the cold and of the humidity which
prevailed during the glacial stages by the descent of the snow-line in the Alps,
which in the two periods of greatest glaciation reached from 1,200 m. (3,937

Page 76

ft.) to 1,500 m. (4,921 ft.) below the present snow-level, with the consequent
formation of vast ice-caps hung with glaciers which flowed great distances
down the valleys of the Rhône and of the Rhine and left their moraines at very
distant points. The moraines and drifts of the lesser glaciations, such as the first
and fourth, stand considerably within the boundaries of these outer moraines
and drift fields. On the contrary, the warmer climates of interglacial times are
indicated by the sun-loving plants found at Hötting, along the valley of the Inn,
in the Tyrol, which are proofs of a temperature higher than the present and of
the ascent of the snow-line 300 m. (984 ft.) above the existing snow-level of
the Alps.

Larger Image

Fig. 13. An ideal earth section
from the North Cape
across the Scandinavian
plateau, through the North
Sea, Swiss Alps, Pyrenees,
and Straits of Gibraltar, to
the Atlas Mountains in
northern Africa, along the
line indicated on the map
(Fig. 25, p. 65),
illustrating the sea-level at
the time of the greatest
elevation of the continent
during the Second Glacial
Stage, as compared with

Page 77

the present sea-level; also
the successive lines of
descent of the region of
perpetual snow during the
four great glacial
advances, as compared
with the present snow-
line. From studies by Dr.
C. A. Reeds.

The alternation of the cold climates of the glacial stages with the warm
temperate climates of the interglacial stages formed great oscillations of
temperature (Figs. 13, 14). The fossil plant life indicates that during the periods
of the First, Second, and Third Interglacial Stages the climate of western
Europe was cooler than it had been during the preceding Pliocene Epoch and
somewhat warmer than it is at the present time in the same localities. During
the First, Second, and Third Glacial Stages there was certainly a marked
lowering of temperature in the regions bordering the great glacial fields. This is
indicated by the arrival in the northern glacial border regions of animals and
plants adapted to arctic and subarctic climates.
It has been generally believed that the whole of western Europe was extremely
cold during these glacial stages, and that the heat-loving animals, the southern
elephants, rhinoceroses, and hippopotami, were driven to the south, to return
only with the renewed warmth of the next interglacial stage.
There is, however, no proof of the departure of these supposedly less hardy
mammals nor of the spread over Europe of the more hardy arctic and steppe
types until the advent of the Fourth Glacial Stage. Then, for the first time, all
western Europe north of the Pyrenees experienced a general fall of temperature,
and conditions of climate prevailed such as are now found in the arctic tundra
regions of the north and in the high steppes of central Asia, which are swept by
dry and cold winter winds. Fluctuations of temperature, of moisture, and of
aridity in Pleistocene time, are evidenced not only by the rise and fall of the
snow-line and the advance and retreat of the ice-caps but also by the
appearance of plant and animal life in the periods of the 'loess' deposition,
indicating the following cycles of climatic change as witnessed from beginning
to end of the Third Interglacial Stage:

Page 78

IV. Glacial maximum, cold and moist climate, arctic and cold
steppe fauna and flora.
Cool and dry steppe climate, wide-spread deposition of
'loess.'
Interglacial maximum, a long period of warm temperate
forest and meadow conditions.
Glacial retreat, cool and moist climate bordering the
glacial regions.
III. Glacial maximum, cold and humid climate bordering the
glaciers, favorable to arctic and subarctic plant and animal life.
That great fields of ice and advancing glaciers alone do not constitute proof of
very low temperatures is shown at the present time in southeastern Alaska,
where very heavy snowfall or precipitation causes the accumulation of vast
glaciers, although the mean annual temperature is only 10° Fahr. (5.56° C.)
lower than that of southern Germany. Neumayr(69) estimated that during the Ice
Age there was a general lowering of temperature in Europe of not more than 6°
C. (10.8° Fahr.), and held that even during the glacial advances a comparatively
mild climate prevailed in Great Britain. Martins(70) estimated that a lowering of
the temperature to the extent of 4° C. (7.2° Fahr.) would bring the glaciers of
Chamonix down to the level of the plain of Geneva. Penck estimates that, all
the atmospheric conditions remaining the same as at present, a fall of
temperature to the extent of 4° to 5° C. would be sufficient to bring back the
Glacial Epoch in Europe. These moderate estimates entirely agree with our
theory that animals of African and Asiatic habit flourished in western Europe to
the very close of the Third Interglacial Stage, and that then for the first time the
warm fauna, or faune chaude, gradually disappeared.
Similarly the hypothesis of extremely warm or subtropical conditions
prevailing in interglacial times as far north as Britain, which originated with the
discovery of the northerly distribution of the hippopotami and rhinoceroses,
animals which we now associate with the torrid climate of Africa, is not
supported by the study either of the plant life of interglacial stages or by the
history of the animals themselves. It is quite probable that both the hippopotami
and the rhinoceroses of the 'warm fauna' were protected by hairy covering,
although not by the thick undercoating of wool which protected the woolly

Page 79

rhinoceros and woolly mammoth, animals favoring the borders of glaciers and
flourishing during the last very cold glacial and Postglacial periods.
The combined evidence from all these great events in western Europe leads us
to conclusions somewhat different from those reached by Penck as to the
chronology of human culture. In the chart (Fig. 14) on the opposite page,
prepared by Dr. C. A. Reeds in collaboration with the author, a new correlation
of geologic, climatic, human, industrial, and faunal events is presented. The
great waves of glacial advance and retreat (oblique shading) are based upon
Penck's estimates of the rise and fall of the snow-line (vertical dotted lines) in
the Swiss Alps. (Compare Fig. 13.) The length of these waves corresponds with
the relative duration of the glacial and interglacial stages as estimated by the
varying amounts of erosion and deposition of materials. The entire Palæolithic
or Old Stone Age is thus seen to occupy not more than 125,000 years, or only
the last quarter of the Glacial Epoch, which is estimated as extending over a
period of 525,000 years. The present opinion of the leading archæologists of
France and Germany, which is shared by the author, is that the Pre-Chellean
industry is not older than the Third Interglacial Stage. As the Piltdown man was
found in deposits containing Pre-Chellean implements, he probably lived in the
last quarter of the Glacial Epoch, and not in early Pleistocene times as
estimated by some British geologists. This causes us to regard the Piltdown
remains as more recent than the jaw of Heidelberg, which all authorities agree
is probably of Second Interglacial Age. According to our estimates the
Heidelberg man is nearly twice as ancient as the Piltdown man, while
Pithecanthropus (Trinil Race) is four times as ancient. Yet the Piltdown man
must still be regarded as of very great antiquity, for he is four times as ancient
as the final type of Neanderthal man belonging to the Mousterian industrial
stage. The various archæologic and palæontologic evidences for this general
correlation theory of the Glacial Epoch are fully discussed in the succeeding
chapters of this volume.

Page 80

Larger Image

Fig. 14. Great events of the
Glacial Epoch. To the left
the relation of glacial and
interglacial stages in
Europe and North
America, with the author's
theory regarding the
divisions of time, the
beginning of the Old
Stone Age, and the
successive appearance in
Europe of different
branches of the human
race. To the right the
prolonged warm temperate

Page 81

period in Europe in the
non-glaciated regions,
followed by the relatively
brief cold period during
the past 70,000 years.
Prepared by Dr. C. A.
Reeds, in co-operation
with the author.

Mammals of Five Distinct Geographic Regions
(Compare Color Map, Pl. II, and Fig. 15)
As we have already observed, during the whole history of mammalian life in
various parts of the world never did there prevail conditions so unusual and so
complex as those which surrounded the men of the Old Stone Age in Europe.
The successive races of Palæolithic men in Europe were all flesh eaters,
depending upon the chase. The mammals, first pursued only for food, utensils,
and clothing, finally became subjects of artistic appreciation and endeavor
which resulted in a remarkable æsthetic development.
From the beginning to the end of Palæolithic times the various races of man
witnessed the assemblage in Europe of animals indigenous to every continent
on the globe except South America and Australia and adapted to every climatic
life-zone, from the warm and dry plains of southern Asia and northern Africa to
the temperate forests and meadows of Eurasia; from the heights of the Alps,
Himalayas, Pyrenees, and Altai Mountains to the high, arid, dry steppes of
central Asia with their alternating heat of summer and cold of winter; from the
tundras or barren grounds of Scandinavia, northern Europe, and Siberia to the
mild forests and plains of southern Europe.(71) Members of all these highly
varied groups of animals had been evolving in various parts of the northern
hemisphere from the Eocene Epoch onward. In Pliocene times they had
become thoroughly adapted to their various habitats. Throughout early
Pleistocene times, with the increasing cold extending southward from the arctic
circle, such mammals as the elephant, rhinoceros, musk-ox, and reindeer had
become thoroughly adapted to the climate of the extreme north. There is every
reason to believe that when these tundra quadrupeds first arrived in Europe,

Page 82

during early mid-glacial stages, they had already acquired the heavy coat of
hair and undercoating of wool, such as now characterizes the musk-ox, one of
the living representatives of this northern fauna.
MIGRATIONS AND EXTINCTIONS OF MAMMALIAN LIFE DURING
THE
FOUR GLACIAL, THREE INTERGLACIAL, AND POSTGLACIAL
STAGES

Return of the Alpine
Mammals to the Mountains.
Period of
Recent Wide dispersal of Forest and
Recent
Prehistoric. Meadow Mammals
Animals.
over the Northern
Hemisphere.
Retreat of the Tundra and
Steppe Mammals to the
North and East.
Mingling in the lowlands of
France and Germany of Reindeer
the Reindeer-Mammoth Period
Postglacial. fauna, the Alpine fauna, in
Severe climate. the Steppe Mammals, and Western
the hardy Eurasiatic Europe.
Forest and Meadow
Mammals.
Arrival of the Tundra
Mammals from the North.
IV. Glacial.
Arrival of the Steppe
Cold Steppe climate.
Mammals from Western
Asia.
Southward migration and
extinction of all the
African-Asiatic Mammals
except the lions and
hyænas.
3d Interglacial. Mingled African-Asiatic and Period
Warm climate. Eurasiatic Mammals in of the
different parts of the non- Hippopotamus,

Page 83

glaciated regions, the Rhinoceros,
hippopotamus, southern and
mammoth, straight-tusked Elephant.
elephant, Merck's broad- Also
nosed rhinoceros, lion, of the
hyæna, jackal, sabre-tooth Stag
tiger. and
Reindeer and Woolly Bison
Mammoth in North in
III. Glacial. Western
Germany and the
Alps. Europe.
Also the stag, giant deer,
bison, wild cattle, forest
2d
horse, boar, wolf, fox,
Interglacial.
lynx, wildcat,
several species of bear.
Reindeer and Woolly
II. Glacial. Mammoth in
Northern Germany.
1st Survival of many Pliocene
Interglacial. African-Asiatic Mammals,
mingled with Pliocene
Musk-ox in and recent Eurasiatic
I. Glacial. Sussex, Forest and Meadow
England. Mammals.
'Warm' Three
More hardy
Early African- Chief
Eurasiatic
Migrations Asiatic Life
Mammals.
of Mammals. Periods.
Geologic
Scandinavian Temperate
and
and North and Cool
Climatic
Siberian sheltered temperate
Stages.
Mammals parts forests
near the of and
Ice-fields. Western meadows.
Europe.
Regions near More Sheltered Non-
the Glaciated Regions

Page 84

Ice-fields Remote from the Glacial
and Borders and
Glacial Ice-fields.
Borders.

The five great sources of mammalian migration into western Europe in
Pleistocene times were accordingly as follows:
1. Warm plains of northern Africa and of southern Asia. "African-
Asiatic" fauna—hippopotamus, rhinoceros, elephant.
2. Temperate meadows and forests of Europe and Asia.
"Eurasiatic" fauna—deer, bison, horse.
3. High, cool mountain ranges—Alps, Pyrenees, Caucasus, Urals.
Fauna—chamois, ibex, ptarmigan. (See Fig. 185.)
4. Steppes and deserts. Dry, elevated plateaus and steppes of
eastern Europe and central Asia. Fauna—desert ass and horse, saiga
antelope, jerboa. (See Fig. 186.)
5. Tundras and barren grounds within or near the arctic circle.
Fauna—reindeer, musk-ox, arctic fox. (See Figs. 95 and 96.)
(Compare Figs. 14 and 15.)
In the warm plains, forests, and rivers of southern Asia and northern Africa
there developed the elephants, rhinoceroses, hippopotami, lions, hyænas, and
jackals, which, taken together, may be known as the African-Asiatic fauna. It
contains altogether fourteen species of mammals. The great geographic area
from the far east to the far west over which ranged similar or identical species
of these pachyderms and carnivores is indicated by the oblique lines in the
geographic chart (Fig. 15).
The north temperate belt of Asia and Europe, with its hardy forests and genial
meadows, was the home of the even more highly varied Eurasiatic Forest and
Meadow fauna. This includes twenty-six or more species. Of these the red deer,
or stag, was most characteristic of the forests and the bison and wild cattle[M] of
the meadows. Even at the very beginning of Pleistocene times there appear the
stag, the wild boar, and the roe-deer with their natural pursuers, the wolf and
the brown bear. From the northern woods came the moose and the wolverene.
Most of these mammals were so similar to existing forms that the older

Page 85

naturalists placed them in existing species, but the tendency now is to separate
them or place them in distinct subspecies. Mingled with these forest and
meadow mammals were a few others which have since become extinct, such as
the giant deer (Megaceros), the giant beaver (Trogontherium), and the primitive
forest and meadow horses. From this region also there developed the cave-bear
(Ursus spelæus). Certainly it is astonishing to find the remains of these
mammals mingled with those from southern Asia and Africa, as is frequently
the case. In early glacial times the bison and wild cattle mingled freely with the
hippopotami and rhinoceroses, but in late glacial and Postglacial times they
occurred as companions of the mammoth and the woolly rhinoceros. In
prehistoric times they survived with the mammals brought from the Orient by
the Neolithic agriculturists.

Larger Image

Fig. 15. Zoogeographic map.
Range of the large
mammals of Africa and
southern Asia in Pliocene

Page 86

and Pleistocene times until
nearly the close of the
Lower Palæolithic
(oblique lines). Range of
the forest and meadow
fauna of Europe and Asia
from early Pleistocene to
prehistoric times; stag and
bison fauna (horizontal
lines). Present range of the
tundra or barren-ground
mammals (dots) which
wandered south during the
fourth glaciation,
expelling the large Asiatic
mammals. Present range
of mammals of the deserts
and steppes of eastern
Europe and southern Asia,
which also invaded
western Europe during the
glacial and Postglacial
stages (vertical lines). The
alpine mammals dwelt in
the high mountain regions
and invaded the plains and
lowlands during Fourth
Glacial and Postglacial
times.

During a great glaciation, but especially during the severe climate of late
Pleistocene times, the Alpine mammals were driven down from the heights into
the plains and among the lower mountains and foot-hills. Thus the ibex,
chamois, and argali sheep from the Altai Mountains are represented both in
drawing and in sculpture by the men of the Reindeer Period.
Still more remarkable is the arrival in Europe of the Steppe Fauna of Russia
and of western Siberia, mammals which now survive in the vast Kirghiz

Page 87

steppes, east of the Caspian Sea and the Ural Mountains, where the climate is
one of hot, dry summers and prolonged cold winters, with sweeping dust and
snow storms. These animals are very hardy, alert, and swift of foot, such as the
jerboa, the saiga antelope, the wild asses, and the wild horses, including the
Przewalski type, which still survives in the desert of Gobi. From this region
also came the Elasmothere (E. sibiricum), with its single giant horn above the
eyes. Very distinctive of the fauna frequenting the caverns are the small
rodents, including the dwarf pikas, the steppe hamsters, and the lemmings.
These animals were attracted into Europe during the 'steppe' and 'loess' periods
of cold, dry climate.
The advance of the great Scandinavian glaciers from the north crowded to the
south the Tundra or Barren Ground fauna of the arctic circle. The herald of this
fauna during the First Glacial Stage was the musk-ox, which appears in Sussex,
and then came the reindeer of the existing Scandinavian type. These animals
are followed by the woolly mammoth (E. primigenius) and the woolly
rhinoceros (D. antiquitatis) with their panoply of hair and wool which had long
been developing in the north. Finally in the Fourth Glacial Stage arrived the
lemming of the river Obi, also the more northern banded lemming, the arctic
fox, the wolverene, and the ermine, as well as the arctic hare. These tundra
mammals for a short period mingled in places with survivors of the African-
Asiatic fauna, such as Merck's rhinoceros and the straight-tusked elephant (E.
antiquus). In general, they swept southward as far as the Pyrenees over country
which had long been enjoyed by the African-Asiatic mammals, while the
hippopotami and the southern elephants retreated still farther south and became
extinct.
The only survivors of the great African-Asiatic fauna in Fourth Glacial and
Postglacial times were the hyænas (H. crocuta spelæa) and the lions (Felis leo
spelæa). The lion frequently appears in the drawings of the cavemen.
The various species belonging to these five great faunæ apparently succeed
each other, and wherever their remains are mingled with the palæoliths, as
along the rivers Somme, Marne, and Thames, or in the hearths of the shelters
and caverns, they become of extreme interest both in their bearing on the
chronology of man and on the development of human culture, art, and industry.
They also tell the story of the sequence of climatic conditions both in the
regions bordering the glaciers and in the more temperate regions remote from
the ice-caps. Thus they guide the anthropologist over the difficult gaps where

Page 88

the geologic record is limited or undecipherable. The general succession of
these great faunæ is illustrated in Fig. 14 and also in the above table.

(1) Lamarck, 1815.1.
(2) Schaaffhausen, 1858.1.
(3) Darwin, C., 1909.2.
(4) Lamarck, 1809.1.
(5) Lyell, 1863.1, pp. 84-89.
(6) Darwin, C., 1871.1, p. 146.
(7) Darwin, C., 1909.1, p. 158.
(8) Retzius, A., 1864.1, p. 27.
(9) Op. cit., p. 166.
(10) Broca, 1875.1.
(11) Schwalbe, G., 1914.1, p. 592.
(12) Cartailhac, 1903.1.
(13) Déchelette, 1908.1, vol. I.
(14) Reinach, S., 1889.1.
(15) Schmidt, 1912.1.
(16) Avebury, 1913.1.
(17) Eccardus, 1750.1.
(18) Mahudel, 1740.1.
(19) Buckland, 1824.1.
(20) Godwin-Austen, 1840.1.

Page 89

(21) Christol, 1820.1.
(22) Schmerling, 1833.1.
(23) Boucher de Perthes, 1846.1.
(24) Op. cit.
(25) Rigollot, 1854.1.
(26) Lubbock, 1862.1.
(27) Avebury, 1913.1, pp. 2, 3.
(28) Lartet, 1861.1.
(29) Lartet, 1875.1.
(30) Breuil, 1912.7, p. 165.
(31) de Mortillet, 1869.1.
(32) Piette, E., 1907.1.
(33) Rivière 1897.1.
(34) de Sautuola, 1880.1.
(35) Schmidt, 1912.1.
(36) Bourgeois, 1867.1.
(37) Schmidt, op. cit., p. 5.
(38) Obermaier, 1912.1, pp. 170-174; 316-320; 332, 545.
(39) Charpentier, 1841.1.
(40) Agassiz, 1837.1; 1840.1; 1840.2.
(41) Morlot, 1854.1.
(42) Chamberlin, 1895.1; 1905.1, vol. III, chap. XIX, pp. 327-516.
(43) Salisbury, 1905.1.
(44) Penck, 1909.1.

Page 90

(45) Leverett, 1910.1.
(46) Lyell, 1867.1, vol. I, pp. 293-301; 1877.1, vol. I, p. 287.
(47) Dana, 1875.1, p. 591.
(48) Walcott, 1893.1.
(49) Upham, 1893.1, p. 217.
(50) Heim, 1894.1.
(51) Sollas, 1900.1.
(52) Penck, 1909.1, vol. III, pp. 1153-1176.
(53) Geikie, 1914.1, p. 302.
(54) Reeds, 1915.1.
(55) Nüesch, 1902.1.
(56) Geikie, op. cit., pp. 111-114.
(57) Op. cit., p. 108.
(58) Huntington, 1907.1.
(59) Leverett, 1910.1.
(60) Obermaier, 1912.1, p. 132.
(61) Penck, 1908.1; 1909.1.
(62) Geikie, 1914.1, p. 312.
(63) Wiegers, 1913.1.
(64) Boule, 1888.1.
(65) Schuchardt, 1913.1, p. 144.
(66) Obermaier, 1909.2; 1912.1.
(67) Schmidt, 1912.1, p. 266.
(68) Penck, 1909.1, vol. III, p. 1168, Fig. 136.

Page 91

(69) Neumayr, 1890.1, vol. II, p. 621.
(70) Martins, 1847.1, pp. 941, 942.
(71) Osborn, 1910.1, pp. 386-427.

Page 92

CHAPTER I
ANCESTRY OF THE ANTHROPOID APES
—PLIOCENE CLIMATE, FORESTS,
AND LIFE OF WESTERN EUROPE—
TRANSITION TO THE PLEISTOCENE,
OR AGE OF MAN—THE FIRST
GLACIATION, ITS EFFECTS ON
CLIMATE, FORESTS, AND ANIMAL
LIFE—THE PREHUMAN TRINIL
RACE OF JAVA—THE EOLITHS OR
PRIMITIVE FLINTS—THE SECOND
GLACIATION—THE HEIDELBERG,
EARLIEST KNOWN HUMAN RACE—
THE THIRD GLACIATION
The partly known ancestors of the anthropoid apes and the unknown ancestors
of man probably originated among the forests and flood-plains of southern Asia
and early began to migrate westward into northern Africa and western Europe.
As early as Oligocene times a forerunner of the great apes (Propliopithecus),
most nearly resembling the gibbons, appears in the desert bordering the Fayum
in northern Egypt. Early in Miocene times true tree-living gibbons found their
way into Europe and continued throughout the Pliocene in the forms known as
Pliopithecus and Pliohylobates, the latter being a true gibbon in its proportions;
it ranged northward into the present region of Germany. Another ape which
early reached Europe is the Dryopithecus; it is found in Miocene times in
southern France; the grinding-teeth suggest those of the orang, the jaw is deep
and in some ways resembles that of the Piltdown man. A third ape
(Neopithecus) occurs in the Lower Pliocene near Eppelsheim, in Germany, and
is known only from a single lower molar tooth, which recalls the dentition of
Dryopithecus and more remotely that of Homo. In the Pliocene of the Siwalik
hills of Asia is found Palæopithecus, a generalized form which is believed to be
related to the chimpanzee, the gorilla, and the gibbon; the upper premolars
resemble those of man.

Page 93

None of these fossil anthropoids either of Europe or of Asia can be regarded as
ancestral to man, although both Neopithecus and Dryopithecus have been
placed in or near the line of human ancestry by such high authorities as Branco
and Gaudry. When Dryopithecus was first discovered by Lartet, Gaudry(1)
considered it to be by far the most manlike of all the apes, even attributing to it
sufficient intelligence for the working of flints, but fuller knowledge of this
animal has shown that some of the living anthropoids are more manlike than
Dryopithecus. This animal is closely related to the ancestral stock of the
chimpanzee, gorilla, and orang. The jaw, it is true, resembles that of the
Piltdown man (Eoanthropus), but the grinding-teeth are much more primitive
and there is little reason to think that it is ancestral to any human type.[N]

Fig. 16. The gibbon is primitive
in its skull and dentition,
but extremely specialized
in the adaptation of its
limbs to arboreal life.

Page 94

Photograph from the New
York Zoological Park.

Among these fossil anthropoids, as well as among the four living forms, we
discover no evidence of direct relationship to man but very strong evidence of
descent from the same ancestral stock. These proofs of common ancestry,
which have already been observed in the existing races of man, become far
more conspicuous in the ancient Palæolithic races; in fact, we cannot interpret
the anatomy of the men of the Old Stone Age without a survey of the principal
characters of the existing anthropoid apes, the gibbon, the orang, the
chimpanzee, and the gorilla.

Fig. 17. The orang has a high rounded skull and long face.
Photograph from the New York Zoological Park.

The gibbon is the most primitive of living apes in its skull and dentition, but the
most specialized in the length of its arms and its other extreme adaptations to
arboreal life. As in the other anthropoids, the face is abbreviated, the narial

Page 95

region is narrow, i. e., catarrhine, and the brain-case is widened, but the top of
the skull is smooth, and the forehead lacks the prominent ridges above the
orbits; thus the profile of the skull of the gibbon (Fig. 16) is more human than
that of the other anthropoid apes. When on the ground the gibbon walks erect
and is thus afforded the free use of its arms and independent movements of its
fingers. In the brain there is a striking development of the centres of sight,
touch, and hearing. It is these characteristics of the modern gibbon which
preserve with relatively slight changes the type of the original ancestor of man,
as noted by Elliot Smith.(2)

Fig. 18. The chimpanzee. This
figure illustrates the
walking powers of the
chimpanzee, the great
length of the arms, and the
abbreviation of the legs.

Page 96

Photograph from the New
York Zoological Park.

The limbs of the orang are less elongated and less extremely specialized for
arboreal life than those of the gibbon but more so than those of the chimpanzee
and the gorilla. The skull is rounded and of great vertical height, with broad,
bony ridges above the orbits and a great median crest on top of the skull in old
males. The lower jaw of the orang is stout and deep, and, although used as a
fighting weapon, the canine tusks are much less prominent than in either the
gibbon, chimpanzee, or gorilla. Of all anthropoids this jaw most nearly
resembles that of the Piltdown man.

Fig. 19. The Chimpanzee. This
figure shows certain facial
characteristics which are
preserved in the

Page 97

Neanderthal race of men.
Note also the shortening
of the thumb and the
enlargement of the big toe.
Photograph from the New
York Zoological Park.

In the chimpanzee we observe the very prominent bony ridges above the eyes,
like those in the Trinil and Neanderthal races of men. The prognathous or
protruding tooth rows and receding chin suggest those in the Heidelberg,
Piltdown, and Neanderthal races. When the chimpanzee is walking (Fig. 18) the
arms reach down below the level of the knees, whereas in the higher races of
man they reach only half-way down the thighs. Thus, the fore limb, although
much shorter than that of the gibbon, is relatively longer than that of any
human race, recent or ancient. We observe also in the walking chimpanzee (Fig.
18) that the upper part of the leg, the thigh-bone, or femur, is relatively long,
while the lower part, the shin-bone, or tibia, is relatively short. Indeed, both in
the arm and in the leg the upper bones are relatively long and the lower bones
are relatively short. These proportions, which are inheritances of arboreal life,
are in very marked contrast to those observed in the arms and legs of the
Neanderthal race of men, in which the limbs are of the terrestrial or walking
type.

ANCESTRAL TREE OF THE ANTHROPOID APES AND OF MAN

Page 98

Larger Image

From the unknown and
ancestral stock of the
anthropoid apes and man
the gibbon was the first to
branch off in Oligocene
times; the orang then
branched off in a widely
different direction. The
stem of the chimpanzee
and of the gorilla
branched off at a more
recent date and is more
nearly allied to that of
man. Five early human
races have been found in

Page 99

Europe in Glacial or
Pleistocene times, but no
traces of other primates
except the macaques,
which are related to the
lower division of the
baboons, have been found
in Europe in Pleistocene
times. Modified after
Gregory. (For latest
discovery see Appendix,
Note VII.)

Fig. 20. The Gorilla. An
immature female, about
three years of age,
showing none of the adult

Page 100

male characteristics.
Photograph from the New
York Zoological Park.

We observe also in the chimpanzee a contrast between the grasping power of
the big toe, which is a kind of thumb, and the lack of that power in the hand, in
which the thumb is nearly useless; in all apes this function is characteristic of
the foot, in man of the hand alone. The opposable thumb, with its power of
bringing the thumb against each of the fingers, is the one character which is
lacking in every one of the anthropoid apes and which was early developed
among the ancestors of man.
The skull of the chimpanzee is longer than that of the orang, the most
prominent feature in the top view being the extreme protuberance of the orbits,
which are surrounded by a supraorbital and circumorbital bony ridge, which is
also strongly developed in the Neanderthal skull as well as in the
Pithecanthropus or Trinil skull but, so far as we know, is entirely lacking in that
of Piltdown. As in the orang and the gorilla, a crest develops along the middle
of the top of the skull for the insertion of the powerful muscles of the jaws, a
crest which is wholly wanting in the gibbon and probably wanting in all the
true ancestors of man.

Page 101

Fig. 21. Contrast of the
projecting face
(prognathism), retreating
forehead, and small brain-
case of a young gorilla, as
compared with the vertical
face, prominent nose, high
forehead, and large brain-
case of a high race of man.
After Klaatsch.

The gorilla illustrates in the extreme the specializations which are begun in the
chimpanzee, and which are attributable to a life partly arboreal, partly
terrestrial, with the skull and jaws used as powerful fighting organs. The head is
lengthened by the forward growth of the muzzle into an extreme prognathism.
The limbs and body of the gorilla show a departure from the primitive, slender-
limbed, arboreal type of apes and are partly adapted to a bipedal, ground-
dwelling habit.
As regards psychic evolution,(3) Elliot Smith observes that the arboreal mode of
life of the early ancestors of man developed quick, alert, and agile movements
which stimulated the progressive development of the posterior and lateral
portions of the brain. The sense of smell had been well developed in a previous
terrestrial life, but once these creatures left the earth and took to the trees,
guidance by the olfactory sense was less essential, for life amidst the branches
of the trees is most favorable to the high development of the senses of vision,
touch, and hearing. Moreover, it demands an agility and quickness of
movement that necessitate efficient motor centres in the brain to co-ordinate
and control such actions as tree life calls for. The specialization of sight
awakens curiosity to examine objects with greater minuteness and guides the
hands to more precise and skilled movements.

Page 102

Fig. 22. Side view of a human
brain of high type,
showing the chief areas of
muscular control and of
the sensory impressions of
sight and hearing, also the
prefrontal area in which
the higher mental faculties
are centred. Modified after
M. Allen Starr.

The anatomy of man is full of remote reminders of this original arboreal
existence, which also explains the very large and early development of the
posterior portions of the brain, in which the various senses of sight, touch, and
hearing are located.
The first advance from arboreal to terrestrial life is marked by the power of
walking more or less erect on the hind limbs and thus releasing the arms; this
power is developed to a greater or less degree in all the anthropoid apes; with
practice they become expert walkers. The additional freedom which the erect
attitude gives to the arms and to the movements of the hands and the separate
movements of the fingers is especially noticeable in the gibbon. The cultivation

Page 103

of the powers of the hand reacts upon the further growth and specialization of
the brain; thus the brain and the erect attitude react upon each other. In the
gibbon there is a marked increase in the size of those portions of the brain
which supply the centres of touch, vision, and hearing.

Fig. 23. The evolution of the
brain. Outlines (side view)
of typical human and
prehuman brains, showing
the early development of
the posterior portions of
the brain and the relatively
late development of the
anterior portions, the seat
of the higher mental
faculties.

Discussion as to how the ancestors of man were fashioned has chiefly dealt
with the rival claims of four lines of structural evolution: first, the assumption

Page 104

of the erect attitude; second, the development of the opposable thumb; third,
the growth of the brain; and fourth, the acquisition of the power of speech. The
argument for the erect attitude suggested by Lamarck, and ably put by Munro(4)
in 1893, indicates that the cultivation of skill with the hands and fingers lies at
the root of man's mental supremacy. Elliot Smith's argument that the steady
growth and specialization of the brain itself has been the chief factor in leading
the ancestors of man step by step upward indicates that such an advance as the
erect attitude was brought about because the brain had made possible the
skilled movements of the hands.

Fig. 24. The evolution of the
brain. Outlines (top view)
of typical human and
prehuman brains, showing
the narrow forebrain of the
primitive type and the
successive expansion of

Page 105

the seat of the higher
mental faculties in the
successive races.

The true conception of prehuman evolution, which occurred during Miocene
and Pliocene times, is rather that of the coincident development of these four
distinctively human powers. It appears from the limb proportions in the
Neanderthal race that the partly erect attitude and walking gait were assumed
much earlier in geologic time than we formerly imagined. The intimate relation
between the use of the opposable thumb and the development of the higher
mental faculties of man is sustained to-day by the discovery that one of the best
methods of developing the mind of the child is to insist upon the constant use
of the hands, for the action and reaction between hand and brain is found to
develop the mind. A similar action and reaction between foot and brain
developed the erect gait which released the hand from its locomotive and limb-
grasping function, and by the resultant perfecting of the motion of thumbs and
fingers turned the hand into an organ ready for the increasing specialization
demanded by the manufacture of flint implements.
This is the stage reached, we believe, in late Pliocene times in which the human
ancestor emerges from the age of mammals and enters the age of man, the
period when the prehistory of man properly begins. The attitude is erect, the
hand has a well-developed opposable thumb, the centres of the brain relating to
the higher senses and to the control of all the motions of the limbs, hands, and
fingers are well developed. The power of speech may still be rudimentary. The
anterior centres of the brain for the storing of experience and the development
of ideas are certainly very rudimentary.

Change of Environment in Europe
Considering that the origin and development of any creature are best furthered
by a struggle for existence sufficiently severe to demand the full and frequent
exercise of its powers of mind and body, it is interesting to trace the sequence
of natural events which prepared western Europe for the entrance of the earliest
branches of the human race. The forests and plants portray even more vividly
than the animals the changing conditions of the environment and temperature
which marked the approach and various vicissitudes of the great Ice Age.

Page 106

The forests of central France in Pliocene times, as well as those of the valley of
the Arno in northern Italy, were very similar to the forests of the middle United
States at the present time, comprising such trees as the sassafras, the locust, the
honey-locust, the sumach, the bald cypress, and the tulip. Thus the regions
which harbored the rich forest and meadow fauna of northern Italy in Upper
Pliocene times abounded in trees familiar to-day in North and South Carolina,
including even such distinctively American forms as the sweet gum
(Liquidambar styraciflua), the sour gum (Nyssa sylvatica), and the bay, beside
those above mentioned. To the south, along the Mediterranean, there also
flourished trees incident to a more tropical climate, the bamboo, the sabal palm,
and the dwarf fan-palm; most interesting is the presence of the sabal, which
now flourishes in the subtropical rain forests of central Florida. The sequoia
also was abundant. Toward the close of the Pliocene the first indications of the
coming Glacial Epoch were a lowering of the temperature, and, in the higher
mountainous areas perhaps, a beginning of the glacial stages.
The ancestors of the modern forests of Europe predominated in central France:
the oak, the beech, the poplar, the willow, and the larch. It is these forests,
which survived the vicissitudes of glacial times, that gave descent to the forests
of Postglacial Europe, while all the purely American types disappeared from
Europe and are now found only in the temperate regions of the United States.(5)
We have seen that anthropoid apes have not been discovered either in the
Middle or Upper Pliocene of Europe; the gibbon-ape line disappears with the
Pliohylobates of the Upper Pliocene. These animals are, however, rarely found
in fossil form, owing to their retreat to the trees in times of flood and danger, so
that we need not necessarily assume that the anthropoids had actually become
extinct in France. The primates which are found in the Upper Pliocene belong
to the lower types of the Old World monkeys, related to the living langur of
India and to the macaque and baboon. The evidence, as far as it goes, indicates
that the ancestors of man were at this time evolving in Asia and not in Europe.
This evidence, nevertheless, would be completely offset if it could be proven
that the eoliths, or primitive flints, found in various parts of Europe from
Oligocene to Pleistocene times are really artifacts of human or prehuman
origin.
The mammals of Europe in Pliocene times were derived by very remote
migrations from North America and, more directly, from southern Asia. The
Oriental element is very strong, including types of rhinoceroses now peculiar to
Sumatra and southern Asia, numerous mastodons very similar to the south

Page 107

Asiatic types of the times, gazelles and antelopes, including types related to the
existing elands, and primitive types of horses and of tapirs. Among the
carnivores in Europe similar to south Asiatic species were the hyænas, the dog
bears (Hyænarctos), the civets, and the pandas (Ailurus); there were also the
sabre-tooth tigers and numerous other felines. In the trees were found the south
Asiatic and north African monkeys; and in the forests the axis deer, now
restricted to Asia. But the most distinctive African-Asiatic animal of this period
was found in the rivers; namely, the hippopotamus, which arrived in Italy in the
early Pliocene and ranged south by way of the Sicilian land bridge into
northern Africa and east along the southern shores of the Black Sea to the
Siwalik hills of India. Thus, many of the ancestors of what we have termed the
African-Asiatic mammal group of Pleistocene times had already found their
way into Europe early in Pliocene times. In middle and late Pliocene times
there arrived three very important types of mammals which played a great rôle
in the early Pleistocene. These are:
The true horses (Equus stenonis) of remote North American origin.
The first true cattle (Leptobos elatus), originating in southern Asia.
The true elephants, first Elephas planifrons and later E.
meridionalis, better known as the southern mammoth, both
originating in Asia.
The forests and river borders of the valley of the Arno, near Florence, contained
all these African-Asiatic animals in Upper Pliocene times. Here they received
their names which remind us of this region of Italy as it is to-day, such as the
Etruscan rhinoceros (Dicerorhinus etruscus), the Florentine macaque (Macacus
florentinus), Steno's horse (Equus stenonis), the Etruscan cattle (Leptobos
etruscus), which was the earliest ox to reach Europe.
In Italy and France these African-Asiatic mammals were mingled with
ancestors of the more hardy Eurasiatic forest and meadow group. Of these the
most graceful were a variety of deer with very elaborate or many-branched
antlers, hence known as the 'polycladine' deer. In the forests roamed the wild
boars of Auvergne (Sus arvernensis), also the bears of Auvergne (Ursus
arvernensis), lynxes, foxes, and wildcats. In the rivers swam the otter and the
beaver, closely allied to existing forms. Among the rocks of the high hills were
the pikas or tailless hares (Lagomys), also hamsters, moles, and shrews.

Page 108

Many of the most characteristic animals of the dry modern plateaus of Africa
had disappeared from Europe before the close of Pliocene times, namely,
species of gazelles, antelopes, and the hipparion horses, all of which were
adapted to the dry uplands or deserts of Africa. In the remaining faune Pliocène
récente of French authors we find evidence that the Pliocene in all of western
Europe closed with a moist, warm, temperate climate, with wide-spread forests
and rivers interspersed with meadows favorable to the life of a great variety of
browsing deer as well as of grazing elephants, horses and cattle. The flora of
the Middle Pliocene as found at Meximieux indicates a mean annual
temperature of 62° to 63° Fahr.
One of the proofs of the gradual lowering of temperature toward the close of
Pliocene times in Europe is the southward retreat and disappearance of the apes
and monkeys; the Upper Miocene gibbon is found as far north as Eppelsheim,
near Worms, Germany; in Lower Pliocene times the monkeys and apes are
found only in the forests of the south of France; in Upper Pliocene times they
are recorded only in the forests of northern Italy; the evidence, so far as it goes,
indicates a gradual retreat toward the south.
Finally, at the end of the Pliocene there existed very close geographic relations
eastward with the mammalian life of India by way of what was then the
isthmus of the Dardanelles and southward with the mammalian life of Africa by
way of the Sicilian land bridge. This would indicate that the long lines of
eastward and westward migration were open and favorable to the arrival in
western Europe of new migrants from the far east, including perhaps the most
primitive races of man. There is not the least evidence that Pliocene man or
ancestors of man existed in Europe, excepting such as may be afforded by the
problematic eoliths, or most primitive flints.

The First Glaciation
In Upper Pliocene times cold marine currents(6) from the north began to flow
along the southeastern coast of England, with indications of a gradually
lowering temperature culminating at a time when the sea abounded in the arctic
mollusks, which have been preserved in the 'Weybourn Crags,' a geologic
formation along the coast of Norfolk. This arctic current was the herald of the
First Glacial Stage.

Page 109

It does not appear that a glacial cap of any considerable extent was formed in
Great Britain at this stage, but about this time the first great ice-cap was formed
in British North America west of Hudson Bay, which sent its ice-sheets as far
south as Iowa and Nebraska. In the latter State forests of spruce and other
coniferous species indicate the appearance of a cool temperate flora in advance
of the glaciation. In the Swiss Alps the snow descended 1,200 meters below the
present snow-line, and in Scandinavia and northern Germany the first great ice-
sheets were formed from which flowed the glaciers and rivers conveying the
'Old Diluvium,' or the 'oldest drift.' Accompanying the cold wave along the
eastern coast of England we note, in the famous fossil deposits known as the
'Forest Bed of Cromer,' which overlie the Weybourn Crags, the arrival from the
north of the fir-tree (Abies). This is most significant, because it had hitherto
been known only in the arctic region of Grinnell Land, and this was its first
appearance in central Europe. Another herald of northern conditions was the
first occurrence of the musk-ox in England, which is attributed(7) to the 'Forest
Bed' deposits.

Page 110

Larger Image

Fig. 25. The First (Günz)
Glacial Stage was far
less extensive than that
in the above map, which
shows Europe in the
Second Glacial Stage,
during the greatest
extension of the ice-
fields and glaciers (dots),
a period of continental
depression in which the
Mediterranean, Black,
and Caspian Seas were
connected. The line from
Scandinavia to the Atlas
Mountains corresponds
with the section shown
in Fig. 13, p. 37. Drawn

Page 111

by C. A. Reeds, after
James Geikie and Penck.

While Great Britain was less affected at this time than other regions, there is
no doubt as to the vast extent of the First Glacial Stage in British America,
in Scandinavia, and in the Alps; in the latter region it has been termed 'the
Günz stage' by Penck and Brückner. The 'drift' deposits have a general
thickness of 98½ feet (30 m.), but they are largely covered and buried by
those of the far more extensive Second Glacial Stage. The Scandinavian
ice-sheet(8) not only occupied the basin of the Baltic but overflowed Scania
—the southern part of Sweden—and extended as far south as Hamburg and
Berlin. In the Alps the glaciers passed down all the great mountain valleys
to the low grounds of the foreland, implying a depression of the snow-line
to 4,000 feet below its present level.

Fig. 26. The musk-ox,
belonging to the tundra

Page 112

region of the arctic
circle, which is reported
to have migrated as far
south as the southern
coast of England during
the First (Günz) Glacial
Stage.

The First Interglacial Stage. Eoliths
Proofs that a prolonged cool wave passed over Britain during the first
glaciation are seen in its after effects, namely, in the modernization of the
forests and in the disappearance both in Britain and France of a very
considerable number of animals which were abundant in Upper Pliocene
times. Yet by far the greater part of the Pliocene mammal life survived, a
fact which tends to show that, while very cold conditions of climate and
great precipitation of moisture may have characterized the regions
immediately surrounding the ice-fields, the remainder of western Europe at
most passed through a prolonged cool period during the climax of the First
Glacial Stage. This was followed during the First Interglacial by the return
of a period somewhat warmer than the present.
This First Interglacial Stage is known as the Norfolkian, from the fact that it
was first recognized in Europe in the deposits known as the 'Forest Bed of
Cromer,' Norfolk, which contain rich records not only of the forests of the
period, but of the noble forms of mammals which roamed over Great
Britain and France in Norfolkian times. The forests of Norfolk, in latitude
52° 40' N. mainly abounded in trees still indigenous to this region, such as
the maple, elm, birch, willow, alder, oak, beech, pine, and spruce, a forest
flora closely corresponding to that of the Norfolk and Suffolk coasts of
England at the present time, although we find in this fossil flora several
exotic species which give it a slightly different character.(9) From this tree
flora Reid concludes that the climate of southeastern England was nearly
the same as at present but slightly warmer.
We note especially that a very great change had taken place in the entire
disappearance in these forests of the trees which in Pliocene times were

Page 113

common to Europe and America, as described above; in other words, the
flora of Europe was greatly impoverished during the first cold wave.
In southern France, as at the present time, the interglacial climatic
conditions were milder, for we find numerous species of plants, which are
now represented in the Caucasus, Persia, southern Italy, Portugal, and
Japan. Thus the First Interglacial Stage, which was a relatively short one,
enjoyed a temperature now belonging about 4° of latitude farther south.
This First Interglacial Stage is also known as the St.-Prestien, because
among the many localities in France and Italy which preserve the plant and
mammal life of the times that of St. Prest, in the Paris basin, is the most
famous. Here in 1863 Desnoyers(10) first reported the discovery of a number
of mammal bones with incision lines upon them, which he considered to be
the work of man. These deposits were regarded at the time as of Pliocene
age, and this gave rise immediately to a wide-spread theory of the
appearance of man as early as the Pliocene. The human origin of the
incisions discovered by Desnoyers has long been a matter of dispute and is
now regarded as very improbable. Similar lines may be of animal origin,
namely, marks left by claws or teeth, or due to accidental pressure of sharp
cutting surfaces. However, we do not pretend to express an opinion of any
value as to the cause of these incisions. Supposed confirmation of the
evidence of Desnoyers of the existence of Pliocene man was the alleged
finding by Abbott of several worked flints, two in situ, in the 'Forest Bed of
Cromer,' Norfolk. Many years later in similar deposits at St. Prest were
discovered the supposed 'eoliths' which have been referred to the Étage
Prestien by Rutot. The age of the St. Prest deposits is, therefore, a matter of
the very highest interest and importance.

Page 114

Fig. 27. The giant deer
(Megaceros), which first
appears in western
Europe during the First
Interglacial Stage,
probably as a migrant
from the forested regions
of Eurasia. After a
painting by Charles R.
Knight, in the American
Museum of Natural
History.

St. Prest is not Pliocene; it is rather the most ancient Pleistocene deposit in
the basin of Paris,(11) and these incised mammal bones probably date from
the First Interglacial Stage. The bed which has yielded the incised bones
and the rich series of fossils consists of coarse river sands and gravels,
forming part of a 'high terrace,' 98½ feet (30 m.) above the present level of

Page 115

the river Eure. This, like other 'high terraces,' contains a characteristic First
Interglacial fauna, including the southern mammoth (E. meridionalis), and
Steno's horse (E. stenonis). We also find here other very characteristic early
Pleistocene mammals, such as the Etruscan rhinoceros (D. etruscus), the
giant hippopotamus of early Pleistocene times (H. major), the giant beaver
of the early Pleistocene (Trogontherium), three forms of the common
beaver (Castor), and one of the bison (Bison antiquus). This mammalian
life of St. Prest is very similar to that of Norfolk, England; to that of
Malbattu in central France, Puy-de-Dôme; of Peyrolles, near the mouth of
the Rhône, in southern France; of Solilhac near Puy; of Durfort, Gard; of
Cajarc, Lot-et-Garonne; and finally to that of the valley of the Arno, in
northern Italy.
One reason why certain authors, such as Boule and Depéret, have placed
this stage in the Upper Pliocene is that the mammals include so many
surviving Pliocene forms, such as the sabre-tooth tigers (Machærodus), the
'polycladine' deer with the elaborate antlers (C. sedgwicki), the Etruscan
rhinoceros, and the primitive Steno's horse. But we have recently
discovered that, with the exception of the 'polycladine' deer, these mammals
certainly survived in Europe as late as the Second Interglacial Stage, and
there is said to be evidence that some even persisted into the Third
Interglacial Stage.
It is, therefore, the extinction or disappearance from Europe of many of the
animals very abundant even in late Pliocene times which marks this fauna
as early Pleistocene. Anthropoid apes are no longer found; indeed, there is
no evidence of the survival of any of the primates, except macaques, which
survive in the Pyrenees to late Pleistocene times; the tapir has entirely
disappeared from the forests of Europe; but the most significant departure is
that of the mastodon, which is believed to have lingered in north Africa and
which certainly survived in America into very late Pleistocene times. The
animal life of western Europe, like the plant life, has lost one part of its
Pliocene aspect while retaining another part, both in its mammalian fauna
and in its forest flora.

Page 116

Fig. 28. The sabre-tooth tiger
(Machærodus), which
survives from the Upper
Pliocene and is widely
distributed over western
Europe until the Middle
Pleistocene. After a
painting by Charles R.
Knight, in the American
Museum of Natural
History.

The living environment as a whole, moreover, takes on a novel aspect
through the arrival, chiefly from the north, of the more hardy animals and
plants which had been evolving for a very long period of time in the
temperate forests and meadows of Eurasia to the northeast and northwest.
From this Eurasiatic region came the stag, or red deer (Cervus elaphus),
also the giant deer (Megaceros), and from the northerly swamps the broad-
headed moose (Alces latifrons). The presence of members of the deer
family (Cervidæ) in great numbers and representing many different lines of

Page 117

descent is one of the most distinctive features of First Interglacial times.
Beside the new northerly forms mentioned above, there was the roe-deer
(Capreolus), which still survives in Europe, but there is no longer any
record of the beautiful axis deer (Axis), which has now retreated to southern
Asia. The 'polycladine' deer, first observed in the valley of the Arno, is
represented in First Interglacial times by Sedgwick's deer (C. sedgwicki), in
Norfolk, and by the species C. dicranius of northern Italy, where there also
occurs the 'deer of the Carnutes' (C. carnutorum).
We observe that browsing, forest-living, and river-living types predominate.
Among the forest-frequenting carnivores were the wolverene, the otter, two
kinds of bear, the wolf, the fox, and the marten; another forest dweller was a
wild boar, related to the existing Sus scrofa of Europe.
Thus in the very beginning of Pleistocene times the forests of Europe were
full of a wild life very similar to that of prehistoric times, mingled with
which was the Oriental element, the great elephants, rhinoceroses, and
hippopotami connecting Europe with the far east. Among these eastern
migrants in the early Pleistocene were two new arrivals, the primitive wild
cattle (Bos primigenius), and the first of the bison (Bison priscus).
The theoretical map of western Europe during First Interglacial times (Fig.
12, also Fig. 56) enables us to understand these migrations from the
northeast and from the Orient. As indicated by the sunken river channels
discovered on the old continental shelf, the coast-line extended far to the
west to the borders of the continental plateau which is now sunk deep
beneath the ocean; the British Isles were separated from France not by the
sea but by a broad valley, while the Rhine, with the Thames as a western
tributary flowed northward over an extensive flood-plain, which is the
present floor of the North Sea basin.(12) It is not improbable that the rich
mammalian life deposits in the 'Forest Bed of Cromer,' Norfolk, were
washed down by tributaries of this ancient Rhine River.
In all the great rivers of this enlarged western Europe occurred the
hippopotami, and along the river borders and in the forests browsed the
Etruscan rhinoceros. Among the grazing and meadow-living forms of the
Norfolk country of Britain were species of wild cattle (Bos, Leptobos),
together with two species of horses, including a lighter form resembling

Page 118

Steno's horse (E. stenonis cocchi) of the Val d'Arno and a heavier type
probably belonging to the forests. The giant elephant of this period is the
southern mammoth (E. meridionalis trogontherii), a somewhat specialized
descendant of the Pliocene southern mammoth of the valley of the Arno;
this animal is best known from a superb specimen discovered at Durfort
(Fig. 42) and preserved in the Paris Museum. It is said to have attained a
height of over 12 feet as compared with 11 feet 3 inches, the height of the
largest existing African elephants. It is probable that all these south Asiatic
migrants into Europe were partially or wholly covered with hair, in
adaptation to the warm, temperate climate of the summers and the cool
winters. To the south, in the still milder climate of Italy, the arrival of
another great species, known as the 'ancient' or 'straight-tusked elephant' (E.
antiquus), is recorded. This animal had not yet reached France or Britain.
Preying upon the defenseless members of this heterogeneous fauna were the
great machærodonts, or sabre-tooth tigers, which ranged over Europe and
northern Africa and into Asia. It does not appear that the true lions (Felis
leo) had as yet entered Europe.
An intercommunication of life over a vast area extending 6,000 miles from
the Thames valley on the west to India on the southeast is indicated by the
presence of six or more similar or related species of elephants and
rhinoceroses. Twenty-five hundred miles southeast of the foot-hills of the
Himalayas similar herds of mammals, but in an earlier stage of evolution,
roamed over the island of Java, which was then a part of the Asiatic
mainland.

The Trinil Race of Java
The human interest in this great life throng lies in the fact that the migration
routes opened by these great races of animals may also have afforded a
pathway for the earliest races of men. Thus the discovery of the Trinil race
in central Java, amidst a fauna closely related to that of the foot-hills of the
Himalayas and more remotely related to that of southern Europe, has a
more direct bearing upon our subject than would at first appear.

Page 119

Fig. 29. Restoration of
Pithecanthropus, the
Java ape-man, modelled
by the Belgian artist
Mascré, under the
direction of Professor A.
Rutot, of Brussels,
Belgium.

Page 120

Fig. 30. The Solo or
Bengawan River in
central Java. Scene of the
discovery of the type
specimen of
Pithecanthropus erectus
in 1894. After Selenka
and Blanckenhorn.
Compare map (Fig. 32,
p. 75).

On the Bengawan River in central Java, a Dutch army surgeon, Eugen
Dubois, had been excavating for fossils in the hope of finding prehuman
remains. In the year 1891 he found near Trinil a deposit of numerous
mammal bones, including a single upper molar tooth which he regarded as
that of a new species of ape. On carefully clearing away the rock the top of
a skull appeared at about a meter's distance from the tooth. Further
excavation at the close of the rainy season brought to light a second molar
tooth and a left thigh-bone about 15 meters from the spot where the skull

Page 121

was found, imbedded and fossilized in the same manner. These scattered
parts were described by Dubois(13) in 1894 as the type of Pithecanthropus
erectus,[O] a term signifying the upright-standing ape-man. The specific
term erectus refers to the thigh-bone, of which the author observes: "We
must therefore conclude that the femur of Pithecanthropus was designed for
the same mechanical functions as that of man. The two articulations and the
mechanical axis correspond so exactly to the same parts in man that the law
of perfect harmony between the form and function of a bone will
necessitate the conclusion that this fossil creature had the same upright
posture as man and likewise walked on two legs.... From this it necessarily
follows that the creature had the free use of the upper extremities—now
superfluous for walking—and that these last were no doubt already far
advanced in that line of differentiation which developed them in mankind
into tools and organs of touch.... From a study of the femur and skull it
follows with certainty that this fossil cannot be classified as simian.... And,
as with the skull, so also with the femur, the differences that separate
Pithecanthropus from man are less than those distinguishing it from the
highest anthropoid.... Although far advanced in the course of differentiation,
this Pleistocene form had not yet attained to the human type.
Pithecanthropus erectus is the transition form between man and the
anthropoids which the laws of evolution teach us must have existed. He is
the ancestor of man."
Thus the author placed Pithecanthropus in a new family, of the order
Primates, which he named the Pithecanthropidæ.

Page 122

Fig. 31. Geological section of the volcano of Lawoe in the Solo River basin.
Drawn by C. A. Reeds.

Fig. 32. Map of the Solo
River, showing the
Pithecanthropus
discovery site, also two
excavations (Pit No. 1,

Page 123

Pit No. 2) in the ancient
gravel of the river-
bottom, made by the
Selenka-Blanckenhorn
expedition of 1907. After
Selenka and
Blanckenhorn.

The geologic age of the bones referred to is a matter of first importance.
The remains of Pithecanthropus lay in a deposit about one meter in
thickness, consisting of loose, coarse, tufaceous sandstones, below this a
stratum of hard, blue-gray clay, and under that marine breccia. Above the
Pithecanthropus layer were the 'Kendeng' strata, a many-layered tufaceous
sandstone, about 15 meters in thickness. This geologic series was
considered by Dubois and others to be of late Tertiary or Pliocene age;
Pithecanthropus accordingly became known as the long-awaited 'Pliocene
ape-man.' Subsequent researches by expert geologists have tended to refer
the age to the early Pleistocene.(17) According to Elbert(18) the Kendeng
strata overlying the Pithecanthropus layer correspond to an early pluvial
period of low temperature and, in point of time, to the Ice Age of Europe.
For even in Java one can distinguish three divisions of the Pleistocene
period, including the first period of low temperature to which the
Pithecanthropus layer is referred.

Larger Image

Fig. 33. Section
corresponding to line A-
B in Fig. 32, showing the

Page 124

river-drift gravels and
sands at the point where
the skull-top of
Pithecanthropus was
found. Drawn by C. A.
Reeds.
Recent 7 River wash, blue-black clay.

{ 6 Light-colored sandstone, like tuff.
{ 5 Gray tuff with balls of clay, fresh-water shells.
4 White streaked sandstone resembling tufa.
Pleistocene {
3 Blue-black clay with plant remains.
{ 2 Bone-bearing stratum. Pithecanthropus.
{ 1 Lahar conglomerate.

The fossil mammals contained in the Pithecanthropus layer have also been
thoroughly studied,(19) and they tend to confirm the original reference to the
uppermost Pliocene. They yield a very rich fauna similar to that of the
Siwalik hills of India, including the porcupine, pangolin, several felines, the
hyæna, and the otter. Among the primates beside Pithecanthropus there is a
macaque. Among the larger ungulates are two species of rhinoceros related
to existing Indian forms, the tapir, the boar, the hippopotamus, the axis and
rusa deer, the Indian buffalo, and wild cattle. It is noteworthy that three
species of late Pliocene elephants, all known as Stegodon, and especially
the species Stegodon ganeza, occur, as well as Elephas hysudricus, a
species related to E. antiquus, or the straight-tusked elephant, which entered
Europe in early Pleistocene times. Fossils of the same animals are found in
the foot-hills of the Himalayas of India, about 2,500 miles distant to the
northwest. The India deposits are considered of uppermost Pliocene age,(20)
for this is the closing life period of the upper Siwaliks of India.
Certainly Java was then a part of the Asiatic continent, and similar herds of
great mammals roamed freely over the plains from the foot-hills of the

Page 125

Himalaya Mountains to the borders of the ancient Trinil River, while similar
apes inhabited the forests. At this time the orang may have entered the
forests of Borneo, which are at present its home; it is the only ape thus far
found in the uppermost Pliocene of India. We may, therefore, anticipate the
discovery, at any time, in India of a race similar to Pithecanthropus.
The geologic age of the Trinil race is, therefore, to be considered as late
Pliocene or early Pleistocene.

Fig. 34. The top (1) and side
(1a) views of the skull-
top of Pithecanthropus
erectus. After Dubois.
One-third life size.

Page 126

This great discovery of Dubois aroused wide-spread and heated discussion,
in which the foremost anatomists and palæontologists of the world took
part. Some regarded the skull as that of a giant gibbon, others as prehuman,
and still others as a transition form. We may form our own opinion,
however, from a fuller understanding of the specimens themselves, always
keeping in mind that it is a question whether the femur and the skull belong
to the same individual or even to the same race. First, we are struck by the
marked resemblance which the top of the skull bears, both on viewing it
from the side and from above, to that of the Neanderthal race. This fully
justifies the opinion of the anatomist Schwalbe(21) that the skull of
Pithecanthropus is nearer to that of Neanderthal man than to that of even
the highest of the anthropoid apes. As measured by Schwalbe, the index of
the height of the cranium (Kalottenhöheindex) may be compared with
others as follows:

Lowest human race 52 per cent.
Neanderthal man 40.4 per cent.
Pithecanthropus, or Trinil race 34.2 per cent.

Fig. 35. Head of chimpanzee
—front and side views—
exhibiting a head of

Page 127

somewhat similar shape
to that of
Pithecanthropus, with
prominent eyebrow
ridges, but much smaller
brain capacity.
Photograph from the
New York Zoological
Park.

This accords with the estimate of the brain capacity[P] of 855 c.cm.
(Dubois) as compared with 1,230 c.cm., the smallest brain capacity found in
a member of the Neanderthal race. Second, as seen from above, we are
struck with the great length of the calvarium as compared with its breadth,
the cephalic index or ratio of breadth to length being 73.4 per cent
(Schwalbe) as compared with 73.9 per cent in the Neanderthal type skull;
this dolichocephaly accords with the fact that all of the earliest human races
thus far found are long-headed, although according to Schwalbe(22) all
anthropoids are broad-headed. This is a very important distinction. The
third feature is the prominence and width of the bony eyebrow ridges above
the orbits, which are almost as great as in the chimpanzee and greatly
exceed those of the Neanderthal race and of the modern Australian. The
profile of the Trinil head restored by McGregor (Fig. 38) exhibits this
prominent bony ridge and the low, retreating forehead. In the latest opinion
of Schwalbe(23) Pithecanthropus may be regarded as one of the direct
ancestors of Neanderthal man and even of the highest human species, Homo
sapiens. He also considers that when the lower jaw of the Trinil race
becomes known, it will be found to be very similar to that of the Heidelberg
man, the final conclusion being that Pithecanthropus and the nearly allied
Heidelberg man may be regarded as the common ancestors of the
Neanderthal race, on the one hand, and of the higher races on the other.
There are, however, reasons for excluding Pithecanthropus from the direct
ancestral line of the higher races of man.

Page 128

Fig. 36. Profile of the skull of
Pithecanthropus, as
restored by J. H.
McGregor. 1914. One-
third life size.

This prehuman stage has, none the less, a very great significance in the
developmental history of man. In our opinion it is the very stage which,
theoretically, we should anticipate finding in the dawn of the Pleistocene. A
similar view is taken by Büchner,(24) who presents in an admirable diagram
(Fig. 117) the result of his comparison of twelve different characters in the
skulls of Pithecanthropus, the Neanderthals, the Australians, and the
Tasmanians. One of the main objects of Büchner's research was a very
detailed comparison of the Trinil skull with that of the lowly and now
extinct Tasmanian race, which, we observe in the diagram, occupies a
position only a little higher than that of the Spy-Neanderthal race.

Page 129

Fig. 37. Three views of the
skull of Pithecanthropus,
as restored by J. H.
McGregor, showing the
original (shaded) and
restored (black lines)
portions. About one-
quarter life size.

If the femur belongs with the skull, the Trinils were a tall race, reaching a
height of 5 feet 7 inches as compared with 5 feet 3 inches in the
Neanderthals. The thigh-bone (Fig. 122) has a very slight curvature as
compared with that of any of the apes or lemurs, and in this respect is more
human; it is remarkably elongate (455 mm.), surpassing that of the
Neanderthals; the shin-bone (tibia) was probably correspondingly short.

Page 130

The two upper grinding-teeth preserved are much more human than those of
the gibbon, but they do not resemble those of man closely enough to
positively confirm the prehuman theory. Dubois observes:(25) "That the
tooth belongs to some hominid form needs no further demonstration. Aside
from its size and the greater roughness of the grinding surface, it differs
from the human grinder in that the less developed cusp of Pithecanthropus
is the posterior cusp next the cheek, while in man it is generally the
posterior cusp next the tongue. The simplification of the crown and the root
of the Trinil grinder is quite as extensive as it usually is in man."

Fig. 38. Profile view of the
head of Pithecanthropus,
the Java ape-man, after a
model by J. H.

Page 131

McGregor. One-quarter
life size.

Various efforts have been made to supplement the scattered and scanty
materials collected by Dubois. The Selenka expedition of 1907-8 brought
back a human left lower molar as the only result of an express search for
more Pithecanthropus remains. Dubois is also said to possess the fragment
of a primitive-looking lower jaw from the range known as the Kendeng
Hills, at the southern base of which lies the village of Trinil.
It remains for us to consider the stage of psychic evolution attained by the
Trinil race, and this naturally turns upon the erect attitude and what little is
known of the size and proportions of the brain.

Page 132

Fig. 39. Front view of the
head of Pithecanthropus,
the Java ape-man, after a
model by J. H.
McGregor. One-quarter
life size.

The assumption of the erect attitude is not merely a question of learning to
balance the body on the hinder extremities.(26) It involves changes in the
interior of the body, the loss of the tail, the freeing of the arms, and the
establishment of the diaphragm as the chief muscle of respiration. The
thigh-bone of Pithecanthropus is so much like that of man as to support the
theory that the erect position may have been assumed by the ancestors of
man as early as Oligocene times. It would appear that Pithecanthropus had
free use of the arms and it is possible that the control of the thumb and
fingers had been cultivated, perhaps in the fashioning of primitive
implements of wood and stone. The discovery of the use of wood as an
implement and weapon probably preceded that of the use of stone.
Elliot Smith describes this stage of development as follows:(27) "... The
emancipation of the hands from progression threw the whole responsibility
upon the legs, which became more efficient for their purpose as supports
once they lost their prehensile powers and became elongated and
specialized for rapid progression. Thus the erect attitude became
stereotyped and fixed and the limbs specialized, and these upright simians
emerged from their ancestral forests in societies, armed with sticks and
stones and with the rudiments of all the powers that eventually enabled
them to conquer the world. The greater exposure to danger which these
more adventurous spirits encountered once they emerged in the open, and
the constant struggles these first semihuman creatures must have had in
encounters with definite enemies, no less than with the forces of Nature,
provided the factors which rapidly weeded out those unfitted for the new
conditions and by natural selection made real men of the survivors."

Page 133

Fig. 40. Side view of brain of
high type, illustrating the
contrast between the
motor, sensory, and
ideational centres in a
high type of modern
brain; and Elliot Smith's
characterization of the
probable centres in the
Pithecanthropus type of
brain. Modified after M.
Allen Starr.

The undeveloped forehead of Pithecanthropus and the diminutive frontal
area of the brain indicate that the Trinil race had a limited faculty of
profiting by experience and accumulated tradition, for in this prefrontal area
of the brain are located the powers of attention and of control of the
activities of all other parts of the brain. In the brain of the ape the sensory
areas of touch, taste, and vision predominate, and these are well developed
in Pithecanthropus. The central area of the brain, which is the storehouse of

Page 134

the memories of actions and of the feelings associated with them, is also
well developed, but the prefrontal area, which is the seat of the faculty of
profiting by experience or of recalling the consequences of previous
responses to experience, is developed to a very limited degree.(28) Thus,
while the brain of Pithecanthropus is estimated at 855-900 c.cm., as
compared with 600 c.cm. of the largest simian brain, and 930 c.cm. of the
smallest brain recorded in the lower members of the human race, it
indicates a very low stage of intelligence.

Fig. 41. Diagram showing the
side (lower figure) and
top (upper figure) views
of the outline of the
Pithecanthropus brain as
compared with that of

Page 135

the chimpanzee and the
higher human types of
the Piltdown,
Neanderthal, and modern
races.

Absence of Palæoliths and Presence of Eoliths in Western Europe
Returning to First Interglacial conditions in Europe, we observe that the
river courses flowed through the same valleys as at present but that in early
glacial times the channels were far broader and were elevated from 100 to
150 feet above the present relatively narrow river levels. The vast floods of
the succeeding glaciation filled these valleys, but some of the 'high terraces'
were already formed. It is extremely important to note that Pre-Chellean
flints or true palæoliths have never been found in the sands or gravels of
these 'high terraces.'
Eoliths found on this 'high-terrace' level at St. Prest belong to the Prestien
culture of Rutot,(29) who regards this station as of Upper Pliocene age.
These, like other supposed Eolithic flints, are very rough, but, rude as they
are, they generally exhibit one part shaped as if to be grasped by the hand,
while the other part is edged or pointed as for cutting. It is generally
admitted that these flints are mostly of accidental shapes, and there has been
little or no proof of their being fashioned by human hands. On this point
Boule(30) observes: "As to the eoliths, I have combated the theory not only
because it seems to me improbable but because a long geological
experience has shown me that it is often impossible to distinguish stones
split, cut, or retouched by purely physical agents from certain products of
rudimentary workmanship."
On the other side, it is interesting at this point to quote the words of
MacCurdy:(31) "My opinion, based on personal experience, ... is that the
existence of a primitive industry, antedating what is commonly accepted as
Palæolithic, has been established. This industry occurs as far back as the
Upper Miocene and continues on through the Upper Tertiary into and
including the Lower Quaternary. The distinguishing characters of the
industry remain but little changed throughout the entire period, the

Page 136

subdivision of the period into epochs being based on stratigraphy [geologic
stages] and not on industrial characters. The requirements in the way of
tools being very simple and the supply of material in the way of natural
flakes and fragments of flint being very plentiful, the inventive powers of
the population remained dormant for ages. Hammer and knife were the
original tools. Both were picked up ready-made. A sharp-edged, natural
flake served for one, and a nodule or fragment served for the other. When
the edge of the flake became dulled by use, the piece was either thrown
away or the edge was retouched for further use. If hammer or flake did not
admit of being held comfortably in the hand, the troublesome points or
edges were removed or reduced by chipping. The stock of tools increased
slowly with the slowly growing needs. As these multiplied and the natural
supply of raw material diminished, the latter was supplemented by the
manufacture of artificial flakes. When the lesson of associating definite
forms of implements with definite uses was learned, special types arose,
notably the amygdaloid implement and the poniard. Then came the
transition from the Eolithic to the Palæolithic, a stage that has been so
thoroughly investigated by Rutot."
It is not improbable that the Trinil race was in a stage of Eolithic culture; it
is highly probable that the prehuman races of this very remote geologic age
used more than one weapon of wood and stone.

The Great Second Glaciation
(Fig. 25, p. 65)
In early Pleistocene times a general elevation of southern Europe united the
islands of the Mediterranean with Europe on the north and with Africa on
the south, forming broad land connections between the two continents
which afforded both northward and southward migration routes. At this
time certain characteristically African mammals, such as the straight-tusked
elephant and the lion, were probably finding their way north; Sicily at this
time gained its large fauna of elephants and hippopotami, and the island of
Malta was connected with the mainland, as well as the easterly islands of
Cyprus and Crete. It appears probable that the connection between the
Italian mainland and Malta was renewed more than once.

Page 137

The approach of the second glaciation is indicated along the southeast coast
of Great Britain by the subsidence of the land and the rise of the sea,
accompanied by a fresh arctic current, bringing with it an invasion of arctic
mollusks which were deposited in a layer of marine beds directly over those
which contain the rich warm fauna and flora of the 'Forest Bed of Cromer,'
Norfolk.(32) It also appears probable that a cold northern current swept
along the western coasts of Europe, and Geikie estimates that a lowering of
temperature occurred of not less than 20° Fahr., a change as great as is now
experienced in passing from the south of England to the North Cape.

Pl . III. Pithecanthropus
erectus, the ape-man of
Java. Antiquity estimated

Page 138

at 500,000 years. After
the restoration modelled
by J. H. McGregor. It is
not improbable that the
prehuman races of this
remote geologic age used
more than one natural
weapon of wood or
stone, the latter of the
accidental 'Eolithic' type.

The second glaciation was by far the greatest both in Europe and America.
In the region of the Pyrenees, which at the very much later period of the
Third Interglacial Stage became a favorite country with Palæolithic man,
there were glaciers of vast extent. This is realized by comparison with
present conditions. The largest of the present glaciers of the Pyrenees is
only 2 miles in length and terminates at a height of 7,200 feet above the sea.
During the greatest glaciation the snow appears to have descended 4,265
feet below its present level. From the Pyrenees through the Gallego valley
into Spain there flowed a glacier 38 miles in length, while to the north the
glacier in the valley of the Garonne flowed for a distance of 45 miles to a
point near Montréjeau. Even in its lower reaches this glacier was over half a
mile in thickness. To the east was a glacier 38 miles in length, filling the
valley of the Ariège and covering the sites of such great Palæolithic caverns
as that of Niaux; it is probable that at this time the formation of this cavern
began. That these glaciers were all prior to the period of the Lower
Palæolithic Acheulean culture is proven by the fact that Acheulean
implements are frequently met with lying on the surface of the moraines
laid down by these ancient ice-floes.(33)
To the north was the vast Scandinavian ice-field, which swept over Great
Britain and beyond the valleys of the Rhine, Elbe, and Vistula, reaching
nearly to the Carpathians. Even the lesser mountain chains were capped
with glaciers, including the Atlas Mountains in northern Africa.

Page 139

In North America from the great centre west of Hudson Bay the ice-cap
extended its drift southward into Missouri, Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska,
beyond the limits of earlier and subsequent glaciations.
The materials of the chief 'high terraces' of the great river-valleys of
western Europe were deposited at this time.

Life of the Warm Second Interglacial Stage
The long warm period which followed the great glaciation is remarkable in
presenting the first proofs of the presence of man in western Europe. It is
the period of the Heidelberg race of man (Homo heidelbergensis), known
only from a single jaw discovered by Schoetensack in the Mauer sands near
Heidelberg, in 1907. No other proofs of the existence of man have been
found in any of the deposits which took place during this vast interval of
geologic time, unless we accept the theory of Penck and of Geikie that the
Pre-Chellean and Chellean quarries of the River Somme belong in the
Second Interglacial Stage.
The vast duration of this interglacial time is evidenced both in Europe and
America by the deep cutting and wearing away of the 'drifts' brought down
by the second glaciation. Penck believes that this 'long warm stage'
represents a greater period of time than the entire interval between the third
glaciation and the present time. The climate immediately following the
retreat of the glaciers was cool and moist in the glaciated regions, but this
was followed by such a prolonged period of heat and dryness that the
glaciers on the Alps withdrew to a point far above their present limits.
In one of the old 'high terraces' of the River Inn, in the north Tyrol, is a
deposit containing the prevailing forest flora of the period, from which
Penck concludes that the climate of Innsbruck was 2° C. higher than it is at
the present time. Corresponding with this the snow-line stood 1,000 feet
above its present level, and the Alps, save for the higher peaks, were almost
completely denuded of ice and snow. A characteristic plant is the Pontic
alpine rose (Rhododendron ponticum), which flourishes now in an annual
temperature of 57°-65° Fahr.,(34) indicating that the climate of Innsbruck
was as genial as that of the Italian slopes of the Alps to-day. This

Page 140

rhododendron is now found in the Caucasus. Other southern species of the
time were a buckthorn, related to a species now living in the Canary
Islands, and the box. There were also more hardy plants, including the fir
(Pinus sylvestris), spruce, maple, willow, yew, elm, beech, and mountain-
ash. The forests of the same period in Provence were, for the most part,
similar to those now found in that region; out of thirty-seven species
twenty-nine still occur in this part of southern France. On the whole, the
aspect of southern France at this time was surprisingly modern. The forests
included oaks, elms, poplars, willows, lindens, maples, sumachs, dogwood,
and hawthorn. Among the climbing plants were the vine and the clematis.
Here also were some forms which have since retreated to the south, such as
species of the sweet bay and laurel which are now confined to the Canary
Islands. The great humidity of the time is indicated by the presence of
certain species of conifers which require considerable moisture. As in First
Interglacial times, the presence of the fig indicates mild winters.
It is difficult to imagine forests of this modern character, which farther
northward included a number of still more temperate and hardy species, as
the setting of the great African and Asiatic life that roamed all over western
Europe at this time. It was the presence of hippopotami, elephants, and
rhinoceroses which gave to Lyell, Evans, and other early observers the
impression that a tropical temperature and vegetation were characteristic of
this long life period. These animals were formerly regarded as proofs of an
almost tropical climate, but the more trustworthy evidence of the forests,
strengthened by that of the presence of very numerous hardy types of forest
and meadow animals, has set aside all the early theories as to extremely
warm temperatures during Second Interglacial times.
The remains of what is still conveniently known as the 'faune chaude,' or
warm fauna, are chiefly found in the sands and gravels of the ancient beds
of the Neckar, Garonne, and Thames, and other rivers of the north and
south, also in Essex, England. The most surprising fact is that the mammal
life of western Europe remained entirely unchanged by the vast second
glaciation just described; the few extinctions which occurred as well as a
number of new arrivals may be attributed to new geographical connections
with Africa on the south and to the steady progress of migration from the
far east.

Page 141

Fig. 42. The hippopotamus
(H. major) and the
southern mammoth (E.
meridionalis
trogontherii), a pair of
mammals which enjoyed
a similar range over
western Europe from the
close of the Pliocene
until the middle of Third
Interglacial times, when
their remains are found
associated with flints of
Pre-Chellean, Chellean,
and early Acheulean age.

Page 142

One-sixtieth life size.
Drawn by Erwin S.
Christman.

There were four very important and distinctive new arrivals from the
African-Asiatic world, namely, the straight-tusked or ancient elephant (E.
antiquus), the broad-nosed rhinoceros (D. merckii), the African lion (Felis
leo), and the African hyæna (H. striata), which bespeak close geographical
connections with northern Africa. Of these the ancient elephant and the
broad-nosed rhinoceros were close companions; they enjoyed the same
regions and the same temperatures, their remains are very frequently found
together, and they survived to the very end of the great life stage of western
Europe, which closed with the advent of the fourth glaciation. They are in
contrast to the other pair of great mammals which was already present in
Europe in Pliocene and First Interglacial times, namely, the southern
mammoth, at this stage known as Elephas trogontherii, which had a
preference for the companionship of the hippopotamus (H. major); it would
seem that these animals were less hardy because both disappeared from
Europe a little earlier than the ancient elephant and Merck's rhinoceros.

Page 143

Fig. 43. The other and hardier
pair of large African-
Asiatic mammals,
namely, the broad-nosed
or Merck's rhinoceros (R.
merckii) and the straight-
tusked or ancient
elephant (E. antiquus),
which entered western
Europe in Second
Interglacial times and
survived until Third
Interglacial times, when
their remains are found
intermingled with flints
of the Acheulean and
early Mousterian
cultures. These mammals
were doubtless hunted by

Page 144

men of the early
Neanderthal races. One-
sixtieth life size. Drawn
by Erwin S. Christman.

The African lion would appear to have been a competitor of the sabre-tooth
tiger, for the latter animal now becomes less abundant, although there is
reason to believe that it survived until the Third Interglacial Stage. With the
ancient Pliocene type of the sabre-tooth were also found the Etruscan
rhinoceros, the primitive bear of Auvergne (Ursus arvernensis), and the
giant beaver (Trogontherium cuvieri).

Larger Image

Page 145

Fig. 44. Map showing the
wide geographic
distribution (horizontal
lines) of Merck's
rhinoceros and the
straight-tusked elephant,
which first entered
western Europe during
the First Interglacial
Stage and survived until
nearly the close of the
Third Interglacial Stage.
The hippopotamus,
which entered Europe in
Pliocene times, survived
until after the middle of
the Third Interglacial
Stage and had a more
limited distribution.
After Boule.

The northern forests of the time were frequented by the broad-faced moose,
the giant deer, and the roe-deer, as well as by noble specimens of the stag
(Cervus elaphus). In the open forests and meadows the wild cattle (Bos
primigenius) began to be more numerous and the bison (Bison priscus) also
occurred. Among the meadow or forest frequenting forms were horses of
larger size, such as the horses of Mosbach and of Süssenborn. In this
assemblage of northern and southern types it is noteworthy that the
Eurasiatic forest and meadow types of mammals greatly predominate in
numbers and in variety over the African-Asiatic types; this, together with
the flora, is an indication that the climate was of a temperate character; it is
probable, therefore, that all the mammals were well protected with a hairy
covering and adapted to a temperate climate. The fact that the fauna as a
whole remained practically unchanged throughout the second glaciation is a
proof not that it migrated to the south and then returned but that the non-
glaciated regions of western Europe were temperate rather than cold.

Page 146

The Heidelberg Race
Heidelberg man.
Ancient elephant.
Etruscan rhinoceros.
Mosbach horse.
Wild boar.
Broad-faced moose.
Red deer, or stag.
Roe-deer.
Primitive bison (wisent).
Primitive ox (Aurochs, urus).
Auvergne bear.
Deninger's bear.
Lion.
Wildcat.
Wolf.
Beaver.
To us by far the most interesting mammalian life is that found south of the
mouth of the Neckar along the ancient stream Elsenz, where were deposited
the lower 'sands of Mauer,' containing the lower jaw of the Heidelberg man
and the remains of many animals of the period. The enumeration of this
entire fauna is very important, as indicating the temperate climatic
conditions which surrounded the first true species of man which has thus far
been discovered in Europe. The discoverer, Schoetensack,(35) referred these
mammals and the Heidelberg man to the First Interglacial Stage, and a
similar opinion has recently been expressed by Geikie. The presence of the
Etruscan rhinoceros would appear to point to such great antiquity, but the
evidence afforded by this primitive animal is overborne by that of three
mammals which are highly characteristic of Second Interglacial times; these
are the straight-tusked or ancient elephant (E. antiquus), the lion, and the
Mosbach horse. Excepting only the Etruscan rhinoceros, all these species
frequenting the ancient stream Elsenz and deposited with the 'sands of
Mauer' occurred also in the forests and meadows of the region now known
as Baden, where the fossil mammal deposits of Mosbach near the Neckar

Page 147

are found. A similar mammalian life of a somewhat more recent time occurs
in the river gravels of Süssenborn, near Weimar. The horses of Mauer, of
Mosbach, and of Süssenborn[Q] were of much larger size and of more
specialized character than Steno's horse of First Interglacial times.

Larger Image

Fig. 45. Section of the valley
of the stream Elsenz,
near Heidelberg,
showing the location of
the Mauer sand-pit in
which the Heidelberg
jaw was discovered. An
ancient layer of river-
drift. Drawn by C. A.
Reeds.

Thus the Heidelbergs, the first human race recorded in western Europe,
appear in northern Germany early in Second Interglacial times, in the midst
of a most imposing mammalian fauna of northern aspect and containing
many forest-living species, such as bear, deer, and moose; in the meadows
and forests browsed the giant, straight-tusked elephant (E. antiquus), which
from the simple structure of its grinding-teeth is regarded as similar in habit

Page 148

to the African elephant now inhabiting the forests of central Africa; the
presence of this animal indicates a relatively moist climate and well-
forested country. The Etruscan rhinoceros differed from the larger Merck's
form in the possession of relatively short-crowned grinding-teeth, adapted
to browsing habits and a forested country; on the head were borne two
horns; it was a long-limbed, rapidly moving type; the herds of bison and of
wild cattle (urus) which roamed over the plains were now subject to the
attack of the lion.

Fig. 46. Sand-pit at Mauer,
near Heidelberg, discovery
site of the jaw of Heidelberg
man. After Schoetensack.

Page 149

a-b. 'Newer loess,' either of
Third Interglacial or of
Postglacial times.
b-c. 'Older loess' (sandy loess)
of the close of Second
Interglacial times.
c-f. The 'sands of Mauer.'
d-e. An intermediate layer of
clay.
The white cross (X) indicates
the spot at the base of the
'sands of Mauer' at which
the jaw of Heidelberg
was discovered.

Fig. 47. The Heidelberg jaw, type of Homo heidelbergensis.
About two-thirds life size. After Schoetensack.
The discovery in 1907 of a human lower jaw in the base of the 'Mauer
sands' is one of the most important in the whole history of anthropology.
The find was made at a depth of 79 feet (24.10 m.) from the upper surface

Page 150

of a high bluff (Fig. 46), in ancient river sands which had long been known
to yield the very old mammalian fauna described above. For years the
workmen had been instructed to keep a sharp lookout for human remains.
The jaw had evidently drifted down with the river sands and had become
separated from the skull, but it remained in perfect preservation. The
author's description may first be quoted.(36) The mandible shows a
combination of features never before found in any fossil or recent man. The
protrusion of the lower jaw just below the front teeth which gives shape to
the human chin is entirely lacking. Had the teeth been absent it would have
been impossible to diagnose it as human. From a fragment of the symphysis
of the jaw it might well have been classed as some gorilla-like anthropoid,
while the ascending ramus resembles that of some large variety of gibbon.
The absolute certainty that these remains are human is based on the form of
the teeth—molars, premolars, canines, and incisors are all essentially
human and, although somewhat primitive in form, show no trace of being
intermediate between man and the anthropoid apes but rather of being
derived from some older common ancestor. The teeth, however, are
somewhat small for the jaw; the size of the border would allow for the
development of much larger teeth; we can only conclude that no great strain
was put on the teeth, and therefore the powerful development of the bones
of the jaw was not designed for their benefit. The conclusion is that the jaw,
regarded as unquestionably human from the nature of the teeth, ranks not
far from the point of separation between man and the anthropoid apes. In
comparison with the jaws of Neanderthal races, as found at Spy, in
Belgium, and at Krapina, in Croatia, we may consider the Heidelberg jaw as
pre-Neanderthaloid; it is, in fact, a generalized type.

Page 151

Fig. 48. Side view of
Heidelberg jaw (centre)
compared with that of an
orang (right) and of an
Eskimo (left); the latter
an individual of
exceptionally large
proportions.

In a conservative spirit, Schoetensack named the type represented by this
jaw Homo heidelbergensis. Other authors have regarded it as of distinct
generic rank; thus it has been termed Palæoanthropus heidelbergensis by
Bonarelli.(37) The jaw itself is extremely massive; the canine teeth, unlike
those of the anthropoid apes and of the Piltdown race, do not project
beyond the line of the other teeth and were therefore not used as weapons of
offense and defense as in the anthropoids, in which these teeth are
prominently developed as tusks. As noted by Schoetensack, the teeth are not
very massive in proportion to the jaw itself, which is the most powerful
human jaw known, even exceeding the largest Eskimo jaw and indicating a
skull of very massive and primitive character. It resembles that of the ape in
the recession of the chin, hence it has been termed amentalis. There is a
large development of the coronoid process of the mandible for the
attachment of the temporal muscle. This jaw may well have been used as a

Page 152

tool in the last stages of the preparation of hides, as is the practice of the
Eskimo races. We observe that the powerful bony branches of the jaw, when
regarded from above, close in upon the space left for the tongue; in fact, the
bone closes in to such an extent as to interfere seriously with the free use of
the tongue in articulate speech.

Fig. 49. The jaws shown in
Fig. 48 seen from above.
A massive Eskimo jaw
(above), the Heidelberg
jaw (centre), the jaw of
an orang (below).

Page 153

It would seem that in the jaw, and probably in all other characters of the
skull, as they become known, the Heidelberg race will be found to be a
Neanderthal in the making, that is, a primitive, more powerful, and more
ape-like ancestral form. In the matter of the retreating chin, the true
Neanderthals of Spy, Malarnaud, Krapina, and La Chapelle rank exactly
half-way between the most inferior races of recent man and the anthropoid
apes.

Fig. 50. Restoration of the
Man of Heidelberg by
the Belgian artist
Mascré, under the
direction of Professor A.
Rutot, of Brussels. This
restoration presents an
advance upon the
Pithecanthropus type. In
our opinion the
Heidelberg man was

Page 154

more human and less
ape-like in appearance.

Not only among the Eskimos, but generally throughout the savage races of
Australia and of other countries, the jaws are used as tools; among the
Australians the teeth are very much worn down but are in admirable
preservation. When seen from above, we observe that the 'Heidelberg'
grinding-teeth form a perfect arch, or horseshoe-shaped arrangement,
whereas in all the apes the two lines of grinding-teeth are almost parallel
with each other. Thus, while there may be wide differences of opinion as
regards the relationships of the Heidelberg man, all agree that
Schoetensack's discovery affords us one of the great missing links or types
in the chain of human development.
The typical mammalian life of Second Interglacial times as found at
Mosbach and Süssenborn belongs perhaps to a somewhat more recent stage
of Second Interglacial times than that of the 'Mauer sands,' for in these
localities the Etruscan rhinoceros is wanting and the more specialized
broad-nosed rhinoceros is abundant; this animal differs from the Etruscan
form in the possession of relatively long-crowned grinding-teeth, which
were better adapted to grazing habits. On the head were borne two horns. A
variety of the southern mammoth (E. trogontherii) is so highly
characteristic of Second Interglacial times that Pohlig refers to this life
period as the E. trogontherii stage. From the structure of its grinding-teeth it
is regarded as similar in habit to the Asiatic elephant, which now inhabits
the forests of India, but it has the peculiar concave forehead distinctive of
the mammoth and quite unlike the convex forehead of the Indian elephant.
The bears of this period belong to the primitive species U. deningeri and U.
arvernensis, for so far there is no certain record of the presence of the true
brown bear of Europe (U. arctos). The sabre-tooth tiger of this time is
preserved in the caverns of the Pyrenees near Montmaurin, associated with
the remains of the striped hyæna (H. striata), a species which was widely
distributed over western Europe in early Pleistocene times. This species was
contemporary with, and later replaced by, the spotted hyæna (H. crocuta),
from which the very hardy cave-hyæna (H. crocuta spelæa) of the 'Reindeer
Period,' descended. We observe that the 'polycladine' deer of Upper

Page 155

Pliocene and First Glacial times has disappeared from western Europe; nor
are there any traces of the axis deer. The hippopotamus is still represented
by the giant species, H. major.

Early Northern Migrations of the Reindeer
The animals that we have described belong in the warmer and more
temperate regions of Europe. In the regions near the glaciers the reindeer
was already to be found; in fact, this characteristically northern animal is
recorded in the gravels of Süssenborn, near Weimar.
There is evidence of a succession of climatic changes in the region of
Heidelberg. The Heidelberg jaw with its temperate mammalian fauna
occurred at the very base of the Mauer bluff, but higher up the bluff (Fig.
46) on a corresponding level are found the remains of mammals which
indicate a marked lowering of temperature and which are referred by some
authorities to the period of chilling climate that characterized northern
Europe toward the close of Second Interglacial times. The reindeer also
occurs in the 'high terrace' gravels of the River Murr, near Steinheim; thus,
at Mauer, at Süssenborn, and at Steinheim, we find proof that the reindeer
had begun to spread over the colder regions of Europe, and there is some
ground for belief that it found its way even as far south as the Pyrenees.
The evidence of the first cold, arid period which for the time greatly
affected the climate of western Europe is also found in the layer of so-called
'ancient loess' which lies in the bluff above the 'sands of Mauer.' This loess
covers the warm mammalian deposits of the 'sands of Mosbach' as well as
the 'high terraces' of many of the ancient river-valleys. Both in Europe and
America the climatic sequence of the Second Interglacial Stage from moist
to dry appears to have been the same.
Thus, after the recession of the ice-fields of the second glaciation, the
climate was at first cold and moist; then followed a long warm stage,
favorable to the spread of forests; this was finally succeeded by a period of
aridity in which the most ancient 'loess' deposits occurred. In Russia, also,
the third glaciation was preceded by an arid and steppe-like climate with
high winds favorable to the transportation of 'loess.'

Page 156

No palæoliths or other proofs of human occupation have been found in this
cold, dry period, for there is no evidence in any part of Europe of camping
stations in this 'ancient loess' such as we find in the 'loess' which was
deposited during the similar arid period toward the close of Third
Interglacial and again during Postglacial times. Nor have we any record of
the mammalian life in this 'ancient loess' of Europe.

The Third Glaciation[R]
This arid period in northern Europe and in North America was followed by
the moist, cool climate of the third glaciation. It is estimated by Penck that
the advance of these new ice-fields began 120,000 years ago and that the
period of advance and retreat of the glaciers was not less than 20,000 years.
In the Alps the snow-line descended 1,250 metres below the present level;
consequently this glaciation was more severe than the first but somewhat
less severe than the second. In northern Europe the Scandinavian ice-field
did not cover so wide an area as during the second glaciation, although
Britain and Scandinavia were again deeply buried by ice; the glacial cap
and glaciers flowed in a westerly and southwesterly direction across
Denmark and the southern portion of the basin of the Baltic into Holland
and northern Germany. In the Alps the third glaciation sent vast ice-floes
along the valley of the Rhine, into eastern France, and into the valley of the
Po, where this glaciation was even more extensive than the second. But the
greatest glacier of this time was that of the Isar, a southern tributary of the
Danube, which rises in the Bavarian Alps.(38)
During the Third Glacial Stage certain of the 'middle terraces' along the
Rhine and other rivers flowing from the Alps were formed. In Britain,(39)
whereas during the second glaciation the ice-fields extended as far south as
the Thames, during the third glaciation they did not extend beyond the
midlands; yet an arctic climate prevailed over southern England, with
tundra conditions and temperature, as indicated by the plant deposits at
Hoxne(40) in Suffolk. Even before the third glaciation began in Europe a
great ice-cap had formed over Labrador, on the eastern coast of North
America, and the ice-sheets flowing to the south and southwest extended as
far as Illinois, depositing the great Illinoian 'drifts.'

Page 157

Larger Image

Fig. 51. The ice-fields and
glaciers of the Third
Glacial Stage are seen to
be much less extensive
than those of the Second
Glacial Stage, shown in
Fig. 25, p. 65. The
continental depression
and invasion of the sea is
also believed to have
been less extensive. At
this stage there are broad
areas free from ice
between the
Scandinavian, the

Page 158

Alpine, and the Pyrenean
ice-caps. Drawn by C. A.
Reeds, after James
Geikie. (Compare Fig.
13.)

Along the borders of these great ice-fields in both countries a cold and
moist climate prevailed, for a prime condition of glaciation is the heavy
precipitation of snow. In northern Europe, between the great Alpine and
Scandinavian ice-fields of the third glaciation a cold climate undoubtedly
prevailed; in the region of the Neckar River, near Cannstatt, is found a
deposit known as 'mammoth loam,' which Koken believed to be
contemporaneous with the period of the third glaciation, although the
evidence is certainly not convincing.(41) Here are found fossil remains of
the Scandinavian reindeer, also of two very important new arrivals in
Europe from the tundra regions of the far northeast, animals which had
wandered along the southern borders of the Scandinavian ice-sheet from the
tundras of northern Russia and Siberia. This is the first appearance in
western Europe of the woolly mammoth (E. primigenius) and the woolly
rhinoceros (D. antiquitatis). In this 'mammoth loam' there also occur two
species of horse, the giant deer (Megaceros), the stag, the wisent, and the
Aurochs. If the woolly mammoth and the woolly rhinoceros actually
entered eastern Germany at this time, they certainly retreated to the north
with the approach of the warm temperate climate of the Third Interglacial
Stage, because no trace of these animals has been found again in Europe
until the advent of the fourth glaciation.

(1) Gaudry, 1890.1.
(2) Smith, G. E., 1912.1, p. 582.
(3) Op. cit.
(4) Munro, 1893.1.

Page 159

(5) Osborn, 1910.1, pp. 306, 307.
(6) Geikie, J., 1894.1, pp. 329-336; 1914.1, p. 227.
(7) Dawkins, 1883.1, pp. 576-579.
(8) Geikie, J., 1914.1, p. 248.
(9) Reid, C., 1908.1.
(10) Desnoyers, 1863.1.
(11) Haug, 1911.1, p. 1807.
(12) Geikie, J., 1894.1, p. 682; 1914.1, p. 250.
(13) Dubois, 1894.1.
(14) Fischer, 1913.1.
(15) Schwalbe, 1899.1; 1914.1.
(16) Büchner, 1914.1.
(17) Volz, 1907.1.
(18) Elbert, 1908.1.
(19) Selenka, 1911.1.
(20) Pilgrim, 1913.1.
(21) Schwalbe, 1899.1, pp. 227, 228.
(22) Op. cit., p. 223.
(23) Schwalbe, 1914.1, pp. 601-606.
(24) Büchner, 1914.1, p. 129.
(25) Dubois, 1894.1, p. 14.
(26) Keith, 1912.1.
(27) Smith, G. E., 1912.1, p. 595.

Page 160

(28) Op. cit.
(29) Rutot, 1907.1.
(30) Boule, 1913.1, pp. 266, 267.
(31) MacCurdy, 1905.1, pp. 468, 469.
(32) Geikie, J., 1914.1, p. 251.
(33) Op. cit., p. 255.
(34) Op. cit., p. 238.
(35) Schoetensack, 1908.1.
(36) Op. cit., pp. 25-43.
(37) Bonarelli, 1909.1.
(38) Penck, 1909.1.
(39) Geikie, J., 1914.1, p. 258.
(40) Op. cit., pp. 257-262.
(41) Schmidt, 1912.1, p. 181.

Page 161

CHAPTER II
ARRIVAL OF THE PRE-CHELLEAN
FLINT WORKERS DURING THE
THIRD INTERGLACIAL—
GEOGRAPHY, CLIMATE, AND THE
RIVER DRIFTS—PRE-CHELLEAN
FLINT INDUSTRY—THE
PILTDOWN RACE—MAMMALIAN
LIFE—CHELLEAN AND
ACHEULEAN INDUSTRIES—THE
USE OF FIRE—THE SECOND
PERIOD OF ARID CLIMATE—THE
NEANDERTHAL RACE OF
KRAPINA, CROATIA
The geologic epoch of the arrival of the Pre-Chellean flint workers in
western Europe is by far the most important and interesting one before the
prehistorian. Upon it depends the question of the duration of the Old Stone
Age, the date of appearance of the Piltdown and of the Neanderthal races,
and the whole sequence of climatic and geographic changes surrounding the
early history of man. After weighing all the evidence very carefully, the
balance of opinion seems to sustain the view that this epoch should be
placed after the close of the third glaciation and before the advent of the
fourth, that is, during the Third Interglacial Stage.
Penck estimated that the third warm interglacial stage[S] opened about
100,000 years ago and lasted between 50,000 and 60,000 years. According
to the theory that we have adopted in this work, the Third Interglacial and
Fourth Glacial embraced the entire period of Lower Palæolithic time, a
period of from 70,000 to 100,000 years, much longer than that of Upper
Palæolithic time, which is estimated at 16,000 to 25,000 years.

Geologic Antiquity of the Beginning of the Stone Age

Page 162

Attention should first be called to the fact that, preceding the epoch we have
now entered, the glacial and interglacial forces operating over the great
peninsula of western Europe had left their impress chiefly on the glaciated
areas and only to a minor degree on the free, non-glaciated areas. Until
toward the close of Third Interglacial times no traces of northern much less
of arctic forests and animals are discovered anywhere, except along the
borders of the ice-fields. It would appear as if the animal and plant life of
Europe were, in the main, but slightly affected by the first three glaciations.
We cannot entertain for a moment the belief that in glacial times all the
warm flora and fauna migrated southward and then returned, because there
is not a shred of evidence for this theory. It is far more in accord with the
known facts to believe that all the southern and eastern forms of life had
become very hardy, for we know how readily animals now living in the
warm earth belts are acclimatized to northern conditions.

Larger Image

Fig. 52. Human types and
culture stages of the last

Page 163

third of the Glacial
Epoch. Theoretic
estimates of the geologic
and time divisions and
introduction of human
races during the Third
Interglacial, Fourth
Glacial, and Postglacial
Stages (see Fig. 14, p.
41). Prepared by the
author with the aid of C.
A. Reeds.

If, on the other hand, we depend solely on the testimony of the life
conditions, we might conclude that the Pre-Chellean flint workers reached
western Europe either in Second Interglacial times, or during the third
glaciation, or again during Third Interglacial times. Let us consider this
evidence of the fossil mammals more closely.

Page 164

Larger Image

Fig. 53. Distribution of the
principal Pre-Chellean
and Chellean industrial
stations in western
Europe.

In favor of the theory that the Pre-Chellean culture is as ancient as Second
Interglacial times, we should consider the fact that in several localities
palæoliths of Pre-Chellean if not of Chellean type have been recorded in
association with the remains of a number of the more primitive mammals
which we have described above as characteristic of Second Interglacial
times. For example, at Torralba, Province of Soria, Spain, there has been
discovered(1) an old typical Chellean camp site, containing abundant
remains of the broad-nosed rhinoceros and of the southern mammoth,
mingled with the remains of other mammals of very ancient type, identified

Page 165

as the Etruscan rhinoceros and as Steno's horse. Again, along the River
Somme, near Abbeville, in the gisement du Champ de Mars,(2) it is said that
Pre-Chellean and Chellean implements have been found in association with
the Etruscan rhinoceros, Steno's horse, and very numerous specimens of the
sabre-tooth tiger and of the striped hyæna. Moreover, in Piltdown, Sussex,
Pre-Chellean flints and the Piltdown skull are said to have occurred in a
layer containing a rhinoceros which may be identified with the Etruscan. If
these very ancient species of animals are rightly recognized and determined,
and if they are truly found as reported in close association in the same
layers with Pre-Chellean and Chellean flints, the evidence may be
considered as quite strong that the beginning of Chellean culture dates from
Second Interglacial times; unless, indeed, it should prove that these
primitive species of mammals survived into Third Interglacial times in
certain favored districts. We should also consider the possibility that these
more ancient animals, the sabre-tooth tiger, Steno's horse, the Etruscan
rhinoceros, and the giant beaver, did not really belong in the same layer
with these old palæoliths but were accidentally washed into this layer from
other more ancient deposits. As a rule, it is the most recent animals which
establish a prehistoric date, because we know that a palæolith cannot be
older than the most recent mammal with which it occurs.

Page 166

Larger Image

Fig. 54. Western Europe
during the extension of
the ice-fields and
glaciers (dots) of the
Third Glacial Stage—a
period of continental
depression believed to
have been less extensive
than that of the Second
Glacial Stage (see Fig.
25, p. 65). The line from
Scandinavia to northern
Africa corresponds to the
section shown in Fig. 13,
p. 37. Drawn by C. A.
Reeds, after Geikie and
Penck. (Compare Fig.
13.)

Page 167

Fig. 55. Excavation at
Chelles-sur-Marne, the
Palæolithic station where
Chellean flint
implements were first
discovered. We observe
the very close, regular,
and unbroken succession
of the geological layers
containing the Chellean,
Acheulean, and
Mousterian flints.

The record of the three early glaciations is not fully written in the animal
and plant life, but it appears to be found in the river channels. Both in
England and France these channels attest flooded conditions during the

Page 168

earlier glaciations, in which large quantities of gravels and sands were
transported, and it is of these materials that the 'high terraces' were built up.
It is chiefly the geologic evidence which establishes the Pre-Chellean date.
Geologic and climatic lines of evidence in France indicate that the Pre-
Chellean culture is first witnessed during the beginning of Third Interglacial
times. This is the opinion of Boule, Haug, Obermaier, Breuil, Schmidt, and
many other geologists and archæologists. That the first Palæolithic flint
workers found their way into western Europe during the early part of Third
Interglacial times is consistent with our observations on the sequence of
climate, on the formation of the 'low river terraces,' where palæoliths of the
earliest type occur, as well as with the general succession of mammalian life
throughout the climatic changes of this interglacial period. It would appear,
in explanation of the facts cited above regarding the fossil mammals, that
when the Pre-Chellean flint workers established their camps along the
valley of the River Somme in northern France a very genial climate
prevailed in this region, favorable even, as we shall see, to the survival of
some of the Pliocene types of mammals, such as the sabre-tooth tiger and
the Etruscan rhinoceros.
During the early part of the Third Interglacial Stage the climate, so far as we
can judge by the unchanged aspect of the animal life, remained of the same
warm temperate character. Two only of the surviving Pliocene forms,
namely, the sabre-tooth tigers and the Etruscan rhinoceroses, became rare or
extinct. From evidence afforded in Kent's Hole, Devonshire, Dawkins is led
to believe that the sabre-tooth tiger survived in Britain until Postglacial
times. All the rest of the animal world, both the African-Asiatic and the
Eurasiatic mammals, continued to flourish throughout western Europe.
Not until the latter part of Acheulean times do we discover proofs of a
decided change of climate; in the approach of arid conditions similar to
those of the steppes of western Asia there was a renewal of the great dust-
storms and depositions of 'loess,' such as had previously occurred toward
the close of Second Interglacial times; this was followed by the still colder
climate of the fourth glaciation, which corresponds with the closing period
of Lower Palæolithic culture.

Page 169

The evolution of the Pre-Chellean into the Chellean and finally into the
Lower Acheulean palæoliths certainly occupied a very long period of time
if we assign it merely the 50,000 or 60,000 years allotted to the Third
Interglacial; but even this allotment seems far too long when we observe the
relatively limited depth of the river deposits in which these flint cultures
succeed each other. For we cannot fail to be impressed by the regular and
very close and unbroken succession of the geologic layers containing the
Chellean and Acheulean artifacts. (See Fig. 55.)
None the less it follows that a long lapse of time must be allowed for each
culture period, and for the advance in technique.(3) It is this wide
distribution that has enabled the de Mortillets (father and son), Capitan,
Rivière, Reboux, Daleau, Peyrony, Obermaier, Commont, Schmidt, and
others to establish in various parts of Europe the main stages of the
industrial evolution of the Old Stone Age, or Lower Palæolithic.

Subdivisions of the Lower Palæolithic Cultures(4)[T]
Mousterian. Late industry of the Neanderthal races. Extensive
use of the 'flake.'
Late Mousterian. La Quina scrapers, small 'coups de
poing,' and bone anvils, closing with the Abri
Audit culture.
Middle Mousterian. Culmination of the Mousterian
'point' finely flaked and chipped on one side, the
best examples approaching the Solutrean
perfection of technique.
Early Mousterian. Heart-shaped 'coups de poing' and
Mousterian flake 'points' and flake scrapers.
Acheulean. Early industry of the Neanderthal races. Extensive
use of the nodular core.
Late Acheulean. Miniature 'lance points' of La
Micoque type, triangular 'coups de poing,' and

Page 170

flint flakes of Levallois type.
Middle Acheulean. Pointed oval 'coups de poing,'
much lighter than the Chellean types, and small
implements similar to the Chellean but much
improved in workmanship.
Early Acheulean. Broad oval 'coups de poing' much
more symmetrical than the Chellean but still
rather heavy. Small types.
Chellean.
Late Chellean. Long pointed 'coups de poing,' in most
cases flaked on both sides, with little of the crust
of the nodule adhering and the edges still
unsymmetrical. First appearance of the oval
'coups de poing.'
Early Chellean. First appearance of 'coups de poing' of
almond shape. Small implements, including
scrapers, planes, and borers. All implements
unsymmetrical and with uneven edges.
Pre-Chellean. Probable industry of the Piltdown and of the
(Pre-Neanderthaloid) Heidelberg races. Use of chance and
accidental forms. Forms partly accidental; retouch limited
to the few strokes necessary to give a point or edge to the
tool, or to allow a firm grasp (protective retouch).
Prototypes of 'coup de poing' formed of flint nodules with
crust only partially removed.
If we suppose that the Pre-Chellean flint workers arrived in Europe not
earlier than Third Interglacial times, we can explain all the gradations in the
evolution of their implements in connection with the changes of climate and
of animal life which the geologic and fossil deposits reveal, especially in
the valleys of the Somme and of the Thames.
If, on the other hand, the Pre-Chellean is dated in Second Interglacial times,
[U] it carries this culture back another hundred thousand years and involves

Page 171

our prehistory in great difficulties. First, there is no proof whatever that the
Pre-Chellean and Chellean flint workers lived during the period of the
formation of the 'high river terraces' of the third glaciation, for no
Palæolithic flints have ever been found buried in the sands or gravels of the
'high terraces.' The occurrence of archaic flints on the 'high terraces' of the
Somme and of the Seine is in superficial gravel beds which were deposited
long after these 'terraces' had been cut by river action; this is best seen in
the Somme, where archaic flints occur alike in the gravels deposited upon
the 'low,' 'middle,' and 'high terraces.' Second, there is no proof that the Pre-
Chellean and Chellean flint workers passed through the cold climatic period
of the third glaciation; nowhere in Europe have any records been found of
their camps or stations in association with the cold fauna or flora of Third
Glacial times. Third, the geographical evidence is equally at variance with
the theory that the Pre-Chellean flint workers entered Europe during the
Second Interglacial Stage, for we know positively that in many of the great
river-valleys of Europe, especially those surrounding the Alps, the rivers
were at much higher levels than at present and that they were transporting
the materials out of which the 'high terraces' were being formed or cutting
these 'terraces' down by erosion.
In other words, the geography of Europe in First and Second Interglacial
times was very different from what it is at present; most of the river-valleys
were broader and less deep; some of them had been eroded to a point below
their present levels and had begun to silt up in alluvial deposits. In Third
Interglacial times the river geography of Europe was substantially as it is to-
day, although the coast-lines were still very different.
When Pre-Chellean man appeared, we shall see that the river-valleys of the
Somme and Marne, in northern France, as well as of the Thames, in
southeastern England, were closely similar to what they are at present in
respect to their water-levels; in other words, the inland geography of Europe
in the north in Chellean times and in central and southern France in the
immediately succeeding Acheulean times was very much like it is at
present. The superficial characters of the valleys were different; the streams
in Chellean times flowed through gravels and sands, partaking of a glacial
aspect; one or more of the 'river terraces' composed of sands and gravels
were still sharply defined, for the soft covering of 'loam' and alluvial soil
from the surrounding uplands and hills had not yet washed down to soften

Page 172

the outlines of the 'terraces.' Neither were the 'terraces' covered with the
newer deposits of 'loess.'

Larger Image

Fig. 56. Restoration of the
geography of western
Europe during the Third
Interglacial Stage,
showing the ancient land
areas (dots) and the
ancient river channels
now submerged by the
sea. Modified after

Page 173

Avebury's Prehistoric
Times by permission of
Henry Holt & Co. The
six white crosses (X)
indicate the location of
the principal Pre-
Chellean stations of
Piltdown on the Ouse,
and Gray's Thurrock on
the Thames, in England;
of Abbeville, on the
north bank, and St.
Acheul, on the south
bank of the Somme, and
Chelles on the Marne, in
France; and of Helin in
Belgium. It will be
observed that the English
stations are separated
from the others only by
the ancient broad valley
corresponding with the
present English Channel.

Secular Changes of Climate in Lower Palæolithic Times
We find evidences of four climatic and life phases during the long period of
Lower Palæolithic evolution, as follows:
4. Cold Moist Climate.—Advent of the fourth glaciation. Arrival
of the 'full Mousterian' culture and of the Neanderthal race in
Belgium and France. Repair of men to the warmer shelters,
grottos, and entrances to the caverns. Final disappearance of the
hardy Merck's rhinoceros and the straight-tusked elephant.
Arrival of the tundra fauna, the reindeer, the woolly mammoth,
and the woolly rhinoceros. Refrigeration of western Europe as

Page 174

far south as northern Spain and Italy. Wide distribution of cold
alpine, tundra, and steppe mammals all over Germany and
France, and into northern Spain. Cold tundra flora in the Thames
valley, and at Hoxne, in Suffolk. Migration of the tundra
mammals, the reindeer, mammoth, and rhinoceros all over
southern Britain, Belgium, France, Germany, and Austria.
3. Arid Climate in Western Europe.—Period of the close of the
Acheulean culture; some of the flint workers seeking the shelter
of cliffs and approaching the entrances to the grottos during the
cold season of the year. A dry steppe climate, prevailing
westerly winds, and deposits of 'loess' all over northern France
and Germany. Appearance of the first Neanderthaloid men in
Krapina, Croatia. Cool forest flora in the region of La Celle-
sous-Moret near Paris, followed by depositions of 'loess' and
increasingly cool and arid climate. Early Mousterian industry.
Disappearance first of the more sensitive pair of Asiatic
mammals, the hippopotamus and the southern mammoth (E.
trogontherii); persistence of the more hardy, straight-tusked
elephant (E. antiquus) and the broad-nosed rhinoceros (D.
merckii).
2. Continued Warm Temperate Period.—Time of the Chellean
culture found at Chelles, St. Acheul, Gray's Thurrock, Ilford,
Essex, and southward in Torralba, Spain. Abundance of
hippopotami, rhinoceroses, southern mammoths, and straight-
tusked elephants in northern Germany at Taubach, Weimar,
Ehringsdorf, and Achenheim. Rare appearance of sabre-tooth
tigers. Temperate forest and alpine flora of Dürnten and
Utznach, Switzerland. Early Acheulean culture widely
distributed over all of western Europe.
1. Early Warm Temperate Period.—The warm climate of the
Pre-Chellean culture period, as seen in the valleys of the
Somme, of the Thames, and of the Seine near Paris, favorable to
the southern mammoth and the hippopotamus. Apparent survival
of the sabre-tooth tiger and the Etruscan rhinoceros in favored
regions. A warm temperate forest flora in La Cellesous-Moret

Page 175

near Paris and in Lorraine. Arrival of the Pre-Chellean flint
workers and of the Piltdown race in southern England.
It is believed that the climate of Third Interglacial times when it reached its
maximum warmth was again somewhat milder than the present climate in
the same region. In the Alps the glaciers and the snow-line retreated once
more to their present levels. The period opened with humid continental
conditions. The areas left bare by the ice were gradually reforested. A
picture of the climate in this warm period is presented in the region near
Paris in the so-called tuf de La Celle-sous-Moret (Seine-et-Marne). This
tufa, which is a hot-springs deposit, overlies river-gravels of Pleistocene
age.(7) The lower levels of the tufa contain the sycamore-maple (Acer
pseudoplatanus), willows, and the Austrian pine, indicating a temperate
climate. Higher up in the same deposits we find evidences of increasingly
mild temperatures in the presence of the box (Buxus) and not infrequently
of the fig-tree; the Canary laurel (Laurus nobilis) is somewhat rarer and
both it and the fig indicate that the winters were mild, because these plants
have the peculiarity of flowering during the winter season; we infer,
therefore, that the climate was somewhat milder and more damp than it is in
the same region at the present time. The mollusks also indicate greater
equability of climate. These deposits are believed to correspond with the
period of Chellean and early Acheulean industry.
The plants in the highest levels of the same tufa, however, indicate the
advent of a colder climate and also connect this with the Acheulean culture
stage through the presence of Acheulean flints. The deposit of tufa is
covered by a sheet of 'loess' corresponding with the return of an arid period
in late Acheulean times, in the very heart of northern France. Thus we have
a record in the region near the present city of Paris of three climatic phases,
which are also more or less completely indicated in deposits to the north
along the River Somme and in the valley of the ancient Thames.
In western France we again interpret the fossil flora of Lorraine as
belonging to the cooler closing period of Third Interglacial times and to the
advent of the fourth glaciation, for here the most northern varieties of the
larch (Larix) and of the mountain-pine (Pinus lambertiana) predominate.

Page 176

The clearest view of the contemporary alpine forests is found near Zürich in
the lignitic deposits of Dürnten and of Utznach, which are so characteristic
of the temperate period of the Third Interglacial Stage that Geikie has
proposed to call this stage the Dürntenian.(8) It was, we recall, at Dürnten
that Morlot(9) found the first proofs of a warm or temperate interglacial
flora, between the deposits of a retreating glacier and those of an advancing
glacier; for Dürnten is well within the region which was covered by the vast
ice-fields both of the third and fourth glaciations. The forests which
flourished there in Third Interglacial times were similar to those now found
in the same region, consisting of the spruce, fir, mountain-pine, larch,
beech, yew, and sycamore, with undergrowth of hazel. With this hardy flora
are associated the remains of the straight-tusked elephant, of Merck's
rhinoceros, of wild cattle, and of the stag; another evidence for our opinion
that all these Asiatic mammals had become habituated to the cool temperate
climate of the north.

Life on the River Somme from Pre-Chellean to Neolithic Times
The borders of the River Somme at St. Acheul give us a vista of the whole
story of the succession of geologic events; the great changes of climate, the
procession of animal life, the sequence of human races and cultures. Here
Commont(10) has found the key to the history of this entire country and
enabled us to parallel events here with those occurring far away in Taubach,
on the borders of the Thuringian forest, and at Krems in Lower Austria, as
studied by Obermaier. This is because the 'older' and 'newer' loess periods,
the succession of climates and of mammals, and the development of human
cultures were all not local but continental events. The purely local events
are found in the kinds of gravels and soils which washed down over the
terraces.
It is very important first to clearly picture in our minds and understand the
geography of the Somme at the time of the arrival of the Pre-Chellean flint
workers. It appears certain that all three of the old river terraces composed
of limestone had been cut long before and that the river had already reached
the bottom level of the underlying chalk rock.(11) The higher terrace, then as
now, was 100 feet above the Somme, the middle terrace about 70 feet, and

Page 177

the lowest terrace extended from a height of about 40 feet down underneath
the present river level (see Fig. 59).

Larger Image

Fig. 57. Three ancient river
terraces (I, II, III), on the
west bank of the
Connecticut River in
Vermont, believed to be
of Postglacial age. The
terraces are respectively
140, 60, and 20 feet
above the river, and thus
show a profile similar to
that of the terraces on the
Somme in Pre-Chellean
times previous to the
accumulation of the
deposits bearing
Palæolithic flints.
Photograph by H. H. H.
Langill.

Page 178

Since the most primitive Pre-Chellean flints occur in the coarse gravels
which lie on the floors of these terraces immediately above the chalk, they
prove that the entire excavation of the valley had been completed when the
Pre-Chellean workers arrived there. Commont believes that this was the
actual topography of the valley during the Third Interglacial Stage. The
occurrence of Chellean flints in the white sands overlying the coarse gravels
of the middle and upper terraces does not indicate that the flint workers
were encamped here while these terraces were being cut out by the River
Somme but rather that they sought these convenient bluffs for their quarries
during the time that these sands and gravels were washing down from the
sides of the valleys and from the plateaus above.

Page 179

Fig. 58. Four typical forms of
the Chellean coup de
poing, or 'hand-stone,'
from the ancient quarries
of St. Acheul. About
one-half actual size.
a. Disc-shaped—upper left.
b. Oval—upper right.
c. Poniard-shaped—lower
left.
d. Almond-shaped—lower
right.
In the collection of the
American Museum of Natural
History.

Larger Image

Fig. 59. Section of the ancient
river terraces on the
south bank of the River

Page 180

Somme at St. Acheul-
Amiens, showing
stations on the low,
middle, and high terraces
where flints were worked
from the very beginning
to the very end of the
Old Stone Age. After
Commont, 1908, 1909—
modified and redrawn.
The section shown runs
northwest and southeast,
in a gentle slope nearly
1½ miles in length, from
the summit, 70 meters
(about 230 feet) above
sea-level, down to the
river 47.3 meters (155
feet) below. Since
Rigollot's excavations in
1851 sixteen flint-
working stations have
been discovered here,
chiefly through building
operations, most of them
being on the middle and
high terraces. This gives
some idea of the vast
extent of these ancient
encampments, which
cover the entire period of
the Old Stone Age—
perhaps 125,000 years.

Prehistory of St. Acheul

Page 181

NEOLITHIC.
Campignian, recent earth and loam.
UPPER PALÆOLITHIC.
Solutrean.
Upper Aurignacian, loam.
Middle Aurignacian, 'newer loess' and gravel.
LOWER PALÆOLITHIC.
Late Mousterian, gravel and 'newer loess.'
Early Mousterian, base of 'newer loess' (l'ergeron).
Middle Acheulean, 'older loess' and drift.
Early Acheulean, gravels below 'older loess' (E. antiquus).
Late Chellean, fluviatile sands and mollusk fauna.
Early Chellean, first coups de poing; old 'white sands' (E. antiquus).
Pre-Chellean, prototypes of coup de poing; old 'lower gravels' (E.
antiquus).
The history of the climatic changes in the ancient valley of the Somme is
most clearly written in these successive deposits, 15 feet in thickness, above
the 'lower gravels' at St. Acheul. Along with the Pre-Chellean and Chellean
flints in the 'old gravels' and 'white sands' we find records of the moist
warm temperate climate which then prevailed in northern France and which
undoubtedly was most favorable to the hippopotami, rhinoceroses, and
elephants of those times. The river mollusks found with the late Chellean
flints are another indication of the temperate forest climate which continued
through early Acheulean times.
In the middle Acheulean are found the earliest deposits of 'older loess'
which indicate a climate still temperate but arid, belonging to the middle of
the Third Interglacial Stage. In Mousterian times we find heavy deposits of
gravels corresponding to the moist cold climate of the Fourth Glacial Stage,
followed in middle Aurignacian times by fresh layers of 'newer loess,'
indicating the return of a dry climate. Finally, the layers of loam which were
washed down over the sides of the valley, and in which the remains of
Solutrean and Aurignacian camps are found, indicate the renewal of moist
and probably forested conditions.

Page 182

Thus, two dry loess periods are indicated in this valley, the first or 'older
loess' belonging to Third Interglacial times, and the second or 'newer loess'
to Postglacial times; and we clearly perceive that in the culture layers here
there is no evidence whatever of more than one glacial stage preceded by a
dry climatic period and deposits of loess. If the Pre-Chellean flint workers
had arrived in this river-valley as early as Second Interglacial times, we
should find proofs of three periods of arid climate and loess deposition and
of two glaciations.
Beginning with middle Acheulean times the flints are found in deposits of
gravels, loams, brick-earths, and 'older loess,' which all belong to a
succeeding geologic stage and are of more recent date than the lower
gravels and sands on the terraces which they overlap and conceal. Deposits
of this kind have also been drifted down from the highest levels toward the
bottom of the valley, and Commont distinguishes three different depositions
or layers of 'loess loam,' the lowest or oldest of which contain Acheulean
flints, while the middle loams contain Mousterian implements.
Even toward the close of the Third Interglacial Stage there were periods of
warmth, perhaps during the height of the hot summer season, when animals
of the warm fauna migrated from the south. Thus Commont has recently
discovered in the valley of the Somme a station of Mousterian flint workers,
whose industry is associated with remains of the three animals typical of the
warmer climatic phase; namely, the straight-tusked elephant, the broad-
nosed rhinoceros, and the hippopotamus. He has reaffirmed his belief that
the greater part of this chapter of human prehistory, both as to the surface
topography of the Somme valley and the evolution of the flint cultures from
Pre-Chellean to Mousterian times, occurred during the Third Interglacial
Stage.

The Early Warm Temperate Period of the Pre-Chellean Culture[V]
Pre-Chellean Fauna
Southern mammoth.
Etruscan rhinoceros.
Hippopotamus.

Page 183

Primitive horse (Equus stenonis)?
Sabre-tooth tiger.
Broad-nosed rhinoceros.
Straight-tusked elephant.
Giant beaver (Trogontherium cuvieri).
Short-faced hyæna.
Typical Eurasiatic forest and meadow fauna, including deer, bison, and
wild cattle.
We have observed that from Torralba in the Province of Soria, Spain, to
Abbeville, near the mouth of the Somme, in the north of France, three types
of animals which entered Europe as early as Upper Pliocene times, namely,
the Etruscan rhinoceros, the horse of Steno, and the sabre-tooth tiger, are
said to occur in connection with early Chellean artifacts. The two former
species may possibly be confused with early forms of Merck's rhinoceros
and the true forest horses of Europe, but there can be no question as to the
identification of the sabre-tooth tiger, numbers of which were found by M.
d'Ault du Mesnil, at Abbeville, on the Somme, with early Chellean flints.
The mammalian life of the Somme at this time, as found in the gisement du
Champ de Mars near Abbeville, is very rich. Among the larger forms there
is certainly the great southern mammoth (E. meridionalis trogontherii), and
possibly also the straight-tusked elephant (E. antiquus). There are
unquestionably two species of rhinoceros, the smaller of which is
recognized by Boule as the Etruscan, and the larger as Merck's rhinoceros.
Steno's horse is said to occur here, and there are abundant remains of the
great hippopotamus (H. major); the sabre-tooth tigers were very numerous
as attested by the discovery of the lower jaws of thirty or more individuals.
The short-faced hyæna (H. brevirostris) is also found, and there are several
species of deer and wild cattle.
This remarkably rich collection of mammals is associated with flints of
primitive Chellean or, possibly, of Pre-Chellean type.(12) In Torralba, Spain,
the same very ancient animals occur, and it appears possible that this was
the prevailing mammalian life of Pre-Chellean times.
We may conclude, therefore, that there is considerable evidence, although
not as yet quite convincing, that the early Chellean flint workers arrived in

Page 184

western Europe before the disappearance of the Etruscan rhinoceros and the
sabre-tooth tiger.

The Pre-Chellean Stations
(See Figs. 53 and 56.)
The dawn of the Palæolithic Age is indicated in various river-drift stations
by the appearance of crude flint weapons as well as tools or implements, in
addition to the supposed tools of Eolithic times. There is an unmistakable
effort to fashion the flint into a definite shape to serve a definite purpose:
there can no longer be any question of human handiwork. Thus there
gradually arise various types of flints, each of which undergoes its own
evolution into a more perfect form. Naturally, the workers at some stations
were more adept and inventive than at others. Nevertheless, the primitive
stages of invention and of technique were carried from station to station;
and thus for the first time we are enabled to establish the archæological age
of various stations in western Europe.
Only a few stations have been discovered where the Palæolithic men were
first fashioning their flints into prototypes of the Chellean and Acheulean
forms. With relation to the theory that these primitive flint workers may
have entered Europe by way of the northern coast of Africa, we observe that
these stations are confined to Spain, southern and northern France,
Belgium, and Great Britain. Neither Pre-Chellean nor Chellean stations of
unquestioned authenticity have been found in Germany or central Europe,
and, so far as present evidence goes, it would appear that the Pre-Chellean
culture did not enter Europe directly from the east, or even along the
northern coast of the Mediterranean, but rather along the northern coast of
Africa,[W] where Chellean culture is recorded in association with
mammalian remains belonging to the middle Pleistocene Epoch.
The southernmost stations of Chellean culture at present known in Europe
are those of Torralba and San Isidro, in central Spain. In the Department of
the Gironde is the Chellean station of Marignac, and it is not unlikely that
other stations will be discovered in the same region, because the Palæolithic
races strongly favored the valleys of the Dordogne and Garonne, but thus

Page 185

far this is the only station known in southern France which represents this
period of the dawn of human culture.

Fig. 60. Very primitive
palæoliths from
Piltdown, Sussex,
consisting chiefly of
tools and points of
triangular and oval form,
fashioned out of flint
nodules split in two and
flaked on one side only,
with very coarse
marginal retouch. After
Dawson. Nos. 1 and 2
are nearly one-half actual

Page 186

size; No. 3 nearly one-
quarter actual size.

The chief Pre-Chellean and Chellean stations were clustered along the
valleys of the Somme and Seine. Of those rare sites presenting a typical
Pre-Chellean culture, we may note the neighboring stations of St. Acheul
and Montières, both in the suburbs of Amiens on the Somme, and the
station of Helin, near Spiennes, in Belgium, explored by Rutot. A very
primitive and possibly Pre-Chellean culture was found on the site of the
Champ de Mars, at Abbeville. This culture also extended westward across
the broad plain which is now the Strait of Dover to the valley of the
Thames, on whose northern bank is the important station of Gray's
Thurrock, while farther to the south is the recently discovered site of
Piltdown, in the valley of the Ouse, Sussex.
The flint tools (Fig. 60) found in the layer immediately overlying the
Piltdown skull are excessively primitive and indicate that the Piltdown flint
workers had not attained the stage of craftsmanship described by Commont
as 'Pre-Chellean' at St. Acheul. "Among the flints," observes Dawson, "we
found several undoubted flint implements besides numerous 'eoliths.' The
workmanship of the former is similar to that of the Chellean or Pre-
Chellean stage; but in the majority of the Piltdown specimens the work
appears chiefly on one face of the implements."

Page 187

Fig. 61. Primitive coups de
poing or 'hand-stones' of
Pre-Chellean type, found
in the lower gravels of
the middle and high
terraces at St. Acheul.
After Commont. One-
quarter actual size.

In the Helin quarry near Spiennes(13) occur rude prototypes of the
Palæolithic coup de poing associated with numerous flakes which do not
greatly differ from those in the lowest river-gravels of St. Acheul; there is a
close correspondence in the workmanship of the two sites, so that we may
regard the Mesvinian of Rutot[X] as a culture stage equivalent to the Pre-
Chellean. The river-gravels and sands of Helin which contain the
implements also resemble those of St. Acheul in their order of stratification.
Of special interest is the fact that a primitive flint from this Helin quarry,
known as the 'borer,' is strikingly similar to the 'Eolithic' borer found in the

Page 188

same layer with the Piltdown skull in Sussex. By such indications as this,
when strengthened by further evidence of the same kind, we may be able
eventually to establish the date both of this Pre-Chellean or Mesvinian
culture and of the Piltdown race.
In considering the Pre-Chellean implements found at St. Acheul in 1906, we
note(14) that at this dawning stage of human invention the flint workers were
not deliberately designing the form of their implements but were dealing
rather with the chance shapes of shattered blocks of flint, seeking with a
few well-directed blows to produce a sharp point or a good cutting edge.
This was the beginning of the art of 'retouch,' which was done by means of
light blows with a second stone instead of the hammer-stone with which the
rough flakes were first knocked off. The retouch served a double purpose:
Its first and most important object was further to sharpen the point or edge
of the tool. This was done by chipping off small flakes from the upper side,
so as to give the flint a saw-like edge. Its second object was to protect the
hand of the user by blunting any sharp edges or points which might prevent
a firm grip of the implement. Often the smooth, rounded end of the flint
nodule, with crust intact, is carefully preserved for this purpose (Fig. 61). It
is this grasping of the primitive tool by the hand to which the terms 'coup de
poing,' 'Faustkeil,' and 'hand-axe' refer. 'Hand-stone' is, perhaps, the most
fitting designation in our language, but it appears best to retain the original
French designation, coup de poing.

Page 189

Fig. 62. Primitive grattoir, or
planing tool (side and
edge views), of Pre-
Chellean type, found in
the lowest gravels of the
terraces at St. Acheul.
After Commont. One-
quarter actual size.

As the shape of the flint is purely due to chance, these Pre-Chellean
implements are interpreted by archæologists chiefly according to the
manner of retouch they have received. Already they are adapted to quite a
variety of purposes, both as weapons of the chase and for trimming and
shaping wooden implements and dressing hides. Thus Obermaier observes
that the concave, serrated edges characteristic of some of these implements
may well have been used for scraping the bark from branches and
smoothing them down into poles; that the rough coups de poing would be
well adapted to dividing flesh and dressing hides; that the sharp-pointed
fragments could be used as borers, and others that are clumsier and heavier
as planes (see Fig. 62).

Page 190

The inventory of these ancestral Pre-Chellean forms of implements, used in
industrial and domestic life, in the chase, and in war, is as follows:
Grattoir, planing tool.
Racloir, scraper.
Perçoir, drill, borer.
Couteau, knife.
Percuteur, hammer-stone.
Pierre de jet? throwing stone?
Prototypes of coup de poing, hand-stone.
It includes five, possibly six, chief types. The true coup de poing, a
combination tool of Chellean times, is not yet developed in the Pre-
Chellean, and the other implements, although similar in form, are more
primitive. They are all in an experimental stage of development.
Indications that this primitive industry spread over southeastern England as
well, and that a succession of Pre-Chellean into Chellean culture may be
demonstrated, occur in connection with the recent discovery of the very
ancient Piltdown race.

The Piltdown Race(15)
The 'dawn man' is the most ancient human type in which the form of the
head and size of the brain are known. Its anatomy, as well as its geologic
antiquity, is therefore of profound interest and worthy of very full
consideration. We may first review the authors' narrative of this remarkable
discovery and the history of opinion concerning it.
Piltdown, Sussex, lies between two branches of the Ouse, about 35 miles
south and slightly to the east of Gray's Thurrock, the Chellean station of the
Thames. To the east is the plateau of Kent, in which many flints of Eolithic
type have been found.

Page 191

Fig. 63. Discovery site of the
famous Piltdown skull
near Piltdown, Sussex.
After Dawson. A shallow
pit of dark-brown gravel,
at the bottom of which
were found the
fragments of the skull
and a single primitive
implement of worked
flint (see Fig. 65).

The gravel layer in which the Piltdown skull occurred is situated on a well-
defined plateau of large area and lies about 80 feet above the level of the
main stream of the Ouse. Remnants of the flint-bearing gravels and drifts
occur upon the plateau and the slopes down which they trail toward the

Page 192

river and streams. This region was undoubtedly favorable to the flint
workers of Pre-Chellean and Chellean times. Kennard(16) believes that the
gravels are of the same age as those of the 'high terrace' of the lower valley
of the Thames; the height above the stream level is practically the same,
namely, about 80 feet. Another geologist, Clement Reid,(17) holds that the
plateau, composed of Wealden chalk, through which flowed the stream
bearing the Piltdown gravels, belongs to a period later than that of the
maximum depression of Great Britain; that the deposits are of Pre-Glacial
or early Pleistocene age; that they belong to the epoch after the cold period
of the first glaciation had passed but occur at the very base of the
succession of implement-bearing deposits in the southeast of England.
On the other hand, Dawson,(18) the discoverer of the Piltdown skull, in his
first description states: "From these facts it appears probable that the skull
and mandible cannot safely be described as being of earlier date than the
first half of the Pleistocene Epoch. The individual probably lived during the
warm cycle in that age."
The section of the gravel bed (Fig. 64) indicates that the remains of the
Piltdown man were washed down with other fossils by a shallow stream
charged with dark-brown gravel and unworked flints; some of these fossils
were of Pliocene times from strata of the upper parts of the stream. In this
channel were found the remains of a number of animals of the same age as
the Piltdown man, a few flints resembling eoliths, and one very primitive
worked flint of Pre-Chellean type, which may also have been washed down
from deposits of earlier age. These precious geologic and archæologic
records furnish the only means we have of determining the age of
Eoanthropus, the 'dawn man,' one of the most important and significant
discoveries in the whole history of anthropology. We are indebted to the
geologist Charles Dawson and the palæontologist Arthur Smith Woodward
for preserving these ancient records and describing them with great fulness
and accuracy as follows (pp. 132 to 139):
Several years ago Dawson discovered a small portion of an unusually thick
human parietal bone, taken from a gravel bed which was being dug for
road-making purposes on a farm close to Piltdown Common. In the autumn
of 1911 he picked up among the rain-washed spoil-heaps of the same
gravel-pit another and larger piece of bone belonging to the forehead region

Page 193

of the same skull and including a portion of the ridge extending over the left
eyebrow. Immediately impressed with the importance of this discovery,
Dawson enlisted the co-operation of Smith Woodward, and a systematic
search was made in these spoil-heaps and gravels, beginning in the spring
of 1912; all the material was looked over and carefully sifted. It appears
that the whole or greater part of the human skull had been scattered by the
workmen, who had thrown away the pieces unnoticed. Thorough search in
the bottom of the gravel bed itself revealed the right half of a jaw, which
was found in a depression of undisturbed, finely stratified gravel, so far as
could be judged on the spot identical with that from which the first portions
of the cranium were exhumed. A yard from the jaw an important piece of
the occipital bone of the skull was found. Search was renewed in 1913 by
Father P. Teilhard, of Chardin, a French anthropologist, who fortunately
recovered a single canine tooth, and later a pair of nasal bones were found,
all of which fragments are of very great significance in the restoration of the
skull.

Page 194

Fig. 64. Geologic section of
the Piltdown gravel bed,
showing in restored
outlines at the bottom of
layer 3 the position in
which the fragments of
the skull and jaw were
found. After Dawson.
1. Surface soil, with flints.
Thickness = 1 foot.
2. Pale-yellow sandy loam
with gravel and flints.
One Palæolithic worked

Page 195

flint was found in the
middle of this bed.
Thickness = 2 feet, 6
inches.
3. Dark-brown gravel, with
flints, Pliocene rolled
fossils and Eoanthropus
skull, beaver tooth,
'eoliths' and one worked
flint. Thickness = 18
inches.
4. Pale-yellow clay and sand.
Thickness = 8 inches.
5. Undisturbed strata of
Wealden age.

The jaw appears to have been broken at the symphysis, and somewhat
abraded, perhaps after being caught in the gravel before it was completely
covered with sand. The fragments of the cranium show little or no signs of
stream rolling or other abrasion save an incision caused by the workman's
pick.
Analysis of the bones showed that the skull was in a condition of
fossilization, no gelatine or organic matter remained, and mingled with a
large proportion of the phosphates, originally present, was a considerable
proportion of iron.[Y]

Page 196

Fig. 65. The single worked
flint of very primitive
type found in the same
layer (3) with the
fragments of the
Piltdown skull. After
Dawson. One-half actual
size.

The dark gravel bed (Fig. 64, layer 3), 18 inches in thickness, at the bottom
of which the skull and jaw were found, contained a number of fossils which
manifestly were not of the same age as the skull but were certainly from
Pliocene deposits up-stream; these included the water-vole and remains of
the mastodon, the southern mammoth, the hippopotamus, and a fragment of
the grinding-tooth of a primitive elephant, resembling Stegodon. In the
spoil-heaps, from which it is believed the skull of the Piltdown man was
taken, were found an upper tooth of a rhinoceros, either of the Etruscan or
of Merck's type; the tooth of a beaver and of a hippopotamus, and the leg-
bone of a deer, which may have been cut or incised by man. Much more
distinctive was a single flint (Fig. 65), worked only on one side, of the very
primitive or Pre-Chellean type. Implements of this stage, as the author
observes, are difficult to classify with certainty, owing to the rudeness of
their workmanship; they resemble certain rude implements occasionally

Page 197

found on the surface of the chalk downs near Piltdown. The majority of the
flints found in the gravel were worked only on one face; their form is thick,
and the flaking is broad and sparing; the original surface of the flint is left
in a smooth, natural condition at the point grasped by the hand; the whole
implement thus has a very rude and massive form. These flints appear to be
of even more primitive form than those at St. Acheul described as Pre-
Chellean by Commont.

Page 198

Fig. 66. Eoliths found in or
near the Piltdown gravel-
pit. After Dawson. One-
half actual size.
a. Borer (above).
b. Curved scraper (below).

The eoliths found in the gravel-pit and in the adjacent fields are of the
'borer' and 'hollow-scraper' forms; also, some are of the 'crescent-shaped-
scraper' type, mostly rolled and water-worn, as if transported from a
distance. This is a stream or river bed, not a Palæolithic quarry.
There can be little doubt, however, that the Piltdown man belonged to a
period when the flint industry was in a very primitive stage, antecedent to
the true Chellean. It has subsequently been observed that the gravel strata(3)
containing the Piltdown man were deeper than the higher stratum
containing flints nearer the Chellean type.
The discovery of this skull aroused as great or greater interest even than that
attending the discovery of the two other 'river-drift' races, the Trinil and the
Heidelberg. In this discussion the most distinguished anatomists of Great
Britain, Arthur Smith Woodward, Elliot Smith, and Arthur Keith, took part,
and finally the original pieces were re-examined by three anatomists of this
country.[Z]

Page 199

Fig. 67. Skull of South
African Bushman
(upper) exhibiting the
contrast in the structure
of the jaw and forehead.
One-quarter life size.
Original restoration of
the Piltdown skull
(lower) made by Smith
Woodward in 1913. One-
quarter life size.

Page 200

It is important to present in full the original opinions of Smith Woodward,
who devoted most careful study to the first reconstruction of the skull (Fig.
67), a model which was subsequently modified by the actual discovery of
one of the canine teeth. In his original description it is observed that the
pieces of the skull preserved are noteworthy for the great thickness of the
bone, it being 11 to 12 mm. as compared with 5 to 6 mm., the average
thickness in the modern European skull, or 6 to 8 mm., the thickness in the
skull of the Neanderthal races and in that of the modern Australian; the
cephalic index is estimated at 78 or 79, that is, the skull is believed to have
been proportionately low and wide, almost brachycephalic; there was
apparently no prominent or thickened ridge above the orbits, a feature
which immediately distinguishes this skull from that of the Neanderthal
races; the several bones of the brain-case are typically human and not in the
least like those of the anthropoid apes; the brain capacity was originally
estimated at 1070 c.cm., not equalling that of some of the lowest brain types
in the existing Australian races and decidedly below that of the Neanderthal
man of Spy and La Chapelle-aux-Saints; the nasal bones are typically
human but relatively small and broad, so that the nose was flattened,
resembling that in some of the existing Malay and African races.

Page 201

Fig. 68. Three views of the
Piltdown skull as
reconstructed by J. H.
McGregor, 1915. This
restoration includes the
nasal bones and canine
tooth, which were not
known at the time of
Smith Woodward's
reconstruction of 1913.
One-quarter life size.

Page 202

The jaw presents profoundly different characters; the whole of the bone
preserved closely resembles that of a young chimpanzee; thus the slope of
the bony chin as restored is between that of an adult ape and that of the
Heidelberg man, with an extremely receding chin; the ascending portion of
the jaw for the attachment of the temporal muscles is broad and thickened
anteriorly. Associated with the jaw were two elongated molar teeth, worn
down by use to such an extent that the individual could not have been less
than thirty years of age and was probably older. These teeth are relatively
longer and narrower than those in the modern human jaw. The canine tooth,
identified by Smith Woodward as belonging in the lower jaw, strengthened
by the evidence afforded by the jaw itself, proves that the face was elongate
or prognathous and that the canine teeth were very prominent like those of
the anthropoid apes; it affords definite proof that the front teeth of the
Piltdown man resembled those of the ape.
The author's conclusion is that while the skull is essentially human, it
approaches the lower races of man in certain characters of the brain, in the
attachment of the muscles of the neck, in the large extent of the temporal
muscles attached to the jaw, and in the probably large size of the face. The
mandible, on the other hand, appears precisely like that of the ape, with
nothing human except the molar teeth, and even these approach the
dentition of the apes in their elongate shape and well-developed fifth or
posterior intermediate cusp. This type of man, distinguished by the smooth
forehead and supraorbital borders and ape-like jaw, represents a new genus
called Eoanthropus, or 'dawn man,' while the species has been named
dawsoni in honor of the discoverer, Charles Dawson. This very ancient type
of man is defined by the ape-like chin and junction of the two halves of the
jaw, by a series of parallel grinding-teeth, with narrow lower molar teeth,
which do not diminish in size backward, and by the steep forehead and
slight development of the brow ridges. The jaw manifestly differs from that
of the Heidelberg man in its comparative slenderness and relative deepening
toward the symphysis.
The discussion of this very important paper by Smith Woodward and
Dawson centred about two points. First, whether the ape-like jaw really
belonged with the human skull rather than with that of some anthropoid ape
which happened to be drifted down in the same stratum; and second,
whether the extremely low original estimate of the brain capacity of 1070

Page 203

c.cm., was not due to incorrect adjustment or reconstruction of the separate
pieces of the skull.
Keith,(19) the leader in the criticism of Woodward's reconstruction,
maintained that when the two sides of the skull were properly restored and
made approximately symmetrical, the brain capacity would be found to
equal 1500 c.cm.; the brain cast of the skull even as originally reconstructed
was found to be close to 1200 c.cm. This author agreed that skull, jaw, and
canine tooth belonged to Eoanthropus but that they could not well belong to
the same individual.
In defense of Woodward's reconstruction came the powerful support of
Elliot Smith.(20) He maintained that the evidence afforded by the re-
examination of the bones corroborated in the main Smith Woodward's
identification of the median plane of the skull; further, that the original
reconstruction of the prognathous face was confirmed by the discovery of
the canine tooth, also that there remained no doubt that the association of
the skull, the jaw, and the canine tooth was a correct one. The back portion
of the skull is decidedly asymmetrical, a condition found both in the lower
and higher races of man. A slight rearrangement and widening of the bones
along the median upper line of the skull raise the estimate of the brain
capacity to 1100 c.cm. as the probable maximum.
Elliot Smith continued that he considered the brain to be of a more
primitive kind than any human brain that he had ever seen, yet that it could
be called human and that it already showed a considerable development of
those parts which in modern man we associate with the power of speech;
thus, there was no doubt of the unique importance of this skull as
representing an entirely new type of "man in the making." As regards the
form of the lower jaw, it was observed that in the dawn of human existence
teeth suitable for weapons of offense and defense were retained long after
the brain had attained its human status. Thus the ape-like form of the chin
does not signify inability to speak, for speech must have come when the
jaws were still ape-like in character, and the bony changes that produced the
recession of the tooth line and the form of the chin were mainly due to
sexual selection, to the reduction in the size of the grinding-teeth, and, in a
minor degree, to the growth and specialization of the muscles of the jaw
and tongue employed in speech.

Page 204

Fig. 69. The Piltdown skull
with the right half
removed to display the
extreme thickness of the
bones and the shape of
the brain. As restored by
J. H. McGregor. One-
quarter life size.

Page 205

Fig. 70. Outline of the left
side of the Piltdown
brain, compared with
similar brain outlines of
a chimpanzee and of a
high type of modern
man. One-half life size.

At first sight the brain-case resembles that of the Neanderthal skull found at
Gibraltar, which is supposed to be that of a woman; it is relatively long,
narrow, and especially flat, but it is smaller and presents more primitive
features than those of any known human brain. Taking all these features
into consideration, we must regard this as being the most primitive and
most ape-like human brain so far recorded; one such as might reasonably be
associated with a jaw which presented such distinctive ape characters. The
brain, however, is far more human than the jaw, from which we may infer
that the evolution of the brain preceded that of the mandible, as well as the
development of beauty of the face and the human development of the
bodily characters in general.

Page 206

The latest opinion of Smith Woodward[AA] is that the brain, while the most
primitive which has been discovered, had a bulk of nearly 1300 c.cm.,
equalling that of the smaller human brains of to-day and surpassing that of
the Australians, which rarely exceeds 1250 c.cm.
The original views of Smith Woodward and of Elliot Smith regarding the
relation of the Piltdown race to the Heidelberg and Neanderthal races are
also of very great interest and may be cited. First, the fact that the Piltdown
and Heidelberg races are almost of the same geologic age proves that at the
end of the Pliocene Epoch the representatives of man in western Europe had
already branched into widely divergent groups: the one (Heidelberg-
Neanderthal) characterized by a very low projecting forehead, with a
subhuman head of Neanderthaloid contour; the other with a flattened
forehead and with an ape-like jaw of the Piltdown contour. We should not
forget that in the Piltdown skull the absence of prominent ridges above the
eyes may possibly be due in some degree to the fact that the type skull may
belong to a female, as suggested by certain characters of the jaw; but among
all existing apes the skull in early life has the rounded shape of the Piltdown
skull, with a high forehead and scarcely any brow ridges. It seems
reasonable, therefore, to interpret the Piltdown skull as exhibiting a closer
resemblance to the skulls of our human ancestors in mid-Tertiary times than
any fossil skull hitherto found. If this view be accepted, we may suppose
that the Piltdown type became gradually modified into the Neanderthal type
by a series of changes similar to those passed through by the early apes as
they evolved into typical modern apes, with their low brows and prominent
ridges above the eyes. This would tend to support the theory that the
Neanderthal men were degenerate offshoots of the Tertiary race, of which
the Piltdown skull provides the first discovered evidence—a race with a
simple, flattened forehead and developed eye ridges.

Page 207

Fig. 71. Restoration of the
head of Piltdown man, in
profile, based upon the
reconstruction shown in
Fig. 68, p. 137. After
model by J. H.
McGregor. One-quarter
life size.

Elliot Smith concluded that members of the Piltdown race might well have
been the direct ancestors of the existing species of man (Homo sapiens),
thus affording a direct link with undiscovered Tertiary apes; whereas, the
more recent fossil men of the Neanderthal type, with prominent brow ridges
resembling those of the existing apes, may have belonged to a degenerate
race which later became extinct. According to this view, Eoanthropus

Page 208

represents a persistent and very slightly modified descendant of the type of
Tertiary man which was the common ancestor of a branch giving rise to
Homo sapiens, on the one hand, and of another branch giving rise to Homo
neanderthalensis, on the other.

Fig. 72. Restoration of the
head of Piltdown man,
full front, after model by
J. H. McGregor. One-
quarter life size.
(Compare Figs. 68 and
71.)

Page 209

Another theory as to the relationships of Eoanthropus is that of Marcelin
Boule,(21) who is inclined to regard the jaws of the Piltdown and Heidelberg
races as of similar geologic age, but of dissimilar racial type. He continues:
"If the skull and jaw of Piltdown belong to the same individual, and if the
mandibles of the Heidelberg and Piltdown men are of the same type, this
discovery is most valuable in establishing the cranial structure of the
Heidelberg race. But it appears rather that we have here two types of man
which lived in Chellean times, both distinguished by very low cranial
characters. Of these the Piltdown race seems to us the probable ancestor in
the direct line of the recent species of man, Homo sapiens; while the
Heidelberg race may be considered, until we have further knowledge, as a
possible precursor of Homo neanderthalensis."
The latest opinion of the German anatomist Schwalbe(22) is that the proper
restoration of the region of the chin in the Piltdown man might make it
possible to refer this jaw to Homo sapiens, but this would merely prove that
Homo sapiens already existed in early Pleistocene times. The skull of the
Piltdown man, continues Schwalbe, corresponds with that of a well-
developed, good-sized skull of Homo sapiens; the only unusual feature is
the remarkable thickness of the bone.[AB]
Finally, our own opinion is that the Piltdown race was not related at all
either to the Heidelbergs or to the Neanderthals, nor was it directly ancestral
to any of the other races of the Old Stone Age, or to any of the existing
species of man. As shown in the human family tree in Chapter VI, the
Piltdown race represents a side branch of the human family which has left
no descendants at all.

Mammalian Life of Chellean and Acheulean Times(23)
Southern mammoth.
Hippopotamus.
Straight-tusked elephant.
Broad-nosed rhinoceros.
Spotted hyæna.
Lion.
Bison and wild ox.

Page 210

Red deer.
Roe-deer.
Giant deer.
Brown bear.
Wolf.
Badger.
Marten.
Otter.
Beaver.
Hamster.
Water-vole.
The mammalian life which we find with the more advanced implements of
Chellean times apparently does not include the old Pliocene mammals, such
as the Etruscan rhinoceros and the sabre-tooth tiger. With this exception it is
so similar to that of Second Interglacial times that it may serve to prove
again that the third glaciation was a local episode and not a wide-spread
climatic influence. This life is everywhere the same, from the valley of the
Thames, as witnessed in the low river-gravels of Gray's Thurrock and
Ilford, to the region of the present Thuringian forests near Weimar, where it
is found in the deposits of Taubach, Ehringsdorf, and Achenheim, in which
the mammals belong to the more recent date of early Acheulean culture.
The life of this great region during Chellean and early Acheulean times was
a mingling of the characteristic forest and meadow fauna of western Europe
with the descendants of the African-Asiatic invaders of late Pliocene and
early Pleistocene times.

Page 211

Pl. IV. The Piltdown man of
Sussex, England.
Antiquity variously
estimated at 100,000 to
300,000 years. The ape-
like structure of the jaw
does not prevent the
expression of a
considerable degree of
intelligence in the face.
After the restoration
modelled by J. H.
McGregor.

Page 212

The forests were full of the red deer (Cervus elaphus), of the roe-deer (C.
capreolus), and of the giant deer (Megaceros), also of a primitive species of
wild boar (Sus scrofa ferus) and of wild horses probably representing more
than one variety. The brown bear (Ursus arctos) of Europe is now for the
first time identified; there was also a primitive species of wolf (Canis
suessi).
The small carnivora of the forests and of the streams are all considered as
closely related to existing species, namely, the badger (Meles taxus), the
marten (Mustela martes), the otter (Lutra vulgaris), and the water-vole
(Arvicola amphibius). The prehistoric beaver of Europe (Castor fiber) now
replaces the giant beaver (Trogontherium) of Second Interglacial times.
Among the large carnivora, the lion (Felis leo antiqua) and the spotted
hyæna (H. crocuta) have replaced the sabre-tooth tiger and the striped
hyæna of early Pleistocene times. Four great Asiatic mammals, including
two species of elephants, one species of rhinoceros, and the hippopotamus,
roamed through the forests and meadows of this warm temperate region.
The horse of this period is considered(24) to belong to the Forest or Nordic
type, from which our modern draught-horses have descended. The lions and
hyænas which abounded in Chellean and early Acheulean times are in part
ancestors of the cave types which appear in the succeeding Reindeer or
Cavern Period. In general, this mammalian life of Chellean and early
Acheulean times in Europe frequented the river shores and the neighboring
forests and meadows favored by a warm temperate climate with mild
winters, such as is indicated by the presence of the fig-tree and of the
Canary laurel in the region of north central France near Paris.
Undoubtedly the Chellean and Acheulean hunters had begun the chase both
of the bison, or wisent (B. priscus), and of the wild cattle, or aurochs.[AC]
This warm temperate mammalian life spread very widely over northern
Europe, as shown especially in the distribution (Fig. 44) of the
hippopotamus, the straight-tusked elephant, and Merck's rhinoceros. The
latter pair were constant companions and are seen to have a closely similar
and somewhat more northerly range than the hippopotamus, which is rather
the climatic companion of the southern mammoth and ranges farther south.
These animals in the gravel and sand layers along the river slopes and

Page 213

'terraces' mingled their remains with the artifacts of the flint workers. For
example, in the gravel 'terraces' of the Somme we find the bones of the
straight-tusked elephant and Merck's rhinoceros in the same sand layers
with the Chellean flints. Thus the men of Chellean times may well have
pursued this giant elephant (E. antiquus) and rhinoceros (D. merckii) as
their tribal successors in the same valley hunted the woolly mammoth and
woolly rhinoceros.

Distribution of the Chellean Implements
All over the world may be found traces of a Stone Age, ancient or modern,
primitive implements of stone and flint analogous to those of the true
Chellean period of western Europe but not really identical when very
closely compared. These represent the early attempts of the human hand,
directed by the primitive mind, to fashion hard materials into forms adapted
to the purposes of war, the chase, and domestic life. The result is a series of
parallels in form which come under the evolution principle of convergence.
Thus, in all the continents except Australia—in Europe, in Asia, and even in
North and South America—primitive races have passed through an
industrial stage similar to the typical Chellean of western Europe. This we
should rather attribute to a similarity in human invention and in human
needs than to the theory that the Chellean industry originated at some
particular centre and travelled in a slowly enlarging wave over the entire
world.

Page 214

Larger Image

Fig. 73. Distribution of the
principal Pre-Chellean
and Chellean industrial
stations in western
Europe.

In western Europe the Chellean culture certainly had a development all its
own, adapted to a race of bold hunters who lived in the open and whose
entire industry developed around the products of the chase. For them flint
and quartzite took the place of bronze, iron, or steel. This culture marked a
distinct and probably a very long epoch of time in which inventions and
multiplications of form were gradually spread from tribe to tribe, exactly as
modern inventions, usually originating at a single point and often in the
mind of one ingenious individual, gradually spread over the world.

Page 215

Larger Image

Fig. 74. Section of the middle
and high terraces at St.
Acheul, from southwest
to northeast. After
Commont, 1908, 1909,
modified and redrawn.
The Pre-Chellean
workers first established
themselves here at the
time when the Somme
was visited by the
straight-tusked elephant
and other primitive
mammals of the warm
African-Asiatic fauna.
(Compare Fig. 59, p.
122.)

Page 216

The clearest examples of the evolution of the seven or eight implements of
the Chellean culture from the five or six rudimentary types of the Pre-
Chellean have been found at St. Acheul by Commont. The abundance and
variety of flint at this great station on the Somme made it a centre of
industry from the dawn of the Old Stone Age to its very close. It was
probably a region favorable to all kinds of large and small game. The
researches of Commont show that with the exception of Castillo in northern
Spain no other station in all Europe was so continuously occupied. From
Pre-Chellean to Neolithic times the men of every culture stage except the
Magdalenian and Azilian-Tardenoisian found their way here, and thus the
site of St. Acheul presents an epitome of the entire prehistoric industry.
Even during the colder periods of climate this region continued to be visited
—possibly during the warm weather of the summer seasons. At Montières,
along the Somme, we find deposits of Mousterian culture which is
generally characteristic of the cold climatic period but is here associated
with a temperate fauna, including the hippopotamus, Merck's rhinoceros,
and the straight-tusked elephant. Great geographic and climatic changes
took place in the valley of the Somme during this long period of human
evolution. The Pre-Chellean workers first established their industry on the
middle and high 'terraces' at the time when the Somme was visited by the
straight-tusked elephant and other much more primitive mammals of the
warm Asiatic fauna. The early Acheulean camps on the same terraces were
pitched in the gravels below layers of 'loess' which betoken an entire
climatic change. The fourth glaciation passed by, and the Upper Palæolithic
flint workers again returned and left the débris of their industry in the layers
of loam which swept down the slopes of the valley from the surrounding
hills. This succession will be studied more in detail in connection with the
industry.

Page 217

Larger Image

Fig. 75. Excavation on the
'high terrace' at St.
Acheul, known as the
ancienne carrière
Dupont and more
recently as the carrière
Bultel, showing eight
geologic layers from the
Upper Palæolithic
deposits of brick-earth at
the top(9) down to the
sub-Chellean yellow
gravels(2) overlying the
chalk terrace at the
bottom.

As contrasted with the four or more Pre-Chellean stations already known,
namely, St. Acheul, Montières, Helin, Gray's Thurrock, and possibly
Abbeville and Piltdown, there are at least sixteen stations in western Europe
which are characteristically Chellean. In addition to the sites named above,

Page 218

all of which show deposits of typical Chellean implements above the Pre-
Chellean, we may note the important Chellean stations of San Isidro and
Torralba in central Spain; Tilloux and Marignac in southwestern France;
Créteil, Colombes, Bois Colombes, and Billancourt on the Seine, in the
immediate vicinity of Paris; Cergy on the Oise; the type station of Chelles
on the Marne; Abbeville on the northern bank of the Somme; and the
famous station of Kent's Hole, Devon, on the southwestern coast of
England. Thus far no typical Chellean station has been discovered in
Portugal, Italy, Germany, or Austria, nor, indeed, in any part of central
Europe. This leaves the original habitat of the tribes that brought the
Chellean culture to western Europe still a mystery; but, as already observed,
the location of the stations favors the theory of a migration through northern
Africa rather than through eastern Europe.

Page 219

Larger Image

Fig. 76. Principal forms of
small, late Chellean
scraping, planing, and
boring tools of flint, after
Commont and
Obermaier. One-half
actual size. 1.
Combination tool—small
flake with a sharp point
(a), cutting edge (b), and
curved-in scraper (c). 2.
Cutting tool with
protective retouch for the

Page 220

index finger on the upper
edge (a), and a sharp
cutting edge (b). 3.
Primitive knife. 4.
'Point.' 5. Combination
tool—small flake with
scraper edge (b), and two
curved-in scraper edges
(a and a1). 6. Borer. 7.
Pointed scraper. 8. Knife
with coarse boring point
at one end. 9. Thick
scraper or planing tool.
10. Curved scraper.

Compared with the Pre-Chellean flint workers the Chellean artisans
advanced both by the improvement of the older types of implements and by
the invention of new ones.(25) As observed by Obermaier, the flint worker is
still dependent on the chance shape of the shattered fragments of flint which
he has not yet learned to shape symmetrically. In the experimental search
after the most useful form of flint which could be grasped by the hand, the
very characteristic Chellean coup de poing was evolved out of its Pre-
Chellean prototype. This implement was made of an elongate nodule, either
of quartzite or, preferably, of flint, and flaked by the hammer on both sides
to a more or less almond shape; as a rule, the point and its adjacent edges
are sharpened; the other end being rounded and blunted. Like most, if not
all, of the Chellean implements, it was designed to be grasped by the bare
hand and not furnished with a wooden haft or handle. It is not impossible
that some of the pointed forms may have been wedged into a wooden
handle, but there is no proof of it. In size the coup de poing varies from 4 to
8 inches in length, and examples have been found as large as 9½ inches.
That it served a variety of purposes is indicated by the existence of four
well-defined, different forms: first, a primitive, almond-shaped form;
second, an ovaloid form; third, a disk form; and fourth, a pointed form
resembling a lance-head. De Mortillet(26) speaks of it as the only tool of the
Chellean tribes, but in its various forms it served all the purposes of axe,

Page 221

saw, chisel, and awl, and was in truth a combination tool. Capitan(27) also
holds that the coup de poing is not a single tool but is designed to meet
many various needs. The primitive almond and ovaloid forms were
designed for use along the edges, either for heavy hacking or for sawing;
the disk forms may have been used as axes or as sling-stones; the more
rounded forms would serve as knives and scrapers; while the pointed,
lance-shaped forms might be used as daggers, both in war and in the chase.
The Chellean flint workers also developed especially a number of small,
pointed forms from the accidentally shaped fragments of flint, showing both
short and long points carefully flaked and chipped. Thus, out of the small
types of the Pre-Chellean there evolved a great variety of tools adapted to
domestic purposes, to war, and to the chase.

Chellean Geography in England and France
The type station of the Chellean culture is somewhat east of the present
town of Chelles. Here in Chellean times the broad floods of the ancient
River Marne were transporting great quantities of sand and débris, products
of the early pluvial periods of Third Interglacial times; and here, on the
right bank, embedded in sands and gravels 24 feet thick, are found the
typical Chellean implements mingled with remains of the hippopotamus,
straight-tusked elephant, Merck's rhinoceros, giant beaver, hyæna, and
many members of the Asiatic forest and meadow fauna.
The flint-working stations at St. Acheul were on bluffs from 40 to 80 feet
above the present level of the Somme. The Chellean and the following
Acheulean industry was carried on here on a very extensive scale. In one
year Rigollot collected as many as 800 coups de poing from the ancient
quarries; near by are other quarries equally rich in material, and we may
imagine that the products of the flint industry in this favorable locality were
carried far and wide into other parts of the country.
In the vicinity of Paris, and again at Arcy, in the valley of the Bièvre, the
workers of Chellean, Acheulean, and Mousterian flints sought in succession
the old river-gravels belonging to the lower levels; these 'low terraces' are
only 15 feet above the present height of the river and are still occasionally

Page 222

flooded by the high waters of the Seine, indicating that the Seine borders
have not altered their levels. The animal life here was identical with that of
the Somme and of the Thames and included the hippopotamus, Merck's
rhinoceros, and the straight-tusked elephant.
Thus it would appear that, in regard to the river courses and the hills
through which they flowed, the topography and landscape of northern
France and of southern Britain were everywhere the same as at the present
time. The forests which clothed the hills were not greatly different from the
present, except for the presence of a few trees of a warmer clime, nor was
there anything strange or unfamiliar in the majority of the animals that
roamed through forest and meadow. The three chief archaic elements
consisted in the presence of two very ancient races of men and their rude
stage of culture, in the great forms of Asiatic and African life which
mingled with the more familiar native types, and in the broad, continuous
land surfaces which swept off unbroken to the west and southwest.
For in those days Europe, though even then little more than a great
peninsula, extended far beyond its present limits. England and Ireland were
still part of the mainland, and great rivers flowed through the broad valleys
that are now the Irish Sea, the North Sea, and the English Channel—rivers
that counted the Seine, the Thames, the Garonne, and even the Rhine, as
mere tributaries. The Strait of Gibraltar was then the Isthmus of Gibraltar—
a narrow land bridge connecting Europe with Africa. The Mediterranean
was then an inland lake, or rather two inland lakes, for Italy and Sicily
stretched out in a broad, irregular mass to join the northern coast of Africa,
while Corsica and Sardinia formed a long peninsula extending from the
Italian mainland and almost, if not quite, reaching to the African coast.

The Thames Valley in Chellean Times
The interpretation of the features of stratification in the valley of the
Somme is especially interesting because it gives us a key to the
understanding of a similar sequence of prehistoric events in the valley of
the Thames.

Page 223

The station of Gray's Thurrock in this valley is barely 120 miles distant
from the Chellean station of Abbeville, in the valley of the Somme, and it is
apparent that the old flint workers were freely passing across the broad
intervening country and interchanging their ideas and inventions. Thus it
happened that Chellean implements identical with, or closely related to, the
types of the Somme valley were being fashioned all over southern Britain
from the Thames to the Ouse. The ancient River Thames (Lyell,(28)
Geikie(29)) was then flowing over a bed of boulder-clays which had been
deposited during the preceding glaciations. Its broad, swift stream was
bringing down great deposits of ochreous gravels and of sands
interstratified with loams and clays. It is these old true river-gravels which
display their greatest thickness on the lowest levels of the Thames and
which are largely made up of well-bedded and distinctly water-worn
materials. On these low levels the flint workers sought their materials, and
here they left behind them the archaic Chellean implements which are now
found embedded in these older river-gravels, just as they occur in the
gravels washed down over the three terraces of the Somme and the Marne.
In the Thames this old gravel wash seems to have been down-stream,
whereas on the middle and upper terraces of the Somme the gravel wash
came directly down the sides of the valley, except, perhaps, in very high
floods. These deep beds of gravel, sand, and loam lie for the most part
above the present overflow plain of the Thames, although in some places
they descend below it; which proves that the main landscape of the Thames
also, except for the changes of the flora and of animal life, was the same in
Pre-Chellean and Chellean times as it is at present. Thus the Somme, the
Thames, and the Seine had all worn their channels to the present or even to
lower levels when the Pre-Chellean hunters appeared. Since Chellean times
all three rivers have silted up their channels.
The changes along the Thames which have since occurred are in the
superficial layers brought down from the sides of the valley which have
softened the contours of the old terraces and have also entombed the later
phases of the valley's prehistory.
Sections on the south bank at Ilford, Kent, and on the north bank at Gray's
Thurrock, Essex, confirm this view. At the latter station, in low-lying strata
of brick-earth, loam, and gravel, such as would be formed by the silting up
of the bottom of an old river channel, are found the remains of the straight-

Page 224

tusked elephant, broad-nosed rhinoceros, and hippopotamus. All the
discoveries of recent years lead to the conclusion that the old fluviatile
gravels which contain these ancient mammals and flints are restricted to the
lower levels of the Thames valley, while the high level gravels and loams
are of later date. Old Chellean flints also occur occasionally on the higher
levels, but here it would seem that they have been washed down from the
old land surfaces above, because they are found mingled with flints of the
late Acheulean and early Mousterian industry.

England in Early Palæolithic Times
It is on the higher levels of the Thames, as of the Somme, and in the
superficial deposits covering the sides of the valley that we read the story of
the subsequent Palæolithic cultures and of an early warm temperate climate
being followed by a cold climate with frozen subsoil belonging to the fourth
glaciation and the contemporary Mousterian flint industry. The Palæolithic
history of the Thames(30) has not yet been fully interpreted, but it would
appear that the relics of the old stations of Kent and Norfolk will yield all
the forms of Chellean and Acheulean implements, and probably also those
of the Mousterian which have been discovered in the valley of the Somme,
thus proving that the Lower Palæolithic races of this region pursued the
same culture development as the neighboring tribes of France and Belgium,
as well as those of Spain, up to the close of middle Acheulean times.
A similar sequence of events appears to be indicated at Hoxne, Suffolk,
where archaic palæoliths were discovered as far back as 1797. This
discovery was neglected for upward of sixty years, until in 1859 these flints
were re-examined by Prestwich and Evans after their visit to the stations of
the Somme (Geikie,(31) Avebury(32)). This site was in the hollow of a
surface of boulder-clay, overlain by the deposit of a fresh-water stream; in
the bed of its narrow channel, besides flint implements of early Acheulean
type, abundant plant remains were found which give us an interesting vision
of the flora of the time.
These plants are decidedly characteristic of a temperate climate, including
such trees as the oak, yew, and fir, and mostly of species which are still
found in the forests of the same region. This life gave place, as indicated in

Page 225

plant deposits of a higher level, to an arctic flora, probably corresponding
with the tundra climate of Mousterian times, the period of the fourth
glaciation. Above these are found again layers of plants and of mollusks
which point to the return of a temperate climate.

Spread of the Acheulean Industry
It is noteworthy that not a single 'river-drift,' Pre-Chellean or Chellean,
station has been found in Germany or Switzerland, or, in fact, in all central
Europe in the region lying between the Alpine and Scandinavian glaciers.
Either this region was unfavorable to human habitation or the remains of
the stations have been buried or washed away.
It is significant that the earliest proof of human migration into this region,
whether from the east or from the west we do not certainly know, is
coincident with the dry climate of Acheulean times. The 'loess' conditions
of climate seem to be coincident with the earliest Acheulean stations in
Germany, such as Sablon. 'Loess' deposition is by no means a proof of a
cold climate but rather of an arid one, especially in regions where areas of
finely eroded soil were liable to be raised by the wind; such areas were
found over the whole recently glaciated country north of the Alps and south
of the Scandinavian peninsula.
The Palæolithic discovery sites of Germany are principally grouped in three
regions(33) as follows:
To the south, along the headwaters of the Rhine and the Danube, among the
limestones of Swabia and the Jura were formed the caverns sought by early
Mousterian man. To the west of these were many older stations in the 'loess'
deposits of the upper Rhine, between the mountain ridges of the Vosges and
the Black Forest, and still nearer the sources of the Rhine, extending over
the border into Switzerland, are a number of famous cave sites in the
valleys cut by the Rhine and its tributaries through the white Jurassic
limestone. To the west is the group of the middle Rhine and of Westphalia,
which includes the open Acheulean camps in the 'loess' deposits above the
river and a number of cavern stations. To the north is the scattered group of
stations, both of Acheulean and Mousterian times, of north Germany. Here

Page 226

the sites are few and far between. The open-country camps were established
chiefly in the valley of the Ilm and near the caves of the Harz Mountains, in
the neighborhood of Gera. No discoveries of certain date or unquestioned
authenticity are reported from eastern Germany.
Along the upper Rhine the flint workers of Acheulean times established
their ancient camps mostly in the open on the broad sheets of the 'lower
loess,' which, constantly drifted by the wind, covered and preserved the
stations. These stations are widely scattered, but they were frequented from
earliest Acheulean times, and the region was revisited to the very close of
the Upper Palæolithic.

Larger Image

Page 227

Fig. 77. Flint working stations
of the Men of the Old
Stone Age along the
waters of the Ilm, the
Rhine, and the Danube,
from Acheulean to
Azilian times. After R.
R. Schmidt, modified
and redrawn. These
Palæolithic sites of
Germany lie between the
terminal moraines of the
successive glacial
advances of the Second,
Third, and Fourth (II, III,
IV) Glacial Stages,
extending from the
borders of the
Scandinavian ice-fields
on the north to those of
the Alpine ice-fields on
the south. The dotted
surface represents the
area covered by the drift
of the Fourth Glacial
Stage.

Early in Acheulean times the important 'loess' station of Achenheim was
established. This is a most famous locality and is of especial importance
because it is the only station in Germany which was continuously
frequented from late Acheulean times throughout the Lower Palæolithic and
into the beginning of the Upper Palæolithic; here the 'older loess' of the
Third Interglacial Stage yields a typical Acheulean industry.
Thus far the region of the middle Rhine and of Westphalia has not shown
any evidence of Acheulean culture. The north German stations, however,

Page 228

were entered in Acheulean times, and the principal open stations of this
region lie along the valley of the Ilm. Here, at Taubach, Ehringsdorf, and
Weimar, we find implements of typical Acheulean form belonging to the
early warm temperate Acheulean period. The stations of the Ilm valley
southwest of Leipsic are also of great importance because of the rich record
which they contain of the warm temperate animal life of early Acheulean
times; the flint culture is typically Acheulean, and the climatic conditions
are read both in the travertines and in the subsequent deposits of the 'lower
loess,' which belong to the cold dry period of late Acheulean times. Here
lingered the straight-tusked elephant and Merck's rhinoceros, contemporary
with the workers of the Acheulean flints.
It will be observed that in Germany the early Acheulean was a warm period
which in certain regions was also arid and subject to great dust-storms. At
this time the camps were for the most part in the open country. In the late
period, also arid and subject to high winds but with a cooler climate, the
flint workers continued to frequent the open Acheulean stations in the
'loess.' If there were shelter and cavern stations in this region, they have not
as yet been discovered. This would appear to indicate that the climate had
not yet become severe.
Similar testimony is found in the great scarcity of cavern and shelter
stations in Acheulean times in every part of western Europe; yet
occasionally the tribes repaired to the vicinity of sheltering cliffs, as along
the Vézère. In some scattered localities they sought the caverns, as at
Krapina, in Croatia, at Spy, on the Meuse in Belgium, and at Castillo, in
northern Spain. These rare exceptions to the open camps would tend to
prove that the caverns were sought rather for protection from enemies and
as rain shelters than as retreats from a bitter-cold climate.
In the valley of the Beune, a small tributary of the Vézère, in Dordogne, we
find a true Acheulean station quite close to the river shore. This proves that
in Acheulean times this valley was already deepened to the same degree as
it is to-day. In the valley of the Somme the Acheulean culture stretches from
the 'highest terrace' down below the present level of the river, which has
made for itself a new high channel. The fact that two Acheulean stations are
found on the upper Garonne, high above the present water-level, is of little
significance, as at that time the water-level was also high.

Page 229

In general the Acheulean flint workers preferred the open stations
throughout all Acheulean times, and their camps are found on the open
plateaus between the rivers or on the various 'terrace' levels, as on the
higher, middle, and lower 'terraces' of the Somme at St. Acheul, or again
close along the borders of the rivers and streams, as in the Dordogne region.
Even during the early Acheulean stage a dry climate had begun to prevail in
certain parts of Germany. Near Metz is the 'older loess' station of Sablon,
which was occupied in early Acheulean times, indicating a warm period of
arid climate favorable to the transportation of the wind-blown 'loess';
doubtless, this fine dust at times filled the entire atmosphere and obscured
the sun, as is the case to-day on the high steppes and deserts of eastern Asia.
An exception to the open-country life preferred by the Acheulean flint
workers is found in the great grotto[AD] of Castillo, near Puente Viesgo, in
the Province of Santander, northern Spain. The deposits which filled this
grotto to a thickness of 45 feet from the floor to the roof were explored by
Obermaier, who found them divided into thirteen layers, covering eleven
periods of industry and presenting the most wonderful epitome of the
prehistory of western Europe from Acheulean times to the Age of Bronze,
in Spain (Fig. 79).

Page 230

Fig. 78. Entrance (white
cross) to the great grotto
of Castillo in northern
Spain. This grotto was
frequented by the Men of
the Old Stone Age from
Acheulean to Azilian
times, an archæologic
sequence surpassed only
by that of the open
camps along the terraces
of the Somme.
Photograph from
Obermaier.

As early as 1908, Breuil(34) discovered in the interior of the cave back of
the grotto some quartzites worked into Acheulean types, proving that the

Page 231

cavern was entered in Acheulean times. Obermaier,(35) in the course of three
years' work, has found that the floor of the grotto was possibly used as a
flint-making station in Acheulean and, possibly, in Chellean times. The
culture section which he has revealed here under the direction of the Institut
de Paléontologie humaine can be compared only with that which Commont
has found on the 'terraces' of the Somme at St. Acheul. The difference is
that in the shelter of the Castillo grotto the climate is recorded only through
the changing forms of animal life which are mingled around the fire-hearths
and with the flints in the ascending levels.

Larger Image

Fig. 79. Stratigraphic section
showing the archæologic

Page 232

layers of the great grotto
of Castillo. After
Obermaier.
(13) Eneolithic Age. Small,
triangular dagger in
copper.
(12) Azilian. Flint industry—
Age of the Stag.
(11) Upper Magdalenian.
Artistic engravings on
stag-horn.
(10) Lower Magdalenian.
Flints and fine
engravings on bone.
Reindeer bâton.
(9) Archaic Solutrean.
Feuilles de laurier,
retouched on one side
only.
(8, 7, 6) Upper Aurignacian in
three layers. Remains of
the reindeer and burins.
(5) Lower Aurignacian.
Implements of stone and
bone. Remains of an
infant.
(4) Upper Mousterian. Rich in
small implements and
large tools of quartzite.
Merck's rhinoceros very
abundant.

Page 233

(3) Typical Mousterian flints
and quartzites. Merck's
rhinoceros.
(2) Early Mousterian industry.
Bones of cave-bear and
Merck's rhinoceros.
(1) Acheulean flints.
The entrance to this grotto is on the side of a high hill overlooking the
valley and might easily have been barricaded against attack. In early
Acheulean times, when the flint workers were on the very floor of the
grotto, the lower entrance of the cavern was still open, leading far into the
heart of the mountain. The successive accumulations of débris, cave loam,
fire-stones, bones, and innumerable flints, together with great blocks falling
over the entrance of the cavern, reached a height of 45 feet, so that during
the Upper Palæolithic only the upper entrance to the cavern was used by the
artists of Magdalenian times. The subsequent Azilian and Eneolithic
cultures were crowded under the very roof of the grotto at the sides.
This station, repaired to and then abandoned by tribe after tribe over a
period estimated at present as not less than 50,000 years, is a monumental
volume of prehistory, read and interpreted by the archæologist almost as
clearly as if the whole record were in writing.
The first positive evidences of the use of fire are the layers of charred wood
and bones frequently found in the industrial deposits of early Acheulean
times.

Geographic and Climatic Changes
During the early period of development of the Acheulean industry, the
geography, the climate, and the plant and animal life continued to present
exactly the same aspect as during Chellean times. The mammals which we
find in Thuringia in the lower travertines of the valley of the Ilm, at
Taubach, near Weimar, and at Ehringsdorf, mingled with flints of early
Acheulean industry, are of the same species as those found in the valley of

Page 234

the Somme mingled with the implements of the Chellean industry. The
southern mammoth occurs at Taubach, and we find the straight-tusked
elephant (E. antiquus), Merck's rhinoceros, the hippopotamus, the lion, and
the hyæna representing the ancient African-Asiatic migrants, while the
north European and Asiatic life is represented by the giant deer, roe-deer,
wild goat, brown bear, wolf, badger, marten, otter, beaver, meadow hamster,
and shrew. Grazing in the meadows were the aurochs, or wild ox, and the
wisent, or bison. There was one variety of horse, probably of the forest
type. Thus, the fauna as a whole contains six Asiatic types, or eight if we
include the bison and wild cattle. Of the forest life there are nine species,
including the wild boar (Sus scrofa ferus) not mentioned above.
The layers of travertine are indicative of very important geographical
changes which were occurring in central and southern Europe in the middle
period of Third Interglacial times. The travertines of the Ilm and of other
parts of central Germany were due to wide-spread volcanic disturbances
and eruptions, accompanied by the deposition of travertines, gypsums, and
tufas. To this volcanic disturbance in central France is attributed the
deposition of the tuf de La Celle-sous-Moret, near Paris, which records the
warm temperate climate of early Acheulean times, as well as the somewhat
cooler succeeding climate of late Acheulean times. This uplift in the centre
of Germany and France apparently left the region between France and Great
Britain undisturbed, because there is evidence of continued free migration
of the tribes and of the Acheulean cultures; but there appears to have been a
wide-spread subsidence of the coasts of southern Europe by which the
islands of the Mediterranean became isolated from the mainland, and the
migrating routes between Europe and Africa across the central
Mediterranean region were cut off. Thus, Italy, Sicily, and Sardinia were
separated from the mainland after having received a large contingent of
mammalian life from the continents both to the north and to the south.
While descendants of the African and Asiatic mammals, as well as of the
northerly European forest and meadow types, survive on these islands, there
is, thus far, no indication that they were invaded by hunters carrying the
implements of the Acheulean culture, although these Acheulean flint
workers ranged over all parts of the Italian peninsula (Fig. 80), as indicated
by the discovery of nine stations.

Page 235

Distribution of Acheulean Stations
The Acheulean stations are widely distributed along the Seine, Marne, and
Somme in northern France, where flint is abundant and well adapted for
fine workmanship. In central and southern France, where large flints are
scarce, the Acheulean tribes were forced to use quartz, which fashions into
clumsier forms. In the north the Acheulean workers continued on the old
Chellean sites at Chelles, St. Acheul, Abbeville, and Helin. In late
Acheulean times were established the new stations of Wolvercote on the
Thames, near Oxford, and of Levallois on the Seine, near Paris, both
famous for their 'Levallois' flint knives or blades. Near Levallois is the late
Acheulean station of Villejuif, south of Paris, where the flints are buried in
drifts of loess. In Normandy are the important stations of Frileuse, Bléville,
and La Mare-aux-Clercs, which give the whole Acheulean development,
both early and late. On a small tributary valley of the Vézère, in Dordogne,
in late Acheulean times there was established the station of La Micoque,
which gives its name to a number of miniature flints of distinctive form
which were first found there and are known as the 'type of La Micoque.'
Other stations, such as Combe-Capelle, also show examples of this
'miniature' Acheulean workmanship.

Page 236

Larger Image

Fig. 80. Distribution of the
principal Acheulean
industrial stations in
western Europe.

Altogether, over thirty Acheulean stations have been found in France, two
—Castillo and San Isidro—in northern and central Spain, the single station
of Furninha in Portugal, over eight in Germany, three in Austria, and three
in Russian Poland. Especially remarkable is the wide distribution of this
culture all over Italy, where explorations by no means exhaustive have
resulted in the discovery of at least nine or ten very prolific stations
extending from Goccianello in the north to Capri in the south, but not into
Sicily as far as is at present known. Thus all of western Europe, excepting
the area covered by the Scandinavian ice-fields on the north and by the

Page 237

Alpine ice-fields on the south, was penetrated by the workers of Acheulean
flints, probably members, for the most part, of the Neanderthal race.

Fig. 81. Late Acheulean
station of La Micoque, in
Dordogne, where
miniature flints of
distinctive late
Acheulean form are
found. Photograph by N.
C. Nelson.

The general uniformity of Acheulean workmanship in all parts of western
Europe is an indication that these Neanderthaloid tribes were more or less

Page 238

migratory and that the inventions of new and useful implements, such as the
lance-pointed coup de poing of La Micoque and the flint-flakes of
Levallois, which probably originated at an especial centre, or perhaps even
in the inventive mind of a single workman, became widely distributed and
highly distinctive of certain periods. The development of the implements in
different regions is so uniform as to prove that the evolution of the early
Palæolithic cultures extended all over western Europe and that the various
types or stages were essentially contemporary.

Forms of Acheulean Implements
There is a close sequence between the coup de poing of the Chellean
workers and its development into the finer and more symmetrical forms of
the Acheulean. The latter, according to Obermaier,(36) is distinguished by
the flaking of the entire surface, by the far more skilful fashioning, and by
the really symmetrical almond form which is attained by retouching both
the surface and the edges. This more refined retouch becomes the means of
producing symmetrical instruments, with straight, convex, or concave
cutting edges, as well as finer and lighter tools.

Page 239

Fig. 82. Illustrating the
method of 'flaking' flint
implements by direct or
indirect blow with a
hammer-stone.

The early Acheulean industry belonged to a warm temperate climatic period
and directly succeeds the Chellean, as shown in a most perfect manner in
the quarries of the type station of St. Acheul on the Somme. In these earlier
strata the prevailing forms of coup de poing are the 'pointed oval' and the
'lance-pointed,' the latter showing very simple chipping, a broad point, and
a thick base. The oval coups de poing are smaller than the Chellean tools of
the same kind, carefully fashioned on all sides and round the base, and very
symmetrical; there are four distinct varieties of these: the almond type, oval
almond-shaped, elongate oval, and subtriangular—the latter evolving into
the finely modelled type of late Acheulean times. It may have been from
these oval types that the disc form was finally evolved.

Page 240

Fig. 83. Illustrating the
method of 'chipping' flint
implements by pressure
with a bone or wooden
implement, to produce
the finer retouch of the
surfaces and edges.

There is wide difference of opinion regarding the use of these thin ovaloid,
triangular, and disc forms. Obermaier considers that they may have been
clamped in wood, or furnished with a shaft, thus forming a spear head.
Another suggestion is that they were used with a leather guard to protect the
hand; and there is no doubt that in either case they would have served as
effective weapons in chase or war. Another view is that of Commont,(37)
who believes that not a single implement down to the very end of
Acheulean times can be regarded as a weapon of war; this author maintains
that many of these implements, including those dressed on both edges, were
still in various ways grasped by the hand, although they do not present the
firm, blunted grip of the ancient coups de poing.

Page 241

We also note the development of a type of coup de poing, with cutting blade
fashioned straight across the end: this primitive chisel or adze-shaped tool
may have been used as a chopper, or as an axe, in fashioning wooden tools.

Fig. 84. Method of producing
the long flake and the
central core of flint by
sharp blows at the
indicated point of
percussion. After R. R.
Schmidt. In this case a
series of flakes have
been cut off the entire

Page 242

periphery of the core.
The primitive use of the
flake begins in the Pre-
Chellean.

In the lance-pointed coup de poing of narrow, elongate shape, the flaking is
very simple and the edges are continued into the short base, generally very
thick, and often showing part of the original crust of the flint nodule, which
is well adapted for the grip of the hand. This implement, which serves the
original idea of the coup de poing, develops into the round-pointed and
lance-pointed forms. There is no question that, whether in industrial use, in
war, or in the chase, these implements were held only by the hand.
Industrial.
Coup de poing.
Ovaloid.
Double-edged.
Subtriangular.
Straight cutting blade across the end.
Disc-shaped.
Triangular—very thin and flat.
Hachette, chopper.
Grattoir, planing tool.
Racloir, scraper.
Perçoir, drill, borer.
Couteau, knife.
'Pointe' (Levallois blade).
'Pointe,' point—oval and chisel-shaped.

War and Chase.
Coup de poing.
Of pointed and lance-pointed types.
Pierre de jet, throwing stone.
Couteau, knife.
'Pointe,' dart and spear heads.

Page 243

The small implements of the early Acheulean included a great variety of
designs developing out of the far more primitive tools of Chellean and Pre-
Chellean times, namely, the planing tool, the scraper, the borer, and the
knife. Each of these types develops its own variety, often fashioned with
great care, primitive blades, straight-edged cutting tools, with the back
rounded or blunted for the grip of the fingers, scrapers with straight or
curved edges, and perçoirs or borers. The scraping and planing tools,
doubtless used for the dressing of hides, are now more carefully fashioned.
We also observe the racloir and the scraper finished to a point which is the
precursor of the graving tool of the Upper Palæolithic.(38)
Characteristic of this stage is the systematic use of large 'flakes' or outlying
pieces of flint struck off from the core, which were used as scrapers or
planes, or developed into small 'haches,' or coups de poing.
The core or centre of the flint nodule still constitutes the material out of
which the large typical implements are fashioned; but the flake begins to
lend itself to a great variety of forms, as witnessed in the evolution of the
Levallois knives of the Upper Acheulean and the highly varied flake
implements of the Mousterian and Aurignacian industries.
The 'pointe,' or point, is a special implement chipped out of a short, sharply
convex flake, taking the form of a blunt dart or spear head, pointed at one
end and oval or flat at the other.

Page 244

Larger Image

Fig. 85. Large, typical
Acheulean implements,
chiefly described as
coups de poing, after de
Mortillet. One-quarter
actual size. One of these
(41) shows at one end a
part of the crust of the
flint nodule left intact to
afford a smooth, firm
grip to the hand. Another
(43) shows a part of the
crust remaining along the

Page 245

left side, for the same
purpose. Two of the
coups de poing (47 and 48)
show, the one a double-
curved, the other a
straight, lateral edge.
Another coup de poing
(49), from a submarine
deposit near the shore at
Havre, is partly covered
by acorn shells.

Late Acheulean Climate
The Acheulean industry continued over a very long period, and by the time
the late Acheulean culture stage had been reached a decided change of
climate ensued in western Europe. Along the borders of the Danube and of
the Rhine, in the valley of the Somme, and even in central and southern
France there are indications of a cool dry continental climate, similar to that
which is now found on the southern steppes of Russia, in the Ural
Mountains, and in the vicinity of the Caspian Sea. Indications of this
climate have been mentioned above, as seen in the plant life in the tuf de La
Celle-sous-Moret, near Paris, where there are evidences that trees of a cool
temperate climate took the place of the warm temperate forests of early
Acheulean times.
That the climate should be considered as cool and arid rather than
comparable with the bitter-cold climate of the 'upper loess' period, when a
true steppe fauna entered Europe for the first time, is further indicated by
the fact that late Acheulean implements are more frequently found in the
centre and north of France than in the south.
To the far north, before the close of Acheulean times, the Scandinavian ice-
fields had again begun to advance southward; the region bordering the
glaciers was cold and moist and favored the migration from the tundra
regions of the woolly mammoth and woolly rhinoceros to the locality still
frequented by the Acheulean flint workers, for it is said(39) that Acheulean

Page 246

flints are occasionally associated even with the remains of these tundra
mammals. At the very same time the Acheulean flint workers along the
Somme may have enjoyed a more genial climate.
It is only through this interpretation of the various climatic and life zones in
western Europe that we can explain the survival on the River Somme, or
return to this river from the south, of a warm temperate fauna, hippopotami,
rhinoceroses, and elephants, in the Mousterian period, which is even
subsequent to the close of Acheulean times.
The valleys of the two great river-systems of southwestern France, the
Dordogne draining the central plateau, and the Garonne draining the eastern
Pyrenees, were now sought by the Acheulean flint workers. The valley of
the Vézère, a northern tributary of the Dordogne, cuts through a broad
plateau of limestone in which the streams have hollowed out deep beds with
vertical sides. Here the landscape of late Acheulean times bore the same
general aspect as at present.(40) Evidences of a change of climate are
observed even in the sheltered valleys where the flint workers were seeking
the warmer and sunnier river-slopes. The river channels were the same as
they are to-day, and the quarries of the early Acheulean flint workers are
found quite close to the streams; but as the period progressed they moved
up nearer to the cliffs and shelters. Here, too, there is evidence that a dry
continental climate prevailed. On the upper levels of the old plateaus of
Dordogne we still find the Quercus ilex occurring quite frequently, a tree
which belongs to relatively dry regions and which in southern Russia is
reckoned with the flora of the steppes. Yet the greater aridity toward the
close of the Acheulean stage was probably not such as to prevent the growth
of forests along the borders of the streams. Thus, in the mammalian life of
the period there was, perhaps, a division between the more hardy forms
which frequented the dry plateaus above and the forest-loving and less
hardy forms which frequented the river-valleys.

Page 247

Fig. 86. "Valleys of the two
great river-systems of
southwestern France, the
Dordogne draining the
central plateau and the
Garonne draining the
eastern Pyrenees." After
Harlé.

The most convincing proof of an arid climate in the north of France with
prevailing high westerly winds is found in the layers of 'loess' which occur
on the 'terraces' of the Somme, the Seine, the Rhine, and the Danube. These
'lower loess' layers of Third Interglacial times frequently contain
implements of the late Acheulean industry. Thus, at Villejuif, south of Paris,
late Acheulean implements are found embedded in drifts of 'loess.' In the
valley of the Somme, flints of the middle Acheulean stage are also found in
the loess ancien and 'river-drift.' In the tuf de La Celle-sous-Moret the layer

Page 248

of 'loess' immediately overlies the tufa layer containing late Acheulean
implements and proofs of a cooler climate.

Fig. 87. "The valley of the
Vézère, a northern
tributary of the
Dordogne, cuts through a
broad plateau of
limestone in which the
streams have hollowed
out deep beds with
vertical sides," favorable
to the formation of
caverns, grottos, and
shelters. "Here the

Page 249

landscape of late
Acheulean times bore the
same general aspect as at
present." Photograph by
N. C. Nelson.

Among the most famous of the 'loess' stations of late Acheulean times is
that of Achenheim on the upper Rhine, west of Strasburg. Here the 'older
loess' contains a typical Acheulean culture.
With this prolonged epoch of cooler temperature the hippopotamus and the
southern mammoth retreated to the warmer portions of southern Europe,
and their remains are no longer found associated with the late Acheulean
flints. The more hardy straight-tusked elephant and Merck's rhinoceros still
continued in the north, apparently well adapted to sustain a very
considerable fall in temperature.

Forms of Late Acheulean Implements
The coups de poing of the late Acheulean exhibit a great advance upon the
Chellean, being fashioned into dagger or lance forms, with all the edges
carefully chipped. The ovaloid implements of late Acheulean times are
often worked into fine and sharp blades, which may have been used like
butcher-knives for dismembering the carcasses of game and for cutting up
the pelts, while the fine almond and disc shapes may have been used as
scrapers to cut off the tissues of the inner surfaces of the hides, which were
finally dressed by the grattoir, or flint planing tool. In brief, the coup de
poing reaches its acme of development in late Acheulean times, both in the
fineness of flaking and retouching and in its symmetry of form. The use of
large flakes of flint and the retouching both of the borders and of the
extremities of these flakes shows a constantly improving technique. It is in
the thin, flat, triangular blades and in the lance-pointed forms that the coup
de poing reaches its culmination; but we still observe the development of
the oval or almond-shaped forms and of the flattened discs. The implements

Page 250

of this time reach their greatest perfection in the north of France, where flint
is so abundant.

Larger Image

Fig. 88. Varied shapes of the
Acheulean flints
described as coups de
poing, including some
'miniature' forms, after
de Mortillet. The oval,
the pointed, the almond,
the triangular, the disc-
shaped. The late

Page 251

Acheulean is
distinguished by an
advance in all the finer
and smaller implements,
tools, and weapons; yet
the finest work of
Acheulean times appears
thick and clumsy when
contrasted with the best
Solutrean work of the
Upper Palæolithic. One-
quarter actual size.

The late Acheulean is further distinguished by an advance in all the finer
and smaller implements and tools. The knives are now very fine and
perfect, although they retain the broad, thick form of the original flint
fragment and seldom attain the symmetrical shape which characterizes the
blades of the Upper Palæolithic.(41) The 'points' are also of finer technique,
with their edges converging from a broad base to a well-formed point. It is
generally assumed that these were held in the bare hand, but it is quite as
probable that they were attached to wooden shafts and used as dart or spear
heads. By far the most numerous as well as the most varied of the smaller
tools were the racloirs, or scrapers, which were developed, doubtless, by the
increasing use of skins for clothing as a protection against the somewhat
more rigorous climate of late Acheulean times. Probably the women of the
tribe were employed in dressing hides by means of these scrapers, which
were either flat and broad with crescent-shaped edges, flat and narrow, or
double-edged with rounded ends. The development of other fine tools—
borers, small discs, triangular and ovaloid shapes, miniature coups de
poing, and many varied forms besides—is best witnessed in the station of
La Micoque, close to the junction of the Vézère with the Dordogne. These
miniature implements may well have been used in the final dressing of
skins for clothing, in the chase of smaller kinds of game, or at feasts for
splitting marrow-bones.

Page 252

Fig. 89. The chef-d'œuvre of
the Acheulean industry is
the Levallois flake,
which may have evolved
from the large flakes of
Chellean times. After
Worthington Smith.

No bone implements whatever have been found even with these late
Acheulean flints, but it is important to observe that the majority of these
stations are open and exposed to the weather and that bone implements
would not be preserved here as they would in the sheltered grottos and
caverns to which the flint workers repaired in the Mousterian and
succeeding times.
As regards the finish of these flint implements, it is important to note that it
is fine only by comparison with the crude work of the early Acheulean or
the still coarser types of Chellean times and that the very finest work of

Page 253

Acheulean times appears thick and clumsy when contrasted with the finer
work of the Upper Palæolithic.
The chef-d'œuvre of the late Acheulean industry is the Levallois flake, first
found at Levallois-Perret, near Paris, which de Mortillet believed to be
fashioned out of a divided coup de poing with a flat under-side, but which
may have been evolved from the very large primitive flakes of Pre-Chellean
date. These flakes date back earlier than the Chellean coup de poing but
continued in use after its invention and may have been greatly perfected
into the Levallois type. This type of 'couteau' is a large, wide, thin flake of
fairly symmetrical shape, with a flat back formed by the original smooth
surface of the flake. These implements are pointed, oval, or sharply
rectangular in form and present the most characteristic tool of the closing
stage of the Acheulean industry.
It is most interesting at this point to observe the two modes of evolution
which seem to pervade all nature: first, the gradual perfection and
modification in size and proportion of a certain older form; second, the
sudden change or mutation into a new form, which in turn enters the stage
of gradual improvement.
The late Acheulean is seen to present the climax of a gradual and unbroken
development from the early Chellean industries and ideas; and to our mind
this is strongly suggestive of a corresponding evolution of manual skill and
mental development in the workmen themselves, who may have been partly
of Pre-Neanderthaloid race.
The next industrial stage, namely, the Mousterian, which certainly presents
the closing workmanship of the Neanderthal race, shows a marked
retrogression of technique in contrast to the steady progression which we
have observed up to this time. We have, in fact, witnessed a number of
successive stages of progression, which are to be followed in the
Mousterian by a stage of retrogression. Such a retrogression in industrial
development may for certain known or unknown reasons occur in the same
race. It is a noteworthy parallel that in the Upper Palæolithic, where the
Solutrean culture represents the climax and perfection of flint working, the
succeeding Magdalenian shows marked retrogression in the technique of
flint retouch.

Page 254

The Krapina Neanderthaloids
In northern Croatia, near the small town of Krapina, in the valley of the
Krapinica River, is the now famous cavern of Krapina, where in 1899 was
made the fourth discovery of the remains of men of the Neanderthaloid race
in western Europe, twelve years after the discovery of the men of Spy, in
Belgium, and forty-three years after the discovery of the man of
Neanderthal. Even now opinion is divided as to the age of the human
remains found in this cavern. The discoverer, Professor Gorjanovič-
Kramberger of Agram considered that the stone implements and chips were
of Mousterian age, and Breuil still refers them to the early, or so-called
warm, Mousterian period; this opinion is shared by Déchelette. Schmidt,
however, regards Krapina as a true Acheulean station, lacking in some of
the typical implements, and of the same age as the 'loess' station of
Ehringsdorf.

Page 255

Fig. 90. The grotto of
Krapina, overlooking the
valley of the Krapinica
River, near Krapina,
Croatia, in Austria-
Hungary. After Kraemer.

The mammals found in the cavern certainly belong to the very late
Acheulean period and include Merck's rhinoceros, the cave-bear, the urus, a
species of horse, the giant deer (Megaceros), the beaver, and the marmot
(Arctomys marmotta).
The cavern was originally washed out by the river, but now it is 82 feet
above the present water-level. When found it was completely filled with
sand and gravel deposits, weathered fragments from the roof and walls, and
loose stones and boulders.(42) Enclosed in this mass, in separate strata

Page 256

which are perfectly distinguishable, there lay, variously distributed through
the different layers, thousands of animal bones, mingled with hundreds of
human bones, and hundreds of stone implements and chips.

Larger Image

Fig. 91. Cross-section of the
valley traversed by the
Krapinica River showing
the location of the grotto
known as the Krapina
recess on the bank to the
left. Drawn by C. A.
Reeds.

During the years 1899-1905 Gorjanovič-Kramberger made a thorough
exploration of the contents of this cavern, and published a complete account
of his researches in 1906.(43) There were about three hundred pieces of
human bones, among them many small fragments, also many sizable pieces
of skull and several entire limb bones perfectly preserved. The bones are of
a strongly characterized type, and the lower jaws, face bones, bones of the
thigh and arm, the teeth, and the bones of many children establish the
Krapina race as belonging unquestionably in the same group with that of
Neanderthal and of Spy.

Page 257

Fig. 92. Detail showing the
interior contents of the
Krapina grotto before its
excavation in the years
1899 to 1905. After
Gorjanovič-Kramberger.

The skull of the Krapina man (Fig. 93) is somewhat broader or more
brachycephalic than that of any other members of the Neanderthal race. In
general, the race is somewhat dwarfed, of broader head form and with less
prominent supraorbital processes. The species is unquestionably Homo
neanderthalensis, of which the Krapina men constitute a local race.
Schwalbe and Boule observe that the greater breadth of the Krapina skull is
partly due to the manner in which the bones have been put together,(44) and

Page 258

they do not consider that the Krapina man represents a different subrace
(Homo neanderthalensis krapinensis) as held by the discoverer. The
cephalic index of one Krapina skull is recorded as 83.7 per cent (?) as
compared with 73.9 per cent, the cephalic index of the true H.
neanderthalensis, a difference which, as above noted, may be partly due to
the restoration. The bones are in such a fragmentary condition that it is
impossible to form a proper estimate of the brain capacity in either the
males or females of this race; nor is it possible to estimate the stature. The
space between the eyes is the same as in the Neanderthal race; the angle of
the retreat of the forehead (52°) is nearly the same as in the Gibraltar female
Neanderthal skull (50°), this high forehead being due to the lesser
development of the supraorbital ridges. That the brain was of a low, flat-
headed Neanderthal type is shown by the close similarity of the index of the
height of skull (42.2) to that of one of the men of Spy (44.3), as compared
with the lowest index among the existing races of men (48.9); yet the
Krapina man presents a considerable advance over Pithecanthropus, in
which the index of the height of skull is only 34.2.

Fig. 93. Profile view, right
side, of one of the skulls

Page 259

from Krapina. This skull
is much broader than that
of the typical
Neanderthaloid. After
Gorjanovič-Kramberger.
One-quarter life size.

The jaw is more slender than that of the Heidelberg man but is still thick
and massive; the chin is receding, a characteristic of all the Neanderthal
races.
The broken condition of all the human bones in this cavern, and the
abundant indications of fire, have led to the charge that the Neanderthals of
Krapina were cannibals, and that these mingled remains are the bones of
animals and men collected here during cannibalistic feasts. Against this
supposition Breuil observes that none of the human bones are split
lengthwise, as is the usual practice when extracting the marrow, but they are
broken crosswise. This is the only evidence of such practice that has been
found during all Palæolithic times, and we should hesitate to accept it
unless corroborated by other localities.
The various layers indicate that the cavern was successively occupied by
man; in or near the hearths are found stone implements, broken and
incinerated bones, and pieces of charcoal, which may indicate that this
grotto was visited only at intervals, perhaps during the colder seasons of the
year.

(1) Harlé, 1910.1.
(2) d'Ault du Mesnil, 1896.1, pp. 284-296.
(3) Obermaier, 1912.1, p. 146.
(4) Schmidt, 1912.1, pp. 118-126.

Page 260

(5) Boule, 1888.1.
(6) Obermaier, 1912.1, pp. 327-329.
(7) Haug, 1907.1, vol. II, pp. 327-329.
(8) Geikie, 1914.1, p. 262.
(9) Morlot, 1854.1.
(10) Commont, 1906.1.
(11) Geikie, 1914.1, pp. 107-111.
(12) d'Ault du Mesnil, op. cit.
(13) Schmidt, 1912.1, pp. 124, 125.
(14) Obermaier, 1912.1, p. 118.
(15) Dawson, 1913.1; 1913.2; 1913.3.
(16) Kennard, 1913.1.
(17) Reid, 1913.1.
(18) Dawson, 1913.1, p. 123; 1914.1, pp. 82-86.
(19) Keith, A., 1913.1; 1913.2; 1913.3.
(20) Smith, G. E., 1913.1; 1913.2; 1913.3; 1913.4.
(21) Boule, 1913.1, pp. 245, 246.
(22) Schwalbe, 1914.1, p. 603.
(23) Osborn, 1910.1, pp. 404-409.
(24) Ewart, 1904.1; 1907.1; 1909.1.
(25) Obermaier, 1912.1, p. 120.
(26) de Mortillet, 1869.1.
(27) Obermaier, op. cit., p. 116.

Page 261

(28) Lyell, 1863.1, p. 164.
(29) Geikie, 1914.1, pp. 119, 263, 264.
(30) Schmidt, 1912.1, pp. 125, 126.
(31) Geikie, op. cit., p. 228.
(32) Avebury, 1913.1, p. 342, Fig. 236.
(33) Schmidt, op. cit., pp. 17-105.
(34) Breuil, 1912.5, p. 14.
(35) Obermaier, 1912.1, p. 164.
(36) Obermaier, op. cit., pp. 124, 125, 127, 130.
(37) Commont, 1908.1.
(38) Déchelette, 1908.1, vol. I, pp. 80-90.
(39) Geikie, 1914.1, p. 255.
(40) Hilzheimer, 1913.1, p. 145.
(41) Obermaier, 1912.1, p. 127.
(42) Fischer, 1913.1.
(43) Gorjanovič-Kramberger, 1901.1; 1903.1; 1906.1.
(44) Schwalbe, 1914.1, p. 597.

Page 262

CHAPTER III
CLOSE OF THE THIRD INTERGLACIAL,
TEMPERATE, AND ARID CLIMATE,
ACHEULEAN INDUSTRY—
ADVENT OF THE FOURTH
GLACIATION, PROFOUND
CHANGES IN ANIMAL AND PLANT
LIFE—THE ARCTIC TUNDRA
PERIOD OF MAMMALIAN AND
PLANT LIFE—CHARACTERS OF
THE NEANDERTHAL RACE, OF
THEIR MOUSTERIAN FLINT
INDUSTRY—SUPPOSED CAUSES
OF EXTINCTION OR DISPERSAL
We now reach a prolonged and important stage in the prehistory of Europe,
namely, the period of the fourth glaciation, of the final development of the
Neanderthal race of man, of the Mousterian industry, of the beginnings of
cave life, of the chase of the reindeer, and its use for food and clothing.
In all Europe the Acheulean industry appears to have come to a close during
a period of arid climate, warm in some parts of western Europe and cool or
even cold in others. The seasonal variations may well have been extreme, as
on the steppes of southern Russia, where exceedingly hot summers may be
followed by intensely cold winters, with high winds and snow-storms
destructive of life.
It is this seasonal alternation, as well as the recurrence, either seasonal or
secular, of milder climate, which explains the survival or return of the
Asiatic fauna even after the close of the Acheulean industry and when the
Mousterian industry was well advanced.
From deposits found at Grimaldi, in the Grotte des Enfants and in the
Grotte du Prince, it has long been said that men of early Mousterian times
lived contemporary with the hippopotamus, the straight-tusked elephant,

Page 263

and Merck's rhinoceros in the genial climate of the Mediterranean Riviera.
More recently the same animals have been found as far north as the Somme
valley in the 'river-drifts' of Montières-les-Amiens.(1) Here, again, we find
remains of the hippopotamus, the straight-tusked elephant, and its
companion, Merck's rhinoceros, in Mousterian deposits, a surprising
discovery, because it had always been supposed that a cold climatic period
had set in all over western Europe even before the close of the Acheulean
culture. But there is also evidence of a temperate climate still prevailing in
the Thames valley in the period of the Mousterian 'floors.'(2) Again, along
the Vézère valley, Dordogne, we find that at the station of La Micoque,
where the industry marks the transition between late Acheulean and early
Mousterian times, Merck's rhinoceros is found in the lowest layers
associated with remains of the moose (Alces).
There is evidence that Merck's rhinoceros and the straight-tusked elephant
lingered in western Europe during the whole period of the early
development of the Mousterian industry. As observed above, these animals
were hardier than the southern mammoth, which was the first of the Asiatic
mammals to disappear, soon to be followed by its companion, the
hippopotamus. Even after the advent of the closely associated tundra pair,
the woolly mammoth and the woolly rhinoceros, Merck's rhinoceros
persists, as, for example, in the deposits of Rixdorf, near Berlin, where this
ancient type occurs in the same deposits with the woolly mammoth, the
woolly rhinoceros, the reindeer, and the musk-ox, as well as with the forest
forms, the moose, stag, wolf, and forest horse. The extreme northern
latitude of this deposit explains the absence of the straight-tusked elephant,
which may at the time have been living farther to the south. The same
mingling of south and north Asiatic mammals is found at Steinheim, in the
valley of the Murr, some degrees to the west and south of Rixdorf, not far
from Göttingen, where we find Merck's rhinoceros(3) and the straight-
tusked elephant in association with the woolly mammoth, the woolly
rhinoceros, the giant deer, and the reindeer.
Thus the Neanderthal races were entering the Mousterian stage of culture
during the close of the Third Interglacial Stage and during the early period
of the advance of the ice-fields from the great centres in Scandinavia and
the Alps. As these ice-fields slowly approached each other from the north
and from the south a very great period of time must have elapsed during

Page 264

which all the south Asiatic mammals abandoned western Europe or became
extinct, with the exception of the lions and hyænas, which became well
fitted to the very severe climate that prevailed over Europe during the
fourth glaciation, and even during the long Postglacial Stage which ensued.
The large carnivora readily become thoroughly adapted to cold climates, as
they subsist on animal life wherever it may be found; tigers of the same
stock as those of India have been found as far north as the river Lena, in
latitude 52° 25', where the climate is colder than that of Petrograd or of
Stockholm, while the lion throve in the cold atmosphere of the upper Atlas
range. Thus the cave-lion (Felis leo spelæa) and the cave-hyæna (H.
crocuta spelæa) doubtless evolved an undercoating of fur as well as an
overcoating of long hair, like the tundra mammals. In size the lion of this
period in France often equalled and sometimes surpassed its existing
relatives, the African and west Asiatic lion; it frequently figures in the art of
the Upper Palæolithic artists and survived in western Europe to the very
close of Upper Palæolithic times.

The Fourth Glaciation
Penck(4) has estimated that the first maximum of the fourth glaciation in the
Alps was reached 40,000 years ago, and that after the recession period the
second maximum ended not less than 20,000 years ago. This would extend
the Mousterian industry over a very long period of time, for there can be no
doubt that the Mousterian culture was practically contemporaneous with the
fourth glaciation, even if a briefer period of time should be allotted to this
great natural event.
The fourth glaciation, like the first, is believed to have been
contemporaneous in Europe and North America,(5) a fact which is of
especial importance to American anthropologists in connection with the
question of the date of arrival of primitive man in America. In both
countries the glaciation reached an early maximum, which was followed by
a period of recession of the ice-fields, a time during which a somewhat
more temperate climate prevailed, but this in turn gave way to a second
advance of as great severity as the first.[AE]

Page 265

Larger Image

Fig. 94. Europe during the
extension of the ice-
fields and glaciers of the
Fourth Glacial Stage.
This is also supposed to
have been a period of
land depression and of
extension of the inland
seas of southern Europe.
Britain was probably
connected with France.
The ice-covered areas in
western Europe and
Britain were far more
limited than during the
Third Glacial Stage, yet
the climate appears to
have been more severe

Page 266

than at any previous
period. For the snow-
level compare Fig. 13.
Drawn by C. A. Reeds
after Geikie and De
Geer.
In the north, Scandinavia and Finland were again enshrouded in ice, and a
great mer de glace occupied the basin of the Baltic Sea, sending its terminal
moraines into Denmark and Schleswig-Holstein and over the northern
provinces of Germany, but this great ice-field did not again become
confluent with that of Great Britain.(7) At the commencement of the fourth
glaciation large glaciers descended over the Scottish mountain valleys and
filled many of them even to the sea; the coast subsided at least 130 feet in
this region. In southern Britain along the valley of the Thames there spread
an arctic flora, with the polar willow (Salix polaris) and the dwarf birch
(Betula glandulosa); an arctic plant bed has also been discovered in the
valley of the Lea. Thus the tundra climate extended from the Scottish
lowlands to the south of England, the land being bleak and almost treeless.
(8) This, we believe, was also the period of the arctic flora at Hoxne,
Suffolk, and of the arctic plant bed in the valley of the Thames. At this time
the valley was frequented by the reindeer, the woolly rhinoceros, and the
mammoth, whose remains are entombed in the low-level alluvia swept
down from the sides of the valley, so that the remains of this arctic fauna
may in places actually overlie those of the more deeply buried and far more
ancient warm Asiatic fauna of Chellean times. Like the Somme, the
Thames(9) was then from 10 to 25 feet below its present level, the bottom
having since silted up with alluvial soil.

Page 267

Fig. 95. The two large tundra
mammals, the woolly
rhinoceros (upper),
drawn from the work of
Upper Palæolithic artists
and from the specimen
discovered at Starunia, in
Galicia, Austria; and the
woolly mammoth
(lower). These hardy
animals gradually
replaced the African-
Asiatic pair, Merck's
rhinoceros and the

Page 268

straight-tusked elephant.
Drawn by Erwin S.
Christman. One-sixtieth
life size.
This was the period of the deposition of the 'upper drift' over the north
German lowlands, the Alps, and northern England, also of the early and late
Wisconsin, or 'upper drift,' which spreads very widely over the Eastern
States, from Wisconsin southward and eastward to the latitude of New
York. The gravels and sands of some of the 'lowest terraces' were also
deposited.

Mammalian Life of Mousterian Times
The three successive phases of climate and environment surrounding the
Neanderthal men during the period of the development of the Mousterian
industry, were in descending order as follows:
3. Extreme Cold Climate of the Last Great Glacial Advance.
Period of the late Mousterian industry of La Quina. Spread of all
the arctic and tundra mammals over western Europe, including
the musk-ox; migrations of the obi and banded lemming of the
extreme north. Life and industry of the Neanderthal races,
chiefly in the shelters, grottos, and entrances to the caverns.
2. Cold Moist Climate. Period of the middle or 'full Mousterian'
industry of the Neanderthal races. Appearance of the tundra life,
including well-protected mammals and birds from the arctic
region, also descent of the Alpine types to the foot-hills and
river borders. First forerunners of the steppe life; the full
Eurasiatic forest and field life widely spread over Europe. Life
and industry chiefly in the shelters, grottos, and entrances to the
caverns. Reindeer very abundant.
1. Warm or Cool Arid Climate. Transition from the Acheulean to
the early Mousterian culture, as observed in the stations of La
Micoque and of Combe-Capelle. The so-called 'warm
Mousterian' fauna, including the surviving hippopotamus,

Page 269

Merck's rhinoceros, and the straight-tusked elephant in northern
and southern France; herds of bison, cattle, and wild horses in
southwestern France. Tribal life, with the industry partly in open
stations, partly under sheltering cliffs.
This is the beginning of the 'Reindeer Period,' for this migrant from
Scandinavia, with its companions of the northeastern tundras, the woolly
mammoth and the rhinoceros, wandered slowly southward before the
advancing Scandinavian ice-fields, which were greatly augmented by the
increasingly cold and moist climate. Thus these animals are found in the
north with flints of the Mousterian culture before they appear in the more
genial region of Dordogne. In the somewhat older Acheulean-Mousterian
station of La Micoque, along the Vézère, the fire-hearths contain almost
exclusively the remains of horses and relatively few remains of bison and
wild cattle, but no reindeer. A fireplace near the station of Combe-Capelle
yields numerous remains of the bison, only a few of the horse, and the first
of the reindeer. Before the appearance of the reindeer in the valley of the
Vézère we may picture the meadow-lands as covered with bison and wild
horses, the latter of the type which is now characteristic of the high plateaus
of central Asia, while the bison of the period appears to be more similar to
the American buffalo than to the surviving European form.
Gradually the tundra animals spread toward the south with the cold climate
which for the first time swept all over western Europe. The whole aspect of
the country slowly changed with the approach of the reindeer, and the
northern flora of the spruce, the fir, and the arctic willow clad the more
sheltered river-valleys and hillsides, while the plateaus and fields were
partly or wholly deforested.

Page 270

Fig. 96. Typical tundra fauna.
"Gradually the tundra
animals pressed toward
the south with the cold
climate which for the
first time swept all over
western Europe." The
wolverene, Gulo luscus
borealis; the barren-
ground reindeer,
Rangifer tarandus
(drawn from the living
type); the arctic fox,
Canis lagopus; the

Page 271

musk-ox, Ovibos
moschatus; and the
banded lemming,
Myodes torquatus. One-
twenty-fifth life size. The
lemming (A) is also
shown one-seventh life
size. Drawn by Erwin S.
Christman.

Thus the country became adapted chiefly to the tundra types of mammals;
and in the middle Mousterian strata these herds, newly migrated from the
far north and from the northeastern steppes bordering the Obi River, largely
outnumber the steppe forms, which are limited to two or three species. Of
these the principal types are the steppe horse, related to the Przewalski
horse now living in the desert of Gobi, the steppe suslik (Spermophilus
rufescens), and the steppe grouse, or moor-hen. The more characteristic
forms of steppe life, such as the saiga antelope, the jerboa, and the kiang,
were all later arrivals and did not appear until after the close of the
Mousterian industry and the disappearance of the Neanderthal race.
This was due to the fact that the climate surrounding the Neanderthal race
in Mousterian times was cold and moist, with heavy rainfalls in summer
and snow-storms in winter, a climate thoroughly suited to the arctic tundra
mammals with their heavy covering of hair acting as a rain shed and the
undercoating of wool protecting them in the most severe weather.
The mammal life during the fourth glaciation, as it spread into the middle
Rhine and Westphalian region, is fully recorded in the 'loess' deposits of
Achenheim and in the famous grotto of Sirgenstein, on the upper Danube,
lying northwest of Munich, where, together with traces of the most
primitive Mousterian industry, are found remains of the mammoth, the
bison, the reindeer, a species of wild horse, and the cave-bear. Following
these mammals there is a record in the same deposit of the arrival of the Obi
lemming, from northern Russia.

Page 272

The fact that only seven Mousterian stations are known in all Germany, or
eight if we include the site of the Neanderthal burial, may be accounted for
by the relatively close proximity of the great Scandinavian glacier on the
north, which was only 350 miles distant from the great Alpine glacier on the
south. To the east were the plains of Bohemia and the vast lowland region
stretching northeastward to the tundras and eastward to the steppes, through
which came the great migrations of tundra and steppe life.

Larger Image

Fig. 97. The seven Mousterian
stations of Germany lay
between the

Page 273

Scandinavian glacier
(IV) on the north and the
Alpine glacier (IV) on
the south (dotted areas).
They include the grottos
of Sirgenstein,
Irpfelhöhle, and
Räuberhöhle, along the
valley of the Danube;
Kartstein and
Buchenloch, near the
middle Rhine, and
Baumannshöhle, south of
Hanover; also the open
loess station of
Mommenheim. The
Mousterian grotto of
Wildkirchli, in
Switzerland, lay within
the limits of the Alpine
ice-fields; and the burial
at Neanderthal, near
Düsseldorf, was
probably of Mousterian
age. After R. R. Schmidt,
modified and redrawn.

Geographic and Climatic Environment of the Neanderthal Race
Let us first glance at Dordogne. Among the stations of the early Mousterian
industry we have seen that the Neanderthals in the valley of the Vézère, at
La Micoque, were in the midst of a fauna chiefly composed of the bison and
of the wild horse, the remains found in the hearths being almost exclusively
of the latter animal.[AF] In the primitive Mousterian station of Combe-
Capelle near by the fire-hearths yield remains of the bison but only a few of
the horse.

Page 274

Among the earliest caves inhabited by man(10) was that of Le Moustier,
situated on the right bank of the Vézère, and about 90 feet above it. This
shelter and cave were examined as early as 1860-3 by Lartet(11) and Christy
and subsequently by de Vibraye,(12) Massénat,(13) and others. Besides the
deposits in the floor of the grotto there, a deep Mousterian culture layer has
been found under the cliff in front, and this has been selected for our
representation of the life of the men of Mousterian times, and of the flora of
the Vézère in this early period (see frontispiece). Peyrony observes that,
here as elsewhere, the older and lower industrial camps were farther away
from the shelters; indeed, in this very region there are evidences that the
Chellean and Acheulean flint workers occasionally visited the plateaus
above; but as time passed and the weather became more severe the
Neanderthals began to work nearer to the overhanging cliffs and finally
directly beneath them. At this classic station of Le Moustier, one of the
most complete skeletons of Neanderthal man was unearthed by Hauser, in
1908. There was a continuous residence here in middle and upper
Mousterian times, extending into the lower Aurignacian of the Upper
Palæolithic. The contemporary fauna in these deposits included the
mammoth, the reindeer, the giant deer (Megaceros), the horse, the bison, the
woolly rhinoceros, and the cave-bear. During the habitation of this typical
station by man the climate was very cold and damp.
In this region is found the complete record of the course of Mousterian
evolution, both in the implements and in the advent of new forms of life;
the number of reindeer gradually increases in the ascending layers with the
development of the Mousterian industry. There is a constant gradation from
the Acheulean into the Mousterian industrial types; according to Cartailhac,
this industry is all the work of the same people, with no sharp lines of
division.

Page 275

Fig. 98. The type station of Le
Moustier, on the right
bank of the Vézère,
Dordogne. The culture
layer is on the middle
terrace, overlooking the
hamlet of Le Moustier.
(Compare frontispiece,
Pl. I.) Photograph by
Belvès.

Thus at Combe-Capelle, where the début of the true Mousterian culture
took place, we find a number of large coups de poing, pointing back to the
early Acheulean implements. The gradations which are exhibited here in
these successive layers are quite in contrast to the advance of the industry at
the close of Mousterian times in the very same locality, where there is an
abrupt cultural transition toward the Aurignacian.
Southern Britain tells of a similar sequence, which we may interpret as
follows. Belonging either to the temperate climate of early Mousterian

Page 276

times, or to the period of the recession of the fourth glaciation, known in the
Alps as the Laufenschwankung, are the Mousterian stations along the Lea
and near the mouth of the Thames at Crayford (Worthington Smith,(14)
Geikie(15)). These Palæolithic 'floors' of Mousterian times are buried
beneath 4 to 5 feet of sand and loam and rest upon the surface of older
river-gravels. Among the later river deposits several old land surfaces have
been discovered; they consist of a few inches of angular gravel, crowded in
places with unabraded implements and flakes which obviously occur just
where they were left by Palæolithic workmen. At one point there is
evidence that the flint maker squatted over his work, with his knees slightly
apart, for the chips are thrown to the right and left in small piles. Here and
there, mixed with these Mousterian implements, are more archaic forms
which may have been drifted down from the older land surfaces above.

Page 277

Fig. 99. Excavations of the
Mousterian culture layer
under the cliff of Le
Moustier. Photograph by
N. C. Nelson.

One such floor has been traced by Worthington Smith(16) through
Middlesex and on both sides of the Thames. Plant remains occur plentifully
on this old land surface, including impressions of portions of leaves, stems
of grass, rushes, and sedges. The birch, alder, pine, yew, elm, and hazel
have been recognized. The common male fern is of frequent occurrence,
while the royal fern (Osmunda regalis) is found in profusion. Upon the
whole, this assemblage of plants indicates a temperate climate. The flints
described and figured by Worthington Smith are either of the late Acheulean
'Levallois flake' type or else of early Mousterian age. This writer(17) notes
the great number of instruments known as trimmed flakes, which are found
on the Palæolithic 'floor'; these are flakes of large size, trimmed to an
implement-like form on one side, while the other side is left perfectly plain;
the examples are remarkably constant to one form. The type of implement
here described resembles the flakes of Levallois or Combe-Capelle, or even
the typical 'point' from Le Moustier. Such flakes, shaped into the
Mousterian forms of racloir, or scraper, are very common in the gravels of
the Lea and of the Thames.
While the remains of the woolly mammoth are found here, there are also
indications of the presence of a well-marked temperate flora. These high-
level 'river-drifts' along the Thames(18) were certainly deposited when the
climatic conditions were temperate, but they are succeeded by deposits
indicating a renewed cold period, which may represent the cold 'full
Mousterian' times of the Lower Palæolithic habitation of the Thames. Here
we find the remarkable sheets of contorted 'drift' attributable to the
movements of the frozen soil and subsoil when exposed to the heat of the
summer sun. At the same time there may have been deposited along the
Thames the alluvial loams and gravels, occasionally containing stones and
rocks, which were brought down by ice-rafts; these low-level gravels are
not to be confused with the underlying 'old river-gravels' which contain the

Page 278

warm temperate hippopotamus fauna, for they were accumulated under
very cold conditions; they yield remains of the woolly rhinoceros and of the
mammoth. Thus, on the high levels of the Thames as well as on the low
levels we find evidences of the human culture and of the extinct fauna of
the period of the fourth great glaciation.

Fig. 100. Mousterian cavern
of Wildkirchli. After
Bächler. Entrances
indicated at 1, 2, and 3,
in the side of the
limestone cliff. Here, at a
height of 4,500 feet
above sea-level, Bächler
discovered proofs of
occupation by
Mousterian man in the
very heart of the Alpine
ice-fields of the Fourth
Glacial Stage.

Page 279

The upper waters of the Rhine and Danube were also frequented by late
Acheulean and early Mousterian flint workers. At a point far distant from
southern England there is the cavern of Wildkirchli on the Santis
Mountains, near Appenzell, in Switzerland; in Mousterian times this was in
the very heart of the north Alpine ice-field. The animal life here may
indicate that this cavern was open during the period of recession between
the two great advances of the fourth glaciation. Here, at a height of 4,500
feet, Bächler(19) between 1903-6, discovered proofs of occupation by
Neanderthal man during Mousterian times; the flints are not well formed;
the presence of crude bone implements may point to late Mousterian times;
but the flints are considered by Bächler to be of the same stage as those of
Le Moustier. It is asserted that when the Neanderthals followed the chase
here the climate was more genial, because the animals found include the
stag, Alpine wolf (Cyon alpinus fossilis), cave-bear, cave-lion, cave-leopard
(Felis pardus spelæa), badger, marten, and otter, together with the typical
Alpine forms, the ibex, chamois, and marmot. But this fauna alone can
hardly be taken as proof of a temperate climate, for at this Alpine height we
should not expect to discover the tundra life of the period; in fact, it is
entirely absent.

Page 280

Fig. 101. Entrance to the
grotto of Sirgenstein.
After R. R. Schmidt. "Of
all the stations along the
Danube by far the most
important is that of
Sirgenstein ... which was
first occupied by the
Neanderthals in early
Mousterian times and
continued to be visited
by the Lower and Upper
Palæolithic men until the
very close of the Upper
Palæolithic."

Page 281

Of all the stations along the Danube, by far the most important is that of
Sirgenstein, lying between the modern cities of Nuremberg and Augsburg,
which was first occupied by the Neanderthals in early Mousterian times and
continued to be visited by the Lower and Upper Palæolithic men until the
very close of the Upper Palæolithic. The continuous section of animal life
and of human culture which this remarkable cavern yields afforded
Schmidt,(20) who began his researches here in the spring of 1906, a key to
the prehistory of all the eighteen caverns in the region of the upper Danube
and upper Rhine. In Sirgenstein the primitive Mousterian culture of the
early Neanderthals was found, together with remains of the mammoth,
bison, reindeer, a species of wild horse, and the cave-bear; this Mousterian
industry closed with a record of the arrival in this region of the Obi
lemming from northern Russia. Later on the Crô-Magnon race of
Aurignacian times left on the floor of the cavern remains of their flint
industry and of their feasts, including the bones of the woolly rhinoceros,
mammoth, stag, and reindeer. During Upper Palæolithic Solutrean times the
cavern was not occupied; but early in Magdalenian times it was again
inhabited by man, and coincident with his return is the arrival of a great
migration of the banded lemming (Myodes torquatus) from the arctic
tundras of the north. Finally, toward the end of the Upper Palæolithic, in
late Magdalenian times, another climatic transition is indicated by the
appearance of the pika, or tailless hare (Lagomys pusillus). During the
Bronze Age this favorite grotto was again entered, and it was also inhabited
during a portion of the Iron Age. The débris of these various cultures,
hearths, and deposits of cave loam reach a total thickness of 8½ feet and
mark Sirgenstein as first in rank among the Palæolithic stations of Germany.

Types and Migrations of the Mammals Hunted by the Neanderthals
This is the life of the period of the fourth glaciation, when a very cold and
moist climate prevailed all over western Europe as far south as northern
Spain and northern Italy. While the glacial fields were not so extensive as
during the third or the second glaciation, the climate was very severe, as
indicated by the southward migration not only of the arctic flora but of the

Page 282

mammals and birds of the tundra region bordering the southern shores of
the Arctic Ocean. Two or three forms from the cold steppes of northern
Russia also found their way into western Europe, but this was distinctly not
a steppe period because of the prevailing moisture of the climate; in place
of the westerly winds and great dust clouds of closing Acheulean times,
cold mists and clouds heavy with moisture swept over the country, which
during the winters was at times buried in snow, and subject to rapid changes
of temperature. These climatic[AG] conditions appear to be demonstrated by
the predominance of the arctic tundra life, mammals which were adapted
only to severe weather and attracted by the northern flora.

Pl. V. The Neanderthal man
of La Chapelle-aux-

Page 283

Saints, inhabiting the
Dordogne region of
central France in
Mousterian times.
Antiquity estimated as
between 40,000 and
25,000 years. After the
restoration modelled by
J. H. McGregor. For the
bodily proportions of this
hunting race compare the
frontispiece, Pl. I.

The summers were undoubtedly warm like the present Arctic summers, but
very much longer in these southerly latitudes. It is not improbable that there
were seasonal migrations, northward and southward, of the mammoths,
rhinoceroses, and reindeer, and also that the northern flint quarries along the
Somme and the Marne may have been visited chiefly during the warm
summer season. The Asiatic mammals had entirely disappeared from the
regions of France and Germany during the first maximum of the fourth
glaciation, but there are some who maintain that during the amelioration of
climate that followed, an interval in the Alpine region termed the
Laufenschwankung by Penck, the straight-tusked elephant and Merck's
rhinoceros again migrated into northern France. It is true that occasionally
we find the bones of these animals in close association with those of the
woolly mammoth and the woolly rhinoceros. It is possible to explain such
intermingling either as having occurred during the advance of the fourth
glaciation, or as due to the northward and southward migration of the
respective herds of mammals in the summer and winter seasons. As the
period of the fourth glaciation continued it is certain that these Asiatic
mammals entirely disappeared.
At the same time the Neanderthals had passed through the first stage of
development of the Mousterian industry and had reached what is known as
the 'full' or 'high' Mousterian, which, with few exceptions, was carried on
under the shelter of the overhanging cliffs or within the grottos.

Page 284

The mammalian life of these 'full' Mousterian times, as found along the
headwaters of the Danube, the Rhine, and the branches of the Dordogne and
Vézère, is divided among the various faunal groups as follows:
Life of Middle Mousterian Times
Tundra Life.
Woolly mammoth.
Woolly rhinoceros.
Scandinavian reindeer.
Arctic fox.
Arctic hare.
Banded lemming.
Arctic ptarmigan.
Alpine Life.
Alpine marmot.
Ibex.
Alpine ptarmigan.
Steppe Life.
Steppe horse.
Steppe suslik.
Moor-hen.
Asiatic Life.
Cave-lion.
Cave-hyæna.
Cave-leopard.
Forest Life.
Stag, lynx, wolf, fox, water-vole, brown bear, giant deer.
Cave-bear.
Meadow Life.
Bison.
Wild cattle.
It would appear that the reindeer, the woolly mammoth, and the woolly
rhinoceros were already widely distributed over western Europe,

Page 285

accompanied by the arctic fox (Canis lagopus), the arctic hare (Lepus
variabilis), and the banded lemming (Myodes torquatus). There is no proof
that the musk-ox had at this time reached its extreme southerly distribution,
and it would appear that the arrival of the second type of northern lemming
from the region of the river Obi (Myodes obensis) did not occur until the
close of Mousterian times,(21) because the great migration of these animals
is recorded by their abundant remains in the so-called 'lower rodent layer' of
all the stations along the Rhine and Danube, such as Sirgenstein,
Wildscheuer, and Ofnet, after the final stage of Mousterian industry. In fact,
this remarkable little rodent appears to mark the second maximum or close
of the fourth glaciation by its migration all over western Europe, and
wherever its remains are found in the grotto deposits they furnish one of the
most important and positive of prehistoric dates, namely, that of the 'lower
rodent layer.' The lemmings surpass all other mammals in the great
distances covered by their migrations, and it would appear that this northern
species swept all over western Europe at the same time, leaving its remains
not only in the caverns along the Danube but in those of Belgium and of
Thiede, near Braunschweig. The latter station, Thiede, was not far from the
southern border of the Scandinavian glacier; it was subjected to a very
severe arctic climate, as the only associates of the Obi lemming were the
banded lemming, the arctic fox, the arctic hare, the reindeer, the mammoth,
and the musk-ox.

Page 286

Life of Late Mousterian Times
Second Maximum of Fourth Glaciation
Tundra, Steppe, Alpine, Asiatic and Meadow life, as above.
Obi lemming.
Musk-ox.
Ermine.
Arctic ptarmigan.
Eversmann's weasel (Steppe weasel).
The woolly mammoth now reaches the height of its evolution and specialization; as preserved in the frozen tundras
of northern Siberia, and as represented in very numerous drawings and engravings by the Upper Palæolithic artists,
it is the most completely known of all fossil mammalia.(22) Its proportions, as shown in the accompanying figure,
which represents the information gathered from all sources, are entirely different from those of either the Indian or
African elephant. The head is very high and surmounted by a great mass of hair and wool; behind this a sharp
depression separates the back of the head from the great hump on the back; the hinder portion of the back falls
away very rapidly and the tail is short; the overcoat of long hair nearly reaches the ground, and beneath this is a
warm undercoating of wool. It is not improbable that the humps on the head and the back were fat reservoirs. The
color of the hair was a yellowish brown, varying from light brown to pure brown; woolly hair, from an inch to an
inch and a half in length, covered the whole body interspersed with the shorter hairs was a large number of longer
and thicker hairs, which formed mane-like patches on the cheeks, chin, shoulders, flanks, and abdomen. A broad
fringe of this long hair extended along the sides of the body, as depicted in the work of the Upper Palæolithic
artists in the Combarelles Cave. Especially interesting to us is the food found in the stomach and mouth of the
frozen Siberian mammoths, which consists chiefly of a meadow flora such as flourishes during the summer in
northern Siberia at the present day, including grasses and sedges, wild thyme, beans of the wild oxytropis, also the
arctic variety of the upright crowfoot (Ranunculus acer). This was the summer food. The winter food undoubtedly
included the leaves and stems of the willow, the juniper, and other winter plants.

Fig. 102. The woolly mammoth (Elephas
primigenius) and the contemporary
Neanderthal hunters (Homo
neanderthalensis), after the drawings of
Upper Palæolithic artists and the frozen
mammoths found in northern Siberia. By
Charles R. Knight, 1915.

Page 287

The woolly rhinoceros was the invariable companion of the mammoth, even as Merck's rhinoceros always
associated itself with the straight-tusked elephant. This remarkable animal is related to the northern African group
of white rhinoceroses, from which it branched off at a very remote period. The profile of its very long, narrow
head, of its enormous anterior and lesser posterior horn, and its humped back resembles that of the existing African
form, but its protection against the arctic climate gave it a wholly different outward appearance; the hair of the
face, of a golden-brown color, with an undercovering of wool, is preserved in the Museum of Petrograd. Through a
discovery at Starunia, in eastern Galicia, in 1911, this animal is now completely known to us, except the tail; its
remains were found here at a depth of 30 feet, and included the head, left fore leg, and the skin of the left side of
the body. The Starunia specimen has a broad, truncated upper lip adapted to grazing habits, small oblique eyes,
long, narrow, and pointed ears, a long anterior horn with oval base, and a shorter posterior horn, a short neck, on
the back of which is a small, fleshy hump, quite independent of the skeleton; the legs are comparatively short. It
differs from the living African form in the somewhat narrower muzzle, in its small, pointed ears, and in the
presence of a thick coating of hair. Like the white rhinoceros, the woolly form was a plains dweller, living on grass
and small herbs.(23) This rhinoceros kept more closely to the borders of the great ice-sheets than did the mammoth,
arresting its migration in Germany and France; that is, it did not migrate so far to the south as the mammoth, which
wandered down into Italy as far as Rome.
The reindeer was the herald or forerunner of all the arctic tundra fauna; it reached the valley of the Vézère at the
beginning of the period of the true Mousterian culture and already had penetrated much farther south during the
Third Glacial Stage, probably migrating along the borders of the ice-fields; in fact, it is found in northern Europe
even during the second glaciation. It is the true Scandinavian or barren-ground species, which is now typified by
two forms of the Old World reindeer (R. tarandus, R. spitzbergensis), and by the existing American barren-ground
forms. The antlers are round, slender, and long in proportion to the relatively small size of the animal; the brow
tines are palmated. There is little proof that the Neanderthals made much use of the bones of the reindeer, but there
is every reason to suppose that they used the pelts, for the preparation of which the Mousterian scrapers and
planers were especially well fitted.

Fig. 103. The woolly rhinoceros (Rhinoceros
antiquitatis), after the drawings of
Palæolithic artists and the specimen
from Starunia preserved in the museum
of Lemberg, Galicia. By Charles R.
Knight, 1915.

Page 288

In the Iberian peninsula the tundra fauna did not penetrate as far south as Portugal, although the Norwegian
lemming (Myodes lemmus) reached the vicinity of Lisbon. The woolly mammoth, accompanied by the woolly
rhinoceros, has been discovered in two localities on the extreme northern coast of Spain, in the province of
Santander, bordering the Bay of Biscay. The reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) is found in the cavern of Seriña, south of
the Pyrenees; as early as Acheulean times it reached the region of Altamira, near Santander. Thus Harlé(24)
concludes it is certain that the tundra fauna spread from France westward into Catalonia, along the northern coast
of Spain, flanking the Pyrenees. It is generally believed that the cave-bear (Ursus spelæus) occupied many of the
caverns before their possession by man, and developed certain peculiarities of structure in these haunts. Thus the
phalanges bearing the claws are feebly developed, indicating that the claws had partly lost their prehensile
function; the anterior grinding-teeth are very much reduced, and the cusps of the posterior grinders are blunted in a
way which is indicative of an omnivorous diet; yet the front paws were of tremendous size, the body was thick-set
and of heavier proportions than that of the larger recent bears (Ursus arctos) of Europe. Hence, it would appear
that the Neanderthals drove out from the caves a type of bear less formidable than the existing species but
nevertheless a serious opponent to men armed with the small weapons of the Mousterian period.

Customs of the Chase and of Cave Life
We have only indirect means of knowing the courage and activity of the Neanderthals in the chase, through the
bones of animals hunted for food which are found intermingled with the flints around their ancient hearths. These
include in the early Mousterian hearths, as we have seen, bones of the bison, the wild cattle, and the horse, which
are followed at Combe-Capelle by the first appearance of the bones of the reindeer. The bones of the bison and of
the wild horse are both utilized in the bone anvils of the closing Mousterian culture at La Quina. What we believe
to be the period of the great mammalian life of the region of the upper Danube is found in the Mousterian levels of
the grotto of Sirgenstein, from which it would appear that the Neanderthals hunted the mammoth, the rhinoceros,
the wild horse, bison, and cattle, and the giant deer as well as the reindeer. We should keep in mind, however, that
when these caves were for a time deserted, the beasts of prey returned, and so it often happens that the succeeding
layers afford proofs of alternate occupation by man and by beasts of prey of sufficient size to bring in the larger
kinds of game, while owls may be responsible for the deposits of the lemming, as in the 'lower rodent layer.'
Obermaier(25) has given careful study to the vicissitudes of cave life in Mousterian times. Long before these caves
were inhabited by man, they served as lairs or refuges for the cave-bear and cave-hyæna, as well as for many birds
of prey. For example, the cave of Echenoz-la-Moline, on the upper waters of the Saône, contained the remains of
over eight hundred skeletons of the cave-bear, and no doubt it cost the Neanderthals many a hard-fought battle
before the beasts were driven out and man possessed himself of the grotto. Fire may have been the means
employed. It has been questioned whether the caves were not unhealthy dwelling-places, but it must be
remembered that, except in certain caverns which had natural openings through the roof for the exit of smoke,
there was no true cave life, but rather a grotto life, which centred around the entrance of the cave. The smallest
cave, this author observes, was considerably larger and better ventilated than the small, smoky cabins of some of
the European peasants, or the snow huts of the Eskimo. The most serious obstacle was the prevailing dampness,
which varied periodically in the caverns, so that dry seasons were succeeded by abundant moisture seeping
through the limestone roof and down the side walls. At such times the caverns were probably uninhabitable, and in
the bones of both men and beasts many instances have been observed of diseased swellings and of inflammation of
the vertebræ, such as are caused by extreme dampness. The compensating advantages were the shelter offered
from the rain and cold, a constant temperature at moderate distances from the entrance, and also the fact that the
caves were very easily defensible, because the entrance was generally small and the approach often steep and
difficult; a high stone wall across the opening would have made the defense still easier, and a flaming firebrand
would have prevented the approach of bears and other beasts of prey. On account of this shelter from the weather
and wild beasts the grottos and the larger openings of the caverns were certainly crowded with the Mousterian flint
workers during the inclement seasons of the year.
Yet the greater part of the life of the Neanderthals was undoubtedly passed in the open and in the chase.
Throughout Mousterian times the commonest game consisted of the wild horse, wild ox, and reindeer. Both flesh
and pelts were utilized, and the marrow was sought by splitting all the larger bones. Thus, frequently we find in the
hearths the remains of the mammoth, the woolly rhinoceros, the giant deer, the cave-bear, and the brown bear.
From these beasts of prey the Neanderthal hunters obtained pelts and perhaps also fat for torches used to light the
caverns; there is no proof of the invention of the lamp at this period.

Page 289

The work of the women undoubtedly consisted of preparing the meals and making the pelts into covers and
clothing. Whenever possible this would be done in the daylight outside of the grottos, but in chilly, rainy weather,
or the bitter cold of winter, the whole tribe would seek refuge in the grotto, gathering around the fire-hearths fed
with wood; odd corners would serve as storehouses for fuel or dried meat, preserved against the days when
extreme cold and blinding snow forbade the hunters to venture forth.
It appears that the game was dismembered where it fell and the best parts removed. The skull was split open for the
brain; the long bones were preserved for the marrow; thus the bones of the flank and shoulder of game occur
frequently in cave deposits, while the ribs and vertebræ are rare.
The pitfall may have been part of the hunting craft known to the Neanderthals. The chase was pursued with spears
or darts fitted with flint points, also by means of 'throwing stones,' which are found in great numbers in the upper
Mousterian levels of La Quina, in the Wolf Cave of Yonne, Les Cottés, and various places in Spain. If one
imagines, as is quite possible, that the throwing stone was placed in a leather sling or in the cleft end of a stick, or
fastened to a long leather thong, one can readily see it would prove a very effective weapon.
The methods of chase by the Neanderthals are, nevertheless, somewhat of a mystery. There was a very decided
disparity between the size and effectiveness of their weapons and the strength and resistance of the animals which
they pursued. None of the very heavy implements of Acheulean times was preserved; the dart and spear heads are
not greatly improved, certainly they could not penetrate the thick hides of the larger arctic tundra mammals,
heavily protected with hair and wool; the chase even of the horses, wild cattle, and reindeer was apparently
without the aid of the bow and arrow and prior to the invention of the barbed arrow or lance head.

Larger Image

Fig. 104. Geographic distribution of Pre-
Neanderthaloids and Neanderthaloids in
western Europe, showing the localities
where the remains of Pre-
Neanderthaloid races (Heidelberg and
Piltdown) and of true Neanderthaloids
have thus far been discovered. (Compare
table, p. 219.)

Discovery of the Neanderthaloid Races

Page 290

The open-air or nomadic life of all the tribes of western Europe from Pre-Chellean nearly to the close of Acheulean
times was very unfavorable to the preservation of human remains. It is possible that the bodies of the dead and of
the aged were thrown out to the hyænas which surrounded the stations, as among some of the tribes of Africa to-
day, but it is equally possible that they were interred in some manner. Skeletons buried near the surface in the river
sands or gravels of the 'terraces' would not have been preserved. We have seen that the preservation of the
Heidelberg and Piltdown remains was entirely due to chance, the bones having been washed down and mingled
with those of the animals; nor has any evidence been found in the grotto of Krapina of ceremonial burial or of
respect for the dead, but on the contrary there is some evidence of cannibalistic customs. Even before the close of
early Mousterian times all this was changed. Perhaps the closer association enforced by the more rigorous climate
indirectly produced greater respect for the dead and led to the custom of burial or the orderly laying out of the
remains of the dead in the floors of the partly protected grottos and caverns, to which custom we owe our present
knowledge of the structure of Neanderthal man in Mousterian times.

Fig. 105. Front view of the Neanderthaloid
skull found at Gibraltar in 1848—the
earliest discovery of a member of this
race, now regarded as the skull of a
woman. Photograph by A. Hrdlička from
the original specimen. One-quarter life
size.

The first discovery of a Neanderthaloid was made in 1848, eight years before the type of the Neanderthal race
came to light. This was the Gibraltar skull(26) found by Lieutenant Flint, near Forbes Quarry, on the north face of
the Rock of Gibraltar. It consists of a well-preserved skull, with the parietal bones only missing and the face and
base of the cranium remarkably complete. In 1868 it was presented by Busk to the Museum of the Royal College
of Surgeons, in London, where it lies to-day. The exact site of the discovery can no longer be positively identified;
it was probably found in a still existing cave, and although its archæologic age cannot be determined, yet as its
anatomical features are those of the Neanderthal race, and as all the remains of this race which can be dated with
certainty are of Mousterian age, it probably belongs to the Mousterian period. Of recent years its great importance
in the history of man has been revealed in the studies of Sollas, Keith, and Schwalbe. Thus it has come to be
ranked among the Neanderthaloids and is considered of a particularly primitive form, because of the extremely
small size of the brain. This feature and the slight development of the supraorbital ridges, so characteristic of the
Neanderthaloids, are explained by the theory that the skull belonged to a female.

Page 291

Fig. 106. Section of that part of the valley of
the Düssel known as the Neanderthal,
showing the location of the limestone
grotto where the Neanderthal skeleton
was discovered. Drawn by C. A. Reeds.

Sera(27) considers the Gibraltar skull to be the most ape-like of all human fossils and thinks it should not be classed
with the Neanderthaloids at all, but should be regarded as Pre-Neanderthaloid; this view is shared by Keith. Boule,
however, believes that this skull is of the same geologic age as that of Spy, La Chapelle, La Ferrassie, and La
Quina; everything leads us to believe,(28) he remarks, that the skull of Gibraltar is a female skull of Neanderthal
type. He elsewhere refers to the skulls of Gibraltar, of La Quina, and of La Ferrassie II as probably those of female
Neanderthals.

Fig. 107. The original type skull of
Neanderthal (left side) discovered in
1856. After Schwalbe. One-quarter life
size.

The type skull of this great extinct race of men is that of Neanderthal—certainly the most famous and the most
disputed of all anthropologic remains—appreciated by Lyell and Huxley, but passed over by Darwin, and finally
established by Schwalbe as the most important missing link between the existing species of man (Homo sapiens)
and the anthropoid apes. In 1856(29) some workmen were engaged in clearing a small loam-covered cave about six
feet in height, the so-called Feldhofner Grotto, in the cretaceous limestone of the valley known as the Neanderthal,
on the small stream Düssel flowing between Elberfeld and Düsseldorf. They discovered some human bones,
probably a complete skeleton representing an interment, which, unfortunately, were allowed to be scattered and

Page 292

crushed. Doctor Fuhlrott rescued the parts that remained, including the now famous skullcap, both thigh-bones, the
right upper-arm bone, portions of the lower arm, bones of both sides, the right collar-bone, and fragments of the
pelvis, shoulder-blade, and ribs. All the bones were perfectly preserved and are now to be found in the provincial
museum of Bonn.
The discovery made a great sensation, but at first the age of these fossils remained doubtful; some 150 paces from
the grotto, in a similar small cave were found bones of the cave-bear and rhinoceros. In 1858 Schaaffhausen's
memoir(30) appeared, in which he gave the first detailed description of these remains as belonging to a primitive
original race differing in every point from recent man, and he never wavered from this standpoint. In 1863(31)
Busk, Huxley, and Lyell also placed this skeleton in its true intermediate position between man and the anthropoid
apes. The determined opinion of Virchow that this was not a normal type of man exerted so great an influence that
not until the classic work of Schwalbe,(32) between 1899 and 1901, did this skeleton assume its commanding
importance for all time, and even this was subsequent to the discovery of two other Neanderthaloid races.
At first, quite erroneously, this was associated with the so-called race of Cannstatt, but long before Schwalbe's
work it was recognized by King,(33) in 1864, as a distinct species of man (Homo neanderthalensis) 'the man of the
Neander valley.' Not long after the discovery of the Neanderthaloids of Spy, in Belgium, Cope,(34) in 1893,
proposed the same specific name of Homo neanderthalensis. In 1897 Wilser(35) suggested the name of Homo
primigenius, which has been widely adopted in Germany, while among French authors the same species of man is
sometimes known to-day as Homo mousteriensis. This variety of names serves at least to record the unanimous
opinion that this mid-Pleistocene man belongs to a distinct species.
Since the race was very widely distributed, we may speak of these people as the 'Neanderthals,' while races
resembling the Neanderthal species may be characterized as 'Neanderthaloid.' The complete series of discoveries
of members of this race is now very large indeed.
DISTRIBUTION OF THE REMAINS OF THE NEANDERTHALS
(Compare Fig. 104)

1. Of Unknown Lower Palæolithic Times
1848. Gibraltar. Forbes Quarry. Fragmentary skull.
1856. Skullcap and skeletal
Neanderthal. Düsseldorf, Germany.
fragments.
1859. Arcy-sur-Cure. Yonne, France. 1 lower jaw.
1866. La Naulette. Belgium. 1 lower jaw.
1888. Malarnaud. Ariège, France. 1 lower jaw.
? Gourdan. Hautes-Pyrénées. 1 lower jaw.
1906. Ochos. Moravia. 1 lower jaw.

2. With Late Mousterian Industry
1887. Spy I, II. Near Dinant, Belgium. Two skulls and skeletons.
1907. Fragments of upper and
Petit-Puymoyen. Charente, France.
lower jaws.
1909. Pech de l'Azé. Dordogne, France. Skull of a child.
1910. La Ferrassie II. Dordogne, France. 1 skeleton (female).
1911. La Cotte de St. Brelade. Isle of Jersey. 13 human teeth.
1911. Skull and fragments of
La Quina II. Charente, France.
skeleton.

3. With Middle Mousterian Industry
1882. Šipka. Moravia. Jaw of a child.

Page 293

1908. Almost complete skull
La Chapelle-aux-Saints. Corrèze, France.
and skeleton.
1909. La Ferrassie I. Dordogne, France. Portions of one skeleton.
1910. La Quina I. Charente, France. Foot bones.

4. With Early Mousterian Industry
1908. Vézère Valley,
Le Moustier. Skeleton of a youth.
Dordogne, France.
1914. Ehringsdorf.(37) Near Weimar. Lower jaw.

5. With Mousterian or Acheulean Industry
1899. Portions of many
Croatia,
Krapina. skeletons of adults
Austria-Hungary.
and of children.
1892. Taubach. Near Weimar. 1 milk tooth.

In the year 1887 the Belgian geologists Fraipont and Lohest(36) discovered in a grotto near Spy, not far from
Dinant on the Meuse, the remains of two individuals which are now distinguished as Spy I and Spy II. In the same
stratum with the skeletons, beneath a layer of tufaceous limestone, flint implements of Mousterian age were
embedded, together with remains of the woolly mammoth, woolly rhinoceros, cave-bear, and cave-hyæna. This
discovery is one of the most important in the history of anthropology, because it definitely dated the Spy men as
belonging to the period of Mousterian industry, and also because the authors immediately recognized these men as
belonging to the race of Neanderthal and of Cannstatt, which at the time were supposed to be the same. Here for
the first time the proportions of the cranium and the brain, the very primitive features of the lower jaw and of the
teeth, the low stature, and several ape-like characters of the limb bones became known; here were observed the
prominent supraorbital ridges of the Neanderthal type, the receding forehead, the cranial profile inferior to that of
the lowest existing Australian races, the narrow, dolichocephalic skull. The limbs were found to have retained the
anthropoid disproportion between the thigh-bone and the shin-bone, and the important discovery was made that
this short, massively built, heavy-browed, dull-visaged Neanderthal man was unable to stand absolutely erect, the
structure of the knee-joint being such that the knees were constantly slightly bent. In other words, the Spy man had
not yet fully acquired the erect position of the lower limbs.

Page 294

Fig. 108. Skull known as Spy I, discovered in
1887, in front of the grotto of Spy, near
Namur, Belgium. After Kraemer. One-
quarter life size.

This discovery may be said to have established the Neanderthals in all their characters as a very distinct low race,
but twenty-two years elapsed before this was further confirmed by the finding of another and still earlier type of
Neanderthaloid at Krapina, in northern Croatia, Austria-Hungary, as described at the close of Chapter II (p. 181
above); a type which with its local variations was soon determined as unquestionably belonging in the same group
with the man of Neanderthal and the men of Spy.
Many years before, namely, in 1866, the Belgian anthropologist Dupont(38) had discovered the remains of another
member of this race in a grotto on the bank of the River Lesse, near La Naulette, not far from Furfooz, in northern
Belgium. This is now known as the La Naulette jaw and is found to be of Neanderthal type. It was associated with
bones of the woolly mammoth, the rhinoceros, the reindeer, and a few fragments of other human bones.
Again, in 1882, Mas̆ ka(39) found in a cave near Šipka, in Moravia, south of Sternberg, and six miles east of
Neutitschein, fragments of a child's lower jaw, extraordinarily strong, thick, and large, and showing the incoming
of the permanent teeth. From this very same region is the jaw of Ochos, Moravia, found by Rzehak(40) about 1906.
Only the alveolar part of the jaw was found, but it served to demonstrate the very wide geographical distribution of
the Neanderthal race.
At this time the Dordogne region, long known to be an intensive centre of Mousterian industry, from the time of
Lartet's discovery of Le Moustier, in 1863, had not yielded a single skeleton, or any anatomical evidence of the
type of man which in Mousterian times inhabited it. But beginning in the spring of 1908 there came in succession a
whole series of such discoveries, mostly of ceremonial burials, at La Chapelle-aux-Saints, at the type station of Le
Moustier itself, at La Ferrassie, another station on the lower Vézère, and at La Quina.
In October, 1910, was discovered the skull known as La Ferrassie II, of late Mousterian age; it is probably that of a
female, and the remains were arranged in what was presumably a special form of ceremonial burial, because the
bones, instead of being laid out straight in a certain direction, were in a crouching or flexed position.
The Le Moustier skeleton was found by Hauser in the lower grotto of Le Moustier, in the Vézère valley, in the
spring of 1908, and carefully removed with the aid of Professor Klaatsch.(41) It belonged to a youth some sixteen
years of age. The most interesting feature of the discovery was the manner in which the skeleton was laid out.(42)
The head rested on a number of flint fragments carefully piled together—a sort of stone pillow; the dead lay in a
sleeping posture, with the head resting on the right forearm. An exceptionally fine coup de poing was close by the
hand, and numerous charred and split bones of wild cattle (Bos primigenius) were placed around, indicative of a
food offering. The flints were believed to belong to the Acheulean stage, which underlies the layer of true
Mousterian industry, long known in this locality; but by French archæologists and by Schmidt these implements
are regarded as of the earliest Mousterian age, in which it is well known that the Acheulean coup de poing still
persisted. Unfortunately, the skeleton was not very well preserved and, while Klaatsch was entirely justified in
classifying it with the Neanderthaloids, it should be regarded not as a distinct species (Homo mousteriensis
hauseri) but rather as a member of the true Neanderthal race (Homo neanderthalensis). It also proves to be a rather
stocky individual, robust and of low stature: the arms and legs are relatively short, especially the forearm and the
shin-bone.

Page 295

Fig. 109. Grotto of La Chapelle-aux-Saints,
Corrèze, a few miles to the eastward of
Le Moustier. After Boule.

Fig. 110. Entrance to the grotto of La
Chapelle-aux-Saints, where the finest of
all the Neanderthaloid fossils was
discovered in 1908. After Boule.

At the same time that the skeleton of Le Moustier was being disinterred, the Abbés A. and J. Bouyssonie, and L.
Bardon(43) were exploring the Mousterian culture of the grotto near La Chapelle-aux-Saints, a few miles to the
eastward of Le Moustier, and came upon a skeleton which has proved to be by far the finest of all the
Neanderthaloid fossils, including a remarkably well-preserved skull, almost the entire back-bone, twenty ribs,
bones of the arm and of the greater part of the leg, and a number of the bones of the hands and feet. This was also a
ceremonial burial of an individual between fifty and fifty-five years of age, most carefully laid out in an east-and-
west direction in a small, natural depression. With it were found typical Mousterian flints, also a number of shells
and remains chiefly of the woolly rhinoceros, the horse, the reindeer, and the bison. The finding of a mature skull
with the bones of the face in position, and in a relatively perfect state of preservation without distortion of the
entire cranium, afforded for the first time the opportunity of finally determining not only all the skeletal characters

Page 296

and proportions of Neanderthal man but also the actual size and proportions of the brain. This superb specimen
was sent to the Paris Museum, and Boule's preliminary descriptions(44) and finally his almost faultless
monograph(45) aroused world-wide interest in the Neanderthal race.

Fig. 111. The Neanderthaloid skull from La
Chapelle-aux-Saints—side, front and top
views. After Boule. One-quarter life
size.

A year later a third Neanderthal skeleton was discovered in the cave of La Ferrassie not far from Le Bugue,
Dordogne, by Peyrony. The bones were badly shattered, and the proofs of ceremonial burial were not perfectly
clear, but at a glance the skeleton was clearly recognized from the characters of the skull, and particularly from
those of the forehead, as belonging to the Neanderthal race.
In the succeeding year, 1910, in the cavern of La Quina, Department of Charente, to the north of the Vézère
region(46) were found the foot bones of a man precisely resembling the La Chapelle type, and again in 1911 several
parts of the skeleton of another entirely typical member of the Neanderthal race were discovered in the earliest
Mousterian strata. The skull bones were somewhat separated at the sutures. This was certainly not a case of
ceremonial burial. Like the Gibraltar skull, this is supposed to be that of a female.

Page 297

Fig. 112. Human teeth of Neanderthaloid
type, discovered in a cave on the Isle of
Jersey. After Marett and Hrdlička.

Of especial geographic interest is the discovery by Nicolle and Sinel(47) of thirteen human teeth in a Mousterian
cavern on St. Brelade's Bay, on the Island of Jersey,(48) which furnishes proof of the extension of the Neanderthal
race to the Channel Islands, when these were, in all probability, still a part of the mainland. The teeth were
associated with bones of the woolly rhinoceros, of the reindeer, and of two varieties of the horse, as well as with
evidences of Mousterian hearths and flint implements. The distinctive features of the Neanderthal grinding-teeth
are the stout size, deep implantation, and expanded form of the roots, which, with the heavy jaw, point to the
toughness of the food and to the muscular strength exerted in mastication. The roots, instead of tapering to a point
below, as in modern man, form a broad, stout column, supporting the crown, adapted to a sweeping motion of the
jaw. This special feature alone would exclude the Neanderthals from the ancestry of the higher races.
Thus, through a long series of discoveries, beginning in 1848 and rapidly multiplying during the last few years, we
have found the materials for a complete knowledge of the skeletal structure of the men, women, and children of the
Neanderthal race; we know the relative brain development as well as the stature of the sexes; we have determined
that this race, and this only, extended over all western Europe during late Acheulean and the entire period of
Mousterian times, and we have also learned that it was a race imbued with reverence for the dead and therefore
probably animated by the belief in some form of future existence.

Characters of the Neanderthal Race
The skulls and skeletons(49) of Neanderthal, Spy, Krapina, Le Moustier, La Chapelle, La Ferrassie, and Gibraltar
have so many distinctive features in common that it is beyond question that they must be classed in a closely
related group. The distinctive features of this group are:
First, features found also in the different existing races of man, but never in the anthropoid apes, and therefore
human; second, features, all of which have never been found combined in any race of recent man, the group,
therefore, represents a distinct species of man; third, features outside of the limits of variation in the recent races of
man, and intermediate between them and the variation limits of the anthropoid apes.
Before looking at Neanderthal man as a whole, we may turn our attention especially to a number of these peculiar
features of the race. All the earliest observers were impressed by the heavy, overhanging brows and retreating
forehead. In recent man there is often a decided prominence above the eyes, from the glabella or median point
above the nose outward toward each side, but generally the outer third of the margin of these prominences turns
upward beneath the outer line of the eyebrows. In the Neanderthals, on the contrary, these prominences beneath the
eyebrows surround the whole upper edge of the eye socket, extending outward around the external borders of the
forehead, so that they may be called 'tori supraorbitales'; the extent of this prominent ridge above and to the sides
forms a veritable roof over the eye sockets, which appear like two deep, lateral caverns. Such lateral prominences
do occur, though rarely, in recent man; they are observed, for example, in certain Australians.

Page 298

Fig. 113. Skulls of a chimpanzee (left), of La
Chapelle-aux-Saints (centre), and of a
modern Frenchman (right), showing the
gradual disappearance of the eyebrow
ridges and projecting face. After Boule.

The front view of the Neanderthal face, as seen in the female Gibraltar skull, in which these eyebrow ridges are by
no means so prominent as in the male skulls, is no less remarkable for the great height of the face as compared
with the flatness of the forehead. Placing the skull side by side with that of the Australian,(50) we observe at once
the enormous difference in the proportions of the face and the cranium in these two types, although the Australian
represents one of the lowest existing races of Homo sapiens; we observe in the Gibraltar skull the very wide space
between the eyes and the very large size of the narial opening, which indicate a broad, flattened nose; there is a
correspondingly long space between the bottom of the narial opening and the line for the insertion of the incisor
teeth, indicating a very long upper lip.
The jaw is less powerful than that of the Heidelberg man. The Heidelberg jaw we have seen to be distinguished by
its general strength and clumsiness and its lack of chin, or rather a chin without the slightest indication of a
prominence; on the inside of this very thick, rounded chin plate, the characteristic chin spine (spina mentalis) is
lacking; instead, a double groove is present as the point of attachment for the muscles which connect the chin and
tongue with the hyoid bone; the ascending process for the attachment of the muscles of the jaw is seen to be
unusually broad, 60 mm., in contrast to about 37 mm. in the recent jaw; finally, the condyle for attachment with the
skull is particularly large.(51)

Page 299

Fig. 114. Face view of the Gibraltar skull
(left) and of a modern Australian skull
(right), displaying the high, large visage
of the former, which suggests that of the
anthropoid apes. After Schwalbe. One-
quarter life size. The comparative
horizontal lines are across the (a)
nasion, or root of the nose, the (b) lower
edges of the orbits, and the (c) lower
edge of the nasal aperture.

Like the Heidelberg jaw, that of the Neanderthals is distinguished by great thickness and massiveness. In general
the contours are similar; in a few instances the chin process is suggested by a slight prominence, but in general the
chin is strongly receding, and it agrees with that of Heidelberg in lacking the spina mentalis. In other
characteristics there are decided differences in the Heidelberg and Neanderthal jaws. The form of the latter is now
known from the specimens of Krapina, of Spy, of La Naulette, of Ochos, and of Šipka, and from the perfect
examples of Le Moustier and La Chapelle. The Šipka specimen proves that even in a child ten years of age the jaw
was remarkable for thickness and strength. Boule(52) entirely agrees with Gorjanovič-Kramberger(53) that the chin
in the Neanderthal jaw was only in process of formation, and throughout life attained no more than an infantile
form, that the Neanderthals may be ranked, however, as Homines mentales, whereas the Heidelbergs, in which the
chin is entirely lacking, may be regarded as Homines amentales.
The proportions of the teeth in the Neanderthals are equally distinctive, especially in the size of the true grinders
and cutting teeth. As in the Heidelberg jaw, they form a closely set row, from which the canine does not project as
in the Piltdown dentition; in fact, the contour of the jaw and the proportions of the teeth are distinctly human when
compared with the orang-like jaw of the Piltdown man. The grinding surface of the teeth has many layers of
enamel, and the cusps are well developed. Unlike those of recent man, the incisors display folds of enamel on the
inner or lingual surfaces, a condition rarely observed in the modern cutting teeth. In the teeth of the Heidelberg
jaw, the pulp cavities are exceptionally large, whereas in the teeth of the Krapina race there is the unique feature
that the molars have no normal roots, the roots having been more or less absorbed, a very rare occurrence in recent
man. The dentition of La Chapelle is also distinctly human, but extraordinarily massive, corresponding with the
general massiveness of the skull and masticating apparatus; in detail it is not that of civilized races, but an
exaggerated form of the type called macrodont.(54) The elongation of the crown is also similar to what is termed
hypsodont.
The grinding-teeth do not all show this massive size and columnar form, for about fifty per cent of the Krapina
teeth have distinct roots and are more like normal modern grinders. In the Neanderthaloids of Spy the teeth are
small and the roots are of moderate size.(55)
This study of the forehead and of the eyebrow ridges, of the great depth of the face, and of the peculiarly high,
square form of the eye sockets prepares us for a profile view of the skull of La Chapelle in contrast with that of the
most highly developed and intellectual European type, namely, the profile of the distinguished American
palæontologist, the late Professor Edward D. Cope, who bequeathed his skull and skeleton for purposes of

Page 300

scientific study and comparison. In La Chapelle we at once notice the platycephaly, or flattening of the skullcap,
the retreating forehead, the great prominence of the eyebrow ridges resembling that of the anthropoid apes, the
lengthening of the face as compared with the flattening of the cranium, the great prominence or prognathism of the
face as a whole, and the special prominence of the rows of cutting teeth as compared with the vertical or indrawn
line, and the recession of the tooth row in the Cope profile. This comparison also brings out the striking contrast
between the high chin prominence of Homo sapiens and the deeply receding chin of the Neanderthals. The contrast
is hardly less remarkable in the superior view of the skull in which the Neanderthal type is seen to be extremely
dolichocephalic, the back of the skull being relatively broad and the front narrowing in the region of the forebrain
until it suddenly expands in the prominent supraorbital processes.

Fig. 115. Skull of La Chapelle-aux-Saints
(outline) in comparison with that of a
high modern type (shaded); illustrating
the projecting eyebrows and
prognathous, ape-like face of the
Neanderthaloids. After Boule. One-
quarter life size.

As shown in the diagram on page 8, Fig. 1, the greatest length of the Neanderthal skull is found on the horizontal
line directly through the brain chamber, known as the glabella-inion line, a line drawn from a prominence between
the eyebrow ridges to a point at the back of the skull known as the external occipital protuberance, or inion. This is
also the longest line in the skulls of Spy and of La Chapelle, as well as of the anthropoid apes,(56) but in the north
Australian skull, Fig. 1, owing to the greater expansion of the upper part of the brain, the greatest length of the
skull is at a point considerably above the glabella-inion line. The median section of the skull of the chimpanzee, of
the Neanderthal, and of the north Australian displays in a very striking manner the generalization made by
Schwalbe, in 1901, that the Neanderthal skull is truly an intermediate or half-way form between that of the
anthropoid apes and that of Homo sapiens. We observe in this illuminating section the growth of the dome of the
skull, that is, the great brain-bearing cavity above the glabella-inion line g-i, by noting the contrast in the length of
the vertical line of the cranial height, as compared with the space below the glabella-inion line indicated by the
letters. This very important vertical line terminates below at the opening, where the spinal cord enters the base of
the brain (see Fig. 1).

Page 301

Fig. 116. Top view of three skulls—of a
chimpanzee (left), of the man of La
Chapelle-aux-Saints (centre), and of a
modern Frenchman (right)—showing
the retreat of the projecting face and
prominent eyebrow ridges. After Boule.

In many characteristics the Neanderthal skull is shown to be nearer to that of the anthropoid apes than to that of
Homo sapiens. This conclusion arrived at by Schwalbe, in 1901,(57) has been more than confirmed by Boule's
masterly study(58) of the very complete skull of La Chapelle. After his detailed review, he concludes: As to the
unity of the Neanderthal head form, these features are not peculiar to the skull of La Chapelle; in every case they
are also found in the skulls of Neanderthal, Gibraltar, Spy, Krapina, La Ferrassie, which witness to the
homogeneity of that human fossil type called Neanderthal. These features show a structural affinity between the
fossil men of the Mousterian period and the anthropoid apes. It must be noted that many of these features may be
found also in recent human skulls of the inferior races, but that they are very rare, very scattered, very isolated, and
occur only as aberrations. It is the accumulation of all these features in every skull of a whole series which
constitutes an assemblage entirely new and of great importance. In the skull, as in other parts of the anatomy of the
Neanderthals, we should not expect to find every character intermediate between the anthropoids and recent man.
The long Neanderthal face is somewhat similar to that of the Eskimo and is in contrast with the very short face of
the existing Australians and Tasmanians. The depression at the root of the nose, just below the glabella, is very
marked in all Neanderthals; there is less of the nose bridge than in any recent races, except those of the male
Australians, yet the nose is not flattened but somewhat arched or aquiline. This feature is not characteristic of all
the anthropoid apes, and in this respect the Neanderthals, Australians, and Tasmanians are more different from the
anthropoid apes than are some of the white races; thus the Neanderthal nose, far from resembling that of the
anthropoids, differs from it more than does that of some recent human types.(59) Many anatomists, following
Huxley, have described the Australian and Tasmanian skulls as more or less Neanderthaloid, and some authors
have gone so far as to regard these races as surviving Neanderthals. It is true that some of the skulls in these
existing races are extraordinarily platycephalic and show a retreating forehead, that others show supraorbital ridges
almost as prominent as in the Neanderthals, that sometimes the prominence of the occipital inion is very marked,
that certain jaws show a very retreating chin. Thus one or another of these Neanderthal features has been observed
in these lower existing races, but all of these characteristics have never been combined in one race as constant
features, and invariably associated, as in all the skulls of the Neanderthals known to us.

Page 302

Fig. 117. Scale of ascent indicated in the skull
form of eleven races of fossil and living
men, based on the result of twelve
different characters of comparison. At
the bottom stands the anthropoid ape,
and above this Pithecanthropus, the ape-
man of Java. A wide range is observed
between the Neanderthaloid skulls of
Gibraltar and of Spy-Neanderthal. Not
far above these in the scale of ascent
stand the modern Australians and the
recently extinct Tasmanians. Above
these low races are found the fossil
Upper Palæolithic races of Galley Hill,
Brüx, Brünn, and Předmost. At the top
stand the modern European races, beside
which the Upper Palæolithic Crô-
Magnon race takes a high rank. After
Büchner.

In brief, the Australian type of head has nothing in common with that of the Neanderthals except in a small number
of characteristics in the region of the forehead and of the nose. The distinguishing traits of the Neanderthal head
and face are platycephaly, a retreating forehead, flattening of the occiput or lower portion of the skull, prominence
of the supraorbital ridges, chin retreating or lacking, projection of the entire face owing to the peculiar form of the
upper jaw, and the relatively small size of the frontal lobes of the brain. In fact, concludes Boule: "All these
modern so-called 'Neanderthaloids' are nothing but varieties of individuals of Homo sapiens, remarkable for the
accidental exaggeration of certain anatomical traits which are normally developed in all specimens of Homo
neanderthalensis. The simplest explanation of these accidents in most cases is atavism or reversion. We cannot
assert that there has never been an infusion of Neanderthaloid blood in the groups belonging to species Homo
sapiens, but what seems to be quite certain is that any such infusion can have been only accidental, for there is no
recent type which can be considered even as a modified direct descendant of the Neanderthals."

Page 303

This opinion is confirmed by the latest and most exhaustive researches of Berry and Robertson,(60) who conclude
that neither Australians nor Tasmanians have any direct relationship with Homo neanderthalensis; the superficial
points of cranial resemblance are explicable solely on the grounds of the remoteness of the ancestry. The
Australians and Tasmanians are descendants not of the Neanderthal stock but of a late Pliocene or early
Pleistocene stock, which, following Sergi, may be called Homo sapiens tasmanianus, of which the Tasmanian
aboriginal, now extinct, was the almost unchanged offspring. In respect to 'low' characters, as shown in the
diagram, Fig. 117, the Spy-Neanderthal skulls stand quite close to the Tasmanians and Australians, and the
Gibraltar skull stands midway between this type and Pithecanthropus with respect to twelve different characters of
comparison.
It is interesting to note[AH] that the Tasmanians were found in a stage of flint industry very similar to that practised
by the Neanderthals in Mousterian times; their flints were made from artificially produced flakes, including a few
examples(61) that exhibited a neatness of edge trimming and resultant regularity of outline, whereas the greater part
were characterized by an unskilful trimming and irregular outline; the low status of the Tasmanian implements can
most correctly be described by the word Pre-Aurignacian, that is, of Mousterian or of an earlier stage, but not by
any means 'Eolithic.'

Fig. 118. The Neanderthaloid skull of La
Chapelle-aux-Saints, with the right half
removed to show the shape of the brain,
as restored by J. H. McGregor. One-
quarter life size.

Page 304

Fig. 119. Outline of the left side of the
Neanderthaloid brain of La Chapelle-
aux-Saints, compared with similar brain
outlines of a chimpanzee and of a high
type of modern man. One-third life size.

The brain of Neanderthal man was known to be of large size even when estimated from the original skullcap of the
Neanderthal type. Darwin was compelled to admit that the famous skull of Neanderthal was well developed and
capacious, and Broca offered an ingenious explanation of the otherwise inexplicable fact that the mean capacity of
the skull of the ancient cave-dweller is greater than that of many modern Frenchmen, namely, that the average
capacity of the skull in civilized nations must be lowered by the preservation of a considerable number of
individuals, weak in mind and body, who would have been promptly eliminated in the savage state, whereas
among savages the average includes only the more capable individuals who have been able to survive under
extremely hard conditions of life. The skulls of La Chapelle and of Spy afforded an opportunity of determining this
very interesting problem, and the results entirely confirm the earlier estimates of Schaaffhausen and of Broca as to
the great cubic capacity of the Neanderthal brain. The estimates in descending order are as follows:

Skull of Spy II (Fraipont) ? 1723 c.cm.
" La Chapelle (Boule, Verneau, and Rivet) 1626 "
" Spy I (Fraipont) ? 1562 "
" Neanderthal 1408 "
" La Quina, female (Boule approximation) 1367 "
" Gibraltar, female (Boule estimate) 1296 "

Page 305

Fig. 120. Brains of Lower and Upper
Palæolithic races compared (top and left
side views). Piltdown (left), as restored
by J. H. McGregor; Neanderthal (centre)
brain, cast from the type skull; Combe-
Capelle (right) from the base of the
Upper Palæolithic, after Klaatsch. The
Combe-Capelle brain, though
unnaturally compressed, shows a
relatively broad frontal area. One-
quarter life size.

The size of the brain in the existing races of Homo sapiens varies from 950 c.cm. to 2020 c.cm.(63) Thus in respect
to the volume of cerebral matter the brain of the Neanderthal man is surely human, but in form the brain lacks the
proportions characteristic of the superior organization of the brain in recent man. In another important respect it is
human: in the larger size of the left hemisphere, indicating the development of the use of the right hand. In its
general form the brain is more like that of the anthropoid apes in the relatively smaller size of the frontal portion,
in the simplicity and length of the convolutions, and in the position and direction of the great fissures at the side
known as the 'fissures of Sylvius' and of 'Rolando.' As studied by Boule and Anthony(64) there are many primitive
characteristics in the brain of the Neanderthals. The front of the forebrain, the so-called prefrontal area, which is
the seat of the higher faculties, is not fully developed but has a protuberance as in the brain of the anthropoids. The
left frontal lobe in particular, which is associated with the power of speech, is not much developed in the lower
part, so that a limited development of the faculty of speech is inferred. The lateral fissure of Sylvius is relatively
wide and open, and this and other features suggest the brain of the anthropoid. The brain of the skull of La Quina,
which is believed to be that of a female, also shows many primitive features.(65) The absolute cubic capacity of the
brain is less significant of intelligence than the relative development of those portions of the brain which are
concerned in the higher processes of the mind.
The stature of the various examples of the Neanderthal race is estimated somewhat differently by Boule and by
Manouvrier, and also varies with the sex:

Neanderthal (Boule) 1.55 m. 5 ft. 1 in.
" (Manouvrier) 1.632 m. 5 ft. 4⅕ in.
La Chapelle (Boule) 1.57 m. 5 ft. 1⅘ in.
" (Manouvrier) 1.611 m. 5 ft. 3⅖ in.

Page 306

Spy (Manouvrier) 1.633 m. 5 ft. 43⁄10 in.
La Ferrassie I (Manouvrier) 1.657 m. 5 ft. 5⅕ in.
Average of Neanderthals supposed male 1.633 m. 5 ft. 43⁄10 in.
La Ferrassie II (female) 1.482 m. 4 ft. 103⁄10 in.

The Neanderthal head is very large in proportion to the short, thick-set body, which we observe rarely exceeds 5
feet 5 inches in height in the male, and 4 feet 10 inches in the female. The proportions of the body and limbs of the
Neanderthals throw a surprising light on their ancestral history as well as upon their defects as a race dependent
upon the chase. In proportion to the length of the thigh, the lower leg is much shorter than in any existing human
race. The tibia or shin-bone is only 76.6 per cent of the length of the femur or thigh-bone, whereas in the existing
races with the shortest shin-bone, such as the Eskimos and the majority of the yellow races, it is never less than 80
per cent of the length of the thigh-bone. In this respect the Neanderthal man is not like the anthropoid apes but has
a relatively shorter shin-bone, because the gorillas have an index of 80.6 per cent, the chimpanzees of 82 per cent,
the orangs and gibbons of above 83 per cent; thus all the anthropoid apes and the lower races of man have a
relatively longer leg from the knee down than has the Neanderthal race.

Fig. 121. Skeleton of the Neanderthaloid man
of La Chapelle-aux-Saints. About one-
seventeenth life size. After Boule.

The shortness of the shin-bone as compared with the length of the thigh-bone is proof that the Neanderthals were
very clumsy and slow of foot, because this proportion is characteristic of all slow-moving animals, whereas a long
shin-bone and a short thigh-bone indicate that a race is naturally fleet of foot.
Similarly the Neanderthal man has a very short forearm, only 73.8 per cent of the upper arm; it approaches the
proportions seen in the Eskimos, Lapps, and Bushmen.(66) Here, again, the Neanderthal man differs from the
anthropoid apes, among which the shortest forearm is that of the gorilla, having a ratio of 80 per cent.
There are other features which would tend to show that the ancestors of the Neanderthaloids had been ground
dwellers rather than tree dwellers back into a very remote period of geologic time; the arms are much shorter than

Page 307

the legs, whereas in tree dwellers they are much longer. Thus, we have observed in the anthropoid apes that the
arm is very long in proportion to the leg; in the chimpanzee, which has relatively the shortest arms among the
anthropoid apes, the index is 104 per cent, that is, the arms are slightly longer than the legs. On the contrary, in the
Neanderthals the arm length is only 68 per cent of the leg length; thus it is very far removed from the anthropoid-
ape type and comes nearest to the Australian and African negro types.
Thus, to sum up the bodily proportions of the Neanderthals:
Arm short in proportion to leg, average index 68 per cent.
Forearm short in proportion to upper arm, average index 73.8 per cent.
Shin-bone short in proportion to thigh-bone, average index 76.6 per cent.
Stature extremely short in proportion to size of head.
The structure of the shoulder and of the chest is full of interest. All the ribs are remarkably robust and of large
volume, and, whereas in existing races they exhibit a flattened section, in the Neanderthals the section is distinctly
triangular in form. This implies a very muscular and robust torso in correlation with the gigantic head and stout
limbs. The collar-bones are correspondingly long, presenting a ratio to the humerus exceeding 54 per cent, which
is much higher than that among the average existing races; this indicates a very broad shoulder. The shoulder-blade
is also very different in type from that of the higher races of men, and even from that of the higher Primates; it is
extremely short and broad.
While, as noted above, the arm of the Neanderthals is relatively short and thus non-anthropoid, it presents a
mingling of human and ape characters. The upper arm, or humerus, is truly of the human type, the torsion angle
upon its axis being 148°, whereas in the anthropoid apes the angle of torsion never passes 141°. Among the bones
of the lower arm the most significant is the radius, with which the turning movement of the hand is correlated; the
structure of the head of the radius has more resemblance to that of the anthropoid apes than to that of existing
species of man. The structure of the other bone of the forearm, the ulna, is also very primitive, exhibiting certain
monkey characteristics.

Fig. 122. Thigh-bones, or femora, of the
Trinil, Neanderthal, and Crô-Magnon
races, compared with one of modern
type. The Neanderthal femur seems to be
short and stout, whereas that attributed
to Pithecanthropus is relatively long,
slender, and straight. Of the femora

Page 308

illustrated the Neanderthal and Trinil are
those of the type specimens, the Crô-
Magnon is from the skeletal fragments
of La Madeleine. After Dubois, Boule,
Lartet, and Christy. One-eighth life size.

The structure of the hand is a matter of the highest interest in connection with the implement-making powers of the
Neanderthals. The hand is remarkably large and robust, comparable in size with that of men of very large stature in
existing races. With respect to the opposition power of the thumb against the fingers by means of the opponens
muscle, a distinctively human characteristic, the stage of Neanderthal development is decidedly lower than that of
existing races, because the joint of the metacarpal bone which supports the thumb is of a peculiar form, convex,
and presenting a veritable convex condyle, whereas in the existing human races the articular surface of the upper
part of the thumb joint is saddle-shaped, that is, concave from within backward, and convex from without inward.
Thus the highly perfected motions of the thumb in Homo sapiens were not attained in Homo neanderthalensis.
Two phalanges which are preserved in the Chapelle-aux-Saints skeleton show that the fingers were relatively short
and robust.
In the structure of the hip-girdle our fossil man is altogether human; nevertheless, some of its characters are very
primitive and distinctive.
Similarly, the thigh-bone shows several primitive characters which are only rarely seen in existing races, such as
the third trochanter and the strong, general forward curvature.
The structure of the knee-joint in relation to the shin-bone is very peculiar, because it shows that the shin was
always retroverted or bent backward. Two other features of the shin-bone are its extreme abbreviation as compared
with the femur, and the absence of flattening, or platycnemism. Where the shin-bone joins the ankle-bone
(astragalus) are shown two facets, such as are preserved only in those races of existing men which have retained
the habit of squatting or the folded position of the limbs; these facets are not found in races which have the habit of
sitting. They indicate that the resting position of the Neanderthals while engaged in industrial work was squatting,
as shown in our restoration of one of the Neanderthals at Le Moustier.
Associated with these powerful and peculiarly shaped limbs is the particularly short and thick-set vertebral
column, each bone of which is remarkable for its abbreviation. The neck especially is entirely different in
construction from that of existing races of men. It would appear that the concave curvature of the back in the
Neanderthals was carried directly upward and continued into the concave curvature of the neck, as among the
anthropoid apes, and especially in the chimpanzee. The vertebræ of the neck, especially the fifth, sixth, and
seventh, and the first dorsal, resemble those of the chimpanzee far more closely than those of the modern
European; the spinous processes are directed backward instead of downward. This caused the habitual stooping of
Neanderthal man at the neck and shoulders and prevented him from ever holding his head entirely erect. Whereas
in the back-bone of existing races the erect position is maintained by four graceful curvatures, two toward the
front, and two toward the back, in the Neanderthals, as in the newly-born members of the higher races, we observe
only three curvatures, two concave toward the front, namely, the back and neck curvature, just described, and a
sacral or pelvic curvature; there is also a convex lumbar curvature in the lower part of the Neanderthal back-bone,
which, however, is less pronounced than in existing species of man.

Page 309

Fig. 123. Restoration of the head of the
Neanderthal man of La Chapelle-aux-
Saints, in profile, after model by J. H.
McGregor. One-quarter life size.

Summing up the characters of the back-bone in the Neanderthals, certain of them are very primitive, such as the
structure of the vertebræ of the neck and the robust development of the spinous processes, the absence of marked
curvature in the lower part of the back-bone and the very gentle curvature of the bones of the sacrum.

Page 310

Fig. 124. Restoration of the head of the
Neanderthal man of La Chapelle-aux-
Saints, in front view, after model by J.
H. McGregor. One-quarter life size.

The total aspect of Neanderthal man may be characterized in the following manner:(67) An enormous head placed
upon a short and thick trunk, with limbs very short and thick-set, and very robust; the shoulders broad and
stooping, with the head and neck habitually bent forward into the same curvature as the back; the arms relatively
short as compared with the legs; the lower leg, as compared with the upper leg, shorter than in any of the existing
races of men; the knee habitually bent forward without the power of straightening the joint or of standing fully
erect; the hands extremely large and without the delicate play between the thumb and fingers characteristic of
modern races; the resort to a squatting position while occupied in flint-making and other industries. Thus the
ordinary attitudes characteristic of Homo neanderthalensis would be quite different from our own and most
ungainly. The heavy head, the enormous development of the face, and the backward position of the foramen
magnum, through which the spinal cord connects with the brain, would tend to throw the upper part of the body
forward, and this tendency, with the lesser curvature of the neck, the heavy shoulders, and the flattened form of the
head, would give this portion of the body a more or less anthropoid aspect.

Geographic Distribution of Mousterian Stations
The Neanderthal race of Mousterian times established stations all over western Europe, of which upward of fifty
have already been discovered, as compared with the fifty-seven or more Acheulean stations known. At some points
the old open camps of the Acheulean flint workers were still visited, as along the Thames, the Somme, and the
Marne. Thus Abbeville, St. Acheul, Montières, and Chelles, in northern France, show a succession of Mousterian
industry following the Acheulean, the Chellean, and, at St. Acheul, even the Pre-Chellean. These may well have
been summer stations, visited at favorable seasons of the year because of their abundant supply of flint. About 125
miles to the east of St. Acheul, in Belgium, on a small tributary of the Meuse, is the grotto of Spy, which, together
with Mousterian implements, has yielded two human fossil skeletons of the Neanderthal race.
In southern Devonshire is the famous cavern of Kent's Hole, near Torquay, discovered as long ago as 1825 by
MacEnery and described in 1840 by Godwin-Austen.(68) It is interesting to note that teeth of the sabre-tooth tiger
(Machærodus latidens) have been found in this cavern, leading Boyd Dawkins to believe that this animal survived
to late geologic times: it will be recalled as a contemporary of the early Chellean flint workers at Abbeville. The
animal life of Kent's Hole, as originally described by Godwin-Austen, included remains of "elephant, rhinoceros,
ox, deer, horse, bear, hyæna, and a feline animal of large size"—fauna now known to belong to the period of the
fourth glaciation.[AI]

Page 311

Larger Image

Fig. 125. Geographic distribution of the
principal Mousterian industrial stations
in western Europe, attributed to the
Neanderthal race.

To the south are three stations, one of which, La Cotte de St. Brelade, on the present isle of Jersey, then part of the
mainland, has yielded Mousterian flakes and thirteen human teeth of Neanderthal type.
Still farther to the south, in the Dordogne region, is found the type station described on a previous page, of Le
Moustier, the centre of a group of eight sites crowded along the north and south shores of the Vézère, which have
become famous for the knowledge they yield of the successive stages in the development of the Mousterian
implements, beginning with the primitive culture station of La Micoque, and including La Ferrassie, Le Moustier,
La Rochette, Pataud, La Mouthe, Laussel, and finally the Abri Audit, which marks the closing stage in the
development of the Mousterian industry and, in the opinion of many archæologists, its transition to the
Aurignacian. At several of these places important discoveries have been made, both of human fossils and of
noteworthy transitions in the progress of invention. Circling round this Vézère group are the stations of Petit-
Puymoyen, La Quina, where implements of the closing stage of Mousterian industry have been found as well as a
human fossil of the Neanderthal type, and La Chapelle-aux-Saints, which has yielded the only complete skeleton
of a Neanderthal man so far discovered.

Page 312

Fig. 126. The Mousterian cave of Hornos de
la Peña, in the Cantabrian Mountains of
northern Spain. Photograph by N. C.
Nelson.

In Spain is the station of San Isidro, near the headwaters of the Tagus, and the beautifully situated grottos of
Castillo and Hornos de la Peña, on the northern slopes of the Cantabrian Mountains.
As contrasted with the very numerous Acheulean sites of Italy, it is surprising to note that only two Mousterian
grottos have thus far been discovered in this region: the Grotte delle Fate in the mountains of Liguria, and the very
important group of caves on the Riviera, near Mentone, known as the Grottes de Grimaldi, close to the seashore
and at the very point where the Italian Alps abut upon the sea. Crossing to the north, we note the superb Swiss
grotto of Wildkirchli, on the headwaters of the Rhine, 5,000 feet above sea-level.

Page 313

Fig. 127. Outlook from the cave of Hornos de
la Peña. Photograph by N. C. Nelson.

In all Germany there are only about seven stations of unquestioned Mousterian age. Of these six are grottos, and
the seventh, Mommenheim, is a fluvial redeposit of loess along a small stream, where only one implement has
been found.(69) It is interesting to observe that in Germany these Mousterian sites occupy the great wedge of
territory between the Scandinavian ice-fields on the north, and the Alpine on the south, and that Wildkirchli was
actually within the area of glaciation; while the caves of Räuberhöhle and Šipka were not far from the glaciers
which clothed the Carpathian Mountains, and Baumannshöhle was not so very remote from the great Scandinavian
ice-field. In the region of the headwaters of the Rhine and Danube the industry of the Neanderthal race has thus far
been traced only at the stations of Irpfelhöhle, Räuberhöhle, and Sirgenstein. The latter cavern is of especial
importance because it comprises the entire Palæolithic history of this region, presenting a series of successive
culture layers from Mousterian times up to the arrival of the Neolithic race. Further to the east are the
Gudenushöhle, near Krems, in Lower Austria, and Ochos and Šipka, in Moravia, while over the Russian border are
Wierschovie and Miskolcz. Well to the northwest of Wildkirchli are the stations of Mommenheim and Kartstein,
and to the north that of Baumannshöhle.

Workmanship of the Neanderthals
The dense communal life of Mousterian times may have favored a social evolution, the development of the
imagination and of tribal lore, and the beginnings of the religious belief and ceremonial of which apparent
indications are found to be wide-spread among the entirely different races of Upper Palæolithic times. The life is
not, however, marked by industrial progress or invention.
The successive stages of the Mousterian industry have not as yet been so clearly defined as those of the Acheulean
(Schmidt(70)). In the open Mousterian stations and caverns of Belgium and England Schmidt has observed the
stages of early, middle, and late Mousterian. Breuil and Obermaier consider La Micoque as belonging to the close
of the Acheulean but as marking the transition into the Mousterian. Breuil considers the industry of the Combe-
Capelle station as representing the oldest true Mousterian culture. The researches which have been carried thus far
would appear to justify the following subdivisions of the Mousterian culture in southwestern France:
6. Abri Audit culture, marking the transition from late Mousterian to early Aurignacian industry.
5. Late true Mousterian industry. La Quina type of implements with scrapers and bone anvils.
4. Middle Mousterian industry, with a predominance of handsome, large Mousterian points
carefully 'retouched' on the edge and sometimes on one side, a 'retouch' at times approaching
the superior Solutrean technique.
3. Primitive early Mousterian industry, with a limited inventory of implements.
2. Combe-Capelle stage, with heart-shaped coups de poing and typical Mousterian 'points.'
(Arrival of reindeer.)
1. La Micoque culture, transitional from Acheulean to Mousterian times. (No reindeer.)
The flint industry, although very different in its outward appearance, is recognizable as a direct evolution from the
Acheulean, with the suppression or decline of certain implements and the improvements of others. It is the product
of the same kind of mind at work with the same materials, but under different climatic conditions and with new
demands, especially for clothing as protection against the severe weather. We also cannot avoid the feeling that the
abandonment of the free, open life of Chellean and early Acheulean times and the crowding of the Neanderthal
tribesmen beneath the shelters and in the grottos had a dwarfing effect both upon the physique and upon the
industry itself. The Mousterian implements, as compared with the Acheulean, impress one as the work of a less
muscular and vigorous race.
In addition to the many fine transitions that one observes(71) between the Acheulean and Mousterian industries at
St. Acheul, strong evidence is also furnished in favor of a close connection between these cultures by the

Page 314

discoveries at Laussel, on the Vézère, near Les Eyzies. There, broad and deep before this shelter of Laussel, lies
the Mousterian layer, and directly beneath it is a true Acheulean layer close to the waters of the valley of the
Beune. This proves that in Acheulean times this valley was deepened to the same degree as to-day, and a close
union of the Acheulean to the Mousterian is here again evident. In the valley of the Somme near St. Acheul
Commont has also observed proofs of a similar close connection between these cultures. With such records in
northern and southern France, the Neanderthal race, which is known toward the end of Acheulean times and
especially covers the entire period of Mousterian time, comes much nearer to us. If we assign the Mousterian
industry to the last glacial period, we give it a duration of some 30,000 years, and this is about the reckoning which
thoughtful anatomists have already assigned for the Neanderthal man.

Special Mousterian Implements
Two instruments are especially typical of the Mousterian industry from beginning to end; these are the 'pointe' and
the 'racloir.' The former, pointed and spear-shaped, is from 1 to 4 inches in length; the latter is a broad scraper,
from 1 to 2 inches in width; and both have the distinctive peculiarity of being composed of a large flake of flint
struck off from a larger bulb or nodule and of being retouched only on one side, leaving on the opposite side the
smooth conchoidal surface of the flake.(72) This point and scraper are highly characteristic not only of the early
stages but of the Mousterian industry throughout its entire course, including even the late La Quina types, and their
manner of making is obviously a modified usage of the late Acheulean discovery of the flakes of Levallois.

Fig. 128. Typical Mousterian 'points' from the
type station of Le Moustier, made of a
large flake of flint struck off from the
nodule and retouched on only one side,
leaving on the opposite side a smooth,
conchoidal surface. After Déchelette, by
permission of M. A. Picard, Librairie
Alphonse Picard et Fils.

A matter of the greatest interest in the industrial development of western Europe at this time is the fact that this
discovery of the utilization of the flake, whether in the 'lames de Levallois' or in the Mousterian point and scraper,
led to the decline of the coup de poing. The retouched flakes of various shapes were easier to make and to repair
and served equally well the purposes of skinning and dismembering game which had been previously served by
the ancient coup de poing.(73)

Page 315

Larger Image

Fig. 129. Mousterian 'points' and scrapers
from various parts of Europe, as
interpreted by de Mortillet. In some
cases both sides of the implement are
shown; all are one-quarter actual size
except 101, which is one-half actual
size. 100—De Mortillet's theory of the
manner of using the Mousterian 'point,'
which was held in the hand and not
shafted. 101—Mousterian point from
Suffolk, England. 102—Mousterian
point from Umbria, Italy. 103, 104—A
single flake point from the Crimea, in
southern Russia. 105, 106—A long,
narrow Mousterian point from Oise,
France. 107—A curved-in scraper, or
grattoir, from Dordogne, France;
perhaps an implement for dressing a
wooden spear or lance. 108—Bone
splinter, broken for the marrow, but not
shaped.

In consequence, the coup de poing, fashioned from the core of the nodule, begins to play a very secondary rôle and
occurs but rarely in the Mousterian levels. Even at St. Acheul, the very centre of its former reign, we begin to find
decadent forms and poor workmanship, which make it difficult to recognize that these are the successors of the
finely retouched Acheulean coups de poing. While the coups de poing at the type station of Le Moustier continue
to retain the old Acheulean patterns—the oval, the heart-shaped, the sharp-pointed—they are all of smaller size
and rather coarsely retouched. Thus, after thousands of years of development and employment, the coup de poing
falls into a period of degeneration and of final disuse. The history of this. implement, which we have traced from
its Pre-Chellean prototypes, presents a most interesting analogy with the course of evolution observed in so many
animal and plant forms. It passes through many stages of improvement and reaches a climax of perfection and

Page 316

adaptation; it then comes into competition with another form evolving on a fundamentally different and superior
plan and disappears in the struggle for existence through the greater usefulness of the replacing type.

Successive Stages in the Mousterian Industry
The succession of industrial stages is best shown along the Vézère. The oldest Mousterian industry is that of
Combe-Capelle with its heart-shaped, roughly fashioned coups de poing, entirely lacking, however, any evidence
of a surface prepared for the grasp of the hand.
In the valley of the Somme Commont(74) has observed the three following stages in the advance of the Mousterian
industry:
3. A late Mousterian culture which lies on the upper layers near the top of the same gravel deposit
and which shows entirely new technical elements. The old coup-de-poing culture is no
longer valued, and all the implements found here are of flakes worked only on one side and
with an extraordinarily fine retouch.
2. A middle Mousterian horizon which lies in the lower layers of a gravel deposit, belonging to
the 'newer loess,' and which contains only one small coup de poing.
1. An early Mousterian, with quite numerous lance-shaped coups de poing, lies at the base of the
'newer loess,' showing that the coup-de-poing tradition still lingers and the coup-de-poing
type is still preserved. With these are associated the new types of implements and especially
the 'hand-points,' which are so typical of the Mousterian industry.
The more recent levels (2, 3) contain longer flakes, which already exhibit a tendency toward the
blades, or 'lames,' of the Upper Palæolithic.
In the shelters and caverns of Dordogne the same industrial sequence may be observed, although the chronological
succession of the strata is not always clearly defined. At the grotto of Combe-Capelle the heart-shaped coups de
poing retain most strongly the old traditions, but even here these are outnumbered by the well-fashioned
Mousterian 'points,' chipped only on one side.
The further development of the Mousterian industry may be observed in the type station of Le Moustier, where the
lower levels show a primitive Mousterian consisting mostly of very fine, irregularly fashioned flakes, made into
small scrapers, triangular points, borers, and disks. The overlying layer includes very carefully worked Mousterian
points which are frequently retouched on one side over the entire surface; here the Mousterian technique reaches
its highest development, so that Schmidt designates it as 'high Mousterian.'(75) Above this layer, again, is a level of
typical late Mousterian forms, quite unlike the small primitive flakes of the lower level and resembling the
characteristic forms of La Quina, the dominant type being the finely shaped La Quina racloir. The few diminutive
coups de poing which occur in this level at Le Moustier furnish the only distinction between the industry here and
that of La Quina, where no coups de poing are found. At Le Moustier also occur the typical bone anvils which
were first recognized at La Quina.
The Mousterian industry of the Neanderthals was thus devoted mainly to the development of the smaller forms of
implements, for the most part retouched on one side only, and with a constant improvement of technique. Yet the
chief types of Mousterian implements remain the same as in Acheulean times, as shown in the accompanying
table.
The implement known as the pointe, or the 'hand-point,' is a principal and very characteristic Mousterian form
further perfected from its Acheulean stage. It is spear-headed in shape and chipped on one side only, and continues
into late Mousterian times, being still found in the Mousterian levels of Spy, in Belgium.
The pointe double, a double-pointed, spear-shaped form, at times almost attains the elongate shape of the Solutrean
pointe de laurier, though never its slenderness, symmetry, and perfection of technique.
Industrial.
Coup de poing (decadent), hand-stone.
ovoid.

Page 317

heart-shaped.
sharp-pointed.
Hachette, chopper.
Grattoir, planing tool.
Perçoir, drill, borer.
Couteau, knife.
Racloir, scraper.
knife-edged.
curved-out edge.
saw-edged.
double-edged.
beak-shaped.
many-edged.
Pointe, 'hand-point.'
Percuteur? hammer-stone?

War and Chase.
Pointe, 'hand-point.'
Pointe double, spear head?
Coup de poing, hand-stone.
Pierre de jet, throwing stone.
Couteau, knife.
There are five or six well-defined varieties of the racloir, or scraper, carefully fashioned out of flakes. The principal
form is crescentic in shape, with outward-curved edge. Other forms are saw-like with straight edges or knife-
edged. Another form with very neatly and symmetrically incurved borders has its edges sharply retouched, as if for
the smoothing down of bone or wooden shafts. The borer is also fashioned of an elongate flake and sometimes
finished with a very fine point at one of its extremities. It is noteworthy that the grattoir, or planing tool, so well
developed in the Upper Palæolithic industries, appears only sporadically in Mousterian times. For example, at La
Quina, in the closing stages of the Mousterian industry, out of 220 implements collected at hazard, there were 166
scrapers of six different forms, 45 'hand-points' of five different forms, and 5 double points, as compared with 5
grattoirs, or planing tools. There are very few knife-shaped forms. It would appear that the racloir and the perçoir
were the principal implements employed in the preparation of skins for clothing.
In early Mousterian times the coup de poing may still have been used by the Neanderthals in the chase, and the
fine, spear-headed 'point' and the rarer 'double point' may have been developed in response to the needs of hunters,
who now ventured the chase of the bison, the urus, the wild horse, and the reindeer.
The most striking features of all the implements which may have been used in the chase are: first, the absence of
any definite proof of their attachment to a shaft or handle; and second, the absence of any barbed or headed type of
point. The use of the barb, as we shall see, appears to be a relatively recent discovery of the later cultures of Upper
Palæolithic times.

Page 318

Larger Image

Fig. 130. Late Mousterian implements, after
de Mortillet, one-quarter actual size.
109, 110—Point, finely retouched at one
end, from Seine-et-Marne, France. The
reverse shows a retouch on the flaked
surface which suggests the double-face
Solutrean retouch. 111, 112—A very
large racloir, or scraper, from La Quina,
Charente, France; part of the bulb of
percussion has been chipped off. 113—
Double-ended point from Le Moustier,
retouched on both surfaces. 114, 115—
Combination point and scraper from Le
Moustier, Dordogne, France. 116—
Double scraper, or racloir, with grattoir,
or planing end.

The transition from the Mousterian to the Aurignacian appears in the Abri Audit, which also lies in the valley of
the Vézère. Here we still find irregularly fashioned coups de poing, decadent followers of the heart-shaped types of
the earliest Mousterian industry; this is nearly the last phase in the decline of the old coup-de-poing manufacture.
While the lance-shaped coup de poing of the late Acheulean never appears in any true Mousterian industry, the
shorter, more heart-shaped type of Combe-Capelle traverses the entire Mousterian and, after further stages of
degeneration, passes into the Abri Audit culture and even lingers into the early Aurignacian. At this latter station
the typical Mousterian 'points' are almost wanting.
The Mousterian, observes Schmidt,(75) which preserves the traditions of the Lower Palæolithic coup-de-poing
culture, is one of the most interesting phases in the development of Palæolithic industry, in that its successive
stages exhibit the very last phases of the great coup-de-poing industry, of which only the almond and oval scraper
types appear, and that very rarely, in the early Aurignacian. On the other hand, in the late Mousterian we observe a
trend toward the blade (lame) industry of the Upper Palæolithic. Careful study and observation of the subdivisions
of Mousterian culture have thus far been limited to central and southern France, and they have not yet been traced

Page 319

in Spain; but in the grottos of Belgium and England the early, middle, and late Mousterian types are known to
exist.
Bone anvils, fashioned out of the hard surfaces of the foreleg and foot bones of the bison and horse, were
discovered at La Quina in 1906. They show a flattened surface with cross incisions too regular to be accidental and
too far from the articulation to be the result of an inexpert attempt to sever the joint.(76) This was not the only use
of bone in Mousterian times, however, for primitive pointed implements of bone are occasionally found in
Dordogne, mingled with Mousterian flints. A variety of rudely fashioned bone implements also occurs at
Wildkirchli, in Switzerland.

Disappearance of the Neanderthal Race
We have seen that the Neanderthals dwelt in Europe for a very long time, many thousands of years, during which
they doubtless underwent considerable evolution from lower to higher types, and into varieties, under the
modifying influences of climate, food, and racial habits. Consequently the known remains of Neanderthals exhibit
a decided variation in head form, as well as in dentition: some are more primitive and ape-like; others, such as Spy
II, are more like the modern races. The Krapina variety is more broad-headed than the typical Neanderthal variety.
The Gibraltar variety is in many respects of low type. The individual known as Spy II is of higher type than the
other Neanderthals. The variations in stature so far as known are slight.
For these and other reasons Hrdlička,(77) who has recently made a broad comparative study of the chief
Neanderthal remains of Europe, is of the opinion that the Neanderthals partly evolved into the lower races of
Homo sapiens; being not only in some measure ancestral to such very primitive forms as the Brünn or Předmost
race of Upper Palæolithic times, but even contributing to the higher race of the Crô-Magnons. He also holds that
traces of Neanderthal blood and physiognomy are not lacking even among modern Europeans.
A contrary view is set forth in the present volume; namely, that the Neanderthals represent a side branch of the
human race which became wholly extinct in western Europe. This view the author shares with Boule and with
Schwalbe. Certainly the evidence afforded by the known Upper Palæolithic burial sites does not support the theory
that the Neanderthals persisted. It is possible, however, that the Upper Palæolithic skeletons discovered at
Předmost, and now awaiting description by Maška, may modify this conclusion and demonstrate Hrdlička's theory
that the Neanderthals survived and left descendants or men of mixed Neanderthal and Homo sapiens race along the
valley of the Danube.
Whatever may have been their fate in other regions, certainly the most sudden racial change which we know of in
the whole prehistory of western Europe is the disappearance of the Neanderthal race at the close of the Mousterian
culture stage, which was the latest industrial period of Lower Palæolithic times, and their replacement by the Crô-
Magnon race. From geologic evidence the date of this replacement is believed to have been between 20,000 and
25,000 years before our era. So far as we know at present, the Neanderthals were entirely eliminated; no trace of
the survival of the pure Neanderthal type has been found in any of the Upper Palæolithic burial sites; nor have the
alleged instances of the survival of the Neanderthal strain or of people bearing the Neanderthal cranial characters
been substantiated. We incline to agree with Boule and Schwalbe that the supposed cases among modern races of
the transmission of Neanderthal characters are simply low or reversional types, which, upon close analysis, are
never found to present the highly distinctive and peculiar combination of Neanderthal characteristics.
There is some reason to believe that the Neanderthals were degenerating physically and industrially during the
very severe conditions of life of the fourth glaciation, but the consequent inferiority and diminution in numbers
would not account for their total extinction, and we are inclined to attribute this to the entrance into the whole
Neanderthal country of western Europe toward the close of Lower Palæolithic times of a new and highly superior
race. Archæologists find traces of a new culture and industry in certain Mousterian stations preceding the
disappearance of the typical Mousterian industry. Such a mingling is found in the valley of the Somme in northern
France.
From this scanty evidence we may infer that the new race competed for a time with the Neanderthals before they
dispossessed them of their principal stations and drove them out of the country or killed them in battle. The
Neanderthals, no doubt, fought with wooden weapons and with the stone-headed dart and spear, but there is no
evidence that they possessed the bow and arrow. There is, on the contrary, some possibility that the newly arriving

Page 320

Crô-Magnon race may have been familiar with the bow and arrow, for a barbed arrow or spear head appears in
drawings of a later stage of Crô-Magnon history, the so-called Magdalenian. It is thus possible, though very far
from being demonstrated, that when the Crô-Magnons entered western Europe, at the dawn of the Upper
Palæolithic, they were armed with weapons which, with their superior intelligence and physique, would have given
them a very great advantage in contests with the Neanderthals.

(1) Commont, 1912.1, p. 294.
(2) Smith, W., 1894.1, chap. XV.
(3) Dietrich, 1910.1, pp. 329, 330.
(4) Penck, 1909.1.
(5) Leverett, 1910.1, pp. 306-314.
(6) Geikie, 1914.1.
(7) Op. cit., p. 272.
(8) Op. cit., pp. 265-266.
(9) Keith, 1911.1, p. 23, Fig. 5.
(10) Munro, 1912.1, pp. 46, 47.
(11) Lartet, 1861.1; 1875.1.
(12) De Vibraye, 1864.1.
(13) Massénat, 1868.1.
(14) Smith, W., 1894.1, chap. XIV.
(15) Geikie, 1914.1, p. 119.
(16) Smith, W., op. cit., pp. 196, 197.
(17) Op. cit., p. 224.
(18) Geikie, 1914.1, p. 118.
(19) Bächler, 1912.1.
(20) Schmidt, 1912.1, pp. 18-32, 165-171.
(21) Op. cit., Table opposite p. 270.
(22) Osborn, 1910.1, pp. 419, 420.
(23) Niezabitowski, 1911.1.
(24) Harlé, 1908.1, p. 302.
(25) Obermaier, 1912.1, p. 135.
(26) Keith, 1911.2.
(27) Boule, 1913.1, pp. 220, 221.
(28) Op. cit., p. 64.
(29) Fischer, 1913.1, pp. 336, 337.

Page 321

(30) Schaaffhausen, 1875.1; 1858.1.
(31) Lyell, 1863.1, pp. 80-92.
(32) Schwalbe, 1897.1; 1901.1; 1901.2; 1904.1.
(33) King, 1864.1.
(34) Cope, 1893.1.
(35) Wilser, 1898.1.
(36) Fraipont, 1887.1.
(37) Schwalbe, 1914.2.
(38) Dupont, 1866.1.
(39) Maška, 1886.1.
(40) Rzehak, 1906.1.
(41) Fischer, 1913.1.
(42) Klaatsch, 1909.1.
(43) Bouyssonie, 1909.1.
(44) Boule, 1908.1; 1908.2; 1909.1; 1911.1; 1912.1.
(45) Boule, 1913.1.
(46) Martin, H., 1911.1.
(47) Nicolle, 1910.1.
(48) Keith, 1911.1.
(49) Fischer, 1913.1, p. 352.
(50) Schwalbe, 1914.1, p. 544, Figs. 4 and 5.
(51) Fischer, op. cit.
(52) Boule, 1913.1, p. 85.
(53) Gorjanovič-Kramberger, 1909.1.
(54) Boule, 1913.1, p. 104.
(55) Tomes, 1914.1, pp. 588-598.
(56) Schwalbe, 1901.2; 1914.1, pp. 534, 535.
(57) Schwalbe, 1901.1.
(58) Boule, 1913.1.
(59) Op. cit., pp. 66, 67, 72, 75.
(60) Berry, 1914.1.
(61) Johnson, 1913.1.
(62) Quatrefages, 1884.1, p. 394.
(63) Martin, R., 1914.1, p. 645.

Page 322

(64) Boule, 1910.1; 1911.1.
(65) Anthony, 1912.1.
(66) Boule, 1913.1, p. 119.
(67) Op. cit., p. 120.
(68) Geikie, 1914.1, p. 130; Godwin-Austen, 1840.1.
(69) Schmidt, 1912.1, pp. 23, 32, 66, 75, 76, 101, 169.
(70) Op. cit., p. 128.
(71) Schuchhardt, 1913.1, p. 144.
(72) Déchelette, 1908.1, vol. I, pp. 98-101.
(73) Obermaier, 1912.1, p. 130.
(74) Commont, 1909.1.
(75) Schmidt, 1912.1, pp. 126-128.
(76) Déchelette, 1908.1, vol. I, pp. 104, 105.
(77) Hrdlička, 1914.1.

Page 323

CHAPTER IV
OPENING OF THE UPPER PALÆOLITHIC—THE GRIMALDI
RACE—ARRIVAL OF THE CRÔ-MAGNON RACE AND OF
THE AURIGNACIAN INDUSTRY—GEOGRAPHIC AND
CLIMATIC CONDITIONS—MAMMALIAN LIFE—
CHARACTERISTICS AND HABITS OF THE CRÔ-
MAGNONS—DISTRIBUTION OF THE AURIGNACIAN
INDUSTRY—THE BIRTH OF ART—ORIGIN AND
DISTRIBUTION OF THE SOLUTREAN INDUSTRY—
BRÜNN RACE—SOLUTREAN INDUSTRY AND ART.
In the whole racial history of western Europe there has never occurred so profound a change as that involving the
disappearance of the Neanderthal race and the appearance of the Crô-Magnon race. It was the replacement of a
race lower than any existing human type by one which ranks high among the existing types in capacity and
intelligence. The Crô-Magnons belonged to Homo sapiens, the same species of man as ourselves, and appear to
have been the chief race of the Upper Palæolithic Period up to the very close of Magdalenian times, after which
they apparently underwent a decline.
Although there were one or more other races which influenced the industrial development of western Europe, the
Crô-Magnons were certainly dominant, as shown both by the abundance of their skeletal remains and by the wide
distribution of their industry and art; the Upper Palæolithic may almost be said to be the period of the Crô-
Magnons as the Lower Palæolithic is that of the Neanderthals and the Pre-Neanderthals. Their arrival toward the
end of Mousterian times effected a social and industrial change and a race replacement of so profound a nature that
it would certainly be legitimate to separate the Upper Palæolithic from the Lower by a break equal to that which
separates the former from the Neolithic.(1)
The arrival of the Crô-Magnons and the introduction of the Aurignacian industry are the first events of the
prehistory of Europe to which we can assign a date with any degree of confidence; they correspond geologically
with the close of the fourth glaciation and the beginning of Postglacial time, the duration of which has been
estimated by geologists from evidence of many different kinds, but which brings us, nevertheless, to substantially
similar conclusions. It seems that 25,000 years is a conservative estimate for the duration of the Postglacial Period;
this is supported by the independent observations of Lyell, Taylor, Penck and Brückner, and Coleman; it is within
the estimates made by Chamberlin and Salisbury, Fairchild, Sardeson, and Spencer; it is somewhat larger than the
estimates of Gilbert and Upham.[AJ] Thus, with considerable confidence we may record man of the modern type of
Homo sapiens as entering western Europe between 25,000 and 30,000 years ago.
The Lower Palæolithic industrial cycle, comprising the Chellean, Acheulean, and Mousterian, seems to have been
similar in evolution both around the Mediterranean coasts and in the northern portions of Europe. From the fact
that the Crô-Magnons arrived with the Aurignacian industry it would appear that they came through Phœnicia and
along the southern coasts of the Mediterranean, through Tunis, into Spain; also perhaps along the northern coasts
of the Mediterranean through Italy. Their evolution had probably taken place somewhere on the continent of Asia,
for their physical structure is entirely of Asiatic type, and not in the least of African or Ethiopian type; that is, they
exhibit no negroid characters whatever. The reason that Breuil considers that the Aurignacian did not come in
through central or eastern Europe is that there are no early Aurignacian stations in either region, whereas the
Aurignacian is abundantly developed along the Mediterranean coasts, both of Europe and Africa. The passage of
the Crô-Magnons along these coasts was, therefore, like the subsequent wave of the true Mediterranean race, dark-
haired, long-headed, narrow-faced people, which followed this coast in early Neolithic times, or, again, like the
wave of the Arabian or Moslem advance, which pressed forward along the northern coast of Africa and into
southwestern Europe.

Page 324

Fig. 131. Entrance to the great Grotte du
Prince at the base of the limestone
promontory known as the Baoussé
Roussé, with a view of Mentone in the
distance. After Davanne.

Some support of this theory of migration along the north coast of Africa is given by the presence of the skeletons
of two members of an entirely distinct race, which are commonly known as the 'negroids of Grimaldi' because of
their discovery in the Grottes de Grimaldi near Mentone, and because they alone among all the Upper Palæolithic
races thus far discovered in Europe display a number of resemblances to the African negroid race. Anatomically
they are related neither to the Neanderthals nor to the Crô-Magnons. Their archæologic age appears to be early
Aurignacian because they are found immediately above the layer which marks the close of Mousterian time and
the last climate favorable to the warm fauna of mammals.
This sunny coast where modern France joins Italy has supplied some of the most valuable records of the racial and
industrial transition from the Lower to the Upper Palæolithic. Of the nine Grottes de Grimaldi three at least show
evidences of occupation in closing Mousterian times, probably by men of the Neanderthal race, although no
skeletal remains of Neanderthals have been found here. Four of the grottos, namely, the Grotte des Enfants, the
Grotte de Cavillon, the Barma Grande, and the Baousso da Torre, have yielded altogether the skeletal remains of
sixteen individuals, all associated with implements of Aurignacian culture and evidently representing a number of
ceremonial burials. Fourteen of these skeletons are attributed by Verneau to the Crô-Magnon race; the other two
are the 'negroids of Grimaldi' above referred to. This is, therefore, a prehistoric record of the greatest significance,
which we shall now examine more in detail.

Racial Succession along the Ancient Riviera
Where the southern spurs of the Alps descend into the Mediterranean and separate France from Italy we find a
limestone promontory, known as the Baoussé Roussé, projecting in a long cliff, beneath which the rocky shore
descends abruptly into the sea. Opening toward the south, and at intervals along the base of this cliff are the nine
Grottes de Grimaldi. Doubtless the Neanderthals migrated along these shores at a time when the hippopotamus,
the straight-tusked elephant (E. antiquus), and Merck's rhinoceros (R. merckii) still abounded as the last
representatives of the great African-Asiatic fauna. These hunters of Mousterian times entered the sea-swept floor
of the great Grotte du Prince[AK] (Fig. 131), with a ceiling height at that time perhaps of over 80 feet, carrying in
their game to the fire-hearths, and leaving Mousterian implements in the accumulating deposits. In the succeeding

Page 325

layers of this grotto the changing forms of animal life demonstrate the effect of the fourth glaciation and the
cooling of the climate toward the close of Mousterian times.
The smaller Grotte des Enfants (Fig. 132), which lies to the west of the Prince's Grotto, was apparently occupied at
a somewhat more recent period, because the lowest fire-hearths contain, together with the Mousterian implements,
remains of Merck's rhinoceros only—apparently the last survivor here, as well as in other parts of western Europe,
of the warm African-Asiatic fauna. The hippopotamus and the straight-tusked elephant had either become extinct
or had been driven farther south by the time the hunters first occupied this grotto. In the overlying layers of this
and several other grottos the fire-hearths contain remains of a rich forest fauna which includes the wild boar, stag,
roe-deer, wild horse, wolf, and bear. The first signs of increasing cold in the mountains to the north is the
appearance of remains of the chamois and ibex driven from the Alpine heights. Then in still higher layers appears
the reindeer, harbinger of the tundra climate.

The Grimaldi Race
Verneau is inclined to regard the Grimaldi as a very ancient race, antedating the Crô-Magnon.(2) He believes that
they belong to a new ethnic type which played an important rôle in Europe and enjoyed a wide geographic
distribution. There does not, however, seem to be much support for this opinion, because, unlike some other races,
no traces of the Grimaldis have been found elsewhere, and it would appear more probable that they were, as their
skeletal characters indicate, true negroids which perhaps found their way from Africa but never became established
as a race in western Europe.
The type consists of two skeletons found in the Grotte des Enfants by Verneau in 1906. One skeleton is that of a
middle-aged woman; the other is that of a youth of sixteen or seventeen. Both are referred to the existing species of
man, Homo sapiens. The layer which contained them is on a level two feet lower than any which contained Crô-
Magnons, and immediately above the culture layer of Mousterian times.

Fig. 132. Section of the Grotte des Enfants,
after Tschirret. In deposits which
accumulated to a thickness of over 30
feet this grotto contains in its ascending
strata a complete epitome of the
vicissitudes of climate, together with
four burials of members of the Crô-

Page 326

Magnon Race, and, near the base, the
burial of the two Grimaldi skeletons.
The layers in descending order are as
follows:
A. Burial of two infant skeletons. Remains of
forest and alpine (Ibex) mammals.
B. Burial of the skeleton of a Crô-Magnon
woman. Remains of forest and alpine
mammals.
C. Fire-hearths containing forest mammals—
the wild boar, also the reindeer.
D. Fire-hearths with flints of Aurignacian
type. Remains of forest fauna—the
marten.
E. Layer containing a cairn or artificial pile of
stone. Remains of ibex, horse, wolf,
cave-lion, and fox.
Intermediate layer. Remains of the wild ass,
perhaps of the steppe type, and of the
reindeer; also of the ibex, the wild horse,
and forest fauna—the wild boar.
F. Large fragments fallen from the cave roof.
No evidence of habitation.
G. Fire-hearths. Remains of the moose, roe-
deer, fallow deer, stag, wild cattle, ibex,
fox, leopard, and rabbit.
H. Burial of a very tall skeleton of the Crô-
Magnon Race (see Fig. 144, p. 297).
Fire-hearths containing remains of the
forest fauna, also the alpine chamois and
marmot, the cave-hyæna, and the
leopard.
I. Burial of two skeletons of the Grimaldi
Race (see Fig. 133, p. 267). Flints of
Aurignacian type and remains of a forest
fauna which includes the deer, also of
the wild horse, the alpine ibex, and the
hyæna.
K. Traces of charcoal and disturbed fire-
hearths.
K-L. Remains of Merck's rhinoceros and of
the hyæna. Alpine (Ibex) and temperate
forest fauna.
L. Traces of fire-hearths with Mousterian
implements, chiefly of quartzite,
probably left by members of the
Neanderthal Race on the ancient floor

Page 327

of the grotto, following the recession of
the sea. Evidence of previous occupation
by hyænas.
The Grimaldi characters present a wide contrast to those of the Crô-Magnon. The two known skeletons, of a
woman and a youth, are of inferior stature, not exceeding 5 feet 3 inches:

Grimaldi female estimated at 1.57 m. 5 ft. 2 in.
" youth " " 1.55 m. 5 ft. 1 in.

These measurements, however, are only slightly inferior to those of the Crô-Magnon woman and youth, which rise
to 5 feet 5 inches. There are many negroid characters in the skull, in the structure of the hip-girdle, and in the
proportions of the limbs; there are also some characters in common with the anthropoid apes, namely, the long
forearm, the curved thigh-bone, and the marked prognathism, or projection of the tooth row; the face is low and
broad, and extremely prognathous; the nose is platyrhine, or broad and flat; the jaw is heavy, with large teeth and
without the chin prominence; the head form, like that of the Crô-Magnons, is dolichocephalic and somewhat
disharmonic; that is, while the head is long, the face is short and relatively broad. Yet the cranial capacity is
relatively high, being estimated at 1,580 c.cm. Unlike the Crô-Magnons, the Grimaldis have a relatively long
forearm and a negroid type of pelvis. The proportions of the leg are, however, somewhat similar to those of the leg
of the Crô-Magnon, the thigh-bone being short and the shin-bone long, the index being 83.8 per cent. In addition to
the long forearm, which approaches in form that of the living anthropoid apes, there is a curved femur, distinctly of
anthropoid-ape character.
"In its body and tooth characters," observes Verneau,(3) "this negroid race in many respects shows a greater
resemblance to the anthropoid apes than does the Neanderthal race." He continues: "The fact remains that at a very
remote period of the Pleistocene there existed in Europe, beside the Neanderthal race, a type of man that in many
of his cephalic characters, in the structure of his pelvis, and in his limb proportions showed striking analogies to
the negro of to-day. In their remarkable proportions they exaggerate some of the peculiarities of the recent negroes;
the teeth resemble those of the Australian types. There is evidence of the establishment and spread of the Grimaldi
race throughout western Europe, namely, in cases of partial reversion to this type among the skeletal remains of the
Neolithic Age, the Bronze Age, and the early Iron Age in Brittany, Switzerland, and northern Italy. Extreme
prognathism is the characteristic that most frequently appears, and in some instances there is the broad nose, with
the same osteological peculiarities that mark the Grimaldi type. In every instance these individuals show
dolichocephaly, nearly always combined with a short, broad face. Until the discovery of the Grimaldi type we were
at a loss to explain the existence of these individuals among a population from which they differed so radically."

Page 328

Fig. 133. The Grimaldi skeletons found in the
lower Aurignacian layer of the Grotte
des Enfants—the youth to the right and
the woman to the left. After Verneau.

Fig. 134. Skull of the Grimaldi youth in front
and in profile. After Verneau, one-
quarter life size.

Against this opinion of Verneau we should weigh the entire absence of any trace of this Grimaldi race in any part
of western Europe among all the burials and other human remains of Upper Palæolithic age known at the present
time. Setting aside any such records which are of doubtful authenticity or difficult to diagnose on account of their
fragmentary nature, there remains a number of human fossils representing at least ninety individuals discovered at
over fifteen widely distributed localities. None of these shows any features of the Grimaldi race.

Page 329

In describing the Grimaldi skeletons, Keith(4) agrees that they are of a mixed or negroid type; the shallow,
projecting incisor part of the upper jaw and the characters of the chin are features of recent negroid races; so are
the wide opening of the nose, the prominent cheek-bones, the flat and short face. Yet the bridge of the nose is not
flat as in negroes, but rather prominent as in Europeans, and the capacity of the skull in the woman (1,375 c.cm.) is
ample. In the boy the teeth are large and of the negro type; he bears a striking resemblance to the woman, and his
cranial capacity (1,580 c.cm.) indicates a distinctly modern brain; the prominences of the forehead do not meet
across the median line as in certain negroids and in the Neanderthals. Keith concludes that the Grimaldi people
represent an intermediate type in the evolution of the typical white and black races.

MAIN FEATURES OF THE ENTIRE UPPER PALÆOLITHIC HISTORY
Having now considered the opening of the Upper Palæolithic, also the single appearance of the Grimaldi race of
which no further trace is known, it is desirable to briefly review the entire Upper Palæolithic history before we
attempt to follow in detail its successive phases beginning with the appearance of the Aurignacian industry.
There is evidence of various kinds that the Crô-Magnons arrived in western Europe, bringing in their Aurignacian
industry, while the Neanderthals were still in possession of the country and practising their Mousterian industry.
Thus in the valley of the Somme, Commont believes he has recognized a level of flints, exhibiting the primitive
Aurignacian 'retouch' of Dordogne, but occurring beneath a late Mousterian level. Additional evidence of a contact
between the industries of these two races is found at the stations of La Ferrassie, of Les Bouffia, and especially of
the Abri Audit, where there is a distinct transition period, in which the characteristic types of the late Mousterian
are found intermixed with a number of flints suggesting the early Aurignacian;(5) here it would appear that the
development of the Aurignacian is partly a local evolution, and not an invasion of wholly new types of
implements. Breuil(6) suggests that these mixed layers may perhaps be explained by the supposition that we have
here degenerate or modified Mousterian tools, more or less influenced by contact with the Aurignacian industry of
the Crô-Magnon race.
THE STONE IMPLEMENTS CHARACTERISTIC OF LOWER AND UPPER PALÆOLITHIC TIMES

Lower Palæolithic Upper
The Typical Stone Implements Pre-
Chellean Acheulean Mousterian Aurignacian Solutrean M
Chellean
A.—WAR AND CHASE
*1. Microlithique? Arrow Point? .. .. .. .. .. ..
etc.
2. Pointe Point .. .. = + + =
3. Pointe à Soie Lance or .. .. .. .. = +
Knife
4. Pointe à Cran Lance-Head .. .. .. .. = ++
5. Pointe de " " .. .. .. .. ? ++
Laurier
*6. Coup de Poing Hand-Axe, .. + ++ = .. ..
Poniard, etc.
7. Pierre de Jet Throwing ? ? = = ? ?
Stone
*8. Couteau Knife = = = = = =

B.—INDUSTRIAL AND DOMESTIC
9. Lampe Lamp .. .. .. .. .. ..
10. Lissoir Polisher .. .. .. .. .. =
11. Mortier Mortar .. .. .. .. .. ..
12. Hachette Chopper .. ? = = .. ..
(Tranchette)
*13. Coup de Poing Hand-Axe, etc. .. + ++ = .. ..

Page 330

14. Grattoir Planing Tool = = = = = =
15. Racloir Scraper = = = ++ + =
16. Perçoir Drill, Borer = = = = = =
*17. Couteau Knife = = = = = =
18. Enclume Anvil Stone .. .. .. .. = ?
19. Percuteur Hammer-Stone = = ? ? = =

C.—ART, SCULPTURE, ENGRAVING
*20. Microlithique Drill, Graver, .. .. .. .. = =
and Etcher
21. Ciseau Chisel .. .. .. .. = =
22. Gravette Etching Tool .. .. .. .. + +
23. Burin Graver .. .. .. .. ++ =
(also Mortar, Hammer-Stone,
and Polisher)

* = twice mentioned (in different classifications).
+ or ++ denotes an unusual or culminating development.
Again, the burial customs of the Neanderthals were in many respects followed by the Crô-Magnons; they chose, in
fact, the same kind of burial sites, namely, at the entrances of grottos or in proximity to the shelters. Some degree
of ceremony must have marked these burials, for with the remains were interred implements of industry and
warfare together with offerings of food. The Neanderthal burials were with the body fully extended; the two
burials of the Grimaldi race were with the limbs in a flexed position and tightly bound to the body, probably with
skin garments or thongs. The Crô-Magnon burials are either with the body extended, as in the Grottes de Grimaldi,
or with the limbs flexed, as in the Aurignacian burial of Laugerie Haute.
THE BONE IMPLEMENTS APPEARING AT THE CLOSE OF THE LOWER PALÆOLITHIC AND HIGHLY
CHARACTERISTIC OF THE UPPER PALÆOLITHIC

Lower Palæolithic Upper
The Typical Bone Implements Pre-
Chellean Acheulean Mousterian Aurignacian Solutrean M
Chellean
A.—WAR, CHASE, FISHING
*1.Lames? Blades .. .. .. .. = ?
2.Poignard Dagger .. .. .. .. .. =
3.Hameçon? Fish-Hook? .. .. .. .. ? ?
4.Propulseur Spear .. .. .. .. .. ..
Thrower
5.Harpon Harpoon .. .. .. .. .. =
6.Pointe de Javelin .. .. .. .. = =
Sagaie Point
7.Pointe de Spear .. .. .. .. = =
Lance Point

B.—INDUSTRIAL AND DOMESTIC
8.Spatule Spatula .. .. .. .. .. =
9.Navette Shuttle .. .. .. .. .. ..
10.Epingle Pin .. .. .. .. .. ..
11. Aiguille Needle .. .. .. .. = +
*12.Lames Blades .. .. .. .. = ..
13.Compresseur Anvil .. .. .. = .. ..
14.Lissoir Smoother .. .. .. .. = =
15.Coin Wedge .. .. .. .. = ..

Page 331

16.Ciseau Chisel .. .. .. .. = ..
17.Poinçon Awl .. .. .. = = =

C.—CEREMONIAL, SOCIAL
18.Bâton de Ceremonial .. .. .. .. = +
Commandement Staff
19. Baguette Wand .. .. .. .. .. ..

* = twice mentioned (in different classifications).
+ or ++ denotes an unusual or culminating development.
Whether the Neanderthals were exterminated entirely or whether they were driven out of the country is not known;
the encounter was certainly between a very superior people, both physically and mentally, who possibly had the
use of the bow and arrow, and a very inferior and somewhat degenerate people that had been already reduced
physically and perhaps numerically by the severe climatic conditions of the fourth glaciation. The Neanderthals
were dispossessed of all their dwelling-places and industrial stations by this new and vigorous race, for at no less
than eighteen points the Aurignacian immediately succeeds upon the Mousterian industry and in a few instances
Crô-Magnon burials occur very near the Neanderthal burial sites.
In the racial replacements of savage as well as of historic peoples the men are often killed and the women spared
and taken into families of the warriors, but no evidence has thus far been found that even the Neanderthal women
were spared or allowed to remain in the country, because in none of the burials of Aurignacian times is there any
evidence of the crossing or admixture of the Crô-Magnons and the Neanderthals.

Page 332

Pl. VI. The head of the Crô-
Magnon type of Homo
sapiens, a race inhabiting
southwestern Europe
from Aurignacian to
Magdalenian times.
Antiquity in western
Europe estimated as at
least 25,000 years. After
the restoration modelled
by J. H. McGregor. For
the bodily proportions of
this finely developed
race compare Pl. VII.

The chief source of the change which swept over western Europe lay in the
brain power of the Crô-Magnons, as seen not only in the large size of the
brain as a whole but principally in the almost modern forehead and
forebrain. It was a race which had evolved in Asia and which was in no way
connected by any ancestral links with the Neanderthals; a race with a brain
capable of ideas, of reasoning, of imagination, and more highly endowed
with artistic sense and ability than any uncivilized race which has ever been
discovered. No trace of artistic instinct whatever has been found among the
Neanderthals; we have seen developing among them only a sense of
symmetry and proportion in the fashioning of their implements. After
prolonged study of the works of the Crô-Magnons one cannot avoid the
conclusions that their capacity was nearly if not quite as high as our own;
that they were capable of advanced education; that they had a strongly
developed æsthetic as well as a religious sense; that their society was quite
highly differentiated along the lines of talent for work of different kinds.
One derives this impression especially from the conditions surrounding the
development of their art, which are still mysterious and an interpretation of
which we shall attempt to give in the following chapter.

Page 333

Cultural, Racial, and Climatic Divisions
The Upper Palæolithic covers the greater part of the 'Reindeer Epoch' as it
was conceived by Lartet and Christy, who began their systematic study and
exploration of the caves of Dordogne in 1863. They were soon joined by
Massénat and the Marquis de Vibraye, while Dupont took up the work in
Belgium and Piette made the artistic development, especially in the
Pyrenees, his chosen field.
Lartet was the first to perceive that the culture of the grotto of Aurignac was
quite distinct from that of the Lower Palæolithic in northern France; he also
recognized in the shelter of Laugerie Haute, in Dordogne, that there was
still another culture, which is now known as the Solutrean; also that in the
shelter of Laugerie Basse, in Dordogne, there was yet another industry, that
which we now know as Magdalenian. M. de Mortillet was the first to
recognize the superiority of the Solutrean industry in stone, which in this
period reached its height, and its succession by the Magdalenian period, in
which the industry in bone and horn reached a climax; but he failed to
recognize the very important preceding position of the Aurignacian, and it
was not until 1906 that the clear presentation by Breuil of the entire
distinctness of the Aurignacian industry led to the adoption by the
Archæological Congress at Geneva of three cultural divisions of the Upper
Palæolithic. In the meantime Piette had discovered that in the Mas d'Azil
there was a distinct cultural phase, the Azilian, following the Magdalenian,
and thus a fourfold division of the Upper Palæolithic (Breuil,(7)
Obermaier(8)) was established, as follows:
AZILIAN.—Industry of the surviving Crô-Magnon and other
resident races, and of newly arrived brachycephalic and
dolichocephalic races in western Europe; decadent forms of flint
and bone workmanship; entire absence of art. Daun stage of
Postglacial retreat; Europe with a milder climate and forest and
meadow fauna like that of early historic times.
MAGDALENIAN.—Closing stage of the industry and art of the
Crô-Magnon race; bone implements highly developed; marked
decline in the flint industry. Close of Postglacial Period; climate
alternately cold and moist (corresponding with the Bühl and

Page 334

Gschnitz Postglacial advances of the ice in the Alpine region), or
cold and arid; Europe covered with the tundra and steppe fauna;
life chiefly in the shelters and grottos.
SOLUTREAN.—Culminating stage of flint industry; apparent
invasion in eastern Europe of the Brünn (Brüx, Předmost, and
[?] Galley Hill) race. The highly developed flint industry of the
Solutrean types; art development of the Crô-Magnon race partly
suspended. Dry, cold climate; life largely in the open.
AURIGNACIAN.—Appearance of the Crô-Magnon race in
southwestern Europe, succeeding the Mousterian industry; art of
engraving and drawing and sculpture of human and animal
forms developing. Animal life the same as during the fourth
glaciation; climate cold and increasingly dry; life chiefly in the
grottos and shelters.
The successive phases of development of Upper Palæolithic industry and
art have been traced with extraordinary precision in Dordogne, in the
Pyrenees, in northern Spain, and along the Danube and upper Rhine by a
host of able workers—Cartailhac, Capitan, Peyrony, Bouyssonnie, Lalanne,
and others. Breuil has made himself master especially of the Aurignacian
and has succeeded Piette as the great historian of Upper Palæolithic art.
Obermaier's chief service has been the comparison of the Upper Palæolithic
of the Danubian region with that of the Dordogne and northern Spain both
in regard to the geologic age and the archæologic and racial succession. The
labors of Schmidt along the upper Rhine and Danube have not only brought
this region into definite prehistoric relation with the Dordogne and the
Pyrenees but have given us by far the clearest evidence of the relation
between the human and the industrial development and the succession of
climatic phases in northern Europe. Finally, the explorations of Commont
along the River Somme have proved that this region, too, was frequented
throughout all Upper Palæolithic times, during which it exhibits an
industrial development hardly less important than that of the Lower
Palæolithic.
There are two very distinct lines of thought among these archæologists: the
first is shown in the tendency to regard the industries as mainly

Page 335

autochthonous, or as following local lines of development; the exponents of
this theory dwell most strongly on the transitions between the Mousterian,
the Aurignacian, and the Solutrean industries. For example, the chief object
of Schuchhardt's tour(9) through the Palæolithic stations of Dordogne was to
observe the transitions from one period to another and the evidence
afforded of successive changes of climate. This writer is impressed with the
transitions; he notes that the typical curved knives of the Abri Audit furnish
a transition from the Mousterian scrapers to the Aurignacian 'points' of La
Gravette and La Font Robert; that the Solutrean takes up all the fine threads
of the Aurignacian culture and spins them further into Magdalenian times.
Thus we get an Aurignacian-Solutrean-Magdalenian industrial cycle which
is comparable to the Chellean-Acheulean-Mousterian cycle.
Breuil, on the other hand, from the archæologist's standpoint—because he is
not especially interested in the matter of racial development—is a strong
exponent of the idea of successive invasions of cultures, either from the
south or Mediterranean region or from the central region of Europe, which
he calls the 'Atlantic'; and he distinguishes sharply between these two great
areas of Upper Palæolithic evolution, namely, the southern and the central
European, pointing out that it was only after the establishment of more
genial climatic conditions, like those of modern times, that there was an
added element of northern or Baltic invasion. Certainly the archæologic
testimony strongly supports this culture-invasion hypothesis and it appears
to be strengthened in a measure by the study of the human types, although
this study has not progressed beyond the stage of hypothesis. When the
Upper Palæolithic races have been studied with as close attention as those
of the Lower Palæolithic we may be able to establish positively the relation
between these human types and the advance of certain cultures and
industries.

Distribution of Upper Palæolithic Human Fossils
Our present view, as drawn from a consideration of the facts before us, is
that western Europe in Upper Palæolithic times was entered by four or five
distinct races, all belonging to Homo sapiens, only three of which became
established:

Page 336

5. The Furfooz (Ofnet, and [?] Grenelle) race, extremely broad-
headed, entering central Europe possibly from central Asia,
bringing an Azilian culture, without art or developed flint
industry. (Alpine type.)
4. A dolichocephalic race with a narrow face, associated with
the Furfooz race, either connected with the Brünn and Brüx, or
an advance wave of one of the dolichocephalic Neolithic races.
(Mediterranean type.)
3. The Brünn (Brüx, Předmost, and [?] Galley Hill) race, long-
headed, with a narrow, short face, probably entering central
Europe directly from Asia through Hungary and along the
Danube; bringing a perfected Solutrean culture; inferior in brain
development to the Crô-Magnons, in industrial contact with
them but not displacing them.
2. The Crô-Magnon race, long-headed with a very broad face,
entering Europe in closing Mousterian or early Aurignacian
times, probably from the south along the Mediterranean coast,
and bringing in an Aurignacian flint industry and art spirit
characteristic especially of Aurignacian and Magdalenian times;
greatly reduced in number in closing Magdalenian times, but
leaving descendants in various colonies in western Europe.
1. The Grimaldi race, in the transition between the Mousterian
and the Aurignacian; negroid or African in character; apparently
never established as a race of any influence in western Europe.
The presence of these five races, and perhaps of a sixth if the 'Aurignacian
man' of Klaatsch proves to be distinct from the Crô-Magnon, is firmly
established by anatomy. It is most important constantly to keep before our
minds certain great principles of racial evolution: (1) that the development
of a racial type, whether long-headed or broad-headed, narrow-faced or
broad-faced, of tall or of short stature, must necessarily be very slow; (2)
that this development of the races which invaded western Europe took place
for the most part to the eastward in the vast continent of Asia and eastern
Europe; (3) that, once established through a long process of isolation and
separate evolution, these racial types are extremely stable and persistent;

Page 337

their head form, their bodily characters, and especially their psychic
characters and tendencies are not readily modified or altered; nor are they in
any marked degree blended by crossing. Crosses do not produce merely
blends; they chiefly produce a mosaic of distinct characters derived from
one race or the other.

Larger Image

Fig. 135. Geographic
distribution of Upper
Palæolithic human
fossils in western
Europe.

We must therefore imagine western Europe in Upper Palæolithic times
again as a terminal region; a great peninsula toward which the human

Page 338

migrants from the east and from the south came to mingle and superpose
their cultures. These races took the great migration routes which had been
followed by other waves of animal life before them; they were pressed upon
from behind by the increasing populations of the east; they were attracted to
western Europe as a fresh and wonderful game country, where food in the
forests, in the meadows, and in the streams abounded in unparalleled
profusion. The Crô-Magnons especially were a nomadic hunting people,
perfectly fitted by their physical structure for the chase and developing an
extraordinary appreciation of the beauty and majesty of the varied forms of
animal life which existed in no other part of the world at the time. Between
the retreating Alpine and Scandinavian glaciers Europe was freely open
toward the eastern plains of the Danube, extending to central and southern
Asia; on the north, however, along the Baltic, the climate was still too
inclement for a wave of human migration, and there is no trace of man
along these northern shores until the close of the Upper Palæolithic, nor of
any residence of man in the Scandinavian peninsula until the great wave of
Neolithic migration established itself in that region.

Larger Image

Fig. 136. Epitome of human
history in western
Europe during the Third

Page 339

Interglacial, Fourth
Glacial, and Postglacial
Stages; showing also the
three Postglacial
advances and retreats
which succeeded the
close of the Fourth
Glacial Stage in the
Alpine region,
theoretically
corresponding with the
climatic vicissitudes of
Postglacial time. From
the data of Penck and
Schmidt. Drawn by C. A.
Reeds. (Compare Fig.
14.)

The climatic and cultural relations of Upper Palæolithic times may be
correlated[AL] in descending order as follows:
6. The Daun or final Postglacial advance of the glaciers of the
Alps, estimated at 7,000 B. C. Europe with its modern or
prehistoric forest fauna, the lion lingering in the Pyrenees, the
moose in Spain. Azilian-Tardenoisian, closing stage of the
Upper Palæolithic culture; western Europe peopled by the
broad-headed race of Furfooz and Ofnet, also by a narrow-
headed race. Baltic Migration, Maglemose culture.
5. The Gschnitz stage in the Alps or second Postglacial advance.
Climate still cold and moist but gradually moderating. Decline
of the Magdalenian. Period of the retreat of the tundra and
steppe animals; mammoth, reindeer, and arctic rodents
becoming more rare; Eurasiatic forest mammals becoming more
abundant.

Page 340

Close of steppe period. Crô-Magnon race still dominant in
western Europe in the Late Magdalenian stage of culture.
4. Interval between the Bühl and Gschnitz Postglacial advances
in the Alps. A renewed steppe and 'loess' period. Climate cold
and dry. Mammoth and woolly rhinoceros, reindeer, full tundra
and steppe fauna very abundant. Crô-Magnon race in the stage
of Middle Magdalenian culture.
3. The Bühl stage of Postglacial advance in the Alps; renewal of
severe conditions of cold moist climate, and spread all over
western Europe of the arctic banded and Obi lemmings of the
Upper Rodent Layer. Bühl moraines in Lake Lucerne estimated
as having been deposited between 16,000 and 24,000 years B.
C. Crô-Magnon race dominant in the Early Magdalenian stage
of culture.
2. Period of the first Postglacial interval or Achen retreat of the
glaciers in the Alpine region. A dry cold climate. Crô-Magnon
and Brünn races in the stage of Solutrean culture.
1. Close of fourth glaciation, between 24,000 and 40,000 years
B. C. Cold and moist but increasingly dry climate succeeding
the fourth glaciation and deposition of Lower Rodent Layer, or
first invasion of the arctic tundra rodents. Crô-Magnon and
possibly Aurignacian race in the stage of Aurignacian culture.

BEGINNING OF THE UPPER PALÆOLITHIC
The Aurignacian Industry
We now glance at western Europe as it was between 25,000 and 30,000
years ago, at the opening of the Upper Palæolithic.
During Aurignacian times France was still broadly connected with Great
Britain.(11) The British Islands were not only united with each other but
with the continent, while the elevation of the Scandinavian peninsula
converted the Baltic Sea into a great fresh-water lake, the old shores of

Page 341

which are readily traced. Geikie also maintains that the rise of land in
Scotland after the fourth glaciation was accompanied by an amelioration of
climate and the advent of more genial conditions; a strong forest growth
covered the lowlands, hence this is termed the Lower Forestian stage of the
physiographic history of northern Britain; it corresponds to the temporary
period of the retreat of the glaciers in the Alpine region, which Penck has
named the Achenschwänkung. The latter author is not inclined to connect
any marked rise of temperature in the Alpine region with this interval of
time; to our knowledge no fossil plant beds have been preserved which
would give us such indications, and the animal life, as we shall see,
certainly affords only a very slight indication of a rise in temperature in the
retreat of certain of the snow-loving tundra and northern steppe lemmings
to the north; the greater number of tundra forms remained. The continental
elevation of the northern coast-line of Europe would explain the advent of a
dry continental climate and the renewal of high prevailing winds, at least
during the warmer and drier summer seasons, for it is certain that
atmospheric conditions such as produced the great dust-storms and
deposition of 'loess' after the second and third glaciations prevailed again in
western Europe after the fourth glaciation. This gave rise to deposits of
what is known among geologists as the 'newer loess,' and we find these
sheets of 'newer loess' spreading immediately above the Mousterian culture
at a number of different points in western Europe.
When the Crô-Magnon race entered this part of Europe the climate was
becoming more dry and stimulating; the summers were warm or temperate,
the winters very severe. Great ice-caps still spread over the Scandinavian
peninsula and also over the Alps, but the borders of the ice-fields no longer
reached the plains; in a sense, the Glacial Epoch had not yet closed, for
during the whole period of Postglacial time the glaciers of the Alps,
beginning in early Magdalenian times, developed three renewed advances,
each somewhat less vigorous than the preceding one, with intervening
stages of a drier climate.

Page 342

Fig. 137. 'Tectiforms'—
schematic drawings in
lines and dots believed to
represent huts and larger
shelters built of logs and
covered with hides.
From the walls of the
cavern of Font-de-
Gaume, Dordogne. After
Breuil.

The greater number of the Aurignacian stations, like those of Mousterian
times, were under the shelters or within the entrances of the grottos and
caverns; all the stations in southwestern France are of this character. There
was, however, a great open camp at Solutré, which was a most famous

Page 343

hunting station for the wild horse in Aurignacian times. In northern France
there are several open stations, such as those of Montières and St. Acheul,
along the River Somme, and to the east, along the middle Rhine, there are
several open 'loess' stations, such as those of Achenheim, Völklinshofen,
Rhens, and Metternich. It may very well be that these open stations were
visited only during the mild summer season. The continued choice of sites
which naturally afforded the greatest protection from the weather, in
France, Britain, Belgium, and all along the Danube, as well as in the genial
region of the Riviera, is a sure indication of a prevailing severe climate. It is
hardly possible, however, that the closed or protected stations were the only
residences of these people; they merely indicate the points where the flint
industry was continuously carried on and also the vast foyers and gathering
places; but there is little doubt from the evidence afforded by the signs on
the walls of the caverns, known as 'tectiforms,' that huts and large shelters
built of logs and covered with hides were grouped around most of these
stations and scattered through the country at points favorable for hunting
and fishing. These would be the only dwelling-places possible in such vast
open camps, for example, as Solutré.

Climate and Life of Aurignacian Times
3. First Postglacial Retreat, Achenschwänkung in the Alpine
region. Period of Solutrean industry. A cold dry climate, with
dust-storms and wide-spread deposition of 'loess' in western
Europe. Flint workers seeking many open stations. Horses and
wild asses numerous on the prairies; reindeer and wild cattle
very abundant.
2. Recession of the Ice-Fields of the Fourth Glaciation. Period
of Aurignacian industry. Climate cold and increasingly dry;
renewal of the dust-storms and deposits of the 'newer loess.'
Flint industry in the caverns, grottos, shelters, and a few open
stations. Opening of the Upper Palæolithic period. Arrival of the
Crô-Magnon race.
1. Final Stage of Fourth Glaciation. Close of the Lower
Palæolithic Mousterian culture. Gradual extinction of the

Page 344

Neanderthal race.
The arrival of the Crô-Magnon race and the beginning of the Aurignacian
industry took place during the period of retreat of the ice-fields of the fourth
glaciation. As we pass from the levels of the early Aurignacian industry into
those of the middle and upper Aurignacian, we find that the mammal life of
Mousterian times continued in its prime all over western Europe, with the
addition, one by one, of some new forms from the tundras, such as the
musk-ox, and the successive arrival from the mountains and steppes of
western Asia of such characteristic forms as the argali sheep and the wild
ass, or kiang.

Larger Image

Fig. 138. Geographic
distribution (horizontal
lines) of the reindeer,
mammoth, and woolly
rhinoceros, the three
chief mammals of the

Page 345

tundra fauna, with
reference to the retiring
ice-fields (dots) of the
Fourth Glacial Stage.
After Boule and Geikie.
(Compare Figs. 95 and
96.)

The extremely cold and moist climate of the fourth glaciation had passed,
and a somewhat drier but still extremely cold climatic condition prevailed
throughout western Europe. During the early Aurignacian the two northern
types of lemming, the banded lemming (Myodes torquatus) and the Obi
lemming (Myodes obensis), were still found along the upper Danube, as in
the grottos of Sirgenstein, Ofnet, and Bockstein. From middle Aurignacian
on through Solutrean times these denizens of the extreme north disappear
from this region of Europe. Further evidence of a dry, cold climate is found
in the recurrence of dust-storms and in the great deposits of 'newer loess'
beginning in certain parts of Europe at the very close of the Mousterian
industry and extending through both middle and late Aurignacian and
Solutrean times in all the region of the upper Rhine, along both shores of
the Danube, and westward in the valley of the Somme, in northern France.
This period is therefore believed to correspond with the Achen retreat of the
great glaciers still covering the Alpine region.
Another striking proof of the amelioration of climate is the return of the
flint workers to many of the open stations, old and new, in various parts of
western Europe, the climate being more endurable because less humid. In
Mousterian times the open stations were very rare and were perhaps visited
during the summer season only; in Aurignacian times they were more
abundant, there being twelve open stations out of a total of about sixty
stations thus far discovered; in Aurignacian and Solutrean times the type
station of Solutré was much frequented, and many other open camps are
found in various parts of western Europe.
This is still the Reindeer Period; in fact, it is the typical 'Reindeer Epoch' of
Lartet, and the predominant forms of life are the woolly mammoth and the

Page 346

woolly rhinoceros; but for a time the reindeer seems to have been less
abundant, and Aurignacian times are marked apparently by a very greatly
increased number of horses. The animal life throughout retains its northern
or arctic character; the tundra species predominate, the hardy forms of the
forests and meadows of Eurasia are next in number, and then are found a
few of the steppe forms, with here and there forms characteristic of the
Alps. The entire fauna of the Aurignacian may be summed up as follows:
The wild ass, or kiang, of the Asiatic deserts appears in late Aurignacian
times in the region of the upper Rhine and upper Danube, as seen in the
deposits of Wildscheuer, Thaingen, Kesslerloch, and Schweizersbild, and
also there probably arrived in Europe at this time the Elasmothere (E.
sibericum), a gigantic rhinoceros, distinguished from all others that we have
been considering by the entire absence of the anterior horn and by the
possession of an enormous single horn situated on the forehead above the
eyes, also by the elaborate foldings of the dental enamel, to which the name
'Elasmothere' refers; its teeth were especially adapted to a grassy diet; it
apparently wandered into Europe from the arid grassy plains of central and
western Asia, and its appearance is connected with the extensive
deforestation accompanying the tundra and steppe periods of mammalian
life.
Tundra Life.
Reindeer, woolly mammoth, woolly rhinoceros, musk-ox (rare),
arctic fox, arctic hare, arctic wolverene, arctic ptarmigan.
Banded and Obi lemmings in lower Aurignacian only.
Alpine Life.
Argali sheep, ibex, alpine ptarmigan.
Steppe Life.
Steppe horse, kiang, central Asiatic ass.
Forest Life.
Red deer, roe-deer, giant deer, brown bear, cave-bear, wildcat, wolf,
fox, otter, lynx, weasel.
Meadow Life.
Bison, wild cattle.

Page 347

Asiatic Life.
Cave-hyæna, cave-lion, ? cave-leopard.
These periodic arrivals from central Asia suggest the existence of migration
routes which may also have been followed by tribes of Palæolithic hunters.
There is no evidence at this time of the presence of the more characteristic
animals of the steppes, such as the saiga antelope, the jerboa, and the steppe
hamster, which enter Europe during the later period of Magdalenian culture.
As an indication, perhaps, of the dryness of the climate we observe that the
moose (Alces) is no longer recorded, although it reappears in western
Europe in later Magdalenian times. The giant deer (Megaceros) appears in
southern Germany with the early Aurignacian culture, but this would seem
to be the time of its extinction, because it does not occur in association with
any of the later industries. For a time the bison in Dordogne, in southern
Germany, and in Austria appears to be far more abundant than the wild
cattle; the latter animals are not recorded either by Schmidt or Déchelette in
association with the Aurignacian culture, but they reappear in the moister
period of Magdalenian times.
The remains of similar late Pleistocene mammals lie scattered over a large
area in Britain, and we must conclude from their presence, observes
Dawkins,(12) that Britain was still broadly connected with the mainland of
Europe. This is proved by the occurrence of the mammoth fauna in various
places now covered by the sea, as in Holyhead Harbor, off the coasts of
Devonshire and of Sussex, and in the North Sea. On the Dogger Bank the
accumulation of bones, teeth, and antlers is so great that the fishermen of
Yarmouth have collected in their nets and dredges more than three hundred
specimens. They belong to the bear, wolf, cave-hyæna, giant deer, Irish elk,
reindeer, stag, bison, urus, horse, woolly rhinoceros, mammoth, and beaver,
and are to be viewed as the remains of animals deposited by river currents,
as in the case of similar accumulations on land. Had they been deposited by
the sea they would have been sifted by the action of the waves, the smaller
being heaped together in one place and the larger in another. The carcasses
had evidently been collected in the eddies of a river that helped to form the
Dogger Bank, which now rises to within eight fathoms of the sea-level.

Page 348

One of the animals of the Aurignacian period which is best known is the
'horse of Solutré.' Around the great Aurignacian camp at Solutré there
accumulated the remains of a vast number of horses, which are estimated at
not less than 100,000; the bones are distributed in a wide circle around the
ancient camp, consisting of broken or entire skeletons compacted into a
veritable magma, with which occur also remains of the reindeer, the urus,
and the mammoth interbedded with all the types of Aurignacian
implements. The majority of these horses belong to the stout-headed, short-
limbed forest or northern type, measuring 54 inches (13.2 hands) at the
withers, and about the size of the existing pony.(13) The joints and hoofs
were especially large, and the long teeth and powerful jaws were adapted to
feeding on coarse grasses; the greater part of the remains are those of horses
from five to seven years of age. There is no evidence that the men of
Aurignacian times either bred or reared these animals; they pursued them
only for food. The discovery that the horse might be used as an animal of
transport appears to have been made in the far East, and not in western
Europe.
The animal and plant life of the Aurignacian station near Krems, on the
Danube, above Vienna,(14) includes a strong element of the tundra forms—
the arctic fox, wolverene, mammoth, rhinoceros, musk-ox, reindeer, hare,
and ptarmigan. The steppe fauna, on the other hand, is rare, including only
the suslik, but not the saiga antelope or any of the other characteristic
steppe types. The principal objects of the chase were not only the
mammoth, which was extraordinarily abundant, but also the reindeer and
wild horses; the ibex is rare.
Obermaier observes that the chart of the geographic distribution of the
Aurignacian shows this culture to belong essentially to the provinces
surrounding the entire Mediterranean, from Syria (the grottos of Lebanon)
through north Africa (Algiers) to Spain. It also has a strong development
throughout France, entering middle and southern Germany and passing
along the Danube to Austria, Poland, and southern Russia (Mezine) north of
Kiev. There is no doubt that the mammoth hunters of Krems belonged in
this wide-spread distribution; the shells used for ornaments, which
unmistakably recall those of the Riviera, are only in part local from the
neighborhood of Vienna; the larger part is from the Mediterranean. We may
imagine that these shells passed through several hands among this race of

Page 349

nomadic hunters, and this is not surprising in view of the girdle which the
Aurignacian stretched around the entire Mediterranean Sea.

Discovery of the Crô-magnon Race
The earliest discovery of a member of this race was that by Buckland, in the
cave of Paviland, which opens on the face of a steep limestone cliff, about a
mile east of Rhossilly, on the coast of Gower, Wales.(15) As described by
Sollas, a painted skeleton, long known as the 'Red Lady,' was found in the
kitchen midden which forms the floor of this cave; recent investigation has
proved that this skeleton belongs to a man of the Crô-Magnon race; the
associated implements are of Aurignacian type. Paviland cave is thus the
first Aurignacian station discovered in Britain and marks the most westerly
outpost of the Crô-Magnon race.

Larger Image

Fig. 139. Section of the
sepulchral grotto of
Aurignac, the type
station of Aurignacian

Page 350

culture, as restored by
Lartet from the
description of the
original condition of the
grotto as it was in 1852.
After Lyell.

In 1852 the sepulchral grotto of Aurignac, on the nearest spur of the
Pyrenees, in Haute-Garonne, was accidentally discovered by a laborer. It
was almost filled with bones, among which were two entire skulls and
many fragments, numbering altogether no less than seventeen skeletons of
both sexes and of all ages. The mayor of Aurignac ordered all the bones to
be taken out and re-interred in the parish cemetery. Thus, in 1860, when
Lartet visited this grotto and determined it as the type station of a distinct
industry, all the human remains had been lost beyond recovery, and with
them all possibility of learning to what race, culture, and geologic age they
belonged. On a sloping terrace in front of the grotto was the hearth
containing one hundred flint implements, mingled with the remains of a
typical reindeer fauna.

Page 351

Larger Image

Fig. 140. Section of the Grotto
of Crô-Magnon, in
which the fossilized
skeleton of the 'Old Man
of Crô-Magnon,' type of
the Crô-Magnon race,
was discovered in 1868,
together with the remains
of four other individuals.
After Louis Lartet. Scale
= 1-125.

In 1868 Lartet explored a grotto in the little hamlet of Crô-Magnon, near
Les Eyzies, on the Vézère, where he found five skeletons, which have
become the type of the great Crô-Magnon race of Upper Palæolithic times.
The grotto was accidentally discovered by workmen building a road in the
Vézère valley. Here Lartet found the skeleton of an old man, now known as

Page 352

the 'old man of Crô-Magnon'; then that of a woman, whose forehead bore
the mark of a wound from some heavy blow; close to her lay the fragments
of a child's skeleton and near by those of two young men. Flint implements
and perforated shells were found with these skeletons.
In May, 1868, the material was first described by Broca,(16) his excellent
account being later reprinted and amplified in the Reliquiæ Aquitanicæ of
Lartet and Christy.(17) Broca referred to these skeletons as incontestable
proofs of the contemporaneous existence of man and the mammoth. The
associated mammalian life was that of the reindeer and the industry is now
known to be of the Aurignacian stage. In his classic original description of
this type Broca remarks upon the high stature, the face very broad in
relation to its height, with very long and very narrow orbits; the large and
markedly dolichocephalic skull, with an unusually large brain capacity,
noting that the brain capacity of the Crô-Magnon woman surpasses that of
the average male of to-day; the forehead correspondingly broad, vertical,
convex on the median line; the bones of the limbs robust, and the shin-
bones flattened transversely; altogether a very high racial type of skeleton
belonging to the species Homo sapiens.

Page 353

Fig. 141. Head of the very tall
skeleton of Crô-Magnon
type discovered in the
Grotte des Enfants. After
Verneau. One-quarter life
size.

Page 354

Fig. 142. Head of the 'Old
Man of Crô-Magnon,'
rejuvenated by the
restoration of the teeth,
showing the method of
restoration of the
features adopted in all
the models by J. H.
McGregor. The diameter
of the head across the
cheek-bones is seen to be
greater than that across
the cranium. (Compare
Figs. 146 and 147, also
Pl. VI.)

Verneau,(18) in his description of the Crô-Magnon type, emphasizes the
disharmonic form of the head, for the dolichocephalic form of the skull is

Page 355

combined with a face very broad for its height, and this, in fact, is the
unique and most distinctive feature of the Crô-Magnon race. The cheek-
bones are both broad and high. It is curious that in this face, so broad across
the cheek-bones and cheek arches, the space between the eyes is small, the
nose is narrow and aquiline, and the upper jaw is noticeably narrow; it is no
less remarkable that this upper jaw projects forward, while the upper part of
the face is almost vertical, as in the highest types of Homo sapiens. The eye
sockets, which are remarkably broad, are rather shallow, and their angles
are but slightly rounded off, so that the form suggests a very long rectangle;
the mandible is thick and strong, and the chin massive, triangular, and very
prominent; the marks of muscular attachment denote great muscular
development around the thick, strong jaws, in which the parts for the
attachment of the vertical muscles are unusually large. I would add, says
Verneau, to these essential characteristics the surprising capacity of the
cranium, which Broca estimated as at least 1,590 c.cm. The majority of
these features are found in almost all of the skulls of the Crô-Magnon race
in the Grottes de Grimaldi. The top view of the skull is unusual on account
of the extreme prominence of the eminences of the parietals, which give the
skull a pentagonal effect when seen from above. The eyebrow ridges show
decided prominences above the orbits but disappear completely in the
median line and at the sides and thus differ totally from those in the
Neanderthal head.
DISCOVERIES CHIEFLY OF THE CRÔ-MAGNON AND GRIMALDI
RACES[AM]
Referred to Aurignacian Times
Date of Number of
Locality Culture Stage
Discovery Individuals
Crô-Magnon and (?) Aurignacian Race
1823. Paviland cave, western One skeleton. Aurignacian.
Wales. Burial.
1852. Aurignac, Haute- Seventeen ? "
Garonne, Pyrenees, skeletons.
France. Burial.
1868. valign="top"Crô- Three incomplete "
Magnon, Dordogne, skeletons

Page 356

France. and fragments
of two others.
? Burial.
1872- Grottes de Grimaldi, Burial.
1884. Baoussé-Roussé, Italy.
1. Grotte des Four skeletons. "
Enfants (Grotte de
Grimaldi).
2. Grotte de One " "
Cavillon.
3. Barma Grande. Six " "
4. Baousso da Three " "
Torre.
1909. Combe-Capelle, Type of Homo "
Dordogne. aurignacensis,
Klaatsch.
Burial.
1909. Laugerie Haute, One skeleton. ? "
Dordogne. Burial.
Solutré. Fragments. ? "
Camargo (Santander), Fragment of "
Spain. skull.
Willendorf, Austria. Fragments. Late
Aurignacian.
Cave of Antelias Scattered bones. Aurignacian.
(Syria).
Grimaldi Race
1906. Grottes de Grimaldi,
Baoussé-Roussé, Italy.
1. Grotte des Two skeletons. Aurignacian
Enfants (Grotte de or
Grimaldi). Late
Mousterian.

Of the numerous skeletons found in the Grottes de Grimaldi, or Baoussé-
Roussé, near Mentone, the one first discovered is most widely known as the

Page 357

'man of Mentone,' which was found in the Grotte de Cavillon, in 1872, by
Rivière; hence this is sometimes spoken of as the Mentone race; but, as
Verneau shows, while the measurements of the skulls of Baoussé-Roussé
show some variety, they do not exceed what might be expected in
individual variation, and we conclude that all the men of tall stature found
in the Grottes de Grimaldi belong to the Crô-Magnon race, which is not to
be confused with the very distinct dwarf Grimaldi race discovered in the
Grottes de Grimaldi by Verneau, in 1906, in a lower level than any of the
skeletons of the Crô-Magnon type.
In Aurignacian times, lofty stature seems to have been a general
characteristic of this race, but there appears to have been a gradual decrease
in height, so that in later industrial times the race in general is somewhat
smaller in stature. The heights are as follows:

1.80 5 ft. 10¾
Crô-Magnon type of Dordogne
m. in.
" woman slightly inferior in
size.
Baoussé-Roussé, Grottes de Grimaldi.
Adult males of
1.79 5 ft. 10½
Cavillon
m. in.
1.82 5 ft. 11½
Barma Grande II
m. in.
1.85 6 ft. ¾
Baousso da Torre II
m. in.
1.93
Barma Grande I 6 ft. 4 in.
m.
1.94 6 ft. 4½
Grotte des Enfants
m. in.
1.87 6 ft. 1½
Average
m. in.

Page 358

1.65
Woman of Barma Grande estimated at 5 ft. 5 in.
m.
Youth of 15 years, Barma Grande, 1.65
5 ft. 5 in.
estimated at m.

The woman had not reached complete development. As there is a variation
of 6 inches in the height of the various male skeletons, it is evident that we
cannot reach a trustworthy conclusion from a single subject; but there
would seem to be quite a disparity in height between the sexes.

Fig. 143. The abri or shelter
of Laugerie Haute,
Dordogne, France, where
the Aurignacian burial of
a skeleton referred to the

Page 359

Crô-Magnon race, was
discovered in 1909.
Photograph by Belvès.

The very large skeleton from the Grotte des Enfants, measuring 6 feet 4½
inches, was found associated with the remains of the reindeer, 15 feet below
the surface, from which it would appear probable that the skeleton antedates
the Aurignacian skeleton of Laugerie Haute, and even of Crô-Magnon. Thus
the so-called man of Mentone may be an ancestor of the race which was
found in Crô-Magnon and other regions of Dordogne. It is these men of
great height, found in Barma Grande and the Grotte des Enfants, which
Verneau selects for his description of the primitive members of the Crô-
Magnon race, which at this time lived along the Riviera and in the valley of
the Vézère and later spread over a vast area in western Europe. It is
probable that in the genial climate of the Riviera these men obtained their
finest development; the country was admirably protected from the cold
winds of the north, refuges were abundant, and game by no means scarce,
to judge from the quantity of animal bones found in the caves. Under such
conditions of life the race enjoyed a fine physical development and
dispersed widely.

Page 360

Fig. 144. Comparative view
of the Neanderthal
skeleton (left) from La
Chapelle-aux Saints, and
of the skeleton of a very
tall member of the Crô-
Magnon race (right)
discovered in the Grotte
des Enfants. After Boule
and Verneau. Both
figures are
approximately one-
seventeenth life size.

Page 361

Fig. 145. Sections of the tibia
or shin-bone, (1) the
normal triangular type;
and (2) the extremely
platycnæmic flattened
type characteristic of the
Crô-Magnon race. After
Broca.

With an average height of 6 feet 1½ inches, these cave-dwellers may be said
to demonstrate one of the most striking traits of the Crô-Magnon race. In
the proportions of the limbs and in the great size of the upper part of the
chest these men are removed from the modern European type and approach
some of the African negroid types, although there is not the least
resemblance to the negro type in the skull or in the dentition. In contrast
with the Neanderthals are three characters of the limbs: the leg was very
long in comparison with the arm; they show a remarkable lengthening of
the forearm in proportion to the upper arm and a still more remarkable
lengthening of the lower leg or shin-bone in proportion to the thigh-bone;

Page 362

the tibia has an index of 81-86 per cent as compared with the femur, which
is relatively greater than that of the average modern European, with a
tibiofemoral index of 79.7 per cent. This long shin-bone indicates that these
men were swift of foot, quite in keeping with their undoubted nomadic
habits and wide distribution. The flatness of the tibia, which is strongly
marked in 62 per cent of the skeletons, may well be due to the habit of
squatting while engaged in fashioning flints and in other industrial
occupations. The leg, long in comparison with the arm, and the thigh-bone,
strongly developed, are both characters of a hunting race. The foot has a
very protruding heel, but the sole and the toes are of moderate length. The
hip-girdle is of a type which has nothing negroid about it, but is as fine as
that of the most civilized whites; it is marked by its strength, the
augmentation of all the vertical and transverse diameters, and the reduction
of the anteroposterior diameters. The shoulders are exceptionally broad.
The fact that the arms are relatively short as compared with the legs is also
a high racial character. The upper arm is very robust, and in some cases the
left arm is more largely developed, in others the right.
In all the skulls from these grottos near Mentone, the face shows the
essential features of the Crô-Magnon race, its breadth being due to the
development of the cheek-bones and the zygomatic arches, for the upper
jaws are narrow, and the nose is thin or leptorhine. At the root the nose
shows a marked depression, but it rises immediately to a considerable
prominence; it thus undoubtedly had an aquiline profile. The orbits always
present the form of a long rectangle, so characteristic of the race along the
Vézère. All these characters leave no doubt of the racial affinity of the
skeletons from the Grottes de Grimaldi with the original Crô-Magnon type.
It must be concluded, therefore, that certain peculiar features noted in the
type of the 'old man of Crô-Magnon' are purely individual, and that we are
not justified in assuming the admixture of a foreign element to account for
the weakness of some characteristics which we notice in the majority of the
Crô-Magnon subjects from the caves of Grimaldi.
The highly evolved characters of the skeleton in this race are in keeping
with the extraordinarily great cranial capacity. Broca estimated the 'old man
of Crô-Magnon' as having a cranial capacity of 1,590 c.cm., and in the
female the brain is estimated at 1550 c.cm. Verneau estimates the five large
male skulls of Crô-Magnon type at Grimaldi as having an average capacity

Page 363

of 1,800 c.cm., the lowest being 1,715 c.cm., and the highest 1,880 c.cm.
This race, observes Keith,(21) was one of the finest the world has ever seen.
The wide, short face, the extremely prominent cheek-bones, the spread of
the palate and a tendency of the upper cutting teeth and incisors to project
forward, and the narrow, pointed chin recall a facial type which is best seen
to-day in tribes living in Asia to the north and to the south of the Himalayas.
As regards their stature the Crô-Magnon race recalls the Sikhs living to the
south of the Himalayas. In the disharmonic proportions of the face, that is,
the combination of broad cheek-bones and narrow skull, they resemble the
Eskimo. The sum of the Crô-Magnon characters is certainly Asiatic rather
than African, whereas in the Grimaldis the sum of the characters is
decidedly negroid or African.

Page 364

Fig. 146. Restoration of the
head of the 'Old Man of
Crô-Magnon,' in profile,
modelled after the type
skull of Crô-Magnon,
Dordogne, with the teeth
restored and the head
given a younger
appearance. After the
model by J. H.
McGregor. One-quarter
life size.

We shall trace this great race through the Solutrean and Magdalenian stages
of the Upper Palæolithic and consider its disappearance and possible
distribution at the close of Magdalenian times. It will then be interesting to
consider the evidence of the survival of the descendants of this race in
various parts of western Europe and possibly among the primitive
inhabitants of the Canary Islands, known as the Guanches.

Page 365

Fig. 147. Restoration of the
head of the 'Old Man of
Crô-Magnon,' front view.
After the model by J. H.
McGregor. One-quarter
life size.

Evidence of Other Races
It is a mooted question whether the Crô-Magnons were the only people
inhabiting Europe in early Aurignacian time or whether there were also two
other races, the Grimaldi and the Aurignacian. As we have seen in the
preceding pages, there is no evidence that the negroid Grimaldi race ever
became established in Europe; the idea of the presence of a negroid race has

Page 366

taken the fancy of archæologists like Breuil and Rutot, when seeking an
African, Egyptian, or Bushman analogy in certain phases of early
Aurignacian art; but it rests merely on the slender evidence afforded by the
isolated skeletons of a woman and of a boy.
The case of the Aurignacian race is different; this is held by competent
anatomists (Klaatsch,(22) Keith(23)) to be distinct from the Crô-Magnon race
and to bear some resemblance to the Brünn (Brüx, Předmost, [?] Galley
Hill) race which, we know, became established in central Europe certainly
as early as Solutrean times, if not before.
The so-called Aurignacian race (Homo sapiens aurignacensis), described as
a subspecies of existing man, is based upon a type found in the shelter of
Combe-Capelle near Montferrand, Périgord, in the summer of 1909 by O.
Hauser.(24) It is commonly known as the 'Combe-Capelle' man from the
scene of its discovery, or as the Aurignacian man (Homo aurignacensis); if
a subspecies, it certainly belongs to Homo sapiens. The adult male skeleton
was discovered lying undisturbed in the lowest stratum of an Aurignacian
industry and was carefully disinterred by Klaatsch and Hauser. It was
apparently a case of ceremonial burial; a great number of unusually fine
flints of early Aurignacian type was found with it, also a necklace of
perforated shells (Littorina, Nassa); the limbs were bent.(25) Water saturated
with lime had dripped upon the burial-place, resulting in the remarkable
preservation of the skeleton. This skeleton is compared by Klaatsch with
that of Brünn, Moravia, and of Galley Hill, near London, from which he
concludes that it represents a distinct type, the Aurignacian race; the stature
is 5 feet 3 inches, as compared with 6 feet 1½, inches, the average in the
five Crô-Magnon males of Grimaldi; the brain case is well arched and falls
within the variation limits of Homo sapiens. The skull is very long and
narrow, the cephalic index being 65.7 per cent; in some points it shows a
striking similarity to that of Brünn, in others it varies from it in the direction
of the recent European form; the face is not narrow nor is it prognathous;
the lower jaw is small with a well-developed chin. Klaatsch finds many
characteristics resembling those of the Crô-Magnon race, including the
Chancelade type which is a late Crô-Magnon. He suggests that the Crô-
Magnon type may be considered a further development of the Aurignacian.
It seems probable that the Aurignacian man is a member of the true Crô-
Magnon race and that additional evidence is required to establish it as

Page 367

distinct. Schliz(26) considers that this skull is an intermediate form between
that of the Crô-Magnon and the Brünn race, an indication that these two
races were undergoing a parallel development.

Fig. 148. Brain outline of the
man of the so-called
Aurignacian race
discovered at Combe-
Capelle in 1909 (after
Klaatsch), as compared
with the brain outlines of
a chimpanzee and of
Homo sapiens.

Burial Customs
Similar customs of burial prevailed widely in Aurignacian times, as we
have observed from the use of color in the Paviland interment of western

Page 368

Wales and in the Brünn interment of Moravia. This is a feature seldom
found in the Neanderthal burials, although the latter are accompanied by
signs of great reverence and by an abundance of ornaments and finely
finished flints. Up to the present time the races of the Upper Palæolithic
have been studied with far less anatomical precision than those of the
Lower, and the attribution of many of the burials to the Crô-Magnon race
awaits verification.
We have little record of the Paviland burial except that the skeleton was that
of a man of the Crô-Magnon race and colored red. Of the burial of Aurignac
we have no record other than that seventeen skeletons were placed close
together; it would appear that this compound burial may have been the
sequel of a battle or, less probably, that of an epidemic. The type skeletons
of the Crô-Magnon race were simply lying on the surface of a deep shelter;
thus there has always been some doubt as to their exact archæological age;
a large number of perforated shells was found among the bones, as well as
pendants of ivory.
The most remarkable Crô-Magnon burials of undoubted Aurignacian age
are those of the Grottes de Grimaldi; the infant skeletons found here are
neither colored nor decorated, but occurred with a vast number of small
perforated shells (Nassa), evidently forming a sort of burial mantle.
Similarly, the female skeleton was enveloped in a bed of shells not
perforated; the legs were extended, while the arms were stretched beside the
body; there were a few pierced shells and a few bits of silex. One of the
large male skeletons of the same grotto had the lower limbs extended, the
upper limbs folded, and was decorated with a gorget and crown of
perforated shells; the head rested on a block of red stone. In the 'man of
Mentone,' found in 1872, the body rested on its left side, the limbs were
slightly flexed, and the forearm was folded; heavy stones protected the
body from disturbance; the head was decorated with a circle of perforated
shells colored in red, and implements of various types were carefully placed
on the forehead and chest. Similarly in the burial of Barma Grande three
skeletons were found placed side by side in a layer of red earth containing a
large quantity of peroxide of iron; two of the skeletons rested on the left
side, the limbs extended or slightly flexed; the forehead and chest and one
of the limbs were encircled with shells.

Page 369

In the burial of the so-called Aurignac man of Combe-Capelle, described
above, the limbs were outstretched and the body was decorated with a
necklace of perforated shells and surrounded with a great number of fine
Aurignacian flints. It appears that in all the numerous burials of these
grottos of Aurignacian age and industry of the Crô-Magnon race we have
the burial standards which prevailed in western Europe at this time.
We must infer that the conception of survival after death was among the
primitive beliefs, attested by the placing with the dead of ornaments and of
weapons and in many instances of objects of food. It is interesting to note
that the grottos and shelters were so frequently sought as places of burial,
also that the flexed limbs or extended position of the body prevailed
throughout western Europe into Neolithic times, as well as the use of color
through the Solutrean into Magdalenian times. It is probable from their love
of color in parietal decorations, and from the appearance of coloring matter
in so many of the burials, that decoration of the living body with color was
widely practised, and that color was freshly applied, either as pigment or in
the form of powder, to the bodies of the dead in order to prepare them for a
renewal of life.

Aurignacian Flint and Bone Industry
As pointed out in the introduction of this chapter, the geographical
distribution of the early Aurignacian industry is especially interesting in its
bearing upon the routes by which the Crô-Magnon race entered Europe.
"We can hardly contemplate an origin directly from the east," says Breuil,
(27) "because these earlier phases of the Aurignacian industry have not as
yet been met with in central or eastern Europe." A southerly origin seems
more probable, because the Aurignacian colonies appear to surround the
entire periphery of the Mediterranean, being found in northern Africa,
Sicily, and the Italian and Iberian peninsulas, from which they extended
over the larger part of southern France. In Tunis we find a very primitive
Aurignacian like that of the Abri Audit of Dordogne, with implements
undoubtedly similar to those of Chatelperron, in France. Even far to the
east, in the cave of Antelias, in Syria, as well as in certain stations of
Phœnicia,(28) culture deposits are found which are characteristically

Page 370

Aurignacian. Again, in southern Italy implements of typical Aurignacian
form, tending toward the superior stage, are found in the grotto of
Romanelli, Otranto.
On the other hand, in favor of the theory of local or autochthonous
evolution of this culture is the direct succession described below of
Aurignacian prototypes and early Aurignacian implements above the older
Mousterian layers in the various stations of Dordogne. In fact, the relation
of the Aurignacian industry to the preceding Mousterian is one of the most
important in the history of Palæolithic archæology, because of the change of
race which occurred at this time. How far is it derivative and
autochthonous, how far is it new and influenced by invasion and the
handicraft of a new and superior race?
Art.
Microlithique, microlith.
Burin, graver (first appearance).

Industrial.
Coup de poing, hand-stone (rare and degenerate).
Pointe, point.
[AN]Chatelperron (curved).
double-pointed.
Racloir, scraper.
convex.
concave.
straight.
double-edged.
triple-edged.
Grattoir, planing tool.
Perçoir, drill, borer.
Couteau, knife, blade.
Enclume, anvil stone.
Percuteur, hammer-stone.

War and Chase.
Pointe, point.
Pierre de jet, throwing stone.

Page 371

Couteau, knife, blade.
Pointe de lance, bone lance-heads.
First, as for transition from the older culture, it is important to note
throughout that the 'Aurignacian retouch' is identical with the Mousterian;
this retouch is on one side of the flake only and gives it a short, abrupt, and
blunt edge. As we shall see, it is essentially different from that discovered
by the Solutrean flint workers and employed in Solutrean times, a superior
technique which produced a sharp, thin edge, many of the implements being
dressed on both sides. On the other hand, Breuil concludes that the early
Aurignacian industry can only in part be derived from the late Mousterian
and that it is partly due to the invasion of a race which ranks much higher in
the scale of intelligence than the Neanderthal.

Fig. 149. Implements
designed for engraving
and sculpture. Evolution
of the angulate graving-
tool or burin, from the
early Aurignacian of
Chatelperron (left), to
the late Solutrean of
Placard (right). After

Page 372

Breuil. About one-third
actual size. These small
implements, chiefly
made from elongated
flakes and distinguished
by a sharp angulate edge
at one end suitable for
graving on bone or stone,
are especially
characteristic of the
Aurignacian stage of
culture, in which they
first appear. 1, 2.
Chatelperron points. 6.
Prototype of the
Magdalenian 'parrot-
beak.' Some of these
burins, such as 7, are
made into grattoirs or
planing tools at the other
end.

The pure early Aurignacian industry is seen in the regions of Dordogne and
the Pyrenees in the layers of Chatelperron, Germolles, Roche au Loup,
Haurets, and Gargas. The cave of Gudenushöhle, near Krems, in Lower
Austria, exhibits a very primitive phase of the early Aurignacian. Here
numerous small flints were found, resembling those found at Brive by the
Abbés Bardon and Bouyssonie; similar microliths are also found at Pair-
non-Pair, Gironde, at various stations in Dordogne, and at the Grottes de
Grimaldi, on the Riviera, in layers of corresponding age.
The chief invention of this stage is the 'Chatelperron point' (Fig. 149), a
direct development from the curved point of the Abri Audit (Fig. 151) and a
dominant type of the early Aurignacian culture. Small almond-shaped
'coups de poing' are still met with at Chatelperron and a few other localities,

Page 373

but Breuil suggests that these may not be real examples of Aurignacian
industry but implements carried off from older stations.
The use of elongated flakes is another feature of this early industry, but the
retouch of the edges cannot compare with the fine 'grooved retouch' of the
middle Aurignacian; as yet the flakes are thick and large. Many of the
scrapers are 'keeled' (grattoirs carénés).
An entirely new implement appears in addition to the triangular and
elongate flakes of flint shaped into points and scrapers of forms; this is the
primitive graving-tool, or burin, which at first is quite rare, but which we
know was designed by the Crô-Magnon artists for their early engravings on
stone (Fig. 149).
Art Implements.
Microlithique, microlith.
[AO]Burin, graver.
Ciseau, chisel.
[AO]Gravette, etching tool (first appearance).

New Industrial Implements.
Pointe, point (leaf-shaped).
[AO]Grattoir caréné, keeled scraper.
Perçoir, drill, borer.
[AO]curved (first appearance).
Couteau, knife, blade.
[AO]curved-in edges.
Poinçon, awl (bone).

New Implements of War and Chase.
Pointe à cran, shouldered point (stone).
Pointe de sagaie, javelin point (bone).
A fourth highly distinctive feature of the early Aurignacian is the use of a
variety of implements of bone and horn consisting chiefly of javelin points
and drills and of coarse, spatula-like tools.
In the middle Aurignacian the flake industry reaches its perfection of form
and technique; the edges of the flakes are shaped all around with the

Page 374

'grooved retouch' resulting in symmetrical forms such as the oval, double-
ended 'points,' the leaf-shaped 'points,' and the double scrapers; this, in fact,
is the culmination of the 'Aurignacian retouch,' which afterward begins to
decline. The retouch of the long flakes is fine and parallel, but as yet the
flakes themselves are generally thick and heavy, so that their ends are,
perforce, much broader than those of the Solutrean and Magdalenian
fashion. One of the most distinctive forms of this middle Aurignacian
industry is the 'keeled scraper' (grattoir caréné) with an abruptly grooved
retouch (Fig. 150).

Fig. 150. Implements suitable
for the dressing of hides
and for sculpture. The
keeled scraper or planing
tool—grattoir caréné—
characteristic of the
Aurignacian culture.
After Breuil. About two-
fifth actual size. 1, 2, 3.
Short and broad types
appearing in the middle
Aurignacian. 4, 5. More

Page 375

elongated types of the
advanced middle
Aurignacian from Crô-
Magnon, Dordogne. 6.
Elongated type (pic) of
the close of the middle
Aurignacian. 7, 8. Small
grattoirs with handles,
suitable for sculpture.

Still more significant in connection with the rapid artistic development of
these people is the remarkable increase in the number and variety of
graving-tools, including numerous curved gravers. Almost all the chief
types of gravers (burins) have now been invented, and tools of bone have
become extremely numerous and varied. To engraving and linear design
have been added the art of sculpture and the primitive use of color (Breuil,
(29) Schmidt(30)).

In the Dordogne region this evolution of the middle Aurignacian is
exemplified at Le Ruth, Le Roc de Combe-Capelle, and the principal layers
of the Abri Audit as well as at the shelter of Laussel. It is well developed
also at Le Trilobite, on the headwaters of the Seine.
In the late Aurignacian (Breuil,(31) Obermaier(32)) there is a notable
departure from the Mousterian fashion of chipping the flakes; even the
distinctive blunt 'Aurignacian retouch' is somewhat weakened; but at the
same time the work on the elongated flakes becomes more facile and
skilful. For delicate, artistic work there appear extremely small implements
or 'microliths' of various shapes.
Art.
Microlithique, microlith.
Burin, graver.
Ciseau, chisel (of stone and bone).
Gravette, etching tool.
Pic, pick (triangular or quadrangular, for sculpture).

Page 376

Ceremonial.
Bâton de commandement, ceremonial staff (first appearance).

New Industrial Implements.
Grattoir, planing tool [AP]long but not thick.
Aiguille, needle (bone, first appearance).

New Implements of War and Chase.
Lance and spear head types, of stone:
(a) Pointe à cran, shouldered point.
(b) Pointe à soie, tongued point (Font Robert type).
(c) Pointe de laurier(?), laurel-leaf point(?).
Couteau, knife, blade (bone, first appearance).
The early and middle Aurignacian 'point' and the 'grattoir,' sharpened all
around, as well as the incurved flake become less frequent. The grattoirs, or
planing tools, are somewhat higher and narrower than those of the early
Aurignacian but not very different in form; two forms of grattoir are
recognized, one long and not very thick, the other high and keel-shaped
(grattoir caréné).
Among the perçoirs a curved form is very characteristic, and we also note a
variety of small knives, or couteaux.
The inventive genius of this people is displayed in the rapidly increasing
variety of flint implements designed for fishing or for the chase. Toward the
end of the Upper Aurignacian there appears the shouldered spear head
(pointe à cran), and also a lance form of which the most perfect types have
been found at Willendorf, in Austria, and at Grimaldi, on the Riviera. More
or less sporadically there appear specimens of the tongued spear heads
(pointes à soie), such as are found at Spy, Font Robert, and Laussel. This
type of flint is constantly found associated with rudely formed prototypes of
the Solutrean laurel-leaf point.

Page 377

Fig. 151. Implements of
industrial use, of the
chase, and of fishing;
also suitable for fine
engraving and etching on
stone or bone. Evolution
of the Aurignacian pointe
with abrupt retouch
along one edge, from the
base to the summit of the
Aurignacian. After
Breuil. About one-third
actual size. 1-4.
Primitive curved points
from the Abri Audit,
Dordogne. 5. More
evolved curved point
from Gargas. 6, 7. Points
from Chatelperron, at the
base of the middle
Aurignacian. 11-28.
Microlithic points from
La Gravette and Font

Page 378

Robert. The form of 28
suggests that of the
pointe à cran or
'shouldered point'
characteristic of the late
Solutrean.

Decorative art has now become a passion, and graving-tools of great variety
of shape, curved, straight, convex, or concave, diversified both in size and
in style of technique, are very numerous. We may imagine that the long
periods of cold and inclement weather were employed in these occupations.
The use of the reindeer horn is developing, and the decoration of the bone
with very fine lines drawn by the microlithic tools is at times very
remarkable. Here appear the earliest examples of the so-called bâton de
commandement, which is supposed to have served as a ceremonial staff or
wand; it is made of the reindeer antler with a great hole bored at the point
where the brow tine unites with the main beam; some of these bâtons are
ornamented with rude engravings, but not as yet with sculpture.

Page 379

Fig. 152. Prototypes of the
Solutrean laurel-leaf
point, probably an
implement of war or the
chase. After Breuil.
Large symmetrical flakes
chipped over the entire
surface. 1, 2. Late
Aurignacian types from
Font Robert. 3, 4, 5.
Points from the Proto-
Solutrean layer of the
Grotte du Trilobite.

Strong and very sharp graving-tools were also needed for the sculpture out
of ivory and soapstone of such human figures and figurines as the statuettes
found in the Grottes de Grimaldi and at Willendorf and still more powerful
tools for such work as the large stone bas-reliefs of Laussel. At this time the
Crô-Magnons were also fashioning stronger tools for the engraving of

Page 380

animals in stone, for shallow forms of bas-relief on the walls of the caves,
and for other animal outlines. The most evolved animal figures of this
period arouse the thought of Magdalenian art in its beginnings.
As this industrial evolution widens it is apparent that we witness not the
local evolution of a single people but rather the influence and collaboration
of numerous colonies reacting more or less one upon the other and
spreading their inventions and discoveries. These people were essentially
nomadic and no doubt carried the latest types of implements from point to
point or bartered them in trade. Thus there is not only a definite succession
in such places as Dordogne, but in more remote regions the form of the
implements may take on some important differences.(33) There are also
other localities where the industry seems for a while to be suspended; thus
in the Cantabrian Mountains of Spain we find only the early and the late
Aurignacian.
Stations similar in culture to those of Dordogne extend northward into
Germany and Belgium and eastward into Austria and Poland. Thus the
characteristic flint spear heads, known as the pointe à soie and pointe à
cran extend from Laussel along the Vézère to Willendorf, in Austria; and
the female figures of Baoussé-Roussé (Grimaldi) and of Willendorf
represent the same stage of evolution as the large stone bas-relief of
Laussel. Again, we observe some relations between the Aurignacian
cultures of Austria and of the Italian peninsula, such as the pointe à cran,
derived from the gravette and found both in various stations of northern
Italy and at Willendorf. In western Russia the Aurignacian station of
Mezine, Chernigov, shows clearly the types of the superior Aurignacian in
the graving of bone and ivory, in the small bâtons recalling those of Spy, in
Belgium, and of Brassempouy, in southwestern France, in the large bone
piercers perforated at the head, suggesting the primitive needles from the
shelter of Blanchard, and in the degenerate statuettes resembling the type of
Brassempouy.

Distribution of the Aurignacian Industry
When the general geographic distribution of the Aurignacian (Fig. 153) is
compared with that of the Mousterian (Fig. 125) it is surprising to find how

Page 381

many of the stations are identical; it would appear as if the Crô-Magnons
had driven the Neanderthals from their principal stations over all of western
Europe for the pursuit of their own industries and of the chase. We have
already spoken of the invasion of the Mousterian stations along the Riviera,
in the Pyrenees, in the Cantabrian Alps, and along the Dordogne and the
Somme; this occupation also extends along the Meuse, the Rhine, and the
Danube; but, whereas there are only six stations in all Germany of
unquestioned Mousterian age, there are more than double that number in
Aurignacian times. The Crô-Magnons entered the grottos of Sirgenstein and
Räuberhöhle, near the headwaters of the Danube; northwest of Sirgenstein
they established the open 'loess' station of Achenheim, west of Strasburg; in
the lower layers of the 'newer loess' was also the station of Völklinshofen,
south of Achenheim; along the middle Rhine were the 'loess' stations of
Rhens and Metternich, and to the far north, close to the borders of the
Scandinavian glacier, was the somewhat doubtful Aurignacian station of
Thiede. The Crô-Magnon men entered the Sirgenstein grotto and scattered
the implements of their culture above the 'lower rodent layer,' composed of
the Obi lemming, and also left remains of the woolly rhinoceros, the woolly
mammoth, the stag, and the reindeer on the floor of the cavern. The Upper
Aurignacian also extends down the Danube as far as Willendorf, and
possibly to Brünn, Moravia, which last, however, may be of Solutrean age.
Altogether between seventeen and twenty Aurignacian stations have been
discovered in the region north of the Danube and along the Rhine.

Page 382

Larger Image

Fig. 153. Geographic
distribution of the
principal Aurignacian
industrial stations in
western Europe.

Page 383

Fig. 154. Outlook over the
Bay of Biscay from the
entrance of the cavern of
Pindal, in the province of
Asturias, northern Spain.
Photograph by N. C.
Nelson.

Aurignacian Art[AQ]
The strongest proof of the unity of heredity as displayed in the dominant
Crô-Magnon race in Europe from early Aurignacian until the close of
Magdalenian times is the unity of their art impulse. This indicates a unity of
mind and of spirit. It is something which could not pass to them from
another race, like an industrial invention, but was inborn and creative.

Page 384

These people were the Palæolithic Greeks; artistic observation and
representation and a true sense of proportion and of beauty were instinct
with them from the beginning. Their stone and bone industry may show
vicissitudes and the influence of invasion and of trade and the bringing in of
new inventions, but their art shows a continuous evolution and development
from first to last, animated by a single motive, namely, the appreciation of
the beauty of form and the realistic representation of it.

Fig. 155. Outline of a
mammoth painted in red
ochre in the cavern of
Pindal, and attributed by
Breuil to the
Aurignacian. Only two
limbs are represented.
After Breuil.

Page 385

This art, as first discovered by Lartet and further made known through the
brilliant studies of Piette and Breuil, is industrial (l'art mobilier), consisting
of the decoration of small personal belongings, ornaments, and implements
of stone, bone, and ivory. According to the later researches of Sautuola,
Rivière, Cartailhac, Capitan, and Breuil it is also mural or parietal (l'art
pariétal), consisting of drawings, engravings, paintings, and bas-reliefs on
the walls of caverns and grottos. It remained for Breuil especially to
demonstrate that the mobile and the parietal art are identical, the work of
the same artistic race, developing along closely similar lines, step by step.
Thus the art becomes a new means not only of interpreting the psychology
of the race but of establishing the prehistoric chronology.

Dating of the Art
One of the first questions which rises in our mind is this—how is this art
dated; how can these steps be positively determined?
The age of these engraved or painted designs on the walls of the caverns is
determined in a number of ways described by Breuil.(36) The simplest
method is where the wall designs of one period are covered by the
archæological layers of succeeding periods. This has been observed in four
cases, as at Pair-non-Pair, Gironde, where primitive engravings of horses,
caprids, and bovids are buried under flints characteristic of the late
Aurignacian mingled with bones of the mammoth, rhinoceros, lion, hyæna,
bison, and reindeer. Again, the deeply engraved bison on the wall of the
grotto of La Grèze, Dordogne, is found beneath a talus of Solutrean flints
associated with remains of the bison, reindeer, and rhinoceros. In the Grotte
de la Mairie, Dordogne, are found several finely engraved middle
Magdalenian figures of animals buried beneath late Magdalenian
implements associated with the reindeer fauna.
Very important, indeed, is the age of the sculpture and bas-reliefs found in
Laussel. The human sculptures are determined to be of late Aurignacian
age, because they are buried in an early Solutrean talus. The splendid wall
sculptures of the series of horses in the Cap-Blanc shelter, near the Laussel
shelter, are shown to be of middle Magdalenian age, because of the upper
Magdalenian strata which covered and partly concealed them.

Page 386

Fig. 156. Primitive painted
outlines of animals from
the cavern walls of Font-
de-Gaume, Dordogne,
attributed by Breuil to
the early Aurignacian.
The outlines represent
the horse, ibex, cave-
bear, wild cattle, and
reindeer. After Breuil.

Page 387

In other instances we can date a drawing in a cavern by the period at which
the opening was closed; for example, the cave of La Mouthe, Dordogne,
was closed in by a Magdalenian layer of flints which touched the roof and
firmly sealed up the entrance until recent times. Again, at Gargas, Hautes-
Pyrénées, we know that the last occupation by the Crô-Magnons was near
the end of Aurignacian times, as indicated by a hearth filled with late
Aurignacian flints and with the remains of the bear, hyæna, horse, and
reindeer; the opening of the grotto was buried beneath these foyers, which
obstructed the entrance until the cave was rediscovered at a comparatively
recent date. Also at Marsoulas, Haute-Garonne, there are two hearths, one
late Aurignacian, the other late Magdalenian; the grotto was then closed
until recent times. The grotto of Niaux, on the Ariège, which contains fine
examples of drawings of middle Magdalenian times at a distance of 1,800
feet from the entrance, was protected for a long period by a lake 6 feet deep
and several hundred feet long. At Altamira, near Santander, the superb
frescoed ceiling was buried, long before Neolithic times, by the closing up
of the entrance, which was rediscovered only about thirty years ago.

Fig. 157. The woolly
rhinoceros, painted in
red ochre with shading
and partial representation
of the hair, in the cavern
of Font-de-Gaume,

Page 388

Dordogne. Attributed by
Breuil to the late
Aurignacian. Possibly
Magdalenian. After
Breuil.

A third method of dating the art is still more significant; it is through a
similarity in the engravings on bone, found in the old hearths associated
with flints, to the mural decorations which are found upon the walls. Thus,
at Altamira, engravings on bone associated with Solutrean and Magdalenian
flints enabled Alcalde del Rio and Breuil to date the engravings on the
limestone walls. Hence, in grottos which have never been closed up and
which have been frequented at different times from the Palæolithic to the
present epoch one observes that the mural designs in the caverns are
invariably accompanied by Upper Palæolithic implements with a similar
style of decoration; and this is the case at Font-de-Gaume, Combarelles,
Portel, Mas d'Azil, Castillo, Pasiega, and Hornos de la Peña. The bone
engravings of the female red deer found at Altamira are identical in their
artistic period with those found on the walls of the same grotto. The
excavations at Castillo, where numerous shoulder-blades of the deer were
found engraved in the same style as those of Altamira, prove that all these
engravings and drawings are to be referred to ancient Magdalenian rather
than to upper Solutrean times. The engravings upon the walls in the grotto
of Hornos de la Peña, of Aurignacian times, are dated through the discovery
at the base of the layer of Aurignacian flints of an engraved equine figure
similar to the engravings at Altamira.
A fourth method applies to those not infrequent cases when two or three
designs are superposed one upon the other, from which it necessarily
follows that the underlying designs must antedate those above.
Through the application of these four methods Breuil has succeeded in
dating all the steps in the advance of art from Aurignacian into Magdalenian
times.

Page 389

Engraving, Painting, and Sculpture
In the archaic drawings of the caverns of Pair-non-Pair, La Grèze, and La
Mouthe most of the animal figures are somewhat heavily and deeply
engraved; the proportions are not true; the head is usually too small, with a
large, short body which is often lightly modelled, resting on thin
extremities. Quadrupeds are frequently represented with but two legs, as in
the case of the mammoth. That the powers of observation were only
gradually trained is shown by the fact that details which in later drawings
are well observed are here overlooked; the profile drawings of animals,
with one fore leg and one hind leg represented, are quite like those of
children.
Progress toward a true representation of animal form in drawing begins
very early; even in middle Aurignacian times primitive drawing and
engraving commences to replace sculpture. Both the flint 'burins' and the
engravings on the walls of the grottos show that the beginnings of drawing
may be traced back to early Aurignacian times. While the Palæolithic artists
early in the Aurignacian had obtained a certain facility in plastic work, their
drawings, which are solely contours—somewhat imperfect and deeply
engraved lines—show a gradual development. The degree of skill attained
in late Aurignacian times we know from the engraving of a horse on a stone
fragment from Gargas, and from a sketch of the hinder quarter of a horse
found in the cave of Hornos de la Peña, which is engraved on the frontal
bone of one of the wild horses; the latter is strikingly similar to one of the
engravings found at the entrance to the same grotto. The engravings on a
slab of slate of the heads of two woolly rhinoceroses(37) (Fig. 161) probably
belong to the late Aurignacian. Similar attempts are found in the Abri
Lacoste. Ornamentation develops in the middle Aurignacian, but retains a
simple geometric character.

Page 390

Fig. 158. Female figurine
carved in crystalline talc,
discovered at the Grottes
de Grimaldi, near
Mentone. This figurine,
possibly modelled after
one of the Grimaldi
negroids, represents the
enceinte condition
common to many of
these figures. It is
peculiar in showing that
abnormal development
behind the hips known as

Page 391

steatopygy. After
Reinach.

The parietal art on the walls of the caverns, mostly deep engravings,
consists of stiff profiles in single lines and in red or black coloring. The
animals represented are the ibex, the horse, the bison, and rarely the
mammoth. The caves where these are found are Pair-non-Pair, La Grèze, La
Mouthe, Bernifal, Font-de-Gaume, Altamira, and Marsoulas. Crucibles for
grinding the color are found in the grotto of Marsoulas, the color being
made by grinding up the red and yellow oxides of iron.
The development of art during the whole Aurignacian is continuous and is
undoubtedly the work of one race; Breuil considers it the work certainly
either of the tall Crô-Magnons or of the small Grimaldis; there is, however,
no evidence of the survival of the Grimaldi race, and we may safely
attribute this entire art development to the Crô-Magnons.
The creative spirit manifested itself along many different lines. In the
fashioning of bone in early Aurignacian times there begins a new industry
capable of great possibilities; out of combinations of lines there develop
geometric figures; in animal figures there is an attempt at simple symmetric
relations, but a full, free composition is not attained. With further
experience in working with bone and ivory, we find in the middle
Aurignacian the first plastic representations of the human figure in the
round.

Page 392

Fig. 159. Statuette in
limestone from the grotto
of Willendorf, Lower
Austria, attributed to the
late Aurignacian. This
female figurine, possibly
an idol and generally
known as the 'Venus of
Willendorf,' is about four
and one-half inches in
height. After Szombathi.

Page 393

The Crô-Magnon artist undertook this plastic work, choosing chiefly for his
subject the female figure. These small plastic models were probably
designed as idols; the figures are often misshapen; in the face the eyes
frequently are not indicated at all; in some cases the ear is indicated; they
recall the style of the modern cubists. More care is given to the sculpture of
the form of the body than of the face. The ivory statue known as the Venus
of Brassempouy lies at the base of the middle Aurignacian; of the same
epoch are the female statuettes of Sireuil, and the torso from Pair-non-Pair,
whereas the soapstone figurine of Mentone and the ivory statuettes of Trou
Magrite, Belgium, belong to the late Aurignacian. The spread of these idols,
which are altogether characteristic of the earlier period of the Upper
Palæolithic, is traced eastward to Willendorf, Austria, and to Brünn,
Moravia.
Breuil's great contention is a certain similarity to north African art, which
would seem to agree with his theory that the Crô-Magnon people followed
the southern shores of the Mediterranean, bringing with them the
Aurignacian industry and the glyptic art of the female statuettes similar to
those of baked clay which are found along the valley of the Nile. These
figurines have in common the great development of all the parts connected
with maternity, and in some cases a coiffure or head-dress very much like
that found in the most primitive Egyptian work. The extreme corpulence of
all the figurines has been compared with the 'steatopygy,' or development of
what are politely known as the 'posterior curves,' of the female in many
African races. But only one of these Aurignacian figurines is truly
'steatopygous'; the others are simply corpulent, a condition due to eating
large quantities of fat and marrow, and probably to a very sedentary life. It
is noteworthy that none of the male figures in drawing and sculpture is
corpulent. While the art of the statuettes appears to come to a close in late
Aurignacian times, it may extend into the Solutrean at Brünn, Moravia, and
at Trou Magrite, Belgium. With due regard for analogies, it would rather
appear probable that this archaic sculpture was autochthonous.

Page 394

Fig. 160. Female figurine in
soapstone, discovered at
the Grottes de Grimaldi,
near Mentone, and
attributed to the late
Aurignacian. After
Obermaier. This seems to
be a prototype of modern
cubist art.

The art of engraving and drawing was almost certainly autochthonous,
because we trace it from its most rudimentary beginnings. This northern art
developed from the beginning of Upper Palæolithic times over the whole of

Page 395

southwestern France and in the northwest of Spain, being contemporaneous
with the descent of the alpine fauna from the Pyrenees and the Alps and the
presence all over western Europe of the tundra fauna. It was, by preference,
an animal art, begun by the Aurignacians but largely suspended in Solutrean
times.

Fig. 161. Superposed
engravings of various
mammals on a slab of
slate found in the Grotte
du Trilobite, Yonne,
France. In detail are seen
the profiles of two
woolly rhinoceroses
superposed on the rump

Page 396

of a mammoth with tail
upturned. After Breuil.

Painting(38) also had its birth in the Aurignacian, in the simple contours of
the hand pressed against a wall surface or outlined with color, accompanied
by primitive attempts at linear drawing in color and painted groupings; for
example, the crude outlines of the bison in the grotto of Castillo are of
Aurignacian age, also the black linear designs of the deer and of the ibex in
the cavern of Font-de-Gaume, Dordogne, the striking red linear design of
the mammoth in the grotto of Pindal, in northern Spain, representing the
animal as with two limbs, and the red outlines of wild cattle in Castillo.
Breuil also attributes to Aurignacian times the spirited figure of the woolly
rhinoceros in red ochre in the cave of Font-de-Gaume, as well as the outline
of the stag in red color.

Page 397

Fig. 162. Silhouettes of
complete and of partly
mutilated hands from the
walls of the grotto of
Gargas in the Pyrenees.
After Breuil.

We are impressed throughout with three qualities in this Aurignacian
design: first, the very close observation of the animal form; second, the
attempt at realistic effect produced with very few lines; third, the element of
motion or movement in these animals. For example, the two heads of the
woolly rhinoceros in the slab engravings of the Trilobite grotto (Fig. 161)
are remarkably correct in proportion; there is an attempt with fine lines to
indicate the wool hanging along the lower surface of the head; behind these

Page 398

two figures is the rump of an elephant with the tail upturned, an adaptation
of the artist to the form of the slate fragment; the outlines of the feet both of
the rhinoceros and the mammoth are remarkably accurate representations of
these pachyderms.
In the more advanced development of draftsmanship in late Aurignacian
times the engravings of these animals not merely approach the truth, but
characteristic features are strikingly represented; and with a few sure lines
the proportions of the body as a whole are better preserved, while the
complicated curves of the hoofs and of the head show very close
observation.

Fig. 163. The long,
overhanging cliff of
Laussel on the Beune is a
typical rock shelter, first

Page 399

sought in Acheulean
times, and also visited
during the Mousterian,
Aurignacian, and
Solutrean stages.
Photograph by N. C.
Nelson.

Fig. 164. Section of the rock
shelter of Laussel,
showing the superposed
industrial layers from
Acheulean to Solutrean
times. After Lalanne.

In the grotto of La Grèze overhanging the Beune, a small tributary of the
Vézère, was found an archaic Aurignacian outline of the bison deeply
incised on the limestone walls. The grotto of Gargas,[AR] Hautes-Pyrénées,
(39) is one of the most famous stations; it was entered in closing Mousterian
times and was occupied at intervals during the Aurignacian stage. Beneath
the Mousterian layer is a deep deposit of entire skeletons of the cave-bear
without any traces of human industry. These layers lie beyond the grotto in

Page 400

the vast foyer which opens above into a great chimney, so that this is one of
the true cavern habitations. The drawings along the walls of the cave
include a large number of figures in a very unequal style, which belong
chiefly to middle and upper Aurignacian times. Among these are two
figures of birds, several mammals, a few primitive drawings of wild cattle,
the bison, the ibex, and numerous representations of the horse. A long
serpentine band of color meanders among some of these drawings. Most
interesting are the silhouettes of the hand in black and red produced by
pressing the hand against the limestone wall and covering the surrounding
surface with color. It would appear that the fingers were mutilated or cut off
at the middle joint, because one, two, three, and four of the fingers are
wanting, but the thumb is never mutilated. This mutilation of the hand may
be compared with similar practices prevailing among some Australian
tribes.
In the cavern of Marsoulas, on the headwaters of the Garonne, the
conditions are altogether different; the parietal art here represents two
cultural stages, the late Aurignacian and the late Magdalenian. There is a
small entrance grotto with two hearths, corresponding to these two
industries. The entrance to the cave is well up on the side of the hill, and the
drawings which belong with the upper Aurignacian culture are somewhat
damaged. Again, we find designs extending along the wall below the
drawings. There are numerous outlines of the bison in black, the entire side
of the body being covered with splashes of red.

Page 401

Fig. 165. Bas-relief of a
woman with a drinking
horn, sculptured on the
face of a boulder within
the shelter of Laussel,
and attributed to the late
Aurignacian. After
Lalanne. About one-
eighth actual size.

The great abri of Laussel, on the Beune, was first visited by the
Neanderthals, for there are two Mousterian layers and above them two
Aurignacian layers, the lower belonging to the middle Aurignacian industry

Page 402

and the upper to the closing Aurignacian period. This long, overhanging
cliff of Laussel is a typical shelter, first sought in Acheulean times, revisited
in Mousterian times, then again in middle or late Aurignacian, in Solutrean,
and finally in Magdalenian times. As these successive layers rise they
approach the shelter of the cliff, so that the Magdalenian flint workers were
directly beneath the overhanging rock shelter, which opened outward
toward the sun.

Fig. 166. Bas-relief of a spear
thrower or hunter,
sculptured on the face of
a boulder within the
shelter of Laussel. After

Page 403

Lalanne. About one-sixth
actual size.

In the upper Aurignacian layer Lalanne discovered two bas-reliefs
representing the figures of a man and of a woman. The bas-relief of the
woman represents a nude figure holding the horn of a bison in the right
hand; this is cut from a block of limestone with a relief of about two
centimetres, and it measures forty-six centimetres in height; with the
exception of the head, the entire body is polished, and at certain points there
remain traces of red coloring. A little farther on the artist had modelled the
figure of a man in three-quarter view in the attitude of casting a spear or of
an archer drawing the bow; the top of the head and the extremities of the
limbs have been broken away; the figure measures forty centimetres in
height. These bas-reliefs of Laussel are regarded as sincere representations,
for the artist has presented as accurately as possible the contemporary
human figure; both the man and the woman are represented in motion. On
the technique employed in this primordial sculpture, Doctor Lalanne
observes that we find at Laussel a series of tools perfectly adapted to attain
this result, many of which would have been inexplicable unless found to
occur in connection with the sculpture itself. It is curious to note how many
analogies there are between the flint utensils of the primitive sculptor and
those of the sculptors of our own day. First, we find tools designed to
remove the rock, there are points, pickaxes, chopping tools for shaping the
rock, saws, and coarse stone planers; all of these are perfectly adapted to the
hand, from which we may conclude that our artist was right-handed. There
is a great number of graving-tools, or burins, all forms being represented—
plain, double, fine, coarse, and combinations of the burin and grattoir. Some
of the burins show the sharp-angled point centred at the extremity of a
blade; these are the ordinary types; but in many the blade ends with a
terminal retouch, which may be transverse, oblique, concave, or convex
with the point to one side. The grattoirs, or planers, are equally numerous,
with examples of all the known forms. Many of these are formed at the end
of a blade; a few are circular, and others are at the opposite end of a pointed
blade; the latter are particularly fine and are retouched around the entire
edge. But the artist did not merely carve his subjects; he also coated them
with a paint made of ochre and manganese; he crushed his coloring matter

Page 404

on a palette of schist, and we have found one of these unbroken and still
bearing the red and ochre colors. This palette is 10½ inches long and 6
inches wide; it is oblong in form.

Distribution of the Solutrean Industry
The period of the Solutrean industry is one of the most difficult to interpret
in the whole prehistory of western Europe. The remains of this industry in
several localities lie directly between those of the Aurignacian and the
Magdalenian; in others, as at Solutré, they directly follow the Aurignacian.
There is no doubt that this represents a very long and a very important
epoch in Upper Palæolithic development. From the cultural standpoint it
represents a climax in the flint industry, but a period of suspension or of
arrested development in art.
A glance at the maps of the Mousterian (Fig. 125), the Aurignacian (Fig.
153), and the Solutrean (Fig. 167) culture stations shows that the
geographic distribution of the Solutrean is entirely unique; whereas the
Aurignacian culture may be said to girdle the Mediterranean, both on its
southern and northern coasts, the Solutrean culture is absent in this entire
region. The interpretation of this strange phenomenon offered by Breuil,
that the Solutrean culture entered Europe directly from the east and not
from the south, may be connected with the theory that toward the end of
Aurignacian times a new race from the central east was working westward
through Hungary and along the Danube—a race of inferior mental type, but
extremely expert in fashioning the flint spears and lances with what is
known as the Solutrean 'retouch.' This may be the race of Brünn, Brüx, and
Předmost, the remains of which are found in two localities associated with
these highly perfected flint spear heads. Either by the invasion of this race
or, more probably, by the invasion of the highly perfected spear-head
industry itself, the type station of Solutré, on the Saône, was established and
the region of Dordogne reached, where this industry progressed at twelve
different stations.

Page 405

Larger Image

Fig. 167. Geographic
distribution of the
principal Solutrean
industrial stations in
western Europe.

There is no doubt whatever that the new and entirely distinct Brünn race
penetrated the Danubian region at this time, but there is no evidence from
skeletal remains that it reached France. It is quite possible that some of the
flint workers adept in the Solutrean 'retouch' migrated into the far western
stations of Dordogne, bringing with them their beautiful technique, but
without leaving traces of their skeletal remains through ceremonial burial.
This unsettled problem affords one of the many reasons why the anatomy of
all the Upper Palæolithic men of western Europe should be most carefully
studied and compared.

Page 406

Another mystery of Solutrean times is the arrest of the artistic impulse
which had animated the Crô-Magnons throughout the entire Aurignacian.
Evidences of artistic work in Solutrean times are very rare, and some
drawings which have been attributed to the Solutrean, as at Altamira, have
now been referred to the Magdalenian. Is it possible that the Crô-Magnon
race for a time suspended its artistic endeavor only to renew it under the
different conditions of environment of Magdalenian times? Unfortunately,
the Solutrean burials afford very little evidence on this point. One
interpretation which may be offered is that the Solutrean was evidently a
period of open-air life, and that the new implements of the chase of
Solutrean type absorbed the industrial energies of these people, for the
weapons were fashioned in enormous numbers. Consistent with this theory
of climatic influence is the fact that the return of the severe climate of
Magdalenian times, which crowded the men again into the shelters and
grottos, was accompanied by a renewal of the artistic development
continuing from the point where it had been interrupted in closing
Aurignacian times. That Aurignacian and Magdalenian art is the work of
one race there can be no question whatever; that this race was the Crô-
Magnon is now absolutely demonstrated.
The climate of Solutrean times is generally believed to have been cold and
dry. In the region of Dordogne throughout this period the reindeer was still
far more numerous than any other animal; so we may safely conclude that
this was the principal object of the chase and of food; in fact, it would
appear that the reindeer were resident forms in the valley of the Vézère,
hunted and consumed throughout the year.(40) Here we also occasionally
find the northern steppe or Obi lemming, an animal which at the same time
extends along the borders of the Volga River toward southern Russia. It
would appear that in Solutrean times in southwestern France there prevailed
a dry, cold continental subarctic climate like that of the Caspian, Volga, and
Ural steppes of the present day. With the mammoth and the reindeer occur a
great variety of northern European forest forms—the true fox, the hare, the
stag, the brown bear, the wolf, the bison, and the urus. Most interesting is
the identification of the jackal belonging to the ancient species C.
neschersensis. In the type industrial locality of Solutré the reindeer is very
abundant in the fire-hearths associated with the lower Solutrean industry,

Page 407

but less abundant in the upper levels; an antelope, perhaps the saiga
antelope, is said to be found among the crude engravings on bone.

Solutrean Races
There were certainly two distinct races of men in Europe during Solutrean
times, to the east the race of Brünn and to the west the race of Crô-Magnon.
Remains attributed to the Crô-Magnons have been found in the
Departments of Charente, Gironde, Lot, Haute-Garonne, Tarn, and
Dordogne. But most of these remains are very fragmentary and cannot
readily be determined racially. The fragments of ten skulls and a few other
bones found in the Grotte du Placard, Charente, are attributed to late
Solutrean and to early Magdalenian times and constitute one of the most
exceptional discoveries which have thus far been made in France; the
interments probably date from the early Magdalenian (p. 380), but are
probably of a race surviving from the Solutrean. The section of the cave
deposit is from 23 to 26 feet in thickness and is highly instructive; it shows
eight cultural layers, separated by layers of débris and succeeding each
other in the following order:
8. Neolithic layer.
7-4. Magdalenian layers; in the lowest layer is the ceremonial
burial of four skulls.
3. Solutrean layer with shouldered points (pointes à cran) and a
few laurel-leaf points (pointes de laurier).
2. Solutrean layer with laurel-leaf points but no shouldered
points; knives, grattoirs, scrapers, borers, in great numbers,
together with javelin points and awls in bone and ornamented
with notches, and fragments of red chalk and black lead found
embedded with the Solutrean points.
1. Mousterian layer.

Race of Brünn, Brüx, Předmost, and (?) Galley Hill

Page 408

In 1871 a skullcap, now in the Royal Museum of Vienna, was discovered in
the course of coal mining at Brüx, Bohemia. In 1891(41) a skeleton,
apparently of the same race, was discovered at Brünn, Moravia, deeply
embedded in loess along with bones of the woolly mammoth and other
great Pleistocene mammals. In 1892 it was described by Makowsky,(42)
who a few years before had excavated from the loess sand in the
neighborhood of Brünn the fragmentary skull now known as Brünn II. Both
these skulls are of a somewhat low racial type, and for a long time they
were regarded as transition forms between the Neanderthals and Homo
sapiens, but in 1906 Schwalbe(43) showed the affinity between the skulls of
Brüx and Brünn and at the same time their entire distinctness from the
Neanderthal skull and their approach to lower forms of Homo sapiens. The
chief distinction of these skulls is their extreme elongation or
dolichocephaly, the ratio of width to length being 69 per cent in the Brüx
skull, and 68.2 per cent in the Brünn skull. The latter ranks lower in racial
type than the Australian negroids. The chief distinction from the
Neanderthal skull is in the index of the height of skull (51.22 per cent) and
in the absence of the prominent ridges extending across the eyebrow region
above the nose;[AS] the forehead, in brief, is more modern, the frontal angle
being 74.7-75 per cent. The brain capacity in this race is estimated,
according to Makowsky,(44) at 1,350 c.cm. Both the Brüx and Brünn skulls
are harmonic; they do not present the very broad, high cheek-bones
characteristic of the Crô-Magnon race, the face being of a narrow, modern
type, but not very long. There is evidence that the neck and shoulders were
powerful and muscular; the prominence of the chin is pronounced; the
dentition is macrodont, that is, the last lower molar is of exceptionally large
size; there was no prognathism or protrusion of the jaws. The second Brünn
skull (Brünn II) may represent a female type of the Brünn race, the cephalic
index being estimated at 72 per cent.

Page 409

Fig. 168. The type skull
known as Brünn I—
supposed male—
discovered at Brünn,
Moravia, in 1891. It was
found deeply imbedded
in loess along with bones
of the woolly mammoth,
woolly rhinoceros, giant
deer, reindeer, and other
Pleistocene mammals,
and is believed to be of
Solutrean age. After

Page 410

Makowsky. One-third
life size.

DISCOVERIES CHIEFLY OF THE CRÔ-MAGNON AND BRÜNN
RACES[AT]
Referred to Solutrean Times
Date of Number of
Locality Culture Stage
Discovery Individuals
Crô-Magnon Race (?)
Grotte du Placard, Fragments of ten Late Solutrean
Charente, France. skulls and
and a few other early
bones. Magdalenian.
Pair-non-Pair, Skull fragments. Solutrean.
Gironde, France.
Lacave, Lot, France. " " "
Montconfort, Haute- " " "
Garonne, France.
Roset, Tarn, France. " " Late Solutrean.
Badegoule, Bones. Solutrean.
Dordogne, France.
Brünn-Brüx-Předmost Race
1880. Předmost, Moravia, Portions of Solutrean.
Austria. twenty skeletons.
1891. Brünn, Moravia, Male skeleton "
Austria. (Brünn I).
(?) Female
skeleton (Brünn
II).
Ballahöhle, Skeleton of (?) "
Miskolcz, Hungary. infant.
(?) Galley Hill. One skeleton. Unknown.

Page 411

There is a possibility(47) that the Brünn race was ancestral to several later
dolichocephalic groups which are found in the region of the Danube and of
middle and southern Germany. Schliz characterizes the Brünn skull as
distinguished by the retreating forehead, by massive eminences above the
orbits separated by a cleft in the median line, by broad, low orbits, and
prominent chin. These characters are met with again in one of the
dolichocephalic skulls found in the interment at Ofnet, at the very close of
Upper Palæolithic times. It would thus appear that the Brünn race is distinct
from the Crô-Magnon race, that it represents a long-headed type which
became established along the Danube as early as Solutrean times, and that it
may possibly be connected with the introduction of some of the peculiar
features of the Solutrean culture.
One of the skeletons of Brünn, found at a depth of 12 feet below the surface
of the 'loess,' was lavishly adorned with tooth-shells, perforated stone discs,
and bone ornaments made from the ribs of the rhinoceros or mammoth and
from the teeth of the mammoth; associated with these was an ivory idol,
apparently of a male figure, of which only the head, the torso, and the left
arm remain. The skeleton and many of the objects found with the sepulture
were partly tinted in red. An ivory figurine belongs to the Eburnéen stage of
Piette and appears to indicate that the burial was of Aurignacian rather than
of Solutrean age.
The Předmost 'mammoth hunters' also probably belonged to this race. They
are represented by the remains of six individuals excavated since 1880 at
Předmost, Moravia, by Wankel, Kr̆ íz̆ , and Mas̆ ka. The bones were found in
a very much shattered condition. Mas̆ ka has since discovered a collective
burial of fourteen human skeletons, with remains of six others; the bodies
were covered with stones, but no flints or objects of art were buried with
them. The dimensions of the limbs indicate a race of large stature. The
skeletons were deeply buried in 'loess,' and above and below the rich
archæological layer were abundant débris of the mammoth, representing
between eight and nine hundred specimens. Along with the numerous flints,
including laurel-leaf spear heads of middle Solutrean type, were found other
objects and even primitive works of art in bone and ivory. There is no
question that the human remains belong to the middle Solutrean stage.(48)

Page 412

With this race is also associated by many authors (Schwalbe, Schliz,
Klaatsch, Keith) the Galley Hill skull, which was found in 1888, buried at a
depth of 8 feet in the 'high terrace' gravels 90 feet above the Thames.(49)
Sollas thinks it highly probable that the remains were in a natural position
and of the same age as the high-level gravels and the Palæolithic flints and
remains of extinct animals which they contained, but Evans and Dawkins
regard the Galley Hill man as belonging to a long-headed Neolithic race
interred in a Palæolithic stratum. The gravels of the 'high terrace' in which
the Galley Hill skull was buried are by no means of the geologic antiquity
of 200,000 years assigned to them by Keith;(50) they are probably of Fourth
Glacial or of Postglacial age, and lie within the estimates of Postglacial
time, namely, from 20,000 to 40,000 years.
The antiquity of the Galley Hill cranial type has been maintained with
ability by Keith. The skull is extremely long or hyperdolichocephalic, the
cephalic index being estimated by Keith at 69 per cent;(51) the brain
capacity is estimated at between 1,350 c.cm. and 1,400 c.cm.; the cheek-
bones are not preserved, so that no judgment can be formed as to this most
distinctive character of the Crô-Magnon race. With this Galley Hill race
Keith also compares the Combe-Capelle, or Aurignacian man of Klaatsch,
(52) although he mistakenly considers the Combe-Capelle man of much less
geologic antiquity. He continues: "Thus, while the writer is inclined to agree
in provisionally assigning the Combe-Capelle man to the Galley Hill race,
he believes that further discoveries will show that the Combe-Capelle man
belongs to a branch marked with certain negroid features."

Solutrean Flint Industry
The 'Solutrean retouch' marks one of the most notable advances in the
technique of flint working; it is altogether distinct from the 'Aurignacian
retouch,' which is an heritage from the Mousterian.(53) The flint is chipped
off by pressure in fine, thin flakes from the entire surface of the implement,
to which in its perfected form the craftsman can give a thin, sharp edge and
perfect symmetry. This is a great advance on the abrupt Aurignacian
retouch, in which the flint is chipped back at a rather blunt angle to make a

Page 413

sharp edge. According to de Mortillet, the Solutrean method of pressure
made possible the execution of much more delicate work.

Page 414

Larger Image

Fig. 169. Typical Solutrean
implements of war and
chase. After de Mortillet.
Pointes en feuille de
laurier, or laurel-leaf
points, artistically
retouched on both
surfaces, at both ends,
and on both borders;
regarded by de Mortillet
rather as blades of
poniards than as javelin
heads. 120. Lozenge-

Page 415

shaped form from the
type station of Solutré,
Saône-et-Loire. 121.
Elongate form found at
Solutré. 122. The largest
pointe discovered at
Solutré. 123. One of the
smallest points found at
Solutré. 124. Solutrean
point from Laugerie
Haute, Dordogne. 127.
Point from Gargas,
Vaucluse. 128. Point of
exceptionally fine
workmanship. 130. One
of eleven very large
Solutrean laurel-leaf
points found in a cache
at Volgu; probably a
votive offering, as the
flints are too slender to
be of any use and one at
least shows traces of
coloring. All the flints
are shown one-quarter
actual size, except 129,
which is one-half actual
size.

The question at once arises, did this industrial advance take place in France
or was it an invention brought from the east? On this point Breuil
observes(54) that in the highest Aurignacian levels in Belgium, in Dordogne,
and at Solutré the Solutrean technique becomes faintly apparent either in
the 'stem' points (pointes à soie) of Font Robert, La Ferrassie, and Spy or in
the double-edged points tending toward the laurel-leaf type of the
Solutrean, but that all the other implements remain purely Aurignacian.

Page 416

Relations and Subdivisions of Solutrean Culture
Lower (Early) Magdalenian.
Prototypes of bone harpoons.
Beginnings of animal sculpture.
Absence of any trace of the laurel-leaf spear heads of Solutrean
times.

Upper (Late) Solutrean.
Typical shouldered points (pointes à cran)—elongate flakes worked
on one
or both sides and notched. Small laurel-leaf spear heads.
Bone javelin points, awls, and needles, very finely worked. Placard.
Lacave.

Middle (High) Solutrean.
Large 'laurel-leaf' spear heads worked on both sides. Climax of
Solutrean
flint industry. Placard.

Lower (Proto-) Solutrean.
Primitive 'laurel-leaf' and 'willow-leaf' spear heads, most of them
worked
on only one side. Grotte du Trilobite.

Transition from Aurignacian.
Pedunculate spear heads (pointes à soie) of primitive Font Robert
type.
Climax of human sculpture.
As to the chief source of Solutrean influence, the same author remarks that,
since this culture is entirely wanting in central and southern Spain, in Italy,
in Sicily, in Algeria, and in Phœnicia, we should certainly not look to the
Mediterranean for its origin but rather to eastern Europe; for in the grottos
of Hungary we find a great development of the true Solutrean, while so far
the Aurignacian has not been found here, although we do find traces of the

Page 417

earlier transitional stages below the levels of the true laurel-leaf points. We
must admit, therefore, that in all probability the Solutrean culture reached
Europe from the east and that its source is as mysterious as that of the
Aurignacian, which, as we have seen, was of southern and probably of
Mediterranean origin. It is not impossible that the evolution of the laurel-
leaf point took place in Hungary, for it was certainly not evolved in central
or western Europe.
At Předmost, in Moravia, we observe an advanced Aurignacian industry
which had adopted a Solutrean fashion in its spear heads. Here the laurel-
leaf implements are few, while the implements of bone are abundant; but in
the Solutrean stations of Hungary there are no bone implements. As the
Solutrean technique comes to perfection the laurel-leaf spear head, so
characteristic of the full Solutrean industry, is created and is met with in
Poland, in Hungary, in Bavaria, and then in France, where the industry
extends southward to the west and east of the central plateau. In France it
appears quite suddenly in the Grotte du Trilobite (Yonne), and also in
Dordogne and Ardèche, where the Proto-Solutrean types show marked
impoverishment, both in the variety and in the execution of most of the flint
implements, the only exception being the flattened spear heads, pointes à
face plane, which show a regular Solutrean retouch, beautiful but
monotonous. Laurel-leaf points discovered at Crouzade, Gourdan, and
Montfort denote the presence of the true Solutrean culture, but this culture
does not approach the stations in the neighborhood of Brassempouy.
Toward the north the grotto of Spy, in Belgium, affords examples of Proto-
Solutrean types, which have also been traced in several British caverns, but
it is not certain that true Solutrean implements are found in Britain.
In Picard a Proto-Solutrean layer has been found, but no laurel-leaf points.
In the type station of Solutré in southeastern France Breuil discovered two
Solutrean layers, quite different from each other: one rich in bone
implements and graving-tools, with small flint laurel leaves retouched on
only one face; the other poor in bone implements but with large laurel-leaf
spear heads.
The Solutrean culture never penetrated to the south of the great barrier of
the Pyrenees, but, passing through the Vézère valley, in Dordogne, it spread
along the western coast to the northern slopes of the Cantabrian Mountains

Page 418

into the province of Santander, Spain. Here the laurel-leaf points of the
middle Solutrean are found at Castillo, while the shouldered points, pointes
à cran, typical of the later Solutrean, are found at Altamira, together with
bone implements. None the less, it should be noticed that in the southwest
of Europe the earlier phases of the Solutrean are characterized by a decrease
in the use of bone, which, however, increases again in the upper levels.

Fig. 170. The type station of
Solutrean culture, near
the present village of
Solutré, in south central
France, sheltered on the
north by a steep rocky
ridge and with a fine
sunny exposure toward
the south.

Page 419

The type station of the Solutrean culture is the great open-air camp of
Solutré, near the Saône, sheltered on the north by a steep ridge and with a
fine, sunny exposure toward the south. The traces of this great camp, which
is the largest thus far discovered in western Europe, cover an area 300 feet
square and are situated within a short distance of a good spring of water. As
explored, in 1866, by Arcelin,(55) Ferry, and Ducrost, this station had
already been occupied in Aurignacian times; and two sections, taken at two
different points, showed the deposits of the old camp to be from 22 to 26
feet in thickness, representing superposed Aurignacian and Solutrean fire-
hearths with thick layers of intermediate débris. In the Aurignacian level is
found the vast accumulation of the bones of horses already described. In the
middle Solutrean levels great fireplaces are found with flint utensils and the
remains of abundant feasts among the charred débris. The fauna includes
the wolf, the fox, the hyæna, both the cave and the brown bear, the badger,
the rabbit, the stag, wild cattle, and two characteristic northern forms—the
woolly mammoth and the reindeer; the remains of the last are the most
abundant in the ancient hearths.

Page 420

Fig. 171. Centre of the great
open camp of Solutré,
covering an area 300 feet
square, with the village
of Solutré in the
distance. First occupied
in Aurignacian times,
and a favorite and
densely inhabited camp
throughout the
Aurignacian and
Solutrean stages. In
Aurignacian times the
remains of thousands of
horses were accumulated
around this station.

Page 421

In all the Solutrean stations, beside the bone implements,(56) we find two
distinct classes of flints. The first belongs to the entire 'Reindeer Epoch' and
consists of single and double scrapers, drills, burins, retouched flakes, and
plain ones of small dimensions.
The second is composed of the 'leaf' types, which are solely characteristic
of the Solutrean and which degenerate and entirely disappear at its close;
these latter are the arrow and lance head forms, many of which are
fashioned with a rare degree of perfection and exhibit the beautiful broad
Solutrean retouch across the entire surface of both sides of the flake,
together with perfect symmetry, both lateral and bilateral; they are
commonly known as the willow-leaf (narrow) and the laurel-leaf (broad)
forms. The explorers of the type station of Solutré have discovered five
principal shapes, as follows: (1) irregular lozenge; (2) oval, pointed at both
ends; (3) oval, pointed at one end; (4) regular lozenge; (5) arrow-head form
with peduncle, doubtless for attachment to a shaft. The perfected Solutrean
laurel-leaf spear heads do not reappear in any other Upper Palæolithic
period, but their resemblance to Neolithic flints is very marked.
The 'willow-leaf' spear heads (pointes de saule), chipped on only one side,
characteristic of the early Solutrean, may possibly be contemporary with
the closing Aurignacian culture of Font Robert. At Solutré layers have also
been discovered rich in bone implements and in graving-tools, as well as
small 'laurel-leaf' points worked on only one face. As regards the general
tendencies of the early Solutrean culture in Dordogne, at the Grotte du
Trilobite (Yonne), and in Ardèche, there is a marked decline in the work in
bone and in the variety and workmanship of all the implements, excepting
only that of the primitive flattened spear heads, made of flakes, retouched in
Solutrean fashion, but on one side only. Typical deposits of early Solutrean
culture are found at Trou Magrite, in Belgium, at Font Robert, Corrèze, and
in the third level of the Grotte du Trilobite, Yonne; in the second level we
find flints with the nascent Solutrean retouch.
The distinctive implement of the 'high' or middle Solutrean is the large
'laurel-leaf' point, flaked and chipped on both sides and attaining a
marvellous perfection in technique and symmetry. The finest examples of
these spear heads are the famous pointes de laurier, fourteen in number,
discovered at Volgu, Saône-et-Loire, in 1873: they were found together in a

Page 422

sort of cache and, it would seem probable, were intended as a votive
offering, for one at least was colored red, and all were too fragile and
delicate to be of any use in the chase. They are of unusual size, the smallest
measuring 9 inches, and the largest over 13½. In workmanship they are
equalled only by the marvellous Neolithic specimens of Egypt and
Scandinavia.
At Solutré and other stations implements of bone are also found, although
by no means of such frequent occurrence as in the later divisions of the
Solutrean. While the most easterly Solutrean stations of Hungary exhibit no
bone implements, these are abundant at Předmost, in Moravia, where the
culture altogether is of an advanced Aurignacian type, with the Solutrean
retouch used in the shaping of its flint spear heads. The bone industry
includes a number of awls and smoothers, as well as numerous 'bâtons de
commandement.' On this level at Předmost a few works of art are found
consisting of the representations of four animals sculptured on nodules of
limestone, the subjects apparently being reindeer, and also of one single
engraving on bone.
The chief invention of the late Solutrean is the 'shouldered point' (pointe à
cran), a single notched and very slender dart. These notches are the first
indication of the value of the barb in holding a weapon in the flesh. Here
also is a stem for the attachment of the shaft of the dart. In earlier stages of
the Solutrean one finds flints where the unsymmetrical base of the 'point'
shows a small obtuse tongue or stem. The elongate peduncle at the base of
such spear heads (pointes à soie) is developed into the pointe à cran, or
shouldered point, made of long, fine flakes, with a short retouch on one or
both sides, and found in the late Solutrean at the grotto of Lacave, at
Placard, and at many of the stations in Dordogne. No example of the pointe
à cran has ever been found at the type station of Solutré, but it is of
frequent occurrence at the stations between the Loire and the Cantabrian
Pyrenees, being found at Altamira, at Laugerie Haute, at Monthaud (Indre),
in Chalosse and Charente, while the great cave of Placard has yielded no
less than 5,000 specimens, whole and broken.

Page 423

Larger Image

Fig. 172. Typical Solutrean
implements of the chase,
of fishing, and of
industry. After de
Mortillet. 131, 132. A
laurel-leaf point
retouched on both sides.
133-138. Various forms
of the pointe à cran, or
'shouldered point,' a type
distinctive of the late
Solutrean. It has an
elongated peduncle or

Page 424

stem at one side adapted
for the attachment of a
wooden shaft, and was
probably an implement
of the chase, being
suitable for fishing or for
hunting small game. The
examples figured show a
great variety of finish
and retouch. 137 is from
Placard and 138 from the
Grottes de Grimaldi.
139. Poinçon, or awl,
beautifully shaped. 140.
Perçoir, drill or borer.
141. Flake retouched on
one border, recalling the
style of the Aurignacian
points. 142, 143. Finely
retouched points,
suitable for engraving or
etching. All the flints are
shown one-half actual
size.

At Monthaud there are also found bone implements including a number of
poinçons (awls) and a series of sagaies (javelin points). Solutrean sagaies,
however, are very rare and very primitive as compared with the
Magdalenian.
The successive phases of Solutrean industry are all shown in southern
France. As to its stratigraphic relations, the type station of Solutré exhibits
lower and middle Solutrean above Aurignacian hearths and deposits; that of
Placard, Charente, shows the middle and upper Solutrean overlaid by a
Magdalenian layer. In the Grotte du Trilobite the Solutrean layer lies
between one of Aurignacian and one of primitive Magdalenian; it is here

Page 425

that we find the clearest transition from the Aurignacian culture in the
appearance of prototypes of the laurel and willow-leaf points, made of
flakes, retouched on only one side. At Brassempouy the Solutrean lies
immediately beneath a Magdalenian layer, with engraved bones and
Magdalenian flints. Needles, which are particularly abundant in the
Magdalenian epoch, are also found in a number of the Solutrean stations. In
the grotto of Lacave, Lot, in an upper Solutrean layer, Viré has found
beautiful bone needles, pierced at one end and of fine workmanship, and
engraved utensils of reindeer horn; here also was found the head of an
antelope engraved on a fragment of reindeer horn. The local fauna of this
period included the horse, the ibex, and the reindeer.

Solutrean Engraving and Animal Sculpture
The artistic work of Solutrean times is not so rich as that of the
Aurignacian. This, as we have suggested, may be partly attributable to the
less wide-spread distribution of the Solutrean culture, as well as to the great
importance which was attached to the careful fashioning of the stone
weapons. None the less we can trace indications of the development of both
phases of art, the linear and the plastic, and especially the beginnings of
animal sculpture. From the full, round sculpture of Aurignacian times there
follows in Solutrean times a development of carving in bone of the
Rundstabfiguren (bâton, or ceremonial staff), and of high relief. The lion(57)
and the head of a horse at Isturitz, in the Pyrenees, which Breuil attributes
to a late Solutrean period, are typical examples of this work.
Relatively rare are the parietal and mobile engravings as well as the
schematic representations, such as are found at Placard and Champs Blancs.
According to Alcalde del Rio, there are found at Altamira, in northern
Spain, very simple, finely engraved figures of the doe on the bone of the
shoulder-blade; the head and neck are covered with lines, and both the eye
and the nostril as well as the form of the ear are very characteristic of the
animal. Breuil, however, considers these as belonging rather to earlier
Magdalenian times.
Decorative art certainly makes some advances over the Aurignacian work,
because the arrangement of the geometric figures is quite clear, and the

Page 426

execution shows marked progress in the technique of engraving.
At Předmost, near the site of the human burial described above, there has
been discovered a statuette of the mammoth sculptured in the round, in
ivory, which proves that animal sculpture was well advanced in Solutrean
times. The statuette was found six to nine feet beneath the surface of the
'loess,' in an undoubted Solutrean layer. The accompanying fauna is of a
truly arctic character: the mammoth being extraordinarily abundant; the
tundra forms including the mammoth, woolly rhinoceros, musk-ox,
reindeer, arctic fox, arctic hare, glutton, and banded lemming; the Asiatic
forms including the lion and leopard; the forest and meadow fauna
embracing the wolf, fox, beaver, brown bear, bison, and wild cattle, moose,
and horse, also the ibex. Among the remnants of 30,000 flints there are a
dozen points (feuilles de laurier) and other pieces with the Solutrean
'retouch.' The industry in ivory, bone, and reindeer horn is also varied,
including numerous poniards, polishers, piercers, dart-throwers, and bâtons
de commandement.

Page 427

Fig. 173. Mammoth
sculptured on a fragment
of ivory tusk from the
Solutrean station of
Předmost, Moravia.
After Maška. This figure
is covered with fine lines
representing the long,
hairy coating, and
measures about four and
one-half inches.

This ivory sculpture of the mammoth indicates very accurately the
characteristic contours of the top of the head, and of the back; the striations
on the side represent the falling masses of hair. Other sculptured figures
representing the mammoth are believed to be of Magdalenian age, the best
known being the figures found in the grottos of Bruniquel and Laugerie
Basse, a fragment from Raymonden, Dordogne, and a bas-relief in the
grotto of Figuier, Gard. All these sculptures of the mammoth have in
common the indication of a very small ear—similar to that in the Předmost
model—feet shaped like inverted mushrooms, bordered with short, coarse
hairs, the tail terminating in a long tuft of hairs. If the figure of Předmost is
of Solutrean age, it is by far the earliest of all the sculptured or engraved
animal representations in the mobile art, and is also the most complete of
the animal figurines of this group. It is certainly of more recent date than
the engraved designs of Aurignacian age in the grottos of Gargas and of
Chabot or than the red or black tracings of the mammoth, also of
Aurignacian age, at Castillo, Pindal, and Font-de-Gaume. It is probable that
the mammoth figures of Combarelles are of later date than the Předmost
sculpture and belong to the beginning of Magdalenian times, while those at
Font-de-Gaume belong to the end of Magdalenian times and are the most
recent of all the parietal designs. Despite the differences in age and
technique, all the designs of the mammoth are undoubtedly the work of
artists of a single race; they agree in faithfully portraying the external form
of this great proboscidian which wandered over the steppes and prairies of

Page 428

western Europe from the beginning of the fourth glaciation until near the
close of Postglacial times.

(1) Breuil, 1912.7.
(2) Verneau, 1906.1, pp. 202-207.
(3) Op. cit., p. 204.
(4) Keith, 1911.1, p. 60.
(5) Obermaier, 1912.1, p. 178.
(6) Breuil, 1912.7, p. 174.
(7) Op. cit., pp. 165-168.
(8) Obermaier, 1912.1, pp. 177, 178.
(9) Wiegers, 1913.1.
(10) Schmidt, 1912.1, p. 266.
(11) Geikie, 1914.1, p. 278.
(12) Dawkins, 1880.1, pp. 148, 149.
(13) Ewart, 1904.1.
(14) Obermaier, 1909.2, p. 145.
(15) Sollas, 1913.1, p. 325.
(16) Broca, 1868.1.
(17) Lartet, 1875.1.
(18) Verneau, 1886.1; 1906.1, pp. 68, 69.
(19) Obermaier, 1912.2.

Page 429

(20) Martin, R., 1914.1, pp. 15, 16.
(21) Keith, 1911.1, p. 71.
(22) Klaatsch, 1909.1.
(23) Keith, op. cit., p. 56.
(24) Hauser, 1909.1.
(25) Fischer, 1913.1.
(26) Schliz, 1912.1, p. 554.
(27) Breuil, 1912.7, p. 175.
(28) Op. cit., p. 183.
(29) Op. cit., pp. 177-180.
(30) Schmidt, 1912.1, p. 266.
(31) Breuil, op. cit., p. 178.
(32) Obermaier, 1912.1, p. 181.
(33) Breuil, 1912.7, p. 169.
(34) Breuil, 1912.1, pp. 194-200.
(35) Schmidt, 1912.1.
(36) Breuil, op. cit.
(37) Schmidt, 1912.1, p. 142.
(38) Breuil, 1912.1, p. 202.
(39) Breuil, 1912.6.
(40) Hilzheimer, 1913.1, p. 151.
(41) Fischer, 1913.1.
(42) Makowsky, 1902.1.

Page 430

(43) Schwalbe, 1906.1.
(44) Makowsky, op. cit.
(45) Obermaier, 1912.1, pp. 342-355.
(46) Martin, R., 1914.1, pp. 15, 16.
(47) Schliz, 1912.1.
(48) Déchelette, 1908.1, vol. I, p. 28.
(49) Keane, 1901.1, p. 147.
(50) Keith, 1911.1, p. 30.
(51) Op. cit., pp. 28-45.
(52) Op. cit., pp. 51-56.
(53) Obermaier, 1912.1, p. 93.
(54) Breuil, 1912.7, p. 188.
(55) Arcelin, 1869.1.
(56) Déchelette, 1908.1, vol. I, pp. 137-141.
(57) Schmidt, 1912.1, p. 144, Tafel B.

Page 431

CHAPTER V
MAGDALENIAN TIMES—CLIMATE
AND MAMMALIAN LIFE OF
EUROPE—CUSTOMS AND LIFE OF
THE CRÔ-MAGNONS; THEIR
INDUSTRY IN FLINT AND BONE;
THEIR DISTRIBUTION—
DEVELOPMENT OF THEIR ART,
ENGRAVING, PAINTING,
SCULPTURE—ART IN THE
CAVERNS—CLIMAX OF THE
MAGDALENIAN ART AND
INDUSTRY OF THE CRÔ-
MAGNONS—APPARENT DECLINE
OF THE RACE.
The art and industrial epoch of Magdalenian times is by far the best known
and most fascinating of the Old Stone Age. This period forms the
culmination of Palæolithic civilization; it marks the highest development of
the Crô-Magnon race preceding their sudden decline and disappearance as
the dominant type of western Europe. The men of this time are commonly
known as the Magdalenians, taking their name from the type station of La
Madeleine, as the Greeks in their highest stage took their name from Athens
and were known as the Athenians.
We would assign the minimum prehistoric date of 16,000 B. C. for the
beginning of the Magdalenian culture, and since we have assigned to the
beginning of the Aurignacian culture the date of 25,000 B. C., we should
allow 9,000 years for the development of the Aurignacian and Solutrean
industries in western Europe.

Introduction. Industrial and Artistic Development

Page 432

Well as this culture is known, its origin is obscured by the fact that it shows
little or no connection with the preceding Solutrean industry, which, as we
have noted (p. 331), seems like a technical invasion in the history of
western Europe and not an inherent part of the main line of cultural
development. Thus Breuil(1) observes that it appears as if the fundamental
elements of the superior Aurignacian culture had contributed by some
unknown route to constitute the kernel of the Magdalenian civilization
while the Solutrean episode was going on elsewhere. Again, early
Magdalenian art bears striking resemblances to the superior Aurignacian art
of the Pyrenees, especially the parietal art, as shown by comparing the
Aurignacian engravings of Gargas with the early Magdalenian of
Combarelles. Moreover, the same author observes that, if there is one
certain prehistoric fact, it is that the first Magdalenian culture was not
evolved from the Solutrean—that these Magdalenians were newcomers in
western France, as unskilful in the art of shaping and retouching flints as
their predecessors were skilled. Ancient Magdalenian hearths are found in
many localities close to the levels of the upper Solutrean industries with
their shouldered spear points (pointes à cran) and highly perfected flint
work. Yet the Magdalenians show a radical departure from the Solutrean
type of flint working; both in Dordogne (Laugerie Haute and Laussel) and
in Charente (Placard) the splinters of flint are massive, heavy, badly
selected, often of poor quality, and poorly retouched, sometimes almost in
an Eolithic manner; at the same time, the chance flints, that is, the piercers
and graving-tools made from splinters of any accidental shape, are
abundant. To these people flint implements appear to be altogether of
secondary importance; although the flints are very numerous, they are not
finished with any of the perfection of the Solutrean technique; the laurel-
leaf spear head and shouldered dart head have disappeared entirely, but a
great variety of smaller graving and chasing forms are employed for
fashioning the implements of bone and horn. What a contrast to the
beautiful flints so finely retouched and of such carefully selected materials,
found in the very same stations in middle and upper Solutrean layers!
Thus Breuil, always predisposed to believe in an invasion of culture rather
than in an autochthonous development, favors the theory of eastern origin
for the Magdalenian industry, because this is not wanting either in Austria
or in Poland; two sites of ancient Magdalenian industry have been found by

Page 433

Obermaier in the 'loess' stations of Austria, while in Russian Poland the
grotto of Mas̆ zycka, near Ojcow, exhibits workings in bone resembling
those found at the grotto of Placard, Charente, in the layers directly
succeeding the base of the Magdalenian. The fact that near the Ural
Mountains there has also been found a peculiar Magdalenian culture, the
origin of which is not western, inclines us to believe that the Magdalenian
culture extended from the east toward the west, and then, later, toward the
Baltic.

Fig. 174. One of the large
bison drawings in the
cavern of Niaux, on the
Ariège, showing the
supposed spear or arrow
heads with shafts on its
side. The artist's
technique consists of an
outline incised with flint
followed by a painted
outline in black
manganese giving high

Page 434

relief. After Cartailhac
and Breuil. Greatly
reduced.

This theory of the eastern origin of the Magdalenian industry has, however,
to face, first, the very strong counter-evidence of the close affinity between
Aurignacian and Magdalenian art, which Breuil himself has done the most
to demonstrate; second, the physical, mental, and especially the artistic
unity of the Crô-Magnon race in Aurignacian and Magdalenian times. The
recent discovery of two Crô-Magnon skeletons together with two carved
bone implements of Magdalenian type, at Obercassel, on the Rhine, links
the art with this race and with no other, because, as we remarked above, an
artistic instinct and ability cannot be passed from one race to another like
the technique of a handicraft. Breuil(2) himself has positively stated that the
whole Upper Palæolithic art development of Europe was the work of one
race: if so, this race can be no other than the Crô-Magnon.
We must, therefore, revert to the explanation offered in a preceding chapter,
that the Solutrean technique was an intrusion or an invasion either brought
in by another race or acquired from the craftsmen of some easterly race,
perhaps that of Brünn, Brüx, and Předmost. Why the art of fashioning these
perfect Solutrean spear, dart, and arrow heads was lost is very difficult to
explain, because they appear to be the most effective implements of war
and of the chase which were ever developed by Palæolithic workmen.

Page 435

Larger Image

Fig. 175. Decorated sagaies,
or javelin points, of
bone; pointed at one end
and bevelled at the other
for the attachment of a
shaft. After Breuil.

It is possible, although not probable, that the bow was introduced at this
time and that a less perfect flint point, fastened to a shaft like an arrow-head
and projected with great velocity and accuracy, proved to be far more
effective than the spear. The bison in the cavern of Niaux show several
barbed points adhering to the sides, and the symbol of the flèche appears on

Page 436

the sides of many of the bison, cattle, and other animals of the chase in
Magdalenian drawings. From these drawings and symbols it would appear
that barbed weapons of some kind were used in the chase, but no barbed
flints occur at any time in the Palæolithic, nor has any trace been found of
bone barbed arrow-heads or any direct evidence of the existence of the bow.
In compensation for the decline of flint is the rapid development of bone
implements, the most distinctive feature of Magdalenian industry. In the
late Solutrean we have noted the occasional appearance of the bone javelin
points (sagaies) with their decorative motifs; these become much more
frequent in Magdalenian times. They occur in the most ancient
Magdalenian levels of the grotto of Placard, Charente, which are prior even
to the appearance of prototypes of the harpoon, the evolution of which
clearly marks off the early, middle, and late divisions of Magdalenian times.
These primitive javelins, decorated in a characteristic fashion, are found in
Poland, at the grotto of Kesslerloch and other places in Switzerland, at
many stations in Dordogne and the region of the Pyrenees in southern
France, and in the Cantabrian Mountains of northern Spain.

Page 437

Fig. 176. Head of the forest or
of the steppe horse
engraved on a fragment
of bone, from the Grotte
du Pape, Brassempouy.
After Piette.

It is only above the levels where early types of these javelin points occur
that the rudimentary harpoons of the typical early Magdalenian are found.
The discovery of the bone harpoon as a means of catching fish marks an
important addition to the food supply, which was apparently followed by a
decline in the chase. Later, to the javelin, lance, and harpoon is added the
dart-thrower (propulseur), which gradually spreads all over western Europe,

Page 438

where also the evolution of these bone implements and of the decoration
with which they are richly adorned enables the trained archæologist to
establish corresponding subdivisions of Magdalenian time.

Fig. 177. Polychrome wall-
painting of a wolf from
the cavern of Font-de-
Gaume. After Breuil.

From the uniform character of Palæolithic art in its highest forms of
engraving, painting, and animal sculpture we may infer the probable unity
of the Crô-Magnon race, especially throughout western Europe. During
Magdalenian times various branches of art reached their highest point and
were the culmination of a movement begun in the early Aurignacian. The
artist, whose life brought him into close touch with nature and who
evidently followed the movements both of the individual animals and of the
herds for hours at a time, has rendered his observations in the most realistic
manner. Among the animals represented are the bison, mammoth, wild
horse, reindeer, wild cattle, deer, and rhinoceros; less frequent are
representations of the ibex, wolf, and wild boar, and there are comparatively
few representations of fishes or of any form of plant life; the nobler beasts
of prey, such as the lion and the bear, are often represented, but there are no

Page 439

figures of the skulking hyæna, which at that time was a rare if not almost
extinct animal. While many figures are of real artistic worth and reach a
high level, others are more or less crude attempts; the composition of
figures or of groups of animals is rarely undertaken.

Fig. 178. Crude sculpture of
the ibex, from the
Magdalenian deposit at
Mas d'Azil on the right
bank of the Arize. After
Piette. A little less than
actual size.

Page 440

The artistic sense of these people is also manifest in the decoration of their
household utensils and weapons of the chase. Here the smaller animals of
the chase, the saiga, the ibex, and the chamois, are executed with a sure
hand. Sculpture of animal forms in the large, which begins in Solutrean
times, is continued and reaches its highest point in the early Magdalenian.
At this period the use of sculpture as a means of decoration arises and
extends into the middle and late Magdalenian. These latter divisions are
also distinguished by the reappearance of human figurines, nude, like the
Aurignacian, and occasionally somewhat more slender. Thus it would
appear that the artistic spirit, more or less dormant in Solutrean times, was
revived.
In the variety of industries we find evidences of a race endowed with
closely observant and creative minds, in which the two chief motives of life
seem to have been the chase and the pursuit of art. The Magdalenian flints
are fashioned in a somewhat different manner from the Solutrean: long,
slender flakes or 'blades' with little or no retouch are frequent, and in other
implements the work is apparently carried only to a point where the flint
will serve its purpose. No attempt is made to attain perfect symmetry. Thus
the old technical impulse of the flint industry seems to be far less than that
among the makers of the Solutrean flints, while a new technical impulse
manifests itself in several branches of art: arms and utensils are carved in
ivory, reindeer horn and bone, and sculpture and engraving on bone and
ivory are greatly developed. We find that these people are beginning to
utilize the walls of dark, mysterious caverns for their drawings and
paintings, which show deep appreciation for the perfection of the animal
form, depicted by them in most lifelike attitudes.
We may infer that there was a tribal organization, and it has been suggested
that certain unexplained implements of reindeer horn, often beautifully
carved and known as 'bâtons de commandement,' were insignia of authority
borne by the chieftains.
There can be little doubt that such diversities of temperament, of talent, and
of predisposition as obtain to-day also prevailed then, and that they tended
to differentiate society into chieftains, priests, and medicine-men, hunters of
large game and fishermen, fashioners of flints and dressers of hides, makers
of clothing and footwear, makers of ornaments, engravers, sculptors in

Page 441

wood, bone, ivory, and stone, and artists with color and brush. In their
artistic work, at least, these people were animated with a compelling sense
of truth, and we cannot deny them a strong appreciation of beauty.

Pl. VII. Crô-Magnon man in
the cavern of Font-de-
Gaume, Dordogne,
restored in the act of
drawing the outlines of
one of the bisons on the
wall of the Galerie des
Fresques. Drawn under
the direction of the

Page 442

author by Charles R.
Knight.

It is probable that a sense of wonder in the face of the powers of nature was
connected with the development of a religious sentiment. How far their
artistic work in the caverns was an expression of such sentiment and how
far it was the outcome of a purely artistic impulse are matters for very
careful study. Undoubtedly the inquisitive sense which led them into the
deep and dangerous recesses of the caverns was accompanied by an
increased sense of awe and possibly by a sentiment which we may regard as
more or less religious. We may dwell for a moment on this very interesting
problem of the origin of religion during the Old Stone Age, so that the
reader may judge for himself in connection with the ensuing accounts of
Magdalenian art.

Fig. 179. Decorated bâtons de
commandement carved

Page 443

from reindeer horn with
a large perforation
opposite the brow tine.
After Lartet and Christy.

"The religious phenomenon," observes James,(3) "has shown itself to consist
everywhere, and in all its stages, in the consciousness which individuals
have of an intercourse between themselves and higher powers with which
they feel themselves to be related. This intercourse is realized at the time as
being both active and mutual.... The gods believed in—whether by crude
savages or by men disciplined intellectually—agree with each other in
recognizing personal calls.... To coerce the spiritual powers, or to square
them and get them on our side, was, during enormous tracts of time, the one
great object in our dealings with the natural world."
The study of this race, in our opinion, would suggest a still earlier phase in
the development of religious thought than that considered by James,
namely, a phase in which the wonders of nature in their various
manifestations begin to arouse in the primitive mind a desire for an
explanation of these phenomena, and in which it is attempted to seek such
cause in some vague supernatural power underlying these otherwise
unaccountable occurrences, a cause to which the primitive human spirit
commences to make its appeal. According to certain anthropologists,[AU]
this wonder-working force may either be personal, like the gods of Homer,
or impersonal, like the Mana of the Melanesian, or the Manitou of the
North American Indian. It may impress an individual when he is in a proper
frame of mind, and through magic or propitiation may be brought into
relation with his individual ends. Magic and religion jointly belong to the
supernatural as opposed to the every-day world of the savage.
We have already seen evidence from the burials that these people
apparently believed in the preparation of the bodies of the dead for a future
existence. How far these beliefs and the votive sense of propitiation for
protection and success in the chase are indicated by the art of the caverns is
to be judged in connection with their entire life and productive effort, with

Page 444

their burials associated with offerings of implements and articles of food,
and with their art.

The Three Climatic Cycles of Magdalenian Times
The culture of the Crô-Magnons was doubtless influenced by the changing
climatic conditions of Magdalenian times, which were quite varied, so that
we may trace three parallel lines of development: that of environment, as
indicated by the climate and the forms of animal life, that of industry, and
that of art.
The entire climatic, life, and industrial cycle of which the Magdalenian
marks the conclusion has been presented in Chapter IV (p. 281). After a
very long period of cold and somewhat arid climate following the fourth
glaciation, it would appear that western Europe in early Magdalenian times
again experienced a stage of increasing cold and moisture accompanied by
the renewed advance of the glaciers in the Alpine region, in Scandinavia,
and in Great Britain. This is known as the Bühl stage in the Alps, in which
the snow-line descended 2,700 feet below its present level and the great
glaciers thrust down along the southerly borders of Lake Lucerne a series of
new moraines distinctly overlying those of the fourth glaciation. Another
indication of the lowered temperature and increased moisture in the same
geographic region is found in the return of the arctic lemmings from the
northern tundras; these migrants have left their remains in several of the
large grottos north of the Alps, especially in Schweizersbild and
Kesslerloch, composing what is known as the Upper Rodent Layer, with
which are associated the implements and art objects of the early
Magdalenian culture stage.
We have adopted the minimum estimate of 25,000 years since the fourth
glaciation, but Heim(4) has estimated that the much more recent prehistoric
event of the advance of this minor Bühl glaciation began at least 24,000
years ago, that it extended over a very long period of time, and that the Bühl
moraines in Lake Lucerne are at least 16,000 years of age.
The three climatic changes of Magdalenian times are therefore as follows:

Page 445

First, the Bühl Postglacial Stage in the Alps, which corresponds with what
Geikie has named the Fifth Glacial Epoch, or Lower Turbarian, in Scotland;
for he believes that a relapse to cold conditions in northern Britain was
accompanied by a partial subsidence of the coast lands, that snow-fields
again appeared, that considerable glaciers descended the mountain valleys,
and even reached the sea. At this time the arctic alpine flora of Scotland
also descended to within 150 feet of the sea-level. The result of this
renewed or fifth glaciation in western Europe was the advent of the great
wave of tundra life and the descent to the plains of all the forms of Alpine
life.

Larger Image

Fig. 180. Correlation of the
Postglacial climatic
changes with the four
stages of Upper
Palæolithic culture: the
Aurignacian coincident
with the final retreat of
the fourth glaciation; the
Solutrean coincident
with the interval

Page 446

preceding the Bühl
advance; the
Magdalenian coincident
with the Bühl and
Gschnitz Postglacial
advances; and the
Azilian coincident with
the Daun or third
Postglacial advance.
(Compare Fig. 14.)

Second, it would appear that in middle Magdalenian times, after the Bühl
advance, there occurred a temporary retreat of the ice-fields, and that during
this period the full tide of life from the steppes of western Asia and eastern
Europe for the first time spread over western Europe, including especially
such animals as the jerboa and the saiga antelope, the dwarf pika and steppe
hamster. Correlation is very hazardous, but this ice retreat may correspond
with the Upper Forestian, or Fifth Interglacial Stage in Scotland, described
by Geikie, the stage which he mentions as marked by the elevation of the
Scottish coast with the retreat of the sea beyond the present coast-lines;
geographic changes which were accompanied by the disappearance of
perennial snow and ice, and the return of more genial conditions. The
tundra fauna still prevailed; such a typical arctic animal as the musk-ox
wandered as far south as Dordogne and the Pyrenees, and became one of
the objects of the chase. During what is known as the middle or 'full
Magdalenian' the tundra, steppe, alpine, forest, and meadow faunæ spread
over the plains and valleys throughout western Europe.
Third, the second Postglacial advance, known as the Gschnitz stage in the
Alpine region, appears to have been contemporaneous with the closing
period of Magdalenian culture. This was the last great effort of the ice-
fields to conquer western Europe, and in the Alpine region the snow-line
descended 1,800 feet below the present levels; it marked the closing stage
of the long cold climatic period that had favored the presence of the
reindeer, the woolly mammoth, and the woolly rhinoceros in western
Europe, as well as the close of the 'Reindeer Epoch' of Lartet. Again, in the

Page 447

north of Britain Geikie observes an Upper Turbarian or Sixth Glacial
Epoch, accompanied by a partial subsidence of the Scottish coast, and the
return of a cold and wet climate; there is evidence of the existence of snow
glaciers upon the high mountains only. The Gschnitz stage marks the end of
glacial conditions in Europe, the retreat of the tundra and steppe faunæ, and
the predominance of the forest and meadow environment and life.
In the Alps there was, however, still a final effort of the glaciers, known as
the Daun stage, which, it is believed, broadly corresponds with the period
of the Azilian-Tardenoisian industry, and a climatic condition in Europe
favorable to the spread of the Eurasiatic forest and meadow life.
The key to this great prehistoric chronology is found in palæontology. The
arctic tundra rodents especially are the most invaluable timekeepers;
according to Schmidt(5) there is no doubt whatever that the Upper Rodent
Layer, composed of the animals of the second invasion from the arctic
tundras, corresponds, on the one hand, with the beginning of the
Magdalenian industry and, on the other, with the renewed glacial advance in
the Alpine region, known as the Bühl stage, and probably also with that in
the north. The Upper Rodent Layer of Magdalenian times is found in the
remarkably complete succession of deposits at the stations of
Schweizersbild and Kesslerloch, which are more recent in time than the
'low terraces' bordering the neighboring River Rhine. The fossil animals
prove that after the extreme cold of early Magdalenian times the tundra
fauna gradually gave way to a wide-spread steppe fauna. Along the Rhine
and the Danube the banded lemmings become less frequent; the jerboas,
hamsters, and susliks of the steppes become more abundant. Exactly similar
changes are observed in Dordogne. In Longueroche, on the Vézère, there
occur for the first time in western Europe great numbers of rabbits (Lepus
cuniculus); numerous hares (Lepus timidus) are also observed at the type
station of La Madeleine, especially in the uppermost and lowermost culture
layers. These small rabbits probably came from the Mediterranean region
and denote a slight elevation of temperature. But it is only in the very
highest Magdalenian layers that the animal life of western Europe begins to
approach that of recent times, namely, that of the prehistoric forest and
meadow faunæ.

Page 448

Mammalian Life of Magdalenian Times
Thus it is very important to keep in mind that during Magdalenian times
there were both cold and moist periods favorable to tundra life and cold and
arid periods favorable to steppe life. In the latter were deposited the sheets
of 'upper loess.'
The mammalian life of Magdalenian times is of interest not only in
connection with the climate and environment of the Crô-Magnon race, but
with the development of their industry and especially of their art. It is
noteworthy that the imposing forms of animal life, the mammoth among the
tundra fauna and the bison among the meadow fauna, made a very strong
impression and were the favorite subjects of the draftsmen and colorists; but
the eye was also susceptible to the beauty of the reindeer, the stag, and the
horse and to the grace of the chamois. The artists and sculptors have
preserved the external appearance of more than thirty forms of this
wonderful mammalian assemblage, which accord exactly with the fossil
records preserved in the fire-hearths of the grottos and shelters, and with the
deposits assembled by beasts and birds of prey in the uninhabited caverns.

Page 449

Fig. 181. Reindeer with
outlines first engraved
and then retraced with
heavy lines of black
manganese finely
finished with a wash of
gray tone, from the
Galerie des Fresques at
Font-de-Gaume. After
Breuil.

No artists have ever had before them at the same time and in the same
country such a wonderful panorama of animal life as that observed by the
Crô-Magnons. Their representations in drawing, engraving, painting, and
sculpture afford us a view of a great part of the life of the period, including
its contingent of forms from the tundras, steppes, Alpine summits, and
Eurasiatic forests and meadows, and the one surviving member of the
Asiatic fauna, the lion.
The paintings and drawings of Dordogne chiefly represent the mammoth,
reindeer, rhinoceros, bison, horses, wild cattle, red deer, ibex, lion, and bear.
The caverns of the Pyrenees of southern France present chiefly bison,
horses, deer, wild cattle, ibex, and chamois; the reindeer and mammoth are
relatively rare, and in some cases entirely wanting in the parietal art; this is
singular because in the Pyrenees the reindeer constituted the principal food
of the authors of the drawings and frescos. In the caves of the Cantabrian
Mountains representations of the reindeer are entirely absent, while the doe
and stag of the red deer are frequently pictured; there are only a few
representations of the mammoth and one of the cave-bear. In the drawings
of eastern Spain deer and wild cattle are abundantly represented, and there
is undoubtedly a representation of the moose at Alpera.
Favorite Art Subjects
Tundra Life.
Mammoth.
Woolly rhinoceros.

Page 450

Reindeer.
Musk-ox.

Steppe Life.
Steppe horse.
Saiga antelope.
Wild ass, kiang.

Asiatic Life.
Lion.
Desert horse.

Alpine Life.
Ibex.
Chamois.

Meadow Life.
Bison.
Wild cattle.

Forest Life.
Red deer, stag.
Forest horse.
Cave-bear.
Wolf.
Fox.
Wild boar.
Moose.
Fallow deer.

Sea Life.
Seal.

Reptiles, Birds, Fishes.
(Rarely depicted.)

Page 451

As regards the sources of this great fauna, we have observed that in late
Aurignacian and Solutrean times, at Předmost, Moravia, and elsewhere, the
steppe fauna was not richly represented in western Europe, for it included
only the steppe horse and the wild Asiatic ass or kiang; that the
contemporary tundra fauna lacked two of the smaller but most characteristic
forms, the banded and the Obi lemmings, although all of the large tundra
forms were still wide-spread and freely intermingled with the forest and
meadow life; and that preying upon these herbivorous mammals were the
surviving Asiatic lions and hyænas.

Fig. 182. Modern descendants
of the four principal
types of the horse family
which roamed over
western Europe in Upper
Palæolithic times: (A) the
plateau, desert, or Celtic
horse, (B) the steppe or

Page 452

Przewalski horse, (C) the
forest or Nordic horse,
and (D) the kiang or wild
ass of the Asiatic
steppes.

The successive faunal phases of Magdalenian times, beginning with the
early cold and moist or tundra period, have been determined with wonderful
precision by Schmidt from the animal remains found associated with the
lower, middle, and upper Magdalenian cultures in the grotto and cavern
deposits of northern Switzerland, of the upper Rhine, and of the upper
Danube. This region was lacking in some of the characteristic animals seen
in Dordogne, yet these invaluable records show that throughout the entire
period of Magdalenian times, probably extending over some thousands of
years, the forests, meadows, and river borders of western Europe
maintained the entire existing, or rather prehistoric, forest and meadow
faunæ. The royal stag, or red deer (Cervus elaphus), was no longer
accompanied by the giant deer (Megaceros), which apparently left this
region of Europe in Aurignacian times, but the maral or Persian deer
(Cervus maral) occasionally appears; both the stag and the roe-deer
(Capreolus) were especially abundant in southwestern Europe and the
Cantabrian Mountains of northern Spain, where the stag became the
favorite subject of the Magdalenian artists at the same time that the reindeer
was the favorite subject in the region of Dordogne. In the forests were also
the brown bear, the lynx, the badger, the marten, and in the streams the
beaver; tree squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) appear for the first time; and in
Dordogne rabbits and hares become numerous. Among birds we observe the
grouse and the raven. The wild boar (Sus scrofa ferus) was occasionally
found in the region of the Danube and the Rhine, but abounded in
southwestern Europe and the Pyrenees. The two dominant forms of
meadow life surviving from the earliest Pleistocene times, and widely
distributed throughout the Magdalenian are the bison (B. priscus) and the
wild cattle (Bos primigenius); of these animals the bison appears to have
been the more hardy, and seeking a more northerly range, while the urus
was extremely abundant in southwestern France and the Pyrenees.

Page 453

Fig. 183. The desert or Celtic
horse, with delicate head,
long, slender limbs, and
short back, from a
painting on the ceiling of
Altamira, in northern
Spain. The horse is
painted in red ochre with
black manganese
outlines. The eye, ear,
mouth, nostrils, and chin
are carefully engraved.
After Breuil.

Page 454

In connection with art, the majestic form of the bison seemed to strike the
fancy of the artist more than the less-imposing outlines of the wild cattle;
there are perhaps fifty drawings of the bison to one of the Bos. Among the
forest and meadow life, not recognized in the fossil remains, but clearly
distinguished in the work of the artists, are two types of horses, the forest or
Nordic horse, related to the northern or draught horse, and the diminutive
plateau or desert horse (E. caballus celticus) related to the Arab. With the
forest life should also be numbered the cave bear (Ursus spelæus) of
southwestern Europe and the moose (Alces), indicated by the artists of
Aurignacian times as present in the Cantabrian Pyrenees.

Fig. 184. Heads of four
chamois engraved on a
fragment of reindeer
horn, from the grotto of
Gourdan, Haute-
Garonne. After Piette.

It is the above entire Eurasiatic forest and meadow fauna which survived all
the climatic vicissitudes of Pleistocene time, and which alone remained in
western Europe to the very close of the Upper Palæolithic culture, and into
the period of the arrival of the Neolithic race.
The descent of the European and Asiatic alpine types of mammals to the
lower hills and valleys is one of the most striking episodes of Magdalenian

Page 455

times. The argali sheep (Ovis argaloides) of western Asia had already
appeared in the upper Danubian region during the Aurignacian; it is
replaced in Magdalenian times by the ibex (Ibex priscus), and by the
chamois, which descended along the northern slopes of the Alps and of the
Pyrenees, and became numbered among the most highly favored subjects of
the Magdalenian artists, especially in the mobile art of ivory and bone, and
in the decoration of their spear throwers and bâtons de commandement.
From the mountains also come the pikas or tailless hares (Lagomys
pusillus), the alpine marmot (Arctomys marmotta), the alpine vole (Arvicola
nivalis), and the alpine ptarmigan (Lagopus alpinus).

The Tundra Climate of Early Magdalenian Times
In the first cold moist period the full wave of arctic tundra life appeared in
the whole region between the Alpine and Scandinavian glaciers during the
renewed descent of the ice-fields; this was the tundra stage of early
Magdalenian times, accompanying the Bühl advance. At the stations of
Thaingen, Schweizersbild, Kastlhäng, and Niedernau, appears the musk-ox,
together with the woolly mammoth, the woolly rhinoceros, and the reindeer.
The discovery of the grotto of Kastlhäng, a reindeer hunting station in the
Altmühltale of Bavaria(6) fills out what has long been a gap in the
geographic distribution of the early Magdalenian. The principal objects of
the chase here were the reindeer, the wild horse, the arctic hare, and the
ptarmigan; the royal stag is very rare, and the bison is wanting entirely; a
strong arctic character is given to the fauna by the presence of the banded
lemming, the arctic wolverene, and the arctic fox. From this region the
musk-ox migrated far to the southwest, reaching the northern slopes of the
Pyrenees. At the same time the arctic grouse, the whistling swan, and other
northern birds entered the region of the Rhine and the Danube. But the
surest indicators of a cold tundra climate prevailing during the period of the
Bühl advance are the banded lemming (Myodes torquatus) and the Obi
lemming (Myodes obensis), which are found in the same deposits with the
arctic hare, the reindeer, and the woolly mammoth mixed with the
implements of the early Magdalenian industry at the stations of Sirgenstein,
Wildscheuer, and Ofnet along the upper and middle Danube. There also
appear the ermine and the arctic wolverene; in fact, almost all the

Page 456

characteristic forms of tundra life except the polar bear, which only enters
the northern tundras in the summer season.

Fig. 185. Characteristic forms
of alpine life, which
descended from the
mountains or migrated
from the highlands of
western Asia in
Aurignacian and
Magdalenian times: the
ibex, the chamois, the
alpine ptarmigan, the

Page 457

argali sheep, and the (A)
alpine vole, all shown
one-twenty-fifth life
size; and the (A) alpine
vole also one-fifth life
size.

The regions of the northern Alps bordering the great glaciers of the Bühl
and Gschnitz advances, were barren stretches of rock, and the valleys and
plateaus now free from ice became tundras, where the swamps alternated
with patches of polar willows and stunted fir-trees, while other areas were
covered with low, scrubby birches, or reindeer moss and lichens. The return
of these hard conditions of life undoubtedly exerted a great influence both
upon the physical and mental development of the Crô-Magnon race; it was
at the very period when the life conditions in western Europe were most
severe that the artistic development of these people began to revive. Forced
to return to the shelters and grottos, which certainly were less frequented in
Solutrean times, there was time for the development of the imagination and
for its expression both in the mobile and parietal arts. There was a less
vigorous development of the flint industry, and apparently a degeneration in
physique and stature.
In Germany and northern Switzerland, on the headwaters of the Rhine and
the Danube, the entrance and departure of the northern waves of life are
recorded, especially in the grottos of Sirgenstein, Schussenquelle,
Andernach, Schmiechenfels, and Propstfels. It would appear that the woolly
mammoth and the woolly rhinoceros were not hunted in this region, for
their remains are not preserved in any of the grottos or stations mingled
with the middle or late Magdalenian cultures. On the other hand, we find
the steppe horse, the kiang, the stag, and the reindeer very abundant indeed.
The bison is absent, and wild cattle are very rare; so that this region is not
typical of the mammalian life of Magdalenian times as found in Dordogne
and in the Pyrenees.
The migration of the woolly mammoth and woolly rhinoceros along the
Pyrenees and westward into the Cantabrian Mountains, and the crossing of

Page 458

the Pyrenees by the reindeer, have already been described. In the mural
frescos of Font-de-Gaume, Dordogne, it is noteworthy that the very latest
engravings are those of the mammoth superposed on the fine polychromes
which belong to the period of middle Magdalenian art.

The Dry Steppe Climate of Middle Magdalenian Times
The cold, dry period, when the full tide of steppe life reached western
Europe, is of somewhat uncertain date; it probably began during the stage
of the middle Magdalenian industry and continued into the late or high
Magdalenian. There was certainly an environment attractive to these
peculiar and very highly specialized mammals, which at the present time
are neutral in color, swift of foot, inured to existence on very sparse
vegetation, and adapted to extremes of heat and cold. Among the smaller
steppe forms were the suslik or pouched marmot of the steppes
(Spermophilus rufescens) and the steppe hamster (Cricetus phæus), also the
Siberian vole (Arvicola gregalis); still more characteristic was the great
jerboa (Alactaga jaculus), with long, springy hind legs, and the saiga
antelope (Antilope saiga). With these mammals appeared the steppe grouse
(Perdix cinerea), which is found along the Danube in late Magdalenian
strata; another bird characteristic of the northern steppes and tundras is the
'woodcock owl' (Brachyotus palustris). Accompanying these mammals was
undoubtedly the steppe horse (Equus przewalski), now restricted to the
desert of Gobi; it is said to occur in the grottos of northern Switzerland.
It would appear that the saiga antelope may have reached eastern Europe in
late Solutrean times, for its outline is said to be found in an engraving at
Solutré. Widely spread over Europe was the giant Elasmothere; it would
seem very unlikely that this animal was present in Magdalenian times, for it
certainly would have attracted the attention of the artists. Neither have we
any positive artistic records of the wild ass, or kiang, although certain of the
drawings in the grottos of Niaux and Marsoulas, of the middle
Magdalenian, also of Albarracin, in Spain, may be interpreted as
representing this animal. Thus the Asiatic steppe and desert fauna, which in
the region of the upper Rhine and Danube was restricted to two species of
mammals in Aurignacian and Solutrean times, rises to nine or ten species in

Page 459

middle Magdalenian times, so that for the first time during the entire
'Reindeer Epoch' the steppe and tundra faunæ are equally balanced. There
are also six or seven species of birds from the moors and uplands of central
Asia. The bird life depicted in middle Magdalenian art includes the
ptarmigan or grouse, the wild swan, geese, and ducks.

Fig. 186. Steppe mammals
from the steppes and
deserts of Asia, which
invaded western Europe
in Upper Palæolithic
times; the first arrivals
appearing during the

Page 460

cold, dry period of late
Acheulean times,
becoming more
numerous in the dry
period of Aurignacian
and Solutrean times, and
completely represented
in Magdalenian times.
The saiga antelope, the
(A) steppe hamster, the
(B) great jerboa, and the
kiang, or Asiatic wild
ass, are all shown one-
twenty-fifth life size. The
(A) steppe hamster is
also shown one-fifth life
size and the (B) great
jerboa one-twelfth life
size. Drawn by Erwin S.
Christman.

Page 461

Fig. 187. Ptarmigan, or
grouse, carved in
reindeer horn, from Mas
d'Azil. After Piette. The
restored portions (head
and feet) are indicated by
dotted lines.

The present flora of the subarctic steppes in southeastern Russia and
southwestern Siberia includes forests of pine, larch, birch, oak, alder, and
willow, extending along the banks of the rivers and streams and
interspersed with broad, low, grassy plains. There are many gradations
between the low and high steppes;(7) the climate in summer is relatively

Page 462

warm, the temperature rising to 70°, while the average temperature in mid-
winter hardly exceeds 30°; in general there is a strong contrast between the
summer and winter seasons, the steppe lands in summer are practically
rainless, so that the sand and dust rise with every wind. Thus, both in
summer and winter sand and dust storms play an important rôle. The great
snow-storms of the subarctic steppes are as destructive as those of the more
northerly tundras and often result in great loss of life. Numerous discoveries
tend to prove that similar conditions prevailed in western Europe during
Magdalenian times. Thus at Châteauneuf-sur-Charente, a mingled tundra
and steppe fauna is found containing the bones of many young animals
which must have perished during a blizzard. It will be recalled that in this
region is the station of Le Placard of late Solutrean and Magdalenian age.
Near Würzburg, Bavaria, there is a fauna buried in the 'loess' containing
twenty species of mammals of the tundras and steppes, together with the
bison and the urus.(8)
Perhaps the strongest proof of the extension of cold, dry steppe conditions
of climate is the migration of the saiga antelope (Saiga tartarica) into the
Dordogne region, where it is represented both in carvings and engravings,
and into other parts of southwestern France, where its fossil remains have
been found in thirteen localities in association with a cold steppe fauna. In
the same region have been found the remains of the musk-ox (Ovibos), one
of the most distinctive members of the arctic fauna.

Human Races of Magdalenian Times
It appears that the Crô-Magnon race continued to prevail, yet
anthropologists have long been divided in opinion as to the racial affinity of
the men found in the Magdalenian industrial stage. The most famous burials
are those of Laugerie Basse and Chancelade in Dordogne, each consisting
of skeletons of inferior stature, not improbably belonging to women. They
certainly represent a race somewhat different from the typical Crô-Magnons
of Aurignacian times, as found at Crô-Magnon and in Grimaldi. The
archæologist de Mortillet referred both these skeletons to a new race, the
race de Laugerie. Schliz, who has most recently reviewed this subject, has,

Page 463

however, rightly treated all these people as Crô-Magnons of a modified
type.
The Magdalenian skeleton of Laugerie Basse, found by Massénat in 1872,
was resting on the back, with the limbs flexed, and with it was a necklace of
pierced shells from the Mediterranean: the body apparently had been
covered with a layer of Magdalenian implements. According to the length
of the femur, the individual was 1.65 m., or 5 feet 1 inch in height; the
bones were strong and compact; the skull was well arched, with a straight
forehead and a cephalic index of 73.2 per cent.

Fig. 188. The abri of Laugerie
Basse, Dordogne, a
famous Magdalenian
station and burial site of
the skeleton of Laugerie

Page 464

Basse. This ancient rock
shelter, like that of Crô-
Magnon and many
others, shows at the
present day a cluster of
peasants' dwellings
around its base.
Photograph by Belvès.

The so-called Chancelade skeleton was found in the shelter of Raymonden
in 1888, at a depth of 5 feet, and was also in a folded position, resting
directly on the rock and covered with several layers of artifacts of the later
Magdalenian culture; the limbs were so tightly flexed as to prove that they
had been enveloped in bandages. This skeleton shows a well-arched skull, a
high, wide forehead, and a dolichocephalic head form, but the limbs are
comparatively small, the height not exceeding 1.50 m., or about 4 feet 7
inches; the upper arm and thigh are short, compact, and clumsy, and the
femur is crooked with comparatively thick ends; this skeleton is generally
classed with the Crô-Magnon race, but Klaatsch considers that it may
belong to a distinct type. We cannot disregard, says Breuil,(9) the anatomical
characters attributed by Testut to the man of Chancelade and its
resemblances to the actual Eskimo type; this indication is in favor of a new
element, arriving perhaps from Asiatic Siberia, but acquiring in western
Europe the artistic culture realized and conserved in certain districts by the
Aurignacian tribes and their derivatives. All of the Aurignacian, Solutrean,
and Magdalenian races, however, recall very forcibly the race of Crô-
Magnon, which tends to prove that these transformations in culture were
not made without a notable element of human continuity.
DISCOVERIES OF MAGDALENIAN AGE CHIEFLY ATTRIBUTED TO
THE CRÔ-MAGNON RACE[AV]
Date of
Locality Nature of Remains
Discovery
1863. Bruniquel (Tarn-et-Garonne, Skeletal fragments. Burial.
France).

Page 465

1864. La Madeleine (Dordogne, Skeletal fragments.
France).
1869. Laugerie Basse I (Dordogne, Skeletal fragments.
France).
1871. Gourdan (Haute-Garonne, Skeletal fragments.
France).
1872. Laugerie Basse II (Dordogne, 1 skeleton. Burial.
France).
1872- Sorde (Duruthy) (Landes, 1 skeleton. Burial.
1873. France).
1874. Freudenthal (near Fragments of skulls and of
Schaffhausen, Switzerland). pelvis.
1874. Kesslerloch (near Thaingen, Collar-bone.
Switzerland).
1883. Le Placard (Charente, 8 skulls, chiefly
France). fragmentary.
1888. Chancelade (Raymonden) 1 skeleton, almost
(Dordogne, France). complete. Burial.
1894. Les Hôteaux (Ain, France). 1 skeleton, almost
complete. Burial.
1914. Obercassel (near Bonn, 2 skeletons, male and
Germany). female, almost
complete. Burial. Early
Magdalenian.
Les Eyzies (Dordogne, Skeletal fragments.
France).
La Mouthe (Dordogne, 1 tooth, 1 vertebra.
France).
Limeuil (Dordogne, France). Skull fragments.
Grotte des Hommes (Yonne, 3 skulls and other skeletal
France). fragments.
Brassempouy (Landes, 2 teeth.
France).
Grotte des Fées (Gironde, Fragments of upper and
France). lower jaw.
Lussac (Vienne, France). Fragment of lower jaw.

Page 466

Mas d'Azil (Ariège, France). 1 skull top. Early
Magdalenian.
Lourdes (Hautes-Pyrénées, Skull fragments.
France).
Castillo (Santander, Spain). Skull fragment. Early
Magdalenian.
Gudenushöhle (Austria). 1 infant's tooth.
Andernach (north of Koblenz, 2 child's incisors and 7 rib
Germany). fragments.

Another Magdalenian burial is that at Sorde, Landes, in the grotto of
Duruthy; this skeleton was discovered in 1872, buried at a depth of 7 feet,
the body being ornamented with a necklace and a girdle of the teeth of the
lion and of the bear, pierced and engraved. Seven skulls found in 1883 in
the grotto of Placard, Charente, also belong to the Magdalenian. The
skeleton discovered in 1894 in the grotto of Les Hôteaux, Ain, was buried at
a depth of 6 feet beneath Magdalenian implements; the body, resting on the
back, was covered with red ochre; the thigh-bones were inverted, indicating
that the limbs had been dismembered before burial—a custom observed
among certain savages.

Page 467

Fig. 189. Human skull-tops
cut into ceremonial or
drinking bowls, from the
Magdalenian layer of
Placard, Charente. After
Breuil and Obermaier.

These are the best preserved Magdalenian remains which have been
discovered in France up to the present time. The matter of chief significance
is the survival of modes of burial characteristic of the Crô-Magnons in
Aurignacian times, with the use of color and of ornaments and with the
body in some instances folded and bandaged.
In the great grotto of Placard, near Rochebertier, Charente, a new feature in
the mode of interment has been discovered—the separation of the head
from the body.[AW] The previous ceremonial burials, which began certainly

Page 468

among the Neanderthals in Mousterian times, always show the custom of
burying the entire body; in the Upper Palæolithic there commences the new
custom of imbedding the body in ochre or red coloring matter, and this
obtains from the Aurignacian burials of Grimaldi to the Azilian burial of
Mas d'Azil. The flexing of the limbs is probably also an Upper Palæolithic
custom. It would appear as if the new ceremonial of Placard had been
introduced in the earliest Magdalenian times, for in the lowest Magdalenian
layers four skulls were found closely crowded together, with the top of the
cranium turned downward; of other portions of the skeleton only a humerus
and a femur were found. In an upper layer of the same industrial stage a
woman's skull and jaw were found, surrounded by snail shells, many of
them perforated. Still more singular is the occurrence in Magdalenian strata
of this grotto of two separate skull-tops, fashioned by some sharp flint
implement into bowls (Fig. 189).
Again, at Arcy-sur-Cure three skulls have been discovered placed closely
together, and with them a flint knife in a layer superposed upon an
Aurignacian industry. The Placard type of burial of the head only is shown
again in the Azilian stage at Ofnet, Bavaria.
The uncertainty regarding the racial affinity of the men of Magdalenian
culture has now been entirely removed by the discovery, in February, 1914,
of two skeletons at Obercassel, near Bonn, the first instance of complete
human skeletons of Quaternary age being found in Germany.(12) As
reported by Verworn,(13) the skeletons lay little more than a yard apart; they
were covered by great slabs of basalt, and lay in a deposit of loam deeply
tinged with red. This red coloring matter, which extended completely over
the skeletons and surrounding stones, indicates that it was a ceremonial
burial similar to that practised by the Aurignacian Crô-Magnons. Along
with the skeletons were found bones of animals and several specimens of
finely carved bone, but no flint implements of any kind. The bone
implements include a finely polished 'lissoir' of beautiful workmanship,
placed beneath the head of one of the skeletons; the handle is carved into a
small head of some animal resembling a marten; the sides show the notched
decoration so typical of the French Magdalenian. The second specimen of
carved bone is one of the small, flat, narrow horse-heads, engraved on both
sides, such as are found at Laugerie Basse and in the Pyrenees. One of the
skeletons is of a woman about twenty years of age, and, as is usual in young

Page 469

female skeletons, it exhibits the racial characters in a much less marked
degree than the male skeleton, which belongs to a man of between forty and
fifty years; the cephalic index is 70 per cent; the supraorbital ridges are well
developed, and the orbits are distinctly rectangular; the limb bones indicate
a body about 155 cm., or 5 feet 1 inch, in height.

Fig. 190. The skulls of two
skeletons of the Crô-
Magnon race, one male
(right) the other female
(left), recently
discovered at Obercassel
near Bonn, associated
with Magdalenian
implements. After
Bonnet.

In contrast to this more refined skull, the extremely broad and low face of
the man is entirely disproportionate to the moderately broad forehead and

Page 470

well rounded skullcap; the breadth of the face is 153 mm. and exceeds the
greatest width of the skull, which is only 144 mm. This is a markedly
disharmonic type, the width of the face being due not only to the broad
upper jaw but to the exceptional size and breadth of the cheek-bones. The
skull is decidedly dolichocephalic, the cephalic index being 74 per cent; the
brain capacity is about 1,500 c.cm.; the orbits are rectangular, and above
them extends an unbroken supraorbital ridge, with a slight median frontal
eminence; the nasal opening is relatively small; the lower jaw has a strongly
marked chin; the crowns of the teeth have been worn down until the enamel
has almost disappeared. While the muscular attachments indicate great
bodily strength, the height does not exceed 5 feet 3 inches. As pronounced
Crô-Magnon features, both of the Obercassel skulls show an unusually wide
face; in both the profiles are straight and the root of the nose depressed, the
nose is narrow, and the orbits are rectangular. But, observes Bonnet, the
greatest width of these skulls is not found across the parietals, as in the
typical Crô-Magnons, but just above the ear region, a much lower position;
in this respect the Obercassel skulls resemble the skull of the Chancelade
skeleton.
This very important discovery of two undoubted descendants of the Crô-
Magnon race associated with bone implements of lower Magdalenian
workmanship appears to prove conclusively that the Crô-Magnons were the
art-loving race. The Obercassel skeletons confirm the evidence afforded by
the burials in France that these people were of low stature; perhaps because
of the severe climatic conditions of Magdalenian times they had lost the
splendid physical proportions of the Crô-Magnons living along the Riviera
in Aurignacian times. The skull also, while retaining all the pronounced
Crô-Magnon characters, had undergone a modification in the point of
greatest width.
In the reduction of the stature of the woman to 5 feet 1 inch and of the man
to 5 feet 3 inches, and in the reduction of the brain capacity to 1,500 c.cm.,
we may be witnessing the result of exposure to very severe climatic
conditions in a race which retained its fine physical and mental
characteristics only under the more genial climatic conditions of the south.

Page 471

The Four Industrial Phases of Magdalenian Culture
The industrial development belongs throughout to central and western
Europe rather than to the Mediterranean. It is remarkable that it does not
extend along the African coast, or even into Italy or southern Spain. It has
been found to present four great steps or phases as follows:

Fig. 191. The great abri, or
rock shelter, of La
Madeleine, type station
of the Magdalenian
industry. Ruins of the
abbey beyond.
Photograph by Belvès.

Page 472

The earliest types(14) of the incipient Magdalenian culture, or Proto-
Magdalenian, are nowhere better represented than under the great shelter of
Placard, in Charente, where the deep successive deposits compel a
realization of the long period of time required for the evolution of the
Magdalenian with its wonderful artistic culmination. Even prior to any
discovery of the harpoon or of any example of the art of engraving
comparable to the classic series of higher levels we find three levels of
incipient Magdalenian industry at Placard. Similar local horizons,
recognizable from the type of their javelin points (sagaies) and from their
decorative motifs, are also found at Kesslerloch, Switzerland, and as far east
as Poland. From Dordogne they extend into the Pyrenees and into the
Cantabrian Mountains of northern Spain, but not farther south. There is thus
a very primitive Magdalenian industry wide-spread over central and
western Europe, either autochthonous or influenced from the east, but
certainly not from the Mediterranean. It is only above these primitive
horizons that layers are discovered with the rudimentary harpoons, and then
with the perfected harpoons with single and double rows of barbs. It would
appear as if the basins drained by the Dordogne and the Garonne were at
once the most densely populated and also the centres from which industry,
culture, and art spread to the east and to the west.
In the heart of the Dordogne region is the great rock shelter of La
Madeleine, the type station of Magdalenian culture, and around it are no
less than fifteen stations. This station, in which the lowest industrial layer
(niveau inférieur) is subsequent to the Proto-Magdalenian phase and
belongs to the early Magdalenian, was extensively excavated by Lartet and
Christy(15) during the decade following its discovery, in 1865, and more
recently by Peyrony and others. The industrial deposit is situated at the base
of an overhanging limestone escarpment on the right bank of the Vézère
River; it extends for a distance of 50 feet with an average thickness of 9
feet, the lowest or early Magdalenian levels reaching down below the
present level of the Vézère. It is a significant fact that the river floods which
from time to time occur here also occasionally drove out the flint workers in
Magdalenian times. It indicates an unchanged topography and similar
conditions of rainfall. We must picture this cliff fringed with a northern
flora, these river banks as the haunt of bison and reindeer, and the site of a
long, narrow camp of skin-covered shelters.

Page 473

Among the numerous specimens of typical Magdalenian industry and art
which have been found here may be mentioned a geode of quartzite,
apparently used to contain water, and stone crucibles, usually of rounded
form, adapted to the grinding up of mineral colors for tattooing or artistic
purposes; one of these crucibles, showing traces of color, still remains. The
finest among the art objects is the spirited engraving, on a section of ivory
tusk, of the woolly mammoth charging; this is one of the most realistic
pieces of Palæolithic engraving which has ever been found; there are
indications that the artist used this relatively small piece of ivory for the
representation of three mammoths; but in the reproduction (Fig. 199) all the
lines are eliminated except those belonging to the single charging
mammoth; we observe especially the elevation of the head and the tail, also
the remarkably lifelike action of the limbs and body.
Very numerous industrial levels are discovered in eight or ten overlying
hearths, which are, however, divided into three main levels, as follows:
Niveau supérieur (late Magdalenian culture).
Harpoons with a double row of barbs. Indications that the
climate was colder and drier, resembling that of the
steppes. Bison, horses, and reindeer abundant.
Niveau moyen (middle Magdalenian culture).
Harpoons with barbs on one side only; also bâtons de
commandement. Indications that the climate was more
moist, with frequent inundations from the river. Bison,
reindeer, and horses less abundant.
Niveau inférieur (early Magdalenian culture).
Harpoons with a single row of barbs. Indications of animal
sculpture. Remains of bison and of reindeer, but those of
horses especially numerous.
In the Early Magdalenian we note the invention of the harpoon; its first
crude form is that of a short, straight point of bone, deeply grooved on one
face, the ridges and notches along one edge being the only indications of
what later develop into the recurved barbed points of the typical harpoon.

Page 474

As noted above, this invention was destined to exert a very strong influence
on the habits of these people. Large fish undoubtedly were very abundant in
all the rivers at that time, and this new means of obtaining an abundant food
supply probably diverted the Crô-Magnons in part from the more ardent and
dangerous pursuit of the larger kinds of game. The discovery soon spread,
and among a number of localities where prototypes of the harpoon are
found may be mentioned Placard, in Charente; Laugerie Basse, in
Dordogne; Mas d'Azil, on the Arize; and Altamira, in northern Spain. In the
early Magdalenian also a great variety of flint drills or borers are developed
in connection with the fashioning of bone, including the 'parrot-beak' type,
or recurved flint. The microlithic flints, exclusively designed for fine and
delicate artistic work, are more abundant than in any previous stage, and
were used to shape and finish the bone implements which chiefly
distinguish the Magdalenian culture. Other implements which enable us to
recognize the early Magdalenian culture layers are javelin points of bone or
reindeer-horn with oblique bases, small staves of reindeer-horn or ivory,
oval plates of bone frequently decorated with engraved designs, and
slender, finely finished needles.

Page 475

Larger Image

Fig. 192. Industrial and art
implements of
Magdalenian times,
chiefly elongate flakes
retouched at one or at
both ends for various
uses. After de Mortillet.
160. Long, narrow flint
blade from the type
station of La Madeleine.
161. A similar implement
from the grotto of
Mursens, Lot. 162. A

Page 476

'knife' flake from
Laugerie Basse,
Dordogne. 163. A flint
blade, very characteristic
of the period, from La
Madeleine. 164. A
minute flake with cutting
border and short, curved
point. 165. An elongate
flake shaped into a
grattoir, or planing tool,
at one end, from La
Madeleine. 166. An
elongate, pointed
graving-tool, retouched
at the end and at one
side. 167. A pointed tool
of chalcedony. 168. A
minute pointed flake.
169. A 'parrot-beak'
graving-tool of flint. 170.
A straight flint graver,
from Les Eyzies,
Dordogne. 171. A similar
graver, from Laugerie
Basse. 172. A similar
graver, from La
Madeleine. 173. Flint
graver with base
retouched, from the
Gorge d'Enfer. 174. A
double-ended
implement, burin and
grattoir, from Laugerie
Basse. 175. Flint burin,
or graver, approaching
the 'parrot-beak' type of

Page 477

169, from Les Eyzies.
176. Double burin, or
graver, of flint, from the
Grotte du Chaffaud,
Vienne. All figures are
one-third actual size.

Fig. 193. Typical forms of
Magdalenian bone
harpoons. After Breuil.
(A) 1 to 9, single-rowed
harpoons, characteristic
of the early and middle
Magdalenian; 1, 4, 8,
from Bruniquel; 2, 5,
from Laugerie Basse; 6,
from Mas d'Azil; 7, from
La Mairie; 3 and 9, from
Valle and Castillo. About
one-quarter actual size.
(B) 10 to 15, double-
rowed harpoons,

Page 478

characteristic of the late
Magdalenian; 10, 12,
from Bruniquel; 11, from
Massat; 13, from
Mouthier; 14, from La
Madeleine; 15, from
Kesslerloch,
Switzerland. About one-
third actual size.

The Middle Magdalenian implements were more widely distributed than
the early types, the most characteristic weapon being the harpoon with a
well-defined single row of barbs (Breuil,(16) Schmidt(17)). According to
Breuil, this single-rowed harpoon is rare in the lower layers but abundant in
the upper layers of middle Magdalenian times; with it occur examples of
the single-rowed harpoon with swallow-tail base. Other implements of this
stage are the bone javelin points with cleft base, small bone staves richly
decorated, also numerous needles, finer and more slender than those of the
early Magdalenian. It is very interesting to note that there are no distinctive
inventions in the flint industry, which shows no important advances,
although microlithic flints are still more abundant than before. For
industrial purposes scrapers continue to be very abundant, as well as borers
for the perforation of bone implements. The middle Magdalenian industry is
best represented in the deposits of central and southern France, at
Raymonden, Bruniquel, Laugerie Basse, Gourdan, Mas d'Azil, and Teyjat.
The chief weapon of Late Magdalenian times is the harpoon with the
double row of barbs, which is found at all the principal discovery sites
extending from stations in southwestern and southern France far to the east.
Besides the double-rowed harpoon, the cylindrical chisel of reindeer-horn
frequently occurs, often pointed at the end and with a small curve at the
side; this, like other bone implements, was richly decorated with engraving.
This late Magdalenian level is distinguished everywhere by the rich
decoration of all the bone implements and weapons, as well as of the
'bâtons de commandement.' The quantity of bone needles, more numerous

Page 479

in this stage than ever before, attests the greater refinement of finish in the
preparation of clothing.
This was the culminating point both in Magdalenian industry and art, and
probably also in the morale and modes of living. Characteristic types of this
late Magdalenian culture are found at La Madeleine, Les Eyzies, and Teyjat,
and extend into the northern Pyrenees, at Lourdes, Gourdan, and Mas
d'Azil. Their easterly geographical distribution will be described on a later
page. The microlithic flints now reach their culminating point; to the small
bladed flakes with blunted backs are added little feather-shaped flint blades,
and still others with oblique ends, which begin to suggest the geometric
forms of the succeeding Tardenoisian industry. Among the flint borers we
notice a prevalent type with a stout central point, also the so-called 'parrot-
beak' borer; for the preparation of skins, scrapers are made, as before, of
thin flakes, slightly retouched at both ends to give a rounded or rectangular
form.
Following the late or high Magdalenian stage is a period of decline in
industry. In southern France(18) both flint and bone implements show
unmistakable indications of the approach either of the succeeding
Tardenoisian or Azilian stage. In the Pyrenees both the flints and the great
polishers of deer-horn begin to resemble those which occur in the post-
Magdalenian levels. This industrial stage corresponds broadly with the
period of decline in art, and with the change both in the industrial habits and
in the artistic spirit of the Crô-Magnons.
The divisions of the Magdalenian are, therefore, as follows:

5. Decline of the Magdalenian art and industry.
4. Late Magdalenian typified at La Madeleine, Dordogne.
3. Middle Magdalenian typified at La Madeleine, Dordogne.
2. Early Magdalenian typified at La Madeleine, Dordogne.
1. Proto-Magdalenian typified at Placard, Charente.

Flint and Bone Industry

Page 480

Through the four successive stages of development which we have already
traced (p. 382) there are perceived certain general tendencies and
characteristics which clearly separate the Magdalenian from the preceding
Solutrean culture.
Compared with Solutrean times, when the art of flint working reached its
high-water mark, the Magdalenian palæoliths show a marked degeneracy in
technique, having neither the symmetry of form nor the finely chipped
surfaces which distinguish the Solutrean types; indeed, they do not even
equal the grooved marginal retouch of the best Aurignacian work. The
Magdalenian retouch shows no influence of the Solutrean; it is even more
blunt and marginal than the late Aurignacian. In compensation for this
decadence in the art of retouch, the Crô-Magnons now show extraordinary
skill in producing long, narrow, thin flakes of flint, struck off the nucleus
with a single blow; these 'blades,' which are very numerous, are often not
retouched at all; occasionally a few hasty touches are used to attain a
rounded or oblique end; in other cases a very limited marginal chipping
along the sides or the development of an elongated pedicle (soie) produces
very effective implements for graving and sculptural work.
For the art of engraving perfect burins, burin-grattoirs, and burins doubles
were rapidly made from these thin flakes; also burins with oblique terminal
edge and with the 'parrot-beak' end. For industrial purposes some of the
flints were denticulated around the border, doubtless for the preparation of
fibres and of thin strips of leather for the attachment of clothing to the body
and for binding of the flint and bone lance-heads to wooden shafts.
Extremely fine perçoirs have been found adapted to perforating the bone
needles; the grattoir, single or double, was also fashioned out of these
flakes, and the nucleus of the flint was used as a hammer. Hammers of
simple rounded stones are also found.
But the notable feature of Magdalenian industry is the extensive and
unprecedented use of bone, horn, and ivory. From the antlers of the reindeer
are early developed the sagaies or javelin points of varying size, usually
ornamented along the sides and with several forms of attachment to the
wooden shaft, either forked, bevelled, or rounded. The ornamentation
consists of engraved elongate lines or beaded lines, and of deep grooves
perhaps intended for the insertion of poisonous fluids or the outlet of blood.

Page 481

Fig. 194. Types of the flint
blade with denticulated
edge, a characteristic
industrial tool of
Magdalenian times, from
Bruniquel, Les Eyzies,
and Laugerie Basse.
After Déchelette, by
permission of M. A.
Picard, Librairie
Alphonse Picard et Fils.

Of all the Magdalenian weapons the most characteristic is the harpoon, the
chief fishing implement, which now appears for the first time marked by the
invention of the barb or point retroverted in such a manner as to hold its
place in the flesh. The barb does not suddenly appear like an inventive
mutation, but it very slowly evolves as its usefulness is demonstrated in
practice. The shaft is very rarely perforated at the base for the attachment of
a line; it is cylindrical in form, adapted to the capture of the large fish of the
streams. That a barbed weapon was also used in the chase seems to be

Page 482

indicated by drawings in the grotto of Niaux and lines engraved on the teeth
of the bear, but these drawings indicate the form of an arrow rather than of a
harpoon. The length varies from two to fifteen inches. The harpoons may
have been projected by means of the so-called propulseurs or dart-throwers,
which resemble implements so employed by the Eskimo and Australians of
to-day. These dart-throwers are often beautifully carved, as in the case of
one found at Mas d'Azil, ornamented with a fine relief of the ibex.

Fig. 195. Bone needles from
the grotto of Lacave,
Lot. After Viré.

Then there were bâtons de commandement, carved with scenes of the chase
and with spirited heads of the horse and other animals, which quite
probably were insignia of office. Reinach has suggested that bâtons were
trophies of the chase, and according to Schoetensack they may have been

Page 483

used as ornaments to fasten the clothing. The discovery of mural painting
and engraving suggests the possibility that these bâtons were believed to
have some magical influence, and were connected with mysterious rites in
the caverns, for a great variety of such ceremonial staffs is found among
primitive peoples. Geographically, the bâtons spread from the Pyrenees into
Belgium and eastward into Moravia and Russia.
Slender bone needles brought to a fine point on stone polishers indicate
great care in the preparation of clothing. Associated with the borers are
many other bone implements: awls, hammers, chisels, stilettos, pins with
and without a head, spatulas, and polishers; the latter may have been
employed in the preparation of leather. The borers, pins, and polishers
appear from the very beginning of the period of sculpture. The name of
poniard (poignard) is given to long points of reindeer-horn; one of these
was found at Laugerie Basse.

History of Upper Palæolithic Art
Following the pioneer studies of Lartet, the history of the art of the
Reindeer Period, as manifested in bone, ivory, and the engraved and
sculptured horns of the deer, occupied the last thirty-five years of the life of
Edouard Piette,(19) a magistrate of Craonne who pursued this delightful
subject as an avocation. He was a pioneer in the interpretation of l'art
mobilier, the mobile art. It must be remembered that in Piette's time the
fourfold divisions of Upper Palæolithic culture so familiar to us were only
partly perceived; his studies, in fact, related chiefly to the mobile art of
Magdalenian times, and he undertook to follow its modifications in every
successive grotto, beginning with his brochure La Grotte de Gourdan, in
1873, in which he first announced the idea which underlay all his later
conclusions, that sculpture preceded line engraving and etching. He divided
the art into a series of phases; that of the red deer (Cervus elaphus) he
termed Elaphienne, that of the reindeer Tarandienne, that of the horse
Hippiquienne, and that of the wild cattle Bovidienne. In concluding this
early work of 1873, he remarked: "To write the history of Magdalenian art
is to give the history of primitive art itself." He observed that in sculpturing
the horn of the reindeer the artist was obliged to work in the hard exterior

Page 484

bone and to avoid the spongy interior; this defect in material suggested the
invention of the bas-relief. The statuette he regarded as the assemblage of
two bas-reliefs, one on either side of the bone. Thus he described the ivory
head of the woman of Brassempouy, the only human face of Upper
Palæolithic times which is even fairly well represented; also the two
imperfect feminine torsos in ivory. In 1897, at the age of seventy, Piette
undertook his last excavations, and the sum of his labors is preserved for us
in the magnificent volume entitled l'Art pendant l'âge du Renne, published
in 1907.
The pupil and biographer of Piette, l'Abbé Henri Breuil, observes that his
scheme of art evolution is exact along its main lines.(20) It is true that
human sculpture appears for the first time in the lower Aurignacian, that it
survives the Solutrean, and even extends into middle Magdalenian times,
but this enormous period cannot be placed in one archæological division as
Piette supposed; in truth, he did not suspect the prolonged gestation of
Quaternary art, but contracted into one small division the documents of
numerous phases. At the same time, Piette was right in attributing the
flower of the art of engraving accompanied by contours of animal forms in
relief to the second and third levels of the Magdalenian industry, but he had
no idea that this development had been preceded by a long period in which
engraving had been practised in a timid and more or less sporadic manner
as a parietal art on the walls of the caverns as well as on bone and stone. It
is also true that a considerable facility in sculpture preceded the art of
engraving, but it was arrested in its progress while engraving slowly
developed; in the early choice of subjects the sculptors of middle and late
Aurignacian times showed a preference for the human form, while later, in
Solutrean and early Magdalenian times, they inclined principally toward
animal figures, so that sculpture was not suddenly eclipsed. The first
engravings made with fine points of flint on stone are hardly less ancient
than the first sculptures, and modestly co-exist beside them up to the
moment where engraving, greatly multiplied, largely supplants sculpture.
Finally, observes Breuil, it is one of the glories of Edouard Piette to have
understood that the painted pebbles of Mas d'Azil represented the last
prolongation of the dying Quaternary art.
It is fortunate that the mantle of Piette fell upon a man of the artistic genius
and appreciation of Breuil, to whom chiefly we owe our clear

Page 485

understanding of the chronological development of Upper Palæolithic art.
In the accompanying table (p. 395) are assembled the results of the
observations of Piette, Sautuola, Rivière, Cartailhac, Capitan, Breuil, and
many others, largely in the order of sequence determined through the labors
of Breuil.

Larger Image

Fig. 196. Geographic
distribution of the more
important Palæolithic art
stations of Dordogne, the
Pyrenees, and the
Cantabrian Mountains.
After Breuil and
Obermaier.

We are far from 1880, observes Cartailhac,(21) when the discovery by
Sautuola of the paintings on the roof of the cavern of Altamira was met with
such scepticism and indifference. Knowing the artistic instincts of the
Upper Palæolithic people from their engraving and carving in bone and
ivory, we should have been prepared for the discovery of a parietal art. The

Page 486

publication of the engravings in the grotto of La Mouthe by Rivière(22) in
April, 1895, was the first warning of our oversight, and immediately
Edouard Piette recalled Altamira to the memory of the workers on
prehistoric art. The discovery of Sautuola ceased to be isolated. Led by the
engravings found in La Mouthe, Daleau discovered the engravings in the
grotto of Pair-non-Pair, Gironde. In 1902 there was the double discovery of
the engravings in the grotto of Combarelles, and of the paintings in the
grotto of Font-de-Gaume, communicated by Capitan and Breuil.
Discoveries at Marsoulas, Mas d'Azil, La Grèze, Bernifal, and Teyjat soon
followed.[AX]
STAGES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF UPPER PALÆOLITHIC ART
Sculpture Incised Figures Painted Figures
Azilian. VI. No VI.
animaldrawings. Conventional
Azilian
decoration. Flat
pebbles (galets)
colored in red
and black. Mas
d'Azil,
Marsoulas,
Pindal.
Late V. Entirely V. No animal
Magdalenian. wanting. art. Various
schematic and
conventional
figures and
signs (bands,
branches, lines,
punctuated
surfaces
suggesting the
Azilian galets).

Page 487

Middle Slender human IV. Graffites IV. Polychrome
Magdalenian. figurines in feebly traced; fine animal figures
ivory and bone. lines indicating with the contour
hair predominate in black and
Animal forms in modelling interior through
in reindeer and obtained the a mingling of
stag horn on drawings, as at yellow, red and
implements of Font-de-Gaume black color.
the chase and and Marsoulas. Constant
ceremonial Perfected animal association of
insignia. outlines and raclage and of
details. incisions with
painting. Mains
Fine animal stylisées. Great,
outlines, Grotte de brilliant
la Mairie, polychrome
Marsoulas. frescoes of
Marsoulas,
Perfected Font-de-Gaume,
engraving on bone Altamira.
and ivory.
Animal outlines
in black, Niaux.

Early Animal III. Deeply incised III. Figures of a
Magdalenian. sculpture. lines followed by flat tint and
Bisons of Tuc light graffite Chinese shading
d'Audoubert; contour lines. without
high reliefs of Incised outlines modelling, also
horses, Cap- and hair, e. g. dotted animal
Blanc. mammoths of figures as at
Combarelles. Font-de-Gaume,
Striated drawings, Marsoulas,
Castillo, Altamira, Altamira,
Pasiega. Pasiega.
Soultrean. Bone sculpture Engravings.
in high relief;

Page 488

Isturitz,
Pyrenees.
Animal
sculpture in the
round,
Předmost.
Late Heavy human II. Animal and II. Filling in
Aurignacian. statuettes human figures, at lines at first
(idols) of first very deeply feeble, then
Mentone, incised, then less more and more
Brassempouy, so; four limbs strong, finally
Willendorf, generally figured. associated with
Brünn. Human Designs vigorous, contour
bas-reliefs of somewhat modelling
Laussel. Heavy awkward, as at La which
human Mouthe, then ultimately
figurines of more covers the entire
Sireuil, Pair- characteristic, as silhouette.
non-Pair. at Combarelles. Incised lines
associated with
painting as at
Combarelles,
Font-de-Gaume,
La Mouthe,
Marsoulas,
Altamira.

Early Animals in low I. Figures deeply I. Linear
Aurignacian. relief. incised, heavy, in tracings in
absolute profile; monochrome,
stiff in form as at single black or
Pair-non-Pair, La red lines,
Grèze, La indicating only a
Mouthe, Gargas, silhouette. Two
Bernifal, Hornos limbs out of
de la Peña, four are
Marsoulas, ordinarily

Page 489

Altamira. figured. The
most ancient
Archaic animal paintings of
outlines of Castillo,
Castillo. Altamira,
Pindal, Font-de-
Gaume,
Marsoulas, La
Mouthe,
Combarelles,
Bernifal.
Parietal and
Statuary and Mobile and
mobile art in
bas-relief. parietal art in line.
color.

In 1908 Déchelette listed eight caverns in Dordogne, six in the Pyrenees,
and seven along the Cantabrian Pyrenees of northern Spain, but there are
now upward of thirty caverns in which traces of parietal art have been
found, and doubtless the number will be greatly enlarged by future
exploration, because the entrances of many of the grottos have been closed,
and the remote recesses in which drawings are placed, as in the recent
discovery of Tuc d'Audoubert, are very difficult to explore.
The chief divisions of Upper Palæolithic art are as follows:
1. Drawing, engraving, and etching with fine flint points on
surfaces of stone, bone, ivory, and the limestone walls of the
caverns.
2. Sculpture in low or high relief, chiefly in stone, bone, and
clay.
3. Sculpture in the round in stone, ivory, reindeer and stag horn.
4. Painting in line, in monochrome tone, and in polychromes of
three or four colors, usually accompanied or preceded by line
engraving, with flint points or low contour reliefs.

Page 490

5. Conventional ornaments drawn from the repetition of animal
or plant forms or the repetition of geometric lines.

Drawings and Engravings of the Early Magdlenian
We have already traced the art of engraving, as it first appears in late
Aurignacian times, into the Solutrean; in the latter it is but feebly
represented. Its further development in early Magdalenian times is found in
the engravings made with more delicate or more sharply pointed flint
implements, capable of drawing an excessively fine line; these were
doubtless the early Magdalenian microliths. The animal outlines, with an
indication of hair, are frequently sketched with such exceedingly fine lines
as to resemble etchings; the figures are often of very small dimensions and
marked by much closer attention to details, such as the eyes, the ears, the
hair both of the head and the mane, and the hoofs; the proportions are also
much more exact, so that these engravings become very realistic. Breuil
ascribes to the early Magdalenian the engraved mammoth tracings of
Combarelles. Engravings of this period are also found in the grottos of
Altamira in Spain, and of Font-de-Gaume in Dordogne, and to this stage
belongs the group of does at Altamira, distinguished by the peculiar lines of
the hair covering the face. The subjects chosen are chiefly the red deer,
reindeer, mammoth, horse, chamois, and bison. The striated drawings of
Castillo and Altamira, which partly represent hair and are partly indications
of shading, belong to this period.

Page 491

Fig. 197. Primitive outline
engravings of woolly
mammoths of
Aurignacian or early
Magdalenian times, from
the walls of the cavern of
Combarelles. After
Breuil.

Page 492

Fig. 198. Engraved outlines
and hair underlying the
painting of one of the
mammoths, from the
wall of the Galerie des
Fresques, Font-de-
Gaume. After Breuil.

Page 493

Fig. 199. Charging mammoth
engraved on a piece of
ivory tusk, from the
station of La Madeleine.
After E. Lartet. For the
sake of showing this
figure clearly, other
outlines in this drawing,
which were probably
designed to indicate a
herd of charging
mammoths, are omitted
or represented by dotted
lines. This classic
engraving, described on
pages 384 and 385, is
one of the most lifelike
Palæolithic
representations known of
an animal in action.

Page 494

The engravings in the grotto of La Mouthe were discovered by Rivière, in
1895, and were the means of directing attention afresh to the long-forgotten
parietal art found in Altamira by Sautuola in 1880. The drawings at La
Mouthe begin about 270 feet from the entrance and may be traced for a
distance of 100 feet, scattered in various groups; they manifestly belong to a
very primitive stage, probably early Magdalenian, the point of chief interest
being that, while the greater part of the engravings are in simple incised
lines, here and there the contour is enforced by a line of red or black paint;
this is the beginning of a method pursued throughout the Magdalenian
parietal art, in which the artist carefully sketches his contours with sharp-
pointed flints before he applies any color. This treatment, at first limited to
the simple outlines, led to tracing in many of the details with engraved
lines, the eyes, the ears, the hair; thus Breuil has shown that in its final
development a carefully worked-out engraving underlies the painting. In the
La Mouthe drawings the proportions are very bad; they represent the
reindeer, bison, mammoth, horse, ibex, and urus; spots of red are sometimes
splashed on the sides of the animals; here and there is a bit of superior
work, such as the reindeer in motion.

Page 495

Fig. 200. Engraved outlines
believed to represent
human grotesques or
masked figures found on
the cavern walls of
Marsoulas, Altamira, and
Combarelles. After
Obermaier.

The cavern of Combarelles, discovered in 1901, in Dordogne, near Les
Eyzies, contains by far the most remarkable record of early Magdalenian
art; there are upward of four hundred drawings and engravings representing
almost every animal of early Magdalenian times, among them the horse,

Page 496

rhinoceros, mammoth, reindeer, bison, stag, ibex, lion, and wolf; there are
also between five and six representations of the men of the time, both
masked and unmasked; the style is more recent than that of the oldest
drawings in Font-de-Gaume, but much more ancient than the period of
polychrome art.[AY] The gallery is 720 feet long, and barely 6 feet broad;
the drawings begin about 350 feet from the entrance, and are scattered at
irregular intervals to the very end. In general the art is very fine and
evidently largely the work of one artist; representations of the woolly
rhinoceros and of the mammoth are very true to life; there is a pair of
splendid lions, male and female; the drawings of the horse are abundant,
and side by side we have a representation of several types of horses, the
pure forest type with the arched forehead, the small, fine-headed Celtic
type, and a larger type reminding us of the kiang, or wild ass. Here the
greater part of the work is engraving, as contrasted with the painted outlines
in the cavern of Niaux and with the etched outlines of the Grotte de la
Mairie.

Page 497

Fig. 201. Entrance to the
cavern of Combarelles
near Les Eyzies,
Dordogne, where upward
of four hundred wall
engravings have been
discovered. Photograph
by Belvès.

Page 498

Fig. 202. Cave-bear engraved
in outline, from the
cavern of Combarelles.
After Breuil.

Page 499

Fig. 203. Stone lamp of
Magdalenian age
discovered in the grotto
of La Mouthe by E.
Rivière. It is cut in
sandstone and
ornamented on the lower
surface with the head
and horns of the ibex.
Such lamps were
doubtless used by the
artists to light the deep
recesses of the caverns.
After Rivière, redrawn
by Erwin S. Christman.
One-third actual size.
(Compare Pl. VII.)

Even a large cavern like Combarelles offers comparatively few surfaces
favorable to these engraved lines; but, small or large, such surfaces were
eagerly sought, sometimes near the floor, sometimes on the walls, and again
on the ceilings; even with the brilliant light of an acetylene lamp it is now
difficult to discover all these outlines, some of which are drawn in the most
unlooked-for places. If the extremely fine incisions, such as those
representing the hair of the mammoth, are so difficult to detect with a
powerful illuminant, one may imagine the task of the Crô-Magnon artists
with their small stone lamps and wick fed by the melting grease. One such
lamp has been found in the grotto of La Mouthe, about 50 feet from the
entrance; the workman's pick broke it into four pieces, only three of which
were recovered. The shallow bowl contained some carbonized matter, an
analysis of which led Berthelot, the chemist, to conclude that an animal fat
was used for lighting purposes. Like most other implements, this lamp is
decorated—in this instance by an engraving of the head and horns of the
ibex. Three of these lamps have been found in Charente and Lot, and it is
noteworthy that lamps similar to those of the Magdalenian period are used
in Dordogne at the present day.

Page 500

Fig. 204. Entrance to the
cavern of La Pasiega, not
far from Castillo. The
seated figure with the
staff is M. l'Abbé Henri
Breuil, the present leader
in the study of Upper
Palæolithic art.
Photograph by N. C.
Nelson.

Page 501

In the great cavern of Castillo,[AZ] at Puente-Viesgo, discovered in 1903 by
Alcalde del Rio, which is entered by the majestic grotto already described
on p. 162, the animal drawings are mostly of an archaic character,
belonging to the very beginnings of early Aurignacian parietal art. The most
abundant subjects are horses and deer, which entirely replace the reindeer
drawings so abundant in central France, outlines of the stag and of the doe
being very numerous; on the other hand, the bison and the ox are rarely
drawn. Belonging to the category of most primitive painting are the simple
outlines in black of a horse and of a mammoth, the two limbs of one side
being represented as inverted triangles, terminating in a sharp point, like the
drawings of children. Of more recent style are the rather crude polychrome
bisons, numerous hands outlined in red, and a vast number of tectiform
signs and symbols which represent inferior work of the middle
Magdalenian period.

Page 502

Fig. 205. Carefully engraved
half-figure of a bison,
from the cavern of
Marsoulas; an example
of the engraver's work
preceding the application
of color. After Breuil.
One-eighth actual size.

On the other side of the same mountain is the grotto of Pasiega, discovered
in 1912 by Doctor Hugo Obermaier. This small grotto, about 500 feet above
the river, receives its name as a retreat of the shepherds. In the floor is a
very narrow opening through which one rapidly descends by means of a

Page 503

tube of limestone barely large enough to admit the passage of the body. The
interior is very labyrinthine. After passing through the Galerie des Animaux
and the Galerie des Inscriptions, one reaches, after a most difficult détour,
the terminal chamber, which Obermaier has called the Salle du Trône, the
throne-room; here there is a natural seat of limestone, with supports at the
sides for the arms, and one can still see the discoloration of the rock by the
soiled hands of the magicians or of the artists. In this salle there are a few
drawings and engravings on the walls, and a few pieces of flint have been
discovered. In no other cavern, perhaps, is there a greater sense of mystery
as to the influence, whether religious, magical, or artistic, which impelled
men to seek out and enter these dangerous passages, the slippery rocks
illumined at best by a very imperfect light, leading to the deep and
dangerous recesses below, where a misstep would be fatal. The impulse,
whatever it may have been, was doubtless very strong, and in this, as in
other caverns, almost every surface favorably prepared by the processes of
nature has received a drawing. No industrial flints have been found at the
entrance to this cavern, but some have been traced into the interior. The art
is considered partly of late Aurignacian, perhaps of Solutrean, and certainly
in part of early Magdalenian times; in general it is much more recent than
that of Castillo. It consists both of engravings and painted outlines, with
proportions usually excellent and sometimes admirable. The paintings of
deer are in yellow ochre, of the chamois in red. There are altogether 226
paintings and 36 engravings, in which are represented 50 roe-deer, 51
horses, 47 tectiforms, 16 Bos, 15 bison, 12 stags, 9 ibexes, 1 chamois, and
16 other forms, distributed in all parts of the cave. The outlines are in solid
red color or in stripes of red or black, or there is a series of spots; the
subjects are chiefly the stag, the doe, the wild cattle (which are rather
common), the bison (which are less common), the ibex, and the chamois.
Among the numerous representations of the horse there are two small
engravings of a type with erect mane, both the feet and the hair being
indicated with great care, the limbs well designed and of excellent
proportions, clearly in early Magdalenian style. Of the utmost interest is the
discovery here of two horses drawn with rounded forehead and drooping
mane, the only instance in which the drooping mane of the modern type of
horse (Equus caballus) has been observed in the cavern drawings.

Page 504

Page 505

Fig. 206. Herd of horses
engraved on a small slab
of stone, found in the
grotto of Chaffaud,
Vienne, France. After
Cartailhac. This
impressionistic grouping
and perspective is very
exceptional in
Palæolithic design.
About nine-tenths actual
size.

Fig. 207. Impressionistic
design of a herd of
reindeer engraved on the
radius of an eagle nearly
eight inches in length,
found in the upper
Magdalenian layers of
the Grotte de la Mairie.
After Capitan and Breuil.

In the advanced development of middle or high Magdalenian art, parietal
engraving with finely pointed flint implements presents a nearer approach
to the truth both of proportion and of detail than do the earlier stages. In this

Page 506

stage the engravings seem to consist chiefly of independent animal figures
and to furnish a prelude to the application of color. A simple but striking
example of approaching perfection of technique is seen in the bison (Fig.
205) engraved in the cavern of Marsoulas, where the profile is outlined and
great shaggy masses of hair beneath the neck are admirably indicated. In
these drawings the complicated details of the feet, with their characteristic
tufts of hair, and of the head show far more careful observation. In the great
series of bison at Font-de-Gaume the entire animal is sketched in with these
finely engraved lines, as brought out through the wonderfully close
observation and studies of Breuil. This is quite similar to the practice of the
modern artist who sketches his figure in crayon or charcoal before applying
the color.

Fig. 208. Reindeer and
salmon engraved on an
antler, from Lorthet,
Hautes-Pyrénées. After
Piette. This design is
believed to represent a
herd of reindeer crossing

Page 507

a stream, one of the very
rare Palæolithic attempts
at composition.

There are two quite different styles in this engraving, one seen in the deep
incised lines of the reindeer head in the cavern of Tuc d'Audoubert (Fig.
232), a complete design in itself, another seen in the deep incisions in the
limestone outlining the horses and the bison as observed in the cavern of
Niaux (Fig. 174). Here the engraved line is followed by the application of a
black painted line, the effect being to bring out the body in the surrounding
rock so as to give the silhouette a high relief.
In the drawings in the large on these curved wall surfaces, only part of
which could be seen by the eye at one time, the difficulties of maintaining
the proportions were extreme, and one is ever impressed by the boldness
and confidence with which the long sweeping strokes of the flint were
made, for one rarely if ever sees any evidences of corrected outline. Only a
lifelong observer of the fine points which distinguish the different
prehistoric breeds of the horse could appreciate the extraordinary skill with
which the spirited, aristocratic lines of the Celtic are executed, on the one
hand, and, on the other, the plebeian and heavy outlines of the steppe horse.
In the best examples of Magdalenian engraving, both parietal and on bone
or ivory, one can almost immediately detect the specific type of horse which
the artist had before him or in mind, also the season of the year, as indicated
by the representation of a summer or winter coat of hair.

Page 508

Fig. 209. Outlines of a lioness
and a small group of
horses of the Celtic or
Arab type, a delicate
wall engraving in the
Diverticule final of the
cavern of Font-de-
Gaume. After Breuil.

The realism of most of the parietal art passes into the impressionism of the
excessively fine engravings on bone or reindeer horn, executed with a few
strokes, of a herd of horses or of reindeer (Fig. 207), or where a herd of deer
is seen (Fig. 208) crossing a stream full of fishes, as in the well-known
engravings on reindeer horn found in the grotto of Lorthet, in the Pyrenees.
This is one of the very rare instances in Palæolithic art, either engraving or
painting, which shows a sense of composition or the treatment of a subject
or incident involving more than one figure. Others are the herd of passing
reindeer found engraved on a bit of schist in the grotto of Laugerie Basse,
the lion facing a group of horses engraved on a stalagmite at Font-de-
Gaume, and the procession of mammoths engraved upon a procession of
bison in the same cavern.

Beginnings of Painting

Page 509

The beginnings of painting in Aurignacian times, consisting of simple
contours and crude outlines in red or black, with little or no attempt at
shading, pass in early Magdalenian time(24) into a long phase of
monochromes, either in black or red, in which the technique pursues a
number of variations, from simple linear treatment, continuous or dotted, to
half tints or full tints, gradually encroaching on the sides of the body from
the linear contour. Of this order are the figures in flat tints and shading,
resembling those of the Chinese, without modelling; also the figures
entirely covered with dots, such as are seen at Marsoulas, Font-de-Gaume,
and Altamira. The tints, as in the drawing of the galloping steppe horse,
pass inward from the black outline to enhance the effect of roundness or
relief. In the splendid series of paintings in the cavern of Niaux there is little
more than the black outline of the body, but the covering of the sides with
lines, indicating the hair, lends itself to the rounded presentation of form. A
somewhat similar effect is sought in the lines of the woolly rhinoceros
painted in red in the cavern of Font-de-Gaume, which Breuil attributes to
the Aurignacian stage, but which also suggests the early Magdalenian.

Page 510

Fig. 210. Early painting. A
small horse of the Celtic
or Arab type, with
painted outline and body
colored in black, from a
wall of the cavern of
Castillo, Spain. After
Breuil.

Fig. 211. Early painting.
Galloping horse of the
Celtic or of the steppe
type painted in black and
white, from a wall of the
cavern of Font-de-
Gaume. After Breuil.

Page 511

Fig. 212. Opening (cross) of
the cavern of Niaux, in
the Pyrenees, near
Tarascon.

Drawings in Various Caverns of the Early and Middle Magdalenian
The grandest cavern thus far discovered in France is that of Niaux (1906),
which from a small opening on the side of a limestone mountain and 300
feet above the River Vic de Sos extends almost horizontally 4,200 feet into
the heart of the mountain.(25) Not far from Tarascon on the Ariège it lay
near one of the most accessible routes between France and Spain. Passing
through the long gallery beyond the borders of the subterranean lake which
bars the entrance, at a distance of half a mile we reach a great chamber
where the overhanging walls of limestone have been finely polished by the
sands and gravels transported by the subglacial streams; on these broad,
slightly concave panels of a very light ochre color are drawings of a large
number of bison and of horses, as fresh and brilliant as if they were the

Page 512

work of yesterday; the outlines drawn with black oxide of manganese and
grease on the smooth stone resemble coarse lithography. The animals are
drawn in splendid, bold contours, with no cross-hatching, but with solid
masses of bright color here and there; the bison, as the most admired animal
of the chase, is drawn majestically with a superb crest, the muzzle most
perfectly outlined, the horns indicated by single lines only, the eyes with the
defiant expression highly distinctive of the animal when wounded or
enraged. Here for the first time are revealed the early Magdalenian methods
of hunting the bison, for upon their flanks are clearly traced one or more
arrow or spear heads with the shafts still attached; the most positive proof
of the use of the arrow is the apparent termination of the wooden shaft in
the feathers which are rudely represented in three of the drawings. There are
also many silhouettes of horses which strongly resemble the pure Asiatic
steppe type now living in the desert of Gobi, the Przewalski horse, with
erect mane and with no drooping forelock; in contrast to the bison, the eyes
are rather dull and stupid in expression. There are also drawings of other
types of horses, a very fine ibex, a chamois, a few outlines of wild cattle,
and a very fine one of the royal stag; we find no reindeer or mammoth
represented. In some of the narrower passages the rock has been beautifully
sculptured by water, and the artists have been quick to take advantage of
any natural lines to add a bit of color here or there and thus bring out the
outline of a bison.

Page 513

Fig. 213. Engraved and
painted horse, apparently
of the Celtic type and
with heavy winter coat,
from the cavern of
Niaux. There is a mark
behind the right shoulder
which has been
interpreted as the sign of
an arrow or spear head.
After Cartailhac and
Breuil. (Compare Fig.
174.)

Page 514

Fig. 214. Professor Emile
Cartailhac at the entrance
of the cavern of Le
Portel, Ariège.
Photograph by H. F.
Osborn.

Page 515

Fig. 215. Finely engraved
outlines of the Celtic
horse and of the reindeer,
in the Grotte de la
Mairie, near Teyjat,
Dordogne. After Capitan
and Breuil.

Presenting the widest possible contrast to Niaux is the cavern of Le Portel,
west of Tarascon, with its contracted entrance and a very rapidly descending
passage hardly broad enough to admit the body. This narrow and tortuous
cave terminates in an extremely small passage, so narrow as barely to admit
the athletic and determined artist explorer, the Abbé Breuil. Here, as in
Font-de-Gaume and other caverns, is one of the greatest mysteries of the
cave art, namely, that these terminal and dangerous diverticules finals were
wrought with some of the most careful and artistic designs. Le Portel, like
Niaux, reveals a single style, but one altogether different. Very numerous
bison are drawn in outline both in red and black; the sides of the body are
often dotted with red or hatched in close parallel lines. On a long horizontal
panel are seen many bison in red, and one observes here a finely drawn pair
of bison feet in the best Magdalenian style. The horse as represented here is
of a quite different type with thin upper tail and a tail-tuft resembling that of

Page 516

the wild ass, so that one is almost tempted to believe that the kiang is
intended, but the ears are too short; it has a high rump and a high,
splendidly arched neck, like that of the stallion, and the eye is better drawn;
the body is covered with long vertical or oblique lines which might be
mistaken for stripes, but this hatching is a matter of technique only. Again,
the mane is erect, and there is no forelock; in fact, none of these
Magdalenian artists has represented the horse with the forelock, indicating
that this character of the modern horse was unknown in western Europe and
probably came in during Neolithic times.

Fig. 216. Reindeer, cave-bear,
and two horses of the
large-headed forest type
with arched forehead,
engraved on a panel
about twenty inches in
length in the Grotte de la
Mairie. After Capitan
and Breuil.

Page 517

Fig. 217. Wild cattle, bull and
cow (Bos primigenius),
engraved in the Grotte de
la Mairie, each figure
being about twenty
inches in length. After
Capitan and Breuil.

Of an entirely different type are the beautifully engraved miniature figures
of animals discovered in 1903 in the Grotte de la Mairie.(26) The outlines,
from 18 to 20 inches in length, are sharply engraved on the limestone
stalagmites; they are all in the middle Magdalenian style and include the
stag, reindeer, bison, cave-bear, lion, wild cattle, and two very distinct types
of horses: one of these types is large-headed with an arched forehead; this is
probably the forest type and perhaps represents the horse most abundant at
the Solutré encampment (see p. 288); the other horse is small-headed, with
a perfectly flat, straight forehead, corresponding with the Arab or Celtic
pony type.

Drawings and Paintings of the End of the Middle Magdalenian
The fourth and final developmental phase of painting flowers out toward
the end of middle Magdalenian times in the grand period of polychromes.
These are first etched with underlying lines engraved with flint, the surface

Page 518

of the limestone having been previously prepared by the thinning or
scraping of the borders (raclage) to heighten the relief of the drawing; then
a very strong contour is laid down in black, and this may be followed by a
further contour line in red (the use of black and red is very ancient); an
ochreous brown color is mixed in, conforming well with what we know to
be the tints of the hairy portions of the bison. Thus gradually a complete
polychrome fresco art develops. The final stage of this art follows, in which
the filling out of various tones of color requires the use of black, brown,
red, and yellowish shades. The underlying or preliminary engraving now
begins to recede, being retained only for the tracing in of the final details of
the hair, the eyes, the horns, and the hoofs. The early stages of this art are
seen in the cavern of Marsoulas, and its height is reached in the mural
frescos of Font-de-Gaume and in the ceiling of Altamira, the latter still in a
perfect and brilliant state of preservation.

Fig. 218. Outline of one of the
bison in the Galerie des
Fresques at Font-de-

Page 519

Gaume, showing the
preliminary etching or
engraving preparatory to
the polychrome fresco
painting. After Breuil.

Pl. VIII. One of the bisons on
the ceiling of Altamira,
representing the final
stage of polychrome art
in which four shades of
color are used. After
Breuil.

Page 520

Fig. 219. Entrance on the right
to the grotto leading to
the great cavern of Font-
de-Gaume on the Beune.
Photograph by N. C.
Nelson.

To prepare the colors, ochre and oxide of manganese were ground down to
a fine powder in stone mortars; raw pigment was carried in ornamented
cases made from the lower-limb bones of the reindeer, and such tubes still
containing the ochre have been found in the Magdalenian hearths; the
mingling of the finely ground powder with the animal oils or fats that were
used was probably done on the flat side of the shoulder-blade of the
reindeer or on some other palette. The pigment was quite permanent, and in
the darkness of the Altamira grotto it has been so perfectly preserved that
the colors are still as brilliant as if they had been applied yesterday.

Page 521

The art of the grotto of Marsoulas, in the Pyrenees, is both of an earlier and
of a later period; the engraved lines, as of the head and front of a bison, are
beautifully done in advanced Magdalenian style, deep incisions
representing the larger outlines and finer incisions representing the hair;
here the outlines are also traced in color, and there are several masks or
grotesques of the human face; these last are treated with a total disregard of
the truth which characterizes the animal work. Among the few bison
represented here, some are covered with dots or splashes of color, others
show the painted outline which begins to extend over the surface with
gradations of tint, anticipating the color effects attained in the finished
paintings of Altamira and of Font-de-Gaume. All the details of the early
technique are found here: the artist outlines the form with an engraved line;
he traces in black color the contours of the head and of the body; he begins
to apply masses of red over the figure. This beginning of polychrome art at
Marsoulas is a step toward coloring the entire surface with red ochre and
black, as in the finished paintings of a later period.

Larger Image

Fig. 220. Map of the cavern of
Font-de-Gaume,
showing the 'Rubicon,'
the Grande Galerie des
Fresques, in which the

Page 522

chief polychrome
paintings are found, and
the Diverticule final.
After Capitan.

Fig. 221. Narrow passage in
the cavern of Font-de-
Gaume, known as the
'Rubicon.' On the left
wall at this point are two
painted bison, and on
both walls are marks left

Page 523

by the claws of the cave-
bear. After Lassalle.

The grand cavern of Font-de-Gaume,(27) on the Beune, not far from Les
Eyzies, contains the most complete record of Upper Palæolithic art,
especially from the close of Aurignacian to the close of Magdalenian times.
There are crude Aurignacian drawings, simple outlines painted in black,
outlines supplemented by the indication of hair (examples of the early
stages in the development of polychrome work as well as of the very
highest stages), compositions like the lion and the group of horses, and the
murals in the Galerie des Fresques, which show a general composition in
the processions of animals, as well as some special compositions such as
the reindeer and bison facing each other. The life depicted is largely that of
the tundras, mammoths, rhinoceroses, and reindeer, but it also includes the
steppe or Celtic type of horse, represented galloping (Fig. 211), and a small
group of horses of the Arab or Celtic type. Of the meadow fauna the bison
is generally represented in preference to the wild ox or urus.

Fig. 222. Plan of a portion of
the left wall decoration
in the Galerie des
Fresques at Font-de-
Gaume, showing

Page 524

reindeer and the
procession of bison.
After Breuil.

Throughout the cavern the favorable surfaces of the walls are crowded with
engravings, and in the Galerie des Fresques, beyond the narrow passage
known as the 'Rubicon' (Fig. 221), we see altogether the finest examples of
Upper Palæolithic art. On each side of this gallery is a peculiarly
advantageous mural surface, broad, relatively smooth, and gently concave
(Pl. VII), probably the best which any cavern afforded, and here we observe
great processions of mammals superposed upon each other, like the records
of a palimpsest, as if such a surface was so rare that it was visited again and
again. The most imposing series is that of the bison, done in the finest
polychrome style, mostly headed in one direction. The reindeer form
another series and in some instances face each other, although mainly
arranged in a long procession facing to the left. This superposition of
drawing upon drawing ends with the latest superposition in finely incised
lines of a great procession of mammoths upon that of the polychrome
bisons. It is somewhat difficult to reconcile a religious or votive
interpretation with the multiplication of these drawings upon each other.
Moreover, it appears to be inconsistent with the reverent spirit which
pervades the work in this and in all other caverns, for what impresses one
most is the absence of trivial work or meaningless drawings.

Page 525

Fig. 223. Another portion of
the left wall decoration
of the Galerie des
Fresques, showing the
preliminary engraving
(above), and the painting
(below) of the great
procession of
mammoths, superposed
upon drawings of the
bison, reindeer, and
horse. This section is
about fourteen feet in
length. After Breuil.

It seems as if at every stage in their artistic development these people were
intensely serious about their work, each drawing being executed with the

Page 526

utmost possible care, according to the degree of artistic development and
appreciation.
In the great gallery of frescos we find not less than eighty figures, in some
cases partly covered by a fine sheen of stalagmitic limestone; these include
49 bison, 4 reindeer, 4 horses, and 15 mammoths. The bison polychromes
have suffered somewhat in color and are far less brilliant than those at
Altamira. In the polychromes the color is applied either in long lines of red
or black surrounding the contours of the animal or in flat tints placed side
by side, or again the two colors are mingled and give intermediate tints with
striking effect. On one of the finest of these bison is the underlying drawing
of a reindeer, a wild boar, and the superposition of an excellent engraving of
a mammoth, which is represented on an altogether different scale, so that it
falls well within the body lines of the bison (Fig. 224). In each of these
mammoths the grotesque but truthful contour is preserved in the drapery of
hair which almost completely envelops the limbs; the emphasizing of the
sudden depression of the dorsal line behind the head is everywhere the
same and undoubtedly conforms very closely to nature.

Page 527

Fig. 224. Detail of the
engraving of the central
group of figures on the
left wall decoration of
the Galerie des Fresques
(see Fig. 223), showing
the etching of a
mammoth superposed
upon that of a bison,
superposed in turn upon
those of a reindeer and of
a wild boar. These
figures are on different
scales, and in the present
faded condition of the
frescoes are difficult to
detect. After Breuil.

Page 528

Fig. 225. Entrance to the
cavern of Altamira,
showing the proximity of
the roof of the cavern to
the present surface of the
earth. Photograph by N.
C. Nelson.

After passing the Galerie des Fresques we penetrate to the final recess
called the Diverticule final, through excessively narrow tubular openings
barely admitting the body, and we are again overcome with the mystery as
to what impulse carried this art into the dark, deep portions of the caverns.
If it were due to a feeling partly religious which, regarded the caverns with

Page 529

special awe, why do we find equally skilful and conscientious work on all
the mobile utensils of daily life and of the chase, apart from the caverns?
The superposition of one drawing upon another, which is especially
characteristic of this cavern, does not seem to strengthen the religious
interpretation.
It would appear that the love of art for art's sake, akin in a very rudimentary
form to that which inspired the early Greeks, together with the fine spaces
which these caverns alone afforded for larger representations, may be an
alternative explanation. There is no evidence that numbers of people
entered these caverns. If this had been the case there would be many more
examples of inartistic work upon the walls. It is possible that the Crô-
Magnon artists constituted a recognized class especially gifted by nature,
quite distinct from the magician class or the artisan class. The dark recesses
of the caverns opening back of the grottos may have been held in awe as
mysterious abodes. In line with this theory is the suggestion that the artists
may have been invited into the caverns by the priests or medicine-men to
decorate the walls with all the animals of the chase.

Fig. 226. Plan showing the
grouping of bison,
horses, red deer, and
wild boar, in the
polychrome paintings on

Page 530

the ceiling of Altamira.
After Breuil.

The polychromes of the ceiling of Altamira in northern Spain, which rank in
the crude art of Palæolithic times much as the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel
does in modern art, are somewhat more conventional in technique than
those of Font-de-Gaume, but they are manifestly the work of the same
school, and prove that the technique of art spread like that of engraving, of
sculpture, and of the preparation of flint and bone implements all over
southwestern Europe. One could not have more striking proof of the unity
of race, of a community of life, and of an interchange of ideas among these
nomadic people than the close resemblance which is observed in the art of
Altamira, Spain, and that of Font-de-Gaume, 290 miles distant, in
Dordogne.

Page 531

Fig. 227. The ceiling of
Altamira, showing the
round projecting bosses
of limestone on which
the recumbent figures of
the bison are painted.
After Lassalle.

Fig. 228. Female bison lying
down with the limbs
drawn beneath the body,
so that only the horns
and tail project beyond
the convex surface of the
limestone boss on the
ceiling of Altamira. After
Breuil.

Page 532

Very picturesque is the account of the discovery of this wonderful ceiling,
made not by the Spanish archæologist Sautuola himself, but by his little
daughter, who, while he was searching for flints on the floor of the cavern,
was the first to perceive the paintings on the ceiling and to insist upon his
raising his lamp aloft. This was in 1879, long before the discovery of
parietal art in France. The ceiling is broad and low, within easy reach of the
hand, and the oval bosses of limestone (Fig. 227), from 4 to 5 feet in length
and from 3 to 4 in width, led to the development here of one of the most
striking characteristics of all Palæolithic art, namely, the artist's adaptation
of the subject to his medium and to the character of the surface upon which
he was working. It seems to show a high order of creative genius that each
of these projecting bosses was chosen for the representation of a bison lying
down, with the limbs drawn up in different positions beneath the body (Fig.
228) and very carefully designed, and with the tail or the horns alone
projecting beyond the convex surface to the surrounding plane surface. This
is the only instance known where the bison are represented as lying down,
in most lifelike attitudes, showing the soles of the hoof, observed with the
greatest care and represented by a few strong and significant lines. Thus
while the Altamira coloring inclines to conventionality, the pose of these
animals indicates the greatest freedom of style and mastery of perspective
anywhere observed. In this wonderful group there is also a bison bellowing,
with his back arched and his limbs drawn under him as if to expel the air.
One striking feature in all these paintings is the vivid representation of the
eye, which in every case is given a fierce and defiant character, so
distinctive of the bison bull when enraged. We also observe a wild boar in a
running attitude and several spirited representations of the horse and of the
female deer. The cavern of Altamira, besides this chef-d'œuvre, contains
work of a very advanced character, as indicated in the imposing engraving
of the royal stag (Fig. 229), which is altogether the finest representation of
this animal which has thus far been discovered in any cavern.

Page 533

Fig. 229. The royal stag
(Cervus elaphus)
engraved on the ceiling
of the cavern of
Altamira. About twenty-
six inches in length.
After Breuil. One-eighth
actual size.

Altamira, like Font-de-Gaume, presents many phases of the development of
art in Magdalenian times. There is a Solutrean layer in the foyer of this
great cavern, but Breuil is not inclined to attribute any of the art to this
period. The first entrance of Altamira by the Crô-Magnon artists is dated by
the discovery of engravings on bone of the female red deer, which are
identical with those on the walls and which belong to very ancient

Page 534

Magdalenian times, the period at which the caverns of Castillo and La
Pasiega were also entered.(28)

Sculpture
Animal sculpture in the round, which is indicated by the few statuettes
found with the burial at Brünn, Moravia, and by the ivory mammoth
statuette found at Předmost, continued into early Magdalenian times and
certainly constitutes one of the most distinctive features of the art of that
period, because in the later Magdalenian it took a different trend in the
direction of decorative sculpture. Only two fine examples of early
Magdalenian animal sculpture have been found, but these are of such a
remarkable character as to indicate that modelling in the round was widely
pursued at this time. These are the bisons discovered in 1912 in the cavern
of Tuc d'Audoubert near Montesquieu, in the Pyrenees, and the fine bas-
reliefs of horses at the shelter of Cap-Blanc, on the Beune, in Dordogne.

Fig. 230. Statuette of a
mammoth in reindeer

Page 535

horn from the Abri de
Plantade at Bruniquel.
After Piette. "A statuette
presenting the general
form of the mammoth
with some fantastic
features. It formed part
of a pendant of which the
shank, terminating with a
perforation, has been
broken. The tusks were
laid against this shank
and strengthened it. The
incisions bordered by
notches suggest the
nostrils of some
imaginary monster. The
trunk seems to grow out
of the neck, not the head.
The tail having been
broken off in Palæolithic
times, the owner made a
hole in the back and
inserted one there. The
material was too thin to
admit of representing the
proper thickness of the
animal. It was made to
be viewed from the
side."

Page 536

Fig. 231. Entrance to the
cavern of Tuc
d'Audoubert, near
Montesquieu-Avantès in
the Pyrenees. This is one
of the rare instances in
which the stream that
formed the cavern is still
flowing from the
entrance. Photograph by
N. C. Nelson.

Page 537

Fig. 232. Head of a reindeer
deeply incised or
engraved in the
limestone wall of the
cavern of Tuc
d'Audoubert. After
Bégouen.

In company with Professor Cartailhac the writer had the good fortune to
enter the cavern of Tuc d'Audoubert a few days after its discovery by the
Comte de Bégouen and his sons; it is still in the making, for out from the
entrance flows a stream of water large enough to float a small boat, by
which the first of a series of superbly crystallized galleries is reached. After

Page 538

passing through a labyrinth of passageways and chambers a favorable
surface was found where the Bégouen party showed us a whole wall
covered with low-engraving reliefs, very simply done, fine in execution,
with sure and firm outlines of the bison, the favorite subject as in all other
caverns; horses fairly well executed and of the same steppe type as those in
the near-by cavern of Niaux; one superbly engraved contour of the reindeer,
with its long, curved horns; the head of a stag with its horns still in the
velvet; and a mammoth. All this work is engraved; there are no drawn
outlines, but here and there are splashes of red and black color. Shortly
afterward a great discovery was made in this cavern; it is described as
follows by the Comte de Bégouen:[BA] "To-day I am happy to give you
excellent news from the cavern Tuc d'Audoubert. As you were the first to
visit this cavern, you will also be the first to learn that in an upper gallery,
very difficult of access, at the summit of a very narrow ascending passage,
and after having been obliged to break a number of stalactites which
completely closed the entrance, my son and myself have found two superb
statuettes in clay, about 60 cm. in length, absolutely unbroken, and
representing bison. Cartailhac and Breuil, who have come to see them, were
filled with enthusiasm. The ground of these chambers was covered with
imprints of the claws of the bear, skeletons of which were buried here and
there. The Magdalenians have passed through this ossuary and have drawn
out all the canine teeth to make ornaments of them. Their steps left their
fine impressions on the humid and soft clay, and we still see the outlines of
several bare human feet. They had also lost several flakes of flint and the
tooth of an ox pierced at the neck; we have collected them, and it seems as
if they had only dropped yesterday; the Magdalenians also left an
incomplete model of a bison and some lumps of kneaded clay which still
carry the impression of their fingers. We produce the proof that in this
period all branches of art were cultivated." This model of the male and
female bison in clay has been described by Cartailhac as of perfect
workmanship and of ideal art.

Page 539

Fig. 233. Two bison, male and
female, modelled in clay,
discovered in the cavern
of Tuc d'Audoubert. The
length of each of these
models is about two feet.
After Bégouen.

Page 540

Fig. 234. One of a series of
horses of the high-bred
Celtic type, sculptured in
high relief on the wall of
the cliff shelter known as
Cap-Blanc. The actual
length of each of these
sculptures is about seven
feet. After Lalanne and
Breuil.

The procession of six horses cut in limestone under the sheltering cliff of
Cap-Blanc is by far the most imposing work of Magdalenian art that has
been discovered. The sculptures are in high relief and of large size and are
in excellent proportion; they appear to represent the high-bred type of desert
or Celtic horse, related to the Arabian, so far as we can judge from the long,
straight face, the slender nose, the small nostrils, and the massive angle of
the lower jaw; the ears are rather long and pointed, and the tail is
represented as thin and without hair; they were found partly buried by
layers containing implements of middle Magdalenian industry, and they are
therefore assigned to an early Magdalenian date in which animal sculpture
in the round reached its climax.

Page 541

Fig. 235. Head of a horse
sculptured on a reindeer
antler, from the
Magdalenian layer of
Mas d'Azil on the right
bank of the Arize. After
Piette. Actual size.

Page 542

Fig. 236. Statuette carved on a
fragment of mammoth
tusk, representing a
horse of Celtic type with
mane erect, from the
grotto of Les
Espelugues, Lourdes.
After Piette. About one
and one-third actual size.

From the early to the middle Magdalenian period animal sculpture in bone,
horn, and ivory was followed as decorative art in a bold and highly
naturalistic manner. Adaptation of the animal figure to the surface and to the
material employed is nowhere shown in a more remarkable way than in the
bâtons, the dart-throwers, and the poniards. Of all the work of the Upper
Palæolithic, these decorative heads and bodies are, perhaps, the most highly
artistic creations in the modern sense. The famous horse found in the late
Magdalenian levels of Mas d'Azil (Fig. 235) and the small horses from the
grotto of Espelugues, of the middle Magdalenian, are full of movement and
life and show such certainty and breadth of treatment that they must be

Page 543

regarded as the masterpieces of Upper Palæolithic glyptic art. The ibex
carved on the dart-thrower from the grotto of Mas d'Azil (Fig. 178)
indicates observation and a striking power of expression; while all the
details are noted, the treatment is very broad.

Fig. 237. Head of a woman
with head-dress
sculptured in ivory, from
the Magdalenian levels
of Brassempouy. After
Piette. One and one-fifth
actual size.

The continuation of animal sculpture in the round is seen in the well-known
horse statuette from the grotto of Lourdes; the partly decorative striping is a
step in the direction of conventional treatment. The sculptured reindeer

Page 544

discovered by Bégouen in the grotto of Enlène is treated in a somewhat
similar style.
Small human figurines again appear in the form of statuettes in bone or
ivory, representing the renaissance of the spirit of human sculpture. Some of
this work is apparently in search of beauty and with altogether different
motives from the repellent feminine statuettes of middle and late
Aurignacian times, for the subjects are slender and the limbs are modelled
with relative skill. As in the earlier works, there is a partial failure to portray
the features, which is in striking contrast to the lifelike treatment of animal
heads. Very few examples of this work have been found, and most of them
have been broken. To this period belong the Venus statuette of Laugerie
Basse and the head of a girl carved in ivory found at Brassempouy (Fig.
237) with the features fairly suggested and an elaborate head-dress.

Geographic Distribution of the Magdalenian Culture
In Magdalenian times the Crô-Magnon race undoubtedly reached its highest
development and its widest geographic distribution, but it would be a
mistake to infer that the boundaries of the Magdalenian culture also mark
the extreme migration points of this nomadic people, because the industries
and inventions may well have spread far beyond the areas actually inhabited
by the race itself.
Absence of Magdalenian influence around the northerly coasts of the
Mediterranean is certainly one of the most surprising facts. Breuil has
suggested that Italy remained in an Aurignacian stage of development
throughout Magdalenian times and indicates that there is much evidence
that Magdalenian culture never penetrated into this peninsula, for in Italy
the Aurignacian industrial stage is succeeded by traces of the Azilian. This
geographic gap, however, may be filled at any time by a fresh discovery. In
Spain, also, the Magdalenian culture is known only in the Cantabrian
Mountains, but never farther south, one of the earliest sites found in this
region being the grotto of Peña la Miel, visited by Lartet in 1865, and one
of the most famous the cavern of Altamira, discovered by Sautuola in 1875;
to the northeast is the station of Banyolas. So far the eastern provinces of
Spain have not yielded any implements of engraved or sculptured bone.

Page 545

Larger Image

Fig. 238. Geographic
distribution of the
principal Magdalenian
industrial stations in
western Europe.

In contrast to this failure to reach southward, the Magdalenian culture is
widely extended through France, Belgium, England, Germany, Switzerland,
Austria, and as far east as Russia. It would appear either that the men of
Magdalenian times wandered far and wide or that there was an extensive
system of barter, because the discovery of shells brought for personal
adornment from the Mediterranean seashores to various Magdalenian sites

Page 546

in France and in central Europe seems to indicate a wide-spread intercourse
among these nomadic hunters and a system of trade reaching from the
coasts of the Mediterranean and the Atlantic to the valley of the Neckar in
Germany and along the Danube in Lower Austria. Another proof of this
intercourse is the wide distribution not only of similar forms of implements
but of very similar decorations; as an instance, Breuil notes the likeness of
schematic engravings on reindeer horn in the two primitive Magdalenian
layers of Placard, Charente, to those found in the Polish cavern of
Mas̆ zycka, near Ojcow, and to others in the corresponding layers of
Castillo, near Santander, of Solutré on the Saône, and of various sites in
Dordogne. A very distinctive geometric decoration on bone is that of broken
zigzag lines with little intercalated transverse lines, which we notice at
Altamira, in northern Spain, and which also occurs here and there in
Dordogne and in Charente and extends to the grottos of d'Arlay in the Jura.
Another style of ornament, with deep pectinate and punctuate lines, found
in the very ancient Magdalenian of Placard, also occurs in the most ancient
layers of Kesslerloch, Switzerland. Spiral ornaments like those on the bone
weapons of Dordogne, of Arudy, and of Lourdes are found at Hornos de la
Peña, in the Cantabrian Mountains. The spread of analogous decoration is
still more striking when we find it occurring in the details of sculpture or in
a certain type of dart-thrower (propulseur), which extended from the
Pyrenees eastward to the Lake of Constance. Inventions like that of the
harpoon and fashions like those of the decorative motifs were carried from
point to point.
This influence does not lead to identity. Some of the phases of art and of
decoration are confined to certain localities; for example, the engravings of
deer on the bone shoulder-blades in the caverns near Santander, Spain, are
not duplicated in France; also there are numerous local styles witnessed in
the forms and decorations of the javelin, the lance, and the harpoon; these
variations, however, do not conceal the element of community of culture
and of similar fluctuations of industry and art between widely distant
stations.
Many Magdalenian stations were crowded around the sheltered cliffs of
Dordogne (Fig. 238). Besides these, we observe the Magdalenian sites of
Champs, Ressaulier, and the grotto of Combo-Negro in Corrèze; south of
Dordogne and Corrèze are other stations along the Garonne and the Adour.

Page 547

Some of the finest examples of Magdalenian art have come from Bruniquel,
on the Aveyron, near the boundary between Tarn-et-Garonne and Tarn,
where no less than four important sites have been excavated.

Fig. 239. Necklace of marine
shells, from the cave of
Crô-Magnon, mostly
periwinkles, some
related to species now
living in the North Sea,
Purpura, Turitella, and
Fusus. After E. Lartet.
The Crô-Magnon grotto

Page 548

dwellers used shells
belonging to existing
species, while in the
deposits at La Madeleine
and Laugerie Basse
fossil shells are found.
The use of seashore
shells as ornaments in
various parts of the
interior of Europe
indicates that they were
brought long distances in
trade. The remains of
such ornaments were
found with the skeleton
of Aurignacian age from
Paviland, Wales.
Necklaces were also
made of small plates of
ivory and the perforated
teeth of the cave-bear.
One-third actual size.

The culture map of France in Magdalenian times is covered from north to
south with these ancient camp sites, either clustered along the river borders,
where erosion has created shelters, or in the great outcrops of limestone
along the northern slopes of the Pyrenees, where the exposure of the
limestone has led to the formation of grottos and caverns, or on the plateaus
where game abounded or flint could be found for the rapidly declining flint
industry. Near the Gulf of Lyons are the stations of Bise, Tournal,
Narbonne, and Crouzade; extending westward toward the headwaters of the
Ariège are La Vache, Massat, and the great tunnel station of Mas d'Azil,
formed by the River Arize; here the Magdalenian levels discovered by
Piette have yielded some of the most notable Magdalenian works of art,
including animal statuettes, bas-reliefs, and engravings with incised
contours.

Page 549

Farther west, on the headwaters of the Garonne, is Gourdan, where Piette
began his remarkable excavations in 1871 and discovered two of the ancient
Magdalenian phases of sculpture; then comes the more westerly group of
Aurensan, Lorthet, and Lourdes, the latter a grotto which has yielded one of
the finest examples of the horse sculptured in ivory, and which has since
become famous as the site of a miracle and of modern pilgrimage. Between
the Garonne and the Bay of Biscay lie the stations of Duruthy and the
Grotte du Pape of Brassempouy, the latter occupied in Magdalenian times,
but best known as a centre of late Aurignacian sculpture of statuettes.
To the northeast, in the very heart of the mountainous region of Auvergne,
is the station of Neschers, where a flow of lava from Mount Tartaret
descended over the slopes of Mont-Doré and covered a Mousterian
industrial deposit with its mammoth fauna and then, after a lapse of time,
became the site of a Magdalenian industrial camp, so that Boule has been
able to determine the geologic age of the most recent volcanic eruptions in
France, those of the Monts d'Auvergne, as having occurred between the
periods of Mousterian and Magdalenian industry.
In view of the frequent occurrence of Aurignacian and Solutrean camps as
well as of Neolithic stations in southeastern France, we are surprised at the
extreme rarity there of Magdalenian flint implements. However, Capitan
has recognized a Magdalenian station at Solutré, near the headwaters of the
Saône, and not far from this site is the station of Goulaine, which has
yielded an enormous flint scraper or anvil, the largest Upper Palæolithic
implement ever found; it is carefully chipped around the entire curved edge
and weighs over 4¼ pounds. To the north of the Dordogne is the celebrated
grotto of Placard, in Charente, where the dawn of the Magdalenian industry
has been discovered, and again directly north of this is the grotto of
Chaffaud, at Savigné, where the first engraved bone of the 'Reindeer Age'
was discovered in 1834; not far from this is the shelter of Garenne, near St.
Marcel (Indre), which has afforded a fine figure of a galloping reindeer.

Page 550

Larger Image

Fig. 240. Geographic
distribution of the
Magdalenian and other
Palæolithic stations on
the upper waters of the
Rhine and of the
Danube. The chief
Magdalenian stations
are: Andernach,
Bockstein, Buchenloch,
Gansersfelsen, Höhlefels
bei Hütten, Höhlefels bei
Schelklingen, Hohlestein,

Page 551

Kartstein,
Kastlhänghöhle,
Kesslerloch,
Martinshöhle,
Munzingen, Niedernau,
Oberlarg, Ofnet,
Propstfels,
Schmiechenfels,
Schussenquelle,
Schweizersbild,
Sirgenstein, Strassberg,
Wildhaus, Wildscheuer,
and Winterlingen. After
R. R. Schmidt, modified
and redrawn.

These geographic and artistic records are of intense interest as carrying the
Périgord or Dordogne culture northward. Somewhat to the east, on the
headwaters of the Cure, a tributary of the Yonne, there is an important
group including over sixty open shelters formed in the Jurassic limestone,
in which characteristic Magdalenian bone implements have been found. Of
these the most famous are the Grotte des Fées, and the Grotte du Trilobite,
both of which were first entered by the Neanderthals in Mousterian times
and were again sought by the Crô-Magnons in Magdalenian times. Passing
still farther north, the Crô-Magnons visited the borders of the Somme and
sought the historic flint station of St. Acheul, which had been frequented by
races of men for thousands of years previous, back to Pre-Chellean times.
To the northeast are the stations of Belgium, chiefly made known through
the labors of Dupont, distributed along the valleys of the Lesse and of the
Meuse and yielding characteristic Magdalenian flints as well as a number of
engravings on bone. We may be sure that this region was under Crô-
Magnon rule and that their control extended over into Britain, where, it will
be recalled, a Crô-Magnon skeleton was found at Paviland, in western
Wales. Here, again, in Magdalenian times the Crô-Magnon race was
probably wide-spread over southern Britain. At Bacon's Hole, near

Page 552

Swansea, Wales, there is a wall decoration consisting of ten red bands,
which, according to Breuil and Sollas, may possibly be of Palæolithic age.
More definite is the Magdalenian industry observed at the Cresswell Crags,
in Derbyshire; while near Torquay, Devonshire, is the famous station of
Kent's Hole, discovered in 1824, in which a bone needle has been found and
several harpoons with double rows of barbs belonging to the late
Magdalenian industry.

Fig. 241. Reindeer engraved
around a piece of
reindeer antler, from
Kesslerloch,
Switzerland. This is a
unique instance of the
portrayal of landscape in
Palæolithic art. After
Heim. Slightly more than

Page 553

three-quarters actual
size.

In Germany, whereas only three Solutrean stations have been discovered,
(29) there are no less than fourteen Magdalenian stations to attest the wide
spread of that culture. Thus the favorite grotto of Sirgenstein, near the
centre of the Magdalenian stations on the upper waters of the Danube,
although abandoned in Solutrean times, was again entered by man during
the early Magdalenian culture stage. Coincident with the return of man to
this great grotto was the arrival of the banded lemming (Myodes torquatus),
the herald of the cold tundra wave of life in the far north. At the very same
time man with the banded lemming arrived at Schweizersbild, near the
Lake of Constance; at a slightly earlier period, with the dawn of
Magdalenian culture, man entered the sister station of Kesslerloch. It
certainly appears that a cold moist climate accompanying the Bühl advance
influenced all the Crô-Magnon peoples of this region just north of the
Alpine glaciers and compelled them to seek the grottos and shelters. There
are, however, some open stations in this general region, for example, at
Schussenried, Württemberg; the Magdalenian culture layer is not found in a
grotto, but lies under a deposit of peat mingled with the remains of the
reindeer, horse, brown bear, and wolf. Again, among the best-known sites
along the middle Rhine is the open-air station of Andernach. Demonstrating
the eastward distribution of the art of engraving on ivory and bone is the
presence in Andernach and in the grotto of Wildscheuer, near Steeten, on
the Lahn, of engravings of this character. Thus far these are the only
German stations in which such engravings have been found.
Of especial interest also is the open Magdalenian 'loess' station of
Munzingen, on the upper Rhine, because it proves that the highest layers of
the 'upper loess,' corresponding with the dry or steppe period of climate,
were contemporaneous with the advanced or late Magdalenian industry,
also because this final 'upper loess' stage about corresponds with the period
when the last of the arctic tundra mammals began to abandon central
Europe. It was at this critical geologic time that the late Magdalenian
culture began to draw to a close. Kesslerloch, Switzerland, has yielded a
considerable number of engravings on bone, including one of the finest

Page 554

examples of a browsing reindeer (Fig. 241), and Schweizersbild also has
yielded a considerable number of rather crude engravings.
Frequented in Magdalenian times was that part of the Swabian Jura lying
between the headwaters of the Neckar and of the Danube; along the course
of the Danube, from Propstfels, near Beuron, in the southwest, to Ofnet, in
the northeast, extend the other stations of Höhlefels bei Hütten,
Schmiechenfels, and Bocksteinhöhle.
West of the Danube the industry was carried into the present region of
Bavaria, as indicated by the recent discovery of Kastlhäng.(30) Here,
beginning with the early Magdalenian (Gourdanien inférieur of the French
school) and extending to the middle or high Magdalenian (Gourdanien
supérieur), we find a complete series of Magdalenian stations; the middle
Magdalenian layer is of exactly the same type as that found in the Abri
Mège of Dordogne and in the lower levels of the Grotte de la Mairie; the
same culture stage is again observed in southern Germany in the stations of
Schussenquelle and of Höhlefels, and it extends eastward into Austria in the
station of Gudenushöhle as well as into several Moravian stations, for
example, that of Kostelík.
These facts are of extraordinary interest, for they show that the civilization,
such as it was, of the Upper Palæolithic was very widely extended. This
marks an important social characteristic, namely, the readiness and
willingness to take advantage of every step in human progress, wherever it
may have originated. At this point, therefore, it is interesting to compare the
Magdalenian industry of Germany with that of France.(31) Germany shows
the same technical and stylistic tendencies and the same evolutionary
direction as France. The mammalian life was, of course, the same in both
countries, for in each region the giant types of mammals still survived, and
the banded lemming of the arctic appears in the sheltered valleys of the
Dordogne as well as in Belgium and in Germany. The vicissitudes of
climate were undoubtedly the same; we observe the alternation of cold
moist climate in the early Magdalenian along the upper Danube as well as
in the early Magdalenian of the type station of La Madeleine, Dordogne.
Again, we observe the transition into the dry cold climate in the steppe
character of the fauna both along the upper Rhine, at Munzingen, and also
beneath the shelter station of La Madeleine, as recorded by Peyrony.

Page 555

More vital still for this community of industrial culture was the community
of race, for at Obercassel we find the same Crô-Magnon type as that
discovered beneath the sheltering cliffs of Dordogne. It appears probable
that the inventions of the central region of Dordogne travelled eastward
when we note the fact that none of the prototypes of early forms of the
harpoon which were common in southern France occur in any of the
stations of central Europe, but the single-rowed harpoon is characteristic of
the middle Magdalenian all over Germany. Other primitive Magdalenian
bone implements, such as the bone spear point with the cleft base, the
bâtons, and the needles, are also of rare occurrence in the German stations.
In late Magdalenian times, however, a complete community of culture is
established, for the industry of both countries in flint and bone appears to be
very similar: flint microliths appear in increasing number and variety;
beside the small flint flakes with blunted backs, numerous feather-shaped
flakes of Pre-Tardenoisian type are found, as well as the types of graving
flints. Some specialties of French Magdalenian culture did not find their
way into Germany; for example, the graver of the 'parrot-beak' type has
been found in France but has not been traced far eastward. In both
countries, however, are found upper Magdalenian chisels of reindeer horn
and perfected bone needles, bâtons, and harpoons with double rows of
barbs. On the other hand, works of art and decorative designs in horn and
bone are almost entirely wanting in German localities, with the exception of
the stations of Andernach and Wildscheuer previously mentioned. In late
Magdalenian times, both in Germany and France, we find the Eurasiatic
forest fauna becoming more abundant.

Page 556

Fig. 242. Entrance to the
grotto of Kesslerloch,
near Lake Constance.
Photograph by N. C.
Nelson.

Page 557

Fig. 243. The famous shelter
station of
Schweizersbild, under a
protecting cliff of
limestone, near Lake
Constance, Switzerland.
On the right stands Dr.
Jakob Nüesch, who has
devoted three years to
the excavation and study
of this site. Photograph
by N. C. Nelson.

Page 558

The two famous Swiss stations of Kesslerloch and Schweizersbild, near
Lake Constance, appear throughout Magdalenian times to have been in very
close touch with the cultural advances of Dordogne. Kesslerloch(32) has
yielded 12,000 flints of small dimensions, resembling in their succession
those of the type station of La Madeleine; also needles, single and double
harpoons, dart-throwers, bâtons, as well as the fine engravings mentioned
above; bone sculpture is represented here in the unique head of a musk-ox
(Ovibos moschatus), in carvings of the reindeer and of other animals on the
batons and weapons of the chase. Kesslerloch lies on the edge of a
moderately wide valley, traversed by a brook; in this sheltered, well-
watered, hilly region, the trees flourished and harbored the forest animals,
while the glaciers, retreating and leaving damp and stony areas, were
closely followed by the tundra fauna; the woolly rhinoceros and mammoth
persisted here longer than in other parts of Europe; the horse of Kesslerloch
is said to show resemblances to the Przewalski horse of the desert of Gobi,
in central Asia, and is consequently referred to the steppe type. The
development of the flints takes place step by step with that of the sister
cavern of Schweizersbild, and in early Magdalenian times these flints are
found associated with the arrival of the great migration of the arctic tundra
rodents, the banded lemmings (Myodes torquatus). A hearth with ashes and
coals and many charred bones of old and young mammals, including the
woolly rhinoceros, has been found here; the animal life altogether includes
twenty-five species of mammals, among them the woolly mammoth, woolly
rhinoceros, reindeer, and lion.
Less than four miles distant from Kesslerloch, in a small valley about two
miles north of Schaffhausen, is the other famous Swiss station of
Schweizersbild. The Crô-Magnons were attracted to this spot by the
protecting cliff of isolated limestone rock rising sheer from the meadow-
land, at the base of which is a shelter facing southwest, with an entrance of
about 30 feet in height, commanding a wide view of the distant valley. In
the accumulations at the base of this shelter we find a complete prehistory
of the human, industrial, faunal, and climatic changes of this region of
Switzerland from early Magdalenian into Neolithic times. It was not until
the true early Magdalenian, after both the Aurignacian and Solutrean stages
had closed, that man first found his way here during the Bühl advance, the
period of the deposition of the Upper Rodent Layer with its cold arctic and

Page 559

steppe fauna;(33) but from this time the grotto was occupied at intervals until
full Neolithic times. The beginning of these industrial deposits is estimated
by Nüesch as having occurred between 24,000 and 29,000 years ago, but
we have adopted a somewhat lower and more conservative estimate. In
descending order the various layers of this shelter, as studied by Nüesch, are
as follows:

Section of the Schweizersbild Deposits
Neolithic
6. Layer of humous earth, between 15 and 19 inches in
thickness, containing Neolithic implements.
5. Gray culture layer, about 15 inches in thickness, including
many fire-hearths, ornaments of shell, polished Neolithic flints,
and unglazed pottery. The true forest fauna includes the brown
bear, badger, marten, wolf, fox, beaver, hare, squirrel, short-
horned wild ox (Bos taurus brachyceros), and reindeer, also the
domesticated goat and sheep.
Upper Palæolithic
4. Thin layer of forest-living rodents, principally squirrels. Split
bones and worked flints; no carvings in bone or horn; industry
of late Magdalenian or close of Magdalenian Upper Palæolithic
age; evidences that climate was changing, steppe conditions
passing away, and forests becoming more dominant; only a few
steppe species; the forest species include the reindeer, hare, pika,
squirrel, ermine, and marten.
3. Yellow culture layer, steppe period, rich in fire-hearths and
yielding 14,000 flints of middle [? and late] Magdalenian age;
engravings on reindeer antlers, ornaments of shells and teeth.
Mixed fauna with steppe and forest types predominant; of the
few tundra forms, reindeer very abundant and also arctic fox,
but banded lemming and other tundra types entirely lacking;
steppe and desert fauna includes the kiang, Persian maral deer,

Page 560

Pallas's cat (Felis manul), steppe horse, and steppe suslik; of
alpine type, the ibex; numerous forest species, pine marten,
beaver, squirrel, red deer, roe-deer, and wild boar.
2. Arctic tundra rodent layer, 20 inches in thickness; period of
the Bühl Postglacial advance; the banded lemming (Myodes
torquatus) most abundant, mingled with early Magdalenian flint
and bone implements; one fire-hearth; abundant tundra fauna,
including all tundra types except the Obi lemming, and the
musk-ox (Ovibos moschatus) which is found in Kesslerloch;
indications of a very cold, moist climate; the banded lemming,
arctic fox, arctic hare, reindeer, wolverene, ermine, also such
forest forms as the wolf, fox, bear, weasel, and a number of
northern birds.
1. Gravel bed and old river deposit, recognized by Boule as
belonging to the moraines of the fourth glaciation.
This wonderful deposit of human artifacts and animal remains gives us a
complete registration of the changes of climate in this region accompanying
the changes of culture and the development of the Magdalenian race.
Turning our survey to the course of the Danube, we note that several
Magdalenian stations extend into the provinces of Lower Austria, chief
among them being both the open 'loess' station of Aggsbach, and that of
Gobelsburg; there is also the Hundssteig near Krems, better known as the
station of Krems, and the cavern known as the Gudenushöhle; in the latter
station the characteristic bâtons, javelins, and bone needles have been
found.[BB]

Page 561

Fig. 244. The open loess
station of Aggsbach, on
the Danube, near Krems.
After Obermaier.

The cavern district of Moravia attracted a relatively large population, and
among the numerous stations are the grottos of Kr̆ íz̆ , Žitný, Kostelík,
Bycis̆ kala, Schoschuwka, Balcarovaskala, Kůlna, and Lautsch. Near the
Russian border bone implements like those of Gudenushöhle on the Danube
have been found at the station of Kůlna, and the industrial stratification of
Šipka is very clear. Not far from Cracow, across the Russian border, the
caverns in the region of Ojcow were entered by men carrying the
Magdalenian culture. Another site in Russia is the grotto of Mas̆ zycka, and
characteristic Magdalenian harpoons, needles, and bâtons de

Page 562

commandement with other implements have also been found to the
eastward, in the neighborhood of Kiev, in the Ukraine.

Decline of the Magdalenian Culture
The highest point touched by the Crô-Magnon race in the middle or high
Magdalenian appears to correspond broadly with the cold arid period of
climate in the interval between the Bühl and Gschnitz advances in the
Alpine region, during which the steppe mammals spread widely over
southwestern Europe. The saiga antelope, for example, a highly
characteristic steppe type, is represented in one of the most skilful bone
carvings found in the late Magdalenian layers of Mas d'Azil; also the steppe
type of horse is frequently represented in the most advanced engravings of
late Magdalenian times. How far this cold, relatively dry climate influenced
the artistic and creative energy of the Crô-Magnons is largely a matter of
conjecture. The entirely independent records of La Madeleine, of
Schweizersbild, and of Kesslerloch concur in associating the highest stage
of Magdalenian history of art with the predominance of the steppe fauna
and evidences of a cold dry climate. That the mammoth still abounded is
seen in the mammoth engravings which are superposed on those of the
bison in Font-de-Gaume.

Page 563

Larger Image

Fig. 245. Front and side views
of a saiga antelope
carved upon a bone dart-
thrower from the
Magdalenian deposits of
Mas d'Azil. After Piette.

The succeeding life period is that of the retreat of the tundra and steppe
mammals and of the increasing rarity of the reindeer and of the mammoth
in southwestern Europe; it corresponds broadly with the returning cold and
moist climate of the second Postglacial advance known in the Alps as the
Gschnitz stage. With the spread of the forests and the retreat to the north of

Page 564

the reindeer, the principal source both of the supply of food and clothing
and of all the bone implements of industry and of the chase, a new set of
life conditions may have gradually become established. If it is true, as most
students of geographical conditions and of the climate maintain, that Europe
at the same time became more densely forested, the chase may have
become more difficult, and the Crô-Magnons may have begun to depend
more and more upon the life of the streams and the art of fishing. It is
generally agreed that the harpoons were chiefly used for fishing and that
many of the microlithic flints, which now begin to appear more abundantly,
may have been attached to a shaft for the same purpose. We know that
similar microliths were used as arrow points in predynastic Egypt.
Breuil(35) observes very significant industrial changes in closing
Magdalenian times: first, the beginning of small geometric forms of flints
suggesting the Tardenoisian types; second, the occasional use of stag horn
in place of reindeer horn; third, a modification in the form of bone
implements toward the patterns of Azilian times; fourth, the rapid decline—
one may almost say sudden disappearance—of the artistic spirit. Schematic
and conventional designs begin to take the place of the free realistic art of
the middle Magdalenian.
Thus the decline of the Crô-Magnons as a powerful race may have been due
partly to environmental causes and the abandonment of their vigorous
nomadic mode of life, or it may be that they had reached the end of a long
cycle of psychic development, which we have traced from the beginning of
Aurignacian times. We know as a parallel that in the history of many
civilized races a period of great artistic and industrial development may be
followed by a period of stagnation and decline without any apparent
environmental causes.

Crô-magnon Descendants in Modern Europe
We might attribute this great change, which affected all of western Europe,
to the extinction of the Crô-Magnon race were it not for the existing
evidence that the race survived throughout the Azilian-Tardenoisian or close
of the Upper Palæolithic. On the close of the Palæolithic the race broke up
throughout western Europe into many colonies, which can perhaps be

Page 565

traced into Neolithic and even into recent times. The anatomical evidence
for this survival theory chiefly consists of the highly characteristic form of
the head.
In Europe a very broad face and a long, narrow cranium is such an
infrequent combination that anthropologists maintain that it affords a means
of identifying the descendants of the prehistoric Crô-Magnon race wherever
they persist to-day. Since Dordogne was the geographic centre of the race in
Upper Palæolithic times, is it merely a coincidence that Dordogne is still the
centre of a similar type? Ripley(36) has given us a valuable résumé of our
present knowledge of this subject. The most significant trait of the long-
headed people of Dordogne is that in many cases the face is almost as broad
as in the normal Alpine round-headed type; in other words, it is strongly
disharmonic; in profile the back part of the head rises and in front view the
head is narrowed at the top; the skull is very low-vaulted; the brow ridges
are prominent; the nose is well formed; the cheek-bones are prominent, and
the powerful cheek muscles give a peculiarly rugged cast to the
countenance. The appearance, however, is not repellent, but more often
open and kindly. The men are of medium height, but very susceptible to
environment as regards stature; they are tall in fertile places, and stunted in
less prosperous districts. They are not degenerate at all, but keen and alert
of mind. The present people of Dordogne agree with but one other type of
men known to anthropologists, namely, the ancient Crô-Magnon race. The
geographical evidence that here in Dordogne we have to do with the
survivors of the real Crô-Magnon race seems to be sustained by a
comparison of the characteristics of the prehistoric skulls found at Crô-
Magnon, Laugerie Basse, and elsewhere in Dordogne, with the heads of the
types of to-day. The cranial indices of the prehistoric skulls, varying from
70 per cent to 73 per cent, correspond with indices of the living head of 72
per cent to 75 per cent. None of the people of Dordogne are quite so long-
headed as this, the average index of the living head in an extreme district
being 76 per cent; but within the whole population there are much lower
indices.
The probability of direct descent becomes stronger when we consider the
disharmonic low-skulled shape of the Crô-Magnon head and the remarkable
elongation of the skull at the back. In the prehistoric Crô-Magnons the
brows were strongly developed, the eye orbits low, the chin prominent. The

Page 566

facial type has been characterized by de Quatrefages(37) as follows: "The
eye depressed beneath the orbital vault; the nose straight rather than arched;
the lips somewhat thick, the jaw and the cheek-bones strongly developed,
the complexion very brown, the hair very dark and growing low on the
forehead—a whole which, without being attractive, was in no way
repulsive."
In southern France we observe a continuity not only of the head form but of
the prevalence of black hair and eyes. Why should this Crô-Magnon type
have survived at this point and have disappeared elsewhere? In order to
consider the particular cause of this persistence of a Palæolithic race, we
must, with Ripley, broaden our horizon, and consider the whole southwest
from the Mediterranean to Brittany as a unit.
The survival is partly attributed to favorable geographical environment and
partly to geological and racial barriers. On the north the intrusion of the
Teutonic race was shut off and competition was narrowed down to the Crô-
Magnon and Alpine types.
If the people of Dordogne are veritable survivors of the Crô-Magnons of the
Upper Palæolithic, they certainly represent the oldest living race in western
Europe, and is it not extremely significant that the most primitive language
in Europe, that of the Basques of the northern Pyrenees, is spoken near by,
only 200 miles to the southwest? Is there possibly a connection between the
original language of the Crô-Magnons, a race which once crowded the
region of the Cantabrian Mountains and the Pyrenees, and the existing
agglutinative language of the Basques, which is totally different from all the
European tongues? This hypothesis, suggested by Ripley,(38) is very well
worth considering, for it is not inconceivable that the ancestors of the
Basques conquered the Crô-Magnons and subsequently acquired their
language.
The prehistoric Crô-Magnon men would seem, therefore, to have remained
in or near their early settlements through all the changes of time and the
vicissitudes of history. "It is, perhaps," observes Ripley, "the most striking
instance known of a persistency of population unchanged through
thousands of years."

Page 567

The geographic extension of this race was once very much wider than it is
to-day. The classical skull of Engis, Belgium, belongs to this type. It has
been traced from Alsace in the east to the Atlantic in the west. Ranke asserts
that it is to be found to-day in the hills of Thuringia, and that it was a
prevalent type there in the past. Verneau considers that it was the type
prevailing among the extinct Guanches of the Canary Islands. Collignon(39)
has identified it in northern Africa, and regards the Crô-Magnons as a
subvariety of the Mediterranean race, an opinion consistent at least with the
archæological evidence that this race came into Europe with the
Aurignacian culture, which was circum-Mediterranean in distribution.
Traces of Crô-Magnon head formation are found among the living Berbers.
At present, however, this race is believed to survive only in a few isolated
localities, namely, in Dordogne, at a small spot in Landes, near the Garonne
in southern France, and at Lannion in Brittany, where nearly one-third of
the population is of the Crô-Magnon type. It is said to survive on the island
of Oléron off the west coast of France, and there is evidence of similar
descent to be found among the people of the islands of northern Holland.
The people of Trysil, on the Scandinavian peninsula, are characterized as
having disharmonic features, possibly representing an outcrop of the Crô-
Magnon type.
Our interest in the fate of the Crô-Magnons is so great that the Guanche
theory may also be considered; it is known to be favored by many
anthropologists: von Behr, von Luschan, Mehlis, and especially by Verneau.
The Guanches were a race of people who formerly spread all over the
Canary Islands and who preserved their primitive characteristics even after
their conquest by Spain in the fifteenth century. The differences from the
supposed modern Crô-Magnon type may be mentioned first. The skin of the
Guanches is described by the poet Viana as light-colored, and Verneau
considers that the hair was blond or light chestnut and the eyes blue; the
coloring, however, is somewhat conjectural. The features of resemblance to
the ancient Crô-Magnons are numerous. The minimum stature of the men
was 5 feet 7 inches, and the maximum 6 feet 7 inches; in one locality the
average male stature was over 6 feet. The women were comparatively
small. The most striking characters of the head were the fine forehead, the
extremely long skull, and the pentagonal form of the cranium, when seen
from above, caused by the prominence of the parietals—a Crô-Magnon

Page 568

characteristic. Among the insignia of the chiefs was the arm-bone of an
ancestor; the skull also was carefully preserved. The offensive weapons in
warfare consisted of three stones, a club, and several knives of obsidian; the
defensive weapon was a simple lance. The Guanches used wooden swords
with great skill. The habitation of all the people was in large, well-sheltered
caverns, which honeycombed the sides of the mountains; all the walls of
these caverns were decorated; the ceilings were covered with a uniform coat
of red ochre, while the walls were decorated with various geometric designs
in red, black, gray, and white. Hollowed-out stones served as lamps. We
may conclude with Verneau that there is evidence, although not of a very
convincing kind, that the Guanches were related to the Crô-Magnons.(40)
His observations on these supposed Crô-Magnons of the Canary Islands are
cited in the Appendix, Note V. We regret that Verneau in his memoir(41)
does not present his more recent views in regard to the prehistoric
distribution of this great race.

(1) Breuil, 1912.7, p. 203.
(2) Op. cit., p. 205.
(3) James, 1902.1.
(4) Heim, 1894.1, p. 184.
(5) Schmidt, 1912.1, p. 262.
(6) Fraunholz, 1911.1.
(7) Geikie, 1914.1, pp. 25, 26.
(8) Boule, 1899.1.
(9) Breuil, 1912.7, pp. 203-205.
(10) Obermaier, 1912.1, pp. 341, 342.
(11) Martin, R., 1914.1, pp. 15, 16.

Page 569

(12) Verworn, 1914.1.
(13) Op. cit., p. 646.
(14) Breuil, 1912.7, p. 201.
(15) Lartet, 1875.1.
(16) Breuil, 1912.7, p. 213.
(17) Schmidt, 1912.1, p. 136.
(18) Breuil, op. cit., pp. 216, 217.
(19) Breuil, 1909.3.
(20) Op. cit., p. 410.
(21) Cartailhac, 1906.1, pp. 227, 228.
(22) Rivière, 1897.1; 1897.2.
(23) Reinach, 1913.1.
(24) Breuil, 1912.1, p. 202.
(25) Cartailhac, 1908.1.
(26) Capitan, 1908.1, pp. 501-514.
(27) Ibid., 1910.1, pp. 59-132.
(28) Breuil, 1912.1, pp. 196, 197.
(29) Schmidt, 1912.1, p. 116.
(30) Fraunholz, 1911.1.
(31) Schmidt, 1912.1, p. 154.
(32) Déchelette, 1908.1, vol. I, pp. 191-194.
(33) Nehring, 1880.1; 1896.1.
(34) Bayer, 1912.1, pp. 13-21.

Page 570

(35) Breuil, 1912.7, pp. 212, 216.
(36) Ripley, 1899.1, pp. 39, 165, 173, 174-179, 211, 406.
(37) Op. cit., p. 176.
(38) Op. cit., p. 181.
(39) Collignon, 1890.1.
(40) Verneau, 1891.1.
(41) Ibid., 1906.1.

Page 571

CHAPTER VI
CLOSE OF THE OLD STONE AGE—
INVASION OF NEW RACES—
HISTORY OF THE MAS D'AZIL, OF
FÈRE-EN-TARDENOIS—FOREST
ENVIRONMENT AND LIFE—
ORIGIN OF THE AZILIAN-
TARDENOISIAN CULTURE—
CHARACTERS AND CUSTOMS OF
THE NEW RACES—TRANSITION
TO THE NEOLITHIC AND
RELATIONS OF THE OLD AND
NEW RACES—APPARENT CHIEF
LINES OF HUMAN DESCENT AND
OF HUMAN MIGRATION INTO
WESTERN EUROPE.
We have now reached the very close of the Old Stone Age, a period which
is believed to extend between 10,000 and 7,000 years before the present era.
The entrance to the final cultures of the Upper Palæolithic, known as the
Azilian-Tardenoisian, marks a transition even more abrupt than that
witnessed in any preceding stage. It is not a development; it is a revolution.
The artistic spirit entirely disappears; there is no trace of animal engraving
or sculpture; painting is found only on flattened pebbles or in schematic or
geometric designs on wall surfaces. Of bone implements only harpoons and
polishers remain, and even these are of inferior workmanship and without
any trace of art. The flint industry continues the degeneration begun in the
Magdalenian and exhibits a new life and impulse only in the fashioning of
the extremely small or microlithic tools and weapons known as
'Tardenoisian.' Both bone and flint weapons of the chase disappear, yet the
stag is hunted and its horns are used in the manufacture of harpoons. This is
the 'Age of the Stag,' the final stage of the 'Cave Period' in western Europe,
and is subsequent to the 'Age of the Reindeer' in the south.

Page 572

It would appear as if the very same regions formerly occupied by the great
hunting Crô-Magnon race from Aurignacian to Magdalenian times were
now inhabited by a race or races largely employed in fishing. The country is
thickly forested. The climate is still cold and extremely moist, and human
life everywhere is in the grottos or entrances to the caverns.

Invasion of Four New Races in Closing Upper Palæolithic Times
How far this revolution is due to the decline of the Crô-Magnon race and
how far to the invasion of one or more new races is very difficult to
determine in the absence of the anatomical evidence derived from skeletal
remains. Two new races had certainly found their way along the Danube as
shown in the burials of Ofnet, in eastern Bavaria; one is extremely broad-
headed and perhaps of central Asiatic origin, while the other is extremely
long-headed and perhaps of southerly or Mediterranean origin. It is possible
that these two races correspond respectively with the easterly and southerly
industrial influences which are observed in the Azilian-Tardenoisian stage.
The former is the first brachycephalic race to enter western Europe, for it
will be recalled that all the previous races, the Crô-Magnons, the Brünns,
and the Neanderthals, are dolichocephalic. The long-headed race found at
Ofnet is very clearly distinguished from the disharmonic long-headed Crô-
Magnon race by the narrowness of the face; in other words, it is an
harmonic type of head and face, which may have been Mediterranean in
origin, like the so-called 'Mediterranean race' of Sergi.
This fresh invasion of western Europe by two races arriving by one or more
of the great migration routes from the vast Eurasiatic mainland to the east,
races with a relatively high brain development, is certainly one of the most
surprising features of the close of the Palæolithic Period, for we have long
been accustomed to think that these fresh easterly and southerly invasions
began only in Neolithic times.
As the Upper Palæolithic draws to an end, there is, according to Breuil, still
another industrial influence making itself felt: it comes from the northeast
along the shores of the Baltic.

Page 573

Putting together all the fragmentary evidence which we possess, we may
regard western Europe at the close of the Old Stone Age as peopled by four
and possibly by five distinct races, as follows:
5. Arriving late in Palæolithic times, a race along the shores of
the Baltic, known only by its Maglemose industry; possibly a
Teutonic race.
4. A south Mediterranean race, known only by its Tardenoisian
industry, migrating along the northern shores of Africa and
spreading over Spain; with a conventional and schematic art;
probably an advance wave of the true 'Mediterranean' race of
Sergi; possibly identical with race 3 below. (The same as Race
4, p. 278.)
3. A long-headed race found at Ofnet, in eastern Bavaria;
possibly a branch of the true 'Mediterranean' race 4 above, but
not related to the Brünn. (Possibly the same as Race 4.)
2. The newly arriving Furfooz-Grenelle race, broad-headed;
known along the Danube at Ofnet, in eastern Bavaria, and
northward in Belgium; possibly a branch of the 'Alpine' race.
(The same as Race 5, p. 278.)
1. The surviving Crô-Magnons, in a stage of industrial decline,
pursuing the Azilian industry, probably inhabiting France and
northern Spain.
The broad-headed Ofnet race mentioned above is apparently the same as the
Furfooz-Grenelle race, and may also correspond with the existing Alpine-
Celtic race of western Europe. The long-headed race of Ofnet may
correspond with the existing 'Mediterranean' race of Sergi.
The presence of the Crô-Magnon race in western Europe during Azilian-
Tardenoisian times is not sustained, so far as we know, by any anatomical
evidence, but is suggested by the mode of burial of two skeletons found by
Piette in the Azilian deposits of the station of Mas d'Azil. This burial, like
that of Ofnet, is typical of Upper Palæolithic and not of Neolithic times.
These skeletons lay in the 'Azilian' layer (VI) described below. As the
smaller bones were missing, Piette concluded that the remains had been for

Page 574

some time exposed to the weather before burial, and that the larger bones
had been scraped and cleaned with flint knives, and then colored red with
oxide of iron before interment. According to other authorities, the traces of
scraping and cleaning are doubtful; there can be no question, however, that
the separation of the bones of the skeleton and the use of coloring matter
constitute strong evidence that this Azilian burial was the work of members
of the Crô-Magnon race.
In addition to what we have said as to the survival of the Crô-Magnon race
in the preceding chapter, the opinion of Cartailhac(1) may be cited: "The
race of Crô-Magnon is well determined. There is no doubt about their high
stature, and Topinard is not the only one who believes that they were
blonds. We have traced them through the 'Reindeer Period' into the
Neolithic Epoch, where they were widely distributed and positively related
either to the ancient or actual populations of modern France, being
especially characteristic of our region [France] and of the western
Mediterranean. While the race of Crô-Magnon predominated in the south
and in the west, that of Furfooz predominated in the northeast of France and
in Belgium. These brachycephals were probably brown-haired or of dark
coloring."
But before observing further the characters of these four or five races, let us
examine their industries.

Discovery of the Azilian Type Station
As remarked above, it is believed that these industries prevailed between
7,000 and 10,000 years before our era, that is, between the close of
Magdalenian times and the beginning of the Neolithic or New Stone Age.
This transition period corresponds with the interval in which the Azilian-
Tardenoisian culture swept all over western Europe and completely
replaced the Magdalenian. From Castillo in the Cantabrian Mountains of
northern Spain to Ofnet on the upper Danube there is a complete
replacement by this new culture. The Magdalenian culture does not linger
anywhere; it is totally eliminated; the suddenness of the change both in the
animal life and in the industry is nowhere more clearly indicated than at the
type station of Mas d'Azil in southern France, which may now be described.

Page 575

In 1887 Edouard Piette commenced his exploration of the deposits in the
great cavern of Mas d'Azil. This station takes its name from the little hamlet
of Mas d'Azil in the foot-hills of the Pyrenees about forty miles southwest
from Toulouse. Here the River Arize winds for a quarter of a mile through a
lofty natural tunnel traversed by the highway from St. Girons to
Carcassonne. A rich layer of Magdalenian deposits first attracted Piette's
attention, and he found here some of the finest examples of late
Magdalenian art, but above these deposits he discovered a hitherto
unrecognized industrial stage, to which he gave the name Azilian. The
Azilian layers yielded over one thousand specimens of flattened and
double-barbed harpoons made of the horns of the stag, thus widely differing
from the late Magdalenian harpoons which are rounded and made of the
horns of the reindeer. The entire succession of deposits, as explored by
Piette, is an epitome of the prehistory of Europe from early Magdalenian
times to the Age of Bronze, and should be compared with the successive
deposits of Castillo (p. 164), Sirgenstein (p. 202), Ofnet (p. 476), and
Schweizersbild (p. 447).

Page 576

Fig. 246. Western entrance to
the great station of Mas
d'Azil. "Here the River
Arize winds for a quarter
of a mile through a lofty
natural tunnel traversed
by the highway from St.
Girons to Carcassonne."
Photograph by N. C.
Nelson.

The Mas d'Azil section is as follows:
Prehistoric and Neolithic

Page 577

IX. Iron implements, pottery of the Gauls. At the top Gallo-
Roman remains, glass and glazed pottery.
VIII. Middle Neolithic and Age of Bronze; layer of pottery,
polished stone implements, traces of copper and of bronze.
VII. Dawn of the Neolithic. Fauna includes the horse, urus, stag,
and wild boar. Chipped and polished flints, awls and polishers in
bone; harpoons rare. Beginnings of pottery.
Upper Palæolithic
VI. Azilian, red archæological layer, masses of peroxide of iron.
Extremely moist climate. Broad flat harpoons of stag horn
perforated at the base, numerous flattened and painted pebbles
(galets), flints of degenerate Magdalenian form, especially small
rounded planers and knife flakes, awls and polishers in bone. No
trace of reindeer in the fire-hearths; stag abundant, also roe-deer
and brown bear; wild boar, wild cattle, beaver, a variety of birds.
No trace of polished stone implements. Interred in this layer,
beneath the deposits of streaked cinders and quite undisturbed,
two human skeletons were found, which Piette believed had
been macerated with flints and then colored red with peroxide of
iron.
V. Sterile finely stratified loam layer, a flood deposit of the
River Arize.
IV. Late Magdalenian culture layer; twelve double-rowed
harpoons made of reindeer horn, a few fashioned from stag
horn; numerous engravings and sculptures in bone. Remains of
the reindeer rare in the hearths; those of the royal stag (Cervus
elaphus) abundant.
III. A sterile flood deposit of the River Arize.
II. Middle and Early Magdalenian culture layers, with barbed
harpoons of reindeer horn; flint implements of early
Magdalenian type, bone needles. Bones of the reindeer
abundant.

Page 578

I. Gravel deposits. Interspersed fire-hearths.
The total thickness of these culture deposits is 8.03 m., or 26 feet 4 inches.
The Azilian type layer (VI) containing flat harpoons of stag horn and
painted pebbles, intercalated between the deposits of the Reindeer Age and
the Neolithic layers, is, on account of its stratigraphic position, the most
interesting and instructive of all the sites representing this phase of
transition; and Piette was fully justified in giving to the corresponding
culture period the name of Azilian.(2)
The transformation of art and industry, indicated in the Azilian culture layer,
is as decided as that in the animal life. We observe in this layer no trace of
the animal engravings or sculptures which occur so abundantly in the late
Magdalenian layer below; the use of pigments is confined to the paintings
of schematic or geometric figures on the flattened pebbles. There is no
suggestion of art in any of the bone implements, and the harpoons of stag
horn are rudely fashioned; this type of harpoon appears to be the chief
survivor of the rich variety of implements noted in the Magdalenian layer
below. The stag horn harpoon, moreover, is fashioned with far less skill
than the beautiful Magdalenian harpoons; like them it has two rows of
barbs, but they are not cut with the same delicacy and exactness. As to the
form of the new model, it is explained by the nature of the new material; the
interior of the stag horn being composed of a spongy tissue, could not be
utilized as could the harder and more compact interior of the reindeer horn;
the craftsman, therefore, was obliged to fashion his harpoon out of the
exterior of one side of the stag horn, and in consequence to make it flat.

Page 579

Fig. 247. Typical Azilian
harpoons of stag horn.
After de Mortillet. 287.
A single-rowed harpoon
from Mas d'Azil. 288.
Harpoon with perforated
base from the shelter of
La Tourasse, Haute-
Garonne. 289. Double-
rowed harpoon from the
same shelter. 290. A
similar harpoon with the
barbs alternate instead of
opposite, from Mas
d'Azil. 291. Harpoon
with triangular base and
round perforation from
the Grotte de la Vache,

Page 580

near Tarascon. All one-
third actual size, except
291, which is four-ninths
actual size.

There are no bone needles, no javelins or sagaies; nor are there any of the
beautifully carved weapons of bone. There is also a reduction in the uses to
which the split bones are put, such as the large lissoirs or polishers. The
bone implements appear to be derived from an impoverished late
Aurignacian stage; the same is true of the flint implements, for we observe
a return of the keeled scraper (grattoir caréné). There is also a return of
certain types of graving tools and of the knife-like form of the flake; even
some of the small geometric types of flints resemble those of the
Aurignacian levels.
The many shells of the moisture-loving snail Helix nemoralis, found in the
fire-hearths of Mas d'Azil are proofs of the humidity of the climate, a fact
confirmed by the contemporary flood deposits of the Arize. The frequent
and heavy rains drove the last few representatives of the steppe fauna away
to the north. These climatic conditions favored the formation of peat-bogs,
so frequent to-day in the north of France, and also the growth of vast
forests, inhabited by the stag, which extended over the whole country.
The pebbles of Mas d'Azil are painted on one side with peroxide of iron, a
deposit of which is found in the neighborhood of the cave. The color, mixed
in shells of Pecten, or in hollowed pebbles or on flat stones, was applied
either with the finger or with a brush. The many enigmatic designs consist
chiefly of parallel bands, rows of discs or points, bands with scalloped
edges, cruciform designs, ladder-like patterns (scalariform) such as are
found in the 'Azilian' engravings and paintings of the caverns, and
undulating lines. These graphic combinations resemble certain syllabic and
alphabetic characters of the Ægean, Cypriote, Phœnician, and Greco-Latin
inscriptions. However curious these resemblances may be, they are not
sufficient to warrant any theory connecting the signs on the painted pebbles
of the Azilians with the alphabetic characters of the oldest known systems
of writing.(3) Piette attempted to explain some of the exceedingly crude

Page 581

designs on these pebbles as a system of notation, others as pictographs and
religious symbols, and some few as genuine alphabetical signs, and
suggested that the cavern of Mas d'Azil was an Upper Palæolithic school
where reading, reckoning, writing, and the symbols of the sun were learned
and taught. The very wide distribution of these symbolic pebbles and the
painting of similar designs on the walls of the caverns certainly prove that
they had some religious or economic significance, which may be revealed
by subsequent research.

Fig. 248. Azilian galets
coloriés, flat, painted
pebbles, from the type

Page 582

station of Mas d'Azil.
After Piette.

The Tardenoisian Type Station
Turning from the region of the Pyrenees in Azilian times, we observe the
region lying between the Seine and the Meuse in northern France as the
scene of a contemporary industry. At the station of Fère-en-Tardenois, in the
Department of the Aisne, is found an especially large number of the pygmy
flints;(4) these present various geometric forms, including the primitive
triangular, as well as the rhomboidal, trapezoidal, and semicircular;
together, they were designated by de Mortillet as Tardenoisian flints, and in
1896, in monographing this microlithic flint industry, he traced them
throughout France, Belgium, England, Portugal, Spain, Italy, Germany, and
Russia, also along the southern Mediterranean through Algiers, Tunis,
Egypt, and eastward into Syria and even India.
These geometric flints were at first attributed to a primitive invasion which
was supposed to have occurred at the beginning of Neolithic times; thus the
Tardenoisian industry was considered as contemporaneous with that of the
Campignian, which is early Neolithic. It was further observed that the
topographical location of the stations closely followed the borders of ocean
inlets, or of river courses, and when the food materials found in the hearths
were compared, it appeared that these flints were used principally by
fishermen or tribes subsisting upon fish. From an examination of the flints,
it would appear that a very large number of them were adapted for insertion
in small harpoons, or that those of grooved form might even have been used
as fish-hooks. Thus the picture was drawn of a population of fishermen. The
Tardenoisian, therefore, was for a long time regarded as contemporaneous
with the early Neolithic rather than with the close of Palæolithic times, but
as exploration proceeded it was found that neither the remains of domestic
animals nor any traces of pottery occur in any of these Tardenoisian
deposits, which consequently have nothing in common with the true
Neolithic culture.
The problem was finally solved in 1909, when the grotto of Valle near
Gibaja, Santander, in northern Spain, was discovered by Breuil and

Page 583

Obermaier.(5) Here was a classic Azilian deposit containing all the well-
known Azilian types of bone implements, such as fine harpoons, carvings in
deer horn, bone javelins, polishers of deer bone, flint flakes resembling
those of the late Magdalenian, also microlithic flints of typical geometric
Tardenoisian form. This discovery established the fact that the lower levels
of the Tardenoisian industry were not really to be distinguished from the
Azilian, for here beneath layers with painted pebbles and harpoons of
Azilian style were harpoons with single and double rows of barbs of
Magdalenian pattern, but cut in stag horn instead of reindeer horn.
The mammalian life in this true Azilian-Tardenoisian layer includes the
chamois, roe-deer, wild boar, and urus, or wild cattle. In a layer just below,
which represents the close of the Magdalenian industrial period, there are
found, although rarely, remains of the reindeer, an animal hitherto unknown
in this part of Spain, also the wild boar, the bison, the ibex, and the lynx.
After this discovery it could no longer be questioned that the Azilian and
Tardenoisian were contemporary.
As to the relation of these two industries, Breuil remarks(6) that the
prolongation of the Tardenoisian types of flints is observed in Italy and in
Belgium, but neither the term 'Tardenoisian' nor the term 'Azilian' is
sufficiently comprehensive to embrace the totality of these little industries,
which will finally be distinguished clearly from each other. Of the two the
Azilian represents the prolongation of an ancient period of industry, the
progress of which was apparently from south to north, as we can trace the
distribution of the characteristic flat harpoons of deer horn from the
Cantabrian Mountains and the Pyrenees, through southern and central
France, to Belgium, England, and the western coast of Scotland. The later
industrial phase, the Tardenoisian, with its geometric trapeziform flints,
originally appears along the southern Mediterranean in Tunis and to the
eastward in the Crimea, while in France it represents a final phase of the
Palæolithic, closely approaching the period of the earliest Neolithic or pre-
Campignian hearths common along the Danube and observed in the vicinity
of Liége. Thus the most comprehensive term by which to designate the
ensemble of these implements, in Europe at least, would be Azilian-
Tardenoisian.

Page 584

Larger Image

Fig. 249. Small geometric
flints characteristic of the
Tardenoisian industry.
After de Mortillet. 295 to
303, 321, 322, 326. From
various sites in northern
France. 311. Uchaux,
Vaucluse, France. 305,
315, 320. Valley of the
Meuse, Belgium. 312,
313. Cabeço da Arruda,
Portugal. 304, 314. Italy.
317, 318, 329. Tunis.

Page 585

325. Egypt. 306, 310,
324, 328. Kizil-Koba,
Crimea. 307 to 309, 316,
319, 323, 327. India. All
one-half actual size.

Environment and Mammalian Life
It appears that the chief geographic change during this period was a
subsidence of the northern coasts of Europe and an advance of the sea
causing the circulation of warm oceanic currents and a more humid climate
favorable to reforestation.
To the north, in Belgium, the tundra fauna lingered during the extension of
the early Tardenoisian industry, for here we still find remains of the
reindeer, the arctic fox, and the arctic hare mingled in the fire-hearths with
flints of Tardenoisian type. This, observes Obermaier, constitutes proof that
the Tardenoisian, with the Azilian, must be placed at the very close of
Postglacial time and with the final stage of Upper Palæolithic industry.
To the south, in the region of Dordogne and the Pyrenees, the tundra fauna
had entirely disappeared, as well as that of the steppes and of the alpine
heights; the prevailing animal in the forests is the royal stag, adapted to
forests of temperate type and associated with the Eurasiatic forest and
meadow fauna which now dominated western Europe.
The only survivor of the great African-Asiatic fauna is the lion, which
appears in the late Palæolithic stations in the region of the Pyrenees; the
arctic wolverene also gives the fauna a Postglacial aspect, for, like the lion,
it is never found in central or western Europe after the close of Upper
Palæolithic times. Other enemies of the herbivorous fauna were the wolf
and the brown bear.
Besides the red deer, or stag, the forests at this time were filled with roe-
deer. To the south in the Pyrenees the moose still survived, and to the north
there were still found herds of reindeer which survived in central Europe as
late as the twelfth century. Wild boars were numerous, and in the streams
were found the beaver and the otter. In the forest borders and in the

Page 586

meadows hares and rabbits were abundant. Through the forests and
meadows of southern France and along the borders of the Danube ranged
the wild cattle (Bos primigenius). It would appear from our limited
knowledge of the life of Azilian-Tardenoisian times that bison were found
chiefly in the northern parts of Europe. There is little direct evidence in
regard to the wild horse, the remains of which do not occur in the hearths of
Azilian times.
Our knowledge of the life of the Spanish peninsula at a period closely
succeeding this is indirectly derived from the animal frescos in certain
caverns of northern Spain, which were formerly attributed to the Upper
Palæolithic but are now referred rather to the early Neolithic. Here are
found representations of the ibex, the stag, the fallow deer, the wild cattle,
and also of the wild horses. This would indicate that wild horses were still
roaming all over western Europe at the close of Upper Palæolithic times.
The presence of the moose in late Palæolithic times at Alpera, on the high
plateaus of Spain, has been determined; this animal has also been found in
the Pyrenees during the Azilian stage.(7)
The great contrast between the mammalian life of Magdalenian and that of
Azilian-Tardenoisian times is witnessed in the stations along the upper
Danube, as described by Koken.(8) In Höhlefels, Schmiechenfels, and
Propstfels, associated with implements of the late Magdalenian industry, are
found ten types of animals belonging to the forests and four characteristic
of the forests and meadows, or fourteen species altogether. With these are
mingled two alpine forms, the ibex and the alpine shrew; also two types of
mammals belonging to the steppes, and no less than six mammals and birds
from the tundras, namely, the reindeer, the arctic fox, the ermine, the arctic
hare, the banded lemming, and the arctic ptarmigan.
In wide contrast to this assemblage of late Magdalenian life on the upper
Danube, there appear in Azilian times along the shores of the middle
Danube in the stations of Ofnet and of Istein the following characteristic
forest forms: Sus scrofa ferus (wild boar), Cervus elaphus (stag), Capreolus
capreolus (roe-deer), Bos (?) primigenius (urus), Lepus (rabbit or hare),
Ursus arctos (brown bear), Felis leo (lion), Gulo luscus (common
wolverene), Lynchus lynx (lynx), Vulpes (fox), Mustela martes (marten),
Castor fiber (European beaver), Mus (field-mouse), Turdus (thrush). It thus

Page 587

appears that the alpine, the steppe, and the tundra faunæ had entirely
disappeared from this region.

Origin and Distrubution of the Azilian-Tardenoisian Industry
This industry represents the last stage of the Old Stone Age. The decline in
the art of fashioning flints, begun in Magdalenian times, appears to continue
in the Azilian-Tardenoisian. As to the tiny symmetrical flints which are
characteristic of this period, among the microliths of almost all the late
Magdalenian stations pre-Tardenoisian forms are found which may be
regarded as prototypes of the geometric Tardenoisian flints;(9) this
represents a new fashion established in flint-making under influences
coming from the south.
There was also a natural or local Azilian evolution from the Magdalenian
types and technique. In general the flint implements which had so long
prevailed in western Europe become smaller in diameter and more
carelessly retouched, showing marked deterioration even from the late
Magdalenian stages. For the preparation of hides and the fashioning of bone
we discover unsymmetrical planing tools (grattoirs), also small, well-
formed oval scrapers (racloirs), and microlithic scrapers. Borers (perçoirs)
with oblique ends and gravers (burins) made of small flakes are the types of
implements which most frequently occur, but the great variety of borers, so
characteristic of the Aurignacian and the Magdalenian industries, had
entirely disappeared in Azilian times.
The marks of industrial degeneration are also conspicuous in the bone
implements, which show a very great deterioration in number and quality as
compared with the Magdalenian, and which are principally confined to
three types—the harpoons, the awls (poinçons), and the smoothers
(lissoirs), together with very small bone borers (perçoirs). The distinctive
feature of the Azilian bone industry is the flat harpoon of stag horn; it is
known that the use of stags' antlers for fashioning harpoons began in the
late Magdalenian, when most of them were still being fashioned from
reindeer horn. These flat Azilian harpoons succeed the type of the double-
rowed, cylindrical harpoons of the late Magdalenian, and are found mainly
where the rivers, lakes, or pools offered favorable conditions for fishing.

Page 588

Thus the Azilian bone-harpoon industry, like the Tardenoisian microlithic
flint industry, was largely pursued by fisherfolk.

Larger Image

Fig. 250. Geographic
distribution of the
principal Azilian and
Tardenoisian industrial
stations in western
Europe, also Campigny
and Robenhausen.

We may imagine that the gradual disappearance of the reindeer, an animal
much more easily pursued and killed than the stag, was one of the causes of
the substitution of the various arts of fishing for those of hunting.

Page 589

It is to the excessively small or microlithic flints that the name Tardenoisian
especially applies, and it is the vast multiplication of these microliths and
their wide distribution over the whole area of the Mediterranean and of
western Europe which constitutes the most distinctive feature of this
industrial stage.(10) The triangular flint (Fig. 249) is certainly the most
ancient Tardenoisian type. It occurs in the Azilian stations of the Cantabrian
Mountains and of the Pyrenees, accompanied by the painted pebbles and
with other flints of Azilian type, but without the graving-tools; to the east it
is found in the stations of Savoy; and along the Danube it occurs at Ofnet,
associated with remains of the lion and the moose, also with ornamental
necklaces composed of the perforated teeth of the deer, identical with those
found in the type station of Mas d'Azil in the Pyrenees. To the north this
typical early Azilian culture extends to Istein, in Baden, where it includes
the microlithic flint flakes, the gravers, and the little round scrapers
associated here also with the stag and the prehistoric forest and meadow
fauna of western Europe. Exactly the same stage of industrial development
occurs in the grotto of Höhlefels, near Nuremberg, and in the shelter station
of Sous Sac, Ain. We invariably find proofs of the variety of these pygmy
flints as well as of their continuity from one station to another. All these
facts compel us to assign a very long period of time to the spread of these
industrial types.
The question which arises as to the sources of this special Tardenoisian
industry again finds archæologists divided. Schmidt inclines to the
autochthonous theory and regards the microlithic flint industry as an
outgrowth of tendencies already well developed in the Magdalenian. Breuil,
on the other hand,(11) dwells strongly on the evidence for circum-
Mediterranean sources. In putting the questions, Who were the Azilians?
Whence did they come? What were their ancestors? he is disposed to give
the answer already quoted, that, whichever industry is examined, we are
always obliged to look toward the south, toward some point along the
Mediterranean, for the origin of these microlithic flints. In Italy, which he
believes to have remained in an Aurignacian industrial stage throughout all
the long period of Magdalenian time, he finds at Mentone a layer overlying
the Aurignacian and containing small flints recalling the geometric forms of
the Azilian, as well as a multitude of the small round scrapers (racloirs)
characteristic of Azilian times. The upper layers at Mentone on the Riviera

Page 590

are paralleled by those observed near Otranto, in Sicily. It is certain, he
continues, that all around the Mediterranean there was a number of distinct
centres where microlithic implements of geometric form appeared, and
where the accompanying industries, in different stages of development,
were related to an Upper Palæolithic culture consisting of a continuous
Aurignacian type.

Larger Image

Fig. 251. Azilian stone
implements of types
surviving from the
Magdalenian and earlier
Palæolithic times. After

Page 591

R. R. Schmidt. 1. Finely
flaked point from the
large cave of Ofnet. 2, 3.
Small Azilian grattoirs,
or planing tools, from
Istein, on the upper
Danube. 4. Slender blade
from Kleinkems. 5.
Borer from Wüste
Scheuer. 6. Polyhedral
borer from Wüste
Scheuer. 7. Incurved
scraper from Istein. 8, 9,
10. Gravers or borers
from Istein. 11. Double
graver or borer with
points at the right and
left of the upper end. 1 to
4, actual size; 5 to 11,
one-half actual size.

Page 592

Fig. 252. Azilian double-
rowed harpoons of stag
horn, from Oban, on the
west coast of Scotland.
After Boule.

The labors of de Morgan, Capitan, and others have thrown great light on the
Palæolithic of Tunis, where a flint culture was developed only slightly
different from that of the Azilian of Valle, Santander, of the Mas d'Azil,
Ariège, and of Bobache, Drôme. A resemblance is also found in Portugal;
and southern Spain, despite its poverty of typical implements, shows a
similar evolution. Near Salamanca, northwest of Madrid, Spain, the grottos
contain schematic figures and colored pebbles resembling the Azilian. In

Page 593

Portugal the hearths of Mugem and Cabeço da Arruda are distinguished by
their triangular microliths and are undoubtedly Pre-Neolithic, because there
is neither pottery nor any trace of domesticated animals, excepting,
possibly, the dog.
To the north of Europe the discoveries in Belgium have especial
importance, for typical Azilian implements, including small round scrapers,
lateral gravers, elongated triangular microliths, and knife flakes are found
associated with the remains of the reindeer in the grotto of Remouchamp
and at Zonhoven. It appears in Belgium, as in Italy, that the use of the
Tardenoisian microlithic flint types is prolonged into a later time than that
of the typical Azilian flint implements—the scrapers, gravers, borers, and
knife flakes—which, as we have seen, appear at the end of the true
Magdalenian.
On the other side of the English Channel we again find these flints always
unmingled with pottery and usually distributed along the sea or river shores.
The best-known stations are those of Hastings, directly across the Channel
opposite Boulogne, and of Seven Oaks, near London; in Settle, Yorkshire, is
the Victoria Cave station. To the north, in Scotland, four Azilian stations
have been discovered around Oban, on the western coast near the head of
the Firth of Lorne, while Azilian harpoons have also been found on the Isle
of Oronsay, at its entrance.
Thus the spread of the very small Tardenoisian flint implements in the final
stages of the Palæolithic precedes the southern advent of the Neolithic.
In Germany only six Azilian-Tardenoisian stations have thus far been
discovered: two to the east of Düsseldorf, one in the neighborhood of
Weimar, two on the headwaters of the Rhine, near Basle, and, by far the
most important, the large and small grottos of Ofnet, on a small tributary of
the Danube northwest of Munich. This last is exceptionally important
because it is the only station where skeletons have been found buried with
Azilian-Tardenoisian flints, thereby enabling us positively to determine the
contemporary human races.

Burials in Azilian-Tardenoisian Times

Page 594

The strange interment which gives Ofnet its distinction belongs to the
period of Azilian-Tardenoisian industry.(12) This conclusion is not weakened
by the absence of Azilian harpoons or painted pebbles, because at this time
the cave of Ofnet served its frequenters only as a place of burial; there are
no hearths or flint workshops to indicate continued residence, as during
earlier Upper Palæolithic times.
This great ceremonial burial seems to afford the only positive evidence to
be found in all western Europe of the kind of people who were pursuing the
Azilian industry. The larger Ofnet grotto opens toward the southwest and
has a length of 39 feet and a width of 36 feet. It was first entered in early
Aurignacian times and shows successive layers of Aurignacian, early
Solutrean, and late Magdalenian cultures, above which lies a thick deposit
of the Azilian-Tardenoisian, in which is found the most remarkable
interment of all Palæolithic times.

Larger Image

Fig. 253. Section across the
entrance of the great
grotto of Ofnet near the

Page 595

Danube, occupied at
various times from the
beginning of the Upper
Palæolithic to the close
of the Bronze Age. After
R. R. Schmidt. IX.
Deposits of the Middle
Ages and of the La Tène
and Hallstatt cultures.
VIII. Deposits of the
Upper Neolithic. VII.
Azilian layer containing
the great burial of 33
skulls. VI. Late
Magdalenian layer
containing the banded
lemmings of the tundras.
V. Late Solutrean layer
with typical laurel-leaf
spear points. IV., III.
Deposits of late and
early Aurignacian age,
III. containing arctic
rodents. II. Dolomite
sand with a few teeth of
the mammoth and bones
of the woolly rhinoceros
marked by the teeth of
hyænas.

This is a ceremonial burial of thirty-three skulls of people belonging to two
distinct races: respectively, brachycephalic and dolichocephalic, and
certainly not related in any way to the Crô-Magnon race. In one group
twenty-seven skulls were found embedded in ochre and arranged in a sort
of nest, with the faces all looking westward. As the skulls in the centre were
more closely pressed together and crushed than those on the outside, it

Page 596

seems probable that these skulls were added one by one from time to time,
those on the outside being the most recent additions. About a yard distant a
similar nest was found, containing six more skulls embedded and arranged
in exactly the same manner. The interment probably took place shortly after
death and certainly before the separate bones had been disintegrated by
decomposition, for not only the lower jaw but a number of the neck
vertebra were found with each skull. The heads had been severed from the
necks by a sharp flint, the marks of which are plainly visible on some of the
vertebræ.

Fig. 254. Burial nest of six
skulls, all facing
westward, from the large
grotto of Ofnet. After R.
R. Schmidt.

Page 597

It is noteworthy that most of these skulls are those of women and young
children, there being only four adult male skulls. On this account some
advance the theory of cannibalism; others that, being taken captive by a
tribe of enemies, these unfortunate people were offered in sacrifice, in
which case decapitation was the means of death. But, then, how explain the
abundant ornaments of stag teeth and snail shells (Helix nemoralis) with
which the skulls of the women and little children were decorated, and the
treasured implements of flint with which all save one of the men and a few
of the women and children were provided?
There are precedents for all these singular features of the Ofnet interment in
other Upper Palæolithic burials, namely, the embedding in ochre, the
offerings of ornaments of teeth and of shells, the separate interment of the
skull—all these were customs more or less characteristic of the Upper
Palæolithic, but never observed in Neolithic times.

Page 598

Fig. 255. Skulls of the two
races of Ofnet. Three
views of a broad-headed
or brachycephalic skull
(above) from the great
burial at Ofnet. Three
views of a narrow-
headed or
dolichocephalic skull
(below) from the same
grotto. After R. R.
Schmidt. One-quarter
life size.

Page 599

It will be recalled that the custom of burying the entire body, as well as that
of embedding the body in ochre, is first observed among the late
Neanderthals and obtained throughout the entire Upper Palæolithic from the
Aurignacian burials of Grimaldi to the Azilian, of Mas d'Azil. No other
case, however, is known of the westward turning of the face: in most of the
Upper Palæolithic burials the face of the departed looks toward the opening
of the grotto; but, although the grotto of Ofnet opens toward the southwest,
the skulls, without exception, were facing exactly to the west and looking
toward the wall rather than toward the entrance of the cavern.

The New Broad-Headed and Narrow-Headed Races of Ofnet
The burials at Ofnet are the first observed in western Europe which present
a mingling of races. This in itself is a fact of great interest; it is a prelude to
what characterizes all the populations of western Europe at the present time,
namely, the presence of races widely separated in origin and in anatomical
structure, but closely united by similar customs, industries, and beliefs.
A second fact of even greater importance is the proof of the arrival in
western Europe toward the close of Palæolithic times of two entirely new
human stocks; one broad-headed, resembling the modern Alpine or Celtic
type; the other narrow-headed, resembling the modern 'Mediterranean' type
of Sergi. Beside these pure types there are several blended forms which are
intermediate or mesaticephalic.
Of the eight brachycephalic heads, six are those of children; the two adult
brachycephalic crania belong to young women and are, therefore, not quite
so characteristic as male skulls would be, for in general racial type is more
strongly marked in men than in women; the remaining skulls are either of a
blended form or purely dolichocephalic.
The relationship of the broad-headed race to other prehistoric and existing
broad-headed races of western Europe is also a matter of very great interest.
The Ofnet brachycephals are regarded by Schliz(13) as closely similar to the
type skull of the so-called Grenelle race, which, in turn, is closely similar to
the Furfooz type. Thus the cephalic index of one (Fig. 255) of these broad,
flattened skulls of Ofnet is 83.33 per cent; the face is relatively narrow, the

Page 600

zygomatic index being low—76.34 per cent; the brain capacity of the
female skulls does not exceed 1,320 c.cm. The skull is further described as
small, smooth, and delicately modelled, with a correspondingly feeble
dentition, the teeth being small; the processes of muscular attachment are
slightly developed, all of which characters indicate that the skull belonged
to a woman about twenty-five years of age. The forehead is low, broad, and
prominent. It is altogether typically parallel to the 'skull of Grenelle,' as well
as to the female 'skull of Auvernier' described by Kollmann. The peculiarity
of this broad-headed race, like that of Grenelle and of Furfooz, is that, while
the forehead is of only moderate breadth, the posterior part of the skull is
extremely broad. The broad-headed people of Ofnet are thus definitely
considered by Schliz(14) as members of the Furfooz-Grenelle race.
The narrow-headed race of the Ofnet burials is distinct in every respect and
presents resemblances to the branch of the 'Mediterranean' race found in the
foreground of the Alpine regions to-day, in which the head is of a pear-
shaped type. The best preserved of these dolichocephalic skulls (Fig. 255)
presents an index of 70.50 per cent, with a brain capacity in the male of
1,500 c.cm., while the smallest brain capacity is that found in one of the
female skulls with 1,100 c.cm. Among the five adult purely dolichocephalic
skulls the face is not in the least of the broad or disharmonic Crô-Magnon
type, but is in proportion with the cranium, and is thus truly harmonic. The
resemblance of this narrow-headed Ofnet skull to that of the Brünn race,
which we have described as occurring in Moravia in Solutrean times, is
only partial, and Schliz concludes that among the narrow-headed people of
Ofnet we have a form of dolichocephaly which is not identical with any of
the known early dolichocephalic forms of western Europe, but which
pursues an independent line of development similar to the narrow-headed
races in the borders of the Alpine region of the present day. Thus this head
type, of a uniform elliptic contour, seems to have become a stable racial
element of the Alpine population, since we meet it again in later prehistoric
times in the region of the southern and western foreground of the Alps.
Among the children's skulls, two are of the narrow-headed, pear-shaped
type similar to the Alpine dolichocephals of to-day, that is, with a narrow
forehead and very broad posterior portions of the skull.

Page 601

Central Origin of the Broad-Headed (Alpine?) Races
The affinity of the broad-headed Azilian-Tardenoisian tribes of the Danube
to those found in the Upper Palæolithic of northwestern Europe seems to be
clearly established. The latter are sometimes known as the Grenelle race
and sometimes as the Furfooz race. Boule(15) observes in regard to the
skeletal remains of Grenelle which were found in the alluvium near Paris, in
1870, that it is quite impossible now, forty years after their discovery, to
demonstrate their geologic antiquity. This is not the case with the Furfooz
broad-heads, the age of which we regard as well established, but since the
head type appears to be the same in both cases, we may speak of this race as
the Furfooz-Grenelle.
In a cave near Furfooz, in the valley of the Lesse, Belgium, sixteen
skeletons were discovered by Dupont in 1867. With the bones were found
implements of reindeer horn and remains of the late Pleistocene fauna of
northern Europe.(16) The reindeer and the tundra fauna of Belgium were
contemporaneous with the early Tardenoisian culture and with the stag and
forest fauna of southern France, so that the skeletons of Furfooz may safely
be referred to Azilian-Tardenoisian times.

Page 602

Fig. 256. Broad-headed skull of
uncertain archæologic age, either
Palæolithic or Neolithic,
discovered at Grenelle, near Paris,
in 1870. After de Quatrefages and
Hamy. One-quarter life size.

Fig. 257. Opening of the grotto of
Furfooz on the Lesse, a tributary of
the Meuse, near Namur, Belgium,
where the skeletal remains of 16
individuals and the type skulls of
the broad-headed Furfooz race
were discovered in 1867. After
Dupont.

Only two of the Furfooz skulls were preserved in good shape; they are of brachycephalic or sub-
brachycephalic form, and, following the suggestion of de Quatrefages and Hamy, these skulls have
been spoken of as belonging to the 'brachycephalic Furfooz race.' The men of this race may certainly
be regarded as belonging to Upper Palæolithic times, whereas the brachycephalic race found at
Grenelle, near Paris, is probably Neolithic. This by no means prevents the Furfooz and the Grenelle
types belonging to the same general brachycephalic race; it is altogether probable that they do, and
that with them may be included the Ofnet broad-heads.

Page 603

Fig. 258. Section of the grotto of
Furfooz, showing the burial of 16
skeletons of the Furfooz race and
the entrance of the grotto blocked
by a mass of stone. After Dupont.

Fig. 259. One of the type skulls of the
broad-headed Furfooz race, from
the burial grotto of Furfooz,
Belgium. After de Quatrefages and
Hamy. One-quarter life size.

Page 604

Fig. 260. Restoration of the broad-
headed man of Grenelle, modelled
by Mascré, under the direction of
A. Rutot. This type of head is
similar to that of Ofnet.

There are several opinions regarding the geographic centres from which these broad-heads entered
Europe; it is generally believed that they came from the high plateaus of central Asia. By Giuffrida-
Ruggeri the Furfooz race is identified with the existing broad-headed Alpine race (Homo sapiens
alpinus), and is mistakenly adduced as proof that the Alpine race originated in Europe and is not in
any way related to the Mongolian races of central Asia. A more conservative view(17) is that the
recent European broad-headed types commonly included under the Alpine race cannot yet be traced
back to the Furfooz-Grenelle ancestors, because their connection is too problematical. Schliz, on the
other hand, considers that the Furfooz-Grenelle race survived in northwestern Europe and
corresponds with that which became the builders of the megalithic dolmens of Neolithic times, the
latter being but slightly modified descendants of the original Furfooz race; he believes, moreover,
that these broad-headed peoples first occupied central Europe and then extended to western Europe,
where they correspond to the Alpine race, at least in part; that they also migrated to the north and
were the basis of the broad-headed races now found in Holland and Denmark.

Southern Origin of the Narrow-Headed (Mediterranean?) Races
While it seems probable that the broad-heads represent a central migration from Eurasia, evidence of
an industrial and cultural character indicates that the narrow-heads came from the south; this is seen

Page 605

both in the south Mediterranean origin of the Tardenoisian flint industry and in the new schematic
influences on the decadent art of Upper Palæolithic times.
It seems, observes Breuil, as if the schematic influences in art during Upper Palæolithic times always
extend from the south toward the north; they predominate entirely in the painted rocks of Andalusia,
in the Pyrenees, and in Dordogne. In the grotto of Marsoulas, Haute-Garonne, the Azilian motifs are
clearly superposed upon the Magdalenian polychromes. This purely schematic phase, which abruptly
follows the figure art of middle Magdalenian times, first made itself felt in the late Magdalenian.
There was a sudden loss of realism which does not indicate affiliation but rather the infiltration of
strange elements from the south; the precursors of the destructive invasion of the Azilian-
Tardenoisian tribes who were driven from their Mediterranean homes by the westward advance of
the conquering Neolithic races. We imagine(18) that in southern Spain there dwelt in Upper
Palæolithic times a population differing from the Magdalenians of France and of the Cantabrian
Mountains in their lower artistic tastes. It would therefore appear that the schematic art had its home
toward the south of the peninsula of Spain about the time of the invasion of the Azilian culture in
France.

Northern Origin of the Baltic (Teutonic?) Races
For the first time the retreat of the Scandinavian ice-fields and the less severe climate permitted a
northern migration route along the shores of the Baltic. This is the first known migration of any
tribes along this route, which throughout all glacial times had been blocked by the vicinity of the
Scandinavian and Baltic ice-fields, but which was now opened by the approach of the more genial
climate which succeeded the long Postglacial Stage. Whether this Baltic invasion was the advance
wave of a northern long-headed Teutonic race is wholly a matter of conjecture.
"Other peoples," observes Breuil,(19) "known at present only from their industries, were advancing
toward the close of the Upper Palæolithic along the northern and southern shores of the Baltic and
persisted for an appreciable time before the arrival of the tribes introducing the early Neolithic
Campignian culture which accumulated in the kitchen-middens along the same shores. Like the
southern races of Azilian-Tardenoisian times, these northerly tribes were truly Pre-Neolithic,
ignorant both of agriculture and of pottery; they brought with them no domesticated animals
excepting the dog, which is known at Mugem, at Tourasse, and at Oban, in northwestern Scotland. In
the use of bone harpoons of elegant form and in the taste displayed in fine decorations engraved
upon bone, these tribes suggest the culture of the Magdalenians, but a close examination shows that
it could not have been derived from the Magdalenian type. The community of style with the painted
and engraved figures found in western Siberia and in the central Ural region and north of the Altai
Mountains denotes rather an Asiatic and Siberian origin.
"The decorative designs of these Baltic peoples were very different from those of the Crô-Magnons
in Magdalenian times, and are not schematic; the conception of the animal figures, although
naturalistic, is as crude as that of the early Aurignacian figures, and is far inferior to that of the
Magdalenian stage." "It is probable," continues Breuil, "that in these northerly regions the closing
cultures of the Upper Palæolithic developed along more or less parallel lines with those observed in
the south in giving rise to ethnographic elements which travelled along the littoral regions of the
northern seas."

Page 606

Larger Image

Fig. 261. Implements and decorations
showing the conventional and
crude animal designs of the art of
the Baltic, from Maglemose,
Denmark. After Reinecke and
Obermaier. The implements
include bone harpoons, fish-hooks,
horn chisels, awls, spear points,
and smoothers. About one-fifth
actual size.

This race and culture is described by Obermaier(20) as follows:
When primitive man took possession of Denmark the sea-coast was so remote that he could also
reach southern Scandinavia. The station of Maglemose in the 'Great Moor,' discovered and described
by F. L. Sarauw, of Copenhagen, in 1900, is near the harbor of Mullerup on the western coast of
Zealand and not far from the shore of an ancient freshwater lake formation. These people were lake-
dwellers, living perhaps on rafts but not on dwellings supported by piles. From these rafts it is
supposed the implements dropped into the lake. The 881 flint implements found here include
scrapers, borers, cleavers, and knives, as well as microlithic flints. They show no trace of the
Neolithic art of polishing, merely suggesting certain chipped styles observed in the
'kjöddenmöddings.' (See Figs. 263, 264, and 265.) The influence of the Palæolithic is much stronger,
especially in the case of the microlithic Tardenoisian types. In the industrial culture of Maglemose,
however, far more important than stone are implements of horn and bone. These the Maglemose folk
obtained from the wild ox, moose, stag, and roe-deer, fashioning them into tools of various types,

Page 607

some of which are shown in Fig. 261. Many of these tools are ornamented with conventional designs
or very crude animal outlines on one or both surfaces.
The forests of this time consisted of the characteristic northern flora including numerous evergreens,
the birch, aspen, hazel, and elm, but without any trace of the oak. There is absolutely no trace of
pottery in the Maglemose deposits. Of great interest is the fact that skeletal remains of the domestic
dog are found here.
The Maglemose culture of the Baltic region is regarded as contemporary with the Azilian and
Tardenoisian in the south. It contains types, not of flint but of bone, which are prophetic of the
Neolithic. Traces of this culture have been found throughout northern Germany, in Denmark, and in
southern Sweden, as well as to the east and in the Baltic provinces. Although no human remains
have as yet been discovered, it is highly probable that these people belonged to the northern Teutonic
races.

Conclusion as to the Relationships of the Palæolithic Races
Thus in southern, central, and northern Europe the close of Upper Palæolithic times is marked by the
invasion of new Eurasiatic races, all in a Pre-Neolithic stage of industry and art. It is not improbable
that these races were advance waves from the same geographic regions as the Neolithic tribes which
followed them.
From the earliest Palæolithic to Neolithic times it does not appear that western Europe was ever a
centre of human evolution in the sense that it gave rise to a single new species of man. The main
racial evolution and the earlier and later branches of the human family were established in the east
and successively found their way westward; nor is there at present any ground for believing that any
very prolonged evolution or transformation of human types occurred in western Europe.
We should regard as wholly unproved the notion that either of these Palæolithic races of western
Europe gave rise to others which succeeded them in geologic time; the only sequence of this sort to
which some degree of probability may be attached is that the Heidelberg race was ancestral to the
Neanderthal race.
In most instances, such races as the Piltdown, the Crô-Magnon, the Brünn, the Furfooz-Grenelle, and
the Mediterranean arrived fully formed, with all their mental and physical attributes and tendencies
very distinctly developed. There is some evidence, but not of a very conclusive kind, that the
modification of certain of these races in western Europe was partly in the nature of a decline; this
was apparently the case both with the Neanderthals and with the Crô-Magnons.
We may therefore imagine that the family tree or lines of descent of the races of the Old Stone Age
consisted of a number of entirely separate branches, which had been completely formed in the great
Eurasiatic continent, a land mass infinitely larger and more capable of producing a variety of races
than the diminutive peninsular area of western Europe.
A review of these races in descending order, in respect to stature, the cephalic index, and brain
capacity, is presented in the following table:

Comparative
Height
Frontal Cephalic Brain Length of
of Height
Angle Index Capacity Arm and
Skull
Leg

Page 608

c.cm. ft. in.
Recent.
(H. sapiens).
90 59 ... 1400- 5 7 69.73%
European (average).
1500

Upper Palæolithic.
Ofnet Race
(brachycephalic) ... ... 86.21 1400 ... ...
Ofnet Race
(dolichocephalic) ... ... 70.50 1500 ... ...
Crô-Magnon Race
(old man of Crô- ... ... 73.76 1590 6 ...
Magnon type)
... ... ? 63- 1775- 5 10½- 66.05%
Grimaldi
1880
(Crô-Magnons) ? 76.27 ... 6 4½ -69%
Chancelade ... ... 72.02 1700 4 11 ...
Aurignac ... ... 65.7 ... 5 3 ...
Grimaldi Race.
Grimaldi type ... ... 69.27 1580 5 1 63.12%
(negroid)
Brünn Race.
75 51.22 65.7 or 1350 ... ...
Brünn I
68.2

Lower Palæolithic.
Neanderthal Race
(H.
Neanderthalensis).
La Chapelle 65 40.5 75 1626 5 3 ...
Spy II 67 44.3 75.7 ? 1723 5 3 ...
Spy I 57.5 40.9 70 ? 1562 5 4 ...
La Ferrassie I ... ... ... ... 5 5 68%
La Ferrassie II ... ... ... ... 4 10½ 68%
... ... ... 1367 ... ...
La Quina
(approx.)
Krapina D 66 42.2 ? 83.7 ... ... ...
Neanderthal 62 40.4 73.9 1408 5 4 ...
66 or 40 77.9 1250 or ... ...
Gibraltar
73-74 1296
Pre-Neanderthaloids
Piltdown Race.
... ... ? 78 or ? 1300 ... ...
Piltdown
? 79 ? 1500
Trinil Race

Page 609

52.5 34.2 73.4 or 850-1000 5 7 ...
(Pithecanthropus)
70 900

Anthropoid Apes.
56 37.7 ... 600 ... 104%
Apes (maximum) (chimpanzee
minimum.)
The chief authorities for these measurements are Schwalbe, Dubois, Keith, Smith, Woodward,
Boule, Sollas, Sera, Klaatsch, Fraipont, Makowsky, Verneau, Testut, and Broca.

Larger Image

Fig. 262. Tree showing the main
theoretic lines of descent of the
chief Pre-Neolithic races
discovered in western Europe.
(The Grimaldi race is omitted on
account of its aberrant character.
The northern Teutonic long-heads
are also omitted.) The Trinil,
Heidelberg, and Neanderthal races
are represented as offshoots of one
great branch. The Piltdown race is
represented as an independent
branch of quite unknown relations

Page 610

to the other races. It is probable
that the five or six branches of
Homo sapiens discovered in the
Upper Palæolithic separated from
each other in Lower Palæolithic
times in Asia. Of these the Brünn
race is by far the most primitive.
The migration routes of invasion of the successive Lower Palæolithic races—the Piltdown, the
Heidelberg, and the Neanderthal—are entirely unknown; we can only infer from the wide
distribution of the Chellean and Acheulean cultures to the south, along the northern African coast, as
well as to the east, that these races may have had a southerly or circum-Mediterranean origin. This
does not mean that either of these Lower Palæolithic races were of negroid or Ethiopian affinity,
because the Neanderthals show absolutely no negroid characters. In fact, throughout all Palæolithic
time the solitary instance of the two Grimaldi skeletons furnishes the sole anatomical evidence we
possess of the entrance of a negroid people into Europe, which contrasts widely with the
overwhelming evidence of the dominance in western Europe first of the non-negroid Neanderthals,
and then of the Crô-Magnons who probably belonged to the Caucasian stock.
The evidence as to the sources and migrations of the Upper Palæolithic races is also indirect. The
theory of the Crô-Magnons entering Europe by the southerly or Mediterranean route we have seen to
rest upon purely cultural or industrial grounds, namely, the spread of the Aurignacian industry
around the Mediterranean shores. On the other hand, the succeeding culture, the Solutrean, and the
succeeding race to enter Europe, the Brünn, both appear to be of central or of direct easterly origin.
It is only toward the close of the Upper Palæolithic that another southerly or Mediterranean invasion
occurs, bringing in the microlithic Tardenoisian culture, which, although anatomical evidence is
wanting, would appear to be an advance wave of the great invasion of the true 'Mediterranean' race.
During the Upper Palæolithic Epoch another invasion apparently occurs from the east along the
central migration route, namely, that of the broad-headed Furfooz-Grenelle races.
Thus in surveying the whole period of the Old Stone Age we find that there is some evidence for the
theory of an alternation of southerly, of easterly, and finally of northeasterly invasions of races
bringing in new industries and ideas.

Transition to the Neolithic. The Campignian. The Robenhausian
Apart from the special and somewhat debated question of the place of the Campignian culture in the
prehistory of Europe we may close our survey of the Upper Palæolithic by pointing out some of its
contrasts with the Neolithic.

Page 611

Fig. 263. Stages in the manufacture of
the Neolithic stone ax, or hache.
After de Mortillet. 534. Hache of
flint, roughly flaked into shape,
from Olendon, Calvados. 535.
Hache of flint from Oise, ready for
polishing. It has been finely
chipped to a shape of perfect
symmetry, with especial care to
smooth out and reduce the large
facets made by the preliminary
flaking. 536. Hache of flint after
the first polishing, from Abbeville,
on the Somme. The cutting edge
has been completely polished, but
along the sides the facets made by
flaking are plainly visible. 537.
Hache of flint completely polished,
from Le Vesinet, Seine-et-Oise. In
this last stage one scarcely notices
the faint traces of facets which
show that this hache has passed
through all the preceding stages.
Two-ninths actual size.

The arrival of the Neolithic cultures and industries in western Europe marks one of the most
profound changes in all prehistory and introduces us to a new period which must be treated in an
entirely different historic spirit. This new era began between 7,000 to 10,000 years ago, or with the
close of the Daun stage, the last geologic feature of Postglacial times.
There are two theories regarding the close of Upper Palæolithic and the beginning of Neolithic
times. The older theory, which still has some adherents, is that the Upper Palæolithic races and
industries suddenly gave way before the arrival of new and superior races bringing in the Neolithic

Page 612

culture. The newer theory is that there are evidences of gradual transfusions from the Upper
Palæolithic into the Neolithic cultures and that these are found in some of the oldest Neolithic sites.

Fig. 264. Stone hatchet, or tranchet,
from the type station of Campigny,
after Salmon, d'Ault du Mesnil,
and Capitan. One-half actual size.

Fig. 265. Stone pick, or pic, from the
type station of Campigny, after

Page 613

Salmon, d'Ault du Mesnil, and
Capitan. About one-half actual
size.

In 1898 there appeared an article(21) by Philippe Salmon, d'Ault du Mesnil, and Capitan, entitled,
"Le Campignien," defending the theory of an early and transitional Neolithic stage, the Campignian.
(22) The type station of this early culture was pointed out by Salmon in 1886; it lies a little more than
a mile northwest of the village of Blangy, on the River Bresle, on a site well placed for natural
defense. The remains of the hut-dwellings of this camp and of various industrial objects appear to
indicate that this station belongs to the earliest phase of the Neolithic Period. These Campignians
owe little to the culture or industry of the races which previously occupied this region of western
Europe; they are entire strangers, purely Neolithic in type.
While this is the age of polished, as distinguished from chipped, stone, the axe (hache) of polished
stone is still very rare in the Campignian. There prevail flaked flint types common to all the previous
stages of the Stone Age, such as the knives (couteaux), planers (grattoirs), and spear or dart heads
(pointes de sagaie), but we notice the appearance of two entirely new flint implements: first, the
triangular knife or stone hatchet (tranchet), of the type (Fig. 264) common in the Danish kitchen-
middens; this knife has a broad, sharp cutting edge flaked on one side; second (Fig. 265), there is a
sort of elongated axe or pick (pic) with chipped sides and an end more or less conical in shape.(23)
These people also made use of large flakes of flint. If we regard the Campignian as a prolonged
industrial stage in northern Europe, it certainly precedes the appearance of abundant axe heads of
polished flint. In France it seems to appear occasionally as a local phase of the Neolithic.

Page 614

Fig. 266. Restoration of the Neolithic
man of Spiennes, Belgium,
modelled by Mascré under the
direction of A. Rutot.

The prevailing opinion at present is that the Campignian distinctly precedes the typical Neolithic of
the Swiss lake-dwellings, a stage known as the Robenhausian. Thus the Neolithic culture becomes
fully established in the period of the Swiss Lake Dwellings, remains of which are found at
Moosseedorf, Wauwyl, Concise on Lake Neufchâtel, and Robenhausen on Lake Pfaeffikon. The
latter is the Robenhausian type station.

Distinctive Features of the Neolithic Epoch
The first of these is the presence of implements of polished stone which find their way gradually into
western Europe. The neoliths at first are greatly outnumbered by chipped and flaked implements,
and some of the latter show a survival of the familiar types of the Old Stone Age, while others
belong to entirely distinct types which had an independent development in the far East.
The chief economic change is seen in the rudimentary knowledge of agriculture and in the use of a
variety of plants and seeds, accompanied by the gradual appearance of implements for the
preparation of the soil and for harvesting the crops. This new source of food supply leads to the
establishment of permanent stations and camps and more or less to the abandonment of nomadic
modes of life. Near the ancient camp sites and villages, therefore, are found implements for the
preparation of skins and hides, because the chase was still maintained for purposes of clothing as
well as for food.
Still more distinctive of the Neolithic is the introduction of pottery, which is at first used in the
preparation of food. In the hearths or kitchen-middens and in the refuse heaps of the camps we no
longer find evidence of the splitting of the jaws of mammals and of the long and short bones of the
limbs, or even of the larger foot bones, in search of marrow, which is such a universal feature of the
Upper Palæolithic deposits.
The artistic impulse of the north is very crude and naturalistic. In the Spanish peninsula,
accompanying and following the schematic period described in the early part of this chapter, there
was a long stage of development in which men were painting on rocks, mostly in the form of
silhouettes, naturalistic figures of animals and of people.(24)
The presence of the moose in these drawings concurs with that of the two bison represented in the
cavern of Cogul and would tend to indicate that these paintings belong to Upper Palæolithic times,
although it is now considered that they are of early Neolithic age. The character of these animal
designs is totally different from that of the Magdalenian period in the north and is analogous rather
to that of the Bushmen of South Africa. The authors of these frescos represent not only the ibex,
stag, and wild cattle but also the horse, moose, fallow deer, wolf, and occasionally the birds. There
are many features in this art which show its absolute independence of origin from that of the
Magdalenian of the north, among them the frequent presence of composition and the almost
invariable presence of human figures.

Page 615

Fig. 267. Fresco from the rock shelter of
Alpera, Albacete, Spain, painted in
dark red and representing a stag
hunt, the hunters being armed with
bows and arrows. Attributed to the
southern races arriving in Neolithic
times. After Breuil and Obermaier.

The frescos in the Spanish caverns of Alpera and of Cogul recall those of southern France but are
almost always grouped in series of the chase, of encampment, and perhaps of war. This frequency of
human figures, the representations of the bow and arrow, and the presence of a small animal which
may be recognized as the domesticated dog are indications of an entirely distinct race coming from
the south and bringing in a new spirit in art which has no relation whatever to that of the
Magdalenian.

Neolithic Mammalian Life
Even in the oldest Neolithic deposits no trace of the horse as an object of food appears. The
domestication of this animal was introduced from the east, and thus it ceased to be an object of the
chase. The newly arriving tribes were undoubtedly attracted by the abundance of horses, both of the
forest and Celtic types, which had survived from Upper Palæolithic times. A very distinctive feature
of the modern horses, however, should be mentioned, that is, the presence of a forelock covering the
face, no trace of which is indicated in any of the Upper Palæolithic carvings or engravings.

Page 616

The wild animal life of western Europe at this time is a direct survival of the great Eurasiatic forest
and meadow fauna which we have traced from the earliest Palæolithic times. It includes the bison,
the long-horned urus, the stag, the roe-deer, the moose, the wild boar, the forest horse, the Celtic
horse, the beaver, the hare, and the squirrel. The fallow deer (Cervus dama) also appears more
abundantly. Among the carnivora are the brown bear, the badger, the marten, the otter, the wolf, the
fox, the wildcat, and the wolverene. The lion has disappeared entirely from western Europe. The
reindeer survives only in the north.
As observed above, two of these wild animals were early chosen by the invaders for domestication,
namely, the plateau or Celtic horse and the forest horse. The former type is found in the Neolithic
deposits of Essex, England. The wild urus (Bos primigenius) was hunted but was not domesticated.
Two new varieties of domestic cattle appear, neither of which has been previously observed in
western Europe. The first of these is the 'Celtic shorthorn' (Bos longifrons), the probable ancestor of
the small breeds of British short-horned and hornless cattle. The second is the 'longhorn' (Bos
taurus), which shows some points of resemblance to the 'urus' (Bos primigenius) but is not directly
related to it. Direct wild ancestors of this latter animal are said to occur in the Pleistocene of Italy. A
new type of pig also appears, the so-called turf pig (Sus scrofa palustris).
The Neolithic invaders, or men of the New Stone Age, thus brought with them, or domesticated from
among the animals which they found in the forests of western Europe, a great variety of the same
types of animals as those domesticated to-day, namely, cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, horses, and dogs.

Larger Image

Fig. 268. Map showing the geographic
distribution of the three principal
cranial types of man inhabiting
western Europe at the present time.
Prepared after Ripley's maps in his

Page 617

Races of Europe. Also the
restricted area neighboring the
Vézère valley, where the supposed
descendants of the disharmonic
type of the Crô-Magnons are still
to be found. Other small Crô-
Magnon colonies are not
represented. The heavy-faced lines
show those districts where the race
indicated is most numerous and
found in the greatest perfection of
type.

The Prehistoric and Historic Races of Europe
Before the close of Neolithic times all the direct ancestors of the modern races of Europe had not
only established themselves, but had begun to separate into those larger and smaller colonies which
now mark out the great anthropological divisions of western Europe. It is therefore interesting to
glance at the cranial distinctions of the men who successively entered western Europe in Upper
Palæolithic and Neolithic times. The upper part of the table corresponds with that of Ripley.(25)
MODERN, NEOLITHIC, AND UPPER PALÆOLITHIC EUROPEAN RACES OF THE
EXISTING SPECIES OF MAN (HOMO SAPIENS)
Cephalic
Index
Type Head Face Hair Eyes Stature Nose
Average
per cent
VI. Teutonic (? Long, High, Very Blue. Tall. Narrow, 75
Baltic). narrow. narrow. light. aquiline.
V. Mediterranean Long, High, Dark Dark. Medium, Rather 75
(? Ofnet). narrow. narrow. brown slender. broad.
or
black.
IV. Alpine, Celtic Round. Broad. Light Hazel- Medium, Variable; 87
(? Ofnet). chestnut. gray. stocky. rather
broad;
heavy.
III. Furfooz- Broad. Medium. ? ? ? ? 79-85
Grenelle
(? Ofnet)
II. Brünn- Long. Low, ? ? ? ? 68.2
Předmost medium. or
(Moravia). 65.7
I. Crô-Magnon. Long. Low and ? ? Tall to Narrow, ? 63-
broad. medium. aquiline. ? 76.27

Page 618

It would appear that five out of these six great racial types had entered Europe before the close of
Upper Palæolithic times, namely, I to V in the above table.
How about the sixth type; the narrow-headed, light-haired people of the north, the modern Teutonic
type? This question cannot be answered at present. We have, however, high authority for the
invasion of a new northern race, which may have been of the Teutonic type, as occurring before the
close of Palæolithic times. These were the people described above, migrating along the shores of the
Baltic with a new northern Maglemose culture and crude naturalistic art.

Conclusions as to the Old Stone Age
The above outline of the beginnings of the Neolithic Age shows that the Palæolithic represents a
complete cycle of human development; we have traced its rise, its perfection, its decline. During this
dawning period of the long prehistory of Europe the dominant features are the very great antiquity of
the spirit of man and the fundamental similarity between the great steps of prehistory and of history.
The rise of the spirit of man through the Old Stone Age cannot be traced continuously in a single
race because the races were changing; as at the present time, one race replaced another, or two races
dwelt side by side. The sudden appearance in Europe at least 25,000 years ago of a human race with
a high order of brain power and ability was not a leap forward but the effect of a long process of
evolution elsewhere. When the prehistoric archæology of eastern Europe and of Asia has been
investigated we may obtain some light on this antecedent development.
During this age the rudiments of all the modern economic powers of man were developed: the
guidance of the hand by the mind, manifested in his creative industry; his inventive faculty; the
currency or spread of his inventions; the adaptation of means to ends in utensils, in weapons, and in
clothing. The same is true of the æsthetic powers, of close observation, of the sense of form, of
proportion, of symmetry, the appreciation of beauty of animal form and the beauty of line, color, and
form in modelling and sculpture. Finally, the schematic representation and notation of ideas so far as
we can perceive was alphabetic rather than pictographic. Of the musical sense we have at present no
evidence. The religious sense, the appreciation of some power or powers behind the great
phenomena of nature, is evidenced in the reverence for the dead, in burials apparently related to
notions of a future existence of the dead, and especially in the mysteries of the art of the caverns.
All these steps indicate the possession of certain generic faculties of mind similar to our own. That
this mind of the Upper Palæolithic races was of a kind capable of a high degree of education we
entertain no doubt whatever because of the very advanced order of brain which is developed in the
higher members of these ancient races; in fact, it may be fairly assumed from experiences in the
education of existing races of much lower brain capacity, such as the Eskimo or Fuegian. The
emergence of such a mind from the mode of life of the Old Stone Age is one of the greatest
mysteries of psychology and of history.
The rise and fall of cultures and of industries, which is at this very day the outstanding feature of the
history of western Europe, was fully typified in the very ancient contests with stone weapons which
were waged along the borders of the Somme, the Marne, the Seine, and the Danube. No doubt, each
invasion, each conquest, each substitution of an industry or a culture had within it the impelling
contest of the spirit and will of man, the intelligence directing various industrial and warlike
implements, the superiority either of force or of mind.

Page 619

(1) Cartailhac, 1903.1, pp. 330, 331.
(2) Déchelette, 1908.1, vol. I, pp. 314-320.
(3) Op. cit., p. 320.
(4) Op. cit., pp. 505-510.
(5) Breuil, 1912.6, pp. 2-6.
(6) Ibid., 1912.7, pp. 232, 233.
(7) Ibid., 1912.6, p. 20.
(8) Koken, 1912.1, pp. 172, 173, 176-178, 180, 181, 201.
(9) Schmidt, 1912.1, p. 40.
(10) Breuil, 1912.7, p. 225.
(11) Op. cit., p. 233.
(12) Schmidt, 1912.1, p. 41.
(13) Schliz, 1912.1, pp. 242-244.
(14) Op. cit., p. 252.
(15) Boule, 1913.1, p. 210.
(16) Dupont, 1871.1.
(17) Fischer, 1913.1, p. 356.
(18) Breuil, 1912.5.
(19) Ibid., 1912.7, pp. 235, 236.
(20) Obermaier, 1912.1, pp. 467-469.
(21) Salmon, 1898.1.
(22) Munro, 1912.1, pp. 275-277.
(23) Déchelette, 1908.1, vol. I, p. 326.
(24) Breuil, 1912.5, p. 560.
(25) Ripley, 1899.1, p. 121.

Page 620

APPENDIX

NOTE I
LUCRETIUS AND BOSSUET ON THE EARLY EVOLUTION OF MAN
Lucretius's conception[BC] of the gradual development of human culture undoubtedly came from
Greek sources beginning with Empedocles. His indebtedness is beautifully expressed in the opening
lines of Book III of his De Rerum Natura:

"O Glory of the Greeks! who first didst chase
The mind's dread darkness with celestial day,
The worth illustrating of human life—
Thee, glad, I follow—with firm foot resolved
To tread the path imprinted by thy steps;
Not urged by competition, but, alone,
Studious thy toils to copy; for, in powers,
How can the swallow with the swan contend?
Or the young kid, all tremulous of limb,
Strive with the strength, the fleetness of the horse;
Thou, sire of science! with paternal truths
Thy sons enrichest: from thy peerless page,
Illustrious chief! as from the flowery field
Th' industrious bee culls honey, we alike
Cull many a golden precept—golden each—
And each most worthy everlasting life.
For as the doctrines of thy godlike mind
Prove into birth how nature first uprose,
All terrors vanish; the blue walls of heaven
Fly instant—and the boundless void throughout
Teems with created things."

The same conception[BD] of the early periods in the development of humanity is found in the
Histoire universelle of Bossuet, in a curious passage undoubtedly suggested by Lucretius:
"Tout commence: it n'y a point d'histoire ancienne où il ne paraisse, non seulement dans ces premiers
temps, mais encore longtemps après, des vestiges manifestes de la nouveauté du monde. On voit les
lois s'établir, les mœurs se polir, et les empires se former: le genre humain sort peu à peu de
l'ignorance; l'expérience l'instruit, et les arts sont inventés ou perfectionnés. A mesure que les
hommes se multiplient, la terre se peuple de proche en proche: on passe les montagnes et les
précipices; on traverse les fleuves et enfin les mers, et on établit de nouvelles habitations. La terre,
qui n'était au commencement qu'une forêt immense, prend une autre forme; les bois abattus font
place aux champs, aux pâturages, aux hameaux, aux bourgades, et enfin aux villes. On s'instruit à
prendre certains animaux, à apprivoiser les autres, et à les accoutumer au service. On eut d'abord à

Page 621

combattre les bêtes farouches: les premiers héros se signalèrent dans ces guerres; elles firent inventer
les armes, que les hommes tournèrent après contre leurs semblables. Nemrod, le premier guerrier et
le premier conquérant, est appelé dans l'écriture un fort chasseur. Avec les animaux, l'homme sut
encore adoucir les fruits et les plantes; il plia jusqu'aux métaux à son usage, et peu à peu il y fit
servir toute la nature."

NOTE II
HORACE ON THE EARLY EVOLUTION OF MAN
Horace[BE] also adopted the Greek conception of the natural evolution of human culture:

"Your men of words, who rate all crimes alike,
Collapse and founder, when on fact they strike:
Sense, custom, all, cry out against the thing,
And high expedience, right's perennial spring.
When men first crept from out earth's womb, like worms,
Dumb speechless creatures, with scarce human forms,
With nails or doubled fists they used to fight
For acorns or for sleeping-holes at night;
Clubs followed next; at last to arms they came,
Which growing practice taught them how to frame,
Till words and names were found, wherewith to mould
The sounds they uttered, and their thoughts unfold;
Thenceforth they left off fighting, and began
To build them cities, guarding man from man,
And set up laws as barriers against strife
That threatened person, property, or wife.
'Twas fear of wrong gave birth to right, you'll find,
If you but search the records of mankind.
Nature knows good and evil, joy and grief,
But just and unjust are beyond her brief:
Nor can philosophy, though finely spun,
By stress of logic prove the two things one,
To strip your neighbor's garden of a flower
And rob a shrine at midnight's solemn hour."

NOTE III
ÆSCHYLUS ON THE EARLY EVOLUTION OF MAN
Æschylus, in Prometheus Bound,[BF] presents one of the earliest known as well as one of the noblest
conceptions of the natural development of the human faculties:

Page 622

"And let me tell you—not as taunting men,
But teaching you the intention of my gifts,
How, first beholding, they beheld in vain,
And hearing, heard not, but, like shapes in dreams,
Mixed all things wildly down the tedious time,
Nor knew to build a house against the sun
With wicketed sides, nor any woodwork knew,
But lived, like silly ants, beneath the ground
In hollow caves unsunned. There came to them
No steadfast sign of winter, nor of spring
Flower-perfumed, nor of summer full of fruit,
But blindly and lawlessly they did all things,
Until I taught them how the stars do rise
And set in mystery, and devised for them
Number, the inducer of philosophies,
The synthesis of Letters, and, beside,
The artificer of all things, Memory
That sweet Muse-mother."

NOTE IV
'UROCHS,' OR 'AUEROCHS,' AND 'WISENT'
Kobelt[BG] discusses the habits of the wild cattle and of the bison as follows:
"One is inclined to consider the ancient wild cattle of Europe, the Urochs, or Auerochs, as the
inhabitants of boggy forests. The Auerochs survived to the seventeenth century in the forests of
Poland and then became extinct. It is described as of a black color with a light stripe along the back.
"The bison, or Wisent, is generally regarded as the inhabitant of the open steppe, or at least of dryer,
opener woods; it differs so little from the American bison that both can be considered only as races
of one species, the Bison priscus of Pleistocene times, which spread over the temperate zone of both
hemispheres. The American bison has always avoided the woods and roamed the prairies in
countless herds. But all reliable historic records describe the Wisent as a forest animal, and its few
remaining survivors are entirely limited to the forests. Apparently it was never so widely and
generally distributed as the Auerochs and reached western Europe later, for it is not found in the
north, and never in conjunction with the mammoth and rhinoceros. Remains of the bison have also
been found in Asia Minor. In Lithuania the bison lives together in herds, resenting the approach of
all strangers. In the Caucasus it lives wild in certain high valleys and here it is a true mountain
animal, its favorite haunts being the forests of beech, hornbeam, and evergreens from 4,000 to 8,000
feet above sea-level. Only in winter does it descend to lower levels. It is uncertain whether the
Wisent does not also occur in Siberia. Kohn and Andree assert positively that it is found in large
numbers in the wooded mountains of Sajan, in Siberia (1895)."
According to Kobelt, much confusion in the nomenclature of these animals has resulted from the
fact that, after the extinction of the 'Urochs,' or 'Auerochs,' in the seventeenth century, the term

Page 623

'Auerochs' was frequently used by writers as synonymous with 'Wisent,' or bison, an entirely
different animal.

NOTE V
THE CRÔ-MAGNONS OF THE CANARY ISLANDS[BH]
"In the museums of the Grand Canary, Teneriffe, and Palma a considerable number of prehistoric
vessels are preserved. Anthropologists are agreed that the natives of the archipelago at the time of its
conquest, in the fifteenth century, were a composite people made up of at least three stocks: a Crô-
Magnon type, a Hamitic or Berber type, and a brachycephalic type. These natives were in a
Neolithic stage of civilization. Their arms were slings, clubs, and spears. Most of the people went
naked, except for a girdle round the loins, and there was no intercommunication between the islands.
Their stone implements were of obsidian or of basalt. Only four polished axes are known from the
Grand Canary and one from Gomera. The axes are of chloromelanite, and of a type contemporary
with megalithic structures in France. The first colonists probably brought the knowledge of making
pottery with them, but each island developed an individuality of its own. Even the painted ware of
the Grand Canary appears to be of local origin and not due to external influence. Although
undoubted Lybian inscriptions in the Grand Canary and lava querns of Iron Age type prove that the
archipelago was visited before its conquest by the Spaniards without affecting the general
civilization of its inhabitants."

GUANCHE CHARACTERISTICS RESEMBLING CRÔ-MAGNON[BI]
The following excerpts are quoted from the account given by the distinguished anthropologist, Dr.
René Verneau, of his observations during a five years' residence in the Canary Islands.

Page 22.
"Without doubt the race that has played the most important rôle in the Canaries is the Guanche. They
were settled in all the islands, and in Teneriffe they preserved their distinctive characteristics and
customs until the conquest by Spain in the fifteenth century.
"The Guanches, who at that time were described as giants, were of great stature. The minimum
measure of the men was 1.70 m. (5 ft. 7 in.).
"I myself met a number of men in the various islands who measured over 1.80 m. (5 ft. 11 in.). Some
attained a height of 2 m. (6 ft. 6½ in.). At Fortaventure the average height of the men was 1.84 m. (6
ft. 3⁄10 in.), perhaps the greatest known in any people.
"It is a curious fact that the women who gave birth to such men were comparatively small—I
observed a difference of about 20 cm. (8 in.) in the heights of the two sexes.
"Their skin was light colored—if we may believe the poet Viana—and sometimes even absolutely
white. Dacil, the daughter of the last Guanche chief of Teneriffe, the valiant Bencomo, who
struggled so heroically for the independence of his country, had a very white complexion and her

Page 624

face was quite freckled. The hair of the true Guanche should be blond or light chestnut, and the eyes
blue.
"The most striking characteristic of the Guanche race was the shape of the head and the features of
the face. The long skull gave shape to a beautiful forehead, well developed in every way. Behind,
above the occipital, one notices a large plane contrasting strongly with the marked prominence of the
occipital itself. In addition, the parietal eminences, placed very high and very distinct from each
other, combined to give the head a pentagonal form."

Page 29.
"The Guanche chiefs were much respected. At Teneriffe the coronation of the chief took place in an
enclosure surrounded with stones (the Togaror), in the presence of nobles and people. One of his
nearest kinsmen brought him the insignia of power. According to Viera y Clavijo, this was the
humerus of one of his ancestors, carefully preserved in a case of leather; according to Viana, it was
the skull of one of his predecessors.
"The chief (Menceg) placed the relic on his head, pronouncing the sacramental formula: 'I swear
upon the bone of him who has borne this royal crown, that I will imitate his acts and work for the
happiness of my subjects.' Each noble, in turn, then received the bone from the hands of the chief,
placed it upon his shoulder and swore fidelity to his sovereign.... These chiefs led a very simple life:
their food was like that of the people, their apparel but little more elaborate, and their dwellings—
like those of their subjects—consisted of caves, only theirs were a little larger than those of the
common people. They did not disdain to inspect their flocks or their harvests in person, and were,
indeed, no richer than the average mortal."

Page 31.
"Above all, the ancient Canarians sought to develop strength and agility in their children. From an
early age the boys devoted themselves to games of skill in order to fit them to become redoubtable
warriors. The men delighted in all bodily exercises and, above all, in wrestling. At Gran Canaria
(Grande Canarie) they often held veritable tourneys, which were attended by an immense number of
people. These could not take place without the consent of the nobles and of the high priest.
"Permission obtained, the combatants presented themselves at the place of meeting. This was a
circular or rectangular enclosure, surrounded by a very low wall, allowing free view of the details of
the combat. Each warrior took his place upon a stone of about 40 cm. diameter (15½ in.). His
offensive weapons consisted of three stones, a club, and several knives of obsidian: his defensive
weapon was a simple lance. The skill of defense consisted in evading the stones by movements of
the body, or parrying the blows with the lance, without moving from the stone on which stand had
been taken. These combats often resulted fatally for one of the combatants."

Page 34.
"The Guanche understood the use of the sword, and although it was of wood (pine), it could cut, they
say, as if it were of steel.

Page 625

"To parry blows, they used a lance, as mentioned above, but they also had shields made of a round of
the dragon-tree (Dracæna draco).
"The Guanches were essentially shepherds. While their flocks pastured they played the flute, singing
songs of love or of the prowess of their ancestors. Those songs which have come down to us show
them to have been by no means devoid of poetic inspiration.
"When the care of their stock permitted, they employed their leisure in fishing. For this they
employed various means—sometimes nets, sometimes fish-hooks, sometimes a simple stick."

Page 47.
"The Guanches were above all troglodytes—that is to say, they lived in caves. There is no lack of
large, well-sheltered caves in the Canary Islands. The slopes of the mountains and the walls of their
ravines are honeycombed with them. The islanders may have their choice.
"The caves are almost never further excavated. They are used just as they are.
"Here is a description of one of these caves, the Grotto of Goldar:
"The interior is almost square—5 m. (16 ft. 4 in.) along the left side, 5.50 m. (18 ft.) along the right.
The width at the back is 4.80 m. (15 ft. 6 in.). A second cave, much smaller, opens from the right
wall. All these walls are decorated with paintings. The ceiling is covered with a uniform coat of red
ochre, while the walls are decorated with various geometric designs in red, black, gray, or white.
High up runs a sort of cornice painted red, and on this background, in white, are groups of two
concentric circles, whose centre is also indicated by a white spot. On the rear wall the cornice is
interrupted by triangles and stripes of red."

Page 61.
"The Guanches never polished their stone weapons."

Page 168.
"Inhabited caves are very numerous at Fortaventure. The population in certain parts—Mascona, for
example—must be quite numerous to judge by the number of these caves. At a little distance, in the
place known as Hoya de Corralejo, one may still see the Togaror, or tribal meeting place. It is an
almost circular enclosure about 40 m. (131 ft. 2 in.) in diameter, surrounded by a low wall of stones.
Six huts, from 2.50 to 4 m. (8 ft. 2½ in.—13 ft. 1½ in.) in diameter, designed no doubt for the sacred
animals, stood near the Togaror."

Page 245.
"A great number of Canarians still live in caves. Near Caldera de Bandama (Gran Canaria) there is a
whole village of cave dwellers."

Page 626

Page 264.
At Teneriffe Dr. Verneau received hospitality in a cabin worthy of the Palæolithic Age.
"I had no need to make any great effort to imagine myself with a descendant of those brave
shepherds of earlier times. My host was an example of the type—even though the costume was
lacking—and his dwelling completed the illusion. The walls, which gave free access to the wind,
supported a roof composed of unstripped tree trunks covered with branches. Stones piled on top
prevented the wind from tearing it off.
"Hung up on poles to dry were goatskins, destined to serve as sacks for the gofio (a kind of millet),
bottles for water, and shoes for the family. A reed partition shut off a small corner where the children
lay stretched out pell mell on skins of animals. For furniture, a chest, a hollowed-out stone which
served as a lamp, shells which served the same purpose, a water jar, three stones forming a hearth in
one corner, and that was all."
(And this host was the most important personage in the place.)

Page 289.
Another time, also at Teneriffe, Dr. Verneau had a similar experience.
"An old shepherd invited me to his house and offered me some milk. What was my surprise on
seeing the furnishing of his hut! In one corner was a bed of fern, near by a Guanche mill and a large
jar, in all points similar to those used by the ancient islanders. A reed flute, a wooden bowl and a
goatskin sack full of gofio completed the appointments of his home. I could scarcely believe my
eyes on examining the jar and the mill. Seeing my astonishment, the old man explained that he had
found them in a cave where 'the Guanches' lived, and that he had used them for many years. I could
not persuade him to part with these curiosities. To my offers of money he answered that he needed
none for the short time he had still to live."

NOTE VI
THE LENGTH OF POSTGLACIAL TIME AND THE ANTIQUITY OF THE AURIGNACIAN
CULTURE
The most recent discussion on the length of Postglacial time was that held at the Twelfth
International Congress of Geology, in Ottawa, in 1913 (Congrès Géologique International, Compte-
rendu de la XII Session, Canada, 1913, pp. 426-537). The notes abstracted by Dr. Chester A. Reeds
from the various papers are as follows:
"American estimates of Postglacial time have been made chiefly from the recession of waterfalls
since the final retreat of the great ice-fields in North America. The retreat of the Falls of St. Anthony,
Minnesota, has been estimated by Winchell at 8,000 years and by Sardeson at 30,000 years. The
retreat of the Falls of Niagara has been estimated as requiring from 7,000 to 40,000 years; it has
proved a very uncertain chronometer, because of the great variation in the volume of water at
different stages in its history. The recession of Scarboro Heights and other changes due to wave
action on Lake Ontario have been estimated by Coleman as requiring from 24,000 to 27,000 years.

Page 627

Fairchild has estimated that 30,000 years have elapsed since the ice left the Lake Ontario region of
New York.
"In Europe the most accurate chronology is that of Baron de Geer on the terminal moraines and
related marine clays of northern Sweden. For the retreat of the ice northward over a distance of 370
miles in Sweden 5,000 years were allowed; for the time since the disappearance of the ice in
Sweden, 7,000 years; for the retreat of the ice from Germany across the Baltic, 12,000 years; giving
a total of 24,000 years as compared with a total of between 30,000 and 50,000 years allowed by
Penck for the retreat of the ice-fields of the Alps."

NOTE VII
THE MOST RECENT DISCOVERIES OF ANTHROPOID APES AND SUPPOSED ANCESTORS
OF MAN IN INDIA
It is possible that within the next decade one or more of the Tertiary ancestors of man may be
discovered in northern India among the foot-hills known as the Siwaliks. Such discoveries have been
heralded, but none have thus far been actually made. Yet Asia will probably prove to be the centre of
the human race. We have now discovered in southern Asia primitive representatives or relatives of
the four existing types of anthropoid apes, namely, the gibbon, the orang, the chimpanzee, and the
gorilla, and since the extinct Indian apes are related to those of Africa and of Europe, it appears
probable that southern Asia is near the centre of the evolution of the higher primates and that we
may look there for the ancestors not only of prehuman stages like the Trinil race but of the higher
and truly human types.
As early as 1886 several kinds of extinct Old World primates, including two anthropoid apes related
to the orang and to the chimpanzee, were reported from the Siwalik hills in northern India, and
recently Dr. Pilgrim, of the Geological Survey, has described three new species of Siwalik apes
resembling Dryopithecus of the Upper Miocene of Europe, also an anthropoid which he has named
Sivapithecus and regards as actually related to the direct ancestors of man, a conclusion which may
or may not prove to be correct. Another extinct Indian ape, Palæopithecus, is of very generalized
type and is related to all the anthropoid apes.

NOTE VIII
ANTHROPOID APES DISCOVERED BY CARTHAGINIAN NAVIGATORS[BJ]
The Periplus of Hanno purports to be a Greek translation of a Carthaginian inscription on a tablet in
the "temple of Chronos" (Moloch) at Carthage, dedicated by Hanno, a Carthaginian navigator, in
commemoration of a voyage which he made southward from the Strait of Gibraltar along the
western coast of Africa as far as the inlet now known as Sherboro Sound, the next opening beyond
Sierra Leone.
Hanno is a very common Carthaginian name, but recent writers think it not improbable that this
Hanno was either the father or the son of that Hamilcar who led the great Carthaginian expedition to
Sicily in 480 B. C. In the former case the Periplus might be assigned to a date about 520 B. C.; in
the latter, some fifty years later.

Page 628

The narrative was certainly extant at an early period, for it is cited in the work on Marvellous
Narratives ascribed to Aristotle, which belongs to the third century B. C., and Pliny also expressly
refers to it. The authenticity of the work is now generally conceded.
According to the narrative the farthest limit of Hanno's voyage, which was undertaken for purposes
of colonization, brought him and his companions to an island containing a lake with another island
in it which was full of wild men and women with hairy bodies, called by the interpreters gorillas.
The Carthaginians were unable to catch any of the men but they caught three of the women, whom
they killed, and brought their skins back with them to Carthage. "Pliny, indeed, adds that the skins in
question were dedicated by Hanno in the temple of Juno at Carthage, and continued to be visible
there till the destruction of the city. There can be no difficulty in supposing these 'wild men and
women' to have been really large apes of the family of the chimpanzee, or pongo, several species of
which are in fact found wild in western Africa, and some of them, as is now well known, attain a
stature fully equal to that of man."

Page 629

BIBLIOGRAPHY

A
Agassiz, L.
1837.1 Discours prononcé à l'ouverture des séances de la Société Helvétique des Sciences Naturelles
à Neuchâtel le 24 Juillet, 1837, par L. Agassiz, Président. Actes, Soc. Helvétique, Sci. nat., 22e
Sess., 1837, pp. v-xxxii.
1840.1 Etudes sur les glaciers. Ouvrage accompagné d'un atlas de 32 planches. 8vo. Neuchâtel,
1840.
1840.2 On Glaciers and Boulders in Switzerland. Rept. 10th Meeting, Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci.,
Glasgow, 1840, pp. 113, 114 (Trans. Sections).
Alcalde del Rio, H.
1912.1 Les cavernes de la région cantabrique (Espagne). (With Breuil and Sierra.) See Breuil, H.,
1912.2.
1913.1 La Pasiega. (With Breuil and Obermaier.) See Breuil, H., 1913.1.
Anthony, R.
1910.1 L'encéphale de l'homme fossile de La Chapelle-aux-Saints. (With M. Boule.) C. R. Acad.
Sci., Paris, tome 150, 1910, pp. 1458-1461.
1911.1 L'encéphale de l'homme fossile de La Chapelle-aux-Saints. (With M. Boule.) See Boule, M.,
1911.1.
1912.1 L'encéphale de l'homme fossile de La Quina. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, tome 155, 1912, pp. 91-
93.
Arcelin, A.
1869.1 L'Age du Renne en Mâconnais, etc. (With Ferry, H.) See Ferry, H., 1869.1.
d'Ault du Mesnil, G.
1896.1 Note sur le terrain quaternaire des environs d'Abbeville. Rev. de l'Ecole d'Anthropol., Paris,
1896, année VI, pp. 284-296.
1898.1 L'Age de la Pierre. (With Salmon, P., et Capitan.) See Salmon, P., 1898.1.
Avebury, Lord (Sir John Lubbock).
1913.1 Prehistoric Times as Illustrated by Ancient Remains and the Manners and Customs of
Modern Savages. Seventh edition, thoroughly revised and entirely reset. (Henry Holt & Co.)
8vo, 1913.

Page 630

B
Bächler, E.
1912.1 Das Wildkirchli, die älteste prähistorische Kulturstation der Schweiz und ihre Beziehungen
zu den altsteinzeitlichen Niederlassungen des Menschen in Europa. Schr. Ver. für Geschichte
des Bodensees, Heft XLI.
Bardon, L.
1909.1 Découverte d'un squelette humain moustérien a la Bouffia de La Chapelle-aux-Saints
(Corrèze). (With Bouyssonie.) See Bouyssonie, A., 1909.1.
Bayer, J.
1912.1 Das geologisch-archäologische Verhältnis im Eiszeitalter. Zeitschr. für Ethnol., 44 Jahrgang,
Heft 1, 1912, pp. 1-22.
Bégouen, Le Comte.
1912.1 Les statues d'argile préhistoriques de la caverne du Tuc d'Audoubert (Ariège). C. R. Acad.
Inscrip. et Belles-Lettres, 1912, pp. 532-538.
1912.2 Une nouvelle grotte à gravures dans l'Ariège, la caverne du Tuc d'Audoubert. Congr.
Internat. d'Anthropol. et d'Archéol. préhist., XIVe Sess., Genève, 1912, pp. 489-497.
Berry, R. J. A.
1914.1 The Place in Nature of the Tasmanian Aboriginal as Deduced from a Study of his Calvaria.—
Part II, His Relation to the Australian Aboriginal. (With A. W. D. Robertson.) Proc. R. Soc.
Edinburgh, vol. XXXIV, part II, 1914, pp. 144-189.
Blackenhorn, M.
1911.1 Die Pithecanthropus-Schichten aus Java. (With Selenka, L.) See Selenka, L., 1911.1.
Bonarelli, G.
1909.1 Palæanthropus (n. g.) heidelbergensis (Schoet.). Perugia Riv. ital. Palaeont., vol. 15, 1909,
pp. 26-31.
Bonnet, R.
1914.1 Diluviale Menschenfunde in Obercassel bei Bonn. (With Verworn and Steinmann.) III, Die
Skelete. See Verworn, M., 1914.1.
Boucher [de Crèvecœur] de Perthes, J.
1846.1 Antiquités celtiques et antédiluviennes: Mémoire sur l'industrie primitive ou des arts à leur
origine. Tome I, 1846. Tome II, 1857. Tome III, 1864. Paris, 8vo.
Boule, M.

Page 631

1888.1 Essai de paléontologie stratigraphique de l'homme. Rev. d'Anthropol., 1888, sér. 3, tome III,
pp. 129-144, 272-297, 385-411, 647-680.
1899.1 Sur l'existence d'une faune d'animaux arctiques dans la Charente à l'époque quaternaire.
(With Chauvet, G.) C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, tome 128, pp. 1188-1190.
1905.1 L'origine des éolithes. L'Anthropol., tome XVI, 1905, pp. 1-11.
1906.1 Les Grottes de Grimaldi (Baoussé-Roussé). Tome I, fasc. II—Géologie et Paléontologie.
Publiées sous les auspices de S. A. S. Albert Ier, Prince de Monaco. Monaco, 4to.
1908.1 L'homme fossile de La Chapelle-aux-Saints (Corrèze). C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 1908, tome
147, pp. 1349-1352.
1908.2 L'homme fossile de La Chapelle-aux-Saints. L'Anthropol., tome XIX, 1908, pp. 519-525.
1909.1 L'homme fossile de La Chapelle-aux-Saints (Corrèze). L'Anthropol., tome XX, 1909, pp.
257-271.
1910.1 L'encéphale de l'homme fossile de La Chapelle-aux-Saints. (With R. Anthony.) C. R. Acad.
Sci., Paris, tome 150, 1910, pp. 1458-1461.
1910.2 Les Grottes de Grimaldi (Baoussé-Roussé). Tome I, fasc. III—Géologie et Paléontologie
(suite). Monaco, 1910.
1911.1 L'encéphale de l'homme fossile de La Chapelle-aux-Saints. (With R. Anthony.) L'Anthropol.,
tome XXII, 1911, pp. 129-196.
1912.1 La taille et les proportions du corps de l'Homo neanderthalensis. C. R. Inst. franc. Anthrop.,
1912, pp. 57-60.
1913.1 L'homme fossile de La Chapelle-aux-Saints. Ext. Ann. Pal., tome VI, 1911, pp. 111-172 [1-
64], Pl. XVII-XX [Pl. I-IV]; tome VII, 1912, pp. 21-192 [65-208], Pl. IV-XIX [Pl. V-XVI];
tome VIII, 1913, pp. 1-70 [209-278], Paris, 4to.
Bourgeois, l'Abbé.
1867.1 Découverte d'instruments en silex dans le dépôt à Elephas meridionalis de Saint-Prest, aux
environs de Chartres. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, tome 64, pp. 47, 48.
Bourrinet.
1906.1 L'Abri Mège, une station magdalénienne à Teyjat (Dordogne). (With Capitan, Breuil, and
Peyrony.) See Capitan, 1906.1.
1908.1 La grotte de la Mairie à Teyjat (Dordogne). Fouilles d'un gisement magdalénien. (With
Capitan, Breuil, and Peyrony.) See Capitan, 1908.1.
1912.1 Les gravures sur cascade stalagmitique de la grotte de la Mairie à Teyjat (Dordogne). (With
Capitan, L., Breuil, and Peyrony.) See Capitan, L., 1912.1.
Bouyssonie, les Abbés A. et J.
1909.1 Découverte d'un squelette humain moustérien à la Bouffia de La Chapelle-aux-Saints
(Corrèze). (With Bardon.) L'Anthropol., tome XIX, 1909, pp. 513-518.

Page 632

Breuil, l'Abbé H.
1906.1 L'Abri Mège, une station magdalénienne à Teyjat (Dordogne). (With Capitan, Bourrinet, and
Peyrony.) See Capitan, L., 1906.1.
1906.2 La caverne d'Altamira à Santillane près Santander (Espagne). (With Cartailhac.) See
Cartailhac, E., 1906.1.
1908.1 La grotte de la Mairie à Teyjat (Dordogne). Fouilles d'un gisement magdalénien. (With
Capitan, Bourrinet, and Peyrony.) See Capitan, 1908.1.
1908.2 Les peintures et gravures murales des cavernes pyrénéennes. (With Cartailhac.) See
Cartailhac, E., 1908.1.
1909.1 L'Aurignacien présolutréen. Épilogue d'une controverse. Rev. préhist., année 4, 1909, pp. 5-
46.
1909.2 Crânes paléolithiques façonnés en coupes. (With Obermaier, H.) L'Anthropol., tome XX,
1909, pp. 523-530.
1909.3 L'évolution de l'art quaternaire et les travaux d'Édouard Piette. Rev. Archéol., sér. 4, tome
XIII, pp. 378-411.
1910.1 La caverne de Font-de-Gaume aux Eyzies (Dordogne). (With Capitan and Peyrony.) See
Capitan, L., 1910.1.
1910.2 Les peintures et gravures murales des cavernes pyrénéennes. IV—Gargas, Cne. d'Aventignan
(Hautes-Pyrénées). (With Cartailhac.) See Cartailhac, E., 1910.1.
1911.1 L'abri sculpté de Cap-Blanc à Laussel (Dordogne). (With Lalanne.) L'Anthropol., tome XXII,
1911, pp. 385-408.
1912.1 L'âge des cavernes et roches ornées de France et d'Espagne. Rev. Archéol., tome XIX, 1912,
pp. 193-234.
1912.2 Les cavernes de la région cantabrique (Espagne). (With Alcalde del Rio, and R. P. K. Sierra.)
See Alcalde del Rio, 1912.1.
1912.3 Les gravures sur cascade stalagmitique de la grotte de la Mairie à Teyjat (Dordogne). (With
Capitan, L., Peyrony, and Bourrinet.) See Capitan, L., 1912.1.
1912.4 La statuette de mammouth de Předmost. (With Mas̆ ka and Obermaier.) See Mas̆ ka, 1912.1.
1912.5 Les peintures rupestres d'Espagne. (With Serrano Gomez and Cabre Aguilo.) IV—Les Abris
del Bosque à Alpéra (Albacete). L'Anthropol., tome XXIII, 1912, pp. 529-562.
1912.6 Les premiers travaux de l'Institut de Paléontologie humaine. (With Obermaier.) L'Anthropol.,
tome XXIII, 1912, pp. 1-27.
1912.7 Les subdivisions du paléolithique supérieur et leur signification. Congr. Intern. d'Anthrop.
d'Archéol. préhist., C. R., XIVe Sess., Genève, 1912, pp. 165-238.
1913.1 Travaux executés en 1912. (With Obermaier.) Travaux de I'Institut de Paléontologie humaine.
L'Anthropol., tome XXIV, 1913, pp. 1-16.

Page 633

1913.2 La Pasiega à Puente-Viesgo (Santander, Espagne). (With Obermaier and Alcalde del Rio.)
Peintures et gravures murales des cavernes paléolithiques. Institut de Paléontologie humaine.
Monaco, 4to, 1913.
Broca, P.
1868.1 Sur les crânes et ossements des Eyzies. Bull. Soc. d'Anthropol., Paris, sér. 2, tome III, pp.
350-392.
1875.1 Instructions craniologiques et craniométriques de la Société d'Anthropologie de Paris. Ext.
Mém. Soc. d'Anthropol., tome II, sér. 2, 203 pp., 6 Pls., Paris, Masson et Cie., 8vo., 1875.
Brückner, E.
1909.1 Die Alpen im Eiszeitalter. See Penck, A., 1909.1.
Büchner, L. W. G.
1914.1 A Study of the Curvatures of the Tasmanian Aboriginal Cranium. Communicated by
Professor R. J. A. Berry. Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh, vol. XXXIV, part II, 1914, pp. 128-143.
Buckland, W.
1823.1 Reliquiæ Diluvianæ; or, Observations on the Organic Remains contained in Caves, Fissures,
and Diluvial Gravel, and on Other Geological Phenomena, attesting the action of an Universal
Deluge. London, 4to, 1823.
Butler, S.
1911.1 Evolution, Old and New; or, the Theories of Buffon, Dr. Erasmus Darwin, and Lamarck, as
compared with that of Charles Darwin. With a Preface by R. A. Streatfield (dated October,
1911), New York (Dutton), 8vo.

C
Cabre Aguilo, J.
1912.1 Les peintures rupestres d'Espagne. (With Breuil and Serrano Gomez.) See Breuil, H., 1912.5.
Capitan, L.
1898.1 L'Age de la Pierre. (With Salmon, P., and d'Ault du Mesnil.) See Salmon, P., 1898.1.
1906.1 L'Abri Mège, une station magdalénienne à Teyjat (Dordogne). (With Breuil and Peyrony.)
Rev. de l'Ecole d'Anthropol., année VI, 1906, pp. 196-212.
1908.1 La grotte de la Mairie à Teyjat (Dordogne). (With Breuil, Bourrinet and Peyrony.) Fouilles
d'un gisement magdalénien. Rev. de l'Ecole d'Anthropol., année XVIII, 1908, pp. 153-173.
1910.1 La caverne de Font-de-Gaume aux Eyzies (Dordogne). (With Breuil and Peyrony.) Peintures
et gravures murales des cavernes paléolithiques publiées sous les auspices de S. A. S. le Prince
Albert Ier de Monaco. Monaco, 4to, 1910.

Page 634

1912.1 Les gravures sur cascade stalagmitique de la grotte de la Mairie à Teyjat (Dordogne). (With
Breuil, Peyrony, and Bourrinet.) Congr. Intern. d'Anthropol. et d'Archéol. préhist., C. R., XIVe
Sess., Genève, pp. 498-514.
1912.2 Station préhistorique de la Ferrassie, Commune de Savignac-du-Bugue (Dordogne). (With
Peyrony.) Rev. Anthropol., année XXI, no. 1, 1912, pp. 29-50.
Cartailhac, E.
1903.1 La France préhistorique d'après les sépultures et les monuments. Deuxième édition, avec 162
gravures dans le text. Paris, 8vo, 1903.
1906.1 La caverne d'Altamira à Santillane près Santander (Espagne). (With Breuil.) Peintures et
gravures murales des cavernes paléolithiques publiées sous les auspices de S. A. S. Prince
Albert Ier de Monaco. Monaco, 4to, 1906.
1908.1 Les peintures et gravures murales des cavernes pyrénéennes. (With Breuil.) III—Niaux
(Ariège). L'Anthropol., tome XIX, 1908, pp. 15-46.
1910.1 Les peintures et gravures murales des cavernes pyrénéennes. (With Breuil.) IV—Gargas,
Cne. d'Aventignan (Hautes-Pyrénées). L'Anthropol., tome XXI, 1910, pp. 129-150.
1912.1 Les Grottes de Grimaldi (Baoussé-Roussé). Tome II, fasc. II—Archéologie. Peintures et
gravures murales des cavernes paléolithiques publiées sous les auspices de S. A. S. Prince
Albert Ier de Monaco. Monaco, 4to, 1912.
Chamberlin, T.
1895.1 Glacial Studies in Greenland. III—Coast Glaciers between Disco Island and Inglefield Gulf.
Journ. Geol., vol. III, 1895, pp. 61-69.
1905.1 Geology. (With Salisbury, R. D.) American Science Series, Advanced Course, vols. I and II.
Second edition, revised, New York, 8vo, 1905.
de Charpentier, J.
1841.1 Essai sur les glaciers et sur le terrain erratique du bassin du Rhône. Lausanne, 8vo, 1841.
Chauvent, G.
1899.1 Sur l'existence d'une faune d'animaux arctiques dans la Charente à l'époque quaternaire.
(With Boule, M.) See Boule, M., 1899.1.
de Christol.
1829.1 Notice sur les ossemens humains fossiles des cavernes du département du Gard. Ext. [Acad.
Montpellier], 25 pp. et planche. Montpellier, 8vo, 1829.
Christy, H.
1875.1 Reliquiæ Acquitanicæ. (With Lartet, E.) See Lartet, E., 1875.1.
Collignon, R.
1890.1 L'anthropologie au conseil de revision; méthode à suivre. Son application à l'étude des
populations des Côtes-du-Nord. Bull. Soc. d'Anthropol., Paris, sér. 4, tome I, 1890, pp. 736-805.

Page 635

Commont, V.
1906.1 Les découvertes récentes à Saint-Acheul, l'Acheuléen. Rev. de l'Ecole d'Anthropol., Paris,
année XVI, 1906, pp. 228-241.
1908.1 Les industries de l'ancien Saint-Acheul. L'Anthropol., tome XIX, 1908, pp. 527-572.

1909.1 L'industrie moustérienne dans la region du nord de la France. Congr. Préhist. de France, Ve
Sess., 1909, pp. 115-157.
1909.2 Saint-Acheul et Montières. Notes de géologie, de paléontologie et de préhistoire. Mém. Soc.
Géol. du Nord, tome VI, iii.
1912.1 Moustérien à faune chaude dans la vallée de la Somme à Montières-les-Amiens. Congr.
Intern. d'Anthropol. et d'Archéol. préhist., C. R., XIVe Sess., Genève, 1912, pp. 291-300.
Cope, E. D.
1893.1 The Genealogy of Man. Amer. Nat., vol. XXVII, 1893, pp. 321-335.

D
Dana, J.
1875.1 Manual of Geology: Treating of the Principles of the Science with Special Reference to
American Geological History. Second edition, New York, 8vo, 1875.
Darwin, C.
1871.1 The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. Vols. I and II. London (Murray), 8vo,
1871.
1909.1 The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. Second edition, revised and enlarged,
New York (Appleton), 8vo, 1909.
1909.2 The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favored Races
in the Struggle for Life. With additions and corrections. From sixth and last English edition,
New York (Appleton), 8vo, 1909.
Dawkins, W. Boyd.
1880.1 Early Man in Britain and His Place in the Tertiary Period. London, 1880.
1883.1 On the Alleged Existence of Ovibos moschatus in the Forest-Bed, and on its Range in Space
and Time. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., London, 1883, vol. XXXIX, pp. 575-581.
Dawson, C.
1913.1 On the Discovery of a Palæolithic Human Skull and Mandible in a Flint-Bearing Gravel
overlying the Wealden (Hastings Beds) at Piltdown, Fletching (Sussex). With an Appendix by
Prof. G. Elliot Smith. (With A. S. Woodward.) Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., London, vol. LXIX,
part I, 1913, pp. 117-151, Pls. 15-21.

Page 636

1913.2 Prehistoric Man in Sussex. Zoologist, ser. 4, vol. 17, pp. 33-36.
1914.1 Supplementary Note; On the Discovery of a Palæolithic Human Skull and Mandible in a
Flint-Bearing Gravel, etc. (With A. S. Woodward.) With an Appendix by Prof. Grafton Elliot
Smith. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. LXX, 1914, pp. 82-99, Pls. 14, 15.
Déchelette, J.
1908.1 Manuel d'archéologie préhistorique celtique et gallo-romaine. Tome I—Archéologie
préhistorique (1908). Tome II—Archéologie celtique ou protohistorique. Première partie—Age
du Bronze (1910). Deuxième partie—Premier Age du Fer ou Epoque de Hallstatt (1913).
Appendices (1910). Appendices (Supplément) (1912). Paris, 8vo, 1910-1913.
Desnoyers, J.
1863.1 Note sur des indices matériels de la coexistence de l'homme avec l'Elephas meridionalis dans
un terrain des environs de Chartres, plus ancien que les terrains transport quaternaires des
vallées de la Somme et de la Seine. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, tome 56, 1863, pp. 1073-1083.
Dietrich, W. O.
1910.1 Neue fossile Cervidenreste aus Schwaben. Jahreshefte, Ver. vaterl. Naturk., Württemberg, 66
Jahrg., 1910, pp. 318-336.
Dubois, E.
1894.1 Pithecanthropus erectus, eine Menschenaehnliche Uebergangsform aus Java. Batavia, 4to,
1894.
Dupont, É.
1866.1 Etudes sur les fouilles scientifiques exécutées pendant l'hiver de 1865-1866 dans les cavernes
des bords de la Lesse. Bull. Acad. R. de Belgique, sér. 2, tome XXII, 1866, pp. 31-54.
1871.1 Les temps antéhistoriques en Belgique. L'homme pendant les âges de la pierre dans les
environs de Dinant-sur-Meuse. Deuxième édition. Bruxelles (Muquardt), 8vo, 1871.

E
Eccardus, J. G.
1750.1 De Origine et Moribus Germanorum eorumque vetustissimis colonis, migrationibus ac rebus
gestis. (Ioh. Guil. Schmidii), 4to, Goettingæ, ciↄ iↄ ccl (1750).
Elbert, J.
1908.1 Über das Alter der Kendeng-Schichten mit Pithecanthropus erectus Dubois. N. Jahrb.
Mineral. Géol. u. Pal., XXV Beil.-Bd., 1908, pp. 648-662.
Ewart, J. C.
1904.1 The Multiple Origin of Horses and Ponies. Trans. Highl. Agri. Soc. Scotland, 1904, pp. 1-39.

Page 637

1907.1 On the Skulls of Horses from the Roman Fort at Newstead, near Melrose, with Observations
on the Origin of the Domestic Horses. Trans. R. Soc. Edinburgh, vol. XLV, part III, no. 20,
1907, pp. 555-587.
1909.1 The Possible Ancestors of the Horses Living under Domestication. Science, n. s., vol. XXX,
no. 763, August 13, 1909, pp. 219-223.

F
de Ferry, H.
1869.1 L'Age du Renne en Mâconnais. Mémoire sur le gisement archéologique du clos du Charnier
à Solutré, Département de Saône-et-Loire. (Compte rendu des fouilles opérées en 1867 et 1868
par MM. H. de Ferry et A. Arcelin.) Trans. Intern. Congr. Préhist. Archéol., IIIe Sess., London,
1868 (published 1869), pp. 319-350, Pls. I, II.
Fischer, E.
1913.1 Fossile Hominiden. Sonderabd. Handwörterbuch Naturwiss., Bd. IV, pp. 332-360, Jena, 8vo,
1913.
Fraipont, J.
1887.1 La race de Neanderthal ou de Canstadt en Belgique. (With Lohest, M.) Arch. Biol., tome VII,
1887, pp. 587-757.
Fraunholz, J.
1911.1 Die Kastlhäng-Höhle, eine Renntierjägerstation im bayerischen Altmühltale. Mit einem
Beitrag von Max Schlosser. (With Obermaier.) Beiträge, Anthropol. u. Urgesch. Bayerns, Bd.
XVIII, 1911. (Unpaged separate.)

G
Gaudry, A.
1876.1 Matériaux pour l'histoire des temps quaternaires. Fasc. I. Paris, 4to, 1876.
1890.1 Le Dryopithèque. Mém. Soc. Géol. de France, Pal. Mém. no. 1. Paris, 4to, 1890.
Geikie, J.
1894.1 The Great Ice Age and Its Relation to the Antiquity of Man. Third edition, largely rewritten.
London, 8vo, 1894.
1914.1 The Antiquity of Man in Europe, being the Munro Lectures, 1913. Edinburgh, 8vo, 1914.
Godwin-Austen.

Page 638

1840.1 On the Geology of the Southeast of Devonshire. Trans. Geol. Soc., ser. 2, vol. VI, pp. 433-
489, Pl. XLII.
Gorjanovič-Kramberger, K.
1901.1 Der paläolithische Mensch und seine Zeitgenossen aus dem Diluvium von Krapina in
Kroatien. Mitt. Anthrop. Gesell. Wien, Bd. 31, pp. 163-197, 4 Pls., 13 Figs.
1903.1 Nachtrag (to the above). Mitt. Anthrop. Gesell. Wien, Bd. 32, pp. 189-216, 4 Pls., 17 Figs.
1906.1 Der diluviale Mensch von Krapina in Kroatien. Ein Beitrag zur Paläoanthropologie. Studien
über Entwicklungsmechanik des Primatskelettes mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der
Anthropologie und Descendenzlehre.... Herausgegeben von Dr. Otto Walkhoff, Wiesbaden, 4to,
1906.
1909.1 Der vordere Unterkieferabschnitt des altdiluvialen Menschen in seinem genetischen
Verhältnis zum Unterkiefer des rezenten Menschen und den der Anthropoiden. Zeitschr.
Abstammungs-u. Vererbungsl., Bd. I, pp. 411-439.

H
Harlé, E.
1899.1 Notes sur la Garonne. Bull. Soc. d'Hist. Nat. Toulouse, année XXXII (Oct., 1899), pp. 149-
198.
1908.1 Faune quaternaire de la province de Santandér (Espagne). Bull. Soc. Géol. de France, sér. 4,
tome VIII, 1908, pp. 82-83.
1910.1 Les mammifères et oiseaux quaternaires connus jusqu'ici en Portugal. Mémoire suivi d'une
liste générale de ceux de la Péninsule Ibérique. Ext. tome VIII, "Communicações," Service
Géol. du Portugal.
Haug, E.
1907.1 Traité de Géologie. Tome I—Les Phénomènes géologiques (1907). Tome II—Les Périodes
géologiques (1911). Paris, 8vo.
Hauser, O.
1909.1 Homo aurignacensis Hauseri, etc. See Klaatsch, H., 1909.1.
Heim, A.
1894.1 Ueber das absolut Alter der Eiszeit. Vierteljahrschrif. naturf. Gesell. Zurich, Bd. 39, 1894,
pp. 180-186.
Hilzheimer.
1913.1 Studienreise zu den paläolithischen Fundstellen der Dordogne. See Wiegers, 1913.1.
Hrdlička, Dr. A.

Page 639

1914.1 The Most Ancient Skeletal Remains of Man. Report, Smithsonian Institution, etc., 1913, pp.
491-552, Pls. 1-41. Publication 2300. Government Printing Office, Washington, 8vo, 1914.
Huntington, E.
1907.1 The Pulse of Asia. New York, 8vo, 1907.

J
James, W.
1902.1 The Varieties of Religious Experience. A Study in Human Nature. Being the Gifford Lectures
on Natural Religion delivered at Edinburgh in 1901-1902. New York, 8vo, 1902.
Johnson, J. P.
1913.1 The Stone Implements of the Tasmanians. Nature, vol. 92, no. 2298.

K
Keane, A. H.
1901.1 Ethnology. Cambridge Geographical Series. Stereotyped edition. Cambridge, 8vo. 1901.
Keith, A.
1911.1 Ancient Types of Man. Harper's Library of Living Thought. New York, 12mo. 1911.
1911.2 Discovery of the Teeth of Palæolithic Man in Jersey. Nature, vol. 86, no. 2169, May 25,
1911, p. 414.
1911.3 The Early History of the Gibraltar Cranium. Nature, vol. 87, no. 2184, September 7, 1911,
pp. 313, 314.
1912.1 Cranium of the Crô-Magnon Type found by Mr. W. M. Newton in a Gravel Terrace near
Dartford. Rpt. 82d Meeting, Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Dundee, 1912, pp. 516, 517.
1912.2 Hunterian Lecture on Certain Phases in the Evolution of Man. (Abstract.) Brit. Med. Journ.,
1912, vol. I, pp. 734-737, 788-790.
1913.1 The Piltdown Skull and Brain Cast. Nature, vol. 92, no. 2294, October 16, 1913, pp. 197-
199.
1913.2 The Piltdown Skull and Brain Cast. Nature, vol. 92, no. 2297, November 6, 1913, p. 292.
1913.3 The Piltdown Skull and Brain Cast. Nature, vol. 92, no. 2299, November 20, 1913, pp. 345,
346.
Kennard, A. S.

Page 640

1913.1 [Discussion of] On the Discovery of a Palæolithic Human Skull and Mandible ... at Piltdown,
Fletching (Sussex). See Dawson, C., 1913.1, p. 150.
King, W.
1864.1 The Reputed Fossil Man of the Neanderthal. Quart. Journ. Sci., vol. I, pp. 88-97, Pls. I, II.
Klaatsch, H.
1909.1 Homo aurignacensis Hauseri, ein paläolithischer Skeletfund aus dem unteren Aurignacien
der Station Combe-Capelle bei Montferrand (Périgord). (With Hauser.) Prähist. Zeitschr., Bd. I,
1909 (Heft 3-4, 1910), pp. 273-338.
Koken, E.
1912.1 Die diluviale Vorzeit Deutschlands, von R. R. Schmidt. II—Geologischer Teil von Ernst
Koken. Die Geologie und Tierwelt der paläolithischen Kulturstätten Deutschlands. See
Schmidt, R. R., 1912.1.
Kraemer, H.
Weltall und Menschheit. Geschichte der Erforschung der Natur und der Verwertung der Naturkräfte
im Dienst der Völker. Band II. Berlin, n. d.

L
Lalanne, G.
1911.1 L'abri sculpté de Cap-Blanc à Laussel (Dordogne). (With Breuil, H.) See Breuil, H., 1911.1.
Lamarck, J.
1809.1 Philosophie Zoologique. Paris (Duminil-Leseur), 8vo, 1909.
1815.1 Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres.... Tomes 1-7 (1815-1822). Paris (Verdière),
8vo, 1815-1822.
Lartet, E.
1861.1 Nouvelles recherches sur la coexistence de l'homme et des grands mammifères fossiles
réputés caractéristiques de la dernière période géologique. Ann. Sci. Nat., sér. 4, Zoologie, tome
XV, 1861, pp. 177-253, Pl. X.
1875.1 Reliquiæ Acquitanicæ. (With Christy.) Being Contributions to the Archæology and
Palæontology of Périgord and the Adjoining Provinces. Edited by Rupert Jones. London, 4to,
1875.
Leverett, F.
1910.1 Comparison of North American and European Glacial Deposits. Zeitschr. für Gletscherk., Bd.
IV, 1910, pp. 241-316.
Lubbock, Sir J. (See Avebury, Lord).

Page 641

1862.1 On the Evidences of the Antiquity of Man afforded by the Physical Structure of the Somme
Valley. Nat. Hist. Rev., 1862, pp. 244-269.
Lyell, Sir C.
1863.1 The Geological Evidences of the Antiquity of Man with Remarks on the Theories of the
Origin of Species by Variation. Second revised edition. London (Murray), 8vo, 1863.
1867.1 Principles of Geology or the Modern Changes of the Earth and Its Inhabitants Considered as
Illustrative of Geology. Tenth and entirely revised edition. Vol. I, 1867. Vol. II, 1868. London
(Murray), 8vo, 1867-1868.
1877.1 Principles of Geology or the Modern Changes of the Earth and its Inhabitants Considered as
Illustrative of Geology. Eleventh and entirely revised edition. Vol. I, 1877. Vol. II, 1872. New
York (Appleton), 8vo, 1872-1877.

M
MacCurdy, G. G.
1905.1 The Eolithic Problem. Evidences of a Rude Industry Antedating the Paleolithic. Amer.
Anthropol., n. s., vol. VII, no. 3, 1905, pp. 425-479.
Mahudel.
1740.1 Sur les prétendues pierres de foudre. Hist. Acad. R. Inscript. et Belles-Lettres, Paris, tome
XII, 1740, pp. 163-168.
Makowsky, A.
1892.1 Der diluviale Mensch im Löss von Brünn. Mitt. Anthropol. Gesell. Wien, Bd. XXII (N. F. Bd.
XIII), pp. 73-84.
Marett, R. R.
Anthropology. Home University Library of Modern Knowledge. New York (Henry Holt & Co.),
12mo, n. d.
Martin, H.
1910.1 Astragale humain du Moustérien moyen de La Quina. (Ext., Bull. Soc. préhist. de France,
1910, p. 391.) [Reviewed by M. Boule.] L'Anthropol., tome XXII, 1911, pp. 312, 313.
Martin, R.
1914.1 Lehrbuch der Anthropologie in systematischer Darstellung. Mit besonderer Berücksichtigung
der anthropologischen Methoden. Für studierende Ärzte und Forschungsreisende. Jena, 8vo,
1914.
Martins, C.
1847.1 Recherches sur la période glaciaire et l'ancienne extension des glaciers du Mont-Blanc depuis
les Alpes jusqu'au Jura. Rev. deux mondes 1847, tome 17, pp. 919-942.

Page 642

Maška, K.
1886.1 Fund des Unterkiefers in der Schipka-Höhle. Verh. Berliner Gesell. f. Anthropol., Ethnol. u.
Urgesch., 1886, pp. 341-350.
1912.1 La statuette de mammouth de Předmost. (With Obermaier and Breuil.) L'Anthropol., tome
XXIII, 1912, pp. 273-285.
Massénat, É.
1869.1 Objets gravés et sculptés de l'Augerie Basse (Dordogne). Matér. pour l'hist. de l'homme,
année V, sér. 2, pp. 348-356.
Morlot, A.
1854.1 Notice sur le Quaternaire en Suisse. Bull. Soc. Vaudoise, Sci. nat., 1854, pp. 41-45.
de Mortillet, A.
1869.1 Essai d'une classification des cavernes et des stations sous abri, fondée sur les produits de
l'industrie humaine. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, tome 68, 1869, pp. 553-555.
de Mortillet, G.
1872. Classification des âges de la pierre. Classification des diverses périodes de l'âge de la pierre.
C. R. Congr. Intern. d'Anthropol., d' Archéol. Préhist., VIe Sess. Bruxelles, 1872, pp. 432-444.
Munro, R.
1893.1 [On the Relation between the Erect Posture and the Physical and Intellectual Development of
Man.] Rpt. 63d Meeting, Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Nottingham, 1893, Presidential Address, Section
of Anthropology, pp. 885-889.
1912.1 Palæeolithic Man and the Terramara Settlements in Europe. Being the Munro Lectures in
Anthropology and Prehistoric Archæology in connection with the University of Edinburgh.
Edinburgh, 8vo, 1912.

N
Nehring, A.
1880.1 Übersicht über vierundzwanzig mitteleuropäische Quatär-Faunen. Zeitschr. deutsch. geolog.
Gesell., 1880, pp. 468-509.
1896.1 Die kleineren Wirbeltiere vom Schweizersbild bei Schaffhausen. N. Denkschr. allg. schweiz.
Gesell. gesam. Naturwiss., Bd. XXXV, 1896, pp. 40-77.
Neumeyer, M.
1890.1 Erdgeschichte. Band I, 1895. Band II, 1890. Leipzig, R. 8vo, 1890-1895.
Nicolle, E. T.

Page 643

1910.1 Report on the Exploration of the Palæolithic Cave-Dwelling known as La Cotte, St. Brelade,
Jersey. (With Sinel, J.) Man, 1910, nos. 101-102, pp. 185-188.
Niezabitowski, E.
1911.1 Die Überreste des in Starunia in einer Erdwachsgrube mit Haut und Weichteilen gefundenen
Rhinoceros antiquitatis Blum. (tichorhinus Fisch.). Bull. Acad. Sci. Cracovie, Classe des Sci.
Mathémat., etc., 1911, sér. B; Sci. nat., pp. 240-266.
Nüesch, J.
1902.1 Das Schweizersbild, eine Niederlassung aus palæolithischer und neolithischer Zeit. Die
praehistorische Niederlassung am Schweizersbild bei Schaffhausen. Die Schichten und ihre
Einschlüsse. N. Denkschr. allg. schweiz. Gesell. gesam. Naturwiss., Bd. XXXV, zweite
Verbesserung, pp. 1-120.

O
Obermaier, H.
1909.1 Crânes paléolithiques façonnés en Coupes. (With Breuil.) See Breuil, H., 1909.2.
1909.2 Les formations glaciaires des Alpes et l'homme paléolithique. L'Anthropol., tome XX, 1909,
pp. 497-522.
1909.3 Die Aurignacienstation von Krems (N.-O.). (With Strobel.) See Strobel, 1909.1.
1911.1 Die Kastlhäng-Höhle, eine Renntierjägerstation im bayerischen Altmühltale. (With Fraunholz
und Schlosser.) See Fraunholz, J., 1911.1.
1912.1 Der Mensch der Vorzeit. München, R. 8vo, 1912.
1912.2 Les premières travaux de l'Institut de Paléontologie humaine. (With Breuil.) See Breuil, H.,
1912.6.
1912.3 La statuette de mammouth de Předmost. (With Mas̆ ka et Breuil.) See Mas̆ ka, 1912.1.
1913.1 La Pasiega à Puente-Viesgo (Santander, Espagne). (With Breuil and Alcalde del Rio.) See
Breuil, H., 1913.2.
Osborn, H. F.
1894.1 From the Greeks to Darwin. An Outline of the Development of the Evolution Idea. New
York, 8vo, 1894.
1910.1 The Age of Mammals in Europe, Asia and North America. New York, 8vo, 1910.

P
Penck, A.

Page 644

1908.1 Das Alter des Menschengeschlechts. Zeitschr. für Ethnol., Jahrg. 40, Heft 3, 1908, pp. 390-
407.
1909.1 Die Alpen im Eiszeitalter. (With Brückner, E.) Band I, II, III. Leipzig, R. 8vo, 1909.
Peyrony, M.
1908.1 La grotte de la Mairie à Teyjat (Dordogne). (With Capitan and Breuil.) See Capitan, L.,
1908.1.
1910.1 La caverne de Font-de-Gaume aux Eyzies (Dordogne). (With Breuil and Capitan.) See
Capitan, 1910.1.
1912.1 Les gravures sur cascade stalagmitique de la grotte de la Mairie à Teyjat (Dordogne). (With
Breuil, Bourrinet, and Capitan.) See Capitan, 1912.2.
Piette, E.
1907.1 L'art pendant l'Age du Renne. Album de cent planches dessinées par J. Pilloy. Paris, small
folio, 1907.
Pilgrim, G.
1913.1 The Correlation of the Siwaliks with Mammal Horizons of Europe. Records, Geol. Survey
India, vol. XLIII, part 4, pp. 264-326, Pls. 26-28.

Q
Quatrefages, A.
1884.1 Hommes fossiles et hommes sauvages. Etudes d'Anthropologie. Paris, 8vo, 1884.

R
Reeds, C. A.
1915.1 The Graphic Projection of Pleistocene Climatic Oscillations. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., vol. 26,
no. 1, 1915, pp. 106-109.
Reid, C.
1908.1 The Pre-Glacial Flora of Britain. (With E. M. Reid.) Journ. Linn. Soc. Botany, vol. XXXVIII,
1908, pp. 206-227.
1913.1 [Discussion of] On the Discovery of a Palæolithic Human Skull and Mandible ... at Piltdown
... Sussex. See Dawson, C., 1913.1.
Reinach, S.
1889.1 Antiquités nationales. Déscription raisonnée du Musée de Saint-Germain-en-Laye. I—
Epoque des alluvions et des cavernes. Paris, 8vo [1889]. 322 pp.

Page 645

1913.1 Répertoire de l'Art quaternaire. Paris, 12mo, 1913.
Retzius, A.
1864.1 Ethnologische Schriften. III—Ueber die Form des Knochengerüstes des Kopfes bei
verschiedenen Völkern. Stockholm, 4to, 1864.
Rigollot.
1854.1 Mémoires sur des instruments en silex trouvées à Saint-Acheul. Amiens, 1854.
Ripley, W. Z.
1899.1 The Races of Europe. A Sociological Study. (Lowell Institute Lectures.) Accompanied by a
Supplementary Bibliography of the Anthropology and Ethnology of Europe, etc. New York,
8vo, 1899.
Rivière, E.
1897.1 La grotte de La Mouthe (Dordogne). Bull. Soc. d'Anthropol., Paris, sér. 4, tome VIII, 1897,
pp. 302-329; 484-490; 497-501.

1897.2 La grotte de La Mouthe (Dordogne). C. R. assoc. franç. pour l'avanc. sci., 26me Sess., Saint-
Etienne, 1897, pp. 669-687.
Robertson, A. W. D.
1914.1 The Place in Nature of the Tasmanian Aboriginal as Deduced from a Study of his Calvaria.
(With Berry, R. J. A.) See Berry, R. J. A.; 1914.1.
Rutot, A.
1902.1 Les industries primitives. Défense des éolithes. Les actions naturelles possibles sont inaptes à
produire des effets semblables à la retouche intentionelle. Bull. et Mém. Soc. Anthropol.,
Bruxelles, tome XX (1902), mém. III.
1907.1 A fin de la question des éolithes. Bull. Soc. Belge Géol., Procès-Verbal, 1907, tome XXI, pp.
211-217.
Rzehak, Prof. A.
1906.1 Der Unterkiefer von Ochos. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis des altdiluvialen Menschen. Verhandl.
naturf. Ver., Brünn, Bd. XLIV (1905), pp. 91-114. Published in 1906.

S
Salisbury, R. D.
1905.1 Geology. (With Chamberlin, T. C.) See Chamberlin, T., 1905.1.
Salmon, P.
1898.1 Age de la pierre: habitations néolithiques. (With d'Ault du Mesnil and Capitan.) Le
Campignien. Rev. de l'Ecole d'Anthropol., année VIII, 1898, pp. 365-408.

Page 646

de Sautuola, M.
1880.1 Breves apuntes sobre algunos objetos prehistóricos de la provincia de Santander. Madrid,
1880, 4 pl.
Schaaffhausen, D.
1857.1 Theilen des menschlichen Skelettes im Neanderthale bei Hochdal. Sitzungsber. niederrhein.
Gesellsch. f. Natur u. Heilkunde, Bonn, 1857, pp. xxxviii-xlii.
1858.1 Zur Kenntniss der ältesten Rassenschädel. Müller's Archiv, Jahrg. 1858, pp. 453-478.
Schliz, A.
1912.1 Die diluviale Vorzeit Deutschlands, von R. R. Schmidt. Teil III—Anthropologischer Teil. Die
diluvialen Menschenreste Deutschlands. See Schmidt, R. R., 1912.1.
Schlosser, M.
1911.1 Die Kastlhäng-Höhle, eine Renntierjägerstation im bayerischen Altmühltale. (With Fraunholz
und Obermaier.) See Fraunholz, 1911.1.
Schmerling, P.-C.
1833.1 Recherches sur les Ossemens Fossiles découvertes dans les cavernes de la province de Liége.
Liége, 4to, 1833.
Schmidt, R. R.
1912.1 Die diluviale Vorzeit Deutschlands. I—Archäologischer Teil: Die diluvialen Kulturen
Deutschlands, R. R. Schmidt. II—Geologischer Teil: Die Geologie und Tierwelt der
paläolithischen Kulturstätten Deutschlands, Ernst Koken. III—Anthropologischer Teil: Die
diluvialen Menschenreste Deutschlands, A. Schliz. Stuttgart, 4to, 1912.
Schoetensack, O.
1908.1 Der Unterkiefer des Homo heidelbergensis aus den Sanden von Mauer bei Heidelberg. Ein
Beitrag zur Paläontologie des Menschen. Leipzig, 4to, 1908.
Schuchert, C.
1913.1 Climates of Geologic Time. Reprint, Carnegie Inst. of Washington, Publication No. 192, pp.
263-298.
Schuchhardt, C.
1913.1 Paläolithische Fundstellen der Dordogne. (With Wiegers und Hilzheimer.) See Wiegers,
1913.1.
Schwalbe, G.
1897.1 Ueber die Schädelformen der ältesten Menschenrassen mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des
Schädels von Egisheim. Mitt. Philomat. Gesell. Elsass-Lothringen, Jahrg. 5 (1897), Heft III, pp.
72-85.

Page 647

1899.1 Studien über Pithecanthropus erectus Dubois. Zeitschr. f. Morph. u. Anthropol., Bd. I, Heft I,
pp. 16-22, Pls. I-III.
1901.1 Der Neanderthalschädel. Bonner Jahrb., no. 106, Bonn, pp. 1-72.
1901.2 Über die specifischen Merkmale des Neanderthalschädels. Verh. Anat. Gesell., Bonn, 1901,
pp. 44-61.
1904.1 Die Vorgeschichte des Menschen. Braunschweig, 8vo, 1904.
1906.1 Das Schädelfragment von Brüx und verwandte Schädelformen. Zeitschr. für Morphol. und
Anthropol., Sonderheft, 1906, pp. 81-182, Pls. I-II.
1914.1 Kritische Besprechung von Boule's Werk: "L'homme fossile de La Chapelle-aux-Saints" mit
eigenen Untersuchungen. Zeitschr. Morph. u. Anthropol., Bd. XVI, Heft 3, pp. 527-610.
1914.2 Über einen bei Ehringsdorf in der Nähe von Weimar gefundenen Unterkiefer des Homo
primigenius. Anat. Anzeiger, Band 47, nos. 13-17. Oktober, 1914, pp. 337-345.
Selenka, L.
1911.1 Die Pithecanthropus-Schichten auf Java. (With Blanckenhorn.) Geologische und
paläontologische Ergebnisse der Trinil-Expedition (1907-1908). Herausgegeben von M. Lenore
Selenka und Prof. Max Blanckenhorn, Leipzig, 4to, 1911.
Serrano Gomez, P.
1912.1 Les peintures rupestres d'Espagne. (With Breuil and Cabre Aguilo.) See Breuil, 1912.5.
Sierra, R. P. L.
1912.1 Les cavernes de la région cantabrique (Espagne). (With Alcalde del Rio and Breuil.) See
Alcalde del Rio, 1912.1.
Smith, G. E.
1912.1 Presidential Address to the Anthropological Section (B. A. A. S.). Rpt. 82d Meeting, Brit.
Assoc. Adv. Sci., Dundee, 1912, pp. 575-598.
1913.1 The Controversies concerning the Interpretation and Meaning of the Remains of the Dawn-
Man Found near Piltdown. [Abstract.] Meet. Manchester Lit. and Philosoph. Soc., November
18, 1913.
1913.2 On the Discovery of a Palæolithic Human Skull and Mandible in a Flint-Bearing Gravel
overlying the Wealden (Hastings Beds) at Piltdown, Fletching (Sussex). With an Appendix by
Prof. Grafton Elliot Smith. See Dawson, C., 1913.1.
1913.3 The Piltdown Skull. Nature, vol. 92, no. 2292, October 2, 1913, p. 131.
1913.4 The Piltdown Skull and Brain Cast. Nature, vol. 92, no. 2296, October 30, 1913, pp. 267,
268.
1914.1 Supplementary Note on the Discovery of a Palæolithic Human Skull and Mandible at
Piltdown (Sussex). (With Dawson and Woodward.) With an Appendix by Prof. Grafton Elliot
Smith. See Dawson, C., 1914.1.

Page 648

Smith, W.
1894.1 Man the Primeval Savage. His Haunts and Relics from the Hill-Tops of Bedfordshire to
Blackwall. London, 8vo, 1894.
Sollas, W. J.
1900.1 Evolutional Geology. Presidential Address to the Geological Section (B. A. A. S.). Rpt. 70th
Meeting, Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Bradford, 1900, pp. 711-730.
1911.1 Ancient Hunters and Their Modern Representatives. London, 8vo. 1911.
1913.1 Paviland Cave: An Aurignacian Station in Wales. (The Huxley Memorial Lecture for 1913.)
Journ. R. Anthropol. Inst. of Gr. Brit. & Ireland, vol. XLIII, 1913, pp. 325-373.
Steinmann, C.
1914.1 Diluviale Menschenfunde in Obercassel bei Bonn. (With Verworn and Bonnet.) IV—Über
das geologische Alter der Fundstelle. See Verworn, M., 1914.1.
Strobel, J.
1909.1 Die Aurignacienstation von Krems (N.-Ö.). (With Obermaier, H.) Mit einem Anhang von
Oskar von Troll. Jahrb. Altertumskunde, Bd. III, 1909, pp. 129-148, Pls. XI-XXI.

T
Tomes, C. S.
1914.1 A Manual of Dental Anatomy, Human and Comparative. Edited by H. W. Marett Tims and A.
Hopewell-Smith. Seventh edition. (J. and A. Churchill.) London, 8vo, 1914, 616 pp.
von Troll, O.
1909.1 Die Aurignacienstation von Krems (N.-Ö.). (With Strobel and Obermaier.) Mit einem
Anhang von Oskar von Troll. See Strobel, J., 1909.1.

U
Upham, W.
1893.1 Estimates of Geologic Time. Amer. Journ. Sci., vol. XLV, 1893, pp. 209-220.

V
Verneau, R.
1886.1 La race de Crô-Magnon. Rev. Anthropol., sér. 3, tome I, 1886, pp. 10-24.

Page 649

1891.1 Cinq années de séjour aux îles Canaries. Paris, 1891.
1906.1 Les Grottes de Grimaldi (Baoussé-Roussé). Tome II, fasc. I—Anthropologie. Monaco, 4to,
1906.
Verworn, M.
1914.1 Diluviale Menschenfunde in Obercassel bei Bonn. (With Bonnet and Steinmann.) I—
Fundbericht, Verworn. II—Die Kulturstufe des Fundes, Verworn. III—Die Skelete, Bonnet. IV
—Über das geologische Alter der Fundstelle, Steinmann. Die Naturwissenschaften, Heft 27,
Jahrg. 2, 3 Juli 1914, pp. 645-650.
de Vibraye.
1864.1 Note sur des nouvelles preuves de l'existence de l'homme dans le centre de la France à une
époque où s'y trouvaient aussi divers animaux qui de nos jours n'habitent pas cette contrée. C.
R. Acad. Sci., Paris, tome 58, 1864, pp. 409-416.
Villeneuve, L.
1906.1 Les Grottes de Grimaldi (Baoussé-Roussé). Tome I, fasc. I—Historique et Déscription.
Monaco, 4to, 1906.
Volz, W.
1907.1 Das geologische Alter der Pithecanthropus-Schichten bei Trinil, Ost-Java. N. Jahrb. Miner.,
Geol. u. Paläontol., Festband, 1907, pp. 256-271.

W
Walcott, C. D.
1893.1 Geologic Time as Indicated by the Sedimentary Rocks of North America. Amer. Geol., vol.
XII, no. 6, 1893, pp. 343-368, Pl. XV.
Wiegers, F.
1913.1 Eine Studienreise zu den paläolithischen Fundstellen der Dordogne. (With Schuchhardt and
Hilzheimer.) Zeitschr. f. Ethnol., Jahrg. 45, Heft I, 1913, pp. 126-160.
Wilser, L.
1898.1 Menschenrassen und Weltgeschichte. Naturwiss. Wochenschr., Band XIII, Heft I, 1898.
Woodward, A. S.
1913.1 On the Discovery of a Palæolithic Human Skull and Mandible in a Flint-Bearing Gravel
overlying the Wealden (Hastings Beds) at Piltdown, Fletching, Sussex. (With Dawson, C.) With
an Appendix by Prof. Grafton Elliot Smith. See Dawson, C., 1913.1.
1914.1 Supplementary Note on the Discovery of a Palæolithic Human Skull and Mandible at
Piltdown (Sussex). (With Charles Dawson.) With an Appendix by Prof. Grafton Elliot Smith.
See Dawson, C., 1914.1.

Page 650

1914.2 On the Lower Jaw of an Anthropoid Ape (Dryopithecus) from the Upper Miocene of Lérida
(Spain). Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., London, vol. LXX, pp. 316-320, Pl. XLIV.
1915.1 A Guide to the Fossil Remains of Man in the Department of Geology and Palæontology in
the British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London, S. W. With 4 plates and 12
text-figures. Printed by order of the trustees of the British Museum. 8vo, 1915, 33 pp.

Page 651

INDEX

INDEX[BK]

Page 652

A
Abbeville, 109, 116, 124, 125, 127, 149, 152, 156, 166, 167, 244, 331

Abri Audit, 245, 246, 248, 255, 269, 277, 305, 307, 309, 311, 314

Abri Dufaure, 471

Abri Mège, 435, 442

Abris, see Rock Shelters

Achenheim, 30, 160, 161, 167, 176, 195, 284, 314

Achenschwankung, see Postglacial Stage

Acheulean, 14-16, 18, 30;
chronology, 33, 41, 89;
climate, 112, 117, 118, 165, 166, 173, 174, 175-177, 186;
fauna, 144-148, 165;
geography (physical), 166;
human fossils, 24, 181-185;
industry, 14, 16, 18, 41, 108, 113, 122-124, 169-173, 177-180, 270, 280,
362;
stations, 151, 158-162, 166-169;
see Origin

Æschylus, on the prehistory of man, 3, 505

Aggsbach, 29, 435, 448

Agriculture, 2, 486, 496

Aiguille, needle, 271, 310, 313, 387, 388, 391, 392, 440, 443-445, 449, 461,
462

Page 653

Alactaga jaculus, 373, 374;
see Jerboa

Alces, 187, 287, 369;
latifrons, 70, see Moose

Alento, 167

Alpera, 469, 497

Alpine fauna, see Fauna

Alpine race, 278, 458, 479, 480, 481, 484, 485, 491, 499, 500

Alpine vole, 371, see Arvicola nivalis

Altamira, 17, 319, 321, 331, 332, 346, 368, 385, 394, 395, 399, 408, 415,
416, 422-427, 434, 435, Pl. VIII

Ancestry of Man, see Man

Ancona, 167

Andernach, 160, 195, 279, 372, 378, 435

Anthropoid Apes, 3, 21;
ancestry, 49-61;
brain, 52-60;
compared with Grimaldi, 266,
with Neanderthal, 9, 217, 230-233, 237-240,
with Piltdown, 140, 141,
with Pithecanthropus, 9, 77-79;
known to Carthaginians, 511, 512;
recent discoveries, 511

Anthropology, rise of, 3-10

Page 654

Antilope saiga, see Saiga antelope

Anvils, bone, 211, 253, 256, 271;
see Compresseur

Apes, see Anthropoid

Arboreal life, effects of, 56, 57

Archæology, rise of, 10-18

Archer, 329

Arctomys marmotta, 182, 370;
see Marmot

Arcy-sur-Cure, 214, 219, 435

Argali sheep, 46, 285, 287, 371;
see Ovis argaloides

Arrow, 214, 258, 270, 272, 344, 353, 354, 410, 450, 497

Art, 13, 14, 17, 21, 315-330, 332, 347-350, 392-434, 449, see Aurignacian,
Magdalenian, Solutrean, Engraving, Painting, Sculpture, Industry;
implements used in, 270, 309-312, 321, 329, 330, 385, 396, 415, 463;
means of dating, 317-320

Arudy, 435, 436

Arvicola, amphibius, 147;
gregalis, 373;
nivalis, 370, 371

Ascoli Piceno, 167

Ass, wild (kiang), see Horse

Page 655

Aurensan, 435, 438, 471

Aurignac, 5, 13, 14, 16, 275, 279, 290, 294, 314

Aurignacian, 14-16, 18, 275, 276;
art, 315-330, 403, 404, 408;
burial customs, 302-305;
chronology, 33, 41, 351;
climate, 123, 281-286;
fauna, 285-289;
human fossils, 289-305;
industry, 16, 18, 41, 108, 269-271, 275-277, 280, 305-313, 329, 330, 362;
stations, 275, 283, 284, 289, 307, 313-315;
see Origin

Aurignacian race, see Combe-Capelle man

Aurochs, see Bos primigenius and Cattle

Australian head type, 136, 228, 232, 234

Awl, see Poinçon

Axe, 493, 494

Azilian, see Azilian-Tardenoisian

Azilian-Tardenoisian, 16, 275, 451, 456;
art, 456;
burial customs, 475-479;
chronology, 275, 456, 459;
climate, 463, 468;
fauna, 463, 466, 468-470, 471, 472, 474;
human fossils, 461, 475-485;
industry (Azilian), 15, 16, 18, 270, 271, 275, 276, 456, 459-465, 466,
470-475,

Page 656

(Tardenoisian) 16, 18, 270, 271, 450, 456, 465-468, 470-472,
(painted pebbles) 394, 456, 461, 463-465;
stations, 459, 463, 466, 467, 472-475;
see Origin

B
Badegoule, 279, 331, 336, 435

Badger, 165, 201, 343, 367, 447, 498;
see Meles taxus

Ballahöhle, 279, 331, 336

Baltic race, 458, 486, 500;
see Maglemose

Balverhöhle, 471

Baoussé Roussé, see Grimaldi, Grottes de

Baousso da Torre, see Grimaldi, Grottes de

Barma Grande, see Grimaldi, Grottes de

Bâton de commandement, 271, 311, 312, 345, 358, 359, 388, 391, 432, 443-
445, 449

Baumannshöhle, 160, 195, 245, 247, 248, 439

Bear, 43, 44, 62, 95, 96, 165, 213, 245, 264, 287, 288, 333, 343, 348, 367,
378, 430, 441, 447, 461, 468, 498;
see Cave-bear and Ursus

Beaver, 63, 95, 134, 165, 182, 288, 348, 367, 447, 461, 468, 498, see
Castor;

Page 657

giant, III, 155, see Trogontherium

Bernifal, 321, 395, 396, 435

Billancourt, 109, 149, 152

Bison, Wisent, 13, 43, 44, 69, 71, 95, 98, 106, 125, 147, 165, 192, 194, 196,
202, 206, 211, 223, 287, 288, 317, 321, 333, 348, 353, 356, 364, 368, 372,
385, 403, 405, 406, 410, 414, 420, 421, 423-428, 430, 431, 449, 466, 469,
496, 498, 505, 506, Pls. VII and VIII;
see Bison

Bison, antiquus, 69;
priscus, 71, 95, 148, 368, see Bison

Blade, see Couteau and Lame

Bléville, 167

Boar, wild, 2, 3, 43, 44, 76, 95, 264, 265, 421, 426, 447, 461, 466, 468, 498;
see Sus

Bockstein, 285, 314, 435, 442

Bois Colombes, 109, 149, 152

Borer, drill, see Perçoir

Bos, 71, 369, 405;
longifrons, 498;
primigenius, 71, 94, 222, 368, 413, 468, 469, 498;
taurus, 447, 498;
see Cattle

Bossuet, on the prehistory of man, 503, 504

Brachycephaly, 7, 8, 78, 183, 457, 458, 478-485

Page 658

Brain, anthropoid, 51, 52, 56, 59;
Brünn, 334, 490;
Combe-Capelle, 236, 302, 490;
Crô-Magnon, 272, 292, 294, 299, 490;
evolution of, 8, 9, 56-60;
Grimaldi, 269, 490;
Modern, 56-59, 83, 84, 140, 235, 303, 490;
Neanderthal, 9, 58, 59, 235-237, 490;
Ofnet, 480, 490;
Piltdown, 58, 59, 139-141, 236, 490;
Pithecanthropus 9, 58, 59, 83, 84, 490

Brassempouy, 14, 279, 314, 322, 331, 347, 355, 393, 395, 433-435, 438

Brive, 307, 314

Bronze Age, 12, 18, 21, 202, 267, 460, 461, 476

Bruniquel, 279, 348, 388, 427, 435, 436

Brünn, 279, 315, 322, 331, 334-337, 395, Pl. II;
race, 23, 257, 276, 278, 302, 331, 333, 334-338, 480, 489-491, 500;
see Brüx, Galley Hill, Předmost, Human fossils, and Origin

Brüx, 334;
see Brünn race

Buchenloch, 245, 314, 435

Buffon, G. L. L., 3

Bühl, see Postglacial Stage

Burial customs, 24, 215, 221-223, 270, 271, 302, 303-305, 337, 376-380,
475-479

Page 659

Burin, graver, 270, 306-308, 310, 386, 389, 470

C
Cabeço da Arruda, 467, 471, 474

Camargo, 279, 294, 314, 331, 435

Campignian, 493-495

Campigny, 471;
see Campignian

Camps, open, 29, 30, 176, 283, 284, 314, 334, 337, 341-343, 442, 448

Canary Islands, 453, 454, 506-510

Canis, lagopus, 193, 206, see Fox, arctic;
neschersensis, 333;
suessi, 147;
see Dog, Jackal, and Wolf

Cannibalism, 184, 477

Cannstatt, 10, 105, 218, 220, 331

Cap-Blanc, 317, 395, 428, 431, 435

Capreolus, 70, 147, 367, 469;
see Deer, roe-

Capri, 167, 168

Caramanico, 167

Castillo, 33, 150, 162-165, 167, 245, 246, 279, 314, 319, 320, 324, 325,

Page 660

331, 342, 349, 395, 402, 408, 435, 436, 459, 460, 471

Castor, 69;
fiber, 147, 183, 470;
see Beaver

Cattle, wild (Aurochs, Urochs, urus), 43, 44, 62, 66, 76, 95, 98, 106, 119,
125, 148, 165, 182, 192, 206, 211, 214, 245, 265, 284, 288, 325, 333, 348,
356, 368, 372, 392, 405, 413, 461, 466, 468, 469, 497, 498, 505, 506;
see Bos and Leptobos

Cave-bear, 10, 11, 13, 182, 194, 197, 201, 202, 206, 210, 211, 212, 213,
218, 287, 401, 413;
see Ursus spelæus

Cave-hyæna, 11, 212, 218, 265, 287, 288;
see Hyæna crocuta spelæa

Cave-leopard, 206, 287;
see Felis pardus spelæa

Cave-lion, 201, 206, 265, 287;
see Felis leo spelæa

Caverns, 24;
formation of, 30-33, 212;
life in, 2, 30, 32, 211-213, 457

Cavillon, Grotte de, see Grimaldi, Grottes de

Cazelle, 435

Cephalic index, 8, 480, 490

Ceppagna, 167

Cergy, 109, 149, 152

Page 661

Cervus, carnutorum, 71;
dama, 498;
dicranius, 71;
elaphus, 70, 94, 147, 367, 392, 426, 461, 469;
maral, 367, 447;
sedgwicki, 69, 71;
see Deer and Stag

Chaffaud, Grotte du, 396, 404, 435, 438

Chaleux, Trou de, 435

Chamois, Rupicapra, 44, 46, 201, 264, 265, 357, 365, 366, 369, 371, 466

Champs, 435, 436

Champs Blancs, 331, 348, 435

Chancelade, 279, 376-378, 382, 435

Chapelle-aux-Saints, La, 7, 9, 203, 214, 222-224, 226-232, 235-238, 241-
243, 245, 246

Châtelperron, 305, 307, 314;
see Pointe

Chellean, 14-16, 18;
chronology, 33, 34, 113-115, 120;
climate, 117, 118;
fauna, 144-148;
geography (physical), 115, 116, 154-157;
industry, 12, 14, 16, 18, 41, 108, 114, 148-154, 270, 280, 362;
stations, 149, 152, 154-158;
see Origin

Chelles, 16, 109, 111, 116, 149, 152, 154, 167, 244

Page 662

Chimpanzee, 3, 8, 49, 52-56, 58, 59, 78, 140, 227, 231, 235, 490, 511, 512

Chipping, see Flint

Chisel, see Ciseau

Chronology, 10, 12-14, 16, 18-24, 41, 510;
tables, 18, 21, 22, 23, 33, 41, 43, 54, 108, 280, 362, 395, 491;
means of estimating, 19, 20, 22-24, 317-320

Ciseau, chisel, 270, 271, 388, 392, 444

Climate, effect on fauna, 46, 47, 192, 194, 205, 284-287;
effect on man, 33, 297, 332, 372, 382;
glacial, 20, 29, 34, 37-43, 64-66, 89, 104, 105, 114, 117, 188-194, 202,
205, 281, 285;
interglacial, 20, 29, 30, 33, 34, 37-41, 43, 67, 90, 91, 95, 103, 112, 117,
118, 186-188;
Pliocene, 63;
Postglacial, 23, 41, 43, 276, 281-284, 361-363

Clothing, 2, 178, 186, 213, 388, 392, 496

Cogul, 394, 497

Colombes, 109, 149, 152

Combarelles, 319, 395-397, 399-401, 435

Combe-à-Roland, 331

Combe-Capelle, 167, 192, 196, 197, 199, 211, 245, 248, 249, 252, 253, 255,
279, 314;
man (Homo aurignacensis), 302, 303, 338

Combo-Negro, 435, 436

Page 663

Compresseur, 271;
see Anvils

Continental outline, 19, 34-37, 64, 65, 71, 86, 92, 105, 115, 116, 155, 156,
166, 189, 190, 281, 282, 288, 362

Cotte de St. Brelade, La, 214, 225, 245

Cottés, Les, 213, 314

Coup de poing, 113, 114, 121, 129, 130, 152-154, 169-173, 177-180, 222,
251-254, 256, 270

Couteau (knife, blade), 130, 172, 177, 180, 270, 306, 308, 310, 386, 389,
488, 494

Crayford, 198, 245

Créteil, 109, 149, 152

Cricetus phæus, 373, 374;
see Hamster

Crô-Magnon, 279, 291, 314, 331, 437, Pl. II;
man, 7, 273, 279, 291-294, 300, 301;
race, 7, 23, 54, 240, 257, 258, 260, 261, 263, 265-276, 278, 280-282,
284, 289-305, 336, 351, 358, 376-382, 434, 440, 443, 449-454, 457-459,
489-492, 499, 500, 506-510, Pl. VII

Cromer, Forest Bed of, 64, 67, 68, 71

Crosle Biscot, 435

Crouzade, 331, 341, 435, 437

Culture, see Industry

Page 664

Cyon alpinus fossilis, 201

D
Dart-thrower, see Propulseur

Daun, see Postglacial Stage

Deer, 44, 125, 134, 245, 265, 356, 426, see Cervus;
Axis, 62, 71, 76, 102;
fallow, 265, 469, 497, see Cervus dama;
giant, 43, 94, 96, 165, 187, 206, 211, 213, 288, 335, see Megaceros;
polycladine, 63, 102, see Cervus dicranius and sedgwicki;
red, 44, 287, 426, 447, see Cervus elaphus and Stag;
roe-, 44, 94, 95, 165, 264, 265, 287, 404, 447, 466, 468, 488, 498, see
Capreolus;
rusa, 76

Dicerorhinus (R.), antiquitatis, 46, 106, 285, see Rhinoceros, woolly;
etruscus, 41, 63, 69, see Rhinoceros, Etruscan;
merckii, 41, 92-94, 117, 148, 263, see Rhinoceros, Merck's

Dog, domestic, 474, 486, 488, 497, 499

Dolichocephaly, 7, 8, 78, 220, 230, 231, 266, 268, 334, 336, 338, 457, 478-
481

Domestic Animals, 447, 466, 474, 486, 488, 497-499

Drill, see Perçoir

Dryopithecus, 6, 49, 50, 511

Dürnten, 20, 117, 119

Page 665

Dürntenian, 107, 119

Duruthy, see Sorde

E
Ehringsdorf, 167, 181, 214

Elasmothere, E. sibiricum, 46, 286, 373

Elephant, 38, 43, 44, 47, 72, 76, 86, 91-95, 102, 117, 119, 123, 124, 147,
148, 155, 157, 161, 174, 177, 186, 187, 192, 205, 245, 264;
see Elephas

Elephas, antiquus, 27, 41, 47, 72, 76, 92-94, 96, 117, 123, 125, 148, 165,
263;
hysudricus, 76;
meridionalis, 26, 27, 41, 62, 69, 72, 92, 125;
planifrons, 62;
primigenius, 26, 46, 106, 285;
trogontherii, 41, 93, 102, 117;
see Elephant and Mammoth

Elevation, see Continental outline

Enfants, Grotte des, see Grimaldi, Grottes de, and Grimaldi race

Engis, 435, 453

Engraving, 317, 319-324, 326, 348, 349, 353, 355, 356, 358, 392-407

Eoanthropus dawsoni, 138, see Piltdown

Eolith, 11, 68, 84-86, 135

Eolithic, Era, 17, 18;

Page 666

industry, 17

Equus, caballus celticus, 367-369, 400, 408, 412, 419, 431, 432, 498;
przewalski, 194, 367, 373, 408, 410, 419;
stenonis, 27, 62, 63, 69, 72;
see Horse

Erect attitude, 4, 57-60, 73, 74, 82, 241-244

Ermine, Mustela erminia, 46, 207, 370, 447, 469

Etruscan rhinoceros, see Rhinoceros

Eyzies, Les, 13, 249, 279, 331, 378, 388, 394, 435

F
Fate, Grotte delle, 245, 247

Fauna, 19-21, 38-47, 61-64, 66, 69, 108;
Acheulean, 117, 147, 148, 165, 177, 182;
African-Asiatic, 43, 44, 47, 62, 63, 71, 72, 86, 91-94, 205, 206, 287;
alpine, 44, 46, 206, 287;
Aurignacian, 284-289;
Azilian-Tardenoisian, 466, 468-470, 472;
Chellean, 117, 125, 144-148;
forest, 44, 71, 206, 287;
glacial, 105, 106, 117, 190-194, 196, 197, 205-214, 265;
interglacial, 69-72, 91-98, 101-103, 108-112, 117, 119, 123-125, 186-
188, 265;
Magdalenian, 364-376, 385, 397-434, 449, 466, 469;
meadow, 44, 71, 206, 287;
Mousterian, 117, 186-188, 190-194, 196, 197, 199-214, 218, 221-223,
225, 263, 264;
Pliocene, 54, 61-64, 144;
Postglacial, 281, 364, 468, 469, 498, 499;

Page 667

Pre-Chellean, 108-112, 117, 125;
Siwalik, 76;
Solutrean, 332, 333, 343, 348;
steppe, 44, 46, 194, 206, 281, 287, 362-366, 373-376, 449, 450;
tundra, 44, 46, 190-194, 206-211, 281, 285, 287, 348, 361, 362-366, 370-
373;
migrations of, 19, 34-37, 62-64, 71, 72, 202, 205-210, 287;
represented in Palæolithic art (list), 366;
see Climate, for effect of, and Faunal lists

Faunal lists, 95, 125, 147, 206, 207, 287, 366

Faune chaude, 39, 91, 192;
see Mousterian fauna

Faune froide, see Mousterian fauna

Faustkeil, see Coup de poing

Fées, Grotte des, 279, 435

Felis, leo, 72, 92, 469;
leo antiqua, 147;
leo spelæa, 47, 188;
manul, 447;
pardus spelæa, 201;
see Cave-leopard, Cave-lion, Leopard, Lion, and Wildcat

Femur (thigh-bone), 73, 74, 77, 80, 237-241, 266, 298, 376, 380

Fère-en-Tardenois, 16, 465, 471

Ferrassie, La, 7, 214, 216, 219, 224, 232, 237, 245, 246, 269

Fire, use of, 2, 165, 212, 213

First Glacial Stage, see Glacial Epoch

Page 668

First Interglacial Stage, see Glacial Epoch

Fishing, 355, 385, 390, 450, 465, 471

Flake, see Levallois

Flaking, see Flint

Flint, chipping, 170;
cleavage, 171;
flaking, 169

Floors, Mousterian, 198, 199

Flora, 20;
Acheulean, 117, 118, 174, 175;
Chellean, 117, 118;
glacial, 65, 108, 117-119, 191, 192, 202, 208;
interglacial, 20, 67, 90, 91, 117-119;
Mousterian, 199;
Pliocene, 61, 63;
Postglacial, 361, 372, 375, 463, 488;
Pre-Chellean, 117, 118;
Pre-Neolithic, 488

Font-de-Gaume, 283, 314, 318, 319, 321, 325, 331, 349, 356, 358, 365,
372, 395-397, 399, 406-409, 412, 414-424, 435, 449

Font Robert, 277, 311, 314, 331, 340, 344

Forestian, Upper, 362;
Lower, 282

Forests, see Flora

Foro, 167

Page 669

Fourth Glacial Stage, see Glacial Epoch

Fox, 43, 63, 71, 206, 265, 287, 333, 343, 348, 366, 447, 498, see Vulpes;
arctic, 44, 46, 193, 207, 287, 289, 348, 370, 447, 468, 469, see Canis
lagopus.

Freudenthal, 279, 435

Frileuse, 167

Frontal, Trou de, 435

Fuente del Frances, 435

Furfooz, 7, 279, 481-483, Pl. II;
race, 278, 458, 480, 482-485, 489, 491, 492, 500;
see Grenelle, Ofnet, and Origin

Furninha, 167, 168

G
Galley Hill, 28, 302, 337, 338;
see Brünn race

Gansersfelsen, 435

Garenne, 435, 440

Gargano, 167

Gargas, 31, 307, 314, 317, 325, 327, 349, 394, 395

Germolles, 307, 314

Page 670

Gibbon, 49-54, 58, 61, 63, 77, 511;
see Hylobates

Gibraltar skull, 7, 9, 140, 214, 215, 216, 219, 226, 228, 232, 233, 236

Glacial Epoch, 18-23, 33, 40, 41, 43, 54;
chronology, 18-23, 40, 41, 108, 188, 280, 362;
see Climate, Continental outline, Fauna, Glaciers;
First Glacial Stage (Günz), 23, 25, 26, 37, 38, 41, 43, 64-66;
Second Glacial Stage (Mindel), 23, 25, 26, 33, 37, 38, 41, 43, 65, 86-90;
Third Glacial Stage (Riss), 23, 25, 26, 33, 37-39, 41, 43, 94, 104-106,
115;
Fourth Glacial Stage (Würm), 18, 22, 23, 25, 26, 30, 32, 33, 36-38, 41,
43, 107, 108, 117, 160, 188-195, 205, 206, 280, 281, 284, 285, 362,
Laufenschwankung, 41, 108, 280, 362;
First Interglacial Stage (Günz-Mindel or Norfolkian), 23, 26, 29, 33-35,
38, 41, 43, 66-72, 84, 95, 115;
Second Interglacial Stage (Mindel-Riss), 23, 25, 29, 33, 38, 40, 41, 43,
69, 90-95, 109-111, 114, 115;
Third Interglacial Stage (Riss-Würm), 23, 25, 29, 33, 34, 36, 38-41, 43,
69, 94, 107, 108, 112, 113, 115-119, 186-188, 280, 362;
Postglacial Stage, 18-23, 29, 32, 33, 36, 41, 43, 108, 280-284, 362, 468,
510,
Bühl, 23, 25, 26, 41, 108, 276, 280, 281, 361, 362, 370, 372, 446, 447,
449,
Gschnitz, 23, 41, 108, 276, 280, 281, 362, 363, 372, 449, 450,
Daun, 23, 41, 108, 276, 280, 281, 362, 363,
Achenschwankung, 25, 26, 281, 282, 284

Glaciers, 64-66, 89, 90, 94, 104-106, 118, 189, 190, 361-363

Glutton, see Gulo luscus and Wolverene

Gobelsburg, 435, 448

Goccianello, 167, 168

Page 671

Gorge d'Enfer, 331, 435

Gorilla, 49, 52, 54-56, 511, 512

Goulaine, 435, 438

Gourdan, 214, 279, 331, 341, 369, 388, 392, 435, 438

Goyet, 435

Grattoir, 129, 130, 177, 254, 270, 306-310, 386, 390, 470, 473, 494;
caréné, 308, 309, 463

Graver, see Burin

Gravette, etching tool, 270

Gravette, La, 277, 311, 314

Gray's Thurrock, 28, 109, 116, 128, 149, 152, 156, 157

Greek conception of nature and of the prehistory of man, 1-3

Grenelle, 279, 481, 482, 484;
race, see Furfooz

Grèze, La,

Page 672

314, 317, 327, 331, 395, 396

Grimaldi, Grottes de (Baoussé Roussé), 245, 247, 262-265, 279, 294, 295,
312-314, 321, 323, 380;
Baousso da Torre, 263, 294;
Barma Grande, 263, 294;
Cavillon, Grotte de, 263, 294;
Enfants, Grotte des, 263-265, 292, 294-297, see Grimaldi race;
Prince, Grotte du, 262, 263

Grimaldi race, 7, 19, 245, 260, 262-269, 278, 279, 294, 301, 314, 490-492

Gschnitz, see Postglacial Stage

Guanches, 453-455, 507-510

Gudenushöhle, 245, 248, 279, 307, 314, 435, 448

Gulo luscus, 469;
borealis, 193;
see Wolverene

Günz, see Glacial Epoch

H
Hachette (tranchette, chopper, cleaver), 270, 488, 494

Hammer-stone, see Percuteur

Hamster, 46, 63, 147, 165, 287, 362, 364, 374

Hand-axe, see Coup de poing

Hand-stone, see Coup de poing

Page 673

Hare, 289, 333, 368, 447, 468, 498, see Lepus (timidus);
arctic, 46, 207, 287, 348, 370, 447, 468, 469, see Lepus variabilis;
tailless, see Lagomys and Pika

Harpoons, 355, 383-385, 387, 388, 390, 391, 440, 443-445, 449, 450, 456,
460-462, 465, 466, 470, 474, 486, 487

Hastings, 471, 475

Heidelberg man, Mauer, 7, 23, 24, 40, 41, 53, 54, 90, 95-101, 114, 138, 143,
144, 214, 228, 229, 489, 491, 492, Pl. II

Heidelberg race, see Heidelberg man and Origin

Helin, 109, 116, 127, 128, 149, 152, 166, 167

Helvetian, see Dürntenian

Hermida, La, 435

Hippopotamus, H. major, 38, 39, 41, 43, 44, 47, 69, 71, 86, 91, 92-94, 102,
117, 123-125, 134, 147, 148, 155, 157, 165, 174, 177, 186, 192, 199, 263,
264

Höhlefels bei Hütten, 435, 442

Höhlefels bei Schelklingen, 435, 442

Hohlestein, 314, 435

Hommes, Grotte des, 279, 435

Homo, aurignacensis, see Combe-Capelle man;
heidelbergensis, see Heidelberg man;
mousteriensis, see Neanderthal race;
neanderthalensis, see Neanderthal race;

Page 674

sapiens, 7, 9, 10, 54, 230-234, 257, 260, 261, 278, 334, 484, 490, 491,
500

Horace, on the prehistory of man, 3, 504

Hornos de la Peña, 245-247, 314, 331, 395, 435, 436

Horse, 45, 165, 182, 192, 225, 284, 355, 385, 392, 404, 405, 407, 408, 410,
412-414, 431, 432, 469, 498;
Desert, Plateau or Celtic, see Equus caballus celticus;
Forest or Nordic, 95, 147, 288, 289, 367, 369, 400, 498;
Hipparion, 63;
kiang or wild ass, 194, 285-287, 366, 367, 372-374, 400, 447;
Solutré, 288, 289, 414;
Steno's, 34, 96, 110, 111, 125, see Equus stenonis;
Steppe, see Equus przewalski

Hôteaux, Les, 279, 378, 379, 435

Hoxne, 158

Human figures, 317, 321-323, 328, 329, 337, 357, 393, 395, 399, 433, 434,
497

Human fossils, 4, 11;
distribution of, 214, 279;
tables of, 7, 219, 294, 336, 378, 490;
see Lists

Human races, see Lists and Origin

Hunting, 2, 11, 166, 202, 211-214, 283, 372, 456, 471, 496, 497

Hyæna, 43, 62, 76, 110, 147, 148, 155, 165, 188, 214, 245, 265, 317, 356,
476;
see Cave-hyæna and Hyæna

Page 675

Hyæna, brevirostris, 125;
crocuta, 102, 147;
crocuta spelæa, 47, 102, 188;
striata, 92, 102;
see Hyæna

Hylobates, 6;
see Gibbon

I
Ibex, Ibex priscus, 44, 46, 201, 206, 264, 265, 287, 289, 321, 348, 357, 369,
371, 391, 401, 405, 433, 447, 466, 469, 497

Ice Age, see Glacial Epoch

Ice-fields, 19, 22;
see Glaciers

Implements, 11, 27-30, 130, 270, 271;
art, 270, 329, 330;
see Eolith, Flint, Industry, Lists, Neolith, Palæolith

Industry, 4, 11, 12-14, 19, 33, see Acheulean, Aurignacian, Azilian-
Tardenoisian, Chellean, Campignian, Magdalenian, Mousterian, Neolithic,
Pre-Chellean, Solutrean;
see Lists and Implements

Interglacial Stages, see Glacial Epoch

Iron Age, 12, 18, 21, 202, 267

Irpfelhöhle, 245, 248

Istein, 469, 471-473

Page 676

Isturitz, 347, 395

J
Jackal, 43, 44;
see Canis neschersensis

Javelin point, see Sagaie

Jerboa, 46, 194, 287, 364;
see Alactaga jaculus

K
Kärlich, 314

Kartstein, 245, 248, 314, 435

Kastlhäng, 370, 435, 442

Kent's Hole, 10, 152, 244, 245, 435, 440

Kesslerloch, 279, 286, 355, 361, 364, 378, 383, 435, 436, 441, 442, 444-
446, 449

Kiang, wild ass, see Horse

Kleinkems, 471

Knife, blade, see Couteau and Lame

Knight, Charles R., see Restorations

Kostelìk, 435, 448

Page 677

Krapina, 7, 162, 167, 181-185, 214, 219, 220, 228, 229, 256

Krems, 119, 248, 289, 307, 314, 435, 448

L
Lacave, 279, 331, 340, 345, 347, 391

Lagomys, 63;
pusillus, 202, 370, see Pika

Lagopus, see Ptarmigan

Lamarck, on man, 4

Lame, blade, 271

Lampe, lamp, 270, 401, 402

Laufenschwankung, see Glacial Epoch

Laugerie Basse, 13, 14, 275, 279, 331, 348, 376-378, 385, 388, 392, 407,
434, 435, 471

Laugerie Haute, 13, 14, 279, 294, 296, 314, 331, 346, 352, 435

Laussel, 245, 246, 249, 275, 313, 314, 317, 326-329, 331, 352, 395, 435

Lauterach, 314

Lemming, 46, 191, 193, 194, 202, 207, 281, 287, 333, 348, 361, 364, 370,
469, 476;
see Myodes

Leopard, 265, 348;

Page 678

see Cave-leopard and Felis pardus spelæa

Leptobos, 71;
elatus, 62;
etruscus, 63;
see Cattle

Lepus, 469;
cuniculus, 364, see Rabbit;
timidus, 364, see Hare;
variabilis, 206, see Hare, arctic

Levallois, 167, 179

Levallois flake, 167, 168, 179, 180, 199, 250, 251

Limeuil, 279, 435

Lion, 43, 86, 94-96, 98, 148, 165, 188, 281, 317, 348, 356, 365, 378, 400,
407, 446, 468, 472, 498;
see Cave-lion and Felis leo

Lissoir, polisher, smoother, 270, 271, 380, 388, 392, 456, 463, 466, 470

Lists and Tables, chronology, 18, 21, 22, 23, 33, 41, 54, 108, 280, 362;
climatic changes, 38, 39, 41, 43, 117, 191, 192, 275, 281, 284, 361-364;
fauna, 21, 41, 43, 54, 62, 95, 125, 147, 206, 207, 287;
human fossils, 7, 9, 219, 236, 237, 239, 266, 294, 295, 336, 378, 490;
human races, 41, 54, 108, 278, 280, 362, 458, 490, 491, 499, 500;
industries, divisions of, 18, 113, 114, 248, 249, 252, 340, 389;
succession of, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 33, 41, 108, 280, 362;
implements, 130, 172, 254, 270, 271, 306, 308, 310

Liveyre, 331, 435

Loam, 5, 24, 27, 28

Page 679

Loess, 5, 23-25, 29, 30, 36, 38, 46, 97, 103, 112, 115, 117-119, 122-124,
151, 159, 161, 162, 174, 176, 181, 252, 281, 282, 284, 286, 314, 334, 337,
364, 376, 442, 448;
stations, see Camps, open

Longueroche, 435, 471

Lorthet, 406, 407, 435, 438, 471

Lourdes, 279, 388, 432, 435, 436, 438, 471

Lower Rodent Layer, see Rodent Layers

Lucretius on the prehistory of man, 1, 2, 503

Lussac, 279, 435

Lutra vulgaris, 147;
see Otter

Lynchus lynx, 469;
see Lynx

Lynx, 43, 63, 206, 287, 367, 466;
see Lynchus lynx

M
Macaque, 54, 61, 63, 69, 76

Macerata, 167

Machærodus, 41, 69, 244;
see Sabre-tooth tiger

Madeleine, La, 13, 16, 279, 351, 383-389, 398, 435, 443, 445, 449, 471

Page 680

Magdalenian, 14-16, 18, 276, 277, 351-360;
art, 351-357, 365, 366, 393, 395-434;
burial customs, 376-380;
chronology, 18, 33, 41, 108, 276, 280, 281, 351, 361-364;
climate, 276, 360-364, 370-376, 443, 447, 449, 450;
fauna, 361-376, 443, 445-447, 449, 450;
human fossils, 376-382;
industry, 14-16, 270, 271, 275, 276, 351-356, 358, 382-392, 436, 440,
443-450;
stations, 351, 434-449;
see Origin and Rodent Layers

Maglemose, 458, 471, 487, 488, 501

Magrite, Trou, 314, 331, 344, 435

Mairie, Grotte de la, 317, 395, 400, 405, 412, 413, 435, 442

Malarnaud, 214, 219

Mammoth, 10, 43, 102, 109, 117, 134, 147, 148, 177, 187, 194, 200, 202,
205, 206, 213, 218, 281, 288, 289, 316, 317, 321, 324-326, 333, 337, 348-
350, 356, 364, 372, 385, 401, 403, 420, 421, 427, 429, 449, 450, 476, see
Elephas;
woolly, 13, 40, 41, 43, 106, 117, 174, 187, 190-192, 196, 205, 207, 208,
210, 218, 221, 285-289, 334, 335, 363, 370, 372, 384, 397, 398, 420, 427,
446, see Elephas primigenius

Man, ancestry of, 3-7, 49-64, 491, 511

Mantes-la-Ville, 167

Marcilly-sur-Eure, 214

Mare-au-Clercs, La, 167

Page 681

Marignac, 109, 126, 149, 152

Markkleeberg, 167

Marmot, Arctomys marmotta, 182, 201, 206, 265, 370

Marsoulas, 314, 319, 321, 328, 373, 394, 395, 396, 399, 403, 405, 415, 416,
435, 471, 485

Marten, 71, 165, 201, 265, 367, 380, 447, 498;
see Mustela martes

Martinshöhle, 435, 471

Mas d'Azil, 15, 16, 279, 319, 357, 375, 380, 385, 388, 391-396, 432, 433,
435, 437, 449, 458-465, 471, 472, 474

Massat, 437, 471

Mastodon, 62, 70, 134

Maszycka, 435, 436, 449

Mauer, see Heidelberg man

McGregor, J. Howard, see Restorations

Mediterranean race, 261, 278, 457, 458, 479, 480, 485, 489, 491, 492, 499,
500

Megaceros, 45, 68, 70, 106, 147, 182, 196, 287, 367;
see Deer, giant

Meles taxus, 147;
see Badger

Mentone, 247, 322, 395, 472, 473;

Page 682

see Grimaldi, Grottes de

Merck's Rhinoceros, see Dicerorhinus and Rhinoceros

Mesaticephaly, 8, 479

Metternich, 284, 314

Micoque, La, 113, 167, 168, 179, 192, 196, 245, 246, 248, 249

Microlith, see Microlithique

Microlithique, microlith, 270, 306, 308, 310, 388, 396, 450, 470-472

Migration, of fauna, see Fauna;
of human races and industries, see Origin

Mindel, see Glacial Epoch

Miskolcz, 245, 248, 331

Mommenheim, 245, 247, 248

Monkeys, 54, 61-63

Montconfort, 279, 331, 435

Montfort, 341, 471

Monthaud, 331, 346

Montières, 109, 127, 149, 152, 186, 244, 245, 283, 314, 331

Moose, 44, 94, 96, 265, 281, 348, 366, 468, 469, 472, 488, 496-498;
see Alces

Moulin-de-Laussel, 331

Page 683

Mousterian, 14-16, 18, 30, 186-188, 248-250;
burial customs, 222, 223, 271;
chronology, 18, 33, 41, 108, 280, 362;
climate, 117, 123, 188-199, 202, 205, 207;
fauna, 117, 190-194, 196, 199-214;
flora, 199;
human fossils, 218-226;
industry, 14-16, 113, 248-256, 270, 271;
stations, 194-202, 244-248;
see Caverns, life in, Floors, and Origin

Moustier, Le, 13, 16, 196-199, 214, 245, 246, 251, 253, 255;
man, 7, 196, 214, 221-223, 226, 228, frontispiece

Mouthe, La, 17, 246, 279, 314, 317, 320, 321, 394, 395, 398, 399, 401

Mugem, 471, 474, 486

Munzingen, 160, 195, 435, 439, 442, 443

Murals, see Painting

Musk-ox, 42-44, 46, 65, 66, 187, 191, 193, 207, 285, 287, 289, 348, 362,
366, 370;
see Ovibos moschatus

Mustela, erminea, see Ermine;
martes, 147, 469, see Marten.

Myodes, lemmus, 210;
obensis, 206, 285, 370;
torquatus, 193, 202, 206, 285, 370, 441, 446, 447;
see Lemming

N

Page 684

Narbonne, 435, 437

Naulette, La, 7, 214, 221, 228

Neanderthal, cave, 31, 214, 216, 217, Pl. II;
burial customs, see Mousterian;
man, 5, 7, 9, 56, 181, 216-219, 490;
race, frontispiece, 5-7, 9, 23, 40, 41, 54, 136, 182, 191, 196, 211-244,
256, 258, 263, 272, 491, 492,
anatomical features, 53-56, 183, 184, 203, 219-223, 226-244, 490,
chronology, 41, 108, 257, 262, 280, 491,
compared with Crô-Magnon, 297, 298,
discoveries, 181-185, 215-226,
distribution of, 214, 219;
see Origin

Necklace, 302, 304, 376, 378, 437, 472

Needle, see Aiguille

Negroid race, 261, 262, 266-269, 278, 301, 302, 321, 492

Neolith, 11, 496

Neolithic, New Stone Age, 10, 13, 18, 19, 21, 41, 108, 280, 362, 447, 482,
484-486, 488, 493-501

Neopithecus, 49

Neschers, 245, 435, 438

Niaux, 314, 319, 353, 373, 391, 394, 395, 400, 406, 409-411, 412, 429, 435

Niedernau, 370, 435

Norfolkian, see First Interglacial Stage and Forest Bed of Cromer

Page 685

Nutons, Trou des, 435

O
Oban, 474, 475, 486

Obercassel, man, 7, 279, 353, 378, 380-382, 435, 443

Oberlarg, 435

Ochos, 214, 219, 221, 228, 245, 248

Ofnet, 279, 285, 314, 331, 370, 435, 469, 471, 473, 475-481;
races, 442, 457-460, 480, 481, 490, 491, 500;
see Furfooz race and Origin

Ojcow, 331, 436, 449

Ondratitz, 331

Orang, 3, 49, 52-54, 56, 77, 511

Origin, of industries, Acheulean, 261, 492,
Aurignacian, 261, 289, 305-307, 322, 492,
Azilian-Tardenoisian, 457, 470-472, 492,
Chellean, 126, 261, 492,
Magdalenian, 351-353, 383,
Mousterian, 261,
Pre-Chellean, 126,
Solutrean, 330, 331, 340, 353, 492;
of human races,
Alpine, 458, 484, 485,
Brünn, 331, 492,
Crô-Magnon, 261, 322, 492,
Furfooz, 492,

Page 686

Grimaldi, 262,
Heidelberg, 492,
Mediterranean, 492,
Neanderthal, 492,
Ofnet, 457, 484, 485,
Piltdown, 492,
Teutonic, 486

Otter, 63, 71, 76, 165, 201, 287, 468, 498;
see Lutra vulgaris

Ovibos, 376;
moschatus, 193, 445, 447, see Musk-ox

Ovis argaloides, 369;
see Argali sheep

P
Painted Pebbles, see Azilian-Tardenoisian industry

Painting, 305, 316-318, 320, 321, 324, 325, 327, 328, 330, 358, 365, 394-
396, 404-406, 408-429, 464, 465, 474, 496, 497

Pair-non-Pair, 279, 307, 314, 317, 320-322, 331, 336, 394-396

Palæolith, 11, 24, 84, 85, 109, 111, 158, 389

Palæolithic, Old Stone Age, 13, 16, 18, 19, 21, 28, 33, 41, 108, 160, 280,
362;
Lower Palæolithic, 14, 41, 108, 113, 114, 214, 280, 362, 490, 491;
Upper Palæolithic, 14, 41, 108, 214, 275, 276, 278, 280, 362, 395, 396,
490, 491, 500;
chronology, 18, 41, 108, 280, 362, 456

Palæopithecus, 49, 511

Page 687

Parietal Art, see Painting

Pasiega, La, 319, 395, 402-405

Pataud, 245, 246, 331

Paviland, 279, 289, 290, 294, 314, 440

Pech de l'Azé, 214, 219, 245

Perçoir, drill, borer, 130, 135, 153, 172, 179, 253, 254, 270, 306, 308, 310,
311, 344, 346, 385, 386, 388, 390, 392, 470, 473, 488

Percuteur, hammer-stone, 130, 254, 270, 306

Pescara, 167

Petit Puymoyen, 214, 245, 246

Pic, pick, 494

Pierre de jet, throwing stone, 130, 172, 213, 254, 270, 306

Pika, 46, 362, 447;
see Lagomys (pusillus)

Piltdown, 109, 116, 128, 130-135, 149, 152, 214, Pl. II;
industry, 127, 128, 133-135;
man (Eoanthropus), 7, 23, 24, 40, 50, 53, 54, 56, 130-145, 214, 489-491;
race, see Piltdown man and Origin

Pindal, 314-316, 325, 349, 394, 395

Pithecanthropus, Trinil race, 7, 23, 24, 40, 53, 54, 86, 491, 511, Pl. II;
anatomical features, 9, 10, 53, 56, 74, 77-84, 233, 234, 240, 490;
discovery, 73-77

Page 688

Placard, 279, 331, 333, 334, 340, 345-348, 352, 353, 355, 378-380, 383,
385, 389, 435, 436, 438

Planing tool, see Grattoir

Pleistocene, see Glacial Epoch

Pliohylobates, 49, 54

Pliopithecus, 49, 54

Poignard, dagger, poniard, 271, 392, 432

Poinçon, awl, 271, 308, 346, 392, 470

Pointe, point, knife, lance head, spear head, 15, 113, 153, 172, 177, 179,
248-255, 270, 306, 308, 310, 311, 473;
Châtelperron, 306, 307, 311;
pointe à cran, shouldered, 270, 308, 310, 313, 334, 340, 342, 345, 346,
352;
pointe à face plane, 341;
pointe de lance, 271, 306;
pointe de laurier, laurel leaf, 15, 270, 310-312, 334, 337, 339-341, 344,
345, 347, 348, 352;
pointe de sagaie, javelin point, 271, 308, 340, 346, 354, 355, 361, 364,
370, 383, 387, 390, 442, 449, 462, 494;
pointe de saute, willow leaf, 340, 344, 347;
pointe à soie, 270, 310, 311, 313, 340, 345

Polisher, see Lissoir

Portel, Le, 319, 394, 411, 412

Postglacial Stage, see Glacial Epoch

Pottery, 461, 466, 474, 486, 488, 496

Page 689

Praule, Trou de, 435

Pre-Chellean, 16, 18, 36, 41;
chronology, 18, 33, 40, 41, 90, 107-115, 280, 362;
climate, 108, 112, 114, 117, 118, 123;
fauna, 108-112, 117, 124, 125;
industry, 40, 114, 120-130, 270;
stations, 109, 116, 122-128, 149, 150-152, 158, see Continental outline
and Origin

Předmost, 257, 279, 331, 341, 345, 348, 349, 366, 395, 427;
see Brünn race;
mammoth hunters, 279, 337

Primates, 3-10, 40, 49-64, 73-84, 86, 140, 141, 217, 219, 227, 231, 233-
235, 237-240, 490, 491

Prince, Grotte du, see Grimaldi, Grottes de

Propliopithecus, 49, 54

Propstfels, 372, 435, 442, 469

Propulseur, spear thrower, dart thrower, 271, 355, 391, 432, 433, 436, 445,
449

Ptarmigan, Lagopus, 44, 206, 207, 287, 289, 370, 371, 375, 469

Q
Quartz, 166

Quartzite, 163, 164, 265

Quina, La, 9, 113, 211, 213, 214, 245, 246, 248, 253-256;

Page 690

man, 7, 9, 214, 216, 217, 219, 221, 225, 236, 237, 248

R
Rabbit, 265, 343, 368, 468;
see Lepus cuniculus

Racloir, scraper, 113, 114, 130, 135, 172, 178, 209, 248, 250, 251, 253-255,
270, 306, 387, 388, 470, 472, 473, 488

Rangifer tarandus, 193, 209, 210, 285;
see Reindeer

Räuberhöhle, 245, 247, 248, 314

Raymonden, 349, 376, 388, 435

Reilhac, 331, 471

Reindeer, 13, 41, 43, 44, 46, 102, 103, 187, 191-194, 196, 197, 202, 205,
206, 209, 210-212, 214, 221, 223, 225, 284, 285, 286-289, 314, 317, 332,
333, 365, 366, 370, 372, 385, 392, 399, 405, 407, 411-413, 415, 419-421,
429, 433, 440, 441, 445, 447, 461, 462, 468, 469, 471, 474, 481, 498;
see Rangifer

Reindeer Epoch, Period, 13, 14, 102, 192, 275, 286, 363, 375, 392, 438,
456, 459

Religion, 272, 358-360, 463, 465, 501

Remouchamp, 471, 474

Ressaulier, 435, 436

Restorations, Knight, Charles R., frontispiece, 358;
McGregor, J. Howard, 9, 79-82, 87, 137, 140, 142, 143, 145, 203, 242,

Page 691

243, 273, 293, 300, 301;
Rutot-Mascré, 73, 101, 484, 495

Retouch, 169-172, 248, 269, 306, 308, 310, 331, 332, 338, 339, 358,

Page 692

389

Rey, 331

Rhens, 284, 314

Rhinoceros, 38, 39, 43, 44, 62, 76, 123, 221, 245, 289, 337, 356, 365, see
Dicerorhinus;
Etruscan, 34, 95-97, 101, 109, 110-112, 117, 125, 134, 144, see D.
etruscus;
Merck's (broad-nosed), 27, 43, 47, 93, 94, 97, 102, 109, 119, 124, 125,
134, 147, 148, 151, 155, 157, 161, 164, 165, 177, 182, 186, 187, 192, 205,
263-265, see D. merckii;
woolly, 11, 13, 40, 41, 117, 148, 174, 187, 190, 191, 196, 199, 205, 206,
208-210, 213, 218, 223, 225, 281, 285-288, 314, 319, 324-326, 348, 363,
366, 372, 400, 409, see D. antiquitatis

Riss, see Glacial Epoch

River-drifts, 5, 11, 12, 23;
formation, 24-27, 90, 119, 154-157, 186;
stations, 114-116, 119-124, 154-156;
terraces, 20, 23, 24-28, 34, 85, 90, 104, 154-157, 162

Robenhausen, 471, 495

Roccamorice, 167

Roche au Loup, 307, 314

Rochette, La, 245, 246

Rock Shelters, 32, 33

Rodent Layers, 447;
Lower, 206, 207, 211, 281, 314;

Page 693

Upper, 281, 361, 363, 446

Romanelli, 306, 314

Rüderbach, 167

Rüdersheim, 167

Rupicapra, see Chamois

Ruth, Le, 314, 331, 435

Rutot-Mascré, see Restorations

S
Sablon, 162, 167

Sabre-tooth tiger, 34, 43, 62, 69, 70, 72, 94, 102, 110-112, 117, 125, 144,
147;
see Machærodus

Sagaie, javelin point, see Pointe de sagaie

Saiga antelope, 44, 46, 194, 287, 289, 333, 357, 362, 366, 373, 374, 376,
449

Saiga tartarica, see Saiga antelope

Salitre, 435

Saint Acheul, 5, 14, 16, 109, 116, 119-124, 127-129, 149-152, 155, 162,
163, 166, 167, 170, 244, 245, 249, 283, 314, 331, 435, 440

Saint Lizier, 435

Page 694

Saint Martin d'Excideuil, 331

Saint Prest, 17, 67-69

San Isidro, 109, 126, 149, 152, 167, 245, 246

Sciurus vulgaris, 367;
see Squirrel

Schmiechenfels, 372, 435, 469

Schussenquelle, 372, 435, 442

Schussenried, 435, 441;
see Schussenquelle

Schweizersbild, 286, 361, 364, 370, 435, 441, 442, 444-447, 449, 460

Scraper, see Racloir

Sculpture, 317, 320-323, 328, 329, 347-349, 356-358, 392, 393, 395, 396,
427-434

Second Glacial Stage, see Glacial Epoch

Second Interglacial Stage, see Glacial Epoch

Seven Oaks, 471, 475

Shelters, abris, see Rock Shelters

Šipka, 214, 219, 221, 228, 245, 247, 248, 435, 449

Sireuil, 314, 322, 395

Sirgenstein, 201, 202, 245, 248, 285, 314, 331, 370, 372, 435, 441, 460

Page 695

Sivapithecus, 511

Siwalik, see Fauna

Solutré, 16, 279, 283, 286, 288, 294, 314, 330, 331, 341-345, 373, 435, 436,
438

Solutrean, 14-16, 18, 41, 270, 271, 276, 278, 280;
art, 347-350, 357;
burial customs, 332;
chronology, 18, 33, 41, 108, 280, 362;
climate, 41, 108, 276, 280, 281, 332, 333;
fauna, 332-334, 343, 348, 366;
human fossils, 279, 334-337;
industry, 275-278, 330-332, 334, 338-348, 351, 352, 354, 358;
stations, 326-328, 331, 337, 340-348, see Origin

Somme River, 12, 110, 112, 114-117, 119, 120, 122-125, 127, 162, 252, 276

Sorde, 279, 378, 435, 438

Souzy, 435

Spermophilus rufescens, 194, 373;
see Suslik

Spear-point, see Pointe

Speech, power of, 4, 58, 60, 139, 140

Spiennes, 127, 128, 495

Spy, 162, 214, 244, 245, 311, 314, 331;
man, 7, 181, 214, 218-220, 226, 228, 229, 231-233, 235-237, 244, 256,
257, 490

Squirrel, 447, 498;

Page 696

see Sciurus vulgaris

Stag, 43, 44, 95, 106, 119, 187, 201, 202, 264, 265, 288, 333, 364, 367, 370,
372, 405, 426, 429, 456, 461, 463, 468, 469, 481, 488, 497, 498;
see Cervus elaphus and Deer, red

Stegodon, 76, 134

Strassberg, 435

Stratification of Castillo, 164;
Enfants, Grotte des, 265;
Heidelberg, 97;
Madeleine, La, 385;
Mas d'Azil, 461;
Ofnet, 476;
Piltdown, 133;
Placard, 333-334;
Saint Acheul, 122, 123, 150;
Schweizersbild, 447;
Sirgenstein, 202

Subsidence, see Continental outline

Sureau, Trou du, 435

Sus, arvernensis, 63;
scrofa, 71;
scrofa ferus, 147, 165, 368, 469;
scrofa palustris, 499;
see Boar

Suslik, 206, 289, 447;
see Spermophilus rufescens

T

Page 697

Tables, see Lists

Tardenoisian, see Azilian-Tardenoisian

Tasmanian compared with Neanderthal, 232, 233;
see Neanderthal

Taubach, 119, 167, 214

Tectiforms, 283, 284, 403, 404

Terraces, see River-drifts

Teutonic race, 458, 486, 488, 499-501

Teyjat, 388, 394, 396, 435;
see Mairie, Grotte de la, and Abri Mège

Thiede, 314

Third Glacial Stage, see Glacial Epoch

Third Interglacial Stage, see Glacial Epoch

Throwing stone, see Pierre de jet

Thumb, opposable, 55, 58, 60, 240

Tibia, shin-bone 237-239, 241, 266, 298

Tilloux, 109, 149, 152, 167

Torralba, 109, 126, 149, 152

Tourasse, La, 471, 486

Page 698

Trilobite, Grotte du, 314, 324, 326, 331, 340, 341, 344, 347, 440

Trinil race, see Pithecanthropus

Trogontherium, 45, 69, 94;
see Beaver, giant

Tuc d'Audoubert, 32, 395, 396, 406, 427-431, 435

Tundra, see Climate, glacial;
see Fauna

Turbarian, Lower, 361;
Upper, 363

U
Upper drift, 191

Upper Rodent Layer, see Rodent Layers

Urochs, Aurochs, see Bos primigenius and Cattle

Ursus, arctos, 102, 147, 211, 469;
arvernensis, 63, 94, 102;
deningeri, 102;
spelæus, 45, 183, 210, 211, 369;
see Bear and Cave-bear

V
Vache, Grotte de la, 435, 437, 471

Valle, 435, 466, 471, 474

Page 699

Venosa, 167

Villejuif, 30, 167, 176

Volgu, 331, 339, 345

Völklinshofen, 284, 314

Vulpes, 469;
see Fox

W
Warm fauna, see Faune chaude

Weimar, 167

Wierschowie, 245, 248, 331

Wildcat, Felis catus, 43, 63, 95, 287, 498

Wildhaus, 314, 435

Wildkirchli, 200, 201, 245, 247, 256

Wildscheuer, 286, 314, 370, 435, 442, 444

Willendorf, 30, 279, 311-315, 322, 395

Winterlingen, 435

Wisent, see Bison

Wolf, 43, 44, 71, 95, 147, 165, 187, 206, 264, 265, 287, 288, 333, 343, 348,
356, 366, 441, 447, 468, 498;

Page 700

see Canis suessi and Cyon alpinus fossilis

Wolvercote, 167

Wolverene, glutton, 44, 46, 71, 193, 287, 289, 348, 370, 447, 468, 498;
see Gulo luscus

Würm, see Glacial Epoch

Wüste Scheuer, 471

Z
Zonhoven, 471, 474

Zuffenhausen, 314

Page 701

Larger Image

THE PRINCIPAL CAVERN REGIONS OF SOUTHWESTERN EUROPE INCLUDING
THE CAVERNS THAT CONTAIN PALEOLITHIC MURAL DECORATIONS

Region traversed in the author's motor tour of 1912 through the Palæolithic
caverns of Italy, France, and Spain.

Footnotes:
[A] The folding map at the end of the volume exhibits the entire extent of
the author's tour.
[B] Lucretius was born 95 B. C. His poem was completed before 53 B. C.
In the opening lines of Book III he attributes all his philosophy and science
to the Greeks. See Appendix, Note I.
[C] Lucretius, On the Nature of Things, metrical version by J. M. Good.
Bohn's Classical Library, London, 1890.

Page 702

[D] Horace was born 65 B. C., and his Satires are attributed to the years 35-
29 B. C. See Appendix, Note II.
[E] Æschylus was born 525 B. C. See Appendix, Note III.
[F] Georges Louis Leclerc Buffon (b. 1707, d. 1788). For reviews of
Buffon's opinions and theories see Osborn, 1894.1, pp. 130-9; also Butler,
1911.1, pp. 74-172.
[G] Jean Baptiste Pierre Antoine de Monet, known as the Chevalier de
Lamarck (b. 1744, d. 1829). For a summary of the views of Lamarck see
Osborn, 1894.1, pp. 152-181; also Butler, 1911.1, pp. 235-314, an excellent
presentation of Lamarck's opinions.
[H] References are indicated by numbers only throughout the text. At the
close of each chapter is a list giving the author, date, and reference number
for every citation. A full list of all the works cited, including those from
which illustrations have been taken, together with complete references, will
be found in the bibliography at the end of the book.
[I] The best reference works on the history of French and German
Palæolithic Archæology are: Cartailhac,(12) La France Préhistorique;
Déchelette,(13) Manuel d'Archéologie, T. 1; Reinach,(14) Catalogue du
Musée de St.-Germain: Alluvions et Cavernes; Schmidt,(15) Die diluviale
Vorzeit Deutschlands; Avebury,(16) Prehistoric Times.
[J] The Cannstatt skull and Cannstatt race are now regarded as Neolithic,
and therefore not contemporary with the mammoth or the cave-bear.
[K] Note that lists and tables of races, cultural stages, faunæ, etc., in this
volume are given not in chronological but in stratigraphic order, beginning
with the most recent at the top and ending with the oldest at the bottom.
[L] This table is a modification of that of Obermaier in his Mensch der
Vorzeit.(38) To each period of the chronologic reckoning should be added
the 1900 years of our era.
[M] Bison and wild cattle are grass eaters, and their natural habitats are the
open plain and meadow regions. They also range into open forest lands
where grasses can be found. The prehistoric 'urus' and 'wisent' of Europe

Page 703

were both found in forests, but this may not have been their natural habitat
in Palæolithic times. See Appendix, Note IV.
[N] A recent article by A. Smith Woodward describes the fourth known
specimen of Dryopithecus, lately discovered in northern Spain (see
Woodward, 1914.2).
[O] There is a vast Pithecanthropus literature. That chiefly utilized in the
present description includes Dubois,(13) Fischer,(14) Schwalbe,(15)
Büchner.(16)
[P] In the Trinil skull as restored by McGregor (Fig. 36) the cranial capacity
is 900 c.cm.
[Q] These horses are now identified respectively as E. mauerensis, E.
mosbachensis, and E. süssenbornensis.
[R] This glaciation as it occurs in northern Europe has been termed
Polandian by Geikie; in the Alps Penck has termed it the Riss; in America it
is known as the Illinoian from the great drifts it deposited over the State of
Illinois.
[S] This stage is known as the Helvetian or Dürntenian of Geikie; it is the
Riss-Würm of Penck's terminology and the Sangamon of the American
glaciologists.
[T] Modified after Schmidt.
[U] The weakness of Penck's argument for placing the Chellean in the
Second Interglacial was exposed by precise observations of Boule(5) and
Obermaier(6) in the Alps, the Jura, and the Pyrenees.
[V] The writer is indebted to M. Marcelin Boule and to M. l'Abbé Henri
Breuil for their observations on this fauna and culture period.
[W] Industry similar to the Chellean, but not necessarily of the same age, is
distributed all over eastern Africa from Egypt to the Cape.
[X] Schmidt regards the Strépyan implements, which are considered by
Rutot and others to be transitional, between the Mesvinian and the

Page 704

Chellean, as closely similar to the Pre-Chellean of France and probably of
the same age.
[Y] The original paper describing this remarkable discovery was read
before the Geological Society of London, December, 1912, and published
as a separate pamphlet in March, 1913. A discussion as to the geologic age
by Kennard, Clement Reid, and others was held at the time of the reading of
the original paper.
[Z] By the author of this work, and also by Professor J. Howard McGregor
of Columbia University and Doctor William K. Gregory of Columbia
University and of the American Museum of Natural History.
[AA] Guide to the Fossil Remains of Man, 1915.1.
[AB] The reconstruction (Fig. 66) of the Piltdown skull made by Professor
J. H. McGregor has a cranial capacity of about 1300 c.cm. The brain (Fig.
70) is seen to be very narrow and low in the prefrontal area, the seat of the
higher mental faculties. In the reconstruction the cranial region is in the
main very like the second restoration by Doctor Smith Woodward, but the
jaws differ in some respects. The tooth hitherto regarded as a right lower
canine, is now placed as the left upper canine, in accord with the
conclusions of the author of this work and of Doctors Matthew and Gregory
of the American Museum of Natural History. The dental arches are more
curved, thus more human and less ape-like than in the Smith Woodward
restoration, and the chin region is made somewhat deeper, thus giving a
somewhat less prognathous aspect to the face.
[AC] The early Teutonic designation of these animals was as follows: bison,
'wisent,' wild ox, 'auerochs,' 'urochs' (the 'urus' of Cæsar). The urus survived
in Germany as late as the seventeenth century, while a few of the bison or
'wisent' survive to the present time. The bison was distinctively a short-
headed animal, while its contemporary, the urus, was long-headed and less
agile. At Dürnten, near Zürich, remains of the urus are found associated
with those of the hardy, straight-tusked elephant and of Merck's rhinoceros.
(See Appendix, Note IV.)
[AD] The author was guided through this station by Doctor Hugo
Obermaier in the summer of 1912.

Page 705

[AE] The entire fourth glaciation has been termed Mecklenburgian by
Geikie;(6) the recession may correspond with his Fourth Interglacial Stage,
the Lower Forestian. It is the Würm of Penck in the Alpine region, with a
first and second maximum separated by the recession known as the
Laufenschwankung. In America it is the early Wisconsin with the Peorian
recession interval, followed by the late Wisconsin, which is the final great
glaciation of America.
[AF] Obermaier, Breuil and Schmidt assign La Micoque to the transition
between late Acheulean and early Mousterian times.
[AG] The climate of the tundras is extreme, the winter temperature falling
on an average to 27°F. below zero, while in summer the temperature is
about 50°F. In the subarctic steppes the average January temperature hardly
exceeds 30°F., while that of July is 70°F.
[AH] The last of this very primitive race of the great island of Tasmania
became extinct in 1877.(62)
[AI] This cavern, like many of those discovered in the early days of
anthropological research, was not carefully explored in reference to the all-
important horizontal bedding of the layers of flint flakes and of animal
remains.
[AJ] See Appendix, Note VI.
[AK] Named in honor of the reigning Prince of Monaco, whose generous
gifts and personal interest made the adequate exploration of these grottos
possible.
[AL] This correlation agrees in the main with that of Schmidt in his
Diluviale Vorzeit Deutschlands.(10)
[AM] Obermaier,(19) R. Martin.(20)
[AN] Denotes very frequent occurrence of a typical form.
[AO] Denotes very frequent occurrence of a typical form.
[AP] Denotes very frequent occurrence of a typical form.

Page 706

[AQ] Breuil,(34) Schmidt.(35)
[AR] The writer had the privilege of visiting all these caverns in the
company either of Professor Emile Cartailhac, or of the Abbé Breuil.
[AS] Despite Schwalbe's statement, the supraorbital ridges in this skull
appear to form a complete bridge. Doctor Hrdlička regards the related
Předmost skull as distinctly showing Neanderthaloid affinity.
[AT] Obermaier,(45) R. Martin.(46)
[AU] From notes by Doctor Robert H. Lowie (Nov. 16, 1914) of the
American Museum of Natural History on the opinions of Marett
(Anthropology) and of James.
[AV] After Obermaier,(10) R. Martin,(11) and others.
[AW] This custom is observed again in Azilian times in the burials at Ofnet
on the Danube (see page 475).
[AX] The whole history of these successive discoveries, beginning with the
finding of an engraved bone, in 1834, in the grotto of Chaffaud, and
concluding with the discoveries of Lalanne, and of Bégouen, in 1912, is
summarized in the admirable little handbook by Salomon Reinach.(23) This
convenient volume also includes outline tracings of the more important
drawings and sculptures found in western Europe up to the present time.
[AY] Only a few drawings from this cavern have as yet been published,
such as the famous mammoth of Combarelles; the entire work is in the
hands of Breuil.
[AZ] The stations of Castillo, of Pasiega, and of Altamira were visited by
the writer, under the guidance of Doctor Hugo Obermaier, in August, 1912.
[BA] Letter of October 23, 1912.
[BB] J. Bayer(34) has lately expressed the opinion that the industry of the
open 'loess' stations of Munzingen, Aggsbach, and Gobelsburg is not really
of Magdalenian age, but represents an atypical Aurignacian.

Page 707

[BC] Lucretius, On the Nature of Things, metrical version by J. M. Good.
Bohn's Classical Library, London, 1890.
[BD] Bossuet, Jacques Bénigne, Discours sur l'Histoire universelle (first
published in 1681), pp. 9, 10. Edition conforme à celle de 1700, troisième et
dernière édition revue par l'auteur. Paris, Librairie de Firmin Didot Frères,
1845.
[BE] The Satires, Epistles and Ars Poetica of Horace, the Latin Text with
Conington's Translation, pp. 29, 31. George Bell & Sons, London, 1904.
[BF] Æschylus, Prometheus Bound. Elizabeth Barrett Browning, Poetical
Works of Elizabeth Barrett Browning, pp. 148, 149. Oxford edition, 1906.
Henry Frowde, London, Edinburgh, Glasgow, New York, and Toronto.
[BG] Kobelt, W., Die Verbreitung der Tierwelt, pp. 403-7. C. H. Tauchnitz,
Leipsic, 1902.
[BH] Abercromby, Hon. John, The Prehistoric Pottery of the Canary
Islands and Its Makers. Royal Anthropological Institute, November 17,
1914. Nature, December 3, 1914, p. 383.
[BI] Verneau, Dr. R., Cinq années de séjour aux îles Canaries. (Ouvrage
couronné par l'Académie des sciences, 1891.)
[BJ] Bunbury, E. H. History of Ancient Geography, vol. I, pp. 318-333.
John Murray, London, 1879.
[BK] Authors' names are given in the bibliography and in the reference lists
at the end of each chapter.

Page 708

*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK MEN OF THE OLD
STONE AGE: THEIR ENVIRONMENT, LIFE AND ART ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
States without permission and without paying copyright royalties.
Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license,
apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic
works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and
trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not
be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of
the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the Project
Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for copies of this
eBook, complying with the trademark license is very easy. You may
use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative
works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg eBooks
may be modified and printed and given away—you may do practically
ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S.
copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license,
especially commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE

Page 709

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG™ LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or
any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project
Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
Gutenberg License available with this file or online at
www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing
Project Gutenberg electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg electronic
work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept
all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
all copies of Project Gutenberg electronic works in your possession. If
you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg
electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms of this
agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom
you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people
who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg electronic
works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the
Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the

Page 710

collection of Project Gutenberg electronic works. Nearly all the
individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the
United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in
the United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
that you will support the Project Gutenberg mission of promoting free
access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg works
in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project
Gutenberg name associated with the work. You can easily comply with
the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format
with its attached full Project Gutenberg License when you share it
without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
other Project Gutenberg work. The Foundation makes no
representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
access to, the full Project Gutenberg License must appear prominently
whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg work (any work on which
the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase
“Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed,
viewed, copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States
and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
under the terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License included with

Page 711

this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located
in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the
country where you are located before using this eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg electronic work is derived
from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a
notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright
holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the United
States without paying any fees or charges. If you are redistributing or
providing access to a work with the phrase “Project Gutenberg”
associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply either with
the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain
permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg
trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
will be linked to the Project Gutenberg License for all works posted
with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of
this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide
access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg work in a format
other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official

Page 712

version posted on the official Project Gutenberg website
(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of
obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain
Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the
full Project Gutenberg License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg electronic works provided
that:

• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from the
use of Project Gutenberg works calculated using the method you
already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the
owner of the Project Gutenberg trademark, but he has agreed to donate
royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days
following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to
prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly
marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information about
donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”

• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does
not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You
must require such a user to return or destroy all copies of the works
possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use of and all
access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.

• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
receipt of the work.

Page 713

• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free distribution
of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™
electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth
in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of the
Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in
Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend
considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and
proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the
Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may be
stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete,
inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES -
Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in
paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation,
the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party
distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this
agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and
expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO
REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH
OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE
FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY
DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT,
CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES

Page 714

EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you
discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it,
you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by
sending a written explanation to the person you received the work
from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must return
the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity that
provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a
replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work
electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to
give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu
of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a
refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If
any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law
of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any
provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the
Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the
Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any
volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution
of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability,
costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly
from any of the following which you do or cause to occur: (a)

Page 715

distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg work, (b) alteration,
modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg work,
and (c) any Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project
Gutenberg

Project Gutenberg is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg’s goals
and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg collection will remain freely
available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure and
permanent future for Project Gutenberg and future generations. To
learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and
the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the state
of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue
Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification number is
64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S.
federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 41 Watchung Plaza
#516, Montclair NJ 07042, USA, +1 (862) 621-9288. Email contact

Page 716

links and up to date contact information can be found at the
Foundation’s website and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small
donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax
exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United States.
Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a considerable
effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up with these
requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where we have
not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Page 717

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg
electronic works

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg
concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project
Gutenberg eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search facility:
www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg, including
how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.

Page 718

back

Page 719

back

Page 720

back

Page 721

back

Page 722

back

Page 723

back

Page 724

back

Page 725

Page 726

back

Page 727

back

Page 728

back

Page 729

back

Page 730

back

Page 731

back

Page 732

back

Page 733

back

Page 734

back

Page 735

back

Page 736

back

Page 737

Page 738

back

Page 739

back

Page 740

back

Page 741

back

Page 742

back

Page 743

back

Page 744

Page 745

back

Page 746

back

Page 747

Page 748

back

Page 749

back

Page 750

Page 751

back

Page 752

Page 753

back

Page 754

back

Page 755

back

Page 756

back

Page 757

back

Page 758

back

Page 759

Page 760

back

Page 761

Page 762

back

Page 763

back

Page 764

back

Page 765

back

Page 766

back

Page 767

back

Page 768

back

Page 769

back

Page 770

Page 771

back

Page 772

Page 773

back

Page 774

back

Page 775

back

Page 776

Page 777

back

Page 778

back

Page 779

back

Page 780

back

Page 781

back

Page 782

Page 783

back

Page 784

Page 785

back

Page 786

back

Page 787

back

Page 788

back

Page 789

back

Page 790

back

Page 791

back

Page 792

back

Page 793

PDF language

简体中文 https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=08b7defbb2c9a5e4d8930888a1b7bdaf&bl=zh Translating…
Español https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=08b7defbb2c9a5e4d8930888a1b7bdaf&bl=es Translating…
Français https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=08b7defbb2c9a5e4d8930888a1b7bdaf&bl=fr Translating…
Deutsch https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=08b7defbb2c9a5e4d8930888a1b7bdaf&bl=de Translating…
日本語 https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=08b7defbb2c9a5e4d8930888a1b7bdaf&bl=ja Translating…
한국어 https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=08b7defbb2c9a5e4d8930888a1b7bdaf&bl=ko Translating…
Português https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=08b7defbb2c9a5e4d8930888a1b7bdaf&bl=pt Translating…
Русский https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=08b7defbb2c9a5e4d8930888a1b7bdaf&bl=ru Translating…
العربية https://pdftoflip.com/view.php?t=08b7defbb2c9a5e4d8930888a1b7bdaf&bl=ar Translating…